Quarterlytics / Industrials / Aerospace & Defense / Mercury Systems

Mercury Systems

mrcy · NASDAQ Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker mrcy
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Industrials
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2023 Annual Report · Mercury Systems
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2023 ANNUAL REPORT

Delivering high-performance 
processing that makes a 
meaningful impact today

FY23  FINANCIAL RESULTS

REVENUE

ORGANIC REVENUE

BOOKINGS

GAAP NET LOSS

ADJUSTED EBITDA

$974M

$948M

$1,076M 

$(28M)

$132M

>

1%

3%>

1%>

N.A.

34%>

MERCURY SYSTEMS BY THE NUMBERS

~2,600 

Number of team members 
globally, ~30% hold DoD 
security clearances

24

$974M

Global state-of-the-art  
facilities

FY23 revenue, 20% CAGR FY16–FY23 
6% avg. organic growth FY17–FY23

25+

300+

Prime customers:  
including virtually all leaders  
in the A&D industry

Installed base: number 
of A&D programs with 
Mercury embedded

40+

Years of tech leadership 
in A&D industry

$109M

FY23 research and  
development spend

Cautionary Notice About Forward-Looking Statements

$132M

FY23 Adj. EBITDA, 14% margin 
13% CAGR FY16–FY23

75%

Of primes consider  
Mercury their top processing 
technology provider

This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including those relating 
to the Company’s focus on enhanced execution of the Company’s strategic plan under a refreshed Board and leadership team. You can identify these statements by 
the words “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “likely,” “forecast,” “probable,” “potential,” 
and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected 
or anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, continued funding of defense programs, the timing and amounts of such funding, general 
economic and business conditions, including unforeseen weakness in the Company’s markets, effects of any U.S. federal government shutdown or extended 
continuing resolution, effects of geopolitical unrest and regional conflicts, competition, changes in technology and methods of marketing, delays in or cost increases 
related to completing development, engineering and manufacturing programs, changes in customer order patterns, changes in product mix, continued success in 
technological advances and delivering technological innovations, changes in, or in the U.S. government’s interpretation of, federal export control or procurement rules 
and regulations, changes in, or in the interpretation or enforcement of, environmental rules and regulations, market acceptance of the Company’s products, shortages 
in or delays in receiving components, supply chain delays or volatility for critical components such as semiconductors, production delays or unanticipated expenses 
including due to quality issues or manufacturing execution issues, failure to achieve or maintain manufacturing quality certifications, such as AS9100, the impact 
of the COVID pandemic and supply chain disruption, inflation and labor shortages, among other things, on program execution and the resulting effect on customer 
satisfaction, inability to fully realize the expected benefits from acquisitions, restructurings, and execution excellence initiatives or delays in realizing such benefits, 
challenges in integrating acquired businesses and achieving anticipated synergies, effects of shareholder activism, increases in interest rates, changes to industrial 
security and cyber-security regulations and requirements and impacts from any cyber or insider threat events, changes in tax rates or tax regulations, such as the 
deductibility of internal research and development, changes to interest rate swaps or other cash flow hedging arrangements, changes to generally accepted accounting 
principles, difficulties in retaining key employees and customers, which difficulties may be impacted by the termination of the Company’s announced strategic review 
initiative, unanticipated challenges with the transition of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer roles, including any dispute arising with the 
former CEO over his resignation, unanticipated costs under fixed-price service and system integration engagements, and various other factors beyond our control. 
These risks and uncertainties also include such additional risk factors as are discussed in the Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 
including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.  
The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes 
no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.

INNOVATION THAT MATTERS

Mercury’s position in the
market is unique. We are leading 
the development and adaption 
of innovative technologies that 
modernize A&D solutions.

Dear Mercury Shareholders,

ENHANCED FOCUS ON EXECUTION

It is a privilege to be leading Mercury Systems, a technology 
company at the intersection of high tech and aerospace and 
defense, delivering high-performance processing that makes 
a meaningful impact today. It is an exciting time to be taking 
the helm and as I meet with customers and visit our different 
locations, I continue to be impressed by the candid and 
meaningful conversations I have. Our customers rely on us 
to help them solve their most pressing challenges and place 
their confidence in us. The people of Mercury care about our 
customers and the work we do.

Mercury at its core is strong. We have a fundamental business 
model worthy of admiration. What we do, the innovation 
we deliver, and the capabilities that we put into the hands 
of men and women in uniform serving our country and our 
allies directly affects safety and security across the globe. 
I am confident that our efforts, resilience, and dedication, 
combined with our strategy, priorities, and focus, will guide 
the company through our next chapter.

INNOVATION THAT MATTERS

Mercury’s position in the market is unique. We are leading the 
development and adaptation of innovative technologies that 
modernize A&D solutions, making us a national asset in the 
defense industrial base. At a macro level, we are positioned in 
an attractive growth market — defense technology — and more 
importantly, we are situated in the right parts of that market 
that are experiencing spending growth. At a micro level, we 
are designed-in with sole-source positions on critical defense 
programs poised for significant electronic modernization.

The majority of our business is performing well, delivering 
predictable and profitable growth. This solid performance 
has been partially masked by approximately 20 programs 
that are experiencing unique and outsized costs, primarily 
temporary cost growth related to initial development 
challenges. Mercury has great fundamentals and we need  
a renewed focus to restore and drive strong returns.

While we have taken and will continue to take actions to 
improve predictability, organic growth, margin, and cash flow, 
2024 will be a transition year. We will continue to enhance our 
management system and processes in order to deliver on our 
financial commitments and drive long-term shareholder value.

We have four priority areas central to unlocking the intrinsic 
value of the business: Delivering predictable results;  
building a thriving organic growth engine; expanding  
margins; and driving improved free cash flow generation.

Delivering predictable results 

Assessing our program portfolio, our core business consisting 
of franchise production programs is healthy and delivers solid 
gross margins, which gives me confidence and conviction in 
our long-term business model.

Currently, there are two factors that have pressured and 
added variability to our recent results. First, we have been 
successful winning a number of development programs that 
has led to a shift in our program mix from 20% development 
programs in 2021 to 40% in 2023. We know this mix shift is 
temporary in nature and a positive leading indicator of future 
growth, as our development programs are a precursor to 
higher-margin, long-term production contracts. However, 
given that our development programs typically run at 
approximately 1,000 basis points lower gross margin than 
our production programs, we have experienced near-term 
margin pressure tied to the mix shift. 

Second, because our program management systems and 
processes have not matured at the same pace as the growth 
of our business over the last several years, a small number of 
programs have become challenged leading to unanticipated 
and temporary impacts on our overall performance. In 2023, 
execution challenges on approximately 20 programs, a 
majority of which are development in nature, resulted in  
a $56M reduction in profitability.

2023 LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS

mrcy.com

LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS (CONT.)

We are squarely focused on mitigating the effects from the 
challenged programs, completing them, and transitioning 
them into production. We have strengthened our program 
reviews on development programs with increased frequency 
and internal rigor, and tightened program management 
accountability to drive better performance. These execution 
challenges are resolvable, temporary in nature, and the full 
force of the organization is focused on overcoming them. 

Building a thriving organic growth engine focused  
on driving a higher book-to-bill 

Our second focus area requires a tuned growth engine that 
is bidding and winning new contracts at an appropriate level 
given our scale after years of primarily inorganic growth.  
Our book-to-bill has averaged slightly above 1.0 over the past 
eight quarters, which is not adequate to meet our growth 
aspirations. Going forward, we are focused on driving a higher 
book-to-bill, which will help meet our long-term growth 
objectives and above-market growth rates reflecting our 
attractive market positioning.

Scaling up our growth engine will take some time, but  
the good news is that we aren’t opportunity constrained. 
There is a consistent progression associated with targeting 
pipeline and levels of bid activity as leading indicators to 
revenue growth. We have already begun that work led by our 
Growth organization, and while it will take time to translate 
into revenue, I am confident that a healthy growth engine 
combined with Mercury’s strong positioning will lead to 
industry-leading organic growth.

Expanding margins through targeted improvements  
to both our operating expense and gross margin 

We have taken initial actions to simplify our organizational 
structure, facilitate clearer accountability, and align to our 
priorities, including:

• 

• 

• 

 Embedding the processes and execution of our 1MPACT 
transformation program into the business, including in 
every function and at every level of the organization; 

 Streamlining our organizational structure and removing 
areas of redundancy between corporate and divisional 
organizations; and

 Reducing SG&A headcount and rebalancing discretionary 
and third-party spend.

This first set of actions will generate $24M in annual run  
rate cost savings, including a $20–$22M net benefit to  
2024. In the near term, we are evaluating additional efforts  
to drive further efficiencies in SG&A, R&D investment,  
and manufacturing footprint, among others. 

Driving improved free cash flow conversion and  
near-term cash release 

Over the past two years, Mercury has delivered $333M of 
adjusted EBITDA but generated negative $107M in free cash 
flow. Working capital has accumulated on our balance sheet, 
primarily in unbilled receivables and inventory, as a direct 
result of the temporary execution challenges, primarily on 
development programs. 

Based on our work to date, we have clear visibility into the 
drivers of our working capital increase and are focused on 
resolving execution challenges, shipping and billing against 
legacy program unbilled balances, and improving asset 
efficiency through cash-neutral or positive terms and tighter 
alignment of manufacturing cycles with customer deliveries.

LOOKING FORWARD

I am encouraged by three factors: Much of our business 
is performing very well; the execution challenges that are 
masking this performance are occurring on a small subset 
of challenged programs and are all solvable; and the current 
larger-than-normal mix of development programs reflects 
the potential for increased highly predictable and profitable 
business as the programs transition into production. 

I have confidence in Mercury’s business model and see a clear 
path to achieving our objectives. It is remarkable what our 
our nearly 2,600 employees around the world have achieved, 
collectively and individually, and I have seen in my short time 
here that, together, our ability to innovate is unmatched. 

Mercury is in an attractive strategic position with incredible 
potential. We have identified and are systematically and 
strategically removing obstacles that are clouding a healthy 
core. The performance, capabilities, and mindset of our 
teams will enable us to realize our potential. I am honored  
and excited to help lead our organization through this time  
of change and look forward to sharing our progress with you.

Sincerely,

Bill Ballhaus 
President and Chief Executive Officer

September 21, 2023

 
FY23 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

REVENUE ($M)

GAAP Net Income (Loss) ($M)

GAAP Earnings (Loss) Per Share ($)

BACKLOG ($M)

R

G

A

924

5 %   C

1

797

1% 
YOY

655

493

988

974

N.A.
YOY 

85.7

62.0

46.8

40.9

N.A.
YOY 

1.56

0.96

0.86

1.12

11.3

(28.3)

0.20

(0.50)

R

G

A

909

2 1 %   C

831

1,140

1,038

10% 
YOY

625

448

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

ADJ. EBITDA ($M, %) (1)

ADJ. EPS ($) (1)

 34% 
YOY

115

3 %   C A G R

202 201

176

145

FY19

FY20
FY18
FY22
23.2% 22.2% 22.1% 21.9% 20.3%

FY21

54% 
YOY

2.42

2.30

2.19

132

1.84

1.41

1.00

FY23
13.6%

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

FY22

FY23

CAGR figures for period of FY18–FY23. YoY figures 
for period of FY22 vs FY23. Numbers are rounded. 
Per-share data is presented on a fully diluted basis.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The following table summarizes certain historical consolidated financial data, which should be read in conjunction with the consolidated 
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report (in thousands, except per-share data):

Statement of Operations Data

Net revenues

(Loss) income from operations

Net (loss) income

Net (Loss) Earnings Per Share

Basic

Diluted

Adjusted EBITDA(1)

Adjusted EPS(1)

Balance Sheet Data

Working capital

Total assets

Long-term obligations

Total shareholders’ equity

FISCAL YEARS

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

$973,882

$(21,685)

$(28,335)

$(0.50)

$(0.50)

$988,197 

$923,996

$31,610

$11,275

$0.20

$0.20

$81,001 

$62,044

$1.13

$1.12

$796,610

$91,062 

$85,712

$654,744

$76,584 

$46,775

$1.57

$1.56

$0.98

$0.96

$132,253

$200,507

$201,896

$176,242

$145,326

$1.00

$2.19

$2.42

$2.30

$1.84

AS OF FISCAL YEARS

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

$703,754

$621,325

$492,277

$508,854

$484,140

$2,391,367

$2,304,415

$1,955,137

$1,610,720

$1,416,977

$591,418

$573,303

$320,168

$100,021

$34,206

$1,566,685

$1,537,185

$1,484,146

$1,384,784

$1,284,739

(1)   Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS are key measures that are not calculated according to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles 
(“GAAP”). Refer to “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of 
Operations for our definition of these measures, including reconciliations to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. 
Reconciliations to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal  
years 2021, 2022, and 2023.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

mrcy.com

Disruptive business model positioned   
at the intersection of high tech and defense

HIGH TECH

MERCURY 
SYSTEMS

AEROSPACE 
AND DEFENSE

Collaboration with
high-tech industry leaders

Trusted and secure U.S. 
design and manufacturing

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K 

☒

☐

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR

THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED June 30, 2023

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-23599 

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts

04-2741391

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

50 Minuteman Road

Andover MA

(Address of principal executive offices)

01810

(Zip Code)

978-256-1300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934:

Title of Each Class
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share

Trading Symbol
MRCY

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Nasdaq Global Select Market

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ý    No  ¨ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨    No  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements 
for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of 

Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such 
files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an 
emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in 
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ý  Accelerated filer  ¨  Non-accelerated filer  ¨  Smaller reporting company  ☐ 
Emerging growth company  ☐ 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or 

revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control 
over financial report under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.762(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit 
report. Yes ý	No ☐ 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing 

reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that require a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by 

any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to Section 240. 10D-1(b).    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐  No  ý
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $2.6 billion based upon the closing price of the 

Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 30, 2022, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second 
fiscal quarter.

Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of July 31, 2023: 58,189,929 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Exhibit Index on Page 88

1

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX

PART I

PAGE
NUMBER
3

3

16

29

29

29

30

30

32

32
32

33

46

50

83

83

84

84

84

84

84

84

84

85

85

85

87

88

Business

Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.

Properties

Legal Proceedings

Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 4.1. Information About Our Executive Officers

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity 

Securities
Selected Financial Data

Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

Signatures

Exhibit Index

2

 
 
 
PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the 
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results 
could  differ  materially  from  those  set  forth  in  the  forward-looking  statements.  The  reader  may  find  discussions 
containing such forward-looking statements in the material set forth under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of 
Financial  Conditions  and  Results  of  Operations”  as  well  as  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.  Certain 
factors  that  might  cause  such  a  difference  are  discussed  in  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K,  including  in  the  section 
entitled “Risk Factors.”

When used in this report, the terms “Mercury,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and “the Company” refer to Mercury Systems, Inc. and 

its consolidated subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires or as otherwise indicated. 

All references to fiscal 2023 are to the 52-week period from July 2, 2022 to June 30, 2023. All references to fiscal 2022 
are to the 52-week period from July 3, 2021 to July 1, 2022. All references to fiscal 2021 are to the 52-week period from July 4, 
2020 to July 2, 2021. There have been no reclassifications of prior comparable periods due to this change.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Our Company

Mercury  Systems,  Inc.  is  a  technology  company  that  delivers  processing  power  for  the  most  demanding  aerospace  and 
defense  missions.  Headquartered  in  Andover,  Massachusetts,  our  end-to-end  processing  platform  enables  a  broad  range  of 
aerospace and defense programs, optimized for mission success in some of the most challenging and demanding environments. 
Processing technologies that comprise our platform include signal solutions, display, software applications, networking, storage 
and  secure  processing.  Our  innovative  solutions  are  mission-ready,  software-defined  and  open  and  modular,  meeting  our 
customers’  cost  and  schedule  needs  today  by  allowing  them  to  use  or  modify  our  products  to  suit  their  mission.  Customers 
access  our  solutions  via  the  Mercury  Processing  Platform,  which  encompasses  the  broad  scope  of  our  investments  in 
technologies,  companies,  products,  services  and  the  expertise  of  our  people.  Ultimately,  we  connect  our  customers  to  what 
matters most to them. We connect commercial technology to defense, people to data and partners to opportunities. At the most 
human  level,  we  connect  what  we  do  to  our  customers’  missions;  supporting  the  people  for  whom  safety,  security  and 
protecting freedom are of paramount importance.

As  a  leading  manufacturer  of  essential  components,  products,  modules  and  subsystems,  we  sell  to  defense  prime 
contractors, the U.S. government and original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) commercial aerospace companies. Mercury 
has built a trusted, robust portfolio of proven product solutions, leveraging the most advanced commercial silicon technologies 
and  purpose-built  to  exceed  the  performance  needs  of  our  defense  and  commercial  customers.  Customers  add  their  own 
applications and algorithms to our specialized, secure and innovative products and pre-integrated solutions. This allows them to 
complete  their  full  system  by  integrating  with  their  platform,  the  sensor  technology  and,  increasingly,  the  processing  from 
Mercury. Our products and solutions are deployed in more than 300 programs with over 25 different defense prime contractors 
and commercial aviation customers. 

Mercury’s transformational business model accelerates the process of making new technology profoundly more accessible 
to  our  customers  by  bridging  the  gap  between  commercial  technology  and  aerospace  and  defense  applications  on  time 
constraints that matter. Our long-standing deep relationships with leading high-tech and other commercial companies, coupled 
with  our  high  level  of  research  and  development  (“R&D”)  investments  on  a  percentage  basis  of  sales  and  industry-leading 
trusted and secure design and manufacturing capabilities, are the foundational tenets of this highly successful model. We are 
leading  the  development  and  adaptation  of  commercial  technology  for  aerospace  and  defense  solutions.  From  chip-scale  to 
system scale and from data, including radio frequency (“RF”) to digital to decision, we make mission-critical technologies safe, 
secure, affordable and relevant for our customers. 

 Our capabilities, technology, people and R&D investment strategy combine to differentiate Mercury in our industry. We 
maintain  our  technological  edge  by  investing  in  critical  capabilities  and  intellectual  property  (“IP”  or  “building  blocks”)  in 
processing, leveraging open standards and open architectures to adapt quickly those building blocks into solutions for highly 
data-intensive applications, including emerging needs in areas such as artificial intelligence (“AI”).

Our  mission  critical  solutions  are  deployed  by  our  customers  for  a  variety  of  applications  including  command,  control, 
communications,  computers,  intelligence,  surveillance  and  reconnaissance  (“C4ISR”),  electronic  intelligence,  mission 
computing avionics, electro-optical/infrared (“EO/IR”), electronic warfare, weapons and missile defense, hypersonics and radar.  

Our  consolidated  revenues,  acquired  revenues,  net  loss,  diluted  loss  per  share,  adjusted  earnings  per  share  (“adjusted 
EPS”)  and  adjusted  EBITDA  for  fiscal  2023  were  $973.9  million,  $25.1  million,  $(28.3)  million,  $(0.50),  $1.00  and  $132.3 
million, respectively. Our consolidated revenues, acquired revenues, net income, earnings per share ("EPS"), adjusted EPS and 
adjusted  EBITDA  for  fiscal  2022  were  $988.2  million,  $6.0  million,  $11.3  million,  $0.20,  $2.19  and  $200.5  million, 

3

respectively. See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of this annual report for a reconciliation of our acquired revenues, 
adjusted EPS and adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

1MPACT

On August 3, 2021, Mercury announced a companywide effort, called 1MPACT, to lay the foundation for the next phase 
of the Company’s value creation at scale. Since fiscal year 2014, Mercury has completed 15 acquisitions, deploying $1.4 billion 
of  capital  and,  as  a  result,  dramatically  scaled  and  transformed  the  business.  Over  this  time,  the  Company  has  extracted 
substantial revenue and cost synergies from each of these individual acquisitions. The goal of 1MPACT is to achieve Mercury's 
full growth, margin expansion, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow potential over the next five years. 

1MPACT was always intended to be a multi-year journey where Mercury builds on its operational competence until the 
behaviors  and  practices  that  came  with  1MPACT  simply  become  the  way  Mercury  operates.  On  July  18,  2023,  Mercury 
executed the planned evolution of our 1MPACT value creation initiative, embedding the processes and execution of 1MPACT 
into  our  Execution  Excellence  organization.  The  1MPACT  office  has  concluded  its  responsibilities,  having  successfully 
incorporated  the  principles  behind  1MPACT  into  how  Mercury  thinks  about  continuous  improvement  at  all  levels  of  the 
organization. 

Our Business Strategy

Mercury’s  business  strategy  is  based  on  a  differentiated  market  position:  we  make  trusted,  secure,  mission  critical 
technologies  profoundly  more  accessible  to  the  aerospace  and  defense  industry.  The  Mercury  Processing  Platform  serves 
customers  with  cutting-edge  commercial  technology  innovations,  purpose  built  and  mission-ready  for  aerospace  and  defense 
applications,  through  above  average  industry  investment  on  a  percentage  basis  in  R&D.  Our  strategy  is  built  to  meet  the 
aerospace and defense market’s need for speed and affordability.

Our ability to continue to improve our performance and deliver results demands we all align around the few actions that 

unlock the intrinsic value in the business. As such, we will focus on four areas that unlock our capacity to create value and 
reinvest for growth:

1. Delivering Predictable Results – Continuous improvement in the performance of our programs, transition our 

challenged development programs into production and mature our management systems and processes.

2. Building a Thriving Organic Growth Engine – Create a growth engine that is consistently bidding and winning new 

contracts to drive industry leading organic growth.

3. Expanding Margins – Drive comprehensive cost management efforts corporate-wide including improvement in gross 

margins across all programs, facilitating clearer accountability and streamlining our structure and processes.

4. Driving Cash Release – Enhance our cash flow conversion, including improvements in delivery and collection.

Our strategies are built around our key strengths as a leading commercial technology company serving the aerospace and 
defense industry. Our strategies include innovation and investment in scaling existing capabilities, as well as augmenting our 
capabilities through an acquisition strategy designed to focus on adjacent technologies. We believe our investment in R&D is 
more than double that of our competitors on a percentage of sales. Our consistent strategies allow us to assist our customers, 
mostly defense prime contractors, to reduce program cost, minimize technical risk, stay on schedule and on budget and ensure 
trust and security in the supply chain. As a result, we have successfully penetrated strategic programs including Aegis, Patriot, 
Lower  Tier  Air  &  Missile  Defense  Sensor  ("LTAMDS"),  Surface  Electronic  Warfare  Improvement  Program  (“SEWIP”), 
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense ("THAAD"), Predator, F-35, Reaper, F-18, F-16 SABR, E2-D Hawkeye, Paveway, Filthy 
Buzzard,  PGK,  P-8,  Advanced  Integrated  Defensive  Electronic  Warfare  Suite  (“AIDEWS”),  Common  Display  System 
(“CDS”), Aviation Mission Common Server ("AMCS") and WIN-T.

We  are  committed  to  continued  investment  and  innovation  in  advanced  new  products  and  solutions  development  to 
maintain our competitive advantage, including in the fields of RF, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog conversion, advanced 
multi-  and  many-core  sensor  processing  systems  including  graphics  processing  units  (“GPUs”),  safety-critical  design  and 
engineering,  processing  for  AI,  embedded  security,  digital  storage,  digital  radio  frequency  memory  (“DRFM”)  solutions, 
software-defined communications capabilities and advanced security technologies and capabilities. Concurrently, we leverage 
our engineering and development capabilities, including systems integration, to accelerate our strategy to become a commercial 
outsourcing  partner  to  the  large  defense  prime  contractors  as  they  seek  the  more  rapid  design,  development  and  delivery  of 
affordable,  commercially-developed,  open  architecture  solutions  within  the  markets  we  serve.  We  invest  in  scalable 
manufacturing operations in the U.S. to enable rapid, cost-effective deployment of our microelectronics and secure processing 
solutions to our customers.

Our  commercial  business  model  positions  us  to  be  compensated  for  non-recurring  engineering  which  supplements  our 
own  internal  R&D  investment.  We  typically  team  concurrently  with  multiple  defense  prime  contractors  as  they  pursue  new 

4

business with solutions they develop and market to the government, and engage with our customers early in the design cycle. 
Our engagement model can lead to long-term production revenue that continues after the initial services are delivered.

We have added capabilities, through both M&A and investment in organic growth, both horizontally – in adjacent markets 

– and vertically – adding more content. For example:

• First, transition to pre-integrated subsystems: Mercury has expanded capabilities, particularly in integrated subsystems 
related to defense threats and increased system complexity, which in turn has driven greater outsourcing to us from our prime 
defense contractor and OEM customers. 

• Second, expansion into new submarkets: Within the major markets Mercury serves we have moved, for example, into 

electronic warfare, weapons systems, acoustics submarkets, C4I and mission computing.

• Third, vertical expansion: As we continue to add content, we seek to apply technology to all computers on aerospace 

and defense platforms that require trusted, safe and secure processing.

• Fourth,  microelectronics:  Our  investment  domestically  in  next-generation  chiplet  technology,  from  chip-scale  to 

system scale.

Since July 2015, we have added substantial capabilities to our technology portfolio including: embedded security, with the 
acquisitions  of  Lewis  Innovative  Technologies  Inc.  (“LIT”),  custom  microelectronics,  RF  and  microwave  solutions  and 
embedded  security,  with  the  carve-out  acquisition  from  Microsemi  Corporation  (the  “Carve-Out  Business”),  The  Athena 
Group, Inc. (“Athena”), Delta Microwave, LLC (“Delta”), Syntonic Microwave LLC (“Syntonic”), Pentek Technologies, LLC 
and Pentek Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Pentek”) and Atlanta Micro, Inc. (“Atlanta Micro”); mission computing, safety-critical 
avionics and platform management and large area display technology with the CES Creative Electronic Systems, S.A. (“CES”), 
Richland  Technologies,  L.L.C.  (“RTL”),  GECO  Avionics,  LLC  (“GECO”),  American  Panel  Corporation  (“APC”),  Physical 
Optics  Corporation  (“POC”)  and  Avalex  Technologies,  LLC.  (“Avalex”)  acquisitions;  and  rugged  servers,  computers  and 
storage systems with the acquisitions of Themis Computer (“Themis”) and Germane Systems, LC (“Germane”).

We believe we have built the most trusted, proven, contemporary portfolio of solutions and sub-systems that are purpose-
built  to  meet  or  exceed  our  customers’  most  pressing  high-tech  needs.  We  are  investing  in  mission-critical  processing 
technologies embedded into the Mercury Processing Platform:

•

Security.  Industry-leading embedded security capabilities, secure supply chain, U.S. manufacturing facilities and data 

management practices for highly sensitive missions.

•

Signal. Broadband microwave technology, high-speed digitization, low-latency processing, purpose-built for mission-

critical applications.

• Display.  Smart,  rugged,  interactive,  high-definition  display  technology  optimized  for  the  low-light,  multi-angle 

viewing requirements of cockpits and armored vehicles.

•

Software.  Advanced  open  middleware  and  software  facilitates  rapid  application  porting  on  top  of  open  mission 

systems architecture.

• Networking. Open, interoperable and secure networking based on widely adopted commercial protocols and standards 

to enable connectivity from data to decision.

•

Storage.  Fast,  radiation-tolerant  and  encrypted  data-at-rest  solutions  to  securely  store  the  vast  amounts  of  data 

produced by sophisticated edge sensors.

• Compute. High-performance, highly reliable, safe, secure and resilient computing leveraging the latest in commercial 

innovation from edge to cloud, ground to space.

Our Solutions and Products

We deliver technology at the intersection of the high-tech and defense industries. The Mercury difference is driven by key 
“differentiators”  we  promise  to  deliver  to  all  of  our  customers:  Mission-Ready;  Trusted  and  Secure;  Software-Defined;  and 
Open and Modular.

• Mission-Ready:  Fit  for  purpose  to  meet  the  demanding  needs  of  our  customers'  missions.  Advanced  thermal 
management  and  rugged  packaging  technology  ensures  optimal  performance  and  reliable  operation  in  the  most  challenging 
environments on earth and beyond. We deliver extended reliability and dependability through thermal management, component 
selection, environmental protection and testing.  

• Trusted  and  Secure:  A  trusted  supply  chain,  with  products  designed  and  manufactured  onshore.  Advanced 
cryptography,  secure  boot  and  physical  protection  technologies  like  our  BuiltSECURE  technology  can  mitigate  reverse 
engineering, deliver cyber resiliency and safeguard confidential data and IP against adversarial threats, even when a system has 
been compromised. We also design safety-certifiable BuiltSAFE processing systems up to the highest design assurance levels.

5

•

Software-Defined: Software enabled hardware for future proofing, rapid scaling, ease of maintenance and affordability.
Flexible hardware architectures that are reconfigurable and upgradeable with software to extend the life of our systems and the 
platforms  they  are  deployed  on.  Our  model-based  systems  engineering  (“MBSE”)  design  approach  aims  to  significantly 
decrease the time and cost involved in developing and deploying military and aerospace platforms.

• Open  and  Modular:  “Plug  and  play”,  upgradeable  and  scalable.  A  modular,  open,  systems  architecture  (“MOSA”)
approach to system design maximizes technology reuse to dramatically reduce development time and cost. This open systems 
approach mitigates obsolescence risk while emphasizing commonality, interoperability and sustainability across platforms and 
domains. 

The  Mercury  Processing  Platform  is  designed  to  meet  the  full  range  of  requirements  in  compute-intensive,  signal 
processing, image processing and command and control applications. To maintain a competitive advantage, we seek to leverage 
technology  investments  across  multiple  product  lines  and  product  solutions.  Examples  of  hardware  products  include  small, 
custom microelectronics, embedded sensor processing subsystems, RF and microwave components, modules and subsystems, 
rugged servers and avionics mission computers.

Our products are typically compute-intensive and require extremely high bandwidth and high throughput. These systems 
often  must  also  meet  significant  size,  weight  and  power  (“SWaP”)  constraints  for  use  in  aircraft,  unmanned  aerial  vehicles 
(“UAVs”),  ships  and  other  platforms  and  be  ruggedized  for  use  in  harsh  environments.  They  are  primarily  used  in  both 
commercial aerospace applications, such as communications and ground radar air traffic control, as well as advanced defense 
and  intelligence  applications,  including  space-time  adaptive  processing,  synthetic  aperture  radar,  airborne  early  warning, 
command,  control,  communication  and  information  systems,  mission  planning,  image  intelligence  and  signal  intelligence 
systems. Our products transform the massive streams of digital data created in these applications into usable information in real 
time. The systems can scale from a few processors to thousands of processors.

We group our products into the following categories:

• Components. Components represent the basic building blocks of an electronic system. They generally perform a single
function  such  as  switching,  storing  or  converting  electronic  signals.  Some  examples  include  power  amplifiers  and  limiters, 
switches, oscillators, filters, equalizers, digital and analog converters, chips, MMICs (monolithic microwave integrated circuits) 
and memory and storage devices.

• Modules and Subassemblies. Modules and sub-assemblies combine multiple components to serve a range of complex
functions, including processing, networking and graphics display. Typically delivered as computer boards or other packaging, 
modules  and  sub-assemblies  are  usually  designed  using  open  standards  to  provide  interoperability  when  integrated  in  a 
subsystem.  Examples  of  modules  and  sub-assemblies  include  embedded  processing  boards,  switched  fabrics  and  boards  for 
high-speed input/output, digital receivers, graphics and video, along with multi-chip modules, integrated radio frequency and 
microwave multi-function assemblies and radio frequency tuners and transceivers.

•

Integrated  Subsystems.  Integrated  subsystems  bring  components,  modules  and/or  sub-assemblies  into  one  system,
enabled with software. Subsystems are typically, but not always, integrated within an open standards-based chassis and often 
feature  interconnect  technologies  to  enable  communication  between  disparate  systems.  Spares  and  replacement  modules  and 
sub-assemblies are provided for use with subsystems sold by us. Our subsystems are deployed in sensor processing, aviation 
and mission computing and C4I applications.

By providing pre-integrated subsystems to our customers, we enable them to rapidly and cost-effectively port and adapt 
their applications to changing threats. This approach also saves our customers valuable time and expense, as their initial costs to 
integrate modules and components typically far exceed the costs of the individual product procurement. This benefit continues 
over  time  because  we  are  continually  investing  R&D  into  our  products.  This  allows  us  to  provide  our  customers  the  latest 
technologies  in  our  pre-integrated  subsystems  faster  than  they  can  typically  do  it  themselves.  We  believe  this  is  a  better 
business and technology model to operate within, as it continues to provide value and benefits to us and our customers over 
time.

To  address  the  current  challenges  facing  the  warfighter,  our  government  and  defense  prime  contractors,  we  have 
developed a new product architecture that supports a more dynamic, iterative, spiral development process by leveraging open 
architecture standards and leading-edge commercial technologies and products. Our open architecture is carried throughout our 
entire product line from the very small form-factor subsystems to the high-end, where ultimate processing power and reliability 
is  of  paramount  importance  to  the  mission.  Our  commercially-developed  product  capabilities  cover  the  entire  intelligence, 
surveillance and reconnaissance (“ISR”) spectrum from acquisition and digitization of the signal, to processing of the signal, 
through the exploitation and dissemination of the information. We work continuously to improve our hardware technology with 
an eye toward optimization of SWaP demands. 

We partner with global tech leaders to align technology roadmaps and deliver cutting-edge computing in scalable, field-
deployable form factors that are fully configurable to each unique workload. We use the latest Intel® server-class processing 

6

products,  AMD  Field  Programmable  Gate  Arrays  (“FPGA”),  as  well  as  NVIDIA  GPU  products  in  our  embedded  high-
performance  processing  technologies.  While  this  multi-computing  and  embedded  processing  technology  is  one  of  our  core 
capabilities,  the  SWaP  constraints  inherent  in  high-performance  embedded  processing  applications  create  unique  challenges. 
For example, to deal with the heat build-up involved in fanless compact rugged subsystems, we introduced a key technology 
called Air Flow-By™ that enables previously unattainable levels of processing power within a small footprint by effectively 
removing heat so server-class processors can perform at maximum designed power limits. In environments where air is limited, 
such  as  high-altitude  operations,  our  Liquid-Flow-By™  technology  allows  maximum  server-class  processor  performance. 
These innovative cooling techniques allow full performance server-class processing in rugged environments enabling new and 
advanced  modes  of  operation  that  enhance  the  multi-intelligence,  situational  awareness  and  electronic  warfare  capabilities  in 
military platforms.

Embedded systems security has become a requirement for new and emerging military programs and our security solutions 
are a critical differentiator from our traditional competition. These security solutions, combined with our next-generation secure 
Intel® server-class product line, together with increasingly frequent mandates from the government to secure electronic systems 
for domestic and foreign military sales, position us well to capitalize on DoD program protection security requirements. Finally, 
our built-in security framework creates higher product differentiation, and drives greater program velocity, while lowering risk.

Open Standards Support

Mercury  has  a  long  history  of  driving  modular  open  systems  architectures  and  has  remained  committed  to  creating, 
advancing and adopting open standards for all our products, from our smallest components and connectors to our largest, high-
performance,  integrated  multi-computer  systems.  With  forty  years  of  technology  leadership  within  the  high-performance 
embedded computing industry, we have pioneered or contributed to the development of many of the defense industry’s current 
and  emerging  open  standards,  including  standards  such  as  RACEway,  RapidIO,  VXS,  VPX,  REDI  and  notably  OpenVPX. 
These open standards allow system integrators to benefit from the interoperability of modules produced by multiple vendors. 
We also continue to be influential in the industry-standards organizations associated with our market segments. As a member of 
the VMEbus International Trade Association (“VITA”), the Sensor Open Systems Architecture (“SOSA”) initiative, the Future 
Airborne  Capability  Environment  (“FACE”)  consortium  and  the  Vehicular  Integration  for  C4ISR/EW  Interoperability 
(“VICTORY”)  consortium,  among  other  standards  bodies,  Mercury  is  helping  to  guide  the  aerospace  and  defense  industry 
toward greater openness and vendor interoperability, consistent with the DoD’s focus on using MOSA in major programs.

Our software is based on open standards and includes heterogeneous processor support with extensive highly-optimized 
math  libraries,  multi-computing  switch  fabric  support,  net-centric  and  system  management  enabling  services,  extended 
operating system services, board support packages and development tools. This software platform delivers on the performance 
required for highly tuned real-time operation with the flexibility of open standards that are an essential ingredient of technology 
insertion and software life-cycle support.

As  the  U.S.  government  mandates  more  outsourcing  and  open  standards,  a  major  shift  is  occurring  within  the  defense 
prime contractor community towards procurement of integrated subsystems that enable quick application level porting through 
standards-based methodologies. We believe that our core expertise in this area is well aligned to capitalize on this trend. By 
leveraging our open architecture and high-performance modular product set, we provide defense prime contractors with rapid 
deployment and quick reaction capabilities through our professional services and systems integration offerings. This results in 
less risk for the defense prime contractors, shortened development cycles, quicker solution deployment and reduced life-cycle 
costs.

Commitment to Deliver Uncompromised

For Mercury, this means ensuring our products and solutions have not been and cannot be tampered with, and that what 
we  deliver  to  our  customers  is  not  compromised  at  any  point  during  the  development  lifecycle,  from  procurement  to 
manufacturing. Our holistic approach to deliver uncompromised includes:

•

•

•

•

vigorously mitigating potential insider threats;

proactively protecting our IT infrastructure with strong cybersecurity defenses;

effectively managing and assessing our suppliers’ controls; and

judiciously controlling design information through the entire development process.

We  are  investing  in  digital  transformation,  insider  trust,  cybersecurity,  supply  chain  management  and  trusted 

microelectronics, all integral to our commitment to being a leader in delivering uncompromised solutions to our customers.

7

Recent Acquisitions

Since  2015  we  have  acquired  and  integrated  15  businesses.  These  acquisitions  have  expanded  Mercury’s  technology 
portfolio with capabilities such as digital signal processing products, high-performance RF modules and components, rugged 
avionics  and  electronics,  and  safety-certifiable  subsystems.  The  five  acquisitions  completed  since  July  1,  2019  are  shown 
below.

Name of Acquired Entities

American Panel Corporation

Physical Optics Corporation

Pentek Systems, Inc. and Pentek Technologies, LLC

Avalex Technologies, LLC

Atlanta Micro, Inc.

Our Market Opportunity

Date of Acquisition

September 23, 2019

December 30, 2020

May 27, 2021

November 5, 2021

November 29, 2021

Our  market  opportunity  is  defined  by  the  growing  demand  for  domestically  designed,  sourced  and  manufactured 
electronics for critical aerospace, defense and intelligence applications. Our primary market positioning is centered on making 
commercially available technologies profoundly more accessible to the aerospace and defense sector, specifically as it relates to 
C4I  systems,  sensors  and  EW;  and  commercial  markets,  which  include  aerospace  communications  and  other  computing 
applications. We believe we are well-positioned in growing sustainable market segments of the aerospace and defense sector 
that  rely  on  advanced  technologies  to  improve  warfighter  capability  and  provide  enhanced  force  protection  capabilities.  The 
acquisitions  of  the  Carve-Out  Business,  Delta,  Syntonic,  Pentek  and  Atlanta  Micro  further  improved  our  ability  to  compete 
successfully in these market segments by allowing us to offer an even more comprehensive set of closely related capabilities. 
The  CES,  RTL,  GECO,  APC,  POC  and  Avalex  acquisitions  provided  us  new  capabilities  that  substantially  expanded  our 
addressable market into defense platform management, mission computing and commercial aerospace markets that are aligned 
to our existing market focus. The additions of Themis and Germane provided us with new capabilities and positioned us with a 
significant footprint within the rugged server business. Our organic investments as well as the acquisitions of LIT, the Carve-
Out  Business  and  Athena  added  to  our  portfolio  of  embedded  security  products  that  can  be  leveraged  across  our  business. 
Finally,  our  CES  addition,  due  to  its  location  in  Geneva,  Switzerland  is  helping  to  open  more  opportunities  in  international 
markets.

We believe there are a number of evolving trends that are reshaping our target markets and accordingly provide us with 

attractive growth opportunities. These trends include:

•The  aerospace  and  defense  electronics  market  is  expected  to  grow  in  2023  and  beyond.  According  to  Renaissance 
Strategic Advisors (“RSA”), as of June 2023, the global aerospace and defense electronics market is estimated to be 
$148 billion in 2023, growing to $199 billion by 2028. Within this global market, RSA estimates that the total Tier 2 
defense electronics market, which Mercury participates in, was approximately $48 billion in 2023, and will grow to 
$67 billion in 2028. The aerospace and defense electronics marketplace consists of two primary subsegments: (i) C4I 
and  (ii)  sensor  and  effector  mission  systems.  C4I  encompasses  platform  and  mission  management,  which  include 
avionics  and  vetronics,  C2I,  which  includes  command  and  control  and  intelligence,  and  dedicated  communications 
processing. Sensor and effector mission systems are primarily different types of sensor modalities such as EW, radar, 
EO/IR and acoustics as well as weapons systems such as missiles and munitions. Within the global Tier 2 C4I market 
in which we participate, RSA estimated the market for 2023 to be $7.7 billion for platform and mission management, 
$9.7 billion for C2I and $10.2 billion for dedicated communications. RSA estimates the compound annual growth rate 
(“CAGR”)  from  2023-2028  for  these  markets  to  be  5.9%  for  platform  and  mission  management,  6.6%  for  C2I  and 
6.9% for dedicated communications. Within the global Tier 2 sensor and effector mission systems market in which we 
participate, RSA estimated the market for 2023 to be $6.0 billion for EW, $6.6 billion for radar, $2.7 billion for EO/IR, 
$1.4 billion for acoustics and $3.9 billion for weapons systems. RSA estimates the 2023-2028 CAGR for these markets 
to be 6.7% for EW, 6.5% for radar, 7.6% for EO/IR, 6.8% for acoustics and 8.4% for weapons systems. Within the 
context  of  the  overall  U.S.  defense  budget  and  spending  for  defense  electronics  specifically,  we  believe  the  C4ISR, 
EW, guided missiles and precision munitions and ballistic missile defense market segments have a high priority for 
future DoD spending. We continue to build on our strengths in the design and development of performance optimized 
electronic  subsystems  for  these  markets,  and  often  team  with  multiple  defense  prime  contractors  as  they  bid  for 
projects,  thereby  increasing  our  chance  of  a  successful  outcome.  We  expect  to  return  to  our  above  industry-average 
growth.

•The rapidly expanding demand for tactical ISR is leading to significant growth in sensor data being generated, leading 
to even greater demand for the capability of our products to securely store and process data onboard platforms. An 

8

increase in the prevalence and resolution of ISR is generating significant growth in the associated data that needs to be 
stored and turned into information for the warfighter in a timely manner. In addition, several factors are driving the 
defense and intelligence industries to demand greater capability to collect, store and process data onboard the aircraft, 
UAVs,  ships  and  other  vehicles,  which  we  refer  to  collectively  as  platforms.  These  factors  include  the  limited 
communications  bandwidth  of  existing  platforms,  the  need  for  platforms  that  can  operate  more  autonomously  and 
possibly in denied communications environments, the need for platforms with increased persistence to enable them to 
remain in or fly above the battlefield for extended periods and the need for greater onboard processing capabilities. In 
addition,  the  advent  of  sophisticated  AI  algorithms  is  beginning  to  revolutionize  the  ability  of  sensor  processing 
systems  to  intelligently  and  efficiently  process  and  act  upon  these  large  data  sets.  Standard  computing  architectures 
and computing platforms currently do not offer the level of performance needed to optimize existing AI algorithms, 
creating an additional opportunity for advanced processing capabilities onboard the platform.

•Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, rising tensions in the Asia-Pacific and continued threats from rogue states and violent 
extremists  are  contributing  to  the  most  challenging  global  threat  environment  since  the  Cold  War.  This  will  likely 
result in a sea change in defense spending domestically and internationally. Our advisors estimate that U.S. growth, 
combined with increases in NATO defense budgets, could drive up to $1.5 trillion of additional spending over the next 
decade. This should lead to higher bookings for Mercury in the electronic systems associated with missiles, munitions 
and missile defense systems, unmanned systems, fixed wing and rotorcraft, ground vehicles and EW. 

•A  greater  percentage  of  the  value  associated  with  future  defense  platforms  will  be  driven  by  electronic  systems 
content,  and  upgrades  to  existing  platforms  will  focus  on  sensors,  signal  processing,  sensor  algorithms,  multi-
intelligence  fusion  and  exploitation  and  computing  and  communications  capability  –  all  areas  where  Mercury 
participates. These trends remain favorable in our view and the demand environment is improving due to urgent needs 
for  warfighting  capability  at  a  more  rapid  pace  than  traditional  defense  prime  contractors  can  easily  react  to,  as 
demonstrated  by  our  strong  bookings  and  design  wins,  in  fiscal  2023.  We  believe  that  our  addressable  market 
continues  to  increase,  driven  in  large  part  by  our  strategic  move  into  mission  systems  and  potential  to  deliver 
innovative processing solutions at chip scale, and that primes will increasingly seek out our high-performance, cost-
effective open architecture products.

•Defense  procurement  reform  is  causing  the  defense  prime  contractors  to  outsource  more  work  to  commercial 
companies and we believe that prime contractor outsourcing is our largest secular growth opportunity. RSA estimates 
that in 2023 the U.S. defense Tier 2 embedded computing and RF market addressable by suppliers such as Mercury 
was approximately $25 billion. RSA estimates that the U.S. defense prime contractors currently outsource only a small 
percentage of their work. On a global basis the Tier 2 embedded computing and RF market in 2023 was estimated by 
RSA to be $48 billion. The U.S. government is intensely focused on making systems more affordable and shortening 
their  development  time.  In  addition,  the  U.S.  government  is  challenging  defense  prime  contractors  to  leverage 
commercial technology wherever possible. This trend, along with a scarcity of technical and engineering talent in the 
market, is causing defense prime contractors to outsource to companies like Mercury, which we believe is our largest 
secular growth opportunity. As a merchant supplier of commercial technologies to the defense industry, we believe our 
products and subsystem solutions are often more affordable than solutions with the same functionality developed by a 
defense prime contractor. In addition, we believe our size, scale and stability in addition to the investments we have 
made in our domestic manufacturing capabilities and infrastructure, make us a more reliable and attractive outsourcing 
partner  for  our  customers  relative  to  smaller  sub-scale  providers.  These  factors  are  providing  incentives  for  defense 
prime  contractors  to  outsource  more  work  to  subcontractors  with  significant  expertise  and  cost-effective  technology 
capabilities  and  solutions,  and  we  have  transformed  our  business  model  over  the  last  several  years  to  address  these 
long-term outsourcing trends and other needs.

•DoD  security  and  program  protection  requirements  are  creating  new  opportunities  for  domestic  sourcing  and  our 
advanced secure processing capabilities. The U.S. government is focused on ensuring that the U.S. military protects 
its  defense  electronic  systems  and  the  information  held  within  them  from  nefarious  activities  such  as  tampering, 
reverse engineering and other forms of advanced attacks, including cyber. The requirement to add security comes at a 
time  when  the  commercial  technology  world  continues  to  offshore  more  of  the  design,  development,  manufacturing 
and  support  of  such  capabilities,  making  it  more  difficult  to  protect  against  embedded  vulnerabilities,  tampering, 
reverse engineering and other undesired activities. The DoD has a mandate to ensure both the provenance and integrity 
of the technology and its associated supply chain. These factors have created a unique opportunity for us to expand 
beyond sensor processing into the provision of technologies ranging from advanced secure processing subsystems to 
miniaturized  custom  microelectronics  devices  and  capabilities  for  other  onboard  critical  computing  applications 
designed, developed, manufactured and supported in the U.S.A. In addition, advanced systems sold to foreign military 
buyers  also  require  protection  so  that  the  technologies,  techniques  and  data  associated  with  them  do  not  proliferate, 
which further enhances our market opportunity.

9

•Mercury is well-positioned to help address the need for DoD to access the latest commercial silicon, combined with 
the desire to ensure a trusted domestic supply of silicon technologies. In May 2023, DoD’s National Defense Science 
and  Technology  Strategy  listed  microelectronics  among  its  critical  technology  areas  for  investment.  DoD’s  FY23 
budget  requested  $3.3  billion  to  fund  microelectronics  research  and  development  initiatives,  a  historically  large 
increase in funding. Congress’ passage of the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (“CHIPS”) act 
in August 2022, which will provide $2 billion for defense microelectronics, further amplifies the U.S. government’s 
commitment  to  reinforcing  the  U.S.  semiconductor  supply  chain.  We  believe  Mercury  is  the  leading  provider  of 
commercially developed silicon purpose-built for the specific requirements of aerospace and defense customers. This 
capability  began  with  our  2016  acquisition  of  the  Carve-Out  Business,  which  included  capabilities  in  trusted  and 
secure  microelectronics.  Since  the  acquisition,  we  have  made  additional  investments  in  security  and  advanced 
packaging,  most  notably  our  announced  $15  million  capital  investment  in  fiscal  year  2020  to  expand  our  trusted 
custom  microelectronics  business  in  Phoenix,  Arizona,  to  bring  cutting-edge  commercial  silicon  to  the  DoD.  This 
initiative is specifically intended to bridge DoD technologies from monolithic ASIC designs, which are purpose-built 
for DoD but are deployed on legacy silicon designs, to heterogeneous “chiplet” architectures, which leverage best-of-
breed  silicon  from  commercial  providers  and  packages  the  silicon  for  defense-specific  applications,  including  the 
ability to embed security into the device itself.

Our Competitive Strengths 

We believe the following competitive strengths will allow us to take advantage of the evolving trends in our industry and 

successfully pursue our business strategy:

•Subsystem Solutions Provider for the C4ISR and Electronic Warfare Markets. Through our commercially developed, 
specialized processing subsystem solutions, we address the challenges associated with the collection and processing of 
massive, continuous streams of data and dramatically shorten the time that it takes to give information to U.S. armed 
forces at the tactical edge. Our solutions are specifically designed for flexibility and interoperability, allowing our 
products to be easily integrated into larger system-level solutions. Our ability to integrate subsystem-level capabilities 
allows us to provide solutions that effectively address the mission-critical challenges within the C4ISR market, 
including multi-intelligence data fusion and AI processing onboard the platform. We leverage our deep expertise in 
embedded multicomputing, embedded sensor processing, with the addition of our RF microwave and millimeter 
subsystems and components, along with strategic investments in research and development to provide solutions across 
the sensor processing chain.

•Diverse Mix of Stable, Growth Programs Aligned with DoD Funding Priorities. Our products and solutions have been 
deployed on more than 300 different programs and over 25 different defense prime contractors. We serve high priority 
markets for the DoD and foreign militaries, such as UAVs, ballistic missile defense, guided missiles and precision 
munitions, airborne reconnaissance, electronic warfare and have secured positions on mission-critical programs 
including Aegis, Predator and Reaper UAVs, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, LTAMDS, Patriot missile, SEWIP and 
Paveway. In addition, we consistently leverage our technology and capabilities across multiple programs, providing 
significant operating leverage and cost savings. Our acquisitions allow us to participate in a broader array of programs, 
many with key strategic customers of ours.

•We are a leading technology company serving the aerospace and defense industry. We have a portfolio of Open 
Standards Architecture (“OSA”) technology building blocks across the entire sensor processing chain. We offer 
embedded secure processing capabilities with advanced packaging and cooling technologies that ruggedize 
commercial technologies while allowing them to stay cool for reliable operation. These capabilities allow us to help 
our customers meet the demanding SWaP requirements of today’s defense platforms. Our pre-integrated subsystems 
improve affordability by substantially reducing customer system integration costs and time-to-market for our solutions. 
System integration costs are one of the more substantial costs our customers bear in developing and deploying 
technologies in defense programs and platforms. Our pre-integrated solutions approach allows for more rapid and 
affordable modernization of existing platforms and faster deployment of new platforms.

Our strengths in this area include our position as an early and leading advocate for OSA in defense, offering Intel® server 
class processing form factors across 3/6U OpenVPX, ATCA and rack-mount architectures and high density, secure solutions 
across  multiple  hardware  architectures  to  seamlessly  scale  to  meet  our  customers’  SWaP  requirements.  In  addition,  we  have 
a  30-year  legacy  of  system  management  and  system  integration  expertise  that  allows  us  to  reduce  technical  risk,  while 
improving  affordability  and  interoperability.  Our  system  integration  expertise  is  a  cornerstone  in  helping  us  support  our 
customers in deploying pre-integrated, OSA subsystems.

As  commercial  technology  companies  have  moved  the  design,  development,  manufacturing  and  support  of  their 
technologies offshore, the DoD is looking to domestic technology providers to develop a sustainable, U.S.-based trusted supply 
chain.  Over  several  years  we  have  been  building  out  our  capacity  for  domestic  manufacturing  through  our  Advanced 

10

Microelectronics  Centers  (“AMCs”).  These  facilities  provide  significant  scale  and  capacity  for  our  defense  prime  customers, 
who  have  been  increasingly  willing  to  outsource  to  partners  with  the  scale  needed  to  meet  large  program  production 
requirements.  In  addition,  our  Phoenix,  Arizona  AMC  is  a  Defense  Microelectronics  Activity  (“DMEA”)-certified,  trusted 
manufacturing facility, which represents a significant competitive advantage. Our Phoenix AMC also includes a surface mount 
technology manufacturing capability which we refer to as our U.S. Manufacturing Operations (“USMO”).

•We provide advanced, integrated security features for our products and subsystems, addressing an increasingly 
prevalent requirement for DoD program security. We offer secure processing expertise that is built-in to our pre-
integrated subsystems. By doing this we are able to provide secure building blocks that allow our customers to also 
incorporate their own security capabilities. This assists our customers in ensuring program protection as they deploy 
critical platforms and programs, all in support of DoD missions. The acquisition of the Carve-Out Business brought us 
new security technologies and also allowed us to provide enhanced security capabilities in areas such as memory and 
storage devices. Our acquisitions of the Carve-Out Business, LIT and Athena also added to our portfolio of 
sophisticated firmware and software specifically designed to secure microelectronic devices that can be leveraged 
across our product portfolio.

•We are pioneering a next generation defense business model. The DoD and the defense industrial base is currently 
undergoing a major transformation. Domestic political and budget uncertainty, geopolitical instability and evolving 
global threats have become constants. The defense budget remains under pressure and R&D and technology spending 
are often in budgetary competition with the increasing costs of military personnel requirements, health care costs and 
other important elements within the DoD and the federal budget generally. Finally, defense acquisition reform calls for 
the continued drive for innovation and competition within the defense industrial base, while also driving down 
acquisition costs. Our approach is built around a few key pillars:

• The mission-ready products in our portfolio can be incorporated into aerospace and defense platforms in their 

standard commercial forms or customized to meet unique program requirements.

• We continue to leverage our expertise in building pre-integrated subsystems in support of critical defense 

programs, driving out procurement costs by lowering integration expenses of our customers.

• We have been a pioneer in driving OSA for both embedded computing and RF.

• The DoD has asked defense industry participants to invest their own resources into R&D. This approach is a 

pillar of our business model.

• Security and program protection are now critical considerations for both program modernizations as well as 
for new program deployment. We are now in our fourth generation of building secure embedded processing 
solutions.

We have a next generation business model built to meet the emerging needs of the DoD.

•Value-Added Subsystem Solution Provider for Defense Prime Contractors. Because of the DoD’s continuing shift 
toward a firm fixed price contract procurement model, an increasingly uncertain budgetary and procurement 
environment, and increased budget pressures from both the U.S. and allied governments, defense prime contractors are 
accelerating their move toward outsourcing opportunities to help mitigate the increased program and financial risk. 
Our differentiated secure sensor and safety-critical processing solutions offer meaningful capabilities upgrades for our 
customers and enable the rapid, cost-effective deployment of systems to the end customer. We believe our open 
architecture subsystems offer differentiated sensor processing and data analytics capabilities that cannot be easily 
replicated. Our solutions minimize program risk, maximize application portability and accelerate customers’ time to 
market, all within a fixed-pricing contracting environment.

•Delivery of Platform-Ready Solutions for Classified Programs. We believe our integration work provides us with 
critical insights as we implement and incorporate key classified government intellectual property, including critical 
intelligence and signal processing algorithms, into advanced systems. This integration work provides us the 
opportunity to combine directly and integrate our technology building blocks along with our intellectual property into 
our existing embedded processing products and solutions, enabling us to deliver more affordable, platform-ready 
integrated ISR subsystems that leverage our OSA and address key government technology and procurement concerns. 
Our operations in this environment also help us identify emerging needs and opportunities to influence our future 
product development, so that critical future needs can be met in a timely manner with commercially-developed 
products and solutions.

•We have invested in advanced, domestic design and manufacturing capabilities. We have prioritized investments to 
build our internal capabilities and capacity for defense electronics design and manufacturing in the U.S. These 
investments include the consolidation of a number of sub-scale microelectronics manufacturing facilities into our 
modern AMCs as well as the establishment of our USMO in Phoenix, Arizona. In addition to the consolidation of 

11

facilities into scalable engineering and manufacturing centers of excellence, we have made the necessary investments 
to outfit these facilities with modern, scalable and redundant tools and equipment to promote quality, efficiency, 
throughput and redundancy. In addition we invested in our information technology (“IT”) infrastructure and business 
systems to meet Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) requirements for cybersecurity. 
These investments taken together are intended to demonstrate our commitment to meeting DoD expectations for a 
trusted and secure defense industrial base. Our AMCs in Hudson, New Hampshire, West Caldwell, New Jersey, 
Oxnard, California, Huntsville, Alabama, Phoenix, Arizona and Torrance, California are strategically located near key 
customers and are purpose-built for the design, build and test of RF components and subsystems in support of a variety 
of key customer programs. Our USMO is built around scalable, repeatable, secure, affordable and predictable 
manufacturing. The USMO is a IPC1791 certified secure trusted site, certified to AS9100 quality standards and it 
utilizes Lean Six Sigma methodologies throughout manufacturing. The USMO is designed for efficient manufacturing, 
enabling our customers to access the best proven technology and high performing, secure processing solutions. This 
allows for the most repeatable product performance, while optimizing affordability and production responsiveness. 

•Long-Standing Industry Relationships. We have established long-standing relationships with defense prime 
contractors, the U.S. government and other key organizations in the defense industry over our 30 years in the defense 
electronics industry. Our top customers include Airbus, BAE Systems, Boeing, General Atomics, General Dynamics, 
L3Harris Technologies, Leonardo, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, RTX Corporation 
(formerly known as Raytheon Technologies) and the U.S. Navy. Over this period, we have become recognized for our 
ability to develop new technologies and meet stringent program requirements. We believe we are well-positioned to 
maintain these high-level customer engagements and enhance them through the additional relationships that our 
recently acquired businesses have with many of the same customers.

•

Operational Execution Experience. The members of our leadership team possess extensive expertise within the 
aerospace, defense, and technology industries. Their collective history of building management systems and processes 
has consistently proven to successfully scale and grow a business to enhance overall returns. They also bring 
experience in effectively implementing operational transformations that deliver strong results and drive long-term 
value creation. Our leadership team is focused on operational execution, including setting clear priorities, developing 
the appropriate processes and systems, and delivering results. We are focused on four priorities to unlock capacity to 
create value and reinvest for growth. They include: delivering predictable results, build a thriving growth engine, 
expanding margins, and driving cash release. We are confident that we have assembled the necessary expertise to 
continue to grow and scale our business.

•Mature M&A Origination and Execution Capability. We have a strong track-record of identifying and executing 
strategic acquisitions. Since July 1, 2015 we have acquired 15 businesses, which are strategically aligned with 
Mercury, successfully completing integration of the earlier acquired businesses with the integration of the more recent 
acquisitions progressing well. We have established an internal team that brings decades of experience across more than 
100 transactions. We have developed internal processes to identify and source strategic acquisitions on a proprietary 
basis and negotiated directly with owners on a number of acquisitions. Our internal capabilities include financial, legal 
and other transaction diligence, deal valuation and deal negotiations. 

•Proven M&A Integration Capability. We have developed the internal processes and capability to integrate acquired 
businesses to deliver value through revenue and cost synergies. Overseen by our Execution Excellence organization, 
we leverage our common cultures and values as well as common processes, business systems, tools, channels and 
manufacturing infrastructure to accelerate growth and improve profitability in our acquired businesses.

Competition

We  operate  in  a  highly  competitive  marketplace  characterized  by  rapidly  changing  technology,  frequent  product 
performance improvements, increasing speed of deployment to align with warfighters’ needs and evolving industry standards 
and  requirements  coming  from  our  customers  or  the  DoD.  Competition  typically  occurs  at  the  design  stage  of  a  prospective 
customer’s product, where the customer evaluates alternative technologies and design approaches. We work with defense prime 
contractors  as  well  as  directly  with  the  DoD.  We  help  drive  subsystem  development  and  deployment  in  both  classified  and 
unclassified environments.

The principal competitive factors in our market are price/performance value proposition, available new products at the 
time of design win engagement, services and systems integration capability, effective marketing and sales efforts and reputation 
in  the  market.  Our  competitive  strengths  include  rapid,  innovative  engineering  in  both  hardware  and  software  products, 
subsystem design expertise, advanced packaging capability to deliver the most optimized SWaP solution possible, our ability to 
respond rapidly to varied customer requirements and a track record of successfully supporting many high profile programs in 
the defense market. There are competitors in the different market segments and application types in which we participate. Some 
of these competitors are larger and have greater resources than us. Some of these competitors compete against us at purely a 

12

component or board-level, others at a subsystem level. We also compete with in-house design teams at our customers. The DoD 
as well as the defense prime contractors are pushing for more outsourcing of subsystem designs to mitigate risk and to enable 
concurrent  design  of  the  platform  which  ultimately  leads  to  faster  time  to  deployment.  We  have  aligned  our  strategy  to 
capitalize on that trend and are leveraging our long standing subsystem expertise to provide this value to our customers.

Research and Product Development

Our R&D efforts are focused on developing new products and subsystems as well as enhancing existing hardware and 
software products in mission, signal and image processing. Our R&D goal is to fully exploit and maintain our technological 
lead  in  the  high-performance,  real-time  sensor  processing  industry  and  in  mission  computing,  microelectronics,  platform 
management  and  other  safety-critical  applications.  Total  expenditures  for  research  and  development  amounted  to  $108.8 
million, $107.2 million and $113.5 million in fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, we had 918 
employees,  including  hardware  and  software  architects  and  design  engineers,  primarily  engaged  in  engineering  and  research 
and product development activities. These individuals, in conjunction with our sales team, also devote a portion of their time to 
assisting customers in utilizing our products, developing new uses for these products and anticipating customer requirements 
for new products.

Manufacturing  

The  majority  of  our  sales  are  produced  in  AS9100  quality  system-certified  facilities.  The  current  scope  of  delivered 
hardware  products  includes  commercial  and  industrial  class  printed  circuit  board  assemblies  (modules),  complex  chassis 
subsystems, rugged display system and servers and RF and microwave components and subsystems.

Our Phoenix, Arizona facility manufactures our custom microelectronics products in an AS9100 quality system-certified 
facility while our USMO facility is an IPC1791 certified and DMEA-certified trusted manufacturing facility and is primarily 
focused  on  advanced  secure  system-on-chip  design,  assembly,  packaging  and  test.  Our  Cypress,  California,  West  Lafayette, 
Indiana, and Huntsville, Alabama facilities are AS9100 quality systems-certified facilities as well. Our Fremont, California and 
Alpharetta,  Georgia  facilities  are  ISO  9001:2015  quality  systems-certified.  Our  Hudson,  New  Hampshire  and  Chantilly, 
Virginia locations are IPC1791 and AS9100 quality systems-certified facility. Our Andover, Massachusetts and Hudson, New 
Hampshire  facilities  design  and  assemble  our  processing  products  and  are  AS9100  quality  systems-certified  facilities.  Our 
Andover, Massachusetts facility is also a DMEA-certified trusted design facility and is primarily focused on advanced security 
features for the processing product line. Our Geneva, Switzerland facility, the headquarters of Mercury's European operations, 
provides  electronic  design  and  manufacturing,  maintenance  and  support  services  and  is  AS9100  and  EASA  Part  145  quality 
systems-certified. Our Silchester, England facility provides engineering, development and integration services and is AS9100 
quality systems-certified.

We rely on both vertical integration and subcontracting to contract manufacturers to meet our manufacturing needs. Our 
USMO  and  Geneva  facilities  have  the  manufacturing  capabilities  to  complete  the  assembly  and  testing  for  certain  of  our 
embedded multi-computing products. We subcontract as needed a portion of the assembly and testing for our other embedded 
multi-computing  products  to  contract  manufacturers  in  the  U.S.  to  build  to  our  specifications.  Our  printed  circuit  board 
assemblies  and  chassis  subsystems’  manufacturing  operations  also  consist  of  materials  planning  and  procurement,  final 
assembly and test and logistics (inventory and traffic management). Our vertically integrated subsystem product solutions rely 
on  strong  relationships  with  strategic  suppliers  to  ensure  on-time  delivery  and  high  quality  products.  We  manage  supplier 
performance and capability through quality audits and stringent source, incoming and/or first article inspection processes. We 
have  a  comprehensive  quality  and  process  control  plan  for  each  of  our  products,  which  include  a  supply  chain  management 
program  and  the  use  of  automated  inspection  and  test  equipment  to  assure  the  quality  and  reliability  of  our  products.  We 
perform  most  post  sales  service  obligations  (both  warranty  and  other  lifecycle  support)  in-house  through  a  dedicated  service 
and repair operation. We periodically review our contract manufacturing capabilities to ensure we are optimized for the right 
mix of quality, affordability, performance and on-time delivery.

Our AMC in Phoenix, Arizona is built around scalable, repeatable, secure, affordable and predictable manufacturing. The 
high  mix,  low  volume  and  high  complexity/density  nature  of  our  products  require  speed  and  seamless  interaction  with  all 
internal functions (as opposed to with an external contract manufacturer) which is a key value proposition of the USMO. The 
USMO is also designed for efficient showcasing to customers who at any point wish to access the best proven technology and 
high  performing,  secure  electronics  and  processing  manufacturing  solutions  within  a  broader  product  company  such  as 
Mercury. Proximity and interaction with our internal engineering organization is a significant benefit. This allows for the most 
repeatable  product  performance,  while  optimizing  affordability  and  production  responsiveness.  The  Phoenix  AMC  also 
provides  manufacturing  and  assembly  for  SWaP-optimized  multi-chip  modules  and  system-in-package  devices.  We  combine 
surface-mount,  flip  chip,  die  attach,  wire  bond  and  rugged  3D  packaging  on  the  same  devices  to  provide  a  swap-optimized 
solution for our customers.

The  Hudson,  New  Hampshire,  West  Caldwell,  New  Jersey  and  Oxnard,  California  facilities  are  specifically  aimed  at 
providing  scalable  manufacturing  within  our  critical  businesses.  We  leverage  best  practices  in  design,  development, 

13

manufacturing  and  materials  handling  at  these  production  and  subsystems  integration  facilities.  These  facilities  include  the 
design, build and test of both RF and microwave components and subsystems in support of a variety of key customer programs.  
Our  Alpharetta,  Georgia  facility  offers  active  matrix  liquid  crystal  display  systems  which  enhances  the  highly  sophisticated 
man/machine  interface.  Our  facility  in  Torrance,  California  is  an  AS9100  and  AS9110C  facility  that  offers  Avionics  Safety-
Certifiable  subsystems.  Our  facility  in  Upper  Saddle  River,  New  Jersey  is  ISO  9001:2015  certified  and  offers  digital  signal 
processing products. Our facility in Gulf Breeze, Florida is AS9100 certified and offers rugged avionics and electronics. Our 
facility in Norcross, Georgia is AS9100 certified and offers RF and microwave products. 

Although  we  generally  use  standard  parts  and  components  for  our  products,  certain  components,  including  custom 
designed ASICs, static random access memory, FPGAs, microprocessors and other third party chassis peripherals (single board 
computers, power supplies, blowers, etc.), are currently available only from a single source or from limited sources. 

We also design, develop and manufacture DRFM units for a variety of modern electronic warfare applications, as well as 
radar environment simulation and test systems for defense and intelligence applications. We develop high performance signals 
intelligence payloads and EO/IR technologies for small UAV platforms as well as powerful onboard UAV processor systems 
for real-time wide area motion imagery.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

We  hold  a  broad  collection  of  intellectual  property  rights  to  protect  our  proprietary  technology  and  our  brand.    This 
includes  patents,  designs,  copyrights,  trademarks  and  trade  secrets  in  the  U.S.  and  various  foreign  countries.  Although  we 
believe  the  ownership  of  such  intellectual  property  rights  is  an  important  factor  in  differentiating  our  business  and  that  our 
success depends in part on such ownership, we rely primarily on the innovation skills and technical expertise of our employees.

We  regularly  file  patent  and  trademark  applications  and  continuations  to  protect  innovations  arising  from  our  research 
and  development.  We  also  rely  on  a  combination  of  trade  secret,  copyright  and  trademark  laws,  as  well  as  contractual 
agreements, to safeguard our proprietary rights in technology and products. In seeking to limit access to sensitive information to 
the greatest practical extent, we routinely enter into confidentiality and assignment of invention agreements with each of our 
employees and consultants and nondisclosure agreements with our customers and vendors.

We have licensed in the past, and expect that we may license in the future, certain of our rights to other parties. Some of 
our products are designed to include intellectual property owned by third parties. It may be necessary in the future to seek or 
renew licenses to various aspects of our products, processes and services.

Over time, we have accumulated a meaningful portfolio of issued and registered intellectual property rights. No single 
intellectual property right is solely responsible for protecting our products, processes and services. We believe the duration of 
our intellectual property rights is adequate relative to the expected lives of our products, processes and services.

Backlog

As of June 30, 2023, we had a backlog of orders aggregating approximately $1,139.8 million, of which $716.4 million is 
expected to be recognized as revenue within the next twelve months. As of July 1, 2022, backlog was approximately $1,037.7 
million.  Our  backlog  is  comprised  of  accepted  purchase  orders  for  which  a  majority  are  fully  funded.  Orders  included  in 
backlog may be canceled or rescheduled by customers, although the customer may incur cancellation penalties depending on 
the  timing  of  the  cancellation.  A  variety  of  conditions,  both  specific  to  the  individual  customer  and  generally  affecting  the 
customer’s  industry,  may  cause  customers  to  cancel,  reduce  or  delay  orders  that  were  previously  made  or  anticipated.  We 
cannot assure the timely replacement of canceled, delayed or reduced orders. 

Employees

At June 30, 2023, we employed a total of 2,596 people excluding contractors, including 918 in research and development, 
154 in sales and marketing, 1,158 in manufacturing and customer support and 366 in general and administrative functions. We 
have 140 employees located in Europe and 2,456 located in the United States. We also use contractors on an as-needed basis.

Human Capital 

At Mercury, our people are at the center of everything we do in driving Innovation That Matters® by and for People Who 
Matter.  We  recognize  that  Mercury  will  succeed  only  if  our  employees  are  engaged,  given  an  opportunity  to  develop  and 
provided with a safe workplace that values diverse perspectives from a population that represents our communities. Our Board 
of  Directors  provides  oversight  of  our  people  practices,  including  regularly  reviewing  workforce  metrics  such  as  those 
described below. Additional data related to these metrics can be found on our website at www.mrcy.com under the Company – 
Environmental, Social and Governance tab (our “Website”).

14

• Employee  Overview:  As  of  June  30,  2023,  we  had  2,596  employees  around  the  globe.  Our  primary 
operations are in the U.S. with 2,456 employees and we operate offices in 11 states. Mercury also has operations in 
Europe and Canada. No employees are covered by any collective bargaining or similar agreements. 

• Culture and Employee Engagement: We believe our workplace culture drives engagement that turns ideas 
into action, delivering trusted and secure solutions at the speed of innovation. During the past fiscal year, four of our 
products were recognized among the most innovative solutions in aerospace and defense products and systems by the 
judges of the 2022 Military & Aerospace Electronics Innovators Awards program, marking the seventh consecutive 
year in which we have been recognized. Our investment in our employees extends to our workplaces. For fiscal 2023, 
we invested over $38.8 million to upgrade our locations to world-class facilities. We also encourage employees to give 
back to our communities. 

We  regularly  seek  employee  input  through  engagement  surveys,  the  results  of  which  drive  meaningful  and 
timely action, as appropriate, from our leadership team and people leaders across the Company. Participation in our 
most recent employee engagement survey in April 2023 remained strong at 76%.

• Training and Development: Life-long learning is encouraged at Mercury through our offering of LinkedIn 
Learning, tuition reimbursement and other employee development opportunities. We are deeply invested in building 
the  next  generation  of  engineers  and  scientists,  with  our  internship  and  co-op  programs.  We  offer  a  two-year 
engineering  rotational  program  to  recent  graduates  in  electrical,  firmware,  software,  RF  and  systems  engineering 
disciplines. During the program, employees gain insight and experience rotating through multiple business units and 
engineering disciplines and upon program completion are matched with a position. Mercury also has formal  programs 
to  further  develop  our  leaders,  at  various  levels:  Mentor  Programs,  Mercury  Managers  Matter  (for  manager-  and 
director-level employees); and Managing at Mercury (for supervisors, team leaders and new managers)

• Pay and Benefits: We seek competitiveness and fairness in total compensation with reference to external pay 
data and internal equity. We also offer a variety of well-being programs to support our employees and their families 
with healthy living. These programs include paid time off, paid parental leave, health insurance coverage, voluntary 
benefits (including pet insurance and caregiver support), company contributions to retirement savings and employee 
assistance and work-life programs. In addition, we offer employees less traditional benefits to support employee well-
being such as access to fitness and meditation apps, as well as an online platform through which employees participate 
in healthy living challenges and earn financial rewards.

• Environmental,  Health  and  Safety:  On  our  Website,  we  disclose  environmental  stewardship,  quality  and 
safety information, including OSHA injury data. We received a AAA MSCI ESG during 2021 and 2022, placing us in 
the top 3% of their ratings group for aerospace and defense.

• Diversity,  Equity  &  Inclusion:  Our  Website  discloses  detailed  workplace  data  surrounding  our  gender 
diversity,  racial/ethnic  diversity  and  turnover  data.  As  of  June  30,  2023,  women  and  racially/ethnically  diverse 
employees represented 29% and 43%, respectively, of Mercury’s workforce. Development of a diverse talent pipeline 
is a business imperative at Mercury and critical to our ability to drive innovation and improve long-term results. We 
have  established  relationships  with  job  networks  and  educational  institutions  to  proactively  attract  a  diverse  pool  of 
talent. Our employees are afforded opportunities to cultivate diversity, equity and inclusion both within Mercury and 
our  industry.  For  example,  Mercury  sponsors,  and  our  leaders  participate  in,  the  annual  Simmons  Leadership 
Conference  which  has  the  goal  of  preparing  the  next  generation  of  female  leaders  and  furthering  equality  in  the 
workplace.  Mercury  has  conducted  pay  equity  assessments  and  made  adjustments  to  pay  levels  for  employees  in 
protected classes, as appropriate, as a result of such assessments. 

Customers

RTX  Corporation  comprised  14%,  14%,  and  19%  of  our  revenues  in  each  of  the  fiscal  years  2023,  2022  and  2021, 
respectively. Lockheed Martin comprised 13%, 10%, and 15% of our revenues in each of the fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021, 
respectively. The United States Navy comprised less than 10%, 14% and 12% of our revenues in fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 
2021, respectively. Northrop Grumman accounted for 11% of our revenues in fiscal 2023 and less than 10% in fiscal years 2022 
and 2021, respectively. While sales to each of these customers comprise 10% or more of our annual revenue, the sales to these 
customers are spread across multiple programs and platforms. For the fiscal years ended 2023, 2022 and 2021, we had no single 
program that represented 10% or more of our revenues.

Corporate Headquarters and Incorporation

Our  corporate  headquarters  is  located  in  Andover,  Massachusetts.  Mercury  Systems,  Inc.  was  incorporated  in 

Massachusetts in 1981.

15

Financial Information about Geographic Scope

Information  about  revenue  we  receive  within  and  outside  the  U.S.  can  be  found  in  Note  Q  -  Operating  Segment, 
Geographic  Information  and  Significant  Customers  -  to  the  accompanying  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  included 
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

WEBSITE

We maintain a website at www.mrcy.com. We make available on our website, free of charge, our annual report on Form 
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, including exhibits and amendments to those reports 
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, as soon as reasonably 
practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 
Our code of business conduct and ethics is also available on our website. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or 
waivers from, our code of business conduct and ethics within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website 
posting or by filing a current report on Form 8-K with the SEC. Information contained on our website does not constitute part 
of this report. Our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Investors  and  others  should  note  that  we  announce  material  financial  information  using  our  website  (www.mrcy.com), 
SEC  filings,  press  releases,  public  conference  calls,  webcasts,  and  social  media,  including  Twitter  (twitter.com/mrcy  and 
twitter.com/mrcy_CEO) and LinkedIn (www.linkedin.com/company/mercury-systems). Therefore, we encourage investors and 
others interested in Mercury to review the information we post on the social media and other communication channels listed on 
our website.

ITEM 1A. 

RISK FACTORS:

Risks Related to Business Operations and Our Industry

We  depend  heavily  on  defense  electronics  programs  that  incorporate  our  products  and  services,  which  may  be  only 
partially funded and are subject to potential termination and reductions and delays in government spending.

Sales of our products and services, primarily as a subcontractor or team member with defense prime contractors, and in 
some  cases  directly,  to  the  U.S.  government  and  its  agencies,  as  well  as  foreign  governments  and  agencies,  accounted  for 
approximately 98%, 97% and 98% of our total net revenues in fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Our products 
and services are incorporated into many different domestic and international defense programs. Over the lifetime of a defense 
program,  the  award  of  many  different  individual  contracts  and  subcontracts  may  impact  our  products’  requirements.  The 
funding  of  U.S.  government  programs  is  subject  to  Congressional  appropriations.  Although  multiple-year  contracts  may  be 
planned  in  connection  with  major  procurements,  Congress  generally  appropriates  funds  on  a  fiscal  year  basis  even  though  a 
program may continue for many years. Consequently, programs are often only partially funded initially, and additional funds 
are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations and prime contracts receive such funding. The reduction or delay 
in  funding  or  termination  of  a  government  program  in  which  we  are  involved  could  result  in  a  loss  of  or  delay  in  receiving 
anticipated future revenues attributable to that program and contracts or orders received. The U.S. government could reduce or 
terminate a prime contract under which we are a subcontractor or team member irrespective of the quality of our products or 
services. The termination of a program or the reduction in or failure to commit additional funds to a program in which we are 
involved  could  negatively  impact  our  revenues  and  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  financial  condition  and  results  of 
operations.  The  U.S.  defense  budget  frequently  operates  under  a  continuing  budget  resolution,  which  increases  revenue 
uncertainty and volatility. For fiscal 2024 and beyond, the potential for gridlock in Congress, a continuing budget resolution, 
budget  sequestration,  a  U.S.  government  shutdown,  or  the  crowding  out  of  defense  funding  due  to  historically  high  budget 
deficits or changes in national spending priorities toward non-defense budget items could adversely impact our revenues and 
increase uncertainty in our business and financial planning. 

Economic conditions could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

World economic conditions and financial markets have, at times, experienced turmoil which could have material adverse 

impacts on our financial condition or our ability to achieve targeted results of operations due to:

•

•

•

•

•

reduced and delayed demand for our products;

increased risk of order cancellations or delays;

downward pressure on the prices of our products;

greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable; and

risks to our liquidity, including the possibility that we might not have access to our cash and short-term investments or 
to our line of credit when needed.

16

Further,  the  funding  of  the  defense  programs  that  incorporate  our  products  and  services  is  subject  to  the  overall 
U.S. government budget and appropriation decisions and processes, which are driven by numerous factors beyond our control, 
including geo-political, macroeconomic, public health and political conditions. We are unable to predict the likely duration and 
severity of adverse economic conditions in the United States and other countries, but the longer the duration or the greater the 
severity, the greater the risks we face in operating our business. The near-term potential for recessionary economic conditions 
and possible stagflation (persistent high inflation and stagnant economic demand) presents increased risks to our business. 

Price inflation for labor and materials, further exacerbated in energy and commodity markets by the Russian invasion 
of Ukraine, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We  have  experienced  considerable  price  inflation  in  our  costs  for  labor  and  materials  during  recent  years,  which 
adversely affected our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to pass through inflationary 
cost increases under our existing firm fixed price commercial item contracts and we may only be able to recoup a portion of our 
increased costs under our reimbursement-type contracts. Our ability to raise prices to reflect increased costs may be limited by 
competitive conditions in the market for our products and services. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and prolonged conflict there, 
may  continue  to  result  in  increased  inflation,  escalating  energy  and  commodity  prices  and  increasing  costs  of  materials.  We 
continue  to  work  to  mitigate  such  pressures  on  our  business  operations  as  they  develop.  To  the  extent  the  war  in  Ukraine 
continues to adversely affect our business as discussed above, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks 
described herein, such as those relating to cyber security, supply chain, volatility in prices and market conditions, any of which 
could negatively affect our business and financial condition.

The  loss  of  one  or  more  of  our  largest  customers,  programs,  or  applications  could  adversely  affect  our  results  of 
operations.

We are dependent on a small number of customers for a large portion of our revenues. A significant decrease in the sales 
to or loss of any of our major customers would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In fiscal 
2023, RTX Corporation accounted for 14% of our total net revenues, Lockheed Martin Corporation accounted for 13% of our 
total  net  revenues,  and  Northrop  Grumman  accounted  for  11%  of  our  total  net  revenues.  In  fiscal  2022,  RTX  Corporation 
accounted for 14% of our total net revenues, the U.S. Navy accounted for 14% of our total net revenues and Lockheed Martin 
Corporation accounted for 10% of our total net revenues. In fiscal 2021, RTX Corporation accounted for 19% of our total net 
revenues, Lockheed Martin Corporation accounted for 15% of our total net revenues and the U.S. Navy accounted for 12% of 
our  total  net  revenues.  Customers  in  the  defense  market  generally  purchase  our  products  in  connection  with  government 
programs that have a limited duration, leading to fluctuating sales to any particular customer in this market from year to year. In 
addition,  our  revenues  are  largely  dependent  upon  the  ability  of  customers  to  develop  and  sell  products  that  incorporate  our 
products. No assurance can be given that our customers will not experience financial, technical or other difficulties that could 
adversely  affect  their  operations  and,  in  turn,  our  results  of  operations.  Additionally,  on  a  limited  number  of  programs  the 
customer has co-manufacturing rights which could lead to a shift of production on such a program away from us which in turn 
could lead to lower revenues.

Going forward, we believe the F-35, Filthy Buzzard & Badger,  F/A-18, LTAMDS, THAAD and Aegis programs could 
be a large portion of our future revenues in the coming years, and the loss or cancellation of these programs could adversely 
affect our future results. Further, new programs may yield lower margins than legacy programs, which could result in an overall 
reduction in gross margins.

If we are unable to respond adequately to our competition or to changing technology, we may lose existing customers 
and fail to win future business opportunities. The emergence of commodity-type products as acceptable substitutes for 
certain of our products may cause customers to delay purchases or seek alternative solutions. 

The  markets  for  our  products  are  highly  competitive  and  are  characterized  by  rapidly  changing  technology,  frequent 
product performance improvements, and evolving industry standards. Competitors may be able to offer more attractive pricing, 
develop  products  with  performance  features  that  are  superior  to  our  products,  or  offer  higher  quality  or  superior  on  time 
delivery, resulting in reduced demand for our products. Recently, our on-time delivery has suffered due in part to supply chain 
volatility and unanticipated supplier decommits. We may be unable to keep pace with competitors’ marketing and the lack of 
visibility in the marketplace may negatively impact design wins, bookings, and revenues. Customers may also decide to reduce 
costs  and  accept  the  least  costly  technically  acceptable  alternative  to  our  products  or  services.  In  addition,  customers  may 
decide  to  insource  products  that  they  have  outsourced  to  us.  Due  to  the  rapidly  changing  nature  of  technology,  we  may  not 
become aware in advance of the emergence of new competitors into our markets. The emergence of new competitors in our 
markets could result in the loss of existing customers or programs and may have a negative impact on our ability to win future 
business.  Perceptions  of  Mercury  as  a  high-cost  provider  or  for  late  deliveries  could  cause  us  to  lose  existing  customers  or 
programs or fail to win new business. Further, our lack of strong engagements with important government-funded laboratories 
(e.g.  DARPA,  MIT  Lincoln  Labs,  MITRE)  may  inhibit  our  ability  to  become  subsystem  solution  design  partners  with  our 
defense prime customers.

17

Our  products  are  often  designed  for  operating  under  physical  constraints  such  as  limited  space,  weight,  and  electrical 
power. Furthermore, these products are often designed to be “rugged,” that is, to withstand enhanced environmental stress such 
as extended temperature range, shock, vibration, and exposure to sand or salt spray. Historically these requirements have often 
precluded  the  use  of  less  expensive,  readily  available  commodity-type  systems  typically  found  in  more  benign  non-military 
settings.  With  continued  microprocessor  evolution,  low-end  systems  could  become  adequate  to  meet  the  requirements  of  an 
increased number of the lesser-demanding applications within our target markets. Commercial server manufacturers and other 
low-end single-board computer, or new competitors, may attempt to penetrate the high-performance market for aerospace and 
defense  electronics  systems.  Factors  that  may  increase  the  acceptability  of  commodity-type  products  in  some  aerospace  and 
defense platforms include improvements in the physical properties and durability of such alternative products, combined with 
the relaxation of physical and ruggedness requirements by the military due to either a reevaluation of those requirements or the 
installation  of  products  in  a  more  highly  environmentally  isolated  setting.  These  developments  could  negatively  impact  our 
revenues and have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Competition from existing or new companies could cause us to experience downward pressure on prices, fewer customer 
orders, reduced margins, the inability to take advantage of new business opportunities and the loss of market share.

We  compete  in  highly  competitive  industries,  and  our  customers  generally  extend  the  competitive  pressures  they  face 
throughout their respective supply chains. Additionally, our markets are facing increasing industry consolidation, resulting in 
larger competitors who have more market share putting more downward pressure on prices and offering a more robust portfolio 
of  products  and  services.  We  are  subject  to  competition  based  upon  product  design,  performance,  pricing,  quality,  on  time 
delivery,  and  support  services.  Our  product  performance,  engineering  expertise,  and  product  quality  have  been  important 
factors in our growth. While we try to maintain competitive pricing on those products that are directly comparable to products 
manufactured by others, in many instances our products will conform to more exacting specifications and carry a higher price 
than  analogous  products.  Many  of  our  customers  and  potential  customers  have  the  capacity  to  design  and  internally 
manufacture products that are similar to our products. We face competition from research and product development groups and 
the  manufacturing  operations  of  current  and  potential  customers,  who  continually  evaluate  the  benefits  of  internal  research, 
product development, and manufacturing versus outsourcing. Our defense prime contractor customers could decide to pursue 
one or more of our product development areas as a core competency and insource that technology development and production 
rather than purchase that capability from us as a supplier. This competition could result in fewer customer orders and a loss of 
market share.

We  may  be  unable  to  obtain  critical  components  from  suppliers,  which  could  disrupt  or  delay  our  ability  to  deliver 
products to our customers.

Several  components  used  in  our  products  are  currently  obtained  from  sole-source  suppliers.  We  are  dependent  on  key 
vendors  such  as  Xilinx,  Inc.,  Intel  Corporation  and  Microsemi  for  Field  Programmable  Gate  Arrays  (“FPGA”),  on  NXP 
Semiconductor  for  Application-Specific  Integrated  Circuits  (“ASICs”),  Intel  Corporation  and  NXP  Semiconductor  for 
processors, Micron Technology, Inc. for specific memory products and in general any sole-source microelectronics suppliers. 
Generally,  suppliers  may  terminate  their  contracts  with  us  without  cause  upon  30  days’  notice  and  may  cease  offering  their 
products upon 180 days’ notice. If any of our sole-source suppliers limits or reduces the sale of these components, we may be 
unable to fulfill customer orders in a timely manner or at all. These sole-source and other suppliers are each subject to quality 
and performance issues, materials shortages, excess demand, reduction in capacity, and other factors that may disrupt the flow 
of  goods  to  us  or  to  our  customers,  which  would  adversely  affect  our  business  and  customer  relationships.  There  can  be  no 
assurance that these suppliers will continue to meet our requirements. If supply arrangements are interrupted, we may not be 
able  to  find  another  supplier  on  a  timely  or  satisfactory  basis.  We  may  incur  significant  set-up  costs  and  delays  in 
manufacturing  should  it  become  necessary  to  replace  any  key  vendors  due  to  work  stoppages,  shipping  delays,  financial 
difficulties, natural or manmade disasters or other factors. In addition, our industry, along with many others, is continuing to 
face a shortage of semiconductors as well as extended lead times. We have experienced and are experiencing meaningful levels 
of  semiconductor  impact.  The  continuing  shortage  of  semiconductors  and  other  key  components  can  cause  a  significant 
disruption to our production schedule. Unprecedented material lead times and supplier decommits have increased volatility in 
our operating and financial results, including lower revenue and higher inventory and unbilled receivables, as well as decreased 
cash flow. Carrying increased levels of inventory also increases our potential risk of future inventory obsolescence. 

18

We may not be able to effectively manage our relationships with contract manufacturers.

We may not be able to effectively manage our relationship with contract manufacturers, and the contract manufacturers 
may not meet future requirements for timely delivery. We rely on contract manufacturers to build hardware sub-assemblies for 
certain of our products in accordance with our specifications. During the normal course of business, we may provide demand 
forecasts to contract manufacturers several months prior to scheduled delivery of our products to customers. If we overestimate 
requirements, the contract manufacturers may assess cancellation penalties or we may be left with excess inventory, which may 
negatively impact our earnings. If we underestimate requirements, the contract manufacturers may have inadequate inventory, 
which  could  interrupt  manufacturing  of  our  products  and  result  in  delays  in  shipment  to  customers  and  revenue  recognition. 
Contract  manufacturers  also  build  products  for  other  companies,  and  they  may  not  have  sufficient  quantities  of  inventory 
available or sufficient internal resources to fill our orders on a timely basis or at all.

We  currently  rely  primarily  on  two  contract  manufacturers,  Benchmark  Electronics,  Inc.  and  Omega  Electronics 
Manufacturing Services. The failure of these contract manufacturers to fill our orders on a timely basis or in accordance with 
our customers’ specifications could result in a loss of revenues and damage to our reputation. 

We are exposed to risks associated with international operations and markets.

We  market  and  sell  products  in  international  markets  and  have  sales  offices  and  manufacturing  and/or  engineering 
facilities  and  subsidiaries  in  Switzerland,  Spain,  the  United  Kingdom  and  Canada.  Revenues  from  international  operations 
accounted for 5%, 4% and 5%, of our total net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We also ship directly from 
our U.S. operations to international customers. There are inherent risks in transacting business internationally, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements;

export and import restrictions, including export controls relating to technology and sanctioned parties;

tariffs and other trade barriers;

less favorable intellectual property laws;

difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

longer payment cycles;

problems in collecting accounts receivable;

adverse economic conditions in foreign markets;

political instability;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which may lead to lower operating margins, or may cause us to raise prices 
which could result in reduced revenues;

expatriation controls; and

potential adverse tax consequences.

There  can  be  no  assurance  that  one  or  more  of  these  factors  will  not  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  future 

international activities and, consequently, on our business and results of operations.

We  have  a  pension  plan  (the  “Plan”)  for  Swiss  employees,  mandated  by  Swiss  law.  Since  participants  of  the  Plan  are 
entitled  to  a  defined  rate  of  interest  on  contributions  made,  the  Plan  meets  the  criteria  for  a  defined  benefit  plan  under  U.S. 
GAAP.  The  Plan,  an  independent  pension  fund,  is  part  of  a  multi-employer  plan  with  unrestricted  joint  liability  for  all 
participating companies and the economic interest in the Plan’s overfunding or underfunding is allocated to each participating 
company based on an allocation key determined by the Plan. U.S. GAAP requires an employer to recognize the funded status of 
the  defined  benefit  plan  on  the  balance  sheet,  which  we  have  presented  in  other  long-term  liabilities  on  our  Consolidated 
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2023. The funded status may vary from year to year due to changes in the fair value of the Plan’s 
assets and variations on the underlying assumptions in the Plan and we may have to record an increased liability as a result of 
fluctuations  in  the  value  of  the  Plan’s  assets.  As  of  June  30,  2023,  we  had  a  liability  of  $4.2  million  in  Other  non-current 
liabilities representing the net under-funded status of the Plan.

In addition, we must comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and the anti-corruption laws of the 
countries in which we operate. Those laws generally prohibit the giving of anything of value to win business. The FCPA also 
generally  requires  companies  to  maintain  adequate  record-keeping  and  internal  accounting  practices  to  accurately  reflect  the 
transactions of the company and prohibits U.S. companies and their intermediaries from making corrupt payments to foreign 
officials  for  the  purpose  of  obtaining  or  keeping  business  or  otherwise  obtaining  favorable  treatment.  Under  these  anti-
corruption laws, U.S. companies may be held liable for actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. If we or 
our  intermediaries  fail  to  comply  with  the  requirements  of  international  applicable  anti-corruption  laws,  governmental 

19

authorities in the United States or the countries in which we operate could seek to impose civil and criminal penalties, or restrict 
or limit our ability to do business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial 
condition, and cash flows.

If we are unable to respond to technological developments and changing customer needs on a timely and cost-effective 
basis, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our future success will depend in part on our ability to enhance current products and to develop new products on a timely 
and  cost-effective  basis  to  respond  to  technological  developments  and  changing  customer  needs.  Defense  customers  demand 
frequent  technological  improvements  as  a  means  of  gaining  military  advantage.  Military  planners  have  historically  funded 
significantly  more  design  projects  than  actual  deployments  of  new  equipment,  and  those  systems  that  are  deployed  tend  to 
contain the components of the subcontractors selected to participate in the design process. To participate in the design of new 
defense  electronics  systems,  we  must  demonstrate  the  ability  to  deliver  superior  technological  performance  on  a  timely  and 
cost-effective basis. There can be no assurance that we will secure an adequate number of design wins in the future, that the 
equipment in which our products are intended to function will eventually be deployed in the field, or that our products will be 
included in such equipment if it eventually is deployed.

The design-in process is typically lengthy and expensive, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue 
to  meet  the  product  specifications  of  customers  in  a  timely  and  adequate  manner.  In  addition,  any  failure  to  anticipate  or 
respond  adequately  to  changes  in  technology,  customer  preferences  and  future  order  demands,  or  any  significant  delay  in 
product developments, product introductions, or order volume, could negatively impact our financial condition and results of 
operations,  including  the  risk  of  inventory  obsolescence.  Because  of  the  complexity  of  our  products,  we  have  experienced 
delays from time to time in completing products on a timely basis. 

Our need for continued or increased investment in R&D may increase expenses and reduce our profitability.

Our business is characterized by the need for continued investment in R&D. If we fail to invest sufficiently in R&D, our 
products could become less attractive to potential customers and our business and financial condition could be materially and 
adversely affected. As a result of the need to maintain spending levels in this area and the difficulty in reducing costs associated 
with R&D, our operating results could be materially harmed if our R&D efforts fail to result in new products or if revenues fall 
below  expectations.  As  a  result  of  our  commitment  to  invest  in  R&D,  spending  levels  of  R&D  expenses  as  a  percentage  of 
revenues may fluctuate in the future. In addition, defense prime contractors could increase their requirement for subcontractors, 
like us, to increase their share in the R&D costs for new programs and design wins.

Our  results  of  operations  are  subject  to  fluctuation  from  period  to  period  and  may  not  be  an  accurate  indication  of 
future performance.

While our revenues are generated through the sale of products and services across more than 300 programs with no single 
program contributing more than 10% of our annual revenues, we have experienced fluctuations in operating results due to shifts 
in timing or quantities across certain of our larger programs. Customers specify delivery date requirements that coincide with 
their  need  for  our  products  and  services  on  the  programs  in  which  we  participate.  Because  these  customers  may  use  our 
products and services in connection with a variety of defense programs or other projects with different sizes and durations, a 
customer’s orders for one quarter generally do not indicate a trend for future orders by that customer or on that program. As 
such, we cannot always accurately plan our manufacturing, inventory and working capital requirements. As a result, if orders 
and shipments differ from what we predict, we may incur additional expenses and build excess inventory, which may require 
additional  reserves  and  allowances  and  reduce  our  working  capital  and  operational  flexibility.  Any  significant  change  in  our 
customers’ purchasing patterns could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and reported earnings per share for 
a particular quarter. Results of operations in any period should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for any 
future period.

High  quarterly  book-ship  ratios  pressure  our  inventory  and  cash  flow  management,  necessitating  increased  inventory 
balances to ensure quarterly revenue attainment. Increased inventory balances tie up additional capital, limiting our operational 
flexibility.  Some  of  our  customers  may  have  become  conditioned  to  wait  until  the  end  of  a  quarter  to  place  orders  in  the 
expectation of receiving a discount. Customers conditioned to seek quarter-end discounts increase risk and uncertainty in our 
financial forecasting and decrease our margins and profitability.

Our quarterly results may be subject to fluctuations resulting from other factors, including:

•

•

•

•

delays in completion of internal product development projects;

delays in shipping hardware and software or licensing design intellectual property;

delays in acceptance testing by customers;

a change in the mix of products sold;

20

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

changes in customer or program order patterns;

production delays due to quality problems;

failure to achieve or maintain quality certifications, such as AS9100;

inability to scale quick reaction capability products due to low product volume;

shortages and increased costs of components;

delays due to the implementation of new tariffs or other trade barriers;

the timing of product line transitions;

declines in quarterly revenues from previous generations of products following announcement of replacement 
products containing more advanced technology; and

changes in estimates of completion on fixed price engagements, which represent a substantial and increasing 
percentage of our business.

In addition, from time to time, we have entered into contracts, referred to as development contracts, to engineer a specific 
solution based on modifications to standard products. Gross margins from development contract revenues are typically lower 
than gross margins from standard product revenues. We intend to continue to enter into development contracts and anticipate 
that  the  gross  margins  associated  with  development  contract  revenues  will  continue  to  be  lower  than  gross  margins  from 
standard product sales.

Many  of  our  contracts  require  that  our  facilities  remain  certified  at  the  AS91000  or  ISO9001  level  in  order  to  ship 
products from the relevant facility. Failure to obtain or maintain the required certification may require a waiver by the customer 
for  shipments  to  continue  until  the  certification  is  obtained.  There  can  be  no  assurance  that  we  will  receive  any  customer 
waivers if a required certification is lost or delayed. 

Another  factor  contributing  to  fluctuations  in  our  quarterly  results  is  the  fixed  nature  of  expenditures  on  personnel, 
facilities, information technology and marketing programs. Expense levels for these programs are based, in significant part, on 
expectations  of  future  revenues.  If  actual  quarterly  revenues  are  below  management’s  expectations,  our  results  of  operations 
could be adversely affected.

Further, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United 
States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of 
contingent  assets  and  liabilities  at  the  dates  of  the  financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses 
during the reporting periods. The percentage of our total revenue using over time revenue accounting has increased in recent 
years  due  to  M&A  transactions  and  the  movement  in  our  business  toward  subsystem  development.  Over  time  revenue 
recognition  is  more  reliant  on  estimates  than  the  accounting  for  our  component  sales.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  those 
estimates, and changes in estimates in subsequent periods could cause our results of operations to fluctuate.

We rely on the significant experience and specialized expertise of our senior management, engineering and operational 
staff and must retain and attract qualified and highly skilled personnel to grow our business successfully.

Our performance is substantially dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and our 
highly  qualified  team  of  engineers  and  operational  staff,  many  of  whom  have  numerous  years  of  experience,  specialized 
expertise  in  our  industry  and  security  clearances  required  for  certain  defense  projects.  If  we  are  not  successful  in  hiring  and 
retaining such employees, we may not be able to extend or maintain our engineering and operational expertise and our future 
product  development  efforts  could  be  adversely  affected.  Competition  for  hiring  these  employees  is  intense,  especially 
individuals with specialized skills and security clearances required for our business, and we may be unable to hire and retain 
enough staff to implement our growth strategy or to perform on our existing commitments. Like our defense prime contractor 
customers, we face the potential for knowledge drain due to the continuing retirement of the older members of our engineering 
and operations workforce in the coming years.

To  the  extent  that  we  lose  experienced  personnel,  it  is  critical  that  we  develop  other  employees,  hire  new  qualified 
personnel  and  successfully  manage  the  short  and  long-term  transfer  of  critical  knowledge  and  skills.  We  compete  with 
commercial technology companies outside of the aerospace and defense industry for qualified technical positions as the number 
of qualified domestic engineers is decreasing and the number of available professionals is not keeping up with demand. To the 
extent that these companies grow at a faster rate or face fewer cost and product pricing constraints, they may be able to offer 
more attractive compensation and other benefits to candidates, including in the recruitment of our existing employees. In cases 
where the demand for skilled personnel exceeds supply, we could experience higher labor, recruiting or training costs to attract 
and  retain  such  employees.  We  also  must  manage  leadership  development  and  succession  planning  throughout  our  business. 
While we have processes in place for management transition and the transfer of knowledge and skills, the loss of key personnel, 

21

coupled  with  an  inability  to  adequately  train  other  personnel,  hire  new  personnel,  or  transfer  knowledge  and  skills,  could 
significantly impact our ability to perform under our contracts and execute on new or growing programs.

Beginning with the pandemic, a significant portion of our workforce began working remotely and we expect a significant 
portion will continue to work a hybrid schedule even as we transition more employees back to onsite work over time. We see 
many benefits to remote and hybrid work and have adopted new tools and processes to support the workforce. However, if we 
are unable to effectively adapt to this hybrid work environment long term, then we may experience a less cohesive workforce, 
increased  attrition,  reduced  program  performance  and  less  innovation.  In  recent  years,  we  have  experienced  unusually  high 
employee attrition and our costs to retain employees increased.

Our challenges in retaining key employees may be impacted by the termination of the Company’s announced strategic 
review initiative in June 2023 and any unanticipated challenges with the transition of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer 
and  Chief  Financial  Officer  roles,  as  we  have  recently  appointed  a  new  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  our  new 
Chief  Financial  Officer  joined  us  in  mid  July  2023.  The  decline  in  our  stock  price  during  2023  may  also  increase  employee 
retention risks.

If  we  experience  a  disaster  or  other  business  continuity  problem,  we  may  not  be  able  to  recover  successfully,  which 
could cause material financial loss, loss of human capital, regulatory actions, reputational harm, or legal liability.

If we experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, such as an earthquake, terrorist attack, 
pandemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend, in part, on the availability of our personnel, 
our facilities and the proper functioning of our network, telecommunication and other business systems and operations. As we 
grow our operations, the potential for natural or man-made disasters, political, economic, or infrastructure instabilities, or other 
country- or region-specific business continuity risks increases.

We face various risks related to health pandemics such as COVID. 

We face secondary and tertiary effects related to the pandemic, including disruptions in our supply chain, particularly for 
long lead time semiconductors. We continue to monitor the situation, assessing possible implications on our operations, supply 
chain, liquidity and cash flow and will continue taking actions to mitigate adverse consequences. 

Risks Related to M&A and Acquisition Integration

Implementation of our growth strategy may not be successful, which could affect our ability to increase revenues and 
profits.

Our growth strategy includes developing new products, adding new customers and programs within our existing markets, 
and  entering  new  markets  both  domestically  and  internationally,  developing  our  manufacturing  capabilities,  as  well  as 
identifying  and  integrating  acquisitions  and  achieving  revenue  and  cost  synergies  and  economies  of  scale.  Our  ability  to 
compete in new markets will depend upon several factors including, among others:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

our ability to create demand for products in new markets;

our ability to respond to changes in our customers’ businesses by updating existing products and introducing, in a 
timely fashion, new products which meet the needs of our customers;

our ability to increase our market visibility and penetration with prime defense contractors, government agencies and 
government funded laboratories;

the quality of our new products;

our ability to respond rapidly to technological changes; 

our ability to increase our in-house manufacturing capacity and utilization as well as our ability to deliver on schedule 
and on budget; and

our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions and achieve revenue and cost synergies and economies of scale.

The  failure  to  do  any  of  the  foregoing  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial  condition,  and 
results  of  operations.  In  addition,  we  may  face  competition  in  these  new  markets  from  various  companies  that  may  have 
substantially greater research and development resources, marketing and financial resources, manufacturing capability and/or 
customer support organizations.

Acquisitions may adversely affect our financial condition.

As  part  of  our  strategy  for  growth,  we  may  explore  acquisitions  or  strategic  alliances,  which  ultimately  may  not  be 
completed or be beneficial to us. While we expect any acquisitions to result in synergies and other financial and operational 

22

benefits, we may be unable to realize these synergies or other benefits in the timeframe that we expect or at all. The integration 
process may be complex, costly and time consuming. Acquisitions may pose risks to our business, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

problems and increased costs in connection with the integration of the personnel, operations, technologies, or 
products of the acquired businesses;

layering of integration activity due to multiple overlapping acquisitions;

unanticipated issues, expenses, charges, or liabilities related to the acquisitions;

failure to implement our business plan for the combined business or to achieve anticipated increases in revenues and 
profitability;

diversion of management’s attention from our organic business;

adverse effects on business relationships with suppliers and customers, including the failure to retain key customers;

acquired assets becoming impaired as a result of technical advancements or worse-than-expected performance by the 
acquired company;

failure to rationalize supply chain, manufacturing capacity, locations, logistics and operating models to achieve 
anticipated economies of scale, or disruptions to supply chain, manufacturing, or product design operations during 
the combination of facilities;

failure to rationalize business, information and communication systems and to expand the IT infrastructure and 
security protocols throughout the enterprise;

volatility associated with accounting for earn-outs in a given transaction;

entering markets in which we have no, or limited, prior experience;

environmental liabilities at current or previous sites of the acquired business;

poor compliance programs pre-acquisition at acquired companies, which may lead to liabilities for violations, or 
impact the business acquired when placed under our compliance programs;

unanticipated changes in applicable laws or regulations;

potential loss of key employees; 

the impact of any assumed legal proceedings; and 

adverse effects on our internal control over financial reporting before the acquiree's complete integration into our 
control environment.

In addition, in connection with any acquisitions or investments we could:

•

•

•

•

•

•

issue stock that would dilute our existing shareholders;

incur debt and assume liabilities;

obtain financing on unfavorable terms, or not be able to obtain financing on any terms at all;

incur amortization expenses related to acquired intangible assets or incur large and immediate write-offs;

incur large expenditures related to office closures of the acquired companies, including costs relating to the 
termination of employees and facility and leasehold improvement charges resulting from our having to vacate the 
acquired companies’ premises; and

reduce the cash that would otherwise be available to fund operations or for other purposes.

We may not be able to maintain the levels of revenue, earnings, or operating efficiency that we and our prior acquisitions 
had achieved or might achieve separately. You should not place undue reliance on any anticipated synergies. In addition, our 
competitors could try to emulate our strategy, leading to greater competition for acquisition targets which could lead to larger 
competitors if they succeed in emulating our strategy.

23

We may incur substantial indebtedness.

On  February  28,  2022,  we  amended  our  existing  revolving  credit  facility  (“the  Revolver”)  to  increase  and  extend  the 
borrowing capacity to a $1.1 billion, 5-year revolving credit line, with the maturity extended to February 28, 2027. As of June 
30, 2023, we had $511.5 million of outstanding borrowings on the Revolver. The Revolver accrues interest, at our option, at 
floating  rates  tied  to  Secured  Overnight  Financing  Rate  ("SOFR")  or  the  prime  rate  plus  an  applicable  percentage.  The 
applicable percentage is set at SOFR plus 1.25% and is established pursuant to a pricing grid based on our total net leverage 
ratio. We may be exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. Subject to the limits 
contained  in  the  Revolver,  we  may  incur  substantial  additional  debt  from  time  to  time  to  finance  working  capital,  capital 
expenditures,  investments  or  acquisitions,  or  for  other  purposes.  If  we  do  so,  the  risks  related  to  our  debt  could  intensify. 
Specifically, our debt could have important consequences to our investors, including the following: 

• making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our debt instruments, including, without limitation, the 

Revolver; and if we fail to comply with these requirements, an event of default could result; 

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or 
other general corporate requirements; 

requiring a substantial portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, 
thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other 
general corporate purposes; 

increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; 

exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of our borrowings may have variable interest rates, which 
could increase the cost of servicing our financial instruments and could materially reduce our profitability and cash 
flows; 

limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete; 

placing us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and 

increasing our cost of borrowing.

In addition, the Revolver contains restrictive covenants that may limit our ability to engage in activities that are in our 
long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or 
waived,  could  result  in  the  acceleration  of  all  our  debt.  And,  if  we  were  unable  to  repay  the  amounts  due  and  payable,  the 
lenders under the Revolver could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. 

Increases in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our financial instruments with exposure to interest rate risk 
and  could  materially  reduce  our  profitability  and  cash  flows.  Assuming  that  we  had  $100.0  million  of  floating  rate  debt 
outstanding,  our  annual  interest  expense  would  change  by  approximately  $1.0  million  for  each  100  basis  point  increase  in 
interest rates. We may also incur costs related to interest rate hedges, including the termination of any such hedges. As of June 
30, 2023, we had a swap agreement in effect that fixed $300.0 million of the total $511.5 million of outstanding borrowings 
under the Revolver at a rate of 3.79%. The movement of interest rates would affect the value of such swap agreement. 

Our recent negative free cash flow, if not improved, could eventually lead to challenges in servicing our debt.

We have a significant amount of goodwill and intangible assets on our consolidated financial statements that are subject 
to impairment based upon future adverse changes in our business or prospects.

At  June  30,  2023,  the  carrying  values  of  goodwill  and  identifiable  intangible  assets  on  our  balance  sheet  were 
$938.1  million  and  $298.1  million,  respectively.  We  evaluate  indefinite  lived  intangible  assets  and  goodwill  for  impairment 
annually  in  the  fourth  quarter,  or  more  frequently  if  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  asset  might  be 
impaired. Indefinite lived intangible assets are impaired and goodwill impairment is indicated when their book value exceeds 
fair value. We also review finite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets when indications of potential impairment exist, 
such as a significant reduction in undiscounted cash flows associated with the assets. Should the fair value of our long-lived 
assets  decline  because  of  reduced  operating  performance,  market  declines,  or  other  indicators  of  impairment,  a  charge  to 
operations for impairment may be necessary. The value of goodwill and intangible assets from the allocation of purchase price 
from  our  acquisitions  will  be  derived  from  our  business  operating  plans  and  is  susceptible  to  an  adverse  change  in  demand, 
input costs or general changes in our business or industry and could require an impairment charge in the future.

Risks Related to Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Matters

We face risks and uncertainties associated with defense-related contracts

Whether our contracts are directly with the U.S. government, a foreign government, or one of their respective agencies, or 

indirectly as a subcontractor or team member, our contracts and subcontracts are subject to special risks. For example:

24

•

•

•

•

Our contracts with the U.S. and foreign governments and their defense prime contractors and subcontractors are 
subject to termination either upon default by us or at the convenience of the government or contractor if, among other 
reasons, the program itself has been terminated. Termination for convenience provisions generally only entitle us to 
recover costs incurred, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to termination.
Because we contract to supply goods and services to the U.S. and foreign governments and their prime and 
subcontractors, we compete for contracts in a competitive bidding process. We may not be awarded the contract if the 
pricing or product offering is not competitive, either at our level or the prime or subcontractor level. In the event we 
are awarded a contract, we are subject to protests by losing bidders of contract awards that can result in the reopening 
of the bidding process and changes in governmental policies or regulations and other political factors. We may be 
subject to multiple rebid requirements over the life of a defense program to continue to participate in such program, 
which can result in the loss of the program or significantly reduce our revenue or margin. Requirements for more 
frequent technology refreshes on defense programs may lead to increased costs and lower long-term revenues.
Consolidation among defense industry contractors has resulted in a few large contractors with increased bargaining 
power relative to us. 
Our customers include U.S. government contractors who must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations 
relating to the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts. When we contract with the 
U.S. government, we must comply with these laws and regulations. A violation of these laws and regulations could 
result in the imposition of fines and penalties to us or our customers or the termination of our or their contracts with 
the U.S. government. As a result, there could be a delay in our receipt of orders from our customers, a termination of 
such orders, or a termination of contracts between us and the U.S. government.

• We sell certain products and services to U.S. and international defense contractors or directly to the U.S. government 
on a commercial item basis, eliminating the requirement to disclose and certify cost data. To the extent that there are 
interpretations or changes in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”) regarding the qualifications necessary to 
sell commercial items, there could be a material impact on our business and operating results. For example, there have 
been legislative proposals to narrow the definition of a “commercial item” (as defined in the FAR) or to require cost 
and pricing data on commercial items that could limit or adversely impact our ability to contract under commercial 
item terms. Changes could be accelerated due to changes in our mix of business, in federal regulations, or in the 
interpretation of federal regulations, which may subject us to increased oversight by the Defense Contract Audit 
Agency (“DCAA”) for certain of our products or services. Such changes could also trigger contract coverage for a 
larger percentage of our contracts under the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”), further impacting our commercial 
operating model and requiring compliance with a defined set of business systems criteria. Failure to comply with 
applicable CAS requirements could adversely impact our ability to win future CAS-type contracts.

• We are subject to the Department of Defense Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (“CMMC”) in connection 
with our defense work for the U.S. government and defense prime contractors. Inability to meet the qualifications to 
the CMMC and any amendments may increase our costs or delay the award of contracts if we are unable to certify that 
we satisfy such cybersecurity requirements at our Company level and into our supply chain.
The U.S. government or a defense prime contractor customer could require us to relinquish data rights to a product in 
connection  with  performing  work  on  a  defense  contract,  which  could  lead  to  a  loss  of  valuable  technology  and 
intellectual property in order to participate in a government program.
The U.S. government or a defense prime contractor customer could require us to enter into cost reimbursable contracts 
that could offset our cost efficiency initiatives.

•

•

• We  anticipate  that  sales  to  our  U.S.  prime  defense  contractor  customers  as  part  of  foreign  military  sales  (“FMS”) 
programs will be an increasing part of our business going forward. These FMS sales combine several different types of 
risks  and  uncertainties  highlighted  above,  including  risks  related  to  government  contracts,  risks  related  to  defense 
contracts, timing and budgeting of foreign governments and approval from the U.S. and foreign governments related to 
the programs, all of which may be impacted by macroeconomic and geopolitical factors outside of our control. 

• We must comply with security requirements pursuant to 32 CFR Part 117, formerly known as the National Industrial 
Security  Program  Operating  Manual,  or  NISPOM,  and  other  U.S.  government  security  protocols  when  accessing 
sensitive information. Many of our facilities maintain a facility security clearance and many of our employees maintain 
a personal security clearance to access sensitive information necessary to the performance of our work on certain U.S. 
government contracts and subcontracts. Failure to comply with such security requirements may subject us to civil or 
criminal  penalties,  loss  of  access  to  sensitive  information,  loss  of  a  U.S.  government  contract  or  subcontract,  or 
potentially debarment as a government contractor. 

• We may need to invest additional capital to build out higher level security infrastructure at certain of our facilities to 
capture  new  design  wins  on  defense  programs  with  higher  level  security  requirements.  In  addition,  we  may  need  to 
invest  in  additional  secure  laboratory  space  to  integrate  efficiently  subsystem  level  solutions  and  maintain  quality 
assurance on current and future programs.

25

If we are unable to continue to obtain U.S. government authorization regarding the export of our products, or if current 
or  future  export  laws  limit  or  otherwise  restrict  our  business,  we  could  be  prohibited  from  shipping  our  products  to 
certain countries, which would harm our ability to generate revenue.

We  must  comply  with  U.S.  laws  regulating  the  export  of  our  products  and  technology.  In  addition,  we  are  required  to 
obtain a license from the U.S. government to export certain of our products and technical data as well as to provide technical 
services to foreign persons related to such products and technical data. We cannot be sure of our ability to obtain any licenses 
required to export our products or to receive authorization from the U.S. government for international sales or domestic sales to 
foreign  persons  including  transfers  of  technical  data  or  the  provision  of  technical  services.  Likewise,  our  international 
operations are subject to the export laws of the countries in which they conduct business. Moreover, the export regimes and the 
governing policies applicable to our business are subject to change. If we cannot obtain required government approvals under 
applicable  regulations  in  a  timely  manner  or  at  all,  we  could  be  delayed  or  prevented  from  selling  our  products  in  certain 
jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial results. 

Our income tax provision and other tax liabilities may be insufficient if taxing authorities are successful in asserting tax 
positions that are contrary to our position. Increases in tax rates could impact our financial performance.

From time to time, we are audited by various federal, state, local and foreign authorities regarding income tax matters. 
Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes and our liabilities for other taxes. Although we 
believe our approach to determining the appropriate tax treatment is supportable and in accordance with relevant authoritative 
guidance it is possible that the final tax authority will take a tax position that is materially different than that which is reflected 
in  our  income  tax  provision.  Such  differences  could  have  an  adverse  effect  on  our  income  tax  provision  or  benefit,  in  the 
reporting period in which such determination is made and, consequently, on our results of operations, financial position and/or 
cash flows for such period. Further, future increases in tax rates may adversely affect our financial results.

Our products are complex, and undetected defects may increase our costs, harm our reputation with customers or lead 
to costly litigation.

Our  products  are  extremely  complex  and  must  operate  successfully  with  complex  products  of  our  customers  and  their 
other  vendors.  Our  products  may  contain  undetected  errors  when  first  introduced  or  as  we  introduce  product  upgrades.  The 
pressures we face to be the first to market new products or functionality and the elapsed time before our products are integrated 
into our customer's systems increases the possibility that we will offer products in which we or our customers later discover 
problems. We have experienced new product and product upgrade errors in the past and expect similar problems in the future. 
These  problems  may  cause  us  to  incur  significant  warranty  costs  and  costs  to  support  our  service  contracts  and  divert  the 
attention  of  personnel  from  our  product  development  efforts.  Also,  hostile  third  parties  or  nation  states  may  try  to  install 
malicious code or devices into our products or software. Undetected errors may adversely affect our product’s ease of use and 
may create customer satisfaction issues. If we are unable to repair these problems in a timely manner, we may experience a loss 
of or delay in revenue and significant damage to our reputation and business prospects. Many of our customers rely upon our 
products  for  mission-critical  applications.  Because  of  this  reliance,  errors,  defects,  or  other  performance  problems  in  our 
products could result in significant financial and other damage to our customers. Our customers could attempt to recover those 
losses by pursuing products liability claims against us which, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly 
to defend and could adversely affect our reputation.

Risks Related to Information Technology and Intellectual Property

We may need to invest in new information technology systems and infrastructure to scale our operations.

We  may  need  to  adopt  new  information  technology  systems  and  infrastructure  to  scale  our  business  and  obtain  the 
synergies  from  prior  acquisitions  as  well  as  organic  growth.  Our  information  technology  and  business  systems  and 
infrastructure could create product development or production work stoppages, unnecessarily increase our inventory, negatively 
impact product delivery times and quality and increase our compliance costs. In addition, an inability to maximize the utility 
and  benefit  of  our  current  information  technology  and  business  tools  could  impact  our  ability  to  meet  cost  reduction  and 
planned efficiency and operational improvement goals.

If  we  suffer  ransomware  breaches,  data  breaches,  or  phishing  diversions  involving  the  designs,  schematics,  or  source 
code for our products or other sensitive information, our business and financial results could be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to heightened risks of cyber intrusion as nation-state hackers seek access to technology used in 
U.S.  defense  programs  and  criminal  enterprise  hackers,  which  may  or  may  not  be  affiliated  with  foreign  governments,  use 
ransomware attacks to disable critical infrastructure and extort companies for ransom payments. We are also targeted by spear 
phishing attacks in which an email directed at a specific individual or department is disguised to appear to be from a trusted 
source  to  obtain  sensitive  information.  Like  all  DoD  contractors  that  process,  store,  or  transmit  controlled  unclassified 

26

information,  we  must  meet  minimum  security  standards  or  risk  losing  our  DoD  contracts.  A  breach,  whether  physical, 
electronic or otherwise, of the systems on which this sensitive data is stored could lead to damage or piracy of our products or 
to the shutdown of business systems. If we experience a data security breach from an external source or a data exfiltration from 
an insider threat, we may have a loss in sales or increased costs arising from the restoration or implementation of additional 
security measures, either of which could adversely affect our business and financial results. Other potential costs could include 
damage to our reputation, loss of brand value, incident response costs, loss of stock market value, regulatory inquiries, litigation 
and  management  distraction.  A  security  breach  that  involves  classified  information  could  subject  us  to  civil  or  criminal 
penalties,  loss  of  a  government  contract,  loss  of  access  to  classified  information,  or  debarment  as  a  government  contractor. 
Similarly, a breach that involves loss of customer-provided data could subject us to loss of a customer, loss of a program or 
contract, litigation costs and legal damages and reputational harm.  

We  may  be  unsuccessful  in  protecting  our  intellectual  property  rights  which  could  result  in  the  loss  of  a  competitive 
advantage. If we become subject to intellectual property infringement claims, we could incur significant expenses and 
could be prevented from selling specific products. 

Our ability to compete effectively against other companies in our industry depends, in part, on our ability to protect our 
current  and  future  proprietary  technology  under  patent,  copyright,  trademark,  trade  secret  and  unfair  competition  laws.  We 
cannot assure you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate, or that 
others will not develop technologies similar or superior to our technology or design around our proprietary rights. In addition, 
we may incur substantial costs in attempting to protect our proprietary rights.

Also, despite the steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to 
copy  or  reverse-engineer  aspects  of  our  products,  develop  similar  technology  independently,  or  otherwise  obtain  and  use 
information from our supply chain that we regard as proprietary, and we may be unable to successfully identify or prosecute 
unauthorized uses of our technology. Further, with respect to our issued patents and patent applications, we cannot assure you 
that any patents from any pending patent applications (or from any future patent applications) will be issued, that the scope of 
any  patent  protection  will  exclude  competitors  or  provide  competitive  advantages  to  us,  that  any  of  our  patents  will  be  held 
valid if subsequently challenged or that others will not claim rights in or ownership of the patents (and patent applications) and 
other proprietary rights held by us.

We may become subject to claims that we infringe the intellectual property rights of others. We cannot assure you that, if 
made, these claims will not be successful. Any claim of infringement could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against 
the  claim  even  if  the  claim  is  invalid  and  could  distract  management  from  other  business.  Any  judgment  against  us  could 
require  substantial  payment  in  damages  and  could  also  include  an  injunction  or  other  court  order  that  could  prevent  us  from 
offering certain products.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The  trading  price  of  our  common  stock  may  continue  to  be  volatile,  which  may  adversely  affect  our  business,  and 
investors in our common stock may experience substantial losses.

Our  stock  price,  like  that  of  other  technology  and  aerospace  and  defense  companies,  has  been  and  may  continue  to  be 
volatile.  The  stock  prices  for  companies  in  the  aerospace  and  defense  industry  may  continue  to  remain  volatile  given 
uncertainty and timing of funding for defense programs. This volatility may or may not be related to our operating performance. 
Our operating results, from time to time, may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, which could 
have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  market  price  of  our  common  stock.  Market  rumors  or  the  dissemination  of  false  or 
misleading information may impact our stock price. When the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock 
will sometimes file securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. If any shareholders were to file a 
lawsuit, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit, which could also divert the time and attention of management. 
During fiscal 2023, we experienced stock price declines following our earnings releases in August 2022 and May 2023 as well 
as after the announcement that the Board of Directors had concluded its review of strategic alternatives in June 2023, in each 
case with law firms announcing investigations after the event.

We  have  never  paid  cash  dividends  on  our  common  stock  and  we  do  not  anticipate  paying  any  dividends  in  the 
foreseeable future. 

We  have  not  declared  or  paid  cash  dividends  on  any  of  our  classes  of  capital  stock  to  date  and  we  currently  intend  to 
retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business and for future mergers and acquisitions. 
As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be the sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. 

27

We  may  need  additional  capital  and  may  not  be  able  to  raise  funds  on  acceptable  terms,  if  at  all.  In  addition,  any 
funding through the sale of additional common stock or other equity securities could result in additional dilution to our 
stockholders and any funding through indebtedness could restrict our operations.

We may require additional cash resources to finance our continued growth or other future developments, including any 
investments  or  acquisitions  we  may  decide  to  pursue.  The  amount  and  timing  of  such  additional  financing  needs  will  vary 
principally depending on the timing of new product and service launches, investments and/or acquisitions and the amount of 
cash flow from our operations. If our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional 
equity or debt securities or obtain a larger credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities or securities convertible into 
our  common  shares  could  result  in  additional  dilution  to  our  stockholders.  The  incurrence  of  additional  indebtedness  would 
result  in  increased  debt  service  obligations  and  could  result  in  operating  and  financing  covenants  that  would  restrict  our 
operations. We cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we fail to 
raise additional funds, we may need to sell debt or additional equity securities or to reduce our growth to a level that can be 
supported by our cash flow. 

Provisions in our organizational documents and Massachusetts law and other actions we have taken could make it more 
difficult for a third party to acquire us.

Provisions of our articles of organization and by-laws could have the effect of discouraging a third party from making a 
proposal to acquire us and could prevent certain changes in control, even if some shareholders might consider the proposal to be 
in  their  best  interest.  These  provisions  include  a  classified  board  of  directors,  advance  notice  to  our  board  of  directors  of 
shareholder proposals and director nominations, and limitations on the ability of shareholders to remove directors and to call 
shareholder meetings. In addition, we may issue shares of any class or series of preferred stock in the future without shareholder 
approval upon such terms as our board of directors may determine. For example, on December 27, 2021, the Board of Directors 
adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan which, as amended, expired on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders in October 
2022. The rights of holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of 
any such class or series of preferred stock that may be issued.

We  also  are  subject  to  the  Massachusetts  General  Laws  which,  subject  to  certain  exceptions,  prohibit  a  Massachusetts 
corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with any “interested shareholder” for a period of three 
years following the date that such shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. The Massachusetts Business Corporation Act 
permits directors to look beyond the interests of shareholders and consider other constituencies in discharging their duties. In 
determining what the director of a Massachusetts corporation reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation, a 
director may consider the interests of the corporation's employees, suppliers, creditors, and customers, the economy of the state, 
the region, and the nation, community and societal considerations and the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation 
and  its  shareholders,  including  the  possibility  that  these  interests  may  be  best  served  by  the  continued  independence  of  the 
corporation. 

Shareholder  activism  could  cause  us  to  incur  significant  expense,  disrupt  our  business,  result  in  a  proxy  contest  or 
litigation and impact our stock price.

We have been subject to shareholder activism and may be subject to such activism in the future, which could result in 
substantial  costs  and  divert  management’s  and  our  Board’s  attention  and  resources  from  our  business.  Such  shareholder 
activism  could  give  rise  to  perceived  uncertainties  as  to  our  future,  adversely  affect  our  relationships  with  our  employees, 
customers,  or  suppliers  and  make  it  more  difficult  to  attract  and  retain  qualified  personnel.  We  may  be  required  to  incur 
significant  fees  and  other  expenses  related  to  activist  shareholder  matters,  including  for  third  party  advisors.  We  may  be 
subjected to a proxy contest or to litigation by activist investors. Our stock price has been and could be subject to significant 
fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any shareholder activism. 

JANA  Partners  LLC  filed  a  Schedule  13D  on  December  23,  2021,  and  Starboard  Value  LP  filed  a  Schedule  13D  on 
January 13, 2022. Both JANA and Starboard indicated that they intended to engage with Mercury’s management. On June 23, 
2022, we entered into settlement agreements with each of JANA and Starboard that covered the appointment of two directors to 
our  Board  and  an  amendment  to  our  shareholder  rights  plan,  which  has  since  expired  as  of  our  2022  annual  meeting  of 
shareholders.  The  JANA  and  Starboard  settlement  agreements  contained  customary  standstill  provisions  that  expired  in  June 
2023.  On  June  15,  2023,  Starboard  filed  an  amended  Schedule  13D  indicating  that  it  owned  approximately  4.6%  of  our 
outstanding  shares.  On  July  6,  2023,  JANA  filed  a  new  Schedule  13D  indicating  that  it  owned  approximately  8%  of  our 
outstanding shares, and we announced that Scott Ostfeld, a managing partner at JANA, was being appointed to our Board of 
Directors. 

28

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES 

The following table sets forth our significant properties as of June 30, 2023: 

Location

Andover, MA

Phoenix, AZ

Hudson, NH

Oxnard, CA

Torrance, CA

Gulf Breeze, FL

Torrance, CA

Cypress, CA

Upper Saddle River, NJ

Alpharetta, GA

Chantilly, VA

Torrance, CA

Geneva, CH

Size in
Sq. Feet

145,262

125,756

121,553

72,673

58,405

51,061

49,250

42,770

36,223

35,005

32,789

31,505

27,287

Commitment

Leased, expiring 2032

Leased, expiring 2031

Leased, expiring 2030

Leased, expiring 2025

Leased, expiring 2029

Leased, expiring 2031

Leased, expiring 2025

Leased, expiring 2028

Leased, expiring 2027

Leased, expiring 2028

Leased, expiring 2025

Leased, expiring 2023

Leased, expiring 2027

We  actively  manage  our  facilities  and  are  in  pursuit  of  lease  extensions  or  alternative  locations  for  facilities  with 
expiration dates in the next one to two years. In addition, we lease a number of smaller offices around the world primarily for 
sales.  See  Note  B  and  Note  J  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  for  more  information  regarding  our  obligations  under 
leases.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We  are  subject  to  litigation,  claims,  investigations  and  audits  arising  from  time  to  time  in  the  ordinary  course  of  our 
business. Although legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have valid defenses with respect to those 
matters currently pending against us and intend to defend ourself vigorously. The outcome of these matters, individually and in 
the aggregate, is not expected to have a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations, or financial position.

On  June  23,  2021,  Embedded  Reps  of  America,  LLC  (“ERA”),  a  former  sales  representative,  and  James  Mazzola,  a 
principal  of  ERA,  filed  for  binding  arbitration  related  to  the  termination  of  ERA’s  sales  representative  agreement  raising 
multiple claims that aggregate to approximately $9 million in direct damages, with treble damages requested on a number of 
those  claims.  ERA  was  a  sales  representative  of  Themis  when  Themis  was  acquired  by  Mercury.  The  sales  representative 
agreement provided for termination by either party upon 30 days written notice with ERA entitled to commissions for orders 
obtained  by  ERA  with  product  shipment  occurring  prior  to  termination.  We  responded  to  the  complaint  in  July  2021.  An 
arbitration proceeding was held during September 2022, with final motions in October 2022, and oral arguments in November 
2022. The arbitrator issued its final ruling in January 2023, awarding ERA less than $0.1 million in damages and fees.

On  December  7,  2021,  counsel  for  National  Technical  Systems,  Inc.  (“NTS”)  sent  us  an  environmental  demand  letter 
pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 21E, Section 4A, and CERCLA 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, related to a site that 
NTS  formerly  owned  at  533  Main  Street,  Acton,  MA.  NTS  received  a  Notice  of  Responsibility  from  the  Massachusetts 
Department  of  Environmental  Protection  (“MassDEP”)  alleging  trichloroethene,  freon  and  1,4-dioxane  contamination  in  the 
groundwater emanating from NTS’s former site. NTS alleges in its demand letter that the operations of a predecessor company 
to Mercury that was acquired in our acquisition of the Microsemi Carve-Out Business that once owned and operated a facility at 
531  Main  Street,  Acton,  Massachusetts  contributed  to  the  groundwater  contamination.  NTS  is  seeking  payment  from  us  of 
NTS’s costs for any required environmental remediation. In April 2022, we engaged in a meet and confer session with NTS 
pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 21E, Section 4A to discuss the status of the environmental review performed 
by  NTS  and  its  licensed  site  professional.  In  addition,  in  November  2021,  we  responded  to  a  request  for  information  from 
MassDEP regarding the detection of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroakyl substances) in the Acton, Massachusetts Water District’s 
Conant  public  water  supply  wells  near  the  former  facility  at  531  Main  Street,  Acton,  Massachusetts  at  a  level  above  the 

29

standard that MassDEP published for PFAS in October 2020. We have not been contacted by NTS or MassDEP since the dates 
discussed above. It is too early to determine what responsibility, if any, we may have for these environmental matters.

On June 19, 2023, our Board of Directors received notice of our former CEO's resignation from his positions of President 
and Chief Executive Officer. The Board accepted his resignation effective June 24, 2023. In his notice, the former CEO claimed 
he was entitled to certain benefits, including equity vesting, severance, and other benefits, under his change in control severance 
agreement (the "CIC Agreement") because he had resigned with good reason during a potential change in control period. We 
dispute  these  claims  and  maintain  that  he  resigned  without  good  reason.  The  parties  must  submit  any  dispute  under  the  CIC 
Agreement to binding arbitration. We intend to contest vigorously any claims under the CIC Agreement and believe that we 
have strong arguments that our former CEO's claims lack merit. If the arbitrator rules in our favor, we may still need to pay the 
former  CEO's  reasonable  legal  fees.  If  instead  the  arbitrator  rules  for  the  former  CEO,  we  could  be  liable  for  up  to 
approximately $12.9 million, based on the closing price of our common stock on June 26, 2023, plus legal fees and expenses, 
for accelerated equity vesting, severance, and other benefits under the CIC Agreement. We categorically deny any wrongdoing 
or  liability  under  the  CIC  Agreement,  but  the  outcome  of  potential  arbitration  is  inherently  uncertain.  Accordingly,  it  is 
reasonably possible that we will incur a liability in this matter and we estimate the potential range of exposure from $0 to $12.9 
million, plus costs and attorneys' fees.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.1.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are appointed to office by the Board of Directors at the first board meeting following the Annual 
Meeting of Shareholders or at other board meetings as appropriate, and hold office until the first board meeting following the 
next  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  and  until  a  successor  is  chosen,  subject  to  prior  death,  resignation  or  removal. 
Information regarding our executive officers as of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is presented below.

William  L.  Ballhaus,  age  56,  joined  the  Company’s  Board  of  Directors  as  a  non-employee  director  in  June  2022,  was 
appointed  interim  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  on  June  24,  2023,  and  was  appointed  President  and  CEO  effective 
August 15, 2023. As previously announced, Mr. Ballhaus will become the Company’s Chairman of the Board effective with the 
2023  annual  meeting  of  shareholders.  Mr.  Ballhaus  has  significant  experience  in  the  aerospace,  defense,  and  technology 
industries, including multiple CEO roles, as well as experience in operational transformations and delivering strong results. He 
previously  served  as  Chairman  and  CEO  of  Blackboard,  Inc.,  a  leading  EdTech  company,  from  2016  until  its  merger  with 
Anthology  in  2021.  Prior  to  that,  he  served  as  CEO  and  President  of  SRA  International,  Inc.,  a  provider  of  information 
technology services, from 2011 until the creation of CSRA Inc. from SRA International Inc.’s and CSC’s U.S. public sector 
business. Before that, Mr. Ballhaus served as CEO and President of government contractor DynCorp International from 2008 to 
2010.  Mr.  Ballhaus  has  also  held  senior  leadership  positions  at  BAE  Systems,  Boeing,  and  Hughes,  where  he  led  global 
government and commercial technology businesses particularly focused on software and IT.

Christopher C. Cambria, age 65, joined Mercury in 2016 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and 
was  appointed  Executive  Vice  President,  General  Counsel  and  Secretary  in  2017.  Prior  to  joining  Mercury,  he  was  Vice 
President, General Counsel and Secretary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. from 2012 to 2016 and Vice President, General 
Counsel from 2011 to 2012. He was with L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. from 1997 through 2009 serving as Senior Vice 
President  and  Senior  Counsel,  Mergers  and  Acquisitions  from  2006  to  2009,  Senior  Vice  President,  Secretary  and  General 
Counsel from 2001 to 2006 and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1997 to 2001. Prior to L-3, Mr. Cambria 
was an Associate with Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson and Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

Allen  Couture,  age  55,  joined  Mercury  in  October  2022  as  Senior  Vice  President,  Execution  Excellence  and  became 
Executive Vice President, Execution Excellence in July 2023. Mr. Couture joined Mercury from Raytheon Technologies, where 
he spent 10 years in leadership roles, most recently serving as Vice President of Operations & Security at Raytheon Missiles & 
Defense. Earlier in his career, Mr. Couture held senior manufacturing and operations roles with Hawker Beechcraft, including 
Vice President of Program Management and Vice President of Engineering & Product Development. He spent 15 years in the 
Canadian Armed Forces Infantry Reserves.  

David  E.  Farnsworth,  age  63,  joined  Mercury  in  July  2023  as  Executive  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  and 
Treasurer. Mr. Farnsworth was the Chief Financial Officer of HawkEye 360, a radio frequency data analytics company from 
2020  to  2023.  Before  joining  HawkEye  360,  Mr.  Farnsworth  was  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  for  Integrated 
Defense  Systems  of  Raytheon  Company  from  2018  to  2020.  Before  that,  he  was  CFO  for  the  Intelligence,  Information  and 
Services segment of Raytheon.

30

Christine F. Harbison, age 57, joined Mercury in March 2023 as Executive Vice President, Chief Growth Officer. Ms. 
Harbison joined Mercury from Northrop Grumman’s Defense Systems sector, where she served as Vice President and General 
Manager of the Combat Systems and Mission Readiness division from 2021 to 2023. Prior to that, she was Vice President of 
Northrop’s C4MB business from 2020 to 2021 and Vice President of Northrop’s Advanced Ground Sensors business from 2018 
to 2019 and held roles of increasing importance at Raytheon Company. 

James M. Stevison, age 57, joined Mercury in October 2021 as Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer and 
became  Executive  Vice  President  and  President  of  Mercury’s  Mission  Systems  Division  in  October  2022.  Dr.  Stevison  has 
more than 18 years of global experience in the aerospace and defense industry including technology development, operations 
management,  mergers,  acquisitions,  and  business  growth.  Prior  to  joining  Mercury,  he  was  Vice  President  of  Strategy  for 
Raytheon  Missiles  &  Defense  from  2020  to  2021.  He  also  served  as  Vice  President  and  General  Manager  of  Strategic  and 
Naval Systems at Raytheon Missiles Systems from 2019 to 2020 as well as Vice President and General Manager for Air and 
Missile  Defense  Systems  at  Raytheon  Missile  Systems  from  2015  to  2019.  Prior  to  that,  he  was  the  senior  director  of  the 
SM-3®  program,  where  he  was  responsible  for  all  variants  of  the  SM-3®  missile  portfolio,  both  domestically  and 
internationally.  Dr.  Stevison  has  previously  held  senior  leadership  roles  at  Lockheed  Martin  and  at  Miltec  Systems,  a 
Ducommun Company. A U.S. Army veteran, Dr. Stevison retired from the Army in 2005, following an accomplished 20-year 
military  career  that  included  leadership  roles  with  the  Missile  Defense  Agency  and  the  U.S.  Army  Aviation  and  Missile 
Command.

Charles R. Wells, IV, age 51, joined the Company in November 2021 as its Executive Vice President and President of 
Mercury’s  Microelectronics  Division.  Mr.  Wells  has  more  than  25  years’  experience  across  multiple  disciplines  including 
engineering, business development, program management and executive management. Previously, he served as Vice President 
and General Manager for the Unmanned & Integrated Solutions Business Unit of Teledyne FLIR from 2018 to 2021 with full 
P&L responsibility while ensuring high levels of product quality and customer satisfaction. Earlier in his career, he worked as a 
DoD civilian supporting the development and fielding of world-wide C4ISR networks and information systems. He also held 
positions  in  Northrop  Grumman  and  ICX  Technologies  and  served  as  a  private  consultant  for  large  aerospace  and  defense 
companies.

31

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our  common  stock  is  listed  and  traded  on  the  Nasdaq  Global  Select  Market  under  the  symbol  MRCY.  The  following 
table  sets  forth,  for  the  fiscal  periods  indicated,  the  high  and  low  sale  prices  per  share  for  our  common  stock  during  such 
periods. Such market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission.

2023 Fourth quarter

Third quarter

Second quarter

First quarter

2022 Fourth quarter

Third quarter

Second quarter

First quarter

High

Low

52.36  $ 

56.19  $ 

53.58  $ 

63.66  $ 

66.04  $ 

69.81  $ 

55.92  $ 

66.78  $ 

31.50 

44.56 

41.78 

40.60 

54.24 

51.11 

46.71 

45.31 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

As of June 30, 2023, we had 710 record shareholders and 24,235 nominee holders.

Dividend Policy

We  have  never  declared  or  paid  cash  dividends  on  shares  of  our  common  stock.  We  currently  intend  to  retain  any 
earnings for future growth. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that any cash dividends will be declared or paid on our common 
stock in the foreseeable future.

Net Share Settlement Plans

The following table includes information with respect to net share settlements we made of our common stock during the 

fiscal year ended June 30, 2023:

Period of Net Share Settlement

Total Number of Shares Net Settled (1)

Average Price Per Share

July 2, 2022 - September 30, 2022

October 1, 2022 - December 30, 2022

December 31, 2022 - March 31, 2023

April 1, 2023 - June 30, 2023

Total

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1 

— 

— 

— 

1 

62.52 

— 

— 

— 

(1) Represents shares we net settled in connection with the surrender of shares to cover the minimum taxes on vesting of 

restricted stock. Presented in thousands.

Share Repurchase Plans

During fiscal 2023, we had no active share repurchase programs.

Equity Compensation Plans

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Shareholders Meeting.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Part II, Item 6 is no longer required as the Company has elected to early adopt the change to Item 301 of Regulation S-K 

contained in SEC Release No. 33-10890.

32

 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS 
OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

From time to time, information provided, statements made by our employees or information included in our filings with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) may contain statements that are not historical facts but that are “forward-
looking  statements,”  which  involve  risks  and  uncertainties.  You  can  identify  these  statements  by  the  words  “may,”  “will,” 
“could,” “should,” “would,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “likely,” “forecast,” 
“probable,” “potential,” and similar expressions.  These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could 
cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  those  projected  or  anticipated.  Such  risks  and  uncertainties  include,  but  are  not 
limited  to,  continued  funding  of  defense  programs,  the  timing  and  amounts  of  such  funding,  general  economic  and  business 
conditions,  including  unforeseen  weakness  in  the  Company’s  markets,  effects  of  any  U.S.  federal  government  shutdown  or 
extended  continuing  resolution,  effects  of  geopolitical  unrest  and  regional  conflicts,  competition,  changes  in  technology  and 
methods of marketing, delays in or cost increases related to completing development, engineering and manufacturing programs, 
changes  in  customer  order  patterns,  changes  in  product  mix,  continued  success  in  technological  advances  and  delivering 
technological innovations, changes in, or in the U.S. government’s interpretation of, federal export control or procurement rules 
and regulations, changes in, or in the interpretation or enforcement of, environmental rules and regulations, market acceptance 
of  the  Company's  products,  shortages  in  or  delays  in  receiving  components,  supply  chain  delays  or  volatility  for  critical 
components  such  as  semiconductors,  production  delays  or  unanticipated  expenses  including  due  to  quality  issues  or 
manufacturing execution issues, failure to achieve or maintain manufacturing quality certifications, such as AS9100, the impact 
of the COVID pandemic and supply chain disruption, inflation and labor shortages, among other things, on program execution 
and the resulting effect on customer satisfaction, inability to fully realize the expected benefits from acquisitions, restructurings, 
and  execution  excellence  initiatives  or  delays  in  realizing  such  benefits,  challenges  in  integrating  acquired  businesses  and 
achieving  anticipated  synergies,  effects  of  shareholder  activism,  increases  in  interest  rates,  changes  to  industrial  security  and 
cyber-security  regulations  and  requirements  and  impacts  from  any  cyber  or  insider  threat  events,  changes  in  tax  rates  or  tax 
regulations, such as the deductibility of internal research and development, changes to interest rate swaps or other cash flow 
hedging  arrangements,  changes  to  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  difficulties  in  retaining  key  employees  and 
customers,  which  difficulties  may  be  impacted  by  the  termination  of  the  Company’s  announced  strategic  review  initiative, 
unanticipated  challenges  with  the  transition  of  the  Company’s  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  roles, 
including  any  dispute  arising  with  the  former  CEO  over  his  resignation,  unanticipated  costs  under  fixed-price  service  and 
system integration engagements, and various other factors beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties also include such 
additional risk factors as set forth under Part I-Item 1A (Risk Factors) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We caution readers 
not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We undertake no 
obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is 
made.

OVERVIEW

Mercury  Systems,  Inc.  is  a  technology  company  that  delivers  processing  power  for  the  most  demanding  aerospace  and 
defense  missions.  Headquartered  in  Andover,  Massachusetts,  our  end-to-end  processing  platform  enables  a  broad  range  of 
aerospace and defense programs, optimized for mission success in some of the most challenging and demanding environments. 
Processing technologies that comprise our platform include signal solutions, display, software applications, networking, storage 
and secure processing. Our innovative solutions are mission-ready, trusted and secure, software-defined and open and modular 
meeting our customers’ cost and schedule needs today by allowing them to use or modify our products to suit their mission. 
Customers access our solutions via the Mercury Processing Platform, which encompasses the broad scope of our investments in 
technologies,  companies,  products,  services  and  the  expertise  of  our  people.  Ultimately,  we  connect  our  customers  to  what 
matters most to them. We connect commercial technology to defense, people to data and partners to opportunities. And, at the 
most  human  level,  we  connect  what  we  do  to  our  customers’  missions;  supporting  the  people  for  whom  safety,  security  and 
protecting freedom are of paramount importance.

As  a  leading  manufacturer  of  essential  components,  products,  modules  and  subsystems,  we  sell  to  defense  prime 
contractors, the U.S. government and original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) commercial aerospace companies. Mercury 
has built a trusted, robust portfolio of proven product solutions, leveraging the most advanced commercial silicon technologies 
and  purpose-built  to  exceed  the  performance  needs  of  our  defense  and  commercial  customers.  Customers  add  their  own 
applications and algorithms to our specialized, secure and innovative products and pre-integrated solutions. This allows them to 
complete  their  full  system  by  integrating  with  their  platform,  the  sensor  technology  and,  increasingly,  the  processing  from 
Mercury. Our products and solutions are deployed in more than 300 programs with over 25 different defense prime contractors 
and commercial aviation customers. 

33

Mercury’s transformational business model accelerates the process of making new technology profoundly more accessible 
to  our  customers  by  bridging  the  gap  between  commercial  technology  and  aerospace  and  defense  applications  on  time 
constraints that matter. Our long-standing deep relationships with leading high-tech and other commercial companies, coupled 
with our high level of research and development (“R&D”) investments on a percentage basis and industry-leading trusted and 
secure design and manufacturing capabilities, are the foundational tenets of this highly successful model. We are leading the 
development  and  adaptation  of  commercial  technology  for  aerospace  and  defense  solutions.  From  chip-scale  to  system  scale 
and  from  data,  including  radio  frequency  (“RF”)  to  digital  to  decision,  we  make  mission-critical  technologies  safe,  secure, 
affordable and relevant for our customers. 

 Our capabilities, technology, people and R&D investment strategy combine to differentiate Mercury in our industry. We 
maintain  our  technological  edge  by  investing  in  critical  capabilities  and  intellectual  property  (“IP”  or  “building  blocks”)  in 
processing, leveraging open standards and open architectures to adapt quickly those building blocks into solutions for highly 
data-intensive applications, including emerging needs in areas such as artificial intelligence (“AI”).

Our  mission  critical  solutions  are  deployed  by  our  customers  for  a  variety  of  applications  including  command,  control, 
communications,  computers,  intelligence,  surveillance  and  reconnaissance  (“C4ISR”),  electronic  intelligence,  mission 
computing avionics, electro-optical/infrared (“EO/IR”), electronic warfare, weapons and missile defense, hypersonics and radar. 

Since we conduct much of our business with our defense customers via commercial items, requests by customers are a 
primary driver of revenue fluctuations from quarter to quarter. Customers specify delivery date requirements that coincide with 
their need for our products. Because these customers may use our products in connection with a variety of defense programs or 
other projects of different sizes and durations, a customer’s orders for one quarter generally do not indicate a trend for future 
orders  by  that  customer.  Additionally,  order  patterns  do  not  necessarily  correlate  amongst  customers  and,  therefore,  we 
generally cannot identify sequential quarterly trends.

As of June 30, 2023, we had 2,596 employees. Our consolidated revenues, acquired revenues, net loss, diluted net loss 
per  share,  adjusted  EPS,  and  adjusted  EBITDA  for  fiscal  2023  were  $973.9  million,  $25.1  million,  $(28.3)  million,  $(0.50), 
$1.00  and  $132.3  million,  respectively.  Our  consolidated  revenues,  acquired  revenues,  net  income,  EPS,  adjusted  EPS  and 
adjusted  EBITDA  for  fiscal  2022  were  $988.2  million,  $6.0  million,  $11.3  million,  $0.20,  $2.19  and  $200.5  million, 
respectively.  See  the  Non-GAAP  Financial  Measures  section  for  a  reconciliation  to  our  most  directly  comparable  GAAP 
financial measures.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS:

FISCAL 2023

Beginning in January 2023, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) engaged in a proactive and rigorous process to evaluate 
strategic alternatives, focused on a potential sale of Mercury. As part of the review, the Board authorized its financial advisors 
to contact and hold discussions with more than 40 potential bidders, including a wide range of strategic parties and financial 
sponsors. The Board executed confidentiality agreements with 20 parties. The two proposals ultimately received did not yield 
options  for  a  sale  that  would  reflect  the  intrinsic  value  of  Mercury.  Accordingly,  in  a  press  release  dated  June  23,  2023,  we 
announced,  among  other  things,  that  the  independent  members  of  the  Board  unanimously  determined  to  conclude  the  sale 
process  and  instead  focus  on  all  potential  opportunities  to  create  value,  including  through  the  enhanced  execution  of  our 
strategic plan under refreshed leadership. 

On June 19, 2023, the Company’s former President and Chief Executive Officer, delivered a letter to the Board resigning 
from his positions of President and Chief Executive Officer and the Board has accepted his resignation effective as of June 24, 
2023. On June 23, 2023, we announced the Board has appointed William L. Ballhaus as the Company’s interim President and 
Chief Executive Officer, effective as of June 24, 2023. 

On  June  29,  2023,  we  announced  that  David  E.  Farnsworth  will  be  joining  the  Company  as  Executive  Vice  President, 

Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, on July 17, 2023.

On July 18, 2023, we executed the planned evolution of our 1MPACT value creation initiative, embedding the processes 
and execution of 1MPACT into our Execution Excellence organization. The 1MPACT office in its current form has concluded 
its  responsibilities,  having  successfully  incorporated  the  principles  behind  1MPACT  into  how  we  think  about  continuous 
improvement at all levels of the Company. 

On August 15, 2023, we announced William L. Ballhaus has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer.

34

FISCAL 2022

On  February  28,  2022,  we  amended  our  existing  revolving  credit  facility  (the  “Revolver”)  to  increase  and  extend  the 
borrowing capacity to a $1.1 billion, 5-year revolving credit line, with the maturity extended to February 28, 2027. See Note M 
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Revolver. 

On November 29, 2021, we acquired Atlanta Micro, Inc. (“Atlanta Micro”) for a purchase price of $90.0 million, subject 
to  net  working  capital  and  net  debt  adjustments.  Based  in  Norcross,  Georgia,  Atlanta  Micro  is  a  leading  designer  and 
manufacturer of high-performance RF modules and components, including advanced monolithic microwave integrated circuits 
which are critical for high-speed data acquisition applications including electronic warfare, radar and weapons. We funded the 
acquisition through our Revolver.

On September 27, 2021, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire Avalex Technologies (“Avalex”) for a purchase price 
of $155.0 million, subject to net working capital and net debt adjustments. On November 5, 2021, the transaction closed and we 
acquired Avalex. Based in Gulf Breeze, Florida, Avalex is a provider of mission-critical avionics, including rugged displays, 
integrated communications management systems, digital video recorders and warning systems. We funded the acquisition with 
our Revolver.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

FISCAL 2023 VS. FISCAL 2022 

Results  of  operations  for  fiscal  2023  include  full  period  results  from  the  acquisitions  of  Avalex  and  Atlanta  Micro. 
Results of operations for fiscal 2022 include only results from the acquisition dates for Avalex and Atlanta Micro, which were 
acquired on November 5, 2021 and November 29, 2021, respectively. Accordingly, the periods presented below are not directly 
comparable. The Company has applied the FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K, which limits the 
discussion to the two most recent fiscal years. Refer to Item 7 of the Company's Form 10-K issued on August 16, 2022 for prior 
year discussion related to fiscal 2022.

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, financial data from the Consolidated Statements of Operations 

and Comprehensive (Loss) Income:

(In thousands)
Net revenues

Cost of revenues

Gross margin

Operating expenses:

Selling, general and administrative

Research and development

Amortization of intangible assets

Restructuring and other charges
Acquisition costs and other related expenses

Total operating expenses

(Loss) income from operations

Interest income

Interest expense

Other expense, net

(Loss) income before income taxes

Income tax (benefit) provision

Net (loss) income

REVENUES

Fiscal 2023

As a % of
Total Net
Revenue

Fiscal 2022

As a % of
Total Net
Revenue

$ 

973,882 

 100.0 % $ 

988,197 

 100.0 %

657,154 

316,728 

160,637 

108,799 
53,552 
6,981 
8,444 

338,413 

(21,685) 

1,053 

(25,159) 

(2,751) 

(48,542) 

(20,207) 

 67.5 

 32.5 

 16.5 

 11.2 
 5.5 
 0.7 
 0.8 

 34.7 

 (2.2) 

 0.1 

 (2.6) 

 (0.3) 

 (5.0) 

 (2.1) 

593,241 

394,956 

157,044 

107,169 
60,267 
27,445 
11,421 

363,346 

31,610 

143 

(5,806) 

(7,552) 

18,395 

7,120 

 60.0 

 40.0 

 15.9 

 10.8 
 6.1 
 2.8 
 1.2 

 36.8 

 3.2 

 — 

 (0.6) 

 (0.8) 

 1.9 

 0.8 

$ 

(28,335) 

 (2.9) % $ 

11,275 

 1.1 %

Total  revenues  decreased  $14.3  million,  or  1.4%,  to  $973.9  million  during  fiscal  2023,  as  compared  to  $988.2  million 
during fiscal 2022 including “acquired revenue” which represents net revenue from acquired businesses that have been part of 
Mercury for completion of four full fiscal quarters or less (and excludes any intercompany transactions). After the completion 
of  four  full  fiscal  quarters,  acquired  businesses  will  be  treated  as  organic  for  current  and  comparable  historical  periods.  The 

35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
decrease  in  total  revenue  was  primarily  due  to  $33.3  million  less  organic  revenues,  partially  offset  by  $19.0  million  of 
additional acquired revenues. These decreases predominantly resulted from program execution delays, especially as related to 
approximately  20  challenged  programs,  primarily  development  in  nature,  for  which  completion  is  a  precursor  to  follow-on 
production awards. In addition, incremental cost growth on these challenged programs delayed progress, and, therefore, revenue 
recognition  in  the  fiscal  year.  Revenues  from  integrated  subsystems  decreased  $77.2  million  or  11.8%,  partially  offset  by 
increases to modules and sub-assemblies and components which increased $33.0 million or 19.8% and $29.8 million or 17.8%, 
respectively, during fiscal 2023. The decrease in total revenue was primarily from the radar, EW, and other end applications 
which decreased $21.7 million, $13.1 million, and $2.4 million, respectively, and were partially offset by increases to the C4I 
and other sensor and effector end applications which increased $14.3 million and $8.5 million, respectively. The decrease was 
predominately in naval platforms which decreased $18.6 million and was partially offset by an increase of $5.9 million in other 
platforms during fiscal 2023. The largest program decreases were related to the MH-60, Filthy Buzzard, CPS, THAAD, and a 
classified C2 program. There were no individual programs comprising 10% or more of our revenues for fiscal 2023 and 2022. 
See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for a reconciliation to our most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. 

GROSS MARGIN

Gross margin was 32.5% for fiscal 2023, a decrease of 750 basis points from the 40.0% gross margin achieved during 
fiscal  2022.  The  lower  gross  margin  was  primarily  driven  by  approximately  $56  million  of  impact  as  a  result  of  execution 
challenges  across  approximately  20  programs,  primarily  development  in  nature.  Program  mix  was  more  heavily  weighted 
towards  development  programs  as  compared  to  the  prior  period,  which  carry  lower  average  gross  margins  as  compared  to 
production  programs.  These  programs  warrant  higher  engineering  labor  for  customized  development,  production  and  service 
activities.  The  nature  of  these  efforts  results  in  lower  margin  content,  but  serve  as  pre-cursors  to  higher  margin  production 
awards. 

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

Selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  increased  $3.6  million,  or  2.3%,  to  $160.6  million  during  fiscal  2023  as 
compared  to  $157.0  million  during  fiscal  2022.  The  increase  was  primarily  related  to  an  increase  in  our  401(k)  matching 
contributions from 3% to 6%, a full period of the Avalex and Atlanta Micro acquisitions driving an incremental $4.0 million of 
expense, and an increase in headcount and salary rate increases, partially offset by forfeitures of our former CEO's stock-based 
compensation of $6.8 million. 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development expenses increased $1.6 million, or 1.5%, to $108.8 million during fiscal 2023, as compared 
to $107.2 million for fiscal 2022. The increase was primarily related to an increase in our 401(k) matching contributions from 
3% to 6%.

AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Amortization  of  intangible  assets  decreased  $6.7  million  to  $53.6  million  during  fiscal  2023,  as  compared  to  $60.3 
million for fiscal 2022, primarily due to the backlog from our Avalex and Atlanta Micro acquisitions being fully amortized in 
fiscal 2023.

RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES

During fiscal 2023, the Company incurred $7.0 million of restructuring and other charges, as compared to $27.4 million 
in  fiscal  2022.  Restructuring  and  other  charges  during  fiscal  2023  primarily  related  to  $3.4  million  of  severance  costs,  $1.8 
million of costs for facility optimization efforts, including $1.3 million related to lease asset impairment, and $1.8 million of 
third party consulting costs. Restructuring and other charges during fiscal 2022 primarily related to 1MPACT including $17.4 
million  of  third  party  consulting  costs,  as  well  as  $9.2  million  of  severance  costs  associated  with  the  elimination  of 
approximately  135  positions  across  manufacturing,  SG&A  and  R&D  based  on  ongoing  talent  and  workforce  optimization 
efforts.  In  addition,  fiscal  2022  includes  $0.8  million  of  costs  for  facilities  optimization  efforts  associated  with  1MPACT, 
including $0.5 million related to lease asset impairment.

In the first quarter of 2024, we have initiated several immediate cost savings measures that simplify our organizational 
structure,  facilitate  clearer  accountability,  and  align  to  our  priorities,  including:  (i)  embedding  the  1MPACT  value  creation 
initiatives  and  execution  into  our  operations;  (ii)  streamlining  organizational  structure  and  removing  areas  of  redundancy 
between corporate and divisional organizations; and (iii) reduce selling, general, and administrative headcount and rebalancing 
discretionary and third party spending to better align with our priority areas. On July 20, 2023, we executed the plan to embed 
the 1MPACT value creation initiatives into operations, and on August 9, 2023, we approved and initiated a workforce reduction 
that,  together  with  the  1MPACT  related  action,  eliminates  approximately  150  positions,  resulting  in  expected  restructuring 
charges of approximately $9.0 million. These charges are for employee separation costs and will be classified as restructuring 
and other charges within our Statement of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the fiscal quarter ending September 
29, 2023. We expect approximately $15 million - $17 million of net savings from these actions for our fiscal year ending June 

36

28, 2024. The headcount savings, combined with other non-headcount savings, including discretionary and third party spend 
primarily within SG&A, are expected to yield a total fiscal year 2024 net savings of approximately $20 million -22 million and 
annualized net savings of approximately $24 million.

ACQUISITION COSTS AND OTHER RELATED EXPENSES

Acquisition costs and other related expenses were $8.4 million during fiscal 2023, as compared to $11.4 million during 
fiscal 2022. The acquisition costs and other related expenses incurred during fiscal 2023 were primarily related to $3.7 million 
associated  with  the  Board's  review  of  strategic  alternatives  and  $3.5  million  for  third  party  advisory  fees  in  connection  with 
engagements by activist investors. The acquisition costs and other related expenses incurred during fiscal 2022 were related to 
the  acquisitions  of  Avalex  and  Atlanta  Micro,  as  well  as  $6.8  million  for  third  party  advisory  fees  and  settlement  costs  in 
connection with engagements by activist investors.

INTEREST INCOME 

Interest  income  increased  to  $1.1  million  in  fiscal  2023  from  $0.1  million  in  fiscal  2022.  This  was  driven  by  higher 

interest rates during fiscal 2023 as compared to fiscal 2022. 

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense for fiscal 2023 increased to $25.2 million, as compared to $5.8 million in fiscal 2022. The increase was 
driven by an increase in interest rate and additional borrowings on our Revolver. Borrowings under our revolver were $511.5 
million in fiscal 2023 as compared to $451.5 million in fiscal 2022. 

OTHER EXPENSE, NET

Other expense, net was $2.8 million during fiscal 2023, as compared to $7.6 million in fiscal 2022. Fiscal 2023 includes 
$2.3  million  of  financing  and  registration  fees  and  $2.1  million  of  litigation  and  settlement  expenses,  partially  offset  by  net 
foreign  currency  translation  gains  of  $1.6  million.  Fiscal  2022  includes  $2.7  million  of  financing  and  registration  fees,  $2.4 
million of net foreign currency translation losses, and $1.9 million of litigation and settlement expenses.

INCOME TAXES 

We recorded an income tax (benefit) provision of $(20.2) million and $7.1 million on (loss) income before income taxes 
of $(48.5) million and $18.4 million for fiscal years 2023 and 2022, respectively. Fiscal 2023 includes the impact of the  Tax 
Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("TCJA"), which requires companies to capitalize and amortize domestic research and development 
expenditures  over  five  years  for  tax  purposes,  and  foreign  research  and  development  expenditures  over  fifteen  years  for  tax 
purposes. The cash outflow from the TJCA provision was $26 million in fiscal 2023.

The effective tax rate for fiscal  2023 differed from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to federal and state 
research  and  development  tax  credits,  releases  to  reserves  for  unrecognized  income  tax  benefits,  state  taxes,  valuation 
allowances recorded and excess tax provisions related to stock compensation.

The effective tax rate for fiscal  2022 differed from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to federal and state 
research and development tax credits, non-deductible compensation, provision to return adjustments, state taxes and excess tax 
provisions related to stock compensation.

On  August  16,  2022,  President  Biden  signed  the  Inflation  Reduction  Act  of  2022  into  law  which  contained  provisions 
that include a 15% corporate minimum tax effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022 and a 1% excise tax 
on certain stock buybacks after December 31, 2022. We expect the impact of this legislation to be immaterial.  

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our primary sources of liquidity come from existing cash and cash generated from operations, our Revolver, our ability 
to  raise  capital  under  our  universal  shelf  registration  statement  and  our  ability  to  factor  our  receivables.  Our  near-term  fixed 
commitments for cash expenditures consist primarily of payments under operating leases and inventory purchase commitments. 
We plan to continue to invest in improvements to our facilities, continuous evaluation of potential acquisition opportunities and 
internal R&D to promote future growth, including new opportunities in avionics mission computers, secure processing, radar 
modernization and trusted custom microelectronics. 

Based  on  our  current  plans  and  business  conditions,  we  believe  that  existing  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  our  available 
Revolver,  cash  generated  from  operations  and  our  financing  capabilities  will  be  sufficient  to  satisfy  our  anticipated  cash 
requirements for at least the next twelve months.

37

Shelf Registration Statement

On  September  14,  2020,  we  filed  a  shelf  registration  statement  on  Form  S-3ASR  with  the  SEC.  The  shelf  registration 
statement, which was effective upon filing with the SEC, registered each of the following securities: debt securities, preferred 
stock, common stock, warrants and units. We intend to use the proceeds from financings using the shelf registration statement 
for general corporate purposes, which may include the following:

•

•

•

•

•

the acquisition of other companies or businesses;

the repayment and refinancing of debt;

capital expenditures;

working capital; and

other purposes as described in the prospectus supplement.

We have an unlimited amount available under the shelf registration statement.  We intend to file a renewal of the S-3ASR 

in September 2023 upon the expiration of the three-year term of the current shelf registration statement.

Revolving Credit Facilities

On February 28, 2022, we amended the Revolver to increase and extend the borrowing capacity to a $1.1 billion, 5-year 
revolving  credit  line,  with  the  maturity  extended  to  February  28,  2027.  The  current  borrowing  capacity  as  defined  under  the 
Revolver as of June 30, 2023 is approximately $865.0 million, of which we had borrowings against of $511.5 million. See Note 
M in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Revolver.

Receivables Purchase Agreement

On  September  27,  2022,  we  entered  into  an  uncommitted  receivables  purchase  agreement  (“RPA”)  with  Bank  of  the 
West, as purchaser, pursuant to which we may offer to sell certain customer receivables, subject to the terms and conditions of 
the RPA. The RPA is an uncommitted arrangement such that we are not obligated to sell any receivables and Bank of the West 
has  no  obligation  to  purchase  any  receivables  from  us.  Pursuant  to  the  RPA,  Bank  of  the  West  may  purchase  certain  of  our 
customer receivables at a discounted rate, subject to a limit that as of any date, the total amount of purchased receivables held 
by Bank of the West, less the amount of all collections received on such receivables, may not exceed $20.0 million. The RPA 
has  an  indefinite  term  and  the  agreement  remains  in  effect  until  it  is  terminated  by  either  party.  On  March  14,  2023,  we 
amended the RPA to increase the capacity from $20.0 million to $30.6 million. On June 21, 2023, we upsized the capacity from 
$30.6 million to $60.0 million. We factored accounts receivable and incurred factoring fees of approximately $30.5 million and 
$0.6 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2023. We did not factor any accounts receivable or incur any 
factoring fees for the twelve months ended July 1, 2022.

CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

Net cash used in investing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

For the Fiscal Years Ended 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

$ 
$ 
$ 

$ 

(21,254)  $ 

(18,869)  $ 

97,247 

(38,561)  $ 
65,429  $ 
5,909  $ 

(274,320)  $ 
245,754  $ 
(48,185)  $ 

(416,887) 
206,229 
(112,999) 

71,563  $ 

65,654  $ 

113,839 

Our  cash  and  cash  equivalents  increased  by  $5.9  million  during  fiscal  2023  primarily  as  the  result  of  $65.4  million 
provided by financing activities, partially offset by $38.8 million purchases of property and equipment and $21.3 million used 
in operating activities.

38

Operating Activities

During fiscal 2023, we had an outflow of $21.3 million in cash from operating activities, an increase of $2.4 million, as 
compared  to  $18.9  million  during  fiscal  2022.  The  increase  was  primarily  due  to  higher  outflows  for  inventory  to  support 
customer  delivery  schedules  for  existing  and  future  awards  as  well  as  accounts  payable,  accrued  expenses  and  accrued 
compensation.  Cash  paid  for  interest  and  income  taxes  during  fiscal  2023  increased  by  $21.8  million  and  $10.1  million, 
respectively,  as  compared  to  fiscal  2022  further  contributing  to  the  decrease.  The  decrease  was  partially  offset  by  lower 
outflows  from  unbilled  receivables  and  costs  in  excess  of  billings,  additional  deferred  revenues  and  customer  advances,  the 
change from a cash based 401(k) match to a stock based 401(k) match during fiscal 2023 and a $6.0 million cash receipt for the 
termination of an interest rate swap.

Investing Activities

During fiscal 2023, we invested $38.6 million, a decrease of $235.7 million, as compared to $274.3 million during fiscal 
2022 primarily driven by the acquisitions of Avalex and Atlanta Micro, in the previous year. The decrease was also driven by 
$3.4  million  less  other  investing  activities,  partially  offset  by  $11.1  million  higher  purchases  of  property  and  equipment  as 
compared to fiscal 2022. 

Financing Activities

During fiscal 2023, we had $65.4 million in cash provided by financing activities, as compared to $245.8 million during 
fiscal 2022. During fiscal 2023, we had $60.0 million of net borrowings on our Revolver as compared to $251.5 million of net 
borrowings during fiscal 2022. We also had $0.1 million of cash payments related to the purchase and retirement of common 
stock  used  to  settle  individual  employees'  tax  liabilities  associated  with  the  annual  vesting  of  restricted  stock  awards,  as 
compared to $8.2 million in fiscal 2022. 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following is a schedule of our commitments and contractual obligations outstanding at June 30, 2023:

(In thousands)
Operating leases

Purchase obligations

Total

Less Than
1 Year

1-3
Years

3-5
Years

More Than
5 Years

$ 

92,653  $ 

14,195  $ 

27,094  $ 

24,016  $ 

27,348 

127,134 

127,134 

— 

— 

— 

$ 

219,787  $ 

141,329  $ 

27,094  $ 

24,016  $ 

27,348 

See  Note  B  and  Note  J  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  for  more  information  regarding  our  obligations  under 

leases.

Purchase  obligations  represent  open  non-cancelable  purchase  commitments  for  certain  inventory  components  and 
services  used  in  normal  operations.  The  purchase  commitments  covered  by  these  agreements  are  for  less  than  one  year  and 
aggregated $127.1 million at June 30, 2023.

We had a liability at June 30, 2023 of $5.2 million for uncertain tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be 
taken in various income tax returns. We do not know the ultimate resolution of these uncertain tax positions and as such, do not 
know the ultimate timing of payments related to this liability. Accordingly, these amounts are not included in the above table.

Our  standard  product  sales  and  license  agreements  entered  into  in  the  ordinary  course  of  business  typically  contain  an 
indemnification  provision  pursuant  to  which  we  indemnify,  hold  harmless,  and  agree  to  reimburse  the  indemnified  party  for 
losses suffered or incurred in connection with certain intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect 
to our products. Such provisions generally survive termination or expiration of the agreements. The potential amount of future 
payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is, in some instances, unlimited.

As part of our strategy for growth, we continue to explore acquisitions or strategic alliances. The associated acquisition 
costs incurred in the form of professional fees and services may be material to the future periods in which they occur, regardless 
of whether the acquisition is ultimately completed. 

We may elect from time to time to purchase and subsequently retire shares of common stock in order to settle employees’ 
tax  liabilities  associated  with  vesting  of  a  restricted  stock  award.  These  transactions  would  be  treated  as  a  use  of  cash  in 
financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Other than certain indemnification provisions, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities, 
guarantee  contracts,  retained  or  contingent  interests  in  transferred  assets,  or  any  obligation  arising  out  of  a  material  variable 

39

 
 
 
 
 
interest in an unconsolidated entity. We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not consolidated in the financial 
statements. Additionally, we do not have an interest in, or relationships with, any special purpose entities.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During fiscal 2023 and 2022, we did not engage in any related party transactions.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

In  our  periodic  communications,  we  discuss  certain  important  measures  that  are  not  calculated  according  to  U.S. 
generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“GAAP”),  including  adjusted  EBITDA,  adjusted  income,  adjusted  EPS,  free  cash 
flow, organic revenue and acquired revenue.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before other non-operating adjustments, interest income and expense, income 
taxes,  depreciation,  amortization  of  intangible  assets,  restructuring  and  other  charges,  impairment  of  long-lived  assets, 
acquisition,  financing  and  other  third  party  costs,  fair  value  adjustments  from  purchase  accounting,  litigation  and  settlement 
income  and  expense,  COVID  related  expenses,  and  stock-based  and  other  non-cash  compensation  expense.  We  use  adjusted 
EBITDA as an important indicator of the operating performance of our business. We use adjusted EBITDA in internal forecasts 
and  models  when  establishing  internal  operating  budgets,  supplementing  the  financial  results  and  forecasts  reported  to  our 
board  of  directors,  determining  a  portion  of  bonus  compensation  for  executive  officers  and  other  key  employees  based  on 
operating  performance,  evaluating  short-term  and  long-term  operating  trends  in  our  operations  and  allocating  resources  to 
various  initiatives  and  operational  requirements.  We  believe  that  adjusted  EBITDA  permits  a  comparative  assessment  of  our 
operating performance, relative to our performance based on our GAAP results, while isolating the effects of charges that may 
vary  from  period  to  period  without  any  correlation  to  underlying  operating  performance.  We  believe  that  these  non-GAAP 
financial adjustments are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and 
information  used  by  management  in  our  financial  and  operational  decision-making.  We  believe  that  trends  in  our  adjusted 
EBITDA are valuable indicators of our operating performance.

Adjusted  EBITDA  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure  and  should  not  be  considered  in  isolation  or  as  a  substitute  for 
financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same 
manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We expect to continue to incur expenses similar to the adjusted 
EBITDA  financial  adjustments  described  above,  and  investors  should  not  infer  from  our  presentation  of  this  non-GAAP 
financial measure that these costs are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring.

40

The  following  table  reconciles  our  net  (loss)  income,  the  most  directly  comparable  GAAP  financial  measure,  to  our 

adjusted EBITDA: 

(In thousands)
Net (loss) income

Other non-operating adjustments, net

Interest expense, net

Income tax (benefit) provision

Depreciation

Amortization of intangible assets
Restructuring and other charges(1)
Impairment of long-lived assets
Acquisition, financing and other third party costs(2)
Fair value adjustments from purchase accounting

Litigation and settlement expense, net

COVID related expenses
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense(3)

For the Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

(28,335)  $ 

11,275  $ 

62,044 

(1,589) 

24,106 

(20,207) 

43,777 

53,552 

6,981 

— 

10,019 

356 

495 

67 
43,031 

2,932 

5,663 

7,120 

33,150 

60,267 

27,445 

— 

13,608 

(2,009) 

1,908 

689 
38,459 

(724) 

1,043 

15,129 

25,912 

41,171 

9,222 

— 

8,600 

(290) 

622 

9,943 
29,224 

Adjusted EBITDA

$ 

132,253  $ 

200,507  $ 

201,896 

(1) Restructuring  and  other  charges  for  fiscal  2023  are  related  to  management's  decision  to  undertake  certain  actions  to  realign  operating  expenses  through
workforce reductions and the closure of certain facilities, businesses and product lines. These charges are typically related to acquisitions and organizational 
redesign  programs  initiated  as  part  of  discrete  post-acquisition  integration  activities.  We  believe  these  items  are  non-routine  and  may  not  be  indicative  of
ongoing operating results.
(2) Acquisition, financing and other third party costs for fiscal 2023 are related to third party advisory fees in connection with engagements by activist investors 
and costs associated with the Board's review of strategic alternatives. 
(3) Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2023, the Company increased the rate of its matching contributions from 3% to 6% of participants' eligible annual
compensation and changed the form of these contributions from cash to company stock. Fiscal 2023 also includes forfeitures of $6.8 million of stock-based
compensation from the Company's former CEO's resignation.

Adjusted  income  and  adjusted  EPS  exclude  the  impact  of  certain  items  and,  therefore,  have  not  been  calculated  in 
accordance with GAAP. We believe that exclusion of these items assists in providing a more complete understanding of our 
underlying  results  and  trends  and  allows  for  comparability  with  our  peer  company  index  and  industry.  These  non-GAAP 
financial  measures  may  not  be  computed  in  the  same  manner  as  similarly  titled  measures  used  by  other  companies.  We  use 
these  measures  along  with  the  corresponding  GAAP  financial  measures  to  manage  our  business  and  to  evaluate  our 
performance  compared  to  prior  periods  and  the  marketplace.  We  define  adjusted  income  as  net  income  before  other  non-
operating  adjustments,  amortization  of  intangible  assets,  restructuring  and  other  charges,  impairment  of  long-lived  assets, 
acquisition,  financing  and  other  third  party  costs,  fair  value  adjustments  from  purchase  accounting,  litigation  and  settlement 
income  and  expense,  COVID  related  expenses,  and  stock-based  and  other  non-cash  compensation  expense.  The  impact  to 
income  taxes  includes  the  impact  to  the  effective  tax  rate,  current  tax  provision  and  deferred  tax  provision.  Adjusted  EPS 
expresses adjusted income on a per share basis using weighted average diluted shares outstanding. 

Adjusted income and adjusted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered in isolation or as a 
substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. We expect to continue to incur expenses similar to the 
adjusted income and adjusted EPS financial adjustments described above, and investors should not infer from our presentation 
of these non-GAAP financial measures that these costs are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring.

41

The  following  table  reconciles  net  (loss)  income  and  diluted  (loss)  earnings  per  share,  the  most  directly  comparable 

GAAP financial measures, to adjusted income and adjusted EPS: 

(In thousands, except per share data)

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

Net (loss) income and diluted (loss) earnings per share

$ (28,335)  $  (0.50)  $  11,275  $  0.20  $  62,044  $  1.12 

For the Fiscal Years Ended

   Other non-operating adjustments, net

   Amortization of intangible assets
   Restructuring and other charges(1)
   Impairment of long-lived assets
   Acquisition, financing and other third party costs(2)
   Fair value adjustments from purchase accounting

   Litigation and settlement expense, net

   COVID related expenses
   Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense(3)
   Impact to income taxes(4)
Adjusted income and adjusted earnings per share

(1,589) 

53,552 

6,981 

— 

10,019 

356 

495 

67 

  43,031 

(27,776) 

2,932 

60,267 

27,445 

— 

13,608 

(2,009) 

1,908 

689 

38,459 

(32,309) 

(724) 

41,171 

9,222 

— 

8,600 

(290) 

622 

9,943 

29,224 

(25,697) 

$  56,801  $  1.00  $ 122,265  $  2.19  $ 134,115  $  2.42 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

56,874 

55,901 

55,474 

(1) Restructuring  and  other  charges  for  fiscal  2023  are  related  to  management's  decision  to  undertake  certain  actions  to  realign  operating  expenses  through
workforce reductions and the closure of certain facilities, businesses and product lines. These charges are typically related to acquisitions and organizational 
redesign  programs  initiated  as  part  of  discrete  post-acquisition  integration  activities.  We  believe  these  items  are  non-routine  and  may  not  be  indicative  of
ongoing operating results.
(2) Acquisition, financing and other third party costs for fiscal 2023 are related to third party advisory fees in connection with engagements by activist investors 
and costs associated with the Board of Directors' review of strategic alternatives.
(3) Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2023, the Company increased the rate of its matching contributions from 3% to 6% of participants' eligible annual
compensation and changed the form of these contributions from cash to company stock. Fiscal 2023 also includes forfeitures of $6.8 million of stock-based
compensation from the Company's former CEO's resignation.
(4) Impact  to  income  taxes  is  calculated  by  recasting  income  before  income  taxes  to  include  the  add-backs  involved  in  determining  adjusted  income  and
recalculating the income tax provision using this adjusted income from operations before income taxes. The impact to income taxes includes the impact to the 
effective tax rate, current tax provision and deferred tax provision.

Free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure for reporting cash flow, is defined as cash provided by operating activities less 
capital expenditures for property and equipment, which includes capitalized software development costs. We believe free cash 
flow provides investors with an important perspective on cash available for investments and acquisitions after making capital 
investments required to support ongoing business operations and long-term value creation. We believe that trends in our free 
cash flow can be valuable indicators of our operating performance and liquidity.

Free  cash  flow  is  a  non-GAAP  financial  measure  and  should  not  be  considered  in  isolation  or  as  a  substitute  for 
financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same 
manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. We expect to continue to incur expenditures similar to the free 
cash  flow  adjustment  described  above,  and  investors  should  not  infer  from  our  presentation  of  this  non-GAAP  financial 
measure that these expenditures reflect all of our obligations which require cash.

The  following  table  reconciles  cash  (used  in)  provided  by  operating  activities,  the  most  directly  comparable  GAAP 

financial measure, to free cash flow:

(In thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

Purchase of property and equipment

Free cash flow

For the Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

$ 

(21,254)  $ 

(18,869)  $ 

97,247 

(38,796) 

(27,656) 

(45,599) 

(60,050)  $ 

(46,525)  $ 

51,648 

42

Organic revenue and acquired revenue are non-GAAP measures for reporting financial performance of our business. We 
believe  this  information  provides  investors  with  insight  as  to  our  ongoing  business  performance.  Organic  revenue  represents 
total  company  revenue  excluding  net  revenue  from  acquired  companies  for  the  first  four  full  quarters  since  the  entities’ 
acquisition  date  (which  excludes  intercompany  transactions).  Acquired  revenue  represents  revenue  from  acquired  companies 
for  the  first  four  full  quarters  since  the  entities'  acquisition  date  (which  excludes  intercompany  transactions).  After  the 
completion of four full fiscal quarters, acquired revenue is treated as organic for current and comparable historical periods.

The  following  table  reconciles  the  most  directly  comparable  GAAP  financial  measure  to  the  non-GAAP  financial 

measure:

(In thousands)
Organic revenue
Acquired revenue(1)
Total revenues

Fiscal 2023

$  948,814 

25,068 

As a % of
Total Net
Revenue

Fiscal 2022

As a % of
Total Net
Revenue

$ Change

% Change

 97 % $  982,153 

 99 % $  (33,339) 

 3 %

6,044 

 1 %

19,024 

$  973,882 

 100 % $  988,197 

 100 % $  (14,315) 

 (3) %

 100 %

 (1) %

(1) Acquired revenue for all preceding periods presented has been recast for comparative purposes.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES

We have identified the policies discussed below as critical to understanding our business and our results of operations. 
The  impact  and  any  associated  risks  related  to  these  policies  on  our  business  operations  are  discussed  throughout 
Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations  where  such  policies  affect  our 
reported and expected financial results. We believe the following critical accounting policies to be those most important to the 
portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and those that require the most subjective judgment.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

We recognize revenue at a point in time or over time as the performance obligations are met. A performance obligation is 
a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. Contracts with distinct performance obligations 
recognized at a point in time, with or without an allocation of the transaction price, totaled 44% and 45% of revenues for the 
fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. Total revenue recognized under contracts over time was 56% 
and 55% of revenues for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. 

Revenue recognized at a point in time generally relates to contracts that include a combination of components, modules 
and sub-assemblies, integrated subsystems and related system integration or other services. Revenue is recognized at a point in 
time for these products and services (versus over time recognition) due to the following: (i) customers are only able to consume 
the benefits provided by us upon completion of the product or service; (ii) customers do not control the product or service prior 
to  completion;  and  (iii)  we  do  not  have  an  enforceable  right  to  payment  at  all  times  for  performance  completed  to  date. 
Accordingly, there is little judgment in determining when control of the good or service transfers to the customer, and revenue 
is recognized upon shipment (for goods) or completion (for services).

For  contracts  with  multiple  performance  obligations,  the  transaction  price  is  allocated  to  each  performance  obligation 
using the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. Standalone selling prices of our goods and 
services are generally not directly observable. Accordingly, the primary method used to estimate standalone selling price is the 
expected cost plus a margin approach, under which we forecast the expected costs of satisfying a performance obligation and 
then add an appropriate margin for that distinct good or service. The objective of the expected cost plus a margin approach is to 
determine  the  price  at  which  we  would  transact  if  the  product  or  service  were  sold  by  us  on  a  standalone  basis.  Our 
determination of the expected cost plus a margin approach involves the consideration of several factors based on the specific 
facts and circumstances of each contract. Specifically, we consider the cost to produce the deliverable, the anticipated margin 
on that deliverable, the selling price and profit margin for similar parts, our ongoing pricing strategy and policies, often based 
on the price list established and updated by management on a regular basis, the value of any enhancements that have been built 
into the deliverable and the characteristics of the varying markets in which the deliverable is sold.

Revenue is recognized over time (versus point in time recognition) for long-term contracts with development, production 
and service activities where the performance obligations are satisfied over time. These over time contracts involve the design, 
development,  manufacture,  or  modification  of  complex  modules  and  sub-assemblies  or  integrated  subsystems  and  related 
services. Revenue is recognized over time, given: (i) our performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as 
the  asset  is  created  or  enhanced;  or  (ii)  our  performance  creates  an  asset  with  no  alternative  use  to  us  and  (iii)  we  have  an 
enforceable  right  to  payment  for  performance  completed  to  date.  We  consider  the  nature  of  these  contracts  and  the  types  of 
products and services provided when determining the proper accounting for a particular contract. These contracts include both 

43

fixed-price and cost reimbursable contracts. Our cost reimbursable contracts typically include cost-plus fixed fee and time and 
material (“T&M”) contracts. We consider whether contracts should be combined or segmented, and based on this assessment, 
we  combine  closely  related  contracts  when  all  the  applicable  criteria  are  met.  The  combination  of  two  or  more  contracts 
requires judgment in determining whether the intent of entering into the contracts was effectively to enter into a single contract, 
which should be combined to reflect an overall profit rate. Similarly, we may separate an arrangement, which may consist of a 
single contract or group of contracts, with varying rates of profitability, only if the applicable criteria are met. Judgment also is 
involved in determining whether a single contract or group of contracts may be segmented based on how the arrangement and 
the  related  performance  criteria  were  negotiated.  The  decision  to  combine  a  group  of  contracts  or  segment  a  contract  could 
change the amount of revenue and gross profit recorded in a given period. For all types of contracts, we recognize anticipated 
contract losses as soon as they become known and estimable. These losses are recognized in advance of contract performance 
and  as  of  June  30,  2023,  approximately  $6.0  million  of  these  costs  were  in  Accrued  expenses  on  our  Consolidated  Balance 
Sheet. 

For over time contracts, we typically leverage the input method, using a cost-to-cost measure of progress. We believe that 
this  method  represents  the  most  faithful  depiction  of  our  performance  because  it  directly  measures  value  transferred  to  the 
customer.  Contract  estimates  and  estimates  of  any  variable  consideration  are  based  on  various  assumptions  to  project  the 
outcome of future events that may span several years. These assumptions include: the amount of time to complete the contract, 
including the assessment of the nature and complexity of the work to be performed; the cost and availability of materials; the 
availability of subcontractor services and materials; and the availability and timing of funding from the customer. We bear the 
risk of changes in estimates to complete on a fixed-price contract which may cause profit levels to vary from period to period. 
For cost reimbursable contracts, we are reimbursed periodically for allowable costs and are paid a portion of the fee based on 
contract progress. In the limited instances where we enter into T&M contracts, revenue recognized reflects the number of direct 
labor hours expended in the performance of a contract multiplied by the contract billing rate, as well as reimbursement of other 
direct  billable  costs.  For  T&M  contracts,  we  elected  to  use  a  practical  expedient  permitted  by  ASC  606  whereby  revenue  is 
recognized in the amount for which we have a right to invoice the customer based on the control transferred to the customer. 
For over time contracts, we recognize anticipated contract losses as soon as they become known and estimable.

Accounting for contracts recognized over time requires significant judgment relative to estimating total contract revenues 
and costs, in particular, assumptions relative to the amount of time to complete the contract, including the assessment of the 
nature and complexity of the work to be performed. Our estimates are based upon the professional knowledge and experience of 
our  engineers,  program  managers  and  other  personnel,  who  review  each  over  time  contract  monthly  to  assess  the  contract’s 
schedule, performance, technical matters and estimated cost at completion. Changes in estimates are applied retrospectively and 
when adjustments in estimated contract costs are identified, such revisions may result in current period adjustments to earnings 
applicable to performance in prior periods. 

We generally do not provide our customers with rights of product return other than those related to assurance warranty 
provisions that permit repair or replacement of defective goods over a period of 12 to 36 months. We accrue for anticipated 
warranty  costs  upon  product  shipment.  We  do  not  consider  activities  related  to  such  assurance  warranties,  if  any,  to  be  a 
separate performance obligation. We offer separately priced extended warranties which generally range from 12 to 36 months 
that are treated as separate performance obligations. The transaction price allocated to extended warranties is recognized over 
time in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in satisfying the obligations under the contract. 

On  over  time  contracts,  the  portion  of  the  payments  retained  by  the  customer  is  not  considered  a  significant  financing 
component because most contracts have a duration of less than one year and payment is received as progress is made. Many of 
our over time contracts have milestone payments, which align the payment schedule with the progress towards completion on 
the performance obligation. On some contracts, we may be entitled to receive an advance payment, which is not considered a 
significant financing component because it is used to facilitate inventory demands at the onset of a contract and to safeguard us 
from the failure of the other party to abide by some or all of their obligations under the contract.

We define service revenues as revenue from activities that are not associated with the design, development, production, 
or delivery of tangible assets, software or specific capabilities sold by us. Examples of our service revenues include: analyst 
services and systems engineering support, consulting, maintenance and other support, testing and installation. We combine our 
product and service revenues into a single class as services revenues are less than 10 percent of total revenues.

INVENTORY VALUATION

We value our inventory at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or its net realizable value. We write down inventory for 
excess  and  obsolescence  based  upon  assumptions  about  future  demand,  product  mix  and  possible  alternative  uses.  Actual 
demand, product mix and alternative usage may be higher or lower resulting in variations in on our gross margin. 

44

GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS

We  evaluate  our  goodwill  for  impairment  annually  in  the  fourth  quarter  and  in  any  interim  period  in  which  events  or 
circumstances  arise  that  indicate  our  goodwill  may  be  impaired.  Indicators  of  impairment  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  a 
significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, a decline in our market capitalization, the loss of significant business, 
significant decreases in funding for our contracts, or other significant adverse changes in industry or market conditions. 

We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. Goodwill impairment guidance provides entities an option to 
perform  a  qualitative  assessment  (commonly  known  as  “step  zero”)  to  determine  whether  further  impairment  testing  is 
necessary before performing the two-step test. The qualitative assessment requires significant judgments by management about 
macro-economic  conditions  including  our  operating  environment,  industry  and  other  market  considerations,  entity-specific 
events related to financial performance or loss of key personnel, and other events that could impact the reporting unit. If we 
conclude that further testing is required, the impairment test involves a two-step process. Step one compares the fair value of 
the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, 
step  two  is  required  to  determine  if  there  is  an  impairment  of  the  goodwill.  Step  two  compares  the  implied  fair  value  of  the 
reporting  unit's  goodwill  to  the  carrying  amount  of  the  goodwill.  We  estimate  the  fair  value  of  our  reporting  units  using  the 
income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and 
estimates including future revenues, expenses, capital expenditures, and working capital, as well as discount factors and income 
tax  rates.  In  addition,  we  use  the  market  approach,  which  compares  the  reporting  unit  to  publicly-traded  companies  and 
transactions involving similar businesses, to support the conclusions of the income approach.

During  the  first  quarter  of  fiscal  2021,  the  Company  reorganized  its  internal  reporting  unit  structure  to  align  with  the 
Company's market and brand strategy as well as promote scale as the organization continues to grow. The Company evaluated 
this  reorganization  under  ASC  280  to  determine  whether  this  change  has  impacted  the  Company's  single  operating  and 
reportable segment. The Company concluded this change had no effect given the CODM continues to evaluate and manage the 
Company  on  the  basis  of  one  operating  and  reportable  segment.  The  Company  utilized  the  management  approach  for 
determining its operating segment in accordance with ASC 280. There has been no changes to the Company's conclusion of one  
operating and reportable segment in fiscal 2023.

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), the Company determines its reporting 
units based upon whether discrete financial information is available, if management regularly reviews the operating results of 
the component, the nature of the products offered to customers and the market characteristics of each reporting unit. A reporting 
unit is considered to be an operating segment or one level below an operating segment also known as a component. Component 
level  financial  information  is  reviewed  by  management  across  two  divisions:  Microelectronics,  and  Mission  Systems. 
Accordingly, these were determined to be the Company's reporting units. 

As part of our annual goodwill impairment testing, we utilized a discount rate for each of our reporting units, as defined 
by  ASC  350,  that  we  believe  represents  the  risks  that  our  businesses  face,  considering  their  sizes,  the  current  economic 
environment, and other industry data we believe is appropriate. The discount rates for Microelectronics and Mission Systems 
were 11.25%, and 12.0%, respectively. The annual testing indicated that the fair values of our Microelectronics and Mission 
Systems reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and thus no further testing was required. 

We also review finite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets when indications of potential impairment exist, such as 
a significant reduction in undiscounted cash flows associated with the assets. Should the fair value of our finite-lived intangible 
assets  or  long-lived  assets  decline  because  of  reduced  operating  performance,  market  declines,  or  other  indicators  of 
impairment, a charge to operations for impairment may be necessary. 

INCOME TAXES

The determination of income tax expense requires us to make certain estimates and judgments concerning the calculation 
of  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities,  as  well  as  the  deductions  and  credits  that  are  available  to  reduce  taxable  income.  We 
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our 
consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference 
between  the  financial  statement  and  tax  basis  of  assets  and  liabilities  using  enacted  tax  rates  for  the  year  in  which  the 
differences are expected to reverse.

In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including 
our past operating results, our forecast of future earnings, future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The assumptions 
utilized in determining future taxable income require significant judgment. We record a valuation allowance against deferred 
tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be 
realized. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used for which a reserve has been provided, we reverse the 
related valuation allowance. If our actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction differs from estimates, additional allowances 
or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

45

We use a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. First, the tax position must be evaluated to 
determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed more-likely-than-not 
to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The 
amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon 
ultimate settlement. We reevaluate our uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and any changes to these positions as a result 
of tax audits, tax laws or other facts and circumstances could result in additional charges to operations.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

We  utilize  the  acquisition  method  of  accounting  for  business  combinations  and  allocate  the  purchase  price  of  an 
acquisition to the various tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. 
We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach 
requires  the  use  of  many  assumptions  and  estimates  including  future  revenues  and  expenses,  as  well  as  discount  factors  and 
income tax rates. Other estimates include:

•

•

•

estimated step-ups for the over time contracts fixed assets, leasehold interests and inventory;

estimated fair values of intangible assets; and

estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the acquiree.

While  we  use  our  best  estimates  and  assumptions  as  part  of  the  purchase  price  allocation  process  to  accurately  value
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business acquisition date, our estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain 
and  subject  to  refinement.  As  a  result,  during  the  purchase  price  allocation  period,  which  is  generally  one  year  from  the 
business acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to 
goodwill. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets between preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the related 
amortization  is  adjusted  in  the  period  it  occurs.  Subsequent  to  the  purchase  price  allocation  period  any  adjustment  to  assets 
acquired or liabilities assumed is included in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is determined. 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note B to consolidated financial statements (under the caption “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements”).

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note B to consolidated financial statements (under the caption “Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements”).

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

INTEREST RATE RISK

Our exposure to interest rate risk is related primarily to our investment portfolio and the Revolver. 

Our  investment  portfolio  includes  money  market  funds  from  high  quality  U.S.  government  issuers.  A  change  in 
prevailing interest rates may cause the fair value of our investments to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was 
issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing rate rises, the fair value of the principal amount of 
our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, investments are generally available for sale and we generally limit 
the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

We also are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. For our variable 
rate borrowings, we may use a fixed interest rate swap, effectively converting a portion of variable rate borrowings to fixed rate 
borrowings in order to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes on earnings. We utilize interest rate derivatives to mitigate 
interest rate exposure with respect to our financing arrangements. There were $511.5 million of outstanding borrowings against 
the Revolver at June 30, 2023. 

CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Financial  instruments  that  potentially  expose  the  Company  to  concentrations  of  credit  risk  consist  principally  of  cash, 
cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We place our cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with high credit 
quality.  As  of  June  30,  2023  and  July  1,  2022,  we  had  $71.6  million  and  $65.7  million,  respectively,  of  cash  and  cash 
equivalents on deposit or invested with our financial and lending institutions.

We  provide  credit  to  customers  in  the  normal  course  of  business.  We  perform  ongoing  credit  evaluations  of  our 
customers’  financial  condition  and  limit  the  amount  of  credit  extended  when  deemed  necessary.  As  of  June  30,  2023,  five 
customers accounted for 48% of our receivables, unbilled receivables and costs in excess of billings. As of July 1, 2022, five 
customers accounted for 45% of our receivables, unbilled receivables and costs in excess of billings.

46

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

We operate primarily in the United States; however, we conduct business outside the United States through our foreign 
subsidiaries  in  Switzerland,  the  United  Kingdom,  Spain,  and  Canada  where  business  is  largely  transacted  in  non-U.S.  dollar 
currencies. Accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in the exchange rates of local currencies. Local 
currencies are used as the functional currency for our non-U.S. subsidiaries. Consequently, changes in the exchange rates of the 
currencies may impact the translation of the foreign subsidiaries’ statements of operations into U.S. dollars, which may in turn 
affect our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

We have not entered into any financial derivative instruments that expose us to material market risk, including any 

instruments designed to hedge the impact of foreign currency exposures. We may, however, hedge such exposure to foreign 
currency exchange rate fluctuations in the future.

47

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Mercury Systems, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Mercury  Systems,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  (the 
Company) as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, 
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2023, and the related 
notes  and  financial  statement  schedule  II  (collectively,  the  consolidated  financial  statements).  We  also  have  audited  the 
Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  June  30,  2023,  based  on  criteria  established  in  Internal  Control  – 
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 
position of the Company as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the 
fiscal  years  in  the  three-year  period  ended  June  30,  2023,  in  conformity  with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles. 
Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 
June  30,  2023  based  on  criteria  established  in  Internal  Control  –  Integrated  Framework  (2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of 
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Basis for Opinions 

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal 
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included 
in  the  accompanying  Management's  Annual  Report  on  Internal  Control  over  Financial  Reporting.  Our  responsibility  is  to 
express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over 
financial  reporting  based  on  our  audits.  We  are  a  public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  Public  Company  Accounting 
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with 
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the 
PCAOB.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  PCAOB.  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and 
perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  consolidated  financial  statements  are  free  of  material 
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in 
all material respects.

Our  audits  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material 
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to 
those  risks.  Such  procedures  included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  regarding  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the 
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates 
made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  presentation  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  Our  audit  of 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  included  obtaining  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting, 
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal 
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the 
circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the 
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally 
accepted  accounting  principles.  A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  includes  those  policies  and  procedures 
that  (1)  pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and 
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit 
preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  that  receipts  and 
expenditures  of  the  company  are  being  made  only  in  accordance  with  authorizations  of  management  and  directors  of  the 
company;  and  (3)  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  prevention  or  timely  detection  of  unauthorized  acquisition,  use,  or 
disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, 
projections  of  any  evaluation  of  effectiveness  to  future  periods  are  subject  to  the  risk  that  controls  may  become  inadequate 
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

48

Critical Audit Matter

The  critical  audit  matter  communicated  below  is  a  matter  arising  from  the  current  period  audit  of  the  consolidated 
financial  statements  that  was  communicated  or  required  to  be  communicated  to  the  audit  committee  and  that:  (1)  relates  to 
accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, 
subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the 
consolidated  financial  statements,  taken  as  a  whole,  and  we  are  not,  by  communicating  the  critical  audit  matter  below, 
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Estimate of total contract costs to be incurred for certain fixed price contract revenue recognized over time

As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, revenue recognized over time for the year ended June 30, 

2023 represented 56% of total revenues. For contracts where revenue is recognized over time under fixed price arrangements, 
the Company recognizes revenue based on the ratio of (1) actual contract costs incurred to date to (2) the Company’s estimate 
of total contract costs to be incurred.

We identified the evaluation of total contract costs to be incurred for certain fixed price contract revenue recognized over 
time  as  a  critical  audit  matter  given  the  complex  nature  of  the  Company’s  products  sold  under  such  contracts.  In  particular, 
evaluating the Company’s judgments regarding the amount of time to complete the contracts, including the assessment of the 
nature and complexity of the work to be performed, involved a high degree of subjective auditor judgment.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and 
tested  the  operating  effectiveness  of  certain  internal  controls  related  to  the  Company’s  process  to  develop  estimates  of  total 
contract  costs  to  be  incurred  for  partially  completed  performance  obligations.  This  included  controls  related  to  the  estimated 
amount of time to complete the contracts, including the assessment of the nature and complexity of the work to be performed. 
We  considered  factors,  including  the  value  and  stage  of  completion,  to  select  certain  customers’  contracts  to  evaluate  the 
Company’s assumptions underlying the estimate of total contract costs to be incurred. We inspected the selected contracts to 
evaluate the Company’s identification of performance obligations and the determined method for measuring contract progress. 
We compared the Company’s original or prior period estimate of total contract costs to be incurred to the actual costs incurred 
for completed contracts to assess the Company’s ability to accurately estimate costs. We inquired of operational personnel of 
the Company to evaluate progress to date, the estimate of remaining costs to be incurred, and factors impacting the amount of 
time  and  cost  to  complete  the  selected  contracts,  including  the  assessment  of  the  nature  and  complexity  of  the  work  to  be 
performed. We inspected correspondence, if any, between the Company and the customers for the selected contracts as part of 
our evaluation of contract progress.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

August 15, 2023

49

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 

Assets
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,335 and $2,074 at June 30, 
2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively
Unbilled receivables and costs in excess of billings
Inventory
Prepaid income taxes
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Total current assets
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net
Deferred tax asset

Other non-current assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:

Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Accrued compensation
Income tax payable
Deferred revenues and customer advances

Total current liabilities

Deferred income taxes
Income taxes payable
Long-term debt
Operating lease liabilities
Other non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (Note L)
Shareholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or 
outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 85,000,000 shares authorized; 56,961,665 and 
55,679,747 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, 
respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income

Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

71,563  $ 

65,654 

124,729 
382,558 
337,216 
— 
20,952 
937,018 
119,554 
938,093 
298,051 
63,015 

27,099 

144,494 
303,356 
270,339 
7,503 
23,906 
815,252 
127,191 
937,880 
351,538 
66,366 

— 

$ 

$ 

8,537 
2,391,367  $ 

6,188 
2,304,415 

103,986  $ 
28,423 
30,419 
13,874 
56,562 
233,264 
— 
5,166 
511,500 
66,797 
7,955 
824,682 

98,673 
34,954 
44,813 
— 
15,487 
193,927 
32,398 
9,112 
451,500 
69,888 
10,405 
767,230 

— 

— 

570 
1,196,847 
357,439 
11,829 
1,566,685 
2,391,367  $ 

557 
1,145,323 
385,774 
5,531 
1,537,185 
2,304,415 

$ 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

50

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data) 

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

Net revenues
Cost of revenues

Gross margin

Operating expenses:

Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Amortization of intangible assets
Restructuring and other charges
Acquisition costs and other related expenses

Total operating expenses

(Loss) income from operations
Interest income
Interest expense
Other expense, net
(Loss) income before income taxes
Income tax (benefit) provision
Net (loss) income

Basic net (loss) earnings per share
Diluted net (loss) earnings per share

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net (loss) income
Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Pension benefit plan, net of tax
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
Total comprehensive (loss) income

For the Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

973,882  $ 
657,154 
316,728 

988,197  $ 
593,241 
394,956 

923,996 
538,808 
385,188 

160,637 
108,799 
53,552 
6,981 
8,444 
338,413 
(21,685) 
1,053 
(25,159) 
(2,751) 
(48,542) 
(20,207) 
(28,335)  $ 

157,044 
107,169 
60,267 
27,445 
11,421 
363,346 
31,610 
143 
(5,806) 
(7,552) 
18,395 
7,120 
11,275  $ 

134,337 
113,481 
41,171 
9,222 
5,976 
304,187 
81,001 
179 
(1,222) 
(2,785) 
77,173 
15,129 
62,044 

(0.50)  $ 
(0.50)  $ 

0.20  $ 
0.20  $ 

1.13 
1.12 

56,554 
56,554 

55,527 
55,901 

55,070 
55,474 

(28,335)  $ 
5,856 
300 
142 
6,298 
(22,037)  $ 

11,275  $ 
— 
1,131 
4,739 
5,870 
17,145  $ 

62,044 
— 
(739) 
3,285 
2,546 
64,590 

$ 

$ 
$ 

$ 

$ 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

51

(cid:34)(cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:24)(cid:42)(cid:39)(cid:46)(cid:1)(cid:40)(cid:46)(cid:40)(cid:41)(cid:26)(cid:34)(cid:40)(cid:8)(cid:1)(cid:30)(cid:35)(cid:24)(cid:10)

(cid:24)(cid:36)(cid:35)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:33)(cid:30)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:41)(cid:26)(cid:25)(cid:1)(cid:40)(cid:41)(cid:22)(cid:41)(cid:26)(cid:34)(cid:26)(cid:35)(cid:41)(cid:40)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:27)(cid:1)(cid:40)(cid:29)(cid:22)(cid:39)(cid:26)(cid:29)(cid:36)(cid:33)(cid:25)(cid:26)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:26)(cid:38)(cid:42)(cid:30)(cid:41)(cid:46)
(cid:32)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:32)(cid:62)(cid:72)(cid:56)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:1)(cid:51)(cid:58)(cid:54)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:16)
(cid:7)(cid:35)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:72)(cid:8)

(cid:28)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:15)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:72)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:69)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:56)(cid:61)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)

(cid:44)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)

(cid:45)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:12)(cid:55)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:68)(cid:67)

(cid:40)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:58)

(cid:41)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:58)

(cid:28)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:16)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:72)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:69)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:56)(cid:61)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)

(cid:44)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)

(cid:45)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:12)(cid:55)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:68)(cid:67)

(cid:40)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:58)

(cid:41)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:58)

(cid:28)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:65)(cid:78)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:17)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:72)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)
(cid:69)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:56)(cid:61)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)
(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:1)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:57)(cid:58)(cid:59)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:71)(cid:62)(cid:55)(cid:74)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)
(cid:69)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)

(cid:44)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:66)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)

(cid:45)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:56)(cid:64)(cid:12)(cid:55)(cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:62)(cid:68)(cid:67)

(cid:40)(cid:58)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:65)(cid:68)(cid:72)(cid:72)

(cid:41)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:62)(cid:75)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:58)

(cid:28)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:67)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:18)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:24)(cid:64)(cid:62)(cid:62)(cid:64)(cid:63)(cid:1)(cid:40)(cid:69)(cid:64)(cid:52)(cid:60)

(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:50)(cid:67)(cid:54)(cid:68)

(cid:22)(cid:62)(cid:64)(cid:70)(cid:63)(cid:69)

(cid:22)(cid:53)(cid:53)(cid:58)(cid:69)(cid:58)(cid:64)(cid:63)(cid:50)(cid:61)
(cid:37)(cid:50)(cid:58)(cid:53)(cid:9)(cid:58)(cid:63)
(cid:24)(cid:50)(cid:65)(cid:58)(cid:69)(cid:50)(cid:61)

(cid:39)(cid:54)(cid:69)(cid:50)(cid:58)(cid:63)(cid:54)(cid:53)
(cid:26)(cid:50)(cid:67)(cid:63)(cid:58)(cid:63)(cid:56)(cid:68)

(cid:22)(cid:52)(cid:52)(cid:70)(cid:62)(cid:70)(cid:61)(cid:50)(cid:69)(cid:54)(cid:53)
(cid:36)(cid:69)(cid:57)(cid:54)(cid:67)
(cid:24)(cid:64)(cid:62)(cid:65)(cid:67)(cid:54)(cid:57)(cid:54)(cid:63)(cid:68)(cid:58)(cid:71)(cid:54)
(cid:6)(cid:33)(cid:64)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:30)(cid:63)(cid:52)(cid:64)(cid:62)(cid:54)

(cid:41)(cid:64)(cid:69)(cid:50)(cid:61)
(cid:40)(cid:57)(cid:50)(cid:67)(cid:54)(cid:57)(cid:64)(cid:61)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:68)(cid:78)
(cid:26)(cid:66)(cid:70)(cid:58)(cid:69)(cid:74)

(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1) (cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:16)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1) (cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:24)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:16)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:15)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:17)(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:1)

(cid:22)(cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:1)

(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:16)(cid:15)(cid:24)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:19)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:21)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:22)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:18)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:22)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:8)(cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:24)(cid:8)(cid:1) (cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:11)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:21)(cid:8)(cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:22)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:11)(cid:16)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:17)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:21)(cid:18)(cid:8)(cid:1)

(cid:17)(cid:22)(cid:11)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:1)

(cid:7)(cid:17)(cid:23)(cid:11)(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:8)(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:15)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1) (cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:16)(cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:11)(cid:19)(cid:18)(cid:24)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1)

(cid:16)(cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:23)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:1) (cid:3)(cid:1) (cid:16)(cid:11)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:1)

(cid:86)(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:21)(cid:11)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:1)

(cid:46)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:56)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:66)(cid:69)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:78)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:60)(cid:1)(cid:67)(cid:68)(cid:73)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:71)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:1)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:58)(cid:60)(cid:71)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:1)(cid:69)(cid:54)(cid:71)(cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:68)(cid:59)(cid:1)(cid:73)(cid:61)(cid:58)(cid:1)(cid:56)(cid:68)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:65)(cid:62)(cid:57)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:58)(cid:57)(cid:1)(cid:59)(cid:62)(cid:67)(cid:54)(cid:67)(cid:56)(cid:62)(cid:54)(cid:65)(cid:1)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:54)(cid:73)(cid:58)(cid:66)(cid:58)(cid:67)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:13)

(cid:20)(cid:17)

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net (loss) income

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense

Stock-based compensation expense

Share-based matching contributions on defined contribution plan

Benefit for deferred income taxes

Other non-cash items

Cash settlement for termination of interest rate swap

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of businesses acquired:

Accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, and costs in excess of billings

Inventory

Prepaid income taxes

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Other non-current assets
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation

Deferred revenues and customer advances

Income taxes payable

Other non-current liabilities

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired

Purchases of property and equipment

Other investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from employee stock plans

Borrowings under credit facilities

Payments under credit facilities

Payments for retirement of common stock

Payments of deferred financing and offering costs

Net cash provided by financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

Income taxes

Supplemental disclosures—non-cash activities:

Non-cash investing activity: Purchases of property and equipment incurred but not yet paid

For the Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

(28,335)  $ 

11,275  $ 

62,044 

97,329 

27,753 

15,665 

(59,647) 

(746)

5,995 

(58,718) 

(64,061) 

7,433 

2,942 

3,769 
(16,732) 

40,701 

9,907 

(4,509) 

(21,254) 

— 

(38,796) 

235 

93,417 

38,293 

— 

(2,419) 

(497)

— 

(146,477) 

(40,902) 

(4,977) 

(4,396) 

6,117 
58,395 

(18,998) 

1,009 

(8,709) 

(18,869) 

(243,464) 

(27,656) 

(3,200) 

67,083 

28,290 

— 

(1,125) 

3,745 

— 

(51,981) 

(27,441) 

1,703 

1,718 

5,459 
(6,315) 

13,731 

4,080 

(3,744) 

97,247 

(372,826) 

(45,599) 

1,538 

(38,561) 

(274,320) 

(416,887) 

5,492 

140,000 

(80,000) 

(63)

— 

65,429 

295 

5,909 

65,654 

5,371 

251,500 

— 

(8,206)

(2,911) 

245,754 

(750)

(48,185) 

113,839 

71,563  $ 

65,654  $ 

6,295 

200,000 

— 

(66) 

— 

206,229 

412

(112,999) 

226,838 

113,839 

27,288  $ 

24,243  $ 

5,492  $ 

14,121  $ 

1,088 

8,983 

6,475  $ 

6,919  $ 

(1,928) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

53

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

A.

Description of Business

Mercury  Systems,  Inc.  is  a  technology  company  that  delivers  processing  power  for  the  most  demanding  aerospace  and
defense  missions.  Headquartered  in  Andover,  Massachusetts,  the  Company's  end-to-end  processing  platform  enables  a  broad 
range  of  aerospace  and  defense  programs,  optimized  for  mission  success  in  some  of  the  most  challenging  and  demanding 
environments.  Processing  technologies  that  comprise  the  Company's  platform  include  signal  solutions,  display,  software 
applications,  networking,  storage  and  secure  processing.  The  Company's  innovative  solutions  are  mission-ready,  trusted  and 
secure,  software-defined  and  open  and  modular  (the  Company's  differentiators),  to  meet  customers’  most-pressing  high-tech 
needs, including those specific to the defense community. 

For further details on the acquisitions, see Note C to the consolidated financial statements. 

B.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  the  Company  and  its  wholly-owned  subsidiaries.  All 

intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. 

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

All references to fiscal 2023 are to the 52-week period from July 2, 2022 to June 30, 2023. All references to fiscal 2022 
are to the 52-week period from July 3, 2021 to July 1, 2022. All references to fiscal 2021 are to the 52-week period from July 4, 
2020 to July 2, 2021. 

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires 
management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure  of 
contingent  assets  and  liabilities  at  the  dates  of  the  financial  statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses 
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company utilizes the acquisition method of accounting under ASC 805, Business Combinations, (“ASC 805”), for 
all transactions and events in which it obtains control over one or more other businesses, to recognize the fair value of all assets 
and liabilities acquired, even if less than one hundred percent ownership is acquired, and in establishing the acquisition date fair 
value  as  of  the  measurement  date  for  all  assets  and  liabilities  assumed.  The  Company  also  utilizes  ASC  805  for  the  initial 
recognition  and  measurement,  subsequent  measurement  and  accounting,  and  disclosure  of  assets  and  liabilities  arising  from 
contingencies in business combinations. Other estimates include: 

•

•

•

estimated step-ups for fixed assets and inventory;

estimated fair values of intangible assets; and

estimated income tax assets and liabilities assumed from the acquiree.

While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately
value  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed  at  the  business  acquisition  date,  the  estimates  and  assumptions  are  inherently 
uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price allocation period, which is generally one year from 
the  business  acquisition  date,  the  Company  records  adjustments  to  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed,  with  the 
corresponding offset to goodwill. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets between the preliminary and final purchase 
price allocation, the related amortization is adjusted in the period it occurs. Subsequent to the purchase price allocation period, 
any adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is 
determined. 

LEASES

The Company measures its lease obligations in accordance with ASC 842, Leases, (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees 

to recognize a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability for most lease arrangements.

The Company has arrangements involving the lease of facilities, machinery and equipment. Under ASC 842, at inception 
of  the  arrangement,  the  Company  determines  whether  the  contract  is  or  contains  a  lease  and  whether  the  lease  should  be 

54

classified  as  an  operating  or  a  financing  lease.  This  determination,  among  other  considerations,  involves  an  assessment  of 
whether the Company can control the underlying asset and have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits or 
outputs from the asset. 

The Company recognizes ROU assets and lease liabilities as of the lease commencement date based on the net present 
value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. ASC 842 requires lessees to use the rate implicit in the lease 
unless it is not readily determinable and then it may use its incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) to discount the future minimum 
lease payments. Most of the Company's lease arrangements do not provide an implicit rate; therefore, the Company uses its IBR 
to discount the future minimum lease payments. The Company determines its IBR with its credit rating and current economic 
information  available  as  of  the  commencement  date,  as  well  as  the  identified  lease  term.  During  the  assessment  of  the  lease 
term,  the  Company  considers  its  renewal  options  and  extensions  within  the  arrangements  and  the  Company  includes  these 
options when it is reasonably certain to extend the term of the lease. 

The Company has lease arrangements with both lease and non-lease components. Consideration is allocated to lease and 
non-lease components based on estimated standalone prices. The Company has elected to exclude non-lease components from 
the calculation of its ROU assets and lease liabilities. In the Company's adoption of ASC 842, leases with an initial term of 12 
months or less will not result in recognition of a ROU asset and a lease liability and will be expensed as incurred over the lease 
term. Leases of this nature were immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The  Company  has  lease  arrangements  that  contain  incentives  for  tenant  improvements  as  well  as  fixed  rent  escalation 
clauses.  For  contracts  with  tenant  improvement  incentives  that  are  determined  to  be  a  leasehold  improvement  that  will  be 
owned by the lessee and the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, it records a reduction to the lease liability and amortizes 
the  incentive  over  the  identified  term  of  the  lease  as  a  reduction  to  rent  expense.  The  Company  records  rental  expense  on  a 
straight-line basis over the identified lease term on contracts with rent escalation clauses. 

Finance leases are not material to the Company's consolidated financial statements and the Company is not a lessor in any 
material  lease  arrangements.  There  are  no  material  restrictions,  covenants,  sale  and  leaseback  transactions,  variable  lease 
payments or residual value guarantees in the Company's lease arrangements. Operating leases are included in Operating lease 
right-of-use assets, net, Accrued expenses, and Operating lease liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The 
standard  had  no  impact  on  the  Company's  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  and  Comprehensive  (Loss)  Income  or 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See Note J to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our 
obligations under leases.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the five step model set forth by ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts 
with Customers, (“ASC 606”), which involves identification of the contract(s), identification of performance obligations in the 
contract,  determination  of  the  transaction  price,  allocation  of  the  transaction  price  to  the  previously  identified  performance 
obligations, and revenue recognition as the performance obligations are satisfied. 

During step one of the five step model, the Company considers whether contracts should be combined or segmented, and 
based  on  this  assessment,  the  Company  combines  closely  related  contracts  when  all  the  applicable  criteria  are  met.  The 
combination of two or more contracts requires judgment in determining whether the intent of entering into the contracts was 
effectively to enter into a single contract, which should be combined to reflect an overall profit rate. Similarly, the Company 
may separate an arrangement, which may consist of a single contract or group of contracts, with varying rates of profitability, 
only if the applicable criteria are met. Judgment also is involved in determining whether a single contract or group of contracts 
may  be  segmented  based  on  how  the  arrangement  and  the  related  performance  criteria  were  negotiated.  The  conclusion  to 
combine a group of contracts or segment a contract could change the amount of revenue and gross profit recorded in a given 
period. 

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract’s 
transaction  price  is  allocated  to  each  distinct  performance  obligation  and  recognized  as  revenue  when  the  performance 
obligation is satisfied. Certain contracts with customers require the Company to perform tests of its products prior to shipment 
to ensure their performance complies with the Company’s published product specifications and, on occasion, with additional 
customer-requested  specifications.  In  these  cases,  the  Company  conducts  such  tests  and,  if  they  are  completed  successfully, 
includes  a  written  confirmation  with  each  order  shipped.  As  a  result,  at  the  time  of  each  product  shipment,  the  Company 
believes that no further customer testing requirements exist and that there is no uncertainty of acceptance by its customer. The 
Company's contracts with customers generally do not include a right of return relative to delivered products. In certain cases, 
contracts  are  modified  to  account  for  changes  in  the  contract  specifications  or  requirements.  In  most  instances,  contract 
modifications are accounted for as part of the existing contract. Certain contracts with customers have options for the customer 
to acquire additional goods or services. In most cases the pricing of these options are reflective of the standalone selling price of 
the  good  or  service.  These  options  do  not  provide  the  customer  with  a  material  right  and  are  accounted  for  only  when  the 

55

customer  exercises  the  option  to  purchase  the  additional  goods  or  services.  If  the  option  on  the  customer  contract  was  not 
indicative  of  the  standalone  selling  price  of  the  good  or  service,  the  material  right  would  be  accounted  for  as  a  separate 
performance obligation. 

The Company is a leading technology company serving the aerospace and defense industry, positioned at the intersection 
of  high-tech  and  defense.  Revenues  are  derived  from  the  sales  of  products  that  are  grouped  into  one  of  the  following  three 
categories:  (i)  components;  (ii)  modules  and  sub-assemblies;  and  (iii)  integrated  subsystems.  The  Company  also  generates 
revenues from the performance of services, including systems engineering support, consulting, maintenance and other support, 
testing and installation. Each promised good or service within a contract is accounted for separately under the guidance of ASC 
606  if  they  are  distinct.  Promised  goods  or  services  not  meeting  the  criteria  for  being  a  distinct  performance  obligation  are 
bundled into a single performance obligation with other goods or services that together meet the criteria for being distinct. The 
appropriate  allocation  of  the  transaction  price  and  recognition  of  revenue  is  then  determined  for  the  bundled  performance 
obligation.

Once  the  Company  identifies  the  performance  obligations,  the  Company  then  determines  the  transaction  price,  which 
includes estimating the amount of variable consideration to be included in the transaction price, if any. Variable consideration 
typically arises due to volume discounts, or other provisions that can either decrease or increase the transaction price. To the 
extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that 
should  be  included  in  the  transaction  price  utilizing  either  the  expected  value  method  or  the  most  likely  amount  method 
depending on the method the Company expects to better predict the amount of consideration to which it will be entitled. The 
determination of the estimates for variable consideration require judgment, and are based on past history with similar contracts 
and anticipated performance. Further, variable consideration is only included in the determination of the transaction price if it is 
probable that a significant reversal in the amount of revenue recognized will not occur. There are no constraints on the variable 
consideration recorded.

For  contracts  with  multiple  performance  obligations,  the  transaction  price  is  allocated  to  each  performance  obligation 
using the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. Standalone selling prices of the Company’s 
goods and services are generally not directly observable. Accordingly, the primary method used to estimate standalone selling 
price  is  the  expected  cost  plus  a  margin  approach,  under  which  the  Company  estimates  the  expected  costs  of  satisfying  a 
performance obligation and then adds an appropriate margin for that distinct good or service. The objective of the expected cost 
plus a margin approach is to determine the price at which the Company would transact if the product or service were sold by the 
Company  on  a  standalone  basis.  The  Company's  determination  of  the  expected  cost  plus  a  margin  approach  involves  the 
consideration  of  several  factors  based  on  the  specific  facts  and  circumstances  of  each  contract.  Specifically,  the  Company 
considers the cost to produce the deliverable, the anticipated margin on that deliverable, the selling price and profit margin for 
similar  parts,  the  Company’s  ongoing  pricing  strategy  and  policies,  often  based  on  the  price  list  established  and  updated  by 
management on a regular basis, the value of any enhancements that have been built into the deliverable and the characteristics 
of the varying markets in which the deliverable is sold.

The  Company  analyzes  the  standalone  selling  prices  used  in  its  allocation  of  transaction  price  on  contracts  at  least 
annually. Standalone selling prices will be analyzed on a more frequent basis if a significant change in the Company’s business 
necessitates a more frequent analysis or if the Company experiences significant variances in its selling prices.

Revenue recognized at a point in time generally relates to contracts that include a combination of components, modules 
and sub-assemblies, integrated subsystems and related system integration or other services. Contracts with distinct performance 
obligations recognized at a point in time, with or without an allocation of the transaction price, totaled 44%, 45% and 58% of 
revenues in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively. Revenue is recognized at a point 
in  time  for  these  products  and  services  (versus  over  time  recognition)  due  to  the  following:  (i)  customers  are  only  able  to 
consume the benefits provided by the Company upon completion of the product or service; (ii) customers do not control the 
product or service prior to completion; and (iii) the Company does not have an enforceable right to payment at all times for 
performance  completed  to  date.  Accordingly,  there  is  little  judgment  in  determining  when  control  of  the  good  or  service 
transfers to the customer, and revenue is generally recognized upon transfer of control (for goods) or completion (for services).

The  Company  engages  in  contracts  for  development,  production  and  service  activities  and  recognizes  revenue  for 
performance obligations over time. These over time contracts involve the design, development, manufacture, or modification of 
complex modules and sub-assemblies or integrated subsystems and related services. Revenue is recognized over time, due to 
the fact that: (i) the Company’s performance creates or enhances an asset that the customer controls as the asset is created or 
enhanced; and (ii) the Company’s performance creates an asset with no alternative use to the Company and the Company has an 
enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. The Company considers the nature of these contracts and the 
types  of  products  and  services  provided  when  determining  the  proper  accounting  for  a  particular  contract.  These  contracts 
include  both  fixed-price  and  cost  reimbursable  contracts.  The  Company’s  cost  reimbursable  contracts  typically  include  cost-
plus fixed fee and time and material (“T&M”) contracts.

56

For over time contracts, the Company typically leverages the input method, using a cost-to-cost measure of progress. The 
Company  believes  that  this  method  represents  the  most  faithful  depiction  of  the  Company’s  performance  because  it  directly 
measures value transferred to the customer. Contract estimates and estimates of any variable consideration are based on various 
assumptions to project the outcome of future events that may span several years. These assumptions include: the amount of time 
to  complete  the  contract,  including  the  assessment  of  the  nature  and  complexity  of  the  work  to  be  performed;  the  cost  and 
availability of materials; the availability of subcontractor services and materials; and the availability and timing of funding from 
the customer. The Company bears the risk of changes in estimates to complete on a fixed-price contract which may cause profit 
levels  to  vary  from  period  to  period.  For  cost  reimbursable  contracts,  the  Company  is  reimbursed  periodically  for  allowable 
costs and is paid a portion of the fee based on contract progress. In the limited instances where the Company enters into T&M 
contracts, revenue recognized reflects the number of direct labor hours expended in the performance of a contract multiplied by 
the contract billing rate, as well as reimbursement of other direct billable costs. For T&M contracts, the Company recognizes 
revenue  in  the  amount  for  which  the  Company  has  a  right  to  invoice  the  customer  based  on  the  control  transferred  to  the 
customer.  For  over  time  contracts,  the  Company  recognizes  anticipated  contract  losses  as  soon  as  they  become  known  and 
estimable.

Accounting for contracts recognized over time requires significant judgment relative to estimating total contract revenues 
and costs,  in particular, assumptions relative to the amount of time to complete the contract, including the assessment of the 
nature and complexity of the work to be performed. The Company’s estimates are based upon the professional knowledge and 
experience of its engineers, program managers and other personnel, who review each over time contract monthly to assess the 
contract’s  schedule,  performance,  technical  matters  and  estimated  cost  at  completion.  Changes  in  estimates  are  applied 
retrospectively  and  when  adjustments  in  estimated  contract  costs  are  identified,  such  revisions  may  result  in  current  period 
adjustments to earnings applicable to performance in prior periods.

Total  revenue  recognized  under  over  time  contracts  over  time  was  56%,  55%  and  42%  of  revenues  in  the  fiscal  years 

ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively.

The Company generally does not provide its customers with rights of product return other than those related to assurance 
warranty  provisions  that  permit  repair  or  replacement  of  defective  goods  over  a  period  of  12  to  36  months.  The  Company 
accrues  for  anticipated  warranty  costs  upon  product  shipment.  The  Company  does  not  consider  activities  related  to  such 
assurance  warranties,  if  any,  to  be  a  separate  performance  obligation.  The  Company  does  offer  separately  priced  extended 
warranties which generally range from 12 to 36 months that are treated as separate performance obligations. The transaction 
price allocated to extended warranties is recognized over time in proportion to the costs expected to be incurred in satisfying the 
obligations under the contract. 

On  over  time  contracts,  the  portion  of  the  payments  retained  by  the  customer  is  not  considered  a  significant  financing 
component because most contracts have a duration of less than one year and payment is received as progress is made. Many of 
the  Company's  over  time  contracts  have  milestone  payments,  which  align  the  payment  schedule  with  the  progress  towards 
completion on the performance obligation. On some contracts, the Company may be entitled to receive an advance payment, 
which is not considered a significant financing component because it is used to facilitate inventory demands at the onset of a 
contract and to safeguard the Company from the failure of the other party to abide by some or all of their obligations under the 
contract.

 All revenues are reported net of government assessed taxes (e.g., sales taxes or value-added taxes).

COSTS TO OBTAIN AND FULFILL A CONTRACT

The Company expenses sales commissions as incurred for contracts where the amortization period would have been one 
year or less. The Company had $1,328 and $1,503 of deferred sales commissions for contracts where the amortization period is 
greater than one year as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively.

The Company has elected to treat shipping and handling activities performed after the customer has obtained control of the 
related goods as a fulfillment cost. Such costs are accrued for in conjunction with the recording of revenue for the goods and are 
classified as cost of revenues.

CONTRACT BALANCES

Contract balances result from the timing of revenue recognized, billings and cash collections, and the generation of contract 
assets and liabilities. Contract assets represent revenue recognized in excess of amounts invoiced to the customer and the right 
to payment is not subject to the passage of time. Contract assets are presented as unbilled receivables and costs in excess of 
billings  on  the  Company’s  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets.  Contract  liabilities  consist  of  deferred  product  revenue,  billings  in 
excess of revenues, deferred service revenue, and customer advances. Deferred product revenue represents amounts that have 
been  invoiced  to  customers,  but  are  not  yet  recognizable  as  revenue  because  the  Company  has  not  satisfied  its  performance 
obligations  under  the  contract.  Billings  in  excess  of  revenues  represents  milestone  billing  contracts  where  the  billings  of  the 

57

contract exceed recognized revenues. Deferred service revenue primarily represents amounts invoiced to customers for annual 
maintenance contracts or extended warranty contracts, which are recognized over time in proportion to the costs expected to be 
incurred in satisfying the obligations under the contract. Customer advances represent deposits received from customers on an 
order.  Contract  liabilities  are  included  in  deferred  revenue  and  the  long-term  portion  of  deferred  revenue  is  included  within 
other non-current liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Contract balances are reported in a net position on 
a contract-by-contract basis. 

The contract asset balances were $382,558 and $303,356 as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. The contract 
asset  balance  increased  due  to  growth  in  revenue  recognized  under  contracts,  as  well  as  the  timing  of  program  milestone 
billings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The contract liability balances were $57,142 and $15,966 as of June 30, 
2023  and  July  1,  2022,  respectively.  The  contract  liability  increased  due  to  a  higher  volume  of  advanced  milestone  billing 
events as well as timing of revenue conversion across multiple programs.

Revenue recognized during fiscal 2023 that was included in the contract liability balance at July 1, 2022 was $11,258.

REMAINING PERFORMANCE OBLIGATIONS

The  Company  includes  in  its  computation  of  remaining  performance  obligations  customer  orders  for  which  it  has 
accepted  signed  sales  orders.  The  definition  of  remaining  performance  obligations  excludes  those  contracts  that  provide  the 
customer with the right to cancel or terminate the order with no substantial penalty, even if the Company’s historical experience 
indicates the likelihood of cancellation or termination is remote. As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate amount of the transaction 
price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $550,973. The Company expects to recognize approximately 62% of 
its remaining performance obligations as revenue in the next 12 months and the balance thereafter.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash  equivalents,  consisting  of  highly  liquid  money  market  funds  and  U.S.  government  and  U.S.  government  agency 
issues with original maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase, are carried at fair market value which approximates 
cost. 

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

The  Company  measures  at  fair  value  certain  financial  assets  and  liabilities,  including  cash  equivalents,  restricted  cash, 
interest  rate  derivatives,  and  contingent  consideration.  ASC  820,  Fair  Value  Measurement  and  Disclosures,  specifies  a 
hierarchy  of  valuation  techniques  based  on  whether  the  inputs  to  those  valuation  techniques  are  observable  or  unobservable. 
Observable  inputs  reflect  market  data  obtained  from  independent  sources,  while  unobservable  inputs  reflect  the  Company’s 
market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in 
markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers 
are observable in active markets; and

Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value 
drivers are unobservable.

CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Financial  instruments  that  potentially  expose  the  Company  to  concentrations  of  credit  risk  consist  principally  of  cash, 
cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions of high 
credit quality. As of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, the Company had $71,563 and $65,654, respectively, of cash and cash 
equivalents on deposit or invested with its financial and lending institutions.

The  Company  provides  credit  to  customers  in  the  normal  course  of  business.  The  Company  performs  ongoing  credit 
evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. As of June 
30, 2023, five customers accounted for 48% of the Company's accounts receivable, unbilled receivables and costs in excess of 
billings. As of July 1, 2022, five customers accounted for 45% of the Company’s accounts receivable, unbilled receivables and 
costs in excess of billings. 

The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for the estimated amount of receivables that will not be 
fully  collected.  The  allowance  is  based  on  the  assessment  of  the  following  factors:  customer  creditworthiness;  historical 
payment experience; age of outstanding receivables; and any applicable collateral.

58

INVENTORY

Inventory  is  stated  at  the  lower  of  cost  (first-in,  first-out)  or  net  realizable  value,  and  consists  of  materials,  labor  and 
overhead. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates inventory for net realizable value. Once an item is written down, the 
value becomes the new inventory cost basis. The Company reduces the value of inventory for excess and obsolete inventory, 
consisting of on-hand and non-cancelable on-order inventory in excess of estimated usage. The excess and obsolete inventory 
evaluation is based upon assumptions about future demand, product mix and possible alternative uses.

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company uses the management approach for segment disclosure, which designates the internal organization that is 
used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of its reportable segments. The 
Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment, as a leading technology company serving the aerospace 
and defense industry.

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill  is  the  amount  by  which  the  purchase  price  of  a  business  acquisition  exceeded  the  fair  values  of  the  net 
identifiable assets on the date of purchase (see Note G). In accordance with the requirements of Intangibles-Goodwill and Other 
(“ASC  350”)  Goodwill  is  not  amortized.  Goodwill  is  assessed  for  impairment  at  least  annually,  on  a  reporting  unit  basis,  or 
when events and circumstances occur indicating that the recorded goodwill may be impaired. If the book value of a reporting 
unit exceeds its fair value, the implied fair value of goodwill is compared with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying 
amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recorded in an amount equal to that excess.

Intangible assets result from the Company’s various business acquisitions (see Note H) and certain licensed technologies, 
and  consist  of  identifiable  intangible  assets,  including  completed  technology,  licensing  agreements,  patents,  customer 
relationships,  trademarks,  backlog  and  non-compete  agreements.  Intangible  assets  are  reported  at  cost,  net  of  accumulated 
amortization and are either amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of up to 12.5 years or over the 
period the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed. 

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

Long-lived assets primarily include property and equipment, intangible assets and ROU assets. The Company regularly 
evaluates its long-lived assets for events and circumstances that indicate a potential impairment in accordance with ASC 360, 
Property,  Plant,  and  Equipment  (“ASC  360”).  The  Company  reviews  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  whenever  events  or 
changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful 
lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the estimated undiscounted 
cash flows of the asset as compared to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its 
estimated fair value.

Property and equipment are the long-lived, physical assets of the Company acquired for use in the Company’s normal 
business  operations  and  are  not  intended  for  resale  by  the  Company.  These  assets  are  recorded  at  cost.  Renewals  and 
betterments that increase the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures that increase the 
efficiency of the assets are expensed as incurred. Equipment under capital lease is recorded at the present value of the minimum 
lease  payments  required  during  the  lease  period.  Depreciation  is  based  on  the  estimated  useful  lives  of  the  assets  using  the 
straight-line method (see Note F).

As  assets  are  retired  or  sold,  the  related  cost  and  accumulated  depreciation  are  removed  from  the  accounts  and  any 

resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations.

Expenditures for major software purchases and software developed for internal use are capitalized and depreciated using 
the  straight-line  method  over  the  estimated  useful  lives  of  the  related  assets,  which  are  generally  three  years.  For  software 
developed for internal use, all external direct costs for material and services and certain payroll and related fringe benefit costs 
are capitalized in accordance with ASC 350. During fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company capitalized $3,931, $3,000 and 
$1,640 of software development costs, respectively. 

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). The Company recognizes deferred 
tax  assets  and  liabilities  for  the  expected  future  tax  consequences  of  events  that  have  been  included  in  the  Company’s 
consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference 
between  the  financial  statement  and  tax  basis  of  assets  and  liabilities  using  enacted  tax  rates  for  the  year  in  which  the 
differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets if, based upon 
the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

59

ASC 740 requires a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. First, the tax position must 
be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed more-
likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial 
statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of 
being  realized  upon  ultimate  settlement.  The  Company  recognizes  interest  and  penalties  accrued  on  any  unrecognized  tax 
benefits as a component of income tax expense.

PRODUCT WARRANTY ACCRUAL

The  Company’s  product  sales  generally  include  a  12  to  36  month  standard  hardware  warranty.  At  time  of  product 
shipment, the Company accrues for the estimated cost to repair or replace potentially defective products. Estimated warranty 
costs are based upon prior actual warranty costs for substantially similar transactions and any specifically identified warranty 
requirements.  Product  warranty  accrual  is  included  as  part  of  accrued  expenses  in  the  accompanying  Consolidated  Balance 
Sheets. The following table presents the changes in the Company's product warranty accrual.

Beginning balance

Accruals for warranties issued during the period
Settlements made during the period

Ending balance

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Fiscal 2023

Fiscal 2022

Fiscal 2021

$ 

$ 

1,857  $ 
1,146 
(1,721) 
1,282  $ 

3,283  $ 
359 
(1,785) 
1,857  $ 

3,835 
2,446 
(2,998) 
3,283 

Research  and  development  costs  are  expensed  as  incurred.  Research  and  development  costs  are  primarily  made  up  of 

labor charges and prototype material and development expenses.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as 
expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of the awards 
that  will  be  forfeited.  Stock-based  compensation  expense  for  the  Company’s  performance-based  restricted  stock  awards  is 
amortized  over  the  requisite  service  period  using  graded  vesting.  The  Company’s  other  restricted  stock  awards  recognize 
expense over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. 

RETIREMENT OF COMMON STOCK

Stock that is repurchased or received in connection with the vesting of restricted stock is retired immediately upon the 
Company’s repurchase. The Company accounts for this under the cost method and upon retirement the excess amount over par 
value is charged against additional paid-in capital.

NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic  net  earnings  (loss)  per  share  is  calculated  by  dividing  net  income  by  the  weighted-average  number  of  common 
shares  outstanding  during  the  period.  Diluted  net  earnings  (loss)  per  share  computation  includes  the  effect  of  shares  which 
would be issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of restricted stock, reduced by the number of 
shares  which  are  assumed  to  be  purchased  by  the  Company  under  the  treasury  stock  method.  For  all  periods  presented,  net 
(loss) income is the control number for determining whether securities are dilutive or not. 

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were as follows: 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

Effect of dilutive equity instruments

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

Fiscal 2023

Fiscal 2022

Fiscal 2021

56,554 

— 

56,554 

55,527 

374 

55,901 

55,070 

404 

55,474 

Equity instruments to purchase 1,852, 39 and 42 shares of common stock were not included in the calculation of diluted 
net earnings per share for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively, because the equity 
instruments were anti-dilutive.

60

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

Accumulated  other  comprehensive  (loss)  income  (“AOCI”)  includes  changes  in  fair  value  of  derivative  instruments, 
foreign currency translation adjustments and pension benefit plan adjustments. The components of AOCI included  the change 
in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax adjustments are included and totaled $5,856 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 
2023 and there were no change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax adjustments for the fiscal years ended July 1, 
2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively. Also included are $300, $1,131 and $(739) of foreign currency translation adjustments for 
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively, and pension benefit plan adjustments totaled 
$142, $4,739 and $3,285 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021, respectively.

A  summary  of  the  change  in  component  of  Accumulated  other  comprehensive  (loss)  income,  net  of  tax  is  provided 

below:

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
adjustments, 
net of tax

Pension benefit 
plan, net of tax

Change in fair 
of derivative 
instruments, 
net of tax

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
(Loss) Income

Balance at July 3, 2020

$ 

659  $ 

(3,544)  $ 

—  $ 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

Balance at July 2, 2021

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

Balance at July 1, 2022

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

(739)   

(80)   

1,131 

1,051 

300 

3,285 

(259)   

4,739 

4,480 

142 

— 

— 

— 

— 

5,856 

(2,885) 

2,546 

(339) 

5,870 

5,531 

6,298 

Balance at June 30, 2023

$ 

1,351  $ 

4,622  $ 

5,856  $ 

11,829 

FOREIGN CURRENCY

Local currencies are the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries in Switzerland, the United Kingdom, France, 
Spain and Canada. The accounts of foreign subsidiaries are translated using exchange rates in effect at period-end for assets and 
liabilities  and  at  average  exchange  rates  during  the  period  for  results  of  operations.  The  related  translation  adjustments  are 
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Gains (losses) resulting from non-U.S. currency 
transactions  are  included  in  Other  income  (expense),  net  in  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  and  Comprehensive 
(Loss) Income and were immaterial for all periods presented.

61

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS 

In  October  2021,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2021-08,  Business  Combinations  (Topic  805):  Accounting  for  Contract 
Assets  and  Contract  Liabilities  from  Contracts  with  Customers,  an  amendment  of  the  FASB  Accounting  Standards 
Codification. The amendments in this ASU address diversity and inconsistency related to the recognition and measurement of 
contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination and require that an acquirer recognize and measure 
contract  assets  and  contract  liabilities  acquired  in  a  business  combination  in  accordance  with  Topic  606,  Revenue  from 
Contracts  with  Customers.  Under  current  U.S.  GAAP,  an  acquirer  generally  recognizes  assets  and  liabilities  assumed  in  a 
business combination, including contract assets and liabilities arising from revenue contracts with customers, at fair value on 
the acquisition date. ASU No. 2021-08 will result in the acquirer recording acquired contract assets and liabilities on the same 
basis that would have been recorded by the acquiree before the acquisition under Topic 606. This ASU is effective for fiscal 
years beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The impact to 
the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures of the adoption of the amendments in this update will 
depend on the magnitude of any customer contracts assumed in a business combination in fiscal 2023 and beyond.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Effective July 2, 2022, the Company adopted ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the 
Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The 
amendments in this ASU provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for 
(or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. The amendments in this ASU are elective and apply 
to all entities, subject to meeting certain criteria, that have contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference 
LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This adoption did not have a 
material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Effective  July  2,  2022,  the  Company  adopted  ASU  No.  2020-06,  Debt  -  Debt  with  conversion  and  Other  Options 
(Subtopic  470-20)  and  Derivatives  and  Hedging  -  Contracts  in  Entity's  Own  Equity  (Subtopic  815-40):  Accounting  for 
Convertible  Instruments  and  Contracts  in  an  Entity's  Own  Equity,  an  amendment  of  the  FASB  Accounting  Standards 
Codification. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for convertible debt securities. This adoption did not have a 
material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Effective December 1, 2022, the Company adopted ASU No. 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of 
the Sunset Date of Topic 848, an amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in this ASU 
extend the sunset date under Topic 848 from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024 to align the temporary accounting relief 
guidance  with  the  expected  LIBOR  cessation  date  of  June  30,  2023.  This  adoption  did  not  have  a  material  impact  to  the 
Company's consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

62

C.

Acquisitions

ATLANTA MICRO ACQUISITION 

On November 29, 2021, the Company acquired Atlanta Micro for a purchase price of $90,000, prior to net working capital 
and  net  debt  adjustments.  Based  in  Norcross,  Georgia,  Atlanta  Micro  is  a  leading  designer  and  manufacturer  of  high-
performance RF modules and components, including advanced monolithic microwave integrated circuits (“MMICs”) which are 
critical for high-speed data acquisition applications including electronic warfare, radar and weapons. The Company funded the 
acquisition through the Revolver. On March 28, 2022, the Company and former owners of Atlanta Micro agreed to post closing 
adjustments totaling $58, which increased the Company's net purchase price.

The following table presents the net purchase price and the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Atlanta Micro: 

Consideration transferred

Cash paid at closing

Working capital and net debt adjustment

Less cash acquired

Net purchase price

Fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Cash

Accounts receivable

Inventory

Fixed assets

Other current and non-current assets

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Other current and non-current liabilities

Fair value of net tangible assets acquired

Fair value of identifiable intangible assets

Goodwill

Fair value of net assets acquired

Less cash acquired

Net purchase price

Amounts

91,438 

(416) 

(1,782) 

89,240 

1,782 

1,568 

4,475 

434 

2,079 

(529) 

(845) 

(11,174) 

(2,210) 

34,980 

58,252 

91,022 

(1,782) 

89,240 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

On  November  29,  2022,  the  measurement  period  for  Atlanta  Micro  expired.  The  identifiable  intangible  assets  include 
customer  relationships  of  $27,310  with  a  useful  life  of  20  years,  completed  technology  of  $7,260  with  a  useful  life  of  eight 
years and backlog of $410 with a useful life of two years. 

The goodwill of $58,252 largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of the Company’s offerings across product 
lines and markets complementary to the Company’s existing products and markets and is not deductible for tax purposes. The 
goodwill from this acquisition is reported in the Microelectronics reporting unit.

63

AVALEX ACQUISITION 

On September 27, 2021, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire Avalex for a purchase price of $155,000, 
prior to net working capital and net debt adjustments. On November 5, 2021, the transaction closed and the Company acquired 
Avalex. Based in Gulf Breeze, Florida, Avalex is a provider of mission-critical avionics, including rugged displays, integrated 
communications management systems, digital video recorders and warning systems. The Company funded the acquisition with 
the Revolver. On March 17, 2022, the Company and former owner of Avalex agreed to post closing adjustments totaling $151, 
which increased the Company's net purchase price.

The following table presents the net purchase price and the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Avalex:  

Consideration transferred

Cash paid at closing

Working capital and net debt adjustment

Less cash acquired

Net purchase price

Fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed

Cash

Accounts receivable

Inventory

Fixed assets

Other current and non-current assets

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Other current and non-current liabilities

Fair value of net tangible assets acquired

Fair value of identifiable intangible assets

Goodwill

Fair value of net assets acquired

Less cash acquired

Net purchase price

Amounts

157,367 

(1,034) 

(2,188) 

154,145 

2,188 

5,363 

7,141 

1,245 

5,228 

(1,755) 

(1,421) 

(4,788) 

13,201 

61,360 

81,772 

156,333 

(2,188) 

154,145 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

On November 5, 2022, the measurement period for Avalex expired. The identifiable intangible assets include customer 
relationships of $41,880 with a useful life of nine years, completed technology of $14,430 with a useful life of seven years and 
backlog of $5,050 with a useful life of one year. 

The goodwill of $81,772 largely reflects the potential synergies and expansion of the Company’s offerings across product 
lines  and  markets  complementary  to  the  Company’s  existing  products  and  markets.  The  goodwill  from  this  acquisition  is 
reported in the Mission Systems reporting unit. The Company is amortizing the amount over 15 years for tax purposes. As of 
June 30, 2023, the Company had $74,676 of goodwill deductible for tax purposes. 

64

D.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets:

Interest rate swap

Total

June 30, 2023

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Fair Value Measurements

$ 

$ 

3,523  $ 

3,523  $ 

—  $ 

—  $ 

3,523  $ 

3,523  $ 

— 

— 

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, including money market funds, restricted cash, accounts receivable and 
payable, contract assets and liabilities and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these 
assets and liabilities. The Company determined the carrying value of long-term debt approximated fair value due to variable 
interest rates charged on the borrowings, which reprice frequently. 

On September 7, 2022, the Company entered into an interest rate Swap (the “initial Swap”) with JP Morgan Chase Bank, 
N.A.  (“JPMorgan”)  for  a  notional  amount  of  $300,000  in  order  to  fix  the  interest  rate  associated  with  a  portion  of  the  total 
$511,500 existing borrowings on the Revolver. The initial Swap agreement was designated and qualified for hedge accounting 
treatment as a cash flow hedge. The initial Swap matures on February 28, 2027, coterminous with the maturity of the Revolver. 
The  initial  Swap  established  a  fixed  interest  rate  on  the  first  $300,000  of  the  Company's  outstanding  borrowings  against  the 
Revolver obligation at 3.25%.

On September 29, 2022, the Company terminated the initial Swap. At the time of termination, the fair value of the initial 
Swap  was  an  asset  of  $5,995.  The  Company  received  the  cash  settlement  of  $5,995  and  these  proceeds  are  classified  within 
Operating  Activities  of  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Cash  Flows.  During  the  twelve  months  ended  June  30,  2023,  the 
Company amortized $1,017 of the gain, which is included within Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.

Following the termination of the initial Swap, the Company entered a new Swap agreement (“the Swap”) on September 
29, 2022 with JPMorgan. The Swap fixes $300,000 of the total $511,500 existing borrowings of outstanding borrowings under 
the Revolver at a rate of 3.79%. As of June 30, 2023, the fair value of the hedge was an asset of $3,523 and is included within 
Other non-current assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

E.

Inventory

Inventory was comprised of the following:

Raw materials

Work in process

Finished goods

Total

F.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

Computer equipment and software

Furniture and fixtures

Leasehold improvements

Machinery and equipment

Less: accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net

As of 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

229,984  $ 

178,410 

81,930 

25,302 

64,287 

27,642 

$ 

337,216  $ 

270,339 

Estimated Useful Lives
(Years)
3-4

As of

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

125,297  $ 

113,930 

5
lesser of estimated useful life 
or lease term
5-10

20,729 

70,305 

136,504 

352,835 

19,958 

66,117 

117,073 

317,078 

(233,281) 

(189,887) 

$ 

119,554  $ 

127,191 

The $7,637 decrease in property and equipment, net was primarily due to depreciation expense and was partially offset by 
current  year  additions.  During  fiscal  2023  and  2022,  the  Company  retired  $1,056  and  $805,  respectively,  of  computer 
equipment and software, furniture, and fixtures, leasehold improvements, and machinery and equipment that were no longer in 
use by the Company. 

65

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 

2021 was $43,777, $33,150 and $25,912, respectively.

G.

Goodwill

In  accordance  with  FASB  ASC  350,  Intangibles-Goodwill  and  Other  (“ASC  350”),  the  Company  determines  its
reporting units based upon whether discrete financial information is available, if management regularly reviews the operating 
results of the component, the nature of the products offered to customers and the market characteristics of each reporting unit. A 
reporting unit is considered to be an operating segment or one level below an operating segment also known as a component. 
Component  level  financial  information  is  reviewed  by  management  across  two  reporting  units:  Mission  Systems  and 
Microelectronics. Accordingly, these were determined to be the Company's reporting units which is consistent with the prior 
period.

The following table sets forth the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the twelve months ended June 30, 2023:

Balance at July 1, 2022

Goodwill adjustment for the Avalex acquisition

Goodwill adjustment for the Atlanta Micro acquisition

Balance at June 30, 2023

Total

$ 

937,880 

66 

147 

$ 

938,093 

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023 with no impairment noted. 

66

H.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

June 30, 2023

Customer relationships

Licensing agreements and patents

Completed technologies

Backlog

Other

July 1, 2022

Customer relationships

Licensing agreements and patents

Completed technologies

Backlog

Other

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Carrying
Amount

Weighted
Average
Useful
Life

$ 

349,120  $ 

(130,756)  $ 

218,364 

12.1 years

$ 

$ 

4,162 

134,983 

410 

3,236 

(1,423) 

(60,680) 

(325)

(676)

2,739 

74,303 

85

2,560

5.0 years

8.0 years

2.0 years

5.0 years

491,911  $ 

(193,860)  $ 

298,051 

349,710  $ 

(99,219)  $ 

250,491 

12.1 years

4,162 

161,023 

7,670 

3,236 

(592)

(68,264) 

(5,880) 

(308)

3,570

92,759 

1,790 

2,928

5.0 years

8.5 years

1.4 years

5.0 years

$ 

525,801  $ 

(174,263)  $ 

351,538 

Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets remaining at June 30, 2023 is as follows:

Fiscal Year

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

Thereafter

Total future amortization expense

Estimated salvage value of identified intangible assets

Net carrying amount

Totals

47,540 

42,836 

38,199 

35,093 

31,169 

101,822 

296,659 

1,392 

298,051 

$ 

$ 

$ 

I.

Restructuring

During  fiscal  2023,  the  Company  incurred  $6,981  of  restructuring  and  other  charges.  Restructuring  and  other  charges
primarily  related  to  $3,415  of  severance  costs,  1MPACT  related  costs  consisting  of  $1,804  for  facility  optimization  efforts, 
including  $1,339  related  to  lease  asset  impairment,  and  $1,762  of  third  party  consulting  costs.  The  Company  incurs 
restructuring  and  other  charges  in  connection  with  management's  decision  to  undertake  certain  actions  to  realign  operating 
expenses  through  workforce  reductions  and  the  closure  of  certain  Company  facilities,  businesses  and  product  lines.  The 
Company's adjustments reflected in restructuring and other charges are typically related to organizational redesign programs or 
discrete post-acquisition integration activities initiated as part of discrete post acquisition integration activities.

During  fiscal  2022,  restructuring  and  other  charges  primarily  related  to  1MPACT  including  $17,424  of  third  party 
consulting  costs,  as  well  as  $9,234  of  severance  costs  associated  with  the  elimination  of  approximately  135  positions  across 
manufacturing, SG&A and R&D based on ongoing talent and workforce optimization efforts. Fiscal 2022 also includes $787 of 
costs for facility optimization efforts associated with 1MPACT, including $544 related to lease asset impairment.

All  of  the  restructuring  and  other  charges  are  classified  as  Operating  expenses  in  the  Consolidated  Statements  of 
Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income and any remaining severance obligations are expected to be paid within the next 
twelve months. The remaining restructuring liability is classified as accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

67

The following table presents the detail of charges included in the Company’s liability for restructuring and other charges:

Restructuring liability at July 2, 2021

$ 

1,006  $ 

—  $ 

Severance & Related

Facilities & Other

Total

Restructuring charges

Cash paid

Restructuring liability at July 1, 2022

Restructuring charges

Cash paid

Reversals (*)

9,234 

(5,518) 

4,722 

3,415 

(6,608) 

— 

243 

(243)

— 

465 

(444)

(21)

Restructuring liability at June 30, 2023

$ 

1,529  $ 

—  $ 

1,006 

9,477 

(5,761)

4,722 

3,880 

(7,052)

(21)

1,529 

J.

Leases

The  Company  enters  into  lease  arrangements  to  facilitate  its  operations,  including  manufacturing,  storage,  as  well  as
engineering,  sales,  marketing  and  administration  resources.  The  Company  measures  its  lease  obligations  in  accordance  with 
ASC 842, which requires lessees to record a ROU asset and lease liability for most lease arrangements. Finance leases are not 
material to the Company's consolidated financial statements and therefore are excluded from the following disclosures.

SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

Supplemental operating lease balance sheet information is summarized as follows:

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

Accrued expenses(1)

Operating lease liabilities

Total operating lease liabilities

As of

June 30, 2023

As of 

July 1, 2022

$ 

$ 

$ 

63,015  $ 

10,434  $ 

66,797 

77,231  $ 

66,366 

11,246 

69,888 

81,134 

(1) The short term portion of the Operating lease liabilities is included within Accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

68

OTHER SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Other supplemental operating lease information is summarized as follows:

For the Fiscal Year Ended For the Fiscal Year Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities $ 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities 
$ 

Weighted average remaining lease term

Weighted average discount rate

MATURITIES OF LEASE COMMITMENTS

Maturities of operating lease commitments as of June 30, 2023 were as follows:

10,756 

10,627 

$ 

$ 

7.0 years

 5.17 %

11,119 

10,502 

7.6 years

 4.58 %

Fiscal Year
2024

2025

2026

2027
2028

Thereafter

Total lease payments

Less: imputed interest

Present value of operating lease liabilities

Totals

14,195 

14,173 

12,921 

12,669 

11,347 

27,349 

92,654 

(15,423) 

77,231 

$ 

$ 

During fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021 the Company recognized operating lease expense of $13,763, $14,332, and $11,714, 
respectively. There were no material restrictions, covenants, sale and leaseback transactions, variable lease payments or residual 
value guarantees imposed by the Company's leases at June 30, 2023.

69

K.

Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes and income tax (benefit) provision were as follows:

(Loss) income before income taxes:

United States

Foreign

Tax (benefit) provision:

Federal:

Current

Deferred

State:

Current

Deferred

Foreign:

Current

Deferred

2023

Fiscal Years

2022

2021

$ 

$ 

(42,864)  $ 

24,286  $ 

(5,678) 

(5,891) 

(48,542)  $ 

18,395  $ 

85,101 

(7,928) 

77,173 

$ 

33,898  $ 

3,857  $ 

12,157 

(54,010) 

(20,112) 

10,054 

(10,200) 

(146)

104 

(53)

51 

(230)

3,627 

3,626 

(2,721) 

905

2,535 

53

2,588 

(995)

11,162 

6,271 

(2,689) 

3,582 

435 

(50) 

385 

$ 

(20,207)  $ 

7,120  $ 

15,129 

The following is the reconciliation between the statutory Federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective income tax 

rate:

Tax provision (benefit) at federal statutory rates

State income tax, net of federal tax benefit

Research and development tax credits

Provision to return

Excess tax (benefit) provision related to stock compensation

Foreign income tax rate differential
Non-deductible compensation

Acquisition costs

Reserves for unrecognized income tax benefits

Valuation allowance

Foreign derived intangible income

Meals and entertainment

Other

2023

 (21.0) %

 (5.4) 

 (15.1) 

 (0.7) 

 2.6 

 0.2 

 1.0 

 — 

 (6.9) 

 3.8 

 (1.4) 

 0.6 

 0.7 

Fiscal Years

2022

2021

 21.0 %

 21.0 %

 8.1 

 (39.5) 

 10.3 

 5.3 

 2.3 

 20.9 

 1.2 

 5.4 

 4.3 

 (1.6) 

 0.8 

 0.2 

 6.7 

 (10.9) 

 (1.3) 

 (3.7) 

 0.9 

 3.6 

 0.4 

 1.3 

 1.9 

 (0.4) 

 0.1 

 — 

 (41.6) %

 38.7 %

 19.6 %

The effective tax rate for fiscal 2023 differed from the Federal statutory rate primarily due to Federal and state research 
and  development  tax  credits,  releases  to  reserves  for  unrecognized  income  tax  benefits  and  state  taxes,  partially  offset  by 
valuation allowances recorded and excess tax provisions related to stock compensation.

The effective tax rate for fiscal 2022 differed from the Federal statutory rate primarily due to additional tax provisions for 
non-deductible  compensation,  provision  to  return  adjustments,  state  taxes  and  excess  tax  provisions  related  to  stock 
compensation, partially offset by benefits related to research and development tax credits.

70

The effective tax rate for fiscal 2021 differed from the Federal statutory rate primarily due to benefits related to research 
and development tax credits and excess tax benefits related to stock compensation, partially offset by additional tax provisions 
related to state taxes and non-deductible compensation.

During fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021 the Company recognized a tax provision (benefit) of $1,244, $977 and $(2,831) related 

to stock compensation, respectively. 

On  August  16,  2022,  President  Biden  signed  the  Inflation  Reduction  Act  of  2022  into  law  which  contained  provisions 
that include a 15% corporate minimum tax effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022 and a 1% excise tax 
on certain stock buybacks after December 31, 2022. We expect the impact of this legislation to be immaterial.  

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2021, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("TCJA") requires 
companies to capitalize and amortize domestic research and development expenditures over five years for tax purposes, and 
foreign research and development expenditures over fifteen years for tax purposes. The cash outflow from this provision was 
$26,400 in fiscal 2023.

The components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:

Deferred tax assets:

Inventory valuation and receivable allowances
Accrued compensation

Stock compensation

Federal and state tax credit carryforwards

Other accruals

Research and development expenditures

Deferred compensation

Federal and state net operating loss carryforward

Foreign net operating loss carryforward

Operating lease liabilities

Deferred revenue

Other

Valuation allowance

Total deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Prepaid expenses

Property and equipment

Intangible assets

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

Gain on interest rate swap

Other

Total deferred tax liabilities

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

As of 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

18,095  $ 

17,248 

3,127 

5,149 

14,287 

2,705 

63,114 

930 

774 

3,166 

19,968 

1,260 

1,065 

133,640 

(14,785) 

118,855 

(1,710) 

(15,798) 

(54,550) 

(17,077) 

(2,400) 

(221)

(91,756) 

$ 

27,099  $ 

5,970 

6,154 

20,294 

1,503 

— 

930 

5,275 

1,859 

21,988 

743 

307 

82,271 

(15,349) 

66,922 

(1,815) 

(19,766) 

(59,628) 

(17,985) 

— 

(126)

(99,320) 

(32,398) 

At June 30, 2023, the Company evaluated the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. In assessing whether 
the deferred tax assets are realizable, management considered whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the 
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company's past 
and recent operating performance and results, future taxable income including the reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities, 
and  tax  planning  strategies.  The  Company  continues  to  conclude  that  its  net  deferred  tax  assets  in  Switzerland  are  not  more 
likely  than  not  to  be  realized,  and  as  such,  continues  to  maintain  a  valuation  allowance  on  such  net  deferred  tax  assets.  The 
Company also continues to conclude that certain state research and development tax credits carryforwards are not more likely 
than  not  to  be  realized,  and  as  such,  continues  to  maintain  a  valuation  allowance  on  these  carryforwards.  The  Company 

71

continues  to  conclude  that  all  other  deferred  tax  assets  are  more  likely  than  not  to  be  realized.  Any  future  changes  in  the 
valuation allowance will impact the Company's income tax provision.

Fiscal 2023 includes the impact of the TCJA, which requires companies to capitalize and amortize domestic research and 
development  expenditures  over  five  years  for  tax  purposes,  and  foreign  research  and  development  expenditures  over  fifteen 
years for tax purposes.

The Company has state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $11,697, which will expire starting in fiscal 

year 2024 through fiscal year 2038.

The  Company  has  acquired  Federal  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  of  $188,  which  have  an  unlimited  carryforward 
period. The Company has acquired state net operating loss carryforwards of $11,170, which will expire starting in fiscal year 
2040.  The  Company  has  foreign  net  operating  loss  carryforwards  of  $21,551,  which  will  expire  starting  in  fiscal  year  2028 
through  fiscal  year  2043.  The  Company  maintains  a  valuation  allowance  on  the  majority  of  the  foreign  net  operating  loss 
carryforward.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. (Federal and state) and various foreign jurisdictions that it operates in. The 
Company  has  established  income  tax  reserves  for  potential  additional  income  taxes  based  upon  management’s  assessment, 
including  recognition  and  measurement.  All  income  tax  reserves  are  analyzed  quarterly,  and  adjustments  are  made  as  events 
occur and warrant modification.

The  changes  in  the  Company’s  income  tax  reserves  for  gross  unrecognized  income  tax  benefits,  including  interest  and 

penalties, are summarized as follows:

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period

Increases for tax positions taken related to a prior period

Increases for tax positions taken during the current period

Decreases for tax positions taken by an acquired company

Decreases for tax positions taken related to a prior period

Decreases for settlements of previously recognized positions

Decreases as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

Fiscal Years

2023

2022

$ 

9,112  $ 

7,467 

— 

1,260 

(2,679) 

(191)

(93)

(2,244) 

160 

990 

615 

—

(92)

(28) 

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period

$ 

5,165  $ 

9,112 

The $5,165 of unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2023, if released, would reduce the Company's income tax 

provision.

The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes.  
The total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $583 and $488 as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively, 
and the amount of interest and penalties recognized in fiscal 2023 and 2022 was $96 and $172, respectively. 

The Company’s major tax jurisdiction is the U.S. (Federal and state) and the open tax years are fiscal 2017 through 2023. 

L.

Commitments and Contingencies

LEGAL CLAIMS

The Company is subject to litigation, claims, investigations and audits arising from time to time in the ordinary course of 
business. Although legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, the Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect 
to any matters currently pending against the Company and intends to defend itself vigorously. The outcome of these matters, 
individually and in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's cash flows, results of operations, 
or financial position. 

We  are  subject  to  litigation,  claims,  investigations  and  audits  arising  from  time  to  time  in  the  ordinary  course  of  our 
business. Although legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have valid defenses with respect to those 
matters currently pending against us and intend to defend ourself vigorously. The outcome of these matters, individually and in 
the aggregate, is not expected to have a material impact on our cash flows, results of operations, or financial position.

72

On  June  23  2021,  Embedded  Reps  of  America,  LLC  (“ERA”),  a  former  sales  representative,  and  James  Mazzola,  a 
principal  of  ERA,  filed  for  binding  arbitration  related  to  the  termination  of  ERA’s  sales  representative  agreement  raising 
multiple claims that aggregate to approximately $9,000 in direct damages, with treble damages requested on a number of those 
claims. ERA was a sales representative of Themis when Themis was acquired by Mercury. The sales representative agreement 
provided for termination by either party upon 30 days written notice with ERA entitled to commissions for orders obtained by 
ERA  with  product  shipment  occurring  prior  to  termination.  The  Company  responded  to  the  complaint  in  July  2021.  An 
arbitration proceeding was held during September 2022 with final motions in October 2022, and oral arguments in November 
2022. The arbitrator issued its final ruling in January 2023, awarding ERA $72 in damages and fees.

On  December  7,  2021,  counsel  for  National  Technical  Systems,  Inc.  (“NTS”)  sent  the  Company  an  environmental 
demand  letter  pursuant  to  Massachusetts  General  Laws  Chapter  21E,  Section  4A,  and  CERCLA  42  U.S.C.  Section  9601, 
related to a site that NTS formerly owned at 533 Main Street, Acton, Massachusetts. NTS received a Notice of Responsibility 
from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (“MassDEP”) alleging trichloroethene, freon and 1,4-dioxane 
contamination in the groundwater emanating from NTS’s former site. NTS alleges in its demand letter that the operations of a 
predecessor company to Mercury that was acquired in the Company's acquisition of the Microsemi carve-out business that once 
owned and operated a facility at 531 Main Street, Acton, Massachusetts contributed to the groundwater contamination. NTS is 
seeking payment from the Company of NTS’s costs for any required environmental remediation. In April 2022, the Company 
engaged in a meet and confer session with NTS pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 21E, Section 4A to discuss 
the status of the environmental review performed by NTS and its licensed site professional. In addition in November 2021, the 
Company  responded  to  a  request  for  information  from  MassDEP  regarding  the  detection  of  PFAS  (per-  and  polyfluoroakyl 
substances) in the Acton, Massachusetts Water District’s Conant public water supply wells near the former facility at 531 Main 
Street, Acton, Massachusetts at a level above the standard that MassDEP published for PFAS in October 2020. The Company 
has not been contacted by NTS or MassDEP since the dates discussed above. It is too early to determine what responsibility, if 
any, the Company may have for these environmental matters.

On June 19, 2023, the Board of Directors received notice of our former CEO's resignation from the positions of President 
and  Chief  Executive  Officer.  The  Board  accepted  the  resignation  effective  June  24,  2023.  In  the  notice,  the  former  CEO 
claimed  entitlement  to  certain  benefits,  including  equity  vesting,  severance,  and  other  benefits,  under  the  change  in  control 
severance agreement (the "CIC Agreement") because the former CEO had resigned with good reason during a potential change 
in control period. The Company disputes these claims and maintain that the former CEO resigned without good reason. The 
parties must submit any dispute under the CIC Agreement to binding arbitration. The Company intends to contest vigorously 
any claims under the CIC Agreement and believe that the Company has strong arguments that our former CEO's claims lack 
merit. If the arbitrator rules in the Company's favor, the Company may still need to pay the former CEO's reasonable legal fees. 
If instead the arbitrator rules for the former CEO, the Company could be liable for up to approximately $12,900, based on the 
closing price of our common stock on June 26, 2023, plus legal fees and expenses, for accelerated equity vesting, severance, 
and  other  benefits  under  the  CIC  Agreement.  The  Company  categorically  denies  any  wrongdoing  or  liability  under  the  CIC 
Agreement,  but  the  outcome  of  potential  arbitration  is  inherently  uncertain.  Accordingly,  it  is  reasonably  possible  that  the 
Company will incur a liability in this matter and estimate the potential range of exposure from $0 to $12,900, plus costs and 
attorneys' fees.

INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS

The Company's standard product sales and license agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business typically 
contain an indemnification provision pursuant to which the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the 
indemnified  party  for  losses  suffered  or  incurred  by  the  indemnified  party  in  connection  with  any  patent,  copyright  or  other 
intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to the Company's products. Such provisions generally 
survive termination or expiration of the agreements. The potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to 
make under these indemnification provisions is, in some instances, unlimited. 

PURCHASE COMMITMENTS

As  of  June  30,  2023,  the  Company  has  entered  into  non-cancelable  purchase  commitments  for  certain  inventory 
components and services used in its normal operations. The purchase commitments covered by these agreements are for less 
than one year and aggregate to $127,134.

OTHER

The Company may elect from time to time to purchase and subsequently retire shares of common stock in order to settle 
an  individual  employees’  tax  liability  associated  with  vesting  of  a  restricted  stock  award  or  exercise  of  stock  options.  These 
transactions are treated as a use of cash in financing activities in the Company's Statements of Cash Flows.

73

M.

Debt

Revolving Credit Facilities

On  February  28,  2022,  the  Company  amended  the  Revolver  to  increase  and  extend  the  borrowing  capacity  to  a 
$1,100,000, 5-year revolving credit line, with the maturity extended to February 28, 2027. As of June 30, 2023, the Company's 
outstanding balance of unamortized deferred financing costs was $3,446, which is being amortized to Other (expense) income, 
net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income.

Maturity

The Revolver has a 5-year maturity and will mature on February 28, 2027.

Interest Rates and Fees

Borrowings  under  the  Revolver  bear  interest,  at  the  Company’s  option,  at  floating  rates  tied  to  Secured  Overnight 
Financing Rate ("SOFR") or the prime rate plus an applicable percentage in the case of dollar denominated loans or, in the case 
of  certain  other  currencies,  such  alternative  floating  rates  as  agreed.  The  interest  rate  applicable  to  outstanding  loans  has 
initially been set at SOFR plus 1.25% and in future fiscal quarters will be established pursuant to a pricing grid based on the 
Company’s total net leverage ratio.

In addition to interest on the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of any borrowings, the Company will also pay a 
quarterly  commitment  fee  on  the  unutilized  commitments  under  the  Revolver,  which  fee  has  initially  been  set  at  0.20%  per 
annum  and  in  future  fiscal  quarters  will  be  established  pursuant  to  a  pricing  grid  based  on  the  Company’s  total  net  leverage 
ratio. The Company will also pay customary letter of credit and agency fees.

Covenants and Events of Default

The Revolver provides for customary negative covenants, including, among other things and subject to certain significant 
exceptions, restrictions on the incurrence of debt or guarantees, the creation of liens, the making of certain investments, loans 
and acquisitions, mergers and dissolutions, the sale of assets including capital stock of subsidiaries, the payment of dividends, 
the repayment or amending of junior debt, altering the business conducted, engaging in transactions with affiliates and entering 
into  agreements  limiting  subsidiary  dividends  and  distributions.  The  Revolver  also  requires  the  Company  to  comply  with 
certain  financial  covenants,  including  a  quarterly  minimum  consolidated  cash  interest  charge  ratio  test  and  a  quarterly 
maximum consolidated total net leverage ratio test.

The  Revolver  also  provides  for  customary  representations  and  warranties,  affirmative  covenants  and  events  of  default 
(including,  among  others,  the  failure  to  make  required  payments  of  principal  and  interest,  certain  insolvency  events  and  an 
event of default upon a change of control). If an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Revolver will be entitled to take 
various  actions,  including  the  termination  of  unutilized  commitments,  the  acceleration  of  amounts  outstanding  under  the 
Revolver and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.

Guarantees and Security

The  Company’s  obligations  under  the  Revolver  are  guaranteed  by  certain  of  the  Company’s  material  domestic  wholly-
owned  restricted  subsidiaries  (the  “Guarantors”).  The  obligations  of  both  the  Company  and  the  Guarantors  are  secured  by  a 
perfected security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company and the Guarantors, in each case, now owned or later 
acquired, including a pledge of all of the capital stock of substantially all of the Company’s domestic wholly-owned restricted 
subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of certain of its foreign restricted subsidiaries, subject in each case to the exclusion of 
certain assets and additional exceptions.

As  of  June  30,  2023,  the  Company  was  in  compliance  with  all  covenants  and  conditions  under  the  Revolver  and  there 
were outstanding borrowings of $511,500 against the Revolver as compared to $451,500 for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2022, 
resulting in interest expense of $25,159 and $5,806 for fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. The 
current  borrowing  capacity  as  defined  under  the  Revolver  as  of  June  30,  2023  is  approximately  $865,000,  of  which  we  had 
outstanding borrowings against of $511,500. There were outstanding letters of credit of $963 as of June 30, 2023. 

74

N.

Employee Benefit Plans

Pension Plan

The Company maintains a pension plan (the “Plan”) for its Swiss employees, which is administered by an independent 
pension  fund.  The  Plan  is  mandated  by  Swiss  law  and  meets  the  criteria  for  a  defined  benefit  plan  under  ASC  715, 
Compensation—Retirement  Benefits  (“ASC  715”),  since  participants  of  the  Plan  are  entitled  to  a  defined  rate  of  return  on 
contributions made. The independent pension fund is a multi-employer plan with unrestricted joint liability for all participating 
companies for which the Plan’s overfunding or underfunding is allocated to each participating company based on an allocation 
key determined by the Plan. 

The  Company  recognizes  a  net  asset  or  liability  for  the  Plan  equal  to  the  difference  between  the  projected  benefit 
obligation of the Plan and the fair value of the Plan’s assets as required by ASC 715. The funded status may vary from year to 
year due to changes in the fair value of the Plan’s assets and variations on the underlying assumptions of the projected benefit 
obligation of the Plan.

In fiscal 2021, the independent pension fund changed the conversion rate for accumulated retirement savings leading to a 
Plan amendment. The Company’s results contain the effects of this change in conversion rates by the independent pension fund 
as prior service costs. These prior service costs are amortized from AOCI to net periodic benefit costs over approximately nine 
years.

At  June  30,  2023,  the  accumulated  benefit  obligation  of  the  Plan  equals  the  fair  value  of  the  Plan's  assets.  The  Plan's 
funded  status  at  June  30,  2023  and  July  1,  2022  was  a  net  liability  of  $4,151  and  $4,660,  respectively,  which  is  recorded  in 
other  non-current  liabilities  on  the  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets.  The  Company  recorded  a  net  gain  of  $142  and  $4,739  in 
AOCI during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. Total employer contributions to the Plan were 
$1,158 during the year ended June 30, 2023, and the Company's total expected employer contributions to the Plan during fiscal 
2024 are $1,122.

The  following  table  reflects  the  total  pension  benefits  expected  to  be  paid  from  the  Plan,  which  is  funded  from 

contributions by participants and the Company.

Fiscal Year 
2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

Thereafter (next 5 years)

Total

Total

$ 

1,312 

1,367 

1,064 

1,433 

1,550 

8,905 

$ 

15,631 

75

The following table outlines the components of net periodic benefit cost of the Plan for the fiscal years ended June 30, 

2023 and July 1, 2022:

Service cost

Interest cost

Expected return on assets

Amortization of prior service cost

Amortization net of loss

Settlement loss recognized

Net periodic benefit cost

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

1,068 

$ 

463 

(379)

(203)

— 

(509)

1,405 

83 

(272)

(190)

5 

—

$ 

440 

$ 

1,031 

The following table reflects the related actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost of the Plan for 

the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022:

Discount rate

Expected rate of return on Plan assets

Expected inflation

Rate of compensation increases

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

 1.95 %
 1.95 %

 1.00 %

 1.50 %

 1.70 %
 1.70 %

 1.00 %

 1.50 %

The calculation of the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) utilized BVG 2020 Generational data for assumptions related 

to the mortality rates, disability rates, turnover rates, and early retirement ages. 

76

The PBO represents the present value of Plan benefits earned through the end of the year, with an allowance for future 
salary and pension increases as well as turnover rates. The following table presents the change in projected benefit obligation 
for the periods presented:

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

Projected benefit obligation, beginning

$ 

25,509 

$ 

Service cost

Interest cost

Employee contributions

Actuarial gain

Benefits paid

Settlements 

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

1,068 

463 

1,439 

(516)

(246)

(4,770) 

1,763 

$ 

24,710 

$ 

28,614 

1,405 

83 

2,606 

(4,720)

(1,444)

— 

(1,035) 

25,509 

The following table presents the change in Plan assets for the periods presented:

Fair value of Plan assets, beginning

Actual return on Plan assets

Company contributions

Employee contributions

Benefits paid

Settlements

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

Fair value of Plan assets at end of year

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

20,849 

$ 

700 

1,158 

1,439 

(246)

(4,770) 

1,429 

18,807 

514 

1,056 

2,606 

(1,444)

— 

(690) 

$ 

20,559 

$ 

20,849 

The following table presents the Company's reconciliation of funded status for the period presented:

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

Funded status

As of 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

$ 

$ 

24,710 

$ 

20,559 

(4,151) 

$ 

25,509 

20,849 

(4,660) 

The fair value of Plan assets were $20,559 at June 30, 2023. The Plan is denominated in a foreign currency, the Swiss 
Franc, which can have an impact on the fair value of Plan assets. The Plan was not subject to material fluctuations during the 
years ended June 30, 2023 or July 1, 2022. The Plan’s assets are administered by an independent pension fund foundation (the 
“foundation”). As of June 30, 2023, the foundation has invested the assets of the Plan in various investments vehicles, including 
cash, real estate, equity securities, and bonds. The investments are measured at fair value using a mix of Level 1, Level 2 and 
Level 3 inputs.

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a qualified 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for its U.S. employees. Effective in the first quarter 
of  fiscal  2023,  the  Company  increased  the  rate  of  its  matching  contributions  from  3%  to  6%  of  participants'  eligible  annual 
compensation and changed the form of these contributions from cash to Company stock. The Company may also make optional 
contributions  to  the  plan  for  any  plan  year  at  its  discretion.  The  Company  had  $2,705  of  capitalized  stock-based  401(k) 
matching  compensation  expense  on  the  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  at  June  30,  2023.  Stock-based  401(k)  matching 
compensation cost is measured based on the value of the matching amount and is recognized as expense as incurred. Expense 
recognized by the Company for matching contributions related to the 401(k) plan was $15,665, $7,603, and $7,876 during the 
fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022, and July 2, 2021, respectively.

77

O.

Shareholders’ Equity

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

SHELF REGISTRATION STATEMENT

On  September  14,  2020,  the  Company  filed  a  shelf  registration  statement  on  Form  S-3ASR  with  the  SEC.  The  shelf 
registration statement, which was effective upon filing with the SEC, registered each of the following securities: debt securities; 
preferred  stock;  common  stock;  warrants;  and  units.  The  Company  has  an  unlimited  amount  available  under  the  shelf 
registration  statement.  The  Company  intends  to  file  a  renewal  of  the  S-3ASR  in  September  2023  upon  the  expiration  of  the 
three-year term of the current shelf registration statement.

STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN

On  December  27,  2021,  the  Company's  Board  of  Directors  authorized  and  declared  a  dividend  of  one  preferred  share 
purchase right (a “Right”), payable on January 10, 2022, for each outstanding share of common stock par value $0.01 per share 
to the stockholders of record on that date. Each Right entitled the registered holder to purchase from the Company a unit of 
Series A Junior Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company at a designated price per unit, subject to adjustment. 
The Rights initially trade with, and are inseparable from, the shares of common stock. 

On  June  24,  2022,  the  Company  amended  the  Rights  Agreement,  dated  as  of  December  27,  2021,  to  increase  the 
ownership  threshold  for  a  person  to  be  an  “Acquiring  Person”  (as  defined  in  the  Rights  Agreement)  from  7.5%  of  common 
stock to 10% of common stock (10% of common stock to 20% of common stock in the case of a passive institutional investor). 

Additional details about the Rights Agreement are contained in the Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company 

with the SEC on December 29, 2021 and June 24, 2022.

On October 26, 2022 the Stockholder Rights Plan and the Rights thereunder expired.

P.

Stock-Based Compensation

STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS

The  Board  of  Directors  approved  the  Company’s  2018  Stock  Incentive  Plan  (the  “2018  Plan”)  on  July  23,  2018.  The 
2018 Plan became effective upon the approval of shareholders at the Company’s annual meeting held on October 24, 2018. The 
aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan is 6,782 shares, with an additional 710 shares rolled 
into  the  2018  Plan  that  were  available  for  future  grant  under  the  Company’s  2005  Stock  Incentive  Plan,  as  amended  and 
restated  (the  “2005  Plan”)  and  increases  of  3,000  and  2,000  shares  approved  by  the  Company's  shareholders  on  October  28, 
2020 and October 26, 2022, respectively. The 2018 Plan replaced the 2005 Plan. The 2018 Plan provides for the grant of non-
qualified  and  incentive  stock  options,  restricted  stock,  stock  appreciation  rights  and  deferred  stock  awards  to  employees  and 
non-employees. There were 3,512 shares available for future grant under the 2018 Plan at June 30, 2023. 

As part of the Company's ongoing annual equity grant program for employees, the Company grants performance-based 
restricted stock awards to certain executives and employees pursuant to the 2018 Plan. Performance awards vest based on the 
requisite service period subject to the achievement of specific financial performance targets. Based on the performance targets, 
some  of  these  awards  require  graded  vesting  which  results  in  more  rapid  expense  recognition  compared  to  traditional  time-
based vesting over the same vesting period. The Company monitors the probability of achieving the performance targets on a 
quarterly basis and may adjust periodic stock compensation expense accordingly based on its determination of the likelihood 
for reaching targets. The performance targets generally include the achievement of internal performance targets in relation to a 
peer group of companies.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The  number  of  shares  authorized  for  issuance  under  the  Company’s  1997  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan,  as  amended 
and  restated  (“ESPP”),  is  2,300  shares,  including  500  shares  approved  by  the  Company's  shareholders  on  October  28,  2020. 
Under the ESPP, rights are granted to purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the lesser of the market value of such shares 
at either the beginning or the end of each six-month offering period. The ESPP permits employees to purchase common stock 
through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 10% of an employee’s compensation as defined in the ESPP. The number of 
shares issued under the ESPP during fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 was 145, 115 and 101, respectively. Shares available for 
future purchase under the ESPP totaled 168 at June 30, 2023.

78

STOCK AWARD ACTIVITY

Outstanding at July 2, 2021
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Outstanding at July 1, 2022
Granted
Vested

Forfeited

Outstanding at June 30, 2023

Non-Vested Restricted Stock Awards

Number of
Shares

Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

1,013  $ 
1,993 
(477)
(224)
2,305  $ 
298 

(738)

(526)

1,339  $ 

70.77 
52.70 
61.42
66.66
57.47 
51.90 

60.89

55.66

54.45 

The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested during fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $25,587, $25,533 and 

$34,342, respectively.

Non-vested restricted stock awards are subject to the risk of forfeiture until the fulfillment of specified conditions. As of 
June 30, 2023, there was $50,292 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards granted 
under the Company’s stock plans that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years from June 30, 
2023. 

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE

The Company recognizes expense for its share-based payment plans in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and 
Comprehensive (Loss) Income in accordance with ASC 718. The Company had $1,215 and $1,229 of capitalized stock-based 
compensation expense on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022, respectively. Under the fair 
value recognition provisions of ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the 
award and is recognized as expense over the service period. The following table presents share-based compensation expenses 
from  continuing  operations  included  in  the  Company’s  Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations  and  Comprehensive  (Loss) 
Income:

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

Cost of revenues

Selling, general and administrative

Research and development

Stock-based compensation expense before tax

Income taxes

$ 

2,926  $ 

2,161  $ 

18,335 

6,492 

27,753 

(7,216) 

30,116 

6,016 

38,293 

(10,339) 

Stock-based compensation expense, net of income taxes

20,537  $ 

27,954  $ 

2,037 

21,866 

4,387 

28,290 

(7,355) 

20,935 

Q.

Operating Segment, Geographic Information and Significant Customers

Operating  segments  are  defined  as  components  of  an  enterprise  evaluated  regularly  by  the  Company's  chief  operating
decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company evaluated this internal 
reorganization  under  FASB  ASC  280,  Segment  Reporting  ("ASC  280")  to  determine  whether  this  change  has  impacted  the 
Company's  single  operating  and  reportable  segment.  The  Company  concluded  this  change  had  no  effect  given  the  CODM 
continues to evaluate and manage the Company on the basis of one operating and reportable segment. The Company utilized 
the management approach for determining its operating segment in accordance with ASC 280. 

79

The geographic distribution of the Company’s revenues as determined by order origination based on the country in which 

the Company's legal subsidiary is domiciled is summarized as follows:

U.S.

Europe

Asia Pacific 

Eliminations

Total

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Net revenues to unaffiliated 
customers

Inter-geographic revenues

Net revenues

Identifiable long-lived assets (1)

YEAR ENDED JULY 1, 2022

Net revenues to unaffiliated 
customers

Inter-geographic revenues

Net revenues

Identifiable long-lived assets (1)

YEAR ENDED JULY 2, 2021

Net revenues to unaffiliated 
customers

Inter-geographic revenues

Net revenues

Identifiable long-lived assets (1)

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

927,003  $ 

46,857  $ 

2,764 

447 

929,767  $ 

47,304  $ 

116,381  $ 

3,173  $ 

22  $ 

— 

22  $ 

—  $ 

—  $ 

973,882 

(3,211) 

(3,211)  $ 

—  $ 

— 

973,882 

119,554 

945,600  $ 

41,390  $ 

1,207  $ 

—  $ 

988,197 

2,578 

2,408 

— 

(4,986) 

948,178  $ 

43,798  $ 

1,207  $ 

(4,986)  $ 

122,712  $ 

4,476  $ 

3  $ 

—  $ 

— 

988,197 

127,191 

876,479  $ 

47,119  $ 

398  $ 

—  $ 

923,996 

1,561 

1,985 

— 

(3,546) 

878,040  $ 

49,104  $ 

398  $ 

(3,546)  $ 

123,009  $ 

5,509  $ 

6  $ 

—  $ 

— 

923,996 

128,524 

(1) Identifiable long-lived assets exclude ROU assets, goodwill and intangible assets.

In recent years, the Company completed a series of acquisitions that changed its technological capabilities, applications 
and end markets. As these acquisitions and changes occurred, the Company's proportion of revenue derived from the sale of 
components  in  different  technological  areas,  and  modules,  sub-assemblies  and  integrated  subsystems  which  combine 
technologies  into  more  complex  diverse  products  has  shifted.  The  following  tables  present  revenue  consistent  with  the 
Company's strategy of expanding its technological capabilities and program content. As additional information related to the 
Company’s products by end user, application, product grouping and/or platform is attained, the categorization of these products 
can  vary  over  time.  When  this  occurs,  the  Company  reclassifies  revenue  by  end  user,  application,  product  grouping  and/or 
platform for prior periods. Such reclassifications typically do not materially change the underlying trends of results within each 
revenue category.

The following table presents the Company's net revenue by end market for the periods presented:

Domestic (1)
International/Foreign Military Sales (2)

Total Net Revenue

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

865,216  $ 

861,125  $ 

795,988 

108,666 

127,072 

128,008 

$ 

973,882  $ 

988,197  $ 

923,996 

(1) Domestic revenues consist of sales where the end user is within the U.S., as well as sales to prime defense contractor customers where the ultimate end user 
location is not defined. 
(2) International/Foreign Military Sales consist of sales to U.S. prime defense contractor customers where the end user is outside the U.S., foreign military sales
through the U.S. government, and direct sales to non-U.S. based customers intended for end use outside of the U.S.

80

The following table presents the Company's net revenue by end application for the periods presented:

Radar (1)

Electronic Warfare (2)

Other Sensor and Effector (3)

Total Sensor and Effector

C4I (4)

Other (5)

Total Net Revenues

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

229,467  $ 

251,126  $ 

289,172 

144,554 

112,659 

486,680 

414,143 

73,059 

157,676 

104,114 

512,916 

399,816 

75,465 

139,168 

98,112 

526,452 

307,978 

89,566 

$ 

973,882  $ 

988,197  $ 

923,996 

(1) Radar includes end-use applications where radio frequency signals are utilized to detect, track and identify objects.
(2) Electronic Warfare includes end-use applications comprising the offensive and defensive use of the electromagnetic spectrum.
(3) Other Sensor and Effector products include all Sensor and Effector end markets other than Radar and Electronic Warfare.
(4) C4I includes rugged secure rackmount servers that are designed to drive the most powerful military processing applications.
(5) Other products include all component and other sales where the end use is not specified.

81

The following table presents the Company's net revenue by product grouping for the periods presented:

Components (1)

Modules and Sub-assemblies (2)

Integrated Subsystems (3)

Total Net Revenues

Fiscal Years Ended 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

197,180  $ 

167,333  $ 

176,234 

200,281 

576,421 

167,242 

653,622 

156,557 

591,205 

$ 

973,882  $ 

988,197  $ 

923,996 

(1) Components represent the basic building blocks of an electronic system. They generally perform a single function such as switching, storing or converting
electronic signals. Some examples include power amplifiers and limiters, switches, oscillators, filters, equalizers, digital and analog converters, chips, MMICs 
(monolithic microwave integrated circuits) and memory and storage devices.
(2) Modules and sub-assemblies combine multiple components to serve a range of complex functions, including processing, networking and graphics display. 
Typically delivered as computer boards or other packaging, modules and sub-assemblies are usually designed using open standards to provide interoperability 
when integrated in a subsystem. Examples of modules and sub-assemblies include embedded processing boards, switched fabrics and boards for high-speed 
input/output, digital receivers, graphics and video, along with multi-chip modules, integrated radio frequency and microwave multi-function assemblies and
radio frequency tuners and transceivers.
(3) Integrated subsystems bring components, modules and/or sub-assemblies into one system, enabled with software. Subsystems are typically, but not always, 
integrated within an open standards-based chassis and often feature interconnect technologies to enable communication between disparate systems. Spares and 
replacement modules and sub-assemblies are provided for use with subsystems sold by the Company. The Company’s subsystems are deployed in sensor 

processing, aviation and mission computing and C4I applications.

The following table presents the Company's net revenue by platform for the periods presented:

Airborne (1)

Land (2)

Naval (3)

Other (4)

Total Net Revenues

Fiscal Years Ended 

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

$ 

506,264  $ 

506,549  $ 

416,877 

157,505 

136,954 

173,159 

158,782 

155,588 

167,278 

182,591 

187,205 

137,323 

$ 

973,882  $ 

988,197  $ 

923,996 

(1) Airborne platform includes products that relate to personnel, equipment or pieces of equipment designed for airborne applications.
(2) Land platform includes products that relate to fixed or mobile equipment, or pieces of equipment for personnel, weapon systems, vehicles and support
elements operating on land.
(3) Naval platform includes products that relate to personnel, equipment or pieces of equipment designed for naval operations.
(4) All platforms other than Airborne, Land or Naval.

Customers comprising 10% or more of the Company’s revenues for the periods shown below are as follows:

RTX Corporation

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Northrop Grumman

U.S. Navy

Fiscal Years Ended

June 30, 2023

July 1, 2022

July 2, 2021

 14 %

 13 %

 11 %

*

 38 %

 14 %

 10 %

*

 14 %

 38 %

 19 %

 15 %

*

 12 %

 46 %

*

Indicates that the amount is less than 10% of the Company's revenue for the respective period.

While the Company typically has customers from which it derives 10% or more of its revenue, the sales to each of these
customers  are  spread  across  multiple  programs  and  platforms.  There  were  no  programs  comprising  10%  or  more  of  the 
Company's revenues for the years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022 and July 2, 2021.

82

R.

Derivatives

The  Company  utilizes  interest  rate  derivatives  to  mitigate  interest  rate  exposure  with  respect  to  its  financing
arrangements.  On  September  7,  2022,  the  Company  entered  into  an  interest  rate  Swap  (the  “initial  Swap”)  with  JP  Morgan 
Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) for a notional amount of $300,000 in order to fix the interest rate associated with a portion of 
the  total  $511,500  existing  borrowings  on  the  Revolver.  The  initial  Swap  agreement  was  designated  and  qualified  for  hedge 
accounting treatment as a cash flow hedge. The initial Swap matured on February 28, 2027, coterminous with the maturity of 
the Revolver. The initial Swap established a fixed interest rate on the first $300,000 of the Company's outstanding borrowings 
against the Revolver obligation at 3.25%.

On September 29, 2022, the Company terminated the initial Swap. At the time of termination, the fair value of the initial 
Swap  was  an  asset  of  $5,995.  The  Company  received  the  cash  settlement  of  $5,995  and  these  proceeds  are  classified  within 
Operating Activities of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company is amortizing the gain over the term of the 
Revolver and during the twelve months ended June 30, 2023, the Company amortized $1,017 of the gain, which is included 
within Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income.

Following the termination of the initial Swap, the Company entered a new Swap agreement (“the Swap”) on September 
29, 2022 with JPMorgan. The Swap fixes $300,000 of the total $511,500 existing borrowings of outstanding borrowings under 
the Revolver at a rate of 3.79%. The Swap matures on February 28, 2027, coterminous with the maturity of the Revolver. As of 
June  30,  2023,  the  fair  value  of  the  hedge  was  an  asset  of  $3,523  and  is  included  within  Other  non-current  assets  in  the 
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The  market  risk  associated  with  the  Company’s  derivative  instrument  is  the  result  of  interest  rate  movements  that  are 
expected  to  offset  the  market  risk  of  the  underlying  arrangement.  The  counterparty  to  the  Swap  is  JPMorgan.  Based  on  the 
credit  ratings  of  the  Company’s  counterparty  as  of  June  30,  2023,  nonperformance  is  not  perceived  to  be  a  material  risk. 
Furthermore,  none  of  the  Company’s  derivatives  are  subject  to  collateral  or  other  security  arrangements  and  none  contain 
provisions  that  are  dependent  on  the  Company’s  credit  ratings  from  any  credit  rating  agency.  While  the  contract  or  notional 
amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the 
amount  of  the  Company’s  exposure  to  credit  risk.  The  amounts  potentially  subject  to  credit  risk  (arising  from  the  possible 
inability  of  the  counterparty  to  meet  the  terms  of  their  contracts)  are  generally  limited  to  the  amounts,  if  any,  by  which  the 
counterparty obligations under the contracts exceed the obligations of the Company to the counterparty. As a result of the above 
considerations, the Company does not consider the risk of counterparty default to be significant.

S.

Subsequent Events

The  Company  has  evaluated  subsequent  events  from  the  date  of  the  Consolidated  Balance  Sheet  through  the  date  the

consolidated financial statements were issued.

The  Company  has  initiated  several  immediate  cost  savings  measures  that  simplify  the  Company’s  organizational 
structure, facilitate clearer accountability, and align to the Company’s priorities, including: (i) embedding the 1MPACT value 
creation initiatives and execution into the Company’s  operations; (ii) streamlining organizational structure and removing areas 
of redundancy between corporate and divisional organizations; and (iii) reduce selling, general, and administrative headcount 
and rebalancing discretionary and third party spending to better align with the Company’s priority areas. On July 20, 2023, the 
Company  executed  the  plan  to  embed  the  1MPACT  value  creation  initiatives  into  operations,  and  on  August  9,  2023,  the 
Company  approved  and  initiated  a  workforce  reduction  that,  together  with  the  1MPACT  related  action,  eliminates 
approximately  150  positions,  resulting  in  expected  restructuring  charges  of  approximately  $9,000.  These  charges  are  for 
employee  separation  costs  and  will  be  classified  as  restructuring  and  other  charges  within  the  Company’s  Statement  of 
Operations and Other Comprehensive Income for the fiscal quarter ending September 29, 2023. 

ITEM 9.

None.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND 
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) EFFECTIVENESS OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We  conducted  an  evaluation  as  of  June  30,  2023  under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  our  management,
including  our  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  (our  principal  executive  officer  and  principal  financial 
officer,  respectively),  and  concluded  that  our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as  defined  in  Rule  13a-15(e)  or  Rule 
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the “Exchange Act”) were effective as of June 30, 2023 and 
designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act 

83

is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that it is 
accumulated  and  communicated  to  our  management,  including  our  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  to 
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS

Our  management,  including  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  does  not  expect  that  our  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  or  our  internal  controls  will  prevent  or  detect  all  errors  and  all  fraud.  A  control  system,  no 
matter  how  well  designed  and  operated,  can  provide  only  reasonable,  not  absolute,  assurance  that  the  control  system’s 
objectives  will  be  met.  The  design  of  any  system  of  controls  is  based  in  part  on  certain  assumptions  about  the  likelihood  of 
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future 
conditions.

(c) MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under
the  supervision  of  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  management  conducted  an  assessment  of  the 
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2023 based on the framework in Internal Control - 
Integrated  Framework  (2013)  published  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission.  As  a 
result of this assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 
2023. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2023 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an 
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report.

(d) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the  Exchange  Act)  during  the  fourth  quarter  of  fiscal  2023  identified  in  connection  with  our  Chief  Executive  Officer’s  and 
Chief  Financial  Officer’s  evaluation  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  our  internal 
control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2023 Annual 
Meeting of Shareholders (the “Shareholders Meeting”), except that information required by this item concerning our executive 
officers appears in Part I, Item 4.1. of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Shareholders Meeting.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND 
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The  information  required  by  this  item  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  our  Proxy  Statement  for  the  Shareholders 

Meeting.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR 
INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement for the Shareholders 

Meeting.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Our independent registered public accounting firm is KPMG LLP, Boston, MA, Auditor Firm ID:185

The  information  required  by  this  item  is  incorporated  herein  by  reference  to  our  Proxy  Statement  for  the  Shareholders 

Meeting.

84

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS

PART IV

The financial statements, schedule, and exhibits listed below are included in or incorporated by reference as part of this 

report:

1. Financial statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023 and July 1, 2022

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 
1, 2022, and July 2, 2021

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022, and July 2, 2021 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2023, July 1, 2022, and July 2, 2021

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Financial Statement Schedule:

II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 ITEM 16.  

FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

85

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2023, JULY 1, 2022, and JULY 2, 2021
(In thousands)

Allowance for Credit Losses

BALANCE
AT
BEGINNING
OF PERIOD

ADDITIONS

REVERSALS

WRITE-
OFFS

BALANCE
AT END OF
PERIOD

$ 

$ 

$ 

2,074  $ 

1,720  $ 

1,451  $ 

408  $ 

530  $ 

514  $ 

15  $ 

151  $ 

199  $ 

1,132  $ 

25  $ 

46  $ 

1,335 

2,074 

1,720 

Deferred Tax Asset Valuation 
Allowance 

BALANCE
AT
BEGINNING
OF PERIOD

CHARGED
TO COSTS &
EXPENSES

CHARGED
TO OTHER
ACCOUNTS

DEDUCTIONS

BALANCE
AT END OF
PERIOD

$ 

$ 

$ 

15,349  $ 

15,257  $ 

11,264  $ 

906  $ 

1,232  $ 

2,035  $ 

(1,470)  $ 

(1,140)  $ 

1,958  $ 

—  $ 

—  $ 

—  $ 

14,785 

15,349 

15,257 

2023

2022

2021

2023

2022

2021

3.

Exhibits:

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index on page 88, which is incorporated herein

by reference.

86

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused 
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Andover, Massachusetts, on August 15, 
2023.

Signatures

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.

By

/s/    DAVID E. FARNSWORTH

David E. Farnsworth
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AND 
TREASURER
[PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER]

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following 

persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

/s/    WILLIAM L. BALLHAUS 
William L. Ballhaus

/S/    DAVID E. FARNSWORTH
David E. Farnsworth

/S/    MICHELLE M. MCCARTHY
Michelle M. McCarthy

/S/    WILLIAM K. O'BRIEN
William K. O'Brien

/S/    ORLANDO P. CARVALHO
Orlando P. Carvalho

/S/    GERARD J. DEMURO
Gerard J. DeMuro

/S/    LISA S. DISBROW
Lisa S. Disbrow

/S/    MARY LOUISE KRAKAUER
Mary Louise Krakauer

/S/    ROGER A. KRONE
Roger A. Krone

/S/    HOWARD L. LANCE
Howard L. Lance

/S/    BARRY R. NEARHOS
Barry R. Nearhos

/S/    SCOTT OSTFELD 
Scott Ostfeld

/S/    DEBORA A. PLUNKETT
Debora A. Plunkett

Title(s)
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 
(principal executive officer)

Date

August 15, 2023

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial 
Officer, and Treasurer (principal financial officer)

August 15, 2023

Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer 
(principal accounting officer)

August 15, 2023

Chairman of the Board of Directors

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

August 15, 2023

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

87

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

EXHIBIT INDEX  

3.1.1 

3.1.2 

3.1.3 

3.1.4 

3.1.5 

3.1.6 

3.2 

4.1 

4.2 

10.1* 

10.2* 

Articles of Organization (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 of the Company’s annual report 
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009) 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1.2 of the Company’s annual report on 
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010) 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 of the Company’s registration 
statement on Form 8-A filed on December 15, 2005) 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's current report on 
Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2012) 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's current report on 
Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2015) 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s current report on 
Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2021) 

Bylaws, amended and restated, effective as of October 26, 2022 (incorporated herein by reference to 
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2022) 

Form of Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Registration 
Statement on Form S-1/A filed on January 7, 1998) 

Description of Registrant's Securities (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s 
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3, 2020) 

1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 
10.1 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2022) 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of its current directors (incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 
June 30, 2009) 

10.3*† 

2018 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated 

10.4.1* 

10.4.2* 

10.4.3* 

10.4.4* 

10.4.5* 

10.5* 

Form of Stock Option Agreement under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to 
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019) 

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by 
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 
2019) 

Form of Deferred Stock Award Agreement under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by 
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 
2019) 

Form of Stock Option Agreement for performance stock options under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on 
September 28, 2007) 

Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the 
quarter ended March 31, 2019) 

Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement between the Company and Non-CEO Executives 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9.2 of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the 
fiscal year ended June 30, 2011) 

88 

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

10.6† 

Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors 

10.7.1 

10.7.2 

10.7.3 

10.7.4 

10.8* 

10.10* 

10.11* 

10.12* 

10.13 

19.1† 

21.1† 

23.1† 

31.1† 

31.2† 

32.1† 

Credit Agreement, dated May 2, 2016, among the Company, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders 
party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to 
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2016) 

Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated June 27, 2017, among the Company, the Guarantors party 
thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2017) 

Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated September 28, 2018, among the Company, the Guarantors 
party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on 
October 1, 2018)  

Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, dated February 28, 2022, among the Company, the Guarantors 
party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on 
February 28, 2022) 

Form of Severance Benefits Agreement between the Company and Non-CEO Executives (incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 
ended June 30, 2019) 

Letter Agreement, dated June 20, 2023, between the Company and David E. Farnsworth (incorporated 
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on June 29, 2023) 

Letter Agreement, dated September 15, 2021, between the Company and James M. Stevison (incorporated 
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s quarterly report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 
2022) 

Letter Agreement, dated September 17, 2021, between the Company and Charles R. Wells, IV 
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s quarterly report for the fiscal quarter ended 
September 30, 2022) 

Voting Agreement, dated July 6, 2023, by and between Mercury Systems, Inc. and JANA     Partners LLC 
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on 
July 6, 2023) 

Insider Trading Policy 

Subsidiaries of the Company 

Consent of KPMG LLP 

Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act of 2002 

Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 
of 2002 

Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

89

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

101† 

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet, 
(ii) Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity,
(iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

101.INS

eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) Instance Document - the instance document does not 
appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document 

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document 

104 

Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) 

Identifies a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which an executive officer or director of the 
Company participates.

Filed with this Form 10-K.

Furnished herewith. This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be incorporated by reference into any filing under the 
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

*

†

+

90

90

EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, William L. Ballhaus, certify that: 

CERTIFICATION 

1.

2.

3.

4.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury Systems, Inc.;

Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods
presented in this report;

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be
designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the
registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  registrant’s  fourth  fiscal  quarter  in  the  case  of  an  annual  report)  that  has
materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;
and

5.

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting,  to  the  registrant’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the  registrant’s  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the

registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2023

/s/     WILLIAM L. BALLHAUS

William L. Ballhaus

 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
[PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER]

EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, David E. Farnsworth, certify that: 

CERTIFICATION 

1.

2.

3.

4.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury Systems, Inc.;

Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue  statement  of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods
presented in this report;

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  to  be
designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the
registrant’s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  (the  registrant’s  fourth  fiscal  quarter  in  the  case  of  an  annual  report)  that  has
materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;
and

5.

The  registrant’s  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting,  to  the  registrant’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the  registrant’s  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the

registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2023 

/s/     DAVID E. FARNSWORTH 
David E. Farnsworth

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AND TREASURER
[PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER]

 
EXHIBIT 32.1 

Mercury Systems, Inc. 

Certification Pursuant To 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
As Adopted Pursuant To 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mercury Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 
30,  2023  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  “Report”),  we,  William  L.  Ballhaus,  President  and  Chief 
Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  and  David  Farnsworth,  Executive  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  and  Treasurer  of  the 
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  Section  1350  of  Chapter  63  of  Title  18,  United  States  Code,  that  to  our  knowledge  the  Report  fully 
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the 
information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the 
Company. 

Date: August 15, 2023

/S/    WILLIAM L. BALLHAUS

William L. Ballhaus
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

/S/    DAVID E. FARNSWORTH

David E. Farnsworth
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT,
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AND TREASURER

Cumulative Total Return  

The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return on our common stock 
through June 30, 2023 to: (i) the Spade Defense Index and (ii) a peer group of 21 companies. The 
graph and table assume that $100 was invested at the beginning of the period in each of our 
common stock, the Spade Defense Index, and a peer group and that dividends, if any, were 
reinvested. The comparisons in the graph are required by the SEC, based upon historical data, 
and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance our of common 
stock. The peer group consists of the following companies:  

3D Systems Corporation  
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.  
AeroVironment, Inc.  
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.  
Belden Inc.  
BWX Technologies, Inc.  
Curtiss-Wright Corporation  

Diodes Incorporated  
FormFactor, Inc.  
Infinera Corporation  
iRobot Corporation  
Kaman Corporation  
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.  
Leonardo DRS, Inc.  
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. 

Novanta Inc. 
Onto Innovation Inc. 
OSI Systems, Inc. 
RBC Bearings Incorporated 
Rogers Corporation  
Viasat, Inc. 

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return Among  
Mercury Systems, Inc., the Spade Defense Index, and the Peer Group 

MRCY

DXS‐USA

Peer Group

250.0

200.0

150.0

100.0

50.0

‐

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Measurement Point  Mercury Systems, Inc. 

6/29/2018 
6/28/2019 
7/2/2020 
7/2/2021 
7/1/2022 
6/30/2023 

100.00 
184.8 
210.9 
173.4 
168.2 
90.9 

Spade Defense Index  
100.00 
118.2 
101.3 
138.4 
129.8 
154.9 

Peer Group 
100.00 
109.7 
113.9 
177.2 
142.0 
218.4 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

DIRECTORS & MANAGEMENT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

William L. Ballhaus 
President and  
Chief Executive Officer

Christopher C. Cambria 
Executive Vice President,  
General Counsel  
and Secretary

Allen Couture  
Executive Vice President,  
Execution Excellence

David E. Farnsworth 
Executive Vice President,  
Chief Financial Officer  
and Treasurer

Christine Fox Harbison 
Executive Vice President  
and Chief Growth Officer

James M. Stevison 
Executive Vice President  
and President,  
Mission Systems

Charles R. Wells, IV 
Executive Vice President and  
President, Microelectronics

William K. O’Brien 
Chairman of the Board, 
Former Chairman and CEO, 
Enterasys Networks

William L. Ballhaus 
President and  
Chief Executive Officer 
Mercury Systems, Inc. 

Orlando P. Carvalho 
Former Executive Vice President 
Aeronautics, Lockheed Martin

Gerard J. DeMuro 
Co-CEO, Eve Air Mobility

Lisa S. Disbrow 
Under Secretary 
of the U.S. Air Force (Retired)

Mary Louise Krakauer 
Former Executive, 
Dell and EMC

Roger A. Krone 
Former Chairman  
and CEO, Leidos

Howard L. Lance 
Former President and CEO, 
Maxar Technologies, Inc. 
and Harris Corporation

Barry R. Nearhos 
Former Managing Partner, 
PricewaterhouseCoopers

Scott Ostfeld 
Managing Partner and  
Portfolio Manager,  
JANA Partners

Debora A. Plunkett 
Federal Senior Executive,  
National Security Agency (Retired)

CORPORATE OFFICE

MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC. 
50 Minuteman Road 
Andover, MA 01810 
978.256.1300     866.627.6951 
ir.mrcy.com    NASDAQ: MRCY

AUDITOR

KPMG LLP 
Two Financial Center 
60 South Street  
Boston, MA 02111

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

Computershare Investor Services 
P.O. Box 43006 
Providence, RI 02940-3078 
877.373.6374 
computershare.com/investor 

COMMON STOCK

Mercury Systems, Inc., common stock  
is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select  
Market under the symbol MRCY.

STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION

The Company’s Form 10-K and other  
published information is available on  
request, free of charge, by writing or  
calling Investor Relations as listed below.

INVESTOR RELATIONS

Mercury Systems, Inc. 
50 Minuteman Road   
Andover, MA 01810 
866.411.MRCY

Mercury Systems, Inc., is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. Copyright © 2023 Mercury Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. The Mercury  
Systems logo and the following are trademarks or registered trademarks of Mercury Systems, Inc.: Mercury Systems, Innovation that matters.  
Other marks used herein may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Mercury believes this information is accurate  
as of its publication date and is not responsible for any inadvertent errors. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.    

Bill Ballhaus portrait courtesy of 22Gates Photography.

THE MERCURY PROCESSING PLATFORM

The end-to-end processing power that serves  
the most critical A&D missions.

                       M A C R O   T H E MES

OUR CUSTOMERS

D A T

Sensor Processing

Mission Compute

A   T

O   D E C I S I O N
S I L I C O N   TO SYSTEM
                  Display                    C
rity                    S i g

S

a l

n

o

m

Defense System 
Pioneers

 Mission Ready

u
c
e
S

PROCESSING 

        Trusted & Secure

p

u

t

e

Avionics 
Visionaries

Software Defined

Command & Control

S

t

o

r

a

g

e                    Network i n g                     Software 

Communication

      Open & Modular

New Technology 
Futurists

Technological
Superiority

Global
Alliances

Strategic
Domains

Security &
Resilience

Affordability &
Futureproofing

MERCURY SYSTEMS – INNOVATION THAT MATTERS®
Mercury Systems is a technology company that pushes processing power to the tactical edge, making the latest commercial 
technologies profoundly more accessible for today’s most challenging aerospace and defense missions. From silicon to system 
scale, Mercury enables customers to accelerate innovation and turn data into decision superiority. Mercury is headquartered in 
Andover, Massachusetts, and has 24 locations worldwide.

mrcy.com