Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Grocery Stores / North West Co. Fund

North West Co. Fund

nwf.un · TSX Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker nwf.un
Exchange TSX
Sector Communication Services
Industry Grocery Stores
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2012 Annual Report · North West Co. Fund
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
More in Store 

THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012

Annual Report

   
Financial Highlights

All currency figures in this report are in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted

($ in thousands, except per share information)
RESULTS FOR THE YEAR

Sales

Same store sales % increase (2) 

Trading profit (3) (EBITDA)

Earnings from operations (3) (EBIT)

Net earnings

Cash flow from operating activities

FINANCIAL POSITION

Total assets

Total debt

Total equity

FINANCIAL RATIOS

Debt-to-equity

Return on net assets (3) (RONA)

Return on average equity (3) (ROE)

Sales blend:  Food

General Merchandise

Other

PER SHARE ($) - DILUTED (4)
Trading profit (3)  (EBITDA)
Net earnings
Cash flow from operating activities

Market price:   January 31

high
low

Year Ended
January 31, 2013

Year Ended
January 31, 2012

Year Ended
January 31, 2011

$

$

$

$

1,513,646

0.5%   

134,267

97,118

65,148

128,992

651,394

163,354

296,250

.55:1

20.7%

22.5%

76.8%

19.5%

3.7%

2.76
1.34
2.66

23.14
23.88
19.34

$

$

$

$

1,495,136

3.3%

125,881

89,309

57,961

115,469

626,917

175,892

283,709

.62:1

18.5%

20.1%

76.4%

20.2%

3.4%

2.59
1.19
2.38

19.40
22.50
17.85

$

$

$

$

1,448,104

2.7%

125,764

90,272

69,656

114.564

616,588

192,596

286,475

.67:1

17.9%

24.1%

76.4%

20.3%

3.3%

2.59
1.44
2.36

21.09
23.00
17.02

(1)  2012 and 2011 are reported in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).  2010 has been restated to IFRS.  All other historical financial 

information was prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (CGAAP) and has not been restated to IFRS.

(2)  Same store sales, excluding the foreign exchange impact.
(3)  See Non-GAAP financial measures section on page 26
(4)  Effective January 1, 2011, North West Company Fund converted to a share corporation called The North West Company Inc. The comparative information refers 

to the units of the Fund.  See conversion to a share corporation on page 8 for further information. 

THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012

Annual Report 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Management's Discussion & Analysis
Forward-Looking Statements .......................................................................................................................

President & CEO Message ...............................................................................................................................

Chairman's Message ..........................................................................................................................................

Our Business Today and Vision .....................................................................................................................

Principles and Strategies .................................................................................................................................

Key Performance Drivers and Capabilities to Deliver Results  ....................................................

Conversion to a Share Corporation  ...........................................................................................................

Consolidated Results  .........................................................................................................................................

Canadian Operations Financial Performance ......................................................................................

International Operations Financial Performance ..............................................................................

Consolidated Liquidity and Capital Resources  ...................................................................................

Quarterly Financial Information ..................................................................................................................

Disclosure Controls  .............................................................................................................................................

Internal Controls over Financial Reporting  ...........................................................................................

Outlook ......................................................................................................................................................................

Risk Management  ................................................................................................................................................

Critical Accounting Estimates  .......................................................................................................................

Future Accounting Standards ......................................................................................................................

Non-GAAP Financial Measures  ....................................................................................................................

Glossary of Terms  .................................................................................................................................................

Eleven-Year Financial Summary  ..................................................................................................................

Consolidated Financial Statements

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements ...............................................................

Independent Auditor’s Report .....................................................................................................................

Consolidated Balance Sheets .......................................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Earnings .....................................................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ...................................................................

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity .................................................

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ......................................................................................

Shareholder Information  ............................................................................................................................

Corporate Governance  .................................................................................................................................

2
3

4

5

6

8

8

9

11

13

14

18

19

19

19

20

23

25

26

27

28

30

30

31

32

32

33

34

35
56
57

   
Unless  otherwise  stated,  this  Management's  Discussion  &  Analysis 
(“MD&A”) for The North West Company Inc. (“NWC”) or its predecessor 
North  West  Company  Fund  (“NWF”  or “Fund”)  and  its  subsidiaries 
(collectively, “North West Company”, the “Company”, “North West”, or  
“NWC”) is based on, and should be read in conjunction with the 2012 
annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying 
notes.  The  Company's  annual  audited  consolidated 
financial 
statements and accompanying notes for the year ended January 31, 
2013 are in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated, and 
are  prepared  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting 
Standards (“IFRS”). 

Due  to  the  transition  to  IFRS,  comparative  figures  for  the  year 
ended January 31, 2011 (“2010”) that were previously reported in the 
consolidated  financial  statements  prepared  in  accordance  with 
Canadian  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“CGAAP”)  have 
been restated to conform with the accounting policies and financial 
statement presentation adopted under IFRS. The financial information 
for the fiscal years 2009 and prior was prepared in accordance with 
CGAAP and has not been restated. Further information on the transition 
to  IFRS  and  the  impact  on  the  Company's  consolidated  financial 
statements is provided in the 2011 Annual Financial Report available 
on  SEDAR  at  www.sedar.com  or  on  the  Company's  website  at 
www.northwest.ca.

The  Board  of  Directors,  on  the  recommendation  of  its  Audit 
Committee, approved the contents of this MD&A on April 8, 2013 and 
the  information  contained  in  this  MD&A  is  current  to  April  8,  2013, 
unless otherwise stated.         

Forward-Looking Statements 
This  MD&A  contains  forward-looking  statements  about  North West 
including  its  business  operations,  strategy  and  expected  financial 
performance  and  condition.  Forward-looking  statements  include 
statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future 
events or conditions, or include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”,  
“plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, “intends”, “targets”, “projects”, “forecasts” or 
negative versions thereof and other similar expressions, or future or 
conditional  future  financial  performance  (including  sales,  earnings, 
growth rates, dividends, debt levels, financial capacity, access to capital, 
and liquidity), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible 
future action by the Company, are also forward-looking statements. 
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and 
projections about future events and are inherently subject to, among 
other things, risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the Company, 
economic  factors  and  the  retail  industry  in  general.  They  are  not 
guarantees of future performance, and actual events and results could 
differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking 
statements made by the Company due to, but not limited to, important 
factors such as general economic, political and market factors in North 
America  and  internationally,  interest  and  foreign  exchange  rates, 
changes in accounting policies and methods used to report financial 
condition, including uncertainties associated with critical accounting 
assumptions and estimates, the effect of applying future accounting 
changes,  business  competition,  technological  change,  changes  in 
government  regulations  and 
laws, 
unexpected  judicial  or  regulatory  proceedings, catastrophic  events, 
the Company's ability to complete strategic transactions and integrate 
acquisitions and the Company's success in anticipating and managing 
the foregoing risks. The reader is cautioned that the foregoing list of 
important factors is not exhaustive.  Other risks are outlined in the Risk 
Management section of this MD&A and in the Risk Factors sections of 
the Annual Information Form. The reader is also cautioned to consider 
these  and  other  factors  carefully  and  not  place  undue  reliance  on 
forward-looking  statements.  Other  than  as  specifically  required  by 
applicable law, the Company has no specific intention to update any 
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, 
future events or otherwise.   

legislation,  changes 

in  tax 

Additional information on the Company, including  our Annual 
Information Form, can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or on the 
Company's website at www.northwest.ca.

2THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012  
"More in Store" will extend beyond the four walls of our stores to 
our broader advantage of delivering products and services to hard-to-
reach markets. One example is financial services.

Like all our strategies, we view financial services through a lens 
that applies our local insight and execution skills to create solutions. In 
alliance  with  new  partners,  we've  created  a  unique  "WE  Financial” 
prepaid  VISA  card  launching  in  the  second  quarter  to  provide 
customers with expanded financial access to the world around them. 
In summary, North West has a tradition of stability and consistency 
helped by, but not dependent on, favourable economic conditions. I 
remain  optimistic  about  our  participation  in  the  development 
potential  of  the  North, Western Canada  and  the  island  markets  we 
serve. I am equally confident in our ability to continue creating and 
sustaining ideas tailored to our unique geographic presence and the 
"More in Store" operating strengths we've worked hard to build.

Edward S. Kennedy
President & CEO
April 8, 2013

2012 President & CEO Message

I am pleased to report  that North West delivered growth in trading 
profit and earnings in 2012. This gain is the outcome of a sustainable 
roadmap  to  improved  operating  practices,  driving  down  costs  and 
offering our customers more for less. 

We accomplished this while making progress on our performance 
improvement initiatives in our Cost-U-Less (CUL) and Giant Tiger (GT) 
divisions  and  developing  new  products  in  our  financial  services 
business. The credit goes to our people: their utmost commitment and 
hard work made the difference that mattered to our customers and 
ultimately, our year-end results.

Last year we made promises to deliver on the More Growth in Store 
strategies that we planned, tested and rolled out. 2012 was the year 
for  results.  Several  initiatives  rose  to  this  challenge  and  deserve 
mention, starting with our perishable category performance. 

Efficiency gains in our largest perishable categories continued to 
exceed expectations and demonstrated that even in our most remote, 
highest-cost stores, product waste and spoilage can be minimized. 

Similarly, we proved that in-stock rates well over 90% can still be 
achieved in stores 1,000 miles from the nearest road, with deliveries 
only  by  air  and  water.  Remaining  committed,  we  maintained  our 
advantage by being ready for business.

By year end, we had completed development of a system to track 
and trace everything we move across our vast geography, whether by 
road,  rail,  air,  ship,  barge  or  local  handler.  Once  fully  deployed  by 
mid-2013, this will be another first for our customers and a tremendous 
asset to help maximize supply chain productivity. 

Finally, we continued to build the strength of our front line people. 
A  record  number  of  new  managers  graduated  from  our  training 
programs and were successfully placed in rewarding roles, ready to 
fully  contribute  from  day  one.  Staff  housing  upgrades  remained  a 
priority to ensure that we have a complete, superior package of job 
benefits for some of the most important positions in our company. 

While  we've  executed well  on  delivering  More Growth in Store, 
several of  our  CUL  stores faced  a  further  deterioration  in  economic 
conditions,  most  notably  the  U.S.  Virgin 
Islands  where  high 
unemployment, margin pressures and rising utility costs impacted our 
performance. In response, we shifted to lower price points and new 
import  and  opportunity  buys  to  bring  our  customers  better  value. 
While we expect economic conditions to remain challenging, we are 
confident that our sharper focus on food will improve performance in 
2013. 

Our priority at GT last year was to re-commit to execution, which 
fit well with our More Growth in Store strategy and was equally driven 
by  competitive  pressures  and  performance  shortcomings.  True  to 
beginning  our  GT  venture 11  years  ago, we  still  believe  that  urban 
neighbourhoods  and  small  towns  are  attractive  niche  markets 
underserved by big-box names, and on that basis we've built a leading 
junior discount position across the Canadian Prairies. Given the recent 
significant  investment  in  urban  retail  space  by  larger  competitors, 
especially within the discount segment, holding sales will be a priority 
for GT in 2013. We will continue to use our local advantage to pursue 
unique product opportunities while closing controllable performance 
gaps to compete and win.

In 2012, we benefited from what we've learned after three years 
of  running  a  tighter,  execution-driven  business.    More  in  Store 
represents  the  momentum  and  the  possibilities  we've  created  by 
digging deeper into how we work and how we can be an even more 
relevant  and  trusted  provider  of  food  and  everyday  products  and 
services for our customers. One finding leads to another, creating new 
energy and confidence in our potential. 

3ANNUAL REPORT     
     
     
   
  
2012 Chairman's Message

2012  was  a  satisfying  year  that  delivered  much  of  the  promised 
performance embedded in More Growth in Store. Trading profit grew 
again  to  a  record  $134.3  million  and  return  on  equity  increased  to 
22.5%, while investor returns remained within top quartile ranges at 
25.1% for the year.

These  results  were  accomplished  amidst  continued  global 
economic instability and lower public and private investment within 
most  North West  markets.  Business  conditions  demanded  the  very 
focus that the Company has been committed to for the past three years: 
efficiency  gains  leading  to  lower  costs  and  better  prices  to  help 
improve our customers' quality of life. 

At  the  Board  level,  it  was  gratifying  to  see  the  output  of 
management's work and the resulting rewards from staying a course 
that emphasized “middle line” improvement while keeping an eye on 
top-line  growth  ideas.  Throughout  the  year,  the  energy  of  our 
associates,  from  store  staff  to  office  support  and  our  distribution 
centres,  was  impressive.  More  Growth  in  Store  is  really  about  this 
collective ability to innovate, adapt and achieve. 

The Board's work in 2012 ran parallel to the Company's emphasis 
on  refining  execution.    Previous  governance  priorities  centered  on 
Board  renewal  and  ensuring  that  management  planning,  risk 
management and incentive practices were effective and aligned.  With 
this  in  place,  attention  shifted  to  oversight  and  building  a  highly-
cohesive, dynamic Board that fully leverages the skills  of our newer 
members.  I am pleased to report that on both counts, the progress 
was noteworthy and met the high standards of effective governance 
set by prior Boards.  

2013 will be another important  year for North West and Board 
activity.  Attention will continue to focus on operational excellence and 
further  gains  despite  forecasts  of  ongoing  economic  uncertainty.  
Significant  time  will  also  be  invested  in  assessing  a  wider  range  of 
strategic options that can renew the Company's growth over the next 
five years and beyond.

Both the Board and the Company's management team have the 
insight and experience for the task at hand.  This will be stimulating 
and rewarding work that holds tremendous potential for serving our 
customers in new ways, leading to new opportunities and setting the 
stage for far More in Store at North West.  

H. Sanford Riley
Chairman, Board of Directors
April 8, 2013

4THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012  
Management's 
Discussion &
Analysis

OUR BUSINESS TODAY

The  North West Company  is  a  leading  retailer  to  underserved  rural 
communities  and  urban  neighbourhood  markets  in  the  following 
regions:  northern  Canada,  western  Canada,  rural  Alaska,  the  South 
Pacific islands and the Caribbean.  Our stores offer a broad range of 
products and services with an emphasis on food. Our value offer is to 
be the best local shopping choice for everyday household and local 
lifestyle needs.

North West's core strengths include: our ability to adapt to varied 
local values and priorities to forge community partnerships; our on-
the-ground  presence  with  hard-to-replicate  skills, 
insights  and 
facilities; our logistics expertise in moving product to, and operating 
stores within, remote or difficult-to-reach markets; and our ability to 
apply these strengths within complementary niche businesses.

North West has a rich enterprising legacy as one of the longest 
continuing retail enterprises in the world. The Company traces its roots 
back to 1668 with many of our store locations in northern Canada and 
Alaska  having  been  in  operation  for  over  200  years.  Today  these 
northern stores serve communities with populations from 500 to 8,000. 
A typical store is 7,500 square feet in size and offers food, family apparel, 
housewares, appliances, outdoor products and services such as fuel, 
post offices, pharmacies, income tax return preparation, quick-service 
prepared  food,  commercial  business  sales,  prepaid  card  products, 
ATMs, cheque cashing and propriety credit programs.

Growth at North West has come from market  share expansion 
within  existing  locations  and  from  applying  our  expertise  and 
infrastructure  to  new  markets  and  complementary  businesses. The 
latter includes wholesaling to independent stores, opening Giant Tiger 
junior  discount 
rural  communities  and  urban 
neighbourhoods in western Canada, and our late 2007 acquisition of 
Cost-U-Less, Inc., a chain of mid-sized warehouse format stores serving 
the South Pacific islands and the Caribbean.

stores 

in 

A key strength and ongoing strategy of North West is to adapt to 
unique local lifestyles and cultures, and capture selling opportunities 
better  than  our  competition.  Store  development  flexibility,  store 
management  selection  and  education,  store-level  merchandise 
ordering, community relations and enterprising incentive plans are all 
ingredients of the model we have built to support this leading market 
position.  We  believe  that  continued,  efficient  enhancement  of  our 
execution skills in general, and our logistics and selling skills specifically, 
are essential components in to meeting customer needs within each 
market we serve.

North  West  delivers  its  products  and  services  through  the 
following retail banners and wholesale businesses, in two reporting 
segments:

Canadian Operations

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 
• 

• 

• 

• 

121 Northern stores, offering a combination of food, financial 
services and general merchandise to remote northern Canadian 
communities;
31  Giant  Tiger  ("GT")  junior  discount  stores,  offering  family 
fashion, household products and food to urban neighbourhoods 
and larger rural centers in western Canada;
7 NorthMart stores, targeted at larger northern markets with an 
emphasis on an expanded selection of fresh foods, fashion and 
health products and services;
13 Quickstop convenience stores, offering ready-to-eat  foods, 
fuel and related services; 
1  Valu  Lots  discount  center  and  direct-to-customer  food 
distribution outlet for remote communities in Canada; 
1 Solo Market store, targeted at less remote, rural markets; 
1  NorthMart  Drug  Store,  a  stand-alone  pharmacy  and 
convenience store combination; 
Crescent Multi Foods ("CMF"), a distributor of produce and fresh 
meats to independent grocery stores in Saskatchewan, Manitoba 
and northwestern Ontario;
2 North West Company Fur Marketing outlets, trading in furs 
and  offering  Aboriginal  handicrafts  and  authentic  Canadian 
heritage products; and 
The Inuit Art Marketing Service, Canada's largest distributor of 
Inuit art.

International Operations 

• 

• 
• 

• 

• 

30  AC  Value  Centers  ("AC"),  stores  similar  to  Northern  and 
NorthMart,  offering  a  combination  of  food  and  general 
merchandise to communities across remote and rural regions of 
Alaska;
3 Quickstop convenience stores within rural Alaska; 
Pacific  Alaska  Wholesale  ("PAW"),  a  leading  distributor  to 
independent grocery  stores and individual households in rural 
Alaska; 
13  Cost-U-Less  (CUL),  mid-sized  warehouse  stores,  offering 
discount  food  and  general  merchandise  products  to  island 
communities in the South Pacific and the Caribbean; and
1  Island  Fresh  Supermarket,  neighborhood  store  in  Guam 
offering convenience with an emphasis on fresh and prepared 
foods.  

VISION

At North West our mission is to be a trusted provider of goods and 
services  within  hard-to-reach,  underserved  and  less  developed 
markets. Our vision is to bring products and services to communities 
that  help  people  live  better.  At  the  retail  level,  this  starts  with  our 
customers'  ability  and  desire  to  shop  locally  with  us  for  the  widest 
possible  range  of  products  and  services  that  meet  their  everyday 
needs. We do  this  by  being  more  accessible  and  convenient, more 
locally adaptable, friendlier and having the lowest local cost, enabled 
by  lean,  innovative  processes.  For  our  associates,  we  want  to  be  a 
preferred, fulfilling place to work. For our investors, we want to deliver 
superior, top-quartile total returns over the long term.

5ANNUAL REPORT      
                                                                                           
 
 
PRINCIPLES

The  way  we  work  at  North  West  is  shaped  by  six  core  principles: 
Customer  Driven,    Enterprising,    Passion,    Accountability,    Trust,  and 
Personal Balance. 

Customer Driven is our practice of always looking through the eyes 
of our customers while recognizing our local presence as a supportive 
community citizen.
Enterprising  is  our  spirit  of  innovation,  improvement  and  growth, 
reflected in our unrelenting focus on new and better products, services 
and processes. 
Passion  refers  to  our  connection  to  our  work,  our  privileged  local 
market  presence and the opportunity  to find solutions that make a 
difference in peoples' lives.
Accountability is our management approach to getting work done 
through effective roles, tasks and resources.
Trust  at  North  West  means  doing  what  you  say  you  will  do,  with 
fairness, integrity and respect.
Personal Balance is our commitment to sustaining ourselves and our 
organization,  so  that  we  work  effectively  for  our  customers  and 
communities over the long term.

STRATEGIES

The strategies at North West are aligned with a total return approach 
to  investment  performance.  We  aim  to  deliver  top  quartile  returns 
through  an  equal  emphasis  on  growth  and  income  yield  with 
opportunities considered in terms of their growth potential and ability 
to sustain an attractive cash return. 

The Company's long-range plans (“LRP”) are developed in multi-
year cycles and are reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis or as 
required at the senior management and board levels. 2009 was the 
start  of  a  LRP  cycle  and  included  an  in-depth  assessment  of  North 
West's  past  performance,  opportunity  gaps  within  each  business 
segment, and new business growth potential. 

The strategic rationale for this approach fully considered our past 
successes and unrealized opportunities. Over the previous cycle, food 
market share and margin rates had increased through better sourcing 
and  through  more  store-branded  products  that  offered  a  value 
alternative  to  national  brands.  Our  food  growth  strategy  was 
augmented  by  opportunistically  pursuing  complimentary  everyday 
products and services. These included financial services, post offices, 
retail gas  bars  and  pharmacies.  New  store growth was  achieved  by 
acquiring independent stores in northern Canada and Alaska, through 
Giant  Tiger  store  expansion  in  western  Canada  and  through  our 
acquisition of CUL in late 2007. 

These  initiatives  developed  the  business  beyond  our  core 
northern  markets  and  merchandise  mix  but  also  stretched  our 
resources  and  executive  attention. The  effect  was  that  other,  high 
potential operational elements within the “four walls” of our business 
were  left  without  the  necessary  degree  of  focus,  investment  and 
leadership.  

As  a  result  of  our  2009  LRP  work,  we  identified  operational 
excellence as the first priority within our existing retail network, themed 
as "More Growth in Store". This finding and subsequent direction-setting 
is based on gaps that we see within our current store base which, if 
effectively addressed, would deliver attractive financial returns over the 
next three to five years and set the foundation for new market, product 
and service growth over the long term. 

The  specific  areas  we  have  highlighted  for  attention  further 
protect,  grow  and  optimize  the  performance  of  our  food  business, 
which accounts for 77% of our sales base, the stability of our store 
teams, and the strength of our supply chain. 

In  addition  to  our “More  Growth  in  Store”  emphasis,  NWC  will 
complete  an  in-depth  strategy  assessment  in  2013  to  determine 
possible work directions over the following three to five years. Beyond 
the medium term potential of existing initiatives our scope will include 
the health and future of our general merchandise business, new market 
growth  and  complimentary  business  opportunities. We  expect  this 
work  to be  substantially  completed by December  2013.  Across this 
work we continue to emphasize new ideas, clear principles, execution, 
and the ability to track performance and we will carefully assess the 
long-term potential of any major new business, product or service, and 
the  probability  of  achieving  threshold returns  on  a  sustainable  and 
consistent basis. 

Following is an update on the More Growth in Store strategic initiatives: 

Initiative #1
Improve perishable food performance gaps
This initiative is a comprehensive reworking of products, processes and 
technology required to improve the performance of categories that 
attract  higher  activity  costs  and  require  more  complex  executions. 
These include Produce, Meat, Chilled, Frozen Food and Food Service.
Result
The  emphasis  in  2012  was  on  Produce  and  Fresh Meat  categories. 
Findings from this work were also applied to Commercial Bakery, Fuel 
and Tobacco with further gains in these latter categories expected in 
2013. The  key  drivers  continue  to  be  more  controlled  assortments, 
increased use of pre-packaged product, daily company-wide visibility 
on product waste, simplified ordering processes, enhanced inventory 
and  margin management  tools  and  training  certification  programs. 
After  a  slower  start  in  2011  because  of  the  shift  in  discipline  and 
attention that was required, 2012 moved at a faster, more productive 
pace. This is expected to continue into 2013 as new product categories 
are added. The financial impact has been very positive with Alaskan 
and northern Canada Produce and Fresh Meat gross profit dollars up 
26% or $11.0 million over the three years ending January 2013.  

Initiative #2
Optimize in-stock position
This priority is highlighted by the fact that 87% of our sales (excluding 
Giant Tiger) are in everyday consumable products that depend on a 
strong in-stock position. This initiative focuses on improving in-stock 
rates  through  technology-enabled  tracking  and  ordering  processes 
that were launched in the second half of 2010 and have been further 
refined by adjusting product space allocations. 
Result
In 2012, the average in-stock performance at our Alaskan and northern 
Canada stores improved by 470 basis points compared to the average 
in-stock  rate  in  2011.  During  the  year  we  also  implemented  the 
processes and tracking from our in-stock initiative in our Cost-U-Less 
stores which resulted in an 820 basis point improvement in their in-
stock  performance  over  2011.  Combined  with  a  wider  range  of 
products now being measured under this initiative, our average in-
stock rate has generated an estimated annualized sales gain of $9.0 
million or 1.1% of the food sales base of these divisions.  

In  2013, our in-stock work will be integrated into the everyday 
inventory focus at North West. Elements of our in-stock initiative will 
carry forward within new replenishment initiatives that build on the 
tracking capability of our Transportation Management System. 

6THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012  
Initiative #5
Build our supply chain advantage
North West is a major shipper of merchandise and other freight into 
the remote markets that we serve. This creates an opportunity to work 
more collaboratively with our transportation partners to fully leverage 
our knowledge and forecasted volumes. The outcomes we expect from 
this strategy are improved product visibility and delivery service within 
a more productive and lower cost integrated logistics network.   
Result
In 2012, $1.7 million in outbound freight savings and distribution centre 
efficiencies were achieved through improved routing and freight rates 
implementation  of 
across  our  supply  chain  network  and  the 
productivity  tools in  our Winnipeg Distribution  Centre. A  dedicated 
cross-functional  team  is  working  on  the  implementation  of  the  $7 
million, transportation management system (“TMS”). The deployment 
of TMS at North West will utilize 40% more functionality than typical 
TMS implementations which speaks to the complexity of our diverse 
network of freight modes and carriers. For outbound shipments the 
TMS solution required the development of a custom track and trace 
system, smart-labeling of all warehouse and cross dock merchandise, 
enhanced warehouse management systems to facilitate load building 
in one system and the ability for air carriers to plan, execute and provide 
shipment status updates on shipments processed at their hubs. 

We expect to have all phases of the project fully deployed by the 
third quarter of 2013 and estimate that, within 24 months following 
the roll-out, we will be able to further reduce our annual supply chain 
costs by approximately $5 million. The net savings from TMS will be 
strategically  reinvested  to  continue  to  bring  greater  value  to  our 
customers.

Initiative #6
Cascade our leadership principles into practices
We consider our leadership principles to be the foundation for great, 
sustainable  performance  across  all  levels  at  North  West.  From  our 
cashiers to our buyers and store managers, we recognize that effective 
management practices reflect these principles and align our work.     
Result
2012 started and ended with a focus on our store management levels. 
In the first half of the year our progress was slower than expected due 
to personnel changes within our Human Resources team including a 
vacancy at the Vice-President, Human Resources position for most of 
2012. CEO-led leadership sessions were a key part of our second half 
work and this will continue into 2013 assisted by the recruitment of a 
Vice-President,  Human  Resources  and  a  greater  time  commitment 
from the entire senior management team. 

Initiative #3
Ensure store teams stability
Within such a remote, diverse store network, our local skill and presence 
is a core advantage. Through our assessment, we identified a need to 
solidify our store teams so that they stay together longer in specific 
locations,  deepening  customer  and  community  relationships,  and 
building  their  business.  For  this  to  happen  consistently,  we  are 
revamping recruitment, retention and store work processes to ensure 
we  attract  and  retain  highly  capable,  thoroughly  trained  store 
personnel in key roles.  

This initiative specifically addresses the opportunity to optimize 
overall store performance by ensuring that a highly capable store team 
is in place within each store location for an average time of at least 
three years. Similar to other “More Growth in Store” work, 2012 was an 
important year for building momentum and putting in place proven 
methods to achieve desired stability levels.  
Result
In  2012,  a  record  number  of  managers  were  trained  and  placed  in 
rewarding  roles.  Our  search  for  talented  managers  takes  us  across 
Canada  and  the  international  markets  we  operate  in.  A  new 
recruitment platform was implemented in 2012 to reduce the time and 
cost  to  hire  candidates. The  movement  of  management  between 
stores to fill critical vacancies was a barrier to achievement of overall 
stability.  To  reduce  the  need  to  transfer  employees,  improved 
recruitment  planning  was  implemented,  store  level  succession 
planning was established and a pool of ready trained managers is being 
created. Our staff housing upgrade program, which provides a higher-
standard housing benefit for store personnel recruited into northern 
communities, included capital spending of $4.3 million in 2012. Work 
continued  on  success  profiles  for  all  store  manager  and  district 
manager positions at North West with the development of coaching 
guides and specific competency training to develop skills that are key 
drivers of success at North West. 

this 

Initiative #4
Be “priced right”
Better  price  management  is  a  strategic  opportunity  at  North  West, 
especially in our more remote banners. Market-based pricing is more 
difficult  due  to  limited  local  shopping  options  in  many  of  these 
locations,  and 
requires  a  deeper,  more  sophisticated 
understanding of true costs and purchase volumes relative to price. 
Result
2012  built  on  the  success  of  major  price  reductions  on  nutritious 
perishable  foods  qualifying  for  Nutrition  North  Canada  (“Nutrition 
North”) freight subsidies that took effect in 2011. Air freight routing 
changes in mid-2012 achieved a significant savings in transportation 
costs to Baffin Island. Similar to the Nutrition North price reductions, 
these savings were fully and transparently passed on in the form of 
price reductions on key volume items. 

Work  was  also  completed  across  all  food  categories  to  ensure 
correct "landed" costs and prices that reflected the optimal relationship 
between like items and between national and store brands. The net 
effect of this work was to improve both sales tonnage and margins. 

In  2013,  we  expect  to  find  further  efficiencies  that  can  further 
reduce our cost of business, helping our customers realize even more 
value for their dollar and attract more local shopping.

7ANNUAL REPORT 
KEY PERFORMANCE DRIVERS AND
CAPABILITIES REQUIRED TO DELIVER RESULTS 

The ability to protect and enhance the performance of northern 
store locations:  Our stores in Alaska and northern Canada represent 
the  highest  potential  for  improved  productivity  and  customer 
satisfaction.  We  believe  that  the  shift  in  our  culture  and  capability 
towards efficiency, innovation and operational excellence within our 
new LRP strategies is working and is the best path to achieve these 
goals. 

The  financial  capability  to  sustain  the  competitiveness  of  our 
existing  store  base  and  to  pursue  growth:    Our  sustaining 
investments include replacement and renovated stores, staff housing, 
energy-efficiency  and  technology.  Non-capital  expenditures  are 
centered on improvements to our in-store capabilities through more 
in-depth training programs and the on-going investment in our LRP 
work.

The ability to be a leading community store in every market we 
serve:  This depends on our ability to tailor our store formats, product/
service mix, community support and store associate employment offer, 
while still realizing the scale efficiencies of our size or the size of our 
alliance partners. A broad range of products, services and store sizes, 
combined with flexible technology platforms and “best practice” work 
processes, are all required to give us the ability to achieve this goal.

The  ability  to  successfully  add  new  stores  and  renew  existing 
store leases:    Our  new  store opening  success  depends  on  finding 
viable locations, communities that are interested in having our store 
services, willing sellers of independent stores or chains, and being able 
to integrate and accelerate their full contribution potential. Renewing 
store leases, especially when the landlord is a community development 
entity,  depends  on  our  track  record  of  solid  store  operations,  our 
positive community  relations and the superior attractiveness of our 
retail store compared to other options. Other factors include achieving 
product  sourcing,  operating  and  transportation  cost  savings,  while 
building strong, entrepreneurial store teams.

Our  ability  to  build  and  maintain  supportive  community 
relations:  Our ongoing community presence depends on our ability 
to  be  a  trusted,  open,  respectful  and  adaptable  organization.  Our 
approach  is  to  reflect  community  priorities  first  and  invest  in  local 
causes with community development and healthy living being two 
examples. We facilitate regular meetings with community and regional 
leadership  to  build  constructive  relationships  and  to  ensure  that 
information and ideas are shared on a proactive basis. 

Our  ability  to  attract,  retain  and  develop  highly  capable  store 
level employees and work practices:  Enhancing store stability and 
capability is an on-going priority that aligns with our goal of being a 
trusted local store. We continually invest in recruiting, retention and 
best practice work methods. This recognizes the important role played 
by our managers and other key store-level personnel in realizing local 
selling opportunities, meeting our customer service commitments and 
building  and  maintaining  positive  community  relationships.  It  also 
recognizes the reality that remoteness, employment competition from 
other  local  sectors  and  other  conditions  of  our  markets  create 
challenges in attracting and retaining people. Related to this is our on-
going  interest  in  hiring  locally  and  assisting  people  to  reach  their 
potential. 

Our ability to reduce costs across all of our store banners, improve 
competitiveness and create more time and skill at store level to 
sell merchandise:  A key goal is to shift more staff time and skill towards 
selling merchandise tailored to the unique markets  we serve,  while 
reducing  costs  in  the  non-selling  facets  of  store  work.  Productivity 
opportunities include labour scheduling, energy usage and inventory 
shrinkage. We have developed  alliances  with  other  non-competing 
retailers to provide sales and distribution services for certain products 
and services where we do not have the scale to achieve a lower cost 
structure on our own. Our new store banners and recent acquisitions 
have further enabled us to achieve cost efficiencies in direct importing, 
freight  consolidation  and  general  administration  expenses  while 
enabling us to share our specialized retail knowledge and ideas among 
our retail, wholesale and support service groups.

CONVERSION TO A SHARE CORPORATION

On  January  1,  2011,  the  North  West  Company  Fund  (the “Fund”) 
completed  its  previously  announced  conversion  to  a  corporation 
named The North West Company Inc. (the “Company”) by way of a plan 
of  arrangement  under  section  192  of  the  Canada  Business 
Corporations Act.  Unitholders of the Fund received one common share 
of the Company for each unit of the Fund held. Upon conversion, the 
Company assumed all of the covenants and obligations of the Fund 
and the common shares of the Company began trading on the Toronto 
Stock Exchange under the symbol “NWC”. The details of the conversion 
and the Arrangement are contained in the management information 
circular  dated  April  29,  2010  which  is  available  on  the  Company's 
website at www.northwest.ca or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  

The conversion was accounted for as a continuity of interests and 
as such the carrying amounts of the assets, liabilities and unitholders' 
in  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  the  Fund 
equity 
immediately before the conversion was the same as the carrying values 
of the Company immediately after the conversion. The comparative 
amounts in this MD&A and in the consolidated financial statements 
are those of the Fund restated to conform with IFRS. The MD&A and 
consolidated financial statements contain references to “shareholders”, 
“shares”  and  “dividends”  which  were  previously  referred  to  as 
“unitholders”, “units” and “distributions” under the Fund.  

As a result of the conversion to a share corporation, the earnings 
from The North West Company LP that previously flowed to the Fund 
on a pre-tax basis are now subject to income taxes based on statutory 
federal and provincial income tax rates commencing January 1, 2011. 
On November 21, 2011, income tax legislation was enacted to 
curtail income deferral by corporations with a partnership that has a 
different taxation year. The new legislation requires income from these 
partnerships to be reported on an accrual basis for tax purposes but 
also includes transitional provisions whereby income earned from the 
partnership  during  the  initial  adoption  year  can  be  deferred  and 
recognized over a  subsequent  five-year  period.  As  a  result  of  these 
transition rules, a substantial portion of the income tax payable of the 
Canadian Operations for 2011 has been deferred and will be paid over 
the next five years. This deferred tax liability has been recorded as a 
reduction of deferred tax assets. Further information on deferred tax 
assets  and  deferred  tax  liabilities  is  provided  in  Note  9  to  the 
consolidated financial statements.

FISCAL YEAR

The fiscal year ends on January 31. The 2012 year which ended January 
31, 2013 had 366 days of operations as a result of February 29th. The 
first  quarter  had  90  days  of  operations  compared  to  89  days  of 
operations in the first quarter  of 2011. The estimated impact  of the 
extra day has been deducted from 2012 same store sales. 

8THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
Consolidated Results

2012 Highlights
• 

Sales increased to $1.514 billion, our 13th consecutive year of sales 
growth.
Net earnings increased 12.4% to $65.1 million.
Cash  flow  from  operating  activities  increased  11.7%  to  $129.0 
million and has grown 8.1% on a compound annual basis over 
the past 10 years.
Quarterly dividends to shareholders increased 8.3% to $0.26 per 
share.
Return  on  average equity  was  22.5%,  our  seventh  consecutive 
year greater than 20.0%.  
Return on net assets was 20.7% compared to 18.5% in 2011.
Debt-to-equity improved to .55:1. 
Total returns to shareholders were 25.1% for the year and were 
11.8% on a compound annual basis over the past five years.  

• 
• 

• 

• 

• 
• 
• 

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Food sales increased 1.8% from 2011, and were up 1.6% excluding 
the  foreign  exchange  impact  led  by  sales  growth  in  our  Canadian 
Operations. Continued improvement in our in-stock performance and 
a  focus  on  higher  growth food  product  categories  in  our  northern 
Canada stores contributed to the sales growth. Same store food sales 
increased 1.4% over last year with quarterly  same store increases of 
2.8%, 2.0%, 1.0% and 0.6% in the fourth quarter. Canadian food sales 
increased 1.9% and International food sales were up 1.0% excluding 
the foreign exchange impact. 

General  merchandise  sales  decreased  2.1%  compared  to  2011 
and were down 2.2% excluding the foreign exchange impact. Same 
store general merchandise sales decreased by 3.1% for the year with 
an increase of 4.7% in the first quarter and decreases of 0.8%, 5.8% and 
6.8% in the last three quarters of the year. General merchandise sales 
were  weak  across  all  of  our  banners  due  to  lower  spending  in 
discretionary categories such as electronics and home furnishings and 
a weaker assortment in other categories.   

Other  revenue,  which  includes  fuel,  fur  and  service  charge 
revenue, increased 7.5% compared to 2011 largely due to fuel market 
share gains and inflation.

Some  of  the  key  performance  indicators  used  by  management  to 
assess results are summarized in the following table:

Sales Blend  The table below shows the consolidated sales blend over 
the past three years: 

Key Performance Indicators

($ in thousands,
 except per share/unit)

2012

2011

2010

Sales

$ 1,513,646

$ 1,495,136

$ 1,448,104

Same store sales % increase(1)

0.5%

3.3%

2.7%

Trading profit(2) (EBITDA)

$ 134,267

EBIT(2)

Net earnings(3)

Net earnings per share/unit -
    basic(3)

Net earnings per share/unit -
    diluted(3)

Cash dividends/distributions
    per share/unit(3)

$

$

$

$

$

97,118

65,148

1.35

1.34

1.04

Total assets

$ 651,394

Total long-term liabilities

$ 164,960

Return on net assets(2)

Return on average equity(2),(3)

20.7%

22.5%

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

125,881

89,309

57,961

1.20

1.19

1.05

626,917

215,206

18.5%

20.1%

125,764

90,272

69,656

1.45

1.44

1.42

616,588

144,736

17.9%

24.1%

(1)  All references to same store sales excludes the foreign exchange impact
(2)  See Non-GAAP financial measures section on page 26
(3)  Effective January 1, 2011 ("2010"), North West Company Fund converted 
to a share corporation called The North West Company Inc. Information on 
the impact of the conversion is provided in net earnings on page 10, return 
on average equity on page 11 and shareholder dividends and unitholder 
distributions on page 15. 

Consolidated Sales  Sales for the year ended January 31, 2013 (“2012”) 
increased 1.2% to $1.514 billion compared to $1.495 billion for the year 
ended January 31, 2012 (“2011”), and were up 4.5% compared to $1.448 
billion for the year ended January 31, 2011 (“2010”). Sales for the year 
were negatively impacted by store closures in the Canadian Operations 
partially offset by one extra day of operations as a result of February 
29th  and  the  foreign  exchange  impact  on  the  translation  of  U.S. 
denominated  sales  in  the  International  Operations.  Excluding  the 
foreign exchange impact, sales increased 1.0% from 2011 and were up 
5.5% from 2010. On a same store basis, sales increased 0.5% compared 
to increases of 3.3% in 2011 and 2.7% in 2010. 

Food

General merchandise

Other

2012

76.8%

19.5%

3.7%

2011

76.4%

20.2%

3.4%

2010

76.4%

20.3%

3.3%

Canadian Operations accounted for 68.9% of total sales (68.8% in 2011 
and 67.6% in 2010) while International Operations contributed 31.1% 
(31.2%  in 2011and 32.4% in 2010). 

Gross Profit  Gross profit increased 3.9% to $444.7 million compared 
to $428.0 million last year driven by sales growth and a 75 basis points 
improvement in the gross profit rate. The gross profit rate was 29.38% 
compared to 28.63% last year as food gross profit rate improvements 
in both Canadian and International Operations more than offset lower 
general  merchandise  gross profit  rates. Food gross profit  rate  gains 
were  largely  due  to  better  buying  and  inventory  management, 
favourable changes in product mix and improved perishable category 
performance. 

Selling, operating and administrative expenses  Selling, operating 
and  administrative  expenses  (“expenses”) increased  2.6%  to  $347.6 
million and increased 31 basis points as a percentage of sales compared 
to last year. The most significant factor was a $3.7 million increase in 
share-based compensation costs largely due to a higher share price 
compared to last  year. The  share price  increased $3.74  per  share or 

9ANNUAL REPORT 
information  on  share-based  compensation 

19.3% to $23.14 at January 31, 2013 compared to $19.40 at January 31, 
2012.  Additional 
is 
provided in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.  Costs 
related to store closures in the Canadian Operations and higher utility 
costs and employee medical insurance expenses in the International 
Operations also contributed to the increase in expenses.  

Earnings  from  operations  (EBIT)   Earnings  from  operations  or 
earnings before interest and income taxes (“EBIT”)  increased 8.7% to 
$97.1 million compared to $89.3 million last year as sales growth and 
gross  profit  rate  improvements  more  than  offset  higher  selling, 
operating  and  administrative  expenses.  Excluding  the  foreign 
exchange impact, earnings from operations increased $7.7 million or 
8.6% compared to last year. Trading profit or earnings before interest, 
income  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization  ("EBITDA")  of  $134.3 
million increased 6.7% compared to last year.  Excluding the foreign 
exchange  impact,  trading  profit  increased  6.5%  and  was  8.9%  as  a 
percentage to sales compared to 8.4% last year.      

Interest  expense  Interest  expense  decreased  3.6%  to  $5.8  million 
compared to $6.0 million last year. The decrease in interest expense is 
largely due to the capitalization of interest on construction projects. 
An increase in the average cost of borrowing to 3.5% compared to 3.2% 
in 2011 was partially offset by a 6.4% decrease in average debt levels 
compared  to  last  year.  Further  information  on  interest  expense  is 
provided in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.   

Income  tax  expense  The  provision  for  income  taxes  increased  to 
$26.2 million compared to $25.3 million last year and the effective tax 
rate for the year was 28.7% compared to 30.4% last year reflecting an 
increase in earnings in the Canadian Operations and lower earnings in 
the International Operations. The decrease in the effective tax rate is 
due to lower statutory income tax rates in Canada and the impact of 
income earned across the various tax jurisdictions in the International 
Operations. A more detailed explanation of the income tax provision 
and  deferred  tax  assets  is  provided  in  Note  9  to  the  consolidated 
financial statements.

Net  earnings  Consolidated  net  earnings  increased  12.4%  to  $65.1 
million or $1.34 per share on a diluted basis compared to $58.0 million 
or  $1.19  per  share in  2011. The  increase in  Canadian  earnings  from 
operations combined with lower income tax rates in Canada more than 
offset  lower  earnings  in  the  International  Operations.  Additional 
information on the financial performance of Canadian Operations and 
International  Operations  is  included  on  page  11  and  page  13 
respectively. In 2012, the average exchange rate used to translate U.S. 
denominated sales and expenses from the International Operations 
was relatively flat at 0.998 compared to 0.991 last year.

The Canadian dollar's depreciation versus the U.S. dollar in 2011 had 
the following net impact on the 2012 results:

Sales............................................................................increase of $3.1 million or 0.2%
Earnings from operations...............................................increase of $0.1 million
Net earnings............................................................................increase of $0.1 million
Diluted earnings per share..............................................................$0.00 per share

The decrease in net earnings from 2008 to 2010 compared to 2011 and 
2012 performance as shown in the preceding graph is largely due to 
the conversion to a share corporation and the taxation of earnings in 
the Canadian Operations. Prior to the conversion to a share corporation 
on January 1, 2011, earnings from The North West Company LP flowed 
to  North  West  Company  Fund  on  a  pre-tax  basis  and  were  fully 
distributed to unitholders. There was no income tax payable by the 
Fund on these distributions. See Conversion to a Share Corporation on 
page 8 for further information. 

Although  the  Company  was  structured  as  an  income  trust  for 
most of 2010, the application of different tax rates used to calculated 
deferred tax assets and liabilities for income trusts under IFRS compared 
to CGAAP resulted in an increase in the income tax provision from $7.3 
million under CGAAP to $14.5 million under IFRS. This change in income 
tax  expense  was  the  primary  reason  for  the  decrease  in  2010  net 
earnings reported under IFRS compared to 2009 net earnings reported 
under CGAAP. 

Total Assets    Consolidated assets  increased 3.9%  to  $651.4  million 
compared to $626.9 million in 2011 and were up 5.6% compared to 
$616.6 million in 2010. The increase in consolidated assets is largely 
due  to  higher  property  and  equipment  and  intangible  assets 
compared to last year and 2010 and an increase in deferred tax assets 
compared to last year. The increase in property and equipment is due 
to investments in new stores, major store renovations, improvements 
to  staff  housing  and  equipment  replacements.  The  increase  in 
intangible  assets 
is  primarily  due  to  the  development  of  a 
transportation management system and an upgrade to the Company's 
financial  management  system.  Deferred  tax  assets  have  increased 
compared to last year mainly due to tax assets related to property and 
equipment and share-based compensation.

Consolidated  working  capital  for  the  past  three  years 

is 

summarized in the following table: 

($ in thousands)

Current assets

Current liabilities

Working capital

2012

2011

2010

$ 303,896

$ 295,836

$ 284,789

$ (190,184)

$ (128,002)

$ (185,377)

$ 113,712

$ 167,834

$

99,412

Working capital decreased $54.1 million or 32.2% to $113.7 million 
compared to 2011 and was up $14.3 million or 14.4% compared to 
2010. The decrease in working capital compared to 2011 is primarily 
due to an increase in current liabilities largely related to the current 
portion of long-term debt and income tax payable. The current portion 
of long-term debt increased to $40.4 million compared to $0.6 million 
in 2011 but was down compared to $68.3 million in 2010 as a result of 
the  timing  of  the  maturity  of  loan  facilities.  See  Note  11  to  the 
consolidated financial statements for further information on long-term 
debt. The increase in income tax payable is due to the conversion from 
an  income  trust  to a  share corporation  on  January  1,  2011  and  the 
resulting taxation of Canadian earnings. 

Return on net assets employed increased to 20.7% from 18.5% in 
2011, and return on average equity increased to 22.5% from 20.1% in 
2011. Return on net assets increased due to a 8.7% increase in earnings 
before  interest  and  taxes  and  lower  average  net  assets  employed. 

10THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
Additional information on net assets employed for the Canadian and 
International Operations is on page 12 and page 14 respectively. 

Return  on  average  equity  improved  to  22.5%  due  to  a  12.4% 
increase in net earnings partially offset by an increase in average equity 
compared to last year. The decrease in the return on average equity 
from 2008 to 2010 compared to 2011 and 2012 as shown in the graph 
below is largely due to the conversion to a share corporation and the 
taxation of earnings in the Canadian Operations as previously noted. 
Further  information  on  shareholder's  equity  is  provided  in  the 
statements  of  changes  in  shareholders'  equity  in  the  consolidated 
financial statements.  

long-term 

  Consolidated 

Total  long-term  liabilities 
liabilities 
decreased $50.2 million or 23.3% to $165.0 million from 2011 and were 
up $20.2 million or 14.0%  compared to 2010. The decrease in long-
term liabilities from 2011 is largely due to an increase in the current 
portion of long-term debt related to the International Operations loan 
facilities that mature December 31, 2013. Further information on long-
term debt is included in the sources of liquidity and capital structure 
sections on page 16 and page 17 respectively and in Note 11 to the 
consolidated financial statements. 

The increase in long-term liabilities compared to 2010 is due to 
an increase in the defined benefit plan obligation largely related to a 
significant  decrease  in  the  discount  rate  used  to  calculate  pension 
liabilities. The  defined  benefit  obligation  increased  $19.4  million  to 
$28.4 million compared to $9.0 million in 2010. Further information on 
post-employment benefits is provided in Note 12 to the consolidated 
financial statements. 

Canadian Operations

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Canadian Operations results for the year are summarized by the key 
performance indicators used by management as follows:

Key Performance Indicators

Sales  Canadian Operations sales increased $14.7 million or 1.4% to 
$1.043 billion compared to $1.028 billion in 2011, and were up $64.4 
million or 6.6% compared to 2010. Same store sales increased 1.0% 
compared to a 3.7% increase in 2011. Food sales accounted for 72.2% 
(71.8% in 2011) of total Canadian sales. The balance was made up of 
general merchandise sales at 23.0% (23.6% in 2011) and other sales, 
which consists primarily  of fuel sales and service  charge revenue at 
4.8% (4.6% in 2011).    

Food  sales  increased  by  1.9%  over  2011  and  were  up  7.1% 
compared to 2010. Same store food sales increased 2.0% compared to 
3.8% in 2011. Same store food sales had quarterly increases of 4.2%, 
3.0%, 1.1% and 0.7%. Strong food sales growth in our northern markets 
in  part  to  product  assortment  changes  and  continued 
due 
improvement in our in-stock rates more than offset lower sales in less 
remote stores. Food sales in stores impacted by the Nutrition North 
Canada ("NNC") freight subsidy had the largest increases building on 
the sales growth in 2011. The Company continued to review its supply 
chain network in an effort to reduce transportation costs to the north. 
In September 2012, the Company began to air freight merchandise 
directly to Baffin Island from its distribution center in Winnipeg. The 
savings from this initiative were invested in price reductions of 15% or 
more on 175 key products sold in the Company's stores located on 
Baffin Island which also contributed to the sales gain. Food inflation 
resulting from higher commodity costs net of NNC freight subsidies 
was approximately 1%.    

General merchandise sales decreased 1.2% from 2011 but were 
up 3.3% compared to 2010. Same store sales decreased 2.2% compared 
to  a  3.3%  increase  in  2011.  On  a  quarterly  basis,  same  store  sales 
increased 6.3% in the first quarter followed by decreases of 0.3% in the 
second quarter and 5.4% in the last two quarters of the year. Sales were 
negatively impacted by assortment challenges and lower discretionary 
spending  on  electronics,  home  furnishings  and  other  hardlines 
categories.              

Other  revenues,  which  include  fuel,  fur  and  service  charge 
revenue, were up 7.9% from 2011 and increased 15.3% over 2010. The 
increase in other revenues is largely due to fuel market share gains and 
inflation.     

Sales Blend  The table below shows the sales blend for the Canadian 
Operations over the past three years: 

Food

General merchandise

Other

2012

72.2%

23.0%

4.8%

2011

71.8%

23.6%

4.6%

2010

71.8%

23.7%

4.5%

Same Store Sales  Canadian Operations have consistently achieved 
upper-quartile same store food sales reflecting the Company's focus 
on superior food selling execution within what are generally growing 
and  younger  markets  with  stable  base  income  profiles. Same  store 
general merchandise sales have been more volatile because they are 
heavily  weighted  to  big-ticket  durable  goods  that  depend  upon 
customers' discretionary income. Same store sales for the past three 
years are shown in the following table:

($ in thousands)

Sales

2012

2011

2010

$ 1,043,050

$ 1,028,396

$ 978,662

Same Store Sales

Same store sales % increase

1.0%

3.7%

4.1%

Trading profit (1)  (EBITDA)

Earnings from operations (1)
     (EBIT)

$

$

107,060

77,905

$

$

97,998

$ 98,781

(% change)

Food

69,253

$ 71,270

General merchandise

Return on net assets (1)

25.0%

20.7%

20.2%

Total sales

(1)   See Non-GAAP financial measures section on page 26

2012

2.0 %

(2.2)%

1.0 %

2011

3.8%

3.3%

3.7%

2010

4.6%

2.6%
4.1%  

11ANNUAL REPORT 
     
  
      
         
                     
Inventory  decreased  due  to  the  store  closures,  merchandise 
assortment  reviews  and  a  greater  focus  on  inventory  productivity. 
Average inventory levels in 2012 were $4.1 million or 3.1% lower than 
2011 and $3.0 million or 2.3% lower than 2010 due to store closures 
and  changes 
Inventory  turnover 
improved to 5.7 times from 5.5 times in 2011 and 5.2 times in 2010.

in  merchandise  assortments. 

Accounts receivable decreased $6.6 million or 9.9% from 2011 and 
average accounts receivable were $0.6 million or 1.0% lower than 2011. 
The decrease in accounts receivable is due to lower customer demand 
for big-ticket merchandise, the timing of collections and a decrease in 
an  insurance  related  accounts  receivable  resulting  from  stores 
destroyed by fire in 2011. 

Other assets increased $20.1 million or 40.3% compared to last 
year and were up $11.1 million or 18.9% compared to 2010 largely due 
to an increase in cash, intangible assets and deferred tax assets. The 
increase in cash is due to deposits in-transit at year-end and higher 
cash  balances  to  support  our  financial  services  business.  Intangible 
assets  increased  compared  to  last  year  and  2010  largely  due  to 
investments  in  the  development  of  a  transportation  management 
system  and  an  upgrade  of  the  Company's  financial  management 
system.  Deferred  tax  assets  have  increased  compared  to  last  year 
mainly due to tax assets related to property and equipment and share-
based compensation. Further information on deferred tax assets and 
deferred tax liabilities is provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial 
statements.

Liabilities increased $24.7 million or 19.2% from 2011 and were 
up $48.2 million or 45.9% compared to 2010 primarily due to higher 
accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities,  income  tax  payable  and 
defined  benefit  plan  obligations.  Accounts  payable  and  accrued 
liabilities increased due to higher trade accounts payable related to the 
timing  of  payments  and  higher  accrued  incentive  plan  expenses 
compared to 2010. Income tax payable increased $15.0 million over 
2011 and $18.3 million over 2010 due to the conversion from an income 
trust to a share corporation and the timing of income tax installment 
payments.  Further  information  on  the  Conversion  to  a  Share 
Corporation is provided on page 8. The defined benefit plan obligation 
increased $0.8 million to $28.4 million compared to 2011 and was up 
$19.4  million  compared  to  $9.0  million  in  2010  largely  due  to  a 
significant  decrease  in  the  discount  rate  used  to  calculate  pension 
liabilities.  Further 
is 
information  on  post-employment  benefits 
provided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.       

Return  on  Net  Assets  The  return  on  net  assets  employed  for 
Canadian Operations improved to 25.0% from 20.7% in 2011 due to a 
12.5%  increase  in  EBIT  and  the  impact  of  lower  average  net  assets 
compared to last year as noted above.   

Gross Profit  Gross profit dollars for Canadian Operations increased by 
5.0% driven by sales growth and improvement in gross profit rates. The 
higher  gross  profit  rates  were  due  to  product  assortment  changes, 
better  buying  and  inventory  management,  improved  perishable 
category profitability, and reduced pricing pressure in select southern 
markets compared to last year. Higher gross profit rates on gasoline 
was also a factor. Partially offsetting these improvements were higher 
markdowns  to clear  slow  moving  general  merchandise in  northern 
markets.   

Selling, operating and administrative expenses   Selling, operating 
and  administrative expenses  (“expenses”) increased 2.9%  from 2011 
and were up 32 basis points as a percentage of sales compared to last 
year. Higher share-based compensation costs related to an increase in 
share price  compared to last  year as  noted under  the  consolidated 
financial results was the largest factor contributing to the increase in 
expenses. A $1.3 million loss on the closure of six Giant Tiger stores and 
higher pension costs were also factors. Excluding the Giant Tiger store 
closure loss, expenses increased 20 basis points as a percentage of sales.  

Earnings  from  operations  (EBIT)      Earnings  from  operations 
increased $8.7  million  or  12.5%  to  $77.9  million  compared to  $69.3 
million in 2011 as sales growth and an improvement in gross profit 
rates more than offset higher expenses. Trading profit from Canadian 
Operations increased $9.1 million or 9.2% to $107.1 million and was 
10.3% as a percentage of sales compared to 9.5% in 2011. Excluding 
the Giant Tiger store closure loss, trading profit increased 10.6% and 
was 10.4% as a percentage of sales.  

Net  Assets  Employed      Net  assets  employed  at  January 31,  2013, 
decreased  7.5%  to  $291.9  million  compared  to  $315.5  million  at 
January 31, 2012, as summarized in the following table:

($ in millions at the end of the fiscal
     year)

2012

2011

2010

Property and equipment

$ 190.8

$

196.1

$

189.6

Inventory

Accounts receivable

Other assets

Liabilities

124.2

60.0

70.0

131.3

66.6

49.9

126.2

61.1

58.9

(153.1)

(128.4)

(104.9)

Net Assets Employed

$ 291.9

$

315.5

$

330.9

Property  and  equipment  decreased  compared  to  2011  largely 
due to the Giant Tiger store closures. Capital expenditures for the year 
included new stores, store replacements and major store renovation 
projects, staff housing renovations and energy-efficient refrigeration 
upgrades.  

12THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
       
International Operations 

(Stated in U.S. dollars)

International Operations include Alaska Commercial Company ("AC"), 
Cost-U-Less ("CUL") and Pacific Alaska Wholesale ("PAW").

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

International Operations results for the year are summarized by the key 
performance indicators used by management as follows:

Key Performance Indicators

($ in thousands)

Sales

Same store sales %
    increase (decrease)

2012

2011

2010

$ 471,728

$ 470,932

$ 457,590

(0.6)%

2.3%

(0.2)%

Trading profit(1) (EBITDA)

$ 27,273

$ 28,133

$ 26,302

Sales Blend  The table below reflects the growing ratio of food sales 
to the total sales of  International Operations: 

Food

General merchandise

Other

2012

87.1%

11.8%

1.1%

2011

86.3%

12.6%

1.1%

2010

85.9%

13.1%

1.0%

Same store sales   International Operations same store sales for the 
past three years are shown in the following table. General merchandise 
same store sales are significantly impacted by consumer spending on 
big-ticket durable goods that are largely influenced by the previously 
mentioned special payments, such as the Permanent Fund Dividend, 
which can result in greater sales volatility. 

Same store sales

(% change)

Food

General merchandise

2012

0.3 %

(6.8)%

(0.6)%

2011

2.9 %

(1.8)%

2.3 %

2010

(0.1)%

(1.0)%

(0.2)%

Earnings from operations(1)
     (EBIT) 

$ 19,259

$ 20,236

$ 18,522

Total sales

Gross Profit  Gross profit dollars increased 0.4% reflecting sales growth 
and a slight improvement in gross profit rate from 2011. An increase 
in food gross profit rates, resulting in part from improved execution in 
perishable departments, was largely offset by higher markdowns to 
clear  slow-moving  general  merchandise  and  prepare  for  the 
repositioning of merchandise assortments in select store locations. 

Selling,  operating  and  administrative  Selling,  operating  and 
administrative expenses (“expenses”) increased 1.5% over last year and 
were up 28  basis  points  as  a  percentage of  sales. Higher  employee 
medical 
leading  factors 
contributing to the increase in expenses. These two factors combined 
increased $1.7 million or 9.1% compared to 2011 and were up $3.6 
million or 21.0% over 2010. Partially offsetting these costs, were lower 
incentive plan expenses compared to last year.  

insurance  and  utility  costs  were  the 

Earnings  from  operations  (EBIT) 
  Earnings  from  operations 
decreased  $1.0  million  or  4.8%  to  $19.3  million  compared  to  $20.2 
million  in  2011  as  higher  expenses  were  only  partially  offset  by  an 
increase in gross profit. Trading profit decreased $0.9 million or 3.1% to 
$27.3 million and was 5.8% as a percentage of sales compared to 6.0% 
in 2011. 

Return on net assets (1)

12.1 %

13.6%

12.6 %

(1)  See Non-GAAP financial measures section on page 26

Sales  International sales increased 0.2% to $471.7 million compared 
to $470.9 million in 2011, and were up 3.1% compared to 2010 as food 
sales growth was largely offset by lower general merchandise sales. 
Same store sales decreased 0.6% compared to a 2.3% increase in 2011 
and a 0.2% decrease in 2010. Food sales accounted for 87.1% (86.3% 
in  2011)  of  total  sales  with  the  balance  comprised  of  general 
merchandise at 11.8% (12.6% in 2011) and other sales, which consist 
primarily  of fuel sales and service  charge revenues, at 1.1% (1.1% in 
2011).

Food sales increased 1.0% from 2011 and were up 4.4% compared 
to  2010.  Same  store  food  sales  were  up  0.3%  compared  to  a  2.9% 
increase in 2011. Quarterly same store food sales increases were 0.1%, 
0.2%,  0.6%  and  0.3%.  Our  CUL  stores  and  PAW business  were  the 
primary  contributors  to  the  sales  growth.  CUL  provided  food  sales 
growth throughout the year, building on the same store sales gains in 
2011. The PAW  business also delivered another year of sales growth as 
it continues to recapture market share after a significant sales decrease 
in 2010.  

General merchandise sales decreased 6.1% from 2011 and were 
down 6.6% from 2010. On a same store basis, general merchandise 
sales  were  down  6.8%  compared  to  a  decrease  of  1.8%  in  2011. 
Quarterly same store sales were down 2.0%, 2.8% and 7.5% in the first 
three quarters and decreased 12.6% in the fourth quarter compared 
to a 7.1% increase in the fourth quarter last year. Lower discretionary 
spending due to a weak economic environment, high unemployment 
levels  and  increases  in  energy-related  living  expenses  negatively 
impacted sales, particularly in electronics, transportation, furniture and 
seasonal merchandise. In Alaska,  a decrease in the Permanent Fund 
Dividend  (“PFD”),  regional  native  corporation  dividends,  and  claims 
settlement  payments  were  also  factors. The  PFD  paid  to  qualifying 
Alaskan residents decreased 25.2% to $878 compared to $1,174 last 
year and $1,281 in 2010. 

Other revenues, which consist of fuel and service charge revenue, 
were up 3.3% from 2011 and were up 16.0% from 2010 primarily due 
to fuel inflation.  

13ANNUAL REPORT 
Net Assets Employed   International Operations net assets employed 
increased $24.4 million or 17.0% to $167.8 million compared to $143.4 
million  in  2011  and  were  up  $19.8  million  or  13.4%  from  2010  as 
summarized in the following table:

Net Assets Employed 

($ in millions at the end of the fiscal
     year)

Property and equipment

$

Inventory

Accounts receivable

Other assets

Liabilities

Total

2012

83.3

63.1

10.1

50.2

$

2011

73.9

54.5

9.9

43.7

$

2010

69.9

50.7

9.1

50.8

(38.9)

(38.6)

(32.5)

$ 167.8

$ 143.4

$ 148.0

Property  and  equipment  increased  reflecting  a  store  replacement, 
energy-efficient 
substantial 
refrigeration  upgrades,  and 
completion of construction of a new Cost-U-Less  store in Barbados 
that opened on February 23, 2013. 

the 

Inventories increased compared to last year and 2010 largely due 
to additional food inventory related to a focus on in-stock rates and 
the new store in Barbados. Commodity cost increases were also a factor. 
Average inventory levels in 2012 were $2.7 million or 4.8% higher than 
2011 and up $4.4 million or 8.0% compared to 2010. Inventory turnover 
decreased to 6.0 times in 2012 compared to 6.2 times in 2011. 

Other assets increased $6.5 million or 14.9% compared to last year 
largely  due  to  higher  cash  balances  at  the  end  of  the  year  and  an 
increase in deferred tax assets.  

Liabilities were consistent with 2011 but increased compared to 

2010 due primarily to higher trade accounts payable.

Return  on  Net  Assets  The  return  on  net  assets  employed  for 
International Operations decreased to 12.1% from 13.6% in 2011 due 
to lower EBIT and higher average net assets employed as noted above.  

Consolidated Liquidity 
and Capital Resources 

The following table summarizes the major components of cash flow:

($ in thousands)

Cash flows from (used in):

Operating activities

Investing activities

Financing activities

Net change in cash

2012

2011

2010

$ 128,992

$ 115,469

$ 114,564

$ (48,781)

$ (45,948)

$ (34,124)

$ (68,520)

$ (73,768)

$ (76,487)

$

11,691

$

(4,247)

$

3,953

Cash from operating activities  Cash flow from operating activities 
increased 11.7% to $129.0 million. Changes in non-cash working capital 
positively impacted cash flow from operating activities by $10.8 million 
compared to a decrease in cash flow of $3.0 million in 2011. The change 
in non-cash working capital is largely due to a decrease in accounts 
receivable  and  an  increase  in  accounts  payable  as  noted  in  the 
Canadian and International net assets employed on pages 12 and 14 
respectively.  

The Company paid income taxes of $15.5 million compared to 
$6.2 million in 2011. Following the conversion to a share corporation 
on January 1, 2011 and the deferral of the payment of Canadian income 
taxes in the transition year in accordance with income tax legislation 
enacted November 21, 2011, the Company began paying Canadian 
income tax installments in 2012. The remaining balance of the accrued 
Canadian income taxes for 2012 of approximately $19 million will be 
paid in the first quarter of 2013. The Company expects its Canadian 
monthly tax installments to increase in 2013 based on a normalized 
level of taxable income and the recognition of a portion of the deferred 
taxable income from the transition year. Further information on the 
Conversion to a Share Corporation is provided on page 8.  

Cash flow from operating activities and unutilized credit available 
on existing loan facilities are expected to be sufficient to fund operating 
requirements,  pension  plan  contributions,  and  planned  growth-
related capital expenditures as well as anticipated dividends during 
2013. 

The compound annual growth rate ("CAGR") for cash flow from 
operating  activities  over  the  past  10  years  is  8.1%  as  shown  in  the 
following graph:

(1) 2011 and 2012 are reported in accordance with IFRS. 2010 has been restated to IFRS.  
All other historical financial information was prepared in accordance with CGAAP and has 
not been restated to IFRS.

14THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012Cash  used  in  investing  activities   Net  cash  used  in  investing 
activities  was  $48.8  million  compared  to  $45.9  million  in  2011.  Net 
investing in Canadian Operations was $31.7 million ($34.3 million in 
2011). A summary  of the Canadian Operations investing activities is 
included  in  net  assets  employed  on  page  12.  Net  investing  in 
International Operations was $17.1 million compared to $11.6 million 
in 2011. A summary of the International Operations investing activities 
is included in net assets employed on page 14. 

The following table summarizes the number of stores and selling 
square footage under NWC's various retail banners at the end of the 
fiscal year:   

Northern

NorthMart

Quickstop

Giant Tiger

AC Value Centers

Cost-U-Less

Other Formats

Number of Stores

Selling square footage

2012

121

2011

123

7

16

31

30

12

6

7

15

36

30

12

6

2012

681,456

148,306

27,999

494,057

300,882

336,138

45,716

2011

690,921

148,306

26,566

577,432

295,742

336,138

45,716

Total at year-end

223

229

2,034,554

2,120,821

In the Canadian Operations, a new QuickStop convenience store was 
opened in Rankin Inlet, Nunavut and a Giant Tiger store was opened 
in Swift Current, Saskatchewan. New Northern stores were opened in 
Taloyoak, Nunavut  and  Oxford  House,  Manitoba,  replacing  existing 
facilities and two Northern stores and six underperforming Giant Tiger 
stores were closed. Total selling square feet in Canada decreased to 
1,374,647 from 1,466,054 in 2011. 

In  the  International  Operations,  a  new  AC  Value  Center  was 
opened in Emmonak, Alaska replacing an existing facility. International 
selling square feet increased to 659,907 from 654,767 in 2011.   

Cash used in financing activities  Cash used in financing activities 
was $68.5 million compared to $73.8 million in 2011. The decrease is 
mainly related to a change in amounts drawn on the loan facilities and 
the repayment of a US$3.9 million note payable in the International 
Operations  last  year.  Further  information  on  the  loan  facilities  is 
provided in the Sources of Liquidity section below. 

Shareholder Dividends / Unitholder Distributions  The Company 
paid dividends of $50.3 million or $1.04 per share compared to $50.8 
million or $1.05 per share paid in 2011, including the final distribution 
from  the  Fund.  Excluding  the  final  distribution  from  the  Fund,  the 
quarterly  dividend  increased  8.3%  from  2011.  In  2010,  the  last  year 
under the income trust structure, the Fund paid distributions of $68.7 
million or $1.42 per unit. The decrease in dividends in 2012 and 2011 
compared to the distributions paid in 2010 is due to the conversion to 
a  share  corporation  and  the  taxation  of  earnings  of  the  Canadian 
Operations. Prior to the conversion to a share corporation, earnings 
from The North West Company LP flowed to the Fund on a pre-tax basis 
and  were  distributed  to  unithholders. While  higher  corporate  taxes 
have  reduced  the  Company's  net  earnings  and  cash  available  for 
dividends to shareholders, the after-tax impact on personal income is 
largely offset for taxable Canadian investors due to the dividend tax 
credit. 

The following table shows the quarterly cash dividends per share 

and distributions per unit paid for the past three years:  

First Quarter

Second Quarter

Third Quarter

Fourth Quarter

Special distribution

Total

Dividends

Dividends Distributions

2012

$ 0.26

2011

$ 0.24

2010

$ 0.34

0.26

0.26

0.26

—

0.24

0.24

0.24

0.09

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.06

$ 1.04

$ 1.05

$ 1.42

The payment of dividends on the Company's common shares is subject 
to the approval of the Board of Directors and is based on, among other 
factors,  the  financial  performance  of  the  Company, its  current  and 
anticipated future business needs and the satisfaction of solvency tests 
imposed  by  the  Canada  Business  Corporations  Act  (“CBCA”) for the 
declaration  of  dividends. The  dividends  were designated as  eligible 
dividends in accordance with the provisions of the Canadian Income 
Tax Act. 

The  determination  to  declare  and  make  payable  distributions 
from the Fund was subject to the terms of the Fund's Declaration of 
Trust and the discretion of the Board of Trustees. The Fund's distribution 
policy was to make distributions to unitholders equal to the taxable 
income  of  the  Fund. The taxable  income  of  the  Fund was  primarily 
based  on  an  allocation  of  the  taxable  income  of  The  North  West 
Company  LP  less  Fund  expenses.  In  addition  to  the  quarterly 
distributions,  a  special  year-end  distribution  was  declared  to 
unitholders if the taxable income of the Fund exceeded the cumulative 
distributions for the year. A special distribution of $0.09 per unit was 
paid February 18, 2011 to unitholders of record on December 31, 2010. 
The Fund's obligation to pay the $0.09 per unit special distribution was 
assumed  by  the  Company  as  part  of  the  conversion  to  a  share 
corporation (see Conversion to a Share Corporation on page 8). Further 
information on dividends is included in Note 19 to the consolidated 
financial statements. 

The  following  table  shows  dividends  and  distributions  paid  in 
comparison to cash flow from operating activities for the past three 
years:

Dividends/Distributions

$ 50,320

$ 50,797

$ 68,700

2012

2011

2010

Cash flow from operating
     activities

Dividends/Distributions as a %
     of cash flow from operating
     activities

$128,992

$115,469

$114,564

39.0%

44.0%

60.0%

The decrease in dividends as a percentage of cash flow from operating 
activities to 39.0% compared to 2010 is largely due to the conversion 
to a share corporation and the taxation of earnings in the Canadian 
Operations.  The  Canadian  Operations  began  paying  income  tax 
installments  in  2012  which  has  reduced  cash  flow  from  operating 
activities. The Company's income tax payments will increase in 2013 
based on the payment of the remaining accrued income taxes for 2012 
and higher Canadian monthly tax installments based on a normalized 
level of taxable income. Further information is provided under cash 
from operating activities on page 14.

15ANNUAL REPORT 
The  compound  annual  growth  rate  (CAGR)  for  dividends  and 
distributions over the past 10 years is 7.2% as shown in the following 
graph:

(1) All per unit information has been restated to reflect the three-for-one unit split that    

occurred on September 20, 2006.

(2)  From 2002 to 2010, amounts paid to unitholders were distributions from the Fund. The  
Fund converted to a share corporation effective January  1, 2011.  The $1.05 paid to 
shareholders in 2011 includes a $0.09 per unit final distribution from the Fund paid by 
the Company as part of the conversion to a share corporation plus dividends of $0.96 
per share.

(3)  The Fund paid a special distribution of $0.11 per unit on a split adjusted basis.

Subsequent event - dividends   On  March 14, 2013, the Board of 
Directors  approved  a  quarterly  dividend  of  $0.28  per  share  to 
shareholders of record on March 28, 2013, to be paid on April 15, 2013. 
This is an increase of $0.02 per share or 7.7% compared to the $0.26 
per  share  quarterly  dividend  paid  in  2012.  On  an  annual  basis,  the 
Company  anticipates  paying  dividends  of  approximately  $1.12  per 
share compared to $1.04 per share in 2012. 

Post-employment benefits   The Company sponsors defined benefit 
and  defined  contribution  pension  plans  covering  the  majority  of 
Canadian employees. Effective January 1, 2011, the Company entered 
into an amended and restated staff pension plan, which incorporated 
legislated  changes,  administrative  practice,  and  added  a  defined 
contribution provision. Under the amended pension plan, all members 
who did not meet a qualifying threshold based on number of years in 
the pension plan and age were transitioned to the defined contribution 
pension plan effective January 1, 2011 and no longer accumulate years 
of service under the defined benefit pension plan. The defined benefit 
pension previously earned by the members transitioned to the defined 
contribution  plan  will  continue  to  accrue  in  accordance  with  the 
provisions  of  the  amended  plan  based  on  the  member's  current 
pensionable  earnings.  Members  who  met  the  required  qualifying 
threshold  elected  between  continuing  to  accrue  a  defined  benefit 
pension and accruing a defined contribution benefit. 

As a result of further reductions in already low long-term interest 
rates, the Company recorded net actuarial losses on defined benefit 
pension plans of $2.6 million net of deferred income taxes in other 
comprehensive  income  compared  to  net  actuarial  losses  of  $15.3 
million  net  of  deferred  income  taxes  in  2011. The  charge  to  other 
comprehensive  income  was  immediately  recognized  in  retained 
earnings.  The  actuarial  loss  in  2012  was  due  to  a  decrease  in  the 
discount rate used to calculate pension liabilities from 4.5% in 2011 to 
4.3% in 2012. The net actuarial loss in 2011 was due to a decrease in 
the discount rate from 5.8% in 2010 to 4.5% in 2011 and lower than 
expected return on pension plan assets. 

In  2013,  the  Company  will  be 

required  to  contribute 
approximately  $7.2  million  to  the  defined  benefit  pension  plan  of 
which approximately $3.9 million of this obligation may be settled by 
the issuance of a letter of credit in accordance with pension legislation. 
The  cash  contribution  to  the  pension  plan  is  expected  to  be 
approximately $3.3 million in 2013 compared to $5.6 million in 2012. 
The  actual  amount  of  the  contributions  may  be  different  from  the 
estimate based on actuarial valuations, plan investment performance, 
volatility in discount rates, regulatory requirements and other factors. 
The Company also expects to contribute approximately $2.2 million to 
the  defined  contribution  pension  plan  in  2013  compared  to  $2.0 
million in 2012. Additional information regarding post-employment 
benefits is provided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

Sources  of  liquidity  The  Canadian  Operations  have  available 
committed, extendible, revolving loan facilities of $170.0 million that 
mature on December 31, 2015. These facilities are secured by a floating 
charge on the assets of the Company and rank pari passu with the US
$70.0  million  senior  notes  and  the  US$52.0  million  loan  facilities  in 
International Operations. These loan facilities bear a floating interest 
rate based on Banker's Acceptances' rates plus stamping fees or the 
Canadian prime interest rate. At January 31, 2013, the Company had 
drawn $52.5 million on these facilities (January 31, 2012 - $68.9 million).     

At January 31, 2013, the Canadian Operations have outstanding 
US$70.0 million senior notes (January 31, 2012 - US$70.0 million) that 
mature on June 15, 2014. The senior notes are secured by a floating  
charge on  the  assets  of  the  Company and  rank  pari passu  with  the 
$170.0 million loan facilities and the US$52.0 million loan facilities. The 
US$70.0 million senior notes have been designated as a hedge against 
the  U.S.  dollar  investment  in  the  International  Operations.  Of  this 
amount, US$42.0 million of the senior notes are at a fixed interest rate 
of 6.55%. Interest on US$28.0 million has been converted by an interest 
rate  swap  from  fixed  to  floating  rates  at  the  three-month  London 
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread. For more information on 
the senior notes and financial instruments, see Note 11 and Note 14 to 
the consolidated financial statements.

On October 25, 2012, the Company completed the refinancing of 
its US$20 million loan facility in the International Operations. The new, 
increased, committed, revolving loan facility  provides the Company 
with  a  US$30  million  revolving  loan  facility  for  working  capital 
requirements  and  general  business  purposes.  This  facility,  which 
matures October 31, 2015, is secured by certain accounts receivable 
and inventories of the International Operations and bears a floating 
interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. At January 31,  2013, the 
Company  had  drawn  US$0.7  million  on  these  facilities  (January 31, 
2012 - US$ NIL). 

The  Company's  International  Operations  also  have  available 
committed, revolving loan facilities of US$52.0 million that mature on 
December 31, 2013. These facilities are secured by a floating charge 
against the assets of the Company and rank pari passu with the US$70.0 
million senior notes and the $170.0 million loan facilities. These facilities 
bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread or the U.S. prime rate. At January 31, 
2013, the Company had drawn US$40.0 million (January 31, 2012 - US
$36.0 million) on these facilities. The Company does not anticipate any 
difficulty  in  securing  financing  to  satisfy  its  maturing  loan  facilities 
however,  economic  conditions  can  change  which  may  negatively 
impact the availability of credit, interest rates and the scope of financing 
covenants. For further information on risks related to refinancing, see 
liquidity risk in the risk management section on page 22.

16THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012The coverage ratio of earnings from operations ("EBIT") to interest has 
increased to 16.7 times compared to 14.9 times in 2011. 

Interest Costs and Coverage

Coverage ratio

EBIT ($ in millions)

Interest ($ in millions)

2012

16.7

$ 97.1

$

5.8

2011

14.9

$ 89.3

$

6.0

2010

14.8

$ 90.3

$

6.1

The loan facilities and senior notes contain covenants and restrictions 
including the requirement to meet certain financial ratios and financial 
condition  tests.  The  financial  covenants  include  a  fixed  charge 
coverage ratio, minimum current ratio, a leverage test and a minimum 
net worth test. At January 31, 2013, the Company is in compliance with 
all covenants under these facilities. Current and forecasted debt levels 
are regularly monitored for compliance with debt covenants.   

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Contractual obligations of the Company are listed in the chart below:

($ in thousands)

Total

0-1 Year

2-3 Years

4-5 Years

6 Years+

Long-term debt 
(including capital 
lease obligations) $163,354

$ 40,417

$122,937

$ — $ —

Operating leases

135,887

23,490

36,637

27,028

48,732

Other liabilities (1)

12,944

7,437

5,507

—

—

Total

$312,185

$ 71,344

$165,081

$ 27,028

$ 48,732

(1)  At year-end, the Company had additional long-term liabilities of $34.7 million 
which  included  other  liabilities,  defined  benefit  plan  obligations  and 
deferred income tax liabilities. These have not been included as the timing 
and amount of the future payments are uncertain.  

Director and Officer Indemnification Agreements   The Company 
has  agreements with  its  current  and  former  directors,  trustees,  and 
officers to indemnify them against charges, costs, expenses, amounts 
paid  in  settlement  and  damages  incurred  from  any  lawsuit  or  any 
judicial, administrative or investigative proceeding in which they are 
sued as a result of their service. Due to the nature of these agreements, 
the Company cannot make a reasonable estimate of the maximum 
amount it could be required to pay to counterparties. The Company 
has also purchased directors', trustees', and officers' liability insurance. 
No amount has been recorded in the financial statements regarding 
these indemnification agreements.

Other  Indemnification  Agreements    The  Company  provides 
indemnification  agreements  to  counterparties  for  events  such  as 
intellectual property right infringement, loss or damage to property, 
claims  that  may  arise  while  providing  services,  violation  of  laws  or 
regulations, or as a result of litigation that might be suffered by the 
counterparties. The terms and nature of these agreements are based 
on  the  specific  contract. The  Company  cannot  make  a  reasonable 
estimate  of  the  maximum  amount  it  could  be  required  to  pay  to 
counterparties.  No  amount  has  been  recorded  in  the  financial 
statements regarding these agreements.

Giant Tiger Master Franchise Agreement   In 2002, the Company 
signed a 30-year Master Franchise Agreement with Giant Tiger Stores 
Limited, based in Ottawa,  Ontario  which granted the Company the 
exclusive right to open Giant Tiger stores in western Canada. Under the 
agreement,  Giant  Tiger  Stores  Limited  provides  product  sourcing, 
merchandising, systems and administration support to the Company's 
Giant Tiger stores in return for a royalty based on sales. The Company 
is  responsible  for  opening,  owning,  operating  and  providing  food 
buying  and  distribution  services  to  the  stores.  The  Company's 
exclusivity right required that a minimum number of Giant Tiger stores 
be opened each year, based on an expected roll-out of 72 stores over 
the term of the agreement. As a result of the closure of six stores during 
2012, the Company has fallen below the minimum number of stores 
required to maintain its exclusive right to open Giant Tiger stores in 
western Canada. The loss of exclusivity does not constitute an event 
of default under the Company's master franchise rights and will not 
prevent the Company from continuing to operate its existing stores or 
information  on  commitments, 
open  new  stores.  Additional 
contingencies  and  guarantees  is  provided  in  Note  22  to  the 
consolidated financial statements.    

Related Parties     The  Company has  a  50%  ownership  interest in  a 
Inc.  and 
Canadian  Arctic  shipping  company,  Transport  Nanuk 
purchases  freight  handling  and  shipping  services  from  Transport 
Nanuk Inc. and its subsidiaries. The purchases are based on market rates 
for these types of services in an arm's length transaction. Additional 
information on the Company's transactions with Transport Nanuk Inc. 
is included in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements. 

Letters of Credit   In  the normal  course of business, the Company 
issues  standby  letters  of  credit  in  connection  with  defined  benefit 
pension  plans,  purchase  orders  and  performance  guarantees.  The 
aggregate potential liability related to letters of credit is approximately 
$14 million (January 31, 2012 - $15 million).

Capital Structure   The Company's capital management objectives 
are  to  deploy  capital  to  provide  an  appropriate  total  return  to 
shareholders while maintaining a capital structure that provides the 
flexibility to take advantage of growth opportunities, maintain existing 
assets,  meet  obligations  and  financial  covenants  and  enhance 
shareholder value. The capital structure of the Company consists of 
bank  advances, 
long-term  debt  and  shareholders'  equity.  The 
Company  manages  capital  to  optimize  efficiency  through  an 
appropriate balance of debt and equity. In order to maintain or adjust 
its capital structure, the Company may purchase shares for cancellation 
pursuant to normal course issuer bids, issue additional shares, borrow 
additional funds, adjust the amount of dividends paid or refinance debt 
at different terms and conditions. 

On a consolidated basis, the Company had $163.4 million in debt 
and $296.3 million in equity at the end of the year and a debt-to-equity 
ratio of 0.55:1 compared to 0.62:1 last year. The improvement in the 
debt-to-equity  ratio  is  largely  due  to  an  increase  in  earnings  and  a 
reduction in the amount of debt outstanding at the end of the year as 
a result of positive cash flow.   

17ANNUAL REPORTearnings  for  net  actuarial  losses  on  the  Company's  defined  benefit 
pension plan and an increase in dividends to shareholders.  Further 
information is provided in the statements of changes in shareholders' 
equity in the consolidated financial statements. 

 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Historically, the Company's first quarter sales are the lowest and fourth 
quarter  sales  are  the  highest,  reflecting  consumer  buying  patterns. 
Weather  conditions  are  often  more  extreme  compared  to  other 
retailers  and  can  affect  sales  in  any  quarter.  Net  earnings  generally 
follow higher sales, but can be dependent on markdown activity in key 
sales periods to reduce excess inventories. Net earnings are historically 
lower in the first quarter due to lower sales and fixed costs such as rent 
and overhead that apply uniformly throughout the year.   
The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial information:

($ thousands)

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Total

Sales

2012

2011

$365,517

$383,843

$377,664

$386,622

$1,513,646

$346,262

$372,945

$378,359

$397,570

$1,495,136

Trading profit (EBITDA)

2012

2011

$ 29,884

$ 36,572

$ 35,748

$ 32,063

$ 134,267

$ 28,387

$ 32,408

$ 34,476

$ 30,610

$ 125,881

Earnings from operations (EBIT)

2012

2011

$ 20,571

$ 27,361

$ 26,365

$ 22,821

$ 19,385

$ 23,408

$ 25,448

$ 21,068

Net earnings

2012

2011

$ 13,553

$ 18,277

$ 17,487

$ 15,831

$ 12,425

$ 15,035

$ 17,000

$ 13,501

Earnings per share-basic

2012

2011

$

$

0.28

0.26

$

$

Earnings per share-diluted

2012

2011

$

$

0.28

0.26

$

$

0.38

0.31

0.38

0.31

$

$

$

$

0.36

0.35

0.36

0.35

$

$

$

$

0.33

0.28

0.32

0.27

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

97,118

89,309

65,148

57,961

1.35

1.20

1.34

1.19

Fourth  Quarter  Highlights    Fourth  quarter  consolidated  sales 
decreased 2.8% to $386.6 million compared to $397.6 million in 2011 
primarily  due  to  weaker  performance  from  general  merchandise 
categories  and  the  impact  of  previously  announced  store  closures. 
Excluding the foreign exchange impact, sales decreased 1.9% and were 
down 1.2%(1) on a same store basis. Food sales(1) decreased 0.3% but 
were  up  0.6%  on  a  same  store  basis.  General  merchandise  sales(1) 
decreased 7.3% and were down 6.8% on a same store basis.  

rate 

improvements  and 

Earnings  from  Operations  increased  8.3%  to  $22.8  million 
compared to $21.1 million in the fourth quarter last year due to gross 
profit 
lower  selling,  operating  and 
administrative expenses. The gross profit rate improvement is primarily 
due  to  the  availability  of  special  item  buys, favourable product  mix 
changes,  and  reduction  in  product  waste  within  perishable  food 
categories. Selling, operating and administrative expenses decreased 
2.4% compared to last year due in part to lower incentive plan expenses 
in  the  International  Operations  and  were  up  8  basis  points  as  a 
percentage to sales. Excluding the foreign exchange impact, earnings 
from operations increased 9.2% compared to last year.  

Trading  profit  or  earnings  before 

income  taxes, 
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) increased 4.7% to $32.1 million 
compared  to  $30.6  million  last  year  as  gains  within  Canadian 
Operations more than offset a decrease in the International Operations. 

interest, 

(1) Excluding the foreign exchange impact.

The  capacity  of  the  Company's  capital  structure  is  reflected  in  the 
preceding  graph.  Over  the  past  five  years,  the  Company's  debt-to-
equity ratio has improved from .78:1 to .55:1. Equity has increased $21.8 
million or 8.0% to $296.3 million over the past five years and interest-
bearing debt has decreased $49.7 million or 23.3% to $163.4 million 
compared to $213.0 million in 2008. During this same time frame, the 
Company has made capital expenditures of $224.1 million and has paid 
distributions  and  dividends  of  $304.8  million.  This  reflects  the 
Company's balanced approach of investing to sustain and grow the 
business while providing shareholders with an annual cash return. 

Consolidated debt at the end of the year decreased $12.5 million 
or 7.1% to $163.4 million compared to $175.9 million in 2011, and was 
down  $29.2  million  or  15.2%  from  $192.6  million  in  2010.  As 
summarized in the table below, the decrease in debt is due to lower 
amounts  drawn  on  the  Canadian  Operations  and  International 
Operations loan facilities and the repayment of a US$3.9 million note 
payable in 2011. The Company has US$111.3 million in debt at January 
31,  2013  (January  31,  2012  -  US$107.2  million)  that  is  exposed  to 
changes  in  foreign  exchange  rates  when  translated  into  Canadian 
dollars. The exchange rate used to translate U.S. denominated debt into 
Canadian dollars at January 31, 2013 was 0.9992 compared to 1.0052 
at January 31, 2012 and 1.0022 at January 31, 2011. The difference in 
exchange rate did not have a significant impact on the translation of 
U.S.  denominated  debt  between  2010  and  2012.  Average  debt 
outstanding during the year excluding the foreign exchange impact 
decreased $13.6 million or 7.0% from 2011 and was down $34.1 million 
or 15.9% compared to 2010. The debt outstanding at the end of the 
fiscal year is summarized as follows:

($ in thousands at the end of
   the fiscal year)

2012

2011

2010

Senior notes

$ 69,461

$

69,626

$

69,199

Canadian revolving loan
    facilities

U.S. revolving loan facilities

Notes payable

Finance lease liabilities

Bank advances

Total

52,499

39,968

388

320

718

68,850

36,187

659

570

—

67,445

50,110

4,850

992

—

$ 163,354

$ 175,892

$ 192,596

Shareholder  Equity  The  Company  has  an  unlimited  number  of 
authorized  shares  and  had 
issued  and  outstanding  shares  at 
January 31,  2013  of  48,388,721  (48,378,000  as  at  January 31,  2012). 
Further information on the Company's share capital is provided in Note 
15 to the consolidated financial statements. 

Book value per share, on a diluted basis, at the end of the year 
increased to $6.10 compared to $5.85 per share in 2011. Shareholders' 
equity increased $12.5 million or 4.4% compared to 2011 due to higher 
net  earnings,  partially  offset  by  a  $2.6  million  charge  to  retained 

18THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012  
 
Excluding the foreign exchange impact, trading profit increased $1.7 
million or 5.5% and was 8.3% as a percentage to sales compared to 
7.7% last year.  

Interest expense decreased $0.5 million to $1.1 million due in part 
to the impact of lower average debt in the quarter and an increase in 
the capitalization of interest on construction projects.  

Income tax expense was flat to last year as higher earnings in the 
Canadian Operations were partially offset by lower income tax rates 
and the impact of income earned across the various tax jurisdictions 
in the International Operations. The consolidated effective tax rate in 
the quarter was 27.2% compared to 30.6% last year.  

Net  earnings  increased  17.3%  to  $15.8  million  and  diluted 
earnings per share increased to $0.32 compared to $0.27 per share last 
year largely due to earnings growth in the Canadian Operations and 
lower income tax rates. 

The Company recorded an actuarial gain of $2.5 million, net of 
deferred income tax, in other comprehensive income resulting from 
an increase in the discount rate and a higher than expected return on 
pension plan assets in the quarter.  

Working capital decreased $54.1 million or 32.2% compared to 
the fourth quarter last year largely due to the increase in the current 
portion of long-term debt. The increase in the current portion of long-
term  debt  is  due  to  the  International  Operations  loan  facilities  that 
mature December 31, 2013. Excluding the impact of the maturing loan 
facilities, working capital decreased $14.1 million or 8.4% compared to 
last year largely due to an increase in accounts payable and income 
tax payable related to the timing of payments. 

Cash flow from operating activities in the quarter decreased $1.5 
million or 2.9% to $51.4 million from $52.9 million last year. The decrease 
is largely due to the change in non-cash working capital related to the 
change in accounts receivable and accounts payable in the quarter 
compared to the prior year. 

Cash used for investing activities in the quarter decreased to $14.4 
million compared to $17.1 million last year due to a difference in the 
timing of capital investments. 

Cash used in financing activities in the quarter was $39.3 million 
compared to $42.8 million last year. The change in long-term debt in 
the quarter is largely due to the change in the amounts drawn on the 
Company's Canadian revolving loan facilities compared to last year.  
The  Company  paid  dividends  of  $12.6  million,  an  increase  of  8.4% 
compared to the fourth quarter last year.  

Further information on the quarterly financial performance of the 
Company is provided in the interim MD&A available on the Company's 
website at www.northwest.ca or on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system 
of disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance 
that material information relating to the Company is reported to senior 
management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief 
Financial Officer (“CFO”) on a timely basis so that decisions can be made 
regarding  public  disclosure.  There  are  inherent  limitations  to  the 
effectiveness  of  any  system  of  disclosure  controls  and  procedures, 
including  the  possibility  of  human  error  and  the  circumvention  or 
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective 
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  can  only  provide  reasonable 
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on an evaluation 
of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as required by 
National  Instrument  52-109  (Certification  of  Disclosure  in  Issuers' 
Annual  and  Interim  Filings),  the  Company's  CEO  and  CFO  have 
concluded  that  these  controls  and  procedures  were  designed  and 
operated effectively as of January 31, 2013.

INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER 
FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal 
controls  over  financial  reporting  to  provide  reasonable  assurance 
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of 
financial  statements  for  external  purposes  in  accordance  with 
International  Financial  Reporting  Standards.  All  internal  control 
systems,  no  matter  how  well  designed,  have  inherent  limitations. 
Therefore, even  those  systems  determined  to  be  effective  can  only 
provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting. Based 
on  an  evaluation  of  the  Company's  internal  controls  over  financial 
reporting  using  the  framework  published  by  The  Committee  of 
Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (“COSO 
Framework”)  as  required  by  National 
Instrument  52-109,  the 
Company's CEO and CFO have concluded that the internal controls 
over financial reporting were designed and operated effectively as of 
January 31, 2013. There have been no changes in the internal controls 
over  financial  reporting  during  the  quarter  and  for  the  year  ended 
January 31, 2013 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely 
to materially affect the internal controls over financial reporting.

OUTLOOK

The  Company's  continued  focus  on  merchandise  productivity  and 
operational excellence, driven by the More Growth in Store initiatives 
described in the strategy section, are expected to provide operating 
margin  upside  within  remote  store  markets.  Overall,  consumer 
incomes  and  spending  momentum  is  expected  to  be  flat  to  2012, 
depending on the degree of improvement within the natural resource 
and tourism sectors. The Company's Giant Tiger stores are expected to 
come  under  sales  and  gross  margin  pressure  due  to  anticipated 
changes in the competitive environment from existing retailers and 
new entrants forecasted in 2013. Offsetting gains are expected from 
lower  perishable  product  waste,  improved  general  merchandise 
inventory productivity and the closure of under-performing stores in 
fiscal 2012.

Net  capital  expenditures 

for  2013  are  expected  to  be 
approximately $50 million (2012 - $48.8 million) reflecting the opening 
and  acquisition  of  new  stores,  store  replacement  projects,  energy 
efficiency  projects,  and  the 
final  phase  of  a  transportation 
management  system.  Actual  expenditures  depend  upon  the 
completion of negotiations and shipment of construction materials to 
remote  locations  and  therefore,  the  actual  amount  and  timing  of 
expenditures can fluctuate as it has over the past few years.

Following the  conversion to a  share corporation  on January  1, 
2011 and the deferral of the payment of Canadian income taxes in the 
2011 transition year in accordance with income tax legislation enacted 
November 21, 2011, the Company began paying Canadian income tax 
installments  in  2012  which  has  reduced  cash  flow  from  operating 
activities. The Company will pay the remaining balance of the accrued 
income taxes for 2012 of approximately $19 million in the first quarter 
of  2013.  The  Company  expects  its  Canadian  monthly  income  tax 
installments to increase in 2013 based on a normalized level of taxable 
income in 2012 and the recognition of a portion of the deferred taxable 
income  from  the  transition  year. These  income  tax  payments  will 
reduce cash flow from operating activities in 2013.

The adoption of new accounting standards for defined benefit 
pension plans will result in the restatement of the 2012 comparative 
numbers in the 2013 consolidated financial statements. The Company 
expects these new standards will result in a decrease in 2012 restated 
net earnings of approximately $1.260 million. Further information on 
future accounting standards is provided on page 25. 

19ANNUAL REPORT 
  
  
   
RISK MANAGEMENT

The North West Company maintains an Enterprise Risk Management 
("ERM") program which assists in identifying, evaluating and managing 
risks that may reasonably have an impact on the Company. An annual 
ERM  assessment  is  completed  to  evaluate  risks  and  the  potential 
impact that the risks may have on the Company's ability to execute its 
strategies and achieve its objectives.  The results of this assessment are 
presented to the Board of Directors who are accountable for providing 
oversight of the ERM program. 

The North West Company is exposed to a number of risks in its 
business. The  descriptions  of  the  risks  below  are  not  the  only  ones 
facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently 
known to the Company, or that the Company deems immaterial, may 
also impair the operations of the Company. If any of such risks actually 
occur,  the  business,  financial  condition,  liquidity,  and  results  of 
operations  of  the  Company  could  be  materially  adversely  affected. 
Readers  of  this  MD&A  are  also  encouraged  to  refer  to  the  Key 
Performance  Drivers  and  Capabilities  and  Outlook  sections  of  this 
MD&A,  as  well  as  North  West's  Annual  Information  Form,  which 
provides further information on the risk factors facing the Company. 
While the Company employs strategies to minimize these risks, these 
strategies do not guarantee that events or circumstances will not occur 
that could negatively impact the Company's financial condition and 
performance. Careful consideration should be given to the risk factors 
which include, but are not limited to, the following:

Business Model   The Company serves geographically diverse markets 
and sells a very wide range of products and services. Operational scale 
can  be  difficult  to  achieve  and  the  complexity  of  the  Company's 
business model is higher compared to more narrowly-focused or larger 
retailers.  Management  continuously  assesses  the  strength  of  its 
customer  value  offer  to  ensure  that  specific  market,  product  and 
service activities are attractive. Considerable attention is also given to 
streamlining processes to simplify work across the Company. To the 
extent the Company is not successful in developing and executing its 
strategies, it could have an adverse effect on the financial condition 
and performance of the Company. 

Employee Development and Retention   Attracting, retaining and 
developing high calibre employees is essential to effectively managing 
our business, executing our strategies and meeting our objectives. Due 
to the vast geography and remoteness of the Company's markets, there 
is significant competition for talent and a limited number of qualified 
personnel, particularly at the store management level. The degree to 
which  the  Company  is  not  successful  in  retaining  and  developing 
employees and establishing appropriate succession plans could lead 
to a lack of knowledge, skills and experience required to effectively run 
our  operations  and  execute  our  strategies.  The  Company's  store 
stability initiative described on page 7 is focused on having all stores 
reach  a  targeted  level  of  capability  and  stability.  In  addition  to 
compensation  programs  and  investments  in  staff  housing  that  are 
designed to attract and retain qualified personnel, the Company also 
continues to implement and refine initiatives such as comprehensive 
store-based  manager-in-training  programs  and  the  Company's  in-
depth leadership development program. 

Community Relations   A portion of the Company's sales are derived 
from  communities  and  regions  that  restrict  commercial 
land 
ownership  and  usage  by  non-indigenous  or  non-local  owned 
businesses or which have enacted policies and regulations to support 
locally-owned  businesses.  We  successfully  operate  within  these 
environments through  initiatives  that  promote positive  community 
and customer relations. These include store lease arrangements with 
community-based  development  organizations  and  initiatives  to 

recruit local residents into management positions and to incorporate 
community stakeholder advice into our business at all levels. To the 
extent  the  Company  is  not  successful  in  maintaining  positive 
community and customer relations in these locations, or is unable to 
renew lease agreements with community-based organizations, or is 
subject  to  punitive  fees  or  operating  restrictions,  it  could  have  an 
adverse effect on sales and financial performance.   

Economic  Environment      External  factors  which  affect  customer 
demand  and  personal  disposable  income,  and  over  which  the 
Company  exercises  no  influence,  include  government  fiscal  health, 
general  economic  growth,  changes  in  commodity  prices,  inflation, 
unemployment  rates,  personal  debt  levels  and  levels  of  personal 
disposable income, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Changes 
in  the  inflation  rate  are  unpredictable  and  may  impact  the  cost  of 
merchandise and the prices charged to consumers which in turn could 
negatively impact sales and net earnings. Although our core customer 
is  a  lower  income  shopper  with  relatively  stable  income  sources,  a 
decrease in government income transfer payments to individuals, a 
recession,  or  a  significant  and  prolonged  decline  in  consumer 
spending could have an adverse effect on the financial condition and 
results  of  operations.  Furthermore,  customers  in  many  of  the 
Company's  markets  benefit  from  product  cost  subsidies  through 
programs  such  as  Nutrition  North  Canada 
("NNC"),  the  U.S. 
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program ("SNAP") and the by-pass 
mail system in Alaska. A deterioration in government fiscal health could 
result  in  a  reduction  in  financial  support  for  these  programs which 
would  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  price  of  merchandise  and 
consumer  demand.  Management  regularly  monitors  economic 
conditions and considers factors which can affect customer demand 
in  making  operating  decisions  and  the  development  of  strategic 
initiatives and long-range plans.      

Consumer Income   Our largest customer segments derive most of 
their  income  directly  or  indirectly  from  government  infrastructure 
spending  or  direct  payment  to  individuals  in  the  form  of  social 
assistance, child tax benefits and old age security. These tend to be 
stable  sources  of  income,  independent  of  economic  cycles.  Other 
forms of government spending such as NNC and SNAP also contribute 
to  lower  living  costs  for  eligible  customers.  A  major  source  of 
employment  income  is  generated  from  local  government  and 
spending  on  public  infrastructure.  This  includes  housing,  schools, 
health  care  facilities,  military  facilities,  roads  and  sewers.  Local 
employment levels will fluctuate from year-to-year depending on the 
degree of infrastructure activity and a community's overall fiscal health, 
especially  near  the  end  of  the  government  budget  year.  A  similar 
fluctuating source of income is employment related to tourism and 
natural resource development. A significant or prolonged reduction in 
government transfers, subsidy programs, spending on infrastructure 
projects, natural resource development and tourism spending would 
have a negative impact on consumer income which in turn could result 
in a decrease in sales and gross profit, particularly for more discretionary 
general merchandise items.    

Competition   We have a leading market position in a large percentage 
of the markets we serve. Sustaining and growing this position depends 
on  our  ability  to  continually  improve  customer  satisfaction  while 
identifying and pursuing new sales opportunities. We actively monitor 
competitive activity and we are proactive in enhancing our value offer 
elements, ranging from in-stock position to service  and pricing. The 
entrance of new competitors, an increase in competition, both local 
and outside the community, or the introduction of new products and 
services in the Company's markets could negatively impact sales and 
financial performance. 

20THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012  
  
  
Fuel and Utility Costs   Compared to other retailers, the Company is 
more exposed to fluctuations in the price of energy, particularly  oil. 
Due  to  the  vast  geography  and  remoteness  of  the  store  network, 
expenses  related  to  aviation  fuel,  diesel-generated  electricity,  and 
heating fuel costs are a more significant component of the Company's 
and  its  customers'  expenses. To the  extent  that  escalating  fuel  and 
utility  costs  cannot  be  offset  by  alternative  energy  sources,  energy 
conservation practices or offsetting productivity gains, they may result 
in higher retail prices or lower operating margins which may affect the 
Company's  financial  performance.  In  this  scenario,  consumer  retail 
spending  will  also  be  affected  by  higher  household  energy-related 
expenses. 

Information  Technology      The  Company  relies  on  information 
technology (“IT”) to support the current and future requirements of the 
business. Any significant failure or disruption in IT systems, or the failure 
to successfully  upgrade legacy  systems or  implement  new  systems 
could have an adverse effect on the financial condition and results of 
operations.  In  2013,  the  Company  will  implement  a  transportation 
management system (“TMS”). Failure by the Company to successfully 
implement  this  system  could  cause  disruption  in  the  flow  of 
merchandise to the stores, which could negatively affect the reputation 
and financial performance of the Company. Furthermore, the failure to 
integrate the TMS with other IT systems and implement appropriate 
processes to support the TMS may result in failing to capture planned 
efficiency and effectiveness gains. To mitigate these risks, the Company 
has  engaged  an  implementation  partner  and  instilled  a  strong 
governance structure and disciplined project management.   

Food Safety   The Company is exposed to risks associated with food 
safety and product handling. Food sales represent approximately 77% 
of total Company sales. A significant outbreak of a food-borne illness 
or increased public concerns with certain food products could have 
an adverse effect on the financial performance and reputation of the 
Company. The Company has food preparation, handling and storage 
procedures  which  help  mitigate  these  risks. The  Company  also  has 
product recall procedures in place in the event of a food-borne illness 
outbreak. The existence of these procedures does not eliminate the 
underlying risks and the ability of these procedures to mitigate risk in 
the  event  of  a  food-borne  illness  is  dependent  on  their  successful 
execution.     

Income Taxes   The Company accounts for income taxes using the 
liability method of tax allocation. Under the liability method, deferred 
income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  determined  based  on  the 
differences between the financial statement carrying  values and tax 
bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using substantively 
enacted  tax  rates  and  laws  that  are expected  to  be  in  effect  in  the 
periods  in  which  the  deferred  income  tax  assets  or  liabilities  are 
expected to be realized or settled. The provision for income taxes is 
recorded in the Company at applicable statutory rates. 

In  the  ordinary  course  of  business,  the  Company  is  subject  to 
ongoing audits by tax authorities. While the Company believes that its 
tax  filing  positions  are  appropriate  and  supportable,  the  possibility 
exists that certain matters may be reviewed and challenged by the tax 
authorities. The Company regularly reviews the potential for adverse 
outcomes  and  the  adequacy  of  its  tax  provisions.  The  Company 
believes that it has adequately provided for these matters. If the final 
outcome  differs  materially  from  the  tax  provisions,  the  Company's 
income tax expense and its earnings could be affected positively or 
negatively in the period in which the matters are resolved. 

Laws, Regulations and Standards   The Company is subject to various 
laws and regulations administered by federal, provincial and foreign 
regulatory authorities, including but not limited to income, commodity 

and other taxes, duties, currency repatriation, zoning, health and safety, 
employment standards, privacy laws and licensing requirements. New 
accounting standards and pronouncements or changes in accounting 
standards, may also impact the Company's financial results. These laws, 
regulations and standards and their interpretation by various courts 
and agencies are subject to change. In the course of complying with 
such changes, the Company may incur significant costs. Failure by the 
Company  to  fully  comply  with  applicable  laws,  regulations  and 
standards could result in financial penalties, assessments, sanctions, or 
legal action that could have an adverse effect on the reputation and 
the financial performance of the Company. 

Vendor  and  Third  Party  Service  Partner  Management      The 
Company relies on a broad base of manufacturers, suppliers, logistics 
service  providers  and  operators  of  distribution  facilities  to  provide 
goods  and  services.  Events  or  disruptions  affecting  these  suppliers 
outside of the Company's control could in turn result in delays in the 
delivery of merchandise to the stores and therefore negatively impact 
financial performance. A portion of the merchandise the Company sells 
is purchased offshore. Offshore sourcing could provide products that 
contain harmful or banned substances or do not meet the required 
standards. The  Company  uses  offshore  consolidators  and  sourcing 
agents to monitor product quality and reduce the risk of sub-standard 
products  however,  there  is  no  certainty  that  these  risks  can  be 
completely mitigated in all circumstances.     

Environmental   The Company owns a large number of facilities and 
real  estate,  particularly 
in  remote  locations,  and  is  subject  to 
environmental risks associated with the contamination of such facilities 
and properties. The Company operates gasoline dispensing units in a 
number  of  locations  and  also  uses  fuel  to heat  stores and  housing. 
Contamination resulting from gasoline and heating fuel is possible. The 
Company  employs  operating,  training,  monitoring  and  testing 
procedures to minimize the risk of contamination. The Company also 
operates refrigeration equipment in its stores and distribution centers 
which, if the equipment fails, could release gases that may be harmful 
to the environment. The Company has monitoring and preventative 
maintenance  procedures  to  reduce  the  risk  of  this  contamination 
occurring. Even with these risk mitigation policies and procedures, the 
Company  could  incur  increased  or  unexpected  costs  related  to 
including 
environmental 
litigation and regulatory compliance costs, all of which could have an 
adverse effect on the reputation and financial condition and financial 
performance of the Company.    

remediation  activities, 

incidents  and 

Management of Inventory   Success in the retail industry depends 
on being able to select the right merchandise, in the correct quantities 
in proportion to the demand for such merchandise. A miscalculation 
of consumer demand for merchandise could result in having excess 
inventory for some products and missed sales opportunities for others. 
Excess  inventory  may  result  in  higher  markdowns  or  inventory 
shrinkage  all of which could have an adverse effect on the financial 
performance of the Company.  

Insurance      The  Company  manages  its  exposure  to  certain  risks 
through  an  integrated  insurance  program  which  combines  an 
appropriate  level  of  self-insurance  and  the  purchase  of  various 
insurance  policies. The  Company's  insurance  program  is  based  on 
various  lines  and  limits  of  coverage.  Insurance  is  arranged  with 
financially  stable  insurance  companies  as  rated  by  the  professional 
rating  agencies.  There  is  no  guarantee  that  any  given  risk  will  be 
mitigated  in  all  circumstances  or  that  the  Company will  be  able  to 
continue to purchase this insurance coverage at reasonable rates.  

21ANNUAL REPORT   
  
Climate   The Company's operations are exposed to extreme weather 
conditions ranging from blizzards to hurricanes, typhoons, cyclones, 
and tsunamis which can cause loss of life, damage to or destruction of 
key stores and facilities, or temporary business disruptions. The stores 
located in the South Pacific, Caribbean and coastal areas of Alaska are 
also at risk of earthquakes which can result in loss of life and destruction 
of  assets. Such  losses  could  have an  adverse effect  on  the  financial 
condition  and  performance  of  the  Company.  Global  warming 
conditions would also have a more pronounced effect, both positive 
and negative, on the Company's most northern latitude stores.          

Post-Employment  Benefits     The  Company  engages  professional 
investment  advisors  to  manage  the  assets  in  the  defined  benefit 
pension plans. The performance of the Company's pension plans and 
the plan funding requirements are impacted by the returns on plan 
assets,  changes 
in  the  discount  rate  and  regulatory  funding 
requirements. If capital market returns are below the level estimated 
by management, or if the discount rate used to value the liabilities of 
the  plans  decreases,  the  Company  may  be  required  to  make 
contributions to its defined benefit pension plans in excess of those 
currently  contemplated,  which  may  have  an  adverse  effect  on  the 
Company's financial condition and performance. 

The Company regularly monitors and assesses the performance 
of the pension plan assets and the impact of changes in capital markets, 
changes in plan member demographics, and other economic factors 
that  may  impact  funding  requirements, benefit  plan  expenses  and 
actuarial assumptions. The Company makes cash contributions to the 
pension  plan  as  required  and  also  uses  letters  of  credit  to  satisfy  a 
portion  of  its  funding  obligations.  Effective  January  1,  2011,  the 
Company entered into an amended and restated staff pension plan 
and added a defined contribution plan. Under the amended pension 
plan, all members who did not meet a qualifying threshold based on 
number of years in the pension plan and age were transitioned to the 
defined contribution pension plan effective January  1, 2011 and no 
longer accumulate years of service under the defined benefit pension 
plan. Further information on post-employment benefits is provided on 
page 16 and in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements. 

Ethical  Business  Conduct      The  Company  has  a  Code  of  Business 
Conduct  and  Ethics  policy  which  governs  both  employees  and 
Directors. The Business Ethics Committee monitors compliance with 
the  Code  of  Business  Conduct  and  Ethics. The  Company also  has  a 
Whistleblower policy that provides direct access to members of the 
Board  of  Directors.  Unethical  business  conduct  could  negatively 
impact the Company's reputation and relationship with its customers, 
investors, and employees, which in turn could have an adverse effect 
on the financial performance of the Company.

Geopolitical      Changes  in  the  domestic  or  international  political 
environment may impact the Company's ability to source and provide 
products and services. Acts of terrorism, riots, and political instability, 
especially in less developed markets, could have an adverse effect on 
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       

Litigation   In the normal course of business, the Company is subject 
to  a  number  of  claims  and  legal  actions  that  may  be  made  by  its 
customers,  suppliers  and  others.    If  management  believes  the 
Company has liability for such claim or legal action, provisions are made 
in the Company's financial statements. If management's assessment 
of liability or the amount of any such claim is incorrect, or the Company 
is unsuccessful in defending its position, any difference between the 
judgment  or  penalty  amount  and  the  provision  would  become  an 
expense or a recovery in the period such claim was resolved.

Financial Services Business   The financial services operations are a 
part of the business of the Company. There is a risk of customer defaults 
on credit accounts, particularly following deterioration in the economy. 
The credit card industry  is highly competitive and other credit card 
issuers may seek to expand or to enter the Company's markets. New 
federal, provincial and state laws, and amendments to existing laws, 
may be enacted to further regulate the credit card industry or to reduce 
finance  charges  or  other  fees  or  charges  applicable  to  credit  card 
accounts. Deterioration in the financial services business could have 
an  adverse  effect  on  the  financial  condition  or  performance  of  the 
Company. 

Dependence on Key Facilities   There are six major distribution centres 
which  are  located  in  Winnipeg,  Manitoba;  Anchorage,  Alaska;  San 
Leandro,  California;  Port  of  Tacoma,  Washington;  and  third  party 
managed facilities in Edmonton, Alberta and Miami, Florida. In addition, 
the  Company's  Canadian  Operations  support  office  is  located  in 
Winnipeg,  Manitoba  and  the  International  Operations  has  support 
offices  in  Anchorage,  Alaska  and  Bellevue,  Washington.  A  serious 
disruption at any of these facilities or those of any of the corporate 
alliance  partners  due  to fire, inclement  weather or  otherwise  could 
have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  financial  condition  or 
performance of the Company.

Financial Risks   In the normal course of business, the Company is 
exposed to financial risks that have the potential to negatively impact 
its financial performance. The Company manages financial risk  with 
oversight provided by the Board of Directors, who also approve specific 
financial  transactions.  The  Company  uses  derivative 
financial 
instruments only to hedge exposures arising in respect of underlying 
business requirements and not for speculative purposes. These risks 
and the actions taken to minimize the risks are described below. Further 
information on the Company's financial instruments and associated 
risks are provided in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements. 

Credit Risk   Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a 
customer  or  counterparty  to  a  financial  instrument  fails  to  meet  its 
contractual obligations. The Company is exposed to credit risk primarily 
in  relation  to  individual  and  commercial  accounts  receivable.  The 
Company  manages  credit  risk  by  performing 
regular  credit 
assessments of its customers and provides allowances for potentially 
uncollectible  accounts receivable. The Company does not have any 
individual  customer  accounts  greater  than  10%  of  total  accounts 
receivable.           

Liquidity Risk   Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be 
able to meet its financial obligations as they come due or can do so 
only  at  excessive  cost.  The  Company  manages  liquidity  risk  by 
maintaining adequate credit facilities to fund operating requirements 
and sustaining and planned growth-related capital expenditures and 
regularly monitoring actual and forecasted cash flow and debt levels. 
At January 31, 2013, the Company had undrawn committed revolving 
loan  facilities  available  of  $144.1  million  (January 31,  2012  -  $126.4 
million). 

The Company's International Operations has a US$52 million loan 
facility  that  matures  December  31,  2013.  The  Company  does  not 
anticipate any difficulty in refinancing this loan facility however, global 
economic conditions can change which may negatively impact the 
availability  of  credit,  interest  rates  and  covenants  for  companies 
seeking to refinance debt. To the extent that the Company cannot meet 
its obligations or refinance its debt when it comes due, or can only do 
so at an excessive cost, this may have an adverse effect on the financial 
condition  and  financial  performance  of  the  Company.  For  further 
information on loan facilities, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial 
statements.

22THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012Currency Risk   Currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash 
flows of  a  financial  instrument  will  fluctuate  because  of  changes  in 
foreign  exchange  rates. The  Company  is  exposed  to  currency  risk, 
primarily  the  U.S. dollar, through  its  net  investment in  International 
Operations and its U.S. dollar denominated borrowings. The Company 
manages its exposure to currency risk by hedging the net investment 
in  foreign  operations  with  a  portion  of  U.S.  dollar  denominated 
borrowings as described in the Sources of Liquidity section on page 
16.  At  January  31,  2013,  the  Company  had  US$111.3  million  in  U.S. 
denominated debt compared to US$107.2 million at January 31, 2012. 
Further information on the impact of foreign exchange rates on the 
translation  of  U.S.  denominated  debt  is  provided  in  the  Capital 
Structure section on page 18.

The  Company  is  also  exposed  to  currency  risk  relating  to  the 
translation  of  International  Operations  earnings  from  U.S. dollars  to 
Canadian dollars. In 2012, the average exchange rate used to translate 
U.S.  denominated  earnings  from  the  International  Operations  was 
relatively flat at 0.998 compared to 0.991 last year. The Canadian dollar's 
depreciation  versus  the  U.S.  dollar  in  2011  positively  impacted 
consolidated  net  earnings  by  $0.1  million.  In  2011,  the  average 
exchange  rate  of  0.991  was  3.4%  lower  than  the  1.026  average 
exchange  rate  in  2010  which  decreased  2011  consolidated  net 
earnings by $0.4 million compared to 2010.

Interest Rate Risk   Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or 
future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate  because of 
changes in market interest rates. The Company is exposed to interest 
rate  risk  primarily  through  its  long-term  borrowings. The  Company 
manages  exposure  to  interest  rate  risk  by  using  a  combination  of 
interest rate swaps and a mixture of fixed and floating interest rate debt. 
Additional  information  regarding  interest  rate  swaps  is  provided  in 
Note 11 and Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  IFRS 
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect 
the  reported  amounts  and  disclosures  made  in  the  consolidated 
financial  statements  and  accompanying  notes.  Management 
continually  evaluates  the  estimates  and  assumptions  it  uses. These 
estimates  and  assumptions  are  based  on  management's  historical 
experience,  knowledge  of  current  events,  expectations  of  future 
outcomes and other factors that management considers reasonable 
under  the  circumstances.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  these 
estimates as confirming events occur. The estimates and assumptions 
described  in  this  section  depend  upon  subjective  or  complex 
judgments about matters that may be uncertain and changes in these 
estimates and assumptions could materially impact the consolidated 
financial statements.  

Valuation  of  Accounts  Receivable    The  Company  records  an 
allowance for doubtful accounts related to accounts receivable that 
may potentially be impaired. The allowance is based on the aging of 
the  accounts  receivable, our  knowledge  of  our  customers' financial 
condition, the current business environment and historical experience. 
A significant change in one or more of these factors could impact the 
estimated  allowances  for  doubtful  accounts  recorded 
in  the 
consolidated balance sheet and the provisions for debt loss recorded 
in the consolidated statement of earnings. Additional information on 
the valuation of accounts receivable is provided in Note 5 and the credit 
risk section in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

Valuation of Inventories  Retail inventories are stated at the lower of 
cost  and  net  realizable  value.  Significant  estimation  or  judgment  is 

required in the determination of: (1) discount factors used to convert 
inventory to cost after a physical count at retail has been completed; 
(2) recognizing merchandise for which the customer's perception of 
value has declined and appropriately marking the retail value of the 
merchandise  down  to  the  perceived  value;  and  (3)  estimating 
inventory  losses,  or  shrinkage,  occurring  between  the  last  physical 
count and the balance sheet date.

Food  inventories  counted  at  retail  are  converted  to  cost  by 
applying a discount factor to retail selling prices. This discount factor 
is calculated in relation to historical gross margins and is reviewed on 
a regular basis for reasonableness. General merchandise inventories 
counted at retail are converted to cost by applying average cost factors 
by  merchandise  category. These  cost  factors  represent the  average 
cost-to-retail ratio for each merchandise category based on beginning 
inventory and purchases made throughout the year.

Inventory shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales for the 
period from the date of the last physical inventory count to the balance 
sheet date. The estimate is based on experience and the most recent 
physical inventory results. To the extent that actual losses experienced 
vary from those estimated, both inventories and cost of sales may be 
impacted.

Changes or differences in these estimates may result in changes 
to inventories on the consolidated balance sheet and a charge or credit 
to cost of sales in the consolidated statement of earnings. Additional 
information  regarding  inventories  is  provided  in  Note  6  to  the 
consolidated financial statements. 

Post-Employment  Benefits    The  cost  and  defined  benefit  plan 
obligations  of  the  Company's  defined  benefit  pension  plans  are 
accrued  based  on  actuarial  valuations  which  are  dependent  on 
assumptions determined by management. These assumptions include 
the discount rate used to calculate benefit plan obligations, expected 
long-term rate of return on plan assets, rate of compensation increase, 
retirement ages, and mortality rates. These assumptions are reviewed 
by management and the Company's actuaries.

The  discount  rate  used  to  calculate  benefit  plan  obligations,  
expected  long-term  rate  of  return  on  plan  assets  and  the  rate  of 
compensation increase are the three most significant assumptions. The 
discount rate used to calculate benefit plan obligations is based on 
market  interest  rates,  as  at  the  Company's  measurement  date  of 
January 31, 2013 on a portfolio of Corporate AA bonds with terms to 
maturity that, on average, matches the terms of the defined benefit 
plan obligations. The discount rates used to measure the benefit plan 
obligations for fiscal 2012 and 2011 were 4.3% and 4.5% respectively. 
The  expected  long-term  rate  of  return  on  plan  assets  is  based  on 
historical  returns,  the  asset  mix  and  current  investment  yields. The 
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for fiscal 2012 and 
2011  was  6.5%.  Management  assumed  the  rate  of  compensation 
increase for fiscal 2012 and 2011 at 4%.

These assumptions may change in the future and may result in 
material  changes  in  the  defined  benefit  plan  obligation  on  the 
Company's  consolidated  balance  sheet,  the  defined  benefit  plan 
expense  on  the  consolidated  statement  of  earnings  and  the  net 
actuarial  gains  or  losses  recognized  in  comprehensive  income  and 
retained  earnings.  Changes  in  financial  market  returns  and  interest 
rates could also result in changes to the funding requirements of the 
Company's  defined  benefit  pension  plans.  Additional  information 
regarding  the  Company's  post-employment  benefits  is  provided  in 
Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

Impairment  of  Long-lived  Assets    The  Company  assesses  the 
recoverability of  values  assigned  to  long-lived  assets  quarterly  after 
considering potential impairment indicated by such factors as business 
and market trends, future prospects, current market value and other 
economic  factors.  If  there  is  an  indication  of  impairment,  the 

23ANNUAL REPORT 
 
 
Changes or differences in these estimates or assumptions may 
result in changes to the current or deferred income tax balances on 
the  consolidated  balance  sheet,  a  charge  or  credit  to  income  tax 
expense in the consolidated statement of earnings and may result in 
cash payments or receipts. Additional information on income taxes is 
provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.

recoverable amount of the asset, which is the higher of its fair value 
less costs to sell and its value in use, is estimated in order to determine 
the extent of the impairment loss.  Where the asset does not generate 
cash  flows  that  are  independent  from  other  assets,  the  Company 
estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit (CGU) 
to  which  the  asset  belongs.  For  tangible  and  intangible  assets 
excluding  goodwill,  the  CGU  is  the  smallest  group  of  assets  that 
generates  cash 
largely 
independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets. 
Any impairment charge is recognized in the consolidated statement 
of  earnings  in  the  period  in  which  it  occurs,  to  the  extent  that  the 
carrying value exceeds its recoverable amount.

inflows  from  continuing  use  that  are 

The  underlying  estimates  for  cash  flows  include  estimates  for 
future sales, gross margin rates and store expenses, and are based upon 
the stores' past and expected future performance. Changes which may 
impact future cash flows include, but are not limited to, competition, 
general  economic  conditions  and  unrecoverable 
in 
operating costs. To the extent that management's estimates are not 
realized, future assessments could result in impairment charges that 
may have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated balance 
sheet and consolidated statement of earnings.

increases 

Goodwill  Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to an impairment 
test  annually  and  whenever  indicators  of  impairment  are  detected. 
Goodwill is allocated to CGU's that are expected to benefit from the 
synergies  of  the  related  business  combination  and  represents  the 
lowest level within the Company at which goodwill is monitored for 
internal management purposes, which is the Company's International 
Operating segment before aggregation.

The value of the goodwill was tested by means of comparing the 
recoverable amount of the operating segment to its carrying value. To 
calculate the operating segment's recoverable amount, the Company 
uses  the  capitalized earnings  method. The  product  of  maintainable 
earnings  and  a  capitalization  rate  are  used  to  determine  the 
recoverable  amount.  The  capitalization  rate 
is  based  on  the 
International  Operations  weighted-average  cost  of  capital.  Key 
assumptions  in  the  capitalization  rate  include:  equity  risk  premium, 
debt-to-equity ratio, pre-tax cost of debt capital and company specific 
risk  premium. To  the  extent  that  management's  estimates  are  not 
realized, future assessments could result in impairment charges that 
may have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated balance 
sheet and consolidated statement of earnings.

The Company performed the annual goodwill impairment test in 
2012 and determined that the recoverable amount of the International 
Operations  operating  segment  exceeded  its  carrying  value.  No 
goodwill impairment was identified and management considers any 
reasonably  foreseeable  changes  in  key  assumptions  unlikely  to 
produce a goodwill impairment.

Income Taxes  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the 
future income tax consequences attributable to temporary differences 
between the financial statement carrying values of assets and liabilities 
and their respective income tax bases. Deferred income tax assets or 
liabilities are measured using enacted or substantively enacted income 
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which 
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. 
The  calculation  of  current  and  deferred  income  taxes  requires 
management to make estimates and assumptions and to exercise a 
certain  amount  of  judgment  regarding  the  financial  statement 
carrying values of assets and liabilities which are subject to accounting 
estimates inherent in those balances. The deferred income tax assets 
and liabilities are also impacted by the interpretation of income tax 
legislation  across  various  jurisdictions,  expectations  about  future 
financial results and the timing of reversal of temporary  differences, 
and possible audits of tax filings by the regulatory agencies.

24THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
 
Financial Instruments   The IASB has issued a new standard which will 
eventually  replace  IAS  39,  Financial  Instruments:  Recognition  and 
Measurement.  The development of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments is a 
multi-phase project with a goal of improving and simplifying financial 
instrument  reporting.    IFRS  9  uses  a  single  approach  to  determine 
measurement of a financial asset based on how an entity  manages 
financial impairment, replacing the multiple classification options in 
IAS 39 with only two categories: amortized cost and fair value through 
profit or loss.  This standard is effective for the Company’s financial year 
beginning February 1, 2015.  The Company is currently assessing the 
impact of changes to this standard.

Presentation  of  Financial  Statements      The  IASB  has  amended  IAS  1, 
Presentation of  Financial Statements  to  enhance  the  presentation  of 
Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).  These amendments require the 
components of OCI to be presented separately for items that may be 
reclassified  to  the  statement  of  earnings  from  those  that  remain  in 
equity.  This standard is not expected to have a significant impact on 
the consolidated financial statements.

  IFRS  13,  Fair  Value  Measurement 

Fair  Value  Measurement 
is  a 
comprehensive standard for fair value measurement and disclosure 
requirements for use across all IFRS.  The new standard clarifies that fair 
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to 
in  an  orderly  transaction  between  market 
transfer  a 
participants, at the measurement date.  It also establishes disclosures 
about fair value measurement.  This standard is not expected to have 
a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

liability 

Financial Instruments      The  IASB  has  issued  amendments  to  IFRS  7, 
Financial  Instruments:  Disclosures  and  IAS  32,  Financial  Instruments: 
Presentation  which  clarify  the  requirements  for  offsetting  financial 
assets and financial liabilities along with new disclosure requirements.  
These  amendments  are  effective  for  the  Company’s  financial  years 
beginning February 1, 2014 and February 1, 2013 respectively.  These 
standards  are  not  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on  the 
consolidated financial statements.

FUTURE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The  Company  is  currently  assessing  the  impact  of  the  following 
standards that may apply in future periods.  Unless otherwise noted, 
the following revised standards and amendments are effective for the 
Company's annual periods beginning February 1, 2013.  

Consolidated  Financial  Statements      The  International  Accounting 
Standards  Board  ("IASB")  issued  IFRS  10,  Consolidated  Financial 
Statements  replacing  portions  of  IAS  27,  Consolidated  and  Separate 
Financial  Statements  addressing  consolidation  and  superseding 
Standing  Interpretations  Committee  (SIC)  Interpretation    12  in  its 
entirety.    IFRS  10  establishes  principles  for  the  presentation  and 
preparation  of  consolidated  financial  statements  when  an  entity 
controls one or more other entities.  This standard is not expected to 
have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Joint  Arrangements      The  IASB  issued  IFRS  11,  Joint  Arrangements 
superseding  IAS  31,  Interest  in  Joint  Ventures  and  SIC-13,  Jointly 
Controlled Entities – Non Monetary Contributions by Venturers.  IFRS 11 
establishes principles for determining the type of joint arrangement by 
assessing the venturers’ rights and obligations.  This standard provides 
guidance for financial reporting activities required by entities that have 
an interest in a jointly controlled arrangement.  Joint ventures will be 
accounted for using the equity method of accounting, whereas for a 
joint operation the venturer will recognize its share of the ventures' 
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.  The adoption of IFRS 11 is not 
expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial 
statements.

Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities   The IASB issued IFRS 12, Disclosure 
of Interests in Other Entities requiring extensive disclosures relating to a 
company’s  interest  in  subsidiaries,  associates  and  certain  other 
arrangements.  IFRS 12 enables financial statement users to evaluate 
the nature and risks associated with these interests, and evaluate their 
effect on the Company’s financial performance.  This standard is not 
expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial 
statements.

Employee benefits   The revised IAS 19, Employee Benefits issued by the 
IASB eliminates the option to defer the recognition of actuarial gains 
and losses on defined benefit plans. It amends the calculation of plan 
assets and benefit obligations, streamlines the presentation of changes 
in  defined  benefit  plans  and  requires  enhanced  disclosure.    The 
requirement to calculate the expected return on plan assets with the 
interest rate used to calculate the defined benefit plan obligation is the 
most  significant  for  the  Company.  The  Company  will  adopt  this 
standard  for  its  fiscal  year  beginning  February  1,  2013.    The 
implementation  of  this  standard  in  the  Company's  2013  financial 
statements  will  require  the  restatement  of  the  2012  comparative 
numbers with an estimated decrease in net earnings of $1.260 million 
comprised  of  an  increase  to  interest  expense  of  $1.170  million,  an 
increase to selling, operating and administrative expenses of $0.550 
million and a deferred tax recovery of $0.460 million.

25ANNUAL REPORT  
    
 
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

(1) Trading Profit (EBITDA)  is not a recognized measure under IFRS. 
Management believes that in addition to net earnings, trading profit 
is  a  useful  supplemental  measure  as  it  provides  investors  with  an 
indication  of  the  Company's  operational  performance  before 
allocating the cost of interest, income taxes and capital investments. 
Investors should be cautioned however, that trading profit should not 
be  construed  as  an  alternative  to  net  earnings  determined  in 
accordance with IFRS as an indicator of the Company's performance. 
The Company's method of calculating trading profit may differ from 
other companies and may not be comparable to measures used by 
other  companies.  A  reconciliation  of  consolidated  net  earnings  to 
trading profit or EBITDA is provided below:

(3) Return on Net Assets (RONA)  is not a recognized measure under 
IFRS.  Management believes that RONA is a useful measure to evaluate 
the financial return on the net assets used in the business. RONA is 
calculated as earnings from operations (EBIT)  for the year divided by 
average monthly net assets.  The following table reconciles net assets 
used in the RONA calculation to IFRS measures reported in the audited 
consolidated financial statements as at January 31:

($ in thousands)

Total assets

Less:

Current liabilities

2012

2011

2010

$

651.4

$

626.9

$

616.6

(149.8)

(42.0)

(127.4)

(39.9)

(117.1)

(20.4)

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Trading Profit (EBITDA)

   Other long-term liabilities

($ in thousands)

Net earnings

Add:

Amortization

Interest expense

Income taxes

2012

2011

2010

$ 65,148

$

57,961

$

69,656

37,149

5,809

26,161

36,572

6,026

25,322

35,492

6,077

14,539

Net Assets Employed

$

459.6

$

459.6

$

479.1

(4) Return on Average Equity (ROE)  is not a recognized measure 
under  IFRS.  Management  believes  that  ROE  is  a  useful  measure  to 
evaluate the financial return on the amount invested by shareholders. 
ROE  is  calculated  by  dividing  net  earnings  for  the  year  by  average 
monthly total shareholders' equity. There is no directly comparable IFRS 
measure for return on equity.

Trading profit (EBITDA)

$ 134,267

$ 125,881

$ 125,764

For  trading  profit  information  by  business  segment,  see  Note  4 
“Segmented  Information” in  the  notes  to  the  consolidated  financial 
statements.

(2) Earnings From Operations (EBIT)  is not a recognized measure 
under IFRS. Management believes that EBIT is a useful measure as it 
provides  investors  with  an  indication  of  the  performance  of  the 
consolidated operations and/or business segments, prior to interest 
expense and income taxes. Investors should be cautioned however, 
that EBIT should not be construed as an alternative to net earnings 
determined in accordance with IFRS as an indicator of the Company's 
performance. The Company's method of calculating EBIT may differ 
from other companies and may not be comparable to measures used 
by other companies. A reconciliation of consolidated net earnings to 
EBIT is provided below:

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBIT

($ in thousands)

Net earnings

Add:

Interest expense

Income taxes

2012

2011

2010

$ 65,148

$

57,961

$ 69,656

5,809

26,161

6,026

25,322

6,077

14,539

Earnings from operations (EBIT)

$ 97,118

$

89,309

$ 90,272

For earnings from operations (EBIT) information by business segment, 
see Note 4 “Segmented Information” in the notes to the consolidated 
financial statements.

26THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Basic  earnings  per  share    Net  earnings  available  to  shareholders 
divided  by  the  weighted-average  number  of  shares  outstanding 
during the period. 

Hedge  A risk management technique used to manage interest rate, 
foreign currency exchange or other exposures arising from business 
transactions.

Basis point  A unit of measure that is equal to 1/100th of one percent. 

Interest coverage   Net earnings  before interest and income taxes 
divided by interest expense.    

CGAAP (Canadian generally accepted accounting principles)  The 
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years 2009 and prior 
were  prepared  in  accordance  with  Canadian  generally  accepted 
accounting principles as issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered 
Accountants. 

Compound Annual  Growth Rate  (CAGR)   The  compound  annual 
growth rate is the year-over-year percentage growth rate over a given 
period of time.   

Control label or Private label  A brand or related trademark that is 
owned by the Company for use in connection with its own products 
and services. 

Debt loss  An expense resulting from the estimated loss on potentially 
uncollectible accounts receivable.  

Debt covenants  Restrictions written into banking facilities and senior 
notes and loan agreements that prohibit the Company from taking 
actions that may negatively impact the interests of the lenders.  

Debt-to-equity ratio  Provides information on the proportion of debt 
and  equity  the  Company  is  using  to  finance  its  operations  and 
calculated by total debt divided by shareholders' equity.  

Diluted earnings per share  The amount of net earnings for the period 
available to shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of 
shares  outstanding  during  the  period  including  the  impact  of  all 
potential dilutive outstanding shares at the end of the period. 

Earnings from operations (EBIT)  Net earnings before interest and 
income taxes provides an indication of the Company's performance 
prior to interest expense and income taxes.  See Non-GAAP financial 
measures on page 26.  

EBIT margin  EBIT divided by sales.

Fair value  The amount of consideration that would be agreed upon 
in an arm's length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties 
who are under no compulsion to act.   

Gross profit  Sales less cost of goods sold and inventory shrinkage.  

Gross profit rate  Gross profit divided by sales. 

IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards)  Effective for the 
2011 fiscal year, the consolidated financial statements were prepared 
in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  as 
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Comparative 
financial  information  for  the  year  ended  January  31,  2011  (“2010”) 
previously reported in the consolidated financial statements prepared 
in accordance with CGAAP has been restated in accordance with the 
accounting  policies  and  financial  statement  presentation  adopted 
under IFRS.     

Return  on  equity    Net  earnings  divided  by  average  shareholders' 
equity.  

Return on net assets  Net earnings before interest and income taxes 
divided  by  average  net  assets  employed  (average  total  assets  less 
accounts  payable and  accrued  liabilities, income  taxes payable and 
asset retirement obligations).      

Same store sales  Retail sales from stores that have been open more 
than 52 weeks in the periods being compared.    

Trading profit (EBITDA)  Net earnings before interest, income taxes, 
indication  of  the 
depreciation  and  amortization  provides  an 
Company's  operational  performance  before  allocating  the  cost  of 
interest, income taxes and capital investments.  
See Non-GAAP financial measures on page 26.  

Trading profit margin  Trading profit divided by sales.

Working capital  Total current assets less total current liabilities. 

Year  The fiscal year ends on January 31. The 2012 year which ended 
January 31, 2013 had 366 days of operations as a result of February 29th. 
The  2011  year  which  ended  January  31,  2012  had  365  days  of 
operations. The 2010 year which ended January 31, 2011 had 365 days 
of operations. The 2009 year which ended January 31, 2010 had 365 
days of operations. The 2008 year which ended January 31, 2009 had 
366 days of operations as a result of the February 29 leap year.  

27ANNUAL REPORT  
 
         
  
Eleven-Year Financial Summary

Fiscal Year(1)
($ in thousands )
Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Sales  - Canadian Operations
Sales  - International Operations
Sales  - Total
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - Canadian Operations
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - International Operations
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - Total Operations
Amortization - Canadian Operations
Amortization - International Operations
Amortization - Total
Interest
Income tax provision
Net earnings
Cash flow from operating activities
Dividends/distributions paid during the year
Capital expenditures
Net change in cash
Consolidated Balance Sheets

Current assets
Property and equipment
Other assets, intangible assets and goodwill
Deferred tax assets
Current liabilities
Long-term debt and other liabilities
Equity
Consolidated Dollar Per Share/Unit ($)(5)

Net earnings - basic
Net earnings - diluted
Trading  profit(3),(4)
Cash flow from operating activities(4)
Dividends/distributions paid during the year(4)
Equity at end of fiscal year (basic shares/units outstanding)
Market price at January 31
Statistics at Year End

Number of stores - Canadian
Number of stores - International
Selling square feet (000's) end of year - Canadian Stores
Selling square feet (000's) end of year - International Stores
Sales per average selling square foot - Canadian
Sales per average selling square foot - International
Number of employees - Canadian Operations
Number of employees - International Operations
Average shares/units outstanding (000's)
Shares/Units outstanding at end of fiscal year (000's)
Shares/Units traded during the year (000's)
Financial Ratios
Trading profit(3) (%)
Earnings from operations(3) (EBIT) (%)
Total return on net assets(3) (%)
Return on average equity(3) (%)
Debt-to-equity
Dividends/distributions as % of cash flow from operating activities
Inventory turnover (times)
(1)  The fiscal year changed from the last Saturday in January to January 31 effective
       January 31, 2007.  Each year includes 52 weeks of operations with the exception
      of 2003, which had 53 weeks of operations.

IFRS (2)
2012

IFRS (2)
2011

IFRS (2)
2010

2009

2008

2007

$1,043,050
470,596
1,513,646
107,060
27,207
134,267
29,155
7,994
37,149
5,809
26,161
65,148
128,992
50,320
51,133
11,691

$ 303,896
274,027
60,567
12,904
190,184
164,960
296,250

$1,028,396
466,740
1,495,136
97,998
27,883
125,881
28,745
7,827
36,572
6,026
25,322
57,961
115,469
50,797
46,376
(4,247)

$ 295,836
270,370
53,289
7,422
128,002
215,206
283,709

$ 978,662
469,442
1,448,104
98,781
26,983
125,764
27,511
7,981
35,492
6,077
14,539
69,656
114,564
68,700
35,225
3,953

$ 284,789
259,583
55,199
17,017
185,377
144,736
286,475

$ 921,621
522,745
1,444,366
96,599
33,675
130,274
26,727
8,423
35,150
5,470
7,841
81,813
107,973
67,245
45,294
1,548

$ 285,843
258,928
73,177
5,852
171,946
161,928
289,926

$ 899,263
493,371
1,392,634
90,606
31,651
122,257
24,501
7,553
32,054
8,307
6,518
75,378
90,178
67,730
46,118
3,998

$ 285,088
248,856
68,632
6,597
172,216
162,547
274,410

$ 852,773
211,717
1,064,490
87,410
19,147
106,557
22,634
4,316
26,950
7,465
9,151
62,991
93,591
54,667
44,409
(368)

$ 254,061
223,397
50,492
1,720
134,899
138,470
256,301

$

$
$

1.35
1.34
2.78
2.67
1.04
6.12
23.14

177
46
1,375
660
734
716
4,768
1,568
48,384
48,389
13,539

8.9
6.4
20.7
22.5
.55:1
39.0
5.8

$

$
$

1.20
1.19
2.60
2.39
1.05
5.86
19.40

183
46
1,466
655
702
713
5,233
1,668
48,378
48,378
22,418

8.4
6.0
18.5
20.1
.62:1
44.0
5.7

$

$
$

1.45
1.44
2.61
2.38
1.42
5.92
21.09

184
46
1,445
654
682
718
5,301
1,601
48,180
48,378
24,814

8.7
6.2
17.9
24.1
.67:1
60.0
5.6

$

$
$

1.71
1.69
2.73
2.26
1.39
6.04
17.94

180
46
1,423
653
654
752
5,358
1,545
47,799
48,017
20,080

9.0
6.6
18.7
29.3
.72:1
62.3
5.6

$

$
$

1.58
1.56
2.56
1.89
1.40
5.75
16.14

178
43
1,396
617
651
723
5,408
1,339
47,718
47,722
16,402

8.8
6.5
19.8
28.6
.78:1
75.1
5.8

$

$
$

1.32
1.31
2.24
1.96
1.13
5.37
18.42

176
44
1,368
639
657
410
5,359
1,502
47,649
47,701
17,330

10.0
7.5
21.0
24.9
.62:1
58.4
5.3

(2)  The financial results for 2012 and 2011 are reported in accordance with
      IFRS. 2010 data has been restated to IFRS.  All other financial information is
      presented in accordance with CGAAP and has not been restated to IFRS.

28THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 20122006

2005

2004

2003

2002

$ 769,633
175,291
944,924
81,730
14,639
96,369
22,248
3,924
26,172
6,844
9,693
53,660
81,486
38,702
30,136
212

$ 226,164
189,599
19,690
6,416
122,783
67,056
252,030

$ 689,340
160,313
849,653
70,561
14,941
85,502
21,103
3,910
25,013
6,120
11,479
42,890
75,289
30,317
24,833
10,450

$ 218,742
182,108
17,306
5,693
95,467
85,809
242,573

$ 629,822
158,871
788,693
62,629
13,977
76,606
19,977
3,928
23,905
5,761
9,675
37,265
48,925
29,105
22,323
(5,189)

$ 208,188
186,104
12,253
7,932
88,284
89,908
236,285

$ 615,661
167,059
782,720
57,663
15,163
72,826
18,413
3,988
22,401
6,299
8,396
35,730
66,780
30,639
33,273
6,176

$ 196,830
192,395
12,153
8,222
83,140
97,982
228,478

$ 565,747
184,012
749,759
59,163
13,108
72,271
18,976
3,696
22,672
6,681
8,449
34,469
59,360
25,157
20,128
475

$ 209,900
188,194
10,775
9,322
91,995
106,812
219,384

$

$
$

1.13
1.12
2.03
1.71
0.80
5.29
16.41

168
32
1,226
311
646
601
5,833
806
47,561
47,625
13,167

10.2
7.4
19.7
21.7
.43:1
47.5
5.1

$

$
$

0.90
0.89
1.79
1.58
0.63
5.11
12.50

164
27
1,157
272
613
608
5,175
732
47,694
47,463
6,956

10.1
7.1
16.6
18.0
.46:1
40.3
4.6

$

$
$

0.78
0.77
1.60
1.02
0.60
4.95
10.22

159
25
1,093
255
573
624
4,830
692
47,754
47,700
7,393

9.7
6.7
14.8
16.2
.51:1
59.5
4.2

$

$
$

0.75
0.74
1.52
1.40
0.63
4.78
7.88

156
25
1,106
254
566
669
4,552
736
47,820
47,799
7,207

9.3
6.4
14.1
16.0
.56:1
46.0
4.1

$

$
$

0.72
0.71
1.50
1.24
0.52
4.59
6.90

154
25
1,070
245
534
752
4,270
657
48,021
47,844
7,617

9.6
6.6
13.4
15.8
.62:1
42.4
3.7

Fiscal Year(1)
($ in thousands )
Consolidated Statements of Earnings

Sales  - Canadian Operations
Sales  - International Operations
Sales  - Total
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - Canadian Operations
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - International Operations
Trading profit (EBITDA)(3) - Total Operations
Amortization - Canadian Operations
Amortization - International Operations
Amortization - Total
Interest
Income tax provision
Net earnings
Cash flow from operating activities
Dividends/distributions paid during the year
Capital expenditures
Net change in cash
Consolidated Balance Sheets

Current assets
Property and equipment
Other assets, intangible assets and goodwill
Deferred tax assets
Current liabilities
Long-term debt and other liabilities
Equity
Consolidated Dollar Per Share/Unit ($)(5)

Net earnings - basic
Net earnings - diluted
Trading  profit(3),(4)
Cash flow from operating activities(4)
Dividends/distributions paid during the year(4)
Equity at end of fiscal year (basic shares/units outstanding)
Market price at January 31
Statistics at Year End

Number of stores - Canadian
Number of stores - International
Selling square feet (000's) end of year - Canadian Stores
Selling square feet (000's) end of year - International Stores
Sales per average selling square foot - Canadian
Sales per average selling square foot - International
Number of employees - Canadian Operations
Number of employees - International Operations
Average shares/units outstanding (000's)
Shares/Units outstanding at end of fiscal year (000's)
Shares/Units traded during the year (000's)
Financial Ratios
Trading profit(3) (%)
Earnings from operations (3) (EBIT) (%)
Total return on net assets(3) (%)
Return on average equity(3) (%)
Debt-to-equity
Dividends/distributions as % of cash flow from operating activities
Inventory turnover (times)

(3)  See Non-GAAP financial measures on page 26.

(4)  Based on average basic shares/units outstanding.

(5)  Effective January 1, 2011, North West Company Fund converted to a share corporation called 
       The North West Company Inc.  The comparative information refers to units of the Fund.  On 
       September 20, 2006 the units were split on a three-for-one basis.  All per unit information has
       been restated to reflect the three-for-one split except trading volume.

29ANNUAL REPORTManagement’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

Independent Auditor’s Report        

The management of The North West Company Inc. is responsible 
for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the accompanying 
consolidated  financial  statements  and  all  other  information  in  the 
annual  report.    The  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been 
prepared by management in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting  Standards  as  issued  by  the  International  Accounting 
Standards Board and include certain amounts that are based on the 
best estimates and judgment by management.

In order to meet its responsibility and ensure integrity of financial 
information, management has established a code of business ethics, 
and maintains appropriate internal controls and accounting systems.  
An internal audit function is maintained that is designed to provide 
reasonable  assurance  that  assets  are  safeguarded,  transactions  are 
authorized and recorded and that the financial records are reliable.

Ultimate responsibility for financial reporting to shareholders rests 
with  the  Board  of  Directors.   The  Audit  Committee  of  the  Board  of 
Directors, consisting of independent Directors, meets periodically with 
management and with the internal and external auditors to review the 
audit results, internal controls and accounting policies.  Internal and 
external auditors have unlimited access to the Audit Committee.  The 
Audit Committee meets separately with management and the external 
auditors to review the financial statements and other contents of the 
annual report and recommend approval by the Board of Directors.  The 
Audit  Committee  also  recommends  the  independent  auditor  for 
appointment by the shareholders.

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP, an  independent  firm  of  auditors 
appointed  by  the  shareholders,  have  completed  their  audit  and 
submitted their report as follows.

Edward S. Kennedy
PRESIDENT & CEO
THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC.

John D. King
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC.

April 8, 2013 

To the Shareholders of The North West Company Inc.:

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial 
statements of The North West Company Inc. and its subsidiaries, which 
comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at January 31, 2013 and 
January 31,  2012  and  the  consolidated  statements  of  earnings, 
comprehensive  income,  changes  in  shareholders’ equity  and  cash 
flows for the years ended January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012, and 
the related notes, which comprise a summary of significant accounting 
policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s  responsibility  for  the  consolidated  financial 
statements

Management 

is  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  fair 
presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance 
with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal 
control  as  management  determines  is  necessary  to  enable  the 
preparation  of  consolidated  financial  statements  that  are  free  from 
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated 
financial statements based on our audits in accordance with Canadian 
generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that 
we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit 
to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  consolidated 
financial statements are free from material misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence 
about  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  consolidated  financial 
statements.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor’s 
judgment, 
including  the  assessment  of  the  risks  of  material 
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due 
to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers 
internal  control  relevant  to  the  entity’s  preparation  and 
fair 
presentation  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements  in  order  to 
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but 
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of 
the  entity’s  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes  evaluating  the 
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness 
of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating 
the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits 

is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In  our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial  statements  present 
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The North West 
Company Inc. and its subsidiaries as at January 31, 2013 and January 
31, 2012 and their financial performance and their cash flows for the 
years ended January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012 in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards.

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
WINNIPEG, CANADA

April 8, 2013

30THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012      
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets

($ in thousands)

CURRENT ASSETS
     Cash

     Accounts receivable (Note 5)

     Inventories (Note 6)

     Prepaid expenses

NON-CURRENT ASSETS
     Property and equipment (Note 7)

     Goodwill (Note 8)

     Intangible assets (Note 8)

     Deferred tax assets (Note 9)

     Other assets (Note 10)

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$

38,675

70,040

187,200

7,981

303,896

274,027

26,162

20,136

12,904

14,269

347,498

$

26,984

76,539

186,124

6,189

295,836

270,370

26,319

14,620

7,422

12,350

331,081

TOTAL  ASSETS

$

651,394

$ 626,917

CURRENT LIABILITIES
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     Current portion of long-term debt (Note 11)

     Income tax payable

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
     Long-term debt (Note 11)

     Defined benefit plan obligation (Note 12)

     Deferred tax liabilities (Note 9)

     Other long-term liabilities

TOTAL  LIABILITIES

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
     Share capital (Note 15)
     Contributed surplus

     Retained earnings

     Accumulated other comprehensive income

TOTAL  EQUITY

TOTAL  LIABILITIES & EQUITY

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors

“Gary J. Lukassen”  

DIRECTOR  

“H. Sanford Riley”

DIRECTOR

$

130,501

$ 122,349

40,417

19,266

190,184

122,937

28,431

2,026

11,566

164,960

355,144

165,358
3,485

128,224

(817)

296,250

629

5,024

128,002

175,263

27,616

2,440

9,887

215,206

343,208

165,133
3,180

115,991

(595)

283,709

$

651,394

$ 626,917

31CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSConsolidated Statements of Earnings

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

SALES

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Selling, operating and administrative expenses (Notes 16, 17)

Earnings from operations

Interest expense (Note 18)

Earnings before income taxes

Income taxes (Note 9)

NET EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR

NET EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 20)
Basic

Diluted

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING (000's)

Basic

Diluted

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Year Ended

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$ 1,513,646

$ 1,495,136

(1,068,940)

(1,067,153)

444,706

(347,588)

97,118

(5,809)

91,309

(26,161)

427,983

(338,674)

89,309

(6,026)

83,283

(25,322)

$

65,148

$

57,961

$

$

1.35

1.34

$

$

1.20

1.19

48,384

48,579

48,378

48,525

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

($ in thousands)

NET EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR

Other comprehensive income/(expense):

Exchange differences on translation of foreign controlled subsidiaries, net of tax

Actuarial losses on defined benefit plans, net of tax (Note 12)

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Year Ended

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$

65,148

$

57,961

(222)

(2,595)

(2,817)

293

(15,266)

(14,973)

$

62,331

$

42,988

32THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

($ in thousands)

Balance at January 31, 2012

Net earnings for the year

Other comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

Equity settled share-based payments

Dividends (Note 19)

Issuance of common shares

Share
Capital

Contributed
Surplus

Retained 
Earnings

AOCI (1)

Total

$ 165,133

$

3,180

$ 115,991

$

(595)

$ 283,709

—

—

—

—

—

225

225

—

—

—

471

—

(166)

305

65,148

(2,595)

62,553

—

(50,320)

—

(50,320)

—

(222)

(222)

—

—

—

—

65,148

(2,817)

62,331

471

(50,320)

59

(49,790)

Balance at January 31, 2013

$165,358

$

3,485

$128,224

$

(817)

$296,250

Balance at January 31, 2011

Net earnings for the year

Other comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

Equity settled share-based payments

Dividends (Note 19)

$ 165,133

$

2,491

$ 119,739

$

(888)

$ 286,475

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

689

—

689

57,961

(15,266)

42,695

—

(46,443)

(46,443)

—

293

293

—

—

—

57,961

(14,973)

42,988

689

(46,443)

(45,754)

Balance at January 31, 2012

$ 165,133

$

3,180

$ 115,991

$

(595)

$ 283,709

 (1) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

33CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows

($ in thousands)

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)

Operating activities

Net earnings for the year

Adjustments for:

Amortization

Provision for income taxes (Note 9)

Interest expense (Note 18)

Equity settled share option expense (Note 13)

Taxes paid

(Gain)/Loss on disposal of property and equipment

Change in non-cash working capital

Change in other non-cash items

Cash from operating activities

Investing activities

Purchase of property and equipment (Note 7)

Intangible asset additions (Note 8)

Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment

Cash from investing activities

Financing activities

Decrease in long-term debt (Note 11)

Repayments of long-term debt

Dividends / distributions (Note 19)

Interest paid

Issuance of common shares

Cash from financing activities

NET CHANGE IN CASH

Cash, beginning of year

CASH, END OF YEAR

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

Year Ended

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$

65,148

$

57,961

37,149

26,161

5,809

471

(15,483)

1,978

121,233

10,764

(3,005)

128,992

(42,236)

(8,897)

2,352

(48,781)

(12,285)

—

(50,320)

(5,974)

59

(68,520)

11,691

26,984

36,572

25,322

6,026

689

(6,195)

438

120,813

(2,989)

(2,355)

115,469

(45,565)

(811)

428

(45,948)

(13,360)

(3,676)

(50,797)

(5,935)

—

(73,768)

(4,247)

31,231

$

38,675

$

26,984

34THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012Notes to 
Consolidated 
Financial 
Statements

($ IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
JANUARY 31, 2013 AND 2012

1.  ORGANIZATION

The North West Company Inc. (NWC or the Company) is a corporation 
amalgamated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) and 
governed  by  the  laws  of  Canada.    The  Company,  through  its 
subsidiaries, is a leading retailer of food and everyday  products and 
services.  The address of its registered office is 77 Main Street, Winnipeg, 
Manitoba.

These consolidated financial statements have been approved for 

issue by the Board of Directors of the Company on April 8, 2013.

2.  BASIS OF PREPARATION

(A)  Statement  of  Compliance  

  These  consolidated  financial 
statements have been prepared in accordance with International 
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International 
Accounting Standards Board (IASB).  

(B)  Basis of Measurement  The consolidated financial statements 
have been prepared on a going concern basis, under the historical 
cost convention, except for the following which are measured at 
fair value:

• 
• 
• 
• 

Derivative financial instruments 
Financial instruments designated at fair value 
Liabilities for share-based payment plans 
Defined benefit pension plan

The methods used to measure fair values are discussed further in 
the notes to these financial statements.

(C)  Functional  and  Presentation  Currency    The  presentation 
currency  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements  is  Canadian 
dollars, which is the Company’s functional currency.  All financial 
information  is  presented  in  Canadian  dollars,  unless  otherwise 
stated, and has been rounded to the nearest thousand.

3.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting policies set out below have been applied to all years 
presented in these consolidated financial statements, and have been 
applied consistently by both the Company and its subsidiaries using 
uniform accounting policies for like transactions and other events in 
similar circumstances.

(A)  Basis of Consolidation  Subsidiaries are entities controlled, either 
directly or indirectly, by the Company.  Control exists when the 
Company has the power to govern the financial and operating 

policies of an entity so as to obtain benefit from its activities and 
is  generally  accompanying  a  shareholding  of  more  than  50%.  
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control 
is transferred to the Company until the date that control ceases.  
Joint ventures are those entities over which the Company 
has  joint  control,  established  by  contractual  agreement.    The 
Company’s share of its joint ventures has been classified as a jointly 
controlled  entity.    Its  results  are  included  in  the  consolidated 
statements of earnings using the equity method of accounting.  
Joint ventures are carried in the consolidated balance sheets at 
cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Company’s share of net 
assets of the entity, less any impairment in value.

All significant inter-company amounts and transactions have 

been eliminated. 

(B)  Business Combinations  Business combinations are accounted 
for  using  the  acquisition  method  of  accounting. 
  The 
consideration transferred is measured at the fair value of the assets 
given, equity  instruments  issued  and  liabilities  assumed  at  the 
date of exchange.   Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and 
included in selling, operating and administrative expenses.  Any 
contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be 
recognized  at  fair  value  at  the  acquisition  date.    Subsequent 
changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which 
is  deemed  to  be  an  asset  or  liability  will  be  recognized  in 
accordance  with  International  Accounting  Standard  (IAS)  39 
either  in  net  earnings  or  as  a  change  to  other  comprehensive 
income  (OCI).    If  the  contingent  consideration  is  classified  as 
equity, it will not be remeasured until it is finally settled within 
equity.

Identifiable  assets  acquired,  and  liabilities  and  contingent 
liabilities  assumed  in  a  business  combination,  are  measured 
initially at their fair values at the acquisition date irrespective of 
the extent of any non-controlling interest.  The excess of the cost 
of the acquisition over the fair value of the Company’s share of 
the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.  If the 
cost of acquisition is less than the fair value of the net assets of 
the subsidiary  acquired, the difference is recognized directly in 
the consolidated statement of earnings.

(C)  Revenue Recognition   Revenue on the sale of goods is recorded 
at the  time  the  sale is made  to the  customer, being  when  the 
significant risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the 
customer,  recovery  of  the  consideration  is  probable,  and  the 
amount of revenue can be measured reliably.  Sales are presented 
net of tax, returns and discounts and are measured at the fair value 
of the consideration received or receivable from the customer for 
the  products  sold  or  services  supplied.    Service  charges  on 
customer  account  receivables  are  accrued  each  month  on 
balances outstanding at each account’s billing date.

(D)  Inventories   Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net 
realizable value.  The cost of warehouse inventories is determined 
using  the  weighted-average  cost  method.    The  cost  of  retail 
inventories  is  determined  primarily  using  the  retail  method  of 
accounting  for  general  merchandise  inventories  and  the  cost 
method of accounting for food inventories on a first-in, first-out 
basis.  Cost includes the cost to purchase goods net of vendor 
allowances plus other costs incurred in bringing inventories to 
their  present  location  and  condition.    Net  realizable  value  is 
estimated  based  on  the  amount  at  which  inventories  are 
expected to be sold, taking into consideration fluctuations in retail 
prices due to seasonality.

Inventories are written down to net realizable value if net 
  When 

realizable  value  declines  below  carrying  amount. 

35NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
circumstances that previously caused inventories to be written 
down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence 
of  an  increase  in  selling  price,  the  amount  of  the  write-down 
previously recorded is reversed.  

(E)  Vendor Rebates   Consideration received from vendors related 
to the purchase of merchandise is recorded on an accrual basis 
as a reduction in the cost of the vendor’s products and reflected 
as a reduction of cost of sales and related inventory. 

(F)  Property and Equipment   Property and equipment are stated 
at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses.  
Cost includes any directly attributable costs, borrowing costs on 
qualifying construction projects, and the costs of dismantling and 
removing  the  items  and  restoring  the  site  on  which  they  are 
located.  When major components of  an item of property  and 
equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as 
separate items.  Amortization is calculated from the dates assets 
are available for use using the straight-line method to allocate the 
cost of assets less their residual values over their estimated useful 
lives as follows:

Buildings                                        3% –   8% 
Leasehold improvements          5% –  20% 
Fixtures and equipment             8% –  33% 
Computer equipment              12% –  33% 

Amortization  methods,  useful  lives  and  residual  values  are 
reviewed  at  each  reporting  date  and  adjusted  if  appropriate.  
Assets under construction and land are not amortized.  

(G)  Impairment 

Impairment of non-financial assets  Tangible assets and definite life 
intangible  assets  are  reviewed  at  each  balance  sheet  date  to 
determine  whether  events  or  conditions  indicate  that  their 
carrying amount may not be recoverable.  If any such indication 
exists, the recoverable amount of the asset, which is the higher of 
its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use, is estimated in 
order to determine the extent of the impairment loss.  Where the 
asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from 
other assets, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of 
the cash-generating unit (CGU) to which the asset belongs.  For 
tangible and intangible assets excluding goodwill, the CGU is the 
smallest  group  of  assets  that  generates  cash  inflows  from 
continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows 
of other assets or groups of assets.  

Goodwill  and  indefinite  life  intangible  assets  are  not 
amortized  but  are  subject  to  an  impairment  test  annually  and 
whenever  indicators  of  impairment  are  detected.    Goodwill  is 
allocated to CGU’s that are expected to benefit from the synergies 
of the related business combination and represents the lowest 
level  within  the  Company  at  which  goodwill  is  monitored  for 
internal  management  purposes,  which 
is  the  Company’s 
International operating segment before aggregation.

Any impairment  charge is recognized in the consolidated 
statement  of  earnings  in  the  period  in  which  it  occurs,  to  the 
extent that the carrying  value exceeds its recoverable amount.  
Where  an  impairment  loss  other  than  an  impairment  loss  on 
goodwill subsequently reverses due to a change in the original 
estimate,  the  carrying  amount  of  the  asset  is  increased  to  the 
revised estimate of its recoverable amount.  Impairment charges 
on goodwill are not reversed.

Impairment of financial assets  Financial assets are assessed at each 
reporting  date  to  determine  whether  there  is  any  objective 

evidence that they are impaired.  A financial asset is considered 
to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more 
events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash 
flows  of  that  asset.    An  impairment  loss  is  calculated  as  the 
difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of 
the  estimated  future  cash  flows  discounted  at  their  original 
effective interest rate.

All  impairment  losses  are  recognized  in  the  consolidated 
statement of earnings.  An impairment loss, except an impairment 
loss related to goodwill,  is reversed if the reversal can be related 
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was 
recognized. 

(H)  Leases    Leases  in  which  a  significant  portion  of  the  risks  and 
rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are accounted for 
as operating leases.  Assets leased under operating leases are not 
recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.  Rental payments 
are recorded in selling, operating and administrative expenses in 
the  consolidated  statements  of  earnings.    Lease  incentives 
received are recognized as part of the total lease expense, over 
the term of the lease.

Leases in which the Company has substantially all of the risks 
and rewards of ownership are accounted for as finance leases.  At 
commencement, finance leases are capitalized at the lower of the 
fair value of the leased property and the present value of minimum 
lease payments, and are recorded in property and equipment on 
the  consolidated  balance  sheets.    Finance  lease  liabilities  are 
recorded in long-term debt and are reduced by the amount of 
the lease payment net of imputed interest (finance charges).

(I)  Borrowing Costs   Borrowing costs directly attributable  to the 
acquisition or construction of qualifying assets are capitalized as 
part  of  the  cost  of  the  respective  asset  until  it  is  ready  for  its 
intended use.  Qualifying assets are those assets that necessarily 
take a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended use.  
Borrowing  costs  are  capitalized  based  on  the  Company’s 
weighted-average cost of borrowing.  All other borrowing costs 
are expensed as incurred.  

(J)  Goodwill  Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration 
transferred over the fair value of the identifiable assets, including 
intangible  assets,  and  liabilities  of  the  acquiree  at  the  date  of 
acquisition.    Goodwill  is  not  amortized  but  is  subject  to  an 
impairment test annually and whenever indicators of impairment 
are  detected.    Goodwill  is  carried  at  cost  less  accumulated 
impairment losses.

(K) 

Intangible Assets   Intangible assets with finite lives are carried 
at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment loss.  
Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of 
the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:

Software 
Non-compete agreements 

3 to 7 years
3 to 5 years

Intangible assets with indefinite lives comprise the Cost-U-Less 
banner.    This  asset  is  not  amortized  but  instead  is  tested  for 
impairment  annually  or  more  frequently 
indicators  of 
impairment are identified.

if 

36THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
 
 
(L)  Share-based Payment Transactions 

Equity settled plans   The Share Option Plan prior to June 14, 2011  
is an equity settled share-based payment plan.  The fair value of 
this  plan was determined using an option pricing model.  The 
grant date fair values of this benefit is recognized as an employee 
expense over the vesting period, with corresponding increases in 
equity.

Cash settled plans   The Share Option Plan commencing June 14, 
2011, Restricted Share Units, Performance Share Units, Employee 
Share Purchase Plan and Director Deferred Share Unit Plan are cash 
settled share-based payments.  These plans are measured at fair 
value  at  each  balance  sheet  date  and  a  charge  or  recovery 
recognized through the consolidated statement of earnings over 
the vesting period.  A corresponding adjustment is reflected in 
accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities  or  other  long-term 
liabilities.

The  value  of  the  charges  under  both  cash  settled  and  equity 
settled  plans  are  adjusted  in  the  consolidated  statement  of 
earnings to reflect expected and actual levels of benefits vesting.

(M)  Foreign  Currency  Translation   The  accounts  of 

foreign 
operations have been translated into the presentation currency, 
Canadian dollars.  Assets and liabilities are translated at the period-
end exchange rate, and revenues and expenses at the average 
rate for the period.  Foreign exchange gains or losses arising from 
the translation of the net investment in foreign operations and 
the portion of the U.S. denominated borrowings designated as a 
hedge  against  this  investment are  recorded in  equity  as  other 
comprehensive  income.    Foreign  exchange  gains  or  losses 
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) are 
recognized in net earnings when there is a reduction in the net 
investment in foreign operations.

Items included in the financial statements of the Company 
and  its  subsidiaries  are  measured  using  the  currency  of  the 
primary  economic  environment  in  which  the  entity  operates 
(functional  currency).    Transactions  in  foreign  currencies  are 
translated  to  the  respective  functional  currencies  at  exchange 
rates approximating the rates in effect at the transaction dates.  
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies 
at the reporting date are retranslated to the functional currency 
at the exchange rate ruling at that date.

(N)  Income Taxes   Income tax expense includes taxes payable on 
current earnings and changes in deferred tax balances.  Current 
income  tax  expense  is  the  expected  tax  payable  on  taxable 
income for the period, using tax rates enacted or substantively 
enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable 
in respect of previous periods.  

The Company accounts for deferred income taxes using the 
liability  method  of  tax  allocation.    Under  the  liability  method, 
deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based 
on  the  temporary  differences between  the  financial  statement 
carrying  values  and  tax  bases  of  assets  and  liabilities,  and  are 
measured using substantively enacted tax rates and laws that are 
expected  to  be  in  effect  in  the  periods  in  which  the  deferred 
income  tax  assets  or  liabilities  are  expected  to  be  realized  or 
settled.    The  measurement  of  deferred  tax  reflects  the  tax 
consequences  that  would  follow  the  manner  in  which  the 
Company expects to settle the carrying amount of its assets and 
liabilities.  A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it 
is probable that future taxable earnings will be available against 
which  the  temporary  difference  can  be  utilized.    Deferred  tax 
assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the 

extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will 
be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they 
relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and 
there is a legally enforceable right to offset the amounts.

Income  tax  expense  is  recognized  in  the  consolidated 
statement of earnings, except to the extent that it relates to items 
recognized directly in other comprehensive income or in equity, 
in which case the related income tax expense is also recognized 
in other comprehensive income or in equity respectively.  

(O)  Employee Benefits   The Company maintains either a defined 
benefit or defined contribution pension plans for the majority of 
its Canadian employees, and an employee savings plan for its U.S. 
employees.  Other benefits include employee bonuses, employee 
share purchase plans and termination benefits.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan  The actuarial  determination of the 
defined  benefit  obligations  for  pension  benefits  uses  the 
projected  unit  credit  method  prorated  on  services  which 
incorporates management’s best estimate of the discount rate, 
expected  plan 
investment  performance,  salary  escalation, 
retirement  rates,  termination  rates  and  retirement  ages  of 
employees.  The discount rate used to value the defined benefit 
obligation is derived from a portfolio of high quality Corporate AA 
bonds denominated in the same currency in which the benefits 
are  expected  to  be  paid  and  with  terms  to  maturity  that,  on 
average, match the terms of the defined benefit plan obligations.  
Bonds included in the curve are denominated in the currency in 
which  the  benefits  will  be  paid  that  have  terms  to  maturity 
approximating the terms of the related pension liability.  When 
calculating expected returns on plan assets, assets are valued at 
fair market value.  

The amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet 
at each reporting date represents the present value of the defined 
benefit obligation, adjusted for unvested past service costs and 
reduced by the fair value of plan assets.  Any recognized asset or 
surplus  is  limited  to  the  present  value  of  economic  benefits 
available  in  the  form  of  any  future  refunds  from  the  plan  or 
reductions  in  future  contributions.   To the  extent  that  there  is 
uncertainty  regarding  entitlement  to  the  surplus,  no  asset  is 
recorded.  The Company’s funding policy is in compliance with 
statutory  regulations  and  amounts  funded  are  deductible  for 
income tax purposes.

The actuarially determined expense is recognized annually 
in the consolidated statement of earnings.  All actuarial gains and 
losses arising from defined benefit plans are recognized in full in 
the period in which they arise in the consolidated statement of 
other comprehensive income, and the recognized actuarial gains 
and losses are presented in retained earnings.  The effect of the 
asset ceiling is also recognized in other comprehensive income.  
Interest costs on the defined benefit obligation and the expected 
return  on  employee  benefit  plan  assets  are  charged  to  the 
consolidated statement of earnings as interest expense.

Defined  Contribution  Pension  Plans    The  Company  sponsors 
defined contribution pension plans for eligible employees where 
fixed  contributions  are  paid  into  a  registered plan. There  is  no 
obligation for the Company to pay any additional amount into 
these plans.  Contributions to the defined contribution pension 
plans are expensed as incurred.  

Short-term Benefits  An undiscounted liability is recognized for the 
amount expected to be paid under short-term incentive plans or 
employee share purchase plans if the Company has a present legal 
or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past 

37NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
 
 
service  provided  by  the  employee  and  the  obligation  can  be 
estimated reliably.

Termination Benefits  Termination benefits are recognized as  an 
expense  when  the  Company  is  demonstrably  committed, 
without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan 
to  either  terminate  employment  before the  normal  retirement 
date, or to provide termination benefits as a result of an offer made 
to encourage voluntary  redundancy.  If the effect is significant, 
benefits are discounted to present value.

(P)  Provisions  A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, 
the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation that 
can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of 
economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. 

(Q)  Financial  Instruments   Financial  assets  and 

liabilities  are 
recognized  when  the  Company  becomes  a  party  to  the 
contractual provisions of the financial instrument.  Financial assets 
are  derecognized  when  the  contractual  rights  to  receive  cash 
flows and benefits related from the financial asset expire, or the 
Company transfers the control or substantially all the risks  and 
rewards  of  ownership  of  the  financial  asset  to  another  party.  
Financial liabilities are derecognized when obligations under the 
contract  expire,  are  discharged  or  cancelled. 
initial 
recognition, all financial instruments are classified into one of the 
following categories: fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), loans 
and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale, 
or other financial liabilities.  

  On 

Financial instruments have been classified as follows:

• 
• 

• 

Cash is designated as loans and receivables
Accounts receivable and financial assets included   in other 
assets are classified as loans and receivables
Long-term  debt,  accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities, 
and certain  other liabilities are classified as other financial 
liabilities

Financial  instruments  are  initially  recognized  at  fair  value  plus 
transaction costs; subsequent measurement and recognition of 
changes in value depends on their initial classification.  Financial 
instruments classified as FVTPL are subsequently measured at fair 
value, with changes in fair value recorded in net earnings.  Loans 
and receivables are subsequently carried at amortized cost less 
impairment  losses.    Interest  revenue,  consisting  primarily  of 
service  charge  income  on  customer  accounts  receivable,  is 
included in sales in the consolidated statement of earnings.  Other 
financial  liabilities  are  subsequently  held  at  amortized  cost.  
Interest expense relating to long-term debt is recorded using the 
effective interest rate method and included in the consolidated 
statement of earnings in interest expense.

The Company is exposed to financial risks associated with 
movements in interest rates and exchange rates.  The Company 
instruments  to  hedge  these 
may  use  derivative  financial 
exposures.  Qualifying hedge relationships are classified as either 
fair  value  hedges,  cash  flow  hedges  or  as  a  hedge  of  a  net 
investment  in  foreign operations.    Fair value  hedges  are  those 
where the derivative financial instrument hedges a change in the 
fair value of the financial asset or liability due to movements in 
interest rates.  The Company does not have any cash flow hedges.  
Net investment hedges use financial liabilities to counterbalance 
gains and losses arising on the retranslation of foreign operations.
To qualify for hedge accounting, the Company documents 
its  risk  management  strategy,  the  relationship  between  the 

hedging instrument and the hedged item or transaction and the 
nature of the risks being hedged.  The Company also documents 
the assessment of the effectiveness of the hedging relationship, 
to show that the hedge has been and will likely be highly effective 
on an ongoing basis.

To  the  extent  that  a  fair  value  hedging  relationship  is 
effective, a gain or loss arising from the hedged item adjusts its 
carrying value and is reflected in earnings, offset by a change in 
fair value of the underlying derivative.  Any changes in fair value 
of  derivatives  that  do  not  qualify  for  hedge  accounting  are 
reported in earnings.  Changes in fair value relating to the interest 
rate swaps are included in interest expense.  

The  Company  has  designated  a  portion  of  the  U.S. 
denominated  debt  as  a  hedge  of  its  net  investment  in  U.S. 
operations.  To the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, 
the foreign exchange gains and losses arising from translation of 
this  debt  are  included  in  other  comprehensive  income. These 
gains and losses are subsequently recognized in earnings when 
the hedged item affects earnings.

loss  on  the  hedging 

Hedge  accounting  is  discontinued  when  the  hedging 
instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or no longer 
qualifies for hedge accounting.  At that time, any cumulative gain 
in  other 
or 
comprehensive income is retained in equity until the forecasted 
transaction occurs.  If a hedged transaction is no longer expected 
to  occur,  the  net  cumulative  gain  or  loss  recognized  in  other 
comprehensive income is transferred to the income statement 
for the period.

instrument  recognized 

Embedded  derivatives  are  components  of  hybrid 
instruments that include non-derivative host contracts.  These are 
separated  from  their  host  contracts  and  recorded  on  the 
consolidated balance sheets at fair value when certain conditions 
are met.  Changes in the fair value of embedded derivatives are 
recognized in earnings.

(R)  Cash  Cash comprises cash on hand and balances with banks.  

(S)  Net  Earnings  Per  Share    Basic  net  earnings  per  share  are 
calculated by dividing the net earnings by the weighted-average 
number  of  common  shares  outstanding  during  the  period.  
Diluted  net  earnings  per  share  is  determined  by  adjusting  net 
earnings and the weighted-average number of common shares 
outstanding for the effects of all potentially dilutive shares, which 
comprise shares issued under the Share Option Plan and Deferred 
Share Unit Plan.

(T)  Use  of  Estimates   The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in 
conformity  with IFRS requires management to make  estimates 
and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  and 
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and notes.

These  estimates  and  assumptions  are  based  on 
management’s historical experience, best knowledge of current 
events, conditions and actions that the Company may undertake 
in  the  future  and  other  factors  that  management  believes  are 
reasonable under the circumstances.  Estimates and underlying 
assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.  Certain of these 
estimates 
judgments  by 
management about matters that are uncertain and changes in 
these  estimates  could  materially 
impact  the  consolidated 
financial statements and notes.  Revisions to accounting estimates 
are recognized in the period in which the estimates are reviewed 
and in any future periods affected.

require  subjective  or  complex 

38THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
 
 
Areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, 
or  areas  where  assumptions  and  estimates  have  the  most 
significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated 
financial statements include:

• 
• 
• 
• 

• 
• 

Allowance for doubtful accounts (Notes 5, 14)
Inventories (Note 6)
Impairment of assets (Note 7)
Goodwill  and  indefinite  life  intangible  asset  impairment 
(Note 8)
Income taxes (Note 9)
Defined benefit pension plan obligations (Note 12)

(U)  Share  capital 

  Common  shares  are  classified  as  equity.  
Incremental  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  issue  of  ordinary 
shares are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax 
effects.

(V)  New  Standards  Implemented    The  Company  adopted  the 
amendments to IFRS listed below effective February 1, 2012, as 
required by the IASB.  These amendments had no material impact 
on the Company's results from operations or financial condition.

Financial Instruments: Disclosures  The IASB issued amendments to 
IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures to expand the disclosure 
requirements for transfers of financial assets.  The amendments 
help financial statement users evaluate financial risks that may be 
associated  with  these  transfers. 
  The  Company's  capital 
management  activities  do  not  involve  the  transfer  of  financial 
assets.

Income Taxes  The IASB issued an amendment to IAS 12, Income 
Taxes  introducing  an  exception  to  the  general  measurement 
requirements of IAS 12 for investment properties measured at fair 
value.   The  Company  does  not  have  any  investment  property 
measured at fair value.

(W)  Future  Standards  and  Amendments    A  number  of  new 
standards, and amendments to standards and interpretations, are 
not yet effective for the year ended January 31, 2013, and have 
not  been  applied  in  preparing  these  consolidated  financial 
statements.    Unless  otherwise  noted,  the  following  revised 
standards  and  amendments  are  effective  for  the  Company’s 
annual periods beginning February 1, 2013.  

Consolidated  Financial  Statements    The  IASB  issued  IFRS  10, 
Consolidated  Financial Statements  replacing  portions  of  IAS  27, 
Consolidated  and  Separate  Financial  Statements  addressing 
consolidation  and 
Interpretations 
Committee  (SIC)  Interpretation    12  in  its  entirety.    IFRS  10 
establishes  principles  for  the  presentation  and  preparation  of 
consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or 
more  other  entities.   This  standard  is  not  expected  to  have  a 
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

superseding  Standing 

Joint Arrangements  The IASB issued IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements 
superseding  IAS  31,  Interest in Joint  Ventures  and  SIC-13,  Jointly 
Controlled Entities – Non Monetary Contributions by Venturers.  IFRS 
11  establishes  principles  for  determining  the  type  of  joint 
arrangement by assessing the venturers’ rights and obligations.  
This standard provides guidance for financial reporting activities 
required by entities that have an interest in a jointly controlled 
arrangement.    Joint  ventures  will  be  accounted  for  using  the 
equity method of accounting, whereas for a joint operation the 
venturer will recognize its share of the venture's assets, liabilities, 

revenues and expenses.  The adoption of IFRS 11 is not expected 
to  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  consolidated  financial 
statements.

Interests 

Disclosure  of  Interests  in  Other  Entities   The  IASB  issued  IFRS  12, 
Disclosure  of 
in  Other  Entities  requiring  extensive 
disclosures  relating  to  a  company’s  interest  in  subsidiaries, 
associates  and  certain  other  arrangements.    IFRS  12  enables 
financial  statement  users  to  evaluate  the  nature  and  risks 
associated with these interests, and evaluate their effect  on the 
Company’s financial performance.  This standard is not expected 
to  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  consolidated  financial 
statements.

Employee benefits  The revised IAS 19, Employee Benefits issued by 
the IASB eliminates the option to defer the recognition of actuarial 
gains  and  losses  on  defined  benefit  plans.    It  amends  the 
calculation  of plan assets and benefit obligations, streamlines the 
presentation  of  changes  in  defined  benefit  plans  and  requires 
enhanced disclosure.  The requirement to calculate the expected 
return on plan assets with the interest rate  used to calculate the 
defined  benefit  plan  obligation    is  the  most  significant  for the 
Company.  The Company will adopt this standard for its fiscal year 
beginning February 1, 2013.  The implementation of this standard 
in  the  Company's  2013  financial  statements  will  require 
restatement of its 2012  comparative numbers with an estimated 
decrease in net earnings of $1,260 comprised of an increase to 
interest expense of $1,170, an increase to selling, operating and 
administrative expenses of $550 and a deferred tax recovery of 
$460.

Financial Instruments  The IASB has issued a new standard which 
will eventually replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition 
and  Measurement. 
IFRS  9,  Financial 
  The  development  of 
Instruments is a multi-phase project with a goal of improving and 
simplifying financial instrument reporting.  IFRS 9 uses a single 
approach to determine measurement of a financial asset based 
on how an entity manages financial impairment, replacing the 
multiple classification options in IAS 39 with only two categories: 
amortized cost and fair value through profit or loss.  This standard 
is effective for the Company’s financial year beginning February 
1, 2015.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of changes 
to this standard.

Presentation of Financial Statements   The IASB has amended IAS 1, 
Presentation of Financial Statements to enhance the presentation 
of  Other  Comprehensive  Income  (OCI).    These  amendments 
require the  components  of  OCI  to  be  presented separately  for 
items that may be reclassified to the statement of earnings from 
those that remain in equity.  This standard is not expected to have 
a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Fair  Value  Measurement    IFRS  13,  Fair  Value  Measurement  is  a 
comprehensive  standard  for  fair  value  measurement  and 
disclosure requirements for use across all IFRS.  The new standard 
clarifies that fair value is the price that would be received to sell 
an  asset,  or  paid  to  transfer a  liability  in  an  orderly  transaction 
between market participants, at the measurement date.  It also 
establishes  disclosures  about  fair  value  measurement.    This 
standard  is  not  expected  to  have  a  significant  impact  on  the 
consolidated financial statements.

39NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
Financial Instruments  The IASB has issued amendments to IFRS 7, 
Financial Instruments: Disclosures and IAS 32, Financial Instruments: 
Presentation which clarify the requirements for offsetting financial 
liabilities  along  with  new  disclosure 
assets  and  financial 
requirements . These amendments are effective for the Company’s 
financial years beginning February 1, 2014 and February 1, 2013 
respectively.    These  standards  are  not  expected  to  have  a 
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.

4.  SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company is a retailer of food and everyday products and services 
in  two  geographical  segments,  Canada  and  International.    The 
International  segment  consists  of  wholly  owned  subsidiaries 
operating  in  the  continental  United  States,  Caribbean  and  South 
Pacific.  Financial information for these business segments is regularly 
reviewed by the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer to 
assess  performance  and  make  decisions  about  the  allocation  of 
resources.

The following key information is presented by geographic segment:  

Assets

Canada

International

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$ 444,848

$

443,956

206,546

182,961

Consolidated

$ 651,394

$

626,917

International total assets includes goodwill of $26,162 (January 31, 
2012 - $26,319).

Supplemental information

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Canada

Int'l

Canada

Int'l

Expenditure on property and 
     equipment

$ 25,128 $ 17,108 $ 33,952 $ 11,613

Amortization

$ 29,155 $ 7,994 $ 28,745 $ 7,827

Consolidated Statements of Earnings

5.  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Year Ended

Sales

Canada

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$ 1,043,050

$ 1,028,396

Current:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

International

470,596

466,740

Trade accounts receivable

$ 72,162

$ 76,349

Consolidated

$ 1,513,646

$ 1,495,136

Earnings before amortization, interest and income taxes

Canada

International

$ 107,060

$

27,207

97,998

27,883

Consolidated

$ 134,267

$

125,881

Earnings from operations

Canada

International

Consolidated

$

77,905

19,213

$

97,118

$

$

69,253

20,056

89,309

Corporate and other 

accounts receivable

Less: allowance for doubtful 

accounts

Non-current:

Long-term receivable
    (Note 10)

11,920

13,796

(14,042)

(13,606)

$ 70,040

$ 76,539

$

2,626

$

2,507

$ 72,666

$ 79,046

The carrying  values of current accounts receivable are a reasonable 
approximation of their fair values.  The maximum exposure to credit 
risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of receivable 
mentioned above (Note 14).

Movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts for customer and 
commercial accounts receivables are as follows:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Current:

Balance, beginning of year

$

(13,606)

$

(13,338)

Net charge

Written off

(7,606)

7,170

(7,748)

7,480

Balance, end of year

$

(14,042)

$

(13,606)

40THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6. 

INVENTORIES

Retail inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Valuing retail inventories requires the Company to use estimates related 
to: discount factors used to convert inventory to cost; future retail sales prices and reductions; and inventory losses during periods between the 
last physical count and the balance sheet date.  Included in inventories recognized as an expense for the year ended January 31, 2013, the Company 
recorded  $1,648 (January 31, 2012 - $1,851) for the write-down of inventories as a result of net realizable value being lower than cost.  There was 
no reversal of inventories written down previously that are no longer estimated to sell below cost during the year ended January 31, 2013 or 2012.

7.  PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT

January 31, 2013

Cost

Land

Buildings

Leasehold 
improvements

Fixtures & 
equipment

Computer 
equipment

Construction 
in process

Total

Balance, beginning of year

$

12,179

$ 301,354

$

41,831

$ 211,549

$

61,667

$

17,162

$ 645,742

Additions

Disposals

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

—

(8)

(27)

21,847

(928)

(415)

954

(4,062)

(64)

15,592

(3,146)

(268)

1,738

(48)

(46)

2,105

—

(22)

42,236

(8,192)

(842)

Total January 31, 2013

$

12,144

$ 321,858

$

38,659

$ 223,727

$

63,311

$

19,245

$ 678,944

Accumulated amortization

Balance, beginning of year

Amortization expense

Disposals

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2013

$

$

—

—

—

—

—

$ 158,017

$

20,348

$ 145,054

$

51,953

$

14,885

(693)

(158)

3,003

(1,217)

(35)

12,078

(1,925)

(183)

3,855

(28)

(37)

$ 172,051

$

22,099

$ 155,024

55,743

$

—

—

—

—

—

$ 375,372

33,821

(3,863)

(413)

$ 404,917

Net book value January 31, 2013

$ 12,144

$ 149,807

$ 16,560

$ 68,703

7,568

$ 19,245

$ 274,027

January 31, 2012

Cost

Land

Buildings

Leasehold
improvements

Fixtures &
equipment

Computer
equipment

Construction
in process

Total

Balance, beginning of year

$

12,182

$ 291,234

$

37,496

$ 203,236

$

55,302

$

Additions

Disposals

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

8

(24)

13

13,890

(4,009)

239

4,682

(388)

41

10,991

(2,853)

175

6,639

(311)

37

7,801

9,355

—

6

$ 607,251

45,565

(7,585)

511

Total January 31, 2012

$

12,179

$ 301,354

$

41,831

$ 211,549

$

61,667

$

17,162

$ 645,742

Accumulated amortization

Balance, beginning of year

Amortization expense

Disposals

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2012

$

$

—

—

—

—

—

$ 146,959

$

17,766

$ 135,225

$

47,718

$

13,795

(2,856)

119

2,911

(354)

25

12,120

(2,423)

132

4,398

(187)

24

$ 158,017

$

20,348

$ 145,054

51,953

$

—

—

—

—

—

$ 347,668

33,224

(5,820)

300

$ 375,372

Net book value January 31, 2012

$ 12,179

$ 143,337

$ 21,483

$ 66,495

9,714

$ 17,162

$ 270,370

The Company reviewed its property and equipment for indicators of impairment.  No assets were identified as impaired.

$

$

$

$

41NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest capitalized  
Interest attributable to the construction of qualifying assets was capitalized using an average rate of 3.49% and 3.21% for the years ended January 31, 
2013 and 2012 respectively.  Interest capitalized included in additions amounted to $506 (January 31, 2012 - $161).  Accumulated interest capitalized 
included in the cost total above amounted to $697 (January 31, 2012 - $191).

8.  GOODWILL & INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Balance at beginning of year

$

26,319

$

26,241

Effect of movements in foreign 
     exchange

(157)

78

Balance at end of year

$

26,162

$

26,319

Goodwill Impairment Testing  
The  goodwill  asset  balance  relates  to  the  Company's  acquired 
subsidiary, Cost-U-Less, and is allocated to the International Operations 
operating segment.  The value of the goodwill was tested by means of 
comparing the recoverable amount of the operating segment to its 
carrying value.  To calculate the operating segment's recoverable 

amount,  the  Company  uses  the  capitalized  earnings  method.  The 
product of maintainable earnings and a capitalization rate are used to 
determine the recoverable amount.  The capitalization rate is based on 
the  International  Operations  weighted-average cost  of  capital.    Key 
assumptions  in  the  capitalization  rate  include:  equity  risk  premium, 
debt-to-equity ratio, pre-tax cost of debt capital and company specific 
risk premium.  Cash flow forecasts for the following financial year are 
used to calculate maintainable earnings, to which a terminal growth 
rate of 2% has been applied.  The capitalization rate implies a post-tax 
discount rate of 10.9% (January 31, 2012 - 11.1%), which equates to a 
pre-tax  rate  of  approximately 14.5%  (January 31,  2012  -  14.9%).    No 
impairment  has  been  identified  on  goodwill,  and  management 
considers  reasonably  foreseeable  changes  in  key  assumptions  are 
unlikely to produce a goodwill impairment.  

Intangible assets

January 31, 2013

Balance, beginning of year

Additions

Write off of fully amortized assets

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2013

Accumulated amortization at beginning of year

Amortization expense

Write off of fully amortized assets

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2013

Net book value January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Balance, beginning of year

Additions

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2012

Accumulated amortization, beginning of year

Amortization expense

Effect of movements in foreign exchange

Total January 31, 2012

Net book value January 31, 2012

Software

Cost-U-Less banner

Non-compete 
agreements

Total

$

15,868

$

7,027

$

8,123

$

31,018

8,684

—

—

24,552

11,996

1,930

—

—

$

$

$

13,926

$ 10,626

—

—

(42)

6,985

—

—

—

—

—

6,985

$

$

$

$

213

(1,867)

(19)

6,450

4,402

1,398

(1,867)

(8)

3,925

2,525

$

$

$

$

8,897

(1,867)

(61)

37,987

16,398

3,328

(1,867)

(8)

$

$

$

17,851

$ 20,136

Software

Cost-U-Less banner

Non-compete
agreements

Total

$

15,057

$

7,015

$

8,114

$

30,186

811

—

15,868

10,186

1,810

—

11,996

3,872

$

$

$

$

—

12

7,027

—

—

—

—

7,027

$

$

$

$

—

9

8,123

2,853

1,538

11

4,402

811

21

31,018

13,039

3,348

11

$

$

$

16,398

3,721

$ 14,620

$

$

$

$

42THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012Work in process 
As at January 31, 2013 the Company had incurred $6,519 for intangible 
assets that were not yet available for use, and therefore not subject to 
amortization.

Intangible Asset Impairment Testing  
The  Company  determines  the  fair  value  of  the  Cost-U-Less  banner 
using  the  Relief  from  Royalty  approach.    This  method  requires 
management  to  make  long-term  assumptions  about  future  sales, 
terminal growth rates, royalty rates and discount rates.  Sales forecasts 
for the following financial year together with medium and terminal 
growth rates ranging from 2% to 5% are used to estimate future sales, 
to which a royalty rate of 0.5% is applied.  The present value of this 
royalty  stream  is  compared  to  the  carrying  value  of  the  asset.      No 
impairment has been identified on intangible assets and management 
considers  reasonably  foreseeable  changes  in  key  assumptions  are 
unlikely to produce an intangible asset impairment.   

9. 

INCOME TAXES

The following are the major components of the income tax expense:

Income tax expense varies from the amounts that would be computed 
by applying the statutory income tax rate to earnings before taxes for 
the following reasons:

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Net earnings before income
     taxes

Combined statutory income
     tax rate

Expected income tax
     expense

$ 91,309

$ 83,283

28.2%

30.3%

$ 25,749

$ 25,235

Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:

Non-deductible expenses/
     non-taxable income

Withholding taxes

Impact of change in tax rates

Over provision in prior years

Other

$

(183)

$

(136)

207

(48)

(201)

637

1,443

(978)

(234)

(8)

Provision for income taxes

$ 26,161

$ 25,322

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Income tax rate

28.7%

30.4%

$ 30,199

207

740

$

8,969

1,443

The decrease in the combined statutory income tax rate is due to a 
reduction in Canadian substantively enacted tax rates and a change in 
the foreign subsidiaries’ earnings.

(21)

Deferred  income  tax  charged  (credited)  to  other  comprehensive 
income during the year is as follows:

Current tax expense:

Current tax on earnings for
     the year

Withholding taxes

(Over) under provision in
     prior years

Deferred tax expense:

Origination and reversal of
     temporary differences

Impact of change in tax rates

Over provision in prior years

$ 31,146

$ 10,391

$ (3,996)

$ 16,122

(48)

(941)

(978)

(213)

(4,985)

14,931

Income taxes

$ 26,161

$ 25,322

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Net investment hedge:

Origination and reversal of
     temporary difference

Impact of change in tax rates

Defined benefit plan 
actuarial loss:

Origination and reversal of
     temporary difference

Impact of change in tax rates

$

$

56

6

62

$

$

(30)

2

(28)

$

(958)

$ (5,540)

(27)

(985)

(1)

(5,541)

$

(923)

$ (5,569)

43NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIncome tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

January 31, 2013

February 1, 2012

Taxes (charged) 
credited to net 
earnings

Taxes (charged) 
credited to OCI

Foreign exchange
differences recognized
in OCI

January 31, 2013

Deferred tax assets:

Goodwill & intangible assets

$

Property & equipment

Inventory

Share-based compensation and
     long-term incentive plans

Defined benefit plan obligation

Accrued expenses not
     deductible for tax

Other

Deferred tax liabilities:

Net investment hedge

Investment in jointly controlled
     entity

Deferred limited partnership
     earnings

Other

467

8,089

1,507

1,693

7,366

3,756

898

$

23,776

$

(1,179)

(1,086)

(16,260)

(269)

$ (18,794)

$

4,982

Recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as follows:

Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

$

(50)

$

2,337

113

1,678

(744)

430

821

4,585

—

(63)

390

73

400

4,985

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

—

—

—

—

985

—

—

985

(62)

—

—

—

(62)

923

$

$

$

$

$

1

3

(6)

—

—

(12)

2

(12)

—

—

—

—

—

$

418

10,429

1,614

3,371

7,607

4,174

1,721

$ 29,334

$ (1,241)

(1,149)

(15,870)

(196)

$ (18,456)

(12)

$ 10,878

$ 12,904

(2,026)

$ 10,878

44THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012January 31, 2012

February 1, 2011

Taxes (charged)
credited to net
earnings

Taxes (charged)
credited to OCI

Foreign exchange
differences recognized
in OCI

January 31, 2012

Deferred tax assets:

Goodwill & intangible assets

$

Property & equipment

Inventory

Share-based compensation and
     long-term incentive plans

Defined benefit plan obligation

Accrued expenses not
     deductible for tax

Other

Deferred tax liabilities:

Net investment hedge

Investment in jointly controlled
     entity

Deferred limited partnership
     earnings

Other

402

6,489

1,092

1,551

2,401

4,162

810

$

16,907

$

(1,207)

(968)

—

(302)

$

$

(2,477)

14,430

Recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as follows:

Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities

$

$

$

60

1,599

429

144

(576)

(330)

88

1,414

—

(118)

(16,260)

33

$ (16,345)

$ (14,931)

$

$

$

$

$

—

—

—

—

5,541

—

—

5,541

28

—

—

—

28

5,569

$

$

$

$

$

5

1

(14)

(2)

—

(76)

—

(86)

—

—

—

—

—

$

467

8,089

1,507

1,693

7,366

3,756

898

$ 23,776

$ (1,179)

(1,086)

(16,260)

(269)

$ (18,794)

(86)

$

4,982

$

7,422

(2,440)

$

4,982

In assessing the recovery of deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is probable that the deferred income tax assets will be 
realized.  The recognition and measurement of the current and deferred tax assets and liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application 
of complex tax regulations and in the assessment of the recoverability of deferred tax assets.  The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets 
is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the temporary differences are deductible.

Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates as a result of future events, including changes in income tax laws or the outcome of 
tax reviews by tax authorities and related appeals.  To the extent the final outcome is different from the amounts initially recorded, such differences, 
which could be significant, will impact the tax provision in the period in which the outcome is determined.

No deferred tax has been recognized in respect of temporary differences associated with investment in subsidiaries where the Company is 
in a position to control the timing and reversal of the differences and it is probable that such differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.  
The temporary differences associated with the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are approximately $53,000 at January 31, 2013 (January 31, 2012 – 
$41,000).

10.  OTHER ASSETS

Investment in jointly controlled entity (Note 23)

Long-term receivable (Note 5)

Other

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$

8,590

$

2,626

3,053

8,156

2,507

1,687

$ 14,269

$

12,350

45NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS11.  LONG-TERM DEBT

12.  POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

incorporated 

The  Company  sponsors  defined  benefit  and  defined  contribution 
pension plans covering the majority of Canadian employees.  Effective 
January 1, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated 
staff  pension  plan,  which 
legislated  changes, 
administrative practice, and added a defined contribution provision 
(the “Amended Plan”).  Under the Amended Plan, all members as of 
December 31, 2011 who did not meet a qualifying threshold based on 
number of years in the pension plan and age were transitioned to the 
defined contribution pension plan effective January  1, 2011 and no 
longer accumulate years of service under the defined benefit pension 
plan.   The  defined  benefit  pension  previously  earned  by  members 
transitioned to the defined contribution plan, will continue to accrue 
in  accordance  with  the  terms  of  the  plan  based  on  the  member’s 
current  pensionable  earnings.    Members  who  met  the  qualifying 
threshold  on  January  1,  2011,  elected  between  accruing  a  defined 
contribution  benefit  and  continuing  to  accrue  a  defined  benefit 
pension in accordance with the provisions of the Amended Plan.

The defined benefit pension plans are based on years of service 
and final average salary.  The Company uses actuarial reports prepared 
by independent actuaries for funding and accounting purposes as at 
January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012.  The accrued pension benefits 
and the market value of the plans’ net assets were last determined by 
actuarial valuation as at January 1, 2013.  The next actuarial valuation 
is  required  as  at  January  1,  2014.   The  Company  also  sponsors  an 
employee savings  plan  covering  all  U.S. employees with  at  least  six 
months  of  service.    Under  the  terms  of  the  plan,  the  Company  is 
obligated to make a 50% matching contribution up to 6% of eligible 
compensation.

During  the  year  ended  January 31,  2013,  the  Company 
contributed $5,583 to its defined benefit pension plans (January 31, 
2012 - $4,340).  During the year ended January 31, 2013, the Company 
contributed  $2,002  to 
its  defined  contribution  pension  plans 
(January 31, 2012 - $1,803).  The current best estimate of the Company's 
funding obligation for the defined benefit pension plans for the year 
commencing February 1, 2013 is $3,300.  The actual amount paid may 
vary from the estimate based on actuarial valuations being completed, 
investment  performance,  volatility  in  discount  rates,  regulatory 
requirements and other factors.

The following significant actuarial assumptions were employed 

to measure the plan:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Discount rate on plan liabilities

Rate of compensation increase

Discount rate on plan expense

Inflation assumption

Expected return on plan assets

4.3%

4.0%

4.5%

2.0%

6.5%

4.5%

4.0%

5.8%

2.0%

6.5%

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Current:

Revolving loan facilities (1)

$

39,968

$

Notes payable

Finance lease liabilities

199

250

—

268

361

$

40,417

$

629

Non-current

Revolving loan facilities (1)

$

—

$

36,187

Revolving loan facilities (2)

Senior notes (3)

Revolving loan facilities (4)

Notes payable

Finance lease liabilities

52,499

69,461

718

189

70

68,850

69,626

—

391

209

$ 122,937

$ 175,263

Total

$ 163,354

$ 175,892

(1)   The  US$52,000  committed,  revolving  loan  facilities  mature 
December 31, 2013 and bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread.  The loan 
facilities are secured by a floating first charge against the assets of the 
Company and rank pari passu with the US$70,000 senior notes and the 
$170,000 Canadian Operations loan facilities.  At January 31, 2013, the 
Company had drawn US$40,000 (January 31, 2012 – US$36,000) on this 
facility.

(2)   Canadian Operations have an extendible, committed, revolving 
loan facility of $170,000  for working capital requirements and general 
business purposes. This facility, which matures on December 31, 2015 
is secured by a floating charge against the assets of the Company and 
rank pari passu with the US$70,000 senior notes and the US$52,000 
loan facilities in International Operations.  These facilities bear a floating 
interest rate based on Bankers Acceptances rates plus stamping fees 
or the Canadian prime interest rate.

(3)   The  US$70,000  senior  notes  mature on  June  15,  2014  and  bear 
interest at a rate of 6.55%, payable semi-annually.  The notes are secured 
by a floating charge against the assets of the Company and rank pari 
passu with the $170,000 Canadian Operations loan facilities and the US
$52,000 loan facilities in International Operations.  The Company has 
entered into interest rate swaps resulting in floating interest costs on 
US$28,000  of  its  senior  notes  (January 31,  2012  –  US$28,000).   The 
interest rate swaps mature June 15, 2014.

(4)   In October 2012, the Company completed the refinancing of the 
committed,  revolving  loan  facility  of  US$20,000  that  matured  on 
October 31, 2012.  The new committed, revolving facility provides the 
Company with up to US$30,000 for working capital requirements and 
general business purposes.  This facility, which matures October  31, 
2015, bears a floating rate of interest based on LIBOR plus a spread and 
is  secured  by  a  charge  against  certain  accounts  receivable  and 
inventories of the International Operations.  At January 31, 2013, the 
International  Operations  had  drawn US$719  (January 31,  2012  –  US
$NIL) on this facility.

46THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012The average life expectancy in years of a member who reaches normal 
retirement age of 65 is as follows:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Average life expectancies at age 65 for current pensioners:

Male

Female

19.8

22.1

19.7

22.1

Average life expectancies at age 65 for current members aged 45:

Male

Female

19.9

21.8

19.8

21.8

Assumptions regarding future mortality experience are set based on 
actuarial advice in accordance with published statistics and experience.  
Mortality assumptions have been based on the 1994 United Pensioners 
Mortality Table with projections to 2015 using scale AA.

Information  on  the  Company’s  defined  benefit  plans, 

in 

aggregate, is as follows:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Sensitivity of key assumptions
The  following  table  outlines  the  key  assumptions  for  2012  and  the 
sensitivity of a 1% change in each of the assumptions on the  defined 
benefit plan obligations and cost for the defined benefit pension plans.  
The table reflects the impact on both the current service and interest 
cost expense components.

The sensitivity analysis provided in the key table is hypothetical 
and  should  be  used  with  caution.    The  sensitivities  of  each  key 
assumption have been calculated independently of any changes  in 
other key assumptions.  Actual experience may result in changes in a 
number of key  assumptions simultaneously.  Changes in one factor 
may result in changes in another, which could amplify or reduce the 
impact of such assumptions.

Defined benefit
plan obligations

Benefit plan cost

Discount rate: 4.3%

Impact of:

1% increase

1% decrease

$ (14,669)

$

19,075

$

$

(439)

439

The major categories of plan assets as a percentage of total plan assets 
are listed below.  The pension plans have no investment in the shares 
of the Company.

Plan assets:

Fair value, beginning of year

$

57,893

$

58,773

Expected return on plan assets

Benefits paid

Employer contributions

Employee contributions

Actuarial gains/(losses)
     recognized in OCI

3,800

(4,441)

5,583

12

2,292

3,777

(5,681)

4,340

20

(3,336)

Plan assets:

Equity securities

Debt securities

Other

Total

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

62%

33%

5%

100%

60%

36%

4%

100%

Fair value, end of year

$

65,139

$

57,893

The  following  pension  expenses  have  been  charged  to  the 
consolidated statement of earnings:

Plan obligations:

Defined benefit obligation,
     beginning of year

Current service costs

Employee contributions

Accrued interest on benefits

Benefits paid

Actuarial losses recognized in
     OCI

Defined benefit obligation, end of
     year

Plan deficit

$ (85,509)

$

(67,773)

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

(2,870)

(12)

(3,748)

4,441

(5,872)

(2,192)

(20)

(3,734)

5,681

(17,471)

Employee costs (Note 17)

Defined benefit pension plan,
     current service costs included
     in post-employment benefits

Defined contribution pension
     plan

Savings plan for U.S. employees

$ (93,570)

$ (28,431)

$

$

(85,509)

(27,616)

$

2,870

$

2,192

2,001

411

1,803

411

$

5,282

$

4,406

The defined benefit obligation  exceeds the fair value of plan assets as 
noted in the table.

The expected return on plan assets has been derived from the 
expected returns from each of the main asset classes.  The expected 
return  for  each  asset  class  reflects  a  combination  of  historical 
performance  analysis  and  the  forward-looking  view  of  the  financial 
markets.  The assumptions used are the best estimates chosen from a 
range of possible actuarial assumptions, which may not necessarily be 
borne out in practice.

Interest expense (Note 18)

Expected return on pension plan
     assets

$ (3,800)

$ (3,777)

Interest on pension plan liabilities

3,748

3,734

47NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
The following amounts have been included in Other Comprehensive 
Income:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Current Year:

Actuarial gains/(losses)

Actuarial loss on plan obligation

Taxes on cumulative actuarial
     movement in OCI

Net actuarial movement
     recognized in OCI

$

2,292

(5,872)

$

(3,336)

(17,471)

985

5,541

$ (2,595)

$ (15,266)

Cumulative gains/losses recognized in OCI:

Cumulative gross actuarial
     movement in OCI

Taxes on cumulative actuarial
     movement in OCI

Cumulative net actuarial
     movement recognized in OCI

$ (22,966)

$ (19,386)

4,059

3,074

$ (18,907)

$ (16,312)

The actual return on the plans assets is summarized as follows:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Expected return on plan assets

$

3,800

$

3,777

Actuarial movement recognized in
     OCI reflecting the difference 
     between expected and actual
     return assets

2,292

(3,336)

Actual return on plan assets

$

6,092

$

441

13.  SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The  Company  offers  the  following  share-based  payment  plans:  
Restricted Share Units (RSU’s); Performance Share Units (PSU’s); Share 
Options; Director Deferred Share Units (DSU’s); and an Employee Share 
Purchase  Plan.   The  purpose  of  these  plans  is  to  directly  align  the 
interests of the participants and the shareholders of the Company by 
providing compensation that is dependent on the performance of the 
Company’s common shares. 

 The total expense relating to share-based payment plans for the 
year ended January 31,  2013 was $8,440 (January 31,  2012 - $4,726).  
The  carrying  amount  of  the  Company’s share-based  compensation 
arrangements  including  RSU,  PSU,  share  option  and  DSU  plans  are 
recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as follows:

Accounts payable and accrued
     liabilities

Other long-term liabilities

Contributed surplus

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$ 7,437

$

4,611

5,506

1,916

3,207

1,611

Total

$ 14,859

$

9,429

Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units
The  Company  has  granted  Restricted  Share  Units  and  Performance 
Share Units to officers and senior management.  Each RSU entitles the 
participant to receive a cash payment equal to the market value of the 
number of notional shares granted at the end of the vesting period.  
The RSU account for each participant includes the value of dividends 
from the Company as if reinvested in additional RSU’s.  RSU awards vest 
with the employee on the third fiscal year following the date of the 
grant to which the award relates.  Compensation expense is measured 
initially based on the fair market value of the Company’s shares at the 
grant date and subsequently adjusted for additional shares granted 
based on the reinvestment of notional dividends and the market value 
of  the  shares  at  the  end  of  each  reporting  period.   The  associated 
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period based 
on the estimated total compensation to be paid out at the end of the 
vesting period.

Each PSU entitles the participant to receive a cash payment equal 
to the market value of the number of notional units granted at the end 
of  the  vesting  period  based  on  the  achievement  of  specific 
performance  based  criteria.   The  PSU  account  for  each  participant 
includes the value of dividends from the Company as if reinvested in 
additional PSU’s.  PSU awards vest with the employee on the third fiscal 
year  following  the  date  of  the  grant  to  which  the  award  relates.  
Compensation expense is measured initially based on the fair market 
value  of  the  Company’s shares  at  the  grant  date  and  subsequently 
adjusted for additional shares granted based on the reinvestment of 
notional dividends and the market value of the shares at the end of 
each  reporting  period.    The  associated  compensation  expense  is 
recognized  over  the  vesting  period  based  on  the  estimated  total 
compensation to be paid out at the end of the vesting period factoring 
in the probability of the performance criteria being met during that 
period.

Compensation costs related to the RSU’s and PSU’s for the year 

ended January 31, 2013 are $5,527 (January 31, 2012 - $2,981).  

Share Option Plan
The Company has a Share Option Plan that provides for the granting 
of  options  to certain  officers  and  senior  management.    Options  are 
granted at fair market value based on the volume weighted-average 
closing  price  of  the  Company’s  shares  for  the  five  trading  days 
preceding the grant date.  Effective June 14, 2011, the Share Option 
Plan was amended and restated.  The amendments afford the Board of 
Directors the discretion to award options giving the holder the choice, 
upon exercise, to either deduct a portion of all dividends declared after 
the grant date from the options exercise price or to exercise the option 
at the strike price specified at the grant date.  Each option is exercisable 
into one share of the Company at the price specified in the terms of 
the option, or the employee may elect to acquire shares or receive a 
cash  payment  based  on  the  excess  of  the  fair  market  value  of  the 
Company’s shares over the exercise price.  The fair value of the share-
based compensation is recognized in net earnings over the vesting 
period.

The maximum number of shares available for issuance is a fixed 

number set at 4,354,020, representing 9% of the Company’s issued 
and outstanding shares at January 31, 2013.  Fair value of these 
options is determined using an option pricing model.  Share options 
granted vest on a graduated basis over five years and are exercisable 
over a period of seven to ten years.  The share option compensation 
cost recorded for the year ended January 31, 2013 is $1,288 
( January 31, 2012 - $867).

48THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
The  expected  dividend  yield  is  estimated  based  on  the  quarterly 
dividend rate and the closing share price on the date the options are 
granted.  The expected share price volatility is estimated based on the 
Company’s  historical  volatility  over  a  period  consistent  with  the 
expected  life  of  the  options.   The  risk-free interest rate  is  estimated 
based on the Government of Canada bond yield for a term to maturity 
equal to the expected life of the options.

The fair values for options issued during the year were calculated based 
on the following assumptions:

2012

2011

Fair value of options granted

$   3.35 to 4.62

$   3.61 to 4.74

Exercise price

Dividend yield

Annual risk-free interest rate

Expected share price volatility

$   21.86

$   20.62

4.7%

1.7%

28.0%

4.5%

2.7%

29.2%

The assumptions used to measure options at the balance sheet dates 
were as follows:

Dividend yield

Annual risk-free interest rate

2012

4.5%

1.4%

2011

5.4%

1.2%

Expected share price volatility

20.9% to 25.8%

26.9% to 29.5%

The following continuity schedules reconcile the movement in outstanding options during the year:

Number of options outstanding

Declining Strike Price Options

Standard Options

Outstanding options, beginning of year

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited or cancelled

Outstanding options, end of year

Exercisable at end of year

2012

2011

2012

2011

315,812

328,677

—

(64,474)

—

315,812

—

—

548,486

63,177

(26,430)

(28,301)

509,200

56,186

—

(16,900)

580,015

315,812

556,932

548,486

—

—

59,165

—

Weighted-average exercise price

Declining Strike Price Options

Standard Options

Outstanding options, beginning of year

$

20.34

$

—

$

17.45

$

17.10

2012

2011

2012

2011

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited or cancelled

Outstanding options, end of year

Exercisable at end of year

21.86

—

21.11

21.12

—

$

$

20.62

—

—

20.34

—

$

$

21.86

15.25

17.31

18.07

15.25

$

$

20.62

—

16.92

17.45

—

$

$

49NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSummary of options outstanding by grant year

Outstanding

Exercisable

Range of
exercise price

Number
outstanding

Weighted-average
remaining
contractual years

Weighted-average
exercise price

Options 
exercisable

Weighted-average
exercise price

$

$

$

$

15.25

19.11-19.74

19.71-20.62

21.39-21.86

217,169

220,400

340,296

359,082

6.4

7.2

5.5

6.2

$

$

$

$

15.25

19.12

19.94

21.47

59,165

$

15.25

NIL

NIL

NIL

N/A

N/A

N/A

Grant
year

2009

2010

2011

2012

Director Deferred Share Unit Plan
The  Director  DSU  Plan  is  available  for  independent  Directors.  
Participants are credited with deferred share units based on the portion 
of fees each participant elects to allocate to the DSU.  Each deferred 
share unit entitles the holder to receive a share of the Company.  The 
deferred share units are exercisable by the holder at any time but no 
later than December 31 of the first calendar year commencing after 
the holder ceases to be a Director.  A participant may elect at the time 
of exercise of any deferred share units, subject to the consent of the 
Company, to have the Company pay an amount in cash equal to the 
aggregate current market value of the shares, determined based on 
the closing price of the shares on the TSX on the trading day preceding 
the exercise date, in consideration for the surrender by the participant 
to the Company the right to receive shares from exercising the deferred 
share units.

Compensation  expense  is  measured  based  on  the  fair  market 
value  at  each  reporting  date. 
  The  deferred  share  unit  plan 
compensation  recorded  for  the  year  ended  January 31,  2013  is  an 
expense  of  $969  (January 31,  2012  –$288).    The  total  number  of 
deferred  share  units  outstanding  at  January 31,  2013  is  136,685 
(January 31,  2012 – 118,262).  There were 4,698 deferred share units 
exercised during the year ended January 31, 2013 (January 31, 2012 – 
37,236).  These deferred share units were settled in cash.  

Employee Share Purchase Plan
The  Employee  Share  Purchase  Plan  provides  participants  with  the 
opportunity  to acquire an ownership interest in the Company.  The 
Company  contributes  an  additional  33%  of  the  amount  invested, 
subject to a maximum annual contribution of 2% of the participants' 
base salary.  The plan is administered by a trustee who uses the funds 
received to purchase shares on the TSX on behalf of the participating 
employees.  These shares are registered in the name of the plan trustee 
on behalf of the participants.  The Company’s contribution to the plan 
is recorded as compensation expense.    The employee share purchase 
plan compensation recorded for the year ended January 31,  2013 is 
$656 (January 31, 2012 – $590).

14.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks including 
liquidity  risk,  credit  risk  and  market  risk.   The  Company’s  overall  risk 
management program focuses on minimizing potential adverse effects 
on financial performance.

The Company manages funding and financial risk management 
with oversight provided by the Board of Directors, who also approve 
specific financial transactions.  The Company uses derivative financial 
instruments only to hedge exposures arising in respect of underlying 
business requirements and not for speculative purposes.

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they come due or can do so only at excessive cost. The 
Company’s operational cash flow is reasonably stable and predictable. This reflects the business risk profile of the majority of markets in which the 
Company operates and its product mix.  Cash flow forecasts are produced regularly and reviewed against the Company’s debt portfolio capacity 
and maturity profile to assist management in identifying future liquidity requirements.  The Company’s funding strategy is to ensure a mix of funding 
sources offering flexibility and cost effectiveness to match the business requirements.

The Company is financed by a combination of cash flow from operating activities, bank advances, senior notes and committed revolving loan 
facilities.  At January 31, 2013, the Company had undrawn committed revolving loan facilities available of $144,122 (January 31, 2012 - $126,445) 
which mature in 2013 and 2015 (see Note 11).

The following table analyzes the Company’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period from the balance 
sheet date to the contractual maturity date.  The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows or an estimation in 
respect of floating interest rate liabilities, and as a result may not agree to the amounts disclosed on the balance sheet.

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018+

Total

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$ 130,501

Interest rate swap payable(1)

Current portion of long-term debt (Note 11)

Long-term debt (Note 11)

Operating leases

Total

1,113

40,864

5,766

23,490

$ 201,734

—

417

—

73,025

19,960

93,402

—

—

—

53,583

16,677

70,260

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

14,380

14,380

12,648

12,648

48,732

48,732

$ 130,501

1,530

40,864

132,374

135,887

$ 441,156

(1)  Based on variable pay interest.  This will be partially offset by a fixed interest receipt.

50THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012 
Credit risk  
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or 
counterparty  to  a  financial  instrument  fails  to  meet  its  contractual 
obligations.  The Company’s exposures to credit risk arise primarily from 
holdings of cash and its customer and commercial accounts receivable.
To  mitigate  credit  risk,  the  Company  maintains  deposits  with 
financial institutions with minimum equivalent short-term credit ratings 
of “A1.”   The maximum exposure on cash is equal to the carrying amount 
of these instruments.

It  is the Company’s policy that customers who wish to trade on 
credit  terms  are  subject  to  credit  verification  procedures  including 
policies  governing:  credit  approvals,  limits,  collections  and  fraud 
prevention.    The  Company  provides  impairment  allowances  for 
potentially uncollectible accounts receivable.  Receivable balances are 
comprised of approximately forty thousand customers spread across a 
wide geography, substantially reducing the Company’s risk through the 
diversity  of  its  customer  base.    Further,  receivables  are  centrally  
monitored  on  an  ongoing  basis  with  the  result  that  the  Company’s 
exposure  to  individual  customers  is  generally  not  significant.    The 
maximum  exposure  is  $72,666  (January  31,  2012  -  $79,046).    The 
Company does not have any individual customers greater than 10% of 
total  accounts  receivable.    At  January 31,  2013,  the  Company’s 
maximum credit risk exposure is $86,708 (January 31, 2012 - $92,652).  
Of this amount, $17,850 (January 31,  2012 - $18,614) is more than 60 
days  past  due.   The  Company has  recorded an  allowance  against  its 
maximum exposure to credit risk of $14,042 (January 31, 2012 - $13,606) 
which is based on historical payment records for similar financial assets.
As at January 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has no significant 

credit risk related to derivative financial instruments.

Market risk
(a)  Currency risk 

The  Company  operates  internationally  and  is 
exposed  to  foreign exchange  risk  arising  from  various  currency 
exposures,  primarily  with  respect  to  the  U.S.  dollar.    Foreign 
exchange risk arises from U.S. dollar denominated borrowings and 
net investments in foreign operations.

Management  is responsible for managing foreign currency 
risk.  The Company’s U.S. dollar net investment is exposed to foreign 
currency translation risk.  A significant portion of this risk has been 
hedged with U.S. dollar denominated borrowings.

In respect of recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities  
the  Company  has  limited  exposure.    Procurement  and  related 
borrowing activity are generally conducted in currencies matching 
cash  flows  generated  by  underlying  operations,  providing  an 
economic  hedge  without  sophisticated  treasury  management.  

(b) 

Short-term imbalances in foreign currency holdings are rectified 
by buying or selling at spot rates when necessary.

Management considers a 10% variation in the Canadian dollar 
relative to the U.S. dollar reasonably possible.  Considering all major 
exposures to the U.S. dollar as described above, a 10% appreciation 
of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar in the year-end rate 
would cause net income to decrease by approximately $100.  A 
10% depreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar year-
end rate would cause net income to increase by approximately 
$100.

Interest rate risk  Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future 
cash  flows  of  a  financial  instrument  will  fluctuate  because  of 
changes  in  market  interest  rates.   The  Company  is  exposed  to 
interest rate risk primarily through its long-term borrowings.  The 
Company manages exposure to interest rate risk by monitoring its 
blend of fixed and floating interest rates, and modifying this blend 
using  interest  rate  swaps.    Under  the  terms  of  the  swaps,  the 
Company receives fixed interest and pays floating rate interest at 
a fixed spread above three-month LIBOR.  The goal of management 
is to manage the trade-off between obtaining the most beneficial 
effective rates of interest, while minimizing the impact of interest 
rate volatility on earnings.

Management considers a 100 basis point change in interest 
rates  reasonably  possible.    Considering  all  major  exposures  to 
interest rates as described above, a 100 basis point increase in the 
risk-free rate would cause net income to decrease by approximately 
$1,170.  A 100 basis point decrease would cause net income to 
increase by approximately $1,170.

(c)  Accounting classifications and fair value estimation  The  following 
table comprises the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial 
instruments.  Financial instruments are either carried at amortized 
cost using the effective interest rate method or fair value. 

The Company uses a three-level hierarchy to categorize financial 
instruments carried at fair value as follows:

•  Level 1 – Fair values measured using quoted prices (unadjusted) in 

active markets for identical instruments

•  Level  2  –  Fair  values  measured  using  directly  or  indirectly 

observable inputs, other than those included in Level 1

•  Level 3 – Fair values measured using inputs that are not based on 

observable market data

These amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future.  These calculations are subjective in nature, involve 
uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment.

January 31, 2013

Cash

Accounts receivable

Other financial assets

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Financial derivative instruments(1)

Current portion of long-term debt

Long-term debt(1)

Assets (Liabilities) carried at 
amortized cost 

Assets (Liabilities) 
carried at fair value

Maturity Carrying amount

Fair value

Carrying amount

Short-term

Short-term

Long-term

Short-term

Long-term

Short-term

Long-term

$

38,675

$

38,675

$

70,040

3,664

70,040

3,664

(130,501)

(130,501)

—

(40,417)

(123,882)

—

(40,417)

(125,046)

—

—

—

—

945

—

—

(1) These items total $122,937 which comprise the carrying amount of debt presented as long-term (Note 11).

51NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJanuary 31, 2012

Cash

Accounts receivable

Other financial assets

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Financial derivative instruments(1)

Current portion of long-term debt

Long-term debt(1)

Assets (Liabilities) carried at 
amortized cost 

Assets (Liabilities) 
carried at fair value

Maturity Carrying amount

Fair value

Carrying amount

Short-term

Short-term

Long-term

Short-term

Long-term

Short-term

Long-term

$

26,984

$

26,984

$

76,539

3,552

76,539

3,552

(122,349)

(122,349)

—

(629)

—

(629)

(176,779)

(178,759)

—

—

—

—

1,516

—

—

(1) These items total $175,263 which comprise the carrying amount of debt presented as long-term (Note 11).

The methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the 
Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

• 

• 

• 

financial 

The  fair  value  of  short-term  financial  instruments  approximates 
their carrying values due to their immediate or short-term period 
to maturity.  Any differences between fair value and book values 
of  short-term 
instruments  are  considered  to  be 
insignificant.
The fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates is estimated 
by discounting the expected future cash flows using the current 
risk-free interest rate on an instrument with similar terms adjusted 
for an appropriate risk premium for the Company’s credit profile.
The derivative financial instruments have been measured using a 
generally  accepted  valuation  technique.    The  pricing  model 
incorporates  current  market  measures  for  interest  rates,  credit 
spreads, volatility levels and other market-based pricing factors.

The  portion  of  long-term  debt  in  an  effective  fair  value  hedging 
relationship and derivative financial instruments are classified as Level 
2, as they are primarily  derived from observable  interest rates.  There 
would  be  no  significant  effect  on  net  income  if  one  or  more  of  the 
assumptions used to fair value these instruments were changed to other 
reasonably possible alternatives.  No financial instruments have been 
classified as Level 1 or Level 3.

Financial derivative instruments
The  Company  holds  interest  rate  swaps  with  a  notional  value  of  US
$28,000 (January 31, 2012 – US$28,000) to hedge a portion of the fixed 
rate  senior  notes  due  in  2014.    Under  the  terms  of  the  swaps,  the 
Company receives fixed interest and pays floating rate interest at a fixed 
spread above three-month LIBOR.  

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding financial 
derivative instruments at January 31:

January 31, 2013

Notional value

Interest rate

Fair value

Interest rate swaps in
effective fair value
hedging relationship

US$28,000

(2011 - US$28,000)

LIBOR plus
3.67%

$945

(2011 - $1,516)

Capital management
The Company’s objectives in managing capital are to deploy capital to 
provide an appropriate total return to shareholders while maintaining 
a capital structure that provides the flexibility to take advantage of the 
growth opportunities  of  the  business, maintain  existing  assets, meet 
obligations and financial covenants and enhance shareholder value.  The 
capital structure of the Company consists of bank advances, long-term 
debt  and  shareholders’  equity.    The  Company  manages  capital  to 
optimize efficiency through an appropriate balance of debt and equity. 
In order to maintain or adjust its capital structure, the Company may 
purchase shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids, 
issue additional shares, borrow additional funds, adjust the amount of 
dividends paid or refinance debt at different terms and conditions.

The  Company’s  process  and  policies  for  managing  capital  are 
monitored by management and are reflected in the following measures:

(a)  Debt-to-equity  ratio At January 31,  2013, the debt-to-equity  ratio 
was 0.55 compared to 0.62 last year.  The debt-to-equity  ratio is 
within  the  Company’s  objectives.    The  debt-to-equity  ratio  is 
calculated as follows:

Current portion of long-term
     debt

Long-term debt

Total debt

Total equity

Debt-to-equity ratio

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

$

$

$

40,417

122,937

163,354

296,250

0.55

$

$

$

629

175,263

175,892

283,709

0.62

(b)  Financial covenants As a result of borrowing agreements entered 
into by the  Company, there are certain  financial  covenants that 
must be maintained.  Financial covenants include a fixed charge 
coverage  ratio,  minimum  current  ratio,  a  leverage  test  and  a 
minimum net worth test.  Compliance with financial covenants is 
reported  quarterly  to  the  Board  of  Directors.    During  the  years 
ended January 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company is in compliance 
with all financial covenants.  Other than the requirements imposed 
by these borrowing agreements and solvency tests imposed by 
the CBCA, the Company is not subject to any externally imposed 
capital requirements.

Capital management objectives are reviewed on an annual basis.  The 
capital management objectives were substantially unchanged for the 
year ended January 31, 2013.

52THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 201215.  SHARE CAPITAL  

18.  INTEREST EXPENSE

Authorized – The Company has an unlimited number of shares.  

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Shares

Consideration

Interest on long-term debt

$ 6,637

$ 6,484

Balance at January 31, 2012

48,378,000

Issued under option plans (Note 13)

10,721

$ 165,133

$

225

Balance at January 31, 2013

48,388,721

$ 165,358

16.  EXPENSES BY NATURE  

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Employee costs (Note 17)

$ 220,070

$

210,893

Amortization

Operating lease rentals

Foreign exchange loss

37,149

24,304

106

36,572

23,391

20

17.  EMPLOYEE COSTS

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Wages, salaries and benefits
     including bonus

Post-employment benefits (Note 12)

Share-based compensation
     (Note 13)

$ 206,348

$ 201,761

5,282

8,440

4,406

4,726

Included in the above are the following amounts in respect of key
     management compensation:

Wages, salaries and benefits
     including bonus

Post-employment benefit expense

Share-based compensation

$

4,238

$

3,893

646

5,234

420

2,777

Key  management  personnel  are  those  individuals  who  have  the 
authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the 
activities of the Company.  The Company’s key management personnel 
are comprised of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and 
the four senior officers.

Fair value movement of derivative
     financial instruments in
     effective fair value hedging
     relationships

Expected return on pension plan
     assets

Interest on pension plan liabilities

Interest income

Less: interest capitalized

26

(3,800)

3,748

(296)

(506)

(10)

(3,777)

3,734

(244)

(161)

Interest expense

$ 5,809

$ 6,026

19.  DIVIDENDS

The  following  is  a  reconciliation  of  the  dividends  and  distributions 
recorded in retained earnings to those paid in cash:

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Dividends recorded in retained
     earnings

Special distribution paid February 
     18, 2011 to unitholders of
     record on December 31, 2010

Dividends/distributions paid in
     cash

$ 50,320

$ 46,443

—

4,354

$ 50,320

$ 50,797

Dividends/distributions per share

$

1.04

$

1.05

The payment of dividends on the Company’s common shares is subject 
to the approval of the Board of Directors and is based upon, among 
other factors, the financial performance  of the Company, its current 
and anticipated future business needs, and the satisfaction of solvency 
tests imposed by the CBCA for the declaration of dividends.  Dividends 
are recognized as a liability in the consolidated financial statements in 
the year in which the dividends are approved by the Board of Directors.  
The declaration of distributions from the Fund was subject to the 
terms of the Fund’s Declaration of Trust and the discretion of the Board 
of Trustees.

On March 14, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of 
$0.28 per common share to be paid on April 15, 2013 to shareholders 
of record as of the close of business on March 28, 2013.

53NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
20.  NET EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic net earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted-average shares outstanding during the year.  The diluted net earnings per share 
takes into account the dilutive effect of all potential ordinary shares.  The average market value of the Company’s shares for purposes of calculating 
the dilutive effect of share options was based on quoted market prices for the period that the options were outstanding.

($ and shares in thousands, except earnings per share)

Year Ended

Diluted earnings per share calculation:

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Net earnings for the year (numerator for diluted earnings per share)

$

65,148

$

57,961

Weighted-average shares outstanding (denominator for basic earnings per share)

Dilutive effect of share-based compensation

Denominator for diluted earnings per share

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

21.  OPERATING LEASE COMMITMENTS

48,384

195

48,579

48,378

147

48,525

$

$

1.35

1.34

$

$

1.20

1.19

The Company leases various retail stores, offices, warehouses and equipment under non-cancellable operating leases.  The leases have varying 
terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights.  The future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Year Ended

January 31, 2013

January 31, 2012

Due within 1 year

Within 2 to 5 years inclusive

After 5 years

Land and buildings

Other leases

Land and buildings

Other leases

$ 22,739

$

62,755

48,732

751

910

—

$

23,636

$

67,950

55,792

738

1,015

—

22.  COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND

GUARANTEES

Commitments
In 2002, the Company signed a 30-year Master Franchise Agreement 
with Giant Tiger Stores Limited, based in Ottawa, Ontario which grants 
the Company the exclusive right to open Giant Tiger stores in western 
Canada.    Under  the  agreement, Giant Tiger  Stores Limited  provides 
product sourcing, merchandising, systems and administration support 
to the Company’s Giant Tiger stores in return for a royalty based on 
sales.  The Company is responsible for opening, owning, operating and 
providing distribution services to the stores.  The Company’s exclusivity 
right requires that a minimum number of Giant Tiger stores be opened 
each year, based on an expected roll-out of 72 stores over the term of 
the agreement.  As at January 31, 2013, the Company has opened 31 
Giant Tiger stores.  

As a  result of  store closures during  the  year, the  Company has 
fallen below the minimum number of stores required to maintain its 
exclusive right to open Giant Tiger stores in western Canada.  The loss 
of  exclusivity  does  not  constitute  an  event  of  default  under  the 
Company's master franchise rights and will not prevent the Company 
from continuing to operate its existing stores.

Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to audits by 
taxation  authorities.    While  the  Company  believes  that  its  filing 
positions are appropriate and supportable, the possibility exists that 
certain  matters  may  be  reviewed  and  challenged  by  the  taxation 
authorities.  The Company regularly reviews the potential for adverse 
outcomes  and  the  adequacy  of  its  tax  provisions.    The  Company 
believes that it has adequately provided for these matters.  If the final 
outcome differs materially from the provisions, the Company’s income 
tax expense and its earnings could be affected positively or negatively 
in the period in which the matters are resolved.

The Company is involved in various legal matters arising in the 
normal course of business.  The occurrence of the confirming future 
events  is  not  determinable  or  it  is  not  possible  to  determine  the 
amounts that may ultimately be assessed against the Company.  The 
resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse 
effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash 
flows.

54THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012   
 
  
     
     
   
Guarantees
The Company has provided the following significant guarantees to third parties:

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its current and former directors and officers to indemnify them, to the 
extent permitted by law, against any and all charges, costs, expenses, amounts paid in settlement and damages incurred by the directors and 
officers as a result of any lawsuit or any judicial, administrative or investigative proceeding in which the directors and officers are sued as a result 
of their service.  These indemnification claims will be subject to any statutory or other legal limitation period.  The nature of the indemnification 
agreements  prevents  the  Company  from  making  a  reasonable  estimate  of  the  maximum  potential  amount  it  could  be  required  to  pay  to 
counterparties.  The Company has purchased director and officer liability insurance.  No amount has been recorded in the financial statements 
with respect to these indemnification agreements.

In the normal course of operations, the Company provides indemnification agreements to counterparties for various events such as intellectual 
property right infringement, loss or damages to property, claims that may arise while providing services, violation of laws or regulations, or as a 
result of litigation that might be suffered by the counterparties.  The terms and nature of these indemnification agreements prevents the Company 
from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to counterparties.  No amount has been recorded 
in the financial statements with respect to these indemnification agreements.

23.  SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES

The Company’s principal operating subsidiaries are set out below:

Activity Country of Organization

Company

Subsidiary

Proportion of voting rights held by:

NWC GP Inc.

North West Company Holdings Inc.

The North West Company LP

NWC (U.S.) Holdings Inc.

The North West Company (International) Inc.

General Partner

Holding Company

Retailing

Holding Company

Retailing

The North West Finance Company Cooperatie U.A.

Finance Company

Canada

Canada

Canada

United States

United States

Netherlands

100%

100%

100%  (less one unit)

100%

100%

100%

The investment in jointly controlled entities comprises a 50% interest in a Canadian Arctic shipping company, Transport Nanuk Inc.    The Company’s 
share of its earnings for the year ended January 31, 2013 and 2012 was $434 and $797 respectively.  At January 31, 2013, the Company’s share of 
the net assets of its jointly controlled entity amount to $7,970 (January 31, 2012 - $7,646), comprised assets of $9,355 (January 31, 2012 - $9,227) 
and liabilities of $1,385 (January 31, 2012 - $1,581).

During the course of the year the Company purchased freight handling and shipping services from Transport Nanuk Inc. and its subsidiaries 
of $6,517 (January 31, 2012 - $7,144).  The contract terms are based on market rates for these types of services on similar arm’s length transactions. 

55NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSShareholder Information

Fiscal Year
Quarter Ended

2012

April 30, 2012

July 31, 2012

October 31, 2012

January 31, 2013

2011

April 30, 2011

July 31, 2011

October 31, 2011

January 31, 2012

2010

April 30, 2010

July 31, 2010

October 31, 2010

January 31, 20112

Share/Unit
Price High

Share/Unit
Price Low

Share/Unit
Price Close

Volume

$23.88

$19.34

$23.14

13,539,464

22.54

22.47

23.62

23.88

19.34

20.20

21.01

21.56

22.24

21.57

23.40

23.14

5,115,051

2,997,845

2,175,850

3,250,718

EPS/
EPU1

$1.34

0.28

0.38

0.36

0.32

$22.50

$17.85

$19.40

22,417,768

$1.19

22.50

20.85

20.63

20.72

19.65

18.51

17.85

18.28

19.78

20.23

18.78

19.40

5,885,378

5,802,416

4,020,971

6,709,003

0.26

0.31

0.35

0.27

$23.00

$17.02

$21.09

24,813,768

$1.44

19.50

20.22

21.99

23.00

17.60

17.02

19.27

19.93

18.75

19.78

20.68

21.09

4,899,200

4,148,526

5,118,932

10,647,110

0.37

0.42

0.46

0.19

1   Net earnings per share (unit) are on a diluted basis. 2010 has been restated for IFRS. 

2   Effective January 1, 2011, North West Company Fund converted to a share corporation, called 

The North West Company Inc.

Total Return Performance (% at January 31)

This  chart 
illustrates  the  relative  performance  of  shares/units  of  The  North 
West Company  Inc.  and  its  predecessor, North West Company  Fund, over  the  past 
five  years.  Effective  January  1,  2011,  North  West  Company  Fund  converted  to  a 
share  corporation  called  The  North  West  Company  Inc.  The  index  incorporates 
the reinvestment of dividends and income distributions.

The North West Company Inc.
Anticipated Dividend Dates*

Record Date: March 28, 2013
Payment Date: April 15, 2013

Record Date: June 28, 2013
Payment Date: July 15, 2013

Record Date: September 30, 2013
Payment Date: October 15, 2013

Record Date: December 31, 2013
Payment Date: January 15, 2014

*Dividends are subject to approval by the
  Board of Directors

2013 Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders 
of The North West Company Inc. will be held 
on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 at 11:30 am
in the Muriel Richardson Auditorium,  
Winnipeg Art Gallery, 
300 Memorial Boulevard,
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Transfer Agent and Registrar 
Canadian Stock Transfer Company Inc. 
(acts as administrative agent for 
CIBC Mellon Trust Company) 
Calgary and Toronto 
Toll-free: 1 800 387 0825 
www.cibcmellon.ca

Stock Exchange Listing 
The Toronto Stock Exchange

Stock Symbol NWC 
ISIN #: CA6632781093 
CUSIP #: 663278109

Number of shares issued and outstanding at 
January 31, 2013: 48,388,721

Auditors 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Compound Annual Growth (%)

56THE NORTH WEST COMPANY INC. 2012Corporate Governance

Complete disclosure of The North West Company Inc's. corporate governance is provided in the Company’s Management Information Circular, 
which is available on the Canadian Securities Administrators’ website at www.sedar.com or in the investor section of the Company’s website at 
www.northwest.ca.

Executives
International Operations*

Directors
The North West Company Inc.

Executives
Canadian Operations*

Edward S. Kennedy 
President & CEO

Craig T. Gilpin
Executive Vice-President
& Chief Corporate Officer

John D. King
Chief Financial Officer

Michael T. Beaulieu
Vice-President,
NWC Services

Edward S. Kennedy 
Chairman & CEO

Rex A. Wilhelm
President &
Chief Operating Officer

John D. King
Chief Financial Officer

J. Robert Cain
Vice-President,
Logistics & Supply Chain Services

David M. Chatyrbok
Vice-President,
Canadian Procurement & Marketing

Christie A. Frazier-Coleman
Vice-President,
Food Procurement & Marketing

Leanne Flewitt
Vice-President,
Merchandise Performance Services

Paulina Hiebert
Vice-President,
Legal & Corporate Secretary

Debbie A. Gillis
Vice-President,
Information Services

Paulina Hiebert
Vice-President,
Legal & Corporate Secretary

Daniel G. McConnell
Vice-President,
Real Estate & Store Development

Christine Reimer
Vice-President,
Canadian Sales & Operations

Michael E. Sorobey
Vice-President,
Logistics & Supply Chain Services

*as at April 8, 2013

Thomas M. Kallio
Vice-President & General Manager,
Cost-U-Less

Scott A. McKay
Vice-President,
General Merchandise
Procurement & Marketing

Kina Perez
Vice-President,
Human Resources

Walter E. Pickett
Vice-President & General Manager,
Alaska Commercial Company

James W. Walker
Vice-President & General Manager,
Wholesale Operations

H. Sanford Riley
Chairman

Edward S. Kennedy

Frank J. Coleman 1, 2

Wendy F. Evans 2, 3

Robert J. Kennedy 1, 3

Gary J. Lukassen 1, 2

Gary Merasty 1, 3

Eric L. Stefanson 1, 2

Annette M. Verschuren 2, 3

Board Committees
1  Governance & Nominating
2  Audit
3  Human Resources, Compensation, and

Pension

For additional copies of this report or for
general information about the Company, 
contact the Corporate Secretary:

The North West Company Inc.
Gibraltar House, 77 Main Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3C 2R1
T 204 934 1756  F 204 934 1317
investorrelations@northwest.ca
www.northwest.ca

57ANNUAL REPORTNor'Westers are associated with the vision, 
perseverance, and enterprising spirit of the original 
North West Company and Canada's early fur trade.  
We trace our roots to 1668, and the establishment of 
one of North America's early trading posts at 
Waskaganish on James Bay.  Today, we continue to 
embrace this pioneering culture as true "frontier 
merchants."

The North West Company Inc.
Gibraltar House, 77 Main Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba  Canada  R3C 2R1
T 204 934 1756   F 204 934 1317
Toll -free  1 800 563 0002
investorrelations@northwest.ca
www.northwest.ca