[LOGO]
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING,
PROXY STATEMENT AND 2021 ANNUAL REPORT
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
Corporate Profile
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc., headquartered in White Plains, New York, is the holding company for
Northeast Community Bank. Established in 1934, Northeast Community Bank is a community-oriented financial
institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in its market area. We conduct our
lending activities throughout New York, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. We attract deposits from the general
public and use those funds to originate multi-family and mixed-use construction loans, multi-family and mixed-
use permanent loans, commercial and industrial loans and limited consumer loans, which we hold for investment.
Transfer Agent
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
1 State Street, 30th Floor
New York, NY 10004
212-509-4000
www.continentalstock.com/shareholders
Stock Listing
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.’s
common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq (Nasdaq: NECB)
Locations
Corporate Headquarters and Main Office Annex
325 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, New York 10601
Bank Branches
325 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, New York 10601
590 East 187th Street
Bronx, New York 10458
242 West 23rd Street
New York, New York 10011
281 Quincy Avenue
Quincy, Massachusetts 02169
52 Bakertown Road,
Palm Tree, New York 10950
166 Route 59
Monsey, New York 10950
Loan Production Office
301 North Main Street, Suite 5
New City, New York 10956
55 Church Street
White Plains, New York 10601
1355 First Avenue
New York, New York 10021
72 West Eckerson Road
Spring Valley, New York 10977
87 Elm Street
Danvers, Massachusetts 01923
35 Edgell Road
Framingham, Massachusetts 01017
1 Freeland Street
Monroe, New York 10950
Coming Soon:
3 Winterton Road
Bloomingburg, New York 12721
Other Properties
830 Post Road East
Westport, Connecticut 06880
April 19, 2022
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of NorthEast Community
Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”). The Annual Meeting will be conducted solely online via live webcast
on Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., local time.
The notice of annual meeting and proxy statement appearing on the following pages describe the
formal business to be transacted at the meeting. Directors and officers of the Company, as well as a
representative of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C., the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, will
be present to respond to appropriate questions of stockholders.
It is important that your shares are represented at this meeting, whether or not you attend the
meeting in person and regardless of the number of shares you own. To make sure your shares are
represented, we urge you to vote online or via telephone or to complete and mail a proxy card. You can
revoke a proxy at any time before its exercise at the meeting by following the instructions in the proxy
statement.
Sincerely,
Kenneth A. Martinek
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
325 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, New York 10601
(914) 684-2500
NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TIME AND DATE
9:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday, May 26, 2022
PLACE
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
RECORD DATE
PROXY VOTING
The Annual Meeting will be conducted solely online via live webcast.
You will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online,
vote your shares electronically by entering the control number on your
proxy card, and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting:
https://www.cstproxy.com/necb/2022 at the date and time described in
the accompanying proxy statement. There is no physical location for
the Annual Meeting.
(1)
(2)
(3)
To elect three directors to serve for a term of three years;
To ratify the selection of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2022; and
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
To vote, you must have been a stockholder at the close of business on April
6, 2022.
It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting.
You can vote your shares online or via telephone or by completing and
returning a proxy card or voting instruction card. Voting instructions are
printed on the notice of internet availability of proxy materials sent to you
and are included in the accompanying proxy statement. You can revoke a
proxy at any time before its exercise at the meeting by following the
instructions in the proxy statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Anne Stevenson-DeBlasi
Corporate Secretary
White Plains, New York
April 19, 2022
Note: Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please vote online or via telephone or
by marking, signing, dating and promptly returning a proxy card.
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of
Directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) to be used at the annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company. The Company is the holding company for NorthEast Community Bank (the
“Bank”). The Annual Meeting will be conducted solely online via live webcast. You will be able to attend
and participate in the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically by entering the control number
the meeting by visiting:
submit your questions during
on your proxy
https://www.cstproxy.com/necb/2022 at the date and time described in the accompanying proxy statement.
There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting.
card,
and
This proxy statement and the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the year ended
December 31, 2021 are available online at www.proxyvote.com.
VOTING AND PROXY PROCEDURE
Who Can Vote at the Meeting
You are entitled to vote your shares of Company common stock if the records of the Company
show that you held your shares as of the close of business on April 6, 2022. If your shares are held in a
stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominees, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares
held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other
nominee. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote your shares.
Your broker, bank or other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction form for you to use in directing it on
how to vote your shares.
As of the close of business on April 6, 2022, 16,377,936 shares of Company common stock were
outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share of common stock has one vote. The Company’s articles of
incorporation generally provide that record holders of the Company’s common stock who beneficially own,
either directly or indirectly, in excess of 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares are not entitled to any
vote with respect to those shares held in excess of the 10% limit. However, a majority of the Company’s
disinterested directors may approve a stockholder acquiring and voting in excess of 10% of the Company’s
outstanding shares before the stockholder acquires any shares in excess of the 10% limit.
The Company and the Bank have entered into a written agreement with The Stilwell Group with
respect to the voting of their shares of Company common stock. For more information regarding this
agreement, see “Stockholder Agreement” below.
Advance Voting Methods
Even if you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, please vote in advance of the meeting using
any one of the following advance voting methods (see page 3 for additional details).
Visit the website listed on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote VIA THE
INTERNET;
1
Call the telephone number on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote BY
TELEPHONE; or
If you received a paper proxy card or voting instruction form, complete, sign, date and return
the proxy card or voting instruction form in the enclosed envelope BY MAIL.
Attending and Voting at the Meeting
You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast by visiting the Company’s
virtual meeting website at https://www.cstproxy.com/necb/2022 on Thursday, May 26, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.
Eastern time. Upon visiting the meeting website, you will be prompted to enter your 16-digit Control
Number provided to you on your proxy card. Your unique Control Number allows us to identify you as a
stockholder and will enable you to securely log on, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting
on the meeting website. Further instructions on how to attend and participate via the internet, including
how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are available at www.proxyvote.com.
Vote Required
The annual meeting will be held only if there is a quorum. A majority of the outstanding shares of
Company common stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum. If you
return valid proxy instructions or attend the meeting via live webcast, your shares will be counted for
purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you abstain from voting. Broker non-votes also
will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a
broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal
because the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that
item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.
In voting on the election of directors, you may vote in favor of the nominees or withhold votes as
to the nominees. There is no cumulative voting for the election of directors. Directors are elected by a
plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. “Plurality” means that the nominees receiving the largest
number of votes cast will be elected up to the maximum number of directors to be elected at the annual
meeting. The maximum number of directors to be elected at the annual meeting is four. In the election of
directors, votes that are withheld will have no effect on the outcome of the election.
In voting on the ratification of the appointment of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm, you may vote in favor of the proposal, vote against the
proposal, or abstain from voting. To be approved, this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast at the annual meeting. In counting votes on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-
votes will have no impact on the outcome of the proposal.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are not considered “votes cast” and will therefore have no
effect on the outcome of any vote taken at the annual meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker,
bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because
the broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and
has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes will be counted for
purposes of determining the existence of a quorum.
2
Effect of Not Casting Your Vote
If you hold your shares in street name it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in
the election of directors (Proposal 1).
Current regulations restrict the ability of your bank or broker to vote your uninstructed shares in
the election of directors and other matters on a discretionary basis. Thus, if you hold your shares in street
name and you do not instruct your bank or broker how to vote in the election of directors, no votes will be
cast on your behalf. These are referred to as broker non-votes. Your bank or broker will, however, continue
to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2). If you are a stockholder of record and you do
not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the annual meeting.
Voting by Proxy
This proxy statement is being sent to you by the Board of Directors of the Company to request that
you allow your shares of the Company common stock to be represented at the annual meeting by the persons
named in the enclosed proxy card. All shares of Company common stock represented at the meeting by
properly executed and dated proxies will be voted according to the instructions indicated on the proxy card.
If you vote online or by telephone, or if you sign, date, and return a proxy card without giving voting
instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
“FOR” each of the nominees for director; and
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
If any matter not described in this proxy statement is properly presented at the annual meeting, the
persons named in the proxy card will use their judgment to determine how to vote your shares. This includes
a motion to adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit additional proxies. If the annual meeting is postponed
or adjourned, your shares of Company common stock may also be voted by the persons named in the proxy
card on the new meeting date, unless you have revoked your proxy. The Company does not know of any
other matters to be presented at the annual meeting.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the annual meeting. To revoke
your proxy, you must either advise the Corporate Secretary of the Company in writing before your
Company common stock has been voted at the annual meeting, deliver a later-dated valid proxy or attend
the meeting and vote your shares online. In addition, if you voted by telephone or via the Internet, you may
revoke your vote by following the instructions provided for each. Attendance at the virtual annual meeting
will not in itself constitute revocation of your proxy.
If your Company common stock is held in street name, you will receive instructions from your
broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow to have your shares voted. Your broker, bank or other
nominee may allow you to deliver your voting instructions by telephone or by the Internet. Please see the
instruction form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee that accompanies this proxy statement. If
you wish to change your voting instructions after you have returned your voting instruction form to your
broker, bank or other nominees, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee.
3
Participants in the Bank’s ESOP and 401(k) Plan
If you are a participant in the NorthEast Community Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the
“ESOP”) or hold shares of Company common stock through the NorthEast Community Bank 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), you will receive a voting instruction form from each plan that
reflects all shares you may vote under these plans.
All shares held by the ESOP are voted by the ESOP trustees, but each participant in the ESOP may
direct the trustees on how to vote the shares of Company common stock allocated to his or her account.
Unallocated shares and allocated shares for which no timely voting instructions are received will be voted
by the ESOP trustees as directed by the ESOP Committee consisting of all of the outside directors of the
Board of Directors of the Company.
Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, you are entitled to direct the trustee how to vote the shares of
Company common stock credited to your account in the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan trustee will vote all
shares for which it does not receive timely instructions from participants in the same proportion on each of
the proposals as the shares held by participants in the 401(k) Plan voted for and against (or withheld) on
each proposal for which voting instructions were timely received.
The deadline for returning your voting instruction forms to the trustees of the ESOP and 401(k)
Plan is May 19, 2022.
General
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company periodically reviews its corporate governance policies and procedures to ensure that
the Company meets the highest standards of ethical conduct, reports results with accuracy and transparency
and maintains full compliance with the laws, rules and regulations that govern the Company’s operations.
As part of this periodic corporate governance review, the Board of Directors reviews and adopts best
corporate governance policies and practices for the Company.
Corporate Governance Policies and Procedures
The Company has adopted a corporate governance policy to govern certain of its activities
including, but not limited to: (1) the duties and responsibilities of each director; (2) the composition, duties
and responsibilities and operation of the Board of Directors; (3) the selection of the Company’s Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer; (4) the establishment and operation of Board committees; (5) succession
planning; (6) convening executive sessions of independent directors; (7) the Board of Directors’ interaction
with management and third parties; (8) the distribution of Board materials in advance of meetings; (9) the
review of director compensation; (10) the evaluation of the performance of the Board of Directors and of
the Chief Executive Officer; and (11) the orientation of new directors and continuing education.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that is designed to ensure that
the Company’s directors, executive officers, and employees meet the highest standards of ethical conduct.
The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers, and
employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business
in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise act with integrity and in the Company’s best interests. Under
the terms of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, directors, executive officers, and employees are
4
required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the
Code.
As a mechanism to encourage compliance with the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the
Company has established procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints received regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters. These procedures ensure that individuals may submit
concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters in a confidential and anonymous manner.
The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct also prohibits the Company from retaliating against any director,
executive officer or employee who reports actual or apparent violations of the Code.
Board Leadership Structure
Currently, Kenneth A. Martinek serves as our Chairman of the Board and as our Chief Executive
Officer. Our board of directors believes that potential efficiencies result from having the Chief Executive
Officer also serve in the role of Chairman of the Board, as the director most familiar with our current
business operations and industry, is therefore best able to identify the strategic priorities to be discussed by
the board of directors. The Chairman of the Board has no greater nor lesser vote on matters considered by
the board than any other director, and the Chairman does not vote on any related party transaction. All of
our directors, including the Chairman, are bound by fiduciary obligations, imposed by law, to serve in the
best interests of the stockholders.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
A fundamental part of our risk management is not only understanding the risks we face and what
steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate
for us. The full board of directors’ involvement in helping to set our business strategy is an important aspect
of its assessment of management’s tolerance for risk and its determination of the appropriate level of risk
for us. While the board of directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management
process, various committees of the board also have responsibility for risk management. In particular, the
Audit Committee focuses on financial risk by providing oversight of the quality and integrity of our
financial reporting and internal controls, as well as our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
Our Compensation Committee reviews our compensation policies and practices to help ensure there is a
direct relationship between pay levels and corporate performance and return to stockholders. The
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors oversees risks associated with the
independence of our Board of Directors and potential conflicts of interest and also is responsible for review
and oversight of our environmental, social and governance policies and activities.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bank conduct business through
meetings of their boards of directors and their committees. NorthEast Community Bancorp’s board of
directors held 5 regular meetings and one special meeting during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021,
and NorthEast Community Bank’s board of directors held 13 regular meetings and one special meeting
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. No director attended fewer than 100% of the total
meetings of the board of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp and the committees on which such
director served during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
The following table identifies our standing committees and their members as of April 6, 2022. All
members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee are independent
in accordance with the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market and the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
5
Director
Diane B. Cavanaugh
Charles M. Cirillo
Eugene M. Magier
John F. McKenzie
Kevin P. O’Malley
Kenneth H. Thomas
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2021
* Denotes Chair of Committee
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
X*
X*
X
X
6
X
X
3
Nominating/
Corporate
Governance
Committee
X
X
X*
1
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in discharging its duties
related to the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance, the performance of our internal
audit function, our accounting and financial reporting process and financial statement audits. The Audit
Committee meets periodically with our independent registered public accounting firm and management to
review accounting, auditing, internal control structure and financial reporting matters.
The board of directors has determined that Charles M. Cirillo is an “audit committee financial
expert,” as such term is defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Mr. Cirillo is independent under the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Audit Committee
acts under a written charter, a copy of which is available on NorthEast Community Bancorp’s website
(www.necb.com).
The report of the Audit Committee appears in this proxy statement under the heading “Proposal 2
—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Audit Committee Report.”
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee approves our compensation objectives
and establishes the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executives. Our Chief
Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee from time to time regarding
the appropriate mix and level of compensation for other executives. Those recommendations consider the
objectives of our compensation philosophy and the range of compensation programs authorized by the
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews all compensation components for our
Chief Executive Officer and other highly compensated executive officers’ compensation including base
salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and other perquisites. In addition to reviewing competitive
market values, the Compensation Committee also examines the total compensation mix, pay-for-
performance relationship, and how all elements, in the aggregate, comprise the executive’s total
compensation package. Decisions by the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of
executive officers are approved by the full board of directors. The Compensation Committee also assists
the board of directors in evaluating potential candidates for executive positions.
The Compensation Committee acts under a written charter, a copy of which is available on
NorthEast Community Bancorp’s website (www.necb.com).
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee is responsible for the annual selection of the board of directors’ nominees for election as
directors and developing and implementing policies and practices relating to corporate governance,
including implementation of and monitoring adherence to NorthEast Community Bancorp’s corporate
governance policy, and reviewing the Company’s strategies and polices regarding environmental, social
6
and governance matters. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also considers and
recommends the nominees for director to stand for election at our annual meeting of stockholders. When
identifying nominees to serve as director, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee seeks to create
a board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect
to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business
judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. The Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee acts under a written charter, a copy of which is available on NorthEast Community Bancorp’s
website (www.necb.com).
Minimum Qualifications. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a
set of criteria that it considers when it selects individuals to be nominated for election to the Board of
Directors. First, a candidate must meet the eligibility requirements set forth in the Company’s Bylaws,
which include an age limitation, a stock ownership requirement and a requirement that the candidate not
have been subject to certain criminal or regulatory actions. A candidate also must meet any qualification
requirements set forth in any Board or committee governing documents.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the following criteria in
selecting nominees: contributions to the range of talent, skill and expertise appropriate for the Board;
financial, regulatory and business experience; knowledge of the banking and financial services industries;
familiarity with the operations of public companies and ability to read and understand financial statements;
familiarity with the Company’s market area and participation in and ties to local businesses and local civic,
charitable and religious organizations; personal and professional integrity, honesty and reputation; ability
to represent the best interests of the stockholders of the Company and the best interests of the Bank; ability
to devote sufficient time and energy to the performance of his or her duties; independence; current equity
holdings in the Company; and any other factors the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
deems relevant, including age, diversity, size of the Board of Directors and regulatory disclosure
obligations. In its consideration of diversity, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks
to create a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge and that has a diverse set of skills and experience
with respect to management and leadership, vision and strategy, accounting and finance, business
operations and judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance.
In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of Directors, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider and review an existing director’s Board
and committee attendance and performance; length of Board service; experience, skills and contributions
that the existing director brings to the Board; and independence.
Director Nomination Process. The process that the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee follows when it identifies and evaluates individuals to be nominated for election to the Board
of Directors is as follows:
For purposes of identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee relies on personal contacts of the committee members and other members of the
Board of Directors, as well as their knowledge of members of the communities served by the Bank. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also will consider director candidates recommended by
stockholders in accordance with the policy and procedures set forth below. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee has not previously used an independent search firm to identify nominees.
In evaluating potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
determines whether the candidate is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of Directors by
evaluating the candidate under the selection criteria set forth above. In addition, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee will conduct a check of the individual’s background and interview the
7
candidate to further assess the qualities of the prospective nominees and the contributions he or she would
make to the Board.
Consideration of Recommendations by Stockholders. It is the policy of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee to consider director candidates recommended by stockholders who
appear to be qualified to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on
the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not perceive a need
to increase the size of the Board of Directors. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee’s resources, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below.
Procedures to be Followed by Stockholders. To submit a recommendation for a director candidate
to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a stockholder should submit the following
information in writing, addressed to the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, care of the Corporate Secretary, at the main office of the Company:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The name of the person recommended as a director candidate;
All information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of
proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended;
The written consent of the person being recommended as a director candidate to being
named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected;
As to the stockholder making the recommendation, the name and address, as they appear
on the Company’s books, of such stockholder; provided, however, that if the stockholder
is not a registered holder of the Company’s common stock, the stockholder should submit
his or her name and address along with a current written statement from the record holder
of the shares that reflects ownership of the Company’s common stock; and
5.
A statement disclosing whether such stockholder is acting with or on behalf of any other
person and, if applicable, the identity of such person.
In order for a director candidate to be considered for nomination at the Company’s annual meeting
of stockholders, the recommendation must be received by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee at least 120 calendar days prior to the date the Company’s proxy statement was released to
stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting, advanced by one year.
Attendance at the Annual Meeting
The Board of Directors encourages directors to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All
directors serving on the Board of Directors at the time of the annual meeting attended the virtual annual
meeting of stockholders of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., the predecessor company of the Company,
in 2021.
8
PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The board of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp is presently composed of nine members,
all of whom are independent under the current listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, except for
Kenneth A. Martinek, who is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank;
Jose Collazo, the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and the Bank; and Charles
Martinek, Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Bank.
In determining the independence of its directors, the Board reviews and considers transactions,
relationships or arrangements between the Company, the Bank and its directors, including those reported
under “Transactions with Related Persons” as well as those that are not required to be disclosed in this
proxy statement under that heading. The purpose of the review is to determine whether any such or
transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent. As part of its review
of director independence, the Board reviewed the purchase of securities by NorthEast Community Bank in
The Community Development Fund (“CDF”), a registered bond fund which is managed by Community
Development Fund Advisors, LLC, an entity for which Kenneth H. Thomas serves as Chief Executive
Officer, as well as considered the services provided by Mr. Thomas’ company, K. H. Thomas Associates,
LLC, to NorthEast Community Bank relating to branching and Community Reinvestment Act matters.
Investment in the CDF enables NorthEast Community Bank to satisfy its Community Reinvestment Act
lending obligations in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts through investment in securities where the
underlying loans are low- to moderate – income loans in areas surrounding the Bank’s Massachusetts office
locations, which loans are selected by an independent sub-advisor to the CDF. As a result of its review of
any of relationships, arrangements, or transactions with directors of the Company, the Board affirmatively
determined that all of the Company’s directors are independent, except for Mr. Kenneth Martinek, Mr.
Collazo and Mr. Charles Martinek, as is noted above.
The board of directors is divided into three classes, each with three-year staggered terms, with
approximately one-third of the directors elected each year. At the annual meeting, stockholders will elect
three directors to each serve a term of three years. The nominees for election to serve a three-year term are
Charles M. Cirillo, Eugene M. Magier and Kenneth A. Martinek. Each of the nominees is a current director
of NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bank.
Unless you indicate on your proxy card that your shares should not be voted for certain directors,
the board of directors intends that the proxies solicited by it will be voted for the election of all of the
board’s nominees. If any nominee is unable to serve, the persons named in the proxy card will vote your
shares to approve the election of any substitute proposed by the board of directors. Alternatively, the board
of directors may adopt a resolution to reduce the size of the board. At this time, the board of directors
knows of no reason why any nominee might be unable to serve.
Board Diversity. Our Board values diversity and seeks to include directors with a broad range of
backgrounds, professional experience, perspectives, and skills. In compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules,
the following chart shows the diversity of the Board:
Board Diversity Matrix (as of April 6, 2022)
Total Number of Directors
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors
Part II: Demographic Background
Hispanic or Latinx
White
Female
Male
9
1
1
9
8
1
7
The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of all nominees.
Information regarding the nominees and the directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp continuing
in office is provided below. Unless otherwise stated, each individual has held his or her current occupation
for the last five years. The age indicated for each individual is as of December 31, 2021 and the indicated
period of service as a director includes service as a director of NorthEast Community Bank. Based on their
respective experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills set forth below, the board of directors
determined that each current director and nominee should serve as a director.
Nominees for Election of Directors:
Nominees for a Three-Year Term:
Charles M. Cirillo is a certified public accountant and is a partner in the accounting firm Cirillo &
Cirillo, Certified Public Accountants PLLC. Age 56. Director since 2018.
Mr. Cirillo’s accounting and business experience provides the board of directors with valuable
insight and expertise with regard to various financial and accounting matters affecting us.
Eugene M. Magier is an attorney and has been President of the Law Offices of Eugene M. Magier,
P.C. since 1994. Mr. Magier is a licensed Massachusetts Real Estate Broker and has managed residential
and commercial real estate. Prior to starting his own law firm, Mr. Magier served as Legal Counsel for
CVS Corporation. Age 60. Director since 2012.
Mr. Magier’s experience and background as an attorney specializing in commercial real estate,
acquisitions, workouts and contracts provides the board with valuable knowledge and expertise directly
related to the segments of the lending business in which we operate
Kenneth A. Martinek has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
NorthEast Community Bancorp since its formation in 2006 and previously also served as President of the
Company from 2006 until January 2013. He has served with NorthEast Community Bank since 1976 and
has been the Chief Executive Officer of NorthEast Community Bank since 1991 and was the President of
the Bank from 1991 until January 2013. Mr. Martinek was first elected as a director of NorthEast
Community Bank in 1983 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in 2002. Mr. Martinek’s brother,
Charles A. Martinek, also serves on the board of directors. Age 69.
Since becoming Chief Executive Officer of NorthEast Community Bank in 1991, Mr. Martinek has
successfully completed the Company’s minority stock offering in 2006 and the Company’s 2021 second
step conversion and public offering, in both cases navigating the issues facing a public company in the
banking sector. Mr. Martinek’s knowledge of all aspects of the business of the Company and the Bank and
its history, combined with his success and strategic vision, position him well to continue to serve as our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Directors Continuing in Office:
The following directors have terms ending in 2023:
Jose M. Collazo has served as President of NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast
Community Bank since January 2013 and Chief Operating Officer of NorthEast Community Bancorp and
NorthEast Community Bank since February 2012. Mr. Collazo served as Senior Vice President and Chief
10
Information Officer from 2002 until February 2012. Mr. Collazo joined NorthEast Community Bank in
January 1986. Age 55. Director since 2013.
Mr. Collazo’s extensive knowledge of NorthEast Community Bank’s and NorthEast Community
Bancorp’s business and history, combined with his strategic vision, position him well to continue to serve
as our director, President and Chief Operating Officer.
John F. McKenzie is a retired insurance executive. Prior to his retirement in early 2008,
Mr. McKenzie was the owner of an insurance agency in Orange, Connecticut, providing multiline personal
and commercial insurance products. Age 78. Director since November 2006.
Mr. McKenzie provides the board with significant management, strategic and operational
knowledge through his previous experience as owner of an insurance agency.
Kevin P. O’Malley is an attorney and is president of the Kevin P. O’Malley, P.C., a law firm located
in Tappan, New York. Age 76. Director since 2016.
Mr. O’Malley is a critical member of the board of directors and has knowledge and expertise in
construction financing, which is our primary lending focus. As a practicing attorney, Mr. O’Malley also
provides knowledge and expertise directly related to the high absorption, homogenous communities in
which we operate.
The following directors have terms ending in 2024:
Diane B. Cavanaugh has served as a Principal Appellate Court Attorney for the First Judicial
Department of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court since February 2019. Ms.
Cavanaugh was an attorney with Lyons McGovern, LLP from January 2010 to January 2019. Age 65.
Director since 1992.
Ms. Cavanaugh’s years of practicing law in the New York area enable her to provide the board
with the legal knowledge necessary to assess issues facing the Company and the Bank effectively.
Charles A. Martinek has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of
NorthEast Community Bank since September 2013. Prior to that time, Mr. Martinek served as Internal
Loan Review and Community Reinvestment Officer of NorthEast Community Bank since May 2007,
commercial loan officer with NorthEast Community Bank since 2001, and as an assistant vice president
since 2002. Before serving with NorthEast Community Bank, Mr. Martinek was a quality control analyst
with C. Cowles & Co. Mr. Martinek is also the owner of Martinek Investment Properties, LLC. Mr.
Martinek’s brother, Kenneth Martinek, also serves on the Board of Directors. Age 60. Director since 2002.
Mr. Martinek’s commercial loan and compliance experience is crucial to the ability of the board of
directors to comprehend and understand the complex compliance issues in the banking industry.
Kenneth H. Thomas has been an independent bank analyst and consultant since 1969 and has
been President of K. H. Thomas Associates, LLC since 1975. Dr. Thomas is also a registered investment
advisor and Chief Executive Officer of Community Development Fund Advisors, LLC. Dr. Thomas holds
a Ph.D. in Finance from the Wharton School and has written extensively on the Community Reinvestment
Act of 1977. Age 74. Director since 2001.
11
As an independent bank analyst for more than 40 years, Dr. Thomas offers the board essential
industry experience and knowledge, particularly with respect to branching and Community Reinvestment
matters.
PROPOSAL 2 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. to be the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022,
subject to ratification by stockholders. A representative of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. is expected to be present
at the annual meeting to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders and will have the opportunity
to make a statement should he or she desire to do so.
If the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is not
approved by a majority of the votes cast at the annual meeting, the Audit Committee will consider other
independent registered public accounting firms. In addition, if the ratification of the independent registered
public accounting firm is approved by stockholders at the annual meeting, the Audit Committee may also
consider other independent registered public accounting firms in the future if it determines that such
consideration is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of S.R.
Snodgrass as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ending December
31, 2021 and 2020 for services provided by S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. and BDO USA LP, respectively.
Audit Fees (1) .................................................................
Audit-Related Fees (2) ....................................................
Tax Fees (3) ....................................................................
All Other Fees .................................................................
_________________________
(1)
2021
$199,772
199,978
35,094
154,314
2020
$174,319
--
23,539
--
Includes audit fees for professional service rendered for the audit of the Company’s financial
statements and review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports.
Includes audit-related fees associated with the Company’s second step conversion offering, which
was completed in July 2021.
Includes tax service fees related to tax compliance for the preparation of original tax returns.
(2)
(3)
Pre-Approval of Services by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work
of the independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee
approves, in advance, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent
registered public accounting firm. Such approval process ensures that the independent registered public
accounting firm does not provide any non-audit services to the Company that are prohibited by law or
regulation.
In addition, the Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all audit and
permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Requests
for services by the independent registered public accounting firm for compliance with the auditor services
12
policy must be specific as to the services to be provided. The request may be made with respect to either
specific services or a type of service for predictable or recurring services.
Any proposed specific engagement may be presented to the Audit Committee for consideration at
its next regular meeting or, if earlier consideration is required, to the Audit Committee or one or more of
its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any specific
approval of services at the next regular meeting of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will
regularly review summary reports detailing all services being provided to the Company by its independent
registered public accounting firm.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, all services were approved, in advance, by the Audit
Committee in compliance with these procedures.
Audit Committee Report
The Company’s management is responsible for the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent
audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and issuing an opinion on the conformity of those
financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee oversees the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting on behalf of the Board of Directors.
In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the
independent registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the
Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial
statements with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required by generally
accepted accounting standards.
In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the
independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting
firm the accounting firm’s independence from the Company and its management. In concluding that the
accounting firm is independent, the Audit Committee considered, among other factors, whether the non-
audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm were compatible with their
independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
the overall scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered
public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination,
their evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the
Company’s financial reporting process.
In performing all these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity. In its
oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management,
which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of the independent registered
public accounting firm who, in its report, expresses an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s
financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee’s oversight does
not provide it with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate
accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures
designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations.
13
Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm do not assure that the Company’s financial statements are presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, that the audit of the Company’s consolidated
financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board or that the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in fact
“independent.”
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements
be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 for
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has appointed, subject to
stockholder ratification, the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Charles M. Cirillo
Eugene M. Magier
John F. McKenzie
14
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following information is furnished for all individuals serving as the principal executive officer
of NorthEast Community Bancorp for the most recently completed fiscal year and our next two most highly
compensated executive officers whose total compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021 exceeded
$100,000.
Name and
Principal Position
Kenneth A. Martinek .................................
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Jose M. Collazo........................................
President and Chief Operating Officer
Donald S. Hom ..........................................
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Year
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(1)
505,000 158,000
400,400 166,500
325,000 128,000
312,000 135,000
275,000 104,000
245,000 109,600
Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
All Other
Compen-
sation
($)(2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
112,209
21,590
84,026
32,419
78,376
17,371
Total
($)
775,210
588,490
537,776
479,419
459,776
371,971
(1) Represents a discretionary bonus based on past practices and the financial performance of NorthEast Community Bank during each of the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. For the 2022 fiscal year, the Company has implemented a performance based sh ort
term incentive plan for the named executive officers.
(2) Details of the amounts reported in “All Other Compensation” or fiscal 2021 are provided in the table below. All perquisites, which,
in the aggregate, were less than $10,000 for an individual were excluded from “All Other Compensation.”
Unused Vacation Pay
Employee stock ownership plan allocations
Automobile Allowance
Life Insurance (Imputed Income)
Mr. Martinek
—
106,269
—
5,940
Mr. Collazo
Mr. Hom
—
71,146
12,000
880
16,019
54,557
7,800
—
Annual Incentives. During 2021, the Bank awarded discretionary bonuses to the named executive
officers at levels consistent with past practice over the prior three fiscal years and in accordance with the
financial performance of Northeast Community Bank.
Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers. In 2021, we entered into employment
agreements with Messrs. Martinek and Collazo that replace their prior employments agreement in their
entirety. The employment agreements provide for a 36-month term. The term of the employment
agreements will extend for an additional 12 months on each anniversary of the effective date of the
agreements, unless the boards of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., NorthEast Community
Bank or Messrs. Martinek or Collazo, respectively, decide not to extend the term. Current base salaries
under the employment agreements for Messrs. Martinek and Collazo are $525,000 and $400,000,
respectively. The Compensation Committee of the NorthEast Community Bank board of directors annually
reviews the executives’ base salaries. In addition to base salary, the agreements provide that the executives
will be eligible to participate in short-term and long-term incentive compensation, determined and payable
at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the NorthEast Community Bank board of directors.
The executives will also be entitled to continue participation in any fringe benefit arrangements in which
he was participating on the effective date of the employment agreement. In addition, the agreements
15
provide for reimbursement of reasonable travel and other business expenses incurred in connection with
the performance of the executive’s duties.
If the executive’s employment is terminated by NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast
Community Bank during the term of the agreement, without cause, including a resignation for good reason
(as defined in the agreement), but excluding termination for cause or due to death, disability, retirement or
following a change in control, the executive would be entitled to a payment equal to a three times the sum
of: (i) his annual base salary plus (ii) his target annual bonus in effect on the termination date. The
severance payment will be paid to the executive as salary continuation in substantially equal installments
over the 36-month period in accordance with NorthEast Community Bank’s customary payroll practices,
subject to the receipt of a signed release of claims from the executive within the time frame set forth in the
agreement. Assuming the executives elect continued medical and dental coverage under COBRA,
NorthEast Community Bank will reimburse the executives in an after-tax amount equal to the monthly
COBRA premium paid by the executive for such coverage, less the active employee premium for such
coverage. Each executive will be eligible to receive said reimbursement for the earlier of: the date the
executive is no longer eligible for COBRA, the period of time used to calculate the severance payments, or
the date in which the executive becomes eligible to receive substantially similar coverage from another
employer. In addition, each executive would receive any unpaid annual bonus for the completed fiscal year
and, to the extent there are any outstanding equity plan awards made to the executives, the treatment of
such awards upon termination would be determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable equity
plan and award agreements.
If the executive’s employment is terminated during the term of the agreement by NorthEast
Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast Community Bank without cause, including a resignation for good
reason (as defined in the agreements), within 24 months after a change in control (as also defined in the
agreements), each executive would be entitled to a payment equal to a multiple of three times of the sum
of: (i) his annual base salary (or his base salary in effect immediately before the change in control, if higher)
plus (ii) his annual target bonus (or his target bonus in effect immediately before the change in control, if
higher). The severance payment will be paid to the executive within 60 days of the termination date in a
single lump sum payment. The payment will also include a sum equal to three times his prior year bonus
in a lump sum on the date on which the bonus would have been paid to executive but for executive’s
termination of employment. In addition, each executive will receive a lump sum payment equal to the cost
of providing continued medical and dental coverage for 36 months following termination less the active
employee charge for such coverage in effect on the termination date. Further, to the extent there are any
outstanding equity plan awards made to executives, the treatment of such awards upon termination would
be determined in accordance with the terms of the applicable equity plan and award agreements.
For purposes of the executive’s ability to resign and receive a payment under the agreement, “good
reason” would include the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) a material reduction in the
executive’s base salary, except for reductions proportionate with similar reductions to all other employees;
(ii) a material adverse change in executive’s position that results in a demotion in the executive’s status
within NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast Community Bank; (iii) a change in the primary
location at which the executive is required to perform the duties of his employment with NorthEast
Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast Community Bank to a location that is more than 30 miles from
the location of NorthEast Community Bank’s headquarters as of the date of the agreement; or (iv) a material
breach by NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast Community Bank of any written agreement
between the executive, on the one hand, and any of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and NorthEast
Community Bank or any other affiliate of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., on the other hand, unless
arising from the executive’s inability to materially perform his duties contemplated hereunder.
16
The employment agreements provide for a “best net benefits” approach in the event that severance
benefits under the agreements or otherwise result in “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The best net benefits approach reduces an executive’s
payments and benefits to avoid triggering the excise tax if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax
amount to the executive officer compared to the amount the executive officer would receive net of the
excise tax if no reduction were made.
Under the employment agreements, if the executive is terminated due to disability, the employment
agreement will terminate and the executive will receive an amount equal to one times the sum of his base
salary and target bonus in effect on the termination date less the amount expected to be paid to executive
under the NorthEast Community Bank long-term disability plan, payable as salary continuation in
substantially equal installments over a twelve-month period. For these purposes, disability will occur on
the date on which the insurer or administrator of NorthEast Community Bank’s long-term disability
insurance determines that executive is eligible to commence benefits under such insurance. If the executive
dies while employed, the employers will pay to his designated beneficiary an amount equal to one times
the sum of the executive’s base salary and target bonus in effect on the termination date.
Upon retirement of an executive, the executive will be entitled to benefits under any retirement
plans to which he is a party but shall not be entitled to any amount or benefits under the employment
agreement.
The employment agreements provide that, except in the event of a change in control or involuntary
termination of employment for reasons other than cause, the executives are each subject to a one-year non-
compete in the event their employment is terminated. The employment agreements further require that the
executives not solicit business, customers or employees of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and
NorthEast Community Bank for a 12-month period following termination (other than a termination of
employment following a change in control) and require the executives to maintain confidential information.
NorthEast Community Bank will pay or reimburse the executives for all reasonable costs and legal
fees paid or incurred by the executives in any dispute or question of interpretation relating to the
employment agreement if the executive is successful on the merits in a legal judgment, arbitration or
settlement. The employment agreements also provide that NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. and
NorthEast Community Bank will indemnify the executives to the fullest extent legally allowable.
To the extent that a payment is made, or a benefit is received from NorthEast Community Bank,
the same payment or benefit will not be paid or received from NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Change in Control Agreements
NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bank have entered into change in
control agreements with Donald S. Hom and certain other key executives. Mr. Hom’s change in control
agreement has a two-year term, subject to renewal by the board of directors for an additional year beyond
the then current expiration date. If, within twenty-four months following a change in control of NorthEast
Community Bank or NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., either party or their successors terminates Mr.
Hom’s employment for reasons other than for cause, or if Mr. Hom voluntarily resigns upon the occurrence
of circumstances specified in the agreement, Mr. Hom will receive a severance payment under the
agreement. Mr. Hom’s severance benefit under his change in control agreement will be equal to two times
the sum of his base salary and most recent bonus earned at the time of his termination of employment. In
addition to the cash severance payment, Mr. Hom would be reimbursed for the amount equal to the monthly
COBRA premium paid by him for such coverage less the active employee premium for such coverage. The
17
change in control agreement limits payments made to Mr. Hom in connection with a change in control to
amounts that will not exceed the limits imposed by Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
Retirement Benefits
NorthEast Community Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The ESOP is a tax-qualified
defined contribution plan for all employees of NorthEast Community Bank who are 18 years of age or older
and have completed one year of service with NorthEast Community Bank. Eligible employees can begin
participation in the ESOP on the entry date (January 1 or July 1) that coincides or immediately follows their
satisfaction of the ESOP eligibility requirements. All named executive officers participate in the ESOP.
In 2006, in connection with the Company’s public minority stock offering, the ESOP borrowed
funds from NorthEast Community Bancorp pursuant to a loan and used those funds to purchase 518,420
shares of common stock for the ESOP in connection with the offering (the “2006 ESOP Loan”), which has
an interest rate of 8.25%, a term that ends in 2025 and which had a balance of $1.7 million at December
31, 2021. In connection with the completion of the second-step conversion offering on July 12, 2021, the
ESOP purchased an additional 782,726 shares of NorthEast Community Bancorp’s common stock. The
ESOP funded its purchase with a loan from the Company in the amount of $7.8 million (“2021 ESOP
Loan”). The loan will be repaid principally through NorthEast Community Bank’s contribution to the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan and dividends payable on common stock held by the Employee Stock
Ownership Plan over the 15-year term of the loan. The interest rate for the 2021 ESOP loan is 3.25% and
the balance of that loan was $7.3 million at December 31, 2021. All shares of the Company’s common
stock held by the ESOP prior to the completion of the second step offering and conversion on July 12, 2021
were automatically converted to shares of NorthEast Community Bancorp common stock pursuant to the
exchange ratio of 1.3400.
All shares purchased by the trustees on behalf of ESOP will be held in a loan suspense account.
Shares will be released from the loan suspense account on a pro rata basis, as NorthEast Community Bank
will make contributions to the ESOP sufficient to repay principal and interest on the loan. As shares are
released from the loan suspense account, they will be allocated among participants on the basis of each
participant’s proportional share of compensation. Participants vest ratably in their ESOP benefits over a
six-year period. Participants also become fully vested in their account balances upon normal retirement,
death or disability, a change in control, or the termination of the plan. Participants may generally receive
distributions from the plan upon separation from service. Any unvested shares forfeited upon a participant’s
termination of employment will be reallocated among the remaining participants, in accordance with the
terms of the plan.
The ESOP permits a participant to direct the trustee as to how to vote the shares of common stock
allocated to his or her account. The trustee votes unallocated shares and allocated shares for which
participants do not provide instructions on any matter in the same ratio as those shares for which participants
provide instructions, subject to fulfillment of the trustee’s fiduciary responsibilities.
Under applicable accounting requirements, NorthEast Community Bank will record compensation
expense for the ESOP at the fair market value of the shares as they are committed to be released from the
unallocated suspense account to each participant’s account. The compensation expense resulting from the
release of the common stock from the suspense account and allocation to plan participants will result in a
corresponding reduction in our earnings.
NorthEast Community Bank 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan
is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan for all employees of NorthEast Community Bank who are
18 years of age or older and completed one year of service with NorthEast Community Bank. All named
18
executive officers are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. Eligible employees may contribute to the
plan on a pre-tax basis, subject to limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. For 2021, the limit
is $19,500; provided, however, that participants over age 50 may contribute an additional $6,500 in “catch-
up” contributions to the plan. Under the plan, NorthEast Community Bank may make discretionary
matching contributions of 100% of the amount deferred, up to a maximum of 5% of each participant’s
compensation, to the accounts of all participants, as well as discretionary profit-sharing contributions to the
accounts of participants who are employed on the last day of the year and have completed at least 1,000
hours of service during the year. Northeast Community Bank provided no matching contributions in 2021.
Participants are always 100% percent vested in their salary deferrals; participants vest in NorthEast
Community Bank’s matching and profit-sharing contributions at the rate of 20% per year following
completion of their first year of service.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. NorthEast Community Bank maintains a supplemental
executive retirement plan that provides for the payment of supplemental retirement benefits to Kenneth
Martinek and Jose Collazo upon their termination of employment on or after the normal retirement age
of 65. The normal retirement benefit under the supplemental executive retirement plan equals 50% of the
executive’s average base salary over the three-year period preceding termination of employment. Upon
retirement on or after attaining age 60 and completing a minimum of 20 years of service, the executive is
eligible to receive an early retirement benefit equal to the normal retirement benefit, reduced by 0.25% for
each month by which the executive’s age at termination is less than age 65. No benefit is payable under
the supplemental executive retirement plan upon termination of employment prior to age 60, unless the
termination is due to death, disability, or a change in control, as discussed below. Upon early or normal
retirement, the executive receives the annual retirement benefit in equal monthly installments for the greater
of the executive’s lifetime or 15 years immediately following the participant’s normal or early retirement
or, in the case of disability, commencing at age 65. If a participant dies while receiving benefits under the
plan, the executive’s beneficiary continues to receive any remaining installment payments (up to 15)
due from the plan. If the executive dies while actively employed, his beneficiary receives an actuarially
equivalent lump sum calculated as if the executive had attained normal retirement age immediately prior to
death. If the executive has attained age 65 or is eligible for an early retirement benefit, he receives the
applicable benefit upon termination of employment due to disability. If the executive is not eligible for an
early or normal retirement benefit, the disability benefit under the plan is calculated as if the executive
attained normal retirement age immediately prior to termination of employment. Upon termination of
employment in connection with a change in control, the executive will receive a lump sum payment that is
actuarially equivalent to the normal retirement benefit, calculated as of the date of termination and without
regard to the participant’s age at termination. No benefits are payable under the supplemental executive
retirement plan upon a participant’s termination for cause (as defined in the plan).
19
Director Compensation
Name
Diane B. Cavanaugh
Charles M. Cirillo
Eugene M. Magier
John F. McKenzie
Kevin P. O’Malley
Kenneth H. Thomas
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
$ 54,400
73,900
53,400
54,400
48,400
52,400
Nonqualifed
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$ —
—
—
—
—
—
All Other
Compensation
$ —
—
—
—
—
—
Total
$54,400
73,900
53,400
54,400
48,400
52,400
Director Board Fees. Each director of NorthEast Community Bank also serves on the boards of
directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp and NorthEast Community Bancorp, MHC. Each non-
employee director of NorthEast Community Bank receives a $4,125 quarterly retainer plus $1,525 per
meeting attended. Non-employee directors also receive a $750 quarterly retainer plus $750 per meeting
attended for their service on the board of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, $500 per meeting
attended for service on the Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance and Director BSA
Committees of the board of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, and $1,000 per meeting attended
for service on the Audit Committee and the Strategic Planning Committee. In addition, the Chairperson of
the Audit Committee receives a $4,000 quarterly retainer and the Chairpersons of the Compensation and
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee each receive a $1,250 quarterly retainer. In 2022, NorthEast
Community Bank determined to discontinue the Director BSA Committee.
Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. NorthEast Community Bank has a deferred
compensation plan for directors of NorthEast Community Bank. Directors may elect on or before
December 31st each year to defer all or part of their fees earned during the following year into the plan.
NorthEast Community Bank credits fee deferrals with interest annually based on the prevailing rate on its
60-month certificate of deposit. Directors remain fully vested at all times in the fees deferred under the plan
and the interest credited on their deferrals. Distributions from the plan are made in cash and may commence
on a specified payment date or pursuant to a fixed payment schedule elected by the director. Generally,
directors may receive distributions from the deferred compensation plan only following their separation
from service, disability or death, upon a change in control, or upon the occurrence of an unforeseeable
emergency. Each participating director may designate a beneficiary to receive payment of any amounts
due from the plan upon the director’s death.
Outside Director Retirement Plan. NorthEast Community Bank maintains the NorthEast
Community Bank Outside Director Retirement Plan to provide non-employee directors with long standing
service with a supplemental retirement benefit. All current non-employee directors are participants in the
plan.
Participating directors are entitled to receive a retirement benefit calculated based on years of
service and director fees paid during the 12 completed calendar months preceding a director’s termination
of service multiplied by a vesting percentage. Participating directors with less than 10 years of service will
receive no benefit under the plan. Participating directors with 10 years but less than 15 years of service
will receive a benefit based on 50% of the total directors’ fees paid during the 12 completed calendar months
preceding the director’s termination. Participating directors with 15 years but less than 20 years will receive
75% of the total directors’ fees paid during the 12 completed calendar months preceding the director’s
termination. Participating directors with 20 or more years of service will receive a benefit calculated using
20
100% of the director fees paid during the 12 months preceding the directors termination. Participating
directors vest in their retirement benefit at a rate of 20% per year for years of service after January 1, 2006.
The annual director retirement benefit is generally paid monthly over a 120-month period following the
month in which a director terminates his service on the Board of Directors.
In the event a participating director dies while in pay status, the director’s beneficiary will receive
his or her remaining installments beginning in the month immediately following the director’s death. In
the event a participating director is terminated in connection with a change in control (as defined in the
plan), the director will receive a lump sum payment equal to the actuarial equivalent of the director’s
monthly benefit. In the event a participating director is removed from the board of directors for cause, the
director will forfeit all rights and benefits under the plan.
Stock-Based Deferral Plan. In 2021, the Company established a stock-based deferral plan for
certain eligible officers and directors. Under the terms of the stock-based deferral plan, participants were
permitted to make a one-time election to transfer all or a portion of their account balances from the director
plans into the stock-based deferral plan to purchase common stock in the Company’s second stop
conversion offering. The stock-based deferral plan also permitted eligible officers and members of the
board to make an election within 30 days of the effective date of the plan to defer future compensation into
the plan and invest the deferrals in NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. common stock.
STOCK OWNERSHIP
The following table provides information as of April 6, 2022 about the persons known to NorthEast
Community Bancorp to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding common stock. A
person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has,
directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power.
Name and Address
M3 Partners, LLC, M3 Partners, LP, and
M3F, Inc.; Jason Stock; and William Waller (2)
10 Exchange Place, Suite 510
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
NorthEast Community Bank Employee
Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
Number of
Shares Owned
Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding (1)
1,420,840
1,371,040
8.68
8.37
(1) Based on 16,377,936 shares of NorthEast Community Bancorp common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of April 6,
2022.
(2) Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by M3 Partners LLC with the SEC on February 14, 2022.
The following table provides information as of April 6, 2022 about the shares of NorthEast
Community Bancorp common stock that may be considered to be beneficially owned by each director and
executive officer of NorthEast Community Bancorp, and by all directors and executive officers of
NorthEast Community Bancorp as a group. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of
common stock over which he or she has directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power.
Unless otherwise indicated, none of the shares listed are pledged as security and each of the listed
individuals has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
21
The following table provides information as of April 6, 2022 about the shares of Company common
stock that may be considered to be beneficially owned by each director or nominee for director of the
Company, by those named executive officers of the Company listed in the Summary Compensation Table
and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. A person may be considered to
beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has directly or indirectly, sole or shared
voting or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated, none of the shares listed are pledged as security
and each of the listed individuals has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
As of April 6, 2022, none of our directors or executive officers beneficially owned more than 1% of the
Company’s outstanding shares of common stock and the number of shares beneficially owned by all
directors and executive officers as a group totaled 1.79% of our outstanding shares.
Name
Directors:
Diane B. Cavanaugh
Charles M. Cirillo
Jose M. Collazo
Eugene M. Magier
Charles A. Martinek
Kenneth A. Martinek
John F. McKenzie
Kevin P. O’Malley
Kenneth H. Thomas
Executive Officers Who are Not Directors:
Donald S. Hom
All directors and executive officers as a group (10) persons
(1) This column includes the following:
Number of
Shares Owned (1)
920
3,713
45,143(2)
14,060(3)
21,267
131,096(4)
17,150(5)
13,842(6)
25,000(7)
20,623
292,813
Name
Jose M. Collazo
Donald S. Hom
Charles A. Martinek
Kenneth A. Martinek
Shares Allocated
under the
NorthEast
Community Bank
ESOP
23,355
17,623
15,104
35,515
Shares Held in the
NorthEast
Community Bank
401(k) Retirement
Savings
Plan
3,181
—
6,021
65,151
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Includes 9,668 shares held by the ESOP of Mr. Collazo’s spouse and 5,870 shares held by the 401(k) Plan of Mr.
Collazo’s spouse.
Includes 3,546 shares held by Mr. Magier’s spouse.
Includes 10,430 shares held by the ESOP of Mr. Martinek’s spouse.
Includes 3,450 shares held by Mr. McKenzie’s spouse.
Includes 10,160 shares held by Mr. O’Malley’s Stock-Based Deferral Plan and 38 shares which were purchased by Mr.
O’Malley under a dividend reinvestment plan sponsored by a broker-dealer.
Includes 495 shares held by Mr. Thomas’ spouse.
22
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s executive officers
and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of any registered class of the Company’s equity
securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by regulation to
furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports. Based solely on its review of the copies of the reports it has
received, and written representations provided to the Company from the individuals required to file the
reports, the Company believes that each of its executive officers and directors has complied with applicable
reporting requirements for transactions in Company common stock during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2021, except for: (i) Mr. McKenzie who filed a Form 4 on July 14, 2021 which omitted a holding; and
(ii) Mr. O’Malley, whose initial Form 4 which was filed on July 14, 2021 inadvertently underreported the
number of shares held by him and who failed to file a Form 4 for the purchase of common stock on
November 8, 2021 made under a dividend reinvestment plan sponsored by a broker-dealer. An amended
Form 4/A was filed on January 19, 2022 by Mr. McKenzie, which corrected his prior Form 4. Mr. O’Malley
filed a late Form 4 on April 12, 2022 to report the purchases that were made under the broker-dealer
sponsored dividend reinvestment plan in November 2021 and on that same date filed an amended Form
4/A to correct his initial Form 4 filing.
Policies And Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions
OTHER INFORMATION
The Board has adopted a written policy and set of procedures for the review, approval or ratification
of transactions that could potentially be required to be reported under the SEC rules for disclosure of
transactions in which related persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the policy, related
persons consist of directors, director nominees, executive officers, persons, or entities known to us to be
the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any outstanding class of the voting securities of the
Company, or immediate family members or certain affiliated entities of any of the foregoing persons.
Transactions covered by the policy consist of any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship
or series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships, in which:
the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar
year;
the Company is, will, or may be expected to be a participant; and
any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
The policy excludes certain transactions, including:
any compensation paid to an executive officer of the Company if the Compensation
Committee of the Board approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such
compensation;
any compensation paid to a director of the Company if the Board or an authorized
committee of the Board approved such compensation; and
23
any transaction with a related person involving consumer and investor financial products
and services provided in the ordinary course of the Company’s business and on
substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable services
provided to unrelated third parties or to the Company’s employees on a broad basis (and,
in the case of loans, in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
Related person transactions will be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee. In determining
whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant
factors, including:
whether the terms of the proposed transaction are at least as favorable to the Company as
those that might be achieved with an unaffiliated third party;
the size of the transaction and the amount of consideration payable to the related person;
the nature of the interest of the related person;
whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and
whether the transaction involves the provision of goods and services to the Company that
are available from unaffiliated third parties.
A member of the Audit Committee who has an interest in the transaction will abstain from voting
on approval of the transaction, but may, if so requested by the chair of the Audit Committee, participate in
some or all of the discussion.
Transactions With Related Persons
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally prohibits loans by the Bank to its executive officers and
directors. However, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains a specific exemption from such prohibition for loans
by the Bank to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking regulations. Federal
regulations require that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors of insured
institutions must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. The Bank is therefore prohibited from
making any new loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors at different rates or terms
than those offered to the general public. Notwithstanding this rule, federal regulations permit the Bank to
make loans to executive officers and directors at reduced interest rates if the loan is made under a benefit
program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or
director over any other employee.
In accordance with banking regulations, the Board of Directors reviews all loans made to a director
or executive officer in an amount that, when aggregated with the amount of all other loans to such person
and his or her related interests, exceed the greater of $25,000 or 5% of the Company’s capital and surplus
(up to a maximum of $500,000) and such loan must be approved in advance by a majority of the
disinterested members of the Board of Directors. Additionally, pursuant to the Company’s Code of Ethics
and Business Conduct, all executive officers and directors of the Company must disclose any existing or
emerging conflicts of interest to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Such potential
conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the Company conducting business with
or competing against an organization in which a family member of an executive officer or director has an
24
ownership or employment interest; and (ii) the ownership of more than 1% of the outstanding securities (or
that represents more than 5% of the total assets of the employee and/or family member) of any business
entity that does business with or is in competition with the Company.
NorthEast Community Bank had no loans to related parties at December 31, 2021.
Other Transactions. Kevin P. O’Malley is an attorney with Kevin P. O’Malley, P.c., a law firm
that provides construction loan closing services to borrowers of NorthEast Community Bank who choose
to use his law firm for these services. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, construction loan
borrowers of NorthEast Community Bank paid $779,687 in legal fees to Mr. O’Malley’s law firm in
connection with the closing of construction loans. Mr. O’Malley’s law firm also provided legal services to
NorthEast Community Bank in 2021 for which his law firm received legal fees of $22,025.
Stockholder Agreement
On August 27, 2020, NorthEast Community Bancorp, NorthEast Community Bancorp, NorthEast
Community Bancorp, MHC and NorthEast Community Bank entered into a written agreement with Stilwell
Activist Fund, L.P., Stilwell Activist Investments, L.P., Stilwell Partners, L.P. and Joseph Stillwell
(collectively, “The Stilwell Group”).
Under the agreement, following completion of the second-step conversion through August 27, 2025
(the “effective period”), The Stilwell Group has agreed to vote all shares of NorthEast Community Bancorp,
Inc. beneficially owned by The Stilwell Group: (i) in favor of the nominees for election as directors of
NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. selected by the board of directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp,
Inc.; and (ii) in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors on all proposals at any
meeting of our stockholders, including in favor of any future stock incentive plan submitted to stockholders
for approval.
The stockholder agreement further provides that during the effective period, The Stilwell Group
may not, without our prior written consent, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any
block of shares of common stock of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. to any person that The Group
believes, after reasonable inquiry, would be the beneficial owns after such sale or transfer of more than
5.0% of the outstanding shares of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
During the effective period, The Stilwell Group has also agreed, among other things, not to: (i)
solicit proxies in opposition to any recommendation or proposals of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.’s
board of directors; (ii) initiate or solicit stockholders proposals or seek to place any representatives on
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors; (iii) nominate or encourage for the election as
director of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. any person who is not approved for nomination by the
board of directors of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.; (iv) vote for any nominee or nominees for
election to the board of directors of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. other than those nominated or
supported by Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors; (v) propose or seek to effect a
merger or sale of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. or NorthEast Community Bank; (vi) seek to exercise
any control or influence over the management of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. or NorthEast
Community Bank; or (vii) initiate or participate in any litigation against NorthEast Community Bancorp,
Inc. or NorthEast Community Bank.
The Stillwell Group previously reported to the Company that they held 976,886 shares of NorthEast
Community, Inc. common stock, which was converted into 1,309,027 shares of Company common stock
based on the 1.3400 exchange ratio for the Company’s second-step conversion offering that was completed
in July 2021. However, based on a review of Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G filings required to be made
25
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as of the April 6, 2022 record date, the Company
believes that The Stillwell Group currently beneficially owns less than 5% of the Company’s outstanding
shares of common stock.
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
The Company must receive proposals that stockholders seek to include in the proxy statement for
the Company’s next annual meeting no later than December 20, 2022. If next year’s annual meeting is held
on a date more than 30 calendar days from May 26, 2023, a stockholder proposal must be received by a
reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail its proxy solicitation for such annual meeting.
Any stockholder proposals will be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted by the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
NorthEast Community Bancorp’s Bylaws provide that a person may not be nominated for election
as a director of the Company unless that person is nominated by or at the direction of the Company’s Board
of Directors or by a stockholder who has given appropriate notice to the Company before the meeting.
Similarly, a stockholder may not bring business before an annual meeting unless the stockholder has given
the Company appropriate notice of their intention to bring that business before the meeting. The Company’s
secretary must receive notice of the nomination or proposal not less than 90 days before the annual meeting;
provided, however, that if less than 100 days’ notice of prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is
given or made to the stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received not later than
the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual
meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A stockholder who desires to raise new business
must provide certain information to the Company concerning the nature of the new business, the
stockholder, the stockholder’s ownership in the Company and the stockholder’s interest in the business
matter. Similarly, a stockholder wishing to nominate any person for election as a director must provide the
Company with certain information concerning the nominee and the proposing stockholder. A copy of the
Company’s Bylaws may be obtained from the Company.
Additionally, to comply with the universal proxy rules (once effective) for our 2023 annual meeting
of stockholders, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the
Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 no later than March 27, 2023.
Stockholder Communications
NorthEast Community Bancorp encourages stockholder communications to the board of directors
and/or individual directors. Stockholders who wish to communicate with the board of directors or an
individual director should send their communications to the care of Anne Stevenson-DeBlasi, Corporate
Secretary, 325 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York 10601. Communications regarding financial or
accounting policies should be sent to the attention of the Chairperson of the Audit Committee.
Miscellaneous
The Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders has been included with this proxy statement. Any
stockholder who has not received a copy of the Annual Report may obtain a copy by writing to the
Corporate Secretary of the Company. The Annual Report is not to be treated as part of the proxy solicitation
material or as having been incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
NorthEast Community Bancorp will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. NorthEast Community
Bancorp will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable
26
expenses incurred by them in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of NorthEast Community
Bancorp. Additionally, directors, officers and other employees of NorthEast Community Bancorp may
solicit proxies personally or by telephone. None of these persons will receive additional compensation for
these activities.
To further reduce costs, if you and others who share your address own your shares in “street name,”
your broker or other holder of record may be sending only one annual report and proxy statement to your
address. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs.
However, if a stockholder residing at such an address wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy
statement in the future, he or she should contact the broker or other holder of record. If you own your
shares in “street name” and are receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement, you can
request householding by contacting your broker or other holder of record.
27
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
☒
☐
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File Number: 001-40589
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
86-3173858
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No)
325 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
10601
(Zip Code)
(914) 684-2500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
Trading Symbol(s)
NECB
Name of exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files): ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of, “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Emerging growth company
Accelerated filer
Smaller Reporting Company
☐
☒
☒
☐
☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ Yes ☒ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
As of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there was no public market for the registrant’s common stock. The
registrant’s common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market on July 13, 2021.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 30, 2022 was 16,377,936.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K
Item Number
Page No.
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
PART I
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART II
Item 5
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[Reserved] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6
Item 7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . .
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . .
Item 9
Controls and Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A
Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9C
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
Item 15
Item 16
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART IV
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Signatures
1
20
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
52
52
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
54
55
56
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of
words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
statements of our beliefs, goals, intentions and expectations;
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are
subject to significant risks and uncertainties. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions
with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially
from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are worse than expected;
changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our interest margins, reduce the fair value of
financial instruments or reduce the demand for our loan products;
increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
changes in the quality and composition of our loan or investment portfolios;
changes in real estate market values in our market area;
a decrease in new construction in our primary market area;
decreased demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, or decreased demand for financial
services in our market area;
major catastrophes such as earthquakes, floods or other natural or human disasters and infectious
disease outbreaks, including the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the related disruption to
local, regional and global economic activity and financial markets, and the impact that any of the
foregoing may have on us and our customers and other constituencies;
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business or changes in the monetary and
fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve
Board;
technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;
success or consummation of new business initiatives may be more difficult or expensive than
expected;
the inability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and financial institutions into our business
operations;
adverse changes in the securities markets;
i
•
•
•
•
•
our inability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses;
a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including cyberattacks;
the inability of third party service providers to perform; and
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by bank regulatory agencies or the
Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this report and in other public statements we make may
later prove incorrect because of inaccurate assumptions, the factors illustrated above or other factors that we cannot
foresee. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Except as required by applicable law or
regulation, we do not undertake, and we specifically disclaim any obligation, to release publicly the result of any
revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the
statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Further information on other factors that could affect us are included in the section captioned “Item 1A: Risk
Factors.”
ii
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
PART I
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated in
May 2021 to be the successor to NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., a federally chartered corporation (the “Mid-Tier
Holding Company”), upon completion of the second-step conversion of NorthEast Community Bank (the “Bank”) from
the two-tier mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure. NorthEast Community Bancorp,
MHC was the former mutual holding company for the Mid-Tier Holding Company prior to the completion of the
second-step conversion. In conjunction with the second-step conversion, each of NorthEast Community Bancorp, MHC
and the Mid-Tier Holding Company merged out of existence and now cease to exist. The second-step conversion was
completed on July 12, 2021, at which time the Company sold, for gross proceeds of $97.8 million, a total
of 9,784,077 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share. As part of the second-step conversion, each of the existing
outstanding shares of Mid-Tier Holding Company common stock owned by persons other than NorthEast Community
Bancorp, MHC was converted into 1.3400 shares of Company common stock. As a result of the second-step conversion,
all share information has been subsequently revised to reflect the 1.3400 exchange ratio, unless otherwise noted.
The Bank is a New York State-chartered savings bank and completed its conversion from a federally-chartered
savings bank effective as of the close of business on June 29, 2012. The Company’s primary activity is the ownership
and operation of the Bank.
The Bank is headquartered in White Plains, New York. The Bank was founded in 1934 and is a community
oriented financial institution dedicated to serving the financial services needs of individuals and businesses within its
market area. The Bank currently conducts business through its ten branch offices located in Bronx, New York, Orange,
Rockland and Westchester Counties in New York and Essex, Middlesex and Norfolk Counties in Massachusetts
and three loan production offices located in White Plains, New York, New City, New York and Danvers, Massachusetts.
The Bank’s principal business consists of originating primarily construction loans and, to a lesser extent,
commercial and industrial loans and multifamily and mixed-use residential real estate loans and non-residential real
estate loans. The Bank offers a variety of retail deposit products to the general public in the areas surrounding its main
office and its branch offices, with interest rates that are competitive with those of similar products offered by other
financial institutions operating in its market area. The Bank also utilizes borrowings as a source of funds. The Bank’s
revenues are derived primarily from interest on loans and, to a lesser extent, interest on investment securities and
mortgage-backed securities. The Bank also generates revenues from other income including deposit fees, service charges
and investment advisory fees.
The Bank also offers investment advisory and financial planning services under the name Harbor West Wealth
Management Group, a division of the Bank, through a networking arrangement with a registered broker-dealer and
investment advisor.
Our executive offices are located at 325 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, New York 10601 and our telephone
number is (914) 684-2500. Our website address is www.necb.com. Information on our website should not be considered
a part of this report.
Throughout this report, references to “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the Company or the Bank, or both, as the
context indicates.
Market Area
We are headquartered in White Plains, New York, which is located in Westchester County, and we operate
through our main and annex offices in White Plains, two full-service branch offices in the New York City borough of
Manhattan (New York County), one full-service branch office in the New York City borough of the Bronx (Bronx
County), two full-service branch offices in Rockland County, New York, two full-service branch offices in Orange
County, New York, and three full-service branches in Danvers (Essex County), Framingham (Middlesex County) and
1
Quincy (Norfolk County), Massachusetts, and loan production offices in White Plains, New York, New City, New York
and Danvers, Massachusetts. We generate deposits through our main office and ten branch offices. We conduct lending
activities primarily in the State of New York, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and, to a lesser extent, in New
Jersey. We also have a limited number of loans in Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania, states in which we
no longer originate loans.
Our construction loans originated in Orange, Rockland and Sullivan Counties in New York and Brooklyn
(Kings County) are almost exclusively located within homogeneous communities that demonstrate significant population
growth concentrated in well-defined existing, and newer expanding, communities. Construction loans originated in
Bronx County are located in high demand, high absorption areas. These communities are substantially different from
New York State and nationwide economic fluctuations and are considered to be high absorption areas, i.e., where the
demand for rental or purchase properties is far greater than available supply.
With respect to the markets in which we primarily originate non-construction loans, our market area includes a
population base with a broad cross section of wealth, employment and ethnicity. We operate in markets that generally
have experienced relatively slow demographic growth, a characteristic typical of mature urban markets located
throughout the Northeast region. New York County is a relatively affluent market, reflecting the influence of Wall Street
along with the presence of a broad spectrum of Fortune 500 companies. Comparatively, Bronx County is home to a
broad socioeconomic spectrum, with a significant portion of the respective populations employed in relatively low and
moderate wage blue collar jobs. Westchester and neighboring counties are affluent markets, serving as desired suburban
locations for commuting into New York City and White Plains as well as reflecting growth of higher paying jobs in the
counties.
The counties of Massachusetts in which the Danvers, Framingham, and Quincy offices currently operate
include a mixture of rural, suburban and urban markets. The economies of these areas were historically based on
manufacturing, but, similar to many areas of the country, the underpinnings of these economies are now more service
oriented, with employment spread across many economic sectors including service, finance, health-care, technology, real
estate and government.
While our New York and Massachusetts markets have different economic characteristics, our customer base in
these states tends to be similar and is comprised mostly of owners of low to moderate income apartment buildings or
non-residential real estate in low to moderate income areas.
We periodically evaluate our network of banking offices to optimize the penetration in our market area. Our
business strategy currently includes opening new branches in and around our market area.
Competition
We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct
competition for deposits and loans has historically come from the numerous national, regional and local community
financial institutions operating in our market area, including a number of independent banks and credit unions, in
addition to other financial service companies, such as brokerage firms and other similar entities. In addition, we face
competition for investors’ funds from money market funds and other corporate and government securities. Competition
for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial service companies entering the commercial
real estate or construction lending market, such as financial technology companies, securities companies and specialty
finance companies.
We believe that our long-standing presence in our market areas in New York and Massachusetts, and our
personal service philosophy enhance our ability to compete favorably in attracting and retaining individual and business
customers. We actively solicit deposit-related customers and compete for deposits by offering customers personal
attention, professional service and competitive interest rates.
Lending Activities
We originate loans primarily for investment purposes. The largest segment of our loan portfolio is construction
loans followed by commercial and industrial loans. We also originate multifamily, mixed-use and non-residential real
2
estate loans. We consider our lending territory to be the New York State/New York City Metropolitan area and the
Massachusetts/Boston Metropolitan area. We also originate a limited number of loans in New Jersey. Although we no
longer originate loans in Connecticut, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania, we also have a limited number of loans in
these three states. At December 31, 2021, $872.6 million, or 89.7% of our portfolio was secured by loans in the New
York State/New York Metropolitan Area, $49.9 million, or 5.1% of our portfolio was secured by loans in the
Massachusetts/Boston Metropolitan Area and $50.3 million, or 5.2% of our portfolio was secured by loans in
Connecticut, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Construction Loans. In 2012, we entered the Massachusetts construction market by originating construction
loans secured by the construction of multifamily and single family properties as an accommodation to maintain and/or
develop relationships with our deposit and loan customers. In the same manner, during the latter part of 2013 we entered
the New York construction market by originating construction loans secured by the construction of multifamily and
residential condominium properties located in New York State, primarily in Bronx, Orange, Rockland and Sullivan
Counties in New York.
We primarily make construction loans to borrowers and developers that we know or that are referred to us by
existing customers for construction in high absorption, homogeneous communities. The demand for housing (whether
for rent or for purchase) is far greater in these high absorption communities than the available supply. This lack of
balance between supply and demand leads to available units being under contracts of sale or leases signed very soon
after certificates of occupancy are received by the building owners. Generally, in homogeneous communities, units that
are under construction have purchase contracts before they are complete.
We will make construction loans on condominium buildings, containing between two to more than 250 units or
for single family homes and single family housing developments of as many as 400 homes, in each case in high
absorption and/or homogeneous areas. For such loans, we do not offer permanent financing. We do not originate land
acquisition and development loans unless the land is ready to build with all permits in place or construction is “as of
right.”
Construction loans are typically for 18 to 36 month terms, pay interest only during that period, and are indexed
to the prime rate plus a margin. All construction loans are underwritten on an “as is” basis and an “as completed” basis
and must meet our normal loan to value ratio requirements. In addition, if construction loans are for condominiums, as a
backstop, the project will be underwritten as if they will be rental properties.
We generally require the borrower to contribute between 40 to 50% of the total raw land acquisition cost. If an
existing structure is to be demolished, the loan to value ratio will be limited to 60% of the improved land value alone. To
ensure sufficient construction funds are available for a project, we may elect to finance up to 100% of the construction
costs, which includes a 10% contingency, in an amount not to exceed 70% of the “as complete” appraised value. We also
require the borrower to submit various construction documentations, including but not necessarily limited to cost
estimates, property surveys, approved building plans and specifications, and approved building permits. We require our
borrowers to fund an interest reserve in advance. As a project progresses and the borrower requests funds to continue the
project, we require an engineer consultant to inspect the project to verify that the work has been completed prior to
disbursing the funds sought. We also obtain a title continuation update to confirm that no liens have been placed on the
project. Inspections for the purpose of funding/advancing proceeds are conducted by one of our employees as well as by
a third-party construction inspector approved by us.
Construction loans in Orange, Rockland and Sullivan Counties consist primarily of loans to construct
contemporary town-house style condominium buildings and complexes containing from four to 250 units. Construction
loans in Bronx County consist primarily of loans to construct affordable rental apartment buildings containing between
ten and 50 or more apartments. Most buildings are granted real estate tax abatements under New York City’s 421-A
program due to the affordable nature of the apartments in the buildings. Our average construction loan ranges from
$3.0 million to $7.0 million on buildings and complexes ranging from 20 to 40 units.
We typically grant separate land and construction loans and occasionally site development loans secured by the
project. At December 31, 2021, if we were to count land, construction and development loans as separate loans, our
construction loan portfolio consisted of 538 loans totaling $1.2 billion in committed amount, comprising of outstanding
3
disbursed balance of $683.8 million and undisbursed loans in process of $436.9 million. At December 31, 2021, the
construction loan portfolio was comprised primarily of 525 New York construction loans with $1.1 billion in committed
amount, comprising of outstanding disbursed balance of $665.0 million and undisbursed loans in process of $422.7
million.
At December 31, 2021, if we were to combine land, construction and development loans as one loan on a
project, our construction loan portfolio consisted of 302 loans totaling $1.2 billion in committed amount, comprising of
outstanding disbursed balance of $683.8 million and undisbursed loans in process of $436.9 million. At December 31,
2021, the construction loan portfolio was comprised primarily of 294 New York construction loans with $1.1 billion in
committed amount, comprising of outstanding disbursed balances of $665.0 million and undisbursed loans in process
of $422.7 million.
All construction loans were performing according to their terms at December 31, 2021. If we were to combine
land, construction and development loans as one loan on a project, the average size in our construction loan portfolio
was $3.9 million in committed amount, comprising of outstanding disbursed balances of $2.3 million and undisbursed
loans in process of $1.4 million at December 31, 2021
Our largest outstanding construction loan had a balance of $13.6 million and was performing in accordance
with its terms at December 31, 2021. This loan is secured by a mixed-use building located in the Bronx, New York. Our
largest committed construction loan had a total commitment of $43.6 million of which 50.0% of the commitment has
been sold to another financial institution thereby reducing our committed portion to $21.8 million. Our portion of this
construction loan had an outstanding balance of $6.0 million and was performing in accordance with its terms at
December 31, 2021. This loan is secured by the development of a 160,000 square foot class A office building located in
Monsey, New York.
At December 31, 2021, our largest outstanding construction loan relationship with one borrower was comprised
of three construction loans with outstanding balances totaling $10.7 million with no available loans in process. This
relationship also had four commercial and industrial lines of credit totaling $16.5 million with an outstanding balance of
$10.5 million at December 31, 2021, one multi-family mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of $921,000 at
December 31, 2021, and five stand-by letters of credit totaling $855,000 with no outstanding balance at December 31,
2021. All of these loans were performing in accordance with their terms at December 31, 2021.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. We provide credit to commercial and industrial businesses that are located
within our market area. We also provide commercial and industrial loans to real estate developers in the New York
Metropolitan Area. Pursuant to our lending policy, we generally limit the aggregate of all loans and lines of credit
(including unused commitments) to any one borrower to no more than 10% of our Tier 1 Capital. It is our policy to
require a guaranty of all owners of the borrower who own 20% or more of the business and we impose collateral
requirements on our commercial and industrial loans.
Interest rates and payments on our commercial and industrial loans are typically indexed to the prime rate as
published in the Wall Street Journal and adjusted as the prime rate changes. At December 31, 2021, the average balance
of loans in our commercial and industrial loan portfolio was $669,000.
At December 31, 2021, the largest outstanding commercial and industrial loan had a balance of $21.2 million
with no remaining available line of credit. The loan is secured by an office and warehouse complex located in Totowa,
New Jersey. The largest outstanding commercial and industrial line of credit relationship with one borrower was
comprised of three lines of credit totaling $30.0 million, with outstanding balances totaling $2.6 million and remaining
available lines of credit totaling $27.4 million. However, pursuant to the terms of the governing loan documents, the
borrower cannot at any one time have more than $10 million outstanding in the aggregate with respect to all three lines
of credit.
All the aforementioned commercial and industrial loans were performing according to their terms at
December 31, 2021.
4
Multifamily and Mixed-Use Real Estate Loans. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by
multifamily and mixed-use real estate. These loans are comprised primarily of loans on moderate income apartment
buildings located in our lending territory and include, loans on cooperative apartment buildings (in the New York area),
and loans for Section 8 multifamily housing. In New York, most of the apartment buildings that we lend on are rent-
stabilized. Mixed-use real estate loans are secured by properties that are intended for both residential and business use.
We also originate multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans in Massachusetts and, on a limited basis, in New Jersey.
We also have a limited number of multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans in Connecticut, New Hampshire, and
Pennsylvania.
We also offer construction/renovation loans on multifamily and mixed-use rental properties in high absorption
areas, dependent on vacancy rates in relation to borough or town averages. In recent years, we have de-emphasized
multifamily and mixed-use real estate lending as we have focused more on construction lending.
We have been originating multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans in the New York State/New York
Metropolitan Area for 88 years. In the New York State/New York Metropolitan Area, our ability to continue to grow our
portfolio is dependent on the continuation of our relationships with mortgage brokers, as the multifamily and mixed-use
real estate loan market is primarily broker driven. We have longstanding relationships with mortgage brokers in the New
York market area, who are familiar with our lending practices and our underwriting standards. We also deal directly with
building owners throughout our lending area. At December 31, 2021, multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans to
borrowers in the New York State/New York Metropolitan Area totaled $73.4 million.
In the Massachusetts/Boston Metropolitan Area, where we have also originated such loans, the primary source
of mortgage loan originations are from personal contacts by our loan officers, referrals from existing customers and
advertising. We generally retain for our portfolio all of the loans that we originate in Massachusetts. At December 31,
2021, multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans to borrowers in the Massachusetts/Boston Metropolitan Area totaled
$26.8 million.
We originate a variety of adjustable-rate and balloon multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans. The
adjustable-rate loans have fixed rates for a period of one, two, three and five years and then adjust every one, two, three
or five years thereafter, based on the terms of the loan. Maturities on these loans can be up to 15 years, and typically they
amortize over a 20 to 30-year period. Interest rates on our adjustable-rate loans are adjusted to a rate that equals the
applicable one-, two-, three- or five-year Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of New York or FHLB of Boston advance
rate plus a margin. The balloon loans have a maximum maturity of five years. The lifetime interest rate cap is
five percentage points over the initial interest rate of the loan (four percentage points for loans with one-, two- and three-
year terms). The typical multifamily or mixed-use real estate loan refinances within the first five-year period and, in
doing so, generates prepayment penalties ranging from one to five points of the outstanding loan balance. Under our
loan-refinancing program, borrowers who are current under the terms and conditions of their contractual obligations can
apply to refinance their existing loans to the rates and terms then offered on new loans after the payment of their
contractual prepayment penalties.
In making multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans, we primarily consider the net operating income
generated by the real estate to support the debt service, the financial resources, income level and managerial expertise of
the borrower, the marketability of the property and our lending experience with the borrower. We typically require a
personal guarantee of the borrower. We rate the property underlying the loan as Class A, B or C. Our current policy is to
require a minimum debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of earnings after subtracting all operating expenses to debt
service payments) of between 1.25x and 1.40x depending on the rating of the underlying property. The average
multifamily loan debt-service coverage is 2.81x and the average loan-to-value ratio of our multifamily real estate loans is
35.9%. The average mixed-use real estate loan debt-service coverage is 2.60x and the average loan-to-value ratio of our
mixed-use real estate loans is 29.6%. On multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans, our current policy is to finance up
to 75% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the property securing the loan on purchases and
refinances of Class A and B properties and up to 65% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price for properties
that are rated Class C. Properties securing multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans are appraised by independent
appraisers, inspected by us and generally require Phase 1 environmental surveys.
5
The majority of the multifamily real estate loans in our portfolio are secured by ten unit to 100 unit apartment
buildings. At December 31, 2021, the majority of our mixed-use real estate loans are secured by properties that are at
least 85% residential.
Loans secured by multifamily and mixed-use real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater
degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in multifamily residential and
mixed-use real estate lending is the borrower’s credit-worthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the
project. Payments on loans secured by income producing properties often depend on successful operation and
management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent than residential
real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. In reaching a decision on whether to
make a multifamily residential or mixed-use real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of the property, the
borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property.
On December 31, 2021, the largest outstanding multifamily real estate loan had a balance of $8.8 million and
was performing according to its terms at December 31, 2021. This loan is secured by a 218 unit apartment complex
located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The largest mixed-use real estate loan had a balance of $2.6 million and was performing according to its terms
at December 31, 2021. This loan is secured by four mixed-use buildings with 11 apartment units and five commercial
units located in Brooklyn, New York. As of December 31, 2021, the average loan size in our multifamily and mixed-use
portfolio was approximately $698,000.
Non-Residential Real Estate Loans. Our non-residential real estate loans are generally secured by office
buildings, medical facilities and retail shopping centers that are primarily located within our lending area.
At December 31, 2021, our non-residential real estate loan portfolio was comprised mainly of $41.9 million of
loans secured by properties in the New York State/New York Metropolitan Area, $5.7 million of loans secured by
properties in the Massachusetts/Boston Metropolitan Area, and $2.4 million of loans secured by properties in
Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
We have de-emphasized the origination of non-residential real estate loans in recent years as we began
increasing our origination of construction loans.
Our non-residential real estate loans are structured in a manner similar to our multifamily and mixed-use real
estate loans, typically at a fixed rate of interest for three to five years and then a rate that adjusts every three to five years
over the term of the loan, which is typically 15 years. Interest rates and payments on these loans generally are based on
the one-, two-, three- or five-year FHLB of New York or FHLB of Boston advance rate plus a margin. The lifetime
interest rate cap is five percentage points over the initial interest rate of the loan (four percentage points for loans with
one-, two- and three-year terms). Loans are secured by first mortgages that generally do not exceed 75% of the
property’s appraised value. Properties securing non-residential real estate loans are appraised by independent appraisers
and inspected by us.
We also charge prepayment penalties, with five points of the outstanding loan balance generally being charged
on loans that refinance in the first year of the mortgage, scaling down to one point on loans that refinance in year five.
These loans are typically repaid or the term extended before maturity, in which case a new rate is negotiated to meet
market conditions and an extension of the loan is executed for a new term with a new amortization schedule. Our non-
residential real estate loans tend to refinance within the first five-year period.
Our assessment of credit risk and our underwriting standards and procedures for non-residential real estate
loans are similar to those applicable to our multifamily and mixed-use real estate loans. In reaching a decision on
whether to make a non-residential real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s
expertise, credit history and profitability and the value of the underlying property. In addition, with respect to rental
properties, we will also consider the term of the lease and the credit quality of the tenants. We have generally required
that the properties securing non-residential real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings after
subtracting all operating expenses to debt service payments) of between 1.25x and 1.40x. The average non-residential
6
loan debt-service coverage ratio is 2.17x and the average loan-to-value ratio of our non-residential loans is 44.6%.
Phase 1 environmental surveys are required for most loans and property inspections are required for all loans.
At December 31, 2021, we had $50.0 million in non-residential real estate loans outstanding, or 5.1% of total
loans. At December 31, 2021, the largest outstanding non-residential real estate loan had an outstanding balance of $10.0
million. This loan is secured by a 16-acre site, which is listed on the national and state registries for historic places. The
property consists of 12 buildings totaling approximately 160,000 square feet, including a large central convent, chapel,
elementary school, high school, administrative building and other ancillary structures located in White Plains, New
York. This loan was performing according to its terms at December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2021, this loan was also
the largest outstanding non-residential real estate loan relationship with one borrower and was performing in accordance
with its terms. As of December 31, 2021, the average balance of loans in our non-residential loan portfolio was
$960,000.
Consumer Loans. We offer personal loans, loans secured by savings accounts or certificates of deposit (share
loans), and overdraft protection for checking accounts which is linked to statement savings accounts and has the ability
to transfer funds from the statement savings account to the checking account when needed to cover overdrafts. At
December 31, 2021, our portfolio of consumer loans was $269,000, or 0.03% of total loans.
Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer
loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted
consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency
often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections
depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job
loss, divorce, illness, or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including
federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
Originations, Purchase, Participations and Sales of Loans. Loan originations come from a number of
sources. The primary source of loan originations are our in-house loan officers and referrals from customers and, to a
lesser extent, mortgage loan brokers and local realtors. Historically, we have primarily originated our own loans and
retained them in our portfolio.
While in the past we purchased a limited number of participations from one financial institution that also serves
high absorption areas in Brooklyn, New York, we currently have only one such participation loan in our portfolio. At
December 31, 2021, the participation loan totaled $1.5 million and was performing according to its terms. We also
purchased whole loans from one financial institution during 2021. At December 31, 2021, these whole purchased loans
totaled $3.1 million and were performing according to their terms.
We occasionally sell participations interests in construction loans we have originated in high absorption areas to
other community banks in order to maintain compliance with our loans-to-one borrower limits. We have also historically
sold participation interests in our construction loans to the Company and we may continue to do so in the future. At
December 31, 2021, the Company held $4.5 million in participation interests in construction loans originated by the
Bank. Through our loan participations, we and the other participating lenders generally share ratably in cash flows and
points and fees and gains or losses that may result from a borrower’s noncompliance with the contractual terms of the
loan.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory
underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board of directors and management.
All construction, multifamily, mixed use and nonresidential real estate loans and commercial and industrial
loans must be approved by a unanimous vote of the members of the Loan Committee, which is composed of the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
At each monthly meeting of the board of directors, the board reviews all commitments issued, regardless of
size.
7
Loans to One Borrower. Pursuant to New York law and federal banking regulations, the aggregate amount of
loans that the Bank is permitted to make to any one borrower or a group of related borrowers is generally limited to 15%
of its capital, surplus fund and undivided profits (25% if the amount in excess of 15% is secured by “readily marketable
collateral”). At December 31, 2021, based on the 15% limitation, the Bank’s loans-to-one-borrower limit was
approximately $29.4 million. On the same date, the Bank had no borrowers with outstanding balances in excess of this
amount.
Loan Commitments. We issue commitments for adjustable-rate mortgage loans conditioned upon the
occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our
customers and generally expire in 60 days.
Delinquencies. When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the
borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower toward
the end of the month when the payment is due and then again when loan becomes ten to 15 days past due. If payment is
not received by the 30th day of delinquency, additional letters are sent and phone calls are made to the customer. When
the loan becomes 60 days past due and if the borrower is unresponsive, we generally commence foreclosure proceedings
against any real property that secures the loan or attempt to repossess any personal property that secures a commercial
and industrial or consumer loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or
refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure. We may consider
loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain circumstances. Management informs the board of
directors on a monthly basis of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days, all loans in foreclosure and all
foreclosed and repossessed property that we own.
Due to the impact of COVID-19 on our borrowers, we granted eligible loan deferrals on 196 existing loans with
outstanding balances of $190.9 million (at the time payment deferral was requested) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief
and Economic Security (the “CARES Act”). Generally, these deferrals included the deferral of principal and interest
payments for a period of three months, although interest income continued to accrue. As of December 31, 2021, one loan
with an aggregate balance of $79,000 remains on deferral under the CARES Act. As of February 1, 2022, the loan was
returned to normal payment status.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations,
securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, municipal securities, deposits at the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions.
At December 31, 2021, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of mutual funds, residential mortgage-
backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae with stated final maturities of 10 years or more,
and municipal securities with maturities of three years or more.
Our investment portfolio is primarily viewed as a source of liquidity. Our investment management policy is
designed to provide adequate liquidity to meet any reasonable deposit outflows and any anticipated increase in the loan
portfolio through conversion of secondary reserves to cash and to provide safety of principal and interest through
investment in securities under limitations and restrictions prescribed in banking regulations. Consistent with liquidity
and safety requirements, our policy is designed to generate a significant amount of stable income and to provide
collateral for advances and repurchase agreements. The policy is also designed to serve as a counter-cyclical balance to
earnings in that the investment portfolio will absorb funds when loan demand is low and will infuse funds when loan
demand is high.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits, borrowings and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other
investment activities. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and
loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and market conditions.
8
Deposit Accounts. The vast majority of our depositors are residents of the States of New York and
Massachusetts. Deposits are obtained primarily from customers residing in or working in the communities in which our
branches are located, and we rely on our long-standing relationships with our customers to retain these deposits. We
also obtain deposits from our commercial and industrial and construction loan customers. These deposits tend to be a
stable source of funds. We offer of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including checking accounts, money market
accounts, regular savings accounts, non-interest bearing demand accounts (such as checking accounts and certificates of
deposits. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must
remain on deposit, and the interest rate among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we
consider the rates offered by our competition, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and customer
preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing weekly. Our current strategy is to offer
competitive rates, but not be the market leader in every type and maturity.
In addition, we utilize brokered, listing service and military deposits, which represent a viable and cost effective
addition to our deposit gathering and maintenance strategy, often at a lower “all-in” cost when compared to our retail
branch network. This strategy allows us to very effectively match the maturity of these deposits to the term of our
construction loans, which make up a majority of the loans in our loan portfolio.
Borrowings. We may utilize advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York to supplement our
supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a
central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital
stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such
stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities that are obligations of, or guaranteed by,
the United States), provided certain standards related to credit-worthiness have been met. Advances are made under
several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program,
limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the
Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s credit-worthiness. Under its current credit policies, the
Federal Home Loan Bank generally limits advances to 25% of a member’s assets, and short-term borrowings of less than
one year may not exceed 10% of the institution’s assets. The Federal Home Loan Bank determines specific lines of
credit for each member institution. We had approximately $28.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
outstanding at December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2021, we had the ability to borrow an additional $29.4 million from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, we had $8.0 million of available
credit from Atlantic Community Bankers Bank.
Investment Advisory and Financial Planning Activities
Harbor West Wealth Management Group, a division of the Bank, performs a wide range of financial planning
and investment advisory services based on the needs of a diversified client base including, but not limited to: wealth
management based on a clients’ time dimension, risk aversion/tolerance, value system and specific needs; transition
planning from one career to another, especially the transition to retirement; conducting risk assessment and management
on issues related to various kinds of insurance-covered contingencies; and providing assistance relating to the ultimate
disposition of assets. Investment advisory and financial planning services are offered through a networking arrangement
with a registered broker-dealer and investment advisor.
Regulation and Supervision
General
The Bank is a New York-chartered savings bank. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Bank is subject to extensive regulation by the New York State
Department of Financial Services, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, as its primary federal regulator. The Bank
is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the New York State Department of
Financial Services concerning its activities and financial condition, and must obtain regulatory approvals prior to
entering into certain transactions, including, but not limited to, mergers with or acquisitions of other financial
institutions. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.
9
The regulation and supervision of the Bank establish a comprehensive framework of activities in which an
institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and borrowers and, for purposes of the
FDIC, the protection of the insurance fund. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive
discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies
with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.
The Bank has elected to be deemed a “savings association” under the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended. As
a result, the Company is a savings and loan holding company and is required to comply with the rules and regulations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) applicable to savings and loan
holding companies. The Company is required to file certain reports with the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to
examination by and the enforcement authority of the Federal Reserve Board. The Company is also subject to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.
Any change in applicable laws or regulations, whether by the New York State Department of Financial
Services, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board, the State of New York or Congress, could have a material adverse
impact on the operations and financial performance of the Company and the Bank. In addition, the Company and the
Bank will be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of various agencies of the United States Government, including
the Federal Reserve Board. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, it is
impossible for management to accurately predict future changes in monetary policy or the effect of such changes on the
business or financial condition of the Company and the Bank.
Set forth below is a brief description of material regulatory requirements that are applicable to the Bank and the
Company. The description is limited to certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, and is not
intended to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on the Bank and the Company.
COVID-19
Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications. On March 22, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an
interagency statement to provide additional guidance to financial institutions who are working with borrowers affected
by the coronavirus (“COVID-19”). The statement provided that agencies will not criticize institutions for working with
borrowers and will not direct supervised institutions to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan
modifications as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). The agencies have confirmed with staff of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board that short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to
borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not TDRs. This includes short-term (e.g., six months) modifications
such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant.
Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a
modification program is implemented.
The statement further provided that working with borrowers that are current on existing loans, either
individually or as part of a program for creditworthy borrowers who are experiencing short-term financial or operational
problems as a result of COVID-19, generally would not be considered TDRs. For modification programs designed to
provide temporary relief for current borrowers affected by COVID-19, financial institutions may presume that borrowers
that are current on payments are not experiencing financial difficulties at the time of the modification for purposes of
determining TDR status, and thus no further TDR analysis is required for each loan modification in the program.
The statement indicated that the agencies’ examiners will exercise judgment in reviewing loan modifications,
including TDRs, and will not automatically adversely risk rate credits that are affected by COVID-19, including those
considered TDRs.
In addition, the statement noted that efforts to work with borrowers of one- to-four family residential
mortgages, where the loans are prudently underwritten, and not past due or carried on non-accrual status, will not result
in the loans being considered restructured or modified for the purposes of their risk-based capital rules. With regard to
loans not otherwise reportable as past due, financial institutions are not expected to designate loans with deferrals
granted due to COVID-19 as past due because of the deferral.
10
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. The CARES Act, which became law on March 27,
2020, provided over $2 trillion to combat COVID-19 and stimulate the economy. The law had several provisions
relevant to financial institutions, including:
•
•
•
•
Allowing institutions not to characterize loan modifications relating to the COVID-19 pandemic as a
troubled debt restructuring and also allowing them to suspend the corresponding impairment
determination for accounting purposes.
An option to delay the implementation of the accounting standard for current expected credit losses
(CECL) until the earlier of December 31, 2020 or when the President declares that the coronavirus
emergency is terminated.
The ability of a borrower of a federally backed mortgage loan (VA, FHA, USDA, Freddie and Fannie)
experiencing financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 pandemic to request
forbearance from paying their mortgage by submitting a request to the borrower’s servicer affirming
their financial hardship during the COVID-19 emergency. Such a forbearance will be granted for up to
180 days, which can be extended for an additional 180-day period upon the request of the borrower.
During that time, no fees, penalties or interest beyond the amounts scheduled or calculated as if the
borrower made all contractual payments on time and in full under the mortgage contract will accrue on
the borrower’s account. Except for vacant or abandoned property, the servicer of a federally backed
mortgage is prohibited from taking any foreclosure action, including any eviction or sale action, for
not less than the 60-day period beginning March 18, 2020.
The ability of a borrower of a multi-family federally backed mortgage loan that was current as of
February 1, 2020, to submit a request for forbearance to the borrower’s servicer affirming that the
borrower is experiencing financial hardship during the COVID-19 emergency. A forbearance will be
granted for up to 30 days, which can be extended for up to two additional 30-day periods upon the
request of the borrower. During the time of the forbearance, the multi-family borrower cannot evict or
initiate the eviction of a tenant or charge any late fees, penalties or other charges to a tenant for late
payment of rent. Additionally, a multi-family borrower that receives a forbearance may not require a
tenant to vacate a dwelling unit before a date that is 30 days after the date on which the borrower
provides the tenant notice to vacate and may not issue a notice to vacate until after the expiration of the
forbearance.
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021. On December 27, 2020, the
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 was signed into law, which also contains
provisions that could directly impact financial institutions, including extending the time that insured depository
institutions and depository institution holding companies have to comply with the current expected credit losses
(“CECL”) accounting standard and extending the authority granted to banks under the CARES Act to elect to
temporarily suspend the requirements under U.S. GAAP applicable to troubled debt restructurings for loan modifications
related to the COVID-19 pandemic for any loan that was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The
act directs financial regulators to support community development financial institutions and minority depository
institutions and directs Congress to re-appropriate $429 billion in unobligated CARES Act funds. The PPP, which was
originally established under the CARES Act, was also extended under the Coronavirus Response and Relief
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021.
Bank Regulation
New York Banking Law. The Bank derives its lending, investment, and other authority primarily from the
applicable provisions of New York State banking law and the regulations of the New York State Department of
Financial Services, as limited by FDIC regulations. Under these laws and regulations, banks, including the Bank, may
invest in real estate mortgages, consumer and commercial loans, certain types of debt securities (including certain
corporate debt securities, and obligations of federal, state, and local governments and agencies), certain types of
corporate equity securities, and certain other assets.
11
Under New York State banking law, New York State-chartered stock form savings banks and commercial
banks may declare and pay dividends out of their net profits, unless there is an impairment of capital. Approval of the
Superintendent is required if the total of all dividends declared by the bank in a calendar year would exceed the total of
its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years, less prior dividends paid.
New York State banking law gives the Superintendent authority to issue an order to a New York State-chartered
banking institution to appear and explain an apparent violation of law, to discontinue unauthorized or unsafe practices,
and to keep prescribed books and accounts. Upon a finding by the New York State Department of Financial Services that
any director, trustee, or officer of any banking organization has violated any law, or has continued unauthorized or
unsafe practices in conducting the business of the banking organization after having been notified by the Superintendent
to discontinue such practices, such director, trustee, or officer may be removed from office after notice and an
opportunity to be heard. The Superintendent also has authority to appoint a conservator or a receiver for a savings or
commercial bank under certain circumstances.
Capital Requirements. Federal regulations require FDIC-insured depository institutions to meet several
minimum capital standards: a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-
based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets ratio of 8%, and a Tier 1 capital to average assets leverage
ratio of 4%.
For purposes of the regulatory capital requirements, common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as
common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and
additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related
surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital
(common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital
instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-
term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt.
Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-
weighted assets and, for institutions that made such an election regarding the treatment of accumulated other
comprehensive income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily
determinable fair market values. Institutions that have not exercised the AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into
common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale-securities). The Bank
exercised the opt-out and therefore does not include AOCI in its regulatory capital determinations. Calculation of all
types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (such as recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests)
are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset.
Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of
0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently
underwritten first lien one- to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and
consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is
assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.
In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital
distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital
conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset above the amount
necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement began being
phased in starting on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased each year until fully implemented
at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. At December 31, 2021, the Bank exceeded the fully phased in regulatory requirement for
the capital conservation buffer.
The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act enacted in May 2018 required the
federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, to establish for banks with assets of less than $10 billion of assets a
community bank leverage ratio (the ratio of a bank’s tangible equity capital to average total consolidated assets) of 8 to
10%. A qualifying community bank with capital meeting the specified requirements (including off balance sheet
12
exposures of 25% or less of total assets and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total assets) and electing to
follow the alternative framework is considered to meet all applicable regulatory capital requirements including the risk-
based requirements. The community bank leverage ratio was established at 9%, effective January 1, 2020. A qualifying
bank may opt in and out of the community bank leverage ratio framework on its quarterly call report. A bank that ceases
to meet any qualifying criteria is provided with a two-quarter grace period to comply with the community bank leverage
ratio requirements or the general capital regulations by the federal regulators. In addition, Section 4012 of the CARES
Act required that the community bank leverage ratio be temporarily lowered to 8%. The federal regulators issued a
rule making the lower ratio effective April 23, 2020. The rules also established a two-quarter grace period for a
qualifying community bank whose leverage ratio falls below the 8% community bank leverage ratio requirement so long
as the bank maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater. Another rule was issued providing for the transition back to the
9% community bank leverage ratio, increasing the ratio to 8.5% for calendar year 2021 and to 9% thereafter. As of
December 31, 2021, the Bank had not elected the community bank leverage ratio alternative reporting framework.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act required each federal banking agency to revise its
risk-based capital standards for insured institutions to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest-rate
risk, concentration of credit risk, and the risk of nontraditional activities, as well as to reflect the actual performance and
expected risk of loss on multifamily residential loans. The FDIC, along with the other federal banking agencies, adopted
a regulation providing that the agencies will take into account the exposure of a bank’s capital and economic value to
changes in interest rate risk in assessing a bank’s capital adequacy. The FDIC also has authority to establish individual
minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon determination that an institution’s capital level is, or is likely to
become, inadequate in light of the particular circumstances.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. As required by statute, the federal banking agencies adopted final
regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement safety and
soundness standards. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to
identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines address
internal controls and information systems, the internal audit system, credit underwriting, loan documentation, interest
rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The agencies have also
established standards for safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that
an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to
the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Investments and Activities. Under federal law, all state-chartered banks insured by the FDIC have generally
been limited to activities as principal and equity investments of the type and in the amount authorized for national banks,
notwithstanding state law. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act and the FDIC permit exceptions
to these limitations. For example, state-chartered banks may, with FDIC approval, continue to exercise grandfathered
state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed on a national securities exchange and in the shares of an
investment company registered under federal law. The maximum permissible investment is 100% of Tier 1 capital, as
specified by the FDIC’s regulations, or the maximum amount permitted by New York State banking law, whichever is
less. Such grandfathering authority may be terminated upon the FDIC’s determination that such investments pose a
safety and soundness risk to the Bank or if the Bank converts its charter or undergoes a change in control In addition, the
FDIC is authorized to permit such institutions to engage in other state authorized activities or investments (other than
non-subsidiary equity investments) that meet all applicable capital requirements if it is determined that such activities or
investments do not pose a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Interstate Banking and Branching. Federal law permits well capitalized and well managed bank and savings
and loan holding companies to acquire banks in any state, subject to Federal Reserve Board approval, certain
concentration limits and other specified conditions. Interstate mergers of banks are also authorized, subject to regulatory
approval and other specified conditions. In addition, amendments made by the Dodd-Frank Act to permit banks to
establish de novo branches on an interstate basis to the extent that branching is authorized by the law of the host state for
the banks chartered by that state.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory
authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For
13
these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. An institution is
deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of 8.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater. An
institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or greater.
An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio of less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%. An
institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of
less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as
defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank was a
“well capitalized” institution under FDIC regulations.
At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions and
prohibitions, including restrictions on growth, restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, restrictions or prohibitions
on the payment of dividends, and restrictions on the acceptance of brokered deposits. Furthermore, if an insured
depository institution is classified in one of the undercapitalized categories, it is required to submit a capital restoration
plan to the appropriate federal banking agency, and the holding company must guarantee the performance of that plan.
Based upon its capital levels, a bank that is classified as well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized may
be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and
opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition, or an unsafe or unsound practice, warrants such
treatment. An undercapitalized bank’s compliance with a capital restoration plan is required to be guaranteed by any
company that controls the undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the institution’s total
assets when deemed undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve the status of adequately capitalized. If an
“undercapitalized” bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.”
“Significantly undercapitalized” banks must comply with one or more of a number of additional restrictions, including
but not limited to an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to
reduce total assets, cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks or dismiss directors or officers, and restrictions
on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital distributions by the parent holding
company. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject to a narrow
exception, the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after it obtains such status.
The previously referenced law establishing a “community bank leverage ratio” adjusted the referenced
categories for qualifying institutions that opt into the alternative framework for regulatory capital requirements.
Institutions that exceed the community bank leverage ratio are considered to have met the capital ratio requirements to
be “well capitalized” for the agencies’ prompt corrective rules.
Transaction with Affiliates and Regulation W of the Federal Reserve Regulations. Transactions between banks
and their affiliates are governed by federal law. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls, is
controlled by or is under common control with the bank. In a holding company context, the parent bank or savings and
loan holding company and any companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the
bank (although subsidiaries of the bank itself, except financial subsidiaries, are generally not considered affiliates).
Generally, Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation W limit the extent to
which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to
10.0% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus, and with all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal
to 20.0% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus. Section 23B applies to “covered transactions” as well as to
certain other transactions and requires that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as
favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes
the making of loans to, purchase of assets from, and issuance of a guarantee to an affiliate, and other similar transactions.
Section 23B transactions also include the provision of services and the sale of assets by a bank to an affiliate. In addition,
loans or other extensions of credit by the financial institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in
accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
14
Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal Reserve Act place restrictions on loans to a bank’s insiders, i.e., executive
officers, directors and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an
executive officer and to a greater than 10.0% stockholder of a financial institution, and certain of their affiliated interests,
together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated interests, may not exceed specified limits.
Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal
stockholders be made on terms and conditions substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to persons
who are not insiders and also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of
extensions of credit by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus.
Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.
Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured state-chartered savings banks,
including the Bank. The enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties,
issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in
response to violations of laws and regulations, breaches of fiduciary duty and unsafe or unsound practices.
Federal Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Bank is a member of the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is
administered by the FDIC. Deposit accounts in the Bank are insured up to a maximum of $250,000 for each separately
insured depositor.
The FDIC imposes an assessment for deposit insurance on all depository institutions. Under the FDIC’s risk-
based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory
capital levels and certain other factors. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned
and certain adjustments specified by FDIC regulations, with less risky institutions paying lower rates. Assessment rates
(inclusive of possible adjustments) for most banks with less than $10 billion of assets currently range from 1 1∕2 to 30
basis points of each institution’s total assets less tangible capital. The FDIC may increase or decrease the scale
uniformly, except that no adjustment can deviate more than two basis points from the base scale without notice and
comment rulemaking. The FDIC’s current system represents a change, required by the Dodd-Frank Act, from its prior
practice of basing the assessment on an institution’s volume of deposits.
The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated
insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The FDIC was required to seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by
September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of $10 billion or more were supposed to fund the increase. The
FDIC indicated in November 2018 that the 1.35% ratio was exceeded. Insured institutions of less than $10 billion of
assets received credits for the portion of their assessments that contributed to raising the reserve ratio between 1.15% and
1.35% effective when the fund rate achieves 1.38%. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio,
instead leaving it to the discretion of the FDIC and the FDIC has exercised that discretion by establishing a long range
fund ratio of 2%.
The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would
likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Future insurance
assessment rates cannot be predicted.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe
or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, rule order or regulatory condition imposed in writing. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation
that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
Privacy Regulations. FDIC regulations generally require that the Bank disclose its privacy policy, including
identifying with whom it shares a customer’s “non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing
the customer relationship and annually thereafter. In addition, the Bank is required to provide its customers with the
ability to “opt-out” of having their personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and not to disclose account
numbers or access codes to non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes. The Bank currently has a privacy
protection policy in place and believes that such policy is in compliance with the regulations.
15
Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, as implemented by FDIC
regulations, a non-member bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound
operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an
institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular
community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA does require the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a non-
member bank, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into
account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution, including applications to acquire branches and other
financial institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance
utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. The Bank’s latest FDIC CRA rating was “Satisfactory”.
The Bank is also subject to provisions of the New York State banking law which imposes continuing and
affirmative obligations upon banking institutions organized in New York State to serve the credit needs of its local
community (the “NYCRA”) which are substantially similar to those imposed by the federal CRA. Pursuant to the
NYCRA, a bank must file copies of all federal CRA reports with the New York State Department of Financial Services.
The NYCRA requires the New York State Department of Financial Services to make a written assessment of a bank’s
compliance with the NYCRA every 24 to 36 months, utilizing a four-tiered rating system and make such assessment
available to the public. The NYCRA also requires the Superintendent to consider a bank’s NYCRA rating when
reviewing a bank’s application to engage in certain transactions, including mergers, asset purchases and the
establishment of branch offices or automated teller machines, and provides that such assessment may serve as a basis for
the denial of any such application. The Bank’s latest NYCRA rating was “Outstanding”.
Consumer Protection and Fair Lending Regulations. New York savings banks are subject to a variety of
federal statutes and regulations that are intended to protect consumers and prohibit discrimination in the granting of
credit. These statutes and regulations provide for a range of sanctions for non-compliance with their terms, including
imposition of administrative fines and remedial orders, and referral to the Attorney General for prosecution of a civil
action for actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief. Certain of these statutes authorize private individual and
class action lawsuits and the award of actual, statutory and punitive damages and attorneys’ fees for certain types of
violations.
USA PATRIOT Act. The Bank is subject to the USA PATRIOT Act, which gave federal agencies additional
powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded surveillance powers,
increased information sharing, and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. By way of amendments to the Bank
Secrecy Act, Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act provided measures intended to encourage information sharing among
bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of Title III impose affirmative
obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money
transfer agents, and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Other Regulations. Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the Bank are subject to state usury
laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Loan operations are also subject to state and federal laws applicable to
credit transactions, such as the:
•
•
•
•
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to
enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its
obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited
factors in extending credit;
Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting
agencies; and
Rules and regulations of the various federal and state agencies charged with the responsibility of
implementing such federal and state laws.
16
The deposit operations of the Bank also are subject to, among others, the:
•
•
•
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial
records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,”
such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original
paper check; and
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic
deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from
the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve Act authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to require depository
associations to maintain noninterest-earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily negotiable order of
withdrawal and regular checking accounts). The amounts are adjusted annually and, for 2019, the regulations provided
that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net
transaction accounts up to and including $127.5 million; and a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $127.5 million. The
first $16.9 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) were
exempted from the reserve requirements. The Bank complied with the foregoing requirements during 2019. On
March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board reduced reserve requirement to 0% effective as of March 26, 2020, which
eliminated reserve requirements for all depository institutions.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which
consists of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility
primarily for member institutions. At December 31, 2021, the Bank had a maximum borrowing capacity from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York of $57.4 million comprising of $29.4 million in available borrowings and $28.0
million in outstanding borrowings. The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, is required to
acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. The Bank was in compliance with
requirements for the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York with an investment of $1.5 million at December 31, 2021.
Holding Company Regulation
As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is subject to Federal Reserve Board regulations,
examinations, supervision, reporting requirements and regulations regarding its activities. Among other things, this
authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the
Bank.
Pursuant to federal law and regulations and policy, a savings and loan holding company such as the Company
may generally engage in the activities permitted for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding
Company Act and certain other activities that have been authorized for savings and loan holding companies by
regulation.
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company from, directly or indirectly or through one or more
subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association, or savings and loan holding
company thereof, without prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board or from acquiring or retaining, with
certain exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary holding company or savings association. A savings and loan
holding company is also prohibited from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those
authorized by federal law or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In
evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings associations, the Federal Reserve Board must consider
the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the
acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
The Federal Reserve Board is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings
and loan holding company controlling savings associations in more than one state, except: (i) the approval of interstate
17
supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and (ii) the acquisition of a savings association in
another state if the laws of the state of the target savings association specifically permit such acquisitions. The states
vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Capital Requirements. The Company is subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s capital adequacy guidelines for
savings and loan holding companies (on a consolidated basis) which have historically been similar to, though less
stringent than, those of the FDIC for the Bank. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, required the Federal Reserve Board to
promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both
quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves. Consolidated
regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to the subsidiary banks apply to savings and loan holding
companies; as is the case with institutions themselves, the capital conservation buffer was phased in between 2016 and
2019. However, the Federal Reserve Board has provided a “small bank holding company” exception to its consolidated
capital requirements, and legislation and the related issuance of regulations by the Federal Reserve Board has increased
the threshold for the exception to $3.0 billion. As a result, the Company is not be subject to the capital requirement until
such time as its consolidated assets exceed $3.0 billion.
Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act also extends the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan
holding companies. The regulatory agencies must promulgate regulations implementing the “source of strength” policy
that holding companies act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital,
liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.
Dividends and Stock Repurchases. The Federal Reserve Board has the power to prohibit dividends by savings
and loan holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The Federal Reserve Board has
issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank and savings and loan holding companies, which
expresses the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the
company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that
is consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board
also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow
funds to pay dividends. Under the prompt corrective action regulations, the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank
or savings and holding company from paying any dividends if the holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as
“undercapitalized.”
Federal Reserve Board policy also provides that a holding company should inform the Federal Reserve Board
supervisory staff prior to redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the holding company
is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase or redemption would result in a net reduction, as of the end of a
quarter, in the amount of such equity instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of the quarter in which the
redemption or repurchase occurred.
Acquisition of the Company. Under the Federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the
Federal Reserve Board if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or
indirect “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings association. Under certain circumstances, a change
of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock
of the company or institution, unless the Federal Reserve Board has found that the acquisition will not result in a change
of control. Under the Change in Control Act, the Federal Reserve Board generally has 60 days from the filing of a
complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the
acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that acquires control would then be subject to
regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
Federal Securities Laws. The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and, as a result, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions
and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is intended to improve corporate responsibility,
to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect
investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. We have
18
policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and we review and document such policies,
procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these regulations.
Change in Control Regulations. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, no person, or group of persons acting
in concert, may acquire control of a savings and loan holding company such as the Company unless the Federal Reserve
Board has been given 60 days’ prior written notice and not disapproved the proposed acquisition. The Federal Reserve
Board considers several factors in evaluating a notice, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer
and competitive effects. Control, as defined under the applicable regulations, means the power, directly or indirectly, to
direct the management or policies of the company or to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the
company. Acquisition of more than 10% of any class of a savings and loan holding company’s voting securities
constitutes a rebuttable presumption of control under certain circumstances, including where, as in the case of the
Company, the issuer has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
In addition, federal regulations provide that no company may acquire control of a savings and loan holding
company without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Any company that acquires such control becomes a
“savings and loan holding company” subject to registration, examination and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board.
Emerging Growth Company Status
The Company is an emerging growth company and, for so long as it continues to be an emerging growth
company, the Company may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to
other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure
obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the
requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden
parachute payments not previously approved. As an emerging growth company, the Company is not subject to
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which would require that our independent auditors review and attest
as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have also elected to use the extended transition
period to delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such
pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. Such an election is irrevocable during the period a company
is an emerging growth company. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial
statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
The Company will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of: (i) the end of the fiscal year
following the fifth anniversary of the completion of the Company’s second-step conversion and offering, which occurred
on July 12, 2021; (ii) the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion (adjusted for inflation) or
more; (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-
convertible debt securities; or (iv) the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by
non-affiliates exceeded $700 million at the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year.
Personnel
At December 31, 2021, we had 128 full-time employees and five part-time employees, none of whom are
represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Subsidiaries
The Company’s only direct subsidiary is the Bank. The Bank maintains the following subsidiaries:
New England Commercial Properties LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned
subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in October 2007 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank. New
England Commercial Properties, LLC currently owns one foreclosed property located in Pennsylvania.
NECB Financial Services Group, LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of
the Bank, was formed in the third quarter of 2012 as a complement to Harbor West Wealth Management Group to sell
life insurance and fixed rate annuities. NECB Financial Services Group, LLC is licensed in the States of New York and
Connecticut.
19
72 West Eckerson LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, was
formed in April 2015 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank and currently owns the Bank branch
locations in Spring Valley, New York and Monroe, New York.
166 Route 59 Realty LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank,
was formed in April 2021 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank and currently owns the Bank
branch located in Airmont, New York.
3 Winterton Realty LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank,
was formed in October 2021 to facilitate the purchase of real property by the Bank and currently owns the property for a
proposed Bank branch located in Bloomingburg, New York.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers are elected annually by the board of directors and serve at the board’s discretion. The
following individuals currently serve as our executive officers and will serve in the same positions following the
conversion and offering:
Name
Kenneth A. Martinek
Jose M. Collazo
Donald S. Hom
Position
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Below is information regarding our executive officer who is not also a director. Mr. Hom has held his current
position for the period indicated below. Age presented is as of December 31, 2021.
Donald S. Hom joined the Company and the Bank in 2007, serving as Chief Financial Officer since 2013. Prior
to joining the Company and the Bank, Mr. Hom served for 23 years as a bank examiner and financial analyst for a
Federal banking regulatory agency and six years as the chief executive officer of a New Jersey community bank. Age 67.
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Investing in the Company’s common stock involves risks. The investor should carefully consider the following
risk factors before deciding to make an investment decision regarding the Company’s stock. The risk factors may cause
future earnings to be lower or the financial condition to be less favorable than expected. In addition, other risks that the
Company is not aware of, or which are not believed to be material, may cause earnings to be lower, or may deteriorate
the financial condition of the Company. Consideration should also be given to the other information in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as well as in the documents incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
Risks Related to COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Economic Slowdown
The widespread outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) has, and will likely continue to adversely affect,
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic is negatively impacting economic and commercial activity and financial markets,
both globally and within the United States. In our market area, stay-at-home orders and travel restrictions — and similar
orders imposed across the United States to restrict the spread of COVID-19 — resulted in significant business and
operational disruptions, including business closures, supply chain disruptions, and mass layoffs and furloughs. Local
jurisdictions have subsequently lifted stay-at-home orders and moved to phased reopening of businesses, although
capacity restrictions and health and safety recommendations that encourage continued physical distancing and working
remotely have limited the ability of businesses to return to pre-pandemic levels of activity.
We have implemented business continuity plans and continue to provide financial services to clients, while
taking health and safety measures such as transitioning most in-person customer transactions to our drive-thru facilities,
limiting access to the interior of our facilities, frequent cleaning of our facilities, and using a remote workforce where
possible. Despite these safeguards, we may nonetheless experience business disruptions.
20
Due to the impact of COVID-19 on our borrowers, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we
granted loan deferrals of principal and interest in accordance with regulatory guidance for 196 loans totaling $190.9
million (at the time payment deferral was requested) under the CARES Act. Generally, these modifications included the
deferral of principal and interest payments for a period of three months, although interest income continued to accrue.
The extent to which COVID-19 will continue to negatively affect our business is unknown and will depend on the spread
of the virus, the overall severity of the disease, the duration of the pandemic, the actions undertaken by national, state
and local governments and health officials to contain the virus or treat its effects, the effectiveness of the COVID-19
vaccine program, and how quickly and to what extent economic conditions improve and normal business and operating
conditions resume. The longer the pandemic persists, the more material the ultimate effects are likely to be. As of
December 31, 2021, we had one loan still on deferral status in the aggregate amount of $79,000, which represented
0.01% of our loan portfolio. As of February 1, 2022, the loan was returned to normal payment status.
The continued spread of COVID-19 and the efforts to contain the virus, including travel restrictions, could,
among other things: (1) cause changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing and savings habits, which may
affect the demand for loans and other products and services we offer, as well as the creditworthiness of potential and
current borrowers; (2) cause our borrowers to be unable to meet existing payment obligations, particularly those
borrowers that may be disproportionately affected by business shut downs and travel restrictions, resulting in increases
in loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures; (3) cause the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate,
to decline in value; (4) reduce the availability and productivity of our employees; (5) require us to increase our
allowance for loan losses; (6) cause our vendors and counterparties to be unable to meet existing obligations to us;
(7) negatively impact the business and operations of third party service providers that perform critical services for our
business; (8) impede our ability to close real estate loans, if appraisers and title companies are unable to perform their
functions; (9) cause the value of our securities portfolio to decline; and/or (10) cause the net worth and liquidity of loan
guarantors to decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us. Additionally, as the result of the decline in the
Federal Reserve Board’s target federal funds rate to near 0%, the yield on our assets may continue to decline to a greater
extent than the decline in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reducing our net interest margin and spread and reducing
net income.
Any one or a combination of the above events could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Lending Activities
Our emphasis on construction lending involves risks that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
In recent years, we have shifted our loan originations to focus primarily on construction loans, while continuing
to originate a limited number of commercial and industrial loans, multifamily, mixed-use and non-residential real estate
loans. We expect this focus to continue given the needs of the communities we serve in the New York Metropolitan
Area. Our construction loan portfolio has increased to $683.8 million, net of loans-in-process of $436.9 million, or
70.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2021 from $251.0 million, net of loans-in-process of $145.8 million, or 39.8% of
total loans, at December 31, 2016. As a result, our credit risk profile may be higher than traditional community banks
that have higher concentrations of one- to four-family residential loans and other real estate-based loans.
Construction lending involves additional risks when compared to one- to four-family residential real estate
lending because funds are advanced upon the security of the project, which is of uncertain value prior to its completion.
Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed
project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total
funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. This type of lending also typically involves
higher loan principal amounts and is often concentrated with a small number of builders. These loans often involve the
disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the
ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property or obtain permanent take-out financing, rather than the ability of the
borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. For construction loans we originate, we require our borrowers to
fund an interest reserve account in advance.
21
Our portfolio of multifamily residential, mixed-use and non-residential real estate lending could expose us to
increased lending risks.
At December 31, 2021, $163.2 million, or 16.8%, of our loan portfolio consisted of multifamily, mixed-use and
non-residential real estate loans. As a result, our credit risk profile is generally higher than traditional thrift institutions
that have higher concentrations of one- to four-family residential loans.
Loans secured by multifamily and mixed-use and non-residential real estate generally expose a lender to greater
risk of non-payment and loss than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often
depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the underlying property, which can be
significantly affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the economy. For example, if the cash flows from the
borrower’s project is reduced as a result of leases not being obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan
may be impaired. In addition, such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related
borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Accordingly, an adverse development with
respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development
with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan. We seek to minimize these risks through our
underwriting policies, which require such loans to be qualified on the basis of the property’s net income and debt service
ratio; however, there is no assurance that our underwriting policies will protect us from credit-related losses.
Further, if we foreclose on a multifamily, mixed-use or non-residential real estate loan, our holding period for
the collateral may be longer than for one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because there are fewer potential
purchasers of the collateral, which can result in substantial holding costs. In addition, vacancies, deferred maintenance,
repairs and market stigma can result in prospective buyers expecting sale price concessions to offset their real or
perceived economic losses for the time it takes them to return the property to profitability.
Imposition of limits by the bank regulators on construction and multifamily, mixed-use and nonresidential real estate
lending activities could curtail our growth and adversely affect our earnings.
In 2006, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate
Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “CRE Guidance”). Although the CRE Guidance did not establish
specific lending limits, it provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure could receive increased
supervisory scrutiny where total non-owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment
buildings, investor commercial real estate, and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s
total risk-based capital, and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or
more during the preceding 36 months. Construction loans represented 349% of the Bank’s total risk-based capital at
December 31, 2021, and our multifamily, mixed-use and nonresidential real estate loan portfolio represented 83% of the
Bank’s total risk-based capital on that same date.
In December 2015, the Agencies released a new statement on prudent risk management for commercial real
estate lending (the “2015 Statement”). In the 2015 Statement, the Agencies, among other things, indicate the intent to
continue “to pay special attention” to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward. If the
FDIC, our primary federal regulator, were to impose restrictions on the amount of such loans we can hold in our
portfolio or require us to implement additional compliance measures, for reasons noted above or otherwise, our earnings
would be adversely affected as would our earnings per share.
We monitor our concentration limits with respect to our construction, multifamily, mixed-use and non-
residential real estate loans closely and have implemented various risk management practices to manage our exposure
for such loans. See “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Risk Management — Management of Credit Risk.”
Our portfolio of commercial and industrial loans may expose us to increased lending risks.
At December 31, 2021, $118.4 million, or 12.2%, of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial
loans. Commercial and industrial loans generally expose a lender to a greater risk of loss than one- to four-family
22
residential loans. Repayment of commercial and industrial loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient
income from the business to cover operating expenses and debt service. The offering will allow us to increase our loans-
to-one borrower limit, which may result in larger loans being originated. In addition, to the extent that borrowers have
more than one commercial loan outstanding, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship
could expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-
family residential real estate loan.
Further, unlike residential mortgages or multifamily, mixed-use and non-residential real estate loans,
commercial and industrial loans may be secured by collateral other than real estate, such as inventory and accounts
receivable, the value of which may be more difficult to appraise and may be more susceptible to fluctuation in value at
default. We seek to minimize the risks involved in commercial and industrial lending: by underwriting such loans on the
basis of the cash flows produced by the business; by requiring that such loans be collateralized by various business
assets, including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable, among others; and by requiring personal guarantees,
whenever possible. However, the capacity of a borrower to repay a commercial and industrial loan is substantially
dependent on the degree to which his or her business is successful. In addition, the collateral underlying such loans may
depreciate over time, may not be conducive to appraisal, or may fluctuate in value, based upon the business’ results.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our results of operations would be
negatively affected.
In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we analyze, among other things, our loss and
delinquency experience by portfolio segments, the debt service ratios and loan-to-value ratios of each segment of our
portfolio, and the effect of existing economic conditions. In addition, we make various assumptions and judgments about
the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate
and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. If the actual results are different from our
estimates, or our analyses are inaccurate, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in
our loan portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance and would decrease our net income. Our emphasis on
loan growth, as well as any future credit deterioration, will require us to increase our allowance further in the future.
In addition, our banking regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and could require us to
increase our provision for loan losses. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs resulting from
these regulatory reviews may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The geographic concentration of our loan portfolio and lending activities makes us vulnerable to a downturn in our
primary market area.
Our loan portfolio is concentrated in construction loans and multifamily, mixed-use and non-residential real
estate loans primarily located in the New York Metropolitan Area, including the Mid-Hudson Region, and the Boston
Metropolitan Area. Our construction loans are primarily located in Orange, Rockland and Sullivan Counties in New
York and Brooklyn (Kings County). The construction loans are almost exclusively located within homogeneous
communities that demonstrate significant population growth concentrated in well-defined existing, and newer
expanding, communities. Construction loans originated in Bronx County are also located in high demand, high
absorption areas.
At December 31, 2021, $640.7 million, or 93.7% of our construction loan portfolio and 65.9% of our loan
portfolio, represented loans made in high absorption areas of these five counties of New York. This may make us
vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy and real estate markets and to a decrease in new construction in these
counties. Adverse conditions in the local economy such as unemployment, recession, a catastrophic event or other
factors beyond our control could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, which could impact our net
interest income. Decreases in local real estate values caused by economic conditions, changes in tax laws or other events
could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in
the event of a foreclosure. Further, deterioration in local economic conditions could necessitate an increase in our
provision for loan losses and a resulting reduction to our earnings and capital.
23
Economic conditions could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our
products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Deteriorating economic conditions could affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and
investment securities, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Further, declines in real estate values and new
construction and elevated unemployment levels may result in higher loan delinquencies, increases in our non-performing
and classified assets and a decline in demand for our products and services. These events may cause us to incur losses
and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that we must work through the
resolution of assets, economic problems may cause us to incur losses and adversely affect our capital, liquidity, and
financial condition.
Strong competition within our market area may limit our growth and profitability.
Competition is intense within the banking and financial services industry, particularly in our New York and
Massachusetts markets. Our construction loans are primarily originated in high absorption areas within Bronx, Kings,
Orange, Rockland and Sullivan Counties in New York. Competition for constructions loans in these high absorption
areas comes from commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions operating in the Metropolitan New York area
and nationwide. Competition for construction loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial
service companies entering the commercial real estate or construction lending market, such as financial technology
companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies. We also originate non-construction loans, including
multi-family, commercial and industrial loans, throughout our primary lending markets in New York and Massachusetts.
Competition for non-construction loans comes from the numerous national, regional and local community financial
institutions operating in our market area, including a number of independent banks and credit unions, in addition to other
financial service companies, such as brokerage firms and other similar entities. In addition, we also face competition for
investors’ funds from money market funds and other corporate and government securities. Many of these competitors
have substantially greater resources, higher lending limits and offer services that we do not or cannot provide. This
competition could make it difficult for us to originate new loans and attract new deposits. While we believe that our
long-standing presence in our market areas in New York and Massachusetts, and our personal service philosophy
enhance our ability to compete favorably in attracting and retaining individual and business customers, price competition
for loans may result in originating fewer loans, or earning less on our loans and price competition for deposits may result
in a reduction of our deposit base of paying more on deposits.
Risks Related to Our Operations
Our reliance on brokered deposits, military deposits and deposits from listing services could adversely affect our
liquidity and operating results.
Among other sources of funds, we rely on brokered deposits as well as military deposits and deposits obtained
from listing services to provide funds with which to make loans and provide other liquidity needed. At December 31,
2021, brokered deposits, military deposits and deposits obtained through listing services totaled $77.2 million, or 8.3%
of total deposits, of which brokered deposits represents $44.6 million or 4.8% of total deposits.
Generally, these deposits may not be as stable as other types of deposits. In the future, these depositors may not
replace their deposits with us as they mature, or we may have to pay a higher rate of interest to keep those deposits or to
replace them with other deposits or sources of funds. Not being able to maintain or replace these deposits as they mature
could affect our liquidity. Paying higher deposit rates to maintain or replace these types of deposits could adversely
affect our net interest margin and operating results.
We face a risk of non-compliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money
laundering statutes and regulations.
The federal Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”) and other laws and regulations require
financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain effective anti-money laundering programs and file
suspicious activity and currency transaction reports as appropriate. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,
24
established by the U.S. Treasury Department to administer the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant
civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and have engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the
individual federal banking regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and
Internal Revenue Service. Federal and state bank regulators also are focused on compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and
anti-money laundering regulations. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient or the policies,
procedures and systems of the financial institutions that we may acquire in the future are deficient, we would be subject
to liability, including fines and regulatory actions such as restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and inability to
obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including acquisitions, which would
negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to maintain and implement
adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational
consequences for us.
Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, we face significant
operational risks.
We rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk
is the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or third
parties, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and
technology, breaches of our internal control systems and compliance requirements, and ineffective business continuation
and disaster recovery policies and procedures. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where
available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could
arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of non-compliance with applicable regulations, adverse
business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. A breakdown in
our internal control systems, improper operation of our systems or improper employee actions could result in material
financial loss to us, the imposition of regulatory action, and damage to our reputation.
The implementation of the Current Expected Credit Loss accounting standard could require us to increase our
allowance for credit losses and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13
replaces the incurred loss model with an expected loss model, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss
model, or CECL. ASU 2016-13. We previously elected to defer the adoption of ASU 2016-13 until December 31, 2020,
as permitted by the CARES Act, and based on legislation enacted in December 2020 which extended certain provision of
the CARES Act, we elected to extend adopting of CECL until January 1, 2023 in accordance with the recent legislation.
This standard requires earlier recognition of expected credit losses on loans and certain other instruments, compared to
the incurred loss model. The change to the CECL framework requires us to greatly increase the data we must collect and
review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses. The adoption of CECL may result in greater
volatility in the level of the allowance for credit losses, depending on various factors and assumptions applied in the
model, such as the forecasted economic conditions in the foreseeable future and loan payment behaviors. Any increase in
the allowance for credit losses, or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses,
may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Growth Strategy
The building of market share through our branch office strategy, and our ability to achieve profitability on new
branch offices, may increase our expenses and negatively affect our earnings.
We believe there are branch expansion opportunities within our primary market area and adjacent markets, and
will seek to grow our lending and deposit base by adding branches to our existing ten-branch network. There are
considerable costs involved in opening branch offices, especially in light of the capabilities needed to compete in today’s
environment. Moreover, new branch offices generally require a period of time to generate sufficient revenues to offset
their costs, especially in areas in which we do not have an established presence. Accordingly, new branch offices could
negatively impact our earnings and may do so for some period of time. Our investments in new branches, and the related
25
personnel required to operate such branches, take time to earn returns and can be expected to negatively impact our
earnings for the foreseeable future. The profitability of our expansion strategy will depend on whether the income that
we generate from the new branch offices will offset the increased expenses resulting from establishing and operating
these branch offices.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry Generally
Changes in interest rates may hurt our profits and asset values and our strategies for managing interest rate risk may
not be effective.
We are subject to significant interest rate risk as a financial institution. During the past several years, it has been
the policy of the Federal Reserve Board to maintain interest rates at historically low levels. As a result, recent market
rates on the loans we have originated and the yields on securities we have purchased have been at relatively low levels.
Accordingly, if market interest rates change, our net interest income may be adversely affected and may decrease, which
may have an adverse effect on our future profitability. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net
interest income by affecting the difference between the weighted-average yield earned on our interest-earning assets and
the weighted-average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, or interest rate spread, and the average life of our
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in interest rates also can affect: (1) our ability to originate
loans; (2) the value of our interest-earning assets and our ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets; (3) our
ability to obtain and retain deposits in competition with other available investment alternatives; and (4) the ability of our
borrowers to repay their loans, particularly adjustable or variable-rate loans. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many
factors, including government monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other
factors beyond our control.
Economic, social and political conditions or civil unrest in the United States may affect the markets in which we
operate, our customers, our ability to provide customer service, and could have a material adverse impact on our
business, results of operations, or financial condition.
Our business may be adversely affected by instability, disruption or destruction in the markets in which we
operate, regardless of cause, including war, terrorism, riot, civil insurrection or social unrest, and natural or man-made
disasters, including storm or other events beyond our control, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in the
imposition of related public health measures and travel restrictions, and civil unrest. Such events can increase levels of
political and economic unpredictability, result in property damage and business closures within in our markets and
increase the volatility of the financial markets. Any of these effects could have a material and adverse impact on our
business and results of operations. These events also pose significant risks to our personnel and to physical facilities,
transportation and operations, which could adversely affect our financial results.
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with
respect to our environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new
or additional risks.
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related
to their environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment
funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the
environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions and human rights. Increased ESG related compliance costs
could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or
investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with
certain partners, and our stock price. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of
ESG oversight and expanding mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure.
We depend on our management team to implement our business strategy and execute successful operations and we
could be harmed by the loss of their services.
We depend upon the services of the members of our senior management team who direct our strategy and
operations. Our executive officers and lending personnel possess expertise in our markets and key business relationships,
26
and the loss of any one of them could be difficult to replace. Our loss of one or more of these persons, or our inability to
hire additional qualified personnel, could impact our ability to implement our business strategy and could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability to compete in our markets.
We are a community bank and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business. The
failure to do so may adversely affect our performance.
We are a community bank and our reputation is one of the most valuable assets of our business. A key
component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to
expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market
area and contiguous areas. As such, we strive to conduct our business in an honorable manner that enhances our
reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an
integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers
and communities. If our reputation is negatively affected by the actions of our employees, by our inability to conduct our
operations in a manner that is appealing to current or prospective customers or otherwise, our business and operating
results may be materially adversely affected.
We are dependent on our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party service providers;
systems failures, interruptions and cybersecurity breaches could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business is dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and
telecommunications systems and third-party service providers. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-
party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations.
Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems,
we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or
experience interruptions. If significant, sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could compromise our
ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, and/or subject us to additional
regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our third-party service providers may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, phishing
schemes and other security breaches. We likely will expend additional resources to protect against the threat of such
security breaches and computer viruses, or to alleviate problems caused by such security breaches or viruses. To the
extent that the activities of our third-party service providers or the activities of our customers involve the storage and
transmission of confidential information, security breaches and viruses could expose us to claims, regulatory scrutiny,
litigation costs and other possible liabilities.
Security breaches and cybersecurity threats could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which
would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business
information and that of our customers, suppliers and business partners, as well as personally identifiable information
about our customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical
to our operations and business strategy. We, our customers, and other financial institutions with which we interact, are
subject to ongoing, continuous attempts to penetrate key systems by individual hackers, organized criminals, and in
some cases, state-sponsored organizations. While we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the
impact of cyber-attacks, there can be no assurance that such events will not occur or will be adequately addressed if they
do. In addition, we also outsource certain cybersecurity functions, such as penetration testing, to third party service
providers, and the failure of these service providers to adequately perform such functions could increase our exposure to
security breaches and cybersecurity threats. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure
may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other malicious code and
cyber-attacks that could have an impact on information security. Any such breach or attacks could compromise our
networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such unauthorized
access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that
protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties; disrupt our operations and the services we provide
27
to customers; damage our reputation; and cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, all of which could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We must keep pace with technological change to remain competitive.
Financial products and services have become increasingly technology-driven. Our ability to meet the needs of
our customers competitively, and in a cost-efficient manner, is dependent on the ability to keep pace with technological
advances and to invest in new technology as it becomes available, as well as related essential personnel. In addition,
technology has lowered barriers to entry into the financial services market and made it possible for financial technology
companies and other non-bank entities to offer financial products and services traditionally provided by banks. The
ability to keep pace with technological change is important, and the failure to do so, due to cost, proficiency or
otherwise, could have a material adverse impact on our business and therefore on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Acts of terrorism and other external events could impact our business.
Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats aimed at compromising operating
and communication systems. Such events could cause significant damage, impact the stability of our facilities and result
in additional expenses, impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, reduce the value of collateral securing
repayment of our loans, and result in the loss of revenue. The occurrence of any such event could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition.
Regulation of the financial services industry is intense, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and
regulations.
The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the New York State
Department of Financial Services. In addition, the Company is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and
examination by the Federal Reserve Board and the New York State Department of Financial Services. Such regulation,
supervision and examination govern the activities in which we may engage, and are intended primarily for the protection
of the deposit insurance fund and the Bank’s depositors and not for the protection of our stockholders. Federal and state
regulatory agencies have the ability to take supervisory actions against financial institutions that have experienced
increased loan losses and exhibit underwriting or other compliance weaknesses. These actions include the entering into
of formal or informal written agreements and cease and desist orders that may place certain limitations on their
operations. If we were to become subject to a regulatory action, such action could negatively impact our ability to
execute our business plan, and result in operational restrictions, as well as our ability to grow, pay dividends, repurchase
stock or engage in mergers and acquisitions. See “Item 1: Business — Regulation and Supervision — Bank Regulation —
Capital Requirements” for a discussion of regulatory capital requirements.
We are an emerging growth company, and any decision on our part to comply only with certain reduced reporting
and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our common stock less attractive
to investors.
The Company is an emerging growth company and, for so long as it continues to be an emerging growth
company, the Company may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to
other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, but not limited to, reduced disclosure
obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the
requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden
parachute payments not previously approved. As an emerging growth company, the Company also is not subject to
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which would require that its independent auditors review and attest
as to the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. We have also elected to use the extended transition
period to delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such
pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be
comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
Investors may find our common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our
28
common stock less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading
market for our common stock and the price of our common stock may be more volatile.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
At December 31, 2021, we conducted business through our administrative headquarters located in White Plains,
New York and through our ten branch offices located in Bronx, New York, Rockland, Orange and Westchester Counties
in New York and Essex, Middlesex and Norfolk Counties in Massachusetts and three loan production offices located in
White Plains and New City, New York and Danvers, Massachusetts. We also have a wealth management office in
Westport, Connecticut. At December 31, 2021, we leased six of our offices, and the total net book value of our land,
buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment was $23.9 million.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company and the Bank are involved in routine legal proceedings in the ordinary course
of business. At December 31, 2021, such routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be
immaterial to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
29
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The common stock of the Company is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “NECB.”
Holders
The number of shareholders of record of the Company at March 30, 2022 was 342.
Dividends
The Company has historically paid a quarterly cash dividend to stockholders and, since the completion of its
second-step conversion on July 12, 2021, has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.06 per share. The Company
presently intends to continue to pay regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis. However, in determining the amount of
any future dividends, the board of directors will take into account the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations, tax considerations, capital requirements and alternative uses for capital, industry standards, and economic
conditions. The Company cannot guarantee that it will pay continue to pay dividends or that, if paid, it will not reduce or
eliminate dividends in the future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
None.
Share Repurchases
Under current federal regulations, subject to limited exceptions, the Company may not repurchase shares of our
common stock during the first year following the completion of its second-step conversion offering, which was
completed on July 12, 2021. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during the quarter or
fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
ITEM 6.
[RESERVED]
ITEM 7.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
This discussion and analysis reflects our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data,
and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information in
this section has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company that appear beginning
on page F-1 of this report.
Executive Summary
Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans, investment securities,
mortgage-backed securities and other interest-earning assets (primarily cash and cash equivalents), and the interest we
pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, consisting of money market accounts, statement savings accounts, individual
retirement accounts and certificates of deposit. Our results of operations also are affected by our provisions for loan
losses, non-interest income and non-interest expense. Non-interest income currently consists primarily of loan fees,
service charges, and earnings on bank owned life insurance. Non-interest expense currently consists primarily of salaries
and employee benefits, deposit insurance premiums, directors’ fees, occupancy and equipment, data processing and
30
professional fees. Our results of operations also may be affected significantly by general and local economic and
competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
Business Strategy
Growing our assets with a continued focus on the origination of construction loans.
At December 31, 2021, $640.7 million, or 65.9%, of our total loan portfolio, net of loans in process, consisted
of construction loans primarily located in high absorption areas in the New York Metropolitan Area. There continues to
be a significant need for construction financing within the high absorption, homogeneous communities served by the
Bank and we intend to continue to support the growth of these communities through the financing of condominium and
apartment construction loans within the communities.
Maintaining strong asset quality and managing credit risk.
Strong asset quality is a key to the long-term financial success of any financial institution. We have been
successful in maintaining strong asset quality in recent years. Our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was
0.16%, 0.58% and 0.64% at December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. We attribute this credit quality to a
conservative credit culture and an effective credit risk management environment. We have an experienced team of credit
professionals, well-defined and implemented credit policies and procedures, what we believe to be conservative loan
underwriting criteria, and active credit monitoring policies and procedures. Our senior management team also spends
substantial time conducting construction site visits and visiting regularly with community leaders and borrowers in our
high absorption communities, which enables us to understand the needs of our communities and to stay informed as to
matters affecting those communities.
Continuing to grow our non-interest bearing deposit accounts through the maintenance of low customer fees
and charges.
We believe that as a community bank we should maintain the fees and charges we charge our customers as low
as possible. By doing so, we have been able to attract and retain food service and other businesses as customers of the
Bank and at the same time increase the amount of our non-interest bearing business accounts. We intend to continue this
strategy following the conversion.
Expanding our franchise through de novo branching or branch acquisitions.
As the communities we serve continue to grow and expand into new areas, we believe there will be branch
expansion opportunities within our market area and in the newly developing communities expanding outward from
existing high absorption, homogeneous communities where our branches are currently located. To this end, we currently
expect to open a new branch office in Sullivan County, New York during the second quarter of 2022. We intend to
explore additional opportunities as they arise to expand our branch network.
Expanding our employee base, infrastructure and technology, as necessary, to support future growth.
We have already made significant investments in our infrastructure, technology and employee base to support
the growth in our construction portfolio and the increased compliance responsibilities due to such growth, including
experienced Bank Secrecy Act professionals. The additional capital being raised in the offering will provide us with
additional resources to attract and retain the necessary talent and continue to enhance our infrastructure and technology
to support our growth following the conversion.
Implement a stockholder-focused strategy for management of our capital.
We recognize that a strong capital position is essential to achieving our long-term objective of building
stockholder value, and we believe that our capital position will support our future growth and expansion, and will give us
flexibility to pursue other capital management strategies to enhance stockholder value.
31
Critical Accounting Policies
In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we have adopted various accounting policies that
govern the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and to general practices within the
banking industry. Our significant accounting policies are described in note one to the consolidated financial statements
included in this report.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on
the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies, which are discussed below, to
be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other
factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these judgments and
estimates under different conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying values of our
assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We consider the allowance for loan losses to be a critical accounting policy. The allowance for loan losses
represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the statement of financial condition date
and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and
decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan
losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans
receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal
balance is highly unlikely.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be
reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is
based on our past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current
economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates
that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of general reserves. If an impairment is identified, we charge off the impaired portion
immediately. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and
the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis,
taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the
delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment records, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the
principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis.
The general component of the allowance calculation is also based on the loss factors that reflect our historical
charge-off experience adjusted for current economic conditions applied to loan groups with similar characteristics or
classifications in the current portfolio. To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future
capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, we have a proprietary structured loan rating process which allows for a
periodic review of our loan portfolio and the early identification of potential impaired loans. These proprietary systems,
depending on the type of loan, take into consideration factors such as project location, loan duration, loan to value or
loan to cost, property condition, borrower experience, guarantor strength, tenant concentration, projected debt-service
coverage, absorption rate, sponsor’s experience, and as well as other factors.
Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if we grant such borrowers
concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a
troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated
32
maturity date at a below market rate. Adversely classified, non-accrual troubled debt restructurings may be returned to
accrued status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after
modification. All troubled debt restructured loans are classified as impaired.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326):
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss model with an
expected loss model, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss model, or CECL, ASU 2016-13. We
previously elected to defer the adoption of ASU 2016-13 until December 31, 2020. As permitted by the CARES Act, and
based on legislation enacted in December 2020 which extended certain provision of the CARES Act, we elected to
extend the adoption of CECL until January 1, 2023 in accordance with the recent legislation. This standard requires
earlier recognition of expected credit losses on loans and certain other instruments, compared to the incurred loss model.
Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the allowance for
loan losses is appropriate as of December 31, 2021.
Balance Sheet Analysis
General
Total assets increased by $256.8 million, or 26.5%, to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2021, from $968.2 million
at December 31, 2020. The increase in assets was primarily due to increases in net loans of $148.4 million, cash and
cash equivalents of $83.1 million, investment securities held-to-maturity of $10.5 million, investment in equity securities
of $9.6 million, and premises and equipment of $5.2 million.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $83.1 million, or 120.1%, to $152.3 million at December 31, 2021 from
$69.2 million at December 31, 2020. The increase in cash was primarily attributable to an increase in deposits of $155.5
million coupled with an increase in stockholders’ equity primarily due to the completion of the second-step conversion
offering that increased stockholders’ equity by $88.4 million, net of conversion costs. These sources of funds were
deployed via an increase in loans of $148.4 million, an increase in investment securities held-to-maturity of $10.5
million, an increase in equity securities of $9.6 million, an increase in property and equipment of $5.2 million due
primarily to the purchase of property for a new branch office, and cash dividends of $2.3 million.
Equity securities increased by $9.6 million, or 93.0%, to $19.9 million at December 31, 2021 from $10.3
million at December 31, 2020. The increase in equity securities was primarily attributable to the purchase of equity
securities totaling $10.0 million, partially offset by market depreciation of $389,000.
Securities held-to-maturity increased by $10.5 million, or 142.2%, to $17.9 million at December 31, 2021 from
$7.4 million at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to purchases of investment securities totaling $15.3
million, partially offset by maturities and pay-downs of $4.8 million.
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased by $148.4 million, or 18.1%, to $968.1 million at
December 31, 2021 from $819.7 million at December 31, 2020. The increase in loans, net of the allowance for loan
losses, was primarily due to loan originations of $727.3 million, consisting primarily of $603.4 million in construction
loans with respect to which approximately 36.8% of the funds were disbursed at loan closings and the remaining funds
to be disbursed over the terms of the construction loans.
Loan originations resulted in a net increase of $138.0 million in construction loans, $27.8 million in commercial
and industrial loans, $1.3 million in mixed-use loans, and $1.0 million in one- to four-family loans. The increases in our
loan portfolio were partially offset by decreases in non-residential loans of $13.7 million and multi-family loans of $6.1
million, coupled with normal pay-downs and principal reductions.
Premises and equipment increased by $5.2 million, or 28.0%, to $23.9 million at December 31, 2021 from
$18.7 million at December 31, 2020 due to the acquisition of property for a new branch site located in Monsey, New
York.
Foreclosed real estate was $2.0 million at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
33
Right of use assets — operating decreased by $530,000, or 17.1%, to $2.6 million at December 31, 2021 from
$3.1 million at December 31, 2020, primarily due to amortization.
Other assets decreased by $377,000, or 7.5%, to $4.7 million at December 31, 2021 from $5.1 million at
December 31, 2020 due to a decrease in tax assets of $708,000 and a decrease in suspense accounts of $55,000, partially
offset by an increase in prepaid expense of $365,000.
Total deposits increased by $155.5 million, or 20.1%, to $927.2 million at December 31, 2021 from
$771.7 million at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in non-interest bearing demand
deposits of $109.5 million, or 49.5%, an increase in savings account balances of $83.2 million, or 81.8%, and an increase
in NOW/money market accounts of $17.5 million, or 17.3%, from December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease in certificates of deposit of $54.7 million, or 15.7%, from December 31,
2020 to December 31, 2021.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $28.0 million at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance decreased by $374,000, or 16.6%, to $1.9 million at
December 31, 2021 from $2.3 million at December 31, 2020 due primarily to the reduction in the commercial real estate
loan portfolio.
Lease liability – operating decreased by $511,000, or 16.4%, to $2.6 million at December 31, 2021 from $3.1
million at December 31, 2020, primarily due to amortization.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses increased by $4.7 million, or 52.9%, to $13.5 million at December 31,
2021 from $8.8 million at December 31, 2020 due primarily to an increase in suspense accounts for loan closings of $2.7
million, an increase in deferred compensation of $496,000, an increase in dividend declared but not paid of $782,000,
and an increase in accrued expenses of $692,000.
Stockholders’ equity increased by $97.6 million, or 63.4% to $251.4 million at December 31, 2021, from
$153.8 million at December 31, 2020. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily a result of the completion of
the second-step conversion offering which increased stockholders’ equity by $88.4 million, net of conversion costs,
coupled with a $7.0 million from the retirement of treasury shares, offset by the $7.8 million cost related to the
implementation of an employee stock ownership plan in connection with the second-step conversion.
The increase in stockholders’ equity was also due to net income of $11.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2021 and a reduction of $931,000 in unearned employee stock ownership plan shares, partially offset by
dividends paid/declared of $2.9 million and $46,000 in other comprehensive income.
Loans
Our loan portfolio consists primarily of construction loans, commercial and industrial loans, multifamily and
mixed-use residential real estate loans and non-residential real estate loans. We also have a limited amount of one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, which we no longer originate, and consumer loans, which we originate on a very
limited basis.
34
The following table shows the loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
2021
2020
Amount
Percent Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Percent
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred loan costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
7,189
84,425
28,744
120,358
50,016
683,830
118,378
269
972,851
(5,242)
484
$ 968,093
0.74
8.68
2.95
12.37
5.14
70.29
12.17
0.03
$ 6,170
90,506
30,508
127,184
60,665
545,788
90,577
494
100.00 % 824,708
(5,088)
113
$ 819,733
0.75 %
10.97
3.70
15.42
7.36
66.18
10.98
0.06
100.00 %
Loan Maturity. The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2021 regarding the dollar
amount of loan principal repayments becoming due during the periods indicated. The tables do not include any estimate
of prepayments which significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience
to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are
reported as due in one year or less.
December 31, 2021
Amounts due in:
One- to
Four-
Family
Multi-
Family
Mixed-
Use
Non-
Residential
Real
Estate
Commercial
Total
Construction Industrial Consumer Loans
and
(Dollars in thousands)
One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 1-5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 5-15 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
More than 15 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
—
2,304
1,191
3,694
7,189
$
$
9,498
27,642
43,255
4,030
84,425
$
$
1,030
10,867
15,803
1,044
28,744
$
$
12,787
21,238
15,858
133
50,016
$
$
$
406,854
266,456
10,520
—
$
683,830
90,993
24,717
2,668
—
118,378
$
$
258
11
—
—
269
$ 521,420
353,235
89,295
8,901
$ 972,851
The following table sets forth all loans at December 31, 2021 that are due after December 31, 2022 and have
either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates:
Floating or
Total at
Fixed Rates Adjustable Rates December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3,628
22,810
4,233
12,426
2,663
4,298
11
$ 50,069
$
$
3,561 $
52,117
23,481
24,803
274,313
23,087
—
401,362 $
7,189
74,927
27,714
37,229
276,976
27,385
11
451,431
35
Securities
Our investment portfolio consists primarily of mutual funds, residential mortgage-backed securities issued by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae primarily with stated final maturities of 10 years or more, and municipal
securities with maturities of one year or more.
The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities at
December 31, 2021. Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are presented on a tax equivalent basis using a
combined federal and state marginal rate of 23.6%. Certain securities have adjustable interest rates and will
reprice monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually within the various maturity ranges. Equity securities are not
included in the table based on lack of a maturity date. The table presents contractual maturities for mortgage-backed
securities and does not reflect repricing or the effect of prepayments.
Due within One Year
Five Years
Ten Years
Due after Ten Years
Total
Due after One but within Due after Five but within
December 31, 2021
Weighted
Carrying Average Carrying
Value
Yield
Value
Weighted
Average Carrying
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
Average Carrying Average Carrying Average
Yield
Value
Value
Yield
Yield
Value
Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed securities . $
Total available-for-sale . . . . $
—
—
— % $
— % $
Securities held-to-maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities . $
U.S. agency collateralized
mortgage obligations . . . . . .
Municipal bonds . . . . . . . . .
Total held-to-maturity . . . . . $
Total investment securities . . . . . $
1
2.11 % $
537
538
538
—
1.33
1.33 % $
1.33 % $
1
1
18
—
1,761
1,779
1,780
2.29 % $
2.29 % $
2.27 % $
—
1.36
1.37 % $
1.37 % $
—
—
12
—
1,640
1,652
1,652
— % $
— % $
—
—
— % $
— % $
1
1
2.29 %
2.29 %
1.90 % $ 4,379
1.85 % $ 4,410
1.86 %
3,453
—
1.45
6,079
1.45 % $ 13,911
1.45 % $ 13,911
3,453
1.60
1.45
10,017
1.61 % $ 17,880
1.61 % $ 17,881
1.60
1.43
1.57 %
1.57 %
Deposits
Deposits are a major source of our funds for lending and other investment purposes, and our deposits are
provided primarily by individuals within our market area. In addition, we rely on brokered, listing and military deposits,
which represent a viable and cost effective addition to our deposit gathering and maintenance strategy, often at a lower
“all-in” cost when compared to our retail branch network. Use of these types of deposits allows us to match the maturity
of these deposits to the term of our construction loans. The following table sets forth the deposits as a percentage of total
deposits for the dates indicated:
2021
Average
Outstanding
Balance
Percent
At December 31,
Average
2020
Average Outstanding
Average
Rate
Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
Percent
Rate
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW and money market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 260,529
114,940
375,469
108,877
316,690
$ 801,036
22.97%
—
— $ 172,508
32.52%
13.90% 0.50%
104,390
14.35% 0.53%
36.86% 0.16%
276,898
46.87% 0.14%
13.54% 0.33%
101,738
13.59% 0.63%
39.54% 0.97%
49.59% 1.35%
372,535
100.00% 0.50% $ 751,171 100.00% 0.72%
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the aggregate amount of uninsured deposits (deposits in amounts greater
than or equal to $250,000, which is the maximum amount for federal deposit insurance) was $548.2 million and $381.9
million, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, the aggregate amount of all our uninsured certificates of
deposit was $134.7 million. We have no deposits that are uninsured for any reason other than being in excess of the
maximum amount for federal deposit insurance. The following table sets forth the portion of the Bank’s certificates of
36
deposit, by account, that are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit, by remaining time until maturity, as of December 31,
2021:
Maturity Period:
Three months or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Over three through six months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Over six through twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Over twelve months . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
7,830
31,309
33,020
62,574
134,733
At
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
Average Balance Sheets
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information
for the years indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial. All
average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances.
The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to
interest income or interest expense. Deferred loan fees totaled $484,000 and $113,000 for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020, respectively. Loan balances exclude loans held for sale.
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
Average
Average
Outstanding
Average
Interest Yield/Rate Balance
Interest Yield/Rate
Average
Outstanding
Balance
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for Loan Losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings and club accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other . . . . . . . .
Total interest-bearing liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest rate spread (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest margin (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net interest-earning assets (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
866,518
23,026
1,576
91,999
983,119
(5,154)
72,855
$ 1,050,820
$
114,940
108,877
316,690
540,507
28,000
568,507
260,529
24,310
853,346
197,474
$ 1,050,820
$
414,612
172.93 %
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 47,898
320
71
115
48,404
$
696
328
3,335
4,359
742
5.53 % $
1.39
4.51
0.13
4.92
$
0.61 % $
0.30
1.05
0.81
2.65
$ 5,101
0.90
$
$ 48,202
333
82
360
48,977
$
768
626
7,860
9,254
723
$ 9,977
797,735
18,705
1,559
58,438
876,437
(4,965)
67,494
938,966
104,390
101,738
372,535
578,663
26,811
605,474
172,508
12,595
790,577
148,389
938,966
$ 43,303
$ 39,000
4.02 %
4.40 %
$
270,963
144.75 %
6.04 %
1.78
5.26
0.62
5.59
0.74 %
0.62
2.11
1.60
2.70
1.65
3.94 %
4.45 %
(1) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of
interest-bearing liabilities.
37
(2) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate
column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume
column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total
column represents the sum of the prior columns. or purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume,
which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to
volume.
Year Ended 12/31/2021
Compared to
Year Ended 12/31/2020
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Volume
Interest income:
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other interest-earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense:
Interest bearing demand deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
Borrowed money . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
3,978 $
79
138
4,195 $
(4,282) $
(103)
(383)
(4,768) $
(304)
(24)
(245)
(573)
73 $
41
(1,042)
32
(896)
5,091 $
(145) $
(339)
(3,483)
(13)
(3,980)
(788) $
(72)
(298)
(4,525)
19
(4,876)
4,303
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Financial Highlights
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $11.9 million compared to net income of $12.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was lower than the year
ended December 31, 2020 primarily due to an increase in provision for loan losses expense, an increase in non-interest
expenses, a decrease in other income, and an increase in income tax expense. These were partially offset by an increase
in net interest income.
38
Summary Income Statements
The following table sets forth the income summary for the periods indicated:
Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return on average equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Interest Income
Year Ended December 31,
Change Fiscal 2021/2020
2021
2020
$
%
$ 43,303
3,610
2,354
26,473
3,669
$ 11,905
(Dollars in thousands)
4,303
$ 39,000 $
2,796
814
(159)
2,513
1,385
25,088
387
3,282
(424)
$ 12,329 $
1.13 %
6.03 %
1.31 %
8.31 %
11.03 %
343.49 %
(6.33)%
5.52 %
11.79 %
(3.44)%
Net interest income totaled $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $39.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in net interest income of $4.3 million, or 11.0%, was primarily due
to a decrease in interest expense that exceeded a decrease in interest income in a manner consistent with the decrease in
interest rates during the third and fourth quarters of 2019 coupled with an additional 150 basis point cut in interest rates
in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this regard, our cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased
much greater than our yield on interest earning assets as our interest bearing liabilities repriced much faster to lower
rates than our yield on interest earning assets.
Interest and dividend income decreased by $573,000, or 1.2%, due to a decrease in the yield on interest earning
assets by 67 basis points from 5.59% for the year ended December 31, 2020 to 4.92% for the year ended December 31,
2021, partially offset by an increase in the average interest earning assets of $106.7 million, or 12.2%, from $876.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $983.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Interest expense decreased by $4.9 million, or 48.9%, due to a decrease in average interest bearing liabilities of
$37.0 million, or 6.1%, from $605.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $568.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2021 and a decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities by 75 basis points from 1.65% to 0.90%. The
decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities was also partially due to a shift to non-interest bearing demand deposits
from interest bearing certificates of deposits as the average balances of non-interest bearing demand deposits increased
by $88.0 million, or 51.0%, from $172.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $260.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2021 and the average balances of certificates of deposits decreased by $55.8 million, or 15.0% from
$372.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $316.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net
interest margin decreased by 5 basis points, or 1.0%, during the year ended December 31, 2021 to 4.40% compared to
4.45% at December 31, 2020.
Provision for Loan Losses. A provision for loan losses of $3.6 million was recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2021 as compared to $814,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. During 2021, we charged-off a
total of $3.6 million against one non-performing non-residential mortgage loan and various unpaid overdrafts in our
demand deposit accounts. During 2020, we charged-off a total of $364,000 against one non-performing non-residential
mortgage loan, one non-performing commercial and industrial loan, and various unpaid overdrafts in our demand deposit
accounts. We recorded recoveries of $160,000 and $27,000 during the years ended December 31, 2021 and
December 31, 2020, respectively.
The increase in provision level was primarily attributed to the charge-off of $3.6 million during the quarter
ended September 30, 2021 relating to a non-residential bridge loan secured by real estate with a balance of $3.6 million.
The loan is secured by commercial real estate located in Greenwich, Connecticut and guaranteed by the two borrowers.
The loan was originated in 2016 as a two-year bridge loan and, upon the borrower’s failure to satisfy the loan at the
39
maturity date, the loan was accelerated and a foreclosure action was instituted. The loan remains in foreclosure but is
subject to Connecticut’s continuing foreclosure backlog. The property securing the loan is subject to a parking easement
and based on a recently updated appraisal showing the property’s value with the parking easement to be zero, the
Company determined to write off the $3.6 million loan as a non-cash charge against the allowance for loan losses.
The Company is aggressively seeking recovery of all amounts due from the personal guarantors of the loan.
However, the recovery process is uncertain and may take an extended period of time to resolve this matter. In the event
the Company is successful against the guarantors, any recovery received would be added back to the allowance for loan
losses and an analysis would be performed at that time to determine the appropriateness of the recovery into income.
The provision recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to the perceived
potential credit risk associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, although no specific or probable losses were identified at
that time. Although the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting recession has impacted the local economy, we have not
experienced any significant deterioration of our borrowers’ ability to keep current in accordance with the terms of their
obligations. Based on a review of the loans that were in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2021, management believes
that the allowance is maintained at a level that represents its best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio that
were both probable and reasonably estimable.
Management uses available information to establish the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.
Future additions or reductions to the allowance may be necessary based on estimates that are susceptible to change as a
result of changes in economic conditions and other factors. As a result, our allowance for loan losses may not be
sufficient to cover actual loan losses, and future provisions for loan losses could materially adversely affect our
operating results. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically
review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on
their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Non-Interest Income
The following table sets forth a summary of non-interest income for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Other loan fees and service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on disposition of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment advisory fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized (loss) gain on equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
1,568 $
7
600
514
(389)
54
2,354 $
1,045
(61)
609
425
288
207
2,513
The decrease in total other income was primarily due to an unrealized loss of $389,000 in our equity securities
in 2021 compared to an unrealized gain of $288,000 in 2020, a decrease of $153,000 in other non-interest income, and a
decrease of $9,000 in bank owned life insurance income. These were partially offset by an increase of $523,000 in other
loan fees and service charges, an increase of $89,000 in investment advisory fees, and a net gain of $7,000 on the sale of
fixed assets in 2021 compared to a net loss of $61,000 on the sale of fixed assets in 2020.
The unrealized loss of $389,000 in our equity securities was primarily due to an increase in the medium to long-
term interest rates. The decrease in other non-interest income was primarily due to a gain of $125,000 in the quarter
ended March 31, 2020 on a foreclosure sale of a delinquent mortgage loan and a decrease in miscellaneous income from
our branch operations.
The increase in other loan fees and service charges was due to increases of $240,000 in ATM and debit card
usage fees, $167,000 in loan servicing fees, and $137,000 in loan fees, partially offset by decreases of $15,000 in safe
deposit fees and $6,000 in deposit accounts fees.
40
The increase in investment advisory fees was due to an increase in fees generated by an increase in assets under
management of Harbor West and an increase in commission income from Harbor West.
Non-Interest Expense
The following table sets forth an analysis of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outside data processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment loss on goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2021
(Dollars in thousands)
14,996 $
2,115
993
1,652
139
—
93
6,485
26,473 $
13,809
1,932
917
1,771
168
98
313
6,080
25,088
Non-interest expense increased by $1.4 million, or 5.5%, to $26.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2021 from $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $1.2
million in salaries and employee benefits, $405,000 in other operating expense, $183,000 in occupancy expense, and
$76,000 in equipment expense, partially offset by decreases of $220,000 in real estate owned expense, $119,000 in
outside data processing expense, $98,000 in impairment loss on goodwill, and $29,000 in advertising expense.
Salaries and employee benefits increased by $1.2 million, or 8.6%, to $15.0 million in 2021 from $13.8 million
in 2020. The was due to the payment of bonuses to branch personnel in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, an
increase in bonuses paid to loan production personnel, and an increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees
to 131 as of December 31, 2021 from 123 as of December 31, 2020. The increase in bonuses paid to loan production
personnel was due to an increase in the construction loan portfolio. The increase in full-time equivalent employees was
due to our efforts to expand our operations.
Other non-interest expense increased by $405,000, or 6.7%, to $6.5 million in 2021 from $6.1 million in 2020
due mainly to increases of $280,000 in consulting services, $137,000 in audit and accounting fees, $108,000 in service
contracts expense, $27,000 in telephone expense, $24,000 in recruitment expenses related to the hiring of additional
personnel, $20,000 in directors compensation, and $1,000 in office supplies, partially offset by decreases of $100,000 in
miscellaneous other non-interest expense, $52,000 in legal fees, $26,000 in insurance expense, and $14,000 in directors,
officers and employee expense. The decrease of $100,000 in miscellaneous other non-interest expense was due to a
decrease of $218,000 in FDIC insurance premiums, partially offset by increases of $64,000 in dues and subscriptions
expenses and $57,000 in various service charges.
Occupancy expense increased by $183,000, or 9.5%, to $2.1 million in 2021 from $1.9 million in 2020
primarily as a result of the cost of operating additional office space to accommodate our expansion. Equipment expense
increased by $76,000, or 8.3%, to $993,000 in 2021 from $917,000 in 2020 due to an increase in the purchases of
additional equipment.
Real estate owned expense decreased by $220,000, or 70.3%, to $93,000 in 2021 from $313,000 in 2020 due to
the write down of $169,000 in the value of the one foreclosed property in 2020 and a reduction in operating expenses to
maintain the one real estate owned property in 2021.
Outside data processing expense decreased by $119,000, or 6.7%, to $1.7 million in 2021 from $1.8 million in
2020 due to additional services required in 2020 to enable the company to expand and additional expense incurred to
allow employees to work remotely.
41
There was no goodwill impairment expense of in 2021 compared to a goodwill impairment expense of $98,000
in 2020. The goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Harbor West Financial Planning Wealth
Management Group in 2007, which is operated as a division of the Bank. The goodwill impairment in 2020 was caused
primarily by the expected decrease in revenue from this division due to a decrease in clients and the resulting decrease in
assets under management.
Advertising expense decreased by $29,000, or 17.3%, to $139,000 in 2021 from $168,000 in 2020 as we
reduced advertising and promotional products in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Income Taxes. The Company recorded income tax expense of $3.7 million and $3.3 million for the years
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had
approximately $711,000 in tax exempt income, compared to approximately $671,000 in tax exempt income for the year
ended December 31, 2020. The Company’s effective income tax rates were 23.6% and 21.0% for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Risk Management
Overview
Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk
exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the
principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as
a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the
values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for at fair value. Other risks that
we face are operational risk, liquidity risk and reputation risk. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, regulatory
compliance, processing errors, technology, and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund
obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true
or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
Management of Credit Risk
The objective of our credit risk management strategy is to quantify and manage credit risk and to limit the risk
of loss resulting from an individual customer default. Our credit risk management strategy focuses on conservatism, an
excellent knowledge of the communities we lend in, and significant levels of monitoring. Our lending practices include
conservative exposure limits and underwriting, extensive documentation and collection standards. Our credit risk
management strategy also emphasizes diversification at the borrower level as well as regular credit examinations,
continuous site visits by executive management and management reviews of large credit exposures and credits that
might experience deterioration of credit quality.
As part of its risk management process, the Bank conducts stress testing on its commercial real estate portfolio,
performs a global cash flow analysis for loans associated with multiple properties and/or guarantors and also operates a
loan review program for all real estate loans (including construction loans) with terms more than 12 months. In addition,
we track our board approved limits for each commercial real estate category on a monthly basis.
Analysis of Non-Performing, Troubled Debt Restructurings and Classified Assets.
Classified Assets. FDIC regulations and our Asset Classification Policy provide that loans and other assets
considered to be of lesser quality be classified as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered
“substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the
collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the
institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the
weaknesses inherent in those classified as “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make
“collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, “highly questionable
and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their
continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. We classify an asset as
“special mention” if the asset has a potential weakness that warrants management’s escalated level of attention. While
42
such assets are not impaired, management has concluded that if the potential weakness in the asset is not addressed, the
value of the asset may deteriorate, adversely affecting the repayment of the asset. Loans classified as impaired for
financial reporting purposes are generally those loans classified as substandard or doubtful for regulatory reporting
purposes.
An insured institution is required to establish allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by
management for loans classified as substandard or doubtful, as well as for other problem loans. General allowances
represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities,
but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured institution
classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required to charge off such amounts. An institution’s determination as to the
classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the FDIC.
The following table sets forth information with respect to our non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
At December 31,
2021
2020
(Dollars in thousands)
—
Total non-accrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Total non-performing loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,996
Total non-performing assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,996
Total non-performing loans to total loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-performing assets to total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— %
0.16 %
$
3,572
—
3,572
1,996
5,568
0.43 %
0.58 %
During the year ended December 31, 2021, non-performing assets decreased by $3.6 million, or 64.2%, to
$2.0 million from $5.6 million as of December 31, 2020. The decrease in non-performing assets was primarily due to
the previously disclosed charge-off of $3.6 million on a non-accrual, non-residential bridge loan during 2021.
We had no non-performing loans at December 31, 2021, as compared to one loan at December 31, 2020. For
the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, gross interest income of $173,000 and $236,000, respectively, would have
been recorded had the non-accrual loans at the end of the period been on accrual status throughout the period. In 2021,
we collected no interest income from a loan that was in non-accrual status in 2021 and was charge-off in 2021. In 2020,
we collected $85,000 in interest income from a loan that was in non-accrual status in 2019 and was satisfied in 2020.
From time to time, as part of our loss mitigation strategy, we may renegotiate the loan terms based on the
economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties. There were no new troubled debt restructurings
(“TDRs”) during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. TDRs may be considered to be non-
performing and if so are placed on non-accrual, except for those that have established a sufficient performance history
(generally a minimum of six consecutive months of performance) under the terms of the restructured loan.
At December 31, 2021, four loans with aggregate balances of $1.6 million were considered TDRs but were
performing in accordance with their restructured terms for the requisite period of time (generally at least six
consecutive months) to be returned to accrual status. At December 31, 2020, five loans with aggregate balances of $2.8
million were considered TDRs but were performing in accordance with their restructured terms for the requisite period
of time to be returned to accrual status.
Impaired loans at December 31, 2021 totaled $746,000 and consisted of two non-residential mortgage loans.
These two loans are performing according to their loan terms but we had charged-off $67,000 on one of the loans.
43
The following table summarizes classified and criticized assets of all portfolio types at the dates indicated:
At December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands)
Classified loans:
Substandard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Doubtful . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total classified loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special mention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total criticized loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
746
—
—
746
—
746
$
$
3,722
—
—
3,722
301
4,023
On the basis of management’s review of our assets, we had no assets classified as special mention at
December 31, 2021 compared to $301,000 classified as special mention at December 31, 2020. In addition, we
classified $746,000 as classified as substandard at December 31, 2021 compared to $3.7 million at December 31, 2020.
There were no assets classified as doubtful or loss at December 31, 2021 or 2020. The loan portfolio is reviewed on a
regular basis to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. Not all
classified assets constitute non-performing assets.
The decrease in special mention assets was due to the improvement of the borrower’s financial condition and
substantial pay down of principal balance for one loan and the satisfaction of the other loan. The decrease in
substandard assets was primarily due to the previously disclosed charge-off of $3.6 million on a non-accrual, non-
residential bridge loan during 2021 and the satisfaction of a performing, non-residential loan with a balance of $150,000
during 2021, partially offset by the addition of two non-residential mortgage loans totaling $746,000 that were classified
as impaired loans but has been performing and management decided to classified as substandard.
Delinquent Loans
The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
At December 31,
2021
Days Past Due
2020
Days Past Due
30 – 59 60 – 89 90 or more 30 – 59 60 – 89 90 or more
(In thousands)
Residential real estate loans:
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — $ — $ — $
—
—
$ — $ — $ — $
—
— $
—
— $
— $ —
—
3,572
— $ 3,572
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses
Our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level necessary to absorb loan losses which are both probable
and reasonably estimable. Management, in determining the allowance for loan losses, considers the losses inherent in its
loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of loan activities, along with the general economic and real estate
market conditions. We utilize a two-tier approach: (1) identification of impaired loans; and (2) establishment of general
valuation allowances on the remainder of our loan portfolio. We maintain a loan review system, which allows for a
periodic review of our loan portfolio and the early identification of potential impaired loans. Such system takes into
consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size of loans, type and market value of collateral and financial
condition of the borrowers. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012, we discontinued the use of specific allowances. If an
impairment is identified, we now charge off the impaired portion immediately. A loan evaluated for impairment is
considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect
all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All loans identified as impaired are evaluated
independently. We do not aggregate such loans for evaluation purposes. Loan impairment is measured based on the
44
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at
the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The interest on
these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status.
Should full collection of principal be expected, cash collected on non-accrual loans can be recognized as interest income.
The general component consists of quantitative and qualitative factors and covers non-impaired loans. The
quantitative factors are based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. This actual loss experience is
supplemented with other qualitative factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These qualitative
factors include consideration of the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Levels and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans;
Levels and trends in charge-offs and recoveries;
Trends in volume and terms of loans;
Effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards;
Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans
Other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices;
Experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;
National and local economic trends and conditions;
Industry conditions; and
Effects of changes in credit concentrations.
The allowance is increased through provisions charged against current earnings, and offset by recoveries of
previously charged-off loans. Loans which are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance.
Management uses available information to recognize probable and reasonably estimable loan losses, but future loss
provisions may be necessary based on changing economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses as of December 31,
2021 and 2020 was maintained at a level that represents management’s best estimate of losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. In addition, the FDIC and the New York State Department of Financial Services, as an integral part of their
examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses and could require us to increase our allowance
for loan losses.
Each quarter, management evaluates the total balance of the allowance for loan losses based on several factors
that are not loan specific, but are reflective of the inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This process includes, but is not
limited to, a periodic review of loan collectability in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of loan
activity, conditions that may affect the ability of the borrower to repay, underlying value of collateral, if applicable, and
economic conditions in our market areas. First, we group loans by delinquency status. All loans 90 days or more
delinquent and all loans classified as substandard or doubtful are evaluated individually, based primarily on the value of
the collateral securing the loan. Loans are segregated by type and delinquency status and a loss allowance is established
by using loss experience data and management’s judgment concerning other matters it considers significant. The
allowance is allocated to each category of loan based on the results of the above analysis.
This analysis process is inherently subjective, as it requires us to make estimates that are susceptible to
revisions as more information becomes available. Although we believe that we have established the allowance at a level
to absorb probable and estimable losses, additions may be necessary if economic or other conditions in the future differ
from the current environment.
45
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates
indicated:
2021
At December 31,
% of Allowance % of Loans in
Amount to Total
Category to Total
Loans
Amount
Allowance
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
2020
% of Allowance % of Loans in
Amount to Total Category to Total
Allowance
Loans
0.32 %
11.83
1.75
10.20
60.30
15.21
0.39
100.00 %
—
0.75 %
10.93
3.62
6.87
66.70
11.07
0.06
100.00 %
—
0.32 %
9.18
1.39
7.27
59.96
18.56
0.19
96.87 %
3.13
0.74 % $
8.68
2.95
16
602
89
5.14
70.29
12.17
0.03
519
3,068
774
20
100.00 % $ 5,088
—
—
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . $
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
481
73
Non-residential real estate
381
loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . 3,143
973
Commercial and industrial . .
10
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . .
Total general allowance . . . $ 5,078
164
Unallocated . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total allowance for loan
losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,242
100.00 %
100.00 % $ 5,088
100.00 %
100.00 %
46
The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated:
Total loans net of deferred fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average loans outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs:
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At or For the Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(Dollars in thousands)
972,851
$
866,518
824,708
797,735
5,088
$
4,611
$
$
—
(150)
—
(150)
3,591
—
—
15
3,456
—
(3)
—
(3)
56
—
256
28
337
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
3,610
5,242
$
814
5,088
Average loan outstanding:
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding
Residential real estate loans:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multifamily . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total net charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Credit Quality Ratios:
As a percentage of year-end loans, net of unearned income:
Allowance for loan loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nonaccrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nonperforming loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
5,490
84,748
28,263
118,501
52,094
602,585
93,101
237
866,518
— %
(0.18)
—
(0.13)
6.89
—
—
6.33
0.40 %
0.54 %
— %
— %
— %
— %
7,478
90,720
29,438
127,636
60,152
523,112
86,405
430
797,735
— %
—
—
(0.00)
0.09
—
0.30
6.51
0.04 %
0.62 %
0.43 %
0.43 %
142.44 %
142.44 %
The allowance for loan losses increased by $154,000 to $5.2 million at December 31, 2021 from $5.1 million at
December 31, 2020. The increase in the allowances for loan losses was due primarily to the increase in the provision for
loan losses, which reflected the increase in the charge-off levels which had an unfavorable impact on the historical loss
factors and an increase in the construction loan, commercial and industrial loan, and residential loan portfolio, partially
offset by the reduction of the non-performing asset levels and a decrease in the multifamily, mixed-use, and non-
residential mortgage loan portfolio. We had recoveries totaling $160,000 in 2021.
The increase on provision for loan loss recorded were primarily attributed to the previously disclosed charge-off
of $3.6 million in 2021 of a non-residential bridge loan secured by real estate with a balance of $3.6 million. The loan is
secured by commercial real estate located in Greenwich, Connecticut and guaranteed by the two borrowers. The loan
was originated in 2016 as a two-year bridge loan and, upon the borrower’s failure to satisfy the loan at the maturity date,
the loan was accelerated and a foreclosure action was instituted. The loan remains in foreclosure but is subject to
Connecticut’s continuing foreclosure backlog. The property securing the loan is subject to a parking easement and based
on a recently updated appraisal showing the property’s value with the parking easement to be zero, the Company has
determined to write off the $3.6 million loan as a non-cash charge against the allowance for loan losses. The Company
intends to aggressively seek recovery of all amounts due from the personal guarantors of the loan. However, the
recovery process is uncertain and might take an extended period of time to resolve this matter. In the event the
Company is successful against the guarantors, any recovery received would be added back to the allowance for loan
losses and an analysis will be performed at that time to determine the appropriateness of recognizing the recovery into
income.
Additionally the provision expenses recorded for commercial and industrial loan and construction loan
segments were primarily due to increased loan balances, and the credit provision recorded for residential real estate loan
segment was due to decreased loan balance.
The historical loss percentage factor for multifamily and mixed-use loans declined while the historical loss
percentage factor for non-residential, commercial and industrial, and consumer loans increased. The historical loss
percentage factor declined because one single loan charge off of $246,000 in 2016 for multifamily loans and one single
loan charge off of $103,000 in 2016 for mixed-use loans were out the historical loss look back period, and therefore
were not included in the historical loss rate calculation at December 31, 2021. The historical loss percentage factor for
non-residential loans increased due to decreased average loan balances over the years. The historical loss percentage
factor for commercial and industrial and consumer loans increased due to the average loan charge offs increased slightly
in recent years. Other adjustments in provision for loan loss include movements in the qualitative factors as risks in each
respective segment change.
Loans evaluated collectively totaled $971.2 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $818.2 million at
December 31, 2020. Loans evaluated individually totaled $1.6 million at December 31, 2021 compared to $6.5 million at
December 31, 2020.
Interest Rate Risk Management
Interest rate risk is defined as the exposure to current and future earnings and capital that arises from adverse
movements in interest rates. Depending on a bank’s asset/liability structure, adverse movements in interest rates could be
either rising or falling interest rates. For example, a bank with predominantly long-term fixed-rate assets and short-term
liabilities could have an adverse earnings exposure to a rising rate environment. Conversely, a short-term or variable-rate
asset base funded by longer-term liabilities could be negatively affected by falling rates. This is referred to as re-pricing
or maturity mismatch risk.
Interest rate risk also arises from changes in the slope of the yield curve (yield curve risk), from imperfect
correlations in the adjustment of rates earned and paid on different instruments with otherwise similar re-pricing
characteristics (basis risk), and from interest rate related options embedded in our assets and liabilities (option risk).
Our objective is to manage our interest rate risk by determining whether a given movement in interest rates
affects our net interest income and the market value of our portfolio equity in a positive or negative way and to execute
strategies to maintain interest rate risk within established limits. The results at December 31, 2021 indicate the level of
48
risk within the parameters of our model. Our management believes that the December 31, 2021 results indicate a profile
that reflects interest rate risk exposures in both rising and declining rate environments for both net interest income and
economic value.
Model Simulation Analysis. We view interest rate risk from two different perspectives. The traditional
accounting perspective, which defines and measures interest rate risk as the change in net interest income and earnings
caused by a change in interest rates, provides the best view of short-term interest rate risk exposure. We also view
interest rate risk from an economic perspective, which defines and measures interest rate risk as the change in the market
value of portfolio equity caused by changes in the values of assets and liabilities, which fluctuate due to changes in
interest rates. The market value of portfolio equity, also referred to as the economic value of equity, is defined as the
present value of future cash flows from existing assets, minus the present value of future cash flows from existing
liabilities.
These two perspectives give rise to income simulation and economic value simulation, each of which presents a
unique picture of our risk of any movement in interest rates. Income simulation identifies the timing and magnitude of
changes in income resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates over a short-term time horizon (usually one or
two years). Economic value simulation reflects the interest rate sensitivity of assets and liabilities in a more
comprehensive fashion, reflecting all future time periods. It can identify the quantity of interest rate risk as a function of
the changes in the economic values of assets and liabilities, and the corresponding change in the economic value of
equity of the Bank. Both types of simulation assist in identifying, measuring, monitoring and controlling interest rate risk
and are employed by management to ensure that variations in interest rate risk exposure will be maintained within policy
guidelines.
We produce these simulation reports and discuss them with our management Asset and Liability Committee on
a quarterly basis. The simulation reports compare baseline (no interest rate change) to the results of an interest rate
shock, to illustrate the specific impact of the interest rate scenario tested on income and equity. The model, which
incorporates asset and liability rate information, simulates the effect of various interest rate movements on income and
equity value. The reports identify and measure our interest rate risk exposure present in our current asset/liability
structure. Management considers both a static (current position) and dynamic (forecast changes in volume) analysis as
well as non-parallel and gradual changes in interest rates and the yield curve in assessing interest rate exposures.
If the results produce quantifiable interest rate risk exposure beyond our limits, then the testing will have served
as a monitoring mechanism to allow us to initiate asset/liability strategies designed to reduce and therefore mitigate
interest rate risk. The table below sets forth an approximation of our interest rate risk exposure. The simulation uses
projected repricing of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021. The income simulation analysis presented represents a
one-year impact of the interest scenario assuming a static balance sheet. Various assumptions are made regarding the
prepayment speed and optionality of loans, investment securities and deposits, which are based on analysis and market
information. The assumptions regarding optionality, such as prepayments of loans and the effective lives and repricing
of non-maturity deposit products, are documented periodically through evaluation of current market conditions and
historical correlations to our specific asset and liability products under varying interest rate scenarios.
Because the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on a number of assumptions,
these computations should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. While we believe such assumptions to be
reasonable, assumed prepayment rates may not approximate actual future prepayment activity on mortgage-backed
securities or agency issued collateralized obligations (secured by one- to four-family loans and multifamily loans).
Further, the computation does not reflect any actions that management may undertake in response to changes in interest
rates and assumes a constant asset base. Management periodically reviews the rate assumptions based on existing and
projected economic conditions and consults with industry experts to validate our model and simulation results.
49
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2021, the Bank’s net portfolio value, the estimated changes in
our net portfolio value and net interest income that would result from the designated instantaneous parallel changes in
market interest rates.
Change in Interest Rates (Basis Points)
+200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-100 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Twelve Month
Net Interest Income
Percent
of Change
Net Portfolio Value
Percent
Estimated NPV of Change
33.02 % $
16.49
—
(4.55)% $
292,809
282,924
271,387
269,489
7.89 %
4.25
—
(0.70)%
As of December 31, 2021, based on the scenarios above, net interest income would increase by approximately
16.49% to 33.02%, over a one-year time horizon in a rising interest rate environment. One-year net interest income
would decrease by approximately 4.55% in a declining interest rate environment over the same period.
Conversely, economic value at risk would be negatively impacted by a rise in interest rates. We have
established an interest rate floor of zero percent for measuring interest rate risk. The difference between the two results
reflects the relatively long terms of a portion of our assets which is captured by the economic value at risk but has less
impact on the one year net interest income sensitivity.
Overall, our December 31, 2021 results indicate that we are adequately positioned with an acceptable net
interest income and economic value at risk and that all interest rate risk results continue to be within our policy
guidelines.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We maintain liquid assets at levels we believe are adequate to meet our liquidity needs. We established a
liquidity ratio policy that identify three liquidity ratios consisting of (1) Cash/Deposits & Short Term Borrowings
(“Cash Liquidity”), (2) Cash & Investments/Deposits & Short Term Borrowings (“On Balance Sheet Liquidity”), and
(3) Cash & Investments & Borrowing Capacity/Deposits & Short Term Borrowings (“On Balance Sheet Liquidity &
Borrowing Capacity”) to assist in the management of our liquidity. We also establish targets of 2.0% for the Cash
Liquidity ratio, 8.0% for the On Balance Sheet Liquidity ratio, and 20.0% for the On Balance Sheet Liquidity &
Borrowing Capacity ratio.
Our Cash Liquidity ratio, On Balance Sheet Liquidity ratio, and On Balance Sheet Liquidity & Borrowing
Capacity ratio averaged 12.7%, 15.7%, and 21.7%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to
8.9%, 11.3%, and 19.9%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020. We adjust our liquidity levels to fund
deposit outflows, pay real estate taxes on real estate loans, repay our borrowings, and to fund loan commitments. We
also adjust liquidity as appropriate to meet asset and liability management objectives. However, during the existing low
interest rate environment, we have strategically allowed these metrics to fall below the minimum thresholds at times to
provide for the effective management of extension risk and other interest rate risks.
Our liquidity ratios cannot be calculated using amounts disclosed in our consolidated financial statements, as
many of the calculations involve monthly, quarterly or annual averages. To calculate our liquidity ratios, the average
liquidity base from the prior month is used as the denominator to calculate a daily liquidity ratio. The liquidity base
consists of savings account balances, certificates of deposit balances, checking and money market balances, deposit
loans and borrowings. The daily balances of these components are averaged to arrive at the liquidity base for the month,
and the daily cash balances in selected general ledger accounts are used to derive our liquidity position. A daily liquidity
ratio is calculated using the liquidity for the day divided by the prior month’s average liquidity base. At the end of
each month, a monthly liquidity position is calculated using the average liquidity position for the month divided by the
prior month’s average liquidity base. To calculate quarterly and annual liquidity ratios, we take the average liquidity for
the three- or twelve-month period, respectively, and average it.
50
Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and mortgage-backed
securities, maturities of investment securities, other short-term investments, earnings, and funds provided from
operations. While scheduled principal repayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities are a relatively predictable
source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic
conditions, and rates offered by our competition. We set the interest rates on our deposits to maintain a desired level of
total deposits. In addition, we invest excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet
lending requirements.
Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities as reported in
our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included with the Consolidated Financial Statements which begin on
page F-1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of construction loans, commercial and industrial loans,
multifamily loans, and to a lesser extent, mixed-use real estate loans and other loans. For the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020, our loan originations totaled $727.3 million and $389.7 million, respectively. Cash received from the
sales, calls, maturities and pay-downs on securities totaled $4.8 million and $2.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. We purchased $25.3 million and $189,000 in securities for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Deposit flows are generally affected by the level of interest rates we offer, the interest rates and products
offered by local competitors, and other factors. Total deposits increased by $155.5 million at December 31, 2021 due to
increases in non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings account deposits, and NOW/money market deposits, offset by
a decrease in certificates of deposits balances.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. If we require funds
beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York to provide advances. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, we are required to own capital
stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such
stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed
by, the United States), provided certain standards related to credit-worthiness have been met. We had an available
borrowing limit of $29.4 million and $49.4 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York as of December 31,
2021 and 2020, respectively. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $28.0 million at both December 31, 2021 and
2020.
In addition, we have a borrowing agreement with Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) to provide
short-term borrowings of $8.0 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020. There were no outstanding borrowings with
ACBB at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
At December 31, 2021, we had unfunded commitments on construction loans of $436.9 million, outstanding
commitments to originate loans of $174.4 million, unfunded commitments under lines of credit of $130.7 million, and
unfunded standby letters of credit of $6.9 million. At December 31, 2021, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in
less than one year totaled $189.2 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of
such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. In the event a significant
portion of our deposits are not retained by us, we will have to utilize other funding sources, such as various types of
sourced deposits, and/or Federal Home Loan Bank advances, in order to maintain our level of assets. Alternatively, we
could reduce our level of liquid assets, such as our cash and cash equivalents. In addition, the cost of such deposits may
be significantly higher or lower depending on market interest rates at the time of renewal.
The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its
operating expenses, The Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its stockholders, and interest and
principal on outstanding debt, if any. The Company’s primary source of income is dividends received from the Bank. At
December 31, 2021, the Company had liquid assets of $44.4 million.
51
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash-flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements, see note 23 in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this report.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and related notes of the have been prepared in accordance with GAAP,
which generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars
without consideration for changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary
impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and
liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on
performance than the effects of inflation.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Item 7:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.”
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The information required by this item is included herein beginning on page F-1.
52
ITEM 9.
CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISLCOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure (1) that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SEC’s rules and forms; and (2) that they are alerted in a timely manner about material information relating to the
Company required to be filed in its periodic Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
During the quarter and year ended December 31, 2021, there were no changes in the Company’s internal
controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
This annual report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over
financial reporting or an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period
established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C.
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTION THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
None.
53
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to “Item 1: Business—Executive
Officers” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to the sections captioned “Proposal 1—Election of Directors,” and
“Corporate Governance” in our definitive proxy statement for our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K (the “Proxy Statement”).
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The information required by this item with respect to any delinquent reports filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by referenced to the Proxy Statement.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that is designed to ensure that the
Company’s directors and employees meet the highest standards of ethical conduct. The Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct, which applies to all employees and directors, addresses conflicts of interest, the treatment of confidential
information, general employee conduct and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In addition, the Code
of Ethics and Business Conduct is designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, the avoidance
of conflicts of interest, full and accurate disclosure and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. A
copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available in the Investor Relations section of our website
(www.necb.com).
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Executive
Compensation” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned “Security
Ownership” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections captioned
“Proposal 1—Election of Directors,” “Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Persons
Transactions,” “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned
“Proposal 2—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.
54
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
(1) The financial statements required in response to this item are incorporated herein by reference from Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(2) All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable, or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
No. Description
Location
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of NorthEast Community
Bancorp, Inc.
3.2 Bylaws of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
4.0 Specimen Stock Certificate of NorthEast Community
Bancorp, Inc.
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982), initially filed
on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982), initially filed
on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.0 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982), initially filed
on March 8, 2021
4.1 Description of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.’s
Filed herewith
Common Stock Registered Under Section 12 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
10.1 Employment Agreement by and between NorthEast
Community Bancorp, Inc., NorthEast Community
Bank and Kenneth A. Martinek+
10.2 Employment Agreement by and between NorthEast
Community Bancorp, Inc., NorthEast Community
Bank and Jose M. Collazo+
10.3 NorthEast Community Bank Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan+
10.4 NorthEast Community Bank Directors’ Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated+
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
55
10.5 NorthEast Community Bank Outside Director
Retirement Plan+
10.6 NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc. Stock-Based
Deferred Compensation Plan+
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
10.7 Agreement by and between NorthEast Community
Bancorp, MHC, NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
and NorthEast Community Bank and Stilwell Activist
Fund, L.P., Stilwell Activist Investments, L.P.,
Stilwell Partners, L.P. and Joseph Stilwell
Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-253982),
initially filed on March 8, 2021
21.0 Subsidiaries
23.1 Consent of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C.
23.2 Consent of BDO USA, LLP
Filed herewith
Filed herewith
Filed herewith
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Filed herewith
Executive Officer
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Filed herewith
Financial Officer
32
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Filed herewith
101.0 The following materials from the Company’s Annual
Filed herewith
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2021, formatted in inline XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition,
(ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income,
(iv) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in iXBRL
Filed herewith
and contained in Exhibit 101)
+ Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
ITEM 16.
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
56
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition of NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc.,
and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated
financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether
due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. (PCAOB ID 00074)
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2022
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
White Plains, New York
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting
firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our
audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP (PCAOB ID 243)
We have served as the Company’s auditor from 2013 to 2021.
New York, New York
March 8, 2021
F-2
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
ASSETS
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-bearing deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $17,620 and $7,519, respectively) . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred loan costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in restricted stock, at cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property held for investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Right of Use Assets – Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Right of Use Assets – Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands, except share
and per share amounts)
$
8,344 $
7,613
61,578
69,191
100
10,332
2
7,382
824,708
113
(5,088)
819,733
18,675
1,595
24,691
3,838
651
1,996
1,518
3,094
363
5,060
$ 1,225,070 $ 968,221
143,925
152,269
100
19,943
1
17,880
972,851
484
(5,242)
968,093
23,907
1,569
25,291
4,283
651
1,996
1,481
2,564
359
4,683
Non-interest bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Bank advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease Liability – Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease Liability – Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
330,853 $ 221,371
550,335
596,311
771,706
927,164
2,258
1,884
28,000
28,000
3,115
2,604
460
496
8,857
13,540
814,396
973,688
F-3
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Continued)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 and $0.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares and 1,340,000 shares
authorized; none issued or outstanding, respectively ¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, $0.01 and $0.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares and 25,460,000 shares
authorized; 16,377,936 shares and 17,721,500 shares issued; and 16,377,936 shares
and 16,340,779 shares outstanding, respectively¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock – at cost, 0 and 1,380,721 shares, respectively¹. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands, except share
and per share amounts)
—
—
$
$
164
145,335
(8,301)
—
114,323
(139)
251,382
132
56,901
(1,296)
(7,032)
105,305
(185)
153,825
$ 1,225,070 $ 968,221
¹Shares amounts related to periods prior to the July 12, 2021 closing of the Company’s second-step conversion offering
have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the 1.3400 exchange ratio applied in the conversion offering.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31,
2020
2021
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest-earning deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Interest Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
47,898 $
115
391
48,404
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Interest Expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Interest Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Other loan fees and service charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on disposition of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings on bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment advisory fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized (loss) gain on equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Non-Interest Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Occupancy expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outside data processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment loss on goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Non-Interest Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NET INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE – BASIC AND DILUTED¹ . . . . . . . . . . .
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING – BASIC AND DILUTED¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
48,202
360
415
48,977
9,254
687
36
9,977
39,000
814
38,186
1,045
(61)
609
425
288
207
2,513
13,809
1,932
917
1,771
168
98
313
6,080
25,088
15,611
3,282
12,329
4,359
706
36
5,101
43,303
3,610
39,693
1,568
7
600
514
(389)
54
2,354
14,996
2,115
993
1,652
139
-
93
6,485
26,473
15,574
3,669
11,905 $
0.75 $
0.76
15,854
16,150
¹Shares amounts related to periods prior to the July 12, 2021 closing of the Company’s second-step conversion offering
have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the 1.3400 exchange ratio applied in the conversion offering.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Defined benefit pension:
Reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income:
Amortization of prior service cost¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of actuarial loss¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial gain (loss) arising during period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax effect² . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands)
$
11,905 $
12,329
—
31
27
58
(12)
46
11,951 $
15
14
(136)
(107)
23
(84)
12,245
$
(1) Amounts are included in salaries and employees benefits in the audited consolidated statements of income as part of
net periodic pension cost. See Note 17 for further information.
(2) Amounts are included in provision for income taxes in the audited consolidated statements of operations.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Number of
Shares, net¹
Additional
Paid- in
Stock Capital
Common
Unearned
Retained
ESOP Shares Earnings
Treasury Comprehensive
Stock
Loss
Total
Accumulated
Other
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Balance – December 31, 2019 . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividend declared ($0.09 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ESOP shares earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance – December 31, 2020 . . . . . . .
17,721,500
—
—
—
—
17,721,500
$
$
132
—
—
—
—
132
$ 56,902
—
—
—
(1)
$ 56,901
$
$
(1,555) $ 93,767
12,329
—
—
—
$ (7,032) $
—
—
(101) $ 142,113
12,329
(84)
—
(84)
—
259
(791)
—
(1,296) $ 105,305
—
—
$ (7,032) $
—
—
(791)
258
(185) $ 153,825
Number of
Shares, net¹
Additional
Paid- in
Stock Capital
Common
Unearned
Retained
ESOP Shares Earnings
Treasury Comprehensive
Stock
Loss
Total
Accumulated
Other
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Balance – December 31, 2020 . . . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income . . . . . . .
Cash dividend declared ($0.18 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ESOP shares earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of unearned common stock
held by employee stock ownership
plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second-step conversion and stock
offering:
Conversion of existing shares . . . . . .
MHC shares sold in public offering,
net of cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retirement of NECB, MHC shares .
Fractional shares resulting from
conversion of existing shares . . . . .
Treasury stock retired . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance – December 31, 2021 . . . . . . .
17,721,500
—
—
$
132
—
—
$ 56,901
—
—
$
(1,296) $ 105,305
11,905
—
—
—
$ (7,032) $
—
—
(185) $ 153,825
11,905
46
—
46
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
108
—
823
(2,887)
—
—
—
—
(7,828)
—
—
—
—
—
(2,887)
931
(7,828)
6,593,954
9,784,077
(17,721,500)
(95)
—
16,377,936
32
95,358
—
—
—
—
95,390
—
164
(7,032)
$ 145,335
$
$
—
—
(8,301) $ 114,323
7,032
$
— $
—
—
(139) $ 251,382
¹Shares amounts related to periods prior to the July 12, 2021 closing of the Company’s second-step conversion offering
have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the 1.3400 exchange ratio applied in the conversion offering.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands)
$
11,905 $
12,329
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net amortization (accretion) of deferred loan fees and costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss (gain) recognized on equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnings on bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss on dispositions of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ESOP compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2)
3,610
1,117
82
118
389
—
—
(600)
(7)
931
(445)
830
3,628
21,556
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net increase in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal repayments on securities available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal repayments on securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of marketable equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net redemptions (purchase) of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of premises and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(166,670)
17,758
(3,140)
1
4,808
(10,000)
(15,304)
109
26
(6,451)
(178,863)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from FHLB of NY advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loan to ESOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash Provided (Used in) by Financing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Ending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
155,458
—
(7,828)
95,390
(374)
(2,261)
240,385
83,078
69,191
$ 152,269 $
F-8
(3)
814
1,067
(165)
(33)
(288)
98
168
(609)
61
257
116
1,754
97
15,663
(72,500)
—
—
3
1,959
—
(189)
120
(247)
(1,262)
(72,116)
(7,453)
7,000
—
—
(570)
(1,008)
(2,031)
(58,484)
127,675
69,191
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In thousands)
Supplementary Cash Flows Information:
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Supplementary Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Recognition of right of use asset – operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognition of lease liability – operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends declared and not paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
3,569 $
4,982 $
— $
— $
925 $
3,425
9,984
2,694
2,694
143
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a description of the Company’s business and significant accounting and reporting policies:
Nature of Business:
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation that was incorporated in May 2021
to be the successor to NorthEast Community Bancorp, Inc., a federally chartered corporation (the “Mid-Tier Holding
Company”), upon completion of the second-step conversion of NorthEast Community Bank (the “Bank”) from the
two-tier mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure. NorthEast Community Bancorp,
MHC was the former mutual holding company for the Mid-Tier Holding Company prior to the completion of the
second-step conversion. In conjunction with the second-step conversion, each of NorthEast Community Bancorp,
MHC and the Mid-Tier Holding Company merged out of existence and now cease to exist. The second-step
conversion was completed on July 12, 2021, at which time the Company sold, for gross proceeds of $97.8 million, a
total of 9,784,077 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share. As part of the second-step conversion, each of the
existing outstanding shares of Mid-Tier Holding Company common stock owned by persons other than NorthEast
Community Bancorp, MHC was converted into 1.3400 shares of Company common stock. As a result of the second-
step conversion, all share information has been subsequently revised to reflect the 1.3400 exchange ratio, unless
otherwise noted.
The Bank is a New York State-chartered savings bank and completed its conversion from a federally-chartered savings
bank effective as of the close of business on June 29, 2012. The Company’s primary activity is the ownership and
operation of the Bank.
The Bank is headquartered in White Plains, New York. The Bank was founded in 1934 and is a community oriented
financial institution dedicated to serving the financial services needs of individuals and businesses within its market
area. The Bank currently conducts business through its ten branch offices located in Bronx, New York, Orange,
Rockland and Westchester Counties in New York and Essex, Middlesex and Norfolk Counties in Massachusetts and
three loan production offices located in White Plains, New York, New City, New York and Danvers, Massachusetts.
The Bank’s principal business consists of originating primarily construction loans and, to a lesser extent, commercial
and industrial loans and multifamily and mixed-use residential real estate loans and non-residential real estate loans.
The Bank offers a variety of retail deposit products to the general public in the areas surrounding its main office and
its branch offices, with interest rates that are competitive with those of similar products offered by other financial
institutions operating in its market area. The Bank also utilizes borrowings as a source of funds. The Bank’s revenues
are derived primarily from interest on loans and, to a lesser extent, interest on investment securities and mortgage-
backed securities. The Bank also generates revenues from other income including deposit fees, service charges and
investment advisory fees.
The Bank also offers investment advisory and financial planning services under the name Harbor West Wealth
Management Group, a division of the Bank, through a networking arrangement with a registered broker-dealer and
investment advisor.
New England Commercial Properties LLC (“NECP”), a New York limited liability company and wholly owned
subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in October 2007 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank.
New England Commercial Properties, LLC currently owns one foreclosed property located in Pennsylvania.
NECB Financial Services Group, LLC (“NECB Financial”), a New York limited liability company and wholly owned
subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in the third quarter of 2012 as a complement to Harbor West Wealth Management
Group to sell life insurance and fixed rate annuities. NECB Financial is licensed in the States of New York and
Connecticut.
F-10
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
72 West Eckerson LLC (“72 West Eckerson”), a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary
of the Bank, was formed in April 2015 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank and currently
owns the Bank branch locations in Spring Valley, New York and Monroe, New York.
166 Route 59 Realty LLC (“166 Route 59 Realty”), a New York limited liability company and wholly owned
subsidiary of the Bank, was formed in April 2021 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank and
currently owns the Bank branch located in Airmont, New York.
3 Winterton Realty LLC, a New York limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, was formed
in October 2021 to facilitate the purchase or lease of real property by the Bank and currently owns the property for a
Bank branch located in Bloomingburg, New York.
Principles of Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, NECP, NECB Financial, 72
West Eckerson, 166 Route 59 Realty, and 3 Winterton Realty LLC (collectively the “Company”) and have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounting and
reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-K and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. When necessary, certain
reclassifications were made to prior year amounts to conform with current year presentation.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect certain recorded amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The most significant estimate pertains to the allowance for loan losses. The borrowers’ abilities to meet contractual
obligations and collateral value are the most significant assumptions used to arrive at the estimate. The risks associated
with such estimates arise when unforeseen conditions affect the borrowers’ abilities to meet the contractual obligations
of the loan and result in a decline in the value of the supporting collateral. Such unforeseen changes may have an
adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and financial position of the Company.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the
Company’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the
allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to significant changes in market interest rates. Such changes could have an
adverse effect on consolidated earnings and consolidated financial position, particularly in those situations in which
the maturities or re-pricing of assets are different than the maturities or re-pricing of the supporting liabilities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and amounts due from depository institutions and interest-bearing deposits in
other banks, all with original maturities of 90 days or less.
Certificates of Deposit:
Certificates of deposit are carried at cost which approximates fair value and have maturities of less than one year.
F-11
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Securities:
The Company classifies its debt securities as held to maturity or available for sale at the time of purchase. Held to
maturity securities are those debt securities which management has the intent and the Company has the ability to hold
to maturity and are reported at amortized cost (unless there is other than temporary impairment). Available for sale
securities are those debt securities which are neither held to maturity securities nor trading securities and are reported
at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the related income tax effect, excluded from earnings and reported
in a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
If the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost, the security is deemed to be impaired. Management
evaluates all securities with unrealized losses quarterly to determine if such impairments are temporary or other-than-
temporary. Temporary impairments on available for sale securities are recognized, on a tax-effected basis, through
other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) with offsetting adjustments to the carrying value of the security and the
balance of related deferred taxes. Temporary impairments on held to maturity securities are not recorded in the
consolidated financial statements; however, information concerning the amount and duration of unrealized losses on
held to maturity securities is disclosed.
Other-than-temporary impairments on debt securities that the Company has decided to sell, or will, more likely than
not, be required to sell prior to the full recovery of fair value to a level equal to or exceeding amortized cost, are
recognized in earnings. If either of these conditions regarding the likelihood of sale apply for a debt security, the
other-than-temporary impairment is bifurcated into credit-related and noncredit-related components. Credit-related
impairment generally represents the amount by which the present value of the cash flows that are expected to be
collected on a debt security fall below its amortized cost. The noncredit-related component represents the remaining
portion of the impairment not otherwise designated as credit-related. The Company recognizes credit-related other-
than-temporary impairments in earnings. Noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairments on debt securities are
recognized in OCI. Premiums and discounts on all securities are amortized/accreted to maturity by use of the level-
yield method. Gain or loss on sales of securities is based on the specific identification method.
Equity securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in income.
Loans Receivable:
Loans are stated at unpaid principal balances plus net deferred loan origination fees and costs less an allowance for
loan losses. Interest on loans receivable is recorded on the accrual basis. An allowance for uncollected interest is
established on loans where management has determined that the borrowers may be unable to meet contractual
principal and/or interest obligations or where interest or principal is 90 days or more past due, unless the loans are
well secured with a reasonable expectation of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, an allowance for
uncollected interest is established and charged against current income. Thereafter, interest income is not recognized
unless the financial condition and payment record of the borrower warrant the recognition of interest income.
Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance
with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectability of the
total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Interest on loans that have been restructured is accrued
according to the renegotiated terms. Net loan origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized into interest
income over the contractual lives of the related loans by use of the level yield method. Past due status of loans is
based upon the contractual due date.
Prepayment penalties received on loans which pay in full prior to the scheduled maturity are included in interest
income in the period the prepayment penalties are collected.
F-12
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the
statement of financial condition date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased
by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible
are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined
that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably
anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based
on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may
affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan
portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
Risk characteristics associated with the types of loans we underwrite are as follows:
Multi-family, Mixed-use and Non-residential Real Estate Loans. Loans secured by multi-family, mixed-use and
non-residential real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in multi-family, mixed-use and non-residential real estate lending is
the current and potential cash flow of the property and the borrower’s demonstrated ability to operate that type of
property. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of
the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans
to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which are generally made on the basis of a
borrower’s ability to make repayment from the operation and cash flow from the real property whose value tends to
be more ascertainable, commercial and industrial loans are of higher risk and tend to be made on the basis of a
borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of
funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business
itself. Further, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may
fluctuate in value.
Construction Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than
long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate due to (1) the increased difficulty and costs of monitoring the
loan; and (2) the increased difficulty of working out loan problems. We minimize this risk by concentrating on multi-
family and mixed-use projects and by limiting the Company’s activity to known borrowers in areas considered unique
communities with very strong demand outpacing the supply of residential housing.
Consumer Loans. We offer personal loans, loans secured by passbook savings accounts, certificates of deposit
accounts or statement savings accounts, and overdraft protection for checking accounts. We do not believe these loans
represent a significant risk of loss to the Company.
The allowance consists of specific and general reserves. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as
impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, a specific allowance is established or a partial charge-off is taken
when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the
carrying value of that loan. If an impairment is identified, the Company charges off the impaired portion immediately.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral
F-13
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience
insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking
into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay,
the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment records, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the
principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis.
The Company does not evaluate individual 1-4 family residential real estate and consumer loans for impairment,
unless such loans are part of a larger relationship that is impaired, or are classified as a troubled debt restructuring.
The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated
fair value of the loan’s collateral or discounted cash flows.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through in-house or third-party
appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated
certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age
of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal, the current value based on the
current loan to value and debt coverage ratios as calculated by the troubled debt officer and the executive committee,
and the condition of the property. Appraised values might be discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the
collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the
property, if any.
For loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair
values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging or
equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age
of the financial information or the quality of the assets.
The general component covers pools of loans by loan class including loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller
balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate and consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated
for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates, adjusted for qualitative factors. These qualitative risk factors
include:
1. Changes in policies and procedures in underwriting standards and collections.
2. Changes in economic conditions.
3. Changes in nature and volume of lending.
4. Experience of origination team.
5. Changes in past due loan volume and severity of classified assets.
6. Quality and scope of the loan review system.
7. Debt coverage ratios and loan-to-value averages in existing portfolio.
8. Concentrations of credit.
9. Legal and regulatory issues.
Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best
judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. The allowance calculation methodology
includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition,
repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for commercial loans or
when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments, for commercial, residential and consumer loans.
Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and
loss. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If
uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified as
substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include
F-14
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
loans that may be inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the
collateral pledged, if any.
Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard with the added
characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable.
Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not
classified are rated pass.
The allowance calculation for each pool of loans is also based on the loss factors that reflect the Company’s historical
charge-off experience adjusted for current economic conditions applied to loan groups with similar characteristics or
classifications in the current portfolio. To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future
capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Company has a proprietary structured loan rating process which
allows for a periodic review of its loan portfolio and the early identification of potential impaired loans. These
proprietary systems, depending on the type of loan, take into consideration factors such as project location, loan
duration, loan to value or loan to cost, property condition, borrower experience, guarantor strength, tenant
concentration, projected debt-service coverage, absorption rate, sponsor’s experience, and as well as other factors.
Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Company grants such borrowers
concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a
troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated
maturity date at a below market rate. In measuring the impairment associated with restructured loans that qualify as
troubled debt restructurings, the Company compares the present value of the cash flows that are expected to be
received in accordance with the loan’s modified terms, discounted at the loan’s original contractual interest rate, with
the pre-modification carrying value to measure impairment. Adversely classified, non-accrual troubled debt
restructurings may be returned to accrued status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are
current for six consecutive months after modification. All troubled debt restructured loans are classified as impaired.
Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the allowance for loan
losses is appropriate as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Concentration of Risk:
The Company’s lending activity is concentrated in construction and permanent loans secured by multi-family and
non-residential real estate located primarily in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. As of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had construction loans located in New York State totaling $279.1 million
and $181.9 million in the Bronx, $85.5 million and $96.1 million in the Village of Spring Valley, $61.2 million and
$69.5 million in the Town of Palm Tree, $87.5 million and $66.9 million in the Hamlet of Monsey, $51.5 million and
$63.3 million in Brooklyn and $15.2 million and $18.6 million in the Town of Monroe.
The Company also had deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limit at other financial institutions. At December 31,
2021 and 2020, such deposits totaled $125.0 million and $47.2 million held by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, $21.9 million and $10.0 million held by the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and $1.0 million and $4.4
million held by Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”). Generally, deposits in excess of $250,000 are not
insured by the FDIC.
Premises and Equipment:
Land is stated at cost. Buildings and improvements, leasehold improvements and furnishings and equipment are stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization computed on the straight-line method over the following useful
lives:
F-15
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Years
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 – 50
Building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 – 50
1 – 15
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 – 5
Furnishings and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations in the years incurred.
Property and equipment are evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In evaluating property and equipment for
recoverability, we use our best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the
carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset
and its fair value. The Company did not have impairment recorded for property and equipment in 2021 and 2020.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”):
The Company owns life insurance on the lives of certain of its officers. The cash surrender value is recorded as an
asset and the change in cash surrender value is included in non-interest income and is tax-exempt. The BOLI can be
liquidated, if necessary, with tax consequences. However, the Company intends to hold these policies and,
accordingly, the Company has not provided for deferred income taxes on the earnings from the increase in cash
surrender value.
Investments in Restricted Stock:
Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system to hold stock of its
district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The Company also owns restricted stock in Atlantic Community
Bancshares, Inc. (ACBI), holding company of ACBB, a correspondent banker’s bank. These stocks are carried at
cost. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had $1.5 million and $1.5 million in FHLB stock, and $70,000
and $70,000 in ACBB stocks.
Goodwill:
Goodwill at December 31, 2021 and 2020 totaled $651,000 and $651,000, respectively, and consists of goodwill
acquired in the business combination completed by the Company in November 2007. The Company tests goodwill
during the fourth quarter of each year for impairment, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or changes
in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. The Company utilizes a two-step approach. The first step
requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting unit to the fair value of the unit. The Company estimates
the fair value of the reporting unit through internal analyses and external valuation, which utilizes an income approach
based on the present value of future cash flows. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
impairment exists and the Company will perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the
amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test, if necessary, compares the
implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying value.
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination is determined. The Company allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets
and liabilities of that unit, including identifiable intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a
business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities
is the implied fair value of goodwill. No impairment charges were recorded in 2021. Impairment charges of $98,000
were recorded in 2020 due to a decrease in the assets under management resulting in an expected decrease in fee
revenue from this division.
F-16
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Real Estate Owned:
Real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value of the related property, as determined by current
appraisals less estimated costs to sell. Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at the fair value of property acquired
minus estimated costs to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Write-downs on these properties,
which occur after the initial transfer from the loan portfolio, are recorded as operating expenses. Costs of holding
such properties are charged to non-interest expense in the current period. Gains, to the extent allowable, and losses
on the disposition of these properties are reflected in the real estate owned expense in the consolidated statement of
income.
Property Held for Investment:
Land is stated at cost. Buildings and improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed on the
straight-line method over the useful lives between 30 to 50 years for buildings and 10 to 50 years for building
improvements.
Property held for investment is evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In evaluating property held for investment for
recoverability, we use our best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the
carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset
and its fair value. The Company did not have impairment recorded for property held for investment in 2021 and 2020.
Income Taxes:
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return. Income taxes are allocated to the Company, Bank,
NECP, and NECB Financial based upon their respective income or loss included in the consolidated income tax return.
The Company, the Bank, NECP, and NECB Financial file combined or separate state and city income tax returns
depending on the particular requirements of each jurisdiction.
Federal, state and city income tax expense has been provided on the basis of reported income. The amounts reflected
on the tax returns differ from these provisions due principally to temporary differences in the reporting of certain
items for financial reporting and income tax reporting purposes. The tax effect of these temporary differences is
accounted for as deferred taxes applicable to future periods. Deferred income tax expense or benefit is determined by
recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax base. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income
in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance provided, when necessary, for that portion
of the asset, which is not more likely than not to be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in its consolidated financial statements in
accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return, and also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has not identified any significant income tax uncertainties through
the evaluation of its income tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and has not recognized
any liabilities for tax uncertainties as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company’s policy is to recognize income
tax related interest and penalties in income tax expense; such amounts were not significant during the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020. The tax years subject to examination by federal, state, and city taxing authorities are
2018 through 2021.
F-17
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
The Company records in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of related deferred income taxes,
unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities and the prior service cost and actuarial gains and losses
related to the Outside Directors Retirement Plan (“DRP”) that have not yet been recognized in expense.
Gains and losses on the sale of securities, if any, are reclassified to non-interest income upon the sale of the related
securities or upon the recognition of a security impairment loss and a portion of the prior service cost and actuarial
gains and losses of the DRP are reclassified to non-interest expense.
At December 31, 2021, accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $139,000 and included $183,000 in prior
service cost and actuarial losses of the DRP net of $44,000 of related deferred income taxes. At December 31, 2020,
accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $185,000 and included $241,000 in prior service cost and actuarial
losses of the DRP net of $56,000 of related deferred income taxes.
Net Income Per Common Share:
Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by
the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Unallocated common shares held by
the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for purposes of calculating basic net income per common share until they are committed to be released.
There were no dilutive common share equivalents at December 31, 2021 or 2020.
Stockholders’ Equity:
The authorized capital stock of the Company under its federal charter consists of 75,000,000 shares of common stock,
par value of $0.01 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.01 per share. Each share of
common stock has the same relative rights as, and is identical in all respects with, each other share of common stock.
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company has issued 16,377,936 shares and 17,721,500 shares of common stock
with 16,377,936 shares and 16,340,779 shares outstanding. The Company has not issued any preferred stock.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP):
The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of shareholders’
equity. Compensation expense is based on the market price of shares as they are committed to be released to
participant accounts. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings. Dividends
on unallocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of the ESOP loan.
Treasury Stock:
The Company records treasury stock at cost.
Segment Information:
The Company reports certain financial information about significant revenue-producing segments of the business for
which such information is available and utilized by the chief operating decision makers. Substantially most of the
Company’s operations occur through the bank and involve the delivery of loan and deposit products to customers.
Small portion of the Company’s operations occurs through wealth management advisory service to customers.
Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of its banking and
advisory service. The wealth management operation does not meet the quantitative threshold requirement to be
disclosed separately.
F-18
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments:
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of
commitments to extend credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated statement of financial
condition when funded.
COVID-19 Pandemic:
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a
new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) originating in Wuhan, China and the risks to the international community
as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. In March 2020 and based on the rapid increase in exposure
globally, WHO classified COVID-19 as a global pandemic indicating that almost all public commerce and related
business activities must be, to varying degrees, curtailed with the goal of decreasing the rate of new infections.
The full impact of COVID-19 continues to evolve as of the date of this report. The outbreak of COVID-19 has, and
is anticipated to continue to, adversely impact a broad range of industries in which customers of the Company operate
and impair their ability to fulfill their financial obligations to the Company. In addition, the spread of COVID-19 has
caused and will likely continue to cause significant disruptions in the U.S. economy and is highly likely to continue
to disrupt banking and other financial activities in the areas in which the Company operates. The Company’s business
is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its employees and customers to conduct banking and other financial
transactions and the ability of borrowers to repay their obligations to us on a timely basis or if at all. If the global
response to contain COVID-19 escalates or is unsuccessful, the Company could experience a material adverse effect
on its business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Although the full magnitude of the pandemic is uncertain, management is actively monitoring the impact of the global
situation on the banking industry and the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, future results of operations, and
workforce. Given the daily evolution of COVID-19 and the global responses to curb the spread of COVID-19, the
Company is currently unable to estimate and quantify the effects of this crisis on the Company’s results of operations,
financial condition, or liquidity for 2021.
Nevertheless, the adverse economic effects of COVID-19 might lead to an increase in credit risk on the Company’s
construction loan, commercial and industrial loan, and multi-family, mixed-use, and non-residential real estate loan
portfolios. Likewise, the Company is also monitoring the fluctuations in the markets as it pertains to interest rates
and the impact on deposits and fair value of our securities portfolio for other than temporary impairment.
To curtail the spread of COVID-19, the Company temporarily closed one branch due to its location in an enclosed
shopping mall and the lobby, except by appointment only, of the other eight branches. Currently, all our nine branches
have resumed normal operations in servicing our customers.
On March 27, 2020, the President of the United States signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic
Security (“CARES”) Act in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This legislation aims at providing relief for
individuals and businesses that have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
includes a provision
the “troubled-
to opt out of applying
The CARES Act
debt restructuring” (“TDR”) accounting guidance
in ASC 310-40 for certain loan modifications. Loan
modifications made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (1) December 30, 2020 or (2) 60 days after the President
the related
declares a
loans were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019.
the COVID-19 national emergency are eligible for
termination of
the Company
this relief if
for
On December 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021 was signed
into law, which also contains provisions that could directly impact financial institutions, including extending the time
that insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies have to comply with the current
F-19
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
expected credit losses (“CECL”) accounting standard and extending the authority granted to banks under the CARES
Act to elect to temporarily suspend the requirements under U.S. GAAP applicable to troubled debt restructurings for
loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic for any loan that was not more than 30 days past due as of
December 31, 2019. The act directs financial regulators to support community development financial institutions and
minority depository institutions and directs Congress to re-appropriate $429 billion in unobligated CARES Act funds.
The Payroll Protection Program (PPP), which was originally established under the CARES Act, was also extended
under the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021.
Due to the impact of COVID-19 on our borrowers, we granted during the years ended December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2021 eligible loan modifications under the CARES Act in the form of payment deferral of principal
and interest to 196 loans totaling $190.9 million at the time payment deferral was requested. Subsequently, 109 loans
totaling $106.4 million were paid off and 86 loans totaling $84.5 million are no longer on deferral status. As of
December 31, 2021, we had one loan totaling $79,000 still in deferral status. As of February 1, 2022, the loan was
returned to normal payment status. The granting of the payment deferrals had no significant impact on our evaluation
of the allowance for loan losses. We did not grant any PPP loans pursuant to the CARES Act or the Coronavirus
Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021.
While the Company considers these disruptions to be temporary, if the disruptions continue, this might have an
adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity in 2022. Further, a decrease
in the results of future operations might place a strain on the Company’s regulatory capital ratios.
Note 2 – Mutual Holding Company Reorganization and Regulatory Matters
On July 5, 2006, the Bank reorganized from a mutual savings bank to a mutual holding company structure. In the
reorganization, the Company sold 5,951,250 shares of its common stock to the public and issued 7,273,750 shares of
its common stock to Northeast Community Bancorp, MHC (“MHC”). As disclosed in note 1, in conjunction with the
completion of the second-step conversion on July 12, 2021, each of NorthEast Community Bancorp, MHC and the
Mid-Tier Holding Company merged out of existence and now cease to exist.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the New York State Department of Financial Services
(“NYS”) are the Bank’s primary regulator. Under New York State Banking Law, New York state-chartered stock-
form savings banks may declare and pay dividends out of their net profits, unless there is an impairment of capital,
but approval of the NYS Superintendent is required if the total of all dividends declared by the bank in a calendar year
would exceed the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years
less prior dividends paid. The FDIC also has authority to use its enforcement powers to prohibit a savings bank from
paying dividends if, in its opinion, the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice.
The Company and its subsidiary Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements promulgated by the federal
banking agencies. The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well capitalized standards, for the
consolidated financial holding company, and the FDIC has similar requirements for the Company’s subsidiary bank.
Prior to January 1, 2015, quantitative measures were established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy which
required the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total, Tier 1 capital (as defined by regulations) to risk-
weighted assets (as defined), and of Core tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets (as defined).
Effective January 1, 2015, the Company adopted the Basel III final rule. Based on the Company’s capital levels and
statement of condition composition at December 31, 2019, the implementation of the new rule had no material impact
on our regulatory capital level or ratios at the Bank level. The new rule established limits at the Company level and
increased the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk based assets requirement from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets;
established a new common equity Tier 1 capital; and assigned a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more
than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition,
development or construction of real property. The new rule has a capital conservation buffer requirement that was
F-20
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 – Mutual Holding Company Reorganization and Regulatory Matters (continued)
phased in at a rate of 0.625% annually beginning January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2019, when full capital
conservation buffer requirement of 2.50% became effective. The Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which
it was subject as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The following table presents information about the Bank’s capital
levels at the dates presented:
Regulatory Capital Requirements
Actual
Minimum Capital
Adequacy(1)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
(Dollars in Thousands)
For Classification as
Well-Capitalized
Amount
Ratio
As of December 31, 2021:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . . $ 196,155
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . .
190,941
Common equity tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Core (Tier 1) capital (to adjusted total assets) . .
190,941
190,941
As of December 31, 2020:
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . . $ 143,021
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . .
137,962
Common equity tier 1 capital (to
risk-weighted assets) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Core (Tier 1) capital (to adjusted total assets) . .
137,962
137,962
(1) Ratios do not include the capital conservation buffer.
15.28 % $≥102,702 ≥8.00 % $≥128,377 ≥10.00 %
14.87
≥77,026 ≥6.00
≥102,702
≥8.00
14.87
16.79
≥57,770 ≥4.50
≥45,486 ≥4.00
≥83,445
≥56,857
≥6.50
≥5.00
13.72 % $ ≥83,399 ≥8.00 % $≥104,249 ≥10.00 %
13.23
≥62,550 ≥6.00
≥83,399
≥8.00
13.23
14.79
≥46,912 ≥4.50
≥37,304 ≥4.00
≥67,762
≥46,629
≥6.50
≥5.00
Based on the most recent notification by the FDIC, the Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action. There have been no conditions or events that have occurred since notification
that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
Note 3 - Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet
the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit. Those
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized
in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument
for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The
Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-
sheet instruments.
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 174,355 $ 129,066
327,336
Construction loans in process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436,916
7,002
6,922
Stand-by letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments to fund unused lines of credit:
Commercial and industrial lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,697
—
Multi-family real estate equity lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
90
Consumer lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
101,855
—
94
$ 748,980 $ 565,353
F-21
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk (continued)
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of
any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company,
is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.
Note 4 – Equity Securities
The following table is the schedule of Equity Securities at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Equity Securities, at Fair Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
19,943
$
10,332
The following is a summary of unrealized gains recognized in net income on equity securities during the year ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020:
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Net gain (loss) recognized on equity securities during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Less: Net losses realized on the sale of equity securities during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized net gain (loss) recognized on equity securities held at the reporting date . . . . . . . . $
(389) $
—
(389) $
288
—
288
Note 5 – Securities Available-for-Sale
The following table summarized the Company’s portfolio of securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . .
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2021
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Thousands)
1
1
$
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2020
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(In Thousands)
2
2
$
$
— $
— $
— $
— $
$
$
$
$
Fair
Value
Fair
Value
1
1
2
2
There were no sales of securities available-for-sale during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
F-22
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 – Securities Available-for-Sale (continued)
Contractual final maturities of mortgage-backed securities were as follows:
Due after one year but within five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2021
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
$
$
(In Thousands)
1 $
1 $
1
1
The maturities shown above are based upon contractual final maturity. Actual maturities will differ from contractual
maturities due to scheduled monthly repayments and due to the underlying borrowers having the right to prepay their
obligations. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had no unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale.
Note 6 – Securities Held-to-Maturity
The following table summarized the Company’s portfolio of securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2021 and
2020.
Municipal Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
Government National Mortgage Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal National Mortgage Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2021
Gross
Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair
Value
$ 10,017
$
656
1,059
2,695
3,453
$ 7,863
$ 17,880
$
$
$
$
(In Thousands)
7 $
267
$ 9,757
19 $
—
23
18
60 $
67 $
— $
5
6
49
60
327
675
1,054
2,712
3,422
$ 7,863
$ 17,620
December 31, 2020
Gross
Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair
Value
Municipal Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4,189
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
Government National Mortgage Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal National Mortgage Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
933
59
1,097
1,104
$ 3,193
$ 7,382
(In Thousands)
— $
— $ 4,189
25 $
—
45
68
138 $
138 $
— $
1
—
—
1
1
958
58
1,142
1,172
$ 3,330
$ 7,519
$
$
$
$
F-23
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Securities Held-to-Maturity (continued)
Contractual final maturities of mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds were as follows at December 31,
2021:
December 31, 2021
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after one but within five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after five but within ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due after ten years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
1,779
1,652
13,911
17,880 $
739
2,173
1,889
12,819
17,620
(In Thousands)
538 $
The maturities shown above are based upon contractual final maturity. Actual maturities will differ from contractual
maturities due to scheduled monthly repayments and due to the underlying borrowers having the right to prepay their
obligations.
The age of unrealized losses and the fair value of related securities held-to-maturity were as follows:
December 31, 2021:
Municipal Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mortgage-backed securities – residential:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . . .
Federal National Mortgage Association . . . . . . . . .
Collateralized mortgage obligations – GSE . . . . . .
December 31, 2020:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation . . . . . . . .
Less than 12 Months
Gross
Unrealized
Fair
12 Months or More
Gross
Unrealized
Fair
Total
Fair
Gross
Unrealized
Value Losses
Value Losses
Value Losses
(In Thousands)
$ 9,134
$ 1,004
2,035
907
3,946
$ 13,080
$
$
$
267
$ — $
— $ 9,134
5
6
49
60
327
$ — $
—
—
—
$ — $
— $ 1,004
2,035
—
907
—
—
3,946
— $ 13,080
$
$
$
267
5
6
49
60
327
Less than 12 Months
Gross
Unrealized
Fair
12 Months or More
Gross
Unrealized
Fair
Total
Fair
Gross
Unrealized
Value Losses
Value Losses
Value Losses
(In Thousands)
$
$
42
42
$
$
1
1
$ — $
$ — $
— $
— $
42
42
$
$
1
1
At December 31, 2021, four mortgage-backed security and three municipal bonds had unrealized loss. Management
concluded that the unrealized loss reflected above was temporary in nature since the unrealized loss was related
primarily to market interest rates for the mortgage-backed security and discounted yields for the municipal bonds, and
not related to the underlying credit quality of the issuers of the securities. Additionally, the Company has the ability
and intent to hold the securities for the time necessary to recover the amortized cost. At December 31, 2020, there
was one mortgage-backed security with unrealized loss.one mortgage-backed security had unrealized loss.
Management concluded that the unrealized loss reflected above for the mortgage-backed security was temporary in
nature since the loss was related primarily to market interest rates and not related to the underlying credit quality of
F-24
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Securities Held-to-Maturity (continued)
the issuer of the security. Additionally, the Company has the ability and intent to hold the security for the time
necessary to recover the amortized cost.
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans were as follows at December 31:
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Residential real estate:
One-to-four family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred loan (fees) costs, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
7,189 $
84,425
28,744
120,358
50,016
683,830
118,378
269
972,851
(5,242)
484
6,170
90,506
30,508
127,184
60,665
545,788
90,577
494
824,708
(5,088)
113
$ 968,093 $ 819,733
Loans serviced for the benefit of others totaled approximately $14,610,000 and $11,876,000 at December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively. The value of mortgage servicing rights was not material at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The Company did not issue PPP loans associated with the CARES Act in 2021 and 2020.
The Company had no loans to related parties at December 31, 2021 and 2020. In addition, the Company did not
originate any loans to related parties in 2021 and 2020.
The Company sold loan participations totaling $14.6 million in 2021 and sold no loan participations in 2020.
F-25
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
The following is an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and related information concerning loan
balances:
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2021:
Non-
residential
Real Estate Real Estate Construction
Residential
Commercial
and
Industrial
(In Thousands)
Consumer Unallocated
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable:
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
571 $
381 $
3,143 $
973 $
10 $
164 $
5,242
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
—
571 $
381 $
3,143 $
973 $
10 $
164 $
5,242
$120,358 $ 50,016 $ 683,830 $ 118,378 $
269 $
— $ 972,851
$
876 $
746 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
1,622
$119,482 $ 49,270 $ 683,830 $ 118,378 $
269 $
— $ 971,229
As of and For the Year Ended December 31, 2020:
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable:
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for
impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-
residential
Real Estate Real Estate Construction
Residential
Commercial
and
Industrial Consumer Unallocated
Total
(In Thousands)
$
$
$
707 $
519 $
3,068 $
774 $
20 $
— $
5,088
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
—
707 $
519 $
3,068 $
774 $
20 $
— $
5,088
$127,184 $ 60,665 $ 545,788 $ 90,577 $
494 $
— $ 824,708
$
2,009 $ 4,461 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
6,470
$125,175 $ 56,204 $ 545,788 $ 90,577 $
494 $
— $ 818,238
F-26
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
The activity in the allowance for loan loss by loan class for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was as
follows:
Non-
Residential
residential
Real Estate Real Estate Construction
Commercial
and
Industrial
(In Thousands)
Consumer Unallocated
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance - December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . $
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision (Benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance - December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . $
707
—
150
(286)
571
$
$
519
(3,593)
2
3,453
381
$
$
3,068
—
—
75
3,143
$
$
774
—
—
199
973
$
$
20 $
(23)
8
5
10 $
— $
—
—
164
164
$
5,088
(3,616)
160
3,610
5,242
Non-
Residential
residential
Real Estate Real Estate Construction
Commercial
and
Industrial
(In Thousands)
Consumer Unallocated
Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance - December 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . $
Charge-offs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision (Benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance - December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . $
605
—
3
99
707
$
$
503
(65)
9
72
519
$
$
2,692
—
—
376
3,068
$
$
566
(271)
15
464
774
$
$
71 $
(28)
—
(23)
20 $
$
174
—
—
(174)
— $
4,611
(364)
27
814
5,088
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the provision expenses recorded were primarily attributed to the previously
disclosed charge-off of $3.6 million in 2021 regarding a non-residential bridge loan secured by real estate with a
balance of $3.6 million. The loan is secured by commercial real estate located in Greenwich, Connecticut and
guaranteed by the two borrowers. The loan was originated in 2016 as a two-year bridge loan and, upon the borrower’s
failure to satisfy the loan at the maturity date, the loan was accelerated and a foreclosure action was instituted. The
loan remains in foreclosure but is subject to Connecticut’s continuing foreclosure backlog. The property securing the
loan is subject to a parking easement and based on a recently updated appraisal showing the property’s value with the
parking easement to be zero, the Company has determined to write off the $3.6 million loan as a non-cash charge
against the allowance for loan losses. The Company intends to aggressively seek recovery of all amounts due from
the personal guarantors of the loan. However, the recovery process is uncertain and might take an extended period of
time to resolve this matter. In the event the Company is successful against the guarantors, any recovery received
would be added back to the allowance for loan losses and an analysis will be performed at that time to determine the
appropriateness of recognizing the recovery into income.
Additionally the provision expenses recorded for commercial and industrial loan and construction loan segments were
primarily due to increased loan balances, and the credit provision recorded for residential real estate loan segment was
due to decreased loan balance.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the provision expenses recorded were primarily attributed to the perceived
potential credit risk associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, although no specific or probable losses were identified
at that time, as well as increased loan balances in construction loan and commercial and industrial loan segments.
F-27
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
The following table shows our recorded investment, unpaid principal balance and allocated allowance for loan losses
for loans that were considered impaired at:
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2021:
2021
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal Related
Average Recorded Interest Income
Balance
Allowance
(In Thousands)
Investment
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With an allowance recorded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total:
Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2020:
876 $
746
—
—
1,622
—
876
746
—
—
1,622 $
876 $ — $
—
813
—
—
—
—
—
1,689
—
—
876
813
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,689 $ — $
1,986 $
3,891
—
—
5,877
—
1,986
3,891
—
—
5,877 $
86
36
—
—
122
—
86
36
—
—
122
2020
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal Related Average Recorded Interest Income
Balance
Allowance
(In Thousands)
Investment
Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
With an allowance recorded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total:
Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2,009 $
4,461
—
—
6,470
—
2,009
4,461
—
—
6,470 $
2,009 $ — $
—
4,526
—
—
—
—
—
6,535
—
—
2,009
4,526
—
—
—
—
—
—
6,535 $ — $
2,666 $
4,371
—
—
7,037
—
2,666
4,371
—
—
7,037 $
87
50
—
—
137
—
87
50
—
—
137
F-28
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
The following table sets forth the composition of our nonaccrual loans at the dates indicated.
Loans Receivable on Nonaccrual Status as of December 31:
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
— $
— $
3,572
3,572
On non-accrual loans, the Company did not recognized any interest income during the year ended December 31, 2021
and 2020. Interest income that would have been recorded had the loans been on accrual status would have amounted
to approximately $173,000 and $236,000 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The
Company is not committed to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans have been placed on non-accrual status.
In 2021, the Company did not collect any interest income from a loan that was in non-accrual status. In 2020, the
Company collected $85,000 in interest income from a loan that was in non-accrual status in 2019 and was satisfied in
2020.
The following tables provide information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of December 31, 2021:
30 – 59 Days 60 – 89 Days Greater Than Total Past
Past Due Past Due
90 Days
Due
(In Thousands)
Current
Recorded
Investment >
90 Days and
Total Loans
Receivable Accruing
7,189 $
— $ — $
—
—
—
—
7,189 $
84,425
—
28,744
—
—
50,016
— 683,830
84,425
28,744
50,016
683,830
—
—
— $ — $ 972,851 $ 972,851 $
— 118,378
269
—
118,378
269
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Residential real estate:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . $
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial
loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
F-29
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of December 31, 2020:
30 – 59 Days 60 – 89 Days Greater Than Total Past
Past Due Past Due
90 Days
Due
(In Thousands)
Current
Recorded
Investment
Total Loans > 90 Days and
Receivable Accruing
Residential real estate:
One- to four-family . . . . . . . . $
Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . .
Construction loans . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and industrial
loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
— $ — $
—
—
3,572
—
6,170 $
90,506
30,508
57,093
— 545,788
—
—
3,572
90,506
30,508
60,665
545,788
6,170 $
—
—
3,572
—
—
$ 3,572
90,577
494
90,577
494
$ 821,136 $ 824,708 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
The following tables provide certain information related to the credit quality of our loan portfolio.
Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade as of December 31, 2021:
Residential Non-residential
Real Estate Real Estate
Commercial
Construction and Industrial Consumer
Total
(In Thousands)
Grade:
Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 120,358
—
Special Mention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Substandard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Doubtful . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 120,358
$
$
49,270
—
746
—
50,016
$ 683,830
—
—
—
$ 683,830
$ 118,378 $
—
—
—
$ 118,378 $
269
—
—
—
269
$ 972,105
—
746
—
$ 972,851
Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade as of December 31, 2020:
Residential Non-residential
Real Estate Real Estate
Construction and Industrial Consumer
Total
Commercial
(In Thousands)
Grade:
Pass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 127,184
—
Special Mention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Substandard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Doubtful . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 127,184
$
$
56,943
—
3,722
—
60,665
$ 545,788
—
—
—
$ 545,788
$
$
90,276 $
301
—
—
90,577 $
494
—
—
—
494
$ 820,685
301
3,722
—
$ 824,708
F-30
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)
Troubled Debt Restructuring:
The following table shows our recorded investment for loans classified as Trouble Debt Restructuring (TDR) that are
performing according to their restructured terms at the periods indicated:
December 31,
2021
2020
Number of
Recorded
contracts Investment contracts Investment
Recorded Number of
Residential Real Estate - Multi-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential Real Estate - Mixed-use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
Total performing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Dollars in Thousands)
1
2
2
5
—
876
746
$ 1,622
— $
2
2
4
$ 1,098
911
739
$ 2,748
The following is a summary of interest foregone on loans classified as TDR for the years ended December 31:
Year Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Interest income that would have been recognized had the loans performed in accordance
with their original terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Less: Interest income included in the results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total foregone interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
154
122
32
$
$
185
125
60
There were no loans modified that were deemed troubled debt restructuring during the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, none of the loans that were modified during
the previous twelve months had defaulted.
Note 8 - Premises and Equipment, Net
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furnishings and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
6,432 $
19,786
1,741
7,785
35,744
(11,837)
23,907 $
3,872
16,782
1,737
7,179
29,570
(10,895)
18,675
Depreciation expense on premises and equipment for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 totaled $1.1
million and $1.1 million, respectively.
F-31
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 - Accrued Interest Receivable, Net
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for uncollected interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note 10 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets at December 31 are summarized as follows:
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
4,204 $
79
4,283
—
4,283 $
4,420
16
4,436
(598)
3,838
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulative goodwill impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill, net of charge-off . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
1,310 $
(659)
651 $
1,310
(659)
651
The Company did not identify any impairment of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2021. The Company
identified $98,000 in goodwill impairment during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Note 11 - Real Estate Owned (“REO”)
The Company owned one foreclosed property valued at approximately $1,996,000 and $1,996,000 at both
December 31, 2021 and 2020, consisting of an office building located in Pennsylvania. The property was acquired
through foreclosure in December 2014.
Further declines in real estate values may result in impairment charges in the future. Routine holding costs are charged
to expense as incurred and improvements to real estate owned that enhance the value of the real estate are capitalized.
REO expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income, including loss on sales and write-downs, amounted
to $93,000 and $313,000 during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Note 12– Property Held For Investment
Property held for investment at December 31 are summarized as follows:
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
500 $
1,442
1,942
(461)
1,481 $
500
1,442
1,942
(424)
1,518
$
$
The Company owned one property at December 31, 2021 and 2020 consisting of a former branch office located in
Plymouth, Massachusetts. The property is currently leased to a car rental company to generate current income for the
Company.
F-32
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 – Deposits
Total deposits at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and the weighted average rate of deposits are as follows:
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOW and money market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit maturing in:
One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After one to two years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After two to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After three to four years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After four years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amount
$ 330,853
118,420
449,273
184,896
189,247
35,677
16,950
38,373
12,748
292,995
$ 927,164
December 31,
2021
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
2020
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
— % $ 221,371
0.53 % 100,945
0.14 % 322,316
0.63 % 101,693
0.89 % 211,834
71,381
1.23 %
8,962
1.82 %
10,516
0.63 %
1.31 %
45,004
0.97 % 347,697
0.50 % $ 771,706
— %
0.50 %
0.16 %
0.33 %
1.38 %
1.39 %
1.95 %
2.43 %
0.81 %
1.35 %
0.72 %
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, certificates of deposits equal to or in excess of $250,000 totaled approximately
$134,733,000 and $158,092,000, respectively. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the demand deposit overdrafts
totaled $233,000 and $452,000.
The aggregate amount of brokered deposits was $44.6 million and $70.7 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company also had $22.3 million and $8.5 million, respectively,
in Insured Cash Sweep (“ICS”) reciprocal money market deposits, which are no longer considered fully-insured
brokered deposits as defined in the FDIC call report instructions.
The ICS money market deposits were obtained from six retail depositors and then transferred into the ICS Network
in order to obtain full FDIC insurance coverage for our customers. These types of deposits are known in the ICS
Network as reciprocal deposits, which the Company considers as core deposits and not brokered deposits.
Interest expense on deposits consists of the following:
Demand deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Savings accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
696 $
328
3,335
4,359 $
734
626
7,894
9,254
$
$
F-33
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 14 – Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) Advances
FHLB advances are summarized as follows at December 31:
Advances maturing in:
One year or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After one to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After three to four years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After five years (due 2030) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2021
Amount
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
Amount
(Dollars in Thousands)
2020
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
$ 7,000
14,000
—
7,000
$ 28,000
2.79 % $ 14,000
7,000
2.85 %
—
— %
1.61 %
7,000
2.52 % $ 28,000
2.81 %
2.86 %
— %
1.61 %
2.52 %
At December 31, 2021, none of the above advances were subject to early call or redemption features. All advances
had fixed interest rates and the term of the advance ranges between 2 and 10 years. At December 31, 2021, the
advances were secured by a pledge of the Company’s investment in the capital stock of the FHLB and a blanket
assignment of the Company’s otherwise unpledged qualifying mortgage loans. At December 31, 2021, these
unpledged qualifying mortgage loans were not pledged to any company other than the FHLB. At December 31, 2021,
the Company had the ability to borrow $29.4 million, net of $28.0 million in outstanding advances, from the FHLB
and $8.0 million from ACBB.
Note 15 - Income Taxes
The Bank qualifies as a savings institution under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and was, therefore, prior
to January 1, 1996, permitted to deduct from taxable income an allowance for bad debts based upon eight percent of
taxable income before such deduction, less certain adjustments. Retained earnings at December 31, 2021 and 2020,
include approximately $4.1 million of such bad debt deductions which, in accordance with U.S. GAAP is considered
a permanent difference between the book and income tax basis of loans receivable, and for which deferred income
taxes have not been provided. If such amount is used for purposes other than for bad debt losses, including
distributions in liquidation, it will be subject to income tax at the then current rate.
The components of provision for income taxes are summarized as follows:
Current tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
$
$
3,551 $
118
3,669 $
3,315
(33)
3,282
The following table presents a reconciliation between the reported income taxes and the income taxes, which would
be computed by applying the existing federal income tax rate of 21% for 2021 and 2020 to income before taxes:
Years Ended December 31,
Federal income tax at statutory rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and city tax, net of federal income tax effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-taxable income on bank owned life insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective Income Tax Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
F-34
$
2021
2020
(Dollars In Thousands)
3,271
506
(126)
18
3,669
3,278
183
(128)
(51)
3,282
$
23.6 %
21.0 %
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 15 – Income Taxes (continued)
The tax effects of significant items comprising the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserve for uncollected interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefit plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss – DRP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Deferred Tax Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Deferred tax liability:
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Deferred Tax Assets Included in Other Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
1,238
82
—
1,562
44
2,926
403
133
227
763
2,163
$
$
1,207
89
141
1,449
56
2,942
297
112
240
649
2,293
The Company has state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards totaling approximately $3,100,000 at December 31,
2021 that are available to be carried forward to future years. These NOL carryforwards will start to expire beginning
in 2035 if not fully utilized.
At December 31, 2021, the Company had no valuation allowance because the Company determined there will be
enough future New York State taxable income to utilize the New York State deferred tax assets.
Note 16 - Other Non-Interest Expenses
The following is an analysis of other non-interest expenses:
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Service contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consulting expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Directors compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit and accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Director, officer, and employee expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office supplies and stationary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recruiting expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,947
915
1,043
578
540
498
303
272
231
129
29
6,485
$
$
2,047
807
763
551
520
361
329
286
283
128
5
6,080
F-35
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 - Benefits Plans
Outside Director Retirement Plan (“DRP”)
The DRP is an unfunded non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all non-employee directors meeting
eligibility requirements as specified in the plan document. The following table sets forth the funded status of the DRP
and components of net pension periodic expense measured as of December 31:
Years Ended December 31,
Projected benefit obligation – beginning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits Paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Projected benefit obligation – ending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded status – accrued liability included in accounts payable and accrued expenses . . .
Accumulated benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
$
2021
2020
(Dollars In Thousands)
2,046
124
48
(27)
—
(104)
2,087
2,087
1,947
1,851
125
39
135
—
(104)
2,046
2,046
1,900
$
$
$
2.45 %
2.00 %
2.02 %
2.00 %
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(Dollars In Thousands)
Net periodic pension expense:
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial loss recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service cost recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total net periodic pension expense included in other non-interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . .
Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
124
48
31
—
$
203
2.45 %
2.00 %
125
39
14
15
193
2.02 %
2.00 %
Benefit payments, which reflect expected future service as appropriate, are expected to be paid for the years ending
December 31 as follows (in thousands):
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2027 to 2031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
104
104
206
192
206
1,012
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, unrecognized net gain of $27,000 and unrecognized net loss of $136,000,
respectively, were included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)
The SERP is a non-contributory defined benefit plan that covers certain officers of the Company. Under the SERP,
each of these individuals will be entitled to receive upon retirement an annual benefit paid in monthly installments
equal to 50% of his average base salary in the three-year period preceding retirement. Each individual may also retire
F-36
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 - Benefits Plans (continued)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)(continued)
early and receive a reduced benefit upon the attainment of certain age and years of service combination. Additional
terms related to death while employed, death after retirement, disability before retirement and termination of
employment are fully described within the plan document. The benefit payment term is the greater of 15 years or the
executives remaining life. No benefits are expected to be paid during the next five years.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, expenses of $455,000 and $303,000, respectively, were
recorded for this plan and are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income under Salaries and Employee
Benefits. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, a liability for this plan of $3,778,000 and $3,322,000, respectively, is
included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition under Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses.
401(k) Plan
The Company maintains a 401(k) plan for all eligible employees. Participants are permitted to contribute from 1% to
15% of their annual compensation up to the maximum permitted under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company
provided no matching contribution in 2021 and 2020.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
In conjunction with the Mid-Tier Holding Company’s public stock offering in 2006, the Bank established an ESOP
for all eligible employees (substantially all full-time employees). The ESOP borrowed $5,184,200 from the Mid-Tier
Holding Company and used those funds to acquire 518,420 shares of the Mid-Tier Holding Company common stock
at $10.00 per share. The loan from the Mid-Tier Holding Company, which has been assumed by the Company, carries
an interest rate of 8.25% and is repayable in twenty annual installments through 2025.
In conjunction with the Company’s second-step conversion offering, on July 12, 2021, the ESOP borrowed
$7,827,260 from the Company and used those funds to acquire 782,726 shares of Company common stock at $10.00
per share. The loan from the Company carries an interest rate equal to 3.25% and is repayable in fifteen annual
installments through 2035.
Each year, the Bank makes discretionary contributions to the ESOP equal to the principal and interest payment
required on the loan from the Company. The ESOP may further pay down the principal balance of the loans by using
dividends paid, if any, on the shares of Company common stock it owns. The balance remaining on the first ESOP
loan was $1,703,000 and $2,051,000 at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The balance remaining on the second ESOP
loan was $7,270,000 at December 31, 2021.
Shares purchased with the loan proceeds serve as collateral for the loan and are held in a suspense account for future
allocation among ESOP participants. As the loan principal is repaid, shares will be released from the suspense account
and become eligible for allocation. The allocation among plan participants will be as described in the ESOP governing
document.
ESOP shares initially pledged as collateral were recorded as unearned ESOP shares in the stockholders’ equity section
of the consolidated statement of financial condition. Thereafter, on a monthly basis over the terms of the ESOP loans,
approximately 2,894 shares for the ESOP established in 2006 and approximately 4,348 shares for the ESOP
established in 2021 are committed to be released respectively. Compensation expense is recorded equal to the shares
committed to be released multiplied by the average closing price of the Company’s stock during that month. ESOP
expense during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, totaled approximately $931,000 and $258,000,
respectively. Dividends on unallocated shares, which totaled approximately $115,000 and $19,000 during 2021 and
2020, respectively, are recorded as a reduction of the ESOP loan. Dividends on allocated shares, which totaled
approximately $63,000 and $43,000 during 2021 and 2020, respectively, are charged to retained earnings.
F-37
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 - Benefits Plans (continued)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)(continued)
ESOP shares are summarized as follows:
Allocated shares¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares committed to be released¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unearned shares¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total ESOP Shares¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less allocated shares distributed to former or retired employees¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total ESOP Shares Held by Trustee¹ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of unearned shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31,
2020
2021
486,278
521,012
34,734
86,910
173,671
869,487
694,683
1,477,409
(102,522)
(106,369)
1,371,040
592,161
$ 9,677,390 $ 1,684,865
¹Shares amounts related to periods prior to the July 12, 2021 closing of the Company’s second-step conversion offering
have been restated to give retroactive recognition to the 1.3400 exchange ratio applied in the conversion offering.
Note 18 - Leases
The Company has operating leases and finance leases all comprised of real estate property. The operating leases
comprise substantially all of the Company’s obligations in which the Company is the lessee, with remaining lease
terms ranging between 2 and 9 years. Most operating lease agreements consist of initial lease terms ranging between
5 and 10 years, with options to renew the leases or extend the term. The finance lease has a remaining lease term of
95 years. The payment structure of all leases is fixed rental payments with lease payments increasing on pre-
determined dates at either a predetermined amount or change in the consumer price index.
In accordance with ASC 842, the Company recognized operating and financing lease assets and corresponding lease
liabilities related to office facilities and retail branches. The operating and financing lease assets represent the
Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and the lease liability represents the Company’s
obligation to make lease payments over the lease term. The Company has elected that any short term leases would be
expensed as incurred.
The operating and financing lease asset and lease liability are determined at the commencement date of the lease based
on the present value of the lease payments. Our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate. The company used its
incremental borrowing rate, the rate of interest to borrow in a collateralized basis for a similar term, at the lease
commencement date.
All of the leases are net leases and, therefore, do not contain non-lease components. The Company either pays directly
or reimburses the lessor for property and casualty insurance cost and the property taxes assessed on the property, as
well as a portion of the common area maintenance associated with the property which are categorized as non-
components as outlined in the applicable guidance.
F-38
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18 – Leases (continued)
The quantitative data relates to the Company’s leases are as follows (in thousands):
Finance Lease Amounts:
ROU asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Lease Amounts:
ROU assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finance Lease Cost
Amortization of ROU asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on lease liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Lease Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Finance lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted-average remaining lease term
December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
359
496
2,564
2,604
4
36
566
(36)
545
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
363
460
3,094
3,115
4
36
487
(36)
472
Finance lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95 years
7.02
96 years
7.61
Weighted-average discount rate
Finance lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.50 %
1.22 %
9.50 %
1.34 %
Maturities of lease liabilities at December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31:
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lease liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating
Leases
Finance
Lease
$
$
$
549 $
423
333
302
235
875
2,717 $
(113)
2,604 $
30
30
30
30
31
4,055
4,206
(3,710)
496
Note 19 – Contingencies
The Company and Bank are also subject to claims and litigation that arise primarily in the ordinary course of business.
Based on information presently available and advice received from legal counsel representing the Company and Bank
in connection with such claims and litigation, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate
determination of such claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
F-39
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20 - Fair Value Disclosures
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to
determine fair value disclosures. The Company’s securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company has to record at fair value other assets and liabilities on a non-
recurring basis, such as securities held to maturity, impaired loans and other real estate owned. U.S. GAAP has
established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1:
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical,
unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2:
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly,
for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3:
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).
An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to
the fair value measurement. The following table sets forth the Company’s assets that are carried at fair value on a
recurring basis and the level that was used to determine their fair value at December 31:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total Carried
at Fair
Value on a
Recurring Basis
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
Description
Assets:
Marketable equity
securities:
Mutual funds . . . . . $ 19,943 $ 10,332 $
— $
— $
— $
— $ 19,943 $ 10,332
Mortgage-backed
securities
FHLMC . . . . . . . . .
—
—
Total assets . . . . . $ 19,943 $ 10,332 $
1
1
$
2
2 $
—
— $
—
2
1
— $ 19,944 $ 10,334
There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company
did not have any liabilities that were carried at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
F-40
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20 – Fair Value Disclosures (continued)
The following table sets forth the Company’s assets that are carried at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level
that was used to determine their fair value, at December 31:
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total Carried
at Fair
Value on a
Non-Recurring Basis
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
Description
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
(In Thousands)
2020
2021
2020
Assets:
Impaired loans . . . . . . . $
Real estate owned . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
150 $
1,996
2,146 $
— $
—
— $
150
1,996
2,146
The following tables present the qualitative information about non-recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of
financial instruments at the periods indicated:
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Input
Range
Weighted
Average
At December 31, 2021
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ — Income approach Capitalization rate
— Income approach Capitalization rate
— % — %
— % — %
Fair
Value
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Input
Range
Weighted
Average
At December 31, 2020
(In Thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate owned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
150
1,996
Income approach Capitalization rate 7.50 %
Income approach Capitalization rate 8.40 %
7.50 %
8.40 %
The Company did not have any liabilities that were carried at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31,
2021 and 2020.
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:
For real estate owned, fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals or fair value estimations of
the underlying properties which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. The appraisals
or fair value estimation may be adjusted by management for qualitative reasons and estimated liquidation
expenses. Management’s assumptions may include consideration of location and occupancy of the property and
current economic conditions. Subsequently, as these properties are actively marketed, the estimated fair values may
be periodically adjusted through incremental subsequent write-downs to reflect decreases in estimated values resulting
from sales price observations and the impact of changing economic and market conditions.
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events; it is probable that the Company will
be unable to collect all scheduled payments in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans that
are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves, a component of
the allowance for loan losses or through partial charge-offs, and as such are carried at the lower of cost or the fair
value. Estimates of fair value of the collateral are determined based on a variety of information, including available
valuations from certified appraisers for similar assets, present value of discounted cash flows and inputs that are
F-41
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20 - Fair Value Disclosures (continued)
estimated based on commonly used and generally accepted industry liquidation advance rates and estimates and
assumptions developed by management. The appraisals may be adjusted by management for estimated liquidation
expenses and qualitative factors such as economic conditions. If real estate is not the primary source of repayment,
present value of discounted cash flows and estimates using generally accepted industry liquidation advance rates are
utilized. Due to the multitude of assumptions, many of which are subjective in nature, and the varying inputs and
techniques used by appraisers, the Company recognizes that valuations could differ across a wide spectrum of
valuation techniques employed and accordingly, fair value estimates for impaired loans are classified as Level 3.
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however,
there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the
fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales
transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-
ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those
respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective
reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.
The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair
value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range
of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the
Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and
assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2021 and
2020:
Securities
Fair values for marketable equity securities are determined by quoted market prices on nationally recognized and
foreign securities exchanges (Level 1). Fair values for securities available for sale and held to maturity are determined
utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent
pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads,
cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments
speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.
F-42
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 20 - Fair Value Disclosures (continued)
Securities (continued)
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our financial instruments are as follows:
Fair Value at
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Significant
Observable Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Inputs
(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketable equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held to maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 152,269
100
19,943
1
17,880
968,093
1,569
4,283
$ 152,269
100
19,943
1
17,620
968,247
1,569
4,283
$ 152,269 $
—
19,943
—
—
—
—
—
— $
100
—
1
17,620
—
1,569
4,283
Financial Liabilities
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB of New York advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
927,164
28,000
—
929,003
28,283
—
— 929,003
28,283
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
968,247
—
—
—
—
—
Fair Value at
December 31, 2020
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Significant
Observable Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Inputs
(Level 3)
Carrying
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Amount
Fair Value
(Level 1)
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketable equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities available for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Securities held to maturity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 69,191
100
10,332
2
7,382
819,733
1,595
3,838
$ 69,191
100
10,332
2
7,519
823,996
1,595
3,838
$ 69,191 $
—
10,332
—
—
—
—
—
— $
100
—
2
7,519
—
1,595
3,838
Financial Liabilities
Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FHLB of New York advances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
771,706
28,000
8
776,413
29,292
8
— 776,413
29,292
—
8
—
—
—
—
—
—
823,996
—
—
—
—
—
F-43
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 21 – Related Party Transactions
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no outstanding loans to a related party. Deposits of related parties at the
Company totaled $1.7 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Kevin P. O’Malley is an attorney with Kevin P. O’Malley, P.C., a law firm that provides construction loan closing
services to borrowers of the Company. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, construction loan
borrowers of the Company paid $779,687 and $536,106 respectively in legal fees to Mr. O’Malley’s law firm in
connection with closing of construction loans. In addition, in fiscal year 2021 and 2020, the Company paid
Mr. O’Malley’s law firm $26,000 and $3,000 for legal services provided on a corporate related matter.
Note 22 – Revenue Recognition
The majority of the Company’s revenues come from interest income and other sources, including loans and securities
that are outside the scope of ASC 606. The Company’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are presented
within noninterest income and are recognized as revenue as the Company satisfies its obligation to the
customer. Services within the scope of ASC 606 include deposit service charges on deposits, electronic banking fees
and charges income, and investment advisory fees.
A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays
consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract
liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received
payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on
transactional activity, or standard month-end revenue accruals such as referral fees based month end reports.
Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and
revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and
therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have
any significant contract balances.
All of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within
noninterest income. The following table presents the Company’s sources of noninterest income for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020. Sources of revenue outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such:
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousands)
Non-interest income:
Deposit-related fees and charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loan-related fees and charges(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Electronic banking fees and charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on disposition of equipment(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from bank owned life insurance(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment advisory fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity securities(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
71 $
828
669
7
600
514
(389)
54
2,354 $
77
539
429
(61)
609
425
288
207
2,513
(1) Not within the scope of ASC 606.
F-44
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 22 – Revenue Recognition (continued)
A description of the Company’s revenue streams accounted for under ASC 606 is as follows:
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
The Company earns fees from deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services.
Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering,
and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed at the point in the time the Company fulfills the
customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the
course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft
fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the
customer’s account balance.
Electronic Banking Fee Income
The Company earns interchange fees from debit and credit card holder transactions conducted through various
payment networks. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions are recognized daily, concurrently with the
transaction processing services provided by an outsourced technology solution.
Investment Advisory Fees
The Company earns fees from investment advisory and financial planning services under the name of Harbor West
Financial Planning Wealth Management, a division of the Company through a networking arrangement with a
registered broker-dealer and investment advisor. The registered broker-dealer deducts investment advisory fees and
financial planning services fees from the client’s assets under management and remits the fees, net of administrative
fees, to the Company on a monthly basis. The Company recognizes the fees into non-interest income upon receipt of
the monthly remittances.
Note 23 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Pending Adoption:
ASU 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement
of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which requires credit losses on most financial assets to be measured at
amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the
current expected credit loss (CECL) model).
Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering
estimated prepayments but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt
restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument.
The ASU also replaces the current accounting model for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities. The
allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration
since origination ("PCD assets") should be determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured on an
amortized cost basis. Upon initial recognition, the allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price ("gross
up approach") to determine the initial amortized cost basis. The subsequent accounting for PCD assets will use the
CECL model described above.
F-45
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 23 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
The ASU made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt
securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to
sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis.
As amended, ASU No. 2016-13 and any related amending ASUs No. 2019-04, 2019-11, and 2020-03 are effective
for entities qualifying as smaller reporting companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including
interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Company has begun collecting and evaluating data and system requirements to implement this standard. The
adoption of this update could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial
condition. The extent of the impact is still unknown and will depend on many factors, such as the composition of the
Company’s loan portfolio and expected loss history at adoption. Management has engaged consultants to assess the
preparedness of the Company for evaluating and implementing CECL.
ASU 2020-03 - Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-03, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.” This
ASU clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the CECL standard issued in 2016. Amendments related
to ASU 2016-13 for entities that have not yet adopted that guidance are effective upon adoption of the amendments
in ASU 2016-13. Early adoption is not permitted before an entity’s adoption of ASU 2016-13. Other amendments are
effective upon issuance of this ASU. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-13 above.
ASU 2020-04 - Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)" which provides optional
expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships that reference
LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued, subject to meeting certain criteria. Under the new
guidance, an entity can elect by accounting topic or industry subtopic to account for the modification of a contract
affected by reference rate reform as a continuation of the existing contract, if certain conditions are met. In addition,
the new guidance allows an entity to elect on a hedge-by-hedge basis to continue to apply hedge accounting for
hedging relationships in which the critical terms change due to reference rate reform, if certain conditions are met. A
one-time election to sell and/or transfer held-to-maturity debt securities that reference a rate affected by reference rate
reform is also allowed. ASU No. 2020-04 became effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 and will apply to all
LIBOR reference rate modifications through December 31, 2022.
ASU 2021-01 - Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)
In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)". The amendments in this
update clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge
accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. Specifically, certain provisions in Topic
848, if elected by an entity, apply to derivative instruments that use an interest rate for margining, discounting, or
contract price alignment that is modified as a result of reference rate reform. Amendments in this update to the
expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and tailor the
existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition. ASU No. 2021-01 became
immediately effective for all entities, which may elect to apply the update retrospectively as of any date from the
beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications
from any date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to the issuance date of ASU No. 2021-01 up to
the date that financial statements are available to be issued. In addition, ASU No.2021-01 applies to all contract
modifications made through December 31, 2022. We are evaluating the impacts of this ASU and have not yet
determined whether LIBOR transition and this ASU will have material effects on our business operations and
consolidated financial statements. The amendments in this update apply to contract modifications that replace a
F-46
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 23 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
reference rate reform and contemporaneous modifications of other terms related to the replacement of the reference
rate.
ASU 2021-06 - Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205)
In August 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-06, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205), Financial
Services – Depository and Lending (Topic 942), and Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946):
Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial
Disclosures about Acquired and Disposed Businesses, and No. 33-10835, Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank
and Savings and Loan Registrants (SEC Update), to amend SEC paragraphs in the Accounting Standards Codification
to reflect the issuance of SEC Release No. 33-10786, Amendments to Financial Disclosures about Acquired and
Disposed Businesses, and No. 33-10835, Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank and Savings and Loan Registrants.
This ASU was effective upon issuance and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Note 24 - Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these
consolidated financial statements were issued.
Note 25 – Parent Company Only Financial Information
The following are the condensed financial statements for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (Parent company only)
as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years then ended.
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousand)
$
44,388 $
194,497
4,477
8,973
5,844
142,179
3,917
2,051
$ 252,335 $ 153,991
$
953 $
953
251,382
166
166
153,825
$ 252,335 $ 153,991
Assets
Cash and due from banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $29 and $29, respectively(1). . . . . . .
ESOP loan receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) Represents participation loans purchased from the Bank
F-47
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 25 – Parent Company Only Financial Information (continued)
Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Interest income – loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income – ESOP loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income – interest-earning deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before Income Tax Expense and Equity in Undistributed Earnings of
Subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before Equity in Undistributed Earnings of Subsidiary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Statements of Cash Flow
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for loan losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Repayment of ESOP loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (increase) decrease in loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital infusion to subsidiary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loan to ESOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Ending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousand)
287 $
289
1
—
(248)
268
196
14
(11)
(208)
329
82
247
11,658
11,905 $
11,951 $
259
65
194
12,135
12,329
12,245
$
$
$
Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
(In Thousand)
$
11,905 $
12,329
(11,658)
—
161
408
906
(560)
(47,511)
(47,165)
(2,261)
(7,828)
95,390
85,301
38,544
5,844
44,388 $
$
(12,135)
11
(3)
202
321
430
—
751
(1,008)
—
—
(1,008)
(55)
5,899
5,844
F-48
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
Dated: March 30, 2022
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
By: /s/ Kenneth A. Martinek
Kenneth A. Martinek
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
/s/ Kenneth A. Martinek
Kenneth A. Martinek
/s/ Jose M. Collazo
Jose M. Collazo
/s/ Donald S. Hom
Donald S. Hom
/s/ Diane B. Cavanaugh
Diane B. Cavanaugh
/s/ Charles M. Cirillo
Charles M. Cirillo
/s/ Eugene M. Magier
Eugene M. Magier
/s/ Charles A. Martinek
Charles A. Martinek
/s/ John F. McKenzie
John F. McKenzie
/s/ Kevin P. O’Malley
Kevin P. O’Malley
/s/ Kenneth H. Thomas
Kenneth H. Thomas
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2022
Title
Date
(Principal Executive Officer)
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
March 30, 2022
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2022
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
March 30, 2022
NORTHEAST COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
Board of Directors
Kenneth A. Martinek, Chairman
Diane B. Cavanaugh
Charles M. Cirillo
Jose M. Collazo
Eugene M. Magier
Charles A. Martinek
John F. McKenzie
Kevin P. O’Malley
Kenneth H. Thomas
Executive Officers of Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
Kenneth A. Martinek
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Jose M. Collazo
President and Chief Operating Officer
Donald S. Hom
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Executive Officers of Northeast Community Bank
Kenneth A. Martinek
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Jose M. Collazo
President and Chief Operating Officer
Donald S. Hom
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
325 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601