OceanFirst Financial
Annual Report 2016

Plain-text annual report

2016 ANNUAL REPORT OceanFirst Financial cOrp. operates as the holding company for OceanFirst Bank, a community-oriented financial institution offering a wide variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves throughout central and southern New Jersey. The Bank provides commercial and residential financing solutions, wealth management, and deposit services. OceanFirst Bank is the fourth largest New Jersey-based banking institution by deposit market share. P hila d elp hia Philadelp hia ✪ New York Headquarters Retail Branches, Loan Production Offices, and Wealth Management Offices Financial Summary (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) At or for the year ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 2013 Selected Financial condition data: Total assets Loans receivable, net Deposits Stockholders’ equity Selected operating data: Net interest income Other income Operating expenses(1) Net income(1) Diluted earnings per share(1) Selected Financial ratioS: Tangible stockholders’ equity per share Cash dividend per share Tangible stockholders’ equity to total tangible assets Return on average assets(1) Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity(1) Net interest rate spread Net interest rate margin Operating expenses to average assets(1) Efficiency ratio(1) Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable $5,167,052 3,803,443 4,187,750 572,038 $2,593,068 1,970,703 1,916,678 238,446 $2,356,714 1,688,846 1,720,135 218,259 $ 2,249,711 1,541,460 1,746,763 214,350 120,262 20,412 102,852 23,046 0.98 12.95 0.54 8.30% 0.62 7.13 3.38 3.47 2.76 73.11 0.35 76,829 16,426 60,775 20,322 1.21 13.67 0.52 9.12% 0.82 8.96 3.18 3.28 2.47 65.17 0.91 72,348 18,577 57,764 19,920 1.19 12.91 0.49 9.26% 0.86 9.18 3.23 3.31 2.50 63.53 1.06 70,529 16,458 59,244 16,330 0.95 12.33 0.48 9.53% 0.71 7.51 3.16 3.24 2.58 68.11 2.88 (1) Amounts and performance ratios for 2016 include merger related expenses of $16.5 million and an advance prepayment fee of $136,000 with a combined after-tax cost of $11.8 million, or $0.51 per diluted share. Amounts and performance ratios for 2015 include merger related expenses of $1.9 million with an after-tax cost of $1.3 million, or $0.08 per diluted share. Amounts and performance ratios for 2013 include expenses related to the prepayment of advances of $4.3 million and the consolidation of two branches into newer, in-market facilities, at a cost of $579,000 with a combined after-tax cost of $3.1 million, or $0.19 per diluted share. OceanFirst Milestones—115 Years of Growth Founded Point Pleasant, NJ OceanFirst Foundation Exceeds $25 Million in Cumulative Grants Cape Bancorp Acquired Ocean Shore Holding Co. Acquired IPO to Mutual Depositors Created OceanFirst Foundation Colonial American Bank Acquired 1902 1985 1996 1999 2000 2014 2015 2016 2017 Branch Expansion into Middlesex County Branch Expansion into Monmouth County Commercial LPO Expansion into Mercer County Established Commercial Lending Established Trust and Asset Management O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C Letter to SharehoLderS April 11, 2017 Dear Fellow Shareholders: 2016 proved to be a transformative year for our Company. OceanFirst continued to build on its successful strategy by employing our relationship-focused community bank model while also completing two significant acquisitions. The acquisition of Cape Bank provided excellent deposit funding, enabling OceanFirst to expand throughout southern New Jersey and westward into the Philadelphia metropolitan area, introducing important new markets for our commercial lending business, and providing the additional operating scale to compete in an increasingly complex environment. The Cape Bank acquisition was announced in January 2016, closed in May 2016, and was fully integrated into the OceanFirst family in October 2016. The Ocean City Home Bank acquisition provided the rare and unique opportunity to welcome more customers and staff along the southern New Jersey shore while also strengthening the Bank’s residential lending business, a business in which Ocean City Home Bank had excelled. The Ocean City Home Bank acquisition was announced in July 2016, closed in November 2016, and the full integration is on schedule for completion in May 2017. Each of these individual transactions would have been worthy on its own merits; however, the combination of both delivered enhanced value for our franchise. Strategic Growth $5.2 Building Earnings Momentum Total assets at the Bank have grown 99% in 2016 and now exceed $5.1 billion, making OceanFirst the dominant community bank in central and southern New Jersey and one of the largest banks headquartered in New Jersey. The best illustration of the future earnings performance $35.0 $1.49 of our franchise is the growth in core earnings.(1) The core earnings run rate in the fourth quarter $2.3 $19.4 $20.0 $2.6 $2.4 $21.6 of 2016 was $10.6 million, an 86% increase over 1.5 the $5.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. 1.2 0.9 This improvement in earnings translated into 0.6 $1.14 $1.29 $1.19 a 15% increase in core earnings per share and 0.3 0.0 supported an increase in our quarterly cash dividend to $0.15 per share, which is also a 15% increase over the prior year. Of course, the goal of increasing shareholder value is ongoing and we plan to continue to improve operating 2013 2014 2015 2016 Core Diluted Earnings Per Share (1) Annual Core Earnings In millions Total Assets In billions performance as these integrations mature. (1) Refer to footnote on previous page O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 The external environment was volatile throughout the Dollars in thousands year, especially in the period since the presidential election in November. The year-end economic outlook strengthened, as evidenced by strong employment gains, a significant boost to consumer and corporate OCFC Stock Price $30.03 $20.03 confidence, and the Federal Reserve Bank’s adoption of a tighter monetary policy. As we discussed at length $17.13 $17.14 in the 2014 Annual Report, the Bank has carefully and deliberately been managing interest rate risk for the past several years, a practice that certainly had dampened short-term profitability. However, careful management of deposit funding costs, conservative loan terms, and the acquisition of two well-funded banks combined to put the Bank in an enviable 2013 2014 2015 2016 position as the interest rate cycle appears to be turning. Total shareholder return for the year of 54% was exceptional as the market valued the future opportunities for our franchise and acknowledged the care that we have implemented in completing the acquisitions to date. Commercial Banking The lending landscape in 2016 was complicated by two factors. Economic conditions in the first half of the year appeared to be weakening while the integration of Dollars in thousands acquired loan portfolios in the second half of the year required that we take action to ensure the Bank’s 2.88% Improving Asset Quality balance sheet would demonstrate the conservative credit risk position that is central to our risk management strategy. Asset quality improved dramatically during the year as non-performing loans as a percent of total loans decreased from 0.91% of total loans to just 0.35%, a reduction of 61%. The strategy to reduce credit risk was especially important as there was significant uncertainty regarding economic conditions during the election year. However, the workout of underperforming 1.06% 0.91% 0.35% 2013 2014 2015 2016 Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0% loans, loan sales, and portfolio management activities resulted in modest loan portfolio attrition in the second half of 2016. Loan originations were strong, with $483 million in total loan originations throughout 2016, and the year ended with a strong pipeline entering 2017. Loan portfolio growth in 2017 is targeted to return to the pace we achieved during 2013 through 2016. Deposit Growth Deposit growth was strong, both organically and as a result of the acquisition of two high quality deposit portfolios. Organic deposit growth totaled $150 million, a respectable figure given the fierce competition for deposits in our markets. In addition, the acquisitions contributed $2.1 billion of low cost deposits. Deposit retention has been strong as the deposit bases acquired Excellent Deposit Funding Dollars in millions, as of December 31, 2016 Total Deposits $4,188 from Colonial American Bank, Cape Bank, and Ocean City Home Bank have all experienced Money Market & Savings $1,131 Non-Interest Checking $783 net deposit growth since each acquisition. The result of our disciplined approach to deposit gathering has produced a deposit profile that should prove valuable in the event interest rates increase, as expected in the coming quarters. Certificates of Deposit $647 Interest Checking $1,627 Direct Banking and Branch Distribution Consumer preferences continue to place a high value on convenience. However, the customers’ definition of convenience is rapidly changing with an emphasis on accessibility through mobile devices, alternative payment systems, and digital, rather than paper-based communications. The Bank has made substantial investments in customer delivery technology but must also offset those investments by transforming the retail bank branch. Our goal is to provide excellent customer service within an efficient delivery model. For several years the Bank has been consolidating locations and introducing new services, such as the interactive teller machines. As we better understand our customers’ use of these technologies, we have identified the opportunity to consolidate full-time staffed physical locations while introducing a wider use of video enabled service points. This trend allows us to continue to serve all of our markets, while reducing the number of physical branches that closely overlap. The branch consolidations that were announced in February will result in ten fewer branches in the Southern Region, most of which are in close proximity to each other. We will continue to maintain convenient locations in all of the markets we serve. A similar branch consolidation is planned for the Central Region, with the same emphasis on investing in digital service points for the Bank’s customers and continuing to serve all of our markets. O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C Capital Management Capital management is a critical function that allows our Company to balance the need to demonstrate a strong capital position while funding prudent growth initiatives and understanding that excess capital positions should be returned to our investors. During 2016 the Bank demonstrated strong absolute capital levels while managing to deploy a significant amount of capital in the acquisitions, increased the quarterly dividend by 15%, and executed a more modest stock buyback program as we balanced those needs. Over the coming years, the external environment appears to indicate that favorable growth opportunities will be available to the Bank, thus creating a bias towards retaining a material percentage of earnings to support growth opportunities. Our dividend philosophy will remain on track with a targeted core earnings payout ratio of approximately 30 to 40% and dividend growth should be expected to loosely parallel core earnings growth over the long term. Share repurchases will be a low priority and will be pursued on an opportunistic basis. Balancing safety and soundness, funding growth initiatives, and providing effective shareholder returns will continue to be the priority of the Company’s capital management philosophy. Board and Management Development As we move forward in 2017, it is important to mark the retirement of John R. Garbarino from our Board of Directors, effective at the annual shareholder meeting in June. John’s contributions to the Company and to our community have left an indelible imprint. John joined Ocean Federal Savings in 1971, a prosperous but modest, local Savings and Loan. Rising through the leadership ranks, he transformed the company into a diversified community bank and a respected and high performing, publicly traded company. John was the driving force behind the creation of the OceanFirst Foundation, the first charitable foundation in the United States to be formed by a mutual savings bank as part of its initial public offering. The Foundation’s original endowment of $13 million in OceanFirst stock has blossomed, generating over $30 million worth of grants distributed to support non-profits throughout our community, while the Foundation’s remaining assets were valued at $39 million at year end 2016. Indirectly, the genius of John’s approach has been widely copied by banks throughout the nation, resulting in hundreds of millons of dollars being granted to local non-profit organizations across the country. His leadership radically transformed the Company and has touched the lives of tens of thousands of people. Every generation stands on the shoulders of those that come before us and we are quite fortunate to have had the opportunity to stand on John’s. O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C The exciting changes at OceanFirst extend far beyond the balance sheet or income statement. As a result of conventional recruiting and the acquisition of talent due to acquisitions, the Company has grown to 800+ professionals. The Board of Directors has expanded to welcome four new Directors as a result of the acquisitions in 2016: Michael Devlin from Cape Bank, and Steven Brady, Dorothy McCrosson, and Samuel Young from Ocean City Home Bank. As a result, our previously strong Board was reinforced with a new contingent of Directors with vast and varied experience that will be invaluable as we develop the premier community bank in our markets. The officers and staff faced a challenging year in 2016 as the Bank doubled in size and we undertook the significant challenges of integrating two new banks nearly simultaneously. This resulted in long hours, weekend and holiday work, complex project plans, and tested our infrastructure in many ways. I am quite proud of our employees and the results of these projects. Hundreds of staff dedicated tens of thousands of hours to ensure that our new employees, customers, and shareholders received a warm welcome into the OceanFirst family. Our expanded employee base shares the OceanFirst Vision for providing extraordinary community banking and will make a material difference as we compete in new markets. Our Clients Finally, the prosperity of our Company will always rely on the extraordinary relationships we maintain with our customers. This year’s report has been expanded to provide even more customers with an opportunity to share their banking experiences with OceanFirst. We are humbled by their words on the following pages and will continue to strive to exceed their expectations in the years ahead. Our Company continues to build on the successes of 2016. We remain excited about the Company’s future and appreciate the support and confidence you demonstrate by investing in OceanFirst. Sincerely, Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C american BaSeBall company, llc Joseph Finley & Joseph Caruso—Owners The Lakewood BlueClaws, a minor league affiliate of the Philadelphia Phillies, have been entertaining residents and visitors at the Jersey Shore since 2001. More than 6.7 million fans have enjoyed watching future Phillies legends begin their baseball careers and cheering on several South Atlantic League Championship teams. The ballpark is a destination when the team is on the road and during the off-season with the BlueClaws staff providing plenty of special events for all to experience. The community also benefits from the generosity of American Baseball Company through BlueClaws Charities which helps thousands of our neighbors in need. “OceanFirst Bank has been one of our most valued business partners for 16 years, since the team’s inception in 2001. OceanFirst has assisted the BlueClaws in financing major capital expenditures throughout the stadium and without their contributions, much of what we are able to offer and present to our fans would not be possible. Everyone from the corporate offices to the local branches have been helpful and accommodating beyond description. We’ve enjoyed this unique partnership and relationship with OceanFirst Bank and look forward to many more prosperous years to come.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C c+K plaSticS, inc. llc Robert Carrier, President Founded in 1963, C+K Plastics provides innovative and cost-effective solutions in most any thermoformed application. From an 85,000 square-foot, state-of-the-art headquarters located in Metuchen, New Jersey—and a Georgia facility added in 2016—C+K Plastics helps clients take projects from concept to finished product. With more than 130 years of collective thermoforming knowledge on staff, C+K Plastics is one of the most experienced companies in the industry and is continually striving to stay on the leading edge of new technological advancements. “OceanFirst Bank has been a critical part of C+K Plastics’ success. They understand our needs and concerns, and we value their unwavering support. Our partnership, and their willingness to believe in our mission and expansion strategy, have made it possible for C+K to look forward with optimism and confidence.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C Harold import co. Robert Laub, President For the past 60 years, HIC, Harold Import Co., has built a reputation as a family-owned and operated wholesaler of fine cooking tools, supplies and equipment that is committed to the belief that quality, value and superior customer service never go out of style. Today, HIC carries over 3,500 home and commercial cooking supplies that are imported from 25 countries on five continents, and sold online and in over 10,000 stores worldwide. Distribution includes several of the company’s own brands including: HIC, Mrs. Anderson’s Baking®, Helen Chen’s Asian Kitchen®, Fante’s Italian Home Cooking, The World’s Greatest™ Gadgets, Beyond Gourmet, and Elizabeth Karmel’s Grill Friends®. capabilities of a large international bank. HIC does business in over 50 countries around the world, and “OceanFirst gives us the personal service of a local community bank while also providing us with the OceanFirst has consistently proven to be more than able to handle all of our needs locally and globally.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C JoSepH Fazzio, inc. Christopher P. Fazzio, President In 1965, Joseph Fazzio, Inc. was established in Glassboro, NJ. Today, the original facility remains; however, the company has expanded significantly and also has a Monmouth County facility in Wall Township. Combined, the sites encompass 50 acres of land and over 350,000 square feet of building space. Focusing on industrial hardware, steel and metals, Joseph Fazzio’s has 36,000 tons of inventory available onsite or online at shopjfi.com. Joseph Fazzio’s is a one-stop resource for their customers, delivering great service from their experienced team led by the Fazzio family. commitment to prosper and grow together. We value the relationship we have with our lending team at OceanFirst “Our business spans several generations of the Fazzio family all focused on serving our customers with a and appreciate working with experienced bankers who understand our vision for Joseph Fazzio, Inc.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C maSSarelli Mario Massarelli, President It’s been 45 years since Mario Massarelli established Massarelli’s when he was 17 years old. Today, Massarelli’s, makers of fine stone garden accents, has a 100,000 square foot manufacturing facility plus a storage warehouse and showroom located in Hammonton, NJ. A leader in the garden center industry, this family-owned and operated business serves nearly 2,000 independent dealers throughout the United States and Canada. Massarelli’s boasts an extensive selection of quality products to exceed the expectations of their many thousands of customers while remaining focused on their number one goal of complete customer satisfaction. “Massarelli’s has built our reputation by delivering quality products with great service. We understand what it takes to exceed customer expectations, so for the banking needs of our business and our family we have high standards. We rely on our banking team at OceanFirst to provide us with competitive banking products while keeping the individualized touch of service that we expect.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C monmoutH univerSity Grey Dimenna, Esq., President Monmouth University offers a welcoming and dynamic coastal campus setting for student development fostered by critical thinking. Known for its innovative academic programs, individual faculty attention, and nationally ranked Division I athletics, this private university is consistently recognized in U.S. News & World Report rankings of “Best Colleges.” Monmouth’s beautiful campus sits at the heart of a vibrant region rich in history, the arts, technology and entrepreneurship. Its renowned faculty are actively involved in advancing academic research nationwide while encouraging meaningful community involvement and immersive learning experiences that extend beyond the classroom. “OceanFirst Bank has demonstrated a strong commitment to our students and our neighbors over many years. Their ongoing leadership in the community, commitment to growth, and strong support of grants and scholarships for our students make them an outstanding partner. We are also proud that our showcase campus arena is named the OceanFirst Bank Center, which resonates so well with our coastal location.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C St. auguStine preparatory ScHool Fr. Donald F. Reilly, O.S.A., President Located in southern New Jersey, St. Augustine Preparatory School educates young men from grades nine through twelve. Established in 1959 with 27 students, today there are approximately 700 students traveling from seven counties for an education driven by Catholic and Augustinian values. The campus has grown over the years, adding buildings to support an enhanced academic, cultural and athletic experience. The young men who attend the Prep proudly wear their very recognizable blue blazers and continue into college and throughout life committed to: “Setting hearts on fire with a passionate search for Truth, Unity and Love.” “OceanFirst Bank has been a trusted partner in securing the necessary resources to transform the St. Augustine Prep campus into a vibrant educational environment. Expansion and growth have been a staple of our culture, and with the banking resources OceanFirst has provided we have been able to build for students today, and future generations of Hermit Brothers.” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C SurF taco Rob Nagel, Founder and President Surf Taco opened their first location in Point Pleasant Beach on Memorial Day in 2001. Today there are 10 locations throughout Ocean and Monmouth counties plus the most recent shop in Middlesex County at Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Surf Taco’s secret recipe includes a combination of Good Food, Good People, and Good Vibes. The Surf Taco team is committed to consistently delivering fresh and tasty food in a cool, casual environment, flowing with positive energy. They aim to feed the heart and soul of their customers in order to create the ultimate dining experience. “OceanFirst has played an integral role in Surf Taco’s growth. They have been a supportive, knowledgeable and progressive community bank that understood our needs and goals. The OceanFirst team worked seamlessly and professionally to provide information and capital for our growth. We admire OceanFirst’s commitment to service in the communities they serve. We look forward to working together as we expand to new locations. Eat Tacoooos!” O C E A N F I R S T F I N A N C I A L C O R P. N A S D A Q : O C F C 2016 FORM 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission file number: 001-11713 OceanFirst Financial Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 22-3412577 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 975 Hooper Avenue, Toms River, New Jersey 08753 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 240-4500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Title of class) The Nasdaq Global Select Market (Name of each exchange on which registered) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No . . Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No . Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No . Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No . The aggregate market fair value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, i.e., persons other than the directors and executive officers of the registrant, was $444,843,000 based upon the closing price of such common equity as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of March 8, 2017 was 32,392,685. Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days from December 31, 2016, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE PAGE 3 22 27 27 28 28 29 31 33 46 49 96 96 96 97 97 97 97 97 98 100 101 INDEX PART I PART II Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 8. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation PART III Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Item 16. Form 10-K Summary PART IV Signatures 2 PART I Item 1. General Business OceanFirst Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is incorporated under Delaware law and serves as the holding company for OceanFirst Bank (the “Bank”). At December 31, 2016, the Company had consolidated total assets of $5.2 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $572.0 million. The Company is a savings and loan holding company subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Currently, the Company does not transact any material business other than through its subsidiary, the Bank. The Company has been the holding company for the Bank since it acquired the stock of the Bank upon the Bank’s conversion from a Federally-chartered mutual savings bank to a Federally-chartered capital stock savings bank in 1996 (the “Conversion”). The Bank’s principal business has been and continues to be attracting retail and business deposits in the communities surrounding its branch offices and investing those deposits primarily in loans, consisting of commercial real estate and other commercial loans which have become a key focus of the Bank and single-family, owner-occupied residential mortgage loans. The Bank also invests in other types of loans, including residential construction and consumer loans. In addition, the Bank invests in mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), securities issued by the U.S. Government and agencies thereof, corporate securities and other investments permitted by applicable law and regulations. The Bank’s revenues are derived principally from interest on its loans, and to a lesser extent, interest on its investment and mortgage-backed securities. The Bank also receives income from fees and service charges on loan and deposit products, Bankcard services, wealth management services and the sale of alternative investment products, e.g., mutual funds, annuities and life insurance. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, investment maturities, proceeds from the sale of loans, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances and other borrowings. The Company’s website address is www.oceanfirst.com. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge through its website, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The Company’s website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical information, this Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “will”, “should”, “may”, “view”, “opportunity”, “potential”, or similar expressions or expressions of confidence. The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, those items discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors herein and the following: changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, levels of unemployment in the Bank’s lending area, real estate market values in the Bank’s lending area, future natural disasters and increases to flood insurance premiums, the level of prepayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the FRB, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Company’s market area, accounting principles and guidelines and the Bank's ability to successfully integrate acquired operations. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. Market Area and Competition The Bank is a community-oriented financial institution, offering a wide variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. The Bank conducts its business through an administrative/branch office located in Toms River, New Jersey, and sixty additional branch offices and two deposit production facilities located throughout Central and Southern New Jersey. The Bank also operates a wealth management office in Manchester, New Jersey and commercial loan production offices in the Philadelphia area and Mercer County, New Jersey. The Bank’s deposit gathering and lending activities are concentrated in the markets surrounding its branch office network. 3 The Bank is the largest and oldest community-based financial institution headquartered in Ocean County, New Jersey, approximately midway between New York City and Philadelphia. The economy in the Bank’s primary market area, which represents the broader Central and Southern New Jersey market, is based upon a mixture of service and retail trade. Other employment is provided by a variety of wholesale trade, manufacturing, Federal, state and local government, hospitals and utilities. The area is also home to commuters working in areas in and around New York City and Philadelphia. The market area includes a significant number of vacation and second homes in the communities along the New Jersey shore. The Bank’s future growth opportunities will be partly influenced by the growth and stability of its geographic marketplace and the competitive environment. The Bank faces significant competition both in making loans and in attracting deposits. The state of New Jersey, and the Bank's primary market areas of Central and Southern New Jersey, is an attractive market to many financial institutions. Many of the Bank’s competitors are branches of significantly larger institutions headquartered out-of-market which have greater financial resources than the Bank. The Bank’s competition for loans comes principally from commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, internet-based providers and insurance companies. Its most direct competition for deposits has historically come from commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions although the Bank also faces competition for deposits from short-term money market funds, other corporate and government securities funds, internet-only providers and from other financial service institutions such as brokerage firms and insurance companies. The Bank distinguishes itself from large banking competitors through its local presence and ability to deliver personalized service. Community Involvement The Bank proudly promotes a higher quality of life in the communities it serves through employee volunteer efforts and the work of OceanFirst Foundation (the “Foundation”). Employees are continually encouraged to become leaders in their communities and use the Bank’s support to help others. Through the Foundation, established in 1996, OceanFirst has donated $30 million to enrich the lives of local citizens by supporting initiatives in health and human services, education, affordable housing, youth development and the arts. Acquisitions On July 31, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Colonial American Bank (“Colonial American”), which added $142.4 million to assets, $121.2 million to loans, and $123.3 million to deposits. The in-market acquisition strengthened the Bank’s position in the attractive Monmouth County, New Jersey marketplace by adding offices in Middletown and Shrewsbury, New Jersey. On March 11, 2016, the Bank purchased an existing retail branch located in the Toms River market with total deposits of $17.0 million. On May 2, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Cape Bancorp, Inc. ("Cape") which added $1.5 billion to assets, $1.2 billion to loans, and $1.2 billion to deposits. The transaction was a market extension, creating a preeminent New Jersey based community banking franchise operating throughout Central and Southern New Jersey while also providing a gateway into the demographically attractive Philadelphia metropolitan area. On November 30, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Ocean Shore Holding Company ("Ocean Shore") which added $995.9 million to assets, $875.1 million to deposits, and $774.0 million to loans. The in-market transaction solidified the Bank's position as the premier banking franchise in Central and Southern New Jersey with a strong core deposit franchise and enhanced operating scale. While the Bank intends to concentrate on integrating its recent acquisitions, reducing non-interest expenses and on organic growth, the Company will continue to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities for those that are expected to create shareholder value. Lending Activities Loan Portfolio Composition. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had total loans outstanding of $3.831 billion, of which $1.653 billion, or 43.2% of total loans were one-to-four family, residential mortgage loans. The remainder of the portfolio consisted of $1.669 billion of commercial real estate, multi-family and land loans, or 43.6% of total loans; $65.4 million of residential construction loans, or 1.7% of total loans; $290.7 million of consumer loans, primarily home equity loans and lines of credit, or 7.6% of total loans; and, $152.8 million of commercial loans, or 4.0% of total loans. Included in total loans are $1.6 million in loans held-for-sale at December 31, 2016. At that same date, 31.5% of the Bank’s total loans had adjustable interest rates. The types of loans that the Bank may originate are subject to Federal and state law and regulations. Interest rates charged by the Bank on loans are affected by the demand for such loans and the supply of money available for lending purposes and the rates offered by 4 competitors. These factors are, in turn, affected by, among other things, economic conditions, monetary policies of the Federal government, including the FRB, and legislative tax policies. The following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a percentage of the portfolio at the dates indicated. At December 31, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total (dollars in thousands) Real estate: One-to-four family $ 1,653,246 43.15% $ 793,946 39.68% $ 742,090 43.07% $ 751,370 47.79% $ 809,705 52.24% Commercial real estate, multi-family and land Residential construction Consumer (1) Commercial and industrial 1,668,872 43.56 818,445 40.90 649,951 37.73 528,945 33.64 475,155 30.66 65,408 290,676 152,810 1.71 7.59 3.99 50,757 193,160 144,788 2.54 9.65 7.23 47,552 2.76 30,821 1.96 9,013 0.58 199,349 83,946 11.57 4.87 200,683 60,545 12.76 3.85 198,143 57,967 12.78 3.74 Total loans 3,831,012 100.00% 2,001,096 100.00% 1,722,888 100.00% 1,572,364 100.00% 1,549,983 100.00% Loans in process Deferred origination costs, net (14,249) 3,414 Allowance for loan losses (15,183) Total loans, net 3,804,994 Less: Loans held for sale 1,551 Loans receivable, net $ 3,803,443 Total loans: (14,206) 3,232 (16,722) 1,973,400 (16,731) 3,207 (16,317) 1,693,047 (12,715) 3,526 (20,930) 1,542,245 (3,639) 4,112 (20,510) 1,529,946 2,697 $ 1,970,703 4,201 $ 1,688,846 785 $ 1,541,460 6,746 $ 1,523,200 Adjustable rate $ 1,207,247 31.51% $ 765,022 38.23% $ 651,566 37.82% $ 602,976 38.35% $ 635,264 40.99% Fixed rate 2,623,765 68.49 1,236,074 61.77 1,071,322 62.18 969,388 61.65 914,719 59.01 $ 3,831,012 100.00% $ 2,001,096 100.00% $ 1,722,888 100.00% $ 1,572,364 100.00% $ 1,549,983 100.00% (1) Consists primarily of home equity loans and lines of credit, and to a lesser extent, loans on savings accounts and overdraft lines of credit. 5 Loan Maturity. The following table shows the contractual maturity of the Bank’s total loans at December 31, 2016. The table does not include principal prepayments. At December 31, 2016 One-to- four family Commercial real estate, multi-family and land Residential construction (1) Consumer Commercial and industrial Total loans receivable $ 1,544 $ 236,204 $ (in thousands) 61,491 $ 3,813 $ 49,733 $ 352,785 13,662 13,678 95,764 483,080 1,045,518 1,651,702 339,575 349,286 494,419 164,468 84,920 1,432,668 3,585 — — — 332 3,917 11,066 11,466 72,326 187,747 4,258 286,863 $ 1,653,246 $ 1,668,872 $ 65,408 $ 290,676 $ 31,076 23,399 21,735 10,950 15,917 103,077 152,810 398,964 397,829 684,244 846,245 1,150,945 3,478,227 3,831,012 (14,249) 3,414 (15,183) 3,804,994 1,551 $ 3,803,443 One year or less After one year: More than one year to three years More than three years to five years More than five years to ten years More than ten years to twenty years More than twenty years Total due after December 31, 2017 Total amount due Loans in process Deferred origination costs, net Allowance for loan losses Loans receivable, net Less: Loans held for sale Total loans, net (1) Residential construction loans are primarily originated on a construction/permanent basis with such loans converting to an amortizing loan following the completion of the construction phase. The following table sets forth at December 31, 2016, the dollar amount of total loans receivable, contractually due after December 31, 2017, and whether such loans have fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates. Real estate loans: One-to-four family Commercial real estate, multi-family and land Residential construction Consumer Commercial and industrial Total loans receivable Due After December 31, 2017 Fixed Adjustable (in thousands) Total $ $ 1,234,389 $ 417,313 $ 944,335 3,489 137,872 62,066 488,333 428 148,991 41,011 1,651,702 1,432,668 3,917 286,863 103,077 2,382,151 $ 1,096,076 $ 3,478,227 6 Origination, Sale and Servicing of Loans. The following table sets forth the Bank’s loan originations, purchases, sales, principal repayments and loan activity, including loans held-for-sale, for the periods indicated. Total loans: Beginning balance Loans originated: One-to-four family Commercial real estate, multi-family and land Residential construction Consumer Commercial and industrial Total loans originated Loans purchased Net loans acquired in acquisition Total Less: Principal repayments Sales of loans Charge-offs (gross) Transfer to other real estate owned Total loans 2016 For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands) 2014 $ 2,001,096 $ 1,722,888 $ 1,572,364 135,107 122,806 42,805 43,780 138,495 482,993 37,561 1,930,853 4,452,503 536,432 78,736 4,490 1,833 124,225 187,454 48,558 48,594 76,931 485,762 21,992 121,466 107,816 193,025 50,556 52,070 50,833 454,300 20,363 — 2,352,108 2,047,027 294,284 48,614 1,135 6,979 249,704 62,318 7,828 4,289 $ 3,831,012 $ 2,001,096 $ 1,722,888 One-to-Four Family Mortgage Lending. The Bank offers both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage (“ARM”) loans secured by one- to-four family residences with maturities up to 30 years. The majority of such loans are secured by property located in the Bank’s primary market area. Loan originations are typically generated by commissioned loan representatives in the exclusive employment of the Bank and their contacts within the local real estate industry, members of the local communities and the Bank’s existing or past customers. On occasion the Bank purchases loans originated by other banks. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s total loans outstanding were $3.831 billion, of which $1.653 billion, or 43.2%, were one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, primarily single family and owner occupied. To a lesser extent and included in this activity are residential mortgage loans secured by seasonal second homes and non-owner occupied investment properties. The average size of the Bank’s one-to-four family mortgage loans was approximately $181,000 at December 31, 2016. The Bank currently offers a number of ARM loan programs with interest rates which adjust every three, five or ten years. The Bank’s ARM loans generally provide for periodic caps of 2% or 3% and an overall cap of 6% on the increase or decrease in the interest rate at any adjustment date and over the life of the loan. The interest rate on these loans is indexed to the applicable three-, five- or ten-year U.S. Treasury constant maturity yield, with a repricing margin which ranges generally from 2.75% to 3.50% above the index. The Bank also offers three-, five-, seven- and ten-year ARM loans which operate as fixed-rate loans for the first three, five, seven or ten years and then convert to one-year ARM loans for the remainder of the term. The ARM loans are then indexed to a margin of generally 2.75% to 3.50% above the one-year U.S. Treasury constant maturity yield. Generally, ARM loans pose credit risks different than risks inherent in fixed-rate loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the payments of the borrower rise, thereby increasing the potential for delinquency and default. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying property may be adversely affected by higher interest rates. In order to minimize risks, borrowers of ARM loans with an initial fixed period of five years or less must qualify based on the greater of the note rate plus 2% or the fully-indexed rate. Seven- to ten-year ARMs must qualify based on the note rate. The Bank does not originate ARM loans which provide for negative amortization. The Bank’s fixed-rate mortgage loans are currently made for terms from 10 to 30 years. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2014, the Bank generally retained the servicing on loans sold. Currently, servicing rights are generally sold as part of the loan sale. The Bank generally holds for its portfolio shorter-term, fixed-rate loans and certain longer-term, fixed-rate loans, generally consisting of loans with balances exceeding the conforming loan limits of the government agencies (“Jumbo” loans) and loans to officers, directors or employees of the Bank. The Bank may retain a portion of its longer-term, fixed-rate loans after considering volume and yield and after evaluating interest rate risk and capital management considerations. The retention of fixed-rate mortgage loans may increase the level of interest rate risk exposure of the Bank, as the rates on these loans will not adjust during periods of rising interest rates and the loans can be subject to substantial increases in prepayments during periods of falling interest rates. During the past several years, the Bank has generally sold 7 much of its 30-year, fixed-rate, one-to-four family loans into the secondary market primarily to manage interest rate risk. With the recent rise in market interest rates and the reduction in refinance volume, the Bank anticipates retaining most of its 30-year fixed-rate loan originations in 2017 to replace anticipated repayments of the existing residential loan portfolio. The Bank’s policy is to originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans in amounts up to 80% of the lower of the appraised value or the selling price of the property securing the loan and up to 95% of the appraised value or selling price if private mortgage insurance is obtained. Appraisals are obtained for loans secured by real estate properties. The weighted average loan-to-value ratio of the Bank’s one-to-four family mortgage loans was 55.5% at December 31, 2016 based on appraisal values at the time of origination. Title insurance is typically required for first mortgage loans. Mortgage loans originated by the Bank include due-on-sale clauses which provide the Bank with the contractual right to declare the loan immediately due and payable in the event the borrower transfers ownership of the property without the Bank’s consent. Due-on-sale clauses are an important means of adjusting the rates on the Bank’s fixed-rate mortgage loan portfolio and the Bank has generally exercised its rights under these clauses. The Bank currently brokers reverse mortgage loans for a third-party originator. The loans qualify under the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program of the Federal Housing Administration and are insured by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bank recognized fee income on reverse mortgage loans of $95,000, as compared to $233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Bank has made, and may continue to make, residential mortgage loans that will not qualify as Qualified Mortgage Loans under the Dodd-Frank Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) regulations. See “Risk Factors – The Dodd-Frank Act imposes obligations on originators of residential mortgage loans, such as the Bank.” Commercial Real Estate, Multi-Family and Land Lending. The Bank originates commercial real estate loans that are secured by properties, or properties under construction, generally used for business purposes such as office, industrial or retail facilities. A substantial majority of the Bank’s commercial real estate loans are located in its primary market area. The Bank’s underwriting procedures provide that commercial real estate loans may be made in amounts up to 80% of the appraised value of the property. The Bank generally originates commercial real estate loans with terms of up to ten years and amortization schedules up to thirty years with fixed or adjustable rates. The loans typically contain prepayment penalties over the initial term. In reaching its decision on whether to make a commercial real estate loan, the Bank considers the net operating income of the property and the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability among other factors. The Bank has generally required that the properties securing commercial real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios of at least 130%. The Bank generally requires the personal guarantee of the principal borrowers for commercial real estate loans. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio at December 31, 2016 was $1.669 billion, or 43.6% of total loans, as compared to $818.4 million, or 40.9% of total loans, at December 31, 2015. The Bank continues to grow this market segment primarily through the addition of experienced commercial lenders and has commercial lending teams in Monmouth, Atlantic, Cape May, and Mercer Counties and in the Philadelphia area. Of the total commercial real estate portfolio, 32.0% is considered owner-occupied, whereby the underlying business owner occupies a majority of the property. The average size of the Bank’s commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2016 was approximately $778,000. The commercial real estate portfolio includes loans for the construction of commercial properties. Typically, these loans are underwritten based upon commercial leases in place prior to funding. In many cases, commercial construction loans are extended to owners that intend to occupy the property for business operations, in which case the loan is based upon the financial capacity of the related business and the owner of the business. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had an outstanding balance in commercial construction loans of $123.2 million, as compared to $29.2 million at December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the acquisitions of Cape and Ocean Shore and commercial construction loan origination opportunities in the Bank's local market. The Bank also originates multi-family mortgage loans and land loans on a limited basis. The Bank’s multi-family loans and land loans at December 31, 2016 totaled $34.8 million and $7.7 million, respectively, as compared to $28.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015. Residential Construction Lending. At December 31, 2016, residential construction loans totaled $65.4 million, or 1.7%, of the Bank’s total loans outstanding. The Bank originates residential construction loans primarily on a construction/permanent basis with such loans converting to an amortizing loan following the completion of the construction phase. Most of the Bank’s residential construction loans are made to individuals building a residence. Construction lending, by its nature, entails additional risks compared to one-to-four family mortgage lending, attributable primarily to the fact that funds are advanced based upon a security interest in a project which is not yet complete. The Bank addresses these risks through its underwriting policies and procedures and its experienced staff. 8 Consumer Loans. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s consumer loans totaled $290.7 million, or 7.6% of the Bank’s total loan portfolio. Of the total consumer loan portfolio, home equity loans comprised $149.8 million; home equity lines of credit comprised $143.4 million; overdraft line of credit loans totaled $771,000; loans on savings accounts and other consumer loans totaled $785,000. There was also $4.1 million of unaccreted fair value marks on the consumer loan portfolio. The Bank originates home equity loans typically as fixed-rate loans with terms ranging from 5 to 20 years. The Bank also offers variable- rate home equity lines of credit. Home equity loans and lines of credit are based on the applicant’s income and their ability to repay and are secured by a mortgage on the underlying real estate, typically owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences. Generally, the loan when combined with the balance of any applicable first mortgage lien, may not exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property at the time of the loan commitment. The Bank charges an early termination fee should a home equity loan or line of credit be closed within two or three years of origination. A borrower is required to make monthly payments of principal and interest, at a minimum of $50, based upon a 10-, 15- or 20-year amortization period. Certain home equity lines of credit require the payment of interest-only during the first five years with fully-amortizing payments thereafter. At December 31, 2016, these loans totaled $41.4 million, as compared to $15.7 million at December 31, 2015. Generally, the adjustable rate of interest charged is based upon the prime rate of interest (as published in the Wall Street Journal), although the range of interest rates charged may vary from 1.0% below prime to 1.5% over prime. The loans have an 18% lifetime cap on interest rate adjustments. Commercial and Industrial Lending. At December 31, 2016, commercial and industrial (“C&I”) loans totaled $152.8 million, or 4.0% of the Bank’s total loans outstanding. The Bank originates commercial and industrial loans and lines of credit (including for working capital; fixed asset purchases; and acquisition, receivable and inventory financing) primarily in the Bank’s market area. In underwriting commercial and industrial loans and credit lines, the Bank reviews and analyzes financial history and capacity, collateral value, strength and character of the principals, and general payment history of the principal borrowers in coming to a credit decision. The Bank generally originates C&I loans secured by the assets of the business including accounts receivable, inventory, fixtures, etc. The Bank generally requires the personal guarantee of the principal borrowers for all commercial and industrial loans. Commercial and industrial business lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than real estate lending. Risk of loss on a commercial and industrial business loan is dependent largely on the borrower’s ability to remain financially able to repay the loan from ongoing operations. The average size of the Bank’s commercial and industrial loans at December 31, 2016 was approximately $261,000. Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. The Board establishes the loan approval policies of the Bank based on total exposure to the individual borrower. The Board has authorized the approval of loans by various officers of the Bank or a Management Credit Committee, on a scale which requires approval by personnel with progressively higher levels of responsibility as the loan amount increases. Pursuant to applicable regulations, loans to one borrower generally cannot exceed 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital. At December 31, 2016 this limit amounted to $66.8 million. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s maximum loan exposure to a single borrower was a $22.3 million relationship secured by pledges and assignments of notes receivables and various real estate collateral. Due to the recent acquisitions, a majority of the loan portfolio was underwritten under the underwriting standards and guidelines of the acquired bank. Acquired loans have been evaluated under OceanFirst's credit risk management policies during pre-closing due diligence and during post-closing risk rating reviews. In addition to internal credit reviews, the Bank has engaged an independent firm specializing in commercial loan reviews to examine a selection of commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, and provide management with objective analysis regarding the quality of these loans throughout the year. The independent firm reviewed more than 60% of the Company’s commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans during 2016. Their conclusion was that the Bank’s internal credit reviews are consistent with both Bank policy and general industry practice. Loan Servicing. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and interest, making inspections as required of mortgaged premises, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans. The Bank also services mortgage loans for others. On October 31, 2014, the Bank sold most of the servicing rights on residential mortgage loans serviced for Federal agencies, recognizing a net gain of $408,000. Smaller sales in 2015 resulted in a net gain of $111,000. All of the remaining loans currently being serviced for others are loans which were originated by the Bank. At December 31, 2016, the Bank was servicing $137.9 million of loans for others. At December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, the balance of the Bank’s Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”) totaled $228,000, $589,000, and $701,000, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, loan servicing income totaled $250,000, $268,000, and $816,000, respectively. The Bank evaluates the MSR for impairment on a quarterly basis. No impairment was recognized for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014. The valuation of MSR is determined through a discounted analysis of future cash flows, incorporating numerous assumptions which are subject to significant change in the near term. Generally, a decline in market interest rates will cause expected prepayment speeds to increase resulting in a lower valuation for mortgage servicing rights and ultimately lower future servicing fee income. 9 Delinquencies and Classified Assets. The steps taken by the Bank with respect to delinquencies vary depending on the nature of the loan and period of delinquency. When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan, the Bank takes a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. The Bank sends the borrower a written notice of non-payment after the loan is first past due. In the event payment is not then received, additional letters and phone calls generally are made. The Bank may offer to modify the terms or take other forbearance actions which afford the borrower an opportunity to satisfy the loan terms. If the loan is still not brought current and it becomes necessary for the Bank to take legal action, which typically occurs after a loan is delinquent at least 120 days or more, the Bank will commence litigation to realize on the collateral, including foreclosure proceedings against any real property that secures the loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or an acceptable workout accommodation is not agreed upon before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure. Foreclosure timelines in New Jersey are among the longest in the nation and have remained protracted over the past several years. The Bank’s internal Asset Classification Committee, which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, reviews and classifies the Bank’s assets quarterly and reports the results of its review to the Board. As part of this process, the Chief Risk Officer compiles a quarterly list of all criticized and classified loans, and a narrative report of classified commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, multi- family, land and construction loans. The Bank classifies assets in accordance with certain regulatory guidelines and definitions. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $70.5 million of assets, including all other real estate owned ("OREO"), classified as “Substandard”, $111,000 classified as “Doubtful” and no assets classified as “Loss.” At December 31, 2015, the Bank had $33.3 million of assets classified as “Substandard,” no assets classified as “Doubtful” and no assets classified as “Loss.” Assets which do not currently expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses, such as past delinquencies, are designated “Special Mention.” Special Mention assets totaled $15.7 million at December 31, 2016, as compared to $23.1 at December 31, 2015. Non-Accrual Loans and OREO. The following table sets forth information regarding non-accrual loans and OREO, excluding Purchase Credit Impaired (“PCI”) loans. The Bank obtained PCI loans as part of its acquisitions of Colonial American, Cape and Ocean Shore. PCI loans are accounted for at fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows with no related allowance for loan losses. PCI loans totaled $7.6 million and $461,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. It is the policy of the Bank to cease accruing interest on loans 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the amount of interest income that would have been recognized on non-accrual loans if such loans had continued to perform in accordance with their contractual terms was $391,000, $848,000, and $1,630,000, respectively. December 31, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 (dollars in thousands) Non-accrual loans: Real estate: One-to-four family $ Commercial real estate, multi-family and land Consumer Commercial and industrial Total OREO 8,126 2,935 2,064 441 13,566 9,803 $ 5,779 $ 3,115 $ 10,796 1,576 123 18,274 8,827 12,758 1,877 557 18,307 4,664 $ 28,213 12,304 4,328 515 45,360 4,345 26,521 11,567 4,540 746 43,374 3,210 Total non-performing assets $ 23,369 $ 27,101 $ 22,971 $ 49,705 $ 46,584 Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable (1) Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing loans (2) Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable (1)(2) Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets (2) 0.40% 0.84% 0.95% 1.33% 1.32% 111.92 91.51 89.13 46.14 47.29 0.35 0.45 0.91 1.05 1.06 0.97 2.88 2.21 2.80 2.05 (1) Total loans includes loans receivable and loans held for sale. (2) Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and OREO. Non-performing loans consist of all loans 90 days or more past due and other loans in the process of foreclosure. Non-performing loans totaled $13.6 million at December 31, 2016, a decrease of $4.7 million, as compared to December 31, 2015, partly due to the bulk sale of non-performing and under-performing loans during the year. Non-performing loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015 do not include $7.6 million and $461,000, respectively, of PCI loans acquired from Colonial American, Cape and Ocean Shore. The Company’s OREO totaled $9.8 million at December 31, 2016, a $976,000 increase from December 31, 2015. The amount 10 at December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes $7.0 million relating to a hotel, golf and banquet facility located in New Jersey which the Company acquired in the fourth quarter of 2015. Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. Additions to the allowance arise from charges to operations through the provision for loan losses or from the recovery of amounts previously charged-off. The allowance is reduced by loan charge-offs. A description of the methodology used in establishing the allowance for loan losses is set forth in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Critical Accounting Policies, Allowance for Loan Losses”. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bank’s allowance for loan losses was 0.40% and 0.84% respectively, of total loans. The decline in the loan coverage ratio from the prior year was primarily a result of Cape and Ocean Shore loans acquired at fair value, with no corresponding allowance. The net credit mark on all acquired loans, not reflected in the allowance for loan losses, was $26.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing loans was 111.92% at December 31, 2016, an increase from 91.51% in the prior year. The Bank had non-accrual loans of $13.6 million at December 31, 2016, a decrease from $18.3 million at December 31, 2015. The Bank will continue to monitor its allowance for loan losses as conditions dictate. The following table sets forth activity in the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the periods set forth in the table. At or for the Years Ended December 31, Balance at beginning of year $ 16,722 $ 16,317 2016 2015 2014 (dollars in thousands) $ 20,930 $ 2013 2012 20,510 $ 18,230 Charge-offs: Residential real estate Commercial real estate Consumer Commercial and industrial Total Recoveries Net charge-offs Provision for loan losses Balance at end of year Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average net loans outstanding during the year 558 3,399 349 184 4,490 328 4,162 2,623 295 103 678 59 1,135 265 870 1,275 6,955 323 471 78 7,827 584 7,243 2,630 2,444 — 842 235 3,521 1,141 2,380 2,800 4,679 47 2,282 76 7,084 1,464 5,620 7,900 $ 15,183 $ 16,722 $ 16,317 $ 20,930 $ 20,510 0.15% 0.05% 0.45% 0.16% 0.36% The increase in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to charge-offs of $2.1 million on the bulk sales of non-performing and under-performing loans. The elevated charge-offs in 2014 was due to the bulk sale of non-performing residential and consumer loans which resulted in a charge-off of $5.0 million on these loans. 11 The following table sets forth the Bank’s percent of allowance for loan losses to total allowance and the percent of loans to total loans in each of the categories listed at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands). 2016 2015 At December 31, 2014 2013 2012 Percent of Allowance to Total Allowance Amount Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans Percent of Allowance to Total Allowance Amount Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans Percent of Allowance to Total Allowance Amount Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans Percent of Allowance to Total Allowance Amount Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans Percent of Allowance to Total Allowance Amount Residential real estate Commercial real estate Consumer Commercial and industrial Unallocated Total $ 2,245 14.79% 44.86% $ 6,590 39.41% 42.22% $ 4,291 26.30% 45.83% $ 4,859 23.22% 49.75% $ 5,241 25.56% 52.82% 9,360 1,110 61.65 7.31 2,037 13.41 431 2.84 43.56 7.59 3.99 — 7,165 1,095 1,639 233 42.85 6.55 9.80 1.39 40.90 9.65 7.23 — 8,935 1,146 863 1,082 54.76 7.02 5.29 6.63 37.73 11.57 4.87 — 10,371 49.55 1,360 6.50 1,383 2,957 6.61 14.12 33.64 12.76 3.85 — 8,937 2,264 1,348 2,720 43.57 11.04 6.57 13.26 30.66 12.78 3.74 — $ 15,183 100.00% 100.00% $ 16,722 100.00% 100.00% $ 16,317 100.00% 100.00% $ 20,930 100.00% 100.00% $ 20,510 100.00% 100.00% Throughout 2014, 2015, and 2016, the Bank has refined and enhanced its assessment of the adequacy of the allowance by reviewing the look-back periods, updating the loss emergence periods, and enhancing the analysis of qualitative factors. These refinements have increased the level of precision in the allowance and the unallocated portion has declined substantially. Additionally, the reduction in the unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses in 2014 was due to the improved risk profile of the loan portfolio and related credit metrics, and the lower level of uncertainty relating to future loan losses due to the bulk sale of non-performing residential and consumer loans. Reserve for Repurchased Loans and Loss Sharing Obligations. The reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations was established to provide for expected losses related to repurchase requests which may be received on residential mortgage loans previously sold to investors. The reserve also includes an estimate of the Bank’s obligation under a loss sharing arrangement with the FHLB relating to loans sold into their Mortgage Partnership Finance (“MPF”) program. The Company prepares a comprehensive analysis of the adequacy of the reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations at each quarter-end. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company maintained a reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations of $846,000 and $986,000, respectively. Provisions for losses are charged to gain on sale of loans and credited to the reserve while actual losses are charged to the reserve. Losses were $140,000, $56,000, and $436,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. Included in the losses on loans repurchased are cash settlements in lieu of repurchases. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no outstanding loan repurchase requests. Management believes that the Bank has established and maintained the reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations at adequate levels, however, future adjustments to the reserve may be necessary due to economic, operating or other conditions beyond the Bank’s control. Investment Activities The investment policy of the Bank as established by the Board attempts to provide and maintain liquidity, generate a favorable return on investments without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk, and complement the Bank’s lending activities. Specifically, the Bank’s policies generally limit investments to government and Federal agency-backed securities, municipal securities and corporate debt obligations. The Bank’s policies provide that all investment purchases must be evaluated internally for creditworthiness and be approved by two officers (any two of the Senior Vice President/Treasurer, the Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, and the President/Chief Executive Officer). The Company’s investment policy mirrors that of the Bank except that it allows for the purchase of equity securities in limited amounts. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. If the Bank has the intent and the ability at the time of purchase to hold securities until maturity, they may be classified as held-to-maturity. Investment and mortgage-backed securities identified as held-to-maturity are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, which are recognized as adjustments to interest income. Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time, but not necessarily to maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset/ liability management strategy. Such securities are carried at estimated fair value and unrealized gains and losses, net of related tax effect, are excluded from earnings, but are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. See “Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.” 12 Mortgage-backed Securities. Mortgage-backed securities represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi- family mortgages, the principal and interest payments on which, in general, are passed from the mortgage originators, through intermediaries that pool and repackage the participation interests in the form of securities, to investors such as the Bank. Such intermediaries may be private issuers, or agencies including the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (“FHLMC”), the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”), and the Small Business Administration ("SBA") that guarantee the payment of principal and interest to investors. Mortgage-backed securities typically are issued with stated principal amounts, and the securities are backed by pools of mortgages that have loans with interest rates that are within a certain range and with varying maturities. The underlying pool of mortgages can be composed of either fixed- rate or ARM loans. The actual maturity of a mortgage-backed security varies, depending on when the mortgagors repay or prepay the underlying mortgages. Prepayments of the underlying mortgages may shorten the life of the security, thereby affecting its yield to maturity and the related estimated fair value of the mortgage-backed security. The prepayments of the underlying mortgages depend on many factors, including the type of mortgages, the coupon rates, the age of mortgages, the geographical location of the underlying real estate collateralizing the mortgages, the general levels of market interest rates, and general economic conditions. GNMA mortgage-backed securities that are backed by assumable Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) loans generally have a longer life than conventional non-assumable loans underlying FHLMC and FNMA mortgage- backed securities. During periods of falling mortgage interest rates, prepayments generally increase, as opposed to periods of increasing interest rates when prepayments generally decrease. If the interest rate of underlying mortgages significantly exceeds the prevailing market interest rates offered for mortgage loans, refinancing generally increases and accelerates the prepayment of the underlying mortgages. Prepayment experience is more difficult to estimate for adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. With the increase in interest rates at the end of 2016, prepayments have slowed as compared to recent years. The Bank has investments in mortgage-backed securities and has utilized such investments to complement its lending activities. The Bank invests in a large variety of mortgage-backed securities, including ARM, balloon and fixed-rate securities and all were directly insured or guaranteed by either FHLMC, FNMA, GNMA or SBA. The following table sets forth the Bank’s mortgage-backed securities activities at amortized cost for the periods indicated. Beginning balance Mortgage-backed securities acquired Mortgage-backed securities purchased Less: Principal repayments Less: Sales Amortization of premium Ending balance For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 (in thousands) 280,872 $ 326,117 $ 203,416 59,590 (73,470) (6,394) (1,131) — 16,913 (60,924) — (1,234) 462,883 $ 280,872 $ 2014 349,550 — 35,203 (57,199) — (1,437) 326,117 $ $ The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Bank’s mortgage- backed securities at the dates indicated. 2016 At December 31, 2015 2014 Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value (in thousands) $ 144,016 $ 141,754 $ 120,116 $ 118,991 $ 141,494 $ 217,445 92,475 8,947 217,096 92,230 8,975 160,254 162,170 184,003 502 — 597 — 620 — 140,444 187,495 739 — Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA GNMA SBA Total mortgage-backed securities $ 462,883 $ 460,055 $ 280,872 $ 281,758 $ 326,117 $ 328,678 Investment Securities. At December 31, 2016, the amortized cost of the Company’s investment securities totaled $157.5 million, and consisted of $32.5 million of U.S. agency obligations, $39.2 million of state and municipal obligations, $77.1 million of corporate debt securities, and $8.8 million of other investments. Each of the U.S. agency obligations are rated AA+ by Standard 13 and Poor’s and Aaa by Moody’s. The state and municipal obligations are issued by government entities with current credit ratings that are considered investment grade ranging from a high of AAA to a low of A+. The corporate debt securities include a $1.0 million issue of a local community bank purchased in late 2015 which is not rated by any of the credit rating services. Excluding this item, the remaining corporate debt securities are issued by various corporate entities with an amortized cost of $76.1 million. Credit ratings range from a high of AA- to a low of Ba1 as rated by one of the internationally-recognized credit rating services. See “Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements”. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities at the dates indicated. 2016 At December 31, 2015 2014 Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value (in thousands) Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations $ 32,502 $ 32,253 $ 85,084 $ 85,108 $ 106,294 $ 106,245 State and municipal obligations Corporate debt securities Other investments 39,155 77,057 8,778 38,309 71,141 8,550 13,311 56,000 — 13,326 47,473 — 13,829 55,000 — 13,846 45,250 — Total investment securities $ 157,492 $ 150,253 $ 154,395 $ 145,907 $ 175,123 $ 165,341 The table below sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost, weighted average yields and contractual maturities, excluding scheduled principal amortization, of the Bank’s investment and mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 2016. Other investments consist of mutual funds that do not have a contractual maturity date and are excluded from the table. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. See “Investment Activities – Mortgage-backed Securities”. At December 31, 2016 Total One Year or Less Amortized Cost More than One Year to Five Years Amortized Cost More than Five Years to Ten Years Amortized Cost More than Ten Years Amortized Cost Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value (dollars in thousands) Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations State and municipal obligations (1) Corporate debt securities (2) Total investment securities Weighted average yield Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA GNMA SBA Total mortgage-backed securities Weighted average yield $ $ $ $ $ 5,032 4,387 1,000 10,419 $ 1.35% $ $ 27,470 17,360 16,144 60,974 1.75% — $ 1,865 $ 8 — — 8 670 — — — $ — $ 17,408 2,971 20,379 $ 2.75% $ 26,685 49,013 151 — — 56,942 56,942 1.54% 115,466 167,754 92,324 8,947 $ $ $ 32,502 39,155 77,057 32,253 38,309 71,141 148,714 $ 141,703 1.78% $ 144,016 217,445 92,475 8,947 141,754 217,096 92,230 8,975 $ 2,535 $ 75,849 $ 384,491 $ 462,883 $ 460,055 4.49% 1.69% 2.65% 2.28% 2.14% (1) State and municipal obligations are reported at tax equivalent yield. (2) $60.9 million of the Bank’s corporate debt securities carry interest rates which adjust to a spread over LIBOR on a quarterly basis. Sources of Funds General. Deposits, repayments and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from sales of loans, investment maturities, cash flows generated from operations and FHLB advances and other borrowings are the primary sources of the Bank’s funds for use in lending, investing and for other general purposes. 14 Deposits. The Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms to retail, government and business customers. The Bank’s deposits consist of money market accounts, savings accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, non- interest-bearing accounts and time deposits. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market rates, prevailing interest rates and competition. The Bank’s deposits are obtained predominantly from the areas in which its branch offices are located. The Bank relies on its community-banking focus, stressing customer service and long-standing relationships with its customers to attract and retain these deposits; however, market interest rates and rates offered by competing financial institutions could significantly affect the Bank’s ability to attract and retain deposits. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $269.0 million in time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more maturing as follows: Maturity Period Three months or less Over three through six months Over six through 12 months Over 12 months Total Amount Weighted Average Rate (dollars in thousands) 52,447 43,077 55,562 117,864 268,950 1.02% 1.19 1.03 1.55 1.28% $ $ The following table sets forth the distribution of the Bank’s average deposit accounts and the average rate paid on those deposits for the periods indicated. For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 Percent of Total Average Deposits Average Balance Average Rate Paid Average Balance 2015 Percent of Total Average Deposits Average Rate Paid Average Balance 2014 Percent of Total Average Deposits Average Rate Paid (dollars in thousands) Money market deposit accounts $ 316,977 10.75% 0.27% $ 129,775 6.95% 0.14% $ 113,406 6.49% 0.08% Savings accounts Interest-bearing checking accounts Non-interest-bearing accounts Time deposits 447,484 15.17 1,266,135 497,166 422,026 42.92 16.85 14.31 0.04 0.17 — 1.03 306,151 16.39 875,326 327,216 229,785 46.85 17.51 12.30 0.03 0.11 — 1.33 295,289 16.89 869,383 257,058 213,566 49.71 14.70 12.21 0.04 0.11 — 1.39 Total average deposits $2,949,788 100.00% 0.25% $ 1,868,253 100.00% 0.23% $ 1,748,702 100.00% 0.24% Borrowings. The Bank has obtained advances from the FHLB for cash management and interest rate risk management purposes or as an alternative to deposit funds and may do so in the future as part of its operating strategy. FHLB term advances are also used to acquire certain other assets as may be deemed appropriate for investment purposes. Advances are collateralized primarily by certain of the Bank’s mortgage loans and investment and mortgage-backed securities and secondarily by the Bank’s investment in capital stock of the FHLB. The maximum amount that the FHLB will advance to member institutions, including the Bank, fluctuates from time to time in accordance with the policies of the FHLB. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $250.5 million in outstanding advances from the FHLB. The Bank also has outstanding municipal letters of credit issued by the FHLB used to secure government deposits. At December 31, 2016, these letters of credit totaled $456.0 million. The Bank also borrows funds using securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Under this form of borrowing specific U.S. Government agency and/or mortgage-backed securities are pledged as collateral to secure the borrowing. These pledged securities are held by a third-party custodian. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had borrowed $69.9 million through securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The Bank can also borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (“Reserve Bank”) under the primary credit program. Primary credit is available on a short-term basis, typically overnight, at a rate above the Federal Open Market Committee’s Federal funds target rate. All extensions of credit by the Reserve Bank must be secured. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had no borrowings outstanding with the Reserve Bank. 15 Subsidiary Activities At December 31, 2016, the Bank owned 9 direct subsidiaries: • OceanFirst REIT Holdings, Inc. was established in 2007 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank and now acts as the holding company for OceanFirst Management Corp, which was organized in 2016 for the purpose of holding and managing investment securities, including the stock of OceanFirst Realty Corp. OceanFirst Realty Corp. was established in 1997 and invests in qualifying mortgage loans and is intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust, which may, among other things, be utilized by the Company to raise capital in the future. • OCHB Preferred Corp. was acquired by the Bank part of its acquisition of Ocean Shore in 2016 and, like OceanFirst Realty Corp., is intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust. • OCHB Investment Corp. was acquired by the Bank as part of its acquisition of Ocean Shore in 2016 and serves to hold and manage investment securities. • 975 Holdings, LLC, Hooper Holdings, LLC, and TRREO Holdings, LLC were established in 2010, 2015, and 2016, respectively, as wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bank. Casaba Real Estate Holding Corporation and Cohensey Bridge, L.L.C. were acquired by the Bank as wholly-owned subsidiaries as part of its acquisition of Cape in 2016. All of these subsidiaries are maintained for the purpose of taking legal possession of certain repossessed collateral for resale to third parties. • OceanFirst Services, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank that is now the holding company for OFB Reinsurance, Ltd., which was established in 2002 to reinsure a percentage of the private mortgage insurance (“PMI”) risks on one-to-four family residential mortgages originated by the Bank. Personnel As of December 31, 2016, the Bank had 675 full-time employees and 122 part-time employees, for a total of 797 employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and the Bank considers its relationship with its employees to be good. From time to time the Bank may operate subsidiaries which may include employees not directly employed in banking activities. As of December 31, 2016, subsidiaries of the Bank had 81 full-time and 23 part-time employees to manage a repossessed commercial property. REGULATION AND SUPERVISION General As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is required by Federal law to file reports with, and comply with the rules and regulations of the FRB. As a Federally-chartered savings bank, the Bank is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the OCC, as its primary Federal regulator, and the FDIC, as the deposit insurer. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and, with respect to deposit insurance, of the Deposit Insurance Fund managed by the FDIC. The Bank must file reports with the OCC and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to consummating certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other insured depository institutions. The OCC conducts periodic examinations to test the Bank’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors and to ensure the safe and sound operation of the Bank. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. The description of statutory provisions and regulations applicable to savings institutions and their holding companies set forth in this Form 10-K does not purport to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on the Bank and the Company, is subject to change and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual laws and regulations involved. The Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changed the bank regulatory structure and affects the lending, deposit, investment, compliance and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various Federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The Federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act are still not yet known. In addition, as a result of the 2016 election, there is some chance that certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act may be repealed or amended. 16 The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Savings institutions such as the Bank with $10 billion or less in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators (the OCC in the case of the Bank), although the CFPB will have back-up authority over such institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the Federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and Federal savings associations, and gives state attorney generals the ability to enforce Federal consumer protection laws. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act includes a series of provisions covering mortgage loan origination standards affecting, among other things, originator compensation, minimum repayment standards and prepayments. The Dodd-Frank Act requires originators to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on documented information that a borrower has a reasonable ability to repay a particular mortgage loan over the long term. If the originator cannot meet this standard, the burden is on the lender to demonstrate the appropriateness of its policies and the strength of its controls. The Dodd-Frank Act contains an exception from this Ability-To-Repay rule for “Qualified Mortgages.” The rule sets forth specific underwriting criteria for a loan to qualify as a Qualified Mortgage. The criteria generally exclude loans that (1) are interest-only, (2) have excessive upfront points or fees, or (3) have negative amortization features, balloon payments, or terms in excess of 30 years. To be defined as an Ability-To-Repay Qualified Mortgage, the underwriting criteria also impose a maximum debt to income ratio of 43%, based upon documented and verifiable information. If a loan meets these criteria and is not a “higher priced loan” as defined in FRB regulations, the CFPB rule establishes a safe harbor preventing a consumer from asserting the failure of the originator to establish the consumer’s Ability- To-Repay. Additionally, conforming fixed-rate loans with a debt-to-income ratio greater than 43% would also qualify as an Ability- To-Repay Qualified Mortgage based upon an automated loan approval from one of the government sponsored mortgage entities. However, a consumer may assert the lender’s failure to comply with the Ability-To-Repay rule for all residential mortgage loans other than Qualified Mortgages, and may challenge a lender's determination that a loan was in fact a Qualified Mortgage. The qualified mortgage rule has yet to be fully addressed by the foreclosure courts and depending on the interpretation of these rules, collectability of non-qualifying mortgages could be subject to future action by the courts. See "Risk Factors – The Dodd-Frank Act imposes obligations on originators of residential mortgage loans, such as the Bank." The Dodd-Frank Act also directed the FRB to issue rules to limit debit card interchange fees (the fees that issuing banks charge merchants each time a consumer uses a debit card) collected by banks with assets of $10 billion or more. The FRB issued a final rule which caps an issuer’s debit card interchange base fee at twenty-one cents ($0.21) per transaction and allows an additional 5 basis point charge per transaction to cover fraud losses. The FRB also issued an interim final rule that allows a fraud-prevention adjustment of one cent ($0.01) per transaction conditioned upon an issuer adopting effective fraud prevention policies and procedures. The Bank’s average interchange fee per transaction is 39 cents ($0.39). The Dodd-Frank Act exempts from the FRB’s rule banks with assets less than $10 billion, such as the Bank. Although exempt from the rule, market forces in future periods may result in reduced fees charged by all issuers, regardless of asset size, which may result in reduced revenues for the Bank. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bank’s revenues from interchange fees was $4.3 million, an increase of $1.2 million from 2015. The Dodd-Frank Act requires publicly-traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and allow greater access by stockholders to the company’s proxy material by authorizing the SEC to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal banking agencies to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded. The rules prohibit incentive-based compensation that would encourage inappropriate risks by providing excessive compensation or that would expose the bank to inappropriate risks by providing compensation that could lead to a material financial loss. It is still uncertain to what extent and how full implementation of and promulgation of rules under the Dodd-Frank Act, will occur and affect the Bank. Holding Company Regulation The Company is a nondiversified unitary savings and loan holding company within the meaning of Federal law. Generally, a unitary savings and loan holding company, such as the Company, is not restricted as to the types of business activities in which it may engage, provided that the Bank continues to be a qualified thrift lender (“QTL”). See “Federal Savings Institution Regulation —QTL Test.” The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 provides that no company may acquire control of a savings association unless it engages only in the financial activities permitted for financial holding companies or for multiple savings and loan holding companies as described below. Further, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act specifies that existing savings and loan holding companies may only engage in such activities. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, however, grandfathered the unrestricted authority for activities with respect to unitary savings and loan holding companies existing prior to May 4, 1999, such as the Company, so long as the 17 Bank continues to comply with the QTL test. The Company qualifies for the grandfather provision. Upon any non-supervisory acquisition by the Company of another savings institution or savings bank that meets the QTL test and is deemed to be a savings institution, the Company would become a multiple savings and loan holding company (if the acquired institution is held as a separate subsidiary) and would generally be limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act. A savings and loan holding company is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings institution or savings and loan holding company without prior written approval of the FRB and from acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the FRB considers the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the deposit insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors. Holding Company Capital Requirements. Until recently, savings and loan holding companies were not subject to specific regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, required the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to depository institutions themselves. The Dodd-Frank Act final rule applied consolidated regulatory capital requirements to savings and loan holding companies as of January 1, 2015. As is the case with depository institutions themselves, a capital conservation buffer will be phased in between 2016 and 2019. The Dodd-Frank Act also extended the “source of strength” doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board has issued regulations requiring that all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress. Dividends. The FRB has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends and the repurchase of shares of common stock by bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior regulatory review of capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the Company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the Company’s overall rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the Company’s capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. The policy statement also states that a holding company should inform the FRB supervisory staff prior to redeeming or repurchasing common stock or perpetual preferred stock if the holding company is experiencing financial weaknesses or if the repurchase or redemption would result in a net reduction, as of the end of the quarter, in the amount of such instruments outstanding compared with the beginning of the quarter in which the redemption or repurchase occurred. These regulatory policies may affect the ability of the Company to pay dividends, repurchase shares of common stock or otherwise engage in capital distributions. Acquisition of the Company. Under the Federal Change in Bank Control Act (“CBCA”) and applicable regulations, a notice must be submitted to the FRB if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding voting stock, unless the FRB has found that the acquisition will not result in a change of control of the Company. Under CBCA, the FRB has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that so acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company. Federal Savings Institution Regulation Business Activities. The activities of Federal savings institutions are governed by Federal law and regulations. These laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which Federal savings banks may engage. In particular, many types of lending authority for Federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, are limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets. Capital Requirements. FDIC regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of capital including: a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets of 8%, and a 4% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio. These capital requirements were effective January 1, 2015 and are the result of a final rule implementing regulatory amendments based on recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. As noted, the risk-based capital standards for banks require the maintenance of common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests) are 18 multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities are included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital unless a one-time opt-out is exercised. The Bank has exercised the opt- out. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations. In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, but qualitative factors as well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual banks where necessary. In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in over four years beginning January 1, 2016. The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in incrementally, starting at 0.625% on January 1, 2016, and increasing to 1.25% on January 1, 2017, 1.875% on January 1, 2018, and 2.50% on January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective. Both the Bank and the Company are in compliance with the capital conservation buffer requirements applicable to them. The Federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have also adopted regulations to require an assessment of an institution’s exposure to declines in the economic value of a bank’s capital due to changes in interest rates when assessing the bank’s capital adequacy. Under such a risk assessment, examiners evaluate a bank’s capital for interest rate risk on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Institutions with significant interest rate risk may be required to hold additional capital. According to the Federal banking agencies, applicable considerations include: quality of the bank’s interest rate risk management process; the overall financial condition of the bank; and the level of other risks at the bank for which capital is needed. The following table presents the Bank’s capital position at December 31, 2016. The Bank exceeded all of its capital requirements at that date. As of December 31, 2016 Bank: Tier 1 capital (to average assets) Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets) Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) Actual Capital Required Capital Excess Amount Actual Percent Required Percent Capital (dollars in thousands) $ 445,576 $ 176,856 445,576 445,576 461,386 180,178 232,913 303,227 $ $ $ $ 268,720 265,398 212,663 158,159 10.08% (2) 4.000% 12.67 12.67 13.12 5.125 6.625 8.625 (1) (1) (1) (1) Includes the Capital Conservation Buffer of 0.625% (2) Tier 1 capital ratios are calculated based on outstanding capital at the end of the quarter divided by average assets for the quarter. The average assets for the fourth quarter exclude the assets acquired from Ocean Shore for the period from October 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016. The Tier 1 capital ratio for the Bank based on total assets as of the end of the period is 8.75%. Prompt Corrective Action. Federal law requires, among other things, that the Federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. The FDIC’s regulations define the five categories as follows: An institution is classified as “well capitalized” if: • • • • its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is at least 5%, and it is not subject to any order or directive by the FDIC to meet a specific capital level; and its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 6.5%; and its ratio to Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8%; and its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 10%. 19 An institution is classified as “adequately capitalized” if: • • • • its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is at least 4%; and its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 4.5%; and its ratio to Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 6%; and its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8%. An institution is classified as “undercapitalized” if: • • • • its leverage ratio is less than 4%; and its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is less than 4.5%; and its ratio to Tier 1 risk based capital is at less than 6%; and its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8%. An institution is classified as “significantly undercapitalized” if: • • • • its leverage ratio is less than 3%; or its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is less than 3.0%; or its ratio to Tier 1 risk based capital is at less than 4%; or its total risk-based capital is less than 6%. An institution that has a tangible capital to total assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.” The FDIC is required, with some exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured bank if that bank is “critically undercapitalized.” The FDIC may also appoint a conservator or receiver for a state bank on the basis of the institution’s financial condition or upon the occurrence of certain events, including: • • • • • insolvency, or when the assets of the bank are less than its liabilities to depositors and others; substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; likelihood that the bank will be unable to meet the demands of its depositors or to pay its obligations in the normal course of business; and insufficient capital, or the incurring or likely incurring of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment of capital without Federal assistance. Based on the regulatory guidelines, the Bank meets the requirements to be classified as “well-capitalized.” Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Deposit accounts at the Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC. The Bank is therefore subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments which are determined using a risk-based system. In 2011 the FDIC approved a final rule, required by Dodd-Frank, that changed the assessment base from domestic deposits to average assets minus average tangible equity, adopted a new large-bank pricing assessment scheme, and set a target size for the DIF. The rule finalized a target size for the DIF at 2% of insured deposits. It also implemented a lower assessment rate schedule when the fund reaches 1.15% (so that the average rate over time should be about 8.5 basis points) and, in lieu of dividends, provided for a lower rate schedule when the reserve ratio reaches 2% and 2.5%. The rule lowered overall assessment rates in order to generate the same approximate amount of revenue under the new larger base as was raised under the old base. The assessment rates in total are between 2.5 and 9 basis points on the broader base for banks in the lowest risk category, and 30 to 45 basis points for banks in the highest risk category. Deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC generally up to a maximum of $250,000 per separately insured depositor. The FDIC may terminate the insurance of an institution’s deposits upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. The management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance. In addition to the FDIC assessments, the Financing Corporation, formed in the 1980s to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, is authorized to impose and collect, through the FDIC, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation. The bonds issued by the Financing Corporation are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. The total expense incurred in 2016 and 2015 for the deposit insurance assessment and the Financing Corporation payments was $2.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. 20 Loans to One Borrower. Federal law provides that savings institutions are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Subject to certain exceptions, a savings institution may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral. At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s limit on loans to one borrower was $66.8 million and the largest loan exposure to a single borrower was $22.3 million. Qualified Thrift Lender Test. The Home Owners Loan Act requires savings institutions to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test, a savings institution is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (1) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (2) intangibles, including goodwill; and (3) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months out of each 12 month period. Additionally, education loans, credit card loans and small business loans may be considered “qualified thrift investments.” A savings institution that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to certain operating restrictions and may be required to convert to a bank charter. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank met the qualified thrift lender test with a ratio of qualified thrift investments to portfolio assets of 70.6%. See “Risk Factors. The Bank is required to maintain a significant percentage of total assets in residential mortgage loans and investments secured by residential mortgage loans, which restricts the ability to diversify the loan portfolio.” Limitation on Capital Distributions. Applicable regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a savings institution, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the approval of the OCC, is required prior to any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under the regulations (i.e., generally, examination ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the OCC. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to the FRB of the capital distribution if, like the Bank, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. In the event the Bank’s capital fell below its regulatory requirements or the FRB or OCC notified it that it was in need of more than normal supervision, the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the FRB or OCC could prohibit a proposed capital distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the FRB or OCC determine that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. If the FRB or OCC objects to the Bank’s notice to pay a dividend to the Company, the Company may not have the liquidity necessary to pay a dividend in the future, pay a dividend at the same rate as historically paid, be able to repurchase stock, or to meet current debt obligations. In addition, capital requirements made applicable to the Company as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III may limit the Company’s ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock in the future. Assessments. Savings institutions are required to pay assessments to fund regulatory operations. The assessments, paid on a semi- annual basis, are based upon the institution’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries as reported in the Bank’s latest quarterly regulatory report, as well as the institution’s regulatory rating and complexity component. The assessments paid by the Bank for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 totaled $623,000 and $477,000, respectively. Transactions with Related Parties. The Bank’s authority to engage in transactions with “affiliates” (e.g., any company that controls or is under common control with an institution, including the Company and its non-savings institution subsidiaries) is limited by Federal law. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings institution. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings institution’s capital and surplus. Certain transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in Federal law. The purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. The transactions with affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances, that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary. Federal Home Loan Bank System The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional FHLBs. Each FHLB provides member institutions with a central credit facility. The Bank, as a member of the FHLB-NY is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that FHLB in an amount at least equal to 0.20% of mortgage-related assets and 4.5% of the specified value of certain transactions with the FHLB. The Bank was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in FHLB-NY stock at December 31, 2016 of $19.3 million. 21 Federal Reserve System The Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository institutions to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily interest-bearing checking and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $110.2 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $110.2 million. The first $15.2 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the FRB) are exempt from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually. The Bank complies with the foregoing requirements. For 2017, the FRB has set the 3% reserve limit at $115.1 million and the exemption at $15.5 million. FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION Federal Taxation General. The Company and the Bank report their income on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting, and are subject to Federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly the Bank’s reserve for bad debts. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the Bank or the Company. The Bank has not been audited by the IRS in over 10 years. For its 2016 taxable year, the Bank is subject to a maximum Federal income tax rate of 35%. Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) imposes a tax on alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) at a rate of 20%. Only 90% of AMTI can be offset by net operating loss carryovers. AMTI is increased by an amount equal to 75% of the amount by which the Bank’s adjusted current earnings exceeds its AMTI (determined without regard to this preference and prior to reduction for net operating losses). The Bank does not expect to be subject to the AMTI. Dividends Received Deduction and Other Matters. The Company may exclude from its income 100% of dividends received from the Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations. The corporate dividends received deduction is generally 70% in the case of dividends received from unaffiliated corporations with which the Company and the Bank will not file a consolidated tax return, except that if the Company or the Bank own more than 20% of the stock of a corporation distributing a dividend then 80% of any dividends received may be deducted. State and Local Taxation New Jersey Taxation. The Bank files New Jersey income tax returns. For New Jersey income tax purposes, the Bank is subject to a tax rate of 9% of taxable income. For this purpose, “taxable income” generally means Federal taxable income, subject to certain adjustments (including addition of interest income on state and municipal obligations). The Company is required to file a New Jersey income tax return because it does business in New Jersey. For New Jersey tax purposes, regular corporations are presently taxed at a rate equal to 9% of taxable income. However, if the Company meets certain requirements, it may be eligible to elect to be taxed as a New Jersey Investment Company at a tax rate presently equal to 3.60% (40% of 9%) of taxable income. OceanFirst REIT Holdings, Inc. files a New Jersey income tax return and qualifies as a New Jersey Investment Company which is taxed at a rate presently equal to 3.60% of taxable income. New York Taxation. Due to an increase in loan activity both organically and through acquisition, the Bank is required to file a New York State and MTA tax return. The New York return requires consolidation of all entities, including OceanFirst Realty, and New York taxable income, consistent with other states, generally means Federal taxable income subject to certain adjustments. The allocation and apportionment of taxable income to New York state may positively effect the overall tax rate. Delaware Taxation. As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, the Company is exempted from Delaware corporate income tax but is required to file an annual report with and pay an annual franchise tax to the State of Delaware. Item 1A. Risk Factors An investment in the Company's common stock involves risks. Stockholders should carefully consider the risks described below, together with other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making any purchase or sale decisions regarding the Company's common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company's financial condition or operating results may be harmed. In that case, the trading price of the Company's common stock may decline, and stockholders may lose part or all of their investment in the Company's common stock. 22 A downturn in the local economy or in local real estate values could adversely impact profits. Most of the Bank’s loans are secured by real estate and are made to borrowers in Central and Southern New Jersey and the surrounding areas. A downturn in the local economy or a decline in real estate values could increase the amount of non-performing loans and cause residential and commercial mortgage loans to become inadequately collateralized, which could expose the Bank to a greater risk of loss. Hurricanes and other natural disasters, climate change or increases to flood insurance premiums could adversely affect asset quality and earnings. The Bank’s trade area includes counties in New Jersey with extensive coastal regions. These areas may be vulnerable to flooding or other damage from future storms or hurricanes. This damage may be as bad as, or worse than, that suffered during Superstorm Sandy in 2012. Further storms like this, although rare, could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations by disrupting operations, adversely impacting the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay their loans, damaging collateral or reducing the value of real estate used as collateral. Increased emphasis on commercial lending may expose the Bank to increased lending risks. At December 31, 2016, $1.8 billion, or 47.6%, of the Bank’s total loans consisted of commercial real estate, multi-family and land loans, and commercial and industrial loans. This portfolio has grown in recent years and the Bank intends to continue to emphasize these types of lending. These types of loans may expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the borrowers. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The long foreclosure timeline in New Jersey continues to adversely impact the Bank’s recoveries on non-performing loans. The Judicial foreclosure process in New Jersey is protracted, which delays the Company’s ability to resolve non-performing loans through the sale of the underlying collateral. The longer timelines were the result of the economic crisis, additional consumer protection initiatives related to the foreclosure process, increased documentary requirements and judicial scrutiny, and, both voluntary and mandatory programs under which lenders may consider loan modifications or other alternatives to foreclosure. These reasons, historical issues at the largest mortgage loan servicers, and the legal and regulatory responses have impacted the foreclosure process and completion time of foreclosures for residential mortgage lenders, which may result in a material adverse effect on collateral values and the Bank’s ability to minimize its losses. The Company has grown and may continue to grow through acquisitions. To be successful as a larger institution, the Company must successfully integrate the operations and retain the customers of acquired institutions, attract and retain the management required to successfully manage larger operations, and control costs. Since July 31, 2015, the Company has acquired Colonial, Cape and Ocean Shore. Future results of operations will depend in large part on the Company’s ability to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired institutions and retain the customers of those institutions. If the Company is unable to successfully manage the integration of the separate cultures, customer bases and operating systems of the acquired institutions, and any other institutions that may be acquired in the future, the Company’s results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, to successfully manage substantial growth, the Company may need to increase non-interest expenses through additional personnel, leasehold and data processing costs, among others. In order to successfully manage growth, the Company may need to adopt and effectively implement policies, procedures and controls to maintain credit quality, control costs and oversee the Company’s operations. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in this strategy. The Company may be challenged to successfully manage its business as a result of the strain on management and operations that may result from growth. The ability to manage growth will depend on its ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled employees. Success will also depend on the ability of officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships and to hire, train and manage employees. Finally, substantial growth may stress regulatory capital levels, and may require the Company to raise additional capital. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to raise any required capital, or that it will be able to raise capital on terms that are beneficial to stockholders. Future acquisition activity could dilute tangible book value. Both nationally and locally, the banking industry is undergoing consolidation marked by numerous mergers and acquisitions. From time to time the Company may be presented with opportunities to acquire institutions and/or bank branches which result in discussions and negotiations. Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and trading values, and therefore, may result in the dilution of tangible book value per share. The Dodd-Frank Act imposes obligations on originators of residential mortgage loans, such as the Bank. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act requires originators to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on documented information that a borrower has a reasonable ability to repay a particular mortgage loan over the long term. If the originator cannot meet this standard, 23 the burden is on the lender to demonstrate the appropriateness of its policies and the strength of its controls. The Dodd-Frank Act contains an exception from this Ability-To-Repay rule for “Qualified Mortgages.” The rule sets forth specific underwriting criteria for a loan to qualify as a Qualified Mortgage. If a loan meets these criteria and is not a “higher priced loan” as defined in FRB regulations, the CFPB rule establishes a safe harbor preventing a consumer from asserting the failure of the originator to establish the consumer’s Ability-To-Repay. Additionally, conforming fixed-rate loans with a debt-to-income ratio greater than 43% would also qualify as an Ability-To-Repay Qualified Mortgage based upon an automated loan approval from one of the government sponsored mortgage entities. However, a consumer may assert the lender’s failure to comply with the Ability-To-Repay rule for all residential mortgage loans other than Qualified Mortgages, and may challenge whether a loan actually met the criteria to be deemed an Ability-to-Pay Qualified Mortgage. These challenges have yet to be addressed by the courts. Although the majority of residential mortgages historically originated by the Bank would be considered Qualified Mortgages, the Bank currently originates residential mortgage loans that do not qualify. As a result of the Ability-to-Repay rules, the Bank may experience loan losses, litigation related expenses and delays in taking title to real estate collateral in a foreclosure proceeding if these loans do not perform and borrowers challenge whether the Bank satisfied the Ability-To-Repay rule upon originating the loan. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses may be inadequate, which could hurt the Company’s earnings. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses may prove to be inadequate to cover actual loan losses and if the Bank is required to increase its allowance, current earnings may be reduced. The Bank provides for losses by reserving what it believes to be an adequate amount to absorb any probable incurred losses. A “charge-off” reduces the Bank’s reserve for possible loan losses. If the Bank’s reserves were insufficient, it would be required to record a larger reserve, which would reduce earnings for that period. Changes in interest rates could adversely affect results of operations and financial condition. The Bank’s ability to make a profit largely depends on net interest income, which could be negatively affected by changes in interest rates. The interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities are generally fixed for a contractual period of time. Interest-bearing liabilities generally have shorter contractual maturities than interest-earning assets. This imbalance can create significant earnings volatility, because market interest rates change over time. In a period of rising interest rates, the interest income earned on interest-earning assets may not increase as rapidly as the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average life of loans and mortgage-backed securities. A reduction in interest rates causes increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities as borrowers refinance their debt to reduce their borrowing costs. This creates reinvestment risk, which is the risk that the Bank may not be able to reinvest the funds from faster prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates earned on the prepaid loans or mortgage-backed securities. Conversely, an increase in interest rates generally reduces prepayments. Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and/ or make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable-rate loans. Changes in interest rates also affect the current estimated fair value of the interest-earning securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized net losses on securities available-for-sale are reported as a separate component of equity. To the extent interest rates increase and the value of the available-for-sale portfolio decreases, stockholders’ equity will be adversely affected. Changes in the estimated fair value of securities may reduce stockholders’ equity and net income. At December 31, 2016, the Company maintained a securities portfolio of $610.9 million, of which $12.2 million was classified as available-for-sale. The estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities portfolio may increase or decrease depending on the credit quality of the underlying issuer, market liquidity, changes in interest rates and other factors. Stockholders’ equity is increased or decreased by the amount of the change in the unrealized gain or loss (difference between the estimated fair value and the amortized cost) of the available-for-sale securities portfolio, net of the related tax expense or benefit, under the category of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Therefore, a decline in the estimated fair value of this portfolio will result in a decline in reported stockholders’ equity, as well as book value per common share. The decrease will occur even though the securities are not sold. The Company conducts a periodic review and evaluation of the complete securities portfolio to determine if the decline in the estimated fair value of any security below its cost basis is other-than-temporary. Factors which are considered in the analysis include, but are not limited to, the severity and duration of the decline in estimated fair value of the security, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, whether the decline appears to be related to issuer conditions or general market or industry conditions, the intent and ability to retain the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value and the likelihood of any near-term fair value recovery. If such decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the security is written down to a new cost basis and the resulting loss is charged to earnings as a component of non-interest income. At December 31, 2016 the securities portfolio included corporate debt securities issued by national and regional banks in an unrealized loss position for greater than one year. The portfolio consisted of ten $5.0 million issues and two $2.5 million issues spread among eight issuers. At December 31, 2016, the securities in a loss position had a book value of $55.0 million and an 24 estimated fair value of $49.1 million. At December 31, 2016, the Company determined that no other-than-temporary charge was required. However, the Company may be required to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment charge related to these securities if circumstances change. The Bank may be required to repurchase mortgage loans for a breach of representations and warranties, which could harm the Company’s earnings. The Company has entered into loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of business. The loan sale agreements generally require the repurchase of certain loans previously sold in the event of a violation of various representations and warranties customary to the mortgage banking industry. FNMA, FHLMC and investors carefully examine loan documentation on delinquent loans for a possible reason to request a repurchase by the loan originator. A subsequent sale of the repurchased mortgage loan or underlying collateral could typically be at a significant discount to the unpaid principal balance. The Company maintains a reserve for repurchased loans, however, if repurchase activity is greater than anticipated, the reserve may need to be increased to cover actual losses which could harm future earnings. The Company and the Bank operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations. The Company is subject to examination and regulation by the FRB. The Bank is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the OCC, its primary Federal regulator, and by the FDIC, as insurer of deposits. Such regulation and supervision governs the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on operations, the classification of assets and determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses. The laws and regulations that govern the Company and the Bank’s operations are designed for the protection of depositors and the public, but not the Company’s stockholders. In July of 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted. The Dodd-Frank Act is a broad legislative initiative that is significantly changing the bank regulatory structure and affecting the operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Dodd-Frank Act also directed the FRB to issue rules to limit debit-card interchange fees, (the fees that issuing banks charge merchants each time a consumer uses a debit card) collected by banks with assets of $10 billion or more. Although the Bank is exempt from this rule, market forces in future periods, may result in reduced fees charged by all issuers, regardless of asset size, which may result in reduced revenues for the Bank. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bank’s revenues from interchange fees were $4.3 million, an increase of $1.2 million from 2015. See “Regulation and Supervision, General, The Dodd-Frank Act.” In July 2013 the FDIC and the other Federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. See “Regulation and Supervision, General, The Dodd-Frank Act”. The USA Patriot and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit activities. If such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions. Although the Bank has developed policies and procedures designated to comply with these laws and regulations, these policies and procedures may not be totally effective in preventing violations of these laws and regulations. These provisions, as well as any other aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry, may impact the profitability of the Company’s business activities and may change certain business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose the Company to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These changes also may require the Company to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations in order to comply, and could therefore also materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. There is no guaranty that the Company will be able to continue to pay a dividend or, if continued, will be able to pay a dividend at the current rate. The Board of Directors of the Company determines at its discretion if, when and the amount of dividends that may be paid on the common stock. In making such determination under the Company’s capital management plan, the Board of Directors takes into account various factors including economic conditions, earnings, liquidity needs, the financial condition of the Company, applicable state law, regulatory requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Although the Company has a history of paying a quarterly dividend on its common stock, there is no guaranty that such dividends will continue to be paid in the future or at what rate. 25 Competition from other banks, financial institutions, government-sponsored entities and emerging technological providers in originating loans, attracting deposits and providing various financial services may adversely affect profitability and liquidity. The Company has substantial competition in originating loans, both commercial and consumer, in its market area. This competition comes principally from other banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies and other lenders. Many of these competitors enjoy advantages, including greater financial resources and access to capital, stronger regulatory ratios and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. In addition, rapid technological changes and consumer preferences may result in increased competition for the Bank’ services. Increased competition could reduce the Company’s net income by decreasing the number and size of loans that the Bank originates and the interest rates charged on these loans, or reducing the Bank’s ability to attract deposits. In attracting consumer, business and public fund deposits, the Company faces substantial competition from other insured depository institutions such as banks, savings institutions and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds. Many of its competitors enjoy advantages, including greater financial resources and access to capital, stronger regulatory ratios, stronger asset quality and performance, more aggressive marketing campaigns, better brand recognition and more branch locations. These competitors may offer higher interest rates than the Company, which could decrease the deposits that the Company attracts or require the Company to increase its rates to retain existing deposits or attract new deposits. Increased deposit competition could adversely affect the Company’s ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations. As a result, the Company may need to seek other sources of funds that may be more expensive to obtain which could increase the cost of funds. Public fund deposits from local government entities such as counties, townships, school districts and other municipalities generally have higher average balances and the Bank’s inability to retain such funds could adversely affect liquidity or result in the use of higher-cost funding sources. Over the past few years, the FRB has been a consistently large purchaser of U.S. Treasury and GSE-backed mortgage-backed securities. The Bank has also faced increased competition for mortgage loans due to the unprecedented involvement of the GSEs in the mortgage market as a result of the economic crisis. The actions of the FRB and the GSEs have caused the interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgage loans that conform to GSE guidelines to remain artificially low. As a result of these factors, it may be difficult for the Bank to originate mortgage loans and grow the residential mortgage loan portfolio, which could have a materially adverse impact on the Bank’s earnings. The Company’s inability to tailor its retail delivery model to respond to consumer preferences in banking may negatively affect earnings. The Bank has expanded its market presence through de novo branching and acquisitions . The branch continues to be a very significant source of new business generation, however, consumers continue to migrate much of their routine banking to self- service channels. In recognition of this shift in consumer patterns, the Bank has undertaken a comprehensive review of its branch network, resulting in branch consolidation accompanied by the enhancement of the Bank’s capabilities to serve its customers through channels other than branches. The benefits of this strategy are dependent on the Bank's ability to realize expected expense reductions without experiencing significant customer attrition. The Company must continue to attract and retain qualified personnel and maintain cost controls and asset quality. The Company’s ability to manage growth successfully will depend on its ability to continue to attract and retain management and loan officers experienced in banking and financial services and familiar with the communities in its market area. The unexpected loss of service of any key management personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could adversely affect the Company. If the Company grows too quickly and is not able to attract qualified personnel and maintain cost controls and asset quality, this continued growth could adversely affect the Company. Risks associated with system failures, interruptions, or breaches of security could disrupt businesses, result in the disclosure of confidential information, damage the reputation of, and create significant financial and legal exposure for the Company. Information technology systems are critical to the Company’s business. Various systems are used to manage customer relationships, including deposits and loans, general ledger and securities investments. Although the Company devotes significant resources to maintain and regularly upgrade its systems and processes that are designed to protect the security of the Company’s computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets and the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information belonging to the Company and its customers, there is no assurance that all of the Company’s security measures will provide absolute security. This risk is evidenced by recent events where financial institutions and companies engaged in data processing have reported breaches in the security of their websites or other systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage, often through the introduction of computer viruses or malware, cyberattacks, ransomware and other means. Additionally, there is the risk of distributed denial-of-service attacks from technically sophisticated and well-resourced third parties which are intended to disrupt online services, as well as data breaches due to cyberattacks which result in unauthorized access to customer data. Despite the Company’s efforts to ensure the integrity of its 26 systems, it is possible that the Company may not be able to anticipate or to implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until launched, and because cyberattacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including third parties outside the Company such as persons who are involved with organized crime or associated with external service providers or who may be linked to terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments. Those parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers or other users of the Company’s systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to the Company’s data or that of its customers or clients. These risks may increase in the future as the Company continues to increase its mobile and other internet-based product offerings. In addition, a majority of data processing is outsourced to certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if there is difficulty communicating with them, the ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and business operations could be adversely affected. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various vendors and their personnel. The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach of security of the Company’s or its vendors’ systems could cause serious negative consequences for the Company, including significant disruption of the Company’s operations, misappropriation of confidential information of the Company or that of its customers, or damage to computers or systems of the Company and those of its customers and counterparties, and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to the Company or to its customers, loss of confidence in the Company’s security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure, and harm to the Company’s reputation, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company may incur impairments to goodwill. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had $145.1 million in goodwill which is evaluated for impairment, at least annually. Significant negative industry or economic trends, including declines in the market price the Company’s stock, reduced estimates of future cash flows or business disruptions could result in impairments to goodwill. The valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and to rely on projections of future operating performance. The Company operates in competitive environments and projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. If the analysis results in impairment to goodwill, an impairment charge to earnings would be recorded in the financial statements during the period in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such charge could have an adverse effect on the results of operations. The Bank is required to maintain a significant percentage of total assets in residential mortgage loans and investments secured by residential mortgage loans, which restricts the ability to diversify the loan portfolio. A Federal savings bank differs from a commercial bank in that it is required to maintain at least 65% of its total assets in “qualified thrift investments” which generally include loans and investments for the purchase, refinance, construction, improvement, or repair of residential real estate, as well as home equity loans, education loans and small business loans. To maintain the Federal savings bank charter the Bank has to be a “qualified thrift lender” or “QTL” in nine out of each 12 immediately preceding months. The QTL requirement limits the extent to which the Bank can grow the commercial loan portfolio. However, a loan that does not exceed $2 million (including a group of loans to one borrower) that is for commercial, corporate, business, or agricultural purposes is included in the qualified thrift investments. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank maintained 70.6% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments. Because of the QTL requirement, the Bank may be limited in its ability to change its asset mix and increase the yield on earning assets by growing the commercial loan portfolio. Alternatively, the Bank may find it necessary to pursue different structures, including converting from a savings bank charter to a commercial bank charter. The value of the Company’s deferred tax asset could be reduced if corporate tax rates in the U.S. are decreased. There have been recent discussions in Congress and by the executive branch regarding potentially decreasing the U.S. corporate tax rate. While the Company may benefit in some respects from any decreases in these corporate tax rates, any reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate would result in a decrease to the value of the net deferred tax asset, which could negatively affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None Item 2. Properties The Bank conducts its business through its administrative office, which includes a branch office, 60 additional branch offices and 2 deposit production facilities. The branch offices are located throughout Central and Southern New Jersey. The Bank also operates a wealth management office in Ocean County, and commercial loan production offices in the Philadelphia area and Mercer County, New Jersey. 27 Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company and the Bank are not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such other routine legal proceedings in the aggregate are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not Applicable. 28 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information for Common Stock OceanFirst Financial Corp.’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol OCFC. The table below shows the reported high and low daily closing prices of the common stock during the periods indicated in 2016 and 2015. 2016 High Low 2015 High Low First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $ $ 19.95 16.30 First Quarter 17.42 16.11 $ $ 19.48 16.96 Second Quarter 18.76 16.75 $ $ 19.95 18.12 Third Quarter 19.04 16.59 $ $ 30.07 19.05 Fourth Quarter 20.94 17.22 As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately 4,100 stockholders, including the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee or street name through various brokers and banks. Stock Performance Graph The following graph shows a comparison of total stockholder return on OceanFirst Financial Corp.‘s common stock, based on the market price of the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total return of companies in the Nasdaq Composite Index and the SNL Thrift Index for the period December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2016. The graph may not be indicative of possible future performance of the Company’s common stock. Cumulative return assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is expressed in dollars based on an initial investment of $100. Index OceanFirst Financial Corp. Nasdaq Composite SNL Thrift 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 12/31/14 12/31/15 12/31/16 Period Ending 100.00 100.00 100.00 108.90 117.45 121.63 29 139.85 164.57 156.09 144.11 188.84 167.88 173.49 201.98 188.78 267.66 219.89 231.23 For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid an annual cash dividend of $0.54 and $0.52 per share, respectively. On July 24, 2014, the Company announced authorization by the Board of Directors to repurchase up to 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or 867,923 shares. Information regarding the Company’s common stock repurchases for the three month period ended December 31, 2016 is as follows: Period October 1, 2016 through October 31, 2016 November 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016 December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs — 90,000 — 244,804 154,804 154,804 Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share — — $ 90,000 — 20.86 — 30 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The selected consolidated financial and other data of the Company set forth below is derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto presented elsewhere in this Annual Report. Selected Financial Condition Data: Total assets Securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value Securities held-to-maturity, net Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Loans receivable, net Deposits Federal Home Loan Bank advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings Stockholders’ equity Selected Operating Data: Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Other income Operating expenses Merger related expenses Federal Home Loan Bank advance prepayment fee Branch consolidation expense Income before provision for income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 (dollars in thousands) At December 31, $ 5,167,052 $ 2,593,068 $ 2,356,714 $ 2,249,711 $ 2,269,228 12,224 598,691 19,313 3,803,443 4,187,750 250,498 126,494 572,038 29,902 394,813 19,978 1,970,703 1,916,678 324,385 98,372 238,446 19,804 469,417 19,170 1,688,846 1,720,135 305,238 95,312 218,259 43,836 495,599 14,518 1,541,460 1,746,763 175,000 95,804 214,350 547,450 — 17,061 1,523,200 1,719,671 225,000 88,291 219,792 For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 (dollars in thousands; except per share amounts) $ 133,425 $ 85,863 $ 79,853 $ 80,157 $ 13,163 120,262 2,623 117,639 20,412 86,182 16,534 136 — 35,199 12,153 23,046 1.00 0.98 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,034 76,829 1,275 75,554 16,426 58,897 1,878 — — 31,205 10,883 20,322 1.22 1.21 7,505 72,348 2,630 69,718 18,577 57,764 — — — 30,531 10,611 19,920 1.19 1.19 $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,628 70,529 2,800 67,729 16,458 54,400 — 4,265 579 24,943 8,613 16,330 0.96 0.95 $ $ $ 87,615 14,103 73,512 7,900 65,612 17,724 52,389 — — — 30,947 10,927 20,020 1.13 1.12 31 Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data (1): Performance Ratios: Return on average assets (2) Return on average stockholders’ equity (2) Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (2)(3) Stockholders’ equity to total assets Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets (3) Average interest rate spread (4) Net interest margin (5) Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities Operating expenses to average assets (2) Efficiency ratio (2)(6) Asset Quality Ratios: Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable (7)(8) Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets (8) Allowance fro loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable (8)(9) Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing loans (8) Wealth Management: Assets under administration (000’s) Per Share Data: Cash dividends per common share At or For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 (continued) 0.62% 0.82% 0.86% 0.71% 0.87% 6.08 7.13 11.07 8.30 3.38 3.47 122.46 2.76 73.11 0.35 0.45 0.40 8.92 8.96 9.19 9.12 3.18 3.28 123.80 2.47 65.17 0.91 1.05 0.84 9.18 9.18 9.26 9.26 3.23 3.31 121.21 2.50 63.53 1.06 0.97 0.95 7.51 7.51 9.53 9.53 3.16 3.24 117.19 2.58 68.11 2.88 2.21 1.33 9.15 9.15 9.69 9.69 3.27 3.37 115.71 2.29 57.42 2.80 2.05 1.32 111.92 91.51 89.13 46.14 47.29 $ 218,336 $ 229,039 $ 225,234 $ 216,144 $ 172,879 Stockholders’ equity per common share at end of period Tangible stockholders’ equity per common share at end of period (3) Number of full-service customer facilities: 17.80 12.95 61 13.79 13.67 27 12.91 12.91 23 12.33 12.33 23 $ 0.54 $ 0.52 $ 0.49 $ 0.48 $ 0.48 12.28 12.28 24 (1) With the exception of end of year ratios, all ratios are based on average daily balances. (2) Performance ratios for 2016 include merger related expenses and the Federal Home Loan Bank advance prepayment fee totaling $16.7 million with an after tax cost of $11.9 million. Performance ratios for 2015 include merger related expenses of $1.9 million with an after tax cost of $1.3 million. Performance ratios for 2013 include expenses relating to the Federal Home Loan Bank advance prepayment fee of $4.3 million and the consolidation of two branches into newer, in-market facilities, at a cost of $579,000. The total after tax cost was $3.1 million. Performance ratios for 2012 include an additional loan loss provision of $1.8 million relating to Superstorm Sandy and $687,000 in net severance expense. The total after tax cost was $1.6 million. (3) Tangible stockholder’s equity excludes intangible assets relating to goodwill and core deposit intangible. (4) The average interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. (5) The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. (6) Efficiency ratio represents the ratio of operating expenses to the aggregate of other income and net interest income. (7) Total loans receivable includes loans receivable and loans held-for-sale. (8) Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure. Non-performing loans consist of all loans 90 days or more past due and other loans in the process of foreclosure. It is the Company’s policy to cease accruing interest on all such loans and to reverse previously accrued interest. 32 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview OceanFirst Financial Corp. has been the holding company for OceanFirst Bank since it acquired the stock of the Bank upon the Bank’s Conversion. The Company conducts business primarily through its ownership of the Bank which operates its administrative/branch office located in Toms River, 60 additional branch offices and 2 deposit production facilities located throughout Central and Southern New Jersey. The Bank also operates a wealth management office in Manchester, New Jersey and commercial loan production offices in the Philadelphia area and Mercer County, New Jersey. The Company’s results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on the Company’s interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest expense on its interest- bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Company also generates non-interest income such as income from Bankcard services, wealth management, deposit account services, the sale of alternative investments, loan originations, loan sales, Bank Owned Life Insurance and other fees. The Company’s operating expenses primarily consist of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, marketing, Federal deposit insurance, data processing, check card processing, professional fees and other general and administrative expenses. The Company’s results of operations are also significantly affected by competition, general economic conditions including levels of unemployment and real estate values as well as changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory agencies. Acquisitions On July 31, 2015, the Company completed its acquisition of Colonial American Bank ("Colonial American"), which added $142.4 million to assets, $121.2 million to loans, and $123.3 million to deposits. Colonial American’s results of operations are included in the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2016, but are only included in the results of operations for the period from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. On March 11, 2016, the Bank purchased an existing retail branch in the Toms River, New Jersey market with total deposits of $17.0 million. On May 2, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Cape Bancorp, Inc. ("Cape"), which added $1.5 billion to assets, $1.2 billion to loans, and $1.2 billion to deposits. Cape's results of operations from May 2, 2016 through December 31, 2016 are included in the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2016, but are not included in the results of operations for the corresponding prior year. On November 30, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Ocean Shore Holding Company ("Ocean Shore"), which added $995.9 million to assets, $774.0 million to loans, and $875.1 million to deposits. Ocean Shore's results of operations from December 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 are included in the consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2016, but are not included in the results of operations for the corresponding prior year. These acquisitions have provided the Company with the opportunity to grow business lines, expand geographic footprint and improve financial performance. The Company will continue to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities for those that are expected to create stockholder value. Strategy The Company operates as a full service community bank delivering commercial and residential financing solutions, deposit services and wealth management throughout the Central and Southern New Jersey region. The Bank is the largest and oldest community- based financial institution headquartered in Ocean County, New Jersey. The Bank competes with larger, out-of-market financial service providers through its local focus and the delivery of superior service. The Bank also competes with smaller in-market financial service providers by offering a broad array of products and by having an ability to extend larger credits. The Company’s strategy has been to grow profitability while limiting exposure to credit, interest rate and operational risks. To accomplish these objectives, the Bank has sought to (1) grow commercial loans receivable through the offering of commercial lending services to local businesses; (2) grow core deposits (defined as all deposits other than time deposits) through product offerings appealing to a broadened customer base; and (3) increase non-interest income by expanding the menu of fee-based products and services and investing additional resources in these product lines. The growth in these areas has occurred both organically and through acquisitions. 33 The Company will focus on prudent growth to create value for stockholders, which may include opportunistic acquisitions. The Company will also continue to build additional operational infrastructure and invest in key personnel in response to growth and changing business conditions. Growing Commercial Loans With industry consolidation eliminating most locally-headquartered competitors, the Company fills a void for locally-delivered commercial loan and deposit services. The Bank continues to grow this market segment primarily through the addition of experienced commercial lenders. Additionally, a loan production office was opened in Mercer County in the first quarter of 2015 to better serve the broader Central New Jersey market area. An additional loan production office in the Philadelphia area was acquired in the Cape transaction. As a result of these initiatives, commercial loans represented 47.6% of the Bank’s total loans at December 31, 2016, as compared to 31.9% at December 31, 2011 and only 3.6% at December 31, 1997. Commercial loan balances increased by $856.1 million, or 88.9%, in 2016, including $820.4 million acquired from the Cape and Ocean Shore transactions. Commercial loan products entail a higher degree of credit risk than is involved in one-to-four family residential mortgage lending activity. As a consequence, management continues to employ a well-defined credit policy focusing on quality underwriting and close management and Board monitoring. See “Risk Factors – Increased emphasis on commercial lending may expose the Bank to increased lending risks”. Increasing core deposits The Bank seeks to increase core deposit market share in its primary market area by improving market penetration. Deposits increased by $2.271 billion, to $4.188 billion at December 31, 2016, from $1.917 billion at December 31, 2015, including deposits of $2.140 billion acquired from Cape, Ocean Shore and the retail branch purchase. Excluding these transactions, deposits increased $130.7 million, while core deposits (all deposits excluding time deposits) increased $169.7 million. The loan to deposit ratio was 90.8% at December 31, 2016. Core account development has benefited from Bank efforts to attract business deposits in conjunction with its commercial lending operations and from an expanded mix of retail core account products. As a result of these efforts the Bank’s core deposit ratio has grown to 84.5% at December 31, 2016, as compared to 84.2% at December 31, 2011 and only 33.0% at December 31, 1997. Enhancing non-interest income Management continues to diversify the Bank’s product line and expand related resources in order to enhance non-interest income. The Bank is focused on growth opportunities in areas such as wealth management services and in Bankcard services, which includes interchange revenue, merchant services and ATM fees. The Bank also offers alternative investment products (annuities, mutual funds and life insurance) for sale through its retail branch network. Income from fees and service charges continues to be an area of focus, increasing $3.8 million, or 27.6%, to $17.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year. Of the total increase $3.1 million was related to the Colonial American, Cape and Ocean Shore acquisitions. By comparison, income from fees and service charges was $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and only $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. Branch Rationalization and Service Delivery In light of the recent acquisition activity, Management performed a comprehensive review of the Bank’s branch network, which resulted in the January 2017 announcement of the consolidation of ten branches in the legacy Cape and Ocean Shore market area by mid-year 2017, with expected annualized cost savings of $3.6 million. Further, the Bank expects to consolidate other branches in its Central New Jersey market area by the end of the year. In addition to branch consolidation, the Bank has adapted to the industry wide trend of declining branch activity by transitioning to a universal banker staffing model, with a smaller branch staff handling sales and service transactions. In certain locations, routine transactions are handled through “Personal Teller Machines”, an advanced technology with a live team member in a remote location who performs transactions for multiple Personal Teller Machines. The Bank is also investing in its multiple electronic delivery channels to enhance the customer experience. Capital Management In addition to the objectives described above, the Company determined to more actively manage its capital position to improve return on equity. The Company has, over the past few years, implemented or announced, three stock repurchase programs. The most recent plan to repurchase up to 5% of outstanding common stock was announced on July 24, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 90,000 shares of common stock for $1.9 million. At December 31, 2016, there were 154,804 shares remaining to be repurchased under the existing stock repurchase plan. Summary Interest-earning assets, both loans and securities, are generally priced against longer-term indices, while interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and borrowings, are generally priced against shorter-term indices. The Company has attempted to mitigate the 34 adverse impact of low absolute levels of interest rates by focusing on commercial loan and core deposit growth, as noted above. Based upon current economic conditions, characterized by moderate growth and low inflation, interest rates may remain at, or close to, historically low levels with increases in the Federal funds rate expected to be gradual. The continuation of the low interest rate environment may have an adverse impact on the Company’s net interest margin in future periods. In addition to the interest rate environment, the Company’s results are affected by economic conditions. Recent economic indicators point to some improvement in the U.S. economy, which expanded moderately in 2016, while measures of inflation remain subdued. Highlights of the Company’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows: Total assets increased to $5.2 billion at December 31, 2016, from $2.6 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Cape and Ocean Shore. Loans receivable, net increased $1.833 billion at December 31, 2016, as compared to December 31, 2015, which included $1.931 billion of acquired loans. Deposits increased $2.271 billion at December 31, 2016, as compared to December 31, 2015, which included $2.140 billion of acquired deposits. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $23.0 million, or $0.98 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $20.3 million, or $1.21 per diluted share for the prior year. Net income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes merger related expenses, net of tax benefit, of $11.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The merger related expenses reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.50 and $0.08, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Non-performing loans decreased 25.8%, to $13.6 million, at December 31, 2016, from $18.3 million at December 31, 2015. Non- performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable decreased to 0.35% at December 31, 2016, from 0.91% at December 31, 2015, the lowest level in the past 10 years. Risk management activities related to the acquisitions included the sale of certain higher risk loan pools, including 63 residential loans with a carrying value of $4.4 million, 72 SBA loans with a carrying value of $8.4 million, and 61 commercial loans with a carrying value of $17.5 million. The Company remains well-capitalized with a tangible common equity ratio of 8.30% at December 31, 2016. Critical Accounting Policies Note 1 to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 contains a summary of significant accounting policies. Various elements of these accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. Certain assets are carried in the consolidated statements of financial condition at estimated fair value or the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Policies with respect to the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses and judgments regarding securities and goodwill impairment are the most critical accounting policies because they are important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, involve a higher degree of complexity and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions and estimates could result in material differences in the results of operations or financial condition. These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed periodically and, at least annually, with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. Additions to the allowance arise from charges to operations through the provision for loan losses or from the recovery of amounts previously charged-off. The allowance is reduced by loan charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount management considers sufficient to provide for probable losses. The analysis considers known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio resulting from management’s continuing review of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses includes specific allowances and a general allowance, each updated on a quarterly basis. A specific allowance is determined for all non-accrual loans (excluding PCI loans) where the value of the underlying collateral can reasonably be evaluated. For these loans, the specific allowance represents the difference between the Bank’s recorded investment in the loan, net of any interim charge-offs, and the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. Acquired loans are marked to fair value on the date of acquisition. In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company performs an analysis on acquired loans to determine whether or not there has been 35 subsequent deterioration in relation to those loans. If deterioration has occurred, the Company will include these loans in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses after the initial valuation, and provide accordingly. If a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the Bank obtains an updated collateral appraisal. For residential real estate loans, the appraisal is updated annually if the loan remains delinquent for an extended period. For non-accrual commercial real estate loans, the Bank assesses whether there has likely been an adverse change in the collateral value supporting the loan. The Bank utilizes information based on its knowledge of changes in real estate conditions in its lending area to identify whether a possible deterioration of collateral value has occurred. Based on the severity of the changes in market conditions, management determines if an updated commercial real estate appraisal is warranted or if downward adjustments to the previous appraisal are warranted. If it is determined that the deterioration of the collateral value is significant enough to warrant ordering a new appraisal, an estimate of the downward adjustments to the existing appraised value is used in assessing if additional specific reserves are necessary until the updated appraisal is received. A general allowance is determined for all loans that are not individually evaluated for a specific allowance (excluding purchased loans). In determining the level of the general allowance, the Bank segments the loan portfolio into various loan segments as follows: residential real estate; commercial real estate; consumer; and commercial and industrial. The loan portfolio is further segmented by delinquency status and risk rating (Pass, Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful). An estimated loss factor is then applied to each risk rating tranche. To determine the loss factor, the Bank utilizes historical loss experience as a percent of loan principal adjusted for certain qualitative factors and the loss emergence period. The Bank’s historical loss experience is based on a rolling 24-month look-back period for all loan segments. This was selected based on (1) management’s judgment that this period captures sufficient loss events (in both dollar terms and number of individual events) to be relevant; and (2) that the Bank’s underwriting criteria and risk characteristics have remained relatively stable throughout this period. The historical loss experience is adjusted for certain qualitative factors including, but not limited to, (1) delinquency trends, (2) net charge-off trends, (3) nature and volume of the loan portfolio, (4) loan policies and underwriting standards, (5) experience and ability of lending personnel, (6) changes in current economic conditions, (7) concentrations of credit, (8) loan review system, and external factors such as (9) local competition and (10) regulation. Existing economic conditions which the Bank considered to estimate the allowance for loan losses include local and regional trends in economic growth, unemployment and real estate values. The Bank considers the applicability of each of these qualitative factors in estimating the general allowance for each loan portfolio segment. Each quarter, the conditions that existed in the 24-month look-back period are compared to current conditions to support a conclusion as to which qualitative adjustments are (or are not) deemed necessary for a particular portfolio segment. The Bank calculates and analyzes the loss emergence period on an annual basis or more frequently if conditions warrant. The Bank’s methodology is to use loss events in the past 8 quarters to determine the loss emergence period for each loan segment. The loss emergence period is specific to each loan segment and determined based on (1) the occurrence of a loss event which resulted in a potential loss and (2) confirmation of the potential loss is deemed to occur when the Bank records an initial charge-off on the loan or downgrades the risk-rating to substandard or doubtful. The Bank also maintains an unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses. The primary purpose of the unallocated component is to account for the inherent imprecision of the overall loss estimation process including the periodic updating of appraisals, commercial loan risk ratings, and continued economic uncertainty that may not be fully captured in the Company’s loss history or the qualitative factors. Upon completion of the aforementioned procedures, an overall management review is performed including ratio analyses to identify divergent trends compared with the Bank’s own historical loss experience, the historical loss experience of the Bank’s peer group, and management’s understanding of general regulatory expectations. Based on that review, management may identify issues or factors that previously had not been considered in the estimation process, which may warrant further analysis or adjustments to estimated loss factors or the allowance for loan losses. Of the Bank’s loan portfolio, 96.0% is secured by real estate, whether residential or commercial. Additionally, most of the Bank’s borrowers are located in central and southern New Jersey and the surrounding area. These concentrations may adversely affect the Bank’s loan loss experience should local real estate values decline further or should the markets served experience difficult economic conditions including increased unemployment or should the area be affected by a natural disaster such as a hurricane or flooding. Management believes the primary risk characteristics for each portfolio segment are a decline in the economy generally, including elevated levels of unemployment, a decline in real estate market values and increases in interest rates. Any one or a combination 36 of these events may adversely affect the borrowers’ ability to repay the loans, resulting in increased delinquencies, loan charge- offs and future levels of provisions. Although management believes that the Bank has established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, additions may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to make additional provisions for loan losses based upon information available to them at the time of their examination. Although management uses what it believes to be the best information available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Bank’s control. Impairment of Securities On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates whether any securities are other-than-temporarily impaired. In making this determination, the Company considers the extent and duration of the impairment, the nature and financial health of the issuer, the ability and intent to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in estimated fair value and other factors relevant to specific securities, such as the credit risk of the issuer and whether a guarantee or insurance applies to the security. If a security is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the credit related component is charged to income with the non-credit related component recognized in other comprehensive income, during the period the impairment is found to exist. As of December 31, 2016, the Company concluded that any remaining unrealized losses in the securities portfolio were temporary in nature because they were primarily related to market interest rates, market illiquidity and wider credit spreads for these types of securities. Additionally, the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost. Future events that could materially change this conclusion and require an impairment loss to be charged to operations include a change in the credit quality of the issuers or a determination that a market recovery in the foreseeable future is unlikely. Goodwill Impairment Acquired assets and liabilities, including goodwill and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Goodwill totaling $145.1 million at December 31, 2016, is not amortized but is subject to annual tests for impairment or more often if events or circumstances indicate it may be impaired. Other intangible assets, such as core deposit intangibles, are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are subject to impairment tests if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. Such evaluation of other intangible assets is based on undiscounted cash flow projections. The initial recording of goodwill and other intangible assets requires subjective judgments concerning estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The goodwill impairment analysis is generally a two-step test. However, the Company may first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company is not required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit if, based on a qualitative assessment, it is determined that it was more likely than not that the unit’s fair value was not less than its carrying amount. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an additional step must be performed. That additional step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, i.e., by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step above, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities, and identifiable intangibles, as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination at the impairment test date. An impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill and subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses are not permitted. 37 Analysis of Net Interest Income Net interest income represents the difference between income on interest-earning assets and expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income also depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rate earned or paid on them. The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown except where noted otherwise. Average balances are derived from average daily balances. The yields and costs include fees which are considered adjustments to yields. Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost (dollars in thousands) Assets: Interest-earning assets: Interest-earning deposits and short-term investments Securities (1) FHLB-NY stock Loans receivable, net (2) Total interest-earning assets Non-interest-earning assets Total assets Liabilities and Equity: Interest-bearing liabilities: Money market deposit Accounts Savings accounts Interest-bearing checking Accounts Time deposits Total FHLB advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Other borrowings Total interest-bearing liabilities Non-interest-bearing deposits Non-interest-bearing liabilities Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity $ 154,830 $ 505,124 19,028 693 8,965 805 2,782,858 122,962 0.45% $ 38,371 $ 1.77 4.23 4.42 464,415 16,891 1,826,161 44 7,425 700 77,694 0.11% $ 39,549 $ 1.60 4.14 4.25 526,637 15,972 1,603,434 41 8,535 713 70,564 3,461,840 269,622 $ 3,731,462 $ 316,977 447,484 1,266,135 422,026 2,452,622 266,981 75,227 32,029 133,425 3.85 2,345,838 85,863 3.66 2,185,592 79,853 119,035 $ 2,464,873 $ 129,775 306,151 875,326 229,785 1,541,037 253,843 73,029 26,988 0.27 0.04 0.17 1.03 0.31 1.67 0.14 3.35 858 191 2,114 4,354 7,517 4,471 102 1,073 120,677 $ 2,306,269 $ 113,406 295,289 869,383 213,566 1,491,644 219,847 64,223 27,500 0.14 0.03 0.11 1.33 0.28 1.52 0.14 2.89 187 102 952 3,060 4,301 3,850 103 780 92 112 925 2,974 4,103 2,515 78 809 2,826,859 13,163 0.47 1,894,897 9,034 0.48 1,803,214 7,505 497,166 28,454 3,352,479 378,983 327,216 14,851 2,236,964 227,909 $ 2,464,873 257,058 29,082 2,089,354 216,915 $ 2,306,269 Total liabilities and equity $ 3,731,462 Net interest income Net interest rate spread (3) Net interest margin (4) Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest- bearing liabilities $ 120,262 $ 76,829 $ 72,348 3.38% 3.47% 3.18% 3.28% 122.46% 123.80% 121.21% (1) (2) (3) (4) Amounts are recorded at average amortized cost. Amount is net of deferred loan fees, undisbursed loan funds, discounts and premiums and estimated loan loss allowances and includes loans held-for- sale and non-performing loans. Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. 38 0.10% 1.62 4.46 4.40 3.65 0.08 0.04 0.11 1.39 0.28 1.14 0.12 2.94 0.42 3.23% 3.31% Rate Volume Analysis The following table presents the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected the Company’s interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume); and (iii) the net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate. (in thousands) Interest-earning assets: Interest-earning deposits and short- term investments $ Securities FHLB-NY stock Loans receivable, net Total interest-earning assets Interest-bearing liabilities: Money market deposit accounts Savings accounts Interest-bearing checking accounts Time deposits Total FHLB advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Other borrowings Total interest-bearing liabilities Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015 Increase (Decrease) Due to Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014 Increase (Decrease) Due to Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net $ 322 696 90 42,057 43,165 408 52 523 2,105 3,088 214 (1) — 3,301 327 844 15 3,211 4,397 263 37 639 (811) 128 407 — 293 828 $ 649 $ (1) $ 4 $ 1,540 105 45,268 47,562 671 89 1,162 1,294 3,216 621 (1) 293 4,129 (1,005) 40 9,587 8,621 15 6 27 218 266 424 11 — 701 (105) (53) (2,457) (2,611) 80 (16) — (132) (68) 911 14 (29) 828 3 (1,110) (13) 7,130 6,010 95 (10) 27 86 198 1,335 25 (29) 1,529 4,481 Net change in net interest income $ 39,864 $ 3,569 $ 43,433 $ 7,920 $ (3,439) $ Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 Total assets increased by $2.574 billion to $5.167 billion at December 31, 2016, from $2.593 billion at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of the acquisitions of Cape and Ocean Shore. Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits increased by $257.4 million, to $301.4 million at December 31, 2016, from $43.9 million at December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to cash flows from a reduction in loans receivable (exclusive of acquired loans), deposit growth not utilized to reduce FHLB advances (exclusive of acquired deposits), and the issuance of subordinated notes. Loans receivable, net, increased by $1.833 billion, to $3.803 billion at December 31, 2016, from $1.971 billion at December 31, 2015, due to acquired loans of $1.931 billion. As part of the Colonial, Cape and Ocean Shore acquisitions ("Acquisition Transactions"), and the purchase of an existing retail branch in the Toms River market, the Company had outstanding goodwill of $145.1 million and core deposit intangibles of $10.9 million at December 31, 2016. Deposits increased by $2.271 billion, to $4.188 billion at December 31, 2016, from $1.917 billion at December 31, 2015, which include deposits of $2.140 billion acquired from Ocean Shore, Cape, and the purchase of an existing retail branch. Excluding those acquired, deposits increased $130.7 million, while core deposits (all deposits excluding time deposits) increased $169.7 million. The loan-to- deposit ratio at December 31, 2016 was 90.8%, as compared to 102.8% at December 31, 2015. The deposit growth offset a decrease in FHLB advances of $73.9 million, to $250.5 million at December 31, 2016 from $324.4 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in other borrowings relates to the September 2016 issuance of $35.0 million in subordinated notes at an all-in cost of 5.45% with a stated maturity of September 30, 2026. Stockholders' equity increased to $572.0 million at December 31, 2016, as compared to $238.4 million at December 31, 2015. The acquisitions of Cape and Ocean Shore added $165.9 million and $152.3 million, respectively, to stockholders' equity. At December 31, 2016, there were 154,804 shares available for repurchase under the Company's stock repurchase program adopted in July of 2014. During the year, the Company repurchased 90,000 shares under this plan at an average cost of $20.86 per share. Tangible stockholders' equity per common share decreased to $12.95 at December 31, 2016, as compared to $13.67 at December 31, 2015, due to the addition of intangible assets in the Ocean Shore and Cape acquisitions. 39 Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 General Net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $23.0 million, or $0.98 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $20.3 million, or $1.21 per diluted share for the prior year. Net income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 includes merger related expenses, net of tax benefit, of $11.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Additionally, net income for the year ended December 31, 2016, includes an FHLB Advance prepayment fee of $136,000 and a loss on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale of $12,000. Excluding these items, diluted earnings per share increased over the prior year due to higher net interest income and other income partially offset by increases in operating expenses, provision for loan losses, and average diluted shares outstanding. Interest Income Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016, increased to $133.4 million, as compared to $85.9 million, in the prior year. Average interest-earning assets increased $1.116 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year, benefiting from the interest-earning assets from the Acquisition Transactions of $900.7 million. The yield on average interest- earning assets increased to 3.85% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 3.66% for the prior year. The asset yield benefited from the accretion of purchase accounting adjustments on the Acquisition Transactions (an additional 10 basis points of yield), the higher-yielding interest-earning assets acquired from Cape, and the higher interest rate environment at the end of 2016. Interest Expense Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2016, was $13.2 million, as compared to $9.0 million in the prior year, due to an increase in average-interest bearing liabilities of $932.0 million. The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 0.47% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 0.48% in the prior year. The total cost of deposits (including non- interest bearing deposits) was 0.25% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 0.23% in the prior year. Net Interest Income Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased to $120.3 million, as compared to $76.8 million in the prior year, reflecting an increase in interest-earning assets and a higher net interest margin. Average interest-earning assets increased $1.116 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the prior year. The net interest margin increased to 3.47% for the year ended December 31, 2016, from 3.28%, for the prior year. Net interest income benefited from the accretion of purchase accounting adjustments on the Acquisition Transactions of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to $317,000 in the prior year. Provision for Loan Losses For the year ended December 31, 2016, the provision for loan losses was $2.6 million as compared to $1.3 million for the prior year. Net charge-offs increased to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to net charge-offs of $870,000 in the prior year. The increase in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to charge-offs of $2.1 million on the sale of under-performing loans , and to a lesser extent, charge-offs of $886,000 on two non-performing commercial loans. Excluding charge-offs attributable to the loan sales, net charge-offs for the year totaled $2.0 million. Non-performing loans totaled $13.6 million at December 31, 2016, as compared to $18.3 million at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, the Company’s allowance for loan losses was 0.40% of total loans, a decrease from 0.84% at December 31, 2015. These ratios exclude existing fair value credit marks of $26.0 million at December 31, 2016 on the Colonial American, Cape and Ocean Shore loans and $2.2 million at December 31, 2015 on the Colonial American loans. These loans were acquired at fair value with no related allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing loans was 111.92% at December 31, 2016, as compared to 91.51% at December 31, 2015. Other Income For the year ended December 31, 2016, other income increased to $20.4 million, as compared to $16.4 million in the prior year, an increase of $4.0 million. The increase from the prior year was primarily due to the impact of the Acquisition Transactions, which added $3.8 million to total other income for the year ended December 31, 2016. Excluding the impact of the Acquisition Transactions, other income increased by approximately $202,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2016, other income included losses of $342,000 attributable to the operations of a hotel, golf and banquet facility acquired as Other Real Estate Owned in the fourth quarter of 2015. The Bank is currently engaged in a sales process with qualified buyers for this property. 40 Operating Expenses Operating expenses increased to $102.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to $60.8 million in the prior year. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 include $16.5 million in merger related expenses, as compared to merger related expenses of $1.9 million in the prior year. Excluding merger related expenses, the increase in operating expenses over the prior year were primarily due to the Acquisition Transactions, which added operating expenses of $21.3 million; the investment in commercial lending which added expenses of $816,000; the addition of new branches (excluding those acquired in the Acquisition Transactions) which added expenses of $1.2 million; the amortization of the core deposit intangible which added expenses of $602,000; expenses associated with the Bank's re-branding effort of $363,000; and the FHLB advance prepayment fee of $136,000. Provision for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $12.2 million, as compared to $10.9 million for the prior year. The effective tax was 34.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 34.9% for the prior year. The effective tax rate was impacted in both periods by non-deductible merger related expenses. Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 General Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $20.3 million, or $1.21 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $19.9 million, or $1.19 per diluted share for the prior year. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes merger related expenses, net of tax benefit of $1.3 million, which reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.08. Excluding the merger related expenses, the increase in diluted earnings per share over the previous year was primarily due to higher net interest income and lower provisions for loan losses, partly offset by a reduction in other income and higher operating expenses. Interest Income Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2015, increased to $85.9 million, as compared to $79.9 million, in the prior year. Average interest-earning assets increased $160.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the prior year, benefiting from the interest-earning assets acquired from Colonial American which averaged $51.2 million, for the year ended December 31, 2015. The yield on average interest-earning assets increased to 3.66% for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to 3.65% for the prior year. The asset yield benefited from a shift in the mix of interest-earning assets as average loans receivable, net, increased $222.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the prior year, while average interest-earning securities decreased $62.2 million, as compared to the prior year. Interest Expense Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015, was $9.0 million, as compared to $7.5 million, in the prior year. The cost of average interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.48% for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to 0.42% in the prior year as the Company extended its borrowed funds into longer-term maturities, which carry a higher cost, to better manage the Company’s interest rate risk. Between December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2015, the Bank has extended $197.4 million of short-term funding into 3-5 year maturities, extending the weighted average maturity of term borrowings from 1.3 years to 3.1 years at December 31, 2015. The total cost of deposits (including non-interest bearing deposits) was 0.23% for the year ended December 31, 2015, unchanged compared to the prior year. Net Interest Income Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased to $76.8 million, as compared to $72.3 million in the prior year, reflecting an increase in interest-earning assets, partly offset by a lower net interest margin. Average interest-earning assets increased $160.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the prior year. The net interest margin decreased to 3.28% for the year ended December 31, 2015, from 3.31%, for the prior year. Yields and costs for the year ended December 31, 2015 were impacted by fair value adjustments to interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities acquired from Colonial American as of the July 31, 2015 merger date. 41 Provision for Loan Losses For the year ended December 31, 2015, the provision for loan losses was $1.3 million as compared to $2.6 million for the prior year. Net charge-offs decreased to $870,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to net charge-offs of $7.2 million in the prior year. In September 2014, the Company completed the bulk sale of certain non-performing residential mortgage loans which resulted in a loan charge-off of $5.0 million. The provision exceeded the net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2015 to account for loan growth. Non-performing loans totaled $18.3 million at December 31, 2015, unchanged from December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2015, the Company’s allowance for loan losses was 0.84% of total loans, a decline from 0.95% at December 31, 2014. The decline in the loan coverage ratio from the prior year was partly a result of Colonial American loans acquired at fair value, with no corresponding allowance. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing loans was 91.51% at December 31, 2015, an increase from 89.13% in the prior year. Other Income For the year ended December 31, 2015, other income decreased to $16.4 million, as compared to $18.6 million in the prior year, a decrease of $2.2 million. The 2014 amount includes gains on sales of equity securities of $1.0 million as compared to no gains in 2015. In 2014, the Company sold the servicing rights to residential mortgage loans serviced for the Federal agencies, which reduced other income by $845,000 in 2015, including the reduced gains on the sale of servicing rights and the reduction in loan servicing income. Fees and service charges declined $465,000 due to the sector wide impact of the consumer shift away from deposit overdrafts. Operating Expenses Operating expenses increased to $60.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to $57.8 million, in the prior year. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 include $1.9 million in merger expenses relating to the acquisition of Colonial American. Additionally, operating expenses attributable to Colonial American for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $1.1 million. Approximately $368,000 of these expenses were associated with operating duplicate systems from the merger date (July 31, 2015) through December 31, 2015. Compensation and employee benefits expense increased $519,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the prior year, which included $196,000 in severance related expenses due to the Company’s strategic decision to improve efficiency in the residential mortgage loan area. The increase was primarily due to higher salary expense associated with the Colonial American acquisition, personnel increases in commercial lending, and the opening of two new branches. Provision for Income Taxes The provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $10.9 million, as compared to $10.6 million for the prior year. The effective tax was 34.9% for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to 34.8% for prior year. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sales of loans, FHLB advances and other borrowings and, to a lesser extent, investment maturities. While scheduled amortization of loans is a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company has other sources of liquidity if a need for additional funds arises, including various lines of credit. At December 31, 2016, the Bank had no outstanding overnight borrowings from the FHLB, compared to $82.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2015. The Bank utilizes overnight borrowings from time-to-time to fund short-term liquidity needs. FHLB advances, including overnight borrowings, totaled $250.5 million at December 31, 2016, a decrease from $324.4 million at December 31, 2015. The Company's cash needs for the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily satisfied by principal payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale and the sale of under-performing loans, proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities, proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities, deposit growth and the issuance of subordinated notes. The cash was primarily utilized for loan originations, the purchase of loans receivable, the purchase of securities and to reduce borrowings. The Company’s cash needs for the year ended December 31, 2015 were primarily satisfied by principal payments on loans and mortgage-backed securities, proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale, proceeds from maturities of investment securities, deposit growth and increased total borrowings. The cash was principally utilized for loan originations, the purchase of loans receivable and the purchase of securities. 42 In the normal course of business, the Bank routinely enters into various commitments, primarily relating to the origination and sale of loans. At December 31, 2016, outstanding commitments to originate loans totaled $131.7 million; outstanding unused lines of credit totaled $495.6 million, of which $297.8 million were commitments to commercial borrowers and $197.8 million were commitments to consumer/construction borrowers; and, outstanding commitments to sell loans totaled $2.8 million. The Bank expects to have sufficient funds available to meet current commitments in the normal course of business. Time deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $374.5 million at December 31, 2016. Based upon historical experience, management estimates that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with the Bank. The Company has a detailed contingency funding plan and comprehensive reporting of trends on a monthly and quarterly basis which is reviewed by management. Management also monitors cash on a daily basis to determine the liquidity needs of the Bank. Additionally, management performs multiple liquidity stress test scenarios on a quarterly basis. The Bank continues to maintain significant liquidity under all stress scenarios. Under the Company’s stock repurchase program, shares of OceanFirst Financial Corp. common stock may be purchased in the open market and through other privately-negotiated transactions, from time-to-time, depending on market conditions. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock for general corporate purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 90,000 shares of common stock at a total cost of $1.9 million, compared to 373,594 shares of common stock at a total cost of $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, there were 154,804 shares remaining to be repurchased under the current stock repurchase authorization. Cash dividends on common stock declared and paid during the year ended December 31, 2016 were $12.6 million, as compared to $8.7 million for the prior year. On January 26, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of fifteen cents ($0.15) per common share. The dividend was payable on February 17, 2017 to common stockholders of record at the close of business on February 6, 2017. The primary sources of liquidity specifically available to the Company are capital distributions from the Bank and the issuance of preferred and common stock and debt. In September 2016, the Company issued $35.0 million in subordinated notes at an initial all-in cost of 5.45% and a stated maturity of September 30, 2026. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received dividend payments of $4.0 million from the Bank. The Bank elected not to pay dividends subsequent to the first quarter of 2016 in order to retain capital subsequent to the Cape and Ocean Shore acquisitions. The Company’s ability to continue to pay dividends will be largely dependent upon capital distributions from the Bank, which may be adversely affected by capital restraints imposed by the applicable regulations. The Company cannot predict whether the Bank will be permitted under applicable regulations to pay a dividend to the Company. If applicable regulations or regulatory bodies prevent the Bank from paying a dividend to the Company, the Company may not have the liquidity necessary to pay a dividend in the future or pay a dividend at the same rate as historically paid, or be able to meet current debt obligations. At December 31, 2016, OceanFirst Financial Corp. held $21.5 million in cash. The Bank is considered a “well-capitalized” institution under the Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. See “Regulation and Supervision—Federal Savings Institution Regulation – Capital Requirements.” At December 31, 2016, the Company maintained tangible common equity of $416.1 million for a tangible common equity to assets ratio of 8.30%. Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations In the normal course of operations, the Bank engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the financial statements, or are recorded in amounts that differ from the notional amounts. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used for general corporate purposes or for customer needs. Corporate purpose transactions are used to help manage credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk or to optimize capital. Customer transactions are used to manage customers’ requests for funding. These financial instruments and commitments include unused consumer lines of credit and commitments to extend credit and are discussed in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Bank also has outstanding commitments to sell loans amounting to $2.8 million. The Company entered into loan sale agreements with investors in the normal course of business. The loan sale agreements generally required the Company to repurchase loans previously sold in the event of a violation of various representations and warranties customary to the mortgage banking industry. The Company is also obligated under a loss sharing arrangement with the FHLB relating to loans sold into the MPF program. In the opinion of management, the potential exposure related to the loan sale agreements and loans sold to the FHLB is adequately provided for in the reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations included in other liabilities. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations amounted to $846,000 and $986,000, respectively. 43 The following table shows the contractual obligations of the Bank by expected payment period as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands). Further discussion of these commitments is included in Notes 9 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Contractual Obligation Debt Obligations Total Less than one year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years $ 376,992 $ 71,857 $ 148,576 $ 100,000 $ 56,559 Commitments to Originate Loans 131,686 131,686 Commitments to Fund Unused Lines of Credit — Commercial — Consumer/Construction Operating Lease Obligations Purchase Obligations 297,813 197,784 20,244 13,635 297,813 197,784 2,423 3,717 — — — 4,392 6,763 — — — 4,019 3,155 — — — 9,410 — Debt obligations include borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings and have defined terms. Commitments to originate loans and commitments to fund unused lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company’s exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments. Operating leases represent obligations entered into by the Bank for the use of land and premises. The leases generally have escalation terms based upon certain defined indexes. Purchase obligations represent legally binding and enforceable agreements to purchase goods and services from third parties and consist primarily of contractual obligations under data processing servicing agreements. Actual amounts expended vary based on transaction volumes, number of users and other factors. Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-16, “Business Combinations, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement – Period Adjustments.” The amendments in this update apply to all entities that have reported provisional amounts for items in a business combination for which the accounting is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs and during the measurement period have an adjustment to provisional amounts recognized. In these cases, the acquirer must record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2015 including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The main objective in developing this new ASU is to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more useful information. The update requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. It simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a quantitative assessment to identify impairment. The amendment eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. It requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. Financial assets and financial liabilities are to be presented separately by measurement category and the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities should be evaluated with other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU requires all lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset, measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, at the lease commencement date. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged under the new guidance. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach must be applied for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 44 The Company has begun its evaluation of the amended guidance including the potential impact on its Consolidated financial statements. To date, the Company has identified its leased real estate as within the scope of the guidance. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance, including determining whether other contracts exist that are deemed to be in scope. As such, no conclusions have yet been reached regarding the potential impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Further, to date, no guidance has been issued by either the Company's or the Bank's primary regulator with respect to how the impact of the amended standard is to be treated for regulatory capital purposes. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." The objective of the Update is to simplify accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the Update, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity also should recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. An entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current accounting) or account for forfeitures when they occur. Within the Cash Flow Statement, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity, and cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that aren't measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today's "incurred loss" approach with an "expected loss" model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available- for-sale ("AFS") debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity's assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements. While early adoption is permitted, the Company does not expect to elect that option. The Company has begun its evaluation of the amended guidance including the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements. As a result of the required change in approach toward determining estimated credit losses from the current "incurred loss" model to one based on estimated cash flows over a loan's contractual life, adjusted for prepayments (a "life of loan" model), the Company expects that the new guidance will result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses, particularly for longer duration loan portfolios. The Company also expects that the new guidance may result in an allowance for debt securities. In both cases, the extent of the change is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon portfolio composition and credit quality at the adoption date, as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time. Further, to date, no guidance has been issued by either the Company's or the Bank's primary regulator with respect to how the impact of the amended standard is to be treated for regulatory purposes. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." This ASU is intended to reduce diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. A retrospective transition method should be applied to each period presented, unless it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, then the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 45 In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." This ASU intends to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, an entity should perform its annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The ASU also eliminates the requirement for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollar amounts without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company’s operations. Unlike industrial companies, nearly all of the assets and liabilities of the Company are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the Company’s performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the price of goods and services. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Management of Interest Rate Risk (“IRR”) Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The Company’s market risk arises primarily from IRR inherent in its lending, investment and deposit-taking activities. The Company’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial change in interest rates may adversely impact the Company’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent or on the same basis. To that end, management actively monitors and manages IRR. The principal objectives of the Company’s IRR management function are to evaluate the IRR inherent in certain balance sheet accounts; determine the level of risk appropriate given the Company’s business focus, operating environment, capital and liquidity requirements and performance objectives; and manage the risk consistent with Board approved guidelines. Through such management, the Company seeks to reduce the exposure of its operations to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors its IRR as such risk relates to its operating strategies. The Bank’s Board has established an Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”) consisting of members of the Bank’s management, responsible for reviewing the asset liability policies and IRR position. ALCO meets monthly and reports trends and the Company’s IRR position to the Board on a quarterly basis. The extent of the movement of interest rates, higher or lower, is an uncertainty that could have a substantial impact on the earnings of the Company. The Bank utilizes the following strategies to manage IRR: (1) emphasizing the origination for portfolio of fixed-rate mortgage loans generally having terms to maturity of not more than fifteen years, adjustable-rate loans, floating-rate and balloon maturity commercial loans, and consumer loans consisting primarily of home equity loans and lines of credit; (2) attempting to reduce the overall interest rate sensitivity of liabilities by emphasizing core and longer-term deposits; and (3) managing the maturities of wholesale borrowings. The Bank may also sell fixed-rate mortgage loans into the secondary market. In determining whether to retain fixed-rate mortgages or to purchase fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, management considers the Bank’s overall IRR position, the volume of such loans originated or the amount of MBS to be purchased, the loan or MBS yield and the types and amount of funding sources. The Bank periodically retains fixed-rate mortgage loan production or purchases fixed-rate MBS in order to improve yields and increase balance sheet leverage. During periods when fixed-rate mortgage loan production is retained, the Bank generally attempts to extend the maturity on part of its wholesale borrowings. For the past few years, the Bank has sold most 30 year fixed-rate mortgage loan originations in the secondary market. With the recent rise in market interest rates and the reduction in refinance volume the Bank anticipates retaining most of its 30 year fixed-rate loan originations in 2017 to replace anticipated repayments of the existing residential loan portfolio. The Company currently does not participate in financial futures contracts, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance-sheet derivative financial instruments, but may do so in the future to manage IRR. The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest rate sensitive” and by monitoring an institution’s interest rate sensitivity “gap”. An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within that time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. Accordingly, during a period of rising interest 46 rates, an institution with a negative gap position theoretically would not be in as favorable a position, compared to an institution with a positive gap, to invest in higher-yielding assets. This may result in the yield on the institution’s assets increasing at a slower rate than the increase in its cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, an institution with a negative gap might experience a repricing of its assets at a slower rate than its interest-bearing liabilities, which, consequently, may result in its net interest income growing at a faster rate than an institution with a positive gap position. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored through the use of an IRR model. The following table sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at December 31, 2016, which were anticipated by the Company, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future time periods shown. At December 31, 2016, the Company’s one-year gap was negative 3.47% as compared to negative 1.71% at December 31, 2015. Except as stated below, the amount of assets and liabilities which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined in accordance with the earlier of term to repricing or the contractual maturity of the asset or liability. The table is intended to provide an approximation of the projected repricing of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016, on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated prepayments, and scheduled rate adjustments within a three month period and subsequent selected time intervals. Loans receivable reflect principal balances expected to be redeployed and/or repriced as a result of contractual amortization and anticipated prepayments of adjustable- rate loans and fixed-rate loans, and as a result of contractual rate adjustments on adjustable-rate loans. Loans were projected to prepay at rates between 9% and 25% annually. Mortgage-backed securities were projected to prepay at rates between 5% and 24% annually. Money market deposit accounts, savings accounts and interest-bearing checking accounts are assumed to have average lives of 6.0 years, 4.8 years and 6.5 years, respectively. Prepayment and average life assumptions can have a significant impact on the Company’s estimated gap. There can be no assurance that projected prepayment rates for loans and mortgage-backed securities will be achieved or that projected average lives for deposits will be realized. 3 Months or Less More than 3 Months to 1 Year More than 1 Year to 3 Years More than 3 Years to 5 Years More than 5 Years Total $ 239,051 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 239,051 61,308 40,299 — 10,043 77,604 — 21,092 130,170 — 35,891 84,934 — 546,948 725,287 1,077,014 655,812 29,158 129,876 19,313 811,702 157,492 462,883 19,313 3,816,763 887,606 812,934 1,228,276 776,637 990,049 4,695,502 83,684 97,600 1,039,969 110,517 477 40,050 71,535 61,670 263,938 1,445 77,880 141,527 128,866 181,748 148,576 52,275 95,670 91,498 85,748 100,000 205,022 266,187 458,911 672,519 304,710 1,626,713 5,152 — 647,103 250,498 92,435 — — 34,059 — 126,494 At December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands) Interest-earning assets (1): Interest-earning deposits and short-term investments Investment securities Mortgage-backed securities FHLB stock Loans receivable (2) Total interest-earning assets Interest-bearing liabilities: Money market deposit accounts Savings accounts Interest-bearing checking accounts Time deposits FHLB advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings Total interest-bearing liabilities Cumulative interest sensitivity gap Cumulative interest sensitivity gap as a percent of total interest-earning assets Interest sensitivity gap (3) $ (537,076) 1,424,682 $ (537,076) 438,638 374,296 (162,780) $ $ $ $ 678,597 549,679 386,899 $ $ 459,250 317,387 704,286 $ $ 781,071 208,978 913,264 3,782,238 913,264 913,264 $ $ (11.44)% (3.47)% 8.24% 15.00% 19.45% 19.45% (1) Interest-earning assets are included in the period in which the balances are expected to be redeployed and/or repriced as a result of anticipated prepayments, scheduled rate adjustments and contractual maturities. (2) For purposes of the gap analysis, loans receivable includes loans held-for-sale and non-performing loans gross of the allowance for loan losses, unamortized discounts and deferred loan fees. (3) Interest sensitivity gap represents the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. 47 Certain shortcomings are inherent in gap analysis. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, loan prepayment rates and average lives of deposits would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in the calculation. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their adjustable-rate loans may be impaired in the event of an interest rate increase. Another method of analyzing an institution’s exposure to IRR is by measuring the change in the institution’s economic value of equity (“EVE”) and net interest income under various interest rate scenarios. EVE is the difference between the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet contracts. The EVE ratio, in any interest rate scenario, is defined as the EVE in that scenario divided by the fair value of assets in the same scenario. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through the use of an IRR model which measures IRR by modeling the change in EVE and net interest income over a range of interest rate scenarios. The following table sets forth the Company’s EVE and net interest income projections as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands). For purposes of this table, the Company used prepayment and average life assumptions similar to those used in calculating the Company’s gap. December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Change in Interest Rates in Basis Points Economic Value of Equity Net Interest Income Change in Interest Rates in Basis Points Economic Value of Equity Net Interest Income (Rate Shock) 300 200 100 Static (100) Amount % Change EVE Ratio Amount % Change (Rate Shock) Amount % Change EVE Ratio Amount % Change $ 664,767 (1.1)% 14.1% $ 156,689 (1.0)% 300 $ 286,152 (9.0)% 11.8% $ 74,186 (9.3)% 678,347 683,492 671,878 620,675 1.0 1.7 — (7.6) 14.0 13.7 13.2 11.9 158,078 158,840 158,309 152,007 (0.1) 0.3 — (4.0) 200 100 Static (100) 303,359 313,886 314,366 300,080 (3.5) (0.2) — (4.5) 12.2 12.3 12.0 11.3 77,638 80,160 81,821 78,138 (5.1) (2.0) — (4.5) The decrease in interest rate sensitivity in a rising rate scenario at December 31, 2016, as compared to December 31, 2015, is primarily due to the increase in interest-earning deposits of $220.0 million and the increased value of core deposits. As is the case with the gap calculation, certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the EVE and net interest income IRR measurements. The model requires the making of certain assumptions which may tend to oversimplify the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. First, the model assumes that the composition of the Company’s interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured. Second, the model assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Third, the model does not take into account the Company’s business or strategic plans. Accordingly, although the above measurements do provide an indication of the Company’s IRR exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on the Company’s EVE and net interest income and can be expected to differ from actual results. 48 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders OceanFirst Financial Corp.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based on criteria established in Internal Control- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated March 15, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ KPMG LLP Short Hills, New Jersey March 15, 2017 49 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders OceanFirst Financial Corp.: We have audited OceanFirst Financial Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, OceanFirst Financial Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial condition of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated March 15, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. /s/ KPMG LLP Short Hills, New Jersey March 15, 2017 50 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ 301,373 $ Assets Cash and due from banks Securities available-for-sale (encumbered $12,192 at December 31, 2016 and $29,902 at December 31, 2015) Securities held-to-maturity, net (estimated fair value of $598,119 at December 31, 2016 and $397,763 at December 31, 2015) (encumbered $492,147 at December 31, 2016 and $371,270 at December 31, 2015) Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost Loans receivable, net Mortgage loans held-for-sale Interest and dividends receivable Other real estate owned Premises and equipment, net Servicing asset Bank Owned Life Insurance Deferred tax asset Other assets Core deposit intangible Goodwill Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Deposits Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with retail customers Federal Home Loan Bank advances Other borrowings Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance Other liabilities Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation preference, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued Common stock, $.01 par value, 55,000,000 shares authorized, 33,566,772 shares issued and 32,136,892 and 17,286,557 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Less: Unallocated common stock held by Employee Stock Ownership Plan Treasury stock, 1,429,880 and 16,280,215 shares at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively Common stock acquired by Deferred Compensation Plan Deferred Compensation Plan Liability Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 51 $ $ $ 12,224 598,691 19,313 3,803,443 1,551 11,989 9,803 71,385 228 132,172 38,787 10,105 10,924 145,064 5,167,052 4,187,750 69,935 250,498 56,559 14,030 16,242 4,595,014 $ $ 43,946 29,902 394,813 19,978 1,970,703 2,697 5,860 8,827 28,419 589 57,549 16,807 10,900 256 1,822 2,593,068 1,916,678 75,872 324,385 22,500 7,121 8,066 2,354,622 — — 336 364,433 238,192 (5,614) (2,761) (22,548) (313) 313 572,038 5,167,052 $ 336 269,757 229,140 (6,241) (3,045) (251,501) (314) 314 238,446 2,593,068 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Income (in thousands, except per share amount) Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 122,962 $ 77,694 $ Interest income: Loans Mortgage-backed securities Investment securities and other Total interest income Interest expense: Deposits Borrowed funds Total interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Other income: Bankcard services revenue Wealth management revenue Fees and services charges Loan servicing income Net gain on sale of loan servicing Net gain on sales of loans Net (loss) gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale Net loss from other real estate operations Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance Other Total other income Operating expenses: Compensation and employee benefits Occupancy Equipment Marketing Federal deposit insurance Data processing Check card processing Professional fees Other operating expense Amortization of core deposit intangible Federal Home Loan Bank advance prepayment fee Merger related expenses Total operating expenses Income before provision for income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share Average basic shares outstanding Average diluted shares outstanding See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 52 $ $ $ 6,697 3,766 133,425 7,517 5,646 13,163 120,262 2,623 117,639 4,833 2,324 10,508 250 — 986 (12) (856) 2,230 149 20,412 47,105 8,332 5,104 1,882 2,825 7,577 2,210 2,848 7,676 623 136 16,534 102,852 35,199 12,153 23,046 1.00 0.98 23,093 23,526 $ $ $ 6,051 2,118 85,863 4,301 4,733 9,034 76,829 1,275 75,554 3,537 2,187 8,124 268 111 822 — (149) 1,501 25 16,426 31,946 5,722 3,725 1,516 2,072 4,731 1,815 1,865 5,484 21 — 1,878 60,775 31,205 10,883 20,322 1.22 1.21 16,600 16,811 $ $ $ 70,564 6,845 2,444 79,853 4,103 3,402 7,505 72,348 2,630 69,718 3,478 2,280 8,589 816 408 772 1,031 (390) 1,477 116 18,577 31,427 5,510 3,278 1,795 2,128 4,239 1,934 2,267 5,186 — — — 57,764 30,531 10,611 19,920 1.19 1.19 16,687 16,797 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (in thousands) Net income Other comprehensive income: Unrealized (loss) gain on securities (net of tax benefit of $128 in 2016, tax expense of $38 in 2015, and tax benefit of $415 in 2014) Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income (net of tax benefit of $5 in 2016 and tax expense of $421 in 2014, respectively) Accretion of unrealized loss on securities reclassified to held-to- maturity (net of tax expense of $556, $562 and $497 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively) Total other comprehensive income (loss) Total comprehensive income See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 23,046 $ 20,322 $ 19,920 (186) 7 806 627 55 — 813 868 $ 23,673 $ 21,190 $ (601) (610) 721 (490) 19,430 53 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Gain Employee Stock Ownership Plan Treasury Stock Common Stock Acquired by Deferred Compensation Plan Deferred Compensati on Plan Liability Total Balance at December 31, 2013 $ — $ 336 $ 263,319 $ 206,201 $ (6,619) $ (3,616) $ (245,271) $ (665) $ 665 $ 214,350 Net income Other comprehensive loss, net of tax Stock awards Tax benefit of stock plans Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan Allocation of ESOP stock Cash dividend – $0.49 per share Exercise of stock options Purchase of 551,291 shares of common stock Sale of stock for the deferred compensation plan, net Balance at December 31, 2014 Net income Other comprehensive income, net of tax Stock awards Tax benefit of stock plans Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan Issued 660,098 treasury shares to finance acquisition Purchased 373,594 shares of common stock Allocation of ESOP stock Cash dividend – $0.52 per share Exercise of stock options Purchase of stock for the deferred compensation plan, net Balance at December 31, 2015 Net income Other comprehensive income, net of tax Stock awards Tax benefit of stock plans Treasury stock allocated to restricted stock plan Purchase 90,000 shares of common stock Allocation of ESOP stock Cash dividend – $0.54 per share Exercise of stock options Sale of stock for the deferred compensation plan, net Issued 14,547,452 treasury shares to finance acquisitions — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 336 — — — — — — — — — — — 336 — — — — — — — — — — — — 19,920 — 928 51 678 284 — — — — — — — (99) — (8,241) (67) — — — (490) — — — — — — — — — — — — — 286 — — — — — — — — (579) — — 416 (9,178) — 265,260 217,714 (7,109) (3,330) (254,612) — — 1,300 32 1,214 1,633 — 318 — — — 20,322 — — — (144) — — — (8,693) (59) — — 868 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 285 — — — — — — — (1,070) 10,185 (6,459) — — 455 — 269,757 229,140 (6,241) (3,045) (251,501) — — 1,505 62 23,046 — — — 1,046 (101) — 373 — — — 91,690 — — (12,616) (1,277) — — — 627 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 284 — — — — — — — — (945) (1,878) — — 5,266 — 226,510 — — — — — — — — — 361 (304) — — — — — — — — — — (10) (314) — — — — — — — — — 1 — — — — — — — — — — 19,920 (490) 928 51 — 570 (8,241) 349 (9,178) (361) 304 — — 218,259 20,322 — — — — — — — — — 10 314 — — — — — — — — — 868 1,300 32 — 11,818 (6,459) 603 (8,693) 396 — 238,446 23,046 627 1,505 62 — (1,878) 657 (12,616) 3,989 (1) — — 318,200 Balance at December 31, 2016 $ — $ 336 $ 364,433 $ 238,192 $ (5,614) $ (2,761) $ (22,548) $ (313) $ 313 $ 572,038 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 54 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ 23,046 $ 20,322 $ 19,920 4,786 657 1,505 623 (4,505) 157 1,656 (274) 2,623 5,798 138 38 (986) 12 — — 50,075 (47,943) (2,230) (200) 18,612 (20,781) 9,761 32,807 106,371 (37,561) 29,647 41,853 (10,021) (6,006) (59,590) 18,506 53,964 6,394 73,470 310 32,168 (23,571) 3,744 (6,670) 16,727 31,965 271,700 3,335 603 1,300 21 (317) 245 1,991 55 1,275 1,441 (269) — (822) — 192 (111) 49,436 (47,110) (1,501) 68 1,670 (3,690) 7,812 28,134 (146,416) (22,054) — — (9,972) (16,349) (10,312) — 46,292 — 61,081 — 38,663 (39,157) 3,342 (3,891) — 3,703 2,916 570 928 — — 1,016 2,816 63 2,630 82 (46) — (772) (1,031) 3,155 (408) 39,641 (42,571) (1,477) (126) 151 124 7,661 27,581 (152,852) (20,574) 19,058 8,439 (20,547) (5,003) (35,203) 35,005 7,711 — 57,199 — 35,269 (39,921) 4,016 (3,970) — — (95,070) (111,373) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment Allocation of ESOP stock Stock awards Amortization of core deposit intangible Net accretion/amortization of purchase accounting adjustments Amortization of servicing asset Net premium amortization in excess of discount accretion on securities Net (accretion) amortization of deferred fees and discounts on loans Provision for loan losses Deferred tax provision Net loss (gain) on sales of other real estate owned Net loss on sale of fixed assets Net gain on sales of loans Net loss (gain) on sales of investment securities available for sale Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights Net gain on sale of loan servicing Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans originated for sale Increase in value of Bank Owned Life Insurance (Increase) decrease in interest and dividends receivable Decrease in other assets (Decrease) increase in other liabilities Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable Purchase of loans receivable Proceeds from sale of under-performing loans Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities available-for-sale Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities held-to-maturity Proceeds from maturities and calls of mortgage backed securities held-to-maturity Principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity Proceeds from Bank Owned Life Insurance Proceeds from the redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Net proceeds from sale and acquisition of other real estate owned Purchases of premises and equipment Cash acquired, net of cash paid for branch acquisition Cash acquired, net of cash consideration paid for acquisitions Net cash used in investing activities 55 OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued) (in thousands) Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 Cash flows from financing activities: Increase in deposits (Decrease) increase in short-term borrowings Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances Net proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances Repayments of other borrowings Increase (decrease) in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance Exercise of stock options Purchase of treasury stock Dividends paid Tax benefit of stock plans Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities Net increase in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of year Cash and due from banks at end of year Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest Income taxes Non-cash investing activities: Accretion of unrealized loss on securities reclassified to held-to- maturity Loans charged-off, net Transfer of loans receivable to other real estate owned Acquisition: Non-cash assets acquired: Securities Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Loans Premises & equipment Other real estate owned Deferred tax asset Other assets Goodwill and other intangible assets, net Total non-cash assets acquired Liabilities assumed: Deposits Federal Home Loan Bank advances Other liabilities Total liabilities assumed Total consideration for acquisition See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 56 131,308 (175,137) 55,161 33,898 (74,153) (10,000) 2,286 3,989 (1,878) (12,616) 62 (47,080) 257,427 43,946 73,284 (27,740) 55,000 — (6,853) (5,000) 798 396 (6,459) (8,693) 32 74,765 7,829 36,117 $ $ 301,373 $ 43,946 $ 13,201 $ 10,912 8,928 $ 10,562 1,406 4,162 1,833 1,375 870 6,979 $ 305,139 $ 6,758 $ 7,932 1,930,853 41,067 3,025 28,197 97,162 154,211 2,567,586 2,123,440 128,160 29,747 2,281,347 286,239 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 314 121,466 — 257 3,227 8,279 2,099 142,400 123,346 6,800 309 130,455 11,945 $ $ $ $ (26,628) 24,746 215,000 — (110,000) — (148) 349 (9,178) (8,241) 51 85,951 2,159 33,958 36,117 7,243 11,801 1,218 7,243 4,289 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OceanFirst Bank (the “Bank”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, OceanFirst REIT Holdings, Inc., and its wholly- owned subsidiary OceanFirst Management Corp., and its wholly-owned subsidiary OceanFirst Realty Corp., OceanFirst Services, LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary OFB Reinsurance, Ltd., 975 Holdings, LLC, Hooper Holdings, LLC., TRREO Holdings LLC, OCHB Investment Co., OCHB Preferred Corp, Casaba Real Estate Holdings Corporation, and Cohensey Bridge, L.L.C.. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Business The Bank provides a range of community banking services to customers through a network of branches and offices in Central and Southern New Jersey. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions; it is also subject to the regulations of certain regulatory agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with these accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, and the evaluation of securities and goodwill for other-than-temporary impairment. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods. Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents consist of interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and loans of Federal funds. For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Securities Securities include securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale. Management determines the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. If management has the positive intent not to sell and the Company would not be required to sell prior to maturity, the securities are classified as held-to-maturity securities. Such securities are stated at amortized cost. During 2013, the Company transferred $536.0 million of previously designated available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity designation at estimated fair value. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities as an investment until maturity or call. The securities transferred had an unrealized loss of $13.3 million at the time of transfer which continues to be reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of subsequent amortization, which is being recognized over the life of the securities. Securities in the available-for-sale category are securities which the Company may sell prior to maturity as part of its asset/liability management strategy. Such securities are carried at estimated fair value and unrealized gains and losses, net of related tax effect, are excluded from earnings, but are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and as part of comprehensive income. Discounts and premiums on securities are accreted or amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated lives of the securities, including the effect of prepayments. Gains or losses on the sale of such securities are included in other income using the specific identification method. 57 Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Securities One of the significant estimates related to securities is the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments. If a determination is made that a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company will estimate the amount of the unrealized loss that is attributable to credit and all other non-credit related factors. The credit related component will be recognized as an other-than- temporary impairment charge in non-interest income as a component of gain (loss) on securities, net. The non-credit related component will be recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The evaluation of securities for impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process, which is subject to risks and uncertainties and is intended to determine whether declines in the estimated fair value of investments should be recognized in current period earnings. The risks and uncertainties include changes in general economic conditions, the issuer’s financial condition and/or future prospects, the effects of changes in interest rates or credit spreads and the expected recovery period. On a quarterly basis the Company evaluates the securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment. Securities that are in an unrealized loss position are reviewed to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment is present based on certain quantitative factors. The primary factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary include: (a) the length of time and extent to which the estimated fair value has been less than cost or amortized cost and the expected recovery period of the security, (b) the financial condition, credit rating and future prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the debtor is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments and (d) whether the Company intends to sell the security and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the security. Loans Receivable Loans receivable, other than loans held-for-sale, are stated at unpaid principal balance, plus unamortized premiums less unearned discounts, net of deferred loan origination and commitment fees and costs, and the allowance for loan losses. Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net fee or cost is recognized in interest income using the level-yield method over the contractual life of the specifically identified loans, adjusted for actual prepayments. For each loan class, a loan is considered past due when a payment has not been received in accordance with the contractual terms. Loans which are more than 90 days past due, including impaired loans, and other loans in the process of foreclosure are placed on non-accrual status. Interest income previously accrued on these loans, but not yet received, is reversed in the current period. Any interest subsequently collected is credited to income in the period of recovery only after the full principal balance has been brought current. A loan is returned to accrual status when all amounts due have been received and the remaining principal balance is deemed collectible. A loan is considered impaired when it is deemed probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company has defined the population of impaired loans to be all non-accrual commercial real estate, multi-family, land, construction and commercial and industrial loans in excess of $250,000. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the estimated fair value of the collateral or the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows. Smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, such as residential mortgage loans and consumer loans, are specifically excluded from the impaired loan portfolio, except when they are modified in a trouble debt restructuring. Loan losses are charged-off in the period the loans, or portion, thereof are deemed uncollectible, generally after the loan becomes 120 days delinquent. The Company will record a loan charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to sell, if it is determined that it is probable that recovery will come primarily from the sale of the collateral. Purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans are acquired at a discount that is due, in part, to credit quality. PCI loans are initially recorded at fair value (as determined by the present value of expected future cash flows) with no allowance for loan losses. Interest income on loans acquired at a discount is based on the acquired loans’ expected cash flows. The acquired loans may be aggregated and accounted for as a pool of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flow. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loans, or the “accretable yield”, is recognized as interest income utilizing the level-yield method over the life of each pool. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the acquisition are recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the pool over its remaining life, while decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment through a loss provision and an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Therefore, the allowance for loan losses on these impaired pools reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (representing the present value of all cash flows that were expected at acquisition but currently are not expected to be received). 58 The Bank periodically evaluates the remaining contractual required payments due and estimates of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations require the continued use of key assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Changes in the contractual required payments due and estimated cash flows expected to be collected may result in changes in the accretable yield and non-accretable difference or reclassifications between accretable yield and the non-accretable difference. For the pools with better than expected cash flows, the forecasted increase is recorded as an additional accretable yield that is recognized as a prospective increase to interest income on loans. Loans Held for Sale The Company regularly sells part of its mortgage loan originations in order to manage interest rate risk and liquidity. The Bank has generally sold fixed-rate mortgage loans with final maturities in excess of 15 years. In determining whether to retain mortgages, management considers the Company’s overall interest rate risk position, the volume of such loans, the loan yield and the types and amount of funding sources. The Company may also retain mortgage loan production in order to improve yields and increase balance sheet leverage. In addition, management periodically considers the sale of commercial and other loans as part of its management of credit risk. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of unpaid principal balance, net, or estimated fair value on an aggregate basis. Estimated fair value is determined based on bid quotations from securities dealers. Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for loan losses is a valuation account that reflects probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated fair value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. Additions to the allowance arise from charges to operations through the provision for loan losses or from the recovery of amounts previously charged-off. The allowance is reduced by loan charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount management considers sufficient to provide for probable losses. The analysis considers known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio resulting from management’s continuing review of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The Bank’s allowance for loan losses includes specific allowances and a general allowance, each updated on a quarterly basis. A specific allowance is determined for all non-accrual loans (excluding PCI loans) where the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral can reasonably be evaluated. For these loans, the specific allowance represents the difference between the Bank’s recorded investment in the loan, net of any interim charge-offs, and the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. Acquired loans are marked to fair value on the date of acquisition. In conjunction with the quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company performs an analysis on acquired loans to determine whether or not there has been subsequent deterioration in relation to those loans. If deterioration has occurred, the Company will include these loans in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses. If a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the Bank obtains an updated collateral appraisal. For residential real estate loans, the appraisal is updated annually if the loan remains delinquent for an extended period. For non-accrual commercial real estate loans, the Bank assesses whether there has been an adverse change in the collateral value supporting the loan. The Bank utilizes information based on its knowledge of changes in real estate conditions in its lending area to identify whether a possible deterioration of collateral value has occurred. Based on the severity of the changes in market conditions, management determines if an updated commercial real estate appraisal is warranted or if downward adjustments to the previous appraisal are warranted. If it is determined that the deterioration of the collateral value is significant enough to warrant ordering a new appraisal, an estimate of the downward adjustments to the existing appraised value is used in assessing if additional specific reserves are necessary until the updated appraisal is received. A general allowance is determined for all loans that are not individually evaluated for a specific allowance (excluding purchased loans). In determining the level of the general allowance, the Bank segments the loan portfolio into various loan segments as follows: residential real estate; commercial real estate; consumer; and commercial and industrial. Acquired loans (including PCI loans) are initially valued at an estimated fair value on the date of acquisition, with no initial related allowance for loan losses. These loans are periodically evaluated for impairment after initial valuation. The loan portfolio is further segmented by delinquency status and risk rating (Pass, Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful). An estimated loss factor is then applied to each risk rating tranche. To determine the loss factor, the Bank utilizes historical loss experience as a percent of loan principal adjusted for certain qualitative factors and the loss emergence period. 59 The Bank’s historical loss experience is based on a rolling 24-month look-back period for all loan segments. This was selected based on (1) management’s judgment that this period captures sufficient loss events (in both dollar terms and number of individual events) to be relevant; and (2) that the Bank’s underwriting criteria and risk characteristics have remained relatively stable throughout this period. The historical loss experience is adjusted for certain qualitative factors including, but not limited to, (1) delinquency trends, (2) net charge-off trends, (3) nature and volume of the loan portfolio, (4) loan policies and underwriting standards, (5) experience and ability of lending personnel, (6) changes in current economic conditions, (7) concentrations of credit, (8) loan review system, and external factors such as (9) local competition and (10) regulation. The Bank considers the applicability of each of these qualitative factors in estimating the general allowance for each loan portfolio segment. Each quarter, the conditions that existed in the 24- month look-back period are compared to current conditions to support a conclusion as to which qualitative adjustments are (or are not) deemed necessary for a particular portfolio segment. The Bank calculates and analyzes the loss emergence period on an annual basis or more frequently if conditions warrant. The Bank’s methodology is to use loss events in the past 8 quarters to determine the loss emergence period for each loan segment. The loss emergence period is specific to each loan segment and determined based on (1) the occurrence of a loss event which resulted in a potential loss and (2) confirmation of the potential loss is deemed to occur when the Bank records an initial charge-off on the loan or downgrades the risk-weighting to substandard or doubtful. The Bank also maintains an unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses. The primary purpose of the unallocated component is to account for the inherent imprecision of the overall loss estimation process including the periodic updating of appraisals, commercial loan risk ratings, and continued economic uncertainty that may not be fully captured in the Company’s loss history or the qualitative factors. Upon completion of the aforementioned procedures, an overall management review is performed including ratio analyses to identify divergent trends compared with the Bank’s own historical loss experience, the historical loss experience of the Bank’s peer group and management’s understanding of general regulatory expectations. Based on that review, management may identify issues or factors that previously had not been considered in the estimation process, which may warrant further analysis or adjustments to estimated loss factors or the allowance for loan losses. Reserve for Repurchased Loans and Loss Sharing Obligations The reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations relates to potential losses on loans sold which may have to be repurchased due to a violation of representations and warranties and an estimate of the Bank’s obligation under a loss sharing arrangement for loans sold to the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"). Provisions for losses are charged to gain on sale of loans and credited to the reserve while actual losses are charged to the reserve. The reserve represents the Company's estimate of the total losses expected to occur and is considered to be adequate by management based upon the Company's evaluation of the potential exposure related to the loan sale agreements over the period of repurchase risk. The reserve for repurchased loans and loss sharing obligations is included in other liabilities on the Company's consolidated statement of financial condition. Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less estimated costs to sell. When a property is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over estimated fair value is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Operating results from other real estate owned, including rental income, operating expenses, gains and losses realized from the sales of other real estate owned and subsequent write-downs are recorded as incurred. Premises and Equipment Land is carried at cost and premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization or, in the case of acquired premises, the value on the acquisition date. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or leases. Generally, depreciable lives are as follows: computer equipment: 3 years; furniture, fixtures and other electronic equipment: 5 years; building improvements: 10 years; and buildings: 30 years. Repair and maintenance items are expensed and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in current operations. Income Taxes The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using 60 enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Any interest and penalties on taxes payable are included as part of the provision for income taxes. Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-16, “Business Combinations, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement – Period Adjustments”. The amendments in this update apply to all entities that have reported provisional amounts for items in a business combination for which the accounting is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs and during the measurement period have an adjustment to provisional amounts recognized. In these cases, the acquirer must record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016 including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The main objective in developing this new ASU is to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more useful information. The update requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. It simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a quantitative assessment to identify impairment. The amendment eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. It requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. Financial assets and financial liabilities are to be presented separately by measurement category and the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities should be evaluated with other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU requires all lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset, measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments, at the lease commencement date. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged under the new guidance. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective approach must be applied for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The company is currently assessing the impact that the guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has begun its evaluation of the amended guidance including the potential impact on its Consolidated financial statements. To date, the Company has identified its leased real estate as within the scope of the guidance. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance, including determining whether other contracts exist that are deemed to be in scope. As such, no conclusions have yet been reached regarding the potential impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Further, to date, no guidance has been issued by either the Company's or the Bank's primary regulator with respect to how the impact of the amended standard is to be treated for regulatory capital purposes. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." The objective of the Update is to simplify accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the Update, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity also should recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. An entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current accounting) or account for forfeitures when they occur. Within the Cash Flow Statement, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity, and cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 61 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that aren't measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today's "incurred loss" approach with an "expected loss" model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available- for-sale ("AFS") debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity's assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. While early adoption is permitted, the Company does not expect to elect that option. The Company has begun its evaluation of the amended guidance including the potential impact on its consolidated financial statements. As a result of the required change in approach toward determining estimated credit losses from the current "incurred loss" model to one based on estimated cash flows over a loan's contractual life, adjusted for prepayments (a "life of loan" model), the Company expects that the new guidance will result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses, particularly for longer duration loan portfolios. The Company also expects that the new guidance may result in an allowance for debt securities. In both cases, the extent of the change is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon portfolio composition and credit quality at the adoption date, as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time. Further, to date, no guidance has been issued by either the Company's or the Bank's primary regulator with respect to how the impact of the amended standard is to be treated for regulatory purposes. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." This ASU is intended to reduce diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. A retrospective transition method should be applied to each period presented, unless it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, then the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." This ASU intends to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, an entity should perform its annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The ASU also eliminates the requirement for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes items recorded directly in equity, such as unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale and accretion of unrealized loss on securities reclassified to held-to-maturity. Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) Bank Owned Life Insurance is accounted for using the cash surrender value method and is recorded at its realizable value. Part of the Company’s BOLI is invested in a separate account insurance product which is invested in a fixed income portfolio. The separate account includes stable value protection which maintains realizable value at book value with investment gains and losses amortized over future periods. Increases in cash surrender value are included in other non-interest income, while proceeds from death benefits are recorded as a reduction to the carrying value. 62 Defined Benefit Plan As part of the Cape Bancorp, Inc. ("Cape") acquisition, the Bank acquired a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, also now known as the Cape Bank Defined Benefit Plan. The Plan previously froze benefits as of December 31, 2008 for employees eligible to participate prior to January 1, 2008. The Bank is in the process of terminating the Plan and distributing accrued benefits and recorded a $3.7 million liability as part of the acquisition date purchase accounting adjustment. Intangible Assets Intangible assets resulting from acquisitions under the acquisition method of accounting consist of goodwill and core deposit intangible. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of identifiable net assets acquired through purchase acquisitions. Goodwill with an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment between annual measurement dates. The Company prepares a qualitative assessment in determining whether goodwill may be impaired. The factors considered in the assessment include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions and overall financial performance of the Company, among others. The Company completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of August 30, 2016. Based upon its qualitative assessment of goodwill, the Company concluded that goodwill was not impaired and no further quantitative analysis was warranted. Segment Reporting The Company's operations are solely in the financial services industry and include providing traditional banking and other financial services to its customers. The Company operates primarily in the geographical regions of Central and Southern New Jersey. Management makes operating decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of the Bank's consolidated financial results. Therefore, the Company has a single operating segment for financial reporting purposes. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus potential common stock, utilizing the treasury stock method. All share amounts exclude unallocated shares of stock held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) and the Incentive Plan. Note 2: Regulatory Matters Applicable regulations require the Bank to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2016, the Bank was required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.0%; a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%; a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets of 6.0%; and, a minimum ratio of total (core and supplementary) capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. Under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Federal regulators are required to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution’s financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of banking institutions into five categories: well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Generally an institution is considered well-capitalized if it has a Tier 1 capital ratio of 5.0%; a common equity Tier1 risk-based ratio of at least 6.5%; a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of at least 8.0%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bank was considered well-capitalized. 63 The following is a summary of the Bank and the Company's regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 compared to the regulatory minimum capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution then in effect (in thousands). As of December 31, 2016 Actual For capital adequacy purposes To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action Bank: Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Tier 1 capital (to average assets) $ 445,576 10.08% (2) $ 176,856 4.000% $ 221,071 5.00% Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets) Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) OceanFirst Financial Corp: 445,576 445,576 461,386 12.67 12.67 13.12 Tier 1 capital (to average assets) $ 440,552 9.96% (2) $ Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets) Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) 426,855 440,552 491,362 12.12 12.51 13.95 180,178 232,913 303,227 177 181 233 304 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) 5.125 6.625 8.625 4.000% 5.125 6.625 8.625 228,519 281,254 351,567 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.50 8.00 10.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A As of December 31, 2015 Actual For capital adequacy purposes To be well-capitalized under prompt corrective action Bank: Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Tier 1 capital (to average assets) Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets) Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) OceanFirst Financial Corp: Tier 1 capital (to average assets) Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets) Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ $ 229,306 229,306 229,306 246,106 250,324 241,856 250,324 267,124 8.91% (2) 12.72 $ 12.72 13.65 9.72% $ 13.40 13.87 14.80 102,935 81,114 108,152 144,203 102,984 81,234 108,312 144,416 $ 4.000% 4.500 6.000 8.000 (1) (1) (1) 128,669 117,165 144,203 180,253 4.000% 4.500 6.000 8.000 N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.00% 6.50 8.00 10.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A (1) Includes the Capital Conservation Buffer of 0.625%. (2) Tier 1 capital ratios are calculated based on outstanding capital at the end of the quarter divided by average assets for the quarter. The average assets for the fourth quarter exclude the assets acquired from Ocean Shore for the period from October 1, 2016 through November 30, 2016. The Tier 1 capital ratios for the Bank and the Company based on total assets as of the end of the period are 8.85% and 8.75%, respectively. The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in incrementally, starting at 0.625% on January 1, 2016, and increasing to 1.25% on January 1, 2017, 1.875% on January 1, 2018, and 2.50% on January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective. Capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments are limited if the capital conservation buffer is not maintained. Applicable regulations also impose limitations upon capital distributions by the Bank, such as dividends and payments to repurchase or otherwise acquire shares. The Bank may not declare or pay cash dividends on or repurchase any of its shares of common stock if the effect thereof would cause stockholders’ equity to be reduced below applicable regulatory capital minimum requirements or if such declaration and payment would otherwise violate regulatory requirements. 64 Note 3. Business Combination As a result of the following acquisitions, the Company incurred merger related expenses of $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Merger related expenses were classified as change in control payments, professional fees, IT expenses and other/miscellaneous fees with amounts totaling $5.5 million, $5.7 million, $5.1 million and $200,000, respectively. Branch Acquisition On March 11, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of an existing retail branch in the Toms River market ("Toms River Retail Branch"). Under the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated July 31, 2015, the Company paid a deposit premium of $340,000, equal to 2.50% of core deposits; i.e., all deposits other than time deposits, government deposits, and fiduciary accounts. Up to 1.00% of the deposit premium was contingent on the core deposit balance seventy-five days after closing. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price has been allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values, net of tax. The excess of consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The following table presents the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition (in thousands): Assets Acquired Cash and cash equivalents Loans Other assets Core deposit intangible Total assets acquired Liabilities Assumed Deposits Other liabilities assumed Total liabilities assumed Goodwill At March 11, 2016 Book Value Fair Value Adjustment Fair Value $ $ $ $ 16,727 $ 9 15 — 16,751 $ 16,953 $ 138 17,091 $ — $ — $ — $ 66 66 $ $ 4 $ — 4 $ $ 16,727 9 15 66 16,817 16,957 138 17,095 278 65 Cape Bancorp Acquisition On May 2, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Cape Bancorp, Inc. ("Cape"), which after purchase accounting adjustments added $1.5 billion to assets, $1.2 billion to loans, and $1.2 billion to deposits. Total consideration paid for Cape was $196.4 million, including cash consideration of $30.5 million. Cape was merged with and into the Company as of the date of acquisition. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price has been allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values, net of tax. The excess of consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition for Cape, net of total consideration paid (in thousands): (in thousands) Total Purchase Price: Assets acquired: Cash and cash equivalents Securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Loans: Specific credit fair value on credit impaired loans General credit fair value Interest rate fair value Reverse allowance for loan losses Reverse net deferred fees, premiums and discounts Premises and equipment Other real estate owned Deferred tax asset Other assets Core deposit intangible Total assets acquired Liabilities assumed: Deposits Borrowings Other liabilities Total liabilities assumed Net assets acquired Goodwill recorded in the merger At May 2, 2016 Purchase Accounting Adjustments Cape Book Value Estimated Fair Value $ 196,403 $ 30,025 $ 218,577 1,169,568 — $ 361 30,025 218,938 1,156,807 — — — — — 27,972 2,343 9,407 61,793 831 1,520,516 (1,247,688) (123,587) (7,611) (1,378,886) $ 141,630 $ (5,859) (20,545) 1,888 9,931 1,824 (1,973) (408) 10,993 — 2,887 (901) (679) (879) (5,398) (6,956) (7,857) — — — — — 25,999 1,935 20,400 61,793 3,718 1,519,615 (1,248,367) (124,466) (13,009) (1,385,842) 133,773 62,630 $ The calculation of goodwill is subject to change for up to one year after the date of acquisition as additional information relative to the closing date estimates and uncertainties become available. As the Company finalizes its review of the acquired assets and liabilities, certain adjustments to the recorded carrying values may be required. 66 Ocean Shore Holding Co. Acquisition On November 30, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Ocean Shore Holding Co. ("Ocean Shore"), which after purchase accounting adjustments added $995.9 million to assets, $774.0 million to loans, and $875.1 million to deposits. Total consideration paid for Ocean Shore was $180.7 million, including cash consideration of $28.4 million. Ocean Shore was merged with and into the Company on the date of acquisition. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under this method of accounting, the purchase price has been allocated to the respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values, net of tax. The excess of consideration paid over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition for Ocean Shore, net of total consideration paid (in thousands): Ocean Shore Book Value At November 30, 2016 Purchase Accounting Adjustments Estimated Fair Value Cash and cash equivalents $ 60,871 $ (in thousands) Total Purchase Price: Assets acquired: Securities and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Loans: Specific credit fair value on credit impaired loans General credit fair value Interest rate fair value Reverse allowance for loan losses Reverse net deferred fees, premiums and discounts Premises and equipment Other real estate owned Deferred tax asset Other assets Core deposit intangible Total assets acquired Liabilities assumed: Deposits Borrowings Other liabilities Total liabilities assumed Net assets acquired Goodwill recorded in the merger 94,109 790,396 — — — — — 11,696 1,090 5,587 35,369 348 999,466 (874,301) (3,694) (17,629) (895,624) — 24 (2,062) (8,127) (5,779) 3,265 (3,647) 3,372 — 2,210 — 7,158 (3,586) (772) — 891 119 $ $ $ 180,732 60,871 94,133 774,046 — — — — — 15,068 1,090 7,797 35,369 7,506 995,880 (875,073) (3,694) (16,738) (895,505) 100,375 80,357 $ 103,842 $ (3,467) The calculation of goodwill is subject to change for up to one year after the date of acquisition as additional information relative to the closing date estimates and uncertainties become available. As the Company finalizes its review of the acquired assets and liabilities, certain adjustments to the recorded carrying values may be required. Supplemental Pro Forma Financial Information The following table presents financial information regarding the former Cape operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition (May 2, 2016) through December 31, 2016 and regarding the former Ocean Shore operations included in the Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition (December 1, 2016) through December 31, 2016. In addition, the table provides condensed pro forma financial information assuming the Cape and Ocean Shore 67 acquisitions had been completed as of January 1, 2016, for the year ended December 31, 2016, and as of January 1, 2015, for the year ended December 31, 2015. The table has been prepared for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been attained had the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it indicative of future results. Furthermore, the pro forma information does not reflect management’s estimate of any revenue- enhancing opportunities nor anticipated cost savings that may have occurred as a result of the integration and consolidation of Cape's and Ocean Shore's operations. The pro forma information shown reflects adjustments related to certain purchase accounting fair value adjustments; amortization of core deposit and other intangibles; and related income tax effects. (in thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Non-interest income Non-interest expense Net income Earnings per share: Fully diluted Core Deposit Intangible Cape Actual from May 2, 2016 to December 31, 2016 34,565 Ocean Shore Actual from December 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 Pro forma Year ended December 31, 2016 Pro forma Year ended December 31, 2015 $ 3,109 $ 166,462 $ 498 3,503 19,258 12,311 $ — 349 1,337 1,397 $ $ 4,400 25,761 161,090 16,772 0.52 $ $ 159,351 4,639 33,292 123,762 43,471 1.39 The estimated future amortization expense for the core deposit intangible over the next five years is as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter $ $ 2,039 1,828 1,618 1,408 1,197 2,834 10,924 Fair Value Measurement of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed The methods used to determine the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Retail Branch, Cape and Ocean Shore acquisitions were as follows. Refer to Note 15, Fair Value Measurements, for a discussion of the fair value hierarchy. Securities The estimated fair values of the securities were calculated utilizing Level 2 inputs. The securities acquired are bought and sold in active markets. Prices for these instruments were obtained through security industry sources that actively participate in the buying and selling of securities. Loans The acquired loan portfolio was valued utilizing Level 3 inputs and included the use of present value techniques employing cash flow estimates and incorporated assumptions that marketplace participants would use in estimating fair values. In instances where reliable market information was not available, the Company used its own assumptions in an effort to determine reasonable fair value. Specifically, the Company utilized three separate fair value analyses which a market participant would employ in estimating the total fair value adjustment. The three separate fair valuation methodologies used were: 1) interest rate loan fair value analysis; 2) general credit fair value adjustment; and 3) specific credit fair value adjustment. To prepare the interest rate fair value analysis, loans were grouped by characteristics such as loan type, term, collateral and rate. Market rates for similar loans were obtained from various external data sources and reviewed by Company management for reasonableness. The average of these rates was used as the fair value interest rate a market participant would utilize. A present value approach was utilized to calculate the interest rate fair value adjustment. 68 The general credit fair value adjustment was calculated using a two part general credit fair value analysis: 1) expected lifetime losses and 2) estimated fair value adjustment for qualitative factors. The expected lifetime losses were calculated after consideration of historical losses of the Company, the acquired bank and peer banks. The adjustment related to qualitative factors was impacted by general economic conditions and the risk related to lack of experience with the originator’s underwriting process. To calculate the specific credit fair value adjustment the Company reviewed the acquired loan portfolio for loans meeting the definition of an impaired loan with deteriorated credit quality. Loans meeting this criteria were reviewed by comparing the contractual cash flows to expected collectible cash flows. The aggregate expected cash flows less the acquisition date fair value resulted in an accretable yield amount which will be recognized over the life of the loans on a level yield basis as an adjustment to yield. Premises and Equipment Fair values are based upon appraisals from independent third parties. In addition to owned properties, Cape operated eight properties subject to lease agreements, and Ocean Shore operated two properties subject to lease agreements. Deposits and Core Deposit Premium Core deposit premium represents the value assigned to non-interest bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing checking, money market and saving accounts assumed as part of the acquisition. The core deposit premium value represents the future economic benefit, including the present value of future tax benefits, of the potential cost saving from assuming the core deposits as part of an acquisition compared to the cost of alternative funding sources and is valued utilizing Level 2 inputs. Time deposits are not considered to be core deposits as they are assumed to have a low expected average life upon acquisition. The fair value of time deposits represents the present value of the expected contractual payments discounted by market rates for similar time deposits and is valued utilizing Level 2 inputs. Borrowings Fair value estimates are based on discounting contractual cash flows using rates which approximate the rates offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities. Note 4: Securities The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands) Available-for-sale: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations Held-to-maturity: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations State and municipal obligations Corporate debt securities Other investments Total investment securities Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA GNMA SBA Total mortgage-backed securities Total held-to-maturity Total securities $ $ $ $ Amortized Cost As of December 31, 2016 Gross Unrealized Losses Gross Unrealized Gains Estimated Fair Value 12,542 $ — $ (318) $ 12,224 69 10 85 — 164 195 2,175 119 28 2,517 2,681 2,681 $ — $ (856) (6,001) (228) (7,085) (2,457) (2,524) (364) — (5,345) $ $ (12,430) $ (12,748) $ 20,029 38,309 71,141 8,550 138,029 141,754 217,096 92,230 8,975 460,055 598,084 610,308 19,960 $ 39,155 77,057 8,778 144,950 144,016 217,445 92,475 8,947 462,883 607,833 620,375 $ $ 69 Available-for-sale: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations Held-to-maturity: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations State and municipal obligations Corporate debt securities Total investment securities Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA GNMA Total mortgage-backed securities Total held-to-maturity Total securities Amortized Cost As of December 31, 2015 Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses (continued) Estimated Fair Value $ $ $ $ 29,906 $ 23 $ (27) $ 29,902 55,178 $ 13,311 56,000 124,489 120,116 160,254 502 280,872 405,361 435,267 $ $ 87 18 — 105 364 3,039 95 3,498 3,603 3,626 $ (59) $ (3) (8,527) (8,589) (1,489) (1,123) — (2,612) $ $ (11,201) $ (11,228) $ 55,206 13,326 47,473 116,005 118,991 162,170 597 281,758 397,763 427,665 During the third quarter 2013, the Bank transferred $536.0 million of previously designated available-for-sale securities to a held-to-maturity designation at estimated fair value. The securities transferred had an unrealized net loss of $13.3 million at the time of transfer which continues to be reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet, net of subsequent amortization, which is being recognized over the life of the securities. The carrying value of the held-to-maturity investment securities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands): Amortized cost Net loss on date of transfer from available-for-sale Accretion of unrealized loss on securities reclassified to held-to-maturity Carrying value December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ 607,833 $ (13,347) 4,205 598,691 $ 405,361 (13,347) 2,799 394,813 Realized gains on the sale of securities were $75,000, $0, and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There was a realized loss of $87,000 during 2016. There were no realized losses during 2015 and 2014 on the sale of securities. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2016 by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. At December 31, 2016, corporate debt securities with an amortized cost and estimated fair value of $60.5 million and $54.6 million, respectively, were callable prior to the maturity date. December 31, 2016 Less than one year Due after one year through five years Due after five years through ten years Due after ten years Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value $ $ 10,419 $ 60,974 20,379 56,942 148,714 $ 10,423 60,400 19,829 51,051 141,703 Other investments consist of mutual funds that do not have a contractual maturity date and are excluded from the table above. Mortgage-backed securities are excluded from the above table since their effective lives are expected to be shorter than the contractual maturity date due to principal prepayments. 70 The estimated fair value of securities pledged as required security for deposits and for other purposes required by law amounted to $506.0 million and $317.9 million, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The estimated fair value of securities pledged as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements amounted to $67.5 million and $83.2 million, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The estimated fair value and unrealized loss for securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, segregated by the duration of the unrealized loss, are as follows (in thousands): Available-for-sale: Investment securities: U.S. government & agency obligations Held-to-maturity: Investment securities: State and municipal obligations Corporate debt securities Other investments Total investment securities Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA GNMA Total mortgage backed securities Total held-to- maturity Total securities Less than 12 months As of December 31, 2016 12 months or longer Total Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses $ 12,224 $ (318) $ — $ — $ 12,224 $ (318) 32,995 12,450 8,551 (856) (120) (228) — 49,119 — — (5,881) — 32,995 61,569 8,551 (856) (6,001) (228) 53,996 (1,204) 49,119 (5,881) 103,115 (7,085) 102,461 124,403 79,116 (1,665) (2,185) (364) 26,898 8,925 — (792) (339) — 129,359 133,328 79,116 (2,457) (2,524) (364) 305,980 (4,214) 35,823 (1,131) 341,803 (5,345) 359,976 (5,418) 84,942 (7,012) 444,918 $ 372,200 $ (5,736) $ 84,942 $ (7,012) $ 457,142 $ (12,430) (12,748) 71 As of December 31, 2015 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value Unrealized Losses (continued) Available-for-sale: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations $ 14,937 $ (27) $ — $ — $ 14,937 $ (27) Held-to-maturity: Investment securities: U.S. agency obligations State and municipal obligations Corporate debt securities Total investment securities Mortgage-backed securities: FHLMC FNMA Total mortgage-backed securities Total held-to- maturity Total securities 30,175 2,857 — 33,032 35,816 44,004 79,820 (43) (2) — (45) (200) (434) (634) 5,023 639 46,473 (16) (1) (8,527) 35,198 3,496 46,473 (59) (3) (8,527) 52,135 (8,544) 85,167 (8,589) 53,604 23,318 (1,289) (689) 89,420 67,322 (1,489) (1,123) 76,922 (1,978) 156,742 (2,612) 112,852 (679) 129,057 (10,522) 241,909 $ 127,789 $ (706) $ 129,057 $ (10,522) $ 256,846 $ (11,201) (11,228) At December 31, 2016, the amortized cost, estimated fair value and credit rating of the individual corporate debt securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than one year are as follows (in thousands): Security Description BankAmerica Capital Chase Capital Wells Fargo Capital Huntington Capital Keycorp Capital PNC Capital State Street Capital SunTrust Capital As of December 31, 2016 Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value $ 15,000 $ 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 13,525 9,050 4,488 4,150 4,400 4,600 4,600 4,306 $ 55,000 $ 49,119 Credit Rating Moody’s/ S&P Ba1/BB+ Baa2/BBB- A1/BBB+ Baa2/BB Baa2/BB+ Baa1/BBB- A3/BBB Not Rated/BB+ At December 31, 2016, the estimated fair value of each of the above corporate debt securities was below cost. However, the total estimated fair value of the corporate debt securities has steadily increased over the past several years. These corporate debt securities are issued by other financial institutions with credit ratings ranging from a high of A1 to a low of BB as rated by one of the internationally-recognized credit rating services. These floating-rate securities were purchased in 1998 and have paid coupon interest continuously since issuance. Floating-rate debt securities such as these pay a fixed interest rate spread over 90-day LIBOR. Following the purchase of these securities, the required credit spread increased for these types of securities causing a decline in the market price. The Company concluded that unrealized losses on corporate debt securities were only temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016. In concluding that the impairments were only temporary, the Company considered several factors in its analysis. The Company noted that each issuer made all the contractually due payments when required. There were no defaults on principal or interest payments and no interest payments were deferred. All of the financial institutions were also considered well- capitalized. Credit spreads have now decreased for these types of securities and market prices have improved. Based on management’s analysis of each individual security, the issuers appear to have the ability to meet debt service requirements over 72 the life of the security. Furthermore, the Company does not have the intent to sell these corporate debt securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities. The Company has held the securities continuously since 1998 and expects to receive its full principal at maturity in 2028 or prior if called by the issuer. Historically, the Company has not utilized security sales as a source of liquidity. The Company’s long range liquidity plans indicate adequate sources of liquidity outside the securities portfolio. The mortgage-backed securities are issued and guaranteed by either the FHLMC, FNMA , GNMA, or SBA corporations which are chartered by the United States government and whose debt obligations are typically rated AA+ by one of the internationally- recognized credit rating services. The Company considers the unrealized losses to be the result of changes in interest rates which over time can have both a positive or negative impact on the estimated fair value of the mortgage-backed securities. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost. As a result, the Company concluded that these securities were only temporarily impaired at December 31, 2016. Note 5: Loans Receivable, Net A summary of loans receivable at December 31, 2016 and 2015 follows (in thousands): Commercial: Commercial and industrial Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Total commercial Consumer: Residential mortgage Residential construction Home equity loans and lines Other consumer Total consumer Purchased credit impaired ("PCI") loans Total loans Loans in Process Deferred origination costs, net Allowance for loan losses Loans receivable, net December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ $ 152,569 534,214 1,132,075 1,818,858 1,647,154 65,319 288,991 1,564 2,003,028 3,821,886 7,575 3,829,461 (14,249) 3,414 (15,183) 3,803,443 $ 144,538 307,509 510,725 962,772 791,249 50,757 192,368 792 1,035,166 1,997,938 461 1,998,399 (14,206) 3,232 (16,722) 1,970,703 The Bank’s eligible mortgage loans are pledged to secure FHLB advances. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, loans in the amount of $13.6 million, $18.3 million, and $18.3 million, respectively, were three or more months delinquent or in the process of foreclosure. The Company was not accruing interest income on these loans and has reversed previously accrued interest. There were no loans ninety days or greater past due and still accruing interest. Non- accrual loans include both smaller balance homogenous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. The recorded investment in mortgage and consumer loans collateralized by residential real estate which are in the process of foreclosure amounted to $3.7 million at December 31, 2016. The amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the Company was $1.7 million at December 31, 2016. The Company defines an impaired loan as all non-accrual commercial real estate, multi-family, land, construction and commercial and industrial loans in excess of $250,000. Impaired loans also include all loans modified as troubled debt restructurings. At December 31, 2016, the impaired loan portfolio totaled $31.0 million, for which there was a specific allocation in the allowance for loan losses of $510,000. At December 31, 2015, the impaired loan portfolio totaled $38.4 million, for which there was a specific allocation in the allowance for loan losses of $1.3 million. The average balance of impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $38.4 million, $41.5 million, and $41.0 million, respectively. If interest income on non-accrual loans and impaired loans had been current in accordance with their original terms, approximately $391,000, $848,000, and $1.6 million of interest income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, would have been recorded. 73 At December 31, 2016, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans are in non-accrual status. An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands): Balance at beginning of year Provision charged to operations Charge-offs Recoveries Balance at end of year Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ $ 16,722 2,623 (4,490) 328 15,183 $ $ 16,317 1,275 (1,135) 265 16,722 $ $ 20,930 2,630 (7,827) 584 16,317 74 The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 excluding PCI loans (in thousands): Residential Real Estate Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate - Investor Consumer Commercial and Industrial Unallocated Total For the year ended December 31, 2016 Allowance for loan losses: Balance at beginning of year $ 6,590 $ 2,292 $ 4,873 $ 1,095 $ 1,639 $ 233 $ 16,722 Provision (benefit) charged to operations Charge-offs Recoveries Balance at end of year For the year ended December 31, 2015 Allowance for loan losses: Balance at beginning of year Provision (benefit) charged to operations Charge-offs Recoveries $ $ (3,858) (558) 71 2,210 (1,509) 6 3,200 (1,890) 178 310 (349) 54 563 (184) 19 198 — — 2,623 (4,490) 328 2,245 $ 2,999 $ 6,361 $ 1,110 $ 2,037 $ 431 $ 15,183 4,291 $ 3,627 $ 5,308 $ 1,146 $ 863 $ 1,082 $ 16,317 2,465 (295) 129 (1,335) — — (361) (103) 29 529 (678) 98 826 (59) 9 (849) — — 1,275 (1,135) 265 Balance at end of year $ 6,590 $ 2,292 $ 4,873 $ 1,095 $ 1,639 $ 233 $ 16,722 December 31, 2016 Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributed to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Total ending allowance balance Loans: Loans individually evaluated for impairment Loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ $ $ 266 $ — $ 119 $ 125 $ — $ — $ 510 1,979 2,999 6,242 985 2,037 2,245 $ 2,999 $ 6,361 $ 1,110 $ 2,037 $ 431 431 $ 14,673 15,183 13,306 $ 11,123 $ 3,789 $ 2,556 $ 268 $ — $ 31,042 1,699,167 523,091 1,128,286 287,999 152,301 — 3,790,844 Total ending loan balance $ 1,712,473 $ 534,214 $ 1,132,075 $ 290,555 $ 152,569 $ — $ 3,821,886 December 31, 2015 Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributed to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Total ending allowance balance Loans: Loans individually evaluated for impairment Loans collectively evaluated for impairment Total ending loan balance $ $ $ $ 31 $ 544 $ 287 $ 43 $ 434 $ — $ 1,339 6,559 1,748 4,586 1,052 1,205 6,590 $ 2,292 $ 4,873 $ 1,095 $ 1,639 $ 233 233 $ 15,383 16,722 13,165 $ 18,964 $ 2,686 $ 2,307 $ 1,250 $ — $ 38,372 828,841 288,545 508,039 190,853 143,288 — 1,959,566 842,006 $ 307,509 $ 510,725 $ 193,160 $ 144,538 $ — $ 1,997,938 75 A summary of impaired loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): Impaired loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses Impaired loans with allocated allowance for loan losses Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated December 31, 2016 2015 25,228 5,814 31,042 510 $ $ $ 35,177 3,195 38,372 1,339 $ $ $ At December 31, 2016, impaired loans include troubled debt restructuring loans of $30.5 million, of which $27.0 million were performing in accordance with their restructured terms and were accruing interest. At December 31, 2015 impaired loans include troubled debt restructuring loans of $31.3 million, of which $26.3 million were performing in accordance with their restructured terms and were accruing interest. The summary of loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan portfolio segment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 follows, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): Unpaid Principal Balance Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated As of December 31, 2016 With no related allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial With an allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial As of December 31, 2015 With no related allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial With an allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial 9,848 $ 9,694 $ 11,886 2,239 2,559 300 26,832 3,998 — 2,011 581 — $ $ 11,123 1,897 2,246 268 25,228 3,612 — 1,892 310 — $ $ 6,590 $ 5,814 $ Unpaid Principal Balance Recorded Investment Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated 13,431 $ 13,056 $ 18,742 498 2,577 703 35,951 109 276 2,171 81 547 $ $ 18,688 466 2,264 703 35,177 109 276 2,220 43 547 $ $ — — — — — — 266 — 119 125 — 510 — — — — — — 31 544 287 43 434 3,184 $ 3,195 $ 1,339 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 76 With no related allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial With an allowance recorded: Residential real estate Commercial real estate Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial (continued) For the years ended December 31, 2016 2015 Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized $ $ $ $ 14,497 18,095 535 2,549 411 36,087 786 466 1,027 67 — 2,346 $ $ $ $ 394 467 98 122 13 1,094 163 — 79 29 — 271 $ $ $ $ 12,844 15,931 397 2,183 705 32,060 110 990 7,966 42 365 9,473 $ $ $ $ 585 451 11 123 8 1,178 3 1 9 2 2 17 The following table presents the recorded investment in non-accrual loans by loan portfolio segment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial December 31, 2016 2015 8,126 2,414 521 2,064 441 13,566 $ $ 5,779 7,684 3,112 1,576 123 18,274 $ $ The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 by loan portfolio segment, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): December 31, 2016 Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial December 31, 2015 Residential real estate Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Commercial and industrial 30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due Greater than 90 Days Past Due Total Past Due Loans Not Past Due Total $ $ $ $ 9,532 3,962 — 1,519 5,548 20,561 4,075 80 217 1,661 8 6,041 $ $ $ $ 3,038 1,032 — 436 181 4,687 2,716 — 1,208 115 — 4,039 $ $ $ $ 7,159 890 521 1,963 384 10,917 3,168 7,684 2,649 1,248 360 15,109 $ $ $ $ 19,729 5,884 521 3,918 6,113 36,165 9,959 7,764 4,074 3,024 368 25,189 $1,692,744 528,330 1,131,554 286,637 146,456 $3,785,721 $ 832,047 299,745 506,651 190,136 144,170 $1,972,749 $1,712,473 534,214 1,132,075 290,555 152,569 $3,821,886 $ 842,006 307,509 510,725 193,160 144,538 $1,997,938 77 The Company categorizes all commercial and commercial real estate loans, except for small business loans, into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings: Pass: Loans classified as Pass are well protected by the paying capacity and net worth of the borrower. Special Mention: Loans classified as Special Mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Substandard: Loans classified as Substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful: Loans classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by loan portfolio segment is as follows, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): December 31, 2016 Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Commercial and industrial December 31, 2015 Commercial real estate - owner occupied Commercial real estate - investor Commercial and industrial Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total $ $ $ $ 501,652 1,106,747 150,474 1,758,873 288,701 494,664 142,387 925,752 $ $ $ $ 7,680 713 757 9,150 1,803 10,267 787 12,857 $ $ $ $ 24,882 24,615 1,338 50,835 17,005 5,794 1,364 24,163 $ $ $ $ — $ — — — $ — $ — — — $ 534,214 1,132,075 152,569 1,818,858 307,509 510,725 144,538 962,772 For residential and consumer loan classes, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans based on payment activity as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, excluding PCI loans (in thousands): December 31, 2016 Performing Non-performing December 31, 2015 Performing Non-performing Residential Real Estate Residential Consumer $ $ $ $ 1,704,347 8,126 1,712,473 836,227 5,779 842,006 $ $ $ $ 288,491 2,064 290,555 191,584 1,576 193,160 The Company classifies certain loans as troubled debt restructurings ("TDR") when credit terms to a borrower in financial difficulty are modified. The modifications may include a reduction in rate, an extension in term, the capitalization of past due amounts and/or the restructuring of scheduled principal payments. One-to-four family and consumer loans where the borrower’s debt is discharged in a bankruptcy filing are also considered troubled debt restructurings. For these loans, the Bank retains its security interest in the real estate collateral. Included in the non-accrual loan total at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $3.5 million, $4.9 million, and $2.0 million, respectively, of troubled debt restructurings. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company has allocated $510,000, $262,000, and $419,000, respectively, of specific reserves to loans which 78 are classified as troubled debt restructurings. Non-accrual loans which become troubled debt restructurings are generally returned to accrual status after six months of performance. In addition to the troubled debt restructurings included in non-accrual loans, the Company also has loans classified as troubled debt restructuring which are accruing at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 which totaled $27.0 million, $26.3 million, and $21.5 million, respectively. Troubled debt restructurings are considered in the allowance for loan losses similar to other impaired loans. The following table presents information about troubled debt restructurings which occurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and troubled debt restructurings modified within the previous year and which defaulted during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands): Year ended December 31, 2016 Residential real estate Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Which Subsequently Defaulted: Year ended December 31, 2015 Residential real estate Commercial real estate - investor Consumer Which Subsequently Defaulted: Number of Loans 7 1 8 Number of Loans None Number of Loans 5 4 9 Number of Loans None Pre-modification Recorded Investment Post-modification Recorded Investment $ $ $ $ 1,574 1,592 852 Recorded Investment None Pre-modification Recorded Investment 2,029 6,095 599 Recorded Investment None 1,523 1,592 846 Post-modification Recorded Investment 1,966 6,007 547 As part of the Ocean Shore, Cape, and Colonial American acquisitions, PCI loans were acquired at a discount primarily due to deteriorated credit quality. PCI loans are accounted for at fair value, based upon the present value of expected future cash flows, with no related allowance for loan losses. The following table presents information regarding the estimates of the contractually required payments, the cash flows expected to be collected and the estimated fair value of the PCI loans acquired from Ocean Shore at December 1, 2016, Cape at May 2, 2016, and Colonial American at July 31, 2015 (in thousands): Ocean Shore December 1, 2016 7,385 $ Cape May 2, 2016 Colonial American July 31, 2015 21,345 $ 3,263 (12,387) 8,958 (576) 8,382 $ (1,854) 1,409 (109) 1,300 $ $ (4,666) 2,719 (401) 2,318 Contractually required principal and interest Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (non- accretable discount) Expected cash flows to be collected at acquisition Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield) Fair value of acquired loans $ 79 The following table summarizes the changes in accretable yield for PCI loans during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): Beginning balance Acquisition Accretion Reclassification from non-accretable difference Ending balance Note 6: Interest and Dividends Receivable For the years ended December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ 75 977 (459) 156 749 $ $ — 91 (16) — 75 A summary of interest and dividends receivable at December 31, 2016 and 2015 follows (in thousands): Loans Investment securities Mortgage-backed securities December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ 10,499 582 908 11,989 $ $ 4,844 442 574 5,860 Note 7: Premises and Equipment, Net Premises and equipment at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are summarized as follows (in thousands): Land Buildings and improvements Leasehold improvements Furniture and equipment Automobiles Construction in progress Total Accumulated depreciation and amortization December 31, 2016 2015 $ $ 19,080 63,955 6,598 33,375 824 2,416 126,248 (54,863) 71,385 $ $ 5,124 29,241 6,338 27,770 628 430 69,531 (41,112) 28,419 Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 amounted to $4.8 million, $3.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively. 80 Note 8: Deposits Deposits, including accrued interest payable of $31,000 at both December 31, 2016 and 2015, are summarized as follows (in thousands): Non-interest-bearing accounts Interest-bearing checking accounts Money market deposit accounts Savings accounts Time deposits Total deposits December 31, 2016 2015 $ Amount 782,504 1,626,713 458,911 672,519 647,103 Weighted Average Cost —% $ 0.19% 0.30% 0.08% 1.14% Amount 337,143 859,927 153,196 310,989 255,423 $ 4,187,750 0.30% $ 1,916,678 Weighted Average Cost —% 0.12% 0.23% 0.03% 1.39% 0.26% Included in time deposits at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is $269.0 million and $119.6 million in deposits of $100,000 and over. Time deposits at December 31, 2016 mature as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter $ $ 374,455 108,320 73,428 45,029 40,719 5,152 647,103 Interest expense on deposits for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands): Interest-bearing checking accounts Money market deposit accounts Savings accounts Time deposits Note 9: Borrowed Funds Borrowed funds are summarized as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ $ 2,114 858 191 4,354 7,517 $ $ 952 187 102 3,060 4,301 $ $ 925 92 112 2,974 4,103 Federal Home Loan Bank advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Other borrowings December 31, 2016 2015 Amount 250,498 69,935 56,559 376,992 $ $ Weighted Average Rate 1.75% $ 0.13 4.21 1.81% $ Amount 324,385 75,872 22,500 422,757 Weighted Average Rate 1.41% 0.14 2.00 1.21% Information concerning FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“reverse repurchase agreements”) is summarized as follows (in thousands): 81 Average balance Maximum amount outstanding at any month end Average interest rate for the year Amortized cost of collateral: Mortgage-backed securities Estimated fair value of collateral: Mortgage-backed securities FHLB Advances Reverse Repurchase Agreements $ 2016 266,981 252,229 $ 2015 253,843 352,624 $ 1.67% 1.52% 2016 2015 75,227 81,738 $ 0.14% 73,029 77,803 0.14% — — — $ 67,224 $ 79,483 — 67,452 83,233 The securities collateralizing the reverse repurchase agreements are delivered to the lender with whom each transaction is executed or to a third-party custodian. The lender, who may sell, loan or otherwise dispose of such securities to other parties in the normal course of their operations, agrees to resell to the Company substantially the same securities at the maturity of the reverse repurchase agreements. (See note 4) FHLB advances and reverse repurchase agreements have contractual maturities at December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FHLB Advances Reverse Repurchase Agreements $ $ 1,922 66,958 81,618 75,000 25,000 250,498 $ $ 69,935 — — — — 69,935 During September 2016, the Company issued $35.0 million of subordinated notes, which carry a fixed rate of 5.125% for the first five years and a floating rate of 392 basis points over 3-month LIBOR for the subsequent five years. Accrued interest is payable semi-annually and principal is due at maturity on September 30, 2026. During 2007, the Company issued $10.0 million of trust preferred securities which carry a floating rate of 175 basis points over 3-month LIBOR adjusted quarterly. Accrued interest is due quarterly with principal due at the maturity date of September 1, 2037. During 2006, the Company issued $12.5 million of trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities carry a floating rate of 166 basis points over 3-month LIBOR adjusted quarterly. Accrued interest is due quarterly with principal due at the maturity date in 2036. Interest expense on borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands): Federal Home Loan Bank advances Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Other borrowings Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ $ 4,471 102 1,073 5,646 $ $ 3,850 103 780 4,733 $ $ 2,515 78 809 3,402 All FHLB advances are secured by the Bank’s mortgage loans and FHLB stock. As a member of the FHLB of New York, the Bank is required to maintain a minimum investment in the capital stock of the FHLB, at cost, in an amount equal to 0.20% of the Bank’s mortgage-related assets, plus 4.5% of the specified value of certain transactions between the Bank and the FHLB. 82 Note 10: Income Taxes The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 consists of the following (in thousands): Current: Federal State Total current Deferred: Federal State Total deferred Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ $ 6,259 96 6,355 5,798 — 5,798 12,153 $ $ 8,378 1,064 9,442 1,349 92 1,441 10,883 $ $ 9,525 1,004 10,529 9 73 82 10,611 Included in other comprehensive income is income tax expense (benefit) attributable to net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the year in the amount of $423,000, $600,000, and $(338,000) for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in stockholders’ equity is income tax benefit (expense) attributable to stock plans in the amount of $62,000, $32,000, and $51,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected amount computed by multiplying income before the provision for income taxes times the applicable statutory Federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands): Income before provision for income taxes Applicable statutory Federal income tax rate Computed “expected” Federal income tax expense Increase (decrease) in Federal income tax expense resulting from: Tax exempt interest ESOP fair market value adjustment ESOP dividends Earnings on BOLI Merger related expenses State income taxes net of Federal benefit Other items, net Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 $ $ 35,199 35.0% 12,320 $ $ 31,205 35.0% 10,922 $ $ 30,531 35.0% 10,686 (390) 131 (223) (781) 1,005 62 29 (291) 111 (234) (525) 132 751 17 $ 12,153 $ 10,883 $ (109) 99 (229) (517) — 695 (14) 10,611 83 The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are presented in the following table (in thousands): December 31, 2016 2015 Deferred tax assets: Allowance for loan losses Reserve for repurchased loans Reserve for uncollected interest Incentive compensation Deferred compensation Other reserves Stock plans ESOP Fair value adjustments related to acquisition Net operating loss carryforward related to acquisition Other real estate owned Unrealized loss on securities Federal alternative minimum tax State alternative minimum tax Total gross deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities: Excess servicing on sale of mortgage loans Investments, discount accretion Deferred loan and commitment costs, net Premises and equipment, differences in depreciation Undistributed REIT income Total gross deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets $ $ $ 6,269 346 70 1,695 1,549 375 2,151 224 16,905 5,829 26 5,118 1,060 1,160 42,777 (76) (434) (1,261) (52) (2,167) (3,990) 38,787 $ 6,847 403 382 1,245 644 95 1,894 198 508 2,177 128 4,311 — 1,160 19,992 (99) (444) (1,224) (237) (1,181) (3,185) 16,807 The 2016 deferred tax expense does not equal the change in net deferred tax assets as a result of deferred taxes recorded in connection with the Cape and Ocean Shore acquisitions of $26.6 million. The Company has Federal Net Operating Losses from the acquisitions of Colonial and Cape. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the net operating losses from Colonial were $5.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively. These net operating losses are subject to annual limitation under Code Section 382 in the amount of approximately $330,000 and will expire between 2029 and 2034. As of December 31, 2016, the net operating losses from Cape were $10.8 million. These net operating losses are subject to annual limitation under Code Section 382 of approximately $4.5 million, and will expire between 2020-2023. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had $1.8 million of New Jersey AMA Tax Credits. These credits do not expire. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $1.0 million of AMT Tax Credits that were part of the Cape acquisition. These credits are subject to the same Code Section 382 limitation as indicated above but do not expire. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company determined that it is not required to establish a valuation reserve for the remaining net deferred tax assets since it is “more likely than not” that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income and tax planning strategies. The conclusion that it is “more likely than not” that the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized is based on the history of earnings and the prospects for continued growth. Management will continue to review the tax criteria related to the recognition of deferred tax assets. Retained earnings at December 31, 2016 includes approximately $10.8 million for which no provision for income tax has been made. This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only. Events that would result in taxation of these reserves include failure to qualify as a bank for tax purposes, distributions in complete or partial liquidation, stock redemptions and excess distributions to stockholders. At December 31, 2016, the Company had an unrecognized deferred tax liability of $4.4 million with respect to this reserve. 84 There were no unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The tax years that remain subject to examination by the Federal government include the year ended December 31, 2013 and forward. The tax years that remain subject to examination by the States of New Jersey and New York include the years ended December 31, 2012 and forward. Note 11: Employee Stock Ownership Plan As part of its mutual to stock conversion, the Bank established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan and in 2006 the Bank established a Matching Contribution Employee Stock Ownership Plan (collectively the “ESOP”) to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees. Effective December 31, 2015, the Matching Contribution Employee Stock Ownership Plan was terminated and merged into the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. All full-time employees are eligible to participate in the ESOP after they attain age 21 and complete one year of service during which they work at least 1000 hours. ESOP shares are allocated among participants on the basis of compensation earned during the year. Employees are fully vested in their ESOP account after the completion of five years of credited service or completely if service was terminated due to death, retirement, disability or change in control of the Company. ESOP participants are entitled to receive distributions from the ESOP account only upon termination of service, which includes retirement and death except that a participant may elect to have dividends distributed as a cash payment on a quarterly basis. The ESOP originally borrowed $13.4 million from the Company to purchase 2,013,137 shares of common stock issued in the conversion. On May 12, 1998, the initial loan agreement was amended to allow the ESOP to borrow an additional $8.2 million in order to fund the purchase of 633,750 shares of common stock. At the same time the term of the loan was extended from the initial twelve years to thirty years. As part of the establishment of the Matching Contribution Employee Stock Ownership Plan the term of the loan was reduced by one year and now expires in 2026. The amended loan is to be repaid from contributions by the Bank to the ESOP trust. The Bank is required to make contributions to the ESOP in amounts at least equal to the principal and interest requirement of the debt, assuming a fixed interest rate of 8.25%. The Bank’s obligation to make such contributions is reduced to the extent of any dividends paid by the Company on unallocated shares and any investment earnings realized on such dividends. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, contributions to the ESOP, which were used to fund principal and interest payments on the ESOP debt, totaled $507,000 and $510,000, respectively. During 2016 and 2015, $194,000 and $204,000, respectively, of dividends paid on unallocated ESOP shares were used for debt service. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the loan had an outstanding balance of $3.3 million and $3.5 million, respectively, and the ESOP had unallocated shares of 327,362 and 360,995, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the unallocated shares had a fair value of $9.8 million. The unamortized balance of the ESOP is shown as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP and is reflected as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Bank recorded compensation expense related to the ESOP of $657,000, $603,000, and $570,000, respectively, including $373,000, $318,000, and $284,000, respectively, representing additional compensation expense to reflect the increase in the average fair value of committed to be released and allocated shares in excess of the Bank’s cost. As of December 31, 2016, 2,285,891 shares had been allocated to participants and 33,634 shares were committed to be released. Note 12: Incentive Plan On April 20, 2006, the OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the granting of stock options or awards of common stock, was approved by stockholders. On May 5, 2011, the OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which also authorizes the granting of stock options or awards of common stock, was approved by stockholders. The purpose of these plans is to attract and retain qualified personnel in key positions, provide officers, employees and non-employee directors (“Outside Directors”) with a proprietary interest in the Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company, align the interests of management with those of other stockholders and reward employees for outstanding performance. All officers, other employees and Outside Directors of the Company and its affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the plans. Under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to an additional 2,400,000 shares subject to option or, in lieu of options, up to 960,000 shares in the form of stock awards. At December 31, 2016, 653,815 options or 261,526 awards remain to be issued. Under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to an additional 1,000,000 shares subject to options, or in lieu of options, up to 333,333 shares in the form of stock awards. At December 31, 2016, no options or awards remain to be issued. As part of the Colonial American acquisition, 370,000 options were granted in 2015 for the conversion of Colonial American outstanding options. These options had a weighted average exercise price of $26.11 and were fully vested upon acquisition. As part of the Cape acquisition, 599,373 options were granted in 2016 for the conversion of outstanding Cape options. These options had a weighted average exercise price of $10.34 per option and were fully vested upon acquisition. As part of the Ocean Shore acquisition, 287,595 options were granted in 2016 for the conversion of outstanding Ocean Shore options. These options had a 85 weighted average exercise price of $9.37 per option and were fully vested upon acquisition. The Company will not recognize compensation expense in the future on these options as they have been accounted for as part of the acquisition. All options expire 10 years from the date of grant and generally vest at the rate of 20% per year. The exercise price of each option equals the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The Company typically issues Treasury shares to satisfy stock option exercises. The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value of stock options and other stock-based compensation issued to employees in the income statement. The modified prospective transition method was adopted and, as a result, the income statement includes $829,000, $783,000, and $657,000, of expense for stock option grants for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $1.9 million in compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized. This cost will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of 3.1 years. The fair value of stock options granted by the Company was estimated through the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model applying the following assumptions: Risk-free interest rate Expected option life Expected volatility Expected dividend yield 2016 2015 2014 1.69% 7 years 21% 3.01% 1.72% 7 years 28% 2.99% 2.29% 7 years 29% 2.71% Weighted average fair value of an option share granted during the year $ 2.64 $ Intrinsic value of options exercised during the year (in thousands) 3,412 $ 3.58 136 4.17 131 The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate with a term equal to the expected option life. The expected option life conforms to the Company’s actual experience. Expected volatility is based on actual historical results. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight line basis over the vesting period. A summary of option activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 follows: Outstanding at beginning of year Granted Assumed in acquisition Exercised Forfeited Expired Outstanding at end of year Options exercisable 2016 2015 2014 Weighted Average Exercise Price 17.62 17.27 10.30 13.20 16.37 25.02 14.94 Number of Shares 2,281,931 317,460 886,968 (375,576) (11,625) (340,325) 2,758,833 1,912,630 $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Price 15.94 17.39 26.11 13.43 14.56 25.31 17.62 Number Of Shares 1,751,270 238,305 370,000 (29,480) (8,900) (39,264) 2,281,931 1,497,960 $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Price 16.47 17.72 — 12.66 13.30 22.44 15.94 Number Of Shares 1,740,580 280,375 — (27,634) (7,751) (234,300) 1,751,270 1,003,075 $ $ 86 The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016: Exercise Prices $ 8.44 to 9.98 10.00 to 12.28 12.40 to 14.62 16.06 to 18.45 20.25 to 22.17 27.34 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Number of Options 453,681 362,835 732,125 975,482 89,710 145,000 2,758,833 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life 3.4 years 4.0 5.3 7.3 0.1 5.3 5.3 years Weighted Average Exercise Price $ $ 9.20 10.84 14.02 17.35 21.69 27.34 14.94 Number Of Options 453,681 361,861 576,275 298,353 89,710 132,750 1,912,630 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life 3.4 years 4.0 5.1 4.6 0.1 5.0 4.2 years Weighted Average Exercise Price 9.20 10.84 13.98 17.23 21.69 27.34 14.05 $ $ The aggregate intrinsic value for stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at December 31, 2016 is $41.6 million and $30.6 million, respectively. A summary of the granted but unvested stock award activity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 follows: Outstanding at beginning of year: Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at end of year 2016 2015 2014 Number of Shares 126,960 $ 66,770 (33,651) (3,134) 156,945 $ Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number Of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 16.90 17.66 16.31 16.54 17.25 81,775 $ 70,890 (23,587) (2,118) 126,960 $ 15.85 17.39 14.86 15.16 16.90 59,962 $ 40,380 (16,438) (2,129) 81,775 $ 13.84 17.70 13.31 14.18 15.85 Note 13: Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to financial instruments and commitments which involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. These financial instruments and commitments include unused consumer lines of credit and commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2016, the following commitments and contingent liabilities existed which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands): Unused consumer and construction loan lines of credit (primarily floating-rate) Unused commercial loan lines of credit (primarily floating-rate) Other commitments to extend credit: $ Fixed-Rate Adjustable-Rate Floating-Rate December 31, 2016 197,784 297,813 101,749 7,776 22,161 The Company’s fixed-rate loan commitments expire within 90 days of issuance and carried interest rates ranging from 3.00% to 5.54% at December 31, 2016. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments and commitments is represented by the contractual amounts. The Company uses the same credit policies in granting commitments and conditional obligations as it does for financial instruments recorded in the consolidated statements of financial condition. These commitments and obligations do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s assessment of risk. Substantially all of the unused consumer and construction loan lines of credit are collateralized by mortgages on real estate. 87 At December 31, 2016, the Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases for premises and equipment. Rental expense under these leases aggregated approximately $3.1 million, $2.3 million, and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The projected minimum rental commitments as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter $ $ 2,423 2,293 2,099 2,087 1,932 9,410 20,244 The Company grants one-to-four family and commercial first mortgage real estate loans to borrowers primarily located in Central and Southern New Jersey. The ability of borrowers to repay their obligations is dependent upon various factors including the borrowers’ income and net worth, cash flows generated by the underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral and priority of the Company’s lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the Company’s control; the Company is, therefore, subject to risk of loss. A decline in real estate values could cause some residential and commercial mortgage loans to become inadequately collateralized, which would expose the Bank to a greater risk of loss. The Company believes its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks. Collateral and/or guarantees are required for all loans. The Company is a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Management and its legal counsel are of the opinion that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Note 14: Earnings Per Share The following reconciles average shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): Weighted average shares outstanding Less: Unallocated ESOP shares Unallocated Incentive award shares and shares held by deferred compensation plan Average basic shares outstanding Add: Effect of dilutive securities: Incentive awards and shares held by deferred compensation plan Average diluted shares outstanding December 31, 2016 2015 2014 23,481 (344) (44) 23,093 433 23,526 17,037 (378) (59) 16,600 211 16,811 17,197 (412) (98) 16,687 110 16,797 For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 882,000, 926,000, and 767,000, respectively, of antidilutive stock options were excluded from earnings per share calculations. Note 15: Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair market measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or the most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets 88 and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact. The Company uses valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present value amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement costs). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, a fair value hierarchy has been established for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Movements within the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the end of the applicable reporting period. There were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The fair value hierarchy is as follows: Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlations or other means. Level 3 Inputs – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Securities Available-for-Sale Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value. Fair value for these securities, all of which are U. S. agency obligations, is determined using a quoted price in an active market or exchange (Level 1) or estimated by using inputs other than quoted prices that are based on market observable information (Level 2). Level 2 securities are priced through third-party pricing services or security industry sources that actively participate in the buying and selling of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities. 89 Other Real Estate Owned and Impaired Loans Other real estate owned and loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral are recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs of 15%. Fair value is based on independent appraisals. The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands): December 31, 2016 Items measured on a recurring basis: Investment securities available-for-sale: U.S. agency obligations Items measured on a non-recurring basis: Other real estate owned Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral December 31, 2015 Items measured on a recurring basis: Investment securities available-for-sale: U.S. agency obligations Items measured on a non-recurring basis: Other real estate owned Loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral Assets and Liabilities Disclosed at Fair Value Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: Total Fair Value Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs $ 12,224 $ — $ 12,224 $ — 9,803 2,419 — — — — 9,803 2,419 Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: Total Fair Value Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs $ 29,902 $ — $ 29,902 $ — 8,827 4,344 — — — — 8,827 4,344 A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy is set forth below. Cash and Due from Banks For cash and due from banks, the carrying amount approximates fair value. Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost, as the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. The Company determines the fair value of the securities utilizing Level 1, Level 2 and, infrequently, Level 3 inputs. In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. Most of the Company’s investment and mortgage-backed securities, however, are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are bought and sold in active markets. Prices for these instruments are obtained through third-party pricing vendors or security industry sources that actively participate in the buying and selling of securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities. Fair value estimates are made at a point in time, based on relevant market data as well as the best information available about the security. Illiquid credit markets have resulted in inactive markets for certain of the Company’s securities. As a result, there is limited observable market data for these assets. Fair value estimates for securities for which limited observable market data is available are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, liquidity discounts, credit and interest rate risks, and other factors. These estimates involve significant uncertainties and judgments and cannot be determined with precision. As a result, such calculated fair value estimates may not be realizable in a current sale or immediate settlement of the security. The Company utilizes third-party pricing services to obtain fair values for most of its securities held-to-maturity. Management’s policy is to obtain and review all available documentation from the third-party pricing service relating to their fair value 90 determinations, including their methodology and summary of inputs. Management reviews this documentation, makes inquiries of the third-party pricing service and makes a determination as to the level of the valuation inputs. Based on the Company’s review of the available documentation from the third-party pricing service, management concluded that Level 2 inputs were utilized for all securities except for certain state and municipal obligations known as bond anticipation notes (“BANs”) where management utilized Level 3 inputs. In the case of the Level 2 securities, the significant observable inputs include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, other market information and observations of equity and credit default swap curves related to the issuer. Management based its fair value estimate of the BANs on the local nature of the issuing entities, the short-term life of the security and current economic conditions. Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is its carrying value since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed. There is no active market for this stock and the Company is required to maintain a minimum investment based upon the outstanding balance of mortgage related assets and outstanding borrowings. Loans Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage, construction, consumer and commercial. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. Fair value of performing and non-performing loans was estimated by discounting the future cash flows, net of estimated prepayments, at a rate for which similar loans would be originated to new borrowers with similar terms. Fair values estimated in this manner do not fully incorporate an exit price approach to fair value, but instead are based on a comparison to current market rates for comparable loans. Deposits Other than Time Deposits The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and interest-bearing checking accounts and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand. The related insensitivity of the majority of these deposits to interest rate changes creates a significant inherent value which is not reflected in the fair value reported. Time Deposits The fair value of time deposits are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase with Retail Customers Fair value approximates the carrying amount as these borrowings are payable on demand and the interest rate adjusts monthly. Borrowed Funds Fair value estimates are based on discounting contractual cash flows using rates which approximate the rates offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities. 91 The book value and estimated fair value of the Bank’s significant financial instruments not recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are presented in the following tables (in thousands): December 31, 2016 Financial Assets: Cash and due from banks Securities held-to-maturity Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Loans receivable and mortgage loans held-for-sale Financial Liabilities: Deposits other than time deposits Time deposits Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with retail customers Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings December 31, 2015 Financial Assets: Cash and due from banks Securities held-to-maturity Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock Loans receivable and mortgage loans held-for-sale Financial Liabilities: Deposits other than time deposits Time deposits Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with retail customers Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings Limitations Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: Book Value Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs $ 301,373 $ 301,373 $ — $ 598,691 19,313 3,804,994 3,540,647 647,103 8,550 586,504 — — — — — — 3,540,647 644,354 69,935 69,935 — 307,057 — 304,901 — 3,030 19,313 3,834,677 — — — — Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: Book Value Level 1 Inputs Level 2 Inputs Level 3 Inputs $ 43,946 $ 43,946 $ — $ 394,813 19,978 1,973,400 1,661,255 255,423 — — — — — 397,763 — — 1,661,255 255,564 75,872 75,872 — 346,885 — 346,118 — — 19,978 1,986,891 — — — — Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because a limited market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other significant unobservable inputs. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include premises and equipment, Bank-Owned Life Insurance, deferred tax assets and goodwill. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates. 92 Note 16: Parent-Only Financial Information The following condensed statements of financial condition at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (parent company only) reflects the Company’s investment in its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, using the equity method of accounting. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (in thousands) Assets: Cash and due from banks Advances to subsidiary Bank Investment securities ESOP loan receivable Investment in subsidiary Bank Other assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity: Borrowings Other liabilities Stockholders' equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands) December 31, 2016 2015 9,100 12,358 1,000 3,285 602,274 3,657 631,674 56,398 3,238 572,038 631,674 $ $ $ $ 7 16,196 1,000 3,503 239,486 866 261,058 22,500 112 238,446 261,058 $ $ $ $ Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 Dividend income – subsidiary Bank $ 4,000 $ 16,000 $ Interest and dividend income – investment securities Net gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale Interest income – advances to subsidiary Bank Interest income – ESOP loan receivable Total income Interest expense – borrowings Operating expenses Income before income taxes and undistributed earnings of subsidiary Bank Benefit for income taxes Income before undistributed earnings of subsidiary Bank Undistributed earnings of subsidiary Bank Net Income 62 — 118 322 4,502 1,049 1,697 1,756 780 2,536 20,510 3 — 51 306 16,360 736 1,452 14,172 634 14,806 5,516 $ 23,046 $ 20,322 $ 16,000 279 1,031 44 322 17,676 767 1,365 15,544 229 15,773 4,147 19,920 93 CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Cash flows from operating activities: Net income Decrease (increase) in advances to subsidiary Bank Undistributed earnings of subsidiary Bank Net (gain) on sales of investment securities available for sale Change in other assets and other liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale Purchase of investment securities Repayments on ESOP loan receivable Cash consideration for acquisition, net of cash received Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Net proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes Repayment of borrowings Dividends paid Purchase of treasury stock Exercise of stock options Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Net increase in cash and due from banks Cash and due from banks at beginning of year Cash and due from banks at end of year $ $ Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014 23,046 3,838 (20,510) — (1,619) 4,755 — — 218 (19,274) (19,056) 33,899 — (12,616) (1,878) 3,989 23,394 9,093 7 9,100 $ $ 20,322 6,580 (5,516) — (707) 20,679 — (1,000) 204 (127) (923) — (5,000) (8,693) (6,459) 396 (19,756) — 7 7 $ $ 19,920 (6,023) (4,147) (1,031) 373 9,092 8,439 (651) 190 — 7,978 — — (8,241) (9,178) 349 (17,070) — 7 7 94 SELECTED CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (dollars in thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) 2016 Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loans losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Other income Operating expenses (excluding merger related expenses) Merger related expenses Income before provision for income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share 2015 Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loans losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Other income Operating expenses (excluding merger related expenses) Merger related expenses Income before provision for income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Dec. 31 Sept. 30 June 30 March 31 Quarters ended $ 39,904 $ 37,307 $ 33,141 $ 4,150 35,754 510 35,244 6,257 25,833 6,632 9,036 2,984 6,052 0.22 0.22 $ $ $ 3,372 33,935 888 33,047 5,896 23,715 1,311 13,917 4,789 9,128 0.36 0.35 $ $ $ 3,127 30,014 662 29,352 4,883 21,457 7,189 5,589 1,928 3,661 0.16 0.16 $ $ $ 23,073 2,514 20,559 563 19,996 3,376 15,313 1,402 6,657 2,452 4,205 0.25 0.25 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 June 30 March 31 20,168 2,035 18,133 375 17,758 3,985 13,687 50 8,006 2,745 5,261 0.32 0.31 23,149 $ 21,970 $ 20,576 $ 2,395 19,575 300 19,275 4,152 15,117 1,030 7,280 2,582 4,698 0.28 0.28 $ $ $ 2,143 18,433 300 18,133 4,171 14,208 184 7,912 2,779 5,133 0.31 0.31 $ $ $ 2,461 20,688 300 20,388 4,118 15,885 614 8,007 2,777 5,230 0.31 0.31 $ $ $ 95 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. (b) Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. This assessment was based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on those criteria. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on page 50. Item 9B. Other Information None 96 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III The information relating to directors, executive officers and corporate governance and the Registrant’s compliance with Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act required by Part III is incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2017 under the captions “Corporate Governance”, “Proposal 1. Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information relating to executive compensation required by Part III is incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2017 under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.” Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters required by Part III is incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2017 under the caption “Stock Ownership.” Information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans existing as of December 31, 2016 is as follows: Plan category Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders Total Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 2,758,833 $ — 2,758,833 14.94 — 14.94 653,815 — 653,815 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence The information relating to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence required by Part III is incorporated herein by reference from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2017 under the caption “Transactions with Management.” Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services The information relating to the principal accounting fees and services is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting to be held on June 2, 2017 under the caption “Proposal 3. Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.” 97 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV (a) (1) Financial Statements The following documents are filed as a part of this report: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 PAGE 49 51 52 53 54 55 57 (a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules All schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. (a) (3) Exhibits 3.1 3.2 4.0 10.1 10.1(a) 10.1(b) 10.1(c) 10.3 10.3(a) 10.4 10.4(a) 10.5 10.5(a) 10.8 10.15 10.16 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 10.21(a) 10.22 Certificate of Incorporation of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (1) Bylaws of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (20) Stock Certificate of OceanFirst Financial Corp. (1) Form of OceanFirst Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (1) Amendment to OceanFirst Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (2) Amended Employee Stock Ownership Plan (10) Form of Matching Contribution Employee Stock Ownership Plan (10) OceanFirst Bank 1995 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (1) OceanFirst Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Income Agreement (11) OceanFirst Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (1) OceanFirst Bank New Executive Deferred Compensation Master Agreement (11) OceanFirst Bank Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers (1) OceanFirst Bank New Director Deferred Compensation Master Agreement (11) Amended and Restated OceanFirst Financial Corp. 1997 Incentive Plan (3) Amendment of the OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2000 Stock Option Plan (4) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2000 Stock Option Plan Non-Statutory Option Award Agreement (6) Amendment and form of OceanFirst Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan (7) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp. Deferred Incentive Compensation Award Program (8) 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (9) Form of Employment Agreement between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and certain executive officers, including Michael J. Fitzpatrick. (10) Amendment to form of Employment Agreement between OceanFirst Financial Corp and certain executive officers, including Michael J. Fitzpatrick. (15) Form of Employment Agreement between OceanFirst Bank and certain executive officers, including Michael J. Fitzpatrick. (10) 98 10.23 10.23(a) 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.30A 10.31 10.31A 10.32 10.33 10.34 10.35 14.0 21.0 23.0 31.1 31.2 32.1 101.0 101.INS 101.SCH 101.CAL 101.LAB 101.PRE 101.DEF Form of Change in Control Agreement between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and certain executive officers, including Steven J. Tsimbinos (10) Amendment to form of Change in Control Agreement between OceanFirst Financial Corp. and certain executive officers, including Steven J. Tsimbinos (15) Form of Change in Control Agreement between OceanFirst Bank and certain executive officers, including Steven J. Tsimbinos (10) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan Award Agreement for Stock Options (13) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan Award Agreement for Stock Awards (13) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp. 2011 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan Award Agreement (13) 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (14) 2011 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan (14) Amended and restated Employment Agreement between Christopher D. Maher and OceanFirst Financial Corp. dated April 23, 2014 (16) Amendment No. 1 dated August 5, 2015 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Christopher D. Maher and OceanFirst Financial Corp. dated April 23, 2014 (21) Amended and restated Employment Agreement between Christopher D. Maher and OceanFirst Bank dated April 23, 2014 (16) Amendment No. 1 dated August 5, 2015 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Christopher D. Maher and OceanFirst Bank dated April 23, 2014 (21) Supplemental Executive Retirement Account Agreement between Christopher D. Maher and OceanFirst Bank dated June 18, 2013 (17) Letter Agreement between Craig C. Spengemen and OceanFirst Bank (18) Form of OceanFirst Financial Corp 2011 Stock Incentive Plan Award Agreement for Stock Awards (13) Form of Employment Agreement between OceanFirst Bank, OceanFirst Financial Corp., and certain executive officers, including Joseph R. Iantosca and Joseph J. Lebel (21) OceanFirst Financial Corp. Code of Ethics and Standards of Personal Conduct (5) Subsidiary information is incorporated herein by reference to “Part I – Subsidiary Activities” Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. XBRL Instance Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document 99 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form S-1, Registration Statement, effective May 13, 1996 as amended, Registration No. 33-80123. Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 25, 1997. Incorporated herein by reference from Schedule 14-A Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 19, 1998. Incorporated herein by reference from the Schedule 14-A Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 21, 2003. Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2004. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit to Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2005. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibits to Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2005. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibits to Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2006. Incorporated herein by reference from Schedule 14-A Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 14, 2006. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit to Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2008. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2008. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed January 20, 2009. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed May 10, 2011. Incorporated herein by reference from Schedule 14-A Revised Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 31, 2011. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on July 21, 2011. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed April 25, 2014. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed June 20, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed December 5, 2013. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2014. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2015. Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit to Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2015. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Not applicable. 100 CONFORMED SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. OCEANFIRST FINANCIAL CORP. By: /s/ Christopher D. Maher Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 6, 2017 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Name /s/ Christopher D. Maher Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) /s/ Michael J. Fitzpatrick Michael J. Fitzpatrick Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) /s/ Angela K. Ho Angela K. Ho (principal accounting officer) /s/ Steven E. Brady Steven E. Brady Director /s/ Joseph J. Burke Joseph J. Burke Director /s/ Angelo Catania Angelo Catania Director /s/ Michael D. Devlin Michael D. Devlin Director Date March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 101 Name /s/ Jack M. Farris Jack M. Farris Director /s/ John R. Garbarino John R. Garbarino Director /s/ Dorothy F. McCrosson Dorothy F. McCrosson Director /s/ Donald E. McLaughlin Donald E. McLaughlin Director /s/ Diane F. Rhine Diane F. Rhine Director /s/ Mark G. Solow Mark G. Solow Director /s/ John E. Walsh John E. Walsh Director /s/ Samuel R. Young Samuel R. Young Director Date March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 March 6, 2017 102 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Exhibit 23 The Board of Directors OceanFirst Financial Corp.: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-215270; No. 333-215269; No. 333-177243; and No. 333-141746) on Form S-8, in registration statements (No. 333-213307; and No. 333-209590) on Form S-4, as amended by Post-Effective Amendments No. 1 on Form S-8, and in registration statement (No. 333-213487) on Form S-3 of OceanFirst Financial Corp., of our reports dated March 15, 2017 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which reports are incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K of OceanFirst Financial Corp. /s/ KPMG LLP Short Hills, New Jersey March 15, 2017 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Christopher D. Maher, certify that: Exhibit 31.1 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2017 /s/ Christopher D. Maher Christopher D. Maher Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael J. Fitzpatrick certify that: Exhibit 31.2 1. 2. 3. 4. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary; Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. b. c. d. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. b. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Fitzpatrick Michael J. Fitzpatrick Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 32.1 In connection with the Annual Report of OceanFirst Financial Corp. and subsidiary (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. 2. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. /s/ Christopher D. Maher Christopher D. Maher Chief Executive Officer March 15, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Fitzpatrick Michael J. Fitzpatrick Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2017 OceanFirst Bank OFFicers ExEcutivE OfficErs Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board President Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Fitzpatrick Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer Joseph R. Iantosca Executive Vice President Chief Administrative Officer Joseph J. Lebel III Executive Vice President Chief Banking Officer Steven J. Tsimbinos Executive Vice President General Counsel Corporate Secretary first sEniOr vicE PrEsidEnts Vincent M. D’Alessandro President, Southern Region George Destafney President, Central Region Gary S. Hett Human Resources David R. Howard Direct Banking Margaret M. Lanning Chief Credit Officer sEniOr vicE PrEsidEnts Thomas A. Ando Commercial Lending Nina Anuario Business Development Debra A. Bassinder BSA & Security Michelle J. Berry Residential Lending Janet M. Bossi Residential Lending S. Joseph Casella Commercial Lending Sharon L. Danielson Deposit Operations Craig Degenova Commercial Lending Michael DellaBarca Commercial Credit Administration Bradley J. Fouss Commercial Lending Steven L. Pellegrinelli Commercial Lending Edward J. Geletka Business Development Louis Petrini Commercial Lending Anthony Giordano Senior Operations Officer Charles L. Pinto Retail Banking Mark A. Harhigh Commercial Credit Administration Michele E. Hart Associate General Counsel, Legal Jill Apito Hewitt Investor Relations & Corporate Communications Angela K. Ho Principal Accounting Officer Gayle S. Hoffman Chief Risk Officer Sean D. Kauffman Commercial Lending Kenneth L. Keller Commercial Lending Joseph A. LaDuca Controller Cara M. Larned Marketing Robert A. Laskowski Treasurer Raymond C. Leahy Commercial Lending Stacy S. Mattia Commercial Lending Nancy L. Mazza Retail Banking Scott McLaughlin Commercial Credit Administration Michael C.K. Moorhead Commercial Credit Administration Edward K. Moran Commercial Lending Donald Morgenweck Accounting Veronica Morey Retail Banking Rachel M. O’Keefe Wealth Management Operations Michele A. Powelczyk Commercial Credit Administration James M. Smith Commercial Lending Noel M. Spear Real Estate Operations Craig C. Spengeman Wealth Management Mark A. Tasy Retail Banking Suzanne L. Wegryn Commercial Credit Administration David A. Williams Information Technology vicE PrEsidEnts Enid Z. Agosto Robert W. Baechler Linda L. Blakaitis Shannan Boyd Elaine G. Boyko Robert A. Brennan Dawn Brodton Vicki Buczynski Kevin Burns Brian R. Challender Tricia Ciliberto Catherine Colobert Mark Conners Francine S. Crudo Lynda Dayton Jeffrey Decesare Keryn J. Dettlinger Lauren Dezzi Catherine Farley Patricia Ferry Edward Fitzpatrick Jill G. Flynn Sharon M. Franklin Michael L. Frankovich Gregory Fuller Erin K. Garrabrant Philip M. Gogarty Matthew Grant Christine R. Gray Stephen H. Haak Nancy Haig Matthew Haines Angela Hickman Jonas L. Homa Denise A. Horner Jean G. Jacobson Brandon C. Kaletkowski Robert L. Kilgour Theresa A. Killian David Krause Patricia A. Laird Lana L. Latella Brett Lawrence Eleni D. Lemoniotis Frederick Lopez Kevin J. Madgey Jodi Magazzu Donna Mason Bernard M. McCue Marc A. Mosco Jeffrey J. Muller Elizabeth A. Nugent Rita E. Permuko Vernise L. Petrolito Cheryl A. Pivola Maureen A. Purcell Karen N. Rack Catherine R. Rollo Jeffrey Ropiecki Kenneth L. Rosshirt Rebecca Rothstein Frank A. Scarpone Christine L. Schiess Jonathan R. Seidel Michael C. Serafino Patricia M. Siciliano Alicia F. Smith Robert Sobkow Kellie M. Spawton Anne D. Sutherland Sharon L. Taggart Theresa Trainum Lois A. Velardo James O. Waters Trevor A. Watson Christin A. Wiggins Margaret M. Williams Lynn Wingender Christopher S. Wolf Barbara A. Wright Wendy L. Wright Patricia A. Zilly AssistAnt vicE PrEsidEnts Kristen M. Acacia Issan Acosta Elizabeth M. Alexander Carmela Bonsera Jennifer L. Bottomly Linda A. Calderon Vicki Cannizzaro Patrick M. Carrano Lisa A. Chandler Kimberlie L. Cooper-Truitt Krysten Costa Scott H. Courtney Lori A. Cozzino Richard J. Cunningham Carol A. Daniels Matthew A. Dietrich Eileen Dipasquale Jennifer L. Eng Kellyanne Facenda Karen L. Farrell Mary Fischer Catherine A. Galli Lee Ann Gant Patricia Germano Dennis W. Gilbert Brenda Gleeson Diane M. Haake Debra M. Hall James F. Haller Heather Hays Michelle Hellick Donna L. Hollenback Jennifer W. Ingenito Tracy H. Jenkins Jane L. Jensen Keshia E. Jones Andre H. Jordan Arnold L. Juliano Pradeep Kamdar Christopher Kent Volha Kislaya Karen Larned Christine M. Marciano Sara E. Martinez Sally A. Matics Patricia A. McGrath Jackie McIlvaine David N. Mowder Dominick A. Mucchiello Marc T. Mugler John R. Murray Stefanie A. Nolan Cathyann O’Connell Marifrances O’Neill Susan Paz-Cubberley William L. Peace Katherine A. Pongracz William D. Powell Cynthia A. Presti Leon H. Riggins Jennifer L.D. Rivera Kimberly Robinson Kathleen G. Roche Kimberlee Rubba Kathleen Scardilli Michael J. Segeren Rosemarie Sherman Tia M. Smith Melissa A. Southard Melissa Sterling Debra K. Townsend Susan Turner Christopher Venturi Christina Vespertino Stephanie Villari Maureen Webb Nancy L. Wescoat Terri V. Wesley AssistAnt sEcrEtAriEs Laurel A. Fluet Mary Beth Hennessy Janet Verdura Karen A. Willis BOard OF directOrs Steven E. Brady Retired Ocean Shore Holding Co. Joseph J. Burke, CPA Retired KPMG LLP Angelo Catania Retired Homestar Services, LLC Michael D. Devlin Retired Cape Bancorp, Inc. Jack M. Farris Vice President and Deputy General Counsel InfoSec & Cybersecurity for Verizon Communications, Inc. John R. Garbarino Retired OceanFirst Financial Corp. Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer Dorothy F. McCrosson, Esq. Managing Partner McCrosson & Stanton, P.C. Donald E. McLaughlin, CPA Retired Diane F. Rhine Broker Sales Representative Childers Sotheby’s International Realty Mark G. Solow Retired GarMark Advisors, LLC John E. Walsh Senior Vice President T and M Associates, Inc. Samuel R. Young President and CEO Tilton Fitness Management directOrs emeritus John W. Chadwick Thomas F. Curtin Robert E. Knemoller James T. Snyder Corporate InformatIon OceanFirst Financial cOrp. OceanFirst Bank OceanFirst Financial cOrp. cOrpOrate OFFicers Christopher D. Maher Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Fitzpatrick Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer Steven J. Tsimbinos Executive Vice President General Counsel Corporate Secretary Jill Apito Hewitt Senior Vice President Investor Relations Officer Robert A. Laskowski Senior Vice President Treasurer Linda L. Blakaitis Vice President Assistant Corporate Secretary sharehOlder inFOrmatiOn administrative OFFices 975 Hooper Avenue Toms River, NJ 08754-2009 (732) 240-4500 www.oceanfirst.com annual meeting OF sharehOlders The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on June 2, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. at Navesink Country Club, 50 Luffburrow Lane, Middletown, New Jersey. investOr relatiOns Copies of the Company’s earnings releases and financial publica- tions, including the annual report on Form 10-K (without exhibits) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are available without charge by contacting: Jill Apito Hewitt, Senior Vice President, Extension 7516 or investorrelations@oceanfirst.com stOck transFer and registrar Shareholders wishing to change the name, address or ownership of stock, to report lost certificates or to consolidate accounts are asked to contact the Company’s stock registrar and transfer agent directly: American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. Shareholder Relations Department 59 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038 (800) 937-5449 independent registered puBlic accOunting Firm KPMG LLP 51 John F. Kennedy Parkway Short Hills, NJ 07078 OceanFirst Financial Corp. 975 Hooper Avenue Toms River, NJ 08754-2009 732-240-4500 www.oceanfirst.com NASDAQ: OCFC Member FDIC • Equal Housing Lender • Equal Opportunity Lender EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNI TY 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above