Quarterlytics / Industrials / Industrial - Machinery / Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

pkoh · NASDAQ Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker pkoh
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Industrials
Industry Industrial - Machinery
Employees 6300
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2017 Annual Report

To Our Fellow Shareholders:

ParkOhio is preparing for higher annual revenues and increaassed earninngs per 
share in 2018. ParkOhio has a great future behind it.

Edward F. Crawford
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(cid:94)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:286)(cid:381)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:393)(cid:393)(cid:346)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:336)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:374)

(cid:94)(cid:94)(cid:258)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:271)(cid:455)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:94)(cid:94)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:336)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)

(cid:1005)(cid:1081)

(cid:1012)(cid:1081)

(cid:1011)(cid:1081)

(cid:1005)(cid:1004)(cid:1081)

(cid:1013)(cid:1081)

(cid:1010)(cid:1009)(cid:1081)

(cid:936)(cid:1012)(cid:936)(cid:1012)(cid:936)(cid:1012)(cid:936)(cid:1012)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1009)(cid:936)(cid:1009)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1007)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1005)(cid:936)(cid:1005)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1004)

Unnited Sttateatess

AsiAsiaa

EurEuropopee

CaCanada

MexMe icoo

OtOthere

(cid:1006)(cid:1007)(cid:1081)

(cid:1007)(cid:1011)(cid:1081)

(cid:1008)(cid:1004)(cid:1081)

SSupSupSu plyplyyyy TecTeTeTeTececTTTeT hnohnologloglo iesie

Assssssssssembemememememblyly ComComponents

EEEngEngEn ineneereeredd Proroducd ts

(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:18)(cid:258)(cid:258)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:346)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:449)(cid:449)(cid:449)(cid:449)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:75)(cid:75)(cid:393)(cid:393)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:374)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:400)
(cid:894)(cid:349)(cid:894)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:374) (cid:373)(cid:349)(cid:373)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:895)(cid:895)(cid:895)

(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936)(cid:1011)(cid:936) (cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)(cid:1007)

(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:936)(cid:1010)(cid:1004)(cid:1004)

(cid:936)(cid:1009)(cid:936)(cid:1009)(cid:1008)

(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:1009)(cid:1009)(cid:1009)(cid:1009)

(cid:936)(cid:1008)(cid:936) (cid:1011)

(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1007)

(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1008)

(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1009)

(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1010)

(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1011)

2017 FORM 10-K

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
Í ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

or
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
to

For the transition period from

Commission file number: 000-03134

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio

34-1867219

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio

(Address of principal executive offices)

44124

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (440) 947-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, Par Value $1.00 Per Share

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is a successor issuer to Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No Í
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the

Act. Yes ‘ No Í

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Í No ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive

Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes Í No ‘

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated
by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Í

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

‘

Non-accelerated filer

‘ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for

complying with any new or revised financial accountings standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ‘

Í

‘

‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ‘ Yes Í No
Aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: Approximately $319,540,000 based on

the closing price of $38.10 per share of the registrant’s Common Stock on June 30, 2017.

Number of shares outstanding of registrant’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, as of February 28, 2018: 12,538,751.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or

about May 10, 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.

PART I.

1.

1A.

1B.

2.

3.

4.

Business

Risk Factors

Unresolved Staff Comments

Properties

Legal Proceedings

Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II.

5.

6.

7.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases

of Equity Securities

Selected Financial Data

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

8.

9.

9A.

9B.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Controls and Procedures

Other Information

PART III

10.

11.

12

13.

14.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Executive Compensation

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

Matters

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PART IV.

15.

16.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Form 10-K Summary

Signatures

Page

2

8

16

16

18

19

20

21

22

37

38

74

74

74

75

75

75

75

75

76

78

79

1

Part I

Item 1. Business

Overview

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (“Holdings” or “ParkOhio”), incorporated in Ohio since 1998, is a diversified
international company providing world-class customers with a supply chain management outsourcing service,
capital equipment used on their production lines, and manufactured components used to assemble their products.

References herein to “we” or “the Company” include, where applicable, Holdings and Park-Ohio Industries,

Inc. and Holdings’ other direct and indirect subsidiaries.

The Company operates through three reportable segments: Supply Technologies, Assembly Components

and Engineered Products. As of December 31, 2017, we employed approximately 6,100 people. Further
discussion of and financial information for these segments, including net sales, operating income, assets, capital
expenditures and depreciation and amortization, is contained in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2

The following table summarizes the key attributes of each of our business segments:

Supply Technologies

Assembly Components

Engineered Products

NET SALES FOR 2017

$561.8 million

SELECTED PRODUCTS

Sourcing, planning and
procurement of over
245,000 production
components, including:
• Fasteners
• Pins
• Valves
• Hoses
• Wire harnesses
• Clamps and fittings
• Rubber and plastic
components

• Other Class C and MRO

$326.6 million

• Induction heating and
melting systems
• Pipe threading systems
• Industrial oven systems
• Forging presses
• Forged steel and

machined products

$524.5 million

• Control arms
• Knuckles
• Injection and

compression molded
rubber products
• Turbo charging hose
• Turbo coolant hose
• Rubber and

thermoplastic hose

• Oil pans
• Flywheel spacers
• Fuel filler assemblies
• Gasoline direct injection

SELECTED INDUSTRIES

SERVED

products

systems

• Automotive and light

• Ferrous and non-ferrous

vehicle

• Agricultural equipment
• Construction equipment
• Heavy-duty truck
• Marine equipment

metals
• Coatings
• Forging
• Foundry
• Heavy-duty truck
• Construction equipment
• Automotive
• Oil and gas
• Rail
• Aerospace and defense

• Heavy-duty truck
• Power sports and

recreational equipment
• Aerospace and defense
• Semiconductor
equipment

• Electrical distribution

and controls

• Consumer electronics
• Bus and coaches
• Automotive
• Agricultural and

construction equipment

• HVAC
• Lawn and garden
• Plumbing
• Medical

The Company consists of the following segments:

Supply Technologies

Our Supply Technologies business provides our customers with Total Supply Management™, a proactive
solutions approach that manages the efficiencies of every aspect of supplying production parts and materials to
our customers’ manufacturing floor, from strategic planning to program implementation. Total Supply
Management™ includes such services as engineering and design support, part usage and cost analysis, supplier
selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of-use delivery,
electronic billing services and ongoing technical support. We operate 64 logistics service centers in the
United States, Mexico, Canada, Czech Republic, Puerto Rico, Scotland, Hungary, China, Taiwan, Singapore,
India, England, France, Spain, Poland, Northern Ireland and Ireland, as well as production sourcing and support
centers in Asia. Through our supply chain management programs, we supply more than 245,000 globally-sourced
production components, many of which are specialized and customized to meet individual customers’ needs.

3

Total Supply Management™ provides our customers with an expert partner in strategic planning, global
sourcing, technical services, parts and materials, logistics, distribution and inventory management of production
components. Some production components are characterized by low per unit supplier prices relative to the
indirect costs of supplier management, quality assurance, inventory management and delivery to the production
line. In addition, Supply Technologies delivers an increasingly broad range of higher-value production
components including valves, fuel hose assemblies, electro-mechanical hardware, labels, fittings, steering
components and many others. Applications engineering specialists and the direct sales force work closely with
the engineering staff of OEM customers to recommend the appropriate production components for a new product
or to suggest alternative components that reduce overall production costs, streamline assembly or enhance the
appearance or performance of the end product. As an additional service, Supply Technologies also provides spare
parts and aftermarket products to end users of its customers’ products.

Total Supply Management™ services are typically provided to customers pursuant to sole-source

arrangements. We believe our services distinguish us from traditional buy/sell distributors, as well as
manufacturers who supply products directly to customers, because we provide the supply chain management of
our customers’ high-volume production components. We administer the processes customized to each customer’s
needs by replacing numerous current suppliers with a sole-source relationship with Supply Technologies. Our
highly-developed, customized information systems provide global transparency and flexibility through the
complete supply chain. This enables our customers to: (1) significantly reduce the direct and indirect cost of
production component processes by outsourcing internal purchasing, quality assurance and inventory fulfillment
responsibilities; (2) reduce the amount of working capital invested in inventory and floor space; (3) reduce
component costs through purchasing efficiencies, including bulk buying and supplier consolidation; and
(4) receive technical expertise in production component selection, design and engineering. Our sole-source
arrangements foster long-term, entrenched supply relationships with our customers and, as a result, the average
tenure of service for our top 50 Supply Technologies clients exceeds ten years. Supply Technologies’ remaining
sales are generated through the wholesale supply of industrial products to other manufacturers and distributors
pursuant to master or authorized distributor relationships.

The Supply Technologies segment also engineers and manufactures precision cold formed and cold

extruded fasteners and other products, including locknuts, SPAC® nuts and wheel hardware, which are
principally used in applications where controlled tightening is required due to high vibration. Supply
Technologies produces both standard items and specialty products to customer specifications, which are used in
large volumes by customers in the automotive, heavy-duty truck and rail industries.

In 2017, Supply Technologies completed the strategic acquisitions of Heads and All Threads (“HAT”) and

Aero-Missile Components Inc. (“AMC”). These acquisitions strengthen our market position for supply chain
management services in key end markets worldwide, including aerospace and construction.

Markets and Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017, approximately 70% of Supply

Technologies’ net sales were to domestic customers. Remaining sales were primarily to manufacturing facilities
of large, multinational customers located in Canada, Mexico, Europe and Asia. Total Supply Management™
services and production components are used extensively in a variety of industries, and demand is generally
related to the state of the economy and to the overall level of manufacturing activity.

Supply Technologies markets and sells its services to over 8,700 customers domestically and

internationally. The five largest customers, to which Supply Technologies sells through sole-source contracts to
multiple operating divisions or locations, accounted for approximately 35% of the sales of Supply Technologies
in 2017 and 2016. The loss of any two or more of its top five customers could have a material adverse effect on
the results of operations and financial condition of this segment.

Competition. A limited number of companies compete with Supply Technologies to provide supply

management services for production parts and materials. Supply Technologies competes primarily on the basis of

4

its Total Supply Management™ services, including engineering and design support, part usage and cost analysis,
supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of-use
delivery, electronic billing services and ongoing technical support, and its geographic reach, extensive product
selection, price and reputation for high service levels. Numerous U.S. and foreign companies compete with
Supply Technologies in manufacturing cold-formed and cold-extruded products.

Assembly Components

Assembly Components manufactures products oriented towards fuel efficiency and reduced emission
standards. Assembly Components designs, develops and manufactures aluminum products and highly efficient,
high pressure Direct Fuel Injection fuel rails and pipes; fuel filler pipes that route fuel from the gas cap to the gas
tank; flexible multi-layer plastic and rubber assemblies used to transport fuel from the vehicle’s gas tank and
then, at extreme high pressure, to the engine’s fuel injector nozzles. These advanced products, coupled with
Turbo Enabled engines, make up large and growing engine architecture for all worldwide car manufacturers.
Assembly Components also designs and manufactures Turbo Charging hoses along with Turbo Coolant hoses
that will be required as engines get downsized to 3 or 4 cylinders from 6 or 8 cylinders. This engine downsizing
increases efficiency, while dramatically decreasing pollution levels. In addition, our Assembly Components
segment operates what we believe is one of the few aluminum component suppliers that have the capability to
provide a wide range of high-volume, high-quality products utilizing a broad range of processes including gravity
and low pressure permanent mold, die-cast and lost-foam, as well as emerging alternative casting technologies.
We also provide machining to our aluminum products customers.

At the end of December 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of an injection molding business.
The acquisition, which is included in our Assembly Components segment, is a manufacturer of precision-molded
rubber components for several industrial markets.

Assembly Components operates 25 manufacturing facilities and two technical offices in the United States,

Mexico, China and the Czech Republic. In addition, we also provide value-added services such as design
engineering, machining and parts assembly.

Markets and Customers. The five largest customers of Assembly Components accounted for approximately

45% of segment sales for 2017 and 2016. These sales, across multiple operating divisions, are through sole
source contracts. The loss of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the results of
operations and financial condition of this segment.

Competition. Assembly Components competes principally on the basis of its ability to: (1) engineer and
manufacture high-quality, cost-effective assemblies utilizing multiple technologies in large volumes; (2) provide
timely delivery; and (3) retain the manufacturing flexibility necessary to quickly adjust to the needs of its
customers. There are few domestic companies with the capabilities to meet customers’ stringent quality and
service standards and lean manufacturing techniques. As one of these suppliers, Assembly Components is well-
positioned to benefit as customers continue to consolidate their supplier base.

Engineered Products

Our Engineered Products segment operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design

and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered products, including induction heating and melting systems,
pipe threading systems and forged and machined products. We manufacture these products in 13 domestic
facilities throughout the United States and 22 international facilities in Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom,
Belgium, Germany, China, Italy, India, Japan, Spain and Brazil.

Our induction heating and melting business utilizes proprietary technology and specializes in the

engineering, construction, service and repair of induction heating and melting systems, primarily for the ferrous

5

and non-ferrous metals, silicon, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive and construction equipment industries.
Our induction heating and melting systems are engineered and built to customer specifications and are used
primarily for melting, heating, and surface hardening of metals and curing of coatings. Approximately 43% of
our induction heating and melting systems’ revenues are derived from the sale of replacement parts and provision
of field service, primarily for the installed base of our own products. Our pipe threading business serves the oil
and gas industry. We also engineer and install mechanical forging presses, sell spare parts and provide field
service for the large existing base of mechanical forging presses and hammers in North America. We machine,
induction harden and surface finish crankshafts and camshafts, used primarily in locomotives. We forge
aerospace and defense structural components such as landing gears and struts, as well as rail products such as
railcar center plates and draft lugs.

Markets and Customers. We sell induction heating and other capital equipment to component

manufacturers and OEMs in the ferrous and non-ferrous metals, silicon, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive,
truck, construction equipment and oil and gas industries. We sell forged and machined products to locomotive
manufacturers, machining companies and sub-assemblers who finish aerospace and defense products for OEMs,
and railcar builders and maintenance providers.

Competition. We compete with small-to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers

on the basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery performance and engineering
expertise. We compete domestically and internationally with small-to medium-sized forging and machining
businesses on the basis of product quality and precision.

Sales and Marketing

Supply Technologies markets its products and services in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Europe and

Asia primarily through its direct sales force, which is assisted by applications engineers who provide the
technical expertise necessary to assist the engineering staff of OEM customers in designing new products and
improving existing products. Assembly Components primarily markets and sells its products in North America
through internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. Engineered Products primarily markets
and sells its products in North America through both internal sales personnel and independent sales
representatives. Induction heating and pipe threading equipment is also marketed and sold in Europe, Asia, Latin
America and Africa through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. In some
instances, the internal engineering staff assists in the sales and marketing effort through joint design and
applications-engineering efforts with major customers.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

Supply Technologies purchases substantially all of its production components from third-party suppliers.

Supply Technologies has multiple sources of supply for its components. An increasing portion of Supply
Technologies’ production components are purchased from suppliers in foreign countries, primarily Canada,
Taiwan, China, South Korea, Singapore, India and multiple European countries. Supply Technologies is
dependent upon the ability of such suppliers to meet stringent quality and performance standards and to conform
to delivery schedules. Assembly Components and Engineered Products purchase substantially all of their raw
materials, principally metals and certain component parts incorporated into their products, from third-party
suppliers and manufacturers. Most raw materials required by Assembly Components and Engineered Products
are commodity products available from several domestic suppliers. Management believes that raw materials and
component parts other than certain specialty products are available from alternative sources.

Our suppliers of raw materials and component parts may significantly and quickly increase their prices in
response to increases in costs of the raw materials, such as steel, that they use to manufacture our raw materials
and component parts. While we generally attempt to pass along increased raw material prices to our customers in
the form of price increases, there may be a time delay between the increased raw material prices and our ability

6

to increase the price of our products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of our products due to various
factors. See the discussion of risks associated with raw material supply and costs in Item 1A “Risk Factors”.

Backlog

Management believes that backlog is not a meaningful measure for Supply Technologies, as a majority of
Supply Technologies’ customers require just-in-time delivery of production components. Management believes
that Assembly Components’ backlog is not a meaningful measure, as a significant portion of sales are on a
release or firm order basis. The backlog of Engineered Products’ orders believed to be firm as of December 31,
2017 was $173.2 million, compared with $137.6 million as of December 31, 2016. All of Engineered Products’
backlog as of December 31, 2017 is scheduled to be shipped in 2018.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations

We are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect public health
and the environment, particularly with regard to discharges and emissions, as well as handling, storage, treatment
and disposal of various substances and wastes. Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and
regulations and permit requirements could result in civil and criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions,
including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures.
Pursuant to certain environmental laws, owners or operators of facilities may be liable for the costs of response
or other corrective actions for contamination identified at or emanating from current or former locations, without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of any such contamination,
and for related damages to natural resources. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of
hazardous substances or materials may be liable for costs of response at sites where they are located, whether or
not the site is owned or operated by such person.

From time to time, we have incurred, and are presently incurring, costs and obligations for correcting
environmental noncompliance and remediating environmental conditions at certain of our properties. In general,
we have not experienced difficulty in complying with environmental laws in the past, and compliance with
environmental laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of
operations. Our capital expenditures on environmental control facilities were not material during the past five
years and such expenditures are not expected to be material to us in the foreseeable future.

We are currently, and may in the future be, required to incur costs relating to the investigation or
remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing
environmental conditions. For instance, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party
sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended,
or comparable state laws, which provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability.
We are participating in the cost of certain clean-up efforts at several of these sites. The availability of third-party
payments or insurance for environmental remediation activities is subject to risks associated with the willingness
and ability of the third party to make payments. However, our share of such costs has not been material and,
based on available information, we do not expect our exposure at any of these locations to have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

Information as to Segment Reporting and Geographic Areas

The information contained in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein
relating to (1) net sales, operating income, identifiable assets and other information by segment, and (2) net sales
and assets by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is included elsewhere
herein.

7

Available Information

We file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy

Statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public can obtain
copies of these materials by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549,
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330, or by accessing the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon
as reasonably practicable after such materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC, we make such materials available
on our website free of charge at http://www.pkoh.com. The information on our website is not a part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information with respect to our executive officers as of March 8, 2018, is as follows:

Name

Age

Position

Edward F. Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Matthew V. Crawford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 President and Chief Operating Officer and Director

Patrick W. Fogarty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Robert D. Vilsack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Secretary and General Counsel

Mr. E. Crawford has been a director and our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since
1992. He has also served as the Chairman of Crawford Group, Inc., a management company for a group of
manufacturing companies, since 1964.

Mr. M. Crawford has been President and Chief Operating Officer since 2003. Mr. M. Crawford became one
of our directors in August 1997 and has served as President of Crawford Group, Inc. since 1995. Mr. E. Crawford
is the father of Mr. M. Crawford.

Mr. Fogarty has been Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Fogarty was

Director of Corporate Development since 1997 and served as Director of Finance from 1995 to 1997.

Mr. Vilsack has been Secretary and General Counsel since joining us in 2002.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition. These risks are not the only ones we face. If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of
operations or financial condition could be adversely affected.

The industries in which we operate are cyclical and are affected by the economy in general.

We sell products to customers in industries that experience cyclicality (expectancy of recurring periods of
economic growth and slowdown) in demand for products and may experience substantial increases and decreases
in business volume throughout economic cycles. Industries we serve, including the automotive and vehicle parts,
heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, steel, rail, oil and gas, electrical distribution and controls, aerospace and
defense, recreational equipment, HVAC, electrical components, appliance and semiconductor equipment
industries, are affected by consumer spending, general economic conditions and the impact of international trade.
A downturn in any of the industries we serve could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
liquidity and results of operations.

8

Adverse credit market conditions may significantly affect our access to capital, cost of capital and ability to

meet liquidity needs.

Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the credit markets may adversely impact our ability to access credit
already arranged and the availability and cost of credit to us in the future. These market conditions may limit our
ability to replace, in a timely manner, maturing liabilities and access the capital necessary to grow and maintain
our business. Accordingly, we may be forced to delay raising capital or pay unattractive interest rates, which
could increase our interest expense, decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility.
Longer-term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased
regulation, reduced alternatives or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to
liquidity needed for our business. Any disruption could require us to take measures to conserve cash until the
markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements or other funding for our business needs can be arranged.
Such measures could include deferring capital expenditures and reducing or eliminating future share repurchases
or other discretionary uses of cash. Overall, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected by disruptions in the credit markets.

Adverse global economic conditions may have significant effects on our customers and suppliers that could

result in material adverse effects on our business and operating results.

Significant reductions in available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit, substantial

reductions and fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, volatility in commodity prices for such
items as crude oil, and concerns that the worldwide economy may enter into a prolonged recessionary period,
may materially adversely affect our customers’ access to capital or willingness to spend capital on our products
or their ability to pay for products that they will order or have already ordered from us. In addition, unfavorable
global economic conditions may materially adversely affect our suppliers’ access to capital and liquidity with
which they maintain their inventories, production levels and product quality, which could cause them to raise
prices or lower production levels.

These potential effects of adverse global economic conditions are difficult to forecast and mitigate. As a
consequence, our operating results for a particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, prior results are
not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing effects could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Adverse global economic conditions may have significant effects on our customers that would result in our

inability to borrow or to meet our debt service coverage ratio in our revolving credit facility.

As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with our debt service coverage ratio covenant and other
covenants contained in our revolving credit facility. While we expect to remain in compliance throughout 2018,
declines in demand in the automotive industry and in sales volumes could adversely impact our ability to remain
in compliance with certain of these financial covenants. Additionally, to the extent our customers are adversely
affected by a decline in the economy in general, they may not be able to pay their accounts payable to us on a
timely basis or at all, which would make the accounts receivable ineligible for purposes of the revolving credit
facility and could reduce our borrowing base and our ability to borrow.

Because a significant portion of our sales is to the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, a decrease
in the demand of these industries or the loss of any of our major customers in these industries could adversely
affect our financial health.

Demand for certain of our products is affected by, among other things, the relative strength or weakness of

the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries. The domestic automotive and heavy-duty truck industries are
highly cyclical and may be adversely affected by international competition. In addition, the automotive and
heavy-duty truck industries are significantly unionized and subject to work slowdowns and stoppages resulting
from labor disputes. We derived 42% and 7% of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2017 from the
automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, respectively.

9

The loss of a portion of business to any of our major automotive or heavy-duty truck customers could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flow and results of operations. We cannot assure you that
we will maintain or improve our relationships in these industries or that we will continue to supply these
customers at current levels.

Our Supply Technologies customers are generally not contractually obligated to purchase products and

services from us.

We supply products and services to our Supply Technologies customers generally under purchase orders as

opposed to long-term contracts. When we do enter into long-term contracts with our Supply Technologies
customers, many of them only establish pricing terms and do not obligate our customers to buy required
minimum amounts from us or to buy from us exclusively. Accordingly, many of our Supply Technologies
customers may decrease the amount of products and services that they purchase from us or even stop purchasing
from us altogether, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our net sales and profitability.

We are dependent on key customers.

We rely on several key customers. For the year ended December 31, 2017, our ten largest customers
accounted for approximately 32% of our net sales. Many of our customers place orders for products on an as-
needed basis and operate in cyclical industries and, as a result, their order levels have varied from period to
period in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Due to competitive issues, we have lost key customers
in the past and may again in the future. Customer orders are dependent upon their markets and may be subject to
delays or cancellations. As a result of dependence on our key customers, we could experience a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations if any of the following were to occur:

•
•
•
•

the loss of any key customer, in whole or in part;
the insolvency or bankruptcy of any key customer;
a declining market in which customers reduce orders or demand reduced prices; or
a strike or work stoppage at a key customer facility, which could affect both their suppliers and

customers.

If any of our key customers become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable

from that customer would be adversely affected and any payments we received in the preference period prior to a
bankruptcy filing may be potentially forfeitable, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

We operate in highly competitive industries.

The markets in which all three of our segments sell their products are highly competitive. Some of our
competitors are large companies that have greater financial resources than we have. We believe that the principal
competitive factors for our Supply Technologies segment are an approach reflecting long-term business
partnership and reliability, sourced product quality and conformity to customer specifications, timeliness of
delivery, price and design and engineering capabilities. We believe that the principal competitive factors for our
Assembly Components and Engineered Products segments are product quality and conformity to customer
specifications, design and engineering capabilities, product development, timeliness of delivery and price. The
rapidly evolving nature of the markets in which we compete may attract new entrants as they perceive
opportunities, and our competitors may foresee the course of market development more accurately than we do. In
addition, our competitors may develop products that are superior to our products or may adapt more quickly than
we do to new technologies or evolving customer requirements.

We expect competitive pressures in our markets to remain strong. These pressures arise from existing
competitors, other companies that may enter our existing or future markets and, in some cases, our customers,
which may decide to internally produce items we sell. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully with our competitors. Failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

10

The loss of key executives could adversely impact us.

Our success depends upon the efforts, abilities and expertise of our executive officers and other senior
managers, including Edward Crawford, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Matthew Crawford, our
President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as the president of each of our operating units. An event of default
occurs under our revolving credit facility if Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford or certain of their related
parties own in the aggregate less than 15% of Holdings’ outstanding common stock and, if at such time, neither
Mr. E. Crawford nor Mr. M. Crawford holds the office of chairman, chief executive officer or president. The loss
of the services of Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford, senior and executive officers, and/or other key
individuals could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

We may encounter difficulty in expanding our business through targeted acquisitions.

We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, targeted acquisition opportunities that we believe would

complement our business. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in consummating any acquisitions.

Any targeted acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions of
businesses. We may not successfully overcome these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with
any of our acquisitions, including the possible inability to integrate an acquired business’ operations, information
technology, services and products into our business; diversion of management’s attention; the assumption of
unknown liabilities; increases in our indebtedness; the failure to achieve the strategic objectives of those
acquisitions; and other unanticipated problems, some or all of which could materially and adversely affect us. The
process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, our activities. Any delays
or difficulties encountered in connection with any acquisition and the integration of our operations could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of our business.

Our Supply Technologies business depends upon third parties for substantially all of our component parts.

Our Supply Technologies business purchases substantially all of its component parts from third-party

suppliers and manufacturers. As such, it is subject to the risk of price fluctuations and periodic delays in the
delivery of component parts. Failure by suppliers to continue to supply us with these component parts on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on us. We depend upon the ability
of these suppliers, among other things, to meet stringent performance and quality specifications and to conform
to delivery schedules. Failure by third-party suppliers to comply with these and other requirements could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The raw materials used in our production processes and by our suppliers of component parts are subject to

price and supply fluctuations that could increase our costs of production and adversely affect our results of
operations.

Our supply of raw materials for our Assembly Components and Engineered Products businesses could be

interrupted for a variety of reasons, including availability and pricing. Prices for raw materials necessary for
production have fluctuated significantly in the past and significant increases could adversely affect our results of
operations and profit margins. While we generally attempt to pass along increased raw materials prices to our
customers in the form of price increases, there may be a time delay between the increased raw materials prices
and our ability to increase the price of our products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of our products
due to various factors.

Our suppliers of component parts, particularly in our Supply Technologies business, may significantly and
quickly increase their prices in response to increases in costs of the raw materials, such as steel, that they use to
manufacture our component parts. We may not be able to increase our prices commensurate with our increased
costs. Consequently, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

11

The energy costs involved in our production processes and transportation are subject to fluctuations that

are beyond our control and could significantly increase our costs of production.

Our manufacturing process and the transportation of raw materials, components and finished goods are
energy intensive. Our manufacturing processes are dependent on adequate supplies of electricity and natural gas.
A substantial increase in the cost of transportation fuel, natural gas or electricity could have a material adverse
effect on our margins. We may experience higher than anticipated gas costs in the future, which could adversely
affect our results of operations. In addition, a disruption or curtailment in supply could have a material adverse
effect on our production and sales levels.

Potential product liability risks exist from the products that we sell.

Our businesses expose us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture and
sale of our products and products of third-party vendors that we use or resell. While we currently maintain what
we believe to be suitable and adequate product liability insurance, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
maintain our insurance on acceptable terms or that our insurance will provide adequate protection against
potential liabilities. In the event of a claim against us, a lack of sufficient insurance coverage could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Moreover, even if we
maintain adequate insurance, any successful claim could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Some of our employees belong to labor unions, and strikes or work stoppages could adversely affect our

operations.

As of December 31, 2017, we were a party to seven collective bargaining agreements with various labor
unions that covered approximately 560 full-time employees. Our inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with
these unions could result in, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected
workers and increased operating costs as a result of higher wages or benefits paid to union members. If the
unionized workers were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, or other employees were to
become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations and higher ongoing labor costs,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate and source internationally, which exposes us to the risks of doing business abroad.

Our operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
limitations on ownership and on repatriation of earnings;
transportation delays and interruptions;
political, social and economic instability and disruptions;
potential disruption that could be caused by the partial or complete reconfiguration of the European

•
•
•
•
•
•

•

•
•
•

Union;

government embargoes or foreign trade restrictions;
the imposition of duties and tariffs and other trade barriers;
import and export controls;
labor unrest and current and changing regulatory environments;
the potential for nationalization of enterprises;
disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to U.S. laws and

regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”);

increasingly complex laws and regulations concerning privacy and data security, including the

European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation;
difficulties in staffing and managing multinational operations;
limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies; and
potentially adverse tax consequences.

12

We are also exposed to risks relating to U.S. policy with respect to companies doing business in foreign
jurisdictions, particularly in light of the current U.S. presidential administration. Legislation or other changes in
the U.S. tax laws could increase our U.S. income tax liability and adversely affect our after-tax profitability. In
addition, the current U.S. presidential administration has introduced greater uncertainty with respect to future tax,
trade regulations and trade agreements. Changes in tax policy, trade regulations or trade agreements, such as the
disallowance of tax deductions on imported merchandise or the imposition of new tariffs on imported products,
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery

laws. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their
intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining
business. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate in many parts of the world
that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance
with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. We cannot assure you that our internal
controls and procedures always will protect us from the reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or
agents. For example, in connection with responding to a subpoena from the staff of the SEC, regarding a third
party, we disclosed to the staff that the third party participated in a payment on our behalf to a foreign tax official
that implicates the FCPA. If we are found to be liable for FCPA violations (either due to our own acts or our
inadvertence or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or
other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Any of the events enumerated above could have an adverse effect on our operations in the future by
reducing the demand for our products and services, decreasing the prices at which we can sell our products or
otherwise having an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We cannot assure
you that we will continue to operate in compliance with applicable customs, currency exchange control
regulations, transfer pricing regulations or any other laws or regulations to which we may be subject. We also
cannot assure you that these laws will not be modified.

We are subject to significant environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and related compliance

expenditures and liabilities.

Our businesses are subject to many foreign, federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws

and regulations, particularly with respect to the use, handling, treatment, storage, discharge and disposal of
substances and hazardous wastes used or generated in our manufacturing processes. Compliance with these laws
and regulations is a significant factor in our business. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur
significant expenditures to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations. Our failure to comply
with applicable environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements could result in civil or criminal
fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing
operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of pollution control equipment or remedial actions.

We are currently, and may in the future be, required to incur costs relating to the investigation or
remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing
environmental conditions. Some environmental laws and regulations impose liability and responsibility on
present and former owners, operators or users of facilities and sites for contamination at such facilities and sites
without regard to causation or knowledge of contamination. In addition, we occasionally evaluate various
alternatives with respect to our facilities, including possible dispositions or closures. Investigations undertaken in
connection with these activities may lead to discoveries of contamination that must be remediated, and closures
of facilities may trigger compliance requirements that are not applicable to operating facilities. Consequently, we
cannot assure you that existing or future circumstances, the development of new facts or the failure of third
parties to address contamination at current or former facilities or properties will not require significant
expenditures by us.

13

We expect to continue to be subject to increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety laws and

regulations. It is difficult to predict the future interpretation and development of environmental and health and
safety laws and regulations or their impact on our future earnings and operations. We anticipate that compliance
will continue to require increased capital expenditures and operating costs. Any increase in these costs, or
unanticipated liabilities arising from, among other things, discovery of previously unknown conditions or more
aggressive enforcement actions, could adversely affect our results of operations, and there is no assurance that
they will not exceed our reserves or have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

If our information systems fail, our business could be materially affected.

We believe that our information systems are an integral part of the Supply Technologies segment and, to a

lesser extent, the Assembly Components and Engineered Products segments. We depend on our information
systems to process orders, manage inventory and accounts receivable collections, purchase products, maintain
cost-effective operations, route and re-route orders, maintain confidential and proprietary information and
provide superior service to our customers. These systems are subject to failure due to design flaws, improper use,
cyber intrusions and other electronic service breaches. We cannot assure you that a failure of or a disruption in
the operation of our information systems used by Supply Technologies, including the failure of the supply chain
management software to function properly, or those used by Assembly Components and Engineered Products,
will not occur. Any such failure or disruption could damage our relation with our customer in our industries or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Operating problems in our business may materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of

operations.

We are subject to the usual hazards associated with manufacturing and the related storage and transportation

of raw materials, products and waste, including explosions, fires, leaks, discharges, inclement weather, natural
disasters, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime and transportation interruption or calamities. The
occurrence of material operating problems at our facilities may have a material adverse effect on our operations
as a whole, both during and after the period of operational difficulties.

We have a significant amount of goodwill, and any future goodwill impairment charges could adversely

impact our results of operations.

As of December 31, 2017, we had goodwill of $100.2 million. The future occurrence of a potential indicator

of impairment, such as a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, unanticipated
competition, a material negative change in relationships with significant customers, strategic decisions made in
response to economic or competitive conditions, loss of key personnel or a more-likely-than-not expectation that
a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of, could result in goodwill
impairment charges, which could adversely impact our results of operations. We have recorded goodwill
impairment charges in the past, and such charges materially impacted our historical results of operations. For
additional information, see Note 4, Goodwill, to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

Our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer
collectively beneficially own a significant portion of Holdings’ outstanding common stock and their interests
may conflict with yours.

As of December 31, 2017, Edward Crawford, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and

Matthew Crawford, our President and Chief Operating Officer, collectively beneficially owned approximately
29% of Holdings’ common stock. Mr. E. Crawford is Mr. M. Crawford’s father. Their interests could conflict
with your interests. For example, if we encounter financial difficulties or are unable to pay our debts as they
mature, the interests of Messrs. E. Crawford and M. Crawford may conflict with your interests.

14

Our business and operating results may be adversely affected by natural disasters or other catastrophic

events beyond our control.

While we have taken precautions to prevent production and service interruptions at our global facilities,

severe weather conditions such as hurricanes or tornadoes, as well as major earthquakes and other natural
disasters, in areas in which we have manufacturing facilities or from which we obtain products may cause
physical damage to our properties, closure of one or more of our business facilities, lack of adequate work force
in a market, temporary disruption in the supply of inventory, disruption in the transport of products and utilities,
or delays in the delivery of products to our customers. Any of these factors may disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The insurance that we maintain may not fully cover all potential expenses.

We maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance, but such insurance may not cover all

risks associated with the hazards of our business and is subject to limitation, including deductible and maximum
liabilities covered. We are potentially at risk if one or more of our insurance carriers fail. Additionally, severe
disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some
insurers. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, and our premiums may increase
significantly on coverage that we maintain.

15

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2017, our operations included numerous manufacturing and supply chain logistics
services facilities located in 25 states in the United States and in Puerto Rico, as well as in Asia, Canada, Europe,
Mexico and Brazil. We lease our world headquarters located in Cleveland, Ohio, which also includes the world
headquarters for certain of our businesses. We believe our manufacturing, logistics and corporate office facilities
are well-maintained and are suitable and adequate, and have sufficient productive capacity to meet our current
needs.

16

The following table provides information relative to our principal facilities as of December 31, 2017.

Related Industry
Segment

SUPPLY
TECHNOLOGIES (1)

Location

Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Minneapolis, MN
Carnegie, PA
Cleveland, OH (2)

ASSEMBLY
COMPONENTS (3)

ENGINEERED
PRODUCTS (7)

Dayton, OH
Carol Stream, IL
Memphis, TN
Solon, OH
Streetsboro, OH
Allentown, PA
Suwanee, GA
Dublin, VA
Tulsa, OK

Ocala, FL
Conneaut, OH (4)
Lexington, TN
Lobelville, TN (5)
Rootstown, OH
Cleveland, OH (6)
Wapakoneta, OH
Angola, IN
Huntington, IN
Fremont, IN
Big Rapids, MI
Acuna, Mexico

Cicero, IL
Cuyahoga Heights, OH
Pune, India
Newport, AR
Warren, OH
Leini, Italy
Madison Heights, MI
Canton, OH
La Roeulx, Belgium
Brookfield, WI
Wickliffe, OH
Valencia, Spain
Euclid, OH
Albertville, AL
Chennai, India
Leini, Italy
Cortland, OH

Owned or
Leased

Approximate
Square Footage

Use

Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

Owned
Leased/Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased/Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned

Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Owned

217,000 Manufacturing

Logistics

87,100
63,000 Manufacturing
60,450

Supply Technologies
Corporate Office
Logistics
Logistics
Logistics
Logistics

56,000
51,000
48,750
47,100
45,000 Manufacturing
43,800
42,500
40,000
40,000

Logistics
Logistics
Logistics
Logistics

433,000 Manufacturing
283,800 Manufacturing
240,000 Manufacturing
208,700 Manufacturing
208,000 Manufacturing
190,000 Manufacturing
188,000 Manufacturing
135,000 Manufacturing
124,500 Manufacturing
112,000 Manufacturing
97,000 Manufacturing
79,000 Manufacturing

450,000 Manufacturing
427,000 Manufacturing
275,000 Manufacturing
200,000 Manufacturing
195,000 Manufacturing
161,500 Manufacturing
128,000 Manufacturing
124,000 Manufacturing
120,000 Manufacturing
116,000 Manufacturing
110,000 Manufacturing
81,000 Manufacturing
75,000 Manufacturing
56,000 Office
54,000 Manufacturing
53,800 Manufacturing
30,000 Office and Manufacturing

Includes 20,150 square feet used by Holdings’ corporate office.

(1) Supply Technologies has other facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility.
(2)
(3) Assembly Components has other facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility.
(4)

Includes three leased properties with square footage of 91,800, 64,000 and 45,700, respectively, and one owned
property with 82,300 square feet.
Includes five facilities, which make up the total square footage of 208,700.
(5)
(6)
Includes one leased property with 150,000 square feet and one owned property with 40,000 square feet.
(7) Engineered Products has other owned and leased facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility.

17

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are
asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty, in the
opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or threatened litigation are not expected
to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

In addition to the routine lawsuits and asserted claims noted above, we were a party to the lawsuits and legal

proceedings described below as of December 31, 2017:

We were a co-defendant in approximately 96 cases asserting claims on behalf of approximately 203
plaintiffs alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos. These asbestos cases generally relate to
production and sale of asbestos-containing products and allege various theories of liability, including negligence,
gross negligence and strict liability, and seek compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages.

In each asbestos case in which we are named as a party, the complaints are filed against multiple named
defendants. In substantially all of the asbestos cases, the plaintiffs either claim damages in excess of a specified
amount, typically a minimum amount sufficient to establish jurisdiction of the court in which the case was filed
(jurisdictional minimums generally range from $25,000 to $75,000), or do not specify the monetary damages
sought. To the extent that any specific amount of damages is sought, the amount applies to claims against all
named defendants.

There are four asbestos cases, involving 21 plaintiffs, that plead specified damages against named
defendants. In each of the four cases, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory and punitive damages based on a
variety of potentially alternative causes of action. In three cases, the plaintiff has alleged three counts at
$3.0 million compensatory and punitive damages each; one count at $3.0 million compensatory and $1.0 million
punitive damages; and one count at $1.0 million. In the fourth case, the plaintiff has alleged compensatory and
punitive damages, each in the amount of $20.0 million, for three separate causes of action, and $5.0 million
compensatory damages for the fifth cause of action.

Historically, we have been dismissed from asbestos cases on the basis that the plaintiff incorrectly sued one

of our subsidiaries or because the plaintiff failed to identify any asbestos-containing product manufactured or
sold by us or our subsidiaries. We intend to vigorously defend these asbestos cases, and believe we will continue
to be successful in being dismissed from such cases. However, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome
of asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings due to the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation.
Despite this uncertainty, and although our results of operations and cash flows for a particular period could be
adversely affected by asbestos-related lawsuits, claims and proceedings, management believes that the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results
of operations. Among the factors management considered in reaching this conclusion were: (a) our historical
success in being dismissed from these types of lawsuits on the bases mentioned above; (b) many cases have been
improperly filed against one of our subsidiaries; (c) in many cases the plaintiffs have been unable to establish any
causal relationship to us or our products or premises; (d) in many cases, the plaintiffs have been unable to
demonstrate that they have suffered any identifiable injury or compensable loss at all or that any injuries that they
have incurred did in fact result from alleged exposure to asbestos; and (e) the complaints assert claims against
multiple defendants and, in most cases, the damages alleged are not attributed to individual defendants.
Additionally, we do not believe that the amounts claimed in any of the asbestos cases are meaningful indicators
of our potential exposure because the amounts claimed typically bear no relation to the extent of the plaintiff’s
injury, if any.

Our cost of defending these lawsuits has not been material to date and, based upon available information,
our management does not expect its future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.

18

In August 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the staff of the Securities and Exchange

Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the staff’s investigation of a third party. At that time, the Company also
learned that the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is conducting a criminal investigation of the third party. In
connection with its initial response to the staff’s subpoena, the Company disclosed to the staff of the SEC that, in
November 2007, the third party participated in a payment on behalf of the Company to a foreign tax official that
implicates the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Board of Directors of the Company formed a special
committee to review the Company’s transactions with the third party and to make any recommendations to the
Board of Directors with respect thereto. The Company intends to cooperate fully with the SEC and the DOJ in
connection with their investigations of the third party and with the SEC in light of the Company’s disclosure. The
Company is unable to predict the outcome or impact of the special committee’s investigation or the length, scope
or results of the SEC’s review or the impact on its results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

19

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol

“PKOH”. The table below presents the intra-day high and low sales prices of the common stock during the
periods presented. The Company declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share commencing in
the second quarter of 2014 and has continued with quarterly dividends of $0.125 per share through the first
quarter of 2018. Additionally, the terms of the credit agreement governing our revolving credit facility and the
indenture governing the 6.625% senior notes due 2027 provide some restrictions on the amounts of dividends.

Quarterly Common Stock Price Ranges

Quarter

1st
2nd
3rd
4th

2017

2016

High

Low

High

Low

$ 47.00
41.05
$
46.05
$
47.80
$

$
$
$
$

34.25
34.33
37.00
40.25

$
$
$
$

43.47
42.94
38.79
44.65

$
$
$
$

23.55
23.21
27.37
30.01

The number of shareholders of record of our common stock as of February 28, 2018 was 378.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Set forth below is information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of the

year ended December 31, 2017.

Period

October 1 — October 31, 2017
November 1 — November 30, 2017
December 1 — December 31, 2017

Total

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid Per
Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans (1)

Maximum Number of
Shares That May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Program (1)

$

411
—
—

411 (2) $

45.60
—
—

45.60

—
—
16,014

16,014

624,120
624,120
608,106

608,106

(1) On March 4, 2013, we announced a share repurchase program whereby we may repurchase up to

1.0 million shares of our outstanding common stock.

(2) Consists of an aggregate total of 411 shares of common stock we acquired from recipients of restricted
stock awards at the time of vesting of such awards in order to settle recipient minimum withholding tax
liabilities.

20

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Income Statement Data:
Net sales
Operating income
Net income attributable to ParkOhio

common shareholders

Earnings per common share attributable

to ParkOhio shareholders:
Basic
Diluted

Cash dividend per common share

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

(In millions, except per share data)

$

1,412.9
90.2

$

1,276.9
69.2

$

1,463.8
97.9

$

1,378.7
97.9

$

1,203.2
85.6

28.6

31.7

48.1

45.6

43.4

$
$
$

2.34
2.30
0.50

$
$
$

2.62
2.58
0.50

$
$
$

3.94
3.88
0.50

$
$
$

$
$

3.77
3.68
0.375

3.40
3.31
—

Results for 2017 include income of $3.3 million from the reversal of a litigation reserve, a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $11.0 million and a one-time net tax expense of $4.2 million related to the U.S. Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the “U.S. Tax Act”).

Results for 2016 include an asset impairment charge of $4.0 million.

Results for 2015 and 2013 include litigation judgment costs of $2.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively.

Net income attributable to ParkOhio common shareholders in 2013 includes $3.0 million from discontinued
operations.

Other Financial Data:
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
Capital expenditures, net
Selected Balance Sheet Data (as of period end):
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
Long-term debt (1)

(1) Excluding current portion.

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

(In millions)

$

46.7
(27.9)

$ 72.9
(28.5)

$

$

44.7
(36.5)

$

53.6
(25.8)

60.3
(30.1)

82.8
1,132.5
515.5

64.3
974.3
439.0

62.0
942.1
445.8

58.0
969.1
429.3

55.2
813.0
373.5

21

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries.

All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

General

We are a diversified international company providing world-class customers with a supply chain
management outsourcing service, capital equipment used on their production lines, and manufactured
components used to assemble their products. We operate through three reportable segments: Supply
Technologies, Assembly Components and Engineered Products. Refer to Part 1, Item 1. Business for descriptions
of our business segments.

2017 Acquisitions

On April 28, 2017, the Company acquired AMC. AMC, which is included in our Supply Technologies
segment, is a supply chain management business providing high-quality specialty fasteners and other components
to the defense and aerospace markets in the United States.

On October 4, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of HAT. HAT, which is included in our Supply

Technologies segment, is a leading European supplier of supply chain management services specializing in
developing vendor-managed inventory programs of fasteners, machined parts and other class C components to
various industrial end markets.

At the end of December 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of an injection molding business.
The acquisition, which is included in our Assembly Components segment, is a manufacturer of precision-molded
rubber components for several industrial markets.

The results of operations of the 2017 acquisitions are included in our consolidated results from their
respective acquisition dates. Collectively, the 2017 acquisitions contributed $18.5 million of sales for the year
ended December 31, 2017.

U.S. Tax Reform

In December 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the

“Tax Cut and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) which includes a number of provisions, including lowering of the U.S.
corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and a Transition Tax on unremitted foreign
earnings and profits. As a result of the Tax Act, in the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a one-time
net tax expense of $4.2 million, which consisted of an expense from the Transition Tax of $14.2 million and a tax
benefit of $10.0 million resulting from the adjustment of deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect the decrease
in the corporate income tax rate.

Subsequent Event

On January 31, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per
common share. The dividend will be paid on March 1, 2018, to shareholders of record as of the close of business
on February 15, 2018, and resulted in a cash outlay of approximately $1.6 million.

On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Canton Drop Forge, Inc. (“CDF”). CDF is

headquartered in Canton, Ohio and will be part of our Forged and Machined Products group within the
Engineered Products segment. CDF manufactures forgings for high-performance applications in the global
aerospace and other markets.

22

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

2017 Compared with 2016 and 2016 Compared with 2015

2017

2016

2015

$ Change % Change

$ Change % Change

2017 vs. 2016

2016 vs. 2015

$1,412.9
1,178.3

$ 1,276.9
1,073.9

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
$ 136.0
104.4

$1,463.8
1,228.6

11% $ (186.9)
(154.7)
10%

234.6

203.0

235.2

31.6

16%

(32.2)

16.6%

15.9%

16.1%

(13)%
(13)%

(14)%

147.7

129.8

135.1

17.9

14%

(5.3)

(4)%

10.5%
—

10.2%
4.0

9.2%
—

(3.3)

90.2
31.5
11.0

47.7
18.2

29.5

—

69.2
28.2
—

41.0
8.8

32.2

2.2

97.9
27.9
—

70.0
21.3

48.7

(4.0)

(3.3)

21.0
3.3
11.0

6.7
9.4

(2.7)

*

*

30%
12%
*

16%
107%

(8)%

4.0

(2.2)

(28.7)
0.3
—

(29.0)
(12.5)

(16.5)

*

*

(29)%
1%
*

(41)%
(59)%

(34)%

(0.9)

(0.5)

(0.6)

(0.4)

*

0.1

*

$

28.6

$

31.7

$

48.1

$

(3.1)

(10)% $ (16.4)

(34)%

$

$

2.34

2.30

$

$

2.62

2.58

$

$

3.94

$ (0.28)

(11)% $ (1.32)

(34)%

3.88

$ (0.28)

(11)% $ (1.30)

(34)%

Net sales
Cost of sales

Gross profit

Gross profit as a percentage of

net sales

Selling, general and

administrative (“SG&A”)
expenses

SG&A expenses as a

percentage of net sales
Asset impairment charge
Litigation (settlement gains)

judgment costs

Operating income

Interest expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest

Net income attributable to
ParkOhio common
shareholders:

Earnings per common share
attributable to ParkOhio
common shareholders:
Basic

Diluted

* Calculation not meaningful

2017 Compared with 2016

Net Sales

Net sales increased 11% to $1,412.9 million in 2017 compared to $1,276.9 million in 2016. The increase in

net sales was primarily due to higher end market demand for products in our Supply Technologies and
Engineered Products segments, and the 2017 sales contributions from both our GH Electrotermia S.A. (“GH”)
acquisition completed at the end of 2016 and the 2017 acquisitions of AMC and HAT. Excluding the impact of
acquisitions, net sales grew by 5% in 2017 compared to 2016.

23

Cost of Sales & Gross Profit

Cost of sales increased 10% to $1,178.3 million in 2017 compared to $1,073.9 million in 2016. The increase

in cost of sales was primarily due to the increase in net sales of 11%, described above. Our gross margin
percentage was 16.6% in 2017 compared to 15.9% in 2016. This 70 basis point improvement was primarily due
to the profit flow-through from higher sales in 2017, the benefit of cost reduction actions taken in 2016, and
favorable product mix.

SG&A Expenses

SG&A expenses increased to $147.7 million in 2017 from $129.8 million in 2016, driven by SG&A
expenses from the acquisitions, as well as the higher sales levels in 2017. SG&A expenses as a percentage of
sales was relatively consistent year-over-year, at 10.5% in 2017 compared to 10.2% in 2016.

Litigation Settlement Gain

During 2017, the Company paid $4.0 million to settle the IPSCO litigation. In connection with the

settlement, the Company recognized $3.3 million of income related to the reversal of its excess litigation
liability.

Asset Impairment Charge

An asset impairment charge of $4.0 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 due to the accelerated

end of production in certain programs with an automotive customer in our aluminum products business.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased to $31.5 million in 2017 from $28.2 million in 2016, due primarily to higher

outstanding borrowings. Our average borrowing rate was relatively consistent year-over-year.

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

Interest expense
Average outstanding borrowings
Average borrowing rate

$
$

(Dollars in millions)
31.5
515.6

$
$

6.11%

28.2
462.1
6.10%

As described more fully below, in April 2017, we refinanced our outstanding senior notes, increasing the

principal amount from $250 million to $350 million and reducing the interest rate from 8.125% to 6.625%. The
net impact of the higher senior notes balance at a lower rate was an increase in interest expense of approximately
$2.1 million in 2017.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

During 2017, we incurred $11.0 million of expenses related to our debt refinancing activities. Such expenses
included tender premiums, bank and other fees and accelerated amortization of certain debt issuance costs related
to our former borrowings that were previously capitalized.

Income Tax Expense

The provision for income taxes was $18.2 million in 2017 (an effective rate of 38.0%) and $8.8 million in

2016 (an effective rate of 21.5%). Income taxes in 2017 include a net $4.2 million of expense related to the U.S.

24

Tax Act, as discussed more fully above. Excluding the impact of the U.S. Tax Act, the effective tax rate would
have been 29.2%. In 2017 and 2016, the Company reversed various income tax accruals of approximately
$1.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, relating to previous uncertain tax positions for which the statutes of
limitations expired.

Excluding the one-time impact of the U.S. Tax Act, the effective rates in both years are lower than the U.S.

statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the income tax accrual reversals mentioned above, as well as earnings in
jurisdictions in which the income tax rates are lower than the U.S. statutory income tax rate.

2016 Compared with 2015

Net Sales

Net sales decreased 13% to $1,276.9 million in 2016 compared to $1,463.8 million in 2015. The decrease in
net sales was mainly due to lower end-market demand for our products in each of our segments, primarily in our
aluminum products, heavy-duty truck and power sport end markets.

Cost of Sales & Gross Profit

Cost of sales decreased 13% to $1,073.9 million in 2016 compared to $1,228.6 million in 2015. The

decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to the decrease in net sales of 13%. Our gross margin percentage was
15.9% in 2016 compared to 16.1% in 2015. This 20 basis point decline was largely due to lower fixed cost
absorption in certain of our manufacturing locations affected by lower customer demand, partially offset by the
favorable impact of manufacturing efficiencies and cost reduction actions taken in response to lower sales levels.

SG&A Expenses

Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased to $129.8 million in 2016 from $135.1 million in 2015, driven by

the favorable impact of cost reduction actions and lower selling expenses as a result of lower sales volumes.
SG&A expenses as a percent of sales increased to 10.2% in 2016 compared to 9.2% in 2015, due primarily to the
lower revenue base in 2016 compared to the prior year.

Asset Impairment Charge

An asset impairment charge of $4.0 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 due to the accelerated

end of production in certain programs with an automotive customer.

Litigation Judgment Costs

In 2015, the Company accrued $2.2 million in response to a district court’s award in connection with

ongoing litigation. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for further
discussion.

Interest Expense

Interest expense
Average outstanding borrowings
Average borrowing rate

$
$

25

Year Ended December 31,

2016

2015

(Dollars in millions)
28.2
462.1
6.10%

$
$

27.9
461.7
6.04%

Interest expense was approximately $28 million in 2016 and 2015. During 2016, we reduced outstanding
indebtedness by $33.4 million, using cash flow from operating activities, before borrowing $26.4 million to fund
the GH acquisition. The average borrowing rate increased slightly from the prior year due to rising interest rates.
See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for further discussion.

Income Tax Expense

The provision for income taxes was $8.8 million in 2016 (an effective rate of 21.5%) and $21.3 million in

2015 (an effective rate of 30.4%). The amount in 2016 includes reversal of various income tax accruals of
approximately $4.0 million relating to previous uncertain tax positions for which the statutes of limitations
expired. The effective rates in both years are lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35% due primarily to earnings
in jurisdictions in which the income tax rates are lower than the U.S. statutory income tax rate.

SEGMENT RESULTS

For purposes of measuring business segment performance, the Company utilizes segment operating income,

which is defined as revenues less expenses identifiable to the product lines within each segment. The Company
does not allocate items that are non-operating or unusual in nature or are corporate costs, which include but are
not limited to executive compensation and corporate office costs. Segment operating income reconciles to
consolidated income before income taxes by deducting corporate costs, certain non-cash charges and interest
expense.

Supply Technologies Segment

Net sales
Segment operating income
Segment operating income margin

2017 Compared to 2016

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

$
$

561.8
45.9

(Dollars in millions)
$
502.1
$
40.0

$
$

8.2%

8.0%

578.7
50.3

8.7%

Net Sales: Net sales were up 12% in 2017 compared to 2016, due primarily to organic growth of 8% and
the sales from the 2017 acquisitions. The organic growth was due primarily to higher customer demand in the
Company’s power sport and recreational equipment market, which was up 16%; the Company’s truck and truck-
related market, which was up 5%; the Company’s semiconductor market, which was up 37%; and the Company’s
commercial aerospace market, which was up 25% compared to 2016.

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income increased by $5.9 million in 2017 compared to

2016, and segment operating income margin increased by 20 basis points, due primarily to the higher sales
volumes noted above.

2016 Compared to 2015

Net Sales: Net sales were down 13% in 2016 compared to 2015 due primarily to lower customer demand in

the Company’s heavy-duty truck and related market, which was down 33%; the Company’s power sports and
recreational equipment market, which was down 20%; and the Company’s bus and coach market, which was
down 33%. These declines were partially offset by an increase in sales in the Company’s aerospace market,
which was up 72% compared to 2015.

26

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income decreased by $10.3 million, and segment operating

income margin declined by 70 basis points, due primarily to the volume reductions noted above. This negative
impact was partially offset by the benefits of our 2016 cost reduction actions.

Assembly Components Segment

Net sales
Segment operating income
Segment operating income margin

2017 Compared to 2016

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

$
$

524.5
50.4

(Dollars in millions)
$
529.4
$
50.5

$
$

9.6%

9.5%

569.2
57.9
10.2%

Net Sales: Net sales were down 1% in 2017 compared to 2016 due primarily to lower sales volumes in our
extruded rubber and plastic product lines and our aluminum product line, which more than offset higher sales in
our fuel filler pipe and fuel rail product lines. The lower sales volumes in rubber and plastic were due primarily
to the end of life in certain programs, and the lower sales volumes in aluminum were due to the end of production
in certain programs during 2016. The higher sales volumes in our fuel products businesses were driven by new
product launches and higher foreign sales, particularly in China and Mexico.

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income and operating income margin was relatively
consistent year over year. The favorable impact of higher sales in our fuel products businesses offset the impact
of lower sales in rubber, plastics and aluminum, as well as start-up costs of approximately $1.4 million incurred
by the segment during 2017 related to our new facilities in China.

2016 Compared to 2015

Net Sales: Net sales were down 7% in 2016 compared to 2015 due primarily to the accelerated end of
production resulting in volume reductions from certain programs with an automotive customer in our aluminum
business. This decline was partially offset by higher sales in our gasoline direct injection fuel rail systems, which
was up 36%, and rubber products businesses, which was up 13%, driven by new product launches.

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income decreased by $7.4 million, and segment operating

income margin declined by 70 basis points, compared to 2015. These decreases were due primarily to lower sales
in our aluminum business as described above, unfavorable sales mix and excess start-up costs related to our
launch of new high-volume products in our fuel rail and fuel filler plants. These factors were partially offset by
the impact of higher sales in our gasoline direct injection fuel rail systems and rubber products businesses in
2016 compared to 2015, as well as benefits of our 2016 cost reduction actions.

Engineered Products Segment

Net sales
Segment operating income
Segment operating income margin

2017 Compared to 2016

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

$
$

326.6
20.7

(Dollars in millions)
$
245.4
$
10.6

$
$

6.3%

4.3%

315.9
20.9

6.6%

Net Sales: Net sales were up 33% in 2017 compared to 2016 due primarily to $55 million of sales at GH,

which was acquired at the end of 2016, and increased customer demand for our induction heating and pipe
threading products in our legacy businesses.

27

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income increased by $10.1 million, and segment operating

income margin increased by 200 basis points, due primarily to the higher sales in 2017 and the benefit of cost
reduction actions taken in 2016 in response to lower sales levels a year ago.

2016 Compared to 2015

Net Sales: Net sales were down 22% in 2016 compared to 2015 due primarily to lower customer demand in

the oil and gas, rail, steel, commercial aerospace and military end markets.

Segment Operating Income: Segment operating income decreased by $10.3 million, and segment operating

income margin declined by 230 basis points, due primarily to volume declines in our induction heating, pipe
threading and forging businesses related to the weak market demand noted above. These factors were partially
offset by the benefits of cost reduction actions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes the major components of cash flows:

Cash provided (used) by:
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities

Effect of exchange rate on cash

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

Operating Activities

2017

2016

2015

$ 46.7
(67.6)
33.7
5.7

(In millions)
$ 72.9
(51.9)
(17.2)
(1.5)

$ 44.7
(36.5)
0.7
(4.9)

$ 18.5

$ 2.3

$ 4.0

Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $26.2 million in 2017 compared to 2016, driven by

higher sales levels in 2017, which resulted in higher accounts receivable balances in 2017 compared to 2016.

Cash provided by operating activities increased by $28.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015, driven by lower

working capital needs (accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable and other accrued expenses) in
2016 compared to 2015. Lower sales levels in 2016 resulted in lower inventory and accounts receivable balances,
and, in 2015, higher inventories and lower accounts payable balances combined to use cash of $52.3 million. The
lower working capital in 2016 was partially offset by lower net income of $16.5 million.

Investing Activities

Capital expenditures were $27.9 million in 2017, $28.5 million in 2016 and $36.5 million in 2015. These

capital expenditures were primarily for growth initiatives, with the majority in our Assembly Component
segment as we launch new business in our fuel product lines.

In 2017, we spent a combined $39.7 million on acquisitions of businesses. See Note 3 to the consolidated

financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional information.

In 2016, we spent $23.4 million on the acquisition of GH. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial

statements included elsewhere herein for additional information.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities in 2017 reflected the proceeds from our issuance of senior notes in

April 2017, net of the premium on the early extinguishment of our former senior notes and bank financing fees,

28

repayments under our amended and restated revolving credit facility and the payoff of our previously-outstanding
term loan and senior notes. During 2017, we also paid dividends of $6.9 million and repurchased treasury shares
for $4.2 million.

Cash used by financing activities in 2016 consisted primarily of the net payments of debt instruments of
$7.0 million, payment of cash dividends of $6.2 million and payment of an acquisition earn-out of $2.0 million.
During the year, we reduced outstanding indebtedness by $33.4 million using cash flow from operating activities,
before borrowing $26.4 million to fund the GH acquisition.

Cash provided by financing activities in 2015 consisted primarily of net borrowings on debt instruments of

$20.4 million, offset by payment of cash dividends of $6.3 million and repurchased treasury shares of
$15.5 million.

Liquidity

Overall, our net borrowings and cash provided by operating activities were used to fund higher working
capital needs, the litigation settlement payment, our quarterly cash dividend payments, share repurchases, and
debt refinancing costs. In addition, our cash balances increased by $18.5 million at December 31, 2017 compared
to the beginning of 2017. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for
further discussion.

The following table summarizes our indicators of liquidity:

2017

2016

Cash and cash equivalents
Gross debt (excluding unamortized debt issuance costs)
Working capital (excluding cash)
Net debt as a % of capitalization

$
$
$

(Dollars in millions)
82.8
541.9
310.7

64.3
475.0
246.5

$
$
$

56%

58%

As of December 31, 2017, we had $124.7 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility,

approximately $194.2 million of unused borrowing availability and cash and cash equivalents of $82.8 million.

Our liquidity needs are primarily for working capital and capital expenditures. Our primary sources of
liquidity have been funds provided by operations, funds available from existing bank credit arrangements and the
sale of our debt securities. Our existing financial resources (working capital and available bank borrowing
arrangements) and anticipated funds from operations are expected to be adequate to meet anticipated cash
requirements for at least the next twelve months, including but not limited to our ability to maintain current
operations and fund capital expenditure requirements, service our debt and pay dividends.

The Company had cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries of $76.0 million at December 31,
2017 and $54.4 million at December 31, 2016. We do not expect restrictions on repatriation of cash held outside
the U.S. to have a material effect on our overall liquidity, financial condition or results of operations for the
foreseeable future.

Senior Notes

On April 17, 2017, we completed the sale, in a private placement, of $350.0 million aggregate principal

amount of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”). The net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were
used to repay in full our previously outstanding 8.125% Senior Notes due 2021 and our outstanding term loan,
and to repay a portion of the borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

29

Credit Agreement

On April 17, 2017, the Company entered into Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the
“Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, among other things, provides an increased revolving credit facility
of up to $350.0 million and extends the maturity date of borrowings under the facility to April 17, 2022.
Furthermore, the Company has the option, pursuant to the Credit Agreement, to increase the availability under
the revolving credit facility by an aggregate incremental amount up to $100.0 million.

As of December 31, 2017, we had $124.7 million outstanding and $194.2 million of unused borrowing

availability under the revolving credit facility provided by the Credit Agreement

Capital Leases

On August 13, 2015, the Company entered into a Capital Lease Agreement (the “Lease Agreement”). The

Lease Agreement provides the Company up to $50.0 million for capital leases. Capital lease obligations of
$20.3 million were borrowed under the Lease Agreement to acquire machinery and equipment as of
December 31, 2017.

Covenants

The future availability of bank borrowings under the revolving credit facility provided by the Credit
Agreement is based on our ability to meet a debt service ratio covenant, which could be materially impacted by
negative economic trends. Failure to meet the debt service ratio covenant could materially impact the availability
and interest rate of future borrowings.

At December 31, 2017, our debt service coverage ratio was 2.2, and, therefore, we were in compliance with

the debt service coverage ratio covenant in the revolving credit facility provided by the Credit Agreement. The
debt service coverage ratio is calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter based on the following ratio: (1) the
most recently ended four fiscal quarters of consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, minus
cash taxes paid, minus unfunded capital expenditures, plus cash tax refunds; to (2) consolidated debt charges,
which are consolidated cash interest expense, plus scheduled principal payments on indebtedness, plus scheduled
reductions in our term debt as defined in the Credit Agreement. The debt service coverage ratio must be greater
than 1.0 and not less than 1.15 for any two consecutive fiscal quarters. We were also in compliance with the other
covenants contained in the revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2017. While we expect to remain in
compliance throughout 2018, declines in sales volumes in 2018 could adversely impact our ability to remain in
compliance with certain of these financial covenants. Additionally, to the extent our customers are adversely
affected by declines in the economy in general, they may be unable to pay their accounts payable to us on a
timely basis or at all, which could make our accounts receivable ineligible for purposes of the revolving credit
facility and could reduce our borrowing base and our ability to borrow under such facility.

Dividends

The company paid dividends of $6.9 million during 2017. In January 2018, our Board of Directors declared
a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per common share. The dividend will be paid on March 1, 2018 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business on February 15, 2018 and resulted in a cash outlay of approximately
$1.6 million. Although we currently intend to pay a quarterly dividend on an ongoing basis, all future dividend
declarations will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and dependent upon then-existing conditions,
including our operating results and financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business
prospects and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

30

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our principal contractual obligations and other commercial commitments

over various future periods as of December 31, 2017:

(In millions)

Short-term and long-term debt

obligations

Interest obligations (1)
Operating lease obligations
Capital lease obligations
Purchase obligations (2)
Pension obligations (3)
Postretirement obligations (3)
Standby letters of credit and bank

guarantees

Total

Payments Due or Commitment Expiration Per Period

Total

Less Than
1 Year

1-3 Years

3-5 Years

More than
5 Years

$

$

521.6
225.8
64.1
20.3
212.3
45.8
8.7

28.6

$

8.6
23.2
17.8
9.1
212.2
5.1
1.2

21.6

$

19.3
46.4
22.4
9.9
0.1
8.9
2.1

5.1

$

141.2
46.4
10.6
1.3
—
9.0
1.8

1.9

352.5
109.8
13.3
—
—
22.8
3.6

—

$

1,127.2

$

298.8

$

114.2

$

212.2

$

502.0

(1)

Interest obligations are included on the Notes only and assume the Notes are paid at maturity. The
calculation of interest on debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility and other variable rate debt
($4.1 million based on 3.30% average interest rate and outstanding borrowings of $124.7 million at
December 31, 2017) is not included above due to the estimation required.

(2) Purchase obligations include contractual obligations for raw materials and services.
(3) Pension and postretirement obligations include projected benefit payments to participants only through

2027.

The table above excludes the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits disclosed in Note 7 to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, since we cannot predict, with reasonable reliability,
the timing of potential cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities.

We expect that funds provided by operations plus available borrowings under our revolving credit facility

will be adequate to meet our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financing or other relationships with unconsolidated

entities or other persons or derivative instruments.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect amounts reported in our
consolidated financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that
are used to prepare financial statements. Management has made their best estimates and judgments of certain
amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We do not believe that
there is great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using
different assumptions related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these
accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a
result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

31

Certain accounting policies that require significant management estimates and are deemed critical to our
results of operations or financial position are discussed below. On a regular basis, critical accounting policies are
reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Revenue Recognition: We recognize revenue, other than from long-term contracts, when title is transferred

to the customer, typically upon shipment. Revenue from long-term contracts is accounted for under the
percentage of completion method, and recognized on the basis of the percentage each contract’s cost to date
bears to the total estimated contract cost. We follow this method since reasonably reliable estimates of revenue
and costs of a contract can be made. Revenue earned on contracts in process that are in excess of billings is
classified in Other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Billings in excess of revenues
earned on contracts in process are classified in Other accrued expenses in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet and totaled $23.0 million and $22.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Allowance for Obsolete and Slow-Moving Inventory:

Inventories are valued using First-In, First-Out
(“FIFO”) and stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value and have been reduced by an allowance for
obsolete and slow-moving inventories. The estimated allowance is based on management’s review of inventories
on hand with minimal sales activity, which is compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories
identified by management as slow-moving or obsolete are reserved for based on estimated selling prices less
disposal costs. Though we consider these allowances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in
specific markets in which we operate could have a material effect on allowances required.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360,

“Property, Plant and Equipment,” management performs impairment tests of long-lived assets, including
property and equipment, whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying value
may not be recoverable or the useful life of the asset has changed. We review our long-lived assets for indicators
of impairment such as a decision to idle certain facilities and consolidate certain operations, a current-period
operating or cash flow loss or a forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-
lived asset and the expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of
significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. When we identify impairment indicators, we
determine whether the carrying amount of our long-lived assets is recoverable by comparing the carrying value to
the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. We
consider whether impairments exist at the lowest level of independent identifiable cash flows within a reporting
unit (for example, plant location, program level or asset level). If the carrying value of the assets exceeds the
expected cash flows, we estimate the fair value of these assets by using appraisals or recent selling experience in
selling similar assets, or for certain assets with reasonably predictable cash flows by performing a discounted
cash flow analysis to estimate fair value when market information is not available to determine whether an
impairment existed. An asset impairment charge of $4.0 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2016 due
to sales volume declines in certain programs with an automotive customer.

Business Combinations, Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets: Business combinations are accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting. This method requires the Company to record assets and liabilities of
the business acquired at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The Company uses valuation
specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions.

As required by ASC 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), management performs

impairment testing of goodwill at least annually, as of October 1 of each year, or more frequently if impairment
indicators arise. In accordance with ASC 350, management tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit
level. A reporting unit is an operating segment pursuant to ASC 280, “Segment Reporting”, or one level below
the operating segment (component level) as determined by the availability of discrete financial information that
is regularly reviewed by operating segment management. Our reporting units have been identified at the

32

component level. For 2017 and 2016, we performed quantitative testing for each reporting unit with a goodwill
balance. In 2015, we performed our testing using both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Goodwill testing compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value. To the extent
that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded. In
applying the quantitative approach, we rely on a number of factors, including future business plans, actual and
forecasted operating results, and market data. The significant assumptions employed under this method include
discount rates; revenue growth rates, including assumed terminal growth rates; future capital expenditures and
working capital needs; and operating margins used to project future cash flows for a reporting unit. The discount
rates utilized reflect market-based estimates of capital costs and discount rates adjusted for management’s
assessment of a market participant’s view with respect to other risks associated with the projected cash flows of
the individual reporting unit. Our estimates are based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which
by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. We believe we incorporate ample sensitivity ranges into our analysis
of goodwill impairment testing for a reporting unit, such that actual experience would need to be materially out
of the range of expected assumptions in order for an impairment to remain undetected.

The results of testing as of October 1, 2017, 2016 and 2015 for all reporting units confirmed that the

estimated fair value exceeded carrying values, and no impairment existed as of those dates.

Additionally, we test all indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, as of October 1

of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. In 2017 and 2016, we utilized a quantitative
approach. In 2015, we utilized a combination of qualitative and quantitative assessments. Our fiscal 2017, 2016
and 2015 annual impairment tests of each of our indefinite-lived intangible assets did not result in any
impairment loss. The significant assumptions employed under this method include discount rates and revenue
growth rates, including assumed terminal growth rates. The discount rates utilized reflect market-based estimates
of capital costs and discount rates adjusted for management’s assessment of a market participant’s view with
respect to other risks associated with the projected cash flows of the individual reporting unit. Our estimates are
based upon assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which by nature are uncertain and unpredictable. We
believe we incorporate ample sensitivity ranges into our analysis of intangible impairment testing, such that
actual experience would need to be materially out of the range of expected assumptions in order for an
impairment to remain undetected.

See Notes 4 and 5 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional

disclosure on goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles.

Income Taxes:

In accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), we account for income taxes

under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured
using the currently enacted tax rates. Specifically, we measure gross deferred tax assets for deductible temporary
differences and carryforwards, such as operating losses and tax credits, using the applicable enacted tax rates and
apply the more likely than not measurement criterion.

In determining the adequacy of valuation allowances, we consider cumulative and anticipated amounts of

domestic and international earnings or losses, anticipated amounts of foreign source income, and the anticipated
taxable income resulting from the reversal of future taxable temporary differences. We intend to maintain any
recorded valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence, such as cumulative positive foreign earnings or
additional foreign source income, exists to support reversal of the tax valuation allowances.

Further, at each interim reporting period, we estimate an effective income tax rate that is expected to be
applicable for the full year. Significant judgment is involved regarding the application of global income tax laws
and regulations and when projecting the jurisdictional mix of income. Additionally, interpretation of tax laws,
court decisions or other guidance provided by taxing authorities influences our estimate of the effective income

33

tax rates. As a result, our actual annual effective income tax rates and related income tax liabilities may differ
materially from our interim estimated effective tax rates and related income tax liabilities. Any resulting
differences are recorded in the period they become known.

During 2017 and 2016, the Company reversed various income tax accruals totaling approximately

$1.6 million and $4.0 million, respectively, relating to previous uncertain tax positions for which the statutes of
limitations expired.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans: We and our subsidiaries have pension plans, principally
noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans and postretirement benefit plans
covering substantially all employees. The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on
management’s assumptions related to future events, including interest rates, return on pension plan assets, rate of
compensation increases, and health care cost trends. Pension plan asset performance in the future will directly
impact our net income. We have evaluated our pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions, considering
current trends in interest rates and market conditions and believe our assumptions are appropriate.

We consult with our actuaries at least annually when reviewing and selecting the discount rates to be used.

The discount rates used by the Company are based on yields of various corporate and governmental bond indices
with actual maturity dates that approximate the estimated benefit payment streams of the related pension plans.
The discount rates are also reviewed in comparison with current benchmark indices, economic market conditions
and the movement in the benchmark yield since the previous fiscal year. The liability weighted-average discount
rate for the defined benefit pension plan is 3.52% for 2017, compared with 3.91% in 2016. For the other
postretirement benefit plan, the rate is 3.32% for 2017 and 3.63% for 2016. This rate represents the interest rates
generally available in the United States, which is the Company’s only country with other postretirement benefit
liabilities. Another assumption that affects the Company’s pension expense is the expected long-term rate of
return on assets. The Company’s pension plans are funded. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of
return on assets assumption is 8.25% for 2017. In determining the expected return on plan assets, we consider
both historical performance and an estimate of future long-term rates of return on assets similar to those in our
plan. We consult with and consider opinions of financial and actuarial experts in developing appropriate return
assumptions.

Changes in the related pension benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in assumptions. The
following table illustrates the sensitivity to a change in the assumed discount rate and expected long-term rate of
return on assets for the Company’s pension plans and other postretirement plans as of December 31, 2017:

Change in Assumption

Impact on 2017 Benefit
Expense

Impact on 2017
Projected Benefit
Obligation for Pension
Benefits

Impact on 2017
Projected Benefit
Obligation for
Postretirement Benefits

50 basis point decrease in discount rate
50 basis point increase in discount rate
50 basis point decrease in expected return on

assets

$
$

$

— $
— $

(Dollars in millions)
3.1
(2.8)

$
$

0.7

$

— $

0.3
(0.3)

—

See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for further analysis

regarding the sensitivity of the key assumptions applied in the actuarial valuations.

Legal Contingencies: We are involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and administrative

proceedings with respect to commercial, premises liability, product liability, employment and environmental
matters arising from the ordinary course of business. We accrue reserves for legal contingencies, on an
undiscounted basis, when it is probable that we have incurred a liability and we can reasonably estimate an
amount. When a single amount cannot be reasonably estimated, but the cost can be estimated within a range and

34

no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount in the
range. Based upon facts and information currently available, we believe the amounts reserved are adequate for
such pending matters. We monitor the development of legal proceedings on a regular basis and will adjust our
reserves when, and to the extent, additional information becomes available.

Recent and Future Adoption of Accounting Standards

See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

Environmental

We have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party sites under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or comparable state laws, which
provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability. We are participating in the cost of
certain clean-up efforts at several of these sites. However, our share of such costs has not been material and
based on available information, management does not expect our exposure at any of these locations to have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

We have been named as one of many defendants in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits.

Our cost of defending such lawsuits has not been material to date and, based upon available information,
management does not expect our future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. We caution, however, that inherent in management’s
estimates of our exposure are expected trends in claims severity, frequency and other factors that may materially
vary as claims are filed and settled or otherwise resolved.

Seasonality; Variability of Operating Results

The timing of orders placed by our customers has varied with, among other factors, orders for customers’
finished goods, customer production schedules, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. The
variability of the level and timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant periodic and quarterly
fluctuations in the operations of our business units. Such variability is particularly evident in the industrial
equipment business unit included in the Engineered Products segment, which typically ships a few large systems
per year.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are “forward-looking statements” within

the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The words “believes”,
“anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-
looking statements.

These forward-looking statements, including statements regarding future performance of the Company, that

are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results,
performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, the following: our
substantial indebtedness; the uncertainty of the global economic environment; general business conditions and
competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation; demand for our products and services;
raw material availability and pricing; fluctuations in energy costs; component part availability and pricing;
changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers; the financial condition of our customers, including the
impact of any bankruptcies; our ability to successfully integrate recent and future acquisitions into existing
operations; the amounts and timing, if any, of purchases of our common stock; changes in general domestic

35

economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and
healthcare costs, recessions and changing government policies, laws and regulations, including those related to
the current global uncertainties and crises; adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and customers from acts of
terrorism or hostilities; our ability to meet various covenants, including financial covenants, contained in the
agreements governing our indebtedness; disruptions, uncertainties or volatility in the credit markets that may
limit our access to capital; potential disruption due to a partial or complete reconfiguration of the European
Union; increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting the
environment or import and export controls and other trade barriers; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing
our potential liability for environmental remediation-related activities; the outcome of pending and future
litigation and other claims and disputes with customers; the outcome of the review conducted by the special
committee of our board of directors; our dependence on the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, which
are highly cyclical; the dependence of the automotive industry on consumer spending; our ability to negotiate
contracts with labor unions; our dependence on key management; our dependence on information systems; our
ability to continue to pay cash dividends, and the other factors we describe under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on
which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these and other
uncertainties, the inclusion of a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a representation by
us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. The Company assumes no obligation to update the information
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except to the extent required by law.

36

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk, including changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2017, we are subject

to interest rate risk on borrowings under the floating rate revolving credit facility provided by our Credit
Agreement, which consisted of borrowings of $124.7 million at December 31, 2017. A 100 basis point increase
in the interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense on these borrowings of approximately
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local currencies. We face translation risks related to

the changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated in U.S.
dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded
as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders’ equity section of the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Sales and expenses at our foreign operations are translated into U.S.
dollars at the applicable monthly average exchange rates. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either
positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.

Our largest exposures to commodity prices relate to steel and natural gas prices, which have fluctuated
widely in recent years. We do not have any commodity swap agreements, forward purchase or hedge contracts.

37

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Income — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016

and 2015

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) — Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Supplementary Financial Data
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying accounts

Page

39
40
41
42

43
44
45
46
72
73
73

38

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of
income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

(United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 8, 2018 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to

express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we

plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the
risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1967.

Cleveland, Ohio
March 8, 2018

39

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion,
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United

States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a) and our report dated March 8, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s

assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal
controls of Aero-Missile Components, Inc., Head & All Threads, Ltd., and an injection molding business, which is included
in the 2017 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted approximately 5% of the Company’s total
assets as of December 31, 2017, and approximately 1% of the Company’s total revenues, for the year then ended. Our audit
of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over
financial reporting of Aero-Missile Components, Inc., Heads & All Threads, Ltd., and the injection molding business.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for
its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and

perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect

misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 8, 2018

40

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

(In millions, except share
data)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories, net
Other current assets

Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Pension assets
Other long-term assets

Total assets

$

$

82.8
242.6
282.8
61.4

669.6
177.0
100.2
99.5
74.3
11.9

$

1,132.5

$

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Trade accounts payable
Current portion of long-term debt and short-term debt
Accrued employee compensation
Other accrued expenses

Total current liabilities

Long-term liabilities, less current portion:

Debt
Deferred income taxes
Other long-term liabilities

Total long-term liabilities

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries shareholders’ equity:

Capital stock, par value $1 a share

Serial preferred stock: Authorized — 632,470 shares: Issued and

outstanding — none

Common stock: Authorized — 40,000,000 shares; Issued — 15,153,009

shares in 2017 and 14,846,035 in 2016

Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,624,354 shares in 2017 and 2,446,111 shares in 2016
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries shareholders’ equity

Noncontrolling interests

Total equity

$

$

173.7
17.7
23.0
61.7

276.1

515.5
22.3
30.6

568.4

—

15.2
117.8
216.1
(55.2)
(17.9)

276.0
12.0

288.0

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

$

1,132.5

$

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

41

64.3
194.4
240.6
53.4

552.7
167.1
86.6
96.6
61.7
9.6

974.3

133.6
30.8
18.8
58.7

241.9

439.0
27.7
29.7

496.4

—

14.9
108.8
193.6
(48.6)
(42.7)

226.0
10.0

236.0

974.3

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

Net sales
Cost of sales

Gross profit

Selling, general and administrative expenses
Litigation (settlement gains) judgment costs
Asset impairment charge

Operating income

Interest expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

Net income attributable to ParkOhio common

shareholders

Earnings per common share attributable to ParkOhio

common shareholders:
Basic

Diluted

Weighted-average shares used to compute earnings per

share:
Basic

Diluted

Cash dividend per common share

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

(In millions, except per share data)

$

1,412.9
1,178.3

$

1,276.9
1,073.9

$

1,463.8
1,228.6

234.6
147.7
(3.3)
—

90.2
31.5
11.0

47.7
18.2

29.5
(0.9)

203.0
129.8
—
4.0

69.2
28.2
—

41.0
8.8

32.2
(0.5)

235.2
135.1
2.2
—

97.9
27.9
—

70.0
21.3

48.7
(0.6)

$

$

$

$

28.6

$

31.7

$

48.1

2.34

2.30

12.2

12.5

0.50

$

$

$

2.62

2.58

12.1

12.3

0.50

$

$

$

3.94

3.88

12.2

12.4

0.50

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

42

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustments
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments, net of tax

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

Comprehensive income attributable to ParkOhio common

$

29.5

19.2
5.6

24.8

54.3
(0.9)

(In millions)
32.2

$

$

48.7

(13.9)
1.2

(12.7)

19.5
(0.5)

(11.8)
(4.2)

(16.0)

32.7
(0.6)

shareholders

$

53.4

$

19.0

$

32.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

43

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Treasury
Stock

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income

Noncontrolling
Interest

Total

Balance at January 1, 2015

14,513,821 $ 14.5 $

89.8 $ 126.5 $

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Shares Amount

(In whole
shares)

—
—
72,500
(29,836)
14,000
83,500
—

—

—

14,653,985
—
—
172,550
(4,000)
1,500
22,000

—
—
0.1
—
—
0.1
—

—

—

14.7
—
—
0.2
—
—
—
—

—
7.3
(0.1)
—
—
1.1
—

—

0.9

99.0
—
10.6
(0.2)
—
—
0.5
—

48.1
—
—
—
—
—
(6.3)

—

—

168.3
31.7
—
—
—
—
—
(6.2)

(In millions)

$

(31.2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

(15.5)

—

(46.7)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Comprehensive income (loss)
Share-based compensation
Restricted stock awards
Restricted stock cancelled
Performance shares issued
Exercise of stock options
Dividends
Purchase of treasury stock (369,211

shares)

Income tax effect of share-based
compensation exercises and
vesting

Balance at December 31, 2015

Comprehensive income (loss)
Share-based compensation
Restricted stock awards
Restricted stock cancelled
Performance shares issued
Exercise of stock options
Dividends
Purchase of treasury stock (62,208

shares)

Income tax effect of share-based
compensation exercises and
vesting
Acquisition
Other

—

—

—

—

(1.9)

—
—
—

—
—
—

14.9
—
—
0.3
—
—
—
—

—
—
—

(0.6)
—
(0.5)

108.8
—
8.6
(0.3)
—
—
0.7
—

—
—
—

—
—
(0.2)

193.6
28.6
—
—
—
—
—
(6.3)

—
—
0.2

—
—
—

(48.6)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

(6.6)
—
—

Balance at December 31, 2016
Comprehensive income
Share-based compensation
Restricted stock awards
Restricted stock cancelled
Performance shares issued
Exercise of stock options
Dividends
Purchase of treasury stock (178,243

14,846,035
—
—
266,280
(2,000)
4,694
38,000
—

shares)

Acquisition adjustment
Other

—
—
—

Balance at December 31, 2017

15,153,009 $ 15.2 $

117.8 $ 216.1 $

(55.2)

$

(17.9)

$

12.0 $ 288.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44

(14.0)
(16.0)
—
—
—
—
—
—

—

—

(30.0)
(12.7)
—
—
—
—
—
—

—

—
—
—

(42.7)
24.8
—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—

$

6.3 $ 191.9
32.7
0.6
7.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.2
—
(6.3)
—

— (15.5)

—

6.9
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—

—

—
2.1
0.5

10.0
0.9
—
—
—
—
—
(0.6)

—
1.7
—

0.9

212.2
19.5
10.6
—
—
—
0.5
(6.2)

(1.9)

(0.6)
2.1
(0.2)

236.0
54.3
8.6
—
—
—
0.7
(6.9)

(6.6)
1.7
0.2

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Litigation settlement gain
Share-based compensation
Asset impairment charge
Deferred income taxes
Net impact of U.S. Tax Act

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid and other current assets
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Litigation settlement payment
Other noncurrent liabilities
Other

Net cash provided by operating activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

Net cash used by investing activities

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
(Payments on) proceeds from revolving credit facility, net
Payments on term loans and other debt
Proceeds from other long-term debt
Proceeds from (payments on) capital lease facilities, net
Issuance of 6.625% senior notes due 2027
Bank financing costs
Redemption of 8.125% senior notes due 2021
Premium on early extinguishment of debt
Dividends
Share repurchase program
Payments of withholding taxes on share awards
Other

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

Increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Income taxes paid
Interest paid

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

$

29.5

(In millions)
32.2

$

$

48.7

31.5
11.0
(3.3)
8.6
—
5.6
4.2

(25.1)
(19.0)
(4.4)
23.8
(4.0)
(4.3)
(7.4)

46.7

(27.9)
(39.7)

(67.6)

(8.1)
(31.3)
—
1.5
350.0
(7.6)
(250.0)
(8.0)
(6.9)
(4.2)
(2.4)
0.7

33.7
5.7

18.5
64.3

82.8

11.3
29.9

$

$
$

$

$
$

29.5
—
—
10.6
4.0
2.8
—

13.7
8.6
(5.5)
(8.8)
—
(8.1)
(6.1)

72.9

(28.5)
(23.4)

(51.9)

(36.2)
(4.5)
34.9
(1.2)
—
—
—
—
(6.2)
(0.1)
(1.8)
(2.1)

(17.2)
(1.5)

2.3
62.0

64.3

8.7
25.9

$

$
$

28.7
—
—
7.3
—
2.9
—

3.8
(15.4)
8.7
(36.9)
—
1.6
(4.7)

44.7

(36.5)
—

(36.5)

7.9
(3.6)
2.3
13.8
—
—
—
—
(6.3)
(10.2)
(5.3)
2.1

0.7
(4.9)

4.0
58.0

62.0

19.0
25.7

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

45

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

NOTE 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation and Basis of Presentation: Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (“ParkOhio,” “we” or the
“Company”) is a diversified international company providing world-class customers with a supply chain
management outsourcing service, capital equipment used on their production lines, and manufactured
components used to assemble their products. The Company operates through three reportable segments: Supply
Technologies, Assembly Components and Engineered Products. The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company does not have off-balance sheet arrangements
or financings with unconsolidated entities or other persons. The Company leases certain real properties owned by
related parties as described in Note 10. Transactions with related parties are not material to the Company’s
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Accounting Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months

or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Accounts receivable are recorded at net
realizable value. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectable in
the future. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $4.5 million and $4.0 million at December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectfully. The Company’s policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectability concerns based on
customers’ financial condition and payment history as well as a general reserve based on historical trends and
other information. During 2017 and 2016, we sold approximately $80.0 million and $81.6 million, respectively,
of accounts receivable to mitigate accounts receivable concentration risk and to provide additional financing
capacity. In compliance with ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing”, sales of accounts receivable are reflected as a
reduction of accounts receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds are included in cash flows
from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In 2017 and 2016, an expense in the
amount of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to the discount on sale of accounts receivable is
recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) cost or net realizable value.

Major Classes of Inventories

Finished goods
Work in process
Raw materials and supplies

Inventories, net

Other inventory items
Inventory reserves

Consigned Inventory

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

(In millions)

$

$

$

$

171.3
43.9
67.6

282.8

(29.8)

9.8

$

$

$

$

131.4
43.4
65.8

240.6

(30.2)

12.2

46

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost. Additions and

improvements that extend the lives of assets are capitalized, and expenditures for repairs and maintenance are
charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets, including capital leases, is
computed principally by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from
five to 40 years for buildings, and one to 20 years for machinery and equipment (with the majority in the range of
three to ten years).

The following table summarizes property, plant and equipment:

Property, plant and equipment:
Land and land improvements
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Leased property under capital leases

Total property, plant and equipment

Less accumulated depreciation

Property, plant and equipment, net

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

(In millions)

$

$

11.6
73.9
348.6
24.1

458.2
281.2

177.0

$

$

11.3
74.9
316.1
20.4

422.7
255.6

167.1

Information regarding depreciation expense of property, plant and equipment follows:

Depreciation expense

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

$

24.9

(In millions)
$

23.4

$

22.3

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Assets:

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350,
“Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are not amortized,
but rather are tested annually for impairment as of October 1, or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate there may be an indicator of impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Goodwill is tested for impairment at
the reporting unit level and is based on the net assets for each reporting unit, including goodwill and intangible
assets, compared to the fair value. Our reporting units have been identified at the component level. The Company
completed its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles impairment testing as of October 1 of each year,
noting no impairment. The Company uses an income approach, utilizing a discounted cash flow model based on
forecasted cash flows and weighted average cost of capital, and other valuation techniques to determine fair value.

See Notes 4 and 5 of the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure on goodwill and

indefinite-lived intangibles.

Impairment of Other Long-Lived Assets: Other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Upon indications of
impairment, assets and liabilities are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely
independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. The asset group would be considered impaired when
the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset group are less than its carrying value.

47

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Fair Values of Financial Instruments: Certain financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair
value. The Company measures financial assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels of inputs. The three-tier
fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is:

Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data.

Level 3 — Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with
reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant
judgment.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methods could affect the fair value estimates; however, we do not

believe any such changes would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and borrowings
under the Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 6) approximate fair value at December 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016 because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair values of long-term debt and
pension plan assets are disclosed in Note 6 and Note 11, respectively.

The Company has not changed its valuation techniques for measuring fair value during 2017, and there were

no transfers between levels during the periods presented.

Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting
and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax rates. In determining
these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration
factors including historical operating results, cumulative earnings and losses, expectations of future earnings,
taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid and
accordingly records valuation allowances if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized as required by ASC 740, “Income Taxes”
(“ASC 740”).

Share-Based Compensation: The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock

Compensation” (“ASC 718”), which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their grant date fair values.
Compensation expense for awards with service conditions only that are subject to graded vesting is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the term of the vesting period. Compensation expense of performance-based awards
is recognized as an expense over the vesting periods of the awards using the accelerated attribution method once
performance is deemed probable.

Under the provisions of the Company’s 2015 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (“2015 Plan”), which

is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, incentive stock options,
non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted share units, performance shares or
stock awards may be awarded to directors and all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 2015 Plan
replaces in its entirety the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (“1998 Plan”), but shares that remained

48

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

available under the 1998 Plan were added to the aggregate share limit under that 2015 Plan. Stock options will be
exercisable in whole or in installments as may be determined provided that no options will be exercisable more
than ten years from date of grant. The exercise price will be the fair value at the date of grant. The aggregate
number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be awarded under the 2015 Plan is 98,586.

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue, other than from long-term contracts, when title

is transferred to the customer, typically upon shipment. Revenue from long-term contracts is accounted for under
the percentage of completion method, and recognized on the basis of the percentage each contract’s cost to date
bears to the total estimated contract cost. We follow this method since reasonably reliable estimates of revenue
and costs of a contract can be made. Revenue earned on contracts in process that are in excess of billings is
classified as unbilled contract revenues in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and totaled
$40.1 million and $35.6 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Billings in excess of revenues
earned on contracts in process are classified in Other accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and
totaled $23.0 million and $22.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Cost of Sales: Cost of sales is primarily comprised of direct materials and supplies consumed in the
manufacture of product; manufacturing labor, depreciation expense and direct overhead expense; and shipping
and handling costs.

Concentration of Credit Risk: The Company sells its products to customers in diversified industries. The

Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition but does not require collateral
to support customer receivables. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors
surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. As of December 31,
2017, the Company had uncollateralized receivables with six customers in the automotive industry, each with
several locations, aggregating $42.7 million, which represented approximately 18% of the Company’s trade
accounts receivable. During 2017, sales to these customers amounted to approximately $291.3 million, which
represented approximately 21% of the Company’s net sales.

Environmental: The Company expenses environmental costs related to existing conditions resulting from
past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. Costs that extend the life of
the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company
records a liability when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and can be reasonably
estimated. The estimated liability of the Company is not reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers
and is undiscounted.

Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency for a majority of subsidiaries outside the United

States is the local currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end
exchange rates for assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates for revenues and expenses. The
resulting translation adjustments are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
shareholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translations, including intercompany
transactions that are not considered permanent investments, are included in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.

Warranties: The Company estimates the amount of warranty claims on sold products that may be incurred

based on current and historical data. The actual warranty expense could differ from the estimates made by the

49

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Company based on product performance. The following table presents the changes in the Company’s product
warranty liability:

Balance at January 1

Claims paid during the year
Warranty expense
Acquired warranty liabilities
Other

Balance at December 31

Year Ended December 31,

2017

7.1
(4.0)
4.7
0.1
—

7.9

$

$

$

$

2015

$

2016

(In millions)
6.1
(3.7)
2.0
2.8
(0.1)

7.1

$

6.9
(4.7)
4.0
—
(0.1)

6.1

Weighted-Average Number of Shares Used in Computing Earnings Per Share: The following table sets

forth the weighted-average number of shares used in the computation of earnings per share:

Weighted average basic shares outstanding
Plus dilutive impact of employee stock awards

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

12,211,978
243,963

12,455,941

(In whole shares)
12,126,264
148,188

12,274,452

12,215,425
167,526

12,382,951

Outstanding stock options with exercise prices greater than the average price of the common shares are anti-

dilutive and are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the year ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, the anti-dilutive shares were insignificant.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update

(“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-
Based Payment Accounting.” The ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based
payment transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding
requirements, as well as classification of related amounts within the statement of cash flows. The Company
adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017.

ASU 2016-09 requires prospective recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from share-

based compensation awards vesting and exercises be recognized as a discrete income tax adjustment in the
income statement. Previously, these amounts were recognized in Additional paid-in capital. In 2017, the
Company recognized income tax expense of $0.2 million for excess tax deficiencies upon vesting of awards. In
addition, ASU 2016-09 requires excess tax benefits and shortfalls to be prospectively excluded from the assumed
future proceeds in the calculation of diluted shares, resulting in an insignificant increase in diluted weighted
average shares outstanding for 2017 and an immaterial impact on earnings per share. ASU 2016-09 also requires
that excess tax benefits from share-based compensation awards be reported as operating activities in the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Previously, this activity was included in financing activities on the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company has elected to apply this change on a prospective basis.
This change has an immaterial impact on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Also, we elected to
continue to estimate forfeitures rather than account for them as they occur.

50

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):

Simplifying the Test for Goodwill impairment.” The amendments in the ASU simplify how an entity is required
to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The ASU is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted this
guidance for its October 1, 2017 impairment test.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, a comprehensive
new revenue recognition standard that will supersede existing guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of
the new standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange
for those goods or services. Our implementation efforts included the identification of revenue within the scope of
the standard, the evaluation of revenue contracts under the guidance, and assessing the impacts of the new
standard on our financial statements.

The new standard is effective for the Company for the first quarter of 2018, and we will utilize the modified

retrospective method of adoption. This method allows companies to record a one-time adjustment to beginning
retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 for the cumulative effect that the standard will have on open contracts at
the date of adoption. During our implementation, we identified certain contracts which will require over time
recognition under the new standard, either as goods are manufactured or services are performed, rather than at
the time of shipment or completion as we do under existing guidance. Upon adoption, we expect to accelerate
approximately $13 million to $17 million of revenue, resulting in a cumulative-effect adjustment of
approximately $2 million to $4 million to our 2018 beginning retained earnings.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10):
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in this update
address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The
Board also is addressing measurement of credit losses on financial assets in a separate project. This ASU is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early
adoption is not permitted. The new guidance will be applied prospectively and is expected to have an immaterial
impact on the financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The amendment establishes a
comprehensive new lease accounting model. The new standard: (a) clarifies the definition of a lease; (b) requires
a dual approach to lease classification similar to current lease classifications; and (c) causes lessees to recognize
leases on the balance sheet as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use asset for leases with a lease-term
of more than twelve months. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard requires a modified retrospective transition for capital or
operating leases existing at or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the
financial statements, but it does not require transition accounting for leases that expire prior to the date of initial
application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715),
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The
ASU requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other
compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The Company
will adopt this standard on the required date of January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of adopting this guidance.

51

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

No other recently issued ASUs are expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial

condition or liquidity.

NOTE 2 — Segments

The Company operates through three reportable segments: Supply Technologies, Assembly Components

and Engineered Products. Supply Technologies provides our customers with Total Supply Management™
services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. Assembly Components
manufactures cast aluminum components, automotive and industrial rubber and thermoplastic products, gasoline
direct injection systems, fuel filler and hydraulic assemblies for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction
equipment, heavy-duty truck and marine equipment industries, and also provides value-added services such as
design and engineering, machining and assembly. Engineered Products operates a diverse group of niche
manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products engineered for
specific customer applications.

For purposes of measuring business segment performance, the Company utilizes segment operating income,

which is defined as revenues less expenses identifiable to the product lines within each segment. The Company
does not allocate items that are non-operating; unusual in nature; or are corporate costs, which include but are not
limited to executive compensation and corporate office costs. Segment operating income reconciles to
consolidated income before income taxes by deducting corporate costs, certain non-cash charges and interest
expense.

Results by business segment were as follows:

Net sales:

Supply Technologies
Assembly Components
Engineered Products

Segment operating income:
Supply Technologies
Assembly Components
Engineered Products

Total segment operating income

Corporate costs
Asset impairment charge
Litigation settlement gains (judgment costs)

Operating income

Interest expense
Loss on extinguishment of debt

Income before income taxes

$

$

$

2017

561.8
524.5
326.6

1,412.9

45.9
50.4
20.7

117.0
(30.1)
—
3.3

90.2
(31.5)
(11.0)

Year Ended December 31,

2016

(In millions)

2015

$

$

$

$

$

$

502.1
529.4
245.4

1,276.9

40.0
50.5
10.6

101.1
(27.9)
(4.0)
—

69.2
(28.2)
—

578.7
569.2
315.9

1,463.8

50.3
57.9
20.9

129.1
(29.0)
—
(2.2)

97.9
(27.9)
—

70.0

$

47.7

$

41.0

$

52

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Capital expenditures:

Supply Technologies
Assembly Components
Engineered Products
Corporate

Depreciation and amortization expense:

Supply Technologies
Assembly Components
Engineered Products
Corporate

Identifiable assets:

Supply Technologies
Assembly Components
Engineered Products
Corporate

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(In millions)

2015

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

3.3
18.6
5.7
0.3

27.9

4.7
20.7
5.6
0.5

31.5

344.4
351.4
353.6
83.1

1,132.5

$

6.1
16.9
5.5
—

28.5

4.7
20.1
4.1
0.6

29.5

262.0
332.9
304.9
74.5

974.3

$

$

$

$

$

$

3.7
27.3
5.5
—

36.5

4.7
18.6
4.2
1.2

28.7

276.3
344.8
243.1
77.9

942.1

The percentage of net sales by product line included in each segment was as follows:

Supply Technologies:

Supply Technologies
Engineered specialty products

Assembly Components:

Fuel-related, rubber and plastic products
Aluminum products

Engineered Products:

Industrial equipment business
Forged and machined products

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

85%
15%

100%

70%
30%

100%

84%
16%

100%

85%
15%

100%

67%
33%

100%

79%
21%

100%

87%
13%

100%

59%
41%

100%

81%
19%

100%

53

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company’s approximate percentage of net sales by geographic region was as follows:

United States
Europe
Asia
Mexico
Canada
Other

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

2015

65%
10%
9%
8%
7%
1%

71%
8%
8%
6%
6%
1%

72%
7%
8%
6%
6%
1%

100%

100%

100%

The basis for attributing revenue to individual geographic regions is customer location.

At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, approximately 65%, 68% and 71%, respectively, of the Company’s

assets were located in the United States.

NOTE 3 — Acquisitions

On April 28, 2017, the Company acquired Aero-Missile Components Inc. (“AMC”). AMC, which is
included in our Supply Technologies segment, is a supply chain management business providing high-quality
specialty fasteners and other components to the defense and aerospace markets in the United States.

On October 3, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Heads & All Threads Ltd. (“HAT”). HAT,

which is included in our Supply Technologies segment, is a leading European supplier of supply chain
management services specializing in developing vendor-managed inventory programs of fasteners, machined
parts and other class C components to various industrial end markets.

On December 29, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of an injection molding business. The
acquisition, which is included in our Assembly Components segment, is a manufacturer of precision-molded
rubber components for several industrial markets.

The results of operations of the 2017 acquisitions are included our consolidated results from their respective

acquisition dates. Collectively, the 2017 acquisitions contributed $18.5 million of sales for the year ended
December 31, 2017.

The combined purchase price of the 2017 acquisitions was $39.7 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase
price allocations for the 2017 acquisitions are preliminary as of December 31, 2017, subject to finalization of the
Company’s determination of the value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which is expected to be
completed as soon as practicable but no later than twelve months after the respective acquisition dates. Goodwill
of $8.4 million and intangibles of $2.0 million are recorded in the December 31, 2017 consolidated balance sheet
related to the 2017 acquisitions.

In December 2016, the Company acquired all the outstanding capital stock of GH Electrotermia S.A. (“GH”),
headquartered in Valencia, Spain, for $23.4 million in cash (net of $6.3 million cash acquired), plus the assumption
of $13.9 million in debt. The Company finalized its valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during
2017. The purchase agreement stipulated potential contingent consideration of up to $2.1 million based on
achievement of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) targets for 2016 and
2017. The EBITDA targets were not achieved, and therefore no contingent consideration was paid to the seller.

54

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 4 — Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment are as follows:

Supply Technologies Assembly Components Engineered Products

Total

Balance at January 1, 2015
Acquisition adjustments
Foreign currency translation

$

Balance at December 31, 2015

GH acquisition
Foreign currency translation

Balance at December 31, 2016
Acquisitions and adjustments
Foreign currency translation

$

7.6
—
(0.4)

7.2
—
(1.1)

6.1
8.4
0.9

(In millions)
$

54.0
0.1
—

54.1
—
—

54.1
—
—

$

27.9
(6.3)
(0.9)

20.7
6.1
(0.4)

26.4
1.5
2.8

89.5
(6.2)
(1.3)

82.0
6.1
(1.5)

86.6
9.9
3.7

Balance at December 31, 2017

$

15.4

$

54.1

$

30.7

$

100.2

A portion of the goodwill associated with the GH acquisition is deductible for income tax purposes.

Goodwill associated with the 2017 acquisitions is not deductible for income tax purposes.

NOTE 5 — Other Intangible Assets

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Weighted Average
Useful Life
(Years)

Gross Value

Accumulated
Amortization Net Value Gross Value

Accumulated
Amortization Net Value

9.2

$

83.4 $

29.3 $

(In millions)
54.1 $

75.5 $

23.7 $

51.8

*
17.5
7.2

23.7
23.6
4.1

*
3.0
3.0

23.7
20.6
1.1

22.4
23.0
4.0

*
1.8
2.8

$

134.8 $

35.3 $

99.5 $

124.9 $

28.3 $

22.4
21.2
1.2

96.6

Customer relationships
Indefinite-lived
tradenames

Technology
Other

Total

* Not applicable, as these tradenames have an indefinite life.

As part of HAT acquisition, we acquired approximately $2.0 million of customer relationships. As described

in Note 3, the fair value of this intangible asset is subject to finalization of its fair value analysis, expected to be
completed not later than twelve months after the acquisition date.

As part of the GH acquisition, we acquired approximately $3.6 million of customer relationships, $4.8 million

of tradenames and $6.5 million of technology.

Amortization expense of other intangible assets follows:

Amortization expense

55

Year Ended December 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

6.6

(In millions)
6.1
$

$

6.4

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

We estimate amortization expense for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2017 as follows:

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022

NOTE 6 — Financing Arrangements

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(In millions)

6.8
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.2

$
$
$
$
$

Senior Notes due 2027
Senior Notes due 2021
Revolving credit facility
Term loan
Industrial Equipment Group European

Facilities
Capital leases
Other

Gross debt

Less: current portion of long-term debt
Less: short-term debt
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs

Total long-term debt, net

Maturity Date

Interest Rate at
December 31, 2017

December 31,
2017

December 31,
2016

Carrying Value at

$

April 15, 2027
April 1, 2021
April 17, 2022

December 21, 2021
Various
Various

6.625%
8.125%
3.30%

3.25%
Various
Various

(In millions)

$

350.0
—
124.7
—

27.0
20.3
19.9

541.9
(15.4)
(2.3)
(8.7)

$

515.5

$

—
250.0
132.8
23.4

26.4
18.8
23.6

475.0
(25.8)
(5.0)
(5.2)

439.0

On April 17, 2017, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (“Park-Ohio”), the operating subsidiary of Park-Ohio
Holdings Corp., completed the issuance, in a private placement, of $350.0 million aggregate principal amount
of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2027 (the “Notes”). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on
April 15 and October 15 of each year, and the Notes mature on April 15, 2027. The Notes are unsecured senior
obligations of Park-Ohio and are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by the 100% owned material domestic
subsidiaries of Park-Ohio. Proceeds from the Notes issuance were used to repay in full the previously-
outstanding 8.125% Senior Notes due 2021 in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million, the term loan
and a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

The Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all material 100% owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company.
Provisions of the indenture governing the Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement contain restrictions on the
Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain
payments, investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of assets or
to merge or consolidate with an unaffiliated entity. At December 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with
all financial covenants of the Credit Agreement.

56

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

On April 17, 2017, Park-Ohio also entered into a seventh amended and restated credit agreement (the

“Amended Credit Agreement”) with a group of banks to increase the revolving credit facility
to $350.0 million and extend the maturity date of borrowings under the facility to April 17, 2022. Furthermore,
Park-Ohio has the option, pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement, to increase the availability under the
revolving credit facility by an aggregate incremental amount up to $100.0 million. As of December 31, 2017,
$112.7 million was borrowed on the U.S. portion of the facility; $12.0 million of an available $25.0 million was
borrowed on the European sub-limit portion of the facility; and the Company had approximately $194.2 million
of unused borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility. None of the available $35.0 million of the
Canadian sub-limit has been borrowed as of December 31, 2017.

In connection with the April 2017 repurchase of Senior Notes due 2021 and amendment of our credit
agreement, we recorded an $11.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt, representing premiums paid on early
extinguishment of $8.0 million, the write-off of unamortized prior debt issuance costs of $2.5 million, and related
fees and expenses of $0.5 million.

On December 21, 2016, the Company, through its subsidiary, IEGE Industrial Equipment Holding Company

Limited, entered into a financing agreement with Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. The financing
agreement provides the Company a loan up to $27.0 million as of December 31, 2017, as well as a revolving
credit facility for up to $12.1 million to fund working capital and general corporate needs. The full $27.0 million
loan is outstanding as of December 31, 2017. No amounts have been drawn on the revolving credit facility as of
December 31, 2017.

On October 21, 2015, the Company, through its subsidiary, Southwest Steel Processing LLC, entered into a
financing agreement with the Arkansas Development Finance Authority. The agreement provides the Company
the ability to borrow up to $11.0 million for expansion of its manufacturing facility in Arkansas. The loan
matures in September 2025. The Company has borrowed $5.3 million under this agreement as of December 31,
2017.

On August 13, 2015, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”). The

Lease Agreement provides the Company up to $50.0 million for capital leases. Capital lease obligations of
$20.3 million were borrowed under the Lease Agreement as of December 31, 2017 to acquire machinery and
equipment. See Note 10 for additional disclosure.

The following table represents fair value information of the Notes, classified as Level 1, at December 31,

2017 and 2016. The fair value was estimated using quoted market prices.

Carrying amount
Fair value

December 31, 2017

(In millions)

$
$

350.0
380.6

Maturities of short-term and long-term debt, excluding capital leases, during each of the five years

subsequent to December 31, 2017 are as follows:

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022

57

(In millions)

8.6
9.8
9.5
15.3
125.9

$
$
$
$
$

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Foreign subsidiaries of the Company had $40.2 million of borrowings at December 31, 2017 and
$42.4 million at December 31, 2016, and outstanding bank guarantees of approximately $15.1 million at
December 31, 2017 under their credit arrangements.

The weighted average interest rate on all debt was 6.11% at December 31, 2017 and 6.10% at December 31,

2016.

NOTE 7 — Income Taxes

Income before income taxes consists of the following:

$

$

$

United States
Outside the United States

Income taxes consists of the following:

Current expense (benefit):

Federal
State
Foreign

Deferred expense (benefit):

Federal
State
Foreign

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(In millions)

2015

21.4
26.3

47.7

$

$

15.4
25.6

41.0

$

$

44.0
26.0

70.0

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(In millions)

2015

14.3
0.7
7.6

22.6

(5.4)
0.3
0.7

(4.4)

$

$

(0.8)
0.2
6.6

6.0

1.6
0.5
0.7

2.8

8.8

$

11.7
0.7
6.0

18.4

2.7
0.6
(0.4)

2.9

21.3

Income tax expense

$

18.2

$

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “U.S. Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Tax Act reduces

the US federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on
earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreign
sourced earnings.

The SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act.
SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment
date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must
reflect the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Act for which the accounting under ASC 740 is
complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete
but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the
financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial

58

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect
immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act.

At December 31, 2017, we have not completed our accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Tax

Act; however, in certain cases, as described below, we have made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our
existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax. For the items for which we were able to determine
a reasonable estimate, we recognized a net provisional amount of $4.2 million, which is included as a component
of income tax expense. In all cases, we will continue to make and refine our calculations as additional analysis is
completed. In addition, our estimates may also be affected as we gain a more thorough understanding of the tax
law.

Provisional amounts

Deferred tax assets and liabilities: We remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the
rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. However, we are still analyzing
certain aspects of the Act and refining our calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these
balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the
remeasurement of our deferred tax balance was a tax benefit of $10.0 million.

The one-time transition tax is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P) that we previously
deferred from US income taxes. We recorded a provisional amount for our one-time transition tax liability for
each of our foreign subsidiaries, resulting in an increase in income tax expense of $14.2 million. We have not yet
completed our calculation of the total post-1986 E&P for these foreign subsidiaries. Further, the transition tax is
based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets. This amount may change
when we finalize the calculation of post-1986 foreign E&P previously deferred from US federal taxation and
finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets.

A reconciliation of income tax expense computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to

income before income taxes as recorded is as follows:

Tax at U.S. statutory rate
Effect of state income taxes, net
Effect of foreign operations
Valuation allowance
Uncertain tax positions
Non-deductible items
Non-deductible compensation
Manufacturer’s deduction
Net impact of U.S. Tax Act
Other, net

Total

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(In millions)

2015

$

$

16.7
0.7
(5.2)
5.3
(2.0)
0.5
0.4
(0.8)
4.2
(1.6)

$

14.3
0.2
(2.1)
0.5
(4.0)
0.6
0.8
(0.5)
—
(1.0)

$

18.2

$

8.8

$

24.5
0.6
(1.6)
(0.7)
0.1
0.5
1.2
(1.1)
—
(2.2)

21.3

59

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

Deferred income tax assets:

Postretirement benefit obligation
Inventory
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards
Warranty reserve
Accrued litigation
Compensation
Other

Total deferred income tax assets

Deferred income tax liabilities:

Depreciation and amortization
Pension
Intangible assets
Other

Total deferred income tax liabilities

Net deferred income tax liabilities prior to valuation allowances
Valuation allowances

Year Ended December 31,

2017

2016

(In millions)

$

$

2.0
9.9
16.1
0.4
0.1
4.2
4.8

37.5

9.7
16.3
16.6
2.8

45.4

(7.9)
(11.6)

Net deferred income tax liability

$

(19.5)

$

3.6
13.7
10.8
2.1
2.8
4.1
10.0

47.1

14.9
22.1
23.3
5.2

65.5

(18.4)
(5.3)

(23.7)

At December 31, 2017, the Company has U.S., state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards and U.S.

foreign tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes. The foreign net operating loss carryforward is
$32.4 million, of which $7.9 million expires between 2018 and 2037 and the remainder has no expiration date.
The Company has a tax benefit from a state net operating loss carryforward of $2.1 million that expires between
2018 and 2037. The Company also has a tax benefit from a non-consolidated U.S. net operating loss
carryforward of $1.1 million that expires between 2035 and 2036. The foreign tax credit carryforward is
$3.1 million and expires in 2027.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was not in a cumulative three-year loss position and it
was determined that it was more likely than not that its U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized. During the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded valuation allowances of $6.3 million and
$4.5 million, respectively, against certain foreign net deferred tax assets and the U.S. foreign tax credits. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income (including
reversals of deferred tax liabilities). The Company reviews all valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets
and will reverse these valuation allowances, partially or totally, when appropriate under ASC 740.

60

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

2017

2016

(In millions)

2015

Unrecognized Tax Benefit — January 1,
Gross Increases to Tax Positions Related to Current Year
Gross Increases to Tax Positions Related to Prior Years
Gross Decreases to Tax Positions Related to Prior Years
Gross Decreases Related to Settlements with Taxing

$

Authorities

Expiration of Statute of Limitations
Other

$

2.9
0.1
0.6
—

(0.4)
(1.9)
(0.1)

$

6.3
—
0.3
—

—
(3.7)
—

Unrecognized Tax Benefit — December 31,

$

1.2

$

2.9

$

6.5
—
0.3
(0.1)

—
(0.4)
—

6.3

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is
$0.9 million at December 31, 2017 and $2.4 million at December 31, 2016. The Company recognizes accrued
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. During the year ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized approximately $(0.3) million and $(1.4) million,
respectively, in net interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the
payment of interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. It is reasonably possible
that within the next twelve months the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by
approximately $0.1 million as a result of the closure of tax statutes related to existing uncertain tax positions.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s
tax years for 2014 through 2017 remain open for examination by the Internal Revenue Service and 2013 through
2017 remain open for examination by various state and foreign taxing authorities.

As a result of the Tax Act, the Company’s net unremitted foreign earnings of $136.0 million have been

subject to U.S. taxation. We are currently analyzing our global working capital and cash requirements and the
potential tax liabilities attributable to a repatriation, including calculating any excess of the amount for financial
reporting over the tax basis in our foreign subsidiaries, but we have yet to determine whether we plan to change
our prior assertion and repatriate earnings. Accordingly, we have not recorded any deferred taxes attributable to
our investments in our foreign subsidiaries. We will record the tax effects of any change in our prior assertion in
the period that we complete our analysis and are able to make a reasonable estimate, and disclose any
unrecognized deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to our foreign investments, if practicable.

61

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 8 — Share-Based Compensation

A summary of stock option activity for 2017 is presented below:

Outstanding — beginning of year

Granted
Exercised
Canceled or expired

Outstanding — end of year

Options exercisable

2017

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(in millions)

19.30
—
19.30
—

—

—

0.0

0.0

$

$

—

—

Number
of Shares

(in whole shares)
38,000
—
(38,000)
—

$

— $

— $

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock

options were $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

A summary of restricted share and performance share activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as

follows:

Time-Based

Performance-Based

2017

Number of
Shares

(in whole shares)
216,916
105,670
(87,727)
110,000
(2,000)

$

342,859

$

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

36.94
38.48
44.78
34.78
37.87

34.71

Number of
Shares

(in whole shares)
165,000
165,000
(55,000)
(110,000)
—

$

165,000

$

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

34.78
38.10
34.78
34.78
—

38.10

Outstanding — beginning of year
Granted (a)
Vested
Performance- to time-based (b)
Canceled or expired

Outstanding — end of year

Included in the granted amount are 4,390 restricted share units.

(a)
(b) During the second quarter of 2017, 55,000 of the performance-based restricted shares granted in 2016 fully
vested based on achievement of the performance criteria. In accordance with the grant agreements, the
remaining 110,000 shares became time-based, vesting over the remaining two years of the requisite service
period.

The Company recognized compensation expense of $8.6 million, $10.6 million and $7.3 million for the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to time-based shares and performance-
based shares.

62

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The total fair value of restricted shares and share units that vested during the years ended December 31,

2017, 2016 and 2015 was $7.0 million, $5.1 million and $9.0 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $9.3 million related
restricted shares. The unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a total weighted
average period of 1.7 years.

The number of shares available for future grants for all plans at December 31, 2017 is 98,586.

NOTE 9 — Commitments, Contingencies and Litigation Settlement

The Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. Although the Company cannot precisely predict the amount of any liability that may ultimately arise
with respect to any of these matters, the Company records provisions when it considers the liability probable and
reasonably estimable. Our provisions are based on historical experience and legal advice, reviewed quarterly and
adjusted according to developments. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of multiple forecasted
factors that often depend on judgments about potential actions by third parties, such as regulators, courts, and
state and federal legislatures. Changes in the amounts of our loss provisions, which can be material, affect our
financial condition. Due to the inherent uncertainties in the process undertaken to estimate potential losses, we
are unable to estimate an additional range of loss in excess of our accruals. While it is reasonably possible that
such excess liabilities, if they were to occur, could be material to operating results in any given quarter or year of
their recognition, we do not believe that it is reasonably possible that such excess liabilities would have a
material adverse effect on our long-term results of operations, liquidity or consolidated financial position.

Our subsidiaries are involved in a number of contractual and warranty related disputes. At this time, we

cannot reasonably determine the probability of a loss, and the timing and amount of loss, if any, cannot be
reasonably estimated. We believe that appropriate liabilities for these contingencies have been recorded;
however, actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

IPSCO Tubulars Inc. d/b/a TMK IPSCO sued Ajax Tocco Magnethermic Corporation (“ATM”), a
subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corporation, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Arkansas claiming that equipment supplied by ATM for heat treating certain steel pipe at IPSCO’s Blytheville,
Arkansas facility did not perform as required by the contract. The complaint alleged causes of action for breach
of contract, gross negligence and constructive fraud. IPSCO sought approximately $10.0 million in damages plus
an unspecified amount of punitive damages. In September 2013, the district court issued a judgment in favor of
IPSCO in the amount of $5.2 million, which the Company recognized and accrued for at that time. In March
2016, the district court issued an order granting, in part, IPSCO’s motion for fees and costs and awarding
$2.2 million to IPSCO, which the Company accrued for as of December 31, 2015. ATM filed a third appeal of
that decision. On March 28, 2017, the Company and IPSCO agreed to a settlement and release of all claims for
the payment by the Company of $4.0 million to IPSCO, which was made in March 2017. As of the settlement
date, the Company had $7.3 million accrued for this matter. The Company reversed the excess liability and
recognized $3.3 million in income in the first quarter of 2017.

In August 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the staff of the Securities and Exchange

Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the staff’s investigation of a third party. At that time, the Company also
learned that the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) is conducting a criminal investigation of the third party. In
connection with its initial response to the staff’s subpoena, the Company disclosed to the staff of the SEC that, in
November 2007, the third party participated in a payment on behalf of the Company to a foreign tax official that

63

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

implicates the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The Board of Directors of the Company formed a special
committee to review the Company’s transactions with the third party and to make any recommendations to the
Board of Directors with respect thereto. The Company intends to cooperate fully with the SEC and the DOJ in
connection with their investigations of the third party and with the SEC in light of the Company’s disclosure. The
Company is unable to predict the outcome or impact of the special committee’s investigation or the length, scope
or results of the SEC’s review or the impact on its results of operations.

NOTE 10 — Lease Arrangements

Future minimum lease commitments during each of the five years following December 31, 2017 and

thereafter are as follows:

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter

Total minimum lease payments

Amounts representing interest

Present value of minimum lease payments
Current maturities

Long-term capital lease obligation

(In millions)
Capital Leases Operating leases

17.8
13.5
8.9
5.8
4.8
13.3

64.1

$

$

$

9.4
5.9
4.3
1.3
0.1
—

21.0

$

(0.7)

20.3
(9.1)

11.2

Rental expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $19.4 million, $18.5 million and $19.7 million, respectively.

Certain of the Company’s leases are with related parties at an annual rental expense of approximately
$2.2 million. Transactions with related parties are not material to the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

Assets recorded under capital leases are included in property, plant and equipment and consist of the

following:

Machinery and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

$

$

(In millions)
24.1
(4.7)

$

19.4

$

20.4
(2.3)

18.1

Amortization of machinery and equipment under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.

64

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 11 — Pensions and Postretirement Benefits

The Company and its subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or
noncontributory defined contribution plans, covering substantially all employees. In addition, the Company has
an unfunded postretirement benefit plan. One of its defined benefit plans, covering most U.S. employees not
covered by collective bargaining agreements, utilizes a cash balance formula. Under a cash balance formula, a
plan participant accumulates a retirement benefit consisting of pay credits that are based upon a percentage of
current eligible earnings and current interest credits. For the remaining defined benefit plans, benefits are based
on the employee’s years of service. For the defined contribution plans, the costs charged to operations and the
amount funded are based upon a percentage of the covered employees’ compensation.

The Company’s objective for the pension plan is to monitor the funded ratio; create general investment

goals in regards to acceptable risk and liquidity needs ensuring the long-term interests of participants and
beneficiaries are considered; and manage risk by minimizing the short-term and long-term risk of actual expenses
and contribution requirements.

The following tables set forth the changes in benefit obligation, plan assets, funded status and amounts
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial losses (gains)
Benefits and expenses paid

Benefit obligation at end of year

Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions
Cash transfer to fund postretirement benefit

payments

Benefits and expenses paid

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

Funded (underfunded) status of the plans

Pension Benefits

Postretirement Benefits

2017

2016

2017

2016

(In millions)

$

$

$

$

$

58.5
2.4
1.8
2.4
(4.6)

60.5

120.2
20.2
—

(1.0)
(4.6)

134.8

74.3

$

$

$

$

$

58.4
2.4
1.8
0.5
(4.6)

58.5

117.3
8.3
—

(0.8)
(4.6)

120.2

61.7

$

$

$

$

$

$

10.0
—
0.3
0.5
(1.5)

9.3

$

— $
—
1.5

—
(1.5)

— $

13.5
—
0.3
(2.6)
(1.2)

10.0

—
—
1.2

—
(1.2)

—

(9.3)

$

(10.0)

65

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

Pension assets
Other current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities

Amounts recognized in Accumulated other

comprehensive loss

Net actuarial loss
Net prior service cost (credit)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Pension Benefits

Postretirement Benefits

2017

2016

2017

2016

$

$

$

$

74.3
—
—

74.3

16.5
0.3

16.8

$

$

$

$

$

(In millions)
61.7
—
—

61.7

$

— $
1.1
8.2

9.3

$

25.8
0.3

26.1

$

$

2.1
(0.1)

2.0

$

$

—
1.2
8.8

10.0

1.7
(0.2)

1.5

The pension plan weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2017 and 2016 and target allocation for

2018 are as follows:

Asset Category
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other

Plan Assets

Target 2018

2017

2016

45-75%
20-40%
0-20%

100%

65.0%
23.6%
11.4%

100%

61.9%
24.6%
13.5%

100%

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the pension plans assets:

Common stock
Equity securities
Foreign stock
U.S. Government obligations
Fixed income securities
Corporate Bonds
Cash and cash equivalents

Total

Investments measured at net asset value:
Common collective trusts
Hedge funds

2017

2016

Level 1

Total (at Fair Value)

Level 1

Total (at Fair Value)

$

41.8
39.8
7.3
5.8
13.7
10.2
1.4

$

120.0

(In millions)

$

$

40.0
29.0
5.4
8.1
14.1
6.3
3.3

$

106.2

$

41.8
39.8
7.3
5.8
13.7
10.2
1.4

0.7
14.1

40.0
29.0
5.4
8.1
14.1
6.3
3.3

1.1
12.9

Total assets at fair value

$

134.8

$

120.2

66

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Valuation Methodologies: Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for pension plan

assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2017 and
2016.

Common stock, equity securities and foreign stock — These securities consist of direct investments in the

stock of publicly-traded companies. Such investments are valued based on the closing price reported in an active
market on which the individual securities are traded. As such, the direct investments are classified as Level 1.

U.S. Government obligations, fixed income securities and corporate bonds — Valued at the closing price of

each security.

Cash equivalents — Consists of primarily money market funds and certificates of deposit, for which book

value equals fair value.

Common collective trusts — Valued at the net unit value of units held by the trust at year end. The unit
value is determined by the total value of fund assets divided by the total number of units of the fund owned. The
equity investments in collective trusts are predominantly in index funds for which the underlying securities are
actively traded in public markets based upon readily measurable prices. Common collective trusts are measured
at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value
hierarchy and are being presented in the tables above to permit a reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the
total plan assets.

Hedge funds — Consists of direct investments in hedge funds through limited partnership interests. Net
asset values are based on the estimated fair value of the ownership interest in the investment as determined by the
General Partner. The majority of the holdings of the hedge funds are in equity securities traded on public
exchanges. The investment terms of the hedge funds allow capital to be redeemed quarterly given prior notice
with certain limitations. Hedge funds measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical
expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy and are being presented in the tables above to
permit a reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the total plan assets.

For additional information regarding fair value measurements, see Note 1.

67

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following tables summarize the assumptions used in the valuation of pension and postretirement benefit

obligations at December 31 and the measurement of the net periodic benefit cost in the following year. The
Company used a spot rate approach by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant
projected cash flows in the estimation of the service and interest components of benefit cost.

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at

year-end
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
Health care cost trend rate
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year of ultimate trend rate
Assumptions used to determine expense
Discount rate for benefit obligations
Discount rate for service costs
Discount rate for interest costs
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Medical health care benefits rate increase
Medical drug benefits rate increase
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year of ultimate trend rate

Weighted-Average assumptions as of December 31,

Pension Benefits

Postretirement Benefits

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

3.52% 3.91% 4.13%
3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A

3.90% 4.13% 3.82%
3.98% 4.20% 3.82%
3.20% 3.27% 3.82%
8.25% 8.25% 8.25%
3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

3.32%
N/A
6.50%
5.00%
2025

3.61%
4.24%
2.90%
N/A
N/A
6.50%
6.50%
5.00%
2025

3.63%
N/A
6.50%
5.00%
2025

3.76%
4.44%
2.89%
N/A
N/A
6.50%
6.50%
5.00%
2025

3.80%
N/A
6.75%
5.00%
2022

3.60%
3.60%
3.60%
N/A
N/A
6.75%
6.75%
5.00%
2022

68

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

In determining its expected return on plan assets assumption for the year ended December 31, 2017, the
Company considered historical experience, its asset allocation, expected future long-term rates of return for each
major asset class, and an assumed long-term inflation rate. This assumption was supported by the asset return
generation model, which projected future asset returns using simulation and asset class correlation.

Pension Benefits

Postretirement Benefits

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

(In millions)

Components of net periodic benefit

cost

Service costs
Interest costs
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost

(credit)

Recognized net actuarial loss

$

$

2.4
1.8
(9.7)

—
1.2

2.4
1.8
(9.4)

—
1.1

$

$

2.6
2.3
(10.2)

— $
0.3
—

— $
0.3
—

—
0.3

(0.1)
0.1

(0.1)
0.1

Benefit (income) costs

$

(4.3)

$

(4.1)

$

(5.0)

$

0.3

$

0.3

$

—
0.6
—

(0.1)
0.5

1.0

Other changes in plan assets and

benefit obligations recognized in
accumulated other
comprehensive (income) loss

AOCI at beginning of year
Net (loss) gain arising during the year
Recognition of prior service credit
Recognition of actuarial loss

Total recognized in accumulated

other comprehensive loss at end
of year

$

$

26.1
(1.1)
—
(8.2)

$

25.5
1.7
—
(1.1)

$

15.7
10.1
—
(0.3)

$

1.5
0.5
0.1
(0.1)

$

4.1
(2.6)
0.1
(0.1)

7.2
(2.7)
0.1
(0.5)

$

16.8

$

26.1

$

25.5

$

2.0

$

1.5

$

4.1

The estimated net loss, prior service cost and net transition obligation for the defined benefit pension plans

that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the year
ending December 31, 2018 is $0.3 million.

The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the postretirement plans that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the year ending December 31, 2018
is less than $0.1 million.

69

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Below is a table summarizing the Company’s expected future benefit payments and the expected payments

due to Medicare subsidy over the next ten years:

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023 to 2027

Pension Benefits

Gross

Postretirement Benefits

Expected
Medicare Subsidy

Net including
Medicare Subsidy

$

$

5.1
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.4
22.8

$

(In millions)
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
3.6

$

1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
3.2

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4

The Company expects to make no contributions to its defined benefit plans in 2018 and beyond, as pension
benefits are expected to be paid out of plan assets and postretirement benefits are paid directly by the Company.

Under the postretirement benefit plan, health care benefits are provided on both a contributory and

noncontributory basis. The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A
one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2017
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2017

1-Percentage
Point
Increase

1-Percentage
Point
Decrease

$
$

(In millions)
— $
$
0.6

—
(0.6)

In January 2008, a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for the Company’s Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company. The SERP provides an annual supplemental retirement benefit for up to $0.4 million upon the CEO’s
termination of employment with the Company. The vested retirement benefit will be equal to a percentage of the
SERP that is equal to the ratio of: (1) his credited service with the Company prior to January 1, 2008 (up to a
maximum of thirteen years), plus his credited service after January 1, 2008 (up to a maximum of seven years); to
(2) twenty years of credited service. In the event of a change in control before the CEO’s termination of
employment, he will receive 100% of the SERP. The Company recorded income of $0.2 million in 2017 and
2016 and expense of $0.6 million in 2015 related to the SERP.

70

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 12 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended

December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were as follows:

Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment

Pension and
Postretirement
Benefits

(In millions)

Total

Balance at January 1, 2015

$

Foreign currency translation adjustments (a)
Pension and OPEB activity, net of tax adjustments (b)

Balance at December 31, 2015

Foreign currency translation adjustments (a)
Pension and OPEB activity, net of tax adjustments (b)

Balance at December 31, 2016

Foreign currency translation adjustments (a)
Pension and OPEB activity, net of tax adjustments (b)

$

(5.1)
(11.8)
—

(16.9)
(13.9)
—

(30.8)
19.2
—

$

(8.9)
—
(4.2)

(13.1)
—
1.2

(11.9)
—
5.6

Balance at December 31, 2017

$

(11.6)

$

(6.3)

$

(14.0)
(11.8)
(4.2)

(30.0)
(13.9)
1.2

(42.7)
19.2
5.6

(17.9)

(a) No income taxes are provided on foreign currency translation adjustments as foreign earnings are

considered permanently invested.

(b) The tax adjustments are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in

income tax expense.

NOTE 13 — Subsequent Events

On January 31, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.125 per
common share. The dividend was paid on March 1, 2018, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on
February 15, 2018 and resulted in a cash outlay of approximately $1.6 million.

On February 1, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Canton Drop Forge, Inc. (“CDF”). CDF is

headquartered in Canton, Ohio and will be part of our Forged and Machined Products group within the
Engineered Products segment. CDF manufactures forgings for high-performance applications in the international
aerospace and other markets.

71

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 14 — Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

2017
Net sales
Gross profit
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to ParkOhio common shareholders

Earnings per common share attributable to ParkOhio common

shareholders:
Basic

Diluted

Cash dividends per common share

2016
Net sales
Gross profit
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to ParkOhio common shareholders

Earnings per common share attributable to ParkOhio common

shareholders:
Basic

Diluted

Cash dividends per common share

Quarter Ended

Mar. 31

Jun. 30

Sept. 30

Dec. 31

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

343.8
55.5
10.1
(0.3)
9.8

0.80

0.79

0.125

328.0
47.8
2.7
—
2.7

0.22

0.22

0.125

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

350.9
60.3
3.2
(0.2)
3.0

0.25

0.24

0.125

329.4
54.3
9.0
—
9.0

0.74

0.73

0.125

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

352.2
57.2
10.2
(0.2)
10.0

0.82

0.80

0.125

312.7
54.3
13.8
(0.3)
13.5

1.12

1.10

0.125

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

366.0
61.6
6.0
(0.2)
5.8

0.48

0.46

0.125

306.8
46.6
6.7
(0.2)
6.5

0.53

0.53

0.125

Income of $3.3 million from the reversal of a litigation reserve was recorded in the first quarter of 2017 in

conjunction with the settlement of the IPSCO legal matter.

A loss on extinguishment of debt of $11.0 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2017 in connection

with the April 2017 repurchase of Senior Notes due 2021 and amendment of our credit agreement.

Income tax expense of $4.2 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 from the net impact of the

U.S. Tax Act.

An asset impairment charge of $4.0 million was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 due to the accelerated

end of production in certain programs with an automotive customer.

72

Supplementary Financial Data

Schedule II

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

Description

Year Ended December 31, 2017:
Allowances deducted from assets:
Trade receivable allowances
Inventory reserves
Tax valuation allowances
Year Ended December 31, 2016:
Allowances deducted from assets:
Trade receivable allowances
Inventory reserves
Tax valuation allowances
Year Ended December 31, 2015:
Allowances deducted from assets:
Trade receivable allowances
Inventory reserves
Tax valuation allowances

Balance at
Beginning of
Period

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

Deductions
and
Other

Balance at
End of
Period

(In millions)

$

$

$

4.0
30.2
5.3

3.3
29.0
4.8

4.1
29.9
7.1

$

$

1.5
5.6
5.6

1.5
6.0
0.5

0.4
4.2
(0.7)

$

$

$

$

$

(1.0) (A)
(6.0) (B)
0.7 (C)

(0.8) (A)
(4.8) (B)
— (C)

(1.2) (A)
(5.1) (B)
(1.6) (C)

4.5
29.8
11.6

4.0
30.2
5.3

3.3
29.0
4.8

Note (A)- Uncollectable accounts written off, net of recoveries.

Note (B)- Amounts written off.

Note (C)- Amounts accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.

73

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with

the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Based upon this evaluation, our Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial

reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. As required by Rule 13a-15(c)
under the Exchange Act, management carried out an evaluation, with participation of our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The framework on which such evaluation was based is
contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the “COSO Report”).
Management’s assessment and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of AMC, HAT and the acquired injection molding business, which constituted
approximately five percent of the Company’s total assets as of December 31, 2017 and approximately 1% of the
Company’s total revenues, for the year then ended. Based upon the evaluation described above under the
framework contained in the COSO Report, our management has concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, who audited the consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2017, also audited the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting, excluding AMC, HAT and the acquired injection molding
business. Their report is set forth on pages 37 - 38 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated by
reference into this Item 9A.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth

quarter of 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

74

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information concerning directors, the identification of the audit committee and the audit committee
financial expert and our code of ethics required under this item is incorporated herein by reference from the
material contained under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance,” as applicable, in our
definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year (the “Proxy Statement”). The information
concerning Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance is incorporated herein by reference from the
material contained under the caption “Principal Shareholders — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance” in the Proxy Statement. Information relating to executive officers is contained in Part I of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information relating to executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee

report contained under the heading “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference. The information relating to compensation committee interlocks contained under the heading
“Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference from the material contained

under the caption “Principal Shareholders” in the Proxy Statement, except that information required by
Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K can be found below.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material contained under

the captions “Corporate Governance Director Independence” and “Transactions With Related Persons” in the
Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference to the material contained under

the caption “Audit Committee — Independent Auditor Fee Information” in the Proxy Statement.

75

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Income — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and

2015

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) — Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is included in

Item 8:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying accounts

Page

39
40
41
42

43
44
45
46
72

73

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not

required under the related instructions or are not applicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

(3) Exhibits:

Exhibit

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended
December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a
part hereof)

Code of Regulations of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134
and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Indenture, dated April 17, 2017, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as
defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (including Form of
Note) (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on April 17,
2017, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part
hereof).

Seventh Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 17, 2017, among Park-Ohio
Industries, Inc., RB&W Corporation of Canada, the European Borrowers (as defined
therein) party thereto, the other Loan Parties (as defined therein), the Lenders (as defined
therein), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian agent, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as European agent
and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as sole lead arranger and bookrunning manager (filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on April 17, 2017, SEC File
No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof).

76

Exhibit

10.1

10.2*

10.3*

10.4*

10.5*

10.6*

10.7*

10.8*

10.9*

10.10*

10.11*

10.12*

10.13

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and
each of its directors and certain officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-
Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., filed on May 30, 2012, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

2015 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Form S-8 of Park-
Ohio Holdings Corp., filed on June 4, 2015, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by
reference and made a part hereof)

Form of Restricted Share Agreement between the Company and each non-employee
director (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., filed on
January 25, 2005, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made
a part hereof)

Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, SEC File No. 000-
03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K of Park-
Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K of
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134
and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. Annual Cash Bonus Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q
for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp, filed August 10, 2015, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Form of Performance Based Restricted Share Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q
of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed August 10, 2015, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Edward F. Crawford, effective as of
March 10, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 2007, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and
made a part hereof)

Non-qualified Defined Contribution Retirement Benefit Letter Agreement for Edward F.
Crawford, dated March 10, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K of Park-Ohio
Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007, SEC File No. 000-03134 and
incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

2009 Director Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (Filed
as Exhibit 10 to Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed May 10, 2011, SEC File
No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)

Registration Rights Agreement, dated April 17, 2017, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the
Guarantors (as defined therein) and the initial purchasers that are party thereto (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on April 17, 2017, SEC
File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof).

77

Exhibit

21.1

23.1

24.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

101.INS

101.SCH

101.CAL

101.DEF

101.LAB

101.PRE

List of Subsidiaries of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Power of Attorney

Principal Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Certification requirement under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

XBRL Instance Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

*

Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant
to Item 15(c) of this Report.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

78

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this

report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
(Registrant)

/s/ Patrick W. Fogarty

By:
Name: Patrick W. Fogarty
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 8, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by

the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

*

Edward F. Crawford

*

Patrick W. Fogarty

*

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Matthew V. Crawford

President, Chief Operating Officer and Director

*

Patrick V. Auletta

Director

*

John D. Grampa

Director

*

Dan T. Moore, III

Director

*
Ronna Romney

*

Director

Steven H. Rosen

Director

*

James W. Wert

Director

March 8,
2018

*

The undersigned, pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by each of the directors and officers identified
above and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by signing his name hereto, does hereby
sign and execute this report on behalf of each of the persons noted above, in the capacities indicated.

March 8, 2018

By:

/s/ ROBERT D. VILSACK
Robert D. Vilsack, Attorney-in-Fact

79

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.1

I, Edward F. Crawford, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By:

/s/ Edward F. Crawford

Name: Edward F. Crawford
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 8, 2018

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.2

I, Patrick W. Fogarty, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

By:

/s/ Patrick W. Fogarty

Name: Patrick W. Fogarty
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 8, 2018

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

By:

/s/ Edward F. Crawford

Name: Edward F. Crawford
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

By:

/s/ Patrick W. Fogarty

Name: Patrick W. Fogarty
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 8, 2018

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as

part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF PARKOHIO’S FORM 10-K FILING

ParkOhio Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total return of ParkOhio’s common stock for the five-year

period ending December 31, 2017, against the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 SmallCap 600 Index
(broad market comparison) and the NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies) (line of business comparison). The
graph and table assume $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested.

Produced on 2/8/2018 including data to 12/31/2017

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return

350.00

300.00

250.00

200.00

150.00

100.00

50.00

0.00

12/31/2012

12/31/2013

12/31/2014

12/31/2015

12/31/2016

12/31/2017

Legend

Symbol

Total Return Index For:

12/2012 12/2013 12/2014 12/2015 12/2016 12/2017

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp
S&P Smallcap 600 Index
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)

100.00
100.00
100.00

245.89
141.31
139.38

297.86
149.45
160.72

175.87
146.50
173.11

207.36
185.40
190.07

226.60
209.94
203.16

/
•
(cid:2)

Notes:

A.
B.
C.
D.

The lines represent monthly index levels derived from compounded daily returns that include all dividends.
The indexes are reweighted daily, using the market capitalization on the previous trading day.
If the monthly interval, based on the fiscal year-end, is not a trading day, the preceding trading day is used.
The index level for all series was set to $100.00 on 12/31/2012.

NOTE: Prepared by Zacks Investment Research, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 1980-2018.
NOTE: Index Data: Copyright Standard and Poor’s, Inc. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
NOTE: Index Data: Calculated (or Derived) based from CRSP NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies), Center
for Research in Security Prices (CRSP®), Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago. Copyright
2018. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

Board of Directors

Edward F. Crawford (a)(d)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Matthew V. Crawford (a)(d)
President and Chief Operating Officer

Patrick V. Auletta (a)
President Emeritus
KeyBank National Association

John D. Grampa (b)
Retired Chief Financial Officer
Materion Corporation

Dan T. Moore III (d)(e)
Chief Executive Officer
Dan T. Moore Co.

Officers

Ronna Romney (c)(e)
Director
Molina Healthcare, Inc. 

Steven H. Rosen (b)(c)
Co-Chief Executive Officer
Resilience Capital Partners

James W. Wert (b)(e)
Chief Executive Officer and President
CM Wealth Advisors, Inc.

(a) Executive Committee
(b) Audit Committee
(c) Compensation Committee
(d) Long-Range Planning Committee
(e) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Edward F. Crawford
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Patrick W. Fogarty
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Matthew V. Crawford
President and Chief Operating Officer

Robert D. Vilsack
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer

Shareholder Information and Press Releases

ParkOhio files Forms 10-K and 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Shareholders may obtain
copies of these reports, including ParkOhio’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2017, and copies of ParkOhio’s 
Annual Report to Shareholders, without charge, by accessing the Company’s website at www.pkoh.com or by
writing or calling:

Corporate Secretary
Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
6065 Parkland Boulevard 
Cleveland, Ohio 44124
(440) 947-2000
www.pkoh.com

ParkOhio’s recent news releases may also be accessed through its website.

ParkOhio World Headquarters

Please send your suggestions or recommendations to investor@pkoh.com or mail them to our headquarters.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. ~ 6065 Parkland Boulevard ~ Cleveland, OH 44124 ~ 440-947-2000 ~ www.pkoh.com