2024 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 001-35349 Phillips 66 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 45-3779385 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 2331 CityWest Blvd., Houston, Texas 77042 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 832-765-3010 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value PSX New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 28, 2024, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price on that date of $141.17, was $59 billion. The registrant, solely for the purpose of this required presentation, had deemed its Board of Directors and executive officers to be affiliates, and deducted their stockholdings in determining the aggregate market value. The registrant had 407,698,347 shares of common stock outstanding at January 31, 2025. Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page PART I 1 and 2. Business and Properties 1 Corporate Structure 1 Segment and Geographic Information 3 Midstream 3 Chemicals 12 Refining 14 Marketing and Specialties 18 Renewable Fuels 20 Energy Research & Innovation 20 Human Capital 20 Competition 22 General 23 1A. Risk Factors 24 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 42 1C. Cybersecurity 42 3. Legal Proceedings 43 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 44 Information About Our Executive Officers 45 PART II 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 46 6. [Reserved] 47 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 48 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 91 Cautionary Statement for the Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 93 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 95 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 176 9A. Controls and Procedures 176 9B. Other Information 176 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 176 PART III 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 177 11. Executive Compensation 177 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 177 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 177 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 177 PART IV 15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules 178 16. Form 10-K Summary 178 Signatures 186 Unless otherwise indicated, the “company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “Phillips 66” are used in this report to refer to the businesses of Phillips 66 and its consolidated subsidiaries. This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual Report) contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements relating to the company’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions that are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target,” “priorities” and similar expressions often identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean a statement is not forward- looking. The company does not undertake to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking information unless required to do so pursuant to applicable law. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s disclosures under the headings “Risk Factors” and “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ‘SAFE HARBOR’ PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995.” PART I Items 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES CORPORATE STRUCTURE Phillips 66, headquartered in Houston, Texas, was incorporated in Delaware in 2011 in connection with, and in anticipation of, a restructuring of ConocoPhillips that separated its downstream businesses into an independent, publicly traded company named Phillips 66. The two companies were separated by ConocoPhillips distributing to its shareholders all the shares of common stock of Phillips 66 after the market closed on April 30, 2012 (the separation). Phillips 66 stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the “PSX” stock symbol. Operating Segments Basis of Presentation Effective April 1, 2024, we changed the internal financial information reviewed by our chief executive officer to evaluate performance and allocate resources to our operating segments. This resulted in changes to the composition of our operating segments, as well as measurement changes for certain activities between our operating segments. The primary effects are summarized below. Prior period information has been recast for comparability. • Establishment of a Renewable Fuels operating segment, which includes renewable fuels activities and assets historically reported in our Refining, Marketing and Specialties (M&S) and Midstream operating segments. • Change in method of allocating results for certain Gulf Coast distillate export activities from our M&S operating segment to our Refining operating segment. • Reclassification of certain crude oil and international clean products trading activities between our M&S operating segment and our Refining operating segment. • Change in reporting of our investment in NOVONIX Limited (NOVONIX) from our Midstream operating segment to Corporate and Other. 1 Our businesses are now organized into five operating segments: 1) Midstream—Provides crude oil and refined petroleum product transportation, terminaling and processing services, as well as natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) transportation, storage, fractionation, gathering, processing and marketing services in the United States. In addition, this segment exports liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to global markets. 2) Chemicals—Consists of our 50% equity investment in Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem), which manufactures and markets petrochemicals and plastics on a worldwide basis. 3) Refining—Refines crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, such as gasoline and distillates, including aviation fuels. This segment includes 11 refineries in the United States and Europe. 4) Marketing and Specialties—Purchases for resale and markets refined products, mainly in the United States and Europe. In addition, this segment includes the manufacturing and marketing of base oils and lubricants. 5) Renewable Fuels—Processes renewable feedstocks into renewable products at the Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex (Rodeo Complex) and at our Humber Refinery. In addition, this segment includes the global activities to procure renewable feedstocks, manage certain regulatory credits, and market renewable fuels. Corporate and Other includes general corporate overhead, interest income, interest expense, our investment in research of new technologies, business transformation restructuring costs, our investment in NOVONIX, and various other corporate activities. Corporate assets include all cash, cash equivalents, income tax-related assets and enterprise information technology assets. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding restructuring costs. 2 SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION MIDSTREAM The Midstream segment consists of two businesses: • Transportation—Transports crude oil and other feedstocks to our refineries and other locations, delivers refined petroleum products to market, and provides terminaling and storage services for crude oil and refined petroleum products. • NGL—Gathers, processes, transports and markets natural gas; transports, fractionates, markets and exports NGL. At December 31, 2024, our Midstream segment owned or held partial interests in approximately 70,000 miles of crude oil, refined petroleum product, NGL and natural gas pipeline systems; 39 refined petroleum product terminals; 34 gathering and processing plants; 15 crude oil terminals; eight fractionation facilities; six NGL terminals; a petroleum coke exporting facility; and various other storage and loading facilities that are located in the United States. Acquisition On July 1, 2024, we acquired Pinnacle Midland Parent LLC (Pinnacle Midstream) to expand our natural gas gathering and processing operations in the Permian Basin for cash consideration of $565 million. Pending Acquisition On January 6, 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all issued and outstanding equity interests in each of EPIC Y-Grade GP, LLC (Y- Grade GP) and EPIC Y-Grade, LP (Y-Grade LP, and, together with Y-Grade GP and their respective subsidiaries, EPIC Y-Grade), which own various long haul natural gas liquids pipelines, fractionation facilities and distribution systems, for cash consideration of $2.2 billion, subject to certain closing adjustments. The closing date of this transaction is dependent on regulatory approval and completion of other customary closing conditions. See Note 5—Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the acquisition of Pinnacle Midstream and the pending EPIC Y-Grade acquisition. Investment and Asset Dispositions During the year ended December 31, 2024, we sold the following assets: • Our equity interests in certain pipeline and terminaling assets in North Dakota. • Certain gathering and processing assets in Texas. • Our ownership interests in certain gathering and processing assets in Louisiana and Alabama. • Our 25% ownership interest in Rockies Express Pipeline LLC. Subsequent Investment Disposition On January 30, 2025, we sold our 25% ownership interest in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables and Note 10—Properties, Plants and Equipment, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the above dispositions. 3 Transportation We own, hold partial interests in, or lease various assets to provide transportation, terminaling and storage services. These assets include crude oil, refined petroleum product, NGL, and natural gas pipeline systems; crude oil, refined petroleum product and NGL terminals; a petroleum coke handling facility; marine vessels; railcars and trucks. Pipelines and Terminals The following table depicts our ownership interest in major pipeline systems included in our Transportation business at December 31, 2024: Name State of Origination/Terminus Interest Length (Miles) Gross Capacity (MB/D) Crude Oil Bakken Pipeline North Dakota/Texas 25 % 1,918 750 Bayou Bridge Texas/Louisiana 40 213 480 Clifton Ridge Louisiana 100 10 260 CushPo Oklahoma 100 62 130 Eagle Ford Gathering Texas 100 28 58 Glacier Montana 79 800 124 Gray Oak Pipeline Texas 7 862 900 Line 100 California 100 79 61 Line 200 California 100 228 100 Line 300 California 100 61 34 Line 400 California 100 153 46 Line O Oklahoma/Texas 100 276 38 New Mexico Crude New Mexico/Texas 100 227 106 Oklahoma Crude Texas/Oklahoma 100 217 100 STACK PL Oklahoma 50 149 250 Sweeny Crude Texas 100 56 617 West Texas Crude Texas 100 1,079 140 4 Name State of Origination/Terminus Interest Length (Miles) Gross Capacity (MB/D) Refined Petroleum Products ATA Line Texas/New Mexico 50 % 293 34 Borger to Amarillo Texas 100 93 74 Borger-Denver Texas 100 38 39 Borger-Denver Texas/Colorado 65 207 39 Borger-Denver Colorado 70 152 39 Cherokee East Oklahoma/Missouri 100 320 59 Cherokee North Oklahoma/Kansas 100 29 55 Cherokee South Oklahoma 100 98 47 Cross Channel Connector Texas 100 5 197 Explorer Texas/Indiana 22 1,830 660 Gold Line Texas/Illinois 100 686 120 Heartland* Kansas/Iowa 50 49 30 LAX Jet Line California 50 19 25 Los Angeles Products California 100 22 132 Paola Products Kansas 100 106 120 Pioneer Wyoming/Utah 50 562 63 Powder River Colorado/Texas 100 350 13 Richmond California 100 14 31 SAAL Texas 33 102 32 SAAL Texas 54 19 30 Seminoe Montana/Wyoming 100 342 50 Standish Oklahoma/Kansas 100 92 77 Sweeny to Pasadena Texas 100 120 335 Torrance Products California 100 8 279 Watson Products California 100 9 238 Yellowstone Montana/Washington 46 710 68 NGL Blue Line Texas/Illinois 100 688 26 Brown Line Oklahoma/Kansas 100 76 26 Conway to Wichita Kansas 100 55 26 Medford Oklahoma 100 42 25 Skelly-Belvieu Texas 50 571 45 TX Panhandle Y1/Y2 Texas 100 249 78 * Total pipeline system is 419 miles. Phillips 66 has an ownership interest in multiple segments totaling 49 miles. 5 The following table depicts our ownership interest in terminal and storage facilities included in our Transportation business at December 31, 2024: Facility Name Location Commodity Handled Interest Gross Storage Capacity (MBbl) Gross Rack Capacity (MB/D) Albuquerque New Mexico Refined Petroleum Products 100 % 274 20 Amarillo Texas Refined Petroleum Products 100 296 23 Beaumont Texas Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 16,800 8 Billings Montana Refined Petroleum Products 100 81 12 Billings Crude Montana Crude Oil 100 236 N/A Borger Texas Crude Oil 50 1,068 N/A Bozeman Montana Refined Petroleum Products 100 134 5 Buffalo Crude Montana Crude Oil 100 303 N/A Casper Wyoming Refined Petroleum Products 100 365 7 Clifton Ridge Louisiana Crude Oil 100 3,800 N/A Coalinga California Crude Oil 100 817 N/A Colton California Refined Petroleum Products 100 207 20 Cushing Oklahoma Crude Oil 100 675 N/A Cut Bank Montana Crude Oil 100 315 N/A Denver Colorado Refined Petroleum Products 100 441 43 Des Moines Iowa Refined Petroleum Products 50 217 12 East St. Louis Illinois Refined Petroleum Products 100 1,529 55 Glenpool Oklahoma Refined Petroleum Products 100 571 18 Great Falls Montana Refined Petroleum Products 100 198 6 Hartford Illinois Refined Petroleum Products 100 1,468 21 Helena Montana Refined Petroleum Products 100 195 5 Jefferson City Missouri Refined Petroleum Products 100 103 15 Junction California Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 524 N/A Kansas City Kansas Refined Petroleum Products 100 1,410 50 La Junta Colorado Refined Petroleum Products 100 99 5 Lake Charles Pipeline Storage Louisiana Refined Petroleum Products 50 3,143 N/A Lincoln Nebraska Refined Petroleum Products 100 217 12 Linden New Jersey Refined Petroleum Products 100 360 95 Los Angeles California Refined Petroleum Products 100 156 80 Lubbock Texas Refined Petroleum Products 100 182 18 Medford Spheres Oklahoma NGL 100 70 N/A Missoula Montana Refined Petroleum Products 50 365 14 Moses Lake Washington Refined Petroleum Products 50 216 10 Mount Vernon Missouri Refined Petroleum Products 100 365 40 North Salt Lake Utah Refined Petroleum Products 50 755 60 North Spokane Washington Refined Petroleum Products 100 492 N/A Odessa Texas Crude Oil 100 521 N/A Oklahoma City Oklahoma Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 355 42 6 Facility Name Location Commodity Handled Interest Gross Storage Capacity (MBbl) Gross Rack Capacity (MB/D) Paola Kansas Refined Petroleum Products 100 % 978 N/A Pasadena Texas Refined Petroleum Products, NGL 100 3,558 65 Pecan Grove Louisiana Lubricant Base Stocks, Refined Petroleum Products 100 177 N/A Ponca City Oklahoma Refined Petroleum Products 100 63 22 Ponca City Crude Oklahoma Crude Oil 100 1,229 N/A Portland Oregon Refined Petroleum Products 100 650 38 Renton Washington Refined Petroleum Products 100 243 19 Richmond California Refined Petroleum Products 100 343 28 Rock Springs Wyoming Refined Petroleum Products 100 132 8 Sacramento California Refined Petroleum Products 100 146 12 Santa Margarita California Crude Oil 100 398 N/A Sheridan Wyoming Refined Petroleum Products 100 94 6 Spokane Washington Refined Petroleum Products 100 351 20 Tacoma Washington Refined Petroleum Products 100 316 19 Torrance California Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 2,128 N/A Tremley Point New Jersey Refined Petroleum Products 100 1,701 25 Westlake Louisiana Refined Petroleum Products 100 128 10 Wichita Falls Texas Crude Oil 100 225 N/A Wichita North Kansas Refined Petroleum Products 100 769 20 Wichita South Kansas Refined Petroleum Products 100 272 N/A The following table depicts our ownership interest in marine, rail and petroleum coke loading and offloading facilities included in our Transportation business at December 31, 2024: Facility Name Location Commodity Handled Interest Gross Loading Capacity* Marine Beaumont Texas Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 % 75 Clifton Ridge Louisiana Crude Oil, Refined Petroleum Products 100 50 Hartford Illinois Refined Petroleum Products 100 3 Pecan Grove Louisiana Lubricant Base Stocks, Refined Petroleum Products 100 6 Portland Oregon Refined Petroleum Products 100 10 Richmond California Refined Petroleum Products 100 3 Tacoma Washington Crude Oil 100 12 Tremley Point New Jersey Refined Petroleum Products 100 7 Rail Bayway New Jersey Crude Oil 100 75 Beaumont Texas Crude Oil 100 20 Ferndale Washington Crude Oil 100 35 Missoula Montana Refined Petroleum Products 50 41 Thompson Falls Montana Refined Petroleum Products 50 41 Petroleum Coke Lake Charles Louisiana Petroleum Coke 50 N/A * Marine facilities in thousands of barrels per hour (MB/h); Rail in thousands of barrels daily (MB/D). 7 Marine Vessels At December 31, 2024, we had 13 international-flagged crude oil, refined product and NGL tankers and one Jones Act-compliant tanker under time charter contracts, with capacities ranging in size from 300,000 to 800,000 barrels. We also had a variety of inland and offshore tug/barge units. These vessels are used primarily to transport crude oil and other feedstocks, as well as refined products for our facilities. In addition, the NGL tankers are used to export propane and butane from our infrastructure. Truck and Rail Our truck and rail fleets support our feedstock and distribution operations. Truck movements are provided through our wholly owned subsidiary, Sentinel Transportation LLC, and through numerous third-party trucking companies. Rail movements are provided via a fleet of approximately 8,900 owned or leased railcars. 8 NGL At December 31, 2024, our NGL business owned or held partial interests in a diversified and integrated portfolio of assets across the wellhead-to- market value chain. Our portfolio includes natural gas processing plants, NGL and natural gas pipeline systems, and fractionators located in the United States. A significant portion of our NGL business is conducted through DCP Midstream, LP (DCP LP), a consolidated subsidiary in which we hold an aggregate direct and indirect economic interest of 86.8%. DCP LP is one of the largest processors of natural gas and one of the largest producers of NGLs in the United States. DCP LP’s gathering and processing assets are strategically located in some of the major producing regions in the United States, including the Permian Basin, the Denver-Julesburg Basin, the Midcontinent and Eagle Ford. Pipeline Systems Pipeline systems owned by DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Sand Hills) and DCP Southern Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Southern Hills), consolidated subsidiaries in which we hold aggregate direct and indirect economic interests of 91.2%, provide takeaway capabilities for DCP LP’s gathering and processing operations in the Permian Basin, Midcontinent and Eagle Ford, and provide access to customers and market outlets on the U.S. Gulf Coast, including the Mont Belvieu, Texas, market hub and our Sweeny fractionation and export facilities (the Sweeny Hub). Natural Gas Processing At some of our facilities, we fractionate NGL into individual components (ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline). We own or hold partial interests in 34 active natural gas processing facilities that have a net processing capacity of 4.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d). Sweeny Hub Assets The Sweeny Hub is a U.S. Gulf Coast NGL market hub, consisting of four fractionators with a total fractionation nameplate capacity of 550,000 barrels per day (B/D), an LPG export terminal, and NGL storage caverns. The fractionators are located adjacent to our Sweeny Refinery in Old Ocean, Texas, and supply purity ethane to the petrochemical industry and purity NGL to domestic and global markets. Raw NGL supply is delivered to the fractionators from nearby major pipelines, including the DCP Sand Hills pipeline system. The fractionators are supported by significant infrastructure including connectivity to two NGL supply pipelines, a pipeline connecting to the Mont Belvieu market hub and our Clemens Caverns storage facility with access to our LPG export terminal in Freeport, Texas. It also includes our C2G Pipeline, which is a 16-inch ethane pipeline that connects our Clemens Caverns storage facility to petrochemical facilities in Gregory, Texas, near Corpus Christi. The Freeport LPG Export Terminal leverages our fractionation, transportation and storage infrastructure to supply petrochemical, heating and transportation markets globally. The terminal can simultaneously load a propane vessel and a butane vessel, and has a combined LPG export capacity of 260,000 B/D. In addition, the terminal has the capability to export natural gasoline (C5+) produced by the Sweeny Hub fractionators. 9 The following table depicts our ownership interest in major pipeline systems included in our NGL business at December 31, 2024: Name State of Origination/Terminus Interest Length (Miles) Gross Capacity (MB/D) NGL Black Lake † Louisiana/Texas 100 % 314 80 C2G Texas 100 155 185 Chisholm Oklahoma/Kansas 50 202 42 Front Range † Colorado/Texas 33 450 260 Panola † Texas 15 250 100 Powder River Wyoming/Colorado 100 366 16 River Parish NGL Louisiana 100 499 104 Sand Hills †* New Mexico/Texas 100 1,400 500 Southern Hills †* Kansas/Texas 100 940 192 Seabreeze/Wilbreeze † Texas 100 80 52 Sweeny LPG Texas 100 260 942 Sweeny NGL Texas 100 18 204 Texas Express † Texas 10 600 370 Wattenberg † Colorado/Kansas 100 450 112 Natural Gas Cheyenne Connector † Colorado 50 70 0.6 Bcf/d Guadalupe † Texas Various 600 0.2 Bcf/d Gulf Coast Express †** Texas 25 530 2.0 Bcf/d † Owned by DCP LP. At December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 held an aggregate 86.8% direct and indirect economic interest in DCP LP. * Interest reflects Phillips 66’s 33.33% direct ownership interest and DCP LP’s 66.67% direct ownership interest in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. At December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 held an aggregate 91.2% direct and indirect economic interest in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. ** On January 30, 2025, we sold our 25% ownership interest in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC. The following table depicts our ownership interest in terminal and storage facilities included in our NGL business at December 31, 2024: Facility Name Location Commodity Handled Interest Gross Storage Capacity (MBbl) Gross Rack Capacity (MB/D) Clemens Texas NGL 100 % 16,500 N/A Freeport Texas Refined Petroleum Products, NGL 100 3,485 N/A Marysville † Michigan NGL 100 8,000 N/A River Parish Louisiana NGL 100 438 N/A Spindletop † Texas Natural Gas 100 12 Bcf N/A † Owned by DCP LP. At December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 held an aggregate 86.8% direct and indirect economic interest in DCP LP. The following table depicts our ownership interest in a marine facility included in our NGL business at December 31, 2024: Facility Name Location Commodity Handled Interest Gross Loading Capacity (MB/h) Marine Freeport Texas Refined Petroleum Products, NGL 100 % 46 10 The following table depicts our ownership interest in NGL fractionators included in our NGL business at December 31, 2024: Facility Name Location Interest Capacity (MB/D) Conway Kansas 40 % 43 Enterprise †* Texas 25 61 Gulf Coast Fractionators** Texas 23 33 Mont Belvieu 1 † Texas 20 32 Sweeny Fractionators Texas 100 550 † Owned by DCP LP. At December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 held an aggregate 86.8% direct and indirect economic interest in DCP LP. * Interest reflects Phillips 66’s 12.5% direct interest and DCP LP’s direct interest of 12.5%. ** This facility has been idled since December 2020, with plans to restart in the first quarter of 2025. The following table depicts our operating data in gathering and processing assets included in our NGL business at December 31, 2024: Regions Plants Approximate Gathering and Transmission Systems (Miles) Approximate Net Nameplate Plant Capacity (MMcf/d) † North 13 3,400 1,580 Midcontinent 6 22,700 1,110 Permian 11 15,700 1,430 South 4 4,600 690 † Includes DCP LP’s proportional ownership. At December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 held an aggregate 86.8% direct and indirect economic interest in DCP LP. 11 CHEMICALS The Chemicals segment consists of our 50% equity investment in CPChem, which is headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas. At December 31, 2024, CPChem owned or had joint venture interests in 30 manufacturing facilities located in Belgium, Colombia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and the United States. Additionally, CPChem has two research and development centers in the United States. CPChem produces and markets ethylene and other olefin products. The ethylene produced is primarily used by CPChem to produce polyethylene, normal alpha olefins (NAO) and polyethylene pipe. CPChem manufactures and markets aromatics and styrenics products, such as benzene, cyclohexane, styrene and polystyrene, as well as a variety of specialty chemical products including organosulfur chemicals, solvents, catalysts, and chemicals used in drilling and mining. The manufacturing of petrochemicals and plastics involves the conversion of hydrocarbon-based raw material feedstocks into higher-value products, often through a thermal process referred to in the industry as “cracking.” For example, ethylene can be produced by cracking ethane, propane, butane, natural gasoline or certain refinery liquids, such as naphtha and gas oil. Ethylene primarily is used as a raw material in the production of plastics, such as polyethylene. Plastic resins, such as polyethylene, are manufactured in a thermal/catalyst process, and the produced output is used as a further raw material for various applications, such as packaging and plastic pipe. 12 The following table reflects CPChem’s petrochemicals and plastics product capacities at December 31, 2024: Millions of Pounds per Year* U.S. Worldwide Ethylene 11,910 14,430 Propylene 3,675 4,180 High-density polyethylene 5,305 7,470 Low-density polyethylene 620 620 Linear low-density polyethylene 1,815 1,815 Polypropylene — 310 Normal alpha olefins 2,920 3,435 Polyalphaolefins 125 255 Polyethylene pipe 500 500 Benzene 1,600 2,530 Cyclohexane 1,060 1,455 Styrene 1,050 1,875 Polystyrene 835 915 Specialty chemicals 440 575 Total 31,855 40,365 * Capacities include CPChem’s share in equity affiliates and excludes CPChem’s NGL fractionation capacity. CPChem and a co-venturer are building world-scale petrochemical facilities on the U.S. Gulf Coast and in Ras Laffan, Qatar. On the U.S. Gulf Coast, the Golden Triangle Polymers (GTP) facility will include a 4.6 billion pounds per year ethane cracker and two high-density polyethylene units with a combined capacity of 4.4 billion pounds per year. CPChem owns a 51% equity share in the joint venture. The Ras Laffan Petrochemical (RLP) facility will include a 4.6 billion pounds per year ethane cracker and two high-density polyethylene units with a total capacity of 3.7 billion pounds per year. CPChem owns a 30% equity share in the joint venture. Both facilities are expected to start up in 2026. 13 REFINING The Refining segment refines crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, such as gasoline and distillates, including aviation fuels, at 11 refineries in the United States and Europe. In early 2024, we ceased crude operations at the San Francisco Refinery as part of the conversion of the refinery into the Rodeo Complex. The table below depicts information for each of our owned and joint venture refineries at December 31, 2024: Thousands of Barrels Daily Region/Refinery Location Interest Net Crude Throughput Capacity Net Clean Product Capacity** Clean Product Yield Capability At December 31 2024 Effective January 1 2025 Gasolines Distillates Atlantic Basin/Europe Bayway Linden, NJ 100 % 258 258 157 130 93 % Humber N. Lincolnshire, United Kingdom 100 221 221 95 115 81 MiRO* Karlsruhe, Germany 19 58 58 25 27 87 537 537 Gulf Coast Lake Charles Westlake, LA 100 264 264 105 122 72 Sweeny Old Ocean, TX 100 265 265 158 125 86 529 529 Central Corridor Ponca City Ponca City, OK 100 217 217 120 100 93 Billings Billings, MT 100 66 66 37 30 90 Wood River Roxana, IL 50 173 173 88 70 81 Borger Borger, TX 50 75 75 50 35 91 531 531 West Coast Ferndale Ferndale, WA 100 105 105 65 39 90 Los Angeles*** Carson/Wilmington, CA 100 139 139 85 65 90 244 244 1,841 1,841 * Mineraloelraffinerie Oberrhein GmbH. ** Clean product capacities are maximum rates for each clean product category, independent of each other. They are not additive when calculating the clean product yield capability for each refinery. *** In October 2024, we announced our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025. 14 Primary crude oil characteristics and sources of crude oil for our wholly owned and joint venture refineries are as follows: Characteristics Sources Sweet Medium Sour Heavy Sour High TAN United States Canada South and Central America Europe Middle East & Africa Bayway l l l l l Humber l l l l l l MiRO l l l l l l Lake Charles l l l l l l l l l Sweeny l l l l l l l l Ponca City l l l l l Billings l l l l l Wood River l l l l l l Borger l l l l l l Ferndale l l l l l l Los Angeles l l l l l l l l * High TAN (Total Acid Number): acid content greater than or equal to 1.0 milligram of potassium hydroxide (KOH) per gram. Atlantic Basin/Europe Region Bayway Refinery The Bayway Refinery is located on the New York Harbor in Linden, New Jersey. Bayway’s facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, solvent deasphalting, hydrodesulfurization and alkylation units. The complex also includes a polypropylene plant with the capacity to produce up to 775 million pounds per year. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels, as well as petrochemical feedstocks, residual fuel oil and home heating oil. Refined petroleum products are distributed to East Coast customers by pipeline, barge and railcar. Humber Refinery The Humber Refinery is located on the east coast of England in North Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, approximately 180 miles north of London. Humber’s facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrodesulfurization, thermal cracking and delayed coking units. The refinery has two coking units with associated calcining plants. Humber is the only coking refinery in the United Kingdom, and a producer of high-quality specialty graphite and anode-grade petroleum cokes. The refinery also produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. The majority of the light oils produced by the refinery are distributed to customers in the United Kingdom by pipeline, railcar and truck, while the other refined petroleum products are exported throughout the world. MiRO Refinery The MiRO Refinery is located on the Rhine River in Karlsruhe, Germany, approximately 95 miles south of Frankfurt, Germany. MiRO is the largest refinery in Germany and operates as a joint venture in which we own an 18.75% interest. Facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, petroleum coking and calcining, hydrodesulfurization, isomerization, ethyl tert-butyl ether and alkylation units. MiRO produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. Other products produced include petrochemical feedstocks, home heating oil, bitumen, and anode- and fuel- grade petroleum cokes. Refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in Germany, Switzerland, France, and Austria by truck, railcar and barge. * 15 Gulf Coast Region Lake Charles Refinery The Lake Charles Refinery is located in Westlake, Louisiana, approximately 150 miles east of Houston, Texas. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrocracking, hydrodesulfurization, isomerization and delayed coking units. Refinery facilities also include a specialty coker and calciner. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. Other products produced include off-road diesel, home heating oil, feedstock for our Excel Paralubes LLC (Excel Paralubes) joint venture in our M&S segment, and high-quality specialty graphite and fuel-grade petroleum cokes. A majority of the refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in the southeastern and eastern United States by truck, railcar, barge or major common carrier pipelines. Additionally, refined petroleum products are exported to customers primarily in Latin America by waterborne cargo. Sweeny Refinery The Sweeny Refinery is located in Old Ocean, Texas, approximately 65 miles southwest of Houston, Texas. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrodesulfurization, aromatics units, a vacuum distillation unit, and a delayed coking unit. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. Other products include petrochemical feedstocks, home heating oil and fuel-grade petroleum coke. A majority of the refined petroleum products are distributed to customers throughout the Midcontinent region, southeastern and eastern United States by pipeline, barge and railcar. Additionally, refined petroleum products are exported to customers primarily in Latin America by waterborne cargo. Central Corridor Region Ponca City Refinery The Ponca City Refinery is located in Ponca City, Oklahoma, approximately 95 miles northwest of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrodesulfurization, and delayed coking units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels and anode-grade petroleum coke. Refined petroleum products are primarily distributed to customers throughout the Midcontinent region by company-owned and common carrier pipelines. Billings Refinery The Billings Refinery is located in Billings, Montana. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrodesulfurization and delayed coking units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels and fuel-grade petroleum coke. Refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, Colorado and Washington by pipeline, railcar and truck. WRB Refining LP (WRB) We are the operator and managing partner of WRB, a 50 percent-owned joint venture that owns the Wood River and Borger refineries. • Wood River Refinery The Wood River Refinery is located in Roxana, Illinois, about 15 miles northeast of St. Louis, Missouri, at the confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri rivers. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrocracking, hydrodesulfurization and delayed coking units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. Other products produced include petrochemical feedstocks, asphalt and fuel-grade petroleum coke. Refined petroleum products are distributed to customers throughout the Midcontinent region by pipeline, railcar, barge and truck. • Borger Refinery The Borger Refinery is located in Borger, Texas, in the Texas Panhandle, approximately 50 miles north of Amarillo, Texas. Refinery facilities include crude distilling, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrodesulfurization, and delayed coking units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels, as well as fuel-grade petroleum coke, NGL and solvents. Refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in West Texas, New Mexico, Colorado and the Midcontinent region by company-owned and common carrier pipelines. 16 West Coast Region Ferndale Refinery The Ferndale Refinery is located on Puget Sound in Ferndale, Washington, approximately 20 miles south of the U.S.-Canada border. Facilities include crude distillation, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation and hydrodesulfurization units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. Other products produced include residual fuel oil, which is supplied to the northwest marine bunker fuel market. Most of the refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in the northwest United States by pipeline and barge. Los Angeles Refinery The Los Angeles Refinery consists of two facilities linked by pipeline located five miles apart in Carson and Wilmington, California, approximately 15 miles southeast of Los Angeles. The Carson facility serves as the front end of the refinery by processing crude oil, and the Wilmington facility serves as the back end of the refinery by upgrading the intermediate products to finished products. Refinery facilities include crude distillation, naphtha reforming, fluid catalytic cracking, alkylation, hydrocracking, and delayed coking units. The refinery produces a high percentage of transportation fuels. The refinery produces California Air Resources Board (CARB)-grade gasoline. Other products produced include fuel-grade petroleum coke. Refined petroleum products are distributed to customers in California, Nevada and Arizona by pipeline and truck. In October 2024, we announced our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025 and have engaged a land developer to evaluate a future redevelopment of the site. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 17 MARKETING AND SPECIALTIES The M&S segment purchases for resale and markets refined products, such as gasoline, distillates and aviation fuels, mainly in the United States and Europe. In addition, this segment includes the manufacturing and marketing of specialty products, such as base oils and lubricants. Marketing Marketing—United States We market gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel through marketer and joint venture outlets that utilize our brands, including Phillips 66, Conoco and 76. At December 31, 2024, we had approximately 7,450 branded outlets in 48 states and Puerto Rico. Our wholesale operations utilize a network of marketers operating approximately 5,220 outlets. We place a strong emphasis on the wholesale channel of trade because of its relatively lower capital requirements. In addition, we hold brand-licensing agreements covering approximately 1,450 sites. Our refined products are marketed on both a branded and unbranded basis. A high percentage of our branded marketing sales are in the Midcontinent, Rockies and West Coast regions, where our wholesale marketing network secures efficient offtake from our refineries. We also utilize consignment fuel arrangements with several marketers whereby we own the fuel inventory and pay the marketers a monthly fee. In the Gulf Coast and East Coast regions, most sales are conducted via the unbranded channel of trade, which does not require a highly integrated marketing network to secure petroleum product placement for refinery pull through. We have export capability at our U.S. coastal refineries to meet international demand. In addition to automotive gasoline and diesel, we produce and market aviation gasoline and jet fuel. Aviation gasoline and jet fuel are sold through dealers and independent marketers at approximately 780 Phillips 66 branded locations. Our network also includes assets for the domestic placement of renewable diesel. We participate in joint ventures engaged in retail convenience store operations in the West Coast, as well as the Midcontinent and Rockies regions. These joint ventures enable us to secure long-term placement of our refinery production and extend participation in the retail value chain. At December 31, 2024, our retail joint ventures had approximately 790 outlets. On October 1, 2024, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast for total consideration of $65 million. These operations were acquired to support the placement of renewable diesel produced by the Rodeo Complex. See Note 5—Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding this acquisition. Marketing—International We have marketing operations in four European countries. Our European marketing strategy is to sell primarily through owned, leased or joint venture retail sites using a low-cost, high-volume approach. We use the JET brand name to market retail and wholesale products in Austria, Germany and the United Kingdom. In addition, at December 31, 2024, we had an equity interest in Coop Mineraloel AG (Coop), a joint venture that markets refined petroleum products in Switzerland. We also market aviation fuels, LPG, heating oils, marine bunker fuels, and other secondary refined products to commercial customers and into the bulk or spot markets in the above countries. At December 31, 2024, we had approximately 1,290 marketing outlets in Europe, of which approximately 980 were company owned and approximately 310 were dealer owned, and we held brand-licensing agreements covering approximately 70 sites in Mexico. We also had interests in 330 additional sites through our Coop joint venture operations in Switzerland. On January 31, 2025, we sold our 49% ownership interest in Coop. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the sale of Coop. 18 Specialties Lubricants We manufacture and sell automotive, commercial, industrial and specialty lubricants which are marketed worldwide under the Phillips 66, Kendall, Red Line and other private label brands. In addition, we own a 50% interest in Excel Paralubes, an operated joint venture that owns a hydrocracked lubricant base oil manufacturing plant located adjacent to the Lake Charles Refinery. The facility has capacity to produce 22,200 B/D of high-quality Group II clear hydrocracked base oils. Excel Paralubes markets the produced base oil under the Pure Performance brand. The facility’s feedstock is sourced primarily from our Lake Charles Refinery. 19 RENEWABLE FUELS The Renewable Fuels segment processes renewable feedstocks into renewable products at the Rodeo Complex and at our Humber Refinery. In addition, this segment includes the global activities to procure renewable feedstocks, manage certain regulatory credits, and market renewable diesel, renewable jet fuel and other renewable fuels. Rodeo Complex During 2024, we completed the conversion of our San Francisco Refinery in Rodeo, California, into the Rodeo Complex and expanded commercial scale production of renewable diesel. The Rodeo Complex can process approximately 50,000 B/D (800 million gallons per year) of renewable feedstocks, such as used cooking oil, vegetable oils and other low-carbon intensity waste oils and byproducts, into renewable fuels, including renewable diesel and renewable jet fuel. The renewable fuel production primarily will be distributed to customers in California, Oregon and Washington. During 2024, we announced we are collaborating with an energy service provider to power the Rodeo Complex with a 30.2 megawatt solar facility. The solar facility will reduce the Rodeo Complex’s grid power demand by 50% and is expected to avoid approximately 33,000 metric tons a year of carbon dioxide emissions beginning in the first quarter of 2025, based on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) AVoided Emissions and geneRation Tool. During 2024, we delivered an initial 600,000 gallons of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) to an airline at an international airport in the United States. Also during 2024, we entered into an agreement to supply 3 million gallons through the first half of 2025 of SAF to an airline at another large international airport in the United States. European Renewables Our renewables value chain in the United Kingdom (European renewables) globally sources a wide range of renewable feedstocks, including used cooking oil, for co-processing at the Humber Refinery, as well as for supplying products to the market, such as sustainable aviation fuel. In addition, European renewables supplies renewable feedstock, including tallow, into the Rodeo Complex. ENERGY RESEARCH & INNOVATION Our Energy Research & Innovation organization, located in Bartlesville, Oklahoma, includes scientists and engineers working in over 200 laboratories and numerous pilot plants on our 440 acre research campus to develop new technical solutions focused on advancing our business and solving tomorrow’s energy challenges. Areas of focus for 2024 included feedstock characterization, renewables processing, and process optimization to enhance margins and reliability in our Refining, Midstream, M&S and Renewable Fuels segments. HUMAN CAPITAL Phillips 66 employees, our human capital, are guided by our values of safety, honor and commitment. Together, we operate as a high-performing organization by building breadth and depth in capabilities, pursuing excellence and doing the right thing. We empower our people to create and innovate, and to work in ways that are designed to enable us to deliver industry leading performance. At December 31, 2024, we had approximately 13,200 employees working toward our mission of providing energy and improving lives and our vision to be the leading integrated downstream energy provider. We believe maintaining and enhancing a high-performing organization is critical to our success. Our employees promote our culture and are integral to achieving our strategic priorities and maximizing long-term shareholder value. We strive for continuous improvement of our high-performing organization, as we believe that our employees differentiate us in the marketplace. The human capital measures and objectives that we focus on in managing our business and that we believe are important to understand our business, include: 20 • Safety—Safety is the cornerstone of our business. We endeavor to protect the health and safety of everyone who has a role in our operations and the communities in which we operate. We employ rigorous employee training and audit programs to drive ongoing improvement in personal safety as we strive for zero incidents. We include environmental and safety metrics in our annual incentive compensation program, including our total recordable rate and process safety event rate, to incentivize and reward safe operations. Under the variable cash incentive program, our personal safety performance is measured by our total recordable rate (TRR), which measures the number of incidents per 200,000 hours worked. In 2024, our combined workforce TRR of 0.12 was 23 times better than the U.S. manufacturing average. • Culture—Phillips 66 seeks to foster behaviors that support our culture. “Our Energy in Action” is a set of core behaviors embedded in the company’s talent and business processes to drive performance and accountability. Those behaviors include working for the greater good; creating an environment of trust; seeking different perspectives; and pursuing excellence. In addition, we believe a high level of performance can be achieved through an inclusive culture that supports equal opportunities. Our Executive Inclusion and Diversity and Culture Council, chaired by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and comprised of executives and business leaders that serve as global sponsors of our ten Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), supports our goal to build an inclusive culture. Our ERGs are grassroots organizations, available to all employees, and are focused on professional development, networking, community involvement and supporting Phillips 66 recruiting activities. We regularly conduct employee engagement surveys that enable us to capture real-time feedback on metrics such as employee engagement, manager effectiveness, performance enablement and our culture. Management analyzes the findings from the survey to monitor our progress and identify potential areas of opportunity. • Capability—We strive to build depth and breadth in the skills of our employees to create a workforce ready for the future. We drive employee development through technical training and providing opportunities for job rotations, as well as assisting employees with obtaining and sharpening managerial skills through targeted development programs and promotional moves. Our performance management process is designed to identify coaching and training needs. We also have robust succession management practices and work each year to identify successors for key leadership positions within the company. • Performance—We focus on delivering exceptional, sustainable results. We work towards retention of top talent and have advanced the effectiveness of our performance management process by embedding “Our Energy in Action” into the process to help drive desired behaviors. Additionally, “High Performing Organization” is one of the metrics used in our variable cash incentive program. In assessing our “High Performing Organization,” we measure success in areas such as culture, engagement, talent, technology, human capital management, and our organization’s ability to adapt and respond to challenges, changing market conditions and other external factors. 21 COMPETITION Our businesses operate in a competitive environment. In the Midstream segment, our crude oil and refined petroleum products pipelines face competition from other crude oil and products pipeline companies, major integrated oil companies, as well as independent crude oil gathering, processing and marketing companies. Competition is based primarily on quality of customer service and reliability, competitive rates and the proximity of our assets to customers and market hubs. In addition, the Midstream segment competes with numerous integrated petroleum companies, as well as natural gas processing, transmission and distribution companies, to deliver natural gas and NGL to end users. Principal methods of competing include economically securing the right to purchase raw natural gas for gathering systems, managing the pressure of those systems, operating efficient NGL and gas processing plants and securing markets placement for the products produced. Elements of competition for each of our Chemicals, Refining and Renewable Fuels segments include product improvement, new product development, low-cost structures, ability to source and run adequate and high-quality feedstocks, and efficient manufacturing and distribution systems. In the M&S segment, competitive factors include product properties, reliability of supply, customer service, price and credit terms, advertising and sales promotion, and development of customer loyalty to branded products. 22 GENERAL At December 31, 2024, we held a total of 511 active patents in 16 countries worldwide, including 400 active U.S. patents. The overall profitability of any operating segment is not dependent on any single patent, trademark, license or franchise. In support of our goal to attain zero incidents, we seek to mitigate risks across the enterprise through a comprehensive Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) management system that systematically identifies, assesses and manages risks to safeguard employees, contractors and the environment. Its focus is ongoing risk identification, prioritization and control while promoting continuous improvement in implementing HSE policies, meeting leadership expectations and upholding our core values. We strive for operating excellence by integrating our health, occupational safety, process safety and environmental principles throughout our business with a commitment to pursue continuous improvement. We are subject to various federal laws and government regulations concerning environmental matters and employee safety and health in the United States and other countries. In addition, many state and local governments have adopted environmental and employee safety and health laws and regulations, some of which are similar to federal requirements. State and federal authorities may seek fines and penalties for violating these laws and regulations. The material effects of compliance with these government regulations upon our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position are primarily associated with environmental regulations. See the environmental information contained in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital Resources and Liquidity—Contingencies” under the captions “Environmental” and “Climate Change.” It includes information on expensed and capitalized environmental costs for 2024 and those expected for 2025 and 2026. Website Access to Reports Our Internet website address is http://www.phillips66.com. Information contained on our Internet website is not part of this Annual Report. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Alternatively, you may access these reports at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. 23 Item 1A. RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report. Each of these risk factors could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as the value of an investment in our securities. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face; our operations could also be affected by factors, events or uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we do not currently consider to present significant risks to our operations. Summary of Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Manufacturing and Operations • Margins for the products we produce are cyclical and volatile due to changes in market conditions, which are largely dependent on factors beyond our control, and directly affect our earnings, financial condition and cash flows. • The prices at which we buy our feedstocks are dependent on market conditions that are beyond our control, and changes in supply and demand for the feedstocks we process directly impact the results of our business. • Changes to government policies relating to renewable feedstocks and renewable fuels that adversely affect programs like the renewable fuels standards program, low-carbon fuels standards and tax credits for processing certain renewable feedstocks impact our financial condition and results of operations. • Our operations are subject to planned and unplanned downtime, business interruptions, and operational hazards, any of which could adversely impact our ability to operate and could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. • We are subject to interruptions of supply and offtake, as well as increased costs, as a result of our reliance on third-party transportation of crude oil or other feedstocks, NGL, refined petroleum and renewable fuels products. • Our investments in joint ventures decrease our ability to manage risk. • Public health crises, epidemics and pandemics have had and could in the future have a material adverse effect on our business. Any future widespread health crises could materially and adversely impact our business. Competition Risks • Refining, midstream and marketing competitors that produce their own feedstocks, have more extensive retail outlets, or have greater financial resources may have a competitive advantage. • Our Midstream segment competes for natural gas supplies with other companies that provide midstream gathering and processing, transportation, fractionation and terminaling services, and a failure to grow or maintain throughput levels may negatively impact the results of operations of our business. • Volatility in market demand for our petrochemical and plastics products and midstream transportation services and the risk of overbuild in these industries may negatively impact the results of operations of our businesses. Strategic Performance and Future Growth Risks • Large capital-intensive projects can take many years to complete, and the political and regulatory environments or market conditions could change significantly between the project approval date and the project startup date, negatively impacting expected project returns. • Plans we or our joint ventures may have to expand or construct assets or develop new technologies, and plans for our future performance are subject to risks associated with societal and political pressures and other forms of opposition to the future development, transportation and use of petroleum-based and renewables-based fuels. Such risks could adversely impact our business and results of operations. • Political and economic developments could affect our operations and materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. • We may not be able to effectively identify, whether through acquisition, investment or development, lower-carbon opportunities on favorable terms, or at all, and failure to do so could limit our growth, our ability to participate in the energy transition, and our ability to meet our environmental goals and targets. • Our business could be negatively impacted as a result of shareholder activism. 24 Legal, Regulatory, and Environmental, Climate and Weather Risks • We are subject to a variety of legal proceedings and other claims arising out of our operations which may adversely impact our business and financial condition. • Climate change and severe weather may adversely affect our and our joint ventures’ facilities and ongoing operations. • There are certain environmental hazards and risks inherent in our operations that could adversely affect those operations and our financial results. • We expect to continue to incur substantial capital expenditures and operating costs to comply with existing and future environmental laws and regulations. • Factors associated with climate change legislation or regulation could result in increased operating costs, reduce demand for the refined petroleum products we produce and could otherwise have a material impact on our business. • Increased regulation of the fossil fuel industry, particularly with respect to hydraulic fracturing, could result in reductions or delays in the production of crude oil and natural gas, which could adversely impact our results of operations. • Compliance with the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) could adversely affect our financial results. • Societal, technological, political and scientific developments around emissions and fuel efficiency may decrease demand for petroleum-based fuels. • Continuing political and social concerns about climate change and other Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters may result in changes to our business and significant expenditures, including litigation-related expenses. • Increased concerns regarding plastic waste in the environment, consumers selectively reducing their consumption of plastic products due to recycling concerns, or new or more restrictive regulations and rules related to plastic waste could reduce demand for CPChem’s plastic products and could negatively impact our equity interest. Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Risks • Cybersecurity incidents and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer. • Increasing regulatory focus on privacy and cybersecurity issues and expanding laws could expose us to increased liability, subject us to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations that could significantly and adversely affect our business. Indebtedness, Capital Markets and Financial Risks • Uncertainty and illiquidity in credit and capital markets can impair our ability to obtain credit and financing on acceptable terms and can adversely affect the financial strength of our business partners. • Negative sentiment towards fossil fuels and increased attention to environmental and social matters, including climate change, could adversely affect our business, the market price for our securities and our access to and cost of capital. • Our published GHG emissions intensity reduction goals and other E&S targets we may set in the future could negatively impact our business. • We do not fully insure against all potential losses, including those from extreme weather events or natural disasters, and, therefore, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by unexpected or underinsured liabilities and increased costs. • Deterioration in our credit profile could increase our costs of borrowing money, limit our access to the capital markets and commercial credit, and could trigger co-venturer rights under joint venture arrangements. • The level of returns on pension and postretirement plan assets and the actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect our earnings and cash flows in future periods. • We may incur losses as a result of our forward contracts and derivative transactions. • We are subject to continuing contingent liabilities of ConocoPhillips following the separation. ConocoPhillips has indemnified us for certain matters, but may not be able to satisfy its obligations to us in the future. 25 Risks Related to Our Manufacturing and Operations Margins for the products we produce are cyclical and volatile due to changes in market conditions, which are largely dependent on factors beyond our control, and directly affect our earnings, financial condition and cash flows. Similar to other companies in the industries in which we operate, our financial results are largely affected by the relationship, or margin, between the prices at which we sell refined petroleum, petrochemical, plastics and renewable fuels products and the prices for crude oil, natural gas, NGL, renewable feedstocks and other feedstocks used in manufacturing these products. Historically, margins have been volatile and the industry in which we operate is cyclical in nature, and we expect such volatility and cyclicality to continue. The price at which we purchase crude oil, natural gas, NGLs and renewable feedstocks and the prices at which we can ultimately sell our refined products depend upon factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to: • global and local demand; • production levels of feedstocks; • production levels of refined products by competitors; • import and export capabilities; • seasonality and weather conditions; • transportation availability and cost; • changes in energy prices; • economic, political and regulatory conditions domestically and internationally, including imposition of tariffs or other tax incentives or disincentives; • the impacts of the members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and non-OPEC member producing nations that may agree to set production levels; • geopolitical risks, such as the ongoing global impact of conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe; • technological advances affecting energy consumption and supply; and • consumer preferences and the use and availability of substitute products. Also, supply contracts generally have market-based pricing provisions. We normally purchase our feedstocks weeks before manufacturing and selling the refined products. We also purchase refined products produced by others for sale to our customers. Changes in prices that occur between the time we purchase feedstocks or products and when we sell the refined products could have a significant impact on our financial results. Lower margins have in the past, and may in the future, lead us to reduce the amount of refined products we produce, which may reduce our results of operations and cash flows. Significant reductions in margins could require us to impair the carrying value of our assets (such as properties, plants and equipment, inventories or goodwill) and may adversely affect our ability to fund our capital priorities, including share repurchases and dividends. 26 The prices at which we buy our feedstocks are dependent on market conditions that are beyond our control, and changes in supply and demand for the feedstocks we process directly impact the results of our business. We do not produce crude oil and other feedstocks and must purchase all of the feedstocks we process. The prices for crude oil, other feedstocks and refined products can fluctuate based on global, regional and local market conditions, as well as by type and class of products, which can reduce margins and have a significant impact on our refining, wholesale marketing and retail operations, revenues, operating income and cash flows. The ability of the members of OPEC to agree on and to set crude oil price and production controls and changes in trade flows from events such as the war in Eastern Europe have also had, and are likely to continue to have, a significant impact on the market prices of crude oil and certain of our products. In addition, sustained periods of low commodity prices can result in upstream producers significantly curtailing their oil and gas drilling operations, which could substantially delay the production and delivery of volumes of crude oil, natural gas and NGL and negatively impact the results of our Midstream, Refining, and M&S segments. For example, the volume of crude oil and refined petroleum products transported or stored in our pipelines and terminal facilities depends on the demand for and availability of crude oil and refined petroleum products in the areas serviced by our assets. Likewise, our earnings and cash flows would be negatively impacted by a period of sustained lower demand for refined petroleum products, which could lead to lower refinery utilization and result in a decrease in the volumes of refined petroleum product transported through our pipelines and terminal facilities. If a decrease in commodity prices results in declining oil and gas production, then demand for services provided by our Midstream segment may be negatively impacted. The natural gas and NGL gathered, processed, transported, sold and stored by us is delivered into pipelines for further delivery to end-users, including fractionation facilities. Our revenues and cash flows can also increase or decrease as the price of natural gas and NGL fluctuates because of certain contractual arrangements whereby natural gas is purchased for an agreed percentage of proceeds from the sale of the residue gas and/or NGL resulting from processing activities. Lower commodity prices also affect our Chemicals segment, which uses feedstocks that are derivatively produced in the processing of natural gas and refining of crude oil. Those feedstock prices can fluctuate widely for a variety of reasons, including changes in worldwide energy prices and the supply and availability of feedstocks. Due to the highly competitive nature of most of the products sold by our Chemicals segment, market position cannot necessarily be protected by product differentiation or by passing on cost increases to customers. As a result, price increases in raw materials may not correlate with changes in the prices at which petrochemical and plastics products are sold, thereby negatively affecting margins and the results of operations of our Chemicals segment. Additionally, our Renewable Fuels segment is affected by prices and demand for renewable feedstocks. Sustained periods of low prices for renewable fuels or renewable feedstocks due to decreases in demand or production of renewable fuels products could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of our Renewable Fuels segment. Sustained or prolonged declines in commodity prices and other feedstocks may adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity, access to the capital markets, and our ability to fund our capital priorities, including share repurchases and dividends. Changes to government policies relating to renewable feedstocks and renewable fuels that adversely affect programs like the renewable fuels standards program, low-carbon fuels standards and tax credits for processing certain renewable feedstocks impact our financial condition and results of operations. The regulatory framework regarding renewable feedstocks and fuels is constantly evolving. Changes to laws, regulations, policies or standards regarding renewable fuels or the feedstocks used to produce our renewable fuels, elimination or reduction of incentives, as well as the cost of conforming with such updated laws, regulations, policies or standards could negatively impact the results of operations of our Renewable Fuels segment. For example, our Renewable Fuels segment processes renewable feedstocks such as used cooking oil, vegetable oils, and other low-carbon intensity waste oils and byproducts to produce renewable fuels. If certain types of renewable feedstocks are excluded from generating credits, our financial condition and results of operations may be impacted. 27 Our operations are subject to planned and unplanned downtime, business interruptions, and operational hazards, any of which could adversely impact our ability to operate and could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Our operating results are largely dependent on the continued operation of facilities and assets owned and operated by us and our equity affiliates. Interruptions may materially reduce productivity and thus, the profitability, of operations during and after downtime, including for planned turnarounds and scheduled maintenance activities. In the past, we and certain of our equity affiliates also have temporarily shut down facilities due to the threat of severe weather, such as hurricanes. Additionally, the availability of natural gas and electricity necessary to operate our assets can be affected by weather, pipeline interruptions, grid outages, and logistics disruptions, which may also cause us to temporarily curtail or shut down operations. Although we take precautions to ensure and enhance the safety of our operations and minimize the risk of disruptions, our operations are subject to the hazards inherent in chemicals, refining and midstream businesses, such as explosions, fires, refinery, processing facility or pipeline releases or other incidents, power outages, labor disputes, global health crises, restrictive governmental regulation or other natural or man-made disasters, such as geopolitical conflicts and acts of terrorism, including cyber intrusion. The inability to operate facilities or assets due to any of these events could significantly impair our ability to manufacture, process, store or transport products. Any casualty occurrence involving our assets or operations could result in serious personal injury or loss of human life, significant damage to property and equipment, environmental pollution, impairment of operations and substantial losses to us. For assets located near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites and other public gathering areas, the level of damage resulting from these risks could be greater. Damages resulting from an incident involving any of our assets or operations may result in our being named as a defendant in one or more lawsuits asserting potentially substantial claims or in our being assessed potentially substantial remediation fines or penalties by governmental authorities. Should any of these risks materialize at any of our equity affiliates, it could have a material adverse effect on the business and financial condition of the equity affiliate and negatively impact their ability to make future distributions to us. We are subject to interruptions of supply and offtake, as well as increased costs, as a result of our reliance on third-party transportation of crude oil or other feedstocks, NGL, refined petroleum and renewable fuels products. We often utilize the services of third parties to transport crude oil or other feedstocks, NGL, refined petroleum and renewable fuels products to and from our facilities. In addition to our own operational risks, we could experience interruptions of supply or increases in costs to deliver our products to market if the ability to transport is disrupted because of weather events, natural disasters, accidents, governmental regulations, public health crises, armed hostilities, or third-party actions, including protests. A prolonged disruption in our ability to transport crude oil or other feedstocks, NGL, refined petroleum or renewable fuels products to or from one or more of our refineries or other facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In order to maintain or increase throughput levels on our natural gas gathering and transportation pipeline systems and NGL pipelines and the asset utilization rates at our natural gas processing plants, we must continually obtain new supplies. The level of successful drilling activity and prices of, and demand for, natural gas and crude oil, as well as producers’ desire and ability to obtain necessary permits are some of the factors that may affect new supplies of natural gas and NGL. If we are not able to obtain new supplies of natural gas to replace the natural decline in volumes from existing wells or because of competition, throughput on our pipelines and the utilization rates of our treating and processing facilities would decline. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows, and our ability to make cash distributions. 28 Our investments in joint ventures decrease our ability to manage risk. We conduct some of our operations, including parts of our Midstream, Refining and M&S segments, and our entire Chemicals segment, through joint ventures in which we share control with our joint venture partners. Our joint venture partners may have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours or those of the joint venture, or our joint venture participants may be unable to meet their economic or other obligations, and we may be required to fulfill those obligations alone. Failure by us, or an entity in which we have a joint venture interest, to adequately manage the risks associated with any acquisitions or joint ventures could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our joint ventures and, in turn, our business and operations. Public health crises, epidemics and pandemics have had and could in the future have a material adverse effect on our business. Any future widespread health crises could materially and adversely impact our business. Our global operations expose us to risks associated with public health crises and outbreaks of epidemics, pandemics, or contagious diseases, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Even if a virus or other illness does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or health risk may result in reduced demand for our products and materially affect our business. As we cannot predict the duration or scope of any future public health crisis, epidemic or pandemic, the negative financial impact to our results cannot be reasonably estimated and could be material. Factors that will influence the impact on our business and operations include the duration and extent of such events, including the virulence of the infection, the timing of vaccine development and distribution across the world and its impact on economic recovery, the extent of imposed or recommended containment and mitigation measures, including travel restrictions, and their impact on our operations, and the general economic consequences of public health crises, epidemics and pandemics. To the extent any public health crisis, epidemic or pandemic adversely affected or affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks that could adversely affect our business described in this Annual Report, such as risks associated with industry capacity utilization, volatility in the price and availability of raw materials, supply chain interruptions, material adverse changes in customer relationships including any failure of a customer to perform its obligations under agreements with us, and risks associated with worldwide or regional economic conditions. Competition Risks Refining, midstream and marketing competitors that produce their own feedstocks, have more extensive retail outlets, or have greater financial resources may have a competitive advantage. The refining and marketing industry is highly competitive with respect to both feedstock supply and refined petroleum product markets. We compete with many companies for available supplies of crude oil and other feedstocks and for outlets for our refined products. We do not produce any of our crude oil feedstocks. Some of our competitors, however, obtain a portion of their feedstocks from their own production and some have more extensive retail outlets than we have. Competitors that have their own production or extensive retail outlets (and greater brand-name recognition) are at times able to offset losses from refining operations with profits from producing or retailing operations, and may be better positioned to withstand periods of depressed refining margins or feedstock shortages. Some of our competitors also have materially greater financial and other resources than we have. Such competitors have a greater ability to bear the economic risks inherent in all aspects of our business. In addition, we compete with other industries that provide alternative means to satisfy the energy and fuel requirements of our industrial, commercial and individual customers. 29 Our Midstream segment competes for natural gas supplies with other companies that provide midstream gathering and processing, transportation, fractionation and terminaling services, and a failure to grow or maintain throughput levels may negatively impact the results of operations of our business. In order to maintain or increase throughput levels on our natural gas gathering and transportation pipeline systems and NGL pipelines and the asset utilization rates at our natural gas processing plants, we must continually obtain new supplies. The level of successful drilling activity and prices of, and demand for, natural gas and crude oil, as well as producers’ desire and ability to obtain necessary permits are some of the factors that may affect new supplies of natural gas and NGL. If we are not able to obtain new supplies of natural gas to replace the natural decline in volumes from existing wells or because of competition, throughput on our pipelines and the utilization rates of our treating and processing facilities would decline. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Volatility in market demand for our petrochemical and plastics products and midstream transportation services and the risk of overbuild in these industries may negatively impact the results of operations of our businesses. We and our affiliates have made and continue to make significant investments to meet market demand for our products and services, such as investments in midstream infrastructure and construction of new petrochemicals facilities. Similar investments have been made, and additional investments may be made in the future, by us, our competitors or by new entrants to the markets and industries we serve. The success of these investments largely depends on the realization of anticipated market demand, and these projects typically require significant development periods, during which time demand for our products or services may change, or additional investments by competitors may be made that could result in an overbuild of supply. Any of these or other competitive forces could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position or cash flows, as well as our return on capital employed. Strategic Performance and Future Growth Risks Large capital-intensive projects can take many years to complete, and the political and regulatory environments or market conditions could change significantly between the project approval date and the project startup date, negatively impacting expected project returns. Our basis for approving large-scale capital-intensive projects, such as the recent conversion of our San Francisco Refinery into the Rodeo Complex, is the expectation that it will deliver an acceptable rate of return on the capital invested. We base these forecasted project economics on our best estimate of future market conditions including the regulatory and operating environment. Most large-scale projects take several years to complete. During this multi-year period, the political and regulatory environments or other market conditions can change from those we anticipated, and these changes could be significant. Supply chain disruptions may also delay projects or increase costs. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize our expected returns from a large investment in a capital project, and this could negatively impact our results of operations, cash flows and our return on capital employed. 30 Plans we or our joint ventures may have to expand or construct assets or develop new technologies, and plans for our future performance are subject to risks associated with societal and political pressures and other forms of opposition to the future development, transportation and use of petroleum-based and renewables-based fuels. Such risks could adversely impact our business and results of operations. Certain of our plans are based upon the assumption that societal sentiment will continue to enable, and existing regulations will remain in place to allow for, the future development, transportation and use of petroleum-based and renewables-based fuels. A portion of our growth strategy is dependent on our and our joint ventures’ ability to capture growth opportunities in the Midstream, Renewable Fuels and Chemicals segments. Regulatory policy decisions relating to the production, refining, transportation, marketing and use of petroleum-based and renewables-based fuels are subject to political pressures and the influence and protests of environmental and other special interest groups. For example, the construction or expansion of pipelines can involve numerous regulatory, permitting, environmental, political, and legal uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. We may not be able to identify or execute growth projects, and those that are identified may not be completed on schedule or at the budgeted cost, if at all. In addition, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. Delays or cost increases related to capital spending programs or the inability to complete growth projects could negatively impact our reputation, results of operations, cash flows and our return on capital employed. Our Energy Research & Innovation organization works to develop new technologies and solutions focused on advancing our business units, including renewable fuels research. Our efforts to research and develop new technologies are subject to a multitude of factors and conditions, many of which are out of our control. Examples of such factors include evolving government regulation, the pace of changes in technology (including with respect to generative artificial intelligence), the successful development and deployment of existing or new technologies and business solutions on a commercial scale, competition from third parties in developing new technologies and the availability, timing and cost of equipment. The occurrence of these factors may delay or increase the cost of our efforts, which could negatively impact our reputation, results of operations, cash flows and our return on capital employed. Political and economic developments could affect our operations and materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. Actions of federal, state, local and international governments through legislation or regulation, executive order, permit or other review of infrastructure or facility development, and commercial restrictions could delay projects, increase costs, limit development, or otherwise reduce our profitability both in the United States and abroad. Any such actions may affect many aspects of our operations, including: • Establishing maximum margins that can be earned on sales of motor fuels or imposing financial penalties on profits earned above established maximum margins. • Limiting or prohibiting our ability to undertake turnaround or maintenance activities, or to cease operations at our refineries. • Requiring permits or other approvals that may impose unforeseen or unduly burdensome conditions or potentially cause delays in our operations. • Further limiting or prohibiting construction or other activities in environmentally sensitive or other areas. • Requiring increased capital costs to construct, maintain or upgrade equipment, facilities or infrastructure. • Restricting the locations where we may construct facilities or requiring the relocation of facilities. 31 For example, in March 2023, the California legislature adopted Senate Bill No. 2 (such statute, together with any regulations contemplated or issued thereunder, SBx 1-2), which, among other things, (i) authorizes the establishment of a maximum gross gasoline refining margin (maximum margin) and the imposition of a financial penalty for profits above the maximum margin, (ii) significantly expands reporting obligations relating to the maintenance and business of our California facilities, which includes reporting requirements to the California Energy Commission (CEC) for all participants in the transportation fuels industry supply chain in California, (iii) creates the Division of Petroleum Market Oversight within the CEC to analyze the data provided under SBx 1-2, and (iv) authorizes the CEC to regulate the timing and other aspects of facility turnaround and other maintenance activities in certain instances. The CEC is currently in rulemaking with respect to various aspects of SBx 1-2, and the potential implementation of a financial penalty or any restrictions or delays on our ability to undertake turnaround or other maintenance activities creates uncertainty due to the potential adverse effects on our refining, marketing, renewable and midstream operations in California, which may be material to our results of operations, financial condition, profitability and cash flows. We anticipate that other jurisdictions may contemplate similarly focused legislation or actions. The timing and impacts of SBx 1-2 and any other similarly focused legislation or actions are subject to considerable uncertainty due to a number of factors, including technological and economic feasibility, legal challenges, and potential changes in law, regulation, or policy, and it is not currently possible to predict the ultimate effects of these matters and developments, but they may be significant. For example, adverse effects on the financial performance of our operations in the state of California or the useful lives of the assets related to such operations may result in the recognition of material asset impairment charges and asset retirement obligations. Furthermore, the U.S. government can prevent or restrict us from doing business in foreign countries and from doing business with entities affiliated with foreign governments, which can include state oil companies and U.S. subsidiaries of those companies. The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security matters. The effect of any such OFAC sanctions could disrupt transactions with or operations involving entities affiliated with sanctioned countries, and could limit our ability to obtain optimum crude slates and other feedstocks and effectively distribute refined products. We may face other regulatory changes in the U.S. including, but not limited to, the enactment of tax law changes that adversely affect our industry, tariffs on imported material, components and feedstocks and retaliatory tariffs imposed by other countries on U.S. made goods, new emissions standards, restrictive flaring regulations, and more stringent requirements for environmental impact studies and reviews. Hostilities in the Middle East, Eastern Europe or elsewhere or the occurrence or threat of future terrorist attacks could adversely affect the economies of the U.S. and other countries. Other political and economic risks include global health crises; financial market turmoil; economic volatility and global economic slowdown; currency exchange rate fluctuations; short-term and long-term inflationary pressures; rising or prolonged periods of high interest rates; import or export restrictions and changes in trade regulations; supply chain disruptions; civil unrest and other political risks; limitations in the availability of labor to develop, staff and manage operations; and potentially adverse tax developments. If any of these events occur, our businesses and results of operations may be adversely affected. We may not be able to effectively identify, whether through acquisition, investment or development, lower-carbon opportunities on favorable terms, or at all, and failure to do so could limit our growth, our ability to participate in the energy transition, and our ability to meet our environmental goals and targets. Part of our strategy includes capturing growth opportunities in our businesses to further advance our participation in the energy transition and meet our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity reduction targets. This strategy depends, in part, on our ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition and investment opportunities and develop and commercialize new technologies. The number of lower-carbon opportunities may be limited, and we will compete with other energy companies for these limited opportunities, which could make them more expensive and the returns for our business less attractive and possibly cause us to refrain from making certain investments at all. Further, certain lower-carbon opportunities will depend on technological and other advancements that may not be within our control and may not come to fruition or be economically feasible in the near term. Any new opportunities also may depend on the viability of new assets or businesses that are contingent on public policy mechanisms including investment tax credits, subsidies, renewable portfolio standards and carbon trading plans. 32 These mechanisms have been implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable energy and other clean infrastructure technologies, but consistent regulatory policy is uncertain. The availability and continuation of public policy support mechanisms will drive a significant part of the economics and viability of lower-carbon and clean energy investments generally, as well as our participation in them. If we are unable to identify and consummate acquisitions and investments that meet our minimum returns hurdle, our ability to execute a portion of our growth strategy and meet our environmental goals may be impeded. Our business could be negatively impacted as a result of shareholder activism. Publicly traded companies are increasingly subject to campaigns by activist shareholders advocating corporate actions such as operational, governance or management changes, or sales of assets or entire segments. The Company has been and may again be subject to shareholder activism and the corporate actions advocated by the shareholder activist that may not align with the Company’s current business strategies and the best interests of all of the Company’s shareholders. The actions of activist shareholders may cause fluctuations in our stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals or prospects of our business. In addition, responding to the actions of activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupting our business and diverting the attention of our Board of Directors and management from pursuing our business strategies. Legal, Regulatory, and Environmental, Climate and Weather Risks We are subject to a variety of legal proceedings and other claims arising out of our operations which may adversely impact our business and financial condition. From time to time, we are party to or otherwise involved in actual or threatened litigation, claims, governmental inspections or investigations and other legal matters arising out of our operations in the normal course of business or otherwise. We are currently involved in various legal proceedings that are not yet fully resolved, and additional claims may arise in the future. The outcomes of these matters are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. Additionally, the recent trend of outside investment in legal claims has enabled plaintiffs to reduce their exposure to risk and pursue final verdicts for claims that may in the past have settled. Determining legal reserves or possible losses for ongoing legal proceedings involves judgment and may not reflect the full range of uncertainties and unpredictable outcomes. Until the final resolution of such matters, we may be exposed to losses in excess of the amount recorded, and such amounts could be material and may exceed any applicable insurance coverage. Should any of our estimates and assumptions change or prove to have been incorrect, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and cash flows. See Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Climate change and severe weather may adversely affect our and our joint ventures’ facilities and ongoing operations. The potential physical effects of climate change and severe weather, as well as other chronic physical effects such as water shortages and rising sea levels, on our operations are highly uncertain and depend upon the unique geographic and environmental factors present. We have systems in place to manage potential acute physical risks, including those that may be caused by climate change, but such events could have an adverse effect on our assets and operations. Examples of potential physical risks include floods, hurricane-force winds, severe storms, droughts, heat waves, earthquakes, wildfires, freezing temperatures and snowstorms, as well as rising sea levels at our coastal facilities. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to protect our assets from physical risks and to employ processes, to the extent available, to mitigate such risks. We operate facilities located in coastal regions of the United States, which have been impacted by hurricanes that have required us to temporarily, or even permanently, shut down operations at those sites. CPChem also operates facilities on the Gulf Coast and has had to temporarily shut down sites in the past as a result of hurricanes. Any extreme weather events or rising sea levels may disrupt the ability to operate our facilities located near coastal areas or to transport crude oil, refined petroleum or petrochemical and plastics products in these areas. Extended periods of such disruption could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. We could also incur substantial costs to prevent or repair damage to these facilities. Finally, depending on the severity and duration of any extreme weather events or climate conditions, our operations may need to be modified and material costs incurred, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 33 There are certain environmental hazards and risks inherent in our operations that could adversely affect those operations and our financial results. The operation of facilities, such as refineries, power plants, fractionators, pipelines, terminals and vessels is inherently subject to the risks of spills, discharges or other inadvertent releases of petroleum, refined product or hazardous substances. If any of these events had previously occurred or occurs in the future in connection with the operation or maintenance of any of our assets, or in connection with any facilities that receive our wastes or byproducts for treatment or disposal, other than events for which we are indemnified, we could be liable for all costs and penalties associated with their remediation under federal, state, local and international environmental laws or at common law, and could be liable for property damage to third parties caused by contamination from releases and spills. We expect to continue to incur substantial capital expenditures and operating costs to comply with existing and future environmental laws and regulations. Our business is subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations continue to increase in both number and complexity and affect our operations with respect to, among other things: • The discharge of pollutants into the environment. • Emissions into the atmosphere, such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and mercury emissions, and GHG emissions, as they are, or may become, regulated. • The quantity of renewable fuels that must be blended into motor fuels. • The handling, use, storage, transportation, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials and hazardous and nonhazardous wastes. • The dismantlement and abandonment of our facilities and restoration of our properties at the end of their useful lives. To the extent these expenditures, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of our products and services, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods could be materially adversely affected. Factors associated with climate change legislation or regulation could result in increased operating costs, reduce demand for the refined petroleum products we produce and could otherwise have a material impact on our business. Currently, multiple legislative and regulatory measures to address GHG and other emissions are in various phases of consideration, promulgation, implementation or reversal. These include actions to develop international, federal, regional or statewide programs, which could require reductions in our GHG or other emissions, establish a carbon tax and decrease the demand for our refined products. Requiring reductions in these emissions could result in increased costs to (i) operate and maintain our facilities, (ii) install new emission controls at our facilities and (iii) administer and manage any emissions programs, including acquiring emission credits or allotments. International climate change-related efforts, such as the 2015 United Nations Conference on Climate Change, which led to the creation of the Paris Agreement, and the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, may impact the regulatory framework of states whose policies directly influence our present and future operations. In January 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and it is expected that President Trump and the Republican-led Congress will diverge from the previous administration’s positions and GHG commitments. However, future emission reduction targets and other provisions of legislative or regulatory initiatives and policies enacted in the future by the United States could be brought by future administrations or, in the absence of federal action, states may become more active and focused on taking legislative or regulatory actions aimed at climate change and minimizing GHG emissions. 34 States have been and are expected to continue to adopt new and amended legislative and regulatory measures regarding climate change and GHG emissions controls. For example, in 2017, the California state legislature adopted Assembly Bill 398, which provides direction and parameters on utilizing cap and trade after 2020 to meet the 40% reduction target for GHG emissions from 1990 levels by 2030 specified in Senate Bill 32. Compliance with the cap and trade program is demonstrated through a market-based credit system. Additionally, on August 25, 2022, the CARB adopted regulations that effectively ban the in-state sales of new cars containing internal combustion engines beginning in 2035. Also, on December 15, 2022, CARB adopted its “2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality,” which purports to provide a road map for California to achieve carbon neutrality (which it defines as removing as many carbon emissions from the atmosphere as it emits) by year 2045. Other states are proposing, or have already promulgated, low carbon fuel standards or similar initiatives to reduce emissions from the transportation sector. If we are unable to pass the costs of compliance on to our customers, sufficient credits are unavailable for purchase, we have to pay a significantly higher price for credits, or if we are otherwise unable to meet our compliance obligation, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, certain states have recently passed legislation seeking to recover financial damages allegedly associated with climate change from fossil fuel companies like the Vermont Climate Superfund Act passed by the Vermont Legislature in May 2024. The future of the U.S.’s climate change strategy and the impact to our industry and operations due to further GHG regulation is unknown at this time. Federal, regional and state climate change and air emissions goals and regulatory programs are complex, subject to change and impose considerable uncertainty due to a number of factors including technological feasibility, legal challenges and potential changes in federal policy. Increasing concerns about climate change and carbon intensity have resulted in heightened societal awareness and a number of international and national measures to limit GHG emissions. We cannot determine what final regulations will be enacted, modified or reversed, or whether stricter investor pressure can be expected in the future. Any of these changes may have a material adverse impact on our business or financial condition. Increased regulation of the fossil fuel industry, particularly with respect to hydraulic fracturing, could result in reductions or delays in the production of crude oil and natural gas, which could adversely impact our results of operations. Most of the crude oil and natural gas production of our Midstream segment’s customers is being produced from unconventional oil shale reservoirs. These reservoirs require hydraulic fracturing completion processes to release the hydrocarbons from the rock so they can flow through casing to the surface. Hydraulic fracturing involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into a formation to stimulate hydrocarbon production. The EPA, as well as several state agencies, commenced studies and/or convened hearings regarding the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing activities. At the same time, certain environmental groups have suggested that additional laws may be needed to more closely and uniformly regulate the hydraulic fracturing process, and legislation has been proposed to provide for such regulation. In addition, some communities have adopted measures to ban hydraulic fracturing in their communities. Also, certain interest groups have proposed ballot initiatives and constitutional amendments designed to restrict crude oil and natural gas development. If ballot initiatives, local, state, or national restrictions or prohibitions are adopted and result in more stringent limitations on the production and development of crude oil and natural gas, we may incur significant costs to comply with the requirements, and producers may experience delays or curtailment in the permitting or pursuit of exploration, development or production activities. Such compliance costs and delays, curtailments, limitations or prohibitions could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition to these proposed ballot initiatives and constitutional amendments, municipalities, such as the City of Los Angeles, have already enacted or contemplate enacting complete or partial bans on oil and gas exploration and production activities. If legislative and regulatory initiatives cause a material decrease in the drilling of new wells and related servicing activities, it may reduce crude oil, natural gas and NGL supplies, negatively affecting the volume of products available to our Midstream segment and increasing feedstock prices for our Chemicals and Refining segments, resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. 35 Compliance with the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) could adversely affect our financial results. The EPA has implemented the RFS pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. The RFS program sets annual renewable volume obligation (RVO) requirements for the quantity of renewable fuels, such as ethanol, that must be blended into motor fuels consumed in the United States. To provide certain flexibility in compliance options available to the industry, a Renewable Identification Number (RIN) is assigned to each gallon of renewable fuel produced in, or imported into, the United States. As a producer of petroleum-based motor fuels, we are obligated to blend renewable fuels into the products we produce at a rate that is at least commensurate to the EPA’s RVO requirements and, to the extent we do not, we must purchase RINs in the open market to satisfy our obligation under the RFS program. We are exposed to the volatility in the market price of RINs. We cannot predict the future prices of RINs. RINs prices are dependent upon a variety of factors, including EPA regulations, the availability of RINs for purchase, and levels of transportation fuels produced, which can vary significantly from quarter to quarter. If sufficient RINs are unavailable for purchase, if we have to pay a significantly higher price for RINs, if we purchase RINs that are ultimately determined to be invalid, or if we are otherwise unable to meet the EPA’s RVO requirements, including because the EPA mandates a blending quantity of renewable fuel that exceeds the amount that is commercially feasible to blend into motor fuel (a situation commonly referred to as “the blend wall”), our operations could be materially adversely impacted, up to and including a reduction in produced motor fuel for sale in the United States. These factors could result in a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Societal, technological, political and scientific developments around emissions and fuel efficiency may decrease demand for petroleum-based fuels. Developments aimed at reducing GHG emissions may decrease the demand or increase the cost for our petroleum-based fuels. Societal attitudes toward these products and their relationship to the environment may significantly affect our effectiveness in marketing our products. Government efforts to steer the public toward non-petroleum-based fuel dependent modes of transportation may foster a negative perception toward petroleum products or increase costs of our products, thus affecting the public’s attitude toward our major products. Advanced technology and increased use of vehicles that do not use petroleum-based transportation fuels or that are powered by hybrid engines would reduce demand for the motor fuel we produce. We may also incur increased production costs, which we may not be able to pass along to our customers. Additionally, renewable fuels, alternative energy mandates and energy conservation efforts could reduce demand for refined petroleum products. Tax incentives and other subsidies can make renewable fuels and alternative energy more competitive with refined petroleum products than they otherwise might be, which may reduce refined petroleum product margins and hinder the ability of refined petroleum products to compete with renewable fuels. The competition for renewable fuels feedstocks may also increase, negatively impacting the availability of such feedstocks or increasing their cost. These developments could potentially have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Continuing political and social concerns about climate change and other Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters may result in changes to our business and significant expenditures, including litigation-related expenses. Increasing attention to global climate change has resulted in increased investor attention and an increased risk of public and private litigation, which could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business. Additionally, cities, counties, and other governmental entities in several states in the U.S. began filing lawsuits against energy companies in 2017, including Phillips 66, seeking damages allegedly associated with climate change, and the plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and abatement under various tort theories. Similar lawsuits may be filed in other jurisdictions. While we believe these lawsuits are an inappropriate vehicle to address the challenges associated with climate change and will vigorously defend against them, the ultimate outcome and impact to us of any such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and we could incur substantial legal costs associated with defending these and similar lawsuits in the future. 36 Additionally, governments and private parties are also increasingly filing lawsuits or initiating regulatory action based on allegations that certain public statements regarding climate change and other ESG-related matters and practices by companies are false or misleading “greenwashing” that violate deceptive trade practices and consumer protection statutes. Such claims are included in lawsuits filed against energy companies, including Phillips 66. Such lawsuits present a high degree of uncertainty regarding the extent to which energy companies face an increased risk of liability stemming from climate change or ESG disclosures and practices. Efforts have also been made by governments and private parties to shut down energy assets by challenging operating permits, the validity of easements or the compliance with easement conditions. Lawsuits and/or regulatory proceedings or actions of this nature could result in interruptions to construction or operations of current or future projects, delays in completing those projects and/or increased project costs, all of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. These risks may result in unexpected costs, negative sentiments about our company, disruptions in our operations, increases to our operating expenses and reduced demand for our products, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Increased concerns regarding plastic waste in the environment, consumers selectively reducing their consumption of plastic products due to recycling concerns, or new or more restrictive regulations and rules related to plastic waste could reduce demand for CPChem’s plastic products and could negatively impact our equity interest. There is a growing concern with the accumulation of plastic, including microplastics, and other packaging waste in the environment. Additionally, plastics have faced increased public backlash and scrutiny. Policy measures to address this concern are being discussed or implemented by governments at all levels. In addition, a host of single-use plastic bans and taxes have been passed by countries around the world and counties and municipalities throughout the U.S. Increased regulation of, or prohibition on, the use of certain plastic products could reduce demand for certain products CPChem produces, which could negatively impact its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, thereby negatively impacting our equity earnings by reducing the cash distributions that we receive from CPChem. Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Risks Cybersecurity incidents and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer. Our information technology and infrastructure, or information technology and infrastructure of our third-party service providers (e.g., cloud-based service providers), may be vulnerable to attacks by malicious actors or breached due to human error, malfeasance or other disruptions, including ransomware and other malware, phishing and social engineering schemes, deepfakes, malicious software, data privacy incidents, insiders or others with authorized access, attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and systems, and other cybersecurity incidents. Any such incidents could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such unauthorized access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in one or more of the following outcomes: (i) unauthorized access to or a loss or misuse of intellectual property, proprietary information, or employee, customer or vendor data; (ii) public disclosure of sensitive information; (iii) increased costs to prevent, respond to, or mitigate cybersecurity events, such as deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees, and engaging third-party experts and consultants; (iv) systems interruption; (v) disruption of our business operations; (vi) remediation costs for repairs of system damage, or regulatory fines or penalties; (vii) reputational damage that adversely affects customer or investor confidence; (viii) exposure to legal liability; and (ix) damage to our competitiveness, stock price, and long-term shareholder value. Generative artificial intelligence has contributed to an increase in the prevalence of such attacks and threats, expanding our potential exposure to disruptions. Any of the foregoing can be exacerbated by a delay or failure to detect a cybersecurity incident or the full extent of such incident. 37 Further, we have exposure to cybersecurity incidents and the negative impacts of such incidents related to our critical data and proprietary information housed on third-party IT systems, including cloud-based systems. Additionally, authorized third-party IT systems or software can be compromised and used to gain access or introduce malware to our IT systems that can materially impact our business. Although we devote significant resources to prevent cybersecurity incidents and protect our system and data, we have experienced actual and attempted cybersecurity incidents, and while we do not believe that any of these incidents has had a material effect on our business, operations or financial condition, it is possible that a future incident may have such an effect. A cybersecurity incident may also result in legal claims or proceedings against us by our shareholders, employees, customers, vendors, and governmental authorities (U.S. and non-U.S.). Our infrastructure protection technologies and disaster recovery plans may not be able to prevent a technology systems breach or systems failure, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. Furthermore, the continuing and evolving threat of cyberattacks has resulted in increased regulatory focus on prevention. To the extent we face increased regulatory requirements, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to meet such requirements. Increasing regulatory focus on privacy and cybersecurity issues and expanding laws could expose us to increased liability, subject us to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations that could significantly and adversely affect our business. Along with our own data and information collected in the normal course of our business, we and our partners collect and retain certain data that is subject to specific laws and regulations. The transfer and use of this data both domestically and across international borders is becoming increasingly complex. This data is subject to governmental regulation at the federal, state, international, national, provincial and local levels in many areas of our business, including data privacy and security laws such as the European Union (EU) and United Kingdom (UK) versions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The GDPR applies to the transfer and processing of personal data of those who live in the EU or UK, respectively. As interpretation and enforcement of the GDPR evolves, it creates a range of new compliance obligations, which could cause us to incur additional costs. Failure to comply could result in significant penalties that may materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and cash flows. The CCPA, which came into effect on January 1, 2020, gives California residents specific rights in relation to their personal information, requires that companies take certain actions, including notifications for security incidents and may apply to activities regarding personal information that is collected by us, directly or indirectly, from California residents. As interpretation and enforcement of the CCPA evolves, it creates a range of new compliance obligations, with the possibility for significant financial penalties for noncompliance that may materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations and cash flows. Comprehensive privacy laws with some similarities to the CCPA have been proposed or passed at the U.S. federal and state levels, such as the Colorado Privacy Act. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general are interpreting federal and state consumer protection laws to impose standards for the online collection, use, dissemination and security of data as well as requiring disclosures about these practices. Existing and potential future data privacy laws pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate our costs. Any failure by us to comply with these laws and regulations, including as a result of a security or privacy breach, could result in significant penalties and liabilities for us. Additionally, if we acquire a company that has violated or is not in compliance with applicable data protection laws, we may incur significant liabilities and penalties as a result. 38 Indebtedness, Capital Markets and Financial Risks Uncertainty and illiquidity in credit and capital markets can impair our ability to obtain credit and financing on acceptable terms and can adversely affect the financial strength of our business partners. Our ability to obtain credit and capital depends in large measure on the state of the credit and capital markets, which is subject to factors beyond our control. Our ability to access credit and capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, access to those markets, which could constrain our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. In addition, the cost and availability of debt and equity financing may be adversely impacted by unstable or illiquid market conditions. Protracted uncertainty and illiquidity in these markets also could have an adverse impact on our lenders, commodity transaction counterparties, or our customers, preventing them from meeting their obligations to us. From time to time, our cash needs may exceed our available cash and our business could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to supplement the cash generated from our operations with proceeds from financing activities. Uncertainty and illiquidity in financial markets may materially impact the ability of the participating financial institutions to fund their commitments to us under our liquidity facilities that are supported by a broad syndicate of financial institutions. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain the full amount of the funds available under our liquidity facilities to satisfy our cash requirements, and our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial position. Negative sentiment towards fossil fuels and increased attention to environmental and social matters, including climate change, could adversely affect our business, the market price for our securities and our access to and cost of capital. There have been efforts in recent years aimed at the investment community, including investment advisors, sovereign wealth funds, public pension funds, universities, and other groups, to promote the divestment of fossil fuel companies, as well as to pressure lenders, insurers, and other financial services companies to limit or curtail activities with fossil fuel companies. If these or similar efforts are continued, the market price of our securities, our ability to access capital markets or insure our operations, and our cost of capital may be negatively impacted. Members of the investment community are also increasing their focus on environmental and social (E&S) matters, including practices related to GHG emissions, climate change, business resilience, diversity and inclusion, environmental justice and other E&S matters. As a result, we may face increasing pressure regarding our E&S disclosures and practices. Additionally, members of the investment community may screen companies such as ours for E&S performance before investing in our stock or participating in our financing activities. If we are unable to meet the E&S standards set by these investors, we may lose investors, our stock price may be negatively impacted, our access to capital markets and lenders may be curtailed, and our reputation may be negatively affected. Our efforts to accurately report on E&S-related issues expose us to operational, reputational, financial, legal, and other risks. Standards for tracking and reporting on E&S-related matters, including climate-related matters, have not been harmonized and continue to evolve. Processes and controls for reporting on E&S matters are subject to evolving and disparate standards of identification, measurement, and reporting on such metrics, including any climate change and E&S-related public company disclosure requirements adopted by the SEC or government agencies of other jurisdictions, and such standards may change over time, which could result in significant revisions to our current E&S practices and disclosures. 39 Our published GHG emissions intensity reduction goals and other E&S targets we may set in the future could negatively impact our business. We have announced targets to reduce our Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions intensity from our operations by 30% and Scope 3 GHG emissions intensity of our energy products by 15% by 2030, and a target to reduce our Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions intensity by 50% by 2050, in each case as compared to baseline 2019 levels. Our ability to achieve these goals depends on many factors, many of which are beyond our control, such as advancements that enable broad commercial deployment and use of lower-carbon technologies; global policies that fund and incentivize the development of a lower-carbon energy system; changes in consumer behavior and energy choices; the availability of materials throughout the supply chain; evolving regulatory requirements; competitor actions; the availability of renewable feedstocks; and acquisition and divestiture activities. Further, the standards for tracking and reporting on GHG emissions have not been harmonized and continue to evolve. Our selection of disclosure frameworks that seek to align with various reporting standards may change from time to time and may result in a lack of comparative data from period to period. In addition, our processes and controls may not always align with evolving voluntary standards for identifying, measuring, and reporting GHG emissions, our interpretation of reporting standards may differ from those of others, and such standards may change over time, any of which could result in significant revisions to our goals or reported progress in achieving such goals. The pursuit of these targets, and any other climate-related or E&S goals we may announce, may increase our costs, require us to purchase emissions credits or offsets, or limit or negatively impact our business plans. Further, our pursuit of, or any failure or perceived failure to achieve such goals and targets within the timelines that we announce, or at all, could cause reputational harm, negatively impact our stock price and access to and cost of capital, and expose us to enforcement or litigation, among other negative impacts. We do not fully insure against all potential losses, including those from extreme weather events or natural disasters, and, therefore, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected by unexpected or underinsured liabilities and increased costs. We maintain insurance coverage in amounts we believe to be prudent, including against many, but not all, potential liabilities arising from operating hazards. We rely on existing liquidity, financial resources and borrowing capacity to meet short-term obligations that would result from uninsured or underinsured liabilities arising from operating hazards, including but not limited to, explosions, fires, refinery or pipeline releases or other incidents involving our assets or operations, including weather events or natural disasters, which could reduce the funds available to us for capital and investment spending and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Deterioration in our credit profile could increase our costs of borrowing money, limit our access to the capital markets and commercial credit, and could trigger co-venturer rights under joint venture arrangements. Our credit ratings could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in its judgment, the circumstances warrant. If a rating agency were to downgrade our rating below investment grade, our borrowing costs would increase, and our funding sources could decrease. This could require us to provide collateral, or other forms of security, which would increase our costs and restrict operational and financial flexibility. In addition, failure by Phillips 66 to maintain an investment grade rating could affect its business relationships with suppliers and operating partners. For example, Phillips 66’s agreement with Chevron Corporation (Chevron) regarding CPChem permits Chevron to buy Phillips 66’s 50% interest in CPChem for fair market value if Phillips 66 experiences a change in control or if both Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. lower their credit ratings below investment grade and the credit rating from either rating agency remains below investment grade for 365 days thereafter, with fair market value determined by agreement or by nationally recognized investment banks. As a result of these factors, a downgrade of credit ratings could have a material adverse impact on Phillips 66’s future operations and financial position. 40 The level of returns on pension and postretirement plan assets and the actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect our earnings and cash flows in future periods. Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations and the expected return on plan assets for our pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by us based on a variety of independent sources of market information and in consultation with outside actuaries. If we determine that changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care cost trend rate, our future pension and postretirement benefit expenses and funding requirements could increase. In addition, several factors could cause actual results to differ significantly from the actuarial assumptions that we use. Funding obligations are determined based on the value of assets and liabilities on a specific date as required under relevant regulations. Future pension funding requirements, and the timing of funding payments, could be affected by legislation enacted by governmental authorities. We may incur losses as a result of our forward contracts and derivative transactions. We currently use commodity derivative instruments, and we expect to use them in the future. If the instruments we utilize to hedge our exposure to various types of risk are not effective, we may incur losses. Derivative transactions involve the risk that counterparties may be unable to satisfy their obligations to us. The risk of counterparty default is heightened in a poor economic environment. In addition, we may be required to incur additional costs in connection with future regulation of derivative instruments to the extent it is applicable to us. We are subject to continuing contingent liabilities of ConocoPhillips following the separation. Further, ConocoPhillips has indemnified us for certain matters, but may not be able to satisfy its obligations to us in the future. In connection with our separation from ConocoPhillips in 2012, we entered into an Indemnification and Release Agreement and certain other agreements pursuant to which ConocoPhillips agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities, and we agreed to indemnify ConocoPhillips for certain liabilities. Indemnities that we may be required to provide are not subject to any cap and may be significant. Third parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that ConocoPhillips has agreed to retain. Further, the indemnity from ConocoPhillips may not be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, and ConocoPhillips may not be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. 41 Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. Item 1C. CYBERSECURITY Management has implemented a comprehensive cybersecurity program that is designed to protect our information, and that of our customers and suppliers, against cybersecurity threats that may materially and adversely affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our information systems. Our cybersecurity program includes processes and standards that leverage recognized cybersecurity frameworks, industry best practices and guidance from U.S. Government security directives that focus on cybersecurity and critical infrastructure. Cybersecurity Governance Board of Directors The Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors (the Audit and Finance Committee) is responsible for overseeing the company’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program, including oversight of the processes management has implemented to assess, identify and manage risks associated with cybersecurity and information technology. In carrying out this responsibility, the Audit and Finance Committee regularly receives written reports from the company’s Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and periodic briefings from the CISO. These presentations may address a wide range of topics, such as the results of recent vulnerability assessments and third-party independent reviews, changes to the threat environment, technological trends and other recent developments, and peer and other third-party benchmarking. The Audit and Finance Committee makes regular reports to the Board of Directors on data protection and cybersecurity matters. The company maintains an Enterprise Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan (ECIRP) which provides the framework for management’s response to cyber-related incidents and escalation protocols, including, when appropriate, prompt reporting to the Board of Directors. Management At the management level, our CISO has extensive cybersecurity knowledge and skills gained from work experience at the company and with a law enforcement agency, as well as from obtaining advanced professional certifications. The CISO is responsible for the assessment and management of risks from cybersecurity threats and leads a team responsible for implementing, monitoring, and maintaining cybersecurity and data protection practices across the company. The individuals who report directly to our CISO possess relevant educational and industry experience in the areas of cyber threat hunting and intelligence, digital standards, data privacy, cyber training, and cybersecurity operations center management. In addition to our internal cybersecurity capabilities, we also regularly engage consultants, or other third parties to assist with assessing, identifying, and managing cybersecurity risks. The CISO receives reports on cybersecurity threats on an ongoing basis, and in conjunction with management, regularly reviews risk management measures implemented by the company to identify, assess and mitigate data protection and cybersecurity risks. Our CISO works closely with the company’s Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property and Data Protection, to oversee compliance with legal, regulatory and contractual security requirements. 42 Risk Management and Strategy On an annual basis, we conduct an evaluation of our cybersecurity risks as part of the ERM program. Through the ERM program, the CISO and other internal subject matter experts review potential cybersecurity threat scenarios, such as data theft, cash theft, widespread outages and business disruptions, and the potential consequences of such scenarios. The results of the risk assessment are shared with management and the Audit and Finance Committee. We have a continuous monitoring program to detect and respond to potential cybersecurity threats in real-time. Log data from our technical controls are collected, aggregated, and correlated in a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system that identifies and categorizes events, as well as analyzes them. If the SIEM system identifies a potential security event, it can direct other controls to stop the activity and also generate alerts for detection and response. These alerts are monitored by a managed security service provider that augments our dedicated internal Security Operations Center team. In addition, we utilize a third-party risk management (TPRM) program to identify, assess, monitor, and mitigate risks associated with third-party relationships, including cybersecurity risks. The TPRM program is designed to help ensure proper controls and measures are in place to manage the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with third parties. Our policies and procedures aid in the governance from initial due diligence, selection, and contracting to termination. With respect to cybersecurity incident response, our ECIRP provides a documented framework for responding to cybersecurity incidents. The ECIRP sets out a coordinated approach to investigating, containing, documenting and mitigating incidents, including reporting findings and keeping senior management and other key stakeholders informed and involved as appropriate. Our Internal Audit organization performs audits of our cybersecurity program. Each year, we conduct audits across the company’s information technology and operation technology infrastructure, networks, systems, applications, and operational processes and procedures to evaluate compliance with our information security policies and standards. Process control network assurance audits are conducted on a rotating schedule that is risk-based and provides coverage across each major operational business area no greater than five years. In addition to the internal audits, we also engage external cybersecurity experts and auditors to conduct assessments, penetration testing, and cybersecurity maturity assessments. Although we have experienced actual and attempted cybersecurity events and incidents on our networks and systems in the past, we do not believe that the risks from any of these events or incidents, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected our business, operations, or financial condition, or are reasonably likely to have such an effect. For more information concerning cybersecurity risks we face, see the discussion in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this report. Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS From time to time, we may be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. Additionally, we have elected a $1 million threshold to disclose certain proceedings arising under federal, state or local environmental laws when a governmental authority is a party to the proceedings. During the fourth quarter of 2024, two new matters arose, and there were material developments with respect to two matters previously reported, that resolved those matters, which are all described below. Except as otherwise set forth herein, we do not currently believe that the eventual outcome of any matters previously reported, but still unresolved, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Further, our U.S. refineries are implementing two separate consent decrees, regarding alleged violations of the Federal Clean Air Act, with the EPA, five states and one local air pollution agency. Some of the requirements and limitations contained in the decrees provide for stipulated penalties for violations. Stipulated penalties under the decrees are not automatic, but must be requested by one of the agency signatories. As part of periodic reports under the decrees or other reports required by permits or regulations, we occasionally report matters that could be subject to a request for stipulated penalties. If a specific request for stipulated penalties meeting the reporting threshold set forth in SEC rules is made pursuant to these decrees based on a given reported exceedance, we will separately report that matter and the amount of the proposed penalty. 43 New Matters In December 2024, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) offered to settle 172 notices of alleged violations of air regulations by the Rodeo Complex dating back to 2016. Settlement negotiations are underway, and resolution is expected in 2025. In November 2024, Phillips 66 Company received an indictment from a federal grand jury in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging two counts of negligently violating the Clean Water Act and four counts of knowingly violating the Clean Water Act at its Los Angeles Refinery. If convicted of all charges, Phillips 66 would face a statutory maximum fine exceeding $1 million. The matter relates to alleged wastewater permit violations and is ongoing. Matters Previously Reported (unresolved or resolved since the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024) As described further in the “Legal Proceedings” section of Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, on February 17, 2022, Propel Fuels, Inc. (Propel Fuels) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (the Propel Court), alleging that Phillips 66 Company misappropriated trade secrets related to Propel Fuels’ renewable fuels business. On October 16, 2024, a jury returned a verdict against Phillips 66 Company for $604.9 million in compensatory damages and issued a willfulness finding. In 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on motions anticipated to be filed by Propel Fuels seeking exemplary damages and attorneys’ fees. Propel Fuels has asked the Propel Court to grant treble damages and Phillips 66 Company has filed a brief in opposition to that request. Also in 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on Phillips 66 Company’s motions for a judgment in its favor as a matter of law, or in the alternative to reduce the jury’s verdict or to grant a new trial. Phillips 66 Company denies any wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend its position. While Phillips 66 Company believes the jury verdict is not legally or factually supported and intends to pursue post-judgment remedies and file an appeal, there can be no assurances that such defense efforts will be successful. To the extent Phillips 66 Company is required to pay exemplary damages, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. On August 30, 2024, the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment, Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) sent DCP Operating Company, LP (DCP) a Compliance Order on Consent alleging violations at its Enterprise Compressor Station of AQCC Regulation 7 and DCP’s permit conditions. This matter was resolved in the fourth quarter of 2024 with an agreement to pay a penalty and an economic benefit reimbursement totaling less than $1 million. On May 12, 2023, the EPA, Region 6, sent DCP a Notice of Violation and Opportunity to Confer regarding alleged violations of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart OOOOa (NOV). The NOV alleged non-compliances at the Artesia and Eunice Natural Gas Processing Plants in New Mexico. This matter was resolved in the fourth quarter of 2024 with an agreement to implement scheduled corrective actions and pay a penalty of $1.9 million. Dakota Access, LLC (Dakota Access) and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Company, LLC (ETCO) See “Dakota Access, LLC (Dakota Access) and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Company, LLC (ETCO)” section of Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long- Term Receivables and Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding Legal Proceedings and other regulatory actions. Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 44 INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Name Position Held Age* Mark E. Lashier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 63 Kevin J. Mitchell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 58 Donald A. Baldridge Executive Vice President, Midstream and Chemicals 55 Zhanna Golodryga Executive Vice President, Emerging Energy and Sustainability 69 Richard G. Harbison Executive Vice President, Refining 59 Brian M. Mandell Executive Vice President, Marketing and Commercial 61 Vanessa L. Allen Sutherland Executive Vice President, Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary 53 Ann M. Kluppel Vice President and Controller 57 * As of February 21, 2025. There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers named above or any member of our Board of Directors. The Board of Directors annually elects the officers to serve until a successor is elected and qualified or as otherwise provided in our By-Laws. Set forth below is the name, title and period of service of each executive officer identified above over the last five years. Mark E. Lashier is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since May 2024. Previously, Mr. Lashier served Phillips 66 as President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2022 to May 2024 and as President and Chief Operating Officer from April 2021 to July 2022. Mr. Lashier served as President and Chief Executive Officer of CPChem from August 2017 to April 2021. Kevin J. Mitchell is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since January 2016. Donald A. Baldridge is Executive Vice President, Midstream and Chemicals, a position he has held since June 2024. Previously, Mr. Baldridge served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of DCP Midstream from January 2023 to May 2024. Prior to that, he served as DCP Midstream’s President of Operations from January 2019 to December 2022. Zhanna Golodryga is Executive Vice President, Emerging Energy and Sustainability, a position she has held since October 2022. Previously, Ms. Golodryga served as Senior Vice President, Chief Digital and Administrative Officer from April 2017 to October 2022. Richard G. Harbison is Executive Vice President, Refining, a position he has held since June 2022. Mr. Harbison previously served as Vice President, San Francisco Refinery from March 2021 to May 2022; General Manager, San Francisco Refinery from June 2020 to February 2021; and Manager, Lake Charles Manufacturing Complex from February 2016 to May 2020. Brian M. Mandell is Executive Vice President, Marketing and Commercial, a position he has held since March 2019. Vanessa L. Allen Sutherland is Executive Vice President, Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, a position she has held since January 2022. Ms. Sutherland previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of Norfolk Southern Corporation from April 2020 to January 2022 and Senior Vice President, Government Relations and Chief Legal Officer of Norfolk Southern Corporation from August 2019 to April 2020. Ann M. Kluppel is Vice President and Controller, a position she has held since May 2024. Ms. Kluppel previously served as General Auditor from August 2021 to May 2024. Prior to that, Ms. Kluppel served as Managing Director, Corporate Finance from January 2021 to August 2021, and as Manager, Midstream Financial Planning & Analysis from August 2018 to December 2020. 45 PART II Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Phillips 66’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PSX.” At January 31, 2025, the number of shareholders of record of our shares was 27,494. Performance Graph The performance graph above shows the cumulative total shareholder return (TSR) of Phillips 66 common stock for the five years ended December 31, 2024, which assumes a $100 investment in our common stock on December 31, 2019, and reinvestment of dividends. The graph also compares our cumulative TSR against (i) our self-constructed Peer Group (defined below) and (ii) the S&P 500 Index, in each case upon the same assumptions for the same period. We evaluate our Peer Group on an annual basis and believe the Peer Group closely aligns with our size and lines of business. Our Peer Group is weighted according to the respective issuers’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The Peer Group consists of CVR Energy, Inc.; Delek US Holdings, Inc.; Dow Inc.; HF Sinclair Corporation; LyondellBasell Industries N.V.; Marathon Petroleum Corporation; ONEOK, Inc.; PBF Energy Inc.; Targa Resources Corp.; Valero Energy Corporation; Westlake Chemical Corporation; and The Williams Companies, Inc. Additionally, HollyFrontier Corporation was included as a peer for periods prior to its acquisition by HF Sinclair Corporation in March 2022. 46 Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Millions of Dollars Period Total Number of Shares Purchased* Average Price Paid per Share** Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs*** Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs October 1-31, 2024 2,660,930 $ 133.44 2,660,930 $ 3,750 November 1-30, 2024 945,973 130.28 945,973 3,627 December 1-31, 2024 1,089,842 120.96 1,089,842 3,495 Total 4,696,745 $ 129.90 4,696,745 * Includes repurchase of shares of common stock from company employees in connection with the company’s broad-based employee incentive plans, when applicable. ** Average price paid per share includes excise taxes. *** Since the inception of our share repurchase program in 2012, our Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate of $25 billion of repurchases of our outstanding common stock. Our share repurchase authorizations do not expire. Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on various factors including our share price, results of operations, financial condition and cash required for future business plans. Shares of stock repurchased are held as treasury shares. Item 6. [RESERVED] 47 Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Management’s Discussion and Analysis is the company’s analysis of its financial performance, financial condition, and significant trends that may affect future performance. It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The term “earnings” as used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis refers to net income attributable to Phillips 66. The terms “results,” “before- tax income” or “before-tax loss” as used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis refer to income (loss) before income taxes. EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW AND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Phillips 66 is uniquely positioned as a leading integrated downstream energy provider operating with Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialties (M&S), and Renewable Fuels segments. At December 31, 2024, we had total assets of $72.6 billion. Executive Overview During 2024, we reported earnings of $2.1 billion and generated $4.2 billion in cash from operating activities. We funded capital expenditures and investments of $1.9 billion, completed acquisitions for cash consideration of $625 million, purchased government obligations of $1.1 billion that were ultimately used to extinguish debt, and received proceeds from asset dispositions of $1.1 billion. Additionally, we received proceeds from debt issuances, net of debt repayments, of $2.1 billion. We paid $3.5 billion to repurchase common stock and $1.9 billion to fund dividends on our common stock. We ended 2024 with $1.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents and $4.6 billion of total committed capacity available under our credit facilities. Strategic Priorities In November 2022, we announced financial and operational targets toward achieving the company’s strategic priorities, and in October 2023, we announced updates and enhancements to certain of those targets. The strategic priority targets were focused on achieving financial and operational goals through year-end 2024, with an emphasis on delivering shareholder returns; improving refining performance; capturing value from wellhead-to-market; executing business transformation initiatives; maintaining financial strength and flexibility; and driving disciplined growth and returns. In January 2025, we announced the next phase of priorities along with financial and operational initiatives through year-end 2027. With these targets, the company is continuing to focus on creating shareholder value; driving disciplined growth and returns; and maintaining financial strength and flexibility. As the company has completed its business transformation efforts, the company has shifted to operational and cost reduction targets intended to drive world-class operations across its portfolio, while maintaining emphasis on growing its Midstream and Chemicals businesses. • Shareholder Returns – We believe shareholder value is enhanced through, among other things, a secure, competitive and growing dividend, complemented by share repurchases. With the return of $5.3 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends during 2024, we achieved our target of returning between $13 billion and $15 billion to our shareholders from July 2022 to year-end 2024, as we distributed a total of $13.6 billion to shareholders. Our new target aims to return greater than 50% of net cash provided by operating activities to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. The amount and timing of future dividend payments and the level and timing of future share repurchases is subject to the discretion of, and approval by, our Board of Directors and will depend on various factors including our share price, results of operations, financial condition and cash required for future business plans. 48 • World-Class Operations – We are focused on achieving operational excellence by optimizing utilization rates and product yield at our refineries through reliable and safe operations, which will enable us to capture the value available in the market in terms of prices and margins. With our new targets, we will remain focused on a competitive cost structure and plan to enhance Refining segment returns and increase our utilization rates by focusing on low-capital, higher-return projects that increase asset reliability and improve market capture. At year-end 2024, we achieved final total company run-rate cost savings of $1.5 billion through our business transformation efforts, including a $0.3 billion reduction of sustaining capital, exceeding our targeted savings on a run-rate basis. Our worldwide refining crude oil capacity utilization rate was 95% for 2024, and our worldwide refining clean product yield was 87%, compared to 92% and 85%, respectively, in 2023. Our new priorities for 2025-2027 continue to focus on Refining performance, targeting an annual clean product yield of greater than 86%, crude oil capacity utilization rates higher than industry average, and continuing to improve our competitive cost structure. • Disciplined Growth and Returns – A disciplined capital allocation process ensures we invest in projects that are expected to generate competitive returns. Our strategy remains focused on growing our Midstream and Chemicals businesses. Within our Midstream segment, we are primarily focused on maximizing the value of our fully integrated natural gas liquids (NGL) wellhead-to-market value chain. ▪ During 2024, we completed the conversion of our San Francisco Refinery in Rodeo, California, into the Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex (Rodeo Complex). ▪ In 2024, we funded capital expenditures and investments of $1.9 billion and completed acquisitions of $0.6 billion through disciplined capital allocation and $1.1 billion in proceeds from asset dispositions. In January 2025, we received proceeds from asset dispositions of $2.1 billion and we will continue to evaluate future opportunities to rationalize our asset portfolio. We have budgeted $2.1 billion for 2025 capital expenditures and investments, exclusive of acquisitions, which includes $1.1 billion of growth capital, primarily in our Midstream segment. ▪ During 2024, we expanded our Midstream NGL wellhead-to-market platform with the acquisition of Pinnacle Midland Parent LLC (Pinnacle Midstream) and approval of a follow-on processing plant expansion in the Midland Basin expected to be completed in mid- 2025. In addition, we achieved over $500 million of run-rate synergies from the integration of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, which is comprised of the businesses, activities, assets and liabilities of DCP Midstream, LP (DCP LP) and its subsidiaries and general partner entities, surpassing our target. ▪ Our new financial targets for 2025-2027 reflect our plans to grow Midstream and Chemicals businesses, as well as maintain total annual capital expenditures and investments of approximately $2 billion, excluding acquisitions. • Financial Strength and Flexibility – We use a variety of funding sources to support our liquidity requirements, including cash from operations, debt and proceeds from dispositions. Our focus remains on protecting the stable cash generation from the Midstream and Marketing and Specialties (M&S) businesses while balancing continued portfolio optimization. ▪ During 2024, we used available cash and proceeds from asset dispositions and debt offerings to fund capital expenditures and investments, complete the acquisition of Pinnacle Midstream, purchase government obligations that were ultimately used to extinguish debt, repurchase shares of our common stock and pay dividends on our common stock. ▪ We are targeting reductions of total debt to $17 billion and reductions of our debt to capital ratio. 49 Basis of Presentation Effective April 1, 2024, we changed the internal financial information reviewed by our chief executive officer to evaluate performance and allocate resources to our operating segments. This resulted in changes to the composition of our operating segments, as well as measurement changes for certain activities between our operating segments. The primary effects are summarized below. Prior period information has been recast for comparability. • Establishment of a Renewable Fuels operating segment, which includes renewable fuels activities and assets historically reported in our Refining, M&S and Midstream operating segments. • Change in method of allocating results for certain Gulf Coast distillate export activities from our M&S operating segment to our Refining operating segment. • Reclassification of certain crude oil and international clean products trading activities between our M&S operating segment and our Refining operating segment. • Change in reporting of our investment in NOVONIX Limited (NOVONIX) from our Midstream operating segment to Corporate and Other. In the third quarter of 2024, we began presenting the line item “Capital expenditures and investments” on our consolidated statement of cash flows exclusive of acquisitions, net of cash acquired. Prior period information has been reclassified for comparability. Starting on August 18, 2022, our Midstream operating segment and consolidated results reflect the impacts of the merger of DCP Midstream, LLC and Gray Oak Holdings LLC Merger (DCP Midstream Merger). See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 50 Business Environment The Midstream segment includes our Transportation and NGL businesses. Our Transportation business contains fee-based operations not directly exposed to commodity price risk. Our NGL business, including DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Sand Hills) and DCP Southern Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Southern Hills), contains both fee-based operations and operations directly impacted by NGL and natural gas prices. The weighted-average NGL price was $0.68 per gallon during 2024, compared with $0.67 per gallon during 2023. The Henry Hub natural gas price was $2.24 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) during 2024, compared with $2.53 per MMBtu during 2023. The increase in NGL prices was primarily due to higher demand and increased exports, while the decrease in natural gas prices was partially due to increased production and constraints on Permian natural gas exit capacity. The Chemicals segment consists of our 50% equity investment in Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem). The chemicals and plastics industry is mainly a commodity-based industry where the margins for key products are based on supply and demand, as well as cost factors. The benchmark high-density polyethylene chain margin was 17.7 cents per pound in 2024, compared with 16.4 cents per pound in 2023. The increase was mainly due to improved polyethylene sales prices and lower natural gas and ethane prices. Our Refining segment results are driven by several factors, including market crack spreads, refinery throughput, feedstock costs, product yields, turnaround activity, and other operating costs. Market crack spreads are used as indicators of refining margins and measure the difference between market prices for refined petroleum products and crude oil. The composite 3:2:1 market crack spread for our business decreased to an average of $16.95 per barrel during 2024, from an average of $28.37 per barrel in 2023. The decrease in the composite market crack spread was primarily driven by higher supply due to increased global refining utilization and lower global prices for gasoline and diesel. The price of U.S. benchmark crude oil, West Texas Intermediate at Cushing, Oklahoma, decreased to an average of $75.83 per barrel during 2024, from an average of $77.69 per barrel in 2023. The decrease in crude oil prices was primarily driven by increased production in the United States and other countries outside of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Results for our M&S segment depend largely on marketing fuel and lubricant margins and sales volumes of our refined products. While marketing fuel and lubricant margins are primarily driven by market factors, largely determined by the relationship between supply and demand, marketing fuel margins, in particular, are influenced by trends in spot prices, and where applicable, retail prices for refined products in the regions and countries where we operate. Our Renewable Fuels segment consists of the operations and assets of the Rodeo Complex, as well as the global activities to procure renewable feedstocks, manage certain regulatory credits, and market renewable fuels. Results for our Renewable Fuels segment are impacted by several factors, including the market price of renewable fuels, feedstock costs, throughput, operating costs, and the value of certain regulatory credits, as well as other market factors, largely determined by the relationship between supply and demand. 51 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Consolidated Results A summary of income (loss) before income taxes by operating segment with a reconciliation to net income attributable to Phillips 66 follows: Millions of Dollars Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Midstream $ 2,638 2,819 5,176 Chemicals 876 600 856 Refining (365) 5,340 7,976 Marketing and Specialties 1,011 1,897 2,072 Renewable Fuels (198) 153 171 Corporate and Other (1,287) (1,340) (1,612) Income before income taxes 2,675 9,469 14,639 Income tax expense 500 2,230 3,248 Net income 2,175 7,239 11,391 Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 58 224 367 Net income attributable to Phillips 66 $ 2,117 7,015 11,024 2024 vs. 2023 Net income attributable to Phillips 66 for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $2,117 million, compared with $7,015 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in 2024 was primarily due to a decline in realized refining margins primarily driven by lower market crack spreads, partially offset by lower income tax expense. 2023 vs. 2022 Net income attributable to Phillips 66 for the year ended December 31, 2023, was $7,015 million, compared with $11,024 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in 2023 was primarily due to the recognition of an aggregate before-tax gain of $3,013 million in 2022 in our Midstream segment in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger, and a decline in realized refining margins, partially offset by a decrease in income tax expense and lower unrealized investment losses related to our investment in NOVONIX. See the “Segment Results” section for additional information on our segment results and Note 24—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes. See also Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the DCP Midstream Merger. 52 Statement of Income Analysis 2024 vs. 2023 Sales and other operating revenues decreased 3%, primarily due to lower prices for refined petroleum products and crude oil, partially offset by an increase in prices for NGL. Purchased crude oil and products increased 1% in 2024, primarily due to higher refined product purchase volumes, partially offset by lower prices for refined petroleum products. Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased 12% in 2024, primarily due to lower equity earnings from WRB Refining LP (WRB) as a result of decreased margins, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC (REX) due to the sale of our ownership interest in 2024, South Texas Gateway Terminal due to the sale of our ownership interest in 2023, and Excel Paralubes LLC due to declining margins, partially offset by higher sales volumes and lower maintenance costs. These decreases were partially offset by higher equity earnings from CPChem. See the Chemicals segment analysis in the “Segment Results” section for additional information. Net gain on dispositions increased $206 million in 2024, primarily due to a before-tax gain of $238 million associated with the sale of our ownership interest in REX, as well as a before-tax gain of $67 million associated with the foreign currency forward contracts entered into in connection with the sale of our ownership interest in Coop Mineraloel AG (Coop). These increases were partially offset by before-tax gains totaling $137 million associated with the sales of our ownership interests in the South Texas Gateway Terminal and the Belle Chasse Terminal in 2023. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our sales of REX and Coop. Other income decreased 32% in 2024, primarily due to lower interest income as a result of lower cash balances and decreased results from trading activities. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in the fair value of our investment in NOVONIX. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11% in 2024, mainly driven by an accrual of $605 million recorded during the third quarter of 2024 related to litigation with Propel Fuels, Inc. (Propel Fuels). The increase was partially offset by lower employee-related expenses and selling expenses. See Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our litigation with Propel Fuels. Depreciation and amortization increased 20% in 2024, primarily due to $253 million of accelerated depreciation recorded in 2024 associated with our plan to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery during the fourth quarter of 2025, as well as depreciation and amortization associated with the startup of additional production capacity at the Rodeo Complex. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our plans to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery. Impairments increased $432 million in 2024, primarily due to before-tax impairments recorded in our Midstream segment of certain gathering and processing assets in Texas, an equity investment in a crude pipeline in Oklahoma and certain crude gathering assets in Texas. In 2024, we also recorded before-tax impairments in our Midstream and Refining segments related to certain crude oil processing and logistics assets in California. See Note 12— Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding impairments. Taxes other than income taxes decreased 53% in 2024, primarily due to an increase in tax credits generated from higher renewable diesel production and blending activity. Income tax expense decreased 78% in 2024, primarily due to lower income before income taxes. See Note 24—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our income taxes. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased 74% in 2024. The decrease primarily reflects the impacts of the acquisition of all publicly held common units of DCP LP in June 2023 (DCP LP Merger), as well as the impacts of before-tax impairments reported in our Midstream segment related to certain DCP LP gathering and processing assets in Texas. See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, and Note 12 —Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. 53 2023 vs. 2022 Sales and other operating revenues and purchased crude oil and products decreased 13% and 15%, respectively, in 2023. These decreases were mainly due to lower prices for refined petroleum products, crude oil and NGL. Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased 32% in 2023, resulting from lower equity earnings from DCP Midstream, DCP Sand Hills, DCP Southern Hills and Gray Oak Pipeline as a result of the DCP Midstream Merger in August 2022, as well as decreased equity earnings from WRB and CPChem primarily due to lower margins, partially offset by lower operating costs. See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Chemicals segment analysis in the “Segment Results” section for additional information. Net gain on dispositions increased $108 million in 2023, primarily due to a before-tax gain recognized in the Midstream segment in the third quarter of 2023 associated with the sale of our 25% ownership interest in the South Texas Gateway Terminal. Other income decreased $2,378 million in 2023, primarily due to an aggregate before-tax gain of $3,013 million recognized in our Midstream segment in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger in August 2022. The decrease was partially offset by lower unrealized investment losses on our investment in NOVONIX in 2023 compared with 2022, and higher interest income. See Note 5—Business Combinations, and Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the aggregate before-tax gain, and for additional information regarding our investment in NOVONIX. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 16% in 2023, mainly driven by the consolidation of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills starting in August 2022 and higher costs associated with our business transformation. These increases were partially offset by lower selling expenses due to decreased refined petroleum product prices. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding business transformation restructuring costs. Depreciation and amortization increased 21% in 2023, primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization related to assets acquired as a result of consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Southern Hills and DCP Sand Hills starting in August 2022. Taxes other than income taxes increased 33% in 2023, primarily due to consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills starting in August 2022 and an increase in environmental taxes. Interest and debt expense increased 45% in 2023, primarily driven by higher interest expense as a result of consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, new debt issuances in 2023 related to the DCP LP Merger, and a $53 million before-tax loss on the early redemption of DCP LP’s 5.850% junior subordinated notes. Income tax expense decreased 31% in 2023 primarily due to lower income before income taxes. See Note 24—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our income taxes. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests decreased 39% in 2023. The decrease reflects the impacts of the DCP LP Merger in June 2023, and the consolidation of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills and the derecognition of a noncontrolling interest related to Gray Oak Holdings as a result of the DCP Midstream Merger in August 2022. The decrease also reflects the impact of the merger between us and Phillips 66 Partners LP (Phillips 66 Partners), a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66, in March 2022. See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, and Note 30—Phillips 66 Partners LP, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the DCP Midstream Merger and the Phillips 66 Partners merger, respectively. 54 Segment Results Midstream Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Millions of Dollars Income Before Income Taxes Transportation $ 1,292 1,310 1,176 NGL 1,346 1,509 4,000 Total Midstream $ 2,638 2,819 5,176 Thousands of Barrels Daily Transportation Volumes Pipelines* 3,053 3,069 3,089 Terminals 3,123 3,246 2,981 Operating Statistics Wellhead Volume (billion cubic feet per day)** 4.3 4.6 4.4 NGL production** 436 437 423 Pipeline Throughput–Y-Grade to Market*** 754 707 704 NGL fractionated 728 711 529 * Pipelines represent the sum of volumes transported through each separately tariffed consolidated pipeline segment, excluding NGL’s pipelines. ** Includes 100% of DCP Midstream Class A Segment’s volumes from August 18, 2022, forward. *** Represents volumes delivered to major fractionation market hubs, including Mont Belvieu, Sweeny and Conway. Includes 100% of DCP Midstream Class A Segment and Phillips 66’s direct interest in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. The Midstream segment provides crude oil and refined petroleum product transportation, terminaling and processing services; NGL production, transportation, storage, fractionation, processing, marketing and export services; natural gas gathering, compressing, treating, processing, storage, transportation and marketing services; and condensate recovery. In connection with the DCP Midstream Merger, the results of our Transportation business reflect a decrease in our indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline to 6.5% from August 18, 2022, forward. Prior to August 18, 2022, the Transportation results presented in the table above reflect Gray Oak Holdings’ 65% economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline. In addition, the results of our NGL business include the consolidated results of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills from August 18, 2022, forward. Prior to August 18, 2022, our investments in DCP Midstream, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills were accounted for using the equity method and equity earnings from these investments were included in the results of our NGL business. In the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, see Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, for additional information regarding the DCP Midstream Merger. 55 2024 vs. 2023 Results from our Midstream segment decreased $181 million in 2024, compared with 2023. Results from our Transportation business decreased $18 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The decrease in 2024 was primarily due to before-tax impairments totaling $122 million, partially offset by an increase in before-tax gains on sales of assets. We sold our ownership interest in REX in 2024 and recorded a before-tax gain of $238 million, compared to before-tax gains recorded in 2023 associated with the sales of our ownership interests in the South Texas Gateway Terminal and the Belle Chasse Terminal which totaled $137 million. Results from our NGL business decreased $163 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The decrease was primarily due to before-tax impairment charges recognized in 2024 associated with certain gathering and processing assets in Texas, as well as unfavorable pricing driven by falling natural gas prices and winter weather impacts. These decreases were partially offset by improved pipeline volumes and higher liquefied petroleum gas cargo volumes and margins. See Note 12—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding impairments. See Note 9— Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the sale of our ownership interest in REX. See the “Executive Overview and Business Environment” section for information on market factors impacting 2024 results. 2023 vs. 2022 Results from our Midstream segment decreased $2,357 million in 2023, compared with 2022. Results from our Transportation business increased $134 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The increase in 2023 was primarily due to higher volumes and tariffs, as well as decreased operating costs, partially offset by lower before-tax gains on sales and transfers of interests in equity affiliates. In August 2023, we recognized a $101 million before-tax gain on the sale of our 25% ownership interest in the South Texas Gateway Terminal, while in August 2022, we recognized a before-tax gain of $182 million related to the transfer of an indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline as part of the DCP Midstream Merger. Results from our NGL business decreased $2,491 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The decrease was primarily due to an aggregate before-tax gain of $2,831 million recognized in the third quarter of 2022 from remeasuring our previously held equity investments in DCP Midstream, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills to their fair values in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger. The decrease was partially offset by the consolidation of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills from August 18, 2022, forward, as well as increased fractionation volumes at the Sweeny Hub reflecting the startup of Frac 4 in October 2022. See Note 5—Business Combinations, and Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the before-tax gains recorded in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger. 56 Chemicals Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Millions of Dollars Income Before Income Taxes $ 876 600 856 Millions of Pounds CPChem Externally Marketed Sales Volumes* 24,088 23,798 23,749 * Represents 100% of CPChem’s outside sales of produced petrochemical products, as well as commission sales from equity affiliates. Olefins and Polyolefins Capacity Utilization (percent) 97 % 96 91 The Chemicals segment consists of our 50% interest in CPChem, which we account for under the equity method. CPChem uses NGL and other feedstocks to produce petrochemicals. These products are then marketed and sold or used as feedstocks to produce plastics and other chemicals. CPChem produces and markets ethylene and other olefin products. Ethylene produced is primarily consumed within CPChem for the production of polyethylene, normal alpha olefins and polyethylene pipe. CPChem manufactures and/or markets aromatics and styrenics products, such as benzene, cyclohexane, styrene and polystyrene, as well as manufactures and/or markets a variety of specialty chemical products. Unless otherwise noted, amounts referenced below reflect our net 50% interest in CPChem. 2024 vs. 2023 Results from the Chemicals segment increased $276 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The increase was primarily due to improved margins driven by higher sales prices and lower feedstock costs, as well as increased volumes and decreased utility costs. See the “Executive Overview and Business Environment” section for information on market factors impacting CPChem’s 2024 results. 2023 vs. 2022 Results from the Chemicals segment decreased $256 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower margins driven by decreased sales prices, partially offset by lower utility costs due to a decline in natural gas prices. 57 Refining Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Millions of Dollars Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Atlantic Basin/Europe $ (59) 816 2,402 Gulf Coast (68) 1,744 2,252 Central Corridor 670 2,241 2,431 West Coast (908) 539 891 Worldwide $ (365) 5,340 7,976 Dollars Per Barrel Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Atlantic Basin/Europe $ (0.30) 4.48 12.05 Gulf Coast (0.35) 8.44 11.08 Central Corridor 6.18 21.81 24.81 West Coast (10.38) 4.63 7.94 Worldwide (0.62) 8.78 13.02 Realized Refining Margins* Atlantic Basin/Europe $ 7.42 12.80 20.17 Gulf Coast 7.68 15.67 19.05 Central Corridor 11.52 22.50 25.02 West Coast 8.50 18.95 24.43 Worldwide 8.84 17.26 21.77 * See the “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” section for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable measure under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), income (loss) before income taxes per barrel. In October 2024, we announced our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025, and are evaluating potential future uses of the property. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. In early 2024, we ceased crude operations at the San Francisco Refinery as part of the conversion of the refinery into the Rodeo Complex. 58 Thousands of Barrels Daily Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Operating Statistics Refining operations* Atlantic Basin/Europe Crude oil capacity 537 537 537 Crude oil processed 502 479 524 Capacity utilization (percent) 93 % 89 98 Refinery production 540 502 549 Gulf Coast Crude oil capacity 529 529 529 Crude oil processed 483 511 488 Capacity utilization (percent) 91 % 97 92 Refinery production 542 574 565 Central Corridor Crude oil capacity 531 531 531 Crude oil processed 529 477 469 Capacity utilization (percent) 100 % 90 88 Refinery production 551 497 487 West Coast** Crude oil capacity 244 313 364 Crude oil processed 229 299 290 Capacity utilization (percent) 94 % 95 80 Refinery production 238 319 307 Worldwide Crude oil capacity 1,841 1,910 1,961 Crude oil processed 1,743 1,766 1,771 Capacity utilization (percent) 95 % 92 90 Refinery production 1,871 1,892 1,908 * Includes our share of equity affiliates. ** As part of our plans to convert the San Francisco Refinery into a renewable fuels facility, in the first quarter of 2023, we ceased operations at the Santa Maria facility in Arroyo Grande, California, which reduced net crude throughput capacity from 120 MB/D to 75 MB/D. In October 2023, we further reduced net crude throughput capacity from 75 MB/D to 52 MB/D as we shut down one of the two crude units at the Rodeo facility. The Rodeo facility’s net crude throughput capacity of 52 MB/D prior to shutdown was excluded from the 2024 operating statistics above. The Refining segment refines crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, such as gasoline and distillates, including aviation fuels, at 11 refineries in the United States and Europe. 2024 vs. 2023 Results from the Refining segment decreased $5,705 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower realized margins as a result of declining market crack spreads. Our worldwide refining crude oil capacity utilization rate was 95% and 92% in 2024 and 2023, respectively. See the “Executive Overview and Business Environment” section for information on industry crack spreads and other market factors impacting this year’s results. 59 2023 vs. 2022 Results from the Refining segment decreased $2,636 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower realized margins, partially offset by lower utility costs. The decrease in realized margins was primarily driven by a decline in market crack spreads, partially offset by increased feedstock advantage and improved crude optimization benefits. Our worldwide refining crude oil capacity utilization rate was 92% and 90% in 2023 and 2022, respectively. 60 Marketing and Specialties Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Millions of Dollars Income Before Income Taxes $ 1,011 1,897 2,072 Dollars Per Barrel Income Before Income Taxes U.S. $ 0.41 1.65 1.73 International 3.93 4.72 5.66 Realized Marketing Fuel Margins* U.S. $ 1.73 2.12 2.12 International 5.15 5.96 7.03 * See the “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” section for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, income before income taxes per barrel. Dollars Per Gallon U.S. Average Wholesale Prices* Gasoline $ 2.64 2.93 3.30 Distillates 2.69 3.23 3.86 * On third-party branded refined product sales, excluding excise taxes. Thousands of Barrels Daily Marketing Refined Product Sales Gasoline 1,278 1,240 1,183 Distillates 1,010 957 967 Other 52 27 29 2,340 2,224 2,179 The M&S segment purchases for resale and markets refined products, mainly in the United States and Europe. In addition, this segment includes the manufacturing and marketing of base oils and lubricants. 2024 vs. 2023 Before-tax income from the M&S segment decreased $886 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The decrease in 2024 was primarily driven by an accrual of $605 million recorded during the third quarter of 2024 related to litigation with Propel Fuels, as well as lower U.S. marketing fuel margins. See the “Executive Overview and Business Environment” section for information on marketing fuel margins and other market factors impacting 2024 results. See Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our litigation with Propel Fuels. 2023 vs. 2022 Before-tax income from the M&S segment decreased $175 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The decrease in 2023 was primarily driven by lower international realized marketing fuel margins and decreased equity earnings from affiliates. 61 Renewable Fuels Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Millions of Dollars Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes $ (198) 153 171 Thousands of Barrels Daily Operating Statistics Total Renewable Fuels Produced 31 10 8 Total Renewable Fuel Sales 52 28 23 Market Indicators Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) soybean oil (dollars per pound) $ 0.44 0.58 0.71 California Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) carbon credit (dollars per metric ton) 60.48 72.76 98.73 California Air Resource Board (CARB) ultra-low-sulfur diesel (ULSD) - San Francisco (dollars per gallon) 2.48 2.87 3.56 Biodiesel Renewable Identification Number (RIN) (dollars per RIN) 0.59 1.35 1.67 The Renewable Fuels segment processes renewable feedstocks into renewable products at the Rodeo Complex and at our Humber Refinery. In addition, this segment includes the global activities to procure renewable feedstocks, manage certain regulatory credits, and market renewable fuels. 2024 vs. 2023 Results from the Renewable Fuels segment decreased $351 million in 2024, compared with 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by higher costs related to the ramp-up of the Rodeo Complex. 2023 vs. 2022 Results from the Renewable Fuels segment decreased $18 million in 2023, compared with 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by higher costs related to the ramp-up of the Rodeo Complex, as well as lower results from renewable transport fuel certificate activity due to lower blending margins. These decreases were partially offset by higher credit generation and increased renewable fuel sales. See the “Executive Overview and Business Environment” section for information on market factors impacting this quarter’s results. 62 Corporate and Other Millions of Dollars Year Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Loss Before Income Taxes Net interest expense $ (745) (629) (537) Corporate overhead and other (539) (672) (633) NOVONIX (3) (39) (442) Total Corporate and Other $ (1,287) (1,340) (1,612) Net interest expense consists of interest and financing expense, net of interest income and capitalized interest. Corporate overhead and other includes general and administrative expenses, technology costs, environmental costs associated with sites no longer in operation, restructuring costs related to our business transformation, foreign currency transaction gains and losses, and other costs not directly associated with an operating segment. Corporate and Other also includes the change in the fair value of our investment in NOVONIX. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our investment in NOVONIX. 2024 vs. 2023 Net interest expense increased $116 million in 2024, compared with 2023, primarily driven by decreased interest income as a result of lower cash balances. Corporate overhead and other decreased $133 million in 2024, compared with 2023, primarily due to a decrease in consulting fees associated with our business transformation, as well as lower employee-related expenses. The fair value of our investment in NOVONIX declined by $3 million during 2024, compared with a decline of $39 million during 2023. 2023 vs. 2022 Net interest expense increased $92 million in 2023, compared with 2022, primarily driven by higher interest expense as a result of consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, new debt issuances in 2023 related to the DCP LP Merger and a $53 million before-tax loss on the early redemption of DCP LP’s 5.850% junior subordinated notes. The increase in interest expense in 2023 was partially offset by increased interest income. See Note 15— Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding debt. Corporate overhead and other increased $39 million in 2023, compared with 2022, primarily due to higher costs related to our business transformation. See Note 4—Restructuring, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding restructuring costs. The fair value of our investment in NOVONIX declined by $39 million during 2023, compared with a decline of $442 million during 2022. 63 CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY Financial Indicators Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated 2024 2023 2022 Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,738 3,323 6,133 Net cash provided by operating activities 4,191 7,029 10,813 Short-term debt 1,831 1,482 529 Total debt 20,062 19,359 17,190 Total equity 28,463 31,650 34,106 Percent of total debt to capital* 41 % 38 34 Percent of floating-rate debt to total debt 9 % 10 — * Capital includes total debt and total equity. To meet our short- and long-term liquidity requirements, we use a variety of funding sources, but rely primarily on cash generated from operating activities and debt financing. During 2024, we generated $4.2 billion in cash from operations. We funded capital expenditures and investments of $1.9 billion, completed acquisitions for cash consideration of $625 million, purchased government obligations of $1.1 billion that were ultimately used to extinguish debt, and received proceeds from asset dispositions of $1.1 billion. Additionally, we received proceeds from debt issuances, net of debt repayments, of $2.1 billion. We paid $3.5 billion to repurchase common stock and $1.9 billion to fund dividends on our common stock. During 2024, cash and cash equivalents decreased $1.6 billion to $1.7 billion. At this time, we believe that our cash on hand, as well as the sources of liquidity described herein, will be sufficient to fund our obligations over the short- and long-term. Significant Sources of Capital Operating Activities During 2024, cash generated by operating activities was $4.2 billion, a $2.8 billion decrease compared with 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower earnings, driven by a decline in realized refining margins, partially offset by more favorable working capital impacts. During 2023, cash generated by operating activities was $7.0 billion, a $3.8 billion decrease compared with 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower realized refining margins, working capital impacts, reduced operating distributions from equity affiliates, completion of long-term crude oil exchanges and higher contributions to our pension plans. Our short- and long-term operating cash flows are highly dependent upon refining and marketing margins, NGL prices and chemicals margins. Prices and margins in our industry are typically volatile, and are driven by market conditions over which we have little or no control. Absent other mitigating factors, as these prices and margins fluctuate, we would expect a corresponding change in our operating cash flows. The level and quality of output from our refineries also impacts our cash flows. Factors such as operating efficiency, maintenance turnarounds, market conditions, feedstock availability, and weather conditions can affect output. We actively manage the operations of our refineries, and any variability in their operations typically has not been as significant to cash flows as that caused by fluctuations in margins and prices. Our worldwide refining crude oil capacity utilization was 95%, 92% and 90% in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our worldwide refining clean product yield was 87%, 85% and 84% in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 64 Equity Affiliate Operating Distributions Our operating cash flows are also impacted by distribution decisions made by our equity affiliates. Over the three years ended December 31, 2024, operating cash flows included aggregate distributions from our equity affiliates of $4.2 billion. We cannot control the amount of future dividends from equity affiliates; therefore, future dividend payments by these equity affiliates are not assured. Debt Issuances On September 9, 2024, Phillips 66 Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66, issued $1.8 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2031 (Additional 2031 Notes). • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 4.950% Senior Notes due 2035 (2035 Notes). • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.500% Senior Notes due 2055 (2055 Notes). Interest on the Additional 2031 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year and commenced on December 15, 2024. Interest on the 2035 Notes and 2055 Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15, commencing on March 15, 2025. On February 28, 2024, Phillips 66 Company issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2031 (2031 Notes). • $400 million aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2033 (Additional 2033 Notes). • $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.650% Senior Notes due 2054 (2054 Notes). Interest on the 2031 Notes and 2054 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year and commenced on June 15, 2024. Interest on the Additional 2033 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 30 of each year and commenced on June 30, 2024. On March 29, 2023, Phillips 66 Company issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $750 million aggregate principal amount of 4.950% Senior Notes due December 2027. • $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due June 2033. Discharge of Senior Notes On September 20, 2024, we extinguished (i) the remaining $441 million outstanding principal amount of Phillips 66 Company’s 3.605% senior notes due February 2025 (2025 P66 Co Notes), and (ii) the remaining $650 million outstanding principal amount of Phillips 66’s 3.850% senior notes due April 2025 (the 2025 PSX Notes, and together with the 2025 P66 Co Notes, the Discharged Notes), whereby we irrevocably transferred a total of $1,100 million in government obligations to the trustee of the 2025 P66 Co Notes and the 2025 PSX Notes. The cash paid to purchase the government obligations is included within investing cash flows on our consolidated statement of cash flows. These government obligations will yield sufficient principal and interest over their remaining term to permit the trustee to satisfy the remaining principal and interest due on the Discharged Notes. Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company are no longer the primary obligors under the Discharged Notes. The transfer of the government obligations to the trustee was accounted for as a transfer of financial assets. If the trustee is unable to apply the government obligations to fund the remaining principal and interest payments on the Discharged Notes, then the Company’s obligations under the Indenture with respect to the Discharged Notes will be revived and reinstated. We deem the likelihood of such event to be remote with no impact to the legal isolation of the assets. Accordingly, the senior notes and the government obligations were derecognized on our balance sheet at December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized an immaterial gain on the extinguishment of this debt. 65 Term Loan Agreement On March 27, 2023, Phillips 66 Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66, entered into a $1.5 billion delayed draw term loan agreement guaranteed by Phillips 66 (the Term Loan Agreement). The Term Loan Agreement provides for a single borrowing during a 90-day period commencing on the closing date, which borrowing was contingent upon the completion of the DCP LP Merger. The Term Loan Agreement contains customary covenants similar to those contained in our revolving credit agreement, including a maximum consolidated net debt-to-capitalization ratio of 65% as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Term Loan Agreement has customary events of default, such as nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts after grace periods; and violation of covenants. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement bear interest at either: (a) the adjusted term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in effect from time to time plus the applicable margin; or (b) the reference rate plus the applicable margin, as defined in the Term Loan Agreement. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, $550 million and $1.25 billion were borrowed under the Term Loan Agreement, which matures in June 2026, respectively. Related Party Advance Term Loan Agreements At December 31, 2023, borrowings outstanding under our Advance Term Loan agreements with WRB totaled $290 million. Borrowings under these agreements were due between 2035 and 2038 and bore interest at a floating rate based on an adjusted term SOFR plus an applicable margin, payable on the last day of each month. On December 31, 2024, WRB distributed its Advance Term Loan with a principal balance of $290 million, including the right to receive any accrued but unpaid interest, to Phillips 66 Company, resulting in the reduction of our related party debt balance and our investment in WRB by $290 million. The distribution was recognized as a non-cash investing and financing transaction. Accounts Receivable Securitization On September 30, 2024, Phillips 66 Company entered into a 364-day, $500 million accounts receivable securitization facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility). Under the Receivables Securitization Facility, Phillips 66 Company sells or contributes on an ongoing basis, certain of its receivables, together with related security and interests in the proceeds thereof, to its wholly owned subsidiary, Phillips 66 Receivables LLC (P66 Receivables), a consolidated and bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity created for the sole purpose of transacting under the Receivables Securitization Facility. Under the Receivables Securitization Facility, P66 Receivables may borrow and incur indebtedness from, and/or sell certain receivables in an amount not to exceed $500 million in the aggregate, and will secure its obligations with a pledge of undivided interests in such receivables, together with related security and interests in the proceeds thereof, to PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the secured parties thereunder. Accounts outstanding under the Receivables Securitization Facility accrue interest at an adjusted SOFR plus the applicable margin. In all instances, Phillips 66 Company retains the servicing of the accounts receivables transferred. P66 Receivables’ sole activity consists of purchasing receivables from Phillips 66 Company, providing those receivables as collateral for P66 Receivables’ borrowings or on-selling certain of its receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility. P66 Receivables is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors, who will be entitled, upon its liquidation, to be satisfied out of P66 Receivables’ assets prior to assets or value in P66 Receivables becoming available to P66 Receivables’ equity holders. The assets of P66 Receivables, including any funds of P66 Receivables that may be commingled with funds of any of its affiliates for purposes of cash management and related efficiencies, are not available to pay creditors of Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 or any affiliate thereof. Collections on receivables in excess of amounts owed by P66 Receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility are available to P66 Receivables for payment to Phillips 66 Company, for sales of its receivables to P66 Receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility, and otherwise for distribution to Phillips 66 Company, in each case, subject to the terms set forth in the Receivables Securitization Facility. The amount available for borrowing or sale of receivables may be limited by the availability of eligible receivables and other customary factors and conditions, as well as the covenants set forth in the Receivables Securitization Facility. 66 Sales of accounts receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility meet the sale criteria under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, and are derecognized from the consolidated balance sheet. P66 Receivables guarantees payment, in full, for accounts receivables sold to the purchasers. Cash receipts from the sale of accounts receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility, received at the time of sale, are classified as cash flows from operating activities. For the year-ended December 31, 2024, we sold $125 million of accounts receivables in exchange for a $125 million reduction in our borrowings under the Receivables Securitization Facility, which was recognized as a non-cash financing transaction. We recognized an immaterial charge associated with the transfer of financial assets, which is included as a component within the line item “Selling, general and administrative expense” on our consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, $121 million of the sold accounts receivable remained outstanding, which represents our maximum potential future exposure under the guarantee. Borrowings under the Receivables Securitization Facility are recognized as short-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. Borrowings are secured by the accounts receivables, held by P66 Receivables, which remain reported as accounts receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2024, we had outstanding borrowings of $375 million under the Receivables Securitization Facility, secured by approximately $4.6 billion of accounts receivable held by P66 Receivables. At December 31, 2024, we had no unused capacity under the Receivables Securitization Facility. Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company On January 13, 2025, we entered into a $200 million uncommitted credit facility (the 2025 Uncommitted Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor. The 2025 Uncommitted Facility contains covenants and events of default customary for unsecured uncommitted facilities. The 2025 Uncommitted Facility has no commitment fees or compensating balance requirements. Outstanding borrowings under the 2025 Uncommitted Facility bear interest at a rate of either (a) the adjusted term SOFR plus the applicable margin, (b) the adjusted daily simple SOFR plus the applicable margin or (c) the base rate, in each case plus the applicable margin. Each borrowing matures six months from the date of such borrowing. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. At February 21, 2025, no amount had been drawn under the 2025 Uncommitted Facility. On June 25, 2024, we entered into a $400 million uncommitted credit facility (the 2024 Uncommitted Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor. The 2024 Uncommitted Facility contains covenants and events of default customary for unsecured uncommitted facilities. The 2024 Uncommitted Facility has no commitment fees or compensating balance requirements. Outstanding borrowings under the 2024 Uncommitted Facility bear interest at a rate of either (a) the adjusted term SOFR, (b) the adjusted daily simple SOFR or (c) the reference rate, in each case plus the applicable margin. Each borrowing matures six months from the date of such borrowing. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. At December 31, 2024, the entire $400 million had been drawn under the 2024 Uncommitted Facility. 67 On February 28, 2024, we entered into a new $5 billion revolving credit agreement (the Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor and a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2029. The Facility replaced our previous $5 billion revolving credit facility dated as of June 23, 2022, with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor, and the previous revolving credit facility was terminated. The Facility contains customary covenants similar to the previous revolving credit facility, including a maximum consolidated net debt-to-capitalization ratio of 65% as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Facility has customary events of default, such as nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts after grace periods; and violation of covenants. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings under the Facility, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. We have the option to increase the overall capacity to $6 billion, subject to certain conditions. We also have the option to extend the scheduled maturity of the Facility for up to two additional one-year terms, subject to, among other things, the consent of the lenders holding the majority of the commitments and of each lender extending its commitment. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility bear interest at either: (a) the adjusted term SOFR (as described in the Facility) in effect from time to time plus the applicable margin; or (b) the reference rate (as described in the Facility) plus the applicable margin. The pricing levels for the commitment fee and interest-rate margins are determined based on the ratings in effect for our senior unsecured long-term debt from time to time. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, no amounts were drawn under the Facility or the previous revolving credit facility, respectively. Phillips 66 also has a $5 billion uncommitted commercial paper program for short-term working capital needs that is supported by the Facility. Commercial paper maturities are contractually limited to less than one year. At December 31, 2024, $435 million of commercial paper had been issued under this program. At December 31, 2023, no borrowings were outstanding under this program. DCP Midstream Class A Segment On March 15, 2024, DCP LP terminated its $1.4 billion credit facility and its accounts receivable securitization facility that previously provided for up to $350 million of borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2023, DCP LP had $25 million in borrowings outstanding under its $1.4 billion credit facility and $350 million of borrowings outstanding under its accounts receivable securitization facility, both of which were repaid during the three months ended March 31, 2024. Total Committed Capacity Available At December 31, 2024, and 2023, we had $4.6 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively, of total committed capacity available under the credit facilities described above. Asset & Investment Dispositions On December 10, 2024, we sold our equity interests in certain pipeline and terminaling assets in North Dakota for cash proceeds of approximately $143 million. On August 30, 2024, we sold certain Midstream gathering and processing assets in Texas for cash proceeds of $41 million. On August 1, 2024, we sold our ownership interests in certain gathering and processing assets in Louisiana and Alabama for cash proceeds of $173 million. On June 14, 2024, we sold our 25% ownership interest in REX for cash proceeds of $685 million. On August 1, 2023, we sold our 25% ownership interest in the South Texas Gateway Terminal for approximately $275 million. On February 28, 2023, we sold the Belle Chasse Terminal for approximately $76 million. 68 Subsequent Investment Dispositions On January 30, 2025, we sold our 25% ownership interest in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC for cash proceeds of $853 million. On January 31, 2025, we sold our 49% ownership interest in Coop. We received cash proceeds of 1.06 billion Swiss francs, consisting of a sales price of approximately 977 million Swiss francs and a final dividend relating to financial year 2024 of 83 million Swiss francs from Coop that was paid on January 30, 2025. We also settled the foreign currency forward contracts entered into in connection with the asset sale, in which we sold 1.06 billion Swiss francs in exchange for $1.24 billion U.S. dollars. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables and Note 10—Properties, Plants and Equipment, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding asset and investment dispositions. Phillips 66 Availability of Debt Financing We have an A3 credit rating, with a stable outlook, from Moody’s Investors Service and a BBB+ credit rating, with a stable outlook, from Standard & Poor’s. These investment grade ratings have served to lower our borrowing costs and facilitate access to a variety of lenders. We do not have any ratings triggers on any of our corporate debt that would cause an automatic default, and thereby impact our access to liquidity, in the event of a rating downgrade by one or both rating agencies. Failure to maintain investment grade ratings could prohibit us from accessing the commercial paper market, although we would expect to be able to access funds under our liquidity facilities mentioned above. DCP LP Availability of Debt Financing DCP LP has a Baa3 credit rating, with a positive outlook, from Moody’s Investors Service and a BBB+ credit rating, with a stable outlook, from Standard and Poor’s. These ratings facilitate DCP LP’s access to a variety of lenders. DCP LP does not have any ratings triggers on any of its corporate debt that would cause an automatic default, and thereby impact access to liquidity, in the event of a rating downgrade by one or more rating agencies. 69 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Lease Residual Value Guarantees Under the operating lease agreement for our headquarters facility in Houston, Texas, we have the option, at the end of the lease term in September 2025, to request to renew the lease, purchase the facility or assist the lessor in marketing it for resale. We have a residual value guarantee associated with the operating lease agreement with a maximum potential future exposure of $514 million at December 31, 2024. We also have residual value guarantees associated with railcar, airplane and truck leases with maximum potential future exposures totaling $175 million. These leases have remaining terms of one to ten years. Dakota Access, LLC (Dakota Access) and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Company, LLC (ETCO) In 2020, the trial court presiding over litigation brought by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (the Tribe) ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addressing an easement under Lake Oahe in North Dakota. The trial court later vacated the easement. Although the easement is vacated, the USACE has no plans to stop pipeline operations while it proceeds with the EIS, and the Tribe’s request for a shutdown was denied in May 2021. In June 2021, the trial court dismissed the litigation entirely. Once the EIS is completed, new litigation or challenges may be filed. In February 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court) denied Dakota Access’ writ of certiorari requesting the Supreme Court to review the trial court’s decision to order the EIS and vacate the easement. Therefore, the requirement to prepare the EIS stood. Also in February 2022, the Tribe withdrew as a cooperating agency, causing the USACE to halt the EIS process while the USACE engaged with the Tribe on their reasons for withdrawing. The draft EIS process resumed in August 2022, and in September 2023, the USACE published its draft EIS for public comment. The USACE identified five potential outcomes but did not indicate which one it preferred. The options comprise two “no action” alternatives where the USACE would deny an easement to Dakota Access and require it to shut down the pipeline and either remove the pipe from under Lake Oahe or allow the pipeline to be abandoned-in-place under the lake. The USACE also identified three “action” alternatives; two of them contemplate that the USACE would reissue the easement to Dakota Access under essentially the same terms as 2017 with either the same or a larger volume of oil allowed through the pipeline, while the third alternative would require decommissioning of the current pipeline and construction of a new line 39 miles upstream from the current location. The public comment period concluded on December 13, 2023. The USACE plans to review the comments and issue its final EIS in early 2026. The Record of Decision will follow within 30 to 60 days after the issuance of the final EIS. The final EIS must be completed before the USACE can reauthorize the easement for the pipeline. If reauthorization occurs, new litigation challenging the reauthorization may be filed. In October 2024, the Tribe filed another lawsuit against the USACE in federal district court in Washington, D.C., again challenging USACE’s allowance of pipeline operations while the EIS process proceeds. In this lawsuit, the Tribe purports to introduce new evidence regarding the pipeline’s proximity to a reservoir and attempts to relitigate arguments about the need for injunctive relief to support its position that the Supreme Court should halt pipeline operations. A consortium of 13 states has joined Dakota Access as intervenors. The consortium argues that the pipeline reduces pollution compared to other modes of transportation and that Dakota Access is integral to the health of regional energy and agriculture markets. The Tribe’s prior request for a shutdown was denied in May 2021. This latest lawsuit seeking a shutdown does not change the current deadline for the issuance of the final EIS. Dakota Access and ETCO have guaranteed repayment of senior unsecured notes issued by a wholly owned subsidiary of Dakota Access. On April 1, 2024, Dakota Access’ wholly owned subsidiary repaid $1 billion aggregate principal amount of its outstanding senior notes upon maturity. We funded our 25% share of the repayment, or $250 million, with a capital contribution of $171 million in March 2024 and $79 million of distributions we elected not to receive from Dakota Access in the first quarter of 2024. At December 31, 2024, the aggregate principal amount outstanding of Dakota Access’ senior unsecured notes was $850 million. 70 In addition, Phillips 66 Partners and its co-venturers in Dakota Access also provided a Contingent Equity Contribution Undertaking (CECU) in conjunction with the notes offering. Under the CECU, the co-venturers may be severally required to make proportionate equity contributions to Dakota Access if there is an unfavorable final judgment in the above-mentioned ongoing litigation. At December 31, 2024, our 25% share of the maximum potential equity contributions under the CECU was approximately $215 million. If the pipeline is required to cease operations, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. Should operations cease and Dakota Access and ETCO not have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, we also could be required to support our 25% share of the ongoing expenses, including scheduled interest payments on the notes of approximately $10 million annually, in addition to the potential obligations under the CECU at December 31, 2024. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial statements for additional information regarding our investments in Dakota Access and ETCO. See Note 16—Guarantees, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding guarantees. 71 Capital Requirements Capital Expenditures and Investments For information about our capital expenditures and investments, see the “Capital Spending” section below. Debt Financing Our debt balance at December 31, 2024, was $20.1 billion and our total debt-to-capital ratio was 41%. See Note 15—Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for our annual debt maturities over the next five years and more information on debt repayments. Repayments On December 16, 2024, upon maturity, Phillips 66 Company and Phillips 66 Partners repaid the 2.450% Senior Notes due December 2024 with an aggregate principal amount of $300 million. On March 29, 2024, DCP LP redeemed $300 million of its 5.375% Senior Notes due July 2025. After the redemption, an aggregate principal amount of $525 million remained outstanding. On March 4, 2024, Phillips 66 Company repaid $700 million of the $1.25 billion borrowed under its delayed draw term loan that matures in June 2026. On February 15, 2024, upon maturity, Phillips 66 repaid its 0.900% senior notes due February 2024 with an aggregate principal amount of $800 million. DCP LP Cash Distributions to Unitholders DCP LP’s partnership agreement requires it to distribute all available cash within 45 days after the end of each quarter. For the year ended December 31, 2024, DCP LP made cash distributions of $47 million to common unitholders other than Phillips 66 and its subsidiaries. See Note 3— DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the DCP LP public common unit acquisition. Acquisitions On October 1, 2024, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast in our M&S segment for total consideration of $65 million. These operations were acquired to support the placement of renewable diesel produced by the Rodeo Complex. On July 1, 2024, we acquired Pinnacle Midstream in our Midstream segment to expand our natural gas gathering and processing operations in the Permian Basin for cash consideration of $565 million. Midstream Pending Acquisition On January 6, 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all issued and outstanding equity interests in each of EPIC Y-Grade GP, LLC (Y- Grade GP) and EPIC Y-Grade, LP (Y-Grade LP, and, together with Y-Grade GP and their respective subsidiaries, EPIC Y-Grade), which own various long haul natural gas liquids pipelines, fractionation facilities and distribution systems, for cash consideration of $2.2 billion, subject to certain closing adjustments. The closing date of this transaction is dependent on regulatory approval and completion of other customary closing conditions. Dividends On February 12, 2025, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $1.15 per common share. The dividend is payable March 5, 2025, to holders of record at the close of business on February 24, 2025. Share Repurchases Since July 2012, our Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate of $25 billion of repurchases of our outstanding common stock, and we have repurchased 238 million shares at an aggregate cost of $21.5 billion. In 2024, we repurchased 24.2 million shares at an aggregate cost of $3.4 billion. Our share repurchase authorizations do not expire. Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on various factors including our share price, results of operations, financial condition and cash required for future business plans. Shares of stock repurchased are held as treasury shares. 72 Contractual Obligations Our contractual obligations primarily consist of purchase obligations, outstanding debt principal and interest obligations, operating and finance lease obligations, and asset retirement and environmental obligations. Purchase Obligations Our purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, legally binding and specify all significant terms. We expect these purchase obligations will be fulfilled with operating cash flows in the period when due. At December 31, 2024, our purchase obligations totaled $85.3 billion, with $31.2 billion due within one year. The majority of our purchase obligations are market-based contracts, including exchanges and futures, for the purchase of commodities such as crude oil and NGL. The commodities are used to supply our refineries and fractionators and optimize our supply chain. At December 31, 2024, commodity purchase commitments with third parties and related parties were $47.4 billion and $24.9 billion, respectively. The remaining purchase obligations mainly represent agreements to access and utilize the capacity of third-party equipment and facilities, including pipelines and product terminals, to transport, process, treat, and store products, and our net share of purchase commitments for materials and services for jointly owned facilities where we are the operator. Debt Principal and Interest Obligations As of December 31, 2024, our aggregate principal amount of outstanding debt was $20.2 billion, with $1.8 billion due within one year. Our obligations for interest on the debt totaled $10.6 billion, with $925 million due within one year. See Note 15—Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our outstanding debt principal and interest obligations. Finance and Operating Lease Obligations See Note 21—Leases, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our lease obligations and timing of our expected lease payments. Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations See Note 13—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding asset retirement and environmental obligations. 73 Capital Spending Our capital expenditures and investments represent consolidated capital spending. Millions of Dollars 2025 Budget 2024 2023 2022 Capital Expenditures and Investments* Midstream** $ 975 751 625 737 Chemicals — — — — Refining 822 582 586 607 Marketing and Specialties 154 85 101 87 Renewable Fuels 74 375 753 323 Corporate and Other 75 66 90 134 Total Capital Expenditures and Investments $ 2,100 1,859 2,155 1,888 Selected Equity Affiliates*** CPChem $ 714 809 1,009 701 WRB 171 121 189 177 Total Selected Equity Affiliates $ 885 930 1,198 878 * In the third quarter of 2024, we began presenting the line item “Capital expenditures and investments” on our consolidated statement of cash flows exclusive of acquisitions, net of cash acquired. Prior period information has been reclassified for comparability. Acquisitions, net of cash acquired, were $625 million, $263 million and $306 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. ** Includes 100% of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills capital expenditures and investments from August 18, 2022, forward. *** Our share of joint ventures’ capital spending. Midstream Capital spending in our Midstream segment was $2.1 billion for the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, including: • Expansion of gathering and processing systems in the Denver-Julesburg Basin and the Permian Basin. • Contributions to Dakota Access for a pipeline optimization project, including a contribution to fund our 25% share of Dakota Access’ debt repayment. • Continued development and expansion of fractionation capacity at our Sweeny Hub. • Spending associated with other return, reliability, and maintenance projects in our Transportation and NGL businesses. Chemicals During the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, CPChem had a self-funded capital program that totaled $5 billion on a 100% basis. Capital spending was primarily for the development of petrochemical projects on the U.S. Gulf Coast and in the Middle East, as well as sustaining, debottlenecking and optimization projects on existing assets. 74 Refining Capital spending for the Refining segment during the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, was $1.8 billion, primarily for projects to enhance the yield of higher-value products and sustain the reliability and safety of our refineries. Key projects funded during the three-year period included: • Installation of facilities to improve market capture at our refineries. • Installation of facilities to improve utilization and product value at our refineries. • Capital spending to improve reliability at our refineries. Marketing and Specialties Capital spending for the M&S segment during the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, was $273 million, primarily for the continued development and enhancement of retail sites in Europe, spend associated with marketing and commercial fleet fueling businesses on the U.S. West Coast, marketing-related information technology enhancements, and reliability and maintenance projects for our Specialties business. Renewable Fuels Capital spending for the Renewable Fuels segment during the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, was $1.5 billion, primarily related to the construction of facilities to produce renewable fuels at the Rodeo Complex. Corporate and Other Capital spending for Corporate and Other during the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, was $290 million, primarily related to information technology and facilities. 2025 Budget Our 2025 capital budget is $2.1 billion, including $998 million for sustaining capital and $1.1 billion for growth capital. Our projected $2.1 billion capital budget excludes our portion of planned capital spending by our major joint ventures CPChem and WRB totaling $885 million and acquisitions, including the pending acquisition of EPIC Y-Grade, which is subject to regulatory approval and completion of other customary closing conditions. See Note 5—Business Combinations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the pending acquisition of EPIC Y-Grade. The Midstream capital budget of $975 million comprises $429 million for sustaining projects and $546 million for growth projects. The Midstream capital budget advances the integrated NGL wellhead-to-market value chain by strengthening our position in key basins, including by increasing gas processing capacity. In Refining, we plan to invest $822 million, including $414 million for sustaining capital. Refining growth capital of $408 million supports high-return, low-capital projects that will increase asset reliability and improve market capture. The M&S capital budget of $154 million reflects the continued enhancement of our branded network. The Renewable Fuels capital budget of $74 million reflects investments at the Rodeo Complex related to feedstock optimization and logistics for renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel production. The Corporate and Other capital budget of $75 million will primarily fund information technology projects. 75 Contingencies A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims that arose in the ordinary course of business have been filed against us or are subject to indemnifications provided by us. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for financial recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. In the case of income tax-related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is uncertain. Other than with respect to the legal matters described herein, based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include contingent liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other potentially responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes. Legal and Tax Matters Our legal and tax matters are handled by our legal and tax organizations, respectively. These organizations apply their knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases and uncertain tax positions. We employ a litigation management process to manage and monitor legal proceedings. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases and enables the tracking of those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required. In the case of income tax-related contingencies, we monitor tax legislation and court decisions, the status of tax audits and the statute of limitations within which a taxing authority can assert a liability. 76 Propel Fuels Litigation In late 2017, as part of Phillips 66 Company’s evaluation of various opportunities in the renewable fuels business, Phillips 66 Company engaged with Propel Fuels, a California company that distributes E85 and other alternative fuels through fueling kiosks. Ultimately, the parties were not able to reach an agreement and negotiations were terminated in August 2018. On February 17, 2022, Propel Fuels filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (the Propel Court), alleging that Phillips 66 Company misappropriated trade secrets related to Propel Fuels’ renewable fuels business during and after due diligence. On October 16, 2024, a jury returned a verdict against Phillips 66 Company for $604.9 million in compensatory damages and issued a willfulness finding. In 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on motions anticipated to be filed by Propel Fuels seeking exemplary damages and attorneys’ fees. Propel Fuels has asked the Propel Court to grant treble damages and Phillips 66 Company has filed a brief in opposition to that request. Also in 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on Phillips 66 Company’s motions for a judgment in its favor as a matter of law, or in the alternative to reduce the jury’s verdict or to grant a new trial. Phillips 66 Company denies any wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend its position. As a result of the jury verdict, the Company has recorded an accrual of $604.9 million which is included in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024, and is reported in the M&S segment. In addition, the accrued amount is reflected as “Other liabilities and deferred credits” on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. However, it is reasonably possible that the estimate of the loss could change based on the progression of the case, including the appeals process. Because of the uncertainties associated with ongoing litigation, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss that may be attributable to exemplary damages, if any, in excess of the amount accrued. If information were to become available that would allow us to reasonably estimate a range of potential exposure in an amount higher or lower than the amount already accrued, we would adjust our accrued liabilities accordingly. While Phillips 66 Company believes the jury verdict is not legally or factually supported and intends to pursue post-judgment remedies and file an appeal, there can be no assurances that such defense efforts will be successful. To the extent Phillips 66 Company is required to pay exemplary damages, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Environmental We are subject to numerous international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Among the most significant of these international and federal environmental laws and regulations are the: • U.S. Federal Clean Air Act, which governs air emissions. • U.S. Federal Clean Water Act, which governs discharges into bodies of water. • European Union Regulation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (EU REACH), which governs production, marketing and use of chemicals and the United Kingdom’s legislation for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, which replaced EU REACH in the United Kingdom in 2021 following the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (BREXIT). • U.S. Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), which imposes liability on generators, transporters and arrangers of hazardous substances at sites where hazardous substance releases have occurred or are threatening to occur. • U.S. Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which governs the treatment, storage and disposal of solid waste. • U.S. Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, which requires facilities to report toxic chemical inventories to local emergency planning committees and response departments. • U.S. Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990, under which owners and operators of onshore facilities and pipelines as well as owners and operators of vessels are liable for removal costs and damages that result from a discharge of crude oil into navigable waters of the United States. • European Union Trading Directive resulting in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), which uses a market-based mechanism to incentivize the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as well as the United Kingdom Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS), which replaced the EU ETS in the United Kingdom in 2021, following BREXIT. 77 These laws and their implementing regulations set limits on emissions and, in the case of discharges to water, establish water quality limits. They also, in most cases, require permits in association with new or modified operations. These permits can require an applicant to collect substantial information in connection with the application process, which can be expensive and time consuming. In addition, there can be delays associated with notice and comment periods and the agency’s processing of the application. Many of the delays associated with the permitting process are beyond the control of the applicant. Other countries and many states where we operate also have, or are developing, similar environmental laws and regulations governing these same types of activities. While similar, in some cases these regulations may impose additional, or more stringent, requirements that can add to the cost and difficulty of developing infrastructure and marketing and transporting products across state and international borders. For example, in California the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) approved amendments to the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) that became effective in 2016, which required a phased reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions through 2022, affecting refineries in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. In 2017, SCAQMD required additional nitrogen oxide emissions reductions through 2025 and, on November 5, 2021, promulgated new regulations to replace the RECLAIM program with a traditional command and control regulatory regime. The ultimate financial impact arising from environmental laws and regulations is neither clearly known nor easily determinable as new standards, such as air emissions standards, water quality standards and stricter fuel regulations, continue to evolve. However, environmental laws and regulations, including those that may arise to address concerns about global climate change, are expected to continue to have an increasing impact on our operations in the United States and in other countries in which we operate. Notable areas of potential impacts include air emissions compliance and remediation obligations in the United States. An example of this in the fuels area is the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). The law requires fuel producers and importers to provide additional renewable fuels for transportation motor fuels and stipulates a mix of various types. Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) form the mechanism used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to record compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). If an obligated party has more RINs than it needs to meet its obligation, it may sell or trade the extra RINs, or instead choose to “bank” them for use the following year. We have met the EPA’s renewable volume obligations (RVO) to date. These obligations have been met using a variety of operating and capital strategies. We are also implementing advanced and different technologies to address projected future RVOs. On June 21, 2023, the EPA finalized RVO for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 compliance years. These standards increase cellulosic volumes, which reflect the EPA’s forecast for increasing compressed natural gas and NGL volumes derived from biogas. In addition, the EPA increased total advanced biofuel volumes from the 5.63 billion gallons established for the 2022 compliance year to 7.33 billion gallons in 2025. We may experience a decrease in demand for refined petroleum products and increased program costs if not fully recovered in the market. This program continues to be the subject of possible Congressional review and re-promulgation in revised form, and the EPA’s final regulations establishing RVO requirements have been and continue to be subject to legal challenge, further creating uncertainty regarding RVO requirements. We are required to purchase RINs in the open market to satisfy the portion of our obligation under the RFS that is not fulfilled by blending renewable fuels into the motor fuels we produce. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we were able to fully satisfy our obligations under the RFS through blending renewable fuels into the motor fuel we produce. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we incurred expenses of $323 million and $478 million, respectively, associated with our obligation to purchase RINs in the open market to comply with the RFS for our wholly owned refineries. These expenses are included in the “Purchased crude oil and products” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Our jointly owned refineries also incurred expenses associated with the purchase of RINs in the open market, of which our share was $255 million, $389 million and $437 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. These expenses are included in the “Equity in earnings of affiliates” line item on our consolidated statement of income. The amount of these expenses and fluctuations between periods is primarily driven by the market price of RINs, refinery and renewable fuels production, blending activities, and RVO requirements. 78 We also are subject to certain laws and regulations relating to environmental remediation obligations associated with current and past operations, including CERCLA and RCRA and their state equivalents. Remediation obligations include cleanup responsibility arising from petroleum releases from underground storage tanks located at numerous previously and currently owned and/or operated petroleum-marketing outlets throughout the United States. Federal and state laws require contamination caused by such underground storage tank releases be assessed and remediated to meet applicable standards. In addition to other cleanup standards, many states have adopted cleanup criteria for methyl tertiary-butyl ether for soil and groundwater and both the EPA and many states may adopt cleanup standards for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances, which may have been a constituent in certain firefighting foams used or stored at or near some of our facilities. At RCRA-permitted facilities, we are required to assess environmental conditions. If conditions warrant, we may be required to remediate contamination caused by prior operations. In contrast to CERCLA, which is often referred to as “Superfund,” the cost of corrective action activities under RCRA corrective action programs is typically borne solely by us. We anticipate increased expenditures for RCRA remediation activities may be required, but such annual expenditures for the near term are not expected to vary significantly from the range of such expenditures we have experienced over the past few years. Longer-term expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and may fluctuate significantly. We occasionally receive requests for information or notices of potential liability from the EPA and state environmental agencies alleging that we are a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or an equivalent state statute. On occasion, we also have been made a party to cost recovery litigation by those agencies or by private parties. These requests, notices and lawsuits assert potential liability for remediation costs at various sites that typically are not owned by us, but allegedly contain wastes attributable to our past operations. At December 31, 2023, we reported that we had been notified of potential liability under CERCLA and comparable state laws at 21 sites within the United States. During 2024, our legal organization approved the removal of two sites, which left 19 unresolved sites with potential liability at December 31, 2024. For the majority of Superfund sites, our potential liability will be less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste attributable to us, versus that attributable to all other potentially responsible parties, is relatively low. Although liability of those potentially responsible is generally joint and several for federal sites and frequently so for state sites, other potentially responsible parties at sites where we are a party typically have had the financial strength to meet their obligations, and where they have not, or where potentially responsible parties could not be located, our share of liability has not increased materially. Many of the sites for which we are potentially responsible are still under investigation by the EPA or the state agencies concerned. Prior to actual cleanup, those potentially responsible normally assess site conditions, apportion responsibility and determine the appropriate remediation. In some instances, we may have no liability or attain a settlement of liability. Actual cleanup costs generally occur after the parties obtain the EPA or equivalent state agency approval of a remediation plan. There are relatively few sites where we are a major participant, and given the timing and amounts of anticipated expenditures, neither the cost of remediation at those sites nor such costs at all CERCLA sites, in the aggregate, is expected to have a material adverse effect on our competitive or financial condition. We incur costs related to the prevention, control, abatement or elimination of environmental pollution. Expensed environmental costs were $849 million in 2024 and are expected to be approximately $923 million and $791 million in 2025 and 2026, respectively. Capitalized environmental costs were $111 million in 2024 and are expected to be approximately $168 million and $231 million, in 2025 and 2026, respectively. These amounts do not include capital expenditures made for other purposes that have an indirect benefit on environmental compliance. Accrued liabilities for remediation activities are not reduced for potential recoveries from insurers or other third parties and are not discounted (except those assumed in a business combination, which we record on a discounted basis). 79 Many of these liabilities result from CERCLA, RCRA and similar state laws that require us to undertake certain investigative and remedial activities at sites where we conduct or once conducted operations, or at sites where our generated waste was disposed. We also have accrued for a number of sites we identified that may require environmental remediation, but which are not currently the subject of CERCLA, RCRA or state enforcement activities. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. In the future, we may incur significant costs under both CERCLA and RCRA. Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, depending on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, and the presence or absence of potentially liable third parties. Therefore, it is difficult to develop reasonable estimates of future site remediation costs. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, and as with other companies engaged in similar businesses, environmental costs and liabilities are inherent concerns in certain of our operations and products, and there can be no assurance that those costs and liabilities will not be material. However, we currently do not expect any material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position as a result of compliance with current environmental laws and regulations. Climate Change There has been a broad range of proposed or promulgated state, national and international laws focusing on GHG emissions reduction, including various regulations proposed or issued by the EPA. These proposed or promulgated laws apply or could apply in states and/or countries where we have interests or may have interests in the future. Laws regulating GHG emissions continue to evolve, and while it is not possible to accurately estimate either a timetable for implementation or our future compliance costs relating to implementation, such laws potentially could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition as a result of increasing costs of compliance, lengthening project implementation and agency reviews, or reducing demand for certain hydrocarbon products. Examples of legislation or precursors for possible regulation that do or could affect our operations include: • EU ETS, which is part of the European Union’s policy to combat climate change and is a key tool for reducing industrial GHG emissions. EU ETS impacts factories, power stations and other installations across all EU member states. As a result of BREXIT, those types of entities in the United Kingdom are now subject to the UK ETS, rather than the EU ETS. • EU Renewable Energy Directive II, which increases the EU’s energy consumption from renewable sources in the electricity, heat, and transportation sectors to 32% by 2030. • United Kingdom’s Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation, which is intended to reduce the GHG emissions from fuel used in the United Kingdom transportation sector by encouraging the supply of renewable fuels. • California’s Senate Bill No. 32, which requires reduction of California's GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 emission level by 2030, and Assembly Bill 398, which extends the California GHG emission cap and trade program through 2030. Other GHG emissions programs in states in the western U.S. have been enacted or are under consideration or development, including amendments to California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard, California’s Advanced Clean Cars and Trucks Programs, California’s Carbon Neutrality by 2045 Scoping Plan, Oregon's Low Carbon Fuel Standard and Climate Protection Plan, and Washington's carbon reduction programs. • United States’ Inflation Reduction Act, which contains tax inducements and other provisions that incentivize investment, development, and deployment of alternative energy sources and technologies, which is intended to accelerate the energy transition. • The Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 127 S. Ct. 1438 (2007), confirming that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide as an “air pollutant” under the Federal Clean Air Act. • The EPA’s announcement on March 29, 2010 (published as “Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,” 75 Fed. Reg. 17004 (April 2, 2010)), and the EPA’s and U.S. Department of Transportation’s joint promulgation of a Final Rule on April 1, 2010, that triggers regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act. These collectively may lead to more climate-based claims for damages, and may result in longer agency review time for development projects to determine the extent of potential climate change. 80 • The EPA's 2015 Final Rule regulating GHG emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electrical generating units under the Federal Clean Air Act, commonly referred to as the Clean Power Plan. The EPA commenced rulemaking in 2017 to rescind the Clean Power Plan and, in August 2018, the EPA proposed the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule as its replacement. On January 19, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia invalidated the ACE rule and remanded the matter to the EPA, essentially restarting this rulemaking process. • Carbon taxes in certain jurisdictions. • GHG emission cap and trade programs in certain jurisdictions. In the EU, the first phase of the EU ETS completed at the end of 2007. Phase II was undertaken from 2008 through 2012, and Phase III ran from 2013 through to 2020. Phase IV runs from January 1, 2021 through 2030 and sectors covered under the ETS must reduce their GHG emissions by 43% compared to 2005 levels and there is agreement between the EU Member States, the European Parliament, and the EU Commission (which is pending ratification by the EU Council and European Parliament) to increase the Phase IV GHG emissions reduction to 63% by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. The United Kingdom is no longer part of the EU ETS and, instead, has been under the UK ETS since 2021. Phillips 66 has assets that are subject to the EU ETS and assets that are subject to the UK ETS. From November 30 to December 12, 2015, more than 190 countries, including the United States, participated in the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, France. The conference culminated in what is known as the “Paris Agreement,” which, upon certain conditions being met, entered into force on November 4, 2016. The Paris Agreement establishes a commitment by signatory parties to pursue domestic GHG emission reductions. In January 2025, President Trump signed an executive order directing the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, and it is expected that President Trump and the Republican-led Congress will diverge from the previous administration’s positions and GHG commitments. However, future emission reduction targets and other provisions of legislative or regulatory initiatives and policies enacted in the future by the United States could be brought by future administrations or, in the absence of federal action, states may become more active and focused on taking legislative or regulatory actions aimed at climate change and minimizing GHG emissions. In the United States, some additional form of regulation is likely to be forthcoming, particularly at the state level in the absence of federal action, with respect to GHG emissions. Such regulation could take any of several forms that may result in additional financial burden in the form of taxes, the restriction of output, investments of capital to maintain compliance with laws and regulations, or required acquisition or trading of emission allowances. Compliance with changes in laws and regulations that create a GHG emission trading program, GHG reduction requirements or carbon taxes could significantly increase our costs, reduce demand for fossil energy derived products, impact the cost and availability of capital and increase our exposure to litigation. Such laws and regulations could also increase demand for less carbon intensive energy sources. An example of one such program is California’s cap and trade program, which was promulgated pursuant to the State’s Global Warming Solutions Act. The program had been limited to certain stationary sources, which include our refineries in California, but beginning in January 2015 was expanded to include emissions from transportation fuels distributed in California. Inclusion of transportation fuels in California’s cap and trade program as currently promulgated has increased our cap and trade program compliance costs. Additionally, certain states have recently passed legislation seeking to recover financial damages allegedly associated with climate change from fossil fuel companies like the Vermont Climate Superfund Act passed by the Vermont Legislature in May 2024. While such novel laws and implementing regulations may be subject to legal challenges, additional states may follow suit. The ultimate impact on our financial performance, either positive or negative, from this and similar programs, will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: • Whether and to what extent legislation or regulation is enacted. • The nature of the legislation or regulation, such as a cap and trade system, a tax on emissions or financial damages. • The GHG reductions required. 81 • The price and availability of offsets. • The demand for, amount and allocation of allowances. • Technological and scientific developments leading to new products or services. • Any potential significant physical effects of climate change, such as increased severe weather events, changes in sea levels and changes in temperature. • Whether, and the extent to which, increased compliance costs are ultimately reflected in the prices of our products and services. We consider and take into account anticipated future GHG emissions in designing and developing major facilities and projects, and implement energy efficiency initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. Data on our GHG emissions, legal requirements regulating such emissions, and the possible physical effects of climate change on our coastal assets are incorporated into our planning, investment, and risk management decision-making. We are working to continuously improve operational and energy efficiency through resource and energy conservation efforts throughout our operations. In February 2022, we announced a target to reduce our Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions intensity related to our operations by 50% of 2019 levels by the year 2050. The 2050 target builds upon our 2030 GHG emissions intensity targets to reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from our operations by 30% and Scope 3 emissions from our energy products by 15% compared to 2019 levels. In addition to the disclosures above, we have issued our 2024 Sustainability and People Report that is accessible on our website and provides more detailed information regarding our environmental, social and governance and human capital initiatives, including information on environmental metrics and other topics of interest to our stakeholders, which may not be considered material for U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting purposes. The information contained in the Sustainability and People Report is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this Annual Report. 82 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to select appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for descriptions of our major accounting policies. Some of these accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is a reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts would have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. The following discussion of critical accounting estimates addresses accounting areas where the nature of accounting estimates or assumptions could be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change. Business Combination In accounting for a business combination, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests are recorded based on estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess or shortfall of the purchase price when compared to the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired, if any, is recorded as goodwill or a bargain purchase gain, respectively. A significant amount of judgment is made in estimating the individual fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, noncontrolling interests and other assets and liabilities. We use available information to make these fair value determinations and engage third-party specialists in the valuation process as necessary. The fair values of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests as of the acquisition date are often estimated using a combination of approaches, including the income approach, which requires us to project future cash flows and apply an appropriate discount rate; the cost approach, which requires estimates of replacement costs and depreciation and obsolescence estimates; and the market approach which uses market data and adjusts for entity specific differences. The estimates used in determining fair values are based on assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from the estimated results used to determine fair value. See Note 5—Business Combinations, and Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our acquisitions. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Equity Method Investments Long-lived assets used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in future expected cash flows. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future before-tax cash flows of an asset group is less than the carrying value, including applicable liabilities, the carrying value is written down to estimated fair value. Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes based on a judgmental assessment of the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets. Because there usually is a lack of quoted market prices for long-lived assets, the fair value of impaired assets is typically determined using one or more of the following methods: the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates and other assumptions believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants; a market multiple for similar assets; historical market transactions including similar assets, adjusted using principal market participant assumptions when necessary; or replacement cost adjusted for physical deterioration and economic obsolescence. The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviews and related fair value calculations are based on judgmental assessments, including future volumes, commodity prices, operating costs, margins, discount rates and capital project decisions, considering all available information at the date of review. 83 Investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for under the equity method are assessed for impairment when there are indicators of a loss in value, such as a lack of sustained earnings capacity or a current fair value less than the investment’s carrying amount. When it is determined that an indicated impairment is other than temporary, a charge is recognized for the difference between the investment’s carrying value and its estimated fair value. When determining whether a decline in value is other than temporary, management considers factors such as the duration and extent of the decline, the investee’s financial condition and near-term prospects, and our ability and intention to retain our investment for a period that allows for recovery. When quoted market prices are not available, the fair value is usually based on the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates and other assumptions believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants and observed market earnings multiples of comparable companies, if appropriate. Different assumptions could affect the timing and the amount of an impairment of an investment in any period. See Note 12—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information about impairments. 84 GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION We have various cross guarantees between Phillips 66 and its wholly owned subsidiary Phillips 66 Company (together, the Obligor Group) with respect to publicly held debt securities. Phillips 66 conducts substantially all of its operations through subsidiaries, including Phillips 66 Company, and those subsidiaries generate substantially all of its operating income and cash flow. Phillips 66 has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of Phillips 66 Company with respect to its publicly held debt securities. In addition, Phillips 66 Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of Phillips 66 with respect to its publicly held debt securities. All guarantees are full and unconditional. At December 31, 2024, $14.4 billion of senior unsecured notes outstanding has been guaranteed by the Obligor Group. Summarized financial information of the Obligor Group is presented on a combined basis. Intercompany transactions among the members of the Obligor Group have been eliminated. The financial information of non-guarantor subsidiaries has been excluded from the summarized financial information. Significant intercompany transactions and receivable/payable balances between the Obligor Group and non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented separately in the summarized financial information. 85 The summarized results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the summarized financial position at December 31, 2024, of the Obligor Group on a combined basis were: Summarized Combined Statement of Income Millions of Dollars Sales and other operating revenues $ 108,141 Revenues and other income—non-guarantor subsidiaries 11,576 Purchased crude oil and products—third parties 64,734 Purchased crude oil and products—related parties 20,519 Purchased crude oil and products—non-guarantor subsidiaries 27,748 Loss before income taxes (747) Net loss (533) Summarized Combined Balance Sheet Millions of Dollars Accounts and notes receivable—third parties $ 1,229 Accounts and notes receivable—related parties 1,422 Due from non-guarantor subsidiaries, current 3,102 Total current assets 10,228 Investments and long-term receivables 10,640 Net properties, plants and equipment 12,186 Goodwill 1,047 Due from non-guarantor subsidiaries, noncurrent 1,171 Other assets associated with non-guarantor subsidiaries 1,306 Total noncurrent assets 28,380 Total assets 38,608 Due to non-guarantor subsidiaries, current $ 5,398 Total current liabilities 14,236 Long-term debt 14,969 Due to non-guarantor subsidiaries, noncurrent 8,319 Total noncurrent liabilities 29,640 Total liabilities 43,876 Total equity (5,268) Total liabilities and equity 38,608 86 NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS Refining Our realized refining margins measure the difference between (a) sales and other operating revenues derived from the sale of petroleum products manufactured at our refineries and (b) costs of feedstocks, primarily crude oil, used to produce the petroleum products. The realized refining margins are adjusted to include our proportional share of our joint venture refineries’ realized margins, as well as to exclude those items that are not representative of the underlying operating performance of a period, which we call “special items.” The realized refining margins are converted to a per- barrel basis by dividing them by total refinery processed inputs (primarily crude oil) measured on a barrel basis, including our share of inputs processed by our joint venture refineries. Our realized refining margin per barrel is intended to be comparable with industry refining margins, which are known as “crack spreads.” As discussed in “Executive Overview and Business Environment—Business Environment,” industry crack spreads measure the difference between market prices for refined petroleum products and crude oil. We believe realized refining margin per barrel calculated on a similar basis as industry crack spreads provides a useful measure of how well we performed relative to benchmark industry refining margins. The GAAP performance measure most directly comparable to realized refining margin per barrel is the Refining segment’s “income (loss) before income taxes per barrel.” Realized refining margin per barrel excludes items that are typically included in a manufacturer’s gross margin, such as depreciation and operating expenses, and other items used to determine income (loss) before income taxes, such as general and administrative expenses. It also includes our proportional share of joint venture refineries’ realized refining margins and excludes special items. Because realized refining margin per barrel is calculated in this manner, and because realized refining margin per barrel may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, it has limitations as an analytical tool. Following are reconciliations of income (loss) before income taxes to realized refining margins: 87 Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated Realized Refining Margins Atlantic Basin/Europe Gulf Coast Central Corridor West Coast Worldwide Year Ended December 31, 2024 Income (loss) before income taxes $ (59) (68) 670 (908) (365) Plus: Taxes other than income taxes 85 111 98 93 387 Depreciation, amortization and impairments 211 262 172 538 1,183 Selling, general and administrative expenses 43 32 102 32 209 Operating expenses 1,024 1,170 557 976 3,727 Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates 7 (2) (55) — (50) Other segment (income) expense, net 46 8 (45) 14 23 Proportional share of refining gross margins contributed by equity affiliates 107 — 809 — 916 Special items: Certain tax impacts (9) — — — (9) Legal settlement — (7) — — (7) Realized refining margins $ 1,455 1,506 2,308 745 6,014 Total processed inputs (thousands of barrels) 196,067 196,055 108,563 87,631 588,316 Adjusted total processed inputs (thousands of barrels)* 196,067 196,055 200,290 87,631 680,043 Income (loss) before income taxes per barrel (dollars per barrel)** $ (0.30) (0.35) 6.18 (10.38) (0.62) Realized refining margins (dollars per barrel)*** 7.42 7.68 11.52 8.50 8.84 Year Ended December 31, 2023 Income before income taxes $ 816 1,744 2,241 539 5,340 Plus: Taxes other than income taxes 71 106 94 111 382 Depreciation, amortization and impairments 209 246 163 223 841 Selling, general and administrative expenses 42 19 77 31 169 Operating expenses 1,097 1,104 736 1,308 4,245 Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates 8 (2) (445) — (439) Other segment (income) expense, net 16 17 (67) (3) (37) Proportional share of refining gross margins contributed by equity affiliates 90 — 1,257 — 1,347 Special items: Certain tax impacts (15) — — — (15) Realized refining margins $ 2,334 3,234 4,056 2,209 11,833 Total processed inputs (thousands of barrels) 182,213 206,356 102,774 116,615 607,958 Adjusted total processed inputs (thousands of barrels)* 182,213 206,356 180,251 116,615 685,435 Income before income taxes per barrel (dollars per barrel)** $ 4.48 8.44 21.81 4.63 8.78 Realized refining margins (dollars per barrel)*** 12.80 15.67 22.50 18.95 17.26 * Adjusted total processed inputs include our proportional share of processed inputs of an equity affiliate. ** Income (loss) before income taxes divided by total processed inputs. *** Realized refining margins per barrel, as presented, are calculated using the underlying realized refining margin amounts, in dollars, divided by adjusted total processed inputs, in barrels. As such, recalculated per barrel amounts using the rounded margins and barrels presented may differ from the presented per barrel amounts. 88 Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated Realized Refining Margins Atlantic Basin/Europe Gulf Coast Central Corridor West Coast Worldwide Year Ended December 31, 2022 Income before income taxes $ 2,402 2,252 2,431 891 7,976 Plus: Taxes other than income taxes 53 87 57 88 285 Depreciation, amortization and impairments 203 250 147 273 873 Selling, general and administrative expenses 41 19 62 29 151 Operating expenses 1,242 1,230 809 1,450 4,731 Equity in (earnings) losses of affiliates 9 7 (763) — (747) Other segment (income) expense, net (32) 1 (2) (4) (37) Proportional share of refining gross margins contributed by equity affiliates 93 — 1,668 — 1,761 Special items: Regulatory compliance costs 9 26 22 13 70 Realized refining margins $ 4,020 3,872 4,431 2,740 15,063 Total processed inputs (thousands of barrels) 199,319 203,269 97,997 112,156 612,741 Adjusted total processed inputs (thousands of barrels)* 199,319 203,269 177,111 112,156 691,855 Income before income taxes per barrel (dollars per barrel)** $ 12.05 11.08 24.81 7.94 13.02 Realized refining margins (dollars per barrel)*** 20.17 19.05 25.02 24.43 21.77 * Adjusted total processed inputs include our proportional share of processed inputs of an equity affiliate. ** Income before income taxes divided by total processed inputs. *** Realized refining margins per barrel, as presented, are calculated using the underlying realized refining margin amounts, in dollars, divided by adjusted total processed inputs, in barrels. As such, recalculated per barrel amounts using the rounded margins and barrels presented may differ from the presented per barrel amounts. 89 Marketing Our realized marketing fuel margins measure the difference between (a) sales and other operating revenues derived from the sale of fuels in our M&S segment and (b) costs of those fuels. The realized marketing fuel margins are adjusted to exclude those items that are not representative of the underlying operating performance of a period, which we call “special items.” The realized marketing fuel margins are converted to a per-barrel basis by dividing them by sales volumes measured on a barrel basis. We believe realized marketing fuel margin per barrel demonstrates the value uplift our marketing operations provide by optimizing the placement and ultimate sale of our facilities’ fuel production. Within the M&S segment, the GAAP performance measure most directly comparable to realized marketing fuel margin per barrel is the marketing business’ “income before income taxes per barrel.” Realized marketing fuel margin per barrel excludes items that are typically included in gross margin, such as depreciation and operating expenses, and other items used to determine income before income taxes, such as general and administrative expenses. Because realized marketing fuel margin per barrel excludes these items, and because realized marketing fuel margin per barrel may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, it has limitations as an analytical tool. Following are reconciliations of income before income taxes to realized marketing fuel margins: Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated U.S. International 2024 2023 2022 2024 2023 2022 Realized Marketing Fuel Margins Income before income taxes $ 303 1,151 1,177 447 532 647 Plus: Depreciation and amortization 38 23 14 116 76 72 Selling, general and administrative expenses 1,434 813 808 265 249 251 Equity in earnings of affiliates (29) (53) (71) (106) (116) (115) Other operating revenues* (467) (477) (508) (34) (31) (3) Other expense, net 61 27 24 20 14 3 Special items: Legal settlement (59) — — — — — Net gain on asset disposition — — — (67) — — Marketing margins 1,281 1,484 1,444 641 724 855 Less: margin for nonfuel related sales — — — 56 52 51 Realized marketing fuel margins $ 1,281 1,484 1,444 585 672 804 Total fuel sales volumes (thousands of barrels) 742,467 698,961 680,930 113,712 112,607 114,384 Income before income taxes per barrel (dollars per barrel) $ 0.41 1.65 1.73 3.93 4.72 5.66 Realized marketing fuel margins (dollars per barrel)** 1.73 2.12 2.12 5.15 5.96 7.03 * Includes other nonfuel revenues and expenses. ** Realized marketing fuel margins per barrel, as presented, are calculated using the underlying realized marketing fuel margin amounts, in dollars, divided by sales volumes, in barrels. As such, recalculated per barrel amounts using the rounded margins and barrels presented may differ from the presented per barrel amounts. 90 Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Financial Instrument Market Risk We and certain of our subsidiaries are exposed to market risks produced by changes in the prices of crude oil, refined petroleum products, NGL, natural gas, renewable feedstocks and renewable fuels, and electric power, as well as fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We and certain of our subsidiaries may hold and use derivative contracts to manage these risks. Commodity Price Risk Generally, our policy is to remain exposed to the market prices of commodities. Consistent with this policy, we use derivative contracts to convert our exposure from fixed-price sales or purchase contracts, often specified in contracts with refined product customers, back to floating market prices. We also use futures, forwards, swaps and options in various markets to accomplish the following objectives: • Balance physical systems or meet our refinery requirements and market demand. In addition to cash settlement prior to contract expiration, certain exchange-traded futures may be settled by physical delivery of the underlying commodity. • Enable us to use the market knowledge gained from our physical commodity market activities to capture market opportunities, such as moving physical commodities to more profitable locations, storing commodities to capture seasonal or time premiums, and blending commodities to capture quality upgrades. Derivatives may be utilized to optimize these activities. • Manage the risk to our cash flows from price exposures on specific crude oil, refined petroleum product, NGL, renewable feedstocks and natural gas transactions. These objectives optimize the value of our supply chain and may reduce our exposure to fluctuations in market prices. Our use of derivative instruments is governed by an “Authority Limitations” document approved by our Board of Directors. This document prohibits the use of highly leveraged derivatives or derivative instruments without sufficient market liquidity for comparable valuations, and establishes Value at Risk (VaR) limits. Compliance with these limits is monitored daily by our global risk group. We use a VaR model to estimate the loss in fair value that could potentially result on a single day from the effect of adverse changes in market conditions on the derivative commodity instruments held or issued. Using Monte Carlo simulation, a 95% confidence level and a one-day holding period, the VaR for derivative commodity instruments issued or held at December 31, 2024 and 2023, was immaterial to our cash flows and results of operations. Interest Rate Risk Our use of fixed- or variable-rate debt directly exposes us to interest rate risk. Fixed-rate debt, such as our senior notes, exposes us to changes in the fair value of our debt due to changes in market interest rates. Fixed-rate debt also exposes us to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with new debt at higher rates, or that we may be obligated to pay rates higher than the current market. Variable-rate debt, such as our floating-rate notes or borrowings under our revolving credit facility, exposes us to short-term changes in market rates that impact our interest expense. The following tables provide information about our debt instruments that are sensitive to changes in U.S. interest rates. These tables present principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted-average variable rates are based on effective rates at each reporting date. The carrying amount of our floating-rate debt approximates its fair value. The fair value of the fixed-rate financial instruments is estimated based on observable market prices. 91 Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated Expected Maturity Date Fixed Rate Maturity Average Interest Rate Floating Rate Maturity Average Interest Rate Year-End 2024 2025 $ 584 5.19 % $ 1,210 5.05 % 2026 992 2.42 550 5.45 2027 1,250 5.22 — — 2028 1,300 3.84 — — 2029 1,200 4.14 — — Remaining years 12,776 4.94 — — Total $ 18,102 $ 1,760 Fair value $ 16,913 $ 1,760 Millions of Dollars, Except as Indicated Expected Maturity Date Fixed Rate Maturity Average Interest Rate Floating Rate Maturity Average Interest Rate Year-End 2023 2024 $ 1,100 1.32 % $ 350 6.38 % 2025 1,975 4.43 — — 2026 992 2.42 1,250 6.46 2027 1,250 5.22 25 6.51 2028 1,300 3.84 — — Remaining years 10,676 4.74 290 6.46 Total $ 17,293 $ 1,915 Fair value $ 16,718 $ 1,915 Foreign Currency Risk We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our international operations. Generally, we do not hedge our foreign currency risk. In October 2024, we entered into a foreign currency derivative instrument and recognized a before-tax gain of $67 million. The instrument is in connection with the sale of our 49% ownership interest in Coop, which closed in January 2025. This instrument was settled in January 2025. For additional information, see Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables. Risk Monitoring Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer monitor risks to our business resulting from commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. For additional information about our use of derivative instruments, see Note 18—Derivatives and Financial Instruments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 92 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can normally identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target,” “priorities” and similar expressions that convey the prospective nature of events or outcomes, but the absence of such words does not mean a statement is not forward-looking. We based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates and projections about us, our operations, our joint ventures and entities in which we have equity interests, as well as the industries in which we and they operate, and our sustainability-related plans and goals. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report, as they are not guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions that, while made in good faith, may prove to be incorrect, and involve risks and uncertainties we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have expressed or forecasted in any forward-looking statement. Our sustainability-related goals are not guarantees or promises and may change. Statements regarding our goals are not guarantees or promises that they will be met. The information included in, and any issues identified as material for purposes of, our sustainability reports shall not be considered material for SEC reporting purposes. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements include: • Fluctuations in market conditions and demand impacting the prices of NGL, crude oil, refined petroleum products, renewable fuels, renewable feedstocks and natural gas prices and changes in refined product, marketing and petrochemical margins. • Changes in governmental policies relating to NGL, crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum or renewable fuels products pricing, regulation or taxation, including exports. • Capacity constraints in, or other limitations on, the pipelines, storage and fractionation facilities to which we deliver natural gas or NGL and the availability of alternative markets and arrangements for our natural gas and NGL. • Actions taken by OPEC and non-OPEC oil producing countries impacting crude oil production and correspondingly, commodity prices. • Unexpected changes in costs or technical requirements for constructing, modifying or operating our facilities or transporting our products. • Unexpected technological or commercial difficulties in manufacturing, refining or transporting our products, including chemical products. • Changes in the cost or availability of adequate and reliable transportation for our NGL, crude oil, natural gas and refined petroleum and renewable fuels products. • The level and success of producers’ drilling plans and the amount and quality of production volumes around our midstream assets. • Our ability to timely obtain or maintain permits, including those necessary for capital projects. • Our ability to comply with government regulations or make capital expenditures required to maintain compliance. • Our ability to realize sustained savings and cost reductions from the company’s business transformation initiatives. • Changes to government policies relating to renewable fuels, climate change and GHG emissions that adversely affect programs like the renewable fuel standards program, low carbon fuel standards and tax credits for biofuels. • Domestic and international economic and political developments including armed hostilities, such as the war in Eastern Europe, instability in the financial services and banking sector, excess inflation, expropriation of assets and changes in fiscal policy, including interest rates. 93 • The impact on commercial activity and demand for our products from any widespread public health crisis, as well as the extent and duration of recovery of economies and demand for our products following any such crisis. • Failure to complete definitive agreements and feasibility studies for, and to complete construction of, announced and future capital projects on time and within budget. • Our ability to successfully complete, or any material delay in the completion of, any asset dispositions, acquisitions, shutdowns or conversions that we may pursue, including the receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals or permits related to such action. • Potential disruption or interruption of our operations or those of our joint ventures due to litigation or governmental or regulatory action. • Damage to our facilities due to accidents, weather and climate events, civil unrest, insurrections, political events, terrorism or cyberattacks. • Our sustainability goals, including reducing our GHG emissions intensity, developing and protecting new technologies, and commercializing lower-carbon opportunities. • Failure of new products and services to achieve market acceptance. • International monetary conditions and exchange controls. • Substantial investments required, or reduced demand for products, as a result of existing or future environmental rules and regulations, including GHG emissions reductions and reduced consumer demand for refined petroleum products. • Liability resulting from pending or future litigation or other legal proceedings. • Liability for remedial actions, including removal and reclamation obligations under environmental regulations. • Changes in tax, environmental and other laws and regulations (including alternative energy mandates) applicable to our business. • Economic, political and regulatory conditions domestically and internationally, including imposition of tariffs or other tax incentives or disincentives. • Political and societal concerns about climate change that could result in changes to our business or operations or increase expenditures, including litigation-related expenses. • Changes in estimates or projections used to assess fair value of intangible assets, goodwill, and properties, plants and equipment and/or strategic decisions or other developments with respect to our asset portfolio that cause impairment charges. • Limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to changes to our credit profile or illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets. • The creditworthiness of our customers and the counterparties to our transactions, including the impact of bankruptcies. • Cybersecurity incidents or other disruptions that compromise our information and expose us to liability. • The operation, financing and distribution decisions of our joint ventures that we do not control. • The potential impact of activist shareholder actions or tactics. • The factors generally described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this report. 94 Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA PHILLIPS 66 INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page Report of Management 96 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 42) 97 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (DCP Midstream, LP) (PCAOB ID: 34) 101 Consolidated Financial Statements of Phillips 66: Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 102 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 103 Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2024 and 2023 104 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 105 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 106 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 108 95 Report of Management Management prepared, and is responsible for, the consolidated financial statements and the other information appearing in this Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements present fairly the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. In preparing its consolidated financial statements, the company includes amounts that are based on estimates and judgments management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The company’s financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors. Management has made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of the company’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of shareholders’ and directors’ meetings. Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Phillips 66’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the company’s management and directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Management assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management concluded the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024. Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, and their report is included herein. /s/ Mark E. Lashier /s/ Kevin J. Mitchell Mark E. Lashier Kevin J. Mitchell Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: February 21, 2025 96 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Phillips 66 Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Phillips 66 (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, based on our audits and, for 2023 and 2022, the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We did not audit the 2023 and 2022 financial statements of DCP Midstream, LP (DCP LP), a consolidated subsidiary, whose financial statements reflect total assets constituting 14% of the Company’s total assets as of December 31, 2023 and total revenues constituting 4% and 3% of the Company’s revenues and other income for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Those statements were audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for DCP LP for 2023 and 2022, is based solely on the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 97 Critical Audit Matter The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the Audit and Finance Committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Impairment assessment of WRB Refining LP, an equity method investment Description of the Matter As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company assesses investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate a loss in value that is other than temporary may have occurred. As discussed in Note 9 to the financial statements, the Company owns a 50% interest in WRB Refining LP (WRB), a joint venture that owns the Wood River and Borger refineries. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in WRB was $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2024. WRB’s earnings are subject to variability as they depend on, among other things, market conditions, the utilization of its refineries, cost levels and other factors relevant to its operations. Accordingly, significant judgment is required in determining whether events or changes in circumstances indicate a loss in value may have occurred that is indicative of a possible impairment. We determined the Company’s process for evaluating whether an other than temporary impairment of its investment in WRB has occurred is a critical audit matter because of the judgment and assumptions management uses to perform its identification and evaluation of such factors. How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls for the assessment of potential other than temporary impairments in WRB, which included identifying and evaluating events or changes in circumstances that could indicate a potential other than temporary impairment. We exercised professional judgment based on our knowledge of the industry and WRB’s business to assess the appropriateness of management’s conclusion that no such events existed or changes in circumstances had occurred as of December 31, 2024. In our evaluation, among other things, we performed inquiries of management and evaluated WRB’s prior and current operating earnings to assess its ability to sustain an earnings capacity that justifies the Company’s recorded investment in WRB and to assess the Company’s ability to recover its investment in WRB. In addition, we evaluated potential contrary evidence to management’s conclusion, considering both internally and externally available information, such as demand for WRB’s products, gross margins, costs, refinery utilization, and other operating information, as well as comparable market multiples. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011. Houston, Texas February 21, 2025 98 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Phillips 66 Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited Phillips 66’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Phillips 66 (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes, and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon, based on our audit and the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included under the heading “Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in the accompanying “Report of Management.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 99 Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Houston, Texas February 21, 2025 100 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors of DCP Midstream GP, LLC and the Unitholders of DCP Midstream, LP Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of DCP Midstream, LP and subsidiaries (the "Partnership") as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”) (not presented herein). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We did not audit the financial statements of Gulf Coast Express Pipeline, LLC, the Partnership’s investment which is accounted for by use of the equity method. The consolidated financial statements of the Partnership include its equity investment in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline, LLC of $385 million and $408 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and its equity earnings in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline, LLC of $68 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Gulf Coast Express Pipeline, LLC is based solely on the report of the other auditors. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Denver, Colorado February 21, 2024 We began serving as the Partnership’s auditor in 2004. In 2024 we became the predecessor auditor. 101 Consolidated Statement of Income Phillips 66 Millions of Dollars Years Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Revenues and Other Income Sales and other operating revenues $ 143,153 147,399 169,990 Equity in earnings of affiliates 1,779 2,017 2,968 Net gain on dispositions 321 115 7 Other income 243 359 2,737 Total Revenues and Other Income 145,496 149,890 175,702 Costs and Expenses Purchased crude oil and products 129,962 128,086 149,932 Operating expenses 5,939 6,154 6,111 Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,814 2,525 2,168 Depreciation and amortization 2,363 1,977 1,629 Impairments 456 24 60 Taxes other than income taxes 329 707 530 Accretion on discounted liabilities 40 29 23 Interest and debt expense 907 897 619 Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses 11 22 (9) Total Costs and Expenses 142,821 140,421 161,063 Income before income taxes 2,675 9,469 14,639 Income tax expense 500 2,230 3,248 Net Income 2,175 7,239 11,391 Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 58 224 367 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 $ 2,117 7,015 11,024 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 Per Share of Common Stock (dollars) Basic $ 5.01 15.56 23.36 Diluted 4.99 15.48 23.27 Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding (thousands) Basic 420,174 450,136 471,497 Diluted 421,888 453,210 473,731 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 102 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income Phillips 66 Millions of Dollars Years Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Net Income $ 2,175 7,239 11,391 Other comprehensive income (loss) Defined benefit plans Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period (23) (11) 191 Amortization of net actuarial loss, prior service credit and settlements 14 19 90 Plans sponsored by equity affiliates (19) (8) 80 Income taxes on defined benefit plans 8 2 (85) Defined benefit plans, net of income taxes (20) 2 276 Foreign currency translation adjustments (111) 182 (295) Income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments 6 (3) 4 Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income taxes (105) 179 (291) Cash flow hedges — (3) — Income taxes on hedging activities — — — Hedging activities, net of income taxes — (3) — Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Income Taxes (125) 178 (15) Comprehensive Income 2,050 7,417 11,376 Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests 58 224 367 Comprehensive Income Attributable to Phillips 66 $ 1,992 7,193 11,009 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 103 Consolidated Balance Sheet Phillips 66 Millions of Dollars At December 31 2024 2023 Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,738 3,323 Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowances of $70 million in 2024 and $71 million in 2023) 9,544 10,483 Accounts and notes receivable—related parties 1,489 1,247 Inventories 3,995 3,750 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,144 1,138 Total Current Assets 17,910 19,941 Investments and long-term receivables 14,378 15,302 Net properties, plants and equipment 35,264 35,712 Goodwill 1,575 1,550 Intangibles 1,161 920 Other assets 2,294 2,076 Total Assets $ 72,582 75,501 Liabilities Accounts payable $ 9,792 10,332 Accounts payable—related parties 512 569 Short-term debt 1,831 1,482 Accrued income and other taxes 1,060 1,200 Employee benefit obligations 732 863 Other accruals 1,160 1,410 Total Current Liabilities 15,087 15,856 Long-term debt 18,231 17,877 Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs 1,129 864 Deferred income taxes 7,101 7,424 Employee benefit obligations 703 630 Other liabilities and deferred credits 1,868 1,200 Total Liabilities 44,119 43,851 Equity Common stock (2,500,000,000 shares authorized at $0.01 par value) Issued (2024—656,987,861 shares; 2023—654,842,101 shares) Par value 7 7 Capital in excess of par 19,788 19,650 Treasury stock (at cost: 2024—248,594,923 shares; 2023—224,377,439 shares) (22,751) (19,342) Retained earnings 30,771 30,550 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (407) (282) Total Stockholders’ Equity 27,408 30,583 Noncontrolling interests 1,055 1,067 Total Equity 28,463 31,650 Total Liabilities and Equity $ 72,582 75,501 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 104 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Phillips 66 Millions of Dollars Years Ended December 31 2024 2023 2022 Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net income $ 2,175 7,239 11,391 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation and amortization 2,363 1,977 1,629 Impairments 456 24 60 Accretion on discounted liabilities 40 29 23 Deferred income taxes (251) 840 1,320 Undistributed equity earnings (411) (822) (1,308) Loss (gain) on early redemption of debt (3) 53 — Net gain on dispositions (321) (115) (7) Gain related to merger of businesses — — (3,013) Unrealized investment loss — 38 433 Other 758 (419) 217 Working capital adjustments Accounts and notes receivable 574 (696) (2,073) Inventories (278) (245) 74 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 44 269 (249) Accounts payable (491) (480) 1,736 Taxes and other accruals (464) (663) 580 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 4,191 7,029 10,813 Cash Flows From Investing Activities Capital expenditures and investments (1,859) (2,155) (1,888) Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (625) (263) (306) Purchases of government obligations (1,100) — — Return of investments in equity affiliates 141 201 125 Proceeds from asset dispositions 1,082 392 4 Advances/loans—related parties — — (75) Collection of advances/loans—related parties 4 3 662 Other (106) 32 (10) Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (2,463) (1,790) (1,488) Cash Flows From Financing Activities Issuance of debt 6,272 6,260 453 Repayment of debt (4,140) (4,252) (2,883) Issuance of common stock 86 123 103 Repurchase of common stock (3,451) (4,014) (1,513) Dividends paid on common stock (1,882) (1,882) (1,793) Distributions to noncontrolling interests (70) (163) (185) Repurchase of noncontrolling interests — (4,067) (500) Other (120) (97) (70) Net Cash Used in Financing Activities (3,305) (8,092) (6,388) Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents (8) 43 49 Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents (1,585) (2,810) 2,986 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 3,323 6,133 3,147 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 1,738 3,323 6,133 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 105 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Phillips 66 Millions of Dollars Attributable to Phillips 66 Common Stock Par Value Capital in Excess of Par Treasury Stock Retained Earnings Accum. Other Comprehensive Loss Noncontrolling Interests Total December 31, 2021 $ 7 20,504 (17,116) 16,216 (445) 2,471 21,637 Net income — — — 11,024 — 367 11,391 Other comprehensive loss — — — — (15) — (15) Dividends paid on common stock — — — (1,793) — — (1,793) Repurchase of common stock — — (1,540) — — — (1,540) Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (185) (185) Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in Phillips 66 Partners LP — (901) 3,380 — — (2,163) 316 Merger of DCP Midstream, LLC and Gray Oak Holdings LLC — — — — — 4,622 4,622 Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in DCP Midstream, LP — — — — — (500) (500) Benefit plan activity — 188 — (15) — — 173 December 31, 2022 7 19,791 (15,276) 25,432 (460) 4,612 34,106 Net income — — — 7,015 — 224 7,239 Other comprehensive income — — — — 178 — 178 Dividends paid on common stock — — — (1,882) — — (1,882) Repurchase of common stock — — (4,066) — — — (4,066) Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (163) (163) Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in DCP Midstream, LP — (361) — — — (3,613) (3,974) Benefit plan activity and other — 220 — (15) — 7 212 December 31, 2023 7 19,650 (19,342) 30,550 (282) 1,067 31,650 Net income — — — 2,117 — 58 2,175 Other comprehensive loss — — — — (125) — (125) Dividends paid on common stock — — — (1,882) — — (1,882) Repurchase of common stock — — (3,409) — — — (3,409) Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (70) (70) Benefit plan activity — 138 — (14) — — 124 December 31, 2024 $ 7 19,788 (22,751) 30,771 (407) 1,055 28,463 106 Shares Common Stock Issued Treasury Stock December 31, 2021 650,026,318 211,771,827 Repurchase of common stock — 16,583,076 Shares issued—share-based compensation 2,347,327 — Shares issued—acquisition of noncontrolling interest in Phillips 66 Partners LP — (41,825,236) December 31, 2022 652,373,645 186,529,667 Repurchase of common stock — 37,847,772 Shares issued—share-based compensation 2,468,456 — December 31, 2023 654,842,101 224,377,439 Repurchase of common stock — 24,217,484 Shares issued—share-based compensation 2,145,760 — December 31, 2024 656,987,861 248,594,923 Dollars Years Ended December 31 Dividends Paid Per Share of Common Stock 2022 $ 3.83 2023 4.20 2024 $ 4.50 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 107 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Phillips 66 Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Consolidation Principles and Investments Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) where we are the primary beneficiary. Undivided interests in pipelines, natural gas plants and terminals are consolidated on a proportionate basis. See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, for further discussion about a significant VIE that we began consolidating in August 2022, and Note 30—Phillips 66 Partners LP, for further discussion regarding our merger with Phillips 66 Partners LP (Phillips 66 Partners), a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66. The equity method is used to account for investments in affiliates in which we have the ability to exert significant influence over the affiliates’ operating and financial policies, including VIEs, of which we are not the primary beneficiary. Other securities and investments are generally carried at fair value, or cost less impairments, if any, adjusted up or down for price changes in similar financial instruments issued by the investee, when and if observed. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for further discussion on our significant unconsolidated VIEs. Recast Financial Information Certain prior period financial information has been recast and reclassified to reflect the current year’s presentation. See Note 29—Segment Disclosures and Related Information and Note 26—Cash Flow Information, for further information. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Foreign Currency Adjustments resulting from the process of translating financial statements with foreign functional currencies into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses result from remeasuring monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency into the functional currency of our subsidiary holding the asset or liability. We include these transaction gains and losses in current earnings (loss). Most of our foreign operations use their local currency as the functional currency. Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are highly liquid, short-term investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and will mature within 90 days or less from the date of acquisition. We carry these investments at cost plus accrued interest. Inventories We have several valuation methods for our various types of inventories and consistently use the following methods for each type of inventory. Crude oil and petroleum products inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market in the aggregate, primarily on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. Any necessary lower-of-cost-or-market write-downs at year end are recorded as permanent adjustments to the LIFO cost basis. LIFO is used to better match current inventory costs with current revenues and to meet tax-conformity requirements. Costs include both direct and indirect expenditures incurred in bringing an item or product to its existing condition and location. Materials and supplies inventories are valued using the weighted-average-cost method. 108 Fair Value Measurements We categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, through market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are used to measure fair value to the extent that relevant observable inputs are not available, and that reflect the assumptions we believe market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability for which there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. Derivative Instruments Derivative instruments, except those designated as normal purchases and normal sales, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We have master netting agreements with most of our exchange-cleared instrument counterparties and certain of our counterparties to other commodity instrument contracts (e.g., physical commodity forward contracts). We have elected to net derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty on the balance sheet if the legal right of offset exists and certain other criteria are met. When applicable, we also net collateral payables and receivables against derivative assets and derivative liabilities, respectively. Recognition and classification of the gain or loss that results from recording and adjusting a derivative to fair value depends on the purpose for issuing or holding the derivative. All realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivative instruments for which we do not apply hedge accounting are immediately recognized in our consolidated statement of income. Unrealized gains or losses from derivative instruments that qualify for and are designated as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and appear on the balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. However, to the extent the change in the fair value of a derivative instrument exceeds the change in the anticipated cash flows of the hedged transaction, the excess gain or loss is recognized immediately in earnings. Loans and Long-Term Receivables We enter into agreements with other parties to pursue business opportunities, which may require us to provide loans or advances to certain affiliated and nonaffiliated companies. Loans are recorded when cash is transferred or seller financing is provided to the affiliated or nonaffiliated company pursuant to a loan agreement. The loan balance will increase as interest is earned on the outstanding loan balance and will decrease as interest and principal payments are received. Interest is earned at the loan agreement’s stated interest rate. Loans and long-term receivables are evaluated for impairment based on an expected credit loss assessment. Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates Investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for under the equity method are assessed for impairment whenever changes in the facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value has occurred. When indicators exist, the fair value is estimated and compared to the investment carrying value. If any impairment is judgmentally determined to be other than temporary, the carrying value of the investment is written down to fair value. The fair value of the impaired investment is determined based on quoted market prices, if available, or upon the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates and other assumptions believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants and observed market earnings multiples of comparable companies. Depreciation and Amortization Depreciation and amortization of properties, plants and equipment (PP&E) are determined by either the individual-unit-straight-line method or the group-straight-line method (for those individual units that are highly integrated with other units). Capitalized Interest A portion of interest from external borrowings is capitalized on major projects with an expected construction period of one year or longer. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the related asset, and is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. 109 Impairment of Properties, Plants and Equipment PP&E used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in the future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset group. If indicators of potential impairment exist, an undiscounted cash flow test is performed. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future before-tax cash flows of an asset group is less than the carrying value of the asset group, including applicable liabilities, the carrying value of the PP&E included in the asset group is written down to estimated fair value and the write down is reported in the “Impairments” line item on our consolidated statement of income in the period in which the impairment determination is made. Individual assets are grouped for impairment testing purposes at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are available. Because there is usually a lack of quoted market prices for long-lived assets, the fair value of impaired assets is typically determined using one or more of the following methods: the present values of expected future cash flows using discount rates and other assumptions believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants; a market multiple of earnings for similar assets; historical market transactions for similar assets, adjusted using principal market participant assumptions when necessary; or replacement cost adjusted for physical deterioration and economic obsolescence. Long-lived assets held for sale are accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value, less cost to sell, with fair value determined using a binding negotiated price, if available, estimated replacement cost, or present value of expected future cash flows as previously described. The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviews and related fair value calculations are based on estimated future volumes, prices, costs, margins and capital project decisions, considering all available evidence at the date of review. Property Dispositions When complete units of depreciable property are sold, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated, with any gain or loss reflected in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated statement of income. When less than complete units of depreciable property are disposed of or retired, the difference between asset cost and salvage value is charged or credited to accumulated depreciation. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but is assessed for impairment annually and when events or changes in circumstance indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill is below its carrying value. The impairment assessment requires allocating goodwill and other assets and liabilities to reporting units. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined and compared to the book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value, an impairment is recognized for the amount by which the book value exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. A goodwill impairment cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. For purposes of assessing goodwill for impairment, we have three reporting units with goodwill balances at our 2024 testing date: Marketing and Specialties (M&S), Transportation and Natural Gas Liquids (NGL). Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested at least annually for impairment. Each reporting period, we evaluate intangible assets with indefinite useful lives to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support this classification. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are considered impaired if their fair value is lower than their net book value. The fair value of intangible assets is determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the fair value of intangible assets is determined based upon the present values of expected future cash flows using discount rates and other assumptions believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants, or upon estimated replacement cost, if expected future cash flows from the intangible asset are not determinable. 110 Asset Retirement Obligations When we have a legal obligation to incur costs to retire an asset, we record a liability in the period in which the obligation was incurred provided that a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. If a reasonable estimate of fair value cannot be made at the time the obligation arises, we record the liability when sufficient information is available to estimate its fair value. When a liability is initially recorded, we capitalize the costs by increasing the carrying amount of the related PP&E. Over time, the liability is increased for changes in present value, and the capitalized costs in PP&E are depreciated over the useful life of the related assets. If our estimate of the liability changes after initial recognition, we record an adjustment to the liability and PP&E. Our practice is to keep our refining and other processing assets in good operating condition through routine repair and maintenance of component parts in the ordinary course of business and by continuing to make improvements based on technological advances. As a result, we believe that generally these assets have no expected retirement dates for purposes of estimating asset retirement obligations since the dates or ranges of dates upon which we would retire these assets cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. We will recognize liabilities for these obligations in the period when sufficient information becomes available to estimate a date or range of potential retirement dates. See Note 4—Restructuring, for additional information regarding the change in asset retirement obligation related to our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery. Environmental Costs Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized, depending upon their future economic benefit. Expenditures relating to an existing condition caused by past operations, and those having no future economic benefit, are expensed. When environmental assessments or cleanups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated, environmental expenditures are accrued on an undiscounted basis (unless acquired in a business combination). Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, such as state reimbursement funds, are recorded as a reduction to environmental expenditures. Guarantees The fair value of a guarantee is determined and recorded as a liability at the time the guarantee is given. The initial liability is subsequently reduced as we are released from exposure under the guarantee. We amortize the guarantee liability over the relevant time period, if one exists, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each type of guarantee. We amortize the guarantee liability to the related statement of income line item based on the nature of the guarantee. In cases where the guarantee term is indefinite, we reverse the liability when we have information to support the reversal. When the performance on the guarantee becomes probable and the liability can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a separate liability for the excess amount above the guarantee’s book value based on the facts and circumstances at that time. We reverse the fair value liability only when there is no further exposure under the guarantee. Treasury Stock We record treasury stock purchases at cost, which includes related transaction costs and excise taxes. Amounts are recorded as reductions of stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheet. Common stock reissued from treasury stock is valued based on the average cost of historical repurchases. 111 Revenue Recognition Our revenues are primarily associated with sales of refined petroleum products and renewable fuels, crude oil, NGL and natural gas. Each gallon, or other unit of measure of product, is separately identifiable and represents a distinct performance obligation to which a transaction price is allocated. The transaction prices of our contracts with customers are either fixed or variable, with variable pricing based upon various market indices. For our contracts that include variable consideration, we utilize the variable consideration allocation exception, whereby the variable consideration is only allocated to the performance obligations that are satisfied during the period. The related revenue is recognized at a point in time when control passes to the customer, which is when title and the risk of ownership passes to the customer and physical delivery of goods occurs, either immediately or within a fixed delivery schedule that is reasonable and customary in the industry. The payment terms with our customers vary based on the product or service provided, but usually are 30 days or less. Revenues associated with pipeline transportation services are recognized at a point in time when the volumes are delivered based on contractual rates. Revenues associated with terminaling and storage services are recognized over time as the services are performed based on throughput volume or capacity utilization at contractual rates. Revenues associated with transactions commonly called buy/sell contracts, in which the purchase and sale of inventory with the same counterparty are entered into in contemplation of one another, are combined and reported in the “Purchased crude oil and products” line item on our consolidated statement of income (i.e., these transactions are recorded net). Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Excise taxes on sales of refined petroleum products and renewable fuels charged to our customers are presented net of taxes on sales of refined petroleum products and renewable fuels payable to governmental authorities in the “Taxes other than income taxes” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Other sales and value-added taxes are recorded net in the “Taxes other than income taxes” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Shipping and Handling Costs We have elected to account for shipping and handling costs as fulfillment activities and include these activities in the “Purchased crude oil and products” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Freight costs billed to customers are recorded in “Sales and other operating revenues.” Maintenance and Repairs Costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant improvements, are expensed when incurred. Major refinery maintenance turnarounds are expensed as incurred. Share-Based Compensation We recognize share-based compensation expense over the shorter of: (1) the service period (i.e., the stated period of time required to earn the award); or (2) the period beginning at the start of the service period and ending when an employee first becomes eligible for retirement, but not less than ten months for shared-based payment awards granted beginning in 2023 and not less than six months for share-based payment awards granted prior to 2023 as those are the minimum periods of time required for awards not to be subject to forfeiture. Our equity-classified programs generally provide accelerated vesting (i.e., a waiver of the remaining period of service required to earn an award) for awards held by employees at the time they become eligible for retirement (at age 55 with 5 years of service). We have elected to recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, irrespective of whether the award was granted with ratable or cliff vesting, and have elected to recognize forfeitures of awards when they occur. 112 Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income (loss) in the period that includes the enactment date. Income tax effects are released from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings, when applicable, on an individual item basis as those items are reclassified into income. Interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits is reflected in the “Interest and debt expense” line item, and penalties are reported in the “Operating expenses” or “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line items on our consolidated statement of income. Note 2—Changes in Accounting Principles Effective December 31, 2024, we adopted ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures.” This ASU improves reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements; however, it resulted in additional disclosures within Note 29— Segment Disclosures and Related Information. 113 Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers DCP Midstream, LLC and Gray Oak Holdings LLC Merger (DCP Midstream Merger) On August 17, 2022, we and our co-venturer, Enbridge Inc. (Enbridge), agreed to merge DCP Midstream, LLC (DCP Midstream) and Gray Oak Holdings LLC (Gray Oak Holdings), with DCP Midstream as the surviving entity. Prior to the DCP Midstream Merger, we and Enbridge each held a 50% interest and jointly governed DCP Midstream, whose primary assets are its general partner and limited partner interests in DCP Midstream, LP (DCP LP), and we each held indirect economic interests in DCP LP of 28.26%. DCP LP is a VIE because its limited partners do not have the ability to remove its general partner with a simple majority vote, nor do its limited partners have substantive participating rights in the significant decisions made in the ordinary course of business. DCP Midstream ultimately consolidates DCP LP because one of its wholly owned subsidiaries is the primary beneficiary of DCP LP. We and Enbridge also held 65% and 35% interests, respectively, in Gray Oak Holdings, whose primary asset was a 65% noncontrolling interest in Gray Oak Pipeline, LLC (Gray Oak Pipeline). Our and Enbridge’s indirect economic interests in Gray Oak Pipeline were 42.25% and 22.75%, respectively. We had voting control over and consolidated Gray Oak Holdings and reported Gray Oak Holdings’ 65% interest in Gray Oak Pipeline as an equity investment and Enbridge’s interest in Gray Oak Holdings as a noncontrolling interest. In connection with the DCP Midstream Merger, we and Enbridge entered into a Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of DCP Midstream (Amended and Restated LLC Agreement), which realigned the members’ economic interests and governance responsibilities. Under the Amended and Restated LLC Agreement, two classes of membership interests in DCP Midstream were created, Class A and Class B, that are intended to track the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the following operating segments of DCP Midstream: • Class A Segment comprised of the businesses, activities, assets and liabilities of DCP LP and its subsidiaries and its general partner entities (DCP Midstream Class A Segment). • Class B Segment comprised of the business, activities, assets and liabilities of Gray Oak Pipeline (DCP Midstream Class B Segment). We hold a 76.64% Class A membership interest, which represents an indirect economic interest in DCP LP of 43.3%, and a 10% Class B membership interest, which represents an indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline of 6.5%. Enbridge holds the remaining Class A and Class B membership interests. We have been designated as the managing member of DCP Midstream Class A Segment and are responsible for conducting, directing and managing all activities associated with this segment, except as limited in certain instances. Enbridge has been designated as the managing member of DCP Midstream Class B Segment. Earnings and distributions from each segment are allocated to the members based on their membership interest in each membership class, except as otherwise provided. DCP Midstream Class A Segment and DCP Midstream Class B Segment were determined to be silos under the variable interest consolidation model. As a result, DCP Midstream was also determined to be a VIE. We determined that we are the primary beneficiary of DCP Midstream Class A Segment because of the governance rights granted to us under the Amended and Restated LLC Agreement as managing member of the segment. We hold a 33.33% direct ownership interest in DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Sand Hills) and DCP Southern Hills Pipeline, LLC (DCP Southern Hills). DCP LP holds the remaining 66.67% ownership interest in these entities. As a result of the governance rights granted to us over DCP Midstream Class A Segment and the governance rights we hold through our direct ownership interests, we obtained controlling financial interests in these entities in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger. As a result of the DCP Midstream Merger, our aggregate direct and indirect economic interests in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills increased from 52.2% to 62.2%. Starting on August 18, 2022, we began consolidating the financial results of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills and reporting the direct and indirect economic interests held by others in these entities as noncontrolling interests on our financial statements. 114 We account for our remaining indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline, now held through DCP Midstream Class B Segment, using the equity method of accounting. As a result of the DCP Midstream Merger, we derecognized Enbridge’s noncontrolling interest in Gray Oak Holdings. We accounted for our consolidation of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. See Note 5—Business Combinations, for additional information regarding our accounting for this transaction. DCP Midstream, LP Merger (DCP LP Merger) On June 15, 2023, we completed the acquisition of all publicly held common units of DCP LP and eliminated the public common unit noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements from the DCP LP Merger date, forward, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 5, 2023 (DCP LP Merger Agreement). The DCP LP Merger Agreement was entered into with DCP LP, its subsidiaries and its general partner entities, pursuant to which one of our wholly owned subsidiaries merged with and into DCP LP, with DCP LP surviving as a Delaware limited partnership. Under the terms of the DCP LP Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the DCP LP Merger, each publicly held common unit representing a limited partner interest in DCP LP (other than the common units owned by DCP Midstream and its subsidiaries) issued and outstanding as of immediately prior to the effective time was converted into the right to receive $41.75 per common unit in cash. We paid $3,796 million in cash consideration to common unitholders, funded with a combination of available cash and debt proceeds. The DCP LP Merger was accounted for as an equity transaction. The DCP LP Merger increased our aggregate direct and indirect economic interest in DCP LP from 43.3% to 86.8% and our aggregate direct and indirect economic interests in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills increased from 62.2% to 91.2%. DCP Midstream Class A Segment DCP Midstream Class A Segment is a VIE and we are the primary beneficiary. DCP Midstream Class A Segment is comprised of the businesses, activities, assets and liabilities of DCP LP and its subsidiaries and its general partner entities. DCP LP is a master limited partnership whose operations currently include producing and fractionating NGL; gathering, compressing, treating and processing natural gas; recovering condensate; and transporting, trading, marketing and storing natural gas and NGL. The most significant assets of DCP Midstream Class A Segment that are available to settle only its obligations, along with its most significant liabilities for which its creditors do not have recourse to Phillips 66’s general credit, were: Millions of Dollars December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 Accounts receivable $ 638 601 Net properties, plants and equipment 8,861 9,319 Investments and long-term receivables 1,622 1,901 Accounts payable 909 815 Short-term debt 532 357 Long-term debt 2,913 3,759 115 Preferred Units On October 16, 2023, DCP LP redeemed its Series C preferred units at the aggregated liquidation preference of $110 million, which approximated the book value of the preferred units. On June 15, 2023, DCP LP redeemed its Series B preferred units at the aggregated liquidation preference of $161 million, which approximated the book value of the preferred units. In December 2022, DCP LP redeemed its Series A preferred units with an aggregate liquidation preference of $500 million, which approximated the book value of the preferred units. These preferred unit redemptions decreased the “Noncontrolling interests” balance on our consolidated balance sheet from December 31, 2022. Trading and Reporting Status In late 2023, DCP LP’s common units, Series B preferred units and Series C preferred units were delisted and deregistered from the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, DCP LP has suspended its reporting obligations to the Securities and Exchange Commission under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Distributions For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, DCP LP made cash distributions of $47 million, $125 million and $51 million, respectively, to common unitholders other than Phillips 66 and its subsidiaries. 116 Note 4—Restructuring Los Angeles Refinery In October 2024, we announced our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025, and are evaluating potential future uses of the property. As a result of this decision, the following impacts were recorded in our Refining segment: • We assessed the Los Angeles Refinery asset group for impairment and concluded that the carrying value of the asset group was recoverable. However, the estimated useful lives of the Los Angeles Refinery assets were shortened to reflect the plan to cease the use of the assets in the fourth quarter of 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the $1,248 million carrying value of the net PP&E and intangible assets will be depreciated through December 2025 to the estimated salvage value of $241 million. Total depreciation related to the Los Angeles Refinery assets for the year ended December 31, 2024, was $350 million, including $253 million of accelerated depreciation. This accelerated depreciation is included within the “Depreciation and amortization” line item on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024. • We increased our asset retirement obligations (AROs) to $231 million as of December 31, 2024, mainly reflecting our change in the estimated timing of spending for asbestos abatement and decommissioning of assets at the Los Angeles Refinery. The asset retirement obligations recorded require significant judgment and are subject to changes in the underlying assumptions. Depreciation of the related capitalized asset retirement costs also will be recorded through December 2025, and the amount for the year ended December 31, 2024, is reflected in the accelerated depreciation discussed above. • We recorded $44 million of severance costs, which are included in the “Operating expenses” line item on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024. In April 2022, we began a multi-year business transformation focused on enterprise-wide opportunities to improve our cost structure. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recorded restructuring costs totaling $177 million and $160 million, respectively, primarily related to consulting fees and severance costs. Restructuring costs for the year ended December 31, 2022, also included an impairment related to assets held for sale. These costs are primarily recorded in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” and “Impairments” line items on our consolidated statement of income and are reported in Corporate and Other. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recorded restructuring costs of $38 million and $18 million, respectively, associated with the integration of DCP Midstream Class A Segment primarily related to severance and contract exit costs. These costs are primarily recorded in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line item on our consolidated statement of income and are reported in our Midstream segment. 117 Note 5—Business Combinations Midstream Acquisitions Acquisition On July 1, 2024, we acquired Pinnacle Midland Parent LLC (Pinnacle Midstream) to expand our natural gas gathering and processing operations in the Permian Basin for cash consideration of $565 million. For this acquisition, we provisionally recorded $325 million of PP&E, including finance lease right of use assets; $256 million of amortizable intangible assets, primarily customer relationships; $21 million of goodwill; $18 million of net working capital deficit; $13 million of AROs; and $6 million of finance lease liabilities. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are preliminary and subject to change until we finalize the accounting for this acquisition. DCP Midstream Merger On August 17, 2022, we realigned our economic interest in, and governance rights over, DCP Midstream and Gray Oak Holdings through the DCP Midstream Merger, with DCP Midstream as the surviving entity. As part of the DCP Midstream Merger, we transferred a 35.75% indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline and contributed $404 million of cash to DCP Midstream, which was then paid to Enbridge, in return for a 15.05% incremental indirect economic ownership interest in DCP LP. As noted above, the additional governance rights we were granted as part of this transaction resulted in us consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, as well as DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. Given the nature of this transaction, we have accounted for the consolidation of these entities using the acquisition method of accounting. The components of the fair value of the DCP Midstream Merger consideration are: Millions of Dollars Cash contributed $ 404 Fair value of transferred equity interest 634 Fair value of previously held equity interests 3,853 Total merger consideration $ 4,891 The aggregate purchase consideration noted above was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of the entities consolidated based upon their estimated fair values as of the DCP Midstream Merger on August 17, 2022. We finalized the valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the three months ended September 30, 2023, prior to the end of the one-year measurement period on August 16, 2023. 118 The following table shows the purchase price allocation as of the date of the DCP Midstream Merger, and cumulative adjustments we made during the one-year measurement period that ended on August 16, 2023: Millions of Dollars Fair value of assets acquired: As Originally Reported Adjustments As Adjusted Cash and cash equivalents $ 98 — 98 Accounts and notes receivable 1,003 — 1,003 Inventories 74 238 312 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 439 13 452 Investments and long-term receivables 2,192 (125) 2,067 Properties, plants and equipment 12,837 193 13,030 Intangibles 36 (36) — Other assets 343 (158) 185 Total assets acquired 17,022 125 17,147 Fair value of liabilities assumed: Accounts payable 912 3 915 Short-term debt 625 (2) 623 Accrued income and other taxes 107 13 120 Employee benefit obligation—current 50 22 72 Other accruals 497 (6) 491 Long-term debt 4,541 40 4,581 Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs 168 16 184 Deferred income taxes 40 14 54 Employee benefit obligations 54 — 54 Other liabilities and deferred credits 227 36 263 Total liabilities assumed 7,221 136 7,357 Fair value of net assets 9,801 (11) 9,790 Less: Fair value of noncontrolling interests 4,910 (11) 4,899 Total merger consideration $ 4,891 — 4,891 The adjustments reflected in the table above include reclassification adjustments we made to the purchase price allocation to conform with our historical presentation and adjustments we made to the estimated fair value of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the measurement period. The adjustments to our purchase price allocation recorded during the measurement period were not material. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, for additional information on the determination of the fair value of the DCP Midstream Merger. In connection with the DCP Midstream Merger, we recognized before-tax gains totaling $2,831 million from remeasuring our previously held equity investments in DCP Midstream, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills to their fair values and a before tax gain of $182 million related to the transfer of a 35.75% indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline to our co-venturer. These before-tax gains are included in the “Other income” line item in our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2022, and are reported in the Midstream segment. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, for additional information on the determination of the fair value of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. 119 The following “Sales and other operating revenues” and “Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66” of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills were included in our consolidated statement of income from August 18, 2022, forward, for the year ended December 31, 2022. Millions of Dollars Sales and other operating revenues $ 4,531 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 216 Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents consolidated results for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2021, as if the DCP Midstream Merger occurred on January 1, 2021. The unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments based on available information, and we believe the estimates and assumptions used are reasonable, and that the significant effects of the transactions are properly reflected in the unaudited pro forma information. An aggregate before-tax gain of $2,831 million was included in the pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2021, which is related to the remeasurement of the previously held equity investments in DCP Midstream, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills to their fair values in connection with the DCP Midstream Merger. Adjustments related to the economic interest change in our equity investment in Gray Oak Pipeline were excluded from the pro forma financial information. The unaudited pro forma financial information presented is for comparative purposes only and does not give effect to any potential synergies that could be achieved and is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations. Year Ended December 31 2022 2021 Sales and other operating revenues (millions) $ 177,127 119,027 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 (millions) 8,847 3,360 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 per share—basic (dollars) 18.74 7.61 Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 per share—diluted (dollars) 18.68 7.60 Pending Midstream Acquisition On January 6, 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all issued and outstanding equity interests in each of EPIC Y-Grade GP, LLC (Y- Grade GP) and EPIC Y-Grade, LP (Y-Grade LP, and, together with Y-Grade GP and their respective subsidiaries, EPIC Y-Grade), which own various long haul natural gas liquids pipelines, fractionation facilities and distribution systems, for cash consideration of $2.2 billion, subject to certain closing adjustments. The closing date of this transaction is dependent on regulatory approval and completion of other customary closing conditions. Marketing and Specialties Acquisitions On October 1, 2024, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast for total consideration of $65 million. These operations were acquired to support the placement of renewable diesel produced by the Rodeo Renewable Energy Complex (Rodeo Complex). For this acquisition, we provisionally recorded $17 million of amortizable intangible assets, primarily customer relationships; $62 million of PP&E, including finance lease right of use assets; $31 million of net working capital; and $45 million of finance lease liabilities. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are preliminary and subject to change until we finalize our accounting for this acquisition. On August 1, 2023, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast for total consideration of $272 million. These operations were acquired to support the placement of renewable diesel produced by the Rodeo Complex. We finalized the valuation of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed during the three months ended June 30, 2024, prior to the end of the one-year measurement period on July 31, 2024. For this acquisition, we recorded $146 million of amortizable intangible assets, primarily customer relationships; $82 million of PP&E, including finance lease right of use assets; $40 million of net working capital; $67 million of goodwill; and $63 million of finance lease liabilities. 120 Note 6—Sales and Other Operating Revenues Disaggregated Revenues The following tables present our disaggregated sales and other operating revenues: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Product Line and Services Refined petroleum products and renewable fuels $ 103,685 108,644 131,798 Crude oil resales 22,008 20,824 20,574 NGL and natural gas 14,548 14,467 16,174 Services and other* 2,912 3,464 1,444 Consolidated sales and other operating revenues $ 143,153 147,399 169,990 Geographic Location** United States $ 113,599 118,786 136,995 United Kingdom 12,713 14,642 16,741 Germany 5,265 5,547 6,392 Other countries 11,576 8,424 9,862 Consolidated sales and other operating revenues $ 143,153 147,399 169,990 * Includes derivatives-related activities. See Note 18—Derivatives and Financial Instruments, for additional information. ** Sales and other operating revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the operations generating the revenues. Contract-Related Assets and Liabilities At December 31, 2024 and 2023, receivables from contracts with customers were $8,615 million and $9,638 million, respectively. Significant noncustomer balances, such as buy/sell receivables and excise tax receivables, were excluded from these amounts. Our contract-related assets also include payments we make to our marketing customers related to incentive programs. An incentive payment is initially recognized as an asset and subsequently amortized as a reduction to revenue over the contract term, which generally ranges from 5 to 15 years. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, our asset balances related to such payments were $643 million and $537 million, respectively. Our contract liabilities primarily represent advances from our customers prior to product or service delivery. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, contract liabilities were $232 million and $187 million, respectively. Remaining Performance Obligations Most of our contracts with customers are spot contracts or term contracts with only variable consideration. We do not disclose remaining performance obligations for these contracts as the expected duration is one year or less or because the variable consideration has been allocated entirely to an unsatisfied performance obligation. We also have certain contracts in our Midstream segment that include minimum volume commitments with fixed pricing. At December 31, 2024, the remaining performance obligations related to these minimum volume commitment contracts amounted to $566 million. This amount excludes variable consideration and estimates of variable rate escalation clauses in our contracts with customers, and is expected to be recognized through 2031 with a weighted average remaining life of three years as of December 31, 2024. 121 Note 7—Credit Losses We are exposed to credit losses primarily through our sales of refined petroleum products, renewable fuels, renewable feedstocks, crude oil, NGL and natural gas. We assess each counterparty’s ability to pay for the products we sell by conducting a credit review. The credit review considers our expected billing exposure and timing for payment and the counterparty’s established credit rating or our assessment of the counterparty’s creditworthiness based on our analysis of their financial statements when a credit rating is not available. We also consider contract terms and conditions, country and political risk, and business strategy in our evaluation. A credit limit is established for each counterparty based on the outcome of this review. We may require collateralized asset support or a prepayment to mitigate credit risk. We monitor our ongoing credit exposure through active review of counterparty balances against contract terms and due dates. Our activities include timely account reconciliations, dispute resolution and payment confirmations. We may employ collection agencies and legal counsel to pursue recovery of defaulted receivables. In addition, when events and circumstances arise that may affect certain counterparties’ abilities to fulfill their obligations, we enhance our credit monitoring, and we may seek collateral to support some transactions or require prepayments from higher-risk counterparties. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, we reported $11,033 million and $11,730 million of accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances of $70 million and $71 million, respectively. Based on an aging analysis at December 31, 2024, more than 95% of our accounts receivable were outstanding less than 60 days. We are also exposed to credit losses from off-balance sheet exposures, such as guarantees of joint venture debt and accounts receivables sold under a securitization facility, as well as standby letters of credit. See Note 15—Debt, Note 16—Guarantees, and Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments, for more information on these off-balance sheet exposures. Note 8—Inventories Inventories at December 31 consisted of the following: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Crude oil and products $ 3,547 3,330 Materials and supplies 448 420 $ 3,995 3,750 Inventories valued on the LIFO basis totaled $3,443 million and $3,050 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The estimated excess of current replacement cost over LIFO cost of inventories amounted to approximately $4.9 billion and $5.3 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. During each of the three years ended December 31, 2024, certain volume reductions in inventory caused liquidations of LIFO inventory values. For the year ended December 31, 2024, LIFO inventory liquidations decreased net income by $10 million. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, LIFO inventory liquidations increased net income by $94 million, and $75 million, respectively. 122 Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables Components of investments and long-term receivables at December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Equity investments $ 14,013 14,728 Other investments 191 195 Loans and long-term receivables 174 379 $ 14,378 15,302 Equity Investments The following table represents our significant investments in unconsolidated affiliates at December 31: At December 31, 2024 Millions of Dollars VIE Ownership Percentage 2024 2023 Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC 50.00 % $ 7,819 7,341 WRB Refining LP 50.00 2,323 2,736 Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC 25.00 776 800 Dakota Access, LLC 25.00 777 538 Front Range Pipeline LLC 33.33 459 477 Rockies Express Pipeline LLC — — 451 CF United LLC 47.09 284 350 OnCue Holdings, LLC X 50.00 185 166 See Note 15—Debt, for additional information regarding the non-cash distribution of WRB Refining LP’s (WRB) Advance Term Loan, which reduced our investment balance by $290 million. Sold as of June 14, 2024. See discussion in Investment Dispositions section below. On January 1, 2024, CF United LLC (CF United) ceased to be a VIE following the completion of the acquisition of another joint venture in which we had an ownership interest. In connection with this acquisition, the governing agreement for CF United was amended and restated. The amended and restated agreement included removal of a put option that required us to purchase our co- venturer’s interest based on a fixed multiple that was considered a variable interest. We fully guarantee various debt agreements of OnCue Holdings, LLC (OnCue), and our co-venturer does not participate in the guarantees. This entity is considered a VIE because our debt guarantees resulted in OnCue not being exposed to all potential losses. We have determined we are not the primary beneficiary because we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact economic performance. At December 31, 2024, our maximum exposure to loss was $245 million, which represented the book value of our investment in OnCue of $185 million and guaranteed debt obligations of $60 million. The following table presents significant basis differences between the carrying value of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates and our share of their underlying equity at December 31: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Excess (deficit) of Carrying Value over (under) Underlying Equity in Unconsolidated Affiliates WRB Refining LP $ (1,526) (1,400) Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC 393 415 Front Range Pipeline LLC 280 292 Rockies Express Pipeline LLC — 261 Sold as of June 14, 2024. See further discussion in “Investment Dispositions” section below. * ** *** **** * ** *** **** * * 123 The basis differences result from the carrying values of our investments being higher or lower than our share of the underlying equity of our unconsolidated affiliates. Carrying amounts in excess of the underlying equity of our unconsolidated affiliates are amortized and recognized as a decrease to equity earnings over the remaining life of the underlying long-lived assets of the affiliate. Carrying amounts that are less than the underlying equity of our unconsolidated affiliates are amortized and recognized as a benefit to equity earnings over the remaining life of the underlying long-lived assets of the affiliate. Dakota Access, LLC (Dakota Access) and Energy Transfer Crude Oil Company, LLC (ETCO) Dakota Access is a 25 percent-owned joint venture that owns a pipeline system transporting crude oil from the Bakken/Three Forks production area in North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois. ETCO is a 25 percent-owned joint venture that owns a connecting crude oil pipeline system that extends from Patoka to Nederland, Texas. These two pipeline systems collectively form the Bakken Pipeline system, which is operated by a co-venturer. In 2020, the trial court presiding over litigation brought by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (the Tribe) ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addressing an easement under Lake Oahe in North Dakota. The trial court later vacated the easement. Although the easement is vacated, the USACE has no plans to stop pipeline operations while it proceeds with the EIS, and the Tribe’s request for a shutdown was denied in May 2021. In June 2021, the trial court dismissed the litigation entirely. Once the EIS is completed, new litigation or challenges may be filed. In February 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court) denied Dakota Access’ writ of certiorari requesting the Supreme Court to review the trial court’s decision to order the EIS and vacate the easement. Therefore, the requirement to prepare the EIS stood. Also in February 2022, the Tribe withdrew as a cooperating agency, causing the USACE to halt the EIS process while the USACE engaged with the Tribe on their reasons for withdrawing. The draft EIS process resumed in August 2022, and in September 2023, the USACE published its draft EIS for public comment. The USACE identified five potential outcomes but did not indicate which one it preferred. The options comprise two “no action” alternatives where the USACE would deny an easement to Dakota Access and require it to shut down the pipeline and either remove the pipe from under Lake Oahe or allow the pipeline to be abandoned-in-place under the lake. The USACE also identified three “action” alternatives; two of them contemplate that the USACE would reissue the easement to Dakota Access under essentially the same terms as 2017 with either the same or a larger volume of oil allowed through the pipeline, while the third alternative would require decommissioning of the current pipeline and construction of a new line 39 miles upstream from the current location. The public comment period concluded on December 13, 2023. The USACE plans to review the comments and issue its final EIS in early 2026. The Record of Decision will follow within 30 to 60 days after the issuance of the final EIS. The final EIS must be completed before the USACE can reauthorize the easement for the pipeline. If reauthorization occurs, new litigation challenging the reauthorization may be filed. In October 2024, the Tribe filed another lawsuit against the USACE in federal district court in Washington, D.C., again challenging USACE’s allowance of pipeline operations while the EIS process proceeds. In this lawsuit, the Tribe purports to introduce new evidence regarding the pipeline’s proximity to a reservoir and attempts to relitigate arguments about the need for injunctive relief to support its position that the Supreme Court should halt pipeline operations. A consortium of 13 states has joined Dakota Access as intervenors. The consortium argues that the pipeline reduces pollution compared to other modes of transportation and that Dakota Access is integral to the health of regional energy and agriculture markets. The Tribe’s prior request for a shutdown was denied in May 2021. This latest lawsuit seeking a shutdown does not change the current deadline for the issuance of the final EIS. Dakota Access and ETCO have guaranteed repayment of senior unsecured notes issued by a wholly owned subsidiary of Dakota Access. On April 1, 2024, Dakota Access’ wholly owned subsidiary repaid $1 billion aggregate principal amount of its outstanding senior notes upon maturity. We funded our 25% share of the repayment, or $250 million, with a capital contribution of $171 million in March 2024 and $79 million of distributions we elected not to receive from Dakota Access in the first quarter of 2024. At December 31, 2024, the aggregate principal amount outstanding of Dakota Access’ senior unsecured notes was $850 million. 124 In addition, Phillips 66 Partners and its co-venturers in Dakota Access also provided a Contingent Equity Contribution Undertaking (CECU) in conjunction with the notes offering. Under the CECU, the co-venturers may be severally required to make proportionate equity contributions to Dakota Access if there is an unfavorable final judgment in the above-mentioned ongoing litigation. At December 31, 2024, our 25% share of the maximum potential equity contributions under the CECU was approximately $215 million. If the pipeline is required to cease operations, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. Should operations cease and Dakota Access and ETCO not have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, we also could be required to support our 25% share of the ongoing expenses, including scheduled interest payments on the notes of approximately $10 million annually, in addition to the potential obligations under the CECU at December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the aggregate book value of our investments in Dakota Access and ETCO was $883 million and $640 million, respectively. Investment Dispositions On December 10, 2024, we sold our equity interests in certain pipeline and terminaling assets in North Dakota for cash proceeds of approximately $143 million and recorded an immaterial before-tax loss on the sale. On August 1, 2024, we sold our ownership interests in certain gathering and processing assets in Louisiana and Alabama for cash proceeds of $173 million and recognized a before-tax gain of $18 million, which is included in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024, and is reported in the Midstream segment. On June 14, 2024, we sold our 25% ownership interest in Rockies Express Pipeline LLC for cash proceeds of $685 million and recognized a before-tax gain of $238 million, which is included in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024, and is reported in the Midstream segment. Subsequent Investment Dispositions On January 30, 2025, we sold our 25% ownership interest in Gulf Coast Express Pipeline LLC for cash proceeds of $853 million. The equity investment balance was $776 million as of December 31, 2024. On January 31, 2025, we sold our 49% ownership interest in Coop Mineraloel AG (Coop). We received cash proceeds of 1.06 billion Swiss francs, consisting of a sales price of approximately 977 million Swiss francs and a final dividend relating to financial year 2024 of 83 million Swiss francs from Coop that was paid on January 30, 2025. We also settled the foreign currency forward contracts entered into in connection with the asset sale, in which we sold 1.06 billion Swiss francs in exchange for $1.24 billion U.S. dollars. We recognized a before-tax unrealized gain of $67 million from the foreign currency forward contracts in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2024, which is reported in our M&S segment. The equity investment balance was $164 million as of December 31, 2024. Related Party Loans We and our co-venturer have from time to time provided member loans to WRB. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, no member loans were outstanding. Equity Affiliate Distributions Total cash distributions received from affiliates were $1,525 million, $1,396 million, and $1,832 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. In addition, at December 31, 2024, retained earnings included approximately $3.7 billion related to the undistributed earnings of affiliated companies. 125 Summarized Equity Affiliate Financial Information Summarized 100% financial information for all affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method, on a combined basis, as of and for the year ended December 31 was: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Revenues $ 42,069 42,078 60,981 Income before income taxes 4,846 5,350 7,616 Net income 4,674 5,160 7,414 Current assets 6,820 6,759 7,511 Noncurrent assets 46,480 46,241 46,527 Current liabilities 6,494 5,750 5,592 Noncurrent liabilities 9,304 10,980 11,412 Noncontrolling interests 2 2 2 Note 10—Properties, Plants and Equipment Our investment in PP&E is recorded at cost. Investments in refining and processing facilities are generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over a 25-year life, pipeline assets over a 45-year life, terminal assets over a 35-year life, and gathering systems over a 35-year life. The company’s investment in PP&E, with the associated accumulated depreciation and amortization (Accum. D&A), at December 31 was: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Gross PP&E Accum. D&A Net PP&E Gross PP&E Accum. D&A Net PP&E Midstream $ 26,187 4,820 21,367 26,124 4,382 21,742 Chemicals — — — — — — Refining 22,274 11,991 10,283 23,110 12,150 10,960 Marketing and Specialties 2,091 1,267 824 1,997 1,166 831 Renewable Fuels 3,716 1,669 2,047 2,311 953 1,358 Corporate and Other 1,688 945 743 1,650 829 821 $ 55,956 20,692 35,264 55,192 19,480 35,712 See Note 4—Restructuring for information regarding our intention to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery. See Note 5—Business Combinations and Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, for additional information on the DCP Midstream Merger, accounting treatment and the associated fair value measurements. See Note 12—Impairments, for information regarding PP&E impairments. On August 30, 2024, we sold certain Midstream gathering and processing assets in Texas for cash proceeds of $41 million and recognized a before-tax loss of $9 million, which is included in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024. In the first quarter of 2024, we transferred $1 billion in gross PP&E and $656 million of accumulated depreciation and amortization from our Refining segment to our Renewable Fuels segment in connection with the conversion of the San Francisco Refinery to the Rodeo Complex and the change in composition of our operating segments recast in the second quarter of 2024. See Note 29—Segment Disclosures and Related Information, for information regarding changes to our operating segments. 126 Note 11—Goodwill and Intangibles The carrying amount of goodwill by segment at December 31 was: Millions of Dollars Midstream Marketing and Specialties Total Balance at December 31, 2022 $ 626 860 1,486 Goodwill assigned to acquisitions — 64 64 Balance at December 31, 2023 626 924 1,550 Goodwill assigned to acquisitions 22 3 25 Balance at December 31, 2024 $ 648 927 1,575 On July 1, 2024, we acquired Pinnacle Midstream in our Midstream segment and recognized goodwill of $21 million associated with this acquisition. In August 2023, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast in our M&S segment and recognized goodwill of $67 million associated with this acquisition. Refer to Note 5—Business Combinations, for additional information. Intangible Assets Intangible Assets with Indefinite Useful Lives The gross carrying value of indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31 consisted of the following: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Trade names and trademarks $ 503 504 Refinery air and operating permits 109 196 $ 612 700 Intangible Assets with Finite Useful Lives The net book value of our amortized intangible assets was $549 million at December 31, 2024, and $220 million at December 31, 2023. These balances include accumulated amortization of $408 million and $234 million, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The amortized intangible assets are primarily related to customer relationships. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, amortization expense was $53 million, $33 million and $27 million, respectively. Expected expenses beyond 2025 are less than $50 million per year. The amortization expenses are expected to be $130 million in 2025, which is primarily related to our plan to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery. The book value of the amortized intangible assets, which were previously considered indefinite-lived, associated with our Los Angeles Refinery was $80 million at December 31, 2024. Refer to Note 4—Restructuring, for additional information regarding our plan to cease operations at our Los Angeles Refinery. On July 1, 2024, we acquired Pinnacle Midstream in our Midstream segment and recorded additions of $256 million in amortizable intangible assets, which have a weighted-average amortization period of 20 years. Also during 2024, we recorded additions of $17 million in amortizable intangible assets associated with the acquisition of a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast in our M&S segment. In August 2023, we acquired a marketing business on the U.S. West Coast in our M&S segment and recorded additions of $146 million in amortizable intangible assets. 127 Note 12—Impairments Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Midstream $ 346 3 1 Refining 106 10 13 Marketing and Specialties 3 3 — Corporate and Other 1 8 46 Total impairments $ 456 24 60 For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recorded before-tax impairments totaling $456 million, which included $346 million recorded in our Midstream segment and $106 million recorded in our Refining segment. Midstream segment impairments included $224 million related to certain gathering and processing assets in Texas, $35 million related to an equity investment in a crude pipeline in Oklahoma, and $28 million related to certain crude gathering assets in Texas. Before-tax impairments for the year ended December 31, 2024 also included $163 million related to certain crude oil processing and logistics assets in California, of which $104 million was reported in our Refining segment and $59 million was reported in our Midstream segment. These impairment charges are included within the “Impairments” line item on our consolidated income statement. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, for additional information on the determination of fair value used to record these impairments. 128 Note 13—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs at December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Asset retirement obligations $ 771 537 Accrued environmental costs 439 446 Total asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs 1,210 983 Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs due within one year* (81) (119) Long-term asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs $ 1,129 864 * Classified as a current liability on the consolidated balance sheet, under the caption “Other accruals.” Asset Retirement Obligations We have asset retirement obligations that we are required to perform under law or contract once an asset is permanently taken out of service. Our recognized asset retirement obligations primarily involve asbestos abatement at our current refineries, or at sites we own that were previously utilized as refineries; decommissioning, removal or dismantlement of certain assets at refineries that have ceased or will cease operations; decommissioning, removal or dismantlement of certain midstream pipelines and processing facilities; and dismantlement or removal of assets at certain leased international marketing sites. Most of our asset retirement obligations are not expected to be paid until many years in the future and are expected to be funded from general company resources at the time of removal. Our overall asset retirement obligation changed as follows during the years ended December 31: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Balance at January 1 $ 537 565 Accretion of discount 27 25 New obligations 261 — Changes in estimates of existing obligations 33 23 Spending on existing obligations (25) (58) Asset dispositions (55) (23) Foreign currency translation (7) 5 Balance at December 31 $ 771 537 During the year ended December 31, 2024, our asset retirement balance increased $234 million. This increase was primarily due to new obligations of $205 million associated with the expected cessation of operations at the Los Angeles Refinery in the fourth quarter of 2025. See Note 4—Restructuring, for additional information. 129 Accrued Environmental Costs Of our total accrued environmental costs at December 31, 2024, $280 million was primarily related to cleanup at current domestic refineries, or at sites we own that were previously utilized as domestic refineries, and underground storage tanks at U.S. service stations; $111 million was associated with non-operated sites; and $48 million was related to sites at which we have been named a potentially responsible party under federal or state laws. A large portion of our expected environmental expenditures have been discounted as these obligations were acquired in various business combinations. Expected expenditures for acquired environmental obligations were discounted using a weighted-average discount rate of approximately 5%. At December 31, 2024, the accrued balance for acquired environmental liabilities was $239 million. The expected future undiscounted payments related to the portion of the accrued environmental costs that have been discounted are: $12 million in 2025, $30 million in 2026, $12 million in 2027, $15 million in 2028, $18 million in 2029, and $219 million in the aggregate for all years after 2029. Note 14—Earnings Per Share The numerator of basic earnings per share (EPS) is net income attributable to Phillips 66, adjusted for noncancelable dividends paid on unvested share- based employee awards during the vesting period (participating securities). The denominator of basic EPS is the sum of the daily weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented and fully vested stock and unit awards that have not yet been issued as common stock. The numerator of diluted EPS is also based on net income attributable to Phillips 66, which is reduced by dividend equivalents paid on participating securities for which the dividends are more dilutive than the participation of the awards in the earnings of the periods presented. To the extent unvested stock, unit or option awards and vested unexercised stock options are dilutive, they are included with the weighted-average common shares outstanding in the denominator. Treasury stock is excluded from the denominator in both basic and diluted EPS. 2024 2023 2022 Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Amounts Attributed to Phillips 66 Common Stockholders (millions): Net Income Attributable to Phillips 66 $ 2,117 2,117 7,015 7,015 11,024 11,024 Income allocated to participating securities (10) (10) (11) — (10) — Net income available to common stockholders $ 2,107 2,107 7,004 7,015 11,014 11,024 Weighted-average common shares outstanding (thousands): 418,607 420,174 448,381 450,136 469,436 471,497 Effect of share-based compensation 1,567 1,714 1,755 3,074 2,061 2,234 Weighted-average common shares outstanding—EPS 420,174 421,888 450,136 453,210 471,497 473,731 Earnings Per Share of Common Stock (dollars) $ 5.01 4.99 15.56 15.48 23.36 23.27 130 Note 15—Debt Short-term and long-term debt at December 31 was: Millions of Dollars December 31, 2024 Phillips 66 Phillips 66 Company Phillips 66 Partners DCP LP Total 3.605% Senior Notes due February 2025 $ — — 59 — 59 5.375% Senior Notes due July 2025 — — — 525 525 1.300% Senior Notes due February 2026 500 — — — 500 3.550% Senior Notes due October 2026 — 458 34 — 492 5.625% Senior Notes due July 2027 — — — 500 500 4.950% Senior Notes due December 2027 — 750 — — 750 3.750% Senior Notes due March 2028 — 427 73 — 500 3.900% Senior Notes due March 2028 800 — — — 800 5.125% Senior Notes due May 2029 — — — 600 600 3.150% Senior Notes due December 2029 — 570 30 — 600 8.125% Senior Notes due August 2030 — — — 300 300 2.150% Senior Notes due December 2030 850 — — — 850 5.250% Senior Notes due June 2031 — 1,200 — — 1,200 3.250% Senior Notes due February 2032 — — — 400 400 5.300% Senior Notes due June 2033 — 900 — — 900 4.650% Senior Notes due November 2034 1,000 — — — 1,000 4.950% Senior Notes due March 2035 — 600 — — 600 6.450% Senior Notes due November 2036 — — — 300 300 6.750% Senior Notes due September 2037 — — — 450 450 5.875% Senior Notes due May 2042 1,500 — — — 1,500 5.600% Senior Notes due April 2044 — — — 400 400 4.875% Senior Notes due November 2044 1,700 — — — 1,700 4.680% Senior Notes due February 2045 — 442 8 — 450 4.900% Senior Notes due October 2046 — 605 20 — 625 3.300% Senior Notes due March 2052 1,000 — — — 1,000 5.650% Senior Notes due June 2054 — 500 — — 500 5.500% Senior Notes due March 2055 — 600 — — 600 Commercial paper due January 2025 at 4.695% at year-end 2024 435 — — — 435 Uncommitted Facility due July 2025 at 5.300% at year-end 2024 — 400 — — 400 Receivables Securitization Facility due September 2025 at 5.182% at year-end 2024 — 375 — — 375 Floating Rate Term Loan due June 2026 at 5.445% at year-end 2024 — 550 — — 550 Other 1 — — — 1 Debt at face value 7,786 8,377 224 3,475 19,862 Finance leases 352 Software obligations 17 Net unamortized discounts, debt issuance costs and acquisition fair value adjustments (169) Total debt 20,062 Short-term debt (1,831) Long-term debt $ 18,231 131 Millions of Dollars December 31, 2023 Phillips 66 Phillips 66 Company Phillips 66 Partners DCP LP Total 0.900% Senior Notes due February 2024 $ 800 — — — 800 2.450% Senior Notes due December 2024 — 277 23 — 300 3.605% Senior Notes due February 2025 — 441 59 — 500 3.850% Senior Notes due April 2025 650 — — — 650 5.375% Senior Notes due July 2025 — — — 825 825 1.300% Senior Notes due February 2026 500 — — — 500 3.550% Senior Notes due October 2026 — 458 34 — 492 5.625% Senior Notes due July 2027 — — — 500 500 4.950% Senior Notes due December 2027 — 750 — — 750 3.750% Senior Notes due March 2028 — 427 73 — 500 3.900% Senior Notes due March 2028 800 — — — 800 5.125% Senior Notes due May 2029 — — — 600 600 3.150% Senior Notes due December 2029 — 570 30 — 600 8.125% Senior Notes due August 2030 — — — 300 300 2.150% Senior Notes due December 2030 850 — — — 850 3.250% Senior Notes due February 2032 — — — 400 400 5.300% Senior Notes due June 2033 — 500 — — 500 4.650% Senior Notes due November 2034 1,000 — — — 1,000 6.450% Senior Notes due November 2036 — — — 300 300 6.750% Senior Notes due September 2037 — — — 450 450 5.875% Senior Notes due May 2042 1,500 — — — 1,500 5.600% Senior Notes due April 2044 — — — 400 400 4.875% Senior Notes due November 2044 1,700 — — — 1,700 4.680% Senior Notes due February 2045 — 442 8 — 450 4.900% Senior Notes due October 2046 — 605 20 — 625 3.300% Senior Notes due March 2052 1,000 — — — 1,000 Securitization facility due August 2024 — — — 350 350 Floating Rate Term Loan due June 2026 at 6.456% at year-end 2023 — 1,250 — — 1,250 Floating Rate Advance Term Loan due 2035 at 6.096% at year- end 2023—related party 25 — — — 25 Floating Rate Advance Term Loan due 2038 at 6.490% at year- end 2023—related party 265 — — — 265 Revolving Credit Facility due 2027 6.512% at year-end 2023 — — — 25 25 Other 1 — — — 1 Debt at face value 9,091 5,720 247 4,150 19,208 Finance leases 305 Software obligations 13 Net unamortized discounts, debt issuance costs and acquisition fair value adjustments (167) Total debt 19,359 Short-term debt (1,482) Long-term debt $ 17,877 132 Maturities of borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2024, inclusive of net unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs, for each of the years from 2025 through 2029 are $1,831 million, $1,578 million, $1,262 million, $1,331 million and $1,228 million, respectively. Issuances On September 9, 2024, Phillips 66 Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66, issued $1.8 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2031 (Additional 2031 Notes). • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 4.950% Senior Notes due 2035 (2035 Notes). • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.500% Senior Notes due 2055 (2055 Notes). Interest on the Additional 2031 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year and commenced on December 15, 2024. Interest on the 2035 Notes and 2055 Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15, commencing on March 15, 2025. On February 28, 2024, Phillips 66 Company issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $600 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% Senior Notes due 2031 (2031 Notes). • $400 million aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2033 (Additional 2033 Notes). • $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.650% Senior Notes due 2054 (2054 Notes). Interest on the 2031 Notes and 2054 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year and commenced on June 15, 2024. Interest on the Additional 2033 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 30 of each year and commenced on June 30, 2024. On March 29, 2023, Phillips 66 Company issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Phillips 66. The senior unsecured notes issuance consisted of: • $750 million aggregate principal amount of 4.950% Senior Notes due December 2027. • $500 million aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due June 2033. Repayments On December 16, 2024, upon maturity, Phillips 66 Company and Phillips 66 Partners repaid the 2.450% Senior Notes due December 2024 with an aggregate principal amount of $300 million. On March 29, 2024, DCP LP redeemed $300 million of its 5.375% Senior Notes due July 2025. After the redemption, an aggregate principal amount of $525 million remained outstanding. On March 4, 2024, Phillips 66 Company repaid $700 million of the $1.25 billion borrowed under its delayed draw term loan that matures in June 2026. On February 15, 2024, upon maturity, Phillips 66 repaid its 0.900% senior notes due February 2024 with an aggregate principal amount of $800 million. On May 19, 2023, DCP LP redeemed its 5.850% junior subordinated notes due May 2043 with an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $550 million. On the date of redemption, our carrying value of DCP LP’s junior subordinated notes was $497 million, which resulted in a $53 million before-tax loss. DCP LP’s junior subordinated notes were adjusted to fair value on August 17, 2022, in connection with the consolidation of DCP LP. See Note 19—Fair Value Measurements, for additional information regarding the fair value of DCP LP’s junior subordinated notes. On March 15, 2023, DCP LP repaid its 3.875% senior unsecured notes due March 2023 with an aggregate principal amount of $500 million. 133 Discharge of Senior Notes On September 20, 2024, we extinguished (i) the remaining $441 million outstanding principal amount of Phillips 66 Company’s 3.605% senior notes due February 2025 (2025 P66 Co Notes), and (ii) the remaining $650 million outstanding principal amount of Phillips 66’s 3.850% senior notes due April 2025 (the 2025 PSX Notes, and together with the 2025 P66 Co Notes, the Discharged Notes), whereby we irrevocably transferred a total of $1,100 million in government obligations to the trustee of the 2025 P66 Co Notes and the 2025 PSX Notes. The cash paid to purchase the government obligations is included within investing cash flows on our consolidated statement of cash flows. These government obligations will yield sufficient principal and interest over their remaining term to permit the trustee to satisfy the remaining principal and interest due on the Discharged Notes. Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company are no longer the primary obligors under the Discharged Notes. The transfer of the government obligations to the trustee was accounted for as a transfer of financial assets. If the trustee is unable to apply the government obligations to fund the remaining principal and interest payments on the Discharged Notes, then the Company’s obligations under the Indenture with respect to the Discharged Notes will be revived and reinstated. We deem the likelihood of such event to be remote with no impact to the legal isolation of the assets. Accordingly, the senior notes and the government obligations were derecognized on our balance sheet at December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized an immaterial gain on the extinguishment of this debt. Term Loan Agreement On March 27, 2023, Phillips 66 Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66, entered into a $1.5 billion delayed draw term loan agreement guaranteed by Phillips 66 (the Term Loan Agreement). The Term Loan Agreement provides for a single borrowing during a 90-day period commencing on the closing date, which borrowing was contingent upon the completion of the DCP LP Merger. The Term Loan Agreement contains customary covenants similar to those contained in our revolving credit agreement, including a maximum consolidated net debt-to-capitalization ratio of 65% as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Term Loan Agreement has customary events of default, such as nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts after grace periods; and violation of covenants. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. Outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan Agreement bear interest at either: (a) the adjusted term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) in effect from time to time plus the applicable margin; or (b) the reference rate plus the applicable margin, as defined in the Term Loan Agreement. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, $550 million and $1.25 billion were borrowed under the Term Loan Agreement, which matures in June 2026, respectively. Related Party Advance Term Loan Agreements At December 31, 2023, borrowings outstanding under our Advance Term Loan agreements with WRB totaled $290 million. Borrowings under these agreements were due between 2035 and 2038 and bore interest at a floating rate based on an adjusted term SOFR plus an applicable margin, payable on the last day of each month. On December 31, 2024, WRB distributed its Advance Term Loan with a principal balance of $290 million, including the right to receive any accrued but unpaid interest, to Phillips 66 Company, resulting in the reduction of our related party debt balance and our investment in WRB by $290 million. The distribution was recognized as a non-cash investing and financing transaction. Accounts Receivable Securitization On September 30, 2024, Phillips 66 Company entered into a 364-day, $500 million accounts receivable securitization facility (the Receivables Securitization Facility). Under the Receivables Securitization Facility, Phillips 66 Company sells or contributes on an ongoing basis, certain of its receivables, together with related security and interests in the proceeds thereof, to its wholly owned subsidiary, Phillips 66 Receivables LLC (P66 Receivables), a consolidated and bankruptcy-remote special purpose entity created for the sole purpose of transacting under the Receivables Securitization Facility. Under the Receivables Securitization Facility, P66 Receivables may borrow and incur indebtedness from, and/or sell certain receivables in an amount not to exceed $500 million in the aggregate, and will secure its obligations with a pledge of undivided interests in such receivables, together with related security and interests in the proceeds thereof, to PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the secured parties thereunder. Accounts outstanding under the Receivables Securitization Facility accrue interest at an adjusted SOFR plus the applicable margin. In all instances, Phillips 66 Company retains the servicing of the accounts receivables transferred. 134 P66 Receivables’ sole activity consists of purchasing receivables from Phillips 66 Company, providing those receivables as collateral for P66 Receivables’ borrowings or on-selling certain of its receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility. P66 Receivables is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors, who will be entitled, upon its liquidation, to be satisfied out of P66 Receivables’ assets prior to assets or value in P66 Receivables becoming available to P66 Receivables’ equity holders. The assets of P66 Receivables, including any funds of P66 Receivables that may be commingled with funds of any of its affiliates for purposes of cash management and related efficiencies, are not available to pay creditors of Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 or any affiliate thereof. Collections on receivables in excess of amounts owed by P66 Receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility are available to P66 Receivables for payment to Phillips 66 Company, for sales of its receivables to P66 Receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility, and otherwise for distribution to Phillips 66 Company, in each case, subject to the terms set forth in the Receivables Securitization Facility. The amount available for borrowing or sale of receivables may be limited by the availability of eligible receivables and other customary factors and conditions, as well as the covenants set forth in the Receivables Securitization Facility. Sales of accounts receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility meet the sale criteria under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, and are derecognized from the consolidated balance sheet. P66 Receivables guarantees payment, in full, for accounts receivables sold to the purchasers. Cash receipts from the sale of accounts receivables under the Receivables Securitization Facility, received at the time of sale, are classified as cash flows from operating activities. For the year-ended December 31, 2024, we sold $125 million of accounts receivables in exchange for a $125 million reduction in our borrowings under the Receivables Securitization Facility, which was recognized as a non-cash financing transaction. We recognized an immaterial charge associated with the transfer of financial assets, which is included as a component within the line item “Selling, general and administrative expense” on our consolidated statement of income during the year ended December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, $121 million of the sold accounts receivable remained outstanding, which represents our maximum potential future exposure under the guarantee. Borrowings under the Receivables Securitization Facility are recognized as short-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. Borrowings are secured by the accounts receivables, held by P66 Receivables, which remain reported as accounts receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2024, we had outstanding borrowings of $375 million under the Receivables Securitization Facility, secured by approximately $4.6 billion of accounts receivable held by P66 Receivables. At December 31, 2024, we had no unused capacity under the Receivables Securitization Facility. Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper Phillips 66 and Phillips 66 Company On January 13, 2025, we entered into a $200 million uncommitted credit facility (the 2025 Uncommitted Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor. The 2025 Uncommitted Facility contains covenants and events of default customary for unsecured uncommitted facilities. The 2025 Uncommitted Facility has no commitment fees or compensating balance requirements. Outstanding borrowings under the 2025 Uncommitted Facility bear interest at a rate of either (a) the adjusted term SOFR plus the applicable margin, (b) the adjusted daily simple SOFR plus the applicable margin or (c) the base rate, in each case plus the applicable margin. Each borrowing matures six months from the date of such borrowing. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. At February 21, 2025, no amount had been drawn under the 2025 Uncommitted Facility. On June 25, 2024, we entered into a $400 million uncommitted credit facility (the 2024 Uncommitted Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor. The 2024 Uncommitted Facility contains covenants and events of default customary for unsecured uncommitted facilities. The 2024 Uncommitted Facility has no commitment fees or compensating balance requirements. Outstanding borrowings under the 2024 Uncommitted Facility bear interest at a rate of either (a) the adjusted term SOFR, (b) the adjusted daily simple SOFR or (c) the reference rate, in each case plus the applicable margin. Each borrowing matures six months from the date of such borrowing. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. At December 31, 2024, the entire $400 million had been drawn under the 2024 Uncommitted Facility. 135 On February 28, 2024, we entered into a new $5 billion revolving credit agreement (the Facility) with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor and a scheduled maturity date of February 28, 2029. The Facility replaced our previous $5 billion revolving credit facility dated as of June 23, 2022, with Phillips 66 Company as the borrower and Phillips 66 as the guarantor, and the previous revolving credit facility was terminated. The Facility contains customary covenants similar to the previous revolving credit facility, including a maximum consolidated net debt-to-capitalization ratio of 65% as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Facility has customary events of default, such as nonpayment of principal when due; nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts after grace periods; and violation of covenants. We may at any time prepay outstanding borrowings under the Facility, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. We have the option to increase the overall capacity to $6 billion, subject to certain conditions. We also have the option to extend the scheduled maturity of the Facility for up to two additional one-year terms, subject to, among other things, the consent of the lenders holding the majority of the commitments and of each lender extending its commitment. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility bear interest at either: (a) the adjusted term SOFR (as described in the Facility) in effect from time to time plus the applicable margin; or (b) the reference rate (as described in the Facility) plus the applicable margin. The pricing levels for the commitment fee and interest-rate margins are determined based on the ratings in effect for our senior unsecured long-term debt from time to time. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, no amounts were drawn under the Facility or the previous revolving credit facility, respectively. Phillips 66 also has a $5 billion uncommitted commercial paper program for short-term working capital needs that is supported by the Facility. Commercial paper maturities are contractually limited to less than one year. At December 31, 2024, $435 million of commercial paper had been issued under this program. At December 31, 2023, no borrowings were outstanding under this program. DCP Midstream Class A Segment On March 15, 2024, DCP LP terminated its $1.4 billion credit facility and its accounts receivable securitization facility that previously provided for up to $350 million of borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2023, DCP LP had $25 million in borrowings outstanding under its $1.4 billion credit facility and $350 million of borrowings outstanding under its accounts receivable securitization facility, both of which were repaid during the three months ended March 31, 2024. Total Committed Capacity Available At December 31, 2024, and 2023, we had $4.6 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively, of total committed capacity available under the credit facilities described above. 136 Note 16—Guarantees At December 31, 2024, we were liable for certain contingent obligations under various contractual arrangements as described below. We recognize a liability for the fair value of our obligation as a guarantor for newly issued or modified guarantees. Unless the carrying amount of the liability is noted below, we have not recognized a liability either because the guarantees were issued prior to December 31, 2002, or because the fair value of the obligation is immaterial. In addition, unless otherwise stated, we are not currently performing with any significance under the guarantees and expect future performance to be either immaterial or have only a remote chance of occurrence. Lease Residual Value Guarantees Under the operating lease agreement for our headquarters facility in Houston, Texas, we have the option, at the end of the lease term in September 2025, to request to renew the lease, purchase the facility or assist the lessor in marketing it for resale. We have a residual value guarantee associated with the operating lease agreement with a maximum potential future exposure of $514 million at December 31, 2024. We also have residual value guarantees associated with railcar, airplane and truck leases with maximum potential future exposures totaling $175 million. These leases have remaining terms of one to ten years. Guarantees of Joint Venture Obligations In March 2019, Phillips 66 Partners and its co-venturers in Dakota Access provided a CECU in conjunction with a senior unsecured notes offering. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information regarding Dakota Access and the CECU. At December 31, 2024, we also had other guarantees outstanding primarily for our portion of certain joint venture debt, which have remaining terms of up to five years. The maximum potential future exposures under these guarantees were approximately $189 million. Payment would be required if a joint venture defaults on its obligations. Indemnifications Over the years, we have entered into various agreements to sell ownership interests in certain corporations, joint ventures and assets that gave rise to indemnifications. Agreements associated with these sales include indemnifications for taxes, litigation, environmental liabilities, permits and licenses, employee claims, and real estate tenant defaults. The provisions of these indemnifications vary greatly. The majority of these indemnifications are related to environmental issues, which generally have indefinite terms and potentially unlimited exposure. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amount of recorded indemnifications was $125 million and $159 million, respectively. We amortize the indemnification liability over the relevant time period, if one exists, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each type of indemnity. In cases where the indemnification term is indefinite, we will reverse the liability when we have information to support the reversal. Although it is reasonably possible future payments may exceed amounts recorded, due to the nature of the indemnifications, it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, environmental accruals for known contamination of $100 million and $114 million, respectively, were included in the carrying amount of the recorded indemnifications noted above. These environmental accruals were primarily included in the “Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs” line item on our consolidated balance sheet. For additional information about environmental liabilities, see Note 13—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs and Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments. Additionally, P66 Receivables has guaranteed all borrowings and receivables sold under our Receivables Securitization Facility. See Note 15—Debt for information regarding the guarantee under our Receivables Securitization Facility. 137 Indemnification and Release Agreement In 2012, in connection with our separation from ConocoPhillips, we entered into an Indemnification and Release Agreement. This agreement governs the treatment between ConocoPhillips and us of matters relating to indemnification, insurance, litigation responsibility and management, and litigation document sharing and cooperation arising in connection with the separation. Generally, the agreement provides for cross indemnities principally designed to place financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of our business with us and financial responsibility for the obligations and liabilities of ConocoPhillips’ business with ConocoPhillips. The agreement also establishes procedures for handling claims subject to indemnification and related matters. 138 Note 17—Contingencies and Commitments A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims that arose in the ordinary course of business have been filed against us or are subject to indemnifications provided by us. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for financial recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. In the case of income tax-related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is uncertain. See Note 24—Income Taxes, for additional information about income-tax-related contingencies. Other than with respect to the legal matters described herein, based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include contingent liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other potentially responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes. Environmental We are subject to international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we record accruals for environmental liabilities based on management’s best estimates, using information available at the time. We measure estimates and base contingent liabilities on currently available facts, existing technology and presently enacted laws and regulations, taking into account stakeholder and business considerations. When measuring contingent environmental liabilities, we also consider our prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites, other companies’ cleanup experience, and data released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other organizations. We consider unasserted claims in our determination of environmental liabilities, and we accrue them in the period they are both probable and reasonably estimable. Although liability for environmental remediation costs is generally joint and several for federal sites and frequently so for state sites, we are usually only one of many companies alleged to have liability at a particular site. Due to such joint and several liabilities, we could be responsible for all cleanup costs related to any site at which we have been designated as a potentially responsible party. We have been successful to date in sharing cleanup costs with other financially sound companies. Many of the sites for which we are potentially responsible are still under investigation by the EPA or the state agencies concerned. Prior to actual cleanup, those potentially responsible normally assess the site conditions, apportion responsibility and determine the appropriate remediation. In some instances, we may have no liability or may attain a settlement of liability. Where it appears that other potentially responsible parties may be financially unable to bear their proportional share, we consider this inability in estimating our potential liability, and we adjust our accruals accordingly. As a result of various acquisitions in the past, we assumed certain environmental obligations. Some of these environmental obligations are mitigated by indemnifications made by others for our benefit, although some of the indemnifications are subject to dollar and time limits. 139 We are currently participating in environmental assessments and cleanups at numerous federal Superfund and comparable state sites. After an assessment of environmental exposures for cleanup and other costs, we make accruals on an undiscounted basis (except those pertaining to sites acquired in a business combination, which we record on a discounted basis) for planned investigation and remediation activities for sites where it is probable future costs will be incurred and these costs can be reasonably estimated. We have not reduced these accruals for possible insurance recoveries. In the future, we may be involved in additional environmental assessments, cleanups and proceedings. See Note 13—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs, for a summary of our accrued environmental liabilities. Legal Proceedings Our legal organization applies its knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases, employing a litigation management process to manage and monitor the legal proceedings against us. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases and enables the tracking of those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required. Propel Fuels Litigation In late 2017, as part of Phillips 66 Company’s evaluation of various opportunities in the renewable fuels business, Phillips 66 Company engaged with Propel Fuels, Inc. (Propel Fuels), a California company that distributes E85 and other alternative fuels through fueling kiosks. Ultimately, the parties were not able to reach an agreement and negotiations were terminated in August 2018. On February 17, 2022, Propel Fuels filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda (the Propel Court), alleging that Phillips 66 Company misappropriated trade secrets related to Propel Fuels’ renewable fuels business during and after due diligence. On October 16, 2024, a jury returned a verdict against Phillips 66 Company for $604.9 million in compensatory damages and issued a willfulness finding. In 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on motions anticipated to be filed by Propel Fuels seeking exemplary damages and attorneys’ fees. Propel Fuels has asked the Propel Court to grant treble damages and Phillips 66 Company has filed a brief in opposition to that request. Also in 2025, the Propel Court is expected to rule on Phillips 66 Company’s motions for a judgment in its favor as a matter of law, or in the alternative to reduce the jury’s verdict or to grant a new trial. Phillips 66 Company denies any wrongdoing and intends to vigorously defend its position. As a result of the jury verdict, the Company has recorded an accrual of $604.9 million which is included in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line on our consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2024, and is reported in the M&S segment. In addition, the accrued amount is reflected as “Other liabilities and deferred credits” on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024. However, it is reasonably possible that the estimate of the loss could change based on the progression of the case, including the appeals process. Because of the uncertainties associated with ongoing litigation, we are unable to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss that may be attributable to exemplary damages, if any, in excess of the amount accrued. If information were to become available that would allow us to reasonably estimate a range of potential exposure in an amount higher or lower than the amount already accrued, we would adjust our accrued liabilities accordingly. While Phillips 66 Company believes the jury verdict is not legally or factually supported and intends to pursue post- judgment remedies and file an appeal, there can be no assurances that such defense efforts will be successful. To the extent Phillips 66 Company is required to pay exemplary damages, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. Other Contingencies We have contingent liabilities resulting from throughput agreements with pipeline and processing companies not associated with financing arrangements. Under these agreements, we may be required to provide any such company with additional funds through advances and penalties for fees related to throughput capacity not utilized. At December 31, 2024, we had performance obligations secured by letters of credit and bank guarantees of $804 million related to various purchase and other commitments incident to the ordinary conduct of business. 140 Long-Term Throughput Agreements and Take-or-Pay Agreements We have certain throughput agreements and take-or-pay agreements in support of third-party financing arrangements. The agreements typically provide for crude oil transportation to be used in the ordinary course of our business. At December 31, 2024, the estimated aggregate future payments under these agreements were on average $315 million per year for each year from 2025 through 2029 and $369 million in aggregate for all years after 2029. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, total payments under these agreements were $319 million, $319 million and $323 million, respectively. Note 18—Derivatives and Financial Instruments Derivative Instruments We use financial and commodity-based derivative contracts to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, or to capture market opportunities. Because we do not apply hedge accounting for commodity derivative contracts, all realized and unrealized gains and losses from commodity derivative contracts are recognized in our consolidated statement of income. Gains and losses from derivative contracts held for trading not directly related to our physical business are reported net in the “Other income” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Unrealized gains on the foreign currency derivative entered into in connection with the sale of our 49% ownership interest in Coop are reported in the “Net gain on dispositions” line item on our consolidated statement of income. Cash flows from all our derivative activity for the periods presented appear in the operating section on our consolidated statement of cash flows. Purchase and sales contracts with firm minimum notional volumes for commodities that are readily convertible to cash are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as derivatives unless the contracts are eligible for, and we elect, the normal purchases and normal sales exception, whereby the contracts are recorded on an accrual basis. We generally apply the normal purchases and normal sales exception to eligible crude oil, refined petroleum product, NGL, natural gas, renewable feedstocks, and power commodity contracts to purchase or sell quantities we expect to use or sell in the normal course of business. All other derivative instruments are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. For further information on the fair value of derivatives, see Note 19—Fair Value Measurements. Commodity Derivative Contracts—We sell into or receive supply from the worldwide crude oil, refined petroleum product, NGL, natural gas, renewable feedstocks and renewable fuels, and electric power markets, exposing our revenues, purchases, cost of operating activities and cash flows to fluctuations in the prices for these commodities. Generally, our policy is to remain exposed to the market prices of commodities; however, we use futures, forwards, swaps and options in various markets to balance physical systems, meet customer needs, manage price exposures on specific transactions, and do a limited amount of trading not directly related to our physical business, all of which may reduce our exposure to fluctuations in market prices. We also use the market knowledge gained from these activities to capture market opportunities such as moving physical commodities to more profitable locations, storing commodities to capture seasonal or time premiums, and blending commodities to capture quality upgrades. 141 The following table indicates the consolidated balance sheet line items that include the fair values of commodity derivative assets and liabilities. The balances in the following table are presented on a gross basis, before the effects of counterparty and collateral netting. However, we have elected to present our commodity derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty on a net basis on our consolidated balance sheet when the legal right of offset exists. Millions of Dollars December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 Commodity Derivatives Effect of Collateral Netting Net Carrying Value Presented on the Balance Sheet Commodity Derivatives Effect of Collateral Netting Net Carrying Value Presented on the Balance Sheet Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 1,021 (922) — 99 2,148 (2,005) — 143 Other assets — — — — 19 (2) — 17 Liabilities Other accruals 1,136 (1,226) 46 (44) 1,034 (1,127) 18 (75) Other liabilities and deferred credits 60 (71) 16 5 — (14) — (14) Total $ 2,217 (2,219) 62 60 3,201 (3,148) 18 71 At December 31, 2024, and 2023, there was no material cash collateral received or paid that was not offset on our consolidated balance sheet. The realized and unrealized gains (losses) incurred from commodity derivatives, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated statement of income, were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Sales and other operating revenues $ 35 137 (128) Other income 48 99 79 Purchased crude oil and products (5) (269) (348) Net gain (loss) from commodity derivative activity $ 78 (33) (397) The following table summarizes our material net exposures resulting from outstanding commodity derivative contracts. These financial and physical derivative contracts are primarily used to manage price exposure on our underlying operations. The underlying exposures may be from nonderivative positions such as inventory volumes. Financial derivative contracts may also offset physical derivative contracts, such as forward purchase and sales contracts. The percentage of our derivative contract volumes expiring within the next 12 months was more than 90% at December 31, 2024 and 2023. Open Position Long / (Short) 2024 2023 Commodity Crude oil, refined petroleum products, NGL and renewable feedstocks (millions of barrels) (22) (22) Natural gas (billions of cubic feet) (14) (25) 142 Credit Risk from Derivative and Financial Instruments Financial instruments potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables and derivative contracts. Our trade receivables result primarily from the sale of products from, or related to, our refinery operations and reflect a broad national and international customer base, which limits our exposure to concentrations of credit risk. The majority of these receivables have payment terms of 30 days or less. We continually monitor this exposure and the creditworthiness of the counterparties and recognize bad debt expense based on a probability assessment of credit loss. Generally, we do not require collateral to limit the exposure to loss; however, we will sometimes use letters of credit, prepayments or master netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk with counterparties that both buy from and sell to us, as these agreements permit the amounts owed by us to others to be offset against amounts owed to us. The credit risk from our derivative contracts, such as forwards and swaps, derives from the counterparty to the transaction. Individual counterparty exposure is managed within predetermined credit limits and includes the use of cash-call margins when appropriate, thereby reducing the risk of significant nonperformance. We also use futures, swaps and option contracts that have a negligible credit risk because these trades are cleared with an exchange clearinghouse and subject to mandatory margin requirements, typically on a daily basis, until settled. Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to post collateral if the derivative exposure exceeds a threshold amount. We have contracts with fixed threshold amounts and other contracts with variable threshold amounts that are contingent on our credit ratings. The variable threshold amounts typically decline for lower credit ratings, while both the variable and fixed threshold amounts typically revert to zero if our credit ratings fall below investment grade. Cash is the primary collateral in all contracts; however, many contracts also permit us to post letters of credit as collateral. The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position were immaterial at December 31, 2024 and 2023. 143 Note 19—Fair Value Measurements Recurring Fair Value Measurements We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value, which we measure at the reporting date using the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price), and disclose the quality of these fair values based on the valuation inputs used in these measurements under the following hierarchy: • Level 1: Fair value measured with unadjusted quoted prices from an active market for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2: Fair value measured either with: (1) adjusted quoted prices from an active market for similar assets or liabilities; or (2) other valuation inputs that are directly or indirectly observable. • Level 3: Fair value measured with unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement. We classify the fair value of an asset or liability based on the significance of its observable or unobservable inputs to the measurement. However, the fair value of an asset or liability initially reported as Level 3 will be subsequently reported as Level 2 if the unobservable inputs become inconsequential to its measurement or corroborating market data becomes available. Conversely, an asset or liability initially reported as Level 2 will be subsequently reported as Level 3 if corroborating market data becomes unavailable. We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments: • Cash and cash equivalents—The carrying amount reported on our consolidated balance sheet approximates fair value. • Accounts and notes receivable—The carrying amount reported on our consolidated balance sheet approximates fair value. • Derivative instruments—The fair value of our exchange-traded contracts is based on quoted market prices obtained from the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Intercontinental Exchange or other exchanges, and is reported as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. When exchange- cleared contracts lack sufficient liquidity, or are valued using either adjusted exchange-provided prices or nonexchange quotes, we classify those contracts as Level 2 or Level 3 based on the degree to which inputs are observable. Physical commodity forward purchase and sales contracts and over-the-counter (OTC) financial swaps are generally valued using forward quotes provided by brokers and price index developers, such as Platts and Oil Price Information Service. We corroborate these quotes with market data and classify the resulting fair values as Level 2. When forward market prices are not available, we estimate fair value using the forward price of a similar commodity, adjusted for the difference in quality or location. In certain less liquid markets or for longer-term contracts, forward prices are not as readily available. In these circumstances, physical commodity purchase and sales contracts and OTC swaps are valued using internally developed methodologies that consider historical relationships among various commodities that result in management’s best estimate of fair value. We classify these contracts as Level 3. Physical and OTC commodity options are valued using industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. The degree to which these inputs are observable in the forward markets determines whether the options are classified as Level 2 or 3. We use a midmarket pricing convention (the midpoint between bid and ask prices). When appropriate, valuations are adjusted to reflect credit considerations, generally based on available market evidence. When applicable, we determine the fair value of interest rate swaps based on observable market valuations for interest rate swaps that have notional amounts, terms and pay and reset frequencies similar to ours. When applicable, we determine the fair value of foreign currency derivatives based on observable market data and classify the resulting fair values as Level 2. • Rabbi trust assets—These deferred compensation investments are measured at fair value using unadjusted quoted prices available from national securities exchanges and are therefore categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. 144 • Investment in NOVONIX—At December 31, 2024, our investment in NOVONIX was 13.75%, which is measured at fair value using unadjusted quoted prices available from the Australian Securities Exchange and is therefore categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. • Other investments—Includes other marketable securities with observable market prices. • Debt—The carrying amount of our floating-rate debt approximates fair value. The fair value of our fixed-rate debt is estimated primarily based on observable market prices. The following tables display the fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities either accounted for or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. These values are determined by treating each contract as the fundamental unit of account; therefore, derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are shown on a gross basis in the hierarchy sections of these tables, before the effects of counterparty and collateral netting. The following tables also reflect the effect of netting derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty for which we have the legal right of offset and collateral netting. The carrying values and fair values by hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities, either carried or disclosed at fair value, including any effects of counterparty and collateral netting, were: Millions of Dollars December 31, 2024 Fair Value Hierarchy Total Fair Value of Gross Assets & Liabilities Effect of Counterparty Netting Effect of Collateral Netting Difference in Carrying Value and Fair Value Net Carrying Value Presented on the Balance Sheet Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Commodity Derivative Assets Exchange-cleared instruments $ 2,137 — — 2,137 (2,111) — — 26 OTC instruments — 7 — 7 — — — 7 Physical forward contracts — 70 3 73 (7) — — 66 Rabbi trust assets 153 — — 153 N/A N/A — 153 Investment in NOVONIX 36 — — 36 N/A N/A — 36 Foreign currency derivative — 67 — 67 N/A N/A — 67 $ 2,326 144 3 2,473 (2,118) — — 355 Commodity Derivative Liabilities Exchange-cleared instruments $ 2,173 — — 2,173 (2,111) (62) — — Physical forward contracts — 45 1 46 (7) — — 39 Floating-rate debt — 1,760 — 1,760 N/A N/A — 1,760 Fixed-rate debt, excluding finance leases and software obligations — 16,913 — 16,913 N/A N/A 1,020 17,933 $ 2,173 18,718 1 20,892 (2,118) (62) 1,020 19,732 145 Millions of Dollars December 31, 2023 Fair Value Hierarchy Total Fair Value of Gross Assets & Liabilities Effect of Counterparty Netting Effect of Collateral Netting Difference in Carrying Value and Fair Value Net Carrying Value Presented on the Balance Sheet Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Commodity Derivative Assets Exchange-cleared instruments $ 3,075 54 — 3,129 (3,039) — — 90 OTC instruments — 1 — 1 — — — 1 Physical forward contracts — 70 1 71 (2) — — 69 Rabbi trust assets 155 — — 155 N/A N/A — 155 Investment in NOVONIX 39 — — 39 N/A N/A — 39 $ 3,269 125 1 3,395 (3,041) — — 354 Commodity Derivative Liabilities Exchange-cleared instruments $ 3,057 41 — 3,098 (3,039) (18) — 41 Physical forward contracts — 50 — 50 (2) — — 48 Floating-rate debt — 1,915 — 1,915 N/A N/A — 1,915 Fixed-rate debt, excluding finance leases and software obligations — 16,718 — 16,718 N/A N/A 408 17,126 $ 3,057 18,724 — 21,781 (3,041) (18) 408 19,130 The rabbi trust assets and investment in NOVONIX are recorded in the “Investments and long-term receivables” line item, the foreign currency derivative is recorded in the “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” line item, and floating-rate and fixed-rate debt are recorded in the “Short-term debt” and “Long-term debt” line items on our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 18—Derivatives and Financial Instruments, for information regarding where the assets and liabilities related to our commodity derivatives are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. 146 Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements Equity Investments and PP&E In the fourth quarter of 2024, we remeasured the carrying value of an equity method investment in a crude pipeline in Oklahoma to fair value. Fair value was determined using an income approach. The valuation resulted in a Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurement. In the second and third quarters of 2024, we remeasured the carrying value of the net PP&E and equity method investment in certain crude gathering, and gathering and processing asset groups in Texas to fair value. Fair value was determined using a market approach. These valuations resulted in Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements. In the first quarter of 2024, we remeasured the carrying value of the net PP&E of certain crude oil processing and logistics assets in California to fair value. Fair value was determined using a market approach. These valuations resulted in Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements. See Note 12—Impairments, for additional information regarding before-tax impairments recorded in 2024. DCP Midstream Merger On August 17, 2022, we and Enbridge agreed to merge DCP Midstream and Gray Oak Holdings with DCP Midstream as the surviving entity. As a result, we began consolidating the financial results of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills, and accordingly, accounted for the business combination using the acquisition method of accounting, which required DCP Midstream Class A Segment’s, DCP Sand Hills’ and DCP Southern Hills’, assets and liabilities to be recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date on our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 5 —Business Combinations, for additional information on the DCP Midstream Merger. Equity Method Investments The fair value of the investments we acquired that are accounted for under the equity method was $2,034 million. The fair value of these assets was determined using the income approach. The income approach used discounted cash flow models that require various observable and non-observable inputs, such as margins, tariffs and rates, utilization, volumes, product costs, operating expenses, capital expenditures, terminal-year values and risk- adjusted discount rates. These valuations resulted in Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements. PP&E The fair value of PP&E was $13,030 million. The fair value of these assets was determined primarily using the cost approach. The cost approach used assumptions for the current replacement costs of similar plant and equipment assets adjusted for estimated physical deterioration, functional obsolescence and economic obsolescence. The fair value of properties was determined using a sales comparison approach. These valuations resulted in Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements. Debt The fair value of DCP LP’s senior and junior subordinated notes was measured using a market approach, based on the average of quotes for the acquired debt from major financial institutions. These valuations resulted in Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurements. Noncontrolling Interests As a result of our consolidation of DCP Midstream Class A Segment, the noncontrolling interests held in DCP Midstream Class A Segment were recorded at their fair values on the DCP Midstream Merger date. These noncontrolling interests on the DCP Midstream Merger date primarily included Enbridge’s indirect economic interest in DCP LP, the public holders of DCP LP’s common units and the public holders of DCP LP’s preferred units. The fair value of the noncontrolling interests in DCP LP’s common units was based on their unit market price as of the date of the DCP Midstream Merger, August 17, 2022. The fair value of the noncontrolling interests in DCP LP’s publicly traded preferred units was based on their respective market price as of the date of the DCP Midstream Merger, August 17, 2022. These valuations resulted in Level 1 nonrecurring fair value measurements. The fair value of the noncontrolling interests in DCP LP’s other preferred units was based on an income approach that used projected distributions that were discounted using an average implied yield of DCP LP’s publicly traded preferred units and expected redemption dates. This valuation resulted in a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement. 147 Gains Related to DCP Midstream Merger In connection with the DCP Midstream Merger, we recognized before-tax gains totaling $2,831 million from remeasuring our previously held equity investments to their fair values and a before-tax gain of $182 million related to the transfer of a 35.75% indirect economic interest in Gray Oak Pipeline to our co-venturer. The fair values of our previously held equity interest in DCP Midstream and the equity interest in Gray Oak Pipeline we transferred were primarily based on DCP LP’s publicly traded common unit market price on the effective date of the DCP Midstream Merger, August 17, 2022, the cash consideration contributed and obligations that were deemed to be effectively settled. This valuation resulted in Level 1 nonrecurring fair value measurements. The fair values of our previously held equity interests in DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills were determined using the income approach. The income approach used discounted cash flow models that require various observable and non-observable inputs, such as tariffs, volumes, operating expenses, capital expenditures, terminal-year values and risk-adjusted discount rates. These valuations resulted in Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements. 148 Note 20—Equity Preferred Stock Phillips 66 has 500 million shares of preferred stock authorized, with a par value of $0.01 per share, none of which have been issued. Treasury Stock On October 25, 2023, our Board of Directors approved a $5 billion increase to our share repurchase authorization. Since the inception of our share repurchase program in 2012, our Board of Directors has authorized an aggregate of $25 billion of repurchases of our outstanding common stock, and we have repurchased 238 million shares at an aggregate cost of $21.5 billion. In 2024, we repurchased 24.2 million shares at an aggregate cost of $3.4 billion. Our share repurchase authorizations do not expire. Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on various factors including our share price, results of operations, financial condition and cash required for future business plans. Shares of stock repurchased are held as treasury shares. Our Board of Directors separately authorized two transactions in 2014 and 2018, which resulted in the repurchase of 52.4 million shares of Phillips 66 common stock with an aggregate value of $4.6 billion. In March 2022, in connection with the Phillips 66 Partners merger, we issued 41.8 million shares of common stock from our treasury stock with an aggregate cost of $3.4 billion. See Note 30—Phillips 66 Partners LP, for information on the merger with Phillips 66 Partners. Common Stock Dividends On February 12, 2025, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $1.15 per common share, payable March 5, 2025, to holders of record at the close of business on February 24, 2025. Noncontrolling Interests At December 31, 2024 and 2023, our noncontrolling interests primarily represented Enbridge’s indirect economic interest in DCP LP. On June 15, 2023, as part of the DCP LP Merger, we acquired all publicly held common units of DCP LP and eliminated the public common unit noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements from the DCP LP Merger date, forward. See Note 3—DCP Midstream, LLC and DCP Midstream, LP Mergers, for further information on the DCP LP Merger and preferred unit redemptions. 149 Note 21—Leases We lease marine vessels, pipelines, storage tanks, railcars, service station sites, office buildings, corporate aircraft, land and other facilities and equipment. In determining whether an agreement contains a lease, we consider our ability to control the asset and whether third-party participation or vendor substitution rights limit our control. Certain leases include escalation clauses for adjusting rental payments to reflect changes in price indices, as well as renewal options and/or options to purchase the leased property. Renewal options have been included only when reasonably certain of exercise. There are no significant restrictions imposed on us in our lease agreements with regards to dividend payments, asset dispositions or borrowing ability. Certain leases have residual value guarantees, which may require additional payments at the end of the lease term if future fair values decline below contractual lease balances. We discount lease obligations using our incremental borrowing rate. We separate costs for lease and service components for contracts involving marine vessels, consignment service stations, and refining processing equipment. For these contracts, we allocate the consideration payable between the lease and service components using the relative standalone prices of each component. For contracts involving all other asset types, we account for the lease and service components on a combined basis. For short-term leases, which are leases that, at the commencement date, have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that is reasonably certain to be exercised, we do not recognize the right-of-use (ROU) asset and corresponding lease liability on our consolidated balance sheet. The following table indicates the consolidated balance sheet line items that include the ROU assets and lease liabilities for our finance and operating leases at December 31: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Finance Leases Operating Leases Finance Leases Operating Leases Right-of-Use Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ — 20 — — Net properties, plants and equipment 323 — 298 — Other assets — 1,300 — 1,116 Total right-of-use assets $ 323 1,320 298 1,116 Lease Liabilities Short-term debt $ 30 — 25 — Other accruals — 421 — 362 Long-term debt 322 — 280 — Other liabilities and deferred credits — 934 — 790 Total lease liabilities $ 352 1,355 305 1,152 150 Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2024, for finance and operating lease liabilities were: Millions of Dollars Finance Leases Operating Leases 2025 $ 44 476 2026 46 342 2027 37 254 2028 38 175 2029 34 101 Remaining years 284 178 Future minimum lease payments 483 1,526 Amount representing interest or discounts (131) (171) Total lease liabilities $ 352 1,355 Our finance lease liabilities relate primarily to our marketing business, service station consignment agreements with a marketing joint venture, and a crude oil terminal in the United Kingdom. The lease liability for the terminal finance lease is subject to foreign currency translation adjustments each reporting period. Components of net lease cost for the years ended December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Finance lease cost Amortization of right-of-use assets $ 33 30 24 Interest on lease liabilities 13 9 9 Total finance lease cost 46 39 33 Operating lease cost 478 390 387 Short-term lease cost 88 76 63 Variable lease cost 53 55 19 Sublease income (19) (12) (13) Total net lease cost $ 646 548 489 Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of our lease liabilities for the years ended December 31 was: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Operating cash outflows—finance leases $ 13 15 11 Operating cash outflows—operating leases 473 390 392 Financing cash outflows—finance leases 28 19 32 During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we recorded noncash ROU assets and corresponding operating lease liabilities totaling $547 million, $398 million and $269 million, respectively, related to new and modified lease agreements. 151 The weighted-average remaining lease terms and discount rates for our lease liabilities at December 31 were: 2024 2023 Weighted-average remaining lease term—finance leases (years) 13.0 13.4 Weighted-average remaining lease term—operating leases (years) 4.9 4.9 Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases 4.4 % 3.9 Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases 4.8 4.5 Note 22—Pension and Postretirement Plans The following table provides a reconciliation of the projected benefit obligations and plan assets for our pension plans and accumulated benefit obligations for our other postretirement benefit plans: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Change in Benefit Obligations Benefit obligations at January 1 $ 2,260 752 2,209 675 150 156 Service cost 116 14 108 13 3 3 Interest cost 114 32 118 31 7 8 Plan participant contributions — 3 — 2 7 7 Actuarial loss (gain) 68 (48) 58 30 (8) 2 Benefits paid (209) (34) (233) (33) (22) (26) Foreign currency exchange rate change — (22) — 34 — — Benefit obligations at December 31 $ 2,349 697 2,260 752 137 150 Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at January 1 $ 2,139 778 1,778 707 — — Actual return on plan assets 172 14 203 44 — — Company contributions 19 5 391 20 15 19 Plan participant contributions — 3 — 2 7 7 Benefits paid (209) (34) (233) (33) (22) (26) Foreign currency exchange rate change — (15) — 38 — — Fair value of plan assets at December 31 $ 2,121 751 2,139 778 — — Funded Status at December 31 $ (228) 54 (121) 26 (137) (150) 152 Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans at December 31 include: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Noncurrent assets $ — 181 — 157 — — Current liabilities (60) — (55) — (15) (20) Noncurrent liabilities (168) (127) (66) (131) (122) (130) Total recognized $ (228) 54 (121) 26 (137) (150) Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31 were the following before-tax amounts that had not been recognized in net periodic benefit cost: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain) $ 141 (16) 111 2 (54) (51) Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss): Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Sources of Change in Other Comprehensive Income Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period $ (49) 18 20 (26) 8 (2) Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain) and settlements 19 — 28 (3) (5) (6) Total recognized in other comprehensive income $ (30) 18 48 (29) 3 (8) The accumulated benefit obligations for all U.S. and international pension plans were $2,218 million and $609 million, respectively, at December 31, 2024, and $2,101 million and $661 million, respectively, at December 31, 2023. 153 Information for U.S. and international pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31 was: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Accumulated benefit obligations $ 100 134 101 136 Fair value of plan assets — 13 — 13 Information for U.S. and international pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at December 31 was: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Projected benefit obligations $ 2,349 139 2,260 144 Fair value of plan assets 2,121 13 2,139 13 Components of net periodic benefit cost for all defined benefit plans are presented in the table below: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2022 2024 2023 2022 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost Service cost $ 116 14 108 13 123 28 3 3 4 Interest cost 114 32 118 31 100 21 7 8 5 Expected return on plan assets (153) (45) (126) (43) (135) (56) — — — Amortization of prior service credit — — — — — (1) — — (2) Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain) 12 — 11 (3) 21 12 (5) (6) (2) Settlement losses 7 — 17 — 53 9 — — — Net periodic benefit cost (credit)* $ 96 1 128 (2) 162 13 5 5 5 * Included in the “Operating expenses” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line items on our consolidated statement of income. 154 In determining net periodic benefit cost, we amortize prior service costs on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. For net actuarial gains and losses, we amortize 10% of the unamortized balance each year. The amount subject to amortization is determined on a plan-by-plan basis. The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs for years ended December 31: Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2024 2023 2024 2023 U.S. Int’l. U.S. Int’l. Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations: Discount rate 5.75 % 4.99 5.35 4.36 5.70 5.45 Rate of compensation increase 4.25 3.74 4.30 3.34 — — Interest crediting rate on cash balance plan 4.88 — 3.98 — — — Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost: Discount rate 5.35 % 4.36 5.70 4.64 5.45 5.70 Expected return on plan assets 7.50 5.86 7.50 5.91 — — Rate of compensation increase 4.30 3.34 4.30 3.32 — — Interest crediting rate on cash balance plan 3.98 — 3.88 — — — For both U.S. and international pension plans, the overall expected long-term rate of return is developed from the expected future return of each asset class, weighted by the expected allocation of pension assets to that asset class. We rely on a variety of independent market forecasts in developing the expected rate of return for each class of assets. For the year ended December 31, 2024, actuarial losses resulted in increases in our U.S. pension benefit obligations of $68 million and actuarial gains resulted in a decrease in our international pension benefit obligation of $48 million. For the year ended December 31, 2023, actuarial losses resulted in increases in our U.S. and international pension benefit obligations of $58 million and $30 million, respectively. The primary driver for the actuarial losses in 2024 was changes in demographic experience. The primary driver for the actuarial gains in 2024 was increases in the discount rates. The primary driver for the actuarial losses in 2023 was decreases in the discount rates. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the weighted-average actual return on plan assets was 7%, which resulted in an increase in our U.S. and international plan assets of $172 million and $14 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the weighted-average actual return on plan assets was 10%, which resulted in an increase in our U.S. and international plan assets of $203 million and $44 million, respectively. The primary driver of the return on plan assets in 2024 and 2023 was fluctuations in the equity and fixed income markets. Our other postretirement benefit plans for health insurance are contributory. Effective December 31, 2012, we terminated the subsidy for retiree medical plans. Since January 1, 2013, eligible employees have been able to utilize notional amounts credited to an account during their period of service with the company to pay all, or a portion, of their cost to participate in postretirement health insurance. In general, employees hired after December 31, 2012, will not receive credits to an account, but will have unsubsidized access to health insurance through the plan. The cost of health insurance will be adjusted annually by the company’s actuary to reflect actual experience and expected health care cost trends. The measurement of the accumulated benefit obligation assumes a health care cost trend rate of 6.75% in 2025 that declines to 5% by 2032. 155 Plan Assets The investment strategy for managing pension plan assets is to seek a reasonable rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk and provide adequate liquidity for benefit payments and portfolio management. We follow a policy of diversifying pension plan assets across asset classes, investment managers, and individual holdings. As a result, our plan assets have no significant concentrations of credit risk. Asset classes that are considered appropriate include equities, fixed income, cash, real estate and infrastructure investments and insurance contracts. Plan fiduciaries may consider and add other asset classes to the investment program from time to time. The target allocations for plan assets are approximately 44% equity securities, 34% debt securities, 10% real estate investments and 12% in all other types of investments as of December 31, 2024. Generally, the investments in the plans are publicly traded, therefore minimizing the liquidity risk in the portfolio. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the pension plan assets. • Fair values of equity securities and government debt securities are based on quoted market prices. • Fair values of corporate debt securities are estimated using recently executed transactions and market price quotations. If there have been no market transactions in a particular fixed income security, its fair value is calculated by pricing models that benchmark the security against other securities with actual market prices. • Fair values of cash and cash equivalents approximate their carrying amounts. • Fair values of insurance contracts are valued at the present value of the future benefit payments owed by the insurance company to the plans’ participants. • Fair values of investments in common/collective trusts (CCT) and real estate and infrastructure investments, which include a CCT, limited partnerships, and other real estate funds, are valued at the net asset value (NAV) as a practical expedient. The NAV is based on the underlying net assets owned by the fund and the relative interest of each participating investor in the fair value of the underlying assets. These investments valued at NAV are not classified within the fair value hierarchy, but are presented in the fair value table to permit reconciliation of total plan assets to the amounts presented in the fair value table. The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, by asset class, were: Millions of Dollars U.S. International Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 2024 Equity securities $ 298 — — 298 — — — — Government debt securities 330 — — 330 — — — — Corporate debt securities — 109 — 109 — — — — Cash and cash equivalents 28 — — 28 21 — — 21 Insurance contracts — — — — — — 190 190 Total assets in the fair value hierarchy 656 109 — 765 21 — 190 211 Common/collective trusts measured at NAV 1,079 419 Real estate and infrastructure investments measured at NAV 277 121 Total $ 656 109 — 2,121 21 — 190 751 156 Millions of Dollars U.S. International Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 2023 Equity securities $ 295 — — 295 — — — — Government debt securities 388 — — 388 — — — — Corporate debt securities — 101 — 101 — — — — Cash and cash equivalents 31 — — 31 4 — — 4 Insurance contracts — — — — — — 13 13 Total assets in the fair value hierarchy 714 101 — 815 4 — 13 17 Common/collective trusts measured at NAV 1,013 636 Real estate and infrastructure investments measured at NAV 311 125 Total $ 714 101 — 2,139 4 — 13 778 The following table is a reconciliation of the changes in our Level 3 plan asset balance: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Balance at January 1 $ 13 13 Transfer in 186 — Actual return on plan assets (6) — Foreign currency exchange rate change (3) — Balance at December 31 $ 190 13 Our funding policy for U.S. plans is to contribute at least the minimum required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Contributions to international plans are subject to local laws and tax regulations. Actual contribution amounts are dependent upon plan asset returns, changes in pension obligations, regulatory environments, and other economic factors. In 2025, we expect to contribute approximately $75 million to our U.S. pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans and $5 million to our international pension plans. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid to plan participants in the years indicated: Millions of Dollars Pension Benefits Other Benefits U.S. Int’l. 2025 $ 266 26 16 2026 224 28 16 2027 227 29 15 2028 225 33 15 2029 231 34 15 2030-2034 1,168 183 69 157 Defined Contribution Plans Most U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the Phillips 66 Savings Plan (Savings Plan). Employees can contribute up to 75% of their eligible pay, subject to certain statutory limits, in the Savings Plan to a choice of investment funds. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, Phillips 66 provided a company match of participant contributions up to 8% of eligible pay. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, Phillips 66 provided an additional Success Share contribution ranging from 0% to 4% of eligible pay based on management discretion. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we recorded expense of $155 million, $196 million and $210 million, respectively, related to our contributions to the Savings Plan. 158 Note 23—Share-Based Compensation Plans Share-based payment awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards (including restricted stock and Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) awards), cash awards, and performance awards, are granted to our employees, nonemployee directors and other plan participants by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (HRCC) of our Board of Directors under the applicable Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66. Prior to May 11, 2022, share-based payment awards were granted under the 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66 (the 2013 P66 Omnibus Plan). On May 11, 2022, Phillips 66’s shareholders approved the 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66 (the 2022 P66 Omnibus Plan), which replaced the 2013 P66 Omnibus Plan. No future awards will be made under the 2013 P66 Omnibus Plan. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 12 million shares of Phillips 66’s common stock remained available to be issued to settle share-based payment awards under the 2022 P66 Omnibus Plan. Total share-based compensation expense recognized in income and the associated income tax benefit for the years ended December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Restricted stock units $ 121 130 101 Performance share units 83 139 68 Stock options 4 19 17 Other 2 9 24 Total share-based compensation expense $ 210 297 210 Income tax benefit $ (84) (87) (55) 159 Restricted Stock Units Generally, RSUs are granted annually under the provisions of the applicable Phillips 66 incentive plan, and vest either ratably over three years following the grant date or cliff vest at the end of three years for awards granted in 2024 and 2023. For awards granted prior to 2023, RSUs cliff vest at the end of three years. The grant date fair value is equal to the average of the high and low market price of our stock on the grant date. The recipients receive a quarterly dividend equivalent cash payment until the RSU is settled by issuing one share of our common stock for each RSU at the end of the service period. RSUs granted to retirement-eligible employees are not subject to forfeiture ten months after the grant date for RSUs granted in 2024 and 2023, and six months after the grant date for RSUs granted prior to 2023. Special RSUs are granted to attract or retain key personnel and the terms and conditions may vary by award. The following table summarizes our RSU activity from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024: Millions of Dollars Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Total Fair Value Outstanding at January 1, 2024 3,532,083 $ 89.80 Granted 873,735 145.65 Forfeited (95,752) 117.15 Issued (1,448,659) 83.34 $ 206 Outstanding at December 31, 2024 2,861,407 $ 109.20 Not Vested at December 31, 2024 1,945,190 $ 109.41 At December 31, 2024, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost from unvested RSU awards was $88 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 19 months, the longest period being 34 months. During 2023 and 2022, we granted RSUs with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $100.39 and $88.16, respectively. During 2023 and 2022, we issued shares with an aggregate fair value of $126 million and $102 million, respectively, to settle RSUs. Performance Share Units Under the applicable Phillips 66 incentive plan, senior management is annually awarded restricted performance share units (PSUs) with three-year performance periods. These awards vest when the HRCC approves the three-year performance results, which represents the grant date. Retirement- eligible employees may retain a prorated share of the award if they retire prior to the grant date. PSUs are classified as liability awards and compensation expense is recognized over the three-year performance periods. PSUs granted under the applicable Phillips 66 incentive plan are settled by cash payments equal to the fair value of the awards, which is based on the market prices of our stock near the end of the performance periods. The HRCC must approve the three-year performance results prior to payout. Dividend equivalents are not paid on these awards. PSUs granted under prior incentive compensation plans were classified as equity awards. These equity awards are settled upon an employee’s retirement by issuing one share of our common stock for each PSU held. Dividend equivalents are paid on these awards. 160 The following table summarizes our PSU activity from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024: Millions of Dollars Performance Share Units Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Total Fair Value Outstanding at January 1, 2024 534,261 $ 37.57 Granted 1,007,525 130.22 Forfeited — — Issued (102,168) 36.83 $ 14 Cash settled (1,007,525) 130.22 131 Outstanding at December 31, 2024 432,093 $ 37.75 At December 31, 2024, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation cost from unvested PSU awards. During 2023 and 2022, we granted PSUs with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $102.66 and $71.82, respectively. During 2023 and 2022, we issued shares with an aggregate fair value of $13 million and $9 million, respectively, to settle PSUs. During 2023 and 2022, we cash settled PSUs with an aggregate fair value of $36 million and $18 million, respectively. Stock Options Stock options granted under the provisions of the applicable Phillips 66 incentive plan and earlier plans permit purchases of our common stock at exercise prices equivalent to the average of the high and low market price of our stock on the date the options were granted. The options have terms of 10 years and vest ratably over three years following the grant date, with one-third of the options becoming exercisable each year on the grant date anniversary. Options granted to retirement-eligible employees are not subject to forfeiture ten months after the grant date for options granted in 2023 and six months after the grant date for options granted prior to 2023. No options were granted in 2024. The following table summarizes our stock option activity from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024: Millions of Dollars Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Aggregate Intrinsic Value Outstanding at January 1, 2024 5,117,914 $ 87.89 Granted — — $ — Forfeited (10,201) 97.05 Exercised (1,051,247) 82.26 $ 68 Outstanding at December 31, 2024 4,056,466 $ 89.32 Vested at December 31, 2024 3,915,693 $ 88.93 $ 171 Exercisable at December 31, 2024 3,220,753 $ 87.62 $ 147 161 The weighted-average remaining contractual terms of vested options and exercisable options at December 31, 2024, were 5.75 and 5.35 years, respectively. During 2024, we received $86 million in cash and realized an income tax benefit of $16 million from the exercise of options. At December 31, 2024, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense from unvested options was $2 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 13 months, the longest period being 18 months. During 2023 and 2022, we granted options with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $27.45 and $17.02, respectively. During 2023 and 2022, employees exercised options with an aggregate intrinsic value of $52 million and $42 million, respectively. The following table provides the significant assumptions used to calculate the grant-date fair values of options granted in 2023 and 2022, as calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model: 2023 2022 Risk-free interest rate 3.84 % 1.97 Dividend yield 3.80 % 5.10 Volatility factor 35.19 % 33.67 Expected life (years) 6.78 6.61 No options were granted in 2024. We calculate the volatility factor using historical Phillips 66 end-of-week closing stock prices. We periodically calculate the average period of time elapsed between grant dates and exercise dates of past grants to estimate the expected life of new option grants. Other As a result of the DCP Midstream Merger, we began consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment starting on August 18, 2022. DCP Midstream Class A Segment had a Long-Term Incentive Plan under which phantom units, performance units and distribution equivalent rights were awarded to key employees. On June 15, 2023, DCP Midstream Class A Segment’s share-based payment awards were converted to Phillips 66 share-based payment awards and are included in the share-based payment award tables above. Share-based compensation expense recognized for DCP Midstream Class A Segment’s share-based payment awards totaled $23 million for the period from August 18, 2022, through December 31, 2022, and $6 million for the period from January 1, 2023, through June 14, 2023. See Note 4—Restructuring and Note 5—Business Combinations, for additional information regarding the DCP Midstream Merger and associated accounting treatment. 162 Note 24—Income Taxes Components of income tax expense (benefit) were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Federal Current $ 662 661 1,263 Deferred (282) 830 1,171 Foreign Current 78 394 492 Deferred 95 (23) (109) State and local Current 11 335 173 Deferred (64) 33 258 $ 500 2,230 3,248 On August 16, 2022, the U.S. government enacted the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) that includes, among other provisions, changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system, including a 15% minimum tax based on adjusted financial statement income as defined in the IRA, which was effective after December 31, 2022. We did not owe corporate alternative minimum tax in 2024 or 2023 as the regular U.S. tax liability exceeded the corporate alternative minimum tax. The IRA also included provisions that allow a company to purchase transferable tax credits. In 2024 and 2023, we executed agreements to purchase eligible tax credits for a total of $485 million and $262 million, respectively. In 2024 and 2023, we paid $551 million and $196 million to our counterparties, respectively. These tax credits were used to offset estimated tax payments in 2024 and 2023. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes. Major components of deferred tax liabilities and assets at December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 Deferred Tax Liabilities Properties, plants and equipment, and intangibles $ 3,493 3,320 Investment in joint ventures 1,864 1,979 Investment in subsidiaries 2,511 2,628 Other 318 268 Total deferred tax liabilities 8,186 8,195 Deferred Tax Assets Benefit plan accruals 355 362 Loss and credit carryforwards 162 151 Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs 299 127 Other financial accruals and deferrals 91 68 Inventory 82 34 Other 299 274 Total deferred tax assets 1,288 1,016 Less: valuation allowance 137 121 Net deferred tax assets 1,151 895 Net deferred tax liabilities $ 7,035 7,300 163 At December 31, 2024, the loss and credit carryforward deferred tax assets were primarily related to a foreign tax credit carryforward in the United States of $128 million; a state tax net operating loss carryforward of $26 million; and capital loss and net operating loss carryforwards in the United Kingdom of $9 million. State net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2040. Foreign tax credit carryforwards, which have a full valuation allowance against them, begin to expire in 2029. The other loss and credit carryforwards, all of which relate to foreign operations, and have a full valuation allowance against them, have indefinite lives. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized. During the year ended December 31, 2024, our total valuation allowance balance increased by $16 million. Based on our historical taxable income, expectations for the future and available tax planning strategies, management expects the remaining net deferred tax assets will be realized as offsets to reversing deferred tax liabilities and the tax consequences of future taxable income. Earnings of our foreign subsidiaries and foreign joint ventures after December 31, 2017, are generally not subject to incremental income taxes in the United States or withholding taxes in foreign countries upon repatriation. As such, we only assert that the earnings of one of our foreign subsidiaries are indefinitely reinvested. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the unrecorded deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings of this foreign subsidiary was not material. A deferred income tax liability has not been recognized on the excess of the book basis over the tax basis of an investment in a controlled foreign subsidiary that is essentially permanent in duration. Recognition of a deferred tax liability will only be required if it becomes apparent that this subsidiary will be sold or liquidated in the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2024, the temporary difference resulting from the investment book basis exceeding the tax basis was $1,745 million. Determination of the unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to this temporary difference is not practicable given the variables involved in performing such a calculation. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our ownership interest in Coop. In connection with the anticipated sale, we recorded a U.S. deferred tax liability of $36 million for the excess of book over tax basis in this investment. The sale of Coop closed in January 2025. See Note 9—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information. We file tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many foreign and state jurisdictions. Unrecognized tax benefits reflect the difference between positions taken on income tax returns and the amounts recognized in the financial statements. The following table is a reconciliation of the changes in our unrecognized income tax benefits balance: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Balance at January 1 $ 116 54 54 Additions for tax positions of current year — — 1 Additions for tax positions of prior years — 66 2 Reductions for tax positions of prior years (28) (4) (3) Balance at December 31 $ 88 116 54 Included in the balance of unrecognized income tax benefits at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, were $87 million, $100 million and $37 million, respectively, which, if recognized, would affect our effective income tax rate. With respect to various unrecognized income tax benefits and the related accrued liabilities, we do not expect any to be recognized or paid within the next twelve months. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, accrued liabilities for interest and penalties, net of accrued income taxes, totaled $1 million, $8 million and $7 million, respectively. These accruals increased our results for the year ended December 31, 2024, by $7 million and decreased our results for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, by $1 million and $3 million, respectively. 164 Audits in significant jurisdictions are generally complete as follows: United Kingdom (2022), Germany (2017) and United States (2020). Certain issues remain in dispute for audited years, and unrecognized income tax benefits for years still subject to or currently undergoing an audit are subject to change. As a consequence, the balance in unrecognized income tax benefits can be expected to fluctuate from period to period. Although it is reasonably possible such changes could be significant when compared with our total unrecognized income tax benefits, the amount of change is not estimable. The amounts of U.S. and foreign income before income taxes, with a reconciliation of income tax at the federal statutory rate to the recorded income tax expense (benefit), were: Millions of Dollars Percentage of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes 2024 2023 2022 2024 2023 2022 Income before income taxes United States $ 1,796 7,887 12,628 67.1 % 83.3 86.3 Foreign 879 1,582 2,011 32.9 16.7 13.7 $ 2,675 9,469 14,639 100.0 % 100.0 100.0 Federal statutory income tax $ 562 1,989 3,074 21.0 % 21.0 21.0 State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit (43) 290 341 (1.6) 3.1 2.3 Noncontrolling interests (2) (51) (74) (0.1) (0.5) (0.5) Non-taxable equity earnings (44) (42) (33) (1.6) (0.4) (0.2) Tax law changes — — (25) — — (0.2) Discount on purchased credits (36) (15) (4) (1.3) (0.2) — Tax on outside basis difference in foreign investment 36 — — 1.3 — — Other* 27 59 (31) 1.0 0.6 (0.2) $ 500 2,230 3,248 18.7 % 23.6 22.2 * “Other” is primarily attributable to foreign operations. For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, income tax benefits of $14 million, $113 million and $323 million, respectively, are reflected in “Capital in Excess of Par” on the consolidated statement of changes in equity. 165 Note 25—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows: Millions of Dollars Defined Benefit Plans Foreign Currency Translation Hedging Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss December 31, 2021 $ (398) (45) (2) (445) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 204 (291) — (87) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss Defined benefit plans* Amortization of net actuarial loss, prior service credit and settlements 72 — — 72 Foreign currency translation — — — — Hedging — — — — Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) 276 (291) — (15) December 31, 2022 (122) (336) (2) (460) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (12) 179 (3) 164 Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss Defined benefit plans* Amortization of net actuarial loss, prior service credit and settlements 14 — — 14 Foreign currency translation — — — — Hedging — — — — Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) 2 179 (3) 178 December 31, 2023 (120) (157) (5) (282) Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (31) (105) — (136) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss Defined benefit plans* Amortization of net actuarial loss and settlements 11 — — 11 Foreign currency translation — — — — Hedging — — — — Net current period other comprehensive loss (20) (105) — (125) December 31, 2024 $ (140) (262) (5) (407) * Included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 22—Pension and Postretirement Plans, for additional information. 166 Note 26—Cash Flow Information In the third quarter of 2024, we began presenting the line item “Capital expenditures and investments” on our consolidated statement of cash flows exclusive of acquisitions, net of cash acquired. Prior period information has been reclassified for comparability. Supplemental Cash Flow Information Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Cash Payments (Receipts) Interest $ 901 816 572 Income taxes* 1,186 1,397 2,071 * 2024 and 2023 include $551 million and $196 million of cash paid to counterparties to purchase IRA eligible tax credits. Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Non-cash investing activities Derecognition of government obligations $ 1,100 — — Reduction of WRB investment balance 290 — — Non-cash financing activities Derecognition of Discharged Notes $ (1,100) — — Distribution of Advance Term Loan from WRB (290) — — See Note 15—Debt, for additional information regarding the above non-cash activities. 167 Note 27—Other Financial Information Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Interest and Debt Expense Incurred Debt $ 919 842 611 Other 9 86 41 928 928 652 Capitalized (21) (31) (33) Expensed $ 907 897 619 Other Income Interest income $ 158 269 82 Unrealized investment gain (loss)—NOVONIX — (38) (433) Gain related to merger of businesses — — 3,013 Other, net* 85 128 75 $ 243 359 2,737 * Includes derivatives-related activities. See Note 18—Derivatives and Financial Instruments, for additional information. Research and Development Expenses $ 15 27 42 Advertising Expenses $ 51 54 56 Foreign Currency Transaction (Gains) Losses Midstream $ — — — Chemicals — — — Refining — 19 (7) Marketing and Specialties 3 2 (2) Renewable Fuels 2 3 (8) Corporate and Other 6 (2) 8 $ 11 22 (9) 168 Note 28—Related Party Transactions Significant transactions with related parties were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 Operating revenues and other income (a)(d) $ 4,443 4,623 6,111 Purchases (b)(d) 20,620 17,208 21,244 Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses (c) 299 295 281 (a) We sold NGL, other petrochemical feedstocks and solvents to Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC (CPChem), NGL and certain feedstocks to DCP Midstream, gas oil and hydrogen feedstocks to Excel Paralubes LLC (Excel Paralubes), and refined petroleum products to several of our equity affiliates in the M&S segment, including OnCue and CF United. We also sold certain feedstocks and intermediate products to WRB and acted as an agent for WRB in supplying crude oil and other feedstocks for a fee. In addition, we charged several of our equity affiliates, including CPChem, for the use of common facilities, such as steam generators, waste and water treaters and warehouse facilities. (b) We purchased crude oil, refined petroleum products, NGL and solvents from WRB. We also purchased natural gas and NGL from DCP Midstream and CPChem, as well as other feedstocks from various equity affiliates, for use in our refinery and fractionation processes. In addition, we purchased base oils and fuel products from Excel Paralubes for use in our specialty and refining businesses. We paid NGL fractionation fees to CPChem. We also paid fees to various pipeline equity affiliates for transporting crude oil, refined petroleum products and NGL. (c) We paid consignment fees to CF United, and utility and processing fees to various equity affiliates. (d) As a result of the DCP Midstream Merger, we began consolidating DCP Midstream Class A Segment, DCP Sand Hills and DCP Southern Hills. As such, transactions with these parties after August 17, 2022, are not presented in the table above. Note 29—Segment Disclosures and Related Information Effective April 1, 2024, we changed the internal financial information reviewed by our chief executive officer to evaluate performance and allocate resources to our operating segments. This resulted in changes to the composition of our operating segments, as well as measurement changes for certain activities between our operating segments. The primary effects are summarized below. Prior period information has been recast for comparability. • Establishment of a Renewable Fuels operating segment, which includes renewable fuels activities and assets historically reported in our Refining, M&S and Midstream operating segments. • Change in method of allocating results for certain Gulf Coast distillate export activities from our M&S operating segment to our Refining operating segment. • Reclassification of certain crude oil and international clean products trading activities between our M&S operating segment and our Refining operating segment. • Change in reporting of our investment in NOVONIX from our Midstream operating segment to Corporate and Other. 169 Our operating segments are: 1) Midstream—Provides crude oil and refined petroleum product transportation, terminaling and processing services, as well as natural gas and NGL transportation, storage, fractionation, gathering, processing and marketing services in the United States. In addition, this segment exports liquefied petroleum gas to global markets. 2) Chemicals—Consists of our 50% equity investment in CPChem, which manufactures and markets petrochemicals and plastics on a worldwide basis. 3) Refining—Refines crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, such as gasoline and distillates, including aviation fuels. This segment includes 11 refineries in the United States and Europe. 4) Marketing and Specialties—Purchases for resale and markets refined products, mainly in the United States and Europe. In addition, this segment includes the manufacturing and marketing of base oils and lubricants. 5) Renewable Fuels—Processes renewable feedstocks into renewable products at the Rodeo Complex and at our Humber Refinery. In addition, this segment includes the global activities to procure renewable feedstocks, manage certain regulatory credits, and market renewable fuels. Corporate and Other includes general corporate overhead, interest income, interest expense, our investment in research of new technologies, business transformation restructuring costs, our investment in NOVONIX, and various other corporate activities. Corporate assets include all cash, cash equivalents, income tax-related assets and enterprise information technology assets. See Note 4—Restructuring, for additional information regarding restructuring costs. Intersegment sales are at prices that we believe approximate market. Through our implementation of ASU No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280)—Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures,” we are including additional disclosures regarding significant segment expenses regularly provided to our chief operating decision maker (CODM), who is our Chief Executive Officer. The measure of segment profit or loss reviewed by our CODM is “income (loss) before income taxes.” The CODM uses segment income (loss) before income taxes to allocate resources to each segment predominantly in the annual budgeting and forecasting process. The CODM compares budget-to-actual segment income (loss) before income taxes on a monthly and quarterly basis and considers trend analyses as well as other market factors when making decisions about allocating capital and personnel to the segments. The measure of segment assets reported on our consolidated balance sheet reviewed by our CODM is “Total Assets.” 170 Analysis of Results by Operating Segment Millions of Dollars Year Ended December 31, 2024 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Consolidating Adjustments Total Consolidated Revenues and Other Income Third-party sales and other operating revenues $ 16,012 — 34,793 90,318 1,995 35 — 143,153 Intercompany revenues 2,775 — 50,171 2,129 3,567 15 (58,657) — Total sales and other operating revenues 18,787 — 84,964 92,447 5,562 50 (58,657) 143,153 Equity in earnings of affiliates 591 863 50 276 (1) — — 1,779 Net gain on dispositions 263 — (8) 66 — — — 321 Other income 11 — 3 42 10 186 (9) 243 Total Revenues and Other Income 19,652 863 85,009 92,831 5,571 236 (58,666) 145,496 Costs and Expenses Purchased crude oil and products 13,429 — 79,850 89,572 5,664 — (58,553) 129,962 Operating expenses* 1,876 (3) 3,727 70 370 12 (113) 5,939 Selling, general and administrative expenses* 213 (10) 209 1,932 51 419 — 2,814 Depreciation and amortization 920 — 1,077 179 64 123 — 2,363 Impairments 346 — 106 3 — 1 — 456 Taxes other than income taxes 216 — 387 59 (382) 49 — 329 Interest and debt expense — — — — — 907 — 907 Other segment items 14 — 18 5 2 12 — 51 Total Costs and Expenses 17,014 (13) 85,374 91,820 5,769 1,523 (58,666) 142,821 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 2,638 876 (365) 1,011 (198) (1,287) — 2,675 * These significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM. The total of the line items "Operating expenses" and "Selling, general and administrative expenses" is considered "Controllable costs" and is provided to the CODM. ** “Other segment items” for each reportable segment includes the following line items on our consolidated income statement: “Accretion on discounted liabilities” and “Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses.” Millions of Dollars As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2024 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Total Consolidated Interest Income $ — — — — — 158 158 Investments In and Advances to Affiliates 3,080 7,819 2,381 719 16 2 14,017 Total Assets 28,334 7,842 19,599 9,799 3,142 3,866 72,582 Capital Expenditures and Investments 751 — 582 85 375 66 1,859 ** 171 Millions of Dollars Year Ended December 31, 2023 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Consolidating Adjustments Total Consolidated Revenues and Other Income Third-party sales and other operating revenues $ 15,780 — 34,241 95,931 1,412 35 — 147,399 Intercompany revenues 2,824 — 57,985 3,000 3,534 13 (67,356) — Total sales and other operating revenues 18,604 — 92,226 98,931 4,946 48 (67,356) 147,399 Equity in earnings of affiliates 648 586 439 345 (1) — — 2,017 Net gain on dispositions 130 — (13) 3 (3) (2) — 115 Other income 5 — 86 (11) 8 259 12 359 Total Revenues and Other Income 19,387 586 92,738 99,268 4,950 305 (67,344) 149,890 Costs and Expenses Purchased crude oil and products 13,126 — 81,726 95,808 4,667 — (67,241) 128,086 Operating expenses* 1,844 (3) 4,245 57 98 16 (103) 6,154 Selling, general and administrative expenses* 441 (11) 169 1,336 8 582 — 2,525 Depreciation and amortization 923 — 831 122 8 93 — 1,977 Impairments 3 — 10 3 — 8 — 24 Taxes other than income taxes 229 — 382 40 12 44 — 707 Interest and debt expense — — — — — 897 — 897 Other segment items 2 — 35 5 4 5 — 51 Total Costs and Expenses 16,568 (14) 87,398 97,371 4,797 1,645 (67,344) 140,421 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 2,819 600 5,340 1,897 153 (1,340) — 9,469 * These significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM. The total of the line items "Operating expenses" and "Selling, general and administrative expenses" is considered "Controllable costs" and is provided to the CODM. ** “Other segment items” for each reportable segment includes the following line items on our consolidated income statement: “Accretion on discounted liabilities” and “Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses.” Millions of Dollars As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Total Consolidated Interest Income $ — — — — — 269 269 Investments In and Advances to Affiliates 3,749 7,341 2,802 824 18 2 14,736 Total Assets 29,052 7,357 21,013 10,834 2,012 5,233 75,501 Capital Expenditures and Investments 625 — 586 101 753 90 2,155 ** 172 Millions of Dollars Year Ended December 31, 2022 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Consolidating Adjustments Total Consolidated Revenues and Other Income Third-party sales and other operating revenues $ 16,189 — 40,234 112,569 963 35 — 169,990 Intercompany revenues 2,932 — 69,807 2,144 2,475 9 (77,367) — Total sales and other operating revenues 19,121 — 110,041 114,713 3,438 44 (77,367) 169,990 Equity in earnings of affiliates 914 842 747 464 1 — — 2,968 Net gain on dispositions (1) — 1 — — 7 — 7 Other income 3,009 — 43 35 (4) (367) 21 2,737 Total Revenues and Other Income 23,043 842 110,832 115,212 3,435 (316) (77,346) 175,702 Costs and Expenses Purchased crude oil and products 15,496 — 96,808 111,638 3,222 — (77,232) 149,932 Operating expenses* 1,401 (9) 4,731 50 37 15 (114) 6,111 Selling, general and administrative expenses* 255 (5) 151 1,304 5 458 — 2,168 Depreciation and amortization 567 — 860 110 7 85 — 1,629 Impairments 1 — 13 — — 46 — 60 Taxes other than income taxes 146 — 285 38 2 59 — 530 Interest and debt expense — — — — — 619 — 619 Other segment items 1 — 8 — (9) 14 — 14 Total Costs and Expenses 17,867 (14) 102,856 113,140 3,264 1,296 (77,346) 161,063 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 5,176 856 7,976 2,072 171 (1,612) — 14,639 * These significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the CODM. The total of the line items "Operating expenses" and "Selling, general and administrative expenses" is considered "Controllable costs" and is provided to the CODM. ** “Other segment items” for each reportable segment includes the following line items on our consolidated income statement: “Accretion on discounted liabilities” and “Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses.” Millions of Dollars As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2022 Operating Segments Midstream Chemicals Refining M&S Renewable Fuels Corporate and Other Total Consolidated Interest Income $ — — — — — 82 82 Investments In and Advances to Affiliates 4,254 6,785 2,484 881 19 2 14,425 Total Assets 30,179 6,785 21,009 9,812 715 7,942 76,442 Capital Expenditures and Investments 737 — 607 87 323 134 1,888 ** 173 Geographic Information Long-lived assets, defined as net PP&E plus investments and long-term receivables, by geographic location at December 31 were: Millions of Dollars 2024 2023 2022 United States $ 47,889 49,124 48,286 United Kingdom 1,341 1,406 1,349 Germany 325 394 391 Other countries 87 90 87 Worldwide consolidated $ 49,642 51,014 50,113 174 Note 30—Phillips 66 Partners LP On March 9, 2022, we completed a merger between us and Phillips 66 Partners. The merger resulted in the acquisition of all limited partnership interests in Phillips 66 Partners not already owned by us in exchange for 41.8 million shares of Phillips 66 common stock issued from treasury stock. Phillips 66 Partners common unitholders received 0.50 shares of Phillips 66 common stock for each outstanding Phillips 66 Partners common unit. Phillips 66 Partners’ perpetual convertible preferred units were converted into common units at a premium to the original issuance price prior to being exchanged for Phillips 66 common stock. Upon closing, Phillips 66 Partners became a wholly owned subsidiary of Phillips 66 and its common units are no longer publicly traded. The merger was accounted for as an equity transaction. Note 31—New Accounting Standards In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40),” which will require additional disclosure of certain costs and expenses within the notes to the consolidated financial statements. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the provisions of ASU 2024-03 and the incremental disclosures that will be required in our consolidated financial statements. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which enhances the transparency, effectiveness, and comparability of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information related to income tax rate reconciliations and the jurisdictions in which income taxes are paid. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, the provisions of ASU 2023-09 will require additional disclosures within Note 24— Income Taxes, and Note 26—Cash Flow Information. 175 Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of December 31, 2024, with the participation of management, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation, pursuant to Rule 13a- 15(b) of the Act, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively as of December 31, 2024. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act, in the quarterly period ended December 31, 2024, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting This report is included in Item 8 and is incorporated herein by reference. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting This report is included in Item 8 and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, no director or Section 16 officer adopted, modified or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (in each case, as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K). Item 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS Not applicable. 176 PART III Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information regarding our executive officers appears in Part I of this report. We have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (the “Code of Ethics”) that applies to our Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. The Code of Ethics is posted on our website located at http://www.phillips66.com (within the Corporate Governance section) and is available in print upon request. We intend to disclose future amendments to the Code of Ethics, and any waivers of the Code of Ethics, on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver. The remaining information required by Item 10 of Part III is incorporated herein by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement relating to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2024 (the 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement).* Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by Item 11 of Part III is incorporated herein by reference from our 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement.* Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by Item 12 of Part III is incorporated herein by reference from our 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement.* Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by Item 13 of Part III is incorporated herein by reference from our 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement.* Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES The information required by Item 14 of Part III is incorporated herein by reference from our 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement.* _________________________ * Except for information or data specifically incorporated herein by reference under Items 10 through 14, other information and data appearing in our 2025 Definitive Proxy Statement are not deemed to be a part of this Annual Report or deemed to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a part of this report. 177 PART IV Item 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data The financial statements and supplementary information listed in the Index to Financial Statements, which appears on page 95, are filed as part of this Annual Report. 2. Financial Statement Schedules All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required, not significant, not applicable, or the information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. 3. Exhibits The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears on pages 179 to 185, are filed as part of this Annual Report. Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY None. 178 PHILLIPS 66 INDEX TO EXHIBITS Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 2.1 Separation and Distribution Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 8-K 2.1 05/01/2012 001-35349 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 26, 2021, by and among Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 Project Development Inc., Phoenix Sub LLC, Phillips 66 Partners LP, and Phillips 66 Partners GP LLC. 8-K 2.1 10/27/2021 001-35349 2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 5, 2023, by and among Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Project Development Inc., Dynamo Merger Sub LLC, DCP Midstream, LP, DCP Midstream GP, LP and DCP Midstream GP, LLC. 8-K 2.1 01/06/2023 001-35349 2.4 Equity Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2025, by and among P66, SCM EPIC, Dos Rios and Y-Grade Holdings. 8-K 2.1 01/06/2024 001-35349 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Phillips 66. 8-K 3.1 05/01/2012 001-35349 3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws of Phillips 66. 8-K 3.1 12/09/2022 001-35349 4.1 Description of Phillips 66’s Securities. 10-K 4.1 02/21/2020 001-35349 4.2 Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2012, among Phillips 66, as issuer, Phillips 66 Company, as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, in respect of senior debt securities of Phillips 66. 10-12B/A 4.3 04/05/2012 001-35349 4.3 Form of the terms of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2042. 10-12B/A 4.4 04/05/2012 001-35349 4.4 Form of the terms of 4.650% Senior Notes due November 2034. 8-K 4.2 11/17/2014 001-35349 4.5 Form of the terms of 4.875% Senior Notes due November 2044. 8-K 4.2 11/17/2014 001-35349 4.6 Form of the terms of 3.900% Senior Notes due March 2028. 8-K 4.3 03/01/2018 001-35349 4.7 Indenture, dated as of April 9, 2020, among Phillips 66, as issuer, Phillips 66 Company, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, in respect of senior debt securities of Phillips 66. 8-K 4.1 04/09/2020 001-35349 4.8 Form of the terms of 3.850% Senior Notes due 2025. 8-K 4.3 04/09/2020 001-35349 4.9 Form of the terms of 2.150% Senior Notes due 2030. 8-K 4.3 06/10/2020 001-35349 4.10 Form of the terms of 0.900% Senior Notes due 2024. 8-K 4.3 11/18/2020 001-35349 4.11 Form of the terms of 1.300% Senior Notes due 2026. 8-K 4.4 11/18/2020 001-35349 179 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 4.12 Form of the terms of 3.300% Senior Notes due 2052. 8-K 4.2 11/15/2021 001-35349 4.13 Indenture, dated as of May 5, 2022, among Phillips 66 Company, as issuer, Phillips 66, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee, in respect of senior debt securities of Phillips 66 Company. 8-K 4.1 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.14 Form of the terms of the 2025 Notes, including the form of the 2025 Note. 8-K 4.3 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.15 Form of the terms of the 2026 Notes, including the form of the 2026 Note. 8-K 4.4 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.16 Form of the terms of the 2028 Notes, including the form of the 2028 Note. 8-K 4.5 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.17 Form of the terms of the 2029 Notes, including the form of the 2029 Note. 8-K 4.6 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.18 Form of the terms of the 2045 Notes, including the form of the 2045 Note. 8-K 4.7 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.19 Form of the terms of the 2046 Notes, including the form of the 2046 Note. 8-K 4.8 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.20 Form of the terms of the 2027 Notes, including the form of the 2027 Note. 8-K 4.2 03/29/2023 001-35349 4.21 Form of the terms of the 2033 Notes, including the form of the 2033 Note. 8-K 4.3 03/29/2023 001-35349 4.22 Form of the terms of the 2031 Notes, including the form of the 2031 Note. 8-K 4.2 02/28/2024 001-35349 4.23 Form of the terms of the 2054 Notes, including the form of the 2054 Note. 8-K 4.4 02/28/2024 001-35349 4.24 Form of the terms of the 2035 Notes, including the form of the 2035 Note. 8-K 4.3 09/11/2024 001-35349 4.25 Form of the terms of the 2055 Notes, including the form of the 2055 Note. 8-K 4.4 09/11/2024 001-35349 4.26 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2022, among Phillips 66 Company, as issuer, Phillips 66, as guarantor, and Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, as dealer managers. 8-K 4.9 05/05/2022 001-35349 4.27 Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 for the issuance of debt securities between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, any Guarantors party thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.1 09/30/2010 001-32678 4.28 Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 14, 2012 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream Partners, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.1 06/14/2012 001-32678 180 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 4.29 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 14, 2013 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream Partners, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 03/14/2013 001-32678 4.30 Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 13, 2014 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream Partners, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 03/14/2014 001-32678 4.31 Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 17, 2018 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 07/17/2018 001-32678 4.32 Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 10, 2019 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 05/10/2019 001-32678 4.33 Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 24, 2020 to Indenture dated as of September 30, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 06/24/2020 001-32678 4.34 Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 19, 2021 to Indenture dated as of September 20, 2010 between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, as issuer, DCP Midstream, LP, as guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. 8-K 4.3 11/19/2021 001-32678 4.35 Indenture, dated as of August 16, 2000, by and between Duke Energy Field Services, LLC and The Chase Manhattan Bank. 8-K 4.1 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.36 First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 16, 2000, by and between Duke Energy Field Services, LLC and The Chase Manhattan Bank. 8-K 4.1 08/16/2000 000-31095 4.37 Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2006, by and between Duke Energy Field Services, LLC and The Bank of New York (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank). 8-K 4.3 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.38 Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 17, 2007, by and between DCP Midstream, LLC (formerly known as Duke Energy Field Services, LLC) and The Bank of New York (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank). 8-K 4.4 01/06/2017 001-32678 181 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 4.39 Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2017, by and between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, DCP Midstream, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank). 8-K 4.8 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.40 Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2017, by and among DCP Midstream Operating, LP (as successor to DCP Midstream, LLC (formerly known as Duke Energy Field Services, LLC)), DCP Midstream Partners, LP and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank). 8-K 4.9 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.41 Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2013, by and between DCP Midstream Operating, LP (as issuer and successor to DCP Midstream, LLC) and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. 8-K 4.10 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.42 First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 21, 2013, by and between DCP Midstream, LLC and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. 8-K 4.11 01/06/2017 001-32678 4.43 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated January 1, 2017, by and between DCP Midstream Operating, LP, DCP Midstream, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. 8-K 4.12 01/06/2017 001-32678 10.1 Credit Agreement dated as of February 28, 2024, among Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66, as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as administrative agent. 8-K 10.1 02/28/2024 001-35349 10.2 Term Loan Credit Agreement dated as of March 27, 2023, among Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66, as guarantor, the lenders party thereto, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as administrative agent. 8-K 10.1 03/29/2023 001-35349 10.3 Receivables Purchase and Financing Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2024, among Phillips 66 Receivables LLC, the persons from time to time party thereto as purchaser/lenders, PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Phillips 66 Company, as servicer, and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as structuring agent. 8-K 10.1 10/01/2024 001-35349 10.4 Sale and Contribution Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2024, between Phillips 66 Company, as an originator, and Phillips 66 Receivables LLC, as buyer. 8-K 10.2 10/01/2024 001-35349 10.5 Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC, effective as of May 1, 2012. 10-Q 10.14 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.6 First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC, effective as of December 31, 2017. 10-K 10.6 02/23/2018 001-35349 182 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 10.7 Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC, effective as of June 1, 2018. 10-Q 10.1 07/27/2018 001-35349 10.8 Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC. 10-Q 10.1 04/30/2021 001-35349 10.9 Indemnification and Release Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 8-K 10.1 05/01/2012 001-35349 10.10 Intellectual Property Assignment and License Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 8-K 10.2 05/01/2012 001-35349 10.11 Employee Matters Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 8-K 10.4 05/01/2012 001-35349 10.12 Amendment to the Employee Matters Agreement by and between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 10-Q 10.1 05/02/2013 001-35349 10.13 Transition Services Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April 26, 2012. 8-K 10.5 05/01/2012 001-35349 10.14 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** DEF14A App. A 03/27/2013 001-35349 10.15 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** DEF14A App. A 03/31/2022 001-35349 10.16 Phillips 66 Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan.** 10-Q 10.15 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.17 First Amendment to the Phillips 66 Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan.** 10-K 10.18 02/22/2013 001-35349 10.18 Phillips 66 Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan.** 10-Q 10.1 07/29/2016 001-35349 10.19 Phillips 66 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.** 10-Q 10.17 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.20 Phillips 66 Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan-Title I.** 10-Q 10.18 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.21 Phillips 66 Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan-Title II.** 10-Q 10.19 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.22 First Amendment to the Phillips 66 Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan Title II.** 10-K 10.24 02/22/2013 001-35349 10.23 Phillips 66 Defined Contribution Make-Up Plan Title I.** 10-Q 10.20 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.24 Phillips 66 Defined Contribution Make-Up Plan Title II.** 10-K 10.26 02/22/2013 001-35349 10.25 First Amendment to the Phillips 66 Defined Contribution Make-Up Plan Title II.** 10-Q 10.1 04/30/2019 001-35349 183 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 10.26 Phillips 66 Key Employee Change in Control Severance Plan.** 10-K 10.27 02/22/2013 001-35349 10.27 First Amendment to Phillips 66 Key Employee Change in Control Severance Plan, Effective October 2, 2015.** 8-K 10.1 11/08/2013 001-35349 10.28 Annex to the Phillips 66 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Arrangements.** 10-Q 10.23 08/03/2012 001-35349 10.29 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-K 10.31 02/21/2020 001-35349 10.30 Form of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-K 10.32 02/21/2020 001-35349 10.31 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-K 10.33 02/21/2020 001-35349 10.32 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-Q 10.2 05/04/2023 001-35349 10.33 Form of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-Q 10.3 05/04/2023 001-35349 10.34 Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66.** 10-Q 10.4 05/04/2023 001-35349 10.35 Letter Agreement with Vanessa L. Allen Sutherland, dated October 9, 2021.** 10-Q 10.5 05/04/2023 001-35349 10.36 Fifth Amendment to Receivables Financing Agreement, dated July 29, 2022, among DCP Receivables LLC, as borrower, DCP Midstream, LP, as initial servicer, the lenders, LC participants and group agents that are parties thereto from time to time, PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and LC Bank, and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as Structuring Agent. 10-Q 10.1 11/03/2022 001-32678 10.37 Phillips 66 Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan Amendment and Restatement.** 10-K 10.35 02/21/2024 001-32678 10.38 Phillips 66 Defined Contribution Make-Up Plan (Title II) Amendment and Restatement.** 10-K 10.36 02/21/2024 001-32678 10.39 Second Amendment to the Phillips 66 Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan Title II.** 10-K 10.37 02/21/2024 001-32678 10.40 The DCP Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Plan Document.** 10-K 10.38 02/21/2024 001-32678 19* Phillips 66 Insider Trading Policy. 184 Incorporated by Reference Exhibit Number Exhibit Description Form Exhibit Number Filing Date SEC File No. 21* List of Subsidiaries of Phillips 66. 22* List of Guarantor Subsidiaries. 23.1* Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. 23.2* Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. 31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 31.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 32*** Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. 97 Phillips 66 Clawback Policy. 10-K 97 02/21/2024 001-32678 101.INS* Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. 101.SCH* Inline XBRL Schema Document. 101.CAL* Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. 101.LAB* Inline XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. 101.PRE* Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. 101.DEF* Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. 104* Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). * Filed herewith. ** Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements. *** Furnished herewith. 185 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. PHILLIPS 66 Date: February 21, 2025 /s/ Mark E. Lashier Mark E. Lashier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below, as of February 21, 2025, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated. Signature Title /s/ Mark E. Lashier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mark E. Lashier (Principal executive officer) /s/ Kevin J. Mitchell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Kevin J. Mitchell (Principal financial officer) /s/ Ann M. Kluppel Vice President and Controller Ann M. Kluppel (Principal accounting officer) 186 /s/ Gary K. Adams Director Gary K. Adams /s/ Julie L. Bushman Director Julie L. Bushman /s/ Lisa A. Davis Director Lisa A. Davis /s/ Gregory J. Hayes Director Gregory J. Hayes /s/ Charles M. Holley Director Charles M. Holley /s/ John E. Lowe Director John E. Lowe /s/ Robert W. Pease Director Robert W. Pease /s/ Grace Puma Director Grace Puma /s/ Denise L. Ramos Director Denise L. Ramos /s/ Denise R. Singleton Director Denise R. Singleton /s/ Douglas T. Terreson Director Douglas T. Terreson /s/ Glenn F. Tilton Director Glenn F. Tilton /s/ Marna C. Whittington Director Marna C. Whittington 187 Policy Center Insider Trading Policy Owner: Deputy General Counsel, Corporate and Assistant Corporate Secretary Date Revised: January 7, 2025 Approver: General Counsel I. STATEMENT OF POLICY This Policy applies to all employees, officers and directors (collectively “Covered Persons”) of Phillips 66 and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Phillips”) as well as their Family Members and Controlled Entities (as defined in Section II) with respect to trading in securities of Phillips 66. All such securities are referred to in this Policy as “Covered Securities.” Phillips may also determine that other individuals, such as contractors or consultants who have access to material non-public information about Phillips, should be subject to this Policy. Federal and state securities laws prohibit the purchase or sale of a company’s securities by anyone who is aware of material information about that company that is not generally known or available to the public. These laws also prohibit anyone who is aware of material non-public information from disclosing this information to others or recommending the purchase or sale of a company’s securities to others who may trade, whether or not the material information underlying the recommendation is actually disclosed (commonly referred to as “tipping”). Each person subject to this Policy is responsible for understanding and complying with this Policy. It is important that each Covered Person understand the breadth of activities that may constitute illegal insider trading and the consequences. Cases have been successfully prosecuted against trading by employees through foreign accounts, trading by family members and friends, trading involving only a small number of shares, and trading by an employee in securities of another company based on material non-public information he received about his employer. The securities laws do not recognize any mitigating circumstances, and, in any event, even the appearance of an improper transaction should be avoided. Violations of the insider trading laws can result in severe civil and criminal sanctions. Under U.S. securities laws, individuals may be subject to imprisonment for up to 20 years, criminal fines of up to $5 million, and civil fines of up to three times the profit gained or loss avoided. Failure to comply with this Policy may also subject a Covered Person to disciplinary action by Phillips, up to and including termination of employment, whether or not the failure to comply with this Policy results in a violation of law. II. SCOPE This Policy applies to all Covered Persons. The same restrictions that apply to Covered Persons also apply to: Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy • family members who reside with any Covered Person, anyone else who lives in a Covered Person’s household, or any family members who do not live in a Covered Person’s household but whose transactions in Covered Securities are directed by such Covered Person or are subject to such Covered Person’s influence or control, such as parents or children who consult with a Covered Person before they trade in Covered Securities (collectively referred to as “Family Members”); and • entities that a Covered Person or a Family Member control, such as partnerships, corporations and other business entities and trusts for which a Covered Person or a Family Member are the trustee or have a beneficial interest (collectively referred to as “Controlled Entities”). Each Covered Person is ultimately responsible for making sure that any transaction in Covered Securities by any Family Member or Controlled Entity complies with this Policy. Therefore, each Covered Person should make their Family Members aware of the need to confer with such Covered Person before they trade in Covered Securities, and each Covered Person should treat all such transactions and transactions by any Controlled Entities for the purposes of this Policy and applicable securities laws as if the transactions were for their own account. III. REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EVERYONE A. No trading in Covered Securities while aware of material non-public information Covered Persons are prohibited from engaging in transactions in Covered Securities while aware of material non-public information about Phillips. It makes no difference whether a Covered Person relied upon material non-public information in deciding to trade – if they are aware of material non-public information about Phillips, the prohibition applies. Additionally, in the normal course of business, Covered Persons may become aware of material, non-public information about a company with which Phillips does business, such as customers or suppliers of Phillips. Covered Persons must not trade in, take advantage of, or pass information about that company’s securities until the information becomes public or is no longer material. (1) Definition of Material Non-Public Information (i) Material Information Information is “material” if a reasonable investor would consider it important in deciding to buy, hold or sell securities. Any information that could reasonably be expected to affect the price of the security should be considered material. The information may be positive or negative. Common examples of information that may be material include: • annual or quarterly financial results for the entire company or a business segment (or even monthly results under certain circumstances, particularly when they would indicate a material departure from market expectations); • a change in earnings projections; Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 2 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy • unexpected or unusual gains or losses in major operations; • negotiations and agreements regarding acquisitions or divestitures; • significant changes in prices, customers or suppliers; • an increase or decrease in dividends or a new or upsized share repurchase program; • major developments in litigation or regulatory matters; • significant management changes; • change in auditors or notification that the auditor’s reports may no longer be relied upon; • the interruption of operations or other aspects of a company’s business as a result of an accident, fire, natural disaster, breakdown of labor negotiations, or similar circumstances; and • significant cybersecurity incidents. It is not possible to define all categories of material information, and Covered Persons should recognize that hindsight is used in judging what is material. Therefore, it is important to err on the safe side and assume information is material if there is any doubt. Questions regarding specific events should be directed to the Legal Department. (ii) Non-public information Information is “non-public” if it is not generally known or available to the public. Information may still be non-public even though it is widely known within Phillips. Information is considered available to the public two full trading days after it has been released to the marketplace by a method (or combination of methods) of disclosure reasonably designed to provide broad, non- exclusionary distribution of the information to the public, such as: (1) a press release distributed through a widely disseminated news or wire service, (2) a widely disseminated statement from a senior officer or (3) an SEC filing. (2) Securities and Transactions Covered by this Policy The prohibition on engaging in transactions while aware of material non-public information covers virtually all transactions in Covered Securities, including Phillips 66 common stock, options to purchase Phillips 66 common stock, Phillips debt securities, or any other type of securities that Phillips may issue, including (but not limited to) preferred stock, convertible debentures and warrants, as well as derivative securities that are not issued by Phillips, such as exchange-traded put or call options or swaps relating to Phillips securities. Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 3 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy Transactions in Covered Securities include purchases, sales, pledges, hedges, loans and gifts of Covered Securities, as well as other direct or indirect transfers of Covered Securities. Special rules may apply to certain of these transactions, which are addressed in more detail below. Additionally, certain types of transactions are always prohibited by this Policy, regardless of whether a Covered Person is aware of any material non-public information. (3) Application of Policy to Specific Transactions Information regarding some of the most common transactions in Covered Securities is provided below. The information covers whether the transaction is prohibited while a Covered Person is aware of material non-public information. An overview of the restrictions that apply to different transactions can be found in the Appendix A, “Summary of Trading Restrictions on Covered Securities.” (i) Stock Option Exercises The prohibition does apply to sales of stock acquired upon exercise of a stock option and broker- assisted cashless exercises of options, as well as to any other market sales to generate the cash needed to cover the costs of exercise, including tax withholdings. The prohibition does not apply to the exercise of stock options if the exercise price is paid in cash or through Phillips withholding a portion of the shares underlying the options. Similarly, Phillips may withhold underlying shares to satisfy tax withholding requirements. (ii) Vesting of Restricted Stock and Vesting/Settlement of Restricted Stock Units The prohibition does not apply to the vesting, settlement or automatic withholding of shares by Phillips from a Covered Person’s restricted stock account to satisfy tax withholdings upon the vesting or settlement of restricted stock or restricted stock units. The prohibition does apply to any open market sale of shares, including to satisfy tax liabilities. (iii) 401(k) Savings Plans The prohibition does not apply to regular contributions allocated to the purchase of any Covered Securities in the Phillips Savings Plan or other company 401(k) plans (each such plan, a “Savings Plan”); provided, the election to invest in Covered Securities must be made at a time when the Covered Person was not aware of material non-public information. The prohibition does apply to the transfer of account balances into or out of Covered Securities through a Savings Plan; taking out a loan from a Savings Plan that decreases the balance of a Covered Person’s Covered Securities; an election to pre-pay a loan from a Savings Plan if the pre-payment will result in allocation of loan proceeds to the purchase of Covered Securities in a Savings Plan; and any increases or decreases in the amount of contributions allocated to the purchase of Covered Securities. Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 4 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy (iv) Dividend Reinvestments The prohibition does not apply to purchases of Phillips securities through reinvestment of dividends into Phillips securities under the Phillips 66 Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan or through dividend reinvestment features of other plans; provided, the election to reinvest must be made at a time when the Covered Person were not aware of material non-public information. The prohibition does apply to increases or decreases in the amount of dividends reinvested under the plan. The prohibition also applies to any sales of any Phillips securities purchased pursuant to the plan. (v) Direct Stock Purchase Plan The prohibition does apply to purchases or sales of Phillips securities through the Phillips 66 Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan. (vi) Gifts The prohibition does apply to gifts of Covered Securities, including bona fide gifts, donations to charities and non-profit organizations and gifts to related persons. (vii) Mutual Funds The prohibition does not apply to transactions in mutual funds that are invested in Covered Securities as long as (1) the Covered Person or their Family Members or a Controlled Entity does not control the investment decisions on individual stocks within the fund or portfolio and (2) Covered Securities do not represent a substantial portion of the assets of the fund or portfolio. (viii) Certain Transfers The prohibition does not apply to transfers to an entity that do not involve a change in a Covered Person’s beneficial ownership of the Covered Securities (for example, transferring shares from one brokerage account to another brokerage that is controlled by a Covered Person). (4) Transactions Prohibited by this Policy Regardless of Whether A Covered Person Is Aware of Material Non-Public Information Certain transactions can create the appearance of impropriety, even if the person engaging in the transaction is not aware of any material non-public information. Generally, these are transactions that separate the risks and rewards of ownership, transactions that are speculative in nature, and transactions that result in a loss of control over the timing of execution of the purchase or sale. As a result, this Policy always prohibits certain transactions, as detailed below. (i) No short sales of Covered Securities Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 5 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy Covered Persons may not engage in short sales of Covered Securities (sales of securities that are not then owned), including “sales against the box” (short sales not exceeding the number of shares already owned). Generally, short sales are transactions whereby a person will benefit from a decline in the price of the securities. (ii) No trading in derivatives of Covered Securities Covered Persons may not trade in third-party derivatives of a Covered Security, such as exchange-traded put or call options and forward transactions. (iii) No hedging transactions Covered Persons are prohibited from purchasing any financial instruments (such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in any transactions that hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Covered Securities or limit the Covered Person’s ability to profit from an increase in the market value of Covered Securities. (iv) No margin accounts or pledges Covered Persons are prohibited from holding Covered Securities in a margin account or pledging Covered Securities as collateral for a loan. (5) Additional Information and General Guidance (i) Event-specific blackout periods may apply Although each Covered Person is always responsible for monitoring whether they are aware of material non-public information, from time to time Phillips may impose special trading restrictions. These event-specific blackout periods will normally be limited to those individuals who are aware of specific information that Phillips determines may be considered material non-public information, for example, a potential acquisition or divestiture. If a Covered Person is subject to the blackout, they may not trade in Covered Securities until notified that the blackout has ended. The General Counsel will determine whether an event-specific blackout should be imposed. The existence of an event-specific blackout will not be generally announced. If a Covered Person is covered by the event-specific blackout, they will be notified by the Legal Department. Any person made aware of an event-specific blackout should not disclose the existence of the blackout to anyone else. (ii) Frequent trading of Covered Securities is strongly discouraged Frequent trading of Covered Securities can create an appearance of wrongdoing even if the decision to trade was based solely on public information. Covered Persons are strongly discouraged from trading in Covered Securities for short-term trading profits. Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 6 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy (iii) Limited use of standing orders Standing orders in Covered Securities should be used only for a short duration and must be placed while a Covered Person is not aware of material non-public information. A standing order placed with a broker to sell or purchase stock at a specified price leaves the Covered Person with no control over the timing of the transaction, and a standing order transaction executed by the broker when a Covered Person is aware of material non-public information may result in unlawful insider trading. A standing order incorporated into a 10b5-1 plan (described below) is permitted. (iv) Trading plans satisfying the requirements of SEC Rule 10b5-1 Rule 10b5-1 provides an affirmative defense to illegal insider trading charges. The affirmative defense is available when a person, while not aware of material non-public information, enters into a written plan for trading securities (a “10b5-1 plan”). The 10b5-1 plan must meet certain requirements of specificity as to amount, price and timing of the trades. The plan must also be entered into in good faith and without any purpose of evading the prohibitions of the SEC’s rules. There are restrictions on the ability to amend, terminate and/or modify an existing 10b5-1 plan and certain public disclosure requirements regarding 10b5-1 plans apply to directors and executive officers. Where a valid 10b5-1 plan has been established, trades executed by the broker as specified by the plan do not violate the securities laws or this Policy even if the individual is aware of material non-public information about Phillips or the Covered Securities at the time the trades are executed. The compliance of any 10b5-1 plan with the applicable SEC rules is the responsibility of the person entering into such plan. See “Requirements applicable to 10b5-1 trading plans,” for further details. B. Non-public information must be kept confidential Covered Persons should avoid communicating non-public information about Phillips to any person (including Family Members, friends and co-workers) unless the person has a need to know the information for business-related reasons. This applies without regard to the materiality of the information. Covered Persons should be discreet with non-public information, refrain from posting non-public information on social media, or discussing it in public places where it can be overheard, such as elevators and other public spaces in company offices, restaurants, taxis and airplanes. Likewise, Covered Persons should take care to protect sensitive information from access by unauthorized persons, for example by allowing sensitive information displayed on a laptop computer to be viewed by someone sitting next to them on an airplane. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, Covered Persons should refrain from providing advice or making recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of Covered Securities. If a Covered Person communicates material non-public information that someone else uses to trade in Covered Securities, such Covered person can be held liable for civil and criminal penalties as a result of the other person’s trading. This applies even though the Covered Person did not trade and did not financially benefit from the other person’s trading. C. Post-employment transactions subject to this Policy Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 7 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy If an individual is aware of material non-public information when his or her service or employment terminates, that individual may not trade in Covered Securities until that information has become public or is no longer material. This Policy will continue to apply to Restricted Persons (as defined below) after the Restricted Person has separated from service until the later of (i) the first trading day after any material non-public information known to the Restricted Person has become public or is no longer material; or (ii) the expiration of any blackout period pending at the time of the separation of the Restricted Person. IV. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO RESTRICTED PERSONS & PRE- CLEARANCE PERSONS “Restricted Persons” are those who are at an enhanced risk of possessing inside information and who therefore must exercise greater diligence to comply with insider trading prohibitions. This group includes all members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of Phillips 66, as well as certain other persons in roles that make it likely they will regularly have access to material non-public information, and their Family Members and Controlled Entities. This list is updated periodically by the Legal Department, and Covered Persons will be notified if they are considered a Restricted Person under this Policy. A subset of Restricted Persons is subject to the pre-clearance procedures set forth in this Policy. These “Pre-Clearance Persons” include all members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of Phillips 66, as well as certain other senior employees designated by Phillips as subject to Phillips’ pre-clearance procedures, and their Family Members and Controlled Entities. This list is updated periodically by the Legal Department, and Covered Persons will be notified if they are considered a Pre-Clearance Person under this Policy. A. Trading during quarterly blackout periods is prohibited Except as otherwise provided in this Policy, no Restricted Person may trade in Covered Securities during a quarterly blackout period, regardless of whether they are then actually aware of material non-public information. A quarterly blackout period is in effect starting on the tenth day before the end of each fiscal quarter (December 21, March 21, June 20 and September 20) and ending when two full trading days have passed following the public announcement of Phillips’ quarterly financial results. For example, assuming the trading markets are open each day, the following indicates when the information would be considered public after Phillips announces earnings: Announcement on Tuesday First Day of Trading Before market opens Thursday While market is open Friday After market closes Friday Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 8 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy Notwithstanding the above, certain transactions are not prohibited during a quarterly blackout period, including transactions outlined in Section III(A)(3) of this Policy to which the prohibition against transacting while in possession of material non- public information does not apply and to trades pursuant to a valid pre-existing 10b5-1 plan. These exceptions are also outlined in Appendix A, “Summary of Trading Restrictions on Covered Securities.” Restricted Persons should consult with the Legal Department for any questions. B. Pre-Clearance Persons must obtain pre-clearance before trading in Covered Securities Pre-Clearance Persons must obtain pre-clearance from the Legal Department before engaging in any transaction involving Covered Securities. Requests for pre-clearance should be made at least two business days in advance of the proposed transaction. It is extremely important that Pre-Clearance Persons comply with the pre-clearance procedures to allow sufficient time to review transactions and, if applicable, to allow sufficient time to prepare any SEC filings required for the transaction. Pre-Clearance Persons may seek pre-clearance of a transaction by contacting the Legal Department. Such Pre-Clearance Persons should provide information regarding the type of transaction intended. Additionally, Pre-Clearance Persons requesting pre- clearance will be required to represent that they are not in possession of any material non-public information concerning Phillips before clearance will be granted. Questions or concerns regarding the possession of possibly material non-public information should be directed to the Legal Department. Phillips is under no obligation to approve a transaction submitted for pre-clearance and may determine not to permit a transaction, even if it would not violate the federal securities laws or a specific provision of this Policy. The fact that an intended trade has been denied pre-clearance should be treated as confidential information and should not be disclosed to any person. If a request for pre-clearance is approved, the transaction should be affected within four business days (or, if sooner, prior to the commencement of a quarterly or event-specific blackout period). Under no circumstance may a person trade while aware of material non-public information about Phillips, even if pre-cleared. Thus, if a Pre-Clearance Person becomes aware of material non-public information after receiving pre-clearance, but before the trade has been executed, they must not affect the pre-cleared transaction. Phillips’ approval of any particular transaction under this pre-clearance procedure does not insulate any Pre-Clearance Person from liability under the securities laws. Under the law, the responsibility for determining whether an individual is aware of material non-public information about Phillips rests with that individual in all cases. C. Requirements applicable to 10b5-1 trading plans Directors, officers, and employees, including Restricted Persons, may enter into 10b5-1 plans, in which case restrictions on trading otherwise applicable under this Policy will not apply to the extent transactions are executed in compliance with the 10b5- 1 plan and applicable law. Under Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 9 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy this Policy, the adoption, amendment or termination of a 10b5-1 plan must meet the requirements set forth in Appendix B, “Guidelines for Rule 10b5-1 Plans.” In the case of pre-clearance for a 10b5-1 plan, the 10b5-1 plan must be executed within four business days (or, if sooner, prior to commencement of a quarterly or event-specific blackout period). Note that special requirements and pre-clearance procedures apply to modifications and terminations of 10b5-1 plans. Please consult Appendix B, “Guidelines for Rule 10b5-1 Plans,” for details. Phillips is under no obligation to approve a 10b5-1 plan submitted for pre-clearance and may determine not to permit entry into a 10b5-1 plan, even if it would not violate the federal securities laws or a specific provision of this Policy. The fact that entry into a plan has been denied pre-clearance should be treated as confidential information and should not be disclosed to any person. Under no circumstance may a person initiate a 10b5-1 plan while aware of material non-public information about Phillips, even if pre- cleared. Thus, if a Covered Person becomes aware of material non-public information after receiving pre-clearance, but before the 10b5-1 plan has been initiated, they must not initiate the pre-cleared 10b5-1 plan. Because the SEC rules on trading plans are complex, Covered Persons should consult with their own legal and financial advisors and be sure they fully understand the limitations and conditions of the rules before establishing a 10b5-1 plan. V. COMPANY TRANSACTIONS From time to time, Phillips may engage in transactions in its own securities. It is Phillips’ policy to comply with all applicable securities and state laws (including appropriate approvals by the Board of Directors or appropriate committee thereof, if required) when engaging in transactions in Covered Securities. VI. LEGAL DEPARTMENT CONTACTS Any questions about this Policy, its application to a proposed transaction, the requirements of applicable laws or requests for pre-clearance should be directed to: • *********, by email at ********* or by phone at (***) ***-****; • *********, by email to ********* or by phone at (***) ***-****; or • *********, by email to *********. Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 10 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy Appendix A: Summary of Trading Restrictions on Covered Securities The following outline is a summary of trading restrictions that apply to transactions in Covered Securities: (1) at any time a Covered Person is in possession of material non-public information about Phillips and (2) during blackout periods for Restricted Persons. Note that Pre-Clearance Persons always have to pre-clear transactions as detailed in Section IV.B of the Policy. Transaction Description Trading Restrictions 1. Purchase or Sale of Covered Securities in Market Transactions Prohibited 2. Transactions in benefit plans (e.g., Phillips 66 Savings Plans, both Thrift and Success Share Features) • Regular monthly contributions • Changes in monthly investment allocations to increase or reduce purchases of Phillips 66 stock • Sale of Phillips 66 stock to buy another investment asset • Sale of another investment asset to buy Covered Securities • Taking out a loan from the plan that results in a decrease in the balance of company stock in an investment account • An election to pre-pay a loan from the Savings Plan if the pre-payment will result in allocation of loan proceeds to the purchase of Phillips securities in the Savings Plan Permitted* Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited Prohibited 3. Dividend Reinvestments • Phillips 66 Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan Permitted* • Company share-based compensation plans Permitted* Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 11 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy 4. Exercises of Company-issued stock options • Paying exercise price and taxes in cash with no market sale of shares issued, or through Phillips withholding a portion of the shares underlying the options • Broker’s cashless exercise procedure with full or partial sale of shares issued to pay exercise price and taxes Permitted Prohibited • Any other contemporaneous sale of shares issued in connection with the exercise of a stock option during a restriction period Prohibited 5. Purchase or sale of non-Company-issued options and other derivative securities related to Covered Securities • Exchange-traded put and call options • Purchasing, selling, or writing over-the-counter options • Purchasing or selling other derivative securities Always Prohibited Always Prohibited Always Prohibited 6. Engaging in short sales Always Prohibited 7. Pledging Phillips securities as collateral for a loan or using Covered Securities as collateral in a margin account Always Prohibited 8. Purchases and sales of Covered Securities under a valid 10b5-1 plan Permitted** 9. Gifts Prohibited ________________________________ * Note: Permitted only if authorized other than during a blackout period and at a time when not aware of material non-public information about Phillips. ** Note: Subject to restrictions and pre-clearance set forth in Appendix B. Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 12 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy Appendix B: Guidelines for Rule 10b5-1 Plans Rule 10b5-1 (“Rule 10b5-1”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), provides an affirmative defense from insider trading liability under Rule 10b-5. In order to be eligible to rely on this defense, a person subject to the Policy must enter into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan for transactions in Covered Securities that meets certain conditions specified in the rule (referred to here and in this Policy as a “10b5-1 plan”). As such, Phillips permits its directors, officers and employees (collectively, “Covered Persons”) as well as such persons’ Family Members and Controlled Entities to enter into 10b5-1 plans and has adopted the following guidelines regarding the adoption, modification and termination of any such 10b5-1 plans. All references in these guidelines to Covered Persons should be read to include Family Members and Controlled Entities. Capitalized terms used in these guidelines without definition have the meaning set forth in the Policy. These guidelines are in addition to, and not in lieu of, the requirements and conditions of Rule 10b5-1. The Legal Department will interpret and administer these guidelines for compliance with the Policy and the requirements below. No personal legal or financial advice is being provided by the Legal Department regarding any 10b5-1 plan or proposed trades. Covered Persons remain ultimately responsible for ensuring that their 10b5-1 plans and contemplated transactions fully comply with applicable securities laws. It is recommended that Covered Persons consult with their own attorney, broker, or other advisors about any contemplated 10b5-1 plan. If a Covered Person is a director or Section 16 officer (as defined below), Phillips is required to disclose certain terms of that Covered Person’s 10b5-1 plan in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter in which the 10b5-1 plan is adopted, terminated or modified (as described below). 1. Pre-Clearance Requirement. The 10b5-1 plan must be reviewed and pre-approved in advance by the Legal Department prior to entry into the plan in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Policy and these guidelines. 2. Time of Adoption. Subject to the pre-clearance requirements described above, the 10b5-1 plan must be adopted at a time when: • the Covered Person is not aware of any material non-public information; and • a blackout period is not in effect (for anyone subject to blackout periods). 3. Plan Instructions. Any 10b5-1 plan adopted by a Covered Person must be in writing, signed and either: • specify the amount, price and date of the sales (or purchases) of Covered Securities to be effected; • provide a formula, algorithm or computer program for determining when to sell (or purchase) Covered Securities, the quantity to sell (or purchase) and the price; or Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 13 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy • delegate decision-making authority with regard to these transactions to a broker or other agent without any material nonpublic information about Phillips or the Covered Securities. Once adopted, a Covered Person may not subsequently influence how, when, or whether to effect purchases or sales with respect to the securities subject to an approved and adopted 10b5-1 plan. 4. No Hedging. A Covered Person must not have entered into or altered a corresponding or hedging transaction or position with respect to the securities subject to the 10b5-1 plan and must agree not to enter into any such transaction while the 10b5-1 plan is in effect. 5. Good Faith Requirements. A Covered Person must enter into the 10b5-1 plan in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the prohibitions of Rule 10b5-1. A Covered Person must act in good faith with respect to the 10b5-1 plan for the entirety of its duration. 6. Certifications for Directors and Officers. If a Covered Person is a director or officer, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act (“Section 16 officer”), the 10b5-1 plan must include the following certifications: (1) the Covered Person is not aware of any material non-public information about Phillips or Phillips securities; and (2) the Covered Person is adopting the 10b5-1 plan in good faith and not as part of a plan or scheme to evade the prohibitions of Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. 7. Cooling Off Periods. The first trade under the 10b5-1 plan may not occur until the expiration of a cooling-off period as follows: • If a Covered Person is a director or Section 16 officer, the later of (a) two business days following the filing of the Form 10-Q or Form 10-K for the completed fiscal quarter in which the 10b5-1 plan was adopted and (b) 90 calendar days after adoption of the 10b5-1 plan; provided, however, that the required cooling-off period shall in no event exceed 120 days. • If a Covered Person is not a director or Section 16 officer, 30 days after adoption of the 10b5-1 plan. 8. No Overlapping 10b5-1 Plans. No more than one 10b5-1 plan can be effecting trades at a time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, two separate 10b5-1 plans can be in effect at the same time (but not trading at the same time) so long as the later- commencing plan meets all the conditions set forth in Rule 10b5-1. Depending on the circumstances, terminating the earlier-commencing plan after entering into the later-commencing plan may cause plan(s) to no longer be eligible for the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1. For additional information about terminations, refer to Section 10. Please consult the Legal Department with any questions regarding overlapping plans. 9. Single Transaction Plans. Covered Persons may not enter into more than one 10b5-1 plan designed to effect the open- market purchase or sale of the total amount of securities as a Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 14 Phillips 66 | Insider Trading Policy single transaction during any rolling 12-month period. A single-transaction plan is “designed to effect” the purchase or sale of securities as a single transaction when the terms of the plan would, for practical purposes, directly or indirectly require execution in a single transaction. 10. Modifications, Amendments and Terminations. • Modifications, amendments and terminations of an existing 10b5-1 plan are strongly discouraged due to legal risks and can affect the validity and availability of the Rule 10b5-1 affirmative defense on trades that have taken place under the plan prior to such modification, amendment or termination. Under Rule 10b5-1 and these guidelines, any modification or amendment to the amount, price, or timing of the purchase or sale of the securities underlying the 10b5-1 plan will be deemed to be a termination of the current 10b5-1 plan and creation of a new 10b5-1 plan. • Any modification, amendment or termination of an existing 10b5-1 plan must be reviewed and approved in advance by the Legal Department in accordance with the pre-clearance procedures set forth in the Policy and Section 1 of these guidelines, and will be subject to all the other requirements set forth in Sections 2 - 10 of these guidelines regarding the adoption of a new 10b5-1 plan. Except in limited circumstances, the modification, amendment or termination of a 10b5-1 plan will not be approved unless: i. the modification, amendment or termination is conducted at a time when the Covered Person is not aware of material non-public information; and ii. a blackout period is not in effect (for anyone subject to blackout periods). Last Revised January 7, 2025 | 15 Exhibit 21 SUBSIDIARY LISTING OF PHILLIPS 66 At December 31, 2024 Company Name Incorporation Location Asamera Oil (US) Inc. US, Montana C.S. Land, Inc. US, California Centana Intrastate Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware Cimarron River Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware Collbran Valley Gas Gathering, LLC (75%) US, Colorado DCP Assets Holding GP, LLC US, Delaware DCP Assets Holding, LP US, Delaware DCP Black Lake Holdings, LP US, Delaware DCP Chesapeake LLC US, Texas DCP Cheyenne Connector, LLC US, Delaware DCP GCX Pipeline LLC US, Delaware DCP Grands Lacs LLC US, Michigan DCP Guadalupe Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Hinshaw Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Intrastate Network, LLC US, Delaware DCP James Lake Holding LLC US, Delaware DCP Litchfield LLC US, Michigan DCP LP Holdings, LLC US, Delaware DCP Lucerne 2 Plant LLC US, Delaware DCP Michigan Holdings LLC US, Delaware DCP Michigan Pipeline & Processing LLC US, Michigan DCP Midstream GP, LLC US, Delaware DCP Midstream GP, LP US, Delaware DCP Midstream Holding, LLC US, Delaware DCP Midstream LLC US, Delaware DCP Midstream Marketing, LLC US, Delaware DCP Midstream Operating, LLC US, Delaware DCP Midstream Operating, LP US, Delaware DCP Midstream, LP US, Delaware DCP New Mexico Development, LLC US, Delaware DCP NGL Operating, LLC US, Delaware DCP NGL Services, LLC US, Delaware DCP Operating Company, LP US, Delaware DCP Partners Colorado LLC US, Delaware DCP Partners Logistics, LLC US, Delaware DCP Partners MB I LLC US, Delaware DCP Partners MB II LLC US, Delaware DCP Pipeline Holding LLC US, Delaware DCP Raptor Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Receivables LLC US, Delaware 1 DCP Saginaw Bay Lateral LLC US, Delaware DCP Sand Hills Interstate Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Services LLC US, Delaware DCP South Central Texas LLC US, Delaware DCP Southern Hills Interstate Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Southern Hills Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware DCP Tolar Holdings LLC US, Delaware DCP Wattenberg Pipeline LLC US, Delaware DCP Wyoming Assets LLC US, Delaware DCP Zia Plant LLC US, Delaware Douglas Oil Company of California US, California eFuel, LLC US, California Hunt & Sons LLC US, Delaware Jackson Pipeline Company US, Michigan James Lake Gathering, LLC US, Delaware James Lake Gathering II, LLC US, Delaware James Lake Midstream, LLC US, Delaware Javelina Processing LLC US, Delaware JET Energy Trading GmbH Germany JET Petrol Limited Northern Ireland JET Petroleum Limited England JET Retail UK Limited England JET Tankstellen Austria GmbH Austria JET Tankstellen Deutschland GmbH Germany Kansas City Retail and Convenience LLC US, Delaware Kayo Oil Company US, Delaware KHQ LLC US, Delaware Linden Urban Renewal Limited Partnership US, New Jersey Marysville Hydrocarbons Holdings, LLC US, Delaware Mary Hydrocarbons LLC US, Delaware Merey Sweeny LLC US, Delaware National Helium, LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Alliance H2PL LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Aviation LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Canada Ltd. Canada, Alberta Phillips 66 Capital Holdings LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Carrier LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Central Europe Inc. US, Delaware Phillips 66 Communications Inc. US, Delaware Phillips 66 Company US, Delaware Phillips 66 Continental Holding GmbH Germany Phillips 66 DAPL Holdings LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Dos Picos LLC US, Texas Phillips 66 Energy Trading LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 ETCO Holdings LLC US, Delaware 2 Phillips 66 Export Terminal LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 GmbH Switzerland Phillips 66 Gulf Coast Pipeline LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Gulf Coast Properties LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 International Holdings Company US, Delaware Phillips 66 International Investments Ltd. Cayman Phillips 66 International Trading Pte. Ltd. Singapore Phillips 66 Investment Holdings LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 LCR Isomerization LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Limited England Phillips 66 Partners GP LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Partners Holdings LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Partners LP US, Delaware Phillips 66 Pension Plan Trustee Limited England Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Project Development Inc. US, Delaware Phillips 66 Project Shareholder Inc. US, Delaware Phillips 66 Receivables LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sand Hills LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Southern Hills LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Spectrum Corporation US, Delaware Phillips 66 Stillwater Retail Corporation US, Delaware Phillips 66 Stillwater Retail One LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Stillwater Retail Two LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sweeny Crude Export LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sweeny Frac 2 LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sweeny Frac LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sweeny-Freeport 2 Pipeline LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Sweeny-Freeport LLC US, Delaware Phillips 66 Treasury Limited England Phillips 66 TS Limited England Phillips 66 UK Funding Limited England Phillips 66 UK Holdings Limited England Phillips 66 WRB Partner LLC US, Delaware Phillips Chemical Holdings LLC US, Delaware Phillips Gas Company LLC US, Delaware Phillips Utility Gas Corporation US, Delaware Pioneer Investments Corp. US, Delaware Pioneer Pipe Line Company US, Delaware Qingdao Phillips 66 Energy Co. Ltd. China Radius Insurance Company Cayman Retail Holdings LLC US, Delaware Salt Lake Terminal Company US, Delaware Sentinel Transportation, LLC US, Delaware 3 SHC Insurance Company US, Texas Spirit Insurance Company US, Vermont Sweeny Cogeneration LLC US, Delaware WesTTex 66 Pipeline LLC US, Delaware Willbreeze Pipeline, LLC US, Delaware Certain subsidiaries are not listed since, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary at December 31, 2024. 4 Exhibit 22 LIST OF GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES As of December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 Company, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware (the “Guarantor Subsidiary”), has guaranteed each of the senior unsecured debt securities issued by Phillips 66 listed below. Phillips 66 directly owns 100% of the Guarantor Subsidiary. The guarantees (1) are unsecured obligations of the Guarantor Subsidiary, (2) rank equally with all of its other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, and (3) are full and unconditional and joint and several. Senior Unsecured Debt Securities of Phillips 66 Guaranteed by the Guarantor Subsidiary • 1.300% Senior Notes due February 2026 • 3.900% Senior Notes due March 2028 • 2.150% Senior Notes due December 2030 • 4.650% Senior Notes due November 2034 • 5.875% Senior Notes due May 2042 • 4.875% Senior Notes due November 2044 • 3.300% Senior Notes due March 2052 As of December 31, 2024, Phillips 66 has guaranteed each of the senior unsecured debt securities issued by Phillips 66 Company listed below. The guarantees (1) are unsecured obligations of Phillips 66, (2) rank equally with all of its other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, and (3) are full and unconditional and joint and several. Senior Unsecured Debt Securities of Phillips 66 Company Guaranteed by Phillips 66 • 3.550% Senior Notes due October 2026 • 4.950% Senior Notes due December 2027 • 3.750% Senior Notes due March 2028 • 3.150% Senior Notes due December 2029 • 5.250% Senior Notes due June 2031 • 5.300% Senior Notes due June 2033 • 4.950% Senior Notes due March 2035 • 4.680% Senior Notes due February 2045 • 4.900% Senior Notes due October 2046 • 5.650% Senior Notes due June 2054 • 5.500% Senior Notes due March 2055 Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-188564) pertaining to the 2013 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66, the Phillips 66 U.K. Share Incentive Plan, and the Phillips 66 Ireland Share Participation Plan, (2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-266428) of Phillips 66 Company and Phillips 66, and (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-264891) pertaining to the 2022 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of Phillips 66; of our reports dated February 21, 2025, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Phillips 66 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Phillips 66 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Phillips 66 for the year ended December 31, 2024. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Houston, Texas February 21, 2025 Exhibit 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-266428 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-188564 and 333-264891 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 21, 2024, relating to the financial statements of DCP Midstream, LP (the “Partnership”) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Denver, Colorado February 21, 2025 Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Mark E. Lashier, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phillips 66; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 21, 2025 /s/ Mark E. Lashier Mark E. Lashier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Kevin J. Mitchell, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phillips 66; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 21, 2025 /s/ Kevin J. Mitchell Kevin J. Mitchell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Annual Report of Phillips 66 (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 21, 2025 /s/ Mark E. Lashier Mark E. Lashier Chairman and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Kevin J. Mitchell Kevin J. Mitchell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer