Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Chemicals / Plant Health Care

Plant Health Care

phc · LSE Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker phc
Exchange LSE
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Chemicals
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2018 Annual Report · Plant Health Care
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
GROWING 
OUR 
BUSINESS

P

L

A

N

T

H

E

A

L

T

H

C

A

R

E

P

L

C

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

A

N

D

A

C

C

O

U

N

T

S

2

0

1

8

PLANT HEALTH CARE PLC
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2018

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Overview

WE ARE A LEADING PROVIDER OF PROPRIETARY 
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS TO GLOBAL 
AGRICULTURE MARKETS

We offer products to improve the health, vigour and yield of major field crops such as corn, soybeans, cotton and rice, as well as 
speciality crops such as fruits and vegetables. We operate globally through subsidiaries, distributors and supply agreements with 
major industry partners.

Our innovative, patent-protected biological products help growers to protect their crops from stress and diseases, and to produce 
higher quality fruit and vegetables, with a favourable environmental profile.

WHY INVEST IN US
•  Leading provider of proprietary biological products for agriculture 
•  Commercial business growing at 20% CAGR; generating cash from 2018 on
•  Validated technology platforms with strong IP estate: Plant Response Elicitors – PREtec
•  Launching PREtec products from 2021 onwards
•  Management highly experienced in agricultural R&D, licensing and sales
•  Targeting cash positive in 2020 within existing cash reserves; strict control of expenses

	Consolidated	statement	of	comprehensive income

Financial statements
36   Independent auditor’s report
41	
42	 	Consolidated	statement	of	financial position
43	 	Consolidated	statement	of	changes	in equity
44	 Consolidated	statement	of	cash flows
45	 	Notes	forming	part	of	the	Group	financial statements
68	 	Company	statement	of	financial position
69	 	Company	statement	of	changes	in equity
70   Notes forming part of the Company 

financial statements
IBC Directors and advisers

Strategic report
1  Highlights
2  2018 in review
4  At a glance
6  Our products and technologies
8  Chairman’s letter
14  Business model
15  Strategy
16  Key performance indicators (“KPIs”)
18  Principal risks and uncertainties
20  Financial review

Corporate Governance
23  Board of Directors
24  Corporate governance report
28  Audit Committee report
29  Remuneration Committee report
32  Directors’ report
34  Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

Visit our new website: 
www.planthealthcare.com
Access the online annual report: 
ar18.planthealthcare.com

Highlights

HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2018

OPERATIONAL
•  Harpin �ß was launched into sugarcane in Brazil in 

February 2018, which is a 10 million hectares opportunity. 
Over 20,000 hectares treated so far, a promising start.

•  Harpin �ß was launched into US corn in September 2018, 

which is a 90 million acre market. First use in the field will be 
in the second quarter of 2019.

•  The Company won the global award of Best New Biological 

Product for work on Citrus in Spain.

•  Nine companies, including all five of the top global 

agricultural/seed companies, tested peptides from our 
PREtec platforms during 2018.

FINANCIAL
•  Revenue from commercial products in 2018 increased by 5% 

to $8.1 million (2017: $7.7 million); Strong external sales 
growth in the Americas (up 105%) was offset by weaker sales 
in Rest of World due to slower draw-down of inventory.

•  Sales of core Harpin �ß products increased by 10% (8% in 

constant currency*), driven by broadly based growth in many 
countries. Harpin �ß and Myconate® products represented 
68% of sales in 2018 (2017: 69%).

•  Gross Margin increased to 65% (2017: 62%).

•  Adjusted LBITDA** reduced to $5.4 million (2017: $5.5 million).

•  Cash, cash equivalents and investments at 31 December 2018 

•  PREtec product pipeline defined, targeting $5 billion 

were $4.3 million (2017: $3.9 million).

market opportunities.

•  Regulatory submission to EPA for first PREtec peptide 

made in August 2018.

•  Substantial progress made in developing cost-effective 

production of PREtec peptides.

•  New strategy for commercialisation of PREtec: both 
technology licensing and direct sales to distributors.

•  On 27 February 2018, the Group successfully raised $6.7 million 
(net of costs) which was well supported by existing shareholders 
and brought in a number of new institutional investors.

*  Constant currency is defined on page 11.

**   Adjusted LBITDA: Loss before Interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation, 

share based payments and intercompany foreign exchange.

REVENUE
($’000)

CASH AND INVESTMENTS
($’000)

$8,128

$4,284

9
2
3
,
6

6
1
0
2

5
8
6
,
7

7
1
0
2

8
2
1
,
8

8
1
0
2

6
7
0

,

0
1

6
1
0
2

4
9
8
,
3

7
1
0
2

4
8
2

,

4

8
1
0
2

1

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORT2018 in review

A YEAR OF GROWTH

2018 has been a year of product 
launches, exploration into new 
markets and encouraging new 
technology trials.

$6.7 MILLION RAISED

HARPIN �ß LAUNCHED INTO 
SUGARCANE IN BRAZIL

The Group successfully raised 
$6.7 million (net of costs) which was 
well supported by existing shareholders 
and brought in a number of new 
institutional investors.

In 2018, demonstration field trials 
showed an average yield increase of over 
20%. Initial demand from growers was 
very encouraging (20,000 hectares 
treated). We confidently expect sales 
in Brazilian sugarcane to build over 
the coming years.

Read more about the successful 
launch of Harpin �ß in Brazil on p.6 

2018

FEB

JUL

2

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018“Weareveryencouragedbyprogresswith ramping
up Harpin�ßsalesintheUS andBrazil.TheBoard
is confidentof theCompanybecomingcashpositive
no laterthan2020,withinourexistingcashreserves.”

Dr Christopher Richards
Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

SEASONALITY OF REVENUE

Sales to some of our distributors are 
done in advance of the year-end in 
order to secure their inventory levels 
for next year’s growing season.

SEP

NOV

DEC

CORN SEED TREATMENT LAUNCH

HARPIN �ß WINS PRESTIGIOUS 
GLOBAL AWARD

INNATUS 3G FIELD TRIALS

Harpin �ß has been launched as a 
seed treatment product for field corn 
in the US and will be marketed and 
sold as a mixture product by a leading 
supplier to the US corn grower. 
Excellent opportunity for Plant Health 
Care to gain access to the 90 million 
acre US corn market.

H1 — POSITIVE PEPTIDE RESULTS

In the first half of 2018, evaluation 
partners reported positive results 
with our lead peptides in a range of 
more than 10 crops, uses and regions.

Plant Health Care awarded the 
prestigious global Best New Biological 
Product award for work with Harpin 
�ß in citrus in Spain.

We are continuing field trials with 
the Group’s Innatus 3G peptide 
PHC279 against Asian Soybean Rust 
(ASR) in Brazil.

SOUTH AFRICAN DROUGHT

South Africa experienced a prolonged 
drought in 2018 which has resulted 
in slower draw-down than expected 
on in-market inventory. 

ADDITIONAL PREtec 
AGREEMENTS SIGNED

Three more global agricultural/seed 
companies have signed agreements 
to evaluate Plant Health Care’s PREtec 
product candidates on multiple crops 
on three continents. These new 
collaborators are seeking novel, 
low toxicity biological products 
such as PREtec, to enable farmers 
to be more productive with lower 
environmental impact.

Read more about PREtec on p.7

3

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORT 
 
 
 
At a glance

WHAT WE DO...

Farmers confront many challenges in providing food for a rapidly growing and more prosperous world. 
These challenges include reducing the use of potentially harmful agrochemical products. Biological products 
are becoming an increasingly important part of the solution because of the benefits they offer.

COMMERCIAL
Plant Health Care’s Commercial business is driven by sales 
of Harpin �ß, a recombinant protein which acts as a powerful 
biostimulant, promoting the yield and quality of crops. The Group 
sells the proprietary soil treatment Myconate in selected 
countries. The Group sells Harpin �ß and Myconate through 
specialist distributors around the world. In Mexico, the Group 
also distributes third-party biological products.

NEW TECHNOLOGY
Plant Health Care’s New Technology is focused on PREtec – plant 
response elicitors. These are peptides (short chains of amino 
acids) which stimulate plants to increase yield and resist 
disease. The Group has so far launched four platforms of PREtec, 
which have been under evaluation by nine potential 
licence partners in 2018.

PRODUCTS

TECHNOLOGY

HARPIN �ß

MYCONATE

PREtec

Read more about our commercial offerings on p. 6

  INNATUS 3G

  T-REX 3G

  Y-MAX 3G

Read more about new technology on p. 7

HOWITWORKS

Plant Health Care products can be applied to:

SEEDS 
(Seed treatment)

PLANTS LEAVES 
(Foliar Applications)

PROTECTION 
from stress such 
as drought

PROTECTION 
from disease 
and promotion 
of growth

PROTECTION 
against soil pests

DEMANDFORBIOLOGICALPRODUCTSISINCREASINGRAPIDLY.

4

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018...AND WHERE WE DO IT

WHATARETHEADVANTAGESOF
BIOLOGICALPRODUCTS?

Safer products do not contaminate soils or 
the environment

Cheaper to develop than conventional 
agrochemicals

Promotion of sustainable agriculture

Safer for farmers to handle

As a result of these advantages, regulatory authorities 
around the world are adopting accelerated regulations, 
which allow biological products to come to market 
more quickly than conventional agrochemicals.

  Current commercial use

  PREtec trials

2018 SALES SPLIT BY REGION

1,731

3,127

($’000)21+

  Rest of World

3,270

  Mexico

  Americas

Read more about commercial sales on p. 6

5

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORT40
+
39
+
z
Our products and technologies

HOW WE ARE IMPROVING THE MARKET

After four years of trials, the Group launched Harpin �ß into 
sugarcane in Brazil in February 2018. There are 10 million hectares 
of sugarcane in Brazil, of which more than 50% are in Sao Paulo 
State. Demonstration trials have shown very substantial yield 
improvements, with average yield increase up to 20%, from a single 
foliar application of Harpin �ß. The product was launched under 
the brand H2Copla, exclusively in Sao Paulo state by Coplacana, 
the leading sugarcane cane co-operative, which services more 
than 70% of the sugarcane hectares in Sao Paulo State. The launch 
was very well received; the Group sold approximately $1.0 million 
into this market in 2018.

Also in Brazil, the Group is developing sales into soy, which 
is grown on 35 million hectares. Harpin �ß is applied as a seed 
treatment in soy and results in increased yields. Initial sales 
were made in the fourth quarter of 2018, through GAIA, 
a strong distributor in the Mato Grosso.

After several years of trials, the Group launched Harpin �ß into 
corn in September 2018. In this case, Harpin �ß is sold as a mixture 
product for on-farm seed treatment. The product is being sold 
by a leading distributor of inputs to corn growers, which supplies 
products into the 90 million acre US corn market. The Group sold 
$1.6 million for this launch in 2018; this product will be used on 
farm during the spring of 2019.

The Group is now launching Harpin �ß into soy, through the same 
distributor in the USA. The product was introduced into the market 
on a small scale (a soft launch) in early 2019; if results are promising, 
the product is expected to be sold on a larger scale in the latter 
part of 2019.

COMMERCIAL

HARPIN�ß
Harpin �ß is an exceptionally powerful biostimulant, which stimulates 
the plant’s natural defence systems. The result is increased yield, 
quality and improved resistance to soil pests and disease. Harpin �ß 
is a recombinant protein, developed from the original research 
at Cornell University by the Company’s Chief Science Officer 
Dr Zhongmin Wei on naturally occurring Harpin proteins. 

Sales of Harpin �ß have grown at 20% CAGR over the six years to 
2018, since we adopted a strategy of expanding registrations and 
developing distribution through new partners. We are now able to 
sell Harpin �ß in more than 14 countries. Sales were developed initially 
in a range of fruit and vegetable crops in the USA, Mexico, Europe 
and Africa. The focus over the last three years has been to enter into 
larger scale arable or row crops (such as corn, soy and sugarcane), 
which provide much larger sales opportunities.

In Mexico, Harpin �ß is now well-established as a biostimulant for 
vegetables such as bell peppers, which are grown in greenhouses 
for export to the USA. The Company is a significant player in the 
application of Harpin �ß in the bell pepper market in the Sinaloa/Baja 
California area of Mexico, delivering increased yield of higher quality 
product. The Group now sells in excess of $0.5 million of Harpin �ß 
in Mexico.

In Spain, the Group has been developing Harpin �ß to improve the 
quality of citrus fruits over the last five years. Studies in co-operation 
with Barcelona University have shown that applications of Harpin �ß 
result in more uniform skin formation and colour. The practical result 
is that growers have a higher proportion of their fruit which grades as 
export quality, thereby increasing their economic returns. This work 
was recognised in November 2018 in the prestigious Agrow Awards, 
which evaluates agricultural inputs from all around the world; the 
Company was awarded Best New Biological Product. The Group 
now makes sales of $0.6 million in Spain.

BENEFITSOFHARPIN�ßINBRAZIL

•  There are 10 million hectares of sugarcane in Brazil*.

•  Coplacana, our distributor, is the largest supplier of inputs for 

sugarcane in Sao Paulo state (5 million hectares).

•  Applications of H2Copla (Harpin �ß) have been shown to 

increase sugarcane yield by as much as 20% resulting in a 
potential 20 times return for the grower**.

•  Coplacana launched the H2Copla brand in February 2018.

* 

 Based on 2016 sugarcane harvested data and 2017/2018 projected data 
from USDA Foreign Agricultural Service’s GAIN report dated 19 April, 2017. 

**   Yield increase based on Plant Health Care field trials conducted on sugarcane 
in Brazil in 2017; Value and ROI based on cost data from Agrianual 2016 FNP – 
Informa report.

6

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018HOWDOESPREtecWORK?

Peptides

Receptor 
protein

Cofactor 
protein

Cell signal 
molecules

Cell 
membrane

Plant 
response 
elicitation

Biopesticides

Biostimulants

INNATUS 3G

T-REX 3G

Y-MAX 3G

Broad plant defence and 
growth platform

Nematode defence 
platform

Yield and growth 
platform

Value propositions

Yield improvement
Crop protection
Abiotic stress tolerance

NEWTECHNOLOGY

PREtec
PREtec (Plant Response Elicitor technology) is 
our core new technology, inspired by harpin proteins 
found in nature. Based on our unique understanding 
of how key amino acid sequences elicit a desired 
response in target crops, we are able to design 
families of peptides (chains of amino acids) that 
when applied to crops provide increased growth, 
disease resistance and other benefits for farmers. 
We have so far designed and filed patent 
applications for four peptide platforms from our 
research; three of these have been named and all 
four have been launched with partners. Each family 
of related peptides is considered its own 
platform, all covered by extensive patent filings. 
In the chart below, 3G signifies third generation 
product candidates (distinct from the second 
generation commercial Harpin �ß products). In 
addition, we have a fourth generation (4G) platform, 
consisting of the use of custom genes within plants 
and microbes to express the desired PREtec protein.

PREtec: fourpatent-pendingplatforms
Since 2012, the Group has conducted extensive 
laboratory, greenhouse and field trials, in our 
own facilities, with co-operators and with more 
than 10 evaluation partners. These trials have 
demonstrated the potential of our lead PREtec 
peptides in a wide range of crops to deliver 
targeted agronomic benefits, such as stronger 
root growth, resistance to attack by fungi and soil 
pests (nematodes) and improved recovery from 
the effects of drought. In parallel, we are well 
advanced in development of production methods, 
which hold out the promise of PREtec peptides 
being cost-effective in the field. In August 2018, 
the Group submitted an application for registration 
with the EPA in the USA for approval to sell PHC398 
as a biopesticide and expect to receive approval 
during 2020; registration of other peptides in the 
USA will follow, permitting the first launches of 
PREtec peptides in 2021. Registrations in Brazil 
will follow. 

Within each 3G platform, we are able to modify 
the peptide sequence in order to customise the 
performance of peptides in various ways. For 
example, to make them better at inducing resistance 
to pests and diseases in plants, to improve the 
tolerance of plants to drought or to accelerate 
root growth. Furthermore, we can optimise the 
physical and chemical stability of peptides, so that 
they are stable in mixtures with agrochemicals. 
Our 3G peptides are designed to be combined 
with standard crop protection products through 
both seed treatment and foliar applications.

7

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTChairman’s letter

PLANNING FOR GROWTH

“WithsuccessfullaunchesofHarpin�ß in cane 
andincornin2018,wehavebuiltthe
foundationsforacceleratedcommercial
growth.Ourpipelineofnewproductsfrom
PREtectargetsopportunitiesworth$5billion,
withlaunchesfrom2021onwards.”

Dr Christopher Richards
Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer

OVERVIEW
Plant Health Care® is a leading provider of proprietary 
agricultural biological products and technology solutions 
focused on improving crop performance.

The Group made further good progress in 2018 in both our 
commercial operations and continued development of our new 
technology. In the Commercial business, the launches of Harpin �ß 
in US corn and in Brazilian sugarcane during 2018 are confidently 
expected to substantially accelerate revenue growth in 2019 and 
beyond. In New Technology, we are transforming the PREtec 
peptide platforms into a rich product development pipeline with 
fast track to launches as early as 2021, reaching growers both 
through technology licences and through direct sales 
to distributors.

Commercially, sales growth was 5%, as increased sales in 
the US and Brazil were offset by materially reduced sales in 
South Africa. Gross Margin improved to 65%, as Harpin �ß rose to 
66% of sales; Harpin �ß has now grown at 20% CAGR (Compound 
Annual Growth Rate) since we re-launched the business in 2013. 
Increasing numbers of growers are discovering the benefits of 
Harpin �ß, as a biological product which delivers exceptional 
additional yield with favourable environmental profile.

In New Technology, nine companies, including the top five global 
agrochemical/seed companies, conducted PREtec field trials during 
2018. Peptide evaluation in greenhouse and field trials has now 
enabled us to define specific products for target markets; these 
markets have a total value in excess of $5 billion. Submissions have 
been made to the EPA, the relevant regulatory department in the USA, 
which are expected to result in first product registrations during 2020. 
We have advanced production methods for our lead peptides, which 
will provide cost-effective products in time for launches in 2021 
and beyond. To accelerate market entry, we are now developing 
plans to enter markets not only through technology licensing but 
also for direct sales to distribution partners in key markets; this new 
approach to commercialisation is expected to bring PREtec peptide 
products to market more rapidly and enhance the Group’s margins.

The Group successfully completed an equity raise in February 2018, 
raising $6.7 million (net of costs). We are confident that our cash 
reserves and income from our commercial sales are sufficient to 
take the Group to cash positive, no later than the end of 2020.

We report here separately on the two areas of focus for the 
business: Commercial and New Technology. We are organised in 
these two lines of business and report our Commercial business in 
three geographic segments – Americas, Mexico and Rest of World. 
We report our New Technology business in a single segment. 

8

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018COMMERCIAL
Our Commercial business sells our proprietary products 
worldwide through distributors and also distributes 
complementary third-party products in Mexico. 

Sales of core Harpin �ß products increased by 10% (8% 
in constant currency). Harpin �ß and Myconate® products 
represented 68% of sales in 2018 (2017: 69%). Harpin �ß 
sales have now grown at 20% CAGR since 2013. 

Rest of World

Mexico

Americas

  2016

  2017

  2018

$4,000

$3,000

$2,000

$1,000

0

$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
0

Harpin

Third-party

Myconate

  2016

  2017

  2018

Overall sales in 2018 were $8.1 million, an increase of 5% in both 
actual and constant currency* over 2017 ($7.7 million). Strong 
sales growth in the USA (up 31% to $2.1 million), Brazil ($1.1 million 
from nil in 2017), Spain (up 16%) and Mexico (up 9%) was offset 
by reduced sales in Europe/Africa (down 46%), due to slower 
draw-down of in-market inventory in South Africa. 

Sales in Brazil reached $1.1 million (nil in 2017). The launch 
in March 2018 of H2Copla, the exclusive brand of our distributor 
Coplacana into the 10 million hectare sugarcane market in Brazil 
was well received, boosted by trials which showed an ROI (Return 
on Investment) for growers of up to 20 times. Sales into sugarcane 
during the year were $1.0 million. In October, Harpin �ß was 
launched as a seed treatment in soy, with initial sales ex Plant 
Health Care of $0.1 million. We anticipate rapid sales growth 
in both markets during 2019.

In the USA, Harpin �ß was launched into the 35 million hectare 
corn market in 4Q 2018, through a very strong distribution partner. 
Trials have shown an illustrative ROI of 7 times or more to growers and 
the launch was well received with further demand anticipated in 
2019. The Group sold $1.6 million in 2018, which is expected to be 
consumed in the spring of 2019. Total sales for Harpin �ß in the 
USA reached $2.1 million (2017: $1.6 million).

Sales in Mexico grew 9% to $3.1 million (10% in constant currency), 
recovering from the effects of drought in 2017. In Spain, the Group’s 
work on the use of Harpin �ß to improve the quality of citrus was 
recognised by the prestigious global Agrow award for Best New 
Biological Product. Sales in Spain increased by 16% to $0.6 million 
(2017: $0.5 million). In South Africa, in-market sales in the 2017/18 
season did not reach ambitious targets and the 2018 early season 
was also hit by severe drought; as a result, the Group had lower 
sales. This resulted in sales being down by 46% in the  
UK/Africa region, to $1.7 million.

9

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTChairman’s letter continued

NEWTECHNOLOGY
New Technology is focused on novel proprietary biological solutions 
using the Group’s PREtec science and technology capabilities 
(PREtec stands for Plant Response Elicitor technology). PREtec 
is a novel, environmentally friendly approach to protecting crops, 
based on peptides derived from natural proteins. These proprietary 
peptides are stable and compatible with mainstream agriculture 
practices such as seed treatment and foliar sprays. By activating 
the innate growth and defence mechanisms of plants, PREtec 
peptides lead to higher crop yields and better protection against 
disease and environmental stresses such as drought.

Read more about new technology on p. 7

WHATISPREtec?
PREtec works by inducing natural defensive and metabolic 
responses in crop plants so that they suffer less harm from 
the usual stresses (like nematodes or disease) faced during 
a growing season. This is achieved by designing peptides 
that mimic the active sites of larger naturally-occurring 
proteins to which plants are evolved to respond defensively. 
These peptides are generally accepted as being safe to 
handle and having negligible toxicity. They do not leave any 
detectable residue and rapidly degrade so that they do not 
persist on the plant after application. For these reasons, 
PREtec peptides should be generally easier, cheaper and 
quicker to register for commercial use than most other 
agricultural chemicals.

PREtec generates the possibility of many peptide product 
candidates across several platforms; we have so far characterised 
and presented to our partners peptides from three related families 
of peptides, each of which is a platform for product development: 
Innatus™ 3G, T-Rex 3G and Y-Max 3G. A fourth platform has also 
been characterised. 

The Group believes PREtec has substantial potential to support 
farmers to increase yields and productivity. Our vision is for growers 
to apply a PREtec peptide on every hectare or acre of agricultural 
land in combination with conventional agricultural products to 
improve their performance, reduce their environmental impact, 
reduce the development of disease resistance to chemical 
pesticides, and increase yields. 

In 2017, the Group initiated field trials of PREtec peptides for the 
control of Asian Soybean Rust (ASR) in Brazil, together with partners. 
While earlier results had given promising results for ASR control, the 
trials in the 2017/18 crop did not show results sufficient to convince 
partners to move to license PREtec for soy in 2018. However, low 
doses of PREtec peptides did show significant yield increases 
and work continues on this target crop in the 2018/19 season, 
with encouraging early results.

During 2018, the Group conducted a full review of the potential 
product pipeline emerging from PREtec and of the routes to 
market for those products. The Group expects to launch the 
first products from PREtec as early as 2021.

The target markets for our current pipeline of PREtec peptides 
include corn and soy (yield increase through seed treatment), 
control of Asian Soybean Rust (ASR) and other diseases, sugarcane 
(yield and disease), enhanced plant nutrition, and nematode 
control in fruit and vegetable crops; most of the larger target 
markets are in North and South America. These markets are very 
large for both disease control and yield enhancement products. 

TAKING PREtec PRODUCTS TO MARKET; 
OUT TO 2022

INNATUS 3G

2015
•  Signed three evaluation agreements for Innatus 3G 

with major players

2016–2017
•  PHC develops and tests product concepts

•  Partners test PREtec and explore platform capabilities

•  Three additional partners added

2018–2019
•  Three additional partners added by end of 2018

•  Highly efficient manufacturing process for lead 

peptides developed

•  Large testing program for soybean disease control 

ongoing in Brazil

•  Application filed with USA EPA for first time 

Innatus 3G biopesticides

2020–2021
•  Regulatory approval expected for first product

•  Commercial licensing/distribution arrangements established

T-REX 3G, Y-MAX 3G + PREtec 4G

2016–2017
•  Present to potential partners

•  Complementary to Innatus 3G

•  New partners added focusing on evaluating T-Rex 3G 

and/or Y-Max 3G

2018–2019
•  Partners initiate large US field testing programs 

evaluating T-Rex and Y-Max in soy, corn and cotton

2020–2021
•  Commercial licensing/distribution arrangements established

The Group’s product pipeline will be addressing markets worth in 
excess of $5 billion. The increasing presence and relationships 
we have in both the USA and Brazil with Harpin �ß gives us a 
great advantage in these markets for new PREtec products.

For each of these target markets, we have identified a lead peptide 
and a back-up. The Group has made submissions for product 
regulatory approval in the USA, which are anticipated to result in 
first registration during 2020. Registration in Brazil will follow. 

10

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018NEWTECHNOLOGY CONTINUED
Strong progress has been made in developing efficient production 
methods for PREtec peptides. During 2018, the target production 
efficiency for PHC279 was comfortably achieved. Work on 
production methodology for other peptides is also promising. 
This gives the Group confidence that PREtec peptides will be 
cost-effective in the field and provide a competitive advantage. 
Preliminary estimates suggest margins could be comparable 
to those which the Group currently enjoys with Harpin �ß.

Work continues with evaluation partners to develop both 
technical profiles and routes to commercialisation. The Group 
expects to access the market through technology licences for 
several products. However, following the review of commercialisation 
strategy and recognising the growing strength of the Group’s 
commercial relationship with distributors, some of the products 
are now expected to be commercialised directly with in-country 
distribution. We believe that this sales route will take products 
to market more rapidly and result in higher margins being 
retained by the Group.

FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE
Net cash used in operations was $6.3 million (2017: $6.1 million). 
Included in the cash used in operations is an increase in the 
Group’s inventory offset by lower accounts receivable and 
accounts payable balances. The delay in the launch of the soy 
product caused the Group’s inventory to be $0.6 million higher 
than expected. The Group anticipates that this inventory will be 
consumed in the second half of 2019. 

CONSTANTC URRENCY
We evaluate our results of operations on both an as reported and a 
constant currency basis. The constant currency presentation, which 
is a non-IFRS measure, excludes the impact of fluctuations in foreign 
currency exchange rates. We believe providing constant currency 
information provides valuable supplemental information regarding 
our results of operations, consistent with how we evaluate our 
performance. We calculate constant currency percentages by 
converting our prior-period local currency financial results using 
the current period exchange rates and comparing these 
adjusted amounts to our current period reported results.

INTELLECTUALPROPERTYPROTECTIONOFPREtec:
Novel variations in peptide structures and their use in 
agriculture are patentable. It is possible to design a very 
large number of closely related peptide variants. Our first 
proprietary peptide platform, Innatus 3G, was introduced to 
partners in 2014-15. In 2016, we presented the next two 
platforms – T-Rex 3G and Y-Max 3G each of which has biological 
activity which is distinct from but complements Innatus 3G. 
We continue to design peptides which will be evaluated and 
launched in due course. 

Plant Health Care has an extensive global portfolio 
consisting of more than 40 patent applications pending 
worldwide which cover the various PREtec platforms and 
their use in agricultural applications. The patent applications 
also include the genes that code for those peptides in order 
to, for example, create crops having increased innate 
defensive responses to disease. The Group’s IP estate 
covers a significant share of the ‘space’ available for 
using peptides in agricultural production.

BOARDC HANGES
I have had the honour to act as Interim Chief Executive Officer, as well 
as Executive Chairman, since November 2016. The Board reviews 
these arrangements regularly and has requested that I continue as 
Interim CEO for the time being. The Board will review the situation 
periodically and may initiate a search for a new CEO in due course.

Dr. Richard Webb stepped down from his role as Executive Director 
for New Technology at the end of 2018. From that date, he resumed 
his earlier role as Non-executive Director.

The relevant experience and background of each member of 
the Board is set out on page 23.

11

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTChairman’s letter continued

PRODUCTDEVELOPMENTPIPELINE

Product

Lead peptide

Target geography

Target launch

Corn Seed Treatment for yield

Soybean Seed Treatment for yield

Treatment for Asian Soybean Rust

PHC404

PHC414

PHC279

Seed Treatment for Corn/Soy Drought Tolerance

PHC863

Foliar Micronutrient enhancer

Sugarcane Yield Booster

Nematode Control in Specialty Crops

Fungicide Booster

PHC404

PHC279

PHC949

PHC279

N. Am., LATAM

2021/2

N. Am, LATAM

2021/2

LATAM

LATAM

N. Am.

LATAM

N. Am.

N. Am., EMEA

2022

2022

2022

2022

2023

2024

OUTLOOK
Agriculture markets are generally stable at present. Demand for 
agrochemicals is unlikely to grow significantly until commodity 
prices increase. However, growers are increasingly adopting 
biological products, because of their potential to improve 
productivity while reducing environmental impact. Based on 
various reports, we expect growth in the demand for biological 
products to increase at approximately 10% per annum from 2018 to 
2020. We are confident that Harpin �ß sales will continue to grow 
significantly faster than the market for biological products as a 
whole over the medium term. However, sales in any one period will be 
subject to seasonal factors such as weather, timing of registrations 
and requirements of distributor partners. Furthermore, we sell our 
products into our distributors in advance of the growing season 
with the next year’s demand in large part driven by the conditions 
during that season. As a result, Group sales may not follow a strictly 
linear trend and in some cases can see short delays which can 
switch sales in some markets from one calendar year to the next.

We are confident of strong revenue growth in 2019, based on the 
successful launches of Harpin �ß in sugarcane and soy in Brazil 
and in US corn. In addition, we are launching a product for soy 
seed treatment in the USA in 2019, through the same distribution 
partner which launched the corn product in 2018. The combination 
of these product launches, on top of growth in existing markets, 
is in our view likely to accelerate our revenue growth over the 
coming years.

In PREtec we are focusing on accelerating product development, 
with a view to launching products from 2021 onwards. We expect 
to generate revenue in the coming years through both technology 
licensing and direct sales approaches. 

Plant Health Care has a clearly defined strategy, which we are 
implementing effectively. 2019 will be a decisive year for the 
Group, which we enter with confidence.

In closing, I would like to thank the entire Plant Health Care team 
for all their hard work during the year. Strong results come from 
great people, working towards shared goals. As Interim CEO, 
I am proud of the Group’s impressive team of highly motivated 
professionals, in whom I have the greatest confidence. 

Dr Christopher Richards
Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer
9 April 2019

12

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018PREtec:MOVINGFROMPLATFORMSTOPRODUCTS
Many peptide variants possible within each platform: Focus on lead peptides

3G platform

Performance focus

Lead peptides  
(synthetic  fermented product)

Partner trials  
started

Innatus 3G

Disease resistance,  
vigour, quality, yield

PHC398  PHC279 
PHC296  PHC863 
PHC958  PHC404 
PHC180  PHC148

T-Rex 3G

Nematode, yield

PHC097  PHC949

Y-Max 3G

Growth, roots, yield

PHC353  PHC414 
PHC326  PHC535

New Platform 3G

Drought, roots, yield

PHC678 

2015

2016

2016

2018

Discovery

Proof of 
 concept

Early  
development

Advanced 
development

Pre-launch

Commercial

Innatus 3G was our first platform. It delivers a range of disease and 
yield benefits to growers and has amassed the most comprehensive 
database of compelling crop use-cases in the Group’s testing and 
in tests conducted by partners. It has been under evaluation with 
four of the top global agricultural/seed companies. 

We are in the early stages of development of our 4G peptide platform. 
This platform entails the incorporation of genetic sequences in the 
plant enabling it to express peptides internally, thereby gaining the 
benefits of improved disease control and abiotic stress tolerance 
without the need to apply PREtec to the surface of the plant.

T-Rex 3G is a platform developed to protect crop plants against 
pest nematodes. It also shows good effects in limiting the loss of 
yield caused by drought stress. Y-Max 3G behaves as a biostimulant, 
promoting vigour and yield by regulating growth genes in the plant. 
As a biostimulant, Y-Max 3G has the potential to be registered very 
quickly in the USA on a state-by-state basis and will appeal to that 
segment of the industry focusing on the development and marketing 
of crop biostimulants. T-Rex 3G and Y-Max 3G were introduced to 
selected partners in the latter part of 2016.

Our laboratory, glasshouse and field trials, and a number of other 
trials run for us by university groups and other specialists, have 
continued to demonstrate that PREtec peptides from the Innatus 
3G, T-Rex 3G and Y-Max 3G families can deliver targeted agronomic 
benefits, such as stronger root growth, resistance to attack by 
fungi and soil pests (nematodes), and improved recovery from the 
effects of drought. All of these benefits lead to increased crop 
yield and quality which translates directly into higher financial 
return for growers.

Our fourth platform of 3G peptides offers a tool for improved 
resistance to drought, a major and increasing challenge for farmers 
in many parts of the world. This platform, which has not yet been 
named, is now being introduced to partners. 

In New Technology, nine companies, including the top five global 
agrochemical/seed companies, conducted PREtec field trials 
during 2018. For some of these companies, 2018 was their third or 
even fourth year of PREtec field trials. Further testing by partners 
will continue in 2019. The Group expects to engage in detailed 
discussions with some of these companies in late 2019 
and 2020 concerning commercial terms of access to select 
PREtec peptides for use in key crops and geographies. These 
discussions are expected to lead to one or more significant 
commercial transactions in due course. However, given the 
uncertain timing of concluding licences, the Group is actively 
seeking additional routes to market, with a view to launching 
products soon after first registrations are granted. These 
additional routes will include direct sales to distributors in the 
USA and Brazil. Relationships which we have established with 
large distributors for the sale of Harpin �ß are developing in 
a very positive manner; these and other partners are highly 
interested in commercialising PREtec peptides. We anticipate 
that sales into certain markets through large distributors will 
allow us to launch products more quickly and to retain higher 
margins within the Group. We anticipate that a series of 
commercial collaborations will be finalised in due course, 
which will target launches of products from 2021 onwards. 

13

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTBusiness model and strategy

HOW WE DO BUSINESS

Plant Health Care believes that PREtec has very significant commercial potential. We have strengthened 
our commercial relationships with distributors and expect some of our products to be commercialise 
directly with in-country distributions.

RESEARCHANDDEVELOPMENT

NEWTECHNOLOGY

Plant Health Care has so far characterised 
four platforms and launched three of them:

  INNATUS 3G

  T-REX 3G

Y-MAX 3G

PLANTHEALTHCARE’SLABORATORY
IN SEATTLE:
•  Designs peptides from each platform 

and launched four of them.

•  Screen them for activity in protecting 
plants from stress such as drought 
or disease.

•  Select lead peptides for testing.

FIELDTR IALS
Field trials are run through a 
network of universities and 
specialist contractors.

COLLABORATING
WITH PARTNERS
Partners carry out laboratory, 
greenhouse and field trials on 
many crops and targets.

COMMERCIALISATIONWITHPARTNERS
Based on the strength of the Group’s 
commercial relationship with distributors, 
some of the products are now expected 
to be commercialised directly with 
in-country distribution. 

OBTAININGREGULATORY
APPROVALS
Regulatory rules vary across 
the world; Plant Health Care is 
pursuing “fast-track” 
approvals for PREtec peptides.

MANUFACTURINGPROCESS
During 2018, we developed 
production processes for 
PHC279. Fermentation is now 
being done at pilot scale. 
We are moving other lead 
peptides down this route.

OURPARTNERS
PREtec has been under evaluation by nine partners, including all of the 
“big five” global agricultural/seed companies.

OURVALUEPROPOSITIONS:

•  Corn & soybean Seed Treatment 

•  Disease control and improved 

Yield Enhancement.

yield in sugarcane.

•  Asian Soybean Rust Disease Control 

•  Nematode control in specialty crops.

and enhanced yield.

•  Fungicide booster.

14

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018OUR GROWTH STRATEGY

Our future growth will be achieved by focusing on the following key areas:

Key Area

Achievements

  Increasingsalesof
existingc ommercial
products

We intend to drive revenue in the short term in our Commercial business, 
focusing on Harpin �ß. We plan to grow in crops where Harpin �ß provides 
the most benefits to farmers, including sugarcane, corn, soy, citrus, 
tomatoes and potatoes.

Our partners have been evaluating our peptide platforms since 2015. 
With registration submitted in the USA and strong progress on 
manufacturing processes, we anticipate launches from 2021 onwards. 
We are targeting markets with a value of over $5 billion.

Links to KPIs

•  Revenue

•  Gross profit

•  Gross profit margin

•  Research and 
development

Plant Health Care has a unique understanding of PREtec, which will be 
important for evaluating and developing peptide products from our 
platforms. Our capacity to develop cost-effective production processes 
and our skill in achieving fast-track registrations will enable our partners 
to accelerate market launches. Our unique understanding of plant 
response elicitors will enable us to mine our platforms for further 
peptides over time.

•  Revenue

•  Research and 
development

Continuingtodevelop
furtherpeptide
platforms

We expect to discover more platforms over time.

•  Research and 
development

Launching peptide 
productsfromour
PREtecp latforms
both through 
technologyl icences
andindirect sales   
to distributors

Buildingfurtherthe
capabilitytodeliver
furtherpr oducts
from PREtec

1

2

3

4

OURRESEARCHANDDEVELOPMENTPROCESS

DISCOVERY

CHARACTERISATION

PARTNERE VALUATION

PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT

By leveraging our unique 
understanding of the structure–
function relationship of harpins 
we design novel and efficacious 
harpin-derived peptides.

Our focus is on identifying 
cost-effective solutions for 
some of the hardest problems 
facing farmers, such as disease 
and nematode control.

We work with industry leaders 
to fill gaps in their product 
portfolios and put PREtec 
technology into the hands 
of farmers everywhere.

With a focus on efficient 
manufacturing, compatibility 
with existing agricultural 
practices, and low product 
use rates, PREtec peptides 
will help farmers sustainably 
feed the growing population.

15

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTKey performance indicators (“KPIs”)

HOW WE MEASURE SUCCESS

The Group uses a range 
of performance measures 
to monitor and manage 
the business effectively. 
These are both financial 
and non-financial. The most 
significant relate to Group 
financial performance and to 
the Group’s progress in driving 
the two pillars of its strategy.

FINANCIAL

The KPIs for financial performance of 
the Commercial area and for the Group 
as a whole include revenue, gross profit 
and margin. These KPIs indicate the 
volume of work the Group has undertaken, 
as well as the valuation with which this 
work has been delivered.

The KPIs for financial performance 
for the year ended 31 December 2018, 
with comparatives for the year ended 
31 December 2017. 

REVENUE
($’000)

$8,128

9
2
3
,
6

6
1
0
2

5
8
6
,
7

7
1
0
2

8
2
1
,
8

8
1
0
2

LINK TO STRATEGY

1

2

3

4

16

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL

GROSS PROFIT
($’000)

$5,271

GROSS PROFIT MARGIN
(%)

64.9%

3
9
8
,
3

6
1
0
2

2
3
7
,
4

7
1
0
2

1
7
2

,
5

8
1
0
2

5
.
1
6

6
1
0
2

6
.
1
6

7
1
0
2

9
.

4
6

8
1
0
2

NON-FINANCIAL

The KPIs for non-financial 
performance relate to the Group’s 
technologies and include the number 
and nature of relationships realised 
with partners, and progress along 
the paths to commercial launch 
of products. 

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
The Board continues to monitor 
the progress of its R&D activities 
and expenditures. As each research 
project advances, specific progress 
is reported to the Board and costs 
against budget are monitored. 
We anticipate refining the KPIs 
for R&D as each project develops. 

LINK TO STRATEGY

LINK TO STRATEGY

LINK TO STRATEGY

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

1

2

3

4

PROPRIETARYPRODUCTSALES

In addition, an important KPI 
is the movement in revenue 
and gross margins achieved 
from the sale of our 
proprietary products.

REVENUE

1,731

($’000)58+

  Americas (2017: $1,574)

  Mexico (2017: $570)

3,244

606

  Rest of World (2017: $3,200)

17

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORT11
+
31
+
z
Principal risks and uncertainties

EFFECTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT OF PRINCIPAL 
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

The Board is responsible for the 
systems of risk management and 
internal control and for reviewing 
their effectiveness. The internal 
controls are designed to manage 
rather than eliminate risk and 
provide reasonable but not absolute 
assurance against material 
misstatement or loss. Through the 
activities of the Audit Committee, 
the effectiveness of these internal 
controls is reviewed annually.

The Executive Committee reviews formally at least 
twice annually the Group’s risk register, along with 
potential causes and impact, controls and actions to 
minimise the probability of those risks materialising, and 
consider new risks and opportunities presented to the 
Group, making recommendations to the Board as 
appropriate at least once annually.

Our business is subject to a number of potential risks and 
uncertainties, including those listed below. The occurrence 
of any of these risks may materially and adversely affect 
our business, financial condition, results of operations 
and future prospects. We manage and mitigate these 
risks by executing the strategy described above. 

IDENTIFYRISK

REVIEW&
EVALUATERISK

ASSESSRISK

BOARDOF
DIRECTORS

UPDATERISK
REGISTER

MITIGATERISK

EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE

AUDIT
COMMITTEE

REMUNERATION
COMMITTEE

DIVISIONAL&
FUNCTIONAL TEAMS

18

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018RISK

DESCRIPTION

CAPITALMARKETS,
FINANCIAL AND 
LIQUIDITY RISK

•  We have a history of losses since inception, and anticipate continuing to incur losses in the future, and may not achieve 

or maintain profitability.

•  We do not expect to require additional financing in the future. However, a shortfall in achieving our sales or working 
capital targets could exhaust our cash reserves. This may compel the Group to seek additional financing. The Group 
may be unable to obtain such financing on favourable terms or at all, which could force us to delay, reduce or eliminate 
our research, development or commercial activities. 

•  Our reputation and share price depend on delivering against our stated objectives. If we are unable to meet market 

expectations, our share price may decrease and we may lose shareholders.

•  Sales in any one period will be subject to seasonal factors such as weather, timing of registrations and third-party 
relations. As a result, Group sales may not follow a strictly linear trend which makes sales forecasting challenging.
•  These risks are mitigated by being prudent management of the Group’s cash, controlling costs and maintaining 

strong investor support.

COMMERCIALISATION RISK •  We are subject to risks relating to product concentration due to the fact that we derive substantially all of our 

revenues from our Harpin �ß and Myconate product lines and from the sale of third-party products. 

•  We may be unable to establish or maintain successful relationships with third-parties, which could materially and 

adversely affect our sales. 

•  We have a limited number of sales and marketing personnel and will need to expand our sales and marketing 

capabilities to grow revenues from our commercial products.

•  These risks are mitigated by continuing to promote our products, perform regular reviews of our commercial 

business plans and continued product development.

•  Our PREtec peptide development depends on demonstrating that the products can perform in the field against 

targeted value propositions. Trials can be influenced by weather and other factors, which can result in the trials having 
to be repeated; this can lead to delays of a year in product launches.

•  We are developing new production methods for the commercial manufacture of PREtec peptides. We may be 

unsuccessful in achieving our targets for Cost of Goods. We may not be able to conclude agreements with out-sourcing 
manufacturing partners or we may experience delays in scaling up to full commercial production. Our PREtec 
product launches depend on evaluation and distribution partners converting their declared interest into formal 
commercial transactions.

•  While a number of patents have been filed to date, we may be unable to secure adequate protection for the 

intellectual property covering our New Technology and product candidates, or develop and commercialise these 
product candidates without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties.

•  These risks are mitigated by reviewing and refining the strategy for commercialising our New Technology to 

include both technology licensing and direct sales to distributors.

• 

• 

• 

If we are unable to obtain regulatory approvals, or comply with ongoing and changing regulatory requirements, it could 
delay or prevent sales of our commercial products or impede the development of potential products. 

If we use PREtec in trait development, our technologies and product candidates will face more stringent regulatory regimes. 

If we are unable to comply with regulations applicable to our facilities and procedures and those of our third-party 
manufacturers, our research and development or manufacturing activities could be delayed, limited or prevented.

•  These risks are mitigated by conducting regular internal reviews to ensure our compliance with regulatory requirements.

•  Our future growth and ability to compete depend on retaining our key personnel and recruiting additional 

qualified personnel.

•  The success of the Group depends on obtaining and maintaining the appropriate level of skilled resources.
•  These risks are mitigated by keeping employees engaged in the strategy of the Group and the establishing 

of long-term incentives.

TECHNOLOGY RISK

REGULATORY
AND LEGAL RISK

PERSONNELAND
RESOURCES

FINANCIALI NSTRUMENTS
The Group uses various financial instruments, including cash, short-term investments of investment grade notes and bonds, and 
items such as trade receivables and trade payables that arise directly from its operations. 

Information on the risks associated with the Group’s involvement in financial instruments is given in note 19 to the financial statements.

On behalf of the Board

Dr Christopher Richards
Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer
9 April 2019

19

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTFinancial review

HOW WE ARE PERFORMING

“Salesincreased5%to$8.1million.
PlantHealthCareexperienced
impressivegrowthinourAmericas
segmentup105%.”

Jeffrey Hovey
Chief Financial Officer

A summary of the financial results for the year ended 
31 December 2018 with comparatives for the previous 
financial year is set out below:

Revenue

Gross profit

Operating loss

Finance income (net)

Net loss for the year

2018
$’000

8,128

5,271

65%

2017
$’000

7,685

4,732

62%

(8,033)

(5,801)

89

85

(7,944)

(5,716)

REVENUES
Revenues in 2018 increased by 5% to $8.1 million (2017: $7.7 million) 
as a result of strong growth in our Americas segment. The gross 
margin increased 3% to 65% (2017: 62%) due to level of margins 
achieved on strong sales in North America. 

AMERICAS
This segment includes activities in both North and South America 
but is exclusive of Mexico.

External revenue in the Americas segment increased 105% 
to $3.3 million (2017: $1.6 million). The increase in revenue was 
primarily due to increased sales of Harpin �ß in corn in North 
America and sugarcane in South America. The initial launch of 
our soy product in North America was delayed, but sales have 
started on a modest scale in early 2019. Revenue in the Americas 
is predominantly from Harpin �ß sales.

MEXICO
A significant portion of the Group’s revenue continues to come 
from Mexico. Revenue from the Mexican segment increased 9% 
(10% in local currency) to $3.1 million (2017: $2.9 million). This was 
due to the rebound of produce prices in the north-west portion 
of Mexico. Revenue in Mexico includes sales of Harpin �ß, 
Myconate and third-party products.

RESTOFWORLD
External revenue in the Rest of World segment decreased 46% 
(48% in constant currency) to $1.7 million (2017: $3.2 million). 
The decrease was primarily due to slower draw-down of in-market 
inventory in the South African region partially offset by a sales 
increase of 16% in Spain. Revenue in the Rest of World segment 
is predominantly from Harpin �ß and some Myconate sales.

OPERATINGEXPENSES
Operating expenses increased to $13.3 million from $10.5 million. 
The increase was principally due to a non-cash expense in relation 
to Sterling loans within our UK subsidiary resulting in a foreign 
currency loss of $1.2 million (2017: foreign currency gain of 
$1.3 million). The foreign currency loss was charged to Administration 
expenses. During 2018, the Group agreed to transfer stock from 
our original distributor to a new distributor in South Africa in 
order to strengthen its sales position in this region. The transfer 
of stock has been accounted for by the Group recording a sale of 
$0.6 million to the new distributor and a write-off of receivables 
with the original distributor of $0.6 million. 

In addition, we have set out in Note 9 the separate category of 
expenditure relating to Business Development, which decreased 
to $0.5 million in 2018 (2017: $0.6 million). This relates to reduced 
personnel costs and other costs relating to customer support 
and market research. 

Unallocated corporate expenses increased $3.2 million to 
$2.9 million (2017: $0.3 million gain). The increase was attributable 
to the decrease in the value of Sterling loans from our UK subsidiary 
due to the appreciation of the Pound.

BALANCES HEET
At 31 December 2018 and 2017, investments, cash and cash 
equivalents were $4.3 million and $3.9 million respectively. 

Working capital increased to $8.6 million in 2018 (2017: $7.2 million). 
The increase is primarily due to increased inventory of $1.4 million. 
Other contributors to the working capital increase was lower 
accounts receivable and accounts payable balances. The Group 
made significant Harpin �ß and other inventory purchases 
($1.0 million) in the second half of 2018. The Group expects this 
inventory to be consumed in the first half of 2019. The launch of 

20

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018a new product for the soy crop in the USA was delayed, with its 
associated revenues, until 2019. This delay caused our inventory 
levels to be $0.6 million higher than anticipated. The Group 
expects the inventory for the soy product to be used during 2019.

Translation of the results of foreign subsidiaries for inclusion 
within the consolidated Group results resulted in an exchange 
gain of $1.1 million recorded within Other Comprehensive Income 
and Foreign Exchange Reserves (2017: loss of $1.3 million).

CASHFLOWANDLIQUIDITY
Net cash used in operations was $6.3 million (2017: $6.1 million). 
Included in the cash used in operations is an increase in the 
Group’s inventory offset by lower accounts receivable and 
accounts payable balances. The delay in the launch of the soy 
product caused the Group’s inventory to be $0.6 million higher 
than expected. The Group anticipates that this inventory will be 
consumed in the second half of 2019.

Net cash provided by investing was $0.9 million in 2018 
(2017: $2.6 million). The Group holds surplus cash in several 
bond and money market funds. The movement in these funds 
was used to further invest in the New Technology business 
and fund the Commercial business.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $6.7 million 
for 2018 (2017: $nil). The difference is due to a $6.7 million 
(net of costs) fundraise concluded in February 2018 from 
new and existing investors.

GOINGC ONCERN
In assessing whether the going concern basis is an appropriate 
basis for preparing the 2018 Annual Report, the Directors have 
utilised its detailed forecasts which take into account its current 
and expected business activities, its cash and cash equivalents 
balance and investments of $4.3 million as shown in its balance 
sheet at 31 December 2018, the principal risks and uncertainties 
the Group faces and other factors impacting the Group’s 
future performance.

The key assumptions supporting the assessment for the period 
ended 31 December 2018 are as follows:

•  Achievement of our revenue targets in the Americas and Mexico;

•  Ability to continue manufacturing Harpin �ß; and

•  Continued containment of cash operating expenses.

The principal downside stress tests in accordance with the 
Group’s principal risks and uncertainties are:

•  A significant reduction of projected sales volumes of Harpin �ß 
due to lower demand from our distributors, impact of weather 
or the inability to supply product;

•  Extension of payment terms or full default of receivables with 

some of our distributors; and

•  Inability to reduce operating expenses 

Various sensitivity analyses have been performed to reflect 
possible downside scenarios as referred to above. Even in the 
worst case scenario whereby the Group achieves reduced revenues 
for the twelve months following the date of this Annual Report, 
the Group has sufficient resources to continue in operational 
existence for a period of at least 12 months from the approval of 
the financial statements. In order to provide sufficient headroom, 
the Directors have identified costs savings associated with the 
reduction in revenues and have the ability to identify further cost 
savings if necessary.

At the time of approving the financial statements the Directors 
have a reasonable expectation that the Company and the Group 
have adequate resources to continue in operational existence 
for the 12 months from sign off of the annual report. Thus they 
continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in 
preparing the 2018 Annual Report.

21

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018STRATEGIC REPORTCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

23   Board of Directors
24   Corporate governance report
28   Audit Committee report
29  Remuneration Committee report
32  Directors’ report
34  Statement of Directors’ responsibilities

22

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Board of Directors

STRONG EXPERIENCED BOARD

DR CHRISTOPHER G J RICHARDS
(Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer)
Length of Tenure
6 years

MICHAEL J HIGGINS
(Senior Independent Director)
Length of Tenure
5 years

Dr. Christopher Richards joined the Company as Non-executive Chairman 
in August 2012. He became Executive Chairman in April 2015 to take on 
a more active role in investor relations and in developing strategy, 
particularly the focus on New Technology. Following the departure of 
Paul Schmidt in November 2016, Dr. Christopher Richards became the 
Interim Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Christopher Richards spent 20 years 
at Syngenta and its predecessor companies in various strategic 
management positions in South America, Europe and Asia. In November 
2003, he was appointed COO of Arysta LifeScience, and he served as CEO 
from 2004 until 2010, leading Arysta LifeScience’s transformation into a 
global agrochemical company with sales above $1.6 billion. He also 
served as a Director of Arysta LifeScience from 2003 to 2015. He serves 
on the Board of Directors of Origin Enterprises plc, a service provider to 
farmers for food production solutions, and is Chairman of Nanoco Group 
plc, a nano-materials technology company carrying out research, 
development and commercialisation of products based on heavy-metal 
free quantum dots. 

Michael Higgins joined the Company in May 2013 as Senior Independent 
Director and Chair of the Audit Committee. He also serves as a member 
of the Remuneration Committee. He currently serves as a Non-Executive 
Director of Progility Limited, a project management services group and a 
non-executive director of Premier Technical Services Group plc, a niche 
specialist services provider. Michael is also non-executive Chairman of 
IPSX UK Ltd which has received regulatory approval to operate the first 
regulated securities exchange dedicated to the IPO and secondary trading 
in Exchange Traded Properties. He is also a Non-Executive Director of the 
Quoted Companies Alliance, a non-profit organisation that champions 
the interests of small to mid-sized publicly traded companies and is an 
alternate member of the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers on behalf of the 
Quoted Companies Alliance. Michael Higgins was a partner at KPMG for 10 
years and subsequently served as a senior adviser. Prior to KPMG, 
Michael Higgins was a Director at Charterhouse Bank, worked at Saudi 
International Bank and qualified as an accountant with Price Waterhouse 
(now PricewaterhouseCoopers). 

DR RICHARD H WEBB
(Non-Executive Director)
Length of Tenure
5 years

WILLIAM M LEWIS
(Non-Executive Director)
Length of Tenure
3 years

Richard Webb joined the Company in September 2013 as a Non-Executive 
Director. In January 2015, he was appointed an Executive Director, 
responsible for leading the New Technology strategy and licensing. 
In January 2019 he became a Non-Executive again. Early in his career 
he held various positions at Imperial Chemical Industries, including 
responsibilities for managing laboratory discovery and field development 
programmes for its public health pesticide business. Thereafter he 
worked as a consultant mostly with life sciences businesses. It was in this 
capacity that he was originally engaged by the Company between 2012 
and 2014 to work on the development of its new business strategy. 
His doctorate, in pest biology, was from the London School of Hygiene 
& Tropical Medicine.

William Lewis joined the Company as a Non-Executive Director in 
April 2015. He also currently serves as Chairman of the Remuneration 
Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Since June 2014, 
William Lewis has served as President and CEO of Summit Agro USA, LLC, 
a joint venture agrochemicals business between Sumitomo Corporation 
and ISK Biosciences. He previously held senior roles within Arysta 
LifeScience, Syngenta Crop Protection and Zeneca/ICI. William Lewis 
has also been an owner/operator of two John Deere dealerships in GA 
where he improved the overall operations and value of the business, 
which led to the successful sale of the businesses.

23

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate governance report

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT

Introduction
Plant Health Care plc (the “Company”) is committed to maintaining 
the highest standards of corporate governance throughout its 
operations and to ensuring that all of its practices are conducted 
transparently, ethically and efficiently. The Company believes 
that continual review of all aspects of its business and reflecting, 
analysing and improving its procedures will result in the continued 
success of the Company and improve shareholder value. 
Therefore, and in compliance with the updated AIM Rules for 
Companies, the Company has chosen to formalise its governance 
policies by complying with the UK’s Quoted Companies Alliance 
Corporate Governance Guidelines for Small and Mid-Size Quoted 
Companies (the “QCA Code”).

The Company has followed the QCA Code’s recommendations in 
terms of disclosures to be made on its website and in this Annual 
Report. Specifically, the QCA Code has 10 principles being:

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

 Establish a strategy and business model which promote 
long-term value for shareholders

 Seek to understand and meet shareholder needs 
and expectations

 Take into account wider stakeholder and social responsibilities 
and their implications for long-term success

 Embed effective risk management, considering both 
opportunities and threats, throughout the organisation

 Maintain the board as a well-functioning, balanced team led 
by the chair

 Ensure that between them the directors have the necessary 
up-to-date experience, skills and capabilities

 Evaluate board performance based on clear and relevant 
objectives, seeking continuous improvement

 Promote a corporate culture that is based on ethical values 
and behaviours

 Maintain governance structures and processes that are fit 
for purpose and support good decision-making by the board

10.   Communicate how the company is governed and is 

performing by maintaining a dialogue with shareholders and 
other relevant stakeholders

Disclosures recommended by the QCA Code to be included on the 
Company’s website, and not in its Annual Report, being principles 
2, 3 and 9 may be found on the Company’s website. For more 
details regarding Corporate Governance, including the Company’s 
compliance with the ten principles of the QCA Code, please see 
the Company’s Corporate Governance Statement located at 
https://www.planthealthcare.com/investors/corporate-governance. 
Consideration of the remaining seven principles are described below. 

In assessing its compliance with the QCA Code, the Company’s 
Board of Directors (the “Board”) is mindful that in some areas it 
does not fully comply with the QCA Code. Such non-compliance, 
particularly with regard to the combined roles of Chairman and 
Interim CEO, reflects the size of the Group, its stage of development 
and the complex scientific/specialist nature of certain of its 
activities. The Board is alert to the potential risks this may 
create and has therefore provided the following background 
and explanation. 

Prior to November 2016, the Board had a separate Chairman and 
CEO and therefore maintained a separation of duties and also 
half of the Board was independent. During 2015-2016, the Group 
materially increased its investment into its New Technology 
business. Dr Webb took on certain executive responsibilities to 
develop and lead the New Technology segment of the Group’s 
business and was no longer an independent director. Following 
the departure of the then CEO in November 2016, it was considered 
by the Board that the Chairman had the right balance of Board, 
executive leadership and industry experience to lead the Group 
through a critical transition phase of its development. This phase 
included the investment in the leading position in the development 
of the New Technology segment of the Group’s business whilst 
also aggressively seeking to develop the position of its proprietary 
Commercial products. These two areas require several leadership 
and operational capabilities as well as a detailed appreciation of 
the science and market potential for the Group’s New Technology. 
Utilising the skills of an existing Board member has been a pragmatic 
way of managing continuity during this period. This combined 
position continues today and is regularly reviewed by the Board. 
The Chairman taking on the additional responsibility of Interim CEO 
has also meant that the Board no longer had the ideal split of 
independent and non-independent directors although it has 
maintained at all times two independent non-executive directors.

Richard Webb, who was originally a non-executive stepped into 
a full time role to take the New Technology activities through a 
period of significant change, The refinement of our strategy in 
the last 12 months and the great progress that has been made 
coincided with Richard relocating from the US back to the UK at 
the end of 2018. Richard has therefore stepped back to being a 
non-executive. Given his recent executive responsibilities he is 
not considered independent. He remains available and is continuing 
to provide consultancy services on specific projects in addition 
to his non-executive responsibilities.

The two independent non-executives, William Lewis with extensive 
commercial experience in the industry and Michael Higgins the 
senior independent director who has extensive Board experience 
and a financial background, are content that this is an appropriate 
position for the Group currently. However, it is kept continuously 
under review and will change when appropriate for the Group 

24

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018given its size and development. Mr Higgins has also stepped into 
the Chairman’s role for purposes of corporate governance and 
takes the lead for the Group on all corporate governance matters.

William Lewis and Michael Higgins chair the Group’s two key 
committees and also meet with the Chairman separately on a 
regular basis. Board meetings have appropriately robust 
agendas and are held face to face in the USA between 5 and 6 
times a year over one and a half days each. The USA is the main 
centre of activity and management of the Group. Each Board 
meeting also includes involvement of the key executive 
leadership not on the Board. Mssrs Lewis and Higgins are 
satisfied that the current Board has the right mix of skills that 
are relevant to the Group’s current position and stage of 
development. They are also satisfied that they present effective 
challenges to the executive Directors and management team. 

The Group has established specific committees and 
implemented certain policies and practices to ensure that:

•  it is led by an effective board which is collectively responsible 

for the long-term success of the Company;

•  the Board and the committees have the appropriate balance 
of skills, experience, independence, and knowledge of the 
Company to enable them to discharge their respective duties 
and responsibilities effectively;

•  the Board establish a formal and transparent arrangement 
for considering how it applies the corporate reporting, risk 
management, and internal control principles and for maintaining 
an appropriate relationship with the Group’s auditors; 

•  there is a dialogue with shareholders based on the mutual 

understanding of objectives; and

•  all aspects of the Group are run in a robust and responsible way.

The Company’s overall strategic objective is to be a leading 
provider of proprietary biological products. The Company’s 
strategy and business model and amendments thereto, are 
developed by the Interim CEO and his senior management team, 
and approved by the Board. The management team, led by the 
Interim CEO, is responsible for implementing the strategy and 
managing the business at an operational level. A comprehensive 
budgeting process is completed once a year and is reviewed and 
approved by the Board. The Company’s results, compared with 
the budget, are reported to the Board on a bi-monthly basis. 
The full strategy and business operations of the Company are set 
out in the Strategic Report section of this Annual Report on 
pages 1 to 21.

The Company’s business is subject to a number of potential risks 
and uncertainties. The occurrence of any of these risks may 
materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, 
financial condition, results of operations and future prospects. 
The Company manages and mitigates these risks by executing its 
strategy and operational plans as described above.

The Board is responsible for the systems of risk management 
and internal control and for reviewing their effectiveness. The 
internal controls are designed to manage rather than eliminate 

risk and provide reasonable but not absolute assurance against 
material misstatement or loss. Through the activities of the 
Audit Committee, the effectiveness of these internal controls is 
reviewed annually. The Company maintains appropriate 
insurance cover in respect of actions taken against the Directors 
because of their roles, as well as against material loss or claims 
against the Company. The insured values and type of cover are 
comprehensively reviewed on a periodic basis.

A summary of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the 
Company are set out on pages 18-19 of this Annual Report. The 
senior management team meets at least twice annually to review 
the Company’s risk register, along with potential causes and 
impact, controls and actions to minimise the probability of those 
risks materialising, and consider new risks and opportunities 
presented to the Company, making recommendations to the 
Board as appropriate at least once annually.

Board of Directors
The Board of Directors is responsible for the proper management 
of the Company by formulating, reviewing and approving the 
Company’s strategy, budgets, and corporate actions. In order to 
achieve its objectives, the board adopts the ten principles of the 
QCA Code. Through successfully implementing these principles, 
the Company believes it is able to deliver long-term growth for 
shareholders and maintain a flexible, efficient and effective 
management framework within an entrepreneurial environment.

It is important that the board itself contains the right mix of skills 
and experience in order to deliver the strategy of the Company. 
As such, the board is currently comprised of:

•  Dr Christopher G J Richards, Executive Chairman and Interim CEO; 

•  Dr Richard Webb, Non-executive Director;

•  Michael J Higgins, Senior Independent Director; and

•  William M Lewis, an independent Non-executive Director. 

The backgrounds and relevant experience of these directors 
is set out on the website. Richard Webb, who was previously 
Executive Director for New Technology, reverted to a 
Non-Executive role with effect from January, 2019.

Additionally, the Company has appointed a professional 
Company Secretary who is also our General Counsel who assists 
the Chairman and Committee Chairmen in preparing for and 
running effective Board meetings and Committee meetings, 
including the timely dissemination of appropriate information 
prior to meetings and minutes following the meetings. 

The Company Secretary provides advice and guidance to the 
extent required by the Board on the legal and regulatory environment.

Each Director serves on the board from appointment until the next 
annual general meeting at which he or she stands for election. 
Thereafter he or she stands for re-election in accordance with 
the Company’s Articles of Association which is no less than once 
every three years.

25

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCECorporate governance report continued

Committees
In compliance with UK best practice, the board has established 
the following committees.

Audit Committee
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to monitor the integrity 
of the financial statements of the Group and Company.

Some of the Audit Committee’s duties include:

•  reviewing the Group’s accounting policies and reports 
produced by internal and external audit functions;

•  considering whether the Group has followed appropriate 

accounting standards and made appropriate estimates and 
judgements, taking into account the views of the external 
auditor;

•  reporting its views to the Board of Directors if it is not satisfied 
with any aspect of the proposed financial reporting by the Company;

•  reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s 

internal financial controls and internal control;

•  reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company’s 

anti-money laundering systems and controls for the prevention 
of bribery and receive reports on non-compliance; and

•  overseeing the appointment of and the relationship with the 

external auditor.

The Remuneration Committee has two members, each of whom 
is an independent, non-executive director. The current members 
of the committee are William Lewis as the Chairman and Michael 
Higgins. The Remuneration Committee report is set out below.

In light of the current composition of the executive leadership 
and the Board, the Board as a whole has retained overall 
responsibility for the review of the overall risk management 
processes and principles. The Board as a whole constitutes the 
Nomination Committee and will appoint a sub-committee if 
considered appropriate; the Board also determines remuneration 
for the Non-Executive Directors.

Executive Committee
The Company formed an Executive Committee in October 2018 to be 
the main decision-making body of the Company to ensure that key 
decisions are made in a timely manner with the best information 
available. The Executive Committee meets on a monthly basis and 
has six members: Christopher Richards chairs the Executive 
Committee and is joined by Zhongmin Wei (Chief Science Officer), 
Jeffrey Tweedy (Chief Operating Officer), Jeffrey Hovey (Chief 
Financial Officer), Christine Mazzone (General Counsel and Company 
Secretary) and Mark Turner (Director, Technology Licensing).

Board composition
The Company’s Board is currently comprised of 3 Non-executive 
Directors and 1 Executive Directors. The Chairman is non-independent.

The Audit Committee has two members, each of whom is an 
independent, non-executive director and at least one member 
who has recent and relevant financial experience. The current 
members of the committee are Michael Higgins as the Chairman 
and William Lewis. The Audit Committee report is set out below. 

Each Director serves on the Board from appointment until the next 
Annual General Meeting at which he or she stands for election. 
Thereafter he or she stands for re-election in accordance with 
the Company’s Articles of Association which is no less than once 
every three years.

Remuneration Committee
The purpose of the Remuneration Committee is to determine and 
agree with the Board regarding the framework or broad policy for 
the remuneration of the Company’s chairman and the executive 
directors as well as the composition of the board itself.

Some of the Remuneration Committee’s duties include:

•  reviewing the pay and employment conditions across the 

Company, including the Executives on the Board;

•  approving targets and performance related pay schemes 

operated by the Company and all share incentive plans and 
pension arrangements;

•  regularly reviewing the structure, size, and composition 

(including the skills, knowledge, experience and diversity) of 
the Board and make recommendations to the board with regard 
to any changes, succession planning and vacancies; and

•  identifying suitable candidates from a wide range of 

backgrounds to be considered for positions on the board.

Directors’ biographies are set out on page 23. The Board is 
responsible to its shareholders for the proper management of 
the Company and meets at least six times a year to set the overall 
direction and strategy of the Company, to review scientific, 
commercial, operational and financial performance and to advise 
on management appointments. All key operational and investment 
decisions are subject to Board approval. A summary of Board and 
Committee meetings held in the year ended 31 December 2018, 
and Directors’ attendance records, is set out on page 33.

The Board considers itself to be sufficiently independent. 
The QCA Code suggests that a board should have at least two 
independent Non-executive Directors. Two of the Non-executive 
Directors who currently sit on the Board of the Company are 
regarded as independent under the QCA Code’s guidance for 
determining such independence. Non-executive Directors 
receive their fees in the form of a basic cash fee. 

Concerns relating to the executive management of the Group or 
the performance of the Directors can be raised in confidence by 
contacting the Senior Independent Director, Michael Higgins, 
through the Company Secretary.

26

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018process when considering the adequacy of the composition of 
the Board and for succession planning. A new review is currently 
in process and will be concluded by the end of the second quarter.

Corporate Culture
The Board seeks to maintain the highest standards of integrity 
and ethics in the conduct of the Group’s operations. These values 
are exhibited in the written policies and working practices adopted 
by all employees in the Group. An open culture is encouraged 
within the Group, with regular communications to staff regarding 
progress and staff feedback regularly sought. Employees are 
expected to behave and to execute the Company’s strategy and 
objectives in an ethical, compliant manner as well as to ask 
questions and raise concerns openly. The Interim CEO and senior 
management team monitors the Group’s cultural environment 
and seeks to address any concerns that may arise, escalating 
these to Board level as necessary.

Michael J Higgins
Senior Independent Director
9 April 2019

Board Experience
The Board considers that all of the Non-executive Directors are 
of sufficient competence and calibre to add strength and objectivity 
to its activities, and bring considerable experience in scientific, 
commercial, operational and financial development of products 
and companies.

The Board regularly reviews the composition of the Board to ensure 
that it has the necessary breadth and depth of skills to support 
the ongoing development of the Company.

The Chairman, in conjunction with the Company Secretary, ensures 
that the Directors’ knowledge is kept up to date on key issues and 
developments pertaining to the Company, its operational 
environment and to the Directors’ responsibilities as members of 
the Board. During the course of the year, Directors received updates 
from the Company Secretary and various external advisers on a 
number of corporate governance matters. Furthermore the key 
commercial executives and the New Technology team regularly 
present at Board meetings and attend dinners with Board members. 
Also once a year the Board visits the Research and Development 
centre in Seattle and are briefed by the team.

The Board seeks advice from its external advisers as needed in 
the ordinary course of business and for exceptional circumstances, 
including its Nominated Adviser and outside counsel in the UK 
and USA as well as globally. There is an agreed procedure for 
Directors to take independent professional advice, if necessary, 
at the Company’s expense. This is in addition to the access which 
every Director has to the Company Secretary, who is charged by 
the Board with ensuring that Board procedures are followed. 
Directors’ service contracts or appointment letters make provision 
for a Director to seek personal advice in furtherance of his or her 
duties and responsibilities, normally via the Company Secretary.

Performance of the Board
The Board has a process for evaluation of its own performance, that 
of its committees and individual Directors, including the Chairman. 
This process is conducted on a regular basis and last took place in 
October 2017, with no substantive issues arising. Evaluation criteria 
include Board Composition, Strategy, Board Meetings, Training 
and Development, Governance, Risk, Company Secretary and 
Leadership. The Board may utilise the results of the evaluation 

27

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAudit Committee report

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The audit committee is a formally constituted sub-committee 
of the Board. The responsibilities of the committee include:

•  Reviewing the half yearly and full year accounts and results 
announcements and also any other formal announcements 
or statements issued with regard to the Group’s 
financial performance;

•  Reviewing the Group’s systems for internal financial control 

and risk management;

•  Monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s 

accounting function;

•  Considering the appointment of the external auditors 
overseeing the process for their selection and where 
appropriate making recommendations to the Board in relation 
to their appointment to be put, as required, to shareholders for 
approval at a general meeting;

•  Monitoring and reviewing the independence and effectiveness 
of the external auditors, agreeing the nature and scope of their 
audit, agreeing their remuneration, and considering their 
reports on the Group’s accounts, reports to shareholders and 
their assessment and evaluation of the systems of internal 
financial control and risk management.

Composition of the audit committee
The audit committee comprises Michael Higgins as chairman 
and William Lewis. The Committee meets separately with the 
external auditors without management present. The Secretary 
to the Committee is the Company Secretary.

Main activities of the audit committee
The audit committee meets formally three times a year: 
in September, to review and consider the half year results 
announcement; in December, together with the external auditors, 
it considers and approves the nature and scope of the annual audit; 
and then in late March or April it will receive reports from the 
external auditors on the conduct of their audit, and their review 
of the accounts, including accounting policies and areas of 
judgement, and their comments on risk management and control 
matters. The external auditors also present their fee proposals 
for the forthcoming annual audit at the December meeting.

Independence of external auditors
Both the Board and the external auditors have safeguards in 
place to avoid the possibility that the auditors’ objectivity and 
independence could be compromised. The policy in respect of 
services provided by external auditors is as follows:

•  Audit related services – the external auditors are invited to 

provide services which, in their position as auditors they must or 
are best placed to undertake. This includes formalities relating 
to shareholders and other circulars or any other regulatory 
reports or work in respect of acquisitions or disposals.

•  Tax consulting – in cases where they are best suited, we will 

use the external tax advisers.

•  General consulting – recognising the public concern over the 

issue of auditors’ independence, our policy is that the external 
auditors would not be used for general consulting work.

Internal management accounting
The audit committee considered the performance of the internal 
accounting function and the resource requirements available 
taking into account the size and complexity of the Group’s 
activities. Given the small size of the Board, the Board as a whole 
reviews the internal budgets and they are formally approved by the 
Board. The Board has concluded as a whole that these budgets are 
both properly prepared and based upon realistic assessments of 
the market opportunities in the context of the Group’s ambitions.

This report was approved by the Audit Committee and presented 
on its behalf by:

Michael J Higgins
Chairman of Audit Committee
9 April 2019

28

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Remuneration Committee report

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Remuneration Committee has two members, each of whom 
is an independent, non-executive director. The current members 
of the committee are William Lewis as the Chairman and 
Michael Higgins. The Committee is responsible for determining 
the contract terms, remuneration and other benefits of the 
Executive Directors including the Executive Chairman, and for 
monitoring the remuneration of first-line executive management. 
The Committee may call on outside compensation experts 
as required.

Remuneration policy
It is Group policy to set Directors’ remuneration levels to attract, 
incentivise and retain the quality of individuals that the Group 
requires to succeed in its chosen objectives. It is also Group 
policy to ensure that there is a strong link between the level of 
Executive Directors’ remuneration and the performance of the 
Group in achieving its goals. 

Elements of remuneration – Executive Directors
Executive Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer
The following comprised the principal elements of the Group’s 
Executive Directors remuneration during 2018:

•  basic salary and benefits;

•  annual bonus (performance-related and discretionary);

•  long-term share-based incentives; and

•  pension contributions.

In lieu of additional salary for his role as Interim Chief Executive 
Officer, Christopher Richards was granted share options in 2018 
which were tied to certain performance conditions.

(a) 2004 Unapproved Share Option Scheme
In July 2004, the Board adopted the Plant Health Care plc 
Unapproved Share Option Scheme 2004. Under this scheme, 
the Board could grant options at an exercise price of not less than 
the market value of a share on the date of award. Options may 
normally be exercised between three and 10 years from grant. 
In most cases, vesting is also dependent upon the option holder 
remaining an eligible employee. In 2014, the scheme reached the 
10th anniversary of its approval by shareholders; no further 
options may be granted. The Company was authorised to award 
options and shares under these plans up to the greater of 3% of 
its issued share capital or such number as, when aggregated 
with any outstanding options converted from the Plant Health 
Care, Inc. option plans from 1996 and 2001, amounts to no more 
than 10% of the issued share capital of the Company.

(b) 2015 Employee Share Option Plan
On 16 June 2015, the Company adopted the Plant Health Care plc 
2015 Employee Share Option Plan, or the EMI Plan, which 
provides for the grant of options to acquire the Company’s 
ordinary shares. Under the EMI Plan, the Company may grant 
enterprise management incentive options, known as EMI options, 

to eligible bona fide employees who qualify under applicable 
United Kingdom (“UK”) tax law, as well as options that do not 
qualify as EMI options, or NQOs. Vesting of options is subject 
to the performance conditions set out in the applicable option 
agreement and pursuant to the EMI Plan. The Board has the 
discretion and authority to set and measure the satisfaction of 
the performance conditions, which under the EMI Plan must be 
linked to the achievement of challenging financial performance 
over a period of at least three years, but no more than 10 years, 
from the date of grant and the enhancement of shareholder value. 
Performance conditions may be amended, relaxed or waived by 
the Board provided that any varied performance conditions 
would be a fairer measure of performance than the original 
performance conditions and are no more or no less difficult to 
satisfy than prior to the amendment. At any time, the total 
market value of the shares that can be acquired upon the 
exercise of all EMI options under the EMI Plan may not exceed 
£3 million. 

As part of the EMI Plan, the Board has adopted rules governing 
options awarded to the Company’s US employees, or the US 
Sub-plan to the EMI Plan. The US Sub-plan to the EMI Plan 
provides for grants of both incentive stock options qualifying 
under section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 
amended, and non-statutory stock options. The term of an 
incentive stock option may not exceed 10 years (subject to 
certain limitations with respect to any employee who owns more 
than 10% of the voting power of all classes of the Company’s 
outstanding ordinary shares). In the event the option holder 
ceases to be an employee before he or she exercises the vested 
portion of the option for any reason other than death, disability 
or by the employer for cause, the option shall expire three months 
after the date on which the option holder ceases to be an employee. 
In the event the option holder ceases to be an employee because 
of death or disability, the option holder, or his or her personal 
representative in the event of death, may exercise the vested 
portion of the option during the 12-month period following the 
date the option holder ceases to be an employee. In the event 
that the option holder’s employment is terminated for cause by 
the employer, the option will expire immediately upon the date 
employment is terminated.

On 16 June 2015, the Company also adopted the Plant Health Care 
plc 2015 Non-Employee Share Option Plan, or the Non-Employee 
Option Plan, that provides for the grant of options to acquire 
ordinary shares to eligible option holders who are not employees. 
As part of the Non-Employee Option Plan, the Board has adopted 
rules governing options awarded to individuals who are not 
employees, or the US Sub-plan to the Non-Employee Option Plan. 
This sub-plan provides for grants of non-statutory stock options. 
As of 31 December 2018, no awards were outstanding under 
the Non-Employee Option Plan or the US Sub-plan to the 
Non-Employee Option Plan.

29

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCERemuneration Committee report continued

Elements of remuneration – Executive Directors continued
(c) 2017 Employee Share Option Plan
On 19 May 2017, the Company adopted the Plant Health Care plc 
2017 Employee Share Option Plan, or the 2017 ESOP, which 
provides for the grant of options to acquire the Company’s 
ordinary shares. Under the 2017 ESOP, the Company may grant 
enterprise management incentive options, known as EMI options, 
to eligible bona fide employees who qualify under applicable 
United Kingdom (“UK”) tax law, as well as options that do not 
qualify as EMI options, or NQOs. Vesting of options is subject 
to any performance conditions set out in the applicable option 
agreement and pursuant to the EMI Plan. At any time, the total 
market value of the shares that can be acquired upon the exercise 
of all EMI options under the 2017 ESOP may not exceed £3 million. 

As part of the 2017 ESOP, the Board has adopted rules governing 
options awarded to the Company’s US employees, or the US 
Sub-plan to the 2017 ESOP. The US Sub-plan to the 2017 ESOP 
provides for grants of both incentive stock options qualifying under 
section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and 
non-statutory stock options. The term of an incentive stock option 
may not exceed 10 years (subject to certain limitations with respect 
to any employee who owns more than 10% of the voting power of all 
classes of the Company’s outstanding ordinary shares). 

(d) Options granted outside option schemes
The Company has granted options to acquire shares pursuant 
to separate unapproved option agreements to Michael Higgins, 
William Lewis and Dr. Richard Webb. Generally, the options may 
only be exercised while the option holder is a service provider 
to the Company. In the event that the option holder ceases to 
be a service provider as a result of injury, ill health or disability, 
upon the company for which the option holder works ceasing to 
be a member of the Group, or the transfer of the business that 
employs the option holder to a person that is not in the Group, the 
option may be exercised during the six-month period beginning 
on the date upon which the option holder is no longer a service 
provider to the Company. 

Shares allotted under these options rank equally with all other 
shares in the same class in issue at the date of allotment. If and 
for so long as the allotted shares are listed or traded on any stock 
exchange, the Company shall apply for the shares allotted under 
these options to be admitted to the relevant exchange. In the 
event of any capitalisation issue, rights issue, consolidation, 
sub-division, reduction or other variation of the Company’s share 
capital, the number and description of the shares subject to each 
option or the exercise price of each option shall be varied as the 
Board determines, provided that it considers such adjustment to 
be fair and appropriate. Limitations apply to the extent to which 
any such adjustment may reduce the price at which shares may 
be purchased pursuant to the exercise of an option and the 
exercise price for a share to be newly issued on the exercise 
of an option shall not be reduced below its nominal value.

Pension benefit 
United States employees were entitled to participate in the Plant 
Health Care, Inc. 401(k) Plan. This is a defined contribution plan 
approved by the US Internal Revenue Service. The main features 
of the plan are:

•  participation is open to all US-based employees who have 
completed a probationary period after initial employment;

•  employees may contribute a percentage of salary to the plan 

through a payroll withholding scheme;

•  in 2018, the Group continued to match contributions up to 3%. 
In 2017, the Group made matching contributions of up to 2% 
through September of 2017 and 3% thereafter of compensation 
to participating employees;

•  beginning in 2014, Group contributions vest immediately; and

•  the plan is subject to various statutory non-discrimination tests 

to ensure that it does not favour highly-compensated employees. 

Elements of remuneration — Non-executive Directors
During 2017 and 2018, the remuneration for non-executive 
Directors consisted of stock options and fees for their services 
in connection with the Board and Board committees. The 
Non-executive Directors receive their fees wholly in cash. 

Service contracts
During 2017 and 2018, the Company had service contracts 
with all Executive and Non-executive Directors.

Provisions in the service contracts of other Executive Directors 
(including the Executive Chairman/Interim Chief Executive 
Officer) include:

•  termination may be initiated by the Company or the Director 

at any time with three months’ written notice; 

•  the Company may also terminate the agreement with immediate 
effect by paying a sum in lieu of notice equal to the basic fixed 
salary the Director would have been entitled to receive during 
the notice period; and

•  the Company may also terminate the agreement with immediate 
effect at any time without notice or payment in lieu of notice 
for certain circumstances including gross misconduct 
affecting the business.

Provisions in the service contracts of Non-executive 
Directors include: 

•  each Director’s appointment may be terminated with no less 

than three months’ prior written notice; and

•  each Director’s appointment may also be terminated with 

immediate effect for certain circumstances including serious 
breach or repeated breach of any obligations to the Company; 
any act of fraud or dishonesty; or a declaration of bankruptcy. 

30

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Directors’ remuneration 
For the years ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2018, the table below sets forth the compensation paid to the Directors.

Executive:

Dr C Richards

Dr R Webb*

Non-executive:

M Higgins

W Lewis

Base salary
 and fees
$’000

Performance-
related
bonus
$’000

Other
benefits
$’000

Share 
option 
benefit
$’000

133

216

60

33

442

—

—

—

—

—

—

19

—

—

19

273

116

—

—

389

Total
2018
$’000

406

351

60

33

850

Total
2017
$’000

285

367

58

49

759

*  Dr Webb, who was previously Executive Director for New Technology, reverted to a Non-Executive role with effect from 1st January, 2019.

Other benefits
In 2018, the Group incurred $19,000 (2017: nil) of medical, dental and life insurance expense on behalf of one Director. 

Other information
During the year, the Company’s share price on AIM ranged between 6.5 and 27.0p. At 31 December 2018, the share price was 7.92p. 
At 9 April 2019, the last working day prior to the approval of this annual report, the share price was 6.4p. 

This report was approved by the Remuneration Committee and presented on its behalf by:

William M. Lewis
Chairman of Remuneration Committee
9 April 2019

31

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCEDirectors’ report

REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS

The Directors present their annual report together with the audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2018. See 
Note 19 for discussion of financial risk management objectives and policies, exposure to price, credit, liquidity and cash flow risk.

Results and dividends
The results of the Group for the year are set out on page 41 and show a loss for the year of $7,692,000 (2017: loss of $5,454,000).

The Directors recommend that no dividend be paid at this time (2017: nil). 

Directors
The beneficial interests of the Directors in the ordinary share capital of the Company and options to purchase ordinary shares of the 
Company as of 31 December 2018 were as follows:

Dr C Richards

Dr R Webb

M Higgins

W Lewis

At 31 December 2018

Shares

Options

1,638,253*

3,363,777

1,015,264

2,073,727

70,147

436,620

117,647

89,686

* 

Includes a beneficial interest of William Richards, a minor child of Dr. Christopher Richards, of 34,578 ordinary shares.

None of the Directors have any holding in any subsidiary company, nor any material interest in the transactions of the Group.

Substantial shareholders
On 9 April 2019, the Directors are aware of the following persons who, directly or indirectly, are interested in 3% or more of the 
Company’s existing ordinary share capital:

Name

Richard Griffiths

1798 Volantis

Boulder River Capital Corporation and its affiliates

Polar Capital Partners

Garraway Capital Management LLP

Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS)

Shares held

63,447,432

28,841,678

12,651,444

12,044,098

10,529,245

5,531,558

Percent of issued
share capital*

36.71

16.69

7.32

6.97

6.09

3.20

*  The percentages shown are based on the most recent share register analysis or notification.

Research and development
The Group continues to invest in R&D activities with an emphasis on the improvement of existing technologies, the formulation of 
products to meet specific customer needs and the development of proprietary Group’s biostimulants based on the Company’s Harpin 
platform technology. For further details of the Group’s R&D activities, see the Chairman’s letter and Strategic report on pages 8 to 21. 

Business review
For a discussion of the Group’s 2018 performance and future developments, see the Chairman’s letter and Strategic report on pages 8 to 21.

32

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Board meetings and attendance
The following table shows the attendance of Directors at meetings of the Board, Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee held 
during the 2018 financial year:

Number of meetings held

Dr C Richards

Dr R Webb

M Higgins

W Lewis

Board

Audit 
Committee

Remuneration
 Committee

6

6

6

6

6

3

—

—

3

3

3

3

—

3

3

Auditor
All of the Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the 
Company’s auditor for the purposes of its audit and to ensure that the auditor is aware of that information. The Directors are not 
aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditor is unaware. 

Going concern
In consideration of the Group’s current resources and review of financial forecasts and projections, the Directors have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least 12 months from the approval of 
the Annual Report. Various sensitivity analyses have been performed to reflect possible downside scenarios (for further details see 
page 21 of the Strategic Report). Even in the worst case scenario whereby the Group achieves reduced revenues for the twelve months 
following the date of this Annual Report, the Group has sufficient resources to continue in operational existence at least 12 months 
from approval of the annual report. No material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the ability of the Group to 
continue as a going concern have been identified by the Directors. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern 
basis in preparing the annual report and accounts.

Annual general meeting
At the forthcoming annual general meeting of the Company, resolutions will be put forward to re-elect Michael Higgins and 
Richard Webb as Directors and to re-appoint BDO LLP as the auditor of the Company. 

By order of the Board

Christine Mazzone
Company secretary
9 April 2019

33

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018CORPORATE GOVERNANCEStatement of Directors’ responsibilities

STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES

The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable 
law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the Directors 
have elected to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(“IFRSs”), as adopted by the European Union, and the Company financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom 
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable law). Under company law, 
the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the 
state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. The Directors are also 
required to prepare financial statements in accordance with the rules of the London Stock Exchange for companies 
trading securities on AIM. 

In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

•  state whether the group financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs, as adopted by the 
European Union and the Company financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable UK 
Accounting Standards, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis, unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company 

will continue in business. 

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the 
Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and the 
Group and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. 
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and the Group and hence for taking reasonable 
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. 

Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. 
Financial statements are published on the Company’s website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. 
The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility 
also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.

34

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

36   Independent auditor’s report
41 

 Consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income

42	 	Consolidated	statement	of	financial position
43   Consolidated statement of changes 

in equity

44	 Consolidated	statement	of	cash flows
45   Notes forming part of the Group 

financial statements

68	 	Company	statement	of	financial position
69	 	Company	statement	of	changes	in equity
70	 	Notes	forming	part	of	the	Company	

financial statements
IBC Directors and advisers

35

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIndependent auditor’s report 
to the members of Plant Health Care plc

Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of Plant Health Care plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the 
year ended 31 December 2018 which comprise the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement 
of financial position, the consolidated statement of changes in equity, the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company 
statement of financial position, the Company statement of changes in equity, and notes to the financial statements, including 
a summary of significant accounting policies. 

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law 
and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that 
has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting 
Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 102. ‘The Financial Reporting Standard in the United Kingdom and Republic 
of Ireland (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice)’.

In our opinion:

•  the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2018 

and of the Group’s loss for the year then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union;

•  the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 

Accounting Practice; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (“ISAs (UK”)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our 
report. We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to 
our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled 
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is 
sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 

Conclusions relating to going concern
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the ISAs (UK) require us to report to you where:

•  the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is not appropriate; or

•  the Directors have not disclosed in the financial statements any identified material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt 

about the Group’s or the Parent Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at least 
twelve months from the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

36

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial 
statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to 
fraud) we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the 
audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial 
statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Matter
Revenue recognition and adoption of IFRS 15: Revenue from 
Contracts with Customers (note 2 and 4)
The group has adopted the new revenue accounting standard 
(IFRS 15) from 1 January 2018.

This standard brings a new and detailed approach to accounting 
for revenue, with a more prescriptive framework and as such, 
significant emphasis has been placed on this transition throughout 
the audit.

The Group generates revenue primarily from the sale of 3rd party 
and proprietary products.

We considered there to be a significant audit risk arising from 
inappropriate or incorrect recognition of revenue where the 
Group makes sales under specific agreements and contracts. 
These sales contracts differ to ‘normal’ product sales in that the 
terms are more complex and the accounting therefore more 
susceptible to fraud / error.

The 3rd party sales contracts will frequently have several 
components such as protracted payment terms, multiple 
performance conditions and other rebate / support payments 
and financing components which need to be suitably considered 
and accounted for so as to ensure revenue is not recorded 
inaccurately / recognised prematurely.

Recoverability of trade receivables (note 16) 
The group has adopted the new financial instrument accounting 
standard (IFRS 9) from 1 January 2018.

IFRS 9 introduced a new impairment model based on expected 
credit losses. Under this approach the Group is required to 
consider both current conditions and forward looking 
information to estimate expected credit losses.

The Group has significant accounts receivable balances at the 
year end which are frequently provided credit terms in excess of 
90 days, extending in some instances to greater than 12 months. 
As the Group has extended into new markets and is working with 
new distributors with whom they have limited payment history 
this makes assessment of the expected credit losses particularly 
judgemental.

How we addressed the matter in our audit

We assessed whether the revenue recognition policies adopted 
by the Group comply with IFRS as adopted by the European Union 
and Industry Standard. The relevant IFRS is International 
Financial Reporting Standard 15 Revenue from Contracts 
with Customers. 

Furthermore, we have performed specific testing as set out below;

•  A sample of sales contracts subject to additional contractual 

terms transacted during the year were reviewed in conjunction 
with management’s proposed accounting treatment and we 
assessed whether the terms under the contract had been 
fulfilled and the revenue appropriately recognised.

•  Where the contracts are inclusive of a significant financing 
component, rebates / marketing support payments, we have 
tested a sample and agreed the estimations made by management 
to supporting information (historical, current and forecast) to 
check that the amount of revenue recognised is appropriate.

•  Cut-off procedures including testing invoices raised in 
December 2018 and January 2019 to check revenue has 
been recorded within the correct period.

We have further reviewed the requirements of the IFRS 15 
transition and reviewed the assessment of expected impacts. 
There has been no impact to adopting the new standard to the 
brought forward balances. We have reviewed the enhanced 
financial statement disclosures to check that they are in 
accordance with the requirements of the standard.

Where funds have been collected post year end we have reviewed 
evidence of the bank receipts and for balances subject to payment 
plans we have checked that receipts are in accordance with 
these plans.

In instances where balances are not yet due or have deviated from 
their payment plan we have reviewed management’s impairment 
assessment which included review of historical payment patterns 
and consideration of both the 12 month expected credit losses 
and lifetime expected credit losses as appropriate. 

We completed sensitivity analysis over the key variables within 
the expected credit loss provision calculated by management. 

We have further reviewed the requirements of the IFRS 9 
transition and reviewed the assessment of expected impacts. 
There has been no impact of adopting the new standard to the 
brought forward balances. We have reviewed the enhanced 
financial statement disclosures to check that they are in 
accordance with the requirements of the standard. 

37

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIndependent auditor’s report 
to the members of Plant Health Care plc continued

Key audit matters continued

Matter
Going Concern (note 2) 
The Directors have prepared detailed profit and loss and 
cashflow forecasts to December 2020 that indicate the Group 
has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its liabilities as 
they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of 
approval of the financial statements. 

The calculations supporting the going concern assessment 
require the Directors to make significant judgements. 

Impairment review of the Company investment value 
(note 33)
The Directors’ have used a value in use calculation to assess 
the recoverability of the investment in the Plant Health Care 
subsidiaries carried on the Parent Company balance sheet.

There is significant judgement involved in the estimation 
of the recoverable amount of the fixed asset investment.

How we addressed the matter in our audit

Our audit procedures included the following:

•  Review of the internal forecasting process to confirm the 

projections are prepared by an appropriate level of staff that is 
aware of the detailed figures included in the forecast but also 
has a high level understanding of the entity’s market, strategy 
and changes in the customer base.

•  Review of the forecasts prepared and challenge of the key 

assumptions and inputs within the model so as to determine 
whether there is adequate support for the assumptions 
underlying the forecasts.

•  The Directors have applied downwards sensitivities to the 
more variable aspects of the forecasts and also modelled a 
number of mitigating cash saving initiatives. 

We have considered the appropriateness of the sensitivities 
applied and confirmed that they have suitably addressed the 
inputs which are most susceptible to change. We have also 
considered the feasibility of each of the possible expenditure 
reductions identified.

•  Review of post year end management accounts, specifically 

comparing the cash position against that budgeted. 

•  Made inquiries of management as to their knowledge of events 
or conditions beyond the period of their assessment that may 
cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a 
going concern. 

•  Considered the adequacy of the disclosures in the financial 

statements against the requirements of the accounting standards.

We have considered whether the methodology applied to value 
the recoverable amount of the investment is appropriate.

We have also reviewed the outcome of the accounting estimate 
included in the prior period financial statements.

Our procedures over the value in use model then included;

•  Agreement of the forecast figures included within the model 

to the Board approved forecasts.

•  Review and challenge of the assumptions underpinning the 
forecasts and the other inputs into the value in use model. 
This included a recalculation of the discount rate applied.

Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. 
We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions 
of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the financial statements. In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the 
probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality, performance materiality, to determine the extent 
of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take 
account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their 
effect on the financial statements as a whole.

Level of materiality applied and rationale
We determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole to be $270,000 (2017 – $300,000) which represents 5% of loss 
before tax excluding non-recurring items (2017 – 5% loss before tax). We used loss before tax as a benchmark as this is a primary KPI 
used to address the performance of the business by the Board.

Materiality for the parent company was set at $135,000 (2017 – $150,000).

Individual component audits were carried out using component materialities of between 14 – 50% of overall financial statement materiality.

38

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Level of materiality applied and rationale continued
Performance materiality is the application of materiality at the individual account or balance level set at an amount to reduce to an 
appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the 
financial statements as a whole. Performance materiality was set at 75% (2017 – 75%) of materiality. In setting the level of performance 
materiality we considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements (based on past 
experience and other factors) and management’s attitude towards proposed adjustments. 

We agreed with the Audit Committee that misstatements in excess of $13,500 (2017: $15,000), which are identified during the audit, 
would be reported to them, as well as smaller misstatements that in our view must be reported on qualitative grounds

An overview of the scope of our audit
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements 
as a whole, taking into account the geographic structure of the Group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in 
which the Group operates. 

In establishing the overall approach to the Group audit, we assessed the audit significance of each reporting unit in the Group by 
reference to both its financial significance and other indicators of audit risk, such as the complexity of operations and the degree 
of estimation and judgement in the financial results. 

Classification of components
The Group is comprised of 2 UK companies (including Plant Health Care plc) and 4 significant international components.

A full scope statutory audit was completed for the UK subsidiary. 

BDO Mexico were engaged to perform a full scope audit for group reporting purposes of the financial information of Plant Health Care 
de Mexico. We instructed BDO Mexico as to the scope and timing of their work on the financial information for group reporting 
purposes, we met with the audit team to review their audit documentation and findings. 

Work on remaining components was completed by BDO UK. This was inclusive of visits to both the US and Spanish locations so as to 
ensure we obtained a full understanding of the operational activities, met with management and appropriately scoped risks. Our work 
on the Brazilian component was completed remotely.

We ensured that audit teams both at group and at component level have the appropriate skills and competencies which are needed to 
perform the audit.

Other information
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual 
Report and Financial Statements, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial 
statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express 
any form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider 
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, 
we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of 
the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other 
information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:

•  the information given in the strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are 

prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and

•  the strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course of 
the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the Directors’ report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you 
if, in our opinion:

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not 

visited by us; or

•  the Parent Company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

•  certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or 

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

39

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIndependent auditor’s report 
to the members of Plant Health Care plc continued

Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 34, the Directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control 
as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of 
accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no 
realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is 
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be 
expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s 
website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required 
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this 
report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Iain Henderson (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor 
55 Baker Street, 
London, W1U 7EU
9 April 2019

BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).

40

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
for the year ended 31 December 2018

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Research and development expenses

Business development expenses

Sales and marketing expenses

Administrative expenses

Operating loss

Finance income

Finance expense

Loss before tax

Income tax credit

Loss for the year attributable to the equity holders of the parent company

Other comprehensive income:

Items which will or may be reclassified to profit or loss:

Exchange difference on translation of foreign operations

Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable to the equity holders 
of the parent company 

Basic and diluted loss per share

The notes on pages 45 to 67 form part of these consolidated financial statements.

Note

4

5

10

10

11

2018
$’000

8,128

2017
$’000

7,685

(2,857)

(2,953)

5,271

(4,090)

(501)

4,732

(5,127)

(623)

(3,154)

(2,995)

(5,559)

(8,033)

(1,788)

(5,801)

90

(1)

87

(2)

(7,944)

(5,716)

252

262

(7,692)

(5,454)

1,120

(1,282)

(6,572)

(6,736)

12

$(0.05)

$(0.04)

41

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSConsolidated statement of financial position
at 31 December 2018

Assets

Non-current assets

Intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment

Trade and other receivables

Total non-current assets

Current assets

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Tax receivable

Investments

Cash and cash equivalents

Total current assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Current liabilities

Trade and other payables

Finance leases

Total current liabilities

Total liabilities

Total net assets

Share capital

Share premium

Foreign exchange reserve

Accumulated deficit

Total equity

Note

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

13

14

16

15

16

19

17

18

21

22

22

22

1,692

1,898

701

140

968

134

2,533

3,000

2,975

3,357

400

1,825

2,459

11,016

13,549

1,536

4,311

377

2,719

1,175

10,118

13,118

2,404

2,879

—

2,404

2,404

11,145

2,586

8

2,887

2,887

10,231

2,237

86,126

79,786

731

(389)

(78,298)

(71,403)

11,145

10,231

The consolidated financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board on 9 April 2019.

Christopher Richards
Director

Registered no: 05116780 (England and Wales)

The notes on pages 45 to 67 form part of these consolidated financial statements. 

42

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Consolidated statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December 2018

Balance at 1 January 2017

Loss for the year

Exchange difference arising on translation of foreign operations

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Shares issued

Share-based payments

Options exercised

Balance at 31 December 2017

Loss for the year

Exchange difference arising on translation of foreign operations

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

Shares issued 

Share-based payments

Options exercised

Share 
capital
$’000

2,237

Share 
premium
$’000

79,786

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Foreign
exchange
reserve
$’000

Accumulated 
deficit
$’000

Total 
$’000

893

(66,885)

16,031

—

(5,454)

(5,454)

(1,282)

—

(1,282)

(1,282)

(5,454)

(6,736)

—

—

—

—

936

—

—

936

—

2,237

79,786

(389)

(71,403)

10,231

—

—

—

—

—

—

349

6,340

—

—

—

—

—

(7,692)

(7,692)

1,120

1,120

—

—

—

—

1,120

(7,692)

(6,572)

—

797

—

6,689

797

—

Balance at 31 December 2018

2,586

86,126

731

(78,298)

11,145

The notes on pages 45 to 67 form part of these consolidated financial statements.

43

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSConsolidated statement of cash flows
for the year ended 31 December 2018

Cash flows from operating activities

Loss for the year

Adjustments for:

Depreciation

Amortisation of intangibles

Share-based payment expense

Finance income

Finance expense

Foreign exchange on intercompany

Income taxes credit

Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables

Gain on disposal of fixed assets

Increase in inventories

(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

Income taxes received/(paid)

Net cash used in operating activities

Investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

Sale of property, plant and equipment

Finance income

Purchase of investments

Sale of investments

Net cash provided by investing activities

Financing activities

Finance expense

Issue of ordinary share capital

Repayment of finance lease principal

Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period

*  See note 26.

The notes on pages 45 to 67 form part of these consolidated financial statements.

Note

2018
$’000

Restated *
2017
$’000

(7,692)

(5,454)

14

13

10

10

26

14

10

10

382

206

797

(90)

1

1,120

(252)

961

(7)

(1,439)

(475)

216

393

264

936

(87)

2

(1,261)

(262)

(1,024)

(4)

(291)

771

(121)

(6,272)

(6,138)

(115)

(125)

7

90

4

87

(3,994)

(2,258)

4,887

875

4,888

2,596

(1)

6,689

(7)

6,681

1,284

1,175

2,459

(2)

—

(8)

(10)

(3,552)

4,727

1,175

44

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2018

1. General information
Plant Health Care plc (the ‘‘Company’’) is a public limited company incorporated in England and Wales. The address of its registered 
office is 1 Scott Place, 2 Hardman Street, Manchester M3 3AA. The Company and its subsidiaries (together, the ‘‘Group’’) is a leading 
provider of proprietary agricultural biological products and technology solutions focused on improving crop performance by 
activating a growth response and bolstering plant defence mechanisms against both abiotic and biotic stresses. The principal 
markets of the Company and its subsidiaries are described in Note 9.

2. Accounting policies
Reporting currency
The financial statements are presented in thousands of US Dollars. The exchange rates used to convert British Pounds to US Dollars 
at 31 December 2018 and 2017 were 1.2734 and 1.3491, respectively, and the average exchange rate for the years then ended were 
1.3348 and 1.2885, respectively.

The functional currency of the parent company is US Dollars.

Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, 
International Accounting Standards and Interpretations (collectively “IFRSs”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board 
(“IASB”) and as adopted by the European Union and those parts of the Companies Act 2006 which apply to companies preparing their 
financial statements under IFRSs.

Amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise stated.

Going concern
In assessing whether the going concern basis is an appropriate basis for preparing the 2018 Annual Report, the Directors have utilised 
its detailed forecasts which take into account its current and expected business activities, its cash and cash equivalents balance and 
investments of $4.3 million as shown in its balance sheet at 31 December 2018, the principal risks and uncertainties the Group faces 
and other factors impacting the Group’s future performance.

Various sensitivity analyses have been performed to reflect possible downside scenarios as referred to above. Even in the worst case 
scenario whereby the Group achieves reduced revenues for the twelve months following the date of this Annual Report, the Group has 
sufficient resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. In order to provide sufficient headroom the Directors 
have identified costs savings associated with the reduction in revenues and have the ability to identify further cost savings if necessary.

Basis of measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for financial instruments designated 
at fair value through the profit and loss.

The principal accounting policies are set out below. The policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented and on 
a going concern basis. 

New standards impacting the Group that have been adopted in the annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2018, 
and which have given rise to changes in the Group’s accounting policies are:

•  IFRS 9 Financial Instruments; and

•  IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Details of the impact of these two standards are given below. 

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 has replaced IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and has had an effect on the Group in the following area:

•  The impairment provision on financial assets measured at amortised cost (such as trade and other receivables) have been calculated 
in accordance with IFRS 9’s expected credit loss model, which differs from the incurred loss model previously required by IAS 39. 
This has not resulted in a material change to the impairment provision at 1 January 2018. Details of how the Group have applied the 
credit loss model are set out in note 16.

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contract with Customers
•  IFRS 15 has replaced IAS 18 Revenue and IAS 11 Construction Contracts as well as various Interpretations previously issued by the 

IFRS Interpretations Committee, noting the Group has adopted the modified retrospective approach.

The Group has reviewed and refined its revenue recognition policy in accordance with the new accounting standard. As part of this 
review the Group now recognises any marketing support payments provided in conjunction with sales contracts as a reduction to 
revenue (previously recorded as marketing expenditure, however payments made under these initiatives in prior years were 
immaterial such that no adjustment to opening reserves has been recorded).

Additional disclosure has also been provided regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows.

Standards, amendments and interpretations to published standards not yet effective
There are a number of new standards and amendments to and interpretations of existing standards which have been published 
and are not yet mandatory and which the Group has decided not to adopt early.

A summary of these standards is given in Note 25 to the financial statements.

45

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2. Accounting policies continued
Basis of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Group and the entities controlled by the Group. 
Control exists when the Group has (i) power over the investee, (ii) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the 
investee, and (iii) the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s returns. The financial statements 
of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control 
ceases. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, revenues and expenses have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the results of business combinations using the purchase method. In the 
consolidated statement of financial position, the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are initially 
recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. The results of acquired operations are included in the statement of 
comprehensive income from the date on which control is obtained. They are deconsolidated from the date control ceases.

Revenue
The Group recognises revenue at the fair value of consideration received or receivable. Sales of goods to external customers are 
at invoiced amounts less value-added tax or local tax on sales. The Group currently generates revenue solely within its Commercial 
business through the sale of its proprietary and third-party products, as well as from granting certain licenses for the use of its 
intellectual property. Credit terms provided to customers also affects the recognition of revenue where a significant financing 
component is considered to exist.

The majority of the Group’s revenue is derived from selling goods with revenue recognised at a point in time when control of the goods 
has transferred to the customer. This is generally when the goods are delivered to the customer. However, for some sales, control 
might also be transferred when delivered either to the port of departure or port of arrival, depending on the specific terms of the 
contract with a customer. There is minimal judgement needed in identifying the point control passes to the customer: once physical 
delivery of the products to the agreed location has occurred, the group no longer has physical possession, usually will have a present 
right to payment (as a single payment on delivery) and retains none of the significant risks and rewards of the goods in question.

In the limited situations where the Group offers a product rebate to the customer, it records the fair value of the product rebate as a 
reduction to product revenue. An accrued liability for these product rebates is estimated and recorded at the time the revenues are recorded.

License/milestone payment income is recognised when the Group has no remaining obligations to perform under a non-cancellable 
contract which permits the user to act freely under the terms of the agreement and the collection of the resulting receivable is 
reasonably assured. To date the Group has not achieved the performance obligations for any milestone payments.

Sales support payments to customers are considered a reduction in transaction price and are recognised as a reduction to revenue 
as incurred. 

Goodwill
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and 
contingent liabilities, plus any direct costs of acquisition for acquisitions before 1 January 2010. For business combinations 
completed on or after 1 January 2010, direct costs of acquisition are recognised immediately as an expense.

Goodwill is capitalised as an intangible asset with any impairment in carrying value being charged to administrative expenses in the 
consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The Group performs annual impairment tests for goodwill at the financial year end.

Other intangible assets
Externally-acquired intangible assets are initially recognised at cost and subsequently amortised on a straight-line basis over their 
useful economic lives. The amortisation expense is included within administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income. 

Intangible assets are recognised on business combinations if they are separable from the acquired entity or give rise to contractual 
or other legal rights, and are initially recognised at their fair value.

Expenditure on internally-developed intangible assets (development costs) are capitalised if it can be demonstrated that:

•  it is technically feasible to develop the product for it to be sold;

•  adequate resources are available to complete the development;

•  there is an intention to complete and sell the product;

•  the Group is able to sell the product;

•  sale of the product will generate future economic benefits; and 

•  expenditure on the project can be measured reliably.

Development expenditure not satisfying the above criteria and expenditure on the research phase of internal projects are recognised 
in profit or loss.

Capitalised development costs are amortised over the periods of the future economic benefit attributable to the asset. The amortisation 
expense is included within administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The Group has not 
capitalised any development costs to date.

46

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 20182. Accounting policies continued
Other intangible assets continued
The significant intangibles recognised by the Group and their estimated useful economic lives are as follows:

Licences 
Registrations  

— 
— 

12 years  
 5 – 10 years

Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets
Impairment tests on goodwill are undertaken annually at the financial year end. Other non-financial assets are subject to impairment 
tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Where the carrying 
value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount (that is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell), the asset is written 
down accordingly.

Impairment charges are included within administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. 
An impairment loss recognised for goodwill is not reversed.

Foreign currency
Foreign currency transactions of individual companies are translated into the individual company’s functional currency at the rate 
on the date the transaction occurs. 

At the year end, non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end rate with the differences being 
recognised in the profit or loss.

On consolidation, the results of operations that have a functional currency other than US Dollars are translated into US Dollars 
at rates approximating to those ruling when the transactions took place. Statements of financial position are translated at the 
rate ruling at the end of the financial period. Exchange differences arising on translating the opening net assets at opening rate 
and the results of operations that have a functional currency other than US Dollars at average rate are included within “other 
comprehensive income” in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and taken to the foreign exchange reserve 
within capital and reserves.

Operating segments
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Group’s chief operating decision 
maker (CODM). The CODM, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has 
been identified as the Chief Executive Officer.

Financial instruments
Trade receivables collectable within one year from the date of invoicing are recognised at invoice value less provision for expected 
credit losses. Trade receivables collectable after more than one year from the date of invoicing are initially recognised at fair value, 
and subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment. 

Investments comprise short-term investments in notes and bonds having investment grade ratings. Investments are designated as at 
fair value through profit and loss upon initial recognition when they form part of a group of financial assets which is actively managed 
and evaluated by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance with the Company’s documented investment strategy 
that seeks to improve the rate of return earned by the Company on its excess cash while providing unrestricted access to the funds. 
The Company’s investments are carried at fair value as determined by quoted prices on active markets, with changes in fair values 
recognised through profit or loss.

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits and other short-term highly liquid investments that are readily 
convertible to a known amount of cash and are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value.

Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective 
interest method.

The Group applies both the simplified and general approaches under IFRS 9 to measure expected credit losses using a lifetime expected 
credit loss provision for trade receivables. Under the simplified approach, expected credit losses on a collective basis, trade receivables 
are grouped based on credit risk and ageing. Under the general approach, trade receivables that have payment terms over 180 day 
are reviewed. 

The expected loss rates are based on the Group’s historical credit losses experienced over the three year period prior to the period end. 
The historical loss rates are then adjusted for current and forward-looking information on factors affecting the Group’s customers.

Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. The Group’s ordinary 
shares are classified as equity instruments.

Employee benefits
The Group maintains a number of defined contribution pension schemes for certain of its employees; the Group does not contribute 
to any defined benefit pension schemes. The amount charged to profit or loss represents the employer contributions payable to the 
schemes for the financial period.

The expected costs of all short-term employee benefits, including short-term compensated absences, are recognised during the 
period the employee service is rendered.

47

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS2. Accounting policies continued
Equity share-based payments
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which it receives services from employees and 
non-employees as consideration for the Group’s equity instruments, in the form of options or restricted stock units (‘‘awards’’). 
The fair value of the award is recognised as an expense, measured as of the grant date using a binomial option pricing model. The 
total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of instruments granted, excluding the impact of any service 
and non-market performance vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of 
options that are expected to vest. The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is typically the period over which 
all of the specified vesting conditions are to be met.

Leased assets: lessee
Where assets are financed by leasing agreements that give rights approximating to ownership (finance leases), the assets are treated 
as if they had been purchased outright. The amount capitalised is the lower of fair value and present value of the minimum lease 
payments payable over the term of the lease. The corresponding lease commitments are shown as amounts payable to the lessor. 
Depreciation on the relevant assets is recognised in profit or loss over the shorter of useful economic life and lease term.

Lease payments are analysed between capital and interest components. The interest element of the payment is charged to income 
over the period of the lease and is calculated so that it represents a constant proportion of the balances of capital repayments 
outstanding. The capital element reduces the amounts payable to the lessor.

All other leases are treated as operating leases. Their annual rentals are charged to income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Property, plant and equipment
Items of property, plant and equipment are initially recognised at cost. Cost includes the purchase price and costs directly attributable 
to bringing the asset into operation. Depreciation is provided to write off the cost, less estimated residual values, of all property, plant 
and equipment over their expected useful lives. 

It is calculated at the following rates:

Production machinery 
Office equipment 
Vehicles 
Leasehold improvements 

— 
— 
— 
— 

10 – 20% per annum 
20 – 33% per annum 
20% per annum 
25% per annum

Inventories
Inventories are initially recognised at cost, and subsequently at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is based upon a 
weighted average cost method. The Group compares the cost of inventory to its net realisable value and writes down inventory to its 
net realisable value, if lower than its cost. Cost comprises all costs of purchase and all other costs of conversion. Net realisable value 
is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The inventory provision is 
based on which products have been determined to be obsolete.

Taxation
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income arising in the period reported on, calculated using tax rates relevant 
to the financial period.

Companies within the group may be entitled to claim special tax allowances in relation to qualifying research and development 
expenditure (e.g. R&D tax credits). The Group accounts for such allowances as tax credits which means they are recognised when 
it is probable that the benefit will flow to the group and that the benefit can be reliably measured. R&D tax credits reduce current 
tax expense and to the extent the amounts are due in respect of them and not settled by the balance sheet date, reduce current 
tax payable.

Deferred tax
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised where the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the statement of financial 
position differs from its tax base, except for differences on:

•  the initial recognition of goodwill;

•  the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which is not a business combination and at the time of the transaction 

affects neither accounting nor taxable profit; and

•  investments in subsidiaries and joint arrangements where the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the difference 

and it is probable that the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Recognition of deferred tax assets is restricted to those instances where it is probable that taxable profit will be available against 
which the difference can be utilised.

The amount of the asset or liability is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the 
financial period and are expected to apply when the deferred tax liabilities/(assets) are settled/(recovered).

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the Group has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities 
and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and 
liabilities on a net basis. 

48

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 20183. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
In preparing its financial statements, the Group makes certain estimates and judgements regarding the future. Estimates and 
judgements are continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that 
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the future, actual experience may differ from estimates and assumptions. 
The estimates and judgements that have a risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities 
within the next financial year are discussed below.

Revenue
The Group recognises revenue at the fair value of consideration received or receivable. Sales of goods to external customers are 
at invoiced amounts less value-added tax or local tax on sales. The Group currently generates revenue solely within its Commercial 
business through the sale of its proprietary and third-party products, as well as from granting certain licenses for use of its intellectual 
property. When the Group makes product sales under contracts / agreements which may be inclusive of additional performance 
obligations, different payment terms and associated rebate or support payments judgement can be required in the assessment 
of the transaction price.

Impairment of goodwill
The Group tests whether goodwill has suffered any impairment on an annual basis. The recoverable amount is determined based 
on value-in-use calculations. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows and the choice of a discount rate 
in order to calculate the present value of the cash flows. Actual outcomes may vary. Additional information on carrying values is 
included in note 13.

Impairment of intangible assets (excluding goodwill)
At the end of the financial period, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its definite lived intangible assets to determine whether 
there is any indication that those assets have suffered any impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount 
of the asset is estimated to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). 

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future 
cash flows are discounted to their net present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the 
time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to 
its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately within administrative expenses in the consolidated statement 
of comprehensive income. Additional information on carrying values is included in note 13.

Recoverability of trade receivables
The Group applies both the simplified and general approaches under IFRS 9 to measure expected credit losses using a lifetime expected 
credit loss provision for trade receivables. Under the simplified approach, expected credit losses on a collective basis, trade receivables 
are grouped based on credit risk and ageing. Given the Group has a low history of default limited judgement is required for trade 
receivables in this grouping.

The Group then separately reviews those receivables with payment terms over 180 days using the general approach. Under this 
approach judgements are required in the assessment of the risk and probability of credit losses and the quantum of the loss in the 
event of a default. The Group has debtors with a gross value (before provisioning but after the assessment of financing components) 
of $1.3 million within this grouping.

4. Revenue

Revenue arises from:

Proprietary products

Third-party products

Total

2018
$’000

5,581

2,547

8,128

2017
$’000

5,344

2,341

7,685

The following table gives an analysis of revenue according to sales with payment terms of less than or more than 180 days:

Year to 31 December 2018:

Segment

Mexico

Americas

Rest of World

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms less 
than 180 days
($’000)

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms greater 
than 180 days
($’000)

3,127

3,270

769

7,166

—

—

962

962

Total
($’000)

3,127

3,270

1,731

8,128

49

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS4. Revenue continued

Timing of transfer of goods

Point in time (delivery to port of departure)

Point in time (delivery to port of arrival)

Year to 31 December 2017:

Segment

Mexico

Americas

Rest of World

Timing of transfer of goods

Point in time (delivery to port of departure)

Point in time (delivery to port of arrival)

Financing component of sales contracts

At 1 January 2018

Financing components recognised

Financing components unwound to the income statement

At 31 December 2018

5. Operating loss

Operating loss is arrived at after charging/(crediting):

Share-based payment charge 

Depreciation 

Amortisation of intangibles

Operating lease expense

Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment

Impairment of trade receivables

Employee termination costs

Foreign exchange losses/gains

Auditor’s remuneration:

Amounts for audit of parent company and consolidation

Amounts for audit of subsidiaries

Total auditor’s remuneration

50

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms less 
than 180 days
($’000)

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms greater 
than 180 days
($’000)

7,079

87

7,166

282

680

962

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms less 
than 180 days
($’000)

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms greater 
than 180 days
($’000)

2,880

444

1,139

4,463

—

1,155

2,067

3,222

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms less 
than 180 days
($’000)

Sales contracts 
with payment 
terms greater 
than 180 days
($’000)

4,157

306

4,463

1,278

1,944

3,222

Total
($’000)

7,361

767

8,128

Total
($’000)

2,880

1,599

3,206

7,685

Total
($’000)

5,435

2,250

7,685

($’000)

—

324

(20)

304

Note

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

8

14

13

797

382

206

420

(7)

174

308

936

393

264

446

(4)

—

228

1,485

(1,432)

95

41

136

79

34

113

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 20186. Staff costs
Staff costs for all employees, including Executive Directors, comprise:

Wages and salaries

Social security and payroll taxes

Defined contribution pension costs

Medical and other benefits

Redundancy 

Share-based payments charge

The average number of employees of the Group during the year, including Executive Directors, was as follows:

Research

Development

Administration

Sales and marketing

2018
$’000

4,082

363

71

260

308

5,084

797

5,881

2018

9

1

8

19

37

2017
$’000

3,910

326

58

275

228

4,797

936

5,733

2017

12

2

7

16

37

7. Directors’ and key management personnel remuneration
Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling activities of 
the Group, and includes only the Directors of the Company. Further disclosures on the remuneration of each individual Director are 
included in the Directors’ remuneration section of the Remuneration Committee report on pages 29 to 31.

Base salary, fees and bonuses

Other short-term employee benefits

Share-based payments

Social security and taxes

2018
$’000

442

19

389

56

906

2017
$’000

421

—

338

45

804

No Executive Directors who served during the year were eligible to participate in the Group’s 401(k) retirement plan (2017: $nil).

The highest-paid Director earned $234,000 (2017: $200,000) consisting of an annual salary, a $16,000 bonus payout (2017: nil) 
and $19,000 (2017: nil) of other benefits. 

8. Share-based payments
The Company operates three equity-settled share-based remuneration schemes for employees: a share option scheme and two 
employee share option plans, as described in the “Elements of remuneration” section for Executive Directors within the Remuneration 
Committee report on pages 29 to 31.

(a) Share options
In June 2004, the Company approved the 2004 Unapproved Share Option Scheme (the ‘‘Option Plan’’). The Option Plan provides for the 
issuance of options for ordinary share capital of the Group to all eligible employees.

In 2014, the scheme reached the 10th anniversary of its approval by shareholders and no further options may be granted under the 
Option Plan.

In addition, in limited instances, the Company has granted options to certain management for ordinary share capital of the Company 
under separate unapproved option agreements.

(b) 2015 Employee Share Option Plan
In June 2015, the Board approved the 2015 Employee Share Option Plan and the 2015 Non-Employee Share Option Plan (the ‘‘Plans’’). 
The Plans provide for the issuance of options for ordinary share capital of the Company to both employees and non-employees. 
The 2015 Employee Share Option Plan provides for the grant of both enterprise management incentive (“EMI“) options as well as 
non-qualifying options (“NQO”). No share options were granted under this scheme in 2018.

51

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS8. Share-based payments continued
(b) 2015 Employee Share Option Plan continued
The valuation of the awards granted under the 2015 Employee Share Option Plan during the year ended 31 December 2017 were as follows:

Share options granted

Weighted average fair value

Assumptions used in measuring fair value:

Weighted average share price

Exercise price

Risk-free rate

Expected vesting period (years)

Option life (years)

Expected volatility

Expected dividend rate

6 February
2017

4,285,132

7p

17p

20p

0.44%

1.0 – 3.0

10.0

60.0%

0.0%

The valuation of the share options granted during the year ended 31 December 2017 was as follows:

•  the weighted average share price and the expected volatility were determined by reference to the share price of Plant Health 

Care plc on AIM and the historical share price of Plant Health Care plc on AIM for the applicable expected vesting period, 
respectively; and

•  the expected vesting period reflects market-based performance conditions for these options: 

• 

 One-third of options are exercisable when the arithmetic mean closing price of the shares over 60 trading days exceeds 25p since 
the grant date;

•  One-third of options are exercisable when the arithmetic mean closing price of the shares over 60 trading days exceeds 40p since 

the grant date; and

•  One-third of options are exercisable when the arithmetic mean closing price of the shares over 60 trading days exceeds 50p since 

the grant date.

(c) 2017 Employee Share Option Plan
In May 2017, the Board approved the 2017 Employee Share Option Plan. The plan provides for the issuance of options for ordinary share 
capital of the Company to both employees and non-employees. The 2017 Employee Share Option Plan provides for the grant of both 
enterprise management incentive (“EMI“) options as well as non-qualifying options (“NQO”).

The valuation of the awards granted under the 2017 Employee Share Option Plan during the years ended 31 December 2017 and 
31 December 2018 were as follows:

Share options granted

Weighted average fair value

Assumptions used in measuring fair value:

Weighted average share price

Exercise price

Risk-free rate

Expected vesting period (years)

Option life (years)

Expected volatility

Expected dividend rate

19 May 
2017

10 July 
2017

25 May
 2018

2,842,788

3,936,920

5,627,716

12p

27p

26p

14p

28p

25p

12p

24p

24p – 50p

0.28%

0.61%

0.98%

1.0 – 3.0

1.0 – 3.0

1.0 – 3.0

10.0

60.0%

0.0%

10.0

60.0%

0.0%

10.0

60.0%

0.0%

The valuation of the share options granted during the year ended 31 December 2018 was as follows:

•  the weighted average share price and the expected volatility were determined by reference to the share price of Plant Health Care plc 

on AIM and the historical share price of Plant Health Care plc on AIM for the applicable expected vesting period, respectively; and

•  the expected vesting period reflects performance conditions for these options. 

Additional details of share-based payments are provided in note 21.

52

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 20189. Segment information
The Group’s CODM views, manages and operates the Group’s business segments according to its strategic business focuses —Commercial 
and New Technology. The CODM further analyses the results and operations of the Group’s Commercial business on a geographical basis; 
and therefore the Group has presented separate geographic segments within its Commercial business below: Commercial — Americas 
(North and South America, other than Mexico); Commercial — Mexico; and Commercial — Rest of World. The Rest of World segment 
includes the results of the United Kingdom and Spanish subsidiaries, which together operate across Europe and South Africa. 
The Group’s Commercial segments are focused on the sale of biological products and are the Group’s only revenue generating segments. 
The Group’s New Technology segment is focused on the research and development of the Group’s PREtec platform.

Below is information regarding the Group’s segment loss information for the year ended:

2018

Revenue*

Proprietary product sales

Third-party product sales

Inter-segment product sales

Total revenue 

Group consolidated revenue

Cost of sales

Research and development

Business development

Sales and marketing

Administration**

Non-cash expenses:

Depreciation

Amortisation

Share-based payment

Segment operating (loss)/profit

Corporate expenses***

Wages and professional fees

Administration****

Operating loss

Finance income

Finance expense

Loss before tax

Americas
$’000

Mexico
$’000

Rest of 
World
$’000

Elimination
$’000

Total
Commercial
$’000

New
Technology
$’000

3,244

26

1,539

4,809

4,809

606

2,521

—

3,127

3,127

1,731

—

67

1,798

1,798

—

—

(1,606)

(1,606)

(1,606)

5,581

2,547

—

8,128

8,128

(2,242)

(1,574)

(647)

1,606

(2,857)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total
$’000

5,581

2,547

—

8,128

8,128

(2,857)

—

(478)

(1,302)

(786)

(25)

(201)

(17)

(242)

—

—

—

—

(805)

(250)

(1,047)

(1,001)

(51)

—

—

(4)

(5)

(61)

447

(967)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(3,487)

(3,487)

(478)

(23)

(501)

(3,154)

(2,037)

—

(3,154)

(193)

(2,230)

(80)

(206)

(78)

(302)

—

(395)

(382)

(206)

(473)

(762)

(4,400)

(5,162)

 (1,334)

(1,537)

(8,033)

90

 (1)

(7,944)

* 

** 

 Revenue from one customer within the Americas segment totalled $1,611,000, or 20% of Group revenues.  
Revenue from one customer within the Mexico segment totalled $1,089,000 or 14% of Group revenues.  
Revenue from one customer within the Rest of World segment totalled $1,100,000 or 14% of Group revenues. 

 The Administration expense for the Rest of World segment includes a charge of $600,000 for the write-off of receivables. During 2018, the Group transferred 
stock from our original distributor to a new distributor in South Africa in order to strengthen its sales position in this region. This transfer of stock has been 
accounted for by the Group recording a write-off of receivables with the original distributor of $600,000.

***  These amounts represent public company expenses for which there is no reasonable basis by which to allocate the amounts across the Group’s segments.

****  Includes net share-based payment expense of $324,000 attributed to corporate employees who are not affiliated with any of the Commercial or 

New Technology segments.

Other segment Information

Segment assets

Segment liabilities

Capital expenditure

Americas
$’000

8,369

1,630

14

 Mexico
 $’000

2,103

414

58

Rest of 
World
 $’000

2,501

168

—

Eliminations
$’000

Total
 Commercial
$’000

New
Technology
$’000

—

—

—

12,973

2,212

72

576

192

43

Total
$’000

13,549

2,404

115

53

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS9. Segment information continued

2017

Revenue*

Proprietary product sales

Third-party product sales

Inter-segment product sales

Total revenue 

Group consolidated revenue

Cost of sales

Research and development

Business development

Sales and marketing

Administration

Non-cash expenses:

Depreciation

Amortisation

Share-based payment

Segment operating (loss)/profit

Corporate expenses**

Wages and professional fees

Administration***

Operating loss

Finance income

Finance expense

Loss before tax

Americas
$’000

Mexico
$’000

Rest of 
World
$’000

Elimination
$’000

Total
Commercial
$’000

New
Technology
$’000

1,574

25

1,608

3,207

3,207

570

2,310

—

2,880

2,880

3,200

6

85

3,291

3,291

—

—

(1,693)

(1,693)

(1,693)

5,344

2,341

—

7,685

7,685

(1,978)

(1,440)

(1,228)

1,693

(2,953)

—

—

—

—

—

—

Total
$’000

5,344

2,341

—

7,685

7,685

(2,953)

—

(561)

(1,277)

(860)

(30)

(255)

(83)

(1,837)

—

—

(688)

(318)

(55)

—

(3)

376

—

—

(1,030)

(58)

(7)

(9)

(70)

889

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(4,350)

(4,350)

(561)

(2,995)

(1,236)

(62)

—

(623)

(2,995)

(188)

(1,424)

(92)

(264)

(156)

(572)

(301)

—

(632)

(393)

(264)

(788)

(5,533)

(6,105)

 (1,048)

1,352

(5,801)

 87

 (2)

 (5,716)

* 

   Revenue from one customer within the Americas segment totalled $1,001,000, or 13% of Group revenues.  
Revenue from one customer within the Rest of World segment totalled $1,958,000, or 25% of Group revenues.  
Revenue from one customer within the Mexico segment totalled $989,000, or 13% of Group revenues.

**    These amounts represent public company expenses for which there is no reasonable basis by which to allocate the amounts across the Group’s segments.

***   Includes net share-based payment expense of $148,000 attributed to corporate employees who are not affiliated with any of the Commercial or New 

Technology segments.

Other segment information

Segment assets

Segment liabilities

Capital expenditure

Americas
$’000

7,014

1,630

—

 Mexico
 $’000

1,997

251

34

Rest of 
World
 $’000

3,198

420

4

Eliminations
$’000

Total 
Commercial
$’000

New 
Technology
$’000

—

—

—

12,209

2,301

38

909

586

87

Total
$’000

13,118

2,887

125

Segment assets include all operating assets used by a segment and consist principally of operating cash, receivables, inventories, 
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, net of allowances and provisions. Segment liabilities include all operating 
liabilities and consist principally of trade payables and accrued liabilities.

54

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 20189. Segment information continued
Geographic information
The Group operates in three principal countries – the United Kingdom (country of domicile), the US and Mexico.

The Group’s revenues from external customers by location of operation are detailed below:

United Kingdom

United States

Mexico

All other

Total

The Group’s non-current assets by location of assets are detailed below:

United Kingdom

United States

Mexico

All other

Total

10. Finance income and expense

Finance income

Interest on deposits and investments

Financing component of revenue contracts

Finance expense

Interest on finance leases

11. Tax credit

Current tax on loss for the year

Deferred tax — origination and reversal of timing differences

Total tax credit

Year Ended
31 December 2018

Year Ended
31 December 2017

Amount
$’000

 1,126

2,101

3,127

1,774

 8,128

Percent

14

26

38

22

100

Amount
$’000

2,687

1,598

2,880

520

7,685

Percent

35

21

37

7

100

Year Ended
31 December 2018

Year Ended
31 December 2017

Amount
$’000

 16

2,307

201

9

Percent

1

91

8

—

Amount
$’000

 31

2,782

180

7

Percent

1

93

6

—

 2,533

100

 3,000

100

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

70

20

90

87

—

87

(1)

(2)

2018
 $’000

(239)

(13)

(252)

 2017
 $’000

(256)

(6)

(262)

55

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS11. Tax credit continued
The reasons for the difference between the actual tax charge for the year and the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK applied to 
profits for the year are as follows:

Loss before tax 

Expected tax credit based on the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19.0% (2017: 19.3%)

Effect on tax rates in foreign jurisdictions

Disallowable expenses

Share-based payment expense per accounts

Prior period R&D credit

Losses available for carryover

Losses utilised in the year

Capital allowances in excess of amortisation

Other temporary differences

Actual tax credit

Deferred tax asset

At 1 January 2018

Credited to the profit and loss account

At 31 December 2018

 2018
 $’000

(7,944)

(1,509)

48

7

151

(419)

1,365

—

(79)

184

(252)

 2017
 $’000

(5,716)

(1,100)

—

31

180

(360)

1,225

(398)

(80)

240

(262)

 Deferred 
taxation
 $’000

66

13

79

The deferred tax asset comprises sundry timing differences.

At 31 December 2018, the Group had a potential deferred tax asset of $18,456,752 (2017: $17,557,554) which includes tax losses 
available to carry forward of $17,793,692 (2017: $16,226,770) (being actual federal, foreign and state losses of $98,786,744 (2017: 
$89,835,719)) arising from historical losses incurred and other timing differences of $1,621,447.

12. Loss per share
Basic loss per ordinary share has been calculated on the basis of the loss for the year of $7,692,000 (2017: loss of $5,454,000) and the 
weighted average number of shares in issue during the period of 168,850,278 (2017: 147,822,881). 

Equity instruments of 14,098,057 (2017: 9,709,418), which includes share options, the 2015 Employee Share Option Plan and the 2017 
Employee Share Option Plan, as shown within Note 21, that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future have been 
considered but not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they are anti-dilutive for the periods presented. 
This is due to the Group incurring a loss on operations for the year.

56

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 201813. Intangible assets

Cost

Balance at 1 January 2017

Additions – externally acquired

Balance at 31 December 2017

Additions – externally acquired

Balance at 31 December 2018

Accumulated amortisation

Balance at 1 January 2017

Amortisation charge for the year

Balance at 31 December 2017

Amortisation charge for the year

Balance at 31 December 2018

Net book value

At 1 January 2017

At 31 December 2017

At 31 December 2018

Goodwill
$’000

Licences and
registrations
$’000

Trade name 
and customer
 relationships
$’000

1,620

3,342

—

—

1,620

3,342

—

—

1,620

3,342

—

—

—

—

—

1,620

1,620

1,620

2,800

264

3,064

206

3,270

542

278

72

159

—

159

—

159

159

—

159

—

159

—

—

—

Total
$’000

5,121

—

5,121

—

5,121

2,959

264

3,223

206

3,429

2,162

1,898

1,692

The intangible asset balances have been tested for impairment using discounted budgeted cash flows of the relevant cash generating 
units. For the years ended 31 December 2017 and 2018, cash flows are projected over a five-year period with a residual growth rate 
assumed at 0%. For the years ended 31 December 2017 and 2018, a pre-tax discount factor of 15.6% and 14.9% has been used over the 
forecast period.

Goodwill
Goodwill comprises of a net book value of $1,432,000 related to the 2007 acquisition of the assets of Eden Bioscience and $188,000 
related to an acquisition of VAMTech LLC in 2004. The entire amount is allocated to Harpin, a cash generating unit within the 
Commercial – Americas segment. No impairment charge is considered necessary, and no reasonable possible change in key 
assumptions used would lead to an impairment in the carrying value of goodwill. 

Licences and registrations
These amounts represent the cost of licences and registrations acquired in order to market and sell the Group’s products internationally 
across a wide geography. These amounts are amortised evenly according to the straight-line method over the term of the license or 
registration. Impairment is reviewed and tested according to the method expressed above. Licenses and registrations have a 
weighted average remaining amortisation period of three years. No impairment charge is considered necessary, and no reasonable 
possible change in key assumptions used would lead to an impairment in the carrying value of licenses and registrations.

57

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS14. Property, plant and equipment

Cost

Balance at 1 January 2017

Additions

Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2017

Additions

Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2018

Accumulated depreciation

Balance at 1 January 2017

Depreciation charge for the year

Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2017

Depreciation charge for the year

Disposals

Balance at 31 December 2018

Net book value

At 1 January 2017

At 31 December 2017

At 31 December 2018

Production
 machinery 
$’000

Office 
equipment 
$’000

Leasehold 
improvements
$’000

Vehicles
 $’000

Total 
$’000

13

—

(13)

—

—

—

—

13

—

(13)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

1,016

90

—

1,106

53

—

1,159

536

338

—

874

171

—

1,045

480

232

114

810

330

2,169

5

—

815

4

—

819

193

13

—

206

167

—

373

617

609

446

30

—

125

(13)

360

2,281

58

(7)

411

191

42

—

233

44

(7)

115

(7)

2,389

933

393

(13)

1,313

382

(7)

270

1,688

139

127

141

1,236

968

701

The net book value of property, plant and equipment includes an amount of $nil (2017: $6,429) in respect of assets held under finance 
leases. Depreciation expense includes an amount of $nil (2017: $7,700) in respect of assets held under finance leases.

15. Inventories

Raw materials

Finished goods and goods for resale

2018
$’000

114

2,861

2,975

2017
$’000

41

1,495

1,536

The inventory provision amount reversed during the year was $4,313 (2017: reversal of $10,794). In 2018, raw materials and finished 
goods for resale included in cost of sales was $2.7 million (2017: $2.8 million).

58

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 201816. Trade and other receivables

Current:

Trade receivables 

Less: provision for impairment 

Trade receivables, net 

Other receivables and prepayments

Current trade and other receivables

Non-current:

Other receivables

Less: provision for impairment

Deferred tax asset (see note 11)

Non-current trade and other receivables

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

3,366

(186)

3,180

177

3,357

61

—

79

140

4,131

(52)

4,079

232

4,311

68

—

66

134

3,497

4,445

The trade receivable current balance represents trade receivables with a due date for collection within a one-year period. The other 
receivable non-current balance represents lease deposits. 

The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses for sales contracts with 180 days or fewer 
payment terms. To measure expected credit losses on a collective basis, trade receivables and contract assets are grouped based 
on similar credit risk and ageing. The expected loss rates are based on the Group’s historical credit losses experienced over the three 
year period prior to the period end. For contracts provided on these terms, the credit risk and history of default is immaterial such that 
no provision is assessed.

Sales contract receivables provided on terms greater than 180 days are at first discounted to recognise the financing component of 
the transaction and then assessed using the “general approach”. Under this approach, the Group models and probability weights a 
number of scenarios based on their assessment of the credit risk and historical expected losses. 

Trade receivables

Expected credit loss assessed

Considered under 
the simplified
 approach
$’000

Considered under
 the general 
approach 
$’000

2,068

(8)

2,060

1,298

(178)

1,120

The receivables considered under the general approach relates to two customers in the Rest of World segment. These receivables 
had payment terms in excess of 12 months. The key considerations in the assessment of the provision were the probability of default, 
expected loss in the event of default and the exposure at the point of default.

The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the fair value of each class of receivables set out above.

No transitional adjustment was assessed at 1 January 2018 owing to the credit risk profile of trade receivables at this date.

Movements on the provision for impairment of trade receivables are as follows:

Balance at the beginning of the year

Provided

Receivables written off as uncollectible

Foreign exchange

Balance at the end of the year

The net value of trade receivables for which a provision for impairment has been made is $1,306,000 (2017: $80,000).

2018
$’000

52

775

(641)

—

186

2017
$’000

51

(2)

(1)

4

52

59

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS16. Trade and other receivables continued
The following is an analysis of the Group’s trade receivables, both current and past due, identifying the totals of trade receivables 
which are not yet due and those which are past due but not impaired.

Current

Past due:

Up to 30 days

31 to 60 days

61 to 90 days

Greater than 90 days

Total

17. Trade and other payables

Current:

Trade payables

Accruals

Taxation and social security

Income tax liability

18. Finance leases
(a) Current borrowings

Finance leases

2018
$’000

2,608

2017
$’000

3,927

1

82

24

465

3,180

7

17

39

89

4,079

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

1,434

918

50

2

1,523

1,292

62

2

2,404

2,879

2018
$’000

—

2017
$’000

8

Finance lease obligations are secured by retention of title to the relevant equipment and vehicles.

(b) Due date for payment:
The contractual maturity of the Group’s financial liabilities on a gross basis is as follows:

In less than one year

In more than one year, but less than two years

Trade and other payables

Finance leases

2018
$’000

1,681

—

2017
$’000

1,863

—

1,681

1,863

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

—

—

—

8

—

8

60

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 201819. Financial instruments
(a) Capital risk management
The Group manages its capital to ensure that all entities in the Group will be able to continue as going concerns, while maximising shareholder 
value through the optimisation of its debt and equity structure. The capital structure of the Group consists of cash and cash equivalents and 
equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising issued capital, reserves and accumulated deficit as disclosed in note 22. 

(b) Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities

Financial assets

Trade and other receivables

Investments

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Borrowings due within one year

Borrowings due after one year

Fair value through  
profit or loss

Amortised cost  
(loans and receivables)

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

—

—

1,825

2,719

—

—

1,825

2,719

3,180

—

2,459

5,639

4,147

—

1,175

5,322

Amortised cost

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

1,681

1,863

—

—

8

—

1,681

1,871

The amounts disclosed for all of the above financial assets and financial liabilities approximate fair value in all material respects. 
Accrued liabilities are not included in the table as owing to their nature they are not classified as financial liabilities.

(c) Investments
2018 — Investments

Description

PNC Money Market Fund

PNC Ultra Short Bond Fund 

2017 — Investments

Description

PNC Money Market Fund

PNC Ultra Short Bond Fund 

Classification

Government

Mutual Fund

Classification

Government

Mutual Fund

2018
Value
($’000)

77

1,748

1,825

2017 
Value
($’000)

1

2,718

2,719

The above instruments are Level 1 in the IFRS 13 fair value measurements hierarchy.

The Group limits its investments to instruments with maturities of less than five years having a rating at or exceeding investment 
grade in order to limit credit and liquidity risk. These investments are managed by an investment adviser and the portfolio’s 
performance is reviewed by key management personnel. The aim of the portfolio includes both capital preservation and a 
rate of return that exceeds the rate available through the purchase of money market securities.

61

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS19. Financial instruments continued
(d) Liquidity risk
The Group manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves and banking facilities, by reference to continuously monitored 
forecast and actual cash flows. As part of its monitoring, the Group ensures that the financial liabilities due to be paid can be met 
by existing cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are composed of short-term investment grade securities and are readily 
marketable and convertible to cash. The Group does not currently generate sufficient cash from its operations to meet its annual 
funding needs. In consideration of the Group’s current resources and review of financial forecasts and projections, the Directors have 
a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least 12 months from the 
approval of the financial statements.

(e) Financial risk management objectives
The Group invests its surplus cash in bank deposits denominated in US Dollars and British Pounds, which earn interest at money market 
rates, and in short-term investments comprised of notes and bonds with maturities of less than five years and having investment grade 
ratings. In doing so, the Group exposes itself to fluctuations in money market interest rates and market price fluctuations. 

(f) Market risk
The Group is exposed to risk from movements in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and market prices that affect its 
assets, liabilities and anticipated future transactions. 

The Group is exposed to foreign currency risk from transactions and from translating the monetary net assets of overseas entities 
denominated in currencies other than functional currency. Transaction exposure arises because affiliated companies undertake 
transactions in foreign currencies. The Group does not use forward foreign exchange rate contracts to hedge exchange rate risk.

The US Dollar carrying amounts of the Group’s material foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities 
at the reporting date are as follows:

Euro

Pound Sterling

Mexican Peso

Brazilian Real

Assets

Liabilities

2018
$’000

152

1,849

1,262

772

2017
$’000

220

2,595

1,360

—

2018
$’000

46

122

413

120

2017
$’000

263

157

251

—

If the exchange rate on uncovered exposures were to move significantly there would be foreign exchange differences on the retranslation 
of financial assets and liabilities and an impact on the Group’s gross profit. A significant change in the Mexican Peso or British Pound 
could have a negative impact on the Group’s gross profit. 

A hypothetical 10% change (positive or negative) in foreign currency exchange rates applicable to our business would have the 
following effect (increase or decrease) on revenue:

Mexican Peso

Pound Sterling

Brazilian Real

2018
$’000

313

113

117

A hypothetical 10% change (positive or negative) in foreign currency exchange rates applicable to our business would have the 
following effect (increase or decrease) on expenses:

2018
$’000

268

593

101

Mexican Peso

Pound Sterling

Brazilian Real

62

2017
$’000

288

277

—

2017
$’000

250

690

—

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 201819. Financial instruments continued
(g) Price risk
The Group is exposed to price risk on its investments. To manage the price risk arising from investments in securities, the Group limits 
its portfolio to include only investment grade securities on active exchanges having maturities of less than five years.

(h) Interest rate risk
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash and investment balances. To manage the interest rate risk, the Group limits its 
portfolio to cash and investment grade securities on active exchanges having maturities of less than five years.

If interest rates were to move significantly, finance revenues could be affected. However, this impact would not be material to the 
Group’s financial statements and, therefore, no analysis of the sensitivities has been presented.

The Group is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash deposits, which earn interest at a variable rate of interest.

The Group’s borrowings comprise finance leases, which are at fixed rates. 

The Group does not utilise any hedging instruments to address interest rate risk.

(i) Credit risk management
The Group’s principal credit risk relates to the recovery of trade receivables. In order to manage credit risk, the Group sets limits 
for customers based on a combination of payment history and third-party credit references. Credit limits are reviewed on a regular 
basis in conjunction with debt ageing and collection history. Balances that are beyond agreed upon terms are actively followed up 
to ensure collection. 

The Group sells to a large number of customers across international locations within the US, Europe, South Africa and Mexico. 

Further details on trade receivables, including analysis of bad debts and ageing, are given in note 16.

The Group manages the credit risk on its investments by limiting investments to notes and bonds with maturities of less than five 
years having investment grade ratings.

The Group believes the credit risk on liquid funds, being cash and cash equivalents, is limited because the counterparties are banks 
with high-credit ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. However, the concentration of credit risk by counterparty 
does exceed 10% of the overall cash and cash equivalent balance.

The maximum exposure to credit risk on cash balances at the reporting date is the carrying value of the cash balances. The Group 
ensures that its investments are maintained in high quality investment grade securities to limit credit risk.

20. Subsidiary undertakings
The following were subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 31 December 2018.

Name

Plant Health Care, Inc.

Plant Health Care, Inc.

Plant Health Care de 
Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.

Registered addresses

701 S. Carson Street
Suite 200
Carson City, NV 89701

Bodega 26
Avenida Ceylan 959
Colonia Industrial Vallejo
2300 Ciudad de Mexico
CDMX, Mexico

Country of incorporation 
or registration

United States 
(Nevada)

United States 
(Pennsylvania)

Mexico

Proportion of voting 
rights and ordinary 
share capital held

100%

Nature of business

Holding 
company

100%*

100%*

Sales

Sales

Plant Health Care (UK) Limited 1 Scott Place

United Kingdom

100%*

Sales

Plant Health Care Espaňa

2 Hardman Street
Manchester M3 3AA

CL. Serrano, 76
28.612, Madrid

Plant Health Care Brazil

Rua Dr Antonio Cento 560 – cj 708
São Paulo – SP CEP 04750-001

VAMTech, LLC

*  Held indirectly.

2711 Centerville Road
Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19808

Spain

Brazil

United States 
(Delaware)

100%*

100%*

100%*

Sales

Sales

Sales

For all undertakings listed above, the country of operation is the same as its country of incorporation or registration.

63

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS21. Share capital
(a) Issued share capital

Allotted, called up and fully-paid share capital:

172,822,881 (2017: 147,822,881) ordinary shares at £0.01 each

(b) Movement in share capital
The movements on issued share capital are as follows:

In issue at 1 January 2017

Shares issued

In issue at 31 December 2017

Shares issued

In issue at 31 December 2018

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

2,586

2,237

Ordinary shares of
Plant Health Care plc

Number

147,822,881

—

$’000

2,237

—

147,822,881

2,237

25,000,000

349

172,822,881

2,586

During the year ended 31 December 2018, the following fully paid £0.01 ordinary shares in the Company were issued:

i.) 

 25,000,000 new ordinary shares with net proceeds of $6,689,000 (directly attributable costs of $270,000) were issued pursuant to 
an equity placing at £0.20 per share.

(c) Other equity instruments
The Company had the following other equity instruments in issue at 31 December 2018 and 2017:

Share awards under the 2004 plan

Share awards under 2015 plan

Share awards under 2017 plan

2018
Number

2017
Number

414,538

806,038

3,511,635

4,359,212

10,171,884

4,544,168

14,098,057

9,709,418

(d) Share options
(i) 2 004 Employee Share Option Plan
The Company has issued share options to certain employees under the Plant Health Care plc Unapproved Share Option Scheme 2004. 
In 2014, the scheme reached the 10th anniversary of its approval by shareholders; no further options may be granted. At the time of its 
admission to AIM, the Company also agreed to honour outstanding options under the Plant Health Care, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. 
No further options have been or will be issued under that plan. In addition, in limited instances, the Company has granted options to 
certain management for ordinary share capital of the Company under separate unapproved option agreements.

The movements on share options are as follows:

Outstanding at 1 January 2017

Awarded

Exercised

Forfeited

Outstanding at 31 December 2017

Awarded

Exercised

Forfeited

Outstanding at 31 December 2018

Options over ordinary shares

Directors 
and
 former 
Directors

Other

Total

Weighted 
average 
exercise
 price

535,538

456,000

991,538

148p

—

—

—

—

—

—

— (185,500)

(185,500)

535,538

270,500

806,038

—

—

—

—

—

—

(200,000)

(191,500)

(391,500)

335,538

79,000

414,538

—

—

225p

131p

—

—

168p

96p

Of the total number of options outstanding at 31 December 2018, 414,538 (2017: 716,652) had vested and were exercisable. The weighted 
average exercise price was 96p (2017: 133p).

The options outstanding at 31 December 2018 have a weighted average remaining life of 3.17 years (2017: 2.28 years) and the range of 
exercise prices is 53p to 254p (2017: 53p to 325p).

64

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 2018 
21. Share capital continued
(d) Share options continued
(ii) 2015 Employee Share Option Plan

Outstanding at 31 December 2016

1,790,000

266,250 2,056,250

105p

Directors

Other

Total

Weighted
average
exercise price

Awarded 

Forfeited

Outstanding as 31 December 2017

Awarded

Forfeited

Outstanding as 31 December 2018

— 4,285,132

4,285,132

(1,790,000)

(192,170)

(1,982,170)

— 4,359,212

4,359,212

—

—

—

—

—

(847,577)

(847,577)

3,511,635

3,511,635

20p

99p

24p

—

27p

23p

Of the total number of options outstanding at 31 December 2018, 177,500 (2017: 177,500) had vested and were exercisable.

The options outstanding at 31 December 2018 have a weighted average remaining life of 2.0 years (2017: 3.0 years) and the range of 
exercise prices is 20p to 89p (2017: 20p to 89p).

(iii) 2017 Employee Share Option Plan

Outstanding at 31 December 2016

Awarded 

Forfeited

Outstanding as 31 December 2017

Awarded

Forfeited

Outstanding as 31 December 2018

Directors

Other

Total

3,768,577

3,011,131

6,779,708

—

—

—

(786,920)

(1,448,620)

(2,235,540)

2,981,657

1,562,511

4,544,168

2,327,642 3,300,074

5,627,716

—

—

—

5,309,299 4,862,585 10,171,884

Weighted
average
exercise price

25p

—

25p

25p

29p

—

28p

Of the total number of options outstanding at 31 December 2018, 5,627,716 (2017: 1,701,380) had vested and were exercisable.

The options outstanding at 31 December 2018 have a weighted average remaining life of 8.98 years and the range of exercise prices 
is 24p to 50p.

22. Reserves
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within owners’ equity:

Reserve

Share capital

Share premium

Description and purpose

Amount subscribed for share capital at nominal value.

Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value.

Foreign exchange reserve

Gains/losses on retranslating the net assets of overseas operations.

Accumulated deficit

Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the consolidated income statement. During the 
year ended 31 December 2014, the Company transferred the amounts in the share-based 
payment reserve and reverse acquisition reserve into retained earnings.

65

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTS23. Pensions
The Group does not maintain any defined benefit pension plans. The Group does maintain a retirement plan qualified under section 
401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. This plan covers all US employees. In 2018, the Group’s pension expense under the 
scheme was $61,296 (2017:$50,532). Mexico has a government-run pension plan to which our operations there must contribute. In 
2018, the expense for this plan was $2,083 (2017: $1,828). Several United Kingdom employees receive contributions to their pension 
plans. The expense for this was $7,808 (2017: $7,310). The total pension liability at the end of the year was $71,188 (2017: $59,670).

24. Leases
Finance leases — as lessee
The Group leases vehicles, production equipment and office equipment on leases classified as finance leases.

Future lease payments are due as follows:

2018

Not later than one year

Later than one year and not later than five years

2017

Not later than one year

Later than one year and not later than five years

Minimum 
lease 
payments
 $’000

Interest 
$’000

Present
value 
$’000

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

Minimum 
lease 
payments
 $’000

Interest 
$’000

Present
 value 
$’000

8

—

8

—

—

—

8

—

8

Operating leases
The Group leases all of its properties, as well as office equipment. The terms of property leases vary from country to country and tend 
to have rent reviews at the end of the lease term for renewal purposes.

The total present values of minimum lease payments are due as follows:

Not later than one year

Later than one year and not later than five years

2018
$’000 

378

434

812

2017
$’000 

364

554

918

66

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Notes forming part of the Group financial statements continuedfor the year ended 31 December 201825. Standards, amendments and interpretations to published standards not yet effective
The IASB and the International Financing Reporting Interpretations Committee (‘IFRIC’) have issued the following standards and 
interpretations to be applied to financial statements with periods commencing on or after the following dates:

New standards and interpretations currently in issue but not effective, based on EU mandatory effective dates are:

Standard

IFRS 16 

Description

Leases

Effective date

1 January 2019

Expected impact

Assessment ongoing

IFRS 16:
IFRS 16 “Leases” was issued in January 2016 to replace IAS 17 “Leases”. The standard is effective for accounting periods beginning 
on or after 1 January 2019.

IFRS 16 will primarily change lease accounting for lessees; lease agreements will give rise to the recognition of an asset representing the 
right to use the leased item and a loan obligation for future lease payables. Lease costs will be recognised in the form of depreciation of 
the right to use asset and interest on the lease liability. Lessee accounting under IFRS 16 will be similar in many respects to existing IAS 17 
accounting for finance leases, but will be substantively different to existing accounting for operating leases where rental charges are 
currently recognised on a straight-line basis and no lease asset or lease loan obligation is recognised.

The Group is still assessing the potential impact of the alterations across its four leases.

No other standards or amendments are considered likely to have an effect on the financial statements going forward. Plant Health Care 
does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards and interpretations will have a material accounting impact on the Group’s 
financial statements.

26. Note supporting statement of cash flows

At 1 January 2018

Cash Flows:

Repayment of finance lease principal

Finance expense

Issue of Ordinary Share Capital

At 31 December 2018

Finance
 leases
$’000
Note 18

8

(7)

(1)

—

—

Share 
Capital
$’000
Note 22

2,237

Share
 Premium
$’000
Note 22

79,786

Total
$’000

82,031

—

—

—

—

(7)

(1)

349

6,340

6,689

2,586

86,126

88,712

Foreign exchange losses of $1,120,000 (2017: $1,261,000 gain) arising on intercompany balances within the consolidated statement of 
cash flows, have been reclassified to within ‘cash flows from operating activities’, so as to better reflect the nature of the non-cash 
movement. This has had no impact on the closing cash balances previously reported.

67

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCompany statement of financial position
at 31 December 2018

Fixed assets

Fixed asset investments

Current assets

Debtors

Cash at bank and in hand

Total current assets

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

Net current assets/(liabilities)

Total assets less current liabilities

Capital and reserves

Called-up share capital

Share premium

Accumulated deficit

Shareholders’ funds

Note

2018
$’000

2017
$’000

33

16,381

19,018

35

36

30

30

30

27

392

419

312

107

18

220

238

298

(60)

16,488

18,958

2,586

86,126

2,237

79,786

(72,224)

(63,065)

16,488

18,958

The financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board on 9 April 2019.

Christopher Richards
Director

Registered no: 05116780 (England and Wales)

The Company has taken advantage of the exemption allowed under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 and has not presented its own 
profit and loss in these financial statements. The Group’s loss for the year includes loss after tax of $9,956,000 (2017: loss of $6,297,000), 
which is dealt with in the financial statements of the parent company. 

The notes on pages 70 to 72 form part of these financial statements. 

68

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Company statement of changes in equity
for the year ended 31 December 2018

Balance at 1 January 2017

Shares issued

Share-based payment

Loss in the year

Balance at 31 December 2017

Shares issued

Share-based payment

Loss in the year

Balance at 31 December 2018

The notes on pages 70 to 72 form part of these financial statements. 

Share
Capital
$’000

2,237

Share
 premium
$’000

79,786

Accumulated 
deficit
$’000

Total
$’000

(57,704)

24,319

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

936

—

936

(6,297)

(6,297)

2,237

79,786

(63,065)

18,958

349

6,340

—

—

—

—

—

797

6,689

797

(9,956)

(9,956)

2,586

86,126

(72,224)

16,488

69

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes forming part of the Company financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2018

27. Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with FRS 102 the Financial 
Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The principal accounting policies, which have been 
applied consistently, are set out below. 

The preparation of financial statements in compliance with FRS 102 requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also 
requires management to exercise judgement in applying the Company’s accounting policies. See note 28.

In preparing the separate financial statements of the parent company, advantage has been taken of the following disclosure 
exemptions available in FRS 102:

•  only one reconciliation of the number of shares outstanding at the beginning and end of the period has been presented as the 

reconciliations for the Group and the parent company would be identical;

•  no cash flow statement has been presented for the parent company;

•  disclosures in respect of the parent company’s financial instruments have not been presented as equivalent disclosures have 

been provided in respect of the Group as a whole;

•  disclosures in respect of the parent company’s share-based payment arrangements have not been presented as equivalent 

disclosures have been provided in respect of the Group as a whole; and

•  no disclosure has been given for the aggregate remuneration of the key management personnel of the parent company as their 

remuneration is included in the totals for the Group as a whole.

Investments
Fixed asset investments comprise investments by the Company in the shares of subsidiary undertakings and loans to Group 
undertakings. At the end of each financial period, the Directors review the carrying amount of the Company’s investments with 
reference to forecast discounted future cash flows and related estimates and judgements to determine whether there is any 
indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. They are stated at cost less any provision where, in the opinion 
of the Directors, there has been impairment.

Share-based payments
The Company operates a number of equity-settled, share-based payment plans, under which it receives services from employees 
and non-employees as consideration for the Company’s equity instruments, in the form of options or restricted stock units (‘‘awards’’). 
The fair value of the award is recognised as an expense, measured as of the grant date using a binomial option pricing model. The total 
amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of instruments granted, excluding the impact of any service and 
non-market performance vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of 
options that are expected to vest. The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is typically the period over which 
all of the specified vesting conditions are to be met.

The Company grants share options and shares under its share-based payment plans directly to employees of its subsidiaries. 
In accordance with the provisions of the plan, the cost of the share-based payments will be recorded by each subsidiary as an 
expense, with a corresponding increase in equity as a contribution from the parent. The Company, over whose shares options are 
issued, recognises an increase in the investment in the related subsidiary and a credit to accumulated deficit.

Deferred taxation
Deferred tax balances are recognised in respect of timing differences that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet 
date. However, where there is uncertainty over the timing of their realisation, deferred tax assets are not recognised. 

28. Judgement in applying accounting policies and key sources of estimation uncertainty
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors have made the following judgements:

•  At the end of the financial period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its fixed asset investments to determine whether 
there is any indication that those assets have suffered any impairment loss. The recoverable amount is determined based on a 
value-in-use calculation. The use of this method requires the estimation of future cash flows and the choice of a discount rate in 
order to calculate the present value of the cash flows. Actual outcomes may vary. More details are included in note 33.

29. Share-based payments
See note 21 of the Group financial statements.

70

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 201830. Reserves
See note 22 of the Group financial statements for a description of the nature and purpose of each reserve within owner’s equity.

31. Directors’ remuneration
The Directors’ remuneration for the Company is disclosed in Note 7 of the Group financial statements.

32. Staff costs
Staff costs for all employees, including Executive Directors, comprise: 

Wages and salaries

Social security and payroll taxes

Share-based payments charge

The average number of employees of the Group during the year, including Executive Directors, was four (2017: four).

2018
$’000

246

46

292

289

581

2017
$’000

261

34

295

515

810

Total
$’000

77,121

3,946

Shares in 
Group
undertakings
$’000

Loans to
Group
undertakings
$’000

16,915

60,206

—

3,946

16,915

64,152

81,067

—

6,836

6,836

16,915

70,988

87,903

(16,915)

(37,556)

(54,471)

—

(7,578)

(7,578)

(16,915)

(45,134)

(62,049)

—

(9,473)

(9,473)

(16,915)

(54,607)

(71,522)

—

—

19,018

16,381

19,018

16,381

33. Fixed asset investments

Cost

Cost at 1 January 2017

Additions, net of repayments

Cost at 31 December 2017

Additions, net of repayments

Cost at 31 December 2018

Impairments

Impairments at 1 January 2017

Charge

Impairments at 31 December 2017

Charge

Impairments at 31 December 2018

Net book value

At 31 December 2017

At 31 December 2018

The fixed asset investment balances have been tested for impairment using discounted budgeted cash flows, a pre-tax discount rate 
of 14.9% (2017: 15.6%), and performance projections over five years. The calculated net present value in this review is $16,381,000 
(2017: net present value $19,018,000), which resulted in an impairment of $9,473,000 in 2018 (2017: $7,577,000).

71

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018FINANCIAL STATEMENTSNotes forming part of the Company financial statements continued
for the year ended 31 December 2018

34. Subsidiary undertakings
The subsidiary undertakings of the Company are disclosed in Note 20 of the Group financial statements.

35. Debtors

Prepayments

All amounts fall due within one year.

36. Creditors

Trade creditors

Accruals

Totals

2018
$’000

27

 2017
 $’000 

18

2018
$’000

117

195

312

 2017
 $’000 

103

195

298

37. Share capital
The share capital of the Company is disclosed in Note 21 of the Group financial statements.

38. Related party transactions
The Company has taken advantage of the exemption allowed by Financial Reporting Standard 102 “Related Party Transactions”, 
not to disclose any transactions with its wholly-owned subsidiary companies as these are included within the consolidated financial 
statements of the Group.

72

Plant Health Care plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018Directors and advisers

Directors

Dr Christopher G J Richards 
Executive Chairman/Interim CEO

Dr Richard H Webb 
Non-executive Director

Michael J Higgins 
Senior Independent Director

William M Lewis 
Non-executive Director

Secretary
Christine Mazzone

Registered office
1 Scott Place
2 Hardman Street
Manchester M3 3AA 

Company number
05116780

Nominated adviser and broker
Arden Partners, plc
125 Old Broad Street
London EC2N 1AR

Auditor
BDO LLP
55 Baker Street
London W1U 7EU

Company solicitor
DWF LLP
1 Scott Place
2 Hardman Street
Manchester M3 3AA 

Registrar
Neville Registrars Limited
Neville House
18 Laurel Lane 
Halesowen
West Midlands B63 3DA

In this document, references to “the Company” are to Plant Health Care plc. References to “Plant Health Care”, “the Group”, “we” or “our” 
are to Plant Health Care plc and its subsidiaries and lines of business, or any of them as the context may require. The Plant Health Care 
name and logo, Myconate®, ProAct, N-Hibit, Innatus 3G and other names and marks appearing herein and on Company literature are 
trademarks or trade names of Plant Health Care. All other third-party trade mark rights are acknowledged.

Plant Health Care plc’s commitment to environmental issues is reflected in this 
Annual Report which has been printed on Novatech Silk, an FSC® certified material. 
This document was printed by Proco using their environmental print technology, 
which minimises the impact of printing on the environment with 99 per cent of dry 
waste is diverted from landfill. Both the printer and the paper mill are registered 
to ISO 14001.

C003379

Plant Health Care plc 
2626 Glenwood Avenue 
Suite 350 
Raleigh 
NC 27608 
USA

Phone:  919-926-1600 
Email: 

info@planthealthcare.com

P

L

A

N

T

H

E

A

L

T

H

C

A

R

E

P

L

C

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

A

N

D

A

C

C

O

U

N

T

S

2

0

1

8