Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Gold / Radius Gold Inc.

Radius Gold Inc.

rdu · TSX-V Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker rdu
Exchange TSX-V
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Gold
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Radius Gold Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
FINANCIAL REVIEW 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 
 (Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF RADIUS GOLD INC. 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Radius Gold Inc., which comprise 
the consolidated  statement of financial position as at December 31, 2017 and the consolidated statements 
of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the  year then 
ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. 

Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements 
Management  is  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  these consolidated financial 
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and for such internal control as 
management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that 
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

Auditors’ Responsibility 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. 
We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with  Canadian  generally  accepted  auditing  standards.  Those 
standards  require  that  we  comply  with  ethical  requirements  and  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain 
reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the consolidated financial  statements  are  free  from  material 
misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
 consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including 
the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due 
to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the 
entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit 
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on 
the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of 
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well 
as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 
audit opinion.  

Opinion 
In  our  opinion,  the consolidated financial  statements  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial 
position of Radius Gold Inc. as at December 31, 2017, and its financial performance and its cash flows for 
the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. 

Other Matter 
The financial statements of Radius Gold Inc. as at December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended were 
audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion on those statements dated May 1, 2017. 

Chartered Professional Accountants 

Vancouver, British Columbia 
April 26, 2018 

Nanaimo201 – 1825 Bowen RdNanaimo, BC  V9S 1H1T: 250 755 2111F: 250 984 0886T: 604 282 3600F: 604 357 1376Langley305 – 9440 202 StLangley, BC  V1M 4A6Vancouver7th Floor 355 Burrard StVancouver, BC  V6C 2G8T: 604 687 1231F: 604 688 4675Smythe LLP | smythecpa.com  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RADIUS GOLD INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

As at: 

ASSETS 

Current assets 

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5) 
Available-for-sale investments (Note 6) 
Derivative investments (Note 6) 
Receivables (Note 7) 
Due from related parties (Note 15) 
Prepaid expenses and deposits (Note 15) 

Total current assets 

Non-current assets 

Long-term deposits (Note 15) 
Property and equipment (Note 8) 
Mineral and royalty interests (Note 10) 
Investment in associate (Note 9) 

Total non-current assets 

TOTAL ASSETS 

December 31, 
2017 

December 31, 
2016 

 $          3,317,667  
4,938,978  
204,252 
78,752  
-  
44,426  

 $          5,130,064  
2,793,962  
- 
194,586  
16,800  
188,833  

8,584,075  

8,324,245  

123,098  
71,053  
1,410,142  
1  

1,604,294  

123,098  
53,354  
1,348,165  
1  

1,524,618  

 $        10,188,369  

 $          9,848,863  

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 

Current liabilities 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 15) 

 $             199,278  

 $             107,884  

Shareholders' equity 

Share capital (Note 12) 
Other equity reserve 
Deficit 
Accumulated other comprehensive income 

Total shareholders' equity 

56,592,613  
6,849,808  
 (54,326,100) 
872,770  

56,592,613  
6,849,808  
 (54,520,103) 
818,661  

9,989,091  

9,740,979  

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 

 $        10,188,369  

 $          9,848,863  

APPROVED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUE ON APRIL 26, 2018 BY: 

   “Simon Ridgway”                                 , Director 
Simon Ridgway 

     “William Katzin”                         , Director 
William Katzin 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

1 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RADIUS GOLD INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

Royalty Revenue (Note 10) 

 $                        -  

 $            431,643  

2017 

2016 

Exploration expenditures (Notes 15) 
Write-down of exploration and evaluation assets (Note 10) 

General and administrative expenses 

Amortization (Note 8) 
Legal and audit fees 
Management fees (Note 15) 
Office and miscellaneous (Note 15) 
Salaries and benefits (Note 15) 
Share-based compensation (Note 13) 
Shareholder communications (Note 15) 
Transfer agent and regulatory fees (Note 15) 
Travel and accommodation (Note 15) 

1,140,432  
69,187 
1,209,619 

544,586  
- 
544,586 

19,758  
72,797  
               42,000  
104,399  
114,076  
- 
13,346  
18,125  
23,441  

24,812  
107,584  
               42,000  
141,286  
128,020  
213,150 
18,745  
14,548  
11,287  

407,942  

701,432  

Loss from operations  

 (1,617,561) 

 (814,375) 

Share of post-tax losses of associates (Note 9) 
Gain on sale of mineral property interest (Note 10) 
Gain on property assignment (Note 6) 
Gain on dilution in associated company (Note 9) 
Gain on reclassification as available-for-sale investment (Notes 6 and 9) 
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) 
Gain on sale of available-for-sale investments (Note 6) 
Impairment of available-for-sale investments (Note 6) 
Fair value gain of derivative investments (Note 6) 
Gain from mineral property option agreements (Note 10) 
Investment income 
Impairment of receivables (Notes 7 and 10) 

 (50,000) 
1,658,928 
606,664 
- 
- 
16,256  
 204,346 
 (839,555) 
204,252 
-  
10,673  
- 

 (136,000) 
- 
- 
170,045 
691,727 
(37,286)  
 2,688,336 
 (205,321) 
- 
276,252  
13,068  
(784,180) 

Net income for the year 

 $           194,003 

 $         1,862,266 

Other comprehensive income  
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: 

Fair value gains on available-for-sale investments (Note 6) 

                54,109 

                683,953 

Total comprehensive income  

 $           248,112 

 $         2,546,219 

Basic and diluted income per share 

 $0.00 

 $0.02 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 

86,675,617  

86,675,617  

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

2 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
RADIUS GOLD INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

Number of 
common 
shares 

86,675,617  
-  
-  
-  

86,675,617  
-  
-  

Other 
equity 
reserve 

Accumulated 
other 
comprehensive 
income  

Share 
capital 

Accumulated 
deficit 

Total 

 $56,592,613  
-  
-  
-  

 $  6,636,658  
-  
-  
213,150  

 $         134,708  
-  
683,953  
-  

$(56,382,369) 
1,862,266  
-  
-  

 $      6,981,610  
1,862,266  
683,953  
213,150  

56,592,613  
-  
-  

6,849,808  
-  
-  

818,661  
-  
54,109  

 (54,520,103) 
 194,003 
-  

9,740,979  
194,003 
54,109  

Balance, December 31, 2015 

Income for the year 
Available-for-sale investments 
Share-based compensation 

Balance, December 31, 2016 

Income for the year 
Available-for-sale investments 

Balance, December 31, 2017 

86,675,617  

 $56,592,613  

 $  6,849,808  

 $         872,770   $(54,326,100) 

 $      9,989,091  

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

3 

 
 
 
 
  
             
 
 
 
 
RADIUS GOLD INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  
For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

Cash provided by (used in): 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
Net income for the year 
Items not involving cash: 

Amortization 
Gain from mineral property option agreements 
Gain on sale of mineral property interest 
Gain on property assignment 
Impairment of receivable 
Write-down of exploration and evaluation assets 
Gain on reclassification as available-for-sale investment 
Impairment of available-for-sale investments 
Gain on sale of available-for-sale investments 
Fair value gain of derivative investments 
Share of post-tax losses of associates 
Gain on dilution in associate 
Share-based compensation 

Changes in non-cash working capital items: 

Receivables 
Prepaid expenses and deposits 
Long-term deposits 
Due from related parties 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

Cash used in operating activities 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
Purchase of investments 
Investment in associate 
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation asset acquisition costs  
Proceeds from disposal of mineral property 
Proceeds from mineral property option agreements 
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale investments 
Purchase of property and equipment 

Cash provided by (used for) investing activities 

2017 

2016 

 $           194,003 

 $         1,862,266 

19,758  
- 
(1,658,928) 
(606,664) 
- 
69,187  
- 
839,555  
(204,346)  
(204,252) 
50,000  
- 
- 

(1,501,687) 

 115,834 
144,407  
-  
 16,800 
 91,394 

 (1,133,252) 

 (951,230) 
(50,000) 
 (131,164) 
186,710 
-  
303,996  
(37,457) 

 (679,145) 

24,812  
 (276,252) 
- 
 - 
784,180 
-  
(691,727) 
205,321  
(2,688,336)  
- 
136,000  
(170,045) 
213,150 

(600,631) 

 (194,002) 
(129,180)  
499  
 (8,576) 
 1,479 

 (930,411) 

 (593,314) 
- 
 (112,407) 
- 
75,000  
6,539,335  
- 

 5,908,614 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

         (1,812,397) 

         4,978,203 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Note 19) 

5,130,064  

151,861  

 $          3,317,667  

 $          5,130,064  

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

4 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

1.  CORPORATE INFORMATION 

Radius Gold Inc. (the “Company”) was formed by the amalgamation of Radius Explorations Ltd. and PilaGold Inc. 
effective on July 1, 2004 under the laws of British Columbia. 

The Company is engaged in acquisition and exploration of mineral properties and investment in companies which 
hold mineral property interests. The address of the Company’s head office and principal place of business is 650 – 
200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3L6.  

2.  BASIS OF PREPARATION 

These consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that the Company will continue as a going 
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  

Statement of Compliance 

These consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).  

Basis of Measurement 

These consolidated  financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis,  except for certain financial 
instruments measured at fair value. In addition, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the 
accrual basis of accounting, except for cash flow information. 

The consolidated  financial  statements  are presented in Canadian dollars (“CDN”),  which is the Company’s  and its 
subsidiaries’ functional currency. 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  compliance  with  IFRS  requires  management  to  make  certain  critical 
accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgment in applying the Company’s accounting policies. 
The areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant 
to the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 4. 

5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3. 

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

The  accounting  policies  set  out  below  have  been  applied  consistently  to  all  years  presented  in  these  consolidated 
financial statements. 

a)  Basis of Consolidation 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. A 
subsidiary is an entity in which the Company has control, directly or indirectly, where control is defined as the power 
to govern the financial and operating policies of an enterprise so as to obtain benefits from its activities. All material 
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. Subsidiaries are deconsolidated from 
the date control ceases. 

Details of the Company’s principal subsidiaries at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows: 

Name 

Minerales Sierra Pacifico S.A. 
Radius Gold (U.S.) Inc. 
Geometales Del Norte-Geonorte 
Radius (Cayman) Inc 

b)  Revenue Recognition 

Place of 
Incorporation 

Guatemala 
Nevada, USA 
Mexico 
Cayman Islands 

Interest 
% 

100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 

Principal Activity 

Exploration company 
Exploration company 
Exploration company 
Investment Holding company 

Royalty revenue is measured at fair value of the consideration received or receivable when the Company can reliably 
estimate  the  amount,  pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  royalty  agreement.  For  royalty  interests,  revenue  recognition 
generally occurs in the month of production from the royalty property. 

Royalty revenue may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal prices, weights, and assays. 
Adjustments  recorded  upon  final  settlement  are  offset  against  revenue  when  incurred.  Variations  between  the 
estimated price recorded upon production and the actual final price set upon final settlement are caused by changes 
in market commodity prices, and result in an embedded derivative in the receivable. The embedded derivative is 
recorded at fair value each period until final settlement occurs, with changes in fair value classified as provisional 
price adjustments and included as a component of royalty revenue. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was 
no embedded derivative. 

c)  Investment in Associates 

Where the Company has significant influence over the financial and operating policy decisions of another entity, it 
is classified as an associate. Associates are initially recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at 
cost. The Company's share of post-acquisition profits and losses is recognized in profit or loss, except that losses in 
excess of the Company’s investment in the associate are not recognized unless there is an obligation to fund those 
losses. 

Profits and losses arising on transactions between the Company and its associates are recognized only to the extent 
of unrelated investors' interests in the associate. The investor's share in the associate's profits and losses resulting 
from these transactions is eliminated against the carrying value of the associate. 

Any premium paid for an associate above the fair value of the Company's share of the identifiable assets, liabilities 
and contingent liabilities acquired is capitalized and included in the carrying amount of the associate. Adjustments 
to the carrying amount may also be necessary for changes in the Company's proportionate interest in the associate 
arising from changes in the associate's other comprehensive income. Such adjustments to the carrying amount are 
charged  to  operations  as  a  gain  or  loss  on  dilution  in  the  associate.  Where  there  is  objective  evidence  that  the 
investment in an associate has been impaired the carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment in the 
same way as other non-financial assets.  

6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

d)  Foreign Currency Translation 

The  functional  and  presentation  currency  of  the  Company  and  its  principal  subsidiaries  is  the  Canadian  dollar. 
Transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency are translated as follows: unsettled 
monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are translated into Canadian dollars at exchange rates prevailing 
at the date of the statement of financial position and non-monetary items are translated at exchange rates prevailing 
when the assets were acquired or obligations incurred. Foreign currency denominated revenue and expense items are 
translated  at  exchange  rates  prevailing  at  the  transaction  date.  Gains  or  losses  arising  from  the  translations  are 
included in profit or loss. 

e)  Cash and Cash Equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash at banks and on hand, and other short-term, highly liquid investments with 
original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and are subject to 
an insignificant risk of change of value.  

f)  Mineral and Royalty Interests 

Exploration and evaluation assets 

Acquisition costs for exploration and evaluation assets are capitalized and include the cash consideration paid and 
the fair value of common shares issued on acquisition, at the earlier of the date the counterparty’s performance is 
complete  or  the  share  issuance  date.  Exploration  expenditures,  net  of  recoveries,  are  charged  to  operations  as 
incurred. After a property is determined by management to be commercially feasible, exploration and development 
expenditures on the property will be capitalized. On transfer to development properties, capitalized exploration and 
evaluation assets are assessed for impairment. 

Options are exercisable entirely at the discretion of the optionee and amounts received from optionees in connection 
with option agreements are credited against the capitalized acquisition costs classified as exploration and evaluation 
assets on the statement of financial position and amounts received in excess are credited to gain from exploration 
and evaluation asset option agreements on the statement of income and comprehensive income. 

Where the Company has entered into option agreements to acquire interests in exploration and evaluation assets that 
provide for periodic payments or periodic share issuances, amounts unpaid and unissued are not recorded as liabilities 
since they are payable and issuable entirely at the Company’s option. Option payments are recorded as exploration 
and evaluation costs when the payments are made or received and the share issuances are recorded as exploration 
and  evaluation  costs  using  the  fair  market  value  of  the  Company’s  common  shares  at  the  earlier  of  the  date  the 
counterparty’s performance is complete or the share issuance date. 

The Company is in the process of exploring and developing its  exploration and evaluation assets and has not yet 
determined the amount of reserves available. Management reviews the carrying value of exploration and evaluation 
assets on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an 
asset  may  not  be  recoverable,  the  Company  will  test  the  asset  for  impairment  based  upon  a  variety  of  factors, 
including current exploration results, the prospect of further work being carried out by the Company, the assessment 
of  future  probability  of  profitable  revenues  from  the  asset  or  from  the  sale  of  the  asset.  Amounts  shown  for 
exploration and evaluation assets represent costs incurred net of write-downs and recoveries, and are not intended to 
represent present or future values. 

Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures 
that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and which do not contribute to current or future revenue 
generation  are  expensed.  Liabilities  are  recorded  when  environmental  assessments  and/or  remedial  efforts  are 
probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals would be when the actual 
environmental disturbance occurs.  

7 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

f)  Mineral Interests and Royalties – (cont’d) 

Royalties 

Royalty interests consist of acquired royalties in producing and exploration and evaluation stage properties. Royalty 
interests  are  recorded  at  cost  and  capitalized  as  tangible  assets.  They  are  subsequently  measured  at  cost  less 
accumulated  depletion  and  depreciation  and  accumulated  impairment  losses.  Producing  properties  are  those  that 
have generated revenue from steady-state operations for the Company. Exploration and evaluation stage properties 
represent early stage exploration properties that are speculative and are expected to require more than two years to 
generate revenue, if ever, or are currently not active. 

Producing  royalty  interests  are  recorded  at  cost  and  capitalized  in  accordance  with  IAS  16,  Property,  Plant  and 
Equipment.  Producing  royalty  interests  are  depleted  using  the  units-of-production  method  over  the  life  of  the 
property to which the interest relates, which is estimated using available estimates of proven and probable reserves 
specifically associated with the properties. Management relies on information available to it under contracts with the 
operators and/or public disclosures for information on proven and probable reserves and resources from the operators 
of the producing royalty interest. 

Royalty  interests  for  exploration  and  evaluation  assets,  such  as  the  Company’s  Bayovar  12  Project  Royalty,  are 
recorded at cost and capitalized in accordance with IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. 
Acquisition costs of exploration and evaluation royalty interests are capitalized and are not depleted until such time 
as revenue-generating activities begin. 

g)  Property, Equipment and Amortization 

Recognition and Measurement 

On initial recognition, property and equipment are valued at cost, being the purchase price and directly attributable 
costs of acquisition required to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary to be capable of operating in 
a manner intended by the Company, including appropriate borrowing costs and the estimated present value of any 
future  unavoidable  costs  of  dismantling  and  removing  items.  The  corresponding  liability  is  recognized  within 
provisions. 

Property  and  equipment  is  subsequently  measured  at  cost  less  accumulated  amortization,  less  any  accumulated 
impairment losses, with the exception of land, which is not amortized. 

When parts of an item of property and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items 
(major components) of property and equipment. 

Gains and Losses 

Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from 
disposal with the carrying amount, that are recognized net within other income in profit or loss. 

Amortization 

Amortization is recognized in profit or loss and property and equipment is amortized over their estimated useful lives 
using the following methods: 

Leasehold improvements 
Trucks 
Computer equipment 
Field equipment 
Furniture and equipment 
Geophysical equipment 

7 – 8 years straight-line 
4 – 8 years straight-line 
25% - 50% declining balance 
30% declining balance 
20% declining balance 
20% declining balance 

8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

h)  Earnings / Loss per Share 

Basic income/loss per share is calculated by dividing the net income/loss available to common shareholders by the 
weighted average  number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential 
dilution of securities that could share in earnings of the Company.  

For  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  potentially  dilutive  common  shares  (relating  to  options 
outstanding at year-end) totalling 5,070,000 were not included in the computation of earnings/loss per share, because 
their effect was anti-dilutive. As such, basic and diluted earnings and losses per share were the same for that periods 
presented. 

i) 

Income Taxes 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current and deferred tax are recognized in net loss/income 
except  to  the  extent  that  it  relates  to  a  business  combination  or  items  recognized  directly  in  equity  or  in  other 
comprehensive loss/income. 

Current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable or receivable on taxable income or loss 
for the current year and any adjustment to income taxes payable in respect of previous years. Current income taxes 
are determined using tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the year-end date. 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized where the carrying amount of an asset or liability differs from its 
tax base, except for those taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill or on the initial 
recognition  of  an  asset  or  liability  in  a  transaction  which  is  not  a  business  combination  and  at  the  time  of  the 
transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss. 

Recognition of deferred tax assets for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences is restricted 
to those instances where it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deferred tax asset 
can be utilized. At the end of each reporting year the Company reassesses unrecognized deferred tax assets. The 
Company recognizes a previously unrecognized deferred tax asset only to the extent that it has become probable that 
future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. 

j)  Share Capital 

Equity instruments are contracts that give a residual interest in the net assets of the Company. Financial instruments 
issued by the Company are classified as equity only to the extent that they do not meet the definition of a financial 
liability  or  financial  asset.  The  Company’s  common  shares,  share  warrants,  and  options  are  classified  as  equity 
instruments. 

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net 
of tax, from proceeds. 

Warrants issued by the Company typically accompany an issuance of shares in the Company (a “Unit”), and entitle 
the warrant holder to exercise the warrants for a stated price and a stated number of common shares in the Company. 
The fair value of the Unit’s components sold is measured using the residual value approach. The proceeds received 
are first allocated to common shares at the time the units are priced, and any excess is allocated to warrants.  

9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

k)  Share-based Payments 

Where equity-settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is 
charged to profit or loss over the vesting period. Performance vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting 
the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount 
recognized over the vesting period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. As long as all other vesting 
conditions  are  satisfied,  a  charge  is  made  irrespective  of  whether  these  vesting  conditions  are  satisfied.  The 
cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition or where a non-vesting condition 
is not satisfied. 

Where terms and conditions of options are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of the options, 
measured immediately before and after the modification, is also charged to profit or loss over the remaining vesting 
period. 

Where  equity  instruments  are  granted  to  employees,  they  are  recorded  at  the  fair  value  of  the  equity  instrument 
granted at the grant date. The grant date fair value is recognized in profit or loss over the vesting period, described 
as the period during which all the vesting conditions are to be satisfied. 

Where equity instruments are granted to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services 
received in profit or loss. Options or warrants granted related to the issuance of shares are recorded as a reduction of 
share capital. 

When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, 
the fair value is measured by use of a valuation model or the fair value of the shares granted. 

All equity-settled share-based payments are reflected in other equity reserve, until exercised. Upon exercise, shares 
are issued from treasury and the amount reflected in other equity reserve is credited to share capital, adjusted for any 
consideration paid. 

Where  a  grant  of  options  is  cancelled  or  settled  during  the  vesting  period,  excluding  forfeitures  when  vesting 
conditions are not satisfied, the Company immediately accounts for the cancellation as an acceleration of vesting 
and recognizes the amount that otherwise would have been recognized for services received over the remainder of 
the vesting period. Any payment made to the employee on the cancellation is accounted for as the repurchase of an 
equity interest except to the extent the payment exceeds the fair value of the equity instrument granted, measured at 
the repurchase date. Any such excess is recognized as an expense. 

l)  Provisions 

Rehabilitation Provision 

The Company is subject to various government laws and regulations relating to environmental disturbances caused 
by exploration and evaluation activities. The Company records the present value of the estimated costs of legal and 
constructive obligations required to restore the exploration sites in the year in which the obligation is incurred. The 
nature  of  the  rehabilitation  activities  may  include  restoration,  reclamation  and  revegetation  of  the  affected 
exploration sites. 

The rehabilitation provision generally arises when the environmental disturbance is subject to government laws and 
regulations. When the liability is recognized, the present value of the estimated costs is capitalized by increasing the 
carrying amount of the related exploration properties. Over time, the discounted liability is increased for the changes 
in present value based on current market discount rates and liability specific risks. 

As at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no significant asset retirement or rehabilitation obligations. 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

l)  Provisions – (cont’d) 

Other Provisions 

Provisions are recognized where a legal or constructive obligation has been incurred as a result of past events, it is 
probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefit will be required to settle the obligation, and a 
reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made. If material, provisions are measured at the present 
value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation. The increase in any provision due to passage 
of time is recognized as accretion expense. 

m)  Impairment of Non-Financial Assets 

Impairment tests on non-financial assets, including exploration and evaluation assets are undertaken whenever events 
or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Where the carrying value 
of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposal, 
the asset is written down accordingly. 

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried out 
on the asset’s cash-generating unit, which is the lowest group of assets in which the asset belongs for which there 
are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets.  

An impairment loss is charged to the profit or loss, except to the extent they reverse gains previously recognized in 
other comprehensive loss/income. 

n)  Financial Instruments 

Financial Assets 

Financial assets are classified into one of the following  categories based on the purpose for  which the asset  was 
acquired.  All  transactions  related  to  financial  instruments  are  recorded  on  a  trade  date  basis.  The  Company’s 
accounting policy for each category is as follows: 

Loans and Receivables 

These assets are non-derivative financial assets resulting from the delivery of cash or other assets by a lender to a 
borrower in return for a promise to repay on a specified date or dates, or on demand. They are initially recognized at 
fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue and subsequently carried at 
amortized cost, using the effective interest rate  method, less any impairment losses. Amortized cost is calculated 
taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and includes fees that are an integral part of the effective 
interest rate and transactions costs. Gains or losses are recognized in profit or loss when the loans and receivables 
are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process. 

Available-For-Sale Investments 

Non-derivative financial assets not included in the other categories are classified as available-for-sale and comprise 
principally the Company’s strategic investments in entities not qualifying as subsidiaries or associates. Available-
for-sale  investments  are  carried  at  fair  value  with  changes  in  fair  value  recognized  in  accumulated  other 
comprehensive income. Where there is a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an available-for-sale 
financial asset (which constitutes objective evidence of impairment), the full amount of the impairment, including 
any  amount  previously  recognized  in  other  comprehensive  loss/income,  is  recognized  in  profit  or  loss.  Any 
subsequent increase in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are recorded through other comprehensive 
income. If there is no quoted market price in an active market and fair value cannot be readily determined, available-
for-sale investments are carried at cost. 

Purchases and sales of available-for-sale financial assets are recognized on a trade date basis. On sale or impairment, 
the  cumulative  amount  recognized  in  other  comprehensive  loss/income  is  reclassified  from  accumulated  other 
comprehensive income to profit or loss. 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

n)  Financial Instruments – (cont’d) 

Financial Assets at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss 

Derivative investments, such as warrants and receivables related to agreements with provisional pricing mechanisms, 
are classified as fair value through profit and loss and are recognized initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial 
recognition,  derivatives  are  measured  at  fair  value  and  changes  in  fair  value  are  recognized  as  other  income 
(expenses) in the statement of income and comprehensive income. 

Impairment of Financial Assets 

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group 
of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired, if, and only 
if,  there  is  objective  evidence  of  impairment  as  a  result  of  one  or  more  events  that  has  occurred  after  the  initial 
recognition of the asset and that event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group 
of financial assets. 

Financial Liabilities 

Financial  liabilities  are  classified  as  other  financial  liabilities,  based  on  the  purpose  for  which  the  liability  was 
incurred, and comprise accounts payables and accrued liabilities. These liabilities are initially recognized at fair value 
net  of  any  transaction  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  issuance  of  the  instrument  and  subsequently  carried  at 
amortized cost using the effective interest rate  method. This ensures that any interest expense over the period of 
repayment is at a constant rate on the balance of the liability carried in the statement of financial position. Interest 
expense,  in  this  context,  includes  initial  transaction  costs  and  premiums  payable  on  redemption,  as  well  as  any 
interest or coupon payable while the liability is outstanding. 

Accounts payables represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Company prior to the end of the period 
which  are  unpaid.  Accounts  payable  amounts  are  unsecured  and  are  usually  paid  within  forty-five  days  of 
recognition. 

The Company has made the following designations of its financial instruments: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Available-for-sale investments 
Receivables  
Due from related parties 
Deposits 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Derivative instruments 

  Fair value through profit or loss 
  Available-for-sale financial assets 
  Loans and receivables 
  Loans and receivables 
  Loans and receivables 
  Other financial liabilities 

Fair value through profit or loss 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

o)  Standards, Amendments and Interpretations Not Yet Effective 

The Company will be required to adopt the following standards and amendments issued by the IASB as described 
below.  The  Company  is  in  the  process  of  evaluating  the  impact  of  these  new  standards  and  amendments  on  its 
consolidated financial statements: 

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments  

IFRS 9  will replace IAS 39  Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and IFRIC 9 Reassessment of 
Embedded Derivatives. The final version of this new  standard supersedes the requirements of earlier versions of 
IFRS 9.  

The main features introduced by this new standard compared with predecessor IFRS are as follows: 

•  Classification and measurement of financial assets: 

Debt instruments are classified and measured on the basis of the entity's business model for managing the asset 
and its contractual cash flow characteristics as either: “amortized cost”, “fair value through other comprehensive 
income”, or “fair value through profit or loss” (default). Equity instruments are classified and measured as “fair 
value through profit or loss” unless upon initial recognition elected to be classified as “fair value through other 
comprehensive income”.  

•  Classification and measurement of financial liabilities: 

When an entity elects to measure a financial liability at fair value, gains or losses due to changes in the entity’s 
own credit risk is recognized in other comprehensive income (as opposed to previously profit or loss). This 
change may be adopted early in isolation of the remainder of IFRS 9.  

• 

Impairment of financial assets: 
An expected credit loss impairment model replaced the incurred loss model and is applied to financial assets at 
“amortized cost” or “fair value through other comprehensive income”, lease receivables, contract assets or loan 
commitments and financial guarantee contracts. An entity recognizes twelve-month expected credit losses if the 
credit risk of a financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition and lifetime expected 
credit losses otherwise. 

•  Hedge accounting: 

Hedge  accounting  remains  a  choice,  however,  is  now  available  for  a  broader  range  of  hedging  strategies. 
Voluntary termination of a hedging relationship is no longer permitted. Effectiveness testing now needs to be 
performed prospectively only. Entities may elect to continue applying IAS 39 hedge accounting on adoption of 
IFRS  9  (until  the  IASB  has  completed  its  separate  project on  the  accounting  for  open  portfolios  and  macro 
hedging). 

Effective for the Company's annual period beginning January 1, 2018. The Company expects the above standard to 
have a significant impact on the presentation of the consolidated financial statements and is currently in the process 
of evaluating its impact on the consolidated financial statements.  

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers  

IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers specifies how and when revenue should be recognized as well as 
requiring more informative and relevant disclosures. The standard supersedes IAS 18 Revenue, IAS 11 Construction 
Contracts, and a number of revenue-related interpretations. Application of the standard is mandatory and it applies 
to nearly all contracts with customers: the main exceptions are leases, financial instruments and insurance contracts. 
IFRS 15 is effective for the Company’s annual period beginning January 1, 2018. 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

3.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (cont’d) 

o)  Standards, Amendments and Interpretations Not Yet Effective – (cont’d) 

IFRS 16 Leases  

On January 13, 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 Leases, which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for 
most leases. For lessors, there is little change to the existing accounting in IAS 17 Leases. The new standard will be 
effective for the Company’s annual period beginning January 1, 2019. Early application is permitted, provided the 
new revenue standard, IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, has been applied, or is applied at the same 
date as IFRS 16.  

IFRIC Interpretation 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration.  

On  December  8,  2016,  the  IASB  issued  IFRIC  Interpretation  22  Foreign  Currency  Transactions  and  Advance 
Consideration.  The  Interpretation  clarifies  which  date  should  be  used  for  translation  when  a  foreign  currency 
transaction involves an advance payment or receipt. The Interpretation is applicable for the Company’s annual period 
beginning January 1, 2018. The Interpretation clarifies that the date of the transaction for the purpose of determining 
the exchange rate to use on initial recognition of the related asset, expense or income (or part of it) is the date on 
which an entity initially recognizes the non-monetary asset or non-monetary liability arising from the payment or 
receipt of advance consideration.  

Effective for the Company’s annual period beginning January 1, 2018. 

Classification  and  Measurement  of  Share-based  Payment  Transactions  (Amendments  to  IFRS  2  Share-based 
Payment) 

The amendments provide guidance on the accounting for: 

•  the effects of vesting and non-vesting conditions on the measurement of cash-settled share-based payments; 
•  share-based payment transactions with a net settlement feature for withholding tax obligations; and 
•  a modification to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment that changes the classification of the 

transaction from cash-settled to equity-settled. 

Effective for the Company’s annual period beginning January 1, 2018. 

4.  CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS 

The  Company  makes  estimates  and  assumptions  about  the  future  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and 
liabilities.  Estimates  and  judgments  are  continually  evaluated  based  on  historical  experience  and  other  factors, 
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In the  future, 
actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions. 

The effect of a change in an accounting estimate is recognized prospectively by including it in profit or loss in the 
period of the change, if the change affects that period only, or in the period of the change and future periods, if the 
change affects both. 

The key areas of judgment applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that could result in a 
material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are as follows: 

a)  Where the Company holds the largest shareholding in an investment and has the power to exercise significant 
influence  through  common  officers  and  board  members,  such  an  investment  is  treated  as  an  associate.  The 
Company can exercise significant influence over Rackla Metals Inc. (“Rackla”); 

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

4.  CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS – (cont’d) 

b)  The determination of when an investment is impaired requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, 
the Company evaluates, amongst other things, the duration and extent to which the fair value of the investment 
is less than its original cost at each reporting period; 

c)  The  functional  currency  for  each  of  the  Company’s  subsidiaries  is  the  currency  of  the  primary  economic 
environment  in  which  the  entity  operates.  Determination  of  the  functional  currency  may  involve  certain 
judgments to determine the primary economic environment and the Company reconsiders functional currency 
of its entities if there is a change in events and conditions which determined the primary economic environment;  

d)  The application of the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets requires judgment in 

determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to the Company. 
If, after exploration and evaluation assets  are  capitalized,  information becomes available suggesting that the 
carrying amount of an exploration and evaluation asset may exceed its recoverable amount, the Company carries 
out an impairment test at the cash generating unit or group of cash generating units level in the year the new 
information becomes available; and 

e)  The determination of when receivables are impaired requires significant judgment as to their collectability. 

The key estimates applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements that could result in a material 
adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities are as follows: 

a)  The  Company  is  subject  to  income  tax  in  several  jurisdictions  and  significant  judgment  is  required  in 
determining the provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and 
calculations  for  which  the  ultimate  tax  determination  is  uncertain.  As  a  result,  the  Company  recognizes  tax 
liabilities  based  on  estimates  of  whether  additional  taxes  and  interest  will  be  due.  These  tax  liabilities  are 
recognized when, despite the Company's belief that its tax return positions are supportable, the company believes 
that certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. 
The  Company  believes  that  its  accruals  for  tax  liabilities  are  adequate  for  all  open  audit  years  based  on  its 
assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on 
estimates and assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events. To the extent 
that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact 
income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. 

b)  The Company accounts for royalty revenue on an accrual basis which requires forecasting of gold prices and 

use of preliminary assay and weight results to estimate revenue prior to final settlement. 

c) 

In estimating the fair value of share-based payments, and derivative instruments, using the Black-Scholes option 
pricing  model,  management  is required to  make certain assumptions and estimates.  Changes in assumptions 
used to estimate fair value could result in materially different results. 

5.  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 

Cash  and  cash  equivalents  are  held  for  the  purpose  of  meeting  short-term  cash  commitments  rather  than  for 
investment or other purposes. The Company does not hold any deposits with maturities of greater than three months 
from the date of acquisition. Cash at banks and on hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit 
rates.  

As at December 31, 
Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of: 

Cash  
Cash equivalents 

2017 
 $      2,858,611  
459,056  
 $      3,317,667  

2016 
 $      2,644,302  
2,485,762  
 $      5,130,064  

15 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

6. 

INVESTMENTS 

Available-for-sale investments that are publicly traded are recorded at fair value and investments in which there is 
no quoted market price in an active market are carried at cost. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, available-for-
sale investments consisted of the following: 

Number of common shares held as at December 31: 

Advantage Lithium Corp. (“Advantage”) 
CROPS Inc. (formerly Focus Ventures Ltd.) (“CROPS”) 
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (“Fortuna”) 
GrowMax Resources Corp. (“GrowMax”) 
Medgold Resources Corp. (“Medgold”) 
Southern Silver Exploration Corp. (“Southern Silver”) 
ValGold Resources Ltd (“ValGold”) 
Volcanic Gold Mines Inc. (“Volcanic”) 
War Eagle Mining Company Inc. (formerly Champagne 
Resources Limited) (“War Eagle”) 

 2017 

2016 

-  
2,564,027  
239,385  
1,200,000  
10,040,000  
1,407,000  
1,000,000 
3,222,883  

250,000  
1,272,102  
-  
500,000  
10,040,000  
1,500,000  
- 
-  

625,000  

625,000  

Balance, December 31, 2015 

 $                -  

 $  3,626,000  

 $     326,417  

 $                -  

 $              -  

 $                -  

Advantage 

B2Gold 

CROPS 

Fortuna 

GrowMax 

Medgold 

225,000  

-  

172,958  

 (3,626,000) 

-  

Acquisition of shares 

Disposition of shares 

Impairment adjustment  
Reclassification as investment in 
associate (Note 9) 
Net change in fair value recorded in 
  other comprehensive income 

Balance, December 31, 2016 

Acquisition of shares 

Disposition of shares 

Impairment adjustment  
Net change in fair value recorded in 
  other comprehensive income 

-  

-  

-  

17,500  

242,500  

-  

 (95,000) 

 (130,000) 

(17,500) 

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

1,472,218  

-  

-  

70,355  

300,000  

-  

-  

- 

7,145  

77,500  

81,649  

-  

-  

-  

-  

1,095,600 

261,000  

1,656,600 

-  

-  

-  

 (205,321) 

-  

(14,192) 

279,862  

229,481  

-  

 (252,940) 

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

98,148  

(33,149) 

(50,200)  

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $                -  

 $                -  

 $     256,403  

 $  1,570,366  

 $   126,000  

$   1,606,400 

Southern 
Silver 

ValGold 

Volcanic 

War Eagle 

Total 

Balance, December 31, 2015 

 $     300,000  

 $                -  

 $                -  

 $                -  

 $  4,252,417  

Acquisition of shares 

Disposition of shares 

Impairment adjustment  

Reclassification as investment in associate (Note 9) 
Net change in fair value recorded in other 
  comprehensive income 

Balance, December 31, 2016 

Acquisition of shares 

Disposition of shares 

Impairment adjustment  
Net change in fair value recorded in other 
  comprehensive income 

-  

 (225,000) 

-  

-  

412,500  

487,500  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

65,000  

1,181,764  

 (4,650) 

-  

-  

-  

-  

 (456,615) 

51,810  

5,000  

-  

50,000  

818,313  

-  

-  

-  

-  

50,000  

-  

-  

- 

-  

 (3,851,000) 

 (205,321) 

1,095,600  

683,953  

2,793,962  

3,030,112  

 (99,650) 

 (839,555) 

54,109  

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $     534,660  

 $       70,000  

 $     725,149  

 $     50,000  

 $  4,938,978  

16 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
                
                         
              
                         
                  
              
                         
                         
                
              
 
  
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

6. 

INVESTMENTS – (cont’d) 

CROPS and Fortuna each have two common directors with the Company. Medgold and Volcanic each have one 
common director with the Company. All companies are publicly listed companies with the exception of War Eagle 
which was a private company as of December 31, 2017. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, Champagne completed 
a merger with War Eagle Mining Company Inc.  whereby the 625,000 common shares of Champagne held by the 
Company were converted to 233,781 common shares of War Eagle. War Eagle is a publicly listed company. Also 
subsequent  to  December  31,  2017,  CROPS  changed  its  name  from  Focus  Ventures  Ltd.  and  completed  a  share 
consolidation so that every four existing common shares of CROPS were exchanged for one new common share of 
CROPS. 

As at December 31, 2017, the fair value based on published market prices of the available-for-sale investments that 
are publicly listed was $4,888,978 (2016: $2,743,962) and the cost of the War Eagle available-for-sale investment 
was $50,000 (2016: $50,000). 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, impairment charges of $130,000 and $456,615 were recorded against the 
Advantage and Volcanic shares, respectively, due to their fair value declining significantly below their cost base and 
an impairment charge of $252,940 was recorded against the CROPS shares due to the fair value of the shares being 
less than the cost base (2016: an impairment charge of $205,321 was recorded against the CROPS shares). 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed the following transactions: 

i)  Sold 93,000 shares of Southern Silver for net proceeds of $41,188 and recorded a gain of $36,538; 

ii)  Purchased  685,675  units  of  a  CROPS  private  placement  at  a  cost  of  $137,135.  Each  unit  consists  of  one 
common share of CROPS and one share purchase warrant; each full warrant entitling the Company to purchase 
one additional common share of CROPS at $0.40 for five years. The 685,675 share purchase warrants acquired 
in this private placement are recorded as a derivative investment as of December 31, 2017 with a corresponding 
gain of $30,717 being charged to operations. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-
Scholes option pricing model with inputs being an expected volatility factor of 77%; risk-free interest rate of 
1.81%, expected life of 4.22 years, and expected dividend yield of 0%. The CROPS share purchase warrants are 
not tradable on an exchange; 

iii)  Purchased 606,250 common shares of CROPS in the open market at a cost of $92,346; 

iv)  Received 1,263,883 common shares of Volcanic with a fair value of $606,664 at the time of issuance, pursuant 

to a mineral property assignment agreement described below; 

v)  Received 239,385 common shares of Fortuna with a fair value of $1,472,218 at the time of issuance, pursuant 

to a sale of a mineral property (Note 10); 

vi)  Purchased  834,000  units  of  a  Volcanic  private  placement  at  a  cost  of  $125,100.  Each  unit  consists  of  one 
common share of Volcanic and one-half share purchase  warrant; each full  warrant entitling the Company to 
purchase one additional common share of Volcanic at $0.25 for one year. The Volcanic share purchase warrants 
are not tradable on an exchange. The 417,000 share purchase warrants acquired in this private placement are 
recorded as a derivative investment with a gain of $1,255 being  charged to operations. The fair value of the 
warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with inputs being an expected volatility 
factor of 89%; risk-free interest rate of 1.66%, expected life of 0.01 years, and expected dividend yield of 0%.;  

vii)  Purchased  1,125,000  units  of  a  Volcanic  private  placement  at  a  cost  of $450,000. Each  unit  consists  of  one 
common share of Volcanic and one share purchase warrant; each full warrant entitling the Company to purchase 
one  additional  common  share  of  Volcanic  at  $0.80  for  five  years.  The  1,125,000  share  purchase  warrants 
acquired in this private placement are recorded as a derivative investment with a gain of $106,457 being charged 
to operations. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with 
inputs being an expected volatility factor of 89%; risk-free interest rate of 1.81%, expected life of 4.19 years, 
and expected dividend yield of 0%. The Volcanic share purchase warrants are not tradable on an exchange; 

17 

 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

6. 

INVESTMENTS – (cont’d) 

viii) Purchased 700,000 common shares of GrowMax in the open market at a cost of $81,649; 

ix)  Purchased  1,000,000  units  of  a  ValGold  private  placement  at  a  cost  of  $65,000.  Each  unit  consists  of  one 
common share of ValGold and one share purchase warrant; each full warrant entitling the Company to purchase 
one  additional  common  share  of  ValGold  at  $0.10  for  two  years.  The  1,000,000  share  purchase  warrants 
acquired in this private placement are recorded as a derivative investment with a gain of $58,301 being charged 
to operations. The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with 
inputs being an expected volatility factor of 221%; risk-free interest rate of 1.68%, expected life of 1.76 years, 
and expected dividend yield of 0%. The ValGold share purchase warrants are not tradable on an exchange; and 

x)  Sold in the open market 250,000 common shares of Advantage for net proceeds of $262,808 and recorded a gain 

of $167,808. 

xi)  The 312,500 share purchase warrants of War Eagle acquired in the year ended December 31, 2016, are recorded 
as a derivative investment with a gain of $7,522 being charged to operations. The fair value of the warrants are 
determined  using  the  Black-Scholes  option  pricing  model  with  inputs  being  an  expected  volatility  factor  of 
100%; risk-free interest rate of 1.68%, expected life of 1.50 years, and expected dividend yield of 0%. The War 
Eagle share purchase warrants are not tradeable on an exchange. 

The Company also held as at December 31, 2017, 3,973,275 free trading common shares of Rackla with a fair value 
of $456,927 as of December 31, 2017 but they are recorded as an investment in associate (Note 9). 

Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company completed the following transactions: 

i)  Purchased in the open market 86,500 common shares of Medgold at a cost of $18,064; and 

ii)  Sold in the open market 147,500 common shares of Southern Silver for net proceeds of $39,487. 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company completed the following transactions: 

i)  Sold its remaining 2,590,000 shares of B2Gold for net proceeds of $5,724,827 and recorded a gain on sale of 

available-for-sale investments of $2,098,827; 

ii)  Purchased 192,500 units of a CROPS private placement at a cost of $50,050. Each unit consists of one common 
share of CROPS and one share purchase  warrant; each  full  warrant entitling  the Company to purchase one 
additional common share of CROPS at $0.30 for one year. The CROPS share purchase warrants are not tradable 
on an exchange; 

iii)  Acquired 192,500 CROPS shares upon the exercise of 192,500 share purchase warrants at a cost of $57,750, 

and 177,500 shares acquired on the open market at a cost of $65,158; 

iv)  Sold 4,500,000 shares of Southern Silver for net proceeds of $814,508 and recorded a gain of $589,508; 

v)  Received 250,000 common shares of Advantage with a fair value of $225,000 at the time of receipt, pursuant to 

a mineral property option agreement entered into during the year (Note 10); 

vi)  Acquired 500,000 common shares of GrowMax Resources Corp in the open market at a cost of $70,355; and 

vii)  Purchased  625,000  units  of  a  Champagne  private  placement  at  a  cost  of  $50,000.  Each  unit  consists  of  one 
common share of War Eagle and one-half share purchase warrant; each full warrant entitling the Company to 
purchase one additional common share of Champagne at $0.15 until eighteen months after Champagne becomes 
publicly listed.  

18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

6. 

INVESTMENTS – (cont’d) 

In 2016, the Company entered into an assignment agreement with Volcanic, pursuant to which the Company assigned 
to Volcanic a purchase agreement to acquire the Mandiana project, a gold property located in Guinea, from Sovereign 
Mines  of  Africa  PLC  (“SMA”).  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  the  transaction  was  completed  and 
Volcanic acquired all of the outstanding share capital of SMA's wholly owned subsidiary, Sovereign Mines of Africa 
Ltd. (“Sovereign Mines”). In consideration for the assignment by the Company, Volcanic issued 1,263,883 of its 
common shares to the Company upon completion of the transaction (note 6(iv)). Volcanic also agreed to reimburse 
the Company for certain expenses incurred in the development of the transaction and granted to the Company certain 
rights to participate in future equity financings completed by Volcanic. Each of SMA, Sovereign Mines and Volcanic 
were at arm's length to the Company at the time of the transaction. As at December 31, 2017, the Company and 
Volcanic have one common director. 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s holding of 8,040,000 Medgold shares was reclassified 
from an investment in associate to an available-for-sale investment (Note 9). The fair value of the 8,040,000 Medgold 
shares  at  the  time  of  reclassification  was  $1,095,600.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2016  and  after  the 
reclassification, the Company acquired an additional 2,000,000 shares of Medgold upon the exercise of 2,000,000 
share purchase warrants at a cost of $300,000, bringing the total amount of Medgold shares held as of December 31, 
2016 and 2017 to 10,040,000. 

7.  RECEIVABLES 

December 31, 
2017 

December 31, 
2016 

Royalty revenue receivable 
Provision for impairment (Note 10 – Guatemala Tambor Project) 
Royalty revenue receivable, net 
Sales taxes 
Other receivables 

 $         784,180  
 (784,180) 
- 
70,945  
7,807  

 $         784,180  
 (784,180) 
- 
34,253  
160,333  

 $           78,752 

 $         194,586 

The provision for impairment of the royalty receivable was included in profit or loss during the year ended December 
31, 2016. Uncollectable amounts included in the provision are written off against the provision when there is no 
expectation of recovery. The royalty revenue receivable was uncollected as of December 31, 2016 and 2017 as the 
Company has allowed Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”) to defer payment of the balance while KCA prepares 
a legal strategy to overturn the suspension of operations of its mine-site and seek compensation from the Guatemalan 
authorities, from which the Company would seek to benefit as well (Note 10).  

19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

8.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 

Leasehold 
improvements 

Trucks 

Computer 
equipment 

Furniture 
and 
equipment 

Geophysical 
equipment 

Field 
equipment 

Total 

Cost 

Balance, December 31, 2015 

 $     62,762  

 $ 215,638  

 $ 252,068  

 $     62,656  

 $   84,882  

 $     2,480  

 $   680,486  

Balance, December 31, 2016 

62,762  

215,638  

252,068  

62,656  

84,882  

2,480  

680,486  

Additions 

-  

37,457  

-  

-  

-  

-  

37,457 

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $     62,762  

 $ 253,095  

 $ 252,068  

 $     62,656  

 $   84,882  

 $     2,480  

 $   717,943  

Accumulated amortization 

Balance, December 31, 2015 

 $     42,367  

 $ 208,680  

 $ 232,085  

 $     49,653  

 $   67,409  

 $     2,126  

 $   602,320  

Charge for year 

6,300  

6,958  

5,901  

2,052  

3,495  

106  

24,812  

Balance, December 31, 2016 

48,667  

215,638  

237,986  

51,705  

70,904  

2,232  

627,132  

Charge for year 

6,300  

4,173  

4,225  

2,191  

2,795  

74  

19,758  

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $     54,967  

 $ 219,811  

 $ 242,211  

 $     53,896  

 $   73,699  

 $     2,306  

 $   646,890  

Carrying amounts 

At December 31, 2016 

 $     14,095  

 $            -  

 $   14,082  

 $     10,951  

 $   13,978  

 $        248  

 $     53,354  

At December 31, 2017 

 $       7,795  

 $  33,284  

 $     9,857  

 $       8,760  

 $   11,183  

 $        174 

 $     71,053  

20 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

9. 

INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES 

Medgold 

As at December 31, 2017, the Company held 10,040,000 (2016: 10,040,000) common shares of Medgold, representing 
11.2% of Medgold’s outstanding common shares. 

Medgold  previously  met  the  definition  of  an  associate  and  was  equity  accounted  for  in  the  consolidated  financial 
statements. During the year ended December 31, 2016, Medgold no longer met the definition of an associate when the 
Company’s interest in Medgold was further diluted to a level significantly below 20% on June 17, 2016 when Medgold 
issued 10,000,000 common shares by way of a private placement to a third party. Therefore, the Company’s investment 
in Medgold was reclassified as an available-for-sale investment. Upon discontinuing the use of the equity method, an 
investment, if a financial asset, is to be measured at fair value and the difference between the fair value and the carrying 
value  of  the  investment  recognized  in  profit  or  loss.  The  fair  value  of  the  investment  in  Medgold  as  at  the  time  of 
reclassification was $1,095,600 and its carrying cost was $403,873. As a result, a gain of $691,727 was recognized in 
the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2016.  

From January 1, 2016 and until the point of reclassification to an available-for-sale investment during the year ended 
December 31, 2016, the Company’s shareholdings in Medgold decreased from 15.5% to 12.6% as a result of an increase 
in the issued capital of Medgold. Accordingly, the Company recorded a gain on dilution of $170,045 for the year ended 
December 31, 2016.  

The following table shows the continuity of the Company’s interest in Medgold for the period from January 1, 2016 to 
December 31, 2016: 

Balance, December 31, 2015 
Less: share of losses in associate 

Gain on dilution 
Reclassification to an available-for-sale investment 

Balance, December 31, 2016  

The financial statement balances of Medgold were as follows: 

Total current assets 
Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Net loss(2) 

 $              369,828  
(136,000)  

170,045 
(403,873) 

 $                          -  

June 30, 
2016(1) 

 $          1,507,091  
$          2,039,702  
$             497,674 
$          1,016,621  

(1)  June 30, 2016 was the last financial statements of Medgold used for the accounting treatment as an investment in associate. 
(2)  Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2016. 

21 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

9. 

INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATES – (cont’d) 

Rackla 

As at December 31, 2017, the Company held 3,973,275 (2016: 2,973,275) common shares of Rackla, representing 19.8% 
(2016:  19.7%)  of  Rackla’s  outstanding  common  shares.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  the  Company 
exercised its 1,000,000 share purchase warrants for 1,000,000 common shares of Rackla at a cost of $50,000. The Rackla 
share purchase warrants were not tradable on an exchange. 

Rackla meets the definition of an associate and has been equity accounted for in the consolidated financial statements.  

The following table shows the continuity of the Company’s interest in Rackla for the period from January 1, 2016 to 
December 31, 2017: 

Balance, December 31, 2015 and 2016 
Increase in investment 
Less: share of losses in associate 

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $                       1  
50,000  
(50,000)  

 $                       1  

Prior to the 2015 fiscal year the Company’s share of losses in Rackla exceeded  the carrying value of its interest and 
therefore  the  Company  discontinued  recognizing  its  share  of  further  losses.  During  the  2017  fiscal  year,  with  the 
additional 1,000,000 common shares being purchased at a cost of $50,000, the Company recognized losses in Rackla 
totaling $50,000 and once again reduced the carrying amount to a nominal $1 as at December 31, 2017. The cumulative 
unrecognized share of losses for the associate is $567,382. 

The financial statement balances of Rackla are as follows: 

Total current assets 
Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Net loss 

December 31, 
2017 

December 31, 
2016 

 $            250,862  
$            316,474  
$            225,230  
$            130,627  

 $            36,537  
$          104,597  
$          133,476  
$          219,288  

At December 31, 2017, the fair value of the 3,973,275 common shares of Rackla was $456,927 (2016: $445,991 fair 
value of 2,973,275 common shares).  

22 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

10.  MINERAL INTERESTS AND ROYALTIES 

Acquisition costs 

Balance, December 31, 2015 

Additions - cash 
Acquisition costs recovered 

Balance, December 31, 2016 

Additions - cash 
Write-off acquisition costs 

Peru  United States 

Guatemala 

Mexico 

Total 

 $      1,259,505  
-  
-  

 $                  -  
88,659  
-  

 $                  1  
-  
-  

 $                -  
23,748  
 (23,748) 

 $    1,259,506  
112,407  
 (23,748) 

1,259,505  
-  
- 

88,659  
117,816  
(69,187) 

1  
-  
- 

-  
13,348  
- 

1,348,165  
131,164  
(69,187) 

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $     1,259,505  

 $      137,288  

 $                  1  

 $      13,348  

 $    1,410,142  

USA 

i)  Bald Peak Property 

In  February  2017,  the  Company  acquired  a  100%  interest  in  the  Bald  Peak  gold  property  from  Nevada  Select 
Royalty, Inc. (“Nevada Select”) in consideration of a cash payment to Nevada Select of $46,032 (US$35,115), the 
granting to Nevada Select and/or a former property owner, of a total 3% NSR royalty, and making annual advance 
royalty payments to Nevada Select of US$25,000. The advance royalty payments become payable on the date the 
Company receives a drill permit for the property and on each annual anniversary thereof so long as the Company 
holds title to the property. The Company has the right to reduce either royalty by 1% by paying US$1.0 million to 
Nevada Select, and/or US$500,000 to the former owner. 

Subsequent to its agreement with Nevada Select, the Company staked an additional 113 unpatented mining claims 
at a cost of $71,784, increasing the land position of the Bald Peak Property to 151 unpatented  mining claims in 
Mineral County, Nevada, and one mineral prospecting licence in Mono County, California. 

ii)  Spring Peak Property  

In May 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement with Kinetic Gold (US) Inc. (“Kinetic”) for the right 
to acquire a 100% interest in the Spring Peak gold property which consists of 37 United States federal mineral claims 
located in Mineral County, Nevada. The option can be exercised by making a cash payment to Kinetic of $19,472 
(US$15,000) on signing (paid) and further expenditures by the Company as follows: 

a)  cash payments to Kinetic totaling US$415,000 over the first five years following the issuance of a drill permit 
for the property, and then US$250,000 in each subsequent year until the option is exercised or terminated; and 
b)  a  total  of  US$725,000  in  permitting  and  exploration  work  on  the  property,  over  three  years  following  the 

issuance of the drill permit. 

At any time while the option is in good standing, the Company may elect to deliver to Kinetic  a technical report, 
complying with NI 43-101 standards, which documents a minimum 500,000 ounce gold equivalent inferred resource 
on the property, and upon said delivery, the Company will have the right for one year thereafter to purchase from 
Kinetic an outright 100% interest in the property for the sum of US$500,000.  

If the Company completes the purchase of the Spring Peak property, a combined 3.0% net smelter returns royalty 
will be granted to Kinetic and the underlying property owner. Up to one-half of the royalty may be purchased for up 
to US$1.5 million. 

iii)  ABC Property  

In  2016,  the  Company  staked  122  contiguous  United  States  federal  mining  claims  (covering  approximately  992 
hectares) in Mineral County, Nevada. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company wrote off acquisition 
costs of $69,187 relating to the ABC Property as the Company allowed the claims to lapse. 

23 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

10.  MINERAL INTERESTS AND ROYALTIES – (cont’d) 

USA – (cont’d) 

iv)  Coyote Property  

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company was granted a lease and option agreement with Geologic Services 
Inc.  (“Geologic”)  on  the  Coyote  gold  property  which  consists  of  58  unpatented  mineral  claims  located  in  Elko 
County, Nevada.  

Geologic granted the Company an exclusive lease of a 100% interest in the property for a period of up to 15 years, 
in  consideration  for  the  granting  to  Geologic  of  a  2.0%  to  3.0%  NSR  royalty,  the  percentage  to  depend  on  the 
prevailing price of gold. In order to keep the lease in good standing, the Company is to make annual advance royalty 
payments to Geologic, beginning with a payment of US$25,000 that was made upon the execution of the agreement.  

At any time during the term of the lease, the Company may elect to acquire a 100% interest in the Coyote property 
by making a cash payment of US$2.0 million to Geologic.  

Mexico 

i)  Amalia Project 

In June 2017, the Company signed a binding agreement with a private individual to option the (380-hectare) Amalia 
Project in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico. The Company can earn a 100% interest in the Amalia Project by making 
an initial cash payment of US$5,000 (paid) and by completing staged payments over a period of five years totaling 
US$845,000 cash and, subject to stock exchange approval, US$15,000 in shares of the Company. 

Following the signing of the option agreement, the Company staked an additional 10,000 hectares surrounding the 
Amalia Project. A total of $13,348 in acquisition costs have been recorded for this property during the year ended 
December 31, 2017. 

ii)  Tarros Project 

In September 2017, the Company signed a binding agreement with a private Mexican company to option the (473-
hectare) Tarros Project in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico. The Company could earn a 100% interest in the Tarros 
Project by making an initial cash payment of US$3,250 (paid) and by completing staged payments over a period of 
4.5 years totaling US$1,098,500. As at December 31, 2017, the carrying value of the Tarros Project was $Nil. The 
Company expensed the US$3,250 paid as the project is no longer recoverable.  

Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company terminated the option agreement prior to the due date of the next 
required cash option payment. 

iii)  Tlacolula Property 

The Tlacolula Property consists of one granted exploration concession.  

By an agreement signed in September 2009, as amended, the Company granted to Fortuna the option to earn a 60% 
interest  in  the  Tlacolula  Property  by  spending  US$2 million  on  exploration  of  the  Property  and  making  staged 
payments totaling US$300,000 cash and US$250,000 in common stock no later than January 31, 2017.  

Fortuna did not meet the January 31, 2017 deadline for making the required exploration expenditures. Accordingly, 
during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company and Fortuna amended the option so that Fortuna  could 
acquire a 100% interest in the Property, subject to a 2% royalty being retained by the Company. On July 31, 2017, 
the  sale  of  the  Tlacolula  Property  to  Fortuna  was  completed  with  a  cash  payment  of  $187,710  (US$150,000), 
granting of the 2% royalty, and issuance of 239,385 Fortuna shares with a fair value of $1,472,218. The Company 
incurred $1,000 in transaction costs. A gain of $1,658,928 was recorded for this transaction during the year ended 
December 31, 2017. 

The Company and Fortuna have two common directors.  

24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

10.  MINERAL INTERESTS AND ROYALTIES – (cont’d) 

Mexico – (cont’d) 

iii)  Lithium Brine Projects 

In 2016, the Company submitted applications for mineral concessions covering four lithium brine projects in the 
States of Chihuahua and Coahuila, Mexico at a cost of $23,748. 

In September 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement with Advantage, an unrelated party, whereby 
Advantage had an option to earn up to a 70% interest in the projects. The Company received $25,000 in cash upon 
signing of the option agreement and a further $50,000 in cash and 250,000 common shares of Advantage with a fair 
value of $225,000 upon stock exchange approval of the option agreement.  

During the year ended December 31, 2017, Advantage advised the Company that it had decided to focus its efforts 
in countries other than Mexico and therefore terminated the option agreement.  Also during  the current  year, the 
Company submitted an application for an additional 10,000 hectare mineral concession covering an adjacent lithium 
brine  project  in  the  State  of  Chihuahua,  but  subsequently  withdrew  this  and  allowed  the  three  other  lithium 
applications in Chihuahua to lapse. The Company currently retains one application in the State of Coahuila. As at 
December 31, 2017, the carrying value of the Lithium Brine Projects is $nil (2016: $nil). 

Guatemala 

i)  Tambor Project Royalty 

In August 2012, the Company sold its interest in its subsidiary, Exploraciones Mineras de Guatemala S.A., which 
holds the Tambor gold project, to KCA, giving KCA a 100% interest in the project. KCA agreed to make royalty 
payments to the Company, upon commercial production, based on the then price of gold and the number of ounces 
produced from the property.  

Commercial production commenced in December 2014. In May 2016, KCA informed the Company that mining 
operations were suspended by the Supreme Court of Guatemala due to a lack of consultation by the Guatemalan 
Ministry of Mines with local indigenous people when the mine was permitted in 2011. To date, the Supreme Court 
has not made a decision on when the mine may re-open. 

There was no royalty income recognized for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016: $431,643).    

As at December 31, 2017, all gold sales subject to the Company’s royalty had been final settled and the balance that 
remained unpaid to the Company was $748,180. Due to the uncertainty as to when the mine may re-open and when 
the amount owing by KCA to the Company will be paid, a provision of $748,180 against the receivable amount was 
charged to operations in 2016.  

ii)  Southeast Guatemala Ag-Au Epithermal Fields (formerly called Banderas) 

The  Company’s  100%  owned  land  holdings  in  southeast  Guatemala  as  at  December  31,  2017  consist  of  34 
concessions (one granted exploration licence, twenty-nine exploration applications, three exploitation applications, 
and one reconnaissance application) filed  with the Guatemala  Ministry of Energy and  Mines covering a total of 
228,264  hectares.  The  three  exploitation  applications  were  filed  in  order  to  convert  one  previously  granted 
exploration  licence  to  exploitation;  until  the  exploitation  licences  are  granted,  the  granted  exploration  licence 
remains in place. Due to the Company only performing care and maintenance activities on this property since 2013 
and the uncertainty regarding when or if exploration activities will resume, the property has a nominal carrying value 
of $1.  

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

10.  MINERAL INTERESTS AND ROYALTIES – (cont’d) 

Peru 

Bayovar 12 Project Royalty 
In April 2015, the Company purchased from CROPS a production royalty equivalent to 2% of CROPS’s 70% interest in 
future phosphate production from the Bayovar 12 project located in the Sechura district of northern Peru. The purchase 
price for the royalty was $1,259,505 (US$1,000,000). Should the Company decide at any time in the future to sell the 
royalty, CROPS will retain a first right of refusal. The Company and CROPS have two common directors.  

11.  COMMITMENTS 

The Company has entered into an operating lease agreement for its office premises. The Company also rents space to 
other companies related by common directors and officers on a month to month basis, the amounts of which are netted 
against rental expense; however, there are no commitments from these companies and thus the amounts presented below 
are the gross commitments. The annual commitments under the lease are as follows: 

2018 
2019 

 $            190,608 
190,608  
 $            381,216  

For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  the  Company  received  a  total  of  $160,663  (2016:  $147,441)  from  those 
companies which share office space with the Company. 

12.  SHARE CAPITAL AND RESERVES 

a)  Common Shares   

The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares without par value. 

There was no share capital activity during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. 

13. 

SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS  

a)  Option Plan Details 

The Company has a formal stock option plan in accordance with the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) 
under which it is authorized to grant options up to 10% of its outstanding shares to officers, directors, employees and 
consultants. The exercise price of each option is not less than the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the 
trading day prior to the date of grant. Options granted to investor relations personnel vest in accordance with TSX-V 
regulation. The options are for a maximum term of ten years. 

The following is a summary of changes in options for the year ended December 31, 2017: 

Grant date 

Expiry date 

Exercise 
price 

Opening 
balance 

Granted 

Exercised 

Forfeited / 
expired 

Closing 
balance 

Vested and 
exercisable 

During the year 

Jan 08, 2010 

Jan 07, 2020 

$0.29  

     1,245,000  

May 26, 2010  May 25, 2020 

$0.36  

        100,000  

Sep 24, 2010 

Sep 23, 2020 

$0.69  

        100,000  

Dec 13, 2012 

Dec 12, 2022 

$0.20  

    1,885,000  

Oct 19, 2016 

Oct 18, 2026 

$0.15  

    1,740,000  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

                  -  

                  -  

                  -  

                  -  

                  -  

Weighted average exercise price 

$0.22  

- 

-  

    5,070,000  

-   

                  -  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

- 

- 

     1,245,000  

     1,245,000  

        100,000  

        100,000  

        100,000  

        100,000  

    1,885,000  

    1,885,000  

    1,740,000  

    1,740,000  

    5,070,000  

    5,070,000  

$0.22  

$0.22 

26 

 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

13.  SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS – (cont’d) 

a)  Option Plan Details – (cont’d) 

The following is a summary of changes in options for the year ended December 31, 2016: 

During the year 

Grant date 

Expiry date 

Exercise 
price 

Opening 
balance 

Granted 

Exercised 

Forfeited / 
expired 

Closing 
balance 

Vested and 
exercisable 

Jan 08, 2010 

Jan 07, 2020 

$0.29  

     1,570,000  

May 26, 2010  May 25, 2020 

$0.36  

        100,000  

Sep 24, 2010 

Sep 23, 2020 

$0.69  

        820,000  

Jul 27, 2011 

Jul 26, 2021 

$0.81  

        150,000  

Dec 13, 2012 

Dec 12, 2022 

$0.20  

    2,135,000  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

                  -  

(325,000)  

     1,245,000  

     1,245,000  

                  -  

-  

        100,000  

        100,000  

                  -  

(720,000)  

        100,000  

        100,000  

                  -  

(150,000)  

        -  

        -  

                  -  

(250,000)  

    1,885,000  

    1,885,000  

Oct 19, 2016 

Oct 18, 2026 

$0.15  

    -  

1,740,000  

                  -  

-  

    1,740,000  

    1,740,000  

    4,775,000  

1,740,000   

                  -  

(1,445,000) 

    5,070,000  

    5,070,000  

Weighted average exercise price 

$0.34  

$0.15 

-  

$0.53 

$0.22  

$0.22 

b)  Fair Value of Options Granted During the Year 

There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2017. 

The weighted average fair value at grant date of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $0.12 
per option. 

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options outstanding at December 31, 2017 is 5.46 years (2016: 
6.46 years). 

Options Issued to Employees 

The fair value at grant date is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise 
price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the 
underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option. 

Options Issued to Non-Employees 

Options issued to non-employees are measured based on the fair value of the goods or services received, at the date of 
receiving those goods or services. If the fair value of the goods or services received cannot be estimated reliably, the 
options are measured by determining the fair value of the options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. 

The model inputs for options granted during the year ended December 31, 2016 included: 

Grant date 

Expiry date 

Share price 
at grant 
date  

Exercise 
price 

Risk-free 
interest 
rate 

Expected 
life 

Volatility 
factor 

Dividend 
yield 

Oct 19, 2016 

Oct 18, 2026 

$0.145  

$0.15  

1.29%  

10 years  

88%  

0%  

The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility (based on the remaining life of the options), adjusted for any 
expected changes to future volatility due to publicly available information. The risk-free rate of return is the yield on a 
zero-coupon Canadian Treasury Bill of a term consistent with the assumed option life. The expected average option term 
is the average expected period to exercise, based on the historical activity patterns for each individually vesting tranche. 

27 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

13.  SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS – (cont’d) 

Option  pricing  models  require  the  input  of  highly  subjective  assumptions,  including  the  expected  price  volatility. 
Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and, therefore, the existing models do not 
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options. 

c)  Expenses Arising from Share-based Payment Transactions 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no expenses arising from the share-based payment transactions 
recognized as part of share-based compensation expense (2016: $213,150). 

14.  INCOME TAXES 

Taxation  in  the  Company  and  its  subsidiaries’  operational  jurisdictions  is  calculated  at  the  rates  prevailing  in  the 
respective jurisdictions. 

The difference between tax expense for the year and the expected income taxes based on the statutory tax rate arises as 
follows: 

Income before income taxes 

Tax charge based on the statutory rate of 26% 
Non-deductible expenses 
Different tax rates in other jurisdictions 
Non-taxable portion of capital gains 
Initial recognition exemption and other 
Effect of change in tax rates 
Under provided in prior years 
Changes in unrecognized deferred tax assets   

Total income tax expense / (recovery)  

December 31, 2017 

December 31, 2016 

$          194,003 

$          1,862,266 

$            50,000 
13,000 
64,000 
(211,000) 
(58,000) 
(132,000) 
(124,000) 
398,000 

$            484,000 
77,000 
194,000 
(328,000) 
(76,000) 
- 
- 
(351,000) 

$                      - 

$                        - 

The tax rates represent the federal statutory rate applicable for the 2017 taxation year, 0% for Cayman Islands, 30.0% 
for Mexico, 25.0% for Guatemala and 30.0% for Nicaragua. 

No deferred tax asset has been recognized in respect of the following losses and temporary differences as it is not 
considered probable that sufficient future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered: 

Loss carry forwards 
Property and equipment 
Mineral properties 
Available-for-sale investments 
Investment in Associates 
Other deductible temporary differences 
Unrecognized tax assets 

December 31, 2017 

December 31, 2016 

$        1,949,000 
71,000 
520,000 
10,000 
110,000 
412,000 
(3,072,000) 

$        2,005,000 
89,000 
460,000 
(4,000) 
69,000 
53,000 
(2,672,000) 

$                       - 

$                      - 

As at December 31, 2017, the Company has estimated non-capital losses of $7,218,000 (2016: $6,036,000) for Canadian 
income tax purposes that may be carried forward to reduce taxable income derived in future years. Non-capital Canadian 
tax losses expire in various amounts from 2027 to 2037. 

28 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

15.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

The Company had transactions during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 with related parties who consisted 
of directors, officers and the following companies with common directors: 

 Related Party 
Mill Street Services Ltd. (“Mill Street”) 
Gold Group Management Inc. (“Gold Group”) 
Fortuna  
CROPS  
Medgold  
Volcanic  
Rackla (Associate) 

Nature of Transactions 
Management fees 
Shared general and administrative expenses 
Shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment 

In  addition  to  related  party  transactions  disclosed  elsewhere  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  the  Company 
incurred  the  following  expenditures  charged  by  non-key  management  officers  and  companies  which  have  common 
directors with the Company in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: 

General and administrative expenses: 

Salaries and benefits 
Exploration expenditures: 

Geological fees 
Salaries and benefits 

2017 

2016 

 $             21,200  

 $             36,827  

57,688 
7,087  

18,542 
4,326  

 $             85,975  

 $             59,695  

The Company reimburses Gold Group, a company controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for shared 
administrative costs and other business related expenses paid by Gold Group on behalf of the Company. During the years 
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company reimbursed Gold Group the following:  

General and administrative expenses: 

Office and miscellaneous 
Shareholder communications 
Salaries and benefits 
Transfer agent and regulatory fees 
Travel and accommodation 

2017 

2016 

 $              43,434   
1,594  
103,967  
3,983  
11,900  

 $               41,263   
1,289  
118,658  
3,378  
9,327  

 $            164,878  

 $              173,915  

Exploration expenditures 

 $                        -  

 $                  2,930  

Gold  Group  salary  and  benefits  costs  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017  and  2016  include  those  for  the  Chief 
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. 

29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

15.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS – (cont’d) 

Prepaid expenses and deposits include an amount of $1,142 (2016: $5,797) paid to Gold Group for shared office and 
administrative services. 

Long-term deposits include an amount of $60,000 (2016: $60,000) paid to Gold Group as a deposit on the shared office 
and administrative services agreement. 

Due from related parties consist of $Nil (2016: $13,693) due from Medgold, a company which has a common director 
with the Company, arising from shared administrative costs and $Nil (2016: $3,107) due from CROPS, a company which 
has two common directors with the Company, arising from shared administrative costs. These amounts were unsecured, 
non-interest bearing and due on demand. 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities include $44,471 (2016: $2,828) payable to Gold Group for shared administrative 
costs and $2,594 (2016: $4,033) to a Director of the Company for geological fees. 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the following transactions also occurred: 

i)  The Company acquired 606,250 common shares of CROPS on the open market for a cost of $92,346 (Note 6). 

ii)  The Company acquired 685,675 common shares of CROPS by way of private placement at a cost of $137,135 (Note 

6). 

iii)  The Company received net cash of $186,710 and 239,385 common shares of Fortuna with a fair value of $1,472,218 

as proceeds on the sale of a mineral property to Fortuna (Note 6). 

iv)  The Company acquired 1,959,000 common shares of Volcanic by way of private placements for a cost of $575,100 
and received 1,263,883 common shares with a fair value  of $606,664 pursuant to a mineral property assignment 
agreement (Note 6). 

v)  The Company acquired 1,000,000 common shares of Rackla upon the exercise of 1,000,000 share purchase warrants 

at a cost of $50,000 (Note 9). 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the follow transactions also occurred: 

i)  The Company acquired 562,500 common shares of CROPS of which 192,500 shares were acquired by way of a 
private  placement  for  a  cost  of  $50,050,  another  192,500  shares  acquired  upon  the  exercise  of  share  purchase 
warrants at a cost of $57,750, and 177,500 shares acquired on the open market for a cost of $65,159 (Note 6). 

ii)  The  Company  acquired  2,000,000  common  shares  of  Medgold  upon  the  exercise  of  2,000,000  share  purchase 

warrants at a cost of $300,000 (Note 6). 

Key management compensation 

Key management personnel are persons responsible for planning, directing and controlling the activities of an entity, 
and include certain directors and officers. Key management compensation comprises: 

Management fees 
Geological fees included in exploration expenditures 
Salaries, benefits and fees* 
Share-based payments 

2017 

2016 

 $             42,000  
60,000 
33,321  
- 

 $             42,000  
60,000 
34,833  
49,000 

 $           135,321  

 $           185,833  

      *Included in reimbursements to Gold Group 

Total share-based payments to directors not included in the above table during the year ended December 31, 2017 was 
$Nil (2016: $55,125). 

30 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

16.  SEGMENTED INFORMATION 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available 
that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate 
resources and in assessing performance. All of the Company’s operations are within the mining sector relating to mineral 
exploration except for a royalty interest in a gold producing property. Due to the geographic and political diversity, the 
Company’s exploration operations are decentralized whereby exploration managers are responsible for business results 
and regional corporate offices provide support to the exploration programs in addressing local and regional issues. The 
Company’s operations are therefore segmented on a district basis. The Company’s assets were located in Canada, USA, 
Guatemala, Peru, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Cayman Islands. Details of identifiable assets by geographic segments are as 
follows: 

Year ended December 31, 2017 

Canada 

USA 

Guatemala 

Mexico 

Other  Consolidated 

Exploration expenditures 

 $                 -  

 $     492,991   

 $       50,834   

 $   510,010 

 $     86,597   

 $    1,140,432   

Mineral property acquisition costs written off 

- 

69,187 

Gain on property assignment 

Gain on sale of available-for-sale investments 

Investment income 

Amortization 

Net income (loss) 

Capital expenditures* 

606,664 

204,346  

10,673  

15,585  

- 

-  

-  

-  

- 

- 

-  

-  

-  

- 

- 

-  

-  

4,173 

- 

- 

-  

-  

-  

(205,037)  

(664,377)  

 (49,721) 

 1,169,675 

 (56,537) 

-  

117,816  

-  

50,805  

-  

69,187 

606,664 

204,346  

10,673  

19,758  

194,003  

168,621  

Year ended December 31, 2016 

Canada 

USA 

Guatemala 

Mexico 

Other  Consolidated 

Royalty income 

Exploration expenditures 
Gain on sale of available-for-sale 
   investments 

Investment income 

Amortization 

Net income (loss) 

Capital expenditures* 

 $                 -  

$                -  

$     431,643    $                  -  

$                -  

$       431,643  

                -  

   194,460  

69,525  

      140,205  

     140,396   

      544,586  

2,688,336 

13,068  

18,674  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

6,138  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

-  

 2,688,336 

13,068  

24,812  

2,679,715 

 (194,460) 

(362,724) 

 (44,315) 

(215,950)  

 1,862,266 

-  

88,659  

-  

23,748  

-  

112,407  

*Capital expenditures consist of additions of property and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets. 

As at December 31, 2017 

Canada 

USA 

Guatemala 

Peru 

Mexico 

Other  Consolidated 

Total current assets 

$   8,343,930  

 $           -  

 $     10,874  

 $             -  

 $     194,521  

 $       34,750  

 $    8,584,075  

Total non-current assets 

160,869  

137,288  

- 

1,259,505  

46,632  

-  

1,604,294  

Total assets 

$   8,504,799 

 $     137,288  

 $     10,874  

 $  1,259,505  

 $     241,153  

 $       34,750  

 $  10,188,369  

Total liabilities 

 $       175,116  

 $                 - 

 $           896  

 $                 -  

 $       30,867  

 $                 -  

 $       199,278  

As at December 31, 2016 

Canada 

USA 

Guatemala 

Peru 

Mexico 

Other  Consolidated 

Total current assets 

$   8,211,529  

 $                 -  

 $     10,945  

 $                 -  

 $       32,161  

 $       69,610  

 $    8,324,245  

Total non-current assets 

176,454  

88,659  

- 

1,259,505  

-  

-  

1,524,618  

Total assets 

$   8,387,983 

 $       88,659  

 $     10,945  

 $  1,259,505  

 $       32,161  

 $       69,610  

 $    9,848,863  

Total liabilities 

 $        94,130  

 $                 - 

 $         1,609  

 $                 -  

 $         4,439  

 $         7,706  

 $       107,884  

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

17.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT 

The Company is exposed to the following financial risks: 

•  Market Risk 
•  Credit Risk 
•  Liquidity Risk 

In common with all other businesses, the Company is exposed to risks that arise from its use of financial instruments. 
This note describes the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks and the methods used to 
measure  them.  Further  quantitative  information  in  respect  of  these  risks  is  presented  throughout  these  consolidated 
financial statements. 

General Objectives, Policies and Processes 

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the determination of the Company’s risk management objectives 
and  policies  and,  whilst  retaining  ultimate  responsibility  for  them,  it  has  delegated  the  authority  for  designing  and 
operating processes that ensure the effective implementation of the objectives and policies to  the Company’s finance 
function. The Board of Directors receive periodic reports through which it reviews the effectiveness of the processes put 
in place and the appropriateness of the objectives and policies it sets. 

The overall objective of the Board is to set policies that seek to reduce risk as far as possible without unduly affecting 
the Company’s competitiveness and flexibility. Further details regarding these policies are set out below. 

a)  Market Risk 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes 
in market prices. Market prices are comprised of three types of risk: foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, and equity 
price risk. 

Foreign Currency Risk 

Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because 
of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies through its operations 
in foreign countries. The Company monitors this exposure, but has no hedge positions. As at December 31, 2017 and 
2016,  the  Company  is  exposed  to  currency  risk  through  the  following  financial  assets  and  liabilities  denominated  in 
currencies other than the Canadian dollar: 

December 31, 2017 

December 31, 2016 

 US Dollar  

 Mexican 
Peso  

Guatemala 
Quetzal  

 Nicaragua 
Cordoba  

 US Dollar  

 Mexican 
Peso  

Guatemala 
Quetzal  

 Nicaragua 
Cordoba  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 (CDN 
equivalent)  

Cash 
Receivables 
Current liabilities 

 $   172,803  
-  
 (74,910) 

 $      3,969  
59,386  
 (28,409) 

 $              -  
2,899 
 (896) 

 $         574  
-  
 - 

 $     20,012  
-  
 (11,507) 

 $         930  
27,047  
 (4,439) 

 $           24  
2,872 
 (1,609) 

 $          525  
-  
 (7,706) 

 $     97,893  

 $    34,946  

 $       2,003  

 $         574 

 $       8,505  

 $    23,538  

 $       1,287  

 $    (7,181) 

Based on the above net exposures at December 31, 2017, a 10% depreciation or appreciation of the above currencies 
against the Canadian dollar would result in approximately a $13,500 (2016: $2,600) increase or decrease in profit or loss, 
respectively. 

32 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

17.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT – (cont’d) 

a)  Market Risk – (cont’d) 

Commodity Price Risk 

The Company’s royalty revenue is derived from a royalty interest that is based on the extraction and sale of gold. Factors 
beyond  the  control  of  the  Company  may  affect  the  marketability  of  gold  discovered.  Gold  prices  have  historically 
fluctuated widely. Consequently, the economic viability of the Company’s royalty interest cannot be accurately predicted 
and may be adversely affected by fluctuations in gold prices. The Company has not engaged in any hedging activities. 

Interest Rate Risk 

Interest  rate  risk  is  the  risk  that  future  cash  flows  will  fluctuate  as  a  result  of  changes  in  market  interest  rates.  The 
Company does not have any borrowings. Interest rate risk is limited to potential decreases on the interest rate offered on 
cash held with chartered Canadian financial institutions. The Company considers this risk to be  limited as it holds no 
assets or liabilities subject to variable rates of interest. 

Equity Price Risk 

Equity price risk is the uncertainty associated with the valuation of assets arising from changes in equity markets. The 
Company’s available-for-sale investments consisting of common shares and derivative investments consisting of share 
purchase warrants are exposed to significant equity price risk due to the potentially volatile and speculative nature of the 
businesses in which the investments are held. The available-for-sale investments held in Advantage, CROPS, Fortuna, 
GrowMax, Medgold, Southern Silver, ValGold, Volcanic, and War Eagle and the warrants held in CROPS, Volcanic, 
ValGold and War Eagle are monitored by the Board with decisions on sale taken by Management. A 10% decrease in 
fair value of the shares and warrants would result in an approximate $514,000 decrease in comprehensive income and 
shareholders’ equity.  

b)  Credit Risk 

Credit  risk  is  the  risk  of  an  unexpected  loss  if  a  customer  or  third  party  to  a  financial  instrument  fails  to  meet  its 
contractual obligations. The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to its cash and cash equivalents, available-
for-sale investments, derivative investments and receivables. The Company limits exposure to credit risk by maintaining 
its cash and cash equivalents with large financial institutions. The Company does not have cash and cash equivalents or 
available-for-sale investments that are invested in asset based commercial paper. For advances and other receivables, the 
Company estimates, on a continuing basis, the probable losses and provides a provision for losses based on the estimated 
realizable value.  

c)  Liquidity Risk 

Liquidity  risk  is  the  risk  that  the  Company  will  not  be  able  to  meet  its  financial  obligations  as  they  fall  due.  The 
Company’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to provide reasonable assurance that it will have sufficient funds to 
meet liabilities when due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows required by operations and 
anticipated investing and financing activities. At December 31, 2017, the Company had working capital of $8.38 million 
(2016:  $8.22  million)  available  to  apply  against  short-term  business  requirements.  All  of  the  Company’s  financial 
liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 45 days and are subject to normal trade terms. 

Determination of Fair value 

Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When 
applicable, further information about the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific 
to that asset or liability. 

Management considers that due to their short-term nature the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities, 
which include cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale investments, receivables, receivable derivatives, derivative 
instruments, amounts due from related parties, deposits, and accounts payables and accrued liabilities are assumed to 
approximate their fair values. 

33 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

17.  FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK MANAGEMENT – (cont’d) 

The fair value investments in associates are detailed in the following table:    

Financial assets 

Shares held in Rackla (Note 9) 

Fair Value Hierarchy 

December 31, 
2017 
Book value 

December 31, 
2017 
Fair value 

 $                   1 

 $        456,927  

Financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value are grouped in Levels 1 to 3 based 
on the degree to which the fair value is observable: 

Level 1 

Level 2 

Level 3 

 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; 
 Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or 
liability, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and 
 Inputs  for  the  asset  or  liability  that  are  not  based  on  observable  market  data 
(unobservable inputs). 

The available-for-sale investments for CROPS, Fortuna, Southern Silver, Medgold, Advantage, GrowMax, ValGold, and 
Volcanic are based on quoted prices and are therefore considered to be Level 1. The available-for-sale investment for 
War Eagle as of December 31, 2017 and derivative instruments are based on inputs other than quoted prices and therefore 
considered to be Level 3. As of December 31, 2017, there was no embedded derivative on royalty income receivables 
derived from gold prices to include as a Level 2 measurement and therefore no fair value measurement was necessary.  

18.  CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 

The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern 
in order to advance its mineral properties. In order to facilitate the management of its capital requirements, the Company 
prepares  periodic  budgets  that  are  updated  as  necessary.  The  Company  manages  its  capital  structure  and  makes 
adjustments to it to effectively support the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. The properties in which the 
Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage; as such the Company is dependent on external financing 
to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and pay for general administrative costs, the Company 
will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed. The Company will continue to assess new 
properties  and  seek  to  acquire  an  interest  in  additional  properties  if  it  feels  there  is  sufficient  geologic  or  economic 
potential and if it has adequate financial resources to do so. 

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the 
relative size of the Company, is reasonable. The Company monitors its cash, available-for-sale investments, common 
shares, warrants and stock options as capital. There were no changes in the Company’s approach to capital management 
during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company’s investment policy is to hold cash in interest bearing bank 
accounts and highly liquid short-term interest-bearing investments with maturities of one year or less and which can be 
liquidated at any time without penalties. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to externally imposed 
capital requirements and does not have exposure to asset-backed commercial paper or similar products. The Company 
expects its current capital resources to be sufficient to carry out its planned exploration programs and operating costs for 
the next twelve months.  

34 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Radius Gold Inc. 
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
For the year ended December 31, 2017  
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars) 

19.  SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION 

Shares acquired due to a mineral property assignment agreement 
Shares acquired from a sale of a mineral property  
Shares acquired from a mineral property option agreement 

2017 

2016 

 $        606,664  
 $     1,472,218  

 $                    -        
 $                    -        

 $                    -  

 $        225,000        

There were no financing activities during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. 

35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
(the “Company”) 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Year End Report – December 31, 2017 

General  

This  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  (“MD&A”)  supplements,  but  does  not  form  part  of,  the  annual 
audited  consolidated  financial  statements  of  the  Company  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2017.    The 
following information, prepared as of April 26, 2018, should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2017 
consolidated  financial  statements.    The  Company  reports  its  financial  position,  results  of  operations  and  cash 
flows  in  accordance  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  (“IFRS”)  as  issued  by  the  International 
Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated. 

The  Company’s  public  filings,  including  its  most  recent  unaudited  and  audited  financial  statements  can  be 
reviewed on the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com).  

Forward Looking Information 

This  MD&A  contains  certain  statements  which  constitute  forward-looking  information  within  the  meaning  of 
applicable Canadian securities legislation (“Forward-looking Statements”).  All statements included herein, other 
than  statements  of  historical  fact,  are  Forward-looking  Statements  and  are  subject  to  a  variety  of  known  and 
unknown  risks  and  uncertainties  which  could  cause  actual  events  or  results  to  differ  materially  from  those 
reflected in the Forward-looking Statements.  The Forward-looking Statements in this MD&A include, without 
limitation, statements relating to: 

the Company’s planned exploration activities for its mineral properties; 

• 
•  The Company’s available-for-sale and equity investments; 
• 
• 
• 

the suspension of receiving royalty payments from the Tambor Project; 
the intended use of proceeds received from past and possible future financing activities; 
the sufficiency of the Company’s cash position and its ability to raise, if needed, equity capital or access 
debt facilities; and 

•  maturities of the Company’s financial liabilities or other contractual commitments. 

Often,  but  not  always,  these  Forward-looking  Statements  can  be  identified  by  the  use  of  words  such  as 
“anticipates”,  “believes”,  “plans”,  “estimates”,  “expects”,  “forecasts”,  “scheduled”,  “targets”,  “possible”, 
“strategy”, “potential”, “intends”, “advance”, “goal”, “objective”, “projects”, “budget”, “calculates” or statements 
that events, “will”, “may”, “could” or “should” occur or be achieved and similar expressions, including negative 
variations. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 2 - 

Forward-looking Statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause 
the  actual  results,  performance  or  achievements  of  the  Company  to  be  materially  different  from  any  results, 
performance  or  achievements  expressed  or  implied  by  the  Forward-looking  Statements.  Such  uncertainties  and 
factors include, among others:   

• 

risks  associated  with  mineral  exploration  activities,  and  investing  in  companies  which  conduct  mineral 
exploration and development activities;  

•  due diligence investigations on potential investments not identifying all relevant facts; 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

inability to dispose of illiquid securities; 
receipt of royalty payments from the Tambor Project; 
fluctuations in commodity prices;  
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates;  
credit and liquidity risks; 
changes  in  national  and  local  government  legislation,  taxation,  controls,  regulations  and  political  or 
economic developments in countries in which the Company does or may carry on business;  
reliance on key personnel;  

• 
•  property title matters and local community relationships; 
• 
risks associated with potential legal claims generally or with respect to environmental matters;  
• 
adequacy of insurance coverage; 
•  dilution from further equity financing;  
• 
•  uncertainties relating to general economic conditions.  

competition; and 

as well as those factors referred to in the “Risks and Uncertainties” section in this MD&A.   

Forward-looking  Statements  contained  in  this  MD&A  are  based  on  the  assumptions,  beliefs,  expectations  and 
opinions of management, including but not limited to: 

• 

• 

all  required  third  party  contractual,  regulatory  and  governmental  approvals  will  be  obtained  for  the 
exploration and development of the Company’s properties;  
there being no significant disruptions affecting operations, whether relating to labor, supply, power, damage 
to equipment or other matter;  

•  permitting, exploration and/or development activities proceeding on a basis consistent with the Company’s 

current expectations;  
ability to sell our available-for-sale and equity investments as needed; 
royalty payments from the Tambor Project to begin being received again; 

• 
• 
•  due diligence investigations on potential investments will reveal all relevant facts; 
• 
expected trends and specific assumptions regarding commodity prices and currency exchange rates; and 
•  prices for and availability of fuel, electricity, equipment and other key supplies remaining consistent with 

current levels. 

These Forward-looking Statements are made as of the date hereof and the Company disclaims any obligation to 
update  any  Forward-looking  Statements,  whether  as  a  result  of  new  information,  future  events  or  results  or 
otherwise, except as required by law.  There can be no assurance that Forward-looking Statements will prove to 
be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.  
Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on Forward-looking Statements. 

 
 
 
 
Business of the Company 

- 3 - 

The Company has been exploring for gold in the Americas for over a decade which has resulted in the discovery 
of several gold deposits in Central America.  Management has been conducting an ongoing review of exploration 
projects and/or distressed junior companies that may be available for acquisition or joint venture with the aim of 
expanding the geographic and commodity focus of the Company.  

Since commencement of commercial production at the Tambor Project, Guatemala in December 2014 and until 
suspension of operations in May 2016, the Company has received royalty payments from the project owner.  To 
date,  the  Company  has  recognized  net  royalty  income  of  $1,530,555,  of  which  $746,375  has  been  received  to 
date.  For further details on this royalty, see “Royalty Interests – Guatemala-Tambor Project Royalty” below. 

In April 2015 the Company completed a change of business from a Tier 2 Mining Issuer to a Tier 1 Investment 
Issuer in accordance with the rules and policies of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”).  The Company remains 
involved only in the resource sector and has not sought to become solely a royalty company or investment fund.  
The  change  of  business  has  simply  given  the  Company  more  flexibility  to  apply  its  working  capital  to  a wider 
range of projects within the resource sector. 

A summary of the Company’s investments, royalties and properties is provided below:   

Investments 

On  April  23,  2018,  one  of  the  Company’s  investments,  Focus Ventures  Ltd., changed  its name  to  CROPS  Inc. 
(“CROPS”) and completed a share consolidation so that every four existing common shares were exchanged for 
one new common share of CROPS. 

The following is a summary of investment activities from January 1, 2017 and until the date of this MD&A: 

•  685,675 common shares and 685,675 warrants of CROPS were purchased by way of a private placement 

at a cost of $137,135.  

•  606,250 common shares of CROPS were purchased on the open market at a cost of $92,346. 
•  700,000 common shares of GrowMax Resources Corp. (“GrowMax”) were purchased on the open market 

at a cost of $81,649. 

•  239,385 shares of Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (“Fortuna”) were received with a fair market value at time of 
issuance of $1,472,218 as part consideration for the sale of the Company’s Tlacolula Property, Mexico. 
•  1,263,883 common shares of Volcanic Gold Mines Inc. (“Volcanic”) were received with a fair value of 

$606,664 at the time of issuance, pursuant to a mineral property assignment agreement. 

•  1,959,000  common  shares  and  1,542,000  warrants  of  Volcanic  were  acquired  by  way  of  private 

placements at a cost of $575,100. 

•  240,000 common shares of Southern Silver Exploration Corp. (“Southern Silver”) were sold on the open 

market for net proceeds of $80,675. 

•  1,000,000 common shares of Rackla Metals Inc. (“Rackla”) were acquired by way of a warrant exercise 

at a cost of $50,000. 

•  1,000,000 common shares and 1,000,000 warrants of ValGold Resources Ltd. (“ValGold”) were acquired 

by way of a private placement at a cost of $65,000. 

•  250,000 common shares of Advantage Lithium Corp. (“Advantage”) were sold on the open market for net 

proceeds of $262,808. 

•  86,500 common shares of Medgold Resources Corp. (“Medgold”) were purchased on the open market at 

a cost of $18,064. 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
- 4 - 

•  625,000  common  shares  and  312,500  warrants  of  Champagne  Resources  Limited  (“Champagne”)  were 
exchanged  for  233,785  common  shares  and  116,890  warrants  of  War  Eagle  Mining  Company  Limited 
(“War Eagle”), a public company which amalgamated with Champagne. 

The  Company’s  current  cash  and  cash  equivalents  on  hand  is  approximately  $2.8  million  and  its  current 
investments consist of: 

CROPS  
2,564,027 shares 
Current market value:  $205,000 

CROPS is a Canadian-listed exploration company 
developing the Bayovar 12 sedimentary phosphate 
resource in northern Peru. 

Plus: warrants to purchase an additional 1,143,425 
shares 

Fortuna   
239,385 shares 
Current market value:  $1,779,000 

GrowMax  
1,200,000 shares 
Current market value:  $120,000 

Fortuna is a growth oriented, precious metal producer 
with its primary assets being the Caylloma silver 
mine in southern Peru, the San Jose silver-gold mine 
in Mexico and the Lindero gold project in Argentina.   

GrowMax is a TSXV listed company focused on 
exploration and development of phosphate and 
potassium-rich brine resources on its Bayovar 
concessions in northwestern Peru. 

Medgold  
10,126,500 shares (10+% of issued) 
Current market value:  $1,924,000  

Medgold is a European-focused TSXV listed gold 
exploration and development company, focussing on 
the orogenic gold provinces of northwest Iberia and 
the under-explored provinces of southern Europe. 

Rackla  
3,973,275 shares (10+% of issued) 
Current market value:  $377,000  

Rackla is a mineral exploration company actively 
looking for new projects in the Americas to add to its 
portfolio of mineral claims in the Yukon Territory.  

Southern Silver  
1,259,500 shares 
Current market value:  $353,000 

Southern Silver is engaged in the acquisition, 
exploration and development of high-grade precious / 
base metals properties within North America, and is 
continuing to advance its flagship Cerro Las Minitas 
silver-lead-zinc property in Mexico. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 5 - 

ValGold  
1,000,000 shares 
Current market value:  $80,000 

Plus: warrants to purchase an additional 1,000,000 
shares 

ValGold is a mineral exploration and development 
company based in Ontario which holds a 2% NSR on 
the Garrison Gold Project on the “Golden Highway” 
east of Timmins, Ontario, a 100% interest in the 
Tower Mountain gold project near Thunder Bay, 
Ontario, and exploration projects in Venezuela. 

Volcanic  
3,222,883 shares 
Current market value:  $677,000 

Volcanic is a TSXV listed company focused on 
consolidating an under-explored gold district in West 
Africa. 

Plus: warrants to purchase an additional 1,542,000 
shares 

War Eagle 
233,785 shares 
Current market value:  $34,000  

Plus:  warrants  to  purchase  an  additional  116,890 
shares 

War Eagle is a TSXV listed company engaged in the 
exploration of mineral resource properties in northern 
Ontario with a focus on gold deposits.  It has a 
significant land position in the world class Kirkland 
Lake Gold Camp five kilometres from the Town of 
Kirkland Lake and adjacent to Kirkland Lake Gold 
Inc.’s high grade producing gold mine. 

Property Interests 

USA – Nevada – Bald Peak Property 

In March 2017, the Company added to the Company’s portfolio of epithermal gold prospects in the Aurora gold 
camp, Nevada with the acquisition of the Bald Peak gold property from Ely Gold & Minerals Inc. (TSX-V: ELY) 
and  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary,  Nevada  Select  Royalty  Inc.    Subsequently,  the  Company  increased  its  land 
position by staking an additional 113 unpatented mining claims which are contiguous to the claims acquired from 
Ely Gold.   

The Bald Peak Property currently consists of 151 unpatented mining claims in Mineral County, Nevada, and one 
mineral prospecting licence in Mono County, California.  The Property now covers an 8 kilometre by 2 kilometre 
area trends northeast from inside the California border into Nevada, parallel to the trend of the neighboring Bodie, 
Aurora, and Borealis mining camps.  

Bald Peak is an un-eroded epithermal gold prospect in the Aurora-Bodie mining district.  Sinter terraces outcrop 
along the length of the Property, evidence that the epithermal system has not been eroded beyond its paleo-surface 
elevation, and is thus likely fully preserved.  Despite the Property’s proximity to several Au-rich mining districts, 
the area has seen limited exploration activity.  Several operators have acquired the Property over the last 30 years 
and mapped alteration zones and various other criteria pertinent to epithermal gold discoveries.  The area has seen 
very limited drilling however, and its potential remains untested. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 6 - 

Work  by  the  Company  at  Bald  Peak  in  2017  consisted  of  geological  mapping  and  prospecting,  rock  and  soil 
geochemistry, and compilation work of historical exploration and academic and government datasets.  The work 
has  demonstrated  the  presence  of  a  strong  gold-bearing  epithermal  alteration  system  that  can  be  traced  along 
strike  for  over  six  kilometres  in  a  northeast  trend,  with  an  anomalous  zone  of  up  to  several  hundred  metres  in 
width on surface.  Within this global target area are several high priority drill targets.  They are described below, 
in  order  from  SW  to  NE,  and  maps  showing  the  property  and  the  targets  have  been  placed  on  the  Company’s 
website. 

West Bald Peak 

West Bald Peak is a high-level epithermal drill target located in Mono County, California, at the southwestern end 
of  the  property.    West  Bald  Peak  exhibits  a  high  Au,  As,  Sb,  Hg  response  in  both  rocks  and  soils  and  a  ~2-3 
metres thick approximately flat lying silica sinter terrace observed over 250 metres.  The sinter terrace is bound to 
the  southeast  by  an  approximately  30  metres  wide  northeast  trending,  steeply  west  dipping  gold-bearing  fault 
zone  that  is  observed  for  300  metres  along  strike  and  is  open  in  both  directions.    The  sinter  terrace  is  hosted 
within  a  thick  volcaniclastic  sequence  and  displays  cross-cutting  quartz  veining  with  anomalous  gold  values.  
Planned drill holes will test beneath the sinter terrace/fault zone at productive levels beneath paleosurface. 

Bald Peak Flats 

Located southwest of the Bald Peak rhyolite, Bald Peak Flats is a ~1.3 kilometre long by 500 metres wide As, Sb, 
Hg-in-soil anomaly hosted within a volcaniclastic sequence.  The soil anomaly drapes over a local topographic 
high  exhibiting  northeast-trending  chalcedonic  quartz  veins  and  zones  of  silicification,  mapped  by  previous 
operators.  Two historical drill holes are known in this area; however, were not drilled to sufficient depths to test 
the  mineralized  system.    High-level  chalcedonic  quartz,  low  Au  and  pathfinder  elements  (As,  Sb,  Hg)  are 
indicative that this target is at high levels with an epithermal system. 

Little Bald Peak 

Little Bald Peak, located 200 metres lower in elevation and to the northwest of Bald Peak, is a possible side vent 
or  flow  dome  of  the  Bald  Peak  rhyolite.    Where  outcropping,  brittle/fissile  flow-banded  rhyolite  hosts  both 
concordant and discordant <2 mm quartz veins and lenses.  A historical prospecting pit is found on the southern 
side of Little Bald peak; no clear vein or vein orientation was observed but the spoil pile contained fine-grained, 
maroon-coloured jasperoid which returned anomalous Au and high As, Sb, Hg values.  The target displays a high 
As, Sb-in-soil anomaly over Little Bald Peak itself and is located along strike and at higher elevations of a known 
mineralized zone (Great Wall).   

The Great Wall 

The Great Wall is a NNE-trending, steeply dipping, up to 3 metre wide zone containing three parallel quartz veins 
hosted  within  a  trachyandesitic  unit.    The  outcrop  is  exposed  over  a  ~25  metre  strike  length.    Rock  channel 
sampling  returned  relatively  high  Au  values  in  quartz  veins  displaying  slightly  coarser  quartz  crystallinity 
compared  to  the  chalcedonic  quartz  observed  within  other  zones.    This  increase  in  quartz  crystallinity  with  a 
corresponding increase in gold grade is a positive indication that gold grade is increasing with depth.  

NE Sinters 

This  target  contains  an  extensive  area  of  outcrop  and  float  comprising  two  distinct  zones  of  sinter  within  a 
widespread 1.5 kilometre by 600 metres wide As, Sb, Hg-in-soil anomaly.  NE Sinter 1 is a broad topographic 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 7 - 

high with widely distributed sinter outcrops; NE Sinter 2 located on the northern slopes of the Bald Peak rhyolite 
is  identified  by  zones  of  limited  vegetation.    This  target  is  bound  to  the  west  by  an  approximately  north-south 
trending fault that has down dropped and preserved these sinter areas.  The occurrence of sinter combined with 
high As, Sb, Hg pathfinder elements are indicative of being at the top of a fully preserved mineralized system.   

Planned Work at Bald Peak 

During the summer of 2018, as permitting a plan of operations proceeds with the United States Forest Service, the 
Company  intends  to  better  these  targets  by  geophysical  surveys  and  further  geological  and  structural  mapping 
programs.  The permitting process may allow for a late 2018 drill program, but more likely the process will run 
into early 2019 before drilling is authorized. 

Quality Assurance / Quality Control 

The work program at the Bald Peak Property was planned by Company personnel and implemented by Company 
personnel, consultants and contractors.  Rock samples were collected by Company personnel and/or consultants.  
During  the  prospecting  phase,  suitable  certified  reference  materials  were  added  to  the  sample  stream.    Rock 
samples were delivered to ALS Chemex, prepared using method Prep-31, and fire assayed by method Au-ICP21, 
as well as analysed for multi-elements by method code ME-ICP61. 

The soil survey was contracted to Ethos Geological.  Soil samples were collected in kraft bags and sent in sealed 
containers  to  ALS  Geochemistry,  Reno,  Nevada.    All  sample  sites  were  labelled  with  flagging  tape  displaying 
their  unique  sample  number.   The  samples  were sieved  to  minus  180  microns  (Prep-41),  and then analyzed  by 
ICP-MS for 51 elements (method AuME-TL43).  

USA - Nevada – Spring Peak Property 

In  May  2016,  the  Company  acquired  an  option  to  earn  a  100%  interest  in  the  Spring  Peak  gold  property  in 
Mineral County, Nevada, from Kinetic Gold (US) Inc.  The terms of the option agreement are described in the 
Company’s December 31, 2016 annual consolidated financial statements. 

The  Spring  Peak  Property  consists  of  37  contiguous  United  States  Federal  Mineral  Claims  comprising  309 
hectares  located  approximately  37  kilometres  southwest  of  the  town  of  Hawthorne,  Nevada.    The  Property  is 
situated  in  the  historic  Aurora-Borealis-Bodie  mining  district  which  lies  within  the  Walker  Lane  gold  trend  of 
western Nevada.  The gold deposits in the Aurora-Borealis-Bodie district occur as both high grade vein-hosted 
low  sulphidation  deposits  (Aurora,  Bodie),  and  as  high-sulphidation  alunite-kaolinite  gold-deposits  (Borealis).  
Total historical precious metal production along this trend, from the mid-19th century to the mid-1990s, has been 
estimated at 4.0 million ounces Au, and 11.2 million ounces Ag (Gold-Silver Mining Districts, Alteration Zones, 
and  Paleolandforms  in  the  Miocene  Bodie  Hills  Volcanic  Field,  California  and  Nevada.  USGS  Scientific 
Investigations Report 2015-2012). 

The Spring Peak Property is approximately 6 kilometres southeast of the historical open pit mines at Aurora.  At 
Spring  Peak,  a  sinter  terrace  is  exposed  overlying  altered  volcaniclastic  deposits  and  basement  Cretaceous 
granites (USGS, 2012).  The sinter system contains anomalous concentrations of Au, Ag, Hg, Sb, and As.  Recent 
ash fall deposits cover much of the area, but frequent vein float with multi-ppm gold concentrations can be found 
across the Property.  The area was drilled with shallow holes in the 1980s, the majority of which were vertical.  
The sinter terrace and potential structures beneath it were never adequately drill tested.  The Company believes 
the Property has the potential to host subvertical high grade veins as feeders to the sinter terraces. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 8 - 

The  Company  has  completed  a  13-line  CSAMT  survey  (see  news  release  dated  October  19,  2016)  and  has 
generated new drill targets on the Spring Peak Property.  Previous exploration activities by the Company include 
due  diligence  sampling  of  sinter  terraces,  and  vein  float  on  the  Property,  prospecting  along  the  structure  of 
interest,  and  conducting  a  soil  sampling  survey  (100  metre  x  25  metre  grid  oriented  orthogonal  to  the  NE-SW 
targeted structure).   

The Company has completed all the necessary studies for its NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) Plan of 
Operation to drill the Spring Peak Property. A plan of operations has been approved by the United States Forest 
Service for drilling the Property, and the Company is in the final stages of completing the necessary bonding for 
issuance of the drill permit.  Drilling is planned to begin in mid-July 2018.   

USA – Nevada – Coyote Property 

In  March  2018,  the  Company  was  granted  a  lease  and  option  to  purchase  on  the  Coyote  gold  property  from 
Geologic Services Inc. (“Geologic”), adding to the Company’s portfolio of epithermal gold projects in Nevada.  
The property is located in northern Elko County on the eastern flank of the Independence Valley, an area known 
for its prolific gold production.   

The  Coyote  property  consists  of  58  unpatented  mining  claims  located  on  the  east  side  of  a  Tertiary  basin.  
Chalcedonic lenses and siliceous sinter deposits are localized along north-east trending normal faults that form the 
basin boundary and have been traced along strike on the property for 8,500 feet.  The alteration extends into the 
hillsides for 2,000 feet. 

In  1990,  Chevron  Resources  drilled the  Coyote  property  as  part  of  their  Independence Valley  district  program.  
They drilled four angle holes each approximately 800 feet apart, along one of the bounding structures of the basin 
in  the  area  of  the  largest  siliceous  sinter  terrace.    The  holes  ranged  from  240  feet  to  500  feet  deep  maximum 
depth.    All  four  holes  encountered  an  altered  structural  zone  ranging  from  40  feet  to  100  feet  thick  exhibiting 
strong argillic alteration with the rock mostly altered to clay.   

Geochemical  results  of  Chevron’s  drilling  returned  anomalous  values  in  mercury  (high  of  19  ppm),  antimony 
(high of 1,900 ppm) and arsenic (high of 910 ppm) with weak gold values (high of 93 ppb) – geochemical results 
consistent  with  the  top  of  a  low-sulfidation  epithermal  gold  system.    The  deepest  drill  hole  intercepted  the 
structural zone at 125 feet below surface. 

The  results  described  above  are  summarized  from  historical  exploration  data  provided  to  the  Company  by 
Geologic.    The  Company  believes  the  historical  work  was  performed  according  to  best  practices  and  the 
historical exploration data are reliable, but a Qualified Person has not verified the results independently. 

The Company plans to conduct due diligence and exploration field studies this spring and summer on the Coyote 
property,  including  surface  prospecting  and  alteration  mapping,  and  a  geophysical  CSAMT  survey.    The  latter 
will investigate the subsurface along the range-bounding fault in the vicinity of the siliceous sinters for evidence 
of a structural feeder to the hydrothermal system. 
.  

Agreement Terms 

Geologic has granted to the Company a lease of the Coyote property for up to 15 years, in consideration for the 
granting by the Company to Geologic of a 2.0% to 3.0% net smelter return royalty, the percentage to depend on 
the  prevailing  price  of  gold.    In  order  to  keep  the  lease  in  good  standing,  the  Company  has  the  right  to  make 
annual advance royalty payments to the Geologic.  At any time during the term of the lease, the Company may 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 9 - 

elect to acquire a 100% interest in the Coyote property by making a cash payment of US$2.0 million to Geologic.  
The Company has also agreed to reimburse Geologic for the filing costs of a portion of the claims comprising the 
Coyote property.  

USA - Nevada – ABC Property 

In  2016,  the  Company  staked  122  contiguous  United  States  federal  mining  claims  covering  approximately  992 
hectares in in  the  historic Walker  Lane  Gold Trend  in  Mineral  County,  Nevada.   The  ABC  Property  is located 
along  the  structural  trend  that  hosts  the  historical  Aurora  mining  district,  the  Borealis  mine  and  the  historical 
Bodie mining camp in California.  Following detailed analysis and project ranking, the Company decided in 2017 
to allow the ABC Property claims to lapse, in order to focus on higher priority targets in Nevada.   

Mexico – Amalia Project 

The  Amalia  Project  comprises  9,461  hectares  located  in  the  Sierra  Madre  gold  belt  in  the  State  of  Chihuahua, 
Mexico.  In June 2017, the Company signed a binding agreement with a private individual to option 380 hectares 
of the project area which is host to high grade epithermal silver-gold mineralization.  Following the signing of the 
option  agreement,  the  Company  staked  an  additional  9,081  hectares  surrounding  the  Amalia  Project,  covering 
three new regional target areas.   

The  Project  is  located  approximately  25  kilometres  SW  of  the  historic  Guadalupe  y  Calvo  mining  district  in 
Chihuahua, Mexico.  During due diligence evaluation the Company’s geologists sampled bonanza grade outcrop 
containing 20.4 g/t Au and 5,360 g/t Ag from a 1.2 metre chip.  The Company has established a 10 man camp at 
Amalia  and  completed  an  initial  exploration  program  comprising  geological  mapping,  prospecting  and  channel 
sampling  of  the  main  targets.    Epithermal  Au-Ag  mineralization  has  been  sampled  by  the  Company  in  several 
veins, vein breccias and disseminated zones over 3.5 kilometres of strike length and a 600 metre vertical interval 
following the trace of a large regional fault zone. 

Campamento Target 

At the main target area, known as Campamento, a 150 by 300 metre zone of intense silicification, and brecciation 
with  massive  and  stockwork  veining  has  been  mapped  at  the  contact  between  the  upper  Rhyolite  and  lower 
Andesite volcanic sequence.  The zone strikes roughly 350/70E. 

101  continuous  chip  channel  samples  between  1  and  2  metres  wide  were  sampled  across  the  middle  of  the 
Campamento  zone,  as  outcrop  allowed,  representing  the  full  estimated  width  of  the  zone  at  148  metres.    The 
weighted average of all 101 samples was 0.20 g/t Au and 49 g/t Ag.  The main mineralized interval graded: 

62 metres at 0.43 g/t Au and 98 g/t Ag 
   including: 30 metres at 0.58 g/t Au and 151 g/t Ag 

A second, 14 metre wide continuous chip sample (open to expansion) located 60 metres north of the main sample 
line, near a historic tunnel graded: 

14 metres at 1.47 g/t Au and 167 g/t Ag 
   including: 7 metres at 2.37 g/t Au and 239 g/t Ag 

Sampling  conducted  in  the  most  recent  field  campaign  resulted  in  a  new  high-grade  extension  northward  of 
Campamento zone with a continuous rock chip channel assaying 4.5 metres at 10.3 g/t Au and 202 g/t Ag.  This 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 10 - 

extends  the  total  strike  length  of  outcrop  of  the  high  level  chalcedonic  breccias  and  stockwork  zone  at 
Campamento to 500 metres. 

Guadalupe Target 

Located 700 metres southeast of Campamento, and 250 metres vertically below, the Guadalupe target includes a 
historic  tunnel  and  shaft  which  expose  a  high-grade  quartz  sulphide  vein  breccia,  hosted  in  andesite  volcanics.  
The Company collected three continuous chip samples within the historic workings where the main vein is well 
exposed.  The results include: 

Guadalupe shaft:  

Guadalupe tunnel cross-cut: 
Guadalupe tunnel 10 metres above cross-cut: 

including:  

7 metres at 3.62 g/t Au and 1,048 g/t Ag 
4 metres at 6.04 g/t Au and 1,702 g/t Ag 
7 metres at 2.4 g/t Au and 188 g/t Ag  
4 metres at 3.92 g/t Au and 888 g/t Ag  

The sampling at Guadalupe shows consistent high grade over a vertical interval of approximately 60 metres, from 
the upper shaft to lower tunnel.  The area around Guadalupe is steep and bush covered with limited outcrop, hence 
the extent of the mineralized zone is not yet known 

Dulces Target 

Located  800  metres  northeast  of  Campamento,  at  roughly  similar  elevation,  the  Dulces  vein  is  exposed  in  an 
historic underground tunnel within an extensive area of argillic altered andesite volcanics.  The vein varies from 1 
to 1.5 metres and chip samples of the vein within the short 15 metre tunnel returned: 

AM377:   1 metre at 34 g/t Au and 13 g/t Ag 
AM378:   1 metre at 20.3 g/t Au and 44 g/t Ag 
AM379:   1.5 metres at 114.5 g/t Au and 57 g/t Ag 

The Company is currently negotiating access with the landowner for a trenching and sampling program at Dulces. 

Exploration Summary 

During the past several months, the Company has focused its exploration efforts on defining drill targets within 
the central area covering the Campamento and Guadalupe targets at Amalia over strike length of approximately 1 
kilometre  and  vertical  interval  of  250  metres.    A  new  discovery  located  between  Campamento  and  Guadalupe, 
called San Pedro, returned 13 metres at 2.51 g/t Au and 164 g/t Ag in a continuous chip (10 samples) across the 
discovery outcrop.  New sampling 50 metres vertically above and along strike from Guadalupe returned 8 metres 
at 0.21 g/t Au and 264 g/t Ag (8 samples).  

The Company has now defined a central corridor of mineralization, along the north-west trending major structural 
break.  In the north at Campamento, a 500 metre x 70 metre zone of intense silicification, and brecciation with 
massive  and  stockwork  veining  has  been  mapped  at  the  contact  between  the  upper  rhyolite  and  lower  andesite 
volcanic  sequence.   The  mineralization  at  Campamento  is  hosted  in  high  level white  chalcedonic  banded veins 
and breccias.  Southeast along the fault system and vertically down in the system, the mineralization transitions 
from  Campamento  style rhyolite-hosted chalcedonic  silica  veins, to  andesite-hosted  sulphide  rich fault  breccias 
observed  at  San  Pedro  and  Guadalupe,  where  the  mineralization  is  narrower  and  higher  grade  as  shown  at  San 
Pedro 300 metres south and 175 metres lower with 13 metres at 2.51 g/t Au and 164 g/t Ag.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 11 - 

Geologically similar gold-silver epithermal deposits of the Sierra Madre belt have mineralization defined over a 
vertical  interval  of  600  to  700  metres,  and  the  transition  from  upper  rhyolite  hosted  mineralization  into  higher 
grade  andesite  host  at  depth  is  commonly  observed.    The  Company  believes  that  the  system  is  preserved  at 
Amalia and along the controlling regional fault system mineralization occurs over a 600 metre vertical interval.  
The  Company  plans  to target  high  grade  mineralization  at  depth  below  the  Campamento  silica  zone  and at  the 
Guadalupe  and  San  Pedro  targets.    Maps  and  photos  of  the  Amalia  Project  are  available  on  the  Company’s 
website. 

Quality Assurance / Quality Control 

Sampling at Amalia followed a standardized protocol to ensure representative and unbiased quantities of material 
from across each sample.  Chip samples were taken using hammer and chisel continuously along the walls of the 
underground mines and cleaned surface outcrops.  Nominally widths were between 1 and 2 metres.  Continuous 
chip samples were taken across strike and are the best estimate of true width.  

The  Company  utilizes  industry-standard  QA/QC  program.    Rock  samples  were  prepared  and  analyzed  at  ALS 
laboratories in Mexico and Canada.  Blanks and certified reference standards are inserted into the sample stream 
to monitor laboratory performance and the results have been within acceptable limits. 

Option Terms 

The Company can earn a 100% interest in the Amalia Project by making cash payments to the property owner 
staged  payments  over  a  period  of  five  years  totaling  US$845,000  (US$10,000  paid)  and,  subject  to  stock 
exchange approval, US$15,000 in shares of the Company.  

Mexico – Tarros Project 

After conducting a detailed mapping and sampling program, the Company relinquished in January 2018 its option 
to  acquire  the  473-hectare  Tarros  Project  located  50  kilometres  north  of  the  Company’s  Amalia  Project  in  the 
Sierra Madre Gold Silver belt in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico.  

Mexico – Lithium Brine Project 

The  Company  holds  a  10,000  hectare  application at Salar  Viesca in  Coahuila  State,  Mexico.   The  Company  is 
identifying lithium companies to initiate discussions on a joint venture on this lithium brine project. 

Highlights of the Viesca project include: 

•  The project is located in large, salar closed basins, in geological settings analogous to the Clayton Valley 

Basin, Nevada, host of Albemarle’s Silver Peak lithium producing mine operation. 

•  The Company conducted controlled surface samples which delivered numerous anomalous lithium results 

including 189 ppm Li. 
•  Region is underexplored. 
•  Mexico  is  considered  a  mining  friendly  jurisdiction.    The  area  has  excellent  infrastructure  and  is  road 

accessible, allowing for potentially low exploration costs. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key geographical highlights similar to Clayton Valley and/or associated with brine deposits:  

- 12 - 

•  Located in a desert climate with historic evaporate ponds. 
•  Large closed basin salar targets. 
•  Suitable lithium source-rocks.  
•  Subsurface highly saline aquifers described in historic data. 

Guatemala - Southeast Guatemala Ag-Au Epithermal Fields 

As a result of continued uncertainty surrounding the granting of both exploration and exploitation concessions in 
Guatemala, and a general increase in the level of anti-mining activism in many parts of the country, the Company 
ceased its ongoing exploration activities in the country in the third quarter of 2013 though care and maintenance 
of the properties continue.  Management will reassess the Company’s plans for this country on a regular basis and 
exploration  activities  may  be  ramped  back  up  if  the  mining  investment  climate  improves.    Discussions  are 
underway with a number of potential partners to joint venture this ground. 

Royalty Interests 

Guatemala – Tambor Project Royalty 

In 2012, the Company sold its interest in its subsidiary, Exploraciones Mineras de Guatemala S.A., which holds 
the Tambor gold project in Guatemala, to Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”), giving KCA a 100% interest 
in  the  project.    In  part  consideration  therefor,  KCA  agreed  that  upon  commercial  production  at  Tambor,  KCA 
would commence making royalty payments to the Company. 

Commercial production commenced in December 2014 and royalty payments are now due to the Company based 
on the price of gold at the time and the number of ounces of gold produced as follows: 

Gold Price (US$) 
Below $1,200 
$1,201 - $1,300 
$1,301 - $1,400 
$1,401 - $1,500 
$1,501 and greater 

Per Ounce of Gold 
$100 
$125 
$150 
$200 
$250 

up to a maximum of US$10.0 million.  After the US$10.0 million has been paid and cumulative gold production 
from the Tambor Project has exceeded 100,000 ounces, the cash payments will be based on the then price of gold 
and the number of ounces of gold produced as follows: 

Gold Price (US$) 
Below $1,500 
$1,501 - $1,750 
$1,751 - $2,000 
$2,001 and greater 

Per Ounce of Gold 
$25 
$35 
$40 
$50 

Receipt of royalty payments by the Company commenced during the third quarter of 2015.  To date, the Company 
has recognized net royalty income of $1,530,555 of which $746,375 has been received to date. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 13 - 

On May 11, 2016, KCA informed the Company that mining operations were suspended by the Supreme Court of 
Guatemala due to a lack of consultation by the Guatemalan Ministry of Mines with local indigenous people when 
the mine was permitted in 2011.  To date, the Supreme Court has not made a decision on when the mine may re-
open.  The Company has allowed KCA to defer payment of the remaining receivable balance while KCA prepares 
a legal strategy to overturn the suspension of operations and seek compensation from the Guatemalan authorities, 
from  which  the  Company  would  benefit  as  well.    Due  to  these  circumstances,  for  accounting  purposes,  a 
provision was recorded against the KCA receivable in the 2016 fiscal year. 

Mexico - Tlacolula Property Royalty 

In July 2017, the Company completed the sale of its Tlacolula silver property, Mexico to Fortuna in consideration 
for a cash payment of US$150,000, 239,385 common shares of Fortuna, and a 2% NSR royalty on the property. 
Fortuna  retains  the  right  to  purchase  one-half  of  the  royalty  by  paying  the  Company  US$1.5  million.  The 
Company and Fortuna are related parties. 

Peru – Bayovar 12 Project Royalty 

In April 2015, the Company purchased from CROPS a production royalty, equivalent to a 2% net smelter return, 
on  CROPS’  70%  interest  in  future  phosphate  production  from  the  Bayovar  12  project  located  in  the  Sechura 
district of northern Peru.  The purchase price for the royalty was US$1.0 million.  CROPS had the right until April 
15, 2016 to buy back one-half of the royalty for US$1.0 million, but did not elect to make such purchase.  Should 
the Company decide at any time in the future to sell the royalty, CROPS will retain a first right of refusal.  In May 
2016, CROPS published a pre-feasibility study for production of phosphate rock concentrate from the Bayovar 12 
project.  The Company and CROPS are related parties.   

Nicaragua – San Jose Royalty 

In 2013, an agreement was reached whereby the Company would sell to B2Gold its 40% interest in the San Jose 
and La Magnolia properties in consideration of a 2% NSR royalty on each property, and B2Gold would have the 
right to purchase one-half of each royalty for US$1.0 million.  The Company and B2Gold subsequently decided to 
relinquish the La Magnolia concession.  Closing of the San Jose sale, and the royalty grant to the Company, took 
place on in 2015. 

Outlook 

The  Company  continues  to  conduct  its  property  investigations  in  various  jurisdictions  and  with  various 
commodities but with a focus on gold and silver in Nevada and Mexico. The Company’s geologists are using a 
low  cost  and  effective  method  of  field  testing  targets  that  are  generated  through  desktop  research  and  through 
submittals. 

Qualified  Person:  Bruce  A  Smith,  M.Sc.,  MAIG.,  a  member  of  the  Australian  Institute  of  Geoscientists,  is  the 
Company’s Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, and has approved the disclosure of the 
technical information in this MD&A.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selected Annual Information 

- 14 - 

The following table sets forth selected annual financial information of the Company for, and as at, the end of each 
of the last three financial years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015: 

Royalty income 
Investment and other income 
Exploration expenditures 
Net income (loss) for the year 

Total 
Basic & fully diluted per share  

Total assets 
Total long-term liabilities 
Cash dividends 

2017 ($) 
- 
10,673 
1,140,432 

194,003 
0.00 
10,188,369 
- 
- 

2016 ($) 
431,643 
13,068 
544,586 

1,862,266 
0.02 
9,848,863 
- 
- 

2015 ($) 
1,098,912 
17,293 
589,162 

(1,875,449) 
(0.02) 
7,088,017 
- 
- 

The  Company  first  started  recording  royalty  income  in  the  2015  fiscal  year  as  a  result  of  the  previously  held 
Tambor Project going into production in December 2014.  Royalty revenue was less in the 2016 fiscal year due to 
the suspension of mine operations since May 2016. 

Quarterly Information 

The following table provides information for the eight fiscal quarters ended December 31, 2017: 

Quarter ended 

Dec. 31, 
2017 ($) 

Sep. 30, 
2017 ($) 

June 30, 
2017 ($) 

Mar. 31, 
2017 ($) 

Royalty revenue, net 

Investment and other income 

- 

2,213 

- 

1,973 

- 

2,438 

- 

4,049 

Dec. 31, 
2016 ($) 

47,960 

4,689 

Sep. 30, 
2016 ($) 

26,973 

4,764 

June 30, 
2016 ($) 

Mar. 31, 
2016 ($) 

135,303 

221,407 

2,930 

685 

Exploration 
   expenditures 

373,698 

421,265 

260,902 

84,567 

102,932 

215,591 

107,590 

Net income (loss)  

(620,477) 

1,024,002 

(569,184) 

359,662 

(1,101,528) 

738,793 

2,320,061 

118,473 

(95,060) 

Basic and diluted 
   income (loss) per share  

(0.01) 

0.01 

(0.01) 

0.00 

(0.01) 

0.01 

0.02 

(0.00) 

The Company recorded royalty revenue from production at the Tambor Project up to the quarter ended June 30, 
2016, the period in which mining operations were suspended.  The royalty revenue recorded in the following two 
quarters was due to adjustments to income recorded in the prior periods.  The quarter ended September 30, 2017 
recorded a net income due to a gain of $1,658,928 on the sale of the Tlacolula property. The quarter ended March 
31,  2017  recorded a  net income  due  to  a  gain  of  $606,664 from  a  property  assignment  agreement. The  quarter 
ended September 30, 2016 recorded a net income due to a gain on the sale of available-for-sale investments of 
$697,610  resulting  from  the  disposition  of  B2Gold  and  Southern  Silver  shares  and  a  gain  of  $311,252  from 
mineral  property  option  agreement  payments  consisting  of  cash  and  common  shares  received  from  Advantage. 
The  quarter  ended  June  30,  2016  recorded  a  net  income  due  to  the  disposition  of  B2Gold  and  Southern  Silver 
shares resulting in a gain of $1,818,398 and a gain of $520,727 on the reclassification of an investment. 

Results of Operations  

Quarter ended December 31, 2017 

The quarter ended December 31, 2017 had a net loss of $620,477 compared to $1,101,528 for the quarter ended 
December  31,  2016,  a  decrease  of  $481,051.    The  comparative  quarter’s  loss  was  higher  primarily  due  to  a 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 15 - 

provision for impairment of a receivable of $784,180 relating to royalty revenue from the Tambor Project that is 
yet to be paid.  The current quarter also recorded a gain on sale of available-for-sale investments of $167,808 and 
a  gain  of  $204,252  on  the  fair  value  of  derivative  investments.    The  derivative  investments  consist  of  share 
purchase warrants that were acquired along with common shares in private placement investments.  There were 
no  such  gains  recorded  for  the  comparative  year.      However,  the  current  quarter  also  recorded  an  impairment 
charge of $456,615 on available-for-sale investments compared to $63,401 in the comparative quarter.  

Exploration  expenditures  in  the  current  quarter  totaled  $373,698  compared  to  $102,932  in  the  comparative 
quarter, an increase of $270,766.  Exploration expenditures include property investigation costs which relate to 
evaluating new opportunities and exploration activities on properties held by the Company. 

General  and  administrative  expenses  for  the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2017  were  $129,728  compared  to 
$358,417  for  the  comparative  quarter,  a  decrease  of  $228,689.  This  decrease  is  mostly  due  to  the  comparative 
quarter  recording  a  share-based  compensation  expense  of  $213,150  relating  to  the  issuance  of  stock  options 
whereas there was no such charge for the current quarter.   

Year ended December 31, 2017 

The  year  ended  December  31,  2017  had a  net income  of  $194,003  compared to  $1,862,266  for the  year ended 
December 31, 2016, a decrease of $1,668,263.  Exploration expenditures in the current year totaled $1,140,432 
compared to $544,586 in the comparative year, an increase of $595,846.  Besides less exploration expenditures 
being incurred in the comparative year, the comparative year also recorded royalty income of $431,643 compared 
to none for the current year.    

The current year net income includes a gain of $1,658,928 on the sale of the Tlacolula property in addition to a 
gain  of  $606,664  on  a  property  assignment  agreement  with  Volcanic  and  the  gain  of  $204,252  on  derivative 
investments.  There were no such gains in the comparative year though it did record a gain on sale of available-
for-sale investments of $2,688,336 compared to $204,346 for the current year. Both the current and comparative 
years  also  recorded  impairment  charges  relating  to  available-for-sale  investments  which  were  $839,555  and 
$205,321 respectively.  

General  and  administrative  expenses  for  the  current  year  were  $407,942  compared  to  $701,432  for  the 
comparative  year,  a  decrease  of  $293,490.    As  in  the  quarterly  comparison,  the  comparative  year  included  the 
share-based payment expense of $213,150 whereas there was no such charge for the current year. All general and 
administrative expenses in the current year, except for regulatory fees and travel costs, were lower than those in 
the comparative year. The most notable cost decreases were in office and miscellaneous, salaries, and legal and 
audit fees.  Office and salary costs were lower in the current year due to the Company’s portion of shared office 
lease and personnel costs being reduced. Legal and audit fees were lower in the current year due to the timing of 
audit fees. 

Mineral Properties Expenditures 

A summary of the Company’s expenditures on its mineral properties during the year ended December 31, 2017 is 
as follows: 

United States – A total of $492,991 was incurred on property investigation and exploration related costs, of which 
$15,727 was on general property investigation, $33,505 on the Spring Peak property, and $443,759 on the Bald 
Peak property.  Acquisition costs totaling $117,816 were also incurred on the Bald Peak property. 

Mexico  -  A  total  of  $510,010  was  incurred  on  exploration,  property  investigation,  and  miscellaneous 
administrative costs, of which $227,551 was incurred on the Amalia property and $39,839 on the Tarros property.  
Acquisition costs totaling $13,348 were also recorded for the Amalia property. 

Guatemala – A total of $50,834 was incurred on property investigation and care and maintenance related costs. 

 
 
 
 
- 16 - 

Other  –  A  total  of  $86,597  was  incurred  on  property  investigation  and  care  and  maintenance  related  costs  in 
regions other than USA, Mexico and Guatemala. 

Further details regarding exploration expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 are provided 
in the schedules at the end of this MD&A. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents decreased from $5.13 million at December 31, 2016 to $3.32 million at 
December 31, 2017.  As at December 31, 2017, working capital was $8.38 million compared to $8.22 million at 
December  31,  2016.    Included  in  working  capital  is the  value  of  the  Company’s  available-for-sale  investments 
which as at December 31, 2017 had a fair value of $4.94 million compared to $2.79 million as at December 31, 
2016.    A  significant  transaction  that  decreased  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  increased  available-for-sale 
investment value during the current year was the acquisition of 1,959,000 common shares of Volcanic at a cost of 
$575,100 by way of private placements. Available-for-sale investments also increased in the current year due to 
the  receipt  of  1,263,883  common  shares  of  Volcanic  with  a  fair  value  of  $606,664  at  the  time  of  issuance, 
pursuant to a mineral property assignment agreement, and the receipt of 239,385 Fortuna shares with a fair value 
of $1,491,369 at the time of issuance, pursuant to the Tlacolula mineral property sale. 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold 93,000 Southern Silver shares for net proceeds of 
$41,188 and sold 250,000 Advantage shares for net proceeds of $262,808. 

The Company held 3,973,275 common shares in Rackla with a fair value of $456,927 as at December 31, 2017; 
however, the investment is being accounted for as an investment in associate, using the equity method, since the 
Company may be able to exercise significant influence on Rackla.  During the year ended December 31, 2017, the 
Company acquired an additional 1,000,000 common share in Rackla upon the exercise of share purchase warrants 
at a cost of $50,000. 

The Company did not earn any royalty revenue from the previously held Tambor Project during the current year 
as the operations at Tambor continue to be suspended.   

The Company intends to use the proceeds from any sales of its equity investments, option payments received and 
royalty  income  payments  received  to  fund  its  exploration  programs,  investment  opportunities,  and  general 
working capital requirements. The Company expects its current capital resources to be sufficient to carry out its 
exploration and investment plans and operating costs for the next twelve months. 

Commitment 

The  Company  has  entered  into  an  operating  lease  agreement  for  its  office  premises.  The  Company  also  rents 
space to other companies related by common directors and officers on a month to month basis, the amounts of 
which are netted against rental expense; however, there are no commitments from these companies and thus the 
amounts presented below are the gross commitments.  The annual commitments under the lease are as follows: 

2018 
2019 

 $            190,608 
190,608  
 $            381,216  

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Financial Instruments and Risk Management 

The Company is exposed to the following financial risks: 

- 17 - 

•  Market Risk 
•  Credit Risk 
•  Liquidity Risk 

In  common  with  all  other  businesses,  the  Company  is  exposed  to  risks  that  arise  from  its  use  of  financial 
instruments.  This section describes the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks 
and  the  methods  used  to  measure  them.  Further  quantitative  information  in  respect  of  these  risks  is  presented 
throughout the accompanying financial statements. 

General Objectives, Policies and Processes 

The  Board  of  Directors  has  overall  responsibility  for  the  determination  of  the  Company’s  risk  management 
objectives  and  policies  and,  whilst  retaining  ultimate  responsibility  for  them,  it  has  delegated  the  authority  for 
designing and operating processes that ensure the effective implementation of the objectives and policies to the 
Company’s  finance  function.  The  Board  of  Directors  receives  periodic  reports  through  which  it  reviews  the 
effectiveness of the processes put in place and the appropriateness of the objectives and policies it sets. 

The  overall  objective  of  the  Board  is  to  set  policies  that  seek  to  reduce  risk  as  far  as  possible  without  unduly 
affecting  the  Company’s  competitiveness  and  flexibility.  Further  details  regarding  these  policies  are  set  out 
below. 

a)  Market Risk 

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of 
changes in market prices. Market prices are comprised of three types of risk: foreign currency risk, interest rate 
risk, and equity price risk. 

Foreign Currency Risk 

Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate 
because  of  changes  in  foreign  exchange  rates.  The  Company  is  exposed  to  fluctuations  in  foreign  currencies 
through its operations in foreign countries.  The Company monitors this exposure, but has no hedge positions. As 
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company is exposed to currency risk through the following financial assets 
and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the Canadian dollar: 

December 31, 2017 

December 31, 2016 

 US Dollar  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 Mexican 
Peso  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

Guatemala 
Quetzal  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 Nicaragua 
Cordoba  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 US Dollar  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 Mexican 
Peso  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

Guatemala 
Quetzal  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

 Nicaragua 
Cordoba  
 (CDN 
equivalent)  

Cash 
Receivables 
Current liabilities 

 $   172,803  
-  
 (74,910) 

 $      3,969  
59,386  
 (28,409) 

 $              -  
2,899 
 (896) 

 $         574  
-  
 - 

 $     20,012  
-  
 (11,507) 

 $        930  
27,047  
 (4,439) 

 $           24  
2,872 
 (1,609) 

 $         525  
-  
 (7,706) 

 $     97,893  

 $    34,946  

 $       2,003  

 $         574 

 $       8,505  

 $    23,538  

 $       1,287  

 $    (7,181) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
- 18 - 

Based  on  the  above  net  exposures  at  December 31,  2017,  a  10%  depreciation  or  appreciation  of  the  above 
currencies  against  the  Canadian  dollar  would  result  in  approximately  a  $13,500  (2016:  $2,600)  increase  or 
decrease in profit or loss, respectively. 

Commodity Price Risk 

The Company’s royalty revenue is derived from a royalty interest that is based on the extraction and sale of gold. 
Factors  beyond  the  control  of  the  Company  may  affect  the  marketability  of  gold  discovered.  Gold  prices  have 
historically fluctuated widely. Consequently, the economic viability of the Company’s royalty interest cannot be 
accurately predicted and may be adversely affected by fluctuations in gold prices. The Company has not engaged 
in any hedging activities. 

Interest Rate Risk 

Interest rate risk is the risk that future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates.  The 
Company  does  not  have  any  borrowings.  Interest  rate  risk  is  limited  to  potential  decreases  on  the  interest  rate 
offered on cash held with chartered Canadian financial institutions. The Company considers this risk to be limited 
as it holds no assets or liabilities subject to variable rates of interest. 

Equity Price Risk 

Equity price risk is the uncertainty associated with the valuation of assets arising from changes in equity markets.  
The  Company’s  available-for-sale  investments  consisting  of  common  shares  and  derivative  investments 
consisting of share purchase warrants are exposed to significant equity price risk due to the potentially volatile 
and  speculative  nature  of  the  businesses  in  which  the  investments  are  held.  The  available-for-sale  investments 
held in Advantage, CROPS, Fortuna, GrowMax, Medgold, Southern Silver, ValGold, Volcanic, and War Eagle 
and the warrants held in CROPS, Volcanic, ValGold and War Eagle are monitored by the Board with decisions on 
sale  taken  by  Management.    A  10%  decrease  in  fair  value  of  the  shares  and  warrants  would  result  in  an 
approximate $514,000 decrease in comprehensive income and shareholders’ equity.  

b)  Credit Risk 

Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its 
contractual  obligations.  The  Company’s  credit  risk  is  primarily  attributable  to  its  cash  and  cash  equivalents, 
available-for-sale  investments,  derivative  investments  and  receivables.  The  Company  limits  exposure  to  credit 
risk by  maintaining its cash and cash equivalents with large financial institutions. The Company does not have 
cash and cash equivalents or available-for-sale investments that are invested in asset based commercial paper. For 
advances and other receivables, the Company estimates, on a continuing basis, the probable losses and provides a 
provision for losses based on the estimated realizable value.  

c)  Liquidity Risk 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.  The 
Company’s  approach  to  managing  liquidity  risk  is  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that  it  will  have  sufficient 
funds to meet liabilities when due.  The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows required by 
operations and anticipated investing and financing activities.  

Related Party Transactions 

The  Company  had  transactions  during  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017  and  2016  with  related  parties  who 
consisted of directors, officers and the following companies with common directors: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 19 - 

 Related party 
Mill Street Services Ltd. (“Mill Street”) 
Gold Group Management Inc. (“Gold Group”) 
Fortuna  
CROPS  
Medgold  
Volcanic  
Rackla (Associate) 

Nature of transactions 
Management fees 
Shared general and administrative expenses 
Shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment and shared general and administrative expenses 
Investment 

The  Company  incurred  the  following  expenditures  charged  by  non-key  management  officers  and  companies 
which have common directors with the Company during the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: 

General and administrative expenses: 

Salaries and benefits 
Exploration expenditures: 

Geological fees 
Salaries and benefits 

Three months ended 
December 31, 
2016 

2017 

Year ended 
December 31, 
2016 

2017 

 $          6,800  

 $        10,000  

 $        21,200  

 $        36,827  

10,648  
-  

18,542  
163  

57,688  
7,087  

18,542  
4,326  

 $        17,448  

 $        28,705  

 $        85,975  

 $        59,695  

The Company reimburses Gold Group, a company controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, for 
shared administrative costs and other business related expenses paid by Gold Group on behalf of the Company.  
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company reimbursed Gold Group the following: 

General and administrative expenses: 

Office and miscellaneous 
Shareholder communications 
Salaries and benefits 
Transfer agent and regulatory fees 
Travel and accommodation 

Three months ended 
December 31, 
2016 

2017 

Year ended December 31, 
2016 

2017 

 $        10,584  
74  
28,677  
22  
3,018  

 $        10,619  
-  
30,923  
522  
2,013  

 $        43,434  
1,594  
103,967  
3,983  
11,900  

 $        41,263  
1,289  
118,658  
3,378  
9,327  

 $        42,375  

 $        44,077  

 $      164,878  

 $      173,915  

Exploration expenditures 

 $                  -  

 $          2,930  

 $                  -  

 $          2,930  

Gold Group salary and benefits costs for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include those for the Chief 
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.   

Prepaid expenses and deposits include an amount of $1,142 (2016: $5,797) paid to Gold Group for shared office 
and administrative services. 

Long-term deposits as of December 31, 2017 include an amount of $60,000 (2016: $60,000) paid to Gold Group 
as a deposit on the shared office and administrative services agreement. 

Amounts  due  from  related  parties  consist  of  $Nil  (2016:  $13,693)  due  from  Medgold,  a  company  which  has  a 
common director with the Company, arising from shared administrative costs and $Nil (2016: $3,107) due from 

 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
- 20 - 

CROPS,  a  company  which  has  two  common  directors  with  the  Company,  arising  from  shared  administrative 
costs. These amounts were unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. 

Accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities  include  $44,471  (2016:  $2,828)  payable  to  Gold  Group  for  shared 
administrative costs, and $2,594 (2016: $4,033) to a Director of the Company for geological fees. 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the following transactions also occurred: 

i)  The Company acquired 510,250 common shares of CROPS on the open market for a cost of $74,986. 

ii)  The  Company  acquired  685,675  common  shares  of  CROPS  by  way  of  private  placement  at  a  cost  of 

$137,135. 

iii)  The  Company  received  net  cash  of  $187,710  and  239,385  common  shares  of  Fortuna  with  a  fair  value  of 

$1,472,218 as proceeds on the sale of a mineral property to Fortuna. 

iv)  The  Company  acquired  1,959,000  common  shares  of  Volcanic  by  way  of  private  placements  for  a  cost  of 
$575,100 and received 1,263,883 common shares with a fair value of $606,664 pursuant to a mineral property 
assignment agreement. 

v)  The Company acquired 1,000,000 common shares of Rackla upon the exercise of 1,000,000 share purchase 

warrants at a cost of $50,000. 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the following transactions also occurred: 

i)  The Company acquired 562,500 common shares of CROPS of which 192,500 shares were acquired by way of 
a  private  placement  for  a  cost  of  $50,050,  another  192,500  shares  acquired  upon  the  exercise  of  share 
purchase warrants at a cost of $57,750, and 177,500 shares acquired on the open market for a cost of $65,159.  

ii)  The Company acquired 2,000,000 common shares of Medgold upon the exercise of 2,000,000 share purchase 

warrants at a cost of $300,000.   

Key management compensation 

Key management personnel are persons responsible for planning, directing and controlling the activities of an 
entity, and include certain directors and officers. Key management compensation comprises: 

Three months ended 
December 31, 
2016 

2017 

Year ended 
December 31, 
2016 

2017 

Management fees 
Geological fees 
Salaries, benefits and fees 
Share-based payments 

 $        10,500  
15,000  
9,946  
-  

 $        10,500  
15,000  
8,708  
49,000  

 $        42,000  
60,000  
33,321  
-  

 $        42,000  
60,000  
34,833  
49,000  

 $        35,446  

 $        83,208  

 $      135,321  

 $      185,833  

Total share-based payments to directors not included in the above table during the year ended December 31, 2017 
was $Nil (2016: $55,125). 

Other Data  

Additional information related to the Company is available for viewing at www.sedar.com.  

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
Share Position and Outstanding Options 

- 21 - 

As at April 26, 2018, the Company’s outstanding share position is 86,675,617 common shares and the following 
incentive stock options are outstanding: 

Number of 
options 
           1,245,000  
              100,000  
           100,000  
1,885,000  
1,740,000 

           5,070,000  

STOCK OPTIONS 
Exercise 
price 
$0.29 
$0.36 
$0.69 
$0.20 
$0.15 

Expiry date 
January 7, 2020 
May 25, 2020 
September 23, 2020 
December 12, 2022 
October 18, 2026 

Investments in Associates 

Rackla 

The Company currently has an investment in one associated company, Rackla, which is equity accounted for in the 
consolidated financial statements.   

As at December 31, 2017, the Company held 3,973,275 (2016: 2,973,275) common shares of Rackla, representing 
19.8%  (2016:  19.7%)  of  Rackla’s  outstanding  common  shares.  During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  the 
Company  exercised  its 1,000,000  share  purchase  warrants for 1,000,000  common  shares  of  Rackla at a  cost  of 
$50,000.  The Rackla share purchase warrants were not tradable on an exchange. 

The following table shows the continuity of the Company’s interest in Rackla for the period from January 1, 2016 
to December 31, 2017: 

Balance, December 31, 2015 and 2016 
Increase in investment 
Less: share of losses in associate 

Balance, December 31, 2017 

 $                   1  
50,000  
(50,000)  

 $                   1  

Prior to the 2015 fiscal year the Company’s share of losses in Rackla exceeded the carrying value of its interest 
and therefore the Company discontinued recognizing its share of further losses. During the 2017 fiscal year, with 
the additional 1,000,000 common shares being purchased at a cost of $50,000, the Company recognized losses in 
Rackla totaling $50,000 and once again reduced the carrying amount to a nominal $1 as at December 31, 2017. 
The cumulative unrecognized share of losses for the associate is $567,382. 

The financial statement balances of Rackla are as follows: 

Total current assets 
Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Net loss 

December 31, 
2017 

December 31, 
2016 

 $         250,862  
316,474  
225,230  
130,627  

 $           36,537  
104,597  
133,476  
219,288  

 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
- 22 - 

At December 31, 2017, the fair value of the 3,973,275 common shares of Rackla was $456,927 (2016: $445,991 
fair value of 2,973,275 common shares). 

Medgold 

As  at  December  31,  2017,  the  Company  held  10,040,000  (2016:  10,040,000)  common  shares  of  Medgold, 
representing 11.2% of Medgold’s outstanding common shares. 

Medgold previously met the definition of an associate and was equity accounted for in the consolidated financial 
statements.    In  2016,  Medgold  no  longer  met  the  definition  of  an  associate  when  its  interest  in  Medgold  was 
further diluted to a level significantly below 20% on June 17, 2016 when Medgold issued 10,000,000 common 
shares  by  way  of  a  private  placement  to  a  third  party.    Therefore,  the  Company’s  investment  in  Medgold  was 
reclassified as an available-for-sale investment. Upon discontinuing the use of the equity method, an investment, 
if a financial asset, is to be measured at fair value and the difference between the fair value and the carrying value 
of  the  investment  recognized  in  profit  or  loss.    The  fair  value  of  the  investment  in  Medgold  as  at  the  time  of 
reclassification  was  $1,095,600  and  its  carrying  cost  was  $403,873.  As  a  result,  a  gain  of  $691,727  was 
recognized in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 
2016.   

From  January  1,  2016  and  until  the  point  of reclassification  to  an  available-for-sale  investment  during the  year 
ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s shareholdings in Medgold decreased from 15.5% to 12.6% as a result 
of  an  increase  in  the  issued  capital  of  Medgold.  Accordingly,  the  Company  recorded  a  gain  on  dilution  of 
$170,045 for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

The following table shows the continuity of the Company’s interest in Medgold for the period from January 1, 
2016 to December 31, 2016: 

Balance, December 31, 2015 
Less: share of losses in associate 

Gain on dilution 
Reclassification to an available-for-sale investment 

Balance, December 31, 2016  

The financial statement balances of Medgold are as follows: 

Total current assets 
Total assets 
Total liabilities 
Net loss(2) 

 $              369,828  
(136,000)  

170,045 
(403,873) 

 $                          -  

June 30, 
2016(1) 

 $          1,507,091  
2,039,702  
497,674 

1,016,621  

(1)  June 30, 2016 was the last financial statements of Medgold used for the accounting treatment as an investment in associate. 
(2)  Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2016. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 23 - 

Future Changes in Accounting Policies 

The following new standard has been issued by the IASB but is not yet effective: 

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments  

IFRS 9 will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and IFRIC 9 Reassessment of 
Embedded Derivatives. The final version of this new standard supersedes the requirements of earlier versions of 
IFRS 9.  

The main features introduced by this new standard compared with predecessor IFRS are as follows: 

•  Classification and measurement of financial assets: 

Debt instruments are classified and measured on the basis of the entity's business model for managing the 
asset  and  its  contractual  cash  flow  characteristics  as  either:  “amortized  cost”,  “fair  value  through  other 
comprehensive income”, or “fair value through profit or loss” (default). Equity instruments are classified 
and measured as “fair value through profit or loss” unless upon initial recognition elected to be classified 
as “fair value through other comprehensive income”.  
•  Classification and measurement of financial liabilities: 

• 

When an entity elects to measure a financial liability at fair value, gains or losses due to changes in the 
entity’s own credit risk is recognized in other comprehensive income (as opposed to previously profit or 
loss). This change may be adopted early in isolation of the remainder of IFRS 9.  
Impairment of financial assets: 
An  expected  credit  loss  impairment  model  replaced  the  incurred  loss  model  and  is  applied  to  financial 
assets at “amortized cost” or “fair value through other comprehensive income”, lease receivables, contract 
assets  or  loan  commitments  and  financial  guarantee  contracts.  An  entity  recognizes  twelve-month 
expected  credit  losses  if  the  credit  risk  of  a  financial  instrument  has  not  increased  significantly  since 
initial recognition and lifetime expected credit losses otherwise. 

•  Hedge accounting: 

Hedge accounting remains a choice, however, is now available for a broader range of hedging strategies. 
Voluntary termination of a hedging relationship is no longer permitted. Effectiveness testing now needs to 
be performed prospectively only. Entities may elect to continue to applying IAS 39 hedge accounting on 
adoption  of  IFRS  9  (until  the  IASB  has  completed  its  separate  project  on  the  accounting  for  open 
portfolios and macro hedging). 

Effective for the Company's annual period beginning January 1, 2018.  The Company expects the above standard 
to have a significant impact on the presentation of its consolidated financial statements and are currently in the 
process of evaluating its impact on its consolidated financial statements. 

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers  

IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers specifies how and when revenue should be recognized as well 
as  requiring  more  informative  and  relevant  disclosures.  The  standard  supersedes  IAS  18  Revenue,  IAS  11 
Construction Contracts, and a number of revenue-related interpretations. Application of the standard is mandatory 
and  it  applies  to  nearly  all  contracts  with  customers:  the  main  exceptions  are  leases,  financial  instruments  and 
insurance  contracts.  IFRS  15  is  effective  for  annual  periods  starting  on  or  after  January  1,  2018,  with  earlier 
application permitted.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- 24 - 

IFRS 16 Leases  

On January 13, 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 Leases of which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities 
for most leases. For lessors, there is little change to the existing accounting in IAS 17 Leases. The new standard 
will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. Early application is permitted, provided 
the new revenue standard, IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, has been applied, or is applied at the 
same date as IFRS 16.  

IFRIC Interpretation 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration.  

On  December  8,  2016,  the  IASB  issued  IFRIC  Interpretation  22  Foreign  Currency  Transactions  and  Advance 
Consideration.  The  Interpretation  clarifies  which  date  should  be  used  for  translation  when  a  foreign  currency 
transaction involves an advance payment or receipt. The Interpretation is applicable for annual periods beginning 
on  or  after  January  1,  2018.  Earlier  application  is  permitted.  The  Interpretation  clarifies  that  the  date  of  the 
transaction  for  the  purpose  of  determining  the  exchange  rate  to  use  on  initial  recognition  of  the  related  asset, 
expense or income (or part of it) is the date on which an entity initially recognizes the non-monetary asset or non-
monetary liability arising from the payment or receipt of advance consideration.  

Effective for the Company’s annual period beginning January 1, 2018. 

Classification  and  Measurement  of  Share-based  Payment  Transactions  (Amendments  to  IFRS  2  Share-based 
Payment) 

Issued by IASB November 2016 

The amendments provide guidance on the accounting for: 

• 

• 
• 

the  effects  of  vesting  and  non-vesting  conditions  on  the  measurement  of  cash-settled  share-based 
payments; 
share-based payment transactions with a net settlement feature for withholding tax obligations; and 
a modification to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment that changes the classification of the 
transaction from cash-settled to equity-settled. 

Effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2018 

Risks and Uncertainties 

Royalty revenue 

The Company cannot predict future revenues from or operating results of mining activity. Management expects 
future royalty revenues from the Tambor Project to fluctuate depending on the level of future production and the 
price of gold.  The owner of the Tambor Project is not obligated to continue production from the Tambor Project 
and the Company will not be entitled to any compensation if this mining operation does not meet its forecasted 
gold production targets or if the mine operations are discontinued on a temporary or permanent basis. Risks that 
could  negatively  affect  a mine’s  operations include,  but  are  not  limited  to  economics,  lack  of  financial  capital, 
floods,  fire,  mechanical  malfunctions,  social  unrest,  expropriation,  environmental  regulations,  and  legal  and/or 
political changes. The Tambor Project is currently subject to a suspension of operations imposed by the Supreme 
Court of Guatemala. 

Competition 

The  Company  faces  competition  from  other  capital  providers,  all  of  which  compete  with  it  for  investment 
opportunities. These competitors may limit the Company’s opportunities to acquire interests in investments that 
are  attractive  to the  Company.    The  Company  may  be  required  to invest  otherwise  than  in  accordance  with its 

 
 
 
 
 
 
- 25 - 

Investment Policy and strategy in order to meet its investment objectives. If the Company is required to invest 
other than in accordance with its Investment Policy and strategy, its ability to achieve its desired rates of return on 
its investments may be adversely affected. 

Inability to dispose of illiquid securities 

There is a possibility that the Company will be unable to dispose of illiquid securities held in its portfolio and if 
the  Company  is  unable  to  dispose  of  some  or  all  of  its  investments  at  the  appropriate  time,  a  return  on  such 
investment may not be realized. 

Due diligence  

The due diligence process undertaken by the Company in connection with investments that it makes or wishes to 
make  may  not  reveal  all  relevant  facts  in  connection  with  an  investment.    Before  making  investments,  the 
Company will conduct due diligence investigations that it deems reasonable and appropriate based on the facts 
and  circumstances  applicable  to  each  investment.    The  due  diligence  investigations  that  are  carried  out  with 
respect  to  any  investment  opportunity  may  not  reveal  or  highlight  all  relevant  facts  that  may  be  necessary  or 
helpful in evaluating such investment opportunity.  Moreover, such an investigation will not necessarily result in 
the investment being successful. 

Mineral property exploration and mining  

The business of mineral deposit exploration and extraction involves a high degree of risk.  Few properties that are 
explored  ultimately  become  producing  mines.  At  present,  none  of  the  Company’s  properties  has  a  known 
commercial  ore  deposit.  The  main  operating  risks  include:  securing  adequate  funding  to  maintain  and  advance 
exploration  properties;  ensuring  ownership  of  and  access  to  mineral  properties  by  confirmation  that  option 
agreements,  claims  and  leases  are  in  good  standing;  and  obtaining  permits  for  drilling  and  other  exploration 
activities.   

If the Company does not satisfactorily complete its contribution requirements to any joint ventures it may  be a 
party to, the Company’s interest in a joint venture can be diluted to a point where all interest in the joint venture is 
forfeited. 

Joint venture funding  

The  Company’s  strategy  includes  seeking  partners  through  joint  ventures  to  fund  exploration  and  project 
development. The main risk of this strategy is that funding partners may not be able to raise sufficient capital in 
order  to  satisfy  exploration  and  other  expenditure  terms  in  a  particular  joint  venture  agreement.  As  a  result, 
exploration and development of one or more of the Company’s property interests may be delayed depending on 
whether  the  Company  can  find  another  partner  or  has  enough  capital  resources  to  fund  the  exploration  and 
development on its own. 

Commodity price  

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk. Declines in the market price of gold, base metals and other 
minerals may adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital or attract joint venture partners in order to 
fund its ongoing operations. Commodity price declines could also reduce the amount the Company would receive 
on the disposition of one of its mineral properties to a third party. The Company’s royalty revenue is derived from 
a royalty interest that is based on the extraction and sale of gold. Factors beyond the control of the Company may 
affect  the  marketability  of  gold  discovered.  Gold  prices  have  historically  fluctuated  widely.  Consequently,  the 
economic  viability  of  the  Company’s  royalty  interest  cannot  be  accurately  predicted  and  may  be  adversely 
affected by fluctuations in gold prices. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
- 26 - 

Financing and share price fluctuation  

The Company has a limited source of operating cash flow which depends on royalty revenue from a property that 
is subject to suspension of operations and has no assurance that additional funding will be available to it when 
needed  for  further  exploration  and  development  of  its  projects.  Further  exploration  and  development  of  one  or 
more of the Company’s projects may be dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through equity 
or debt financing or other means. Failure to obtain this financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement 
of  further  exploration  and  development  of  its  projects  which  could  result  in  the  loss  of  one  or  more  of  its 
properties.   

Securities  markets  have  at  times  in  the  past  experienced  a  high  degree  of  price  and  volume  volatility,  and  the 
market  price  of  securities  of  many  companies,  particularly  those  considered  to  be  exploration  stage  companies 
such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations in share prices which have not necessarily been related 
to their operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects. There can be no assurance that these kinds of 
share price fluctuations will not occur in the future, and if they do occur, how severe the impact may be on the 
Company’s ability to raise additional funds through equity issues or the value of the Company’s available-for-sale 
investments and corresponding effect on the Company’s financial position.   

Political, regulatory and currency  

The Company’s mineral property interests are located in emerging nations.  Properties in emerging nations may 
be subject to a higher level of risk compared to developed countries. Operations, the status of mineral property 
rights, title to the properties and the recoverability of amounts shown for mineral properties in emerging nations 
can be affected by changing economic, regulatory and political situations. The Company’s equity financings are 
sourced in Canadian dollars but for the most part it incurs its exploration and property maintenance expenditures 
in  US  dollars,  Guatemalan  quetzals,  and  Mexican  pesos.  At  this  time  there  are  no  currency  hedges  in  place.  
Therefore a weakening of the Canadian dollar against the US dollar, Guatemalan quetzal, or Mexican peso could 
have an adverse impact on the amount of exploration conducted. 

Insurance 

In  the  course  of  exploration,  development  and  production  of  mineral  properties,  the  Company  is  subject  to  a 
number of hazards and risks in general, including adverse environmental conditions, operational accidents, labor 
disputes,  unusual  or  unexpected  geological  conditions,  changes  in  the  regulatory  environment  and  natural 
phenomena  such  as  inclement  weather  conditions,  floods,  and  earthquakes.    Such  occurrences  could  result  in 
damage to the Company’s properties or facilities and equipment, personal injury or death, environmental damage 
to properties of the Company or others, delays, monetary losses and possible legal liability. 

Although  the  Company  may  maintain insurance to  protect  against  certain  risks in  such  amounts  as  it  considers 
reasonable, its insurance may not cover all the potential risks associated with its operations. The Company may 
also be unable to maintain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or for other reasons. 
Should such liabilities arise, they could reduce or eliminate future profitability and result in increased costs, have 
a material adverse effect on the Company’s results and a decline in the value of the securities of the Company. 

Environmental and social  

The  activities  of  the  Company  are  subject  to  environmental  regulations  issued  and  enforced  by  government 
agencies. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that will require stricter standards and enforcement 
and  involve  increased  fines  and  penalties  for  non-compliance,  more  stringent  environmental  assessments  of 
proposed  projects,  and  a  heightened  degree  of  responsibility  for  companies  and  their  officers,  directors  and 
employees.  There can be no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely 

 
 
 
 
 
- 27 - 

affect the Company’s operations.  Environmental hazards may exist on properties in which the Company holds 
interests  which  are  unknown  to  the  Company  at  present.  Social  risks  are  fairly  significant  in  some  of  the 
Company’s  areas  of  operations.  Violence,  kidnapping,  theft  and  other  criminal  activities  could  disrupt  supply 
chains and discourage qualified individuals from being involved with the Company's operations. 

 
 
 
- 28 - 

Mineral Properties Expenditure Detail  

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES 
For the year ended December 31, 2017 

USA 

Guatemala 

Mexico 

Other 

General 
Exploration 

Mineral  
Properties 

General  
Exploration 

Mineral  
Properties 

General 
Exploration 

Mineral  
Properties 

General  
Exploration 

Exploration administration 
Field and camp  
Geochemistry 
Geological services 
Legal and accounting 
Licenses, rights and taxes 
Travel and accommodation 

 $        1,028  
- 
230  
11,130  
-  
- 
3,339  

 $           637 
17,603 
84,306  
309,781  
-  
28,308 
36,629  

 $      19,843  
- 
-  
5,540  
2,899  
- 
8,933  

 $      12,919  
- 
-  
-  
700  
- 
-  

$ 3,741  
4,511 
17,078  
121,943  
25,128  
41,938 
34,221  

 $      11,121  
30,431 
17,240  
128,368  
-  
9,747 
70,483  

 $        6,986  
- 
-  
77,668  
-  
- 
1,943  

Total 

 $     56,333  
52,545 
118,854  
654,430  
28,727  
79,993 
155,490  

Expenditures recovered 

-  

-  

-  

-  

 (5,940) 

 - 

-  

 (5,940) 

15,727 

477,264  

37,215  

13,619  

248,560  

267,390  

86,597  

1,146,372  

 $       15,727 

 $    477,264  

 $      37,215  

 $      13,619  

 $    242,620  

 $    267,390  

 $      86,597  

 $  1,140,432  

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF EXPLORATION EXPENDITURES 
For the year ended December 31, 2016 

USA 

Guatemala 

Mexico 

Exploration administration 
Geochemistry 
Geological services 
Legal and accounting 
Licenses, rights and taxes 
Travel and accommodation 

General 

Mineral  
Exploration  Concessions 

 $        3,572  

 $              96  
3,301                6,959  
68,029              55,290  
-  
-  
-              35,797  
12,773                8,643  

General  

Mineral  
Exploration  Concessions  Exploration  Concessions 

Mineral  

General 

 $       23,497  
                     -  
           24,076  
             2,036  
                526  
             5,882  

 $        8,632  
-  
3,457  
570  
849  
-  

 $        1,950  

 $                 -  
15,182                        -  
102,689                   541  
11,311                        -  
739              11,647  
29,011                        -  

Other 

General  
Exploration 

 $         8,732  
             2,606  
         119,182  
                998  
                     -  
             8,878  

Total 

 $      46,479  
28,048  
373,264  
14,915  
49,558  
65,187  

Expenditures recovered 

-  

-  

                     -  

-  

 (32,865)                       -  

                     -  

 (32,865) 

87,675            106,785  

           56,017  

13,508  

160,882              12,188  

         140,396  

577,451  

 $      87,675  

 $     106,785  

 $       56,017  

 $      13,508  

 $    128,017  

 $       12,188  

 $     140,396  

 $    544,586