Richardson Electronics
Annual Report 2018

Plain-text annual report

w UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from__________ to Commission File Number: 0-12906 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 36-2096643 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 40W267 Keslinger Road, P.O. Box 393, LaFox, Illinois 60147-0393 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (630) 208-2200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange of which registered Common stock, $0.05 Par Value NASDAQ Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ☐ Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Non-Accelerated Filer Emerging growth company ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Accelerated Filer Smaller reporting company ☒ ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ! Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 2, 2017 was approximately $71.2 million. As of July 23, 2018, there were outstanding 10,806,069 shares of Common Stock, $0.05 par value and 2,136,919 shares of Class B Common Stock, $0.05 par value, which are convertible into Common Stock of the registrant on a one-for-one basis. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held October 9, 2018, which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report. Except as specifically incorporated herein by reference, the abovementioned Proxy Statement is not deemed filed as part of this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Controls and Procedures Other Information Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accountant Fees and Services Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules Part I Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Part II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9A. Item 9B. Part III Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Part IV Item 15. Signatures Exhibit Index Page 3 7 12 13 14 15 17 18 32 33 62 63 64 64 64 64 64 65 66 67 2 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements in this report may constitute “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The terms “may”, “should”, “could”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continues”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “objective”, “plan”, “potential”, “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, intentions or beliefs and are subject to a number of factors, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences or that might otherwise impact the business include the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update any such factor or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In addition, while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against our policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility. PART I ITEM 1. Business General Richardson Electronics, Ltd. is a leading global provider of engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tubes and related consumables; power conversion and RF and microwave components; high value flat panel detector solutions, replacement parts, tubes and service training for diagnostic imaging equipment; and customized display solutions. We serve customers in the alternative energy, healthcare, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. The Company’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and “engineered solutions” based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. The Company provides solutions and adds value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics, and aftermarket technical service and repair through its global infrastructure. Our products include electron tubes and related components, microwave generators, subsystems used in semiconductor manufacturing, and visual technology solutions. These products are used to control, switch or amplify electrical power signals, or are used as display devices in a variety of industrial, commercial, medical, and communication applications. Our fiscal year 2018 began on May 28, 2017 and ended on June 2, 2018, our fiscal year 2017 began on May 29, 2016 and ended on May 27, 2017 and our fiscal year 2016 began on May 31, 2015 and ended on May 28, 2016. Unless otherwise noted, all references to a particular year in this document shall mean our fiscal year. 3  Geography We currently have operations in the following major geographic regions: North America, Asia/Pacific, Europe and Latin America. Selected financial data attributable to each segment and geographic region for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 is set forth in Note 11 “Segment and Geographic Information” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have three operating and reportable segments, which we define as follows: Power and Microwave Technologies Group Power and Microwave Technologies Group (“PMT”) combines our core engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube business with new RF and power technologies. As a manufacturer and authorized distributor, PMT’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and engineered solutions based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. We provide solutions and add value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics and aftermarket technical service and repair—all through our existing global infrastructure. PMT’s focus is on products for power, RF and microwave applications for customers in alternative energy, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. PMT focuses on various applications including broadcast transmission, CO2 laser cutting, diagnostic imaging, dielectric and induction heating, high energy transfer, high voltage switching, plasma, power conversion, radar and radiation oncology. PMT also offers its customers technical services for both microwave and industrial equipment. PMT represents leading manufacturers of electron tubes and solid-state components used in semiconductor manufacturing equipment, RF and wireless and industrial power applications. Among the suppliers they support are Amperex, CDE, CPI, Draloric, Eimac, General Electric, Hitachi, Jennings, L3, MACOM, National, NJRC, Ohmite, Qorvo, Thales, Toshiba and Vishay. PMT’s inventory levels reflect our commitment to maintain an inventory of a broad range of products for customers who are buying products for replacement of components used in critical equipment and new technologies. PMT also sells a number of products representing trailing edge technology. While the market for these trailing edge technology products is declining, PMT is increasing its market share. PMT often buys products it knows it can sell ahead of any supplier price increases. As manufacturers for these products exit the business, PMT has the option to purchase a substantial portion of their remaining inventory. PMT has distribution agreements with many of its suppliers; most of these agreements provide exclusive distribution rights which often include global coverage. The agreements are typically long term, and usually contain provisions permitting termination by either party if there are significant breaches which are not cured within a reasonable period of time. Although some of these agreements allow PMT to return inventory periodically, others do not, in which case PMT may have obsolete inventory that they cannot return to the supplier. PMT’s suppliers provide warranty coverage for the products and allow return of defective products, including those returned to PMT by its customers. For information regarding the warranty reserves, see Note 3 “Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to third party products, we sell proprietary products principally under certain trade names we own including: Amperex®, Cetron® and National®. Our proprietary products include thyratrons and rectifiers, power tubes, ignitrons, magnetrons, phototubes, microwave generators and liquid crystal display monitors. The materials used in the manufacturing process consist of glass bulbs and tubing, nickel, stainless steel and other metals, plastic and metal bases, ceramics and a wide variety of fabricated metal components. These materials are generally readily available, but some components may require long lead times for production, and some materials are subject to shortages or price fluctuations based on supply and demand. 4  Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions Canvys provides customized display solutions serving the corporate enterprise, financial, healthcare, industrial and medical original equipment manufacturers markets. Our engineers design, manufacture, source and support a full spectrum of solutions to match the needs of our customers. We offer long term availability and proven custom display solutions that include touch screens, protective panels, custom enclosures, all-in-ones, specialized cabinet finishes and application specific software packages and certification services. Our volume commitments are lower than those of the large display manufacturers, making us the ideal choice for companies with very specific design requirements. We partner with both private label manufacturing companies and leading branded hardware vendors to offer the highest quality display and touch solutions and customized computing platforms. We have long-standing relationships with key component and finished goods manufacturers and several key ISO 9001 and ISO 13485 certified Asian display manufacturers that manufacture products to our specifications. We believe supplier relationships, combined with our engineering design and manufacturing capabilities and private label partnerships, allow us to maintain a well- balanced and technologically advanced offering of customer specific display solutions. Healthcare Healthcare manufactures, refurbishes and distributes high value replacement parts for the healthcare market including hospitals, medical centers, asset management companies, independent service organizations and multi-vendor service providers. Products include Diagnostic Imaging replacement parts for CT and MRI systems; replacement CT and MRI tubes; CT service training; MRI coils, cold heads and RF amplifiers; hydrogen thyratrons, klystrons, magnetrons; flat panel detector upgrades; and additional replacement solutions currently under development for the diagnostic imaging service market. Through a combination of newly developed products and partnerships, service offerings and training programs, we believe we can help our customers improve efficiency and deliver better clinical outcomes while lowering the cost of healthcare delivery. Sales and Product Management We have employees, as well as authorized representatives, who are not our employees, selling our products primarily in regions where we do not have a direct sales presence. We offer various credit terms to qualifying customers as well as cash in advance and credit card terms. We establish credit limits for each customer and routinely review delinquent and aging accounts. Distribution We maintain approximately 110,700 part numbers in our product inventory database and we estimate that more than 90% of orders received by 6:00 p.m. local time are shipped complete the same day for stock product. Customers can access our products on our web sites, www.rell.com, www.rellhealthcare.com, www.canvys.com, www.rellpower.com and www.rellaser.com, through electronic data interchange, or by telephone. Customer orders are processed by our regional sales offices and supported primarily by one of our distribution facilities in LaFox, Illinois; Fort Mill, South Carolina; Amsterdam, Netherlands; Marlborough, Massachusetts; Donaueschingen, Germany; or Singapore, Singapore. We also have satellite warehouses in Sao Paulo, Brazil; Shanghai, China; Bangkok, Thailand; and Hook, United Kingdom. Our data processing network provides on-line, real-time interconnection of all sales offices and central distribution operations, 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Information on stock availability, pricing in local currency, cross-reference information, customers and market analyses are obtainable throughout the entire distribution network. 5 International Sales During fiscal 2018, we made approximately 59% of our sales outside the U.S. We continue to pursue new international sales to further expand our geographic reach. Major Customers During fiscal 2018, LAM Research Corporation individually accounted for 11 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018. No one customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016. The Company believes that the loss of this customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. See Note 11 “Segment and Geographic Information” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. Employees As of June 2, 2018, we employed 421 individuals. All of our employees are non-union and we consider our relationships with our employees to be good. Website Access to SEC Reports We maintain an Internet website at www.rell.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 are accessible through our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Interactive Data Files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, of these filing dates, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”) are accessible as well. To access these reports, go to our website at www.rell.com. The foregoing information regarding our website is provided for convenience and the content of our website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in this report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 6  ITEM 1A. Risk Factors Investors should consider carefully the following risk factors in addition to the other information included and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that we believe are applicable to our businesses and the industries in which we operate. While we believe we have identified the key risk factors affecting our businesses, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that may adversely affect our results of operations. A significant portion of our cash, cash equivalents and investments are held by our foreign subsidiaries and could affect future liquidity needs. As of June 2, 2018, $34.6 million, or approximately 57% of our cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Some of these subsidiaries are located in jurisdictions that require foreign government approval before a cash repatriation can occur. In addition, under current tax law, repatriation of this cash may trigger significant adverse tax consequences in the U.S. Our liquidity requirements could necessitate transfers of existing cash balances between our subsidiaries or to the United States. While we intend to use some of the cash held outside the United States to fund our international operations and growth, when we encounter a significant need for liquidity domestically or at a particular location that we cannot fulfill through other internal or external sources, we may experience unfavorable tax, earnings and liquidity consequences due to cash transfers. These adverse consequences would occur, for example, if the transfer of cash into the United Sates is taxed and no offsetting foreign tax credit or net operating loss carryforward is available to offset the U.S. tax liability, resulting in lower earnings and liquidity. We may not achieve our plan for sales growth and margin targets. We have established both margin and expense targets to grow our sales with new and existing customers. If we do not achieve our growth objectives, the complexity of our global infrastructure makes it difficult to leverage our fixed cost structure to align with the size of our operations. Factors that could have a significant effect on our ability to achieve these goals include the following: • Failure to achieve our sales and margin growth objectives in our product lines and business units; • • • Failure to identify, consummate and successfully integrate acquisitions; Declining gross margin reflecting competitive pricing pressures or product mix; and, Limitations on our ability to leverage our support-function cost structure while maintaining an adequate structure to achieve our growth objectives. We have historically incurred significant charges for inventory obsolescence, and may incur similar charges in the future. We maintain significant inventories in an effort to ensure that customers have a reliable source of supply. Our products generally support industrial machinery powered by tube technology. As technology evolves and companies replace this capital equipment, the market for our products potentially declines. In addition, the market for many of our other products changes rapidly resulting from the development of new technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions by some of our suppliers and changing end-user demand, which can contribute to the decline in value or obsolescence of our inventory. We do not have many long-term supply contracts with our customers. If we fail to anticipate the changing needs of our customers or we do not accurately forecast customer demand, our customers may not place orders with us, and we may accumulate significant inventories of products that we may be unable to sell or return to our vendors. This may result in a decline in the value of our inventory. We face competitive pressures that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our overall competitive position depends on a number of factors including price, engineering capability, vendor representation, product diversity, lead times and the level of customer service. There are very few vacuum tube competitors in the markets we serve. There are also a limited number of Chinese manufacturers whose ability to produce vacuum tubes has progressed over the past several years. The most significant competitive risk comes from technical obsolescence. Canvys faces many competitors in the markets we serve. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins, or a loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. As we expand our business and pursue our growth initiatives, we may encounter increased competition from current and/or new competitors. Our failure to maintain and enhance our competitive position could have a material adverse effect on our business. 7 A single stockholder has voting control over us. As of July 23, 2018, Edward J. Richardson, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, beneficially owned approximately 99% of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, representing approximately 66% of the voting power of the outstanding common stock. This share ownership permits Mr. Richardson to exert control over the outcome of stockholder votes, including votes concerning the election of directors, by-law amendments, possible mergers, corporate control contests, and other significant corporate transactions. We are dependent on a limited number of vendors to supply us with essential products. Our principal products are capacitors, vacuum tubes and related products, microwave generators and high voltage power supplies. The products we supply are currently produced by a relatively small number of manufacturers. One of our suppliers represented 15 percent of our total cost of sales. Our success depends, in large part, on maintaining current vendor relationships and developing new relationships. To the extent that our significant suppliers are unwilling or unable to continue to do business with us, extend lead times, limit supplies due to capacity constraints, or other factors, there could be a material adverse effect on our business. International operations represent a significant percentage of our business and present a variety of risks that could impact our results. Because we source and sell our products worldwide, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. These risks include the costs and difficulties of managing foreign entities, limitations on the repatriation and investment of funds, cultural differences that affect customer preferences and business practices, unstable political or economic conditions, trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements, and changes in tax laws. We also face exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates because we conduct business outside of the United States. Price increases caused by currency exchange rate fluctuations may make our products less competitive or may have an adverse effect on our margins. Our international revenues and expenses generally are derived from sales and operations in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, when the U.S. dollar strengthens in relation to the base currencies of the countries in which we sell our products, our U.S. dollar reported net revenue and income would decrease. We currently do not engage in any currency hedging transactions. We cannot predict whether foreign currency exchange risks inherent in doing business in foreign countries will have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results in the future. We may need to raise additional funds through debt or equity financings in the future to fund our domestic operations and our broader corporate initiatives, which would dilute the ownership of our existing shareholders. If the cash generated by our domestic operations is not sufficient to fund our domestic operations and our broader corporate initiatives, such as stock repurchases, dividends, acquisitions, and other strategic opportunities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financings, or we may need to obtain new credit facilities to the extent we are unable to, or choose not to, repatriate our overseas cash. Such additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all, and any new equity financings or offerings would dilute our current stockholders’ ownership interests in us. Furthermore, lenders may not agree to extend us new, additional or continuing credit. In any such case, our business, operating results or financial condition could be adversely impacted. A withdrawal by the United Kingdom from the European Union could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, liquidity and results of operations In a non-binding referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership in the European Union (“EU”) in June 2016, a majority of those who voted approved the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EU. Any withdrawal by the United Kingdom from the EU (“Brexit”) would occur after, or possible concurrently with, a process of negotiation regarding the future terms of the United Kingdom’s relationship with the EU, which could result in the United Kingdom losing access to certain aspects of the single EU market and the global trade deals negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members. The Brexit vote and the perceptions as to the impact of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom may adversely affect business activity, political stability and economic conditions in the United Kingdom, the EU and elsewhere. Any of these developments, or the perception that any of these developments are likely to occur, could have a material adverse effect on economic growth or business activity in the United Kingdom, the Eurozone, or the EU, and could result in the relocation of businesses, cause business interruptions, lead to economic recession or depression, and impact the stability of the financial markets, availability of credit, political systems or financial institutions and the financial and monetary system. Given that we conduct a substantial portion of our business in the EU, these developments could have a material adverse 8 effect on our business, financial position, liquidity and results of operations. The uncertainty concerning the timing and terms of the exit could also have a negative impact on the growth of the European economy and cause greater volatility in all of the global currencies that we currently use to transact business. We rely heavily on information technology systems that, if not properly functioning, could materially adversely affect our business. We rely on our information technology systems to process, analyze, and manage data to facilitate the purchase, manufacture, and distribution of our products, as well as to receive, process, bill, and ship orders on a timely basis. A significant disruption or failure in the design, operation, security or support of our information technology systems could significantly disrupt our business. Our information technology systems may be subject to cyber attacks, security breaches or computer hacking. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our security controls and misappropriate or compromise sensitive personal, proprietary or confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. They also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that attack our systems or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities. Our systems and the data stored on those systems may also be vulnerable to security incidents or security attacks, acts of vandalism or theft, coordinated attacks by activist entities, misplaced or lost data, human errors, or other similar events that could negatively affect our systems and its data, as well as the data of our business partners. Further, third parties, such as hosted solution providers, that provide services to us, could also be a source of security risk in the event of a failure of their own security systems and infrastructure. The costs to mitigate or address security threats and vulnerabilities before or after a cyber incident could be significant. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays or cessation of service, and loss of existing or potential suppliers or customers. In addition, breaches of our security measures and the unauthorized dissemination of sensitive personal, proprietary or confidential information about us, our business partners or other third parties could expose us to significant potential liability and reputational harm. As threats related to cyber attacks develop and grow, we may also find it necessary to make further investments to protect our data and infrastructure, which may impact our profitability. As a global enterprise, we could also be negatively impacted by existing and proposed laws and regulations, as well as government policies and practices related to cybersecurity, privacy, data localization and data protection. Our products may be found to be defective or our services performed may result in equipment or product damage and, as a result, warranty and/or product liability claims may be asserted against us. We sell many of our components at prices that are significantly lower than the cost of the equipment or other goods in which they are incorporated. Since a defect or failure in a product could give rise to failures in the equipment that incorporates them, we may face claims for damages that are disproportionate to the revenues and profits we receive from the components involved in the claims. While we typically have provisions in our agreements with our suppliers that hold the supplier accountable for defective products, and we and our suppliers generally exclude consequential damages in our standard terms and conditions, our ability to avoid such liabilities may be limited as a result of various factors, including the inability to exclude such damages due to the laws of some of the countries where we do business. Our business could be adversely affected as a result of a significant quality or performance issues in the components sold by us if we are required to pay for the damages. Although we have product liability insurance, such insurance is limited in coverage and amount. Substantial defaults by our customers on our accounts receivable or the loss of significant customers could have a significant negative impact on our business. We extend credit to our customers. The failure of a significant customer or a significant group of customers to timely pay all amounts due could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The extension of credit involves considerable judgment and is based on management’s evaluation of factors that include such things as a customer’s financial condition, payment history, and the availability of collateral to secure customers’ receivables. 9 Failure to successfully implement our growth initiatives, or failure to realize the benefits expected from these initiatives if implemented, may create ongoing operating losses or otherwise adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Our growth strategy focuses on expanding our healthcare and our power conversion businesses. On June 15, 2015, we acquired certain assets, including inventory, receivables, fixed assets, and certain other assets, of International Medical Equipment and Services, Inc. (“IMES”), for a purchase price of $12.2 million. In July 2015, we launched Power and Microwave Technologies Group (“PMT”), which combines our core engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube business with new RF and power technologies. We may be unable to implement our growth initiatives or reach profitability in the near future or at all, due to many factors, including factors outside of our control. If our investments in these growth initiatives do not yield anticipated returns for any reason, our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected. We may not be successful in identifying, consummating and integrating future acquisitions. As part of our growth strategy, our intent is to acquire additional businesses or assets. We may not be able to identify attractive acquisition candidates or complete the acquisition of identified candidates at favorable prices and upon advantageous terms. Also, acquisitions are accompanied by risks, such as potential exposure to unknown liabilities and the possible loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business. In addition, we may not obtain the expected benefits or cost savings from acquisitions. Acquisitions are subject to risks associated with financing the acquisition, and integrating the operations, personnel and systems of the acquired businesses. If any of these risks materialize, they may result in disruptions to our business and the diversion of management time and attention, which could increase the costs of operating our existing or acquired businesses or negate the expected benefits of the acquisitions. Economic weakness and uncertainty could adversely affect our revenues and gross margins. Our revenues and gross profit margins depend significantly on global economic conditions, the demand for our products and services and the financial condition of our customers. Economic weakness and uncertainty have in the past, and may in the future, result in decreased revenues and gross profit margins. Economic uncertainty also makes it more difficult for us to forecast overall supply and demand with a great deal of confidence. Our operating results during fiscal 2017 reflect a net loss, while we are reporting net income for fiscal 2018. There can be no assurance that we will continue recovery in the near future; nor is there any assurance that such worldwide economic volatility experienced recently will not continue. Major disruptions to our logistics capability could have a material adverse impact on our operations. We operate our global logistics services through specialized and centralized distribution centers. We depend on third party transportation service providers for the delivery of products to our customers. A major interruption or disruption in service at any of our distribution centers for any reason (such as natural disasters, pandemics, or significant disruptions of services from our third party providers) could cause cancellations or delays in a significant number of shipments to customers and, as a result, could have a severe impact on our business, operations and financial performance. We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require payment of damages or licensing fees, and/or could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future. Substantial litigation and threats of litigation regarding intellectual property rights exist in the display systems and electronics industries. From time to time, third parties, including certain companies in the business of acquiring patents with the intention of aggressively seeking licensing revenue from purported infringers, may assert patent and/or other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to our business. In any dispute involving products that we have sold, our customers could also become the target of litigation. We are obligated in many instances to indemnify and defend our customers if the products we sell are alleged to infringe any third party’s intellectual property rights. In some cases, depending on the nature of the claim, we may be able to seek indemnification from our suppliers for our self and our customers against such claims, but there is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such indemnification or that we are fully protected against such claims. Any infringement claim brought against us, regardless of the duration, outcome or size of damage award, could result in substantial cost, divert our management’s attention, be time consuming to defend, result in significant damage awards, cause product shipment delays, or require us to enter into royalty or other licensing agreements. 10 Additionally, if an infringement claim is successful we may be required to pay damages or seek royalty or license arrangements which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. The payment of any such damages or royalties may significantly increase our operating expenses and harm our operating results and financial condition. Also, royalty or license arrangements may not be available at all. We may have to stop selling certain products or certain technologies, which could affect our ability to compete effectively. Potential lawsuits, with or without merit, may divert management’s attention, and we may incur significant expenses in our defense. In addition, we may be required to pay damage awards or settlements, become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, or determine to abandon certain lines of business, that may cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, we may not be able to detect fraud or report our financial results accurately or timely. An effective internal control environment is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and is an important part of our effort to prevent financial fraud. We are required to periodically evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Based on these evaluations, we may conclude that enhancements, modifications, or changes to internal controls are necessary or desirable. While management evaluates the effectiveness of our internal controls on a regular basis, these controls may not always be effective. There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls, including fraud, collusion, management override, and failure in human judgment. In addition, control procedures are designed to reduce rather than eliminate business risks. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, or if management or our independent registered public accounting firm discovers material weaknesses in our internal controls, we may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud. In addition, we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or NASDAQ. Any such actions could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. If we are deemed to be an investment company, we will be required to meet burdensome compliance requirements and restrictions on our activities. We currently have significant cash and investments. If we are deemed to be an “investment company” as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”), the nature of our investments may be subject to various restrictions. We do not believe that our principal activities subject us to the Investment Company Act. If we are deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with required additional regulatory burdens would increase our operating expenses. The company’s goodwill and identifiable intangible assets could become impaired, which could reduce the value of our assets and reduce our net income in the year in which the write-off occurs. Our goodwill and intangible assets could become impaired, which could reduce the value of our assets and reduce our net income in the year in which the write-off occurs. We ascribe value to certain intangible assets, which consist of customer lists and trade names resulting from acquisitions. We may incur an impairment charge on goodwill or on intangible assets if we determine that the fair value of the intangible assets are less than their current carrying values. We evaluate whether events have occurred that indicate all, or a portion, of the carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets may no longer be recoverable. If this is the case, an impairment charge to earnings would be necessary. 11 We may incur substantial operational costs or be required to change our business practices to comply with the recently adopted General Data Protection Regulation. The EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) which went into effect in May 2018. The GDPR includes operational requirements for companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the European Union, including more robust documentation requirements for data protection compliance programs. Specifically, the GDPR introduced numerous privacy- related changes for companies operating in the EU, including greater control for data subjects, increased data portability for EU consumers, and data breach notification requirements. Although GDPR has already gone into effect, there is still considerable uncertainty as to how to interpret and implement many of its provisions. Complying with the GDPR may cause us to incur substantial operational costs or require us to change our business practices in ways that we cannot currently predict. Despite our efforts to bring our practices into compliance with the GDPR, we may not be successful. Non-compliance could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities, customers, data subjects or others. Fines of up to 20 million euros or up to 4% of the annual global revenue of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater, may be imposed for violations of certain of the GDPR’s requirements. New tariffs and the evolving trade policy dispute between the United States and China may adversely affect our business. On August 14, 2017, President Trump instructed the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) to determine under Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974 (the “Trade Act”) whether to investigate China’s law, policies, practices or actions that may be unreasonable or discriminatory and that may be harming American intellectual property rights, innovation or technology development. On March 22, 2018, based upon the results of its investigation, the USTR published a report finding that the acts, policies and practices of the Chinese government are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce. On March 8, 2018, President Trump imposed significant tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from a number of countries, including China. Subsequently, the USTR announced an initial proposed list of 1,300 goods imported from China that could be subject to additional tariffs and initiated a dispute with the World Trade Organization against China for alleged unfair trade practices. On June 15, 2018, the USTR announced a list of products subject to additional tariffs. The list focused on products from industrial sectors that contribute to or benefit from the “Made in China 2025” industrial policy. The list of products consists of two sets of tariff lines. The first set contains 818 tariff lines for which Customs and Border Protection will begin collecting the additional duties on July 6, 2018. This list includes some of our products. The second set contains 284 proposed tariff lines that remain subject to further review. These new tariffs and the evolving trade policy dispute between the United States and China may have a significant impact on the industries in which we participate. A "trade war" between the United States and China or other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements or policies has the potential to adversely impact demand for our products, our costs, customers, suppliers and/or the United States economy or certain sectors thereof and, thus, to adversely impact our businesses and results of operations. ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. 12  ITEM 2. Properties The Company owns one facility and leases 27 facilities. We own our corporate facility and largest distribution center, which is located on approximately 100 acres in LaFox, Illinois and consists of approximately 242,000 square feet of manufacturing, warehouse and office space. We maintain geographically diverse facilities because we believe this provides value to our customers and suppliers, and limits market risk and exchange rate exposure. We believe our properties are well maintained and adequate for our present needs. The extent of utilization varies from property to property and from time to time during the year. Our facility locations, their primary use, and segments served are as follows: Location Woodland Hills, California Fort Lauderdale, Florida LaFox, Illinois * Marlborough, Massachusetts Fort Mill, South Carolina Sao Paulo, Brazil Beijing, China Shanghai, China Shenzhen, China Brive, France Nanterre, France Donaueschingen, Germany Puchheim, Germany Mumbai, India Ramat Gan, Israel Florence, Italy ** Milan, Italy Tokyo, Japan Mexico City, Mexico Amsterdam, Netherlands Singapore, Singapore Seoul, South Korea Madrid, Spain Taipei, Taiwan Bangkok, Thailand Dubai, United Arab Emirates Hook, United Kingdom Lincoln, United Kingdom Leased/Owned Leased Leased Owned Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Leased Use Sales Sales Corporate/Sales/Distribution/Manufacturing Sales/Distribution/Manufacturing Sales/Distribution/Testing/Repair Sales/Distribution Sales Sales/Distribution Sales Manufacturing Support/Testing Sales Sales/Distribution/Manufacturing Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales Sales/Distribution/Manufacturing Sales/Distribution Sales Sales Sales Sales/Distribution Sales/Distribution/Testing/Repair Sales/Distribution/Testing/Repair Sales Segment PMT PMT PMT/Canvys/Healthcare Canvys Healthcare PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT Canvys PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT PMT/Healthcare PMT PMT PMT PMT/Canvys PMT PMT PMT PMT/Canvys * ** LaFox, Illinois is also the location of our corporate headquarters. Sold building June 12, 2017, currently lease separate facility. 13  ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings On December 5, 2017, Steven H. Busch filed a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint against Edward J. Richardson, Paul Plante, Jacques Belin, James Benham, Kenneth Halverson, and the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery, captioned Steven H. Busch v. Edward J. Richardson, et al., C.A. No. 2017-0868-AGB. The lawsuit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors and challenges the decision of a special committee of the Company’s Board to refuse Mr. Busch’s demand that the Company’s Board, among other things, rescind the Company’s May 2013 repurchase of stock from Mr. Richardson and May 2013 and October 2014 repurchases of Company stock from the Richardson Wildlife Foundation. On March 9, 2018, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit; these motions are currently pending. The Company believes the lawsuit to be without merit and that a loss is not probable or estimable based on the information available at the time the financial statements were issued. 14 ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities PART II Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities None. Share Repurchases There were no share repurchases in fiscal 2018. Dividends Our quarterly dividend was $0.06 per common share and $0.054 per Class B common share. Annual dividend payments for both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were approximately $3.0 million. All future payments of dividends are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Dividend payments will depend on earnings, capital requirements, operating conditions and such other factors that the Board may deem relevant. Common Stock Information Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the trading symbol (“RELL”). There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock. As of July 23, 2018, there were approximately 547 stockholders of record for the common stock and approximately 15 stockholders of record for the Class B common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales price per share of RELL common stock as reported on the NASDAQ for the periods indicated. High and Low Closing Prices of Common Stock Fiscal Quarter First Second Third Fourth 2018 2017 High Low High Low $ $ $ $ 6.09 $ 6.75 $ 8.21 $ 9.74 $ 5.54 $ 5.42 $ 6.27 $ 7.66 $ 6.90 $ 7.05 $ 6.45 $ 6.25 $ 5.17 5.94 5.61 5.62 15 Performance Graph The following graph compares the performance of our common stock for the periods indicated with the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index and NASDAQ Electronic Components Index. The graph assumes $100 invested on the last day of our fiscal year 2013, in our common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and NASDAQ Electronic Components Index. Total return indices reflect reinvestment of dividends at the closing stock prices at the date of the dividend declaration. COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Richardson Electronics, Ltd., the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Electronic Components Index $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 6/1/13 5/31/14 5/30/15 5/28/16 5/27/17 6/2/18 Richardson Electronics, Ltd. NASDAQ Composite NASDAQ Electronic Components *$100 invested on 6/1/13 in stock or 5/31/13 in index, including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes calculated on month-end basis. 16  ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data Five-Year Financial Review This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere herein. Fiscal Year Ended (1) (in thousands, except per share amounts ) May 30, May 28, May 27, 2015 2016 2017 May 31, 2014 June 2, 2018 $ 163,212 $ 136,872 $ 142,016 $ 136,957 $ 137,960 3,860 1,534 2,326 $ (6,116 ) 812 (6,928 ) $ (6,220 ) $ 546 (6,766 ) $ (6,994 ) $ (1,466 ) (5,528 ) $ 1,496 3,822 $ — (6,928 ) $ — $ (6,766 ) $ (31 ) $ (5,559 ) $ (652 ) (307 ) (345 ) (170 ) (515 ) $ $ Statements of Income (Loss) Net sales Continuing Operations Income (loss) from continuing operations before tax Income tax provision (benefit) Income (loss) from continuing operations Discontinued Operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Per Share Data Net income (loss) per Common share - Basic: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 0.18 $ 0.12 (0.55 ) $ — (0.53 ) $ — (0.41 ) $ — (0.03 ) (0.01 ) Total net income (loss) per Common share - Basic: $ 0.30 $ (0.55 ) $ (0.53 ) $ (0.41 ) $ (0.04 ) Net income (loss) per Class B common share - Basic: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 0.16 $ 0.11 (0.49 ) $ — (0.47 ) $ — (0.36 ) $ — (0.02 ) (0.01 ) Total net income (loss) per Class B common share - Basic: $ 0.27 $ (0.49 ) $ (0.47 ) $ (0.36 ) $ (0.03 ) Net income (loss) per Common share - Diluted: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 0.18 $ 0.12 (0.55 ) $ — (0.53 ) $ — (0.41 ) $ — (0.03 ) (0.01 ) Total net income (loss) per Common share - Diluted: $ 0.30 $ (0.55 ) $ (0.53 ) $ (0.41 ) $ (0.04 ) Net income (loss) per Class B common share - Diluted: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations $ 0.16 $ 0.11 (0.49 ) $ — (0.47 ) $ — (0.36 ) $ — (0.02 ) (0.01 ) Total net income (loss) per Class B common share - Diluted: Cash Dividend Data Dividends per common share Dividends per Class B common share (2) Balance Sheet Data Total assets Stockholders’ equity $ 0.27 $ (0.49 ) $ (0.47 ) $ (0.36 ) $ (0.03 ) $ $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ 0.22 $ 0.24 0.22 $ 166,329 $ 157,464 $ 168,130 $ 184,994 $ 203,545 $ 135,181 $ 132,327 $ 141,675 $ 156,652 $ 174,845 (1) Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the end of May. Each of the fiscal years presented contain 52/53 weeks. (2) The dividend per Class B common share is 90% of the dividend per Class A common share. 17  ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to assist the reader in better understanding our business, results of operations, financial condition, changes in financial condition, critical accounting policies and estimates and significant developments. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this filing. This section is organized as follows: • • • Business Overview Results of Operations - an analysis and comparison of our consolidated results of operations for the fiscal years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, as reflected in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Liquidity, Financial Position, and Capital Resources - a discussion of our primary sources and uses of cash for the fiscal years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, and a discussion of changes in our financial position. Business Overview Richardson Electronics, Ltd. is a leading global provider of engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tubes and related consumables; power conversion and RF and microwave components; high value flat panel detector solutions, replacement parts, tubes and service training for diagnostic imaging equipment; and customized display solutions. We serve customers in the alternative energy, healthcare, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. The Company’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and “engineered solutions” based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. The Company provides solutions and adds value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics, and aftermarket technical service and repair through its global infrastructure. Our products include electron tubes and related components, microwave generators, subsystems used in semiconductor manufacturing, and visual technology solutions. These products are used to control, switch or amplify electrical power signals, or are used as display devices in a variety of industrial, commercial, medical, and communication applications. On June 15, 2015, Richardson Electronics, Ltd (“the Company”) acquired certain assets of International Medical Equipment and Services, Inc. (“IMES”) for a purchase price of $12.2 million. This included the purchase of inventory, receivables, fixed assets, and certain other assets of the Company. The Company did not acquire any liabilities of IMES. The total consideration paid excludes transaction costs. IMES, based in South Carolina, provides reliable, cost-saving solutions worldwide for major brands of CT and MRI equipment. This acquisition positions Richardson Healthcare to provide cost effective diagnostic imaging replacement parts and training to hospitals, diagnostic imaging centers, medical institutions and independent service organizations. IMES offers an extensive selection of replacement parts, as well as an interactive training center, on-site test bays and experienced technicians who provide 24/7 customer support. Replacement parts are readily available and triple tested to provide peace of mind when uptime is critical. IMES core operations have remained in South Carolina. Richardson Healthcare plans to expand IMES’ replacement parts and training offerings geographically leveraging the Company’s global infrastructure. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, IMES opened up their first foreign location in Amsterdam. 18 We have three operating and reportable segments, which we define as follows: Power and Microwave Technologies Group (“PMT”) combines our core engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube business with new RF and power technologies. As a manufacturer and authorized distributor, PMT’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and engineered solutions based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. We provide solutions and add value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics and aftermarket technical service and repair—all through our existing global infrastructure. PMT’s focus is on products for power, RF and microwave applications for customers in alternative energy, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. PMT focuses on various applications including broadcast transmission, CO2 laser cutting, diagnostic imaging, dielectric and induction heating, high energy transfer, high voltage switching, plasma, power conversion, radar and radiation oncology. PMT also offers its customers technical services for both microwave and industrial equipment. Canvys provides customized display solutions serving the corporate enterprise, financial, healthcare, industrial and medical original equipment manufacturers markets. Our engineers design, manufacture, source and support a full spectrum of solutions to match the needs of our customers. We offer long term availability and proven custom display solutions that include touch screens, protective panels, custom enclosures, all-in-ones, specialized cabinet finishes and application specific software packages and certification services. Our volume commitments are lower than the large display manufacturers, making us the ideal choice for companies with very specific design requirements. We partner with both private label manufacturing companies and leading branded hardware vendors to offer the highest quality display and touch solutions and customized computing platforms. Healthcare manufactures, refurbishes and distributes high value replacement parts for the healthcare market including hospitals, medical centers, asset management companies, independent service organizations and multi-vendor service providers. Products include Diagnostic Imaging replacement parts for CT and MRI systems; replacement CT and MRI tubes; CT service training; MRI coils, cold heads and RF amplifiers; hydrogen thyratrons, klystrons, magnetrons; flat panel detector upgrades; and additional replacement solutions currently under development for the diagnostic imaging service market. Through a combination of newly developed products and partnerships, service offerings and training programs, we believe we can help our customers improve efficiency and deliver better clinical outcomes while lowering the cost of healthcare delivery. We currently have operations in the following geographic regions: North America, Asia/Pacific, Europe and Latin America. 19  Results of Operations Overview - Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 • • • • • • • • • Fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 contained 53 and 52 weeks, respectively. Net sales for fiscal 2018 were $163.2 million, up 19.2%, compared to net sales of $136.9 million during fiscal 2017. Gross margin was 33.7% of net sales for fiscal 2018, compared to 32.1% of net sales for fiscal 2017. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $51.7 million, or 31.7% of net sales, for fiscal 2018, compared to $49.9 million, or 36.4% of net sales, for fiscal 2017. Operating income during fiscal 2018 was $3.6 million, compared to a loss of $5.8 million for fiscal 2017. Other income for fiscal 2018 was $0.2 million, compared to other expense of $0.4 million for fiscal 2017. Income from continuing operations during fiscal 2018 was $2.3 million versus a loss of $6.9 million during fiscal 2017. Income from discontinued operations during fiscal 2018 was $1.5 million. There were no results from discontinued operations during fiscal 2017. Net income during fiscal 2018 was $3.8 million, compared to net loss of $6.9 million during fiscal 2017. Net Sales and Gross Profit Analysis Net sales by segment and percent change for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands): Net Sales PMT Canvys Healthcare Total FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 $ 128,296 $ 104,226 $ 105,554 26,683 20,534 23,453 8,233 12,112 13,009 $ 163,212 $ 136,872 $ 142,016 FY18 vs. FY17 % Change FY17 vs. FY16 % Change 23.1 % 29.9 % (32.0 %) 19.2 % (1.3 %) (12.4 %) (6.9 %) (3.6 %) During fiscal 2018, consolidated net sales increased by 19.2% compared to fiscal 2017. Sales for PMT increased by 23.1%, Canvys sales increased by 29.9% and Healthcare sales decreased by 32.0% due to the sale of the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (“PACS”) business in May 2017. During fiscal 2017, consolidated net sales decreased by 3.6% compared to fiscal 2016. Sales for PMT decreased by 1.3%, Canvys sales declined by 12.4% and Healthcare sales decreased by 6.9%. Gross profit by segment and percent of segment net sales for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands): Gross Profit PMT Canvys Healthcare Total FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 $ 43,254 8,410 3,418 $ 55,082 33.7 % $ 33,382 5,752 31.5 % 41.5 % 4,749 33.7 % $ 43,883 32.0 % $ 33,088 6,017 28.0 % 39.2 % 5,730 32.1 % $ 44,835 31.3 % 25.7 % 44.0 % 31.6 % 20 Gross profit reflects the distribution and manufacturing product margin less manufacturing variances, inventory obsolescence charges, customer returns, scrap and cycle count adjustments, engineering costs and other provisions. Consolidated gross profit was $55.1 million during fiscal 2018, compared to $43.9 million during fiscal 2017. Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 33.7% during fiscal 2018, from 32.1% during fiscal 2017. Gross margin during fiscal 2018 included expense related to inventory provisions for PMT of $0.6 million, $0.1 million for Canvys and $0.1 million for Healthcare. Gross margin during fiscal 2017 included expense related to inventory provisions for PMT of $0.4 million, $0.1 million for Canvys and less than $0.1 million for Healthcare. Consolidated gross profit was $43.9 million during fiscal 2017, compared to $44.8 million during fiscal 2016. Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 32.1% during fiscal 2017, from 31.6% during fiscal 2016. Gross margin during fiscal 2017 included expense related to inventory provisions for PMT of $0.4 million, $0.1 million for Canvys, and less than $0.1 million for Healthcare. Gross margin during fiscal 2016 included expense related to inventory provisions for PMT of $0.3 million, $0.4 million for Canvys, and less than $0.1 million for Healthcare. Power and Microwave Technologies Group Net sales for PMT increased 23.1% to $128.3 million during fiscal 2018, from $104.2 million during fiscal 2017. This growth was led by products sold into the semiconductor wafer fab equipment market and from new technology suppliers in key RF, Microwave and Power markets such as 5G infrastructure and power management applications. Power grid tube sales also increased. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 33.7% during fiscal 2018 as compared to 32.0% during fiscal 2017, primarily due to product mix and improved manufacturing absorption. Net sales for PMT decreased 1.3% to $104.2 million during fiscal 2017, from $105.6 million during fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2016, we recognized a large tube order for a military application that was mostly offset in fiscal 2017 by new technology suppliers in the RF, microwave and power market as well as increases in manufactured products associated with growth in the semiconductor wafer fab market. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 32.0% during fiscal 2017 as compared to 31.3% during fiscal 2016, primarily due to product mix and improved manufacturing absorption. Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions Net sales for Canvys increased 29.9% to $26.7 million during fiscal 2018, from $20.5 million during fiscal 2017. Sales were up in both Europe and North America due to the addition of new customers and programs and strong demand from existing customers throughout the year. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 31.5% during fiscal 2018 as compared to 28.0% during fiscal 2017, primarily due to product mix and foreign currency effects. Net sales for Canvys decreased 12.4% to $20.5 million during fiscal 2017, from $23.5 million during fiscal 2016. Sales in North America were down due to customer delays in new program rollouts. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 28.0% during fiscal 2017 as compared to 25.7% during fiscal 2016, primarily due to product mix and lower inventory reserves. Healthcare Net sales for Healthcare decreased 32.0% to $8.2 million during fiscal 2018, from $12.1 million during fiscal 2017. The reduction in sales was primarily due to the sale of the PACS display business at the end of fiscal 2017. The PACS display business had $4.1 million of sales in fiscal 2017. This decline was slightly offset by an increase in sales in our core Healthcare business. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales increased to 41.5% during fiscal 2018, compared to 39.2% during fiscal 2017. This increase was due to the sale of our PACS display business, which generated lower margins than our core Healthcare business. Net sales for Healthcare decreased 6.9% to $12.1 million during fiscal 2017, from $13.0 million during fiscal 2016. The reduction in sales was due to a decline in the PACS display business, which we divested in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. This decline was slightly offset by an increase in sales in our core Healthcare business including diagnostic imaging replacement parts and CT tubes. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased to 39.2% during fiscal 2017, compared to 44.0% during fiscal 2016. This decrease was primarily due to change in product mix that included a significant increase year over year in IMES equipment sales, which yield lower margins than replacement parts and CT tubes, in addition to continued pricing pressure on replacement parts resulting in lower margins. 21 Sales by Geographic Area On a geographic basis, our sales are categorized by destination: North America; Asia/Pacific; Europe; Latin America; and Other. Net sales by geographic area and percent change for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands): Net Sales North America Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Other (1) Total FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 $ 67,662 $ 55,963 $ 66,365 32,607 27,997 24,564 53,818 44,296 44,634 6,347 106 $ 163,212 $ 136,872 $ 142,016 9,123 2 8,552 64 FY18 vs. FY17 % Change FY17 vs. FY16 % Change 20.9 % 16.5 % 21.5 % 6.7 % (96.9 %) 19.2 % (15.7 %) 14.0 % (0.8 %) 34.7 % (39.6 %) (3.6 %) Gross profit by geographic area and percent of geographic net sales for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands): Gross Profit (Loss) North America Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Other (1) Total FY 2018 FY 2017 FY 2016 $ 25,996 10,794 18,071 3,602 (3,381 ) $ 55,082 38.4 % $ 20,597 33.1 % 9,630 33.6 % 14,418 3,250 39.5 % (4,012 ) 33.7 % $ 43,883 36.8 % $ 23,506 34.4 % 8,212 32.5 % 13,541 2,397 38.0 % (2,821 ) 32.1 % $ 44,835 35.4 % 33.4 % 30.3 % 37.8 % 31.6 % (1) Other primarily includes net sales not allocated to a specific geographical region, unabsorbed value-add costs and other unallocated expenses. We sell our products to customers in diversified industries and perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. Terms are generally on open account, payable net 30 days in North America, and vary throughout Asia/Pacific, Europe and Latin America. Estimates of credit losses are recorded in the financial statements based on monthly reviews of outstanding accounts. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased during fiscal 2018 to $51.7 million from $49.9 million during fiscal 2017. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased to 31.7% during fiscal 2018 as compared to 36.4% during fiscal 2017. The increase in expense was due to higher compensation and other expenses mostly related to the increase in net sales as well as higher research and development costs and other incremental expenses to support our growth strategies in Richardson Healthcare. During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company had a $1.3 million charge for severance expense related to a reduction in workforce. 22 Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased during fiscal 2017 to $49.9 million from $51.6 million during fiscal 2016. SG&A as a percentage of sales remained flat at 36.4% during fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease was due to lower salaries and incentive compensation expenses from workforce reductions, and a reduction of IT expenses compared to fiscal 2016, mostly offset by $1.3 million of severance expense related to a reduction in workforce during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. In addition, research and development expenses for Richardson Healthcare increased by $0.5 million. Other Income/Expense Other income/expense was income of $0.2 million during fiscal 2018, compared to expense of $0.4 million during fiscal 2017. Fiscal 2018 included $0.4 million of investment income, partially offset by $0.2 million of foreign exchange losses. Fiscal 2017 included $0.2 million of investment income, offset by $0.6 million of foreign exchange losses. Our foreign exchange gains and losses are primarily due to the translation of U.S. dollars held in non-U.S. entities. We currently do not utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to foreign currency. Income Tax Provision Our income tax provision from continuing operations during fiscal year 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $1.5 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The effective income tax rates from continuing operations during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 39.7%, (13.3)% and (8.8)%, respectively. The difference between the effective tax rates as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 29.2% during 2018 and 34% during 2017 and 2016 is primarily driven by the impact of recording a valuation allowance against all of our U.S. state and federal net deferred tax assets, repatriation of foreign earnings, changes in our geographical distribution of income (loss) and our recording of uncertain tax positions with respect to ASC 740-30, Income Taxes - Other Considerations or Special Areas (“ASC 740-30”). On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted new tax legislation, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). The primary provisions of the Act expected to impact the Company in fiscal 2018 are a reduction to the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and a transition from a worldwide corporate tax system to a territorial tax system. The reduction in the corporate income tax rate requires the Company to remeasure its net deferred tax assets to the new corporate tax rate and the transition to a territorial tax system requires payment of a one-time tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed and previously untaxed non-U.S. earnings. Primarily as a result of those provisions of the Act, the Company recorded a deferred remeasurement impact of approximately $1.6 million, which was fully offset by the valuation allowance movement. Additionally, the estimated deemed earnings repatriation tax, net of available foreign tax credits brought back as part of the deemed repatriation, was $3.5 million. The Company does not anticipate any cash tax payments due to the foreign tax credit carryforwards available to fully offset the provisional deemed repatriation tax. The 21% corporate income tax rate was effective January 1, 2018. Based on the Company’s June 2, 2018 fiscal year end, the U.S. statutory income tax rate for fiscal 2018 will be approximately 29.2%. The tax impact recorded for the Act for fiscal 2018 is provisional as outlined below and may change. The Company completed a preliminary assessment of earnings that could be repatriated based on reinvestment needs of non-U.S. operations and earnings available for repatriation. The estimated withholding tax that would be incurred from the repatriation of those earnings was included in fiscal 2018 provisional income tax expense. The Company continues to analyze the provisions of the Act addressing the net deferred tax asset remeasurement and its calculations, the deemed earnings repatriation, including the determination of undistributed non-U.S. earnings, and evaluate potential Company actions. In addition, the Company continues to monitor potential legislative action and regulatory interpretations of the Act. Based on the effective date of certain provisions, the Company will be subject to additional requirements of the Act beginning in fiscal 2019. Those provisions include a tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), a tax determined by base erosion and anti-avoidance tax (BEAT) related to certain payments between a U.S. corporation and foreign related entities, a limitation of certain executive compensation, a deduction for foreign derived intangible income (FDII) and interest expense limitations. The Company has not completed its analysis of those provisions and the estimated impact. The Company also has not determined its accounting policy to treat the taxes due on GILTI as a period cost or include in the determination of deferred taxes. In December 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 that allows for a measurement period up to one year after the enactment date of the Act to complete the accounting requirements. The Company will complete the adjustments related to the Act within the allowed period. 23 As of June 2, 2018, we had approximately $3.4 million of net deferred tax assets related to federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, compared to $4.2 million as of May 27, 2017. Net deferred tax assets related to domestic state NOL carryforwards amounted to approximately $3.9 million as of June 2, 2018, compared to $3.0 million as of May 27, 2017. Net deferred tax assets related to foreign NOL carryforwards as of June 2, 2018 totaled approximately $0.6 million with various or indefinite expiration dates. The amount of net deferred tax assets related to foreign NOL carryforwards was $0.7 million as of May 27, 2017. We also have a domestic net deferred tax asset of $0.5 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards as of June 2, 2018, compared to $3.8 million as of May 27, 2017. The changes in balances from prior year are generally due to the transition tax that was part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for which the deemed inclusion on foreign earnings utilized most of the foreign tax credit carryforwards available. We do not have any alternative minimum tax credit carryforward as of June 2, 2018. We have historically determined that undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, to the extent of cash available, will be repatriated to the U.S. We repatriated $21.2 million of foreign cash to our U.S. parent company in fiscal 2018, $17.7 million from our Hong Kong entity and the remainder from our entities in Singapore, Italy and Taiwan. Due to the deemed repatriation tax, the untaxed outside basis difference for which the historic balance has primarily related has been reduced. The deferred tax liability on the outside basis difference is now primarily withholding tax on future dividend distributions. Accordingly, we have reduced the deferred tax liability from $5.7 million in fiscal 2017 to be $0.3 million in fiscal 2018 on foreign earnings of $28.6 million. Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. A significant component of objective evidence evaluated was the cumulative income or loss incurred in each jurisdiction over the three-year period ended June 2, 2018. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider subjective evidence such as future income projections. We considered other positive evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance in the U.S. including the repatriation of foreign earnings which we do not consider permanently reinvested in certain of our foreign subsidiaries. The weight of this positive evidence is not sufficient to outweigh other negative evidence in evaluating our need for a valuation allowance in the U.S. jurisdiction. As of June 2, 2018, a valuation allowance of $9.1 million has been established to record only the portion of the deferred tax asset that will more likely than not be realized. There has been an increase in the valuation allowance from May 27, 2017 in the amount of $0.6 million. The valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions where historical taxable losses have been incurred. We also recorded a valuation allowance for all domestic federal and state net deferred tax assets considering the significant cumulative losses in the U.S. jurisdiction, the reversal of the deferred tax liability for foreign earnings and no forecast of additional U.S. income. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are increased, or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth. Income taxes paid, including foreign estimated tax payments, were $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.7 million, during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. Generally, years prior to fiscal 2010 are closed for examination under the statute of limitation for U.S. federal, U.S. state and local or non-U.S. tax jurisdictions. We are currently under examination in Thailand (fiscal 2008 through 2011). We are also under examination in the state of Illinois for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. Our primary foreign tax jurisdictions are Germany and the Netherlands. We have tax years open in Germany beginning in fiscal 2015 and the Netherlands beginning in fiscal 2012. The uncertain tax positions from continuing operations as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017 were $0.1 million and $0.0 million, respectively. We record penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax expense line item within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheets. We have not recorded a liability for interest and penalties as of June 2, 2018 or May 27, 2017. It is not expected that there will be a change in the unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of various statutes of limitations within the next 12 months. On September 12, 2017, the Company received an income tax refund from the State of Illinois of approximately $2.0 million, which included interest earned. The refund was a result of the conclusion of the Illinois amended return related to the sale of the RF, Wireless and Power Division (“RFPD”) in 2011. A net benefit of $1.5 million, which included $0.5 million of professional fee costs incurred to pursue the refund, was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 in discontinued operations. 24  Discontinued Operations On September 12, 2017, the Company received an income tax refund from the State of Illinois of approximately $2.0 million, which included interest earned. The refund was a result of the conclusion of the Illinois amended return related to the sale of the RF, Wireless and Power Division in 2011. A net benefit of $1.5 million, which included $0.5 million of professional fee costs incurred to pursue the refund, was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 in discontinued operations. Refer to Note 5 “Discontinued Operations” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Liquidity, Financial Position and Capital Resources Our operations and cash needs have been primarily financed through income from operations and cash on hand. Cash and cash equivalents were $60.5 million at June 2, 2018. Cash and cash equivalents at June 2, 2018, consisted of $26.5 million in North America, $20.2 million in Europe, $1.0 million in Latin America and $12.8 million in Asia/Pacific. We repatriated $21.2 million of foreign cash to our U.S. parent company in fiscal 2018, $17.7 million from our Hong Kong entity and the remainder from our entities in Singapore, Italy and Taiwan. Cash and cash equivalents were $55.4 million at May 27, 2017. Investments including CDs and time deposits classified as short-term investments were $6.4 million, and long-term investments were $2.4 million including equity securities of $0.6 million. Cash and investments at May 27, 2017, consisted of $16.3 million in North America, $15.5 million in Europe, $1.5 million in Latin America and $30.9 million in Asia/Pacific. During the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed a cash repatriation of $11.3 million, which included a return of capital and dividend from our Chinese entity to our U.S. parent company. We believe that the existing sources of liquidity, including current cash, will provide sufficient resources to meet known capital requirements and working capital needs through the next twelve months. Cash Flows from Operating Activities Positive cash flow from operating activities primarily resulted from our net income, adjusted for non-cash items and changes in our operating assets and liabilities. Operating activities provided $3.0 million of cash during fiscal 2018. We had net income of $3.8 million during fiscal 2018, which included non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million associated with the issuance of stock option awards and restricted stock awards, $0.8 million of inventory provisions and depreciation and amortization expense of $3.0 million associated with our property and equipment as well as amortization of our intangible assets. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities resulted in a use of cash of $5.0 million during fiscal 2018, primarily due to the increase in inventories of $8.2 million, the increase in accounts receivable of $1.8 million and the increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.6 million. These uses of cash were partially offset by the increase in our accounts payable of $3.5 million and the increase in accrued liabilities of $1.9 million. The inventory increase was due to the ongoing growth of our RF and power technologies business, increase in raw material and work in process supporting the semiconductor capital equipment market and growth in supplying replacement systems and parts to the Healthcare market. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to the increase in sales. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to an increase in our accrual for inventory in transit from vendors as well as timing of payments for some of our larger vendors for both inventory and services. The increase in accrued liabilities was primarily due to higher compensation accruals mostly related to the increase in net sales. Operating activities provided $1.8 million of cash during fiscal 2017. We had net loss of $6.9 million during fiscal 2017, which included non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million associated with the issuance of stock option awards, $0.5 million of inventory provisions and depreciation and amortization expense of $2.7 million associated with our property and equipment as well as amortization of our intangible assets. Changes in our operating assets and liabilities was $5.4 million during fiscal 2017, due primarily to the decrease in accounts receivable of $4.2 million, the decrease in inventories of $2.4 million, the increase in our accounts payable of $1.0 million, partially offset by the decrease in accrued liabilities of $0.7 million and the increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.3 million. The decrease in, or cash provided by, our inventory was primarily due to key supply chain efforts to reduce and manage inventory levels. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to the collection of a large receivable during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 that was invoiced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to an increase in our accrual for inventory in transit from vendors. The decrease in accrued liabilities was primarily due to a reduction in incentive accruals and an asset retirement obligation in France. The increase in prepaid expenses and other assets was due to investments in our Healthcare segment and other receivables with a supplier and for the sale of assets. 25  Cash Flows from Investing Activities The cash flow from investing activities consisted primarily of purchases and maturities of investments and capital expenditures. Cash provided by investing activities of $4.2 million during fiscal 2018 included proceeds from the maturities of investments of $12.3 million, partially offset by the purchases of investments of $3.9 million and $5.2 million in capital expenditures. Capital expenditures relate primarily to our Healthcare growth initiative, a new roof for part of our warehouse and capital used for our IT system. Cash used in investing activities of $3.8 million during fiscal 2017, which included proceeds from the maturities of investments of $3.6 million, offset by the purchases of investments of $2.2 million and $5.2 million in capital expenditures. Capital expenditures relates primarily to our Healthcare growth initiatives and capital equipment and software for our new IT system. Our purchases and proceeds from investments consist of time deposits and CDs. Purchasing of future investments may vary from period to period due to interest and foreign currency exchange rates. Cash Flows from Financing Activities The cash flow from financing activities primarily consists of cash dividends paid. Cash used in financing activities of $3.0 million during fiscal 2018 resulted primarily from cash used to pay dividends. Cash used in financing activities during fiscal 2017 was $3.0 million for dividend payments. All future payments of dividends are at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Dividend payments will depend on earnings, capital requirements, operating conditions and such other factors that the Board may deem relevant. Contractual Obligations Contractual obligations by expiration period are presented in the table below as of June 2, 2018 (in thousands): Lease obligations (1) Less than 1 year 1 - 3 years 4 - 5 years More than 5 years Total $ 1,629 $ 2,066 $ 19 $ 76 $ 3,790 (1) Lease obligations are related to certain warehouse and office facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. 26  Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management continuously evaluates its critical accounting policies and estimates, including the allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, inventory obsolescence, goodwill and other intangible assets, loss contingencies and income taxes. Management bases the estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical to understanding our financial position and the results of operations. Their application involves significant judgments and estimates in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Our allowance for doubtful accounts includes estimated losses that result from uncollectible receivables. The estimates are influenced by the following: continuing credit evaluation of customers’ financial conditions; aging of receivables, individually and in the aggregate; a large number of customers which are widely dispersed across geographic areas; and collectability and delinquency history by geographic area. Significant changes in one or more of these considerations may require adjustments affecting net income and net carrying value of accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.3 million as of June 2, 2018 and $0.4 million as of May 27, 2017. Revenue Recognition Our product sales are recognized as revenue upon shipment, when title passes to the customer, when delivery has occurred or services have been rendered and when collectability is reasonably assured. We also record estimated discounts and returns based on our historical experience. Our products are often manufactured to meet the specific design needs of our customers’ applications. Our engineers work closely with customers to ensure that our products will meet their needs. Our customers are under no obligation to compensate us for designing the products we sell. Inventories, net Our consolidated inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value, generally using a weighted-average cost method. Our net inventories include approximately $42.6 million of finished goods, $5.7 million of raw materials and $2.4 million of work-in-progress as of June 2, 2018, as compared to approximately $36.0 million of finished goods, $5.3 million of raw materials and $1.4 million of work-in-progress as of May 27, 2017. The inventory reserve as of June 2, 2018 was $4.0 million compared to $3.5 million as of May 27, 2017. At this time, we do not anticipate any material risks or uncertainties related to possible future inventory write-downs. Provisions for obsolete or slow moving inventories are recorded based upon regular analysis of stock rotation privileges, obsolescence, the exiting of certain markets and assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If future demand changes in an industry or market conditions differ from management’s estimates, additional provisions may be necessary. We recorded provisions to our inventory reserves of $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which were included in cost of sales. The provisions were primarily for obsolete and slow moving parts. The parts were written down to estimated realizable value. 27 Goodwill and Intangible Assets There was $6.3 million of goodwill reported on our balance sheet at both June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017. The goodwill balance in its entirety relates to our IMES reporting unit that is included in the Healthcare segment. We test goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate, loss of key personnel or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates step 2 from the goodwill impairment test as defined in ASU 2011-08. As amended, the goodwill impairment test will consist of one-step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity may still perform the optional qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2017-04 is required to be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 for our fiscal 2018 annual impairment test. During the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, our goodwill balances are reviewed for impairment using the first day of our fourth quarter as the measurement date. If after reviewing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then we test for impairment through the application of a fair value based test. After reviewing the totality of events or circumstances as provided in ASU 2011-08, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value for the IMES reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Accordingly, we performed the quantitative impairment test using the income method, which is based on a discounted future cash flow approach that uses the significant assumptions of projected revenue, projected operational profit, terminal growth rates and the cost of capital. The Company used a weighted average cost of capital of 19% for these cash flows. The Guideline Public Company Method was also included in the goodwill impairment study. The Company engaged a third party to assist with the goodwill impairment testing. Management concluded that the results of our goodwill impairment test as of March 4, 2018 indicated that the value of goodwill attributed to our IMES reporting unit was not impaired due to its fair value exceeded its carrying value. In the three years since the acquisition, the Company has made significant investments in the IMES business, including capital expenditures and inventory, that are expected to increase IMES’ product offerings and result in increased future sales, operating profits and cash flows. Although we believe our projected future operating results and cash flows and related estimates regarding fair values were based on reasonable assumptions, historically, projected operating results and cash flows have not always been achieved. As of the first day of our fourth quarter, we determined that our IMES reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of its carrying value of at least 8.0%. Factors considered were the historical performance of the reporting unit, forecasted financials for the following ten years and comparable publically held companies. Management’s projections used to estimate cash flows included increasing sales volumes from new product offerings, expanded sales into new geographies, and operational improvements designed to reduce costs. While all product lines are expected to grow, new product offerings are the largest component of the sales growth with more than 50% of future sales projected to be from new product offerings. Changes in any of the significant assumptions used, including if the Company does not successfully achieve its operating plan, which is largely dependent on sales from new product offerings, can materially affect the expected cash flows, and such impacts could result in a material non-cash impairment charge of goodwill and other long lived assets. Potential events or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect key assumptions are deterioration in general market conditions or the environment in which the reporting unit or entity operates, an increased competitive environment in which the reporting unit or entity operates or other relevant entity-specific events such as market acceptance of our new CT tubes and other new product offerings, approvals to sell in foreign markets, and changes in management or key personnel. Intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives either on a straight-line basis or over their projected future cash flows and are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate possible impairment. Our intangible assets represent the fair value for trade name, customer relationships, non- compete agreements and technology acquired in connection with the acquisition. 28  Long-Lived Assets We review property and equipment, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable. If adverse events do occur, our impairment review is based on an undiscounted cash flow analysis at the lowest level at which cash flows of the long-lived assets are largely independent of other groups of our assets and liabilities. This analysis requires management judgment with respect to changes in technology, the continued success of product lines and future volume, revenue and expense growth rates. We conduct annual reviews for idle and underutilized equipment and review business plans for possible impairment. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by the use of the asset or asset group. When impairment is indicated, the estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine the estimated fair value of the asset or asset group and an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value. Additionally, we also evaluate the remaining useful life each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of depreciation or amortization. If the estimate of a long lived asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the asset is amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life. Loss Contingencies We accrue a liability for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If we determine that there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred, we will include a disclosure describing the contingency. Income Taxes We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and determine the need for a valuation allowance based on a number of factors, including both positive and negative evidence. These factors include historical taxable income or loss, projected future taxable income or loss, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning strategies. In circumstances where we, or any of our affiliates, have incurred three years of cumulative losses which constitute significant negative evidence, positive evidence of equal or greater significance is needed to overcome the negative evidence before a tax benefit is recognized for deductible temporary differences and loss carryforwards. See Note 9 “Income Taxes” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information. 29 New Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is principles based guidance that can be applied to all contracts with customers, enhancing comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets. The core principle of the guidance is that entities should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The guidance details the steps entities should apply to achieve the core principle. In August 2015, the FASB issued an amendment to defer the effective date for all entities by one year. For public entities, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the option of using either a full or modified retrospective approach in applying this standard. During fiscal 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued four additional updates which further clarify the guidance provided in ASU 2014-09. We have undertaken a detailed analysis of our various contracts with customers and revenue streams, including engaging a third party to assist management in evaluating the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company’s management has elected to adopt the amendments in ASU 2014-09 on a modified retrospective basis; whereas any cumulative effect of adopting this guidance will be recognized as an adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings. Prior periods will not be retrospectively adjusted. The Company does not expect the implementation of ASU 2014-09 and the related amendments to have a material impact on the timing, amount or characterization of revenue recognized by the Company. For most of our revenue, we will continue to recognize revenue when title to the goods transfers to the customer, as this is generally when control transfers to the customer. While we expect the impact of these new standards will be immaterial to our financial statements, upon adoption, we will include the expanded disclosures required by the new standards. Pursuant to the Company’s adoption of the standard it anticipates expanding its disclosures in the consolidated financial statements for revenue recognition, assets and liabilities relating to contracts with customers, the nature of the Company’s performance obligations and the manner by which the Company determines and allocates transaction prices and variable consideration to its performance obligations and the significant judgments inherent in its revenue recognition policies. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (“ASU 2015-11”), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015- 11 requires inventory within the scope of the ASU (e.g., first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost) to be measured using the lower of cost and net realizable value. Inventory excluded from the scope of the ASU (i.e., last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method) will continue to be measured at the lower of cost or market. The ASU also amends some of the other guidance in Topic 330, “Inventory,” to more clearly articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory. However, those amendments are not intended to result in any changes to current practice. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 in fiscal 2018 and there was no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Upon adoption, the Company expects that the amounts recognized for the ROU asset and lease liability in the balance sheets may be material. 30  In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, a new accounting standard update intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including: income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. Specifically, the ASU 2016-09 requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes) be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), introducing a new element of volatility to the provision for income taxes. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on May 28, 2017. Effective with the adoption of the ASU all share-based awards continue to be accounted for as equity awards, excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation expense are reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as a component of the provision for income taxes on a prospective basis, excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation expense are classified as an operating activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows on a prospective basis and the Company has elected to continue to estimate expected forfeitures over the course of a vesting period. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 had no impact on the retained earnings, other components of equity or net assets as of the beginning of the period of adoption. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 introduces a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. The estimate of expected credit losses will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU also expands the disclosure requirements to enable users of financial statements to understand the entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating expected credit losses. For public business entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the guidance is to be applied using the modified-retrospective approach. Earlier adoption is permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 ("ASU 2016-15"), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As amended, the goodwill impairment test will consist of one-step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity may still perform the optional qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2017-04 is required to be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 for our fiscal 2018 annual impairment test. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The guidance permits entities to reclassify tax effects stranded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income as a result of tax reform to retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in annual and interim periods and can be applied retrospectively or in the period of adoption. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, regarding the accounting implications of the recently issued Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). This standard is effective immediately. The update clarifies that in a company’s financial statements that include the reporting period in which the Act was enacted, the company must first reflect the income tax effects of the Act in which the accounting under GAAP is complete. These amounts would not be provisional amounts. The company would also report provisional amounts for those specific income tax effects for which the accounting under GAAP is incomplete but a reasonable estimate can be determined. The Company has recorded a provisional amount which it believes is a reasonable estimate of the effects of the Act on the Company’s financial statements as of June 2, 2018. Technical corrections or other forthcoming guidance could change how the Company interprets provisions of the Act, which may impact its effective tax rate and could affect its deferred tax assets, tax positions and/or its tax liabilities. 31 ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Risk Management and Market Sensitive Financial Instruments We are exposed to many different market risks with the various industries we serve. The primary financial risk we are exposed to is foreign currency exchange, as certain operations, assets and liabilities of ours are denominated in foreign currencies. We manage these risks through normal operating and financing activities. The interpretation and analysis of these disclosures should not be considered in isolation since such variances in exchange rates would likely influence other economic factors. Such factors, which are not readily quantifiable, would likely also affect our operations. Additional disclosure regarding various market risks are set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on this Form 10-K. Foreign Currency Exposure Even though we take into account current foreign currency exchange rates at the time an order is taken, our financial statements, denominated in a non-U.S. functional currency, are subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Our foreign denominated assets and liabilities are cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and intercompany receivables and payables, as we conduct business in countries of the European Union, Asia/Pacific and, to a lesser extent, Canada and Latin America. We do manage foreign exchange exposures by using currency clauses in certain sales contracts and we also have local debt to offset asset exposures. We have not used any derivative instruments nor entered into any forward contracts in fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016. Had the U.S. dollar changed unfavorably 10% against various foreign currencies, foreign denominated net sales would have been lower by an estimated $10.4 million during fiscal 2018, an estimated $9.1 million during fiscal 2017 and an estimated $9.9 million during fiscal 2016. Total assets would have declined by an estimated $5.6 million as of the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018 and an estimated $5.2 million as of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017, while the total liabilities would have decreased by an estimated $1.0 million as of the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018 and an estimated $0.9 million as of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017. The interpretation and analysis of these disclosures should not be considered in isolation since such variances in exchange rates would likely influence other economic factors. Such factors, which are not readily quantifiable, would likely also affect our operations. 32 ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Richardson Electronics, Ltd. Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except per share amounts) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, less allowance of $309 and $398, respectively Inventories, net Prepaid expenses and other assets Investments - current Total current assets Non-current assets: Property, plant and equipment, net Goodwill Intangible assets, net Non-current deferred income taxes Investments - non-current Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Total current liabilities Non-current liabilities: Non-current deferred income tax liabilities Other non-current liabilities Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Stockholders’ equity June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 $ $ $ 60,465 $ 22,892 50,720 3,747 — 137,824 18,232 6,332 3,014 927 — 28,505 166,329 $ 19,603 $ 10,343 29,946 281 921 1,202 31,148 55,327 20,782 42,749 3,070 6,429 128,357 15,813 6,332 3,441 1,102 2,419 29,107 157,464 15,933 8,311 24,244 158 735 893 25,137 Common stock, $0.05 par value; issued and outstanding 10,806 shares at June 2, 2018 and 10,712 shares at May 27, 2017 Class B common stock, convertible, $0.05 par value; issued and outstanding 2,137 shares at June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017 Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, no shares issued Additional paid-in-capital Common stock in treasury, at cost, no shares at June 2, 2018 and at May 27, 2017 Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 540 535 107 — 60,061 — 70,107 4,366 135,181 166,329 $ 107 — 59,436 — 69,333 2,916 132,327 157,464 33 Richardson Electronics, Ltd. Audited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands, except per share amounts) Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Selling, general and administrative expenses Gain on disposal of business Gain on disposal of assets Operating income (loss) Other (income) expense: Investment/interest income Foreign exchange loss Other, net Total other (income) expense Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes Income tax provision Income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Net income (loss) Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax Fair value adjustments on investments gain (loss) Comprehensive income (loss) Net income (loss) per Common share - Basic: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Total net income (loss) per Common share - Basic: Net income (loss) per Class B common share - Basic: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Total net income (loss) per Class B common share - Basic: Net income (loss) per Common share - Diluted: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Total income (loss) per Common share - Diluted: Net income (loss) per Class B common share - Diluted: Income (loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Total net income (loss) per Class B common share - Diluted: Weighted average number of shares: Common shares - Basic Class B common shares - Basic Common shares - Diluted Class B common shares - Diluted Dividends per common share Dividends per Class B common share $ 163,212 $ 108,130 55,082 51,729 — (276 ) 3,629 136,872 $ 92,989 43,883 49,854 (209 ) — (5,762 ) (432 ) 224 (23 ) (231 ) 3,860 1,534 2,326 1,496 3,822 1,580 (130 ) 5,272 $ 0.18 $ 0.12 0.30 $ 0.16 $ 0.11 0.27 $ 0.18 $ 0.12 0.30 $ 0.16 $ 0.11 0.27 $ 10,765 2,137 10,824 2,137 0.240 $ 0.220 $ (234 ) 612 (24 ) 354 (6,116 ) 812 (6,928 ) — (6,928 ) 90 54 (6,784 ) $ (0.55 ) $ — (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ — (0.49 ) $ (0.55 ) $ — (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ — (0.49 ) $ 10,705 2,140 10,705 2,140 0.240 $ 0.220 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 34 142,016 97,181 44,835 51,632 — (244 ) (6,553 ) (562 ) 212 17 (333 ) (6,220 ) 546 (6,766 ) — (6,766 ) (759 ) (44 ) (7,569 ) (0.53 ) — (0.53 ) (0.47 ) — (0.47 ) (0.53 ) — (0.53 ) (0.47 ) — (0.47 ) 10,908 2,141 10,908 2,141 0.240 0.220 Richardson Electronics, Ltd. Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 $ 3,822 $ (6,928 ) $ (6,766 ) Operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Inventory provisions Loss (gain) on sale of investments Gain on disposal of business Gain on disposal of assets Share-based compensation expense Deferred income taxes Change in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquired business: Accounts receivable Income tax receivable Inventories Prepaid expenses and other assets Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Long-term liabilities-accrued pension Other Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Investing activities: Cash consideration paid for acquired business Capital expenditures Proceeds from sale of assets Proceeds from maturity of investments Purchases of investments Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities Purchases of available-for-sale securities Other Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Financing activities: Repurchase of common stock Proceeds from issuance of common stock Cash dividends paid Other Net cash used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: $ Cash paid during the fiscal year for: Income taxes 35 2,993 773 (183 ) — (276 ) 533 319 (1,764 ) — (8,247 ) (627 ) 3,457 1,906 — 246 2,952 — (5,239 ) 374 12,315 (3,943 ) 913 (265 ) (3 ) 4,152 2,740 456 (6 ) (209 ) — 437 (55 ) 4,167 17 2,408 (1,318 ) 1,037 (699 ) (249 ) 11 1,809 — (5,221 ) — 3,582 (2,136 ) 306 (306 ) (12 ) (3,787 ) — 97 (3,048 ) — (2,951 ) 985 5,138 55,327 60,465 $ — 30 (3,031 ) — (3,001 ) (148 ) (5,127 ) 60,454 55,327 $ 2,381 690 1 — (244 ) 548 201 (3,521 ) 912 (5,865 ) (16 ) (899 ) (1,027 ) (465 ) 486 (13,584 ) (12,209 ) (4,813 ) 402 27,026 (2,151 ) 268 (268 ) (20 ) 8,235 (5,015 ) 142 (3,079 ) (4 ) (7,956 ) (776 ) (14,081 ) 74,535 60,454 474 362 715 Richardson Electronics, Ltd. Audited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (in thousands, except per share amounts) Common Class B Common Par Value Additional Paid In Capital Common Stock in Treasury Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Total 11,530 2,141 $ 684 $ 63,252 $ — $ 89,141 $ 3,575 $ 156,652 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (6,766 ) — — — (759 ) (44 ) (6,766 ) (759 ) (44 ) — — — 548 — — — 548 28 — (855 ) — — — — — 1 — (43 ) — 141 — (4,972 ) — — (5,015 ) 5,015 — — — — (4 ) — — — — 142 (5,015 ) — (4 ) — — 10,703 — — 2,141 $ — — 642 $ — — 58,969 $ — — — $ (2,615 ) (464 ) 79,292 $ — — (2,615 ) (464 ) 2,772 $ 141,675 — — — — 5 4 — — — — — (4 ) — — — — — — — — — 437 30 — — — — — — — (6,928 ) — — — — — — 90 54 (6,928 ) 90 54 — 437 — — 30 — — — 10,712 — — 2,137 $ — — 642 $ — — 59,436 $ — — — $ (2,567 ) (464 ) 69,333 $ — — (2,567 ) (464 ) 2,916 $ 132,327 — — — — — 16 78 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 4 — — — 98 435 96 (4 ) — — — — — — — 3,822 — — — — — — — 1,580 (130 ) 3,822 1,580 (130 ) — — — — 98 435 97 — — — 10,806 — — 2,137 $ — — 647 $ — — 60,061 $ — — — $ (2,586 ) (462 ) 70,107 $ — — (2,586 ) (462 ) 4,366 $ 135,181 36 Balance May 30, 2015: Comprehensive loss Net loss Foreign currency translation Fair value adjustments on investments Share-based compensation: Stock options Common stock: Options exercised Repurchase of common stock Cancellation of treasury stock Other Dividends paid to: Common ($0.24 per share) Class B ($0.22 per share) Balance May 28, 2016: Comprehensive loss Net loss Foreign currency translation Fair value adjustments on investments Share-based compensation: Stock options Common stock: Options exercised Convert Class B to Common Dividends paid to: Common ($0.24 per share) Class B ($0.22 per share) Balance May 27, 2017: Comprehensive income Net income Foreign currency translation Fair value adjustments on investments Share-based compensation: Restricted stock Stock options Common stock: Options exercised Restricted stock issuance Dividends paid to: Common ($0.24 per share) Class B ($0.22 per share) Balance June 2, 2018: 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (in thousands, except per share amounts) Richardson Electronics, Ltd. is a leading global provider of engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tubes and related consumables; power conversion and RF and microwave components; high value flat panel detector solutions, replacement parts, tubes and service training for diagnostic imaging equipment; and customized display solutions. We serve customers in the alternative energy, healthcare, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. The Company’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and “engineered solutions” based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. The Company provides solutions and adds value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics and aftermarket technical service and repair through its global infrastructure. Our products include electron tubes and related components, microwave generators, subsystems used in semiconductor manufacturing and visual technology solutions. These products are used to control, switch or amplify electrical power signals, or are used as display devices in a variety of industrial, commercial, medical and communication applications. We have three operating and reportable segments, which we define as follows: Power and Microwave Technologies Group (“PMT”) combines our core engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube business with new RF and power technologies. As a manufacturer and authorized distributor, PMT’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and engineered solutions based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. We provide solutions and add value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics and aftermarket technical service and repair—all through our existing global infrastructure. PMT’s focus is on products for power, RF and microwave applications for customers in alternative energy, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. PMT focuses on various applications including broadcast transmission, CO2 laser cutting, diagnostic imaging, dielectric and induction heating, high energy transfer, high voltage switching, plasma, power conversion, radar and radiation oncology. PMT also offers its customers technical services for both microwave and industrial equipment. Canvys provides customized display solutions serving the corporate enterprise, financial, healthcare, industrial and medical original equipment manufacturers markets. Our engineers design, manufacture, source and support a full spectrum of solutions to match the needs of our customers. We offer long term availability and proven custom display solutions that include touch screens, protective panels, custom enclosures, all-in-ones, specialized cabinet finishes and application specific software packages and certification services. We partner with both private label manufacturing companies and leading branded hardware vendors to offer the highest quality display and touch solutions and customized computing platforms. Healthcare manufactures, refurbishes and distributes high value replacement parts for the healthcare market including hospitals, medical centers, asset management companies, independent service organizations and multi-vendor service providers. Products include Diagnostic Imaging replacement parts for CT and MRI systems; replacement CT and MRI tubes; CT service training; MRI coils, cold heads and RF amplifiers; hydrogen thyratrons, klystrons, magnetrons; flat panel detector upgrades; and additional replacement solutions currently under development for the diagnostic imaging service market. Through a combination of newly developed products and partnerships, service offerings and training programs, we believe we can help our customers improve efficiency and deliver better clinical outcomes while lowering the cost of healthcare delivery. We currently have operations in the following major geographic regions: North America, Asia/Pacific, Europe and Latin America. Customer Concentration: No one customer represented more than 10 percent of our total accounts receivable balance as of June 2, 2018 or May 27, 2017. LAM Research Corporation individually accounted for 11 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018. No one customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2017. Supplier Concentration: One of our suppliers represented 15 percent of our total cost of sales as of June 2, 2018 and 14 percent as of May 27, 2017. The amount owed to this supplier was approximately $1.9 million as of June 2, 2018 and $2.3 million as of May 27, 2017. 37 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for all fiscal years presented. The consolidated financial statements include our wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Our fiscal year 2018 began on May 28, 2017 and ended on June 2, 2018, our fiscal year 2017 began on May 29, 2016 and ended on May 27, 2017 and our fiscal year 2016 began on May 31, 2015 and ended on May 28, 2016. Unless otherwise noted, all references to a particular year in this document shall mean our fiscal year. 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND DISCLOSURES Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management continuously evaluates its critical accounting policies and estimates, including the allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, inventory obsolescence, goodwill and other intangible assets, loss contingencies and income taxes. Management bases the estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, however, actual results could differ from those estimates. Fair Values of Financial Instruments: The fair values of financial instruments are determined based on quoted market prices and market interest rates as of the end of the reporting period. Our financial instruments include investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate carrying values at June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017. Cash and Cash Equivalents: We consider short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates, and that have a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate the fair market value of these assets. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Our allowance for doubtful accounts includes estimated losses that result from uncollectible receivables. The estimates are influenced by the following: continuing credit evaluation of customers’ financial conditions; aging of receivables, individually and in the aggregate; a large number of customers which are widely dispersed across geographic areas; and collectability and delinquency history by geographic area. Significant changes in one or more of these considerations may require adjustments affecting net income and net carrying value of accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $0.3 million as of June 2, 2018 and $0.4 million as of May 27, 2017. Loss Contingencies: We accrue a liability for loss contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. If we determine that there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred, we will include a disclosure describing the contingency. Revenue Recognition: Our product sales are recognized as revenue upon shipment, when title passes to the customer, when delivery has occurred or services have been rendered and when collectability is reasonably assured. We also record estimated discounts and returns based on our historical experience. Our products are often manufactured to meet the specific design needs of our customers’ applications. Our engineers work closely with customers to ensure that our products will meet their needs. Our customers are under no obligation to compensate us for designing the products we sell. Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency is the local currency at all foreign locations, with the exception of Hong Kong, which the functional currency is the US dollar. Balance sheet items for our foreign entities, included in our consolidated balance sheets, are translated into U.S. dollars at end-of-period spot rates. Gains and losses resulting from translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements are credited or charged directly to accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. Revenues and expenses are translated at the current rate on the date of the transaction. Gains and losses resulting 38 from foreign currency transactions are included in income. Foreign exchange losses reflected in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) were a loss of $0.2 million during fiscal 2018, a loss of $0.6 million during fiscal 2017 and a loss of $0.2 million during fiscal 2016. Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs: Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are reported as revenue and the related costs are reported as a component of cost of sales. Inventories, net: Our consolidated inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value, generally using a weighted-average cost method. Our net inventories include approximately $42.6 million of finished goods, $5.7 million of raw materials and $2.4 million of work-in-progress as of June 2, 2018 as compared to approximately $36.0 million of finished goods, $5.3 million of raw materials and $1.4 million of work-in-progress as of May 27, 2017. The inventory reserve as of June 2, 2018 was $4.0 million compared to $3.5 million as of May 27, 2017. Provisions for obsolete or slow moving inventories are recorded based upon regular analysis of stock rotation privileges, obsolescence, the exiting of certain markets and assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If future demand changes in the industry or market conditions differ from management’s estimates, additional provisions may be necessary. We recorded provisions to our inventory reserves of $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which were included in cost of sales. The provisions were primarily for obsolete and slow moving parts. The parts were written down to estimated realizable value. Income Taxes: We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and determine the need for a valuation allowance based on a number of factors, including both positive and negative evidence. These factors include historical taxable income or loss, projected future taxable income or loss, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, and the implementation of tax planning strategies. In circumstances where we, or any of our affiliates, have incurred three years of cumulative losses which constitute significant negative evidence, positive evidence of equal or greater significance is needed to overcome the negative evidence before a tax benefit is recognized for deductible temporary differences and loss carryforwards. Investments: As of June 2, 2018, we had no investments. As of May 27, 2017, we have invested in time deposits and certificates of deposit (“CD”) in the amount of $8.2 million. Of this, $6.4 million mature in less than twelve months and $1.8 million mature in greater than twelve months. We liquidated our investments in equity securities in fiscal 2018. Proceeds from the liquidation were $0.9 million with gross realized gains of $0.2 million for fiscal 2018. Prior to the liquidation of our investment in equity securities, our investments in equity securities were classified as available-for-sale and were carried at their fair value based on quoted market prices. Our investments, which were included in non-current assets, had a carrying amount of $0.6 million at May 27, 2017. Proceeds from the sale of securities were $0.3 million during fiscal 2017 and $0.3 million during fiscal 2016. Prior to liquidation of the equity securities, we reinvested proceeds from the sale of securities, and the cost of the equity securities sold was based on a specific identification method. Gross realized gains and losses on those sales were less than $0.1 million during fiscal 2017 and 2016. Net unrealized holding gain (loss) during fiscal 2017 and 2016 were less than $0.1 million and have been included in accumulated comprehensive loss during its respective fiscal year. Discontinued Operations: On September 12, 2017, the Company received an income tax refund from the State of Illinois of approximately $2.0 million, which included interest earned. The refund was a result of the conclusion of the Illinois amended return related to the sale of the RF, Wireless and Power Division (“RFPD”) in 2011. A net benefit of $1.5 million, which included $0.5 million of professional fee costs incurred to pursue the refund, was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 in discontinued operations. During fiscal 2017, the Company disposed of, by sale, the PACS Display business in the Healthcare segment. Based on our assessment of the criteria that must be met to qualify a disposal transaction as a discontinued operation set forth in Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, the disposal of the PACS Display business does not qualify as a discontinued operation. 39 Goodwill and Intangible Assets: We test goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate, loss of key personnel or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As amended, the goodwill impairment test will consist of one-step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity may still perform the optional qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2017-04 is required to be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 for our fiscal 2018 annual impairment test. During the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, our goodwill balances are reviewed for impairment using the first day of our fourth quarter as the measurement date. If after reviewing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then we test for impairment through the application of a fair value based test. We estimate the fair value of each of our reporting units based on projected future operating results, market approach and discounted cash flows. After reviewing the totality of events or circumstances as provided in FASB ASC 350-20-35, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value for the IMES reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Accordingly, the quantitative goodwill impairment test as described in FASB ASC 350-20-35 was performed. We performed the quantitative impairment test using the income method, which is based on a discounted future cash flow approach that uses the significant assumptions of projected revenue, projected operational profit, terminal growth rates and the cost of capital. Refer to Note 7 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives either on a straight-line basis or over their projected future cash flows and are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate possible impairment. Our intangible assets represent the fair value for trade name, customer relationships, non- compete agreements and technology acquired in connection with the acquisition. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Improvements and replacements are capitalized while expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for depreciation are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation expense was approximately $2.6 million, $2.4 million and $2.0 million during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Property, plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands): Land and improvements Buildings and improvements Computer, communications equipment and software Construction in progress Machinery and other equipment Accumulated depreciation Property, plant, and equipment, net June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 1,301 $ 21,673 9,652 1,582 12,004 46,212 $ (27,980 ) 18,232 $ 1,301 19,885 8,551 2,063 10,387 42,187 (26,374 ) 15,813 $ $ $ Construction in progress at June 2, 2018 includes $0.7 million related to our Healthcare growth initiatives. All projects are expected to be completed before the end of fiscal 2019. Supplemental disclosure information of the estimated useful life of the assets: Land improvements Buildings and improvements Computer and communications equipment Machinery and other equipment 10 years 10 - 30 years 3 - 10 years 3 - 20 years We review all property, plant and equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances occur which indicate a possible impairment may exist. We have concluded that our property, plant and equipment as of June 2, 2018 were not impaired. Accrued Liabilities: Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): Compensation and payroll taxes Accrued severance (1) Professional fees Deferred revenue Other accrued expenses Accrued Liabilities June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 3,250 3,449 $ $ 706 454 535 527 1,460 2,395 2,360 3,518 8,311 10,343 $ $ (1) In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company executed a reduction in headcount to streamline operations and reduce costs and recorded $1.3 million of expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses for employee termination costs payable to terminated employees with employment and/or separation agreements with the Company. The changes in the severance accrual for fiscal 2018 included provisions and payments of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The changes in the severance accrual for fiscal 2017 included provisions and payments of $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Warranties: We offer warranties for the limited number of specific products we manufacture. We also provide extended warranties for some products we sell that lengthen the period of coverage specified in the manufacturer’s original warranty. Our warranty terms generally range from one to three years. We estimate the cost to perform under the warranty obligation and recognize this estimated cost at the time of the related product sale. We record expense related to our warranty obligations as cost of sales in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Each quarter, we assess actual warranty costs incurred on a product-by-product basis and compare the warranty costs to our estimated warranty obligation. With respect to new products, estimates are based generally on knowledge of the products, the extended warranty period and warranty experience. Warranty reserves are established for costs that are expected to be incurred after the sale and delivery of products under warranty. Warranty reserves are included in accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The warranty reserves are determined based on known product failures, historical experience and other available evidence. Changes in the warranty reserve during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands): Balance at May 30, 2016 Accruals for products sold Utilization Recovery Balance at May 27, 2017 Accruals for products sold Utilization Balance at June 2, 2018 Warranty Reserve 210 $ 89 (78 ) (115 ) 106 65 (22 ) 149 $ $ Other Non-Current Liabilities: Other non-current liabilities of $0.9 million at June 2, 2018 and $0.7 million at May 27, 2017, primarily represent employee-benefits obligations in various non-US locations. Share-Based Compensation: We measure and recognize share-based compensation cost at fair value for all share-based payments, including stock options. We estimate fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires assumptions such as expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected life and dividends. Compensation cost is recognized using a graded-vesting schedule over the applicable vesting period. Share-based compensation expense totaled approximately $0.5 million during fiscal 2018, $0.4 million during fiscal 2017 and $0.5 million during fiscal 2016. 41 Stock options granted generally vest over a period of five years and have contractual terms to exercise of 10 years. A summary of stock option activity is as follows (in thousands, except option prices and years): Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value Number of Options Options Outstanding at May 30, 2015 Granted Exercised Forfeited Cancelled Options Outstanding at May 28, 2016 Granted Exercised Forfeited Cancelled Options Outstanding at May 27, 2017 Granted Exercised Forfeited Cancelled Options Outstanding at June 2, 2018 Options Vested at June 2, 2018 1,137 $ 122 (28 ) (105 ) (107 ) 1,019 $ 190 (5 ) (43 ) (88 ) 1,073 $ 200 (16 ) (11 ) (51 ) 1,195 $ 746 $ 10.35 5.88 5.18 10.98 9.97 9.93 6.90 5.61 8.39 11.17 9.38 6.08 5.85 8.05 9.36 8.89 9.87 5.8 $ 4.5 $ 2,033 876 There were 16,000 stock options exercised during fiscal 2018, with cash received of $0.1 million. The total intrinsic value of options exercised totaled less than $0.1 million during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. The weighted average fair value of stock option grants was $0.85 during fiscal 2018, $1.14 during fiscal 2017 and $1.21 during fiscal 2016. As of June 2, 2018, total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options was approximately $0.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of approximately three to four years. The total grant date fair value of stock options vested during fiscal 2018 was $0.4 million. The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: Expected volatility Risk-free interest rate Expected lives (years) Annual cash dividend June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 21.92 % 2.22 % 6.31 0.24 $ 25.41 % 1.46 % 6.50 0.24 $ 32.21 % 1.78 % 6.50 0.24 $ The expected volatility assumptions are based on historical experience commensurate with the expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a treasury note with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the stock option. The expected stock option life assumption is based on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 (“SAB No. 107”). For stock options granted during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, we believe that our historical stock option experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. We utilized the Safe Harbor option, or Simplified Method, to determine the expected term of these options in accordance with SAB No. 107 for options granted. We intend to continue to utilize the Simplified Method for future grants in accordance with SAB No. 110 until such time that we believe that our historical stock option experience will provide a reasonable basis to estimate an expected term. 42 The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 2, 2018 (in thousands, except option prices and years): Outstanding Vested Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Life Aggregate Intrinsic Value Exercise Price Range $5.03 to $6.47 $6.90 to $10.85 $11.14 to $13.76 Total Shares 5.76 383 $ 8.48 385 $ 427 $ 12.05 8.89 1,195 $ 6.4 $ 1,508 190 $ 525 159 $ 7.3 $ 4.1 $ 5.8 $ 2,033 746 $ 5.63 9.31 — 397 $ 12.12 9.87 4.0 $ 6.4 $ 4.0 $ 4.5 $ 772 104 — 876 As of June 2, 2018, a summary of restricted stock award transactions was as follows (in thousands): Unvested at May 27, 2017 Granted Unvested at June 2, 2018 Unvested Restricted Shares — 78 78 Compensation effects arising from issuing stock awards have been charged against income and recorded as additional paid- in-capital in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity during fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016. The Employees’ 2011 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares as incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options or stock awards. Under this plan, 524,000 shares are reserved for future issuance. The Plan authorizes the granting of stock options at the fair market value at the date of grant. Generally, these options become exercisable over five years and expire up to 10 years from the date of grant. Earnings per Share: We have authorized 17,000,000 shares of common stock, and 3,000,000 shares of Class B common stock. The Class B common stock has 10 votes per share and has transferability restrictions; however, Class B common stock may be converted into common stock on a share-for-share basis at any time. With respect to dividends and distributions, shares of common stock and Class B common stock rank equally and have the same rights, except that Class B common stock cash dividends are limited to 90% of the amount of Class A common stock cash dividends. In accordance with ASC 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), our Class B common stock is considered a participating security requiring the use of the two-class method for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. The two-class computation method for each period reflects the cash dividends paid per share for each class of stock, plus the amount of allocated undistributed earnings per share computed using the participation percentage which reflects the dividend rights of each class of stock. Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed using the two-class method as prescribed in ASC 260. The shares of Class B common stock are considered to be participating convertible securities since the shares of Class B common stock are convertible on a share-for-share basis into shares of common stock and may participate in dividends with common stock according to a predetermined formula which is 90% of the amount of Class A common stock cash dividends. 43 The earnings per share (“EPS”) presented in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) are based on the following (in thousands, except per share amounts): Numerator for Basic and Diluted EPS: Income (loss) from continuing operations Less dividends: Common stock Class B common stock Undistributed losses Common stock undistributed losses Class B common stock undistributed losses Total undistributed losses Income from discontinued operations Less dividends: Common stock Class B common stock Undistributed losses Common stock undistributed losses Class B common stock undistributed losses Total undistributed losses Net income (loss) Less dividends: Common stock Class B common stock Undistributed income (losses) Common stock undistributed income (losses) Class B common stock undistributed income (losses) Total undistributed income (losses) Denominator for Basic and Diluted EPS: June 2, 2018 For the Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted $ 2,326 $ 2,326 $ (6,928 ) $ (6,928 ) $ (6,766 ) $ (6,766 ) 2,586 462 (722 ) $ (613 ) $ (109 ) (722 ) $ 1,496 $ 2,586 462 (722 ) $ (613 ) $ (109 ) (722 ) $ 1,496 $ 2,586 462 (1,552 ) $ (1,317 ) $ (235 ) (1,552 ) $ 3,822 $ 2,586 462 (1,552 ) $ (1,318 ) $ (234 ) (1,552 ) $ 3,822 $ 2,567 464 (9,959 ) $ (8,440 ) $ (1,519 ) (9,959 ) $ — $ 2,567 464 (3,031 ) $ (2,567 ) $ (464 ) (3,031 ) $ (6,928 ) $ 2,567 464 (9,959 ) $ (8,440 ) $ (1,519 ) (9,959 ) $ — $ 2,567 464 (3,031 ) $ (2,567 ) $ (464 ) (3,031 ) $ (6,928 ) $ 2,615 464 (9,845 ) $ (8,367 ) $ (1,478 ) (9,845 ) $ — $ 2,615 464 (3,079 ) $ (2,615 ) $ (464 ) (3,079 ) $ (6,766 ) $ 2,586 462 774 $ 657 $ 2,586 462 774 $ 657 $ 2,567 464 (9,959 ) $ (8,440 ) $ 2,567 464 (9,959 ) $ (8,440 ) $ 2,615 464 (9,845 ) $ (8,367 ) $ 2,615 464 (9,845 ) (8,367 ) (1,478 ) (9,845 ) — 2,615 464 (3,079 ) (2,615 ) (464 ) (3,079 ) (6,766 ) 2,615 464 (9,845 ) (8,367 ) 117 774 $ 117 774 $ (1,519 ) (9,959 ) $ (1,519 ) (9,959 ) $ (1,478 ) (9,845 ) $ (1,478 ) (9,845 ) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Common stock weighted average shares Class B common stock weighted average shares, and shares under if-converted method for diluted EPS Effect of dilutive securities Dilutive stock options Denominator for diluted EPS adjusted for weighted average shares and assumed conversions Income (loss) from continuing operations per 10,765 10,765 10,705 10,705 10,908 10,908 2,137 2,137 2,140 2,140 2,141 2,141 59 — 12,961 12,845 13,049 share: Common stock Class B common stock $ $ 0.18 $ 0.16 $ 0.18 $ 0.16 $ (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.53 ) $ (0.47 ) $ (0.53 ) (0.47 ) Income from discontinued operations per share: $ Common stock Class B common stock $ Net income (loss) per share: Common stock Class B common stock $ $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — — 0.30 $ 0.27 $ 0.30 $ 0.27 $ (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.55 ) $ (0.49 ) $ (0.53 ) $ (0.47 ) $ (0.53 ) (0.47 ) Note: Common stock options that were anti-dilutive and not included in diluted earnings per common share for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 were 848 and 890 respectively. 44 New Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which amends guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is principles based guidance that can be applied to all contracts with customers, enhancing comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions and capital markets. The core principle of the guidance is that entities should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The guidance details the steps entities should apply to achieve the core principle. In August 2015, the FASB issued an amendment to defer the effective date for all entities by one year. For public entities, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the option of using either a full or modified retrospective approach in applying this standard. During fiscal 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued four additional updates which further clarify the guidance provided in ASU 2014-09. We have undertaken a detailed analysis of our various contracts with customers and revenue streams, including engaging a third party to assist management in evaluating the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company’s management has elected to adopt the amendments in ASU 2014-09 on a modified retrospective basis; whereas any cumulative effect of adopting this guidance will be recognized as an adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings. Prior periods will not be retrospectively adjusted. The Company does not expect the implementation of ASU 2014-09 and the related amendments to have a material impact on the timing, amount or characterization of revenue recognized by the Company. For most of our revenue, we will continue to recognize revenue when title to the goods transfers to the customer, as this is generally when control transfers to the customer. While we expect the impact of these new standards will be immaterial to our financial statements, upon adoption, we will include the expanded disclosures required by the new standards. Pursuant to the Company’s adoption of the standard it anticipates expanding its disclosures in the consolidated financial statements for revenue recognition, assets and liabilities relating to contracts with customers, the nature of the Company’s performance obligations and the manner by which the Company determines and allocates transaction prices and variable consideration to its performance obligations and the significant judgments inherent in its revenue recognition policies. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (“ASU 2015-11”), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015- 11 requires inventory within the scope of the ASU (e.g., first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost) to be measured using the lower of cost and net realizable value. Inventory excluded from the scope of the ASU (i.e., last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method) will continue to be measured at the lower of cost or market. The ASU also amends some of the other guidance in Topic 330, “Inventory,” to more clearly articulate the requirements for the measurement and disclosure of inventory. However, those amendments are not intended to result in any changes to current practice. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 in fiscal 2018 and there was no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases. ASU 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Upon adoption, the Company expects that the amounts recognized for the ROU asset and lease liability in the balance sheets may be material. 45 In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, a new accounting standard update intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including: income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. Specifically, the ASU 2016-09 requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes) be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), introducing a new element of volatility to the provision for income taxes. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on May 28, 2017. Effective with the adoption of the ASU all share-based awards continue to be accounted for as equity awards, excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation expense are reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) as a component of the provision for income taxes on a prospective basis, excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation expense are classified as an operating activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows on a prospective basis and the Company has elected to continue to estimate expected forfeitures over the course of a vesting period. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 had no impact on the retained earnings, other components of equity or net assets as of the beginning of the period of adoption. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 introduces a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses, to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. The estimate of expected credit losses will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU also expands the disclosure requirements to enable users of financial statements to understand the entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating expected credit losses. For public business entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the guidance is to be applied using the modified-retrospective approach. Earlier adoption is permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 ("ASU 2016-15"), Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The guidance permits entities to reclassify tax effects stranded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income as a result of tax reform to retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in annual and interim periods and can be applied retrospectively or in the period of adoption. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements. In May 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, regarding the accounting implications of the recently issued Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). This standard is effective immediately. The update clarifies that in a company’s financial statements that include the reporting period in which the Act was enacted, the company must first reflect the income tax effects of the Act in which the accounting under GAAP is complete. These amounts would not be provisional amounts. The company would also report provisional amounts for those specific income tax effects for which the accounting under GAAP is incomplete but a reasonable estimate can be determined. The Company has recorded a provisional amount which it believes is a reasonable estimate of the effects of the Act on the Company’s financial statements as of June 2, 2018. Technical corrections or other forthcoming guidance could change how the Company interprets provisions of the Act, which may impact its effective tax rate and could affect its deferred tax assets, tax positions and/or its tax liabilities. 46 4. ACQUISITION On June 15, 2015, Richardson Electronics, Ltd (“the Company”), acquired certain assets of International Medical Equipment and Services, Inc. (“IMES”), for a purchase price of $12.2 million. This includes the purchase of inventory, receivables, fixed assets and certain other assets of the Company. The Company did not acquire any liabilities of IMES. The total consideration paid excludes transaction costs. IMES, based in South Carolina, provides reliable, cost-saving solutions worldwide for major brands of CT and MRI equipment. This acquisition positions Richardson Healthcare to provide cost effective diagnostic imaging replacement parts and training to hospitals, diagnostic imaging centers, medical institutions and independent service organizations. IMES offers an extensive selection of replacement parts, as well as an interactive training center, on-site test bays and experienced technicians who provide 24/7 customer support. Replacement parts are readily available and triple tested to provide peace of mind when uptime is critical. IMES core operations have remained in South Carolina. Richardson Healthcare plans to expand IMES’ replacement parts and training offerings geographically to leverage the Company’s global infrastructure. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, IMES opened up their first foreign location in Amsterdam. The consideration paid by the Company to IMES at closing was $12.2 million in cash. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired at the date of the closing of the acquisition (in thousands): Accounts receivable Inventories Property, plant and equipment Goodwill Other intangibles Net assets acquired $ $ 737 1,420 230 6,332 3,490 12,209 Intangible assets include trade names with an estimated life of 3 years for $0.6 million, customer relationships with an estimated life of 20 years for $2.5 million, non-compete agreements with an estimated life of 5 years for $0.2 million and technology with an estimated life of 10 years for $0.2 million. Goodwill recognized represents value the Company expects to be created by combining the operations of IMES with the Company’s operations, including the expansion into markets within existing business segments and geographic regions, access to new customers and potential cost savings and synergies. Goodwill related to the acquisition is deductible for tax purposes. In connection with the acquisition of IMES, the Company also entered into an Employment, Non-Disclosure and Non- Compete Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) with Lee A. McIntyre III as the Company’s Executive Vice President, IMES. During the term of his employment, Mr. McIntyre will earn an annual base salary of $300,000. In addition to his base salary, he will be entitled to an annual bonus equal to 20% of the EBITDA of IMES provided that the EBITDA of the business is at least $2.0 million inclusive of the bonus payment. The annual bonus payment will terminate after five years. For fiscal 2018, Lee McIntyre did not receive a bonus as the minimum EBITDA needed was not achieved. Effective June 2, 2018, the Company and Lee A. McIntyre III amended the Employment Agreement, stating Mr. McIntyre will earn an annual base salary of $150,000. There were no changes to the bonus structure in the Employment Agreement. IMES net sales were $8.2 million, $7.9 million and $7.6 million for fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The gross profit was $3.5 million, $3.7 million and $4.4 million, or 42.3%, 46.5% and 57.2% of net sales during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. 47  5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS On September 12, 2017, the Company received an income tax refund from the State of Illinois of approximately $2.0 million, which included interest earned. The refund was a result of the conclusion of the Illinois amended return related to the sale of the RF, Wireless and Power Division in 2011. A net benefit of $1.5 million, which included $0.5 million of professional fee costs incurred to pursue the refund, was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 in discontinued operations. 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION On June 15, 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for the IMES facility with LDL, LLC. The Executive Vice President of IMES, Lee A. McIntyre III (former owner of IMES), has an ownership interest in LDL, LLC. The lease agreement provides for monthly payments over five years with total future minimum lease payments of $0.3 million. Rental expense related to this lease amounted to $0.1 million for the fiscal years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016. The Company shall be entitled to extend the term of the lease for a period of an additional five years by notifying the landlord in writing of its intention to do so within nine months of the expiration of the initial term. 7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill There was $6.3 million of goodwill reported on our balance sheet at both June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017. The goodwill balance in its entirety relates to our IMES reporting unit that is included in the Healthcare segment. We test goodwill for impairment annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, loss of key personnel or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit. In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 eliminates step 2 from the goodwill impairment test as defined in ASU 2011-08. As amended, the goodwill impairment test will consist of one-step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. An entity may still perform the optional qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. ASU 2017-04 is required to be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 for our fiscal 2018 annual impairment test. On March 4, 2018, our goodwill balance was reviewed for impairment on a qualitative basis. We determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our IMES reporting unit was less than its carrying amount after reviewing the totality of events or circumstances as provided in FASB ASC 350-20-35. Accordingly, the quantitative goodwill impairment test as described in FASB ASC 350-20-35 was performed. We performed the quantitative impairment test using the income method, which is based on a discounted future cash flow approach that uses the significant assumptions of projected revenue, projected operational profit, terminal growth rates and the cost of capital. The Guideline Public Company Method was also included in the goodwill impairment study. 48 The Company engaged a third party to assist with the goodwill impairment testing. Management concluded that the results of our goodwill impairment test as of March 4, 2018 indicated that the value of goodwill attributed to our IMES reporting unit was not impaired due to its fair value exceeded its carrying value. In the three years since the acquisition, the Company has made significant investments in the IMES business, including capital expenditures, new product development and inventory, that are expected to increase IMES’ product offerings and result in increased future sales, operating profits and cash flows. Although we believe our projected future operating results and cash flows and related estimates regarding fair values were based on reasonable assumptions, historically, projected operating results and cash flows have not always been achieved. As of the first day of our fourth quarter, we determined that our IMES reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of its carrying value of at least 8.0%. Factors considered in calculating the fair value of the reporting unit were the historical performance of the reporting unit, forecasted financials for the following ten years and comparable publically held companies. Management’s projections used to estimate cash flows included increasing sales volumes from new product offerings, expanded sales into new geographies, and operational improvements designed to reduce costs. While all product lines are expected to grow, new product offerings are the largest component of the sales growth with more than 50% of future sales projected to be from new product offerings. The Company used a weighted average cost of capital of 19% for these cash flows. Changes in any of the significant assumptions used, including if the Company does not successfully achieve its operating plan, which is largely dependent on sales from new product offerings, can materially affect the expected cash flows, and such impacts could result in a material non-cash impairment charge of goodwill and potentially other long lived assets. Potential events or changes in circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect key assumptions are deterioration in general market conditions or the environment in which the reporting unit or entity operates, an increased competitive environment in which the reporting unit or entity operates or other relevant entity-specific events such as market acceptance of our new CT tubes and other new product offerings, approvals to sell in foreign markets, and changes in management or key personnel. Intangible Assets Intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair market values determined on quoted market prices in active markets, if available, or recognized valuation models. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives and are tested for impairment when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate possible impairment. 49 Our intangible assets represent the fair value for trade name, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and technology acquired in connection with our acquisitions. Intangible assets subject to amortization were as follows (in thousands): Gross Amounts: Trade Name Customer Relationships (1) Non-compete Agreements Technology Total Gross Amounts Accumulated Amortization: Trade Name Customer Relationships Non-compete Agreements Technology Total Accumulated Amortization Net Intangibles June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 $ $ $ $ $ 659 $ 3,408 177 230 4,474 $ 651 $ 617 115 77 1,460 $ 659 3,397 177 230 4,463 441 446 84 51 1,022 3,014 $ 3,441 (1) Change from prior periods reflect impact of foreign currency translation. We determined that intangible assets were not impaired as of June 2, 2018 on the basis that no adverse events or changes in circumstances were identified that could indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable. The amortization expense associated with the intangible assets subject to amortization for the next five years is presented in the following table (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total amortization expense Amortization Expense $ $ 245 257 245 253 246 1,768 3,014 The amortization expense associated with the intangible assets totaled approximately $0.4 million during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. The weighted average number of years of amortization expense remaining is 15.1 years. 50 8. LEASE OBLIGATIONS, OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES We lease certain warehouse and office facilities and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $1.8 million, $1.9 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. Our future lease commitments for minimum rentals, including common area maintenance charges and property taxes during the next five years are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter 9. INCOME TAXES $ Payments 1,629 1,132 792 142 19 76 Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes included the following components (in thousands): United States Foreign Income (loss) before income taxes June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 $ $ (211 ) $ 4,071 3,860 $ (8,150 ) $ 2,034 (6,116 ) $ (7,274 ) 1,054 (6,220 ) The provision for income taxes for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 consisted of the following (in thousands): Current: Federal State Foreign Total current Deferred: Federal State Foreign Total deferred Income tax provision June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 $ $ $ $ $ — $ (12 ) 1,220 1,208 $ 124 $ — 202 326 $ 1,534 $ (117 ) $ 3 1,035 921 $ — $ — (109 ) (109 ) $ 812 $ — 17 441 458 — — 88 88 546 51 The differences between income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 29.2% for fiscal 2018 and 34% for fiscal 2017 and 2016 and the reported income tax provision for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows: Federal statutory rate Effect of: State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit Deemed repatriation tax Foreign income inclusion Foreign taxes at other rates Permanent tax differences Deferred remeasurement Tax reserves Additional U.S. tax on undistributed foreign earnings Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets Return to provision adjustments Closure of foreign audits Other Effective tax rate June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 29.2 % 34.0 % 34.0 % 0.3 (50.0 ) — (0.1 ) 6.7 45.1 3.6 (12.5 ) 15.1 0.1 2.2 — 39.7 % 4.8 — (20.7 ) 1.0 (0.5 ) — 0.9 15.8 (46.6 ) (2.0 ) — — (13.3 )% 4.2 — (0.4 ) 0.6 (0.8 ) — (6.0 ) (32.7 ) (11.4 ) 3.9 — (0.2 ) (8.8 )% Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect continuing operations as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017. Significant components were as follows (in thousands): Deferred tax assets: NOL carryforwards - foreign and domestic Inventory valuations Goodwill Foreign tax credits Severance reserve Foreign capital loss Other Subtotal Valuation allowance - foreign and domestic Net deferred tax assets after valuation allowance Deferred tax liabilities: Accelerated depreciation Tax on undistributed earnings Other Subtotal Net deferred tax assets Supplemental disclosure of deferred tax assets (liabilities) information: Domestic Foreign Total 52 Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 7,883 $ 978 294 465 119 1,143 1,632 12,514 $ (9,148 ) 3,366 $ (2,474 ) $ (274 ) 28 (2,720 ) $ 646 $ 7,394 $ 2,401 $ 9,795 $ 7,870 1,141 325 3,808 227 1,142 2,048 16,561 (8,557 ) 8,004 (1,356 ) (5,738 ) 35 (7,059 ) 945 6,937 2,565 9,502 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted new tax legislation, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). The primary provisions of the Act expected to impact the Company in fiscal 2018 are a reduction to the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and a transition from a worldwide corporate tax system to a territorial tax system. The reduction in the corporate income tax rate requires the Company to remeasure its net deferred tax assets to the new corporate tax rate and the transition to a territorial tax system requires payment of a one-time tax on deemed repatriation of undistributed and previously untaxed non-U.S. earnings. Primarily as a result of those provisions of the Act, the Company recorded a deferred remeasurement impact of approximately $1.6 million, which was fully offset by the valuation allowance movement. Additionally, the estimated deemed earnings repatriation tax, net of available foreign tax credits brought back as part of the deemed repatriation, was $3.5 million. The Company does not anticipate any cash tax payments due to the foreign tax credit carryforwards available to fully offset the provisional deemed repatriation tax. The 21% corporate income tax rate was effective January 1, 2018. Based on the Company’s June 2, 2018 fiscal year end, the U.S. statutory income tax rate for fiscal 2018 will be approximately 29.2%. The tax impact recorded for the Act for fiscal 2018 is provisional as outlined below and may change. The Company completed a preliminary assessment of earnings that could be repatriated based on reinvestment needs of non-U.S. operations and earnings available for repatriation. The estimated withholding tax that would be incurred from the repatriation of those earnings was included in fiscal 2018 provisional income tax expense. The Company continues to analyze the provisions of the Act addressing the net deferred tax asset remeasurement and its calculations, the deemed earnings repatriation, including the determination of undistributed non-U.S. earnings, and evaluate potential Company actions. In addition, the Company continues to monitor potential legislative action and regulatory interpretations of the Act. Based on the effective date of certain provisions, the Company will be subject to additional requirements of the Act beginning in fiscal 2019. Those provisions include a tax on global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), a tax determined by base erosion and anti-avoidance tax (BEAT) related to certain payments between a U.S. corporation and foreign related entities, a limitation of certain executive compensation, a deduction for foreign derived intangible income (FDII) and interest expense limitations. The Company has not completed its analysis of those provisions and the estimated impact. The Company also has not determined its accounting policy to treat the taxes due on GILTI as a period cost or include in the determination of deferred taxes. In December 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 that allows for a measurement period up to one year after the enactment date of the Act to complete the accounting requirements. The Company will complete the adjustments related to the Act within the allowed period. As of June 2, 2018, we had approximately $3.4 million of net deferred tax assets related to federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, compared to $4.2 million as of May 27, 2017. Net deferred tax assets related to domestic state NOL carryforwards amounted to approximately $3.9 million as of June 2, 2018, compared to $3.0 million as of May 27, 2017. Net deferred tax assets related to foreign NOL carryforwards as of June 2, 2018 totaled approximately $0.6 million with various or indefinite expiration dates. The amount of net deferred tax assets related to foreign NOL carryforwards was $0.7 million as of May 27, 2017. We also have a domestic net deferred tax asset of $0.5 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards as of June 2, 2018, compared to $3.8 million as of May 27, 2017. The changes in balances from prior year are generally due to the transition tax that was part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for which the deemed inclusion on foreign earnings utilized most of the foreign tax credit carryforwards available. We do not have any alternative minimum tax credit carryforward as of June 2, 2018. We have historically determined that undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, to the extent of cash available, will be repatriated to the U.S. We repatriated $21.2 million of foreign cash to our U.S. parent company in fiscal 2018, $17.7 million from our Hong Kong entity and the remainder from our entities in Singapore, Italy and Taiwan. Due to the deemed repatriation tax, the untaxed outside basis difference for which the historic balance has primarily related has been reduced. The deferred tax liability on the outside basis difference is now primarily withholding tax on future dividend distributions. Accordingly, we have reduced the deferred tax liability from $5.7 million in fiscal 2017 to be $0.3 million in fiscal 2018 on foreign earnings of $28.6 million. Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets. A significant component of objective evidence evaluated was the cumulative income or loss incurred in each jurisdiction over the three-year period ended June 2, 2018. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider subjective evidence such as future income projections. We considered other positive evidence in determining the need for a valuation allowance in the U.S. including the repatriation of foreign earnings which we do not consider permanently reinvested in certain of our foreign subsidiaries. The weight of this positive evidence is not sufficient to outweigh other negative evidence in evaluating our need for a valuation allowance in the U.S. jurisdiction. 53 As of June 2, 2018, a valuation allowance of $9.1 million has been established to record only the portion of the deferred tax asset that will more likely than not be realized. There has been an increase in the valuation allowance from May 27, 2017 in the amount of $0.6 million. The valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets in foreign jurisdictions where historical taxable losses have been incurred. We also recorded a valuation allowance for all domestic federal and state net deferred tax assets considering the significant cumulative losses in the U.S. jurisdiction, the reversal of the deferred tax liability for foreign earnings and no forecast of additional U.S. income. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are increased, or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth. Income taxes paid, including foreign estimated tax payments, were $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.7 million, during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world. Generally, years prior to fiscal 2010 are closed for examination under the statute of limitation for U.S. federal, U.S. state and local or non-U.S. tax jurisdictions. We are currently under examination in Thailand (fiscal 2008 through 2011). We are also under examination in the state of Illinois for fiscal years 2014 and 2015. Our primary foreign tax jurisdictions are Germany and the Netherlands. We have tax years open in Germany beginning in fiscal 2015 and the Netherlands beginning in fiscal 2012. The uncertain tax positions from continuing operations as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017 were $0.1 million and $0.0 million, respectively. We record penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax expense line item within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheets. We have not recorded a liability for interest and penalties as of June 2, 2018 or May 27, 2017. It is not expected that there will be a change in the unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of various statutes of limitations within the next 12 months. The following table summarizes the activity related to the unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands): Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period Increase in positions taken in prior period Decrease in positions due to settlements Decrease related to the expiration of statute of limitations Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 $ $ 1,883 $ 138 (1,883 ) — 138 $ 2,000 75 (75 ) (117 ) 1,883 Unrecognized tax benefits for continuing and discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands): Continuing operations Discontinued operations (1) Fiscal Year Ended June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 $ $ 138 $ — 138 $ — 1,883 1,883 (1) Relates to an amended Illinois state income tax return related to the sale of RFPD. 10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Employee Profit Sharing Plan: The employee profit sharing plan is a defined contribution profit sharing plan for employees. The profit sharing plan has a 401(k) provision whereby we match 50% of employee contributions up to 4.0% of pay. Charges to expense for matching contributions to this plan were $0.4 million, $0.0 million and $0.4 million, during fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company suspended the match component for fiscal 2017. 54 11. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION In accordance with ASC 280-10, Segment Reporting, we have identified three reportable segments: PMT, Canvys and Healthcare. PMT combines our core engineered solutions, power grid and microwave tube business with new RF and power technologies. As a manufacturer and authorized distributor, PMT’s strategy is to provide specialized technical expertise and engineered solutions based on our core engineering and manufacturing capabilities. We provide solutions and add value through design-in support, systems integration, prototype design and manufacturing, testing, logistics and aftermarket technical service and repair—all through our existing global infrastructure. PMT’s focus is on products for power, RF and microwave applications for customers in alternative energy, aviation, broadcast, communications, industrial, marine, medical, military, scientific and semiconductor markets. PMT focuses on various applications including broadcast transmission, CO2 laser cutting, diagnostic imaging, dielectric and induction heating, high energy transfer, high voltage switching, plasma, power conversion, radar and radiation oncology. PMT also offers its customers technical services for both microwave and industrial equipment. Canvys provides customized display solutions serving the corporate enterprise, financial, healthcare, industrial and medical original equipment manufacturers markets. Our engineers design, manufacture, source and support a full spectrum of solutions to match the needs of our customers. We offer long term availability and proven custom display solutions that include touch screens, protective panels, custom enclosures, all-in-ones, specialized cabinet finishes and application specific software packages and certification services. Our volume commitments are lower than those of the large display manufacturers, making us the ideal choice for companies with very specific design requirements. We partner with both private label manufacturing companies and leading branded hardware vendors to offer the highest quality display and touch solutions and customized computing platforms. Healthcare manufactures, refurbishes and distributes high value replacement parts for the healthcare market including hospitals, medical centers, asset management companies, independent service organizations and multi-vendor service providers. Products include Diagnostic Imaging replacement parts for CT and MRI systems; replacement CT and MRI tubes; CT service training; MRI coils, cold heads and RF amplifiers; hydrogen thyratrons, klystrons, magnetrons; flat panel detector upgrades; and additional replacement solutions currently under development for the diagnostic imaging service market. Through a combination of newly developed products and partnerships, service offerings and training programs, we believe we can help our customers improve efficiency and deliver better clinical outcomes while lowering the cost of healthcare delivery. The CEO evaluates performance and allocates resources primarily based on the gross profit of each segment. Operating results by segment are summarized in the following table (in thousands): PMT Net Sales Gross Profit Canvys Net Sales Gross Profit Healthcare Net Sales Gross Profit June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 128,296 $ 43,254 104,226 $ 33,382 105,554 33,088 26,683 $ 8,410 20,534 $ 5,752 8,233 $ 3,418 12,112 $ 4,749 23,453 6,017 13,009 5,730 $ $ $ 55 A reconciliation of assets to the relevant consolidated amount is as follows (in thousands): Segment assets Cash and cash equivalents Investments - current Other current assets (1) Net property, plant and equipment Investments - non-current Other assets - non-current deferred income taxes Total assets June 2, 2018 May 27, 2017 90,981 $ 60,465 — 3,830 10,126 — 927 166,329 $ 80,105 55,327 6,429 3,330 8,752 2,419 1,102 157,464 $ $ (1) Other current assets include miscellaneous receivables and prepaid expenses. Assets are not disclosed by reportable segment as the Company does not track assets by reportable segment and certain assets are not specific to any reportable segment. Capital expenditures for our Healthcare segment during fiscal 2018 and 2017 were approximately $1.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. In addition, we also had capital expenditures during fiscal 2018 related to the Company’s ERP system as well as facilities that were not specific to any particular reportable segment and capital expenditures during fiscal 2017 related to the Company’s ERP system that was not specific to any reportable segment. Geographic net sales information is primarily grouped by customer destination into five areas: North America; Asia/Pacific; Europe; Latin America; and Other. Net sales and gross profit by geographic region are summarized in the following table (in thousands): Net Sales North America Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Other (1) Total Gross Profit North America Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Other (1) Total June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 $ $ $ $ 67,662 $ 32,607 53,818 9,123 2 163,212 $ 25,996 $ 10,794 18,071 3,602 (3,381 ) 55,082 $ 55,963 $ 27,997 44,296 8,552 64 136,872 $ 20,597 $ 9,630 14,418 3,250 (4,012 ) 43,883 $ 66,365 24,564 44,634 6,347 106 142,016 23,506 8,212 13,541 2,397 (2,821 ) 44,835 (1) Other includes primarily net sales not allocated to a specific geographical region, unabsorbed value-add costs and other unallocated expenses. Major Customers During fiscal 2018, LAM Research Corporation (“LAM”) individually accounted for 11 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2018. No one customer accounted for more than 10 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2017 or fiscal 2016. LAM sales were included in the PMT segment. 56 We sell our products to customers in diversified industries and perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. Terms are generally on open account, payable net 30 days in North America, and vary throughout Asia/Pacific, Europe and Latin America. Estimates of credit losses are recorded in the financial statements based on monthly reviews of outstanding accounts. Net assets by geographic region are summarized in the following table (in thousands): Net Assets North America Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America Total June 2, 2018 Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2017 May 28, 2016 $ $ 77,857 $ 17,254 37,911 2,159 135,181 $ 62,085 $ 34,990 32,794 2,458 132,327 $ 65,832 42,547 31,495 1,801 141,675 The Company had long-lived assets of $21.2 million as of June 2, 2018 and $19.3 million as of May 27, 2017. The long-lived assets, which include our fixed assets and intangibles, were primarily in the US. There were approximately $1.0 million of long-lived assets that belong to our foreign affiliates as of June 2, 2018 and $1.2 million as of May 27, 2017. The Company had depreciation and amortization expense of $3.0 million, $2.7 million and $2.4 million for fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. The depreciation and amortization, which includes our fixed assets and intangibles, were primarily in the US. Depreciation and amortization expense that belong to our foreign affiliates was approximately $0.3 million for fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016. 12. LITIGATION On December 5, 2017, Steven H. Busch filed a Verified Stockholder Derivative Complaint against Edward J. Richardson, Paul Plante, Jacques Belin, James Benham, Kenneth Halverson, and the Company in the Delaware Court of Chancery, captioned Steven H. Busch v. Edward J. Richardson, et al., C.A. No. 2017-0868-AGB. The lawsuit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors and challenges the decision of a special committee of the Company’s Board to refuse Mr. Busch’s demand that the Company’s Board, among other things, rescind the Company’s May 2013 repurchase of stock from Mr. Richardson and May 2013 and October 2014 repurchases of Company stock from the Richardson Wildlife Foundation. On March 9, 2018, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit that are currently pending. The Company believes the lawsuit to be without merit and that a loss is not probable or estimable based on the information available at the time the financial statements were issued. 13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists; therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. We liquidated our investments in fiscal 2018. Prior to the liquidation of our investments, we held investments that were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Our investments consist of time deposits and CDs, where face value is equal to fair value, and as of May 27, 2017, also equity securities of publicly traded companies for which market prices are readily available. 57 Investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820 as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017 were as follows (in thousands): June 2, 2018 Time deposits/CDs Equity securities Total May 27, 2017 Time deposits/CDs Equity securities Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 $ $ $ $ — $ — — $ 8,226 $ 622 8,848 $ — $ — — $ — $ — — $ — — — — — — 14. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS The following table presents the valuation and qualifying account activity for fiscal years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, (in thousands): Description Year ended June 2, 2018 Allowance for doubtful accounts Inventory provisions Year ended May 27, 2017 Allowance for doubtful accounts Inventory provisions Year ended May 28, 2016 Allowance for doubtful accounts Inventory provisions Balance at beginning of period Charged to expense Deductions Balance at end of period $ $ $ 398 $ 3,456 364 $ 3,380 223 (1) $ 773 (3) (312 ) (2) $ (202 ) (4) 226 (1) $ 456 (3) (192 ) (2) $ (380 ) (4) 283 $ 2,991 228 (1) $ 690 (3) (147 ) (2) $ (301 ) (4) 309 4,027 398 3,456 364 3,380 Notes: (1) (2) (3) (4) Charges to bad debt expense, net of bad debt recoveries. Uncollectible amounts written off, net of recoveries and foreign currency translation. Charges to cost of sales. Included in fiscal 2018 were inventory write-downs of $0.6 million for PMT, $0.1 million for Canvys and $0.1 million for Healthcare. Inventory disposed of or sold, net of foreign currency translation. 58 15. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) Description Fiscal 2018 Net sales Gross profit (Loss) income from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Net (loss) income (Loss) income from continuing operations Common stock - basic Class B common stock - basic Common stock - diluted Class B common stock - diluted Income from discontinued operations Common stock - basic Class B common stock - basic Common stock - diluted Class B common stock - diluted Net (loss) income Common stock - basic Class B common stock - basic Common stock - diluted Class B common stock - diluted Fiscal 2017 Net sales Gross profit Loss from continuing operations Net loss Net loss Common stock - basic Class B common stock - basic Common stock - diluted Class B common stock - diluted First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 36,995 12,148 (112 ) — (112 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) 33,373 10,240 (2,850 ) (2,850 ) (0.23 ) (0.20 ) (0.23 ) (0.20 ) 59 39,082 13,374 172 1,496 1,668 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.12 33,827 10,964 (2,522 ) (2,522 ) (0.20 ) (0.18 ) (0.20 ) (0.18 ) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 41,645 14,067 527 — 527 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 32,313 10,692 (1,431 ) (1,431 ) (0.11 ) (0.10 ) (0.11 ) (0.10 ) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 45,490 15,493 1,739 — 1,739 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.12 37,359 11,987 (125 ) (125 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 ) (0.01 )  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Stockholders Richardson Electronics, Ltd. LaFox, Illinois Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries at June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated August 2, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ BDO USA, LLP We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015. Chicago, Illinois August 2, 2018 60  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Stockholders Richardson Electronics, Ltd. LaFox, Illinois Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited Richardson Electronics, Ltd.’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2018, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of June 2, 2018, and May 27, 2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 2, 2018, and the related notes and our report dated August 2, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ BDO USA, LLP Chicago, Illinois August 2, 2018 61 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Management of the Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of June 2, 2018. Disclosure controls and procedures are intended to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 2, 2018. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2018, based on the framework in the Internal Control- Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 2, 2018. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2018 has been audited by BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 62 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None Results of Operation and Financial Condition and Declaration of Dividend On July 25, 2018, we issued a press release reporting results for our fourth quarter and fiscal year ended June 2, 2018, and the declaration of a cash dividend. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein. 63 ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III Information concerning directors and executive officers of the registrant will be contained in our Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on October 9, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11. Executive Compensation Information concerning executive compensation will be contained in our Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on October 9, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management will be contained in our Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on October 9, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. Equity Compensation Plan Information The following table sets forth information as of June 2, 2018, with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities were authorized for issuance: Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights 1,171,975 Plan Category Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Weighted Average Per Share Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights $ 8.81 Holders Total 23,564 (1) $ $ 1,195,539 12.95 (1) 8.89 Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the First Column) 523,917 — 523,917 (1) Options issued in 1987 pursuant to an employment contract with a former officer and director of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions will be contained in our Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on October 9, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Information concerning accountant fees and services will be contained in our Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on October 9, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. 64 ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV (a) Exhibit See Exhibit Index. (b) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules. Our consolidated financial statements being filed as part of this Form 10-K are filed on Item 8 of this Form 10-K. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted. 65 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Signature Title By: /s/ Edward J. Richardson Edward J. Richardson Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President and Director Date August 2, 2018 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ Edward J. Richardson Edward J. Richardson Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer (Principal August 2, 2018 Executive Officer), President and Director /s/ Robert J. Ben Robert J. Ben /s/ Paul J. Plante Paul J. Plante /s/ Jacques Belin Jacques Belin /s/ James Benham James Benham /s/ Kenneth Halverson Kenneth Halverson /s/ Robert Kluge Robert Kluge Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director Director 66 August 2, 2018 August 2, 2018 August 2, 2018 August 2, 2018 August 2, 2018 August 2, 2018 PART IV ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a) List of Documents Filed as a Part of This Report: (1) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 2, 2018 and May 27, 2017. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for each of the three years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years ended June 2, 2018, May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Report of BDO USA, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (2) Index to Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or is not applicable or required. 67 Exhibit Number 2(a) 2(b) 2(c) Description Purchase Agreement between the Company and International Medical Equipment & Services, Inc. dated June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 17, 2015). Acquisition Agreement, dated October 1, 2010, among Richardson Electronics, Ltd., certain subsidiaries of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1, 2010). Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement, dated February 28, 2011, between Richardson Electronics, Ltd., and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(q)(i) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2011). 3(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Annex III of the Proxy Statement filed August 22, 2014. 3(b) Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2017). 10(a) † Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 23, 2011). 10(a)(i) † Amendment to the Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex II to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2014). 10(e) † Amended and Restated Edward J. Richardson Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on August 30, 2012). 10(f) † Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2005). 10(g) † Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, by and between the Company and Wendy Diddell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-113568, filed June 14, 2004). 10(g)(i) † First Amendment to Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement, dated May 31, 2007, by and between the Company and Wendy Diddell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2007). 10(h) † Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement, dated October 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Kathleen Dvorak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2007). 10(j) † Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement dated June 26, 2014, by and between the Company and Gregory J. Peloquin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 27, 2014). 10(k) † Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement issued under the Richardson Electronics, Ltd. Employees’ 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008). 68 Exhibit Number Description 10(p) † Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement between the Company and Lee A. McIntyre III dated June 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 17, 2015). 10(q) † Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Ben dated as of August 4, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 7, 2015. 10(r) † Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan. 10(s) † Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award for Employees Pursuant to the Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2011 Long- Term Incentive Plan. 10(t) † Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award for Consultants Pursuant to the Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan. 10(u) † Amendment to the Employment, Nondisclosure and Non-Compete Agreement between the Company and Lee A. McIntyre III dated June 15, 2015. 14 21 Corporate Code of Conduct (incorporated by reference to and Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2012). Subsidiaries of the Company. 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - BDO USA, LLP. 31.1 Certification of Edward J. Richardson pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed pursuant to Part I). 31.2 Certification of Robert J. Ben pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed pursuant to Part I). 32 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed pursuant to Part I). 99.1 Press release, dated July 25, 2018. 101 The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended June 2, 2018, filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Audited Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Audited Consolidated Statement of Stockholder’s Equity and (v) Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. † Executive Compensation Plan or Agreement 69 Richardson Electronics 10-K Exhibit 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY Richardson Electronics Pty Limited Richardson Electronics do Brasil Ltda. Richardson Electronics Canada, Ltd. Richardson Electronics Trading (China) Co., Ltd. Australia Brazil Canada China Richardson Powerlink MEA United Kingdom Richardson Electronique SAS Richardson Electronics GmbH France Germany Richardson Electronics Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong Richardson Electronics India Private Limited Aviv-Richardson Ltd. Richardson Electronics S.R.L. Richardson Electronics Japan K.K. Richardson Electronics Korea Limited Richardson Electronics S.A. de C.V. Richardson Electronics Benelux B.V. Richardson Electronics Netherlands B.V. Richardson Electronics Global Holdings BV Richardson Electronics Pte. Ltd. Richardson Electronics Iberica S.A. Richardson Electronics Nordic AB Richardson Electronics (Thailand) Limited Richardson Electronics Limited Richardson International, Inc. India Israel Italy Japan Korea Mexico Netherlands Netherlands Netherlands Singapore Spain Sweden Thailand United Kingdom United States Richardson Electronics 10-K Richardson Electronics, Ltd. LaFox, Illinois Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Exhibit 23.1 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 2- 89888 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-36475 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 33-54745 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-02865 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-03965 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-04071 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-04457 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-04767 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-66215 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-76897 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-70914 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-115955 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-120032 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-129828 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-60092 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-146878 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-146879 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-182907 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Number 333-206044 on Form S-8 of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. of our reports dated August 2, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Richardson Electronics, Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. BDO USA, LLP Chicago, Illinois August 2, 2018 Richardson Electronics 10-K CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Exhibit 31.1 I, Edward J. Richardson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 2, 2018 Signature: /s/ Edward J. Richardson Edward J. Richardson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Richardson Electronics 10-K Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert J. Ben, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) b) c) d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) b) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 2, 2018 Signature: /s/ Robert J. Ben Robert J. Ben Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer Richardson Electronics 10-K Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Richardson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Edward J. Richardson Edward J. Richardson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer August 2, 2018 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Ben, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company /s/ Robert J. Ben Robert J. Ben Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer August 2, 2018 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above