More annual reports from Siemens Energy:
2023 ReportC O R P O R A T E
D I R E C T O R Y
Directors
Paul Chapman
Will Robinson
Peter Bewick
Jonathan Hronsky
Non-Executive Chairman
Managing Director
Exploration Director
Non-Executive Director
Company Secretaries
Kevin Hart
Dan Travers
Principal and Registered Office
Level 7, 600 Murray Street
West Perth, Western Australia 6005
Telephone (08) 9486 9455
Facsimilie (08) 9486 8366
Web www.enrl.com.au
Auditor
Crowe Horwath Perth
Level 5, 45 St Georges Terrace
Perth, Western Australia 6000
Share Registry
Security Transfer Registrars Pty Ltd
770 Canning Highway
Applecross, Western Australia 6153
Telephone (08) 9315 2333
Facsimilie (08) 9315 2233
Stock Exchange Listing
The Company’s shares are quoted on the Australian
Securities Exchange. The home exchange is Perth,
Western Australia.
ASX Code
ENR – Ordinary shares
Company Information
The Company was incorporated and registered under
the Corporations Act 2001 in Western Australia on 30
June 2004 and became a public company on 26 May
2005. The Company is domiciled in Australia.
C O N T E N T S
Letter from the Chairman & Managing Director
Exploration Review
Summary of Tenements
Directors’ Report
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other
Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
Directors’ Declaration
Independent Auditor’s Report
ASX Additional Information
1-2
3-14
15
16 - 26
27
28
29
30
31
32 - 63
64
65 - 66
67 - 69
E N C O U N T E R R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D
1
L E T T E R F R O M T H E C H A I R M A N
A N D M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R
Dear Fellow Shareholder,
I am pleased to present the 2016 Annual Report for Encounter Resources Ltd (“Encounter”). A number of important
developments have occurred over the last year in our expanding exploration portfolio in Western Australia.
This time a year ago, the Lookout Rocks copper project was a sound exploration concept with no prior exploration. It
was essentially a blank sheet with a compelling structural address. Over the past year Lookout Rocks has advanced
from an early stage, grassroots concept through to the successful intersection of zones of up to 1% Cu in disseminated
sulphide mineralisation in our first diamond drill hole at the prospect.
Importantly, this copper-cobalt mineralisation is hosted by black, reduced carbonaceous sediments, located directly
above an oxidised “red bed” stratigraphic unit - a stratigraphic position similar to that of many major copper deposits of
the Zambian Copperbelt. This is the first time that this style of mineralisation has been identified within the project and,
as such, has promising regional exploration implications.
Encounter has now amalgamated the Lookout Rocks and Fishhook Copper prospects. These two prospects combined
contain an interpreted 50km of strike of the stratigraphic contact position that hosts the “first reductant” copper sulphide
mineralisation intersected at Lookout Rocks. While continuing with the planned exploration, we are also actively
pursuing a new partner to advance the combined Lookout Rocks/Fishhook prospect.
Our corporate strategy is to share exploration risk at appropriate points as this approach maximises exploration upside
for shareholders while minimising financial demands upon them.
Drilling at the Millennium zinc prospect, completed in conjunction with our joint venture partner Hampton Hill Mining
(ASX:HHM), continues to reveal the potential of this greenfield zinc discovery. The large scale mineral system
discovered at Millennium is over 3km long and is depth extensive. The processes to produce high tenor zinc
mineralisation have been established and multiple zinc mineralisation styles have been discovered. In essence the
drilling completed to date has established the sort of footprint you would expect to find associated with a major zinc
deposit. These sort of exploration opportunities are rare and there is a dearth of new quality zinc developments around
the globe. Finding the best parts of the sizable zinc system discovered at Millennium is a key goal in the upcoming year.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ANNUAL REPORT 20162
L E T T E R F R O M T H E C H A I R M A N
A N D M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R
In addition, Encounter continues to take advantage of our strategic and operational advantages in the Paterson region
to build our quality portfolio. With this in mind, back in early 2014, we secured the Telfer West gold project. The Telfer
West tenement was recently granted and a review of historical exploration results has been illuminating. This review has
identified a large, high quality, gold exploration project. The context of the opportunity is important:
• Telfer West contains a dome of prospective stratigraphy similar to the host units at Telfer;
• The Egg Prospect contains several areas of high grade gold mineralisation within a substantial volume
of stockwork style gold mineralisation; and
• Telfer West is sparsely drill tested, particularly at depths below 100 metres, with the most recent
diamond drill program completed by Newmont in 1989.
Telfer West is an exciting new addition to the project portfolio in the Paterson region and is characteristic of the
exploration opportunities that continue to be generated by the Encounter technical team. First drilling at Telfer West is
scheduled to commence in November 2016.
Encounter remains one of the most dedicated and active greenfield explorers in Australia. We are focused on generating
value for our shareholders through leading edge greenfield exploration for new Tier 1 mineral assets in favourable mining
jurisdictions like Australia.
Encounter provides high quality access to large scale copper, zinc and gold exploration in a region that has
demonstrated the capacity to produce major mineral deposits. We are encouraged by the recent increased focus on the
Paterson region in WA. The renewed exploration activity in the region appears to be driven by the performance of the
Telfer gold/copper mine; the recent acquisition of the Nifty copper mine; and expanded exploration efforts by a number
of major multinational and junior companies.
Encounter is disciplined in its approach to capital management and we are steadfast in our commitment to systematic
frontier exploration that can create enduring value for our shareholders. Our exploration plans remain well funded and,
importantly, we have an extremely capable and experienced team that is dedicated to realising the vast potential of our
project portfolio.
In closing, we would like to thank our employees, earn-in partners, suppliers and other business partners. We also
would take this opportunity to thank our fellow shareholders for your ongoing support.
Yours sincerely
Paul Chapman
Will Robinson
Chairman
Managing Director
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
E X P L O R A T I O N R E V I E W
3
PATERSON PROVINCE
YENEENA PROJECT
•
100% Encounter - E45/2500, E45/2502, E45/2503, E45/2657, E45/2658, E45/2805, E45/2806, E45/3768,
E45/4091, E45/4230 and E45/4408
•
90% Encounter / 10% HHM - E45/2501, E45/2561 and the four eastern sub-blocks of E45/2500 with HHM
earning up to 25%
• Paterson Gold projects: E45/4613, E45/4564, ELA45/4757, ELA45/4758
Yeneena covers a 1,900km2
of granted exploration
licenses in the Paterson
Province of WA located
between the Nifty copper
mine, the Woodie Woodie
manganese mine, the Telfer
gold-copper mine and the
Kintyre uranium
deposit (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Yeneena tenements: Projects and Earn-In areas with major regional faults
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ANNUAL REPORT 20164
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
2015/16 Exploration Highlights:
• Large scale mineral system discovered at Millennium that is now over 3km long and is depth extensive. The
processes to produce very high tenor zinc mineralisation have been established and multiple zinc mineralisation
styles have been established. A two hole diamond drill program was completed in July 2016. This drilling has
confirmed that the area of shale hosted zinc-lead mineralisation extends at least 400m further south-east than
previously known and the system remains open.
• Lookout Rocks copper prospect was advanced from an early stage, grassroots concept through to the
successful intersection of narrow zones of disseminated copper sulphide mineralisation, up to 1% Cu, in the
first diamond drill hole at the prospect. Importantly, this copper-cobalt mineralisation is hosted by black,
reduced carbonaceous sediments, located directly above an oxidised “red bed” stratigraphic unit, a stratigraphic
position similar to that of many major copper deposits of the Zambian Copperbelt. This is the first time that this
style of mineralisation has been identified within the project and, as such, has promising regional exploration
implications.
• Drilling at the Aria IOCG style prospect intersected a hematite-altered, polymictic breccia with zones of weakly
disseminated chalcopyrite. The hole was terminated at 400.4m but was left open to be extended to test the
modelled gravity and magnetic anomalies identified in surveys completed by Encounter.
• A three hole diamond program was completed at BM1-BM7 testing discrete gravity targets associated with litho-
geochemical anomalies. The drilling intersected additional low grade copper mineralisation at BM7 but does
not appear to have intersected significant density features as modelled. A review of the drilling and geophysical
models is ongoing.
• Telfer West gold prospect is an exciting new addition to the project portfolio in the Paterson Region. A review
of historical exploration results has identified a large, high quality gold exploration project. Telfer West contains
a dome of prospective stratigraphy similar to the host units at Telfer. The Egg Prospect contains several areas
of high grade gold mineralisation within a substantial volume of stockwork style gold mineralisation. The project
is sparsely drill tested, particularly at depths below 100 metres, with the most recent diamond drill program
completed by Newmont in 1989.
During 2015/16 Encounter exploration activities at Yeneena included:
• 5,950m of diamond drilling (14 holes)
• 3,180m of RC drilling (16 holes)
• 3,440m of aircore drilling
• Detailed ground gravity surveys at Aria, Millennium and BM7
• A passive seismic survey at Millennium
• Surface geochemical surveys and mapping at Lookout Rocks and Fishhook
• Two aboriginal heritage surveys
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED5
ZINC
Millennium Zinc Project - Encounter 90% / HHM 10% in E45/2501, E45/2561 and the four eastern sub-blocks of
E45/2500. HHM may earn up to 25% interest.
The Millennium Project is located in the north-east Yeneena (see Figure 1) and is subject to an Earn In Agreement with
Hampton Hill Mining (“HHM”) (refer ASX announcement 23 April 2015).
The Millennium Project lies on the north eastern margin of Yeneena at the intersection of the NNW trending Tabletop
Fault and the NE orientated Tangadee structural lineament. This intersection of two metallogenically important structural
corridors is a first order target and typical of the style of setting that is associated with large scale metal deposits.
Previous aircore and RC drilling by Encounter has defined a +3km long zinc regolith anomaly that remains open to the
SE. Diamond drilling at Millennium has intersected a thick zinc gossan at the contact between a brecciated carbonate
and a thick sequence of carbonaceous shales of the Broadhurst Formation. Previous assay results from the gossan
include, (refer ASX announcement 9 July 2015):
• 38.7m @ 0.9% Zn in EPT2201 from 255.8m; and
• 91.8m @ 1.6% Zn in EPT2203 from 344.4m
High tenor zinc sulphide mineralisation, in the form of sphalerite, has been intersected below the gossanous unit and
returned assays of, (refer ASX announcements 12 January 2015 and 13 December 2013):
• 0.7m @ 36.7% Zn in EPT1854 from 430m; and
• 7m @ 4.8% Zn in EPT 2198 from 233m.
Three high priority target zones have been identified for follow up (see Figure 3):
1. Target Zone Central – large untested target area south-east of the strongly mineralised gossan intersection
EPT2260
2. Target Zone South-East - interpreted zone of coherent zinc sulphide mineralisation including EPT2198 (7m @
4.8% Zn) that is open to the south-east
3. Target Zone North West – high-grade zinc sulphide mineralisation intersected in EPT1854 (0.7m @ 36.7% Zn)
that remains open downdip and along strike to the north and west.
A two hole diamond drill program was completed at Millennium in July 2016. Drilling has confirmed that the area of
shale hosted zinc-lead mineralisation extends at least 400m further south-east than previously known and the system
remains open.
The Company was successful with its application for WA Government EIS co-funding (up to A$150,000) for a future
diamond drill program at Millennium Deeps targeting shale hosted zinc sulphide mineralisation. This EIS co funded
program is scheduled to commence in October 2016.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
6
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
Figure 2: Drill hole collar location – Millennium
Figure 3: Drill hole long section (B – B’) – Millennium Shale-Carbonate contact intersections only. June 2016 diamond hole in blue
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED7
COPPER
BM1–BM7 Copper Project
A 14km long copper system, discovered and wholly owned by Encounter, that contains high grade Cu sulphide
mineralisation at BM7 and a coherent zone of near surface Cu oxide mineralisation at BM1.
A cover corrected gravity model was produced over 6km of the BM1-BM7 copper trend in the March 2016 quarter. The
model highlighted three new, previously untested density anomalies (see Figure 4). The gravity anomalies at BM7, BM7
East and BM1 are situated along strike of bedrock geochemical alteration anomalies (see Figure 4).
A three hole diamond program was completed in June 2016 testing these discrete gravity targets. The drilling
intersected additional low grade copper sulphide mineralisation at BM7, however, the results of the down hole logging of
the holes at BM1 and BM7 East indicate that the drilling has not intersected significant density features as modelled. A
review of the drilling and geophysical modelling is ongoing.
Figure 4: BM1-BM7 cover corrected gravity image (residual filter
applied)
Lookout Rocks Project
Lookout Rocks includes four tenements (~450km2) of highly prospective exploration ground located in the north-west
of Yeneena. Exploration completed at Lookout Rocks during 2015/16 was fully funded pursuant to a farm in agreement
with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Antofagasta plc (refer ASX announcement 30 July 2015).
The two hole diamond program at Lookout Rocks South was completed in June 2016. The drilling successfully
intersected narrow zones of disseminated copper sulphide mineralization, up to 1% Cu, at the targeted “first reductant”
position. This copper-cobalt mineralisation is hosted by black, reduced carbonaceous sediments, located directly above
an oxidised “red bed” stratigraphic unit, a stratigraphic position similar to that of many major copper deposits of the
Zambian Copperbelt.
ANNUAL REPORT 20168
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
This first diamond hole has confirmed the targeted
mineralisation model at Lookout Rocks, focused at a
stratigraphic contact “first reductant” interface (see
photos 1 and 2). Surface mapping indicates that this
stratigraphic contact, which is the focus of the copper-cobalt
mineralisation, is relatively flat and extends laterally over a
large part of the Lookout Rocks Project. Accordingly, this
result has potentially enhanced the scale and near surface
explorability of the opportunity and, as such, has promising
regional exploration implications (refer ASX announcement 28
July 2016).
Subsequent to the end of the financial year Antofagasta
elected not to continue to sole fund exploration at the
Lookout Rocks Copper Project. As such the earn-in
agreement has been terminated and the Lookout Rocks
copper project reverts back 100%, unencumbered to
Encounter. The Company will be continuing with the planned
exploration program at Lookout Rocks with diamond drilling
to commence in September/October 2016.
The company has taken this opportunity to amalgamate the
Lookout Rocks and Fishhook Copper prospects. These
two prospects combined contain an interpreted 50km of
strike of the stratigraphic contact position that hosts the
“first reductant” copper sulphide mineralisation intersected
at Lookout Rocks. The Company will actively pursue a new
partner to advance the combined Lookout Rocks/Fishhook
prospect.
Photo 1: Disseminated chalcopyrite in carbonaceous shale
EPT2282 ~259.5m downhole (1.0%Cu)
Core width ~60mm
Photo 2: Example of “Red Bed” oxidized sediments
EPT2282 ~320m downhole
Core width ~60mm
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED9
Aria
A single diamond drill hole (PADD002A) was completed at the Aria Prospect by a previous explorer under the WA
Government EIS program. This drill hole was located to test the northern margin of a discrete magnetic anomaly within
the GSWA regional magnetic dataset (Figure 5). The drill hole intersected a hematite altered, polymictic breccia from
the start of diamond core at 84.7m to the end of hole (650.1m). Zones of weakly disseminated chalcopyrite and bornite
(copper sulphide minerals) were identified in the drill core from approximately 120m to the end of the hole.
A detailed ground gravity survey was completed at Aria in September 2015. The survey was designed to define any
density anomalies adjacent to the hematite-altered breccia intercepted in PADD002A, with any resultant anomalies
potentially outlining zones of more intense hematite alteration. It has been noted in IOCG deposits that more intense
hematite alteration typically has a close spatial relationship to the strongest copper mineralisation.
The gravity survey outlined a discrete density anomaly located on the margin of the previously identified magnetic
anomaly, with this anomaly also being located to the south of drill hole PADD002A (see Figure 5 inset).
Diamond drill hole EPT2276 was designed to test the discrete density anomaly located on the margin of the previously
identified magnetic anomaly. EPT2276 was completed in October 2015 to a depth of 400.4m and intersected a
hematite-altered, polymictic breccia similar to PADD002A with occasional blebs of chalcopyrite noted in the last 50m of
the hole. EPT2276 was terminated at 400.4m but the hole was left open to be extended to test the modelled gravity or
magnetic anomalies identified at Aria.
Figure 5: Lookout Rocks Project - Aria Prospect - Magnetics TMI
Photo 3: EPT2276 113.7m to 121.0m – Hematite-altered, polymictic breccia
containing clasts of felsic porphyry, gneiss and mafic igneous rocks
1 0
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
GOLD
Over recent years Encounter has continued to add to its strategic ground holding in the Yeneena region including the
acquisition of the Dora and Telfer West gold-copper projects.
Telfer West (100% Encounter)
Background
Telfer West is located 25km north-west of Newcrest’s major gold-copper operation at Telfer (Figure 1). Historical
exploration at Telfer West was conducted by WMC and Newmont from 1983-1993 targeting gold mineralisation in a
similar geological setting to that of Telfer.
The Telfer West Exploration licence E45/4613 (100% Encounter) has now been granted and covers an area of
approximately 121km2. Encounter has recently flown a detailed airborne magnetic survey over the project. This
survey, together with the high resolution aerial photography and historic mapping has confirmed an 8km by 5km
domal formation (Figures 7 & 8) at Telfer West. The domal structure has a core of Isdell Formation overlain by the Malu
Formation, Telfer Formation and sediments of the Puntapunta Formation. These geological units are the main hosts of
gold-copper mineralisation at Telfer. The north-eastern limb of the dome is outcropping and was the focus of historical
exploration in the 1980s. Importantly, the south-western limb of the dome and the northern fold nose extends under
cover and are largely untested.
Historical Gold Mineralisation at Telfer West
Historical exploration completed by WMC and Newmont focused mostly on the outcropping, north-eastern limb of
Malu Formation that forms a north-west trending ridge within the project area (Figure 8). This drilling was predominantly
shallow surface geochemical drilling and in total only 18 diamond drill holes have been drilled over the 8km long trend
of the dome. The shallow RAB and RC drilling totalled 351 holes with only 3 of these holes exceeding 100m depth, 26
holes drilled to a depth between 65 and 100m, 68 holes drilled between depths of 25 and 65m and the remaining 254
holes drilled to less than 25m depth.
The majority of the 18 diamond drill holes focused on testing magnetic anomalies in the southern part of the dome
where strong copper anomalism was identified (Figure 7). The limited remaining diamond drilling was designed to test
areas of surface geochemical and geophysical anomalism in the northern part of the project area (Figure 7 and 8). These
diamond drill holes intersected gold mineralisation including zones of broad, low grade gold-copper-arsenic anomalism
and also narrow bands of high grade gold mineralisation. Only 5 of the 18 diamond holes were drilled deeper than 150m
and several holes ended in gold anomalism.
The review of historical exploration data is continuing. However, an area of immediate focus that warrants near term
follow up is the Egg Prospect, located on the north-eastern limb of the dome at Telfer West. Four diamond holes were
drilled at the Egg Prospect in the period 1986 to 1989 with three of these diamond holes drilled on a single section
(Figure 9). Two of the three drill holes are of particular interest:
• Drill hole LHS86-9 was drilled in a south-west direction, perpendicular to interpreted stratigraphy. This hole was
abandoned at 78.3m due to mechanical failure but ended in 5.3m @ 1.44g/t gold from 73m to EOH.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED1 1
• A follow up hole LHS88-1 was drilled in a north-east direction and as such is interpreted to be drilled down the
stratigraphy. However, this hole intersected a broad zone of low grade stockwork mineralisation of 117.7m @
0.25g/t gold from 156m to EOH and included several narrow zones of high grade gold mineralisation:
• 0.7m @ 4.92g/t gold from 61.5m
• 0.13m @ 12.5g/t gold from 95.07m
• 0.3m @ 10.7g/t gold from 156.6m
• 0.8m @ 7.91g/t gold from 163.7m incl. 0.2m @ 21.7g/t gold from 163.7m and
• 0.2m @ 7.23g/t gold from 183.8m
The fourth hole at Egg (LHS86-8) was drilled approximately 100m to the north-west and parallel to LHS 86-9. This 140m
deep hole was not extensively sampled but did return an intersection of 5m @ 1.57g/t gold from 81m including 1m @
5.63g/t from 81m.
It is interpreted that this historical drilling at the Egg prospect has identified a substantial volume of stockwork style gold
mineralisation within the Malu Formation (see Photo 4). This mineralisation remains open and untested in all directions
and at depth.
In addition, there are only 2 diamond drill holes that have been drilled north-west of the Egg prospect. Drill hole LHS86-
2 was drilled following up an anomalous surface rock chip sample, collected on the edge of the outcropping Malu
Formation, approximately 2km north-west of the Egg prospect. This drill hole was drilled to a depth of 152.2m and
ended in a broad zone of elevated gold anomalism (0.1 – 0.2 g/t gold).
A further 1.6km to the north-west, a single diamond drill hole, LHS89-6, was drilled to test a magnetic anomaly located
under approximately 60m of cover, along the interpreted fold axis of the dome. This hole was drilled to a depth of 107
metres. The drill hole did not explain the magnetic anomaly however it did intersect a broad zone of gold anomalism
including zones of higher grade gold including:
• 8.7m @ 0.41g/t gold from 66m
• 0.8m @ 6.49g/t gold from 98.2m
• 3.0m @ 0.23g/t gold from 104m to EOH
In conclusion, the review of the historical exploration at Telfer West has identified a large, high quality gold exploration
project. The context of the opportunity is important:
• Telfer West contains a mostly untested dome of prospective stratigraphy similar to the host units at Telfer.
• The Egg Prospect within the Malu Formation contains several areas of high grade gold mineralisation with
anomalism extending for at least 4km to the north-west.
• Telfer West is sparsely drill tested, particularly at depths below 100 metres, with the most recent diamond drill
program completed by Newmont in 1989.
Upcoming Activity
• An IP (induced polarisation) survey is scheduled to commence in October 2016
• A heritage survey scheduled to commence in October 2016
• Diamond drilling scheduled to commence at Telfer West in November 2016
ANNUAL REPORT 20161 2
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
Telfer West Project
E45/4613
(100% ENR)
Telfer Gold-
Copper Mine
Figure 6: Telfer West location map – Google Earth background
25km
Figure 7: Telfer West historical drilling and interpreted geology.
Historical diamond holes (yellow diamonds), all other holes
(black dots). Detailed aeromagnetic background (TMI 1VD
pseudo colour image)
Figure 8: Telfer West airphoto – Historical diamond holes (yellow
diamonds), all other holes (black dots)
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
1 3
Photo 4: Egg Prospect LHS 86-9 from ~65m to EOH (note incomplete
sampling)
Figure 9: Egg Prospect cross section from historical report
Dora E45/4564 (100% Encounter):
The Dora gold-copper tenement, was granted in December 2015 (see Figure 1). The project covers a series of discrete
magnetic anomalies along strike from historical gold occurrences and is located approximately 40km south-east of the
Telfer gold-copper operation.
In June 2016, the Company was successful with its application for WA Government Exploration Incentive Scheme
(“EIS”) co-funding (up to A$150,000) for future drilling at the Dora gold project.
ANNUAL REPORT 20161 4
EXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
S U M M A R Y O F T E N E M E N T S
Figure 10: Yeneena Project Location Plan
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr. Peter Bewick
who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr. Bewick holds shares and options in and
is a full time employee of Encounter Resources Ltd and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of
mineralisation under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australian
Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Bewick consents to the inclusion
in the report of the matters based on the information compiled by him, in the form and context in which it appears.
The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information in
the relevant ASX releases and the form and context of the announcement has not materially changed. The Company
confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Persons findings are presented have not been materially
modified from the original market announcements.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDEXPLORATION REVIEW CONTINUED
S U M M A R Y O F T E N E M E N T S
1 5
TENEMENT INFORMATION
Lease
Lease Name
Project Name
E45/2500
E45/2501
E45/2502
E45/2503
E45/2561
E45/2657
E45/2658
E45/2805
E45/2806
E45/4564
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Yeneena
Area
km2
163.4
Managing Company
Encounter
Interest
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
90-100%*
Paterson
Paterson
41.4
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
90%*
Paterson
200.5
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Paterson
19.1
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Paterson
86
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
90%*
Paterson
222.8
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Paterson
171.7
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Paterson
171.6
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Paterson
63.7
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
Dora
Paterson Cu/Au
194.2
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
E45/4613
Telfer West
Paterson Cu/Au
121.4
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
ELA45/4730
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
82.9
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
ELA45/4757
East Telfer
Paterson Cu/Au
12.8
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
ELA45/4758
East Telfer
Paterson Cu/Au
19.2
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
100%
E45/3768
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
181.5
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
E45/4091
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
136.5
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
E45/4230
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
E45/4408
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
P45/3001
Lookout Rocks
Paterson
ELA80/5045
Phillipson Range
West Arunta
92.4
41.7
0.8
283
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
* Tenement subject to Hampton Hill Mining NL Earn-In Agreement (only includes 4 eastern blocks on E45/2500) see ASX
announcement April 23, 2015
ANNUAL REPORT 20161 6
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T
The Directors present their report on Encounter Resources Limited (the Company) and the entities it controlled (the
Group) at the end of, and during the year ended 30 June 2016.
Directors
The names and details of the Directors of Encounter Resources Limited during the financial year and until the date of this
report are:
Paul Chapman – B.Comm, ACA, Grad. Dip. Tax, MAICD, MAusIMM
Non-Executive Chairman appointed 7 October 2005
Mr Chapman is a chartered accountant with over twenty five years’ experience in the resources sector gained in
Australia and the United States. Mr Chapman has experience across a range of commodity businesses including gold,
nickel, uranium, manganese, bauxite/alumina and oil/gas. Mr Chapman has held managing director and other senior
management roles in public companies of various sizes.
During the last 3 years, Mr Chapman was a director of ASX listed companies Silver Lake Resources Ltd (resigned 30
September 2015), Rex Minerals Limited (resigned 31 December 2013), and Phillips River Mining (resigned 26 March
2014).
Will Robinson – B.Comm, MAusIMM
Managing Director (Executive) appointed 30 June 2004
Mr Robinson is a resources industry commercial and finance specialist with over twenty years’ experience in commercial
management, transaction structuring and negotiation, business strategy development and London Metals Exchange
metals trading. Mr Robinson held various senior commercial positions with WMC in Australia and North America
from 1994 to 2003. Mr Robinson has extensive experience in the sale and distribution of commodities and was Vice
President – Marketing for WMC’s nickel business from 2001 to 2003. Mr Robinson founded Encounter Resources
Limited in 2004 and has overseen the development of the Company as its Managing Director. Mr Robinson is the
President of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC), and an Executive Committee Member of
Uncover – Australian Exploration Geoscience Research.
Peter Bewick – B.Eng (Hons), MAusIMM
Exploration Director (Executive) appointed 7 October 2005
Mr Bewick is an experienced geologist and has held a number of senior mine and exploration geological roles during a
fourteen year career with WMC. These roles include Exploration Manager and Geology Manager of the Kambalda Nickel
Operations, Exploration Manager for St Ives Gold Operation, Exploration Manager for WMC’s Nickel Business Unit
and Exploration Manager for North America based in Denver, Colorado. Whilst at WMC, Mr Bewick gained extensive
experience in project generation for a range of commodities including nickel, gold and bauxite. Mr Bewick has been
associated with a number of brownfields exploration successes at Kambalda and with the greenfield Collurabbie Ni-Cu-
PGE discovery.
Jonathan Hronsky - BAppSci, PhD, MAusIMM, FSEG
Non-executive director appointed 10 May 2007
Dr. Hronsky has more than twenty five years of experience in the mineral exploration industry, primarily focused on
project generation, technical innovation and exploration strategy development. Dr. Hronsky has particular expertise
in targeting for nickel sulfide deposits, but has worked across a diverse range of commodities. His work led to the
discovery of the West Musgrave nickel sulfide province in Western Australia. Dr. Hronsky was most recently Manager-
Strategy & Generative Services for BHP Billiton Mineral Exploration. Prior to that, he was Global Geoscience Leader for
WMC Resources Ltd. He is currently a Director of exploration consulting group Western Mining Services and Chairman
of the board of management of the Centre for Exploration Targeting at the University of Western Australia. During the last
3 years Dr Hronsky has been a director of Cassini Resources Limited (appointed 3 April 2014).
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED1 7
Company Secretaries
Kevin Hart – B.Comm, FCA
Mr Hart is a Chartered Accountant and was appointed to the position of Company Secretary on 4 November 2005.
He has over 20 years experience in accounting and the management and administration of public listed entities in the
mining and exploration industry.
He is currently a partner in an advisory firm, Endeavour Corporate, which specialises in the provision of company
secretarial and accounting services to ASX listed entities.
Dan Travers – BSc (Hons), FCCA
Mr Travers is a Fellow of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants and was appointed to the position of
Joint Company Secretary on 20 November 2008. He is an employee of Endeavour Corporate, which specialises in the
provision of company secretarial and accounting services to ASX listed entities in the mining and exploration industry.
Directors’ Interests
As at the date of this report the Directors’ interests in shares and unlisted options of the Company are as follows:
Director
Directors’ Interests in
Directors’ Interests in
Options vested at the
Ordinary Shares
Unlisted Options
reporting date
P Chapman
W Robinson
P Bewick
J Hronsky
5,707,142
22,275,470
5,209,142
-
-
-
3,000,000
1,000,000
-
-
3,000,000
1,000,000
Included in the Directors’ interests in Unlisted Options, there are 4,000,000 options that are vested and exercisable as at
the date of signing this report.
Directors’ Meetings
The number of meetings of the Company’s Directors held during the year ended 30 June 2016, and the number of
meetings attended by each Director are as follows:
Director
Board of Directors’ Meetings
Held
Attended
P Chapman
W Robinson
P Bewick
J Hronsky
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Principal Activities
The principal activity of the Company during the financial year was mineral exploration in Western Australia.
There were no significant changes in these activities during the financial year.
Results of Operations
The consolidated net (loss)/profit after income tax for the financial year was $(5,803,036) (2015: $523,915 profit).
Included in the consolidated loss for the current year is a write-off of deferred and uncapitalised exploration and joint
venture expenditure totalling $4,635,718 (2015: $555,286).
ANNUAL REPORT 20161 8
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T CONTINU ED
Review of Activities
Exploration
Exploration activities for the financial year have been focussed on the Company’s Yeneena Project in the Paterson
Province of Western Australia.
During the year the Company continued its copper exploration programs at its 100% owned BM1 and BM7 prospects
and at the Lookout Rocks project pursuant to the farm-in agreement with a wholly owned subsidiary of Antofagasta plc.
The Company also continued to carry out exploration pursuant to the farm-in agreement with Hampton Hill NL (HHM)
during the year at the Millennium zinc project.
The Company continued to diversify its exploration portfolio with its acquisition of the Telfer West and Dora gold
prospects, also in the Paterson Province.
Full details of the Company’s exploration activities are available in the Exploration Review in the Annual Report.
Financial Position
At the end of the financial year the Group had $3,684,391 (2015: $1,372,033) in cash and at call deposits. Capitalised
mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure is $16,156,627 (2015: $19,703,415).
Expenditure was principally focused on the exploration for base metals at the Company’s Yeneena Project in the
Paterson Province of Western Australia.
Significant Changes in the State of Affairs
Other than the below, there have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company and Group during or
since the end of the financial year.
On 29th July 2015 the Company’s previous farm-in arrangement with Antofagasta plc was terminated by Antofagasta plc.
On the same date, the Company entered into a separate up to US$6 million earn-in arrangement with Antofagasta plc at
the Lookout Rocks copper prospect within the Yeneena Project.
Options over Unissued Capital
Unlisted Options
As at the date of this report 12,286,429 unissued ordinary shares of the Company are under option as follows:
Number of Options Granted
Exercise Price
1,450,000
750,000
550,000
200,000
595,000
1,250,000
750,000
700,000
5,441,429
600,000
30 cents
39 cents
21 cents
31 cents
22 cents
23 cents
31 cents
16 cents
21 cents
14 cents
All options on issue at the date of this report are vested and exercisable.
Expiry Date
30 November 2016
30 November 2017
31 May 2017
31 January 2018
31 May 2018
27 November 2018
27 November 2019
31 January 2019
30 September 2018
28 February 2020
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED1 9
Options over Unissued Capital (Continued)
During the financial year the Company granted 600,000 unlisted options (2015: 2,800,000) over unissued shares to
employees, directors and consultants of the Company, and 5,441,429 options pursuant to a share placement.
During the year 275,000 options were cancelled (2015: 225,000) on the cessation of employment, and 850,000 options
were cancelled on expiry of the exercise period (2015: 5,375,000).
During the financial year no (2015: Nil) ordinary shares were issued on the exercise of options.
Since the end of the financial year no options have been issued by the Company. No options have been exercised since
the end of the financial year.
Since the end of the financial year no options have been cancelled due to the lapse of exercise period.
Options do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company or any other body corporate.
The holders of unlisted options are not entitled to any voting rights until the options are exercised into ordinary shares.
Issued Capital
Ordinary fully paid shares
Dividends
Number of Shares on Issue
2016
155,644,044
2015
134,543,350
No dividend has been paid since the end of the previous financial year and no dividend is recommended
for the current year.
Matters Subsequent to the End of the Financial Year
Other than the matters below, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of
this report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the
Company to affect substantially the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the
Group in subsequent financial years.
On 2nd September 2016 the Company announced that Antofagasta plc had elected not to continue sole funding the
Lookout Rocks Copper Project, and as such the earn-in agreement had been terminated, with the project reverting
to Encounter Operations 100% and unencumbered. The Company will be seeking a new partner for this large scale,
copper opportunity in this highly prospective Proterozoic Paterson Province.
Likely Developments and Expected Results of Operations
Disclosure of any further information has not been included in this report because, in the reasonable opinion of the
Directors to do so would be likely to prejudice the business activities of the Group and is dependent upon the results of
the future exploration and evaluation.
Environmental Regulation and Performance
The Group holds various exploration licences to regulate its exploration activities in Australia. These licences include
conditions and regulations with respect to the rehabilitation of areas disturbed during the course of its exploration
activities.
So far as the Directors are aware, all exploration activities have been undertaken in compliance with all relevant
environmental regulations.
ANNUAL REPORT 20162 0
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T CONTINU ED
Remuneration Report (Audited)
Remuneration paid to Directors and Officers of the Company is set by reference to such payments made by other ASX
listed companies of a similar size and operating in the mineral exploration industry. In addition, reference is made to the
specific skills and experience of the Directors and Officers.
Details of the nature and amount of remuneration of each Director, and other Key Management Personnel if applicable,
are disclosed annually in the Company’s Annual Report.
Remuneration Committee
The Board has adopted a formal Remuneration Committee Charter which provides a framework for the consideration of
remuneration matters.
The Company does not have a separate remuneration committee and as such all remuneration matters are considered
by the Board as a whole, with no Member deliberating or considering such matter in respect of their own remuneration.
In the absence of a separate Remuneration Committee, the Board is responsible for:
1. Setting remuneration packages for Executive Directors, Non-Executive Directors and other Key Management
Personnel; and
2.
Implementing employee incentive and equity based plans and making awards pursuant to those plans.
Non-Executive Remuneration
The Company’s policy is to remunerate Non-Executive Directors, at rates comparable to other ASX listed companies in
the same industry, for their time, commitment and responsibilities.
Non-Executive Remuneration is not linked to the performance of the Company, however to align Directors’ interests with
shareholders’ interests, remuneration may be provided to Non-Executive Directors in the form of equity based long term
incentives.
1. Fees payable to Non-Executive Directors are set within the aggregate amount approved by shareholders at the
Company’s Annual General Meeting;
2. Non-Executive Directors’ fees are payable in the form of cash and superannuation benefits;
3. Non-Executive superannuation benefits are limited to statutory superannuation entitlements; and
4. Participation in equity based remuneration schemes by Non-Executive Directors is subject to consideration and
approval by the Company’s shareholders.
The maximum Non-Executive Directors fees, payable in aggregate are currently set at $200,000 per annum.
Executive Director and Other Key Management Personnel Remuneration
Executive remuneration consists of base salary, plus other performance incentives to ensure that:
1. Remuneration packages incorporate a balance between fixed and incentive pay, reflecting short and long term
performance objectives appropriate to the Company’s circumstances and objectives; and
2. A proportion of remuneration is structured in a manner to link reward to corporate and individual performances.
Executives are offered a competitive level of base salary at market rates (based on comparable ASX listed companies)
and are reviewed regularly to ensure market competitiveness. To date the Company has not engaged external
remuneration consultants to advise the Board on remuneration matters.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED2 1
Remuneration Report (Continued)
Incentive Plans
The Company provides long term incentives to Directors and Employees pursuant to the Encounter Resources
Employee Share Option Plan, which was last approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on 27
November 2015.
The Board, acting in remuneration matters:
1. Ensures that incentive plans are designed around appropriate and realistic performance targets and provide rewards
when those targets are achieved;
2. Reviews and approves existing incentive plans established for employees; and
3. Approves the administration of the incentive plans, including receiving recommendations for, and the consideration
and approval of grants pursuant to such incentive plans.
Engagement of Non-Executive Directors
Non-Executive Directors conduct their duties under the following terms:
1. A Non-Executive Director may resign from his/her position and thus terminate their contract on written notice to the
Company; and
2. A Non-Executive Director may, following resolution of the Company’s shareholders, be removed before the
expiration of their period of office (if applicable). Payment is made in lieu of any notice period if termination is
initiated by the Company, except where termination is initiated for serious misconduct.
In consideration of the services provided by Dr Jon Hronsky as Non-Executive Director the Company will pay him
$50,000 plus statutory superannuation per annum.
In consideration of the services provided by Mr Paul Chapman as Non-Executive Chairman the Company will pay him
$60,000 plus statutory superannuation per annum.
Messrs Chapman and Hronsky are also entitled to fees for other amounts as the Board determines where they perform
special duties or otherwise perform extra services or make special exertions on behalf of the Company. There were no
such fees paid during the financial year ended 30 June 2016.
Engagement of Executive Directors
The Company has entered into executive service agreements with Mr Will Robinson and Mr Peter Bewick on the
following material terms and conditions:
Mr Robinson’s current service agreement with the Company, in respect of his engagement as Managing Director,
is effective from 23 January 2013. Mr Robinson will receive a base salary of $290,000 per annum plus statutory
superannuation.
Mr Bewick’s current service agreement with the Company, in respect of his engagement as Exploration Director,
is effective from 23 January 2013. Mr Bewick will receive a base salary of $270,000 per annum plus statutory
superannuation.
Messrs Robinson and Bewick may also receive an annual short term performance based bonus which may be
calculated as a percentage of their current base salary, the performance criteria, assessment and timing of which is
negotiated annually with the Non-Executive Directors.
Messrs Robinson and Bewick may, subject to shareholder approval, participate in the Encounter Resources Employee
Share Option Plan and other long term incentive plans adopted by the Board.
ANNUAL REPORT 20162 2
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T CONTINU ED
Remuneration Report (Continued)
Short Term Incentive Payments
Each year, the Non-Executive Directors set the Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) for the Executive Directors. The KPI’s
are chosen to align the reward of the individual Executives to the strategy and performance of the Company.
Performance objectives, which may be financial or non-financial, or a combination of both, are weighted when
calculating the maximum short term incentives payable to Executives. At the end of the year, the Non-Executive
Directors will assess the actual performance of the Executives against the set Performance Objectives. The maximum
amount of the Short Term Incentive, or a lesser amount depending on actual performance achieved is paid to the
Executives as a cash payment.
No Short Term incentives are payable to Executives where it is considered that the actual performance has fallen below
the minimum requirement.
Shareholding Qualifications
The Directors are not required to hold any shares in Encounter Resources under the terms of the Company’s
constitution.
Group Performance
In considering the Company’s performance, the Board provides the following indices in respect of the current financial
year and previous financial years:
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Profit/(Loss)
for the year
attributable to
shareholders
Closing share
price at 30 June
$(5,803,036)
$523,915
$(748,166)
$(1,566,249)
$(758,706)
$0.13
$0.19
$0.20
$0.16
$0.18
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED2 3
Remuneration Report (Continued)
Group Performance (Continued)
As an exploration company the Board does not consider the profit/(loss) attributable to shareholders as one of the
performance indicators when implementing Short Term Incentive Payments. In addition to technical exploration success,
the Board considers the effective management of safety, environmental and operational matters and successful
management of the Company’s farm-in arrangements, the acquisition and consolidation of high quality landholdings in
the Paterson Province, as more appropriate indicators of management performance for the 2016 financial period.
Remuneration Disclosures
The Key Management Personnel of the Company have been identified as:
Mr Paul Chapman
Non-Executive Chairman
Mr Will Robinson
Managing Director
Mr Peter Bewick
Exploration Director
Dr Jon Hronsky
Non-Executive Director
The details of the remuneration of each Director and member of Key Management Personnel of the Company is as
follows:
30 June 2016
Short Term
Post
Employment
Other Long
Term
Base Salary
Short Term
Superannuation
Value of
$
Incentive $
Contributions $
Options $
Total $
Paul Chapman
Will Robinson
Peter Bewick
Jon Hronsky
Total
60,000
227,352
227,250
50,000
564,602
-
39,875
37,125
-
77,000
5,700
25,387
25,116
4,750
60,953
-
-
-
-
-
65,700
292,614
289,491
54,750
702,555
30 June 2015
Short Term
Post
Employment
Other Long
Term
Base Salary $
Short Term
Superannuation
Value of
Incentive $
Contributions $
Options $
Total $
Paul Chapman
60,000
Will Robinson
Peter Bewick
Jon Hronsky
Total
271,596
260,654
50,000
642,250
-
36,250
33,750
-
70,000
5,700
29,245
27,968
4,750
67,663
-
-
111,097
36,289
147,386
65,700
337,091
433,469
91,039
927,299
Value of
Options as
Proportion of
Remuneration
%
-
-
-
-
Value of
Options as
Proportion of
Remuneration
%
-
-
25.6%
39.9%
ANNUAL REPORT 20162 4
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T CONTINU ED
Remuneration Report (Continued)
Remuneration Disclosures (Continued)
Details of Performance Related Remuneration
During the period, short term incentive payments were paid to the executive directors as follows:
Will Robinson
Peter Bewick
Short term incentive payments - cash bonuses paid
2015/16 financial year
2014/15 financial year
$39,875
$37,125
$36,250
$33,750
Performance indicators for the 2015/16 financial year included corporate management, project and operational
performance (including safety and environmental management, successful management of the Company’s farm-in
arrangements, cash flow management and results of exploration activity) and share price performance.
Options Granted as Remuneration
During the financial year ended 30 June 2016 no options were granted to Directors or Key Management Personnel of the
Company (2015: 2,000,000).
The fair value of options issued as remuneration is allocated to the relevant vesting period of the options. Options are
provided at no cost to the recipients.
No options were exercised by Key Management Personnel during the financial year.
Exercise of Options Granted as Remuneration
During the year, no ordinary shares were issued in respect of the exercise of options previously granted as remuneration
to Directors or Key Management Personnel of the Company.
Equity instrument disclosures relating to key management personnel
Option holdings
Key Management Personnel have the following interests in unlisted options over unissued shares of the Company.
2016
Name
Balance at start
of the year
Received during
the year as
remuneration
Other changes
during the year1
Balance at the
exercisable at
end of the year
the end of the
Vested and
Directors
P. Chapman
W. Robinson
P. Bewick
J. Hronsky
-
-
3,000,000
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
year
-
-
-
-
3,000,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED2 5
Remuneration Report (Continued)
2015
Name
Balance at start
of the year
Received during
the year as
remuneration
Other changes
during the year1
Balance at the
end of the year
Vested and
exercisable at the
end of the year
Directors
P. Chapman
W. Robinson
P. Bewick
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,000,000
1,500,000
(3,500,000)
J. Hronsky
1 Options lapsing unexercised at the end of the exercise period.
Share holdings
1,300,000
5,000,000
(800,000)
3,000,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
The number of shares in the Company held during the financial year by key management personnel of the Company,
including their related parties are set out below. There were no shares granted during the reporting period as
compensation.
2016
Name
Balance at start of
the year
Received during the
year on exercise of
options
Other changes
Balance at the end
during the year
of the year
Directors
P. Chapman
W. Robinson
P. Bewick
J. Hronsky
5,600,000
22,168,328
5,102,000
-
-
-
-
-
107,142
107,142
107,142
-
5,707,142
22,275,470
5,209,142
-
2015
Name
Balance at start of the
year
Received during the
year on exercise of
options
Other changes during
Balance at the end of
the year
the year
Directors
P. Chapman
W. Robinson
P. Bewick
J. Hronsky
5,600,000
22,168,328
5,102,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,600,000
22,168,328
5,102,000
-
Loans made to key management personnel
No loans were made to key personnel, including personally related entities during the reporting period.
Other transactions with key management personnel
There were no other transactions with key management personnel.
End of Remuneration Report
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ANNUAL REPORT 20162 6
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T CONTINU ED
Officers’ Indemnities and Insurance
During the year the Company paid an insurance premium to insure certain officers of the Company. The officers of the
Company covered by the insurance policy include the Directors named in this report.
The Directors and Officers Liability insurance provides cover against all costs and expenses that may be incurred in
defending civil or criminal proceedings that fall within the scope of the indemnity and that may be brought against the
officers in their capacity as officers of the Company. The insurance policy does not contain details of the premium paid
in respect of individual officers of the Company. Disclosure of the nature of the liability cover and the amount of the
premium is subject to a confidentiality clause under the insurance policy.
The Company has not provided any insurance for an auditor of the Company.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on
behalf of the Company or Group, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company or Group is a party, for the
purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of those proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company or Group with leave of the Court under
section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Non-audit Services
During the year Crowe Horwath the Company’s auditor, has not performed any other services in addition to their
statutory duties.
Total remuneration paid to auditors during the financial year:
Audit and review of the Company’s financial statements
Other services
Total
2016 $
29,000
-
29,000
2015 $
31,000
-
31,000
The board considers any non-audit services provided during the year by the auditor and satisfies itself that the provision
of any non-audit services during the year by the auditor is compatible with, and does not compromise, the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
•
all non-audit services are reviewed by the board to ensure they do not impact the impartiality and objectivity of
the auditor; and
•
the non-audit services provided do not undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as
set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, as they do not involve reviewing or auditing
the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or decision making capacity for the Company, acting as an
advocate for the Company or jointly sharing risks and rewards.
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
A copy of the Auditor’s Independence Declaration as required under Section 307C of the Corporations Act is set out on
the following page.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Dated at Perth this 23rd day of September 2016.
W Robinson
Managing Director
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDAUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
In accordance with the requirements of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, as lead auditor for
the audit of Encounter Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2016, I declare that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
2 7
(a)
no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit; and
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
(b)
In accordance with the requirements of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, as lead auditor for
the audit of Encounter Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2016, I declare that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
(a)
no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit; and
CROWE HORWATH PERTH
(b)
no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
SEAN MCGURK
CROWE HORWATH PERTH
Partner
Signed at Perth, 23 September 2016
SEAN MCGURK
Partner
Signed at Perth, 23 September 2016
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
2 8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2016
2016
Other income
Total income
Employee expenses
Note
5
Employee expenses recharged to exploration
Equity based remuneration expense
19
Non-executive Director’s fees
Gain/(loss) in fair value of financial assets
Depreciation expense
Corporate expenses
Administration and Other expenses
Exploration costs written off and expensed
Profit/(Loss) before income tax
Income tax benefit
Profit/(Loss) after tax
Other comprehensive income
6
6
6
7
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the
year
Earnings per share for loss attributable to the
ordinary equity holders of the Company
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share
29
29
Consolidated
2016 $
329,853
329,853
(1,271,941)
1,075,080
(20,992)
(110,000)
(799,471)
(4,849)
(64,448)
(300,550)
(4,635,718)
(5,803,036)
-
2015 $
1,633,716
1,633,716
(1,609,385)
1,347,908
(187,033)
(110,000)
368,987
(10,329)
(62,953)
(291,710)
(555,286)
523,915
-
523,915
-
523,915
Cents
0.39
0.37
19
(5,803,036)
-
(5,803,036)
Cents
(3.90)
(3.90)
The above consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying notes.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2016
2 9
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other current assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Other financial assets
Property, plant and equipment
Capitalised mineral exploration and evalua-
tion expenditure
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Employee benefits
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
Equity
Issued capital
Accumulated losses
Equity remuneration reserve
Total equity
Note
8
9(a)
9(b)
11
12
13
15
16(a)
16(b)
17
19
19
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
3,684,391
307,282
9,453
4,001,126
768,723
133,693
16,156,627
17,059,043
21,060,169
856,018
123,688
979,706
118,063
118,063
1,097,769
19,962,400
34,401,834
(14,963,883)
524,449
19,962,400
1,372,033
852,086
15,018
2,239,137
1,568,194
204,652
19,703,415
21,476,261
23,715,398
668,552
125,754
794,306
106,569
106,569
900,875
22,814,523
31,471,913
(9,306,923)
649,533
22,814,523
The above consolidated statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
ANNUAL REPORT 20163 0
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR
THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Consolidated
Issued capital
Accumulated
$
losses $
Equity
remuneration
reserve $
Total $
2015
Balance at the start of the financial year
31,113,384
(12,135,860)
2,767,522
21,745,046
Comprehensive income for the financial year
Movement in equity remuneration reserve in
respect of options vested
Transfer to accumulated losses on
cancellation of vested options
Transactions with equity holders in their
capacity as equity holders:
Shares issued (net of costs)
-
-
-
523,915
-
523,915
-
187,033
187,033
2,305,022
(2,305,022)
-
358,529
-
-
358,529
Balance at the end of the financial year
31,471,913
(9,306,923)
649,533
22,814,523
2016
Balance at the start of the financial year
31,471,913
(9,306,923)
649,533
22,814,523
Comprehensive income for the financial
year
Movement in equity remuneration reserve
in respect of options vested
Transfer to accumulated losses on
cancellation of vested options
Transactions with equity holders in their
capacity as equity holders:
Shares issued (net of costs)
-
-
-
(5,803,036)
-
(5,803,036)
-
20,992
20,992
146,076
(146,076)
-
2,929,921
-
-
2,929,921
Balance at the end of the financial year
34,401,834
(14,963,883)
524,449
19,962,400
The above consolidated statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR
THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
3 1
Note
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
Cash flows from operating activities
Sundry income
State Government funded drilling rebate
R&D tax concession tax refund
Interest received
Payments to suppliers and employees
Net cash from/(used in) operating activities
28
Cash flows from investing activities
Contributions received from farm-in partners
Proceeds from disposal of assets
Payments for exploration and evaluation
Payments for plant and equipment
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issue of shares
Payments for share issue costs
Net cash from/(used in) financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held
Cash at the beginning of the financial year
Cash at the end of the financial year
8(a)
-
399,350
536,952
71,652
(646,129)
361,825
2,638,438
-
(3,617,826)
-
(979,388)
2,954,097
(24,176)
2,929,921
2,312,358
1,372,033
3,684,391
14,284
287,018
-
75,929
(792,689)
(415,458)
2,908,246
49,033
(4,968,272)
(34,088)
(2,045,081)
-
(3,971)
(3,971)
(2,464,510)
3,836,543
1,372,033
The above consolidated statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
ANNUAL REPORT 20163 2
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial report are set out below. These policies
have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial report includes financial
statements for the consolidated entity consisting of Encounter Resources Limited and its subsidiaries (“Group”).
(a) Basis of preparation
This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Australian equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS), other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards
Board and the Corporations Act 2001.The Group is a for-profit entity for financial reporting purposes under
Australian Accounting Standards.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest dollar.
The separate financial statements of the parent entity have not been presented within this financial report as
permitted by the Corporations Act 2001.
The financial report of the Group was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of Directors on 23rd
September 2016.
Statement of Compliance
The consolidated financial report of Encounter Resources Limited complies with Australian Accounting Standards,
which include Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS), in their entirety.
Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) in their entirety.
Adoption of New and Revised Standards - Changes in accounting policies on initial application of
accounting standards
In the year ended 30 June 2016, the Group has reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations
issued by the AASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for the current annual reporting period. It has
been determined by the Group that there is no impact, material or otherwise, of the new and revised Standards and
Interpretations on its business and, therefore, no change is necessary to Group accounting policies.
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after 1 July 2016, and have not been applied in preparing these financial statements. None of
these are expected to have a significant effect on the Group.
The Group does not plan to adopt any standards early and the extent of the impact has not been determined.
Reporting basis and conventions
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, and on an accrual basis.
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AIFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting
estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting
policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and
estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in note 3.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
3 3
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(a) Basis of preparation (Continued)
Principles of consolidation
The financial statements of subsidiary companies are included in the consolidated financial statements from the
date control commences until the date control ceases. The financial statements of subsidiary companies are
prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
Inter-entity balances resulting from transactions with or between controlled entities are eliminated in full on
consolidation. Investments in subsidiary companies are accounted for at cost in the individual financial statements
of the Company.
(b) Segment reporting
Operating segments are identified and segment information disclosed, where appropriate, on the basis of internal
reports reviewed by the Company’s board of directors, being the Group’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, as
defined by AASB 8. Adoption of AASB 8 by the Group has not resulted in a redefinition of previously reported
operating segments.
(c) Revenue recognition and receivables
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue
are net of returns, allowances and amounts collectable on behalf of third parties.
Interest income
Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis and is recognised as it accrues.
Option fee income
Revenue is recognised for option fee income at such time that the option fee becoming receivable by the Company
occurs.
Management fee income
Revenue is recognised for management fees from farm-in partners during the period in which the Company
provided the relevant service.
(d)
Income tax
The income tax expense or revenue for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based
on the national income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities
attributable to the temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts
in the financial statements, and to unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary timing differences at the tax rates expected to apply
when the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, based on those tax rates which are enacted or substantially
enacted for each jurisdiction. The relevant tax rates are applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and
taxable temporary differences to measure the deferred tax asset or liability. An exception is made for certain
temporary differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability. No deferred tax asset or liability is
recognised in relation to those timing differences if they arose in a transaction, other than a business combination,
that at the time of the transaction did not affect either accounting profit or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable
that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
3 4
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(d)
Income tax (Continued)
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and
tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent is able to control the timing of the reversal of the
temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and
liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and liabilities
are offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to
realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Current and deferred tax balances attributable to amounts recognised directly in equity are also recognised directly
in equity.
(e) Leases
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified
as operating leases (note 25). Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the
lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight line basis over the period of the lease.
(f)
Impairment of assets
Assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying
amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to
sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which
there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or
groups of assets (cash generating units). Non financial assets, other than goodwill, that suffered an impairment are
reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
(g) Cash and cash equivalents
For cash flow statement presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at
call with financial institutions, other short term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes
in value.
(h) Government grants
Government grants are recognised at fair value where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received
and all grant conditions will be met. Grants relating to expense items are recognised as income over the periods
necessary to match the grant to the costs they are compensating. Grants relating to assets are deducted from the
carrying value of the relevant asset.
Amounts receivable from the Australian Tax Office in respect of research and development tax concession claims
are recognised in the year in which the claim is lodged with the Australian Tax Office. Amounts receivable are
allocated in the financial statements against the corresponding expense or asset in respect of which the research
and development concession claim has arisen.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
3 5
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(i) Fair value estimation
The nominal value less estimated credit adjustments of trade receivables and payables are assumed to
approximate their fair values. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by
discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for
similar financial instruments.
(j) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure
that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the assets. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying
amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits
associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs
and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is calculated using the straight line and diminishing value methods to
allocate their cost, net of residual values, over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
Asset Class
Depreciation Rate
Field Equipment and Vehicles
Office Equipment
33%
33%
Leasehold Improvements
Over the term of the lease
The asset’s residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount
is greater than its estimated recoverable amount (note 1(f)). Gains and losses on disposal are determined by
comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains and losses are included in the income statement.
(k) Mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure
Mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure is written off as incurred or accumulated in respect of each
identifiable area of interest and capitalised. These costs are carried forward only if they relate to an area of interest
for which rights of tenure are current and in respect of which:
•
such costs are expected to be recouped through the successful development and exploitation of the area of
interest, or alternatively by its sale; or
• exploration and/or evaluation activities in the area have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable
assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves and active or significant
operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing.
In the event that an area of interest is abandoned or if the Directors consider the expenditure to be of reduced
value, accumulated costs carried forward are written off in the year in which that assessment is made. A regular
review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs
in relation to that area of interest.
Immediate restoration, rehabilitation and environmental costs necessitated by exploration and evaluation activities
are expensed as incurred and treated as exploration and evaluation expenditure. Exploration activities resulting
in future obligations in respect of restoration costs result in a provision to be made by capitalising the estimated
costs, on a discounted cash basis, of restoration and depreciating over the useful life of the asset. The unwinding
of the effect of the discounting on the provision is recorded as a finance cost in the income statement.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
3 6
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(k) Mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure (Continued)
Farm-in arrangements (in the exploration and evaluation phase)
For exploration and evaluation asset acquisitions (farm-in arrangements) in which the Group has made
arrangements to fund a portion of the selling partner’s (farmor’s) exploration and/or future development
expenditures (carried interests), these expenditures are reflected in the financial statements as and when the
exploration and development work progresses.
Farm-out arrangements (in the exploration and evaluation phase)
The Group does not record any expenditure made by the farmee on its account. It also does not recognise any gain
or loss on its exploration and evaluation farm-out arrangements but redesignates any costs previously capitalised
in relation to the whole interest as relating to the partial interest retained.
Monies received pursuant to farm-in agreements are treated as a liability on receipt and until such time as the
relevant expenditure is incurred.
(l) Joint ventures and joint operations
Joint ventures
A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to
the net assets of the arrangement. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method. Under
the equity method, the share of the profits or losses of the joint venture is recognised in profit or loss and the share
of the movements in equity is recognised in other comprehensive income. Investments in joint ventures are carried
in the statement of financial position at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the Group’s share of net assets of
the joint venture. Goodwill relating to the joint venture is included in the carrying amount of the investment and
is neither amortised nor individually tested for impairment. Income earned from joint venture entities reduce the
carrying amount of the investment.
Joint operations
A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights
to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. The Group has recognised its share
of jointly held assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of joint operations. These have been incorporated in the
financial statements under the appropriate classifications.
Details of these interests are shown in Note 13.
(m) Trade and other payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial
year which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
(n) Employee benefits
Wages, salaries and annual leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, and annual leave expected to be settled within
12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the
reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
3 7
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present
value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting
date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future salaries, experience of
employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted at the corporate bond rate
with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.
Share based payments
Share based compensation payments are made available to Directors and employees.
The fair value of options granted is recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase
in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the employees
become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The fair value at grant date is independently determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into
account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected
price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free rate for the term of the option.
A discount is applied, where appropriate, to reflect the non-marketability and non-transferability of unlisted options,
as the Black-Scholes option pricing model does not incorporate these factors into its valuation.
The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting
conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable.
At each balance sheet date, the entity revises its estimate of the number of options that are expected to become
exercisable. The employee benefit expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate.
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share based payments reserve relating to those options is
transferred to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are
credited to share capital.
Upon the cancellation of options on expiry of the exercise period, or lapsing of vesting conditions, the balance of
the share based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to accumulated losses.
(o)
Issued capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net
of tax, from the proceeds.
(p) Earnings per share
(i) Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the earnings attributable to equity holders of the
Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average
number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary
shares issued during the year.
(ii) Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to
take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive
potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no
consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
3 8
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(q) Goods and services tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred
is not recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the
asset or as a part of the expense.
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST
recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the balance
sheet.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing
activities which are recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flow.
(r) Comparative figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in
presentation for the current financial year.
(s)
Investments and other financial assets
Recognition
When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus in the case of investments not at
fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. The Group determines the classification of
its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each
financial year-end.
All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date, i.e. the date that the
Group commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial
assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or
convention in the marketplace.
(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
A financial asset designated on initial recognition as one to be measured at fair value with fair value changes
in profit and loss is included in the category ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’.
Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near
term. Derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging
instruments. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.
(ii) Held-to-maturity investments
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as
held-to-maturity when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments
included to be held for an undefined period are not included in this classification. Investments that are
intended to be held-to-maturity, such as bonds, are subsequently measured at amortised cost. This cost
is computed as the amount initially recognised minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative
amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initially recognised amount
and the maturity amount. This calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to
the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums
and discounts. For investments carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss
when the investments are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
3 9
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(iii) Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not
quoted in an active market and are stated at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
(iv) Financial liabilities
Non-derivative financial liabilities are recognised at amortised cost, comprising original debt less principal
payments and amortisation.
Fair value hierarchy
The Group’s investments and other financial assets, are measured or disclosed at fair value, using a three level
hierarchy, based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the entire fair value measurement, being:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at
the measurement date
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
(t) Fair value estimation
A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for both
financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or
disclosure purposes based on the following methods:
Investments in equity and debt securities
The fair value of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, held to maturity investments and available for
sale financial assets is determined by reference to their quoted bid price at the reporting date. The fair value of
held to maturity investments is determined for disclosure purposes only. For investments with no active market,
fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market
transactions, reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same, discounted
cash flow analysis and option pricing models.
Trade and other receivables
The fair value of trade and other receivables is estimated as the present value of future cash flows, discounted at
the market rate of interest at the reporting date.
Fair value measurement
When an asset or liability, financial or non-financial, is measured at fair value for recognition or disclosure purposes,
the fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date; and assumes that the transaction will take place
either: in the principal market; or in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market.
Fair value is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability,
assuming they act in their economic best interests. For non-financial assets, the fair value measurement is based
on its highest and best use. Valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient
data are available to measure fair value, are used, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising
the use of unobservable inputs.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
4 0
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 1 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)
(t) Fair value estimation (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified, into three levels, using a fair value hierarchy that reflects
the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. Classifications are reviewed at each reporting date
and transfers between levels are determined based on a reassessment of the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
For recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements, external valuers may be used when internal expertise
is either not available or when the valuation is deemed to be significant. External valuers are selected based on
market knowledge and reputation. Where there is a significant change in fair value of an asset or liability from one
period to another, an analysis is undertaken, which includes a verification of the major inputs applied in the latest
valuation and a comparison, where applicable, with external sources of data.
Note 2 Financial risk management
The Group has exposure to a variety of risks arising from its use of financial instruments. This note presents
information about the Company’s exposure to the specific risks, and the policies and processes for measuring and
managing those risks. The Board of Directors has the overall responsibility for the risk management framework and
has adopted a Risk Management Policy.
(a) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to
meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from transactions with customers and investments.
Trade and other receivables
The nature of the business activity of the Group does not result in trading receivables. The receivables that the
Group does experience through its normal course of business are short term and the most significant recurring by
quantity is receivable from the Australian Taxation Office, the risk of non-recovery of receivables from this source is
considered to be negligible.
Cash deposits
The Directors believe any risk associated with the use of predominantly only one bank is addressed through the use
of at least an A-rated bank as a primary banker and by the holding of a portion of funds on deposit with alternative
A-rated institutions. Except for this matter the Group currently has no significant concentrations of credit risk.
(b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s
approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its
liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking
damage to the Group’s reputation.
The Group manages its liquidity risk by monitoring its cash reserves and forecast spending. Management
is cognisant of the future demands for liquid finance resources to finance the Company’s current and future
operations, and consideration is given to the liquid assets available to the Company before commitment is made to
future expenditure or investment.
(c) Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity
prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market
risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising
any return.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
4 1
Note 2 Financial risk management (Continued)
Interest rate risk
The Group has significant cash assets which may be susceptible to fluctuations in changes in interest rates. Whilst
the Group requires the cash assets to be sufficiently liquid to cover any planned or unforeseen future expenditure,
which prevents the cash assets being committed to long term fixed interest arrangements; the Group does mitigate
potential interest rate risk by entering into short to medium term fixed interest investments.
Equity risk
The Group has exposure to price risk in respect of its holding of ordinary securities in Hampton Hill NL (ASX: HHM),
which has a carrying value at 30 June 2016 of $768,723 (2015: $1,568,194). The investment is classified at fair
value through profit or loss and as such any movement in the market value of HHM shares will be recognised as a
benefit of expense in profit or loss. No specific hedging activities are undertaken into this investment.
Foreign exchange risk
The Group enters into earn-in arrangements that may be denominated in currencies other than Australian Dollars.
Whilst the Group does not recognise assets or liabilities in respect of these earn-in arrangements and accordingly
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will have no direct impact on the Group’s net assets, movements in foreign
exchange may favourably or adversely affect future amounts to be incurred by the Group or its earn-in partners
pursuant to such agreements.
Other than the above, the Group does not have any direct contact with foreign exchange fluctuations other than
their effect on the general economy.
Note 3 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectations of future events that may have a financial impact on the Group and that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances.
Accounting for capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure
The Group’s accounting policy is stated at 1(k). There is some subjectivity involved in the carrying forward as
capitalised or writing off to the income statement exploration and evaluation expenditure, however management
give due consideration to areas of interest on a regular basis and are confident that decisions to either write off or
carry forward such expenditure reflect fairly the prevailing situation.
Accounting for share based payments
The values of amounts recognised in respect of share based payments have been estimated based on the fair
value of the equity instruments granted. Fair values of options issued are estimated by using an appropriate
option pricing model. There are many variables and assumptions used as inputs into the models. If any of these
assumptions or estimates were to change this could have a significant effect on the amounts recognised. See note
18 for details of inputs into option pricing models in respect of options issued during the reporting period.
E N C O U N T E R R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
4 2
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 4 Segment information
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the board
of directors in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. Reportable segments disclosed are
based on aggregating operating segments, where the segments have similar characteristics. The Group’s sole activity
is mineral exploration and resource development wholly within Australia, therefore it has aggregated all operating
segments into the one reportable segment being mineral exploration.
The reportable segment is represented by the primary statements forming these financial statements.
Note 5 Other Income
Operating activities
Earn-in option fee1
Management fees from farm-in partners
Gain on disposal of assets
Interest receivable
Other income
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
-
258,200
-
71,653
-
329,853
1,199,207
321,470
22,826
75,929
14,284
1,633,716
1Fair value of shares received from Hampton Hill NL in relation to an option fee pursuant to an election made under an
earn-in agreement in respect of the Company’s Millennium project. Refer Note 11.
Note 6 Loss for the year
Loss before income tax includes the following specific
benefits/(expenses):
Depreciation:
Office equipment
Total exploration and joint venture costs not capitalised
and written off
(Loss)/Gain in fair value of financial assets1
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
(4,849)
(4,635,718)
(799,471)
(10,329)
(555,286)
368,987
1Adjustment to carrying value of investment in Hampton Hill NL, based on ASX closing price as at 30 June 2016.
The gain/(loss) on investment has been recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss. Refer note 11.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 7 Income tax
a) Income tax expense
Current income tax:
Current income tax charge (benefit)
Current income tax not recognised
Deferred income tax:
Relating to origination and reversal of timing differences
Deferred income tax benefit not recognised
Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the income
statement
b) Reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie
tax payable
Profit/(Loss) from continuing operations before income tax
expense
Tax at the Australian rate of 30%
(2015 – 30%)
Tax effect of permanent differences:
Non-deductible share based payment
Unrealised movement in fair value of financial assets
Exploration costs written off
Capital raising costs claimed
Net deferred tax asset benefit not brought to account
Tax (benefit)/expense
4 3
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
(974,344)
974,344
(1,701,810)
1,701,810
-
(5,803,036)
(1,740,911)
6,298
239,841
1,358,073
(22,116)
158,815
-
(1,223,082)
1,223,082
-
-
-
523,915
157,175
56,110
(110,696)
166,586
(40,974)
(228,201)
-
ANNUAL REPORT 20164 4
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 7 Income tax (Continued)
c) Deferred tax – Balance Sheet
Liabilities
Prepaid expenses
Capitalised exploration expenditure
Assets
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
(2,836)
(4,846,988)
(4,849,824)
(4,505)
(5,911,025)
(5,915,530)
Revenue losses available to offset against future taxable
income
8,952,682
8,302,034
Employee provisions
Accrued expenses
Deductible equity raising costs
Net deferred tax asset not recognised
d) Deferred tax – Income Statement
Liabilities
Prepaid expenses
Capitalised exploration expenditure
Assets
Deductible equity raising costs
Accruals
Increase in tax losses carried forward
Employee provisions
Deferred tax benefit/(expense) movement for the period
not recognised
72,525
13,459
10,144
9,048,810
4,198,986
1,669
1,064,037
(30,830)
13,459
650,648
2,827
1,701,810
69,697
-
40,974
8,412,705
2,497,175
23,587
(264,424)
(23,816)
(56,727)
28,044
20,796
(272,540)
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
4 5
Note 7 Income tax (Continued)
The deferred tax benefit of tax losses not brought to account will only be obtained if:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
The Company derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the benefit from
the tax losses to be realised;
The Company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation; and
No changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Company realising the benefit from the deduction of
the losses.
All unused tax losses of $29,842,273 (2015: $27,673,446) were incurred by Australian entities.
Note 8 Current assets - Cash and cash equivalents
Cash at bank and on hand
Deposits at call
Consolidated
2016 $
3,609,304
75,087
3,684,391
2015 $
948,676
423,357
1,372,033
Reconciliation to cash at the end of the year
(a)
The above figures are reconciled to cash at the end of the financial year as shown in the statement of cash flows as
follows:
Cash and cash equivalents per statement of cash flows
3,684,391
1,372,033
Deposits at call
(b)
Amounts classified as deposits at call are short term deposits depending upon the immediate cash requirements of the
Group, and earn interest at the respective short term interest rates.
(c)
Included in cash and cash equivalents above are amounts pledged as guarantees for the following:
Cash balances not available for use
Office lease bond guarantee (Note 24)
Corporate credit card security deposit (Note 24)
23,000
50,000
73,000
23,000
50,000
73,000
Cash assets include an amount of $104,847 (2015: $59,549) in respect of unspent farm-in contributions received. The
Company has recognised liabilities in the financial statements for unspent farm-in contributions (Note 15).
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
4 6
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 9 Current assets - Receivables
a) Trade and other receivables
Funds due from farm-in partner
R&D tax concession receivable
Other receivables
GST recoverable
b) Other current assets
Prepaid tenement costs
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
14,877
194,218
56,723
41,464
307,282
9,453
223,234
536,952
818
91,082
852,086
15,018
Details of fair value and exposure to interest risk are included at note 20.
Note 10 Non-current assets – Investment in controlled entities
a) Investment in controlled entities
The following amounts represent the respective investments in the share capital of Encounter Resources Limited’s
wholly owned subsidiary companies:
Company
2016 $
2015 $
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
Subsidiary Company
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
Country of
Incorporation
Australia
Australia
Australia
2
1
2
2016
100%
100%
100%
Ownership Interest
2
1
2
2015
100%
100%
100%
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
4 7
Note 10 Non-current assets – Investment in controlled entities (Continued)
• Encounter Operations Pty Ltd was incorporated in Western Australia on 27 November 2006.
• Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd was incorporated in Western Australia on 24 November 2009.
• Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd was incorporated in Western Australia on 23 May 2013.
The ultimate controlling party of the group is Encounter Resources Limited.
b) Loans to controlled entities
The following amounts are payable to the parent company, Encounter Resources Limited at the reporting date:
Encounter Operations Pty Ltd
Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd
Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd
2016 $
20,228,414
318
315,235
2015 $
19,480,080
357
452,574
The loans to Encounter Operations Pty Ltd, Hamelin Resources Pty Ltd and Encounter Yeneena Pty Ltd, to fund explo-
ration activity are non interest bearing. The Directors of Encounter Resources Limited do not intend to call for repayment
within 12 months.
Note 11 Other financial assets – Investments Designated at Fair Value through Profit or
Loss
Balance at the start of the financial year
Investments acquired1
Gain on investments recognised through profit & loss2
Balance at the end of the financial year
Consolidated
2016 $
1,568,194
-
(799,471)
768,723
2015 $
-
1,199,207
368,987
1,568,194
1Fair value of shares received from Hampton Hill NL in relation to an option fee pursuant to an election made under an earn-in agreement in respect
of the Company’s Millennium project. Refer Note 5.
2Adjustment to carrying value of investment in Hampton Hill NL, based on ASX closing price as at 30 June 2016. The gain on investment has been
recognised in the Statement of Profit or Loss. Refer note 6.
3Investments designated at fair value through profit or loss have been measured at level 1 in the fair value measurement hierarchy, refer accounting
policy 1(s).
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
4 8
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 12 Non-current assets – Property, plant and equipment
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
Field equipment
At cost
Accumulated depreciation
Office equipment
At cost
Accumulated depreciation
Leasehold improvements
At cost
Accumulated depreciation
Total
Reconciliation
Field equipment
Net book value at start of the year
Additions
Net book value of assets disposed
Depreciation
Net book value at end of the year
Office equipment
Net book value at start of the year
Depreciation
Net book value at end of the year
898,825
(772,192)
126,633
109,035
(101,975)
7,060
22,137
(22,137)
-
133,693
192,743
-
-
(66,110)
126,633
11,909
(4,849)
7,060
898,825
(706,082)
192,743
109,035
(97,126)
11,909
22,137
(22,137)
-
204,652
282,751
34,088
(26,207)
(97,889)
192,743
22,238
(10,329)
11,909
No items of property, plant and equipment have been pledged as security by the Group.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
4 9
Note 13 Non-current assets – Capitalised mineral exploration and evaluation expenditure
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
In the exploration and evaluation phase
Capitalised exploration costs at the start of the period
Total acquisition and exploration costs for the period (i)
Exploration costs funded by EIS grant
Research and development tax credits (ii)
Total exploration and joint venture costs written off and
expensed for the period
Capitalised exploration costs at the end of the period
19,703,415
1,682,498
(399,350)
(194,218)
(4,635,718)
16,156,627
18,822,002
2,260,668
(287,017)
(536,952)
(555,286)
19,703,415
The recoverability of the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon successful
development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.
The capitalised exploration expenditure written off includes expenditure written off on surrender of, or intended surrender
of tenements for both the group entities and the Group’s proportionate share of the exploration written off by the joint
venture entities.
(i)
Does not include costs incurred by farm-in partners in respect of spend incurred on assets the subject of farm-in
arrangements.
During the financial period, the Company’s farm-in partner Antofagasta Minerals Perth Pty Ltd (see Note 14b)
incurred costs of $1,432,197 (2015: $2,530,551) in respect of exploration and evaluation costs on the
Company’s assets in addition to the amounts stated above.
During the financial period, the Company’s farm-in partner Hampton Hill NL (see Note 14b) incurred costs of
$675,098 (2015: $654,819) in respect of exploration and evaluation costs on the Company’s assets in addition to
the amounts stated above.
(ii)
Amounts receivable pursuant to research and development tax credit (R&D) claims lodged during the period.
The activities the subject of the R&D claims are subject to review by AusIndustry prior to being submitted. R&D
submissions may or may not be subject to future review or audit by AusIndustry or the
Australian Taxation Office.
Note 14 Interest in joint ventures and farm-in arrangements
a) Joint Venture Agreements – Joint Operations
Joint venture agreements may be entered into with third parties.
Assets employed by these joint ventures and the Group’s expenditure in respect of them is brought to account
initially as capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure until a formal joint venture agreement is entered into.
Thereafter, investment in joint ventures is recorded distinctly from capitalised exploration costs incurred on the
company’s 100% owned projects.
The Company was party to the following farm-in arrangements during the financial year ended 30 June 2016:
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
5 0
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 14 Interest in joint ventures and farm-in arrangements (Continued)
b) Farm-in Arrangements
Encounter Yeneena Lookout Rocks Farm-in – Antofagasta Minerals Perth Pty Ltd earning-in
Antofagasta Minerals Perth Pty Ltd has entered into a farm-in and joint venture agreement with the Company in
respect of granted tenements EL45/4091, EL45/4408, EL45/4230 and EL45/3768 that form part of the Company’s
wholly owned Yeneena Project. The agreement covers an area of 450km2 untested exploration ground located in
the north-west of the Yeneena Project.
Significant terms of the farm-in arrangement as follows:
•
2 year initial earn-in phase under which Antofagasta may acquire a 51% joint venture interest by expenditure
of US$2 million and may withdraw at any time subject to a meeting a minimum spend of US$500,000;
•
A second earn-in phase, under which Antofagasta may acquire a further 19% interest by contributing
expenditure of US$4 million within 2 years;
•
In the event of a decision to mine Antofagasta will pay the Company US$3 million.
The farm-in arrangement was terminated on 2 September 2016.
Millennium Zinc Project – Hampton Hill NL (HHM) Earning-in
Encounter Resources Limited has entered into a farm-in agreement with HHM pursuant to which HHM may earn up
to a 25% interest in the Company’s Millennium zinc project, comprising exploration licences EL45/2501, EL45/2561
and four blocks of EL45/2500 in the Paterson Province of Western Australia.
Significant terms of the farm-in arrangement as follows:
•
HHM must spend a minimum of $500,000 on exploration before withdrawal. Upon meeting this minimum
commitment, HHM will acquire a 10% interest in Millennium (“Initial Earn-in Phase”). At that point, HHM (10%)
and Encounter (90%) will form a joint venture.
•
To preserve its initial 10% interest and maintain the right to earn a further 15% interest, HHM may then elect
to sole fund an additional $500,000 (“Second Earn-in Phase”). At completion, HHM will have contributed
$1,000,000 and retained its 10% interest in Millennium. The timing of this additional expenditure will be as
determined by Encounter.
•
HHM may then elect to contribute a further $1,000,000 out of the next $2,000,000 of exploration expenditure
to earn a further 15% interest in Millennium (“Additional Earn-in Phase”). The timing of this expenditure will be
determined by Encounter.
•
At that point, after contribution of a total of $2,000,000 of exploration expenditure, HHM would hold a 25%
and Encounter would hold a 75% interest in the joint venture.
•
Industry standard expenditure contribution or dilution formulas would apply. If a party’s interest is diluted to
less than 10%, that interest would convert to a 1% Net Profit Royalty.
•
Encounter will be the Operator
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
5 1
Note 14 Interest in joint ventures and farm-in arrangements (Continued)
b) Farm-in Arrangements (Continued)
•
If, after the Initial Earn-in Phase, HHM elects to maintain its 10% interest, but forfeit their right to further earn-
in, then at that point, HHM will issue 5% of the issued capital of Hampton to Encounter.
•
If, after the Initial Earn in Phase, HHM elects to proceed with the Second Earn-in Phase, then at that point,
HHM will issue 15% of the issued capital of HHM to Encounter. If this election is made then Encounter will
have the right to appoint a member to the board of HHM.
•
The earn-in and joint venture agreement is conditional upon Encounter obtaining all necessary consents and
approvals to the grant of the earn-in rights to HHM.
As at 30 June 2016 HHM had acquired a 10% interest in the Millennium project pursuant to the Initial Earn-in
Phase, and had elected to proceed with the Second Earn-in Phase. Encounter and HHM are currently in the
Additional Earn-in phase, after which HHM will have earned a 25% interest in the farm-in licences.
The following farm-in agreement was terminated during the financial year with Antofagasta re-focussing its
resources on the Encounter Yeneena Lookout Rocks Farm-in agreement.
Antofagasta Yeneena farm-in – Antofagasta Minerals Perth Pty Ltd earning-in
Antofagasta Minerals Perth Pty Ltd entered into a farm-in and joint venture agreement with the Company in
respect of granted tenements EL45/2658 and EL45/2805 that form part of the Company’s wholly owned Yeneena
Project. The agreement covered an area of 433km2 and comprises the southern extents of the Yeneena Project that
incorporate the BM1, BM7 and BM8 copper prospects.
Significant terms of the farm-in arrangement were as follows:
•
5 year initial earn-in phase under which Antofagasta may acquire a 51% joint venture interest by expenditure
of US$20 million and may withdraw at any time subject to a meeting a minimum spend of US$3 million;
•
A second earn-in phase, should Encounter not elect to contribute to exploration costs under the joint venture,
under which Antofagasta may acquire a further 19% interest by completion of a pre-feasibility study within 4
years of Encounter electing not to contribute;
•
If Antofagasta completes a pre-feasibility study during the second earn-in phase it must pay Encounter US$15
million or contribute US$15 million in lieu of Encounter’s contribution to its proportionate share of feasibility
study costs;
•
If a decision to mine is made subsequent to the completion of a feasibility study and Encounter elects not to
proceed, Antofagasta may acquire Encounter’s interest at 90% of an agreed value determined by independent
expert valuation.
•
Amounts set out in the Earn-in and Joint Venture Agreement are in United States dollars, provided that the
Australia dollar to United States dollar exchange rate published by the Reserve Bank of Australia is between
1.15 and 0.95 (the “Acceptable Range”). If the Exchange Rate is outside the Acceptable Range on the date
cash payment is due, the Exchange Rate will be set at 1.05 United States dollar for each 1 Australian dollar.
On 29th July 2015 this farm-in arrangement was terminated with Encounter retaining a 100% interest in the granted
tenements. The Company will be seeking a new partner for this large scale, copper opportunity in this highly
prospective Proterozoic Paterson Province.
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
5 2
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 15 Current liabilities – Trade and other payables
Unspent farm-in contributions (Note 8c)
Trade payables and accruals
Other payables
Consolidated
2015 $
59,549
573,904
35,099
668,552
2016 $
104,847
727,295
23,876
856,018
Liabilities are not secured over the assets of the Group. Details of fair value and exposure to interest risk are included at
note 20.
Note 16 Employee benefits
a) Current liabilities
Liability for annual leave
b) Non-current liabilities
Liability for long service leave
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
123,688
125,754
118,063
106,569
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
5 3
Note 17 Issued capital
a) Ordinary shares
The Company is a public company limited by shares. The Company was incorporated in Perth, Western Australia.
The Company’s shares are limited whereby the liability of its members is limited to the amount (if any) unpaid on the
shares respectively held by them.
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company in
proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held. On a show of hands every holder of ordinary
shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to
one vote.
Ordinary shares have no par value. There is no limit to the authorised share capital of the Company.
Issue
price
2016 No.
2015 No.
2016 $
2015 $
b) Share capital
Issued share capital
c) Share movements during the year
155,644,044
134,543,350
34,401,834
31,471,913
134,543,350
132,543,350
31,471,913
31,113,384
Balance at the start of the
financial year
Shares issued as
consideration for drilling
services
Shares issued to acquire
exploration assets
Share purchase plan
Share placements
Less share issue costs
Balance at the end of the
financial year
$0.20
$0.15
$0.14
$0.14
-
-
1,250,000
750,000
2,617,836
18,482,858
-
-
-
-
-
-
366,497
2,587,600
(24,176)
250,000
12,500
-
-
(3,971)
155,644,044
134,543,350
34,401,834
31,471,913
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
5 4
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 18 Options and share based payments
The establishment of the Encounter Resources Limited Directors, Officers and Employees Option Plan (‘the Plan”) was
last approved by a resolution at the Annual General Meeting of shareholders of the Company on 27 November 2015.
All eligible Directors, executive officers and employees of Encounter Resources Limited who have been continuously
employed by the Company are eligible to participate in the Plan.
The Plan allows the Company to issue free options to eligible persons. The options can be granted free of charge and
are exercisable at a fixed price in accordance with the Plan.
a) Options issued during the year
During the financial year the Company granted 6,041,429 options over unissued shares (2015: 2,800,000). Of the
6,041,429 options issued, 5,441,429 were issued pursuant to the terms of a share placement completed during the
year.
b) Options exercised during the year
During the financial year the Company issued no shares on the exercise of unlisted employee options (2015: Nil).
c) Options cancelled during the year
During the year 275,000 options (2015: 225,000) were cancelled upon termination of employment. 850,000 options
were cancelled on expiry of exercise period (2015: 5,375,000).
d) Options on issue at the balance date
The number of options outstanding over unissued ordinary shares at 30 June 2016 is 12,286,429 (2015: 7,370,000).
The terms of these options are as follows:
Number of options outstanding
Exercise price
1,450,000
750,000
550,000
200,000
595,000
1,250,000
750,000
700,000
5,441,429
600,000
30 cents
39 cents
21 cents
31 cents
22 cents
23 cents
31 cents
16 cents
21 cents
14 cents
Expiry date
30 November 2016
30 November 2017
31 May 2017
31 January 2018
31 May 2018
27 November 2018
27 November 2019
31 January 2019
30 September 2018
28 February 2020
12,286,429
e) Subsequent to the balance date
No options have been granted subsequent to the balance date and to the date of signing this report.
No options have been exercised subsequent to the balance date to the date of signing this report.
Subsequent to the balance date no options have been cancelled on expiry of the exercise period.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
5 5
Note 18 Options and share based payments (Continued)
Reconciliation of movement of options over unissued shares during the period including weighted average
exercise price (WAEP)
Options outstanding at the start of the year
Options granted during the year
Options exercised during the year
Options cancelled and expired unexercised during the
year
Options outstanding at the end of the year
2016
2015
No.
7,370,000
6,041,429
-
(1,125,000)
12,286,429
WAEP
(cents)
30.2
20.3
-
51.8
38.8
No.
10,170,000
2,800,000
-
WAEP
(cents)
87.8
23.1
-
(5,600,000)
131.3
7,370,000
30.2
Weighted average contractual life
The weighted average contractual life for un-exercised options is 24.5 months (2015: 29.8 months).
Basis and assumptions used in the valuation of options.
The remuneration related options issued during the year were valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation
methodology.
Number
Date granted
of options
granted
Exercise price
(cents)
15 March 2016
600,000
14 cents
Risk free
Expiry date
interest rate
28 February
2020
used
1.91%
Volatility
applied
Value of
Options
96.4%
$20,992
Historical volatility has been used as the basis for determining expected share price volatility.
A discount of 30% in respect of a lack of marketability has been applied to the Black-Scholes option valuation to reflect
the non-negotiability and non-transferability of the unlisted options granted.
No valuation has been undertaken for the options issued attaching to the share placement.
5 6
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 19 Reserves and accumulated losses
Consolidated
2016 $
Equity
2015 $
Accumulated
losses
remuneration
Accumulated losses
reserve (i)
Equity remuneration
reserve (i)
Balance at the beginning of
the year
(9,306,923)
649,533
(12,135,860)
2,767,522
Profit/(Loss) for the period
(5,803,036)
-
523,915
-
Movement in equity
remuneration reserve in
respect of options issued
Transfer to accumulated
losses on cancellation of
options
-
20,992
-
187,033
146,076
(146,076)
2,305,022
(2,305,022)
Balance at the end of the year
(14,963,883)
524,449
(9,306,923)
649,533
(i) The equity remuneration reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options issued and vested but not exercised.
Note 20 Financial instruments
Credit risk
The Directors do not consider that the Group’s financial assets are subject to anything more than a negligible level of
credit risk, and as such no disclosures are made, note 2(a).
Impairment losses
The Directors do not consider that any of the Group’s financial assets are subject to impairment at the reporting date. No
impairment expense or reversal of impairment charge has occurred during the reporting period, other than the write off
of deferred exploration assets at note 13.
Interest rate risk
At the reporting date the interest profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:
Fixed rate instruments
Financial assets
Variable rate instruments
Financial assets
Carrying amount
2016 $
-
2015 $
-
3,684,391
1,372,023
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) equity and profit or
loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant.
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
5 7
Note 20 Financial instruments (Continued)
Interest rate risk (Continued)
Profit or loss $
Equity $
1%
1%
1%
1%
Increase
Decrease
Increase
Decrease
2016
Variable rate instruments
36,844
(36,844)
36,844
(36,844)
2015
Variable rate instruments
13,720
(13,720)
13,720
(13,720)
Liquidity risk
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding
the impact of netting agreements, note 2(b):
Consolidated
2016
Trade and other
payables
2015
Trade and other
payables
Fair values
Carrying
Contractual
amount
cash flows
< 6 months
6-12
1-2
months
years
2-5
years
> 5
years
$
$
$
706,309
706,309
706,309
706,309
706,309
706,309
609,033
609,033
609,033
609,033
609,033
609,033
$
-
-
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
$
-
-
-
-
Fair values versus carrying amounts
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with the carrying amounts shown in the balance sheet are as
follows:
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
Cash and cash equivalents
3,684,391
3,684,391
1,372,033
1,372,033
Carrying amount
Fair value
Carrying amount
Fair value
Other financial assets
768,723
768,723
Trade and other payables
(706,309)
(706,309)
3,746,805
3,746,805
The Group’s policy for recognition of fair values is disclosed at note 1(s).
(609,033)
763,000
(609,033)
763,000
ANNUAL REPORT 20165 8
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 21 Dividends
No dividends were paid or proposed during the financial year ended 30 June 2015 or 30 June 2016.
The Company has no franking credits available as at 30 June 2015 or 30 June 2016.
Note 22 Key management personnel disclosures
(a) Directors and key management personnel
The following persons were directors of Encounter Resources Limited during the financial year:
(i) Chairman – non-executive
Paul Chapman
(ii) Executive directors
Will Robinson, Managing Director
Peter Bewick, Exploration Director
(iii) Non-executive directors
Jonathan Hronsky, Director
There were no other persons employed by or contracted to the Company during the financial year, having
responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company, either directly or indirectly.
(b) Key management personnel compensation
A summary of total compensation paid to key management personnel during the year is as follows:
Total short-term employment benefits
Total share based payments
Total post-employment benefits
Note 23 Remuneration of auditors
Audit and review of the Company’s financial statements
Total
Note 24 Contingencies
2016 $
641,602
-
60,953
702,555
2016 $
29,000
29,000
2015 $
712,250
147,386
67,663
927,299
2015 $
31,000
31,000
(i)
Contingent liabilities
There were no material contingent liabilities not provided for in the financial statements of the Group as at 30
June 2016 or 30 June 2015 other than:
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
5 9
Note 24 Contingencies (Continued)
Yeneena Project Gold Claw-back
Included in the agreement for the Group’s acquisition of the remaining 25% interest of certain licences in the Yeneena
Project is a gold claw-back right in the event of a major discovery of a deposit of minerals dominant in gold, with gold
revenue measured in a mining study equal to or exceeding 65% of total revenue and where a JORC compliant mineral
resources exceeds 4,000,000 ounces of gold or gold equivalent, or is capable of producing at least 200,000 ounces of
gold or gold equivalent per year for 10 years. Under the agreement Barrick (Australia Pacific) Limited retains the right
to regain an interest of between 70 and 100% in the gold discovery at a price of between US$40-100 per ounce, with a
1.5% net smelter royalty to Encounter Resources.
The Yeneena Project Gold Claw-back relates to the following exploration licences: E45/2500, E45/2501, E45/2502,
E45/2503, E45/2561, E45/2657, E45/2658, E45/2805 and E45/2806.
Telfer West Production Royalty
The Group is subject to a production unit royalty of $1 per dry metric tonne of ore mined and sold from licence E45/4613
at its Telfer West Gold Project.
Native Title and Aboriginal Heritage
The Group has Land Access and Mineral Exploration Agreements with Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation in
relation to the tenements comprising the Yeneena Project. Western Desert Lands Aboriginal Corporation ((Jamukurnu-
Yapalikunu/WDLAC) is the Prescribed Body Corporate for the Martu People of the Central Western Desert region in
Western Australia.
Native title claims have been made with respect to areas which include tenements in which the Group has an interest.
The Group is unable to determine the prospects for success or otherwise of the claims and, in any event, whether or not
and to what extent the claims may significantly affect the Group or its projects. Agreement is being or has been reached
with various native title claimants in relation to Aboriginal Heritage issues regarding certain areas in which the Group has
an interest.
Bank guarantees
ANZ Bank has provided unconditional bank guarantees (refer Note 8) as follows:
−
−
$23,000 in relation to the lease over the Company’s office premises at Level 7, 600 Murray Street, West
Perth; and
$50,000 in relation to the Company’s corporate credit card facility.
(ii)
Contingent assets
There were no material contingent assets as at 30 June 2016 or 30 June 2015.
Note 25 Commitments
(a) Exploration
The Group has certain obligations to perform minimum exploration work on mineral leases held. These obligations
may be varied as a result of renegotiations of the terms of the exploration licences or their relinquishment. The
minimum exploration obligations are less than the normal level of exploration expected to be undertaken by the
Group.
As at balance date, total exploration expenditure commitments on tenements held by the Group have not been
provided for in the financial statements and which cover the following twelve month period amount to $1,376,500
(2015: $1,408,500).
The exploration expenditure obligations stated above include amounts that are funded by third parties pursuant to
various farm-in agreements (Note 14).
ANNUAL REPORT 2016
6 0
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 25 Commitments (Continued)
(b) Operating Lease Commitments
The Company has entered into a 2 year lease on its office at Level 7, 600 Murray Street, West Perth on effective
from 1 July 2015 at $46,000 per annum, inclusive of variable outgoings. Operating lease commitments are as
follows:
Due within 1 year
Due after 1 year but not more than 5 years
Due after more than 5 years
2016 $
46,000
-
-
46,000
2015 $
46,000
46,000
-
92,000
(c) Contractual Commitment
There are no material contractual commitments as at 30 June 2016 or 30 June 2015 not otherwise disclosed in the
Financial Statements.
Note 26 Related party transactions
Transactions with Directors during the year are disclosed at Note 22 – Key Management Personnel.
There are no other related party transactions, other than those already disclosed elsewhere in this financial report.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
6 1
Note 27 Events occurring after the balance sheet date
Other than the matters below, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of
this report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the
Company to affect substantially the operations of the Group, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the
Group in subsequent financial years.
On 2nd September 2016 the Company announced that Antofagasta plc had elected not to continue sole funding the
Lookout Rocks Copper Project, and as such the earn-in agreement had been terminated, with the project reverting
to the Company 100% and unencumbered. The Company will be seeking a new partner for this large scale, copper
opportunity in this highly prospective Proterozoic Paterson Province.
Note 28 Reconciliation of loss after tax to net cash inflow from operating activities
Consolidated
Profit/(Loss) from ordinary activities after income tax
Research and development tax credit
Share of management fee to JV not capitalised
Depreciation
Gain on disposal of assets
Exploration cost written off
Share based payments expense
Share based option income revenue
Unrealised gain on investments
Contribution to overheads from farm-in partner
EIS grant funding offset against capitalised exploration
Movement in assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in receivables
Increase/(decrease) in payables
Net cash outflow from operating activities
2016 $
(5,803,036)
536,952
-
4,849
-
4,635,718
20,992
-
799,471
(258,200)
399,350
9,951
15,778
361,825
2015 $
523,915
-
193
10,329
(22,826)
555,286
187,033
(1,199,207)
(368,987)
(321,470)
287,018
(9,610)
(57,132)
(415,458)
ANNUAL REPORT 20166 2
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
Note 29 Earnings per share
Consolidated
a) Basic earnings per share
Profit/(Loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
Company
b) Diluted earnings per share
Profit/(Loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
Company
c) Loss used in calculation of basic and diluted loss
per share
Consolidated profit/(loss) after tax from continuing
operations
d) Weighted average number of shares used as the
denominator
Weighted average number of shares used as the
denominator in calculating basic earnings per share
Weighted average number of shares used as the
denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share
2016
Cents
(3.90)
(3.90)
$
(5,803,036)
No.
149,811,427
149,811,427
2015
Cents
0.39
0.37
$
532,915
No.
133,766,616
141,136,616
At 30 June 2016 the Company has on issue 12,286,429 unlisted options over ordinary shares that are not considered to
be dilutive.
At 30 June 2015 the Company has on issue 7,370,000 unlisted options over ordinary shares that are considered to be
dilutive.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITEDNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016 (CONTINUED)
6 3
30. Parent entity information
Consolidated
2016 $
2015 $
Financial position
Assets
Current assets
Non-current assets
Total Assets
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total Liabilities
NET ASSETS
Equity
Issued Capital
Equity remuneration reserve
Accumulated losses
TOTAL EQUITY
Financial performance
Profit/(Loss) for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income
3,684,484
17,369,086
21,053,570
973,107
118,063
1,091,170
19,962,400
34,401,834
524,449
(14,963,883)
19,962,400
(1,297,465)
-
(1,297,465)
1,512,241
21,705,857
23,218,098
734,756
106,569
841,325
22,376,773
31,471,913
649,533
(9,744,673)
22,376,773
514,868
-
514,868
Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries
No guarantees have been entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiary companies.
Contingent liabilities
For full details of contingencies see Note 24.
Commitments
For full details of commitments see Note 25.
ANNUAL REPORT 20166 4
D I R E C T O R S ’ D E C L A R A T I O N
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
In the opinion of the Directors of Encounter Resources Limited (“the
Company”)
(a)
the financial statements and notes set out on pages 28 to 63 are
in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i)
(ii)
complying with Accounting Standards and the
Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory
professional reporting requirements; and
give a true and fair view of the financial position as at 30
June 2016 and of the performance for the year
ended on that date of the Group.
(b)
(c)
(d)
the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the
Remuneration Report in the Directors Report comply with
Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party
Disclosures, The Corporations Act 2001 and the
Corporations Regulations 2001.
there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be
able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
the financial statements comply with International Financial
Reporting Standards as set out in Note 1.
The Directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A
of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2016.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Signed at Perth this 23rd day of September 2016.
W Robinson
Managing Director
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Encounter Resources Limited, which comprises
the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and
TO THE MEMBERS OF ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the
Report on the Financial Report
consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Encounter Resources Limited, which comprises
to time during the financial year.
the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the
to time during the financial year.
financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the
directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
Auditor’s Responsibility
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the
our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply
financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to
directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s Responsibility
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted
in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the
our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
for our audit opinion.
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
Independence
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
Act 2001.
for our audit opinion.
Independence
Act 2001.
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
6 5
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
TO THE MEMBERS OF ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Encounter Resources Limited, which comprises
the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and
TO THE MEMBERS OF ENCOUNTER RESOURCES LIMITED
the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the
Report on the Financial Report
consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Encounter Resources Limited, which comprises
to time during the financial year.
the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2016, the consolidated statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the
to time during the financial year.
financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the
directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a
Auditor’s Responsibility
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted
and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the
our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply
financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to
directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s Responsibility
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted
in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the
our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
for our audit opinion.
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
Independence
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
Act 2001.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations
Act 2001.
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 6
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
6 6
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion:
(a)
the financial report of Encounter Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act
2001, including:
(i)
giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June
2016 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
Auditor’s Opinion
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001;
(ii)
In our opinion:
and
(a)
(b)
the financial report of Encounter Resources Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act
the consolidated financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards
2001, including:
as disclosed in Note 1.
(i)
(ii)
giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June
2016 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001;
and
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 20 to 25 of the directors’ report for the
year ended 30 June 2016. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and
presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act
2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit
(b)
conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
the consolidated financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards
as disclosed in Note 1.
Auditor’s Opinion
Report on the Remuneration Report
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Encounter Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 20 to 25 of the directors’ report for the
2016 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
year ended 30 June 2016. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and
presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act
2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit
conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
CROWE HORWATH PERTH
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Encounter Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June
2016 complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
SEAN MCGURK
Partner
Signed at Perth, 23 September 2016
CROWE HORWATH PERTH
SEAN MCGURK
Partner
Signed at Perth, 23 September 2016
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
E N C O U N T E R R E S O U R C E S L I M I T E D
Crowe Horwath Perth is a member of Crowe Horwath International, a Swiss verein. Each member of Crowe Horwath is a separate and
independent legal entity. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation other than for the acts or
omissions of financial services licensees.
6 7
A S X A D D I T I O N A L I N F O R M A T I O N
Pursuant to the Listing Requirements of the Australian Securities Exchange, the shareholder information set out below
was applicable as at 19 September 2016.
A.
Distribution of Equity Securities
Analysis of numbers of shareholders by size of holding:
Ordinary Fully Paid Shares
Distribution
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
More than 100,000
Totals
Number of shareholders
Securities held
105
214
138
438
172
1,067
50,123
677,990
1,143,115
16,540,128
137,232,688
155,644,044
There are 255 shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.
B.
Substantial Shareholders
An extract of the Company’s Register of Substantial Shareholders (who hold 5% or more of the issued capital)
is set out below:
Shareholder Name
William Michael Robinson
Eye Investment Fund Limited
Antofagasta Investment Company Limited
Issued Ordinary Shares
Number of shares
% of shares
22,275,470
11,479,028
9,241,931
14.31%
7.38%
5.94%
6 8
A S X A D D I T I O N A L I N F O R M A T I O N
C.
Twenty Largest Shareholders
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted shares are listed below:
Shareholder Name
William Michael Robinson
Merrill Lynch Australia Nominees Pty Ltd
HSBC Custody Nominees Australia Limited
Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd
Sundin Pty Ltd
Stone Poneys Nominees Pty Ltd
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above