Team Inc.
Annual Report 2013

Plain-text annual report

OUR VALUES The Company’s Code of Ethical Conduct can be accessed on our Internet web site at www.teamindustrialservices.com. This Code encompasses our Core Values, which are: Celebrating 40 years of service excellence TEAM, INC. 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Shareholders, This year, we celebrate the founding of our company 40 years ago. While many aspects of our business have changed and evolved over the years, some fundamental requirements for our success have not. Customers choose us, not vice versa. We must earn and affirm our cus- tomers’ trust and confidence in Team with each of our more than 150,000 service opportunities each year by delivering safe, responsive, effec- tive, and efficient solutions. In short, we need to demonstrate that we are an outstanding service company! And, we are. We continued to expand and extend our business during fiscal year 2013. Once again, we achieved double digit total and organic revenue growth of 15% and 11%, respectively, and for the first time in our history total revenues exceeded $700 million. This continued business growth and expansion is consistent with our performance over the past decade. And, as I will discuss in more detail below, we continue to have exciting opportunities across service lines, industries, and geographies to sustain these at- tractive business growth rates for years to come! Business Review and Outlook Total fiscal year 2013 revenues were $714 mil- lion, up $90 million or 15% from the prior year level. Over the past decade, we have enjoyed attractive double digit growth rates in all of our service line categories. This year, our inspec- tion and inspection related services were the primary growth engines for Team with an overall growth rate of 29%. Our very strong growth in inspection related service activity is due both to Quest Integrity Group’s continued service portfolio development and market penetration, as well as the strong growth in Team’s mechanical integrity, tank inspection, and advanced inspection services. Looking forward, we have exciting growth op- portunities in all of our major service lines and geographic regions in which we operate. While we are a market leader or near leader in each of our major service lines, our collective market share is still well below 20% in our highly frag- mented markets. The advantages of our service line breadth and the most extensive branch network in North America, combined with our outstanding service capabilities and perfor- mance, position Team well to capitalize upon our customers’ continuing trend to consolidate their services procurement with larger, more professional service providers, like Team. In addition to these organic growth opportuni- ties, we expect to continue selectively acquiring companies that add new service capabilities and/or extend Team’s geographic and key cus- tomer coverage. In this regard, in the past year, Team purchased three small companies: a North American tank inspection and repair company, a remote digital video inspection company in the Asia Pacific region, and a small valve repair company in Europe. We expect these new capa- bilities to create additional growth opportunities for Team in FY14 and beyond. Fiscal Year 2013 Financial Performance Team’s adjusted earnings in fiscal year 2013 ending May 31, 2013 were $1.55 per fully dilut- ed share. This profit performance was the sec- ond best in Team’s history, but about 5% less than last year’s record level. Operating income before interest and taxes was $55.6 Million, 3% less than the prior year. Operating income margin was 7.8% vs. 9.2% in the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA was $79 million, unchanged from the prior year. Reflecting the strong cash flow generated by the business, net debt (bank debt less cash) decreased by $25 million during the year to about $39 million despite capital expenditures of $26 million and business acqui- sitions totaling nearly $19 million. We were disappointed that our net income did not increase with the increase in our overall business revenue growth this year. The cause of this income shortfall was a decline in our overall gross margin due to operational execu- tion issues and imbalances in our resources and activity levels in specific regions as we adjusted to shifts in the timing and location of major project and turnaround work. We expect Reconciliation of GAAP net income to adjusted net income Twelve Months Ended May 31, Net income available to shareholders Adjustments for non-routine items: 2013 $32,436 2012 $32,911 Fixed asset writedown Legal settlement Venezuelan currency devaluation Total pre-tax adjustments Tax impact of non-routine items Adjusted net income available to common shareholders Adjusted diluted earnings per common share - - 597 597 (221) $32,812 $1.55 1,658 800 - 2,458 (913) $34,456 $1.67 to address these improvement opportunities and return to our historical operating profit margins in the current fiscal year. New Business Group Alignment In July 2013, we aligned our organization into three primary business groups each led by a Business Group President – Inspection and Heat Treating, Mechanical Services, and Quest Integrity Group. In addition to the field service branches and personnel, each business group will also be responsible for its supporting techni- cal, operational, commercial, and manufacturing activities related to their respective service lines. The primary objective behind our decision to move to this new business group structure is to ensure that Team is best positioned to sustain for the long term our very attractive growth opportunities in each of our business areas. By having a full complement of both field service and key technical, commercial, and operational support resources, each group will be well po- sitioned to prioritize, focus on and fully realize its most attractive commercial opportunities. Each business group will be more agile in identifying, pursuing and capturing new opportunities and addressing new threats that may emerge from time to time. The new organizational alignment will inherently link our business resources more closely to our customers’ needs and trends. A second objective of the new alignment is to increase our focus and commitment to the devel- opment of innovative new and improved service capabilities to provide better solutions to current and evolving customer needs. We will be pur- suing new technologies and other new service approaches to increase the value of our services to our customers, to foster competitive distinc- tiveness, and to extend our market penetration. While these changes represent only a fine-tun- ing of our business approach, this new align- ment sharpens our focus on our customers and our opportunities to serve their needs as Team continues its growth toward $1 billion in revenues and beyond. We are all proud of the outstanding sustained high growth performance of Team. I thank my 4,000+ Team colleagues for their vital contri- butions and leadership that is so critical to our great service company. At Team, we all under- stand that we have outstanding opportunities before us, but we still have to earn this business one service opportunity at a time! Thank you for your continuing interest in and support of our company. We look forward to continued success and improvement in the coming year. Philip J. Hawk Chairman & CEO UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Í ‘ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-08604 TEAM, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600, Sugar Land, Texas (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 74-1765729 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 77478 (Zip Code) (281) 331-6154 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Stock, $0.30 par value Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No Í Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes Í No ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes Í No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Í Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ‘ ‘ Non-accelerated filer Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ‘ No Í The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates on November 30, 2012 was approximately $538 million, Accelerated filer Í Smaller reporting company ‘ determined using the closing price of shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on that date of $35.92. For purposes for the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers, the Team, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan and Trust and known 5% or greater beneficial owners have been deemed affiliates. The Registrant had 20,589,041 shares of common stock, par value $0.30, outstanding and 89,569 shares of treasury stock as of July 29, 2013. Documents Incorporated by Reference Portions of our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. These will be filed no later than September 27, 2013. FORM 10-K INDEX PART I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1. BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Narrative Description of Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marketing and Customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seasonality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intellectual Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Available Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 2. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 3. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 4. PART II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER ITEM 6. ITEM 7. MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK . . . CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ITEM 9. AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 10. ITEM 11. ITEM 12. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . . EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND 1 1 1 2 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 10 11 11 12 13 13 15 16 26 26 27 27 27 28 29 29 29 MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR ITEM 14. INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 29 30 30 58 Certain items required in Part III of this Form 10-K can be found in our 2013 Proxy Statement and are incorporated herein by reference. A copy of the 2013 Proxy Statement will be provided, without charge, to any person who receives a copy of this Form 10-K and submits a written request to Team, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600, Sugar Land, Texas, 77478. ITEM 1. BUSINESS General Information PART I Introduction. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Team, Inc.,” “Team,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” are used in this report to refer to Team, Inc., to one or more of our consolidated subsidiaries or to all of them taken as a whole. We are incorporated in the State of Delaware and our company website can be found at www.teamindustrialservices.com. Our corporate headquarters is located at 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600, Sugar Land, Texas, 77478 and our telephone number is (281) 331-6154. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TISI” and our fiscal year ends on May 31 of each calendar year. We are a leading provider of specialty industrial services, including inspection and assessment, required in maintaining high temperature and high pressure piping systems and vessels that are utilized extensively in the refining, petrochemical, power, pipeline and other heavy industries. Through fiscal year 2013, we operated in only one segment—the industrial services segment (see Note 14 to our audited consolidated financial statements). Within the industrial services segment, we were organized as two divisions. Our TCM division provided the services of inspection and assessment and field heat treating. Our TMS division provided the mechanical services listed below. Effective July 1, 2013, we implemented a reorganization of our business divisions and from that date forward we will conduct operations in three segments: Inspection and Heat Treating Services (“IHT”) Group, Mechanical Services (“MS”) Group and Quest Integrity Group. While our services have been realigned in three business groups, we believe our services broadly fall into three different classifications that have unique customer demand drivers: inspection and assessment services, turnaround services, and on-stream services. Inspection and assessment services are offered in both IHT Group and Quest Integrity Group. These services include basic and advanced non-destructive testing, pipeline integrity management services, as well as associated engineering and assessment services. These services can be offered while facilities are running (on- stream) or during facility turnarounds or during new construction or expansion activities. We believe there is a general growth in market demand for these services as improved inspection technologies enable better information about asset reliability to be available to facility owners and operators. Turnaround services are offered in both the IHT Group and in the MS Group (formerly TMS). These services represent project-related services and demand is a function of the number and scope of scheduled and unscheduled facility turnarounds and as well as new industrial facility construction or expansion. Turnaround services includes the field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, heat exchanger repair, and isolation test plugging services that are part of the MS Group and the Field Heat Treating services that are part of the IHT Group. On-stream services are offered by the MS Group and represent the services offered while plants are operating and under pressure. These services include leak repair, fugitive emissions control and hot tapping. We believe demand for on-stream services is a function of the population of the existing infrastructure of operating industrial facilities. 1 Our specific major service categories are: TCM Division • • Inspection and Assessment Field Heat Treating TMS Division • Leak Repair • Fugitive Emissions Control • Hot Tapping • Field Machining • Technical Bolting • Field Valve Repair • Heat Exchanger and Maintenance • Isolation Test Plugging We offer these services in over 125 locations throughout the world. Our industrial services are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. We market our services to companies in a diverse array of heavy industries which include the petrochemical, refining, power, pipeline, steel, pulp and paper industries, as well as municipalities, shipbuilding, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), distributors, and some of the world’s largest engineering and construction firms. Our services are also provided across a broad geographic reach. Narrative Description of Business Inspection and Assessment Services. We offer inspection and evaluation of piping, piping components and equipment to determine the present condition and predict remaining operability. Our inspection services use all the common methods of non-destructive testing, including radiography, ultrasound, magnetic particle and dye penetrant, higher end robotic and newly developed advanced technology systems. Many of the visual inspection programs we provide require specialized training to industry and regulatory standards. Inspection services are marketed to our traditional industrial customer base, and customers outside our traditional customer base, such as the aerospace and automotive industries. Inspection services frequently require industry recognized training and certification processes. We maintain training and certification programs which are designed to meet or exceed industry standards. Through our subsidiary, Quest Integrity Group, LLC (“Quest Integrity”), we offer proprietary, technology- enabled in-line inspections of fired heaters, steam reformers and piping systems primarily in the process, power and pipeline industries. Additionally, Quest Integrity offers engineering assessment services associated with asset integrity, reliability management solutions and pipeline integrity management services. Effective July 1, 2013, with our new business alignment, Quest Integrity Group became a stand-alone business segment of Team. Field Heat Treating Services. Our field heat treating services include electric resistance and gas-fired combustion, primarily utilized by industrial customers to enhance the metallurgical properties of their process piping and equipment. Electric resistance heating is the transfer of high energy power sources through attached heaters to the plant component to preheat weld joints, to remove contaminants and moisture prior to welding and post-weld heat treatments to relieve metal thermal stresses induced by the welding process. Specialty heat treating processes are performed using gas-fired combustion on large pressure vessels for stress relieving, to bake specialty paint coatings and controlled drying of abrasion and temperature resistant refractories. Special high 2 frequency heating, commonly called induction heating, is used to expand metal parts for assembly or disassembly, expansion of large bolting for industrial turbines and stress relieving projects which is cost prohibitive for electric resistance or gas-fired combustion. Leak Repair Services. Our leak repair services consist of on-stream repairs of leaks in pipes, valves, flanges and other parts of piping systems and related equipment. Our on-stream repairs utilize both standard and custom- designed clamps and enclosures for piping systems. We use specially developed techniques, sealants and equipment for repairs. Many of our repairs are furnished as interim measures which allow plant systems to continue operating until more permanent repairs can be made during plant shut downs. Our leak repair services involve inspection of the leak by our field crew who records pertinent information about the faulty part of the system and transmits the information to our engineering department for determination of appropriate repair techniques. Repair materials such as clamps and enclosures are custom designed and manufactured at our ISO- 9001 certified manufacturing centers and delivered to the job site. We maintain an inventory of raw materials and semi-finished clamps and enclosures to reduce the time required to manufacture the finished product. Fugitive Emissions Control Services. We provide fugitive volatile organic compound (“VOC”) emission leak detection services that include identification, monitoring, data management and reporting primarily for the chemical, refining and natural gas processing industries. These services are designed to monitor and record VOC emissions from specific process equipment and piping components as required by environmental regulations and customer requests, typically assisting the customer in enhancing an ongoing maintenance program and/or complying with present and/or future environmental regulations. We provide specialty trained technicians in the use of portable organic chemical analyzers and data loggers to measure potential leaks at designated plant components maintained in customer or our proprietary databases. The measured data is used to prepare standard reports in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and local regulatory requirements. We also provide enhanced custom-designed reports to customer specifications. Hot Tapping Services. Our hot tapping services consist of providing a full range of hot tapping, Line-stop® and Freeze-stop® services with capabilities for up to 48” diameter pipelines. Hot tapping services involve utilizing special equipment to cut a hole in a pressurized pipeline so that a new branch pipe can be connected onto the existing pipeline without interrupting operations. Line-stop® services permit the line to be depressurized downstream so that maintenance work can be performed on the piping system. We typically perform these services by mechanically cutting into the pipeline similar to a hot tap and installing a special plugging device to stop the process flow. The Hi-stop® is a proprietary and patented procedure that allows stopping of the process flow in extreme pressures and temperatures. In some cases, we may use a line freezing procedure by injecting liquid nitrogen into installed special external chambers around the pipe to stop the process flow. Field Machining Services and Technical Bolting Services. We use portable machining equipment to repair or modify machinery, equipment, vessels and piping systems not easily removed from a permanent location. As opposed to conventional machining processes where the work piece rotates and the cutting tool is fixed, in field machining, the work piece remains fixed in position and the cutting tool rotates. Other common descriptions for this service are on-site or in-place machining. Field machining services include flange facing, pipe cutting, line boring, journal turning, drilling and milling. We provide customers technical bolting as a complementary service to field machining during plant shut downs or maintenance activities. These services involve the use of hydraulic or pneumatic equipment with industry standard bolt tightening techniques to achieve reliable and leak-free connections following plant maintenance or expansion projects. Additional services include bolt disassembly and hot bolting, which is a process to remove and replace a bolt as the process is operating. Field Valve Repair Services. We perform on-site repairs to manual and control valves, pressure and safety relief valves as well as specialty valve actuator diagnostics and repair. We are certified and authorized to perform testing and repairs to pressure and safety relief valves by The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors. This certification requires specific procedures, testing and documentation to maintain the safe operation of these essential plant valves. We provide special transportable trailers to the plant site which contain specialty 3 machines to manufacture valve components without removing the valve from the piping system. In addition, we provide preventive maintenance programs for VOC specific valves and valve data management programs. Heat Exchanger and Maintenance Services. We provide turnkey heat exchanger services that allows for blind to blind disassembly and re-assembly. Utilizing our expanding fleet of bundle extraction that allows us to pull and push the tube bundles, as well as field machining and bolting equipment, complete repairs can be made to minimize downtime using one contractor. A complete service allows us to unbolt the exchanger heads and remove the tube bundle for inspection and repair. We are certified by The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors to make welded code repairs when necessary to the many components that make up the assembly. Based on the inspection the bundle tubes can be replaced or plugged. Assembly of the exchanger is documented by our rigid quality control providing documented procedures and final “as assembled” bolted values. Isolation and Test Plug Services. We provide isolation plugs to provide a mechanical block for flammable atmosphere to allow for pipe cutting and welding without having to purge the piping system. The plugs are mechanically expanded to seal on the inside pipe surface and provide a venting system to prevent pressure from building up in the piping system while the system is opened. Test plugs are used to verify the integrity of welded joints by providing sealing surfaces on both sides of the weld and pressuring the void cavity in between. The test plugs allows the customer to comply with American Society of Mechanical Engineers (“ASME”) hydrostatic test requirements for welded joints without having to pressurize the whole system which may result in shutdown of other systems or environmental issues with the test medium. Acquisitions In August 2012, Team’s subsidiary, Quest Integrity, acquired a specialty remote digital video inspection company based in New Zealand for approximately $3.0 million in cash. Based upon the completed purchase price allocation, we have recorded $0.7 million in fixed assets, $1.1 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships, $0.3 million in intangible assets classified as non-compete agreements and $0.9 million in goodwill. In September 2012, Team also acquired the common stock of TCI Services, Inc. (“TCI”) for approximately $23.2 million, of which $16.5 million was cash paid and $6.7 million was deferred payments. TCI is a company based in Oklahoma specializing in the inspection and repair of above ground storage tanks. Based upon the completed purchase price allocation associated with the TCI acquisition, we recorded $4.1 million in net working capital, $2.6 million in fixed assets, $6.7 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships, $1.1 million in intangible assets classified as trade name, $8.6 million in goodwill, $1.0 million in other current liabilities and $5.7 million in other long-term liabilities. The $1.0 million in other current liabilities and $5.7 million in other long-term liabilities represent future consideration to be paid, of which $1.9 million is an estimate of contingent payments to be made based upon the future performance criteria of TCI and the remainder is due in annual installments of $1.0 million beginning in September 2013. The combined unaudited annual revenues for both acquired businesses are approximately $24 million based upon their most recently completed fiscal years, and the total consideration for both was approximately $26 million, subject to adjustments for working capital true-ups and the future performance of the businesses. As a result of the two business acquisitions, we expect to be able to deduct $6.7 million of the goodwill recognized for tax purposes. Of the $8.6 million of TCI goodwill, $1.9 million is contingent consideration and will be considered deductible when paid. In fiscal year 2012, we completed two small acquisitions for a total of $19.4 million which were recorded as $1.2 million in net working capital, $3.0 million in fixed assets, $7.5 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships and $7.7 million in goodwill. Both acquisitions were financed through borrowings on our banking credit facility. We performed purchase price allocations based on our most current assessments of fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. We completed a final valuation report of intangibles and goodwill associated with these transactions during the first half of fiscal year 2013. The final purchase price allocation associated with both of these transactions did not result in material adjustments and, accordingly, no retrospective adjustments were made in the accompanying 2012 financial statements. 4 On November 3, 2010, we purchased Quest Integrity, a privately held advanced inspection services and engineering assessment company. We effectively purchased 95% of Quest Integrity and expect to purchase the remaining 5% in fiscal year 2015 for a purchase consideration based upon the future financial performance of Quest Integrity as defined in the purchase agreement. Future consideration would be payable in unregistered shares of our common stock for an aggregate value of no less than $2.4 million, provided the aggregate value of the consideration does not exceed 20% of our outstanding common stock. Our valuation of the remaining 5% equity of Quest Integrity at the date of acquisition was $4.9 million, which is reflected in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Non-controlling interest.” Information regarding the change in carrying value of the non-controlling interest is set forth below (in thousands): Fair value of non-controlling interest at November 3, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income attributable to non-controlling interest Other comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest . . . . $4,917 474 (7) Carrying value of non-controlling interest at May 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . $5,384 Marketing and Customers Our industrial services are marketed principally by personnel based at our service locations. We believe that these service locations are situated to facilitate timely responses to customer needs with on-call expertise, which is an important feature of selling and providing our services. Our array of integrated services also allows us to benefit from the procurement trends of many of our customers who are seeking reductions in the number of contractors and vendors in their facilities. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues during any of the last three fiscal years. Generally, customers are billed on a time and materials basis, although some work may be performed pursuant to a fixed-price bid. Services are usually performed pursuant to purchase orders issued under written customer agreements. While most purchase orders provide for the performance of a single job, some provide for services to be performed on a run and maintain basis. Substantially all our agreements and contracts may be terminated by either party on short notice. The agreements generally specify the range of services to be performed and the hourly rates for labor. While many contracts cover specific plants or locations, we also enter into multiple-site regional or national contracts which cover multiple plants or locations. Seasonality We experience some seasonal fluctuations. Historically, the refining industry has scheduled plant shutdowns (commonly referred to as “turnarounds”) for the fall and spring seasons. Large turnarounds can significantly impact our revenues. Employees At May 31, 2013, we had approximately 4,200 employees in our worldwide operations. Our employees in the U.S. are predominantly not unionized. Most of our Canadian employees and certain employees outside of North America, primarily Europe, are unionized. There have been no employee work stoppages to date and we believe our relations with our employees and their representative organizations are good. Regulation A significant portion of our business activities are subject to foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations. These regulations are administered by various foreign, federal, state and local health and safety and 5 environmental agencies and authorities, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor and the EPA. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may involve civil and criminal liability. From time to time, we are also subject to a wide range of reporting requirements, certifications and compliance as prescribed by various federal and state governmental agencies that include, but are not limited to, the EPA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Chemical Safety Board, Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration. Expenditures relating to such regulations are made in the normal course of our business and are neither material nor place us at any competitive disadvantage. We do not currently expect that compliance with such laws and regulations will require us to make material expenditures. From time to time, in the operation of our environmental consulting and engineering services, the assets of which were sold in 1996, we handled small quantities of certain hazardous wastes or other substances generated by our customers. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (the “Superfund Act”), the EPA is authorized to take administrative and judicial action to either cause parties who are responsible under the Superfund Act for cleaning up any unauthorized release of hazardous substances to do so, or to clean up such hazardous substances and to seek reimbursement of the costs thereof from the responsible parties, who are jointly and severally liable for such costs under the Superfund Act. The EPA may also bring suit for treble damages from responsible parties who unreasonably refuse to voluntarily participate in such a clean-up or funding thereof. Responsible parties include anyone who owns or operates the facility where the release occurred (either currently and/or at the time such hazardous substances were disposed of), or who by contract arranges for disposal, treatment, transportation for disposal or treatment of a hazardous substance, or who accepts hazardous substances for transport to disposal or treatment facilities selected by such person from which there is a release. We believe that our risk of liability is minimized since our handling consisted solely of maintaining and storing small samples of materials for laboratory analysis that are classified as hazardous. Due to its prohibitive costs, we accordingly do not currently carry insurance to cover liabilities which we may incur under the Superfund Act or similar environmental statutes. Intellectual Property We are the holder of various patents, trademarks, trade secrets and licenses, which have not historically been material to our consolidated business operations. However, our recently acquired subsidiary, Quest Integrity, has significant trade secrets and intellectual property pertaining to its in-line inspection tool technologies. This subsidiary was acquired in fiscal year 2011 and a significant amount of the purchase price was allocated to these intangible assets (See Note 2). Competition In general, competition stems from a large number of other outside service contractors. More than 100 different competitors are currently active in our markets. We believe we have a competitive advantage over most service contractors due to the quality, training and experience of our technicians, our nationwide and increasingly international service capability, our broad range of services, and our technical support and manufacturing capabilities supporting the service network. However, there are other competitors that may offer a similar range of coverage or services and include, but are not limited to, Acuren Group, Inc., Furmanite Corporation, Guardian Compliance, Mistras Group, Inc. and T.D. Williamson, Inc. Available Information As a public company, we are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within established deadlines. Any document we file with the SEC may be viewed or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Additional information regarding the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. Our SEC filings are also available to the public through the SEC’s website located at www.sec.gov. 6 Our internet website address is www.teamindustrialservices.com. Information contained on our website is not part of this report on Form 10-K. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Proxy Statements and current reports on Form 8-K filed with (or furnished to) the SEC are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish such material. We also post our code of ethical conduct, our governance principles, our social responsibility policy and the charters of our Board of Directors’ (the “Board”) committees on our website. Our governance documents are available in print to any stockholder that submits a written request to Team, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600, Sugar Land, Texas, 77478. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Past financial performance is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors in our common stock should not use historical performance to anticipate results or future period trends. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. The risk factors described below should be carefully considered in addition to other information contained or incorporated by reference herein. We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risk factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The following risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating our outlook of future Company performance. The current economic environment may affect our customers’ demand for our services. The ongoing economic uncertainty has reduced the availability of liquidity and credit and, in many cases, reduced demand for our customers’ products. Continued disruption of the credit markets could also adversely affect our customers’ ability to finance on-going maintenance and new projects, resulting in contract cancellations or suspensions, and project delays. An extended or deepening recession may result in further plant closures or other contractions in our customer base. These factors may also adversely affect our ability to collect payment for work we have previously performed. Furthermore, our ability to expand our business could be limited if, in the future, we are unable to increase our credit capacity under favorable terms or at all. Such disruptions, should they occur, could materially impact our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our revenues are heavily dependent on certain industries. Sales of our services are dependent on customers in certain industries, particularly the refining and petrochemical industries. As experienced in the past, and as expected to occur in the future, downturns characterized by diminished demand for services in these industries could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. We sell our services in highly competitive markets, which places pressure on our profit margins and limits our ability to maintain or increase the market share of our services. Our competition generally stems from other outside service contractors, many of whom offer a similar range of services. The ongoing economic uncertainty has generally reduced demand for industrial services and thus created a more competitive bidding environment for new and existing work. No assurances can be made that we will continue to maintain our pricing model and our profit margins or increase our market share. No assurances can be made that we will be successful in maintaining or renewing our contracts with our customers. A significant portion of our contracts and agreements with customers may be terminated by either party on short notice. Although we actively pursue the renewal of our contracts, we cannot assure that we will be able to renew these contracts or that the terms of the renewed contracts will be as favorable as the existing contracts. If we are unable to renew or replace these contracts, or if we renew on less favorable terms, we may suffer a material reduction in revenue and earnings. No assurances can be made that we will be successful in hiring or retaining members of a skilled technical workforce. We have a skilled technical workforce and an industry recognized technician training program for each of our service lines that prepares new employees as well as further trains our existing 7 employees. The competition for these individuals is intense. The loss of the services of a number of these individuals, or failure to attract new employees, could adversely affect our ability to perform our obligations on our customers’ projects or maintenance and consequently could negatively impact the demand for our products and services. Unsatisfactory safety performance can affect customer relationships, result in higher operating costs and negatively impact our ability to hire and retain a skilled technical workforce. Our workers are subject to the normal hazards associated with providing services at industrial facilities. Even with proper safety precautions, these hazards can lead to personal injury, loss of life, destruction of property, plant and equipment, lower employee morale and environmental damage. We are intensely focused on maintaining a strong safety environment and reducing the risk of accidents to the lowest possible level. Poor safety performance may limit or eliminate potential revenue streams from many of our largest customers and may materially increase our future insurance and other operating costs. Although we maintain insurance coverage, such coverage may be inadequate to protect us from all expenses related to these risks. Our operations and properties are subject to extensive governmental regulation under environmental laws. Environmental laws and regulations can impose substantial sanctions for violations or operational changes that may limit our services. We must conform our operations to applicable regulatory requirements and adapt to changes in such requirements in all locations in which we operate. These actions may increase the overall costs of providing our services. Some of our services involve handling or monitoring highly regulated materials, including volatile organic compounds or hazardous wastes. Environmental laws and regulations generally impose limitations and standards for regulated materials and require us to obtain permits and comply with various other requirements. The improper characterization, handling, disposal or monitoring of regulated materials or any other failure by us to comply with increasingly complex and strictly enforced federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations or associated environmental permits could subject us to the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory or remedial obligations, or the issuance of injunctions that could restrict or prevent our ability to operate our business and complete contracted services. A defect in our services or faulty workmanship could result in an environmental liability if, as a result of the defect or faulty workmanship, a contaminate is released into the environment. We currently maintain liability insurance to limit any potential loss, but there can be no assurance that our insurance will fully protect us against a claim or loss. We perform services in hazardous environments on or around high-pressure, high temperature systems and our employees are exposed to a number of hazards, including exposure to hazardous materials, explosion hazards and fire hazards. Incidents that occur at these large industrial facilities or systems, regardless of fault, may be catastrophic and adversely impact our employees and third parties by causing serious personal injury, loss of life, damage to property or the environment, and interruption of operations. Our contracts typically require us to indemnify our customers for injury, damage or loss arising out of our presence at our customers’ location, regardless of fault, or the performance of our services and provide for warranties for materials and workmanship. We may also be required to name the customer as an additional insured under our insurance policies. We maintain insurance coverage against these and other risks associated with our business. Due to the high cost of general liability coverage, we maintain insurance with a self-insured retention of $3 million per occurrence. This insurance may not protect us against liability for certain events, including events involving pollution, product or professional liability, losses resulting from business interruption or acts of terrorism or damages from breach of contract by the Company. We cannot assure you that our insurance will be adequate in risk coverage or policy limits to cover all losses or liabilities that we may incur. Moreover, in the future, we cannot assure that we will be able to maintain insurance at levels of risk coverage or policy limits that we deem adequate. Any future damages caused by our products or services that are not covered by insurance or are in excess of policy limits could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. We are involved and are likely to continue to be involved in legal proceedings, which will increase our costs and, if adversely determined, could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position 8 or cash flows. We are currently a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the operation of our business and it is reasonable to expect that we will be named in future actions. Most of the legal proceedings against us arise out of the normal course of performing services at customer facilities, and include claims for workers’ compensation, personal injury and property damage. Legal proceedings can be expensive to defend and can divert the attention of management and other personnel for significant periods of time, regardless of the ultimate outcome. An unsuccessful defense of a liability claim could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Economic, political and other risks associated with international operations could adversely affect our business. A significant portion of our operations are conducted and located outside the United States and, accordingly, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates, instability in political or economic conditions, difficulty in repatriating cash proceeds, differing employee relations, differing regulatory environments, trade protection measures, and difficulty in administering and enforcing corporate policies which may be different than the normal business practices of local cultures. In many foreign countries, particularly in those with developing economies, it is common to engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. and foreign anti-corruption regulations applicable to us such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and the United Kingdom Bribery Act. Our international business operations may include projects in countries where corruption is prevalent. Although we have, and continue to, implement policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, contractors or agents, including those representing us in countries where practices which violate such anti-corruption laws may be customary, will not take actions in violation of our policies and procedures. Any violation of foreign or U.S. laws by our employees, contractors or agents, even if such violation is prohibited by our policies and procedures, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our growth strategy entails risk for investors. We intend to continue to pursue acquisitions in, or complementary to, the specialty maintenance and construction services industry to complement and diversify our existing business. We may not be able to continue to expand our market presence through attractive acquisitions, and any future acquisitions may present unforeseen integration difficulties or costs. From time to time, we make acquisitions of other businesses that enhance our services or geographic scope. No assurances can be made that we will realize the cost savings, synergies or revenue enhancements that we may anticipate from any acquisition, or that we will realize such benefits within the time frame that we expect. If we are not able to address the challenges associated with acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired businesses, or if our integrated product and service offerings fail to achieve market acceptance, our business could be adversely affected. The consideration paid in connection with an acquisition may also affect our share price or future financial results depending on the structure of such consideration. To the extent we issue stock or other rights to purchase stock, including options or other rights, existing shareholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease. In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of additional debt. The price of our outstanding securities may be volatile. It is possible that in some future quarter or quarters our revenues, operating results or other measures of financial performance will not meet the expectations of public stock market analysts or investors, which could cause the price of our outstanding securities to decline or be volatile. Historically, our quarterly and annual sales and operating results have fluctuated. We expect fluctuations to continue in the future. In addition to general economic and political conditions, the following factors may affect our sales and operating results: the timing of significant customer orders, the timing of planned maintenance projects at customer facilities, changes in competitive pricing, wide variations in profitability by product line, variations in operating expenses, rapid increases in raw material and labor costs, the timing of announcements or introductions of new products or services by us, our competitors or our respective customers, the acceptance of those services, our ability to adequately meet staffing requirements with qualified personnel, relative variations in manufacturing efficiencies and costs, and the relative strength or weakness of international markets. Since our quarterly and annual revenues and operating results vary, we believe that period-to-period comparisons are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicators of our future performance. 9 Our business may be adversely impacted by work stoppages, staffing shortages and other labor matters. At May 31, 2013, we had approximately 4,200 employees approximately 700 of whom were located in Canada and Europe where employees predominantly are represented by unions. Although we believe that our relations with our employees are good and we have had no strikes or work stoppages, no assurances can be made that we will not experience these and other types of conflicts with labor unions, works councils, other groups representing employees, or our employees in general, or that any future negotiations with our labor unions will not result in significant increases in the cost of labor. Climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of “greenhouse gases” could result in reduced demand for our services and products. Recent scientific studies have suggested that emissions of certain gases, commonly referred to as “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to warming of the earth’s atmosphere. As a result, there have been a variety of regulatory developments, proposals or requirements and legislative initiatives that have been introduced in the United States (and other parts of the world) that are focused on restricting the emission of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases. The adoption and implementation of any regulations which impose limiting emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from customers for whom we provide repair and maintenance services could affect demand for our products and services. Interruptions in the proper functioning of our information systems could disrupt operations and cause increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues. The proper functioning of our information systems is critical to the successful operation of our business. Although our information systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, our information systems are still vulnerable to natural disasters, power losses, telecommunication failures and other problems. If critical information systems fail or are otherwise unavailable, our business operations could be adversely affected. New regulations related to conflict-free minerals may cause us to incur additional expenses. The Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act contains provisions to improve transparency and accountability regarding the use of “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries “DRC”. The SEC has established new annual disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use “conflict” minerals sourced from the DRC in their products. These new requirements could limit the pool of suppliers who can provide conflict-free minerals and as a result, we cannot ensure that we will be able to obtain these minerals at competitive prices. Compliance with these new requirements may also increase our costs. In addition, we may face challenges with our customers if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins of the minerals used in our products. Other risk factors. Other risk factors may include interruption of our operations, or the operations of our customers due to fire, hurricanes, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist attacks, labor disruptions, health epidemics and other events beyond our control. Any one of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future results of operations, financial position or cash flows and whether any forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K ultimately prove to be accurate. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. 10 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We own several facilities used in our operations. Our 88,000 square foot facility in Alvin, Texas consists of our primary training facility and ISO-9001 certified manufacturing facility for clamps, enclosures, and sealants. Additionally, we own a 30,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Houston, Texas and an 11,000 square foot equipment distribution facility in Pearland, Texas. We also own offices for our branch service locations in the following areas: • Beaumont, Texas (27,000 square feet) • Pasadena, Texas (27,000 square feet) • Tulsa, Oklahoma (23,000 square feet) • Stafford, Texas (20,000 square feet) • Edmonton, Alberta (17,000 square feet) • Milwaukee, Wisconsin (10,000 square feet) All other facilities used in our operations are provided through operating leases. Included in assets held for sale is $5.2 million pertaining to 50 acres purchased in October 2007 on which we had previously planned to construct future facilities in Pearland, Texas. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012, we decided not to proceed with construction of the future facilities at this location and recognized a $1.7 million asset write-down of pre-construction building costs and capitalized interest. The property is being actively marketed using the services of a broker. We believe that our property and equipment are adequate for our current needs, although additional investments are expected to be made in property and equipment for expansion, replacement of assets at the end of their useful lives and in connection with corporate development activities. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Con Ed Matter—We have, from time to time, provided temporary leak repair services for the steam operations of Con Ed located in New York City. In July 2007, a Con Ed steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured causing one death and other injuries and property damage. As of May 31, 2013, ninety-five lawsuits have been filed against Con Ed, the City of New York and Team in the Supreme Courts of New York located in Kings, New York and Bronx County, alleging that our temporary leak repair services may have contributed to the cause of the rupture. The lawsuits seek generally unspecified compensatory damages for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. Additionally, on March 31, 2008, we received a letter from Con Ed alleging that our contract with Con Ed requires us to indemnify and defend Con Ed for additional claims filed against Con Ed as a result of the rupture. Con Ed filed an action to join Team and the City of New York as defendants in all lawsuits filed against Con Ed that did not include Team and the City of New York as direct defendants. We are vigorously defending the lawsuits and Con Ed’s claim for indemnification. We are unable to estimate the amount of liability to us, if any, associated with these lawsuits and the claim for indemnification. We maintain insurance coverage, subject to a deductible limit of $250,000, which we believe should cover these claims. We have not accrued any liability in excess of the deductible limit for the lawsuits. We do not believe the ultimate outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. EPA Matter—As part of a plea agreement entered in July 2012, we pled guilty to a single misdemeanor violation of a section of the Clean Air Act related to fugitive emissions monitoring services provided to a customer serviced by our Borger, Texas office. As part of the plea agreement, we developed and are now implementing an environmental compliance plan for our emissions monitoring services to enhance our 11 compliance with the Clean Air Act. Also as part of the plea agreement, in November 2012 we were assessed a fine of $200,000 and placed on probation for a term of five years. We are involved in various other lawsuits and are subject to various claims and proceedings encountered in the normal conduct of business. In our opinion, any uninsured losses that might arise from these lawsuits and proceedings will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 12 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Information Prior to January 3, 2012, our stock was traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “TISI”. Beginning January 3, 2012, our stock is now traded on the NYSE under the same symbol. The table below reflects the high and low sales prices of our common stock by quarter for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Sales Price High Low 2013 Quarter ended: August 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 30, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32.63 $36.90 $45.66 $46.66 $25.61 $30.24 $35.34 $34.64 2012 Quarter ended: August 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27.48 $27.43 $32.50 $33.50 $20.27 $19.98 $26.39 $24.95 13 Performance Graph The following performance graph compares the performance of our common stock to the NYSE Composite Index and a Peer Group Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on May 31, 2008 in our common stock, the NYSE Composite Index and a Peer Group Index. The values of each investment are based on share price appreciation, with reinvestment of all dividends, assuming any were paid. For each graph, the investments are assumed to have occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The following companies are included in our peer group index used in the graph: Furmanite Corporation, Matrix Service Company, Englobal Corporation and Mistras Group, Inc. COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Team, Inc., the NYSE Composite Index, and a Peer Group $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 5/08 5/09 5/10 5/11 5/12 5/13 Team, Inc. NYSE Composite Peer Group *$100 invested on 5/31/08 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending May 31. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Team, Inc. NYSE Composite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peer Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.00 100.00 100.00 44.16 65.82 47.64 46.94 76.23 40.97 71.79 97.29 59.28 83.27 87.93 54.12 112.58 113.11 62.26 5/08 5/09 5/10 5/11 5/12 5/13 Notes: The above information was provided by Research Data Group, Inc. Holders There were 197 holders of record of our common stock as of July 29, 2013 excluding beneficial owners of stock held in street name. Dividends No cash dividends were declared or paid during the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. We are not permitted to pay cash dividends without the consent of our bank syndicate. Accordingly, we have no present intention to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Additionally, any future dividend payments will continue to depend on our financial condition, market conditions and other matters deemed relevant by the Board. Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans This information has been omitted from this report on Form 10-K as we intend to file such information in our definitive proxy statement no later than 120 days following the close of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2013. The information required regarding equity compensation plans is hereby incorporated by reference. 14 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following is a summary of selected financial information for the five years ended May 31 (in thousands, except per share data): Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income available to Team shareholders . . . . . . . . Net income per share 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 $714,311 $ 55,602 $ 32,436 $623,740 $ 56,497 $ 32,911 $508,020 $ 42,475 $ 26,585 $453,869 $ 24,777 $ 12,275 $497,559 $ 41,271 $ 22,911 Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.61 1.53 $ $ 1.67 1.59 $ $ 1.38 1.32 $ $ 0.65 0.63 $ $ 1.22 1.16 Weighted-average shares outstanding Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,203 21,166 19,667 20,660 19,206 20,083 18,923 19,510 18,793 19,725 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,664 $ 3,931 $ 26,068 $ 17,469 $ 4,386 $ 23,924 $ 14,584 $ 4,993 $ 13,158 $ 12,509 5,009 $ 7,711 $ $ 12,116 $ 4,761 $ 16,383 Balance sheet data: Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities . . Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $460,203 $ 95,209 $292,190 $174,114 5,384 $ $403,788 $ 97,131 $245,001 $157,019 5,097 $ $355,486 $ 86,299 $209,446 $130,533 4,983 $ $275,921 $264,989 $ 82,628 $ 56,795 $146,501 $165,192 $107,343 $109,845 $ — $ — 15 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following review of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with Item 1 “Business,” Item 1A “Risk Factors,” Item 2 “Properties,” and Item 8 “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” included in this Form 10-K. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, other written or oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements may be made by us or on behalf of the Company in other materials we release to the public including all statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, that address activities, events or developments which we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future. You can generally identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “projection,” “predict,” “budget,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “target,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “may” and similar expressions. We based our forward-looking statements on our reasonable beliefs and assumptions, and our current expectations, estimates and projections about ourselves and our industry. We caution that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. We wish to ensure that such statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements, so as to obtain the protections of the safe harbor established in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Accordingly, forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of future results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the statements, including, but not limited to the statements under “Risk Factors.” We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is provided as a supplement to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations. General Information We are a leading provider of specialty industrial services, including inspection and assessment, required in maintaining high temperature and high pressure piping systems and vessels that are utilized extensively in the refining, petrochemical, power, pipeline and other heavy industries. Through fiscal year 2013, we operated in only one segment- the industrial services segment (see Note 14). Within the industrial services segment, we were organized as two divisions. Our TCM division provided the services of inspection and assessment and field heat treating and pipeline integrity management. Our TMS division provided the services of leak repair, fugitive emissions, hot tapping, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair and other mechanical services. Effective July 1, 2013, we implemented a reorganization of our business divisions and from that date forward we will conduct operations in three segments: Inspection and IHT Group. MS Group, and Quest Integrity Group. While our services have been realigned in three business groups, we believe our services broadly fall into three different classifications that have unique customer demand drivers: inspection and assessment services, turnaround services, and on-stream services. 16 Inspection and assessment services are offered in both IHT Group and Quest Integrity Group. These services include basic and advanced non-destructive testing, pipeline integrity management services, as well as associated engineering and assessment services. These services can be offered while facilities are running (on- stream) or during facility turnarounds or during new construction or expansion activities. We believe there is a general growth in market demand for these services as improved inspection technologies enable better information about asset reliability and integrity to be available to facility owners and operators. Turnaround services are offered in both the IHT Group and in the MS Group. These services represent project-related services and demand is a function of the number and scope of scheduled and unscheduled facility turnarounds and as well as new industrial facility construction or expansion. Turnaround services includes the field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, heat exchanger repair, and isolation test plugging services that are part of the MS Group and the Field Heat Treating services that are part of the IHT Group. On-stream services are offered by the MS Group and represent the services offered while plants are operating and under pressure. These services include leak repair, fugitive emissions control and hot tapping. We believe demand for on-stream services is a function of the population of the existing infrastructure of operating industrial facilities. We offer these services in over 125 locations throughout the world. Our industrial services are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. We market our services to companies in a diverse array of heavy industries which include the petrochemical, refining, power, pipeline, steel, pulp and paper industries, as well as municipalities, shipbuilding, OEMs, distributors, and some of the world’s largest engineering and construction firms. Our services are also provided across a broad geographic reach. Year Ended May 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended May 31, 2012 The following table sets forth the components of revenue and operating income from our operations for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 (in thousands): Year Ended May 31, 2013 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Increase (Decrease) $ % Revenues: TCM division Inspection and Heat Treating . . . . . . . . . . . Quest Integrity Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $380,518 57,433 $314,408 40,422 $66,110 17,011 TMS division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SG&A expenses: Field operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-routine legal settlement Total SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . 437,951 276,360 714,311 212,965 135,495 22,860 — 158,355 992 354,830 268,910 623,740 195,051 117,044 21,893 800 139,737 1,183 83,121 7,450 90,571 17,914 18,451 967 (800) 18,618 (191) 21% 42% 23% 3% 15% 9% 16% 4% 100% 13% (16)% Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 55,602 $ 56,497 $ (895) (2)% Revenues. Our revenues for the year ended May 31, 2013 were $714.3 million compared to $623.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2012, an increase of $90.6 million or 15%. Revenues for our TCM division for the year ended May 31, 2013 were $438.0 million compared to $354.8 million for the year ended May 31, 2012, an increase of $83.1 million or 23%. Included in the TCM division for 2013 are revenues from Quest Integrity 17 Group, which became a stand-alone segment effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 2014. Quest Integrity revenues of $57.4 million were up 42% over the prior year as a result of expanded pipeline integrity management services and further market penetration of proprietary in-line inspection technologies. The remainder of the TCM division, which now comprises the new Inspection and Heat Treating Services group, had revenues of $380.5 million, up $66.1 million, or 21% over the prior year. Included in that amount was $13 million of revenue associated with businesses acquired during the year. Revenues for our TMS division for the year ended May 31, 2013 were $276.4 million compared to $268.9 million for the year ended May 31, 2012, an increase of $7.5 million or 3%. TMS revenue growth was negatively impacted by a reduction in the number of very large turnaround projects in the second half of the fiscal year 2013 as compared to the same period of fiscal year 2012. The following table presents our revenues by customer demand drivers (in thousands): Inspection and assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Turnaround . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On-stream services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended May 31, 2013 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Increase (Decrease) $ $338,343 231,916 144,052 $714,311 $262,523 215,908 145,309 $75,820 16,008 (1,257) $623,740 $90,571 % 29% 7% (1)% 15% Gross margin. Our gross margin for the year ended May 31, 2013 was $213.0 million compared to $195.1 million for the year ended May 31, 2012, an increase of $17.9 million or 9%. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 30% for the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to 31% for the year ended May 31, 2012. The decline in gross margin percentage was primarily due to higher indirect costs in the second half of the year. Revenue growth rates declined as a result of a reduction in the number of very large turnaround projects in the spring of 2013 compared to the very strong spring 2012 turnaround season. Selling, general and administrative expenses. Our SG&A expenses for the year ended May 31, 2013 were $158.4 million compared to $139.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2012, an increase of $18.6 million or 13%. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses were 22% in the current year and the prior year. Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates. Our earnings from unconsolidated affiliates consists entirely of our joint venture (50% ownership) formed in May 2008, to perform non-destructive testing and inspection services in Alaska. Revenues of the joint venture not reflected in our consolidated revenues for the year ended May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 were $13.5 million and $12.3 million, respectively. Our share of the earnings from the joint venture were $1.0 million for the year ended May 31, 2013 and $1.2 million for the year ended May 31, 2012. Interest. Interest expense was $2.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to $2.4 million for the year ended May 31, 2012. Foreign currency loss (gain). There were $0.9 million currency transaction losses for the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to gains of $0.1 million for the year ended May 31, 2012. Currency transaction gains and losses are primarily due to fluctuations between the Venezuelan Bolivar and the U.S. Dollar. We account for Venezuela as a highly-inflationary economy and accordingly, all currency fluctuations between the Bolivar and the U.S. Dollar are recorded in our statement of operations. Due to the recent devaluation of the Bolivar in February 2013, we recorded a $0.6 million foreign currency loss during the year ended May 31, 2013. Management is closely monitoring currency valuation developments in Venezuela. If further devaluations occur in fiscal year 2014, we will incur further impairments of our investment in Venezuela. Taxes. The provision for income tax was $19.2 million on pre-tax income of $51.9 million for the year ended May 31, 2013 compared to the provision for income tax of $19.4 million on pre-tax income of $52.5 million for the year ended May 31, 2012. The effective tax rate was 37% for the year ended May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012. 18 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended May 31, 2011 The following table sets forth the components of revenue and operating income from our operations for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 (in thousands): Year Ended May 31, 2012 Year Ended May 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) $ % Revenues: TCM division Inspection and Heat Treating . . . . . . . . . Quest Integrity Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $314,408 40,422 $268,783 15,833 $ 45,625 24,589 17% 155% TMS division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SG&A expenses: Field operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-routine acquisition costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-routine legal settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . 354,830 268,910 623,740 195,051 117,044 21,893 — 800 139,737 1,183 284,616 223,404 508,020 157,143 95,806 19,260 632 — 115,698 1,030 70,214 45,506 115,720 37,908 21,238 2,633 (632) 800 24,039 153 Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 56,497 $ 42,475 $ 14,022 25% 20% 23% 24% 22% 14% (100)% 100% 21% 15% 33% Revenues. Our revenues for the year ended May 31, 2012 were $623.7 million compared to $508.0 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $115.7 million or 23%. Revenues for our TCM division for the year ended May 31, 2012 were $354.8 million compared to $284.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $70.2 million or 25%. Revenues for our TMS division for the year ended May 31, 2012 were $268.9 million compared to $223.4 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $45.5 million or 20%. Organic revenue growth was approximately $100 million or 20% for the year ended May 31, 2012. Overall revenue growth was broad based across services lines, geography and customers and was a result of strong service performance, beginning the year with a strong tailwind as it relates to turnaround projects, expansion of new services lines and capabilities, and long term procurement consolidation trends by our customers. The following table presents our revenues by customer demand drivers (in thousands): Inspection and assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Turnaround . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On-stream services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended May 31, 2012 Year Ended May 31, 2011 Increase (Decrease) $ $262,523 215,908 145,309 $623,740 $200,926 175,728 131,366 $ 61,597 40,180 13,943 $508,020 $115,720 % 31% 23% 11% 23% Gross margin. Our gross margin for the year ended May 31, 2012 was $195.1 million compared to $157.1 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $37.9 million or 24%. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 31% for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. Gross margin for our TCM division for the year ended May 31, 2012 was $110.2 million compared to $87.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $22.6 million or 26%. TCM division gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 31% for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011. Gross margin for our TMS division was $84.9 million for the year ended May 31, 2012 compared to $69.6 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $15.3 million or 22%. 19 TMS division gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 32% for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 31% for the year ended May 31, 2011. Gross margins for both divisions reflect relatively flat year over year job margins. Fluctuations in gross margins are primarily impacted by service line mix. Selling, general and administrative expenses. Our SG&A expenses for the year ended May 31, 2012 were $139.7 million compared to $115.7 million for the year ended May 31, 2011, an increase of $24.0 million or 21%. SG&A expenses for the current year ended May 31, 2012 includes a non-routine $0.8 million pre-tax legal settlement related to the resolution of a long outstanding personal injury matter and in the prior year included $0.6 million of non-routine expense related to the Quest Integrity acquisition. Excluding these non-routine charges, SG&A expenses for the year ended May 31, 2012 were $138.9 million, an increase of $23.9 million or 21%. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue, adjusted to exclude the non-routine charges, was 22% for the year ended May 31, 2012 compared to 23% for the year ended May 31, 2011. The increase in SG&A expenses primarily was related to compensation related costs within field operations supporting organic growth. Also included in SG&A expenses were approximately $2.7 million in unusually elevated expenses in the year. First, we incurred $2.0 million in increased medical costs accruals. We accrue medical costs based on our actuarial expectation of claims. Due to an unusual number of major claims that hit during the fiscal year, our actual costs exceeded our accruals, thus requiring the additional expense. Second, we incurred about $0.7 million in outside legal and professional services expenses related to two recently completed acquisitions as well as significant efforts on unsuccessful transaction activities. Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates. Our earnings from unconsolidated affiliates consists entirely of our joint venture (50% ownership) formed in May 2008, to perform non-destructive testing and inspection services in Alaska. Revenues of the joint venture not reflected in our consolidated revenues for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011 were $12.3 million and $9.9 million, respectively. As a result of the higher revenue levels in the joint venture, and leverage of fixed costs of the joint venture, our share of the earnings from the joint venture were $1.2 million, an increase of $0.2 million or 15%. Interest. Interest expense was $2.4 million for the year ended May 31, 2012 compared to $2.2 million for the year ended May 31, 2011. The increase is a result of higher interest rates applied to increased outstanding borrowings. Foreign currency (gain) loss. There were no significant currency transaction gains or losses for the year ended May 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Taxes. The provision for income tax for fiscal year 2012 was $19.4 million on pre-tax income of $52.5 million, compared to the provision for income tax for fiscal year 2011 of $13.5 million on pre-tax income of $40.2 million. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, we identified and corrected accounting errors relating to the effect of share-based compensation on tax provisions for fiscal years 2007-2010. During those periods, reported earnings were understated because effective tax rates were overstated as a result of the previously undetected errors in the tax provision calculation. No restatement of previously issued financial statements was required because the effect on those statements was immaterial. The cumulative effect of the errors in the tax provision calculation was a tax benefit consisting of $1.8 million associated with the prior years. Our effective tax rate for the fiscal year 2012 was 37% compared to 38% for the fiscal year 2011 which excludes the effect of the $1.8 million portion of the cumulative adjustments related to prior years (see Note 8). Liquidity and Capital Resources Financing for our operations consists primarily of vendor financing and leasing arrangements, our banking credit facility “Credit Facility” and cash flows attributable to our operations, which we believe are sufficient to fund our business needs. In July 2011, we renewed our Credit Facility with our banking syndicate. The Credit Facility has borrowing capacity of up to $150 million in multiple currencies, bears interest based on a variable 20 Eurodollar rate option (LIBOR plus 1.75% margin at May 31, 2013) with the margin based on financial covenants set forth in the Credit Facility, and matures in July 2016. In connection with the renewal of the Credit Facility, we capitalized $0.8 million of associated debt issuance costs which are being amortized over the life of the Credit Facility. At May 31, 2013, we had $34.2 million of cash on hand and approximately $64 million of available borrowing capacity through our Credit Facility. Our Credit Facility does not mature until July 2016 and there are no mandatory payments before the maturity date. At that time, we expect to be able to renew the facility based upon our long-term relationships with each member bank of our Credit Facility and the relatively low credit leverage defined as our debt to EBITDA ratio. During fiscal year 2013, our net borrowing/repayment activity resulted in a $13.6 million reduction to the outstanding balance of the Credit Facility compared to the ending balance as of May 31, 2012. In order to secure our casualty insurance programs we are required to post letters of credit generally issued by a bank as collateral. A letter of credit commits the issuer to remit specified amounts to the holder, if the holder demonstrates that we failed to meet our obligations under the letter of credit. If this were to occur, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer for any payments the issuer was required to remit to the holder of the letter of credit. At May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, we were contingently liable for outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaling $13.1 million and $13.5 million, respectively. Outstanding letters of credit reduce amounts available under our Credit Facility and are considered as having been funded for purposes of calculating our financial covenants under the Credit Facility. On February 12, 2008, we borrowed €12.3 million under the Credit Facility to serve as an economic hedge of our net investment in our European operations as fluctuations in the fair value of the borrowing attributable to the U.S. Dollar/Euro spot rate offset translation gains or losses attributable to our investment in our European operations. At May 31, 2013, the €12.3 million borrowing had a U.S. Dollar value of $16.0 million. Contractual Obligations A summary of contractual obligations as of May 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands): Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years Total Long term debt obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — 14,736 — $14,736 $ — $72,946 8,999 21,123 — 5,097 $26,220 $81,945 $ — 13,383 — $13,383 $ 72,946 58,241 5,097 $136,284 A summary of long-term debt and other contractual obligations as of May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands): May 31, 2013 2012 Credit Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $72,946 — $85,872 — Long-term debt, excluding current maturities . . . . . . . . $72,946 $85,872 Outstanding letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasing arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,149 $58,241 $ 5,097 $13,548 $36,121 — Restrictions on cash. Included in our cash and cash equivalents at May 31, 2013, is $1.2 million of cash in Venezuela and $16.5 million of cash in foreign subsidiaries (located primarily in Europe and Canada) where earnings are considered by the Company to be permanently reinvested. In the event that some or all of this cash were to be repatriated, we would be required to accrue and pay additional taxes. While not legally restricted from 21 repatriating this cash, we consider all undistributed earnings of these foreign subsidiaries in the amount of $14.4 million to be indefinitely reinvested and access to cash to be limited. Similarly, the uncertain economic and political environment in Venezuela makes it very difficult to repatriate the cash of our Venezuelan subsidiary. Due to the official devaluation of the Venezuelan currency, the Bolivar, in February 2013 we recorded a devaluation loss of $0.6 million during the year ended May 31, 2013. Management is closely monitoring currency valuation developments in Venezuela. If further devaluations occur in fiscal year 2014, we will incur further impairments of our investment in Venezuela. Cash flows attributable to our operating activities. For the year ended May 31, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $58.6 million. Positive operating cash flow was primarily attributable to net income of $32.7 million, depreciation and amortization of $19.7 million, and non-cash compensation cost of $3.9 million offset by a $3.1 million increase in working capital. Cash flows attributable to our investing activities. For the year ended May 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $42.9 million, consisting primarily of $26.1 million of capital expenditures and $18.6 million related to business acquisitions. Capital expenditures can vary depending upon specific customer needs that may arise unexpectedly. Cash flows attributable to our financing activities. For the year ended May 31, 2013, net cash used in financing activities was $3.9 million consisting primarily of $13.6 million of cash related to net payments made under the Credit Facility. Effect of exchange rate changes on cash. For the year ended May 31, 2013, the effect of exchange rate changes on cash was a negative impact of $0.2 million. We have significant operations in Europe and Canada, as well as operations in Venezuela which is considered a hyperinflationary economy. The positive impact in the current year is primarily attributable to changes in U.S. Dollar exchange rates with Canada and Europe. Critical Accounting Policies The process of preparing financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and judgments. It is possible that materially different amounts could be recorded if these estimates and judgments change or if actual results differ from these estimates and judgments. We have identified the following six critical accounting policies that require a significant amount of estimation and judgment and are considered to be important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations: • Revenue Recognition • Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Non-Controlling Interest • Income Taxes • Workers’ Compensation, Auto, Medical and General Liability Accruals • Allowance for Doubtful Accounts • Estimated Useful Lives Revenue recognition. We determine our revenue recognition guidelines for our operations based on guidance provided in applicable accounting standards and positions adopted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or the SEC. Most of our projects are short-term in nature and we predominantly derive revenues by providing a variety of industrial services on a time and material basis. For all of these services our revenues are recognized when services are rendered or when product is shipped and risk of ownership passes to the customer. However, due to various contractual terms with our customers, at the end of any reporting period, there may be earned but unbilled revenue that is accrued to properly match revenues with related costs. At May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, the amount of earned but unbilled revenue included in accounts receivable was $25.5 million and $20.6 million, respectively. 22 Goodwill, intangible assets and non-controlling interest. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but are instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”). Intangible assets with estimated useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Through the end of fiscal year 2013 we operated in only one segment—the industrial services segment (see Note 14). Within the industrial services segment, we were organized as two divisions. Our TCM division provided the services of inspection and assessment and field heat treating. Our TMS division provided the services of leak repair, fugitive emissions, hot tapping, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair and other mechanical services. Each division has goodwill relating to past acquisitions and we assess goodwill for impairment at the TCM and TMS divisional level. Our annual goodwill impairment test is conducted as of May 31 of each year, which is our fiscal year end. Conducting the impairment test as of May 31 of each fiscal year aligns with our annual budget process which is typically completed during the fourth quarter of each year. In addition, performing our annual goodwill impairment test as of this date allows for a thorough consideration of the valuations of our business units subsequent to the completion of our annual budget process but prior to our financial year end reporting date. Prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, “ASU 2011-08” at May 31, 2012, the annual impairment test for goodwill was a two-step process that involved comparing the estimated fair value of each business unit to the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a business unit exceeded its carrying amount, the goodwill of the business unit was not considered impaired; therefore, the second step of the impairment test was deemed unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a business unit exceeded its fair value, we would then perform a second step to the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recorded. Consistent with prior years tested, the fair values of reporting units in fiscal year 2011 was determined using a method based on discounted cash flow models with estimated cash flows based on internal forecasts of revenues and expenses over a four year period plus a terminal value period (the income approach). The income approach estimated fair value by discounting each reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows using a discount rate that approximated both our weighted- average cost of capital and reflects current market conditions. The fair value derived from the income approach in our fiscal year 2011 test for impairment, in the aggregate, approximated our market capitalization. At May 31, 2011, our market capitalization exceeded the carrying value of our consolidated net assets by approximately $250 million, or 117%, and the fair value of both our individual reporting units significantly exceeded their respective carrying amounts as of that date. Projected growth rates and other market inputs to our impairment test models, such as the discount rate, are sensitive to the risk of future variances due to market conditions as well as business unit execution risks. Consequently, if future results fall below our forward-looking projections for an extended period of time, the results of future impairment tests could indicate an impairment. Although we believe the cash flow projections in our income approach make reasonable assumptions about our business, a significant increase in competition or reduction in our competitive capabilities could have a significant adverse impact on our ability to retain market share and thus on the projected margins included in the income approach used to value our reporting units. We periodically reviewed our projected growth rates and other market inputs used in our impairment test models as well as changes in our business and other factors that could represent indicators of impairment. Subsequent to our May 31, 2011 annual impairment test, no such indicators of impairment were identified. On May 31, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08 which requires reporting entities to assess relevant events and circumstances in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of goodwill. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount, then the first and second steps of the goodwill impairment test are not necessary. We evaluated considerations under ASU 23 2011-08 such as macroeconomic effects on our business, industry and market considerations, cost factors that could have a negative effect on cash flows or earnings, overall financial performance, entity-specific events, events affecting reporting units, and any realization of a sustained decrease in the price of our stock. After consideration of the aforementioned events and circumstances, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit was greater than the carrying amount of goodwill. Accordingly, we did not perform the two-step process described above for our fiscal year 2012 and 2013 annual tests. There was $103.5 million and $95.0 million of goodwill at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, respectively. A summary of goodwill is as follows (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2012 TCM Division TMS Division Total TCM Division TMS Division Total Balance at beginning of year . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency adjustments . . . $75,131 9,009 195 $19,871 (1,221) 481 $ 95,002 7,788 676 $76,872 — (1,741) $12,648 8,926 (1,703) $89,520 8,926 (3,444) Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . $84,335 $19,131 $103,466 $75,131 $19,871 $95,002 Income taxes. We follow the guidance of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) which requires that we use the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred income taxes for all significant temporary differences. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax payable and related tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain items, such as depreciation, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences can result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with ASC 740, we are required to assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized and, to the extent we believe that it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, we must establish a valuation allowance. We consider all available evidence to determine whether, based on the weight of the evidence, a valuation allowance is needed. Evidence used includes information about our current financial position and our results of operations for the current and preceding years, as well as all currently available information about future years, including our anticipated future performance, the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and tax planning strategies. Management believes future sources of taxable income, reversing temporary differences and other tax planning strategies will be sufficient to realize assets. While we have considered these factors in assessing the need for a valuation allowance, there is no assurance that a valuation allowance would not need to be established in the future if information about future years change. Any change in the valuation allowance would impact our income tax provision and net income in the period in which such a determination is made. As of May 31, 2013, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will have sufficient reversals of temporary differences and future taxable income to allow us to realize 100% of the benefits of the net deferred tax assets and accordingly, no material valuation allowance is recorded. Our belief is based upon our track record of consistent earnings over the past six years and projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible. As of May 31, 2013, our deferred tax assets were $11.0 million, and our deferred tax liabilities were $22.1 million. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items for tax purposes. In accordance with ASC 740-10, we establish reserves for uncertain tax positions when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and potentially disallowed. When facts and circumstances change, we adjust these reserves through our provision for income taxes. To the extent interest and penalties may be assessed by taxing authorities on any related 24 underpayment of income tax, such amounts have been accrued and are classified as a component of income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income. As of May 31, 2013, our unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions were $0.7 million. Workers’ compensation, auto, medical and general liability accruals. In accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies (“ASC 450”), we record a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We review our loss contingencies on an ongoing basis to ensure that we have appropriate reserves recorded on our balance sheet. These reserves are based on historical experience with claims incurred but not received, estimates and judgments made by management, applicable insurance coverage for litigation matters, and are adjusted as circumstances warrant. For workers’ compensation, our self-insured retention is $1 million and our automobile liability self-insured retention is currently $500,000 per occurrence. For general liability claims we have an effective self-insured retention of $3 million per occurrence. For medical claims, our self-insured retention is $175,000 per individual claimant determined on an annual basis. For environmental liability claims, our self-insured retention is $500,000 per occurrence. We maintain insurance for claims that exceed such self-retention limits. The insurance is subject to terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions that may not fully compensate us for all losses. Our estimates and judgments could change based on new information, changes in laws or regulations, changes in management’s plans or intentions, or the outcome of legal proceedings, settlements or other factors. If different estimates and judgments were applied with respect to these matters, it is likely that reserves would be recorded for different amounts. Allowance for doubtful accounts. In the ordinary course of business, a percentage of our accounts receivable are not collected due to billing disputes, customer bankruptcies, dissatisfaction with the services we performed and other various reasons. We establish an allowance to account for those accounts receivable that will eventually be deemed uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a combination of our historical experience and management’s review of long outstanding accounts receivable. Estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets are used to compute depreciation expense, future asset retirement obligations and are also used in impairment testing. Estimated useful lives are based, among other things, on the assumption that we provide an appropriate level of associated capital expenditures and maintenance while the assets are still in operation. Without these continued associated capital expenditures and maintenance, the useful lives of these assets could decrease significantly. Estimated useful lives could be impacted by such factors as future energy prices, environmental regulations, various legal factors and competition. If the useful lives of these assets were found to be shorter than originally estimated, depreciation expense may increase, liabilities for future asset retirement obligations may be insufficient and impairments in carrying values of tangible and intangible assets may result. Newly Adopted Accounting Principles ASU 2011-05. In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. This update requires the presentation of the components of net income and other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, companies are also required to present reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update to defer the effective date for presentation of reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income. These updates are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. This update was adopted by Team on June 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. ASU 2011-04. In May 2011, an update regarding fair value measurement was issued to conform the definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The standard also clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and expands the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements that 25 are estimated using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs. The standard update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted ASU 2011-11. In December 2011, an update was issued related to new disclosures on offsetting assets and liabilities of financial and derivative instruments. The amendments require the disclosure of gross asset and liability amounts, amounts offset on the balance sheet and amounts subject to the offsetting requirements, but not offset on the balance sheet. This standard does not amend the existing guidance on when it is appropriate to offset. The standard update is effective for annual periods beginning after January 1, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We have operations in foreign countries with a functional currency that is not the U.S. Dollar. We are exposed to market risk, primarily related to foreign currency fluctuations related to these operations. A significant part of these assets relate to our operations in Europe and Canada. During the year ended May 31, 2013, the exchange rate with the Euro increased from $1.24 per Euro to $1.30 per Euro, an increase of 5%. During the same period, the exchange rate with the Canadian Dollar remained constant at $0.97 per Canadian Dollar. For foreign subsidiaries with a functional currency that is not the U.S. Dollar, such as our operations in Europe and Canada, assets and liabilities are translated at period ending rates of exchange. Translation adjustments for the assets and liability accounts are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency translation losses in other comprehensive income were $1.1 million for the year ended May 31, 2013. We carry Euro based debt to serve as a hedge of our net investment in our European operations as fluctuations in the fair value of the borrowing attributable to the U.S. Dollar/Euro spot rate will offset translation gains or losses attributable to our investment in our European operations. We are exposed to market risk, primarily related to foreign currency fluctuations related to the unhedged portion of our investment in our European operations. At May 31, 2013, our Venezuelan subsidiary had $2.8 million of net assets denominated in Venezuelan Bolivars and translated into U.S. Dollars. We account for Venezuelan operations pursuant to accounting guidance for hyperinflationary economies. Following the designation of the Venezuelan economy as hyperinflationary, we ceased recording the effects of currency fluctuations to accumulated other comprehensive income and began reflecting all effects as a component of other income in our statement of operations. We use the Venezuelan central bank’s official published rate (6.30 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar) to translate Venezuelan assets into U.S. Dollars as no other legal rate is readily available. A 10% change in the exchange rate used to value the net assets of our Venezuelan subsidiary would have an effect on pretax earnings of $0.3 million. As discussed above, there was an official devaluation of the Venezuelan currency, the Bolivar, in February 2013 which resulted in the recognition of a devaluation loss of $0.6 million during the year ended May 31, 2013. Management is closely monitoring currency valuation developments in Venezuela. If further devaluations occur in fiscal year 2014, we will incur further impairments of our investment in Venezuela. We hold certain floating-rate obligations. We are exposed to market risk primarily related to potential increases in interest rates related to our debt. ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Our financial statements and financial statement schedules, found at the end of this annual report on Form 10-K, are incorporated herein by reference. 26 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE There have been no disagreements concerning accounting and financial disclosures with our independent accountants during any of the periods presented. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Limitations on effectiveness of control. Our management, including the principal executive and financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of our control system reflects the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of such controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control failures and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by individual acts, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of management’s assessments of the current effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting are subject to risks. However, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of our control system are met. Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). This evaluation included consideration of the various processes carried out under the direction of our disclosure committee in an effort to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. This evaluation also considered the work completed relating to our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of May 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. 27 Internal control over financial reporting can also be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. We have used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2013. Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm The attestation report of KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on page 31 and is incorporated herein by reference. Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-13(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act) that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2013. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 28 PART III The information for the following items of Part III has been omitted from this Report on Form 10-K since we will file, not later than 120 days following the close of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, our Definitive Proxy Statement. The information required by Part III will be included in that proxy statement and such information is hereby incorporated by reference, with the exception of the information under the headings “Compensation Committee Report.” ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 29 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) 1. Financial Statements The financial statements and notes thereto can be found on the following pages: Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 30 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries: We have audited Team Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Team Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Team Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2013, and our report dated August 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. (signed) KPMG LLP Houston, Texas August 12, 2013 31 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Team, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Team, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated August 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. (signed) KPMG LLP Houston, Texas August 12, 2013 32 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except share and per share data) May 31, 2013 2012 Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receivables, net of allowance of $5,438 and $4,405 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34,201 172,108 26,507 5,321 8,781 $ 22,477 157,625 24,986 5,157 8,430 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $9,039 and $5,658 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill Other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246,918 74,939 5,207 25,950 103,466 2,907 816 218,675 62,041 5,830 18,508 95,002 3,081 651 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $460,203 $403,788 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,411 49,165 1,228 72,804 17,166 72,946 5,097 18,427 38,492 4,737 61,656 11,259 85,872 — Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168,013 158,787 Commitments and contingencies Equity: Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized, none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, par value $0.30 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 20,587,808 and 19,954,996 shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock at cost, 89,569 and 89,569 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Team shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-controlling interest — — 6,176 99,278 184,485 (1,789) (1,344) 286,806 5,384 5,985 85,801 152,049 (2,587) (1,344) 239,904 5,097 Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292,190 245,001 Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $460,203 $403,788 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 33 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in thousands, except per share data) Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $714,311 501,346 $623,740 428,689 $508,020 350,877 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212,965 158,355 992 195,051 139,737 1,183 157,143 115,698 1,030 Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-down of property costs (see Note 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Provision for income taxes (see Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Income attributable to non-controlling interest 55,602 2,734 — 943 51,925 19,211 32,714 278 56,497 2,380 1,658 (31) 52,490 19,422 33,068 157 42,475 2,156 — 147 40,172 13,548 26,624 39 Net income available to Team shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 32,436 $ 32,911 $ 26,585 Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per share: Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 1.61 1.53 $ $ 1.67 1.59 $ $ 1.38 1.32 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 34 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in thousands) Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency hedge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax provision attributable to other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,714 1,070 (674) 411 $33,068 (8,264) 2,385 318 $26,624 8,349 (2,587) (367) Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Total comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest 33,521 287 27,507 114 32,019 66 Total comprehensive income available to Team shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $33,234 $27,393 $31,953 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 35 l a t o T d e t a l u m u c c A r e h t O n o N l a n o i t i d d A ’ s r e d l o h e r a h S e v i s n e h e r p m o C y t i u q E ) s s o L ( e m o c n I d e n i a t e R s g n i n r a E g n i l l o r t n o C t s e r e t n I n i d i a P l a t i p a C y r u s a e r T n o m m o C y r u s a e r T n o m m o C k c o t S k c o t S s e r a h S s e r a h S S E I R A I D I S B U S D N A . C N I , M A E T Y T I U Q E ’ S R E D L O H E R A H S F O S T N E M E T A T S D E T A D I L O S N O C ) s d n a s u o h t n i ( 1 8 9 , 6 4 2 6 , 6 2 ) 6 8 5 , 1 ( ) 4 4 3 , 1 ( 2 5 5 , 7 — ) 3 3 4 ( 3 9 9 , 4 1 5 5 2 3 2 , 2 ) 6 1 3 , 1 ( ) 8 1 0 , 7 ( 8 6 0 , 3 3 7 5 4 , 1 6 4 4 , 9 0 2 — ) 8 6 8 ( 6 8 3 , 4 7 9 9 , 2 3 3 5 , 1 0 0 2 , 1 4 1 7 , 2 3 1 0 0 , 5 4 2 ) 3 9 3 ( — 1 3 9 , 3 ) 4 3 5 , 1 ( 5 7 2 , 8 6 9 9 , 2 2 9 1 , 5 6 1 $ — 1 8 9 , 6 ) 6 8 5 , 1 ( ) 7 3 4 , 2 ( $ ) 7 2 ( — — — — — — — 1 3 9 , 2 — ) 8 1 0 , 7 ( 7 5 4 , 1 3 4 — — — — ) 7 8 5 , 2 ( — ) 9 ( ) 3 9 3 ( 0 0 2 , 1 — — — — — — — — ) 9 3 ( — — — — — — — ) 7 5 1 ( — — — — 8 6 0 , 3 3 8 3 1 , 9 1 1 — — ) 8 7 2 ( — — — — 4 1 7 , 2 3 9 4 0 , 2 5 1 3 5 5 , 2 9 4 2 6 , 6 2 $ — — — — — 6 6 7 1 9 , 4 — — — — — $ 0 8 3 , 9 6 $ — — — — 9 7 5 , 2 — ) 8 5 4 ( 3 9 9 , 4 1 5 5 8 3 1 , 2 ) 6 1 3 , 1 ( — — — — ) 4 4 3 , 1 ( — — — — — — — — — — — 6 5 — — 5 2 4 9 — — $ 6 9 6 , 5 $ — — — — ) 0 9 ( — — — — — — — — — — — 6 8 1 — — 5 8 2 1 3 — — 8 8 9 , 8 1 — — — 4 1 1 — — — — — — — — ) 9 9 8 ( 6 8 3 , 4 4 1 9 , 2 3 3 5 , 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 3 3 8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6 0 1 8 7 2 — 3 8 9 , 4 7 6 8 , 7 7 ) 4 4 3 , 1 ( 1 7 8 , 5 ) 0 9 ( 1 7 5 , 9 1 7 9 0 , 5 1 0 8 , 5 8 ) 4 4 3 , 1 ( 5 8 9 , 5 ) 0 9 ( 5 5 9 , 9 1 — — — 7 8 2 — — — — — — — — 1 3 9 , 3 ) 2 7 5 , 1 ( 2 2 1 , 8 6 9 9 , 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 8 3 3 5 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4 2 1 9 0 5 — 0 9 1 , 2 9 2 $ ) 9 8 7 , 1 ( $ 5 8 4 , 4 8 1 $ 4 8 3 , 5 $ 8 7 2 , 9 9 $ ) 4 4 3 , 1 ( $ 6 7 1 , 6 $ ) 0 9 ( 8 8 5 , 0 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 1 0 2 , 1 3 y a M t a e c n a l a B . . . . . . . . . . . e m o c n i t e N x a t f o t e n , t n e m t s u j d a n o i t a l s n a r t y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x a t . . . . . . . . f o . . t e n , e g d e h y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F . k c o t s y r u s a e r t f o e s a h c r u P y t i r g e t n I t s e u Q f o n o i t i s i u q c A t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n o t e l b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x a t f o t e n , e g d e h y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F x a t f o t e n , t n e m t s u j d a n o i t a l s n a r t y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n o i t a s n e p m o c h s a c - n o N s d r a w a k c o t s f o g n i t s e V s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x E s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x e f o t i f e n e b x a T . . . . . . . . . ) 8 e t o N e e s ( r o r r e x a t f o n o i t c e r r o C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 0 2 , 1 3 y a M t a e c n a l a B . . . . . . . . . . . e m o c n i t e N 36 t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n o t e l b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n o i t a s n e p m o c h s a c - n o N s d r a w a k c o t s f o g n i t s e V s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x E s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x e f o t i f e n e b x a T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 0 2 , 1 3 y a M t a e c n a l a B . . . . . . . . . . . e m o c n i t e N . . . . . . . . . . . . . x a t f o t e n , e g d e h y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F x a t f o t e n , t n e m t s u j d a n o i t a l s n a r t y c n e r r u c n g i e r o F t s e r e t n i g n i l l o r t n o c - n o n o t e l b a t u b i r t t a e m o c n i e v i s n e h e r p m o C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n o i t a s n e p m o c h s a c - n o N s d r a w a k c o t s f o g n i t s e V s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x E s n o i t p o k c o t s f o e s i c r e x e f o t i f e n e b x a T . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1 0 2 , 1 3 y a M t a e c n a l a B . s t n e m e t a t s l a i c n a n i f d e t a d i l o s n o c o t s e t o n g n i y n a p m o c c a e e S TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating $ 32,714 $ 33,068 $ 26,624 activities: Earnings from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on asset disposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of deferred loan costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency loss (gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-down of property costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash compensation cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease: (992) 19,664 193 222 943 5,089 — 3,931 (1,183) 17,469 (21) 283 (31) (717) 1,658 4,386 (1,030) 14,584 437 303 147 (1,405) — 4,993 Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10,964) (1,405) 443 (16,990) (3,629) (559) (25,048) (1,231) (1,320) Increase (decrease): Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,210 7,779 (2,184) (5,965) 6,871 2,012 3,578 8,070 (222) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,643 36,652 28,480 Cash flows from investing activities: Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions from joint venture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase in other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (26,068) 758 (18,589) 1,000 — (23,924) 220 (19,351) 800 (9) (13,158) — (41,376) 750 (158) Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (42,899) (42,264) (53,942) Cash flows from financing activities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Payment) borrowings under revolving credit agreement, net Debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payments related to term and auto notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payment related to withholding tax for share-based payment arrangements . . . . Corporate tax effect from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock from share-based payment arrangements . . . . . . . . . Purchase of treasury stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Effect of exchange rate changes on cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (13,600) — — (1,534) 2,996 8,275 — (3,863) (157) 11,724 22,477 12,707 (799) (235) (868) 1,533 2,997 — 15,335 (1,324) 8,399 14,078 25,437 — (343) (433) 551 2,230 (1,344) 26,098 832 1,468 12,610 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34,201 $ 22,477 $ 14,078 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,615 $ 12,926 $ 2,315 $ 16,474 $ 2,100 $ 14,034 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 37 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Team, Inc. and our majority- owned subsidiaries where we have control over operating and financial policies. Investments in affiliates in which we have the ability to exert significant influence over operating and financial policies, but where we do not control the operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of estimates. Our accounting policies conform to GAAP. Our most significant accounting policies are described below. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported financial position and results of operations. We review significant estimates and judgments affecting our consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis and record the effect of any necessary adjustments prior to their publication. Estimates and judgments are based on information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Adjustments made with respect to the use of these estimates and judgments often relate to information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and judgments are inherent in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates and judgments are used in, among other things, (1) aspects of revenue recognition, (2) valuation of tangible and intangible assets and subsequent assessments for possible impairment, (3) the fair value of the non-controlling interest in subsidiaries that are not wholly-owned, (4) estimating various factors used to accrue liabilities for workers’ compensation, auto, medical and general liability, (5) establishing an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, (6) estimating the useful lives of our assets and (7) assessing future tax exposure and the realization of tax assets. Fair value of financial instruments. Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt obligations. The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable are representative of their respective fair values due to the short- term maturity of these instruments. The fair value of our banking facility is representative of the carrying value based upon the variable terms and management’s opinion that the current rates available to us with the same maturity and security structure are equivalent to that of the banking facility. Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of all demand deposits and funds invested in highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. Inventory. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventory includes material, labor and certain fixed overhead costs. Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their respective useful life or the lease term. Depreciation and amortization of assets are computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: Classification Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Computers and computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Automobiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Useful Life 20-40 years 2-15 years 2-12 years 2-10 years 2-5 years 2-5 years 38 Revenue recognition. We determine our revenue recognition guidelines for our operations guidance provided in applicable accounting standards and positions adopted by the FASB or the SEC. Most of our projects are short- term in nature and we predominantly derive revenues by providing a variety of industrial services on a time and material basis. For all of these services our revenues are recognized when services are rendered or when product is shipped to the job site and risk of ownership passes to the customer. However, due to various contractual terms with our customers, at the end of any reporting period, there may be earned but unbilled revenue that is accrued to properly match revenues with related costs. At May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, the amount of earned but unbilled revenue included in accounts receivable was $25.5 million and $20.6 million, respectively. Goodwill, intangible assets, and non-controlling interest. Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but are instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of the FASB ASC 350. Intangible assets with estimated useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Through fiscal year 2013 we operated in only one segment—the industrial services segment (see Note 14). Within the industrial services segment, we were organized as two divisions. Our TCM division provides the services of inspection and assessment and field heat treating. Our TMS division provides the services of leak repair, fugitive emissions hot tapping, field machining, technical bolting and field valve repair. Each division has goodwill relating to past acquisitions and we assess goodwill for impairment at the lower TCM and TMS divisional level. Our annual goodwill impairment test is conducted as of May 31 of each year, which is our fiscal year end. Conducting the impairment test as of May 31 of each fiscal year aligns with our annual budget process which is typically completed during the fourth quarter of each year. In addition, performing our annual goodwill impairment test as of this date allows for a thorough consideration of the valuations of our business units subsequent to the completion of our annual budget process but prior to our financial year end reporting date. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2011-08 at May 31, 2013, the annual impairment test for goodwill was a two-step process that involved comparing the estimated fair value of each business unit to the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a business unit exceeded its carrying amount, the goodwill of the business unit was not considered impaired; therefore, the second step of the impairment test was deemed unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a business unit exceeded its fair value, we would then perform a second step to the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recorded. Consistent with prior years tested, the fair values of reporting units in fiscal year 2011 was determined using a method based on discounted cash flow models with estimated cash flows based on internal forecasts of revenues and expenses over a four year period plus a terminal value period (the income approach). The income approach estimated fair value by discounting each reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows using a discount rate that approximated both our weighted-average cost of capital and reflects current market conditions. The fair value derived from the income approach in our fiscal year 2011 test for impairment, in the aggregate, approximated our market capitalization. At May 31, 2011, our market capitalization exceeded the carrying value of our consolidated net assets by approximately $250 million, or 117%, and the fair value of both our individual reporting units significantly exceeded their respective carrying amounts as of that date. Projected growth rates and other market inputs to our impairment test models, such as the discount rate, are sensitive to the risk of future variances due to market conditions as well as business unit execution risks. Consequently, if future results fall below our forward-looking projections for an extended period of time, the results of future impairment tests could indicate an impairment. Although we believe the cash flow projections in our income approach make reasonable assumptions about our business, a significant increase in competition or reduction in our competitive capabilities could have a significant adverse impact on our ability to retain market share and thus on the projected margins included in the income approach used to value our reporting units. We periodically reviewed our projected growth rates and other market inputs used in our impairment test models as well as changes in our business and other factors that could represent indicators of impairment. Subsequent to our May 31, 2011 annual impairment test, no such indicators of impairment were identified. 39 On May 31, 2012, we adopted ASU 2011-08 which requires reporting entities to assess relevant events and circumstances in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of goodwill. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount, then the first and second steps of the goodwill impairment test are not necessary. We evaluated considerations under ASU 2011-08 such as macroeconomic effects on our business, industry and market considerations, cost factors that could have a negative effect on cash flows or earnings, overall financial performance, entity-specific events, events affecting reporting units, and any realization of a sustained decrease in the price of our stock. After consideration of the aforementioned events and circumstances, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit was greater than the carrying amount of goodwill. Accordingly, we did not perform the two-step process described above for our fiscal year 2012 and 2013 annual tests. There was $103.5 million and $95.0 million of goodwill at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, respectively. A summary of goodwill is as follows (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2012 TCM Division TMS Division Total TCM Division TMS Division Total Balance at beginning of year . . . Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency adjustments . . . $75,131 9,009 195 $19,871 (1,221) 481 $ 95,002 7,788 676 $76,872 — (1,741) $12,648 8,926 (1,703) $89,520 8,926 (3,444) Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . $84,335 $19,131 $103,466 $75,131 $19,871 $95,002 Income taxes. We follow the guidance of ASC 740 which requires that we use the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes and provide deferred income taxes for all significant temporary differences. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax payable and related tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain items, such as depreciation, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences can result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized, and, to the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, we must establish a valuation allowance. We consider all available evidence to determine whether, based on the weight of the evidence, a valuation allowance is needed. Evidence used includes information about our current financial position and our results of operations for the current and preceding years, as well as all currently available information about future years, including our anticipated future performance, the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and tax planning strategies. Workers’ compensation, auto, medical and general liability accruals. In accordance with ASC 450 we record a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We review our loss contingencies on an ongoing basis to ensure that we have appropriate reserves recorded on our balance sheet. These reserves are based on historical experience with claims incurred but not received, estimates and judgments made by management, applicable insurance coverage for litigation matters, and are adjusted as circumstances warrant. For workers’ compensation, our self-insured retention is $1.0 million and our automobile liability self-insured retention is currently $500,000 per occurrence. For general liability claims we have an effective self-insured retention of $3.0 million per occurrence. For medical claims, our self-insured retention is $175,000 per individual claimant determined on an annual basis. For environmental liability claims, our self-insured retention is $500,000 per occurrence. We maintain insurance for claims that exceed such self-retention limits. The insurance is subject to terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions that may not fully compensate us for all losses. Our estimates and judgments could change based on new information, changes in laws or regulations, changes in management’s plans or intentions, or the outcome of legal proceedings, settlements or other factors. If different estimates and judgments were applied with respect to these matters, it is likely that reserves would be recorded for different amounts. 40 Allowance for doubtful accounts. In the ordinary course of business, a percentage of our accounts receivable are not collected due to billing disputes, customer bankruptcies, dissatisfaction with the services we performed and other various reasons. We establish an allowance to account for those accounts receivable that will eventually be deemed uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a combination of our historical experience and management’s review of long outstanding accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated revenues. Earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to Team shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to Team shareholders, less income or loss for the period attributable to the non-controlling interest, by the sum of, (1) the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, (2) the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of share-based compensation using the treasury stock method and (3) the dilutive effect of the assumed conversion of our non- controlling interest to our common stock (see Note 2). Amounts used in basic and diluted earnings per share, for all periods presented, are as follows (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Weighted-average number of basic shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options, stock units and performance awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Assumed conversion of non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,203 759 204 19,667 758 235 19,206 728 149 Total shares and dilutive securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,166 20,660 20,083 There were zero, 617,500 and 743,000 options to purchase shares of common stock outstanding during the twelve month periods ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common shares during the periods. Foreign currency. For subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. Dollar, assets and liabilities are translated at period ending rates of exchange and revenues and expenses are translated at period average exchange rates. Translation adjustments for the asset and liability accounts are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in our statement of income. Effective December 1, 2009, we began to account for Venezuela as a highly-inflationary economy and the effect of all subsequent currency fluctuations between the Bolivar and the U.S. Dollar are recorded in our statement of income (see Note 16). Newly Adopted Accounting Principles ASU 2011-05. In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. This update requires the presentation of the components of net income and other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. In addition, companies are also required to present reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update to defer the effective date for presentation of reclassification of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income. These updates are effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. This update was adopted by Team on June 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. 41 ASU 2011-04. In May 2011, an update regarding fair value measurement was issued to conform the definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The standard also clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and expands the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable Level 3 inputs. The standard update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Accounting Principles Not Yet Adopted ASU 2011-11. In December 2011, an update was issued related to new disclosures on offsetting assets and liabilities of financial and derivative instruments. The amendments require the disclosure of gross asset and liability amounts, amounts offset on the balance sheet and amounts subject to the offsetting requirements, but not offset on the balance sheet. This standard does not amend the existing guidance on when it is appropriate to offset. The standard update is effective for annual periods beginning after January 1, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. 2. ACQUISITIONS In August 2012, Team’s subsidiary, Quest Integrity, acquired a specialty remote digital video inspection company based in New Zealand for approximately $3.0 million in cash. Based upon the completed purchase price allocation, we have recorded $0.7 million in fixed assets, $1.1 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships, $0.3 million in intangible assets classified as non-compete agreements and $0.9 million in goodwill. In September 2012, Team also acquired the common stock of TCI for approximately $23.2 million, of which $16.5 million was cash paid and $6.7 million was deferred payments. TCI is a company based in Oklahoma specializing in the inspection and repair of above ground storage tanks. Based upon the completed purchase price allocation associated with the TCI acquisition, we recorded $4.1 million in net working capital, $2.6 million in fixed assets, $6.7 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships, $1.1 million in intangible assets classified as trade name, $8.6 million in goodwill, $1.0 million in other current liabilities and $5.7 million in other long-term liabilities. The $1.0 million in other current liabilities and $5.7 million in other long-term liabilities represent future consideration to be paid, of which $1.9 million is an estimate of contingent payments to be made based upon the future performance criteria of TCI and the remainder is due in annual installments of $1.0 million beginning in September 2013. The combined unaudited annual revenues for both acquired businesses are approximately $24 million based upon their most recently completed fiscal years, and the total consideration for both was approximately $26 million, subject to adjustments for working capital true-ups and the future performance of the businesses. As a result of the two business acquisitions, we expect to be able to deduct $6.7 million of the goodwill recognized for tax purposes. Of the $8.6 million of TCI goodwill, $1.9 million is contingent consideration and will be considered deductible when paid. In fiscal year 2012, we completed two small acquisitions for a total of $19.4 million which were recorded as $1.2 million in net working capital, $3.0 million in fixed assets, $7.5 million in intangible assets classified as customer relationships and $7.7 million in goodwill. Both acquisitions were financed through borrowings on our Credit Facility. We performed purchase price allocations based on our most current assessments of fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. We completed a final valuation report of intangibles and goodwill associated with these transactions during the first half of fiscal year 2013. The final purchase price allocation associated with both of these transactions did not result in material adjustments and, accordingly, no retrospective adjustments were made in the accompanying 2012 financial statements. On November 3, 2010, we purchased Quest Integrity, a privately held advanced inspection services and engineering assessment company. We effectively purchased 95% of Quest Integrity for a total consideration paid to Quest Integrity shareholders of $41.7 million, consisting of a cash payment of $39.1 million and the issuance of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $2.6 million (approximately 186,000 shares). Additionally, 42 we also assumed debt, net of cash on hand, with a value of $2.3 million. We repaid the debt upon consummation of the purchase. In connection with this transaction, we borrowed $41.4 million under our Credit Facility which was used to fund the cash portion of the purchase price, including the retirement of Quest Integrity debt. We expect to purchase the remaining 5% in fiscal year 2015 for a purchase consideration based upon the future financial performance of Quest Integrity as defined in the purchase agreement. Future consideration would be payable in unregistered shares of our common stock for an aggregate value of no less than $2.4 million, provided the aggregate value of the consideration does not exceed 20% of our outstanding common stock. Our valuation of the remaining 5% equity of Quest Integrity at the date of acquisition was $4.9 million, which is reflected in the shareholders’ equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Non-controlling interest.” Headquartered near Seattle, Washington, Quest Integrity has leading technical capabilities related to the measurement and assessment of facility and pipeline mechanical integrity. Quest Integrity has developed several proprietary tools for advanced tube and pipeline inspection and measurement. Supporting and augmenting these proprietary inspection tools, Quest Integrity has an advanced technical team that provides specialized engineering assessments of facility conditions and serviceability. Quest Integrity maintains operations in Seattle, Boulder, and New Zealand, and has service locations in Houston, Calgary, Australia, The Netherlands, and the Middle East. The results of Quest Integrity are reflected in our TCM division. 3. RECEIVABLES A summary of accounts receivable as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): Trade accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unbilled revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $152,030 25,516 (5,438) $141,469 20,561 (4,405) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $172,108 $157,625 May 31, 2013 2012 The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is remote. The following summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts as of May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write-off of bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,405 2,922 (1,889) $ 4,222 1,650 (1,467) $ 4,934 1,048 (1,760) Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,438 $ 4,405 $ 4,222 4. INVENTORY A summary of inventory as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,460 845 22,202 $ 3,529 937 20,520 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $26,507 $24,986 May 31, 2013 2012 43 5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT A summary of property, plant and equipment as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): May 31, 2013 2012 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Computers and computer software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Automobiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,108 18,445 137,439 4,469 8,871 3,842 3,816 $ 1,285 15,095 121,533 2,246 7,980 2,624 1,912 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . 179,990 (105,051) 152,675 (90,634) Property, plant, and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74,939 $ 62,041 Depreciation expense for fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $16.2 million, $14.9 million, and $13.6 million, respectively. In the fourth quarter of the year ended May 31, 2012, we incurred a $1.7 million charge to write-off development costs capitalized through 2009 related to a planned new headquarters, manufacturing, equipment and training facility that was to have been constructed on an approximately 50 acre tract of land in Houston, Texas that was acquired in 2007. The charge was due to management’s decision not to pursue the development of the site. Instead, our former corporate headquarters facility in Alvin, Texas was repurposed as a technical center for operations support and the corporate headquarters was relocated to a leased commercial office space in Sugar Land, Texas, a suburb of Houston. 6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS A summary of intangible assets as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): May 31, 2013 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21,418 3,701 Non-compete agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,075 Trade names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,112 Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(4,168) (3,232) (424) (1,166) (49) Net Carrying Amount $17,250 469 3,651 3,946 634 Gross Carrying Amount $12,198 3,136 2,962 5,112 758 May 31, 2012 Accumulated Amortization $(1,973) (2,844) (207) (634) — Net Carrying Amount $10,225 292 2,755 4,478 758 $34,989 $(9,039) $25,950 $24,166 $(5,658) $18,508 Amortization expense for fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $3.4 million, $2.6 million, and $1.0 million, respectively. Amortization expense for current intangible assets is forecasted to be approximately $3.6 million per year through fiscal year 2018. 44 7. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES A summary of other accrued liabilities as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): Payroll and other compensation expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, sales and other non-income related taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,093 5,385 2,385 9,302 $27,871 4,388 1,966 4,267 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $49,165 $38,492 May 31, 2013 2012 8. INCOME TAXES For the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we were taxed on income from continuing operations at an effective tax rate of 37%, 37% and 38%, respectively. Our income tax provision for May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $19.2 million, $19.4 million and $13.5 million, respectively, and include federal, state and foreign taxes. The components of our tax provision were as follows (in thousands): Year ended May 31, 2013: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. Federal State & local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended May 31, 2012: U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State & local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year ended May 31, 2011: U.S. Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State & local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current Deferred Total $ 7,947 1,847 4,328 $ 4,873 236 (20) $12,820 2,083 4,308 $14,122 $ 5,089 $19,211 $10,918 1,880 7,378 $ 379 62 (1,195) $11,297 1,942 6,183 $20,176 $ (754) $19,422 $ 8,546 1,676 4,872 $ (984) 24 (586) $ 7,562 1,700 4,286 $15,094 $(1,546) $13,548 The components of pre-tax income for the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in thousands): Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $37,445 14,480 $31,984 20,506 $27,641 12,531 $51,925 $52,490 $40,172 Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 45 Income tax expense attributable to income differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate of 35% to pre-tax income from continuing operations as a result of the following (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 2011 Pre-tax income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $51,925 $52,490 $40,172 Computed income taxes at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign tax differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Production activity deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-deductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18,174 1,570 (363) (113) 473 (340) — (190) $18,371 1,342 (471) (161) 470 (233) — 104 $14,060 1,135 (326) (178) 350 (197) (1,682) 386 Total provision for income tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19,211 $19,422 $13,548 The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below (in thousands): May 31, 2013 2012 Deferred tax assets: Accrued compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss carry forwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,819 1,686 598 3,671 175 1,158 Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill and intangible costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation and other equity adjustments . . . . Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,107 (65) 11,042 (12,548) (5,308) (261) (1,973) (1,263) (718) $ 4,386 1,330 598 4,755 242 818 12,129 — 12,129 (9,798) (4,406) (672) (420) (1,518) (766) Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (22,071) (17,580) Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(11,029) $ (5,451) As of May 31, 2013, we had no material valuation allowance reducing our deferred tax assets. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon various sources of taxable income prescribed by ASC 740, against which future deductible temporary differences can be deducted. We consider future reversals of existing temporary differences, projected taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this determination. 46 As of May 31, 2013, we had net operating loss carry forwards totaling $0.4 million that were expected to be realized in fiscal year 2013. Of this amount $0.1 million will expire in fiscal year 2022, $0.3 million has an unlimited life. At May 31, 2013, undistributed earnings of foreign operations totaling $14.4 million were considered to be permanently reinvested. We have recognized no deferred tax liability for the remittance of such earnings to the U.S. since it is our intention to utilize those earnings in the foreign operations. Generally, such earnings become subject to U.S. tax upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of deferred tax liability on such undistributed earnings. At May 31, 2013, we have established liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $0.7 million, inclusive of interest and penalties. To the extent these uncertainties are ultimately resolved favorably, the resulting reduction of recorded liabilities would have an effect on our effective tax rate. In accordance with ASC 740-10 our policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits through the tax provision. We file income tax returns in the U.S. with federal and state jurisdictions as well as various foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. Federal, state and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2010. The income tax laws and regulations are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As such, we are required to make certain subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our tax positions that may have a material effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. We believe, however, that there is appropriate support for the income tax positions taken, and to be taken, on our returns, and that our accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open tax years based on an assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter. Set forth below is a reconciliation of the changes in our unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions (in thousands): Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additions based on tax positions related to the current year . . . . . Additions based on tax positions related to prior years . . . . . . . . . Reductions resulting from a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at end of year Ended May 31 2013 $ 624 — 191 2012 $ 421 326 — 2011 $321 112 — (118) $ 697 (123) $ 624 (12) $421 We believe that in the next 12 months it is reasonably possible $0.1 million of liabilities recorded for tax uncertainties will be effectively settled. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company identified and corrected accounting errors relating to the effect of share-based compensation on tax provisions for fiscal years 2007 through 2010 and the first two quarters of fiscal year 2011. During those periods, reported earnings were understated because effective tax rates were overstated as a result of the previously undetected errors in the tax provision calculation. No restatement of previously issued financial statements was required because the effect on those statements was immaterial. The cumulative effect of the errors in the tax provision calculation was a tax benefit, which was recorded in fiscal year 2011. Recent Legislation The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law on January 2, 2013 and includes an extension for one year of the 50% bonus depreciation allowance. The provision specifically applies to qualifying property placed in service before January 1, 2014. The acceleration of deductions for the year ended May 31, 47 2013 on qualifying capital expenditures resulting from the bonus depreciation provision had no impact on our current period effective tax rate because the acceleration of deductions does not result in permanent differences between asset bases for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes. The act also reinstated the research and development credit retroactively from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. This change in legislation resulted in a permanent decrease in income tax expense for the year ended May 31, 2013 of $0.5 million. 9. LONG-TERM DEBT, DERIVATIVES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT In fiscal year 2012, we renewed our banking credit facility with our banking syndicate. The Credit Facility has borrowing capacity of up to $150 million in multiple currencies, is secured by virtually all of our domestic assets and a majority of the stock of our foreign subsidiaries and matures in July of 2016. In connection with the renewal, we capitalized $0.8 million of associated debt issuance costs which will be amortized over the life of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.75% and has commitment fees of 0.30% on unused borrowing capacity. Future maturities of long-term debt, reflecting the Credit Facility are as follows (in thousands): Fiscal Year 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — — — 72,946 — — $72,946 In order to secure our casualty insurance programs we are required to post letters of credit generally issued by a bank as collateral. A letter of credit commits the issuer to remit specified amounts to the holder, if the holder demonstrates that we failed to meet our obligations under the letter of credit. If this were to occur, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer for any payments the issuer was required to remit to the holder of the letter of credit. We were contingently liable for outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaling $13.1 million and $13.5 million at May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Outstanding letters of credit reduce amounts available under our Credit Facility and are considered as having been funded for purposes of calculating our financial covenants under the Credit Facility. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) established accounting and reporting standards requiring that derivative instruments be recorded at fair value and included in the balance sheet as assets or liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation, which is established at the inception date of a derivative. Special accounting for derivatives qualifying as fair value hedges allows a derivative’s gains and losses to offset related results on the hedged item in the statement of income. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value, to the extent the hedge is effective, are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Hedge effectiveness is measured at least quarterly based on the relative cumulative changes in fair value between the derivative contract and the hedged item over time. Credit risks related to derivatives include the possibility that the counterparty will not fulfill the terms of the contract. We considered counterparty credit risk to our derivative contracts when valuing our derivative instruments. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on 48 the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. Any ineffectiveness related to our hedges was not material for any of the periods presented. Our borrowing of €12.3 million under the Credit Facility serves as an economic hedge of our net investment in our European operations as fluctuations in the fair value of the borrowing attributable to the U.S. Dollar/Euro spot rate will offset translation gains or losses attributable to our investment in our European operations. At May 31, 2013, the €12.3 million borrowing had a U.S. Dollar value of $16.0 million. The amounts recognized in other comprehensive income, and reclassified into income, for the twelve months ended May 31, 2013 and 2012, are as follows (in thousands): Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 2012 Euro denominated long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(674) $2,385 Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income to Earnings Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 $ — 2012 $ — The following table presents the fair value totals and balance sheet classification for derivatives and non- derivative instruments designated as hedges under ASC 815 (in thousands): May 31, 2013 May 31, 2012 Classification Balance Sheet Location Fair Value Classification Balance Sheet Location Fair Value Euro denominated long- term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liability Long-term debt $2,004 Liability Long-term debt $2,678 We enter into operating leases to rent facilities and obtain vehicles and equipment for our field operations. Our obligations under non-cancellable operating leases, primarily consisting of facility and auto leases, were approximately $58.2 million at May 31, 2013 and are as follows (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter Operating Leases $14,736 12,055 9,068 5,466 3,533 13,383 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $58,241 Total rent expense resulting from operating leases for the twelve months ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $23.5 million, $20.5 million and $18.8 million, respectively. 10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Effective June 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), which among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. 49 As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best information available. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value determinations in situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy such that “Level 1” measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market, “Level 2” measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and “Level 3” measurements include those that are unobservable and of a highly subjective measure. The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, respectively. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (in thousands): May 31, 2013 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Liabilities: Euro denominated long-term debt . . . . . . . . . $ — $2,004 $ — $2,004 May 31, 2012 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Liabilities: Euro denominated long-term debt . . . . . . . . . $ — $2,678 $ — $2,678 11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION We have adopted stock incentive plans and other arrangements pursuant to which our Board may grant stock options, restricted stock, stock units, stock appreciation rights, common stock or performance awards to officers, directors and key employees. At May 31, 2013, there were approximately 1.4 million stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards outstanding to officers, directors and key employees. The exercise price, terms and other conditions applicable to each form of share-based compensation under our plans is generally determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board at the time of grant and may vary. Our share-based payments consist primarily of stock options, stock units, common stock and performance awards. The governance of our share-based compensation does not directly limit the number of future awards. However, the total number of shares ultimately issued may not exceed the total number of shares cumulatively authorized, which is 7,120,000 at May 31, 2013. Shares issued in connection with our share-based compensation are issued out of authorized but unissued common stock. Compensation expense related to share-based compensation totaled $3.9 million, $4.4 million and $5.0 million for the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 50 2011, respectively. The tax benefit related to share-based compensation was $3.0 million, $1.5 million and $0.6 million for the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At May 31, 2013, $7.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to share-based compensation is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.7 years. We determine the fair value of each stock option at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model and recognize the resulting expense of our stock option awards over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the awards, usually the vesting period. There was no compensation expense related to stock options for the year ended May 31, 2013 as all stock options were fully vested as of the beginning of the year. Compensation expense related to stock options totaled $0.8 million and $2.4 million in 2012 and 2011. Our options typically vest in equal annual installments over a four year service period. Expense related to an option grant is recognized on a straight line basis over the specified vesting period for those options. Stock options generally have a ten year term. Transactions involving our stock options during the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized below: Year Ended May 31, 2013 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Year Ended May 31, 2011 No. of Options Weighted Average Exercise Price No. of Options Weighted Average Exercise Price No. of Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Shares under option, beginning of year . . . Changes during the year: (in thousands) 1,562 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (509) (1) — Shares under option, end of year . . . . . . . . Exercisable at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,052 1,052 $18.95 $ — $16.25 $30.33 $ — $20.24 $20.24 (in thousands) 1,856 — (278) (2) (14) 1,562 1,562 $17.81 $ — $10.77 $30.33 $30.33 $18.95 $18.95 (in thousands) 2,213 — (329) (13) (15) 1,856 1,711 $16.50 $ — $ 8.08 $30.33 $26.56 $17.81 $16.75 Options exercisable at May 31, 2013 had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 3.5 years. For total options outstanding at May 31, 2013, the range of exercise prices and remaining contractual lives are as follows: Range of Prices $6.42 to $9.62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9.63 to $12.82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12.83 to $16.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16.04 to $32.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. of Options (in thousands) 122 157 308 465 1,052 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 8.92 $11.10 $14.56 $30.05 $20.24 Weighted Average Remaining Life (in years) 1.9 2.7 3.1 4.4 3.5 Performance awards are settled with common stock upon vesting unless it is not legally feasible to issue shares, in which case the value of the award is settled in cash. We determine the fair value of each performance award based on the market price on the date of grant. Performance awards granted to our Chairman of our Board vest over the longer of four years or the achievement of performance goals based upon our future results of operations. Compensation expense related to performance awards totaled $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 51 million for the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Transactions involving our performance awards during the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized below: Year Ended May 31, 2013 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Year Ended May 31, 2011 No. of Performance Awards Weighted Average Fair Value No. of Performance Awards Weighted Average Fair Value No. of Performance Awards Weighted Average Fair Value Performance awards, beginning of year . . . Changes during the year: Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Performance awards, end of year . . . . . . . . (in thousands) 64 19 (26) — 57 $21.86 $32.89 $22.04 $ — $25.47 (in thousands) 61 24 (21) — 64 $20.33 $25.16 $21.14 $ — $21.86 (in thousands) 51 25 (15) — 61 $20.84 $20.04 $21.61 $ — $20.33 Stock units are settled with common stock upon vesting unless it is not legally feasible to issue shares, in which case the value of the award is settled in cash. We determine the fair value of each stock unit based on the market price on the date of grant. Stock units generally vest in annual installments over four years and the expense associated with the units is recognized over the same resting period. We also grant common stock to our directors which typically vest immediately. Compensation expense related to stock units and director stock grants totaled $3.3 million, $3.0 million and $2.2 million for the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Transactions involving our stock units and director stock grants during the years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized below: Year Ended May 31, 2013 Year Ended May 31, 2012 Year Ended May 31, 2011 No. of Stock Units (in thousands) 342 141 (143) (11) 329 Weighted Average Fair Value $21.73 $32.81 $22.53 $23.58 $26.07 No. of Stock Units (in thousands) 310 159 (120) (7) 342 Weighted Average Fair Value $19.80 $24.78 $20.81 $21.27 $21.73 No. of Stock Units (in thousands) 247 167 (93) (11) 310 Weighted Average Fair Value $20.53 $18.99 $20.20 $20.50 $19.80 Stock and stock units, beginning of year . . . Changes during the year: Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested and settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock and stock units, end of year . . . . . . . . 12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Under the Team, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (the “Plan”), contributions are made to the Plan by qualified employees at their election and our matching contributions to the Plan are made at specified rates. Our contributions to the Plan in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, were approximately $3.7 million, $2.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Con Ed Matter—We have, from time to time, provided temporary leak repair services for the steam operations of Con Ed located in New York City. In July 2007, a Con Ed steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured causing one death and other injuries and property damage. As of May 31, 2013, ninety-five lawsuits have been filed against Con Ed, the City of New York and Team in the Supreme Courts of New York located in Kings, New York and Bronx County, alleging that our temporary leak repair services may have contributed to the cause of the rupture. The lawsuits seek generally unspecified compensatory damages for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. Additionally, on March 31, 2008, we received a 52 letter from Con Ed alleging that our contract with Con Ed requires us to indemnify and defend Con Ed for additional claims filed against Con Ed as a result of the rupture. Con Ed filed an action to join Team and the City of New York as defendants in all lawsuits filed against Con Ed that did not include Team and the City of New York as direct defendants. We are vigorously defending the lawsuits and Con Ed’s claim for indemnification. We are unable to estimate the amount of liability to us, if any, associated with these lawsuits and the claim for indemnification. We maintain insurance coverage, subject to a deductible limit of $250,000, which we believe should cover these claims. We have not accrued any liability in excess of the deductible limit for the lawsuits. We do not believe the ultimate outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. EPA Matter—As part of a plea agreement entered in July 2012, we pled guilty to a single misdemeanor violation of a section of the Clean Air Act related to fugitive emissions monitoring services provided to a customer serviced by our Borger, Texas office. As part of the plea agreement, we developed and are now implementing an environmental compliance plan for our emissions monitoring services to enhance our compliance with the Clean Air Act. Also as part of the plea agreement in November 2012, we were assessed a fine of $200,000 and placed on probation for a term of five years. We are involved in various other lawsuits and are subject to various claims and proceedings encountered in the normal conduct of business. In our opinion, any uninsured losses that might arise from these lawsuits and proceedings will not have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. 14. ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”) requires we disclose certain information about our operating segments where operating segments are defined as “components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.” Through July 1, 2013 we operated in only one segment—the industrial services segment. Within the industrial services segment, we were organized as two divisions. Our TCM division provided the services of inspection and assessment and field heat treating. Our TMS division provided the services of leak repair, fugitive emissions control, hot tapping, field machining, technical bolting and field valve repair. Each division has goodwill relating to past acquisitions and we assess goodwill for impairment at the lower TCM and TMS divisional level. Both divisions derive substantially all their revenues from providing specialized labor intensive industrial services and the market for their services is principally dictated by the population of process piping systems in industrial plants and facilities. Services provided by both the TCM and TMS divisions are predominantly provided through a network of field branch locations located in proximity to industrial plants. The structure of those branch locations is similar, with locations overseen by a branch/regional manager, one or more sales representatives and a cadre of technicians to service the business requirements of our customers. Both the TCM and TMS division field locations shared the same chief operating decision maker and both divisions were supported by common and often centralized technical and commercial support staffs, quality assurance, training, finance, legal, human resources and health and safety departments. Revenues and total assets in the United States and other countries are as follows for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands): Total Revenues Total Assets FY 2013 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other foreign countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $508,928 135,527 37,787 32,069 $334,579 68,164 35,734 21,726 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $714,311 $460,203 53 Total Revenues Total Assets FY 2012 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other foreign countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $438,413 121,865 36,448 27,014 $296,240 60,334 30,352 16,862 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $623,740 $403,788 FY 2011 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other foreign countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $361,996 99,888 28,059 18,077 $243,046 64,023 31,469 16,948 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $508,020 $355,486 Effective July 1, 2013, Team structured its business operations from the single Industrial Services segment into three separate reportable segments, namely IHT Group, MS Group, and Quest Integrity Group. Each business segment is headed by a business group president who reports to the CEO. As such, Team will begin to report three operating segments under ASC 280 beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The IHT Group segment will consist substantially of the same operations previously conducted in the TCM division other than Quest Integrity Group, the MS Group segment will consist substantially of the same operations previously conducted in the TMS division, and Quest Integrity Group will be a standalone segment. 15. UNCONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Our earnings from unconsolidated affiliates consists entirely of our joint venture (50% ownership) formed in May 2008, to perform non-destructive testing and inspection services in Alaska. The joint venture is an integral part of our operations in Alaska. Our investment in the net assets of the joint venture, accounted for using the equity method of accounting, was $1.8 million at May 31, 2013 and 2012. Revenues from the joint venture not reflected in our consolidated revenues were $13.5 million and $12.3 million as of May 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 16. VENEZUELA’S HIGHLY INFLATIONARY ECONOMY We operate a small service location in Punta Fijo, Venezuela, whose annual revenues have historically been less than one percent of our consolidated revenues for all periods presented. Because of the uncertain political environment in Venezuela, starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, we began to account for Venezuelan operations pursuant to accounting guidance for hyperinflationary economies. Following the designation of the Venezuelan economy as hyperinflationary, we ceased taking the effects of currency fluctuations to accumulated other comprehensive income and began reflecting all effects as a component of other income in our statement of operations. Prior to February 2013, we were using the Venezuelan central bank’s official published rate (5.30 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar) to translate Venezuelan assets into U.S. Dollars as no other legal rate was readily available. In February 2013, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation in its currency and created a new official exchange rate of 6.30 Bolivars per U.S. Dollar. As a result of the currency devaluation, we recognized a $0.6 million pre-tax foreign currency loss during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013. Management is closely monitoring currency valuation developments in Venezuela. If further devaluations occur in fiscal year 2014, we will incur further impairments of our investment in Venezuela. Due to the uncertain economic and political environment in Venezuela, it is very difficult to repatriate cash flows of these operations. At May 31, 2013, our Venezuelan subsidiary had $2.8 million of net assets, consisting primarily of Bolivar denominated cash equal to $1.2 million. 54 17. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME A summary of other comprehensive income included within shareholders’ equity as of May 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands): Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency hedge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax provision on other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31, 2013 May 31, 2012 $(3,532) 2,004 (261) $(1,789) $(4,593) 2,678 (672) $(2,587) The following table represents the related tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (in thousands): Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2013 Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2012 Twelve Months Ended May 31, 2011 Gross Amount Tax Effect Net Amount Gross Amount Tax Effect Net Amount Gross Amount Tax Effect Net Amount Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,070 $130 $1,200 (393) Foreign currency hedge . . . . . . . . . (674) 281 $(8,264) $1,246 $(7,018) $ 8,349 $(1,368) $ 6,981 (1,586) (2,587) 1,457 1,001 2,385 (928) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 396 $411 $ 807 $(5,879) $ 318 $(5,561) $ 5,762 $ (367) $ 5,395 18. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA The following is a summary of selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the years ended May 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands, except per share data): Year Ended May 31, 2013 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total Year Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) available to Team shareholders . . . Net income (loss) per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) per share: Diluted . . . . . . . . . . $161,492 $ 12,824 7,561 $ 0.38 $ 0.36 $ $201,196 $150,975 $200,648 609 $ 23,040 $ 19,129 $ (535) $ 11,474 $ 13,936 $ 0.57 (0.03) $ $ 0.69 $ 0.54 (0.03) $ $ 0.66 $ $714,311 $ 55,602 $ 32,436 1.61 $ 1.53 $ Year Ended May 31, 2012 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total Year Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income available to Team shareholders . . . . . . . . Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per share: Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $141,093 $ 11,755 6,794 $ 0.35 $ 0.33 $ $158,273 $ 17,080 $ 10,342 0.53 $ 0.50 $ $136,523 3,456 $ 2,011 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ $187,851 $ 24,206 $ 13,764 0.69 $ 0.66 $ $623,740 $ 56,497 $ 32,911 1.67 $ 1.59 $ 19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On July 19, 2013, subsequent to our year end, we acquired all of the stock of Global Ascent, Inc. (“Global Ascent”) for $10 million, subject to working capital adjustments, plus additional consideration of up to a maximum of $4 million based upon the future performance of Global Ascent over the next six years. The preliminary purchase price allocation is expected to result in the majority of the purchase price being allocated to goodwill and other intangible assets. Global Ascent is a leading provider of industrial rope access services and is headquartered in Fullerton, California. Global Ascent provides a range of basic and advanced non-destructive testing services and maintenance services to its clients in the energy and industrial markets primarily via rope access. Results for Global Ascent will be reported within our IHT Group beginning in our first quarter of fiscal year 2014. 55 3. Exhibits Exhibit Number 3.1 3.2 4.1 10.1† 10.2† 10.3† 10.4† 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 21 23.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 2, 2011). Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 2, 2011). Certificate representing shares of common stock of Company (filed as Exhibit 4(1) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-68928). Team, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Option and Award Plan dated June 24, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2004). Team, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated August 1, 2009) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2009). Form of Stock Unit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2008). Form of Performance-Based Stock Unit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2008). Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated November 2, 2010, by and among Team, Inc., TQ Acquisition, Inc., Quest Integrity Group, LLC, and John Zink Holdings, Inc., Ring Mountain Capital, LLC, Quest Integrated, Inc., Alexius Group II, LLC, Milton J. Altenberg and Todd Katz (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Form of Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated November 2, 2010, by and among Team, Inc., TQ Acquisition, Inc. and each of the other members of Quest Integrity Group, LLC listed on Exhibit A to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement dated November 2, 2010, by and among Team, Inc., TQ Acquisition, Inc., Quest Integrity Group, LLC, and John Zink Holdings, Inc., Ring Mountain Capital, LLC, Quest Integrated, Inc., Alexius Group II, LLC, Milton J. Altenberg and Todd Katz (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Form of Put-Call Option Agreement dated November 2, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Guaranty, dated as of November 2, 2010, made by KG Holding, LLC for the benefit of Team, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Guaranty, dated as of November 2, 2010, made by Milton J. Altenberg for the benefit of Team, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Guaranty, dated as of November 2, 2010, made by Jeffrey L. Ott for the benefit of Team, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2010). Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 22, 2011 among Team, Inc. as the borrower, Bank of America, NA as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and Other Lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011). Subsidiaries of the Company. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—KPMG LLP. 56 Exhibit Number 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *101.INS XBRL Instance Document. *101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document. *101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document. *101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. *101.LAB XBRL Label Linkbase Document. *101.PRE XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. † Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement. * Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability. 57 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized August 12, 2013. TEAM, INC. By: /S/ PHILIP J. HAWK Philip J. Hawk Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated. /S/ PHILIP J. HAWK (Philip J. Hawk) Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director August 12, 2013 /S/ VINCENT D. FOSTER Director August 12, 2013 (Vincent D. Foster) /S/ JACK M. JOHNSON, JR. (Jack M. Johnson, Jr.) Director August 12, 2013 /S/ EMMETT J. LESCROART Director August 12, 2013 (Emmett J. Lescroart) /S/ LOUIS A. WATERS Director August 12, 2013 (Louis A. Waters) /S/ SIDNEY B. WILLIAMS Director August 12, 2013 (Sidney B. Williams) /S/ TED W. OWEN (Ted W. Owen) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) August 12, 2013 58 Corporate Information Operating Locations* NORTH AMERICAN LOCATIONS Canada Calgary, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Fort McMurray, Alberta Grand Prairie, Alberta Red Deer, Alberta Slave Lake, Alberta Lloydminster, Alberta/ Saskatchewan Mount Pearl, Newfoundland Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Kitchener, Ontario Oakville, Ontario Sarnia, Ontario Thunder Bay, Ontario Regina, Saskatchewan Weyburn, Saskatchewan International Locations Angola Australia Belgium Colombia Jamaica Malaysia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Saudi Arabia Singapore Suriname Trinidad U.A.E. United Kingdom Venezuela *As of August 1, 2013 Registrar and Transfer Agent Communications regarding change of address, transfer of stock ownership, lost stock certificates or consolidation of multiple listings should be directed to: Registrar and Transfer Co. Attn: Investor Relations 10 Commerce Drive Cranford, New Jersey 07016 Phone: 800/368-5948 Fax: 908/497-2318 E-mail: invrelations@rtco.com Corporate Headquarters Stockholders or other interested persons wishing to be placed on the corporate mailing list should write to the corporate headquarters. Attn: Corporate Secretary André C. Bouchard 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 Investor Relations Ted W. Owen Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Team, Inc. Phone: 281/388-5525 E-mail: ir@teamindustrial services.com Independent Auditors KPMG LLP 811 Main St. Houston, TX 77002 Directors Philip J. Hawk Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Team, Inc. Vincent D. Foster Chairman and CEO Main Street Capital Corp. (NYSE: “MAIN”) Jack M. Johnson, Jr. Managing General Partner Wintermann & Company (real estate management) Emmett J. Lescroart Managing Director EJL Capital, LLC. Louis A. Waters Investor, Retired Chairman of Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. Sidney B. Williams Shareholder, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin (legal services) Corporate Officers Philip J. Hawk Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Ted W. Owen Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Arthur F. Victorson President, Inspection and Heat Treating Services Peter W. Wallace, Jr. President, Mechanical Services Jeffrey L. Ott President Quest Integrity Services André C. Bouchard Senior Vice President Administration, General Counsel and Secretary United States Daphne, Alabama Decatur, Alabama Mobile, Alabama Anchorage, Alaska Kenai, Alaska Phoenix, Arizona Benicia, California Los Angeles, California San Francisco, California Denver, Colorado Hartford, Connecticut Jacksonville, Florida Chicago, Illinois Wood River, Illinois Hammond, Indiana Baton Rouge, Louisiana Lafayette, Louisiana Lake Charles, Louisiana New Orleans, Louisiana Detroit, Michigan Minneapolis, Minnesota Kansas City, Missouri St. Louis, Missouri New York, New York Syracuse, New York Charlotte, North Carolina Wilmington, North Carolina Cincinnati, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Toledo, Ohio Tulsa, Oklahoma Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Butler, Pennsylvania San Juan, Puerto Rico Augusta, South Carolina Chattanooga, Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee Alvin, Texas Angleton, Texas Beaumont, Texas Borger, Texas Corpus Christi, Texas Houston, Texas Longview, Texas Odessa, Texas Salt Lake, Utah Richmond, Virginia Seattle, Washington Charleston, West Virginia Milwaukee, Wisconsin Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands OUR VALUES The Company’s Code of Ethical Conduct can be accessed on our Internet web site at www.teamindustrialservices.com. This Code encompasses our Core Values, which are: • Safety First in everything we do. • Integrity means doing the right thing. • Service Leadership throughout the Company. • Innovation supports continuous growth and improvement. • Pride and Respect for ourselves and our Company. Corporate Headquarters 13131 Dairy Ashford, Suite 600 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 United States Phone: 281/331-6154 I Fax: 281/331-4107 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above