A n n u a l R e p o r t
2013 Building Our Future
With a firm hold on the core values of our 115-year-old enterprise, we
performed well in 2013, even as we began the process of forging bright,
independent futures for both our steel and bearings and power transmission
businesses. Enterprise-wide, our work incorporates The Timken Company’s
very best: focused leadership, high-performance products and materials, and
services and know-how that help our customers succeed even as they face
some of their biggest challenges. We confidently look forward to a strong
2014 and beyond.
Financial Summary
(Dollars in Millions, except per share data)
Net Sales
Gross Profit
Net Income attributable to The Timken Company
Diluted Earnings per Share
Dividends per Share
Return on Sales
2013
2012
$ 4,341.2
$ 4,987.0
1,092.0
1,366.3
262.7
$ 2.74
0.92
6.1%
495.5
$ 5.07
0.92
9.9%
Net Sales
($ Billions)
$5.2
$5.0
$4.3
$4.1
$3.1
Diluted Earnings
Per Share From
Continuing
Operations
$5.07
$4.59
Dividends Per Share
$0.92
$0.92
$0.78
1
$2.73
$2.74
$0.53
$0.45
09 10 11 12 13
09 10 11
12
13
09 10 11 12
13
$(0.64)
To Our Shareholders
2
James W. Griffith, president and chief executive officer (left),
and Ward J. Timken, Jr., chairman.
he future of The Timken Company builds upon our strong
reputation, supported by our ability to deliver consistent value
and focused upon our clear vision for what lies ahead.
In every way, 2013 marked a momentous year for our company. As we detail the
year’s accomplishments and our strategic decisions, we do so with confidence in our ability
to deliver sustained results for Timken shareholders and customers around the world.
T
Performance Reflects Sustained Strength
In the years to come, when historians describe
The Timken Company’s second century of
successful operations, 2013 will be characterized
as among our most strategically significant.
Throughout the year, we
worked hard to remain
exceptional stewards of
the value we bring to our
stakeholders.
Financially, 2013
performance stands as
noteworthy considering the
lingering weak demand in our broad end markets.
Conditions continued to challenge industrial
economies and undermine our aspirations for
growth globally, yet despite weakened
demand, we performed well
while operating our plants at low
utilization levels.
In December, the Timken board of
directors declared the company’s
366th consecutive quarterly
cash dividend, demonstrating
consistency of returns that
stands as a distinguished
accomplishment among New
York Stock Exchange members.
In 2013, through dividend and stock buybacks,
we returned a total of $277 million of capital to
our shareholders.
Our financial strength also allowed us to make
discretionary contributions to our pension plans and
we closed 2013 with our pension
plans essentially fully funded.
Operationally, we
demonstrated excellence
in many areas of our
enterprise in 2013.
Operationally, we demonstrated
excellence in many areas of
our enterprise in 2013. Our
associates found new ways
to both drive efficiency and
minimize risk. A continuously
3
improving safety culture across our global operations
is a vibrant example of this effort. Over the past
10 years, we’ve posted a 96 percent reduction in
lost-time injuries and days lost.
In 2013 alone, we eliminated more
than 224 ergonomic risks and our
popular Ergo Cup competition
generated 56 entries from around
the world. Every day, we see
Timken people apply their
exceptional talents to deliver results
to all stakeholders. Our people
remain our most important asset
and we value their safety more
than anything.
Teams across Timken made us
all safer in 2013, identifying and
addressing 224 ergonomic risks.
A 3,300-ton in-line forge press is among several investments brought on line in the Steel segment in 2013.
4
We pushed ourselves in the area of productivity and
efficiency as well. We upgraded our SAP® system
with virtually no downtime, and our major global
systems – including web, email and telephone –
experienced uptime of 99.97 percent, enviable for
any manufacturer. We maintained industry-leading
customer service and delivery with improved labor
performance across our operations. Our steel
business completed successful and seamless start-ups
of four major strategic projects. We also eliminated
nearly 600,000 material “touches” in steel finishing
and pushed our melt utilization breakeven point to
industry-leading levels.
At the same time, we continued to pursue
strategic growth initiatives, expanding our existing
product lines as well as investing in new adjacent
products and services. Through acquisitions, we
expanded our product portfolio to include automated
lubrication systems with Interlube Systems Ltd.; we
extended our industrial services capabilities
to include electric motor rewind services and
uptower wind generator maintenance; and we
improved our geographic coverage with the
additions of Wazee Companies, Standard
Machine and Smith Services.
We’re proud of these achievements, which follow
record-setting financial performances in 2011
and 2012, and provide proof of our diligence in
improving our structure and earnings ability.
New Capabilities Drive Our Future
Last spring, we completed capital projects totaling
$85 million in our steel business. These include a
3,300-ton forge press at the Faircrest Steel Plant in
Canton, Ohio, automating the production of seamless
mechanical tubing with the intermediate finishing
line and extending our value-add capabilities with
a second induction thermal treatment line at the
Gambrinus Steel Plant, also in Canton. In early fall, our
second ladle refining station came online – a nearly
$25 million investment. These, along with the large
bloom continuous caster expected to be online in the
second half of 2014, will continue to improve both
our efficiency and increase the differentiation of our
high-performance Timken® steel products.
Work also continues on our North Canton
bearings headquarters. When complete in 2014,
the fully expanded and renovated campus will
house 1,200 associates across multiple disciplines.
We’ve designed it to dynamically showcase our many
products and services and serve as a global hub to
host our customers.
We maintained collaborative relationships in both
industrial and academic settings with renowned
specialists in our core disciplines of metallurgy, friction
management and mechanical power transmission. In
June, we celebrated one of these initiatives, unveiling
the Technology and Test Center built together
with Stark State College. The $14 million center,
In late 2013, associates began moving into a new 160,000-square-foot addition to the company’s technology center in North Canton, Ohio.
This $65 million investment effectively doubles the size of the campus and is slated to become headquarters for The Timken Company.
A 3,300-ton in-line forge press is among several investments brought on line in the Steel segment in 2013.
considered the first of its kind in the Americas, tests ultra-
large bearing systems and simulates harsh operating
conditions similar to those found in large multi-megawatt
wind turbines. Testing
capabilities are flexible
enough to focus beyond
wind turbine applications
to include other large
rotating equipment
used in a multitude of
industries important to
Timken. Among these
are offshore oil rigs,
mine trucks, electric
The new Technology and Test Center is the
first of its kind in the Americas.
shovels in mining, steel rolling mills, cement vertical
mills and hydraulic roll presses.
A Monumental Decision
The same type of responsible management that led
to our 2013 operational performance and our strategic
capital improvements also led to a historic moment
for the company: the decision last fall to pursue separating
our steel business from The Timken Company later
in 2014.
At our annual meeting last May, a proposal to separate
our steel business into an independent company received
53 percent of the votes cast. In response to the shareholder
vote, the board subsequently established a strategy
committee composed of independent directors. With
the help of strategic and financial advisors, the strategy
committee carefully reviewed the financial and operational
implications of separating the company’s businesses,
along with potential changes to the company’s corporate
governance and capital allocation strategy.
In September, Richard G. Kyle
was named chief operating
officer of bearings and power
transmission; he was elected
a director in December.
Mr. Kyle joined Timken in
2006 with extensive industrial
experience and has subsequently
held executive positions with the company
that include vice president of manufacturing,
president of Aerospace and Mobile Industries,
and most recently, group president, responsible
for both Steel and Aerospace. In conjunction
with the separation of the steel business and
James W. Griffith’s retirement from The Timken
Company, the board expects Mr. Kyle to succeed
Mr. Griffith as president and chief executive
officer of The Timken Company.
The board also announced that it intends to
name Ward J. “Tim” Timken, Jr., as chairman and
chief executive officer of the to-be-launched
TimkenSteel Corporation, which is expected to
trade on the NYSE under the “TMST” symbol.
John M. Timken is expected to be named
non-executive chair of The Timken Company.
Ward J. “Jack” Timken intends to retire,
in 2014, per normal course, from the
Timken board of directors after a long and
distinguished career with
the company. We thank him
for his tenured dedication,
broad knowledge and valuable
insights brought to the
board and The Timken Company
throughout his 43 years
of board service.
5
“Preparing for two strong companies tests the depth of a succession plan. One of the
reasons the board of directors feels confident in the spinoff of the steel business at
this time is the readiness of future leaders to step up in 2014. The board unanimously
supports these leaders and I am confident they will continue to build momentum to
maximize value for investors, customers and employees of both companies.”
– Joseph W. Ralston, Lead Director
Together,
we’ve explored what
separation means to
The Timken Company,
our shareholders,
customers, suppliers,
community stakeholders
and worldwide
associates.
After a thorough
review of these findings,
we announced on
September 5, 2013, that
the Timken board of
directors approved a plan
to pursue a tax-free spinoff
of the steel business from
The Timken Company,
creating a new independent publicly traded
steel company.
We commend and offer our personal thanks to
the board of directors, particularly our lead director
Joseph Ralston, who chaired the strategy committee,
and the Timken leadership team for embracing this
challenging decision with integrity, thoughtfulness
and unwavering dedication. Together, we’ve
explored what separation means to The Timken
Company, our shareholders, customers, suppliers,
community stakeholders and worldwide associates.
We remain committed to preserving many of the
benefits shared by the businesses as we establish
the new business relationship between the two
companies. With significant earnings power and
potential, we see this as the appropriate “next step”
6
to build on our core businesses and to capitalize
on the momentum created by the initiative. We
remain confident that both The Timken Company
and the soon-to-be-launched TimkenSteel
Corporation can sustain their industry-leading
performance.
Building Momentum
The events of 2013 tested our ability to re-examine,
re-think and re-imagine the future of The Timken
Company. But those deliberations were quickly
put well behind us, and we are building two strong
companies as we move forward into a new era. Both
will be laser-focused on growth in their core markets
and optimized with individual capital structures
and capital allocation strategies. We expect each
company will have improved strategic flexibility
to invest in its respective business, to pursue
acquisitions and to attract a more focused
shareholder base.
To effectively realize the potential of our future
structure, we formed the Project Management
Organization and, by the end of the third quarter,
the group was hard at work identifying hundreds of
separation activities against an aggressive timeline.
Our Profound Thanks
James W. Griffith announced in September he will retire from The Timken Company in
2014, coinciding with the separation of the steel business. He has served The Timken
Company since 1984, holding a wide range of positions – from plant manager to vice
president of manufacturing in North America and later as managing director of the
company’s business in Australia and then vice president of automotive.
In 1999, he was elected president, chief operating officer and director and was
named chief executive officer in 2002.
James W. Griffith
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Because of their efforts and quick start, we successfully
met our milestone for filing a preliminary information
statement early in the year with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and fully expect to meet our
subsequent target of a mid-year separation.
Value-Driven
We are moving forward to secure new futures for
both companies, each with very capable leaders and
exceptionally talented teams. As we complete the
process, our values remain unchanged.
We expect to continue to positively support and help
shape the communities where we work and play.
Timken associates and our charitable fund give back
to a myriad of causes through organized programs
and personal gifts of time, talent and resources.
This past year, The Timken Company Charitable and
Educational Fund, Inc. awarded scholarships to
38 children of Timken employees from 24 locations
to help them attend the universities of their choice.
Since its founding in 1958, this educational program
has awarded more than $20 million in scholarships.
This fall, we also completed another highly successful
series of United Way drives and, across our plant
communities around the world, our corporate giving
efforts supported more than 400 organizations in
addressing basic needs, education and economic
development.
At our core, we are values-driven, and we celebrate
and thank our employees worldwide for their
dedication to living by them.
To our shareholders and customers, we appreciate
your continued investment and confidence as we
prepare bright futures for both our bearings and steel
organizations. We enter 2014 with determination
and energy, entirely focused on growing and creating
shareholder value through two great companies.
FPO
“Tim” Timken presents graduating senior Austin Eckhardt
with a $50,000 renewable college scholarship funded by Timken
Charitable and Educational Fund, Inc. Looking on are parents
Kerry, global business readiness leader, and her husband, Ed.
Ward J. Timken, Jr.
Chairman
February 28, 2014
James W. Griffith
President and
Chief Executive Officer
7
Under his vision and leadership, associates of The Timken Company successfully engineered a decade-long
transformation, further positioning the company for accelerated growth and profitability. In his own words,
“we are committed to performance, offering the right products, focused on the right markets, in places around the
world that are growing the fastest.” His passion and leadership throughout the transformation led the company
to double its revenue over the course of the decade and achieve record earnings in 2011 and 2012.
Jim Griffith leaves a legacy of thoughtful, effective leadership through his enduring commitment to
The Timken Company, its shareholders, customers and employees.
- Ward J. Timken, Jr.
We engineer, manufacture and
market Timken® bearings and
related mechanical components
to support diversified markets
worldwide. Our dedicated
focus on bearings and adjacent
complex parts and systems –
which include transmissions,
gearboxes, chain and lubrication
systems – stems from our
enterprise-wide understanding of
metallurgy, friction management
and power transmission. Built
over a century of partnering with
our customers and solving end-
user problems, our knowledge
allows us to design our products
in ways that improve the
reliability and efficiency of
machinery in a broad range
of industries.
8
The Timken bearings and power transmission business
recorded notable results in 2013 in the midst of soft global
industrial markets. Mobile Industries, Process Industries and
Aerospace together posted sales of approximately $3 billion in
2013. Through the year, we continued to execute our strategic
plan, directing our focus not only to cost improvement but
also to growth in long-term attractive markets and quickly
developing geographies. We further broadened our services
footprint and introduced new products to help our customers
solve equipment performance problems, especially for
applications in harsh and demanding environments.
Expanding Our Global Reach
Continuing our geographic diversification is fundamental to
the growth of The Timken Company. Our own Timken sales
force and field service technicians – coupled with a network
of more than 1,500 strategically located distributor partners
across the globe and their 5,000 branch locations – put over
25,000 sales professionals at the ready to assist customers
with product knowledge and specifications. And, our
sales engineers work alongside the world’s premiere
equipment design teams to turn today’s concepts into
tomorrow’s newest models. For example, Timken acted
quickly when a major automotive manufacturer needed
help in launching its new 10-ton truck for the Brazilian
market. Timken specialists worked with the systems
Timken applies deep knowledge of metallurgy,
friction management and power transmission to
improve the reliability and efficiency of machinery
all around the world.
manufacturer to develop a high-value solution
and enable an on-time launch of the vehicle in
loads in the world through extreme heat and
24/7 operations.
October 2013.
We also remain focused on high-growth
geographies such as the industrial aftermarkets
in Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.
We look to the rapidly industrializing nations of
China, India, Indonesia and Malaysia, along with
many European countries, to generate additional
business opportunities. Management has
aggressively positioned the company to succeed
in these areas.
A case in point
is our new
30,000-square-foot
service center in
Raipur, India, which
provides gear drive
and bearing repair
We introduced our broad aerospace portfolio in
South America in August. Attendees at the Latin
American Business Aviation Conference and Exhibition
in Sao Paulo, Brazil, heard first-hand about Timken
products and services that can extend the total life-
cycle of aerospace equipment, including technology
development, engineering, manufacture, maintenance
and repair for aircraft and helicopter fleets.
One of the largest aircraft producers in Asia
called on Timken to develop the main transmission
and rotor bearings in its new light-utility helicopter
to be launched in 2015. Each helicopter will
feature 11 Timken® bearings between the main
and rotor transmissions. Timken team members
from India, the United States, Germany, France
and the United Kingdom collaborated to provide
the solution.
as well as upgrade services to meet growing
customer demand in central India. This facility adds to
our existing footprint of bearing production facilities
in Chennai and Jamshedpur, as well as a research
and technology center located at the Bangalore
The Timken Company operates from 28 countries
around the globe. Each customer is important to
us and we will continue to anticipate their needs to
create additional opportunities for global growth
and geographic diversification.
headquarters.
In Australia, we delivered 32,000 rail car replacement
bearings to a mining customer in the remote Pilbara
region. The bearings will carry some of the heaviest
Growing Beyond Bearings
Growth and product line extension through
acquisition added more than $250 million in revenue
since 2011. We expanded our expertise into areas
2011
2011
2012
2013
2013
2013
Acquisitions that capture strong aftermarket opportunities and leverage our distribution channel help fuel our long-term growth.
9
10
Under the guidance of Richard G. Kyle, The Timken Company
bearings and power transmission business continues to focus
on growth in long-term attractive markets and developing
geographies.
such as gear drive repair and motor rewind services
and complemented our portfolio with additions
of chain, couplings and lubrication systems. We
continue to seek businesses to join our growing
portfolio of services, leveraging our network to
provide more rapid expansion and greater value
around the world.
To illustrate, we added to our footprint in 2013 with
the completion of three acquisitions:
Interlube Systems, Ltd., Plymouth, U.K. – a manufacturer
and installer of automated lubrication delivery systems
and related components to end-market sectors
including commercial vehicles, construction, mining
and general industries;
Smith Services Inc., Princeton, West Virginia – a
provider of electric motor repair and field technical
services to end users across seven states in the region,
serving a wide variety of markets including power
generation, petrochemical, paper, steel, nuclear
and mining; and,
Standard Machine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,
Canada – a provider of new gearboxes, gearbox
service and repair, open gearing, large fabrication,
machining and field
technical services
to end users in
Canada and the
western
United States.
Developing New Products for Growth
In addition to acquisitions, we continue to pursue
vigorous product expansion. In collaboration with
our customers, we are building out our range of
industrial and aerospace bearings.
In April, we introduced a new line of Timken® SNT
plummer block housed units adding to our existing
line of split-block units. This product addresses
global demand for a metric plummer block design
and, with this introduction, Timken offers one of
the most complete lines of quality housed units in
the world.
We also announced an expansion of tapered roller
bearing sets, hub units and seals for medium-duty
vehicles, including commercial vans, delivery
trucks, bucket trucks and other fleet vehicles.
Taking Steps to Thrive in 2014
Throughout the year, and especially in the third
quarter, we implemented a number of cost-reduction
initiatives across the globe. These included two plant
rationalizations in North America and broad-based
variable cost reductions in manufacturing
and logistics.
We move into our future with a tremendous
amount of excitement. For The Timken Company,
its customers, shareholders and its employees,
2014 marks the beginning of a new era. We look
forward to it.
Our steel business stands as the
leader in special bar quality steel
and seamless mechanical tubing,
with an annual melt capacity of
approximately two million tons.
We employ a business model that is
unique in the industry and focuses
on creating tailored products and
services for our customers’ most
demanding applications. Our
engineers offer deep expertise in
both materials and applications,
and we often work closely with
customers to deliver flexible
solutions related to our products as
well as their applications and supply
chains. Few others can consistently
deliver such customization and
responsiveness.
Delivering Strong Performance
In 2013, the steel business recorded sales of $1.4 billion.*
Despite soft markets, the business drove profitability and
posted strong operating performance by delivering tailored
steel solutions. The success of a multi-year strategy to boost
operating efficiencies drove this performance, even at plant
melt utilization of 59 percent. Targeted investments further
strengthen a solid foundation, supporting greater efficiency
as well as earnings power, and we’re excited at the prospect
of leveraging market conditions as they improve.
Investing for the Future
This year, we began to realize initial benefits from our
$500 million multi-year steel capital investment program.
We designed our plan to further strengthen our ability to
provide differentiated solutions for the energy, industrial
and automotive markets and, at the same time, enhance our
operational performance and customer service capabilities.
These efforts include:
• A 3,300-ton open-die in-line forge press, which got off to a
fast start in 2013. The forge press uses an innovative process
developed by Timken to enhance center soundness of a
larger cross-section of Timken® special bar quality steel.
Combined with new ultrasonic testing equipment, the
11
*based on Steel segment sales, including intercompany sales
Our new in-line forge
press further enhances the
consistency of properties
in special bar quality
Timken® steel.
A second ladle refiner
enables production of a
broader range of large-
diameter steel bars.
12
Ward J. “Tim” Timken, Jr., started
his career in the company’s steel
business in 1992. At the time of
separation, the board intends to
name him chairman and chief
executive officer of TimkenSteel
Corporation.
new forging capabilities offer customers steel bars that can unlock new market
opportunities and greater operating efficiencies.
• Our new intermediate steel tube finishing line started up in February. The
line increases operational efficiencies by incorporating the latest technologies
and employing lean processes, significantly eliminating product handling and
material movements – essential to Timken steel quality and the continued
advancement of our organizational safety practices. The operation advances
testing accuracy, reduces processing times and incorporates an environmentally
friendly de-scaling system.
• A second induction thermal treatment line at the Gambrinus Steel Plant
introduces about 40,000 tons of normalized thermal-treat capacity annually.
Used in conjunction with current thermal-treat assets, the line helps increase
quench and temper capacity.
• An additional ladle refining station, a nearly $25 million investment in itself,
also came online in the fall of 2013. This station adds efficiencies and increases
our capability to make more complex grades of high-performance steel.
Our reputation for delivering industry-best chemical control and precision
increases with this investment.
• Lastly, we expect hot commissioning of the capstone of our investment project, a
jumbo vertical continuous caster that will provide large bar capabilities unique in
the United States, in the second half of 2014. With the caster, the first of its kind in
the Americas, we expect to produce the world’s largest steel cross-sections with
cleanness levels that equal ingot casting.
Taken together, these investments allow Timken to
increase shippable capacity, productivity and yields,
and create greater operational flexibility, offering
alternative production paths. This translates into
greater customer responsiveness, especially in times
of peak demand, as well as expands our product
offering to customers with demanding
application needs.
Driving Growth for Tomorrow
Of course it takes more than
capital investment to ensure
competitive advantage. Success
comes from Timken people –
including the metallurgists,
engineers and technicians –
who write the specifications for the equipment
and the formulas for our steel solutions.
Recently, our researchers and technology experts
introduced a new additive manufacturing process
for producing piercing mill tooling. Now, we have
the potential to improve tooling life, reduce costs
and increase piercing mill productivity without
sacrificing quality.
At the same time, we introduced new grades of
high-performance alloy steel that meet key API and
NACE standards and better serve our customers
in the rapidly expanding energy industry. We’re
also extending our reach into the growing need for
heavy wall – high pressure, high temperature oil
country tubular goods.
Our strong relationships with leading drilling and
completion tool customers, especially for offshore
high-performance applications, led to increased
orders in 2013 and ongoing strength into 2014.
Internationally, we also expanded
our applications – and our oil and gas
customer base – in the developing
regions of Russia, Africa and China. In
Europe, our forge-rolled bar products
enabled us to build a larger presence
with oil and gas customers. In Australia
and Canada, our value-added boring
specialty products helped us grow our mining
application business. In South America, a bolstered
distribution network helped us secure new
customers.
Renewing Our Promise, Maintaining Our Focus
Our commitment to being an industry leader in
the high-performance steel market has never
been stronger or more evident. Equipped with
new investments and greater operational
efficiencies realized in 2013, we are better positioned
than ever to deliver sustainable value and capitalize
on the opportunities ahead.
13
Steel serves customers worldwide,
producing custom alloy steels that
are recognized among the highest
quality, highest-performing
air-melted products in the world.
Board of Directors
Ward J. Timken, Jr.
Director since 2002
Chairman
Board of Directors
The Timken Company
James W. Griffith
Director since 1999
President and
Chief Executive Officer
The Timken Company
Joseph W. Ralston
Lead Director
Director since 2003 (C, N)
Retired General, USAF,
and Vice Chairman
The Cohen Group
14
John M. Timken, Jr.
Director since 1986
Richard G. Kyle
Director since 2013
Private Investor
Chief Operating Officer,
Bearings and Power Transmission
The Timken Company
John M. Ballbach
Director since 2009 (A, C)
Phillip R. Cox
Director since 2004 (A, N)
Former Chairman, President
President and
and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
VWR International, LLC
Cox Financial Corporation
(A) Audit Committee Member (C) Compensation Committee Member (N) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
Diane C. Creel
Director since 2012 (A, C)
Retired Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer
and President
Ecovation, Inc.
John A. Luke, Jr.
Director since 1999 (C, N)
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
MeadWestvaco Corporation
Christopher L. Mapes
Director since 2014 (A, C)
Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
15
John P. Reilly
Director since 2006 (A, C)
Frank C. Sullivan
Director since 2003 (A, N)
Former Chairman, President
Chairman and
and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
Figgie International
RPM International, Inc.
Ward J. Timken
Director since 1971
Jacqueline F. Woods
Director since 2000 (C, N)
President
Retired President
Timken Foundation
AT&T Ohio
Officers and Executives
Richard M. Boyer
Vice President – Manufacturing –
Bearings and Power Transmission
Michael J. Connors
Vice President – Distribution
Thomas D. Moline
Vice President – Steel Manufacturing
Alan C. Oberster
Vice President –
Environmental, Health and Safety
Ajay K. Das
Vice President – Quality Advancement
Erik A. Paulhardt
Vice President – Aerospace and Defense
Timothy A. Graham
Vice President – Purchasing
Carl D. Rapp
Vice President – Industrial Services
James M. Gresh
Vice President –
Strategy and International – Steel
Andreas Roellgen
Vice President – Process Industries and
Managing Director - Europe
Kari L. Groh
Vice President –
Communications and Public Relations
Brian J. Ruel
Vice President – Off-Highway,
Light Vehicle Systems and Rail
Robert N. Keeler
Vice President – Mobile and Industrial
Engineered Steel Solutions
Scott A. Scherff
Corporate Secretary and
Vice President – Ethics and Compliance
Thomas A. Kirkpatrick
Vice President – Auditing
Robert J. Lapp
Vice President – Government Affairs
and Community Relations
Shawn J. Seanor
Vice President – Energy and Distribution
Engineered Steel Solutions
Peter Sproson
President – China
Ward J. Timken, Jr.
Chairman – Board of Directors
James W. Griffith
President and Chief Executive Officer
Richard G. Kyle
Chief Operating Officer –
Bearings and Power Transmission
Philip D. Fracassa
Chief Financial Officer
Glenn A. Eisenberg
Executive Vice President –
Finance and Administration
16
Christopher A. Coughlin
Group President
William R. Burkhart
Senior Vice President and
General Counsel
Christopher J. Holding
Senior Vice President – Tax and Treasury
J. Ron Menning
Senior Vice President –
Planning and Development
J. Ted Mihaila
Senior Vice President and Controller
Daniel E. Muller
Senior Vice President and
Chief Information Officer
Douglas H. Smith
Senior Vice President and
Chief Technology Officer
Donald L. Walker
Senior Vice President –
Human Resources and
Organizational Advancement
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number: 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W., Canton, Ohio
(Address of principal executive offices)
34-0577130
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
44706
(Zip Code)
(330) 438-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, without par value
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
No
As of June 28, 2013, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $4,830,680,452 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Common Shares, without par value
Outstanding at January 31, 2014
92,781,376 shares
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on or about May 13, 2014 (Proxy Statement)
Parts Into Which Incorporated
Part III
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 1
3/10/14 6:46 PM
The Timken Company
INDEX TO FORM 10-K REPORT
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
I.
Part I.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 4A.
II. Part II.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
III. Part III.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
IV. Part IV.
Item 15.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
PAGE
1
7
14
15
15
15
16
17
19
20
49
50
91
91
93
93
93
93
93
93
94
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 2
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
Part I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL:
As used herein, the term “Timken” or the “Company” refers to The Timken Company and its subsidiaries unless the context
otherwise requires. Timken, a global industrial technology leader, engineers, manufactures and markets mechanical components,
Timken® bearings and engineered steel bars and tubes, as well as transmissions, gearboxes, chain and related products and
services, support diversified markets worldwide.
The Company was founded in 1899 by Henry Timken, who received two patents on the design of a tapered roller bearing. Timken
grew to become the world’s largest manufacturer of tapered roller bearings and leveraged its expertise to further expand its
portfolio of bearing products to include cylindrical, spherical, needle and precision ball bearings. Based on its engineering
capabilities and technical knowledge, Timken built its reputation as a global leader and applied its knowledge of metallurgy, friction
management and mechanical power transmission to increase the reliability and efficiency of its customers’ equipment, improving
productivity, uptime and performance across a wide range of applications and markets. The Company’s broad portfolio includes
power transmission components and systems, engineered surfaces and coatings, lubricants and seals, as well as aftermarket
services, including bearing and gearbox remanufacture and repair. The Company also manufactures helicopter transmissions,
high-performance engineered alloy steels bars and seamless mechanical tubing, as well as finished and semi-finished steel
components made to exact specifications to meet customers’ increasing demands for reliability and efficiency. The Company’s
global footprint consists of 64 manufacturing facilities, 12 technology and engineering centers and 11 distribution centers and
warehouses, supported by a team comprised of nearly 19,000 employees. Timken operates in 28 countries and territories around
the globe.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to Note 15 – Segment Information in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAJOR CUSTOMERS:
The Company sells products and services to a diverse customer base globally, including customers in the following market
sectors: industrial equipment, construction, agriculture, rail, aerospace and defense, automotive, heavy truck and oil and gas. The
Company does not have any sales to a single customer that are 5% or more of total sales.
PRODUCTS:
Timken manufactures and manages global supply chains for multiple product lines including anti-friction bearings, mechanical
power transmission solutions, engineered steel and related precision steel components designed to operate in demanding
environments. The Company leverages its technical knowledge, research expertise and production and engineering capabilities
across all of its products and end-markets to deliver high-performance products to its customers. Differentiation in these product
lines is achieved by either: (1) product type or (2) the targeted applications utilizing the product.
Bearings and Power Transmission Solutions. Selection and development of bearings for customer applications and demand for
high reliability require sophisticated engineering and analytical techniques. Deep knowledge of friction management combined
with high precision tolerances, proprietary internal geometries and premium quality materials, provide Timken bearings with
high load-carrying capacity, excellent friction-reducing qualities and long service lives. The uses for bearings are diverse and can
be found in transportation applications that include passenger cars and trucks, heavy trucks, helicopters, airplanes and trains.
Ranging in size from precision bearings the size of a pencil eraser to those roughly three meters in diameter, high-performance
Timken components are also used in a wide variety of industrial applications, ranging from paper and steel mills, mining, oil and
gas extraction and production, gear drives, health and positioning control, wind mills and food processing. Timken manufactures
or in some cases purchases the required components and then sells them assembled or as individual components in a wide
variety of configurations and sizes. In addition to bearings, Timken offers mechanical power transmission components, including
chains, augers, gear boxes, seals, lubricants and related products and services.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 1
1
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY BUSINESS
Tapered Roller Bearings. The tapered roller bearing is the Company’s original entrant to the anti-friction bearing sector. Tapered
rollers permit ready absorption of both radial and axial load combinations. For this reason, tapered roller bearings are particularly
well-adapted to reducing friction where shafts, gears or wheels are used. Bearings generally consist of four components: (1) the
cone or inner race; (2) the cup or outer race; (3) the rollers, which roll between the cup and cone; and (4) the cage, which serves as
a retainer and maintains proper spacing between the rollers. They can be found wherever gears and shafts turn in a wide variety
of market sectors, including construction and mining, metal and paper-making mills, commercial truck and power generation.
Precision Cylindrical and Ball Bearings. The Company’s aerospace facilities produce high-performance ball and cylindrical
bearings for ultra high-speed and/or high-accuracy applications in space and robotic vehicles, including Curiosity, the newest
Mars rover. Customers for these precision bearings also include manufacturers of medical and health equipment, machine tools,
critical motion control systems and precision robotics. These bearings utilize ball and straight rolling elements and are in the
super-precision end of the general ball and straight roller bearing product range in the bearing industry. A majority of these
bearings products are custom-designed bearings and spindle assemblies. They often utilize specialized materials and coatings in
applications that subject the bearings to extreme operating conditions of speed and temperature.
Spherical and Cylindrical Roller Bearings. Timken produces spherical and cylindrical roller bearings for large gear drives, rolling
mills and other industrial and infrastructure development applications. These products are sold worldwide to original equipment
manufacturers and industrial distributors serving major end-market sectors, including construction and mining, natural resources,
defense, pulp and paper production, rolling mills and general industrial goods. The same rigorous analysis and development
apply to these products.
Chains and Augers. Through the acquisition of Drives, LLC (Drives) in 2011, Timken manufactures precision roller chain, pintle
chain, agricultural conveyor chain, engineering class chain, oil field roller chain and auger products. These highly engineered
products are vital to a wide range of mobile and industrial machinery applications, including agriculture, oil and gas, aggregate and
mining, primary metals, forest products and other heavy industries. They also are utilized in the food and beverage and packaged
goods sectors, which often require high-end, specialty products, including stainless-steel and corrosion-resistant roller chains.
Gear-Drive Systems. Through the acquisition of the assets of Philadelphia Gear Corp. (Philadelphia Gear) in 2011, Timken provides
aftermarket gear box repair services and gear-drive systems for the industrial, energy and military marine sectors, including
refining and pipeline systems, mining, cement, pulp and paper making and water management systems.
Services. Timken offers a broad array of industrial services including bearing reconditioning and repair; condition monitoring
and reliability services designed to maximize performance; and durability and maintenance intervals for industrial and railroad
customers, both domestically and internationally. Other services include maintenance and rework of large industrial equipment
used in metal-making mills and the energy sectors. Services accounted for less than 5% of the Company’s net sales for the year
ended December 31, 2013.
Aerospace Products and Services. The Company’s portfolio of parts, systems and services for the aerospace market sector
has grown to include products used in helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft for the military and commercial aviation industries.
Timken designs, manufactures and tests a wide variety of power transmission and drive train components, including bearings,
transmissions, turbine engine components, gears and rotor-head assemblies and housings. Other parts include airfoils (such as
blades, vanes, rotors and diffusers), nozzles and other precision flight-critical components. In addition to original equipment,
Timken provides a wide range of aftermarket products and services for global customers, including complete engine overhaul,
bearing repair, component reconditioning and replacement parts for gas turbine engines, transmissions and fuel controls,
gearboxes and accessory systems in helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft.
2
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 2
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Steel. Timken manufactures alloy steel as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel. Included in its portfolio are specialty bar quality
(SBQ) bars and seamless mechanical tubing. In addition, Timken supplies machining and thermal treatment services, as well as
manages raw material recycling programs. Timken’s metallurgical expertise and unique operational capabilities drive customized,
high-value solutions for the mobile, industrial and energy sectors.
Timken focuses on creating tailored products and services for their customers’ most demanding applications and supply chains,
and most of their steel is custom-engineered. Timken leverages its technical knowledge, research expertise and production and
engineering capabilities across all of its products and end markets to deliver high-performance steel products to its customers.
Timken’s engineers are experts both in materials and applications, enabling us to deliver flexible solutions related to steel products
as well as their applications and supply chains.
Precision Steel Components. Timken also produces custom-made steel products, including steel components for automotive
and industrial customers. Steel components provide the Company with the opportunity to further expand its market for tubing
and capture higher value-added steel sales by streamlining customer supply chains. It also enables traditional Timken tubing
customers in the automotive and bearing industries to take advantage of ready-to-finish components that cost less than other
alternatives. Customization of products is an important element of the Company’s steel business where mechanical power
transmission is critical to the end customer.
SALES AND DISTRIBUTION:
Timken products are sold principally by its own internal sales organizations. A portion of each segment’s sales are made through
authorized distributors.
Customer collaboration is central to the Company’s sales strategy. Therefore, Timken goes where its customers need them, with
sales engineers primarily working in close proximity to customers rather than at production sites. In some cases, Timken may
co-locate with a customer at their facility to ensure optimized collaboration. The Company’s sales force constantly updates the
team’s training and knowledge regarding all friction management products and market sector trends, and Timken employees
assist customers during development and implementation phases and provide ongoing service and support.
The Company has a joint venture in North America focused on joint logistics and e-business services. This joint venture, CoLinx,
LLC, includes five equity members: Timken, SKF Group, the Schaeffler Group, Rockwell Automation and Gates Corporation. The
e-business service focuses on information and business services for authorized distributors in the Process Industries segment.
Most orders for Timken’s steel products are customized to satisfy customer-specific applications and are shipped directly to
customers from the Company’s steel manufacturing plants. Less than 10% of the Timken Steel segment’s net sales are intersegment
sales. In addition, sales are made to other anti-friction bearing companies and to the automotive and truck, forging, construction,
industrial equipment, oil and gas drilling, aircraft industries and to steel service centers.
Timken has entered into individually negotiated contracts with some of its customers. These contracts may extend for one or
more years and, if a price is fixed for any period extending beyond current shipments, customarily include a commitment by
the customer to purchase a designated percentage of its requirements from Timken. Timken does not believe that there is any
significant loss of earnings risk associated with any given contract.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 3
3
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY BUSINESS
COMPETITION:
The anti-friction bearing business is highly competitive in every country where Timken sells products. Timken competes primarily
based on total value, including price, quality, timeliness of delivery, product design and the ability to provide engineering
support and service on a global basis. The Company competes with domestic manufacturers and many foreign manufacturers of
anti-friction bearings, including SKF Group, the Schaeffler Group, NTN Corporation, JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT) and NSK Ltd.
The steel industry, both domestically and globally, is highly competitive and is expected to remain so. Maintaining high
standards of product quality and reliability, while keeping production costs competitive, is essential to the Company’s ability to
compete with domestic and foreign manufacturers of mechanical components and alloy steel. Principal bar competitors include
foreign-owned domestic producers Gerdau Special Steel North America (a unit of Brazilian steelmaker Gerdau, S.A) and Republic
Steel (a unit of Mexican steel producer ICH), along with domestic steel producers Steel Dynamics, Inc. and Nucor Corporation.
Seamless tubing competitors include foreign-owned domestic producers ArcelorMittal Tubular Products (a unit of Luxembourg-
based ArcelorMittal, S.A.), V&M Star Tubes (a unit of Vallourec, S.A.), and Tenaris, S.A. Additionally, Timken competes with a wide
variety of offshore producers of both bars and tubes, including Sanyo Special Steel and Ovako Group AB. Timken also provides
value-added steel products to its customers in the energy, industrial and automotive sectors. Competitors within the value-added
market segment include Linamar, Jernberg and Curtis Screw Company.
JOINT VENTURES:
Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method were approximately $1.6 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The amount at December 31, 2013 was reported in other non-current assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
BACKLOG:
The following table provides the backlog of orders of the Company’s domestic and overseas operations at December 31, 2013
and 2012:
(Dollars in millions)
Segment:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Total Company
December 31,
2013
2012
$ 562.7
370.8
382.4
285.7
$ 1,601.6
$ 708.5
387.8
404.7
311.6
$ 1,812.6
Approximately 90% of the Company’s backlog at December 31, 2013 is scheduled for delivery in the succeeding twelve months.
Actual shipments depend upon customers’ ever-changing production schedules. Accordingly, Timken does not believe that its
backlog data and comparisons thereof, as of different dates, reliably indicate future sales or shipments.
4
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 4
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
RAW MATERIALS:
The principal raw materials used by Timken in steel manufacturing are scrap metal, nickel, molybdenum and other alloys. The
availability and costs of raw materials and energy resources are subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things,
new laws or regulations, changes in global demand levels, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, interruptions in production
by suppliers, changes in exchange rates and prevailing price levels. For example, the consumption cost of scrap metal increased
23.4% from 2010 to 2011, decreased 6.1% from 2011 to 2012 and decreased 10.2% from 2012 to 2013.
The Company continues to expect that it will be able to pass a significant portion of cost increases through to customers in the
form of price increases or surcharges.
Disruptions in the supply of raw materials or energy resources could temporarily impair the Company’s ability to manufacture its
products for its customers or require the Company to pay higher prices in order to obtain these raw materials or energy resources
from other sources, which could affect the Company’s revenues and profitability. Any increase in the costs for such raw materials or
energy resources could materially affect the Company’s earnings. Timken believes that the availability of raw materials and alloys
is adequate for its needs, and, in general, it is not dependent on any single source of supply.
RESEARCH:
Timken operates a network of technology and engineering centers to support its global customers with sites in North America,
Europe and Asia. This network develops and delivers innovative friction management and mechanical power transmission solutions
and technical services. The largest technical center is located in North Canton, Ohio, near Timken’s world headquarters. Other sites
in the United States include Mesa, Arizona; Manchester, Connecticut; Fulton, Illinois; Keene and Lebanon, New Hampshire and
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Within Europe, the Company has technology facilities in Plymouth, England; Colmar, France and
Ploiesti, Romania. In Asia, Timken operates technology and engineering facilities in Bangalore, India and Shanghai, China.
Expenditures for research, development and application amounted to approximately $46.1 million, $52.6 million and $49.6 million
in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of these amounts, approximately $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million were funded by
others in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS:
The Company continues its efforts to protect the environment and comply with environmental protection laws. Additionally,
it has invested in pollution control equipment and updated plant operational practices. The Company is committed to
implementing a documented environmental management system worldwide and to becoming certified under the ISO 14001
standard where appropriate to meet or exceed customer requirements. As of the end of 2013, 21 of the Company’s plants had
obtained ISO 14001 certification.
The Company believes it has established appropriate reserves to cover its environmental expenses and has a well-established
environmental compliance audit program for its domestic and international units. This program measures performance against
applicable laws, as well as against internal standards that have been established for all units worldwide. It is difficult to assess
the possible effect of compliance with future requirements that differ from existing ones. As previously reported, the Company
is unsure of the future financial impact to the Company that could result from the United States Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA’s) final rules to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate and ozone. In addition, the
Company is unsure of the future financial impact to the Company that could result from the EPA instituting hourly ambient air
quality standards for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide. The Company is also unsure of the potential future financial impact to the
Company that could result from possible future legislation regulating emissions of greenhouse gases.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 5
5
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY BUSINESS
The Company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries have been identified as potentially responsible parties for investigation and
remediation at off-site disposal or recycling facilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA), known as the Superfund, or state laws similar to CERCLA. In general, such claims for investigation
and remediation have also been asserted against numerous other entities, which are believed to be financially solvent and are
expected to substantially fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation.
Management believes any ultimate liability with respect to pending actions will not materially affect the Company’s operations,
cash flows or consolidated financial position. The Company is also conducting environmental investigation and/or remediation
activities at a number of current or former operating sites. The costs of such investigation and remediation activities, in the
aggregate, are not expected to be material to the operations or financial position of the Company.
New laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination
or the imposition of new clean-up requirements may require Timken to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased
liabilities that could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES:
Timken owns numerous U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks and licenses relating to certain products. While Timken regards these
as important, it does not deem its business as a whole, or any industry segment, to be materially dependent upon any one item
or group of items.
EMPLOYMENT:
At December 31, 2013, Timken had nearly 19,000 employees. Approximately 9% of Timken’s U.S. employees are covered under
collective bargaining agreements.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION:
The Company uses its Investor Relations website at www.timken.com/investors, as a channel for routine distribution of important
information, including news releases, analyst presentations and financial information. The Company posts filings as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC),
including its annual, quarterly and current reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K; its proxy statements; and any amendments to
those reports or statements. All such postings and filings are available on the Company’s website free of charge. In addition, this
website allows investors and other interested persons to sign up to automatically receive e-mail alerts when the Company posts
news releases and financial information on the Company’s website. The SEC also maintains a web site, www.sec.gov, which contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The content
on any website referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report unless
expressly noted.
6
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 6
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risks that are
highlighted below are not the only ones that we face. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-
looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results and financial
condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our
business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.
RISK RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS:
The bearing industry is highly competitive, and this competition results in significant pricing pressure for our
products that could affect our revenues and profitability.
The global bearing industry is highly competitive. We compete with domestic manufacturers and many foreign manufacturers
of anti-friction bearings, including SKF Group, the Schaeffler Group, NTN Corporation, JTEKT and NSK Ltd. The bearing industry
is also capital intensive and profitability is dependent on factors such as labor compensation and productivity and inventory
management, which are subject to risks that we may not be able to control. Due to the competitiveness within the bearing
industry, we may not be able to increase prices for our products to cover increases in our costs. In many cases we face pressure
from our customers to reduce prices, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. In addition, our customers may
choose to purchase products from one of our competitors rather than pay the prices we seek for our products, which could
adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Competition and consolidation in the steel industry, together with potential global overcapacity, could result in
significant pricing pressure for our products.
Competition within the steel industry, both domestically and worldwide, is intense and is expected to remain so. Global production
overcapacity has occurred in the recent past and may recur in the future, which would exert downward pressure on domestic steel
prices and result in, at times, a dramatic narrowing, or with many companies the elimination, of gross margins. High levels of steel
imports into the United States could exacerbate this pressure on domestic steel prices. In addition, many of our competitors are
continuously exploring and implementing strategies, including acquisitions and the addition or repositioning of capacity, which
focus on manufacturing higher margin products that compete more directly with our steel products. Depending upon prevailing
market conditions in the United States and abroad, the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, and other similar
variables beyond our control, import activity into the United States and/or domestic production could continue to increase. These
factors could lead to significant downward pressure on prices for our steel products or a reduction in sales, which could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Our business is capital intensive, and if there are downturns in the industries that we serve, we may be forced to
significantly curtail or suspend operations with respect to those industries, which could result in our recording asset
impairment charges or taking other measures that may adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.
Our business operations are capital intensive, and we devote a significant amount of capital to certain industries. If there are
downturns in the industries that we serve, we may be forced to significantly curtail or suspend our operations with respect to
those industries, including laying-off employees, recording asset impairment charges and other measures, which may adversely
affect our results of operations and profitability.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 7
7
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
Weakness in global economic conditions or in any of the industries or geographic regions in which we or our
customers operate, as well as the cyclical nature of our customers’ businesses generally or sustained uncertainty
in financial markets, could adversely impact our revenues and profitability by reducing demand and margins.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global economy generally and in global capital
markets. There has been extreme volatility in the capital markets and in the end markets and geographic regions in which we and
our customers operate, which has negatively affected our revenues. Our revenues may also be negatively affected by changes in
customer demand, additional changes in the product mix and negative pricing pressure in the industries in which we operate.
Margins in those industries are highly sensitive to demand cycles, and our customers in those industries historically have tended
to delay large capital projects, including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. As a result, our
revenues and earnings are impacted by overall levels of industrial production.
Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global financial markets or in any
of the geographic regions in which we operate. If an end user cannot obtain financing to purchase our products,
either directly or indirectly contained in machinery or equipment, demand for our products will be reduced, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.
If a customer becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would be
adversely affected and any payment we received during the preference period prior to a bankruptcy filing may be potentially
recoverable by the bankruptcy estate. Furthermore, if certain of our customers liquidate in bankruptcy, we may incur impairment
charges relating to obsolete inventory and machinery and equipment. In addition, financial instability of certain companies in
the supply chain could disrupt production in any particular industry. A disruption of production in any of the industries where we
participate could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.
Any change in the operation of our raw material surcharge mechanisms, a raw material market index or the
availability or cost of raw materials and energy resources could materially affect our revenues and earnings.
We require substantial amounts of raw materials, including scrap metal and alloys and natural gas to operate our business. Many
of our customer contracts contain surcharge pricing provisions. The surcharges are generally tied to a widely-available market
index for that specific raw material. Recently many of the widely-available raw material market indices have experienced wide
fluctuations. Any change in a raw material market index could materially affect our revenues. Any change in the relationship
between the market indices and our underlying costs could materially affect our earnings. Any change in our projected year-end
input costs could materially affect our last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory valuation method and earnings.
Moreover, future disruptions in the supply of our raw materials or energy resources could impair our ability to manufacture our
products for our customers or require us to pay higher prices in order to obtain these raw materials or energy resources from other
sources, and could thereby affect our sales and profitability. Any increase in the prices for such raw materials or energy resources
could materially affect our costs and therefore our earnings.
Warranty, recall, quality or product liability claims could materially adversely affect our earnings.
In our business, we are exposed to warranty and product liability claims. In addition, we may be required to participate in the recall
of a product. If we fail to meet customer specifications for their products, we may be subject to product quality costs and claims.
A successful warranty or product liability claim against us, or a requirement that we participate in a product recall, could have a
material adverse effect on our earnings.
8
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 8
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report We may incur further impairment and restructuring charges that could materially affect our profitability.
We have taken $246.1 million in impairment and restructuring charges during the last five years. Changes in business or economic
conditions, or our business strategy, may result in additional restructuring programs and may require us to take additional charges
in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.
Environmental laws and regulations impose substantial costs and limitations on our operations and
environmental compliance may be more costly than we expect.
We are subject to the risk of substantial environmental liability and limitations on our operations due to environmental laws and
regulations. We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations
concerning matters such as air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste handling and disposal and the
investigation and remediation of contamination. The risks of substantial costs and liabilities related to compliance with these
laws and regulations are an inherent part of our business, and future conditions may develop, arise or be discovered that create
substantial environmental compliance or remediation liabilities and costs.
Compliance with environmental, health and safety legislation and regulatory requirements may prove to be more limiting and
costly than we anticipate. To date, we have committed significant expenditures in our efforts to achieve and maintain compliance
with these requirements at our facilities, and we expect that we will continue to make significant expenditures related to such
compliance in the future. From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings brought by private parties or governmental
authorities with respect to environmental matters, including matters involving alleged noncompliance with or liability under
environmental, health and safety laws, property damage or personal injury. New laws and regulations, including those which
may relate to emissions of greenhouse gases, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously
unknown contamination or the imposition of new clean-up requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis for
new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Unexpected equipment failures or other disruptions of our operations may increase our costs and reduce our sales
and earnings due to production curtailments or shutdowns.
Interruptions in production capabilities, especially in our Steel segment, would likely increase our production costs and reduce
sales and earnings for the affected period. In addition to equipment failures, our facilities and information technology systems are
also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions. Our
manufacturing processes are dependent upon critical pieces of equipment for which there may be only limited or no production
alternatives, such as furnaces, continuous casters and rolling equipment, as well as electrical equipment, such as transformers, and
this equipment may, on occasion, be out of service as a result of unanticipated failures. In the future, we may experience material
plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of these types of equipment failures, which could cause us to lose
or prevent us from taking advantage of various business opportunities or prevent us from responding to competitive pressures.
The Company may be subject to risks relating to its information technology systems.
The Company relies on information technology systems to process, transmit and store electronic information and manage
and operate its business. A breach in security could expose the Company and its customers and suppliers to risks of misuse of
confidential information, manipulation and destruction of data, production downtimes and operations disruptions, which in turn
could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, competitive position, business or results of operations.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 9
9
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
The global nature of our business exposes us to foreign currency fluctuations that may affect our asset values,
results of operations and competitiveness.
We are exposed to the risks of currency exchange rate fluctuations because a significant portion of our net sales, costs, assets and
liabilities, are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These risks include a reduction in our asset values, net sales,
operating income and competitiveness.
For those countries outside the United States where we have significant sales, devaluation in the local currency would reduce
the value of our local inventory as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, a stronger U.S. dollar would
result in reduced revenue, operating profit and shareholders’ equity due to the impact of foreign exchange translation on our
Consolidated Financial Statements. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may make our products more expensive for
others to purchase or increase our operating costs, affecting our competitiveness and our profitability.
Changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies and volatile economic, political and market conditions in
emerging market countries have in the past adversely affected our financial performance and may in the future adversely affect
the value of our assets located outside the United States, our gross profit and our results of operations.
Global political instability and other risks of international operations may adversely affect our operating costs,
revenues and the price of our products.
Our international operations expose us to risks not present in a purely domestic business, including primarily:
• changes in tariff regulations, which may make our products more costly to export or import;
• difficulties establishing and maintaining relationships with local original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), distributors
and dealers;
•
import and export licensing requirements;
• compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including unexpected changes in taxation and environmental or
other regulatory requirements, which could increase our operating and other expenses and limit our operations;
• disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to U.S. laws and regulations, including
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
• difficulty in staffing and managing geographically diverse operations; and
• tax exposures related to cross-border intercompany transfer pricing and other tax risks unique to international operations.
These and other risks may also increase the relative price of our products compared to those manufactured in other countries,
reducing the demand for our products in the markets in which we operate, which could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and earnings.
The funded status of our defined benefit and other postretirement plans has caused and may in the future cause
a significant reduction in our shareholders’ equity.
We recorded an increase in shareholders’ equity related to pension and postretirement benefit liabilities in 2013 primarily due to
an increase in discount rates, as well as higher than expected returns on pension and postretirement assets. However, we recorded
a decrease in shareholders’ equity related to pension and postretirement benefit liabilities in 2012, and in the future, we may be
required to record charges related to pension and other postretirement liabilities as a result of asset returns, discount rate changes
or other actuarial adjustments. These charges may be significant and would cause a reduction in our shareholders’ equity.
10
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 10
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report The funded status of our pension plans may require additional contributions, which may divert funds
from other uses.
The funded status of our pension plans may require us to make additional contributions to such plans. We made cash contributions
of approximately $121 million, $326 million and $291 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, to our defined benefit pension
plans and currently expect to make cash contributions of approximately $20 million in 2014 to such plans. However, we cannot
predict whether changing economic conditions, the future performance of assets in the plans or other factors will lead us or
require us to make contributions in excess of our current expectations, diverting funds we would otherwise apply to other uses.
Our defined benefit plans’ assets and liabilities are substantial and expenses and contributions related to those
plans are affected by factors outside our control, including the performance of plan assets, interest rates, actuarial
data and experience, and changes in laws and regulations.
Our defined benefit pension plans had assets with an estimated value of approximately $3.3 billion and liabilities with an estimated
value of approximately $3.1 billion, both as of December 31, 2013. Our future expense and funding obligations for the defined
benefit pension plans depend upon a number of factors, including the level of benefits provided for by the plans, the future
performance of assets set aside in trusts for these plans, the level of interest rates used to determine the discount rate to calculate
the amount of liabilities, actuarial data and experience and any changes in government laws and regulations. In addition, if the
various investments held by our pension trusts do not perform as expected or the liabilities increase as a result of discount rates
and other actuarial changes, our pension expense and required contributions would increase and, as a result, could materially
adversely affect our business. Due to the value of our defined benefit plan assets and liabilities, even a minor decrease in interest
rates, to the extent not offset by contributions or asset returns, could increase our obligations under such plans. We may be legally
required to make contributions to the pension plans in the future in excess of our current expectations, and those contributions
could be material.
Work stoppages or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt our operations, reduce our revenues and materially
affect our earnings.
A work stoppage at one or more of our facilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Also, if one or more of our customers were to experience a work stoppage, that customer would likely halt
or limit purchases of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We are subject to a wide variety of domestic and foreign laws and regulations that could adversely affect our
results of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
We are subject to a wide variety of domestic and foreign laws and regulations, and legal compliance risks, including securities laws,
tax laws, employment and pension-related laws, competition laws, U.S. and foreign export and trading laws, and laws governing
improper business practices. We are affected by new laws and regulations, and changes to existing laws and regulations, including
interpretations by courts and regulators.
Compliance with the laws and regulations described above or with other applicable foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations currently in effect or that may be adopted in the future could materially adversely affect our competitive position,
operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 11
11
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel our business could be materially adversely affected.
Our business substantially depends on the continued service of key members of our management. The loss of the services of
a significant number of members of our management could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future success
will also depend on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, such as engineering, finance, marketing and senior
management professionals. Competition for these employees is intense, and we could experience difficulty from time to time in
hiring and retaining the personnel necessary to support our business. If we do not succeed in retaining our current employees and
attracting new high quality employees, our business could be materially adversely affected.
We may not realize the improved operating results that we anticipate from past and future acquisitions and we
may experience difficulties in integrating acquired businesses.
We seek to grow, in part, through strategic acquisitions and joint ventures, which are intended to complement or expand our
businesses, and expect to continue to do so in the future. These acquisitions involve challenges and risks. In the event that we do
not successfully integrate these acquisitions into our existing operations so as to realize the expected return on our investment,
our results of operations, cash flow or financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our operating results depend in part on continued successful research, development and marketing of new and/or
improved products and services, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to successfully introduce new
products and services.
The success of new and improved products and services depends on their initial and continued acceptance by our customers.
Our businesses are affected, to varying degrees, by technological change and corresponding shifts in customer demand, which
could result in unpredictable product transitions or shortened life cycles. We may experience difficulties or delays in the research,
development, production, or marketing of new products and services which may prevent us from recouping or realizing a return
on the investments required to bring new products and services to market. The end result could be a negative impact on our
operating results.
12
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 12
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report RISKS RELATING TO OUR PROPOSED SPINOFF OF OUR STEEL BUSINESS:
The proposed spinoff of our steel business is contingent upon the satisfaction of a number of conditions, may
require significant time and attention of our management and may have an adverse effect on us even if not
completed.
On September 5, 2013, our board of directors approved a plan to pursue a separation of our steel business through a spinoff.
The proposed spinoff is subject to various conditions and may be affected by unanticipated developments or changes in market
conditions. Completion of the spinoff will be contingent upon customary closing conditions, including, among other things,
authorization and approval of our board of directors, receipt of governmental and regulatory approvals of the transactions
contemplated by the spinoff, receipt of a legal opinion regarding the tax-free status of the spinoff, execution of intercompany
agreements and the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form 10 with the SEC. For these and other reasons, the spinoff
may not be completed as expected during 2014, if at all.
Even if the spinoff is not completed, our ongoing businesses may be adversely affected and we may be subject to certain risks and
consequences, including, among others, the following:
• execution of the proposed spinoff will require significant time and attention from management, which may distract
management from the operation of our businesses and the execution of other initiatives that may have been beneficial to us;
• our employees may be distracted due to uncertainty about their future roles with each of the separate companies pending
the completion of the spinoff;
• we will be required to pay certain costs and expenses relating to the spinoff, such as legal, accounting and other professional
fees, whether or not it is completed; and
• we may experience negative reactions from the financial markets if we fail to complete the spinoff.
Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the price
of our common shares.
We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from the spinoff.
Although we believe that separating our steel business from our bearings and power transmission business by means of the
spinoff will provide financial, operational, managerial and other benefits to us and our shareholders, the spinoff may not provide
such results on the scope or scale we anticipate, and we may not realize the assumed benefits of the spinoff. In addition, we will
incur one-time costs in connection with the spinoff that may exceed our estimates or could negate some of the benefits we expect
to realize as a result of the spinoff. If we do not realize the assumed benefits of the spinoff or if our costs exceed our estimates, then
we could suffer a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
If the proposed spinoff of our steel business is completed, the trading price of our common shares will decline.
We expect the trading price of our common shares immediately following the spinoff to be significantly lower than immediately
prior to the spinoff because the trading price for our common shares will no longer reflect the value of our steel business.
Following the spinoff, the value of your common shares in: (a) the Company and (b) the steel business may
collectively trade at an aggregate price less than what the Company’s common shares might trade at had the
spinoff not occurred.
The common shares of: (a) the Company and (b) the steel business that you may hold following the spinoff may collectively trade
at a value less than the price at which the Company’s common shares might have traded at had the spinoff not occurred. These
reasons include the future performance of either the Company or the steel business as separate, independent companies, and
the future shareholder base and market for the Company’s common shares and the shares of the steel business and the prices at
which these shares individually trade.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 13
13
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
The spinoff could result in substantial tax liability.
The spinoff is conditioned on our receipt of an opinion of Covington & Burling LLP, special tax counsel to us (or other nationally
recognized tax counsel), in form and substance satisfactory to us, that the distribution of shares of our steel business in the spinoff
will qualify as tax-free to the steel business, us and our shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 355 and
368(a)(1)(D) and related provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and that certain internal
restructuring transactions in connection with the spinoff similarly will be tax-free to the steel business, us and other members of
our consolidated tax reporting group. The opinion will rely on, among other things, various assumptions and representations as
to factual matters made by us and the steel business which, if inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, could jeopardize
the conclusions reached by such counsel in its opinion. The opinion will not be binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS), or the courts, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or the courts will not challenge the qualification of the spinoff as a
transaction under Sections 355 and 368(a) of the Code or that any such challenge would not prevail.
If, notwithstanding receipt of the opinion of counsel, the spinoff were determined not to qualify under Section 355 of the Code,
each U.S. holder of our common shares who receives shares of the steel business in connection with the spinoff would generally
be treated as receiving a taxable distribution of property in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of the steel
business that are received. That distribution would be taxable to each such shareholder as a dividend to the extent of our current
and accumulated earnings and profits. For each such shareholder, any amount that exceeded our earnings and profits would be
treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such shareholder’s tax basis in his or her common shares of the
Company with any remaining amount being taxed as a capital gain. We would be subject to tax as if we had sold common shares
in a taxable sale for their fair market value and we would recognize taxable gain in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market
value of such common shares over our tax basis in such common shares, which could have a material adverse impact on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Certain members of our board of directors and management may have actual or potential conflicts
of interest because of their ownership of shares of the steel business or their relationships with the steel
business following the spinoff.
Certain members of our board of directors and management are expected to own shares of the steel business and/or options to
purchase shares of the steel business, which could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when our directors
and executive officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and the steel business. It is possible
that some of our directors might also be directors of the steel business following the spinoff. This may create, or appear to create,
potential conflicts of interest if these directors are faced with decisions that could have different implications for the steel business
then the decisions have for us.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 14
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Timken has manufacturing facilities at multiple locations in the United States and in a number of countries outside the United
States. The aggregate floor area of these facilities worldwide is approximately 14,383,000 square feet, all of which, except for
approximately 1,936,000 square feet, is owned in fee. The facilities not owned in fee are leased. The buildings occupied by Timken
are principally made of brick, steel, reinforced concrete and concrete block construction. All buildings are in satisfactory operating
condition to conduct business.
Timken’s Mobile Industries and Process Industries segments’ manufacturing facilities in the United States are located in Bucyrus,
Canton and Niles, Ohio; Hueytown, Alabama; Sante Fe Springs, California; Broomfield and Denver, Colorado; New Castle, Delaware;
Ball Ground, Georgia; Carlyle, Fulton and Mokena, Illinois; South Bend, Indiana; Lenexa, Kansas; Randleman and Iron Station,
North Carolina; Gaffney, Union and Honea Path, South Carolina; Pulaski and Knoxville, Tennessee; Ogden, Utah; Altavista, Virginia;
Ferndale and Pasco, Washington; Princeton, West Virginia; and Casper, Wyoming. These facilities, including warehouses at plant
locations and a technology center in North Canton, Ohio that primarily serves the Mobile Industries and Process Industries
business segments, have an aggregate floor area of approximately 5,579,000 square feet.
Timken’s Mobile Industries and Process Industries segments’ manufacturing plants outside the United States are located in Benoni,
South Africa; Villa Carcina, Italy; Colmar, France; Cheltenham, Northampton, and Plymouth, England; Ploiesti, Romania; Belo
Horizonte, Sao Paulo and Sorocaba, Brazil; Durg, Jamshedpur and Chennai, India; Sosnowiec, Poland; Saskatoon, Prince George
and St. Thomas, Canada; and Wuxi, Xiangtan and Yantai, China. These facilities, including warehouses at plant locations, have an
aggregate floor area of approximately 4,037,000 square feet.
Timken’s Aerospace segment’s manufacturing facilities in the United States are located in Mesa, Arizona; Los Alamitos, California;
Manchester, Connecticut; Keene and Lebanon, New Hampshire; New Philadelphia, Ohio; and Rutherfordton, North Carolina. These
facilities, including warehouses at plant locations, have an aggregate floor area of approximately 1,017,000 square feet.
Timken’s Aerospace segment’s manufacturing facilities outside the United States are located in Wolverhampton, England;
and Chengdu, China. These facilities, including warehouses at plant locations, have an aggregate floor area of approximately
290,000 square feet.
Timken’s Steel segment’s manufacturing facilities in the United States are located in Canton and Eaton, Ohio; Columbus, North
Carolina; and Houston, Texas. These facilities have an aggregate floor area of approximately 3,460,000 square feet. The Steel
segment also has a ferrous scrap and recycling operation in Akron, Ohio.
In addition to the manufacturing and distribution facilities discussed above, Timken owns or leases warehouses and steel
distribution facilities in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Mexico, Singapore, Argentina, Australia, Brazil
and China.
The plant utilization for the Mobile Industries segment was between approximately 50% and 60% in 2013. The plant utilization for
the Process Industries segment was between approximately 50% and 60% in 2013. The plant utilization for the Aerospace segment
was between approximately 50% and 60% in 2013. Finally, the Steel segment plant utilization was between approximately
50% and 60% in 2013. Plant utilization for all of the segments was lower in 2013 than in 2012.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 15
15
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors normally for a term of one year and until the election of their successors.
All executive officers have been employed by Timken or by a subsidiary of the Company during the past five-year period. The
executive officers of the Company as of February 28, 2014 (except as otherwise noted below) are as follows:
Name
Age
Current Position and Previous Positions During Last Five Years
Ward J. Timken, Jr.
James W. Griffith
William R. Burkhart
Christopher A. Coughlin
Glenn A. Eisenberg
Philip D. Fracassa
Richard G. Kyle
J. Ted Mihaila
Donald L. Walker
(1) Effective March 1, 2014
46
60
48
53
52
45
48
59
57
2005 Chairman of the Board
2002 President and Chief Executive Officer; Director
2000 Senior Vice President and General Counsel
2012
2011
2010
2009
Group President
President – Process Industries
President – Process Industries & Supply Chain
President – Process Industries
2002 Executive Vice President – Finance and Administration
2014
2012
2010
2009
2013
2012
2011
2009
Chief Financial Officer (1)
Senior Vice President – Planning and Development
Senior Vice President and Controller – BP&T
Senior Vice President – Tax and Treasury
Chief Operating Officer – B&PT; Director
Group President
President – Mobile Industries & Aerospace
President – Mobile Industries
2006 Senior Vice President and Controller
2004 Senior Vice President – Human Resources and Organizational
Advancement
16
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 16
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Part II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TKR.” The estimated number
of record holders of the Company’s common shares at December 31, 2013 was 4,850. The estimated number of beneficial
shareholders at December 31, 2013 was 52,218.
The following table provides information about the high and low sales prices for the Company’s common shares and dividends
paid for each quarter for the last two fiscal years.
2013
2012
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
Stock prices
High
Low
Dividends
per share
$ 58.50
$ 59.44
$ 64.35
$ 61.57
$ 47.67
$ 50.22
$ 55.00
$ 50.22
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
Stock prices
Dividends
per share
Low
$ 38.92
$ 41.81
$ 32.59
$ 36.15
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
High
$ 54.87
$ 57.94
$ 46.49
$ 48.12
ISSUER PURCHASES OF COMMON SHARES:
The following table provides information about purchases of its common shares by the Company during the quarter ended
December 31, 2013.
Period
10/1/2013 – 10/31/2013
11/1/2013 – 11/30/2013
12/1/2013 – 12/31/2013
Total
Total number
of shares
purchased (1)
9,323
1,191,987
358,345
1,559,655
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
Average
price paid
per share (2)
Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans
or programs (3)
$ 52.69
53.12
52.15
$ 52.90
—
1,190,000
357,000
1,547,000
5,627,807
4,437,807
4,080,807
4,080,807
(1) Of the shares purchased in October, November and December, 9,323, 1,987 and 1,345, respectively, represent common shares
of the Company that were owned and tendered by employees to exercise stock options, and to satisfy withholding obligations
in connection with the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted shares.
(2) For shares tendered in connection with the vesting of restricted shares, the average price paid per share is an average calculated
using the daily high and low of the Company’s common shares as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time of
vesting. For shares tendered in connection with the exercise of stock options, the price paid is the real-time trading share price
at the time the options are exercised.
(3) On February 10, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new share purchase plan pursuant to which the
Company may purchase up to ten million of its common shares in the aggregate. This new share purchase plan replaced
the Company’s 2006 common share purchase plan and this authorization expires on December 31, 2015. The Company may
purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all
or part of the purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 17
17
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among The Timken Company, S&P 500 and S&P 400 Industries
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Timken
S&P 500
S&P 400
*Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal years ending December 31.
Assumes $100 invested on January 1, 2009, in Timken common shares, the S&P 500 Index, and the S&P 400 Industrials.
Timken
S&P 500
S&P 400 Industrials
2009
$ 124
126
132
2010
$ 254
145
172
2012
$ 210
149
170
2011
$ 264
172
207
2013
$ 309
228
299
The line graph compares the cumulative total shareholder returns over five years for The Timken Company, the S&P 500 Stock
Index and the S&P 400 Industrials Index.
18
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 18
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Summar y of Operations and Other Comparative Data
(Dollars in millions, except per share and per employee data)
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Statements of Income
Net sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Impairment and restructuring charges
Operating income (loss)
Other income (expense), net
Interest expense, net
Income (loss) from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes
Net income (loss) attributable to The Timken Company
Balance Sheets
Inventories, net
Property, plant and equipment, net
Total assets
Total debt:
Short-term debt
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt
Total debt
Net debt (cash)
Total debt
Less: cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
Net debt (cash): (1)
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
Capital:
Net debt (cash)
Shareholders’ equity
$4,341.2
1,092.0
626.6
16.4
436.0
3.6
22.5
263.0
—
$ 262.7
$ 809.9
1,558.1
4,477.9
18.6
250.7
206.6
$4,987.0
1,366.3
643.9
29.5
692.9
101.3
28.2
495.9
$5,170.2
1,369.7
626.2
14.4
729.1
(1.1 )
31.2
456.6
$4,055.5
1,021.7
563.8
21.7
436.2
3.8
34.5
269.5
$3,141.6
582.7
472.7
164.1
(54.1 )
(0.1 )
40.0
(66.0 )
—
$ 495.5
—
$ 454.3
7.4
$ 274.8
(72.6 )
$ (134.0 )
$ 862.1
1,405.3
4,244.2
$ 964.4
1,308.9
4,327.4
$ 828.5
1,267.7
4,180.4
$ 671.2
1,335.2
4,006.9
14.3
9.6
455.1
22.0
14.3
478.8
22.4
9.6
481.7
26.3
17.1
469.3
$ 475.9
$ 479.0
$ 515.1
$ 513.7
$ 512.7
475.9
(399.7 )
$ 76.2
1,829.3
$2,648.6
76.2
2,648.6
479.0
(601.5 )
$ (122.5 )
1,997.6
$2,246.6
515.1
(468.4 )
$ 46.7
2,284.9
$2,042.5
513.7
(877.1 )
$ (363.4 )
2,238.6
$1,941.8
512.7
(755.5 )
$ (242.8 )
2,411.3
$1,595.6
(122.5 )
2,246.6
46.7
2,042.5
(363.4 )
1,941.8
(242.8 )
1,595.6
Net debt (cash) + shareholders’ equity (capital)
$2,724.8
$2,124.1
$2,089.2
$1,578.4
$1,352.8
Other Comparative Data
Income (loss) from continuing operations / Net sales
Net income (loss) attributable to
The Timken Company / Net sales
Return on equity (2)
Net sales per employee (3)
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization
Capital expenditures / Net sales
Dividends per share
Basic earnings (loss) per share – continuing operations (4)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share –
continuing operations (4)
Basic earnings (loss) per share (5)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (5)
Net debt (cash) to capital (1)
Number of employees at year-end (6)
Number of shareholders (7)
6.1 %
6.1 %
9.9 %
$ 223.7
325.8
194.6
7.5 %
$ 0.92
$ 2.76
$ 2.74
$ 2.76
$ 2.74
2.8 %
19,052
52,218
9.9 %
8.8 %
6.6 %
9.9 %
22.1 %
$ 243.5
297.2
198.0
6.0 %
$ 0.92
$ 5.11
$ 5.07
$ 5.11
$ 5.07
(5.8 )%
19,769
50,783
8.8 %
22.4 %
$ 253.5
205.3
192.5
4.0 %
$ 0.78
$ 4.65
$ 4.59
$ 4.65
$ 4.59
2.2 %
20,954
44,238
(2.1 )%
(4.3 )%
(4.1 )%
$ 168.8
114.1
201.5
3.6 %
$ 0.45
$ (0.64 )
6.8 %
13.9 %
$ 222.2
115.8
189.7
2.9 %
$ 0.53
$ 2.76
$ 2.73
$ 2.83
$ 2.81
$ (0.64 )
$ (1.39 )
$ (1.39 )
(23.0 )%
(17.9 )%
19,839
39,118
16,667
27,127
(1) The Company presents net debt (cash) because it believes net debt (cash) is more representative of the Company’s financial position than total debt due
to the amount of cash and cash equivalents.
(2) Return on equity is defined as income from continuing operations divided by ending shareholders’ equity.
(3) Based on average number of employees employed during the year.
(4) Based on average number of shares outstanding during the year.
(5) Based on average number of shares outstanding during the year and includes discontinued operations for all periods presented.
(6) Adjusted to exclude Needle Roller Bearings operations (which was sold to JTEKT in 2009) for all periods.
(7)
Includes an estimated count of shareholders having common shares held for their accounts by banks, brokers and trustees for benefit plans.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 19
19
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportBUSINESS SUMMARY
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Over view
The Timken Company, a global industrial technology leader, applies its deep knowledge of materials, friction management and
mechanical power transmission to improve the reliability and efficiency of industrial machinery and equipment all around the
world. The Company engineers, manufactures and markets high-performance engineered steel, bearings and related mechanical
power transmission components and services. Timken® bearings, alloy steel bars and tubes as well as transmissions, gearboxes,
chain and related products and services, support diversified markets worldwide through the OEMs and aftermarket channels. The
Company operates under four segments: (1) Mobile Industries; (2) Process Industries; (3) Aerospace; and (4) Steel. The following
further describes these business segments:
• Mobile Industries provides bearings, power transmission components, engineered chain, lubrication devices and systems,
augers and related products and services to OEMs and suppliers of agricultural, construction and mining equipment;
passenger cars, light trucks, medium- and heavy-duty trucks; rail cars and locomotives. Aftermarket sales are handled
through the Company’s extensive network of authorized automotive and heavy truck distributors.
• Process Industries supplies bearings, power transmission components, engineered chains, and related products and services
to OEMs and suppliers of power transmission, energy and heavy industrial machinery and equipment. This includes rolling
mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses, cranes, hoists, drawbridges,
wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors, coal crushers, marine equipment and food processing
equipment. This segment also supports aftermarket needs through its global network of authorized industrial distributors
as well as through its industrial services team, which offers end users a broad portfolio of capabilities that include bearing,
gearbox and electric motor repair and services.
• Aerospace provides bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears
and other precision flight-critical components for commercial and military aviation applications. It also provides aftermarket
services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as well as aerospace bearing repair and
component reconditioning. Additionally, this segment manufactures precision bearings, complex assemblies and sensors for
manufacturers of health and critical motion control equipment.
• Steel manufactures alloy steel as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel. Included in its portfolio are SBQ bars and seamless
mechanical tubing. In addition, this segment supplies machining and thermal treatment services, as well as manages raw
material recycling programs. This segment’s metallurgical expertise and unique operational capabilities drive customized,
high-value solutions for the mobile, industrial and energy sectors.
The Company’s strategy balances corporate aspirations for sustained growth and a determination to optimize the Company’s
existing portfolio of business, thereby generating strong earnings and cash flows. The Company pursues its strategy to create
value by:
• Applying its knowledge of metallurgy, friction management and mechanical power transmission to create unique solutions
used in demanding applications that create value for its customers. The Company seeks to grow in attractive market sectors,
with particular emphasis on those industrial markets that value the reliability and efficiency offered by the Company’s
products and that create significant aftermarket demand, thereby providing a lifetime of opportunity in both product sales
and services.
20
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 20
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report • Differentiating its businesses and its products, offering a broad array of mechanical power transmission components, high-
performance steel and related solutions and services. In 2013 the Company announced the opening of its new industrial
service center in Raipur, India, which will provide gear drive and bearing repair and upgrade services to meet growing
customer demand for Timken industrial services outside the United States. Additionally, the Company expanded its product
portfolio, launching new Timken® SNT plummer blocks and seals, adding new Timken® encoders and designing two new
high-performance Timken® alloy steels to meet specific needs of the oil and gas industry.
• Performing with excellence, delivering exceptional results with a passion for superior execution. The Company drives
execution by embracing a continuous improvement culture that is charged with lowering costs, eliminating waste, increasing
efficiency, encouraging organizational agility and building greater brand equity. As part of this effort, the Company may also
reposition underperforming product lines and segments and divest non-strategic assets.
The following items highlight certain of the Company’s more significant strategic accomplishments in 2013:
•
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company implemented a strategy to repatriate approximately $365 million of cash,
incurring tax expense of approximately $26 million. The Company repatriated $123 million of cash in January 2014, with the
remaining portion expected to be repatriated in future periods.
• On September 5, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a plan to pursue a separation of its
steel business from the rest of the Company through a spinoff, creating a new independent, publicly traded steel company,
TimkenSteel Corporation. The transaction is expected to be tax-free to shareholders and should be completed in mid-2014,
subject to customary regulatory approvals, the receipt of a legal opinion regarding the tax-free nature of the transaction, the
execution of intercompany agreements between the Company and the new steel company, final approval of the Company’s
Board of Directors and other customary matters. One-time transaction costs in connection with the separation of the two
companies are expected to be approximately $105 million.
• On May 13, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Hamilton Gear Ltd., d/b/a Standard Machine (Standard Machine),
which provides new gearboxes, gearbox service and repair, open gearing, large gear fabrication, machining and field
technical services to end users in Canada and the western United States, for approximately $37.0 million in cash, including
cash acquired of approximately $0.1 million that was subject to a post-closing indebtedness adjustment. Based in Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan, Canada, Standard Machine employs approximately 125 associates and serves a wide variety of industrial
sectors including mining, oil and gas, and pulp and paper. In 2012, Standard Machine reported sales of approximately
$31 million. The results for Standard Machine are reported in the Process Industries segment.
• On April 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Smith Services, Inc. (Smith
Services), an electric motor repair specialist, for approximately $13.2 million. Based in Princeton, West Virginia and employing
approximately 140 associates, Smith Services had 2012 sales of approximately $17 million. The results for Smith Services are
reported in the Process Industries segment.
• On March 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Interlube Systems Ltd. (Interlube), which makes and markets
automated lubrication delivery systems and related components to end-market sectors, including commercial vehicles,
construction, mining, and heavy and general industries, for approximately $14.5 million, including cash acquired of
approximately $0.3 million, that was subject to a post-closing indebtedness adjustment. Based in Plymouth, United Kingdom,
Interlube employs about 90 associates and had 2012 sales of approximately $13 million. The results of Interlube are reported
in the Mobile Industries segment.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 21
21
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of Operations
2013 compared to 2012
OVERVIEW:
Net sales
Income from continuing operations
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to The Timken Company
Diluted earnings per share
Average number of shares – diluted
2013
2012
$ Change % Change
$ 4,341.2
263.0
0.3
$ 262.7
$ 2.74
95,823,728
$ 4,987.0
495.9
0.4
$ 495.5
$ 5.07
97,602,481
$ (645.8 )
(232.9 )
(0.1 )
$ (232.8 )
$ (2.33 )
—
(12.9 )%
(47.0 )%
(25.0 )%
(47.0 )%
(46.0 )%
(1.8 )%
The Company reported net sales for 2013 of approximately $4.3 billion, compared to approximately $5.0 billion in 2012, a
12.9% decrease. The decrease in sales was primarily due to lower volume across all business segments and lower surcharges,
partially offset by the impact of acquisitions and favorable pricing. In 2013, net income per diluted share was $2.74, compared to
$5.07 in 2012. The Company’s net income for 2013, compared to 2012, was lower due to the impact of lower volume, unfavorable
sales mix, higher manufacturing costs and separation costs due to the planned spinoff of the steel business, partially offset by
lower raw material costs (net of surcharges), lower selling, general and administrative expenses, favorable pricing and lower
restructuring charges. In addition, net income for 2013 was lower due to U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)
receipts, net of expense, of $108.0 million ($68.0 million after tax, or approximately $0.69 per diluted share) received in 2012.
The higher manufacturing costs were the result of lower plant utilization. Restructuring charges related to the closure of the
manufacturing facility in St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada (St. Thomas) were lower in 2013 compared to 2012.
OUTLOOK:
The Company’s outlook reflects its current business structure with all four operating segments in place for the full twelve months
of 2014. The Company expects sales to increase approximately 6% in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily driven by higher demand
in the industrial, off-highway, energy, defense and rail end-market sectors. The Company’s earnings are expected to be higher in
2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to higher demand and the impact from cost-reduction initiatives, with all four segments
expected to achieve double-digit operating margins.
From a liquidity standpoint, the Company expects to generate cash from operations of approximately $560 million in 2014, an
increase of $128 million or 30% over 2013, as the Company anticipates higher net income and lower pension contributions.
Pension contributions are expected to be approximately $20 million in 2014, compared to $120.7 million in 2013. The Company
expects to decrease capital expenditures to approximately $310 million in 2014, compared to $325.8 million in 2013.
22
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 22
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Statements of Income
SALES BY SEGMENT:
(Excludes intersegment sales)
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Total Company
2013
$ 1,474.3
1,231.7
329.5
1,305.7
$ 4,341.2
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,675.0
1,337.6
346.9
1,627.5
$ (200.7 )
(105.9 )
(17.4 )
(321.8 )
$ 4,987.0
$ (645.8 )
(12.0 )%
(7.9 )%
(5.0 )%
(19.8 )%
(12.9 )%
Net sales for 2013 decreased $645.8 million, or 12.9%, compared to 2012, primarily due to lower volume of approximately
$625 million across all segments. In addition, the decrease in sales reflects lower surcharges of approximately $115 million and the
impact of foreign currency exchange of approximately $10 million, partially offset by the impact of acquisitions of approximately
$85 million and favorable pricing of approximately $20 million.
GROSS PROFIT:
Gross profit
Gross profit % to net sales
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold
$ 1,092.0
25.2 %
$ 5.9
$ 1,366.3
27.4 %
$ 8.3
$ (274.3 )
—
$ (2.4 )
(20.1 )%
(220) bps
(28.9 )%
2013
2012
$ Change
Change
Gross profit decreased in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to the impact of lower sales volume of approximately $275 million,
unfavorable sales mix of approximately $50 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately $35 million, partially offset by
lower raw material costs (net of surcharges) of approximately $55 million, the impact of acquisitions of approximately $20 million
and favorable pricing of approximately $20 million.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses % to net sales
$ 626.6
14.4 %
$ 643.9
12.9 %
$ (17.3 )
—
2013
2012
$ Change
Change
(2.7 )%
150 bps
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $17.3 million in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to
lower expenses related to incentive compensation plans of approximately $30 million, partially offset by the full-year impact of
acquisitions of approximately $15 million.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 23
23
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:
Impairment charges
Severance and related benefit costs
Exit costs
Total
2013
$ 0.7
16.3
(0.6 )
$ 16.4
2012
$ Change
$ 6.6
18.4
4.5
$ 29.5
$ (5.9 )
(2.1 )
(5.1 )
$ (13.1 )
Impairment and restructuring charges decreased $13.1 million in 2013 compared to 2012. Impairment and restructuring charges
of $16.4 million in 2013 were primarily due to the recognition of severance and related benefits of approximately $10 million,
including $7.1 million of pension settlement costs, related to the closure of the manufacturing facility in St. Thomas. In addition,
impairment and restructuring charges for 2013 included severance and related benefit costs of approximately $6 million due
to cost-reduction initiatives relating to reductions in headcount in the bearings and power transmission business. Impairment
and restructuring charges of $29.5 million in 2012 were primarily due to the recognition of severance and related benefits,
including approximately $10.7 million of pension curtailment charges, as well as impairment charges, related to the closure of
the manufacturing facility in St. Thomas and the recognition of environmental remediation costs at the former manufacturing
facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil (Sao Paulo). Refer to Note 10 – Impairment and Restructuring Charges in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional discussion.
SEPARATION COSTS:
Severance and related benefit costs
Professional fees
Total
2013
$ 5.7
7.3
$ 13.0
2012
$ Change
$ —
—
$ —
$ 5.7
7.3
$ 13.0
On September 5, 2013, the Company announced its intent to pursue a separation of the Company’s steel business through a
tax-free spinoff, creating a new independent publicly traded steel company, TimkenSteel Corporation, that is expected to be
completed by mid-year 2014.
In connection with the spinoff, the Company expects to incur one-time separation costs of approximately $105 million, of which
approximately $30 million is expected to be capital. Included in these costs is approximately $15 million related to another
specific cost-reduction initiative to generate an additional $20 million of annualized savings, which are intended to mitigate the
incremental enterprise costs associated with operating two independent companies. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has
incurred approximately $13 million of separation costs related to the planned spinoff of the steel business.
INTEREST (EXPENSE) AND INCOME:
Interest (expense)
Interest income
2013
$ (24.4 )
1.9
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ (31.1 )
2.9
$ 6.7
(1.0 )
(21.5 )%
(34.5 )%
Interest expense for 2013 decreased compared to 2012 primarily due to lower average debt and higher capitalized interest.
Interest income decreased for 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to lower invested cash balances.
24
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 24
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
CDSOA (expense) receipts, net
Gain on sale of real estate in Brazil
Other income (expense), net
Total
2013
$ (2.8 )
5.4
1.0
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 108.0
$ (110.8 )
(102.6 )%
—
(6.7 )
5.4
7.7
NM
114.9 %
$ 6.4
$ (6.7 )
$ 13.1
(195.5 )%
The CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic
producers where the domestic producers have continued to invest in their technology, equipment and people. In 2013, the
Company reported expenses in connection with CDSOA of $2.8 million. In 2012, the Company reported CDSOA receipts, net of
expense, of $108 million. Refer to Note 20 – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
In November 2013, the Company finalized the sale of its former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, resulting in a $5.4 million gain.
The Company is recognizing the gain on the sale of this facility on the installment method. The Company expects to recognize an
additional gain of approximately $25 million in 2014 related to this transaction.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE:
Income tax expense
Effective tax rate
2013
$ 154.1
36.9 %
2012
$ Change
$ 270.1
35.3 %
$ (116.0 )
—
Change
(42.9 )%
160 bps
The effective tax rate on pretax income for 2013 was unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to U.S.
taxation of foreign income including U.S. taxation on cash repatriation, losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit
could be recorded, U.S. non-deductible items, including certain separation costs, and U.S. state and local taxes. These factors were
partially offset by discrete U.S. tax benefits, including certain settlements related to tax audits, U.S. foreign tax credits, earnings in
certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, the U.S. manufacturing deduction and the U.S research
tax credit.
The effective tax rate for 2012 was unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to losses at certain foreign
subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, U.S. state and local taxes and U.S. taxation of foreign income. These factors
were partially offset by earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, U.S. foreign tax credits,
the U.S. manufacturing deduction and certain discrete U.S. tax benefits.
The change in the effective tax rate in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to U.S. taxation of foreign income, including U.S.
taxation on cash repatriation, losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded and higher U.S. state and
local taxes, partially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits, higher U.S. manufacturing deduction and the net effect of other discrete items.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 25
25
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS SEGMENTS:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is earnings before
interest and taxes (EBIT). Refer to Note 15 – Segment Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the
reconciliation of EBIT by segment to consolidated income before income taxes.
The presentation of segment results below includes a reconciliation of the changes in net sales for each segment reported in
accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of acquisitions made in 2013 and 2012 and currency
exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates on net sales are removed to allow investors and the
Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the
fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Wazee Companies, LLC (Wazee).
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Interlube. Results for Interlube are reported in the
Mobile Industries segment. During the second quarter of 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Standard Machine, as
well as substantially all of the assets of Smith Services. Results for Standard Machine, Smith Services and Wazee are reported in the
Process Industries segment.
MOBILE INDUSTRIES SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Acquisitions
Currency
2013
$ 1,475.4
$ 164.7
11.2 %
2013
$ 1,475.4
27.0
(11.5 )
2012
$ Change
Change
$ 1,675.5
$ 208.1
12.4 %
$ (200.1 )
$ (43.4 )
—
(11.9 )%
(20.9 )%
(120) bps
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,675.5
—
—
$ (200.1 )
27.0
(11.5 )
(11.9 )%
NM
NM
(12.9 )%
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency
$ 1,459.9
$ 1,675.5
$ (215.6 )
The Mobile Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 12.9%
in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $220 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of
approximately $5 million. The lower volume was driven by a 20% decrease in off-highway, primarily in mining and agriculture
sectors. In addition, heavy truck declined 18% and light vehicle declined 14% primarily due to planned program exits. EBIT
decreased in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to the impact of lower volume of approximately $80 million and higher
manufacturing costs of approximately $20 million, partially offset by lower restructuring charges of approximately $15 million,
lower material costs of approximately $15 million, lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $15 million,
favorable pricing of approximately $5 million and a gain on the sale at the Company’s former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo
of approximately $5 million. Restructuring charges related to the closure of the manufacturing facility in St. Thomas were lower in
2013 compared to 2012.
Sales for the Mobile Industries segment are expected to decrease by 3% to 8% in 2014 compared to 2013. The expected decrease
is primarily due to a decrease in lower light-vehicle volume of approximately 30%, driven by planned program exits, partially offset
by an increase in off-highway volume of approximately 5% and an increase in rail volume of approximately 5%. EBIT for the Mobile
Industries segment is expected to remain approximately the same in 2014 compared to 2013 as a result of the recognition of an
additional gain related to the Company’s former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo offset by the impact of lower volume.
26
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 26
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PROCESS INDUSTRIES SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Acquisitions
Currency
2013
$ 1,235.6
$ 201.9
16.3 %
2013
$ 1,235.6
59.0
0.7
2012
$ Change
Change
$ 1,343.3
$ 274.9
20.5 %
$ (107.7 )
$ (73.0 )
—
(8.0 )%
(26.6 )%
(420) bps
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,343.3
—
—
$ (107.7 )
59.0
0.7
(8.0 )%
NM
NM
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency
$ 1,175.9
$ 1,343.3
$ (167.4 )
(12.5 )%
The Process Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 12.5% for
2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to decreases in volume of approximately $185 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of
approximately $15 million. EBIT in 2013 decreased compared to 2012 primarily due to the impact of lower volume of approximately
$90 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately $15 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of approximately
$15 million and lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $10 million.
Sales for the Process Industries segment are expected to increase 7% to 12% in 2014 compared to 2013 as a result of increased
demand across most industrial end-market sectors. EBIT for the Process Industries segment is expected to increase in 2014
compared to 2013 due to increased volume.
AEROSPACE SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Currency
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency
2013
$ 329.5
$ 26.6
8.1 %
2013
$ 329.5
0.5
$ 329.0
2012
$ Change
Change
$ 346.9
$ 36.3
10.5 %
$ (17.4 )
$ (9.7 )
—
(5.0 )%
(26.7 )%
(240) bps
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 346.9
—
$ (17.4 )
0.5
$ 346.9
$ (17.9 )
(5.0 )%
NM
(5.2 )%
The Aerospace segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes, decreased 5.2% for 2013 compared to 2012.
The decrease was due to lower volume of approximately $20 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of approximately
$2 million. The decrease in volume was driven by a decrease in the critical motion market sector of approximately 15% and the
defense market sector of approximately 4%. EBIT decreased in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to higher manufacturing
costs of approximately $15 million and the impact of lower volume of approximately $7 million, partially offset by lower selling,
general and administrative expenses of approximately $5 million and favorable pricing of approximately $2 million.
Sales for the Aerospace segment are expected to increase by approximately 5% to 10% in 2014 compared to 2013, due to increased
demand in both the defense and critical motion market sectors. EBIT for the Aerospace segment is expected to increase in 2014
compared to 2013 as a result of higher volume and lower manufacturing expenses.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 27
27
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
STEEL SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Currency
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency
2013
$ 1,380.8
$ 140.2
10.2 %
2013
$ 1,380.8
1.1
$ 1,379.7
2012
$ Change
Change
$ 1,728.7
$ 251.8
14.6 %
$ (347.9 )
$ (111.6 )
—
(20.1 )%
(44.3 )%
(440) bps
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,728.7
—
$ (347.9 )
1.1
$ 1,728.7
$ (349.0 )
(20.1 )%
NM
(20.2 )%
The Steel segment’s net sales for 2013, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes, decreased 20.2% compared to 2012. The
decrease was primarily due to lower volume of approximately $230 million and lower surcharges of approximately $115 million.
The lower volume was led by decreases in industrial demand of approximately 35% and oil and gas demand of approximately
30%, partially offset by an increase in mobile demand of approximately 10%.
Surcharges decreased to $300 million in 2013 from approximately $415 million in 2012. Approximately 60% of the decrease in
surcharges was a result of lower volume. The remaining portion was a result of lower market prices for certain input raw materials,
especially scrap steel, nickel and molybdenum. Surcharges are a pricing mechanism that the Company uses to recover scrap steel,
energy and certain alloy costs, which are derived from published monthly indices.
Amounts are shown in whole values
Scrap index per ton
Shipments (in tons)
Average selling price per ton, including surcharges
2013
$ 405
919,000
$ 1,503
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 429
1,070,000
$ 1,615
$ (24 )
(151,000 )
$ (112 )
(5.6 )%
(14.1 )%
(6.9 )%
The decrease in the average selling price was primarily the result of lower volume and surcharges.
The Steel segment’s EBIT decreased $111.6 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to lower surcharges of approximately
$115 million, the impact of lower volume of approximately $95 million, unfavorable mix of approximately $50 million and higher
LIFO expense of approximately $17 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $150 million and lower
logistics and manufacturing costs of approximately $15 million. In 2013, the Steel segment recognized an increase in its LIFO
reserve of $1.1 million, compared to a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $15.6 million in 2012. The change in LIFO was due to lower
inventory levels and the mix of inventory. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys
and energy, decreased 14% in 2013 compared to the prior year to an average cost of $463 per ton.
Sales for the Steel segment are expected to increase 12% to 17% in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to higher volume and
higher surcharges. The Company expects higher volume to be driven by increases in oil and gas and industrial demand of over
20% each, with mobile demand remaining relatively flat. EBIT for the Steel segment is expected to increase in 2014 compared to
2013 driven by higher volume, higher surcharges and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by higher raw material costs and
higher LIFO expense. Scrap, alloy and energy costs are expected to increase in the near term from current levels.
CORPORATE:
Corporate expenses
Corporate expenses % to net sales
2013
2012
$ Change
Change
$ 82.5
1.9 %
$ 84.4
1.7 %
$ (1.9 )
—
(2.3 )%
20 bps
Corporate expenses decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to lower expense related to incentive compensation plans.
28
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 28
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations:
2012 compared to 2011
OVERVIEW:
Net sales
Income from continuing operations
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to The Timken Company
Diluted earnings per share
Average number of shares – diluted
2012
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 4,987.0
495.9
0.4
$ 495.5
$ 5.07
97,602,481
$ 5,170.2
456.6
2.3
$ 454.3
$ 4.59
98,655,513
$ (183.2 )
39.3
(1.9 )
$ 41.2
$ 0.48
—
(3.5 )%
8.6 %
(82.6 )%
9.1 %
10.5 %
(1.1 )%
The Company reported net sales for 2012 of approximately $5.0 billion, compared to approximately $5.2 billion in 2011, a 3.5%
decrease. The sales decrease reflects lower volume across all business segments except for the Aerospace segment, lower
surcharges and the effect of currency rate changes, partially offset by favorable pricing and the impact of acquisitions. In 2012,
net income per diluted share was $5.07, compared to $4.59 in 2011. The Company’s earnings for 2012 reflected CDSOA receipts,
net of expense, of $108.0 million ($68.0 million after tax, or approximately $0.69 per diluted share), as well as favorable pricing,
lower material costs and the impact of prior-year acquisitions, partially offset by lower material surcharges, the impact of lower
volume, higher manufacturing costs and restructuring charges related to the announced closure of the manufacturing facility in
St. Thomas. The higher manufacturing costs were the result of lower plant utilization.
The Statements of Income
SALES BY SEGMENT:
(Excludes intersegment sales)
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Total Company
2012
$ 1,675.0
1,337.6
346.9
1,627.5
$ 4,987.0
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,768.9
1,240.5
324.1
1,836.7
$ (93.9 )
97.1
22.8
(209.2 )
$ 5,170.2
$ (183.2 )
(5.3 )%
7.8 %
7.0 %
(11.4 )%
(3.5 )%
Net sales for 2012 decreased $183.2 million, or 3.5%, compared to 2011, primarily due to lower volume of approximately
$300 million principally driven by the Steel segment and the Mobile Industries’ heavy truck and light-vehicle market sectors. In
addition, the decrease in sales reflects lower surcharges of approximately $155 million and the effect of currency rate changes
of approximately $75 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of $190 million and the impact of prior-year acquisitions of
$160 million.
GROSS PROFIT:
Gross profit
Gross profit % to net sales
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold
$ 1,366.3
27.4 %
$ 8.3
$ 1,369.7
26.5 %
$ 6.7
$ (3.4 )
—
$ 1.6
(0.2)%
90 bps
23.9 %
2012
2011
$ Change
Change
Gross profit decreased in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to lower surcharges of approximately $160 million, the impact
of lower sales volume of approximately $150 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately $75 million, mostly offset
by favorable pricing of approximately $190 million, lower raw material and logistics costs of approximately $155 million and the
impact from prior-year acquisitions of approximately $40 million.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 29
29
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses % to net sales
2012
$ 643.9
12.9 %
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 626.2
12.1 %
$ 17.7
—
2.8 %
80 bps
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $17.7 million in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily due to the
full-year impact of acquisitions of approximately $15 million and higher salaries and related benefits of approximately $15 million,
partially offset by lower expense related to incentive compensation plans of approximately $15 million.
IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:
Impairment charges
Severance and related benefit costs
Exit costs
Total
2012
$ 6.6
18.4
4.5
$ 29.5
2011
$ Change
$ 0.5
0.1
13.8
$ 14.4
$ 6.1
18.3
(9.3 )
$ 15.1
Impairment and restructuring charges increased $15.1 million in 2012 compared to 2011. Impairment and restructuring charges
of $29.5 million in 2012 were primarily due to the recognition of severance and related benefits, including $10.7 million of
pension curtailment charges, as well as impairment charges related to the announced closure of the manufacturing facility in
St. Thomas and the recognition of environmental remediation costs at the former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo. Impairment
and restructuring charges of $14.4 million in 2011 were primarily related to environmental remediation costs and workers
compensation claims by former associates at the former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo. Refer to Note 10 – Impairment and
Restructuring Charges in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
INTEREST (EXPENSE) AND INCOME:
Interest (expense)
Interest income
2012
$ (31.1 )
$ 2.9
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ (36.8 )
$ 5.6
$ 5.7
$ (2.7 )
(15.5 )%
(48.2 )%
Interest expense for 2012 decreased compared to 2011 primarily due to lower average debt and higher capitalized interest.
Interest income decreased for 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to lower invested cash balances.
30
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 30
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME:
CDSOA receipts (expense), net
Other (expense), net
2012
$ 108.0
(6.7 )
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ (1.1 )
—
$ 109.1
(6.7 )
NM
NM
The Company reported CDSOA receipts, net of expense, of $108.0 million in 2012. In 2012, the Company reported expenses in
excess of CDSOA receipts of $1.1 million. Refer to Note 20 – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Other (expense), net increased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to higher foreign currency exchange losses and higher
losses from the disposal of fixed assets. Other (expense), net for 2012 also includes the loss on the divestiture of its interest in
Advanced Green Components (AGC) of $2.0 million.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE:
Income tax expense
Effective tax rate
2012
$ 270.1
35.3 %
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 240.2
34.5 %
$ 29.9
—
12.4 %
80 bps
The effective tax rate on pretax income for 2012 was unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to losses
at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, including restructuring charges related to the closure of the
Company’s manufacturing facility in St. Thomas, U.S. state and local taxes and U.S. taxation of foreign income. These factors were
partially offset by earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, U.S. foreign tax credits, the
U.S. manufacturing deduction and certain discrete U.S. tax benefits.
The effective tax rate for 2011 was favorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to earnings in certain foreign
jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%, the U.S. manufacturing deduction, the U.S. research tax credit and the
net effect of other U.S. tax items, partially offset by losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded,
U.S. state and local taxes and the net effect of other discrete items.
The change in the effective tax rate in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily due to losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no
tax benefit could be recorded, including restructuring charges related to the closure of the Company’s manufacturing facility in
St. Thomas, and higher U.S. state and local taxes, partially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits, and the net effect of other discrete items.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 31
31
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS SEGMENTS:
The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is EBIT. Refer to
Note 15 – Segment Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the reconciliation of EBIT by segment to
consolidated income before income taxes.
The presentation of segment results below includes a reconciliation of the changes in net sales for each segment reported in
accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of acquisitions made in 2011 and currency exchange
rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates on net sales are removed to allow investors and the Company to
meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the third quarter
of 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Philadelphia Gear, which is reported in the
Process Industries segment. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Drives. Results for
Drives are reported in the Mobile and Process Industries segments based on customer application. The acquisition of the assets of
Wazee, which was completed on December 31, 2012, had no impact on the 2012 operating results.
MOBILE INDUSTRIES SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Acquisitions
Currency
2012
$ 1,675.5
$ 208.1
12.4 %
2012
$ 1,675.5
65.4
(53.5 )
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 1,769.4
$ 261.8
14.8 %
$ (93.9 )
$ (53.7 )
—
(5.3 )%
(20.5 )%
(240) bps
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,769.4
—
—
$ (93.9 )
65.4
(53.5 )
(5.3 )%
NM
NM
(6.0 )%
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency
$ 1,663.6
$ 1,769.4
$ (105.8 )
The Mobile Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 6.0% in
2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $120 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of
$15 million and higher surcharges of $5 million. The lower volume was led by a decrease in light-vehicle volume of approximately
20%, driven by exited business, and a decrease in heavy truck volume of approximately 20%, partially offset by an increase in
rail volume of approximately 20%. EBIT decreased in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to the impact of lower volume of
approximately $45 million, restructuring costs of approximately $30 million due to the closure of the St. Thomas plant and higher
manufacturing and material costs of approximately $25 million, partially offset by favorable pricing of approximately $15 million,
lower logistics costs of approximately $15 million and higher surcharges of approximately $5 million.
32
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 32
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PROCESS INDUSTRIES SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Acquisitions
Currency
2012
$ 1,343.3
$ 274.9
20.5 %
2012
$ 1,343.3
94.2
(21.4 )
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 1,244.6
$ 274.2
22.0 %
$ 98.7
$ 0.7
—
7.9 %
0.3 %
(150) bps
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,244.6
—
—
$ 98.7
94.2
(21.4 )
7.9 %
NM
NM
2.1 %
Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency
$ 1,270.5
$ 1,244.6
$ 25.9
The Process Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the effect of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, increased 2.1% for 2012
compared to 2011, primarily due to favorable pricing of approximately $25 million. EBIT in 2012 was comparable to 2011 due to
favorable pricing of $25 million and the impact of prior-year acquisitions of $15 million, mostly offset by higher manufacturing
costs of approximately $20 million, the negative impact of currency of approximately $10 million and the impact of unfavorable
sales mix of approximately $5 million.
AEROSPACE SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Currency
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency
2012
$ 346.9
$ 36.3
10.5 %
2012
$ 346.9
(1.1 )
$ 348.0
2011
$ Change
$ 324.1
$ 5.1
1.6 %
$ 22.8
$ 31.2
—
Change
7.0 %
NM
890 bps
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 324.1
—
$ 22.8
(1.1 )
$ 324.1
$ 23.9
7.0 %
NM
7.4 %
The Aerospace segment’s net sales, excluding the effect of currency-rate changes, increased 7.4% for 2012 compared to 2011. The
increase was due to higher volume of approximately $20 million and favorable pricing of approximately $5 million. The increase in
volume was driven by increased demand in the critical motion market sector of approximately 15% and the defense market sector
of approximately 10%. EBIT increased in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to the impact of higher volume of approximately
$10 million, favorable pricing of approximately $5 million, lower manufacturing costs of approximately $5 million and lower
selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $5 million. The lower manufacturing costs were due to lower
product warranty charges of approximately $4 million in 2012 compared to 2011, and an inventory write-down of approximately
$3 million recognized in 2011.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 33
33
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
STEEL SEGMENT:
Net sales, including intersegment sales
EBIT
EBIT margin
Net sales, including intersegment sales
Less: Currency
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency
2012
$ 1,728.7
$ 251.8
14.6 %
2012
$ 1,728.7
(1.0 )
$ 1,729.7
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 1,956.5
$ 267.4
13.7 %
$ (227.8 )
$ (15.6 )
—
(11.6 )%
(5.8 )%
90 bps
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 1,956.5
—
$ (227.8 )
(1.0 )
$ 1,956.5
$ (226.8 )
(11.6 )%
NM
(11.6 )%
The Steel segment’s net sales for 2012, excluding the impact of currency-rate changes, decreased 11.6% compared to 2011. The
decrease was primarily due to lower volume of approximately $220 million and lower surcharges of approximately $165 million,
partially offset by higher pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $155 million. The lower volume was led by a decrease
in industrial demand of approximately 25%, a decrease in oil and gas demand of approximately 15% and a decrease in mobile
demand of approximately 5%.
Surcharges decreased to approximately $415 million in 2012 from approximately $580 million in 2011. Approximately 60% of the
decrease in surcharges was a result of lower volumes. The remaining portion was a result of lower market prices for certain input
raw materials, especially scrap steel, nickel and molybdenum.
Amounts are shown in whole values
Scrap index per ton
Shipments (in tons)
Average selling price per ton, including surcharges
2012
$ 429
1,070,000
$ 1,615
2011
$ Change
% Change
$ 485
1,286,000
$ 1,522
$ (56 )
(216,000 )
$ 93
(11.5 )%
(16.8 )%
6.1 %
The increase in the average selling price was primarily the result of higher pricing, partially offset by lower surcharges.
The Steel segment’s EBIT decreased $15.6 million in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to lower surcharges of approximately
$165 million, the impact of lower volume of approximately $100 million and higher manufacturing costs of approximately $55 million,
partially offset by favorable pricing of approximately $140 million, lower raw material costs of approximately $140 million and lower
LIFO expense of approximately $30 million. In 2012, the Steel segment recognized LIFO income of $15.6 million, compared to LIFO
expense of $15.2 million in 2011. The change in LIFO was due to lower inventory levels and the mix of inventory. Raw material costs
consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys and energy, decreased 8% in 2012 compared to the prior year
to an average cost of $510 per ton.
CORPORATE:
Corporate expenses
Corporate expenses % to net sales
2012
2011
$ Change
Change
$ 84.4
1.7 %
$ 80.8
1.6 %
$ 3.6
—
4.5%
10 bps
Corporate expenses increased in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to higher salaries and related benefits of $5 million and
higher professional fees of $4 million, partially offset by lower expense related to incentive compensation plans of $4 million.
34
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 34
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Balance Sheets
The following discussion is a comparison of the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories, net
Deferred income taxes
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
Other current assets
Total current assets
December 31,
2013
$ 384.6
15.1
566.7
809.9
69.8
27.6
63.8
$ 1,937.5
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 586.4
15.1
546.7
862.1
86.5
12.6
52.6
$ (201.8 )
—
20.0
(52.2 )
(16.7 )
15.0
11.2
(34.4 )%
NM
3.7 %
(6.1 )%
(19.3 )%
119.0 %
21.3 %
$ 2,162.0
$ (224.5 )
(10.4 )%
Refer to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for a discussion of the decrease in cash and cash equivalents. Accounts
receivable, net increased as a result of higher sales in December 2013 compared to December 2012, and a lower allowance for
doubtful accounts of $1.9 million. Inventories decreased across all businesses to match current demand, partially offset by the
impact of current year acquisitions. Deferred income taxes decreased while deferred charges and prepaid expenses increased
due to a reclassification of income taxes related to intercompany transactions. Other current assets increased primarily due to the
recognition of receivables related to the sale of real estate in Sao Paulo of approximately $14 million.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET:
Property, plant and equipment
Less: allowances for depreciation
Property, plant and equipment, net
December 31,
2013
$ 4,078.1
(2,520.0 )
$ 1,558.1
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 3,792.1
(2,386.8 )
$ 286.0
(133.2 )
$ 1,405.3
$ 152.8
7.5 %
(5.6 )%
10.9 %
The increase in property, plant and equipment, net in 2013 was primarily due to capital expenditures in 2013 exceeding
depreciation expense. See “Other Disclosures – Capital Expenditures” for more information.
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill
Non-current pension assets
Other intangible assets
Deferred income taxes
Other non-current assets
Total other assets
December 31,
2013
$ 358.7
342.6
219.1
10.1
51.8
$ 982.3
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 338.9
0.2
224.7
74.1
39.0
$ 19.8
342.4
(5.6 )
(64.0 )
12.8
$ 676.9
$ 305.4
5.8 %
NM
(2.5 )%
(86.4 )%
32.8 %
45.1 %
The increase in goodwill was primarily due to acquisitions completed in 2013. The increase in non-current pension assets was
primarily due to an increase in the discount rate used to measure the projected benefit obligation from 4% to 5%, as well as
pension asset returns in excess of expectations, both of which are primarily related to U.S. pension plans. The decrease in other
intangible assets was primarily due to current-year amortization expense exceeding intangibles acquired in 2013. The decrease
in deferred income taxes was primarily due to the recognition of certain tax deductible items, primarily related to accelerated
tax depreciation, which are recognized in different periods for tax and financial reporting purposes, as well as the reduction of
pension and postretirement liabilities. The increase in other non-current assets was primarily due to receivables of approximately
$11 million extending beyond one year related to the sale of real estate in Sao Paulo.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 35
35
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term debt
Accounts payable
Salaries, wages and benefits
Income taxes payable
Deferred income taxes
Other current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
December 31,
2013
$ 18.6
222.5
183.1
107.1
7.6
190.5
250.7
$ 980.1
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 14.3
216.2
213.9
33.5
2.8
177.5
9.6
$ 4.3
6.3
(30.8 )
73.6
4.8
13.0
241.1
30.1 %
2.9 %
(14.4 )%
219.7 %
171.4 %
7.3 %
2,511.5 %
$ 667.8
$ 312.3
46.8 %
The increase in short-term debt during 2013 was primarily to provide liquidity for non-U.S. inter-company dividends. Salaries,
wages and benefits decreased primarily due to the reduction in accruals for incentive based compensation plans. The increase
in income taxes payable was primarily due to the provision for current-year income taxes and a reclassification of uncertain
tax positions from other non-current liabilities to income taxes payable. These increases were partially offset by current-year
tax payments. The increase in other current liabilities was primarily due to the recognition of a deferred gain of approximately
$25 million related to the sale of real estate in Sao Paulo, partially offset by lower restructuring accruals. The increase in the current
portion of long-term debt was primarily due to the reclassification of the Company’s $250 million fixed-rate senior unsecured
notes, which mature in September 2014, from non-current liabilities to current liabilities.
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt
Accrued pension cost
Accrued postretirement benefits cost
Deferred income taxes
Other non-current liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
December 31,
2013
$ 206.6
179.0
233.9
166.9
62.8
$ 849.2
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 455.1
391.4
371.8
4.5
107.0
$ (248.5 )
(212.4 )
(137.9 )
162.4
(44.2 )
$ 1,329.8
$ (480.6 )
(54.6 )%
(54.3 )%
(37.1 )%
NM
(41.3 )%
(36.1 )%
The decrease in long-term debt was primarily due to the reclassification of the Company’s $250 million fixed-rate senior unsecured
notes, which mature in September 2014, to current liabilities. The decrease in accrued pension cost was primarily due to an
increase in the discount rate used to measure the projected benefit obligation, as well as favorable returns on pension assets and
$121 million in contributions, which changed the U.S. pension plans from underfunded to overfunded requiring a reclassification
to non-current pension assets for 2013. The decrease in accrued postretirement benefits cost was primarily due to an increase in
the discount rate used to measure the accumulated benefit obligation. The increase in deferred income taxes related primarily
to the reduction of pension and postretirement liabilities. The decrease in other non-current liabilities was primarily due to a
reclassification of uncertain tax positions to current income taxes payable.
36
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 36
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock
Earnings invested in the business
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Treasury shares
Noncontrolling interest
Total equity
December 31,
2013
$ 949.5
2,586.4
(626.1 )
(273.2 )
12.0
$ 2,648.6
2012
$ Change
% Change
$ 944.5
2,411.2
(1,013.2 )
(110.3 )
14.4
$ 5.0
175.2
387.1
(162.9 )
(2.4 )
0.5 %
7.3 %
(38.2 )%
(147.7 )%
(16.7 )%
$ 2,246.6
$ 402.0
17.9 %
Earnings invested in the business increased in 2013 by net income attributable to the Company of $262.7 million, partially offset
by dividends of $87.5 million. The decrease in the accumulated other comprehensive loss was primarily due to a $398.3 million
after tax pension and postretirement liability adjustment, partially offset by $11.5 million from foreign currency translation. The
pension and postretirement liability adjustment was primarily due to an increase in the discount rate used to measure pension
and postretirement plan obligations, as well as higher than expected returns on plan assets and the realization of actuarial losses
in 2013. The foreign currency translation adjustment was due to the U.S. dollar strengthening relative to other currencies, such as
the Australian dollar, the Indian rupee, the South African rand, the Canadian dollar and the Brazilian real. The increase in treasury
shares was primarily due to the Company’s purchase of 3.4 million of its common shares for an aggregate of $189.2 million,
partially offset by shares issued pursuant to stock compensation plans.
CASH FLOWS:
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used by investing activities
Net cash used by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
2013
$ 430.0
(376.0 )
(249.3 )
(6.5 )
2012
$ Change
$ 624.1
(297.7 )
(208.6 )
3.8
$ (194.1 )
(78.3 )
(40.7 )
(10.3 )
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
$ (201.8 )
$ 121.6
$ (323.4 )
Operating activities provided net cash of $430.0 million in 2013, compared to $624.1 million in 2012. The change in cash from
operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in net income, as well as the impact of incomes taxes and lower cash provided
by working capital items. These decreases in cash were partially offset by lower pension contributions and other postretirement
benefit payments. Net income attributable to The Timken Company decreased by $232.8 million in 2013 compared to 2012. Income
taxes, including deferred income taxes, provided cash of $34.8 million in 2013, compared to $144.8 million in 2012. Pension and
other postretirement benefit contributions and payments were $158.0 million in 2013, compared to $412.7 million in 2012.
The following chart displays the impact of working capital items on cash during 2013 and 2012:
Cash Provided (Used):
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Trade accounts payable
Other accrued expenses
2013
2012
$ (13.4 )
62.5
3.5
(38.5 )
$ 103.0
102.5
(73.2 )
(54.0 )
Investing activities used cash of $376.0 million in 2013 compared to $297.7 million in 2012. The increase was primarily due to a
$43.5 million increase in cash used for acquisitions and a $28.6 million increase in cash used for capital expenditures, as well as
an $8.8 million reduction in cash provided by investments in short-term marketable securities. Short-term marketable securities
provided cash of $5.5 million in 2013 after providing cash of $14.3 million in 2012.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 37
37
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net cash used by financing activities was $249.3 million and $208.6 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in cash
used for financing activities was primarily due to increased purchases of common shares in 2013. The Company purchased
3.4 million of its common shares for an aggregate of $189.2 million in 2013 after purchasing 2.5 million of its common shares for
an aggregate of $112.3 million in 2012. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $30 million on payments
of long-term debt.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total debt was $475.9 million and $479.0 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Debt exceeded cash
and cash equivalents by $76.2 million at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents exceeded debt by
$122.5 million. The ratio of net debt (cash) to capital was 2.8% at December 31, 2013. The ratio of net debt (cash) to capital was
(5.8)% at December 31, 2012.
Reconciliation of total debt to net (cash) debt and the ratio of net (cash) debt to capital:
NET DEBT:
Short-term debt
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt
Total debt
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Net debt (cash)
RATIO OF NET DEBT TO CAPITAL:
Net debt (cash)
Total equity
Capital (net debt (cash) + total equity)
Ratio of net debt (cash) to capital
December 31,
2013
$ 18.6
250.7
206.6
$ 475.9
384.6
15.1
2012
$ 14.3
9.6
455.1
$ 479.0
586.4
15.1
$ 76.2
$ (122.5 )
December 31,
2013
$ 76.2
2,648.6
$ 2,724.8
2012
$ (122.5 )
2,246.6
$ 2,124.1
2.8 %
(5.8 )%
The Company presents net debt (cash) because it believes net debt (cash) is more representative of the Company’s financial
position than total debt due to the amount of cash and cash equivalents.
On November 30, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year Amended and Restated Accounts Receivable Securitization
Financing Agreement (Asset Securitization Agreement), which provides for borrowings up to $200 million, subject to certain
borrowing base limitations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the Company. At December 31, 2013, the
Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement; however, certain borrowing base limitations
reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization Agreement to $149.3 million.
The Company has a $500 million Senior Credit Facility that matures on May 11, 2016. At December 31, 2013, the Company had no
outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $8.6 million, which reduced
the availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $491.4 million. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has two financial
covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At December 31, 2013, the Company was in
full compliance with the covenants under the Senior Credit Facility. The maximum consolidated leverage ratio permitted under
the Senior Credit Facility is 3.25 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio was 0.72 to 1.0. The
minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio permitted under the Senior Credit Facility is 4.0 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2013, the
Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio was 18.86 to 1.0.
38
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 38
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The interest rate under the Senior Credit Facility is based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, the Company
pays a facility fee based on the consolidated leverage ratio multiplied by the aggregate commitments of all of the lenders under
the Senior Credit Facility.
Other sources of liquidity include short-term and long-term lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, which
provide for borrowings up to $217.0 million in the aggregate. The majority of these lines are uncommitted. At December 31, 2013,
the Company had borrowings outstanding of $19.8 million, which reduced the availability under these facilities to $197.2 million.
The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash on hand will be met by the committed funds available under
its Asset Securitization Agreement and the Senior Credit Facility. Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its
obligations through at least the term of the Senior Credit Facility.
At December 31, 2013, approximately $274.1 million, or 71%, of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents resided in jurisdictions
outside the United States. Repatriation of these funds to the United States could be subject to domestic and foreign taxes and
an immaterial amount could be subject to governmental restrictions. In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company implemented
a strategy to repatriate approximately $365 million of cash, incurring tax expense of approximately $26 million. The Company
repatriated $123 million of cash in January 2014, with the remaining portion expected to be repatriated in future periods. The
Company had undistributed earnings related to its international subsidiaries of $577.9 million at December 31, 2013. A deferred
tax liability of $8.7 million has been accrued at December 31, 2013 for earnings of $136.1 million (relating to the $365 million cash
repatriation strategy) that are available to be repatriated to the U.S. No provisions for U.S. income taxes have been made with
respect to earnings of $441.8 million that are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the United States. The amount of U.S.
income taxes that may be applicable to such earnings is $23.3 million if such earnings were repatriated, net of foreign tax credits.
Part of the Company’s strategy is to grow in attractive market sectors, many of which are outside the United States. This strategy
may include making investments in facilities and equipment and potential new acquisitions. The Company plans to fund these
investments, as well as meet working capital requirements, with cash and cash equivalents and unused lines of credit within the
geographic location of these investments when possible.
The Company expects to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. However, the Company may need to limit its borrowings
under the Senior Credit Facility or other facilities in order to remain in compliance. As of December 31, 2013, the Company could
have borrowed the full amounts available under the Senior Credit Facility and Asset Securitization Agreement, and would have
still been in compliance with its debt covenants.
The Company has $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured notes which mature in September 2014. The Company plans to refinance
the unsecured notes in advance of their maturities.
The Company expects cash from operations in 2014 to increase to approximately $560 million from $430 million in 2013, as
the Company anticipates higher net income and lower pension contributions. The Company expects to make approximately
$20 million in pension contributions in 2014, compared to $120.7 million in 2013. The Company also expects to decrease capital
expenditures to approximately $310 million in 2014 compared to $325.8 million in 2013.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 39
39
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS:
The Company’s contractual debt obligations and contractual commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2013 were as follows:
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD:
Contractual Obligations
Interest payments
Long-term debt, including current portion
Short-term debt
Operating leases
Purchase commitments
Retirement benefits
Total
$ 165.9
457.3
18.6
125.7
121.3
2,689.8
Less than
1 Year
$ 20.2
250.7
18.6
37.9
93.1
284.3
1–3 Years
3–5 Years
$ 24.1
16.4
—
52.5
25.8
574.1
$ 21.9
5.0
—
22.7
2.4
546.1
More than
5 Years
$ 99.7
185.2
—
12.6
—
1,285.3
Total
$ 3,578.6
$ 704.8
$ 692.9
$ 598.1
$ 1,582.8
The interest payments beyond five years primarily relate to medium-term notes that mature over the next 15 years.
Purchase commitments are defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on the
Company. Included in purchase commitments above are certain obligations related to take or pay contracts, capital commitments,
service agreements and utilities. Many of these commitments relate to take or pay contracts, in which the Company guarantees
payment to ensure availability of products or services. These purchase commitments do not represent the entire anticipated
purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which the Company is contractually obligated. The majority of the
Company’s products and services are purchased as needed, with no commitment.
Retirement benefits represent pension and health care payments expected to be paid to retirees or their beneficiaries over the
next ten years. These payments are largely covered by pension and postretirement benefit plan assets.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $49.5 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. The Company
anticipates a decrease in its unrecognized tax positions of $30 million to $35 million during the next 12 months. The anticipated
decrease is primarily due to settlements with tax authorities. Future tax positions are not known at this time and therefore not
included in the above summary of the Company’s fixed contractual obligations. Refer to Note 16 – Income Taxes in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
During 2013, the Company made cash contributions of approximately $120.7 million to its global defined benefit pension plans,
of which $105.0 million was discretionary. The Company currently expects to make contributions to its global defined benefit
pension plans totaling approximately $20 million in 2014, none of which is discretionary. The Company may consider making
discretionary contributions to either its global defined benefit pension plans or its postretirement benefit plans during 2014.
Returns for the Company’s global defined benefit pension plan assets in 2013 were 10.8%, above the expected rate of return of
8.0% due to broad increases in global equity markets. The higher returns positively impacted the funded status of the plans at the
end of 2013 and are expected to result in lower pension expense in future years. Refer to Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans and
Note 14 – Postretirement Benefit Plans in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
During 2013, the Company purchased 3.4 million of its common shares for approximately $189.2 million in the aggregate under
the Company’s 2012 common share purchase plan. This plan authorizes the Company to buy, in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions, up to 10 million common shares, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes.
The authorization expires on December 31, 2015.
As disclosed in Note 9 – Contingencies and Note 16 – Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the
Company has exposure for certain legal and tax matters.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
40
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 40
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCMENTS:
Information required for this Item is incorporated by reference to Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES:
The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. The following paragraphs include a discussion of some critical areas that require a higher
degree of judgment, estimates and complexity.
REVENUE RECOGNITION:
The Company recognizes revenue when title passes to the customer. This occurs at the shipping point except for goods sold by
certain foreign entities and certain exported goods, where title passes when the goods reach their destination. Selling prices are
fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in net
sales and the related costs are included in cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In July 2011, the Company acquired the assets of Philadelphia Gear. Philadelphia Gear recognizes a portion of its revenues on
the percentage of completion method. In 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized approximately $45 million and $60 million,
respectively, in net sales under the percentage of completion method.
INVENTORY:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 54% valued by the LIFO method and the remaining
46% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The majority of the Company’s domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO
method, and all of the Company’s international inventories are valued by the FIFO method. An actual valuation of the inventory
under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly,
interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these
are subject to many factors beyond management’s control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to
the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. The Company recognized a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $2.3 million during 2013
compared to a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $7.1 million during 2012.
GOODWILL:
The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its
annual impairment test as of October first, after the annual forecasting process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill is reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Each interim
period, management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present that would necessitate that a
goodwill impairment analysis be performed in an interim period other than during the fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. Step one compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its
estimated fair value. To the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair values, step two is
performed, where the reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent
that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and must be recognized.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. Prior to 2012, the Company’s reporting units were
the same as its reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries, Aerospace and Steel. During 2012, management
began reviewing goodwill for impairment at a level below the segment level for the Process Industries and Aerospace segments.
This change was necessitated by a change in management structure, as well as the level of review of financial information by
management within the Aerospace segment, and the acquisition of the assets of Philadelphia Gear. Philadelphia Gear is part of
the Process Industries segment and provides aftermarket gear box repair services and gear-drive systems for the industrial, energy
and military marine market sectors. In 2013, the acquisitions of Wazee, Smith Services and Standard Machine were grouped with
Philadelphia Gear to comprise the Process Services reporting unit. The Company still reviews goodwill for impairment at the
segment level for the Mobile Industries and Steel segments.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 41
41
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-8, “Intangibles–Goodwill and Other (Topic
350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment,” which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if goodwill might be
impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Based on a review of various qualitative
factors, management concluded that the goodwill for the Mobile Industries segment and Process Industries segment, excluding
the Process Services reporting unit, was not impaired and that the two-step approach was not required to be performed for these
reporting units. Based on a review of various qualitative factors, management concluded that the goodwill for the Steel segment,
the Process Services reporting unit and the reporting units within the Aerospace segment, would be tested under the two-step
approach. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit,
using an income approach (a discounted cash flow model), as well as a market approach, with its carrying value.
The income approach requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT margins and capital expenditures. The
Company’s reporting units each provide their forecast of results for the next three years. These forecasts are the basis for the
information used in the discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model also requires the use of a discount rate and
a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units),
as well as projections of future operating margins (for the period beyond the forecasted three years). During the fourth quarter
of 2013, the Company used a discount rate for its reporting units of 10% to 13% and a terminal revenue growth rate of 2% to 5%.
The market approach requires several assumptions including EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization) multiples for comparable companies that operate in the same markets as the Company’s reporting units. During
the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company used EBITDA multiples of 6.0 to 9.0 for its reporting units.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $358.7 million of goodwill on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which $162.4 million was
attributable to the Aerospace segment and $161.4 million was attributable to the Process Industries segment. See Note 7 - Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the carrying amount of goodwill by segment.
The fair value of the Aerospace segment’s three reporting units was $203.6 million, $121.2 million and $272.0 million, respectively,
compared to their carrying value of $154.4 million, $99.2 million and $187.0 million, respectively. The fair value of the Process
Industries reporting unit was $301.2 million compared to its carrying value of $270.6 million. The fair value of the Steel segment
exceeded its carrying value by a significant amount. As a result, the Company did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges
for the year ended December 31, 2013.
A 210 basis point increase in the discount rate would have resulted in one of the Aerospace segment’s reporting units failing step
one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would have required the completion of step two of the goodwill impairment
analysis to arrive at a potential goodwill impairment loss. A 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would have resulted in the
Process Services reporting unit failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis. The projected cash flows could have declined
by as much as 23.6% for one of the Aerospace segment’s reporting units and the fair value would have still exceeded its carrying
value. The projected cash flows could have declined by as much as 13% for the Process Services reporting unit and the fair value
would have still exceeded its carrying value.
In 2013, the income approach for the Process Services reporting unit and the reporting units within the Aerospace segment was
weighted by 70% and the market approach was weighted by 30% in arriving at fair value. The 70/30 weighting was selected to
give consideration for the fact that the metrics for the last twelve months for the Process Services reporting unit and the reporting
units within the Aerospace segment were not reflective of expected performance and the discounted-cash flow model provided
a more normalized view of future operating conditions for the Process Services reporting unit and the reporting units within the
Aerospace segment. Had the Company used a 50/50 weighting, the Company would still have passed step one of the goodwill
impairment test for the Process Services reporting unit and the reporting units within the Aerospace segment for the year ended
December 31, 2013.
RESTRUCTURING COSTS:
The Company’s policy is to recognize restructuring costs in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 420,
“Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,” and ASC Topic 712, “Compensation and Non-retirement Post-Employment Benefits.” Detailed
contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management
determines that there is a change in estimate, the accruals are adjusted to reflect this change.
42
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 42
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS INCOME TAXES:
The Company, which is subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous non-U.S. jurisdictions, accounts for income taxes
in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases, as well as net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The Company records valuation allowances against deferred tax assets by tax jurisdiction when it is more likely than not that such
assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the historical and projected financial performance of
the entity recording the net deferred tax asset is considered along with any other pertinent information. Deferred tax assets relate
primarily to pension and postretirement benefit obligations in the United States, which the Company believes are more likely than
not to result in future tax benefits.
In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate income
tax determination is uncertain. The Company is regularly under audit by tax authorities. Accruals for uncertain tax positions
are provided for in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 740. The Company records interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities,
valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, and accruals for uncertain tax positions.
BENEFIT PLANS:
The Company sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans that cover eligible associates. The Company also sponsors
several funded and unfunded postretirement plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees and
their dependents. These plans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 715-30, “Defined Benefit Plans – Pension,” and ASC
Topic 715-60, “Defined Benefit Plans – Other Postretirement.”
The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on management’s assumptions related to future events, including
discount rates, rates of return on pension plan assets, rates of compensation increases and health care cost trend rates.
Management regularly evaluates these assumptions and adjusts them as required and appropriate. Other plan assumptions
are also reviewed on a regular basis to reflect recent experience and the Company’s future expectations. Actual experience that
differs from these assumptions may affect future liquidity, expense and the overall financial position of the Company. While the
Company believes that current assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in actual experience or significant changes
in these assumptions may materially affect the Company’s pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations and
its future expense and cash flow.
The discount rate is used to calculate the present value of expected future pension and postretirement cash flows as of the
measurement date. The Company establishes the discount rate by constructing a notional portfolio of high-quality corporate
bonds and matching the coupon payments and bond maturities to projected benefit payments under the Company’s pension
and postretirement welfare plans. The bonds included in the portfolio are generally non-callable. A lower discount rate will result
in a higher benefit obligation; conversely, a higher discount rate will result in a lower benefit obligation. The discount rate is also
used to calculate the annual interest cost, which is a component of net periodic benefit cost.
The expected rate of return on plan assets is determined by analyzing the historical long-term performance of the Company’s
pension plan assets, as well as the mix of plan assets between equities, fixed income securities and other investments, the expected
long-term rate of return expected for those asset classes and long-term inflation rates. Short-term asset performance can differ
significantly from the expected rate of return, especially in volatile markets. A lower-than-expected rate of return on pension plan
assets will increase pension expense and future contributions.
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS:
The Company recognized net periodic benefit cost of $69.7 million in 2013 for defined benefit pension plans, compared to
$68.9 million in 2012. The slight increase in expense was primarily due to higher amortization of net actuarial losses, partially
offset by lower interest cost and higher expected return from plan assets. Amortization of net actuarial losses was $116.8 million
in 2013, compared to $83.3 million in 2012. The higher amortization of net actuarial losses was primarily due to a 100 basis point
reduction in the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit pension obligation from 5.00% at December 31, 2011 to
4.0% at December 31, 2012. In addition, the increase in 2013 amortization of actuarial losses was due to the migration of deferred
asset losses from 2008 and 2011 into unrecognized losses subject to amortization. Net actuarial losses are amortized over the
average remaining service period of participants in the defined benefit pension plans.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 43
43
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Interest cost for 2013 was $134.7 million compared to $151.1 million for 2012. The higher expected return from plan assets for 2013
of $232.0 million, compared to $221.1 million for 2012, was due to a higher fair value from pension assets at December 31, 2012,
as a result of favorable asset returns, partially offset by the impact of a 25 basis point reduction in the expected return on pension
plan assets.
The Company also incurred pension settlement costs of $7.2 million in 2013 primarily related to the closure of the manufacturing
facility in St. Thomas. In 2012, the Company incurred pension curtailment costs of $11.6 million primarily related to the closure of
the manufacturing facility in St. Thomas. See Note 10 – Impairment and Restructuring Charges for a discussion of the closure of
St. Thomas.
In 2014, the Company expects net periodic benefit cost to decrease to approximately $39 million for defined benefit pension plans.
The expected decrease is primarily due to lower amortization of net actuarial losses, partially offset by a lower expected return
from plan assets and higher interest cost. Amortization of net actuarial losses is expected to decrease approximately $46 million
in 2014 compared to 2013. The majority of the decrease in the expected 2014 amortization of actuarial losses is attributable to
a 102 basis point increase in the Company’s discount rate used to measure its defined benefit pension obligation from 4.00% at
December 31, 2012 to 5.02% at December 31, 2013. The weighted-average amortization period for the Company’s global defined
pension plans is approximately 11 years.
The lower expected return from plan assets for 2014 is primarily due to the impact of a 75 basis point reduction in the expected
return on pension assets for 2014, partially offset by a higher fair value on pension assets at December 31, 2013. The decrease
in the expected rate of return is due to the Company’s move to a higher level of debt securities offset by a lower level of equity
securities to maintain its overfunded status on U.S. pension plans. The higher interest cost is primarily due to a 102 basis point
increase in the Company’s discount rate used for expense purposes from 4.00% for 2013 to 5.02% for 2014. The Company expects
to contribute approximately $20 million to its defined benefit pension plans in 2014 compared to $120.7 million in 2013.
During the period between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2013, the Company recognized net actuarial losses totaling
$893.1 million for defined benefit pension plans. These actuarial losses primarily occurred in 2008, 2011 and 2012, offset by gains
in 2009, 2010 and 2013. In 2008, the net actuarial loss of $743.5 million for defined benefit pension plans was primarily due to the
global financial crisis, which led to broad declines in pension investment returns (a net asset loss of $564.2 million on actual assets
in 2008, or negative 22% on pension plan assets of $2.5 billion, compared to an expected return of $200.9 million, or 8.75%, in
2008). The remaining portion of the net actuarial loss for 2008 was due to other changes in actuarial assumptions.
In 2011, the net actuarial loss of $404.6 million was primarily due to a 75 basis point reduction in the Company’s discount rate used
to measure its defined benefit pension obligation. The change in the discount rate accounted for $234.1 million of the net actuarial
loss. The remaining portion of the net actuarial loss for 2011 was due to lower than expected asset returns of $100.4 million and
other changes in actuarial assumptions of $70.1 million. In 2012, the net actuarial loss of $263.1 million was primarily due to a
100 basis point reduction in the Company’s discount rate used to measure its defined benefit pension obligation. The change in
the discount rate accounted for approximately $370 million of the net actuarial gain. Net actuarial losses as a result of the discount
rate were partially offset by higher than expected asset returns of approximately $140 million (a net asset gain of $361.7 million on
actual assets in 2012, or positive 13.8% on pension plan assets of $3.1 billion, compared to an expected return of $221.1 million,
or 8.25%, in 2012). The remaining portion of the net actuarial loss for 2012 was due to other changes in actuarial assumptions.
In 2013, the net actuarial gain of $376.3 million was primarily due to a 102 basis point increase in the Company’s discount rate used
to measure its defined benefit pension obligation. The change in the discount rate accounted for approximately $320 million of the
net actuarial gain. In addition to the change in the discount rate, higher than expected asset returns of approximately $100 million
(a net asset gain of $334.0 million on actual assets in 2013, or positive 10.8% on pension plan assets of $3.3 billion, compared
to an expected return of $232.0 million, or 8.0%, in 2013). The remaining portion of the net actuarial gain for 2013 was due to
other changes in actuarial assumptions. The impact of these net actuarial losses for defined benefit pension plans, as well as net
actuarial losses related to postretirement benefit plans and net prior service costs for defined benefit pension and postretirement
plans, has decreased total equity by $190.0 million after tax for the period between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2013.
44
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 44
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table below presents a reconciliation of the cumulative net actuarial losses at December 31, 2007 and the cumulative
net actuarial losses at December 31, 2013:
Net actuarial losses at December 31, 2007
$ 500.1
Plus/minus actuarial gains and losses recognized:
Net actuarial losses recognized in 2008
Net actuarial gains recognized in 2009
Net actuarial gains recognized in 2010
Net actuarial losses recognized in 2011
Net actuarial losses recognized in 2012
Net actuarial gains recognized in 2013
Minus amortization of net actuarial losses:
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2008
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2009
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2010
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2011
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2012
Amortization of net actuarial losses in 2013
Curtailment loss recognized in 2012
Settlement loss recognized in 2013
Foreign Currency Impact
Net actuarial losses at December 31, 2013
$ 743.5
(90.7 )
(51.1 )
404.6
263.1
(376.3 )
$ (29.6 )
(35.8 )
(51.9 )
(56.0 )
(83.3 )
(116.8 )
893.1
(373.4 )
(9.5 )
(7.2 )
(14.0 )
$ 989.1
During this same time period, the Company contributed a total of $1,052.3 million to its global defined benefit pension plans, of
which approximately $955.7 million was discretionary. As discussed above, the Company expects to contribute approximately
$20 million to its global defined benefit pension plans in 2014. Despite the net actuarial losses recorded for the period between
December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2013, only approximately $20 million of contributions are required in 2014. The effect of
actuarial losses on future earnings and operating cash flow, as well as the impact from the higher interest rate to measure the
Company’s pension obligations is expected to be favorable in 2014, compared to 2013.
For expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied a discount rate of 4.00% for the defined benefit pension plans. For expense
purposes for 2014, the Company has applied a discount rate of 5.02% for the defined benefit pension plans. For expense purposes
in 2013, the Company applied an expected rate of return of 8.00% for the Company’s pension plan assets. For expense purposes
for 2014, the Company has applied an expected rate of return of 7.25% for the Company’s pension plan assets.
The following table presents the sensitivity of the Company’s U.S. projected pension benefit obligation (PBO), total equity and
2014 expense to the indicated increase/decrease in key assumptions:
Assumption:
Discount rate
Actual return on plan assets
Expected return on assets
+/– Change at December 31, 2014
Change
PBO
Equity
2014
Expense
+/– 0.25%
+/– 0.25%
+/– 0.25%
$ 74.3
N/A
N/A
$ 74.3
6.7
N/A
$ 5.3
0.2
6.6
In the table above, a 25 basis point decrease in the discount rate will increase the PBO by $74.3 million and decrease total equity
by $74.3 million. The change in equity in the table above is reflected on a pre-tax basis. Defined benefit pension plans in the
United States represent 84% of the Company’s benefit obligation and 87% of the fair value of the Company’s plan assets at
December 31, 2013. The Company uses a combined U.S. federal and state statutory rate of approximately 37% to calculate the
after tax impact on equity for U.S. plans. The Company uses the local statutory tax rate in effect to calculate the after tax impact on
equity for all remaining non-U.S. plans. For some non-U.S. plans, a valuation allowance has been recorded against the tax benefits
recorded in equity and, therefore, no tax benefits are recognized on an after tax basis.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 45
45
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS:
The Company recognized net periodic benefit cost of $15.6 million in 2013 for postretirement benefit plans, compared to
$22.6 million in 2012. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest cost. Interest cost was $21.7 million in 2013 for postretirement
benefit plans, compared to $28.4 million in 2012, primarily due to a 105 basis point reduction in the Company’s discount rate for
expense purposes from 4.85% for 2012 to 3.80% for 2013.
In 2014, the Company expects net periodic benefit cost to increase slightly to approximately $17 million for postretirement
benefit plans. The expected increase is primarily due to higher interest cost of approximately $2 million and higher amortization
of prior service costs of $2 million, partially offset by lower amortization of actuarial losses of approximately $2 million. The higher
expected interest cost for 2014 is primarily due to a 79 basis point increase in the Company’s discount rate for expense purposes
from 3.80% for 2013 to 4.59% for 2014. The majority of the decrease in the expected 2014 amortization of actuarial losses is
attributable to a 79 basis point increase in the Company’s discount rate used to measure its postretirement obligation from 3.80%
at December 31, 2012 to 4.59% at December 31, 2013.
For expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied a discount rate of 3.80% for the postretirement welfare plans. For expense
purposes for 2014, the Company has applied a discount rate of 4.59% for the postretirement welfare plans. For expense purposes
in 2013 and 2014, the Company applied an expected rate of return of 5.0% to the Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association
(VEBA) trust assets.
The following table presents the sensitivity of the Company’s accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation (ABO), total
equity and 2014 expense to the indicated increase/decrease in key assumptions:
Assumption:
Discount rate
Actual return on plan assets
Expected return on assets
+/– Change at December 31, 2014
Change
ABO
Equity
2014
Expense
+/– 0.25%
+/– 0.25%
+/– 0.25%
$ 13.0
N/A
N/A
$ 13.0
0.6
N/A
$ 0.5
—
0.6
In the table above, a 25 basis point decrease in the discount rate will increase the ABO by $13.0 million and decrease equity by
$13.0 million. The change in total equity in the table above is reflected on a pre-tax basis.
For measurement purposes for postretirement benefits, the Company assumed a weighted-average annual rate of increase in
per capita cost (health care cost trend rate) for medical and prescription drug benefits of 7.25% for 2014, declining steadily for
the next nine years to 5.0%; and 9.25% for HMO benefits for 2014, declining gradually for the next 17 years to 5.0%. The assumed
health care cost trend rate may have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase in the assumed
health care cost trend rate would have increased the 2013 total service and interest cost components by $0.5 million and would
have increased the postretirement obligation by $10.4 million. A one percentage point decrease would provide corresponding
reductions of $0.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively.
OTHER LOSS RESERVES:
The Company has a number of loss exposures that are incurred in the ordinary course of business such as environmental claims,
product liability, product warranty, litigation and accounts receivable reserves. Establishing loss reserves for these matters requires
management’s estimate and judgment with regards to risk exposure and ultimate liability or realization. These loss reserves are
reviewed periodically and adjustments are made to reflect the most recent facts and circumstances.
46
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 46
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OTHER DISCLOSURES:
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
The Company has been making strategic investments in business and production processes. The Company is in the midst of
several multi-year projects in the Steel segment, including a new vertical continuous caster, an intermediate steel tube finishing
line and an in-line forge press to produce new large-diameter sound-center bars. Additionally, the Company is constructing a
new building to bring together personnel from the Company’s Bearing and Power Transmission headquarters and corporate
headquarters with personnel from the Company’s technology center in North Canton, Ohio.
The caster, which will provide large bar capabilities unique in the United States, is expected to cost approximately $200 million.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had incurred costs of $140.5 million, including capitalized interest, related to this project.
During 2013, the Company incurred approximately $110 million related to this project. The caster is expected to begin production
in the second half of 2014. The steel tube finishing line project is expected to cost approximately $50 million. As of December
31, 2013, the Company had incurred $47 million related to this project. The in-line forge press is expected to cost approximately
$32 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had incurred virtually all of the costs related to this project. These investments
reinforce the Company’s position of offering the broadest special bar quality steel capabilities in North America.
The construction of the new building began in April 2012 to accommodate a combined team of approximately 1,200 employees,
from research and development, engineering, customer service, sales and marketing and corporate functions. The Company
foresees increased collaboration among employees at the new North Canton campus, thereby increasing the speed of innovation
and levels of customer service when the project is expected to be mostly completed in early 2014. The total cost of the project is
expected to be approximately $65 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had incurred $50 million related to this project.
FOREIGN CURRENCY:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date; income and expenses
are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the reporting period. Related translation adjustments are
reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from
transactions are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company recognized a foreign currency exchange loss of $9.2 million, $6.9 million and $1.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a negative
non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $11.5 million that decreased shareholders’ equity, compared to a positive
non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $10.5 million that increased shareholders’ equity for the year ended
December 31, 2012. The foreign currency translation adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2013 were negatively impacted
by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies such as the Australian dollar, the Indian rupee, the South African
rand, the Canadian dollar and the Brazilian real.
TRADE LAW ENFORCEMENT:
The U.S. government has an antidumping duty order in effect covering tapered roller bearings from China. The Company is a
producer of these bearings, as well as ball bearings and other bearing types, in the United States. In 2012, the U.S. government
extended this order for an additional five years. Antidumping duty orders covering ball bearings from Japan and the United
Kingdom were sunset by a court order in July 2011, retroactive to July 2005. That court decision, however, was appealed by the
U.S. International Trade Commission and the Company, and was reversed by the federal Court of Appeals in May 2013, reinstating
these ball bearing orders retroactive to July 2005. These ball bearing orders are now under periodic U.S. government review to
determine whether either or both antidumping duty orders are still necessary, and these are expected to sunset.
QUARTERLY DIVIDEND:
On February 14, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per common share.
The quarterly dividend will be paid on March 7, 2014 to shareholders of record as of February 24, 2014. This will be the
367th consecutive dividend paid on the common shares of the Company.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 47
47
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
Certain statements set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders
(including the Company’s forecasts, beliefs and expectations) that are not historical in nature are “forward-looking” statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, Management’s Discussion and Analysis on
pages 20 through 47 contains numerous forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally will be accompanied
by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “intend,” “may,” “possible,” “potential,”
“predict,” “project” or other similar words, phrases or expressions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-
looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company cautions readers that
actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the
Company due to a variety of factors, such as:
a) deterioration in world economic conditions, or in economic conditions in any of the geographic regions in which the
Company conducts business, including additional adverse effects from the global economic slowdown, terrorism
or hostilities. This includes: political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in
countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency valuations;
b) the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the industries in which the Company
operates. This includes: the ability of the Company to respond to rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of
customer bankruptcies or liquidations, the impact of changes in industrial business cycles, and whether conditions of fair
trade continue in the U.S. markets;
c) competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by existing or new foreign and
domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing and new competitors, and new technology that may
impact the way the Company’s products are sold or distributed;
d) changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Company’s manufacturing processes; changes in
costs associated with varying levels of operations and manufacturing capacity; availability of raw materials and energy;
the Company’s ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and the operation of the
Company’s surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated with product warranty claims; changes
resulting from inventory management and cost reduction initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects
of unplanned work stoppages; and changes in the cost of labor and benefits;
e)
the success of the Company’s operating plans, announced programs, initiatives and capital investments; the ability
to integrate acquired companies; the ability of acquired companies to achieve satisfactory operating results, including
results being accretive to earnings; and the Company’s ability to maintain appropriate relations with unions that represent
Company associates in certain locations in order to avoid disruptions of business;
f ) unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes: claims or problems related to intellectual property, product
liability or warranty, environmental issues, and taxes;
g) changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest rates, which affect: the Company’s
cost of funds and/or ability to raise capital; the Company’s pension obligations and investment performance; and/or
customer demand and the ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Company’s products or equipment that
contain the Company’s products;
h)
retention of CDSOA distributions;
i)
the taxable nature of the previously announced plan to pursue a spinoff of the Company’s steel business and the Company’s
ability to successfully complete such spinoff; and
j)
those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors on pages 7 through 14.
Additional risks relating to the Company’s business, the industries in which the Company operates or the Company’s common
shares may be described from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All of these
risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond the
Company’s control.
Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect
future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Except as required by the federal securities
laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
48
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 48
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK:
Changes in short-term interest rates related to several separate funding sources impact the Company’s earnings. These sources
are borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement, borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility, floating rate tax-exempt
U.S. municipal bonds with a weekly reset and short-term bank borrowings by its international subsidiaries. If the market rates for
short-term borrowings increased by one-percentage-point around the globe, the impact would be an increase in interest expense
of $0.3 million annually, with a corresponding decrease in income from continuing operations before income taxes of the same
amount. This amount was determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the Company’s borrowing cost,
year-end debt balances by category and an estimated impact on the tax-exempt municipal bonds’ interest rates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK:
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies, including the Euro, also impact the Company’s earnings.
The greatest risk relates to products shipped between the Company’s European operations and the United States. Foreign currency
forward contracts are used to hedge a portion of these intercompany transactions. Additionally, hedges are used to cover third-
party purchases of product and equipment. As of December 31, 2013, there were $516.7 million of hedges in place. A uniform 10%
weakening of the U.S. dollar against all currencies would have resulted in a charge of $49.0 million related to these hedges, which
would have partially offset the otherwise favorable impact of the underlying currency fluctuation. In addition to the direct impact
of the hedged amounts, changes in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales or foreign currency sales price as competitors’
products become more or less attractive.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK:
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to market risk with respect to commodity price fluctuations, primarily
related to our purchases of raw materials and energy, principally scrap steel, other ferrous and non-ferrous metals, alloys and
natural gas. Whenever possible, the Company manages its exposure to commodity risks primarily through the use of supplier
pricing agreements that enable the Company to establish the purchase prices for certain inputs that are used in our manufacturing
and distribution business. Timken utilizes a raw material surcharge as a component of pricing steel to pass through the cost
increases of scrap steel and other raw materials, as well as natural gas. From time to time, the Company also uses derivative
financial instruments to hedge a portion of its exposure to price risk related to natural gas purchases.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 49
49
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Net sales
Cost of products sold
Gross Profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Impairment and restructuring charges
Separation costs
Operating Income
Interest expense
Interest income
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (expenses) receipts, net
Other income (expense), net
Income Before Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net Income
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Year Ended December 31,
2013
2012
2011
$ 4,341.2
3,249.2
$ 4,987.0
3,620.7
$ 5,170.2
3,800.5
1,092.0
626.6
16.4
13.0
436.0
(24.4 )
1.9
(2.8 )
6.4
417.1
154.1
263.0
0.3
1,366.3
643.9
29.5
—
692.9
(31.1 )
2.9
108.0
(6.7 )
766.0
270.1
495.9
0.4
1,369.7
626.2
14.4
—
729.1
(36.8 )
5.6
(1.1 )
—
696.8
240.2
456.6
2.3
Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company
$ 262.7
$ 495.5
$ 454.3
Net Income per Common Share Attributable to
The Timken Company Common Shareholders
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends per share
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
$ 2.76
$ 2.74
$ 0.92
$ 5.11
$ 5.07
$ 0.92
$ 4.65
$ 4.59
$ 0.78
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in millions)
Net Income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Comprehensive Income, net of tax
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Year Ended December 31,
2013
2012
2011
$ 263.0
$ 495.9
$ 456.6
(19.0 )
—
398.3
0.3
379.6
642.6
(7.2 )
10.5
(0.8 )
(133.2 )
(0.4 )
(123.9 )
372.0
0.2
(48.5 )
0.7
(218.1 )
1.3
(264.6 )
192.0
2.5
Comprehensive Income Attributable to The Timken Company
$ 649.8
$ 371.8
$ 189.5
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
50
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 50
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in millions)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable, less allowances (2013 – $10.3 million; 2012 – $12.1 million)
Inventories, net
Deferred income taxes
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
Other current assets
Total Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Other Assets
Goodwill
Non-current pension assets
Other intangible assets
Deferred income taxes
Other non-current assets
Total Other Assets
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt
Accounts payable, trade
Salaries, wages and benefits
Income taxes payable
Deferred income taxes
Other current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt
Total Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt
Accrued pension cost
Accrued postretirement benefits cost
Deferred income taxes
Other non-current liabilities
Total Non-Current Liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value:
Authorized – 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued
Common stock without par value:
Authorized – 200,000,000 shares
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2013 – 98,375,135; 2012 – 98,375,135 shares)
Stated capital
Other paid-in capital
Earnings invested in the business
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Treasury shares at cost (2013 – 5,252,441; 2012 – 2,476,921 shares)
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Noncontrolling interest
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
December 31,
2013
2012
$ 384.6
15.1
566.7
809.9
69.8
27.6
63.8
1,937.5
1,558.1
358.7
342.6
219.1
10.1
51.8
982.3
$ 586.4
15.1
546.7
862.1
86.5
12.6
52.6
2,162.0
1,405.3
338.9
0.2
224.7
74.1
39.0
676.9
$ 4,477.9
$ 4,244.2
$ 18.6
222.5
183.1
107.1
7.6
190.5
250.7
980.1
206.6
179.0
233.9
166.9
62.8
849.2
$ 14.3
216.2
213.9
33.5
2.8
177.5
9.6
667.8
455.1
391.4
371.8
4.5
107.0
1,329.8
—
—
53.1
896.4
2,586.4
(626.1 )
(273.2 )
2,636.6
12.0
2,648.6
53.1
891.4
2,411.2
(1,013.2 )
(110.3 )
2,232.2
14.4
2,246.6
$ 4,477.9
$ 4,244.2
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 51
51
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in millions)
CASH PROVIDED (USED)
Operating Activities
Net income attributable to The Timken Company
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment charges
Loss on sale of assets
Deferred income tax provision
Stock-based compensation expense
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
Pension and other postretirement expense
Pension and other postretirement benefit contributions and payments
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Accounts payable, trade
Other accrued expenses
Income taxes
Other, net
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $0.4 million in 2013
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
Divestitures, net of cash divested of $0.9 million in 2012
Investments in short-term marketable securities, net
Other
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities
Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
Purchase of treasury shares
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Deferred financing costs
Payments on long-term debt
Short-term debt activity, net
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
Other
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(Decrease) Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Year Ended December 31,
2013
2012
2011
$ 262.7
0.3
$ 495.5
0.4
$ 454.3
2.3
194.6
0.7
1.9
0.5
18.6
(10.9 )
85.3
(158.0 )
(13.4 )
62.5
3.5
(38.5 )
34.3
(14.1 )
430.0
(325.8 )
(64.2 )
7.3
—
5.5
1.2
(376.0 )
(87.5 )
(189.2 )
13.1
10.9
1.9
—
(9.9 )
4.8
—
6.6
(249.3 )
(6.5 )
(201.8 )
586.4
198.0
6.6
5.8
123.1
18.0
(9.9 )
91.5
(412.7 )
103.0
102.5
(73.2 )
(54.0 )
21.7
7.8
624.1
(297.2 )
(20.7 )
2.0
1.2
14.3
2.7
(297.7 )
(89.0 )
(112.3 )
13.8
9.9
—
—
(26.9 )
(7.7 )
3.6
—
(208.6 )
3.8
121.6
464.8
192.5
3.3
0.6
124.5
16.9
(9.5 )
74.9
(456.0 )
(111.6 )
(125.6 )
14.9
29.1
9.2
(10.4 )
209.4
(205.3 )
(292.1 )
5.7
4.8
(22.7 )
1.6
(508.0 )
(76.0 )
(43.8 )
16.6
9.5
9.5
(3.0 )
(8.9 )
1.0
(3.6 )
(5.6 )
(104.3 )
(9.4 )
(412.3 )
877.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
$ 384.6
$ 586.4
$ 464.8
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 52
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
The Timken Company Shareholders
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Balance at January 1, 2011
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
(net of income tax of $130.1 million)
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications
Change in ownership of noncontrolling interest
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest
Dividends – $0.78 per share
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock purchased at cost
Stock option exercise activity
Restricted shares (issued) surrendered
Shares surrendered for taxes
Total
Stated
Capital
Other
Paid-In
Capital
Earnings
Invested
Accumulated
Other
in the Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Business
Non-
Treasury controlling
Interest
Stock
$ 1,941.8
456.6
(48.5 )
(218.1 )
0.7
1.3
(0.5 )
(5.1 )
(76.0 )
9.5
16.9
(43.8 )
16.6
(0.3 )
(8.6 )
$ 53.1 $ 881.7
$ 1,626.4 $ (624.7 ) $ (11.5 )
454.3
(48.5 )
(218.2 )
0.6
1.3
(43.8 )
34.1
0.6
(8.6 )
(76.0 )
(0.5 )
9.5
16.9
(17.5 )
(0.9 )
$ 16.8
2.3
0.1
0.1
(5.1 )
Balance at December 31, 2011
$ 2,042.5
$ 53.1 $ 889.2
$ 2,004.7 $ (889.5 ) $ (29.2 )
$ 14.2
Year Ended December 31, 2012
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
(net of income tax of $55.3 million)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications
Dividends – $0.92 per share
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock purchased at cost
Stock option exercise activity
Restricted shares (issued) surrendered
Shares surrendered for taxes
495.9
10.5
(133.2 )
(0.8 )
(0.4 )
(89.0 )
9.9
18.0
(112.3 )
13.4
0.2
(8.1 )
495.5
(89.0 )
10.5
(133.2 )
(0.6 )
(0.4 )
0.4
(0.2 )
9.9
18.0
(21.9 )
(3.8 )
(112.3 )
35.3
4.0
(8.1 )
Balance at December 31, 2012
$ 2,246.6
$ 53.1 $ 891.4
$ 2,411.2 $ (1,013.2 ) $ (110.3 )
$ 14.4
Year Ended December 31, 2013
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment
(net of income tax of $226.5 million)
Change in fair value of derivative financial
instruments, net of reclassifications
Change in ownership of noncontrolling interest
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest
Dividends – $0.92 per share
Excess tax benefit from stock compensation
Stock-based compensation expense
Stock purchased at cost
Stock option exercise activity
Restricted shares (issued) surrendered
Shares surrendered for taxes
263.0
(19.0 )
398.3
0.3
8.9
(2.8 )
(87.5 )
10.9
18.6
(189.2 )
7.8
1.0
(8.3 )
(11.5 )
398.3
0.3
262.7
(87.5 )
0.3
(7.5 )
7.6
(2.8 )
(189.2 )
29.8
4.8
(8.3 )
1.3
10.9
18.6
(22.0 )
(3.8 )
Balance at December 31, 2013
$ 2,648.6
$ 53.1 $ 896.4
$ 2,586.4 $ (626.1 ) $ (273.2 )
$ 12.0
See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 53
53
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company in which a controlling interest is
maintained. Investments in affiliated companies that the Company does not control, and the activities of which it is not the primary
beneficiary, are accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated
upon consolidation.
REVENUE RECOGNITION:
The Company recognizes revenue when title passes to the customer. This occurs at the shipping point except for goods sold by
certain foreign entities and certain exported goods, where title passes when the goods reach their destination. Selling prices are
fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in net
sales and the related costs are included in cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company acquired the assets of Philadelphia Gear in July 2011. Philadelphia Gear recognizes a portion of its revenues on the
percentage of completion method measured on the cost-to-cost basis. In 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized approximately
$45 million and $60 million, respectively, in net sales under the percentage of completion method.
CASH EQUIVALENTS:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash
equivalents.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, which represents an estimate of the losses expected from the accounts
receivable portfolio, to reduce accounts receivable to their net realizable value. The allowance was based upon historical trends
in collections and write-offs, management’s judgment of the probability of collecting accounts and management’s evaluation of
business risk. The Company extends credit to customers satisfying pre-defined credit criteria. The Company believes it has limited
concentration of credit risk due to the diversity of its customer base.
INVENTORIES:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The majority of domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and the
balance of the Company’s inventories is valued by the FIFO method.
INVESTMENTS:
Short-term investments are investments with maturities between four months and one year and are valued at amortized cost,
which approximates fair value. The Company held short-term investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 with a fair value
and cost basis of $13.9 million and $17.3 million, respectively, which were included in other current assets on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Property, plant and equipment, net is valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. The provision for depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated
useful lives of the assets. The useful lives are approximately 30 years for buildings, three to ten years for computer software and
three to 20 years for machinery and equipment.
The impairment of long-lived assets is evaluated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount
of the asset or related group of assets may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized at that time to reduce the asset to the lower of its fair value or its
net book value.
54
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 54
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line method over their legal or estimated useful lives, with
useful lives ranging from one to 20 years. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for
impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test as of October first, after the annual forecasting
process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable in accordance with accounting rules related
to goodwill and other intangible assets.
Effective October 1, 2011, the Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-08, “Intangibles–
Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment,” which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to
determine if goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Effective
October 1, 2012, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles–Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if indefinite-
lived intangibles might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step impairment test.
PRODUCT WARRANTIES:
The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues liabilities for warranties based
upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim experience in accordance with accounting rules relating to
contingent liabilities. The Company records and accounts for its warranty reserve based on specific claim incidents. Should the
Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably estimable, a specific
charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical
experience change.
INCOME TAXES:
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740, “Income Taxes.”
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as net operating loss and
tax credit carryforwards. The Company recognizes valuation allowances against deferred tax assets by tax jurisdiction when it
is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance
with ASC 740-10. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income
tax expense.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION:
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, other than those located in highly inflationary countries, are translated at the rate of exchange
in effect on the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the
year. The related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions and the translation of financial statements of subsidiaries in highly
inflationary countries are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company realized foreign currency exchange
losses of $9.2 million, $6.9 million and $1.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS:
The Company recognizes an overfunded status or underfunded status (i.e., the difference between the fair value of plan assets
and the benefit obligations) as either an asset or a liability for its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. The
adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss represents the current year net unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and
unrecognized prior service costs. These amounts will be recognized in future periods as net periodic benefit cost.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 55
55
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the stock-based awards
over their required vesting period. Stock options are issued with an exercise price equal to the opening market price of Timken
common shares on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model,
which incorporates assumptions regarding the expected volatility, the expected option life, the risk-free interest rate and the
expected dividend yield. The fair value of stock-based awards that will settle in Timken common shares, other than stock options,
is based on the opening market price of Timken common shares on the grant date. The fair value of stock-based awards that will
settle in cash are remeasured at each reporting period until settlement of the awards.
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Unvested restricted shares provide for the payment of nonforfeitable dividends. The Company considers these awards as
participating securities. Earnings per share are computed using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share are computed
by dividing net income less undistributed earnings allocated to unvested restricted shares by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income less undistributed
earnings allocated to unvested restricted shares by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for
the dilutive impact of outstanding stock-based awards.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:
The Company recognizes all derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as
hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is designated and qualifies as a hedge, depending on the
nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets,
liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive loss until the hedged item is recognized
in earnings. The Company’s holdings of forward foreign currency exchange contracts qualify as derivatives pursuant to the criteria
established in derivative accounting guidance, and the Company has designated certain of those derivatives as hedges.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” effective for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The new accounting rules require all U.S. public companies to report the
effect of items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items of net income, net of tax,
either on the face of the financial statements where net income is presented or in a tabular format in the notes to the financial
statements. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted ASU No. 2013-02. The new accounting rules expand the disclosure
of other comprehensive income and had no impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 4 –
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for additional information on the new disclosure.
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net
Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 clarifies guidance and eliminates
diversity in practice on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss,
or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. The new accounting rules are effective for annual and interim reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2013-11, if any, on
the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
USE OF ESTIMATES:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These
estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect recent experience.
RECLASSIFICATIONS:
Certain amounts reported in the 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to correct an immaterial error.
The Company reclassified $15.1 million from other current assets to restricted cash. In addition, the Company reclassified
approximately $12 million from current deferred tax assets to non-current deferred tax assets.
56
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 56
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
ACQUISITIONS:
On May 13, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Standard Machine, which provides new gearboxes, gearbox service
and repair, open gearing, large gear fabrication, machining and field technical services to end users in Canada and the western
United States, for approximately $37.0 million in cash, including cash acquired of approximately $0.1 million that was subject to a
post-closing indebtedness adjustment. Based in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Standard Machine employs 125 people and
serves a wide variety of industrial sectors including mining, oil and gas, and pulp and paper. The results of operations of Standard
Machine were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the period subsequent to the effective date of
the acquisition and are reported in the Process Industries segment.
On April 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Smith Services, an electric motor
repair specialist, for approximately $13.2 million. Based in Princeton, West Virginia, Smith Services employs approximately
140 people. The results of operations of Smith Services were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for
the period subsequent to the effective date of the acquisition and are reported in the Process Industries segment.
On March 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Interlube, which makes and markets automated lubrication
delivery systems and related components to end market sectors including commercial vehicles, construction, mining, and heavy
and general industries, for approximately $14.5 million, including cash acquired of approximately $0.3 million, that was subject
to a post-closing indebtedness adjustment. Based in Plymouth, United Kingdom, Interlube employs about 90 people. The results
of operations of Interlube were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the period subsequent to the
effective date of the acquisition and are reported in the Mobile Industries segment.
On December 31, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of Wazee, a leading regional provider of motor,
generator, wind turbine and industrial crane services to diverse end-markets including oil and gas, wind, agriculture, material
handling and construction, for approximately $20 million in cash. Based in Denver, Colorado, Wazee employs over 100 people. The
results of operations of Wazee have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income since January 1, 2013
and are reported in the Process Industries segment. In addition to the Wazee acquisition, the Company purchased the remaining
interest in its joint venture in Curitiba, Brazil.
On October 3, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Drives, a leading manufacturer of highly engineered drive-chains,
roller-chains and conveyor augers for agricultural and industrial markets, for approximately $93 million in cash. Based in Fulton,
Illinois, Drives employs approximately 430 people. The results of operations of Drives were included in the Company’s Consolidated
Statements of Income for the period subsequent to the effective date of the acquisition and are reported in the Mobile Industries
and Process Industries segments.
On July 1, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Philadelphia Gear, a leading provider of
high-performance gear drives and components with a strong focus on value-added aftermarket capabilities in the industrial and
military marine sectors, for approximately $199 million in cash. Based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Gear employs
approximately 220 people. The results of operations of Philadelphia Gear were included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements
of Income for the period subsequent to the effective date of the acquisition and are reported in the Process Industries segment.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 57
57
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES Note 2 – Acquisitions and Divestitures (continued)
Pro forma results of these operations have not been presented because the effects of the acquisitions were not significant to the
Company’s income from operations or total assets in 2013, 2012 or 2011. The purchase price allocations, net of cash acquired, and
any subsequent purchase price adjustments for acquisitions in 2013, 2012 and 2011 are presented below:
2013
2012
2011
Assets:
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories, net
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses
Other current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Other non-current assets
Total assets acquired
Liabilities:
Accounts payable, trade
Salaries, wages and benefits
Other current liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
$ 10.6
12.7
0.3
0.1
19.5
18.1
13.0
—
$ 74.3
$ 3.3
1.4
0.9
4.5
$ 10.1
$ 64.2
$ 4.7
2.3
0.1
0.2
3.0
7.1
7.7
—
$ 25.1
$ 2.3
0.3
1.8
—
$ 4.4
$ 20.7
$ 25.6
23.6
0.9
0.1
32.1
83.3
146.9
0.6
$ 313.1
$ 10.7
5.1
5.2
—
$ 21.0
$ 292.1
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation for identifiable intangible assets acquired in 2013:
Trade name
Technology / Know-how
All customer relationships
Non-compete agreements
Total intangible assets
Purchase
Price Allocation
Weighted-
Average Life
13 years
18 years
20 years
4 years
$ 1.1
5.2
6.4
0.3
$ 13.0
The following table summarizes the final purchase price allocation for identifiable intangible assets acquired in 2012:
Trade name
Know how
All customer relationships
Non-compete agreements
Total intangible assets
Initial Purchase
Price Allocation
Adjusted Purchase
Price Allocation
Weighted-
Average Life
8 years
20 years
10 years
5 years
$ 1.2
3.5
2.5
0.5
$ 7.7
$ 0.8
3.4
3.5
—
$ 7.7
Weighted-
Average Life
6 years
20 years
9 years
DIVESTITURES:
On December 31, 2012, the Company completed the sale of its interest in AGC to Machinery Tec Masters Corporation. The Company
received $2.2 million in cash proceeds for AGC. The Company recognized a pretax loss on divestiture of $2.0 million, and the loss
is reflected in other (expense) income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
58
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 58
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 3 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic earnings per share and diluted
earnings per share for the years ended December 31:
Numerator:
Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested stock
Net income available to common shareholders for basic earnings
per share and diluted earnings per share
Denominator:
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding – basic
Effect of dilutive securities:
2013
2012
2011
$ 262.7
(0.3 )
$ 495.5
(1.5 )
$ 454.3
(1.6 )
$ 262.4
$ 494.0
$ 452.7
94,989,561
96,671,613
97,451,064
Stock options and awards – based on the treasury stock method
834,167
930,868
1,204,449
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding, assuming
dilution of stock options and awards
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
95,823,728
97,602,481
98,655,513
$ 2.76
$ 2.74
$ 5.11
$ 5.07
$ 4.65
$ 4.59
The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average market price of the Company’s
common shares. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The
antidilutive stock options outstanding were 382,525, 879,413 and 436,850 during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 59
59
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 4 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following tables present details about components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 respectively:
Foreign
currency postretirement
liability
Change in
Pension and fair value of
derivative
financial
adjustments instruments
translation
adjustments
Total
Balance at December 31, 2012
$ 49.0
$(1,061.5 )
$ (0.7 )
$(1,013.2 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income before
reclassifications, before income tax
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), before income tax
Income tax benefit
Net current period other comprehensive (loss)
income, net of income taxes
Non-controlling interest
Net current period comprehensive (loss) income,
net of income taxes and non-controlling interest
(19.0 )
494.2
—
—
(19.0 )
7.5
130.6
(226.5 )
398.3
—
(11.5 )
398.3
0.7
(0.4 )
—
0.3
—
0.3
475.9
130.2
(226.5 )
379.6
7.5
387.1
Balance at December 31, 2013
$ 37.5
$ (663.2 )
$ (0.4 )
$ (626.1 )
Foreign
Pension and
currency postretirement
fair value of
liability marketable
Change in
Change in fair value of
derivative
financial
securities instruments
adjustments
translation
adjustments
Total
Balance, December 31, 2011
$ 38.5
$ (928.3 )
$ 0.6
$ (0.3 )
$ (889.5 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications, before income tax
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), before income tax
Income tax expense
Net current period other comprehensive (loss)
income, net of income taxes
Non-controlling interest
Net current period comprehensive (loss) income,
net of income taxes and non-controlling interest
—
—
10.5
—
10.5
10.5
(288.9 )
100.4
55.3
(133.2 )
—
—
(1.2 )
0.4
(0.8 )
0.2
0.4
(0.8 )
—
(0.4 )
—
(278.0 )
98.4
55.7
(123.9 )
0.2
(133.2 )
(0.6 )
(0.4 )
(123.7 )
Balance at December 31, 2012
$ 49.0
$(1,061.5 )
$ —
$ (0.7 )
$ (1,013.2 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications and income taxes includes the effect of foreign currency. The
reclassification of the pension and postretirement liability adjustment was included in costs of products sold and selling, general
and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The reclassification of the remaining components of
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income were included in other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statements
of Income.
60
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 60
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES
The components of inventories at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
Manufacturing supplies
Raw materials
Work in process
Finished products
Subtotal
Allowance for surplus and obsolete inventory
Total Inventories, net
2013
$ 59.7
94.5
294.5
381.5
$ 830.2
(20.3 )
$ 809.9
2012
$ 64.3
110.7
278.1
430.4
$ 883.5
(21.4 )
$ 862.1
Inventories valued on the LIFO cost method were 54% and the remaining 46% were valued by the FIFO method. If all inventories
had been valued at FIFO, inventories would have been $278.3 million and $280.6 million greater at December 31, 2013 and 2012,
respectively. The Company recognized a decrease in its LIFO reserve of $2.3 million during 2013 compared to a decrease in its LIFO
reserve of $7.1 million during 2012. The decrease in the LIFO reserve recognized during 2013 was due to lower costs and quantities
of inventory on hand, as well as the mix of inventory.
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The components of property, plant and equipment, net at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment
Subtotal
Less allowances for depreciation
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
2013
$ 685.0
3,393.1
$ 4,078.1
(2,520.0 )
2012
$ 653.8
3,138.3
$ 3,792.1
(2,386.8 )
$ 1,558.1
$ 1,405.3
Total depreciation expense was $175.9 million, $179.0 million and $178.5 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At
December 31, 2013 and 2012, property, plant and equipment, net included $81.1 million and $84.9 million, respectively, of
capitalized software. Depreciation expense for capitalized software was $25.1 million, $23.5 million and $21.7 million in 2013,
2012 and 2011, respectively.
In November 2013, the Company finalized the sale of its former manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo. The Company expects to
receive approximately $34 million over a twenty-four month period, of which $5.9 million was received as of December 31, 2013.
The total costs of this transaction, including the net book value of the real estate and broker’s commissions, were approximately
$3 million. The Company is recognizing the gain on the sale of this facility using the installment method. In the fourth quarter of
2013, the Company recognized a gain of $5.4 million and expects to recognize an additional gain of approximately $25 million in
2014 related to this transaction.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 61
61
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL:
The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its
annual impairment test as of October first after the annual forecasting process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill and indefinite-
lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may not be recoverable.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. Prior to 2012, the Company’s reporting units were
the same as its reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries, Aerospace and Steel. During 2012, management
began reviewing goodwill for impairment at a level below the segment level for the Process Industries and Aerospace segments.
This change was necessitated by a change in management structure, as well as the level of review of financial information by
management within the Aerospace segment, and the acquisition of the assets of Philadelphia Gear. Philadelphia Gear is part of
the Process Industries segment and provides aftermarket gear box repair services and gear-drive systems for the industrial, energy
and military marine market sectors. In 2013, the acquisitions of Wazee, Smith Services and Standard Machine were grouped with
Philadelphia Gear to comprise the Process Services reporting unit. The Company still reviews goodwill for impairment at the
segment level for the Mobile Industries and Steel segments.
During 2011, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2011-8, “Intangibles–Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing
Goodwill for Impairment,” which allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if goodwill might be impaired
and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. Based on a review of various qualitative factors,
management concluded that the goodwill for the Mobile Industries segment and Process Industries segment, excluding the
Process Services reporting unit, was not impaired and that the two-step approach was not required to be performed for these
reporting units. Based on a review of various qualitative factors, management concluded that the goodwill for the Steel segment,
the Process Services reporting unit and the three reporting units within the Aerospace segment, would be tested under the
two-step approach. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the estimated fair value of each
reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow model), as well as a market approach, with its carrying value.
In 2013, 2012 and 2011, no goodwill impairment loss was recorded.
Changes in the carrying value of goodwill were as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2013:
Beginning Balance
Acquisitions
Other
Ending Balance
Mobile
Industries
Process
Industries
$ 17.7
4.3
0.3
$ 22.3
$ 146.4
13.8
1.2
$ 161.4
Aerospace
$ 162.2
—
0.2
$ 162.4
Steel
$ 12.6
—
—
$ 12.6
Total
$ 338.9
18.1
1.7
$ 358.7
Acquisitions in 2013 primarily relate to the purchase price allocation for Interlube completed on March 11, 2013, Smith Services
completed on April 11, 2013 and Standard Machine completed on May 13, 2013. “Other” includes foreign currency translation
adjustments for 2013. The goodwill acquired from Smith Services of $1.7 million is tax-deductible and will be amortized over
15 years. Refer to Note 2 – Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information on the acquisitions listed above.
62
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 62
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
Year ended December 31, 2012:
Beginning Balance
Acquisitions
Other
Ending Balance
Mobile
Industries
Process
Industries
$ 16.9
0.8
—
$ 17.7
$ 141.1
6.3
(1.0 )
$ 146.4
Aerospace
$ 162.1
—
0.1
$ 162.2
Steel
$ 12.6
—
—
$ 12.6
Total
$ 332.7
7.1
(0.9 )
$ 338.9
Acquisitions in 2012 primarily relate to the purchase price allocation of $6.1 million for the Wazee acquisition completed on
December 31, 2012. All of the goodwill acquired in 2012 is tax-deductible and will be amortized over 15 years for tax purposes.
“Other” primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments for 2012.
INTANGIBLES ASSETS:
The following table displays intangible assets as of December 31:
Intangible assets subject to
amortization:
Customer relationships
Know-how
Industrial license agreements
Land-use rights
Patents
Technology use
Trademarks
PMA licenses
Non-compete agreements
Unpatented technology
Intangible assets not subject to
amortization:
Tradename
FAA air agency certificates
Total intangible assets
2013
2012
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Gross
Carrying
Amout
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
$ 167.3
31.4
0.1
8.9
2.3
46.2
4.6
8.8
4.2
7.2
$ 281.0
$ 17.2
14.2
$ 31.4
$ 312.4
$ 51.3
4.4
0.1
4.5
1.8
13.5
2.7
4.0
3.8
7.2
$ 93.3
$ —
—
$ —
$ 93.3
$ 116.0
27.0
—
4.4
0.5
32.7
1.9
4.8
0.4
—
$ 187.7
$ 17.2
14.2
$ 31.4
$ 219.1
$ 159.6
26.1
0.2
8.6
2.5
47.0
4.2
8.8
4.4
7.2
$ 268.6
$ 17.3
14.2
$ 31.5
$ 300.1
$ 38.1
2.8
0.1
4.1
1.8
11.5
3.4
3.6
3.3
6.7
$ 75.4
$ —
—
$ —
$ 75.4
$ 121.5
23.3
0.1
4.5
0.7
35.5
0.8
5.2
1.1
0.5
$ 193.2
$ 17.3
14.2
$ 31.5
$ 224.7
Intangible assets acquired in 2013 were $6.1 million for the Standard Machine acquisition, $0.7 million for the Smith Services
acquisition and $6.2 million for the Interlube acquisition. Intangible assets subject to amortization acquired in 2013 were assigned
useful lives of two to 20 years and had a weighted-average amortization period of 18.4 years. Intangible assets acquired in 2012
were $7.7 million for the Wazee acquisition. Intangible assets subject to amortization acquired in 2012 were assigned useful lives
of five to 20 years and had a weighted-average amortization period of 13.6 years.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $18.7 million, $19.0 million and $14.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately: $18.5 million in
2014; $18.4 million in 2015; $18.0 million in 2016; $17.6 million in 2017; and $17.5 million in 2018.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 63
63
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 8 – FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Short-term debt for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries with
various banks with interest rates ranging from 0.87% to 4.86% and 0.61% to
2.28% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively
Short-term debt
2013
2012
$ 18.6
$ 18.6
$ 14.3
$ 14.3
The lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to $217.0 million. Most of these lines
of credit are uncommitted. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries had borrowings outstanding of $18.6 million
and guarantees of $1.2 million, which reduced the availability under these facilities to $197.2 million.
The weighted-average interest rate on short-term debt during the year was 3.2%, 3.2% and 4.1% in 2013, 2012 and 2011,
respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 4.6% and
1.5%, respectively.
On November 30, 2012, the Company entered into a $200 million Asset Securitization Agreement, which matures on
November 30, 2015. Under the terms of the Asset Securitization Agreement, the Company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain
domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary that in turn uses the
trade receivables to secure borrowings which are funded through a vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term
market. Borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement are limited to certain borrowing base calculations. Any amounts
outstanding under this Asset Securitization Agreement would be reported in short-term debt on the Company’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization
Agreement. However, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the availability of the Asset Securitization Agreement to $149.3
million at December 31, 2013. The cost of this facility, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a
financing cost and is included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The yield rate was 0.96%, 1.06% and
1.25%, at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Long-term debt for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, mature at various dates through
May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76%
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, maturing on September 15, 2014, with
an interest rate of 6.0%
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.06% at December 31, 2013)
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding
Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.15% at December 31, 2013)
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds,
maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.15% at December 31, 2013)
Other
Total debt
Less current maturities
Long-term debt
2013
2012
$ 175.0
$ 175.0
249.9
12.2
9.5
8.5
2.2
$ 457.3
250.7
$ 206.6
249.9
12.2
9.5
8.5
9.6
$ 464.7
9.6
$ 455.1
The Company has a $500 million Senior Credit Facility, which matures on May 11, 2016. At December 31, 2013, the Company had
no outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility, but had letters of credit outstanding totaling $8.6 million, which
reduced the availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $491.4 million. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the Company has two
financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At December 31, 2013, the Company
was in full compliance with the covenants under the Senior Credit Facility.
64
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 64
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 – Financing Arrangements (continued)
In 2011, the Company was notified that its variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds (the Bonds),
maturing on June 1, 2033, had lost their tax-exempt status and would now be taxable to its bondholders. As part of the settlement
with the IRS, the Company redeemed half of the balance during the third quarter of 2012 and agreed to redeem the remaining
balance of $8.5 million on December 31, 2022. In addition, the IRS agreed to allow the Bonds to remain tax-exempt during the
period they are outstanding.
The maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2013 are as follows: 2014 – $250.7 million;
2015 – $0.7 million; 2016 – $15.7 million; 2017 – $5.0 million; and 2018 – zero.
Interest paid was $31.0 million in 2013, $32.4 million in 2012 and $34.8 million in 2011. This differs from interest expense due to the
timing of payments and interest capitalized of $12.7 million in 2013, $4.9 million in 2012 and $1.2 million in 2011.
The Company and its subsidiaries lease a variety of real property and equipment. Rent expense under operating leases amounted
to $44.4 million, $43.6 million and $44.5 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2013, future minimum
lease payments for noncancelable operating leases totaled $125.7 million and are payable as follows: 2014 – $37.9 million;
2015 – $30.7 million; 2016 – $21.8 million; 2017 – $13.8 million; 2018 – $8.9 million and $12.6 million thereafter.
NOTE 9 – CONTINGENCIES
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been identified as potentially responsible parties for investigation and
remediation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) or similar state laws
with respect to certain sites. Claims for investigation and remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities, which
are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation.
The Company had an accrual of $2.6 million and $7.5 million for environmental matters that are probable and reasonably estimable
as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This accrual is recorded based upon the best estimate of costs to be incurred
in light of the progress made in determining the magnitude of remediation costs, the timing and extent of remedial actions
required by governmental authorities and the amount of the Company’s liability in proportion to other responsible parties. Of the
2013 accrual, $1.2 million is included in the rollforward of the restructuring accrual as of December 31, 2013, discussed further in
Note 10 – Impairment and Restructuring Charges.
In addition, the Company is subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of its business.
The Company accrues costs associated with legal and non-income tax matters when they become probable and reasonably
estimable. Accruals are established based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows to settle the obligations and are not reduced
by any potential recoveries from insurance or other indemnification claims. Management believes that any ultimate liability with
respect to these actions, in excess of amounts provided, will not materially affect the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
PRODUCT WARRANTIES:
In addition to the contingencies above, the Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The following is a
rollforward of the warranty reserves for 2013 and 2012:
Beginning balance, January 1
Expense (Income)
Payments
Ending balance, December 31
2013
$ 4.3
4.8
(4.8 )
$ 4.3
2012
$ 11.7
(0.9 )
(6.5 )
$ 4.3
The product warranty accrual for 2013 and 2012 was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 65
65
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 10 – IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
Impairment and restructuring charges by segment were as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2013:
Impairment charges
Severance expense and related benefit costs
Exit costs
Total
Year ended December 31, 2012:
Impairment charges
Severance expense and related benefit costs
Exit costs
Total
Year ended December 31, 2011:
Impairment charges
Severance expense and related benefit costs
Exit costs
Total
Mobile
Industries
Process
Industries
Aerospace
$ —
12.5
(1.5 )
$ 11.0
$ 0.1
2.6
0.9
$ 3.6
$ —
1.2
—
$ 1.2
Mobile
Industries
Process
Industries
Aerospace
$ 6.5
16.8
4.2
$
27.5
$ 0.1
1.6
0.3
$ 2.0
$ —
—
—
$ —
Mobile
Industries
Process
Industries
Aerospace
$ 0.2
0.2
13.0
$ 13.4
$ 0.3
(0.1 )
0.3
$ 0.5
$ —
—
0.5
$ 0.5
Steel
$ 0.6
—
—
$ 0.6
Steel
$ —
—
—
$ —
Steel
$ —
—
—
$ —
Total
$ 0.7
16.3
(0.6 )
$ 16.4
Total
$ 6.6
18.4
4.5
$ 29.5
Total
$ 0.5
0.1
13.8
$ 14.4
The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the periods presented; however,
it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts in the tables above.
MOBILE INDUSTRIES:
In May 2012, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in St. Thomas, which was expected to be completed
in approximately one year, and was intended to consolidate bearing production from this plant with existing U.S. operations to
better align the Company’s manufacturing footprint and customer base. In connection with this closure, the Company also moved
customer service for the Canadian market to its offices in Toronto. The Company completed the closure of this manufacturing
facility on March 31, 2013. The closure of the St. Thomas manufacturing facility displaced 190 employees. The Company expects to
incur pretax costs of approximately $55 million to $65 million in connection with this closure, of which approximately $20 million
to $25 million is expected to be pretax cash costs.
The Company has incurred pretax costs related to this closure of approximately $41.6 million as of December 31, 2013, including
rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold. During 2013, the Company recorded $8.2 million of severance and related
benefits, including pension settlement charges of $7.1 million, related to this closure. During 2012, the Company recorded
$16.9 million of severance and related benefits, including a curtailment of pension benefits of $10.7 million and impairment
charges of $6.5 million, related to this closure.
In March 2007, the Company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo. The Company completed the closure
of this manufacturing facility on March 31, 2010. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax expenses of approximately
$54.9 million as of December 31, 2013 related to this closure. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded a favorable
adjustment of $2.0 million, and exit costs of $6.8 million and $12.5 million, respectively, associated with the closure of this facility.
The favorable adjustment for 2013 and exit costs for 2012 primarily related to environmental remediation costs. Exit costs in 2011
also included workers’ compensation claims for former employees. The Company accrues environmental remediation costs and
workers’ compensation claims when they are probable and reasonably estimable.
66
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 66
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 10 – Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)
In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded a favorable adjustment of $2.7 million during 2012 for environmental
exit costs at the site of its former plant in Columbus, Ohio. The favorable adjustment was a result of the sale of the real estate at the
site of this former plant during the first quarter of 2012. The buyer assumed responsibility for the environmental remediation as a
result of the sale. The buyer was able to obtain funding from the State of Ohio to remediate the site.
WORKFORCE REDUCTIONS:
In 2013, the Company began the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and reduce costs. During 2013, the Company
recognized $5.9 million of severance and related benefit costs to eliminate approximately 180 positions. Of the $5.9 million charge
for 2013, $1.2 million related to the Aerospace segment, $2.5 million related to the Process Industries segment and $2.2 million
related to the Mobile Industries segment.
CONSOLIDATED RESTRUCTURING ACCRUAL:
The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the years ended December 31:
Beginning balance, January 1
Expense
Payments
Ending balance, December 31
2013
$ 17.6
8.7
(15.5 )
$ 10.8
2012
$ 21.8
12.2
(16.4 )
$ 17.6
The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2012 excluded costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of
$10.7 million. At December 31, 2013, the restructuring accrual included $1.2 million of environmental remediation costs. The
Company adjusts environmental remediation accruals based on the best available estimate of costs to be incurred, the timing and
extent of remedial actions required by governmental authorities and the amount of the Company’s liability in proportion to other
responsible parties.
NOTE 11 – SEPARATION COSTS
Separation costs for the year ended December 31 were as follows:
Severance expense and related benefit costs
Professional fees
Exit costs
Total
2013
$ 5.6
7.3
0.1
$ 13.0
On September 5, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a plan to pursue a separation of its steel
business from the rest of the Company through a spinoff, creating a new independent, publicly traded steel company, TimkenSteel
Corporation. The transaction is expected to be tax-free to shareholders and should be completed in mid-year 2014, subject to
customary regulatory approvals, the receipt of a legal opinion regarding the tax-free nature of the transaction, the execution of
intercompany agreements between the Company and the new steel company, final approval of the Company’s Board of Directors
and other customary matters. One-time transaction costs in connection with the separation of the two companies are expected to
be approximately $105 million. The majority of these costs include consulting and professional fees associated with preparing for
the spinoff. In addition, these costs include a cost reduction initiative to eliminate corporate positions to mitigate the incremental
enterprise costs with operating two separate companies. The expected cost of this cost reduction initiative is expected to be
approximately $15 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company recorded $5.6 million of severance and related benefit costs related to the cost reduction
initiative. The Company also recorded $7.3 million of professional fees related to the planned spinoff of the steel business.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 67
67
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 11 – Separation Costs (continued)
The following is a rollforward of the consolidated separation accrual for the year ended December 31:
Beginning balance, January 1
Expense
Payments
Ending balance, December 31
2013
$ —
13.0
(7.3 )
$ 5.7
The separation accrual at December 31, 2013 was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At
December 31, 2013, accrued separation costs included $3.8 million related to severance and related benefit costs and $1.9 million
related to professional fees. The professional fees are recorded when incurred.
NOTE 12 – STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
Under the Company’s long-term incentive plan, the Company’s common shares have been made available to grant, at the discretion
of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, to officers and key employees in the form of stock option awards. Stock
option awards typically have a ten-year term and generally vest in 25% increments annually beginning on the first anniversary of
the date of grant. In addition to stock option awards, the Company has granted restricted shares under the long-term incentive
plan. Restricted shares typically vest in 25% increments annually beginning on the first year anniversary of the date of grant and are
expensed over the vesting period.
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $12.1 million ($7.6 million after tax
or $0.08 per diluted share), $10.8 million ($6.8 million after tax or $0.07 per diluted share) and $9.4 million ($5.9 million after tax or
$0.06 per diluted share), respectively, for stock option awards.
The fair value of stock option awards granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing method with the following assumptions:
Weighted-average fair value per option
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Expected stock volatility
Expected life – years
2013
$ 21.17
1.09 %
2.29 %
50.66 %
6
2012
2011
$ 20.16
$ 19.93
1.15 %
1.94 %
50.00 %
6
2.76 %
2.00 %
48.10 %
6
Historical information was the primary basis for the selection of the expected dividend yield, expected volatility and the expected
lives of the options. The dividend yield was calculated based upon the last dividend prior to the grant compared to the trailing
12 months’ daily stock prices. The risk-free interest rate was based upon yields of U.S. zero coupon issues with a term equal to the
expected life of the option being valued. Forfeitures were estimated at 4%.
A summary of option activity for the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented below:
Number of Weighted-average
Weighted-average
Remaining
Exercise Price Contractual Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(millions)
Outstanding – beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Canceled or expired
Outstanding – end of year
Options expected to vest
Options exercisable
Shares
3,717,340
614,480
(928,803 )
(18,330 )
3,384,687
2,740,589
1,711,482
$ 33.59
56.27
23.09
49.86
$ 40.50
$ 36.93
$ 32.94
7 years
6 years
5 years
$ 49.5
$ 49.0
$ 37.9
68
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 68
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 12 – Stock Compensation Plans (continued)
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $25.2 million,
$28.2 million and $26.0 million, respectively. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $13.1 million,
$13.8 million and $16.6 million, respectively. Income tax benefits were $8.9 million, $8.1 million and $7.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
In 2013, the Company issued 260,740 strategic performance shares and 121,080 strategic shares to officers and key employees.
Strategic performance shares are performance-based restricted stock units that vest based on achievement of specified
performance objectives and cliff-vest after three years. Strategic performance shares settle in either cash or shares, with
243,580 shares expected to settle in cash and 17,160 expected to settle in shares. Strategic shares are timed-based restricted stock
units and generally vest in 25% increments annually beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Strategic shares also
settle in either cash or shares, with 65,400 strategic shares expected to settle in cash and 55,680 strategic shares expected to settle
in common shares. For shares that are expected to settle in cash, the Company accrued $6.2 million in 2013, which was included
in other non-current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
A summary of restricted share activity, including restricted shares, deferred shares, strategic performance shares that will settle in
common shares and strategic shares that will settle in common shares, for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:
Outstanding – beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Canceled or expired
Outstanding – end of year
Number
of Shares
524,064
111,640
(221,542 )
(17,110 )
397,052
Weighted-
average
Grant Date
Fair Value
$ 36.23
55.95
32.16
47.24
$ 43.57
As of December 31, 2013, a total of 397,052 restricted shares have been awarded that have not yet vested. The Company distributed
221,542, 249,569 and 302,924 shares in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to the vesting of these awards. The shares awarded
in 2013, 2012 and 2011 totaled 111,640, 161,905 and 246,890, respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense
of $6.5 million, $7.2 million and $7.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, relating to
restricted shares.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $28.1 million related to stock option awards
and restricted shares. The unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a total weighted-average
period of two years. The number of shares available for future grants for all plans at December 31, 2013 was 7,562,958.
The Company offers to certain employees a performance unit component under its long-term incentive plan in which awards
are earned based on Company performance measured by two metrics over a three-year performance period. The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors can elect to make payments that become due in the form of cash or the Company’s common
shares. A total of 34,756 performance units were granted in 2011. Performance units granted, if fully earned, would represent
156,183 of the Company’s common shares at December 31, 2012. Since the inception of the plan, 160,668 performance units were
canceled. Each performance unit has a cash value of $100.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 69
69
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 13 – RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor a number of defined benefit pension plans, which cover eligible employees, including
certain employees in foreign countries. These plans are generally noncontributory. Pension benefits earned are generally based
on years of service and compensation during active employment. The cash contributions for the Company’s defined benefit
pension plans were $120.7 million and $325.8 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The following tables summarize the net periodic benefit cost information and the related assumptions used to measure the net
periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Pension curtailments and settlements
Net periodic benefit cost
Assumptions
U.S. Plans:
Discount rate
Future compensation assumption
Expected long-term return on plan assets
International Plans:
Discount rate
Future compensation assumption
Expected long-term return on plan assets
2013
2012
2011
$ 38.5
134.7
(232.0 )
4.5
116.8
7.2
$ 69.7
$ 34.7
151.1
(221.1 )
9.3
83.3
11.6
$ 68.9
$ 32.2
158.6
(214.9 )
9.4
56.0
—
$ 41.3
2013
2012
2011
4.00 %
2.00% to 3.00 %
8.00 %
5.00 %
2.00% to 3.00 %
8.25 %
5.75 %
2.00% to 3.00 %
8.50 %
2.75% to 9.0 %
2.30% to 8.00 %
3.25% to 8.50 %
4.75% to 9.50 %
2.5% to 8.00 %
3.25% to 9.00 %
4.75% to 9.00 %
2.50% to 8.84 %
3.50% to 9.00 %
The discount rate assumption is based on current rates of high-quality long-term corporate bonds over the same period that
benefit payments will be required to be made. The expected rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on the weighted-
average expected return on the various asset classes in the plans’ portfolio. The asset class return is developed using historical
asset return performance as well as current market conditions such as inflation, interest rates and equity market performance.
For expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied a discount rate of 4.00% to its U.S. defined benefit pension plans. For expense
purposes in 2014, the Company will apply a discount rate of 5.02% to its U.S. defined benefit pension plans. A 0.25 percentage
point decrease in the discount rate would increase pension expense by approximately $5.3 million for 2014.
For expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied an expected rate of return of 8.00% for the Company’s U.S. pension plan
assets. For expense purposes in 2014, the Company will apply an expected rate of return on plan assets of 7.25%. A 0.25 percentage
point reduction in the expected rate of return would increase pension expense by approximately $6.6 million for 2014.
70
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 70
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the defined benefit pension plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Amendments
Actuarial (gains) losses
Employee contributions
International plan exchange rate change
Curtailment loss
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of year
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Employee contributions
Company contributions / payments
International plan exchange rate change
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status at end of year
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Non-current assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial loss
Net prior service cost
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive loss (AOCL):
AOCL at beginning of year
Net actuarial (gain) loss
Prior service cost
Recognized net actuarial loss
Recognized prior service cost
Loss recognized due to curtailment
Foreign currency impact
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31
2013
2012
$ 3,496.3
38.5
134.7
—
(274.4 )
0.2
5.3
—
(267.1 )
$ 3,133.5
$ 3,098.4
334.0
0.2
120.7
4.4
(267.1 )
3,290.6
$ 3,124.6
34.7
151.1
(0.3 )
394.1
0.2
18.2
9.5
(235.8 )
$ 3,496.3
$ 2,631.9
361.7
0.2
325.8
14.6
(235.8 )
3,098.4
$ 157.1
$ (397.9 )
$ 342.6
(6.5 )
(179.0 )
$ 157.1
$ 0.3
(6.8 )
(391.4 )
$ (397.9 )
$ 989.1
19.0
$ 1,008.1
$ 1,489.4
23.5
$ 1,512.9
2013
$ 1,512.9
(376.3 )
—
(116.8 )
(4.5 )
(7.2 )
—
$ 1,008.1
2012
$ 1,348.2
263.1
(0.3 )
(83.3 )
(9.3 )
(11.6 )
6.1
$ 1,512.9
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 71
71
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The presentation in the above tables for amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets is before the effect of income taxes.
The following table summarizes assumptions used to measure the benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plans at
December 31:
Assumptions
U.S. Plans:
Discount rate
Future compensation assumption
International Plans:
Discount rate
Future compensation assumption
2013
2012
5.02%
2.00% to 3.00%
4.00%
2.00% to 3.00%
3.25% to 9.75%
2.30% to 8.00%
2.75% to 9.5%
2.3% to 8.0%
Defined benefit pension plans in the United States represent 84% of the benefit obligation and 87% of the fair value of plan assets
as of December 31, 2013.
Certain of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans were overfunded as of December 31, 2013. As a result, $342.6 million and
$0.2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are included in non-current pension assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The current portion of accrued pension cost, which is included in salaries, wages and benefits on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, was $6.5 million and $6.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2013, the current portion of accrued
pension cost relates to unfunded plans and represents the actuarial present value of expected payments related to the plans to
be made over the next 12 months.
The accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2013 exceeded the market value of plan assets for several of the Company’s
pension plans. For these plans, the projected benefit obligation was $600.6 million, the accumulated benefit obligation was
$585.8 million and the fair value of plan assets was $415.6 million at December 31, 2013.
The total pension accumulated benefit obligation for all plans was $3.0 billion and $3.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and
2012, respectively.
Due to significant increases in global capital markets in 2013, investment performance increased the value of the Company’s
pension assets by 10.8%.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s defined benefit pension plans did not directly hold any of the Company’s
common shares.
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $71.0 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
PLAN ASSETS:
The Company’s target allocation for pension plan assets, as well as the actual pension plan asset allocations as of December 31,
2013 and 2012, was as follows:
Current Target
Allocation
Percentage of Pension Plan
Assets at December 31,
35% to 52%
35% to 50%
9% to 19%
2013
43 %
45 %
12 %
100 %
2012
47 %
40 %
13 %
100 %
Asset Category
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other
Total
72
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 72
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The Company recognizes its overall responsibility to ensure that the assets of its various defined benefit pension plans are
managed effectively and prudently and in compliance with its policy guidelines and all applicable laws. Preservation of capital is
important; however, the Company also recognizes that appropriate levels of risk are necessary to allow its investment managers
to achieve satisfactory long-term results consistent with the objectives and the fiduciary character of the pension funds. Asset
allocations are established in a manner consistent with projected plan liabilities, benefit payments and expected rates of return
for various asset classes. The expected rate of return for the investment portfolio is based on expected rates of return for various
asset classes, as well as historical asset class and fund performance.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The FASB provides accounting rules that classify the inputs
used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical
or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those investments of the Company’s pension assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Government and agency securities
Corporate bonds – investment grade
Corporate bonds – non-investment grade
Equity securities – U.S. companies
Equity securities – international companies
Asset backed securities
Common collective funds – domestic equities
Common collective funds – international equities
Common collective funds – fixed income
Common collective funds – other
Limited partnerships
Real estate partnerships
Mutual funds – real estate
Other assets
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 364.0
188.4
301.1
110.1
300.6
311.5
38.2
195.6
387.5
625.4
87.2
78.8
145.6
155.9
0.7
$ 3.3
175.0
—
—
299.2
311.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
155.9
—
$ 360.7
13.4
301.1
110.1
1.4
—
38.2
195.6
387.5
625.4
87.2
—
124.5
—
0.7
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
78.8
21.1
—
—
Total Assets
$ 3,290.6
$ 944.9
$ 2,245.8
$ 99.9
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 73
73
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the level 3 assets by fund for the year ended December 31,
2013:
Beginning balance, January 1
Purchases
Sales
Realized losses
Unrealized gains
Ending balance, December 31
Limited
Partnerships
$ 79.9
5.3
(11.5 )
(6.2 )
11.3
Real
Estate
$ 16.3
3.5
(0.6 )
(0.1 )
2.0
Total
$ 96.2
8.8
(12.1 )
(6.3 )
13.3
$ 78.8
$ 21.1
$ 99.9
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those investments of the Company’s pension assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Government and agency securities
Corporate bonds – investment grade
Corporate bonds – non-investment grade
Equity securities – U.S. companies
Equity securities – international companies
Asset backed securities
Common collective funds – domestic equities
Common collective funds – international equities
Common collective funds – fixed income
Common collective funds – other
Limited partnerships
Real estate partnerships
Mutual funds – real estate
Other assets
Total Assets
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 80.0
226.2
263.7
103.9
347.6
273.6
55.4
350.1
365.3
620.1
39.7
79.9
128.6
163.6
0.7
$ 3,098.4
$ 3.1
193.9
—
—
347.2
273.6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
163.6
—
$ 981.4
$ 76.9
32.3
263.7
103.9
0.4
—
55.4
350.1
365.3
620.1
39.7
—
112.3
—
0.7
$ —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
79.9
16.3
—
—
$ 2,020.8
$ 96.2
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the level 3 assets by fund for the year ended December 31,
2012:
Beginning balance, January 1
Purchases
Sales
Realized losses
Unrealized gains (losses)
Ending balance, December 31
Limited
Partnerships
$ 83.6
7.1
(8.5 )
(3.4 )
1.1
Real
Estate
$ 6.6
11.3
(1.5 )
—
(0.1 )
$ 79.9
$ 16.3
Total
$ 90.2
18.4
(10.0 )
(3.4 )
1.0
$ 96.2
74
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 74
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13 – Retirement Benefit Plans (continued)
Cash and cash equivalents are valued at redemption value. Government and agency securities are valued at the closing price
reported in the active market in which the individual securities are traded. Certain corporate bonds are valued at the closing price
reported in the active market in which the bond is traded. Equity securities (both common and preferred stock) are valued at the
closing price reported in the active market in which the individual security is traded. Common collective funds are valued based
on a net asset value per share. Asset-backed securities are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets. When
such prices are unavailable, the plan trustee determines a valuation from the market maker dealing in the particular security.
Limited partnerships include investments in funds that invest primarily in private equity, venture capital and distressed debt.
Limited partnerships are valued based on the ownership interest in the net asset value of the investment, which is used as a
practical expedient to fair value, per the underlying investment fund, which is based upon the general partner’s own assumptions
about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the assets and liabilities of the partnership. Real estate
investments include funds that invest in companies that primarily invest in commercial and residential properties, commercial
mortgage-backed securities, debt and equity securities of real estate operating companies, and real estate investment trusts.
Mutual funds – real estate are valued based on the closing price reported in the active market in which the individual security is
traded. Other real estate investments are valued based on the ownership interest in the net asset value of the investment, which
is used as a practical expedient to fair value per the underlying investment fund, which is based on appraised values and current
transaction prices.
CASH FLOWS:
Employer Contributions to Defined Benefit Plans
2012
2013
2014 (planned)
Future benefit payments are expected to be as follows:
Benefit Payments
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019–2023
$ 325.8
120.7
20.0
$ 233.4
253.9
223.7
224.0
231.9
1,094.4
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLANS:
The Company sponsors defined contribution retirement and savings plans covering substantially all employees in the United
States and employees at certain non-U.S. locations. The Company has contributed Timken common shares to certain of these
plans based on formulas established in the respective plan agreements. At December 31, 2013, the plans held 5,701,671 of the
Company’s common shares with a fair value of $314.0 million. Company contributions to the plans, including performance sharing,
were $28.5 million in 2013, $24.9 million in 2012 and $26.4 million in 2011. The Company paid dividends totaling $5.5 million in
2013, $6.3 million in 2012 and $5.7 million in 2011 to plans holding the Company’s common shares.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 75
75
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 14 – POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor several funded and unfunded postretirement plans that provide health care and life
insurance benefits for eligible retirees and dependents. Depending on retirement date and employee classification, certain health
care plans contain contribution and cost-sharing features such as deductibles, coinsurance and limitations on employer-provided
subsidies. The remaining health care and life insurance plans are noncontributory.
The following tables summarize the net periodic benefit cost information and the related assumptions used to measure the net
periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service credit
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Net periodic benefit cost
Assumptions:
Discount rate
Rate of return
2013
2012
2011
$ 2.9
21.7
(11.1 )
(0.2 )
2.3
$ 15.6
2013
3.80 %
5.00 %
$ 2.5
28.4
(10.6 )
(0.2 )
2.5
$ 22.6
$ 2.5
32.9
(4.4 )
(0.3 )
2.9
$ 33.6
2012
4.85 %
5.00 %
2011
5.50 %
5.00 %
The discount rate assumption is based on current rates of high-quality long-term corporate bonds over the same period that
benefit payments will be required to be made. The expected rate of return on plan assets assumption is based on the weighted-
average expected return on the various asset classes in the plans’ portfolio. The asset class return is developed using historical
asset return performance as well as current market conditions such as inflation, interest rates and equity market performance.
For expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied a discount rate of 3.80% to its postretirement benefit plans. For expense
purposes in 2014, the Company will apply a discount rate of 4.59% to its postretirement benefit plans. A 0.25 percentage point
reduction in the discount rate would increase postretirement benefit expense by approximately $0.5 million for 2014.
In December 2010, the Company established a VEBA trust for The Timken Company Bargaining Unit Welfare Benefit Plan. For
expense purposes in 2013, the Company applied an expected rate of return of 5.00% to the VEBA trust assets. For expense
purposes in 2014, the Company will apply an expected rate of return on plan assets of 5.00%. A 0.25 percentage point reduction in
the expected rate of return would increase postretirement benefit expense by approximately $0.6 million for 2014.
76
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 76
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 – Postretirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the defined benefit postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
2013
2012
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Amendments
Actuarial (gains) losses
Benefits paid
Benefit obligation at end of year
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions / payments
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status at end of year
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial loss
Net prior service cost
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in AOCL:
AOCL at beginning of year
Net actuarial (gain) loss
Prior service cost
Recognized net actuarial loss
Recognized prior service credit
Total recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31
$ 639.2
2.9
21.7
—
(101.9 )
(46.3 )
$ 515.6
$ 221.9
27.2
37.3
(46.3 )
240.1
$ (275.5 )
$ (41.6 )
(233.9 )
$ (275.5 )
$ 5.5
7.8
$ 13.3
$ 133.3
(117.9 )
—
(2.3 )
0.2
$ 13.3
$ 628.6
2.5
28.4
0.9
24.5
(45.7 )
$ 639.2
$ 170.9
9.8
86.9
(45.7 )
221.9
$ (417.3 )
$ (45.5 )
(371.8 )
$ (417.3 )
$ 125.7
7.6
$ 133.3
$ 109.5
25.2
0.9
(2.5 )
0.2
$ 133.3
The presentation in the above tables for amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets is before the effect of income taxes.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 77
77
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 14 – Postretirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The following table summarizes assumptions used to measure the benefit obligation for the postretirement benefit plans at
December 31:
Assumptions:
Discount rate
Rate of return
2013
4.59 %
5.00 %
2012
3.80
5.00
The current portion of accrued postretirement benefit cost, which is included in salaries, wages and benefits on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets, was $41.6 million and $45.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2013, the current portion of
accrued postretirement benefit cost related to unfunded plans and represents the actuarial present value of expected payments
related to the plans to be made over the next 12 months.
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the postretirement plans that will be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are zero expense and $1.4 million of expense, respectively.
For measurement purposes, the Company assumed a weighted-average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost (health care
cost trend rate) for medical benefits of 7.25% for 2014, declining gradually to 5.0% in 2023 and thereafter; and 7.25% for 2014,
declining gradually to 5.0% in 2023 and thereafter for prescription drug benefits; and 9.25% for 2014, declining gradually to 5.0%
in 2031 and thereafter for HMO benefits.
The assumed health care cost trend rate may have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase in
the assumed health care cost trend rate would have increased the 2013 total service and interest cost components by $0.5 million
and would have increased the postretirement benefit obligation by $10.4 million. A one percentage point decrease would provide
corresponding reductions of $0.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) provides for prescription drug
benefits under Medicare Part D and contains a subsidy to plan sponsors who provide “actuarially equivalent” prescription plans. The
Company’s actuary determined that the prescription drug benefit provided by the Company’s postretirement plan is considered
to be actuarially equivalent to the benefit provided under the Medicare Act. In accordance with ASC 715, “Compensation –
Retirement Benefits,” all measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or net periodic postretirement benefit
cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes reflect the effects of the Medicare Act on the plan for the entire fiscal year.
The 2013 expected subsidy was $3.1 million, of which $1.4 million was received prior to December 31, 2013.
PLAN ASSETS:
The Company’s target allocation for the VEBA trust assets, as well as the actual VEBA trust asset allocation as of December 31, 2013
and 2012, was as follows:
Asset Category
Equity securities
Debt securities
Total
Current Target
Allocation
Percentage of VEBA Assets
at December 31,
45% to 55%
45% to 55%
2013
55 %
45 %
100 %
2012
49 %
51 %
100 %
The Company recognizes its overall responsibility to ensure that the assets of its postretirement benefit plan are managed
effectively and prudently and in compliance with its policy guidelines and all applicable laws.
Preservation of capital is important; however, the Company also recognizes that appropriate levels of risk are necessary to allow
its investment managers to achieve satisfactory long-term results consistent with the objectives and the fiduciary character of the
postretirement funds. Asset allocations are established in a manner consistent with projected plan liabilities, benefit payments
and expected rates of return for various asset classes. The expected rate of return for the investment portfolio is based on expected
rates of return for various asset classes, as well as historical asset class and fund performance.
78
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 78
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 – Postretirement Benefit Plans (continued)
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those investments of the Company’s VEBA trust assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Common collective funds – U.S. equities
Common collective funds – international equities
Common collective funds – fixed income
Total Assets
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 2.9
82.7
49.7
104.8
$ 240.1
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
$ 2.9
82.7
49.7
104.8
$ 240.1
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those investments of the Company’s VEBA trust assets measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Common collective funds – U.S. equities
Common collective funds – international equities
Common collective funds – fixed income
Total Assets
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 2.1
65.6
43.4
110.8
$ 221.9
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
$ 2.1
65.6
43.4
110.8
$ 221.9
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
Cash and cash equivalents are valued at redemption value. Common collective funds are valued based on a net asset value per
share, which is used as a practical expedient to fair value. When such prices are unavailable, the plan trustee determines a valuation
from the market maker dealing in the particular security.
CASH FLOWS:
Employer Contributions to Postretirement Benefit Plans:
2012
2013
2014 (planned)
Future benefit payments are expected to be as follows:
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019–2023
$ 50.0
—
—
Expected
Medicare
Subsidies
Net Including
Medicare
Subsidies
$ 2.7
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.2
15.7
$ 50.9
49.1
47.4
45.8
44.4
190.9
Gross
$ 53.6
52.0
50.5
49.0
47.6
206.6
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 79
79
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 15 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates under four reporting segments: (1) Mobile Industries; (2) Process Industries; (3) Aerospace; and (4) Steel.
Description of types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues:
The Company’s reportable segments are business units that target different industry sectors. Each reportable segment is managed
separately to address specific customer needs in these diverse market segments.
The Mobile Industries segment includes global sales of bearings, mechanical power transmission components, drive-chains,
roller-chains, augers and related products and services (other than steel) to a diverse customer base, including original equipment
manufacturers and their suppliers of passenger cars, light trucks, medium to heavy-duty trucks, rail cars, locomotives, agricultural,
construction and mining equipment. The Mobile Industries segment also includes aftermarket distribution operations for
automotive and heavy truck applications.
The Process Industries segment includes global sales of bearings, mechanical power transmission components, industrial chains,
augers and related products and services (other than steel) to a diverse customer base including original equipment manufacturers
in the power transmission, energy and heavy industry market sectors. The Process Industries segment also includes aftermarket
distribution operations for products other than steel and automotive applications.
The Aerospace segment includes sales of bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor head assemblies, turbine engine
components, gears and other precision flight-critical components for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace
segment also provides aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls as well as
aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. The Aerospace segment also includes sales of precision bearings and
related products for health and critical motion control applications.
The Steel segment manufactures alloy steel as well as carbon and micro-alloy steel. Included in its portfolio are SBQ bars and
seamless mechanical tubing. In addition, this segment supplies machining and thermal treatment services, as well as manages
raw material recycling programs. This segment’s metallurgical expertise and unique operational capabilities drive customized,
high-value solutions for the mobile, industrial and energy sectors. Less than 10% of the Company’s steel is directly consumed
in its bearing operations. In addition, the Company sells steel to other anti-friction bearing companies and to aircraft, forging,
construction, industrial equipment, mining, tooling, oil and gas drilling and automotive industries and steel service centers.
Measurement of segment profit or loss and segment assets:
The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on return on capital and profitable growth. The primary
measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is EBIT.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at values based on market prices, which creates intercompany profit on
intersegment sales or transfers that is eliminated in consolidation.
Factors used by management to identify the enterprise’s reportable segments:
Net sales by geographic area are reported by the destination of net sales, which is reflective of how the Company operates its
segments. Long-lived assets by geographic area are reported by the location of the subsidiary.
Export sales from the United States and Canada are less than 10% of the Company’s revenue. The Company’s Mobile Industries,
Process Industries and Aerospace segments have historically participated in the global bearing industry, while the Steel segment
has concentrated primarily on U.S. customers.
Timken’s non-U.S. operations are subject to normal international business risks not generally applicable to domestic business.
These risks include currency fluctuation, changes in tariff restrictions, difficulties in establishing and maintaining relationships
with local distributors and dealers, import and export licensing requirements, difficulties in staffing and managing geographically
diverse operations and restrictive regulations by foreign governments, including price and exchange controls.
80
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 80
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Note 15 – Segment Information (continued)
GEOGRAPHIC FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Net sales:
United States
Canada & Mexico
South America
Europe / Middle East / Africa
Asia-Pacific
Long-lived assets:
United States
Canada & Mexico
South America
Europe / Middle East / Africa
Asia-Pacific
2013
2012
2011
$ 2,887.7
258.9
141.8
574.0
478.8
$ 3,420.3
275.1
153.5
594.2
543.9
$ 3,494.6
268.4
186.0
652.3
568.9
$ 4,341.2
$ 4,987.0
$ 5,170.2
$ 1,199.4
12.6
2.1
105.5
238.5
$ 1,055.7
6.1
4.4
101.6
237.5
$ 963.1
16.3
6.2
102.0
221.3
$ 1,558.1
$ 1,405.3
$ 1,308.9
BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION:
The following tables provide segment financial information and a reconciliation of segment results to consolidated results:
Net sales to external customers:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Intersegment sales:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Steel
Segment EBIT:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Total EBIT, for reportable segments
Unallocated corporate expenses
CDSOA receipts, net of expense
Separation costs
Interest expense
Interest income
Intersegment adjustments
Income before income taxes
2013
2012
2011
$ 1,474.3
1,231.7
329.5
1,305.7
$ 1,675.0
1,337.6
346.9
1,627.5
$ 1,768.9
1,240.5
324.1
1,836.7
$ 4,341.2
$ 4,987.0
$ 5,170.2
$ 1.1
3.9
75.1
$ 0.5
5.7
101.2
$ 0.5
4.1
119.8
$ 80.1
$ 107.4
$ 124.4
$ 164.7
201.9
26.6
140.2
$ 208.1
274.9
36.3
251.8
$ 261.8
274.2
5.1
267.4
$ 533.4
$ 771.1
$ 808.5
(82.5 )
—
(13.0 )
(24.4 )
1.9
1.7
(84.4 )
108.0
—
(31.1 )
2.9
(0.5 )
(80.8 )
—
—
(36.8 )
5.6
0.3
$ 417.1
$ 766.0
$ 696.8
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 81
81
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 15 – Segment Information (continued)
Assets employed at year-end:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Corporate
Capital expenditures:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Corporate
Depreciation and amortization:
Mobile Industries
Process Industries
Aerospace
Steel
Corporate
Corporate assets include corporate buildings and cash and cash equivalents.
2013
2012
2011
$ 1,051.4
1,096.7
555.8
1,198.9
575.1
$ 1,052.9
1,056.2
480.6
921.4
733.1
$ 1,233.7
979.3
526.6
954.2
633.6
$ 4,477.9
$ 4,244.2
$ 4,327.4
$ 40.3
80.1
7.8
192.6
5.0
$ 32.1
72.4
14.0
175.5
3.2
$ 39.5
54.4
10.6
99.8
1.0
$ 325.8
$ 297.2
$ 205.3
$ 50.2
67.4
20.5
53.8
2.7
$ 60.8
62.2
23.1
49.7
2.2
$ 70.2
51.8
23.2
45.8
1.5
$ 194.6
$ 198.0
$ 192.5
82
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 82
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 16 – INCOME TAXES
Income before income taxes, based on geographic location of the operations to which such earnings are attributable, is provided
below. As the Company has elected to treat certain foreign subsidiaries as branches for U.S. income tax purposes, pretax income
attributable to the United States shown below may differ from the pretax income reported in the Company’s annual U.S. Federal
income tax return.
Income before income taxes:
United States
Non-United States
Income before income taxes
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following:
Current:
Federal
State and local
Foreign
Deferred:
Federal
State and local
Foreign
United States and foreign tax expense on income
2013
$ 314.5
102.6
$ 417.1
2012
$ 680.8
85.2
$ 766.0
2011
$ 527.6
169.2
$ 696.8
2013
2012
2011
$ 99.9
14.4
39.3
$ 153.6
$ (3.4 )
2.9
1.0
$ 0.5
$ 154.1
$ 103.5
7.2
36.3
$ 147.0
$ 105.2
18.1
(0.2 )
$ 123.1
$ 270.1
$ 53.8
6.8
55.1
$ 115.7
$ 117.7
11.7
(4.9 )
$ 124.5
$ 240.2
The Company made net income tax payments of $111.2 million, $121.0 million and $101.9 million in 2013, 2012 and
2011, respectively.
The following table is the reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the U.S.
Federal income tax rate of 35% to income before taxes:
Income tax at the U.S. federal statutory rate
Adjustments:
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
Tax on foreign remittances and U.S. tax on foreign income
Tax expense related to undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
Foreign losses without current tax benefits
Foreign earnings taxed at different rates including tax holidays
U.S. domestic manufacturing deduction
U.S. foreign tax credit
U.S. research tax credit
Accruals and settlements related to tax audits
Other items, net
2013
2012
2011
$ 146.0
$ 268.1
$ 243.9
10.9
41.0
8.7
9.5
(4.4 )
(11.3 )
(25.9 )
(3.8 )
(16.9 )
0.3
15.6
9.5
—
16.1
(18.1 )
(7.5 )
(13.7 )
(0.4 )
4.3
(3.8 )
11.2
15.3
—
7.7
(26.4 )
(6.6 )
—
(1.5 )
1.2
(4.6 )
Provision for income taxes
Effective income tax rate
$ 154.1
$ 270.1
$ 240.2
36.9 %
35.3 %
34.5 %
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 83
83
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
Note 16 – Income Taxes (continued)
In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company implemented a strategy to repatriate approximately $365 million of cash, incurring tax
expense of approximately $26 million. The Company repatriated $123 million of cash in January 2014, with the remaining portion
expected to be repatriated in future periods. In connection with various investment arrangements, the Company has been granted
a “holiday” from income taxes for one affiliate in Asia for 2013 and 2012 and two affiliates in Asia for 2011. These agreements began
to expire at the end of 2010, with full expiration in 2018. In total, the agreements reduced income tax expense by $0.7 million in
2013, $1.0 million in 2012 and $1.0 million in 2011. These savings resulted in an increase to earnings per diluted share of $0.01 in
2013, $0.01 in 2012 and $0.01 in 2011.
Income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes. The Company had undistributed earnings related to its
international subsidiaries of $577.9 million and $544.0 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. A deferred tax liability
of $8.7 million has been accrued at December 31, 2013 for earnings of $136.1 million (relating to the$365 million cash repatriation
strategy) that are available to be repatriated to the U.S. No provisions for U.S. income taxes have been made with respect to
earnings of $441.8 million that are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the United States. The amount of U.S. income
taxes that may be applicable to such earnings is $23.3 million if such earnings were repatriated, net of foreign tax credits.
The effect of temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued postretirement benefits cost
Accrued pension cost
Inventory
Other employee benefit accruals
Tax loss and credit carryforwards
Other, net
Valuation allowances
Pension assets
Deferred tax liabilities – principally depreciation and amortization
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets
2013
2012
$ 130.1
—
4.0
20.3
166.7
52.6
(195.9 )
$ 177.8
(33.4 )
(239.0 )
$ (94.6 )
$ 185.0
137.1
15.4
26.6
145.1
59.9
(183.9 )
$ 385.2
—
(231.9 )
$ 153.3
The Company has a U.S. foreign tax credit carryforward of $19.9 million that will begin to expire in 2018, and U.S. state and
local credit carryforwards of $2.1 million, portions of which will expire in 2014. The Company also has U.S. state and local loss
carryforwards with tax benefits totaling $1.0 million, portions of which will expire at the end of 2014. In addition, the Company
has loss carryforwards in various non-U.S. jurisdictions with tax benefits totaling $143.4 million having various expiration dates, as
well as tax credit carryforwards of $0.2 million. The Company has provided valuation allowances of $162.2 million against certain
of these carryforwards. The majority of the non-U.S. loss carryforwards represent local country net operating losses for branches of
the Company or entities treated as branches of the Company under U.S. tax law. Tax benefits have been recorded for these losses in
the United States. The related local country net operating loss carryforwards are offset fully by valuation allowances. In addition to
loss and credit carryforwards, the Company has provided valuation allowances of $33.7 million against other deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $49.5 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included in this amount was
$35.8 million, which represented the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would favorably impact the Company’s effective
income tax rate in any future periods if such benefits were recognized. As of December 31, 2013, the Company anticipates a
decrease in its unrecognized tax positions of approximately $30.0 million to $35.0 million during the next 12 months. The
anticipated decrease is primarily due to settlements with tax authorities and the expiration of various statutes of limitation. As
of December 31, 2013, the Company had accrued $9.8 million of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The
Company records interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
84
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 84
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 16 – Income Taxes (continued)
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had $112.6 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included in this amount was
$47.5 million, which represented the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would favorably impact the Company’s effective
income tax rate in any future periods if such benefits were recognized. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had accrued
$11.3 million of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The following table reconciles the Company’s total gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2013
and 2012:
Beginning balance, January 1
Tax positions related to the current year:
Additions
Tax positions related to prior years:
Additions
Reductions
Settlements with tax authorities
Lapses in statutes of limitation
Ending balance, December 31
2013
$ 112.6
2012
$ 87.2
9.3
6.9
(1.4 )
(77.9 )
—
20.6
7.0
(1.7 )
—
(0.5 )
$ 49.5
$ 112.6
During 2013, gross unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to net reductions related to various current year and prior
year tax matters, including settlement of tax matters with government authorities and taxes related to the Company’s international
operations. These decreases were partially offset by additions related to prior year tax matters, including certain U.S. federal taxes,
U.S. state and local taxes and taxes related to the Company’s international operations.
During 2012, gross unrecognized tax benefits increased primarily due to net additions related to various prior year tax matters,
including U.S. state and local taxes, and taxes related to the Company’s international operations. These increases were partially offset
by reductions related to prior year tax matters, including U.S. state and local taxes and taxes related to the Company’s international
operations, settlement of tax matters with government authorities and lapses in statutes of limitation on various tax matters.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company was subject to examination by the IRS for tax years 2012 to the present. The Company was
also subject to tax examination in various U.S. state and local tax jurisdictions for tax years 2006 to the present, as well as various
foreign tax jurisdictions, including Germany, Italy and India for tax years 2002 to the present. The current portion of the Company’s
unrecognized tax benefits was presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within income taxes payable, and the non-current
portion was presented as a component of other non-current liabilities.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 85
85
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
NOTE 17 – FAIR VALUE
The following tables present the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted Cash
Short-term investments
Foreign currency hedges
Total Assets
Liabilities:
Foreign currency hedges
Total Liabilities
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted Cash
Short-term investments
Foreign currency hedges
Total Assets
Liabilities:
Foreign currency hedges
Total Liabilities
December 31, 2013
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 384.6
15.1
13.9
0.9
$ 414.5
$ 320.4
—
—
—
$ 320.4
$ 9.3
$ 9.3
$ —
$ —
$ 64.2
15.1
13.9
0.9
$ 94.1
$ 9.3
$ 9.3
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
$ —
$ —
December 31, 2012
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$ 586.4
15.1
17.3
1.2
$ 620.0
$ 303.9
—
—
—
$ 303.9
$ 1.9
$ 1.9
$ —
$ —
$ 282.5
15.1
17.3
1.2
$ 316.1
$ 1.9
$ 1.9
$ —
—
—
—
$ —
$ —
$ —
Cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased and are valued
at redemption value. Short-term investments are investments with maturities between four months and one year and are valued
at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company uses publicly available foreign currency forward and spot rates to
measure the fair value of its foreign currency forward contracts.
The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of risk associated with the counterparts to its financial instruments.
During 2012, machinery and equipment primarily associated with the manufacturing facility in St. Thomas with a carrying value of
$10.4 million was written down to its fair value of $3.8 million, resulting in an impairment loss of $6.6 million. The fair value of these
assets was based on the price that would be expected to be received in a current transaction to sell the assets on a standalone
basis, considering the age and physical attributes of the equipment, compared to the cost of similar used equipment. The fair
value of machinery and equipment was measured using Level 3 inputs.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable,
net, accounts payable, trade, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of
cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable, trade and short-term borrowings
are a reasonable estimate of their fair value. The fair value of the Company’s long-term fixed-rate debt, based on quoted market
prices, was $474.5 million and $481.3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The carrying value of this debt was
$441.6 million and $424.9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
86
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 86
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 18 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using
derivative instruments are foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on
various foreign currencies are entered into in order to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted revenue
denominated in foreign currencies. Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into in order
to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of the Company’s commitments denominated in
foreign currencies. Forward contracts on various commodities are entered into in order to manage the price risk associated with
forecasted purchases of natural gas used in the Company’s manufacturing process. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage
interest rate risk associated with the Company’s fixed and floating-rate borrowings.
The Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted revenues and certain
interest rate hedges as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings. The majority of the Company’s natural gas forward contracts are
not subject to any hedge designation as they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.
The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As of December 31, 2013
and 2012, the Company had $516.7 million and $97.0 million, respectively, of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at
notional value. Refer to Note 16 – Fair Value for the fair value disclosure of derivative financial instruments,
CASH FLOW HEDGING STRATEGY:
For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability
in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative
instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item
associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of
future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the current period.
To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from export sales over the next
year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted
intra-group revenue or expense denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens
significantly against foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue is offset by gains in
the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely, when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present
value of future foreign currency cash flows is offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.
FAIR VALUE HEDGING STRATEGY:
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to changes in the fair
value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative
instrument as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the same line
item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in “interest expense” when the hedged item is fixed-rate debt).
NOTE 19 – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company performs research and development under Company-funded programs and under contracts with the federal
government and others. Expenditures committed to research and development amounted to $46.1 million, $52.6 million and
$49.6 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were
funded by others. Expenditures may fluctuate from year-to-year depending on special projects and needs.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 87
87
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES NOTE 20 – CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT (CDSOA)
CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (U.S. Customs) from antidumping
cases to qualifying domestic producers where the domestic producers have continued to invest in their technology, equipment
and people. The Company reported CDSOA expense of $2.8 million and income of $108.0 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In September 2002, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that CDSOA payments are not consistent with international trade
rules. In February 2006, U.S. legislation was enacted that ended CDSOA distributions for dumped imports covered by antidumping
duty orders entering the United States after September 30, 2007. Instead, any such antidumping duties collected would remain
with the U.S. Treasury. Several countries have objected that this U.S. legislation is not consistent with WTO rulings, and were
granted retaliation rights by the WTO, typically in the form of increased tariffs on some imported goods from the United States.
The European Union and Japan have been retaliating in this fashion against the operation of U.S. law.
In 2006, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled, in two separate decisions, that the procedure for determining recipients
eligible to receive CDSOA distributions was unconstitutional. In addition, several other court cases challenging various provisions
of CDSOA were ongoing. As a result, from 2006 through 2010, U.S. Customs withheld a portion of the amounts that would
otherwise have been distributed under CDSOA.
In February 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both of the 2006 decisions of the CIT. Later in December
2009, a plaintiff petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a further appeal, but the Supreme Court declined the petition, allowing
the appellate court reversals to stand. At that time, several court cases challenging various provisions of the CDSOA were still
unresolved, so U.S. Customs accepted the CIT’s recommendation to continue to withhold CDSOA receipts related to 2006 through
2010 until January 2012.
U.S. Customs began distributing the withheld funds to affected domestic producers in early April 2012. In April 2012, the Company
received CDSOA distributions of $112.8 million in the aggregate for amounts originally withheld from 2006 through 2010.
While some of the challenges to CDSOA have been resolved, others are still in litigation. Since there continue to be legal challenges
to CDSOA, U.S. Customs has advised all affected domestic producers that it is possible that CDSOA distributions could be subject
to clawback. Management of the Company believes that the likelihood of clawback is remote.
88
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 88
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 21 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited)
Net sales
Gross profit
Impairment and restructuring charges (1)
Separation costs
Net income
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
(2)
(3)
interests
Net income attributable to The Timken Company
Net income per share – Basic:
Total net income per share
Net income per share – Diluted:
Total net income per share
1st
2nd
$ 1,089.9
274.5
1.2
—
75.0
$ 1,126.5
302.1
6.7
—
82.8
2013
3rd
$ 1,061.5
251.7
3.7
—
52.5
4th
Total
$ 1,063.3
263.7
4.8
13.0
52.7
$ 4,341.2
1,092.0
16.4
13.0
263.0
(0.1 )
75.1
—
82.8
0.3
52.2
0.1
52.6
0.3
262.7
$ 0.78
$ 0.86
$ 0.55
$ 0.56
$ 2.76
$ 0.77
$ 0.86
$ 0.54
$ 0.55
$ 2.74
Dividends per share
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.92
Net sales
Gross profit
Impairment and restructuring charges (4)
Net income (5)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
Net income attributable to The Timken Company
Net income per share – Basic:
Total net income per share
Net income per share – Diluted:
Total net income per share
1st
2nd
$ 1,421.0
411.6
0.2
156.0
$ 1,343.2
377.3
16.7
183.4
2012
3rd
$ 1,142.5
298.9
11.9
81.1
4th
Total
$ 1,080.3
278.5
0.7
75.4
$ 4,987.0
1,366.3
29.5
495.9
0.3
155.7
(0.2 )
183.6
0.2
80.9
0.1
75.3
0.4
495.5
$ 1.59
$ 1.88
$ 0.84
$ 0.79
$ 5.11
$ 1.58
$ 1.86
$ 0.83
$ 0.78
$ 5.07
Dividends per share
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.23
$ 0.92
Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters presented; therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings
per share may not equal the total computed for the year.
(1) Impairment and restructuring charges for the second quarter of 2013 included severance and related benefit costs of
$6.0 million, including pension settlement costs of $5.2 million, and exit costs of $0.7 million. Impairment and restructuring
charges for the third quarter of 2013 included severance and related benefit costs of $3.2 million, including pension settlement
costs of $1.5 million, and exit costs of $0.5 million. Impairment and restructuring charges for the fourth quarter of 2013 included
severance and related benefit costs of $6.0 million, including pension settlement costs of $0.4 million, impairment charges of
$0.7 million and a favorable adjustment for exit costs of $1.9 million.
(2) Separation costs of $13.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2013 related to the planned spinoff of the steel business.
(3) Net income for the fourth quarter of 2013 included a gain of $5.4 million on the sale of real estate in Brazil.
(4) Impairment and restructuring charges for the second quarter of 2012 included severance and related benefit costs of
$16.5 million, including a curtailment of pension benefits of $10.7 million, and exit costs of $0.2 million. Impairment and
restructuring charges for the third quarter of 2012 included impairment charges of $6.4 million, severance and related benefit
costs of $1.3 million and exit costs of $4.2 million.
(5) Net income for the second quarter of 2012 included CDSOA receipts of $109.5 million, net of expenses.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 89
89
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Timken Company and subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Timken Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of The Timken Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The
Timken Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992
framework) and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 28, 2014
90
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 90
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There have been no changes during the Company’s fourth quarter of 2013 in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of The Timken Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for the Company. Timken’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Timken management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment under COSO’s “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992 framework),”
management believes that, as of December 31, 2013, Timken’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.
On March 11, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Interlube Systems Ltd. (Interlube). On April 11, 2013, the Company
completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Smith Services, Inc. (Smith Services). On May 13, 2013, the Company
completed the acquisition of Hamilton Gear Ltd., d/b/a Standard Machine (Standard Machine). As permitted by SEC guidance,
the scope of Timken’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 did not include the internal
control over financial reporting of Interlube, Smith Services and Standard Machine. The results of Interlube, Smith Services and
Standard Machine are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning March 11, 2013, April 11, 2013, and
May 13, 2013, respectively. The total assets of Interlube, Smith Services and Standard Machine represented less than two percent,
collectively, of the Company’s total assets at December 31, 2013. Net sales of Interlube, Smith Services and Standard Machine
represented less than one percent, collectively, of the Company’s consolidated net sales for the year then ended and less than
one percent, collectively, of net income for the year then ended. The Company will include Interlube, Smith Services and Standard
Machine in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting assessment as of December 31, 2014.
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on our assessment of Timken’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which is presented below.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 91
91
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportFINANCIALS AND FOOTNOTES REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Timken Company and subsidiaries
We have audited The Timken Company and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based
on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Timken Company and subsidiaries’ management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, The Timken Company and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of The Timken Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2014, and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 28, 2014
92
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 92
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
Part III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Required information is set forth under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance” in the proxy statement filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 13,
2014, and is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the executive officers of the registrant is included in Part I
hereof. Information regarding the Company’s Audit Committee and its Audit Committee Financial Expert is set forth under the
caption “Audit Committee” in the proxy statement filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or
about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The General Policies and Procedures of the Board of Directors of the Company and the charters of its Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are also available on the Company’s website
at www.timken.com and are available to any shareholder upon request to the General Counsel. The information on the Company’s
website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its employees, including its principal executive officer, principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer, as well as its directors. The Company’s code of ethics, The Timken Company
Standards of Business Ethics Policy, is available on its website at www.timken.com. The Company intends to disclose any
amendment to, or waiver from, its code of ethics by posting such amendment or waiver, as applicable, on its website.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Required information is set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “2013 Summary Compensation
Table,” “2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2013 Year-End,” “2013 Option Exercises and Stock
Vested,” “Pension Benefits,” “2013 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-
in-Control,” “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Committee,” “Compensation Committee Report” in the proxy statement
filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Required information, including with respect to institutional investors owning more than 5% of the Company’s common shares,
is set forth under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock” in the proxy statement filed in connection with the annual
meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Required information is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the proxy statement filed in
connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Required information is set forth under the caption “Election of Directors” in the proxy statement issued in connection with the
annual meeting of shareholders to be held on or about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Required information regarding fees paid to and services provided by the Company’s independent auditor during the years ended
December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the pre-approval policies and procedures of the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board
of Directors is set forth under the caption “Auditors” in the proxy statement issued in connection with the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held on or about May 13, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 93
93
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportCONTROLS, REPORTS AND EXHIBITS Part IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) – Financial Statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) – Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is submitted as a separate section of this report. Schedules I, III, IV and V
are not applicable to the Company and, therefore, have been omitted.
(a)(3) Listing of Exhibits
Exhibit
(3.1)
(3.2)
(4.1)
(4.2)
(4.3)
(4.4)
(4.5)
(4.6)
(4.7)
(4.8)
(4.9)
Amended Articles of Incorporation of The Timken Company, (effective May 31, 2013) were filed on July 31, 2013 with Form
10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and are incorporated herein by reference.
Amended Regulations of The Timken Company adopted on February 14, 2014, were filed on February 14, 2014 with Form
8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and are incorporated herein by reference.
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2011, by and among: The Timken Company together
with certain of its subsidiaries as Guarantors; Bank of America, N.A. and KeyBank National Association as Co-Administrative
Agents; KeyBank National Association as Paying Agent, L/C Issuer and Swing Line Lender; and the other Lenders party
thereto, was filed on May 12, 2011 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver, dated as of November 6, 2013, by and among: The Timken Company,
together with certain of its subsidiaries as Guarantors; Bank of America, N.A. and KeyBank National Association as
Co-Administrative Agents and the other Lenders party thereto is attached hereto as Exhibit 4.1.
Indenture dated as of July 1, 1990, between The Timken Company and Ameritrust Company of New York, was filed with
Form S-3 dated July 12, 1990 (Registration No. 333-35773) and is incorporated herein by reference.
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 24, 1996, by and between The Timken Company and Mellon Bank, N.A. was
filed on November 13, 1996 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Indenture, dated as of February 18, 2003, between The Timken Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, providing
for Issuance of Notes in Series was filed on March 27, 2003 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2009, by and between The Timken Company and The Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor to The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly known as The Bank of New York)), was
filed on November 11, 2009 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company is also a party to agreements with respect to other long-term debt in total amount less than 10% of the
Registrant’s consolidated total assets. The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such agreements upon request.
Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among: Timken
Receivables Corporation; The Timken Corporation; the Purchasers from time to time parties thereto; SunTrust Bank and the
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch was filed on November 30, 2012 with Form 8-K (Commission File No.
1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2010, between The Timken
Corporation and Timken Receivables Corporation was filed on November 10, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No.
1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
(4.10)
Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2010, between MPB Corporation and Timken Receivables Corporation
was filed on November 10, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
94
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 94
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Management Contracts and Compensation Plans
Exhibit
(4.11)
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of November 30, 2012 between
The Timken Corporation and Timken Receivables Corporation was filed on November 30, 2012 with Form 8-K (Commission
File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
(4.12)
Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of November 30, 2012 between MPB Corporation and Timken
Receivables Corporation was filed on November 30, 2012 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10.1)
(10.2)
(10.3)
(10.4)
(10.5)
(10.6)
(10.7)
(10.8)
(10.9)
(10.10)
The Timken Company 1996 Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and other key employees, amended and restated
effective December 31, 2010, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
The Timken Company Director Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective December 31, 2008, was filed
on February 25, 2010 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of The Timken Company 1996 Deferred Compensation Plan Election Agreement, amended and restated as of January
1, 2008, was filed on February 25, 2010 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of The Timken Company Director Deferred Compensation Plan Election Agreement, amended and restated as of
January 1, 2008, was filed on February 25, 2010 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
The Timken Company Long-Term Incentive Plan for directors, officers and other key employees as amended and restated
as of February 5, 2008 and approved by the shareholders on May 1, 2008 was filed on March 18, 2008 as Appendix A
to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
The Timken Company 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan for directors, officers and other key employees as approved by the
shareholders on May 10, 2011 was filed on May 12, 2011 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Amended and Restated Supplemental Pension Plan of The Timken Company, amended and restated effective as of January
1, 2011, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Timken Company Senior Executive Management Performance Plan, as amended and restated as of February 8, 2010
and approved by shareholders May 11, 2010, was filed on May 12, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amended and Restated Severance Agreement (for Executive Officers appointed prior to January 1, 2011) was filed
on December 18, 2009 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Severance Agreement (for Executive Officers appointed on or after January 1, 2011 and other officers) as adopted
on December 9, 2010 was filed on February 22, 2011 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10.11) Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Severance Agreement (for Executive Officers appointed prior to January
1, 2011) as adopted on December 9, 2010 was filed on February 22, 2011 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and
is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.12)
(10.13)
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with all Directors who are not Executive Officers of the Company was filed
on July 31, 2013 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with all Executive Officers of the Company who are not Directors of the
Company was filed on July 31, 2013 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 95
95
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportCONTROLS, REPORTS AND EXHIBITS Management Contracts and Compensation Plans (continued)
Exhibit
(10.14)
(10.15)
(10.16)
(10.17)
(10.18)
(10.19)
(10.20)
(10.21)
(10.22)
(10.23)
(10.24)
(10.25)
(10.26)
(10.27)
(10.28)
(10.29)
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with all Executive Officers of the Company who are also Directors of the
Company was filed on July 31, 2013 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefits Agreement entered into with certain Executive Officers and
certain key employees of the Company, was filed on February 26, 2009 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefits Agreement entered into with the Chief Executive Officer and the
President of Steel, was filed on February 26, 2009 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
Form of Employee Excess Benefits Agreement, entered into with all Executive Officers after January 1, 2011, was filed on
August 4, 2011 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amendment No. 1 to The Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefit Agreement, entered into with certain
Executive Officers and certain key employees of the Company, was filed on September 2, 2009 with Form 8-K (Commission
File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amendment No. 1 to The Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefits Agreement with all Executive Officers
after January 1, 2011 and Form of Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Excess Benefits Agreement with certain
Executive Officers and certain key employees of the Company, as adopted December 8, 2011, was filed on February 17, 2012
with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amendment No. 1 to The Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefits Agreement entered into with the Chief
Executive Officer and the President of Steel, as adopted December 8, 2011, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Amendment No. 2 to The Amended and Restated Employee Excess Benefits Agreement entered into with the Chief
Executive Officer and the President of Steel, as adopted December 8, 2011, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for nontransferable options without dividend credit, as adopted on April 17,
2001, was filed on May 14, 2001 with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers, as adopted on January 31, 2005, was filed on February 4, 2005
with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, as adopted on January 31, 2005, was filed on
March 15, 2005 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers, as adopted on February 6, 2006, was filed on February 10, 2006
with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers, as adopted on November 6, 2008, was filed on February 26, 2009
with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Officers, as adopted on December 10, 2009, was filed on February 25,
2010 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, as adopted on December 8, 2011, was filed on
February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for transferable options for Officers, as adopted on December 8, 2011, was
filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
96
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 96
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Management Contracts and Compensation Plans (continued)
Exhibit
(10.30)
(10.31)
(10.32)
(10.33)
(10.34)
(10.35)
(10.36)
(10.37)
(10.38)
(10.39)
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for non-transferable options for Non-Officer Employees, as adopted on
December 8, 2011, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, as adopted on January 31, 2005, was filed on March 15,
2005 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Restricted Shares Agreement, as adopted on November 6, 2008, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, as adopted on December 8, 2011, was filed on February
17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Performance Unit Agreement, as adopted on February 4, 2008, was filed on February 7, 2008 with Form 8-K
(Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Performance Shares Agreement was filed on February 11, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Deferred Shares Agreement, as adopted on February 2, 2009, was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K
(Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Deferred Shares Agreement entered into with employees after January 1, 2012, as adopted on December 8, 2011,
was filed on February 17, 2012 with Form 10-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into with key employees was filed on May 2, 2012
with Form 10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into with key employees was filed on May 2, 2012 with Form
10-Q (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.40)
Form of Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Cliff Vesting) entered into with key employees is attached hereto as
Exhibit 10.1
(10.41)
Form of Associate Non-Compete Agreement entered into with key employees was filed on December 3, 2012 with Form
10-Q/A (Commission File No. 1-1169) and is incorporated herein by reference.
(12)
(21)
(23)
(24)
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
A list of subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Power of Attorney.
(31.1)
Principal Executive Officer’s Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2)
Principal Financial Officer’s Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32)
(101)
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Financial statements from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Timken Company for the year ended December 31, 2013,
formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 97
97
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportCONTROLS, REPORTS AND EXHIBITS SIGNATURES:
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
By: /s/ James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
Glenn A. Eisenberg
Executive Vice President – Finance
and Administration (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ J. Ted Mihaila
J. Ted Mihaila
Senior Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: February 28, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ John M. Ballbach*
John M. Ballbach, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Phillip R. Cox*
Phillip R. Cox, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Diane C. Creel*
Diane C. Creel, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Richard G. Kyle*
Richard G. Kyle, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ John A. Luke, Jr. *
John A. Luke, Jr., Director
Date: February 28, 2014
Christopher L. Mapes, Director
By: /s/ Joseph W. Ralston *
Joseph W. Ralston, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ John P. Reilly *
John P. Reilly, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Frank C. Sullivan*
Frank C. Sullivan, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ John M. Timken, Jr.*
John M. Timken, Jr., Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Ward J. Timken *
Ward J. Timken, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Ward J. Timken, Jr.*
Ward J. Timken, Jr., Director
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Jacqueline F. Woods*
Jacqueline F. Woods, Director
Date: February 28, 2014
* By: /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
Glenn A. Eisenberg, attorney-in-fact
By authority of Power of Attorney
filed as Exhibit 24 hereto
Date: February 28, 2014
98
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 98
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Allowance for uncollectible accounts:
Balance at Beginning of Period
Additions:
Charged to Costs and Expenses (1)
Charged to Other Accounts (2)
Deductions (3)
Balance at End of Period
Allowance for surplus and obsolete inventory:
Balance at Beginning of Period
Additions:
Charged to Costs and Expenses (4)
Charged to Other Accounts (2)
Deductions (5)
Balance at End of Period
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets:
Balance at Beginning of Period
Additions
Charged to Costs and Expenses (6)
Charged to Other Accounts (7)
Deductions (8)
Balance at End of Period
2013
2012
2011
$ 12.1
$ 19.0
$ 27.6
1.5
—
3.3
7.6
(0.6 )
13.9
14.4
(2.5 )
20.5
$ 10.3
$ 12.1
$ 19.0
2013
2012
2011
$ 21.4
$ 30.9
$ 30.8
11.2
0.2
12.5
10.8
1.2
21.5
12.2
5.2
17.3
$ 20.3
$ 21.4
$ 30.9
2013
2012
2011
$ 183.9
$ 179.7
$ 174.9
32.1
(4.2 )
15.9
13.8
13.8
23.4
22.6
(3.9 )
13.9
$ 195.9
$ 183.9
$ 179.7
(1) Provision for uncollectible accounts included in expenses.
(2) Currency translation and change in reserves due to acquisitions, net of divestitures.
(3) Actual accounts written off against the allowance—net of recoveries.
(4) Provisions for surplus and obsolete inventory included in expenses.
(5) Inventory items written off against the allowance.
(6) Increase in valuation allowance is recorded as a component of the provision for income taxes.
(7) Includes valuation allowances recorded against other comprehensive income/loss or goodwill.
(8) Amount primarily relates to the reversal of valuation allowances due to the realization of net operating loss carryforwards.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 99
99
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportCONTROLS, REPORTS AND EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 31.1
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James W. Griffith, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Timken Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f ) and 15d-15(f )) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 100
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report EXHIBIT 31.2
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Glenn A. Eisenberg, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Timken Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f ) and 15d-15(f )) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
Glenn A. Eisenberg
Executive Vice President –
Finance and Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 101
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual ReportCONTROLS, REPORTS AND EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of The Timken Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer’s knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
Date: February 28, 2014
By: /s/ James W. Griffith
James W. Griffith
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By: /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
Glenn A. Eisenberg
Executive Vice President-
Finance and Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Timken 2013 AR_financial_3-10-14.indd 102
3/10/14 6:46 PM
2013 Timken Annual Report Officers and Executives
Shareholder Information
Corporate Offices
The Timken Company
1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W.
Canton, OH 44706-2798
Telephone: 330-438-3000
Website: www.timken.com
Stock Listing
Timken shares are traded on the
New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol TKR.
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 13, 2014, 10 a.m.
Timken Corporate Offices
Please direct meeting inquiries to
William Burkhart
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Phone: 330-471-3002.
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Huntington Building
Suite 1300
925 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44115-1476
Publications
The Annual Meeting Notice and Proxy
Card are mailed to shareholders in March.
Copies of the Annual Report, Proxy
Statement, Forms 10-K and 10-Q may be
obtained from the company’s website,
www.timken.com/investors, or by written
request at no charge from:
The Timken Company
Shareholder Relations, GNE-12
P.O. Box 6928
Canton, OH 44706-0928
Shareholder Information
Dividends on common shares are
generally payable in March, June,
September and December.
The Timken Company offers an open
enrollment dividend reinvestment and
stock purchase plan through its transfer
agent Wells Fargo. This program allows
current shareholders and new investors
the opportunity to purchase common
shares without a broker.
Shareholders of record may increase their
investment in the company by reinvesting
their dividends at no cost. Shares held in
the name of a broker must be transferred
to the shareholder’s name to permit
reinvestment. Information and
enrollment materials are available
online or by contacting Wells Fargo.
Inquiries regarding dividend
reinvestment, dividend payments,
change of address or lost certificates
should be directed to:
Wells Fargo Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64874
St. Paul, MN 55164-0856
Phone: 800-468-9716 or 651-450-4064
Wells Fargo Shareowner Services
website: www.shareowneronline.com
Investor Relations
Steve Tschiegg
Director – Capital Markets
and Investor Relations
The Timken Company
1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W.
Canton, OH 44706-0928
Telephone: 330-471-7446
e-mail: steve.tschiegg@timken.com
The Timken team applies their know-how to improve the reliability and performance of machinery in diverse
markets worldwide. The company designs, makes and markets high-performance steel as well as mechanical
components, including bearings, gears, chain and related mechanical power transmission products and services.
www.timken.com
8.5M 03-14:05 Order No. 10685 I Timken® is a registered trademark of The Timken Company. I © 2014 The Timken Company I Printed in U.S.A.