US Foods Annual Report 2019

FY2019 Annual Report · US Foods

Loading PDF…

ANNUAL
REPORT
2019

TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:

At US Foods®, our promise is to help customers Make It
by providing the innovative products and easy-to-use
technology they need to succeed.

In 2019, we continued to execute on our GREAT FOOD.
MADE EASY.™ strategy, while delivering strong financial
performance and positioning ourselves for long-term
success. We also closed the acquisition of the Food
Group of Companies (the Food Group), expanding our
footprint in the northwest and west regions of the United
States and enhancing our produce, center-of-the-plate
and logistics capabilities.

FISCAL 2019 HIGHLIGHTS

Our full-year financial highlights included:

• Delivered net sales of $25.9 billion and increased

•

gross profit by 6.5%
Increased independent restaurant case volume by
7.1%, including 4.4% organic case volume growth

• Expanded operating leverage by growing gross
profit dollars faster than operating expenses for
the fourth consecutive year, resulting in operating
income growth of 6.2% and Adjusted EBITDA
growth of 8.3%

• Grew operating cash flow by approximately 25%

OUR STRATEGY

Our GREAT FOOD. MADE EASY. differentiation strategy
continues to set us apart in the marketplace. It’s a strategy
that is grounded in an understanding of our customers and
driven by our commitment to help them solve their most
pressing business challenges.

We’ve also continued to build out our multi-channel
strategy to meet customers’ evolving preferences. To
address the growing demand for specialty items, our
US Foods Direct™ online ordering platform offers more
than 30,000 specialty products shipped directly to
operators, in addition to what we carry in our warehouses.
US Foods Pronto™, which lets restaurant operators receive
smaller orders more frequently, is now active in eight
markets. We also operate six CHEF’STORE® locations
to serve customers looking for a cash and carry option.

US Foods CHECK®, our portfolio of value-added
services, helps operators tackle common pain points
like menu design, labor scheduling and inventory
management. In 2019, the number of unique customers
using our value-added services increased by 24%, the
third consecutive year of more than 20% growth.

DELIVERING WITH EXCELLENCE

To ensure our strategy is supported by strong execution,
we continue to make progress on our continuous
improvement journey to find more effective and
efficient practices. We now have a team of continuous
improvement professionals deployed to our facilities to
help embed continuous improvement into our culture and
engage associates in helping to remove waste from our
day-to-day processes.

Additionally, the integration of the Food Group is off to a
strong start. We created a sixth region to accommodate
our expanded footprint in the Pacific Northwest,
completed rebranding of 10 facilities and more than 500
tractors and trailers and continue to integrate systems
and processes.

GREAT FOOD

THE YEAR AHEAD

Keeping a menu fresh is challenging, and customers count
on US Foods for new, innovative products that will help
them attract diners. The cornerstone of this offering is
Scoop™, a platform that introduces timesaving, on-trend
products multiple times a year. The program continues to
resonate with our customers, driving 21% higher basket
sizes and 13% higher retention rates. A growing part
of Scoop is our Serve Good® program, which features
more than 500 products that are responsibly sourced or
contribute to waste reduction and help operators keep up
with changing diner demands.

Private brands as a percentage of our total sales grew
by 70 basis points in 2019, our fourth consecutive
year of significant private brand expansion. Private
brand sales now comprise more than 35% of our total
revenue, providing us with significant opportunity for
continued expansion.

MADE EASY

The Made Easy part of our strategy is all about making
it easy for our customers to do business with US Foods
and making it easier for them to run their businesses. Our
e-commerce and mobile technology solutions continue
to lead the industry with more than 70% of our sales
revenue coming through our e-commerce platform.

There are many reasons for optimism in 2020. We expect
to continue to profitably grow with our target customers,
particularly independent restaurants, healthcare and
hospitality, while driving increased sales of our private
brand products. We remain focused on increasing
operational efficiency and are on track to realize expected
synergies from integrating the Food Group.

Recognizing the role corporate social responsibility plays
in our business and culture, we are also proud to publish
our first detailed corporate social responsibility report,
giving all our stakeholders a more complete view into our
commitment to People, Planet and Products. You can read
the report on our website at www.usfoods.com/csr.

As always, we owe our success to the more than 28,000
associates who deliver their best each day. It’s their
collective talent and commitment that drives us forward
and that helps our customers Make It.

Pietro Satriano
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

U S F O O D S A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 9

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2019
OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 001-37786

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

26-0347906

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

9399 W. Higgins Road, Suite 100
Rosemont, IL 60018
(847) 720-8000
(Address, including Zip Code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

USFD

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.

Large accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes

As of June 28, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock
held by non-affiliates was $7.8 billion (based on the reported closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on such date on the New York Stock Exchange). 219,858,531
shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding as of February 7, 2020.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, relating to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 13, 2020, are incorporated herein by reference for purposes of Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than
120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 28, 2019.

US Foods Holding Corp.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

PART I.

Item 1.

Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 2.

Properties

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer

Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Item 9B. Other Information

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

Signatures

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Basis of Presentation

We operate on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, with all periods ending on a Saturday. When a 53-week fiscal year occurs, we report the
additional week in the fiscal fourth quarter. The fiscal years ended December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017,
December 31, 2016 and January 2, 2016 are also referred to herein as fiscal years 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our
fiscal years 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 52-week fiscal years. Our fiscal year 2015 was a 53-week fiscal year. Fiscal year 2020 will
be a 53-week fiscal year.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) which are not historical in nature are “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements often include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “project,” “anticipate,”
“intend,” “plan,” “outlook,” “estimate,” “target,” “seek,” “will,” “may,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “forecast,” “mission,” “strive,”
“more,” “goal,” or similar expressions and are based upon various assumptions and our experience in the industry, as well as historical
trends, current conditions, and expected future developments. However, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees
of performance or results, and there are a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, among others, the risks, uncertainties, and other
factors set forth in Item 1A of Part I, “Risk Factors,” and Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations,” of this Annual Report.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and other important factors, the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report might not prove
to be accurate, and you should not place undue reliance on them. All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or others acting on
our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. All of these statements speak only as of the date
made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether because of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Comparisons of results between current and prior periods are not intended to express any future trends, or indications of future performance,
unless expressed as such, and should be viewed only as historical data.

Item 1.

Business

PART I

US Foods Holding Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to in this Annual Report as “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” or
“US Foods.” US Foods Holding Corp. conducts all of its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary US Foods, Inc. (“USF”) and
its subsidiaries.

Our Company

We are among America’s great food companies and leading foodservice distributors. Built through organic growth and acquisitions, we
trace our roots back over 150 years to a number of heritage companies with rich legacies in food innovation and customer service. These
include Monarch Foods (established in 1853), Sexton (1883), PYA (1903), Rykoff (1911) and Kraft Foodservice (1976). US Foodservice
was organized as a corporation in Delaware in 1989. In November 2011, we rebranded from “US Foodservice” to “US Foods.”

Our mission is to be First In Food. We strive to inspire and empower chefs and foodservice operators to bring great food experiences to
consumers. This mission is supported by our strategy of GREAT FOOD. MADE EASY.™, which is centered on providing customers with
the innovative products and technology solutions they need to operate their businesses profitably. We operate as one business with
standardized business processes, shared systems infrastructure, and an organizational model that optimizes national scale with local
execution, allowing us to manage the business as a single operating segment. We have centralized activities where scale matters and our
local field structure focuses on customer facing activities.

We supply approximately 300,000 customer locations nationwide. These customer locations include independently owned single and
multi-unit restaurants, regional restaurant chains, national restaurant chains, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels and motels, country clubs,
government and military organizations, colleges and universities, and retail locations. We provide more than 400,000 fresh, frozen, and
dry food stock-keeping units, or SKUs, as well as non-food items, sourced from approximately 6,000 suppliers. Approximately 4,000
sales associates manage customer relationships at local, regional, and national levels. They are supported by sophisticated marketing and
category management capabilities, as well as a sales support team that includes world-class chefs and restaurant operations consultants,
new business development managers and others that help us provide more comprehensive service to our customers. Our extensive network
of more than 70 distribution facilities and fleet of approximately 7,000 trucks allow us to operate efficiently and provide high levels of
customer service. This operating model allows us to leverage our nationwide scale and footprint while executing locally.

Our Industry

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry has a large number of companies competing in the space, including local, regional, and
national foodservice distributors. Foodservice distributors typically fall into three categories, representing differences in customer
focus, product offering, and supply chain:

•

Broadline distributors which offer a “broad line” of products and services;

System distributors which carry products specified for large chains; and

Specialized distributors which primarily focus on specific product categories (e.g., meat or produce) or customer types.

Given our mix of products and services, we are considered a broadline distributor. A number of adjacent competitors also serve the U.S.
foodservice distribution industry, including cash-and-carry retailers, commercial wholesale outlets, warehouse clubs, commercial website
outlets, and grocery stores. Customer buying decisions are based on the assortment of product offered, quality, price, and service levels.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry serves different customer types of varying sizes, growth profiles, and product and service
requirements, including independent restaurants, healthcare customers (such as hospital systems, nursing homes and long-term care
facilities), hospitality customers (ranging from large hotel chains to local banquet halls, country clubs, casinos and entertainment
complexes), regional and national restaurant chains, colleges and universities, K-12 schools, and retail locations. Our target customer
types—independent restaurants, healthcare and hospitality—value foodservice distributors with a broad product offering and value-added
services that help them drive efficiency in their operations. As described in more detail below, our GREAT FOOD. MADE EASY. strategy
resonates with these types of customers, and for this reason, we believe our growth prospects with these customers are greater than with
other customer types.

In fiscal year 2019, no single customer represented more than 3% of our total customer sales. Sales to our top 50 customers represented
approximately 43% of our net sales in fiscal year 2019.

We have entered into contractual relationships with certain group purchasing organizations ("GPOs") that negotiate pricing, delivery and
other terms on behalf of their members. In fiscal year 2019, GPO members accounted for approximately 25% of our net sales. GPO
members are primarily comprised of customers in the healthcare, hospitality, education, and government/military industries.

There are several important dynamics affecting the industry, including:

•

Evolving consumer tastes and preferences. Consumers demand healthy and authentic food alternatives with fewer artificial
ingredients, and they value locally-harvested and sustainably-manufactured products. In addition, many ethnic food offerings
are becoming more mainstream as consumers show a greater willingness to try new flavors and cuisines. Changes in consumer
preferences create opportunities for new and innovative products and for unique food-away-from-home destinations. This,
in turn, is expected to create growth, expand margins, and produce better customer retention opportunities for those distributors
with the flexibility to balance national scale and local preferences. We believe foodservice distributors will need broader
product assortments, extended supplier networks, effective supply chain management capabilities, and strong food safety
and quality programs to meet these needs.

Generational shifts with millennials and baby boomers. Given their purchasing power and diverse taste profiles, millennials
and baby boomers will continue to significantly influence food consumption and the food-away-from-home market. According
to a U.S. Census Bureau survey, there were 83 million individuals born between 1982 and 2000 in the U.S., making millennials
the largest demographic cohort. When it comes to food, millennials are open-minded and curious, and willing to seek out
new flavors, dining experiences and diverse menu offerings, while also demanding customization, convenience and
sustainable products. Independent restaurants are uniquely situated to capitalize on these preferences. As millennials’
disposable income increases, we believe this demographic will be key to driving growth in the broader U.S. food industry.
We also expect that baby boomers will continue to shape the industry as they remain in the workplace longer, which is
expected to prolong their contribution to food-away-from-home expenditures.

Growing importance of technology. We see significant future growth being driven by the increased utilization of and reliance
on technology by foodservice distributors, customers (in particular, independent restaurants) and diners. E-commerce
solutions streamline the purchasing process and increase customer retention. They also deepen the relationship between
foodservice distributors and customers, creating personalized insights and services that can make both more efficient. We
believe foodservice distributors with deeper, technology-enabled relationships with customers are better able to accelerate
their customers’ adoption of new products and increase customer loyalty, giving them a competitive edge. Technology is also
growing in importance and helping to level the playing field for independent restaurants. Mobile food delivery and social
media apps make independent restaurants more competitive with larger restaurant chains, and help this customer type attract
more diners at a relatively low cost. We believe these technology trends will accelerate, as millennials and Generation Z
place a greater reliance on technology and become key influencers and decision-makers within the food industry, including
at the customer level. Consequently, we believe foodservice distributors which are focused on strengthening their technology,
data analytics, and related capabilities will be well-positioned to capitalize on these trends.

We believe that we have the scale, foresight and agility required to proactively address these trends and, in turn, benefit from higher sales
growth, greater customer retention, increased private label penetration, and improved profitability.

Our Business Strategy

Our GREAT FOOD. MADE EASY. strategy is built on three key differentiators: product innovation, technology and team-based selling.
Through this strategy, we serve our customers as consultants and business partners, bringing our customers personalized solutions and
tailoring a suite of products and services to fit each customer’s needs.

The GREAT FOOD portion of our strategy is anchored by Scoop™, a program that introduces innovative and on-trend products multiple
times a year, helping our customers keep their menus fresh and delivering back-of-house convenience to reduce their labor and food
costs. A growing part of our Scoop portfolio is our Serve Good® program. The Serve Good program features more than 500 products
that are sustainably-sourced or contribute to waste reduction. Our private brand portfolio is guided by a spirit of innovation and a
commitment to delivering superior quality products and value to customers. While we offer products under a spectrum of private brands,
and at different price points, all are designed to deliver quality, performance and value to our customers.

MADE EASY is aimed at providing restaurant operators with technology and expertise that make it easier to transact with us and run their
businesses. Our mobile technology platform provides customers with a personalized e-commerce ordering experience and easy-to-use
business analytics tools. Our portfolio of value-added services helps customers address key pain points like food waste, back-of-house
operations and diner traffic. By delivering our products and services through a differentiated team-based selling approach, we provide
customers access to a diverse team of experts including chefs, center of the plate and produce specialists and restaurant operations
consultants. Customers utilizing these solutions tend to purchase more and have stronger commercial relationships with us.

Building upon a strategy of making it easier for our customers, we deliver to our customers through multiple channels. US Foods Direct™,
an online ordering platform, more than doubles our product assortment and provides customers with access to thousands of specialty
products which ship directly to them from the supplier. More recently, we expanded our US Foods Pronto™ service in select markets to
let restaurant operators receive smaller orders more frequently. We are also adding Chef’Store® locations (two new stores were added
in 2018 and one new store is planned to open in 2020) to provide more customers with a retail option in between deliveries and to cost
effectively service more price-conscious customers.

We believe our GREAT FOOD. MADE EASY. differentiation strategy will enable us to reach more customers and create deeper relationships
with existing ones, particularly within our target customer types—independent restaurants, healthcare, and hospitality—and drive
increased penetration of our private brand products. Further, we believe this strategy positions us to make the most of the continued
growth in food-away-from-home consumption and consumer preferences for innovative, on-trend flavors.

This strategy is supported by our commitment to DELIVERING WITH EXCELLENCE, which ensures that our execution is as strong
as our strategy. Recently, actions taken to support this commitment have included:

• Completing the centralization of our replenishment function, which was designed to improve our service platform and gross

profit over time;
Improving on-time delivery to customers, while also taking steps to reduce the number of miles driven to serve customers; and

•
• Mitigating the impacts of higher freight costs through improved freight management.

We have also invested in embedding continuous improvement in our operations to increase consistency and efficiency and to engage
employees in improving our day-to-day processes.

Acquisitions have also historically played an important role in supporting the execution of our growth strategy. In September 2019, we
completed the acquisition of five foodservice companies (the “Food Group”) from Services Group of America, Inc.: Food Services of
America, Inc., Systems Services of America, Inc., Amerifresh, Inc., Ameristar Meats, Inc. and GAMPAC Express, Inc. for $1.8 billion.
The acquisition of the Food Group expands the Company’s network in the West and Northwest parts of the U.S. Integrating the Food
Group and realizing synergies from the acquisition will be key priorities for the Company. While we prioritize deleveraging following
the completion of the Food Group acquisition, we intend to selectively pursue acquisition opportunities and primarily focus our investments
on transactions aligned with our strategic priorities.

Products and Brands

We have a broad assortment of products and brands designed to meet customers’ needs. In many categories, we offer products under a
spectrum of private brands based on price and quality covering a range of values and qualities.

The table below presents the sales mix for our principal product categories for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Meats and seafood

Dry grocery products

Refrigerated and frozen grocery products

Dairy

Equipment, disposables and supplies

Beverage products

Produce

2019

Fiscal Years
2018

(in millions)

2017

9,313

8,635

4,427
4,253

2,685

2,483

1,403

1,375

4,239
3,898

2,520

2,298

1,315

1,270

8,692

4,266
3,799

2,533

2,243

1,306

1,308

25,939

24,175

24,147

We have registered the trademarks US Foods®, Food Fanatics® and Chef’Store® as part of our overall brand strategy and our retail outlets.
We have also registered or applied for trademark protection in the U.S. for our private brands. These trademarks and our private brands
are widely recognized within the U.S. foodservice industry. Our U.S. trademarks are effective as long as they are in use and their
registrations are properly maintained. We do not have any patents or licenses that are material to our business.

Suppliers

We purchase from approximately 6,000 individual suppliers, none of which accounted for more than 5% of our aggregate purchases in
fiscal year 2019. Our suppliers generally are large corporations selling national brand name and private brand products. Additionally,
regional and local suppliers support targeted geographic initiatives and private label programs requiring regional and local distribution.
4

Seasonality

Our business does not fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and, as a result, is not considered seasonal.

Working Capital Practices

Our operations and strategic initiatives require continuing capital investment, and our resources include cash provided by operations, as
well as access to capital from bank borrowings and other types of debt and financing arrangements. See the discussion in Item 7 of Part
II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Government Regulation

As a marketer and distributor of food products, we are subject to various laws and regulations. A summary of some of these laws and
regulations is provided below.

Food Handling and Processing

We are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the manufacturing, handling, storage, transportation, sale and labeling of food
products, including the applicable provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Bioterrorism Act, Food Safety Modernization
Act, Federal Meat Inspection Act, Poultry Products Inspection Act, Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, Country of Origin Labeling
Act, and regulations issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”).

Our distribution facilities must be registered with the FDA and are subject to periodic government agency inspections by federal and/or
state authorities. We have a number of processing facilities for certain meat, poultry, seafood and produce products. These units are
registered and inspected by the USDA (with respect to meat and poultry) and the FDA (with respect to produce and seafood) as applicable.

We also distribute a variety of non-food products, such as food containers, kitchen equipment and cleaning materials, and are subject to
various laws and regulations relating to the storage, transportation, distribution, sale and labeling of those non-food products, including
requirements to provide information about the hazards of certain chemicals present in some of the products we distribute.

Our customers include several departments of the U.S. federal government, as well as certain state and local governmental entities. These
customer relationships subject us to additional regulations that are applicable to government contractors. For example, as a U.S. federal
government contractor, we are subject to audit by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.

Employment

The U.S. Department of Labor and its agencies, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, regulate our employment practices and standards for workers.
We are also subject to laws that prohibit discrimination in employment based on non-merit categories, including Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and other laws relating to accessibility. Our workers’ compensation self-insurance
is subject to regulation by the jurisdictions in which we operate.

Our facilities are subject to inspections under the Occupational Safety and Health Act related to our compliance with certain manufacturing,
health and safety standards to protect our employees from accidents. We are also subject to the National Labor Relations Act, which
governs the process for collective bargaining between employers and employees and protects the rights of both employers and employees
in the workplace.

Trade

For the purchase of products produced, harvested or manufactured outside of the U.S., and for the shipment of products to customers
located outside of the U.S., we are subject to certain reporting requirements and applicable customs laws regarding the import and export
of various products.

Ground Transportation

The U.S. Department of Transportation and its agencies, the Surface Transportation Board, the Federal Highway Administration, the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, regulate our fleet operations
through the regulation of operations, safety, insurance and hazardous materials. We must comply with the regulations promulgated by
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing and hours of service for our drivers.
Matters such as weight and dimension of equipment also fall under U.S. federal and state regulations.

Environmental

Our operations are subject to a broad range of U.S. federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, as well as zoning and
building regulations. Environmental laws and regulations cover a variety of procedures, including appropriately managing wastewater
and stormwater; complying with clean air laws, including those governing vehicle emissions; properly handling and disposing of solid
and hazardous wastes; protecting against and appropriately investigating and remediating spills and releases; and monitoring and
maintaining underground and aboveground storage tanks for diesel fuel and other petroleum products.

Anticorruption

Because we are organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and our principal place of business is in the U.S., we are considered
a “domestic concern” under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and are covered by its anti-bribery provisions.

Employees

We had approximately 28,000 employees as of December 28, 2019, substantially all of which were full-time employees. Approximately
5,000 employees were members of local unions associated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and other labor organizations.
Approximately one-third of our distribution facilities have employees represented by these local unions and are covered by collective
bargaining agreements (“CBAs”).

During fiscal year 2019, 13 CBAs covering approximately 1,300 employees were renegotiated. During fiscal year 2020, 14 CBAs covering
approximately 1,400 employees will be subject to renegotiation. While we have experienced work stoppages from time to time in the
past, we generally believe we have good relations with both our union and non-union employees, and we strive to be a well-regarded
employer in the communities in which we operate.

Information about our Executive Officers

Name
Pietro Satriano

Dirk J. Locascio

Kristin M. Coleman

Steven M. Guberman

Andrew E. Iacobucci

Jay A. Kvasnicka

David A. Rickard

Keith D. Rohland

David Works

Age
57

Position
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer

Executive Vice President, Nationally Managed Business

Chief Merchandising Officer

Executive Vice President, Locally Managed Business and Field Operations

Executive Vice President, Strategy, Insights and Financial Planning

Chief Information Officer

Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

Mr. Satriano has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of US Foods since July 2015. In December 2017, Mr. Satriano was
elected Chairman of the Board of Directors. From February 2011 to July 2015, Mr. Satriano served as our Chief Merchandising Officer.
Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Satriano was President of LoyaltyOne Canada, a provider of loyalty marketing and programs, from 2009
to 2011. From 2002 to 2008, he served in a number of leadership positions at Loblaw Companies Limited, a Canadian grocery retailer
and wholesale food distributor, including Executive Vice President, Loblaw Brands, and Executive Vice President, Food Segment.
Mr. Satriano began his career in strategy consulting, first in Toronto, Canada with Canada Consulting Group and then in Milan, Italy
with the Monitor Company. Mr. Satriano currently serves on the board of directors of CarMax, Inc.

Mr. Locascio has served as Chief Financial Officer since February 2017. Mr. Locascio served the Company as Senior Vice President,
Financial Accounting and Analysis from November 2016 to February 2017, Senior Vice President, Operations Finance and Financial
Planning from May 2015 to November 2016, and Senior Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis from May 2013 to May 2015.
Mr. Locascio joined US Foods in June 2009 as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Locascio held
senior finance roles with United Airlines, a global airline, and Arthur Andersen LLP, a public accounting firm.

Ms. Coleman has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer since February 2017. Prior to
joining US Foods, Ms. Coleman served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Sears Holdings Corporation,
a retailer, beginning in July 2014. Prior to joining Sears, she served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of

Brunswick Corporation, a manufacturing company, from May 2009 to July 2014. Before moving in-house, she worked in private practice
with Sidley Austin LLP.

Mr. Guberman has served as Executive Vice President, Nationally Managed Business since August 2016. Mr. Guberman served the
Company as Chief Merchandising Officer from July 2015 to January 2017, Senior Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing
Operations from January 2012 to July 2015 and Division President from August 2004 to December 2012. Mr. Guberman joined US Foods
in 1991, originally as part of Kraft/Alliant Foodservice.

Mr. Iacobucci has served as Chief Merchandising Officer since January 2017. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Iacobucci served as Executive
Vice President, Merchandising of Ahold USA, Inc., a food retailer, from April 2016 to January 2017. Prior to joining Ahold, he served
from February 2012 to November 2015 in several senior roles at Loblaw Companies Limited, a Canadian grocery retailer and wholesale
food distributor, including President, Discount Division.

Mr. Kvasnicka has served as Executive Vice President, Locally Managed Business and Field Operations since September 2016. Mr.
Kvasnicka has also served the Company as Interim Chief Supply Chain Officer since October 2019. Mr. Kvasnicka served the Company
as Executive Vice President, Locally Managed Sales from August 2015 to September 2016, Region President from April 2013 to July
2015 and Division President from October 2011 to March 2013. Mr. Kvasnicka served the Company as Vice President of Sales for the
Stock Yards division, President of the Stock Yards division and in various other roles between 2005 and 2011. He was Vice President of
Sales for the Minneapolis Division from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Kvasnicka joined US Foods in 1995, originally as part of Alliant Foodservice.

Mr. Rickard has served as Executive Vice President, Strategy, Insights and Financial Planning since February 2019. Mr. Rickard served
the Company as Executive Vice President, Strategy and Revenue Management from November 2015 to February 2019. Prior to joining
US Foods, Mr. Rickard served from March 2014 to November 2015 as Vice President of Uline Corporation, a distributor of shipping,
industrial, and packing materials, and was responsible for identifying, leading and implementing improvement initiatives across all aspects
of the organization. From September 1997 to March 2014, Mr. Rickard was Partner and Managing Director at the Boston Consulting
Group, a consulting firm. Mr. Rickard began his career with Charles River Associates, an economic consulting firm.

Mr. Rohland has served as Chief Information Officer since April 2011. Prior to joining US Foods, Mr. Rohland served in several leadership
positions at Citigroup, Inc., an investment bank and financial services provider, from March 2007 to April 2011, including Managing
Director of Risk and Program Management. Prior to joining Citigroup, Mr. Rohland was Chief Information Officer of Volvo Car
Corporation of Sweden, an automaker, from November 2005 to March 2007 and held a number of leadership positions at Ford Motor
Company, also an automaker, from July 1990 to November 2005.

Mr. Works has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since February 2018. Prior to joining US Foods,
Mr. Works served as Chief Human Resources Officer of Hackensack Meridian Health, an integrated health care network, beginning in
July 2017. Prior to joining Hackensack, he served as President - Enterprise of Windstream Holdings, Inc., a voice and data
communications provider, from December 2014 to August 2016, Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of
Windstream from February 2012 to December 2014, and Senior Vice President and President, Talent and Human Capital Services of
Sears Holdings Corporation, a retailer, from September 2009 to January 2012.

Website and Availability of Information

Our corporate website is located at www.usfoods.com. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our filings with the SEC are available to the public on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov. Those filings are also available to the public on, or accessible through, our corporate website for free via the “Investors”
section at ir.usfoods.com/investors. The information contained on or accessible through our corporate website or any other website that
we may maintain is not incorporated by reference into and is not part of this Annual Report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are subject to many risks and uncertainties. Some of these risks and uncertainties, including those described below, may cause our
business, financial condition and results of operations to vary, and they may materially or adversely affect our financial performance.
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Other risks and uncertainties, which are not currently known
to us or which we currently believe are immaterial, may also materially or adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

Our business is a low-margin business, and our profitability is directly affected by cost deflation or inflation, commodity volatility
and other factors.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is characterized by relatively high inventory turnover with relatively low profit margins.
Volatile commodity costs have a direct impact on our industry. We make a significant portion of our sales at prices that are based on the
cost of products we sell, plus a margin percentage or markup. As a result, our profit levels may be negatively affected during periods of
product cost deflation, even though our gross profit percentage may remain relatively constant. Prolonged periods of product cost inflation
also may reduce our profit margins and earnings if product cost increases cannot be passed on to customers because they resist paying
higher prices. In addition, periods of rapid inflation may have a negative effect on our business. There may be a lag between the time of
the price increase and the time at which we are able to pass it along to customers, as well as the impact it may have on discretionary
spending by consumers.

Competition in our industry is intense, and we may not be able to compete successfully.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is highly competitive, with national, multi-regional, regional and local distributors and specialty
competitors. Regional and local companies often align themselves with other smaller distributors through purchasing cooperatives and
marketing groups, with the goal of enhancing their geographic reach, private label offerings, overall purchasing power, cost efficiencies,
and ability to meet customer distribution requirements. These distributors may also rely on local presence as a source of competitive
advantage, and they may have lower costs and other competitive advantages due to geographic proximity. Additionally, adjacent
competition, such as cash-and-carry operations, commercial wholesale outlets, warehouse clubs and grocery stores, continue to serve the
commercial foodservice market. We also experience competition from online direct food wholesalers and retailers. We generally do not
have exclusive service agreements with our customers, and they may switch to other suppliers that offer lower prices or differentiated
products or customer service. The cost of switching suppliers is very low, as are the barriers to entry into the U.S. foodservice distribution
industry. We believe most purchasing decisions in the U.S. foodservice distribution industry are based on the type, quality and price of
the product, plus a distributor’s ability to completely and accurately fill orders and provide timely deliveries.

Increased competition has caused the U.S. foodservice distribution industry to change as distributors seek to lower costs, further increasing
pressure on the industry’s profit margins. Heightened competition among our suppliers, significant pricing initiatives and discount
programs established by competitors, new entrants, and trends toward consolidation and vertical integration could create additional
competitive pressures that reduce margins and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We rely on third party suppliers, and our business may be affected by interruption of supplies or increases in product costs.

We obtain most of our foodservice and related products from third party suppliers. We typically do not have long-term contracts with
suppliers. Although our purchasing volume can provide an advantage when dealing with suppliers, suppliers may not provide the
foodservice products and supplies we need in the quantities and at the time and prices requested. We do not control the actual production
of most of the products we sell. This means we are also subject to delays caused by interruption in production and increases in product
costs based on actions and conditions outside our control. These actions and conditions include changes in supplier pricing practices
(including promotional allowances); work slowdowns, work interruptions, strikes or other job actions by employees of suppliers; severe
weather and climate conditions; crop conditions; outbreak of food-borne illnesses; product recalls; transportation interruptions;
unavailability of fuel or increases in fuel costs; competitive demands; and natural disasters, terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events.
Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of foodservice and related products because of any of these or other factors could mean that we
could not fulfill our obligations to our customers and, as a result, our customers may turn to other distributors.

Our relationships with our customers and GPOs may be materially diminished, terminated or otherwise changed, which may adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Most of our customers buy from us pursuant to individual purchase orders, and we often do not enter into long-term agreements with
these customers. Because these customers are not contractually obligated to continue purchasing products from us, we cannot be assured
that the volume and/or number of our customers’ purchase orders will remain consistent or increase or that we will be able to maintain
our existing customer base.

Further, some of our customers purchase their products under arrangements with GPOs. GPOs act as agents on behalf of their members
by negotiating pricing, delivery, and other terms with us. Our customers who are members of GPOs purchase products directly from us
on the terms negotiated by their GPO. GPOs use the combined purchasing power of their members to negotiate more favorable prices
than their members would typically be able to negotiate on their own, and we have experienced some pricing pressure from customers
which associate themselves with a GPO. While no single customer represented more than 3% of our total net sales in fiscal year 2019,
approximately 25% of our net sales in fiscal year 2019 were made to customers under terms negotiated by GPOs (including approximately
13% of our net sales in fiscal year 2019 that were made to customers that are members of one GPO). If an independent restaurant customer
becomes a member of a GPO that has a contract with us, we may be forced to lower our prices to that customer, which would negatively
impact our operating margin. In addition, if we are unable to maintain our relationships with GPOs, or if GPOs are able to negotiate more
favorable terms for their members with our competitors, we could lose some or all of that business.

Market competition, customer requirements, customer financial condition and customer consolidation through mergers and acquisitions
also could adversely affect our ability to continue or expand our relationships with customers and GPOs. There is no guarantee that we
will be able to retain or renew existing agreements, maintain relationships with any of our customers or GPOs on acceptable terms or at
all or collect amounts owed to us from insolvent customers. Our customer and GPO agreements are generally terminable upon advance
written notice (typically ranging from 30 days to six months) by either us or the customer or GPO, which provides our customers and
GPOs with the opportunity to renegotiate their contracts with us or to award more business to our competitors.

Significant decreases in the volume and/or number of our customers’ purchase orders, the loss of one or more of our major customers or
GPOs or our inability to grow to our current customer base could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.

We may fail to increase or maintain the highest margin portions of our business, including sales to independent restaurant customers
and sales of our private label products.

Our most profitable customers are independent restaurants. We tend to work closely with independent restaurant customers, providing
them access to our customer value-added tools and as a result are able to earn a higher operating margin on sales to them. These customers
are also more likely to purchase our private label products, which are our most profitable products. Our ability to continue to gain market
share of independent restaurant customers is critical to achieving increased operating profits. Changes in the buying practices of
independent restaurant customers, including their ability to require us to sell to them at discounted rates, or decreases in our sales to this
type of customer or a decrease in the sales of our private label products could have a material negative impact on our profitability.

We may fail to realize the expected benefits of acquisitions or effectively integrate the businesses we acquire.

Historically, a portion of our growth has come through acquisitions. In September 2019, we completed the acquisition of the Food Group,
which significantly expands the Company’s network in the West and Northwest parts of the U.S.

If we are unable to integrate acquired businesses successfully or realize anticipated synergies in a timely manner, we may not realize our
projected return on investment and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Integrating
acquired businesses may be more difficult in a region or market where we have limited expertise or with a company culture or operating
structure different than ours. A significant acquisition, in terms of geography or magnitude, could strain our administrative and operational
resources. We also may be unable to retain qualified management and other key personnel of the acquired businesses, which may be
necessary to integrate acquired businesses successfully or realize anticipated synergies in a timely manner.

We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect from our cost savings initiatives.

We may not be able to realize some or all of our expected cost savings. A variety of factors could cause us not to realize expected cost
savings, including, among others, delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost savings initiatives, lack of sustainability
in cost savings over time, and unexpected costs associated with operating our business. All of these factors could negatively affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fuel costs may fluctuate, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Higher costs of fuel may negatively affect consumer confidence and discretionary spending. This may reduce the frequency and amount
spent by consumers for food prepared away from home. In addition, higher costs of fuel may increase the price we pay for products and
the costs we incur to deliver products to our customers. We require significant quantities of fuel for our vehicle fleet, and the price and
supply of fuel are unpredictable and fluctuate based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and
demand for oil and gas, regional production patterns, weather conditions and environmental concerns. Although, from time to time, we
enter into forward purchase commitments for some of our fuel requirements at prices equal to the then-current market price, these forward
purchases may prove ineffective in protecting us from changes in fuel prices or even result in us paying higher than market costs for part

of our fuel. There is no guarantee that we will be able to pass along increased fuel costs to customers in the future. These factors may, in
turn, adversely affect our sales, margins, operating expenses, and operating results.

An economic downturn, or other factors affecting consumer confidence, may reduce the amount of food prepared and consumed
away from home, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The U.S. foodservice distribution industry is sensitive to national, regional and local economic conditions. In the past, an uneven level
of general U.S. economic activity, uncertainty in the financial markets, and slow job growth had a negative impact on consumer confidence
and discretionary spending. A decline in economic activity or the frequency and amount spent by consumers for food prepared away from
home, as well as other macroenvironmental factors which could decrease general consumer confidence (including volatile financial
markets or an uncertain political environment), may negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in consumer eating habits may reduce demand for our products.

Changes in consumer eating habits (such as a decline in consuming food away from home, a decline in portion sizes, or a shift in preferences
toward restaurants that are not our customers) could reduce demand for our products. Consumer eating habits could be affected by a
number of factors, including changes in attitudes regarding diet and health or new information regarding the health effects of consuming
certain foods. There is a growing consumer preference for sustainable, organic and locally grown products. Changing consumer eating
habits also occur due to generational shifts. Millennials, the largest demographic group in the U.S. in terms of spend, generally seek new
and different, as well as more ethnic and diverse, menu options and menu innovation. If consumer eating habits change significantly, we
may be required to modify or discontinue sales of certain items in our product portfolio, and we may experience higher costs associated
with the implementation of those changes. Changing consumer eating habits may reduce the frequency with which consumers purchase
meals outside of the home. Additionally, changes in consumer eating habits may result in the enactment or amendment of laws and
regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our food products, or laws and regulations requiring us to make additional
disclosure regarding the nutritional content of our food products. Compliance with these and other laws and regulations may be costly
and time-consuming. If we are not able to effectively adapt our menu offerings to trends in eating habits or respond to changes in consumer
health perceptions or resulting new laws and regulations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.

Negative publicity or an event which calls into question the safety or integrity of the products we distribute may adversely impact our
reputation and business.

Maintaining a good reputation and the safety and integrity of the products we distribute is critical to our business, particularly in selling
our private label products. Any event that damages our reputation or calls into question the safety or integrity of our products, whether
justified or not, could quickly and negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This includes negative
publicity about the quality, safety, sustainability or integrity of our products. Reports, whether or not they are true, of food-borne illnesses
(such as e. coli, avian flu, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, hepatitis A, trichinosis, salmonella or swine flu) and injuries caused by
food tampering could severely injure our reputation and reduce public confidence in our products. If patrons of our customers become
ill from food-borne illnesses, the customers could be forced to temporarily close locations and our sales would correspondingly decrease.
We may be subject to mandatory or voluntary product recalls or withdrawals. In addition, instances of food-borne illnesses or food
tampering or other health concerns, even those unrelated to our products, can result in negative publicity about the U.S. foodservice
distribution industry and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks related to labor relations and costs.

We had approximately 28,000 employees as of December 28, 2019, of which approximately 5,000 were members of local unions associated
with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and other labor organizations. Our failure to effectively renegotiate any CBAs could
result in work stoppages. From time to time, we may face increased efforts to subject us to multi-location labor disputes, as individual
labor agreements expire or labor disputes arise. This would place us at greater risk of being unable to continue to operate one or more
facilities, possibly delaying deliveries, causing customers to seek alternative suppliers, or otherwise being materially adversely affected
by labor disputes. When there are labor related issues at a facility represented by a local union, sympathy strikes may occur at other
facilities that are represented by other local unions. While we generally believe we have good relations with our employees, including
the unions that represent some of our employees, a work stoppage due to a failure to renegotiate union contracts or for other reasons
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, potential changes in labor legislation and case law could result in current non-union portions of our workforce, including warehouse
and delivery personnel, being subjected to greater organized labor influence. If additional portions of our workforce became subject to
CBAs, this could result in increased costs of doing business as we would become subject to mandatory, binding arbitration or labor
scheduling, costs and standards, which may reduce our operating flexibility.

We are subject to a wide range of labor costs. Because our industry's labor costs are, as a percentage of net sales, higher than many other
industries' labor costs, even if we are able to successfully renegotiate CBAs and avoid work stoppages, we may be significantly impacted
10

by labor cost increases. In addition, labor is a significant cost of many of our customers in the U.S. food-away-from-home industry. Any
increase in their labor costs, including any increases in costs as a result of increases in minimum wage requirements, could reduce the
profitability of our customers and reduce their demand for our products.

We may be unable to attract or retain a qualified and diverse workforce.

The success of our business depends on our ability to attract, train, develop and retain a highly skilled and diverse workforce. Recruiting
and retention efforts (particularly with respect to driver and warehouse personnel) and actions to increase productivity may not be
successful, and we could encounter a shortage of qualified employee talent in the future. Changes in immigration laws and policies could
also make it more difficult for us to recruit or relocate qualified employee talent to meet our business needs. A labor shortage could
potentially increase labor costs, reduce our profitability and/or decrease our ability to effectively serve customers.

If our competitors implement a lower cost structure and offer lower prices to our customers, we may be unable to adjust our cost
structure to compete profitably and retain those customers.

Over the last several decades, the U.S. food retail industry has undergone significant change. Companies such as Wal-Mart and Costco
have developed a lower cost structure, providing their customers with an everyday low-cost product offering. In addition, commercial
wholesale outlets, such as Restaurant Depot, offer an additional low-cost option in the markets they serve. As a large-scale U.S. foodservice
distributor, we have similar strategies to remain competitive in the marketplace by reducing our cost structure. However, to the extent
more of our competitors adopt an everyday low price strategy, we would potentially be pressured to offer lower prices to our customers.
That would require us to achieve additional cost savings to offset these reductions. If we are unable to change our cost structure and
pricing practices rapidly enough to successfully compete in that environment, our business, financial condition and results of operations
may be adversely affected.

Changes in applicable tax laws and regulations and the resolution of tax disputes may negatively affect our financial results.

We are subject to income and other taxes in the U.S. and various state and local jurisdictions, and changes in tax laws or regulations or
tax rulings may have an adverse impact on our effective tax rate. The U.S. and many state and local jurisdictions where we do business
have recently enacted or are actively considering changes in relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations and interpretations. For
example, on December 22, 2017, the U.S. federal government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made broad and complex changes to the U.S. federal income tax code, the impacts
of which are described elsewhere in this Annual Report. Given the unpredictability of possible changes to U.S. federal and state and local
tax laws and regulations, it is very difficult to predict their cumulative effect on our results of operations and cash flows, but new and
changed laws and regulations could adversely impact our results of operations. We are also subject to the examination of our tax returns
and other tax matters by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and other state and local tax authorities and governmental bodies, for
which we regularly assess the likelihood of an adverse outcome. If the ultimate determination of these examinations is that taxes are
owed by us for an amount in excess of amounts previously accrued, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be
adversely affected.

Our business is subject to significant government regulation, and failure to comply with applicable government regulations may lead
to lawsuits, investigations and other liabilities and restrictions on our operations.

Our operations are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, health and safety. These
laws and regulations govern many issues, including discharges to air, soil and water; the handling and disposal of hazardous substances;
the investigation and remediation of contamination resulting from the release of petroleum products and other hazardous substances;
employee health and safety; food safety and quality; and fleet safety. In the course of our operations, we process, handle and transport a
wide variety of food and non-food products, operate and maintain vehicle fleets, use and dispose of hazardous substances, and store fuel
in on-site aboveground and underground storage tanks. At several current and former facilities, we are investigating and remediating
known or suspected contamination from historical releases of fuel and other hazardous substances that is not currently the subject of any
administrative or judicial proceeding, but we may be subject to administrative or judicial proceedings in the future for contamination
related to releases of fuel or other hazardous substances. Some jurisdictions in which we operate have laws and regulations that affect
the composition and operation of truck fleets, such as limits on diesel emissions and engine idling. A number of our facilities have ammonia
or freon-based refrigeration systems, propane, and battery powered forklifts, which could cause injury or environmental damage. Proposed
or recently enacted legal requirements, such as those requiring the phase-out of certain ozone-depleting substances or otherwise regulating
greenhouse gas emissions, may require us to upgrade or replace equipment or may otherwise increase our operating costs. We are
additionally subject to governmental regulation in many other areas of our business, including trade, minimum wage, overtime, wage
payment, wage and hour and employment discrimination, immigration and anticorruption. As an example, due to contracts we have with
federal and state governmental entities, governmental agencies have, from time to time, conducted audits of or requested information
regarding our pricing practices as part of investigations of providers of services under governmental contracts.

Failing to comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, or encountering disagreements with respect to our contracts subject
to governmental regulation, could result in a number of adverse situations. These could include investigations; litigation or other legal
11

proceedings; administrative, civil, or criminal penalties or fines; mandatory or voluntary product recalls; cease and desist orders against
operations that are not in compliance; closing facilities or operations; debarments from contracting with governmental entities; and loss
or modification of existing, or rejection of additional, licenses, permits, registrations, or approvals. These laws and regulations may change
in the future. The costs of compliance and consequences of non-compliance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.

If the products we distribute are alleged to have caused injury, illness or other damage or to have failed to comply with applicable
government regulations, we may need to recall products and may experience product liability claims.

As a distributor and manufacturer of food, we may be subject to product recalls, including voluntary recalls or withdrawals, if the products
we distribute or manufacture are alleged to have caused injury, illness or other damage, to have been mislabeled, misbranded or adulterated
or to otherwise have violated applicable governmental regulations. We may also choose to voluntarily recall or withdraw products that
we determine do not satisfy our quality standards, whether for taste, appearance or otherwise, in order to protect our brand and reputation.
Any future product recall or withdrawal that results in substantial and unexpected expenditures, destruction of product inventory, damage
to our reputation and/or lost sales due to the unavailability of the product for an extended period of time could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be exposed to potential product liability claims in the event that the products we distribute or manufacture are alleged to have
caused injury, illness or other damage. We believe we have sufficient liability insurance to cover product liability claims. We also generally
seek contractual indemnification and insurance coverage from parties supplying products to us. If our current insurance does not continue
to be available at a reasonable cost or is inadequate to cover all of our liabilities, or if our indemnification or insurance coverage is limited,
as a practical matter, by the creditworthiness of the indemnifying party or the insured limits of our suppliers’ insurance coverage, the
liability related to defective products we distribute or manufacture could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

Adverse judgments or settlements resulting from legal proceedings in which we are or may be involved in the normal course of our
business could limit our ability to operate our business and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In the normal course of our business, we are involved in various legal proceedings. The outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted.
If any of these proceedings were determined adversely to us or require a settlement involving a payment of a material sum of money, it
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we could become the
subject of future claims by third parties, including our employees, suppliers, customers, GPOs, investors, or regulators. Any significant
adverse judgments or settlements could reduce our profits and limit our ability to operate our business.

We rely heavily on technology, and we may experience a disruption in existing technology or delay in effectively implementing new
technology.

Our ability to control costs and maximize profits, as well as to serve customers most effectively, depends on the reliability of our information
technology systems and related data entry processes in our transaction intensive business. We rely on software and other information
technology to manage significant aspects of our business, such as purchasing, order processing, warehouse/inventory management, truck
loading and logistics and optimization of storage space. Any disruption to this information technology could negatively affect our customer
service, decrease the volume of our business, and result in increased costs. We have invested in and continue to invest in technology
security initiatives, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans in order to insulate ourselves from technology disruption that could
impair operations and profits.

Information technology evolves rapidly. To compete effectively, we are required to integrate new technologies in a timely and cost-
effective manner. If competitors implement new technologies before we do, allowing them to provide lower priced or enhanced services
of superior quality compared to those we provide, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

A cybersecurity incident may negatively affect our business and our relationships with customers.

We rely upon information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information, to process online credit
card payments, and to manage or support virtually all of our business processes and activities. We also use mobile devices, social networking
and other online activities to connect with our employees, customers, suppliers and other business partners. These uses give rise to
cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft, online platform hijacking that could redirect online
credit card payments to another credit card processing website, and inadvertent or unauthorized release of information. Our business
involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and intellectual property, including
personal information of customers and suppliers, private information about employees, and financial and strategic information about us
and our business partners. We are also expanding and improving our information technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence
and corresponding increase in exposure to cybersecurity risk. Additionally, while we have implemented measures to prevent security

breaches and cyber incidents, our preventative measures and incident response efforts may not be entirely effective. The theft, destruction,
loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our information
technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result in business disruption, negative publicity,
brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of customers, potential liability, and competitive disadvantage, which in turn could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our retirement benefits may give rise to significant expenses and liabilities in the future.

We sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. These pension and postretirement obligations give rise to costs that
are dependent on various assumptions, including those discussed in Note 18, Retirement Plans, in our consolidated financial statements,
many of which are outside of our control, such as performance of financial markets, interest rates, participant age and mortality. In the
event we determine that our assumptions should be revised, our future pension and postretirement plan benefit costs could increase or
decrease. The assumptions we use may differ from actual results, which could have a significant impact on our pension and postretirement
obligations and related costs and funding requirements.

In addition to the plans we sponsor, we also contribute to various multiemployer pension plans administered by labor unions representing
some of our employees. We make periodic contributions to these plans to allow them to meet their pension benefit obligations to their
participants. In the event that we withdraw from participating in one of these plans—including by deciding to discontinue participation
in a plan in the ordinary course renegotiation of a CBA or by reducing the number of employees participating in a plan to a certain degree
over a certain period of time as a result of a facility closure or other change in our operations—then applicable law could require us to
make additional withdrawal liability payments to the plan based on the applicable plan’s funding status. Some multiemployer plans,
including ones to which we contribute, are reported to have significant underfunded liabilities, which could increase the size of potential
withdrawal liability. Any withdrawal liability payments that we are required to make could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.

Extreme weather conditions and natural disasters, and other catastrophic events, may interrupt our business, or our customers’ or
suppliers' businesses.

Some of our facilities and our customers’ and suppliers' facilities are located in areas that may be subject to extreme, and occasionally
prolonged, weather conditions, including hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, and extreme cold. Extreme weather conditions may interrupt
our operations in such areas. Furthermore, extreme weather conditions may interrupt or impede access to our customers’ facilities, reduce
the number of consumers who visit our customers’ facilities, interrupt our suppliers’ production or shipments or increase our suppliers’
product costs, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our business could be affected by large-scale terrorist acts or the outbreak or escalation of armed hostilities (especially those
directed against or otherwise involving the U.S.), the outbreak of food-borne illnesses, the widespread outbreak of infectious diseases or
the occurrence of other catastrophic events. Any of these events could impair our ability to manage our business and/or cause disruption
of economic activity, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on trademarks, trade secrets, and other forms of intellectual property protections, which may not be adequate to protect us
from misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property.

We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws in the U.S. We have applied for registration of
a limited number of trademarks in the U.S. and in certain other countries, some of which have been registered or issued. We cannot
guarantee that our applications will be approved by the applicable governmental authorities, or that third parties will not seek to oppose
or otherwise challenge our registrations or applications. We also rely on unregistered proprietary rights, including common law trademark
protection. Third parties may use trademarks identical or confusingly similar to ours, or independently develop trade secrets or know-
how similar or equivalent to ours. If our proprietary information is divulged to third parties, including our competitors, or our intellectual
property rights are otherwise misappropriated or infringed, our business could be harmed or adversely affected.

Our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may cause us to incur unexpected costs or prevent us from
selling our products.

We cannot be certain that our products do not and will not infringe intellectual property rights of others. We may be subject to legal
proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of intellectual property rights of
third parties by us or our customers in connection with their use of our products. Any such claims, whether or not meritorious, could
result in costly litigation and divert the efforts of our management and personnel. Moreover, if we were found liable for infringement or
enter into a settlement, we may be required to enter into licensing agreements (if available on acceptable terms or at all), pay damages
or cease making or selling certain products, which could cause us to incur significant costs and/or prevent us from selling or manufacturing
certain products.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Our level of indebtedness may adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to raise additional capital or obtain financing
in the future, react to changes in our business, and make required payments on our debt.

We had $4,736 million of indebtedness, net of $43 million of unamortized deferred financing costs, as of December 28, 2019.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under, our debt facilities depends on our ongoing financial
and operating performance, among other things, and may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions beyond our control,
including as discussed under the caption “Risks Related to Our Business and Industry” above. If our cash flows and capital resources are
insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, raise additional
equity capital or restructure our debt. However, there is no assurance that such alternative measures may be successful or permitted under
the agreements governing our indebtedness and, as a result, we may not be able to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the
absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material
assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations.

Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:

•

a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our
indebtedness, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions and general corporate purposes;

we are exposed to the risk of increased interest rates because approximately 65% of the net principal amount of our borrowings
was at variable rates of interest as of December 28, 2019;

it may be difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration of such
indebtedness;

we may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt or more favorable interest rates and
they, as a result, may be better positioned to withstand competitive pressures and general adverse economic and industry
conditions; and

our ability to refinance indebtedness and obtain additional financing may be limited or the associated costs of refinancing
and obtaining additional financing may increase.

Our indebtedness may further increase from time to time and we may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness, including
secured debt, in the future for various reasons. Although the agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on the incurrence
of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of significant qualifications and exceptions and, under certain
circumstances, the amount of indebtedness that could be incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Incurring
substantial additional indebtedness could further exacerbate the risks associated with our level of indebtedness.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain restrictions and limitations that may significantly impact our ability to operate
our business.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to: dispose of assets; incur
additional indebtedness (including guarantees of additional indebtedness); pay dividends and make certain payments; create liens on
assets; make investments; engage in certain business combination transactions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; change the
business we conduct; and amend specific debt agreements. In addition, these agreements subject us to various financial covenants.

The restrictions under the agreements governing our indebtedness may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the
best interest of our business, and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with
companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive and
financial covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure that we will be granted waivers of or
amendments to these obligations if for any reason we are unable to comply with them, or that we will be able to refinance our debt on
acceptable terms or at all.

Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in the agreements governing our indebtedness depends on our ongoing
financial and operating performance, among other things, and may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions beyond
our control, including as discussed under the caption “Risks Related to Our Business and Industry” above. The breach of any of these
covenants or restrictions could result in a default under the agreements governing our indebtedness that would permit the applicable
lenders or note holders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued
and unpaid interest. If we are unable to repay debt, lenders having secured obligations could proceed against the collateral securing the
debt. In any such case, we may be unable to borrow under and may not be able to repay the amounts due under our indebtedness. This

could have serious consequences to our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt
or insolvent.

Changes in the method of determining LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, may adversely
affect the cost of servicing our debt.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”),
announced that it intends to phase out the use of LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods
of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. Amounts drawn under each of our asset based senior
secured revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”), accounts receivable financing facility (the “ABS Facility”) and initial and
incremental senior secured term loan facilities (the “Initial Term Loan Facility” and the “Incremental Term Loan Facility,” respectively)
may bear interest at rates based upon, among other things, U.S. dollar LIBOR. As such, depending on the future of LIBOR, we may need
to renegotiate certain standards in or terms of the agreements governing this indebtedness to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR with a new
standard or we may be required to borrow this indebtedness based upon alternate interest rate conventions as set forth in those agreements,
which could increase the cost of servicing this debt and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We maintained 92 primary operating facilities, consisting of 72 distribution centers and other supporting facilities as of February 13,
2020. Approximately 77% were owned and 23% were leased. Our real estate includes our corporate headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois
and our shared services center in Tempe, Arizona, both of which are leased. Our properties also include a number of Chef’Stores, US
Foods Culinary Equipment & Supply outlet locations, temporary storage sites, remote sales offices, trailer “drop-sites,” and vacant land
not included in the count above. The lease arrangements for the leased properties expire at various dates from 2020 to 2031, although
certain of these lease arrangements include options for renewal. We believe our properties are suitable and adequate to serve the needs
of our business.

The following table lists our primary operating facilities and their aggregate square footage, by state. These operating facilities, include
distribution centers that may contain multiple locations or buildings and other supporting facilities. In addition, the table includes our
leased Rosemont headquarters and Tempe shared services center. The table does not include Chef’Stores, or US Foods Culinary
Equipment & Supply outlet locations. It also does not include closed locations, vacant properties or ancillary use properties, such as
temporary storage sites, remote sales offices and trailer drop-sites.

Location
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Louisiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Total

Number of
Facilities

Square Feet

2
1
4
1
7
2
1
5
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
2
4
1
3
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
6
2
1
2
4
1
2
5
1
2
92

438,804
131,285
566,196
135,009
1,687,663
501,427
239,899
1,173,162
691,017
856,147
233,784
114,250
350,859
69,304
276,003
414,963
287,356
602,947
194,088
246,430
840,219
533,237
1,073,375
133,486
388,683
954,736
221,314
501,894
308,307
350,000
1,179,319
1,220,499
47,400
602,270
963,732
267,180
629,318
893,570
220,537
354,127
20,893,796

Owned
Leased

16,046,712
4,847,084

77%
23%

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any of
our pending legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Common Stock and Stockholders

Our common stock began trading publicly on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “USFD” as of May 26, 2016.
Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. There were 22,954 holders of record of our common stock as of
February 7, 2020. This figure does not include a substantially greater number of “street name” holders whose shares are held of record
by banks, brokers and other financial institutions.

Dividends

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our common stock began trading publicly on the NYSE.

We have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The declaration, amount, and payment of any future
dividends on shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors. In making any such decision, our Board of
Directors may take into account, among other things, our results of operations, capital requirements, financial condition, contractual
restrictions, and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Stock Performance Graph

The following stock performance graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return of the Company’s common stock with the
cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Food and Staples Retailing Index since May 26, 2016, the date the
Company’s common stock began trading on the NYSE. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in our common stock and each of
such indices on May 26, 2016 and the reinvestment of dividends, as applicable. Performance data for the Company, the S&P 500 Index
and the S&P 500 Food and Staples Retailing Index is provided as of the last trading day of each of our last four fiscal years.

US Foods Holding Corp.

S&P 500

S&P Food and Staples Retailing Index

100

110

107

128

134

132

127 $

128

131

168

169

167

5/26/16

12/31/16

12/30/17

12/29/18

12/28/19

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The selected historical consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, and the related selected balance
sheet data as of the end of fiscal years 2019 and 2018, have been derived from our consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected historical consolidated statements of operations data for fiscal years 2016 and
2015, and the related selected balance sheet data as of the end of fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, have been derived from our consolidated
financial statements not included in this Annual Report.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read together with Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of Part
II.

The following tables set forth our selected financial data for the periods and as of the dates indicated:

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Operating expenses:

Distribution, selling and administrative costs
Restructuring costs (benefit)

Total operating expenses
Operating income
Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition termination fees—net
Other expense (income)—net
Interest expense—net
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Income before income taxes
Income tax provision (benefit)
Net income
Net income per share:

Basic
Diluted

Weighted-average number of shares used in per share amounts:

Basic
Diluted
Other Data:
Cash flows—operating activities
Cash flows—investing activities
Cash flows—financing activities
Capital expenditures
EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted net income(1)
Free cash flow(2)

2019

2018

Fiscal Year
2017

2016

2015

(in millions, except per share data)

$ 25,939
21,352
4,587

$ 24,175
19,869
4,306

$ 24,147
19,929
4,218

$ 22,919
18,866
4,053

$ 23,127
19,114
4,013

3,888

—
3,888
699
—
4
184
—
511
126
385

1.77
1.75

218
220

760
(1,987)
1,220
258
1,057
1,194
523
502

$
$

3,647

1
3,648
658
—
(13)
175
—
496
89
407

1.88
1.87

216
218

609
(232)
(391)
235
1,011
1,103
472
374

$
$

3,631

(1)
3,630
588
—
14
170
—
404
(40)
444

2.00
1.97

223
226

749
(356)
(405)
221
952
1,058
370
528

$
$

3,581

53
3,634
419
—
5
229
54
131
(79)
210

1.05
1.03

200
204

549
(762)
(180)
164
782
972
476
385

$
$

3,651

173
3,824
189
288
(1)
285
—
193
25
168

0.99
0.98

170
171

555
(271)
(110)
187
876
875
300
368

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Total assets
Total debt
Total shareholders’ equity

2019

2018

As of Fiscal Year
2017
(in millions)

2016

2015

98
11,288
4,736
3,709

105
9,186
3,457
3,229

119
9,037
3,757
2,751

131
8,944
3,782
2,538

524
9,239
4,745
1,873

(1)

(2)

EBITDA is defined as net income, plus interest expense—net, income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is
defined as EBITDA adjusted for (1) fees paid to Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (“CD&R”) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P. (“KKR” and, together
with CD&R, the “Former Sponsors”); (2) restructuring costs (benefit); (3) share-based compensation expense; (4) the non-cash impact of last-in first-out
(“LIFO”) reserve adjustments; (5) loss on extinguishment of debt; (6) pension settlements; (7) business transformation costs; (8) costs related to the
formerly proposed acquisition of US Foods by Sysco Corporation (the “Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition”), which was contemplated by the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 8, 2013; (9) Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition termination fees—net; and (10) other gains, losses, or costs
as specified in the agreements governing our indebtedness. Adjusted net income is defined as net income excluding the items used to calculate Adjusted
EBITDA listed above and further adjusted for the tax effect of the exclusions and discrete tax items. Effective as of fiscal year 2019, we revised the
definition of Adjusted net income to also exclude the effect of intangible asset amortization expense. Prior year amounts have been revised to conform
with the current year presentation. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted net income as presented in this Annual Report are supplemental measures
of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). They are
not measurements of our performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measures derived
in accordance with GAAP. For additional information, see the discussion under the caption “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” below.
Free cash flow is defined as cash flows provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. Free cash flow as presented in this Annual Report is a
supplemental measure of our liquidity that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. It is not a measurement of our liquidity under
GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows provided by operating activities or any other liquidity measures derived in accordance
with GAAP. For additional information, see the discussion under the caption “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” below.

Non-GAAP Reconciliations

We provide EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income and Free cash flow as supplemental measures to GAAP financial measures
regarding our operating performance and liquidity. These non-GAAP financial measures, as defined above, exclude the impact of certain
items and, therefore, have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP.

We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide meaningful supplemental information about our operating performance because
they exclude amounts that we do not consider part of our core operating results when assessing our performance.

We believe that Adjusted net income is a useful measure of operating performance for both management and investors because it excludes
items that are not reflective of our core operating performance and provides an additional view of our operating performance including
depreciation, interest expense, and income taxes on a consistent basis from period to period. We believe that Adjusted net income may
be used by investors, analysts and other interested parties to facilitate period-over-period comparisons and provides additional clarity as
to how factors and trends impact our operating performance.

Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures (1) to evaluate our historical and prospective financial performance as well as
our performance relative to our competitors as they assist in highlighting trends, (2) to set internal sales targets and spending budgets,
(3) to measure operational profitability and the accuracy of forecasting, (4) to assess financial discipline over operational expenditures,
and (5) as an important factor in determining variable compensation for management and employees. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
are also used in connection with certain covenants and activity restrictions under the agreements governing our indebtedness. We also
believe these and similar non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors, and other interested parties
to evaluate companies in our industry. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income are not measurements of our performance
under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with
GAAP.

We use Free cash flow as a supplemental measure to GAAP financial measures regarding the liquidity of our operations. We measure
Free cash flow as cash flows provided by operating activities less capital expenditures. We believe that Free cash flow is a useful financial
metric to assess our ability to pursue business opportunities and investments. Free cash flow is not a measure of our liquidity under GAAP
and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows provided by operating activities or any other liquidity measures derived in
accordance with GAAP.

We caution readers that amounts presented in accordance with our definitions of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, and
Free cash flow may not be the same as similar measures used by other companies. Not all companies and analysts calculate EBITDA,
Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income or Free cash flow in the same manner. We compensate for these limitations by using these non-

GAAP financial measures as supplements to GAAP financial measures and by presenting the reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial
measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures.

The following table reconciles EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income and Free cash flow to the most directly comparable
GAAP financial performance and liquidity measures for the periods indicated:

Net income
Interest expense—net
Income tax provision (benefit)
Depreciation expense
Amortization expense
EBITDA
Adjustments:

Former Sponsor fees(1)
Restructuring costs (benefit)(2)
Share-based compensation expense(3)
LIFO reserve adjustment(4)
Loss on extinguishment of debt(5)
Pension settlements(6)
Business transformation costs(7)
Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition termination fees—net(8)
Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition-related costs(9)
Food Group acquisition-related costs and other(10)

Adjusted EBITDA

Depreciation expense
Interest expense—net
Income tax provision, as adjusted(11)(12)

Adjusted net income(11)
Free cash flow

Cash flows from operating activities
Capital expenditures
Free cash flow

2019

2018

Fiscal Year
2017
(in millions)

2016

2015

385
184
126
311
51
1,057

—
—
32
22
—
12
9
—
—
62
1,194
(311)
(184)
(176)
523

760
(258)
502

407
175
89
300
40
1,011

—
1
28
—
—
—
22
—
—
41
1,103
(300)
(175)
(156)
472

609
(235)
374

444
170
(40)
283
95
952

—
(1)
21
14
—
18
40
—
—
14
1,058
(283)
(170)
(235)
370

749
(221)
528

210
229
(79)
266
155
782

36
53
18
(18)
54
—
37
—
1
10
972
(266)
(229)
(1)
476

549
(164)
385

168
285
25
253
146
876

10
173
16
(74)
—
—
46
(288)
85
31
875
(253)
(285)
(37)
300

555
(187)
368

(1)

(2)

(3)
(4)
(5)

(6)

(7)
(8)

(9)
(10)

Consists of fees paid to the Former Sponsors for consulting and management advisory services. On June 1, 2016, the consulting agreements with each
of the Former Sponsors were terminated for an aggregate termination fee of $31 million.
Consists primarily of facility related closing costs, including severance and related costs, tangible asset impairment charges and subsequent gains on sale,
organizational realignment costs and estimated multiemployer pension withdrawal liabilities and settlements.
Share-based compensation expense for stock and option awards and discounts provided under employee stock purchase plan.
Represents the non-cash impact of LIFO reserve adjustments.
Includes fees paid to debt holders, third party costs, the write-off of certain pre-existing unamortized deferred financing costs related to the 2016 debt
refinancing transactions; early redemption premium and the write-off of unamortized issue premium related to the June 2016 debt refinancing; and the
loss related to the September 2016 defeasance of our commercial mortgage backed securities facility.
Consists of settlement charges resulting from payments to settle benefit obligations with former and current participants in our defined benefit pension
plan. See Note 18, Retirement Plans, in our consolidated financial statements for a further description of the pension settlement charges for fiscal years
2019 and 2017.
Consists primarily of costs related to significant process and systems redesign across multiple functions.
Consists of net fees received in connection with the termination of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 8, 2013, which contemplated
the Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition.
Consists of costs related to the Formerly Proposed Sysco Acquisition, including certain employee retention costs.
Includes Food Group acquisition-related costs of $52 million and $29 million for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. Also includes gains, losses or
costs as specified under the agreements governing our indebtedness.

(11) Effective as of fiscal year 2019, we revised the definition of Adjusted net income to also exclude the effect of intangible asset amortization expense. Prior

year amounts have been revised to conform with the current year presentation.

(12) Represents our income tax provision adjusted for the tax effect of pre-tax items excluded from Adjusted net income and the removal of applicable discrete
tax items. Applicable discrete tax items include changes in tax laws or rates, changes related to prior year unrecognized tax benefits, discrete changes in
valuation allowances, excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation, and the tax benefits recognized in continuing operations due to the
existence of a gain in other comprehensive income and loss in continuing operations. The tax effect of pre-tax items excluded from Adjusted net income
is computed using a statutory tax rate after taking into account the impact of permanent differences and valuation allowances. We released a valuation

allowance against federal and certain state net deferred tax assets in fiscal year 2016. We were required to reflect the portion of the valuation allowance
release related to 2016 ordinary income in the estimated annual effective income tax rate and the portion of the valuation allowance release related to
future years’ income discretely in fiscal year 2016. We maintained a valuation allowance against federal and state net deferred tax assets for fiscal year
2015. The result was an immaterial tax effect related to pre-tax items excluded from Adjusted net income for fiscal years 2015 and 2016.

A reconciliation between the GAAP income tax provision (benefit) and the income tax provision, as adjusted, is as follows:

GAAP income tax provision (benefit)
Tax impact of pre-tax income adjustments(1)
Discrete tax items
Income tax provision, as adjusted

2019

2018

Fiscal Year
2017
(in millions)

2016

2015

126
47
3
176

89
32
35
156

(40) $
76
199
235

(79) $
—
80
1

25
—
12
37

(1)

Effective as of the third quarter of fiscal year 2019, we revised the definition of Adjusted net income to also exclude the effect of intangible asset amortization
expense. Prior year amounts have been revised to conform with the current year presentation

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended to help the reader understand the Company, our financial condition and results of
operations and our present business environment. It should be read together with Item 6 of Part II, “Selected Financial Data,” and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion and analysis
contain certain financial measures that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. We believe these non-GAAP financial
measures provide meaningful supplemental information about our operating performance and liquidity. Information regarding
reconciliations of and the rationale for these measures is discussed in “Non-GAAP Reconciliations” in Item 6 of Part II, “Selected Financial
Data.”

The following includes a comparison of our consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2019 and 2018. For a comparison of our
consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, see Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 29, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.

Operating Metrics

Case growth—Case growth, by customer type (e.g., independent restaurants) is reported as of a point in time. Customers periodically
are reclassified, based on changes in size or other characteristics, and when those changes occur, the respective customer’s historical
volume follows its new classification.

Organic growth—Organic growth includes growth from operating business that has been reflected in our results of operations for at least
12 months.

Fiscal Year 2019 Highlights

Food Group Acquisition—On September 13, 2019, USF completed the $1.8 billion all cash acquisition of the Food Group. The acquisition
of the Food Group expands the Company’s network in the West and Northwest parts of the U.S. The assets, liabilities and results of
operations of the Food Group have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the date the acquisition was
completed.

Financial Highlights—Total case volume in fiscal year 2019, increased 4.6%, reflecting growth with independent restaurants of 7.1%.
Net sales increased $1,764 million, or 7.3%, in fiscal year 2019 primarily due to the increase in organic case volume and year-over-year
inflation in multiple product categories, including grocery, poultry, beef and produce. The inclusion of the Food Group in our operations
contributed net sales of $843 million in fiscal year 2019.

Gross profit increased $281 million, or 6.5%, to $4,587 million in fiscal year 2019, primarily as a result of the impact of margin expansion
initiatives, the inclusion of the Food Group in our operations, and an increase in organic case volume, which were partially offset by
unfavorable year-over-year LIFO adjustments. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit was 17.7%, compared to 17.8% in fiscal year
2018.

Total operating expenses increased $240 million, or 6.6%, to $3,888 million in fiscal year 2019, primarily as a result of higher wage
costs, which were primarily distribution related, the inclusion of the Food Group in our operations and acquisition-related costs, which
were partially offset by the positive impact of expense control initiatives.

Outlook

With favorable trends in consumer confidence and the unemployment rate, we expect moderate positive growth in the U.S. foodservice
distribution industry in fiscal year 2020. General economic trends and conditions, including demographic shifts, inflation, deflation,
consumer confidence, and disposable income, coupled with evolving consumer tastes and preferences, influence the amount that
consumers spend on food-away-from-home and create opportunities for new and innovative products, which in turn, is expected to
create growth, expand margins and produce better retention opportunities for foodservice distributors with the flexibility to balance
national scale and local preferences. On balance, we believe that we have the scale, foresight and agility required to proactively address
and benefit from these general industry trends, and that our strategy positions us to make the most out of the continued growth in food-
away-from-home consumption. Notwithstanding, we expect competitive pressures to remain high and a moderate amount of inflation
in fiscal year 2020. Given that a large portion of our business is based on a contracted margin percentage or markups over cost, sudden
inflation or prolonged deflation could negatively impact our sales and gross profit. We expect sales to our independent restaurant
customers, which generally have higher margins, to continue to be an increasing proportion of our sales mix. Favorable customer mix,
additional volume from acquisitions and other sourcing initiatives should also continue to contribute to our ability to expand our
margins. Further, we believe our differentiated strategy will enable us to reach more customers and create deeper relationships with
existing ones, particularly within our targeted customer types for which we generate higher margins, and to drive increased penetration
of our private brands.

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected consolidated results of operations of our business for fiscal years 2019 and 2018:

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

Net sales

Cost of goods sold

Gross profit

Operating expenses:

Distribution, selling and administrative costs

Restructuring costs

Total operating expenses

Operating income

Other expense (income) net

Interest expense—net

Income before income taxes
Income tax provision

Net income

Percentage of Net Sales:

Gross profit

Distribution, selling and administrative costs

Operating expenses

Operating income

Net income
Adjusted EBITDA(1)

Other Data:

Cash flows—operating activities

Cash flows—investing activities

Cash flows—financing activities

Capital expenditures
EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted net income(1)
Free cash flow(2)

Fiscal Year

2019

2018

(in millions)

25,939

21,352

4,587

3,888

—

3,888

699

184
511

126

385

17.7%

15.0%

2.7%

1.5%

4.6%

760

(1,987)

1,220

258

1,057

1,194

523

502

24,175

19,869

4,306

3,647

3,648

658

(13)

175
496

407

17.8%

15.1%

2.7%

1.7%

4.6%

609

(232)

(391)

235

1,011

1,103

472

374

(1)

(2)

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted net income as presented in this Annual Report are supplemental measures of our performance that are not
required by, or presented in accordance with, GAAP. They are not measurements of our performance under GAAP and should not be considered as
alternatives to net income (loss) or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP. Effective as of fiscal year 2019, we revised the
definition of Adjusted net income to also exclude the effect of intangible asset amortization expense. Prior year amounts have been revised to conform
with the current year presentation.
Free cash flow as presented in this Annual Report is a supplemental measure of our liquidity that is not required by, or presented in accordance with,
GAAP. It is not a measure of our liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows provided by operating activities, or
any other liquidity measures derived in accordance with GAAP.

See additional information including the reconciliation of these measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures, in “Non-
GAAP Reconciliations” in Item 6 of Part II, “Selected Financial Data.”

Comparison of Results

Fiscal Years Ended December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018

Highlights

•

Total case volume increased 4.6% and independent restaurant case volume increased 7.1% in fiscal year 2019.

Net sales increased $1,764 million, or 7.3% to $25,939 million in fiscal year 2019.

Operating income increased $41 million, or 6.2%, to $699 million in fiscal year 2019. As a percentage of net sales, operating
income was 2.7% in both fiscal years 2019 and 2018.

Net income was $385 million in fiscal year 2019, compared to $407 million in fiscal year 2018.

Adjusted EBITDA increased $91 million, or 8.3%, to $1,194 million in fiscal year 2019. As a percentage of net sales, Adjusted
EBITDA was 4.6% in both fiscal years 2019 and 2018.

Net Sales

Total case volume increased 4.6% in fiscal year 2019. The increase reflects growth with independent restaurants of 7.1%. Organic case
volume increased 1.1% and organic independent restaurant case volume increased 4.4%.

Net sales increased $1,764 million, or 7.3%, to $25,939 million in fiscal year 2019, comprised of a $1,107 million, or 4.6%, increase in
case volume and a $657 million, or 2.7%, increase in the overall net sales rate per case. Sales of private brands increased approximately
70 bps and represented approximately 35% of net sales in both fiscal years 2019 and 2018. The Food Group contributed net sales of
$843 million in fiscal year 2019.

The increase in the net sales rate per case of 2.7% primarily reflects year-over-year inflation. We experienced year-over-year inflation in
multiple product categories, including grocery, poultry, beef and produce, which benefited net sales since a significant portion of our
sales is based on markups over product cost.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $281 million, or 6.5%, to $4,587 million in fiscal year 2019, primarily as a result of the impact of margin expansion
initiatives, contributions from the Food Group and an increase in organic case volume, which were partially offset by unfavorable year-
over-year LIFO adjustments. Our LIFO method of inventory costing resulted in expense of $22 million in fiscal year 2019, compared to
de minimis expense in fiscal year 2018, and was driven by higher product inflation in multiple product categories in fiscal year 2019
compared to fiscal year 2018. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 17.7% in fiscal year 2019, compared to 17.8% in fiscal year
2018.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses, comprised of distribution, selling and administrative costs and restructuring costs, increased $240 million, or 6.6%,
to $3,888 million in 2019. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales were 15.0% in fiscal year 2019, compared to 15.1% in fiscal
year 2018. The increase in operating expenses included $149 million of higher distribution-related wage and related costs driven by an
increase in organic case volume, contributions from the Food Group, $23 million of higher acquisition-related costs, $23 million of higher
self-insurance costs, and $22 million of higher other distribution-related costs, which were partially offset by the positive impact of
expense control initiatives.

Operating Income

Operating income increased $41 million, or 6.2%, to $699 million in fiscal year 2019. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was
2.7% in fiscal year 2019, compared to 2.7% in fiscal year 2018. The change in operating income was due to the factors discussed in the
relevant sections above.

Other Expense (Income)—Net

Other expense (income)—net includes components of net periodic benefit costs (credits), exclusive of the service cost component
associated with our defined benefit and other postretirement plans. We recognized other expense—net of $4 million in fiscal year 2019,
including $12 million of non-cash settlement charges resulting from payments to settle benefit obligations with former and current
participants in our defined benefit pension plan. We recognized other income—net of $13 million in fiscal year 2018, primarily due to
the improved funded status of our defined benefit and other postretirement retirement plans as of December 30, 2017.

Interest Expense—Net

Interest expense—net increased $9 million in fiscal year 2019, primarily due to borrowings incurred to finance the acquisition of the
Food Group, which were partially offset by lower average revolving credit facility borrowings.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2019 of 25% varied from the 21% federal corporate income tax rate, primarily as a result of
state income taxes and the recognition of various discrete tax items. These discrete tax items included a tax benefit of $4 million primarily
related to excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation. Our effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2018 of 18% varied
from the 21% federal corporate income tax rate, primarily as a result of state income taxes and the recognition of a tax benefit of $21 million.
This tax benefit primarily related to (1) the reduction of an unrecognized tax benefit due to the receipt of an affirmative written consent
from the IRS to change a method of accounting, (2) a tax benefit of $6 million, primarily related to excess tax benefits associated with
share-based compensation and (3) a tax benefit of $8 million primarily related to the adjustments finalizing provisional amounts recorded
as of December 30, 2017 in connection with the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate under the Tax Act.

Net Income

Our net income was $385 million in fiscal year 2019, compared to $407 million in fiscal year 2018. The decrease in net income was due
to the relevant factors discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our ongoing operations and strategic objectives require working capital and continuing capital investment. Our primary sources of
liquidity include cash provided by operations, as well as access to capital from bank borrowings and other types of debt and financing
arrangements.

Indebtedness

The aggregate carrying value of our indebtedness was $4,736 million, net of $43 million of unamortized deferred financing costs, as of
December 28, 2019.

We completed a refinancing of our former asset based senior secured revolving credit facility with a new facility on May 31, 2019. The
ABL Facility provides us with loan commitments having a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1,600 million, comprised of (1)
$1,400 million of commitments that became effective on May 31, 2019 and (2) $200 million of commitments that became effective on
November 22, 2019. The ABL Facility includes subfacilities for the issuance of up to $800 million of letters of credit and up to $170 million
of swing line loans. We had no outstanding borrowings and had issued letters of credit totaling $314 million under the ABL Facility as
of December 28, 2019. There was available capacity of $1,227 million under the ABL Facility based on our borrowing base as of
December 28, 2019.

We amended the ABS Facility on September 20, 2019 to, among other things, lower the interest rate margin. The maximum borrowing
capacity under the ABS Facility is $800 million. We had outstanding borrowings under the ABS Facility of $190 million as of December 28,
2019. There was available capacity of $552 million under the ABS Facility based on our borrowing base as of December 28, 2019.

We amended the Initial Term Loan Facility on November 26, 2019 to, among other things, lower the interest rate margins. The Initial
Term Loan Facility had a carrying value of $2,125 million, net of $4 million of unamortized deferred financing costs, as of December 28,
2019.

We entered into the Incremental Term Loan Facility on September 13, 2019 to finance a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition
of the Food Group. The Incremental Term Loan Facility had a carrying value of $1,465 million, net of $35 million of unamortized deferred
financing costs, as of December 28, 2019.

Our unsecured senior notes (the “Senior Notes”) had a carrying value of $596 million, net of $4 million of unamortized deferred financing
costs, as of December 28, 2019. The Senior Notes bear interest at 5.875%. As of June 15, 2019, the Senior Notes are redeemable, at our
option, in whole or in part at a price of 102.938% of their remaining principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the
redemption date. On or after June 15, 2020 and June 15, 2021, the optional redemption price for the Senior Notes declines to 101.469%
and 100.0%, respectively, of their remaining principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.

We also had $352 million of obligations under financing leases for transportation equipment and building leases as of December 28,
2019.

The ABL Facility and the ABS Facility mature in 2024 and 2022, respectively. The Initial Term Loan Facility and the Incremental Term
Loan Facility mature in 2023 and 2026, respectively. The Senior Notes mature in 2024. As economic conditions permit, we will consider
opportunities to repurchase, refinance or otherwise reduce our debt obligations on favorable terms. Any potential debt reduction or
refinancing could require significant use of our other available liquidity and capital resources.

We believe that the combination of cash generated from operations, together with availability under the agreements governing our
indebtedness and other financing arrangements, will be adequate to permit us to meet our debt service obligations, ongoing costs of
operations, working capital needs, and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months.

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain customary covenants. These include, among other things, covenants that restrict our
ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on our assets, pay dividends, or engage in mergers or consolidations.
For additional information, see Item 1A of Part I, “Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness.” USF had approximately $1.3 billion
of restricted payment capacity under these covenants and approximately $2.4 billion of its net assets were restricted after taking into
consideration the net deferred tax assets and intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation as of December 28, 2019.

Every quarter, we review rating agency changes for all of the lenders that have a continuing obligation to provide us with funding. We
are not aware of any facts that indicate our lenders will not be able to comply with the contractual terms of their agreements with us. We
continue to monitor the credit markets generally and the strength of our lender counterparties.

From time to time, we repurchase or otherwise retire our debt and take other steps to reduce our debt or otherwise improve our leverage.
These actions may include open market repurchases, negotiated repurchases, and other retirements of outstanding debt. The amount of
debt that may be repurchased or otherwise retired, if any, will depend on market conditions, our debt trading levels, our cash position,
and other considerations.

See Note 13, Debt, in our consolidated financial statements for a further description of our indebtedness.

Cash Flows

The following table presents condensed highlights from our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for fiscal years 2019 and 2018:

Fiscal Year

2019

2018

Net income
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions
Other adjustments
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—beginning of year
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—end of year

Operating Activities

(in millions)
385
(54)
429
760
(1,987)
1,220
(7)
105
98

407
(235)
437
609
(232)
(391)
(14)
119
105

Cash flows provided by operating activities increased $151 million to $760 million in fiscal year 2019. The year-over-year increase was
primarily driven by $70 million of contributions to our defined benefit pension plan in fiscal year 2018, which did not reoccur during
fiscal year 2019, along with improved business performance and improved working capital performance.

Investing Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal year 2019 included the $1.8 billion cash purchase price for the acquisition of the Food
Group. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal year 2019 also included cash expenditures of $258 million on property and
equipment for fleet replacement and investments in information technology, as well as new construction and/or expansion of distribution
facilities. We sold certain Food Group assets for aggregate closing proceeds of $94 million and sold certain excess properties for aggregate
proceeds of $6 million during fiscal year 2019.

Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal year 2018 included cash expenditures of $235 million on property and equipment for
fleet replacement and investments in information technology, as well as new construction and expansion of distribution facilities.

We expect total capital additions in fiscal year 2020 to be between $325 million and $335 million, inclusive of approximately $80 million
in fleet financing leases. We expect to fund our capital expenditures with available cash or cash generated from operations and through
fleet financing.

Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities in fiscal year 2019 included aggregate borrowings of $1.5 billion under the Incremental Term
Loan Facility and approximately $330 million in borrowings under the ABL Facility and ABS Facility, which were used to finance the
28

acquisition of the Food Group. Cash flows used in financing activities in fiscal year 2019 included net payments of $166 million under
our revolving credit facilities and $116 million of scheduled payments under our non-revolving debt and financing leases. We incurred
approximately $44 million of lender fees and third party costs in connection with the Incremental Term Loan Facility and other debt
refinancings. Financing activities in fiscal year 2019 also included $19 million of proceeds received from stock purchases under our
employee stock purchase plan and $19 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, which were partially offset by
$5 million of employee tax withholdings paid in connection with the vesting of equity awards.

Cash flows used in financing activities of $391 million in fiscal year 2018 included $304 million of net payments under our revolving
credit facilities and $113 million of scheduled payments on non-revolving debt and financing leases. Financing activities in fiscal year
2018 also included $19 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and $19 million of proceeds from share purchases
under our employee stock purchase plan, which were partially offset by the remittance of $6 million of employee tax withholdings paid
in connection with vested equity awards.

Retirement Plans

We sponsor a defined benefit retirement plan that pays benefits to eligible employees at retirement. In addition, we provide certain
postretirement health and welfare benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents. We did not make a significant contribution to the
Company sponsored defined benefit and other postretirement plans in fiscal year 2019. We contributed $71 million to the Company
sponsored defined benefit and other postretirement plans in fiscal year 2018. As described in Note 18, Retirement Plans, in
our consolidated financial statements, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, we completed a voluntary lump sum settlement offer to
certain terminated defined benefit plan participants. In addition, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, we also completed a spin-off
of certain active participants with small accrued benefits and retirees into a separate plan and immediately terminated that plan. Those
participants were able to elect to receive immediate lump sum payouts, with any remaining liabilities transferred to an insurance company
through the purchase of an annuity contract. Pension obligation settlement payments of $66 million related to these transactions, consisting
of lump sum payments and purchased annuities, were paid from pension plan assets.

Certain employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) savings plan. We made employer matching contributions to the 401(k) plan
of $51 million and $47 million in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively.

We also are required to contribute to various multiemployer pension plans under the terms of certain of our CBAs. Our contributions to
these plans were $38 million and $35 million in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

The following table includes information about our significant contractual obligations as of December 28, 2019 that affect our liquidity
and capital needs. The table includes information about payments due under specified contractual obligations and the maturity profile of
our consolidated debt, operating leases and other long-term liabilities.

Recorded Contractual Obligations:

Debt, including financing lease obligations
Operating lease obligations
Self-insured liabilities(1)
Pension plans and other postretirement benefits contributions(2)

Unrecorded Contractual Obligations:

Interest payments on debt(3)
Multiemployer contractual minimum pension contributions(4)
Purchase obligations(5)

Total contractual cash obligations

Payments Due by Period

Total

Less Than
1 Year

1-3 Years

3-5 Years

More Than
5 Years

4,779
203
172
7

882
15
1,092
7,150

142
48
44
1

181
4
1,028
1,448

398
71
47
2

358
7
55
938

2,783
42
23
2

231
4
9
3,094

1,456
42
58
2

112
—
—
1,670

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Represents the estimated undiscounted payments on our self-insurance programs for general, fleet and workers compensation liabilities. Actual
payments may differ from these estimates.
Represents estimated contributions and benefit payments for Company sponsored pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Estimates
beyond fiscal year 2020 are not available for the Company's defined benefit pension plan.
Represents future interest payments on fixed rate debt, financing leases and $3.1 billion of variable rate debt at interest rates as of December 28,
2019. The amounts shown in the table include interest payments under interest rate swap agreements.
Represents minimum contributions to the Central States Teamsters Southeast and Southwest Area Pension Fund through 2023.

(5)

Represents purchase obligations for purchases of product in the normal course of business, for which all significant terms have been confirmed,
information technology commitments and forward fuel and electricity purchase obligations. The balance does not include fiscal year 2020 capital
additions expected to be between $325 million to $335 million, inclusive of approximately $80 million in fleet financing leases. See "Investing
Activities" above.

Other long-term liabilities as of December 28, 2019 as disclosed in Note 14, Accrued Expenses and Other Long-Term Liabilities, in our
consolidated financial statements, consist primarily of an uncertain tax position liability of $33 million, inclusive of interest and penalties,
for which the timing of payment is uncertain.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had entered into $254 million of letters of credit in favor of certain commercial insurers to secure obligations with respect to our self-
insurance programs, primarily under the ABL Facility as of December 28, 2019. Additionally, we entered into $66 million of letters of
credit to secure obligations with respect to certain of our real estate leases, primarily under the ABL Facility, and $1 million of letters of
credit for other obligations.

Except as disclosed above, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements that currently have or are reasonably likely to have a material
effect on our consolidated financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or
capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Except as otherwise set forth, we have prepared the financial information in this Annual Report in accordance with GAAP. Preparing
these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during these reporting periods. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors we believe
are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our most critical accounting policies and estimates pertain to the valuation of
goodwill and other intangible assets, vendor consideration and income taxes.

Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets include the cost of the acquired business in excess of the fair value of the tangible net assets recorded
in connection with each acquisition. Other intangible assets include customer relationships, non-compete agreements, the brand names
comprising our portfolio of private brands, and trademarks. We assess goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for
impairment each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. For goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets, our policy is to assess for impairment as of the beginning of each fiscal third quarter. For other intangible
assets with definite lives, we assess for impairment only if events occur that indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable.

For goodwill, the reporting unit used in assessing impairment is the Company’s one business segment as described in Note 25, Business
Information, in our consolidated financial statements. Our fiscal year 2019 assessment for impairment of goodwill was performed using
a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. In
performing the qualitative assessment, we identified and considered the significance of relevant key factors, events, and circumstances
that affect the fair value of its goodwill. These factors include external factors such as macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions,
as well as entity-specific factors, such as actual and planned financial performance. Based on our qualitative fiscal year 2019 annual
impairment analysis for goodwill, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value.

Our fair value estimates of the brand name and trademark indefinite-lived intangible assets are based on a relief from royalty method.
The fair value of each intangible asset is determined for comparison to the corresponding carrying value. If the carrying value of the asset
exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.

Based on our fiscal year 2019 annual impairment analysis for indefinite-lived intangible assets, we concluded that the fair value of our
trademark indefinite-lived intangible asset and brand name indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeded their respective carrying values by
substantial margins. These margins would not be materially impacted by a 50 basis point increase in the discount rate. The recoverability
of our indefinite-lived intangible assets could be impacted if estimated future cash flows are not achieved.

Due to the many variables inherent in estimating fair value and the relative size of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets,
differences in assumptions could have a material effect on the results of the Company’s impairment analysis in future periods.

Vendor Consideration

We participate in various rebate and promotional incentives with our suppliers, primarily through purchase-based programs. Consideration
under these incentives is estimated during the year based on purchasing activity, as our obligations under the programs are fulfilled
primarily when products are purchased. Consideration is typically received in the form of invoice deductions, or less often in the form
of cash payments. Changes in the estimated amount of incentives earned are treated as changes in estimates and are recognized in the
period of change. Historically, adjustments to our estimates for vendor consideration or related allowances have not been significant.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change
in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We record net
deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized.

An uncertain tax position is recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including
resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Uncertain tax positions are recorded at the largest
amount that is more likely than not to be sustained. We adjust the amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions when our judgment changes
as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. These differences are reflected as increases or decreases to
income tax expense in the period in which they are determined. The Company does not expect the liability for unrecognized tax benefits
to change significantly in the next 12 months.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 3, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in our consolidated financial
statements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and overall economic conditions. Our market risks include
interest rate risk and fuel price risk. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

Our debt exposes us to risk of fluctuations in interest rates. Floating rate debt, where the interest rate fluctuates periodically, exposes us
to short-term changes in market interest rates. Fixed rate debt, where the interest rate is fixed over the life of the instrument, exposes us
to changes in market interest rates reflected in the fair value of the debt and to the risk that we may need to refinance maturing debt with
new debt at higher rates. We manage our debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates and may employ
interest rate swaps as a tool to achieve that position. During fiscal year 2017, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to limit our
exposure to variable interest rate terms on certain borrowings under our Initial Term Loan Facility. The risks from interest rate swaps
include changes in the interest rates affecting the fair value of such instruments, potential increases in interest expense due to market
increases in floating interest rates and the creditworthiness of the counterparties.

After considering interest rate swaps that fixed the interest rate on $733 million of the principal amounts of our Initial Term Loan Facility,
approximately 65% of the principal amount of our debt bore interest at floating rates based on LIBOR or an alternative base rate, as
defined in our credit agreements, as of December 28, 2019. A hypothetical 1% change in the applicable rate would cause the interest
expense on our floating rate debt to change by approximately $31 million per year (see Note 13, Debt, in our consolidated financial
statements). As was announced in July 2017, the use of LIBOR is intended to be phased out by the end of 2021. We are unable to predict
the impact of using alternative reference rates and corresponding rate risk as of this time.

Fuel Price Risk

We are also exposed to risk due to fluctuations in the price and availability of diesel fuel. We require significant quantities of diesel fuel
for our vehicle fleet, and the price and supply of diesel fuel are unpredictable and fluctuate based on events outside our control, including
geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, regional production patterns, weather conditions and environmental
concerns. Increases in the cost of diesel fuel can negatively affect consumer confidence and discretionary spending and increase the prices
we pay for products, and the costs we incur to deliver products to our customers.

Our activities to minimize fuel cost risk include route optimization, improving fleet utilization and using fuel surcharges. We also enter
into forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected diesel fuel requirements. We had diesel fuel forward purchase
31

commitments totaling $96 million through April 2021 as of December 28, 2019. These lock in approximately 50% of our projected diesel
fuel purchase needs for the contracted periods. Our remaining fuel purchase needs will occur at market rates unless contracted for a fixed
price or hedged at a later date. Using current published market price projections for diesel and estimated fuel consumption needs, a
hypothetical 10% unfavorable change in diesel prices from the market price could result in approximately $9 million in additional fuel
cost on such uncommitted volumes through April 2021.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Fiscal Years Ended

December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended

December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017

Page No.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended

December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of US Foods Holding Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of US Foods Holding Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows, for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the
"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 28, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB),
the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 13, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, effective December 30, 2018, the Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases,
using the modified retrospective approach.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to
the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical
audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Vendor Consideration and Receivables - Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company receives rebates and incentives from certain suppliers, primarily through purchase-based programs. Consideration earned
under these incentives is estimated during the year based on purchasing activity, as obligations under the program are fulfilled primarily
as products are purchased. Consideration is typically received in the form of invoice reductions to be applied against the amounts owed
to the Company’s vendors, or less often in the form of cash payments. The purchase-based incentives are recorded as a reduction to
inventory as they are earned based on inventory purchases. As the related inventory is sold, the amounts are recorded as a reduction to
cost of sales.

Total vendor receivables were $143 million at December 28, 2019. Although many of these incentives are under long-term agreements
others are negotiated on an annual basis or shorter.

We identified vendor consideration as a critical audit matter due to the extent of audit effort required to evaluate whether vendor
consideration is recorded in accordance with the terms of the vendor agreements.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of the vendor agreements included the following, among others:

• We tested the effectiveness of certain controls over vendor consideration including management’s controls over the calculation of

the amount recorded and the accuracy of the contract information input in the system utilized to calculate the amounts.

• We selected a sample of vendor consideration recorded and (1) confirmed the amount recorded directly with the vendors and (2) for
certain products we recalculated vendor consideration amounts recorded by the Company using the terms of the executed vendor
agreement.

• We tested the amount of the vendor consideration recorded by developing an independent expectation for the amount based on
historical ratios experienced by the Company and comparing our expectation to the amount recorded by management in the current
year.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 13, 2020

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2006.

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except par value)

ASSETS
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $30 and $29

Vendor receivables, less allowances of $4 and $3

Inventories—net

Prepaid expenses

Assets held for sale

Other current assets

Total current assets

Property and equipment—net

Goodwill

Other intangibles—net

Deferred tax assets

Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:

Cash overdraft liability

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Current portion of long-term debt

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt

Deferred tax liabilities

Other long-term liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (Note 22)

Shareholders’ equity:

Common stock, $0.01 par value—600 shares authorized;
220 and 217 issued and outstanding as of
December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively

Additional paid-in capital

Retained earnings

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

1,455

143

1,432

109

3,262

2,075

4,728

967

—

256

104

1,347

106

1,279

106

2,979

1,842

3,967

324

11,288

9,186

222

1,460

538

142

2,362

4,594

308

315

7,579

2,845

916
(54)
3,709

157

1,359

454

106

2,076

3,351

298

232

5,957

2,780

531
(84)
3,229

9,186

11,288

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)

December 28,
2019

Fiscal Years Ended
December 29,
2018

December 30,
2017

Net sales

Cost of goods sold

Gross profit

Operating expenses:

Distribution, selling and administrative costs

Restructuring costs (benefit)

Total operating expenses

Operating income

Other expense (income)—net

Interest expense—net

Income before income taxes

Income tax provision (benefit)

Net income

Other comprehensive income—net of tax:

Changes in retirement benefit obligations

Unrecognized (loss) gain on interest rate swaps

Comprehensive income

Net income per share:

Basic

Diluted

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

Basic

Diluted

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

25,939

24,175

21,352

4,587

3,888

—

3,888

19,869

4,306

3,647

3,648

699

184

511
126

385

45
(15)
415

1.77

1.75

218

220

658
(13)
175

496
89

407

418

1.88

1.87

216

218

24,147

19,929

4,218

3,631
(1)
3,630

588

170

404
(40)
444

468

2.00

1.97

223

226

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions)

Number of
Common
Shares

Common
Shares at
Par Value

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Accumulated
Earnings
(Deficit)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

Total
Shareholders'
Equity

2,791

(136)

(119)

2,538

—

(28)

(96)

—

2,720

(6)

—

2,780

(5)

—

2,845

—

(184)

—

444

124

—

407

531

—

385

916

—

(95)

—

(28)

(280)

444

2,751

(6)

407

3,229

(5)

(15)

385

—

(84)

—

(15)

—

(54)

3,709

BALANCE-December 31, 2016

Share-based compensation expense

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

Exercise of stock options

Net share-settled stock options

Tax withholding payments for net share-settled equity awards

Common stock repurchased

Changes in retirement benefit obligations, net of income tax

Unrecognized gain on interest rate swaps, net of income tax

Net income

BALANCE-December 30, 2017

Share-based compensation expense

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

Exercise of stock options

Tax withholding payments for net share-settled equity awards

Changes in retirement benefit obligations, net of income tax

Unrecognized gain on interest rate swaps, net of income tax

Net income

BALANCE-December 29, 2018

Share-based compensation expense

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

Exercise of stock options

Tax withholding payments for net share-settled equity awards

Changes in retirement benefit obligations, net of income tax

Unrecognized loss on interest rate swaps, net of income tax

Net income

221

—

(10)

—

215

—

217

—

BALANCE-December 28, 2019

220

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

—

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

385

407

444

Fiscal Years Ended

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

December 30,
2017

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on disposal of property and equipment, net
Tangible asset impairment charges
Amortization of deferred financing costs
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
Share-based compensation expense
Provision for doubtful accounts

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:

Increase in receivables
Decrease (increase) in inventories
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and cash overdraft liability
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisition of businesses—net of cash
Proceeds from sales of divested assets
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
Purchases of property and equipment
Proceeds from redemption of industrial revenue bonds
Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from debt borrowings
Principal payments on debt and financing leases
Repayment of industrial revenue bonds
Payment for debt financing costs and fees
Contingent consideration paid for business acquisitions
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Tax withholding payments for net share-settled equity awards
Common stock repurchased
Common stock and share-based awards settled

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—beginning of year
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash—end of year
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Interest paid—net of amounts capitalized
Income taxes paid—net
Property and equipment purchases included in accounts payable
Leased assets obtained in exchange for financing lease liabilities
Leased assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities
Cashless exercise of stock options

Contingent consideration payable for acquisition of businesses

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

362
(1)
1
7
7
32
21

(19)
16
9
(56)
(4)
760

(1,832)
94
9
(258)
—
(1,987)

6,198
(4,967)
—
(44)
—
19
19
(5)
—
—
1,220
(7)
105
98

173
137
49
86
39
1

—

340
(1)
1
7
45
28
17

(71)
(72)
(45)
79
(126)
609

—
—
3
(235)
—
(232)

4,178
(4,595)
—
(1)
(5)
19
19
(6)
—
—
(391)
(14)
119
105

160
78
28
101
—
2

—

378
(4)
2
6
(123)
21
18

(67)
40
(24)
17
41
749

(182)
—
25
(221)
22
(356)

2,550
(2,651)
(22)
(1)
(6)
16
18
(28)
(280)
(1)
(405)
(12)
131
119

158
11
31
91
—
30

US FOODS HOLDING CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in tables in millions, except share and per share data, unless otherwise noted)

1. OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

US Foods Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to in these consolidated financial
statements and notes as “we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” or “US Foods.” US Foods Holding Corp. conducts all of its operations
through its wholly owned subsidiary US Foods, Inc. (“USF”) and its subsidiaries. All of the Company’s indebtedness, as further
described in Note 13, Debt, is a direct obligation of USF and its subsidiaries.

Business Description—The Company, through USF, operates in one business segment in which it markets and distributes fresh,
frozen and dry food and non-food products to foodservice customers throughout the U.S. These customers include independently
owned single and multi-unit restaurants, regional concepts, national restaurant chains, hospitals, nursing homes, hotels and motels,
country clubs, government and military organizations, colleges and universities, and retail locations.

Basis of Presentation—The Company operates on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, with all periods ending on a Saturday. When a 53-
week fiscal year occurs, the Company reports the additional week in the fiscal fourth quarter. The fiscal years ended December 28,
2019, December 29, 2018, and December 30, 2017, also referred to herein as fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, were
52-week fiscal years. Fiscal year 2020 will be a 53-week fiscal year. Prior year amounts may have been adjusted to conform with
the current year presentation.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation —The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of US Foods and its wholly
owned subsidiary, USF, and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates—The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). This requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three
or fewer months to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable —Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers in the ordinary course of business and are
recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Receivables are presented net of the allowance for doubtful accounts in
the Company's accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable
and determines the appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors. When the Company determines
that a loss is probable, a specific allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded, reducing the receivable to the net amount we reasonably
expect to collect. In addition, allowances are recorded for all other receivables based on historic collection trends, write-offs and
the aging of receivables. The Company uses specific criteria to determine uncollectible receivables to be written off, including
bankruptcy, accounts referred to outside parties for collection, and accounts past due over specified periods.

Vendor Consideration and Receivables—The Company participates in various rebate and promotional incentives with its
suppliers, primarily through purchase-based programs. Consideration earned is estimated during the year as the Company’s
obligations under the programs are fulfilled, which is primarily when products are purchased. Changes in the estimated amount of
incentives earned are recognized in the period of change.

Vendor consideration is typically deducted from invoices or collected in cash within 30 days of being earned. Vendor receivables
represent the uncollected balance of the vendor consideration. Since collections occur primarily from deducting the consideration
from the amounts due to the vendor, the Company does not experience significant collectability issues. The Company evaluates
the collectability of its vendor receivables based on specific vendor information and vendor collection history.

Inventories—The Company’s inventories, consisting mainly of food and other food-related products, are primarily considered
finished goods. Inventory costs include the purchase price of the product, freight charges to deliver it to the Company’s distribution
facilities, and depreciation and labor related to processing facilities and equipment, and are net of certain cash or non-cash
consideration received from vendors. The Company assesses the need for valuation allowances for slow-moving, excess and
obsolete inventories by estimating the net recoverable value of such goods based upon inventory category, inventory age, specifically
identified items, and overall economic conditions.

The Company records inventories at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. The base year values
of beginning and ending inventories are determined using the inventory price index computation method. This “links” current costs
to original costs in the base year when the Company adopted LIFO. As of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, LIFO
reserves in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were $152 million and $130 million, respectively. As a result of changes

in LIFO reserves, cost of goods sold increased $22 million in fiscal year 2019, was de minimis in fiscal year 2018, and increased
$14 million in fiscal year 2017.

Property and Equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 40 years. Property and equipment under
financing leases and leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the remaining term of the
related lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Applicable interest charges incurred during the construction
of new facilities or development of software for internal use are capitalized as one of the elements of cost and are amortized over
the useful life of the respective assets.

Property and equipment held and used by the Company are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability
of property and equipment, the Company compares the carrying value of the asset or asset group to the estimated, undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by the long-lived asset or asset group. If the future cash flows do not exceed the carrying
value, the carrying value is compared to the fair value of such asset. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment
charge is recorded for the excess.

The Company also assesses the recoverability of its closed facilities actively marketed for sale. If a facility’s carrying value exceeds
its fair value, less an estimated cost to sell, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. Assets held for sale are not depreciated.

Impairments are recorded as a component of restructuring costs (benefit) in the Company's Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, and a reduction of the asset’s carrying value in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—Goodwill includes the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the
tangible and other intangible net assets acquired. Other intangible assets include customer relationships, noncompete agreements,
the brand names comprising the Company’s portfolio of exclusive brands, and trademarks. Brand names and trademarks are
indefinite-lived intangible assets and, accordingly, are not subject to amortization, but are subject to impairment assessments as
described below.

The Company assesses goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually, or more frequently if
events occur that indicate an asset may be impaired. For goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company’s policy is
to assess for impairment as of the beginning of each fiscal third quarter. For intangible assets with definite lives, the Company
assesses impairment only if events occur that indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. All goodwill
is assigned to the consolidated Company as the reporting unit.

Self-Insurance Programs—The Company estimates its liabilities for claims covering general, fleet, and workers’ compensation.
Amounts in excess of certain levels, which range from $1 million to $10 million per occurrence, are insured as a risk reduction
strategy, to mitigate catastrophic losses. The workers’ compensation liability is discounted, as the amount and timing of cash
payments is reliably determinable given the nature of benefits and the level of historic claim volume to support the actuarial
assumptions and judgments used to derive the expected loss payment pattern. The amount accrued is discounted using an interest
rate that approximates the U.S. Treasury rate consistent with the duration of the liability. The inherent uncertainty of future loss
projections could cause actual claims to differ from our estimates.

We are primarily self-insured for group medical claims not covered under multiemployer health plans covering certain of our union-
represented employees. The Company accrues its self-insured medical liability, including an estimate for incurred but not reported
claims, based on known claims and past claims history. These accruals are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities
and other long-term liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Share-Based Compensation—The Company measures compensation expense for stock-based awards at fair value as of the date
of grant, and recognizes compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest. Forfeitures are recognized as
incurred. Fair value is the closing price per share for the Company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Prior to the Company's 2016 initial public offering, the grant date fair value of stock-based awards was measured as of the end of
each fiscal quarter using the combination of a market and income approach. The computed value was applied to all stock and stock
award activity in the subsequent fiscal quarter.

Compensation expense related to our employee stock purchase plan, which allows eligible employees to purchase our common
stock at a discount of up to 15% represents the difference between the fair market value as of acquisition date and the employee
purchase price.

Business Acquisitions—The Company accounts for business acquisitions under the acquisition method. Assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. The operating results of the acquired companies are included
in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Cost of Goods Sold—Cost of goods sold includes amounts paid to vendors for products sold, net of vendor consideration, including
in-bound freight necessary to bring the products to the Company’s distribution facilities. Depreciation related to processing facilities

and equipment is presented in cost of goods sold. Because the majority of the inventories are finished goods, depreciation related
to warehouse facilities and equipment is presented in distribution, selling and administrative costs. See “Inventories” above for
discussion of the LIFO impact on cost of goods sold.

Shipping and Handling Costs—Shipping and handling costs, which include costs related to the selection of products and their
delivery to customers, are presented in distribution, selling and administrative costs. Shipping and handling costs were $1.8 billion,
$1.7 billion, and $1.6 billion in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Income Taxes—The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This requires the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is
recognized in income during the period that includes the enactment date. Net deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent the
Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized.

An uncertain tax position is recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including
resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Uncertain tax positions are recorded at the
largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained. The Company adjusts the amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions
when its judgment changes, as a result of evaluating new information not previously available. These differences are reflected as
increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they are determined.

Derivative Financial Instruments— The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to assist in managing its exposure to
variable interest rates on certain borrowings. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading
or speculative purposes. Interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance
Sheet at fair value.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into forward purchase agreements to procure fuel, electricity and product
commodities related to its business. These agreements often meet the definition of a derivative. However, the Company does not
measure its forward purchase commitments at fair value as the amounts under contract meet the physical delivery criteria in the
normal purchase exception.

Concentration Risks—Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash equivalents are invested primarily in money market funds at major
financial institutions. Credit risk related to accounts receivable is dispersed across a larger number of customers located throughout
the U.S. The Company attempts to reduce credit risk through initial and ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial
condition. There were no receivables from any one customer representing more than 5% of our consolidated gross accounts
receivable as of December 28, 2019.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-02,
Income Statement, Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income. This new guidance permits an entity to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of
2017 (the “Tax Act”) on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The Company adopted this
guidance as of the beginning of fiscal year 2019 and elected not to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Act from accumulated
other comprehensive income to retained earnings.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 840, Leases, and has issued subsequent amendments to Topic 842. The Company adopted Topic 842 on December 30,
2018, the effective and initial application date, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company elected from the package
of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within Topic 842, which, among other things, allowed the Company
to carry forward the historical lease classification. Adoption of Topic 842 resulted in the recording of net lease assets and lease
liabilities of approximately $100 million, as of December 30, 2018. The initial adoption of Topic 842 did not materially impact the
Company’s Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company has
revised its relevant policies and procedures, as applicable, to meet the new accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements of
Topic 842. See Note 17, Leases.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,
which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to

the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption
permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the provisions of the new standard to materially affect its financial position
or results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which
provides new guidance on the accounting for implementation, set-up, and other upfront costs incurred in a hosted cloud computing
arrangement. Under the new guidance, entities will apply the same criteria for capitalizing implementation costs as they would for
an internal-use software license arrangement. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. This ASU can be adopted prospectively to eligible costs
incurred on or after the date of adoption or retrospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of this standard on a prospective
basis at the beginning of fiscal year 2020. The Company's adoption of the provisions of the new standard did not materially affect
its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses
on Financial Instruments, which requires entities to use a forward-looking, expected loss model to estimate credit losses. It also
requires additional disclosure related to credit quality of trade and other receivables, including information related to management’s
estimate of credit allowances. ASU 2016-13 was further amended in November 2018 by ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements
to Topic 236, Financial Instrument-Credit Losses. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2016-13 will be initially applied through a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company has substantially
completed its analysis of the effects of adopting the provisions of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and does
not expect the adoption of the provisions of the new standard to materially affect its financial position or results of operations.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company recognizes revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied, which occurs when a customer obtains control of
the promised goods or services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration which the Company expects to be
entitled to receive in exchange for these goods or services. The Company generates substantially all of its revenue from the
distribution and sale of food and food-related products and recognizes revenue when title and risk of loss passes and the customer
accepts the goods, which occurs at delivery. Customer sales incentives such as volume-based rebates or discounts are treated as a
reduction of revenue at the time the revenue is recognized. Sales taxes invoiced to customers and remitted to governmental authorities
are excluded from net sales. Shipping and handling costs are treated as fulfillment costs and included in distribution, selling and
administrative costs.

The Company did not have any material outstanding performance obligations, contract liabilities or capitalized contract acquisition
costs as of December 28, 2019. Customer receivables, which are included in accounts receivable, less allowances in the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $1.5 billion and $1.3 billion as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively.

The Company has certain customer contracts under which incentives are paid upfront to its customers. These payments have become
industry practice and are not related to financing any customer’s business, nor are they associated with any distinct good or service
to be received from any customer. These incentive payments are capitalized in prepaid expenses and other assets and amortized as
a reduction of revenue over the life of the contract or as goods or services are transferred to the customer. The Company’s contract
assets for these upfront payments were $35 million and $37 million included in prepaid expenses in the Company’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively, and $39 million and $28 million included in other
assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively.

The following table presents the disaggregation of revenue for each of the Company’s principal product categories:

Meats and seafood
Dry grocery products
Refrigerated and frozen grocery products
Dairy
Equipment, disposables and supplies
Beverage products
Produce

2019

2018

2017

9,313
4,427
4,253
2,685
2,483
1,403
1,375

8,635
4,239
3,898
2,520
2,298
1,315
1,270

8,692
4,266
3,799
2,533
2,243
1,306
1,308

25,939

24,175

24,147

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

On September 13, 2019, USF completed the $1.8 billion all cash acquisition of five foodservice companies (the “Food Group”)
from Services Group of America, Inc.: Food Services of America, Inc., Systems Services of America, Inc., Amerifresh, Inc.,
Ameristar Meats, Inc. and GAMPAC Express, Inc. The acquisition of the Food Group expands the Company’s network in the West
and Northwest parts of the U.S.

USF financed the acquisition with borrowings under a new $1.5 billion incremental senior secured term loan facility, as further
described in Note 13, Debt, and with borrowings under its revolving credit facilities. The assets, liabilities and results of operations
of the Food Group have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the date the acquisition was
completed.

As a condition to receiving regulatory clearance for the acquisition from the Federal Trade Commission, USF divested three Food
Group distribution facilities (the "Divested Assets"). The total amount of proceeds received from the October 11, 2019 sale of the
Divested Assets at closing was $94 million, which, together with approximately $20 million in holdback funds and working capital
adjustments, approximates the fair value of the Divested Assets. The assets and liabilities of the Divested Assets were included in
assets of discontinued operations and liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively, in the Company's Consolidated Balance
Sheets until their disposition. The operating results of the Divested Assets from the date the acquisition was completed through
the date of sale were de minimis.

The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation recognized for the acquisition based upon preliminary
estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Adjustments to the preliminary purchase price allocation in
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, including working capital adjustments to acquired and divested assets and liabilities and
adjustments to asset valuations, were immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to further adjustment as additional information becomes available and final
valuations are completed. There can be no assurances that these final valuations and additional analyses and studies will not result
in significant changes to the preliminary estimates of fair value set forth below.

Accounts receivable
Inventories
Assets of discontinued operations
Other current assets
Property and equipment
Goodwill(1)
Other intangibles(2)
Other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Liabilities of discontinued operations
Other long-term liabilities, including financing leases

Cash paid for acquisition

Preliminary
Purchase Price
Allocation

145
165
133
7
209
761
695
47
(200)
(69)
(19)
(42)
1,832

(1)

(2)

Goodwill recognized is primarily attributable to expected synergies from the combined company, as well as intangible assets that do not qualify
for separate recognition. The acquired goodwill is deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Other intangibles consist of customer relationships of $656 million with estimated useful lives of 15 years and indefinite-lived brand names and
trademarks of $39 million.

Net sales and net loss for the Food Group (exclusive of the Divested Assets, as the sales and net income of the Divested Assets
were reflected in discontinued operations and were de minimis for fiscal year 2019), which have been included in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income since the date the acquisition was completed were $843 million and
$21 million, respectively, during fiscal year 2019. Acquisition-related costs included in distribution, selling and administrative
costs in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $52 million and $29 million for fiscal years 2019
and 2018, respectively.

The following table presents the Company’s unaudited pro forma consolidated net sales, net income and net income per share for
fiscal years 2019 and 2018. The unaudited pro forma financial information includes the historical results of operations of the
Company and the Food Group, giving effect to the acquisition and related financing as if they had occurred as of December 31,
2017, which was the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2018.

Pro forma net sales

Pro forma net income

Pro forma net income per share:

Basic

Diluted

2019
(Unaudited)

2018
(Unaudited)

28,020

398

1.82

1.81

26,985

397

1.84

1.82

The unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods presented above excludes the results of operations related to the
Divested Assets, as the results of operations related to the Divested Assets were reflected as discontinued operations. Unaudited
pro forma net sales, net income and net income per share related to the Divested Assets for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 are as
follows:

Pro forma net sales

Pro forma net income

Pro forma income per share:

Basic

Diluted

2019
(Unaudited)

2018
(Unaudited)

392

0.03

0.02

516

0.06

The unaudited pro forma financial information above includes adjustments for: (1) incremental depreciation expense related to
fair value increases of certain acquired property and equipment, (2) amortization expense related to the fair value of intangible
assets acquired, (3) interest expense related to the borrowings under the new incremental senior secured term loan facility and
revolving credit facilities used to finance the acquisition, (4) the elimination of acquisition-related costs that were included in the
Company’s historical results, and (5) adjustments to the income tax provision based on pro forma results of operations. No effect
has been given to potential synergies, operating efficiencies or costs arising from the integration of the Food Group in our previously
existing operations. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results
that would have been achieved had the pro forma events taken place on the date indicated. Further, the pro forma financial
information does not purport to project the Company’s future consolidated results of operations following the acquisition.

RESTRICTED CASH

Restricted cash primarily consists of cash on deposit with financial institutions as collateral for certain letters of credit. Cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash as presented in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of December 28, 2019
and December 29, 2018 consisted of the following:

Cash and cash equivalents

Restricted cash—included in other assets

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

104

105

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

A summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the last three fiscal years is as follows:

Balance as of beginning of year

Charged to costs and expenses

Customer accounts written off—net of recoveries

Balance as of end of year

2019

2018

2017

21
(20)
30

17
(14)
29

18
(17)
26

This table excludes the vendor receivable related allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 million as of December 28, 2019 and
$3 million as of both December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FINANCING PROGRAM

Under its accounts receivable financing facility (the “ABS Facility”), USF sells, on a revolving basis, eligible receivables to a
wholly owned, special purpose, bankruptcy remote subsidiary (the “Receivables Company”). The Receivables Company, in turn,
grants a continuing security interest in all of its rights, title and interest in the eligible receivables to the administrative agent, for
the benefit of the lenders. The Company consolidates the Receivables Company and, consequently, the transfer of the eligible
receivables is a transaction internal to the Company and the eligible receivables have not been derecognized from the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Included in the Company’s accounts receivable balance as of December 28, 2019 and December 29,
2018 was approximately $1.0 billion of eligible receivables held as collateral in support of the ABS Facility. See Note 13, Debt,
for a further description of the ABS Facility.

ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

The Company classifies its closed facilities as assets held for sale at the time management commits to a plan to sell the facility,
the facility is actively marketed and available for immediate sale, and the sale is expected to be completed within one year. Due
to market conditions, certain facilities may be classified as assets held for sale for more than one year as the Company continues
to actively market the facilities at reasonable prices.

During fiscal year 2019, two closed distribution facilities and an excess parcel of land were sold for aggregate proceeds of $6 million,
which approximated their aggregate carrying values. During fiscal year 2018, the Company closed a distribution facility and
transferred its business activities to another of the Company's distribution facilities. Additionally, an excess portion of a parcel of
land, purchased earlier in fiscal year 2018, was transferred to assets held for sale, along with an operating facility that was closed
due to the consolidation of operations into a recently acquired facility.

The changes in assets held for sale for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

Balance as of beginning of year
Transfers in
Assets sold
Tangible asset impairment charges
Balance as of end of the year

2019

2018

7
—
(6)
—
1

5
3
—
(1)
7

10. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 consisted of the following:

Land
Buildings and building improvements
Transportation equipment
Warehouse equipment
Office equipment, furniture and software
Construction in process

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
Property and equipment—net

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

Range of
Useful Lives

378
1,411
1,137
481
867
99
4,373
(2,298)
2,075

323
1,252
1,031
418
858
77
3,959
(2,117)
1,842

10–40 years
5–10 years
5–12 years
3–7 years

Transportation equipment included $572 million and $544 million of financing lease assets as of December 28, 2019 and
December 29, 2018, respectively. Buildings and building improvements included $30 million and $36 million of financing lease
assets as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. Accumulated amortization of financing lease assets was
$269 million and $247 million as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. Interest capitalized was $2 million
for fiscal years 2019 and 2018.

Depreciation and amortization expense of property and equipment, including amortization of financing lease assets, was
$311 million, $300 million and $283 million for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

11. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

Goodwill includes the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of the tangible and other intangible net assets acquired.
Other intangible assets include customer relationships, noncompete agreements, the brand names comprising the Company’s
portfolio of exclusive brands, and trademarks. Brand names and trademarks are indefinite-lived intangible assets and, accordingly,
are not subject to amortization, but are subject to impairment assessments as described below.

Customer relationships and noncompete agreements are intangible assets with definite lives, and are carried at the acquired fair
value less accumulated amortization. Customer relationships and noncompete agreements are amortized over the estimated useful
lives (which are 2 to 15 years). Amortization expense was $51 million, $40 million and $95 million for fiscal years 2019, 2018
and 2017, respectively. The weighted-average remaining useful life of all customer relationship intangibles was approximately 8
years as of December 28, 2019. Amortization of these customer relationship assets is estimated to be $68 million for fiscal year
2020, $51 million fiscal year 2021, $44 million for each of fiscal years 2022, 2023 and 2024, and $423 million in the aggregate
thereafter.

Goodwill and other intangibles consisted of the following:

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

4,728

3,967

Goodwill
Other intangibles—net

Customer relationships—amortizable:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying value
Noncompete agreements—amortizable:
Gross carrying amount
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying value
Brand names and trademarks—not amortizing

Total other intangibles—net

789
(115)
674

3
(2)
1
292

967

154
(85)
69

3
(1)
2
253

324

The increase in goodwill and other intangible assets as of December 28, 2019 is attributable to the Food Group acquisition, as
described in Note 5, Business Acquisitions.

The Company assesses goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually, or more frequently if
events occur that indicate an asset may be impaired. For goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company’s policy is
to assess for impairment as of the beginning of each fiscal third quarter. For intangible assets with definite lives, the Company
assesses impairment only if events occur that indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company
completed its most recent annual impairment assessment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2019,
the first day of the third quarter of fiscal year 2019, with no impairments noted.

For goodwill, the reporting unit used in assessing impairment is the Company’s one business segment as described in Note 25,
Business Information. The Company performed the annual goodwill impairment assessment using a qualitative approach to
determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. In performing the qualitative
assessment, the Company identified and considered the significance of relevant key factors, events, and circumstances that affect
the fair value of its goodwill. These factors include external factors such as market conditions, macroeconomic, and industry, as
well as entity-specific factors, such as actual and planned financial performance. Based upon the Company’s qualitative fiscal year
2019 annual goodwill impairment analysis, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill
exceeded its carrying value and there is no risk of impairment.

The Company’s fair value estimates of the brand names and trademarks indefinite-lived intangible assets are based on a relief-
from-royalty method. The fair value of these intangible assets is determined for comparison to the corresponding carrying value.
If the carrying value of these assets exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess. Based
upon the Company’s fiscal year 2019 annual impairment analysis, the Company concluded the fair value of its brand names and
trademarks exceeded its carrying value.

Due to the many variables inherent in estimating fair value and the relative size of the recorded indefinite-lived intangible assets,
differences in assumptions may have a material effect on the results of the Company’s impairment analysis in future periods.

12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company follows the accounting standards for fair value, under which fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-
specific measurement. The Company’s fair value measurements are based on the assumptions that market participants would use
in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, fair value
accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

•

Level 1—observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets

Level 2—observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active or inactive markets that are observable either directly or indirectly, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data

Level 3—unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its
own assumptions

Any transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy will be recognized as of the
end of the reporting period in which the transfer occurs. There were no transfers between fair value levels in any of the periods
presented below.

The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018,
aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, were as follows:

Liabilities

Interest rate swaps

Assets

Money market funds

Interest rate swaps

Level 1

December 28, 2019
Level 3
Level 2

Total

— $

December 29, 2018

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

—

— $

—

— $

There were no significant assets or liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Money Market Funds

Money market funds include highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three or fewer months. They are valued using
quoted market prices in active markets and are classified under Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, to manage its exposure to interest rate movements in
connection with its variable-rate Initial Term Loan Facility (as defined in Note 13, Debt).

On August 1, 2017, USF entered into four-year interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $1.1 billion, reducing to
$825 million in the fourth year. These swaps effectively converted approximately half of the principal amount of the Initial Term
Loan Facility from a variable to a fixed rate loan.

On May 31, 2019, an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $367 million was terminated, and the Company
received cash proceeds of $1 million, the fair value of the interest rate swap on the termination date. The proceeds were recorded
as cash provided by operating activities in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The $1 million gain from the
termination of the interest rate swap agreement was reflected in accumulated other comprehensive loss and will be amortized to
interest expense through July 31, 2021, the remaining term of the original interest rate swap agreement.

After giving effect to the termination of the interest rate swap agreement, the remaining interest rate swap agreements collectively
have a notional value of $733 million, reducing to $550 million on July 31, 2020. The Company pays an aggregate effective rate
of 3.45% on the notional amount of the Initial Term Loan Facility covered by the interest rate swap agreements, comprised of a
rate of 1.70% plus a spread of 1.75% (See Note 13, Debt).

The Company records its interest rate swaps in its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, based on projections of cash flows
and future interest rates. The determination of fair value includes the consideration of any credit valuation adjustments necessary,
giving consideration to the creditworthiness of the respective counterparties and the Company. The following table presents the
balance sheet location and fair value of the interest rate swaps as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018:

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Interest rate swaps
Interest rate swaps

Interest rate swaps

Balance Sheet Location

Other current assets
Other noncurrent assets
Total
Other long-term liabilities
Net position

Fair Value

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

— $
—
—
1
(1) $

8
11
19
—
19

Gains and losses on the interest rate swaps are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest
expense during the period in which the hedged transaction affects income. The following table presents the effect of the Company’s
interest rate swaps in its Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2019,
December 29, 2018, and December 30, 2017:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2019

Interest rate swaps

For the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018

Interest rate swaps

For the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017

Interest rate swaps

Amount of (Loss)
Gain Recognized in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss, net of tax

Location of Amounts
Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss

Amount of (Gain)
Loss Reclassified
from Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss to Income,
net of tax

(10)

Interest expense—net

(5)

(2)

During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that a de minimis amount will be reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to income.

Other Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, cash overdraft liability, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their
fair values due to their short-term maturities.

The fair value of the Company’s total debt approximated its carrying value of $4.7 billion and $3.5 billion as of December 28,
2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s 5.875% unsecured Senior Notes due June 15, 2024
(the “Senior Notes”) was $0.6 billion as of both December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, based upon the closing market prices
of the Senior Notes on both dates, and is classified under Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the balance of the
Company’s debt is primarily classified under Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, with fair value estimated based upon a combination
of the cash outflows expected under these debt facilities, interest rates that are currently available to the Company for debt with
similar terms, and estimates of the Company’s overall credit risk.

13. DEBT

Total debt consisted of the following:

Debt Description
ABL Facility
ABS Facility
Initial Term Loan Facility (net of $4 and $6
of unamortized deferred financing costs,
respectively)

Incremental Term Loan Facility (net of $35 of
unamortized deferred financing costs)
Senior Notes (net of $4 and $5
of unamortized deferred financing costs,
respectively)
Obligations under financing leases
Other debt
Total debt
Current portion of long-term debt(4)
Long-term debt

Maturity
May 31, 2024
September 21, 2022

Interest Rate as of
December 28,
2019
4.75%
2.75%

June 27, 2023

3.44%

September 13, 2026

3.69%

June 15, 2024
2020–2026
2021–2031

5.88%
2.00% - 6.17%
5.75% - 9.00%

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

— $
190

81 (1)
275 (2)

2,125

1,465

596
352
8
4,736
(142)
4,594

2,145 (3)

—

595
352
9
3,457
(106)
3,351

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Consists of outstanding borrowings under our former asset based senior secured revolving credit facility, which was refinanced with a new facility
in May 2019 (as described below).
Consists of outstanding borrowings under the ABS Facility prior to a September 2019 amendment to, among other things, lower the interest rate
margin on borrowings under the facility (as described below).
Consists of outstanding borrowings under the Initial Term Loan Facility prior to a November 2019 amendment to, among other things, lower the interest
rate margins on borrowings under the facility (as described below).
The current portion of long-term debt as of December 28, 2019 for the Initial Term Loan Facility and the Incremental Term Loan Facility includes
five quarterly principal payments due to the Company's 53-week fiscal year 2020.

As of December 28, 2019, after considering interest rate swaps that fixed the interest rate on $733 million of principal of the Initial
Term Loan Facility described below, approximately 65% of the Company’s total debt was at a floating rate.

Principal payments to be made on outstanding debt, exclusive of deferred financing costs, as of December 28, 2019, were as follows:

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter

142
114
284
2,128
655
1,456
4,779

ABL Facility—On May 31, 2019, USF completed a refinancing of its asset based senior secured revolving credit facility with a
new asset based senior secured revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility provides USF with loan commitments
having a maximum aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion. The ABL Facility includes subfacilities for the issuance of up to
$800 million of letters of credit and up to $170 million of swing line loans. Extensions of credit under the ABL Facility are subject
to availability under a borrowing base comprised of various specified percentages of the value of eligible accounts receivable,
eligible inventory, eligible transportation equipment and certain unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, which also serve as collateral
for borrowings under the ABL Facility.

Borrowings under the ABL Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at USF's option, either the sum of an alternative base rate, as
described under the ABL Facility, plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50%, or the sum of a London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) plus a margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%, in each case based on USF’s excess availability under the ABL Facility. The
margin under the ABL Facility as of December 28, 2019 was 0.00% for alternative base rate loans and 1.00% for LIBOR loans.
The ABL Facility also carries a commitment fee of 0.25% per annum on the average unused amount of the commitments under
the ABL Facility. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings for the ABL Facility and our former asset based
senior secured revolving credit facility was 2.63% and 5.12% for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The ABL Facility is scheduled to mature on May 31, 2024, subject to a springing maturity date in the event that more than
$300 million of aggregate principal amount of indebtedness with a maturity date on or prior to the ABL Facility’s maturity date
under the Initial Term Loan Facility and Incremental Term Loan Facility or the Senior Notes remains outstanding on a date that
is 60 days prior to the maturity date for the Initial Term Loan Facility, the Incremental Term Loan Facility or the Senior Notes,
respectively.

The Company incurred $4 million of lender fees and third party costs in connection with the refinancing of the asset based senior
secured revolving credit facility on May 31, 2019, which were capitalized as deferred financing costs. These deferred financing
costs, along with $1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs related to the former asset based senior secured revolving
credit facility, will be amortized through May 31, 2024, the ABL Facility maturity date.

USF had no outstanding borrowings, and had issued letters of credit totaling $314 million, under the ABL Facility as of December 28,
2019. Outstanding letters of credit included: (1) $249 million issued in favor of certain commercial insurers to secure USF’s
obligations with respect to its self-insurance program, (2) $64 million issued to secure USF’s obligations with respect to certain
real estate leases, and (3) $1 million issued for other obligations. There was available capacity of $1,227 million under the ABL
Facility as of December 28, 2019.

ABS Facility—On September 20, 2019, the ABS Facility was amended to, among other things, lower the interest rate margin on
borrowings under the facility. The maximum borrowing capacity under the ABS Facility is $800 million. USF had $190 million
of outstanding borrowings under the ABS Facility as of December 28, 2019. The Company, at its option, can request additional
borrowings up to the maximum commitment, provided sufficient eligible receivables are available as collateral. There was available
capacity of $552 million under the ABS Facility as of December 28, 2019.

Borrowings under the ABS Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 0.95%, and the ABS Facility carries an unused
commitment fee of 0.35% or 0.45% based on USF's utilization of the ABS Facility. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding
borrowings for the ABS Facility was 3.23% and 3.00% for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The ABS Facility is scheduled
to mature on September 21, 2022. The Company incurred $1 million of lender fees and third party costs in connection with the
amendment of the ABS Facility on September 20, 2019, which were capitalized as deferred financing costs and will be amortized
through September 21, 2022, the ABS Facility maturity date.

Term Loan Facilities

The Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2011 (as amended, the “Term Loan Credit Agreement’), provides USF
with a senior secured term loan (the "Initial Term Loan Facility"), an incremental senior secured term loan issued in September
2019 (the “Incremental Term Loan Facility”) and the right to request incremental senior secured term loan commitments.

Initial Term Loan Facility

On November 26, 2019, the Initial Term Loan Facility was amended to, among other things, lower the interest rate margins on
outstanding borrowings under the facility. The Initial Term Loan Facility had an outstanding balance of $2.1 billion as of
December 28, 2019.

Borrowings under the Initial Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at USF’s option, either (1) LIBOR plus
a margin of 1.75% or (2) an alternative base rate plus a margin of 0.75%. The table above reflects the December 28, 2019 interest
rate on the unhedged portion of the Initial Term Loan Facility. The effective interest rate of the portion of the Initial Term Loan
Facility subject to interest rate swap agreements was 3.45% as of December 28, 2019.

In connection with the November 2019 amendment of the Initial Term Loan Facility, the Company applied modification accounting
to the majority of the continuing lenders as the terms of the facility were not substantially different from the terms that applied to
those lenders prior to the amendment. For the remaining lenders, the Company applied debt extinguishment accounting. The
Company recorded a debt extinguishment loss of $2 million in interest expense, consisting primarily of a write-off of unamortized
deferred financing costs related to the amendment. Unamortized deferred financing costs of $4 million were carried forward and
will be amortized through June 27, 2023, the maturity date of the Initial Term Loan Facility.

The Initial Term Loan Facility is scheduled to mature on June 27, 2023. Borrowings under the Initial Term Loan Facility may be
voluntarily prepaid without penalty or premium, other than customary breakage costs related to prepayments of LIBOR-based
borrowings and a 1.00% premium in the case of any “repricing transaction” that occurs prior to May 26, 2020. The Initial Term
Loan Facility may require mandatory repayments if certain assets are sold.

Incremental Term Loan Facility

On September 13, 2019, USF entered into a new incremental term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion under the
Term Loan Credit Agreement (the “Incremental Term Loan Facility”) to finance a portion of the purchase price for its acquisition
of the Food Group.

Borrowings under the Incremental Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at USF’s option, either the sum
of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%, or the sum of an alternative base rate, as described under the Incremental Term Loan Facility,
plus a margin of 1.00%.

The Incremental Term Loan Facility is scheduled to mature on September 13, 2026. Similar to the Initial Term Loan, borrowings
under the Incremental Term Loan Facility may be voluntarily prepaid without penalty or premium, other than customary breakage
costs related to prepayments of LIBOR-based borrowings and a 1.00% premium in the case of any “repricing transaction” that
occurs prior to March 13, 2020. The Incremental Term Loan Facility may require mandatory repayments if certain assets are sold.

Senior Notes—The Senior Notes due 2024, had a carrying value of $596 million, net of $4 million of unamortized deferred
financing costs, as of December 28, 2019. The Senior Notes bear interest at 5.875%. As of June 15, 2019, this debt is redeemable,
at USF’s option, in whole or in part at a price of 102.938% of the remaining principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
the redemption date. On June 15, 2020 and June 15, 2021, the optional redemption price for the debt declines to 101.469% and
100.0%, respectively, of the remaining principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date.

Financing Leases—Obligations under financing leases of $352 million as of December 28, 2019 consist primarily of amounts
due for transportation equipment and building leases.

Security Interests

Substantially all of the Company’s assets are pledged under the various agreements governing our indebtedness. Debt under the
ABS Facility is secured by certain designated receivables and, in certain circumstances, by restricted cash. The ABL Facility is
secured by certain designated receivables not pledged under the ABS Facility, as well as inventory and certain owned transportation
equipment and certain unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, the lenders under the ABL Facility have a second
priority interest in all of the capital stock of USF and its subsidiaries and substantially all other non-real estate assets of USF and
its subsidiaries not pledged under the ABS Facility. USF’s obligations under the Initial Term Loan Facility and the Incremental
Term Loan Facility are secured by all the capital stock of USF and its subsidiaries and substantially all the non-real estate assets
of USF and certain of its subsidiaries not pledged under the ABS Facility. Additionally, the lenders under the Initial Term Loan
Facility and the Incremental Term Loan Facility have a second priority interest in the inventory and certain transportation equipment
pledged under the ABL Facility. USF’s interest rate swap obligations are secured by the collateral securing the ABL Facility. Pursuant
to the terms of the interest rate swap agreements between the interest rate swap counterparty and USF, the interest rate swap
counterparty has agreed that its right to receive payment from the sale of the collateral is subordinate to the rights of the lenders
under the ABL Facility.

Debt Covenants

The agreements governing our indebtedness contain customary covenants. These include, among other things, covenants that
restrict our ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends, or engage in mergers or
consolidations. USF had approximately $1.3 billion of restricted payment capacity under these covenants, and approximately
$2.4 billion of its net assets were restricted after taking into consideration the net deferred tax assets and intercompany balances
that eliminate in consolidation as of December 28, 2019.

The agreements governing our indebtedness also contain customary events of default. Those include, without limitation, the failure
to pay interest or principal when it is due under the agreements, cross default provisions, the failure of representations and warranties
contained in the agreements to be true when made, and certain insolvency events. If an event of default occurs and remains uncured,

the principal amounts outstanding, together with all accrued unpaid interest and other amounts owed, may be declared immediately
due and payable. Were such an event to occur, the Company would be forced to seek new financing that may not be on as favorable
terms as its existing debt. The Company’s ability to refinance its indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all, is directly affected by
the then prevailing economic and financial conditions. In addition, the Company’s ability to incur secured indebtedness (which
may enable it to achieve more favorable terms than the incurrence of unsecured indebtedness) depends in part on the value of its
assets. This, in turn, is dependent on the strength of its cash flows, results of operations, economic and market conditions, and
other factors.

14. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:

Salary, wages and bonus expenses
Operating expenses
Workers’ compensation, general and fleet liability
Group medical liability
Customer rebates and other selling expenses
Property and sales tax
Operating lease liability
Interest payable
Other

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Other long-term liabilities:

Workers’ compensation, general and fleet liability
Operating lease liability
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefit obligations
Uncertain tax positions
Other

Total Other long-term liabilities

December 28,
2019

December 29,
2018

172
75
44
25
105
37
40
14
26
538

121
131
7
33
23
315

132
69
39
28
96
30
6
13
41
454

120
21
40
31
20
232

Self-Insured Liabilities —The Company is self-insured for general liability, fleet liability and workers’ compensation claims.
Claims in excess of certain levels are insured by external parties. The workers’ compensation liability, included in the table above
under “Workers’ compensation, general liability and fleet liability,” is recorded at present value. This table summarizes self-
insurance liability activity for the last three fiscal years:

Balance as of beginning of the year

Charged to costs and expenses

Acquisition

Reinsurance recoverable

Payments

Balance as of end of the year

Discount rate

2019

2018

2017

159
80

—
(91)
165

170
56

—

7
(74)
159

164
64

—

8
(66)
170

1.58%

2.50%

1.98%

Estimated future payments for self-insured liabilities are as follows:

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total self-insured liability
Less amount representing interest
Present value of self-insured liability

15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

44
28
19
13
10
58
172
(7)
165

During fiscal year 2017, the Company completed four secondary offerings of its common stock held primarily by investment funds
associated with or designated by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC (“CD&R”) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P. (“KKR”
and, together with CD&R, the “Former Sponsors”). Following the completion of the final offering in December 2017, the Former
Sponsors no longer held any shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the offerings.
The December 2017 offering also included the Company’s repurchase of 10,000,000 shares of common stock from the underwriter
at $28.00 per share, which was the price the underwriter purchased the shares from the Former Sponsors in the offering. The
$280 million paid for the share repurchase reduced additional paid-in capital $96 million, with the remaining $184 million recognized
in retained earnings as a constructive dividend.

The closing of the Company’s share repurchase occurred substantially concurrently with the closing of the offering, and the
repurchased shares were retired. In accordance with terms of the prior registration rights agreement with the Former Sponsors, the
Company incurred approximately $4 million of expenses in connection with the offerings in fiscal year 2017.

There were no related party transactions in fiscal years 2019 and 2018.

16. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION, COMMON STOCK ISSUANCES AND COMMON STOCK

Our long-term incentive plans provide for the grant of various forms of share-based awards to our directors, officers and other
eligible employees.

Total compensation expense related to share-based arrangements was $32 million, $28 million and $21 million for fiscal years
2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and is reflected in distribution, selling and administrative costs in the Company's Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income. The total income tax benefit associated with share-based compensation recorded in the
Company's Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income was $8 million, $6 million and $7 million for fiscal years 2019,
2018 and 2017, respectively.

In addition, the Company sponsors an employee stock purchase plan to provide eligible employees with the opportunity to acquire
shares of our common stock at a discount of 15% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of purchase, and as
such, the plan is considered compensatory for federal income tax purposes. The Company recorded $4 million, $3 million and
$3 million of share-based compensation expense for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, associated with the employee
stock purchase plan.

Stock Options—Certain directors, officers and other eligible employees have been granted time-based stock options (the “Time-
Based Options”) and performance-based options (the “Performance Options” and, together with the Time-Based Options, the
“Options”) to purchase shares of our common stock.

The Time-Based Options generally vest and become exercisable ratably over periods of three to four years, from the date of the
grant. Share-based compensation expense related to the Time-Based Options was $8 million, $7 million and $4 million for fiscal
years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Performance Options generally vest and become exercisable ratably over four years, from the date of the grant, provided that
the Company achieves a predetermined financial performance goal established by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors (the “Committee”) for the respective award tranche.

The Company recorded share-based compensation expense of $1 million and $3 million for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively,
related to the expected vesting of the Performance Options. No share-based compensation expense attributable to Performance
Options was recorded for fiscal year 2019 as the final tranche of those awards was not expected to vest since the performance goal
was not met.

The Options are nonqualified, with exercise prices equal to the estimated fair value of a share of common stock as of the date of
the grant. Exercise prices range from $8.51 to $38.12 per share and generally have a 10-year life. The fair value of each Option is
estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The weighted-average assumptions for Options granted in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 are included in the following table:

Expected volatility
Expected dividends
Risk-free interest rate
Expected term (in years)

2019

2018

2017

23.7%
—
2.3%
5.6

35.7%
—
2.6%
5.4

31.8%
—
1.9%
5.8

Expected volatility is calculated leveraging the historical volatility of public companies similar to US Foods. The assumed dividend
yield is zero because the Company has not historically paid dividends. The risk-free interest rate is the implied zero-coupon yield
for U.S. Treasury securities having a maturity approximately equal to the expected term, as of the grant date. Due to a lack of
relevant historical data, the simplified approach was used to determine the expected term of the options.

The summary of Options outstanding and changes during fiscal year 2019 are presented below:

Outstanding as of December 29, 2018

Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Performance adjustment(1)

Outstanding as of December 28, 2019
Vested and exercisable as of December 28, 2019

Time
Options
2,713,564
922,893
(688,964)
(176,643)

Performance
Options
1,222,832
195,692
(443,875)
(30,268)
— (192,929)
751,452
438,297

2,770,850
1,132,637

Weighted-
Average
Total
Fair Value
Options
9.45
$
3,936,396
10.63
$
1,118,585
(1,132,839) $
7.58
(206,911) $
10.78
(192,929) $
15.31
10.03
$
3,522,302
8.43
$
1,570,934

Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
22.44
32.60
18.11
29.22
23.19
26.62
21.89

$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Years

7.2
6.0

(1) Represents an adjustment to the 2018 tranche of the 2016 Performance Option awards based on actual performance during the 2018 annual
performance period. The actual performance for the 2018 annual performance period was certified by the Compensation Committee of our Board
of Directors in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of Options granted for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $10.63, $14.55 and $11.08,
respectively.

During fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, Options were exercised with total intrinsic values of $21 million, $28 million and
$86 million, respectively, representing the excess of fair value over exercise price.

There was $11 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested Options expected to vest as of December 28,
2019, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of two years.

Restricted Stock Awards—Certain officers have been granted restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), some of which vest ratably over
a three-year period from the date of grant (the “Time-Based RSA”) and others which vest to the extent certain performance conditions
are met (the “Performance RSAs”).

The Company recorded share-based compensation expense for the Time-Based RSAs of $1 million for fiscal year 2019. No Time-
Based RSAs had been issued for periods prior to fiscal year 2019.

The Performance RSAs were granted assuming the maximum level of performance and vest on the third anniversary of the grant
date if specific performance goals over a three-year performance period are achieved. The number of shares eligible to vest on the
vesting date range from zero to 200% of the target award amount, based on the achievement of the performance goals. The fair
value of the Performance RSAs is measured using the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and recognized
over the three-year vesting period for the portion of the award that is expected to vest. Compensation expense for the Performance
RSAs is remeasured as of the end of each reporting period, based on management’s evaluation of whether it is probable that
performance conditions will be met.

Share-based compensation expense for the Performance RSAs was $3 million, $2 million and $1 million for fiscal years 2019,
2018 and 2017, respectively.

The summary of unvested RSAs and changes during fiscal year 2019 is presented below:

Unvested as of December 29, 2018
Granted
Unvested as of December 28, 2019

Time-Based
RSAs

—
116,713
116,713

Performance
RSAs
448,823
233,426
682,249

Total RSAs
448,823
350,139
798,962

$
$
$

Weighted-
Average
Fair
Value

32.01
34.56
33.13

The weighted-average grant date fair value for the RSAs granted in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $34.56, $33.56 and
$30.39, respectively. There was $7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the RSAs as of December 28, 2019,
that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.

Restricted Stock Units—Certain directors, officers and other eligible employees have been granted time-based restricted stock
units (the “Time-Based RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (the “Performance RSUs” and, collectively with the
Time-Based RSUs, the “RSUs”). The Time-Based RSUs generally vest ratably over three to four years, starting on the anniversary
date of the grant. For fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized $14 million, $12 million and $6 million, respectively,
in share-based compensation expense related to the Time-Based RSUs.

The Performance RSUs generally vest over a three or four year period, as and to the extent predetermined performance goals are
met.

The fair value of each share underlying the Performance RSUs is measured at the fair market value of our common stock on the
date of grant and recognized over the vesting period for the portion of the award that is expected to vest. Compensation expense
for the Performance RSUs is remeasured as of the end of each reporting period, based on management’s evaluation of whether it
is probable that the performance conditions will be met.

The Company recognized $2 million, $3 million and $3 million of share-based compensation expense in fiscal years 2019, 2018
and 2017, respectively, for the Performance RSUs.

A summary of RSUs outstanding and changes during fiscal year 2019 is presented below.

Unvested as of December 29, 2018

Granted

Vested

Forfeited
Performance adjustment (1)
Unvested as of December 28, 2019

Time-Based
RSUs

Performance
RSUs

Total
RSUs

Weighted-
Average
Fair
Value

1,036,841

481,599
(440,604)
(150,662)
—

927,174

356,716

186,825

—
(65,142)
(46,398)
432,001

1,393,557

668,424
$
(440,604) $
(215,804) $
(46,398) $
$

1,359,175

30.71

35.09

28.39

32.65

32.85

33.24

(1)

Represents an adjustment to the 2018 tranche of the 2016 Performance Option awards based on actual performance during the 2018 annual
performance period. The actual performance for the 2018 annual performance period was certified by the Compensation Committee of our Board
of Directors in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019.

The weighted-average grant date fair values for the RSUs granted in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $35.09, $33.48 and
$29.77, respectively.

As of December 28, 2019, there was $25 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the RSUs that is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of two years.

17. LEASES

The Company leases certain distribution and warehouse facilities, office facilities, fleet vehicles, and office and warehouse
equipment. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and recognizes a financing or operating lease liability
and right-of-use (“ROU”) asset in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized
based on the present value of future minimum lease payments over the lease term as of commencement date. For the Company’s
leases that do not provide an implicit borrowing rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information
available as of commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The lease terms may include options to

extend, terminate or buy out the lease. When it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise these options, they are included
in ROU assets and the estimated lease liabilities. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the Company's
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for separately. For office and
warehouse equipment leases, the Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. Variable
lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate, such as insurance and property taxes, are excluded from the measurement
of the lease liability and are recognized as variable lease cost when the obligation for that payment is incurred.

The following table presents the location of the ROU assets and lease liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 28, 2019:

Leases

Assets

Operating

Financing

Total leased assets

Liabilities

Current:
Operating

Financing

Noncurrent:

Operating

Financing

Total lease liabilities

Consolidated Balance Sheet Location

December 28,
2019

Other assets
Property and equipment-net(1)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Current portion of long-term debt

Other long-term liabilities

Long-term debt

145

333

478

131

257

523

(1) Financing lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $269 million as of December 28, 2019.

The following table presents the location of lease costs in fiscal year 2019 in the Company's Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income:

Lease Cost

Operating lease cost

Financing lease cost:

Amortization of leased assets

Interest on lease liabilities

Variable lease cost

Net lease cost

Statement of Comprehensive Income Location

2019

Distribution, selling and administrative costs

Interest expense-net

Distribution, selling and administrative costs

Future lease payments under lease agreements as of December 28, 2019 were as follows:

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

After 2024

Total lease payments
Less amount representing interest

Present value of lease liabilities

Financing
Lease
Obligation

106

Total

Operating
Leases

33
30

203
(32)
171

62
58

380
(28)
352

123

154

122

95
88

583
(60)
523

Future minimum lease payments in effect as of December 29, 2018 under noncancelable lease arrangements, as determined prior
to the adoption of Topic 842, were as follows:

Future Minimum Lease Payments

Operating
Leases

Financing
Leases

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

After 2023

Total lease payments

Less amount representing interest

Present value of minimum lease payments

155
(4)
151

Other information related to lease agreements for fiscal year 2019 was as follows:

Cash Paid For Amounts Included In Measurement of Liabilities

Operating cash flows from operating leases

Operating cash flows from financing leases

Financing cash flows from financing leases

Total

385
(33)
352

2019

129

118

101

540
(37)
503

Lease Term and Discount Rate

Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):

Operating leases

Financing leases

Weighted-average discount rate:

Operating leases

Financing leases

18. RETIREMENT PLANS

December 28,
2019

6.14

4.85

4.4%

3.5%

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan and 401(k) plan for eligible employees, and provides certain postretirement
health and welfare benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents.

Company Sponsored Defined Benefit Plans —The Company sponsors the US Foods Consolidated Defined Benefit Retirement
Plan, a qualified defined benefit retirement plan (the "Retirement Plan"), that pays benefits to certain employees at the time of
retirement, using actuarial formulas based upon a participant’s years of credited service and compensation. The Company also
maintains postretirement health and welfare plans for certain employees. Amounts related to the Retirement Plan and other
postretirement plans recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements are determined on an actuarial basis.

The components of net periodic pension benefit costs (credits) for the Retirement Plan the last three fiscal years were as follows:

Components of net periodic pension benefit costs (credits):

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of net loss
Settlements

Net periodic pension benefit costs (credits)

2019

2018

2017

2
37
(49)
4
12
6

2
36
(52)
3
—
(11) $

2
40
(48)
4
18
16

Other postretirement benefit costs were de minimis for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.

The service cost component of net periodic benefit costs (credits) is included in distribution, selling and administrative costs, while
the other components of net periodic benefit costs (credits) are included in other expense (income)—net in the Company's
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The Company did not make a significant contribution to the Retirement Plan in fiscal year 2019. The Company contributed
approximately $71 million to the Retirement Plan during fiscal year 2018, of which $35 million represented an additional, voluntary
contribution. As a result of the incremental voluntary contribution, the Company remeasured its defined benefit pension liability
as of May 31, 2018, resulting in a reduction in the benefit obligation of $33 million, with a corresponding benefit to accumulated
other comprehensive loss. The remeasurement had an immaterial impact on the annual net periodic benefit costs (credits) for fiscal
year 2018.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company completed a voluntary lump sum settlement offer to certain terminated plan
participants who held vested accrued benefits under a certain threshold amount. In addition, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2019, the Company completed a spin-off of liabilities associated with certain active participants with small accrued benefits and
retirees into a separate plan and immediately terminated that plan. As a result of the termination of the spin-off of the plan, those
participants were able to elect to receive immediate lump sum payouts, with any remaining liabilities transferred to an insurance
company through the purchase of an annuity contract. Pension obligation settlement payments of $66 million related to these
transactions, consisting of lump sum payments and the annuity contract premium, were paid from plan assets. The Company
incurred non-cash settlement charges of $12 million in fiscal year 2019, including approximately $9 million in the fourth quarter
when the settlement payments were paid. The other $3 million of settlement charges incurred during fiscal year 2019 relate to
ordinary course lump sum payment elections as provided under the continuing plan. The Company also incurred non-cash settlement
charges of $18 million in fiscal year 2017 from a voluntary lump sum settlement offer to certain terminated plan participants. No
non-cash settlement charges were incurred in fiscal year 2018. Settlement charges are included in other expense (income)—net in
the Company's Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for pension benefits for the last
three fiscal years were as follows:

Changes recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

Actuarial gain
Amortization of net loss
Settlements

Net amount recognized

2019

2018

2017

44
4
12
60

6
3
—
9

—
4
18
22

Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for other postretirement benefits
for the last three fiscal years were de minimis.

The funded status of the Retirement Plan for the last three fiscal years was as follows:

Change in benefit obligation:

Benefit obligation as of beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial loss (gain)
Settlements
Benefit disbursements

Benefit obligation as of end of year

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets as of beginning of year
Return on plan assets
Employer contribution
Settlements
Benefit disbursements

Fair value of plan assets as of end of year

Net funded status

Pension Benefits
2018

2019

2017

871
2
37
100
(84)
(23)
903

836
193
1
(84)
(23)
923

976
2
36
(97)
—
(46)
871

851
(40)
71
—
(46)
836

966
2
40
76
(87)
(21)
976

799
124
36
(87)
(21)
851

(35) $

(125)

The fiscal year 2019 pension benefits actuarial loss of $100 million was primarily due to a decrease in the discount rate. The fiscal
year 2018 pension benefits actuarial gain of $97 million was primarily due to an increase in the discount rate. The fiscal year 2017
pension benefits actuarial loss of $76 million was primarily due to a decrease in the discount rate.