UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________
Commission File Number: 001-38067
Verona Pharma plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
United Kingdom
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
98-1489389
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3 More London Riverside
London SE1 2RE United Kingdom
(Address of principal executive offices)
Not Applicable
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +44 203 283 4200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Ordinary shares, nominal value £0.05 per share*
Trading
Symbol
VRNA
Name of each exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Market)
* The ordinary shares are represented by American Depositary Shares (each representing 8 ordinary shares), which are exempt from the operation
of Section 12(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to Rule 12a-8 thereunder.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes
☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☐
☒
Accelerated filer
Small reporting company
Emerging growth company
☐
☒
☒
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section
13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15
U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the registrant's voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was
approximately $251.3 million as of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed
second fiscal quarter. Solely for purposes of this disclosure, shares held by executive officers, directors and certain
shareholders of the registrant as of such date have been excluded because such persons or entities may be deemed to
be affiliates of the registrant.
As of March 1, 2022, the registrant had 482,944,390 ordinary shares, nominal value £0.05 per share, outstanding,
which if all held in ADS form, would be represented by 60,368,049 American Depositary Shares, each representing
eight (8) ordinary shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement that the registrant intends to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 2022 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated
herein.
GENERAL INFORMATION
All references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), to “Verona,” the “company,” the
"group", “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Verona Pharma plc and its consolidated subsidiaries. In this Annual Report,
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is referred to as the “SEC”, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is
referred to as the “Securities Act” and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is referred to as the
“Exchange Act.”
TRADEMARKS, TRADENAMES AND SERVICE MARKS
This Annual Report may include trademarks, tradenames and service marks that are the property of other
organizations. Solely for convenience, trademarks and tradenames referred to in this Annual Report appear without
the ® and ™ symbols, but those references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the
fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or that the applicable owner will not assert its rights, to these
trademarks and tradenames.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,”
“intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the
negative of these terms or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these
words. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report, including without
limitation statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plans
and objectives of management for future operations, the development of ensifentrine or any other product
candidates, including statements regarding the expected initiation, timing, progress and availability of data from our
clinical trials and potential regulatory approvals, research and development costs, timing and likelihood of success,
potential collaborations, the duration of our patent portfolio, our estimates regarding expenses, future revenues,
capital requirements, debt service obligations and our need for additional financing, the funding we expect to
become available under the Term Loan and from cash receipts from U.K. tax credits, and the sufficiency of our cash
and cash equivalents to fund operations, are forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are only predictions and are based largely on our current
expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this
Annual Report and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including
the important factors described under the sections in this Annual Report entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in our other filings with the SEC.
Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be
predicted or quantified and some of which are beyond our control, you should not rely on these forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements
may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from
time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Except as required by
applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein,
whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise. We intend the
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-
looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.
This Annual Report contains market data and industry forecasts that were obtained from industry publications.
These data involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such
estimates. We have not independently verified any third-party information. While we believe the market position,
market opportunity and market size information included in this Annual Report is generally reliable, such
information is inherently imprecise.
SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk
Factors” in this Annual Report. You should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties when investing in our
ADSs. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:
• We have a limited operating history and have never generated any product revenue;
• We will need additional funding to complete development of any future product candidates, or development of
other formulations or target indications of ensifentrine, and to commercialize our products, including
ensifentrine, if approved;
•
Changes in our tax rates, unavailability of certain tax credits or reliefs or exposure to additional tax liabilities or
assessments could affect our profitability, and audits by tax authorities could result in additional tax payments
for prior periods;
• We depend solely on the success of ensifentrine, our only product candidate under development;
•
•
The COVID-19 pandemic has and may continue to adversely impact our business;
Our Phase 3 ENHANCE clinical program is being conducted at clinical trial sites in 16 countries, including
Russia, and business interruptions and trade sanctions resulting from geo-political actions may impact our
timelines and costs of our Phase 3 program and delay our planned NDA submission;
• We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the
development and commercialization of our product candidates;
•
•
Ensifentrine may have serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects which may delay or prevent
marketing approval;
If we are unable to enroll patients in our clinical trials, or enrollment is slower than anticipated, our research and
development efforts could be adversely affected;
• We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims, either when testing ensifentrine in the clinic
or at the commercial stage, and our product liability insurance may not cover all damages from such claims;
•
•
•
Regulatory approval processes are lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are
ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for ensifentrine, our business will be substantially harmed;
Enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and
commercialize ensifentrine and may affect the prices we may set;
Our business operations and current and future relationships with investigators, healthcare professionals,
consultants, third-party payors and customers will be subject to applicable healthcare regulatory laws, which
could expose us to penalties;
• We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing industry, which may result in others discovering,
developing or commercializing competing products before or more successfully than we do;
• We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties, including independent clinical investigators and clinical
research organizations, to conduct our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials;
•
•
The collaboration and license agreement with Nuance Pharma is important to our business. If Nuance Pharma is
unable to develop and commercialize products containing ensifentrine in Greater China, if we or Nuance
Pharma fail to adequately perform under the Nuance Agreement, or if we or Nuance Pharma terminate the
Nuance Agreement, our business would be adversely affected.
If we fail to enter into new strategic relationships for ensifentrine, our business, research and development and
commercialization prospects could be adversely affected;
• We currently rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for production of the active pharmaceutical
ingredient ensifentrine and its derived formulated products. Our dependence on these third parties may impair
the advancement of our research and development programs and the development of ensifentrine;
• We rely on patents and other intellectual property rights to protect ensifentrine, the enforcement, defense and
maintenance of which may be challenging and costly;
• We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration
of a third-party patent which might adversely affect our ability to develop, manufacture and market ensifentrine;
• We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce patents covering ensifentrine, which could be expensive,
time consuming and unsuccessful, and issued patents could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in
court;
•
Our future growth and ability to compete depends on our ability to retain our key personnel and recruit
additional qualified personnel;
• We expect to expand our development, regulatory and sales and marketing capabilities, and as a result, we may
encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations;
•
The price of our American Depositary Shares may be volatile and may fluctuate due to factors beyond our
control; and
• We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company in the United States, and
our senior management are required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate
governance practices.
Table of Contents
Page
Part I
Item 1
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
Part II
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
[Reserved]
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
Part III
Other Information
Disclosures Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Item 12.
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Part IV
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
1
23
66
66
66
66
66
68
68
80
80
80
81
81
82
82
82
82
82
83
87
88
Item 1. Business
OVERVIEW
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative
therapeutics for the treatment of respiratory diseases with significant unmet medical needs. Our product candidate,
ensifentrine, is a first-in-class, inhaled, dual inhibitor of the phosphodiesterase (“PDE”) 3 and PDE4 enzymes, which
is designed to act as both a bronchodilator and an anti-inflammatory agent.
Initially, we are developing inhaled ensifentrine for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(“COPD”), a common, chronic, progressive, and life-threatening respiratory disease without a cure. If successfully
developed, ensifentrine would be the first therapeutic with a novel mode of action for COPD in over a decade.
During 2021, we made substantial progress in our Phase 3 ENHANCE (“Ensifentrine as a Novel inHAled Nebulized
COPD thErapy”) clinical program. Patient enrollment completed in the 48-week subset of the ENHANCE-1 trial in
December 2021 and in the ENHANCE-2 trial in January 2022. Complete enrollment in the 24-week subset of
ENHANCE-1 is expected around the end of the second quarter of 2022. We expect to report top-line data from
ENHANCE-2 in the third quarter of 2022 and from ENHANCE-1 around the end of 2022. Conditional upon positive
results, we intend to submit a New Drug Application (“NDA”) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
in the first half of 2023.
If approved, we intend to commercialize inhaled ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of COPD via a standard
jet nebulizer in the United States (“US”). Outside the US, we intend to license ensifentrine to companies with
expertise and experience in developing and commercializing products in those regions. To that end, we have entered
into a strategic collaboration with Nuance Pharma Limited, a Shanghai-based specialty pharmaceutical company
(“Nuance Pharma”), to develop and commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China.
In Phase 2 clinical trials, ensifentrine has demonstrated positive results in patients with COPD, asthma and cystic
fibrosis (“CF”). We are developing ensifentrine in three formulations for the most widely used inhalation devices:
nebulizer, dry powder inhaler (“DPI”) and pressurized metered-dose inhaler (“pMDI”). Ensifentrine has shown
positive Phase 2 data in COPD trials when delivered by each of these formulations.
Our near term operating focus is the ongoing ENHANCE program, related chemistry, manufacturing and controls,
regulatory efforts and early pre-commercial activities. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December
31, 2021, together with funding expected to become available under the Term Loan and expected cash receipts from
the U.K. tax credit, will enable us to fund our planned operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements
through at least the end of 2023.
Overview of COPD and current treatments
COPD is a common, chronic, progressive, and life-threatening respiratory disease without a cure. It damages the
airways and lungs, leading to debilitating breathlessness, hospitalizations, and death. COPD has a major impact on
everyday life. Patients struggle with basic activities such as getting out of bed, showering, eating, and walking.
Worldwide, COPD affects approximately 384 million people and is the third leading cause of death, according to the
World Health Organization.
The goal of COPD pharmacological therapy is to improve patients’ quality of life by reducing symptoms, decreasing
the quantity and severity of exacerbations (often an escalation of symptoms) and to improve patients’ ability to
function (GOLD 2021).
For approximately 40 years, the treatment of COPD has been dominated by three classes of inhaled therapies
approved for use by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”): anti-muscarinics, beta-agonists and
inhaled corticosteroids (“ICSs”). COPD patients are frequently treated with bronchodilators, including long-acting
anti-muscarinics (“LAMAs”) and long-acting beta-agonists (“LABAs”), to relieve airway constriction and make it
easier to breathe. In addition, patients at risk for exacerbations may be prescribed ICSs to prevent them.
Certain COPD patients are treated with the oral PDE4 inhibitor, roflumilast (Daliresp®), which has demonstrated a
reduction in exacerbation risk in patients with severe chronic bronchitis. However, oral PDE4 therapy results in
systemic exposure which has been associated with unfavorable gastrointestinal side-effects such as nausea, emesis,
diarrhea, abdominal pain, loss of appetite and weight loss.
COPD treatments are often combined in patients who remain uncontrolled on one or two therapies. These include
LAMA/LABA combinations or LAMA/LABA/ICS combinations. Unfortunately, clinical data suggests that 40-60%
1
of patients on dual or triple therapy still experience significant symptoms of COPD, including breathlessness. These
chronic recurring symptoms limit their daily activities and impair quality of life. Despite receiving maximum
therapy, it is estimated that more than 1 million patients in the U.S. alone remain symptomatic. For these patients, no
available inhaled therapies offer treatment options beyond standard LAMA / LABA and ICS combinations. New
treatment options are urgently needed to help improve lung function, symptoms, and overall quality of life in these
patients.
Ensifentrine
Ensifentrine is a first-in-class, inhaled, dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor. This dual inhibition enables it to act as a
bronchodilator and an anti-inflammatory agent in a single compound. Importantly, this therapeutic profile
differentiates it from existing classes of bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory treatments. We are not aware of any
other single compound in clinical development or approved by the FDA nor the European Commission for the
treatment of respiratory diseases that acts both as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory agent. If successfully
developed and approved, ensifentrine has the potential to be the first novel class of therapeutic in COPD in over 10
years and the only bronchodilator option as an add-on to existing dual / triple therapy.
Ensifentrine has demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both lung function and COPD
symptoms, including breathlessness, in our prior Phase 2 clinical studies in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
In addition, ensifentrine showed further improved lung function and reduced lung volumes in patients taking
standard short- and long-acting bronchodilator therapy, including maximum bronchodilator treatment with dual/
triple therapy.
Safety profile
Ensifentrine has demonstrated a safety profile similar to placebo in clinical trials involving more than 1,400 people
to date. Additionally, ensifentrine did not prolong the QT interval or impact other cardiac conduction parameters in a
thorough QT study in healthy volunteers. It is delivered directly to the lungs by inhalation to maximize pulmonary
exposure to ensifentrine while minimizing systemic exposure. This feature minimizes any systemic side-effects such
as the gastrointestinal disturbance associated with oral PDE4 inhibitors. In addition, in non-clinical trials ensifentrine
has demonstrated high selectivity for PDE3 and PDE4 over other enzymes and receptors, which is believed to
minimize off-target effects.
Differentiated profile
By inhibiting PDE3 and PDE4, ensifentrine impacts three key mechanisms in respiratory disease: bronchodilation,
inflammation and mucociliary clearance. Ensifentrine is designed to increase the levels of cellular cAMP and cGMP
in smooth muscle cells and inflammatory cells, resulting in bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects.
Ensifentrine is also designed to stimulate the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (“CFTR”), which
is an ion channel in the epithelial cells lining the airways. Mutations in the CFTR protein result in poorly or non-
functioning ion channels, which cause CF and are potentially important in COPD. CFTR stimulation leads to
improved electrolyte balance in the lung and thinning of the mucus, which facilitates mucociliary clearance and
leads to improved lung function and potentially a reduction in lung infections.
Dual inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 has shown enhanced or synergistic effects compared with inhibition of either
PDE alone on contraction of airway smooth muscle and suppression of inflammatory mediator release in several
preclinical studies. We believe these enhanced effects may increase the utility of ensifentrine in the treatment of
respiratory diseases including COPD, asthma and CF.
2
We believe ensifentrine has the potential to address the large unmet need in treating COPD with its improvement in
lung function, COPD symptoms and meaningful improvement in quality of life.
Clinical data
Ensifentrine has demonstrated improvements in lung function, symptoms and quality of life with or without
background therapy in two 4-week, Phase 2b dose-ranging clinical trials in moderate to severe COPD patients. In
both studies ensifentrine was well tolerated at all doses with an adverse event profile similar to placebo:
•
•
In March 2018, we reported positive top-line results with ensifentrine as monotherapy from our first Phase 2b
trial in 403 patients. The trial evaluated four doses of nebulized ensifentrine (0.75 mg, 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 6 mg)
or placebo twice daily over 4 weeks. Patients withheld use of regular long-acting bronchodilator therapy for the
duration of the study. The trial met its primary endpoint of improved lung function with ensifentrine
demonstrating a clinically and statistically significant increase in peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second
(“FEV1”) at week 4 compared to placebo. In addition, clinically relevant secondary endpoints were met
including significant progressive improvements in COPD symptoms.
In January 2020, we reported positive top-line results with ensifentrine added on to background therapy from
our second Phase 2b trial in 413 patients. This trial evaluated four doses of nebulized ensifentrine (0.375 mg,
0.75 mg, 1.5 mg and 3 mg) or placebo added on to treatment with once-daily tiotropium (Spiriva® Respimat®), a
commonly used LAMA bronchodilator, in symptomatic patients with moderate to severe COPD who required
additional treatment. The trial met its primary endpoint of improved lung function, with ensifentrine plus
tiotropium demonstrating a clinically and statistically significant dose-dependent improvement in peak FEV1
and FEV1 over 12 hours with ensifentrine at week 4, compared to placebo plus tiotropium. Additionally,
clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in health-related quality of life were observed
with ensifentrine added on to tiotropium.
3
In May 2020, the FDA provided guidance on key features of our pivotal Phase 3 clinical program in response to our
End-of-Phase 2 briefing package for nebulized ensifentrine as a maintenance treatment for COPD. This included
clarity on the dose, primary and secondary endpoints, patient population and program design.
In September 2020, we initiated our ENHANCE Phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized
ensifentrine in patients with moderate to severe COPD. The two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
studies (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) are designed to evaluate ensifentrine as monotherapy and added onto a
single bronchodilator.
Each study is expected to enroll approximately 800 moderate to severe, symptomatic COPD patients at sites
primarily in the U.S. and Europe. The two study designs will replicate measurements of efficacy and safety data
over 24 weeks but ENHANCE-1 will also evaluate longer-term safety in 400 patients over 48 weeks. The primary
endpoint is improvement in lung function measured by FEV1 over 12 hours with ensifentrine after 12 weeks of
treatment. Key secondary endpoints include measurements of COPD symptoms and health-related quality of life
through 24 weeks assessed via the validated patient reported outcome tools, E-RS and SGRQ. Additional lung
function endpoints including peak and morning trough FEV1 will also be assessed. Exacerbations will be analyzed
by individual study and in a pooled analysis.
Patient enrollment completed in the 48-week subset of the ENHANCE-1 trial in December 2021 and in the
ENHANCE-2 trial in January 2022. Complete enrollment in the 24-week subset of ENHANCE-1 is expected around
the end of the second quarter of 2022. We expect to report top-line data from ENHANCE-2 in the third quarter of
2022 and from ENHANCE-1 around the end of 2022. Conditional upon positive results, we intend to submit an
NDA to the FDA in the first half of 2023.
4
Formulations
Verona Pharma has developed formulations of ensifentrine for the three most widely used inhalation devices:
nebulizer, DPI and pMDI. The nebulized formulation of ensifentrine is designed to be suitable for use in a standard
jet nebulizer, not a proprietary device. Delivery of COPD medications by nebulizer is important because such
medications can be used by adults of almost any age and dexterity and regardless of peak inspiratory flow, offering
advantages to patients who may struggle to operate handheld inhaler devices or have low peak inspiratory flow. DPI
and pMDI handheld inhaler formats are relatively portable and convenient and are also important delivery
mechanisms.
While we continue to focus on development of the nebulized formulation of ensifentrine, we believe the
development of pMDI and DPI formulations of ensifentrine provides additional lifecycle opportunities including
new potential indications, formulation combinations and collaborations. In February 2021, we reported positive
results from the second, multiple dose part of a Phase 2 trial with pMDI ensifentrine in patients with moderate to
severe COPD. Ensifentrine delivered by pMDI met all of the primary and secondary lung function endpoints. The
improvement in lung function was dose-ordered and statistically significant at peak and over the 12-hour dosing
interval compared with placebo, and supports twice-daily dosing of ensifentrine via pMDI for the treatment of
COPD. Data from the single dose part of the study were reported in March 2020.
Verona Pharma has successfully demonstrated proof of concept in Phase 2 COPD trials with all three formulations.
In addition, the data from Phase 2 trials were consistent across the three formulations. All three dosing forms have
demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in lung function and duration of
action, supporting twice-daily dosing and a safety profile similar to placebo.
Pipeline
The following table summarizes our development programs.
5
Potential additional indications for ensifentrine
Cystic fibrosis and asthma
In addition to COPD, we believe ensifentrine has potential applications in other respiratory diseases including CF
and asthma.
CF is a progressive, fatal genetic disease without a cure and a median age of death of 46 years. The condition is
characterized by thick, sticky mucus that damages many of the body’s organs. It causes repeat and persistent lung
infections that result in frequent exacerbations and hospitalizations. Other symptoms include malnutrition,
constipation and diarrhea, and some adults develop diabetes, arthritis and liver problems.
CF is the most common fatal inherited disease in the U.S. and Europe. More than 70,000 people worldwide are
living with CF and approximately 1,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, according to the Cystic Fibrosis
Foundation. The U.S. and European regulatory authorities consider CF to be a rare, or orphan, disease and provide
incentives to encourage development of effective new treatments.
CF patients endure multiple daily medications, taking an average of seven per day, including inhaled and injected
treatments to clear mucus and fight infections as well as enzyme pills to digest food. Ultimately, selected patients
have lung transplants.
In a Phase 2a clinical trial, a single dose of nebulized ensifentrine demonstrated an improvement in lung function in
patients with CF. In addition, in preclinical studies, ensifentrine activated the cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator (“CFTR”), which is beneficial in reducing mucous viscosity and improving mucociliary
clearance. We believe these data support the continued development of ensifentrine as a potential therapy for CF.
Asthma is a common lung condition that causes sporadic breathing difficulties. The disease causes narrowing and
swelling of the airways leading to symptoms including difficulty breathing, wheezing, coughing and tightness in the
chest. Exposure to triggers such as allergens or irritants can lead to asthma attacks.
Asthma attacks vary in severity and frequency. More than 300 million people worldwide suffer from asthma and it is
the most common chronic disease among children, according to the World Health Organization.
6
Although there is no cure, symptoms may be prevented by avoiding triggers and through established maintenance
therapies including bronchodilators, ICS, anti-IgE agents and leukotriene inhibitors.
Ensifentrine has shown potential in a Phase 2a clinical trial in asthma. The data from this trial, published in October
2019 in the journal Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, demonstrated that ensifentrine produced dose-
dependent improvements in bronchodilation that were comparable to current rescue medication, high dose nebulized
albuterol. Importantly, ensifentrine was well tolerated and patients experienced fewer systemic effects than those
receiving albuterol.
COVID-19
While our initial focus remained on the treatment of COPD, we evaluated ensifentrine as a potential treatment option
for COVID-19. In April 2021, we reported results from a pilot study with pMDI ensifentrine showing ensifentrine
added on to standard of care was well tolerated in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The 45 patient study was
not powered to identify statistically significant efficacy outcomes and no clinical efficacy benefit with ensifentrine
added on to standard of care was observed. We do not plan to conduct further studies of ensifentrine in the treatment
of COVID-19.
Our team
Our expert team has decades of experience in developing and commercializing respiratory therapeutics including the
following COPD therapeutics: Advair®; Anoro Ellipta®; Breo®; Flovent®; Flutiform®; Incruse Ellipta®; Serevent®;
Symbicort®; Tudorza Pressair® and Ventolin®.
MANUFACTURING
We do not have manufacturing facilities and rely on, and expect to continue to rely on, third-party contract
manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) for the supply of current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”) compliant
clinical trial materials of ensifentrine, and any future product candidates, as well as for commercial quantities of
ensifentrine and any future product candidates, if approved. We currently do not have any agreements for the long-
term commercial production of ensifentrine.
While we may contract with other CMOs in the future, we currently have one CMO for the manufacture of
ensifentrine drug substance and one CMO for each formulation of ensifentrine.
All of our current CMOs have commercial scale manufacturing capabilities. We believe that the ensifentrine drug
substance and drug product manufacturing processes can be transferred to other CMOs to produce clinical and
commercial supplies in the ordinary course of business.
COMMERCIALIZATION
United States
In the United States, we are preparing to commercialize nebulized ensifentrine ourselves, if approved. Current
maintenance COPD treatments in the U.S. generate approximately $10.5 billion in sales. Despite the availability of
these therapies, it is estimated that more than 1 million patients remain symptomatic following treatment with
maximum therapy. These patients need therapies that can help improve their lung function and symptoms. In
addition to the number of patients that remain symptomatic, COPD places a tremendous burden on the U.S.
healthcare system with approximately $50 billion in direct and indirect costs.
Based on our market research, conducted with U.S. healthcare providers and payers, we believe ensifentrine would
be widely adopted and that the majority of ensifentrine’s use would be primarily as an add-on to dual or triple
therapy regimens. This is due to the urgent unmet need for new therapies to help improve lung function, symptoms
and quality of life. Our market research also suggests the majority of ensifentrine usage would be initially
commenced by pulmonologists. Due to this focused prescriber base, we anticipate a field sales force of
approximately 100 representatives would be able to reach the potential ensifentrine opportunity.
International
COPD affects over 384 million people worldwide with many patients remaining undiagnosed. Our strategy outside
of the U.S. including Asia, Europe and Latin America, is to establish partnerships with leading companies that can
support the further development and commercialization of ensifentrine in those regions.
7
In June 2021, we executed on this strategy by entering into a strategic collaboration with Nuance Pharma, a
Shanghai-based specialty pharmaceutical company, with a potential value of up to $219.0 million to develop and
commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China. Under the terms of the agreement, we granted Nuance Pharma the
exclusive rights to develop and commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China. In return, we received an aggregate
$40.0 million upfront payment consisting of $25.0 million in cash and an equity interest valued at $15.0 million, as
of June 9, 2021, in Nuance Biotech, the parent company of Nuance Pharma. We are eligible to receive further
milestone payments of up to $179.0 million that are triggered upon achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and
commercial milestones as well as tiered double-digit royalties on net sales in Greater China.
Nuance Pharma is responsible for all costs related to clinical development and commercialization in Greater China.
A joint steering committee has been established to ensure ensifentrine’s clinical development in the region aligns
with our global development and commercialization strategy. Nuance Pharma plans to file an Investigational New
Drug Application with the China Food and Drug Administration and afterwards to begin clinical studies for the
treatment of COPD in Greater China.
COMPETITION
The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong
emphasis on proprietary drugs. We face potential competition from many different sources, including major
pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, governmental
agencies and public and private research institutions. If successfully developed and commercialized, ensifentrine
will compete with existing treatments and new treatments that may become available in the future.
Ensifentrine is a unique, first-in-class therapeutic candidate with both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory
properties in a single compound. As far as we are aware, no other dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor is on the market
nor in clinical development. Based on our market research, we expect ensifentrine to be used mainly in addition to
existing dual and triple therapies, LAMA / LABA / ICS, where no additional treatment options exist for patients
who are symptomatic. Some healthcare providers have indicated that they would use it as earlier line therapy based
on ensifentrine’s clinical profile.
Consequently, we believe that, if approved, nebulized ensifentrine’s unique profile will enable it to compete with all
approved COPD therapies including nebulized and handheld inhaler formulations, DPI and pMDI. Furthermore,
because ensifentrine’s mechanism of action is complementary to available therapies, we believe it could be used in
addition to these treatments.
Within the currently approved nebulizer products for the maintenance treatment of COPD, we consider ensifentrine's
potential competitors in the U.S. market to be LABAs (Brovana® and Perforomist®) and LAMAs (Yupelri® and
Lonhala®Magnair®).
In the DPI/pMDI maintenance treatment of COPD market, ensifentrine’s current closest potential competitors are
Symbicort®, a combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator and ICS marketed by AstraZeneca plc,
Spiriva®, a long-acting anti-muscarinic bronchodilator marketed by Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Advair®, a
combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator and ICS marketed by GlaxoSmithKline plc, Utibron
Neohaler®, a combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist and long-acting anti-muscarinic bronchodilator marketed
by Novartis International AG, Breo®, a combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator and ICS marketed
by GlaxoSmithKline, and Anoro®, a combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist bronchodilator and long-acting anti-
muscarinic bronchodilator marketed by GlaxoSmithKline. A triple-combination therapy of a LAMA, a LABA and
ICS, developed by GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Trelegy Ellipta®, has been approved in the
U.S. and the European Union and AstraZeneca also has a triple-therapy combination product (LAMA / LABA /
ICS), Breztri Aerosphere® that was approved in the U.S. in July 2020, in the European Union in December 2020 and
in China in December 2019.
Other potential therapies in clinical development for the prevention of COPD exacerbations include injectable
biologics. Sanofi’s anti-IL4, Dupixent®, AstraZeneca’s anti-IL5, Fasenra®, GlaxoSmithKline’s anti-IL5, Nucala®,
and Chiesi’s PDE4 inhibitor, Tanimilast, are in Phase 3 trials. We are also aware of several anti-inflammatories and
bronchodilators that are in Phase 2 clinical trials for the treatment of COPD.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies, inventions and improvements that we believe are
important to our business, including seeking, maintaining and defending patent rights, whether developed internally
8
or licensed from third parties. Our policy is to seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods,
pursuing and obtaining patent protection in the U.S. and in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. related to our proprietary
technology, inventions, improvements, platforms and our product candidates that are important to the development
and implementation of our business.
As of December 31, 2021, our patent portfolio consisted of nine issued U.S. patents, three pending U.S. patent
applications, sixty issued foreign patents and forty-eight pending foreign applications including two patent
applications made under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. These patents and patent applications include claims
directed to certain respirable formulations comprising ensifentrine, a crystalline form of ensifentrine, combinations
of ensifentrine with certain respiratory drugs, certain salts of ensifentrine, ensifentrine for use in the treatment of
cystic fibrosis, and a method of making ensifentrine, with expected expiry dates up to 2041.
Individual patents extend for varying periods depending on the date of filing of the patent application or the date of
patent issuance and the legal term of patents in the countries in which they are obtained. Generally, patents issued
for regularly filed applications in the United States are granted a term of 20 years from the earliest effective
non‑provisional filing date. In addition, in certain instances, a patent term can be extended to recapture a portion of
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or the USPTO, delay in issuing the patent as well as a portion of the term
effectively lost as a result of the FDA regulatory review period. However, as to the FDA component, the restoration
period cannot be longer than five years and the total patent term including the restoration period must not exceed 14
years following FDA approval. The duration of foreign patents varies in accordance with provisions of applicable
local law, but typically is also 20 years from the earliest effective filing date. However, the actual protection
afforded by a patent varies on a product-by-product basis, from country to country and depends upon many factors,
including the type of patent, the scope of its coverage, the availability of regulatory‑related extensions, the
availability of legal remedies in a particular country and the validity and enforceability of the patent.
Furthermore, we rely upon trade secrets and know‑how and continuing technological innovation to develop and
maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, using confidentiality
agreements with our collaborators, employees and consultants and invention assignment agreements with our
employees. We also have confidentiality agreements or invention assignment agreements with our collaborators and
selected consultants. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of the
invention assignment agreements, to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed through a relationship
with a third party. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In
addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the
extent that our collaborators, employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others in their work for
us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know‑how and inventions.
Our commercial success will also depend in part on not infringing upon the proprietary rights of third parties. It is
uncertain whether the issuance of any third‑party patent would require us to alter our development or commercial
strategies, or our drugs or processes, obtain licenses or cease certain activities. Our breach of any license agreements
or failure to obtain a license to proprietary rights that we may require to develop or commercialize our future drugs
may have an adverse impact on us. If third parties have prepared and filed patent applications prior to March 16,
2013 in the United States that also claim technology to which we have rights, we may have to participate in
interference proceedings in the USPTO, to determine priority of invention. For more information, please see “Item
1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to Intellectual Property and Information Technology.”
License agreement with Ligand (formerly Vernalis)
In February 2005, Rhinopharma Limited (“Rhinopharma”) entered into an assignment and license agreement with
Ligand UK Development Limited (formerly Vernalis Development Limited) (“Ligand”), which since October 2018
has been a wholly owned subsidiary of Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We refer to the assignment and license
agreement as the Ligand Agreement. In 2006, we acquired Rhinopharma and all its rights and liabilities under the
Ligand Agreement. Pursuant to the Ligand Agreement, Ligand has assigned to us all its rights to certain patents and
patent applications relating to ensifentrine and related compounds, or the Ligand Patents. We cannot further assign
the Ligand Patents to a third party without Ligand's prior consent. Ligand also granted to us an exclusive,
worldwide, royalty-bearing license under certain Ligand know-how to develop, manufacture and commercialize
products, or the Licensed Products, based on PDE inhibitors developed using Ligand Patents, Ligand know-how and
the physical stock of certain compounds, including ensifentrine, which we refer to as the Program IP, in the
treatment of human or animal allergic or inflammatory disorders. Pursuant to the Ligand Agreement, we must
maintain the Ligand Patents and use commercially reasonable and diligent efforts to develop and commercialize the
Licensed Products.
9
Under the Ligand Agreement, we are obligated to pay Ligand a milestone payment of £5.0 million upon the first
approval of any regulatory authority for the commercialization of any Licensed Product, and a portion equal to a
percentage in the mid-twenties of any consideration received from any of our sublicensees for Ligand Patents or
Ligand know-how, excluding royalties. We must also pay Ligand, on a Licensed Product-by-Licensed Product and
country-by-country basis, a low single digit percentage royalty based on net sales of each Licensed Product for a
period beginning with the first commercial sale of such Licensed Product in a country and ending on the later of the
expiration of a certain number of years after such first commercial sale and if applicable the expiration of the last to
expire valid claim in the Ligand Patents covering the development, manufacture or commercialization of such
Licensed Product in such country. Prior to the first commercial sale of each Licensed Product, such royalties also are
due in the same percentages for any named patient sales.
The Ligand Agreement continues until terminated by either party in accordance with its terms. Either party may
terminate the Ligand Agreement for an uncured material breach, bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party. We
may terminate the Ligand Agreement upon 90 days' prior written notice. Ligand may terminate the Ligand
Agreement if we notify Ligand of our intention to abandon any Ligand Patents or allow any Ligand Patents to lapse.
Upon termination of the Ligand Agreement, we must cease use of any Program IP and assign the Ligand Patents and
any improvements thereto back to Ligand.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The FDA and comparable regulatory authorities in state and local jurisdictions and in other countries impose
substantial and burdensome requirements upon companies involved in the clinical development, manufacture,
marketing and distribution of drugs such as those we are developing. These agencies and other federal, state and
local entities regulate, among other things, the research and development, testing, manufacture, quality control,
safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion, distribution, post-
approval monitoring and reporting, sampling and export and import of our product candidates.
FDA drug approval process
In the U.S., the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and its
implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with
applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and
financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product
development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety of administrative or
judicial sanctions, such as the FDA's refusal to file an application for assessment or non approval of a pending new
drug applications (“NDA”), withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning letters,
product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals
of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.
The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally involves the
following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Completion of non-clinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies in compliance with the
FDA's good laboratory practice (“GLP”) regulations;
Submission to the FDA of an investigational new drug application (“IND”), which must become effective
before human clinical trials may begin;
Approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) or ethics committee at each clinical site before
each trial may be initiated;
Performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with good clinical practice
(“GCP”) requirements to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product for each indication;
Submission to the FDA of an NDA after completion of all pivotal trials;
Completion of an FDA advisory committee review, if required by the FDA;
Satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the product is
produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) requirements and to assure
that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug's identity, strength, quality and purity,
and of selected clinical investigation sites to assess compliance with GCP; and
10
•
FDA review and approval of the NDA and U.S. Prescribing Information to permit commercial marketing of the
product for particular indications for use in the U.S..
Non-clinical Studies
Non-clinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal
studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the non-clinical tests,
together with manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature, among other
things, to the FDA as part of an IND. An IND is a request for authorization from the FDA to ship in interstate
commerce and administer an investigational new drug product to humans. An IND automatically becomes effective
30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or
more proposed clinical trials and places the clinical trial on a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the
FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND
may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of
qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirement that all research
subjects or a legal representative provide their informed consent in writing for their participation in any clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives or endpoints of the trial,
the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each
clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition,
an IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial
before it commences at that institution. Regulatory authorities, the IRB or the sponsor may suspend a clinical trial at
any time on various grounds, including a finding that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk
or that the trial is unlikely to meet its stated objectives. Some studies also include oversight by an independent group
of qualified experts organized by the clinical study sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board, which reviews
the data and recommends whether or not a study may move forward at designated checkpoints. It may halt the
clinical trial if it determines that there is an unacceptable safety risk or on other grounds, such as no demonstration
of efficacy. Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National
Institutes of Health, or NIH, for public dissemination on their www.clinicaltrials.gov website.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three phases, which may overlap or be combined:
•
•
•
Phase 1: The drug candidate is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target
disease or condition and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and,
if possible, to gain an early indication of its effectiveness.
Phase 2: The drug candidate is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects
and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to
determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
Phase 3: The drug candidate is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically
dispersed clinical trial sites, in well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate the
efficacy and safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product, and to
provide adequate information for the labeling of the product.
Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 studies, may be conducted after initial marketing approval.
These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic
indication. In certain instances, the FDA may mandate the performance of Phase 4 clinical trials as a condition of
approval of an NDA.
During the development of a new drug, sponsors are given opportunities to meet with the FDA at certain points.
These points may be prior to submission of an IND, at the end of Phase 2, and before an NDA is submitted.
Meetings at other times may be requested. These meetings can provide an opportunity for the sponsor to share
information about the data gathered to date, for the FDA to provide advice, and for the sponsor and the FDA to
reach agreement on the next phase of development. Sponsors typically use the meetings at the end of the Phase 2
trial to discuss Phase 2 clinical results and present plans for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials that they believe will
support approval of the new drug.
Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop
additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for
manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing
11
process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things,
the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final drug. In
addition, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate
that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.
While the IND is active, progress reports summarizing the results of the clinical trials and nonclinical studies
performed since the last progress report, among other information, must be submitted at least annually to the FDA,
and written IND safety reports must be submitted to the FDA and investigators for serious and unexpected suspected
adverse events, findings from other studies suggesting a significant risk to humans exposed to the same or similar
drugs, findings from animal or in vitro testing suggesting a significant risk to humans, and any clinically important
increased incidence of a serious suspected adverse reaction compared to that listed in the protocol or investigator
brochure.
Marketing Approval
Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the pre-clinical studies and clinical
trials, together with detailed information relating to the product's chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed
labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product
for one or more indications. In most cases, the submission of an NDA is subject to a substantial application user fee.
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission, before accepting
them for filing, to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may
request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be
resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA
accepts it for filing.
Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The FDA reviews an
NDA to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is
manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product's continued safety,
quality and purity. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act guidelines that are currently in effect, the FDA has a
goal of ten months from the date of “filing”of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the
submission. This review typically takes twelve months from the date the NDA is submitted to FDA because the
FDA has approximately two months to make a “filing” decision after it the application is submitted.
The FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is a panel of
independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a
recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not
bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when
making decisions.
Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is
manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and
facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product
within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA may inspect one or more clinical
trial sites to assure compliance with GCP requirements.
After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any,
and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval
letter, or, in some cases, a complete response letter. A complete response letter generally contains a statement of
specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical
or pre-clinical testing in order for FDA to reconsider the application. Even with submission of this additional
information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA's satisfaction, the FDA will typically issue an approval
letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for
specific indications.
If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such approval will be granted for particular indications and may entail
limitations on the indicated uses for which such product may be marketed. For example, the FDA may approve the
NDA with a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) to ensure the benefits of the product outweigh its
risks. A REMS is a safety strategy to manage a known or potential serious risk associated with a medicine and to
enable patients to have continued access to such medicines by managing their safe use, and could include medication
guides, physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods,
patient registries, and other risk minimization tools. The FDA also may condition approval on, among other things,
12
changes to proposed labeling or the development of adequate controls and specifications. The FDA may also require
one or more Phase 4 post-market studies and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and
effectiveness after commercialization, and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these
post-marketing studies.
In addition, the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”) requires a sponsor to conduct pediatric clinical trials for
most drugs, for a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen or new route of
administration. Under PREA, original NDAs and supplements must contain a pediatric assessment unless the
sponsor has received a deferral or waiver from the FDA.
The FDA offers a number of expedited development and review programs for qualifying product candidates. For
example, the fast track program is intended to expedite or facilitate the process for reviewing new products that are
intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrate the potential to address unmet
medical needs for the disease or condition. Fast track designation applies to the combination of the product
candidate and the specific indication for which it is being studied. The sponsor of a fast track product candidate has
opportunities for more frequent interactions with the applicable FDA review team during product development and,
once an NDA is submitted, the product candidate may be eligible for priority review. A fast track product candidate
may also be eligible for rolling review, where the FDA may consider for review sections of the NDA on a rolling
basis before the complete application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the
sections of the NDA, the FDA agrees to accept sections of the NDA and determines that the schedule is acceptable,
and the sponsor pays any required user fees upon submission of the first section of the NDA.
A product candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition may also be eligible for
breakthrough therapy designation to expedite its development and review. A product candidate can receive
breakthrough therapy designation if preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product candidate, alone or in
combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing
therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in
clinical development. The designation includes all of the fast track program features, as well as more intensive FDA
interaction and guidance beginning as early as Phase 1 and an organizational commitment to expedite the
development and review of the product candidate, including involvement of senior managers.
Any marketing application for a drug submitted to the FDA for approval, including a product candidate with a fast
track designation and/or breakthrough therapy designation, may be eligible for other types of FDA programs to
expedite the FDA review and approval process, such as priority review and accelerated approval. An NDA is
eligible for priority review if the product candidate is designed to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or
condition, and if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness compared to
available alternatives for such disease or condition. For new molecular entity NDAs, priority review designation
means the FDA’s goal is to take action on the marketing application within six months of the 60-day filing date (as
compared to ten months under standard review).
Additionally, product candidates studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening
diseases or conditions may receive accelerated approval upon a determination that the product has an effect on a
surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured
earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on irreversible morbidity
or mortality or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the
availability or lack of alternative treatments. As a condition of accelerated approval, the FDA will generally require
the sponsor to perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical studies to verify and describe the
anticipated effect on irreversible morbidity or mortality or other clinical benefit. Products receiving accelerated
approval may be subject to expedited withdrawal procedures if the sponsor fails to conduct the required post-
marketing studies or if such studies fail to verify the predicted clinical benefit. In addition, the FDA currently
requires as a condition for accelerated approval pre-approval of promotional materials, which could adversely
impact the timing of the commercial launch of the product.
Fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review, and accelerated approval do not change
the standards for approval but may expedite the development or approval process. Even if a product candidate
qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the
conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.
Orphan drug designation and exclusivity
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug intended to treat a rare disease or
condition, defined as a disease or condition with a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United
13
States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 individuals in the United States and when there is no reasonable
expectation that the cost of developing and making available the drug or biologic in the United States will be
recovered from sales in the United States for that drug or biologic. Orphan drug designation must be requested
before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the therapeutic
agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA.
If a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for a particular active
ingredient for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity,
which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA, to market the same drug
for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to
the product with orphan drug exclusivity or if the FDA finds that the holder of the orphan drug exclusivity has not
shown that it can assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the orphan drug to meet the needs of patients with
the disease or condition for which the drug was designated. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from
approving a different drug for the same disease or condition, or the same drug for a different disease or condition.
Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the NDA
application user fee.
A designated orphan drug many not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than
the indication for which it received orphan designation. In addition, orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the
United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or, as
noted above, if a second applicant demonstrates that its product is clinically superior to the approved product with
orphan exclusivity or the manufacturer of the approved product is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the
product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.
Post-Approval Requirements
Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by
the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product
sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product. After
approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims are subject
to prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing, annual user fee requirements for any marketed
products under which NDA applicants must pay a substantial “program fee” for each prescription drug product
approved in an NDA.
In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs
are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic
unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes to
the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented.
FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP requirements and impose
reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may
decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production
and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and
standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously
unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with
manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in mandatory revisions to
the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess
new safety risks; or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential
consequences include, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
Restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the
market or product recalls;
Fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;
Refusal of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs, or suspension or revocation
of product approvals;
Product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
Injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
14
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market.
Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved
label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label
uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
Failure to comply with these requirements can result in, among other things, adverse publicity, warning letters,
corrective advertising and potential civil and criminal penalties.
Drug Product Marketing Exclusivity
Market exclusivity provisions authorized under the FDCA can delay the submission or the approval of certain
marketing applications. For example, the FDCA provides a five-year period of non-patent data exclusivity within the
United States to the first applicant to obtain approval of an NDA for a new chemical entity. A drug is a new
chemical entity if the FDA has not previously approved any other new drug containing the same active moiety,
which is the molecule or ion responsible for the action of the drug substance. During the exclusivity period, the FDA
may not approve or even accept for review an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) or an NDA submitted
under Section 505(b)(2) (a “505(b)(2) NDA”), submitted by another company for another drug based on the same
active moiety, regardless of whether the drug is intended for the same indication as the original innovative drug or
for another indication, where the applicant does not own or have a legal right of reference to all the data required for
approval. However, an application may be submitted after four years if it contains a certification of patent invalidity
or non-infringement to one of the patents listed with the FDA by the innovator NDA holder.
The FDCA alternatively provides three years of marketing exclusivity for an NDA, or supplement to an existing
NDA if new clinical investigations, other than bioavailability studies, that were conducted or sponsored by the
applicant are deemed by the FDA to be essential to the approval of the application, for example new indications,
dosages or strengths of an existing drug. This three-year exclusivity covers only the modification for which the drug
received approval on the basis of the new clinical investigations and does not prohibit the FDA from approving
ANDAs or 505(b)(2) NDAs for drugs containing the active agent for the original indication or condition of use.
Five-year and three-year exclusivity will not delay the submission or approval of a full NDA. However, an applicant
submitting a full NDA would be required to conduct or obtain a right of reference to any preclinical studies and
adequate and well-controlled clinical trials necessary to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
Foreign regulation
In order to market any medicinal product outside of the U.S., similar regulatory requirements, including adherence
to GLP, Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) and Good Manufacturing Practice (“GMP”), to initiate clinical trials and,
subsequently, to obtain marketing approval of a new pharmaceutical product are in place in each jurisdiction and
vary country to country.
Each jurisdiction will apply these regulations in their assessment of clinical trial applications and marketing
authorization applications. The time required to obtain approval in other countries and jurisdictions might differ
from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country or jurisdiction
does not ensure regulatory approval in another. In addition, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one
country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others. Failure to comply with applicable
foreign regulatory requirements, may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension or withdrawal of
regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.
Non-clinical studies and clinical trials
Similarly to the United States, the various phases of non-clinical and clinical research in the European Union (“EU”)
are subject to significant regulatory controls.
Non-clinical studies are performed to demonstrate the health or environmental safety of new biological substances.
Non-clinical studies must be conducted in compliance with the principles of GLP, as set forth in EU Directive
2004/10/EC. In particular, non-clinical studies, both in vitro and in vivo, must be planned, performed, monitored,
recorded, reported and archived in accordance with the GLP principles, which define a set of rules and criteria for a
quality system for the organizational process and the conditions for non-clinical studies. These GLP standards reflect
the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development requirements.
Clinical trials of medicinal products in the EU must be conducted in accordance with EU and national regulations
and the International Conference on Harmonization (“ICH”) guidelines on GCP as well as the applicable regulatory
requirements and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. If the sponsor of the
clinical trial is not established within the EU, it must appoint an EU entity to act as its legal representative. The
15
sponsor must take out a clinical trial insurance policy, and in most EU countries, the sponsor is liable to provide ‘no
fault’ compensation to any study subject injured in the clinical trial.
The regulatory landscape related to clinical trials in the EU has been subject to recent changes. The EU Clinical
Trials Regulation (“CTR”) which was adopted in April 2014 and repeals the EU Clinical Trials Directive, became
applicable on January 31, 2022. Unlike directives, the CTR is directly applicable in all EU member states without
the need for member states to further implement it into national law. The CTR notably harmonizes the assessment
and supervision processes for clinical trials throughout the EU via a Clinical Trials Information System, which
contains a centralized EU portal and database.
While the Clinical Trials Directive required a separate clinical trial application (“CTA”) to be submitted in each
member state, to both the competent national health authority and an independent ethics committee, much like the
FDA and IRB respectively, the CTR introduces a centralized process and only requires the submission of a single
application to all member states concerned. The CTR allows sponsors to make a single submission to both the
competent authority and an ethics committee in each member state, leading to a single decision per member state.
The CTA must include, among other things, a copy of the trial protocol and an investigational medicinal product
dossier containing information about the manufacture and quality of the medicinal product under investigation. The
assessment procedure of the CTA has been harmonized as well, including a joint assessment by all member states
concerned, and a separate assessment by each member state with respect to specific requirements related to its own
territory, including ethics rules. Each member state’s decision is communicated to the sponsor via the centralized EU
portal. Once the CTA is approved, clinical study development may proceed.
The CTR foresees a three-year transition period. The extent to which ongoing and new clinical trials will be
governed by the CTR varies. For clinical trials whose CTA was made under the Clinical Trials Directive before
January 31, 2022, the Clinical Trials Directive will continue to apply on a transitional basis for three years.
Additionally, sponsors may still choose to submit a CTA under either the Clinical Trials Directive or the CTR until
January 31, 2023 and, if authorized, those will be governed by the Clinical Trials Directive until January 31, 2025.
By that date, all ongoing trials will become subject to the provisions of the CTR.
Medicines used in clinical trials must be manufactured in accordance with GMP. Other national and EU-wide
regulatory requirements may also apply.
Marketing authorization
In the EEA, medicinal products can only be placed on the market after obtaining a marketing authorization (“MA”).
To obtain regulatory approval of a product candidate under EU regulatory systems, we must submit a marketing
authorization application, or MAA. The process for doing this depends, among other things, on the nature of the
medicinal product. There are two types of MAs:
•
•
“Centralized MAs” are issued by the European Commission through the centralized procedure, based on the
opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) of the European Medicines
Agency (“EMA”), and are valid throughout the entire territory of the EEA. The centralized procedure is
mandatory for certain types of medicinal products, such as (i) medicines derived from biotechnology processes,
(ii) advanced therapy medicinal products (such as gene therapy, somatic cell therapy and tissue engineered
products), (iii) orphan designated medicinal products, and (iv) products that contain a new active substance
indicated for the treatment of certain diseases such as HIV/AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes,
auto-immune and viral diseases. The centralized procedure is optional for products containing a new active
substance not yet authorized in the EEA, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific or
technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the EU.
“National MAs” are issued by the competent authorities of the member states of the EEA and only cover their
respective territory, and are available for products not falling within the mandatory scope of the centralized
procedure. Where a product has already been authorized for marketing in a member state of the EEA, this
national MA can be recognized in another member state through the mutual recognition procedure. If the
product has not received a national MA in any member state at the time of application, it can be approved
simultaneously in various member states through the decentralized procedure. Under the decentralized
procedure an identical dossier is submitted to the competent authorities of each of the member states in which
the MA is sought, one of which is selected by the applicant as the reference member state.
Under the above described procedures, in order to grant the MA, the EMA or the competent authorities of the
member states of the EEA make an assessment of the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific
criteria concerning its quality, safety and efficacy. MAs have an initial duration of five years. After these five years,
the authorization may be renewed on the basis of a reevaluation of the risk-benefit balance.
16
Under the centralized procedure the maximum timeframe for the evaluation of a MAA by the EMA is 210 days. In
exceptional cases, the CHMP might perform an accelerated assessment of a MAA in no more than 150 days (not
including clock stops). Innovative products that target an unmet medical need and are expected to be of major public
health interest may be eligible for a number of expedited development and review programs, such as the Priority
Medicines (“PRIME”) scheme, which provides incentives similar to the breakthrough therapy designation in the
U.S. In March 2016, the EMA launched an initiative, the PRIME scheme, a voluntary scheme aimed at enhancing
the EMA’s support for the development of medicines that target unmet medical needs. It is based on increased
interaction and early dialogue with companies developing promising medicines, to optimize their product
development plans and speed up their evaluation to help them reach patients earlier. Product developers that benefit
from PRIME designation can expect to be eligible for accelerated assessment but this is not guaranteed. Many
benefits accrue to sponsors of product candidates with PRIME designation, including but not limited to, early and
proactive regulatory dialogue with the EMA, frequent discussions on clinical trial designs and other development
program elements, and accelerated MAA assessment once a dossier has been submitted. Importantly, a dedicated
contact and rapporteur from the CHMP is appointed early in the PRIME scheme facilitating increased understanding
of the product at EMA’s committee level. An initial meeting initiates these relationships and includes a team of
multidisciplinary experts at the EMA to provide guidance on the overall development and regulatory strategies.
Data and marketing exclusivity
In the EEA, new products authorized for marketing, or reference products, generally receive eight years of data
exclusivity and an additional two years of market exclusivity upon MA. If granted, the data exclusivity period
prevents generic or biosimilar applicants from relying on the pre-clinical and clinical trial data contained in the
dossier of the reference product when applying for a generic or biosimilar MA in the EU during a period of eight
years from the date on which the reference product was first authorized in the EU. The market exclusivity period
prevents a successful generic or biosimilar applicant from commercializing its product in the EU until 10 years have
elapsed from the initial authorization of the reference product in the EU. The overall 10-year market exclusivity
period can be extended to a maximum of eleven years if, during the first eight years of those 10 years, the MA
holder obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which, during the scientific evaluation
prior to their authorization, are held to bring a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies.
However, there is no guarantee that a product will be considered by the EU’s regulatory authorities to be a new
active substance, and products may not qualify for data exclusivity.
Pediatric development
In the EEA, MAAs for new medicinal products have to include the results of studies conducted in the pediatric
population, in compliance with a pediatric investigation plan (“PIP”), agreed with the EMA's Pediatric Committee
(“PDCO”). The PIP sets out the timing and measures proposed to generate data to support a pediatric indication of
the drug for which MA is being sought. The PDCO can grant a deferral of the obligation to implement some or all of
the measures of the PIP until there are sufficient data to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the product in adults.
Further, the obligation to provide pediatric clinical trial data can be waived by the PDCO when these data is not
needed or appropriate because the product is likely to be ineffective or unsafe in children, the disease or condition
for which the product is intended occurs only in adult populations, or when the product does not represent a
significant therapeutic benefit over existing treatments for pediatric patients. We have received a waiver for pediatric
data in COPD.
Orphan Medicinal Products
The criteria for designating an “orphan medicinal product” in the EU are similar in principle to those in the United
States. A medicinal product may be designated as orphan if (1) it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or
treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition; (2) either (a) such condition affects no more than
five in 10,000 persons in the EU when the application is made, or (b) the product, without the benefits derived from
orphan status, would not generate sufficient return in the EU to justify investment; and (3) there exists no
satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the EU, or if
such a method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
Orphan medicinal products are eligible for financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers and are, upon
grant of a marketing authorization, entitled to ten years of market exclusivity for the approved therapeutic indication
which means that the EU regulatory authorities cannot accept another MAA, or grant an MA, or accept an
application to extend a MA for a similar product for the same indication for a period of ten years. The period of
market exclusivity is extended by two years for orphan medicinal products that have also complied with an agreed
PIP. No extension to any supplementary protection certificate can be granted on the basis of pediatric studies for
orphan indications.The application for orphan drug designation must be submitted before the application for MA.
17
Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and
approval process.
The 10-year market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the
product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation, for example, if the product is sufficiently profitable not
to justify maintenance of market exclusivity, or where the prevalence of the condition has increased above the
threshold. Additionally, MA may be granted to a similar product for the same indication at any time if (1) the second
applicant can establish that its product, although similar, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; (2)
the applicant consents to a second orphan medicinal product application; or (3) the applicant cannot supply enough
orphan medicinal product.
Post-Approval Requirements
Similar to the United States, both MA holders and manufacturers of medicinal products are subject to
comprehensive regulatory oversight by the EMA, the European Commission and/or the competent regulatory
authorities of the EU member states. The holder of a MA must establish and maintain a pharmacovigilance system
and appoint an individual qualified person for pharmacovigilance who is responsible for oversight of that system.
Key obligations include expedited reporting of suspected serious adverse reactions and submission of periodic safety
update reports (“PSURs”).
All new MAA must include a risk management plan (“RMP”) describing the risk management system that the
company will put in place and documenting measures to prevent or minimize the risks associated with the product.
The regulatory authorities may also impose specific obligations as a condition of the MA. Such risk-minimization
measures or post-authorization obligations may include additional safety monitoring, more frequent submission of
PSURs, or the conduct of additional clinical trials or post-authorization safety studies.
The advertising and promotion of medicinal products is also subject to laws concerning promotion of medicinal
products, interactions with physicians, misleading and comparative advertising and unfair commercial practices. All
advertising and promotional activities for the product must be consistent with the approved summary of product
characteristics, and therefore all off-label promotion is prohibited. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription
medicines is also prohibited in the EU. Although general requirements for advertising and promotion of medicinal
products are established under EU directives, the details are governed by regulations in each member state and can
differ from one country to another.
The aforementioned EU rules are generally applicable in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) which consists of
the 27 EU member states plus Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland.
Failure by us or by any of our third-party partners, including suppliers, manufacturers and distributors to comply
with EU and EU member state laws that apply to the conduct of clinical trials, manufacturing approval, MA of
medicinal products and marketing of such products, both before and after grant of the MA, manufacturing of
medicinal products, statutory health insurance, bribery and anti-corruption or with other applicable regulatory
requirements may result in administrative, civil or criminal penalties. These penalties could include delays or refusal
to authorize the conduct of clinical trials or to grant MA, product withdrawals and recalls, product seizures,
suspension, withdrawal or variation of the marketing authorization, total or partial suspension of production,
distribution, manufacturing or clinical trials, operating restrictions, injunctions, suspension of licenses, fines and
criminal penalties.
Brexit and the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom (“UK”) left the EU on January 31, 2020, following which existing EU medicinal product
legislation continued to apply in the UK during the transition period under the terms of the EU-UK Withdrawal
Agreement. The transition period, which ended on December 31, 2020, maintained access to the EU single market
and to the global trade deals negotiated by the EU on behalf of its members. The transition period provided time for
the UK and EU to negotiate a framework for partnership for the future, which was then crystallized in the Trade and
Cooperation Agreement (“TCA”) and became effective on the January 1, 2021. The TCA includes specific
provisions concerning pharmaceuticals, which include the mutual recognition of GMP inspections of manufacturing
facilities for medicinal products and GMP documents issued, but does not foresee wholesale mutual recognition of
UK and EU pharmaceutical regulations.
18
EU laws which have been transposed into UK law through secondary legislation continue to be applicable as
“retained EU law”. However, new legislation such as the EU CTR will not be applicable. The UK government has
passed a new Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021, which introduces delegated powers in favor of the
Secretary of State or an ‘appropriate authority’ to amend or supplement existing regulations in the area of medicinal
products and medical devices. This allows new rules to be introduced in the future by way of secondary legislation,
which aims to allow flexibility in addressing regulatory gaps and future changes in the fields of human medicines,
clinical trials and medical devices.
As of January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) is the UK’s
standalone medicines and medical devices regulator. As a result of the Northern Ireland protocol, different rules will
apply in Northern Ireland than in England, Wales, and Scotland, together, Great Britain (“GB”); broadly, Northern
Ireland will continue to follow the EU regulatory regime, but its national competent authority will remain the
MHRA. The MHRA has published a guidance on how various aspects of the UK regulatory regime for medicines
will operate in GB and in Northern Ireland following the expiry of the Brexit transition period on December 31,
2020. The guidance includes clinical trials, importing, exporting, and pharmacovigilance and is relevant to any
business involved in the research, development, or commercialization of medicines in the UK. The new guidance
was given effect via the Human Medicines Regulations (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (the “Exit
Regulations”).
The MHRA has introduced changes to national licensing procedures, including procedures to prioritize access to
new medicines that will benefit patients, including a 150-day assessment and a rolling review procedure. All existing
EU MAs for centrally authorized products were automatically converted or grandfathered into UK MAs, effective in
GB (only), free of charge on January 1, 2021, unless the MA holder chooses to opt-out. In order to use the
centralized procedure to obtain a MA that will be valid throughout the EEA, companies must be established in the
EEA. Therefore after Brexit, without first establishing an EAA entity, companies established in the UK can no
longer use the EU centralized procedure and instead an EEA entity must hold any centralized MAs . In order to
obtain a UK MA to commercialize products in the UK, an applicant must be established in the UK and must follow
one of the UK national authorization procedures or one of the remaining post-Brexit international cooperation
procedures to obtain an MA to commercialize products in the UK. The MHRA may rely on a decision taken by the
European Commission on the approval of a new (centralized procedure) MA when determining an application for a
GB authorization; or use the MHRA’s decentralized or mutual recognition procedures which enable MAs approved
in EU member states (or Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway) to be granted in GB.
There is no pre-MA orphan designation. Instead, the MHRA will review applications for orphan designation in
parallel to the corresponding MA application. The criteria are essentially the same, but have been tailored for the
market, i.e., the prevalence of the condition in GB, rather than the EU, must not be more than five in 10,000. Should
an orphan designation be granted, the period of market exclusivity will be set from the date of first approval of the
product in GB.
Other U.S. Healthcare Laws
In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical and biological products, other U.S. federal and state
healthcare regulatory laws restrict business practices in the pharmaceutical industry, which include, but are not
limited to, state and federal anti-kickback, false claims and physician payment and drug pricing transparency laws.
Similar laws exist in foreign jurisdictions.
The U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly and
willfully offering, paying, soliciting, receiving or providing any remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or
covertly, to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering, or arranging for or recommending the purchase,
lease, or order of any good, facility, item or service reimbursable, in whole or in part, under Medicare, Medicaid or
other federal healthcare programs. The term "remuneration" has been broadly interpreted to include anything of
value. The Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical
manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers, formulary managers and beneficiaries on the other.
Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities
from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices that involve remuneration that may
be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases, or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do
not meet the requirements of a statutory or regulatory exception or safe harbor. Failure to meet all of the
requirements of a particular applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per
se illegal under the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Instead, the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on
a case-by-case basis based on a cumulative review of all its facts and circumstances. Several courts have interpreted
19
the statute's intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to
induce referrals of federal healthcare covered business, the statute has been violated.
In addition, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in
order to have committed a violation. The majority of states also have anti-kickback laws, which establish similar
prohibitions and in some cases may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including
commercial insurers.
The federal false claims and civil monetary penalties laws, including the civil False Claims Act, prohibit any person
or entity from, among other things, knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false, fictitious or fraudulent
claim for payment to, or approval by, the federal government, knowingly making, using, or causing to be made or
used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government, or from knowingly
making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government. A
claim includes "any request or demand" for money or property presented to the U.S. government. Actions under the
civil False Claims Act may be brought by the Attorney General or as a qui tam action by a private individual in the
name of the government. Violations of the civil False Claims Act can result in very significant monetary penalties
and treble damages. Several pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws
for, among other things, allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would
bill federal programs for the product. Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be
submitted because of the companies' marketing of products for unapproved, or off-label, uses. Moreover, a claim
including items or services resulting from a violation of the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statue constitutes a false or
fraudulent claim for the purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. In addition, the civil monetary penalties
statute imposes penalties against any person who is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim
to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as
claimed or is false or fraudulent. Many states also have similar fraud and abuse statutes or regulations that apply to
items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the
payor.
Violations of fraud and abuse laws, including federal and state anti-kickback and false claims laws, may be
punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, the possibility of exclusion
from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid), disgorgement and corporate integrity
agreements, which impose, among other things, rigorous operational and monitoring requirements on companies.
Similar sanctions and penalties, as well as imprisonment, also can be imposed upon executive officers and
employees of such companies. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the
government authorities will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers' and
manufacturers' compliance with applicable fraud and abuse laws.
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created additional federal
criminal statutes that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a
scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, knowingly and willfully
embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a
healthcare offense and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any
materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare
benefits, items or services. Similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to
have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.
In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians
and certain other healthcare providers. The Physician Payments Sunshine Act imposes, among other things, annual
reporting requirements for covered manufacturers for certain payments and "transfers of value" provided to
physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-physician
practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists,
anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse-midwives) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment
interests held by physicians and their immediate family members. Failure to submit timely, accurately and
completely the required information for all payments, transfers of value and ownership or investment interests may
result in significant civil monetary penalties and additional penalties for "knowing failures." Covered manufacturers
must submit reports by the 90th day of each subsequent calendar year. In addition, certain states require
implementation of compliance programs and compliance with the pharmaceutical industry's voluntary compliance
guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, impose restrictions on
marketing practices and/or tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration or items of value
provided to physicians and other healthcare professionals and entities.
20
Coverage and Reimbursement
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any pharmaceutical or biological
products for which we obtain regulatory approval. In the United States and markets in other countries, patients who
are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely on
third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Patients are unlikely to use our products
unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost of our products.
Sales of any products for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale will therefore depend, in part,
on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors include
government authorities, managed care plans, private health insurers and other organizations.
In the United States, the process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a
pharmaceutical or biological product typically is separate from the process for setting the price of such product or
for establishing the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-
party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might
not include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication. A decision by a third-party payor not to
cover our product candidates could reduce physician utilization of our products once approved and have a material
adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, a third-party payor's decision to
provide coverage for a pharmaceutical or biological product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will
be approved. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels
sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Additionally, coverage and
reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. One third-party payor's decision to cover a
particular medical product or service does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the medical
product or service, or will provide coverage at an adequate reimbursement rate. As a result, the coverage
determination process will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each
payor separately and will be a time-consuming process.
In the EEA, governments influence the price of products through their pricing and reimbursement rules and control
of national health care systems that fund a large part of the cost of those products to consumers. Member states are
free to restrict the range of pharmaceutical products for which their national health insurance systems provide
reimbursement, and to control the prices and reimbursement levels of pharmaceutical products for human use. Some
jurisdictions operate positive and negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a
reimbursement price has been agreed to by the government. member states may approve a specific price or level of
reimbursement for the pharmaceutical product, or alternatively adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the
profitability of the company responsible for placing the pharmaceutical product on the market, including volume-
based arrangements, caps and reference pricing mechanisms.To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval, some of
these countries may require the completion of clinical trials that compare the cost effectiveness of a particular
product candidate to currently available therapies. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for
medicines, but monitor and control company profits. The downward pressure on health care costs in general,
particularly prescription products, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected
to the entry of new products. In addition, in some countries, cross border imports from low-priced markets exert a
commercial pressure on pricing within a country.
The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices
of pharmaceutical or biological products have been a focus in this effort. Third-party payors are increasingly
challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, examining the medical necessity and reviewing the
cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical or biological products, medical devices and medical services, in addition to
questioning safety and efficacy. If these third-party payors do not consider our products to be cost-effective
compared to other available therapies, they may not cover our products after FDA approval or, if they do, the level
of payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products at a profit.
Healthcare Reform
A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and other
third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for
particular medical products. For example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as
amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the ACA, was enacted, which,
among other things, increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid
Drug Rebate Program; introduced a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid
Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; extended the
Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care
21
plans; imposed mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries as a condition for manufacturers'
outpatient drugs coverage under Medicare Part D.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, executive and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA.
On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by
several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision,
President Biden issued an executive order initiating a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through
August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive
order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that
limit access to healthcare.
Additionally, on August 2, 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011 created measures for spending reductions was
enacted, which, among other things, included aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per
fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013 and, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute,
will stay in effect through 2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through March 31,
2022, unless additional action is taken by Congress. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012
was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers,
including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for
the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. More recently, there has been
heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed
products, which have resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted legislation
designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing
and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for
pharmaceutical products.
We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which
could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which
could result in reduced demand for our products, once approved, or additional price increases. In particular, we
anticipate that Medicare Part B will play an important role in the reimbursement of ensifentrine. Changes in how
products are reimbursed through Medicare Part B may affect the overall coverage for ensifentrine, if approved. Any
reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar reduction
in payments from private payors.
Data Privacy and Security Laws
Numerous state, federal and foreign laws, regulations and standards govern the collection, use, access to,
confidentiality and security of health-related and other personal information, and could apply now or in the future to
our operations or the operations of our partners. In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and
regulations, including data breach notification laws, health information privacy and security laws and consumer
protection laws and regulations govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other
personal information. In addition, certain foreign laws govern the privacy and security of personal data, including
health-related data. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) imposes strict requirements for
processing the personal data of individuals within the European Economic Area. Companies that must comply with
the GDPR face increased compliance obligations and risk, including more robust regulatory enforcement of data
protection requirements and potential fines for noncompliance of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global
revenues of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater. Further, from January 1, 2021, companies have had to
comply with the GDPR and also the United Kingdom GDPR (“UK GDPR”), which, together with the amended UK
Data Protection Act 2018, retains the GDPR in UK national law. The UK GDPR mirrors the fines under the GDPR,
i.e., fines up to the greater of €20 million (£17.5 million) or 4% of global turnover. Privacy and security laws,
regulations, and other obligations are constantly evolving, may conflict with each other to complicate compliance
efforts, and can result in investigations, proceedings, or actions that lead to significant civil and/or criminal penalties
and restrictions on data processing.
Additional regulation
In addition to the foregoing, state and federal laws regarding environmental protection and hazardous substances,
including the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Toxic
Substances Control Act, affect our business. These and other laws govern the use, handling and disposal of various
biologic, chemical and radioactive substances used in, and wastes generated by, operations. If our operations result
in contamination of the environment or expose individuals to hazardous substances, we could be liable for damages
22
and governmental fines. Equivalent laws have been adopted in certain other countries that impose similar
obligations.
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), prohibits U.S. corporations and individuals from engaging in
certain activities to obtain or retain business abroad or to influence a person working in an official capacity. It is
illegal to pay, offer to pay or authorize the payment of anything of value to any foreign government official,
government staff member, political party or political candidate in an attempt to obtain or retain business or to
otherwise influence a person working in an official capacity. The scope of the FCPA includes interactions with
certain healthcare professionals in many countries. Equivalent laws have been adopted in other foreign countries that
impose similar obligations.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2021, we had 24 full-time and 2 part time employees. None of our employees is party to a
collective bargaining agreement or represented by a trade union or labor union. We consider our relationship with
our employees to be good.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We were incorporated in February 2005 as Isis Resources plc under the laws of England and Wales. In September
2006, we acquired Rhinopharma Limited, a private company incorporated in Canada, and changed our name to
Verona Pharma plc. Our principal office is located at 3 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2RE, United
Kingdom.
We make available our public filings, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, with the SEC free of charge through our website
at www.veronapharma.com in the “Investors” section as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. The information contained in, or accessible through, our
website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Investing in our ADSs involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as
well as the other information in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related
notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”. The
occurrence of any of the events or developments described below could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In such an event, the market price of our ADSs could decline,
and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that
we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We have a limited operating history and have never generated any product revenue.
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history, and have incurred significant
operating losses since our inception. We had net losses of $55.6 million and $65.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $263.7
million. Our losses have resulted principally from expenses incurred in research and development of ensifentrine,
our only product candidate, and from general and administrative costs that we have incurred while building our
business infrastructure. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we
expand our research and development efforts, advance our clinical development of ensifentrine, and seek to obtain
regulatory approval for and commercialize ensifentrine. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially
as we:
•
•
conduct Phase 3 clinical trials of nebulized ensifentrine for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (“COPD”);
initiate and conduct clinical trials of ensifentrine for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (“CF”), asthma or other
indications;
23
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
initiate and conduct other future clinical trials in other formulations, for the treatment of COPD or other
indications;
initiate and conduct clinical pharmacology studies with any formulation;
seek to discover and develop or in-license additional respiratory product candidates;
conduct pre-clinical studies to support ensifentrine and potentially other future product candidates;
develop the manufacturing processes and produce clinical and commercial supplies of the ensifentrine active
pharmaceutical ingredient and formulated drug products derived from it;
seek regulatory approvals of ensifentrine;
establish commercial infrastructure to support the potential commercialization of ensifentrine, including sales,
marketing, operations, reimbursement and distribution infrastructure and scale-up manufacturing capabilities to
commercialize ensifentrine, if approved;
• maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;
•
•
•
secure, maintain or obtain freedom to operate for our in-licensed technologies and products;
add clinical, scientific, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including
personnel to support our product development and potential future commercialization efforts; and
expand our operations in the United States, the United Kingdom and possibly elsewhere.
Our expenses may also increase substantially if we experience any delays or encounter any issues with any of the
above, including, but not limited to, failed pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, complex results, safety issues or
regulatory challenges.
We have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to the research and development and pre-
clinical studies and clinical trials of ensifentrine. We are continuing development of ensifentrine, and we have not
completed development of any product candidate or any drugs.
To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing, and eventually commercializing, products that
generate significant revenue. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including
completing clinical trials of ensifentrine, discovering and developing additional product candidates, obtaining
regulatory approval for ensifentrine and any future product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials,
establishing manufacturing, commercial and marketing capabilities and ultimately distributing and selling any
products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. We are only in the preliminary stages of many of these
activities. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we do, we may never generate revenue that is
significant enough to achieve profitability.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical product development, we are unable
to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when, or if, we will be able to achieve
profitability. If we are required by the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), or other regulatory
authorities to perform studies in addition to those we currently anticipate, or if there are any delays in completing
our clinical trials or the development of ensifentrine or any other product candidates, our expenses could increase
and revenue could be further delayed.
Even if we do generate product royalties or product sales, we may never achieve or sustain profitability on a
quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to sustain profitability would depress the market price of our ADSs and could
impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, diversify our product offerings or continue our operations. A
decline in the market price of our ADSs also could cause our ADS holders to lose all or a part of their investment.
We will need additional funding to complete development of any future product candidates, or development of
other formulations or target indications of ensifentrine, and to commercialize our products, including
ensifentrine, if approved. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or
eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.
We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing and planned activities, particularly as we
conduct our ongoing clinical trials of ensifentrine, and develop ensifentrine for other indications. In addition, if we
obtain regulatory approval for ensifentrine or any other product candidates, we expect to incur significant
commercialization expenses related to activities including product positioning studies, product manufacturing,
medical affairs, marketing, sales and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to incur ongoing costs associated with
24
operating as a public company in the United States and maintaining a listing on the Nasdaq Global Market, or
Nasdaq. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing
operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce
or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
If we obtain regulatory approval for ensifentrine, we estimate that our existing cash resources and short-term
investments will not be sufficient to commercialize ensifentrine. We will require additional funds to conduct any
post-marketing studies to support the commercial positioning of ensifentrine for the treatment of COPD, if
regulatory approval is received. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we
could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, our operating plan may
change as a result of many factors unknown to us. These factors, among others, may necessitate that we seek
additional capital sooner than currently planned. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market
conditions or strategic considerations, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating
plans.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the costs, progress and results of our ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials for the maintenance treatment of COPD;
the costs, timing and outcome of the regulatory review of ensifentrine, including any post-marketing studies that
could be required by regulatory authorities, if regulatory approval is received;
the cost, progress and results of any other studies required to support the commercial positioning of ensifentrine
for the treatment of COPD, if regulatory approval is received;
the cost, progress and results of any clinical trials for the treatment of CF, asthma or other indications;
the cost of manufacturing clinical and, if approved, commercial supplies of the ensifentrine active ingredient
and derived formulated drug products;
the scope, progress, results and costs of pre-clinical development, laboratory testing and clinical trials for
ensifentrine in other indications and of the development of DPI and pMDI formulations of ensifentrine for the
maintenance treatment of COPD and potentially asthma and other respiratory diseases;
the costs, timing and outcome of potential future commercialization activities, including manufacturing,
marketing, sales and distribution, for ensifentrine;
the costs and timing of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our
intellectual property rights and defending any intellectual property-related claims, including any claims by third
parties that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights;
the timing and amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of ensifentrine;
the sales price and availability of adequate third-party coverage and reimbursement for ensifentrine;
the effect of competing technological and market developments; and
the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products and technologies, including entering into
licensing or collaboration arrangements for ensifentrine, although we currently have no commitments or
agreements to complete any such transactions.
Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may
adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize ensifentrine. In addition, we cannot guarantee that future
financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any
financing may adversely affect our business, the holdings or the rights of our shareholders, or the value of our
ordinary shares or ADSs.
If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue
our research and development programs relating to ensifentrine or any commercialization efforts, be unable to
expand our operations, or be unable to otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could
harm our business and potentially cause us to discontinue operations.
We depend solely on the success of ensifentrine, our only product candidate under development. We cannot give
any assurance that ensifentrine will receive regulatory approval for any indication, which is necessary before it
can be commercialized. If we, and any collaborators with whom we have entered or may enter into agreements
for the development and commercialization of ensifentrine, are unable to commercialize ensifentrine, or
25
experience significant delays in doing so, our ability to generate revenue and our financial condition will be
adversely affected.
We do not currently generate any revenues from sales of any products, and we may never be able to develop or
commercialize a marketable product. We have invested substantially all of our efforts and financial resources in the
development of ensifentrine, and we do not have any other product candidate currently under development. Our
ability to generate royalty and product revenues, which we do not expect will occur for at least the next several
years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of ensifentrine, if
approved, which may never occur. Ensifentrine will require additional clinical development, management of clinical,
pre-clinical and manufacturing activities, regulatory approval
jurisdictions, procurement of
manufacturing supply, commercialization, substantial additional investment and significant marketing efforts before
we generate any revenues from product sales. We are not permitted to market or promote ensifentrine or any product
candidates in the United States, Europe or other countries before we receive regulatory approval from the FDA, the
European Commission or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, and we may never receive such regulatory
approval for ensifentrine or any future product candidate. We have not submitted an NDA to the FDA, a marketing
authorization application (“MAA”) to the EMA or comparable applications to other regulatory authorities. The
success of ensifentrine will depend on many factors, including the following:
in multiple
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
we may not be able to demonstrate that ensifentrine is safe and effective as a treatment for our targeted
indications to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authorities;
the applicable regulatory authorities may require additional pre-clinical or clinical trials, which would increase
our costs and prolong our development;
the results of clinical trials of ensifentrine may not meet the level of statistical or clinical significance required
by the applicable regulatory authorities for marketing approval;
the applicable regulatory authorities may disagree with the number, design, size, conduct or implementation of
our planned clinical trials;
the contract research organizations (“CROs”) that we retain to conduct clinical trials may take actions outside of
our control that materially adversely impact our clinical trials;
the applicable regulatory authorities may not find the data from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials sufficient
to demonstrate that the clinical and other benefits of ensifentrine outweigh its safety risks or may disagree with
our interpretation of data;
our ability to demonstrate a non-clinical safety profile that is acceptable to the applicable regulatory authorities;
unexpected operational or clinical issues may prevent completion or interpretation of clinical study results;
unexpected manufacturing issues, product performance issues or stability issues may delay or otherwise
adversely affect the progress of our clinical development program;
the applicable regulatory authorities may not accept data generated at our clinical trial sites;
if we submit an NDA to the FDA, and it is reviewed by an advisory committee, the FDA may have difficulties
scheduling an advisory committee meeting in a timely manner or the advisory committee may recommend
against approval of our application or may recommend that the FDA require, as a condition of approval,
additional pre-clinical studies or clinical trials, limitations on approved labeling or distribution and use
restrictions;
the applicable regulatory authorities may require development of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or
REMS, or similar risk management measures as a condition of approval;
the applicable regulatory authorities may identify deficiencies in the manufacturing processes or facilities of our
third-party manufacturers;
the applicable regulatory authorities may change their approval policies or adopt new regulations;
if we license ensifentrine to others, the efforts of those parties in completing clinical trials of, receiving
regulatory approval for, and commercializing ensifentrine;
through our clinical trials, we may discover factors that limit the commercial viability of ensifentrine or make
the commercialization of ensifentrine unfeasible;
26
•
•
if we retain rights under a collaboration agreement for ensifentrine, our efforts in completing pre-clinical studies
and clinical trials of, receiving marketing approvals for, establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities for,
and commercializing ensifentrine; and
if approved, acceptance of ensifentrine by patients, the medical community and third-party payors, effectively
competing with other therapies, a continued acceptable safety profile following approval and qualifying for,
maintaining, enforcing and defending our intellectual property rights and claims.
An unfavorable outcome in any of these factors could result in our experiencing significant delays or an inability to
successfully commercialize ensifentrine.
We cannot be certain that ensifentrine or any future product candidates will be successful in clinical trials or receive
regulatory approval. Further, ensifentrine or any future product candidates may not receive regulatory approval even
if they are successful in clinical trials. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for ensifentrine or any future
product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations. Even if we successfully obtain regulatory
approvals to manufacture and market ensifentrine or any future product candidates, our revenues will be dependent,
in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval and have commercial
rights. If the markets for patient subsets that we are targeting are not as significant as we estimate, we may not
generate significant revenues from sales of such products, if approved.
We plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize ensifentrine both in the United States and the European Union
(“EU”), and potentially in additional foreign countries. While the scope of regulatory approval is similar in many
countries, to obtain separate regulatory approval in multiple countries requires us to comply with the numerous and
varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things,
clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of ensifentrine, and we cannot predict success in these
jurisdictions.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and may continue to adversely impact our business, including our preclinical
studies and clinical trials.
The COVID-19 pandemic has spread globally including in countries where we have operations or planned or
ongoing preclinical studies and clinical trials. Governments from many countries have established stay at home
measures including, among other things, the prohibition of public gatherings and restrictions on domestic and
international travel. The pandemic and government measures taken in response have also had a significant impact,
both direct and indirect, on businesses and commerce, as worker shortages continue to occur; supply chains are
being disrupted; facilities and production have been suspended; and demand for certain goods and services, such as
medical services and supplies, has spiked, while demand for other goods and services, such as travel, has fallen. In
response to the spread of COVID-19, we have closed our principal office in the U.K. and our office in the U.S. with
all employees continuing their work outside of our offices. As our ENHANCE clinical trial program continues we
are actively monitoring the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the program cost and timelines.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
If the COVID-19 pandemic continues for a significant length of time, we may experience additional disruptions
that could severely impact our business, preclinical studies and clinical trials, including in particular the cost and
timelines of our Phase 3 program and:
delays in receiving approval from local regulatory authorities to initiate our planned clinical trials in certain
countries;
delays or difficulties in enrolling patients in our clinical trials;
delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, active involvement and retention, including difficulties in
recruiting clinical site investigators and clinical site staff;
disruption to manufacturers that could affect the supply and/or delivery of drug product for our clinical trials or
difficulty sourcing key components necessary for the manufacture of ensifentrine drug substance and its derived
formulated products;
delays in clinical sites receiving the supplies and materials needed to conduct our clinical trials, including the
potential for COVID-19 test shortages and interruption in global shipping that may affect the transport of
clinical trial materials and laboratory samples;
changes in local regulations as part of a response to the COVID-19 pandemic which may require us to
undertake additional testing or change the ways in which our clinical trials are conducted, which may result in
unexpected costs, or to discontinue such clinical trials altogether;
27
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials, including the diversion of hospitals
serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our clinical trials;
interruption of key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, due to limitations on travel
imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others, or interruption of clinical trial
subject visits and study procedures, the occurrence of which could affect the integrity of clinical trial data;
risk that participants enrolled in our clinical trials will contract COVID-19 while the clinical trial is ongoing,
which could impact the results of the clinical trial, including by increasing the amount of missing data or the
number of observed adverse events;
interruptions or delays in preclinical studies due to restricted or limited operations at our third party research
and development services;
delays in necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and
contractors due to limitations in employee resources or forced furlough of government employees;
diversion of or limitations on employee resources that would otherwise be focused on the operations of our
business and the conduct of our clinical trials, including because of sickness of employees or their families or
the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people;
higher clinical trial insurance costs and/or delays in operations at insurance agencies, which may impact
timelines for the issuance of insurance coverage policies and local coverage determinations delays; and
refusal of the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to accept data from clinical trials in
affected geographies.
Health regulatory agencies globally may also experience disruptions in their operations as a result of the COVID-19
pandemic. The FDA, EMA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies may have slower response times or be
under-resourced to review or meet to discuss our regulatory submissions, or to continue to monitor our clinical trials
and, as a result, review, inspection and other timelines may be materially delayed.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to rapidly evolve. The extent to which the pandemic impacts our business,
preclinical studies and clinical trials will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be
predicted with confidence, such as the ultimate geographic spread of the disease, the duration of the pandemic, travel
restrictions and social distancing, business closures or business disruptions, the availability and efficacy of vaccines,
and the effectiveness of other actions taken to contain and treat the disease.
While the potential economic impact brought by and the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to
assess or predict, the widespread pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of
global financial markets, reducing our ability to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect our
liquidity. In addition, the recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially
affect our business.
Our limited operating history may make it difficult for investors to evaluate the success of our business to date
and to assess our future viability.
Since our inception in 2005, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing ensifentrine, building
our intellectual property portfolio, developing our supply chain, planning our business, raising capital and providing
general and administrative support for these operations. We have completed multiple Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials for
ensifentrine, but we have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete any Phase 3 or other
registrational clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or arrange for a
third party to do so on our behalf or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product
commercialization. Additionally, we are not profitable and have incurred losses in each year since our inception, and
we expect our financial condition and operating results to continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter
and year to year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Consequently, any predictions
investors make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer
operating history.
The terms of our credit facility place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional
capital through debt financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our
business.
In November 2020, we and Verona Pharma, Inc. (“Verona U.S.”) entered into a loan and security agreement, as
amended (the “Loan Agreement”), with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), pursuant to which a term loan facility in an
28
aggregate amount of up to $30.0 million (the “Term Loan”) is available to us in three tranches. We received the first
tranche of $5.0 million at closing. Only upon satisfaction of certain clinical milestones relating to ensifentrine and
subject to customary terms and conditions will the following be available to the Company: (i) the second tranche
will allow us to borrow an additional amount up to $10.0 million through September 30, 2022, and (ii) the third
tranche will allow us to borrow an additional amount up to $15.0 million through June 30, 2023.
The Term Loan is secured by a lien on substantially all of our and Verona U.S.’s assets, other than the equity
interests of Verona U.S. and other than intellectual property, provided that such lien on substantially all assets
includes any rights to payments and proceeds from the sale, licensing or disposition of intellectual property. We
have also granted SVB a negative pledge with respect to our intellectual property.
The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants and representations, including but not limited to financial
reporting obligations and limitations on dividends, indebtedness, collateral, investments, distributions, transfers,
mergers or acquisitions, taxes, corporate changes, deposit accounts, and subsidiaries. The Loan Agreement also
contains other customary provisions, such as expense reimbursement, non-disclosure obligations as well as
indemnification rights for the benefit of SVB. The Loan Agreement includes a minimum cash covenant triggered
when our consolidated cash and cash equivalents drop below $45.0 million at any time after the occurrence of
certain clinical and/or regulatory event. Upon such trigger, we would be required cash collateralize an amount equal
to the outstanding obligations to SVB plus the amount of any prepayment penalty and a final payment which would
be due in the event the Loan Agreement were prepaid in full with respect to the Term Loans advanced as of such
time. Any such cash collateralization could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial condition.
The events of default under the Loan Agreement include, but are not limited to: (i) insolvency, liquidation,
bankruptcy or similar events; (ii) failure to pay any debts due under the Loan Agreement or other loan documents on
a timely basis; (iii) failure to observe certain covenants under the Loan Agreement; (iv) occurrence of a material
adverse effect; (v) material misrepresentation by us; (vi) occurrence of any default under any other agreement
involving material indebtedness; and (vii) certain material money judgments. If we default under the Loan
Agreement, SVB may accelerate all of our repayment obligations and take control of our and Verona U.S.’s pledged
assets, potentially requiring us to renegotiate our agreement on terms less favorable to us or to immediately cease
operations. Further, if we are liquidated, the lenders’ right to repayment would be senior to the rights of our ADS
holders or shareholders to receive any proceeds from the liquidation. Any declaration by SVB of an event of default
could significantly harm our business and prospects and could cause the price of our ADSs to decline. If we raise
any additional debt financing, the terms of such additional debt could further restrict our operating and financial
flexibility.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our holders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish
rights to our technologies or product candidates.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs
through a combination of securities offerings, debt financings, license and collaboration agreements and research
grants. If we raise capital through securities offerings, the ownership interest of our ADS holders and shareholders
will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect
these holders’ rights as holders of our ADSs. Debt financing, if available, could result in fixed payment obligations,
and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional
debt, to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights, to make capital expenditures, or to declare dividends, or
other operating restrictions. If we raise additional funds through collaboration or licensing agreements, we may have
to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams or product candidates or grant licenses on
terms that may not be favorable to us. In addition, we could also be required to seek funds through arrangements
with collaborators or others at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable. If we raise funds through research
grants, we may be subject to certain requirements, which may limit our ability to use the funds or require us to share
information from our research and development. Raising additional capital through any of these or other means
could adversely affect our business and the holdings or rights of our ADS holders and shareholders, and may cause
the market price of our ADSs to decline.
Our business may become subject to economic, political, regulatory and other risks associated with international
operations.
As a company based in the United Kingdom and listed on Nasdaq, our business is subject to risks associated with
conducting business internationally. Many of our suppliers and collaborative and clinical trial relationships are
located outside the United Kingdom and the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a
variety of factors, including:
29
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular non-U.S. economies and markets;
differing regulatory requirements for drug approvals in non-U.S. countries;
differing jurisdictions could present different issues for securing, maintaining or obtaining freedom to operate in
such jurisdictions;
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
difficulties in compliance with non-U.S. laws and regulations;
changes in non-U.S. regulations and customs, tariffs and trade barriers;
changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates of the euro and currency controls;
changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic environment;
trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements or other restrictive actions by U.S. or non-
U.S. governments;
differing reimbursement regimes and price controls in certain non-U.S. markets;
negative consequences from changes in tax laws;
compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;
workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;
difficulties associated with staffing and managing international operations, including differing labor relations;
production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities
abroad; and
business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters
including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires, or public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19
pandemic.
Our Phase 3 ENHANCE-1 clinical program is being conducted at a number of clinical trial sites in Russia. If the
U.S. or other countries impose further sanctions or other restrictions as a result of the current conflict between
Russia and Ukraine, we may encounter problems transferring funds into Russia to pay the clinical trial sites,
supplying ensifentrine and equipment to trial sites, or which would increase the cost and timelines of our Phase 3
program.
Exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Although we are based in the United Kingdom, our financial statements are denominated in U.S dollars and many of
our business activities are carried out with partners outside the U.S. and United Kingdom and these transactions may
be denominated in another currency. As a result, our business and the price of our ADSs may be affected by
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates not only between the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar, but also the
currencies of other countries, which may have a significant impact on our results of operations and cash flows from
period to period. Currently, we do not have any exchange rate hedging arrangements in place.
Risks Related to Development, Clinical Testing and Regulatory Approval
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome. We may incur
additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and
commercialization of our product candidates.
Our only product candidate, ensifentrine, is in clinical development. Clinical drug development is a lengthy and
expensive process with uncertain timelines and uncertain outcomes. If clinical trials of ensifentrine are prolonged or
delayed, or if ensifentrine in later stage clinical trials fails to show the desired safety and efficacy, we or our
collaborators may be unable to obtain required regulatory approvals and be unable to commercialize ensifentrine on
a timely basis, or at all.
To obtain the requisite regulatory approvals to market and sell ensifentrine, we or any collaborator for ensifentrine
must demonstrate through extensive pre-clinical studies and clinical trials that ensifentrine is safe and effective in
humans. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain.
30
Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of pre-clinical studies and early-stage
clinical trials of ensifentrine may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Product candidates in
later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through
pre-clinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered
significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding
promising results in earlier trials. Our future clinical trial results may not be successful.
We may experience delays in our ongoing clinical trials and we do not know whether planned clinical trials will
begin on time, need to be redesigned, enroll patients on time or be completed on schedule, if at all. Our clinical trials
can be delayed, suspended, or terminated, or the utility of data from these trials may be compromised, for a variety
of reasons, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
inability to generate sufficient preclinical, toxicology or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation or
continuation of clinical trials;
delays in or failure to obtain regulatory agreement on clinical trial design or implementation, including dose and
frequency of administration;
delays in or failure to obtain regulatory authorization to commence a trial;
delays in or failure to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs and clinical trial sites, the
terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and
trial sites;
inability of a CRO to meet their contracted obligations regarding subject enrollment, data collection, data
monitoring, laboratory sample management, programming and analysis or other activities;
delays in or failure to obtain institutional review board (“IRB”), or ethics committee approval at each site;
delays in or failure to recruit suitable patients to participate in a trial;
failure to have patients complete a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;
clinical sites deviating from trial protocol or dropping out of a trial or committing gross misconduct or fraud;
delays to the addition of new clinical trial sites;
inability to achieve or maintain double blinding of ensifentrine;
unexpected technical issues during manufacture of ensifentrine and the corresponding drug products;
variability in drug product performance and/or stability;
discoveries that may reduce the commercial viability of ensifentrine;
inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of ensifentrine for use in clinical trials;
the quality or stability of ensifentrine falling below acceptable standards for either safety or efficacy;
third-party actions claiming infringement by ensifentrine in clinical trials and obtaining injunctions interfering
with our progress;
business interruptions resulting from geo-political actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters
including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires;
trade sanctions imposed by the United States or other governments impacting our ability to transfer money to
certain countries, such as Russia, to pay clinical trials sites in those countries;
safety or tolerability concerns causing us or our collaborators, as applicable, to suspend or terminate a trial if we
or our collaborators find that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;
changes in regulatory requirements, policies and guidelines;
lower than anticipated retention rates of patients and volunteers in clinical trials;
failure of our third-party research contractors to comply with regulatory requirements or to meet their
contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all; and
difficulty in certain countries in identifying the sub-populations that we are trying to evaluate in a particular
trial, which may delay enrollment.
31
In addition, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may increase the likelihood that we encounter such
difficulties or delays in initiating, enrolling, conducting or completing our planned and ongoing clinical trials. We
could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions in which
such trials are being conducted, by the Data Review Committee or Data Safety Monitoring Board for such trial or by
the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination due to a
number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our
clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities
resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a
benefit from using a drug, failure of our clinical trials to demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety, changes in
governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.
Moreover, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from
time to time and receive compensation in connection with such services. Under certain circumstances, we may be
required to report some of these relationships to the FDA or other regulatory authority. The FDA or other regulatory
authority may conclude that a financial relationship between us and a principal investigator has created a conflict of
interest or otherwise affected interpretation of the study. The FDA or other regulatory authority may therefore
question the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site and the utility of the clinical trial itself
may be jeopardized. This could result in a delay in approval, or rejection, of our marketing applications by the FDA
or other regulatory authority, as the case may be, and may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of
ensifentrine.
If we experience delays in the completion of any clinical trial of ensifentrine or any clinical trial of ensifentrine is
terminated, the commercial prospects of ensifentrine may be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues
from ensifentrine, if any, will be delayed. Moreover, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our
costs, slow down the development and approval process of ensifentrine and jeopardize our ability to commence
product sales and generate revenue, if any. Significant clinical trial delays could also allow our competitors to bring
products to market before we do or shorten any periods during which we have the exclusive right to commercialize
ensifentrine and could impair our ability to commercialize ensifentrine. In addition, many of the factors that cause,
or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of
regulatory approval of ensifentrine.
Clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with the laws and regulations of the FDA, EU rules and regulations
and other applicable regulatory authorities’ legal requirements, regulations or guidelines, and are subject to oversight
by these governmental agencies and IRBs (or other ethics committees) at the medical institutions where the clinical
trials are conducted. In addition, clinical trials must be conducted with supplies of ensifentrine produced under
current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, requirements and other regulations. Furthermore, we rely on CROs
and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials and while we have agreements
governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. We depend on our
collaborators and on medical institutions and CROs to conduct our clinical trials in compliance with good clinical
practice, or GCP, requirements. To the extent our collaborators or the CROs fail to enroll participants for our clinical
trials, fail to conduct the study to GCP standards or are delayed for a significant time in the execution of trials,
including achieving full enrollment, we may be affected by increased costs, program delays or both. In addition,
clinical trials that are conducted in countries outside the EU and the United States may subject us to further delays
and expenses as a result of increased shipment costs, additional regulatory requirements and the engagement of non-
EU and non-U.S. CROs, as well as expose us to risks associated with clinical investigators who are unknown to the
FDA or the EMA, and different standards of diagnosis, screening and medical care.
Ensifentrine may have serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects which may delay or prevent
marketing approval. If such side effects are identified during the development of ensifentrine or following
approval, if any, we may need to abandon our development of ensifentrine, the commercial profile of any
approved label may be limited, or we may be subject to other significant negative consequences following
marketing approval, if any.
Undesirable side effects that may be caused by ensifentrine could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt,
delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by
the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities. During the conduct of clinical trials, patients report changes in
their health, including illnesses, injuries, and discomforts, to their study doctor. Often, it is not possible to determine
whether or not the product candidate being studied caused these conditions. It is possible that as we test our product
candidates in larger, longer and more extensive clinical trials, or as use of these product candidates becomes more
widespread if they receive regulatory approval, illnesses, injuries, discomforts and other adverse events that were
observed in previous trials, as well as conditions that did not occur or went undetected in previous trials, will be
32
reported by patients. Many times, side effects are only detectable after investigational products are tested in large-
scale clinical trials or, in some cases, after they are made available to patients on a commercial scale following
approval. We have completed 19 Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of ensifentrine. In these trials, some patients have
experienced mild to moderate adverse reactions, including headache, cough, worsening of COPD, nasopharyngitis
and hypertension.
Results of our future clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of adverse side
effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA or other comparable foreign
regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of ensifentrine for any or all
targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients
to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. Additionally, if ensifentrine receives marketing
approval and we or others later identify undesirable or unacceptable side effects caused by ensifentrine, a number of
potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
regulatory authorities may withdraw approvals of such products and require us to take ensifentrine off the
market;
regulatory authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, specific warnings, a contraindication or
field alerts to physicians and pharmacies;
regulatory authorities may require a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to
patients, or that we implement a REMS plan or similar risk management measures to ensure that the benefits of
ensifentrine outweigh its risks;
we may be required to change the way ensifentrine is administered, conduct additional clinical trials or change
the labeling of ensifentrine;
we may be subject to limitations on how we may promote ensifentrine;
sales of ensifentrine may decrease significantly;
we may be subject to litigation or product liability claims; and
our reputation may suffer.
Any of these events could prevent us or any collaborators from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of
ensifentrine or could substantially increase commercialization costs and expenses, which in turn could delay or
prevent us from generating significant revenue from the sale of ensifentrine.
We may not be successful in our efforts to develop ensifentrine for multiple indications, including asthma, CF or
other respiratory diseases.
Part of our strategy is to continue to develop ensifentrine in indications other than COPD, such as CF and asthma.
Although our research and development efforts to date have suggested that ensifentrine has the potential to treat CF
and asthma, we may not be able to develop ensifentrine in these indications or any other disease, or development
may not be successful. In addition, the potential use of ensifentrine in other diseases may not be suitable for clinical
development, including as a result of difficulties enrolling patients in any clinical studies we plan to initiate or the
potential for harmful side effects or other characteristics that might suggest marketing approval and market
acceptance are unlikely. If we do not continue to successfully develop and begin to commercialize ensifentrine for
multiple indications, we will face difficulty in obtaining product revenues in future periods, which could
significantly harm our financial position.
We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical trials for ensifentrine. If we are unable to enroll patients in
our clinical trials, or enrollment is slower than anticipated, our research and development efforts could be
adversely affected.
Successful and timely completion of clinical trials for ensifentrine will require that we enroll a sufficient number of
patient candidates. Trials may be subject to delays as a result of patient enrollment taking longer than anticipated or
patient withdrawal and other external factors including COVID-19. Patient enrollment depends on many factors,
including the size and nature of the patient population, the severity of the disease under investigation, eligibility
criteria for the trial, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the design of the clinical protocol, the ability to obtain
and maintain patient consents, the risk that enrolled patients will drop out of a trial, the availability of competing
clinical trials, the availability of new drugs approved for the indication the clinical trial is investigating and
clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other
available therapies. These factors may make it difficult for us to enroll enough patients to complete our clinical trials
33
in a timely and cost-effective manner. Higher than expected numbers of patients could also discontinue participation
in the clinical trials. Delays in the completion of any clinical trial of ensifentrine will increase our costs, slow down
our development and approval of ensifentrine and delay or potentially jeopardize our ability to commence product
sales and generate revenue. In addition, some of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or
completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of ensifentrine.
We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims, either when testing ensifentrine in the clinic or
at the commercial stage, and our product liability insurance may not cover all damages from such claims.
We are exposed to potential product liability and professional indemnity risks that are inherent in the research,
development, manufacturing, marketing and use of pharmaceutical products. Currently, we have no products that
have been approved for commercial sale; however, the current and future use of ensifentrine by us and any
collaborators in clinical trials, and the sale of ensifentrine, if approved, in the future, may expose us to liability
claims. These claims might be made by patients that use the product, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical
companies, our collaborators or others selling ensifentrine. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could be
difficult and costly to defend and could adversely affect the market for ensifentrine or any prospects for
commercialization of ensifentrine. In addition, regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, liability claims may
result in:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
decreased demand for ensifentrine;
injury to our reputation;
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
costs to defend related litigation;
diversion of management’s time and our resources;
substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients;
regulatory investigation, product recalls or withdrawals, or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;
loss of revenue; and
the inability to commercialize or promote ensifentrine.
Although the clinical trial process is designed to identify and assess potential side effects, it is always possible that a
drug, even after regulatory approval, may exhibit unforeseen side effects. If ensifentrine were to cause adverse side
effects during clinical trials or after approval, we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. Physicians and patients
may not comply with any warnings that identify known potential adverse effects and patients who should not use
ensifentrine.
Although we maintain product liability insurance for ensifentrine, it is possible that our liabilities could exceed our
insurance coverage. We intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we
obtain marketing approval for ensifentrine. However, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a
reasonable cost or obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. If a
successful product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of
insured liabilities, our assets may not be sufficient to cover such claims and our business operations could be
impaired.
The regulatory approval processes of the FDA, the EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are
lengthy, time consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory
approval for ensifentrine, our business will be substantially harmed.
The time required to obtain approval by the FDA, the European Commission and comparable foreign regulatory
authorities is unpredictable, but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and
depends upon numerous factors, including substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. In addition, approval
policies, regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the
course of a product candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions. We have not obtained
regulatory approval for ensifentrine and it is possible that ensifentrine or any product candidates we may develop in
the future will never obtain regulatory approval.
Prior to obtaining approval to commercialize a product candidate in the United States or abroad, we or our
collaborators must demonstrate with substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, and to the satisfaction
of the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies, that such product candidate is safe and effective for its intended uses.
34
Results from nonclinical studies and clinical trials can be interpreted in different ways. Even if we believe the
nonclinical or clinical data for our product candidate are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support
approval by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. The FDA or foreign regulatory agencies may also require us
to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials for ensifentrine either prior to or post-approval, or it may
object to elements of our clinical development program.
Ensifentrine could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory
authorities that ensifentrine is safe and effective, with the required level of statistical significance, for its
proposed indication;
we may be unable to demonstrate that ensifentrine’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;
the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data
from pre-clinical studies or clinical trials or may find the data to be unacceptable;
the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may find that the dose or doses evaluated in
Phase 3 clinical trials or the way in which double blinding was effected to be unacceptable;
the data collected from clinical trials of ensifentrine may, for other reasons, not be sufficient to support the
submission of an NDA in the United States, a marketing authorization application (“MAA”) in the EU, or other
comparable submission to obtain regulatory approval in other countries;
the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve the manufacturing processes or
facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies;
the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly
change in a manner rendering our clinical data insufficient for approval;
the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or
implementation of our clinical trials; and
the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our proposed product
specifications and performance characteristics.
This lengthy approval process as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results may result in our failing to
obtain regulatory approval to market ensifentrine. The FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities have
substantial discretion in the approval process, and determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained
for ensifentrine. Even if we believe the data collected from clinical trials of ensifentrine are promising, such data
may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA, the European Commission or any other regulatory authority.
In addition, even if we were to obtain approval for any jurisdiction, regulatory authorities may approve ensifentrine
for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve the price we intend to charge for
ensifentrine, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may
approve ensifentrine with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful
commercialization of ensifentrine. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects
for ensifentrine.
Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns
could hinder their ability to hire, retain or deploy key leadership and other personnel, or otherwise prevent new or
modified products from being developed, approved or commercialized in a timely manner or at all, which could
negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities to review and approve new products can be affected by a
variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, statutory, regulatory, and policy changes, the
FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees,
and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s or foreign regulatory authorities’ ability to perform routine
functions. Average review times at the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities have fluctuated in recent years as a
result. In addition, government funding of other government agencies that fund research and development activities
is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA and other
agencies, such as the EMA following its relocation to Amsterdam and resulting staff changes, may also slow the
time necessary for new drugs, or modifications to cleared or approved drugs, to be reviewed and/or approved by
necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years,
35
the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, have had to
furlough critical FDA employees and stop critical activities.
Separately, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the FDA announced its intention to postpone
most inspections of foreign manufacturing facilities, and on March 18, 2020, the FDA temporarily postponed routine
surveillance inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities. Subsequently, in July 2020, the FDA resumed certain
on-site inspections of domestic manufacturing facilities subject to a risk-based prioritization system. The FDA
utilized this risk-based assessment system to assist in determining when and where it was safest to conduct
prioritized domestic inspections. Additionally, on April 14, 2021, the FDA issued a guidance document in which the
FDA described its plans to conduct voluntary remote interactive evaluations of certain drug manufacturing facilities
and clinical research sites, among other facilities. According to the guidance, the FDA may request such remote
interactive evaluations where the FDA determines that remote evaluation would be appropriate based on mission
needs and travel limitations. In May 2021, the FDA outlined a detailed plan to move toward a more consistent state
of inspectional operations, and in July 2021, the FDA resumed standard inspectional operations of domestic
facilities and was continuing to maintain this level of operation as of September 2021. More recently, the FDA has
continued to monitor and implement changes to its inspectional activities to ensure the safety of its employees and
those of the firms it regulates as it adapts to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. Regulatory authorities outside the
United States have adopted similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. If a
prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA or other
regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could
significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory authorities to timely review and process our
regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Even if ensifentrine obtains regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued
regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, ensifentrine, if approved,
could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal and we may be subject to penalties if we
fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with ensifentrine.
If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority approves ensifentrine, the manufacturing processes,
labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and record keeping for
ensifentrine will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include payment
of annual user fees, submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, facility registration and
drug listing, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and similar foreign requirements for the manufacture of
ensifentrine and GCP requirements for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval, all of which may result in
significant expense and limit our ability to commercialize ensifentrine. In addition, any approval we may obtain for
ensifentrine may contain significant limitations related to use restrictions for specified age groups, warnings,
precautions or contraindications, and may include burdensome post-approval study or risk management
requirements. For example, the FDA may require a REMS in order to approve our product candidates, which could
entail requirements for a medication guide, physician training and communication plans or additional elements to
ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools.
We and our contract manufacturers will also be subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and other regulatory
authorities to monitor compliance with these requirements and the terms of any product approval we may obtain. If
we or a regulatory authority discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of
unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facilities where the product is manufactured, a regulatory
authority may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us, including requiring recall or
withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. In addition, failure to comply with FDA
and other comparable foreign regulatory requirements may subject our company to administrative or judicially
imposed sanctions, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
delays in or the rejection of product approvals;
restrictions on our ability to conduct clinical trials, including full or partial clinical holds on ongoing or planned
trials;
restrictions on the products, manufacturers or manufacturing process;
warning or untitled letters;
civil and criminal penalties;
injunctions;
suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals;
36
•
•
•
•
product seizures, detentions or import bans;
voluntary or mandatory product recalls and publicity requirements;
total or partial suspension of production; and
imposition of restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements.
The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize ensifentrine and
generate revenue and could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate
negative publicity.
In addition, the policies of the FDA and of other regulatory authorities may change and additional government
regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes
in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory
compliance, we may be subject to enforcement action and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of
off-label uses.
If ensifentrine is approved for any indication and we are found to have improperly promoted off-label uses for
ensifentrine, we may become subject to significant liability. The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate
the promotional claims that may be made about prescription products, such as our product candidates, if approved.
In particular, a product may not be promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA or such other regulatory
agencies as reflected in the product’s approved labeling. If we receive marketing approval for a product candidate,
physicians may nevertheless prescribe it to their patients in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved label. If
we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability. The U.S. federal
government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion of off-label
use and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA has also requested that
companies enter into consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is
changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion of ensifentrine, if approved, we could become
subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.
In Europe, off-label use is not per se regulated by the EU pharmaceutical legislation and a difference is made
between the strict regulation of medicinal product and the use of medicinal products in medical practice. Off-label
use is deferred to national regulation and may vary depending on the EU Member State(s).
Even if we obtain marketing approval of ensifentrine for any indication in a major pharmaceutical market such
as the United States or EU, we may never obtain approval or commercialize ensifentrine in other major markets,
which would limit our ability to realize its full market potential.
In order to market any products in a country or territory, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying
regulatory requirements of such country or territory regarding safety and efficacy. Clinical trials conducted in one
country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country
does not mean that regulatory approval will be obtained in any other country. Approval procedures vary among
countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods.
Seeking regulatory approvals in all major markets could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and
may require additional pre-clinical studies or clinical trials which would be costly and time consuming. Regulatory
requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of ensifentrine in
those countries. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject
to unanticipated delays. In addition, our failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have
negative effects on the process for regulatory approval in other countries. We currently do not have any product
candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, whether in the EU, the United States or any other international
markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we fail to
comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, our
target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of ensifentrine will be compromised.
Our employees and independent contractors, including principal investigators, consultants, vendors and
collaboration partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with
regulatory standards and requirements.
37
We are exposed to the risk that our employees and independent contractors, including principal investigators,
consultants, vendors and collaboration partners may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activities.
Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless or negligent conduct or unauthorized activities that
violate: (i) the laws and regulations of the FDA and other similar regulatory bodies and the EU, including those laws
that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such authorities; (ii) manufacturing
standards; (iii) federal and state data privacy, security, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations in
the United States and abroad; or (iv) laws that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate financial
information and data. Specifically, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject
to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive
practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and
promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Activities subject to
these laws could also involve the improper use or misrepresentation of information obtained in the course of clinical
trials, creating fraudulent data in our pre-clinical studies or clinical trials or illegal misappropriation of drug product,
which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to
identify and deter misconduct by employees and other third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and
prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us
from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with such laws or
regulations. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person or government could allege such fraud or other
misconduct, even if none occurred. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in
defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results
of operations, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary
fines, disgorgements, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other U.S. federal healthcare
programs or healthcare programs in other jurisdictions, integrity oversight and reporting obligations to resolve
allegations of non-compliance, individual imprisonment, other sanctions, contractual damages, reputational harm,
diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations.
Interim, “top-line,” or preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time
may change as more patient data become available and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could
result in material changes in the final data.
From time to time, we may publicly disclose top-line or preliminary data from our clinical trials, which is based on a
preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to
change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular study or trial. We also make
assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have received
or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the top-line or preliminary results that we
report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such
results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Top-line or preliminary data also remain subject
to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the top-line or
preliminary data we previously published. As a result, top-line and preliminary data should be viewed with caution
until the final data are available.
From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Interim data
from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may
materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences
between interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.
Further, others, including regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations,
conclusions or analyses or may interpret or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value
of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization of the particular product candidate or product and
our company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose regarding a particular study or
clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with what we
determine is material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure.
If the interim, top-line or preliminary data that we report differ from actual results, or if others, including regulatory
authorities, disagree with the conclusions reached, our ability to obtain approval for, and commercialize, our product
candidates may be harmed, which could harm our business, operating results, prospects or financial condition.
Risks Related to Healthcare Laws and Other Legal Compliance Matters
Enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and
commercialize ensifentrine and may affect the prices we may set.
38
In the United States, the EU and other foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and we expect there will continue to be,
a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes to the healthcare system that could affect our
future results of operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S.
federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs and improve the quality of healthcare. For example, in
March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act, or collectively the ACA, was enacted, which substantially changes the way healthcare is
financed by both governmental and private insurers. Among the provisions of the ACA, those of greatest importance
to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
an annual, non-deductible fee payable by any entity that manufactures or imports certain branded prescription
drugs and biologic agents, which is apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain
government healthcare programs;
a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer point-of-
sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap
period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;
an increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate
Program to 23.1% and 13.0% of the average manufacturer price for branded and generic drugs, respectively;
a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are
calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected;
extension of a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are
enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations;
expansion of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid
coverage to certain individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially
increasing a manufacturer’s Medicaid rebate liability;
a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative
clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research; and
establishment of a Center for Medicare Innovation at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS,
to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending, potentially
including prescription drug spending.
Since its enactment, there have been judicial, executive and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA.
On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by
several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision,
President Biden issued an executive order initiating a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through
August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive
order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that
limit access to healthcare.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was
enacted. For example, the Budget Control Act of 2011 has, among other things, led to aggregate reductions of
Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which, due to subsequent legislative amendments to the
statute, will remain in effect through 2030, with the exception of a temporary suspension from May 1, 2020 through
March 31, 2022, unless additional action is taken by Congress. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief
Act of 2012 was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several types of
providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations
period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These laws and any laws
enacted in the future may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other health care funding, which could
have a material adverse effect on our customers and accordingly, our financial operations.
Moreover, payment methodologies may be subject to changes in healthcare legislation and regulatory initiatives. For
example, CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. In addition,
recently there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for
their marketed products. We expect that additional U.S. federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the
future, any of which could limit the amounts that the U.S. federal government will pay for healthcare products and
services, which could result in reduced demand for ensifentrine or additional pricing pressures.
39
Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly active in passing legislation and implementing
regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient
reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and
transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk
purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could
harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare
authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical
products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could
reduce the ultimate demand for ensifentrine or put pressure on our product pricing.
In the EU, similar political, economic and regulatory developments may affect our ability to profitably
commercialize ensifentrine, if approved. In addition to continuing pressure on prices and cost containment measures,
legislative developments at the EU or member state level may result in significant additional requirements or
obstacles that may increase our operating costs. The delivery of health care in the EU, including the establishment
and operation of health services and the pricing and reimbursement of medicines, is almost exclusively a matter for
national, rather than EU, law and policy. National governments and health service providers have different priorities
and approaches to the delivery of health care and the pricing and reimbursement of products in that context. In
general, however, the healthcare budgetary constraints in most EU member states have resulted in restrictions on the
pricing and reimbursement of medicines by relevant health service providers. Coupled with ever-increasing EU and
national regulatory burdens on those wishing to develop and market products, this could prevent or delay marketing
approval of ensifentrine, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to commercialize
ensifentrine, if approved. In international markets, reimbursement and healthcare payment systems vary significantly
by country, and many countries have instituted price ceilings on specific products and therapies.
We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we or our collaborators are slow or unable to adapt to
changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or our collaborators are
not able to maintain regulatory compliance, ensifentrine may lose any regulatory approval that may have been
obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.
Our business operations and current and future relationships with investigators, healthcare professionals,
consultants, third-party payors and customers will be subject to applicable healthcare regulatory laws, which
could expose us to penalties.
Our business operations and current and future arrangements with investigators, healthcare professionals,
consultants, third-party payors and customers, may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other
healthcare laws and regulations. These laws may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships
through which we conduct our operations, including how we research, market, sell and distribute ensifentrine, if
approved. Such laws include:
•
•
•
the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly
and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or
certain rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for,
either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, lease, order or recommendation of, any good, facility,
item or service, for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under U.S. federal and state healthcare
programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the
statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;
the U.S. federal false claims and civil monetary penalties laws, including the civil False Claims Act, which,
among other things, impose criminal and civil penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam
actions, against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the U.S. federal
government, claims for payment or approval that are false or fraudulent, knowingly making, using or causing to
be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim, or from knowingly making a
false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the U.S. federal government. In
addition, the government may assert that a claim including items and services resulting from a violation of the
U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act;
the U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which imposes
criminal and civil liability for, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute,
a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or
covering up a material fact or making any materially false statement, in connection with the delivery of, or
payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services; similar to the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person
40
•
•
•
•
or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have
committed a violation;
the FDCA, which prohibits, among other things, the adulteration or misbranding of drugs, biologics and medical
devices;
the U.S. federal legislation commonly referred to as Physician Payments Sunshine Act, enacted as part of the
ACA, and its implementing regulations, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and
medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program
to report annually to the government information related to certain payments and other transfers of value to
physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), certain non-
physician practitioners (physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse
anesthetists, anesthesiology assistants and certified nurse-midwives), and teaching hospitals, as well as
ownership and investment interests held by the physicians described above and their immediate family
members;
analogous state laws and regulations, including: state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to
our business practices, including but not limited to, research, distribution, sales and marketing arrangements and
claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers;
state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary
compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or
otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and other potential referral sources; and
state laws and regulations that require drug manufacturers to file reports relating to pricing and marketing
information, which requires tracking gifts and other remuneration and items of value provided to healthcare
professionals and entities; and state laws governing the privacy and security of health-related and other personal
information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not
preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts; and
in the EU, interactions between pharmaceutical companies and health care professionals and health care
organizations, are also governed by strict laws, regulations, industry self-regulation codes of conduct and
physicians’ codes of professional conduct both at EU level and in the individual EU member states. The
provision of benefits or advantages to physicians to induce or encourage the prescription, recommendation,
endorsement, purchase, supply, order or use of pharmaceutical products is prohibited in the EU. Relationships
with healthcare professionals and associations are subject to stringent anti-gift statutes and anti-bribery laws, the
scope of which differs across the EU. In addition, national “Sunshine Acts” may require pharmaceutical
companies to report/publish transfers of value provided to health care professionals and associations on a
regular (e.g. annual) basis. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in reputational risk, public
reprimands, administrative penalties, fines or imprisonment;
Ensuring that our internal operations and business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare
laws and regulations involves substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our
business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving
applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of
any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws and regulations that may apply to us, we may be
subject to significant penalties, including civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from
U.S. government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, or similar programs in other
countries or jurisdictions, a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-
compliance with these laws, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, contractual damages, reputational harm,
diminished profits and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers
or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to not be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be
subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare
programs and imprisonment, which could affect our ability to operate our business. Further, defending against any
such actions can be costly, time-consuming and may require significant personnel resources. Therefore, even if we
are successful in defending against any such actions that may be brought against us, our business may be impaired.
Actual or perceived failures to comply with applicable data protection, privacy and security laws, regulations,
standards and other requirements could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The global data protection landscape is rapidly evolving, and we are or may become subject to numerous state,
federal and foreign laws, requirements and regulations governing the collection, use, disclosure, retention, and
security of personal information, such as information that we may collect in connection with clinical trials.
Implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we
41
cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or perception of their requirements may have on
our business. This evolution may create uncertainty in our business, affect our ability to operate in certain
jurisdictions or to collect, store, transfer use and share personal information, necessitate the acceptance of more
onerous obligations in our contracts, result in liability or impose additional costs on us. The cost of compliance with
these laws, regulations and standards is high and is likely to increase in the future. Any failure or perceived failure
by us to comply with federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, our internal policies and procedures or our
contracts governing our processing of personal information could result in negative publicity, government
investigations and enforcement actions, claims by third parties and damage to our reputation, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation, and financial condition.
As our operations and business grow, we may become subject to or affected by new or additional data protection
laws and regulations and face increased scrutiny or attention from regulatory authorities. In the United States,
HIPAA imposes, among other things, certain standards relating to the privacy, security, transmission and breach
reporting of individually identifiable health information. Most healthcare providers, including research institutions
from which we obtain patient health information, are subject to privacy and security regulations promulgated under
HIPAA. We do not believe that we are currently acting as a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA and
thus are not directly subject to its requirements or penalties. However, depending on the facts and circumstances, we
could face substantial criminal penalties if we knowingly receive individually identifiable health information from a
HIPAA-covered healthcare provider or research institution that has not satisfied HIPAA’s requirements for
disclosure of individually identifiable health information.
Certain states have also adopted comparable privacy and security laws and regulations, some of which may be more
stringent than HIPAA. Such laws and regulations will be subject to interpretation by various courts and other
governmental authorities, thus creating potentially complex compliance issues for us and our future customers and
strategic partners. For example, California recently enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, (“CCPA”), which
went into effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA, among other things, creates data privacy obligations for covered
companies and provides privacy rights to California consumers, including rights to access and delete their
information, to opt out of certain information sharing, and receive detailed information about how their personal
information is used. The CCPA also creates a private right of action with statutory damages for certain data
breaches, thereby potentially increasing risks associated with a data breach. Although the law includes limited
exceptions for health-related information, it may regulate or impact our processing of personal information
depending on the context.Further, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) recently passed in California. The
CPRA significantly amends the CCPA and will impose additional data protection obligations on covered businesses,
including additional consumer rights processes, limitations on data uses, new audit requirements for higher risk data,
and opt outs for certain uses of sensitive data. It will also create a new California data protection agency authorized
to issue substantive regulations and could result in increased privacy and information security enforcement. The
majority of the provisions will go into effect on January 1, 2023, and additional compliance investment and potential
business process changes may be required. Similar laws have passed in Virginia and Colorado, and have been
proposed in other states and at the federal level, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the
United States. The enactment of such laws could have potentially conflicting requirements that would make
compliance challenging. In the event that we are subject to or affected by HIPAA, the CCPA, the CPRA or other
domestic privacy and data protection laws, any liability from failure to comply with the requirements of these laws
could adversely affect our financial condition.
We are also subject to diverse laws and regulations relating to data privacy and security in the EU and the EEA,
including the GDPR. The GDPR went into effect in May 2018 and imposes strict requirements for processing the
personal data of individuals within the EEA. The GDPR imposes strict obligations on the ability to process health-
related and other personal data of individuals within the EEA, including in relation to use, collection, analysis, and
transfer (including cross-border transfer) of such personal data. The law is also developing rapidly and, in July 2020,
the Court of Justice of the EU limited how organizations could lawfully transfer personal data from the EEA to the
U.S. In addition, EU and EEA member states may impose further obligations relating to the processing of genetic,
biometric or health data, which could further add to our compliance costs and limit how we process this information.
Companies that must comply with the GDPR face increased compliance obligations and risk, including more robust
regulatory enforcement of data protection requirements and potential fines for noncompliance of up to €20 million
or 4% of the annual global revenues of the noncompliant company, whichever is greater. Relatedly, following the
United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the EEA and the European Union, and the expiry of the transition period,
companies have to comply with both the GDPR and the GDPR as incorporated into United Kingdom national law,
the latter regime having the ability to separately fine up to the greater of £17.5 million or 4% of global turnover. The
relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union in relation to certain aspects of data protection
42
law remains unclear, for example around how data can lawfully be transferred between each jurisdiction, which
exposes us to further compliance risk.
Pursuant to the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement of December 24, 2020, transfers of personal data from
the European Union to the United Kingdom may continue to take place without a need for additional safeguards
during a further transition period, to expire on (1) the date on which an adequacy decision with respect to the United
Kingdom is adopted by the EU Commission; or (2) the expiry of four months, which shall be extended by a further
two months unless either the European Union or the United Kingdom objects. It remains unclear whether the EU
Commission will adopt an adequacy decision with respect to the United Kingdom. In the absence of such decision
after the expiry of the additional transition period, companies may need to put in place additional safeguards for
transfers of personal data from the European Union to the United Kingdom, such as standard contractual clauses
approved by the EU Commission.
We are also subject to evolving European privacy laws on cookies, and if we commence any EU marketing
campaigns, also on e-marketing. The EU is in the process of replacing the e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC) with a
new set of rules taking the form of a regulation, which will be directly implemented in the laws of each European
Member State. The draft e-Privacy Regulation imposes strict opt-in marketing rules with limited exceptions for
business-to-business communications, alters rules on third-party cookies, web beacons and similar technology and
significantly increases fining powers to the greater of €20 million or 4% of total global annual revenue. While the e-
Privacy Regulation was originally intended to be adopted on May 25, 2018 (alongside the GDPR), it is still going
through the European legislative process.
Compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations could require us to take on more onerous
obligations in our contracts, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our ability
to operate in certain jurisdictions. Failure by us or our collaborators and third-party providers to comply with
applicable data protection laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (which could include
civil or criminal penalties), private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating
results and business. Moreover, clinical trial subjects about whom we or our potential collaborators obtain
information, as well as the providers who share this information with us, may contractually limit our ability to use
and disclose such information. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights, failed to comply with data
protection laws or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time
consuming to defend, could result in adverse publicity and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and we may become exposed to liability
and substantial expenses in connection with environmental compliance or remediation activities.
Our sub-contracted operations, including our research, development, testing and manufacturing activities, are subject
to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern, among other
things, the controlled use, handling, release and disposal of and the maintenance of a registry for, hazardous
materials and biological materials, such as chemical solvents, human cells, carcinogenic compounds, mutagenic
compounds and compounds that have a toxic effect on reproduction, laboratory procedures and exposure to blood-
borne pathogens. If we fail to comply with such laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines or other
sanctions.
As with other companies engaged in activities similar to ours, we face a risk of environmental liability inherent in
our current and historical activities, including liability relating to releases of or exposure to hazardous or biological
materials. Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are becoming more stringent. We may be required
to incur substantial expenses in connection with future environmental compliance or remediation activities, in which
case, our production and development efforts may be interrupted or delayed.
We are subject to anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other
laws governing our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be subject to civil or criminal
penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or Bribery Act, the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we do
business and may do business in the future. The Bribery Act, FCPA and these other laws generally prohibit us, our
officers and our employees and intermediaries from bribing, being bribed or making other prohibited payments to
government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. We may in
the future operate in jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential Bribery Act or FCPA violations, and we may
participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose actions could potentially subject us to liability
43
under the Bribery Act, FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect
of future regulatory requirements to which any of our international operations might be subject or the manner in
which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
We also are subject to other laws and regulations governing any international operations, including regulations
administered by the governments of the United Kingdom and the United States, and authorities in the EU, including
applicable export control regulations, economic sanctions on countries and persons, customs requirements and
currency exchange regulations, or, collectively, the Trade Control laws. In particular, we have engaged a number of
clinical trial sites in Russia in connection with our Phase 3 ENHANCE clinical program and, with the current
tensions between Russia and Ukraine, there is an increased risk that the United States or other governments impose
sanctions that impact our ability to pay the clinical sites and continue to conduct our clinical program in Russia,
which would increase the cost and timeline of our Phase 3 program.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti-
corruption laws, including the Bribery Act, the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade Control laws. If
we are not in compliance with the Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws, we
may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures and legal
expenses. Any investigation of any potential violations of the Bribery Act, the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or
Trade Control laws by U.K., U.S. or other authorities, even if it is ultimately determined that we did not violate such
laws, could be costly and time consuming, require significant personnel resources and harm our reputation.
We will seek to build and continuously improve our systems of internal controls and to remedy any weaknesses
identified. There can be no assurance, however, that the policies and procedures will be followed at all times or
effectively detect and prevent violations of the applicable laws by one or more of our employees, consultants, agents
or collaborators and, as a result, we could be subject to fines, penalties or prosecution.
Risks Related to Commercialization
We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing industry, which may result in others discovering,
developing or commercializing competing products before or more successfully than we do.
The biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid
technological change. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to discover, develop and obtain marketing
approval for new products on a cost-effective basis and to market them successfully. If ensifentrine is approved for
any indication, we will face intense competition from a variety of businesses, including large, fully integrated
pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biopharmaceutical companies, academic
institutions, government agencies and other private and public research institutions in Europe, the United States and
other jurisdictions. These organizations may have significantly greater resources than we do and conduct similar
research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing
and marketing of products that may compete with ensifentrine.
Given the number of products already on the market to treat COPD, asthma and CF, we expect to face intense
competition if ensifentrine is approved for these indications. Companies including Boehringer Ingelheim,
GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Vertex, Viatris, Theravance, Gilead, Genentech and Sunovion currently
have treatments on the market for COPD, CF and asthma, and we anticipate that new companies will enter these
markets in the future. If we successfully develop and commercialize ensifentrine, it will compete with existing
therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future. The highly competitive nature of, and rapid
technological changes in, the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries could render ensifentrine obsolete,
less competitive or uneconomical. Our competitors may, among other things:
•
•
•
•
•
have significantly greater name recognition, financial, manufacturing, marketing, drug development, technical
and human resources than we do, and future mergers and acquisitions in the biopharmaceutical and
pharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated in our competitors;
develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, less expensive, more convenient or easier to
administer, or have fewer or less severe side effects;
obtain quicker regulatory approval;
establish superior proprietary positions covering our products and technologies;
implement more effective approaches to sales and marketing; or
44
•
form more advantageous strategic alliances.
Smaller and other early stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through
collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting
and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration
for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. In addition,
any collaborators we may have may decide to market and sell products that compete with ensifentrine. Our
commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that
are more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than
ensifentrine. Our competitors may also obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their product candidates more
rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing or strengthening
their market position before we are able to enter the market.
We may be unable to obtain orphan drug designation from the FDA or similar foreign authorities for
ensifentrine for the treatment of CF, and even if we do obtain such designations, we may be unable to obtain or
maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for orphan drug
exclusivity.
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a product as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare
disease or condition, defined as one occurring in a patient population of fewer than 200,000 in the United States, or a
patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of
developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the EU, orphan drug designation may be
granted to promote the development of products (1) that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment that
is life-threatening or chronically debilitating, and (2) either (a) such condition affects no more than five in 10,000
persons in the EU when the application is made, or (b) the product, without the benefits derived from orphan status,
would be unlikely to generate sufficient returns in the EU to justify the necessary investment, and (3) there exists no
satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the EU, or, if
such a method exists, the medicine must be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition.
In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant
funding toward clinical trial costs, tax credits for qualified clinical testing and application fee waivers. In addition, if
a product receives the first FDA approval of that drug for the indication for which it has orphan designation, the
product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to
market the same drug for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a
showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to
assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the orphan drug to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or
condition. Under the FDA’s regulations, the FDA will deny orphan drug exclusivity to a designated drug upon
approval if the FDA has already approved another drug with the same active ingredient for the same indication,
unless the drug is demonstrated to be clinically superior to the previously approved drug. In the EU, orphan drug
designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers. Upon grant of a
marketing authorization, orphan medicinal products are entitled to ten years of market exclusivity, during which
time no similar medicinal product for the same indication may be placed on the market. This period may be reduced
to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the orphan designation
criteria, including where it is shown that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market
exclusivity.
We may seek orphan drug designation from the FDA and the European Commission for ensifentrine for the
treatment of CF. Even if we are able to obtain orphan designation for ensifentrine in the United States and/or the EU,
we may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for any particular orphan indication due to the uncertainties
associated with developing pharmaceutical products, which could prevent us from marketing ensifentrine if another
company is able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity before we do. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the
United States and/or the EU may be unavailable if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-
designated indication or may be lost if the FDA and/or foreign regulatory authorities later determine that the request
for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the
needs of patients with the rare disease or condition following approval. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug
exclusivity for ensifentrine, that exclusivity may not effectively protect ensifentrine from competition because
different drugs with different active moieties can be approved for the same condition.
In addition, the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities can subsequently approve products with the same active
moiety for the same condition if the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities conclude that the later drug is clinically
superior on the basis of greater safety, greater effectiveness, or a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug
45
designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any
advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. In addition, while we intend to seek orphan drug designation
for ensifentrine for the treatment of CF, we may never receive such designation.
The successful commercialization of ensifentrine will depend in part on the extent to which governmental
authorities and health insurers establish adequate coverage, reimbursement levels and pricing policies for
ensifentrine. Failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement for ensifentrine, if approved,
could limit our ability to market ensifentrine and decrease our ability to generate revenue.
The availability and adequacy of coverage and reimbursement by governmental healthcare programs such as
Medicare and Medicaid, private health insurers and other third-party payors are essential for most patients to be able
to afford prescription medications such as ensifentrine, assuming approval. Our ability to achieve acceptable levels
of coverage and reimbursement by governmental authorities, private health insurers and other organizations will
have an effect on our ability to successfully commercialize ensifentrine. Assuming we obtain coverage for
ensifentrine by a third-party payor, the resulting reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require
co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. Moreover, for drugs and biologics administered under the
supervision of a physician, obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement may be particularly difficult because of
the higher prices often associated with such products. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement in the
United States, the EU or elsewhere will be available for ensifentrine or any product that we may develop, and any
reimbursement that may become available may be decreased or eliminated in the future.
Third-party payors increasingly are challenging prices charged for pharmaceutical products and services, and many
third-party payors may refuse to provide coverage and reimbursement for particular drugs when an equivalent
generic drug or a less expensive therapy is available. It is possible that a third-party payor may consider ensifentrine
as substitutable and only offer to reimburse patients for the less expensive product. Even if we show improved
efficacy or improved convenience of administration with ensifentrine, pricing of existing drugs may limit the
amount we will be able to charge for ensifentrine. These payors may deny or revoke the reimbursement status of a
given product or establish prices for new or existing marketed products at levels that are too low to enable us to
realize an appropriate return on our investment in ensifentrine. If reimbursement is not available or is available only
at limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize ensifentrine, and may not be able to obtain a
satisfactory financial return on ensifentrine.
There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In
the United States, third-party payors, including private and governmental payors, such as the Medicare and Medicaid
programs, play an important role in determining the extent to which new drugs and biologics will be covered. The
Medicare and Medicaid programs increasingly are used as models for how private payors and other governmental
payors develop their coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs and biologics. Some third-party payors may
require pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative devices or drug therapies before they will reimburse
healthcare providers who use such therapies. It is difficult to predict at this time what third-party payors will decide
with respect to the coverage and reimbursement for ensifentrine.
Obtaining and maintaining reimbursement status is time consuming and costly. No uniform policy for coverage and
reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors in the United States. Therefore, coverage and
reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. As a result, the coverage determination
process is often a time-consuming and costly process that will require us to provide scientific and clinical support for
the use of ensifentrine to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be
applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. Furthermore, rules and regulations regarding reimbursement
change frequently, in some cases at short notice, and we believe that changes in these rules and regulations are
likely. Specifically, we believe that Medicare Part B will play an important role in the reimbursement of
ensifentrine. Changes within how products are reimbursed through Medicare Part B could occur and those changes
may affect the overall coverage of ensifentrine in the future.
Outside the United States, international operations are generally subject to extensive governmental price controls
and other market regulations, and we believe the increasing emphasis on cost-containment initiatives in Europe and
other countries has and will continue to put pressure on the pricing and usage of ensifentrine. In many countries, the
prices of medical products are subject to varying price control mechanisms as part of national health systems. Other
countries allow companies to fix their own prices for medical products, but monitor and control company profits.
Additional foreign price controls or other changes in pricing regulation could restrict the amount that we are able to
charge for ensifentrine. Accordingly, in markets outside the United States, the reimbursement for ensifentrine may
be reduced compared with the United States and may be insufficient to generate commercially reasonable revenue
and profits.
46
Moreover, increasing efforts by governmental and third-party payors in the United States and abroad to cap or
reduce healthcare costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and the level of reimbursement for
newly approved products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for ensifentrine. We
expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of ensifentrine due to the trend toward managed
healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes. The
downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other
treatments, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new
products.
In addition, even if a pharmaceutical product obtains a marketing authorization in the European Union, there can be
no assurance that reimbursement for such product will be secured on a timely basis or at all.
Ensifentrine may not gain market acceptance, in which case our ability to generate product revenues will be
compromised.
Even if the FDA or any other regulatory authority approves the marketing of ensifentrine, whether developed on our
own or with a collaborator, physicians, healthcare providers, patients or the medical community may not accept or
use ensifentrine. If ensifentrine does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant
product revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of ensifentrine will depend on a
variety of factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the timing of market introduction;
the number and clinical profile of competing products;
the clinical indications for which ensifentrine is approved;
our ability to provide acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;
the prevalence and severity of any side effects;
relative convenience, frequency, and ease of administration;
cost effectiveness;
• marketing, sales, and distribution support;
•
•
availability of adequate coverage, reimbursement and adequate payment from health maintenance organizations
and other insurers, both public and private; and
other potential advantages over alternative treatment methods
If ensifentrine fails to gain market acceptance, this will adversely impact our ability to generate revenues. Even if
ensifentrine achieves market acceptance, the market may prove not to be large enough to allow us to generate
significant revenues.
We currently have no commercial infrastructure, including sales, marketing, operations, distribution, and
reimbursement infrastructure. If we are unable to develop commercial infrastructure, including sales, marketing,
operations, distribution and reimbursement capabilities on our own or through collaborations, we may not be
successful in commercializing ensifentrine.
We have no sales, marketing, or operations, distribution or reimbursement capabilities and we have not previously
marketed, sold or distributed pharmaceutical products. If ensifentrine is approved, we intend either to establish our
commercial infrastructure including sales, marketing, operations, distribution, and reimbursement with technical
expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize ensifentrine, or to outsource this function to a
third party. Either of these options would be expensive and time consuming. Some or all of these costs may be
incurred in advance of any approval of ensifentrine. In addition, we may not be able to hire a sales force that is
sufficient in size or has adequate expertise in the medical markets that we intend to target. Any failure or delay in the
development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the
commercialization of ensifentrine.
To the extent that we enter into collaboration agreements with respect to marketing, sales or distribution, our product
revenue may be lower than if we directly marketed or sold ensifentrine, if approved. In addition, any revenue we
receive will depend in whole or in part upon the efforts of these third-party collaborators, which may not be
successful and are generally not within our control. If we are unable to enter into these arrangements on acceptable
terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize ensifentrine. If we are not successful in
47
commercializing ensifentrine, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future
product revenue will suffer and we may incur significant additional losses.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties, including independent clinical investigators and CROs,
to conduct our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their
contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or
commercialize ensifentrine and our business could be substantially harmed.
We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators and
CROs, to conduct our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials and to monitor and manage data for our ongoing pre-
clinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials,
and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our
studies and trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific
standards, and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our
third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations and
guidelines enforced by the FDA, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all of our products in clinical
development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors,
principal investigators and trial sites. If we fail to exercise adequate oversight over any of our CROs or if we or any
of our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCP requirements, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may
be deemed unreliable and the FDA, the EMA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform
additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot provide assurance that upon a
regulatory inspection of us or our CROs or other third parties performing services in connection with our clinical
trials, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials complies with GCP regulations. In
addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under applicable cGMP regulations. Our
failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory
approval process.
Further, these investigators and CROs are not our employees and we will not be able to control, other than by
contract, the amount of resources, including time, which they devote to ensifentrine and clinical trials. If
independent investigators or CROs fail to devote sufficient resources to the development of ensifentrine, or if their
performance is substandard, it may delay or compromise the prospects for approval and commercialization of
ensifentrine. In addition, the use of third-party service providers requires us to disclose our proprietary information
to these parties, which could increase the risk that this information will be misappropriated.
Our existing and future CROs have or may have the right to terminate their agreements with us in the event of an
uncured material breach. In addition, some of our CROs have an ability to terminate their respective agreements
with us if it can be reasonably demonstrated that the safety of the subjects participating in our clinical trials warrants
such termination, if we make a general assignment for the benefit of our creditors or if we are liquidated.
If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements
with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding CROs involves additional
cost and requires management’s time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new CRO
commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired
clinical development timelines. In addition, if our CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or
obligations or meet expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised
due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials
may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize,
ensifentrine. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for ensifentrine would be harmed,
our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.
The collaboration and license agreement with Nuance Pharma is important to our business. If Nuance Pharma is
unable to develop and commercialize products containing ensifentrine in Greater China, if we or Nuance
Pharma fail to adequately perform under the Nuance Agreement, or if we or Nuance Pharma terminate the
Nuance Agreement, our business would be adversely affected.
We entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Nuance Pharma effective June 9, 2021 (the “Nuance
Agreement”) under which we granted Nuance Pharma the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize products
containing ensifentrine (the “Nuance Licensed Products”) in Greater China (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and
Macau).
48
The Nuance Agreement will continue on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction and product-by-product basis until the
expiration of royalty payment obligations with respect to such product in such jurisdiction unless earlier terminated
by the parties. Either party may terminate the Nuance Agreement for an uncured material breach or bankruptcy of
the other party. Nuance Pharma may also terminate the Nuance Agreement at will upon 90 days' prior written notice.
Termination of the Nuance Agreement could cause significant setbacks in our ability to develop and commercialize
the Nuance Licensed Products in Greater China. Any suitable alternative collaboration or license agreement would
take considerable time to negotiate and could also be on less favorable terms to us. In addition, under the Nuance
Agreement, Nuance Pharma agreed to assume all costs related to clinical development and commercialization of the
Nuance Licensed Products in Greater China. If the Nuance Agreement were to be terminated, and whether or not we
identify another suitable collaborator, we may need to seek additional financing to support the clinical development
and commercialization of the Nuance Licensed Products in Greater China, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Under the Nuance Agreement, we are dependent upon Nuance Pharma to successfully develop and commercialize
Nuance Licensed Products. Although we have formed a joint steering committee with Nuance Pharma to oversee
and coordinate the overall conduct of the clinical development and commercialization of the Nuance Licensed
Products in Greater China, we do not control all aspects of Nuance Pharma’s development and commercialization or
the resources it allocates to the development of the Nuance Licensed Products identified under the Nuance
Agreement. Our interests and Nuance Pharma’s interests may differ or conflict from time to time, or we may
disagree with Nuance Pharma’s level of effort or resource allocation. Nuance Pharma may internally prioritize
programs under development within the collaboration differently than we would, or it may not allocate sufficient
resources to effectively or optimally develop or commercialize the Nuance Licensed Products. If these events were
to occur, our ability to receive revenue from the commercialization of the Nuance Licensed Products would be
reduced, and our business would be adversely affected.
If we fail to enter into new strategic relationships for ensifentrine, our business, research and development and
commercialization prospects could be adversely affected.
Our development program for ensifentrine and the potential commercialization of ensifentrine will require
substantial additional cash to fund expenses. Therefore, we may decide to enter into collaborations with
pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies for the development and potential commercialization of
ensifentrine. For example, we may seek a collaborator for development of our DPI or pMDI formulation of
ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of COPD and potentially asthma and other respiratory diseases.
We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time
consuming to negotiate and document. We may also be restricted under existing and future collaboration agreements
from entering into agreements on certain terms with other potential collaborators. We may not be able to negotiate
collaborations on acceptable terms, or at all. If that were to occur, we may have to curtail the development of
ensifentrine, reduce or delay its development program, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of
our sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization
activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization
activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable
terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we will not be able to bring ensifentrine to market and generate
product revenue. If we do enter into a collaboration agreement, we could be subject to the following risks, among
others, any of which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize ensifentrine:
•
•
•
•
•
•
we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that the collaborator devotes to the
development of ensifentrine;
the collaborator may experience financial difficulties;
we may be required to relinquish important rights such as marketing, distribution and intellectual property
rights;
a collaborator could move forward with a competing product developed either independently or in collaboration
with third parties, including our competitors;
safety and/or efficacy data from a collaborator’s clinical development activities may conflict with our data and
could potentially impact our global clinical development activities;
a collaborator may unlawfully use or disclose confidential information and materials in breach of confidentiality
obligations to us;
49
•
•
•
•
business combinations or significant changes in a collaborator’s business strategy may adversely affect our
willingness to complete our obligations under any arrangement;
we or a collaborator could fail to adequately perform our obligations under the agreement and/or the agreement
could fall into dispute;
we may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce patents covering ensifentrine, or relating to the terms of
our collaborations, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful; or
the collaboration may not provide sufficient funds to be profitable for us after we fulfill our payment liabilities
under our agreement with Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Ligand, which acquired Vernalis Development
Limited, or Vernalis, in October 2018.
We currently rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers for production of the active pharmaceutical
ingredient ensifentrine and its derived formulated products. Our dependence on these third parties may impair
the advancement of our research and development programs and the development of ensifentrine. Moreover, we
intend to rely on third parties to produce commercial supplies of ensifentrine, if approved, and commercialization
could be stopped, delayed or made less profitable if those third parties fail to obtain the necessary approvals from
the FDA or comparable regulatory authorities, fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of product in a timely
manner or fail to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices or fail to otherwise complete their duties in
compliance with their obligations to us or other parties.
We have limited personnel with experience in manufacturing, and we do not own facilities for manufacturing
ensifentrine and its derived formulated products. Instead, we rely on and expect to continue to rely on third-party
contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs), for the supply of cGMP- or GMP-grade clinical trial materials and
commercial quantities of ensifentrine and its derived formulated products, if approved. While we may contract with
other CMOs in the future, we currently have one CMO for the manufacture of ensifentrine drug substance and one
CMO for each formulation of ensifentrine. The facilities used to manufacture ensifentrine and its derived formulated
products must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit an NDA to
the FDA, and by comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approvals outside the United States. While we
provide sponsor oversight of manufacturing activities, we do not and will not directly control the manufacturing
process of, and are or will be essentially dependent on, our CMOs for compliance with cGMP and similar foreign
requirements for the manufacture of ensifentrine and its derived formulated products. If a CMO cannot successfully
manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the regulatory requirements of the FDA or a
comparable foreign regulatory authority, it will not be able to secure or maintain regulatory approval for the
manufacture of ensifentrine and its derived formulated products in its manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have
little direct control over the ability of a CMO to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified
personnel. If the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority does not approve these facilities for the
manufacture of ensifentrine and its derived formulated products or if it withdraws any such approval in the future,
we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would delay our development program and
significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market ensifentrine and its derived
formulated products, if approved. In addition, any failure to achieve and maintain compliance with these laws,
regulations and standards could subject us to the risk that we may have to suspend the manufacture of ensifentrine
and its derived formulated products or that obtained approvals could be revoked. Furthermore, third-party providers
may breach existing agreements they have with us because of factors beyond our control. They may also terminate
or refuse to renew their agreement because of their own financial difficulties or business priorities, at a time that is
costly or otherwise inconvenient for us. If we were unable to find an adequate replacement or another acceptable
solution in time, our clinical trials could be delayed or our commercial activities could be harmed. In addition, the
fact that we are dependent on our suppliers, CMOs and other third parties for the manufacture, storage and
distribution of ensifentrine and its derived formulated products means that we are subject to the risk that ensifentrine
and its derived formulated products may have manufacturing defects that we have limited ability to prevent, detect
or control.
We rely on and will continue to rely on CMOs to purchase from third-party suppliers the materials necessary to
produce ensifentrine and its derived formulated products and the inhalation and nebulization devices to deliver
ensifentrine. We do not and will not have any direct control over the process or timing of the acquisition and
delivery of these supplies by any CMO or its third-party suppliers, or the quality or quantity of such supplies. These
supplies could be interrupted from time to time and, if interrupted, we cannot be certain that alternative supplies
could be obtained within a reasonable timeframe, at an acceptable cost or quality, or at all. There are a limited
number of suppliers for the raw materials that we may use to manufacture ensifentrine and for the drug delivery
devices (e.g. nebulizers) that we use for clinical trials with ensifentrine, and we will need to assess alternate
50
suppliers to prevent a possible disruption to our clinical trials, and if approved, ultimately to commercial sales.
Although we generally do not begin a clinical trial unless we believe we have on hand, or will be able to obtain, a
sufficient supply of ensifentrine to complete the clinical trial, any significant delay in the supply of ensifentrine drug
products, or the raw material components needed to produce, or devices needed to deliver, ensifentrine, for an
ongoing clinical trial due to our CMOs or their third-party suppliers could considerably delay completion of our
clinical trials, product testing and potential regulatory approval of ensifentrine. If our CMOs, their third-party
supplies, or we are unable to purchase these supplies after regulatory approval has been obtained for ensifentrine, the
commercial launch of ensifentrine would be delayed or there would be a shortage in supply, which would impair our
ability to generate revenues from the sale of ensifentrine. In addition, growth in the costs and expenses of these
supplies may impair our ability to cost-effectively manufacture ensifentrine. Additionally, CMOs are experiencing
labor constraints which could impact their ability to manufacture and deliver ensifentrine.
We rely and will continue to rely on CMOs and third-party suppliers to comply with and respect the proprietary
rights of others in conducting their contractual obligations for us. If a CMO or third-party suppliers fails to acquire
the proper licenses or otherwise infringes third-party proprietary rights in the course of providing services to us, we
may have to find alternative CMOs or third-party suppliers, or defend against claims of infringement, either of
which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for, or market ensifentrine and
any of its derived formulated products, if approved.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property and Information Technology
We rely on patents and other intellectual property rights to protect ensifentrine, the enforcement, defense and
maintenance of which may be challenging and costly. Failure to enforce or protect these rights adequately could
harm our ability to compete and impair our business.
Our commercial success depends in part on obtaining and maintaining patents and other forms of intellectual
property rights for ensifentrine, formulations of ensifentrine, polymorphs, salts and analogs of ensifentrine, methods
used to manufacture ensifentrine, methods for manufacturing of final drug product for different inhalation devices
such as nebulizer, DPI, pMDI, and the methods for treating patients with respiratory diseases using ensifentrine
alone or in combination with other available products, or on in-licensing such rights. Our ensifentrine development
program relies on the patents and patent applications assigned and know-how licensed from Ligand. The
registrations of the assignment of each of these patents and patent applications with the relevant authorities in certain
jurisdictions in which the patent and patent applications are registered have been granted, but there is no assurance
that any additional registrations will be effected in a timely manner or at all. Failure to protect or to obtain, maintain
or extend adequate patent and other intellectual property rights could adversely affect our ability to develop and
market ensifentrine.
The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we or our licensors, licensees or collaborators
may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in
a timely manner or in all jurisdictions. It is also possible that we or our licensors, licensees or collaborators will fail
to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities
before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. Moreover, depending on the terms of any future in-licenses
to which we may become a party, in some circumstances we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing
and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology in-licensed from third parties.
Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best
interests of our business. Further, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our and our
current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ patent rights are highly uncertain. Our and our licensors’
pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or
products, in whole or in part, or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies
and products. The patent examination process may require us or our licensors, licensees or collaborators to narrow
the scope of the claims of our or our licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ pending and future patent applications,
which may limit the scope of patent protection that may be obtained. We cannot provide assurance that all of the
potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found. If such prior art exists, it
can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do
successfully issue and even if such patents cover ensifentrine, third parties may initiate an opposition, interference,
re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, nullification or derivation action in court or before patent
offices, or similar proceedings challenging the validity, enforceability or scope of such patents, which may result in
the patent claims being narrowed or invalidated. Our and our licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ patent
applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology claimed in such applications unless
and until a patent issues from such applications, and then only to the extent the issued claims cover the technology.
51
Because patent applications are confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued, we
cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the first to file any patent application related to ensifentrine.
Furthermore, if third parties have filed such patent applications on or before March 15, 2013, the date on which the
U.S. patent filing system changed from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file standard, an interference proceeding can be
initiated by such third parties to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent
claims of our applications. If third parties have filed such applications after March 15, 2013, a derivation proceeding
can be initiated by such third parties to determine whether our invention was derived from theirs. Even where we
have a valid and enforceable patent, we may not be able to exclude others from practicing our invention where the
other party can show that they used the invention in commerce before our filing date or the other party benefits from
a compulsory license.
We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of
a third-party patent which might adversely affect our ability to develop, manufacture and market ensifentrine.
We cannot guarantee that any of our or our licensors’ patent searches or analyses, including but not limited to the
identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or
thorough, nor can we be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in
the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of ensifentrine in any
jurisdiction. For example, U.S. applications filed before November 29, 2000 and certain U.S. applications filed after
that date that will not be filed outside the United States remain confidential until patents issue. Patent applications in
the United States and elsewhere are published approximately 18 months after the earliest filing for which priority is
claimed, with such earliest filing date being commonly referred to as the priority date. Therefore, patent applications
covering ensifentrine could have been filed by others without our knowledge. Additionally, pending patent
applications that have been published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could
cover ensifentrine or the use of ensifentrine. The scope of a patent claim is determined by an interpretation of the
law, the written disclosure in a patent and the patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of the relevance or the
scope of a patent or a pending application may be incorrect, which may negatively impact our ability to market
ensifentrine. We may incorrectly determine that ensifentrine is not covered by a third-party patent or may incorrectly
predict whether a third party’s pending application will issue with claims of relevant scope. Our determination of the
expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect, which may
negatively impact our ability to develop and market ensifentrine. Our failure to identify and correctly interpret
relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to develop and market ensifentrine.
If we fail to identify and correctly interpret relevant patents, we may be subject to infringement claims. We cannot
guarantee that we will be able to successfully settle or otherwise resolve such infringement claims. If we fail in any
such dispute, in addition to being forced to pay damages, we may be temporarily or permanently prohibited from
commercializing ensifentrine. We might, if possible, also be forced to redesign ensifentrine so that we no longer
infringe the third-party intellectual property rights. Any of these events, even if we were ultimately to prevail, could
require us to divert substantial financial and management resources that we would otherwise be able to devote to our
business.
We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce patents covering ensifentrine, which could be expensive,
time consuming and unsuccessful, and issued patents could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in
court.
To protect our competitive position, we may from time to time need to resort to litigation in order to enforce or
defend any patents or other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to us, or to determine or challenge the
scope or validity of patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. As enforcement of intellectual
property rights is difficult, unpredictable, time consuming and expensive, we may fail in enforcing our rights — in
which case our competitors may be permitted to use our technology without being required to pay us any license
fees. In addition, however, litigation involving our patents carries the risk that one or more of our patents will be
held invalid (in whole or in part, on a claim-by-claim basis) or held unenforceable. Such an adverse court ruling
could allow third parties to commercialize ensifentrine, and then compete directly with us, without payment to us. If
we in-license intellectual property rights, our agreements may give our licensors the first right to control claims of
third-party infringement, or to defend validity challenges. Therefore, these patents and patent applications may not
be enforced or defended in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.
If we were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our products, the
defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States or
in Europe, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity
challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, for example, lack of novelty,
52
obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone
connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office,
or USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. The outcome following legal assertions of
invalidity and unenforceability during patent litigation is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for
example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art of which we and the patent examiner were
unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we
would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on ensifentrine. Patents and other intellectual
property rights also will not protect our technology if competitors design around our protected technology without
infringing our patents or other intellectual property rights.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property
litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this
type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim
proceedings or developments. If securities analysts, industry commentators or investors perceive these results to be
negative, it could have an adverse effect on the price of our ADSs.
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the
outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a negative impact on the success of our business.
Our commercial success depends, in part, upon our ability, and the ability of our future collaborators, to develop,
manufacture, market and sell our product candidates without alleged or actual infringement, misappropriation or
other violation of the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. There have been many lawsuits and other
proceedings involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries, including patent infringement lawsuits, interferences, oppositions and reexamination proceedings before
the USPTO and corresponding foreign patent offices. The various markets in which we plan to operate are subject to
frequent and extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. In addition, many
companies in intellectual property-dependent industries, including the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical
industries, have employed intellectual property litigation as a means to gain an advantage over their competitors.
Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist
in the fields in which we are developing ensifentrine. Some claimants may have substantially greater resources than
we do and may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for
longer periods of time than we could. In addition, patent holding companies that focus solely on extracting royalties
and settlements by enforcing patent rights may target us. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand
and more patents are issued, the risk increases that ensifentrine may be subject to claims of infringement of the
intellectual property rights of third parties.
We may in the future become party to, or be threatened with, adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding
intellectual property rights with respect to ensifentrine and any future product candidates, including interference or
derivation proceedings, post grant review and inter partes review before the USPTO or similar adversarial
proceedings or litigation in other jurisdictions. Similarly, we or our licensors or collaborators may initiate such
proceedings or litigation against third parties, for example, to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property
rights controlled by third parties. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents
or patents that may be granted in the future, regardless of their merit. There is a risk that third parties may choose to
engage in litigation with us to enforce or to otherwise assert their patent rights against us. Even if we believe such
claims are without merit, a court of competent jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid,
enforceable and infringed, and the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to commercialize
such product candidate unless we obtained a license under the applicable patents, or until such patents expire or are
finally determined to be invalid or unenforceable. Similarly, if any third-party patents were held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to cover aspects of our compositions, formulations, or methods of treatment, prevention or
use, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to develop and commercialize the applicable
product candidate unless we obtained a license or until such patent expires or is finally determined to be invalid or
unenforceable. Such licenses may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, or may be non-exclusive thereby
giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us.
If we fail in any such dispute, we may be forced to pay damages, including the possibility of treble damages in a
patent case if a court finds us to have willfully infringed certain intellectual property rights. We or our licensees may
be temporarily or permanently prohibited from commercializing ensifentrine or from selling, incorporating,
manufacturing or using our products in the United States and/or other jurisdictions that use the subject intellectual
property. We might, if possible, also be forced to redesign ensifentrine so that we no longer infringe the third-party
intellectual property rights, which may result in significant cost or delay to us, or which redesign could be
53
technically infeasible. Any of these events, even if we were ultimately to prevail, could require us to divert
substantial financial and management resources that we would otherwise be able to devote to our business.
In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our or our licensors’ or collaborators’ patents and
patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or
commercialize current or future product candidates.
We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship of our patents and other intellectual property.
Although we are not currently experiencing any claims challenging the inventorship of our patents or ownership of
our intellectual property, we may in the future be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other
third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. While it is our
policy to require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of
intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in
executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard
as our own. For example, the assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing or the assignment
agreements may be breached, or we may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of consultants
or others who are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against
these and other claims challenging inventorship. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying
monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use,
valuable intellectual property. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in
substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from
their normal responsibilities.
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause
us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal
responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim
proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, such
perceptions could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our ADSs. Such litigation or proceedings could
substantially increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development activities. We may
not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our
competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because
of their substantially greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent
litigation or other proceedings could have an adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.
If we fail to comply with our obligations under our existing and any future intellectual property licenses with
third parties, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.
We are party to a license agreement with Ligand, under which we in-license certain intellectual property and were
assigned certain patents and patent applications related to our business. We may enter into additional license
agreements in the future. We expect that any future license agreements would impose various diligence, milestone
payment, royalty, insurance and other obligations on us. Any uncured, material breach under these license
agreements could result in our loss of rights to practice the patent rights and other intellectual property licensed to us
under these agreements, and could compromise our development and commercialization efforts for ensifentrine or
any future product candidates. Under our agreement with Ligand, we may not abandon any of the assigned patents
or allow any of the assigned patents to lapse without consent from Ligand, which is not to be unreasonably delayed
or withheld. If we do not obtain such consent in a timely manner or at all and such assigned patent rights lapse or are
abandoned, our agreement with Ligand may be terminated in its entirety. For example, if we decide for commercial
reasons to let an assigned patent lapse in a country of little commercial importance, but Ligand does not provide
consent and such patent rights lapse, we may lose all intellectual property rights covering ensifentrine in multiple
markets. Moreover, our future licensors may own or control intellectual property that has not been licensed to us
and, as a result, we may be subject to claims, regardless of their merit, that we are infringing or otherwise violating
the licensor’s rights.
We may not be successful in maintaining the necessary rights to ensifentrine or obtaining other intellectual
property rights important to our business through acquisitions and in-licenses.
We currently own and have in-licensed rights to intellectual property, including patents, patent applications and
know-how, relating to ensifentrine, and our success will likely depend on maintaining these rights. Because our
programs may require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business will likely
depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license, maintain or use these proprietary rights. In addition, ensifentrine
54
may require specific formulations to work effectively and the rights to these formulations may be held by others. We
may be unable to acquire or in-license any compositions, methods of use, processes, or other third-party intellectual
property rights that we identify as necessary for ensifentrine. The licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual
property rights is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies also are pursuing strategies to
license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive. These established
companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical
development and commercialization capabilities.
In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We
may also be unable to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights on a timely basis, on terms that
would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment, or at all. Even if we are able to obtain a license to
intellectual property of interest, we may not be able to secure exclusive rights, in which case others could use the
same rights and compete with us. If we are unable to successfully obtain a license to third-party intellectual property
rights necessary for the development of ensifentrine or a development program on acceptable terms, we may have to
abandon development of ensifentrine or that development program.
If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name
recognition in our markets of interest and our competitive position may be adversely affected.
We do not currently own any registered trademarks. We may not be able to obtain trademark protection in territories
that we consider of significant importance to us. If we register trademarks, our trademark applications may be
rejected during trademark registration proceedings. Although we will be given an opportunity to respond to those
rejections, we may be unable to overcome such rejections. In addition, any of our trademarks or trade names,
whether registered or unregistered, may be challenged, opposed, infringed, cancelled, circumvented or declared
generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks
and trade names, which we need to build name recognition by potential collaborators or customers in our markets of
interest. Over the long-term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade
names, then we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. If other entities
use trademarks similar to ours in different jurisdictions, or have senior rights to ours, it could interfere with our use
of our current trademarks throughout the world.
If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and similar non-U.S. legislation for
extending the term of patents covering ensifentrine and any other product candidates, our ability to compete
effectively could be impaired.
Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of
a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. The issued patents covering the
composition of matter for ensifentrine expired in 2020, and our other issued patents will expire in 2031 to 2041,
subject to any patent extensions that may be available for such patents. If patents are issued on our pending patent
applications, the resulting patents are projected to expire on dates ranging from 2031 to 2036. Various extensions
may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents covering
ensifentrine are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from
competitive medications, including generic medications. Given the amount of time required for the development,
testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or
shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not
provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
Depending upon the timing, duration and conditions of the FDA marketing approval of ensifentrine, one or more of
our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent
Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments, and similar legislation in the EU.
The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent covering an
approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA
regulatory review process. However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable
deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements.
Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension
or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we can enforce our patent rights
for that product will be shortened and our competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner. As
a result, our revenue from applicable products could be reduced, possibly materially.
We enjoy only limited geographical protection with respect to certain patents and may face difficulties in certain
jurisdictions, which may diminish the value of our intellectual property rights in those jurisdictions.
55
We generally file our first patent application, or priority filing, at the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office.
International applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, are usually filed within 12 months after the
priority filing. Based on the PCT filing, national and regional patent applications may be filed in additional
jurisdictions where we believe a product candidate may be marketed or manufactured. We have so far not filed for
patent protection for ensifentrine in all national and regional jurisdictions where such protection may be available.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive,
and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in
the United States. In addition, we may decide to abandon national and regional patent applications before grant. The
grant proceeding of each national or regional patent is an independent proceeding which may lead to situations in
which applications might in some jurisdictions be refused by the relevant patent offices, while granted by others. For
example, unlike other countries, China has a heightened requirement for patentability, and specifically requires a
detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. Furthermore, generic drug manufacturers or other
competitors may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of our or our licensors’ patents, requiring us or our
licensors to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation or other proceedings. Generic drug manufacturers may
develop, seek approval for and launch generic versions of our products. It is also quite common that depending on
the country, the scope of patent protection may vary for the same product candidate or technology.
Competitors may use our or our licensors’ or collaborators’ technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained
patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories
where we or our licensors or collaborators have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the
United States. These products may compete with our product candidates, and our and our licensors’ or collaborators’
patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.
The laws of some jurisdictions do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws or rules and
regulations in the United States and the EU, and many companies have encountered significant difficulties in
protecting and defending such rights in such jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain
developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property
protection, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing
products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign
jurisdictions, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from
other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our
patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not
prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially
meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate
to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license. Furthermore,
while we intend to protect our intellectual property rights in our expected significant markets, we cannot ensure that
we will be able to initiate or maintain similar efforts in all jurisdictions in which we may wish to market our product
candidates. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate,
which may have an adverse effect on our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates in all of our
expected significant foreign markets. If we or our licensors encounter difficulties in protecting, or are otherwise
precluded from effectively protecting, the intellectual property rights important for our business in such
jurisdictions, the value of these rights may be diminished and we may face additional competition from others in
those jurisdictions.
Some countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to
third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or
government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially
diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors is forced to grant a license to third parties with
respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired.
Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.
The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property
rights have limitations, and may not adequately protect our business, or permit us to maintain our competitive
advantage. The following examples are illustrative:
•
•
Others may be able to make compounds that are the same as or similar to our product candidates but that are not
covered by the claims of the patents that we own or have exclusively licensed;
The patents of third parties may impair our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates.
56
• We or our licensors or any future strategic collaborators might not have been the first to conceive or reduce to
practice the inventions covered by the issued patent or pending patent application that we own or have
exclusively licensed.
• We or our licensors or any future collaborators might not have been the first to file patent applications covering
certain of our inventions.
•
•
•
•
•
Others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies
without infringing our intellectual property rights.
It is possible that our pending patent applications will not lead to issued patents.
Issued patents that we own or have exclusively licensed may not provide us with any competitive advantage, or
may be held invalid or unenforceable, as a result of legal challenges by our competitors.
Our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent
rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our
major commercial markets.
Third parties performing manufacturing or testing for us using our product candidates or technologies could use
the intellectual property of others without obtaining a proper license.
• We may not develop additional technologies that are patentable.
Changes in patent laws or patent jurisprudence could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing
our ability to protect ensifentrine or any future product candidates.
As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property,
particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biopharmaceutical industry involve both technological
complexity and legal complexity. Therefore, obtaining and enforcing biopharmaceutical patents is costly, time
consuming and inherently uncertain. In addition, the America Invents Act, or the AIA, which was passed on
September 16, 2011, resulted in significant changes to the U.S. patent system.
An important change introduced by the AIA is that, as of March 16, 2013, the United States transitioned to a “first-
to-file” system for deciding which party should be granted a patent when two or more patent applications are filed
by different parties claiming the same invention. A third party that files a patent application in the USPTO, after that
date but before us could therefore be awarded a patent covering an invention of ours even if we had made the
invention before it was made by the third party. This requires us to be cognizant of the time from invention to filing
of a patent application, but circumstances could prevent us from promptly filing patent applications on our
inventions.
Among some of the other changes introduced by the AIA are changes that limit where a patentee may file a patent
infringement suit and providing opportunities for third parties to challenge any issued patent in the USPTO. This
applies to all of our U.S. patents, even those issued before March 16, 2013. Because of a lower evidentiary standard
in USPTO proceedings compared to the evidentiary standard in U.S. federal courts necessary to invalidate a patent
claim, a third party could potentially provide evidence in a USPTO proceeding sufficient for the USPTO to hold a
claim invalid even though the same evidence would be insufficient to invalidate the claim if first presented in a
district court action.
Accordingly, a third party may attempt to use the USPTO procedures to invalidate our patent claims that would not
have been invalidated if first challenged by the third party as a defendant in a district court action. It is not clear
what, if any, impact the AIA will have on the operation of our business. However, the AIA and its implementation
could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our or our licensors’ or collaboration
partners’ patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our or our licensors’ or collaboration partners’ issued
patents.
Additionally, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years either narrowing the scope of
patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In
addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events
has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by Congress, the
federal courts and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that
could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in
the future. Similarly, the complexity and uncertainty of European patent laws has also increased in recent years. In
addition, the European patent system is relatively stringent in the type of amendments that are allowed during
57
prosecution. Complying with these laws and regulations could limit our ability to obtain new patents in the future
that may be important for our business.
Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and
protect other proprietary information.
We consider proprietary trade secrets and confidential know-how and unpatented know-how to be important to our
business. We may rely on trade secrets or confidential know-how to protect our technology, especially where patent
protection is believed to be of limited value. However, trade secrets and confidential know-how are difficult to
maintain as confidential.
To protect this type of information against disclosure or appropriation by competitors, our policy is to require our
employees, consultants, contractors and advisors to enter into confidentiality agreements with us. We also seek to
preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data, trade secrets and know-how by maintaining physical security
of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. Monitoring
unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our
proprietary technologies will be effective. We cannot guarantee that our trade secrets and other proprietary and
confidential information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets.
However, current or former employees, consultants, contractors and advisors may unintentionally or willfully
disclose our confidential information to competitors, and confidentiality agreements may not provide an adequate
remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Enforcing a claim that a third party
obtained illegally and is using trade secrets and/or confidential know-how is expensive, time consuming and
unpredictable. The enforceability of confidentiality agreements may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Furthermore, if a competitor lawfully obtained or independently developed any of our trade secrets, we would have
no right to prevent such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with us, which could harm
our competitive position. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate, we
may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating the trade secret.
Failure to obtain or maintain trade secrets and confidential know-how trade protection could adversely affect our
competitive position. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary
information and may even apply for patent protection in respect of the same. If successful in obtaining such patent
protection, our competitors could limit our use of our trade secrets and/or confidential know-how.
We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated their
intellectual property, or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
Many of our employees, including our senior management, were previously employed at universities or at other
biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees
executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous
employment. Although we try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know-how of
others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed
confidential information or intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such
employee’s former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims.
If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose
valuable intellectual property rights or personnel or sustain damages. Such intellectual property rights could be
awarded to a third party, and we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to commercialize our
technology or products. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we
successfully prosecute or defend against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and distract
management.
Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document
submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent
protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance and annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent
agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent
agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions
during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late
fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result
in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in
the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent
application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and
58
failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our licensors or collaboration partners fail to
maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates, our competitors might be able to enter
the market, which would hurt our competitive position and could impair our ability to successfully commercialize
any product candidate.
Our information technology systems, and those of our manufacturers, suppliers and other third parties that we
use to conduct our pre-clinical and clinical trials or otherwise collaborate with, may fail or suffer security
breaches, which could distract our operations and cause delays in our research and development work, and may
adversely affect our business, operations and financial performance.
In the ordinary course of our business, we and our manufacturers, suppliers and third parties that we use to conduct
our pre-clinical and clinical trials or otherwise collaborate with, collect and store sensitive data, including
intellectual property, clinical trial data, proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of
our clinical trial subjects and employees, in our and third-party data centers and on our and third-party networks.
The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations. Our
information technology and other internal infrastructure systems, including corporate firewalls, servers, leased lines
and connection to the Internet, and that of our manufacturers, suppliers and other third parties that we use to conduct
our pre-clinical and clinical trials or otherwise collaborate with, face the risk of systemic failure that could disrupt
our operations. A significant disruption in the availability of these information technology and other internal
infrastructure systems could cause interruptions in our collaborations and delays in our research and development
work.Further, our information technology systems and those of our third-party service providers, strategic partners
and other contractors or consultants are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, ransomware
attacks, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, hacking, cyberattacks, phishing
attacks and other social engineering schemes, malicious code, employee theft or misuse, human error, fraud, denial
or degradation of service attacks, sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors or unauthorized access
or use by persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. Attacks upon
information technology systems are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity,
and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and
expertise. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we may also face increased cybersecurity risks due to our reliance
on internet technology and the number of our employees who are working remotely, which may create additional
opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities. Furthermore, because the techniques used to obtain
unauthorized access to, or to sabotage or disrupt, systems change frequently and often are not recognized until
launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative
measures. We may also experience security breaches that may remain undetected for an extended period. Despite
security measures that we and our critical third parties (e.g., collaborators) implement, our information technology
and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or internal bad actors, breaches due to human error,
technical vulnerabilities, malfeasance or other disruptions. Although to our knowledge we have not experienced any
such material security breach to date, any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored
there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information
could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal data, regulatory
penalties, disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and cause a loss of confidence in us and our ability to
conduct clinical trials, which could adversely affect our reputation and delay clinical development of our product
candidates. Any losses, costs or liabilities may not be covered by, or may exceed the coverage limits of, any or all
applicable insurance policies.
Risks Related to Employee Matters and Managing Growth
Our future growth and ability to compete depends on our ability to retain our key personnel and recruit
additional qualified personnel.
Our success depends upon the contributions of our key management, scientific and technical personnel, many of
whom have been instrumental for us and have substantial experience with ensifentrine and related technologies. Our
key management individuals include our chief executive officer, David Zaccardelli, our chief financial officer, Mark
Hahn, our general counsel, Claire Poll, our chief medical officer, Kathleen Rickard, our senior vice president,
chemistry manufacturing and controls, Peter Spargo, our senior vice president, regulatory affairs, Caroline Diaz, our
senior vice president of commercial, Christopher Martin, and our senior vice president, R&D, Tara Rheault. The loss
of key managers and senior scientists could delay our research and development activities. In addition, the
competition for qualified personnel in the biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical field is intense, and our future
success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled scientific, technical and managerial
employees. We face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research
59
institutions and other organizations. If our recruitment and retention efforts are unsuccessful in the future, it may be
difficult for us to achieve our product candidate development objectives, raise additional capital and implement our
business strategy.
We expect to expand our development, regulatory and sales and marketing capabilities, and as a result, we may
encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations,
particularly in the areas of drug development, regulatory affairs and sales and marketing. To manage our anticipated
future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems,
expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial
resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth,
we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified
personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and
business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or
disrupt our operations.
Risks Related to Our ADSs
Certain of our shareholders, members of our board of directors, and senior management own a majority of our
ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs) and as a result, are be able to exercise
significant control over us.
As of December 31, 2021, our senior management, board of directors and greater than 5% shareholders and their
respective affiliates, in the aggregate, owned approximately 45% of our outstanding voting ordinary shares
(including ordinary shares represented by ADSs) assuming no exercise of outstanding options or warrants.
Depending on the level of attendance at our general meetings of shareholders, these shareholders either alone or
voting together as a group may be in a position to determine or significantly influence the outcome of decisions
taken at any such general meeting. Any shareholder or group of shareholders controlling more than 50% of the share
capital present and voting at our general meetings of shareholders may control any shareholder resolution requiring a
simple majority, including the appointment of board members, certain decisions relating to our capital structure, and
the approval of certain significant corporate transactions. Among other consequences, this concentration of
ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might therefore negatively affect
the market price of our ADSs and ordinary shares.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our ADSs or ordinary shares in the foreseeable
future, capital appreciation, if any, will be our ADS holders’ and shareholders’ sole source of gains and they may
never receive a return on their investment.
Under current English law, a company’s accumulated realized profits must exceed its accumulated realized losses
(on a non-consolidated basis) before dividends can be paid. Therefore, we must have distributable profits before
issuing a dividend. We have not paid dividends in the past on our ordinary shares. We intend to retain earnings, if
any, for use in our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result,
capital appreciation, if any, on our ADSs or ordinary shares will be our ADS holders’ and shareholders’ sole source
of gain for the foreseeable future, and they will suffer a loss on their investment if they are unable to sell their ADSs
or ordinary shares at or above the price at which they were purchased. Investors seeking cash dividends should not
purchase our ADSs or ordinary shares.
Holders of our ADSs may not have the same voting rights as the holders of our ordinary shares and may not
receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise their right to vote.
Holders of our ADSs are not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares evidenced by our
ADSs on an individual basis. Holders of our ADSs have appointed a depositary as their representative to exercise
the voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares represented by their ADSs. Holders of our ADSs may not receive
voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote, and it is possible that they,or persons who hold their ADSs
through brokers, dealers or other third parties, will not have the opportunity to exercise a right to vote. Furthermore,
the depositary will not be liable for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any
vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, holders of our ADSs may not be able to exercise voting
rights and may lack recourse if their ADSs are not voted as requested. In addition, holders of our ADSs will not be
able to call a shareholders’ meeting.
60
Holders of our ADSs may not receive distributions on our ordinary shares represented by our ADSs or any value
for them if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to them.
The depositary for our ADSs has agreed to pay to holders of our ADSs the cash dividends or other distributions it or
the custodian receives on our ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses.
Holders of our ADSs will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of our ordinary shares their ADSs
represent. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement entered into with the
depositary, it may be unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to holders of our ADSs. We have no
obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of our ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to
holders of our ADSs. This means that holders of our ADSs may not receive the distributions we make on our
ordinary shares or any value from them if it is unlawful or impractical to make the distributions available to them.
These restrictions may have a material adverse effect on the value of our ADSs.
Holders of our ADSs may be subject to limitations on transfer of their ADSs.
ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any
time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the
depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the
depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deems it advisable to do so because of any requirement
of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any
other reason in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement. These limitations on transfer may have a
material adverse effect on the value of our ADSs.
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights typically offered to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
We are incorporated under English law. The rights of holders of ordinary shares and, therefore, certain of the rights
of holders of ADSs, are governed by English law, including the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, and by our
Articles of Association. These rights differ in certain material respects from the rights of shareholders in typical U.S.
corporations. As a result, investors in our ordinary shares or ADSs may not have the same protections or rights as
they would if they had invested in a U.S. corporation. This may make our ADSs less attractive to such investors,
which could harm the value of our ADSs.
Claims of U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us.
We are incorporated under English law. Substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. The
majority of our senior management and board of directors reside outside the United States. As a result, it may not be
possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce judgments
obtained in U.S. courts against them or us, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
U.S. federal securities laws.
The United States and the United Kingdom do not currently have a treaty providing for recognition and enforcement
of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Consequently, a final judgment for
payment given by a court in the United States, whether or not predicated solely upon U.S. securities laws, would not
automatically be recognized or enforceable in the United Kingdom. In addition, uncertainty exists as to whether
U.K. courts would entertain original actions brought in the United Kingdom against us or our directors or senior
management predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Any final and
conclusive monetary judgment for a definite sum obtained against us in U.S. courts would be treated by the courts of
the United Kingdom as a cause of action in itself and sued upon as a debt at common law so that no retrial of the
issues would be necessary, provided that certain requirements are met. Whether these requirements are met in
respect of a judgment based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws, including whether the
award of monetary damages under such laws would constitute a penalty, is an issue for the court making such
decision. If an English court gives judgment for the sum payable under a U.S. judgment, the English judgment will
be enforceable by methods generally available for this purpose. These methods generally permit the English court
discretion to prescribe the manner of enforcement.
As a result, U.S. investors may not be able to enforce against us or our senior management, board of directors or
certain experts named herein who are residents of the United Kingdom or countries other than the United States any
judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the U.S. federal
securities laws.
As of January 1, 2021, we were no longer a foreign private issuer and we are required to comply with the
provisions of the Exchange Act, and the rules of Nasdaq, applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which will continue
to require us to incur significant expenses and expend time and resources.
61
As of January 1, 2021, we were no longer a foreign private issuer, and we are required to comply with all of the
provisions applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer under the Exchange Act, including filing an annual report on Form
10-K, quarterly periodic reports and current reports for certain events, complying with the sections of the Exchange
Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership and trading
activities and insiders being liable for profit from trades made in a short period of time. We are also no longer
exempt from the requirements of Regulation FD promulgated under the Exchange Act related to selective
disclosures. We are also no longer permitted to follow our home country’s rules in lieu of the corporate governance
obligations imposed by Nasdaq, and are required to comply with the governance practices required by U.S. domestic
issuers listed on Nasdaq. We are also required to comply with all other rules of Nasdaq applicable to U.S. domestic
issuers, including that our articles of association specify a quorum of no less than one-third of our outstanding voting
common shares for meetings of our common shareholders, the solicitation of proxies and the approval by our
shareholders in connection with certain events such as the acquisition of stock or assets of another company, the
establishment of or amendments to equity-based compensation plans for employees, a change of control and certain
private placements. In addition, we are required to report our financial results under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, including our historical financial results, which have previously been prepared in accordance
with IFRS. The regulatory and compliance costs associated with the reporting and governance requirements
applicable to U.S. domestic issuers may be significantly higher than the costs we previously incurred as a foreign
private issuer.
The regulatory and compliance costs associated with the reporting and governance requirements applicable to U.S.
domestic issuers may be significantly higher than the costs we previously incurred as a foreign private issuer. We
expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses and to expend greater time
and resources to comply with these requirements. In addition, we may need to develop our reporting and compliance
infrastructure and may face challenges in complying with the new requirements applicable to us.
We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements
applicable to “emerging growth companies” will make our ADSs less attractive to investors.
For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, or EGC, we may take advantage of exemptions from
various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not EGCs, including not being
required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404, not being required to present selected
financial data for any period prior to the earliest audited period presented in our first registration statement, and
exemptions from the requirement of holding a shareholder nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and
golden parachute payments and from having to disclose the ratio of compensation of our chief executive officer to
the median compensation of our employee. We may take advantage of these exemptions until we are no longer an
EGC. We could be an EGC for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier,
including if the aggregate market value of our ADSs and ordinary shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million
as of any June 30 (the end of our second fiscal quarter), in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth
company as of the following December 31 (our fiscal year-end). We cannot predict if investors will find our ADSs
less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our ADSs less attractive as a result,
there may be a less active trading market for our ADSs and the price of our ADSs may be more volatile.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to
accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our
financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our ADSs.
Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and,
together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement
required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet
our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404, or any subsequent
testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over
financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes
to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inadequate internal controls
could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative
effect on the trading price of our ADSs.
Management will be required to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls annually. However, for as long as
we are an EGC, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness
of our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. An independent assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal controls could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not.
Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements requiring us
62
to incur the expense of remediation and could also result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss
of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
We may have inadvertently violated Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act (implementing Section 402 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and may be subject to sanctions as a result.
Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act provides that it is unlawful for a company, such as ours, that has a class of
securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to, directly or indirectly, including through any
subsidiary, extend or maintain credit in the form of a personal loan to or for any director or executive officer of the
company. In August 2018, a receivable arose with respect to taxes due upon the vesting of restricted share units held
by one of our directors and two of our executive officers, which may have violated Section 13(k) of the Exchange
Act. The receivable was repaid, with interest, in March 2019, as soon as management became aware of the possible
violation. Issuers that are found to have violated Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act may be subject to civil
sanctions, including injunctive remedies and monetary penalties, as well as criminal sanctions. The imposition of
any of such sanctions on us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Changes in our tax rates, unavailability of certain tax credits or reliefs or exposure to additional tax liabilities or
assessments could affect our profitability, and audits by tax authorities could result in additional tax payments for
prior periods.
We carry out research and development activities including, but not limited to, developing ensifentrine for various
indications and delivery methods, and as a result we benefit in the U.K. from the HM Revenue and Customs, or
HMRC, small and medium sized enterprises research and development relief, or SME R&D Relief, which provides
relief against U.K. Corporation Tax.
Broadly, SME R&D Relief comprises two elements, (a) allowing qualifying SMEs to deduct a total of 230% (an
additional 130% deduction plus the usual 100% deduction) of their qualifying expenditure from their yearly profit
for U.K. Corporation Tax purposes, or the SME R&D Additional Deduction and, (b) where there are not sufficient
profits for U.K. Corporation Tax purposes to fully utilize the SME R&D Additional Deduction, the excess
(“surrenderable losses”) can be carried forward to offset against future taxable profits, or a tax credit currently equal
to 14.5% of such surrenderable loss can be claimed in cash, or the SME R&D Tax Credit.
Based on criteria established by HMRC a portion of expenditure incurred in relation to our research and
development activities including, but not limited to, operating clinical trials, manufacturing, consultant and salary
and related costs, is eligible for the SME R&D Additional Deduction. Our consequential surrenderable losses are
currently eligible for the SME R&D Tax Credit, in accordance with HMRC criteria.
In the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded an SME R&D Tax Credit of $8.3
million which was subsequently received in cash in the year ended December 31, 2021. For the year ended
December 31, 2021, we recorded an SME R&D Tax Credit of $15.6 million, which we expect to receive in the year
ending December 31, 2022.
New rules were introduced, effective for accounting periods starting after April 1, 2021, whereby the amount of
SME payable R&D tax credit that a business can receive in any one year will be capped at £20,000 plus three times
the company’s total Pay As You Earn (“PAYE”) and National Insurance contributions (“NIC”) liability. Exemptions
to the cap have been introduced which are available to companies that meet certain conditions. We are currently
reviewing the impact these changes could have on our tax credit for the year ending December 31, 2022, which
would be payable in 2023.
63
Taxation
We believe we will likely be classified as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax
purposes for the taxable year ended December 31, 2021, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences to U.S. investors in our ADSs.
Because we do not earn revenue from our business operations, and because our sole source of income currently is
interest on bank accounts held by us, we believe we will likely be classified as a “passive foreign investment
company,” or PFIC, for the taxable year ended December 31, 2021. A non-U.S. company will be considered a PFIC
for any taxable year if (i) at least 75% of its gross income is passive income (including interest income), or (ii) at
least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets during a taxable year) is
attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. If we are classified as a PFIC in
any year with respect to which a U.S. Holder (as defined below) owns our ordinary shares or ADSs, we will
continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder in all succeeding years during which the U.S.
Holder owns our ordinary shares or ADSs, regardless of whether we continue to meet the PFIC test described above,
unless the U.S. Holder makes a specified election once we cease to be a PFIC. If we are classified as a PFIC for any
taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ordinary shares or ADSs, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax
consequences could apply to such U.S. Holder, including (i) the treatment of all or a portion of any gain on
disposition as ordinary income, (ii) the application of a deferred interest charge on such gain and the receipt of
certain dividends and (iii) the obligation to comply with certain reporting requirements. A “U.S. Holder” is a holder
who, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares or ADSs who is a citizen or
individual resident of the United States, a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized
in or under the laws of the United States, any state therein or the District of Columbia; or an estate or trust the
income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source.
If a U.S. Holder is treated as owning at least 10% of our ordinary shares or ADSs, such holder may be subject to
adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
If a U.S. Holder (as defined above) is treated as owning, directly, indirectly or constructively, at least 10% of the
value or voting power of our ordinary shares or ADSs, such U.S. Holder may be treated as a “United States
shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” or “CFC” in our group, if any. Because our group
includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries could be treated as CFCs, regardless of
whether we are treated as a CFC. A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to
annually report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible
low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by CFCs, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An
individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a CFC generally would not be allowed certain tax
deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation.
Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a United States shareholder to significant monetary
penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to such shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return
for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist our
investors in determining whether any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are treated as a CFC or whether such investor is
treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such CFCs. Further, we cannot provide any assurances
that we will furnish to any United States shareholder information that may be necessary to comply with the reporting
and tax paying obligations described in this risk factor. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the
potential application of these rules to their investment in our ordinary shares or ADSs.
64
General Risks
The price of our ADSs may be volatile and may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control.
The trading market for publicly traded emerging biopharmaceutical and drug discovery and development companies
has been highly volatile and is likely to remain highly volatile in the future. The market price of our ADSs may
fluctuate significantly due to a variety of factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
positive or negative results from, or delays in, clinical trials of ensifentrine;
developments in our competitors’ businesses;
in entering
delays
to development or
into collaborations and strategic relationships with respect
commercialization of ensifentrine or entry into collaborations and strategic relationships on terms that are not
deemed to be favorable to us;
technological innovations or commercial product introductions by us or competitors;
changes in government regulations;
developments concerning proprietary rights, including patents and litigation matters;
public concern relating to the commercial value or safety of ensifentrine;
financing or other corporate transactions;
publication of research reports or comments by securities or industry analysts or commentators;
general market conditions in the pharmaceutical industry or in the economy as a whole;
the loss of any of our key scientific or senior management personnel;
sales of our ADSs by us, our senior management or board members, and significant holders of our ADSs; or
other events and factors, many of which are beyond our control.
These and other market and industry factors may cause the market price and demand for our ADSs to fluctuate
substantially, regardless of our actual operating performance, which may limit or prevent investors from readily
selling their ADSs and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our ADSs. In addition, the stock market in
general, and biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations
that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. In the past,
when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have sometimes instituted securities class
action litigation against the issuer. If any of the holders of our ADSs were to bring such a lawsuit against us, we
could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit and the attention of our senior management would be diverted
from the operation of our business. Any adverse determination in litigation could also subject us to significant
liabilities.
Future sales, or the possibility of future sales, of a substantial number of our ADSs or ordinary shares could
adversely affect the price of our ADSs.
Future sales of a substantial number of our ADSs or ordinary shares, or the perception that such sales will occur,
could cause a decline in the market price of our ADSs. Sales in the United States of our ADSs and ordinary shares
held by our directors, officers and affiliated shareholders are subject to restrictions. If these shareholders sell
substantial amounts of ordinary shares or ADSs in the public market, or the market perceives that such sales may
occur, the market price of our ADSs and our ability to raise capital through an issue of equity securities in the future
could be adversely affected.
If securities or industry analysts or commentators publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our
business, the price of our ADSs and ordinary shares and our trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ADSs and ordinary shares depends in part on the research and reports that securities or
industry analysts or commentators publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us
downgrade our ADSs or if they or other industry commentators publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or
comments about our business, the price of our ADSs and ordinary shares would likely decline. If one or more of
these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our ADSs could decrease,
which might cause the price of our ADSs and ordinary shares and trading volume to decline.
65
We have incurred and expect to continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company in
the United States, and our senior management are required to devote substantial time to new compliance
initiatives and corporate governance practices.
As a U.S. public company, and particularly after we no longer qualify as an EGC, we have incurred and expect to
continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur prior to becoming a U.S.
public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various
requirements on non-U.S. reporting public companies, including the establishment and maintenance of effective
disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our senior management and other personnel
have devoted and will need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives.
Moreover, these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will
make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
These rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity,
and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and
governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by
our senior management on our internal control over financial reporting. However, while we remain an EGC, we will
not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent
registered public accounting firm. To prepare for eventual compliance with Section 404, once we no longer qualify
as an EGC, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting,
which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources,
potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of
internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through
testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process
for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude,
within the prescribed time frame or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by
Section 404. If we identify one or more material weaknesses, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial
markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters is in leased office space at 3 More London Riverside, London, U.K. The leases on the
offices expire in the first quarter of 2023. We also have office space at 8045 Arco Corporate Drive, Suite 130,
Raleigh, NC 27617, USA, that expires in the second quarter of 2024. We believe that these facilities are adequate to
meet our current and near term needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We
are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
66
Market Information and Holders
Prior to October 30, 2020, our ordinary shares were traded on the AIM Market of the London Stock Exchange under
the symbol “VRP”. We canceled the admission of the ordinary shares to trading on AIM on October 30, 2020 and
our ordinary shares are now not publicly traded. Our American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) have been publicly
traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “VRNA” since April 27, 2017.
Each ADS represents eight ordinary shares of Verona Pharma plc.
As of February 18, 2022, 99.7% of our ordinary shares are held in ADS form, between 54 registered holders. The
0.3% balance of our ordinary shares are held as unlisted ordinary shares.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that we will retain all of our
future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
67
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those statements included later in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, beliefs and expectations that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in these
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those
discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors”
and the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative
therapeutics for the treatment of respiratory diseases with significant unmet medical need. Our product candidate,
ensifentrine, is an investigational, potential first-in-class, inhaled, dual inhibitor of the enzymes phosphodiesterase 3
and 4, or PDE3 and PDE4, which is designed to act as both a bronchodilator and an anti-inflammatory agent.
During 2021 we made substantial progress in our Phase 3 ENHANCE (“Ensifentrine as a Novel inHAled Nebulized
COPD thErapy”) clinical program. Patient enrollment completed in the 48-week subset of the ENHANCE-1 trial in
December 2021 and in the ENHANCE-2 trial in January 2022. Complete enrollment in the 24-week subset of
ENHANCE-1 is expected around the end of the second quarter of 2022. We expect to report top-line data from
ENHANCE-2 in the third quarter of 2022 and from ENHANCE-1 around the end of 2022. Conditional upon positive
results, we intend to file a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the US Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) in
the first half of 2023.
If approved, we intend to commercialize ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (“COPD”) via a standard jet nebulizer in the United States. Outside the US, we intend to license
ensifentrine to companies with expertise and experience in developing and commercializing products in those
regions. To that end, we have entered a strategic collaboration with Nuance Pharma Limited (“Nuance Pharma”), a
Shanghai-based specialty pharmaceutical company, to develop and commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China.
We have incurred recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception, and have an
accumulated deficit of $263.7 million as of December 31, 2021. We expect to incur additional losses and negative
cash flows from operations until our product candidates potentially gain regulatory approval and reach commercial
profitability, if at all.
We anticipate that our expenses will increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:
•
•
•
•
continue to invest in the clinical development of ensifentrine for the treatment of COPD;
manufacture ensifentrine and engage in other Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control activities;
maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; and
enhance our commercial insights and capabilities.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021, together with funding expected to become
available under the $30.0 million debt financing facility secured in November 2020 and from cash receipts from
U.K. tax credits, will enable us to fund our planned operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through
at least the end of 2023.
68
COVID-19 impact and business continuity
We are closely monitoring the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and clinical trials, in
particular the timelines and costs of our Phase 3 clinical program. The pandemic and associated government and
other measures in response continue to impact a number of clinical trial activities and we will provide an update if
we become aware of any meaningful disruption caused by the pandemic to our clinical trials.
To help protect the health and safety of the patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals involved in its ongoing
clinical trials of ensifentrine, as well as our employees and independent contractors, we continue to follow guidance
from the FDA and other health regulatory authorities regarding the conduct of clinical trials during the COVID-19
pandemic to ensure the safety of study participants, minimize risks to study integrity, and maintain compliance with
good clinical practice.
The COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting supply chains, and employee retention and recruitment, globally and we are
closely monitoring this situation and will provide an update if we become aware of any meaningful disruption
caused by the pandemic to the supply of ensifentrine and drug-related products, equipment and services for our
clinical trials.
Significant agreements
Ligand agreement
In 2006 we acquired Rhinopharma and assumed contingent liabilities owed to Ligand UK Development Limited
(“Ligand”) (formerly Vernalis Development Limited). We refer to the assignment and license agreement as the
Ligand Agreement.
Ligand assigned to us all of its rights to certain patents and patent applications relating to ensifentrine and related
compounds (the “Ligand Patents”) and an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license under certain Ligand know-
how to develop, manufacture and commercialize products (the “Licensed Products”) developed using Ligand
Patents, Ligand know-how and the physical stock of certain compounds.
The contingent liability comprises a milestone payment on obtaining the first approval of any regulatory authority
for the commercialization of a Ligand Licensed Product, low single digit royalties based on the future sales
performance of all Ligand Licensed Products and a portion equal to a mid-twenty percent of any consideration
received from any sub-licensees for the Ligand Patents and for Ligand know-how.
At time of the acquisition the contingent liability was not recognized as part of the acquisition accounting as it was
immaterial. We will therefore record as a research and development expense the milestone payment or royalties
when they are probable.
Nuance agreement
We entered into a collaboration and license agreement (the “Nuance Agreement”) with Nuance Pharma effective
June 9, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) under which we granted Nuance Pharma the exclusive rights to develop and
commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau). In return, we received an
unconditional right to consideration aggregating $40.0 million consisting of $25.0 million in cash and an equity
interest valued at $15.0 million as of the Effective Date in Nuance Biotech, the parent company of Nuance Pharma.
We are eligible to receive future milestone payments of up to $179.0 million, triggered upon achievement of certain
clinical, regulatory, and commercial milestones as well as tiered double-digit royalties on net sales in Greater China.
As of December 31, 2021, the $25.0 million cash payment and $15.0 million equity interest had been received and
the holding in Nuance Biotech was recorded as Equity Interest on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The equity interest is recorded at the fair value indicated by the last
observable transaction in Nuance Biotech’s stock, which was a fund raising in November, 2020, subject to
impairment. As of December 31, 2021, there had been no other observable transactions to indicate any price changes
in the value of Nuance Biotech’s stock, nor had there been any indications of impairment. The equity interest is
therefore recorded at a value of $15.0 million.
Nuance Pharma will be responsible for all costs related to clinical development and commercialization of
ensifentrine in Greater China. A joint steering committee has been established between us and Nuance Pharma to
oversee and coordinate the overall conduct of such clinical development and commercialization. We intend to use
the joint steering committee to help ensure the clinical development of ensifentrine in Greater China aligns with our
overall global development and commercialization strategy.
69
Under the terms of the Nuance Agreement, at any time until three months prior to the expected submission of the
first New Drug Application in Greater China, if (i) a third party is interested in partnering with us, either globally or
in territory covering at least the United States or Europe, for the development and/or commercialization of
ensifentrine or (ii) we undergo a change of control, we will have an exclusive option right to buy back the license
granted to Nuance Pharma and all related assets. The price is agreed to be equal to the aggregate of (i) all prior
amounts paid by Nuance Pharma to us in cash under the agreement and (ii) all development and regulatory costs
incurred and paid by Nuance Pharma in connection with the development and commercialization of the ensifentrine
under the Nuance Agreement multiplied by a single-digit factor range dependent upon achievement of certain
milestones, subject to a specified maximum amount.
The Nuance Agreement will continue on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction and product-by-product basis until the
expiration of royalty payment obligations with respect to such product in such jurisdiction unless earlier terminated
by the parties. Either party may terminate the Nuance Agreement for an uncured material breach or bankruptcy of
the other party. Nuance Pharma may also terminate the Nuance Agreement at will upon 90 days' prior written notice.
We reviewed the buy-back option and determined that because it is conditional on a third party we do not have the
practical ability to exercise it and, accordingly, the contract is accounted for under ASC 606.
The transaction price at the Effective Date of the Nuance Agreement was $40.0 million consisting of the $25.0
million upfront cash payment and $15.0 million equity interest. Developmental and regulatory milestones, and the
manufacture and supply of ensifentrine drug product, were not included in the transaction price as we determined
that it is not probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur.
Commercial milestones and sales royalties were also excluded and will be recognized when the milestones are
achieved or the sales occur in Greater China.
The performance obligations in the Nuance Agreement include the grant of the license (including the right to
commercialize ensifentrine until the end of the term, the sharing of certain know how, and the sharing of certain
clinical and regulatory data), and manufacture and supply of ensifentrine drug product. We have determined that the
manufacturing and supply was not at a discount.
We have determined that the license and the know how shared with Nuance Pharma constitutes functional
intellectual property and that revenue relating to this should be recognized at a point in time. Consequently, we have
determined that we fulfilled our obligations to Nuance Pharma when we delivered the know how that will allow
Nuance Pharma to file an investigational new drug application in Greater China. We delivered this know how in the
year ended December 31, 2021, and the $40.0 million revenue was therefore recognized as revenue in the year
ended. Revenue relating to the manufacture and supply obligations will be recognized when the drug product is
delivered.
On the Effective Date, $4.0 million of costs of obtaining the contract were recorded as a contract asset. As of
December 31, 2021, the entire cost had been recognized as Selling, General and Administrative expense in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations, in line with recognition of the revenue relating to the contract.
Subsequent to the Effective Date, Ligand notified us that it believes that Nuance Pharma is a sub-licensee under the
Ligand Agreement and that we are therefore under an obligation to make a sublicense payment to Ligand equal to
25% of the $40.0 million upfront transaction price. We do not believe we have granted a sublicense of or otherwise
transferred to Nuance Pharma any Ligand intellectual property or know how and therefore we believe that we are
not under any obligation to pay the requested sum to Ligand.
For additional information regarding the Nuance Agreement, see Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Warrants
On July 29, 2016, as part of a private placement we issued warrants to investors. The warrant holders can subscribe
for an ordinary share at a per share exercise price of £1.7238. They can also opt for a cashless exercise of their
warrants whereby they can choose to exchange the warrants held for a reduced number of warrants exercisable at nil
consideration.
If, after a transaction, should the warrants be exercisable for unlisted securities, the warrant holders may demand a
cash payment instead of the delivery of the underlying securities. Accordingly, they are accounted for as a liability
under ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” and recorded at fair value using the Black-Scholes
valuation methodology, on recognition and at each reporting date. The warrants are currently exercisable and may be
exercised by the holders until May 2, 2022 when the warrant instruments may either be exercised, cashlessly
exercised, or expire.
70
Loan and security agreement
In November 2020, we and Verona Pharma Inc. entered into a term loan facility of up to $30.0 million with Silicon
Valley Bank (the “Term Loan”). See “Indebtedness” for additional information.
71
Critical accounting estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("US GAAP"). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent liabilities as of the dates of the balance sheets and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
periods. In accordance with US GAAP, we evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis.
Research and development costs
Research and development (“R&D”) costs are charged to the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, as incurred. As part of the process of preparing financial statements we are required to estimate
our expenses resulting from our obligation under contracts with vendors and consultants and clinical site agreements
in connection with our R&D efforts. The financial terms of these contracts are subject to negotiations which vary
contract to contract and may result in payment flows that do not match the periods over which materials or services
are provided under such contracts. Our objective is to reflect the appropriate clinical trial expenses in our financial
statements by matching those expenses with the period in which services and efforts are expended. We account for
these expenses according to the progress of the trials and other development activities measured by patient
progression and the timing of various aspects of the trial. We also determine prepaid and accrual estimates through
discussions with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the progress of clinical trials, or other
services completed. During the course of a clinical trial, we may adjust our rate of clinical trial expense recognition
if actual results differ from its estimates. We make estimates of its prepaid and accrued expenses as of each balance
sheet date in our financial statements based on facts and circumstances known at that time. Although we do not
expect our estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, our understanding of the status and
timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and may result
in us reporting amounts that are too high or too low for any particular period. Our clinical trial prepaid and accrual
expense is dependent upon the timely and accurate reporting of study recruitment from contract research
organizations and activities carried out by other third-party vendors as well as the timely processing of any change
orders from the contract research organizations.
72
Components of results of operations
We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
conduct our ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials for ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of COPD;
continue the clinical development of our DPI and pMDI formulations of ensifentrine and research and develop
other formulations of ensifentrine;
initiate and conduct further clinical trials for ensifentrine for the treatment of acute COPD, cystic fibrosis
(“CF”) or any other indication;
initiate and progress pre-clinical studies relating to other potential indications of ensifentrine;
seek to discover and develop additional product candidates;
seek regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;
potentially establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure and scale-up manufacturing capabilities to
commercialize any products for which we may obtain regulatory approval;
• maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;
•
•
add clinical, scientific, operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including
personnel to support our product development and potential future commercialization efforts and to support our
continuing operations as a U.S. public company; and
experience any delays or encounter any issues from any of the above, including but not limited to failed studies,
complex results, safety issues or other regulatory challenges.
Revenue
To date, the company has not generated revenue from the sale of any products. All revenue to date has been derived
from the receipt of up-front proceeds under the Nuance Agreement.
In the future, we anticipate generating revenue from a combination of sales of our products, if approved, whether
through our own or a third-party sales force, and license fees, milestone payments and royalties in connection with
strategic collaborations regarding ensifentrine or other potential products. We expect that any revenue we generate
will fluctuate from quarter to quarter. If we or our strategic partners fail to complete the development of ensifentrine
in a timely manner or obtain regulatory approval for them, or if we fail to develop our own sales force or find one or
more strategic partners for the commercialization of approved products, our ability to generate future revenue, and
our financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
Operating expenses
R&D costs
R&D costs consist of salary and personnel related costs and third party costs for our research and development
activities for ensifentrine. Personnel related costs include a share based compensation charge relating to our stock
option plan. The largest component of third party costs is for clinical trials, as well as manufacturing for clinical
supplies and associated development, and pre-clinical studies. Research and development costs are expensed as
incurred.
We expect our research and development costs for the next few quarters to remain at a level consistent with the 2021
level and then decrease as the ENHANCE program winds down. Due to the nature of research and development, the
expected costs are inherently uncertain and may vary significantly from our current expectations.
Selling, general and administrative costs
Selling, general and administrative costs consist of salary and personnel related costs, including share based
expense, expenses relating to operating as a public company, including professional fees, insurance, commissions to
financial advisors and commercial related costs.
We expect our general and administrative costs and, in particular, our commercial costs to increase as we continue to
develop our potential commercial operations and, in the event of successful regulatory approval, we expect to incur
73
sales force, marketing and other launch related costs. As we develop our knowledge of the market and refine our
commercialization plans, expected costs may vary significantly from our current expectations.
74
Other income/(expense)
Other income/(expense) are driven by changes in valuation of the U.K. tax credits, interest income, interest expense,
warrants and foreign exchange movements on cash and cash equivalents
We participate in the U.K. Small and Medium Enterprises R&D tax relief program. The tax credits are calculated as
a percentage of qualifying research and development expenditure and are payable in cash by the U.K. government to
the Company. Credits recorded in the 2021 financial year are expected to be received in the 2022 financial year.
The U.K. tax authorities have enacted new rules, effective for accounting periods starting after April 1, 2021,
whereby the amount of SME payable R&D tax credit that a business can receive in any one year will be capped at
£20,000 plus three times the company’s total pay-as-you-earn (“PAYE”) withholding taxes and social security
liability for the year. Exemptions to the cap have been introduced which are available to companies that meet certain
conditions. We are currently reviewing the impact these new rules could have on our tax credit for the year ending
December 31, 2022, which would be receivable in 2023.
Taxation
We are subject to corporate taxation in the United States and the United Kingdom. We have generated losses since
inception and have therefore not paid United Kingdom corporation tax. The income taxes presented in our
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss represents the tax impact from our operating activities
in the United States, which generates taxable income based on intercompany service arrangements.
United Kingdom losses may be carried forward indefinitely to be offset against future taxable profits, subject to
various utilization criteria and restrictions. The amount that can be offset each year is limited to £5.0 million plus an
incremental 50% of U.K. taxable profits.
75
Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
The following table shows our statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in
thousands):
Revenue
Operating expenses:
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Total operating expenses
Operating loss
Other income/(expense):
Research and development tax credit
Interest income
Interest expense
Fair value movement on warrants
Foreign exchange gain
Total other income, net
Loss before income taxes
Income tax income/(expense)
Net loss
Revenue
$
$
Year ended December 31,
2021
2020
Variance
40,000 $
— $
40,000
79,406 $
33,907
113,313
44,505 $
29,772 $
74,277
(73,313)
(74,277)
34,901
4,135
39,036
964
15,630
14
(340)
2,246
176
17,726
8,267
121
(35)
(1,136)
2,060
9,277
(55,587)
(65,000)
18
(146)
$
(55,569) $
(65,146) $
7,363
(107)
(305)
3,382
(1,884)
8,449
9,413
164
9,577
Revenue of $40.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 is related to upfront consideration received under
the Nuance Agreement. There was no revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Research and development costs
Research and development costs were $79.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $44.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $34.9 million. This increase was primarily driven by
an increase in clinical costs of $35.0 million as the majority of enrollment relating to the ENHANCE program
occurred in 2021.
Selling, general and administrative costs
Selling, general and administrative costs were $33.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to
$29.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $4.1 million. This increase was driven primarily
by a $2.9 million increase in share-based compensation charges, $4.0 million related to transaction advisory fees on
the Nuance Agreement, $0.9 million related to increased Directors’ and Officers’ insurance, partially offset by a
$2.1 million decrease related to severance incurred in 2020, and $1.9 million decrease of expenses relating to our
private placement in 2020 (the “Private Placement”).
Other income / (expense)
The R&D tax credit for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $15.6 million compared to a credit of $8.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $7.4 million. This increase is attributable to our higher
qualifying expenditure on research and development in 2021 compared to 2020.
The foreign exchange gain of $0.2 million in 2021 and $2.1 million in 2020 relate to the foreign exchange
movements on the cash and short term investments the Company holds in pounds sterling. In 2021, the vast majority
of our cash was held in USD resulting in lower impact of currency exchange rate changes.
Net loss
76
Net loss was $55.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $65.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2020. The decrease in net loss was primarily the result of the revenue from the Nuance Agreement
offset by an increase in operating costs and the increase in other income, net, discussed above.
Cash flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
Net cash used in operating activities
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
Operating activities
Year ended December 31,
2021
187,986 $
$
2020
Variance
30,428 $
157,558
(33,254)
(45,076)
11,822
(12)
9,710
(9,722)
(6,117)
192,343
(198,460)
(223)
148,380 $
581
187,986 $
(804)
(39,606)
$
Operating activities used $33.3 million of cash during the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily for clinical
development costs related to the ENHANCE program, employee related expenses, $4.0 million commission paid to
a financial advisor partially offset by the receipt of a $25.0 million net upfront payment related to our Nuance
Agreement and a increase in payables and accruals. Operating cash flows also included office operational expenses,
recruiting and legal fees.
Operating activities used $45.1 million of cash during the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily for clinical
development costs related to completing the Phase 2 program for ensifentrine and the initiation of the ENHANCE
program, employee related expenses and severance related costs. Operating cash flows also included office
operational expenses, recruiting and legal fees.
Investing activities
Net cash provided by investing activities decreased to $12.0 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2021, from
$9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 due to no movement of funds from short term investments to
cash in 2021 as all term deposits were moved to money market funds, which are classified as cash and cash
equivalents.
Financing activities
For the year ended December 31, 2021, financing activities used $6.1 million of net cash, related to $6.8 million
payments of withholding taxes from share-based awards offset by $0.7 million of proceeds from the ATM sales
agreement.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, financing activities provided $192.3 million of net cash, driven by net
proceeds from the Private Placement and the first advance received under the Term Loan. We received $185.5
million after costs in the Private Placement. Of the costs, $1.9 million were recorded in the statement of operations
and comprehensive loss and therefore included in net cash used in operating activities. Financing activities also
includes a net $4.9 million receipt from the Term Loan facility.
Liquidity and capital resources
We do not currently have any approved products and have never generated any revenue from product sales. To date,
we have financed our operations primarily through the issuances of our equity securities, including warrants, 2020
from borrowings under the Term Loan and in 2021 from the upfront payment agreed under the Nuance agreement.
We have incurred recurring losses since inception, including net losses of $55.6 million, and $65.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2021, we had an
accumulated deficit of $263.7 million. We expect to continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future.
77
Since inception we have financed our operations through the sales of Ordinary Shares of the Company, proceeds
from the Term Loan and a licensing agreement.
Open market sale agreement
In March 2021, we entered into an open market sale agreement with Jefferies LLC (“Jefferies”) to sell shares of our
ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs, with aggregate gross sales proceeds of up to $100.0 million, from time to
time, through an “at the market” equity offering program under which Jefferies will act as sales agent (the “ATM
Program”). We provided Jefferies with customary indemnification rights, and Jefferies is entitled to a commission at
a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross proceeds. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we sold 873,104
ordinary shares (equivalent to 109,138 ADSs) under the ATM Program, at an average price of approximately $0.86
per share (equivalent to $6.91 per ADS), raising aggregate net proceeds of approximately $0.7 million after
deducting issuance costs. As of December 31, 2021, $99.2 million of ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs,
remained available for sale under the ATM Program.
We have no ongoing material financing commitments, such as lines of credit or guarantees, that are expected to
affect our liquidity over the next five years, other than leases and the Term Loan with Silicon Valley Bank.
Indebtedness
In November, 2020, we and Verona Pharma, Inc. (“Verona U.S.”, and together with us, the “Borrowers”) entered
into the Term Loan facility of up to $30.0 million, consisting of term loan advances in an aggregate amount of $5.0
million funded at closing, a term loan advance available subject to certain terms and conditions in an aggregate
amount of $10.0 million (the “Term B Loan”) and a term loan advance available subject to certain terms and
conditions in an aggregate amount of $15.0 million (the “Term C Loan”), with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), the
proceeds of which will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
The Term Loan is governed by a loan and security agreement, dated as of November 19, 2020, between the
Borrowers and SVB, as amended (the “Loan Agreement”). The Term B Loan will be available, subject to and
customary terms and conditions, during the period commencing upon the achievement of a specific clinical
milestone relating to ensifentrine through and including September 30, 2022. The Term C Loan will be available,
subject to customary terms and conditions, during the period commencing upon the achievement of an additional
specific clinical milestone relating to ensifentrine through and including June 30, 2023.
The Term Loan will mature on November 1, 2024. Each advance under the Term Loan accrues interest at a floating
per annum rate equal to the greater of (a) the sum of the prime rate reported in The Wall Street Journal plus 1.00%
and (b) four and one-quarter of one percent (4.25%). The Term Loan provides for interest-only payments on a
monthly basis until the payment date immediately preceding December 1, 2023. Thereafter, amortization payments
will be payable monthly in equal installments of principal plus monthly payments of accrued interest. Upon
repayment (whether at maturity, upon acceleration or by prepayment or otherwise), the Borrowers shall make a final
payment to SVB in the amount of 10% of the aggregate Term Loans advanced (the "Final Payment"). The
Borrowers may prepay the Term Loan in full but not in part provided that the Borrowers (i) provide ten days prior
written notice to SVB, (ii) pays on the date of such prepayment (A) all outstanding principal plus accrued and
unpaid interest, (B) a prepayment fee of $450,000 plus 3.0% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid on or before the
first anniversary of the closing date; $300,000 plus 2.00% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid after the first
anniversary of the closing date and on or before the second anniversary of the closing date; and $150,000 plus
1.00% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid thereafter and prior to maturity, (C) the Final Payment and (D) all
other sums, if any, that shall become due and payable with respect to the Term Loan Advances, including interest at
a default rate with respect to any past due amounts. Amounts outstanding during an event of default are payable
upon SVB's demand and shall accrue interest at an additional rate of 3.0% per annum.
The Term Loan is secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers, other than the equity interest
in Verona U.S. and other than intellectual property, provided that such lien on substantially all assets includes any
rights to payments and proceeds from the sale, licensing or disposition of intellectual property. The Borrowers have
also granted SVB a negative pledge with respect to its intellectual property.
The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants and representations, including but not limited to financial
reporting obligations and limitations on dividends, indebtedness, collateral, investments, distributions, transfers,
mergers or acquisitions, taxes, corporate changes, deposit accounts, and subsidiaries. The Loan Agreement also
contains other customary provisions, such as expense reimbursement, non-disclosure obligations as well as
indemnification rights for the benefit of SVB. The Loan Agreement includes a minimum cash covenant triggered
when Borrowers' consolidated cash and cash equivalents drop below $45.0 million at any time after the earliest to
78
occur of any of the following: (i) the release of negative data from ENHANCE-2 and/or ENHANCE-1, which in the
reasonable business discretion of Borrowers’ senior management, would be considered insufficient to support
submission of an NDA to the FDA, (ii) the FDA issues a complete response letter with respect to an NDA submitted
for ensifentrine, or (iii) failure to achieve a specific regulatory milestone relating to ensifentrine by June 30, 2023
(extendable to March 31, 2024 upon the Borrowers receiving a specified amount of new cash proceeds after
September 8, 2020 from the sale of equity securities in one or more public financings or other bona fide equity
financings, subordinated debt and/or upfront/milestone payments from one or more collaboration agreements not
prohibited in the Loan Agreement). Upon such trigger, Borrowers must cash collateralize an amount equal to the
outstanding obligations to SVB plus the amount of any prepayment penalty and Final Payment which would be due
in the event the Loan Agreement were prepaid in full with respect to the Term Loans advanced as of such time.
The events of default under the Loan Agreement include, but are not limited to, the Borrowers’ failure to make any
payments of principal or interest under the Loan Agreement or other transaction documents, the Borrowers’ breach
or default in the performance of any covenant under the Loan Agreement or other transaction documents, the
occurrence of a material adverse change, any Borrower making a false or misleading representation or warranty in
any material respect under the Loan Agreement, any Borrower’s insolvency or bankruptcy, any attachment or
judgment on any Borrower’s assets of at least $500,000, or the occurrence of any default under any agreement or
obligation of any Borrower involving indebtedness in excess of $500,000. If an event of default occurs, SVB is
entitled to take enforcement action, including acceleration of amounts due under the Loan Agreement.
Funding requirements
We initiated our Phase 3 ENHANCE program for the maintenance treatment of COPD in the third quarter of 2020
after raising funds in the Private Placement that we estimated to be the required funds to complete this program. We
believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021, together with funding expected to become
available under the Term Loan and from cash receipts from U.K. tax credits, will enable us to fund our planned
operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through at least the end of 2023.
Our commercial revenue, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially
available for many years, if ever. Additionally we may enter into out licensing transactions from time to time
however there can be no assurance that the company can secure such transactions in the future. Accordingly, we will
need to obtain substantial additional funds to achieve our business objective including to further advance clinical and
regulatory activities, to fund prelaunch and launch related costs and to create an effective sales and marketing
organization to commercialize ensifentrine. We will need to seek additional funding through public or private
financings, debt financing, collaboration or licensing agreements and other arrangements. However, there is no
guarantee that we will be successful in securing additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership
interest of our shareholders and ADS holders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include
liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect such holders’ rights as a shareholder or ADS holder. Any future
debt financing or preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or
restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or
declaring dividends and may require the issuance of warrants, which could potentially dilute our security holders’
ownership interests. Additionally, we have a $100.0 million ATM facility that may be available for future use.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties,
we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product
candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds
through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product
development programs or any future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product
candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Our future capital requirements for ensifentrine or any future product candidates will depend on many factors,
including:
•
•
the progress, timing and completion of pre-clinical testing and clinical trials for ensifentrine or any future
product candidates and the potential that we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials for
ensifentrine;
the number of potential new product candidates we decide to in-license and develop;
79
•
•
•
•
•
•
the costs involved in growing our organization to the size needed to allow for the research, development and
potential commercialization of ensifentrine or any future product candidates;
the costs involved in filing patent applications and maintaining and enforcing patents or defending against
claims or infringements raised by third parties;
the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals for ensifentrine or any future product candidate
we develop and any delays we may encounter as a result of evolving regulatory requirements or adverse results
with respect to ensifentrine or any future product candidates;
any licensing or milestone fees we might have to pay during future development of ensifentrine or any future
product candidates;
selling and marketing activities undertaken in connection with the anticipated commercialization of ensifentrine
or any future product candidates, if approved, and costs involved in the creation of an effective sales and
marketing organization; and
the amount of revenues, if any, we may derive either directly or in the form of royalty payments from future
sales of ensifentrine or any future product candidates, if approved.
Recent accounting pronouncements
For a discussion of pending and recently adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide
the information otherwise required under this Item 7A.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The information required by this Item is set forth in the consolidated financial statements and notes as referenced in
Item 15 of Part IV of this Annual Report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of
possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d- 15(e)
under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based on such evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2021, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
80
Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based
on the criteria set forth in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over
financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm due to an
exemption established by the JOBS Act for “emerging growth companies.”
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None
Item 9C.
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
[Not applicable]
81
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Code of Ethics
PART III
Our board of directors has adopted a written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all officers,
directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have posted a current copy of our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics on our website at www.veronapharma.com in the “Investors” section under “Corporate
Governance.” We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment
to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as Nasdaq’s requirement to
disclose waivers with respect to directors and executive officers, by posting such information on our website at the
address and location specified above. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into
this Annual Report.
The remaining information required by this item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2022
Annual General Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by this item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be included in our definitive proxy statement for the 2022 Annual
General Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference to such proxy statement.
82
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following financial statements and the Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm are filed as part of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 876)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the information
required is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits.
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Incorporated by Reference to Filings Indicated
Exhibit
Number
3.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
10.1
10.2
10.3†
10.4.3
Exhibit Description
Articles of Association, as amended and as
currently in effect
Deposit Agreement
Form of American Depositary Receipt
(included in Exhibit 4.1)
Form of Warrant issued to each of the
investors named in Schedule A thereto
Warrant Instrument issued to NPlus1 Singer
LLP
Description of Securities
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July
29, 2016, by and among Verona Pharma plc
and the investors set forth therein
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July
16, 2020, by and among Verona Pharma plc
and the investors set forth therein
Intellectual Property Assignment and
Licence Agreement between Vernalis
Development Limited and Rhinopharma
Limited, as predecessor to Verona Pharma
plc, dated February 7, 2005
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma plc and Regus
Management (UK) Limited dated September
16, 2017#1
83
Form
File No.
6-K
20-F
001-38067
001-38067
Exhibit
No.
Filing
date
12/30/202
0
2.1 2/27/2018
1
Filed /
Furnished
Herewith
20-F
001-38067
2.2 2/27/2018
F-1
333-217124
4.3
4/3/2017
F-1
10-K
333-217124
001-38067
4/3/2017
4.4
4.5 2/25/2021
*
F-1
333-217124
10.1
4/3/2017
6-K
001-38067
2 7/22/2020
F-1
333-217124
10.2
4/3/2017
20-F
001-38067
4.3.3 2/27/2020
*
*
*
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma plc and Regus
Management (UK) Limited dated September
16, 2017#2
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma plc and Regus
Management (UK) Limited dated September
16, 2017#3
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma Inc. and Regus
Management Group LLC dated July 16, 2019
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma Plc. and Regus
Management (UK) Limited dated November
9, 2021
Renewal Agreement to Lease by and
between the Verona Pharma Plc. and Regus
Management (UK) Limited dated December
7, 2021
Agreement to Lease by and between the
Verona Pharma Inc. and Brier Creek Office
#4, LLC dated March 6, 2020
EMI Option Scheme
Unapproved Share Option Scheme, as
amended
2017 Incentive Award Plan and forms of
award agreements thereunder
Employment Agreement, dated January 28,
2020, between Verona Pharma Inc. and
David Zaccardelli, Pharm. D.
Employment Agreement, dated December
21, 2019, between Verona Pharma plc and
Kathleen Rickard
Employment Agreement, dated October 1,
2016, between Verona Pharma plc and Claire
Poll
Employment Agreement, dated February 1,
2020, between Verona Pharma Inc. and Mark
Hahn
Form of Indemnification Agreement for
board members
Form of Indemnification Agreement for
executive officers
Relationship Agreement relating to Verona
Pharma plc, dated July 29, 2016, by and
among the Verona Pharma plc, OrbiMed
Private Investments VI, LP and NPlus1
Singer Advisory LLP
Relationship Agreement relating to Verona
Pharma plc, dated July 29, 2016, by and
among the Verona Pharma plc, Abingworth
Bioventures VI LP and NPlus1 Singer
Advisory LLP
10.4.4
10.4.5
10.4.6
10.4.7
10.4.8
10.4.9
10.5#
10.6#
10.7#
10.8#
10.9#
10.11#
10.12#
10.13#
10.14#
10.15
10.16
20-F
001-38067
4.3.4 2/27/2020
20-F
001-38067
4.3.5 2/27/2020
20-F
001-38067
4.3.6 2/27/2020
F-1
333-217124
10.4
4/3/2017
F-1
333-217124
10.5
4/3/2017
20-F
001-38067
4.6 2/27/2018
20-F
001-38067
4.7 2/27/2020
20-F
001-38067
4.8 3/19/2019
F-1
333-217124
10.9
4/3/2017
F-1
333-247928 10.12 8/17/2020
F-1/A 333-217124
10.11.1 4/18/2017
F-1/A 333-217124
10.11.2 4/18/2017
F-1
333-217124
10.12
4/3/2017
F-1
333-217124
10.13
4/3/2017
84
Relationship Agreement relating to Verona
Pharma plc, dated July 29, 2016, by and
among the Verona Pharma plc, Vivo
Ventures Fund VII, L.P., Vivo Ventures VII
Affiliates Fund, L.P., Vivo Ventures Fund
VI, L.P., Vivo Ventures VI Affiliates Fund,
L.P. and NPlus1 Singer Advisory LLP
Relationship Agreement relating to Verona
Pharma plc, dated July 29, 2016, by and
among the Verona Pharma plc, Vivo
Ventures Fund VII, L.P., Vivo Ventures VII
Affiliates Fund, L.P., Vivo Ventures Fund
VI, L.P., Vivo Ventures VI Affiliates Fund,
L.P. and NPlus1 Singer Advisory LLP
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of
November 19, 2020, by and among Silicon
Valley Bank, Verona Pharma plc and Verona
Pharma, Inc.
First Amendment to Loan and Security
Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2020,
by and among Silicon Valley Bank, Verona
Pharma plc and Verona Pharma, Inc.
Second Amendment to Loan and Security
Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2022, by
and among Silicon Valley Bank, Verona
Pharma plc and Verona Pharma, Inc.
Form of Non-Executive Director letter of
appointment
Collaboration and License Agreement,
effective as of June 9, 2021, by and between
Verona Pharma plc, Nuance Pharma Limited
and Nuance (Shanghai) Pharma Co Ltd
List of Subsidiaries of Verona Pharma plc
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of
Chief Financial Officer
Section 1350 Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
Inline XBRL Instance Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Calculation Linkbase Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label
Linkbase Document
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Presentation Linkbase Document
10.17
10.18
10.19.1
10.19.2
10.19.3†
10.20#
10.21†
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.LAB
101.PRE
85
F-1
333-217124
10.14
4/3/2017
6-K
001-38067
1 7/22/2020
6-K
001-38067
1.1
11/24/202
0
10-K
001-38067 10.19.2
2/25/2021
10-K
001-38067
10.2 2/25/2021
10-Q
001-38067
10.1
8/5/2021
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
**
**
*
*
*
*
*
101.DEF
104
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Definition Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted
in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit
101)
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
# Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
*
*
† Portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks) have been omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item
601(b)(10). Such omitted information is not material and the registrant customarily and actually treats such
information as private or confidential. Additionally, schedules and attachments to this exhibit have been omitted
pursuant to Regulation S-K, Items 601(a)(5).
86
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
VERONA PHARMA PLC
Date: March 3, 2022
By:
/s/ David Zaccardelli
David Zaccardelli, Pharm. D.
President and Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
88
/s/ David Zaccardelli
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 3, 2022
David Zaccardelli, Pharm. D.
(principal executive officer)
/s/ Mark W. Hahn
Chief Financial Officer
March 3, 2022
(principal financial and accounting officer)
Chairperson of the Board of Directors
March 3, 2022
Mark W. Hahn
/s/ David Ebsworth, Ph.D.
David Ebsworth, Ph.D.
/s/ Ken Cunningham, M.D.
Ken Cunningham, M.D.
/s/ Lisa Deschamps
Lisa Deschamps
/s/ Martin Edwards, M.D.
Martin Edwards, M.D.
/s/ Rishi Gupta
Rishi Gupta
/s/ Mahendra Shah, Ph.D.
Mahendra Shah, Ph.D.
/s/ Andrew Sinclair, Ph.D.
Andrew Sinclair, Ph.D.
/s/ Vikas Sinha
Vikas Sinha
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
/s/ Anders Ullman, M.D., Ph.D.
Anders Ullman, M.D., Ph.D.
Director
89
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
March 3, 2022
Index
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 876)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021
and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Verona Pharma Plc
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Verona Pharma plc and its subsidiary (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, of shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for the years then ended, including the related notes
(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is
not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As
part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company will require additional financing to
fund future operations. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are described in Note 1.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Reading, United Kingdom
March 3, 2022
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.
F-2
Verona Pharma plc
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share amounts and par value of shares)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Prepaid expenses
Tax incentive receivables
Other current assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets:
Furniture and equipment, net
Goodwill
Equity interest
Right-of-use assets
Total non-current assets:
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Operating lease liability
Warrants
Taxes payable
Other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities:
Term loan
Operating lease liability
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity
December 31,
2021
2020
$
148,380 $
4,037
15,583
2,063
170,063
187,986
4,538
8,260
1,720
202,504
$
$
80
545
15,000
899
16,524
186,587 $
107
545
—
1,050
1,702
204,206
10,044 $
22,256
648
—
147
327
33,422
4,874
286
5,160
38,582
178
10,863
798
2,246
—
118
14,203
4,635
514
5,149
19,352
Ordinary £0.05 par value shares: 489,177,550 and 488,304,446 issued, and
480,082,966 and 463,304,446 outstanding, at December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Ordinary shares held in treasury
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated deficit
Total shareholders' equity
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
31,855
31,794
385,070
(603)
(4,601)
(263,716)
148,005
186,587 $
366,411
(1,700)
(4,601)
(207,050)
184,854
204,206
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Verona Pharma plc
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenue
Operating expenses:
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Total operating expenses
Operating loss
Other income/(expense):
Research and development tax credit
Interest income
Interest expense
Fair value movement on warrants
Foreign exchange gain
Total other income, net
Loss before income taxes
Income tax income/(expense)
Net loss
Other comprehensive loss:
Year ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
40,000 $
—
79,406
33,907
113,313
44,505
29,772
74,277
(73,313)
(74,277)
15,630
14
(340)
2,246
176
17,726
8,267
121
(35)
(1,136)
2,060
9,277
(55,587)
(65,000)
18
(146)
(55,569)
(65,146)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Total comprehensive loss attributable to shareholders of the Company
Loss per ordinary share — basic and diluted
—
$
$
(55,569) $
(0.12) $
(2,321)
(67,467)
(0.25)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Verona Pharma plc
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(in thousands except share data)
Ordinary shares
Number
Amount
Additional
paid-in
capital
Ordinary
shares held
in treasury
Accumulated
other
comprehensi
ve loss
Accumulated
deficit
Total
shareholders'
equity
Balance at January 1,
2020
105,326,638 $
7,265 $ 179,535 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
—
(2,280) $ (141,779) $
(65,146)
—
42,741
(65,146)
—
(2,321)
—
(2,321)
Net loss
Retranslation of
foreign operations
Issuance of ordinary
shares, net of
issuance costs
Issuance of ordinary
shares to treasury
Issuance of ordinary
shares from
restricted share units
and share options
Share-based
compensation
Balance at December
31, 2020
Net loss
Issuance of common
shares under at-the-
market sales
agreement
Restricted share
units vested
Share-based
compensation
Common shares
withheld for taxes
on vested stock
awards
Equity settled share-
based compensation
reclassified as cash-
settled
Balance at December
31, 2021
355,831,184
22,700
164,660
—
25,000,000
1,700
—
(1,700)
—
—
—
—
187,360
—
2,146,624
129
39
—
—
22,177
—
—
488,304,446 $ 31,794 $ 366,411 $ (1,700) $
—
(125)
43
—
22,177
(4,601) $ (207,050) $ 184,854
—
—
—
—
—
—
(55,569)
(55,569)
873,104
—
—
61
—
672
—
—
1,097
—
25,425
—
—
—
—
—
(1,097)
733
—
—
25,425
—
—
(6,850)
—
—
—
(6,850)
—
—
(588)
—
—
—
(588)
489,177,550 $ 31,855 $ 385,070 $
(603) $
(4,601) $ (263,716) $ 148,005
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Verona Pharma plc
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Operating activities:
Net loss:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Foreign exchange gain
Amortization of debt issue costs
Accretion of redemption premium on debt
Fair value movement on warrants
Impairment of right-of-use asset
Share-based compensation
Depreciation and amortization
Equity interest recognized as revenue
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses
Tax incentive receivables
Other current assets
Right-of-use assets
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Lease liabilities
Taxes payable
Other current liabilities
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of furniture and equipment
Sale of short-term investments
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares
Payment of offering costs in connection with the issuance of ordinary shares
Proceeds from issuance of term loan
Term loan issuance costs
Payments of withholding taxes from share-based awards
Proceeds from exercise of share options
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid
Interest paid
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Year ended December 31,
2021
2020
$
(55,569) $
(65,146)
(176)
(2,060)
114
125
(2,246)
—
25,425
629
(15,000)
501
(6,924)
(343)
(440)
9,866
11,389
(373)
147
(379)
10
8
1,136
289
22,177
623
—
(3,065)
768
187
(703)
(1,398)
1,940
110
—
48
(33,254)
(45,076)
(12)
—
(12)
(82)
9,792
9,710
733
—
—
—
(6,850)
—
(6,117)
(223)
(39,606)
187,986
148,380 $
200,156
(12,748)
5,000
(108)
—
43
192,343
581
157,558
30,428
187,986
1 $
215 $
8
7
$
$
$
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Organization and description of business operations
Verona Pharma plc (the "Company") is incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom. Verona Pharma plc has
one wholly-owned subsidiary, Verona Pharma,
Inc., a Delaware corporation. Rhinopharma Limited
(“Rhinopharma”), a Canadian company that was previously a non-operating, wholly-owned subsidiary, was
dissolved in June 2021. The address of the registered office is 1 Central Square, Cardiff, CF10 1FS, United
Kingdom.
The Company is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical group focused on developing and commercializing innovative
therapeutics for the treatment of respiratory diseases with significant unmet medical needs. The Company’s
American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) are listed on the Nasdaq Global Market (“Nasdaq”) and trade under the
symbol “VRNA”. The Company’s ordinary shares were also listed on the Alternative Investment Market of the
London Stock Exchange (“AIM”) until October 30, 2020, when the shares were delisted from AIM in an effort to
enhance liquidity of trading by combining all transactions on Nasdaq and to reduce costs through removing
duplicative listing and compliance fees.
Liquidity
The Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cashflows from operations since inception, and has an
accumulated deficit of $263.7 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company expects to incur additional losses and
negative cash flows from operations until its products potentially gain regulatory approval and reach commercial
profitability, if at all.
The Company expects that its cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021, will be sufficient to fund its
operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months from the date of issuance.
In March, 2021, the Company entered into an open market sale agreement with respect to an at-the-market offering
program (the “ATM Program”) under which the Company may issue and sell its ordinary shares in the form of
ADSs, with an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold 873,104 ordinary shares (equivalent to 109,138
ADSs) under the ATM Program, at an average price of approximately $0.86 per share (equivalent to $6.91 per
ADS), raising aggregate net proceeds of approximately $0.7 million after deducting issuance costs. As of December
31, 2021, there remained $99.3 million of ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs, available for sale under the ATM
Program.
The Company’s commercial revenue, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be
commercially available for many years, if ever. Additionally we may enter into out-licensing transactions from time
to time but there can be no assurance that the company can secure such transactions in the future. Accordingly, we
will need to obtain substantial additional funds to achieve our business objectives including to further advance
clinical and regulatory activities, to fund prelaunch and launch related costs and to create an effective sales and
marketing organization to commercialize ensifentrine. We will need to seek additional funding through public or
private financings, debt financing, collaboration or licensing agreements and other arrangements. However, there is
no guarantee that we will be successful in securing additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all.
Note 2 - Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting policies
Basis of presentation and consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Verona Pharma plc and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
Verona Pharma, Inc. and Rhinopharma through to its dissolution in June 2021. All inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. ("US GAAP") and the following accounting policies have been consistently applied.
At the end of the second quarter of 2020, the Company determined that it no longer qualified as a Foreign Private
Issuer under SEC rules. As a result, beginning January 1, 2021, the Company is required to report with the SEC on
domestic forms and comply with domestic company rules in the United States. The transition to US GAAP was
made retrospectively for all periods from the Company’s inception.
F-7
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these consolidated financial statements include, but are
not limited to, the accrual and prepayment of research and development expenses, the fair value of share-based
compensation, the fair value of warrants and the fair value of the equity interest received under the Nuance
Agreement (as defined below). Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and
experience. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ
from the Company’s estimates.
Business combinations
The Company applies the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred
for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred to the former
owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Company. The consideration transferred includes the
fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. The excess of the cost of
acquisition over the fair value of the Company's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured
initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in
administrative expenses.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of ninety days or less at
acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents includes deposits held at call with banks, term deposits
with maturities of less than three months at inception, and in money market funds investing in U.S. and U.K.
government debt and liquid securities from highly rated institutions.
Short-term investments
Short-term investments include fixed term deposits held at banks with original maturities between three months and
a year. They are classified as loans and receivables and are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest
method.
Equity interest
As part of the Nuance Agreement, the Company received an equity interest in Nuance Biotech, the parent company
of Nuance Pharma (see note 9). As Nuance Biotech’s securities are not publicly traded the equity interest’s fair
value is not readily determinable. The Company therefore follows guidance from ASC 321-10-35-2 and uses the fair
value measurement alternative and measures the securities at cost, which is deemed to be the value indicated by the
last observable transaction in Nuance Biotech's stock, subject to impairment. The valuation will be adjusted for any
observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment in Nuance Biotech, or if there
is an indicator of impairment.
Furniture and equipment, net
Furniture and equipment comprise office furniture and computer equipment and are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation, which is calculated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful economic lives, generally two to
five years.
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of goodwill related to the acquisition of Rhinopharma. Goodwill is not amortized but periodically
tested for impairment.
F-8
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Impairment of long-lived assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company initially compares the market
capitalization of the Company to the book value of its assets. If the value of the market capitalization does not
support the valuation of the assets, the Company reviews estimates of the cash flows over the remaining lives of its
other intangible assets, or related group of assets where applicable, in measuring whether the assets to be held and
used will be realizable. In the event of impairment, the Company would discount the future cash flows using its then
estimated incremental borrowing rate to estimate the amount of the impairment.
Ligand agreement
In 2006 the Company acquired Rhinopharma and assumed contingent liabilities owed to Ligand UK Development
Limited (“Ligand”) (formerly Vernalis Development Limited). The Company refers to the assignment and license
agreement as the Ligand Agreement.
Ligand assigned to the Company all of its rights to certain patents and patent applications relating to ensifentrine and
related compounds (the "Ligand Patents") and an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license under certain Ligand
know-how to develop, manufacture and commercialize products (the "Ligand Licensed Products") developed using
Ligand Patents, Ligand know-how and the physical stock of certain compounds.
The Company is obligated to pay a milestone payment on obtaining the first approval of any regulatory authority for
the commercialization of a Ligand Licensed Product, low single digit royalties based on the future sales performance
of all Ligand Licensed Products and a portion equal to a mid-twenty percent of any consideration received from any
sub-licensees for the Ligand Patents and for Ligand know-how. Royalties payable are based on the future sales
performance so the amount payable is unlimited.
At the time each contingency is resolved, the Company will record the contingent consideration payment (or
payable) in connection with the Ligand Agreement as an expense and will classify it within R&D expenses.
Revenue recognition
The Company’s revenue arises from the Company’s agreement for the development and commercialization of
ensifentrine in Greater China (the “Nuance Agreement”). The terms of the Nuance Agreement include non-
refundable upfront fees, payments based upon achievement of developmental and regulatory milestones, commercial
milestones, royalties payable on sales, and manufacturing and supply. These payments are viewed as both fixed and
variable consideration. Non-refundable upfront fees are considered fixed, while milestone payments and revenue
from the commercialized product are identified as variable consideration. The Company follows the five-step model
in ASC 606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”:
Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
All of the Company’s revenue is derived from contracts with customers.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the
unit of account in ASC Topic 606. The Company’s performance obligations include intellectual property rights,
(which include the license, patents and developmental and regulatory data) and manufacturing and supply.
Management are required to judge when performance obligations are satisfied and consequently when revenue is
recognized.
If the right to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance
obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable, upfront fees
allocated to the right when the right is transferred to the customer, and the customer can use and benefit from the
right.
F-9
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
If an arrangement includes development and regulatory milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the
milestones are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price
using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the
associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the
Company’s or the licensee’s control, such as regulatory approvals, are generally not considered probable of being
achieved until those approvals are received.
For arrangements with licenses of intellectual property that include sales-based royalties, including milestone
payments based on the level of sales, and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties
relate, the Company recognizes royalty revenue and sales-based milestones at the later of (i) when the related sales
occur, or (ii) when the performance obligation to which the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied.
Research and development costs
Research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses include
salaries, share-based compensation and benefits of employees, and other costs related to the Company’s R&D
activities, including contracts with clinical research organizations and contract manufacturers. As part of the process
of preparing financial statements the Company is required to estimate its expenses resulting from its obligations
under contracts with vendors and consultants and clinical site agreements in connection with its R&D efforts. The
financial terms of these contracts are subject to negotiations which vary contract to contract and may result in
payment flows that do not match the periods over which materials or services are provided to the Company under
such contracts. The Company’s objective is to reflect the appropriate clinical trial expenses in its financial
statements by matching those expenses with the period in which services and efforts are expended. The Company
accounts for these expenses according to the progress of the trials and other development activities measured by
patient progression and the timing of various aspects of the trial. The Company determines prepaid and accrual
estimates through discussions with applicable personnel and outside service providers as to the progress of clinical
trials, or other services completed. During the course of a clinical trial, the Company adjusts its rate of clinical trial
expense recognition if actual results differ from its estimates. The Company makes estimates of its prepaid and
accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in its financial statements based on facts and circumstances known at
that time. Although the Company does not expect its estimates to be materially different from amounts actually
incurred, its understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of
services performed may vary and may result in the Company reporting amounts that are too high or too low for any
particular period. The Company’s clinical trial prepaid and accrual expense is dependent upon the timely and
accurate reporting of study recruitment from contract research organizations and activities carried out by other third-
party vendors as well as the timely processing of any change orders from the contract research organizations.
Share-based compensation
The Company has a share-based compensation plan under which various types of equity-based awards may be
granted, including stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). The fair value of share options and RSUs, which
are subject to milestone or service conditions with graded vesting, are recognized as compensation expense using the
cliff vesting method; forfeitures are recognized as they occur.
The Company uses the fair-value based method to determine compensation for all arrangements under which
employees receive shares. The fair value of each option and RSU is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-
Scholes valuation model that uses assumptions for expected volatility, expected dividends, expected term, and the
risk-free interest rate. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s ordinary shares over
the expected term of the options. The expected term of options granted is derived using the simplified method,
which computes the expected term as the average of the sum of the vesting term plus the contract term. Historically
the risk-free rate has been based on the appropriate U.K. government debt yield. After delisting its Ordinary shares
from AIM on October 30, 2020, the Company used U.S. government debt yields.
Details of the assumptions used are set out in note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Other income - United Kingdom R&D tax credits
Other operating income relates to R&D tax credits receivable in the UK. As a company that carries out extensive
research and development activities, Verona is subject to the UK R&D Small and Medium Enterprise (“SME”)
Program. Qualifying expenditures largely comprise employment costs for research staff, consumables, a proportion
of relevant, permitted sub-contract costs and certain internal overhead costs incurred as part of research projects for
which it does not receive income.
Tax credits related to the SME Program are received as cash and are recorded as other income, as they are akin to
grant income, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). This Topic
prescribes the use of the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liability account balances are determined
based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
The Company provides a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable
value. ASC 740 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. ASC 740 clarified the
accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet
before being recognized in the financial statements. The Company has no uncertain tax positions.
Comprehensive loss
The Company accounts for comprehensive loss in accordance with ASC 220, “Income Statement - Reporting
Comprehensive Income”. Comprehensive income represents all changes in stockholders’ equity during the period
except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, stockholders.
Segment Reporting
The Company has one operating and reportable segment, pharmaceutical development. The Company’s long-lived
assets are held in the United Kingdom.
Foreign Currencies
Reporting currency
The Company’s reporting currency is U.S. dollars. Prior to July 1, 2020, Verona Pharma plc’s functional currency
was pounds sterling and its financial statements were translated to U.S. dollars. The statement of comprehensive
income was translated at average rates for the period, assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date exchange rate
and equity balances at historical rates. Translation differences were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income / (loss).
Functional currency
The Company's consolidated financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic
environment in which the entity operates, which was pounds sterling for Verona Pharma plc until June 30, 2020.
In the six months to June 30, 2020, management changes resulted in lower people costs being paid in pounds
sterling. Following the Company’s private placement in July 2020 (the “Private Placement”) the Company entered
into contracts to commence Phase 3 trials for ensifentrine and the majority of the costs are incurred in U.S. dollars.
Management reviewed budgeted activities over the next five years and identified that the majority of costs from the
second half of 2020 onwards will be incurred in U.S. dollars. Furthermore, the Private Placement raised funds in
U.S. dollars and having delisted from AIM any future fundraises will be in U.S. dollars. Also, the commercial focus
of Company is the U.S. market.
As a consequence, management determined the Company's functional currency changed from pounds sterling to
U.S. dollars and was accounted for prospectively from July 1, 2020. To convert Verona Pharma plc’s books and
records into U.S. dollars, income and expenses were translated at average rates, assets and liabilities at the June 30,
2020, exchange rate, and equity balances at historical rates. Translation differences were recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income/(loss).
F-11
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Treasury shares
In the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company incorporated a trust to facilitate the acquisition of shares, by or
for the benefit of employees and former employees. In the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued
25 million ordinary shares (equivalent to 3.125 million ADSs) to cover expected shares issued upon the vesting of
share awards to employees.
The Company has the indirect ability to control the trust as trustees are required to act in accordance with the trust
deed and because the Company controls the issuance of shares to cover awards. As a consequence, the trust is
consolidated into the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The shares that were issued to the trust that have
not been issued to employees to satisfy vesting of share awards are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as
treasury shares.
Fair value of financial instruments
US GAAP defines fair value and requires companies to establish a framework for measuring fair value and
disclosure about fair value measurements using a three-tier approach. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
Our financial instruments include cash equivalents, an equity interest, other assets, accounts payable and accrued
expenses and other liabilities. Fair value estimates of these instruments are made at a specific point in time, based on
relevant market information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgement and therefore cannot be determined with precision. The equity interest is held at cost subject
to impairment, following guidance from ASC 321-10-35-2. The carrying amounts of the other instruments are
considered to be representative of their fair values because of their short-term nature.
Concentration of credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of principally cash
and cash equivalents, bank deposits and certain receivables.
The Company holds cash and cash equivalents with highly rated financial institutions and in highly rated money
market funds and the Company has not experienced any significant credit losses in these accounts and does not
believe the Company is exposed to any significant credit risk on these instruments.
Lease accounting
The company accounts for leases in accordance with ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”). The
standard requires lessees to recognize almost all leases on the balance sheet as right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease
liabilities, and requires leases to be classified as either operating or finance type leases.
Under ASC 842, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and liabilities are
recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments. For this purpose, the
Company considers only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement.
As the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company determines the incremental borrowing rate in
calculating the present value of lease payments. The ROU assets also include any lease payments made prior to
commencement and are recorded net of any lease incentives received.
The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease. When it is reasonably certain the
Company will exercise such options the lease will be recognized as a liability and a corresponding ROU asset also
recognized.
Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets in current and non-current operating lease liabilities on
the Company's Consolidated Balance sheets.
F-12
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Recently issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Measurement of
Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology.
Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity is required to recognize an
allowance that reflects its current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial
instrument based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. In November
2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and
Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates (“ASU 2019-10”). The purpose of this amendment is
to create a two tier rollout of major updates, staggering the effective dates between larger public companies and all
other entities. This granted certain classes of companies, including Smaller Reporting Companies (“SRCs”),
additional time to implement major FASB standards, including ASU 2016-13. Larger public companies will have an
effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. All other entities are permitted to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13, and its related amendments, until the
earlier of fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Under the current SEC definitions, we meet the
definition of an SRC as of the ASU 2019-10 issuance date and are deferring adoption for ASU 2016-13. The
guidance requires a modified retrospective transition approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of
ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements, but do not believe the adoption of this standard will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require
adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon
adoption.
Note 3 - Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
Clinical trial and other development costs
Insurance
Other
Total prepaid expenses
Note 4 - Tax incentive receivables
Taxes receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
R&D tax credit receivable - U.K.
Tax receivable - U.S.
Total tax receivable
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
2,169 $
1,555
313
4,037 $
2,551
1,701
286
4,538
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
15,583 $
—
15,583 $
8,202
58
8,260
F-13
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Property leases
The right-of-use assets (“ROU”) relate to rented office space in London and North Carolina, with leases ending in
2023 and 2024, respectively.
In the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company extended its existing London lease. As a consequence it
modified its accounting for the lease and recorded $0.6 million lease liability and corresponding ROU asset.
In the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company entered into a lease arrangement in North Carolina for office
space and recognized lease liability and corresponding ROU asset of $0.7 million.
To calculate lease liabilities the Company used a weighted average discount rate of 8%. The weighted average
remaining lease term is 1.8 years.
Minimum annual payments over the remaining lease periods as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
2022
2023
2024
Total minimum future lease payments
Less: imputed interest
Total operating lease liabilities
655
276
38
969
(35)
934
$
$
The total operating lease expense included in selling, general and administrative costs was $651,000.
Note 6 - Accrued expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
Clinical trial and other development costs
Professional fees, listing and general corporate costs
People related costs
Total accrued expenses
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
21,336 $
919
1
22,256 $
8,607
2,149
107
10,863
F-14
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 - Warrants
In 2016, the Company issued 31,115,926 units to new and existing investors at the placing price of £1.4365 per unit.
Each unit comprised one ordinary share and one warrant. The warrant holders can subscribe for 0.4 of an ordinary
share at a per share exercise price of £1.7238 until May 2, 2022. The warrant holders can opt for a cashless exercise
of their warrants, whereby the warrant holders can choose to exchange the warrants held for a reduced number of
warrants exercisable at nil consideration. The reduced number of warrants is calculated based on a formula
considering the share price and the exercise price of the warrants.
At December 31, 2021, 31,003,155 warrants remain outstanding and entitle the investors to subscribe for, in
aggregate, a maximum of 12,401,262 ordinary shares.
If, after a transaction, should the warrants be exercisable for unlisted securities, the warrant holders may demand a
cash payment instead of the delivery of the underlying securities. Accordingly, the warrants are accounted for as a
liability under ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”.The warrants are measured at fair value, classified
as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, with movements recorded in finance income/(expense) in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
In the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, no warrants were exercised or forfeited.
The warrants had no intrinsic value as at December 31, 2021.
There have been no changes in valuation techniques or transfers between fair value measurement levels during the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes model and the table
below presents the assumptions used:
Shares potentially issued under warrants
Exercise price in pounds sterling
Risk-free interest rate
Expected term to exercise
Annualized volatility
Dividend rate
Calculated value of the warrants, in thousands of U.S. dollars
December 31,
2021
12,401,262
1.7238
£
2020
12,401,262
1.7238
£
0.07 %
0.33
51.6 %
— %
— %
1.33
105.4 %
— %
$
—
$
2,246
The following table shows the movement of the value of the warrants (in thousands):
At January 1
Fair value adjustment
Foreign exchange differences recognized in loss for the period
Translation differences recognized in other comprehensive loss
At December 31
December 31,
2021
2020
$
2,246 $
(2,246)
—
—
— $
$
1,188
1,114
22
(78)
2,246
For the amount recognized at December 31, 2021, the effect when the following parameter deviates up or down is
presented in the below table (in thousands):
10% volatility increase
Base case, reported fair value
10% volatility decrease
$
$
4
—
—
F-15
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 - Term loan
In November 2020, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Verona Pharma, Inc. (“Verona U.S.” and,
together with the company, the “Borrowers”) entered into a term loan facility of up to $30.0 million (the “Term
Loan”), consisting of term loan advances in an aggregate amount of $5.0 million funded at closing, a term loan
advance available subject to certain terms and conditions in an aggregate amount of $10.0 million (the “Term B
Loan”) and a term loan advance available subject to certain terms and conditions in an aggregate amount of
$15.0 million (the “Term C Loan”), with Silicon Valley Bank, a California corporation (“SVB”), the proceeds of
which will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
The Term Loan is governed by a loan and security agreement, dated as of November 19, 2020, between the
Borrowers and SVB, as amended (the “Loan Agreement”). The Term B Loan will be available, subject to and
customary terms and conditions, only during the period commencing upon the achievement of a specific clinical
milestone relating to ensifentrine through and including September 30, 2022. The Term C Loan will be available,
subject to customary terms and conditions, only during the period commencing upon the achievement of an
additional specific clinical milestone relating to ensifentrine through and including June 30, 2023.
The Term Loan will mature on November 1, 2024. Each advance under the Term Loan accrues interest at a floating
per annum rate equal to the greater of (a) the sum of the prime rate reported in The Wall Street Journal plus 1.00%
and (b) four and one-quarter of one percent (4.25%). The Term Loan provides for interest-only payments on a
monthly basis until the payment date immediately preceding December 1, 2023. Thereafter, amortization payments
will be payable monthly in equal installments of principal plus monthly payments of accrued interest. Upon
repayment (whether at maturity, upon acceleration or by prepayment or otherwise), the Borrowers shall make a final
payment to SVB in the amount of 10% of the aggregate Term Loans advanced (the "Final Payment"). The
Borrowers may prepay the Term Loan in full but not in part provided that the Borrowers (i) provide ten days’ prior
written notice to SVB, (ii) pays on the date of such prepayment (A) all outstanding principal plus accrued and
unpaid interest, (B) a prepayment fee of $450,000 plus 3.0% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid on or before the
first anniversary of the closing date; $300,000 plus 2.00% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid after the first
anniversary of the closing date and on or before the second anniversary of the closing date; and $150,000 plus
1.00% of the Term C Loans advanced if paid thereafter and prior to maturity, (C) the Final Payment and (D) all
other sums, if any, that shall become due and payable with respect to the Term Loan Advances, including interest at
the Default Rate with respect to any past due amounts. Amounts outstanding during an event of default are payable
upon SVB's demand and shall accrue interest at an additional rate of 3.0% per annum.
The Term Loan is secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers, other than the equity interests
of Verona U.S. and other than intellectual property, provided that such lien on substantially all assets includes any
rights to payments and proceeds from the sale, licensing or disposition of intellectual property. The Borrowers have
also granted SVB a negative pledge with respect to its intellectual property.
The Loan Agreement contains customary covenants and representations, including but not limited to financial
reporting obligations and limitations on dividends, indebtedness, collateral, investments, distributions, transfers,
mergers or acquisitions, taxes, corporate changes, deposit accounts, and subsidiaries. The Loan Agreement also
contains other customary provisions, such as expense reimbursement, non-disclosure obligations as well as
indemnification rights for the benefit of SVB. The Loan Agreement includes a minimum cash covenant triggered
when Borrowers' consolidated cash and cash equivalents drop below $45.0 million at any time after the earliest to
occur of any of the following: (i) the release of negative data from ENHANCE-2 and/or ENHANCE-1, which in the
reasonable business discretion Borrowers’ senior management, would be considered insufficient to support
submission of an NDA to the FDA, (ii) the FDA issues a complete response letter with respect to an NDA submitted
for ensifentrine, or (iii) failure to achieve a specific regulatory milestone relating to ensifentrine by June 30, 2023
(extendable to March 31, 2024 upon the Borrowers receiving a specified amount of new cash proceeds after
September 8, 2020 from the sale of equity securities in one or more public financings or other bona fide equity
financings, subordinated debt and/or upfront/milestone payments from one or more collaboration agreements not
prohibited in the Loan Agreement). Upon such trigger, Borrowers must cash collateralize an amount equal to the
outstanding obligations to SVB plus the amount of any prepayment penalty and Final Payment which would be due
in the event the Loan Agreement were prepaid in full with respect to the Term Loans advanced as of such time.
F-16
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The events of default under the Loan Agreement include, but are not limited to, the Borrowers’ failure to make any
payments of principal or interest under the Loan Agreement or other transaction documents, the Borrowers’ breach
or default in the performance of any covenant under the Loan Agreement or other transaction documents, the
occurrence of a material adverse change, any Borrower making a false or misleading representation or warranty in
any material respect under the Loan Agreement, any Borrower’s insolvency or bankruptcy, any attachment or
judgment on any Borrower’s assets of at least $500,000, or the occurrence of any default under any agreement or
obligation of any Borrower involving indebtedness in excess of $500,000. If an event of default occurs, SVB is
entitled to take enforcement action, including acceleration of amounts due under the Loan Agreement.
In connection with the Term Loan the Company incurred debt issuance costs totaling approximately $400 thousand
which were deducted from the carrying amount of the debt and are being amortized over the estimated term of the
debt using the effective interest method.
As of December 31, 2021, the carrying value of the Term Loan was approximately $4.9 million, of which all was
due in greater than 12 months. The debt balance has been categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The
carrying amount of the debt approximates its fair value based on prevailing interest rates as of the balance sheet date.
Note 9 - Significant agreements
Ligand agreement
See note 2 for Ligand agreement details.
Nuance agreement
The Company entered into a collaboration and license agreement (the “Nuance Agreement”) with Nuance Pharma
Limited (“Nuance Pharma”) effective June 9, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), under which the Company granted
Nuance Pharma the exclusive rights to develop and commercialize ensifentrine in Greater China (China, Taiwan,
Hong Kong and Macau). In return, the Company received an unconditional right to consideration aggregating
$40.0 million consisting of $25.0 million in cash and an equity interest, valued at $15.0 million as of the Effective
Date, in Nuance Biotech, the parent company of Nuance Pharma. The Company is eligible to receive future
milestone payments of up to $179.0 million triggered upon achievement of certain clinical, regulatory, and
commercial milestones, as well as tiered double-digit royalties as a percentage of net sales of the products in Greater
China. The Company will recognize these milestones when it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would
not occur.
As of December 31, 2021, the $25.0 million cash payment and $15.0 million equity interest had been received and
the holding in Nuance Biotech was recorded as Equity Interest on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
Equity Interest is recorded cost subject to impairment. As of December 31, 2021, there had been no transactions to
indicate any change in the value of Nuance Biotech’s stock, nor had there been any indications of impairment. The
Equity Interest is therefore recorded at a value of $15.0 million as of December 31, 2021.
Under the terms of the Nuance Agreement, at any time until three months prior to the expected submission of the
first New Drug Application in Greater China, if (i) a third party is interested in partnering with the Company, either
globally or in territory covering at least the United States or Europe, for the development and/or commercialization
of ensifentrine or (ii) the Company undergoes a change of control, the Company will have an exclusive option right
to buy back the license granted to Nuance Pharma and all related assets. The price is agreed to be equal to the
aggregate of (i) all prior amounts paid by Nuance Pharma to the Company in cash under the agreement and (ii) all
development and regulatory costs incurred and paid by Nuance Pharma in connection with the development and
commercialization of ensifentrine under the Nuance Agreement multiplied by a single-digit factor range dependent
upon achievement of certain milestones, subject to a specified maximum amount.
The Nuance Agreement will continue on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction and product-by-product basis until the
expiration of royalty payment obligations with respect to such product in such jurisdiction unless earlier terminated
by the parties. Either party may terminate the Nuance Agreement for an uncured material breach or bankruptcy of
the other party. Nuance Pharma may also terminate the Nuance Agreement at will upon 90 days' prior written notice.
The Company reviewed the buy-back option and determined that because it is conditional on a third party the
Company does not have the practical ability to exercise it and, accordingly, the contract is accounted for under ASC
606.
F-17
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The transaction price at the Effective Date of the Nuance Agreement was $40.0 million consisting of the
$25.0 million upfront cash payment and $15.0 million equity interest. Developmental and regulatory milestones, and
the manufacture and supply of ensifentrine drug product, were not included in the transaction price as management
determined that it is not probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not
occur. Commercial milestones and sales royalties were also excluded and will be recognized when the milestones
are achieved or the sales occur in Greater China.
The performance obligations in the Nuance Agreement include the grant of the license (including the right to
commercialize ensifentrine until the end of the term, the sharing of certain know how, and the sharing of certain
clinical and regulatory data), and manufacture and supply of ensifentrine drug product. The company have
determined that the manufacturing and supply was not at a discount.
The Company has determined that the license and the know how shared with Nuance Pharma constitutes functional
intellectual property and that revenue relating to this should be recognized at a point in time. Consequently, the
Company determined that it fulfilled its obligations to Nuance Pharma after it delivered the know how that will
allow Nuance Pharma to file an investigational new drug application in Greater China. This know how was
delivered in the year ended December 31, 2021, and the $40.0 million revenue was therefore recognized as revenue
in this period. Revenue relating to the manufacture and supply obligations will be recognized when the drug product
is delivered.
On the Effective Date, $4.0 million of costs of obtaining the contract were recorded as a contract asset. As of
December 31, 2021, the entire cost had been recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Subsequent to the Effective Date, Ligand notified the Company that it believes that Nuance Pharma is a sub-licensee
under the Ligand Agreement and that the Company is therefore under an obligation to make a sublicense payment to
Ligand equal to 25% of the $40.0 million upfront transaction price. The Company does not believe it has granted a
sublicense of or otherwise transferred to Nuance any Ligand intellectual property or know how and therefore the
Company believes that it is not under any obligation to pay the requested sum to Ligand.
Note 10 - Benefit plans
The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan in the U.S. and a defined contribution plan in
the U.K. for its employees and executive director. The assets of the plans are held separately from those of the
Company in independently administered funds.
The retirement plan cost charge represents the contributions payable by the Company to the plans during the year.
Defined contribution costs during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 amounted to $274 thousand and
$315 thousand, respectively.
F-18
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 11 - Taxation
Verona Pharma plc operates in the United Kingdom and Verona Pharma, Inc. in the United States and they are
subject to income taxes in those countries. U.K. corporation tax is charged at 19% and the U.S. Federal Income tax
rate is 21%.
The components of (profit)/loss before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
United States
United Kingdom
Total
The components of income tax expense are as follows (in thousands):
United States
United Kingdom
Total current tax (credit)/expense
United States
United Kingdom
Total deferred tax expense
Total income tax (credit)/expense
December 31,
2021
2020
(4,850) $
60,437
55,587 $
(3,191)
68,191
65,000
December 31,
2021
2020
(18) $
—
(18) $
—
—
—
(18) $
146
—
146
—
—
—
146
$
$
$
$
$
A reconciliation of the U.K. statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows (in percentages):
U.K. tax rate
Non-deductible expenses
Research and development incentive
Share options exercised
Change in deferred tax valuation allowance
Other differences
Effective income tax rate
December 31,
2021
2020
19.0 %
(7.5) %
(10.9) %
2.6 %
(3.0) %
(0.1) %
0.1 %
19.0 %
(8.9) %
(4.8) %
0.4 %
(5.9) %
— %
(0.2) %
F-19
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred tax liabilities:
Contingent liability (1)
Total deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating losses
IPR&D asset (1)
Future exercisable shares
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Less: valuation allowance
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
Movements in the deferred tax valuation allowance
Valuation allowance at January 1
Change in tax rates
(Decrease)/increase in valuation allowance
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Valuation allowance at December 31
December 31,
2021
2020
$
(8,903) $
(8,903)
(5,860)
(5,860)
26,931
7,992
4,228
4
39,155
(30,252)
— $
19,855
5,631
10,480
215
36,181
(30,321)
—
30,321 $
7,353
(7,422)
—
30,252 $
13,504
1,632
14,815
370
30,321
$
$
$
(1) These relate to the difference in the tax base of the IP R&D asset and assumed contingent liability and the
financial reporting base, which is nil under US GAAP.
Management has reviewed cumulative tax losses and projections of future taxable losses and determined that it is
not more likely than not that they will be realized. Accordingly, valuation allowances have been provided over
deferred tax assets
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had U.K. net operating losses (“NOLs”) of
$104.3 million and $95.7 million, respectively. The NOLs can be carried forward indefinitely to be offset against
future taxable profits, but this is restricted to an annual £5 million allowance after which there will be a 50%
restriction in the profits that can be covered by losses brought forward.
The Company files separate income tax returns in the U.K. and the U.S. All necessary income tax filings have been
completed for all years up to and including December 31, 2020, and there are no ongoing tax examinations in any
jurisdiction. No interest or penalties were recognized in the consolidated statements of operations or consolidated
balance sheets. As of December 31, 2021, the Company has no uncertain tax positions.
F-20
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 12 - Share-based compensation
The Company operates various share based incentive plans for its staff and issues ordinary shares or ADSs when
share-based awards are exercised.
The Company records share-based compensation expense related to share options and RSUs granted to employees
and directors. The expense is included in R&D and general and administrative costs, based on the nature of
individual employees’ functions, and represents the relevant year's allocation of the expense. The costs of share-
based compensation to employees are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
loss, together with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period.
Options are issued with an exercise price of the market price on the day of grant and generally vest over a period of
one to four years and the contractual life of all options is ten years.
The following table shows the allocation of share-based compensation between R&D and selling, general and
administrative costs (in thousands):
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Total share-based compensation
EMI Option Plan and Pre-IPO Option Plan
December 31,
2021
2020
$
9,654 $
9,319
15,771
12,858
$
25,425 $
22,177
The EMI Option Plan and the Pre-IPO Option Plan were adopted by our board of directors on September 18, 2006,
and July 24, 2012, respectively. The total number of shares that may be issued under these plans is the current
number of outstanding options over 114,000 ordinary shares, or 14,250 ADSs, for the EMI Option Plan and
1,860,000 ordinary shares, or 232,500 ADSs, for the Pre-IPO Option Plan.
No further awards have been granted since the 2017 Incentive Plan was adopted, and no further awards will be
granted under them.
2017 Incentive Plan
The 2017 Incentive Plan was adopted by our board of directors and became effective on April 26, 2017, in order to
grant share based compensation to certain of the Company’s directors and employees. It provides for the grant of
stock options, RSUs, and other share-based awards to Company’s directors, officers, employees and non-employee
directors.
In the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company modified the terms of all RSUs issued prior to January 1, 2019
to include a market based condition, which was also included in the terms of RSUs issued during 2019. The
Company's stock price must be maintained above the equivalent of £2 per ordinary share for thirty days for the
RSUs to vest, in addition to the existing service condition. The RSUs vest five years after the date of grant
irrespective of whether the £2 market condition was met. This modification did not result in an increase in the fair
value of the RSUs.
F-21
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Share option activity
The number of options, the weighted average grant date fair value per stock option, and the weighted average
exercise price are all shown below on a per ordinary shares basis. The Company’s ADSs that are listed on the
Nasdaq Global Market each represent eight ordinary shares.
The following table shows share option activity and includes the options outstanding from all three plans :
Number of
share options
outstanding
Weighted
average
exercise price
(1)
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
Aggregate
intrinsic value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020
Granted
Forfeited
Expired
Exercised
Outstanding at December 31, 2020
Granted
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
Exercisable at December 31, 2021
14,179,196 $
2,096,285
(2,506,017)
(589,128)
(54,664)
13,125,672 $
1,696,000
(2,126,472)
12,695,200 $
10,177,240 $
1.53
0.73
1.53
1.93
0.75
1.41
0.72
1.06
1.38
1.53
7.3 $
914
6.5 $
6.1 $
950
553
(1) The exercise prices relate to the equivalent price for an ordinary share, calculated as one eighth of the ADS price.
Determining the fair value of share options and RSUs
The total fair values of the options and RSUs were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for
equity-settled compensation, amounted to $3.1 million for instruments granted in the year ended December 31, 2021
(2020: $62.1 million). The cost is amortized over the vesting period of the options and RSUs on a straight-line basis
using the cliff-vesting method.The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of share
options granted in 2021 and 2020.
Expected volatility
Volatility is calculated using historical weekly averages of the Company's share price over a period that is in line
with the expected life of the options and RSUs.
Fair value of ordinary shares.
The fair value of ordinary shares has been based on the share price of the Company’s shares on AIM on the evening
before the date of grant up until October 20, 2020 when the company delisted from AIM. Post this the fair value has
been based on the ADS’s traded on NASDAQ on the evening before the date of grant.
Risk-free interest rate
The risk-free interest rate has been based on U.K. Government debt yield for the relevant term at the time of grant
up until October 20, 2020 when the company delisted from AIM. After this appropriate U.S Treasury yield rates
were used.
Expected term.
The expected term is determined using the simplified method.
Expected dividend
There are no expected dividends.
F-22
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of the weighted-average assumptions applicable to the share options granted in the applicable years is as
follows:
Risk-free interest rate
Expected lives, years
Expected volatility
Expected dividend yield
Grant date fair value (per share)
Restricted stock units activity
The following table shows RSU activity:
Outstanding at January 1, 2020
Granted
Forfeited
Vested
Outstanding at December 31, 2020
Granted
Forfeited
Vested
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
RSUs subject to time based vesting
RSUs subject to milestone based vesting
December 31,
2021
2020
0.79% -
1.32% 0% -0.21%
5-7
5-7
85.35% -
87.68%
65.83% -
75.40%
— %
$0.62 -
$0.78
— %
$0.40 -
$0.62
Number of
RSUs
outstanding
1,602,969
62,566,271
(84,920)
(2,091,960)
61,992,360
3,030,928
(2,002,584)
(24,673,352)
38,347,352
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
1.5
1.2
Number of
RSUs
outstanding
37,833,688
513,664
Weighted
average
remaining
vesting Period
1.2
0.2
Period in
which the
target must be
achieved
n/a
2022 - 2024
The intrinsic and fair value of RSUs that vested in the year ended December 31, 2021, was $20.2 million (2020:
$1.5 million).
As of December 31, 2021, total compensation cost related to share options and RSUs granted but not yet recognized
was $16.2 million. This cost will be amortized to expense over a weighted average remaining period of 1.5 years and
will be adjusted for subsequent forfeitures.
F-23
Verona Pharma plc
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 - Net loss per share
Net loss per share is calculated on an ordinary share basis. The Company’s ADSs that are listed on the Nasdaq
Global Market each represent eight ordinary shares. The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for 2021 and 2020 (net loss in thousands, loss per share in dollars):
Numerator:
Net loss
Net loss available to ordinary shareholders - basic and diluted
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
(55,569) $
(55,569) $
(65,146)
(65,146)
473,188,457
$
(0.12) $
262,932,653
(0.25)
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, outstanding share options, RSUs and warrants of 63,443,814
and 87,519,294, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per ordinary share, because
to do so would be antidilutive.
Note 14 - Related party transactions and other shareholder matters
In the year ended December 31, 2021, there were no related party transactions.
In the year ended December 31, 2020, certain directors and officers participated in the Private Placement,
summarized below:
Participation in Private Placement
Dr. Ebsworth
Dr. Zaccardelli
Mr. Sinha (through connected persons)
Dr. Ullman
Dr. Edwards
Mr. Hahn
Ordinary Shares
Consideration
222,216 £
444,440 $
533,328 $
266,664 $
53,328 $
177,784 $
100,000
249,998
299,997
149,983
29,997
100,004
F-24