2021
Annual
Report
Proxy Statement
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Due to on-going public health concerns related to the
COVID-19 pandemic, we will be holding a virtual Annual
Meeting. You may access and participate in the virtual
Annual Meeting using your control number,
including
asking questions, examining the list of
registered
stockholders and voting shares, if you were a stockholder
of record as of the close of business on the record date or
held shares through a bank, broker, or nominee on that
date.
Virtual Meeting Date:
Tuesday, May 10, 2022
Virtual Meeting Time:
11:00 a.m. Central Time
Virtual Meeting Location:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/WM2022
Record Date:
March 15, 2022
Agenda for the Annual Meeting (or any adjournment
or postponement thereof):
• To elect the nine nominees named in the attached proxy
statement to our Board of Directors;
• To vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022;
• To vote on a non-binding, advisory proposal to approve
our executive compensation;
• To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding a civil rights
audit, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
• To conduct other business that is properly raised at the
meeting.
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY
OF PROXY MATERIALS:
This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement
and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2021 are available on
the “Investors” website at www.wm.com.
in
accordance with
You may submit your proxy via the Internet
by following the instructions provided in the
Notice or, if you received printed copies of
the proxy materials, on your proxy card.
the
If you received printed copies of
materials
the
instructions in the Notice, you also have the
option to submit your proxy by telephone by
calling the toll-free number listed on your
proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24
hours per day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, on May 9, 2022.
If you received printed copies of the proxy
materials
the
instructions in the Notice and would like to
submit your proxy by mail, please mark,
sign and date your proxy card and return it
promptly in the postage-paid envelope
provided.
accordance with
in
If your shares of Common Stock are held in street name,
you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or
nominee that you must follow in order to have your
shares of Common Stock voted at the Annual Meeting.
Your vote is important. We urge all stockholders — whether attending the virtual Annual Meeting or not — to vote
and submit their proxies as soon as possible using one of the methods described above.
Enroll in Electronic Delivery Today. Help us save paper, time and money! If you are
a beneficial owner, visit http://www.proxyvote.com or follow the instructions on
the Notice, proxy card or voting instructions. All stockholders may also enroll at
https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/wmi.
Courtney A. Tippy
Corporate Secretary
March 29, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOARD OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nominees for Director
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leadership Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Independence of Board Members . . . . . . . . . .
Meetings and Board Committees . . . . . . . . . .
Role in Risk Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oversight of ESG Risk and Performance . . . . .
Audit Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit Committee Report
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management Development and Compensation
Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee Report . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nominating and Governance Committee . . . . .
Related Party Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Board of Directors Governing Documents . . . .
Non-Employee Director Compensation . . . . . .
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (Item 1 on the Proxy
Card)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER STOCK OWNERSHIP . .
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS . . . . . . .
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . .
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 Pay-For Performance . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consideration of Stockholder Advisory
Vote . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2022 Compensation Program Preview . . . . .
Page
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
8
9
10
10
11
11
12
13
13
15
20
21
21
22
23
23
23
23
24
26
26
Our Compensation Philosophy for Named
Executive Officers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Overview of Elements of Our 2021
Compensation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . .
How Named Executive Officer Compensation
Decisions are Made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Named Executives’ 2021 Compensation
Program and Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Post-Employment and Change in Control
Compensation; Clawback Policies . . . . . .
Other Compensation Policies and
Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation Tables . . . . . . . . . .
Summary Compensation Table . . . . . . . . . .
Grant of Plan-Based Awards in 2021 . . . . . .
Outstanding Equity Awards as of
December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Option Exercises and Stock Vested . . . . . . .
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in
2021. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potential Consideration Upon Termination of
Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio . . . . . . . . .
Equity Compensation Plan Table . . . . . . . . .
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (Item 2 on the
Proxy Card)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION (Item 3 on the Proxy Card) . .
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL (Item 4 on the
Proxy Card)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
26
27
28
32
36
37
39
39
41
42
43
44
45
47
48
48
49
50
51
52
PROXY STATEMENT
Waste Management, Inc. is a holding company, and all operations are conducted by its subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries are
operated and managed locally and focus on providing services in distinct geographic areas. Through our subsidiaries, we
are North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, providing services
throughout the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. We partner with our residential, commercial, industrial and municipal
customers and the communities we serve to manage and reduce waste at each stage from collection to disposal, while
recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy.
Our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any postponement or
adjournment of the meeting. We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet. On
March 29, 2022, we sent an electronic notice of how to access our proxy materials and our Annual Report to stockholders
that have previously signed up to receive their proxy materials via the Internet. On March 29, 2022, we began mailing a
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to those stockholders that previously have not signed up for electronic
delivery. The Notice contains instructions on how stockholders can access our proxy materials on the website referred to
in the Notice or request that a printed set of the proxy materials be sent to them.
Enroll in Electronic Delivery Today! We encourage stockholders to elect to receive all future proxy materials
electronically, which is free, fast, convenient, environmentally friendly and helps lower our printing and postage costs. If
you are a beneficial owner, visit http://www.proxyvote.com or follow the instructions on your Notice, proxy card or voting
instructions. All stockholders may also enroll at https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/wmi. Thank you for supporting our
sustainability mission.
Record Date March 15, 2022.
Quorum The holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date must be present in
person or by proxy.
Shares Outstanding There were 415,159,816 shares of our Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of
March 15, 2022.
Attending the Meeting Due to on-going public health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we will be holding a
virtual Annual Meeting. If you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the record date or held shares
through a bank, broker, or nominee on that date, you are entitled to access and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting,
including asking questions, examining the list of registered stockholders and voting shares. To attend the virtual Annual
Meeting, you must use the link provided and enter the 16-digit control number found on your Notice, proxy card, or voting
instructions. If you do not have your 16-digit control number, you will be admitted to the virtual Annual Meeting as a
guest, but you will not have the ability to vote your shares or ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting. If you are a
beneficial owner, you may contact the bank, broker or other institution where you hold your account if you have questions
about obtaining your control number. We encourage you to access the virtual Annual Meeting before it begins. Online
check-in will start approximately fifteen minutes before the meeting on May 10, 2022. If you have difficulty accessing the
meeting, a phone number for technical support will be available at the virtual Annual Meeting web address on the day of
the meeting.
Virtual Annual Meeting Web Address www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/WM2022
Submitting Your Proxy Internet, phone, or mail.
Voting and Asking Questions at the Meeting Stockholders can vote and ask questions during the virtual Annual Meeting
by following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting. Questions relevant to the business of
the Company or the Annual Meeting may be submitted in a field provided by the virtual meeting platform. An audio
recording of the virtual Annual Meeting, including the question and answer segment, will be available on the “Investors”
website at www.wm.com after the meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, it is important
that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Please read the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and this Proxy Statement with care and follow the voting instructions to ensure that your shares are
represented at the Annual Meeting.
2022 Proxy Statement | 1
PROXY STATEMENT
Changing Your Vote Stockholders of record may revoke their proxy at any time before we vote it at the meeting by
submitting a later-dated proxy via the Internet, by telephone, by mail, by delivering instructions to our Corporate Secretary
before the Annual Meeting revoking the proxy or by voting during the virtual Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual
Meeting, by itself, will not revoke a proxy. If you hold shares through a bank or brokerage firm, you may revoke any prior
voting instructions by contacting that firm.
Votes Required to Adopt Proposals Each share of our Common Stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one
vote on each of the nine director nominees and one vote on each other matter. To be elected, a director must receive a
majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election at the meeting. This means that the number of shares
voted “for” a director must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director. Each of the other proposals
requires the favorable vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock present, either by
proxy or in person, and entitled to vote on the matter.
Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors. For each of
the other proposals, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against these matters because they are considered
present and entitled to vote on the matters.
If your shares are held by a broker, you may submit your voting instructions to the broker as to how you want your shares
to be voted. If you give the broker instructions, your shares must be voted as you direct. If you do not give voting
instructions for the proposal to ratify selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the
broker may vote your shares at its discretion. However, with respect to the election of directors, the advisory vote on
executive compensation and the stockholder proposal, the broker cannot vote your shares without instructions from you;
when this happens, it is called a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes are counted in determining the presence of a
quorum at the meeting, but they have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote
on executive compensation or the stockholder proposal.
Voting Instructions You may receive more than one proxy card depending on how you hold your shares. If you hold
shares through a broker, your ability to submit your voting instructions by phone or over the Internet depends on your
broker’s voting process. You should complete and return each proxy or other voting instruction request provided to you.
If you complete and submit your proxy voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will follow your instructions. If
you submit your proxy but do not give voting instructions, we will vote your shares in accordance with the
recommendation of the Board on each of the proposals as set forth below. If you give us your proxy, your shares will be
voted at the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
Item
Matter
Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal year 2022
1 Election of Director Nominees set forth in this Proxy Statement
2 Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s Independent
3 Approve the Company’s Executive Compensation
4 Stockholder Proposal Regarding a Civil Rights Audit
Board Vote
Recommendation
FOR each director
nominee
FOR
FOR
AGAINST
Stockholder Proposals and Nominees for the 2023 Annual Meeting The Company will not consider any proposal or
nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the Company’s By-law and Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) requirements for submitting a proposal or nomination. We also ask that you email a courtesy copy of any notice
to GCLegal@wm.com. A copy of our By-laws may be obtained free of charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary and is
available in the “ESG — Corporate Governance” section of the “Investors” page on our website at www.wm.com.
2 |
2022 Proxy Statement
PROXY STATEMENT
Stockholder Proposals: Eligible stockholders who wish to submit a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement pursuant
to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) for our 2023 Annual Meeting
must submit their proposal to our Corporate Secretary at Waste Management, Inc., 800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000,
Houston, Texas 77002 for receipt on or before November 29, 2022. The proponent and the proposal must comply with the
requirements set forth in the federal securities laws, including Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, in order to be included in
the Company’s proxy statement and proxy card for the 2023 Annual Meeting.
Advance Notice Proposals and Nominations: In addition, the Company’s By-laws establish advance notice procedures that
must be complied with for stockholders to bring proposals that are not included in the Company’s proxy materials and
nominations of persons for election as directors (other than pursuant to our proxy access By-law discussed below)
before an annual meeting of stockholders. In accordance with our By-laws, for a proposal or nominee not included in our
proxy materials to be properly brought before the 2023 Annual Meeting, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to our
Corporate Secretary at Waste Management, Inc., 800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002 no earlier than
December 11, 2022 and no later than January 10, 2023 and must contain the information specified in the Company’s
By-laws. In addition to satisfying the foregoing advance notice requirements under our By-laws, to comply with the
universal proxy rules under the Exchange Act (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of
director nominees other than Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by
Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 11, 2023.
Proxy Access Nominations: The Company’s By-laws permit a stockholder or group of up to 20 stockholders owning 3% or
more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in the
Company’s proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of 20% of the Board of Directors or two
individuals, provided the stockholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the Company’s By-laws.
Notice of proxy access director nominees must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary at Waste Management, Inc.,
800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002 no earlier than October 30, 2022, and no later than November 29,
2022, together with other information required by the Company’s By-laws.
Expenses of Solicitation We pay the cost of preparing, assembling and mailing this proxy-soliciting material. In addition
to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by Internet or telephone, or by Waste Management officers and
employees of the Company’s subsidiaries without additional compensation. We pay all costs of solicitation, including
certain expenses of brokers and nominees who mail proxy materials to their customers or principals. Also, Innisfree
M&A Incorporated has been hired to help in the solicitation of proxies for the 2022 Annual Meeting for a fee of $15,000
plus associated costs and expenses.
Annual Report A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, which includes our
financial statements for fiscal year 2021, is included with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report on Form 10-K is not
incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or deemed to be a part of the materials for the solicitation of proxies.
Householding Information We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this
procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery
of proxy materials will receive only one copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report unless we are notified that one or
more of these individuals wishes to receive separate copies. This procedure helps reduce our printing costs and postage
fees.
If you wish to receive a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report, please contact: Waste Management,
Inc., Corporate Secretary, 800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002, telephone 713-512-6200.
If you do not wish to participate in householding in the future and prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy materials,
please contact: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Attention Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood,
NY 11717, telephone 1-866-540-7095. If you are currently receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and wish to
receive only one copy for your household, please contact Broadridge.
2022 Proxy Statement | 3
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors has nine members. Each member of our Board is elected annually.
Nominees for Director
Committee
Management
Development &
Compensation
Nominating &
Governance
C
C
Name
Age
Tenure
Independent
Audit
59
64
64
62
53
63
72
56
74
2016 – Present
2015 – Present
2013 – Present
2015 – Present
2021 – Present
2019 – Present
1997 – Present
2021 – Present
2005 – Present
James C. Fish, Jr.
Andrés R. Gluski
Victoria M. Holt
Kathleen M. Mazzarella
Sean E. Menke
William B. Plummer
John C. Pope
Maryrose T. Sylvester
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Chair C
Member
Leadership Structure
C
Mr. Thomas H. Weidemeyer has served as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since May 2018 and presides over
all meetings of the Board, including executive sessions that only non-employee directors attend. Stockholders and
interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board or the non-employee directors should address their
communications to Mr. Thomas H. Weidemeyer, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, c/o Waste Management, Inc., P.O.
Box 53569, Houston, Texas 77052-3569.
We separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer at our Company in 2004. We believe that
having a Non-Executive Chairman of the Board is in the best interests of the Company and stockholders, due in part to the
ever-increasing demands made on boards of directors under federal securities laws, national stock exchange rules and
other federal and state regulations. The separation of the positions allows our Chairman of the Board to focus on
management of Board matters and allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus his attention on managing our business.
Additionally, we believe the separation of those roles contributes to the independence of the Board in its oversight role
and in assessing the Chief Executive Officer and management generally. The Non-Executive Chairman’s responsibilities
include leading full Board meetings and executive sessions and managing the Board function. The Board elected
Mr. Weidemeyer to serve as Chairman of the Board due to his many years as a valuable member of our Board, his
experience serving on boards of other large public companies and his extensive operational and leadership experience.
Mr. Weidemeyer also serves on all three Board committees.
4 |
2022 Proxy Statement
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Independence of Board Members
The Board of Directors has determined that each of the following eight non-employee director nominees are independent
in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards: Andrés R. Gluski, Victoria M. Holt, Kathleen M.
Mazzarella, Sean E. Menke, William B. Plummer, John C. Pope, Maryrose T. Sylvester and Thomas H. Weidemeyer.
James C. Fish, Jr., our President and Chief Executive Officer, is also a director of the Company. As an employee of the
Company, Mr. Fish is not an “independent” director.
To assist the Board in determining independence, the Board of Directors adopted categorical standards of director
independence, which meet or exceed the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. These standards specify certain
relationships that are prohibited in order for the non-employee director to be deemed independent. The categorical
standards our Board uses in determining independence are included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can
be found on our website. In addition to these categorical standards, our Board makes a subjective determination of
independence considering relevant facts and circumstances.
The Board reviewed all commercial and non-profit affiliations of each non-employee director and the dollar amount of all
transactions between the Company and each entity with which a non-employee director is affiliated to determine
independence. These transactions consisted of the Company, through its subsidiaries, providing waste management
services in the ordinary course of business and the Company’s subsidiaries purchasing goods and services in the ordinary
course of business and included commercial dealings with Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Sabre Corporation and The
AES Corporation. Ms. Mazzarella, Mr. Menke and Mr. Gluski, respectively, serve as chief executive officer of these entities.
The Board concluded there are no transactions between the Company and any entity with which a non-employee director
is affiliated that (a) are prohibited by our categorical standards of independence, (b) are material individually or in the
aggregate or (c) give rise to a material direct or indirect interest for that non-employee director. Accordingly, the Board
has determined that each non-employee director candidate meets the categorical standards of independence and that
there are no relationships that would affect independence.
Meetings and Board Committees
Last year the Board held seven regular meetings and one special meeting, and each committee of the Board met
independently as set forth below. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees
on which he or she served. In addition, all directors attended the 2021 virtual Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We do not
have a formal policy, but it has been longstanding practice that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders
unless there are unavoidable schedule conflicts or unforeseen circumstances.
The Board appoints committees to help carry out its duties. Committee members take on greater responsibility for key
issues. All members of the Board are invited to attend, and do generally attend, all committee meetings. The committees
review meeting results and recommendations with the full Board. The Board has three separate standing committees:
the Audit Committee; the Management Development and Compensation Committee (the “MD&C Committee”); and the
Nominating and Governance Committee. Additionally, the Board has the power to appoint additional committees, as it
deems necessary.
Role in Risk Oversight
Our executive officers have primary responsibility for risk management within our Company. Our Board of Directors
oversees risk management to ensure that the processes designed, implemented and maintained by our executives are
functioning as intended and adapted when necessary to respond to changes in our Company’s strategy as well as
emerging risks. The primary means by which our Board oversees our risk management processes is through its regular
communications with management and by regularly reviewing our enterprise risk management, or ERM, framework. We
believe that our leadership team’s engagement and communication methods are supportive of comprehensive risk
management practices and that our Board’s involvement is appropriate to ensure effective oversight.
Our ERM process is supported by regular inquiries of our Company’s Senior Leadership Team, and additional members
of management and operations leadership across the enterprise, as to the risks, including emerging risks, that may
affect the execution of our strategic priorities or achievement of our long-term outlook. For the most significant risks, the
ERM process is designed to generate actionable insights that are actively discussed and reviewed with the Senior
Leadership Team and our Board. Risks and opportunities are assessed and then prioritized using internal evaluations of
2022 Proxy Statement | 5
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
financial impact, likelihood of occurrence, outlook for changes in the nature or extent of risk exposure and a self-
assessment of the Company’s confidence in existing risk mitigation efforts. The Senior Leadership Team reviews the
outcomes of the risk assessments, focusing largely on the estimated scope of impacts, as well as the adequacy of
current support by internal staff, the sufficiency of financial support for mitigation measures needed to manage and
reduce risk, and the sufficiency of any third-party expertise that may be necessary to supplement internal resources. All
significant risks have a standardized scorecard that includes forward-looking action plans with measurable indicators
and progress updates on action plans from previous assessments.
At quarterly Audit Committee meetings, management provides an ERM report and regularly provides an in depth update
on specific risk topics. Additionally, risks related to our strategy, operations and financial results are also addressed in
our Board meetings. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Legal Officer, Chief People Officer and Chief Sustainability Officer report to our Board and Audit Committee at these
meetings, and other members of management periodically attend and present information, including those responsible
for our Internal Audit and Controls, Environmental Audit, Business Ethics and Compliance, People, Government Affairs,
Digital, Insurance, Safety, Finance and Accounting functions. These presentations allow our directors to have direct
communication with management and assess management’s evaluation and administration of the Company’s risk profile
through our ERM process. Examples of key areas of assessment addressed by our ERM process and overseen by our
Audit Committee and Board include the following: industry disruption; revenue management; legal and regulatory; capital
allocation; supply chain management; service to customers; cost discipline; physical infrastructure; brand management;
environmental, health & safety; human capital; information security and privacy; technology and currency, interest rate
and commodity risk management. Additionally, in accordance with New York Stock Exchange requirements, the Audit
Committee is responsible for discussing our major financial risk exposures, steps management has taken to monitor and
control such exposures and the Company’s process for risk assessment and management, and quarterly reports are
made to the Audit Committee on financial and compliance risks.
Management is encouraged to communicate with our directors with respect to any issues or developments that may
require consideration between regularly scheduled Board meetings, and members of management are regularly in
direct contact with our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and our committee chairs. Our Non-Executive Chairman of
the Board also facilitates communications with our Board of Directors as a whole and is integral in initiating the
discussions among the independent directors necessary to ensure management is adequately evaluating and overseeing
risks to our Company.
Oversight of ESG Risk and Performance
As North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, sustainability and
environmental stewardship is embedded in all that we do. We have enabled a people-first, technology-led focus to drive
our mission, that we are always working for a sustainable tomorrow. As a result, it would not be effective, or possible, to
assign responsibility for oversight of our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) risk and performance to any one
committee of our Board of Directors. Rather, various aspects of ESG, which are already organically a part of our Board
and committees’ oversight of our performance, risk management and strategic vision, are addressed in different
committees and with our full Board of Directors, as appropriate depending on the subject matter. Additionally, following
the appointment of Ms. Tara Hemmer as the Company’s first Senior Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer, the
Board of Directors now receives a quarterly ESG dashboard to highlight critical focus areas and track progress toward
ESG goals.
Our Board has a dedicated annual strategic planning session with our Senior Leadership Team and receives focused
strategic updates quarterly. Given the nature of our business, those sessions will address topics such as our people,
sustainable operations, waste diversion, recycling business improvements, potentially disruptive technologies and
environmental impacts, risks and opportunities. In 2021, the Board received several dedicated strategy updates regarding
ESG topics, including our sustainability growth strategy, progress and trends, goal setting, our people-first strategy, and
employee retention. Additionally, reflective of the importance of inclusion, equity and diversity and safety to our
organization, the full Board of Directors receives annual in-depth reports on leadership, workforce and supplier diversity,
as well as quarterly safety performance updates and a detailed annual healthy and safety report. Through these reports
and our ESG dashboard, our Board directly oversees our progress toward ESG goals.
Our Audit Committee also plays a significant role in oversight of ESG risk and performance. As discussed above, our
Audit Committee receives regular ERM updates with in depth discussion on specific risk topics. At least annually, one of
6 |
2022 Proxy Statement
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
the in depth dsicussions will look at an aspect of ESG risk. Additionally, the Audit Committee receives quarterly reports
on our compliance programs, including ethics and environmental and safety audit, with an annual in depth review of our
compliance programs. Our Audit Committee also has responsibility for oversight of information and cyber security and
assessment of cyber threats and defenses. Our Audit Committee receives reports from our Digital organization at least
twice a year. Topics historically covered in such reports include third-party evaluation of our technology infrastructure
and information security management system against the industry-standard NIST (National Institute of Standards and
Technology) cybersecurity framework; risk mitigation through the Company’s enterprise-wide cyber security training,
including our Board of Directors, conducted at least annually, regular simulated phishing tests and third-party penetration
testing; review of the Company’s cyber incident insurance coverage and external cyber incident resources; review of the
Company’s incident response plan and consideration of applicable laws and regulations, including those related to
privacy.
Additional areas of ESG oversight managed by our MD&C Committee include review of employee health, welfare and
benefit programs and compensation plan risk assessment. The Committee also engages in quarterly sessions with our
President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer regarding talent development
and succession planning at several levels of our organization. A critical component of these talent development and
succession planning efforts is the recognition that inclusion, equity and diversity are fundamental Company values.
Recognizing the importance of social justice, our People programs overseen by our MD&C Committee embrace and
cultivate respect, trust, open communication and diversity of thought and people.
Strong and effective corporate governance is established and overseen by our Nominating & Governance Committee.
The Committee leads the process for annual Board, committee and director evaluations and is responsible for review
and recommendation of Board and committee composition and leadership. In connection with performing this vital
function, the Nominating & Governance Committee reviews the skills, expertise and qualifications of our existing directors,
as well as potential external candidates, and considers matters such as inclusion and diversity, tenure and Board
refreshment. These efforts deliver on the Nominating & Governance Committee’s purpose to identify and nominate the
best possible candidates to guide and support the Company’s strategy and its commitment to serve and care for our
customers, the environment, the communities in which we work and our stockholders. Please see the discussion of the
Nominating and Governance Committee below for more information on this robust process.
For additional information about the topics discussed above, including ESG goals, metrics and progress, we encourage
stockholders to review our 2021 Sustainability Report at https://sustainability.wm.com. Our 2021 Sustainability Report
does not constitute a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement or any report filed with the
SEC.
2022 Proxy Statement | 7
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Number of Meetings Held in 2021: 8
Sean E. Menke
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Members:
William B. Plummer, Chairman
Andrés R. Gluski
Victoria M. Holt
Mr. Plummer has been the Chairman of our Audit Committee since May 2020. Each member of our Audit Committee
satisfies the additional New York Stock Exchange independence standards for audit committees set forth in Section 10A
of the Exchange Act. Our Board of Directors has determined that Audit Committee Chairman Mr. Plummer, Mr. Gluski,
Ms. Holt and Mr. Menke are audit committee financial experts as defined by the SEC based on a thorough review of their
education and financial and public company experience. Additional information regarding our directors’ expertise and
qualifications is available under “Election of Directors” below.
Key Functions
The Audit Committee’s duties are set forth in a written charter that was approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of the
charter can be found on our website. The Audit Committee generally is responsible for overseeing all matters relating to
our financial statements and reporting, independent auditors and internal audit function. As part of its function, the
Audit Committee reports the results of all of its reviews to the full Board. In fulfilling its duties, the Audit Committee, has
the following responsibilities:
Administrative Responsibilities
• Report to the Board, at least annually, all public company audit committee memberships by members of the Audit
Committee;
• Perform an annual review of its performance relative to its charter and report the results of its evaluation to the full
Board; and
• Adopt an orientation program for new Audit Committee members.
Financial Statements
• Review financial statements and Forms 10-K and 10-Q with management and the independent auditor;
• Review all earnings press releases and discuss with management the type of earnings guidance that we provide to
analysts and rating agencies;
• Discuss with the independent auditor any material changes to our accounting principles and matters required to be
communicated by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Auditing Standard No. 1301
Communications with Audit Committees;
• Review our financial reporting, accounting and auditing practices with management, the independent auditor and our
internal auditors;
• Review management’s and the independent auditor’s assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting; and
• Review executive officer certifications related to our reports and filings.
Independent Auditor
• Engage an independent auditor, determine the auditor’s compensation and replace the auditor if necessary;
• Review the independence of the independent auditor and establish our policies for hiring current or former employees
of the independent auditor;
• Evaluate the lead partner of our independent audit team and review a report, at least annually, describing the
independent auditor’s internal control procedures; and
• Pre-approve all services, including non-audit engagements, provided by the independent auditor.
Internal Audit
• Review the plans, staffing, reports and activities of the internal auditors; and
• Review and establish procedures for receiving, retaining and handling complaints, including anonymous complaints
by our employees, regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters.
8 |
2022 Proxy Statement
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The role of the Audit Committee is, among other things, to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf
of the Board of Directors, to recommend to the Board whether the Company’s financial statements should be included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and to select the independent auditor for ratification by stockholders.
Company management is responsible for the Company’s financial statements as well as for its financial reporting
process, accounting principles and internal controls. The Company’s independent auditors are responsible for
performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such
financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2021 with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, and has taken the
following steps in making its recommendation that the Company’s financial statements be included in its annual report:
• First, the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year 2021, those matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and the SEC, including information regarding the scope and
results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing
the financial reporting and disclosure process.
• Second, the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence and received from Ernst & Young
LLP a letter concerning independence as required under applicable independence standards for auditors of public
companies. This discussion and disclosure helped the Audit Committee in evaluating such independence. The Audit
Committee also considered whether the provision of other non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the
auditor’s independence.
• Third, the Audit Committee met periodically with members of management, the internal auditors and Ernst & Young
LLP to review and discuss internal controls over financial reporting. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed and
discussed management’s report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, as well as Ernst
& Young LLP’s report regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
• Finally, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed, with the Company’s management and Ernst & Young LLP, the
Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021, and consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in equity for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, including the
quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the
clarity of the disclosure.
The Committee has also discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and independent registered public accounting
firm the overall scope and plans of their respective audits. The Committee meets periodically with both the internal
auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the
results of their examinations and their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
The members of the Audit Committee are not engaged in the accounting or auditing profession and, consequently, are
not experts in matters involving auditing or accounting. In the performance of their oversight function, the members of
the Audit Committee necessarily relied upon the information, opinions, reports and statements presented to them by
Company management and by the independent registered public accounting firm.
Based on the reviews and discussions explained above (and without other independent verification), the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board (and the Board approved) that the Company’s financial statements be included in its annual
report for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. The Committee has also approved the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
William B. Plummer, Chairman
Andrés R. Gluski
Victoria M. Holt
Sean E. Menke
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
2022 Proxy Statement | 9
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Members:
Andrés R. Gluski, Chairman
Kathleen M. Mazzarella
William B. Plummer
Mr. Gluski has served as the Chairman of our MD&C Committee since May 2021. Each member of our MD&C Committee
is independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange.
Key Functions
John C. Pope
Maryrose T. Sylvester
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Number of Meetings Held in 2021: 5
Our MD&C Committee is responsible for overseeing our executive officer compensation, as well as developing the
Company’s compensation philosophy generally. The MD&C Committee’s written charter, which was approved by the
Board of Directors, can be found on our website. In fulfilling its duties, the MD&C Committee has the following
responsibilities:
• Review and establish policies governing the compensation and benefits of our executive officers;
• Approve the compensation of our executive officers and set the bonus plan goals for those individuals;
• Conduct an annual evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer by all independent directors and set his compensation;
• Oversee the administration of our equity-based incentive plans;
• Review the results of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation and consider any implications of such
voting results on the Company’s compensation programs;
• Recommend to the full Board new Company compensation and benefit plans or changes to our existing plans;
• Evaluate and recommend to the Board the compensation paid to our non-employee directors;
• Review the independence of the MD&C Committee’s compensation consultant annually; and
• Perform an annual review of its performance relative to its charter and report the results of its evaluation to the full
Board.
In overseeing compensation matters, the MD&C Committee may delegate authority for day-to-day administration and
interpretation of the Company’s plans, including selection of participants, determination of award levels within plan
parameters, and approval of award documents, to Company employees. However, the MD&C Committee may not
delegate any authority to Company employees under those plans for matters affecting the compensation and benefits of
the executive officers.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The MD&C Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 23,
with management. Based on their review and discussions, the MD&C Committee recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
The Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Andrés R. Gluski, Chairman
Kathleen M. Mazzarella
William B. Plummer
John C. Pope
Maryrose T. Sylvester
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
10 |
2022 Proxy Statement
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During 2021, Ms. Mazzarella, Ms. Sylvester and Messrs. Gluski, Plummer, Pope and Weidemeyer served on the MD&C
Committee, as well as retired Director Mr. Frank M. Clark, Jr. No member of the MD&C Committee was an officer or
employee of the Company during 2021; no member of the MD&C Committee is a former officer of the Company; and
during 2021, none of our executive officers served as a member of a board of directors or compensation committee of
any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve on our Board of Directors or MD&C Committee.
THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Members:
Kathleen M. Mazzarella, Chairman
Victoria M. Holt
Ms. Mazzarella was named Chairman of our Nominating and Governance Committee in May 2018. Each member of our
Nominating and Governance Committee is independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of the New York
Stock Exchange.
John C. Pope
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Number of Meetings Held in 2021: 6
Key Functions
The Nominating and Governance Committee has a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors and
can be found on our website. It is the duty of the Nominating and Governance Committee to oversee matters regarding
corporate governance.
In fulfilling its duties, the Nominating and Governance Committee has the following
responsibilities:
• Review and recommend the composition of our Board, including the nature and duties of each of our committees, in
accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
• Evaluate the charters of each of the committees and recommend directors to serve as committee chairs;
• Review individual director’s performance in consultation with the Chairman of the Board and review the overall
effectiveness of the Board;
• Recommend retirement policies for the Board, the terms for directors and the proper ratio of employee directors to
outside directors;
• Perform an annual review of its performance relative to its charter and report the results of its evaluation to the full
Board;
• Review stockholder proposals received for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and recommend action to be
taken with regard to the proposals to the Board; and
• Identify and recommend to the Board candidates to fill director vacancies.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is continually engaged in reviewing the skills, expertise and qualifications
of our existing directors, as well as potential external candidates, to identify and nominate the best possible candidates
to guide and support the Company’s strategy and its commitment to serve and care for our customers, the environment,
the communities in which we work and our stockholders. This is a process that the Nominating and Governance
Committee believes should continue to involve significant subjective judgments.
The Nominating and Governance Committee considers current and future needs of the Board as a whole and reviews a
matrix of experience, skills and expertise to inform nominee criteria. The Committee recommends individuals as
nominees based on an evaluation of all factors deemed relevant, including personal and professional integrity and
sound judgment, business and professional skills and experience, independence, possible conflicts of interest, diversity
and the potential for effectiveness, in conjunction with the other directors, to serve the long-term interests of the
stockholders. The Committee seeks diversity of background, thoughts and opinions on the Board obtained through,
among other factors, diversity in business experience, professional expertise, gender and racial / ethnic background.
The Nominating and Governance Committee has considered the gender and racial / ethnic composition of our Board,
including the presence of three women, Mr. Plummer’s self-identification as African American / Black and Mr. Gluski’s
self-identification as Hispanic, and believes these factors, among numerous others, contribute to a valuable diversity of
background, thoughts and opinions on our Board.
2022 Proxy Statement | 11
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
When nominating or re-nominating individuals to serve as directors of the Company, the Nominating and Governance
Committee also consider prior contributions to the Board, evaluation feedback, tenure and age of the Board as a whole
and tenure and age of the individual. The Nominating and Governance Committee also takes into account the nature and
extent of the directors’ other commitments when determining whether to re-nominate that individual for election to the
Board. In addition to complying with the limitations on public company board memberships set forth in the Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the Committee expects each director to ensure that his or her other commitments do not
interfere with his or her duties as a director of the Company. The Committee’s primary formal mechanism to support
Board refreshment is the retirement age policy set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which includes the
guideline that directors will not stand for reelection to the Board after reaching age 75 unless the Nominating and
Governance Committee, having considered the foregoing factors, recommends otherwise. The Committee believes that
existing practices have been effective at bringing in new expertise and perspectives, while also maintaining the valuable
industry knowledge, experience and stability that our longer-tenured directors provide.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider all potential nominees on their merits and welcomes
suggestions from directors, members of management, and stockholders. Before being recommended for nomination
by the Committee, director candidates are interviewed by the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Nominating
and Governance Committee, and the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, as well as additional members of the Board
and an outside consultant. To suggest a nominee for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee, you
should submit your candidate’s name, together with biographical information and his or her written consent to
nomination to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Waste Management, Inc., 800 Capitol Street,
Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002, between October 30, 2022 and November 29, 2022. Also, see “Stockholder Proposals
and Nominees for the 2022 Annual Meeting – Proxy Access Nominations” for additional information about timing,
notification and informational requirements under the Company’s proxy access By-law provisions.
Related Party Transactions
The Board of Directors has adopted a written Related Party Transactions Policy for the review and approval of related
party transactions. Our policy generally defines related party transactions as current or proposed transactions since the
beginning of the last fiscal year in excess of $120,000 in which (a) the Company is a participant and (b) any director;
executive officer; immediate family member of any director or executive officer; or party known to be the owner of more
than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock has a direct or indirect material interest. In addition, the policy sets
including (a) executive officer
forth certain transactions that will not be considered related party transactions,
compensation and benefit arrangements; (b) director compensation arrangements; (c) business travel and expenses,
advances and reimbursements in the ordinary course of business; (d) indemnification payments and advancement of
expenses, and payments under directors’ and officers’ indemnification insurance policies; (e) any transaction between
the Company and any entity in which a related party has a relationship solely as a director; a less than 5% equity holder;
a beneficial owner of the Company’s Common Stock that reports such ownership on a Schedule 13G due to lack of
control or intent to influence control; or an employee (other than an executive officer) and (f) purchases of Company debt
securities, provided that the related party has a passive ownership of no more than 2% of the principal amount of any
outstanding series. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the policy.
All executive officers and directors are required to notify the Chief Legal Officer as soon as practicable of any potential
related party transaction that involves the Company. The Chief Legal Officer will determine whether such transaction or
relationship constitutes a related party transaction that must be referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee.
In the event that the Chief Legal Officer is a participant in a potential related party transaction, the determination whether
the transaction must be referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee shall be made by the Chief Executive
Officer, with consultation from the Corporate Secretary and the Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer. Any member of the
Committee who has an interest in a transaction presented for consideration will abstain from voting on the related party
transaction.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will review a detailed description of the transaction, including the terms of
the transaction; the business purpose of the transaction; the benefits to the Company and to the relevant related party;
and whether the transaction would require a waiver of the Company’s Code of Conduct.
12 |
2022 Proxy Statement
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider,
among other things, the following factors:
• whether the terms of the related party transaction are fair to the Company and such terms would be reasonable
in an arms-length transaction;
• whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into the related party transaction;
• whether the related party transaction would impair the independence of any non-employee director;
• whether the related party transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive
officer of the Company; and
• whether the related party transaction is material to the Company or the individual.
The Nominating and Governance Committee’s consideration of related party transactions and its determination of
whether to approve such a transaction are reflected in the minutes of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s
meetings. As discussed above under “Independence of Board Members,” the Company reviewed all transactions between
the Company and each entity with which a non-employee director is affiliated, as well as all transactions between the
Company and each entity with which an executive officer is affiliated, and the Company is not aware of any transactions
in 2021 that are required to be disclosed.
Board of Directors Governing Documents
Stockholders may obtain copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Audit Committee, the MD&C
Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee, and our Code of Conduct free of charge by contacting the
Corporate Secretary, c/o Waste Management, Inc., 800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002 or by accessing
the “ESG — Corporate Governance” section of the “Investors” page on our website at www.wm.com.
Non-Employee Director Compensation
Our non-employee director compensation program consists of equity awards and cash consideration. Director
compensation is recommended annually by the MD&C Committee, with the assistance of an independent third-party
consultant, and set by action of the Board of Directors. The Board’s goal in designing directors’ compensation is to
provide a competitive package that will enable the Company to attract and retain highly skilled individuals with relevant
experience. The compensation is also designed to reward the time and talent required to serve on the board of a company
of our size and complexity. The Board seeks to provide sufficient flexibility in the form of compensation delivered to meet
the needs of different individuals while ensuring that a substantial portion of directors’ compensation is linked to the
long-term success of the Company. The 2021 non-employee director compensation levels were established in
February 2020.
Equity Compensation
Non-employee directors receive an annual grant of shares of Common Stock under the Company’s 2014 Stock Incentive
Plan. The shares are fully vested at the time of grant; however, non-employee directors are required to hold all net
shares until one year after retirement and are subject to ownership guidelines, as discussed below. The grant of shares
is generally made in two equal installments, and the number of shares issued is based on the market value of our
Common Stock on the dates of grant, which are typically January 15 and July 15 of each year. Each non-employee
director serving at the time received a grant of Common Stock valued at approximately $82,500 in January 2021 and
July 2021. Mr. Weidemeyer received an additional grant of Common Stock valued at approximately $50,000 in each of
January 2021 and July 2021 for his service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board in 2021.
2022 Proxy Statement | 13
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Cash Compensation
All non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer for Board service and additional cash retainers for serving
as a committee chair. Directors do not receive meeting fees in addition to the retainers. The annual cash retainer is
generally paid in advance in two equal installments in January and July of each year. The table below sets forth the cash
retainers for 2021:
$115,000
Annual Retainer:
Annual Chair Retainers: $100,000 for Non-Executive Chairman
$25,000 for Audit Committee Chair
$20,000 for MD&C Committee Chair
$20,000 for Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors
Our non-employee directors are subject to ownership guidelines that establish a minimum ownership level and require
that all net shares received in connection with a stock award, after selling shares to pay all applicable taxes, be held
throughout their tenure as a director. The ownership guideline for non-employee directors is equal to approximately five
times the non-employee directors’ annualized cash retainer. As of December 31, 2021, this amount was $575,000. There
is no deadline for non-employee directors to reach their ownership guideline; however, the MD&C Committee performs
regular reviews to confirm that all non-employee directors are in compliance or are showing sustained progress toward
achievement of their ownership guideline. Based on the closing price of our Common Stock on March 15, 2022, all of our
non-employee directors have reached the ownership guideline, except our newest directors, Mr. Menke and Ms. Sylvester,
are making appropriate progress toward the ownership guideline. Additionally, our Insider Trading Policy provides that
directors are not permitted to hedge their ownership of Company securities, including trading in options, warrants, puts
and calls or similar derivative instruments on any security of the Company or selling any security of the Company “short.”
Director Compensation Table
The table below shows the aggregate cash paid, and stock awards issued, to the non-employee directors in 2021 in
accordance with the descriptions set forth above:
Name
Frank M. Clark, Jr.(2)
Andrés R. Gluski(3)
Victoria M. Holt
Kathleen M. Mazzarella
Sean E. Menke(4)
William B. Plummer
John C. Pope
Maryrose T. Sylvester(4)
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
(1) Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in 2021, in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The grant date
fair value of the awards is equal to the number of shares issued multiplied by the average of the high and
low market price of our Common Stock on each date of grant; there are no assumptions used in the
valuation of shares.
Total ($)
150,041
293,639
280,039
300,039
233,375
305,039
280,039
233,375
479,967
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)
67,500
128,600
115,000
135,000
95,833
140,000
115,000
95,833
215,000
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
82,541
165,039
165,039
165,039
137,542
165,039
165,039
137,542
264,967
(2) As of the 2021 Annual Meeting, Mr. Clark had reached the retirement age set forth in the Company’s
Corporate Governance Guidelines; therefore, he did not stand for re-election and his term as a director of
the Company expired on May 11, 2021.
(3) Mr. Gluski received prorated cash compensation for service as MD&C Committee Chairman from May 11,
2021 until the next regular installment of compensation payments in July 2021.
(4) Mr. Menke and Ms. Sylvester were elected to our Board on March 15, 2021 and each received prorated
equity compensation and cash compensation for service as a director from the date of election until the
next regular installments in July 2021.
14 |
2022 Proxy Statement
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Item 1 on the Proxy Card)
The first item on the proxy card is the election of nine directors to serve until the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or
until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Board has nominated the nine director
candidates named below and recommends that you vote FOR their election. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to
serve as a director, which we do not anticipate, the Board, by resolution, may reduce the number of directors that
constitute the Board or may choose a substitute. To be elected, a director must receive a majority of the votes cast with
respect to that director at the meeting. Our Company’s By-laws provide that if the number of shares voted “for” any
director nominee does not exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to that director, he or she will tender his or her
resignation to the Board of Directors contingent on the acceptance of such resignation by the Board. The Nominating and
Governance Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or
whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the resignation, taking into account the Nominating and
Governance Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days of
the date of the certification of the election results.
The table below shows all of our director nominees; their ages, terms of office on our Board; experience within at least
the past five years; and qualifications our Board considered when inviting them to serve as a director as well as
nominating them for re-election. We believe that, as a general matter, our directors’ past five years of experience gives
an indication of the wealth of knowledge and experience these individuals have and that our Board considered; however,
we have also included specific skills and areas of expertise that makes each of these individuals a valuable member of
our Board. Each of the director nominees currently serves on our Board of Directors.
Director Nominees
JAMES C. FISH, JR.
Age: 59
Director since:
2016
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
President and Chief Executive Officer — Waste Management, Inc. since November 2016; also
served as President and Chief Financial Officer — from July 2016 to November 2016;
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2012 to July 2016; Senior Vice
President — Eastern Group from 2011 to 2012; Area Vice President — Pennsylvania and
West Virginia Area from 2009 to 2011 and Market Area General Manager — Western
Pennsylvania/West Virginia from 2008 to 2009 and Rhode Island/Southern Massachusetts
from 2006 to 2008.
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Fish has been our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of
Directors since November 2016. Mr. Fish joined the Company in 2001 and held several key
positions with the Company prior to his promotion, including Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President for the Company’s Eastern Group, Area Vice
President for the Pennsylvania and West Virginia Area and Vice President of Price
Management. As a result, Mr. Fish has a broad and deep understanding of the Company and
the strategic actions necessary to deliver stockholder value.
2022 Proxy Statement | 15
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
ANDRÉS R. GLUSKI
Age: 64
Director since:
2015
Board Committees:
Audit and Management
Development &
Compensation
(Chair)
VICTORIA M. HOLT
Age: 64
Director since:
2013
Board Committees:
Audit and Nominating &
Governance
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director — The AES Corporation (global energy
company) since 2011; also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
from 2007 to 2011.
Director of AES Gener (Chile) from 2005 to January 2020.
QUALIFICATIONS
As CEO of The AES Corporation, a Fortune 500 company in the electricity sector, Mr. Gluski
has led the transformation of the company to become a leader in renewable energy, energy
storage and cloud-based energy efficiency services. In 2021, AES was the largest seller of
renewable energy to corporate customers in the world, according to Bloomberg New Energy
Finance. Under his leadership, AES has been designated as one of the World’s Most Ethical
Companies by the Ethisphere® Institute every year since 2014. Mr. Gluski has extensive
experience in finance and operations. He is currently on the Executive Committee of the
Edison Electric Institute’s Board of Directors and serves as Chairman of the Council of the
Americas. Mr. Gluski has been voted one of the “Most Influential Leaders” by Latino Leaders
magazine and served on The President’s Advisory Council for Trade from 2013 to 2016.
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer — Proto Labs, Inc. (online and technology-
enabled quick-turn manufacturer), served from 2014 to March 2021; also served as Director
from 2014 — May 2021.
Director of Piper Sandler Companies since September 2019.
Director of A. O. Smith Corp. since April 2021.
QUALIFICATIONS
Ms. Holt has served in executive positions at public companies for many years, providing her
with extensive knowledge about operations, management, logistical requirements and
measuring financial performance of large public companies. Her background and education
provide her with expertise in applying environmental solutions, and she brings particular
focus to execution of the Company’s technology-led growth strategy and use of data
analytics. She also has many years of experience serving on the board of directors for public
companies.
16 |
2022 Proxy Statement
KATHLEEN M. MAZZARELLA
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer — Graybar Electric Company,
Inc.
(distributor of electrical, communications and data networking products and provider of
related supply chain management and logistics services) since 2013; also served as
President and Chief Executive Officer from 2012 to 2013 and Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to 2012.
Director of Cigna Corporation since December 2018.
Director of Express Scripts Holding Company from June 2017 until acquisition by Cigna
Corporation in December 2018.
Director of Core & Main since January 2019.
QUALIFICATIONS
Ms. Mazzarella has experience serving as the chief executive of a large corporation,
developing expertise in the areas of logistics and supply chain management. During her
more than 40-year tenure at Graybar, Ms. Mazzarella has held executive-level positions in
sales, human resources, strategic planning and marketing. This diverse background
combined with her deep and valuable experience leading various aspects of a customer-
focused business will help the Company achieve its strategy to provide an exceptional
customer experience. She also has experience serving on large public company, private
company and non-profit boards.
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Chief Executive Officer and Director — Sabre Corporation (software and technology solutions
provider to the travel industry) since December 2016; also served as President of Sabre
Corporation from 2016 to December 2021.
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Menke is a proven transformation leader, using his extensive experience in technology
and transportation operations to bring together strategy and data to address complex
issues. Mr. Menke has substantial executive leadership experience, having served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sabre Corporation since 2016, preceded by more
than 20 years in the airline industry. His expertise in logistics and commitment to delivering
efficient, customer-focused innovation through imaginative technology solutions will help
further the Company’s strategy to differentiate our services. Mr. Menke also has
several years of experience serving on a public company board of directors.
Age: 62
Director since:
2015
Board Committees:
Management
Development &
Compensation and
Nominating &
Governance (Chair)
SEAN E. MENKE
Age: 53
Director since:
March 2021
Board Committee:
Audit
2022 Proxy Statement | 17
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
WILLIAM B. PLUMMER
Age: 63
Director since:
August 2019
Board Committees:
Audit (Chair) and
Management
Development &
Compensation
JOHN C. POPE
Age: 72
Director since:
1997
Board Committees:
Management
Development &
Compensation and
Nominating &
Governance
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — United Rentals, Inc. (world’s
largest equipment rental company), served from 2008 to October 2018; also served as
Senior Adviser from October 2018 to January 2019.
Director of Global Payments Inc. since May 2017.
Director of Mason Industrial Technology, Inc. since February 2021.
Director of Nesco Holdings, Inc. from July 2019 to March 2021.
Director of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. from 2003 to September 2019.
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Plummer has more than two decades of financial leadership experience. During his
tenure at United Rentals, Mr. Plummer was responsible for the development of the
company’s finance activities, investor relations, and co-led its merger, acquisition and
divestiture strategies. Mr. Plummer also served as Chief Financial Officer of Dow Jones &
Company, where he set policy for global finance and corporate strategy. Mr. Plummer has
experience as a member of the board of directors of a number of other large public
companies, with particular focus on audit committee service and leadership.
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Chairman of the Board — PFI Group (private investment firm) since 1994.
Lead Director — The Kraft Heinz Company since January 2021; Director of The Kraft Heinz
Company, or predecessor companies including Kraft Foods Group, Inc., since 2001.
Director of Talgo S.A. since 2015.
Chairman of the Board — R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company from 2014 to February 2022;
Director of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, or predecessor companies, from 1996 to
February 2022.
QUALIFICATIONS
Prior to his service on the boards of multiple major corporations, Mr. Pope served in
executive operational and financial positions at large airline companies for almost 20 years,
providing him with extensive experience and knowledge of management of large public
companies with large-scale logistical challenges, high fixed-cost structure and significant
capital requirements. His background, education and board service also provide him with
expertise in finance and accounting. Mr. Pope has served on the board of directors for many
public companies for over 30 years.
18 |
2022 Proxy Statement
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Retired U.S. Managing Director and U.S. Head of Electrification — ABB Ltd. (global technology
company focused on electrification, robotics, power and automation), served from
August 2019 to August 2020.
Former President and Chief Executive Officer — Current, powered by GE (energy services
and information technology subsidiary of General Electric subsequently acquired by private
equity investors), served from 2015 to June 2019; also served as President and Chief
Executive Officer — GE Lighting from 2011 to 2015 and President and Chief Executive
Officer — GE Intelligent Platforms (GE Fanuc) from 2006 to 2011.
Director of Harley-Davidson, Inc. since August 2016.
Director of Vontier Corporation since March 2021.
QUALIFICATIONS
Ms. Sylvester is a strategic, growth-oriented leader who is passionate about technology,
innovation and automation. Through her recent experience leading the U.S. electrification
business for ABB Group, combined with her 19 years of executive leadership for divisions of
GE, Ms. Sylvester has developed expertise in delivering technology-enabled and energy-
efficient sustainable solutions. Ms. Sylvester brings extensive knowledge regarding
consumer marketing, supply chain strategy, and operational improvement. She also has
valuable governance experience from her service on public company boards.
POSITION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
Retired Chief Operating Officer — United Parcel Service, Inc. (package delivery and supply
chain services company), served from 2001 to 2003; also served as Director from 1997 to
2003 and Senior Vice President from 1994 to 2003.
Former President, UPS Airlines (UPS owned airline) from 1994 to 2003.
Director of NRG Energy, Inc. since 2003.
Director of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company from 2004 to April 2020.
QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Weidemeyer served in executive positions at a large public company for several years
and has served as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since May 2018. His roles
encompassed significant operational management responsibility, providing him knowledge
and experience in an array of functional areas critical to large public companies, including
supply chain and logistics management. Mr. Weidemeyer also has over 20 years of
experience serving on the board of directors for public companies.
MARYROSE T. SYLVESTER
Age: 56
Director since:
March 2021
Board Committee:
Management
Development &
Compensation
THOMAS H. WEIDEMEYER
Age: 74
Director since:
2005
Chairman of the
Board since:
May 2018
Board Committees:
Audit, Management
Development &
Compensation and
Nominating & Governance
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION
OF EACH OF THE NINE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.
2022 Proxy Statement | 19
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER STOCK OWNERSHIP
Our Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors based on the
recommendation of the MD&C Committee, as described in the Non-Employee Director Compensation discussion. Our
executive officers, including Mr. Fish, are also subject to stock ownership guidelines, as described in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis.
The Security Ownership of Management table below shows the number of shares of Common Stock each director and
each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table beneficially owned as of March 15, 2022, our record
date for the Annual Meeting, as well as the number owned by all directors and executive officers as a group. These
individuals, both individually and in the aggregate, own less than 1% of our outstanding shares as of the record date.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
Name
Andrés R. Gluski
Victoria M. Holt
Kathleen M. Mazzarella(3)
Sean E. Menke
William B. Plummer
John C. Pope
Maryrose T. Sylvester
Thomas H. Weidemeyer(4)
James C. Fish, Jr.(5)
Devina A. Rankin
John J. Morris, Jr.
Charles C. Boettcher
Tara J. Hemmer
All directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons)(6)
Shares of Common
Stock Owned(1)
13,759
19,257
11,671
1,551
3,776
55,065
1,551
35,324
245,226
49,428
107,552
31,680
37,517
738,854
Shares of Common
Stock Covered by
Exercisable Options(2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
140,703
37,125
49,801
34,518
44,005
468,586
(1) The table reports beneficial ownership in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. The amounts reported
above include 4,081 stock equivalents attributed to Mr. Fish and 2,295 stock equivalents attributed to Mr. Morris,
based on their holdings in the Company’s 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan stock fund. The amounts reported above
also include 94,844 shares of Common Stock deferred by Mr. Fish. Deferred shares were earned on account of
vested equity awards and pay out in shares of Common Stock after the executive’s departure from the Company
pursuant to the Company’s 409A Deferral Savings Plan (“409A Deferral Plan”).
Executive officers may choose a Waste Management stock fund as an investment option for deferred cash
compensation under the Company’s 409A Deferral Plan. Interests in the fund are considered phantom stock because
they are equal in value to shares of our Common Stock, but these amounts are not invested in stock or funds.
Phantom stock is not included in the table above, but it represents an investment risk based on the performance of
our Common Stock. Mr. Morris has 2,491 phantom stock equivalents under the 409A Deferral Plan.
(2)
Includes the number of options currently exercisable and options that will become exercisable within 60 days of our
record date.
(3) Shares are held by the Mazzarella Living Trust, for which Ms. Mazzarella and her husband serve as trustees.
(4) Shares are held by the Thomas H. Weidemeyer and Mary R. Weidemeyer Trust, for which Mr. Weidemeyer and his
wife serve as trustees.
(5)
(6)
Includes 95,577 shares held in trusts for the benefit of Mr. Fish’s minor children.
Included in the “All directors and executive officers as a group” are 10,949 stock equivalents attributable to the
executive officers’ collective holdings in the Company’s 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan stock fund. This group also
holds an aggregate of 8,729 phantom stock equivalents under the 409A Deferral Plan that are not included in the
table.
20 |
2022 Proxy Statement
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The table below shows information for persons known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our Common Stock
based on their filings with the SEC through March 15, 2022.
Name and Address
William H. Gates III
500 Fifth Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98109
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
Shares Beneficially
Owned
Number
35,234,344(2)
Percent(1)
8.5%
34,980,666(3)
8.4%
29,941,759(4)
7.2%
(1) Percentage is calculated using the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of
March 15, 2022.
(2) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022. Mr. Gates reports that he
has sole voting and dispositive power over 16,600,672 shares of Common Stock held by Cascade Investment, L.L.C.,
as the sole member of such entity. Additionally, the Schedule 13G/A reports that Mr. Gates and Melinda French
Gates share voting and dispositive power over 18,633,672 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation Trust, as co-trustees.
(3) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2022. The Vanguard Group reports
that it has shared voting power over 641,208 shares of Common Stock, shared dispositive power over 1,612,971
shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 33,367,695 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned.
(4) This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2022. BlackRock, Inc. reports that
it has sole voting power over 25,700,248 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 29,941,759
shares of Common Stock beneficially owned.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
The federal securities laws require our executive officers and directors to file reports of their holdings and transactions
in our Common Stock with the SEC. Based on a review of the forms and written representations from our executive
officers and directors, we are aware of one delinquent report for 2021. On December 14, 2021, Ms. Nagy received a grant
of restricted stock units that will vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant. Due to an administrative error,
this grant was not reported on a Form 4 at the time, but upon discovery was reported on a Form 5 in January 2022.
2022 Proxy Statement | 21
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following is a listing of our current executive officers, their ages and their business experience for the past five years
(other than Mr. Fish, whose age, experience and qualifications are included in the director nominees section of this Proxy
Statement). Unless otherwise specified, all prior positions listed below were with our Company.
Name
Steven R. Batchelor
Charles C. Boettcher
Rafael E. Carrasco
Tara J. Hemmer
John J. Morris, Jr.
Leslie K. Nagy
Tamla D. Oates-Forney
Devina A. Rankin
Age
64
48
50
49
52
47
50
46
Positions Held and Business Experience for Past Five Years
• Senior Vice President — Operations since January 2019.
• Vice President, Collections and Fleet Operations from 2013 to December 2018.
• Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer since
February 2020.
• Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer from
May 2019 to February 2020.
• Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer from January 2017 to May 2019.
• Also served as Chief Compliance Officer from May 2017 to February 2018.
• Senior Vice President — Operations since July 2021.
• Area Vice President — Greater Mid-Atlantic Area from April 2017 to June 2021.
• Area Vice President — Eastern Canada Area from 2016 to March 2017.
• Senior Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer since July 2021.
• Senior Vice President — Operations from January 2019 to June 2021.
• Senior Vice President — Operations, Safety and Environmental Compliance
from January 2018 to December 2018.
• Vice President — Disposal Operations, Closed Sites and Environmental
Compliance from September 2017 to January 2018.
• Area Vice President — Greater Mid-Atlantic Area from 2012 to May 2017.
• Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2019.
• Senior Vice President — Operations from 2012 to December 2018.
• Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since November 2017.
• Principal Accounting Officer and Controller, Parker Drilling Company, an oilfield
services company, from 2014 to November 2017.
• Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer since December 2018.
• Vice President, Human Resources, GE Energy Connections, an electrification
and automation business included in the General Electric Company
multinational conglomerate, from 2014 to April 2018.
• Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2020.
• Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2017 to
February 2020.
• Also continued to serve as Treasurer from February 2017 to August 2017.
• Vice President, Treasurer and Acting Chief Financial Officer from January 2017
to February 2017.
Nikolaj H. Sjoqvist
49
• Senior Vice President and Chief Digital Officer since October 2017.
Michael J. Watson
52
• Vice President — Revenue Management from 2012 to October 2017.
• Senior Vice President and Chief Customer Officer since October 2018.
• Area Vice President — Illinois / Missouri Valley Area from 2013 to
September 2018.
22 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
The Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information about the Company’s executive
compensation philosophy and the components of its compensation programs. This includes information about how
compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 aligned with the
Company’s 2021 financial goals and performance. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis helps readers better
understand the information found in the Summary Compensation Table and other accompanying tables included in this
Proxy Statement.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on our executive pay program as it relates to the following executive
officers during 2021, whom we refer to as the “named executive officers” or “named executives”:
• Mr. James C. Fish, Jr. — President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2016.
• Ms. Devina A. Rankin — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since February 2020.
• Mr. John J. Morris, Jr. — Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2019.
• Mr. Charles C. Boettcher — Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer since
February 2020.
• Ms. Tara J. Hemmer — Senior Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer since July 2021; Senior Vice
President — Operations from January 2019 to June 2021.
For additional information about the named executives’ background and prior experience with the Company, see
“Executive Officers” above.
Executive Summary
The objective of our executive compensation program is to attract, retain, reward and incentivize talented employees
who will lead the Company in the successful execution of our strategy. The Company seeks to accomplish this goal by
designing a compensation program that is supportive of and aligns with the strategy of the Company and the creation of
stockholder value, while discouraging excessive risk-taking.
We have enabled a people-first, technology-led focus to drive our mission, that we are always working for a sustainable
tomorrow. Our strategy leverages and sustains the strongest asset network in the industry to drive best in class customer
experience and growth. As North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental
services, sustainability and environmental stewardship is embedded in all that we do. As a result, we believe that positive
financial results, including the results for the performance measures on which our executives are compensated, are
naturally aligned with the successful execution of our goals to put our people first and position them to serve and care for
our customers, the environment, the communities in which we work and our stockholders. On the other hand, we believe
our Company would not be successful, on financial performance measures or otherwise, without our industry-leading
focus on sustainability.
The following key structural elements and policies further the objective of our executive compensation program:
• a substantial majority of executive compensation is linked to Company performance, through annual cash
incentive performance criteria and long-term equity-based incentive awards. As a result, our executive
compensation program provides for notably higher total compensation in periods of above-target Company
performance, as we saw with respect to equity awards with a three-year performance period ended 2021 and the
2021 annual cash incentive award;
• at target, 72% of total compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer was tied to long-term equity
awards, and approximately 60% of total compensation of our other named executives, on average, was tied to
long-term equity awards, which aligns executives’ interests with those of stockholders;
2022 Proxy Statement | 23
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
• our total direct compensation opportunities for named executive officers are targeted to fall in a range around the
competitive median;
• performance-based awards include threshold, target and maximum payouts correlating to a range of
performance outcomes and are based on a variety of indicators of performance, which limits risk-taking behavior;
• performance stock units with a three-year performance period, as well as stock options that vest over a three-
interests with long-term performance and reduce incentives to maximize
year period,
link executives’
performance in any one year;
• all of our executive officers are subject to stock ownership guidelines, which we believe demonstrates a
commitment to, and confidence in, the Company’s long-term prospects;
• the Company has clawback provisions in its equity award agreements and executive officer employment
agreements, and has adopted a clawback policy applicable to annual incentive compensation, designed to recoup
compensation when cause and/or misconduct are found;
• our executive officer severance policy implemented a limitation on the amount of benefits the Company may
provide to its executive officers under severance agreements (the “Severance Limitation Policy”); and
• the Company has adopted a policy that prohibits it from entering into agreements with executive officers that
provide for certain death benefits or tax gross-up payments.
2021 Pay-For-Performance
During 2021, we delivered strong revenue and income from operations as we continued to recover from COVID-19
pandemic impacts. We experienced improved yield and volume in our landfill, commercial and industrial collection
businesses and benefited from our October 2020 acquisition and successful integration of Advanced Disposal Services,
Inc. (“ADS”). However, our income from operations was impacted by constraints on labor availability, inflationary cost
pressures and commodity-driven business impacts, particularly from recycling brokerage rebates and higher fuel prices.
We continue to invest in our people through market wage adjustments, investments in our digital platform and training
for new team members. In addition, we were focused on executing on our disciplined pricing programs to drive margin
growth in the face of these additional labor cost and inflationary pressures. Following is a summary of the 2021
compensation program results:
Total Shareholder Return
With respect to the half of the performance share units (“PSUs”) granted in 2019 with a three-year performance period
ended December 31, 2021 that was subject to total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 (“TSR PSUs”), the
performance of the Company’s Common Stock on this measure translated into a percentile rank relative to the S&P 500
of 66.95%, resulting in a 167.78% payout on these PSUs in shares of Common Stock. This performance directly benefited
our stockholders, delivering total shareholder return of 91.96% over the three-year performance period.
Cash Flow Generation
The Company generated net cash flow from operating activities, less capital expenditures, for purposes of the
performance goal associated with the other half of our PSUs (“Cash Flow PSUs”) granted in 2019, of $7.49 billion,
exceeding the maximum performance level of $6.875 billion for the three-year performance period ended December 31,
2021. This performance resulted in a maximum 200% payout on these PSUs in shares of Common Stock. The robust
cash flow generation of our business over the three-year performance period has allowed the Company to fulfill its
priorities of investing in the business, funding acquisitions with strong returns, and returning available cash to
shareholders through dividend growth and Common Stock repurchases.
Annual Cash Incentive Performance Measures
Company performance on annual cash incentive performance measures for named executive officers is set forth below.
Due to these results, each of the named executives received an annual cash incentive payment for 2021 equal to 136.8%
of target.
24 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and Amortization — $4.961 billion, yielding a payout of 173.5%
Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and Amortization Margin (“Margin performance measure”) — 27.7%,
yielding a payout of 0%
Total Revenue — $17.931 billion, yielding a payout of 200%.
In 2021, the long-term equity compensation awards continued to demonstrate strong alignment between executive pay
and Company performance. The payouts on the PSUs granted in 2019 correlate with outstanding cash flow generation
and total shareholder return over the three-year performance period, and both stockholders and executives were
rewarded by these above-target results.
The blended results of the annual incentive performance measures, and the above target results on the income from
operations, excluding depreciation and amortization and total revenue performance measures, evidence the strength
and resilience of our business. The Company’s results on each of the performance measures reflect that our executives
took the right actions to deliver operating and financial performance in the face of broader macroeconomic pressures
and market disruption that intensified during the second half of 2021. Unfortunately, due in large part to the distorting
effect of our recycling brokerage business on the Margin performance measure, the Company’s results on this measure
fell below the threshold, yielding a 0% payout. The Company’s recycling brokerage business is a relatively small and
traditionally lower-margin offering; however, the recycling brokerage business is additive to the Company’s overall value
proposition and helps the Company attract and retain large accounts. As a result of the sharp increase in recycling
commodity prices in 2021, the recycling brokerage business made out-sized contributions to the Company’s revenue in
2021, but such revenue also had a more significant negative impact on the Company’s Margin performance measure.
The MD&C Committee recognized that the results on the Margin performance measure were not reflective of the
underlying performance and overall financial results of the Company in 2021, particularly the diligent efforts of
management to pursue operational efficiencies and manage costs in the face of labor, supply chain, transportation and
other market challenges. However, the overall above-target payout is reflective of the Company’s outstanding 2021
income from operations, excluding depreciation and amortization and total revenue performance that allowed the
Company to deliver on key strategic priorities, including successfully integrating the acquisition of ADS, driving disciplined
organic revenue growth, advancing technology investments focused on customer retention and growth, and cultivating
our people-first culture.
2021 Actual Performance and Compensation Payouts
Annual Incentive Plan
Long-Term Performance Share Units
Maximum
Target
Threshold
$4.961B Actual
$4.787 Target
(50% weight)
173.5%
Income from
Operations,
excluding
Depreciation &
Amortization
27.70% Actual
28.30% Target
(25% weight)
0%
Income from
Operations,
excluding
Depreciation &
Amortization
Margin
$7.49B Actual
$6,375B Target
(50% weight)
67th Percentile Actual
50th Percentile Target
(50% weight)
200%
167.78%
Combined
Results
183.89%
$17.931B Actual
$16.917B Target
(25% weight)
200%
Combined
Results
136.8%
Total Revenue
Annual
Incentive
Award
Payout
Relative TSR
(S&P 500)
Cash Flow
Generation
PSU Award
Payout
2022 Proxy Statement | 25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Consideration of Stockholder Advisory Vote
When establishing 2021 compensation for the named executives, the MD&C Committee noted the results of the advisory
stockholder votes on executive compensation, with more than 92.5% of shares present and entitled to vote at the annual
meeting voting in favor of the Company’s executive compensation every year since the advisory vote on compensation
was implemented. Accordingly, the results of the stockholder advisory vote have not caused the MD&C Committee to
recommend any changes to our compensation practices.
2022 Compensation Program Preview
The MD&C Committee continually reviews our compensation program to ensure it is clearly aligned with the business
strategy and best supports the accomplishment of our goals. The MD&C Committee also believes that consistency in
program design reinforces its efforts to maintain a compensation program that is straightforward, easy to communicate
and readily translates into actionable goals. The MD&C Committee’s choice of long-term performance measures and
respective weighting has been consistent since 2016, and the MD&C Committee is pleased with the financial results and
stockholder value that has been generated. Accordingly, the MD&C Committee has approved keeping the 2022 long-term
incentive program design for stock options and PSUs consistent with prior years. Additionally, in February 2022, the
MD&C Committee approved grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to Ms. Rankin, Mr. Morris and Ms. Hemmer in special
recognition of leadership and contributions critical to the acquisition of ADS and the subsequent integration and synergy
generation (the “ADS Integration Awards”). Mr. Boettcher received a grant of RSUs in connection with the ADS transaction
in February 2021, as the MD&C Committee desired to recognize his leadership and contributions critical to the negotiation
and consummation of the acquisition in October 2020 (the “ADS Closing Award”), discussed further below.
With respect to the annual incentive program, the design has been largely consistent over recent years. However, in
2021, two of the specific performance measures were modified, primarily in response to accounting and other impacts
from our acquisition of ADS. As such impacts have now normalized, the MD&C Committee has approved reverting to the
prior annual incentive program design by replacing the 2021 income from operations, excluding depreciation and
amortization margin performance measure with an income from operations margin performance measure, maintaining
its 25% weighting. Additionally, the 2021 total revenue performance measure has been replaced with the previous
internal revenue growth performance measure, also maintaining its 25% weighting.
Our Compensation Philosophy for Named Executive Officers
The Company’s compensation philosophy is designed to:
• Attract and retain exceptional employees through competitive compensation opportunities;
• Encourage and reward performance through substantial at-risk performance-based compensation, while
discouraging excessive risk-taking behavior; and
• Align our decision makers’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders through emphasis on equity
ownership.
Additionally, our compensation philosophy is intended to encourage executives to embrace the Company’s strategy and
to lead the Company in setting aspirations that will continue to drive exemplary performance.
With respect to our named executive officers, the MD&C Committee believes that total direct compensation at target
should be in a range around the competitive median according to the following:
• Base salaries should be paid within a range of plus or minus 10% around the competitive median, with attention
given to individual circumstances, including strategic importance of the named executive’s role, the executive’s
experience and individual performance;
• Target short-term and long-term incentive opportunities should generally be set at the competitive median; and
• Total direct compensation opportunities should generally be within a range of plus or minus 20% around the
competitive median.
26 |
2022 Proxy Statement
Overview of Elements of Our 2021 Executive Compensation Program
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Purpose
Key Features
To attract and retain
executives with a competitive
level of regular income
Adjustments to base salary primarily consider competitive
market data and the executive’s individual performance and
responsibilities.
Timing
Current
Short-Term
Performance
Incentive
Component
Base Salary
Annual Cash
Incentive
To encourage and reward
contributions to our annual
financial objectives through
performance-based
compensation subject to
challenging, yet attainable,
objective and transparent
metrics
Cash incentives are targeted at a percentage of base salary
and range from zero to 200% of target based on the following
performance measures:
• Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and
Amortization — designed to encourage balanced growth
and profitability (weighted 50%);
• Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and
Amortization Margin — designed to motivate pursuit of high
margin revenue growth while also controlling costs and
operating efficiently (weighted 25%); and
• Total Revenue — designed to support strategic growth
goals (weighted 25%).
The MD&C Committee has discretion to increase or decrease
an individual’s payment by up to 25% based on individual
performance, but such modifier has never been used to
increase a payment to a named executive.
Number of shares delivered range from zero to 200% of the
initial target grant based on performance over a three-year
performance period.
Payout on half of each executive’s PSUs granted in 2021 is
dependent on cash flow generation, defined as net cash flow
provided by operating activities, less capital expenditures,
with certain exclusions, which continues our focus on capital
discipline, while also aligning the Company with stockholders’
free cash flow expectations. We refer to these as Cash Flow
PSUs.
Payout on the remaining half of the PSUs granted in 2021 is
dependent on total shareholder return relative to other
companies in the S&P 500 over the three-year performance
period. We refer to these as TSR PSUs.
PSUs earn dividend equivalents that are paid at the end of the
performance period based on the number of shares earned.
Recipients can defer the receipt of shares, in which case such
shares of Common Stock will be paid out, without interest, at
the end of the deferral period.
Stock options granted in 2021 vest ratably in three annual
increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of
grant.
Exercise price is the average of the high and low market price
of our Common Stock on the date of grant.
Stock options have a term of ten years.
RSUs are not routinely an element of executive compensation,
but one-off grants are made in certain circumstances,
including in recognition of significant promotions and
contributions.
RSUs typically vest in full three years after the date of grant.
Time-based vesting aids retention. Dividend equivalents on
RSUs accrue and are paid in cash upon vesting.
2022 Proxy Statement | 27
Long-Term
Performance
Incentives
Performance Share
Units
To encourage and reward
building long-term stockholder
value through successful
strategy execution;
To retain executives; and
To increase stockholder
alignment through executives’
stock ownership
Stock Options
Restricted Stock
Units
To support the growth element
of the Company’s strategy and
encourage and reward stock
price appreciation over the
long-term;
To retain executives; and
To increase stockholder
alignment through executives’
stock ownership
Used on a limited basis (e.g.
promotion, new hire, special
recognition) to make awards
that encourage and reward
long-term performance and
increase alignment with
stockholders
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Deferral Plan. Each of our named executive officers is eligible to participate in our 409A Deferral Plan and may elect to
defer receipt of portions of their base salary and cash incentives in excess of the annual compensation threshold
established under Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”). We believe that
providing a program that allows and encourages planning for retirement is a key factor in our ability to attract and retain
talent. Additional details on the 409A Deferral Plan can be found in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021
table and accompanying disclosure.
Perquisites. The Company provides very limited perquisites or personal benefits to executive officers. The MD&C
Committee permits our President and Chief Executive Officer to use the Company’s aircraft for business and personal
travel; provided, however, that personal use of the Company aircraft attributed to him that results in incremental cost to
the Company shall not exceed 90 hours during any calendar year without approval from the Chairman of the MD&C
Committee. In 2021, our President and Chief Executive Officer had less than 18 hours of personal use of Company aircraft
under this standard. Personal use of the Company’s aircraft by other employees resulting in incremental cost to the
Company is permitted with Chief Executive Officer approval, although this does not occur frequently. The value of our
named executives’ personal use of the Company’s aircraft is treated as taxable income to the respective executive in
accordance with IRS regulations using the Standard Industry Fare Level formula. This is a different amount than we
calculate pursuant to the SEC requirement to report the incremental cost to us of their use. See note (4) to the Summary
Compensation Table below for additional information about this calculation.
Post-Employment and Change in Control Compensation. The Company provides severance protections that aid in retention
of senior leadership by providing the individual with comfort that he or she will be treated fairly in the event of an
involuntary termination not for cause. The change in control provisions included in our Executive Severance Protection
Plan, our stock option award documentation and, if applicable, employment agreements require a double trigger in order
to receive any payment in the event of a change in control situation. Additional details can be found under “— Post
Employment and Change in Control Compensation; Clawback Policies” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control.”
How Named Executive Officer Compensation Decisions are Made
The MD&C Committee meets several times each year to perform its responsibilities as delegated by the Board of Directors
and as set forth in the MD&C Committee’s charter. These responsibilities include evaluating and approving the Company’s
compensation philosophy, policies, plans and programs for our named executive officers. In the performance of its
duties, the MD&C Committee regularly reviews the total compensation, including the base salary, target annual cash
incentive award opportunities, long-term incentive award opportunities and other benefits, including potential severance
payments for each of our named executive officers. At a regularly scheduled meeting each year, the MD&C Committee
reviews our named executives’ total compensation and compares that compensation to the competitive market, as
discussed below. In the first quarter of each year, the MD&C Committee meets to determine salary increases, if any, for
the named executive officers; verifies the results of the Company’s performance for annual cash incentive and
performance share unit calculations; reviews the individual annual cash incentive targets for the current year as a percent
of base salary for each of the named executive officers; and makes decisions on granting long-term equity awards.
Compensation Consultant. The MD&C Committee uses several resources in its analysis of the appropriate compensation
for the named executive officers. The MD&C Committee selects and employs an independent consultant to provide advice
relating to market and general compensation trends. The MD&C Committee also uses the services of its independent
consultant for data gathering and analyses. The MD&C Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”)
as its independent consultant since 2002. The Company makes regular payments to FW Cook for its services around
executive compensation, including meeting preparation and attendance, advice, and best practice information, as well as
competitive data. Information about such payments is submitted to the Chairman of the MD&C Committee.
In addition to services related to executive compensation, FW Cook also provides the MD&C Committee information and
advice with respect to compensation of the non-employee directors. FW Cook has no other business relationships with
the Company and receives no other payments from the Company. The MD&C Committee adopted a charter provision
requiring that it consider the independence of any compensation consultants it uses for executive compensation matters.
The MD&C Committee has considered the independence of FW Cook in light of SEC rules and New York Stock Exchange
listing standards. In connection with this process, the MD&C Committee has reviewed, among other items, a letter from
FW Cook addressing the independence of FW Cook and the members of the consulting team serving the MD&C Committee,
28 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
including the following factors: (a) other services provided to us by FW Cook; (b) fees paid by us as a percentage of FW
Cook’s total revenue; (c) policies or procedures of FW Cook that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (d) any
business or personal relationships between the senior advisor of the consulting team with a member of the MD&C
Committee; (e) any Company stock owned by the senior advisor or any member of his immediate family and (f) any
business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the senior advisor. The MD&C Committee reviewed
these considerations and concluded that the work performed by FW Cook and its senior advisor involved in the
engagement did not raise any conflict of interest.
Role of CEO and our People Organization. Our President and Chief Executive Officer contributes to compensation
determinations by assessing the performance of the other named executive officers and providing these assessments
with recommendations to the MD&C Committee. Personnel within the Company’s People Organization assist the MD&C
Committee by working with the independent consultant to provide information requested by the MD&C Committee and
assisting it in designing and administering the Company’s compensation programs.
Peer Company Comparisons. The MD&C Committee uses compensation information of comparison groups of companies
to gauge the competitive market, which is relevant for attracting and retaining key talent and for ensuring that the
Company’s compensation practices are aligned with prevalent practices. For purposes of establishing the 2021 executive
compensation program, the MD&C Committee considered a competitive analysis of total direct compensation levels and
compensation mix for our executive officers during the second half of 2020, using information from:
• Size-adjusted median compensation data from two general industry surveys in which management annually
participates; the Aon Hewitt 2020 Total Compensation Measurement Survey and the Willis Towers Watson 2020
Executive Compensation Database Survey. The 2020 Aon Hewitt Total Compensation Measurement Survey
included 412 organizations ranging in size from approximately $30 million to $525 billion in annual revenue, and
the 2020 Willis Towers Watson Executive Compensation Database Survey included 841 organizations ranging in
size from approximately $50 million to $265 billion in annual revenue. Data selected from these surveys is scoped
based on Company revenue; and
• Median compensation data from a comparison group of 18 publicly traded U.S. companies, described below.
The comparison group of companies is initially recommended by the independent consultant prior to the data gathering
process, with input from management and the MD&C Committee. The composition of the group is evaluated, and a final
comparison group of companies is approved by the MD&C Committee each year. The selection process for the comparison
group begins with all companies in the Standard & Poor’s North American database that are publicly traded U.S.
companies in 15 different Global Industry Classifications. These industry classifications are meant to provide a collection
of companies in industries that share similar characteristics with us. The companies are then limited to those with at
least $5 billion in annual revenue to ensure appropriate comparisons, and further narrowed by choosing those with
asset intensive domestic operations, as well as those focusing on transportation and logistics. Companies with these
characteristics are chosen because the MD&C Committee believes that it is appropriate to compare our executives’
compensation with executives that have similar responsibilities and challenges at other companies.
2022 Proxy Statement | 29
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following chart sets forth various size comparisons to companies in the comparison group; this table is provided to
evidence that the Company was appropriately positioned within its peer group for purposes of establishing 2021
compensation during 2020. All financial and market data are taken from Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ, with financial data
as of each company’s 2019 fiscal year end and market capitalization as of December 31, 2019.
Peer Company Comparison Group
Net Revenue
Operating Income
Total Assets
Total Equity
Total Employees
Market Capitalization
50%
48%
56%
40%
73%
67%
WM Composite Percentile Rank
56%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
18 Company Comparison Group
American Electric Power
Grainger WW
Ryder System
Avis Budget
Halliburton
Southern
C.H. Robison WW
Hertz Global Holdings
Southwest Airlines
CSX
Entergy
FedEx
NextEra Energy
Sysco
Norfolk Southern
Union Pacific
Republic Services
UPS
For purposes of each of the named executives, the general industry data and the comparison group data are blended
when composing the competitive analysis, when possible, such that the combined general industry data and the
comparison group are each weighted 50%. For competitive comparisons, the MD&C Committee has determined that total
direct compensation packages for our named executive officers within a range of plus or minus 20% of the median total
compensation of the competitive analysis is appropriate. In making these determinations, total direct compensation
consists of base salary, target annual cash incentive, and the annualized grant date fair value of long-term equity
incentive awards.
Allocation of Compensation Elements and Tally Sheets. The MD&C Committee considers the forms in which total
compensation will be paid to executive officers and seeks to achieve an appropriate balance between base salary, annual
cash incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation. The MD&C Committee determines the size of each
element based primarily on comparison group data and individual and Company performance. The percentage of
compensation that is contingent on achievement of performance criteria typically increases in correlation to an executive
officer’s responsibilities within the Company, with performance-based incentive compensation making up a
greater percentage of total compensation for our most senior executive officers. Additionally, as an executive becomes
more senior, a greater percentage of the executive’s compensation shifts away from short-term to long-term incentive
awards.
The MD&C Committee uses tally sheets to review the compensation of our named executive officers, which show the
cumulative impact of all elements of compensation. These tally sheets include detailed information and dollar amounts
for each component of compensation, the value of all equity held by each named executive, and the value of welfare and
retirement benefits and severance payments. Tally sheets provide the MD&C Committee with the relevant information
necessary to determine whether the balance between short-term and long-term compensation, as well as fixed and
variable compensation, is consistent with the overall compensation philosophy of the Company. This information is also
useful in the MD&C Committee’s analysis of whether total direct compensation provides a compensation package that is
appropriate and competitive. Tally sheets are provided annually to the full Board of Directors.
30 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following charts display the allocation of total 2021 target compensation among base salary, annual cash incentive
and long-term equity awards for (a) our President and Chief Executive Officer and (b) our other named executives, on
average. These charts reflect the MD&C Committee’s 2021 desired total mix of target compensation for named executives,
other than our President and CEO, which includes approximately 60% of total compensation derived from long-term
equity awards, while long-term equity awards comprised 72% of our President and Chief Executive Officer’s total target
compensation. These charts also reflect that approximately 89% of our President and Chief Executive Officer’s total
target compensation opportunities awarded in 2021 were performance-based. Approximately 80% of the total target
compensation established in February 2021 for the other named executives, on average, was comprised of annual cash
incentive and long-term equity awards, all of which are performance-based with the exception of Mr. Boettcher’s ADS
Closing Award discussed below. We consider stock options granted under our long-term incentive plan to be
performance-based because their value will increase as the market value of our Common Stock increases.
President and CEO
Other Named Executives, on Average
11%
Base Salary
17%
Annual Cash
Incentive
72%
Long-Term
Equity Awards
61%
Long-Term
Equity Awards
20%
Base Salary
19%
Annual Cash
Incentive
Internal Pay Equity. The MD&C Committee considers the differentials between compensation of the named executive
officers. The MD&C Committee also reviews compensation comparisons between the President and Chief Executive
Officer and the other executive officers, while recognizing the additional responsibilities of the President and Chief
Executive Officer and that such differentials will increase in periods of above-target performance and decrease in times
of below-target performance. Based on these considerations, the MD&C Committee concluded that the compensation
paid to the President and Chief Executive Officer is reasonable compared to that of the other executive officers.
Tax and Accounting Matters. Following the revision of Section 162(m) of the IRC in 2017, the Company generally may no
longer take a deduction for any compensation paid to any of its named executive officers in excess of $1 million.
Section 409A of the IRC (“Code Section 409A”) generally provides that any deferred compensation arrangement that does
not meet specific requirements will result in immediate taxation of any amounts deferred to the extent not subject to a
substantial risk of forfeiture. In general, to avoid a Code Section 409A violation, amounts deferred may only be paid out on
separation from service, disability, death, a specified time or fixed schedule, a change in control or an unforeseen
emergency. Furthermore, the election to defer generally must be made in the calendar year prior to performance of
services. We intend to structure all of our compensation arrangements, including our 409A Deferral Plan, in a manner
that complies with or is exempt from Code Section 409A.
We account for equity-based payments, including stock options, PSUs and RSUs, in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). The MD&C
Committee takes into consideration the accounting treatment under ASC Topic 718 when determining the form and
amount of annual long-term equity incentive awards. However, because our long-term equity incentive awards are based
on a target dollar value established prior to grant (described in further detail under “Named Executives’ 2021
Compensation Program and Results — Long-Term Equity Incentives”), this “value” will differ from the grant date fair
value of awards calculated pursuant to ASC Topic 718 and reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
Risk Assessment. The MD&C Committee uses the structural elements set forth in the Executive Summary earlier to
establish compensation that will provide sufficient incentives for named executive officers to drive results while avoiding
unnecessary or excessive risk taking that could harm the long-term value of the Company. During 2021, the MD&C
Committee reviewed the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the assessment and analysis of related
risk conducted by the independent compensation consultant. Based on this review and analysis, the MD&C Committee
and the independent compensation consultant concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create
risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
2022 Proxy Statement | 31
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Policy on Calculation Adjustments.
In 2014, the MD&C Committee adopted a policy on calculation adjustments that affect
payouts under annual and long-term incentive awards in order to address the potentially distorting effect of certain
items. Such adjustments are intended to align award payments with the underlying performance of the business; avoid
volatile, artificial inflation or deflation of awards due to unusual items in either the award year or the previous comparator
year; and eliminate counterproductive incentives to pursue short-term gains and protect current incentive opportunities.
To ensure the integrity of the adjustments, the policy provides that the MD&C Committee’s approach to adjustments shall
generally be consistent with the Company’s approach to reporting adjusted non-GAAP earnings to the investment
community, except that the MD&C Committee has determined that potential adjustments arising from a single transaction
or event generally should be disregarded unless, taken together, they change the calculated award payout by at least
five percent. For this reason, actual results reported in this Proxy Statement on financial performance measures may
differ from earnings results reported to the investment community. The MD&C Committee retains discretion to evaluate
all adjustments, both income and expense, as circumstances warrant; however, the MD&C Committee has agreed that it
will not have the ability to use negative discretion with respect to the calculation of cash flow for purposes of the Cash
Flow PSUs, in order to avoid variable accounting treatment for those awards.
Named Executives’ 2021 Compensation Program and Results
Base Salary
The MD&C Committee approved increases to the 2021 base salaries of named executive officers, consistent with our
compensation philosophy and driven by competitive market data, internal pay equity considerations and individual
performance relative to the executive’s responsibilities and contributions. The table below shows the 2021 annual base
salary established by the MD&C Committee for each of our named executive officers.
Named Executive Officer
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Annual Cash Incentive
2021 Base Salary
$1,300,000
$ 704,247
$ 731,854
$ 650,003
$ 588,858
• Annual cash incentives were dependent on the following performance measures: Income from Operations, excluding
Depreciation and Amortization; Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and Amortization Margin and Total
Revenue.
• Blended results on the performance measures resulted in each of the named executives receiving an annual cash
incentive payment for 2021 equal to 136.8% of target.
The MD&C Committee develops financial performance measures for annual cash incentive awards to drive improvements
in business operations, as well as support and fund the long-term strategy of the Company. The MD&C Committee has
found that the income from operations, excluding depreciation and amortization performance measure encourages
balanced focus on growth and profitability. Our income from operations, excluding depreciation and amortization, as
a percentage of revenue performance measure, referred to as our Margin performance measure, encourages
responsible, high margin revenue growth and cost management and reduction. The total revenue performance measure
was implemented to encourage top line growth. The MD&C Committee believes these financial performance measures,
collectively, supported and aligned with the strategy of the Company in 2021. With the exception of the results on the
Margin performance measure, the MD&C Committee believes these performance measures are reflective of the
Company’s overall performance and are appropriate indicators of our progress toward the Company’s goals. See “2021
Pay-for-Performance” in the Executive Summary above for further discussion.
When setting threshold, target and maximum performance measure levels each year, the MD&C Committee looks to the
Company’s historical results of operations and analyses and forecasts for the coming year. Specifically, the MD&C
Committee considers expected revenue based on analyses of pricing and volume trends, as well as operational and
general economic factors and expected costs. The table below details the performance measures set by the MD&C
Committee for purposes of the named executive officers’ annual cash incentive for 2021.
32 |
2022 Proxy Statement
Income from Operations, excluding Depreciation and
Amortization
Margin
Total Revenue
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Threshold
Performance
(60% Payment)
Target
Performance
(100% Payment)
Maximum
Performance
(200% Payment)
$ 4.550 billion
$ 4.787 billion
$ 5.024 billion
28.0%
28.3%
28.8%
$16.068 billion
$16.917 billion
$17.766 billion
The following table sets forth the Company’s performance achieved on each of the annual cash incentive performance
measures and the payout earned on account of such performance.
Income from Operations,
excluding Depreciation
and Amortization
(weighted 50%)
Margin
(weighted 25%)
Total Revenue
(weighted 25%)
Actual
Payout
Earned
Actual
Payout
Earned
Actual
$4.961 billion
173.5%
27.7%
0%
$17.931 billion
Payout
Earned
200%
Total
Payout Earned
(as a percentage
of Target)
136.8%
As discussed above, the MD&C Committee has discretion to adjust the performance calculations in line with its policy on
calculation adjustments. The MD&C Committee did not make any adjustments to the calculation of 2021 annual cash
incentive performance measures. For purposes of our annual cash incentive awards, the income from operations,
excluding depreciation and amortization performance measure and the Margin performance measure are generally
defined to be calculated based on the Company’s reported income from operations, excluding depreciation and
amortization, “Restructuring” and “(Gain) Loss from Divestitures, Asset Impairments and Unusual Items, Net” reported in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Target annual cash incentives are a specified percentage of the executives’ base salary. The following table shows each
named executive’s target percentage of base salary for 2021 and annual cash incentive for 2021 paid in March 2022.
Named Executive Officer
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Target Percentage
of Base Salary
Annual Cash Incentive
For 2021(1)
150
100
100
75
90
$2,656,497
$ 958,821
$ 996,408
$ 663,727
$ 721,549
(1) Calculations of annual cash incentive payouts, as a percentage of base salary, were made using the named
executive’s actual base salary received in 2021. Such amounts are lower than if calculated using the 2021
base salaries in the table above due to the timing of when base salary increases take effect.
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Our equity awards are designed to hold individuals accountable for long-term decisions by rewarding the success of
those decisions. The MD&C Committee continuously evaluates the components of its programs. In determining which
forms of equity compensation are appropriate, the MD&C Committee considers whether the awards granted are achieving
their purpose; the competitive market; and accounting, tax or other regulatory issues, among others. In determining the
appropriate awards for the named executives’ 2021 annual long-term incentive award, the MD&C Committee decided to
grant both PSUs comprising 80% of each named executive’s award and stock options comprising 20% of each named
executive’s award, consistent with prior years. Half of each named executives’ PSUs granted in 2021 are Cash Flow PSUs
and the remaining half are TSR PSUs. Meanwhile, stock options encourage focus on increasing the market value of our
stock. Before determining the actual number of PSUs and stock options that were granted to each of the named
executives in 2021, the MD&C Committee established a target dollar amount for each named executive’s annual total
long-term equity incentive award. The values chosen were based primarily on the comparison information for the
competitive market and consideration of the named executives’ responsibility for meeting the Company’s strategic
objectives. Target dollar amounts for equity incentive awards will vary from grant date fair values calculated for
accounting purposes.
2022 Proxy Statement | 33
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Named Executive Officer
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher(1)
Ms. Hemmer
Dollar Values of 2021
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Set by the Committee
(at Target)
$8,500,000
$2,100,000
$2,300,000
$1,300,000
$1,700,000
(1) Amount does not include Mr. Boettcher’s ADS Closing Award discussed below under “Restricted Stock
Units”.
Overview of Performance Share Units.
• Named executives were granted new PSUs with a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2023. Half of
each named executive’s PSUs granted in 2021 are Cash Flow PSUs and the remaining half are TSR PSUs.
• Named executives received a payout of 183.89% of the PSUs granted in 2019 with a three-year performance period
ended December 31, 2021. The Company exceeded the maximum level of performance for the Cash Flow PSUs, and
the Company exceeded the target level of performance for the TSR PSUs.
PSUs Granted in 2021. Performance share units are granted to our named executive officers annually to align
compensation with the achievement of our long-term financial goals and to increase stockholder alignment through
stock ownership. PSUs provide an immediate retention benefit to the Company because there is unvested potential value
at the date of grant. The number of PSUs granted to our named executive officers corresponds to an equal number of
shares of Common Stock. At the end of the three-year performance period for each grant, the Company will deliver a
number of shares ranging from 0% to 200% of the initial number of PSUs granted, depending on the Company’s three-
year performance against pre-established targets.
The MD&C Committee determined the number of PSUs that were granted to each of the named executives in 2021 by
taking the targeted dollar amounts established for total long-term equity incentives (set forth in the table above) and
multiplying by 80%. Those values were then divided by the average of the high and low market price of our Common
Stock over the 30 trading days preceding the grant date to determine the number of PSUs granted. The number of PSUs
granted in 2021 are shown in the table below.
Named Executive Officer
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Number
of PSUs
59,650
14,736
16,140
9,122
11,930
Half of each named executive’s PSUs included in the table above are Cash Flow PSUs; the cash flow generation
performance measure requires focus on capital discipline and strengthens alignment with stockholders’ free cash flow
expectations. For purposes of these PSUs, we define cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities, less capital
expenditures, with the following adjustments: (a) costs associated with labor disruptions and multiemployer plan
withdrawal liabilities are excluded due to being required as a result of past labor commitments combined with changing
economic conditions and business climate; (b) strategic acquisition, restructuring, and transformation and reorganization
costs are excluded; (c) cash proceeds from strategic divestitures of assets and businesses are excluded; and (d) cash
proceeds from divestitures of any other businesses and assets are included (the “2021 Cash Flow PSU Definition”). The
table below shows the required achievement of the cash flow generation performance measure and the corresponding
potential payouts under our Cash Flow PSUs granted in 2021.
Cash Flow
$6.60 billion
50% $7.032 billion
100% $7.50 billion
200%
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Performance
Payout
Performance
Payout
Performance
Payout
34 |
2022 Proxy Statement
The remaining half of each named executive’s PSUs are TSR PSUs. This measure directly correlates executive
compensation with creation of stockholder value. Total shareholder return is calculated as follows: (Common Stock price
at end of performance period — Common Stock price at beginning of performance period + dividends during performance
period) / Common Stock price at beginning of performance period. The table below shows the required achievement of
the total shareholder return performance measure and the corresponding potential payouts under our TSR PSUs granted
in 2021.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Total Shareholder Return Relative to the S&P 500
Performance
75th percentile (Maximum)
50th percentile (Target)
25th percentile (Threshold)
Payout
200%
100%
50%
The different performance measure levels are determined based on an analysis of historical performance and current
projections and trends. The MD&C Committee uses this analysis and consideration of different scenarios related to items
that affect the Company’s performance such as yield, volumes and capital to set the performance measures. As with the
consideration of targets for the annual cash incentives, when the MD&C Committee established the cash flow targets, the
MD&C Committee carefully considered several material factors anticipated to affect the Company in 2021 and beyond,
including general economic and market conditions and economic indicators for future periods, to align the cash flow
targets with the Company’s long-range strategic plan.
Payout on PSUs for the Performance Period Ended December 31, 2021. Half of the PSUs granted in 2019 with the
performance period ended December 31, 2021 were TSR PSUs, and the remaining half of the PSUs granted in 2019 were
Cash Flow PSUs. In line with the MD&C Committee’s policy on calculation adjustments discussed above, no adjustments
were made to the performance calculations for these PSUs. With respect to the TSR PSUs with a three-year performance
period ended December 31, 2021, the performance of the Company’s Common Stock on this measure translated into
a percentile rank relative to the S&P 500 of 66.95%, resulting in a 167.78% payout in shares of Common Stock that were
issued in February 2022.
For purposes of the Cash Flow PSUs with a three-year performance period ended December 31, 2021, the Company
generated net cash flow from operating activities, less capital expenditures, of $7.49 billion, exceeding the maximum
criteria of $6.875 billion by $615 million; this performance level yielded a 200% payout in shares of Common Stock that
were issued in February 2022. With respect to these Cash Flow PSUs, the underlying award agreements provide for
performance to be measured using the same methodology as the 2021 Cash Flow PSU Definition set forth above, except
that these 2019 awards did not provide for exclusion of cash proceeds from strategic divestitures of assets and
businesses. In 2020, the Company received approximately $691 million of after-tax proceeds on account of government-
required divestitures in connection with our acquisition of ADS. As the Company exceeded maximum performance criteria
by $615 million, only approximately $75 million of the total $691 million divestiture proceeds discussed above benefited
the award payout for the 2019 Cash Flow PSUs. The remainder of such proceeds were in excess of maximum
performance criteria and did not yield any additional award payout.
Stock Options. The MD&C Committee believes use of stock options is appropriate to support the growth element of the
Company’s strategy. The grant of options made to the named executive officers in the first quarter of 2021 in connection
with the annual grant of long-term equity awards was based on the targeted dollar amounts established for total
long-term equity incentives (set forth in the table above) and multiplied by 20%. The actual number of stock options
granted was determined by assigning a value to the options using an option pricing model and dividing the dollar value of
target compensation by the value of an option. The resulting number of stock options are shown in the table below.
Named Executive Officer
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Number
of Options
98,551
24,348
26,667
15,072
19,710
2022 Proxy Statement | 35
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The stock options granted in 2021 vest ratably in three annual increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the date
of grant. The exercise price of the options granted in 2021 is $110.81, which is the average of the high and low market
price of our Common Stock on the date of grant, and the options have a term of ten years. We account for our employee
stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes methodology to measure stock option
expense at the date of grant. The fair value of the stock options at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the
vesting period less expected forfeitures, except for stock options granted to retirement-eligible employees, for which
expense is fully recognized at the time of grant.
Restricted Stock Units. Mr. Boettcher was the only named executive with unvested RSUs as of December 31, 2021.
Mr. Boettcher received a grant of 4,386 RSUs in connection with the ADS transaction in February 2021, as the MD&C
Committee desired to recognize his leadership and contributions critical to the negotiation and consummation of the
acquisition in October 2020. These ADS Closing Award RSUs will vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
Dividends on the RSUs will accrue and be paid in cash upon vesting. The RSUs may not be voted or sold until vested.
Unvested RSUs are subject to forfeiture in the event of voluntary or for-cause termination. RSUs will be prorated upon
involuntary termination other than for cause, and RSUs immediately vest in the event of an employee’s death or disability.
The MD&C Committee anticipates that grants of RSUs to named executives will continue to be made on a limited basis in
cases such as a significant promotion, increased responsibilities, special recognition and to attract new hires, and that
RSUs will not be a routine component of named executive compensation. See “2022 Compensation Program Preview” in
the Executive Summary above regarding the ADS Integration Awards of RSUs granted to Ms. Rankin, Mr. Morris and
Ms. Hemmer in 2022.
Post-Employment and Change in Control Compensation; Clawback Policies
Severance Protection Plan.
In December 2017, we adopted an Executive Severance Protection Plan (the “Severance
Protection Plan”) and each of Messrs. Fish, Morris, Boettcher and Ms. Rankin entered into new or amended and restated
employment agreements (the “2017 Employment Agreements”). The Severance Protection Plan covers each of our
executive officers. The 2017 Employment Agreements do not contain separate severance entitlements, but instead
provide for additional terms and protections relating to the respective executive’s participation in the Severance
Protection Plan. The 2017 Employment Agreements are intended to transition the Company’s severance protections
away from contract-based protections and onto a standardized and flexible plan-based approach. Going forward, the
Company does not anticipate entering into new employment agreements with our executive officers, and Ms. Hemmer is
not party to an employment agreement with the Company.
Post-Employment Covenants and Clawback Policies. The 2017 Employment Agreements contain noncompetition and
nonsolicitation restrictions that apply during employment and for a two-year period following termination. Additionally,
the Severance Protection Plan contains (a) a requirement that the individual execute a general release prior to receiving
post-termination benefits and (b) a clawback feature that allows for the suspension and refund of termination benefits
for subsequently discovered cause. The clawback feature generally allows the Company to cancel any remaining
payments due and obligates the named executive to refund to the Company severance payments already made if, within
one year of termination of employment of the named executive by the Company for any reason other than for cause, the
Company determines that the named executive could have been terminated for cause.
Our current equity award agreements also include a requirement that, in order to be eligible to vest in any portion of the
award, the employee must enter into an agreement containing restrictive covenants applicable to the employee’s
behavior following termination. Additionally, our equity award agreements include compensation clawback provisions
that provide, if the MD&C Committee determines that an employee either engaged in or benefited from misconduct, then
the employee will refund any amounts received under the equity award agreements. Misconduct generally includes any
act or failure to act that caused or was intended to cause a violation of the Company’s policies, generally accepted
accounting principles or applicable laws and that materially increased the value of the equity award. Further, our MD&C
Committee has adopted a clawback policy applicable to our annual cash incentive awards that is designed to recoup
annual cash incentive payments when the recipient’s personal misconduct affects the payout calculations for the awards.
Clawback terms applicable to our incentive awards allow recovery within the earlier to occur of one year after discovery
of misconduct and the second anniversary of the employee’s termination of employment.
36 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Other Compensation Policies and Practices
Compensation Limitation Policies. The Company has adopted a Severance Limitation Policy that generally provides that
the Company may not enter into severance arrangements with its executive officers, as defined in the federal securities
laws, that provide for benefits, less the value of vested equity awards and benefits provided to employees generally, in an
amount that exceeds 2.99 times the executive officer’s then current base salary and target annual cash incentive, unless
such future severance arrangement receives stockholder approval. The Company has also adopted its Policy Limiting
Certain Compensation Practices, which generally provides that the Company will not enter into compensation
arrangements that would obligate the Company to pay a death benefit or gross-up payment to an executive officer unless
such arrangement receives stockholder approval. Both of these compensation limitation policies are subject to certain
exceptions, including benefits generally available to management-level employees and any payment in reasonable
settlement of a legal claim. Additionally, “Death Benefits” under the policy does not include deferred compensation,
retirement benefits or accelerated vesting or continuation of equity-based awards pursuant to generally-applicable equity
award plan provisions. None of our executive officers are party to any employment agreement or arrangement with the
Company that provides for severance, gross-up or death benefits that exceed amounts permitted by these compensation
limitation policies.
Stock Ownership Guidelines and Holding Requirements. All of our named executive officers are subject to stock ownership
guidelines. We instituted stock ownership guidelines because we believe that ownership of Company stock demonstrates
a commitment to, and confidence in, the Company’s long-term prospects and further aligns employees’ interests with
those of our stockholders. We believe that the requirement that these individuals maintain a portion of their individual
wealth in the form of Company stock deters actions that would not benefit stockholders generally. Although there is no
deadline set for senior executives to reach their ownership guidelines, the MD&C Committee monitors ownership levels
to confirm that executives are making sustained progress toward achievement of their ownership guidelines. Additionally,
our stock ownership guidelines contain holding requirements. Executives with a title of Senior Vice President or higher,
which includes all of our named executives, must hold 100% of all net shares acquired through the Company’s long-term
incentive plans until the individual’s ownership guideline is achieved. Once achieved, the requisite stock ownership level
must continue to be retained throughout the executive’s employment with the Company.
The MD&C Committee regularly reviews the ownership guidelines to ensure that the appropriate share ownership levels
are in place. Guidelines are expressed as a multiple of base salary. Each named executive’s multiple of base salary and
attainment as of March 15, 2022, using the closing price of our Common Stock on such date and base salaries in effect on
December 31, 2021, are set forth below. Shares owned outright, vested RSUs and PSUs that have been deferred, Common
Stock equivalents based on holdings in the Company’s 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan and phantom stock held in the
Company’s 409A Deferral Plan count toward meeting the ownership guidelines. Stock options, PSUs, RSUs and restricted
stock, if any, do not count toward meeting the ownership guidelines until they are vested or earned.
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Ownership
Guideline Multiple
of Base Salary
Attainment as of
March 15, 2022
6x
3x
3x
3x
3x
488%
363%
778%
252%
330%
As discussed under “Director and Officer Stock Ownership,” the MD&C Committee also establishes ownership guidelines
for the non-employee directors and performs regular reviews to ensure all non-employee directors are in compliance or
are showing sustained progress toward achievement of their ownership guideline.
2022 Proxy Statement | 37
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Insider Trading; Prohibition of Hedging and Pledging Company Securities. The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits
directors, executive officers and other “designated insiders” from engaging in most transactions involving the Company’s
Common Stock during periods, determined by the Company, that those individuals are most likely to be aware of material,
non-public information. Directors, executive officers and other designated insiders subject to stock ownership guidelines
must clear all their transactions in our Common Stock with the Company’s office of the Chief Legal Officer in advance.
Additionally, it is our policy that directors, executive officers and designated insiders are not permitted to hedge their
ownership of Company securities, including (a) trading in options, warrants, puts and calls or similar derivative
instruments on any security of the Company, (b) selling any security of the Company “short” and (c) purchasing any
financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or
otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to or have the effect of offsetting any decrease in the market value
of any security of the Company granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the director, executive officer
or designated insider. The Company’s Insider Trading Policy also provides that directors and executive officers may not
pledge Company securities or hold Company securities in a margin account.
38 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
We are required to present compensation information in the tabular format prescribed by the SEC. This format, including
the tables’ column headings, may be different from the way we describe or consider elements and components of
compensation internally. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains a discussion that should be read in
conjunction with these tables to gain a complete understanding of our executive compensation philosophy, programs
and decisions.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Year
James C. Fish, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
2021
2020
2019
Devina A. Rankin
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2021
2020
2019
John J. Morris, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
2021
2020
2019
Charles C. Boettcher
Executive Vice President — Corporate Development
and Chief Legal Officer
Salary
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
1,294,231(5) 7,312,195 1,700,005
1,269,231(5) 8,110,592 1,600,003
1,232,788(5) 6,853,530 1,399,997
2,656,497
1,277,922
1,704,132
94,435
13,057,363
116,177
12,373,925
107,654
11,298,101
700,671
1,806,413
420,003
677,061
2,027,801
399,993
618,208
1,958,118
399,997
958,821
456,597
578,516
728,138
1,978,522
460,006
712,115
2,230,520
440,002
699,807
2,153,907
440,006
996,408
479,777
661,476
56,094
60,493
68,575
67,420
99,517
86,046
3,942,002
3,621,945
3,623,414
4,230,494
3,961,930
4,041,242
2021
646,702
1,604,233
259,992
663,727
46,927
3,221,581
Tara J. Hemmer
Senior Vice President and Chief Sustainability Officer
2021
2020
2019
585,868
1,462,439
339,998
567,062
1,672,967
330,005
535,670
1,615,372
330,001
721,549
347,774
479,828
45,601
57,125
38,502
3,155,455
2,974,933
2,999,373
(1) Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of PSUs granted to all named executives annually and
4,386 ADS Closing Award RSUs granted to Mr. Boettcher in 2021. The grant date fair values were calculated in
accordance with ASC Topic 718, as further described in Note 14 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of a TSR PSU granted in 2021, based
on a Monte Carlo valuation, is $134.36, and because total shareholder return is a market condition, projected
achievement is embedded in the grant date fair value. The grant date fair value of a Cash Flow PSU granted in 2021,
and an ADS Closing Award RSU, is $110.81, which is the average of the high and low market price of our Common
Stock on the date of the grant, in accordance with our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. The table below shows (a) the
aggregate grant date fair value of Cash Flow PSUs assuming target level of performance is achieved (this is the
amount included in the Stock Awards column in the Summary Compensation Table) and (b) the aggregate grant
date fair value of the same PSUs assuming the Company will reach the highest level of achievement for this
performance measure and maximum payouts will be earned.
2022 Proxy Statement | 39
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
Aggregate Grant Date
Fair Value of Cash
Flow PSUs
Assuming Target
Level of Performance
Achieved ($)
Aggregate Grant Date
Fair Value of Cash
Flow PSUs
Assuming Highest
Level of Performance
Achieved ($)
3,304,908
3,332,328
2,914,920
816,448
833,145
832,820
894,237
916,434
916,092
505,404
660,982
687,357
687,044
6,609,817
6,664,656
5,829,840
1,632,896
1,666,290
1,665,640
1,788,473
1,832,869
1,832,184
1,010,808
1,321,963
1,374,715
1,374,088
Year
2021
2020
2019
2021
2020
2019
2021
2020
2019
2021
2021
2020
2019
(2) Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of stock options granted annually, in accordance with
ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the options granted in 2021, estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model, is $17.25 per option. See Note 14 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2021
Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
(3) Amounts in this column represent cash incentive awards earned and paid based on the achievement of performance
criteria. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Named Executive’s 2021 Compensation Program and
Results — Annual Cash Incentive” for additional information.
(4) The amounts included in “All Other Compensation” for 2021 are shown below (in dollars):
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris
Mr. Boettcher
Ms. Hemmer
401(k)
Plan Matching
Contributions
409A
Deferral
Plan
Matching
Contributions
Life Insurance
Premiums
13,050
13,050
13,050
13,050
13,050
38,731
41,788
26,572
32,709
31,492
2,145
1,256
1,313
1,168
1,059
Perquisites
and Other
Personal
Benefits(a)
40,509
—
26,485
—
—
(a) This column consists of incremental cost to us for personal use of Company aircraft. Annually, we calculate
an hourly direct operating cost for Company aircraft using industry standard measurements of costs for
fuel, catering, telecommunications, maintenance, landing and hangar fees, flight plans and permits, and
crew. We then allocate incremental cost to the named executive based on the amount of aircraft time
required for the personal use, multiplied by the direct operating cost. When a deviation is made from
business travel to pick up or drop off the executive in another location for a personal purpose, we calculate
the time difference resulting from the flight plan deviation and multiply it by the direct operating cost. We
also allocate incremental cost to the named executive in the rare event that a deadhead flight is required
to position the aircraft to serve personal needs. We own and operate our aircraft primarily for business
use; therefore, we do not include purchase costs or other fixed costs associated with our aircraft in the
direct operating cost.
(5)
Includes $100,000 in each of 2021 and 2020 and $75,000 in 2019 of base salary to which Mr. Fish was entitled but
voluntarily relinquished to fund a scholarship program for children of Company employees.
40 |
2022 Proxy Statement
GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2021
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Grant Date
James C. Fish, Jr.
Cash Incentive 1,165,130 1,941,883 3,883,767
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
Target
(#)
Threshold
(#)
Maximum
(#)
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
All other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)(3)
All other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(#)(4)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/sh)(5)
Closing
Market
Price on
Date of
Grant
($/sh)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(6)
29,825 59,650 119,300
98,551
7,312,195
110.81 109.92 1,700,005
2/23/21
2/23/21
Devina A. Rankin
Cash Incentive
2/23/21
2/23/21
420,536
John J. Morris, Jr.
Cash Incentive
2/23/21
2/23/21
437,021
291,108
Charles C. Boettcher
Cash Incentive
2/23/21
2/23/21
2/23/21
700,893 1,401,787
7,368 14,736
29,472
728,368 1,456,737
8,070 16,140
32,280
485,180
970,360
4,561
9,122
18,244
Tara J. Hemmer
Cash Incentive
2/23/21
2/23/21
316,469
527,448 1,054,897
5,965 11,930
23,860
24,348
110.81 109.92
26,667
110.81 109.92
15,072
110.81 109.92
4,386
19,710
110.81 109.92
1,806,413
420,003
1,978,522
460,006
1,118,220
259,992
486,013
1,462,439
339,998
(1) Actual payouts of cash incentive awards for 2021 performance are shown in the Summary Compensation Table
under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” The named executives’ possible annual cash incentive payouts
are calculated using a percentage of base salary approved by the MD&C Committee. The threshold levels represent
the amounts that would have been payable if the minimum performance criteria were met for each performance
measure. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Named Executive’s 2021 Compensation Program and
Results — Annual Cash Incentive” for additional information about these awards.
(2) Consists of the number of shares of Common Stock potentially issuable based on the achievement of performance
criteria under PSU awards granted under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis — Named
Results — Long-Term Equity
Incentives — Performance Share Units” for additional information about these awards. The performance period for
these awards ends December 31, 2023. PSUs earn dividend equivalents, which are paid out based on the number of
shares earned at the end of the performance period.
Program and
Compensation
Executive’s
2021
(3) Consists of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the vesting of the ADS Closing Award RSUs
granted under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. These RSUs vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Named Executive’s 2021 Compensation Program and
Results — Long-Term Equity Incentives — Restricted Stock Units” for additional information about this award.
(4) Consists of the number of shares of Common Stock potentially issuable upon the exercise of options granted under
our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Named Executive’s 2021
Compensation Program and Results — Long-Term Equity Incentives — Stock Options” for additional information
about these awards. Stock options vest ratably in three annual increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the
date of grant. Although we consider stock options to be a form of incentive compensation, only awards with
performance criteria are included as “Equity Incentive Plan Awards” in our compensation tables.
(5) The exercise price represents the average of the high and low market price of our Common Stock on the date of the
grant, in accordance with our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.
(6) These amounts are grant date fair values of the awards as calculated under ASC Topic 718 and as further described
in notes (1) and (2) to the Summary Compensation Table.
2022 Proxy Statement | 41
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2021
Option Awards
Stock Awards(1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)(2)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(6)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(6)
Name
James C. Fish, Jr.
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(7)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(7)
—
25,284
—
98,551(3)
75,854(4)
57,283(5)
110.81
126.005
2/23/2031
2/19/2030
98.898
2/19/2029
— 112,542
—
—
37,566,520
—
Devina A. Rankin
John J. Morris, Jr.
—
6,321
—
—
6,953
9,002
Charles C. Boettcher
Tara J. Hemmer
—
4,108
10,638
—
5,215
13,502
24,348(3)
18,963(4)
16,367(5)
26,667(3)
20,860(4)
18,004(5)
15,072(3)
12,327(4)
10,639(5)
19,710(3)
15,645(4)
13,503(5)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
110.81
126.005
98.898
2/23/2031
2/19/2030
2/19/2029
110.81
126.005
98.898
2/23/2031
2/19/2030
2/19/2029
110.81
126.005
98.898
2/23/2031
2/19/2030
2/19/2029
4,386
—
—
732,023
—
—
110.81
126.005
98.898
2/23/2031
2/19/2030
2/19/2029
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
27,960
—
—
9,333,048
—
—
30,686
—
—
10,242,987
—
—
17,718
—
—
22,840
—
—
5,914,268
—
—
7,623,992
—
—
(1) Values are based on the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2021 of $166.90.
(2)
(3)
(4)
Includes vested stock options granted on February 19, 2019 and February 19, 2020 pursuant to our 2014 Stock
Incentive Plan.
Includes stock options granted on February 23, 2021 that vest ratably in three annual increments, beginning on the
first anniversary of the date of grant.
Includes stock options granted on February 19, 2020 that vested 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant. An
additional 25% will vest on the second anniversary of the date of grant and 50% will vest on the third anniversary of
the date of grant.
(5)
Includes stock options granted on February 19, 2019 that vested 25% on the first and second anniversary of the date
of grant. The remaining 50% will vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
42 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(6)
(7)
Includes the ADS Closing Award RSUs granted to Mr. Boettcher on February 23, 2021 under our 2014 Stock Incentive
Plan. The RSUs vest in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
Includes PSUs with three-year performance periods ending December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023. Payouts on
PSUs are made after the Company’s financial results for the performance period are reported and the MD&C
Committee determines achievement of performance results and corresponding vesting, typically in February of the
succeeding year. The PSUs for the performance period ended December 31, 2021 are not included in the table as
they are considered earned as of December 31, 2021 for proxy statement disclosure purposes; instead, such PSUs
are included in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below. Pursuant to SEC disclosure instructions, because
the Company’s performance on the metrics governing our PSUs with the performance period ended December 31,
2021 exceeded target, the payout value of unearned awards is calculated assuming maximum performance criteria
is achieved. The following number of PSUs have a performance period ending December 31, 2022: Mr. Fish — 52,892;
Ms. Rankin — 13,224; Mr. Morris — 14,546; Mr. Boettcher — 8,596; and Ms. Hemmer — 10,910. The following number
of PSUs have a performance period ending December 31, 2023: Mr. Fish — 59,650; Ms. Rankin — 14,736;
Mr. Morris — 16,140; Mr. Boettcher — 9,122; and Ms. Hemmer — 11,930.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
Name
James C. Fish, Jr.
Devina A. Rankin
John J. Morris, Jr.
Charles C. Boettcher
Tara J. Hemmer
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise(#)(1)
Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)(2)
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)(2)
106,625
44,327
14,803
46,918
16,447
5,105,012
2,873,915
379,054
3,335,416
1,048,127
108,399
30,971
34,067
20,096
25,550
15,459,399
4,416,951
4,858,489
2,866,005
3,643,831
(1) The following number of net shares were received, after withholdings and the sale of shares to cover option costs
and taxes: Mr. Fish — 22,037; Ms. Rankin — 11,212; Mr. Morris — 2,072; Mr. Boettcher — 13,561; and
Ms. Hemmer — 4,261.
(2)
Includes shares of the Company’s Common Stock issued on account of PSUs granted in 2019 with a performance
period ended December 31, 2021. The determination of achievement of performance results and corresponding
vesting of such PSUs was performed by the MD&C Committee in February 2022. Following such determination,
shares of the Company’s Common Stock earned under this award were issued on February 15, 2022, based on the
average of the high and low market price of our Common Stock on that date.
2022 Proxy Statement | 43
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021
Amounts that Can be Deferred. Under our 409A Deferral Plan, each of our named executive officers may elect to defer
receipt of portions of their base salary and annual cash incentives for the applicable fiscal year in excess of the annual
compensation threshold (the “Threshold”) established under Section 401(a)(17) of IRC. For 2021, the Threshold was
$290,000. Such deferrals will result in a deferral of taxation on the amounts deferred. The 409A Deferral Plan provides
that a plan participant may defer, for payment at a future date (a) up to 25% of the participant’s base salary, and up to
100% of the participant’s annual cash incentives, payable after the aggregate of such base salary and annual cash
incentives reaches the Threshold; (b) any RSUs that would otherwise be received by the plan participant; and (c) any
PSUs that would otherwise be received by the plan participant.
Matching Contributions. The Company match provided under the 409A Deferral Plan is dollar for dollar on the employee’s
deferrals, up to 3% of the employee’s aggregate base salary and cash incentives in excess of the Threshold, and fifty
cents on the dollar on the employee’s deferrals, in excess of 3% and up to 6% of the employee’s aggregate base salary
and cash incentives in excess of the Threshold. Additional deferral contributions will not be matched but will be tax-
deferred. Amounts deferred under this plan are allocated into accounts that mirror selected investment funds in our
401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, including a Company stock fund, although the amounts deferred are not actually invested
in stock or funds. There is no Company match on deferred RSUs or PSUs, but the Company makes a cash payment of
dividend equivalents on the shares deferred at the same time and at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s
Common Stock.
Timing of Distributions. Participating employees generally can elect to receive distributions commencing six months
after the employee leaves the Company in the form of annual installments or a lump sum payment. Special circumstances
may allow for a modified or accelerated distribution, such as the employee’s death, an unforeseen emergency, or upon
termination of the plan. In the event of death, distribution will be made to the designated beneficiary in a single lump sum
in the following calendar year. In the event of an unforeseen emergency, the plan administrator may allow an early
payment in the amount necessary to satisfy the emergency. All participants are immediately 100% vested in all of their
contributions, Company matching contributions, and gains and/or losses related to their investment choices
Name
James C. Fish, Jr.
Devina A. Rankin
John J. Morris, Jr.
Charles C. Boettcher
Tara J. Hemmer
Executive
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal
Year ($)(1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last
Fiscal
Year ($)(2)
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last
Fiscal
Year ($)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions ($)(3)
Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal
Year End ($)(4)
48,413
52,036
35,430
40,575
57,623
38,731
41,788
26,572
32,709
31,492
5,140,175
218,141
18,382,929
91,852
527,655
66,311
77,883
—
—
—
—
641,920
2,696,489
515,684
613,737
(1) Contributions are made pursuant to the Company’s 409A Deferral Plan. Executive contributions of base salary and
annual cash incentive compensation is included in the Salary column and the Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation column, respectively, of the Summary Compensation Table.
(2) Company contributions to the executives’ 409A Deferral Plan accounts are included in the All Other Compensation
column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3) Earnings on these accounts are not included in any other amounts in the tables included in this Proxy Statement, as
the amounts of the named executives’ earnings on deferred cash compensation represent the general market gains
(or losses) on investments, rather than amounts or rates set by the Company for the benefit of the named executives.
In the case of Mr. Fish, who has deferred receipt of a total of 94,844 shares of Common Stock in prior years, earnings
also include the change in the closing price per share of the Company’s Common Stock from December 31, 2020 to
December 31, 2021, plus $2.30 of dividend equivalents paid per share of Common Stock in 2021, multiplied by the
number of shares deferred. The dividend equivalents on the deferred shares were paid in cash to Mr. Fish during
2021 and are reflected in the Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions column above. The value of Mr. Fish’s deferred
shares was included in the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table in the years such awards vested.
(4) Amounts shown in this column include the following amounts that were reported as compensation to the named
executive in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019-2021: Mr. Fish — $592,656; Ms. Rankin — $271,326;
44 |
2022 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Mr. Morris — $204,817; and Ms. Hemmer — $261,526. With respect to Mr. Boettcher, who became a named executive
in 2021, $73,284 of his total amount shown in this column was reported as compensation in the Summary
Compensation Table for 2021.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Change in Control. The post-employment compensation our named executives receive is based on provisions included
in retirement and severance plan documents, employment agreements and equity incentive award documentation.
Severance protections aid in retention of senior leadership by providing the individual with comfort that he or she will be
treated fairly in the event of an involuntary termination not for cause. The change in control provisions included in the
Severance Protection Plan, our stock option award agreements and, if applicable, employment agreements require a
double trigger in order to receive any payment in the event of a change in control situation. First, a change in control must
occur, and second, the individual must terminate employment for good reason or the Company must terminate
employment without cause within six months prior to or two years following the change in control event. PSUs are paid
out in cash on a prorated basis based on actual results achieved through the end of the fiscal quarter prior to a change in
control. Thereafter, the executive would typically receive a replacement award from the successor entity, provided that
the successor entity is publicly traded. If the successor is not publicly traded, the executive will be entitled to a
replacement award of cash. RSUs, which are not routinely a component of our named executive officer compensation,
vest upon a change in control, unless the successor entity converts the awards to equivalent grants in the successor. In
the case of both converted RSU and PSU awards, they will vest in full if the executive is terminated without cause
following the change in control. We believe providing change in control protection encourages our named executives to
pursue and facilitate transactions that are in the best interests of stockholders while not granting executives an
undeserved windfall.
Involuntary Termination or Resignation for Good Reason. Under the Severance Protection Plan, in the event a participant
is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, subject to execution of a release of claims and continued
compliance with all restrictive covenants, he or she will be entitled to receive: (a) cash severance in an aggregate amount
equal to two times the sum of the participant’s base salary and target annual bonus (with one half payable in a lump sum
at termination, and the remaining half payable in installments over a two-year period); (b) continuation of group health
benefits over a two-year period following termination and (c) a pro rata annual cash incentive payment for the year of
termination. In the event a named executive is terminated for cause, he or she is entitled to any accrued but unpaid salary
only, and all unvested awards and outstanding stock options, whether exercisable or not, are forfeited.
The terms “cause,” “good reason,” and “change in control” are defined in the executives’ employment agreements, the
Severance Protection Plan and equity award plans and agreements, as applicable, but such terms have the meanings
generally described below. You should refer to the applicable documentation, accessible through the Exhibit List to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the full definitions.
“Cause” generally means the named executive has: deliberately refused to perform his or her duties; breached his
or her duty of loyalty to the Company; been convicted of a felony; intentionally and materially harmed the Company;
materially violated the Company’s policies and procedures or breached the covenants contained in his or her
agreement.
“Good Reason” generally means that, without the named executive’s consent: his or her duties or responsibilities
have been substantially changed; he or she has been removed from his or her position; the Company has breached
his or her employment agreement; any successor to the Company has not assumed the obligations under his or her
employment agreement; or he or she has been reassigned to a location more than 50 miles away.
“Change in Control” generally means that: at least 25% of the Company’s Common Stock has been acquired by one
person or persons acting as a group; certain significant turnover in our Board of Directors has occurred; there has
been a merger of the Company in which at least 50% of the combined post-merger voting power of the surviving
entity does not consist of the Company’s pre-merger voting power, or a merger to effect a recapitalization that
resulted in a person or persons acting as a group acquired 25% or more of the Company’s voting securities; or the
Company is liquidating or selling all or substantially all of its assets.
Benefits to a participant under the Severance Protection Plan are subject to reduction to the extent required by the
Company’s Severance Limitation Policy or if the excise tax described in Sections 280G or 4999 of the IRC is applicable
and such reduction would place the participant in a better net after tax position.
2022 Proxy Statement | 45
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Voluntary Termination; Retirement. Our equity award agreements generally provide that an executive forfeits unvested
awards if he or she voluntarily terminates employment. RSUs and PSUs generally vest on a pro rata basis upon
involuntary termination other than for cause. RSUs, PSUs and stock options generally continue to vest following a
qualifying retirement as if the employee had remained employed until the end of the performance period. If the recipient
is terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily resigns, the recipient is entitled to exercise all stock options
outstanding and exercisable within a specified time frame after such termination.
Explanation of Tabular Disclosure. The following table presents potential payouts to our named executives at year-end
upon termination of employment in the circumstances indicated pursuant to the terms of applicable plans and
agreements. The payouts set forth below assume the triggering event indicated occurred on December 31, 2021, when
the closing price of our Common Stock was $166.90 per share. These payouts are calculated for SEC disclosure purposes
and are not necessarily indicative of the actual amounts the named executive would receive. Please note the following
when reviewing the payouts set forth below:
• The compensation component set forth below for accelerated vesting of stock options is comprised of the
unvested stock options granted in 2019, 2020 and 2021, based on the difference between the closing price of our
Common Stock on December 31, 2021 and the exercise price of those options.
• For purposes of calculating the payout of performance share unit awards outstanding as of December 31, 2021,
we have assumed that target performance was achieved; actual performance share unit payouts will be based on
actual performance of the Company during the performance period.
• For purposes of calculating the payout upon the “double trigger” of change in control and subsequent involuntary
termination not for cause, the value of the performance share unit replacement award is equal to the number of
PSUs that would be forfeited based on the prorated acceleration of the PSUs, multiplied by the closing price of our
Common Stock on December 31, 2021.
• The payout for continuation of benefits is an estimate of the cost the Company would incur to continue those
benefits.
• The Company’s practice is to provide all benefits eligible employees with life insurance that pays one times annual
base salary upon death. The insurance benefit is a payment by an insurance company, not the Company, and is
payable under the terms of the insurance policy.
• Refer to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2021 table above for aggregate balances payable to the
named executives under our 409A Deferral Plan pursuant to the named executive’s distribution elections.
46 |
2022 Proxy Statement
Potential Consideration Upon Termination of Employment
Mr. Fish
Ms. Rankin
Mr. Morris Mr. Boettcher Ms. Hemmer
Payout or Value of Compensation Components, in dollars
In Event of Death or Disability
• Accelerated vesting of stock options
• Payment of PSUs (contingent on actual
12,525,134
3,254,160
3,573,130
2,072,974
2,663,567
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
performance at end of performance period)
• Accelerated vesting of RSUs
• Life insurance benefit paid by insurance company
(in the case of death)
Total
In Event of Termination Without Cause by the
Company or For Good Reason by the Employee
• Two times base salary plus target annual cash
bonus (one-half payable in lump sum; one-half
payable in bi-weekly installments over a two-year
period)
• Continued coverage under health and welfare
18,783,260
—
4,666,524
—
5,121,493
—
2,957,134
732,023
3,811,996
—
1,175,000
32,483,394
689,000
8,609,684
716,000
576,000
636,000
9,410,623 6,398,131 7,051,563
6,500,000
2,816,988
2,927,416
2,275,011
2,237,660
benefit plans for two years
28,416
28,416
28,416
28,416
28,416
• Prorated payment of PSUs (contingent on actual
performance at end of performance period)
• Prorated vesting of RSUs
Total
In Event of Termination Without Cause by the
Company or For Good Reason by the Employee
Six Months Following a Change in Control
(Double Trigger)
• Two times base salary plus target annual cash
bonus (one-half payable in lump sum; one-half
payable in bi-weekly installments over a
two-year period)
• Continued coverage under health and welfare
benefit plans for two years
• Accelerated vesting of stock options
• Prorated accelerated payment of PSUs
• Accelerated payment of PSUs replacement grant
• Accelerated vesting of RSUs
• Prorated annual cash bonus(1)
Total
9,203,645
—
15,732,061
2,291,203
—
5,136,607
2,516,407
—
1,877,625
1,463,936
—
204,967
5,472,239 3,972,330 4,143,701
6,500,000
2,816,988
2,927,416
2,275,011
2,237,660
28,416
12,525,134
9,203,645
9,579,615
—
3,900,000
28,416
2,663,567
1,877,625
1,934,371
—
529,972
41,736,810 12,174,582 13,114,163 9,040,564 9,271,611
28,416
2,072,974
1,463,936
1,493,199
732,023
975,005
28,416
3,573,130
2,516,407
2,605,086
—
1,463,708
28,416
3,254,160
2,291,203
2,375,321
—
1,408,494
(1) Pursuant to the Severance Protection Plan, Ms. Hemmer receives a prorated target annual cash bonus under this
scenario. Mr. Fish, Ms. Rankin, Mr. Morris and Mr. Boettcher receive a prorated maximum annual cash bonus under
this scenario pursuant to their 2017 Employment Agreements. The 2017 Employment Agreements provided for this
enhanced treatment partially on account of similar terms in pre-existing employment agreements that executives
were agreeing to terminate in order to support the Company’s transition toward a more standardized and flexible
approach to severance protections.
2022 Proxy Statement | 47
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio
In 2022, we reconducted our analysis to identify the Company’s median employee, based on total annual compensation
for all employees other than our Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with SEC Regulation S-K, Item 402(u) (the “Median
Employee”). To select the Median Employee, we determined the actual taxable compensation paid to each listed employee
in 2021, converted to U.S. dollars at appropriate exchange rates for non-U.S. employees, and annualized for salaried
employees hired during the year. We did not apply any cost-of-living adjustments nor did we use any form of statistical
sampling. The Median Employee, a Senior Technician in the U.S., was identified from a list of Company employees as of
December 31, 2021. Out of a total worldwide employee population of 48,687 on that date, the list included 47,617
employees and excluded the Chief Executive Officer and our 1,069 employees based in India. Approximately 95.7% of
these total employees work in the U.S. and approximately 4.3% work in Canada. Over 99% of these individuals are full-
time employees. Any temporary or seasonal employees are included; any subcontracted workers are not employees and
are excluded. For 2021, total annual compensation for the Median Employee was $80,744. The annual compensation of
our Chief Executive Officer was $13,057,363, for a ratio of 1:162. These values were calculated in accordance with SEC
Regulation S-K, Item 402(c)(2)(x) requirements for reporting total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.
Equity Compensation Plan Table
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2021 about the number of shares to be issued upon vesting
or exercise of equity awards and shares remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise
of Outstanding
Options and Rights
4,717,856(2)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options and Rights
$92.53(3)
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
19,587,918(4)
(1)
(2)
Includes our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, 2014 Stock Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). No
additional awards may be granted under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
Includes: options outstanding for 3,206,076 shares of Common Stock; 201,098 shares of Common Stock to be issued
in connection with deferred compensation obligations; 342,860 shares underlying unvested RSUs and 967,822
shares of Common Stock that would be issued on account of outstanding PSUs if the target performance level is
achieved. Assuming, instead, that the maximum performance level was achieved on such PSUs, the amount of
Common Stock that would be issued on account of outstanding awards would increase by 967,822 shares.
The total number of shares subject to outstanding awards in the table above includes 346,402 shares on account of
PSUs, at target, with the performance period ended December 31, 2021. The determination of achievement of
performance results on such PSUs was performed by the MD&C Committee in February 2022, and the Company
achieved (a) maximum performance criteria on the Cash Flow PSUs, yielding a 200% payout and (b) above target
performance criteria on the TSR PSUs, yielding a 167.78% payout. A total of 420,888 shares of Common Stock were
issued on account of such PSUs in February 2022, net of units deferred, of which 228,582 shares of Common Stock
were included in the first column of the table above.
Excludes purchase rights that accrue under the ESPP. Purchase rights under the ESPP are considered equity
compensation for accounting purposes; however, the number of shares to be purchased is indeterminable until the
time shares are actually issued, as automatic employee contributions may be terminated before the end of an
offering period and, due to the look-back pricing feature, the purchase price and corresponding number of shares to
be purchased is unknown.
(3) Excludes PSUs and RSUs because those awards do not have exercise prices associated with them. Also excludes
purchase rights under the ESPP for the reasons described in note (2) above.
(4) The shares remaining available include 2,724,119 shares under our ESPP and 16,863,799 shares under our 2014
Stock Incentive Plan, assuming payout of PSUs at maximum. Assuming payout of PSUs at target, the number of
shares remaining available for issuance under our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan would be 17,831,621.
48 |
2022 Proxy Statement
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
(ITEM 2 ON THE PROXY CARD)
Our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, has ratified the selection of Ernst & Young LLP
to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022, subject to ratification by our
stockholders. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the virtual Annual Meeting. They will be able to make a
statement if they want, and will be available to answer appropriate questions submitted by stockholders during the
virtual Annual Meeting.
Although ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by our By-laws or otherwise, we are submitting
the selection to stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered
public accounting firm and as a matter of good governance. If our stockholders do not ratify our selection, it will be
considered a direction to our Board and Audit Committee to consider selecting another firm. Even if the selection is
ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm,
subject to ratification by the Board, at any time during the year if it determines that such a change is in the best interests
of the Company and our stockholders.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEE INFORMATION
Fees for professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in each of the last two
fiscal years, in each of the following categories, were as follows:
Audit Fees
Audit-Related Fees
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
Total
2021
2020
(In millions)
$6.2
—
—
—
$6.2
$5.9
0.3
—
—
$6.2
Audit fees include fees for the annual audit, reviews of the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, work performed
to support the Company’s debt issuances, accounting consultations, and separate subsidiary audits required by statute
or regulation. Audit-related fees also include services relating to the implementation of the Company’s new enterprise
resource planning system.
The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the approval of Ernst & Young LLP’s services and related fees. At the
beginning of each year, all audit and audit-related services, tax fees and other fees for the upcoming audit are provided
to the Audit Committee for approval. The services are grouped into significant categories and provided to the Audit
Committee in the format shown above. All projects that have the potential to exceed $100,000 are separately identified
and reported to the Committee for approval. The Audit Committee Chairman has the authority to approve additional
services, not previously approved, between Committee meetings. Any additional services approved by the Audit
Committee Chairman between Committee meetings are reported to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly
scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee is updated on the status of all services and related fees at every regular meeting.
In 2021 and 2020, the Audit Committee or Audit Committee Chairman pre-approved all audit and audit-related services
performed by Ernst & Young LLP. As set forth in the Audit Committee Report, the Audit Committee has considered
whether the provision of these audit-related services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence and has
determined that it is.
VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote.
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE
RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022.
2022 Proxy Statement | 49
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(ITEM 3 ON THE PROXY CARD)
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are entitled to an advisory (non-binding) vote on compensation
programs for our named executive officers (sometimes referred to as “say on pay”). The Board of Directors has
determined that it will include this “say on pay” vote in the Company’s proxy materials annually, pending consideration of
future advisory stockholder votes on the frequency of this advisory vote on executive compensation.
We encourage stockholders to review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Executive Compensation Tables
on pages 23 to 48 of this Proxy Statement. The Company has designed its executive compensation program to be
supportive of, and align with, the strategy of the Company and the creation of stockholder value, while discouraging
excessive risk-taking. The following key structural elements and policies, discussed in more detail in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, further the objective of our executive compensation program and evidence our dedication to
competitive and reasonable compensation practices that are in the best interests of stockholders:
• a significant majority of our named executive’s target compensation is linked to Company performance and
long-term equity awards, which aligns executives’ interests with those of stockholders;
• our total direct compensation opportunities for named executive officers are targeted to fall in a range around the
competitive median;
• performance-based awards include threshold, target and maximum payouts correlating to a range of
performance outcomes and are based on a variety of indicators of performance, which limits risk-taking behavior;
• performance stock units with a three-year performance period, as well as stock options that vest over a three-
interests with long-term performance and reduce incentives to maximize
year period,
link executives’
performance in any one year;
• all of our executive officers are subject to stock ownership guidelines, which we believe demonstrates a
commitment to, and confidence in, the Company’s long-term prospects;
• the Company has clawback provisions in its equity award agreements and executive officer employment
agreements, and has adopted a clawback policy applicable to annual incentive compensation, designed to recoup
compensation when cause and/or misconduct are found; and
• the Company has adopted policies that limit executive officer severance benefits and prohibit it from entering into
agreements with executive officers that provide for certain death benefits or tax gross-up payments.
The Board strongly endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and recommends that the stockholders
vote in favor of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement
under “Executive Compensation,” including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular and narrative
disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement, is hereby APPROVED.
VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote. Because the vote is advisory, it will
not be binding, and neither the Board nor the MD&C Committee will be required to take any action as a result of the
outcome of the vote on this proposal. The MD&C Committee will carefully consider the outcome of the vote in connection
with future executive compensation arrangements.
FOR THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPANY’S
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
50 |
2022 Proxy Statement
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
(ITEM 4 ON THE PROXY CARD)
The following proposal was submitted by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund, 25 Louisiana Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20001, which owns 143 shares of Waste Management, Inc. Common Stock. The proposal has been
included verbatim as we received it. Waste Management is not responsible for the content of this stockholder proposal
or supporting statement.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
RESOLVED that shareholders of Waste Management, Inc. (“Waste Management”), urge the Board of Directors to oversee
a third-party audit analyzing the adverse impact of Waste Management’s policies and practices on the civil rights of
company stakeholders, above and beyond legal and regulatory matters, and to provide recommendations for improving
the company’s civil rights impact. Input from civil rights organizations, employees, customers, and other stakeholders
should be considered in determining the specific matters to be analyzed. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable
cost and omitting confidential or proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on Waste Management’s website.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT:
Recently, the racial justice movement together with the disproportionate impacts of the COVID- 19 pandemic have focused
the public’s and policy makers’ attention on civil rights and gender and racial equity issues. In response to the racial
justice protests in June 2020, Waste Management’s CEO stated that “Waste Management’s family stand united against
racism.” Inclusion, equity, and diversity (IE&D) is also a fundamental value and part of the company’s code of conduct.
While the company states IE&D is a fundamental value, its policies and practices fail to reflect this statement. Waste
Management’s workforce is 22% Hispanic, 19% Black, and 18% women according to its latest diversity report (2020
data). Yet only 11% of executives are considered ethnically diverse. Further, based on 2019 data (the latest year for which
Waste Management broke out the category), nearly half of the jobs held by women are in “administrative support,” while
79% of executive and management level positions are held by men. Though the company has a goal of increasing
representation of women overall and minorities in all segments of the business by 2025, it is unclear how Waste
Management is evaluating the effectiveness of these programs given there does not appear to be concrete metrics
attached.
Lending urgency to an audit is the recent suggestion by company management that immigrants are good candidates for
alleviating the industry’s perceived driver shortage.1 Targeting immigrants to fill high-paying, stable jobs could help
ameliorate inequalities. However, immigrants, especially those of color, are among the most vulnerable and easily
exploitable populations. A PBS NewsHour report noted, “Immigrants perform some of America’s lowest-paying, arduous
jobs, and are among those most victimized by employers failing to pay them fairly.”2
The civil rights impact of Waste Management’s facilities and services also warrant further evaluation. The company
disclosed that the majority of people living within one kilometer of its facilities are non-white. While the company is
providing greater transparency on its environmental justice footprint, it does not appear to have objectively evaluated
how this data could be used to address the disproportionate impact of its facilities on the public health and economic
equality of communities of color.
We urge shareholders to vote FOR this proposal.
1 https://www.wastedive.com/news/waste-expo-labor-shortage-incarcerated-worker-opportunities/602638/
2 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/wage-theft-hits-immigrants-hard
WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSE TO STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
The Board recommends that stockholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
Waste Management appreciates the proponent’s investment in our Company and the direct engagement with the
proponent via video calls and emails in response to their stockholder proposal. We respect the request for a civil rights
audit and understand the critical importance of racial and gender equity and environmental justice. Inclusion, equity &
2022 Proxy Statement | 51
diversity are fundamental values at Waste Management, and we are committed to our work in these areas. We encourage
stockholders to review our 2021 Sustainability Report at https://sustainability.wm.com to learn more about our people-
first culture and progress embedding inclusion, equity and diversity across our Company. (Neither our 2021 Sustainability
Report, nor any information available at https://sustainability.wm.com, constitutes a part of, or is incorporated by
reference into, this Proxy Statement or any report filed with the SEC.)
We are proud of the work done so far, and we know that future progress will require on-going efforts, long-term focus
and dedication. In particular, Waste Management has two substantial initiatives currently in-progress that we expect to
yield notable results to be publicly-disclosed in 2022; those initiatives include:
• In 2021, our Company engaged the consulting services arm of one of the big four accounting firms to conduct a
substantial assessment of Waste Management’s ESG goals and progress against them and assist in setting new
goals. This effort includes review of our Company’s prior and current practices, goals and materiality
assessments; benchmarking against competitors and leaders; review of customer and investor expectations;
consideration of opportunities, risks, barriers and future developments; development of a ESG goal-setting
framework and new ESG goals (including a Science-Based Target for greenhouse gas emissions, as well as
social/ workforce goals); preparation of a roadmap for each goal, including programs/policies, communication
strategies and delivery costs; and documentation of a process to analyze results. Waste Management’s new ESG
goals resulting from this process will be announced in 2022.
• Waste Management has long been focused on environmental justice and the relationship between our facilities
and their communities. In 2021, we undertook efforts to further this understanding with the development of a new
environmental justice mapping tool in response to specific investor inquiries to be able to see all Waste
Management facilities on a map, linking to the EPA’s publicly available EJ mapping tool. The results of these
efforts are being updated in our ESG Hub on our sustainability website as they are completed. After doing the
extensive data gathering and input necessary in 2021 to develop the new EJ mapping tool, we are evaluating
additional ways the tool might be used to provide information regarding Waste Management’s footprint and
community impact.
The completion of these two projects in 2022, as well as other on-going activities discussed in our Sustainability Report,
will provide substantial advancement, and a more clear and measurable understanding, of our Company’s social and
environmental justice commitments. For this reason, we believe the best course of action for 2022 is to continue our
work-in-progress to which our people and resources are already dedicated, and to allow this work to inform our next
steps. We believe that undertaking a civil rights audit in 2022 could disrupt, delay and divert attention and important
resources from the goal-setting work that is already underway, as well as hinder the execution of the audit. Additionally,
with racial equity audits and civil rights audits being relatively new initiatives, we also believe that it would be beneficial
to our future consideration of such an undertaking to allow additional companies, and auditors, to gain experience about
the best methodology, process and scope for such an audit. Accordingly, our Board recommends a vote against this
stockholder proposal.
Additionally, through the course of direct engagement with the proponent, we gathered internal ESG leaders to discuss
other specific inquiries raised. In response to a particular follow-up inquiry from the proponent about the use of prison-
labor, we were pleased to report, and update our internal policies to reflect, that Waste Management does not use forced
labor or prison-labor in the performance of any work.
VOTE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
If this proposal is properly presented at the meeting, approval requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock present at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote.
AGAINST
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.
OTHER MATTERS
The Company does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting, nor does the Company have any
present knowledge that any other matters will be presented by others for action at the meeting. If any other matters are
properly presented, your proxy card authorizes the people named as proxy holders to vote using their judgment.
52 |
2022 Proxy Statement
Form 10-K
s
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-12154
Waste Management, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
800 Capitol Street
Suite 3000
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
73-1309529
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
77002
(Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(713) 512-6200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol
WM
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial
reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2021 was approximately $58.9 billion. The aggregate market value
was computed by using the closing price of the common stock as of that date on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). (For purposes of calculating this amount only, all
directors and executive officers of the registrant have been treated as affiliates.)
The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, of the registrant outstanding as of February 9, 2022 was 414,586,718 (excluding treasury shares of 215,695,743).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document
Proxy Statement for the
2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Incorporated as to
Part III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[Reserved] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters .
Item 12.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 14.
PART IV
Exhibits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 15.
Item 16.
Page
3
17
31
31
32
32
32
34
34
66
67
127
127
128
128
128
128
128
128
129
131
2
Item 1. Business.
General
PART I
Waste Management, Inc. is a holding company and all operations are conducted by its subsidiaries. When the terms
“the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” are used in this document, those terms refer to Waste Management, Inc., its
consolidated subsidiaries and consolidated variable interest entities. When we use the term “WMI,” we are referring only
to Waste Management, Inc., the parent holding company.
WMI was incorporated in Oklahoma in 1987 under the name “USA Waste Services, Inc.” and was reincorporated as
a Delaware company in 1995. In a 1998 merger, the Illinois-based waste services company formerly known as Waste
Management, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of WMI and changed its name to Waste Management Holdings, Inc.
(“WM Holdings”). At the same time, our parent holding company changed its name from USA Waste Services to Waste
Management, Inc. Like WMI, WM Holdings is a holding company and all operations are conducted by subsidiaries.
Our principal executive offices are located at 800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas 77002. Our telephone
number is (713) 512 - 6200. Our website address is www.wm.com. Our annual reports on Form 10 - K, quarterly reports on
Form 10 - Q and current reports on Form 8 - K are all available, free of charge, on our website as soon as practicable after
we file the reports with the SEC. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WM.”
We are North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, providing
services throughout the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. We partner with our residential, commercial, industrial and
municipal customers and the communities we serve to manage and reduce waste at each stage from collection to disposal,
while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. Our “Solid Waste” business is operated and
managed locally by our subsidiaries that focus on distinct geographic areas and provide collection, transfer, disposal, and
recycling and resource recovery services. Through our subsidiaries, we are also a leading developer, operator and owner
of landfill gas-to-energy facilities in the U.S. During 2021, our largest customer represented less than 5% of annual
revenues. We employed approximately 48,500 people as of December 31, 2021.
We own or operate 260 landfill sites, which is the largest network of landfills throughout the U.S. and Canada. In
order to make disposal more practical for larger urban markets, where the distance to landfills is typically farther, we
manage 340 transfer stations that consolidate, compact and transport waste efficiently and economically. We also use
waste to create energy, recovering the gas produced naturally as waste decomposes in landfills and using the gas in
generators to make electricity. We are a leading recycler in the U.S. and Canada, handling materials that include cardboard,
paper, glass, plastic and metal. We provide cost-efficient, environmentally sound recycling programs for municipalities,
businesses and households across the U.S. and Canada as well as other services that supplement our Solid Waste business.
Our Company’s goals are targeted at putting our people first, positioning them to serve and care for our customers,
the environment, the communities in which we work and our stockholders. Increasingly, our industry-leading focus on
environmental sustainability aligns with demand from our customers who want more of their waste materials recovered.
Waste streams are becoming more complex, and our aim is to address current needs, while anticipating the expanding and
evolving needs of our customers.
We believe we are uniquely equipped to meet the challenges of the changing waste industry and our customers’ waste
management needs, both today and as we work together to envision and create a more sustainable future. As the waste
industry leader, we have the expertise necessary to collect and handle our customers’ waste efficiently and responsibly by
delivering environmental performance — maximizing resource value, while minimizing environmental impact — so that
both our economy and our environment can thrive.
Our fundamental strategy has not changed; we remain dedicated to providing long-term value to our stockholders by
successfully executing our core strategy of focused differentiation and continuous improvement. As North America’s
3
leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, sustainability and environmental
stewardship is embedded in all that we do. We have enabled a people-first, technology-led focus to drive our mission, that
we are always working for a sustainable tomorrow. Our strategy leverages and sustains the strongest asset network in the
industry to drive best in class customer experience and growth. Our strategic planning processes appropriately consider
that the future of our business and the industry can be influenced by changes in economic conditions, the competitive
landscape, the regulatory environment, asset and resource availability and technology. We believe that focused
differentiation, which is driven by capitalizing on our unique and extensive network of assets, will deliver profitable growth
and position us to leverage competitive advantages. Simultaneously, we believe the combination of cost control,
enhancements to our digital platform, process improvement and operational efficiency will deliver on the Company’s
strategy of continuous improvement and yield an attractive total cost structure and enhanced service quality. While we
continue to improve existing diversion technologies, such as through investments in our recycling operations, we are also
evaluating and pursuing emerging diversion technologies that may generate additional value.
We believe that execution of our strategy will deliver shareholder value and leadership in a dynamic industry and
challenging economic environment. In addition, we intend to continue to return value to our stockholders through dividend
payments and our common stock repurchase program. In December 2021, we announced that our Board of Directors
expects to increase the quarterly dividend from $0.575 to $0.65 per share for dividends declared in 2022, which is a 13.0%
increase from the quarterly dividends we declared in 2021. This is an indication of our ability to generate strong and
consistent cash flows and marks the 19th consecutive year of dividend increases. All quarterly dividends will be declared
at the discretion of our Board of Directors and depend on various factors, including our net earnings, financial condition,
cash required for future business plans, growth and acquisitions and other factors the Board of Directors may deem
relevant.
Operations
General
In 2021, our senior management began evaluating, overseeing and managing the financial performance of our Solid
Waste operations through two operating segments. Our East Tier primarily consists of geographic areas located in the
Eastern U.S., the Great Lakes region and substantially all of Canada. Our West Tier primarily includes geographic areas
located in the Western U.S., including the upper Midwest region, and British Columbia, Canada. Each of our Solid Waste
operating segments provides integrated environmental services, including collection, transfer, recycling, and disposal. The
Company finalized the assessment of our segments during the fourth quarter of 2021. The East and West Tiers are
presented in this report and constitute our existing Solid Waste business. On October 30, 2020, we acquired Advanced
Disposal Services, Inc. (“Advanced Disposal”), the operations of which are presented in this report within our existing
Solid Waste tiers. Additional information related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and segments is included in
Notes 17 and 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively. We also provide expanded service offerings and
solutions that are not managed through our Solid Waste business, as described below. These operations are presented in
this report as “Other.” The services we provide are described below.
Collection. Our commitment to customers begins with a vast waste collection network. Collection involves picking
up and transporting waste and recyclable materials from where it was generated to a transfer station, material recovery
facility (“MRF”) or disposal site. We generally provide collection services under one of two types of arrangements:
For commercial and industrial collection services, typically we have three-year service agreements. The fees
under the agreements are influenced by factors such as collection frequency, type of collection equipment we
furnish, type and volume or weight of the waste collected, distance to the disposal facility, labor costs, cost of
disposal and general market factors. As part of the service, we provide steel containers to most customers to store
their solid waste between pick-up dates. Containers vary in size and type according to the needs of our customers
and the restrictions of their communities. Many are designed to be lifted mechanically and either emptied into a
truck’s compaction hopper or directly into a disposal site. By using these containers, we can service most of our
commercial and industrial customers with trucks operated by only one employee.
4
For most residential collection services, we have a contract with, or a franchise granted by, a municipality,
homeowners’ association or some other regional authority that gives us the exclusive right to service all or a
portion of the homes in an area. These contracts or franchises are typically for periods of three to ten years. We
also provide services under individual monthly subscriptions directly to households. The fees for residential
collection are either paid by the municipality or authority from their tax revenues or service charges, or are paid
directly by the residents receiving the service. The Company is generally phasing out traditional manual systems
and moving to further automate residential collection services. Benefits of automation include enhanced worker
safety, improved service delivery to the customer and an overall reduction in the cost to provide services.
Landfill. Landfills are the main depositories for solid waste in North America. As of December 31, 2021, we owned
or operated 255 solid waste landfills and five secure hazardous waste landfills, which represents the largest network of
landfills throughout the U.S. and Canada. Solid waste landfills are constructed and operated on land with engineering
safeguards that limit the possibility of water and air pollution, and are operated under procedures prescribed by regulation.
A landfill must meet federal, state or provincial, and local regulations during its design, construction, operation and closure.
The operation and closure activities of a solid waste landfill include excavation, construction of liners, continuous
spreading and compacting of waste, covering of waste with earth or other acceptable material and constructing final
capping of the landfill. These operations are carefully planned to maintain environmentally safe conditions and to
maximize the use of the airspace.
All solid waste management companies must have access to a disposal facility, such as a solid waste landfill. The
significant capital requirements of developing and operating a landfill serve as a barrier to landfill ownership and, thus,
third-party haulers often dispose of waste at our landfills. It is usually preferable for our collection operations to use
disposal facilities that we own or operate, a practice we refer to as internalization, rather than using third-party disposal
facilities. Internalization generally allows us to realize higher consolidated margins and stronger operating cash flows. The
fees charged at disposal facilities, which are referred to as tipping fees, are based on several factors, including our cost to
construct, maintain and close the landfill, the distance to an alternative disposal facility, the type and weight or volume of
solid waste deposited and competition.
Under environmental laws, the federal government (or states with delegated authority) must issue permits for all
hazardous waste landfills. All of our hazardous waste landfills have obtained the required permits, although some can
accept only certain types of hazardous waste. These landfills must also comply with specialized operating standards. Only
hazardous waste in a stable, solid form, which meets regulatory requirements, can be deposited in our secure disposal cells.
In some cases, hazardous waste can be treated before disposal. Generally, these treatments involve the separation or
removal of solid materials from liquids and chemical treatments that transform waste into inert materials that are no longer
hazardous. Our hazardous waste landfills are sited, constructed and operated in a manner designed to provide long-term
containment of waste. We also operate a hazardous waste facility at which we isolate treated hazardous waste in liquid
form by injection into deep wells that have been drilled in certain acceptable geologic formations far below the base of
fresh water to a point that is safely separated by other substantial geological confining layers.
Transfer. As of December 31, 2021, we owned or operated 340 transfer stations in the U.S. and Canada. We deposit
waste at these stations, as do other waste haulers. The solid waste is then consolidated and compacted to reduce the volume
and increase the density of the waste and transported by transfer trucks or by rail to disposal sites.
Access to transfer stations is critical to haulers who collect waste in areas not in close proximity to disposal facilities.
Fees charged to third parties at transfer stations are usually based on the type and volume or weight of the waste deposited
at the transfer station, the distance to the disposal site, market rates for disposal costs and other general market factors.
The utilization of our transfer stations by our own collection operations improves internalization by allowing us to
retain fees that we would otherwise pay to third parties for the disposal of the waste we collect. It enables us to manage
costs associated with waste disposal because (i) transfer trucks, railcars or rail containers have larger capacities than
collection trucks, allowing us to deliver more waste to the disposal facility in each trip; (ii) waste is accumulated and
compacted at transfer stations that are strategically located to increase the efficiency of our network of operations and
(iii) we can retain the volume by managing the transfer of the waste to one of our own disposal sites.
5
The transfer stations that we operate but do not own generally are operated through lease agreements under which we
lease property from third parties. There are some instances where transfer stations are operated under contract, generally
for municipalities. In most cases, we own the permits and will be responsible for any regulatory requirements relating to
the operation and closure of the transfer station.
Recycling. Our recycling operations provide communities and businesses with an alternative to traditional landfill
disposal and support our strategic goals to extract more value from the materials we manage. We were the first major solid
waste company to focus on residential single-stream recycling, which allows customers to mix clean bottles, cans, paper
and cardboard in one bin. Residential single-stream programs have greatly increased the recycling volumes. Single-stream
recycling is possible through the use of various mechanized screens and optical sorting technologies. In 2021, we made
significant investments in technology to automate our equipment, which benefits our labor productivity, produce higher
quality commodities for our customers, and increase our capacity in geographies where we currently have a MRF, as well
as expanding our footprint into new geographies. In addition to advancing our single stream recycling programs for
commercial applications, we will continue to invest in recycling technologies designed to offer services and solutions to
support and grow our current operations. Recycling involves the separation of reusable materials from the waste stream
for processing and resale or other disposition. Our recycling operations include the following:
Materials processing — Through our collection operations and third-party customer base, we collect recyclable
materials from residential, commercial and industrial customers and direct these materials to one of our MRFs for
processing. As of December 31, 2021, we operated 96 MRFs, of which 49 are single stream, where cardboard, paper,
glass, metals, plastics, construction and demolition materials and other recycling commodities are recovered for resale
or redirected for other purposes.
Recycling commodities — We market and resell recycling commodities globally. We manage the marketing of
recycling commodities that are processed in our facilities by maintaining comprehensive service centers that
continuously analyze market prices, logistics, market demands and product quality.
Recycling brokerage services — We also provide recycling brokerage services, which involve managing the
marketing of recyclable materials for third parties. The experience of our recycling operations in managing recycling
commodities for our own operations gives us the expertise needed to effectively manage volumes for third parties.
Utilizing the resources and knowledge of our recycling operations’ service centers, we can assist customers in
marketing and selling their recycling commodities with minimal capital requirements.
The recyclable materials processed in our MRFs are received from various sources, including third parties and our
own operations. In recent years, we have been focused on reducing dependency on market prices for recycled commodities
by recovering our processing costs first. In our materials processing business, we have been transitioning our customer
base over time from the traditional rebate model, where we paid suppliers for the inbound material, to a fee-for-service
model that ensures the cost of processing the recyclable materials is covered along with an acceptable margin. With our
current fee-for-service model, the pricing for these recyclable materials can either be a charge or “tip fee” when commodity
pricing does not cover our cost to process the recyclable materials or a “rebate” when commodity pricing is higher than
our processing costs and we are able to share this benefit with the customers generating recyclable materials. In some
cases, our pricing is based on fixed contractual rates or on defined minimum per-ton rates. Generally, this pricing also
considers the price we receive for sales of processed goods, market conditions and transportation costs. As a result, changes
in commodity prices for recycled materials also significantly affect the pricing to our suppliers. Depending on the key
terms of the arrangement, these “rebates” are recorded as either operating expenses or a reduction in operating revenues
within our Consolidated Statements of Operations. If the key terms result in a charge to the customer, the associated “tip
fees” would be recorded as operating revenues within our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Other. Other services we provide include the following:
Although many waste management services such as collection and disposal are local services, our Strategic Business
Solutions (“WMSBS”) business works with customers whose locations span the U.S. and Canada. Our strategic accounts
6
program provides centralized customer service, billing and management of accounts to streamline the administration of
customers’ waste management needs across multiple locations.
Our Energy and Environmental Services (“EES”) business offers our customers a variety of services in collaboration
with our Area and strategic accounts programs, including (i) construction and remediation services; (ii) services associated
with the disposal of fly ash, which is residue generated from the combustion of coal, and other fuel stocks; (iii) in-plant
services, where our employees work full-time inside our customers’ facilities to provide full-service waste management
solutions and consulting services (this service is managed through our EES business but reflected principally in our
collection line of business) and (iv) specialized disposal services for oil and gas exploration and production operations
(revenues for this service are also reflected principally in our collection line of business). Our vertically integrated waste
management operations enable us to provide customers with full management of their waste. The breadth of our service
offerings and the familiarity we have with waste management practices gives us the unique ability to assist customers in
minimizing the amount of waste they generate, identifying recycling opportunities, determining the most efficient means
available for waste collection and disposal and ensuring that disposal is achieved in a manner that is both reflective of the
current regulatory environment and environmentally friendly.
We develop, operate and promote projects for the beneficial use of landfill gas through our WM Renewable Energy
business. Landfill gas is produced naturally as waste decomposes in a landfill. The methane component of the landfill gas
is a readily available, renewable energy source that can be gathered and used beneficially as an alternative to fossil fuel.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) endorses landfill gas as a renewable energy resource, in the same
category as wind, solar and geothermal resources. As of December 31, 2021, we had 144 landfill gas beneficial use projects
producing commercial quantities of methane gas at owned or operated landfills. For 102 of these projects, the processed
gas is used to fuel electricity generators. The electricity is then sold to public utilities, municipal utilities or power
cooperatives. For 16 of these projects, the landfill gas is processed to pipeline-quality natural gas and then sold to natural
gas suppliers. For 26 of these projects, the gas is used at the landfill or delivered by pipeline to industrial customers as a
direct substitute for fossil fuels in industrial processes.
WM Renewable Energy also produces renewable natural gas (“RNG”) from landfill gas and generates renewable
identification numbers (“RINs”) under the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) program and other credits under a variety
of state programs associated with the use of RNG in our compressed natural gas fleet. The RINs and credits are sold to
counterparties who are obligated under the regulatory programs and have a responsibility to procure RINs and credits
proportionate to their fossil fuel production and imports. RINs prices generally respond to regulations enacted by the EPA
or other regulatory bodies, as well as fluctuations in supply and demand. WM Renewable Energy currently has four owned
facilities producing 3.2 million MMBtu of RNG annually and most of the revenue from these facilities is generated through
the sale of RINs. We expect to grow the number of plants from four to 21 by 2026 and project that we will generate
approximately 24 million MMBtu of RNG annually with the expanded asset base. While developing these facilities and
expanding our renewable energy generation, we intend to evaluate various offtake arrangements, including the sale of
RINs and the direct sale of RNG to large industrial users such as utilities and colleges and universities.
We provide expanded service offerings and solutions that are not managed through our Solid Waste business including
the collection of project waste, including construction debris and household or yard waste, through our Bagster® business.
We continue to invest in businesses and technologies that are designed to offer services and solutions ancillary or
supplementary to our current operations. While most of these investments are in the form of minority equity stakes, they
can also include joint ventures, joint development agreements or majority equity stakes. The solutions and services include
(i) waste collection, processing, and recycling; (ii) the development, operation and marketing of waste processing facilities
and technologies; (iii) operation of renewable natural gas plants and (iv) the development and operation of organic
recycling technologies. Furthermore, we continually scout, evaluate and run proof-of-concepts of innovative technologies
within our core operations to improve safety, operational efficiencies and customer solutions.
7
Competition
We encounter intense competition from governmental, quasi - governmental and private sources in all aspects of our
operations. We principally compete with large national waste management companies, counties and municipalities that
maintain their own waste collection and disposal operations and regional and local companies of varying sizes and financial
resources. The industry also includes companies that specialize in certain discrete areas of waste management, operators
of alternative disposal facilities, companies that seek to use parts of the waste stream as feedstock for renewable energy
and other by-products, and waste brokers that rely upon haulers in local markets to address customer needs.
Operating costs, disposal costs and collection fees vary widely throughout the geographic areas in which we operate.
The prices that we charge are determined locally, and typically vary by volume and weight, type of waste collected,
treatment requirements, risk of handling or disposal, frequency of collections, distance to final disposal sites, the
availability of airspace within the geographic region, labor costs and amount and type of equipment furnished to the
customer. We face intense competition in our Solid Waste business based on pricing and quality of service. We also
compete for business based on breadth of service offerings. As companies, individuals and communities look for ways to
be more sustainable, we are promoting our comprehensive services that go beyond our core business of collecting and
disposing of waste in order to meet their needs.
Seasonal Trends
Our operating revenues tend to be somewhat higher in summer months, primarily due to higher construction and
demolition waste volumes. The volumes of industrial and residential waste in certain regions where we operate also tend
to increase during the summer months. Our second and third quarter revenues and results of operations typically reflect
these seasonal trends.
Service disruptions caused by severe storms, extended periods of inclement weather or climate events can significantly
affect the operating results of the geographic areas affected. On the other hand, certain destructive weather and climate
conditions, such as wildfires in the Western U.S. and hurricanes that most often impact our operations in the Southern and
Eastern U.S. during the second half of the year, can increase our revenues in the geographic areas affected as a result of
the waste volumes generated by these events. While weather-related and other event-driven special projects can boost
revenues through additional work for a limited time, due to significant start-up costs and other factors, such revenue can
generate earnings at comparatively lower margins.
Human Capital Resources
Employees
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately 48,500 full-time employees across the U.S., Canada and India.
Approximately 45,400 employees were located within the U.S. and 3,100 employees were located outside of the U.S.
Approximately 9,200 employees were employed in administrative and sales positions with the remainder in operations.
Approximately 8,500 of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Additional information about
our workforce can be found in our 2021 Sustainability Report at https://sustainability.wm.com. Our 2021 Sustainability
Report does not constitute a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this report or any other report we file with
(or furnish to) the SEC, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
People First Commitment
Our Company is committed to People First, knowing that the daily contributions of our team members are what enable
us to play a vital role in the communities we serve. Our success depends upon effective leadership, the contributions of
each employee, and our ability to give them the tools they need to safely execute their roles as well as to develop and excel
in their careers. As our industry and workforce evolve, we are focused on our imperatives of keeping our employees safe,
improving diversity, equity, and inclusion at all levels of our Company, managing employee turnover and increasing
8
retention and supporting ongoing cultural integration and knowledge transfer. We regularly focus on these objectives when
managing our business.
We strive to be a workplace of choice through competitive pay, comprehensive benefits for long-term financial and
personal health and opportunities for growth across our ranks. "We Are WM" is our Employer Value Proposition, grounded
in our People First commitment and shared through a framework that enables us to display that we are (i) investing in our
teams by providing comprehensive benefits; (ii) committed to the growth of our team by providing state-of-the-art
trainings and our new education benefit, Your Tomorrow, as further discussed under Compensation and Benefits;
(iii) performing essential and meaningful work and (iv) working for a sustainable tomorrow by leaving the world a better
place than we found it. Being an employer of choice is critical to our efforts to attract and retain a high-quality workforce,
while motivating us to sharpen our focus on our values that help us empower and develop good employees. By promoting
from within and offering training opportunities, we help employees maximize their effectiveness and grow in their careers.
Safety as a Core Value
At the Company, safety is a core value, with no compromise. A large number of our employee population work as
drivers, heavy equipment operators and sorters, which are essential jobs that carry inherent risks. For nearly 20 years, we
have engaged employees on safety through our Mission to Zero (“M2Z”) program. The “Zero” in M2Z represents zero
tolerance for unsafe behaviors. Employees learn safety best practices through new-hire and ongoing training. To build
upon lessons learned in training, we conduct structured observations of frontline employees that cover all aspects of our
collection and post-collection operations, including driving, loading, unloading, lifting and lowering and arriving prepared
for work.
Learning and Development
We offer expansive learning and development solutions to meet the development needs of our people and supporting
opportunities for growth and improvement. Our talent management strategy is designed to reach employees at all levels.
Given the wide variety of employee roles and skill sets in our Company, our training and development programs are varied
but generally fall into the following categories: (i) compliance, including Code of Conduct and cybersecurity training;
(ii) safety; (iii) environmental excellence; (iv) professional development and leadership and (v) job-specific.
Inclusion, Equity and Diversity
We embrace and cultivate respect, trust, open communications and diversity of thought and people. We are committed
to equality for all, and foster an environment where all teammates feel welcomed, valued and seen. We are laser-focused
on strengthening our current business strategy to see that inclusion, equity and diversity (“IE&D”) are not an initiative,
but core in everything that we do. Our commitment to IE&D starts at the top with our senior leadership team being
comprised of 30% ethnic minorities and 30% women as of December 31, 2021; and with our overall workforce in the U.S.
being comprised of approximately 45% ethnic minorities and approximately 19% women as of the same date. We are
proud of what we have been able to achieve. To enable us to achieve our goals, we have established a cross-functional
IE&D Council aimed at evaluating policies, practices and procedures, recruitment and partnerships to ensure that our
IE&D efforts are sustainable and are tied to our business strategy.
Compensation and Benefits
The objective of our compensation and benefit programs is to attract, engage, reward and incentivize valuable
employees who will support the successful execution of our strategy. We pay the full cost to provide employees with
short - term disability benefits, long-term disability benefits, basic life insurance for the employee and their dependents,
and employee and family assistance benefits. The costs for medical and dental coverage are shared with employees, with
the Company paying for a majority of the premium expense. The Company offers other important benefits such as paid
vacation and holidays, legal services, flexible spending accounts, dependent care assistance, adoption assistance, employee
discounts and student loan refinancing services. We also recognize the value of learning beyond the workplace. In 2021,
we announced a new education benefit, Your Tomorrow. Your Tomorrow was created in partnership with Guild Education
9
to pay 100% of benefits-eligible employees’ and dependents’ tuition for a broad range of four-year college degree
programs, as well as programs such as high-school equivalency and, for employees, other certificate programs and graduate
degrees. We also provide plans to help employees save for their future; refer to Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information on our employee benefit plans.
Financial Assurance and Insurance Obligations
Financial Assurance
Municipal and governmental waste service contracts generally require contracting parties to demonstrate financial
responsibility for their obligations under the contract. Financial assurance is also a requirement for (i) obtaining or
retaining disposal site or transfer station operating permits; (ii) supporting certain variable-rate tax-exempt debt and
(iii) estimated final capping, closure, post-closure and environmental remedial obligations at many of our landfills. We
establish financial assurance using surety bonds, letters of credit, insurance policies, trust and escrow agreements and
financial guarantees. The type of assurance used is based on several factors, most importantly: the jurisdiction, contractual
requirements, market factors and availability of credit capacity.
Surety bonds and insurance policies are supported by (i) a diverse group of third-party surety and insurance
companies; (ii) an entity in which we have a noncontrolling financial interest or (iii) a wholly-owned insurance captive,
the sole business of which is to issue surety bonds and/or insurance policies on our behalf. Letters of credit generally are
supported by our long-term U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facility (“$3.5 billion revolving credit facility”) and other
credit lines established for that purpose.
Insurance
We carry a broad range of insurance coverages, including health and welfare, general liability, automobile liability,
workers’ compensation, real and personal property, directors’ and officers’ liability, pollution legal liability, cyber incident
liability and other coverages we believe are customary to the industry. Our exposure to loss for insurance claims is
generally limited to the per-incident deductible under the related insurance policy. We use a wholly-owned insurance
captive to insure the deductibles for our general liability, automobile liability and workers’ compensation claims programs.
As of December 31, 2021, both our commercial general liability insurance policy and our workers’ compensation
insurance program carried self-insurance exposures of up to $5 million per incident. As of December 31, 2021, our
automobile liability insurance program included a per-incident deductible of up to $10 million. We do not expect the
impact of any known casualty, property, environmental or other contingency to have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. Our estimated insurance liabilities as of December 31, 2021 are summarized
in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Regulation
Our business is subject to extensive and evolving federal, state or provincial and local environmental, health, safety
and transportation laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are administered by the EPA, Environment Canada,
and various other federal, state, provincial and local environmental, zoning, transportation, land use, health and safety
agencies in the U.S. and Canada. Many of these agencies regularly examine our operations to monitor compliance with
these laws and regulations and have the power to enforce compliance, obtain injunctions or impose civil or criminal
penalties in cases of violations.
Because the primary mission of our business is to collect, process and manage solid waste and recyclables in an
environmentally sound manner, a significant amount of our capital expenditures are related, either directly or indirectly,
to environmental protection measures, including compliance with federal, state, provincial and local rules. There are costs
associated with siting, design, permitting, construction, operations, monitoring, site maintenance, corrective actions,
financial assurance, and facility closure and post-closure obligations. With acquisition, development or expansion of a
waste management or disposal facility, materials recovery facility, compost facility or transfer station, we must often spend
considerable time, effort and money to obtain or maintain required permits and approvals. There are no assurances that we
10
will be able to obtain or maintain required governmental approvals. Once obtained, permits are subject to renewal,
modification, suspension or revocation by the issuing authority. Compliance with current regulations and future
requirements could require us to make significant capital and operating expenditures. However, most of these expenditures
are made in the normal course of business and do not place us at any competitive disadvantage.
The regulatory environment in which we operate is influenced by changes in leadership at the federal, state, provincial
and local levels. The current U.S. administration, for example, has been taking steps towards reinstating, and in some cases
enhancing, policies and regulations rolled back by the previous administration. While increasing regulation may have a
negative impact on our operating costs, extensive environmental regulation applicable to the waste sector is also a barrier
to rapid entry that benefits our Company. Moreover, the risk reduction provided by stringent regulation is valuable to our
customers and the communities we serve.
Federal Regulation
The primary U.S. federal statutes affecting our business are summarized below:
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”), as amended, regulates handling, transporting
and disposing of hazardous and non-hazardous waste and delegates authority to states to develop programs to
ensure the safe disposal of solid waste. Landfills are regulated under Subtitle D of RCRA, which sets forth
minimum federal performance and design criteria for solid waste landfills, and Subtitle C of RCRA, which
establishes a federal program to manage hazardous wastes from cradle to grave. These regulations are typically
implemented by the states, although states can impose requirements that are more stringent than the federal
standards. We incur costs in complying with these standards in the ordinary course of our operations.
We continue to monitor certain developments under RCRA, including relief from increased user fees
accompanying the system that the EPA uses to track hazardous waste shipments electronically, potential changes
to the rules governing the disposal and beneficial use of coal combustion residuals, and clarity on the U.S.
Department of Energy’s progress in establishing a government facility and corresponding fee structure for the
long-term storage and disposal of elemental mercury. We cannot predict what costs we will incur in connection
with these regulations, but we do not anticipate a material impact to our operations. We also are working closely
with both agencies to minimize risks to our industry on these regulatory matters.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), as
amended, which is also known as Superfund, provides for federal authority to respond directly to releases or
threatened releases of hazardous substances into the environment that have created actual or potential
environmental hazards. CERCLA’s primary means for addressing such releases is to impose strict liability for
cleanup of disposal sites upon current and former site owners and operators, generators of the hazardous
substances at the site and transporters who selected the disposal site and transported substances thereto. Liability
under CERCLA is not dependent on the intentional release of hazardous substances; it can be based upon the
release or threatened release of hazardous substances, even resulting from lawful, unintentional and attentive
action, as the term is defined by CERCLA and other applicable statutes and regulations. The EPA may issue
orders requiring responsible parties to perform response actions at sites, or the EPA may seek recovery of funds
expended or to be expended in the future at sites. Liability may include contribution for cleanup costs incurred
by a defendant in a CERCLA civil action or by an entity that has previously resolved its liability to federal or
state regulators in an administrative or judicially-approved settlement. Liability under CERCLA could also
include obligations to a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) that voluntarily expends site clean-up costs. Further,
liability for damage to publicly-owned natural resources may also be imposed. We are subject to potential liability
under CERCLA as an owner or operator of facilities at which hazardous substances have been disposed and as a
generator or transporter of hazardous substances disposed of at other locations.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, known as the Clean Water Act, regulates the
discharge of pollutants into streams, rivers, groundwater, or other surface waters from a variety of sources,
including solid and hazardous waste disposal sites. If our operations discharge any pollutants into federally
protected surface waters, the Clean Water Act requires us to apply for and obtain discharge permits, conduct
sampling and monitoring, and, under certain circumstances, reduce the quantity of pollutants in those discharges.
11
The EPA also requires landfills and other waste-handling facilities to obtain storm water discharge permits, and
if a landfill or other facility discharges wastewater through a sewage system to a publicly-owned treatment works,
the facility must comply with discharge limits imposed by the treatment works. Further, before the development
or expansion of a landfill can alter or affect certain “wetlands,” a permit may have to be obtained providing for
mitigation or replacement wetlands. The Clean Water Act provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties
for violations of its provisions.
The Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended, provides for federal, state and local regulation of the emission of air
pollutants. Many of our municipal solid waste (“MSW”) landfills and landfill gas-to-energy facilities are subject
to regulations implemented under the Clean Air Act, including new source performance standards, emission
guidelines and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. These regulations impose performance
standards to minimize air emissions from regulated MSW landfills, subject those landfills to certain operating
permit requirements under Title V of the Clean Air Act and, in many instances, require installation of landfill gas
collection and control systems to control emissions or to treat and utilize landfill gas on- or off-site.
The EPA finalized a rule in May 2021 implementing landfill gas control and monitoring requirements for older
landfills; however, the regulatory changes contemplated therein are not expected to have a material adverse
impact on our business as a whole. We also are closely monitoring the evolving capabilities of ground, aerial, and
satellite-based methane detection and monitoring systems, and investing in pilot programs to further explore these
innovations. As these technologies are expected to advance rapidly in the coming years, we are continuing to
engage with the EPA on the implications of the changing landscape for the waste industry and potential future
regulation.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (“OSHA”), as amended, establishes certain employer
responsibilities, including maintenance of a workplace free of recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious
injury, compliance with standards promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and
various reporting and record keeping obligations as well as disclosure and procedural requirements. Various
standards for notices of hazards, safety in excavation and demolition work and the handling of asbestos, may
apply to our operations. The Department of Transportation and OSHA, along with other federal agencies, have
jurisdiction over certain aspects of hazardous materials and hazardous waste, including safety, movement and
disposal. Various state and local agencies with jurisdiction over disposal of hazardous waste may seek to regulate
movement of hazardous materials in areas not otherwise preempted by federal law.
OSHA has recently indicated that it will pursue COVID-19 vaccine and testing requirements through a traditional
rulemaking process, and additional vaccine mandates may be announced in jurisdictions in which our businesses
operate. We cannot currently predict the impact of any such vaccine requirements on our workforce.
State, Provincial and Local Regulations
There are also various state or provincial and local regulations that affect our operations. Each state and province in
which we operate has its own laws and regulations governing solid waste disposal, water and air pollution, and, in most
cases, releases and cleanup of hazardous substances and liabilities for such matters. States and provinces have also adopted
regulations governing the design, operation, maintenance and closure of landfills and transfer stations, and laws governing
where recyclable materials can be sold. Some counties, municipalities and other local governments have adopted similar
laws and regulations. Our facilities and operations are likely to be subject to these types of requirements.
Our landfill operations are affected by the increasing preference for alternatives to landfill disposal. Many state and
local governments mandate recycling and waste reduction at the source and prohibit the disposal of certain types of
materials at landfills, such as recyclable materials (cardboard, bottles and cans), yard waste, food waste and electronics.
The number of state and local governments with recycling and diversion requirements and disposal bans continues to
grow, while the logistics and economics of recycling or processing many of these items remain challenging.
Various states have enacted, or are considering enacting, laws that restrict the disposal within the state of solid waste
generated outside the state. While laws that overtly discriminate against out-of-state waste have been found to be
unconstitutional, some laws that are less overtly discriminatory have been upheld in court. From time to time, the U.S.
12
Congress has considered legislation authorizing states to adopt regulations, restrictions, or taxes on the importation of
out - of-state or out-of-jurisdiction waste. Additionally, several state and local governments have enacted “flow control”
regulations, which attempt to require that all waste generated within the state or local jurisdiction be deposited at specific
sites, which has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court for waste directed to facilities owned by the local government.
The U.S. Congress’ adoption of legislation allowing restrictions on interstate transportation of out-of-state or
out - of - jurisdiction waste or certain types of flow control, or courts’ interpretations of interstate waste and flow control
legislation, could adversely affect our solid and hazardous waste management services.
Additionally, regulations establishing extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) are being considered or implemented
in many places around the world, including in the U.S. and Canada. EPR regulations are designed to place either partial
or total responsibility on producers to fund the post-use life cycle of the products they create. Along with the funding
responsibility, producers may be required to undertake additional responsibilities, such as taking over management of local
recycling programs by taking back their products from end users or managing the collection operations and recycling
processing infrastructure. There is no federal law establishing EPR in the U.S. or Canada; however, federal, state,
provincial and local governments could take, and in some cases have taken, steps to implement EPR regulations for
packaging, including traditional recyclables such as cardboard, bottles and cans. If wide-ranging EPR regulations were
adopted, they could have a fundamental impact on the waste, recycling and other streams we manage and how we operate
our business, including contract terms and pricing.
Many states, provinces and local jurisdictions have enacted “fitness” laws that allow the agencies that have jurisdiction
over waste services contracts or permits to deny or revoke these contracts or permits based on the applicant’s or permit
holder’s compliance history. Some states, provinces and local jurisdictions go further and consider the compliance history
of the parent, subsidiaries or affiliated companies, in addition to the applicant or permit holder. These laws authorize the
agencies to make determinations of an applicant’s or permit holder’s fitness to be awarded a contract to operate, and to
deny or revoke a contract or permit because of unfitness, unless there is a showing that the applicant or permit holder has
been rehabilitated through the adoption of various operating policies and procedures put in place to assure future
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. While fitness laws can present potential increased costs and barriers to
entry into market areas, these laws have not, and are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our business as a
whole.
Emerging Trends in Policy and Regulation
Climate and Sustainability
Jurisdictions are increasingly taking action to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions through a broad range of
climate policies. As landfills are emerging as one of the focal points for advancing climate-related goals, we are actively
working with policymakers to ensure they recognize the significant reductions in GHG emissions that the waste sector
already has achieved and the work being done to further reduce emissions, the challenges associated with quantifying
landfill emissions precisely, and the role of our sector in providing an essential, and highly regulated, public service.
In light of regulatory and business developments related to concerns about climate change, we have identified strategic
business opportunities to provide our public and private sector customers with sustainable solutions to reduce their GHG
emissions. As part of our on-going marketing evaluations, we assess customer demand for and opportunities to develop
waste services offering verifiable carbon reductions, such as waste reduction, increased recycling, composting, and
conversion of landfill gas and discarded materials into electricity and fuel. We use carbon life cycle assessment tools in
evaluating potential new services and in establishing the value proposition that makes us attractive as an environmental
service provider. We are active in support of public policies that encourage development and use of lower carbon energy
and waste services that lower users’ carbon footprints. We understand the importance of broad stakeholder engagement in
these endeavors, and actively seek opportunities for public policy discussion on more sustainable materials management
practices. In addition, we work with stakeholders at the federal and state level in support of legislation that encourages
production and use of renewable, low-carbon fuels and electricity.
13
We continue to assess the physical risks to our Company’s operations from the effects of severe weather events and
use risk mitigation planning to increase our resiliency in the face of such events. We are investing in infrastructure to
withstand more severe storm events, which may afford us a competitive advantage and reinforce our reputation as a reliable
service provider through continued service in the aftermath of such events.
Consistent with our Company’s long-standing commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship, we have
published our 2021 Sustainability Report, which details the GHG emissions reductions we have facilitated to date and our
determination to expand these reductions in the future, as well as our commitment to help make the communities in which
found at
we
https://sustainability.wm.com, but it does not constitute a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The Company actively participates in a number of sustainability reporting programs and
frameworks, including being listed on the 2021 Dow Jones Sustainability Index World and North America Indices.
resilient and sustainable. Our 2021 Sustainability Report can be
live and work safe,
PFAS
Efforts to address sites contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) have drawn increased
attention by the federal government and in the states. PFAS are a large group of chemicals that have been used in industrial
and consumer products since the 1940s, including in products as diverse as carpets, paints and stains, water-resistant
clothing and fabrics, nonstick cookware, food packaging, and firefighting chemicals. Possible human health effects of
exposure to certain PFAS compounds may include low infant birth weights, immune system impacts, or cancer. In
October 2021, the EPA released its PFAS Strategic Roadmap, providing a high-level overview of activities that the agency
intends to take through 2024 to address PFAS contamination. These actions include establishing drinking water standards,
expanded authority for PFAS remediation, research and data collection on landfill discharges of PFAS in leachate, new
risk assessments and test procedures, and updated guidance on PFAS disposal and destruction options. Meanwhile, an
increasing number of states have enacted new drinking water, surface water and/or groundwater limits for various PFAS,
which has led to a patchwork of PFAS standards across the U.S. Compliance with new and proposed PFAS standards is
anticipated to result in additional expense to the Company, but such standards are also anticipated to present potential
business opportunities in the area of PFAS management, treatment and disposal.
Recycling; Foreign Import and Export Regulations and Material Restrictions
Enforcement or implementation of foreign and domestic regulations can affect our ability to export recyclables.
Attention on waste in the environment has led to new international laws restricting the flow of certain recyclables. As an
example, on January 1, 2021, new restrictions on the international trade of most plastics went into effect as part of the
Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. At this time,
the U.S. is not a party to the Basel Convention, but most countries to which we export commodities are, which may limit
our ability to export certain plastics.
In recent years, changes in regulations affecting the international flow of recyclables have led to a reduction in export
activity for recyclables, higher quality requirements, and higher processing costs. COVID-19 placed additional financial
stress on recyclers and municipalities, resulting in some recycling programs being paused or eliminated. These changes
have led to a number of states considering EPR regulations.
Prices and demand for recyclables fluctuate. Recycling revenue increased $537 million and $75 million in 2021 and
2020, respectively, as compared with the prior year periods primarily from higher market prices for recycling commodities.
To support recent increases in both quality requirements and demand for commodities, we have increased our investment
in recycling infrastructure and the size of our recycling operations. This, in turn, increases our exposure to commodity
price fluctuations. Additionally, future regulation, tariffs, international trade policies or other initiatives may impact supply
and demand of material, or increase operating costs, which could impact the profitability of our recycling operations.
For the past several years, we have been working with stakeholders to educate the public on the need to recycle
properly. We continue to invest time and effort in working closely with customers to improve the quality of materials
received at our facilities. We have continued our focus on developing a sustainable recycling business model that meets
14
customers’ environmental needs by passing through the increasing cost of processing and higher contamination rates, and
these efforts continued to have a positive impact on the operating results for our recycling business in 2021.
With a heightened awareness of the global problems caused by plastic waste in the environment, an increasing number
of cities and states across the country have passed ordinances banning certain types of plastics from sale or use. The most
common materials banned include plastic bags and straws, polystyrene plastic, and some types of single use packaging.
These bans have increased pressure by manufacturers on our recycling facilities to accept a broader array of materials in
curbside recycling and composting programs to alleviate public pressures to ban the sale of those materials. However, with
no viable end markets for many of these materials, we and other recyclers are working to educate and remind customers
of the need for end market demand and economic viability to support sustainable recycling programs. With increased focus
on responsible management of plastics, our procurement team has taken a proactive approach to ensure environmental
sustainability goals are prioritized in managing the products we buy.
Regulation of Oil and Gas Exploration, Production and Disposal
Our EES business provides specialized environmental management and disposal services for fluids used and wastes
generated by customers engaged in oil and gas exploration and production, and these disposal services include use of
underground injection wells. There is heightened federal regulatory focus on emissions of methane that occur during
drilling and transportation of natural gas, as well as state attention to protective disposal of drilling residuals. There also
remains heightened attention from the public, some states and the EPA to the alleged potential for hydraulic fracturing that
occurs during drilling to impact drinking water supplies. Increased regulation of oil and gas exploration and production,
including GHG emissions or hydraulic fracturing, could make it more difficult or cost-prohibitive for our EES customers
to continue operations, adversely affecting our business.
Additionally, any new regulations regarding the treatment and disposal of wastes associated with exploration and
production operations, including through use of injection wells, could increase our costs to provide oilfield services and
reduce our margins and revenue from such services. Conversely, any loosening of regulations regarding how such wastes
are handled or disposed of could adversely affect our business, as we believe the size, capital structure, regulatory
sophistication and established reliability of our Company provide us with an advantage in providing services that must
comply with any complex regulatory regime that may govern providing oilfield waste services.
Investment in Natural Gas Vehicles and Infrastructure
We operate a large fleet of natural gas vehicles, and we plan to continue to invest in these assets for our collection
fleet. Natural gas fueling infrastructure is not yet broadly available in the U.S. and Canada; as a result, we have constructed
and operate natural gas fueling stations, some of which also serve the public or pre-approved third parties. Concerns have
been raised about the potential for emissions from the fueling stations and infrastructure that serve natural gas-fueled
vehicles. Additional regulation of, or restrictions on, natural gas fueling infrastructure or reductions in associated tax
incentives could increase our operating costs. We are not yet able to evaluate potential operating changes or costs
associated with such regulations, but we do not anticipate that such regulations would have a material adverse impact on
our business.
There is increasing pressure to reduce the use of fossil fuel in the heavy-duty truck industry, and some cities and states
are beginning to discuss requirements for using more advanced engine technology, such as electric powered vehicles,
rather than natural gas or diesel vehicles. This is resulting in a reduction in tax incentives and grants for natural gas trucks.
Although current options for heavy-duty electric vehicles lack sufficient range and proven experience for our operations,
we are proactively engaging in pilots of electric powered heavy - duty vehicles and anticipate that we could redirect future
planned capital investments in our fleet toward these assets when the vehicles prove economically and operationally viable.
Should regulation mandate an accelerated transition to electric powered vehicles, our cost to acquire vehicles needed to
service our customers could increase, capital investment required to establish sufficient charging infrastructure could be
significant and investments we have made in an industry-leading natural gas fleet and infrastructure could be impaired.
15
Renewable Fuel Production
We have invested, and continue to invest, in facilities to capture methane produced from the Company’s landfills and
convert it into RNG. RNG produced from our landfills, as well as dairy biogas, constitute a significant source of fuel for
our natural gas collection vehicles. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
authorized the RFS program that promotes the production and use of renewable transportation fuels. Many of our facilities
are the EPA-registered producers of transportation fuel making compressed and liquefied RNG from landfill biogas, which
qualifies as a cellulosic biofuel under the RFS program. Oil refiners and importers are required through the RFS program
to blend specified volumes of various categories of renewable transportation fuels with gasoline or buy credits, referred to
as RINs, from renewable fuel producers. Market uncertainty related to the EPA’s implementation of the RFS program led
to volatility and declines in the price of RINs between 2017 and 2020. RIN prices rebounded in 2020 in response to a court
ruling limiting the number of small refinery exemptions that the EPA could grant to renewable fuel obligations, and later
following the November 2020 federal elections on the belief that the newly elected presidential administration would result
in stronger enforcement of mandates for RNG and other advanced and conventional biofuels. The market’s expectations
were realized in December 2021, when the EPA proposed robust volumetric standards under the RFS program while
proposing to deny all pending applications for small refinery exemptions. The EPA is expected to propose a rule later in
2022 setting forth the direction of the RFS program for 2023 and years after, which rule is expected to afford additional
opportunities for the biogas sector to participate in the RFS program. We will continue to advocate for the current
administration to implement policies that ensure long term stability for renewable transportation fuels, as changes in the
RFS market or the structure of the RFS program can and has impacted the financial performance of the facilities
constructed to capture and treat the gas.
Environmental Justice
Federal, state, and local governments are also increasingly adopting requirements for environmental justice reviews
as part of certain permitting decisions. These policies generally require permitting agencies to give heightened attention
to the potential for projects to disproportionately impact low-income and minority communities. Our Company supports
policies seeking to advance high standards of environmental performance and the fair treatment of people of all races,
cultures, and incomes. Nevertheless, we are actively monitoring recent regulatory developments in this area as additional
conditions imposed on permitting decisions could increase the time and cost involved to pursue and maintain necessary
permits.
16
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In an effort to keep our stockholders and the public informed about our business, we may make “forward-looking
statements.” Forward-looking statements are often identified by the words, “will,” “may,” “should,” “continue,”
“anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “forecast,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend” and words of a similar nature and
generally include statements regarding:
future results of operations, including revenues, earnings or cash flows;
plans and objectives for the future;
projections, estimates or assumptions relating to our operational or financial performance; or
our opinions, views or beliefs about the effects of current or future events, circumstances or performance.
You should view these statements with caution. These statements are not guarantees of future performance,
circumstances or events. They are based on facts and circumstances known to us as of the date the statements are made.
The following discussion should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
Outlined below are some of the risks that we believe could affect our business and financial statements for 2022 and
beyond and could cause actual results to be materially different from those set forth in forward-looking statements made
by the Company. In addition to the following risks, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that adversely affect
our business, performance, or financial condition in the future that are not presently known or are not currently believed
to be material. The Company continues to be optimistic about volume recovery and overall economic recovery from the
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty remains with respect to various factors that influence the pace
of economic recovery, including the risks discussed below and the potential for future resurgence in transmission of
COVID - 19 and related business closures due to virus variants or otherwise. Such conditions could have an unanticipated
adverse impact on our business. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of
future events, circumstances or developments or otherwise.
Strategy and Operational Risks
If we fail to implement our business strategy, our financial performance and our growth could be materially and
adversely affected.
Our future financial performance and success are dependent in large part upon our ability to implement our business
strategy successfully. Implementation of our strategy will require effective management of our operational, financial and
human resources and will place significant demands on those resources. See Item 1. Business for more information on our
business strategy.
There are risks involved in pursuing our strategy, including the following:
Our employees, customers or investors may not embrace and support our strategy.
We may not be able to hire or retain the personnel necessary to manage our strategy effectively.
A key element of our strategy is yield management through focus on price leadership, which has presented
challenges to keep existing business and win new business at reasonable returns. We have also continued our
environmental fee, fuel surcharge and regulatory recovery fee to offset costs. The loss of volumes as a result of
price increases and our unwillingness to pursue lower margin volumes may negatively affect our cash flows or
results of operations. Additionally, we have in the past and may in the future face purported class action lawsuits
related to our customer service agreements, prices and fees.
We may be unsuccessful in implementing improvements to operational efficiency and such efforts may not yield
the intended result.
We may not be able to maintain cost savings achieved through optimization efforts, due to inflationary cost
pressure or otherwise.
17
Strategic decisions with respect to our asset portfolio may result in impairments to our assets. See Item 1A. Risk
Factors — We may record material charges against our earnings due to impairments to our assets.
Our ability to make strategic acquisitions depends on our ability to identify desirable acquisition targets, negotiate
advantageous transactions despite competition for such opportunities, fund such acquisitions on favorable terms,
obtain regulatory approvals and realize the benefits we expect from those transactions.
Acquisitions, investments and/or new service offerings may not increase our earnings in the timeframe
anticipated, or at all, due to difficulties operating in new markets or providing new service offerings, failure of
emerging technologies to perform as expected, failure to operate within budget, integration issues, or regulatory
issues, among others.
Integration of acquisitions and/or new services offerings could increase our exposure to the risk of inadvertent
noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Liabilities associated with acquisitions, including ones that may exist only because of past operations of an
acquired business, may prove to be more difficult or costly to address than anticipated.
Execution of our strategy, particularly growth through acquisitions, may cause us to incur substantial additional
indebtedness, which may divert capital away from our traditional business operations and other financial plans.
As we complete the integration of our prior acquisition of Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. (“Advanced
Disposal”), we may not continue to realize the strategic benefits and cost synergies anticipated.
We continue to seek to divest underperforming and non-strategic assets if we cannot improve their profitability.
We may not be able to successfully negotiate the divestiture of underperforming and non-strategic operations,
which could result in asset impairments or the continued operation of low-margin businesses.
In addition to the risks set forth above, implementation of our business strategy could also be affected by other factors
beyond our control, such as increased competition, legal developments, government regulation, general economic
conditions, increased operating costs or expenses, subcontractor costs and availability and changes in industry trends. We
may decide to alter or discontinue certain aspects of our business strategy at any time. If we are not able to implement our
business strategy successfully, our long-term growth and profitability may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to
implement some or all of the initiatives of our business strategy successfully, our operating results may not improve to the
extent we anticipate, or at all.
Our operations must comply with extensive existing regulations, and changes in regulations and/or enforcement of
regulations can restrict or alter our operations, increase our operating costs, increase our tax rate, or require us to
make additional capital expenditures.
Stringent government regulations at the federal, state, provincial and local level in the U.S. and Canada have a
substantial impact on our operations, and compliance with such regulations is costly. Many complex laws, rules, orders
and interpretations govern environmental protection, health, safety, land use, zoning, transportation and related matters.
Among other things, governmental regulations and enforcement actions restrict our operations at times and may adversely
affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows by imposing conditions such as:
limitations on siting and constructing new waste disposal, transfer, recycling or processing facilities or on
expanding existing facilities;
limitations, regulations or levies on collection and disposal prices, rates and volumes;
limitations or bans on disposal or transportation of out-of-state waste or certain categories of waste;
mandates regarding the management of solid waste, including requirements to recycle, divert or otherwise process
certain waste, recycling and other streams; or
limitations or restrictions on the recycling, processing or transformation of waste, recycling and other streams.
Regulations affecting the siting, design and closure of landfills require us, at times, to undertake investigatory or
remedial activities, curtail operations or close landfills temporarily or permanently. We have significant financial
18
obligations relating to final capping, closure, post-closure and environmental remediation at our existing landfills and we
establish accruals for these estimated costs. Expenditures could be accelerated or materially exceed our accruals due to the
types of waste collected and manner in which it is transported and disposed of, including actions taken in the past by
companies we have acquired or third-party landfill operators; environmental regulatory changes; new information about
waste types previously collected, such as PFAS or other emerging contaminates, and other reasons.
Additionally, regulations establishing extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) are being considered or implemented
in many places around the world, including in the U.S. and Canada. EPR regulations are designed to place either partial
or total responsibility on producers to fund the post-use life cycle of the products they create. Along with the funding
responsibility, producers may be required to undertake additional responsibilities, such as taking over management of local
recycling programs by taking back their products from end users or managing the collection operations and recycling
processing infrastructure. There is no federal law establishing EPR in the U.S. or Canada; however, federal, state,
provincial and local governments could, and in some cases have, taken steps to implement EPR regulations for packaging,
including traditional recyclables such as cardboard, bottles and cans. If wide-ranging EPR regulations were adopted, they
could have a fundamental impact on the waste streams we manage and how we operate our business, including contract
terms and pricing. A significant reduction in the waste, recycling and other streams we manage could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our business is subject to operational and safety risks, including the risk of personal injury to employees and others.
Providing environmental and waste management services, including constructing and operating landfills, transfer
stations, MRFs and other disposal facilities, involves risks such as truck accidents, equipment defects, malfunctions and
failures. Additionally, we closely monitor and manage landfills to minimize the risk of waste mass instability, releases of
hazardous materials, and odors that are sometimes triggered by weather or natural disasters. There are also risks presented
by the potential for subsurface heat reactions causing elevated landfill temperatures and increased production of leachate,
landfill gas and odors. We also build and operate natural gas fueling stations, some of which also serve the public or third
parties. Operation of fueling stations and landfill gas collection and control systems involves additional risks of fire and
explosion. Any of these risks could potentially result in injury or death of employees and others, a need to shut down or
reduce operation of facilities, increased operating expense and exposure to liability for pollution and other environmental
damage, and property damage or destruction.
While we seek to minimize our exposure to such risks through comprehensive training, compliance and response and
recovery programs, as well as vehicle and equipment maintenance programs, if we were to incur substantial liabilities in
excess of any applicable insurance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Any such incidents could also tarnish our reputation and reduce the value of our brand. Additionally, a major operational
failure, even if suffered by a competitor, may bring enhanced scrutiny and regulation of our industry, with a corresponding
increase in operating expense.
We may be unable to obtain or maintain required permits or expand existing permitted capacity of our landfills, which
could decrease our revenue and increase our costs.
Our ability to meet our financial and operating objectives depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain the
permits necessary to operate landfill sites. Permits to build, operate and expand solid waste management facilities,
including landfills and transfer stations, have become more difficult and expensive to obtain and maintain. Permits often
take years to obtain as a result of numerous hearings and compliance requirements with regard to zoning, environmental
and other regulations. These permits are also often subject to resistance from citizen or other groups and other political
pressures. Local communities and citizen groups, adjacent landowners or governmental agencies may oppose the issuance
of a permit or approval we may need, allege violations of the permits under which we currently operate or laws or
regulations to which we are subjected, or seek to impose liability on us for alleged environmental damage. Federal, state
and local governments are also increasingly adopting requirements for environmental justice reviews as part of certain
permitting decisions. These policies generally require permitting agencies to give heightened attention to the potential for
projects to disproportionately impact low-income and minority communities. Responding to permit challenges has, at
times, increased our costs and extended the time associated with establishing new facilities and expanding existing
facilities. In addition, failure to receive regulatory and zoning approval may prohibit us from establishing new facilities or
19
expanding existing facilities. Our failure to obtain the required permits to operate our landfills could have a material
adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If we are unable to attract, hire or retain key team members and a high-quality workforce, or if our succession
planning does not develop an adequate pipeline of future leaders, it could disrupt our business, jeopardize our
strategic priorities and result in increased costs, negatively impacting our results of operations.
Our operations require us to attract, hire, develop and retain a high-quality workforce to provide a superior customer
experience. This includes key individuals in leadership and specialty roles, as well as a very large number of drivers,
technicians and other front-line and back-office team members necessary to provide our environmental services. We
experience significant competition to hire and retain individuals for certain front-line positions, such as commercial truck
drivers, from within and outside our industry. (Also see Item 1A. Risk Factors — Market disruption, including labor
shortages and supply chain constraints, and macroeconomic pressures, including the heightened pace of inflation, have
adversely impacted our business and results of operations.) Additionally, the market for employees that serve on our
digital team is highly competitive. As we have accelerated our investments in our digital platform, it is increasingly
important that we are able to attract and retain employees with the skills and expertise necessary to implement and manage
our technology - led strategy. We also compete to attract skilled business leaders, and our own key team members are sought
after by our competitors and other companies. We make significant investments, and engage in extensive internal
succession planning, to provide us with a robust pipeline of future leaders. If we are not able to attract, hire, develop and
retain a high-quality workforce with the necessary skills and expertise, as well as key leaders, or if we experience
significant employee turnover, it can result in business and strategic disruption, increased costs, and loss of institutional
knowledge, which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Our business depends on our reputation and the value of our brand.
We believe we have developed a reputation for high-quality service, reliability and social and environmental
responsibility, and we believe our brand symbolizes these attributes. The WM brand name, trademarks and logos and our
reputation are powerful sales and marketing tools, and we devote significant resources to promoting and protecting them.
Adverse publicity, whether or not justified, relating to activities by our operations, employees or agents, or challenges to
our assertions of social and environmental responsibility, could tarnish our reputation and reduce the value of our brand.
Damage to our reputation could reduce demand for our services and potentially have an adverse effect on our financial
condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation and restore
the value of our brand.
We have made significant investments in an extensive natural gas truck fleet, which makes us partially dependent on
the availability of natural gas and fueling infrastructure and vulnerable to natural gas prices, and requirements to
transition to other vehicle types could impair these investments.
We operate a large fleet of natural gas vehicles, and we plan to continue to invest in these assets for our collection
fleet. However, natural gas fueling infrastructure is not yet broadly available in the U.S. and Canada; as a result, we have
constructed and operate natural gas fueling stations, some of which also serve the public or pre-approved third parties. It
will remain necessary for us to invest capital in fueling infrastructure in order to power our natural gas fleet. Concerns
have been raised about the potential for emissions from fueling infrastructure that serve natural gas-fueled vehicles. New
regulation of, or restrictions on, natural gas fueling infrastructure or reductions in associated tax incentives could increase
our operating costs. Additionally, fluctuations in the price and supply of natural gas could substantially increase our
operating expenses; a reduction in the existing cost differential between natural gas and diesel fuel could materially reduce
the benefits we anticipate from our investment in natural gas vehicles. Further, our fuel surcharge program is currently
indexed to diesel fuel prices, and price fluctuations for natural gas may not effectively be recovered by this program.
There is increasing pressure to reduce the use of fossil fuel in the heavy-duty truck industry, and some cities and states
are beginning to discuss requirements for using more advanced engine technology, such as electric powered vehicles,
rather than natural gas or diesel vehicles. This is resulting in a reduction in tax incentives and grants for natural gas trucks.
Although current options for heavy-duty electric vehicles lack sufficient range and proven experience for our operations,
20
we are proactively engaging in pilots of electric powered heavy - duty vehicles and anticipate that we could redirect future
planned capital investments in our fleet toward these assets when the vehicles prove economically and operationally viable.
Should regulation mandate an accelerated transition to electric powered vehicles, our cost to acquire vehicles needed to
service our customers could increase, capital investment required to establish sufficient charging infrastructure could be
significant and investments we have made in an industry-leading natural gas fleet and infrastructure could be impaired.
Increases in our labor costs as a result of labor unions organizing, changes in regulations related to labor unions or
increases in employee minimum wages, could adversely affect our future results.
Labor unions continually attempt to organize our employees, and these efforts will likely continue in the future.
Certain groups of our employees are currently represented by unions, and we have negotiated collective bargaining
agreements with these unions. Additional groups of employees may seek union representation in the future, and, if
successful, would enhance organized labor’s leverage to obtain higher than expected wage and benefits costs and resist
the introduction of new technology and other initiatives, which can result in increased operating expenses and lower net
income. If we are unable to negotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements, our operating expenses could increase
significantly as a result of work stoppages, including strikes. Additionally, a large portion of our workforce are hourly
personnel, and many of these individuals, particularly in our recycling business, are paid at rates related to federal and
state minimum wages. Increases in minimum wage rates, or the enactment of new wage-related legislation, may
significantly increase our labor costs. Any of these matters could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
The seasonal nature of our business, severe weather events resulting from climate change and event driven special
projects cause our results to fluctuate, and prior performance may not be indicative of our future results.
Our operating revenues tend to be somewhat higher in summer months, primarily due to the higher construction and
demolition waste volumes. The volumes of industrial and residential waste in certain regions where we operate also tend
to increase during the summer months. Our second and third quarter revenues and results of operations typically reflect
these seasonal trends.
Service disruptions caused by severe storms, extended periods of inclement weather or climate events can significantly
affect the operating results of the geographic areas affected. On the other hand, certain destructive weather and climate
conditions, such as wildfires in the Western U.S. and hurricanes that most often impact our operations in the Southern and
Eastern U.S. during the second half of the year, can increase our revenues in the geographic areas affected as a result of
the waste volumes generated by these events. While weather-related and other event driven special projects can boost
revenues through additional work for a limited time, due to significant start-up costs and other factors, such revenue can
generate earnings at comparatively lower margins.
For these and other reasons, operating results in any period may not be indicative of operating results for any other
period. Our stock price may be negatively impacted by interim variations in our results.
External Economic and Industry Risks
The COVID-19 global pandemic has caused a significant disruption in social and commercial activity throughout
North America, and the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, or other similar pandemic conditions, may have a
material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
During 2020 and continuing into 2021, federal, state and local governments throughout North America imposed
varying degrees of restriction on social and commercial activity to promote social distancing in an effort to slow the spread
of COVID-19. The pandemic and related measures have had a significant adverse impact on many sectors of the economy,
including environmental services. The initial business closures and negative impact on general economic conditions
resulted in volume declines and reductions in customers’ waste service needs, which negatively impacted our results of
operations and cash flows. In particular, COVID-19 caused decreases in volumes in higher margin businesses, impacting
key financial metrics.
21
Throughout 2021, our volumes recovered from the sharp decline experienced in April 2020, with minimal impact
from the resurgence in transmission of COVID-19 associated with recent virus variants, as communities and businesses
remained open. However, uncertainty remains with respect to various factors that influence the pace of economic recovery,
including factors discussed in the two risk factors immediately below. The potential for future resurgence in transmission
of COVID-19 and related business closures, due to COVID-19 variants or other pandemic conditions, could adversely
impact our volumes and costs in the future. If such conditions were to deepen and extend the broad-based economic
slow - down, it may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and
hinder our ability to grow our business and execute our business strategy. Additionally, if a large portion of our employee
base were to become ill, it could impact our ability to provide timely and reliable service.
Governmental regulations requiring mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of employees could adversely impact our
ability to perform or compete for certain contracts and negatively affect our results of operations.
In September 2021, President Biden issued an executive order requiring all employers with U.S. government contracts
to ensure that their U.S.-based employees, contractors and subcontractors that work on or in support of U.S. government
contracts, with some exceptions, to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. We are currently party to certain service
agreements with the U.S. government. The vaccine mandate is facing legal challenges and currently is enjoined
nationwide. In November 2021, OSHA announced an Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) mandating either full
vaccination against COVID-19 or weekly testing of employees for employers with 100 or more employees; however, the
agency withdrew the ETS in January 2022 following an unfavorable decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. OSHA has
indicated that it will continue to pursue the vaccine and testing requirements of the ETS through the traditional rulemaking
process, and additional vaccine mandates may be announced in jurisdictions in which our businesses operate. We cannot
currently predict the impact of any such vaccine requirements on our workforce, although implementation may result in
our inability to perform or compete for certain contracts, as well as significant cost, operational disruption, attrition and
difficulty securing future labor needs in the already-constrained labor market.
Market disruption, including labor shortages and supply chain constraints, and macroeconomic pressures, including
the heightened pace of inflation, have adversely impacted our business and results of operations.
Certain macroeconomic pressures and market disruption, driven in part by the COVID-19 pandemic, intensified
during the second half of 2021 and are continuing. The constrained labor market has resulted in increased costs for wage
adjustments, overtime hours and training new hires to address operational challenges servicing customers. The COVID - 19
pandemic and the constrained labor market have also contributed to significant global supply chain disruption and
inflationary pressure for the goods and services we purchase, with a particular impact on our repair and maintenance costs.
Supply chain constraints have also caused delayed delivery of fleet, steel containers and other purchases. Aspects of our
business rely on third-party transportation providers, and such services have become more limited and expensive.
Additionally, we are currently experiencing margin pressures from commodity-driven business impacts, particularly from
recycling brokerage rebates and higher fuel prices. The extent and duration of the impact of these labor market, supply
chain and transportation challenges are subject to numerous factors, including the continuing impact of the COVID-19
pandemic; size, location and qualifications of the labor pool; behavioral changes; wage and price structures; adoption of
new or revised regulations; and broader macroeconomic conditions. If we are not able to overcome limitations on labor
availability, it could materially impact our ability to service our customers and our financial results.
Accelerated and pronounced economic pressures, such as the recent inflationary cost pressures on labor and the goods
and services we rely upon to deliver service to our customers, have had and continue to have a significant impact on our
cost structure and capital expenditures. Significant components of our operating expenses vary directly as we experience
changes in revenue due to volume and a heightened pace of inflation, and we may not be able to dynamically manage our
cost structure in response to such changes. A significant portion of our revenue is tied to a price escalation index with a
lookback provision, resulting in a timing lag in our ability to recover increased costs under those contracts during this
period of rapid inflation. Separately, for many of our customers we provide services under multi-year contracts that can
restrict our ability to increase prices and the timing of such increases. Our overall strategic pricing efforts are focused on
recovering as much of the inflationary cost increases we experience in our business as possible by increasing our average
unit rate, but such efforts may not be successful for various reasons including the pace of inflation, operating cost
inefficiencies, contractual limitations, and market responses. The inability to adequately increase prices to offset increased
22
costs and inflationary pressures, or otherwise mitigate the impact of these macroeconomic conditions and market
disruptions on our business, will increase our costs of doing business and reduce our margins. If such impacts are prolonged
and substantial, they could have a material negative effect on our results of operations.
The waste industry is highly competitive, and if we cannot successfully compete in the marketplace, our business,
financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected.
We encounter intense competition from governmental, quasi-governmental and private sources in all aspects of our
operations. We principally compete with large national waste management companies, counties and municipalities that
maintain their own waste collection and disposal operations and regional and local companies of varying sizes and financial
resources. The industry also includes companies that specialize in certain discrete areas of waste management, operators
of alternative disposal facilities, companies that seek to use parts of the waste stream as feedstock for renewable energy
and other by-products, and waste brokers that rely upon haulers in local markets to address customer needs. In recent years,
the industry has seen some additional consolidation, though the industry remains intensely competitive. Counties and
municipalities may have financial competitive advantages because tax revenues are available to them and tax-exempt
financing is more readily available to them. Also, such governmental units may attempt to impose flow control or other
restrictions that would give them a competitive advantage. In addition, some of our competitors may have lower financial
expectations, allowing them to reduce their prices to expand sales volume or to win competitively-bid contracts, including
large national accounts and exclusive franchise arrangements with municipalities. When this happens, we may lose
customers and be unable to execute our pricing strategy, resulting in a negative impact to our revenue growth from yield
on base business.
Our revenues, earnings and cash flows will fluctuate based on changes in commodity prices, and commodity prices
for recyclable materials are particularly susceptible to volatility based on regulations and tariffs that affect our ability
to export products.
Enforcement or implementation of foreign and domestic regulations can affect our ability to export products. Attention
on waste in the environment has led to new international laws restricting the flow of certain recyclables. As an example,
on January 1, 2021, new restrictions on the international trade of most plastics went into effect as part of the Basel
Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. At this time, the U.S.
is not a party to the Basel Convention, but most countries to which we export commodities are, which may limit our ability
to export certain plastics.
In recent years, changes in regulations affecting the international flow of recyclables, have led to a reduction in export
activity for recyclables, higher quality requirements and higher processing costs. COVID-19 placed additional financial
stress on recyclers and municipalities, resulting in some recycling programs being paused or eliminated. These changes
have led to a number of states considering EPR regulations.
Prices and demand for recyclables fluctuate. Recycling revenue increased $537 million and $75 million in 2021 and
2020, respectively, as compared with the prior year periods primarily from higher market prices for recycling commodities.
To support recent increases in both quality requirements and demand for commodities, we have increased our investment
in recycling infrastructure and the size of our recycling operations. This, in turn, increases our exposure to commodity
price fluctuations. Additionally, future regulation, tariffs, international trade policies or other initiatives may impact supply
and demand of material, or increase operating costs, which could impact the profitability of our recycling operations.
Fluctuation in energy prices also affects our business, including recycling of plastics manufactured from petroleum
products. Significant variations in the price of biogas, electricity and other energy-related products that are marketed and
sold by our landfill gas recovery operations can result in a corresponding significant impact to our revenue from yield
from such operations. Additionally, we provide specialized disposal services for oil and gas exploration and production
operations through our EES business. Demand for these services decreases when drilling activity slows due to depressed
oil and gas prices, such as the low prices throughout the last few years. Any of the commodity prices to which we are
subject may fluctuate substantially and without notice in the future.
23
Increasing customer preference for alternatives to landfill disposal and bans on certain types of waste could reduce
our landfill volumes and cause our revenues and operating results to decline.
Our customers are increasingly diverting waste to alternatives to landfill disposal, such as recycling and composting,
while also working to reduce the amount of waste they generate. In addition, many state and local governments mandate
diversion, recycling and waste reduction at the source and prohibit the disposal of certain types of materials at landfills,
such as recyclables (cardboard, bottles and cans), yard waste, food waste and electronics. Where organic waste is not
banned from the landfill, some large customers such as grocery stores and restaurants are choosing to divert their organic
waste from landfills. Zero-waste goals (sending no waste to the landfill) have been set by many of the U.S. and Canada’s
largest companies. Although such mandates and initiatives help to protect our environment, these developments reduce
the volume of waste going to our landfills which may affect the prices that we can charge for landfill disposal. Our landfills
currently provide our highest income from operations margins. If we are not successful in expanding our service offerings,
growing lines of businesses to service waste streams that do not go to landfills, and providing alternative services for
customers that wish to reduce waste entirely, then our revenues and operating results may decline. Additionally, despite
the development of new service offerings and lines of business, it is possible that our revenues and our income from
operations margins could be negatively affected due to disposal alternatives.
With a heightened awareness of the global problems caused by plastic waste in the environment, an increasing number
of cities and states across the country have passed ordinances banning certain types of plastics from sale or use. The most
common materials banned include plastic bags and straws, polystyrene plastic and some types of single use packaging.
These bans have increased pressure by manufacturers on our recycling facilities to accept a broader array of materials in
curbside recycling and composting programs to alleviate public pressures to ban the sale of those materials. However,
there are currently no viable end markets for recycling many of these materials, and inclusion of such materials in our
recycling stream increases contamination and operating costs that can negatively affect the results of our recycling
operations.
General economic conditions can directly and adversely affect revenues for environmental services and our income
from operations margins.
Our business is directly affected by changes in national and general economic factors that are outside of our control,
including consumer confidence, interest rates and access to capital markets. A weak economy generally results in
decreased consumer spending and decreases in volumes of waste generated, which negatively impacts the ability to grow
through new business or service upgrades, and may result in customer turnover and reduction in customers’ waste service
needs. Consumer uncertainty and the loss of consumer confidence may also reduce the number and variety of services
requested by customers. Additionally, a weak market for consumer goods can significantly decrease demand by paper
mills for recycled corrugated cardboard used in packaging; such decrease in demand can negatively impact commodity
prices and our operating income and cash flows.
A decrease in waste volumes generated results in an increase in competitive pricing pressure; such economic
conditions may also interfere with our ability to implement our pricing strategy. Many of our contracts have price
adjustment provisions that are tied to an index such as the Consumer Price Index, and our costs may increase more than
the increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index. This is partially due to our relatively high fixed-cost structure, which is
difficult to quickly adjust to match shifting volume levels and vendor costs, and may not correlate with the Consumer Price
Index or the waste industry.
Weakness in the economy may expose us to credit risk of governmental entities and municipalities and other major
customers, which could negatively impact our financial results.
We provide service to a number of governmental entities, municipalities, and large national accounts. During periods
of economic weakness, governmental entities and municipalities can suffer significant financial difficulties, due in part to
reduced tax revenue and/or high cost structures. During these periods, such entities, and our non-governmental customers,
could be unable to pay amounts owed to us or renew contracts with us at previous or increased rates.
24
Purchasers of our recycling commodities can be particularly vulnerable to financial difficulties in times of commodity
price volatility. The inability of our customers to pay us in a timely manner or to pay increased rates, particularly large
national accounts, could negatively affect our operating results.
In addition, the financial difficulties of municipalities could result in a decline in investors’ demand for municipal
bonds and a correlating increase in interest rates. As of December 31, 2021, we had $645 million of tax-exempt bonds
with term interest rate periods that expire within the next 12 months and $54 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds
with interest rates reset on a weekly basis. If market dynamics resulted in repricing of our tax-exempt bonds at significantly
higher interest rates, we would incur increased interest expenses that may negatively affect our operating results and cash
flows.
The Company’s effective tax rate and tax liability could materially change as a result of the adoption of new tax
legislation and other factors.
Predominantly all of the Company’s revenues are generated in the U.S., and changes in U.S. tax laws could materially
impact our effective tax rate, financial condition and results of operations. The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on
December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Act”), had a significant impact on our effective tax rate, cash tax expenses and net deferred
tax liabilities. The Tax Act reduced the U.S. corporate statutory tax rate and eliminated or limited the deduction of several
expenses that were previously deductible, among other things. However, future changes in tax laws could reverse the
impacts of the Tax Act, and the current presidential administration has previously indicated support for increasing the U.S.
corporate statutory tax rate. If ultimately enacted into law, such an increase could materially impact our tax provision, cash
tax liability, effective tax rate and net deferred tax liabilities.
Significant shortages in diesel fuel supply or increases in diesel fuel prices will increase our operating expenses.
The price and supply of diesel fuel can fluctuate significantly based on international, political and economic
circumstances, as well as other factors outside our control, such as actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting
Countries (“OPEC”) and other oil and gas producers, regional production patterns, weather conditions and environmental
concerns. We need diesel fuel to run a significant portion of our collection and transfer trucks and our equipment used in
our landfill operations. Fuel supply shortages and price increases could substantially increase our operating expenses. We
have in place a fuel surcharge program, designed to offset increased fuel expenses; however, we may not be able to pass
through all of our increased costs and some customers’ contracts prohibit any pass-through of the increased costs.
Additionally, lawsuits have challenged our fuel and environmental charges included on our invoices. Regardless of any
offsetting surcharge programs, increased operating costs due to higher diesel fuel prices will decrease our income from
operations margins.
Technology and Information Security Risks
Developments in technology could trigger a fundamental change in the waste management industry, as waste streams
are increasingly viewed as a resource, which may adversely impact volumes at our landfills and our profitability.
Our Company and others have recognized the value of the traditional waste stream as a potential resource. Research
and development activities are on-going to provide disposal alternatives that maximize the value of waste, including using
waste as a source for renewable energy and other valuable by-products. We and many other companies are investing in
these technologies. It is possible that such investments and technological advancements may reduce the cost of waste
disposal or the value of landfill gas recovery to a level below our costs and may reduce the demand for landfill space. As
a result, our revenues and margins could be adversely affected due to advancements in disposal alternatives.
If we are not able to develop new service offerings and protect intellectual property or if a competitor develops or
obtains exclusive rights to a breakthrough technology, our financial results may suffer.
Our existing and proposed service offerings to customers require that we invest in, develop or license, and protect
new technologies. Our Company and others are increasingly focusing on new technologies that innovate our operations,
25
improve the customer experience and provide alternatives to traditional disposal and maximize the resource value of waste.
We are continuing our multi-year commitment to strategic investments in technology, including accelerated investments
in customer service digitalization. Research, development and implementation of enhanced technology often requires
significant spending that may divert capital investment away from our traditional business operations. We may experience
difficulties or delays in the research, development, production and/or marketing of new products and services or
implementation of technologies in which we have invested, which may negatively impact our operating results and prevent
us from recouping or realizing a return on these investments. Further, protecting our intellectual property rights and
combating unlicensed copying and use of intellectual property is difficult, and inability to obtain or protect new
technologies could impact our services to customers and development of new revenue sources. If a competitor develops
or obtains exclusive rights to a “breakthrough technology” that provides a revolutionary change in traditional waste
management, or if we have inferior intellectual property to our competitors, our financial results may suffer.
We are increasingly dependent on technology in our operations and if our technology fails, our business could be
adversely affected.
We may experience problems with the operation of our current information technology systems or the technology
systems of third parties on which we rely, as well as the development and deployment of new information technology
systems, that could adversely affect, or even temporarily disrupt, all or a portion of our operations until resolved. Inabilities
and delays in implementing new systems can also affect our ability to realize projected cost savings or other benefits.
Significant system failures could impede our ability to timely collect and report financial results in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations. Employee work-from-home arrangements prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic increase
various technology risks, including potential exposure to cyber incidents, loss of data, fraud, internal control challenges
and other disruptions as a consequence of more employees accessing Company systems and information remotely in the
course of their ordinary work.
We are implementing a new enterprise resource planning and human capital management system, and challenges
with the implementation of the system may impact our business and operations.
We are in the process of a complex, multi-year implementation of a new enterprise resource planning and human
capital management (“ERP/HCM”) system. The ERP/HCM system implementation requires the integration of the new
system with multiple new and existing information systems and business processes and is designed to accurately maintain
our books and records and provide information to our management team important to the operation of the business. Such
an implementation is a major undertaking from a financial, management, and personnel perspective, and we have made
interim adjustments to our implementation timeline to accommodate aspects that have proven more difficult, or time
consuming than initially predicted. Any material disruptions, delays, deficiencies or cost increases associated with the
design and implementation of our new ERP/HCM system could adversely affect our ability to produce timely and accurate
financial statements or comply with applicable regulations, resulting in negative impacts on our business and operations
and subject us to potential liability. Additionally, our implementation of the ERP/HCM system involves greater utilization
of third-party “cloud” computing services in connection with our business operations. Problems faced by us or our third-
party providers, including technological or business-related disruptions, as well as cybersecurity threats, could adversely
impact our business, results of operations and financial condition for future periods.
Significant cybersecurity incidents negatively impact our business and our relationships with customers, vendors and
employees and expose us to increased liability.
Substantially all aspects of our business operations rely on digital technology. We use computers, mobile devices,
social networking and other online platforms to connect with our employees, customers, and vendors. These uses give rise
to cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information.
Our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and/or confidential information and
intellectual property, including customers’ personal information, private information about employees, and financial and
strategic information about the Company and its business partners. We also rely on a Payment Card Industry compliant
third party to protect our customers’ credit card information.
26
We are regularly the target of attempted cyber intrusions, and we must commit substantial resources to continuously
monitor and further develop our networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, and address the risk of unauthorized access,
misuse, computer viruses and other events. Our security programs and measures do not prevent all intrusions. Cyber
intrusions require a significant amount of time and effort to assess and remedy, and our incident response efforts may not
be effective in all cases. The Company experienced a cyber intrusion in the first quarter of 2021 that was promptly detected,
and the third-party software vulnerability was quickly remediated. There was no impact to the Company’s operations,
services or financial statements. A subsidiary of WMI provided notice to potentially affected individuals, U.S. state and
federal regulators, and Canadian regulators. As a result of the cyber intrusion, regulatory investigations may result in costs,
fines, penalties, or other obligations. Additionally, a subsidiary of WMI is party to a class action case related to this
incident. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against any such proceedings and does not expect that the
outcome of any proceedings related to the 2021 incident will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; however, assessing and responding to this intrusion required a
significant amount of time and management attention. An incident that results in a material theft, destruction, loss,
misappropriation, or release of sensitive and/or confidential information or intellectual property, or material interference
with our information technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result in
business disruption, direct financial loss, negative publicity, brand damage, alleged violation of privacy laws, loss of
customers, potential regulatory enforcement or private litigation liability and competitive disadvantage. While we do
maintain insurance for cyber incidents, due to policy terms, limits and exclusions, it may not apply in all cases, and it may
not be adequate to cover all liabilities incurred.
As the Company pursues its strategy to grow through acquisitions and to pursue new initiatives that improve our
operations and cost structure, the Company is also expanding and improving its information technologies, resulting in a
larger technological presence and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity risk. Certain new technologies, such as use of
autonomous vehicles, remote-controlled equipment and virtual reality, present new and significant cybersecurity safety
risks that must be analyzed and addressed before implementation. If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks
associated with acquisitions and new initiatives, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks.
Increased regulation by state and federal governments related to cybersecurity protections and disclosures may require
additional resources for compliance, and any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address new requirements
could subject us to regulatory enforcement, private litigation, public criticism, disrupt our operations, cause us to lose
customers, result in additional costs and legal liability, damage our reputation, and otherwise harm our business.
Increasing regulatory focus on privacy and data protection issues and expanding laws could negatively impact our
business, subject us to criticism and expose us to increased liability.
The legislative and regulatory framework for privacy and data protection issues worldwide is rapidly evolving and is
likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. We collect certain personally identifiable information and other
sensitive information as integral parts of our business and in connection with providing services to our customers. We are
subject to a variety of laws and regulations that govern the collection and use of such information obtained from individuals
and businesses. These laws and regulations are inconsistent across jurisdictions and are subject to evolving interpretations.
Government officials, regulators, privacy advocates and class action attorneys are increasingly scrutinizing how companies
collect, process, use, store, share and transmit personal data. We must continually monitor the development and adoption
of new and emerging laws and regulations and commit substantial time and resources towards compliance with new laws
and regulations. These laws provide disclosure obligations for businesses that collect personal information, individual
rights relating to personal information, collection and storage requirements, automated decision-making transparency, and
potential liability expansion. Any inability, or perceived inability, to adequately address privacy and data protection
concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable laws, regulations, policies, industry standards, contractual
obligations, or other legal obligations, including at newly acquired companies, could subject us to regulatory enforcement,
private litigation, public criticism, disrupt our operations, cause us to lose customers, result in additional costs and legal
liability, damage our reputation, and otherwise harm our business.
27
Legal, Regulatory and Compliance Risks
Our operations are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, as well as contractual
obligations that may result in significant liabilities.
There is risk of incurring significant environmental liabilities in the use, treatment, storage, transfer and disposal of
waste materials. Under applicable environmental laws and regulations, we could be liable if it is alleged that our operations
cause environmental damage to our properties or to the property of other landowners, particularly as a result of the
contamination of air, drinking water or soil. Under current law, we could also be held liable for damage caused by
conditions that existed before we acquired the assets or operations involved and for conditions resulting from waste types
or compounds previously considered non-hazardous but later determined to present possible threat to public health or the
environment. The risks of successor liability and emerging contaminants are of particular concern as we execute our
growth strategy, partially through acquisitions, because we may be unsuccessful in identifying and assessing potential
liabilities during our due diligence investigations. Further, the counterparties in such transactions may be unable to perform
their indemnification obligations owed to us. Any substantial liability for environmental damage could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In the ordinary course of our business, we have in the past, we are currently, and we may in the future, become
involved in legal and administrative proceedings relating to land use and environmental laws and regulations. These
include proceedings in which governmental entities, private groups or individuals seek to impose liability on us for alleged
environmental damage or violation of statutes or desire to revoke or deny permits required for our operations. We generally
seek to work with the authorities or other persons involved in these proceedings to resolve any issues raised. If we are not
successful, the adverse outcome of one or more of these proceedings could result in, among other things, material increases
in our costs or liabilities as well as material charges for asset impairments.
Further, we often enter into agreements with landowners imposing obligations on us to meet certain regulatory or
contractual conditions upon site closure or upon termination of the agreements. Compliance with these agreements
inherently involves subjective determinations and may result in disputes, including litigation. Costs to remediate or restore
the condition of closed sites may be significant.
Changes to federal and state renewable fuel policies could affect our financial performance in that sector as a
renewable fuel producer and impact our projected future investments.
The primary drivers of renewable fuel development at our landfills are federal and state incentive programs, such as
the federal RFS program and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard. At the federal level, oil refiners and importers are
required through the RFS program to blend specified volumes of renewable transportation fuels with gasoline or buy
credits, referred to as RINs, from renewable fuel producers. The Company has invested, and continues to invest, in facilities
that capture and convert landfill and dairy digester gas into renewable natural gas so that we can participate in the program,
and the Company has stated its intention to grow its asset base to notably increase its RNG production by 2026. RINs
prices generally respond to regulations enacted by the EPA or other regulatory bodies, as well as fluctuations in supply
and demand. The value of the RINs associated with renewable natural gas is set through a market established by the
program. Each year, the EPA is required to finalize a rule establishing refiners’ obligations to purchase renewable natural
gas and other cellulosic biofuels under the RFS program. Market uncertainty stemming from these annual rulemakings, as
well as the EPA’s administration of other aspects of the RFS program, led to a rapid decline in RIN values in 2019 and
much of 2020 before rebounding in November 2020. We will continue to advocate for the current administration to
implement policies that ensure long - term stability for renewable transportation fuels. Changes in the RFS market, the
structure of the RFS program or RINs prices and demand can and has impacted the financial performance of the facilities
constructed to capture and treat the gas and could impact or alter our projected future investments.
The impact of climate change, and the adoption of climate change legislation or regulations restricting emissions of
greenhouse gases, could increase our costs to operate.
We continue to assess the physical risks to our operations from the effects of climate change. Although we have made
investments to mitigate risk associated with severe storm events, damage to our facilities or disruption of service caused
28
by more frequent or more severe storms associated with climate extremes could negatively impact operating results. We
have also identified risk to our assets and our employees associated with drought or water scarcity, flooding, extreme heat
and rain events, and fire conditions associated with climate change. For example, wildfires influenced by climate change
can damage landfill infrastructure such as gas collection systems, flooding in low-lying areas enhanced by sea level rise
can result in greater maintenance expenses at our facilities and service disruption, and more frequent or extreme rain events
can erode the protective vegetative caps on our landfills and generate increased volumes of leachate to manage. Those
areas of the country most prone to these occurrences have protocols in place, or are developing protocols to address these
conditions, including employee safety, driver training, and equipment and facility protection protocols. We have incurred
and will incur costs to develop and implement these protocols, and these protocols may not be effective in offsetting these
risks. Additionally, the actions of others in response to climate change effects, such as the rolling power blackouts
implemented in California in 2019 due to wildfire risks, can result in service disruptions and increase our costs to operate.
Our landfill operations emit methane, identified as a GHG. There are a number of legislative and regulatory efforts at
the state, provincial, regional and federal levels to cap and/or curtail the emission of GHGs to ameliorate the effect of
climate change. We continue to monitor these efforts and the potential impacts to our operations. Should comprehensive
federal climate change legislation be enacted, we expect it could impose costs on our operations that might not be offset
by the revenue increases associated with our lower-carbon service options, the materiality of which we cannot predict.
We could be subject to significant fines and penalties, and our reputation could be adversely affected, if our
businesses, or third parties with whom we have a relationship, were to fail to comply with U.S. or foreign laws or
regulations.
Some of our projects and new business may be conducted in countries where corruption has historically been
prevalent. It is our policy to comply with all applicable anti-bribery laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,
and with applicable local laws of the foreign countries in which we operate, and we monitor our local partners’ compliance
with such laws as well. Our reputation may be adversely affected if we were reported to be associated with corrupt practices
or if we or our local partners failed to comply with such laws. Additionally, violations of such laws could subject us to
significant fines and penalties.
Currently pending or future litigation or governmental proceedings could result in material adverse consequences,
including judgments or settlements.
As a large company with operations across the U.S. and Canada, we are subject to various proceedings, lawsuits,
disputes and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business, including governmental proceedings. Actions that have
been filed against us, and that may be filed against us in the future, include personal injury, property damage, commercial,
customer, and employment-related claims, including purported state and national class action lawsuits related to:
alleged environmental contamination, including releases of hazardous materials and odors;
sales and marketing practices, customer service agreements, prices and fees; and
federal and state wage and hour and other laws.
The timing of the final resolutions to these types of matters is often uncertain. Additionally, the possible outcomes or
resolutions to these matters could include adverse judgments or settlements, either of which could require substantial
payments, adversely affecting our liquidity.
Financial Risks
Our capital requirements and our business strategy could increase our expenses, cause us to change our growth and
development plans, or result in an inability to maintain our desired credit profile.
If economic conditions or other risks and uncertainties cause a significant reduction in our cash flows from operations,
we may reduce or suspend capital expenditures, growth and acquisition activity, implementation of our business strategy,
dividend declarations or share repurchases. We may choose to incur indebtedness to pay for these activities, although our
29
access to capital markets is not assured and we may not be able to incur indebtedness at a cost that is consistent with
current borrowing rates. We also may need to incur indebtedness to refinance scheduled debt maturities, and it is possible
that the cost of financing could increase significantly, thereby increasing our expenses and decreasing our net income.
Further, our ability to execute our financial strategy and our ability to incur indebtedness is somewhat dependent upon our
ability to maintain investment grade credit ratings on our senior debt. The credit rating process is contingent upon our
credit profile and several other factors, many of which are beyond our control, including methodologies established and
interpreted by third-party rating agencies. If we were unable to maintain our investment grade credit ratings in the future,
our interest expense would increase and our ability to obtain financing on favorable terms could be adversely affected.
Additionally, we have $2.5 billion of debt as of December 31, 2021 that is exposed to changes in market interest rates
within the next 12 months because of the impact of our commercial paper borrowings and tax-exempt bonds. If interest
rates increase, our interest expense would also increase, lowering our net income and decreasing our cash flow.
We may use our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility to meet our cash needs, to the extent available, until maturity in
November 2024. As of December 31, 2021, we had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. We had $167 million
of letters of credit issued and $1.8 billion of outstanding borrowings (net of related discount on issuance) under our
commercial paper program, both supported by this facility, leaving unused and available credit capacity of $1.5 billion as
of December 31, 2021. In the event of a default under our credit facility, we could be required to immediately repay all
outstanding borrowings and make cash deposits as collateral for all obligations the facility supports, which we may not be
able to do. Additionally, any such default could cause a default under many of our other credit agreements and debt
instruments. Without waivers from lenders party to those agreements, any such default would have a material adverse
effect on our ability to continue to operate.
We have substantial financial assurance and insurance requirements and increases in the costs of obtaining adequate
financial assurance, or the inadequacy of our insurance coverages, could negatively impact our liquidity and increase
our liabilities.
The amount of insurance we are required to maintain for environmental liability is governed by statutory requirements.
We also carry a broad range of other insurance coverages that are customary for a company our size. To the extent our
obligations for claims are more than we estimated, our insurance coverage is inadequate to cover our obligations, or our
insurers are unable to meet their obligations, the requirement that we pay such obligations could have a material adverse
effect on our financial results.
In addition, to fulfill our financial assurance obligations with respect to variable-rate tax-exempt debt, and final
capping, closure, post-closure and environmental remediation obligations, we generally obtain letters of credit or surety
bonds, rely on insurance, including captive insurance, fund trust and escrow accounts or rely upon WMI financial
guarantees. Our financial position, which can be negatively affected by asset impairments, our credit profile and general
economic factors, may increase the cost of our current financial assurance instruments, and changes in regulations may
impose stricter requirements on the types of financial assurance that will be accepted. In the event we are unable to obtain
sufficient surety bonding, letters of credit or third-party insurance coverage at reasonable cost, or one or more states cease
to view captive insurance as adequate coverage, we would need to rely on other forms of financial assurance. It is possible
that we could be required to deposit cash to collateralize certain obligations, which could negatively impact our liquidity.
We may record material charges against our earnings due to impairments to our assets.
In accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), we capitalize certain expenditures and
advances relating to disposal site development, expansion projects, acquisitions, software development costs and other
projects. Events that have in the past and may in the future lead to an impairment include, but are not limited to, shutting
down a facility or operation or abandoning a development project or the denial of an expansion permit. Additionally,
declining waste volumes and development of, and customer preference for, alternatives to traditional waste disposal could
warrant asset impairments. If we determine an asset or expansion project is impaired, we will charge against earnings any
unamortized capitalized expenditures and advances relating to such asset or project reduced by any portion of the
capitalized costs that we estimate will be recoverable, through sale or otherwise. We also carry a significant amount of
30
goodwill on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, which is required to be assessed for impairment annually, and more
frequently in the case of certain triggering events. We have in the past and may in the future be required to incur charges
against earnings if such impairment tests indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount. Any
such charges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We could face significant liabilities for withdrawal from Multiemployer Pension Plans.
We are a participating employer in a number of trustee-managed multiemployer defined benefit pension plans
(“Multiemployer Pension Plans”) for employees who are covered by collective bargaining agreements. In the event of our
withdrawal from a Multiemployer Pension Plan, we may incur expenses associated with our obligations for unfunded
vested benefits at the time of the withdrawal. Depending on various factors, including potential legislative changes, future
withdrawals could have a material adverse effect on results of operations or cash flows for a particular reporting period,
and our on-going costs of participation in Multiemployer Pension Plans may increase. See Notes 9 and 10 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our participation in Multiemployer Pension Plans.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
Our principal executive offices are in Houston, Texas where we lease approximately 297,000 square feet under a lease
expiring in 2035. We also have administrative offices in Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois and India. We own or lease real
property in most locations where we have operations or administrative functions. We have operations in all 50 states except
Montana, the District of Columbia and throughout Canada.
Our principal property and equipment consist of land (primarily landfills and other disposal facilities, transfer stations
and bases for collection operations), buildings, vehicles and equipment. We believe that our operating properties, vehicles
and equipment are adequately maintained and sufficient for our current operations. However, we expect to continue to
make investments in additional property and equipment for expansion, for the replacement of aging assets and investment
in assets that support our strategy of continuous improvement through efficiency and innovation. For more information,
see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included within this
report.
The following table summarizes our various operations as of December 31:
Landfills owned or operated (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Material recovery facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
260
340
96
268
348
103
2021
2020
(a) As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, our landfills owned or operated consisted of total acreage of 173,071 and 172,217;
permitted acreage of 45,897 and 45,642; and expansion acreage of 674 and 716, respectively. Total acreage includes
permitted acreage, expansion acreage, other acreage available for future disposal that has not been permitted, buffer
land and other land. Permitted acreage consists of all acreage at the landfill encompassed by an active permit to dispose
of waste. Expansion acreage consists of unpermitted acreage where the related expansion efforts meet our criteria to
be included as expansion airspace. A discussion of the related criteria is included within Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Estimates and
Assumptions included within this report.
31
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Information regarding our legal proceedings can be found under the Environmental Matters and Litigation sections
of Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included within this report.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Information concerning mine safety and other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this annual report.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “WM.” The number of
holders of record of our common stock on February 9, 2022 was 8,099.
32
The graph below shows the relative investment performance of Waste Management, Inc. common stock, the
S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones Waste & Disposal Services Index for the last five years, assuming reinvestment of
dividends at date of payment into the common stock. The graph is presented pursuant to SEC rules and is not meant to be
an indication of our future performance.
Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return
Waste Management, Inc.
S&P 500 Index
Dow Jones Waste & Disposal Services Index
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
12/31/16
12/31/17
12/31/18
12/31/19
12/31/20
12/31/21
Waste Management, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dow Jones Waste & Disposal Services Index . . . .
12/31/16 12/31/17 12/31/18 12/31/19 12/31/20 12/31/21
259
233
236
171 $
153 $
158 $
180
181
169
131
116
117
124
122
117
100
100
100
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The Company repurchases shares of its common stock as part of capital allocation programs authorized by our Board
of Directors. During 2021, we allocated an aggregate of $1.35 billion in cash under our accelerated share repurchase
(“ASR”) agreements. As of December 31, 2021, we had received 8.7 million shares with a weighted average price per
share of $146.61. In January 2022, we completed our ASR agreement executed in December 2021, at which time we
received an additional 0.4 million shares. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
33
The following table summarizes common stock repurchases made during the fourth quarter of 2021 (shares in
millions):
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
October 1 — 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November 1 — 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 1 — 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
Number of
Shares
Average
Price Paid
Purchased per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
Approximate Maximum
Dollar Value of Shares that
May Yet be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
—
—
— $
— $
2.2
2.2
$ 159.32 (a)
$ 159.32
— $
— $
2.2
$
2.2
350 million
350 million
1.5 billion (b)
(a) In August 2021, we entered into an ASR agreement to repurchase $500 million of our common stock. At the beginning
of the repurchase period, we delivered $500 million in cash and received 2.7 million shares based on a stock price of
$147.27. The ASR agreement completed in the fourth quarter of 2021, at which time we received 0.5 million additional
shares based on a final weighted average price of $154.72.
In December 2021, we executed an ASR agreement to repurchase $350 million of our common stock. At the beginning
of the repurchase period, we delivered $350 million in cash and received 1.7 million shares based on a stock price of
$160.67. The ASR agreement completed in January 2022, at which time we received 0.4 million additional shares
based on a final weighted average price of $160.33.
The “Average Price Paid per Share” in the table represents the final weighted average price per share paid for the ASR
agreement executed in August 2021 and the initial price per share paid for the ASR agreement executed in
December 2021.
(b) We announced in December 2021 that the Board of Directors has authorized up to $1.5 billion in future share
repurchases.
Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on various factors
including our net earnings, financial condition and cash required for future business plans, growth and acquisitions.
Item 6. [Reserved]
None.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This section includes a discussion of our results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2021. This
discussion may contain forward-looking statements that anticipate results based on management’s plans that are subject
to uncertainty. We discuss in more detail various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
expectations in Item 1A. Risk Factors. The following discussion should be read considering those disclosures and together
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
Overview
We are North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, providing
services throughout the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. We partner with our residential, commercial, industrial and
municipal customers and the communities we serve to manage and reduce waste at each stage from collection to disposal,
while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. We own or operate the largest network of
landfills throughout the U.S. and Canada. In order to make disposal more practical for larger urban markets, where the
distance to landfills is typically farther, we manage transfer stations that consolidate, compact and transport waste
efficiently and economically. We also use waste to create energy, recovering the gas produced naturally as waste
34
decomposes in landfills and using the gas in generators to make electricity or natural gas. Additionally, we are a leading
recycler in the U.S. and Canada, handling materials that include paper, cardboard, glass, plastic and metal. Our “Solid
Waste” business is operated and managed locally by our subsidiaries that focus on distinct geographic areas and provide
collection, transfer, disposal, and recycling and resource recovery services. Consistent with our Company’s long-standing
commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship, we published our 2021 Sustainability Report, which details
our people-first commitment to help make the communities in which we live and work safe, resilient and sustainable. The
information in this report can be found at https://sustainability.wm.com but it does not constitute a part of, and is not
incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10 - K. For further discussion see section “Regulation –
Emerging Trends in Policy and Regulation – Climate and Sustainability” in Item 1.
In 2021, our senior management began evaluating, overseeing and managing the financial performance of our Solid
Waste operations through two operating segments. Our East Tier primarily consists of geographic areas located in the
Eastern U.S., the Great Lakes region and substantially all of Canada. Our West Tier primarily includes geographic areas
located in the Western U.S., including the upper Midwest region, and British Columbia, Canada. Each of our Solid Waste
operating segments provides integrated environmental services, including collection, transfer, recycling, and disposal. The
Company finalized the assessment of our segments during the fourth quarter of 2021. The East and West Tiers are
presented in this report and constitute our existing Solid Waste business.
Our Solid Waste operating revenues are primarily generated from fees charged for our collection, transfer, disposal,
and recycling and resource recovery services, and from sales of commodities by our recycling and landfill gas-to-energy
operations. Revenues from our collection operations are influenced by factors such as collection frequency, type of
collection equipment furnished, type and volume or weight of the waste collected, distance to the disposal facility or
material recovery facility and our disposal costs. Revenues from our landfill operations consist of tipping fees, which are
generally based on the type and weight or volume of waste being disposed of at our disposal facilities. Fees charged at
transfer stations are generally based on the weight or volume of waste deposited, taking into account our cost of loading,
transporting and disposing of the solid waste at a disposal site. Recycling revenues generally consist of tipping fees and
the sale of recycling commodities to third parties. The fees we charge for our services generally include our environmental,
fuel surcharge and regulatory recovery fees which are intended to pass through to customers direct and indirect costs
incurred. We also provide additional services that are not managed through our Solid Waste business, described under
Results of Operations below.
Acquisition of Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. (“Advanced Disposal”)
On October 30, 2020, we completed our acquisition of all outstanding shares of Advanced Disposal for $30.30 per
share in cash, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 14, 2019, as amended on June 24, 2020. Total
enterprise value of the acquisition was $4.6 billion when including approximately $1.8 billion of Advanced Disposal’s net
debt. This acquisition grew our footprint and allows us to provide differentiated, sustainable waste management and
recycling services to approximately three million new commercial, industrial and residential customers primarily located
in the Eastern half of the U.S. The acquisition was funded using a $3.0 billion, 364-day, U.S. revolving credit facility
(“364-day revolving credit facility”) and our commercial paper program. In November 2020, we issued $2.5 billion of
senior notes and used a portion of the proceeds to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day revolving credit
facility at which time it was terminated. As a result of the acquisition we recorded $4.1 billion of net assets including
$2.5 billion of goodwill as of December 31, 2020. Post-closing adjustments to our purchase price allocation were not
material.
In connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, we and Advanced Disposal entered into an agreement that
provided for GFL Environmental to acquire a combination of assets from us and Advanced Disposal to address divestitures
required by the U.S. Department of Justice. Immediately following the acquisition, the divestiture transactions were
consummated and the Company subsequently received cash proceeds from the sale of $856 million.
See Note 11 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
35
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred $51 million of integration related costs, and for the year ended
December 31, 2020, we incurred $156 million of acquisition and integration related costs, which were primarily classified
as “Selling, general and administrative expenses”. The post-closing operating results of Advanced Disposal have been
included in our consolidated financial statements, within our existing reportable segments. Post-closing through
December 31, 2020, Advanced Disposal recognized $205 million, $142 million and $60 million of revenue, operating
expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, which are included in our Consolidated Statement
of Operations. During 2021, we made significant progress on our integration of Advanced Disposal. The focus of these
efforts has been to ensure that we continue to provide uninterrupted service to our customers through the integration of
certain customer facing and back office digital platforms.
COVID-19 Update
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has proactively taken steps to put our employees’ and customers’
needs first and we continue to work with the appropriate regulatory agencies to ensure we can provide our essential services
safely and efficiently. We continue to operate with a focus on protecting the health and safety of our employees and
maintaining business continuity for our customers. These efforts, combined with our disciplined execution in our daily
operations, have positioned the Company to prudently manage the challenges presented by COVID-19.
The impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy increased rapidly during the second quarter of 2020, affecting our
business in most geographies and across a variety of our customer types. Over the last year, our volumes have been
recovering from the sharp decline experienced in April 2020 as a result of COVID-19. The pace of recovery in our volumes
accelerated in the second quarter of 2021, and continued in the back-half of 2021 with minimal impact from the resurgence
in transmission of recent COVID-19 virus variants as communities and businesses remained open. The portions of our
business that had the most pronounced decreases in volume due to the pandemic were our industrial and commercial
collection businesses and construction and demolition and special waste volumes at our landfills. As we completed 2021,
volumes in each of these lines of business were either on par with pre-pandemic levels or have now surpassed 2019
volumes. We continue to be optimistic about our volume recovery and overall economic recovery from the impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty remains with respect to various factors that influence the pace of economic
recovery and the potential for future resurgence in transmission of COVID-19 and related business closures due to virus
variants or otherwise. Such conditions could adversely impact our volumes and costs in the future.
Business Environment
The waste industry is a comparatively mature and stable industry. However, customers increasingly expect more of
their waste materials to be recovered and those waste streams are becoming more complex. In addition, many state and
local governments mandate diversion, recycling and waste reduction at the source and prohibit the disposal of certain types
of waste at landfills. We monitor these developments to adapt our service offerings. As companies, individuals and
communities look for ways to be more sustainable, we promote our comprehensive services that go beyond our core
business of collecting and disposing of waste in order to meet their needs. This includes expanding traditional recycling
services, increasing organics collection and processing, and expanding our renewable energy projects to meet the evolving
needs of our diverse customer base. As the leading waste management environmental services provider in North America,
we are taking big, bold steps in an effort to catalyze positive change – change that will impact our Company as well as the
communities we serve. Our sustainability agenda includes expanding recycling and focuses on meeting or exceeding
specific 2025 and 2038 sustainability goals around people, customers, the environment, and community, which align with
eight of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
We encounter intense competition from governmental, quasi - governmental and private service providers based on
pricing, and to a much lesser extent, the nature of service offerings, particularly in the residential line of business. Our
industry is directly affected by changes in general economic factors, including increases and decreases in consumer
spending, business expansions and construction activity. These factors generally correlate to volumes of waste generated
and impact our revenue. Negative economic conditions, including the impact of COVID-19, can and have caused
customers to reduce their service needs. Such negative economic conditions, in addition to competitor actions, can and
have made it more challenging to implement our pricing strategy and negotiate, renew or expand service contracts with
acceptable margins. We also encounter competition for acquisitions and growth opportunities. General economic factors
36
and the market for consumer goods, in addition to regulatory developments, can also significantly impact commodity
prices for the recyclable materials we sell. Significant components of our operating expenses vary directly as we experience
changes in revenue due to volume and a heightened pace of inflation. Volume changes can fluctuate dramatically by line
of business and volume changes in higher margin businesses, such as what we saw with COVID-19, can impact key
financial metrics. We must dynamically manage our cost structure in response to volume changes and cost inflation.
We believe the Company’s industry-leading asset network and strategic focus on investing in our people and our
digital platform will give the Company the necessary tools to address the evolving challenges impacting the Company and
our industry. In line with our commitment to continuous improvement and a differentiated customer experience, we remain
focused on our customer service digitalization initiative to change the way we interact with our customers. Enhancements
made through this initiative are intended to seamlessly and digitally connect all the Company’s functions required to
service our customers in order to provide the best experience and service. Additionally, in early 2022, we substantially
implemented our new enterprise resource planning system which will drive operational and service excellence by
empowering our people through a modern, simplified and connected employee experience.
Certain macroeconomic pressures and market disruption, driven in part by the COVID-19 pandemic, intensified
during the second half of 2021 and are continuing. The constrained labor market has resulted in increased costs for wage
adjustments, overtime hours and training new hires to address frontline employee turnover, increased volume, and
operational challenges servicing customers. The COVID-19 pandemic and the constrained labor market have also
contributed to significant global supply chain disruption and inflationary pressure for the goods and services we purchase,
with a particular impact on our repair and maintenance costs. Supply chain constraints have also caused delayed delivery
of fleet, steel containers and other purchases. Aspects of our business rely on third-party transportation providers, and such
services have become more limited and expensive. Additionally, we are currently experiencing margin pressures from
commodity-driven business impacts, particularly from recycling brokerage rebates and higher fuel prices. The extent and
duration of the impact of these labor market, supply chain and transportation challenges are subject to numerous factors,
including the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; size, location and qualifications of the labor pool; behavioral
changes; wage and price structures; adoption of new or revised regulations, including vaccine mandates; and broader
macroeconomic conditions. As costs increase, we focus on our strategic pricing efforts, as well as operating efficiencies
and cost controls, to maintain and grow our earnings and cash flow. With increased pressure from the strong economic
recovery, particularly on labor, we remain focused on putting our people first to ensure that they are well positioned to
diligently and safely execute our daily operations. We are encouraged by our results in 2021 and remain focused on
delivering outstanding customer service, managing our variable costs with changing volumes and investing in technology
that will enhance our customers’ experience and reduce our cost to serve.
37
Current Year Financial Results
During 2021, we delivered strong revenue and income from operations as we continued to experience higher yield
and volume recovery in our landfill, commercial and industrial collection businesses and benefited from the acquisition of
Advanced Disposal. However, our income from operations was impacted by constraints on labor availability and
inflationary cost pressures, primarily in the second half of 2021. We continue to invest in our people through market wage
adjustments, investments in our digital platform and training for new team members. In addition, we are focused on
executing on our disciplined pricing programs to drive margin growth in the face of these additional labor cost and
inflationary pressures. We also made significant investments in recycling automation technology and customer service
digitalization to further support our continued focus on optimizing operational efficiency as well as achieving improved
labor productivity for all lines of business. During 2021, the Company allocated $1,904 million of available cash to capital
expenditures. We also allocated $2,320 million of available cash to our shareholders during 2021 through dividends and
common stock repurchases.
Key elements of our 2021 financial results include:
Revenues of $17,931 million for 2021 compared with $15,218 million in 2020, an increase of $2,713 million, or
17.8%. The increase is primarily attributable to (i) the acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (ii) record-high
increases in the market prices for recycling commodities we sell; (iii) higher yield in our collection and disposal
lines of business and (iv) strong volume growth;
Operating expenses of $11,111 million in 2021, or 62.0% of revenues, compared with $9,341 million, or 61.4% of
revenues, in 2020. The $1,770 million increase is primarily attributable to (i) increased volumes from the
acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (ii) commodity-driven business impacts, particularly from recycling brokerage
rebates and higher fuel prices, which also meaningfully impacted our operating expense as a percentage of
revenue; (iii) volume recovery from earlier pandemic lows; (iv) labor cost pressure from frontline employee wage
adjustments, increased turnover driving up training costs and higher overtime due to driver shortages and volume
growth and (v) inflationary cost pressures, primarily in the second half of 2021;
Selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,864 million in 2021, or 10.4% of revenues, compared with
$1,728 million, or 11.4% of revenues, in 2020. The $136 million increase is primarily attributable to (i) higher
incentive compensation costs; (ii) strategic investments in our digital platform and (iii) increased labor, support
and integration costs following our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. These cost increases are partially offset by
(i) lower consulting, advisory and legal fees associated with our completion of the Advanced Disposal acquisition
in 2020 and (ii) a decrease in our provision for bad debts as collections returned to pre-pandemic levels;
Income from operations of $2,965 million, or 16.5% of revenues, in 2021 compared with $2,434 million, or
16.0% of revenues, in 2020. The improved earnings in the current year are driven by (i) strong operating results
in our collection and disposal business; (ii) improved profitability in our recycling business; (iii) lower
transaction-related costs following our 2020 acquisition of Advanced Disposal and (iv) improved profitability in
our WM Renewable Energy business. The increase in income from operations was partially offset by (i) labor
cost pressure from frontline employee wage adjustments, increased turnover driving up training costs and higher
overtime due to driver shortages and volume growth; (ii) inflationary cost pressures and (iii) increased
depreciation and amortization from our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and increased landfill amortization
from higher volumes and revisions in landfill estimates. During 2021, the positive earnings contributions from
Advanced Disposal were offset by elevated depreciation and amortization of acquired assets;
Net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. was $1,816 million, or $4.29 per diluted share, compared
with $1,496 million, or $3.52 per diluted share, in the prior year period. The increase in income from operations
discussed above, in addition to lower interest expense, drove an increase in net income which was partially offset
by a loss on early extinguishment of debt;
Net cash provided by operating activities was $4,338 million in 2021, compared with $3,403 million in 2020 with
the improvement driven by (i) an increase in earnings; (ii) our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (iii) lower
interest payments; (iv) lower income taxes paid in the current year and (v) favorable changes in our working
capital, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures; and
38
Free cash flow was $2,530 million in 2021, compared with $2,656 million in 2020. The decrease in free cash
flow is primarily attributable to higher proceeds from divestitures in 2020 primarily related to assets required to
be sold by the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, partially
offset by an increase in net cash provided by operating activities discussed above. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP
measure of liquidity. Refer to Free Cash Flow below for our definition of free cash flow, additional information
about our use of this measure, and a reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities, which is the most
comparable GAAP measure.
Results of Operations
Operating Revenues
Our Solid Waste operating revenues are primarily generated from fees charged for our collection, transfer, disposal,
and recycling and resource recovery services, and from sales of commodities by our recycling and landfill gas-to-energy
operations. We also provide additional services that are not managed through our Solid Waste business, including both
our Strategic Business Solutions (“WMSBS”) and Energy and Environmental Services (“EES”) businesses, recycling
brokerage services, landfill gas-to-energy services and certain other expanded service offerings and solutions. The mix of
operating revenues from our major lines of business for the year ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intercompany (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2021
4,760 $
3,172
3,210
533
11,675
4,153
2,072
1,681
2,112
(3,762)
2020
4,102
2,716
2,770
465
10,053
3,667
1,855
1,127
1,776
(3,260)
$ 17,931 $ 15,218
$
2019
4,229
2,613
2,916
482
10,240
3,846
1,820
1,040
1,758
(3,249)
$ 15,455
(a) The “Other” line of business includes (i) certain services provided by our WMSBS business; (ii) our landfill
gas - to - energy operations managed by our WM Renewable Energy business; (iii) certain services within our EES
business, including our construction and remediation services and our services associated with the disposal of fly ash
and (iv) certain other expanded service offerings and solutions. In addition, our “Other” line of business reflects the
results of non-operating entities that provide financial assurance and self-insurance support for our Solid Waste
business, net of intercompany activity. Revenue attributable to collection, landfill, transfer and recycling services
provided by our “Other” businesses has been reflected as a component of the relevant line of business for purposes of
presentation in this table.
(b) Intercompany revenues between lines of business are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements included
within this report.
39
The following table provides details associated with the period-to-period change in revenues and average yield for the
year ended December 31 (dollars in millions):
2021 vs. 2020
As a % of
Related
Amount Business(a) Amount
As a % of
Total
Company(b)
3.5 %
51.5
36.9
Collection and disposal . . . . $ 468
Recycling (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . 537
Fuel surcharges and
other (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
Total average yield (e) . .
Volume (d) . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal revenue growth .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . .
Divestitures . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency
translation . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,245
435
1,680
1,032
(49)
50
$ 2,713
8.2 %
2.8
11.0
6.8
(0.3)
0.3
17.8 %
2020 vs. 2019
As a % of
Related
As a % of
Total
Amount Business(a) Amount Company(b)
$ 299
75
2.2 %
7.6
(151)
(24.7)
$ 223
(692)
(469)
248
(8)
(8)
$ (237)
1.5 %
(4.5)
(3.0)
1.7
(0.1)
(0.1)
(1.5)%
(a) Calculated by dividing the increase or decrease for the current year by the prior year’s related business revenue
adjusted to exclude the impacts of divestitures for the current year.
(b) Calculated by dividing the increase or decrease for the current year by the prior year’s total Company revenue adjusted
to exclude the impacts of divestitures for the current year.
(c) Includes combined impact of commodity price variability and changes in fees.
(d) Beginning in 2021, includes changes in our revenue attributable to our WM Renewable Energy business from yield,
which is included in Fuel Surcharges and Other, and Volume.
(e) The amounts reported herein represent the changes in our revenue attributable to average yield for the total Company.
The following provides further details about our period-to-period change in revenues:
Average Yield
Collection and Disposal Average Yield — This measure reflects the effect on our revenue from the pricing activities
of our collection, transfer and landfill operations, exclusive of volume changes. Revenue growth from collection and
disposal average yield includes not only base rate changes and environmental and service fee fluctuations, but also
(i) certain average price changes related to the overall mix of services, which are due to the types of services provided;
(ii) changes in average price from new and lost business and (iii) price decreases to retain customers.
40
The details of our revenue growth from collection and disposal average yield for the year ended December 31 are as
follows (dollars in millions):
2021 vs. 2020
2020 vs. 2019
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total collection and disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As a % of
Related
Business
As a % of
Related
Amount Business
3.9 % $
4.8
4.5
4.2
1.8
2.9
3.5 % $
91
74
73
238
32
29
299
2.4 %
2.7
2.9
2.5
1.3
3.0
2.2 %
$
Amount
152
126
119
397
42
29
468
$
Our overall strategic pricing efforts are focused on recovering as much of the inflationary cost increases we experience
in our business as possible by increasing our average unit rate. We experienced strong average yield growth in our
collection line of business of 4.2% in 2021, up from 2.5% in 2020, showing our focus on our pricing efforts in this
inflationary environment. We are driving improvements in our residential line of business, aligning the price charged for
services we provide to our customers with the costs to provide the services, resulting in increased average yield in 2021 of
4.5%, up from 2.9% in 2020. We are also continuing to see growth in our landfill and transfer businesses with our
municipal solid waste business experiencing 3.2% average yield growth for 2021 compared to 2.3% in 2020. A significant
portion of our revenue is tied to a price escalation index with a lookback provision, which has resulted in a timing lag in
our ability to recover increased costs under those contracts during this period of rapid inflation. Separately, for many of
our customers we provide services under multi-year contracts that can restrict our ability to increase prices and the timing
of such increases. As we enter 2022, many of these contract lookback provisions will begin to capture the recent
inflationary cost increases.
Recycling — Recycling revenue increased $537 million and $75 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively, as compared
with the prior year periods primarily from higher market prices for recycling commodities. Average market prices for
recycling commodities at the Company’s facilities were approximately 115% and 19% higher in 2021 and 2020,
respectively, when compared with the prior year periods. Market prices began to increase in 2020 from the unprecedented
lows experienced in 2019, largely due to COVID-19 related decreases in the supply of recycled materials. Demand for
recycled materials strengthened in the back-half of 2020 and continued in 2021, outpacing supply, driven by the growth
in e-commerce, businesses re-opening, and manufacturers committing to use more recycled content in their packaging.
We have also maintained our focus on converting to a fee - based pricing model that ensures fees paid by customers address
the cost of processing materials and the impact on our cost structure of managing contamination in the recycling stream.
Fuel Surcharges and Other — These fees, which include our fuel surcharge program, yield from our WM Renewable
Energy business and other mandated fees, increased $240 million in 2021, as compared with 2020, and decreased
$151 million in 2020 as compared with 2019. Fuel surcharge revenues are based on and fluctuate in response to changes
in the national average prices for diesel fuel, and also vary with changes in our volume-based revenue activity. Market
prices for diesel fuel were almost 30% higher in 2021, when compared with 2020, as diesel fuel prices began to increase
towards the end of 2020 and continued to increase throughout 2021. Consistent with the general downturn in oil and gas
markets in 2020, market prices for diesel fuel were approximately 16% lower in 2020, as compared to 2019. Additionally,
we transitioned certain customers’ pricing away from a fuel surcharge in 2020, reflecting the cost of fuel in the base rates
we charge for our services, which further contributed to the decline in 2020 as compared with 2019. Revenue from our
WM Renewable Energy business increased in 2021, as compared to 2020, primarily driven by the increase in value for
renewable fuel standard credits. The other fees are primarily related to fees and taxes assessed by various state, county and
municipal government agencies at our landfills and transfer stations. These amounts have not significantly impacted the
change in revenue for the periods presented.
41
Volume
Our revenues from volume (excluding volumes from acquisitions and divestitures) increased $435 million, or 2.8%,
in 2021, as compared with 2020, and decreased $692 million, or 4.5%, in 2020, as compared with 2019.
Over the last year, our volumes have been recovering from the sharp decline experienced in April 2020 as a result of
COVID-19. The pace of recovery in our volumes accelerated in the second quarter of 2021 and continued in the back-half
of 2021 with minimal impact from the resurgence in transmission of recent COVID-19 virus variants as communities and
businesses remained open. The portions of our business that had the most pronounced decreases in volume due to the
pandemic were our industrial and commercial collection businesses and our landfill volumes. As we completed 2021,
volumes in each of these lines of business were either on par with pre-pandemic levels or have now surpassed 2019
volumes. We continue to be optimistic about volume recovery and overall economic recovery from the impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainty remains with respect to various factors that influence the pace of economic
recovery and the potential for future resurgence in transmission of COVID-19 and related business closures due to virus
variants or otherwise. Such conditions could adversely impact our volumes in the future. In addition, our WMSBS business
volume grew from our continued focus on a differentiated service model for national accounts customers.
Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions and divestitures resulted in a net increase in revenues of $983 million, or 6.5%, and $240 million, or
1.6%, in 2021 and 2020, respectively, as compared with the prior year periods, primarily due to our acquisition of
Advanced Disposal.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses are comprised of (i) labor and related benefits costs (excluding labor costs associated with
maintenance and repairs discussed below), which include salaries and wages, bonuses, related payroll taxes, insurance and
benefits costs and the costs associated with contract labor; (ii) transfer and disposal costs, which include tipping fees paid
to third-party disposal facilities and transfer stations; (iii) maintenance and repairs costs relating to equipment, vehicles
and facilities and related labor costs; (iv) subcontractor costs, which include the costs of independent haulers who transport
waste collected by us to disposal facilities and are affected by variables such as volumes, distance and fuel prices; (v) costs
of goods sold, which includes the cost to purchase recycling materials for our recycling line of business, including certain
rebates paid to suppliers; (vi) fuel costs, net of tax credits for alternative fuel, which represent the costs of fuel to operate
our truck fleet and landfill operating equipment; (vii) disposal and franchise fees and taxes, which include landfill taxes,
municipal franchise fees, host community fees, contingent landfill lease payments and royalties; (viii) landfill operating
costs, which include interest accretion on landfill liabilities, interest accretion on and discount rate adjustments to
environmental remediation liabilities and recovery assets, leachate and methane collection and treatment, landfill
remediation costs and other landfill site costs; (ix) risk management costs, which include general liability, automobile
liability and workers’ compensation claims programs costs and (x) other operating costs, which include gains and losses
on sale of assets, telecommunications, equipment and facility lease expenses, property taxes, utilities and supplies.
Variations in volumes year-over-year, as discussed above in Operating Revenues, in addition to cost inflation, affect the
comparability of the components of our operating expenses.
42
The following table summarizes the major components of our operating expenses for the year ended
December 31 (dollars in millions and as a percentage of revenues):
Labor and related benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer and disposal costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maintenance and repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subcontractor costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fuel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Disposal and franchise fees and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill operating costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
$ 3,223
1,161
1,596
1,766
936
393
698
412
344
582
$ 11,111
2020
2019
18.0 % $ 2,746 18.1 % $ 2,791 18.0 %
7.5
6.5
1,135
1,160
1,331
8.9
8.7
1,355
1,523 10.0
9.9
1,532
3.6
5.2
553
1.7
2.2
336
4.0
3.9
627
2.6
2.3
379
1.8
1.9
267
496
3.4
3.2
62.0 % $ 9,341 61.4 % $ 9,496
7.5
8.8
9.9
3.6
2.2
4.1
2.4
1.7
3.2
61.4 %
553
265
606
394
269
519
Our operating expenses for 2021 increased, as compared with 2020, primarily due to (i) increased volumes from the
acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (ii) commodity-driven business impacts, particularly from recycling brokerage rebates
and higher fuel prices; (iii) volume recovery from earlier pandemic lows; (iv) labor cost pressure from frontline employee
wage adjustments, increased turnover driving up training costs and higher overtime due to driver shortages and volume
growth and (v) inflationary cost pressures, primarily in the second half of 2021. These impacts were partially offset by our
continued focus on operating efficiency and efforts to control costs as volumes grow.
Our operating expenses for 2020 decreased, as compared with 2019, primarily due to decreases in our landfill and
industrial and commercial collection volumes and our proactive steps to manage our variable costs in response to the
volume declines resulting from COVID-19 impacts. The revenue declines due to the COVID-19 pandemic had a greater
impact on our higher margin lines of business and negatively impacted operating costs as a percentage of revenues. In
addition, our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was impacted by our acquisition of Advanced Disposal as
the acquired business’s operating cost structure was higher than ours and we incurred certain one-time, upfront costs.
Significant items affecting the comparison of operating expenses between reported periods include:
Labor and Related Benefits — The increase in labor and related benefits costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was
largely driven by (i) increased labor and related benefits costs related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (ii) merit
and proactive market wage adjustments to hire and retain talent; (iii) volume increases, particularly in our commercial and
industrial collection businesses, which when combined with driver shortages and turnover in certain markets, increased
overtime and training hours; (iv) higher annual incentive compensation and (v) increases in health and welfare costs
attributable to medical care activity generally returning to pre-pandemic levels. The decrease in labor and related benefits
costs in 2020, as compared with 2019, was largely driven by decreases in volume in our industrial and commercial
collection businesses. Our proactive steps positioned us to optimize our route structure to respond to lower industrial and
commercial collection volumes. Additionally, the decrease was attributable to (i) improved efficiency; (ii) lower
headcount due to employee attrition coupled with proactive steps to defer hiring due to COVID - 19 driven uncertainty and
(iii) lower annual incentive compensation. These decreases were offset, in part, by annual merit increases and the addition
of employees as a result of our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
Transfer and Disposal Costs — The increase in transfer and disposal costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was
largely driven by increased volume, which includes the volumes from our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and
inflationary cost increases from our third-party haulers. The decrease in transfer and disposal costs in 2020, as compared
with 2019, was largely driven by volume declines in our industrial and commercial collection businesses as a result of
COVID-19 offset, in part, by additional disposal costs attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
Maintenance and Repairs — The increase in maintenance and repairs costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was
largely driven by (i) our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, including intentional investments to bring the acquired fleet to
43
our standards; (ii) inflationary cost increases for parts, supplies and third-party services; (iii) additional fleet maintenance
driven by commercial and industrial collection volume increases; (iv) labor cost pressure from our technicians, including
higher overtime from labor shortages; (v) an increase in container repairs driven by volume increases and delays in normal
course capital expenditures for steel containers due to both steel costs and supply chain constraints and (vi) increased
building maintenance costs including improvements to facilities. The decrease in maintenance and repairs costs in 2020,
as compared with 2019, was largely driven by proactive steps to optimize routes and reduce overtime hours to address the
volume declines discussed above. Additionally, the 2019 period was also impacted by a $16 million non - cash charge to
write-off certain equipment costs related to our Other segment. This decline in costs was partially offset by intentional
investments in the acquired Advanced Disposal fleet and inflationary cost pressures for both our Company and third-party
services due to demand for skilled technician labor as well as for parts and supplies.
Subcontractor Costs — The increase in subcontractor costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was largely driven by
(i) inflationary cost increases from third-party haulers and higher volumes; (ii) an increase in volumes in our WMSBS
business, which relies more extensively on subcontracted hauling than our collection and disposal business and (iii) the
acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The decrease in subcontractor costs in 2020, as compared with 2019, was largely due
to COVID - 19 driven volume declines in our industrial collection business and projects ending or scaling down during
2020 in our EES business. The decrease was offset, in part, by an increase in business activity in our WMSBS business.
Cost of Goods Sold — The increase in cost of goods sold in 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily driven by
increases in market prices for recycling commodities of approximately 115% and to a lesser extent, higher recycling
volumes. Costs in 2020 were flat when compared with 2019 in spite of an increase in commodity prices, largely due to
lower recycling volumes as a result of COVID - 19. Additionally, a higher percentage of our overall recycled commodity
sales in 2020 were targeted at domestic markets, resulting in lower freight costs.
Fuel — The increase in fuel costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily due to (i) increases of almost 30%
in market prices for diesel fuel; (ii) the acquisition of Advanced Disposal and (iii) volume increases in our commercial
and industrial collection businesses. The decrease in fuel costs in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily due to (i) a
decline of approximately 15% in market prices for diesel fuel; (ii) lower costs resulting from the continued conversion of
our fleet to natural gas vehicles and (iii) volume declines. The decreases were offset, in part, by (i) lower federal alternative
fuel credits and (ii) additional costs attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
Disposal and Franchise Fees and Taxes — The increase in disposal and franchise fees and taxes in 2021, as compared
with 2020, was primarily driven by (i) landfill volume increases; (ii) disposal rate increases at certain landfills and
(iii) additional costs attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The decrease in disposal and franchise fees and
taxes in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily related to lower landfill volumes, largely driven by the impact of
COVID - 19. The decreases were offset, in part, by additional costs attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
Landfill Operating Costs — The increase in landfill operating costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily
due to volume increases, which includes our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and increased testing and monitoring costs.
These increases were partially offset by (i) lower leachate management costs, primarily due to the cessation of certain
transportation costs in our East Tier segment and (ii) changes in the measurement of our environmental remediation
obligations and recovery assets in 2021 and 2020. Our measurement of these balances includes application of a risk-free
discount rate, which is based on the rate for U.S. Treasury bonds. In 2021, there was an increase in the discount rate, which
resulted in a reduction in the net liability balance and a credit to expense. Conversely, in 2020, there was a decrease in the
discount rate, which resulted in an increase in the net liability balance and a charge to expense.
The increase in landfill operating costs in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily due to higher leachate
management costs compared to the prior year and additional costs attributable to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
This increase was offset, in part, by decreases attributable to lower volumes at our landfills.
Risk Management — The increase in risk management costs in 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily due to
our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and overall economic recovery, increasing business activity and claim volumes and
related costs. Risk management costs were relatively flat in 2020, as compared with 2019.
44
Other — Other operating cost increases in 2021, as compared with 2020, were due to our acquisition of Advanced
Disposal and increased equipment rental costs attributable, in part, to increased volumes and supply chain constraints
slowing normal course fleet and equipment orders. Additionally, during the second half of 2021, additional volumes and
inflationary cost pressures drove an increase in various costs. Partially offsetting these was a favorable litigation settlement
in 2021. Additionally, net gains on sales of certain assets during each year impacted the comparability of the reported
periods.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist of (i) labor and related benefits costs, which include salaries,
bonuses, related insurance and benefits, contract labor, payroll taxes and equity-based compensation; (ii) professional fees,
which include fees for consulting, legal, audit and tax services; (iii) provision for bad debts, which includes allowances
for uncollectible customer accounts and collection fees and (iv) other selling, general and administrative expenses, which
include, among other costs, facility-related expenses, voice and data telecommunication, advertising, bank charges,
computer costs, travel and entertainment, rentals, postage and printing. In addition, the financial impacts of litigation
reserves generally are included in our “Other” selling, general and administrative expenses.
The following table summarizes the major components of our selling, general and administrative expenses for the year
ended December 31 (dollars in millions and as a percentage of revenues):
2021
2020
2019
Labor and related benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,215
228
37
384
$ 1,864
6.8 % $ 1,057 6.9 % $ 1,020 6.6 %
256
1.3
54
0.2
2.1
361
10.4 % $ 1,728
183
1.7
38
0.4
2.4
390
11.4 % $ 1,631
1.2
0.3
2.5
10.6 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2021, as compared with 2020, increased primarily due to (i) higher
incentive compensation costs; (ii) strategic investments in our digital platform, including planned investments in a new
enterprise resource planning system and investments in customer service digitalization and (iii) increased labor, support
and integration costs following our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. Partially offsetting these increases are lower
consulting, advisory and legal fees from the 2020 acquisition of Advanced Disposal and improvements in our provision
for bad debts as collections returned to pre-pandemic levels. Although our costs increased, the significant revenue increase
positioned us to reduce our overall selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues when
compared with the prior year periods.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2020, as compared with 2019, increased due to (i) incremental costs
of approximately $150 million incurred in connection with the acquisition and integration of Advanced Disposal;
(ii) strategic investments in our digital platform and (iii) an increase in the provision for bad debts due to negative impacts
on customer receipts experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the cost increases, selling, general
and administrative expenses as a percent of revenue increased in 2020 due to the decline in volume-related revenues.
Significant items affecting the comparison of our selling, general and administrative expenses between reported
periods include:
Labor and Related Benefits — The increase in labor and related benefits costs for 2021, as compared with 2020, was
primarily due to (i) higher incentive compensation costs; (ii) additional headcount, including from our acquisition of
Advanced Disposal; (iii) annual merit increases for our employees; (iv) costs associated with our strategic investments in
our digital platform and (v) increases in health and welfare costs attributable to medical care activities generally returning
to pre-pandemic levels from the lower level experienced during 2020. The increase in labor and related benefits costs in
2020, as compared with 2019, was largely due to (i) costs incurred in connection with our acquisition of Advanced
Disposal, including severance costs and additional headcount; (ii) annual merit increases and (iii) costs associated with
45
our strategic investments in our digital platform. These cost increases were offset, in part, by (i) lower annual incentive
compensation costs and (ii) proactive steps undertaken to defer hiring and reduce labor related costs.
Professional Fees — Professional fees decreased for 2021, as compared with 2020, primarily due to lower consulting,
advisory and legal fees following the completion of our acquisition of Advanced Disposal in 2020, partially offset by
increased strategic investments in our digital platform and integration costs related to our acquisition of Advanced
Disposal. The increases in professional fees in 2020, as compared with 2019, were primarily driven by consulting, advisory
and legal fees incurred in connection with our acquisition and integration of Advanced Disposal and strategic investments
in our digital platform.
Provision for Bad Debts — The decrease in provision for bad debts for 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily
due to an overall improvement in customer account collections and decreased collection risk with certain customers. The
increase in the provision for bad debts in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily due to increased collection risk
associated with certain customers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Other — The increase in other expenses for 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily driven by costs associated
with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and increased technology infrastructure costs to support our strategic
investments in our digital platform. The decrease in other expenses in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily due to
lower litigation costs and proactive measures taken to reduce discretionary costs, such as travel and entertainment,
company-wide. These cost decreases were offset, in part, by increased technology infrastructure costs in 2020 to support
strategic investments in our digital platform. We also incurred one-time technology costs in 2020 to transition employees
to work-from-home in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
The following table summarizes the components of our depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended
December 31 (dollars in millions and as a percentage of revenues):
2021
2020
2019
Depreciation of tangible property and equipment. . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of landfill airspace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1,125 6.2 % $
731
143
$ 1,999
893 5.8 %
575
106
11.1 % $ 1,671 11.0 % $ 1,574
996 6.6 % $
3.7
568
0.7
107
3.7
0.7
10.2 %
4.1
0.8
The increase in depreciation of tangible property and equipment in 2021, as compared with 2020, was related to our
acquisition of Advanced Disposal and investments in capital assets, including our fleet, heavy equipment at our landfills
and containers to service our customers. The increase in amortization of landfill airspace in 2021, as compared with 2020,
was driven by (i) changes in amortization rates driven by revisions in landfill estimates, which includes changes in the
anticipated timing of capping, closure and post-closure activities; (ii) our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and (iii) landfill
volume increases from the economic recovery. Additionally, 2020 benefited from a decrease in the inflation rate used to
estimate capping, closure, and post-closure asset retirement obligations. The increase in amortization of intangible assets
in 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily driven by the amortization of acquired intangible assets related to the
acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
The increase in depreciation of tangible property and equipment in 2020, as compared with 2019, was primarily related
to (i) investments in capital assets, including our fleet and facilities and (ii) additional depreciation attributable to our
acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The decrease in amortization of landfill airspace in 2020, as compared with 2019, was
driven by (i) lower volumes at our landfills, primarily as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and (ii) a decrease in the
inflation rate used to estimate capping, closure and post-closure asset retirement obligations from 2.5% to 2.25% at
December 31, 2020. These decreases were offset, in part, by charges to reflect changes in estimated landfill construction
costs and our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
46
Our amortization of intangible assets was flat in 2020, as compared with 2019. The increased expense for intangible
assets acquired as part of the acquisition of Advanced Disposal was offset, primarily by decreases for certain customer list
assets reaching the end of their lives.
Restructuring
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized $8 million of restructuring charges primarily related to our
acquisition of Advanced Disposal. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $9 million of restructuring
charges primarily related to modifying our field sales and customer services structures to better support our investment in
customer service digitalization, which is discussed above.
(Gain) Loss from Divestitures, Asset Impairments and Unusual Items, Net
The following table summarizes the major components of (gain) loss from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual
items, net for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Gain from divestitures, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
2019
$
$
(44) $
8
20
(16) $
(33) $
68
—
35
$
—
42
—
42
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized net gains of $16 million primarily consisting of (i) a
$35 million pre-tax gain from the recognition of cumulative translation adjustments on the divestiture of certain
non - strategic Canadian operations in our East Tier segment and (ii) an $8 million gain from divestitures of certain ancillary
operations in our Other segment. These gains were partially offset by (i) a $20 million charge pertaining to reserves for
loss contingencies in our Corporate and Other segment and (ii) $8 million of asset impairment charges primarily related
to our WM Renewable Energy business within our Other segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $35 million of net charges primarily related to (i) a
$33 million net gain associated with net asset divestitures executed to address requirements of the U.S. Department of
Justice in connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, primarily within our West Tier segment; (ii) $41 million
of non-cash impairment charges primarily related to two landfills and an oil field waste injection facility in our West Tier
segment; (iii) a $20 million non-cash impairment charge in our East Tier segment due to management’s decision to close
a landfill once its constructed airspace is filled and abandon any remaining permitted airspace and (iv) $7 million of net
charges primarily related to non-cash impairments of certain assets within our WM Renewable Energy business in our
Other segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized asset impairments of $42 million, related to (i) $27 million
of goodwill impairment charges within our Other segment, of which $17 million related to our EES business, and
$10 million related to our LampTracker® reporting unit and (ii) $15 million of asset impairment charges primarily related
to certain solid waste operations in our West Tier segment.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the accounting policy and
analysis involved in identifying and calculating impairments.
47
Income from Operations
The following table summarizes income from operations for the year ended December 31 and has been updated to
reflect our realigned segments which are discussed further in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in
millions):
Period-to-
Period
Change
2021
Period-to-
Period
Change
2020(c)
2019(c)
Solid Waste:
East Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
West Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solid Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate and Other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,037
2,103
4,140
34
(1,209)
$ 2,965
$ 365
303
668
76
(213)
$ 531
16.5 %
21.8 % $ 1,672
1,800
16.8
3,472
19.2
(42)
*
21.4
(996)
21.8 % $ 2,434
$ (175)
(134)
(309)
116
(79)
(9.5)% $ 1,847
1,934
(6.9)
3,781
(8.2)
(158)
*
(917)
8.6
$ (272) (10.1)% $ 2,706
16.0 %
17.5 %
* Percentage change does not provide a meaningful comparison.
(a) “Other” includes (i) elements of our WMSBS business; (ii) elements of our landfill gas-to-energy operations managed
by our WM Renewable Energy business and not included in the operations of our reportable segments; (iii) elements
of our third-party subcontract and administration revenues managed by our EES business and not included in the
operations of our reportable segments; (iv) our recycling brokerage services and (v) certain other expanded service
offerings and solutions. In addition, our “Other” segment reflects the results of non-operating entities that provide
financial assurance and self-insurance support for our Solid Waste business, net of intercompany activity.
(b) “Corporate and Other” operating results reflect certain costs incurred for various support services that are not allocated
to our reportable segments. These support services include, among other things, treasury, legal, digital, tax, insurance,
centralized service center processes, other administrative functions and the maintenance of our closed landfills.
Income from operations for “Corporate and Other” also includes costs associated with our long-term incentive
program.
(c) In the fourth quarter of 2021, we discontinued certain allocations from our Corporate and Other segment to our Solid
Waste operating segments and Other segment. Reclassifications have been made to our prior period information for
comparability purposes.
Solid Waste — The most significant items affecting the results of operations of our Solid Waste business during the
three years ended December 31, 2021 are summarized below:
Income from operations in our Solid Waste business increased for 2021, as compared with 2020, primarily due
to (i) revenue growth in our collection and disposal businesses driven by both yield and volume, as well as the
acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (ii) improved profitability in our recycling business from higher market prices
for recycling commodities and improved costs at facilities where we have made investments in enhanced
technology and equipment and (iii) changes from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual items discussed
above in (Gain) Loss from Divestitures, Asset Impairments and Unusual Items, Net. These increases were partially
offset by (i) labor cost pressure from frontline employee wage adjustments, increased turnover driving up training
costs and higher overtime due to driver shortages and volume growth; (ii) increased landfill amortization from
higher volumes and revisions in landfill estimates, including the anticipated timing of capping, closure and post-
closure activities at certain landfills and adjustments in 2020 to the inflation rate used to estimate capping, closure,
and post-closure asset retirement obligations that benefitted costs in 2020 and (iii) inflationary cost pressures.
During 2021, the positive earnings contributions from Advanced Disposal were offset by elevated depreciation
and amortization of acquired assets.
Income from operations for 2020 decreased, as compared with 2019, for the Solid Waste business due to the
overall negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in revenue declines from lower volumes and higher
48
depreciation expense which was primarily related to investments in capital assets, including our fleet and
facilities. The declines were partially offset by (i) higher yield in our collection and disposal businesses; (ii) the
benefit of resumed fees and price increases; (iii) lower operating costs directly related to our proactive steps taken
to manage our variable costs in the lower volume environment and (iv) a net divestiture gain of $33 million
associated with the sale of net assets to GFL Environmental, primarily within our West Tier segment.
Additionally, income from operations for our West Tier segment was impacted by $41 million of non-cash asset
impairment charges primarily related to two landfills and an oil field waste injection facility. Income from
operations for our East Tier segment was impacted by a $20 million non-cash impairment charge related to
management’s decision to close a landfill once its constructed airspace is filled and abandon any remaining
permitted airspace. Furthermore, in 2019, our West Tier segment benefited from the clean-up efforts of natural
disasters primarily in California and similar efforts did not recur in 2020.
Other — The increase in income from operations for 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily driven by increased
market values for renewable energy credits generated by our WM Renewable Energy business.
Income from operations for the Other segment for 2020, as compared with 2019, was favorably impacted primarily
by (i) volume increases in our WM Renewable Energy business as a result of a new renewable energy facility coming
online; (ii) our WMSBS business as a result of newly executed national account contracts and (iii) our recycling brokerage
business.
Corporate and Other — The most significant items affecting the results of operations for Corporate and Other during
the three years ended December 31, 2021 are summarized below:
These costs increased in 2021, as compared with 2020, due to (i) higher incentive compensation costs;
(ii) increased labor, support and integration costs following our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (iii) strategic
investments in our digital platform; (iv) increased health and welfare costs attributable to medical care activity
generally returning to pre-pandemic levels from the lower levels experienced during 2020 and (v) charges
pertaining to reserves for certain loss contingencies during 2021. These increases were partially offset by lower
consulting, advisory and legal fees following the completion of our acquisition of Advanced Disposal in the fourth
quarter of 2020 and changes in the measurement of our environmental remediation obligations and recovery
assets in both 2020 and 2021.
The costs increased in 2020, as compared with 2019, due to (i) higher consulting, advisory and legal fees
associated with our acquisition and integration of Advanced Disposal; (ii) strategic investments in our digital
platform; (iii) incremental costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and (iv) higher long-term incentive
compensation costs. These increased expenses were offset, in part, by (i) lower annual incentive compensation
costs and (ii) lower litigation reserves.
Interest Expense, Net
Our interest expense, net was $365 million, $425 million and $411 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The
decrease in interest expense, net for 2021 was primarily due to certain refinancing activities, as discussed further below,
including (i) the redemption of $3.0 billion of senior notes in July 2020 and the issuance of $2.5 billion of senior notes in
November 2020 at lower rates and (ii) the retirement of $1.3 billion of certain high-coupon senior notes and concurrent
issuance of $950 million of lower coupon senior notes in May 2021. The decreases were partially offset by decreases in
interest income as a result of lower cash and cash equivalents balances in 2021. The increase in interest expense, net for
2020 was primarily attributable to decreases in interest income resulting from lower cash and cash equivalents balances,
due to the redemption of $3.0 billion of senior notes with a special mandatory redemption feature (the “SMR Notes”) in
July 2020 as discussed below in Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net. Partially offsetting the decreases in interest
income were favorable impacts due to a lower interest rate on our commercial paper borrowings as a result of the favorable
interest rate environment in 2020 compared to 2019.
49
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net
In May 2021, WMI issued $950 million of senior notes, which are discussed further below in Summary of Cash and
Cash Equivalents, Restricted Trust and Escrow Accounts and Debt Obligations. Concurrently, we used the net proceeds
from the newly issued senior notes of $942 million and available cash on hand to retire $1.3 billion of certain high-coupon
senior notes. The loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2021 includes $220 million of charges related to this tender
offer, including cash paid of $211 million related to premiums and other third - party costs, and $9 million primarily related
to unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information related to these transactions.
In July 2020, we recognized a $52 million loss on early extinguishment of debt in our Consolidated Statement of
Operations related to the mandatory redemption of the SMR Notes. The loss includes $30 million of premiums paid and
$22 million of unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs. Pursuant to the terms of the SMR Notes, we were required
to redeem all of such outstanding notes paying debt holders 101% of the aggregate principal amounts of such notes, plus
accrued but unpaid interest, as a result of the Advanced Disposal acquisition not being completed by July 14, 2020.
Accordingly, the redemption was completed on July 20, 2020 using available cash on hand and, to a lesser extent,
commercial paper borrowings. The cash paid included the $3.0 billion principal amount of debt redeemed, $30 million of
related premiums and $8 million of accrued interest.
During the fourth quarter of 2020, we repaid the outstanding borrowings under our 364-day revolving credit facility
and contemporaneously terminated the facility, at which time we recognized a $2 million loss on early extinguishment of
debt in our Consolidated Statement of Operations related to unamortized debt issuance costs.
At the time of acquisition, Advanced Disposal had outstanding $425 million of 5.625% senior notes due
November 2024. In November 2020, we redeemed the notes pursuant to an optional redemption feature upon which we
recognized a $1 million gain on early extinguishment of debt in our Consolidated Statement of Operations due to the
difference in carrying value and redemption price.
In May 2019, WMI issued $4.0 billion of senior notes, including $3.0 billion of SMR Notes. We used $344 million
of the proceeds from this offering to retire $257 million principal amount of certain high-coupon senior notes. The cash
paid to retire the high-coupon senior notes also included $84 million of related premiums, which are classified as loss on
early extinguishment of debt in our Consolidated Statement of Operations, and $3 million of accrued interest.
In the third quarter of 2019, we elected to refund and reissue $99 million of tax-exempt bonds, which resulted in the
recognition of a $1 million loss on early extinguishment of debt in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Equity in Net Losses of Unconsolidated Entities
We recognized equity in net losses of unconsolidated entities of $36 million, $68 million and $55 million in 2021,
2020 and 2019, respectively. The losses for each period were primarily related to our noncontrolling interests in entities
established to invest in and manage low-income housing properties. We generate tax benefits, including tax credits, from
the losses incurred from these investments, which are discussed further in Notes 8 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. In 2020, the entity that held and managed our ownership interest in the refined coal facility sold a majority of
its assets resulting in a $7 million non-cash impairment charge at that time. Additionally, the 2019 period includes losses
associated with our investment in a refined coal facility.
Other, Net
We recognized other, net income of $5 million in 2021 and 2020, compared to other, net expense of $50 million in
2019. In 2019, we recognized a $52 million non-cash impairment charge related to our minority-owned investment in a
waste conversion technology business. We wrote down our investment to its estimated fair value as the result of recent
third-party investor’s transactions in these securities. The fair value of our investment was not readily determinable; thus,
we determined the fair value utilizing a combination of quoted price inputs for the equity in our investment (Level 2) and
certain management assumptions pertaining to investment value (Level 3).
50
Income Tax Expense
We recorded income tax expense of $532 million, $397 million and $434 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019,
respectively, resulting in effective income tax rates of 22.6%, 20.9% and 20.6% for the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020 and 2019, respectively. The comparability of our income tax expense for the reported periods has been primarily
affected by the following:
Investments Qualifying for Federal Tax Credits — Our low-income housing properties and refined coal facility
investments reduced our income tax expense by $74 million, $87 million and $96 million, primarily due to tax
credits realized from these investments for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See
Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these unconsolidated
variable interest entities;
Other Federal Tax Credits — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized federal tax credits in addition to the
tax credits realized from our investments in low-income housing properties and the refined coal facility, resulting
in a reduction in our income tax expense of $5 million, $7 million and $11 million, respectively;
Equity-Based Compensation — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized excess tax benefits related to the
vesting or exercise of equity-based compensation awards resulting in a reduction in our income tax expense of
$18 million, $27 million and $25 million, respectively;
State Net Operating Losses and Credits — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized state net operating losses
and credits resulting in a reduction in our income tax expense of $15 million, $12 million and $14 million,
respectively;
Tax Audit Settlements — We file income tax returns in the U.S. and Canada, as well as other state and local
jurisdictions. We are currently under audit by various taxing authorities and our audits are in various stages of
completion. During the reported periods, we settled various tax audits, which resulted in a reduction in our income
tax expense of $13 million, $10 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019,
respectively;
Adjustments to Accruals and Related Deferred Taxes — Adjustments to our accruals and related deferred taxes
primarily due to the filing of our income tax returns, analysis of our deferred tax balances and uncertain tax
positions, and changes in state and foreign laws resulted in an increase in our income tax expense of $17 million
for the year ended December 31, 2021, and a reduction in our income tax expense of $3 million and $22 million
for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively;
Tax Implications of Divestitures – During 2021, we recognized a pre-tax gain from the recognition of cumulative
translation adjustments on the divestiture of certain non-strategic Canadian operations. This gain was not taxable,
which resulted in a reduction in our income tax expense of $8 million;
Non-Deductible Transaction Costs — During 2020 and 2019, we recognized the detrimental tax impact of
$27 million and $10 million, respectively, of non-deductible transaction costs related to our acquisition of
Advanced Disposal. The tax rules require the capitalization of certain facilitative costs on the acquisition of stock
of a company resulting in the applicable costs not being deductible for tax purposes; and
Tax Implications of Impairments — Portions of the impairment charges recognized during 2019 were not
deductible for tax purposes resulting in an increase in income tax expense of $15 million. The non-cash
impairment charges recognized during 2021 and 2020 were deductible for tax purposes. See Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to our impairment charges.
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to income taxes.
51
Landfill and Environmental Remediation Discussion and Analysis
We owned or operated 255 solid waste landfills and five secure hazardous waste landfills as of December 31, 2021
and 263 solid waste landfills and five secure hazardous waste landfills as of December 31, 2020. For these landfills, the
following table reflects changes in capacity, as measured in tons of waste, for the year ended December 31 and remaining
airspace, measured in cubic yards of waste, as of December 31 (in millions):
2021
2020
Balance as of beginning of year (in tons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions, divestitures, newly permitted landfills and
closures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in expansions pursued (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expansion permits granted (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortizable tons received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in engineering estimates and other (c) . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of end of year (in tons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of end of year (in cubic yards) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remaining
Permitted Expansion
Capacity
4,891
191
Remaining
Permitted Expansion
Total
Total
Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity
4,954
4,754
5,082
200
(4)
—
126
(124)
—
4,889
4,808
—
105
(126)
(4)
105
—
— (124)
4
4
5,063
174
4,971
163
259
—
44
(112)
(54)
4,891
4,828
273
14
21
21
(44)
—
— (112)
(54)
—
5,082
191
4,991
163
(a) Amounts reflected here relate to the combined impacts of (i) new expansions pursued; (ii) increases or decreases in
the airspace being pursued for ongoing expansion efforts; (iii) adjustments for differences between the airspace being
pursued and airspace granted and (iv) decreases due to decisions to no longer pursue expansion permits, if any.
(b) We received expansion permits at seven of our landfills during 2021 and four of our landfills during 2020,
demonstrating our continued success in working with municipalities and regulatory agencies to expand the disposal
airspace of our existing landfills.
(c) Changes in engineering estimates can result in changes to the estimated available remaining airspace of a landfill or
changes in the utilization of such landfill airspace, affecting the number of tons that can be placed in the future.
Estimates of the amount of waste that can be placed in the future are reviewed annually by our engineers and are based
on a number of factors, including standard engineering techniques and site-specific factors such as current and
projected mix of waste type; initial and projected waste density; estimated number of years of life remaining; depth
of underlying waste; anticipated access to moisture through precipitation or recirculation of landfill leachate and
operating practices. We continually focus on improving the utilization of airspace through efforts that may include
recirculating landfill leachate where allowed by permit; optimizing the placement of daily cover materials and
increasing initial compaction through improved landfill equipment, operations and training.
The tons received at our landfills for the year ended December 31 are shown below (tons in thousands):
Solid waste landfills (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hazardous waste landfills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
# of
Sites
2021
Total
Tons
255 (b) 124,773
610
125,383
5
260
2020
Tons per # of Total
Sites Tons
Day
457 263 112,729
676
5
459 268 113,405
2
Tons per
Day
413
2
415
Solid waste landfills closed, divested or lease or other
contractual agreement expired during related year . . . . . .
9
114
125,497 (c)
5
318
113,723 (c)
(a) As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had 14 landfills and 17 landfills, respectively, which were not accepting
waste.
52
(b) In 2021, we (i) executed one new contractual agreement; (ii) divested one landfill; (iii) divested one service
agreement; (iv) closed six landfills and (v) closed one landfill operated under contractual agreement.
(c) These amounts include 1.6 million tons and 1.7 million tons as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, that
were received at our landfills but were not amortized as they were used for beneficial purposes and generally were
redirected from the permitted airspace to other areas of the landfill. Waste types that are frequently identified for
beneficial use include green waste for composting and clean dirt for on-site construction projects.
As of December 31, 2021, we owned or controlled the management of 230 sites with remedial activities, are in closure
or have received a certification of closure from the applicable regulatory agency.
Based on remaining permitted airspace as of December 31, 2021 and projected annual disposal volume, the weighted
average remaining landfill life for all of our owned or operated landfills is approximately 38 years. Many of our landfills
have the potential for expanded airspace beyond what is currently permitted. We monitor the availability of permitted
airspace at each of our landfills and evaluate whether to pursue an expansion at a given landfill based on estimated future
disposal volume, disposal prices, construction and operating costs, remaining airspace and likelihood of obtaining an
expansion permit. We are seeking expansion permits at 15 of our landfills that meet the expansion criteria outlined in the
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions — Landfills section below. Although no assurances can be made that all
future expansions will be permitted or permitted as designed, the weighted average remaining landfill life for all owned or
operated landfills is approximately 39 years when considering remaining permitted airspace, expansion airspace and
projected annual disposal volume.
The number of landfills owned or operated as of December 31, 2021, segregated by their estimated operating lives
based on remaining permitted and expansion airspace and projected annual disposal volume, was as follows:
0 to 5 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 to 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11 to 20 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21 to 40 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
41+ years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
# of Landfills
28
21
50
61
100
260 (a)
(a) Of the 260 landfills, 219 are owned, 29 are operated under lease agreements and 12 are operated under other
contractual agreements. For the landfills not owned, we are usually responsible for final capping, closure and
post - closure obligations.
Landfill Assets — We capitalize various costs that we incur to prepare a landfill to accept waste. These costs generally
include expenditures for land (including the landfill footprint and required landfill buffer property), permitting, excavation,
liner material and installation, landfill leachate collection systems, landfill gas collection systems, environmental
monitoring equipment for groundwater and landfill gas, directly related engineering, capitalized interest, and on-site road
construction and other capital infrastructure costs. The cost basis of our landfill assets also includes estimates of future
costs associated with landfill final capping, closure and post-closure activities, which are discussed further below.
53
The changes to the cost basis of our landfill assets and accumulated landfill airspace amortization for the year ended
December 31, 2021 are reflected in the table below (in millions):
Cost Basis of
Accumulated
Landfill Airspace
Net Book
Value of
Landfill Assets Amortization
December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations incurred and capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of landfill airspace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirements and other adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
16,842
791
117
—
8
(24)
17,734
$
$
(9,692) $
—
—
(731)
(3)
36
(10,390) $
Landfill Assets
7,150
791
117
(731)
5
12
7,344
As of December 31, 2021, we estimate that we will spend approximately $639 million in 2022, and approximately
$1.4 billion in 2023 and 2024 combined, for the construction and development of our landfill assets. The specific timing
of landfill capital spending is dependent on future events and spending estimates are subject to change due to fluctuations
in landfill waste volumes, changes in environmental requirements and other factors impacting landfill operations.
As of December 31, 2021, we had 14 landfills which were not accepting waste. During the year ended
December 31, 2021, we performed tests of recoverability for five of these landfills with an aggregate net recorded
capitalized landfill asset cost of $297 million, for which the undiscounted expected future cash flows resulting from our
probability-weighted estimation approach exceeded the carrying values. We did not perform recoverability tests for the
remaining nine landfills as the net recorded capitalized landfill asset cost was not material.
Landfill and Environmental Remediation Liabilities — As we accept waste at our landfills, we incur significant asset
retirement obligations, which include liabilities associated with landfill final capping, closure and post-closure activities.
These liabilities are accounted for in accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for asset retirement obligations
and are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We also have liabilities for the remediation of
properties that have incurred environmental damage, which generally was caused by operations or for damage caused by
conditions that existed before we acquired operations or a site. We recognize environmental remediation liabilities when
we determine that the liability is probable and the estimated cost for the likely remedy can be reasonably estimated.
The changes to landfill and environmental remediation liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2021 are reflected
in the table below (in millions):
December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations incurred and capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions in estimates and interest rate assumptions (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions, divestitures and other adjustments (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Landfill
Environmental
Remediation
230
—
(22)
3
2
—
213
2,156 $
117
(101)
108
33
13
2,326 $
(a) The amount reported for our landfill liabilities includes an increase of $15 million due to a business decision to
accelerate the closure timing of a landfill in our West Tier segment, which resulted in the acceleration of the expected
timing of capping, closure and post-closure activities. The remaining increase relates to revisions in estimated costs
and timing of capping, closure and post-closure liabilities.
(b) The amount reported for our landfill liabilities includes an increase of $13 million related to changes in the fair values
assigned to certain acquired Advanced Disposal sites.
54
Landfill Operating Costs — The following table summarizes our landfill operating costs for the year ended
December 31 (in millions):
Interest accretion on landfill liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest accretion on and discount rate adjustments to environmental remediation
liabilities and recovery assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leachate and methane collection and treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill remediation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other landfill site costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total landfill operating costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
2019
$
108 $
103
$
98
(2)
183
6
117
412 $
9
189
1
92
394
$
13
173
4
91
379
$
Amortization of Landfill Airspace — Amortization of landfill airspace, which is included as a component of
depreciation and amortization expenses, includes the following:
the amortization of landfill capital costs, including (i) costs that have been incurred and capitalized and
(ii) estimated future costs for landfill development and construction required to develop our landfills to their
remaining permitted and expansion airspace; and
the amortization of asset retirement costs arising from landfill final capping, closure and post-closure obligations,
including (i) costs that have been incurred and capitalized and (ii) projected asset retirement costs.
Amortization expense is recorded on a units-of-consumption basis, applying cost as a rate per ton. The rate per ton is
calculated by dividing each component of the amortizable basis of a landfill (net of accumulated amortization) by the
number of tons needed to fill the corresponding asset’s remaining permitted and expansion airspace. Landfill capital costs
and closure and post-closure asset retirement costs are generally incurred to support the operation of the landfill over its
entire operating life and are, therefore, amortized on a per-ton basis using a landfill’s total permitted and expansion
airspace. Final capping asset retirement costs are related to a specific final capping event and are, therefore, amortized on
a per-ton basis using each discrete final capping event’s estimated permitted and expansion airspace. Accordingly, each
landfill has multiple per-ton amortization rates.
The following table presents our landfill airspace amortization expense on a per-ton basis for the year ended
December 31:
Amortization of landfill airspace (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tons received, net of redirected waste (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average landfill airspace amortization expense per ton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
2019
$
$
731
124
5.90
$
$
568
112
5.07
$
$
575
121
4.75
Different per-ton amortization rates are applied at each of our 260 landfills, and per-ton amortization rates vary
significantly from one landfill to another due to (i) inconsistencies that often exist in construction costs and provincial,
state and local regulatory requirements for landfill development and landfill final capping, closure and post-closure
activities and (ii) differences in the cost basis of landfills that we develop versus those that we acquire. Accordingly, our
landfill airspace amortization expense measured on a per-ton basis can fluctuate due to changes in the mix of volumes we
receive across the Company each year.
55
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company consistently generates cash flow from operations that meets and exceeds our working capital needs,
payment of our dividends, investment in the business through capital expenditures and tuck-in acquisitions, and funding
of strategic growth and sustainability investments. We continually monitor our actual and forecasted cash flows, our
liquidity and our capital resources, enabling us to plan for our present needs and fund unbudgeted business requirements
that may arise during the year. The Company believes that its investment grade credit ratings, large value of unencumbered
assets and modest leverage enable it to obtain adequate financing to meet its ongoing capital, operating, strategic and other
liquidity requirements.
Summary of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021 and the anticipated
effect of these obligations on our liquidity in future years (in millions):
2022
2023
2024 2025
2026
Thereafter Total
Recorded Obligations:
Final capping, closure and post-closure liabilities (a) . . . . .
Debt payments (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecorded Obligations:
Interest on debt (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated unconditional purchase obligations (d) . . . . . . . .
Anticipated liquidity impact as of December 31, 2021 . . .
$
137 $
2,449
171 $ 165 $
651
249
188 $ 133 $ 2,477 $ 3,271
13,579
677
8,275
1,278
323
197
3,697
266
1,077
105
$ 3,106 $ 1,294 $ 822 $ 1,837 $ 1,152 $ 13,413 $ 21,624
247
95
2,293
368
278
130
290
182
(a) Includes liabilities for final capping, closure and post-closure costs recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2021, without the impact of discounting and inflation. Our recorded liabilities for final capping, closure
and post-closure costs will increase as we continue to place additional tons within the permitted airspace at our
landfills.
(b) These amounts represent the scheduled principal payments based on their contractual maturities related to our
long - term debt and financing leases, excluding interest. Refer to Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding our debt obligations.
(c) Interest on our fixed-rate debt was calculated based on contractual rates and interest on our variable-rate debt was
calculated based on interest rates as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, we had $58 million of accrued
interest related to our debt obligations.
(d) Our unrecorded obligations represent purchase commitments from which we expect to realize an economic benefit in
future periods. We have also made certain guarantees that we do not expect to materially affect our current or future
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
discussion of the nature and terms of our unconditional purchase obligations and guarantees.
In addition to the above, we also have recorded obligations related to liabilities associated with environmental
remediation costs and non-cancelable operating lease obligations, which are discussed further in Notes 3 and 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.
56
Summary of Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Trust and Escrow Accounts and Debt Obligations
The following is a summary of our cash and cash equivalents, restricted trust and escrow accounts and debt balances
as of December 31 (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted trust and escrow accounts:
Insurance reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Final capping, closure, post-closure and environmental remediation funds . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total restricted trust and escrow accounts (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt:
Current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
118 $
305 $
118
5
428 $
553
306
114
2
422
708 $
12,697
13,405 $
551
13,259
13,810
$
$
$
$
$
(a) As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, $80 million and $75 million, respectively, of these account balances was included
in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash and cash equivalents — The decrease in cash and cash equivalents during 2021 is primarily due to the use of
available cash to retire certain high-coupon senior notes in May 2021, which is discussed above in Loss on Early
Extinguishment of Debt, Net.
Debt — We use long-term borrowings in addition to the cash we generate from operations as part of our overall
financial strategy to support and grow our business. We primarily use senior notes and tax-exempt bonds to borrow on a
long-term basis, but we also use other instruments and facilities, when appropriate. The components of our borrowings as
of December 31, 2021 are described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $3.1 billion of debt maturing within the next 12 months, including (i) $1.8 billion
of short-term borrowings under our commercial paper program (net of related discount on issuance); (ii) $645 million of
tax-exempt bonds with term interest rate periods that expire within the next 12 months, which is prior to their scheduled
maturities; (iii) $500 million of 2.90% senior notes that mature in September 2022 and (iv) $170 million of other debt with
scheduled maturities within the next 12 months, including $71 million of tax-exempt bonds. As of December 31, 2021,
we have classified $2.4 billion of debt maturing in the next 12 months as long term because we have the intent and ability
to refinance these borrowings on a long-term basis as supported by the forecasted available capacity under our $3.5 billion
long-term U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facility (“$3.5 billion revolving credit facility”). The remaining $708 million
of debt maturing in the next 12 months is classified as current obligations.
As of December 31, 2021, we also had $54 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds with long-term scheduled
maturities supported by letters of credit under our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility. The interest rates on our variable
rate tax-exempt bonds are reset on a weekly basis through a remarketing process. All recent tax - exempt bond remarketings
have successfully placed Company bonds with investors at market-driven rates and we currently expect future
remarketings to be successful. However, if the remarketing agent is unable to remarket our bonds, the remarketing agent
can put the bonds to us. In the event of a failed remarketing, we have the availability under our $3.5 billion revolving
credit facility to fund these bonds until they are remarketed successfully. Accordingly, we have classified the $54 million
of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds with maturities of more than one year as long-term in our Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of December 31, 2021.
57
In May 2021, WMI issued $950 million of senior notes consisting of $475 million of 2.00% senior notes due
June 1, 2029 and $475 million of 2.95% senior notes due June 15, 2041. The net proceeds from these debt issuances were
$942 million, all of which were used along with available cash on hand, to retire $1.3 billion of certain high-coupon senior
notes. The cash paid included the principal amount of the debt retired, $211 million of related premiums and other
third - party costs, which are classified as loss on early extinguishment of debt in our Consolidated Statement of Operations,
and $15 million of accrued interest. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to
the debt transactions.
We have credit lines in place to support our liquidity and financial assurance needs. The following table summarizes
our outstanding letters of credit, categorized by type of facility as of December 31 (in millions):
Revolving credit facility (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other letter of credit lines (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
$
$
167 $
764
931 $
270
566
836
(a) As of December 31, 2021, we had an unused and available credit capacity of $1.5 billion.
(b) As of December 31, 2021, these other letter of credit lines are uncommitted with terms extending through April 2023.
Guarantor Financial Information
WM Holdings has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of WMI’s senior indebtedness. WMI has fully and
unconditionally guaranteed all of WM Holdings’ senior indebtedness. None of WMI’s other subsidiaries have guaranteed
any of WMI’s or WM Holdings’ debt. In lieu of providing separate financial statements for the subsidiary issuer and
guarantor (WMI and WM Holdings), we have presented the accompanying supplemental summarized combined balance
sheet and income statement information for WMI and WM Holdings on a combined basis after elimination of
intercompany transactions between WMI and WM Holdings and amounts related to investments in any subsidiary that is
a non-guarantor (in millions):
December 31,
2021
Balance Sheet Information:
Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent liabilities:
6
13
590
Advances due to affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18,033
10,778
Income Statement Information:
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
343
Year Ended
December 31, 2021
58
Summary of Cash Flow Activity
The following is a summary of our cash flows for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
4,338 $
2020
$
3,403
$ (1,894) $ (4,847)
$ (2,900) $ (1,559)
2019
$
3,874
$ (2,376)
1,964
$
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Our operating cash flows for 2021, as compared with 2020, increased
by $935 million primarily as a result of (i) an increase in earnings primarily attributable to our collection, disposal and
recycling lines of business; (ii) our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (iii) lower interest payments in 2021 primarily due
to certain refinancing activities and the retirement of high-coupon debt during 2020 reducing our overall interest rates;
(iv) lower income taxes paid in 2021 and (v) favorable changes in our working capital, net of effects of acquisitions and
divestitures. Our working capital was favorably impacted by process improvements that contributed to a significant
improvement in our days-to-collect metrics. These favorable impacts were partially offset by the timing of cash tax benefits
received in 2020 associated with federal alternative fuel tax credits.
Our operating cash flows for 2020, as compared with 2019, decreased by $471 million as a result of (i) higher income
tax payments related to a taxable gain on the sale of Advanced Disposal assets to GFL Environmental; (ii) increased
interest payments and integration related spending due to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (iii) payments associated
with investments we made in our digital platform and (iv) to a lesser extent, lower earnings on our traditional Solid Waste
business primarily caused by the impact of the COVID - 19 pandemic. These results were partially offset by cash benefits
in 2020 associated with the 2019 federal alternative fuel credits.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities — The most significant items affecting the comparison of our investing cash
flows for the periods presented are summarized below:
Acquisitions — Our spending on acquisitions was $76 million, $4,088 million and $527 million in 2021, 2020
and 2019, respectively, of which $75 million, $4,085 million and $521 million, respectively, are considered cash
used in investing activities. The remaining spend is financing or operating activities related to the timing of
contingent consideration paid. Substantially all of these acquisitions are related to our Solid Waste business. Our
acquisition spending in 2020 and 2019 is primarily attributable to Advanced Disposal and Petro Waste
Environmental LP, respectively. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
We continue to focus on accretive acquisitions and growth opportunities that will enhance and expand our existing
service offerings.
Capital Expenditures — We used $1,904 million, $1,632 million and $1,818 million for capital expenditures in
2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The increase in 2021 is due in part to intentional steps the Company took to
accelerate growth capital spending on recycling and renewable energy projects. Additionally, in 2020 we took
proactive steps to reduce the amount of capital spending required due to the decrease in volumes as a result of
COVID-19. The Company continues to maintain a disciplined focus on capital management to prioritize
investments in the long-term growth of our business and for the replacement of aging assets.
Proceeds from Divestitures — Proceeds from divestitures of businesses and other assets, net of cash divested,
were $96 million, $885 million and $49 million in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In 2021, our proceeds are
primarily the result of the sale of certain non-strategic Canadian operations. In 2020, our proceeds included
$856 million related to the sale of assets required to be sold by the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with
our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The remaining amounts in 2021, 2020 and 2019 generally related to the
sale of fixed assets.
Other, Net — Our spending within other, net was $11 million, $15 million, and $86 million in 2021, 2020 and
2019, respectively. During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we used $32 million, $14 million and $44 million, respectively,
of cash from restricted cash and cash equivalents to invest in available-for-sale securities. Our 2021 cash spend
was partially offset by proceeds received from the sale of an equity method investment. We also used $20 million
in 2019 to make an initial cash payment associated with a low - income housing investment. In 2019, these items
59
were partially offset by cash proceeds from the redemption of our preferred stock received in conjunction with
the 2014 sale of our Puerto Rico operations.
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities — The most significant items affecting the comparison of our
financing cash flows for the periods presented are summarized below:
Debt (Repayments) Borrowings — The following summarizes our cash borrowings and repayments of debt for
the year ended December 31 (in millions):
2021
2020
2019
Borrowings:
Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial paper program (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
364-day revolving credit facility (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canadian senior notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayments:
Revolving credit facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial paper program (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
364-day revolving credit facility (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Senior notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advanced Disposal senior notes (c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax-exempt bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $
6,831
—
942
—
175
—
7,948
$
50 $
3,630
3,000
2,479
—
261
—
9,420 $
—
8,554
—
3,971
373
339
—
13,237
$
$
— $
(50) $
(6,872)
—
(1,289)
—
(127)
(116)
(1,822)
(3,000)
(4,000)
(437)
(212)
(108)
(11)
(9,555)
—
(257)
—
(204)
(61)
(10,088)
3,149
Net cash (repayments) borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (8,404) $ (9,629) $
(209) $
$
(456) $
(a) Beginning in 2021, we elected to report these cash flows on a gross basis. Reclassifications have been made
to our prior period information for comparability purposes. Borrowings incurred in 2020 were used for the
redemption of the SMR Notes and to partially fund our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. Borrowings
incurred in 2021 and 2019 were primarily to support acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
(b) In November 2020, we terminated this facility contemporaneously with repayment of all outstanding
borrowings with proceeds from our November 2020 senior notes issuance.
(c) At the time of acquisition, Advanced Disposal had certain outstanding senior notes which were redeemed in
2020 pursuant to an optional redemption feature as further discussed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Refer to Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to our debt borrowings
and repayments.
Premiums and Other Paid on Early Extinguishment of Debt — During 2021, we paid premiums and other
third - party costs of $211 million to retire certain high-coupon notes as discussed further in Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. During 2020, we paid premiums of $30 million to redeem $3.0 billion of
senior notes that contained a special mandatory redemption feature tied to the timing of the Advanced Disposal
acquisition closing. During 2019, we paid premiums of $84 million to retire certain high-coupon senior notes.
See Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net for further discussion.
Common Stock Repurchase Program — For the periods presented, all share repurchases have been made in
accordance with financial plans approved by our Board of Directors. We allocated $1,350 million, $402 million
and $244 million of available cash to common stock repurchases during 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. See
Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
60
We announced in December 2021 that the Board of Directors has authorized up to $1.5 billion in future share
repurchases. Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on
factors similar to those considered by the Board of Directors in making dividend declarations and listed below,
as well as market conditions.
Cash Dividends — For the periods presented, all dividends have been declared by our Board of Directors. Cash
dividends declared and paid were $970 million in 2021, or $2.30 per common share, $927 million in 2020, or
$2.18 per common share, and $876 million in 2019, or $2.05 per common share.
In December 2021, we announced that our Board of Directors expects to increase the quarterly dividend from
$0.575 to $0.65 per share for dividends declared in 2022. However, all future dividend declarations are at the
discretion of the Board of Directors and depend on various factors, including our net earnings, financial condition,
cash required for future business plans, growth and acquisitions and other factors the Board of Directors may
deem relevant.
Exercise of Common Stock Options — The exercise of common stock options generated financing cash inflows
of $66 million, $63 million and $67 million during 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Free Cash Flow
We are presenting free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure of liquidity, in our disclosures because we use this
measure in the evaluation and management of our business. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating
activities, less capital expenditures, plus proceeds from divestitures of businesses and other assets, net of cash divested.
We believe it is indicative of our ability to pay our quarterly dividends, repurchase common stock, fund acquisitions and
other investments and, in the absence of refinancings, to repay our debt obligations. Free cash flow is not intended to
replace net cash provided by operating activities, which is the most comparable GAAP measure. We believe free cash
flow gives investors useful insight into how we view our liquidity, but the use of free cash flow as a liquidity measure has
material limitations because it excludes certain expenditures that are required or that we have committed to, such as
declared dividend payments and debt service requirements.
Our calculation of free cash flow and reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities is shown in the table
below for the year ended December 31 (in millions), and may not be calculated the same as similarly-titled measures
presented by other companies:
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from divestitures of businesses and other assets, net of cash divested .
Free cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
4,338 $
(1,904)
96
2,530 $
2020
3,403
(1,632)
885
2,656
$
$
2019
3,874
(1,818)
49
2,105
$
$
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing our financial statements, we make numerous estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for
and recognition and disclosure of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses. We must make these estimates and
assumptions because certain information that we use is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with precision
from available data or simply cannot be calculated. In some cases, these estimates are difficult to determine, and we must
exercise significant judgment. In preparing our financial statements, the most difficult, subjective and complex estimates
and the assumptions that present the greatest amount of uncertainty relate to our accounting for landfills, environmental
remediation liabilities, long-lived assets and intangible asset impairments and the fair value of assets and liabilities
acquired in business combinations. Each of these items is discussed in additional detail below and in Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates and assumptions that we use
in the preparation of our financial statements.
61
Landfills
Accounting for landfills requires that significant estimates and assumptions be made regarding (i) the cost to construct
and develop each landfill asset; (ii) the estimated fair value of final capping, closure and post-closure asset retirement
obligations, which must consider both the expected cost and timing of these activities and (iii) the determination of each
landfill’s remaining permitted and expansion airspace.
Landfill Costs — We estimate the total cost to develop each of our landfill sites to its remaining permitted and
expansion airspace. This estimate includes such costs as landfill liner material and installation, excavation for airspace,
landfill leachate collection systems, landfill gas collection systems, environmental monitoring equipment for groundwater
and landfill gas, directly related engineering, capitalized interest, on-site road construction and other capital infrastructure
costs. Additionally, landfill development includes all land purchases for the landfill footprint and landfill buffer property.
The projection of these landfill costs is dependent, in part, on future events. The remaining amortizable basis of each
landfill includes costs to develop a site to its remaining permitted and expansion airspace and includes amounts previously
expended and capitalized, net of accumulated airspace amortization, and projections of future purchase and development
costs.
Final Capping Costs — We estimate the cost for each final capping event based on the area to be capped and the
capping materials and activities required. The estimates also consider when these costs are anticipated to be paid and factor
in inflation and discount rates. Our engineering personnel allocate landfill final capping costs to specific final capping
events and the capping costs are amortized as waste is disposed of at the landfill. We review these costs annually, or more
often if significant facts change. Changes in estimates, such as timing or cost of construction, for final capping events
immediately impact the required liability and the corresponding asset. When the change in estimate relates to a fully
consumed landfill, the adjustment to the asset must be amortized immediately through expense. When the change in
estimate relates to a final capping event at a landfill with remaining airspace, the adjustment to the asset is recognized in
income prospectively as a component of landfill airspace amortization.
Closure and Post-Closure Costs — We base our estimates for closure and post-closure costs on our interpretations of
permit and regulatory requirements for closure and post-closure monitoring and maintenance. The estimates for landfill
closure and post-closure costs also consider when the costs are anticipated to be paid and factor in inflation and discount
rates. The possibility of changing legal and regulatory requirements and the forward-looking nature of these types of costs
make any estimation or assumption less certain. Changes in estimates for closure and post-closure events immediately
impact the required liability and the corresponding asset. When the change in estimate relates to a fully consumed landfill,
the adjustment to the asset must be amortized immediately through expense. When the change in estimate relates to a
landfill with remaining airspace, the adjustment to the asset is recognized in income prospectively as a component of
landfill airspace amortization.
Remaining Permitted Airspace — Our engineers, in consultation with third-party engineering consultants and
surveyors, are responsible for determining remaining permitted airspace at our landfills. The remaining permitted airspace
is determined by an annual survey, which is used to compare the existing landfill topography to the expected final landfill
topography.
Expansion Airspace — We also include currently unpermitted expansion airspace in our estimate of remaining
permitted and expansion airspace in certain circumstances. First, to include airspace associated with an expansion effort,
we must generally expect the initial expansion permit application to be submitted within one year and the final expansion
permit to be received within five years. Second, we must believe that obtaining the expansion permit is likely, considering
the following criteria:
Personnel are actively working on the expansion of an existing landfill, including efforts to obtain land use and
local, state or provincial approvals;
We have a legal right to use or obtain land to be included in the expansion plan;
62
There are no significant known technical, legal, community, business, or political restrictions or similar issues
that could negatively affect the success of such expansion; and
Financial analysis has been completed based on conceptual design, and the results demonstrate that the expansion
meets Company criteria for investment.
For unpermitted airspace to be initially included in our estimate of remaining permitted and expansion airspace, the
expansion effort must meet all the criteria listed above. These criteria are evaluated by our field-based engineers,
accountants, managers and others to identify potential obstacles to obtaining the permits. Once the unpermitted airspace
is included, our policy provides that airspace may continue to be included in remaining permitted and expansion airspace
even if certain of these criteria are no longer met as long as we continue to believe we will ultimately obtain the permit,
based on the facts and circumstances of a specific landfill. In these circumstances, continued inclusion must be approved
through a landfill-specific review process that includes approval by our Chief Financial Officer on a quarterly basis.
When we include the expansion airspace in our calculations of remaining permitted and expansion airspace, we also
include the projected costs for development, as well as the projected asset retirement costs related to final capping, closure
and post-closure of the expansion in the amortization basis of the landfill.
Once the remaining permitted and expansion airspace is determined in cubic yards, an airspace utilization factor
(“AUF”) is established to calculate the remaining permitted and expansion capacity in tons. The AUF is established using
the measured density obtained from previous annual surveys and is then adjusted to account for future settlement. The
amount of settlement that is forecasted will take into account several site-specific factors including current and projected
mix of waste type, initial and projected waste density, estimated number of years of life remaining, depth of underlying
waste, anticipated access to moisture through precipitation or recirculation of landfill leachate and operating practices. In
addition, the initial selection of the AUF is subject to a subsequent multi-level review by our engineering group and the
AUF used is reviewed on a periodic basis and revised as necessary. Our historical experience generally indicates that the
impact of settlement at a landfill is greater later in the life of the landfill when the waste placed at the landfill approaches
its highest point under the permit requirements.
After determining the costs and remaining permitted and expansion capacity at each of our landfills, we determine the
per ton rates that will be expensed as waste is received and deposited at the landfill by dividing the costs by the
corresponding number of tons. We calculate per ton amortization rates for each landfill for assets associated with each
final capping event, for assets related to closure and post-closure activities and for all other costs capitalized or to be
capitalized in the future. These rates per ton are updated annually, or more often, as significant facts change.
It is possible that actual results, including the amount of costs incurred, the timing of final capping, closure and post-
closure activities, our airspace utilization or the success of our expansion efforts could ultimately turn out to be
significantly different from our estimates and assumptions. To the extent that such estimates, or related assumptions, prove
to be significantly different than actual results, lower profitability may be experienced due to higher amortization rates or
higher expenses; or higher profitability may result if the opposite occurs. Most significantly, if it is determined that
expansion capacity should no longer be considered in calculating the recoverability of a landfill asset, we may be required
to recognize an asset impairment or incur significantly higher amortization expense. If at any time management makes the
decision to abandon the expansion effort, the capitalized costs related to the expansion effort are expensed immediately.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
A significant portion of our operating costs and capital expenditures could be characterized as costs of environmental
protection. The nature of our operations, particularly with respect to the construction, operation and maintenance of our
landfills subjects us to an array of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Under current laws
and regulations, we may have liabilities for environmental damage caused by operations, or for damage caused by
conditions that existed before we acquired a site. These liabilities include PRP investigations, settlements, and certain legal
and consultant fees, as well as costs directly associated with site investigation and clean up, such as materials, external
contractor costs and incremental internal costs directly related to the remedy. We provide for expenses associated with
environmental remediation obligations when such amounts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. We routinely
63
review and evaluate sites that require remediation and determine our estimated cost for the likely remedy based on a
number of estimates and assumptions.
Where it is probable that a liability has been incurred, we estimate costs required to remediate sites based on
site - specific facts and circumstances. We routinely review and evaluate sites that require remediation, considering whether
we were an owner, operator, transporter, or generator at the site, the amount and type of waste hauled to the site and the
number of years we were associated with the site. Next, we review the same type of information with respect to other
named and unnamed PRPs. Estimates of the costs for the likely remedy are then either developed using our internal
resources or by third-party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based
on:
Management’s judgment and experience in remediating our own and unrelated parties’ sites;
Information available from regulatory agencies as to costs of remediation;
The number, financial resources and relative degree of responsibility of other PRPs who may be liable for
remediation of a specific site; and
The typical allocation of costs among PRPs, unless the actual allocation has been determined.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities
Significant estimates are made in determining the fair value of long-lived tangible and intangible assets (i.e., property
and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill) during the impairment evaluation process. In addition, the majority of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are required to be recognized at fair value under the
relevant accounting guidance.
Property and Equipment, Including Landfills and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets — We monitor the carrying value
of our long-lived assets for potential impairment on an ongoing basis and test the recoverability of such assets generally
using significant unobservable (“Level 3”) inputs whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying
amounts may not be recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances, including management decisions pertaining
to such assets, are referred to as impairment indicators. If an impairment indicator occurs, we perform a test of
recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset or asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows.
If cash flows cannot be separately and independently identified for a single asset, we will determine whether an impairment
has occurred for the group of assets for which we can identify the projected cash flows. If the carrying values are in excess
of undiscounted expected future cash flows, we measure any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset or asset
group to its carrying value and the difference is recorded in the period that the impairment indicator occurs. Fair value is
generally determined by considering (i) internally developed discounted projected cash flow analysis of the asset or asset
group; (ii) actual third-party valuations and/or (iii) information available regarding the current market for similar assets.
Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually
realized, which could impact our ability to accurately assess whether an asset has been impaired.
The assessment of impairment indicators and the recoverability of our capitalized costs associated with landfills and
related expansion projects require significant judgment due to the unique nature of the waste industry, the highly regulated
permitting process and the sensitive estimates involved. During the review of a landfill expansion application, a regulator
may initially deny the expansion application although the expansion permit is ultimately granted. In addition, management
may periodically divert waste from one landfill to another to conserve remaining permitted landfill airspace, or a landfill
may be required to cease accepting waste, prior to receipt of the expansion permit. However, such events occur in the
ordinary course of business in the waste industry and do not necessarily result in impairment of our landfill assets because,
after consideration of all facts, such events may not affect our belief that we will ultimately obtain the expansion permit.
As a result, our tests of recoverability, which generally make use of a probability-weighted cash flow estimation approach,
may indicate that no impairment loss should be recorded.
64
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, Including Goodwill — At least annually, and more frequently if warranted, we
assess the indefinite-lived intangible assets including the goodwill of our reporting units for impairment using Level 3
inputs.
We first perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting
unit was less than its carrying value. If the assessment indicates a possible impairment, we complete a quantitative review,
comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. An impairment charge
is recognized if the asset’s estimated fair value was less than its carrying amount. Fair value is typically estimated using
an income approach. However, when appropriate, we may also use a market approach. The income approach is based on
the long-term projected future cash flows of the reporting units. We discount the estimated cash flows to present value
using a weighted average cost of capital that considers factors such as market assumptions, the timing of the cash flows
and the risks inherent in those cash flows. We believe that this approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value
estimate based upon the reporting units’ expected long-term performance considering the economic and market conditions
that generally affect our business. The market approach estimates fair value by measuring the aggregate market value of
publicly-traded companies with similar characteristics to our business as a multiple of their reported earnings. We then
apply that multiple to the reporting units’ earnings to estimate their fair values. We believe that this approach may also be
appropriate in certain circumstances because it provides a fair value estimate using valuation inputs from entities with
operations and economic characteristics comparable to our reporting units.
Fair value is computed using several factors, including projected future operating results, economic projections,
anticipated future cash flows, comparable marketplace data and the cost of capital. There are inherent uncertainties related
to these factors and to our judgment in applying them in our analysis. However, we believe our methodology for estimating
the fair value of our reporting units is reasonable.
Acquisitions — In accordance with the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price paid for an acquisition is
allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, with the
excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired recorded as goodwill. When we are in the process of valuing all
of the assets and liabilities acquired in an acquisition, there can be subsequent adjustments to our estimates of fair value
and resulting preliminary purchase price allocation.
See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Gain) Loss
from Divestitures, Asset Impairments and Unusual Items, Net.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have financial interests in unconsolidated variable interest entities as discussed in Note 18 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Additionally, we are party to guarantee arrangements with unconsolidated entities as discussed in
the Guarantees section of Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These arrangements have not materially
affected our financial position, results of operations or liquidity during the year ended December 31, 2021, nor are they
expected to have a material impact on our future financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Inflation
Accelerated and pronounced economic pressures, particularly related to inflationary cost pressures on labor and the
goods and services we rely upon to deliver service to our customers, had a more significant impact on our cost structure
and capital expenditures in 2021. Our overall strategic pricing efforts are focused on recovering as much of the inflationary
cost increases we experience in our business as possible by increasing our average unit rate. A significant portion of our
revenue is tied to a price escalation index with a lookback provision, which has resulted in a timing lag in our ability to
recover increased costs under these contracts during this period of rapid inflation. Separately, for many of our customers
we provide services under multi-year contracts that can restrict our ability to increase prices and the timing of such
increases. As we enter 2022, many of these contract lookback provisions will begin to capture the recent inflationary cost
increases in the price escalation calculation. We are taking proactive steps to recover inflationary cost pressures through
the price of our service and by managing our costs through efficiency, labor productivity and investments in technology
65
to automate certain aspects of our business in order to mitigate the inflationary cost pressures we have seen in our business.
Refer to Item 1A. Risk Factors for further discussion.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates, certain
commodity prices and Canadian currency rates. From time to time, we use derivatives to manage some portion of these
risks. The Company had no derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2021.
Interest Rate Exposure — Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our financing
activities. As of December 31, 2021, we had $13.5 billion of long-term debt, excluding the impacts of accounting for debt
issuance costs, discounts and fair value adjustments attributable to terminated interest rate derivatives. We have
$2.5 billion of debt that is exposed to changes in market interest rates within the next 12 months comprised of
(i) $1.8 billion of short - term borrowings under our commercial paper program; (ii) $645 billion of tax-exempt bonds with
term interest rate periods that expire within the next 12 months and (iii) $54 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds that
are subject to repricing on a weekly basis. We currently estimate that a 100 - basis point increase in the interest rates of our
outstanding variable-rate debt obligations would increase our 2022 interest expense by $7 million.
Our remaining outstanding debt obligations have fixed interest rates through either the scheduled maturity of the debt
or, for certain of our fixed-rate tax-exempt bonds, through the end of a term interest rate period that exceeds 12 months.
The fair value of our fixed-rate debt obligations can increase or decrease significantly if market interest rates change.
We performed a sensitivity analysis to determine how market rate changes might affect the fair value of our market
risk-sensitive debt instruments. This analysis is inherently limited because it reflects a singular, hypothetical set of
assumptions. Actual market movements may vary significantly from our assumptions. An instantaneous, 100 - basis point
increase in interest rates across all maturities attributable to these instruments would have decreased the fair value of our
debt by approximately $900 million as of December 31, 2021.
We are also exposed to interest rate market risk from our cash and cash equivalent balances, as well as assets held in
restricted trust funds and escrow accounts. These assets are generally invested in high-quality, liquid instruments including
money market funds that invest in U.S. government obligations with original maturities of three months or less. We believe
that our exposure to changes in fair value of these assets due to interest rate fluctuations is insignificant as the fair value
generally approximates our cost basis. We also invest a portion of our restricted trust and escrow account balances in
available-for-sale securities, including U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency securities, municipal securities, mortgage-
and asset-backed securities, which generally mature over the next nine years, as well as equity securities.
Commodity Price Exposure — In the normal course of our business, we are subject to operating agreements that
expose us to market risks arising from changes in the prices for commodities such as diesel fuel, electricity and recycled
materials, including old corrugated cardboard and plastics. We work to manage these risks through operational strategies
that focus on capturing our costs in the prices we charge our customers for the services provided. Accordingly, as the
market prices for these commodities increase or decrease, our revenues, operating costs and margins may also increase or
decrease. As discussed in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, we saw significant increases in commodity prices and demand for recycled materials in 2021, resulting in
increased annual revenue for our recycling business of $537 million. Variability in commodity prices can also impact the
margins of our business as certain components of our revenue are structured as a pass through of costs, including recycling
brokerage and fuel surcharges.
Currency Rate Exposure — We have operations in Canada as well as certain support functions in India. Where
significant, we have quantified and described the impact of foreign currency translation on components of income,
including operating revenue and operating expenses. However, the impact of foreign currency has not materially affected
our results of operations.
66
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 42) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page
68
72
73
73
74
75
76
67
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Waste Management, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Waste Management, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Waste Management, Inc. (the Company)
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on
the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) (PCAOB), the 2021 consolidated financial statements of the Company, and our report dated February 15, 2022
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained
in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded
as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Houston, Texas
February 15, 2022
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
68
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Waste Management, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Waste Management, Inc. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and
changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 15, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and
the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of
the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements
that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or
disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate
opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
69
Description of
Matter
the
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
Landfill Amortization
At December 31, 2021, the Company’s landfill assets, net of accumulated amortization,
totaled $7.3 billion and the associated amortization expense for 2021 was $731 million. As
discussed in Note 2 of the financial statements, the Company updates the estimates used to
calculate individual landfill amortization rates at least annually, or more often if significant
facts change. Landfill amortization rates are used in the computation of landfill amortization
expense.
Auditing landfill amortization rates and related amortization expense is complex due to the
highly judgmental nature of assumptions used in estimating the rates. Significant assumptions
used in the calculation of the rates include: estimated future development costs associated
with the construction and retirement of the landfill, estimated remaining permitted airspace
and unpermitted expansion airspace, airspace utilization factors, projected annual tonnage
intakes, and projected timing of retirement activities.
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of
the Company’s controls over determining landfill amortization rates and calculating
amortization expense. Our audit procedures included, among others, testing controls over: the
Company’s process for evaluating and updating the significant assumptions used in the
development of the landfill amortization rates, management’s review of those significant
assumptions, and the mathematical accuracy of the calculation and recording of amortization
expense.
To test the landfill asset amortization rates, our audit procedures included, among others,
assessing methodologies used by the Company and testing the significant assumptions
discussed above, inclusive of the underlying data used by the Company in its development of
these assumptions. We compared the significant assumptions used by management to
historical trends and, when available, to comparable size landfills accepting a similar type of
waste. Regarding unpermitted expansion airspace, we evaluated the Company’s criteria for
inclusion in remaining airspace. In addition, we considered the professional qualifications and
objectivity of management’s internal engineers responsible for developing the assumptions.
We involved EY’s engineering specialists to assist with the evaluation of the Company’s
landfill future development cost and airspace assumptions. We also tested the completeness
and accuracy of the historical data utilized in the development of the landfill amortization
rates.
70
Landfill – Final Capping, Closure and Post-Closure Costs
Description of
Matter
the
At December 31, 2021, the carrying value of the Company’s landfill asset retirement
obligations related to final capping, closure and post-closure costs totaled $2.3 billion. As
discussed in Note 2 of the financial statements, the Company updates the estimates used to
measure the asset retirement obligations annually, or more often if significant facts change.
How We Addressed the
Matter in Our Audit
Auditing the landfill asset retirement obligation is complex due to the highly judgmental
nature of the assumptions used in the measurement process. These assumptions include:
estimated future costs associated with the capping, closure and post closure activities at each
specific landfill; airspace consumed to date in relation to total estimated permitted airspace;
the projected annual tonnage intake; and the projected timing of retirement activities.
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of
the Company’s controls over the calculation of asset retirement obligations. Our audit
procedures included, among others, testing the Company’s controls over the landfill asset
retirement obligation estimation process and management’s review of the significant
assumptions used in the estimation of the liability, including the amount and timing of
retirement costs.
To test the landfill asset retirement obligation valuation, we performed audit procedures that
included, among others, assessing methodologies used by the Company, testing the
completeness of activities included in the estimate (e.g., gas monitoring and extraction), and
testing the significant assumptions discussed above, inclusive of the underlying data used by
the Company in its development of these assumptions. We compared the significant
assumptions used by management to historical trends and, when available, to comparable size
landfills accepting the same type of waste. In addition, we considered the professional
qualifications and objectivity of management’s internal engineers responsible for developing
the assumptions. We involved EY engineering specialists to assist us with these procedures.
Specifically, we utilized the EY engineering specialists to evaluate the reasons for significant
changes in assumptions from the historical trend, and to determine whether the change from
the historical trend was appropriate and identified timely. We also tested the completeness
and accuracy of the historical data utilized in preparing the estimate.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
Houston, Texas
February 15, 2022
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
71
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Millions, Except Share and Par Value Amounts)
December 31,
2021
2020
Current assets:
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25 and $33, respectively . . .
Other receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8 and $7, respectively . . . . . . .
Parts and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
118
2,278
268
135
270
3,069
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $20,537 and
$19,337, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted trust and escrow accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14,419
9,028
898
348
432
903
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,097
Current liabilities:
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill and environmental remediation liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,375
1,428
571
708
4,082
12,697
1,694
2,373
1,125
21,971
$
553
2,097
527
124
239
3,540
14,148
8,994
1,024
347
426
866
$ 29,345
$ 1,121
1,342
539
551
3,553
13,259
1,806
2,222
1,051
21,891
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Waste Management, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized; 630,282,461 shares
6
issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5,169
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12,004
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(10,072)
Treasury stock at cost, 214,158,636 and 207,480,827 shares, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,124
Total Waste Management, Inc. stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7,126
Total liabilities and equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,097
6
5,129
11,159
39
(8,881)
7,452
2
7,454
$ 29,345
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
72
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Millions, Except per Share Amounts)
Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs and expenses:
$
Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual items, net. . . .
Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in net losses of unconsolidated entities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests. . . . . . . . . . .
Net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
Year Ended December 31,
2020
15,218
2021
17,931 $
$
11,111
1,864
1,999
8
(16)
14,966
2,965
(365)
(220)
(36)
5
(616)
2,349
532
1,817
1
1,816 $
4.32 $
4.29 $
9,341
1,728
1,671
9
35
12,784
2,434
(425)
(53)
(68)
5
(541)
1,893
397
1,496
—
1,496
3.54
3.52
$
$
$
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Millions)
2021
Year Ended December 31,
2020
1,496
1,817 $
$
9
(6)
(28)
3
(22)
1,795
1
1,794 $
15
11
20
1
47
1,543
—
1,543
$
Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
$
Derivative instruments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Available-for-sale securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Post-retirement benefit obligation, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Comprehensive income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
73
2019
15,455
9,496
1,631
1,574
6
42
12,749
2,706
(411)
(85)
(55)
(50)
(601)
2,105
434
1,671
1
1,670
3.93
3.91
2019
1,671
8
15
55
1
79
1,750
1
1,749
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Millions)
Year Ended December 31,
2020
2019
2021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Consolidated net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest accretion on landfill and environmental remediation liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on disposal of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss from divestitures, asset impairments and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in net losses of unconsolidated entities, net of dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenues and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from divestitures of businesses and other assets, net of cash divested . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from financing activities:
New borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt repayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Premiums and other paid on early extinguishment of debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock repurchase program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of common stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax payments associated with equity-based compensation transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash
equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents . . . . .
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . .
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . .
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of
period:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in restricted trust and escrow accounts . . . . . .
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . .
$
1,817 $
1,496
$
1,671
1,999
(77)
111
37
108
(25)
(16)
38
220
28
(39)
34
206
(103)
4,338
(75)
(1,904)
96
(11)
(1,894)
7,948
(8,404)
(211)
(1,350)
(970)
66
(28)
49
(2,900)
1,671
165
103
54
94
(9)
43
60
53
(179)
10
53
(37)
(174)
3,403
(4,085)
(1,632)
885
(15)
(4,847)
9,420
(9,629)
(30)
(402)
(927)
63
(34)
(20)
(1,559)
1,574
100
98
39
86
(27)
113
55
85
(53)
(23)
10
243
(97)
3,874
(521)
(1,818)
49
(86)
(2,376)
13,237
(10,088)
(84)
(248)
(876)
67
(33)
(11)
1,964
2
(454)
648
194 $
4
(2,999)
3,647
648
118 $
7
69
194 $
553
28
67
648
2
3,464
183
3,647
3,561
15
71
3,647
$
$
$
$
$
$
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
74
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In Millions, Except Shares in Thousands)
Waste Management, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
Additional
Paid-In
Total Shares Amounts Capital
Common Stock
Accumulated
Other
Retained Comprehensive
Earnings Income (Loss)
(87)
—
9,797 $
1,670
4,993 $
—
Treasury Stock
Shares Amounts
Noncontrolling
Interests
(206,299) $
—
(8,434) $
—
Balance, December 31, 2018 . . $ 6,276 630,282 $
Consolidated net income . . . . . 1,671
—
Other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . .
79
—
Cash dividends declared of
$2.05 per common share . . . .
(876)
—
Equity-based compensation
transactions, net of tax . . . . .
164
—
Common stock repurchase
program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2019 . . $ 7,070 630,282 $
Adoption of new accounting
(244)
—
standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2)
Consolidated net income . . . . . 1,496
Other comprehensive income
—
—
(loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . .
47
—
Cash dividends declared of
$2.18 per common share . . . .
(927)
—
Equity-based compensation
transactions, net . . . . . . . . . .
172
—
Common stock repurchase
—
program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Balance, December 31, 2020 . . $ 7,454 630,282 $
Consolidated net income . . . . . 1,817
—
Other comprehensive income
(402)
—
(loss), net of tax . . . . . . . . . .
(22)
—
Cash dividends declared of
$2.30 per common share . . . .
(970)
—
Equity-based compensation
transactions, net . . . . . . . . . .
198
—
Common stock repurchase
—
program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,350)
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
(1)
Balance, December 31, 2021 . . $ 7,126 630,282 $
6 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
56
—
—
—
(876)
1
—
—
6 $
5,049 $ 10,592 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
80
—
—
(2)
1,496
—
(927)
1
—
(1)
6 $
5,129 $ 11,159 $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
110
(70)
—
1,816
—
(970)
(1)
—
—
6 $
5,169 $ 12,004 $
79
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,585
107
—
—
(8)
(2,247)
5
(205,956) $
(244)
—
(8,571) $
—
—
47
—
—
—
—
39
—
—
—
—
—
2,158
—
—
—
—
91
(3,687)
4
(207,481) $
—
(402)
1
(8,881) $
—
(22)
—
—
2,049
—
—
89
(8,731)
4
(214,159) $
(1,280)
—
(10,072) $
—
—
—
—
17
1
1
—
—
—
—
—
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
1
—
—
—
—
(1)
2
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
75
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
1. Basis of Presentation
The financial statements presented in this report represent the consolidation of Waste Management, Inc., a Delaware
corporation; its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries; and certain variable interest entities for which Waste
Management, Inc. or its subsidiaries are the primary beneficiaries as described in Note 18. Waste Management, Inc. is a
holding company and all operations are conducted by its subsidiaries. When the terms “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”
are used in this document, those terms refer to Waste Management, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and consolidated
variable interest entities. When we use the term “WMI,” we are referring only to Waste Management, Inc., the parent
holding company.
We are North America’s leading provider of comprehensive waste management environmental services, providing
services throughout the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. We partner with our residential, commercial, industrial and
municipal customers and the communities we serve to manage and reduce waste at each stage from collection to disposal,
while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. Our “Solid Waste” business is operated and
managed locally by our subsidiaries that focus on distinct geographic areas and provide collection, transfer, disposal, and
recycling and resource recovery services. Through our subsidiaries, we are also a leading developer, operator and owner
of landfill gas-to-energy facilities in the U.S.
In 2021, our senior management began evaluating, overseeing and managing the financial performance of our Solid
Waste operations through two operating segments. Our East Tier primarily consists of geographic areas located in the
Eastern U.S., the Great Lakes region and substantially all of Canada. Our West Tier primarily includes geographic areas
located in the Western U.S., including the upper Midwest region, and British Columbia, Canada. Each of our Solid Waste
operating segments provides integrated environmental services, including collection, transfer, recycling, and disposal. The
Company finalized the assessment of our segments during the fourth quarter of 2021. The East and West Tiers are
presented in this report and constitute our existing Solid Waste business. On October 30, 2020, we acquired Advanced
Disposal Services, Inc. (“Advanced Disposal”), the operations of which are presented in this report within our existing
Solid Waste tiers. We also provide additional services that are not managed through our Solid Waste business, which are
presented in this report as “Other.” Additional information related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal and segments
is included in Notes 17 and 19.
Reclassifications
When necessary, reclassifications have been made to our prior period financial information to conform to the
current year presentation and are not material to our consolidated financial statements. In our Annual Report on Form 10 - K
for the year ended December 31, 2020, our accumulated depreciation and gross property and equipment balances as of
December 31, 2020 were overstated. We subsequently corrected the balances in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and have provided the corrected balances in all filings thereafter.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of WMI, its wholly-owned and
majority - owned subsidiaries and certain variable interest entities for which we have determined that we are the primary
beneficiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated
entities are accounted for under the appropriate method of accounting.
76
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing our financial statements, we make numerous estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for
and recognition and disclosure of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses. We must make these estimates and
assumptions because certain information that we use is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with precision
from available data or simply cannot be calculated. In some cases, these estimates are difficult to determine, and we must
exercise significant judgment. In preparing our financial statements, the most difficult, subjective and complex estimates
and the assumptions that present the greatest amount of uncertainty relate to our accounting for landfills, environmental
remediation liabilities, long-lived assets and intangible asset impairments and the fair value of assets and liabilities
acquired in business combinations. Each of these items is discussed in additional detail below. Actual results could differ
materially from the estimates and assumptions that we use in the preparation of our financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash in excess of current operating requirements is invested in short-term interest-bearing instruments with maturities
of three months or less at the date of purchase and is stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash
equivalents, investments held within our restricted trust and escrow accounts, and accounts receivable. We make efforts
to control our exposure to credit risk associated with these instruments by (i) placing our assets and other financial interests
with a diverse group of credit-worthy financial institutions; (ii) holding high-quality financial instruments while limiting
investments in any one instrument and (iii) maintaining strict policies over credit extension that include credit evaluations,
credit limits and monitoring procedures, although generally we do not have collateral requirements for credit extensions.
We also control our exposure associated with trade receivables by discontinuing service, to the extent allowable, to
non - paying customers. However, our overall credit risk associated with trade receivables is limited due to the large number
and diversity of customers we serve. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, no single customer represented greater than
5% of total accounts receivable.
Accounts and Other Receivables
Our receivables, which are recorded when billed, when services are performed or when cash is advanced, are claims
against third parties that will generally be settled in cash. The carrying value of our receivables, net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts, represents the estimated net realizable value. We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based
on historical collection trends; type of customer, such as municipal or commercial; the age of outstanding receivables and
existing as well as expected economic conditions. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that specific receivable
balances may be impaired, further consideration is given to the collectability of those balances and the allowance is
adjusted accordingly. Past-due receivable balances are written off when our internal collection efforts have been
unsuccessful. Also, we recognize interest income on long-term interest-bearing notes receivable as the interest accrues
under the terms of the notes. We no longer accrue interest once the notes are deemed uncollectible.
77
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts of trade receivables for the year ended
December 31 (in millions):
Balance as of January 1, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Adoption of new accounting standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions charged to expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts written-off, net of recoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions, divestitures and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of December 31, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2021
2020
33
—
35
(36)
(7)
25
$
$
28
(1)
51
(44)
(1)
33
For trade receivables the Company relies upon, among other factors, historical loss trends, the age of outstanding
receivables, and existing as well as expected economic conditions. We determined that all of our trade receivables share
similar risk characteristics. We monitor our credit exposure on an ongoing basis and assess whether assets in the pool
continue to display similar risk characteristics.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $2,278 million of trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$25 million. As of December 31, 2020, we had $2,097 million of trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $33 million. In January 2020, COVID-19 was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and
subsequently declared a global pandemic in March 2020. With this in mind, during 2020, we extended payment terms and
postponed collections and service discontinuation for customers who were negatively impacted by the COVID-19
pandemic. These actions contributed to an increase in the aging of outstanding balances during the year and resulted in a
related increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts. Improved economic conditions during 2021 have allowed us to
return to more regular business practices, in accordance with our contractual terms. Based on aging analyses as of both
December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately 90% of our trade receivables were outstanding less than 60 days.
For other receivables, as well as loans and other instruments, the Company relies primarily on credit ratings and
associated default rates based on the maturity of the instrument. All receivables, as well as other instruments, are adjusted
for our expectation of future market conditions and trends. As of December 31, 2021, we had $451 million of notes and
other receivables, net of allowance of $10 million. As of December 31, 2020, we had $703 million of notes and other
receivables, net of allowance of $8 million. Based on an aging analysis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately
60% and 75%, respectively, of our other receivables were due within 12 months or less.
Other receivables, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, include receivables related to income tax payments in excess
of our current income tax obligations of $166 million and $414 million, respectively. Other receivables as of
December 31, 2021 and 2020 also include a receivable of $14 million and $20 million, respectively, related to federal
natural gas fuel credits.
Parts and Supplies
Parts and supplies consist primarily of spare parts, fuel, tires, lubricants and processed recycling materials. Our parts
and supplies are stated at the lower of cost, using the average cost method, or market.
Landfill Accounting
Cost Basis of Landfill Assets — We capitalize various costs that we incur to make a landfill ready to accept waste.
These costs generally include expenditures for land (including the landfill footprint and required landfill buffer property);
permitting; excavation; liner material and installation; landfill leachate collection systems; landfill gas collection systems;
environmental monitoring equipment for groundwater and landfill gas; and directly related engineering, capitalized
78
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
interest, on-site road construction and other capital infrastructure costs. The cost basis of our landfill assets also includes
asset retirement costs, which represent estimates of future costs associated with landfill final capping, closure and
post - closure activities. These costs are discussed below.
Final Capping, Closure and Post-Closure Costs — Following is a description of our asset retirement activities and
our related accounting:
Final Capping — Involves the installation of flexible membrane liners and geosynthetic clay liners, drainage and
compacted soil layers and topsoil over areas of a landfill where total airspace has been consumed. Final capping
asset retirement obligations are recorded on a units-of-consumption basis as airspace is consumed related to the
specific final capping event with a corresponding increase in the landfill asset. Each final capping event is
accounted for as a discrete obligation and recorded as an asset and a liability based on estimates of the discounted
cash flows and airspace associated with each final capping event.
Closure — Includes the construction of the final portion of methane gas collection systems (when required),
demobilization and routine maintenance costs. These are costs incurred after the site ceases to accept waste, but
before the landfill is certified as closed by the applicable state regulatory agency. These costs are recorded as an
asset retirement obligation as airspace is consumed over the life of the landfill with a corresponding increase in
the landfill asset. Closure obligations are recorded over the life of the landfill based on estimates of the discounted
cash flows associated with performing closure activities.
Post-Closure — Involves the maintenance and monitoring of a landfill site that has been certified closed by the
applicable regulatory agency. Generally, we are required to maintain and monitor landfill sites for a 30-year
period. These maintenance and monitoring costs are recorded as an asset retirement obligation as airspace is
consumed over the life of the landfill with a corresponding increase in the landfill asset. Post-closure obligations
are recorded over the life of the landfill based on estimates of the discounted cash flows associated with
performing post-closure activities.
We develop our estimates of these obligations using input from our operations personnel, engineers and accountants.
Our estimates are based on our interpretation of current requirements and proposed regulatory changes and are intended
to approximate fair value. Absent quoted market prices, the estimate of fair value is based on the best available information,
including the results of present value techniques. In many cases, we contract with third parties to fulfill our obligations for
final capping, closure and post-closure. We use historical experience, professional engineering judgment and quoted or
actual prices paid for similar work to determine the fair value of these obligations. We are required to recognize these
obligations at market prices whether we plan to contract with third parties or perform the work ourselves. In those instances
where we perform the work with internal resources, the incremental profit margin realized is recognized as a component
of operating income when the work is completed.
Once we have determined final capping, closure and post-closure costs, we inflate those costs to the expected time of
payment and discount those expected future costs back to present value. As of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we
inflated these costs in current dollars to the expected time of payment using an inflation rate of 2.25%, 2.25% and 2.5%,
respectively. We discounted these costs to present value using the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate effective at the time an
obligation is incurred, consistent with the expected cash flow approach. Any changes in expectations that result in an
upward revision to the estimated cash flows are treated as a new liability and discounted at the current rate while downward
revisions are discounted at the historical weighted average rate of the recorded obligation. As a result, the credit-adjusted,
risk-free discount rate used to calculate the present value of an obligation is specific to each individual asset retirement
obligation. The weighted average rate applicable to our long-term asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2021
was approximately 4.6%.
79
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We record the estimated fair value of final capping, closure and post-closure liabilities for our landfills based on the
airspace consumed through the current period. The fair value of final capping obligations is developed based on our
estimates of the airspace consumed to date for each final capping event and the expected timing of each final capping
event. The fair value of closure and post-closure obligations is developed based on our estimates of the airspace consumed
to date for the entire landfill and the expected timing of each closure and post-closure activity. Because these obligations
are measured at estimated fair value using present value techniques, changes in the estimated cost or timing of future final
capping, closure and post-closure activities could result in a material change in these liabilities, related assets and results
of operations. We assess the appropriateness of the estimates used to develop our recorded balances annually, or more
often if significant facts change.
Sustained changes in inflation rates or the estimated costs, timing or extent of future final capping, closure and post-
closure activities typically result in both (i) a current adjustment to the recorded liability and landfill asset and (ii) a change
in liability and asset amounts to be recorded prospectively over either the remaining permitted and expansion airspace (as
defined below) of the related discrete final capping event or the remaining permitted and expansion airspace of the landfill,
as appropriate. Any changes related to the capitalized and future cost of the landfill assets are then recognized in accordance
with our amortization policy, which would generally result in amortization expense being recognized prospectively over
the remaining permitted and expansion airspace of the final capping event or the remaining permitted and expansion
airspace of the landfill, as appropriate. Changes in such estimates associated with airspace that has been fully utilized result
in an adjustment to the recorded liability and landfill assets with an immediate corresponding adjustment to landfill
airspace amortization expense.
Interest accretion on final capping, closure and post-closure liabilities is recorded using the effective interest method
and is recorded as final capping, closure and post-closure expense, which is included in operating expenses within our
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Amortization of Landfill Assets — The amortizable basis of a landfill includes (i) amounts previously expended and
capitalized; (ii) capitalized landfill final capping, closure and post-closure costs; (iii) projections of future purchase and
development costs required to develop the landfill site to its remaining permitted and expansion airspace and (iv) projected
asset retirement costs related to landfill final capping, closure and post-closure activities.
Amortization is recorded on a units-of-consumption basis, applying expense as a rate per ton. The rate per ton is
calculated by dividing each component of the amortizable basis of a landfill by the number of tons needed to fill the
corresponding asset’s airspace. For landfills that we do not own, but operate through lease or other contractual agreements,
the rate per ton is calculated based on expected airspace to be utilized over the lesser of the contractual term of the
underlying agreement or the life of the landfill.
We apply the following guidelines in determining a landfill’s remaining permitted and expansion airspace:
Remaining Permitted Airspace — Our engineers, in consultation with third-party engineering consultants and
surveyors, are responsible for determining remaining permitted airspace at our landfills. The remaining permitted
airspace is determined by an annual survey, which is used to compare the existing landfill topography to the
expected final landfill topography.
Expansion Airspace — We also include currently unpermitted expansion airspace in our estimate of remaining
permitted and expansion airspace in certain circumstances. First, to include airspace associated with an expansion
effort, we must generally expect the initial expansion permit application to be submitted within one year and the
final expansion permit to be received within five years. Second, we must believe that obtaining the expansion
permit is likely, considering the following criteria:
Personnel are actively working on the expansion of an existing landfill, including efforts to obtain land use
and local, state or provincial approvals;
80
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
We have a legal right to use or obtain land to be included in the expansion plan;
There are no significant known technical, legal, community, business, or political restrictions or similar
issues that could negatively affect the success of such expansion; and
Financial analysis has been completed based on conceptual design, and the results demonstrate that the
expansion meets Company criteria for investment.
For unpermitted airspace to be initially included in our estimate of remaining permitted and expansion airspace, the
expansion effort must meet all the criteria listed above. These criteria are evaluated by our field-based engineers,
accountants, managers and others to identify potential obstacles to obtaining the permits. Once the unpermitted airspace
is included, our policy provides that airspace may continue to be included in remaining permitted and expansion airspace
even if certain of these criteria are no longer met as long as we continue to believe we will ultimately obtain the permit,
based on the facts and circumstances of a specific landfill. In these circumstances, continued inclusion must be approved
through a landfill-specific review process that includes approval by our Chief Financial Officer on a quarterly basis. Of
the 15 landfill sites with expansions included as of December 31, 2021, two landfills required the Chief Financial Officer
to approve the inclusion of the unpermitted airspace because the permit application process did not meet the one- or
five - year requirements.
When we include the expansion airspace in our calculations of remaining permitted and expansion airspace, we also
include the projected costs for development, as well as the projected asset retirement costs related to final capping, closure
and post-closure of the expansion in the amortization basis of the landfill.
Once the remaining permitted and expansion airspace is determined in cubic yards, an airspace utilization factor
(“AUF”) is established to calculate the remaining permitted and expansion capacity in tons. The AUF is established using
the measured density obtained from previous annual surveys and is then adjusted to account for future settlement. The
amount of settlement that is forecasted will take into account several site-specific factors including current and projected
mix of waste type, initial and projected waste density, estimated number of years of life remaining, depth of underlying
waste, anticipated access to moisture through precipitation or recirculation of landfill leachate and operating practices. In
addition, the initial selection of the AUF is subject to a subsequent multi-level review by our engineering group and the
AUF used is reviewed on a periodic basis and revised as necessary. Our historical experience generally indicates that the
impact of settlement at a landfill is greater later in the life of the landfill when the waste placed at the landfill approaches
its highest point under the permit requirements.
After determining the costs and remaining permitted and expansion capacity at each of our landfills, we determine the
per ton rates that will be expensed as waste is received and deposited at the landfill by dividing the costs by the
corresponding number of tons. We calculate per ton amortization rates for each landfill for assets associated with each
final capping event, for assets related to closure and post-closure activities and for all other costs capitalized or to be
capitalized in the future. These rates per ton are updated annually, or more often, as significant facts change.
It is possible that actual results, including the amount of costs incurred, the timing of final capping, closure and
post - closure activities, our airspace utilization or the success of our expansion efforts could ultimately turn out to be
significantly different from our estimates and assumptions. To the extent that such estimates, or related assumptions, prove
to be significantly different than actual results, lower profitability may be experienced due to higher amortization rates or
higher expenses; or higher profitability may result if the opposite occurs. Most significantly, if it is determined that
expansion capacity should no longer be considered in calculating the recoverability of a landfill asset, we may be required
to recognize an asset impairment or incur significantly higher amortization expense. If at any time management makes the
decision to abandon the expansion effort, the capitalized costs related to the expansion effort are expensed immediately.
81
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
A significant portion of our operating costs and capital expenditures could be characterized as costs of environmental
protection. The nature of our operations, particularly with respect to the construction, operation and maintenance of our
landfills, subjects us to an array of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Under current laws
and regulations, we may have liabilities for environmental damage caused by our operations, or for damage caused by
conditions that existed before we acquired a site. In addition to remediation activity required by state or local authorities,
such liabilities include potentially responsible party (“PRP”) investigations. The costs associated with these liabilities can
include settlements, certain legal and consultant fees, as well as incremental internal and external costs directly associated
with site investigation and clean up.
Where it is probable that a liability has been incurred, we estimate costs required to remediate sites based on
site - specific facts and circumstances. We routinely review and evaluate sites that require remediation, considering whether
we were an owner, operator, transporter, or generator at the site, the amount and type of waste hauled to the site and the
number of years we were associated with the site. Next, we review the same type of information with respect to other
named and unnamed PRPs. Estimates of the costs for the likely remedy are then either developed using our internal
resources or by third-party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based
on:
Management’s judgment and experience in remediating our own and unrelated parties’ sites;
Information available from regulatory agencies as to costs of remediation;
The number, financial resources and relative degree of responsibility of other PRPs who may be liable for
remediation of a specific site; and
The typical allocation of costs among PRPs, unless the actual allocation has been determined.
Estimating our degree of responsibility for remediation is inherently difficult. We recognize and accrue for an
estimated remediation liability when we determine that such liability is both probable and reasonably estimable.
Determining the method and ultimate cost of remediation requires that a number of assumptions be made. There can
sometimes be a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with the likely site remediation alternatives identified
in the environmental impact investigation. In these cases, we use the amount within the range that is our best estimate. If
no amount within a range appears to be a better estimate than any other, we use the amount that is the low end of such
range. If we used the high ends of such ranges, our aggregate potential liability would be approximately $135 million
higher than the $213 million recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021. Our ultimate
responsibility may differ materially from current estimates. It is possible that technological, regulatory or enforcement
developments, the results of environmental studies, the inability to identify other PRPs, the inability of other PRPs to
contribute to the settlements of such liabilities, or other factors could require us to record additional liabilities. Our ongoing
review of our remediation liabilities, in light of relevant internal and external facts and circumstances, could result in
revisions to our accruals that could cause upward or downward adjustments to our balance sheet and income from
operations. These adjustments could be material in any given period.
82
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Where we believe that both the amount of a particular environmental remediation liability and the timing of the
payments are fixed or reliably determinable, we inflate the cost in current dollars until the expected time of payment and
discount the cost to present value using a risk-free discount rate, which is based on the rate for U.S. Treasury bonds with
a term approximating the weighted average period until settlement of the underlying obligation. As of December 31, 2021
and 2020, we inflated the costs by 2.25%. We determine the risk-free discount rate and the inflation rate on an annual basis
unless interim changes would materially impact our results of operations. For remedial liabilities that have been
discounted, we include interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in operating expenses in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The following table summarizes the impacts of revisions in the risk-free discount rate applied
to our environmental remediation liabilities and recovery assets for the year ended December 31 (in millions) and the risk-
free discount rate applied as of December 31:
Increase (decrease) in operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free discount rate applied to environmental remediation liabilities and
2021
2020
2019
$
(4)
$
8
$
9
recovery assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.50 %
1.00 %
1.75 %
The portion of our recorded environmental remediation liabilities that were not subject to inflation or discounting, as
the amounts and timing of payments are not fixed or reliably determinable, was $31 million and $34 million as of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Had we not inflated and discounted any portion of our environmental
remediation liability, the amount recorded would have decreased by $6 million and $12 million as of December 31, 2021
and 2020, respectively.
Property and Equipment (exclusive of landfills, discussed above)
We record property and equipment at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and
maintenance activities are expensed as incurred. We depreciate property and equipment over the estimated useful life of
the asset using the straight-line method. We generally assume no salvage value for our depreciable property and equipment.
When property and equipment are retired, sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are
removed from our accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations as an offset or increase to
operating expense for the period.
The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows (in years):
Vehicles — excluding rail haul cars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vehicles — rail haul cars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment — including containers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Useful Lives
3 to 10
10 to 30
3 to 30
5 to 40
3 to 10
Leases
We lease property and equipment in the ordinary course of our business. Our operating lease activities primarily
consist of leases for real estate, landfills and operating equipment. Our financing lease activities primarily consist of leases
for operating equipment, railcars and landfill assets. Our leases have varying terms. Some may include renewal or purchase
options, escalation clauses, restrictions, penalties or other obligations that we consider in determining minimum lease
payments. The leases are classified as either operating leases or financing leases, as appropriate.
83
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Operating Leases (excluding landfill leases discussed below) — The majority of our leases are operating leases. This
classification generally can be attributed to either (i) relatively low fixed minimum lease payments as a result of real
property lease obligations that vary based on the volume of waste we receive or process or (ii) minimum lease terms that
are much shorter than the assets’ economic useful lives. Management expects that in the normal course of business our
operating leases will be renewed, replaced by other leases or replaced with fixed asset expenditures.
Financing Leases (excluding landfill leases discussed below) — Assets under financing leases are capitalized using
interest rates determined at the commencement of each lease and are amortized over either the useful life of the asset or
the lease term, as appropriate, on a straight-line basis. The present value of the related lease payments is recorded as a debt
obligation.
Landfill Leases — From an operating perspective, landfills that we lease are similar to landfills we own because
generally we will operate the landfill for the life of the operating permit. The most significant portion of our rental
obligations for landfill leases is contingent upon operating factors such as disposal volume and often there are no
contractual minimum rental obligations. Contingent rental obligations are expensed as incurred. For landfill financing
leases that provide for minimum contractual rental obligations, we record the present value of the minimum obligation as
part of the landfill asset, which is amortized on a units-of-consumption basis over the shorter of the lease term or the life
of the landfill.
For operating and financing leases, including landfill leases, our rent expense for each of the last three years and future
minimum lease payments are disclosed in Note 7.
Acquisitions
We generally recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, including contingent assets
and liabilities, based on fair value estimates as of the date of acquisition.
Contingent Consideration — In certain acquisitions, we agree to pay additional amounts to sellers contingent upon
achievement by the acquired businesses of certain negotiated goals, such as targeted revenue levels, targeted disposal
volumes or the issuance of permits for expanded landfill airspace. We have recognized liabilities for these contingent
obligations based on their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition with any differences between the
acquisition - date fair value, subsequent remeasurements and the ultimate settlement of the obligations being recognized as
an adjustment to income from operations.
Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities — Assets and liabilities arising from contingencies such as pre-acquisition
environmental matters and litigation are recognized at their acquisition-date fair value when their respective fair values
can be determined. If the fair values of such contingencies cannot be determined, they are recognized as of the acquisition
date if the contingencies are probable and an amount can be reasonably estimated.
Acquisition-date fair value estimates are revised as necessary if, and when, additional information regarding these
contingencies becomes available to further define and quantify assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Subsequent to
finalization of purchase accounting, these revisions are accounted for as adjustments to income from operations. All
acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred. See Note 17 for additional information related to our
acquisitions, including our 2020 acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
84
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of our purchase cost over the fair value of the net assets of acquired businesses. We do not
amortize goodwill, but as discussed in the Long-Lived Asset Impairments section below, we assess our goodwill for
impairment at least annually.
Other intangible assets consist primarily of customer and supplier relationships, covenants not-to-compete, licenses,
permits (other than landfill permits, as all landfill-related intangible assets are combined with landfill tangible assets and
amortized using our landfill amortization policy), and other contracts. Other intangible assets are recorded at fair value on
the acquisition date and are generally amortized using either a 150% declining balance approach or a straight-line basis as
we determine appropriate. Customer and supplier relationships are typically amortized over terms of 10 to 15 years.
Covenants not-to-compete are amortized over the term of the non-compete covenant, which is generally five years.
Licenses, permits and other contracts are amortized over the definitive terms of the related agreements. If the underlying
agreement does not contain definitive terms and the useful life is determined to be indefinite, the asset is not amortized.
Long-Lived Asset Impairments
We assess our long-lived assets for impairment as required under the applicable accounting standards. If necessary,
impairments are recorded in (gain) loss from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual items, net in our Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Property and Equipment, Including Landfills and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets — We monitor the carrying value
of our long-lived assets for potential impairment on an ongoing basis and test the recoverability of such assets generally
using significant unobservable (“Level 3”) inputs whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying
amounts may not be recoverable. These events or changes in circumstances, including management decisions pertaining
to such assets, are referred to as impairment indicators. If an impairment indicator occurs, we perform a test of
recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset or asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows.
If cash flows cannot be separately and independently identified for a single asset, we will determine whether an impairment
has occurred for the group of assets for which we can identify the projected cash flows. If the carrying values are in excess
of undiscounted expected future cash flows, we measure any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset or asset
group to its carrying value and the difference is recorded in the period that the impairment indicator occurs. Fair value is
generally determined by considering (i) internally developed discounted projected cash flow analysis of the asset or asset
group; (ii) actual third-party valuations and/or (iii) information available regarding the current market for similar assets.
Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment and projections may vary from the cash flows eventually
realized, which could impact our ability to accurately assess whether an asset has been impaired.
The assessment of impairment indicators and the recoverability of our capitalized costs associated with landfills and
related expansion projects require significant judgment due to the unique nature of the waste industry, the highly regulated
permitting process and the sensitive estimates involved. During the review of a landfill expansion application, a regulator
may initially deny the expansion application although the expansion permit is ultimately granted. In addition, management
may periodically divert waste from one landfill to another to conserve remaining permitted landfill airspace, or a landfill
may be required to cease accepting waste, prior to receipt of the expansion permit. However, such events occur in the
ordinary course of business in the waste industry and do not necessarily result in impairment of our landfill assets because,
after consideration of all facts, such events may not affect our belief that we will ultimately obtain the expansion permit.
As a result, our tests of recoverability, which generally make use of a probability-weighted cash flow estimation approach,
may indicate that no impairment loss should be recorded.
85
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, Including Goodwill — At least annually using a measurement date of October 1,
and more frequently if warranted, we assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, including the goodwill of our reporting
units, for impairment.
We first perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting
unit is less than its carrying value. If the assessment indicates a possible impairment, we complete a quantitative review,
comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. An impairment charge
is recognized if the asset’s estimated fair value is less than its carrying amount. Fair value is typically estimated using an
income approach using Level 3 inputs. However, when appropriate, we may also use a market approach. The income
approach is based on the long-term projected future cash flows of the reporting units. We discount the estimated cash flows
to present value using a weighted average cost of capital that considers factors such as market assumptions, the timing of
the cash flows and the risks inherent in those cash flows. We believe that this approach is appropriate because it provides
a fair value estimate based upon the reporting units’ expected long-term performance considering the economic and market
conditions that generally affect our business. The market approach estimates fair value by measuring the aggregate market
value of publicly-traded companies with similar characteristics to our business as a multiple of their reported earnings. We
then apply that multiple to the reporting units’ earnings to estimate their fair values. We believe that this approach may
also be appropriate in certain circumstances because it provides a fair value estimate using valuation inputs from entities
with operations and economic characteristics comparable to our reporting units.
Fair value is computed using several factors, including projected future operating results, economic projections,
anticipated future cash flows, comparable marketplace data and the cost of capital. There are inherent uncertainties related
to these factors and to our judgment in applying them in our analysis. However, we believe our methodology for estimating
the fair value of our reporting units is reasonable.
Refer to Note 11 for information related to impairments recognized during the reported periods.
Insured and Self-Insured Claims
We have retained a significant portion of the risks related to our health and welfare, general liability, automobile
liability and workers’ compensation claims programs. For our self-insured portions, the exposure for unpaid claims and
associated expenses, including incurred but not reported losses, is based on an actuarial valuation or internal estimates.
The gross estimated liability associated with settling unpaid claims is included in accrued liabilities in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets if expected to be settled within one year; otherwise, it is included in other long-term liabilities. Estimated
insurance recoveries related to recorded liabilities are reflected as other current receivables or other long-term assets in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets when we believe that the receipt of such amounts is probable.
We use a wholly-owned insurance captive to insure the deductibles for our general liability, automobile liability and
workers’ compensation claims programs. We continue to maintain conventional insurance policies with third-party
insurers. WMI pays an annual premium to the insurance captive on behalf of WMI and its insured subsidiaries, typically
in the first quarter of the year, for estimated losses based on an external actuarial analysis. These premiums are held in a
restricted funds account to be used solely for paying insurance claims, resulting in a transfer of risk from our Company to
the insurance captive, and are allocated between current and long-term assets depending on estimated timing of the use of
funds.
Restricted Trust and Escrow Accounts
Our restricted trust and escrow accounts consist principally of funds deposited for purposes of funding insurance
claims and settling landfill final capping, closure, post-closure and environmental remediation obligations. These funds
are generally allocated between cash, money market funds, equity securities and available-for-sale debt securities
86
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
depending on the estimated timing and purpose of the use of funds. We use a wholly-owned insurance captive to insure
the deductibles for certain claims programs and the premiums paid are directly deposited into a restricted escrow account
to be used solely for paying insurance claims. At several of our landfills, we provide financial assurance by depositing
cash into restricted trust or escrow accounts for purposes of settling final capping, closure, post-closure and environmental
remediation obligations. Balances maintained in these restricted trust and escrow accounts will fluctuate based on
(i) changes in statutory requirements; (ii) future deposits made to comply with contractual arrangements; (iii) the ongoing
use of funds; (iv) acquisitions or divestitures and (v) changes in the fair value of the financial instruments held in the
restricted trust or escrow accounts.
See Notes 16 and 18 for additional discussion related to restricted trust and escrow accounts for final capping, closure,
post - closure or environmental remediation obligations.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
Investments in unconsolidated entities over which the Company has significant influence are accounted for under the
equity method of accounting. Equity investments in which the Company does not have the ability to exert significant
influence over the investees’ operating and financing activities are measured using a quantitative approach as these
investments do not have readily determinable fair values. The quantitative approach, or measurement alternative, is equal
to its cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions
for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. The fair value of our redeemable preferred stock has been
measured based on third-party investors’ recent or pending transactions in these securities, which are considered the best
evidence of fair value. The following table summarizes our investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31 (in
millions):
Equity method investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments without readily determinable fair values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redeemable preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
335 $
48
49
432 $
314
63
49
426
2021
2020
We monitor and assess the carrying value of our investments throughout the year for potential impairment and write
them down to their fair value when other-than-temporary declines exist. Fair value is generally based on (i) other
third - party investors’ recent transactions in the securities; (ii) other information available regarding the current market for
similar assets; (iii) a market or income approach, as deemed appropriate and/or (iv) a quantitative approach, or
measurement alternative, as noted above. Impairments of our investments are recorded in equity in net losses of
unconsolidated entities or other, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations in accordance with appropriate
accounting guidance.
Refer to Note 11 for information related to impairments and other adjustments recognized during the reported periods.
Foreign Currency
We have operations in Canada, as well as certain support functions in India. Local currencies generally are considered
the functional currencies of our operations and investments outside the U.S. The assets and liabilities of our foreign
operations are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are
translated to U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate during the period. The resulting translation difference is reflected
as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency translation adjustments have been impacted by
decreases in the U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate from 1.2990 at December 31, 2019, to 1.2734 at
87
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2020 and to 1.2639 at December 31, 2021. Refer to Note 12 for information regarding the impacts of foreign
currency on our comprehensive income and results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
Our Solid Waste operating revenues are primarily generated from fees charged for our collection, transfer, disposal,
and recycling and resource recovery services, and from sales of commodities by our recycling and landfill gas-to-energy
operations. Revenues from our collection operations are influenced by factors such as collection frequency, type of
collection equipment furnished, type and volume or weight of the waste collected, distance to the disposal facility or
material recovery facility and our disposal costs. Revenues from our landfill operations consist of tipping fees, which are
generally based on the type and weight or volume of waste being disposed of at our disposal facilities. Fees charged at
transfer stations are generally based on the weight or volume of waste deposited, taking into account our cost of loading,
transporting and disposing of the solid waste at a disposal site. Recycling revenues generally consist of tipping fees and
the sale of recycling commodities to third parties. The fees we charge for our services generally include our environmental,
fuel surcharge and regulatory recovery fees, which are intended to pass through to customers direct and indirect costs
incurred. We also provide additional services that are not managed through our Solid Waste business, including our
Strategic Business Solutions (“WMSBS”) and Energy and Environmental Services (“EES”) businesses, recycling
brokerage services, landfill gas-to-energy services and certain other expanded service offerings and solutions.
We generally recognize revenue as services are performed or products are delivered. For example, revenue typically
is recognized as waste is collected, tons are received at our landfills or transfer stations, or recycling commodities are
collected or delivered as product. We bill for certain services prior to performance. Such services include, among others,
certain commercial and residential contracts and equipment rentals. These advance billings are included in deferred
revenues and recognized as revenue in the period service is provided.
See Note 19 for additional information related to revenue by reportable segment and major lines of business.
Deferred Revenues
We record deferred revenues when cash payments are received or due in advance of our performance and classify
them as current since they are earned within a year and there are no significant financing components. Substantially all
our deferred revenues during the reported periods are realized as revenues within one to three months, when the related
services are performed.
Contract Acquisition Costs
Our incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract, which consist primarily of sales incentives, are generally deferred
and amortized to selling, general and administrative expense over the estimated life of the relevant customer relationship,
ranging from five to 13 years. Contract acquisition costs that are paid to the customer are deferred and amortized as a
reduction in revenue over the contract life. Our contract acquisition costs are classified as current or noncurrent based on
the timing of when we expect to recognize amortization and are included in other assets in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had $175 million and $159 million of deferred contract costs, respectively,
of which $126 million and $118 million, respectively, were related to deferred sales incentives. During each of the years
ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we amortized $23 million of sales incentives to selling, general and
administrative expense.
88
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Long-Term Contracts
Approximately 25% of our total revenue is derived from contracts with a remaining term greater than one year. The
consideration for these contracts is primarily variable in nature. The variable elements of these contracts primarily include
the number of homes and businesses served and annual rate changes based on consumer price index, fuel prices or other
operating costs. Such contracts are generally within our collection, recycling and other lines of business and have a
weighted average remaining contract life of approximately four years. We do not disclose the value of unsatisfied
performance obligations for these contracts as our right to consideration corresponds directly to the value provided to the
customer for services completed to date and all future variable consideration is allocated to wholly unsatisfied performance
obligations.
Capitalized Interest
We capitalize interest on certain projects under development, including landfill expansion projects, certain assets
under construction, including operating landfills and landfill gas-to-energy projects and internal-use software. During
2021, 2020 and 2019, total interest costs were $388 million, $473 million and $485 million, respectively, of which
$13 million, $16 million and $21 million was capitalized in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company is primarily subject to income tax in the U.S. and Canada. Current tax obligations associated with our
income tax expense are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accrued liabilities
and our deferred tax obligations are reflected in deferred income taxes.
Deferred income taxes are based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the reporting period in the deferred tax assets and liabilities,
net of the effect of acquisitions and dispositions. Deferred tax assets include tax loss and credit carry-forwards and are
reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. We establish reserves for uncertain tax positions when, despite our belief that our
tax return positions are supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and potentially disallowed. When
facts and circumstances change, we adjust these reserves through our income tax expense.
Should interest and penalties be assessed by taxing authorities on any underpayment of income tax, such amounts
would be accrued and classified as a component of our income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 8 for discussion of our income taxes.
Contingent Liabilities
We estimate the amount of potential exposure we may have with respect to claims, assessments and litigation in
accordance with authoritative guidance on accounting for contingencies. We are party to pending or threatened legal
proceedings covering a wide range of matters in various jurisdictions. It is difficult to predict the outcome of litigation, as
it is subject to many uncertainties. Additionally, it is not always possible for management to make a meaningful estimate
of the potential loss or range of loss associated with such contingencies. See Note 10 for discussion of our commitments
and contingencies.
89
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table shows supplemental cash flow information for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Interest, net of capitalized interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
387 $
370
461
422
$
397
292
2021
2020
2019
During 2021, we had $30 million of non-cash financing activities from new financing leases. During 2020, we had
$50 million of non-cash financing activities primarily related to new financing leases, a portion of which were attributed
to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. During 2019, we had $299 million of non-cash financing activities from federal
low-income housing investments and new financing leases. Non-cash investing and financing activities are generally
excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
3. Landfill and Environmental Remediation Liabilities
Liabilities for landfill and environmental remediation costs as of December 31 are presented in the table below (in
millions):
Current (in accrued liabilities) . $
Long-term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill
137
2,189
2,326
$
2021
Environmental
Remediation
Total
$
$
29
184
213
$
$
$
Landfill
138
2,018
2,156
$
166
2,373
2,539
2020
Environmental
Remediation
$
$
26
204
230
Total
164
2,222
2,386
$
$
The changes to landfill and environmental remediation liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2021 are reflected
in the table below (in millions):
Landfill
Environmental
Remediation
December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations incurred and capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Obligations settled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions in estimates and interest rate assumptions (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions, divestitures and other adjustments (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2,156 $
117
(101)
108
33
13
2,326 $
230
—
(22)
3
2
—
213
(a) The amount reported for our landfill liabilities includes an increase of $15 million due to a business decision to
accelerate the closure timing of a landfill in our West Tier segment, which resulted in the acceleration of the expected
timing of capping, closure and post-closure activities. The remaining increase relates to revisions in estimated costs
and timing of capping, closure and post-closure liabilities.
(b) The amount reported for our landfill liabilities includes an increase of $13 million related to changes in the fair values
assigned to certain acquired Advanced Disposal sites.
Our recorded liabilities as of December 31, 2021 include the impacts of inflating certain of these costs based on our
expectations of the timing of cash settlement and of discounting certain of these costs to present value. Anticipated
90
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
payments of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities, as measured in current dollars, are $29 million
in 2022, $47 million in 2023, $35 million in 2024, $31 million in 2025, $11 million in 2026 and $54 million thereafter.
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment as of December 31 consisted of the following (in millions):
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vehicles (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Containers (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated depreciation of tangible property and equipment (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated amortization of landfill airspace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2021
2020
$
732 $
17,734
5,893
3,571
2,807
3,542
677
34,956
(10,147)
(10,390)
14,419 $
740
16,842
5,800
3,217
2,694
3,463
729
33,485
(9,645)
(9,692)
14,148
(a) In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, our accumulated depreciation and gross
property and equipment balances as of December 31, 2020 were overstated. We subsequently corrected the balances
in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and have provided the corrected balances
in all filings thereafter, as discussed in Note 1.
Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization expense for assets recorded as financing leases,
consisted of the following for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Depreciation of tangible property and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of landfill airspace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
1,125 $
731
1,856 $
2020
996
568
1,564
$
$
2019
893
575
1,468
$
$
See Note 5 for information regarding amortization of our intangible assets.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill was $9,028 million and $8,994 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $34 million
increase in goodwill during 2021 is primarily related to acquisitions, partially offset by divestitures. As discussed in Note 2,
we perform our annual impairment test of goodwill balances for our reporting units using a measurement date of October 1.
We will also perform interim tests if an impairment indicator exists. See Notes 11, 17 and 19 for additional information
related to goodwill.
91
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Our other intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Covenants Licenses,
Customer
and Supplier
Relationships Compete and Other
Permits
Not-to-
Total
2021
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Accumulated amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
$
1,355
(538)
817
1,436
(497)
939
$
$
$
$
43 $
(26)
17 $
142
(78)
64
$ 1,540
(642)
898
$
68 $
(46)
22 $
142
(79)
63
$ 1,646
(622)
$ 1,024
Amortization expense for other intangible assets was $143 million, $107 million and $106 million for 2021, 2020 and
2019, respectively. Amortization expense for other intangible assets for 2021 increased, as compared with 2020 and 2019,
due to the amortization of acquired intangible assets related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. Additional
information related to other intangible assets acquired through business combinations is included in Note 17. As of
December 31, 2021, we had $19 million of licenses, permits and other intangible assets that are not subject to amortization
because they do not have stated expirations or have routine, administrative renewal processes. As of December 31, 2021,
we expect annual amortization expense related to other intangible assets to be $130 million in 2022, $115 million in 2023,
$105 million in 2024, $97 million in 2025 and $77 million in 2026.
6. Debt
The following table summarizes the major components of debt as of each balance sheet date (in millions) and provides
the maturities and interest rate ranges of each major category as of December 31:
Commercial paper program (weighted average interest rate of 0.4% as of December 31, 2021
and December 31, 2020) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
1,778
$
1,814
Senior notes, maturing through 2050, interest rates ranging from 0.75% to 7.75% (weighted
average interest rate of 3.1% as of December 31, 2021 and 3.3% as of December 31, 2020) .
Canadian senior notes, C$500 million maturing September 2026, interest rate of 2.6%. . . . . . .
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing through 2048, fixed and variable interest rates ranging from
0.1% to 4.3% (weighted average interest rate of 1.4% as of December 31, 2021 and 1.7%
as of December 31, 2020) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing leases and other, maturing through 2085, weighted average interest rate of 4.5%
8,126
395
8,465
393
2,619
2,571
2021
2020
as of December 31, 2021 and 4.6% as of December 31, 2020) (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt issuance costs, discounts and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
567
(80)
13,405
708
$ 12,697
652
(85)
13,810
551
$ 13,259
(a) Excluding our landfill financing leases, the maturities of our financing leases and other debt obligations extend
through 2059.
92
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Debt Classification
As of December 31, 2021, we had $3.1 billion of debt maturing within the next 12 months, including (i) $1.8 billion
of short-term borrowings under our commercial paper program (net of related discount on issuance); (ii) $645 million of
tax-exempt bonds with term interest rate periods that expire within the next 12 months, which is prior to their scheduled
maturities; (iii) $500 million of 2.90% senior notes that mature in September 2022 and (iv) $170 million of other debt with
scheduled maturities within the next 12 months, including $71 million of tax-exempt bonds. As of December 31, 2021,
we have classified $2.4 billion of debt maturing in the next 12 months as long - term because we have the intent and ability
to refinance these borrowings on a long-term basis as supported by the forecasted available capacity under our $3.5 billion
long-term U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facility (“$3.5 billion revolving credit facility”), as discussed below. The
remaining $708 million of debt maturing in the next 12 months is classified as current obligations.
As of December 31, 2021, we also had $54 million of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds with long-term scheduled
maturities supported by letters of credit under our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility. The interest rates on our
variable - rate tax-exempt bonds reset on a weekly basis through a remarketing process. All recent tax-exempt bond
remarketings have successfully placed Company bonds with investors at market-driven rates and we currently expect
future remarketings to be successful. However, if the remarketing agent is unable to remarket our bonds, the remarketing
agent can put the bonds to us. In the event of a failed remarketing, we have the availability under our $3.5 billion revolving
credit facility to fund these bonds until they are remarketed successfully. Accordingly, we have classified the $54 million
of variable-rate tax-exempt bonds with maturities of more than one year as long-term in our Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of December 31, 2021.
Access to and Utilization of Credit Facilities and Commercial Paper Program
$3.5 Billion Revolving Credit Facility — Our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility, maturing November 2024, provides
us with credit capacity to be used for cash borrowings, to support letters of credit and to support our commercial paper
program. The agreement provides the Company with two one-year extension options. Waste Management of Canada
Corporation and WM Quebec Inc., each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of WMI, are borrowers under the $3.5 billion
revolving credit facility, and the agreement permits borrowing in Canadian dollars up to the U.S. dollar equivalent of
$375 million, with such borrowings to be repaid in Canadian dollars. WM Holdings, a wholly-owned subsidiary of WMI,
guarantees all the obligations under the $3.5 billion revolving credit facility.
The rates we pay for outstanding U.S. or Canadian loans are generally based on LIBOR (or a LIBOR successor rate,
if applicable, as provided for in the underlying credit agreement) or CDOR, respectively, plus a spread depending on the
Company’s debt rating assigned by Moody’s Investors Service and Standard and Poor’s. As of December 31, 2021, we
had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. We had $167 million of letters of credit issued and $1.8 billion of
outstanding borrowings (net of related discount on issuance) under our commercial paper program, both supported by this
facility, leaving unused and available credit capacity of $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2021.
Commercial Paper Program — We have a commercial paper program that enables us to borrow funds for up to 397
days at competitive interest rates. The rates we pay for outstanding borrowings are based on the term of the notes. The
commercial paper program is fully supported by our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2021, we
had $1.8 billion of outstanding borrowings (net of related discount on issuance) under our commercial paper program.
Other Letter of Credit Lines — As of December 31, 2021, we had utilized $764 million of other uncommitted letter
of credit lines with terms maturing through April 2023.
93
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Debt Borrowings and Repayments
Commercial Paper Program — During the year ended December 31, 2021 we made cash repayments of $6.9 billion,
which were partially offset by $6.8 billion of cash borrowings (net of related discount on issuance).
Senior Notes — In May 2021, WMI issued $950 million of senior notes consisting of $475 million of 2.00% senior
notes due June 1, 2029 and $475 million of 2.95% senior notes due June 1, 2041. The net proceeds from these debt
issuances were $942 million, all of which were used, along with available cash on hand, to retire $1.3 billion of certain
high-coupon senior notes. The cash paid included the principal amount of the debt retired, $211 million of related
premiums and other third-party costs, and $15 million of accrued interest.
During the second quarter of 2021, we recognized a $220 million loss on early extinguishment of debt in our
Consolidated Statement of Operations related to the tender offer, including $211 million of premiums and other third-party
costs and $9 million primarily related to unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs. We also recognized $6 million of
charges to interest expense for the write-off of cash flow hedges associated with the tendered notes, which was previously
being amortized to interest expense through the notes’ stated maturities. The following table summarizes the principal
amount of senior notes redeemed within each series in order of acceptance priority level (in millions):
Description
6.125% WMI senior notes due 2039 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.75% WMI senior notes due 2032 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.375% WMI senior notes due 2029 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.15% WMI senior notes due 2049 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.10% WMI senior notes due 2045 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.90% WMI senior notes due 2035 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.00% WMI senior notes due 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.10% WM Holdings senior notes due 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.50% WMI senior notes due 2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.125% WMI senior notes due 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.15% WMI senior notes due 2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.90% WMI senior notes due 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.40% WMI senior notes due 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
Principal
Outstanding
Prior to Tender
Notes Tendered
and Redeemed
$
252
153
81
1,000
750
450
330
249
350
600
750
500
500
5,965
6
9
—
316
334
153
73
26
194
178
—
—
—
1,289
Tax-Exempt Bonds — We issued $175 million of new tax-exempt bonds in 2021. The proceeds from the issuance of
these bonds were deposited directly into a restricted trust fund and may only be used for the specific purpose for which
the money was raised, which is generally to finance expenditures for solid waste disposal facility and material recovery
facility construction and development. In 2021, we also elected to refund and reissue $50 million of tax-exempt bonds and
we repaid $127 million of our tax-exempt bonds with available cash at their scheduled maturities.
Financing Leases and Other — The decrease during 2021 is due to $115 million of cash repayments of debt at
maturity, partially offset by an increase of $30 million primarily associated with non-cash financing leases.
Scheduled Debt Payments
Principal payments of our debt for the next five years and thereafter, based on scheduled maturities are as follows:
$2,449 million in 2022, $651 million in 2023, $249 million in 2024, $1,278 million in 2025, $677 million in 2026 and
$8,275 million thereafter. Our recorded debt and financing lease obligations include non-cash adjustments associated with
94
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
debt issuance costs, discounts and fair value adjustments attributable to terminated interest rate derivatives, which have
been excluded from these amounts because they will not result in cash payments. See Note 7 below for further discussion
of our financing lease arrangements.
Secured Debt
Our debt balances are generally unsecured, except for financing leases and the notes payable associated with our
investments in low-income housing properties. See Notes 8 and 18 for additional information related to these investments.
Debt Covenants
The terms of certain of our financing arrangements require that we comply with financial and other covenants. Our
most restrictive financial covenant is the one contained in our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility, which sets forth a
maximum total debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio (the “Leverage
Ratio”). This covenant requires that the Leverage Ratio for the preceding four fiscal quarters will not be more than
3.75 to 1, provided that if an acquisition permitted under the $3.5 billion revolving credit facility involving aggregate
consideration in excess of $200 million occurs during the fiscal quarter, the Company shall have the right to increase the
Leverage Ratio to 4.25 to 1 during such fiscal quarter and for the following three fiscal quarters (the “Elevated Leverage
Ratio Period”). There shall be no more than two Elevated Leverage Ratio Periods during the term of the $3.5 billion
revolving credit facility, and the Leverage Ratio must return to 3.75 to 1 for at least one fiscal quarter between Elevated
Leverage Ratio Periods. The Company did not elect to increase the Leverage Ratio for an Elevated Leverage Ratio Period
following the acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The calculation of all components used in the Leverage Ratio covenant
are as defined in the $3.5 billion revolving credit facility.
Our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility, senior notes and other financing arrangements also contain certain
restrictions on the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness as well as restrictions on the
ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur liens; engage in sale-leaseback transactions and
engage in mergers and consolidations. We monitor our compliance with these restrictions, but do not believe that they
significantly impact our ability to enter into investing or financing arrangements typical for our business. As of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under our financing arrangements
that may have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
7. Leases
Our operating lease activities primarily consist of leases for real estate, landfills and operating equipment. Our
financing lease activities primarily consist of leases for operating equipment, railcars and landfill assets. Leases with an
initial term of 12 months or less, which are not expected to be renewed beyond one year, are not recorded on the balance
sheet and are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Most leases include one or more
options to renew, with renewal terms generally ranging from one to 10 years. The exercise of lease renewal options is
generally at our sole discretion. We include the renewal term in the calculation of the right-of-use asset and related lease
liability when such renewals are reasonably certain of being exercised. Certain leases also include options to purchase the
leased property. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements is limited by the expected lease term, unless
there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Certain of our lease agreements include rental
payments based on usage and other lease agreements include rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation; these
95
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
payments are treated as variable lease payments. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value
guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
When the implicit interest rate is not readily available for our leases, we discount future cash flows of the remaining
lease payments using the current interest rate that would be paid to borrow on collateralized debt over a similar term, or
incremental borrowing rate, at the commencement date.
Supplemental balance sheet information for our leases as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
Leases
Classification
2021
2020
Assets
Long-term:
Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets
Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization
Total lease assets . . . . . . .
Liabilities
Current:
Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued liabilities
Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term:
Operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other liabilities
Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total lease liabilities . . . .
Long-term debt, less current portion
$
$
$
$
451
$
364
815
64
47
459
291
861
$
$
$
466
386
852
63
50
453
314
880
Operating lease expense was $155 million, $140 million and $132 million during 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively,
and is included in operating and selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Financing lease expense was $58 million, $51 million and $48 million during 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and is
included in depreciation and amortization expense and interest expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Minimum contractual obligations for our leases (undiscounted) as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in millions):
Operating
Financing
2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total undiscounted lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discounted lease liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
$
75
68
61
51
42
410
707
(184)
523
$
$
$
55
50
44
40
36
209
434
(96)
338
96
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Cash paid during 2021 for our operating and financing leases was $70 million and $64 million, respectively.
During 2021, right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations for our operating and financing leases were
$69 million and $36 million, respectively. Cash paid during 2020 for our operating and financing leases was $91 million
and $51 million, respectively. During 2020, right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations for our operating
and financing leases were $128 million and $35 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2021, the weighted average remaining lease terms of our operating and financing leases were
approximately 20 years and 15 years, respectively. The weighted average discount rates used to determine the lease
liabilities as of December 31, 2021 for our operating and financing leases were approximately 2.8% and 3.5%,
respectively.
8. Income Taxes
Income Tax Expense
Our income tax expense consisted of the following for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Current:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
Deferred:
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
2021
2020
2019
436 $
132
41
609
(55)
(22)
—
(77)
532 $
114
91
27
232
149
10
6
165
397
$
$
204
94
36
334
94
8
(2)
100
434
The U.S. federal statutory income tax rate is reconciled to the effective income tax rate for the year ended
December 31 as follows:
Income tax expense at U.S. federal statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxing authority audit settlements and other tax adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax impact of equity-based compensation transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax impact of impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax rate differential on foreign income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effective income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
21.00 %
4.14
(2.69)
0.53
(0.60)
(0.29)
0.37
0.16
22.62 %
2020
21.00 %
4.46
(3.78)
(0.17)
(1.12)
(0.35)
0.33
0.57
20.94 %
2019
21.00 %
4.39
(4.38)
(0.74)
(0.91)
0.72
0.40
0.13
20.61 %
The comparability of our income tax expense for the reported periods has been primarily affected by (i) variations in
our income before income taxes; (ii) federal tax credits; (iii) excess tax benefits associated with equity-based compensation
transactions; (iv) the realization of state net operating losses and credits; (v) tax audit settlements; (vi) adjustments to our
accruals and deferred taxes; (vii) the tax implications of divestitures; (viii) non - deductible transaction costs and (ix) the
tax implications of impairments.
97
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes by source for the year ended December 31 was as
follows (in millions):
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
2,211 $
138
2,349 $
2021
2020
1,780
113
1,893
2019
2,025
80
2,105
$
$
Investments Qualifying for Federal Tax Credits — We have significant financial interests in entities established to
invest in and manage low-income housing properties. We support the operations of these entities in exchange for a pro - rata
share of the tax credits they generate. The low-income housing investments qualify for federal tax credits that we expect
to realize through 2030 under Section 42 or Section 45D of the Internal Revenue Code. We also held a residual financial
interest in an entity that owned a refined coal facility that qualified for federal tax credits under Section 45 of the Internal
Revenue Code through 2019. The entity sold the majority of its assets in the first quarter of 2020, which resulted in a
$7 million non-cash impairment of our investment at that time. We account for our investments in these entities using the
equity method of accounting, recognizing our share of each entity’s results of operations and other reductions in the value
of our investments in equity in net losses of unconsolidated entities within our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized net losses of $51 million, $73 million
(including the $7 million impairment of the refined coal facility noted above) and $46 million, respectively, and a reduction
in our income tax expense of $74 million, $87 million and $96 million, respectively, primarily due to tax credits realized
from these investments as well as the tax benefits from the pre-tax losses realized. See Note 18 for additional information
related to these unconsolidated variable interest entities.
Other Federal Tax Credits — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized federal tax credits in addition to the tax
credits realized from our investments in low-income housing properties and the refined coal facility, resulting in a
reduction in our income tax expense of $5 million, $7 million and $11 million, respectively.
Equity-Based Compensation — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized excess tax benefits related to the vesting
or exercise of equity-based compensation awards resulting in a reduction in our income tax expense of $18 million,
$27 million and $25 million, respectively.
State Net Operating Losses and Credits — During 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized state net operating losses and
credits resulting in a reduction in our income tax expense of $15 million, $12 million and $14 million, respectively.
Tax Audit Settlements — We file income tax returns in the U.S. and Canada, as well as other state and local
jurisdictions. We are currently under audit by various taxing authorities, as discussed below, and our audits are in various
stages of completion. During the reported periods, we settled various tax audits which resulted in a reduction in our income
tax expense of $13 million, $10 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019,
respectively.
We participate in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Process, which means we work with the IRS throughout the year
towards resolving any material issues prior to the filing of our annual tax return. Any unresolved issues as of the tax return
filing date are subject to routine examination procedures. We are currently in the examination phase of IRS audits for the
2017, 2020 and 2021 tax years and expect these audits to be completed within the next 15 months. We are also currently
undergoing audits by various state and local jurisdictions for tax years that date back to 2014.
Adjustments to Accruals and Related Deferred Taxes — Adjustments to our accruals and related deferred taxes
primarily due to the filing of our income tax returns, analysis of our deferred tax balances and uncertain tax positions, and
98
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
changes in state and foreign laws resulted in an increase in our income tax expense of $17 million for the year ended
December 31, 2021, and a reduction in our income tax expense of $3 million and $22 million for the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Tax Implications of Divestitures – During 2021, we recognized a pre-tax gain from the recognition of cumulative
translation adjustments on the divestiture of certain non-strategic Canadian operations. This gain was not taxable, which
resulted in a reduction in our income tax expense of $8 million.
Non-Deductible Transaction Costs — During 2020 and 2019, we recognized the detrimental tax impact of $27 million
and $10 million, respectively, of non - deductible transaction costs related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal. The
tax rules require the capitalization of certain facilitative costs on the acquisition of stock of a company resulting in the
applicable costs not being deductible for tax purposes.
Tax Implications of Impairments — Portions of the impairment charges recognized during 2019 were not deductible
for tax purposes resulting in an increase in income tax expense of $15 million. The non-cash impairment charges
recognized during 2021 and 2020 were deductible for tax purposes. See Note 11 for more information related to our
impairment charges.
Unremitted Earnings in Foreign Subsidiaries — In the third quarter of 2020, we modified our permanent reinvestment
assertion and began providing additional income taxes for the undistributed current year earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries. No additional income taxes have been provided for any remaining undistributed foreign earnings prior to
2020 not subject to the one-time, mandatory transition tax, or any additional outside basis difference, as these amounts
continue to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations.
Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)
The components of net deferred tax liabilities as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carry-forwards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill and environmental remediation liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous and other reserves, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities:
$
2021
2020(a)
189 $
238
135
113
675
(158)
186
202
141
103
632
(150)
Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill and other intangibles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease right-of-use assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(1,064)
(1,027)
(120)
(1,694) $
(1,137)
(1,027)
(124)
(1,806)
(a) We have revised the classification between components of the net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2020 in
order to present the balances on a comparative basis with the classification as of December 31, 2021. These
classification revisions were made as we finalized the integration of the Advanced Disposal tax processes.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $11 million of federal net operating loss carry-forwards with expiration dates
through 2026 and $2.7 billion of state net operating loss carry-forwards with expiration dates through 2041. We also had
$47 million of federal capital loss carry-forwards with expiration dates through 2025, $38 million of foreign tax credit
99
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
carry-forwards with expiration dates through 2031 and $12 million of state tax credit carry-forwards with expiration dates
through 2037.
We have established valuation allowances for uncertainties in realizing the benefit of certain tax loss and credit
carry - forwards and other deferred tax assets. While we expect to realize the deferred tax assets, net of the valuation
allowances, changes in estimates of future taxable income or in tax laws may alter this expectation.
Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest,
is as follows (in millions):
Balance as of January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions based on tax positions of prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lapse of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
37 $
22
18
3
(12)
(4)
64 $
40
5
—
2
—
(10)
37
$
$
36
5
—
2
—
(3)
40
2021
2020
2019
These liabilities are included as a component of other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets because
the Company does not anticipate that settlement of the liabilities will require payment of cash within the next 12 months.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $53 million of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized in future periods, would
impact our effective income tax rate.
We recognize interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in our income tax expense, which was not material
for the reported periods. We did not have any material accrued liabilities or expense for penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits for the reported periods.
9. Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Plans — Waste Management sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan that covers employees,
except those working subject to collective bargaining agreements that do not provide for coverage under the plan.
U.S. employees who are not subject to such collective bargaining agreements are generally eligible to participate in the
plan following a 90-day waiting period after hire and may contribute as much as 50% of their eligible annual compensation
and 80% of their annual incentive plan bonus, subject to annual contribution limitations established by the IRS. Under the
retirement savings plan, for non-union employees, we match 100% of employee contributions on the first 3% of their
eligible annual compensation and 50% of employee contributions on the next 3% of their eligible annual compensation,
resulting in a maximum match of 4.5% of eligible annual compensation. Non-union employees are automatically enrolled
in the plan at a 3% contribution rate upon eligibility. Both employee and Company contributions are in cash and vest
immediately. Certain U.S. employees who are subject to collective bargaining agreements may participate in the
401(k) retirement savings plan under terms specified in their collective bargaining agreement. Certain employees outside
the U.S., including those in Canada, participate in defined contribution plans maintained by the Company in compliance
with laws of the appropriate jurisdiction. Charges to operating and selling, general and administrative expenses for our
defined contribution plans totaled $104 million, $92 million and $88 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020
and 2019, respectively.
100
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Defined Benefit Plans (other than multiemployer defined benefit pension plans discussed below) — WM Holdings
sponsors a defined benefit plan for certain employees who are subject to collective bargaining agreements that provide for
participation in this plan. Further, certain of our Canadian subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit plans that are frozen to new
participants. As of December 31, 2021, the combined benefit obligation of these pension plans was $150 million supported
by $150 million of combined plan assets. As of December 31, 2020, the combined benefit obligation of these pension
plans was $154 million supported by $150 million of combined plan assets, resulting in an aggregate unfunded benefit
obligation for these plans of $4 million.
In addition, WM Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries provided post-retirement health care and other benefits to
eligible retirees. In conjunction with our acquisition of WM Holdings in July 1998, we limited participation in these plans
to participating retirees as of December 31, 1998. The unfunded benefit obligation for these plans was $12 million and
$14 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Our accrued benefit liabilities for our defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans are included as
components of accrued liabilities and long-term other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans — We are a participating employer in a number of trustee-managed
multiemployer defined benefit pension plans (“Multiemployer Pension Plans”) for employees who are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. The risks of participating in these Multiemployer Pension Plans are different from
single-employer plans in that (i) assets contributed to the Multiemployer Pension Plan by one employer may be used to
provide benefits to employees or former employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops
contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be required to be assumed by the remaining participating
employers and (iii) if we choose to stop participating in any of our Multiemployer Pension Plans, we may be required to
pay those plans a withdrawal amount based on the underfunded status of the plan. The following table outlines our
participation in Multiemployer Pension Plans considered to be individually significant (dollars in millions):
Pension Fund
Automotive Industries Pension Plan . . . . . . . . . . EIN: 94-1133245;
Plan Number: 001
EIN: 36-6140097;
Plan Number: 001
Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust
EIN/Pension Plan
Number
Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois
Pension Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EIN: 36-6155778;
Plan Number: 001
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension
Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EIN: 91-6145047;
Plan Number: 001
Contributions to other Multiemployer Pension
Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total contributions to Multiemployer Pension
Plans (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension Protection Act
Reported Status(a)
2021
2020
Critical and
Critical and
Declining
Declining
Not
Not
Endangered
Endangered
or Critical
or Critical
as of
as of
3/31/2020
3/31/2021
Not
Not
Endangered
Endangered
or Critical
or Critical
Not
Not
Endangered
Endangered
or Critical
or Critical
FIP/RP
Status(b)(c)
Implemented $
Implemented
Company
Contributions(d)
2020
2019
2021
Expiration Date
of Collective
Bargaining
Agreement(s)
1 $
1 $
1
9/30/2021
2
2
2 Various dates
through
4/30/2026
3 Various dates
through
11/28/2025
32 Various dates
through
5/31/2026
Implemented
4
3
Not
Applicable
35
33
$
$
42
$
39 $
19
15
61
$
54 $
38
14
52
(a) Unless otherwise noted in the table above, the most recent Pension Protection Act zone status available in 2021 and
2020 is for the plan’s year-end as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The zone status is based on
information that we received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. As defined in the Pension Protection
Act of 2006, among other factors, plans reported as critical are generally less than 65% funded and plans reported as
endangered are generally less than 80% funded. Under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014, a plan is
generally in critical and declining status if it (i) is certified to be in critical status pursuant to the Pension Protection
Act of 2006 and (ii) is projected to be insolvent within the next 15 years or, in certain circumstances, 20 years.
101
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(b) The “FIP/RP Status” column indicates plans for which a Funding Improvement Plan (“FIP”) or a Rehabilitation Plan
(“RP”) has been implemented.
(c) A Multiemployer Pension Plan that has been certified as endangered, seriously endangered or critical may begin to
levy a statutory surcharge on contribution rates. Once authorized, the surcharge is at the rate of 5% for the first
12 months and 10% for any periods thereafter. Contributing employers, however, may eliminate the surcharge by
entering into a collective bargaining agreement that meets the requirements of the applicable FIP or RP.
(d) Of the Multiemployer Pension Plans considered to be individually significant, the Company was listed in the
Form 5500 of the Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Pension Plan as providing more than 5% of the total
contributions for plan years ending December 31, 2020 and 2019.
(e) Total contributions to Multiemployer Pension Plans excludes contributions related to withdrawal liabilities discussed
below.
Our portion of the projected benefit obligation, plan assets and unfunded liability for the Multiemployer Pension Plans
is not material to our financial position. However, the failure of participating employers to remain solvent could affect our
portion of the plans’ unfunded liability. Specific benefit levels provided by union pension plans are not negotiated with or
known by the employer contributors.
In connection with our ongoing renegotiations of various collective bargaining agreements, we may discuss and
negotiate for the complete or partial withdrawal from one or more of these pension plans. Further, business events, such
as the discontinuation or nonrenewal of a customer contract, the decertification of a union, or relocation, reduction or
discontinuance of certain operations, which result in the decline of Company contributions to a Multiemployer Pension
Plan could trigger a partial or complete withdrawal. In the event of a withdrawal, we may incur expenses associated with
our obligations for unfunded vested benefits at the time of the withdrawal. Refer to Note 10 for additional information
related to our obligations to Multiemployer Pension Plans for which we have withdrawn or partially withdrawn.
Multiemployer Plan Benefits Other Than Pensions — During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the
Company made contributions of $51 million, $48 million and $45 million, respectively, to multiemployer health and
welfare plans that also provide other post-retirement employee benefits. Funding of benefit payments for plan participants
are made at negotiated rates in the respective collective bargaining agreements as costs are incurred.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Financial Instruments — We have obtained letters of credit, surety bonds and insurance policies and have established
trust funds and issued financial guarantees to support tax-exempt bonds, contracts, performance of landfill final capping,
closure and post-closure requirements, environmental remediation and other obligations. Letters of credit generally are
supported by our $3.5 billion revolving credit facility and other letter of credit lines established for that purpose. These
facilities are discussed further in Note 6. Surety bonds and insurance policies are supported by (i) a diverse group of
third - party surety and insurance companies; (ii) an entity in which we have a noncontrolling financial interest or (iii) a
wholly-owned insurance captive, the sole business of which is to issue surety bonds and/or insurance policies on our
behalf.
Management does not expect that any claims against or draws on these instruments would have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We have not experienced any unmanageable difficulty
in obtaining the required financial assurance instruments for our current operations. In an ongoing effort to mitigate risks
of future cost increases and reductions in available capacity, we continue to evaluate various options to access
cost - effective sources of financial assurance.
102
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Insurance — We carry insurance coverage for protection of our assets and operations from certain risks including
general liability, automobile liability, workers’ compensation, real and personal property, directors’ and officers’ liability,
pollution legal liability, cyber incident liability and other coverages we believe are customary to the industry. Our exposure
to loss for insurance claims is generally limited to the per-incident deductible under the related insurance policy. Our
exposure could increase if our insurers are unable to meet their commitments on a timely basis.
We have retained a significant portion of the risks related to our health and welfare, general liability, automobile
liability and workers’ compensation claims programs. “General liability” refers to the self-insured portion of specific
third - party claims made against us that may be covered under our commercial general liability insurance policy. For our
self - insured portions, the exposure for unpaid claims and associated expenses, including incurred but not reported losses,
is based on an actuarial valuation or internal estimates. The accruals for these liabilities could be revised if future
occurrences or loss development significantly differ from such valuations and estimates. We use a wholly-owned insurance
captive to insure the deductibles for our general liability, automobile liability and workers’ compensation claims programs.
As of December 31, 2021, both our commercial general liability insurance policy and our workers’ compensation
insurance program carried self-insurance exposures of up to $5 million per incident. As of December 31, 2021, our
automobile liability insurance program included a per-incident deductible of up to $10 million. Our receivable balance
associated with insurance claims was $155 million and $139 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively. The
changes to our insurance reserves for the year ended December 31 are summarized below (in millions):
Balance as of January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Self-insurance expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Current portion as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Long-term portion as of December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
2021(a)
664
240
(170)
—
734
191
543
2020
575
172
(151)
68
664
175
489
$
$
$
$
(a) Based on current estimates, we anticipate that most of our insurance reserves will be settled in cash over the next six
years.
(b) Insurance reserves of $68 million as of December 31, 2020 related to the acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
We do not expect the impact of any known casualty, property, environmental or other contingency to have a material
impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Unconditional Purchase Obligations — Our unconditional purchase obligations are generally established in the
ordinary course of our business and are structured in a manner that provides us with access to important resources at
competitive, market-driven rates and consist primarily of the following:
Disposal — We have several agreements expiring at various dates through 2052 that require us to dispose of a
minimum number of tons at third-party disposal facilities. Under these put-or-pay agreements, we are required to
pay for the agreed upon minimum volumes regardless of the actual number of tons placed at the facilities. We
generally fulfill our minimum contractual obligations by disposing of volumes collected in the ordinary course
of business at these disposal facilities.
Other — We are party to certain multi-year service agreements expiring at various dates through 2030 requiring
minimum annual payments.
As of December 31, 2021, our estimated minimum obligations associated with unconditional purchase obligations,
which are not recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $197 million in 2022, $182 million in 2023,
103
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
$130 million in 2024, $105 million in 2025, $95 million in 2026 and $368 million thereafter. We may also establish
unconditional purchase obligations in conjunction with acquisitions or divestitures. Our actual future minimum obligations
under these outstanding purchase agreements are generally quantity driven and, as a result, our associated financial
obligations are not fixed as of December 31, 2021. For contracts that require us to purchase minimum quantities of goods
or services, we have estimated our future minimum obligations based on the current market values of the underlying
products or services or contractually stated amounts. We currently expect the products and services provided by these
agreements to continue to meet the needs of our ongoing operations. Therefore, we do not expect these established
arrangements to materially impact our future financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other Commitments
Royalties — We have various arrangements that require us to make royalty payments to third parties including
prior land owners, lessors or host communities where our operations are located. Our obligations generally are
based on per ton rates for waste actually received at our transfer stations or landfills. Royalty agreements that are
non-cancelable and require fixed or minimum payments are included in our financing leases and other debt
obligations in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as disclosed in Note 6.
Guarantees — We have entered into the following guarantee agreements associated with our operations:
As of December 31, 2021, WM Holdings has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of WMI’s senior
indebtedness, including its senior notes, $3.5 billion revolving credit facility and certain letter of credit lines,
which mature through 2050. WMI has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the senior indebtedness of WM
Holdings, which matures in 2026. Performance under these guarantee agreements would be required if either
party defaulted on their respective obligations. No additional liabilities have been recorded for these intercompany
guarantees because all of the underlying obligations are reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
WMI and WM Holdings have guaranteed subsidiary debt obligations, including tax-exempt bonds, financing
leases and other indebtedness. If a subsidiary fails to meet its obligations associated with its debt agreements as
they come due, WMI or WM Holdings will be required to perform under the related guarantee agreement.
No additional liabilities have been recorded for these intercompany guarantees because all of the underlying
obligations are reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 6 for information related to the balances
and maturities of these debt obligations.
Certain of our subsidiaries have guaranteed the market or contractually-determined value of certain homeowners’
properties that are adjacent to or near certain of our landfills. These guarantee agreements extend over the life of
the respective landfill. Under these agreements, we would be responsible for the difference, if any, between the
sale value and the guaranteed market or contractually-determined value of the homeowners’ properties. As of
December 31, 2021, we have agreements guaranteeing certain market value losses for certain properties adjacent
to or near 18 of our landfills. Any liability associated with the triggering of the home value has been reflected in
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We do not believe that the remaining contingent obligations will have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We have indemnified the purchasers of businesses or divested assets for the occurrence of specified events under
certain of our divestiture agreements. Other than certain identified items that are currently recorded as obligations,
we do not believe that it is possible to determine the contingent obligations associated with these indemnities.
Additionally, under certain of our acquisition agreements, we have provided for additional consideration to be
paid to the sellers if established financial targets or other market conditions are achieved post-closing and we
have recognized liabilities for these contingent obligations based on an estimate of the fair value of these
contingencies at the time of acquisition. We do not currently believe that contingent obligations to provide
indemnification or pay additional post-closing consideration in connection with our divestitures or acquisitions
will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
104
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
WMI and WM Holdings guarantee the service, lease, financial and general operating obligations of certain of
their subsidiaries. If such a subsidiary fails to meet its contractual obligations as they come due, the guarantor has
an unconditional obligation to perform on its behalf. No additional liability has been recorded for service,
financial or general operating guarantees because the subsidiaries’ obligations are properly accounted for as costs
of operations as services are provided or general operating obligations as incurred. No additional liability has
been recorded for the lease guarantees because the subsidiaries’ obligations are properly accounted for as
operating or financing leases, as appropriate.
Environmental Matters — A significant portion of our operating costs and capital expenditures could be characterized
as costs of environmental protection. The nature of our operations, particularly with respect to the construction, operation
and maintenance of our landfills, subjects us to an array of laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. Under current laws and regulations, we may have liabilities for environmental damage caused by our
operations, or for damage caused by conditions that existed before we acquired a site. In addition to remediation activity
required by state or local authorities, such liabilities include PRP investigations. The costs associated with these liabilities
can include settlements, certain legal and consultant fees, as well as incremental internal and external costs directly
associated with site investigation and clean-up.
As of December 31, 2021, we have been notified by the government that we are a PRP in connection with 73 locations
listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA’s”) Superfund National Priorities List (“NPL”). Of the 73 sites at
which claims have been made against us, 14 are sites we own. Each of the NPL sites we own was initially developed by
others as a landfill disposal facility. At each of these facilities, we are working in conjunction with the government to
evaluate or remediate identified site problems, and we have either agreed with other legally liable parties on an arrangement
for sharing the costs of remediation or are working toward a cost-sharing agreement. We generally expect to receive any
amounts due from other participating parties at or near the time that we make the remedial expenditures. The other 59 NPL
sites, which we do not own, are at various procedural stages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, known as CERCLA or Superfund.
The majority of proceedings involving NPL sites that we do not own are based on allegations that certain of our
subsidiaries (or their predecessors) transported hazardous substances to the sites, often prior to our acquisition of these
subsidiaries. CERCLA generally provides for liability for those parties owning, operating, transporting to or disposing at
the sites. Proceedings arising under Superfund typically involve numerous waste generators and other waste transportation
and disposal companies and seek to allocate or recover costs associated with site investigation and remediation, which
costs could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. At some of
the sites at which we have been identified as a PRP, our liability is well defined as a consequence of a governmental
decision and an agreement among liable parties as to the share each will pay for implementing that remedy. At other sites,
where no remedy has been selected or the liable parties have been unable to agree on an appropriate allocation, our future
costs are uncertain.
On October 11, 2017, the EPA issued its Record of Decision (“ROD”) with respect to the previously proposed
remediation plan for the San Jacinto waste pits in Harris County, Texas. McGinnes Industrial Maintenance Corporation
(“MIMC”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of WMI, operated some of the waste pits from 1965 to 1966 and has been
named as a site PRP. In 1998, WMI acquired the stock of the parent entity of MIMC. MIMC has been working with the
EPA and other named PRPs as the process of addressing the site proceeds. On April 9, 2018, MIMC and International
Paper Company entered into an Administrative Order on Consent agreement with the EPA to develop a remedial design
for the EPA’s proposed remedy for the site. Allocation of responsibility among the PRPs for the proposed remedy has not
been established. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the recorded liability for MIMC’s estimated potential share of the
EPA’s proposed remedy and related costs was $53 million and $55 million, respectively. MIMC’s ultimate liability could
be materially different from current estimates.
105
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Item 103 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a governmental
authority is a party to the proceedings, or such proceedings are known to be contemplated, unless we reasonably believe
that the matter will result in no monetary sanctions, or in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, below a stated
threshold. In accordance with this SEC regulation, the Company uses a threshold of $1 million for purposes of determining
whether disclosure of any such environmental proceedings is required. As of the date of this filing, we are not aware of
any matters that are required to be disclosed pursuant to this standard.
From time to time, we are also named as defendants in personal injury and property damage lawsuits, including
purported class actions, on the basis of having owned, operated or transported waste to a disposal facility that is alleged to
have contaminated the environment or, in certain cases, on the basis of having conducted environmental remediation
activities at sites. Some of the lawsuits may seek to have us pay the costs of monitoring of allegedly affected sites and
health care examinations of allegedly affected persons for a substantial period of time even where no actual damage is
proven. While we believe we have meritorious defenses to these lawsuits, the ultimate resolution is often substantially
uncertain due to the difficulty of determining the cause, extent and impact of alleged contamination (which may have
occurred over a long period of time), the potential for successive groups of complainants to emerge, the diversity of the
individual plaintiffs’ circumstances, and the potential contribution or indemnification obligations of co-defendants or other
third parties, among other factors. Additionally, we often enter into agreements with landowners imposing obligations on
us to meet certain regulatory or contractual conditions upon site closure or upon termination of the agreements. Compliance
with these agreements inherently involves subjective determinations and may result in disputes, including litigation.
Litigation — As a large company with operations across the U.S. and Canada, we are subject to various proceedings,
lawsuits, disputes and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Many of these actions raise complex factual
and legal issues and are subject to uncertainties. Actions that have been filed against us, and that may be filed against us
in the future, include personal injury, property damage, commercial, customer, and employment-related claims, including
purported state and national class action lawsuits related to: alleged environmental contamination, including releases of
hazardous material and odors; sales and marketing practices, customer service agreements and prices and fees; and federal
and state wage and hour and other laws. The plaintiffs in some actions seek unspecified damages or injunctive relief, or
both. These actions are in various procedural stages, and some are covered in part by insurance. We currently do not
believe that the eventual outcome of any such actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
WMI’s charter and bylaws provide that WMI shall indemnify against all liabilities and expenses, and upon request
shall advance expenses to any person, who is subject to a pending or threatened proceeding because such person is or was
a director or officer of the Company. Such indemnification is required to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware
law. Accordingly, the director or officer must execute an undertaking to reimburse the Company for any fees advanced if
it is later determined that the director or officer was not permitted to have such fees advanced under Delaware law.
Additionally, the Company has direct contractual obligations to provide indemnification to each of the members of WMI’s
Board of Directors and each of WMI’s executive officers. The Company may incur substantial expenses in connection
with the fulfillment of its advancement of costs and indemnification obligations in connection with actions or proceedings
that may be brought against its former or current officers, directors and employees.
Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans — About 20% of our workforce is covered by collective bargaining
agreements with various local unions across the U.S. and Canada. As a result of some of these agreements, certain of our
subsidiaries are participating employers in a number of Multiemployer Pension Plans for the covered employees. Refer to
Note 9 for additional information about our participation in Multiemployer Pension Plans considered individually
significant. In connection with our ongoing renegotiation of various collective bargaining agreements, we may discuss and
negotiate for the complete or partial withdrawal from one or more of these Multiemployer Pension Plans. A complete or
partial withdrawal from a Multiemployer Pension Plan may also occur if employees covered by a collective bargaining
agreement vote to decertify a union from continuing to represent them. Any other circumstance resulting in a decline in
Company contributions to a Multiemployer Pension Plan through a reduction in the labor force, whether through attrition
106
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
over time or through a business event (such as the discontinuation or nonrenewal of a customer contract, the decertification
of a union, or relocation, reduction or discontinuance of certain operations) may also trigger a complete or partial
withdrawal from one or more of these pension plans.
We do not believe that any future liability relating to our past or current participation in, or withdrawals from, the
Multiemployer Pension Plans to which we contribute will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or liquidity. However, liability for future withdrawals could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or cash flows for a particular reporting period, depending on the number of employees withdrawn and the
financial condition of the Multiemployer Pension Plan(s) at the time of such withdrawal(s).
Tax Matters — We maintain a liability for uncertain tax positions, the balance of which management believes is
adequate. Results of audit assessments by taxing authorities are not currently expected to have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 8 for additional discussion regarding income taxes.
11. Asset Impairments and Unusual Items
(Gain) Loss from Divestitures, Asset Impairments and Unusual Items, Net
The following table summarizes the major components of (gain) loss from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual
items, net for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Gain from divestitures, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
2019
$
$
(44) $
8
20
(16) $
(33) $
68
—
35
$
—
42
—
42
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized net gains of $16 million primarily consisting of (i) a
$35 million pre - tax gain from the recognition of cumulative translation adjustments on the divestiture of certain
non - strategic Canadian operations in our East Tier segment and (ii) an $8 million gain from divestitures of certain ancillary
operations in our Other segment. These gains were partially offset by (i) a $20 million charge pertaining to reserves for
loss contingencies in our Corporate and Other segment and (ii) $8 million of asset impairment charges primarily related
to our WM Renewable Energy business within our Other segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized $35 million of net charges primarily related to (i) a
$33 million net gain associated with net asset divestitures executed to address requirements of the U.S. Department of
Justice in connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, primarily within our West Tier segment; (ii) $41 million
of non-cash impairment charges primarily related to two landfills and an oil field waste injection facility in our West Tier
segment; (iii) a $20 million non - cash impairment charge in our East Tier segment due to management’s decision to close
a landfill once its constructed airspace is filled and abandon any remaining permitted airspace and (iv) $7 million of net
charges primarily related to non-cash impairments of certain assets within our WM Renewable Energy business in our
Other segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized asset impairments of $42 million, related to (i) $27 million
of goodwill impairment charges within our Other segment, of which $17 million related to our EES business and
$10 million related to our LampTracker® reporting unit, and (ii) $15 million of asset impairment charges primarily related
to certain solid waste operations in our West Tier segment.
107
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
See Note 2 for additional information related to the accounting policy and analysis involved in identifying and
calculating impairments. See Note 19 for additional information related to the impact of impairments on the results of
operations of our reportable segments.
Equity in Net Losses of Unconsolidated Entities
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $7 million related to an
investment in a refined coal facility which is discussed further in Note 8. The fair value of our investment was not readily
determinable; thus, we determined the fair value using management assumptions pertaining to investment value (Level 3).
The remaining losses during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 were primarily related to our
noncontrolling interests in entities established to invest in and manage low - income housing properties. Refer to Notes 8
and 18 for additional information related to these investments.
Other, Net
In 2019, we recognized a $52 million non-cash impairment charge related to our minority - owned investment in a
waste conversion technology business. We wrote down our investment to its estimated fair value as the result of recent
third-party investor’s transactions in these securities. The fair value of our investment was not readily determinable; thus,
we determined the fair value utilizing a combination of quoted price inputs for the equity in our investment (Level 2) and
certain management assumptions pertaining to investment value (Level 3).
108
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
12. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, which
is included as a component of WMI stockholders’ equity, are as follows (in millions, with amounts in parentheses
representing decreases to accumulated other comprehensive income):
Balance, December 31, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $0, $5, $0 and $1,
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax (expense) benefit
of $3, $0, $0 and $0, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $2, $4, $0 and $1,
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax (expense) benefit
of $2, $0, $0 and $(1), respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $0, $(2), $0 and $2
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax (expense) benefit
of $3, $0, $0 and $0, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Available-
for-Sale
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Post-
Retirement
Benefit
Derivative
Instruments Securities Adjustments(a) Obligations Total
(2) $ (87)
(76) $
(32) $
23 $
$
—
15
55
2
72
8
8
(24) $
—
15
38 $
—
55
(21) $
7
(1)
79
1
(1) $ (8)
7
12
20
2
41
8
15
(9) $
(1)
11
49 $
—
20
(1) $
6
(1)
47
1
— $ 39
—
(6)
7
5
6
9
9
— $
—
(6)
43 $
(35)
(28)
(29) $
(28)
(2)
3
(22)
3 $ 17
$
$
$
(a) As a result of the divestiture of certain non-strategic Canadian operations in the third quarter of 2021, we reclassified
$35 million of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income
to gain from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual items within our Consolidated Statement of Operations.
13. Capital Stock, Dividends and Common Stock Repurchase Program
Capital Stock
We have 1.5 billion shares of authorized common stock with a par value of $0.01 per common share. As of
December 31, 2021, we had 416.1 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The Board of Directors is
authorized to issue preferred stock in series, and with respect to each series, to fix its designation, relative rights (including
voting, dividend, conversion, sinking fund, and redemption rights), preferences (including dividends and liquidation) and
limitations. We have 10 million shares of authorized preferred stock, $0.01 par value, none of which is currently
outstanding.
109
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Dividends
Our quarterly dividends have been declared by our Board of Directors. Cash dividends declared and paid were
$970 million in 2021, or $2.30 per common share, $927 million in 2020, or $2.18 per common share, and $876 million in
2019, or $2.05 per common share.
In December 2021, we announced that our Board of Directors expects to increase the quarterly dividend from
$0.575 to $0.65 per share for dividends declared in 2022. However, all future dividend declarations are at the discretion
of the Board of Directors and depend on various factors, including our net earnings, financial condition, cash required for
future business plans, growth and acquisitions and other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
The Company repurchases shares of its common stock as part of capital allocation programs authorized by our Board
of Directors. Share repurchases during the reported periods were completed through accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”)
agreements and, to a lesser extent, open market transactions. The terms of these ASR agreements required that we deliver
cash at the beginning of each ASR repurchase period. In exchange, we received a portion of the total shares expected to
be repurchased based on the then-current market price of our common stock. The remaining shares repurchased over the
course of each repurchase period are delivered to us once the repurchase period is complete. In the table below, shares
repurchased are measured and reported based on the period shares are delivered to us, which can differ from the period
cash is delivered to a repurchase agent for the value of such shares. During 2021, we allocated an aggregate of $1.35 billion
in cash under ASR agreements to repurchase shares. As of December 31, 2021, we had received 8.7 million shares with a
weighted average price per share of $146.61. In January 2022, we completed our ASR agreement executed in
December 2021, at which time we received an additional 0.4 million shares. The following is a summary of our share
repurchases under our common stock repurchase program for the year ended December 31:
Shares repurchased (in thousands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average price per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total repurchases (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021(a)
2020(b)
8,731
3,687
$ 146.61 $ 108.92
402
$
1,280 $
2019(c)
2,247
$ 108.60
244
$
(a) We executed and completed three ASR agreements during 2021 to repurchase $1.0 billion of our common stock and
received 7.0 million shares in connection with these ASR agreements.
In addition, in December 2021, we executed an ASR agreement to repurchase $350 million of our common stock. At
the beginning of the repurchase period, we delivered $350 million in cash and received 1.7 million shares based on a
stock price of $160.67. The ASR agreement completed in January 2022, at which time we received 0.4 million
additional shares based on a final weighted average price of $160.33.
(b) During 2020, we executed and completed an ASR agreement to repurchase $313 million of our common stock and
received 2.8 million shares in connection with this ASR agreement. We also repurchased an additional 0.9 million
shares of our common stock in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) for $89 million, inclusive of per-share commissions.
(c) During 2019, we executed and completed an ASR agreement to repurchase $180 million of our common stock and
received 1.6 million shares in connection with this ASR agreement. We also repurchased an additional 0.7 million
shares of our common stock in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b5-1 and Rule 10b-18 of the
Exchange Act for $64 million, inclusive of per-share commissions.
We announced in December 2021 that the Board of Directors has authorized up to $1.5 billion in future share
repurchases. Any future share repurchases will be made at the discretion of management and will depend on factors similar
110
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to those considered by the Board of Directors in making dividend declarations, including our net earnings, financial
condition and cash required for future business plans, growth and acquisitions.
14. Equity-Based Compensation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) under which employees that have been employed for at least
30 days may purchase shares of our common stock at a discount. The plan provides for two offering periods for purchases:
January through June and July through December. At the end of each offering period, enrolled employees purchase shares
of our common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of the market value of the stock on the first and last day of such
offering period. The purchases are made at the end of an offering period with funds accumulated through payroll
deductions over the course of the offering period. Subject to limitations set forth in the plan and under IRS regulations,
eligible employees may elect to have up to 10% of their base pay deducted during the offering period. The total number
of shares issued under the plan for the offering periods in 2021, 2020 and 2019 was approximately 513,000, 570,000 and
537,000, respectively. After the January 2022 issuance of shares associated with the July to December 2021 offering
period, 2.7 million shares remain available for issuance under the ESPP.
As a result of our ESPP, annual compensation expense increased by $12 million, or $9 million net of tax expense, for
2021, $13 million, or $10 million net of tax expense, for 2020 and $10 million, or $7 million net of tax expense, for 2019.
Employee Stock Incentive Plans
In May 2014, our stockholders approved our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) to replace our 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The 2014 Plan authorized 23.8 million shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant
to the 2014 Plan, plus the approximately 1.1 million shares that then remained available for issuance under the 2009 Plan,
and any shares subject to outstanding awards under both incentive plans that are subsequently cancelled, forfeited,
terminate, expire or lapse. In May 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the 2014 Plan to provide that the
number of future shares surrendered in payment of the exercise or purchase price of an award, and the number of future
shares used to satisfy the withholding obligations, shall no longer be credited back to the total number of shares available
for issuance under the 2014 Plan. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 16.9 million shares were available for future
grants under the 2014 Plan. All of our equity-based compensation awards described herein have been made pursuant to
either our 2009 Plan or our 2014 Plan, collectively referred to as the “Incentive Plans.” We currently utilize treasury shares
to meet the needs of our equity-based compensation programs.
Pursuant to the Incentive Plans, we have the ability to issue stock options, stock appreciation rights and stock awards,
including restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance share units (“PSUs”). The terms and conditions
of equity awards granted under the Incentive Plans are determined by the Management Development and Compensation
Committee of our Board of Directors.
The 2021 annual incentive plan awards granted to the Company’s senior leadership team, which generally includes
the Company’s executive officers, included a combination of PSUs and stock options. Additionally, one member of the
Company’s senior leadership team received a grant of RSUs in 2021 in special recognition of 2020 contributions. The
Incentive Plans awards granted to other eligible employees included a combination of PSUs, RSUs and stock options in
2021. The Company also periodically grants RSUs to employees working on key initiatives, in connection with new hires
and promotions and to field-based managers.
111
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Restricted Stock Units — A summary of our RSUs is presented in the table below (units in thousands):
Unvested as of January 1, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested as of December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted Average
Per Share
Fair Value
Units
331 $
140 $
(101) $
(27) $
343 $
103.84
118.11
85.59
114.18
114.28
The total fair market value of RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was
$12 million, $14 million and $15 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we issued
approximately 72,000 shares of common stock for these vested RSUs, net of approximately 29,000 units deferred or used
for payment of associated taxes.
RSUs may not be voted or sold by award recipients until time-based vesting restrictions have lapsed. RSUs primarily
provide for three-year cliff vesting and include dividend equivalents accumulated during the vesting period. Unvested
units are subject to forfeiture in the event of voluntary or for-cause termination. RSUs are generally subject to pro-rata
vesting upon an employee’s involuntary termination other than for cause and generally payout at the end of the three-year
vesting period and become immediately vested in the event of an employee’s death or disability.
Compensation expense associated with RSUs is measured based on the grant-date fair value of our common stock and
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the required employment period. Beginning in 2021, the terms of the award
agreements for new grants of RSUs were updated to provide for accelerated vesting following retirement as if the employee
had remained employed until the end of the vesting period. Accordingly, compensation expense for RSUs granted to
retirement eligible employees is recognized over the longer of (i) the period between grant date and the date that the
recipient becomes retirement-eligible or (ii) the defined service requirement of the award. Compensation expense is only
recognized for those awards that we expect to vest, which we estimate based upon an assessment of expected forfeitures.
Performance Share Units — Two types of PSUs are currently outstanding: (i) PSUs for which payout is dependent on
total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 Index (“TSR PSUs”) and (ii) PSUs for which payout is dependent on the
Company’s performance against pre-established adjusted cash flow metrics (“Cash Flow PSUs”). Both types of PSUs are
payable in shares of common stock after the end of a three-year performance period, when the Company’s financial
performance for the entire performance period is reported, typically in mid- to late-February of the succeeding year. At
the end of the performance period, the number of shares awarded can range from 0% to 200% of the targeted amount,
depending on the performance against the pre-established targets. A summary of our PSUs, at 100% of the targeted amount,
is presented in the table below (units in thousands):
Unvested as of January 1, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unvested as of December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted Average
Per Share
Fair Value
Units
999 $
336 $
(353) $
(14) $
968 $
120.95
122.59
98.45
130.49
129.60
The determination of achievement of performance results and corresponding vesting of PSUs for the three-year
performance period ended December 31, 2021 was performed by the Management Development and Compensation
112
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Committee of our Board of Directors in February 2022. Accordingly, vesting information for such awards is not included
in the table above as of December 31, 2021. The “vested” PSUs are for the three-year performance period ended
December 31, 2020, as achievement of performance results and corresponding vesting was determined in February 2021.
The performance of the Company’s common stock for purposes of the TSR PSUs exceeded target performance criteria,
and the Company’s financial results, as measured for purposes of the Cash Flow PSUs, achieved the maximum
performance criteria. Accordingly, recipients of the PSU awards received a payout of 172.84% of the vested TSR PSUs
and 200% of the vested Cash Flow PSUs. In February 2021, approximately 659,000 PSUs vested and we issued
approximately 435,000 shares of common stock for these vested PSUs, net of units deferred or used for payment of
associated taxes. The shares of common stock that were issued or deferred during the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020 and 2019 for prior PSU award grants had a fair market value of $74 million, $89 million and $84 million,
respectively.
PSUs have no voting rights. PSUs receive dividend equivalents that are paid out in cash based on the number of shares
that vest at the end of the awards’ performance period. Subject to attainment of the performance metrics described above,
PSUs are payable to an employee (or his beneficiary) upon death or disability as if that employee had remained employed
until the end of the performance period. PSUs are generally subject to pro-rata vesting upon an employee’s involuntary
termination other than for cause and are subject to forfeiture in the event of voluntary or for-cause termination. The terms
of the award agreements for outstanding PSUs provide for continued vesting following retirement as if the employee had
remained employed until the end of the performance period, and compensation expense for PSUs granted to
retirement - eligible employees is accelerated over the period that the recipient becomes retirement-eligible plus a defined
service requirement.
Compensation expense associated with our Cash Flow PSUs is based on the grant-date fair value of our common
stock. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the performance period based on our estimated achievement of
the established performance criteria. Compensation expense is only recognized for those awards that we expect to vest,
which we estimate based upon an assessment of both the probability that the performance criteria will be achieved and
expected forfeitures. The grant-date fair value of our TSR PSUs is based on a Monte Carlo valuation and compensation
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognized for all TSR
PSUs whether or not the market conditions are achieved less expected forfeitures.
Deferred Units — Certain employees can elect to defer some or all of the vested RSU or PSU awards until a specified
date or dates they choose. Deferred units are not invested, nor do they earn interest, but deferred amounts do receive
dividend equivalents paid in cash during deferral at the same time and at the same rate as dividends on the Company’s
common stock. Deferred amounts are paid out in shares of common stock at the end of the deferral period. As of
December 31, 2021, we had approximately 201,000 vested deferred units outstanding.
Stock Options — Stock options granted prior to 2021 vest in 25% increments on the first two anniversaries of the date
of grant with the remaining 50% vesting on the third anniversary. Stock options granted in 2021 vest ratably in three annual
increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The exercise price of the options is the average of the
113
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
high and low market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and the options have a term of 10 years. A summary
of our stock options is presented in the table below (options in thousands):
Weighted Average
Per Share
Outstanding as of January 1, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited or expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding as of December 31, 2021 (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable as of December 31, 2021 (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options
Exercise Price
82.86
110.81
68.89
109.50
92.53
74.08
3,543 $
661 $
(962) $
(36) $
3,206 $
1,672 $
(a) Stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2021 have a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.6 years
and an aggregate intrinsic value of $238 million based on the market value of our common stock on
December 31, 2021.
(b) Stock options exercisable as of December 31, 2021 have an aggregate intrinsic value of $155 million based on the
market value of our common stock on December 31, 2021.
We received cash proceeds of $66 million, $63 million and $67 million during the years ended December 31, 2021,
2020 and 2019, respectively, from employee stock option exercises. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options
exercised during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $66 million, $58 million and $71 million,
respectively.
Stock options exercisable as of December 31, 2021 were as follows (options in thousands):
Range of Exercise Prices
$34.94-$50.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$50.01-$70.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$70.01-$100.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$100.01-$126.01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$34.94-$126.01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options Exercise Price
$
$
$
$
$
39.29
55.52
85.15
126.01
74.08
281
405
831
155
1,672
Weighted Average
Remaining Years
1.7
3.7
6.1
8.1
5.0
Weighted Average
Per Share
All unvested stock options shall become exercisable upon the award recipient’s death or disability. In the event of a
recipient’s retirement, stock options shall continue to vest pursuant to the original schedule set forth in the award
agreement. If the recipient is terminated by the Company without cause or voluntarily resigns, the recipient shall be entitled
to exercise all stock options outstanding and exercisable within a specified time frame after such termination. All
outstanding stock options, whether exercisable or not, are forfeited upon termination for cause.
We account for our employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation
model to measure stock option expense at the date of grant. The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options
granted during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $17.25, $15.82 and $12.22, respectively. The fair
value of stock options at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the vesting period less expected forfeitures, except
for stock options granted to retirement-eligible employees, for which expense is accelerated over the period that the
114
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
recipient becomes retirement-eligible. The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to value
employee stock options granted during the year ended December 31 under the Black-Scholes valuation model:
Expected option life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
4.6 years
4.7 years
23.2 %
2.1 %
0.6 %
16.6 %
1.7 %
1.4 %
2019
4.2 years
15.5 %
2.1 %
2.5 %
The Company bases its expected option life on the expected exercise and termination behavior of its optionees and an
appropriate model of the Company’s future stock price. The expected volatility assumption is derived from the historical
volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of
the Company’s stock options, combined with other relevant factors including implied volatility in market-traded options
on the Company’s stock. The expected dividend yield is the annual rate of dividends per share over the exercise price of
the option as of the grant date.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized $94 million, $79 million and $75 million,
respectively, of compensation expense associated with RSU, PSU and stock option awards as a component of selling,
general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our income tax expense for the years
ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 includes related income tax benefits of $18 million, $15 million and
$17 million, respectively. We have not capitalized any equity-based compensation costs during the reported periods.
As of December 31, 2021, we estimate that $49 million of currently unrecognized compensation expense will be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years for our unvested RSU, PSU and stock option awards issued and
outstanding.
Non-Employee Director Plan
Our non-employee directors currently receive annual grants of shares of our common stock, generally payable in two
equal installments, under the 2014 Plan described above.
15. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed using the following common share data for the year ended
December 31 (shares in millions):
Number of common shares outstanding at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of using weighted average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive effect of equity-based compensation awards and other contingently
issuable shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potentially issuable shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of anti-dilutive potentially issuable shares excluded from diluted common
2021
416.1
4.3
420.4
2.5
422.9
5.7
2020
422.8
0.2
423.0
2.1
425.1
6.1
2019
424.3
0.3
424.6
2.9
427.5
6.7
shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.6
1.6
0.7
Refer to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc.
115
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
16. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Accounted for at Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When measuring assets and liabilities that are required
to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the Company
would transact. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure
fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available
and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 — Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
In measuring the fair value of our assets and liabilities, we use market data or assumptions that we believe market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk when appropriate. Our assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis include the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1):
Cash equivalents and money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
38 $
25
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2):
Available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
395
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Redeemable preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
49
507 $
530
—
390
49
969
2021
2020
See Note 11 for information related to our nonrecurring fair value measurements and the impact of impairments. See
Note 17 for information related to the nonrecurring fair value measurement of assets and liabilities acquired in connection
with our acquisitions.
Cash Equivalents and Money Market Funds
Cash equivalents primarily include short-term interest-bearing instruments with maturities of three months or less.
We invest portions of our restricted trust and escrow account balances in money market funds and we measure the fair
value of these investments using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The fair value of our cash equivalents
and money market funds approximates our cost basis in these instruments. The decrease in 2021 is primarily due to the
use of available cash to retire certain high-coupon senior notes in May 2021, which is discussed further in Note 6.
Equity Securities
We invest portions of our restricted trust and escrow account balances in equity securities and we measure the fair
value of these securities using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Any changes in fair value of these
116
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
securities related to unrealized gains and losses have been appropriately reflected as a component of other income
(expense).
Available-for-Sale Securities
Our available-for-sale securities include restricted trust and escrow account balances and an investment in an
unconsolidated entity, as discussed in Note 18. We invest primarily in debt securities, including U.S. Treasury securities,
U.S. agency securities, municipal securities and mortgage- and asset-backed securities, which generally mature over the
next nine years. We measure the fair value of these securities using quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive
markets. Any changes in fair value of these trusts related to unrealized gains and losses have been appropriately reflected
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Redeemable Preferred Stock
Redeemable preferred stock is related to a noncontrolling investment in an unconsolidated entity and is included in
investments in unconsolidated entities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of our investment has been
measured based on third-party investors’ recent or pending transactions in these securities, which are considered the best
evidence of fair value. When this evidence is not available, we use other valuation techniques as appropriate and available.
These valuation methodologies may include transactions in similar instruments, discounted cash flow techniques,
third - party appraisals or industry multiples and public company comparable transactions.
Fair Value of Debt
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the carrying value of our debt was $13.4 billion and $13.8 billion, respectively.
The estimated fair value of our debt was approximately $14.1 billion and $15.2 billion as of December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively. The decrease in the fair value of debt is primarily related to (i) net repayments of $456 million during 2021;
(ii) the replacement of debt balances with a relatively high fair value to carrying value ratio with new debt with a fair value
that approximates carrying value (refer to Note 6 for additional information) and (iii) increases in current market rates of
our senior notes.
Although we have determined the estimated fair value amounts using available market information and commonly
accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates
of fair value. Accordingly, our estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we, or holders of the instruments,
could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different assumptions or estimation methodologies could have a
material effect on the estimated fair values. The fair value estimates are based on Level 2 inputs of the fair value hierarchy
available as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. These amounts have not been revalued since those dates, and current
estimates of fair value could differ significantly from the amounts presented.
17. Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions
We continue to pursue the acquisition of businesses that are accretive to our Solid Waste business and enhance and
expand our existing service offerings. Our acquisitions for the reported periods are discussed below:
2021 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we acquired 11 businesses primarily related to our Solid Waste business.
Total consideration, net of cash acquired, for all acquisitions was $94 million, which included $73 million in net cash paid
117
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
and $21 million of other consideration, primarily purchase price holdbacks and the settlement of a preexisting promissory
note with one of the acquired businesses. In addition, we paid $3 million of holdbacks, primarily related to current year
acquisitions.
Our 2021 acquisitions discussed above include our acquisition of the remaining ownership interest in a waste diversion
technology company. Concurrent with our acquisition, the acquired entity issued shares to an unrelated third-party, diluting
our ownership interest. We determined the entity constituted a variable interest entity and concluded that we did not have
the power to direct its significant activities. As a result, we subsequently deconsolidated the entity and account for our
remaining ownership interest as an equity method investment.
2020 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we acquired four businesses related to our Solid Waste business, including
the acquisition of Advanced Disposal discussed further below. Total consideration, net of cash acquired of $36 million,
for all acquisitions was $4.1 billion, none of which related to other consideration such as purchase price holdbacks. In
2020, we paid $3 million of holdbacks, all of which related to prior year acquisitions. Contingent consideration obligations
are primarily based on achievement by the acquired businesses of certain negotiated goals, which generally include
targeted financial metrics.
Advanced Disposal — On October 30, 2020, we completed our acquisition of all outstanding shares of Advanced
Disposal for $30.30 per share in cash, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated April 14, 2019, as amended on
June 24, 2020. Total enterprise value of the acquisition was $4.6 billion when including approximately $1.8 billion of
Advanced Disposal’s net debt. This acquisition grew our footprint and allows us to provide differentiated, sustainable
waste management and recycling services to approximately three million new commercial, industrial and residential
customers, primarily located in the Eastern half of the U.S. The acquisition was funded using a $3.0 billion, 364-day,
U.S. revolving credit facility and our commercial paper program. In November 2020, we issued $2.5 billion of senior notes
and used a portion of the proceeds to repay all outstanding borrowings under the $3.0 billion, 364-day, U.S. revolver and
terminated the facility.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred $51 million of integration related costs, and for the year ended
December 31, 2020, we incurred $156 million of acquisition and integration related costs, which were primarily classified
as “Selling, general and administrative expenses.” The post-closing operating results of Advanced Disposal have been
included in our consolidated financial statements, within our existing reportable segments. Post-closing through
December 31, 2020, Advanced Disposal recognized $205 million, $142 million and $60 million of revenue, operating
expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, which are included in our Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
Our consolidated financial statements have not been retroactively restated to include Advanced Disposal’s historical
financial position or results of operations. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. In accordance
with the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price paid has been allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired
based upon their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date, with the excess of the purchase price over the net assets
acquired recorded as goodwill. The Company valued the customer relationship asset using an income approach;
specifically, the multi-period excess earnings method. The significant assumptions used to value customer relationships
included, among others, attrition rates, revenue growth rate, and discount rate. The Company valued the landfill assets
using an income approach; specifically, the multi-period excess earnings method. The significant assumptions used to
value landfill assets included, among others, the forecasted revenue and revenue growth (including forecasted waste
volumes and rate per ton), discount rate, and forecasted capital expenditures. The allocation of the purchase price was
finalized in October 2021.
118
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Goodwill of $2.5 billion was calculated as the excess of the consideration paid over the net assets recognized and
represents the future economic benefits expected to arise from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified
and separately recognized. Goodwill has been assigned to our reporting units that have integrated these operations as they
are benefitting from the synergies of the combination. Goodwill related to this acquisition is not deductible for income tax
purposes.
The following table shows the purchase price allocation as of the date acquired, and adjustments to October 30, 2021
(in millions):
October 30, 2020
Adjustments
Accounts and other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Parts and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments in unconsolidated entities . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities held for sale (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt, less current portion (b) . . . . . . .
Landfill and environmental remediation
liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total purchase price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
159
$
8
17
1,022
1,278
2,470
604
9
27
(107)
(155)
(19)
(12)
(234)
(441)
(242)
(223)
(79)
4,082
$
$
1
(1)
(1)
—
(12)
26
(3)
—
(2)
1
(3)
—
—
—
—
(13)
9
(2)
—
$
$
October 30, 2021
160
7
16
1,022
1,266
2,496
601
9
25
(106)
(158)
(19)
(12)
(234)
(441)
(255)
(214)
(81)
4,082
(a) In connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, we and Advanced Disposal entered into an agreement that
provided for GFL Environmental to acquire a combination of assets from us and Advanced Disposal to address
divestitures required by the U.S. Department of Justice. Upon acquisition these assets met the criteria for reporting
discontinued operations and were classified as held for sale and included within the “Assets held for sale” and
“Liabilities held for sale” line items in the above final allocation of purchase price. Immediately following the
acquisition, the divestiture transactions were consummated and the Company subsequently received cash proceeds
from the sale of $856 million.
(b) At the time of acquisition, Advanced Disposal had outstanding $425 million of 5.625% senior notes due
November 2024, the fair value of which was $438 million. In November 2020, we redeemed the notes pursuant to an
optional redemption feature.
The final allocation of $601 million for other intangibles includes $572 million for customer relationships with an
amortization period of 15 years and $29 million of other intangibles with a weighted average amortization period of seven
years.
119
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations for
the Company and Advanced Disposal as though the companies had been combined as of January 1, 2019. Examples of
adjustments made to arrive at the pro forma amounts include, but are not limited to, the following:
• The effect of divestitures required by the U.S. Department of Justice;
•
Intercompany true-ups based on acquisition/divestiture activity;
• Transaction expenses incurred by us and Advanced Disposal;
• Adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense due to step-up in fair value of the acquired assets; and
•
Interest expense adjustments.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved as if the acquisition had taken place as of
January 1, 2019 for the year ended December 31 (in millions, except per share amounts):
Operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 16,192
1,685
Net income attributable to Waste Management, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.99
Basic earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.96
Diluted earnings per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
2019
$ 16,660
1,472
3.47
3.44
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
423
425
425
428
2019 Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we acquired 18 businesses, including Petro Waste Environmental LP
(“Petro Waste”) discussed below, primarily related to our Solid Waste business. Total consideration, net of cash acquired,
for all acquisitions was $515 million, which included $501 million in cash paid and other consideration of $14 million,
primarily purchase price holdbacks. In 2019, we paid $6 million of contingent consideration, of which $4 million was
related to acquisitions completed prior to 2019. In addition, we paid $20 million of holdbacks, of which $9 million related
to 2019 acquisitions. Contingent consideration obligations are primarily based on achievement by the acquired businesses
of certain negotiated goals, which generally include targeted financial metrics.
Total consideration for our 2019 acquisitions was primarily allocated to $350 million of property and equipment,
$53 million of other intangible assets and $111 million of goodwill. Other intangible assets included $38 million of
customer relationships and $15 million of covenants not-to-compete. The goodwill was primarily a result of expected
synergies from combining the acquired businesses with our existing operations and was tax deductible.
Petro Waste — On March 8, 2019, Waste Management Energy Services Holdings, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of WMI, acquired Petro Waste. The acquired business provides comprehensive oilfield environmental services
and solid waste disposal facilities in the Permian Basin and the Eagle Ford Shale. The acquisition expanded our offerings
and enhanced the quality of solid waste disposal services for oil and gas exploration and production operations in Texas.
Our purchase price was primarily allocated to seven landfills, which are included in our property and equipment. The
acquisition was funded using commercial paper borrowings, and the acquisition accounting for this transaction was
finalized in 2019. The operating results of the acquired business did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial
statements for the periods presented herein. Given the significant change in energy market dynamics subsequent to the
acquisition, we saw a decline in the fair value of certain of these assets and recognized an impairment during 2020, as
discussed further in Note 11.
120
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Divestitures
In 2021, 2020 and 2019, the aggregate sales price for divestitures of certain landfill assets, as well as hauling and
ancillary operations, was $48 million, $856 million and $8 million, and we recognized net gains of $44 million, net gains
of $33 million and net losses of less than $1 million, respectively. In 2021, divestitures primarily related to the sale of
certain non-strategic Canadian operations, as discussed in Note 11. In 2020, divestitures primarily consisted of assets
required to be sold by the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with our acquisition of Advanced Disposal, as discussed
above. In 2019, divestitures were part of our continuous focus on improving or divesting certain non-strategic or
underperforming operations. The remaining amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows generally
relate to the sale of fixed assets.
18. Variable Interest Entities
Following is a description of our financial interests in unconsolidated and consolidated variable interest entities that
we consider significant:
Low-Income Housing Properties
We do not consolidate our investments in entities established to manage low-income housing properties because we
are not the primary beneficiary of these entities as we do not have the power to individually direct the activities of these
entities. Accordingly, we account for these investments under the equity method of accounting. Our aggregate investment
balance in these entities was $178 million and $228 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The debt
balance related to our investments in low-income housing properties was $156 million and $210 million as of
December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Trust Funds for Final Capping, Closure, Post-Closure or Environmental Remediation Obligations
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities — Trust funds that are established for both the benefit of the Company and
the host community in which we operate are not consolidated because we are not the primary beneficiary of these entities
as (i) we do not have the power to direct the significant activities of the trusts or (ii) power over the trusts’ significant
activities is shared. Our interests in these trusts are accounted for as investments in unconsolidated entities and receivables.
These amounts are recorded in other receivables, investments in unconsolidated entities and long-term other assets in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, as appropriate. We also reflect our share of the unrealized gains and losses on
available - for - sale securities held by these trusts as a component of our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Our investments and receivables related to these trusts had an aggregate carrying value of $110 million and $106 million
as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities — Trust funds for which we are the sole beneficiary are consolidated because
we are the primary beneficiary. These trust funds are recorded in restricted trust and escrow accounts in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities held by these trusts are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These trusts had a fair value of $117 million and
$114 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
19. Segment and Related Information
In 2021, our senior management began evaluating, overseeing and managing the financial performance of our Solid
Waste operations through two operating segments. Our East Tier primarily consists of geographic areas located in the
Eastern U.S., the Great Lakes region and substantially all of Canada. Our West Tier primarily includes geographic areas
located in the Western U.S., including the upper Midwest region, and British Columbia, Canada. Each of our Solid Waste
121
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
operating segments provides integrated environmental services, including collection, transfer, recycling, and disposal. The
Company finalized the assessment of our segments during the fourth quarter of 2021. The East and West Tiers are
presented in this report and constitute our existing Solid Waste business. This did not result in a change in our reporting
units for purposes of evaluating our goodwill. Reclassifications have been made to our prior period consolidated financial
information to conform to the current year presentation.
The operating segments not evaluated and overseen through our East and West Tiers are presented herein as “Other”
as these operating segments do not meet the criteria to be aggregated with other operating segments and do not meet the
quantitative criteria to be separately reported.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments as of December 31 and for the year then ended
is shown in the following table (in millions):
Gross
Intercompany
Operating
Net
Operating
Income
from
Depreciation
and
Operating
Revenues Revenues(d) Revenues Operations(e) Amortization
Expenditures
(f)
Capital
Total
Assets
(g)(h)
Years Ended December 31:
2021
Solid Waste:
East Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,278 $
West Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solid Waste (a) . . . . . . . . .
Other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,369
18,647
3,046
21,693
—
Corporate and Other (c) . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,693 $
2020
Solid Waste:
East Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,873 $
West Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solid Waste (a) . . . . . . . . .
Other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,241
16,114
2,364
18,478
—
Corporate and Other (c) . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18,478 $
2019
Solid Waste:
East Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,098 $
West Tier . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solid Waste (a) . . . . . . . . .
Other (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,289
16,387
2,317
18,704
—
Corporate and Other (c) . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18,704 $
(1,738) $ 7,540
7,461
(1,908)
15,001
(3,646)
2,930
(116)
17,931
(3,762)
—
—
(3,762) $ 17,931
(1,503) $ 6,370
6,584
(1,657)
12,954
(3,160)
2,264
(100)
15,218
(3,260)
—
—
(3,260) $ 15,218
(1,519) $ 6,579
6,681
(1,608)
13,260
(3,127)
2,195
(122)
15,455
(3,249)
—
—
(3,249) $ 15,455
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,037
2,103
4,140
34
4,174
(1,209)
2,965
1,672
1,800
3,472
(42)
3,430
(996)
2,434
1,847
1,934
3,781
(158)
3,623
(917)
2,706
$
$
$
$
$
$
970 $
883
1,853
70
1,923
76
1,999 $
708
579
1,287
181
1,468
571
2,039
$ 14,269
11,476
25,745
1,275
27,020
2,372
$ 29,392
801 $
738
1,539
87
1,626
45
1,671 $
537
465
1,002
75
1,077
508
1,585
$ 14,274
11,501
25,775
2,064
27,839
1,810
$ 29,649
776 $
687
1,463
75
1,538
36
1,574 $
670
620
1,290
118
1,408
407
1,815
$ 11,600
9,720
21,320
1,648
22,968
5,042
$ 28,010
(a) Income from operations provided by our Solid Waste business is generally indicative of the margins provided by our
collection, landfill, transfer and recycling lines of business. From time to time, the operating results of our reportable
122
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
segments are significantly affected by certain transactions or events that management believes are not indicative or
representative of our results.
Income from operations in our Solid Waste business increased for 2021, as compared with 2020, primarily due to
(i) revenue growth in our collection and disposal businesses driven by both yield and volume, as well as the acquisition
of Advanced Disposal; (ii) improved profitability in our recycling business from higher market prices for recycling
commodities and improved costs at facilities where we have made investments in enhanced technology and equipment
and (iii) changes from divestitures, asset impairments and unusual items as discussed further in Note 11. These
increases were partially offset by (i) labor cost pressure from frontline employee wage adjustments, increased turnover
driving up training costs and higher overtime due to driver shortages and volume growth; (ii) increased landfill
amortization from higher volumes and revisions in landfill estimates, including the anticipated timing of capping,
closure and post-closure activities at certain landfills and adjustments in 2020 to the inflation rate used to estimate
capping, closure, and post-closure asset retirement obligations that benefitted costs in 2020 and (iii) inflationary cost
pressures. During 2021, the positive earnings contributions from Advanced Disposal were offset by elevated
depreciation and amortization of acquired assets.
Income from operations for 2020 decreased, as compared with 2019, for the Solid Waste business due to the overall
negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in revenue declines from lower volumes and higher depreciation
expense which was primarily related to investments in capital assets, including our fleet and facilities. The declines
were partially offset by (i) higher yield in our collection and disposal businesses; (ii) the benefit of resumed fees and
price increases; (iii) lower operating costs directly related to our proactive steps taken to manage our variable costs in
the lower volume environment and (iv) a net divestiture gain of $33 million associated with the sale of net assets to
GFL Environmental, primarily within our West Tier segment.
Additionally, income from operations for our West Tier segment was impacted by $41 million of non-cash asset
impairment charges primarily related to two landfills and an oil field waste injection facility. Income from operations
for our East Tier segment was impacted by a $20 million non-cash impairment charge related to management’s
decision to close a landfill once its constructed airspace is filled and abandon any remaining permitted airspace.
Furthermore, in 2019, our West Tier segment benefited from the clean-up efforts of natural disasters primarily in
California and similar efforts did not recur in 2020.
(b) “Other” includes (i) elements of our WMSBS business; (ii) elements of our landfill gas-to-energy operations managed
by our WM Renewable Energy business and not included in the operations of our reportable segments; (iii) elements
of our third-party subcontract and administration revenues managed by our EES business and not included in the
operations of our reportable segments; (iv) our recycling brokerage services and (v) certain other expanded service
offerings and solutions. In addition, our “Other” segment reflects the results of non-operating entities that provide
financial assurance and self-insurance support for our Solid Waste business, net of intercompany activity.
The increase in income from operations for 2021, as compared with 2020, was primarily driven by increased market
values for renewable energy credits generated by our WM Renewable Energy business.
Income from operations for the Other segment for 2020, as compared with 2019, was favorably impacted primarily
by (i) volume increases in our WM Renewable Energy business as a result of a new renewable energy facility coming
online; (ii) our WMSBS business as a result of newly executed national account contracts and (iii) our recycling
brokerage business.
(c) “Corporate and other” operating results reflect certain costs incurred for various support services that are not allocated
to our reportable segments. These support services include, among other things, treasury, legal, digital, tax, insurance,
centralized service center processes, other administrative functions and the maintenance of our closed landfills.
Income from operations for “Corporate and Other” also includes costs associated with our long-term incentive
program.
123
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
These costs increased in 2021, as compared with 2020, due to (i) higher incentive compensation costs; (ii) increased
labor, support and integration costs following our acquisition of Advanced Disposal; (iii) strategic investments in our
digital platform; (iv) increased health and welfare costs attributable to medical care activity generally returning to
pre - pandemic levels from the lower levels experienced during 2020 and (v) charges pertaining to reserves for certain
loss contingencies during 2021. These increases were partially offset by lower consulting, advisory and legal fees
following the completion of our acquisition of Advanced Disposal in 2020 and changes in the measurement of our
environmental remediation obligations and recovery assets in both 2020 and 2021.
The costs increased in 2020, as compared with 2019, due to (i) higher consulting, advisory and legal fees associated
with our acquisition and integration of Advanced Disposal; (ii) strategic investments in our digital platform;
(iii) incremental costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and (iv) higher long-term incentive compensation
costs. These increased expenses were offset, in part, by (i) lower annual incentive compensation costs and (ii) lower
litigation reserves.
(d) Intercompany operating revenues reflect each segment’s total intercompany sales, including intercompany sales
within a segment and between segments. Transactions within and between segments are generally made on a basis
intended to reflect the market value of the service.
(e) For those items included in the determination of income from operations, the accounting policies of the segments are
the same as those described in Note 2. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we discontinued certain allocations from our
Corporate and Other segment to our Solid Waste operating segments and Other segment. Reclassifications have been
made to our prior period information for comparability purposes.
(f) Includes non-cash items. Capital expenditures are reported in our reportable segments at the time they are recorded
within the segments’ property and equipment balances and, therefore, may include amounts that have been accrued
but not yet paid.
(g) The reconciliation of total assets reported above to total assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31 is as follows (in millions):
Total assets, as reported above . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Elimination of intercompany investments and advances . . . . . . . . .
Total assets, per Consolidated Balance Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
$ 29,392
(295)
$ 29,097
2020
2019
$ 29,649 $ 28,010
(267)
$ 29,345 $ 27,743
(304)
(h) Goodwill is included within each segment’s total assets. For segment reporting purposes, our material recovery
facilities are included as a component of their respective Tiers and our recycling brokerage services are included as
part of our “Other” operations. The following table presents changes in goodwill during the reported periods by
segment (in millions):
Solid Waste
Balance, December 31, 2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Divested goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation and other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquired goodwill (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Divested goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation and other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
991
(12)
(2)
East Tier West Tier Other Total
$ 2,846 $ 70 $ 6,532
2,470
(15)
7
$ 3,823 $ 70 $ 8,994
76
(47)
5
$ 3,833 $ 75 $ 9,028
$ 3,616
1,479
(3)
9
$ 5,101
27
(11)
3
$ 5,120
34
(29)
—
15
(7)
2
(a) Includes $26 million of post-closing acquisition adjustments related to our acquisition of Advanced Disposal.
124
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The mix of operating revenues from our major lines of business for the year ended December 31 are as follows
(in millions):
Commercial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Residential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Landfill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recycling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intercompany (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
$ 4,760 $ 4,102
2,716
2,770
465
10,053
3,667
1,855
1,127
1,776
(3,260)
$ 17,931 $ 15,218
3,172
3,210
533
11,675
4,153
2,072
1,681
2,112
(3,762)
2019
$ 4,229
2,613
2,916
482
10,240
3,846
1,820
1,040
1,758
(3,249)
$ 15,455
(a) The “Other” line of business includes (i) certain services provided by our WMSBS business; (ii) our landfill
gas - to - energy operations managed by our WM Renewable Energy business; (iii) certain services within our EES
business, including our construction and remediation services and our services associated with the disposal of fly ash
and (iv) certain other expanded service offerings and solutions. In addition, our “Other” line of business reflects the
results of non-operating entities that provide financial assurance and self-insurance support for our Solid Waste
business, net of intercompany activity. Revenue attributable to collection, landfill, transfer and recycling services
provided by our “Other” businesses has been reflected as a component of the relevant line of business for purposes of
presentation in this table.
(b) Intercompany revenues between lines of business are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements included
within this report.
Fluctuations in our operating results may be caused by many factors, including period-to-period changes in the relative
contribution of revenue by each line of business, changes in commodity prices and general economic conditions. Our
revenues and income from operations typically reflect seasonal patterns. Our operating revenues tend to be somewhat
higher in summer months, primarily due to the higher construction and demolition waste volumes. The volumes of
industrial and residential waste in certain regions where we operate also tend to increase during the summer months. Our
second and third quarter revenues and results of operations typically reflect these seasonal trends.
Our 2020 operating results were negatively impacted by COVID-19, as volume declines began in March 2020 in our
landfill, industrial and commercial collection businesses due to steps taken by national and local governments to slow the
spread of the virus, including travel bans, prohibitions on group events and gatherings, shutdowns of certain businesses,
curfews, shelter-in - place orders and recommendations to practice social distancing. Throughout 2021, our volumes
recovered from the sharp decline experienced in 2020, with minimal impact from the resurgence in transmission of
COVID-19 associated with recent virus variants, as communities and businesses remained open. However, the potential
for future resurgence in transmission of COVID-19 and related business closures, due to virus variants or other pandemic
conditions, could adversely impact our volumes and costs in the future.
Service disruptions caused by severe storms, extended periods of inclement weather or climate events can significantly
affect the operating results of the geographic areas affected. On the other hand, certain destructive weather and climate
conditions, such as wildfires in the Western U.S. and hurricanes that most often impact our operations in the Southern and
Eastern U.S. during the second half of the year, can increase our revenues in the geographic areas affected as a result of
the waste volumes generated by these events. While weather-related and other event driven special projects can boost
125
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
revenues through additional work for a limited time, due to significant start - up costs and other factors, such revenue can
generate earnings at comparatively lower margins.
Net operating revenues relating to operations in the U.S. and Canada for the year ended December 31 are as follows
(in millions):
U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
$ 17,136 $ 14,505
713
$ 17,931 $ 15,218
795
2019
$ 14,701
754
$ 15,455
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, relating to operations in the U.S. and
Canada for the year ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021
2020
$ 13,428 $ 13,168
980
$ 14,419 $ 14,148
991
2019
$ 11,941
952
$ 12,893
126
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management (including the principal executive and financial officers) as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive and financial officers have
concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021 (the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10 - K) at a reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company, including the principal executive and financial officers, is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the 2013 framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Our internal controls
are designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States and includes those policies and procedures that:
i. pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the Company;
ii. provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;
and
iii. provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the
independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements, as stated in their report,
which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2021
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
127
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
PART III
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Board of Directors” and
“Executive Officers” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
“Proxy Statement”), to be held May 10, 2022. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end
of our fiscal year.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our CEO, CFO and Chief Accounting Officer, as well as other
officers, directors and employees of the Company. The code of ethics, entitled “Code of Conduct,” is posted on our website
at www.wm.com in the section “ESG — Corporate Governance” on the “Investors” page.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Board of
Directors — Compensation Committee Report,” “— Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,”
“— Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and
“— Executive Compensation Tables” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Executive
Compensation — Executive Compensation Tables — Equity Compensation Plan Table,” “Director and Officer Stock
Ownership,” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Board of
Directors — Related Party Transactions” and “— Independence of Board Members” in the Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Ratification of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information” in
the Proxy Statement.
128
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) (1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
PART IV
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) (2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules have been omitted because the required information is not significant or is included in the financial
statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable.
(a) (3) Exhibits:
Exhibit No.
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
— Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Waste Management, Inc. [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10 - Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010].
— Amended and Restated By-laws of Waste Management, Inc. [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to Form 8 - K dated November 17, 2020].
— Specimen Stock Certificate [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10 - K for the year ended
Description
December 31, 1998].
— Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Waste Management Holdings, Inc. [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 10 - K for the year ended December 31, 2014].
— Amended and Restated By-laws of Waste Management Holdings, Inc. [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014].
— Indenture for Subordinated Debt Securities dated February 3, 1997, among the Registrant and The Bank
of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (the current successor to Texas Commerce Bank National
Association), as trustee [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8 - K dated February 7, 1997].
— Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated September 10, 1997, among the Registrant and The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (the current successor to Texas Commerce Bank National
Association), as trustee [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8 - K dated September 10,
1997].
4.6
— Description of Waste Management, Inc.’s Common Stock [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019].
4.7*
— Schedule of Officers’ Certificates delivered pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated
September 10, 1997 establishing the terms and form of Waste Management, Inc.’s Senior Notes. Waste
Management and its subsidiaries are parties to debt instruments that have not been filed with the SEC
under which the total amount of securities authorized under any single instrument does not exceed 10%
of the total assets of Waste Management and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to
paragraph 4(iii)(A) of Item 601(b) of Regulation S-K, Waste Management agrees to furnish a copy of
such instruments to the SEC upon request.
— Officers’ Certificate delivered pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated September 10, 1997
establishing the terms and form of the 2.00% Senior Notes due 2029 [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2021].
— Guarantee Agreement by Waste Management Holdings, Inc. in favor of The Bank of New York Mellon
Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee for the holders of the 2.00% Senior Notes due 2029 [incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2021].
4.8
4.9
129
10.1†
10.2†
— 2014 Stock Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8 - K dated May 13, 2014].
— First Amendment to 2014 Stock Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
dated May 12, 2020].
10.3†
— 2009 Stock Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed March 25, 2009].
10.4†
— 2005 Annual Incentive Plan [incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed April 8, 2004].
10.5†
— Waste Management, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended and Restated effective May 12,
2020) [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8 - K dated May 12, 2020].
10.6†
10.7
— Waste Management, Inc. 409A Deferral Savings Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1,
2014 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10 - Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014].
— $3.5 Billion Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 7, 2019
by and among Waste Management, Inc., Waste Management of Canada Corporation, WM Quebec Inc.
and Waste Management Holdings, Inc., certain banks party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated November 7, 2019].
10.8
— Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement, substantially in the form as executed with each of Mizuho
Securities USA Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC, as Dealer, dated August 22, 2016 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Form 10 - K for
the year ended December 31, 2016].
10.9
— Commercial Paper Issuing and Paying Agent Agreement between Waste Management, Inc. and Bank of
America, National Association dated August 15, 2016 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 10 - K for the year ended December 31, 2016].
10.10† — First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between USA Waste-Management Resources,
LLC and James C. Fish, Jr. dated December 22, 2017 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K dated December 22, 2017].
10.11† — Employment Agreement between USA Waste-Management Resources, LLC and Devina A. Rankin
dated December 22, 2017 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated December 22,
2017].
10.12† — First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between USA Waste-Management Resources,
LLC and John J. Morris, Jr. [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated December 22,
2017].
10.13† — Employment Agreement between USA Waste-Management Resources, LLC and Charles C. Boettcher
dated December 22, 2017 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017].
10.14† — Form of Director and Executive Officer Indemnity Agreement [incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.43 to Form 10 - K for the year ended December 31, 2012].
10.15† — Waste Management Holdings, Inc. Executive Severance Plan [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2017].
10.16† — Form of 2019 Long Term Incentive Compensation Award Agreement for Senior Leadership Team
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated February 19, 2019].
10.17† — Form of 2020 Long Term Incentive Compensation Award Agreement for Senior Leadership Team
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated February 19, 2020].
10.18† — Form of 2021 Long Term Incentive Compensation Award Agreement for Senior Leadership Team
[incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated February 23, 2021].
Form of 2021 Long Term Incentive Compensation RSU Award Agreement.
— Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
— Guarantor Subsidiary.
— Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
— Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) and 15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, of James C. Fish, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer.
31.2*
— Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a - 14(a) and 15d - 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, of Devina A. Rankin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
32.1** — Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 of James C. Fish, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer.
130
10.19†*
21.1*
22.1*
23.1*
31.1*
32.2** — Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 of Devina A. Rankin, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer.
— Mine Safety Disclosures.
95*
101.INS* — Inline XBRL Instance.
101.SCH* — Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL* — Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation.
101.LAB* — Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels.
101.PRE* — Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation.
101.DEF* — Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.
104*
— Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
† Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.
None.
131
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
By:
/s/ JAMES C. FISH, JR.
James C. Fish, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date: February 15, 2022
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ JAMES C. FISH, JR.
James C. Fish, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 15, 2022
/s/ DEVINA A. RANKIN
Devina A. Rankin
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 15, 2022
/s/ LESLIE K. NAGY
Leslie K. Nagy
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 15, 2022
/s/ ANDRÉS R. GLUSKI
Andrés R. Gluski
/s/ VICTORIA M. HOLT
Victoria M. Holt
/s/ KATHLEEN M. MAZZARELLA
Kathleen M. Mazzarella
/s/ SEAN E. MENKE
Sean E. Menke
/s/ WILLIAM B. PLUMMER
William B. Plummer
/s/ JOHN C. POPE
John C. Pope
/s/ MARYROSE T. SYLVESTER
Maryrose T. Sylvester
/s/ THOMAS H. WEIDEMEYER
Thomas H. Weidemeyer
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
February 15, 2022
Chairman of the Board and Director
February 15, 2022
132
Corporate Information
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFFICERS
JAMES C. FISH, JR.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Waste Management, Inc.
ANDRÉS R. GLUSKI (A, C)
President and Chief Executive Officer
The AES Corporation
VICTORIA M. HOLT (A, N)
Former President
and Chief Executive Officer
Proto Labs, Inc.
KATHLEEN M. MAZZARELLA (C, N)
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Graybar Electric Company, Inc.
SEAN E. MENKE (A)
Chief Executive Officer
Sabre Corporation
WILLIAM B. PLUMMER (A, C)
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
United Rentals, Inc.
JOHN C. POPE (C, N)
Chairman
PFI Group
MARYROSE T. SYLVESTER (C)
Former U.S. Managing Director
and U.S. Head of Electrification
ABB Ltd.
THOMAS H. WEIDEMEYER (A, C, N)
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board,
Former Senior Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer
United Parcel Service, Inc.
JAMES C. FISH, JR.
President and Chief Executive Officer
STEVEN R. BATCHELOR
Senior Vice President, Operations
CHARLES C. BOETTCHER
Executive Vice President, Corporate
Development and Chief Legal Officer
RAFAEL E. CARRASCO
Senior Vice President, Operations
TARA J. HEMMER
Senior Vice President and Chief
Sustainability Officer
JOHN J. MORRIS, JR.
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
TAMLA D. OATES-FORNEY
Senior Vice President and
Chief People Officer
DEVINA A. RANKIN
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
NIKOLAJ H. SJOQVIST
Senior Vice President and
Chief Digital Officer
MICHAEL J. WATSON
Senior Vice President and
Chief Customer Officer
JEFF R. BENNETT
Assistant Treasurer
MARK A. LOCKETT
Vice President, Tax
LESLIE K. NAGY
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
DAVID L. REED
Vice President and Treasurer
(A) Audit Committee
(C) Management Development and
Compensation Committee
(N) Nominating and Governance
Committee
CHARLES S. SCHWAGER
Vice President and
Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer
COURTNEY A. TIPPY
Vice President and Corporate Secretary
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Waste Management, Inc.
800 Capitol Street, Suite 3000
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: (713) 512-6200
Facsimile: (713) 512-6299
WEB SITE
www.wm.com
INVESTOR RELATIONS
Security analysts, investment professionals,
and shareholders should direct inquiries to
Investor Relations at the corporate address
or call (713) 265-1656.
ANNUAL MEETING
We will be holding a virtual annual meeting
of the stockholders of the Company this year.
The virtual annual meeting is scheduled to be
held at 11:00 a.m. CT on May 10, 2022 at:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/WM2022
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Ernst & Young LLP
5 Houston Center, Suite 2400
1401 McKinney Street
Houston, Texas 77010
(713) 750-1500
COMPANY STOCK
The Company’s common stock is traded on
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
under the symbol “WM.” The number of
holders of record of common stock based on
the transfer records of the Company at
March 10, 2022 was 8,096.
Based on security position listings, the
Company believes that, as of March 7, 2022,
it had approximately 1,139 587 beneficial owners.
,
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Computershare
Jersey City, New Jersey
(800) 969-1190
800 Capitol Street - Suite 3000 - Houston, Texas 77002
www.wm.com