More annual reports from Westgold Resources Limited:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Westgold Resources Limited:
Newmont2019
ANNUAL
REPORT
CORPORATE
DIRECTORY
DIRECTORS
Peter J Newton (Non-Executive Chairman)
Peter G Cook (Managing Director)
Johannes S Norregaard (Executive Director)
Peter B Schwann (Non-Executive Director)
Fiona J Van Maanen (Non-Executive Director)
Suresh V Shet (Non-Executive Director)
COMPANY SECRETARY
David W Okeby
REGISTERED OFFICE
Level 6, 197 St Georges Tce
Perth WA 6000
Phone: +61 8 9462 3400
Fax: +61 8 9462 3499
E-mail: reception@westgold.com.au
Website: www.westgold.com.au
POSTAL ADDRESS
PO Box 7068
Cloisters Square Perth WA 6850
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
Listed on the Australian Securities Exchange
ASX Code: WGX
SHARE REGISTRY
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd
Level 11, 172 St Georges Tce
Perth WA 6000
GPO Box 2975 Melbourne Vic 3001
Telephone: (within Australia) 1300 850 505
Telephone: (outside Australia) +61 3 9415 4000
Facsimile: +61 3 9473 2500
DOMICILE AND COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
Australia
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
CHAIRMAN’S LETTER
MANAGING DIRECTOR’S COMMENT
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
DIRECTORS REPORT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
SECURITY HOLDER INFORMATION
AS AT 8 OCTOBER 2019
TABLES OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND
ORE RESERVES
1
2
4
12
42
43
44
45
46
106
107
113
115
CHAIRMAN’S
LETTER
Dear Shareholders
It is with pleasure that I present you Westgold’s Annual Report for the period ending 30 June 2019.
The year past has been yet another busy one with significant structural changes for the group.
After several years of heavy investment in the Murchison Region our development strategy is coming
to fruition. Our Murchison strategy has aggregated a massive control position in this region of prolific
past production and with a gold resource base nearly as large. We now control the majority of this region
with a plant in the north, a plant in the middle and a plant in the south. All plants are now operating at
full capacity and our output is rising and capital investment primarily sunk. In future years we reduce to
sustainable capital levels significantly lower than the past three years.
Our team has restructured our business and strategy. We have divested our outlying asset and under-
performing assets and although we have shrunk in size our output keeps rising and is concentrated on
the Murchison Region.
Our financial results reflect the robustness of our corporate team in the management of our affairs
and focus on wealth creation for shareholders with the divestment of assets without loss. Our gold
operations showing a massive $45.88 million turn-around in profits but most importantly our balance
sheet strengthened and we continued to achieve great progress and large capital re-investment in our
core operations without the stress of debt funding and with minimal shareholder dilution.
It’s an exciting year forward as our biggest single mine, Big Bell transitions to production as a low-
cost sub-level cave mine with a long life. The magnitude of the task involved in de-watering and re-
establishing this mine should not be underestimated and I am sure it will again rise to become one of
more prolific single mines in our sector.
Westgold has been ahead of the industry taking control of its own destiny as owner-operator in our
underground mines and most of our open pits. In doing so, insuring us from the potential agony of labour
and equipment tightness and escalating margins.
Our team has been resolute and unwavering in their focus in the Murchison and some small recognition
and acknowledgement has started to be reflected in our share price.
Mining is a long game and those with the fortitude to stick it out usually get rewarded in spades.
On a personal note, 2019 will be my last AGM as Chairman of Westgold as I retire from the industry. I leave
the Company in a sound financial position and with a clear strategy and pathway for success. I hand the
reigns over to my long-standing partner and the architect and driving force of our strategy, Peter Cook.
Peter J Newton
Chairman
1
CHAIRMAN’S LETTER
MANAGING
DIRECTOR’S
COMMENT
In the past year Westgold continued with its growth plan in the Murchison and our focus on increasing
our gold output.
The year also marked a tipping point where after three years of heavy investment and money walking out
the door, our revenue began to start to exceed our expenditure.
The regional aggregation we have put together is now 350 titles and over 124,000 hectares containing a
total mineral resource of 9.1 million ounces. In the year past we completed the refurbishment and re-
commissioning of the Tuckabianna Plant, bringing it back into production and setting up our Murchison
infrastructure base with three plants strategically placed to enable the exploitation of our ore reserves
and resources.
Our focus on re-establishing production from the prolific underground mines within our portfolio also
advanced. We now operate six underground mines with building output and true value that is yet to be
revealed.
Hidden away by the slog of daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly production is perhaps the most significant
strategic advantage we have over our peers. Our mines are shallow with an average depth of only about
450 vertical metres. The average depth of our peer group gold mines is approximately 950 vertical metres
and given that you would typically mine 50 vertical metres per annum, we have potentially 10 years of
mining to come before we get to the average depth.
The building of a regional production centre such as we have achieved in the Murchison is somewhat of
thankless task as is the renovation of the previously closed mines and plants. There are two choices to
achieve these outcomes:
1. Build faster with debt, or
2. Build progressively by re-investing cash flow.
The first choice may enable a quicker achievement of outcomes and be more trader friendly, however it
comes with significant risk if things don’t go to plan. It lacks the glamour and excitement of a brand new
build but the consequences if not seamlessly executed can be catastrophic for shareholders as the focus
to achieving the best outcome for the mine turns to the best outcome to limit the risk and exposure of
the bankers and financiers.
Unashamedly, Westgold under my stewardship has taken the alternative route, building and growing
within its internal means with equity, trading its assets and by re-investing the cash flow our mines
make in their early years to set them up for a brighter future. I firmly believe this is a more genuine and
rigorous process to create wealth for our shareholders in the long term.
During the past year we undertook a thorough review of our portfolio and reflected upon where we
have come from and where we are going. This resulted in a strategy to simplify our asset portfolio and
concentrate our focus on the Murchison Region as our core operations and future. As a result we have
purged the complex and de-focussing parts of our business to focus on the main game.
As we have done with the acquisition of the mining services division, our objective is always to manage
downside risk and protect ourselves from outliers that can derail our strategy. We do this also with the
short term hedging of our gold output. Here the strategy is about managing our stay-in-business risk
and locking in margins above our costs for a portion of our gold output correlated or somewhat linked to
the size of our capital investment and capitally developed ores in our mines.
MANAGING DIRECTOR’S COMMENT
2
Our staff and operating teams have worked hard this year with a resolute focus on our plans with the
success and progress reflecting in the improvements in our outputs as the year has progressed.
Annual gold output for the Westgold Group operations totalled 255,221 ounces at a cash cost (C1) of
A$1,253 per ounce and an all-in-sustaining cost (AISC) of $1,408 per ounce.
2019 Gold Production & Costs
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Gold Production
Cash Cost
AISC
The sections following provide detail on each of our operating sub-sets during the year.
$1,800
$1,600
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$0
3
MANAGING DIRECTOR’S COMMENT
Bluebird Processing Plant
Meekatharra Gold Operations
THE MURCHISON GOLD STRATEGY
Westgold’s Murchison gold strategy has been four years in the making. Simply put it is a large scale
aggregation aimed at consolidating ownership of all the major historic gold mining centres in the Central
Murchison Region.
This plan has seen the company collate 350 titles and over 124,000 hectares in area covering the vast
majority of the gold production centres in the Central Murchison region.
We now have three process plants operating at full capacity. One in the north, one in the middle and one
in the south. They have a combined total capacity of four million tonnes per annum. They are divided into
three hubs referred to as:
1. MGO – Meekatharra Gold Operations
2. CGO – Cue Gold Operations.
3. FGO – Fortnum Gold Operations.
At the MGO we control the whole of the historic Paddy’s Flat, Yaloginda, Nannine and Reedy’s gold
production centres which have produced more than 4.7 million ounces. Our development strategy has us
aiming to produce 110 - 140,000 ounces per annum.
At the CGO we control the whole of the historic Big Bell, Cuddingwarra, Day Dawn, Pinnacles and
Tuckabianna gold production centres which have produced more than 5.9 million ounces. Our development
strategy has us aiming to produce 100 - 110,000 ounces per annum.
The MGO and CGO have a combined mineral resource totalling 7.7 million ounces and a mining reserve of
2.2 million ounces. These are reported together as individual deposits and are capable of being delivered
to either processing hub in full or in part. At the FGO we control the prolific and historic gold production
centres of Labouchere, Fortnum, Peak Hill and Horseshoe where output has exceeded 1.5 million
ounces. The FGO total resource base currently stands at 1.39 million ounces with mining reserves of
423,000 ounces. Our development strategy has us aiming to produce 60-70,000 ounces per annum from
the existing 0.9 – 1.0 million tonne per annum Fortnum process plant.
Starlight Pit and Underground Mine
Fortnum Gold Operations
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
4
MEEKATHARRA GOLD OPERATIONS (MGO)
MGO covers the central part of Murchison portfolio and the historic gold mining centres of Paddy’s Flat,
Yaloginda, Nannine and Reedys. Production from these areas has been from various open pits, which
are progressively being replaced by underground mining as the historic mines are brought back into
production. Over the past year the South Emu – Triton underground was developed and now produces
ore to supplement the underground mine at Paddy’s Flat, increasing the proportion of higher-grade
underground ore in the plant feed.
The Bluebird processing hub comprising a nominal 1.4 - 1.6 million tonne per annum CIP plant and
associated infrastructure anchors the production sources. The harder ore feeds from both open pit and
underground sources impacted plant throughput dramatically during the year with a 19.5% reduction (or
317,000 tonnes) in throughput to 1.31 million tonnes achieved. This was the primary reason for a 16.1%
reduction in gold output to 94,280 ounces for the full year. A new secondary crushing circuit was added
to plant during the year resurrect throughput. It was constructed and commenced commissioning before
year end. It is expected that this addition will enable MGO to maintain nominal plant capacity despite a
greater proportion of hard ore coming from underground sources and deeper open pits as the project
progresses.
Gold output from the operation for the year was 94,280 ounces with C1 Cash Cost of A$1,264 per ounce.
All-in sustaining costs reduced by 2.75% over the previous year to A$1,451 per ounce. Gold output and
cost on a quarterly basis are graphed below:
MGO Gold Production & A$ Costs
'
Z
O
N
D
O
R
P
D
L
O
G
R
T
Q
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
MGO Gold Prod'n
MGO Cash Cost/oz
MGO AISC/oz
Sep Q 2018
25,298
1,188
1,389
Dec Q 2018
23,416
1,288
1,461
Mar Q 2019
23,333
1,346
1,483
Jun Q 2019
22,233
1,263
1,474
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
-
Z
O
R
E
P
T
S
O
C
MGO Gold Prod'n
MGO Cash Cost/oz
MGO AISC/oz
Sustaining capital was invested to maintain developed tonnages in the underground mines so that
production rates can be sustained. Additional growth capital was invested in start-up projects at the
South Emu underground mine to establish long-term mine services and infrastructure. The main capital
works program was the new secondary crushing circuit addition to the Bluebird Plant.
5
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
Bluebird Processing Plant
Meekatharra Gold Operations
CUE GOLD OPERATIONS (CGO)
CGO covers the southern part of Murchison portfolio and the historic gold mining centres of Big Bell,
Cuddingwarra, Day Dawn, Pinnacles and Tuckabianna. The Tuckabianna processing hub, a nominal 1.2
- 1.4 million tonne per annum CIP plant and associated infrastructure anchors the gold output from the
region.
The Tuckabianna Plant had its first full year of operation completing a series of phases of capacity building
and increasing gold output. Starting initially on low-grade and tailings stocks with a small amount of
Comet underground ore, feedstock moved to open pit ores with a small amount of the Big Bell ore hitting
the plant late in the year.
Open pit mining commenced at Day Dawn with these open pit ores beginning to dominate plant feed by
mid- year. These open pits are a transitional phase of production whilst the Big Bell mine builds to full
capacity of the ensuing year. The Big Bell mine will dominate long-term mill feed for CGO for the ensuing
10 years as the sub-level cave mine builds to full capacity over the year forward. Big Bell produced a
minor amount of ore during the capital development phase from remnants of the previous mining phase.
Gold output for CGO in its first year of ramp-up was 68,255 ounces at a C1 Cash Cost of A$1,338 per
ounce and an all-in sustaining cost of A$1,449 per ounce. Gold output and cost on a quarterly basis show
a steady ramp in output and a commensurate reduction in costs which are graphed below:
CGO Gold Prod'n & A$ Costs
'
Z
O
n
d
o
r
P
d
l
o
G
R
T
Q
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Gold Prod'n
Cash Cost/oz
AISC/oz
Sep Q 2018
12,557
1,661
1,730
Dec Q 2018
14,676
1,695
1,766
Mar Q 2019
20,108
1,076
1,250
Jun Q 2019
20,914
1,141
1,275
Gold Prod'n
Cash Cost/oz
AISC/oz
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
z
o
r
e
P
T
S
O
C
The Big Bell mine was the main capital works program with significant growth capital expended to re-
establish the mine and its network of infrastructure and services to enable a long-term sub-level cave
mining operation. In addition a new workers village was constructed at Big Bell. Other growth capital was
expended at the Comet Mine and the Great Fingall mine with the in-wall ramp for the pit cut-back and
longer-term decline integration.
Tuckabianna Processing Plant
Cue Gold Operations
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
6
FORTNUM GOLD OPERATIONS (FGO)
FGO covers the northern extremities of the Group’s Central Murchison tenure. Specifically, FGO
aggregates the historic mining centres of Labouchere, Fortnum, Horseshoe and Peak Hill with gold
processing anchored by the 0.9 – 1.0 million tonne per annum Fortnum processing hub.
Mining operations at FGO during the year were focused on three main ore sources, namely the Yarlaweelor
open pits, the Starlight Underground Mine and residual low-grade stocks in the region. During the year
excellent progress was made at the Starlight underground mine with the mine fully refurbished and
moving toward the exploitation of virgin lodes beneath the historic workings. Development into the sub-
parallel Trev’s lodes commenced with plans to bring this forward as a second production area in the year
forward. Open pit mining of the Stage 1 - Yarlaweelor Open Pits was completed toward the end of the
year. Available low-grade stocks on surface are sufficient for three years of blending with underground
feeds through the plant.
Gold output for the year 58,308 ounces at a C1 Cash Cost of A$1,064 per ounce and an all-in sustaining
cost of A$1,224 per ounce. Gold output and cost on a quarterly basis show a steady ramp in output and a
commensurate reduction in costs as operations mature:
FGO Gold Production & A$ Costs
'
s
'
z
O
N
D
O
R
P
D
L
O
G
R
T
Q
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Gold Prod'n
Cash Cost/oz
AISC/oz
Sep Q 2018
13,394
1,312
1,444
Dec Q 2018
13,673
1,100
1,244
Mar Q 2019
17,019
781
937
Jun Q 2019
14,222
1,123
1,329
Gold Prod'n
Cash Cost/oz
AISC/oz
e
Z
O
R
E
P
T
S
O
C
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
-
Growth capital at Fortnum was expended on a new airstrip for fly-in fly-out operations to reduce the
150 km commute to Meekatharra and for an upgrade to the village. Growth capital was also expended
for the establishment of a second mine portal access to enable exploitation of the Trev’s Lode system at
the Starlight underground mine.
7
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
Fortnum Processing Plant
Fortnum Gold Operations
HIGGINSVILLE GOLD OPERATIONS (HGO)
HGO continued to operate until their complete divestment on 10 June 2019. Consequently, HGO is
considered a discontinued operation for financial reporting purposes.
HGO had a difficult year for the Westgold Group. Gold output under achieved its plans and costs, and
margins.
Gold output was 38.5% lower than the previous year at 34,378 ounces. C1 Cash costs averaged A$1,375
per ounce and AISC’s averaged A$1,520 per ounce for the year.
A quasi sale/merger agreement was agreed in the second half of the year that resulted in the operating
subsidiaries being divested to RNC Minerals for a total consideration of A$50 million to be received as
approximately 42% in cash and remainder in shares, moving Westgold to become the largest shareholder
in RNC minerals with a holding of just above 10%.
The merger aspect of the divestment was about the aggregation of assets of both groups into one entity
in the region. The addition of the exciting Beta Hunt mine and its output to HGO provided a catalyst for a
longer life and brighter future for the operations.
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
8
OTHER ASSETS
Rover Project (Northern Territory) – 100%
Westgold, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Castile Resources Pty Ltd continues to hold substantial
polymetallic assets in the Rover Field near Tennant Creek, Northern Territory.
These assets include:
• The Rover 1 deposit; a polymetallic Iron-Oxide-Copper-Gold (IOCG) prospect with a significant
copper-gold-bismuth-cobalt resource which is close to development ready.
• The Explorer 142 prospect where initial drilling has defined high grade copper results from with
another IOCG system.
• The Explorer 108 prospect where a significant lead-zinc-silver resource has been defined.
• A series of other coincident magnetic and gravity anomalies through the cover sequence.
• The Warumpi Prospect which is a grass roots exploration play where initial works have discovered a
highly mineralised gossan containing copper and zinc.
Subsequent to the end of the reporting period, the Board of Westgold announced its intent to demerge
Castile Resources Pty Ltd with full proportional participation by all its shareholders. This is aimed giving
the projects independent and focussed exploration budgets to advance their exploration and development.
Lithium Interests – 100%
Westgold holds a significant package of Lithium royalties, exploration and mining rights covering the
freehold lands of Hampton Gold Mining Areas near Kalgoorlie.
As part of its strategy to shift its focus to its core gold projects in the Murchison a decision was made to
divest its royalty interests:
• The Lithium royalty on the northern part of the Mt Marion was sold to international royalty company,
SilverStream for A$13 million and remains subject to completion.
• The Lithium royalty on the Buldania Project was also sold to Silverstream, but the deal was pre-
empted by the developer, Liontown Resources. Liontown paid a $250,000 deposit and settled the
remaining $1.75 million just after the financial year end.
MINING SERVICES DIVISION
Westgold’s wholly-owned mining services division, Australian Contract Mining Pty Ltd (ACM) continued
to offer a full mining service to the Westgold Groups expanding gold operations during the year.
ACM is now operating six underground mining contracts for Westgold in its Murchison operations as well
as a number of open pit operations, crusher feed and ore cartage services for Westgold. These contracts
are internalised within the cost reporting of Westgold on an individual work area basis.
ACM also completed some minor works for external parties during the year with external revenue of $25
million.
Westgold continues to operate ACM with a balance between servicing its internal needs and preparing it
for separation as an independent services provider.
9
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
MINERAL RESOURCES & ORE RESERVES
WESTGOLD RESOURCES LIMITED
Gold Division (WA Operating Mines)
Mineral Resource Statement - Rounded for Reporting
30/6/19
Tonnes (‘000s)
Grade
Ounces Au (‘000s)
3,328
753
4,081
60,854
15,436
76,290
44,641
5,829
50,470
108,823
22,018
130,841
3.11
2.76
3.04
2.26
1.89
2.18
2.08
2.07
2.07
2.21
1.97
2.17
333
67
399
4,416
938
5,355
2,978
389
3,367
7,727
1,394
9,121
Project
Measured
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Sub-Total
Indicated
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Sub-Total
Inferred
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Sub-Total
Total
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Grand Total
Full Mineral Resource Statements including for the Northern Territory Projects can be found on page
115.
Glossary
CGO – Cue Gold Operations.
CMGP – Central Murchison Gold Project (aggregate of CGO and MGO to reflect processing optionality).
FGO - Fortnum Gold Operations.
MGO – Murchison Gold Operations.
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW 10
WESTGOLD RESOURCES LIMITED
Gold Division (WA Operating Mines)
Ore Reserve Statement - Rounded for Reporting
30/6/18
Tonnes (‘000s)
Grade
Ounces Au (‘000s)
1,814
891
2,705
23,379
5,473
28,852
25,193
6,364
31,558
2.43
2.55
2.47
2.73
1.99
2.59
2.71
2.07
2.58
142
73
215
2,054
350
2,404
2,196
423
2,620
Project
Proven
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Sub-Total
Probable
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Sub-Total
Total
CMGP (MGO + CGO)
FGO
Grand Total
Full Ore Reserve Statements can be found on page 115.
11
OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors submit their report together with the financial report of Westgold Resources Limited
(“Westgold” or “the Company”) and of the Consolidated Entity, being the Company and its controlled
entities (“the Group”), for the year ended 30 June 2019.
DIRECTORS
The names and details of the Company’s Directors in office during the financial year and until the date of
this report are as follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
Names, qualifications, experience and special responsibilities
Peter Newton – Independent Non-Executive Chairman (Appointed 6 October 2016)
Mr Newton was a highly successful stockbroker for 25 years before shifting his hand to corporate
management of resource companies where he has been a significant participant in the Australian
resource industry as an investor, non-executive director, Chairman and mentor in a number of listed and
successful companies. Mr Newton is also the Chairman of the Company’s Remuneration & Nomination
Committee and Audit Committee.
During the past three years, he has served as a director of the following public listed companies:
• Metals X Limited *.
Peter Cook – Managing Director (Appointed 19 March 2007)
Mr Cook (BSc (Applied Geology), MSc (Min.Econ.) WASM MAusIMM) has over 35 years of experience in the
fields of exploration, project, operational and corporate management of mining companies.
During the past three years, he has also served as a director of the following public listed companies:
• Metals X Limited (Appointed 23 July 2004 – Resigned 2 February 2017);
• Pantoro Limited (Appointed 31 August 2009 – Resigned 5 October 2016); and
• Nelson Resources Limited (Appointed 4 June 2013 – Resigned 1 February 2019).
Johannes Norregaard – Director of Operations (Appointed 29 December 2016)
Mr Norregaard (B.Eng (Mining) WASM, MAusIMM) has over 30 years of corporate and mine management
experience in base metal and gold operations across Australia, Canada and South East Asia.
Mr Norregaard has held no public company directorships in the past three years.
Peter B Schwann – Independent Non-Executive Director (Appointed 2 February 2017)
Mr Schwann (Assoc. in Applied Geology, FAusIMM, FAIG, MSEG) is a highly experienced, internationally
recognised geologist and mining executive. Mr Schwann has broad experience across multiple
commodities with extensive geological capability as well as significant operational management. Mr
Schwann serves on the Company’s Audit Committee and Remuneration & Nomination Committee.
During the past three years, he has served as a director of the following public listed companies:
• Aruma Resources Limited *.
Suresh Shet – Non-Executive Director (Appointed 18 December 2017)
Mr Shet (MSc Geol), MAusIMM) has over 22 years of experience in various mineral commodities in fields
ranging from exploration to feasibility studies, new mine development, mergers and acquisitions, and
project evaluation. Mr Shet is a nominee director of Golden and Energy Resources Ltd (GEAR) who is a
significant shareholder in the Company. He is also an Associate Member of the Singapore Institute of
Directors (SID).
Mr Shet has held no public company directorships in the past three years.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
12
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Fiona Van Maanen – Non-Executive Director (Appointed 6 October 2016)
Mrs Van Maanen is a CPA, holds a Bachelor of Business (Accounting) degree and a Graduate Diploma in
Company Secretarial Practice. Mrs Van Maanen has more than 25 years’ experience in accounting and
financial management in the mining and resources industry. Mrs Van Maanen also served as Company
secretary of Westgold until December 1, 2016, prior to its demerger from Metals X Limited. Mrs Van
Maanen serves on the Company’s Audit Committee and Remuneration & Nomination Committee.
Mrs Van Maanen has held no public company directorships in the past three years.
* Denotes current directorship.
INTERESTS IN THE SHARES OF THE COMPANY
As at the date of this report, the interests of the Directors in the shares and options of Westgold Resources
Limited were:
Director
PG Cook
JS Norregaard
PJ Newton
PB Schwann
FJ Van Maanen
SV Shet
Total
Fully Paid Ordinary Shares
10,779,066
-
6,941,656
-
435,521
-
18,156,243
Options
3,929,744
1,180,869
-
-
-
-
5,110,613
COMPANY SECRETARY
David Okeby (Appointed 1 December 2016)
Mr Okeby has significant legal, contractual, administrative and corporate experience in the mining
industry. Mr Okeby brings skills in governance, stakeholder relations and corporate activities including
mergers, acquisitions and disposals.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities during the year of the Group were the exploration, development and operation of
gold mines, primarily in Western Australia.
EMPLOYEES
The Group had 808 employees at 30 June 2019 (2018: 829).
13
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
100%
AUSTRALIAN CONTRACT
MINING PTY LTD
ACN 080 756 172
CONTRACT MINING
SERVICES
ACN 009 260 306
100%
BIG BELL GOLD
OPERATIONS PTY LTD
100%
ACN 090 642 809
100%
100%
ARAGON
RESOURCES PTY LTD
ACN 114 714 662
CASTILE
RESOURCES PTY LTD
ACN 124 314 085
100%
LOCATION 53
PTY LTD
ACN 618 320 773
MEEKATHARRA GOLD
OPERATIONS
CUE GOLD
OPERATIONS
FORTNUM GOLD
OPERATIONS
ROVER PROJECT
(NT)
LITHIUM
INTERESTS
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
OPERATING RESULTS
The Group’s operating results improved substantially over the previous year witnessed by a shift to
profitability with an increase in net profit after income tax to $14,130,064 (2018: loss $1,171,059).
The result also reflects the continued expansion of the Group’s activities in the Murchison Region and the
rationalisation of group assets to focus on the core Murchison assets. These actions over the year reflect
the following key measures:
• Consolidated revenue from continuing operations increased by 51% over the prior year to $418,317,447
(2018: $276,829,283);
• Consolidated total cost of sales from continuing operations increased by 35% over the prior year to
$408,078,123 (2018: $302,289,538);
• Following the rationalisation of mining tenements, an impairment on the carrying value of mining
tenements of $5,471,706 (2018: $635,040) was taken;
• The Group repaid $16,011,946 (2018: $23,887,875) of the gold prepayment facility;
• The Group’s profit after income tax from continuing operations increased by 142% to $13,487,139
(2018: loss $31,906,035).
On a segment basis, the three operating centres that made up the continuing operations of the Group
showed varied outcomes reflecting the phase that each operation was in during the year.
The Cue Gold Operations (“CGO”) continued their ramp up to full capacity with the plant having its first full
year of operation. The increased gold output from four consecutive quarters of improved performance
was reflected in an increase in Revenue to $120,694,689 (2018: $14,387,830). Gold output was focused
on minor short-term operations and capacity building, whilst the major Big Bell mine rehabilitation and
development works were completed, resulting in a minor segment loss of $1,047,700 (2018: $5,084,013).
The Fortnum Gold Operations (“FGO”) continued their ramp in gold output reflected by an increase in
revenue to $103,989,696 (2018: $69,808,741). Segment profits also increased to $15,724,413 (2018:
$447,893).
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
14
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Meekatharra Gold Operations (“MGO”) endured some issues with limited process plant capacity
and the delay in the installation of its new secondary crushing circuit. These were exacerbated by some
one-off dilutionary issues with bulk mining of ultramafic hosted orebodies in the Paddy’s Flat mine.
Consequently, gold output was lower and revenue dropped to $167,960,218 (2018: $181,334,613). In
addition, an impairment of the carrying value of accumulated mill scats of $11,491,150 was taken as no
certain route to reprocessing could be defined. The resultant outcome for MGO was a segment loss of $
20,392,554 (2018: $21,670,374).
Exploration activities continued at all operations during the year with $16,411,426 (2018: $25,521,635)
expended. A thorough review of accumulated land titles was completed resulting in a write-off of
$5,471,706 (2018: $635,040) of carrying values.
The contract mining and services division, Australian Contract Mining Pty Ltd (“ACM”) internalised
most of its contracts within the Group on a cost re-imbursement basis. However, external revenue of
$25,672,844 (2018: $11,298,099) was also generated during the year.
Westgold divested the Higginsville Gold Operations (“HGO”) to RNC Minerals (“RNC”) on 10 June 2019.
HGO had sustained a gross loss of $18,044,670 as its operations underperformed. A gain on sale of
$16,435,747 was recognised, with an after tax profit of $642,925 from the discontinued operations.
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows reflects a closing cash and cash equivalents of $67,196,289
(2018: $73,446,753).
Operating Activities
Group cash flow generated by operating activities increased on that of the previous corresponding year
with a total inflow of $81,231,882 (2018: $14,710,955).
Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities across the Group increased on that of the previous corresponding
period with a total outflow of $109,806,561 (2018: $96,762,714).
Cash flow applied to investing activities in the current year relate to the key growth capital at the Big
Bell and South Emu underground mines, major capital works on plant and equipment such as the new
airstrip and village upgrade at Fortnum, a new village at Big Bell and a new secondary crushing circuit at
the Bluebird Plant. Other capital investment was sustaining capital in all of the operating underground
mines to maintain developed tonnes and production output at similar levels.
Total capital re-investment in mine properties and development, exploration and evaluation expenditure
and property, plant and equipment during the year was $157,065,262, broken into key operations as
follows:
• MGO $52,958,699 (2018: $58,757,047);
• CGO $81,401,015 (2018: $50,568,806);
• FGO $21,699,381 (2018: $34,749,449); and
• Other $1,006,168 (2018: 6,526,789).
Capital commitments of $8,996,852 (2018: $20,902,157) existed at the reporting date, principally relating
to the purchase of plant and equipment.
15
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Financing Activities
External financing requirements reduced to $22,324,215 (2018: $88,361,144) reflecting the internal
sourced financing of growth activities.
• The Group received $23,489,570 from on the placement of 26,000,000 ordinary shares and the
conversion of 44,785 listed options;
• The Group drew on $20,853,550 (2018: $36,150,750) from a gold prepay facility; and
• The Group’s lease liabilities increased to $36,736,877 (2018: $30,648,318) over the year due to the
acquisition of additional mobile equipment within the contract mining services division.
SHARE ISSUES DURING THE YEAR
Date
Number of shares
Purpose
7 December 2018
26,000,000
Placement to supplement working capital
10 June 2019
18 June 2019
28 June 2019
Total
508
12,686
31,591
26,044,785
Issued on conversion of options
Issued on conversion of options
Issued on conversion of options
DIVIDENDS
No dividends were paid to Members during the 2019 financial year.
The Directors do not propose to pay any dividend for financial year ended 30 June 2019.
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Westgold narrowed its focus during the year to its regional dominance in the Central Murchison region
where the project aggregation matured to see all three of its processing hubs operating at full capacity.
Westgold completed the divestment of its Higginsville Gold Operations (HGO) on 10 June 2019. This
ended the Groups’ operational scattering in Western Australia and focused gold output on the Murchison
region. Westgold also commenced the divestment of its Lithium Royalty portfolio with contracts of sale
agreed by year-end.
Further, Westgold announced the proposed demerger of the Northern Territory polymetallic assets
consistent with becoming a pure-play West Australian gold producer. The proposed demerger is subject
to shareholder approval and remains contingent to satisfactory tax guidance being received from the
Australian Taxation Office.
Westgold has now aggregated approximately 350 mining titles covering 124,000 hectares in the Central
Murchison region. This tenure holds historic gold production from numerous gold mining centers of more
than 10 million ounces with enduring output from a regional total mineral resource of approximately 9
million ounces anchored by three processing plants with a combined capacity of 3.5 - 4.0 million tonnes
per annum.
The Central Murchison strategy is broken into three regional subsets with a processing hub (plant) at the
core of each one. These are collectively referred to as:
1. Meekatharra Gold Operations (“MGO”);
2. Cue Gold Operations (“CGO”); and
3. Fortnum Gold Operations (“FGO”).
Over the past year, MGO continued as a steady state operation with a progressive transition toward a
dominance of underground mining feeds. Whilst MGO output was slightly lower this year, with a few
operational issues impacting its outputs, a secondary crushing circuit has been constructed and
commission at the Bluebird process plant which will enable higher plant throughput from the progressively
harder mill feeds in the forward years.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
16
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
CGO has its first full year in operation with output ramping up on a quarter on quarter basis from the
small Comet underground mine and open pit sources, in anticipation of the build-up of ore from the large
Big Bell mine which will dominate long-term mill feed. Big Bell will start to progress to higher output
from the sub-level caving operation in the ensuing year.
FGO had a further year of progressive increases of output as the main Starlight underground mine begins
to build from virgin production areas.
The wholly owned mining services division of Westgold, Australian Contract Mining (ACM) continued to
provide mining services to all underground mines and most of its open pit operations during the year. The
re-build of capacity and capability within ACM enabled it to recommence tendering on external works
with one additional external job added during the year.
Meekatharra Gold Operations
MGO covers the central part of Murchison portfolio and the historic gold mining centres of Paddy’s Flat,
Yaloginda, Nannine and Reedys. Production from these areas has been from various open pits, which
are progressively being replaced by underground mining as the historic mines are brought back into
production. Over the past year the South Emu – Triton underground was developed and now produces
ore to supplement the underground mine at Paddy’s Flat, increasing the proportion of higher-grade
underground ore in the plant feed.
The Bluebird processing hub comprising a 1.4 - 1.6 million tonne per annum CIP plant and associated
infrastructure anchors the production sources. A new secondary crushing circuit was added to plant
during the year, this being commissioned in June 2019. It is expected to maintain plant capacity despite
a greater proportion of hard ore coming from underground sources and deeper open pits.
Gold output from the operation for the year was 94,280 ounces at a C1 Cash Cost of A$ 1,264 per ounce
and an all-in sustaining cost of A$ 1,451 per ounce as disclosed in the table on page 19.
Sustaining capital was invested to maintain developed tonnages in the underground mines so that
production rates can be sustained. Additional growth capital was invested in start-up projects at the
South Emu underground mine to establish long-term mine services and infrastructure. The main capital
works program was the construction of a new secondary crushing circuit to enable the plant to achieve
higher throughput from the increasingly harder ore sources.
Cue Gold Operations
CGO covers the southern part of Murchison portfolio and the historic gold mining centers of Big Bell,
Cuddingwarra, Day Dawn, Pinnacles and Tuckabianna. The Tuckabianna processing hub, a 1.2 - 1.4
million tonne per annum CIP plant and associated infrastructure anchors the gold output from the region.
The Tuckabianna Plant had its first full year of operation completing a series of phases of capacity building
and increasing gold output. Starting initially on low-grade and tailings stocks with a small amount of
Comet underground ore.
Open pit mining commenced at Day Dawn with open pit ore beginning to dominate plant feed by mid-year.
These will continue until the end of CY 2019 when ore feeds will begin to be dominated by ore from the
Big Bell mine. The Big Bell mine will dominate long-term mill feed for CGO for the ensuing 10 years as
the sub-level cave mine builds to full capacity over the year forward. Big Bell produced a minor amount
of ore during the capital development phase from remnants of the previous mining phase.
Gold output for CGO in its first year of ramp-up was 68,255 ounces at a C1 Cash Cost of A$ 1,338 per
ounce and an all-in sustaining cost of A$ 1,449 per ounce as disclosed in the table on page 19.
17
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Big Bell mine was the main capital works program with significant growth capital expended to re-
establish the mine and its network of infrastructure and services to enable a long-term sub-level cave
mining operation. In addition a new workers village was constructed. Other growth capital was expended
at the Comet Mine and the Great Fingall mine with the in-wall ramp and longer-term decline integration.
Fortnum Gold Operations
FGO covers the northern extremities of the Group’s Central Murchison tenure. Specifically, FGO
aggregates the historic mining centres of Labouchere, Fortnum, Horseshoe and Peak Hill with gold
processing anchored by the 0.9 – 1.0 million tonne per annum Fortnum processing hub.
Mining operations at FGO during the year were focused on three main ore sources, namely the Yarlaweelor
open pits, the Starlight Underground Mine and residual low-grade stocks in the region. During the year
excellent progress was made at the Starlight underground mine with the mine fully refurbished and
moving toward the exploitation of virgin lodes beneath the historic workings. Development into the sub-
parallel Trev’s lodes commenced with plans to bring this forward as a second production area in the year
forward. Open pit mining of the Stage 1 - Yarlaweelor Open Pits was completed toward the end of the
year. Available low-grade stocks on surface are sufficient for 3 years of blending with underground feeds
through the plant.
Gold output for the year 58,308 oz at a C1 Cash Cost of A$ 1,064 per ounce and an all-in sustaining cost
of A$ 1,224 per ounce as disclosed in the table on page 19.
Growth capital at Fortnum was expended on a new airstrip for fly-in fly-out operations to reduce the
150km commute to Meekatharra and for an upgrade to the village. Growth capital was also expended for
the establishment of a second mine portal access to enable exploitation of the Trev’s Lode system at the
Starlight underground mine.
Mining and Services Division
Westgold continued to expand its wholly owned mining and services division, ACM in line with the
groups expanding mining operations. ACM expanded its diamond drilling division during the year and
began to tender on external works, successfully winning a third party contract. Westgold continues to
build capacity and capability in the ACM business and will transition it toward being and independent
contractor over the ensuing year.
Rover Project
The Company holds significant gold and base metal assets in the Tennant Creek and the West Arunta
region. The Rover Project is a postulated undercover repetition of the rich Tennant Creek goldfield 80km
to the north-east. Exploration to date has fully tested a small number of anomalies and significant
mineralised Iron Oxide Copper Gold (“IOCG”) systems have been discovered at the Rover 1 and Explorer
142 prospects. In addition, significant lead-zinc-silver discoveries have been made at Explorer 108 and
recently at the Curiosity Prospect to its south. The Company is planning the divestment of these assets
as it continues the focus on its Western Australian gold mines.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
18
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Westgold Operating Performance by Operation
Year ended 30 June 2019
Physical Summary
UG Ore Mined
UG Grade Mined
OP BCM Mined
OP Ore Mined
OP Grade Mined
Ore Processed
Head Grade
Recovery
Gold Produced
Gold Sold
Achieved Gold Price
Cost Summary
Mining
Processing
Admin
Stockpile Adjustments
C1 Cash Cost (produced)
Royalties
Marketing/Cost of sales
Sustaining Capital
Corporate Costs
All-in Sustaining Costs **
Project Startup Capital
Exploration Holding Cost
All-in Cost ***
t
g/t
t
g/t
%
oz
oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
Units
HGO^
MGO
CGO
FGO
Group
t
g/t
0
0.00
BCM
1,639,163
718,161
1.78
669,201
256,446
398,810
1,324,457
3.82
434,780
452,734
1.49
3.94
2.90
3.57
1,878,920
1,518,884
535,036
469,335
5,471,748
2,175,266
1.77
1.68
1.70
709,002
1,310,499
1,169,527
849,853
4,038,881
1.74
80.4%
34,378
33,168
1,762
742
674
116
(157)
1,375
52
2
56
35
1,520
143
82
1,745
2.64
84.8%
94,280
94,544
1,758
744
385
77
58
1,264
94
1
85
7
1,451
241
91
1,783
1.99
90.4%
68,255
67,576
1,776
750
537
69
(18)
1,338
44
0
60
6
1,449
855
44
2,347
2.23
95.7%
58,308
58,585
1,775
688
390
75
(88)
1,064
53
1
89
18
1,224
155
29
1,408
2.21
87.9%
255,221
253,874
1,768
732
466
80
(25)
1,253
66
1
75
13
1,408
372
63
1,843
19
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Year ended 30 June 2018
Units
HGO^
SKO^^
MGO
CGO
FGO
Group
Physical Summary
UG Ore Mined
UG Grade Mined
OP BCM Mined
OP Ore Mined
OP Grade Mined
Ore Processed
Head Grade
Recovery
Gold Produced
Gold Sold
t
g/t
t
g/t
%
oz
oz
1.73
84.79
55,958
56,071
Achieved Gold Price
A$/oz
1,662
Cost Summary
Mining
Processing
Admin
Stockpile Adjustments
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
590
732
159
(83)
t
g/t
-
-
286,006
707,268
32,745
126,401
1,152,420
2.83
3.81
3.60
2.77
3.45
BCM
3,191,374
867,097
3,191,519
784,004
241,480
921,014
1.74
1.70
1.58
-
-
-
3,158,074
10,408,064
480,048
2,426,546
1.63
1.65
1,189,400
499,078
1,627,141
204,269
845,180
4,365,068
2.31
90.14
34,086
36,107
1,665
868
208
54
(54)
2.56
84.07
112,430
109,871
1,651
750
353
163
(6)
1.71
79.17
8,917
8,572
1,668
583
794
156
(88)
1.66
92.14
41,820
41,840
1,668
578
482
227
(20)
2.09
86.29
253,210
252,460
1,659
696
454
158
(35)
C1 Cash Cost (produced)
A$/oz
1,398
1,075
1,260
1,445
1,266
1,273
Royalties
Marketing/Cost of sales
Sustaining Capital
Corporate Costs
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
72
2
72
21
31
2
114
20
82
1
140
8
27
1
140
10
43
1
54
23
64
2
107
15
All-in Sustaining Costs **
A$/oz
1,565
1,241
1,492
1,623
1,387
1,462
Project Startup Capital
Exploration Holding Cost
A$/oz
A$/oz
287
88
163
55
542
97
848
54
673
27
467
76
All-in Cost ***
A$/oz
1,940
1,459
2,131
2,525
2,087
2,005
^ HGO was sold to RNC in June 2019 and is therefore treated as a discontinued operation.
^^ South Kalgoorlie Operations (“SKO”) was sold to Northern Star Resources Limited (“NST”) in Mar 2018 as is
therefore treated as a discontinued operation.
* C1 Cash Cost (“C1”): represents the cost for mining, processing and administration after accounting for movements
in inventory (predominantly ore stockpiles). It includes net proceeds from by-product credits, but excludes the cost
of royalties and capital costs for exploration, mine development and plant and equipment.
** All-in Sustaining Cost (“AISC”): is made up of the C1 cash cost plus royalty expense, sustaining capital expense
and general corporate and administration expenses.
*** All-in Cost (“AIC”): is made up of the AISC plus growth (major project) capital and discovery expenditure.
C1, AISC and AIC are non-IFRS measures and have not been audited.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
20
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Lithium Royalties
Westgold is in the process of divesting its Mount Marion Lithium Royalty for a gross $13 million in cash.
Agreement was reached to sell the Buldania Lithium Royalty for $2 million in cash with a $250,000
prepayment being received during June 2019 and final settlement occurring on 29 July 2019.
Investments
Westgold held the following equity investments as at 30 June 2019:
• Musgrave Minerals Limited (ASX:MGV) 13.31% (2018: 14.68%);
• RNC Minerals (TSX:RNX) 10.29% (2018: 6.46%);
• Aruma Resources Limited (ASX:AAJ) 1.17% (2018: 1.17%); and
• Auris Minerals Limited (ASX:AUR) 0.73% (2018: 0.74%).
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
Total equity increased to $443,485,911 (2018: $405,816,161), representing 26,000,000 shares issued at
$23,400,000 and the conversion of 44,785 listed options at $89,750.
The sale of the Higginsville Gold Operations to RNC Minerals was completed on 10 June 2019.
Consideration for the sale was approximately $24m in cash and $31m in RNC shares. Escrow restrictions
prevail over the RNC shareholding with approximately 50% of the holdings escrowed for six months and
the remainder for twelve months.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
There have been no significant events after the balance date.
LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS
The Group is expected to continue exploration, mining, processing, production and marketing of gold
bullion in Australia, and will continue the development of its gold exploration projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE
The Group’s operations are subject to the relevant environmental protection legislation (Commonwealth
and State legislation). The Group holds various environmental licenses issued under these laws,
to regulate its mining and exploration activities in Australia. These licenses include conditions and
regulations in relation to specifying limits on discharges into the air, surface water and groundwater,
rehabilitation of areas disturbed during the course of mining and exploration activities and the storage
of hazardous substances.
The board of directors monitors all environmental performance obligations. The operations are
subjected to Government agency audits and site inspections from time to time. There have been no
material breaches of the Group’s licenses and all mining and exploration activities have been undertaken
in compliance with the relevant environmental regulations.
21
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
SHARE OPTIONS
Employee options
On 23 May 2019, the Company issued 1,999,600 unlisted employee options (WGXO) to senior management
under the Employee Share Option Plan, the principle terms being:
• The Employee Options have been issued for nil consideration;
• Each Employee Option carries an entitlement to one fully paid ordinary share in the Company for
each Employee Option vested;
• Vesting only occurs after the end of the Performance Periods (30 June 2020 and 30 June 2021) and
the number of Employee Options that vest (if any) will depend on:
-
-
Growth in Return on Capital Employed over the Performance Periods; and
Total shareholder return relative to the S&P/All Ordinaries Gold Index over the Performance
Periods.
• 460,614 of the Employee Options that vest will expire if not exercised on the vesting date;
• 1,538,986 of the Employee Options that vest will expire two years after the vesting date;
• Unvested Employee Options lapse on cessation of a holder’s employment with Westgold;
• Any Employee Options that do not vest after the end of the Performance Periods will automatically
lapse; and
• No amount is payable by a holder of Employee Options in respect of the shares allocated upon vesting
of the Employee Option.
Unissued shares
As at the date of this report, there were 16,999,600 unissued ordinary shares under option relating to
unlisted options.
Option holders do not have any right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue of the
Company or any related body corporate.
Shares issued as a result of exercising options
During the financial year 44,785 listed options were converted to acquire fully paid ordinary shares in
the Company, refer to note 25 for further details. Subsequent to the year-end a further 15,603 fully paid
ordinary shares were issued as a result of the conversion of listed options.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
During the financial year, the Company paid a premium in respect of a contract of insurance to insure
Directors and Officers of the Company and related bodies corporate against those liabilities for which
insurance is permitted under section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001. Disclosure of the nature of the
liabilities and the amount of the premium is prohibited under the conditions of the contract of insurance.
INDEMNIFICATION OF AUDITORS
To the extent permitted by law, the Company has agreed to indemnify its auditors, Ernst & Young, as part
of the terms of its audit engagement agreement against claims by third parties arising from the audit
(for an unspecified amount). No payment has been made to indemnify Ernst & Young during or since the
financial year.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
22
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
The number of meetings of Directors (including meetings of committees of Directors held during the
year and the number of meetings attended by each Director was as follows:
Directors Meetings
Audit Committee
Remuneration
& Nomination
Committee
Eligible
to attend
Attended
Eligible
to attend
Attended
Eligible
to attend
Attended
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
PG Cook
PJ Newton
JS Norregaard
PB Schwann
SV Shet
FJ Van Maanen
Committee Membership
As at the date of this report, the Company had an Audit Committee and a Remuneration and Nomination
Committee of the Board of Directors.
Members acting on the committees of the Board during the year were:
Audit Committee
PJ Newton *
PB Schwann
FJ Van Maanen
Remuneration & Nomination Committee
PJ Newton *
PB Schwann
FJ Van Maanen
* Designates the Chairman of the Committee.
23
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)
Contents
1. Remuneration report overview
2. Remuneration governance
3. Non-Executive Director remuneration
4. Executive remuneration
5. Performance and executive remuneration outcomes
6. Executive employment arrangements
7. Additional statutory disclosure
1. REMUNERATION REPORT OVERVIEW
The Directors of Westgold Resources Limited present the Remuneration Report (“the Report”) for the
Group for the year ended 30 June 2019 (FY2019). This Report forms part of the Directors Report and
has been audited in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 and its regulations.
The Report details the remuneration arrangements for Westgold’s Key Management Personnel
(“KMP”) being the:
• Non-Executive Directors (“NEDs”); and
• Managing Director (“MD”), executive directors and senior executives (collectively “the executives”).
KMP are those who directly, or indirectly, have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the major activities of the Group.
Details of KMP of the Group are set out below:
Name
Position
Appointed
Resigned
(i) Non-Executive Directors (NEDs)
PJ Newton
Non-Executive Chairman
PB Schwann
Non-Executive Director
SV Shet
Non-Executive Director
FJ Van Maanen
Non-Executive Director
(ii) Executive Directors
PG Cook
Managing Director
JS Norregaard
Director of Operations
(iii) Senior Executives
PM Storey
General Manager (MGO)
PW Wilding
General Manager (CGO)
RB Armstrong
General Manager (FGO)
6 October 2016
2 February 2017
18 December 2017
6 October 2016
19 March 2007
29 December 2016
23 July 2018
1 July 2018
1 July 2018
DJ Noort
DW Okeby
General Manager (ACM)
20 August 2018
Company Secretary & Legal Manager
1 December 2016
DA Fullarton
Chief Financial Officer
21 May 2018
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
24
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2. REMUNERATION GOVERNANCE
Remuneration and Nomination Committee Responsibility
The remuneration and nomination committee is a subcommittee of the Board. It is primarily
responsible for making recommendations to the Board on:
• Non-Executive Director fees;
• Executive remuneration (Directors and senior executives); and
• The executive remuneration framework and incentive plan policies.
The remuneration and nomination committee assess the appropriateness of the nature and amount
of remuneration of non-executive directors and executives on a periodic basis by reference to relevant
employment market conditions with the overall objective of ensuring maximum stakeholder benefit
from the retention of a high performing directors and executive team.
The composition of the remuneration and nomination committee is set out on page 23 of this annual
report.
Use of remuneration advisors
During the prior year, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee approved the engagement of
BDO Remuneration and Reward Pty Ltd (“BDO”) to review and provide recommendations on the
Group’s executive remuneration framework and policies.
Both BDO and the Committee are satisfied the advice received from BDO is free from undue influence
from the KMP to whom the remuneration recommendations apply.
The remuneration recommendations were provided to the Committee as an input into decision
making only. The Remuneration Committee considered the recommendations, along with other
factors, in making its remuneration decisions.
The fees paid to BDO for the remuneration recommendations were Nil (2018: $27,250). No other fees
were paid to BDO during the year.
Outcome of BDO Remuneration Review
Following the BDO remuneration review the following changes to the remuneration structure were made
during FY2018:
The introduction of a formal short-term incentive (“STI”) policy that has the objective of linking
executive remuneration with the achievement of the Group’s key operational and financial targets.
The STI will be an annual “at risk” component of remuneration for executives that is payable in cash
based on performance against key performance indicators (refer to section 4).
Following the BDO remuneration review the following changes to the remuneration structure were made
in FY2019:
The long-term incentive (“LTI”) policy was amended to focus the efforts of executives on long-term
value creation to further align management’s interests with those of the shareholders. The LTI
is considered to be an “at risk” component of remuneration for executives that is payable in zero
exercise price options (“ZEPOs”) (being an option to acquire an ordinary share in Westgold for nil
consideration).
The Managing Director has a maximum LTI opportunity of 80% of fixed remuneration and other
executives have a maximum LTI opportunity of 60% of fixed remuneration. The number of options
granted is determined by dividing the LTI remuneration dollar amount by the volume weighted
average price of Westgold shares traded on the ASX during the 5-day trading period prior to the day
of the grant.
25
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
As a transitional arrangement, for the options granted in FY2019, the LTI performance period was
treated as two tranches:
• 50% of the options will be performance tested against the LTI performance measures for the
period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020; and
• 50% of the options will be performance tested against the LTI performance measures for the
period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021.
All subsequent grants of options will have a three-year performance period. There will be no
opportunity for re-testing. Any options that do not vest will lapse after testing. Executives are able
to exercise any options that vest for up to two years after the vesting date before the vested options
lapse.
Options will be subject to the following performance conditions:
• Relative Total Shareholder Return (“RTSR”) (50%); and
• Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”) (50%).
The Board considers that RTSR is an appropriate performance hurdle because it ensures that a
proportion of each participant’s remuneration is explicitly linked to shareholder value and ensures
that participants only receive a benefit where there is a corresponding direct benefit to shareholders.
The Board considers ROCE as an appropriate measure as it focuses executives on generating
earnings that efficiently use shareholder capital as the reinvestment of earnings.
Remuneration report at FY2018 AGM
The FY2018 remuneration report received positive shareholder support at the FY2018 AGM with a
vote of 79% in favour.
3. NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REMUNERATION
NED Remuneration Policy
Westgold’s NED fee policy is designed to attract and retain high calibre directors who can discharge
the roles and responsibilities required in terms of good governance, strong oversight, independence
and objectivity.
The Company’s constitution and the ASX listing rules specify that the NED fee pool limit, shall
be approved periodically by shareholders. The last determination was on listing of the Company
and included in the notice of meeting for demerger from Metals X Limited and approved at the
Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders on 24th November 2016 with an aggregate fee pool
of $500,000 per year.
The amount of the aggregate remuneration sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner
in which it is paid to NEDs is reviewed annually against comparable companies. The Board also
considers advice from external advisors when undertaking the review.
Non-executive directors are encouraged to hold shares in the Company and align their interests with
the Company’s shareholders. The shares are purchased by the directors at the prevailing market
share price.
NED Remuneration Structure
The remuneration of NEDs consists of director’s fees. There is no scheme to provide retirement
benefits to NEDs other than statutory superannuation. NEDs do not participate in any performance-
related incentive programs.
Fees paid to NEDs cover all activities associated with their role on the Board and any sub-committees.
No additional fees are paid to NEDs for being a Chair or Member of a sub-committee. However, NEDs
are entitled to fees or other amounts as the Board determines where they perform special duties or
otherwise perform extra services on behalf of the Company. They may also be reimbursed for out-
of- pocket expenses incurred as a result of their directorships.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
26
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
4. EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION
Executive Remuneration Policy
In determining executive remuneration, the Board aims to ensure that remuneration practices are:
• competitive and reasonable, enabling the Company to attract and retain high calibre talent;
• aligned to the Company’s strategic and business objectives and the creation of shareholder value;
• transparent and easily understood; and
• acceptable to shareholders.
The Company’s approach to remuneration ensures that remuneration is competitive, performance-
focused, clearly links appropriate reward with desired business performance and is simple to
administer and understand by executives and shareholders.
In line with the remuneration policy, remuneration levels are reviewed annually to ensure alignment
to the market and the Company’s stated objectives to provide a base level of remuneration which is
both appropriate to the position and is competitive in the market.
Executive Remuneration Structure
The Company’s remuneration structure provides for a combination of fixed and variable pay with the
following components:
• fixed remuneration;
• short-term incentives (“STI”); and
• long-term incentives (“LTI”).
In accordance with the Company’s objective to ensure that executive remuneration is aligned to
Company performance, a portion of executives’ remuneration is placed “at risk”. The relative
proportion of FY2019 potential total remuneration packages split between the fixed and variable
remuneration is shown below:
Executive
Fixed remuneration
Managing Director
Other Executives
71%
78%
STI
17%
10%
LTI
12%
12%
Elements of remuneration
Fixed remuneration
Fixed remuneration consists of base salary, superannuation and other non-monetary benefits and is
designed to reward for:
• the scope of the executive’s role;
• the executive’s skills, experience and qualifications; and
•
individual performance.
27
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Short Term Incentive (STI) arrangements
Under the STI, all executives have the opportunity to earn an annual incentive award which is
delivered in cash. The STI recognises and rewards annual performance.
How is it paid?
How much can executives
earn?
How is performance
measured?
When is it paid?
What happens if an executive
leaves?
Any STI award is paid in cash after the assessment of annual
performance.
In FY2019, the STI dollar values that executives are entitled to
receive as a percentage of their fixed remuneration would not
exceed 50% for the Managing Director and 40% for the other
executives.
A combination of specific Company Key Performance Indicators
(“KPIs”) are chosen to reflect the core drivers of short-
term performance and provide a framework for delivering
sustainable value to the Group and its shareholders.
The following KPIs were chosen for the 2019 financial year:
• KPI 1: Safety & Environmental Performance Targets (25%);
• KPI 2: All-in Sustaining Cost (AISC) relative to budget (25%);
• KPI 3: Gold production relative to budget (25%); and
• KPI 4: Personal KPI as assessed by Remuneration
Committee (25%).
These measures have been selected as they can be reliably
measured, are key drivers of value for shareholders and
encourage behaviours in line with the Company’s core values.
The STI award is determined after the end of the financial year
following a review of performance over the year against the STI
performance measures by the Remuneration and Nomination
Committee. The Board approves the final STI award based on
this assessment of performance and the award is paid in cash
up to three months after the end of the performance period.
Where executives cease to be an employee of the Group:
• due to resignation or termination for cause, before the end
of the financial year, no STI is awarded for that year; or
• due to redundancy, ill health, death or other circumstances
approved by the Board, the executive will be entitled
to a pro-rata cash payment based on assessment of
performance up to the date of ceasing employment for that
year.
unless the Board determines otherwise.
What happens if there is a
change of control?
In the event of a change of control, a pro-rata cash payment will
be made based on assessment of performance up to the date of
the change of control (subject to Board discretion).
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
28
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
STI performance
A combination of financial and non-financial measures were used to measure performance for STI
rewards, with a score being calculated on the following measures:
Metric
Weighting
Targets
Score
Safety – Medically
Treated Injury
Frequency Rate
(“MTIFR”)
Safety – Lost Time
Annual MTIFR decreases by 25% or more
10
Annual MTIFR stays within ±25%
Annual MTIFR increases by 25% or more
Annual LTIFR decreases by 25% or more
Injury Frequency Rate
10
Annual LTIFR stays within ±25%
(“LTIFR”)
Annual LTIFR increases by 25% or more
Environmental
5
No serious breaches of environmental management
Exceptional environmental management performance
AISC relative to budget
25
Serious breach of environmental management
Actual costs below budget by 10%
Actual costs below budget by between 5% and 10%
Actual costs below budget by less than 5%
Actual costs above budget by less than 5%
Actual costs above budget by between 5% & 10%
Actual costs above budget by more than 10%
Actual production above budget by 10%
Actual production above budget by between 5% and 10%
Gold Production
relative to budget
25
Actual production above budget by less than 5%
Actual production equals to budget
Actual production below budget by less than 5%
Actual production below budget by less than 5%
Underperforms budget by between 5% & 10%
Good Effort and Exceptional Achievement
Personal performance
25
Good Effort and Good Achievement
Average Effort and Good Achievement
Average Effort and Average Achievement
Total
100
10
5
0
10
5
0
5
2.5
0
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
15
10
5
29
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
STI outcomes
Performance against those measure is as follows for FY2019:
Name
Position
Achieved
STI
%
STI Awarded
(ii)
$
Maximum
Potential award
$
PG Cook
Managing Director
JS Norregaard
Director of Operations
PM Storey
PW Wilding
General Manager (MGO) (i)
General Manager (CGO) (i)
RB Armstrong
General Manager (FGO) (i)
DW Okeby
Company Secretary & Legal Manager
DA Fullarton
Chief Financial Officer
53
48
53
51
43
53
53
153,700
96,000
47,700
45,450
35,700
39,750
39,750
290,000
200,000
90,000
89,117
83,023
75,000
75,000
Total
458,050
902,140
(i) Performance is measured based on a combination of the operational segment performance as
well as overall Group performance.
(ii) The FY2019 STI awards were paid in August 2019.
Long Term Incentive (LTI) arrangements
Under the LTI plan, annual grants of options are made to executives to align remuneration with the
creation of shareholder value over the long-term.
How is it paid?
Executives are eligible to receive options.
Are options eligible for
dividends?
In FY2019 Zero Exercise Price Options (“ZEPOs”) were issued,
being an option to acquire an ordinary share in Westgold for a
zero exercise price.
How much can executives
earn?
In FY2018 Premium Exercise Price Options (“PEPOs”) were
issued, being an option to acquire an ordinary share in Westgold
for a pre-determined exercise price, calculated at 125% of the
volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of Westgold shares
traded on the ASX during the 5 day trading period prior to the
day of the grant.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
30
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
ZEPOs
How is performance
measured?
The options will vest and become exercisable subject to the
service and performance conditions being met. The options
have been issued in two tranches.
Tranche 1
The service condition requires:
Continued employment for the two-year period from 1 July 2018
to 30 June 2020.
The performance condition comprises the following:
• Relative Total Shareholder Returns (50%); and
• Return on Capital Employed (50%).
Tranche 2
The service condition requires:
Continued employment for the three-year period from 1 July
2018 to 30 June 2021.
The performance condition comprises the following:
• Relative Total Shareholder Returns (50%); and
• Return on Capital Employed (50%).
Relative Total Shareholder Return Performance Condition
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) is the percentage growth in
shareholder value, which takes into account factors such as
changes in share price and dividends paid. The Relative TSR
performance condition measures Westgold’s ability to deliver
superior shareholder returns relative to its peer companies
by comparing the TSR performance of Westgold against the
performance of the S&P/All Ordinaries Gold Index. The vesting
schedule for the Relative TSR measure is as follows:
Relative TSR Performance
% Contribution to the
Number of Employee Options
to Vest
Below Index
Equal to the Index
0%
50%
Above Index and below 15%
above the Index
Pro-rata from 50% to 100%
15% above the Index
100%
31
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
How is performance
measured?
Return on Capital Employed Performance Condition
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) measures the efficiency
with which management uses capital in seeking to increase
shareholder value. The vesting schedule for the ROCE measure
is as follows:
ROCE Performance
% Contribution to the
Number of Employee Options
to Vest
Less than or equal to the
average annual weighted
average cost of capital
(WACC)
WACC (calculated as above)
+ 3%
WACC (calculated as above) +
between 3% and 6%
WACC (calculated as above)
+ 6%
PEPOs
0%
50%
Pro-rata from 50% to 100%
100%
Options are subject to a one-year service-period performance
measure. There are no other performance conditions as it is
designed as a retention plan.
The options have an exercise price of 125% of the 5-day VWAP
of Westgold shares traded on the ASX prior to the day of the
grant.
The long-term incentive policy has been amended for FY2019
to focus on long-term value creation and further align
managements’ interest with those of the shareholders.
When is performance
measured?
ZEPOs
Tranche 1
The measurement date is 30 June 2020 unless otherwise
determined by the Board.
Tranche 2
The measurement date is 30 June 2021 unless otherwise
determined by the Board.
Executives may exercise the options for up to two years after
the vesting date before the options lapse.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
32
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
What happens if an executive
leaves?
What happens if there is a
change of control?
Where executives cease to be an employee of the Group:
• due to resignation or termination for cause, then any
unvested options will automatically lapse on the date of the
cessation of employment; or
• due to redundancy, ill health, death or other circumstances
approved by the Board, the executive will generally be
entitled to a pro-rata number of unvested options based
on achievement of the performance measures over
the performance period up to the date of cessation of
employment; and
• where an employee ceases employment after the vesting
of their options, the options automatically lapse after three
months of cessation of employment.
unless the Board determines otherwise on compassionate
grounds.
In the event of a change of control, the performance-period end
date will be brought forward to the date of the change of control
and ZEPO’s will vest based on performance over the shortened
period (subject to board discretion).
5. PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION OUTCOMES
Remuneration earned by executives in 2019
The actual remuneration earned by executives in the year ended 30 June 2019 is set out in Table
1 on page 35. This provides shareholders with a view of the remuneration paid to executives for
performance in FY2019 year.
STI performance and outcomes
A combination of financial and non-financial measures were used to measure performance for STI
rewards. As a result of the Group’s performance against those measures STIs rewarded for the
FY2019 were paid in August 2019, but have been disclosed in Table 1.
LTI performance and outcomes
PEPO’s granted in FY2018 vested in November 2018. ZEPO’s granted in FY2019 will be subject to
performance hurdles and issued in two tranches. Tranche 1 has a two-year vesting period ending in
June 2021 and Tranche 2 has a three-year vesting period ending in June 2022.
Executive Directors (PG Cook and JS Norregaard) were granted a total 460,614 ZEPO’s in May 2019.
These were approved by shareholders at the AGM in November 2018.
Other Executive were granted a total 1,538,986 ZEPO’s in May 2019 under the ESOP.
For further details of options granted and vested refer to Table 3 below.
33
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Overview of Company performance
The table below sets out information about Westgold’s earnings and movements in shareholder
wealth for the past five years up to and including the current financial year.
30 June 15 * 30 June 16 * 30 June 17 * 30 June 18 * 30 June 19
Closing share price
Profit (loss) per share (cents)
N/A
4.49
Net tangible assets per share
$0.44
Dividend paid per shares (cents)
-
N/A
(6.75)
$0.34
-
$1.84
5.18
$0.98
-
$1.85
(0.34)
$1.12
-
$1.88
3.74
$1.14
-
* The comparatives have not been adjusted for changes due to the adoption of AASB 15 and AASB 9.
Clawback of remuneration
In the event of serious misconduct or material misstatement in the Group’s financial statements,
the board has the discretion to reduce, cancel or clawback any unvested short-term incentives or
long-term incentives.
Share trading policy
The Westgold trading policy applies to all non-executive directors and executives. The policy prohibits
employees from dealing in Westgold securities while in possession of material non-public information
relevant to the Group. Executives must not enter into any hedging arrangements over unvested long-
term incentives under the Group’s long-term incentive plan. The Group would consider a breach of
this policy as gross misconduct, which may lead to disciplinary action and potentially dismissal.
6. EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
A summary of the key terms of employment agreements for executives is set out below. There is
no fixed term for executive service agreements and all executives are entitled to participate in the
Company’s STI and LTI plans. The Company may terminate employment agreements immediately for
cause, in which the executive is not entitled to any payment other than the value of fixed remuneration
and accrued leave entitlements up to the termination date.
Base Salary
$
Superannuation Notice Period
Name
PG Cook
(Managing Director)
JS Norregaard
(Director of Operations)
PM Storey
(General Manager MGO)
PW Wilding
(General Manager CGO)
RB Armstrong
(General Manager FGO)
DJ Noort
(General Manager ACM)
DW Okeby (Company Secretary
& Legal Manager)
DA Fullarton
(Chief Financial Officer)
580,000
500,000
300,000
300,000
280,000
375,000
250,000
250,000
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
9.5%
Termination
Payment
6 months
base salary
6 months
base salary
3 months
3 months
3 months
Per NES *
3 months
Per NES *
3 months
Per NES *
3 months
Per NES *
3 months
Per NES *
3 months
Per NES *
* NES are National Employment Standards as defined in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), which outline
the minimum termination benefits based on years of service.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
34
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
7. EXECUTIVE CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
2019
Salary and Fees
Cash Bonus
Annual Leave
Benefit
Non monetary
benefits
Short Term
Post
employment
Superannuation
Long term
benefits
Long service
leave
Share-based
payment
Options
Total
% Performance
related
Non-executive Directors
PJ Newton
PB Schwann
FJ Van Maanen
SV Shet
Executive Directors
PG Cook (4)
JS Norregaard (4)
80,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
320,000
609,585
521,559
Other key management personnel
PM Storey (1, 4)
PW Wilding (2, 4)
RB Armstrong (2, 4)
DJ Noort (1, 4)
DW Okeby (3)
DA Fullarton
Totals
285,869
287,057
280,000
336,936
245,192
250,000
2,816,198
3,136,198
-
-
-
-
-
153,700
96,000
47,700
45,450
35,700
-
39,750
39,750
458,050
458,050
-
-
-
-
-
4,695
14,192
23,045
19,370
10,099
23,483
(400)
7,096
101,580
101,580
-
-
-
-
-
5,940
6,441
-
-
-
2,870
7,342
7,809
30,402
30,402
7,600
7,600
7,600
-
22,800
25,515
25,941
27,158
25,018
26,600
21,045
23,293
23,750
198,320
221,120
-
-
-
-
-
18,214
5,793
1,547
19,538
3,451
1,161
7,851
1,804
59,359
59,359
-
-
-
-
-
282,571
199,473
4,487
4,487
35,452
5,609
56,821
3,739
592,639
592,639
87,600
87,600
87,600
80,000
342,800
1,100,220
869,399
389,806
400,920
391,302
391,104
379,849
333,948
4,256,548
4,599,348
-
-
-
-
14
11
12
11
9
-
10
12
1. PM Storey and DJ Noort were appointed on 23 July 2018 and 20 August 2018 respectively.
2. PW Wilding and RB Armstrong were appointed on 1 July 2018.
3.
4. Where employees have reached the maximum super contribution base, the amount of deemed super in excess of the maximum was paid out as salary at the employee’s election.
Includes amounts recovered from Pantoro Limited in respect of remuneration for services provided of $66,733.
35
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2018
Salary and Fees
Cash Bonus
Annual Leave
Benefit
Non monetary
benefits
Short Term
Post
employment
Superannuation
Long term
benefits
Long service
leave
Share-based
payment
Options
Total
% Performance
related
Non-executive Directors
PJ Newton
PB Schwann
FJ Van Maanen (6)
SV Shet (1)
Executive Directors
PG Cook (6)
JS Norregaard (5, 6)
80,000
80,000
81,900
42,489
284,389
612,794
534,784
Other key management personnel
PD Hucker (6)
DW Okeby (3)
DA Fullarton (1)
SM Balloch (2, 3)
JG Brock (2, 4, 6)
Totals
324,498
225,000
29,487
354,238
341,298
2,422,099
2,706,488
-
-
-
-
-
-
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
50,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
25,192
10,505
17,729
9,798
2,393
13,747
1,441
80,805
80,805
-
-
-
-
-
5,350
5,937
2,715
7,739
-
3,889
1,810
27,440
27,440
7,600
7,600
5,700
-
20,900
22,306
26,800
25,502
21,375
2,801
33,653
24,999
157,436
178,336
-
-
-
-
-
(8,457)
3,877
15,226
29,079
141
9,798
(822)
48,842
48,842
-
-
-
-
-
87,600
87,600
87,600
42,489
305,289
1,050,352
1,707,537
271,517
903,420
348,630
348,630
-
437,994
348,630
734,300
641,621
34,822
853,319
717,356
2,805,753
5,592,375
2,805,753
5,897,664
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
SV Shet and DA Fullarton were appointed 18 December 2017 and 21 May 2018 respectively.
JG Brock and SM Balloch resigned 30 June 2018 and 13 July 2018 respectively.
Includes amounts recovered from Pantoro Limited in respect of remuneration for services provided by DW Okeby and SM Balloch of $59,624 and $74,564 respectively.
Includes annual leave paid out on termination.
The cash bonus was paid in lieu of options.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. Where employees have reached the maximum super contribution base, the amount of deemed super in excess of the maximum was paid out as salary at the employee’s election.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
36
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
8. ADDITIONAL STATUTORY DISCLOSURES REQUIRED UNDER THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001
Table 1: Westgold options granted, vested or lapsing during the period
Executive
Granted
Grant date
Fair value per
option
Total value at
grant date
Vesting date
Exercise price
Expiry date
Vested
Lapsed
FY 2019
PG Cook
JS Norregaard
PM Storey
PW Wilding
69,936
69,936
69,936
69,936
45,218
45,217
45,218
45,217
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
28/11/2018
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
$0.23
$0.98
$0.33
$0.98
$0.23
$0.98
$0.33
$0.98
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$15,945
$34,443
$22,939
$34,443
10,310
22,269
14,831
22,269
6,078
18,248
8,303
18,248
6,078
18,248
8,303
18,248
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
37
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Executive
Granted
Grant date
Fair value per
option
Total value at
grant date
Vesting date
Exercise price
Expiry date
Vested
Lapsed
RB Armstrong
DJ Noort
DW Okeby
DA Fullarton
FY 2018
PG Cook
27,134
27,134
27,134
27,134
33,917
33,918
33,917
33,918
22,611
22,612
22,611
22,612
22,611
22,612
22,611
22,612
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
23/05/2019
1,400,000
22/11/2017
JS Norregaard
1,000,000
23/11/2017
PD Hucker
DW Okeby
SM Balloch
JG Brock
RB Armstrong
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
175,000
23/11/2017
23/11/2017
23/11/2017
23/11/2017
23/11/2017
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$0.22
$1.34
$0.31
$1.34
$0.45
$0.45
$0.45
$0.45
$.045
$0.45
$0.45
6,078
18,248
8,303
18,248
7,597
22,810
10,379
22,810
5,065
15,207
6,919
15,207
5,065
15,207
6,919
15,207
627,806
448,433
133,621
133,621
133,621
133,621
77,946
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
22/11/2018
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.31
$2.31
$2.31
$2.31
$2.31
$2.31
$2.31
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
30/06/2022
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
30/06/2023
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,400,000
1,000,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
175,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The value of the share-based payments granted during the period is recognised in compensation over the vesting period of the grant. For details on the valuation
of the options, including models and assumptions used, please refer to note 28.
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
38
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED) (CONTINUED)
Table 2: Shareholdings of key management personnel (including nominees)
Balance held at
1 July 2018
On exercise of
options
Net change other 1
Balance held at 30
June 2019
Directors
PG Cook
PJ Newton
SJ Norregaard
PB Schwann
10,029,066
6,941,656
-
-
FJ Van Maanen
435,521
SV Shet
Executives
PM Storey
PW Wilding
RB Armstrong
DJ Noort
DW Okeby
DA Fullarton
-
-
-
-
-
30,234
-
Total
17,436,477
1. Represents acquisition of shares on market.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
750,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10,779,066
6,941,656
-
-
435,521
-
-
-
-
-
30,234
-
750,000
18,186,477
Table 3: Performance right and option holdings of key management personnel (including nominees)
Options
balance at
beginning of
year 1 July
2018
3,650,000
Directors
PG Cook
JS Norregaard
1,000,000
PJ Newton
PB Schwann
SV Shet
FJ Van Maanen
Executives
PM Storey
PW Wilding
-
-
-
-
-
-
RB Armstrong
175,000
DJ Noort
-
Options
granted as
remuneration
Other
change
Options
balance at
end of year
30 June 2019
Options
not vested
and not
exercisable
Options
vested and
exercisable
279,744
180,869
-
-
-
-
135,669
135,669
135,669
135,669
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,929,744
1,180,869
279,744
180,869
3,650,000
1,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
135,669
135,669
310,669
135,669
135,669
135,669
135,669
135,669
-
-
-
-
-
-
175,000
-
39
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
Options
balance at
beginning of
year 1 July
2018
Options
granted as
remuneration
Other
change
Options
balance at
end of year
30 June 2019
Options
not vested
and not
exercisable
Options
vested and
exercisable
DW Okeby
1,200,000
DA Fullarton
-
90,446
90,446
Total
6,025,000
1,184,181
-
-
-
1,290,446
90,446
90,446
90,446
1,200,000
-
7,209,181
1,184,181
6,025,000
Loans to key management personnel and their related parties
There are no loans to key management personnel during the years ended 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
Other transactions to key management personnel and their related parties
There are no other transactions with key management personnel during the years ended 30 June 2019
and 30 June 2018.
End of Audited Remuneration Report.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In recognising the need for the highest standards of corporate behaviour and accountability, the Directors
of the Company support and have adhered to the principles of Corporate Governance. The Company’s
corporate governance statement is available at the Company’s website at:
www.westgold.com.au/about/corporate-governance/
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE
The Directors received the Auditor’s Independence Declaration, as set out on page 41, from Ernst &
Young.
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The following non-audit services were provided by the entity’s auditor, Ernst & Young. The Directors are
satisfied that the provision of non-audit is compatible with the general standard of independence for
auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The nature and scope of each type of non-audit service
provided means that auditor independence was not compromised.
Ernst & Young received or are due to receive the following amounts for the provision of non-audit services
(refer to note 31):
Tax compliance services
$
116,000
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
PG Cook
Managing Director
Perth, 26 August 2019
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
40
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE
DECLARATION
Ernst & Young
11 Mounts Bay Road
Perth WA 6000 Australia
GPO Box M939 Perth WA 6843
Tel: +61 8 9429 2222
Fax: +61 8 9429 2436
ey.com/au
Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of Westgold
Resources Limited
As lead auditor for the audit of Westgold Resources Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2019, I
declare to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
a) No contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in
relation to the audit; and
b) No contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
This declaration is in respect of Westgold Resources Limited and the entities it controlled during the
financial year.
Ernst & Young
Philip Teale
Partner
Perth
26 August 2019
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:038
41
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
Continuing operations
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit (loss)
Other income
Finance costs
Other expenses
Accumulated mill scats written off
Fair value gain on financial assets
Impairment loss on available-for-sale financial assets
Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off
Impairment of goodwill
Profit (loss) before income tax from continuing operations
Notes
2019
2018
5
7(a)
6
7(b)
7(c)
12
15
15
18
418,317,447
276,829,283
(408,078,123)
(302,289,538)
10,239,324
(25,460,255)
5,519,887
5,148,437
(1,325,025)
(2,576,830)
(9,129,172)
(12,361,832)
(11,628,184)
24,474,899
-
-
-
(2,475,760)
(5,471,706)
(635,040)
-
(2,553,772)
12,680,023
(40,915,052)
Income tax benefit
Profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations
8
807,116
9,009,017
13,487,139
(31,906,035)
Discontinued operations
Profit from discontinued operations after tax
36
642,925
30,734,976
Net profit (loss) for the year
Other comprehensive profit for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive profit (loss) for the year
Total comprehensive profit (loss) attributable to:
members of the parent entity
Earnings per share attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the
parent (cents per share)
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
-
-
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
Basic profit (loss) per share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total operations
Diluted profit (loss) per share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Total operations
9
9
9
9
3.57
0.17
3.74
3.57
0.17
3.74
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
(9.36)
9.01
(0.35)
(9.36)
9.01
(0.35)
42
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT
30 JUNE 2019
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Prepayments
Other financial assets
Total current assets
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss
Available-for-sale financial assets
Property, plant and equipment
Mine properties and development costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Total non-current assets
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Unearned income
Total current liabilities
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Provisions
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Accumulated losses
Share-based payments reserve
Other reserves
TOTAL EQUITY
Notes
2019
2018
10
11
12
13
14
15
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
24
21
23
8
25
26
27
27
67,196,289
73,446,753
6,992,121
19,905,830
45,502,914
60,693,057
1,336,486
1,427,836
1,366,359
1,286,546
122,455,646
156,698,545
56,210,813
-
-
6,267,158
175,572,503
181,409,840
218,207,334
175,644,187
104,276,449
147,262,738
554,267,099
510,583,923
676,722,745
667,282,468
57,741,966
85,208,108
7,963,523
7,195,801
18,271,020
16,819,651
25,470,487
18,075,375
109,446,996
127,298,935
70,323,565
78,018,113
18,465,857
13,828,667
35,000,416
42,320,592
123,789,838
134,167,372
233,236,834
261,466,307
443,485,911
405,816,161
299,494,861
276,976,897
(51,784,989)
(65,915,053)
14,282,408
13,260,686
181,493,631
181,493,631
443,485,911
405,816,161
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
43
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
30 JUNE 2019
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from customers
Interest received
Other income
Payments to suppliers and employees
Interest paid
Income tax refunded (paid)
Net cash flows from operating activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Payments for property, plant and equipment
Payments for mine properties and development
Payments for exploration and evaluation
Payment for financial assets
Proceeds from sale of financial assets
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Cash acquired on acquisition of subsidiary
Acquisition of subsidiary
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary
Payments for performance bond facility
Proceeds from performance bond facility
Net cash flows used in investing activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payment of finance lease liabilities
Repayment of related party borrowings
Proceeds from gold prepayment
Proceeds from share issue
Payments for share issue costs
Net cash flows from financing activities
Notes
2019
2018
478,864,463
4,387,876
5,940,455
(406,035,568)
(2,038,023)
112,679
81,231,882
408,791,905
566,207
821,046
(392,290,195)
(1,416,560)
(1,761,448)
14,710,955
(34,096,282)
(89,329,478)
(16,411,426)
(138,153)
5,798,098
2,197,033
-
-
22,314,937
(141,290)
-
(109,806,561)
(47,359,009)
(99,053,638)
(25,521,635)
(3,360,000)
61,540,372
79,848
2,357,406
(3,000,000)
17,461,016
-
92,926
(96,762,714)
10
15
36
4(g)
24
25(b)
(20,848,905)
-
20,853,550
23,489,570
(1,170,000)
22,324,215
(15,371,603)
(2,500,000)
36,150,750
72,457,098
(2,375,100)
88,361,145
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
10
(6,250,464)
73,446,753
67,196,289
6,309,386
67,137,367
73,446,753
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
44
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
2019
At 1 July 2018
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Total comprehensive loss for the year net of tax
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners
Share-based payments
Issue of share capital
Share issue costs, net of tax
At 30 June 2019
2018
At 1 July 2017
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Total comprehensive loss for the year net of tax
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners
Share-based payments
Issue of share capital
Share issue costs, net of tax
At 30 June 2018
Issued capital
Accumulated losses
Share based
payments reserve
Equity reserve
Total Equity
276,976,897
-
-
-
-
23,489,570
(971,606)
(65,915,053)
14,130,064
-
14,130,064
-
-
-
13,260,686
181,493,631
-
-
-
1,021,722
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
405,816,161
14,130,064
-
14,130,064
1,021,722
23,489,570
(971,606)
299,494,861
(51,784,989)
14,282,408
181,493,631
443,485,911
173,944,902
-
-
-
-
105,407,095
(2,375,100)
276,976,897
(64,743,994)
(1,171,059)
-
(1,171,059)
-
-
-
8,941,075
181,493,631
-
-
-
4,319,611
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(65,915,053)
13,260,686
181,493,631
299,635,614
(1,171,059)
-
(1,171,059)
4,319,611
105,407,095
(2,375,100)
405,816,161
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
45
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
1. CORPORATE INFORMATION
The financial report of Westgold Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2019 was authorised
for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 26 August 2019.
Westgold Resources Limited (“the Company” or “the Parent”) is a for profit company limited by
shares incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities
Exchange.
The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Group are described in the Directors
Report.
The address of the registered office is Level 6, 197 St Georges Tce, Perth WA 6000.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(A) BASIS OF PREPARATION
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Accounting Standards and
other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board.
The financial report has been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain financial
assets, which have been measured at fair value through profit or loss.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars.
(B) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The financial report complies with Australian Accounting Standards as issued by the Australian
Accounting Standards Board and also International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Adoption of new accounting standards
In the current year, the Group has adopted all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations
issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (the AASB) that are relevant to its operations
and effective for annual reporting periods beginning on 1 July 2018. Other than the changes
described in note 38, the accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous
financial year.
(C) BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the parent entity and
its subsidiaries (“the Group”) as at 30 June each year. Control is achieved when the Group is
exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the
ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. Specifically, the Group controls
an investee if and only if the Group has:
• Power over the investee (existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant
activities of the investee);
• Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
• The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
46
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
When the Group has less than a majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee, the Group
considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee,
including:
• The contractual arrangement with the other vote holders of the investee;
• Rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
• The Group’s voting rights and potential voting rights.
The Group re-assesses whether it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that
there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary
begins when the Group obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses
control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or
disposed of during the year are included in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
from the date the Group gains control until the date the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.
When necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their
accounting policies into line with the Group’s accounting policies. All intercompany transactions
between members of the Group are eliminated in full on consolidation.
(D) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Functional and presentation currency
Both the functional and presentation currency of the Company and its Australian subsidiaries is
Australian dollars (A$).
Transactions and balances
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying the
exchange rates ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated
in foreign currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the reporting date.
All exchange differences are taken to the profit or loss.
(E) OPERATING SEGMENTS
An operating segment is a component of an entity that engages in business activities from
which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to
transactions with other components of the same entity), whose operating results are regularly
reviewed by management to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and
assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. This includes
start-up operations which are yet to earn revenues. Management will also consider other factors
in determining operating segments such as the existence of a line manager and the level of
segment information presented to the board of directors.
Operating segments have been identified based on the information provided by management
to the Board of Directors. The Group aggregates two or more operating segments when they
have similar economic characteristics. Operating segments that meet the quantitative criteria as
prescribed by AASB 8 are reported separately. However, an operating segment that does not meet
the quantitative criteria is still reported separately where information about the segment would
be useful to users of the financial statements.
Information about other business activities and operating segments that are below the quantitative
criteria are combined and disclosed in a separate category for “all other segments”.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
47
(F) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated statement of financial position comprise cash at
bank and in hand and short-term deposits that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash
and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
(G) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Policy prior to 1 July 2018 (Before adoption of AASB 9)
Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables were recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at
amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less an allowance for impairment.
Collectability of trade and other receivables was reviewed on an ongoing basis. Individual debts
that were known to be uncollectible were written off when identified. An impairment allowance
was recognised when there was objective evidence that the Group would not be able to collect
the receivable. Financial difficulties of the debtor, default payments or debts more than 60 days
overdue were considered objective evidence of impairment. The amount of the impairment loss
was the receivables carrying amount compared to the present value of estimated future cash
flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.
Available-for-sale financial assets
All available-for-sale financial assets were initially recognised at fair value plus directly attributable
transaction costs. Available-for-sale financial assets were those non-derivative financial assets,
principally equity securities that were designated as available-for-sale.
Investments were designated as available-for-sale if they did not have fixed maturities and fixed
and determinable payments and management intended to hold them for the medium to long
term. After initial recognition, available-for-sale financial assets were measured at fair value.
Gains or losses were recognised in other comprehensive income and presented as a separate
component of equity until the investment was sold, collected or otherwise disposed of, or until the
investment was determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously
reported in equity was included in profit or loss.
Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other payables were carried at amortised cost and due to their short-term
nature, were not discounted.
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings were initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received
less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and
borrowings were subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate
method
Policy applied from 1 July 2018 (Upon adoption of AASB 9)
Financial instruments - initial recognition and subsequent measurement
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial
liability or equity instrument of another entity. Certain commodity contracts are accounted for as
executory contracts and not recognised as financial instruments as these contracts were entered
into and continue to be held for the purpose of the delivery of gold bullion in accordance with the
Group’s expected sale requirements (see note 5).
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
48
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Financial assets
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets are classified at initial recognition, and subsequently measured at amortised
cost, or fair value through profit or loss or fair value through OCI.
The classification of financial assets at initial recognition that are debt instruments depends on
the financial asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics and the Group’s business model for
managing them. With the exception of trade receivables, the Group initially measures a financial
asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss,
transaction costs. In order for a financial asset to be classified and measured at amortised cost,
it needs to give rise to cash flows that are ‘solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI)’ on the
principal amount outstanding. This assessment is referred to as the SPPI test and is performed
at an instrument level.
Trade receivable that do not contain a significant financing component or for which the Group
has applied the practical expedient for contracts that have a maturity of one year or less, are
measured at the transaction price determined under AASB 15.
The Group’s business model for managing financial assets refers to how it manages its financial
assets in order to generate cash flows. The business model determines whether cash flows will
result from collecting contractual cash flows, selling the financial assets, or both.
Subsequent measurement
For purposes of subsequent measurement, the Group’s financial assets are classified in these
categories:
• Financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments)
• Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments)
The Group’s financial assets at amortised cost include cash, short-term deposits, and trade and
other receivables. The Group measures financial assets at amortised cost if both of the following
conditions are met:
• The financial asset is held within a business model with the objective to hold financial assets
in order to collect contractual cash flows, and
• The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding
Financial assets at amortised cost are subsequently measured using the effective interest rate
(EIR) method and are subject to impairment. Interest received is recognised as part of other
income in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. Gains and losses are recognised
in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised, modified or impaired.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets held for trading,
financial assets designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss, or financial
assets mandatorily required to be measured at fair value, i.e., where they fail the SPPI test.
Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling
or repurchasing in the near term. Derivatives, including separated embedded derivatives, are
also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments.
Financial assets with cash flows that do not pass the SPPI test are required to be classified, and
measured at fair value through profit or loss, irrespective of the business model.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
49
Notwithstanding the criteria for debt instruments to be classified at amortised cost or at fair
value through OCI, as described above, debt instruments may be designated at fair value through
profit or loss on initial recognition if doing so eliminates, or significantly reduces, an accounting
mismatch.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are carried in the statement of financial
position at fair value with net changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
Impairment of financial assets
The Group recognises an allowance for ECLs for all debt instruments not held at fair value
through profit or loss. ECLs are based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due in
accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Group expects to receive, discounted
at an approximation of the original EIR. The expected cash flows will include cash flows from the
sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.
ECLs are recognised in two stages. For credit exposures for which there has not been a significant
increase in credit risk since initial recognition, ECLs are provided for credit losses that result from
default events that are possible within the next 12-months (a 12-month ECL).
For those credit exposures for which there has been a significant increase in credit risk since
initial recognition, a loss allowance is required for credit losses expected over the remaining life
of the exposure, irrespective of the timing of the default (a lifetime ECL).
For trade receivables, the Group applies the simplified approach in calculating ECLs, as permitted
by AASB 9. Therefore, the Group does not track changes in credit risk, but instead, recognises a
loss allowance based on the financial asset’s lifetime ECL at each reporting date (see note 3). For
any other financial assets carried at amortised cost (which are due in more than 12 months), the
ECL is based on the 12-month ECL.
The 12-month ECL is the proportion of lifetime ECLs that results from default events on a financial
instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date. However, when there
has been a significant increase in credit risk since origination, the allowance will be based on
the lifetime ECL. When determining whether the credit risk of a financial asset has increased
significantly since initial recognition and when estimating ECLs, the Group considers reasonable
and supportable information that is relevant and available without undue cost or effort.
This includes both quantitative and qualitative information and analysis, based on the Group’s
historical experience and informed credit assessment including forward-looking information.
The Group considers a financial asset in default when contractual payments are 90 days past due.
However, in certain cases, the Group may also consider a financial asset to be in default when
internal or external information indicates that the Group is unlikely to receive the outstanding
contractual amounts in full before taking into account any credit enhancements held by the
Group. A financial asset is written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovering the
contractual cash flows and usually occurs when past due for more than one year and not subject
to enforcement activity.
At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether financial assets carried at amortised cost
are credit-impaired. A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a
detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset have occurred.
Financial Liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at fair value through
profit or loss, loans and borrowings, and payables as appropriate.
All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings
and payables, net of directly attributable transaction costs.
The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
50
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Subsequent measurement
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held for trading
and financial liabilities designated upon initial recognition as at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities are classified as held for trading if they are incurred for the purpose of
repurchasing in the near term. This category also includes derivative financial instruments
entered into by the Group that are not designated as hedging instruments in hedge relationships.
Gains or losses on liabilities held for trading are recognised in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income.
Loans, borrowings, and trade and other payables
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings and trade and other payables are
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the EIR method. Gains and losses are recognised
in the statement of comprehensive income when the liabilities are derecognised, as well as
through the EIR amortisation process.
Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and
fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs
in the statement of comprehensive income.
This category generally applies to interest-bearing loans and borrowings and trade and other
payables.
(H)
INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Cost includes expenditure incurred in acquiring and bringing the inventories to their existing
condition and location and is determined using the weighted average cost method.
(I) BORROWING COSTS
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying
asset (i.e. an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended
use or sale) are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. All other borrowing costs are expensed
in the period they occur. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs
in connection with the borrowing of funds.
(J) REHABILITATION COSTS
The Group is required to decommission and rehabilitate mines and processing sites at the end of
their producing lives to a condition acceptable to the relevant authorities.
The expected cost of any approved decommissioning or rehabilitation programme, discounted to
its net present value, is provided when the related environmental disturbance occurs. The cost is
capitalised when it gives rise to future benefits, whether the rehabilitation activity is expected to
occur over the life of the operation or at the time of closure. The capitalised cost is amortised over
the life of the operation and the increase in the net present value of the provision for the expected
cost is included in financing expenses.
Expected decommissioning and rehabilitation costs are based on the discounted value of the
estimated future cost of detailed plans prepared for each site. Where there is a change in the
expected decommissioning and restoration costs, the value of the provision and any related asset
are adjusted and the effect is recognised in profit or loss on a prospective basis over the remaining
life of the operation.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
51
The estimated costs of rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for
changes in legislation, technology or other circumstances. Cost estimates are not reduced by
potential proceeds from the sale of assets or from plant clean up at closure.
(K) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration
transferred in a business combination shall be measured at fair value, which shall be calculated
as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred by the acquirer, the
liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the equity issued by
the acquirer, and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business
combination, the acquirer measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair
value or at the appropriate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition-related
costs are expensed as incurred.
When the Group acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for
appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic
conditions, the Group’s operating or accounting policies and other pertinent conditions as at the
acquisition date. This includes the separation of embedded derivatives in the host contracts by
the acquiree.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer’s
previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured at fair value as at the acquisition
date through profit or loss.
Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at
the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which
is deemed to be an asset or liability will be recognised in accordance with AASB 139 either in
profit or loss or in other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classified as
equity, it shall not be remeasured, and subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity. In
instances, where the contingent consideration does not fall within the scope of AASB 139, it is
measured in accordance with the appropriate AASB.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interest over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the
fair value of the identifiable net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised in
profit or loss.
After initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is, from
the acquisition date, allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating units that are expected to
benefit from the combination, irrespective of whether other assets or liabilities of the acquiree
are assigned to those units.
Where goodwill forms part of a cash-generating unit and part of the operation within that unit
is disposed of, the goodwill associated with the operation disposed of is included in the carrying
amount of the operation when determining the gain or loss on disposal of the operation. Goodwill
disposed of in this circumstance is measured based on the relative value of the operation disposed
of and the portion of the cash-generating unit retained.
(L) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any
impairment in value.
Capital work-in-progress is stated at cost and comprises all costs directly attributable to bringing
the assets under construction ready to their intended use. Capital work-in-progress is transferred
to property, plant and equipment at cost on completion.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
52
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset, or
where appropriate, over the estimated life of the mine.
Major depreciation periods are:
• Mine specific plant and equipment is depreciated using – the shorter of life of mine and useful
life. Useful life ranges from 2 to 25 years.
• Buildings – the shorter of life of mine and useful life. Useful life ranges from 5 to 40 years.
• Office plant and equipment is depreciated at 33% per annum for computers and office
machines and 20% per annum for other office equipment and furniture.
Impairment
The carrying values of property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is
determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If any such indication exists and where the carrying values exceed the estimated recoverable
amount, the assets or cash-generating units are written down to their recoverable amount. Refer
to note 2(p) for further discussion on impairment testing performed by the Group.
Derecognition
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future
economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the
net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the profit and loss in the
period the item is derecognised.
(M) EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE
Expenditure on acquisition, exploration and evaluation relating to an area of interest is carried
forward at cost where rights to tenure of the area of interest are current and:
•
it is expected that expenditure will be recouped through successful development and
exploitation of the area of interest or alternatively by its sale; and/or
• exploration and evaluation activities are continuing in an area of interest but at reporting date
have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or
otherwise of economically recoverable reserves.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of
continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. Where uncertainty exists as
to the future viability of certain areas, the value of the area of interest is written off to the profit
and loss or provided against.
Impairment
The carrying value of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is assessed for impairment
on a regular basis or whenever impairment indicators are present. When information becomes
available suggesting that the recovery of expenditure which had previously been capitalised is
unlikely or that the Group no longer holds tenure, the relevant capitalised amount is written off to
the profit or loss in the period when the new information becomes available.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
53
(N) MINE PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT
Expenditure on the acquisition and development of mine properties within an area of interest are
carried forward at cost separately for each area of interest. This includes the costs associated
with waste removal (stripping costs) in the creation of improved access and mining flexibility in
relation to the ore to be mined in the future. Accumulated expenditure is amortised over the life
of the area of interest to which such costs relate on a production output basis.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of
continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest.
Impairment
The carrying value of capitalised mine properties and development expenditure is assessed for
impairment whenever facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the asset
may exceed its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate
cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. When
the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered
impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. Refer to note 2(p) for further discussion
on impairment testing performed by the Group.
Stripping (waste removal) costs
As part of its mining operations, the Group incurs stripping (waste removal) costs both during
the development phase and production phase of its operations. Stripping costs incurred in the
development phase of a mine, before the production phase commences (development stripping),
are capitalised as part of the cost of constructing the mine and subsequently amortised over its
useful life using a unit of production (“UOP”) method. The capitalisation of development stripping
costs ceases when the mine/component is commissioned and ready for use as intended by
management.
Stripping activities undertaken during the production phase of a surface mine (production
stripping) are accounted for as set out below. After the commencement of production, further
development of the mine may require a phase of unusually high stripping that is similar in nature
to development phase stripping. The cost of such stripping is accounted for in the same way as
development stripping (as outlined above).
Production stripping is generally considered to create two benefits, being either the production of
inventory or improved access to the ore to be mined in the future. Where the benefits are realised
in the form of inventory produced in the period, the production stripping costs are accounted for
as part of the cost of producing those inventories.
Where the benefits are realised in the form of improved access to ore to be mined in the future,
the costs are recognised as a non-current asset, referred to as a ‘stripping activity asset’, if the
following criteria are met:
• Future economic benefits (being improved access to the ore body) are probable
• The component of the ore body for which access will be improved can be accurately identified
• The costs associated with the improved access can be reliably measured
If any of the criteria are not met, the production stripping costs are charged to profit or loss as
operating costs as they are incurred.
In identifying components of the ore body, the Group works closely with the mining operations
personnel for each mining operation to analyse each of the mine plans. Generally, a component
will be a subset of the total ore body, and a mine may have several components. The mine plans,
and therefore the identification of components, can vary between mines for a number of reasons.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
54
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
These include, but are not limited to the type of commodity, the geological characteristics of
the ore body, the geographical location, and/or financial considerations. Given the nature of
the Group’s operations, components are generally either major pushbacks or phases and they
generally form part of a larger investment decision which requires board approval.
The stripping activity asset is initially measured at cost, which is the accumulation of costs directly
incurred to perform the stripping activity that improves access to the identified component of ore,
plus an allocation of directly attributable overhead costs.
If incidental operations are occurring at the same time as the production stripping activity, but
are not necessary for the production stripping activity to continue as planned, these costs are not
included in the cost of the stripping activity asset.
If the costs of the inventory produced and the stripping activity asset are not separately identifiable,
a relevant production measure is used to allocate the production stripping costs between the
inventory produced and the stripping activity asset. This production measure is calculated for the
identified component of the ore body and is used as a benchmark to identify the extent to which
the additional activity of creating a future benefit has taken place. The Group uses the expected
volume of waste extracted compared with the actual volume for a given volume of ore production
of each component.
The stripping activity asset is accounted for as an addition to, or an enhancement of, an existing
asset, being the mine asset, and is presented as part of ’Mine properties’ in the statement of
financial position. This forms part of the total investment in the relevant cash generating unit(s),
which is reviewed for impairment if events or changes of circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable.
The stripping activity asset is subsequently depreciated using the UOP method over the life of the
identified component of the ore body that became more accessible as a result of the stripping
activity. Economically recoverable reserves, which comprise proven and probable reserves,
are used to determine the expected useful life of the identified component of the ore body. The
stripping activity asset is then carried at cost less depreciation and any impairment losses.
(O) NON-CURRENT ASSETS AND DISPOSAL GROUPS HELD FOR SALE AND
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale and measured at the lower
of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell if their carrying amount will be recovered
principally through a sale transaction. They are not depreciated or amortised. For an asset or
disposal group to be classified as held for sale it must be available for immediate sale in its
present condition and its sale must be highly probable.
An impairment loss is recognised for any initial or subsequent write-down of the asset (or disposal
group) to fair value less costs to sell. A gain is recognised for any subsequent increases in fair
value less costs to sell of an asset (or disposal group), but is not in excess of any cumulative
impairment loss previously recognised.
A gain or loss not previously recognised by the date of the sale of the non-current asset (or
disposal group) is recognised as the date of de-recognition.
A discontinued operation is a component of the Group that has been disposed of or is classified
as held for sale and that represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of
operations, is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of such a line of business or area of
operations, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale. The results of discontinued
operations are presented separately on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income and the assets and liabilities are presented separately on the face of the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
55
(P)
IMPAIRMENT OF NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS
The Group assesses, at each reporting date, whether there is an indication that an asset may be
impaired. If any indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the
Group estimates the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of
an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s (“CGU”) fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”) and its
value in use (“VIU”).
Recoverable amount is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate
cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets. When
the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered
impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
In assessing VIU, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a
pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and
the risks specific to the asset or CGU. In determining FVLCD, recent market transactions are
taken into account. If no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model is
used.
The Group bases its impairment calculation on detailed budgets and forecasts, which are prepared
separately for each of the Group’s CGUs to which the individual assets are allocated, based on
the life-of-mine plans. The estimated cash flows are based on expected future production, metal
selling prices, operating costs and forecast capital expenditure based on life-of-mine plans.
VIU does not reflect future cash flows associated with improving or enhancing an asset’s
performance, whereas anticipated enhancements to assets are included in FVLCD calculations.
Impairment losses of continuing operations, including impairment on inventories, are recognised
in the profit and loss. For such properties, the impairment is recognised in other comprehensive
income up to the amount of any previous revaluation.
For assets, an assessment is made at each reporting date to determine whether there is an
indication that previously recognised impairment losses no longer exist or have decreased. If
such indication exists, the Group estimates the asset’s or CGU’s recoverable amount. A previously
recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the assumptions used
to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised.
The reversal is limited so that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed its recoverable
amount, nor exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation,
had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised
in profit or loss.
(Q) PROVISIONS
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a
result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits
will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the
obligation.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure
required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date. The discount rate used to determine
the present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the
risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision resulting from the passage of time is
recognised in finance costs.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
56
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
(R) LEASES
Leases are classified at their inception as either operating or finance leases based on the economic
substance of the agreement so as to reflect the risks and benefits incidental to ownership.
Operating Leases
The minimum lease payments of operating leases, where the lessor effectively retains substantially
all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the leased item, are recognised as an expense in profit
and loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Contingent rentals are recognised as an expense in the financial year in which they are incurred.
Finance Leases
Leases which effectively transfer substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership
of the leased item to the Group are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the
leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments.
Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability
so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance
charges are charged directly to profit and loss.
Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset or where
appropriate, over the estimated life of the mine.
The cost of improvements to or on leasehold property is capitalised, disclosed as leasehold
improvements, and amortised over the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives
of the improvements, whichever is the shorter.
(S)
INTEREST REVENUE
Revenue is recognised using the effective interest method. This is a method of calculating the
amortised cost of a financial asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period
using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash
receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount of the financial
asset.
(T) REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
Policy prior to 1 July 2018 (before adoption of AASB 15)
Revenue was measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable to the extent
it was probable that the economic benefits would flow to the Group and the revenue could be
reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria had to be met before revenue was
recognised:
Gold bullion sales
Revenue from gold production was recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership
have passed to the buyer.
Mining and contracting services
Revenue from mining and contracting services was recognised in respect of the provision of
contract mining services to third parties.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
57
Policy applied from 1 July 2018 (upon adoption of AASB 15)
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognised when control of the goods or services are
transferred to the customer at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Group
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Group has concluded that it
is the principal in its revenue contracts because it typically controls the goods or services before
transferring them to the customer.
Gold bullion sales
For bullion sales, most of this is sold under a long-term sales contract with the refiner, forward
sale agreements with various banks or a pre-pay facility with Citibank N.A.. The only performance
obligation under the contract is the sale of gold bullion. Revenue from bullion sales is recognised
at a point in time when control passes to the buyer. This generally occurs after the unrefined doré
is outturned and the Group either instructs the refiner to purchase the outturned fine metal or
advises the refiner to transfer the gold to the bank by crediting the metal account of the bank.
As all performance obligations are satisfied at that time, there are no remaining performance
obligations under the contract. The transaction price is determined at transaction date and there
are no further adjustments to this price.
A contract liability is the obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the Group
has received consideration from the customer. If a customer pays consideration before the Group
transfers goods or services to the customer, a contract liability is recognised when the payment is
made or the payment is due (whichever is earlier). Contract liabilities are recognised as revenue
when the Group performs under the contract. The Group applies the practical expedient to not
adjust the promised consideration for the effects of a significant financing component where the
period between the transfer of the refined gold to a customer and the receipt of the advance is one
year or less. For long-term advances from customers the transaction price is discounted, using
the rate that would be reflected in a separate transaction between the Group and its customers at
contract inception, to take into consideration the significant financing component.
Mining and contracting services.
Mining and contracting services is the provision of equipment and personnel to carry out mining
activities on behalf of the customer.
These contracts are assessed to have multiple performance obligation as each equipment and
service are capable of being distinct and separately identifiable. Revenue is recognised over time
as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Group as the
services are rendered.
The transaction price for each contract is based on an agreed schedule of rates to which the
Group is entitled.
(U) EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent, adjusted
to exclude any costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends,
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated as net profit attributable to members of the parent
adjusted for:
•
•
cost of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;
the after-tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares
that have been recognised; and
• other non-discriminatory changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would
result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares divided by the weighted average number
of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares; adjusted for any bonus element.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
58
(V)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
ISSUED CAPITAL
Issued and paid up capital is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received by the
Group. Any transaction costs arising on the issue of ordinary shares are recognised directly in
equity as a reduction in the proceeds received.
(W) SHARE-BASED PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS
The Group provides benefits to employees (including Directors) in the form of share-based
payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over
shares (equity-settled transactions). The Group has one plan in place that provides these benefits.
It is the Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) which provides benefits to all employees including
Directors.
In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any vesting conditions (such as
service conditions), other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of Westgold Resources
Limited (market conditions) if applicable.
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair
value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by using either a Black
& Scholes or a Monte Carlo model as appropriate. Further details of which are given in note 28.
The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase
in equity, over the period in which the performance and/or service conditions are fulfilled (the
vesting period), ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the
award (the vesting date).
At each subsequent reporting date until vesting, the cumulative charge to the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income is the product of (i) the grant date fair value of the award; (ii)
the current best estimate of the number of awards that will vest, taking into account such factors
as the likelihood of employee turnover during the vesting period and the likelihood of non-market
performance conditions being met; and (iii) the expired portion of the vesting period.
The charge to profit and loss for the period is the cumulative amount as calculated above, less the
amounts already charged in previous periods. There is a corresponding credit to equity.
Until an award has vested, any amounts recorded are contingent and will be adjusted if more
or fewer awards vest than were originally anticipated to do so. Any award subject to a market
condition is considered to vest irrespective of whether or not the market condition is fulfilled,
provided that all other conditions are satisfied.
If a non-vesting condition is within the control of the Group, Company or the employee, the failure
to satisfy the condition is treated as a cancellation. If a non-vesting condition within the control of
neither the Group, Company nor employee is not satisfied during the vesting period, any expense
for the award not previously recognised is recognised over the remaining vesting period, unless
the award is forfeited.
If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as
if the terms had not been modified. An additional expense is recognised for any modification that
increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial
to the employee, as measured at the date of modification.
If an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation,
and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately.
However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and designated as a replacement
award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a
modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
59
The dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding options is reflected as additional share dilution in the
computation of dilutive earnings per share.
(X) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Wages, salaries, sick leave and other short-term benefits
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, accumulating sick leave and
other short-term benefits expected to be settled wholly within 12 months of the reporting date are
recognised in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date. They are measured at the
amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised and measured as the present value of expected
future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date
using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to the expected future wage and
salary levels, experience of employee departure and periods of service. Expected future payments
are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on high quality corporate bonds with
terms to maturity and currencies that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash
outflows.
Superannuation
Contributions made by the Group to employee superannuation funds, which are defined
contribution plans, are charged as an expense when incurred.
(Y) ONEROUS OPERATING LEASE PROVISION
A provision for an onerous operating lease is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived
from the lease are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting the obligations under the lease.
The provision is measured at the lessor of the present value of the expected net cost of continuing
with the lease and the net cost to exit the lease.
(Z) OTHER TAXES
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except:
• when the GST incurred on purchase of goods or services is not recoverable from the taxation
authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or
as part of the expense item as applicable; and
•
receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part
of receivables or payables in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
Cash flows are included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis and the
GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable
from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of amounts of GST recoverable from, or
payable to, the taxation authority.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
60
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
(AA) INCOME TAX
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the
amount expected to be recovered from, or paid to, the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax
laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the
reporting date in the countries where the Group operates and generates taxable income.
Current income tax relating to items recognised directly in other comprehensive income or equity
is recognised in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management
periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations where applicable
tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.
Deferred tax is provided for using the full liability balance sheet approach.
The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities are
those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date in the countries where the
Group operates and generates taxable profits.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except to the extent
that the deferred tax liability arises from:
•
•
•
the initial recognition of goodwill;
the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination
and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit (or
tax loss); and
taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and
interests in joint ventures when the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can
be controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse
in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, including carry-
forward tax losses and tax credits, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be
available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilised except when:
•
•
the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial
recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and,
at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit (or tax
loss); and
the deductible temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates
and interests in joint ventures and it is not probable that the temporary difference will reverse
in the foreseeable future.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part
of the deferred tax asset to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are reassessed at each reporting
date and are recognised to the extent that they satisfy the requirements for recognition.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists
to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and deferred
tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on the same taxable
entity.
Income taxes relating to transactions recognised outside profit and loss (for example, directly
in other comprehensive income or directly in equity) are also recognised outside profit and loss.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
61
Tax consolidation
Westgold Resources Limited and its wholly owned Australian resident subsidiaries formed a tax
consolidated group (“the Tax Group”) with effect from 1 December 2016. Members of the Tax
Group have entered into a tax sharing agreement, which provides for the allocation of income tax
liabilities between members of the Tax Group should the parent, Westgold Resources Limited,
default on its tax payments obligations.
The Group has applied the group allocation approach in determining the appropriate amount of
current taxes and deferred taxes to allocate to members of the tax consolidated group. Members of
the tax consolidated group have entered into a tax funding agreement. The tax funding agreement
provides for the allocation of current taxes to members of the tax consolidated group.
The allocation of taxes under the tax funding agreement is recognised as an increase/decrease
in the controlled entities intercompany accounts with the tax consolidated group head company,
Westgold Resources Limited. The nature of the tax funding agreement is such that no tax
consolidation adjustments are required.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES
AND ASSUMPTIONS
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management
continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent
liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements and estimates on historical
experience and on other various factors it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
result of which form the basis of the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources.
Management has identified the following critical accounting policies for which significant
judgements have been made as well as the following key estimates and assumptions that have
the most significant impact on the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions and conditions and may materially affect financial results
or the financial position reported in future periods.
Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be found in the relevant
notes to the financial statements.
SIGNIFICANT JUDGMENTS
Revenue from contracts with customers
Judgement is required to determine the point at which the customer obtains control of gold.
Factors including transfer of legal title, transfer of significant risks and rewards of ownership
and the existence of a present right to payment for the gold typically result in control transferring
upon allocation of the gold to the customers’ account.
Financing component relating to unearned income
In determining the finance component related to unearned income for a facility which extends
beyond 12 months, the Group concluded that the interest rate implicit in the contract (i.e. the
interest rate that discounts the cash selling price of the gold bullion, being the spot price at
contract inception, to the amount paid in advance) is appropriate because it is commensurate
with the rate that would be reflected in a separate financing transaction between the Group and
its customer at contract inception.
Mine properties and development - stripping costs
Significant judgement is required to distinguish between development stripping and production
stripping and to distinguish between the production stripping that relates to the extraction of
inventory and that which relates to the creation of a stripping activity asset.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
62
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES
AND ASSUMPTIONS (CONTINUED)
Once the Group has identified its production stripping for each surface mining operation, it
identifies the separate components of the ore bodies for each of its mining operations. An
identifiable component is a specific volume of the ore body that is made more accessible by the
stripping activity. Significant judgement is required to identify and define these components, and
also to determine the expected volumes (e.g., in tonnes) of waste to be stripped and ore to be
mined in each of these components.
These assessments are undertaken for each individual mining operation based on the information
available in the mine plan. The mine plans and, therefore, the identification of components, will
vary between mines for a number of reasons. These include, but are not limited to, the type
of commodity, the geological characteristics of the ore body, the geographical location and/or
financial considerations.
Judgement is also required to identify a suitable production measure to be used to allocate
production stripping costs between inventory and any stripping activity asset(s) for each
component. The Group considers that the ratio of the expected volume (e.g., in tonnes) of waste to
be stripped for an expected volume (e.g., in tonnes) of ore to be mined for a specific component of
the ore body, is the most suitable production measure. Furthermore, judgements and estimates
are also used to apply the UOP method in determining the depreciable lives of the stripping
activity asset(s).
There are a number of uncertainties inherent in estimating the carrying value of mine properties
and development and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly
when new information becomes available. Changes in the forecast price of commodities, exchange
rates, production costs or recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and may
ultimately, result in the requirement to restate the carrying value.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
Determination of mineral resources and ore reserves
The determination of reserves impacts the accounting for asset carrying values, depreciation
and amortisation rates and provisions for mine rehabilitation. The Group estimates its mineral
resource and reserves in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 2012 (the “JORC code”). The information on mineral
resources and ore reserves were prepared by or under the supervision of Competent Persons as
defined in the JORC code. The amounts presented are based on the mineral resources and ore
reserves determined under the JORC code.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral resources and ore reserves
and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new
information becomes available.
Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery
rates may change the economic status of reserves and may ultimately, result in the reserves
being restated.
Mine rehabilitation provision
The Group assesses its mine rehabilitation provision on an annual basis in accordance with the
accounting policy stated in note 2(j). In determining an appropriate level of provision consideration
is given to the expected future costs to be incurred, the timing of those future costs (largely
dependent on the life of mine) and the estimated level of inflation. The ultimate rehabilitation
costs are uncertain, and cost estimates can vary in response to many factors, including estimates
of the extent and costs of rehabilitation activities, technological changes, regulatory changes,
timing, cost increases as compared to the inflation rate of 1.6% (2018: 2.1%), and changes in
discount rates. The applicable discount rates are based on the expected life of mine for each
operation.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
63
The expected timing of expenditure can also change, for example in response to changes in
reserves or production rates. These uncertainties may result in future actual expenditure differing
from the amounts currently provided. Therefore, significant estimates and assumptions are
made in determining the provision for mine rehabilitation. As a result, there could be significant
adjustments to the provisions established which would affect future financial result. The provision
at reporting date represents management’s best estimate of the present value of the future
rehabilitation costs required.
Impairment of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure
The future recoverability of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is dependent on
various factors, including whether the Group decides to exploit the related area interest itself or,
if not, whether it successfully recovers the related exploration and evaluation asset through sale.
Factors that could impact the future recoverability include the level of reserves and resources,
future technological changes, which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes
(including changes to environmental restoration obligations) and changes to commodity prices.
To the extent that capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is determined not to
be recoverable in the future, profits and net assets will be reduced in the period in which this
determination is made.
In addition, exploration and evaluation expenditure is capitalised if activities in the area of interest
have not yet reached a stage that permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise
of economically recoverable reserves. To the extent it is determined in the future that this
capitalised expenditure should be written off, profits and net assets will be reduced in the period
in which this determination is made.
Impairment of capitalised mine development expenditure, property, plant and equipment
The future recoverability of capitalised mine development expenditure, property, plant and
equipment is dependent on a number of factors, including the level of proved and probable
reserves, and the likelihood of progressive upgrade of mineral resources in to reserves over time.
In addition, consideration is given to future technological changes, which could impact the cost,
future legal changes (including changes to environmental restoration obligations), and changes
in commodity prices.
Non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment if there is any indication that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable.
When applicable, FVLCD is estimated based on discounted cash flows using market based
commodity prices and foreign exchange rate assumptions, estimated quantities of recoverable
minerals, production levels, operating costs and capital requirements, based on the relevant
CGU’s life-of-mine (LOM) plans. Consideration is also given to analysts’ valuations The fair value
methodology adopted is categorised as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
In determining the VIU, future cash flows for each CGU (i.e. each mine site) are prepared utilising
management’s latest estimates of:
•
•
•
•
•
the quantities of ore reserves and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of
confidence of economic extraction;
royalties and taxation;
future production levels;
future commodity prices;
future cash costs of production and development expenditure; and
• other relevant cash inflows and outflows.
Cash flow scenarios for a range of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates are assessed
using internal and external market forecasts, and the present value of the forecast cash flows is
determined utilising a pre-tax discount rate.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
64
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES
AND ASSUMPTIONS (CONTINUED)
The Group’s cash flows are most sensitive to movements in commodity price, expected quantities
of ore reserves and mineral resources and key operating costs. In particular, CGO, MGO and FGO
are most sensitive to expected quantities of ore reserves and mineral resources to be extracted
and therefore the estimated future cash inflows resulting from the sale of product produced is
dependent on these assumptions. Variations to the expected cash flows, and the timing thereof,
could result in significant changes to any impairment losses recognised, if any, which in turn
could impact future financial results.
To the extent that capitalised mine development expenditure is determined not to be recoverable
in the future, this will reduce profit in the period in which the Group makes this determination.
Capitalised mine development expenditure is assessed for recoverability in a manner consistent
with property, plant and equipment as described below.
Refer to note 2(p) for further discussion on the impairment assessment process undertaken by
the Group.
Life of mine method of amortisation and depreciation
Estimated economically recoverable reserves are used in determining the depreciation of
mine-specific assets. This results in a depreciation charge proportional to the depletion of the
anticipated remaining life-of-mine production. The life of each item, which is assessed at least
annually, has regard to both its physical life limitations and present assessments of economically
recoverable reserves of the mine property at which the asset is located.
These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions, including the amount of
recoverable reserves and estimates of future capital expenditure. The calculation of the UOP rate
of depreciation could be impacted to the extent that actual production in the future is different
from current forecast production based on economically recoverable reserves, or if future capital
expenditure estimates change. Changes to economically recoverable reserves could arise due to
changes in the factors or assumptions used in estimating reserves, including:
• The effect on economically recoverable reserves for differences between actual commodity
prices and commodity price assumptions
• Unforeseen operational issues
• Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.
Share-based payment transactions
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to
the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is
determined by using an appropriate valuation, using the assumptions as discussed in note 28. The
accounting estimates and assumptions relating to equity-settled share-based payments would
have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the next annual reporting
period but may impact expenses and equity.
Provision for expected credit losses (ECLs) on trade receivables and other short-term
receivables carried at amortised cost
The Group uses a provision matrix to calculate ECLs for trade and other short-term receivables
carried at amortised cost. The provision rates are based on days past due.
The provision matrix is initially based on the Group’s historical observed default rates. The
Group calibrates the matrix to adjust the historical credit loss experience with forward-looking
information. For instance, if forecast economic conditions are expected to deteriorate over the
next year, which can lead to an increased number of defaults, the historical default rates are
adjusted. At every reporting date, the historical observed default rates are updated and changes
in the forward-looking estimates are analysed.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
65
The assessment of the correlation between historical observed default rates, forecast economic
conditions and ECLs is a key estimate. The amount of ECLs is sensitive to changes in circumstances
and of forecast economic conditions. The Group’s historical credit loss experience and forecast
of economic conditions may also not be representative of customer’s actual default in the future.
4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES
The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise receivables, trade and other payables,
finance lease and hire purchase contracts, cash and cash equivalents, deposits and equity
investments.
Risk exposures and responses
The Group manages its exposure to key financial risks in accordance with the Group’s financial
risk management policy. The objective of the policy is to support the delivery of the Group’s
financial targets while protecting future financial security.
The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are interest rate risk, credit risk,
equity price risk and liquidity risk. The Group uses different methods to measure and manage
different types of risks to which it is exposed. These include monitoring levels of exposure to
interest rate, foreign exchange risk and assessments of market forecasts for interest rate, foreign
exchange and commodity prices. Ageing analysis and monitoring of receivables are undertaken
to manage credit risk, liquidity risk is monitored through the development of future rolling cash
flow forecasts.
The board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks as summarised below.
Primary responsibility for identification and control of financial risks rests with the Board. The
Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of the risks identified below, including for
interest rate risk, credit allowances and cash flow forecast projections.
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria
for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are
recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are
disclosed in note 2 to the financial statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
66
4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Interest Rate Risk
(a)
The Group’s exposure to risks of changes in market interest rates relate primarily to the Group’s
interest-bearing liabilities and cash balances. The level of debt is disclosed in notes 22 and 23.
The Group’s policy is to manage its interest cost using fixed rate debt. Therefore, the Group does
not have any variable interest rate risk on its debt. The Group constantly analyses its interest rate
exposure. Within this analysis, consideration is given to potential renewals of existing positions,
alternative financing positions and the mix of fixed and variable interest rates. There is no
significant exposure to changes in market interest rates at the reporting date.
At the reporting date the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk for classes of financial assets and
financial liabilities is set out below.
2019
Financial Assets
Floating interest
rate
Fixed interest
Non-interest
bearing
Total carrying
amount
Cash and cash equivalents
67,196,289
Trade and other receivables
Other financial assets
-
-
-
-
1,427,836
-
6,992,121
-
67,196,289
6,992,121
1,427,836
67,196,289
1,427,836
6,992,121
75,616,246
Financial Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing liabilities
-
-
-
-
(57,741,966)
(36,736,877)
-
(57,741,966)
(36,736,877)
(36,736,877)
(57,491,966)
(94,478,843)
Net financial liabilities
(18,862,597)
2018
Financial Assets
Floating
interest rate
Fixed interest
Non-Interest
bearing
Total carrying
amount
Cash and cash equivalents
73,446,753
Trade and other receivables
Other financial assets
-
-
-
-
1,286,546
-
19,905,830
-
73,446,753
19,905,830
1,286,546
73,446,753
1,286,546
19,905,830
94,639,129
Financial Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing liabilities
Net financial liabilities
Interest rate risk exposure
-
-
-
-
(85,208,108)
(30,648,318)
-
(85,208,108)
(30,648,318)
(30,648,318)
(85,208,108)
(115,856,426)
(21,217,297)
Post tax profit
higher (lower)
Other Comprehensive Income
higher (lower)
30 June 2019
30 June 2018
30 June 2019
30 June 2018
Judgements of reasonably possible movements:
+ 0.5% (50 basis points)
- 0.5% (50 basis points)
235,187
(235,187)
257,064
(257,064)
-
-
-
-
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
67
(b)
Credit Risk
Credit risk arises from the financial assets of the Group, which comprises cash and cash
equivalents, trade and other receivables and other financial assets held as security and loans.
Cash and cash equivalents are held with National Australia Bank, which is an Australian Bank
with an AA- credit rating (Standard & Poor’s).
The Group’s exposure to credit risk arises from potential default of the counter party, with the
maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of the financial assets (as outlined in each
applicable note).
The Group does not hold any credit derivatives to offset its credit exposure.
The Group trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties and as such collateral is not
requested nor is it the Group’s policy to securitise its trade and other receivables.
Receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group does not
have a significant exposure to bad debts.
Significant concentrations of credit risk are in relation to cash and cash equivalents with Australian
banks.
(c)
Price Risk
Equity Security Price Risk
Group revenue is exposed to equity security price fluctuations arising from investments in equity
securities. Refer to note 15 for details of equity investments at fair value through profit or loss
held at 30 June 2019 (2018 – available-for-sale investments).
The Group has a number of equity investments, which have shown volatility in price movements
over the year. If security prices varied by 20%, with all other variables held constant, the impact
on post tax profits and equity at 30 June, is reflected below:
Post tax profit
Other Comprehensive Income
higher (lower)
higher (lower)
2019
2018
2019
2018
Judgements of reasonably possible movements:
Price + 20%
Price - 20%
5,769,514
-
(5,769,514)
(877,402)
-
-
877,402
-
The selected sensitivity of +20% or -20% is considered reasonable given recent fluctuations in
equity prices and management’s expectations of future movements. The movements in other
comprehensive income for 2018 are due to possible higher or lower equity security prices from
investments in equity securities that were classified as available-for-sale financial assets in 2018.
The overall sensitivity for post-tax profits in 2019 is higher due to the company owning financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss (refer to note 15).
(d)
Commodity Price Risk
The Group’s operations are exposed to commodity price fluctuations. The Group has a commodity
risk management hedging policy that authorises management to enter into price protection
contracts to ensure revenue streams up to 60% of gold sales for up to three years of forecast
production.
At the end of the financial year, the Group had unrecognised sales contracts for 183,500 ounces
at an average price of $1,827.21 per ounce ending in December 2020, which the Group will deliver
physical gold to settle. There was therefore no exposure on recognised financial instruments at
the balance sheet date.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
68
4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Liquidity Risk
(e)
Liquidity risk arises from the financial liabilities of the Group and the subsequent ability to meet
the obligations to repay the financial liabilities as and when they fall due.
The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through
the use of finance and hire purchase leases.
The table below reflects all contractually fixed payables for settlement, repayment and interest
resulting from recognised financial liabilities as of 30 June 2019. Cash flows for financial liabilities
without fixed amount or timing are based on the conditions existing as 30 June.
The remaining contractual maturities of the Group’s financial liabilities are:
6 months or less
6 - 12 months
1 - 5 years
Over 5 years
2019
2018
(67,993,428)
(9,104,584)
(19,562,452)
-
(96,660,464)
(95,516,153)
(7,425,843)
(14,580,329)
-
(117,522,325)
Maturity analysis of financial assets and liabilities based on management’s expectation.
The risk implied from the values shown in the table below reflects a balanced view of cash
inflows and outflows. Leasing obligations, trade payables and other financial liabilities mainly
originate from the financing of assets used in our ongoing operations such as property, plant,
equipment and investments of working capital e.g. inventories and trade receivables. To monitor
existing financial assets and liabilities, as well as to enable effective controlling of future risks,
management monitors its Group’s expected settlement of financial assets and liabilities on an
ongoing basis.
2019
<6 months
6-12 months
1-5 years
Total
Financial assets
Cash and equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other financial assets
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing loans
67,982,985
6,992,121
1,427,836
76,402,942
(57,741,966)
(10,251,462)
(67,993,428)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
67,982,985
6,992,121
1,427,836
76,402,942
(9,104,584)
(19,562,452)
(38,918,498)
(9,104,584)
(19,562,452)
(96,660,464)
(57,741,966)
Net inflow (outflow)
8,409,514
(9,104,584)
(19,562,452)
(20,257,522)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
69
2018
<6 months
6-12 months
1-5 years
Total
Financial assets
Cash and equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other financial assets
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing loans
74,693,563
19,905,830
1,286,546
95,885,939
(85,208,108)
(10,308,045)
(95,516,153)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
74,693,563
19,905,830
1,286,546
95,885,939
(85,208,108)
(7,425,843)
(14,580,329)
(32,314,217)
(7,425,843)
(14,580,329)
(117,522,325)
Net inflow (outflow)
369,786
(7,425,843)
(14,580,329)
(21,636,386)
(f)
Fair Values
For all financial assets and liabilities recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position, carrying amount approximates fair value unless otherwise stated in the applicable notes.
The methods for estimating fair value are outlined in the relevant notes to the financial statements.
The Group uses various methods in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument. The
methods comprise:
Level 1 – the fair value is calculated using quoted prices in active markets.
Level 2 - the fair value is estimated using inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from price).
Level 3 – the fair value is estimated using inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on
observable market data.
The fair value of the financial instruments as well as the methods used to estimate the fair value
are summarised in the table below.
2019
Quoted market
price (Level 1)
Financial Assets
Instruments carried at fair value
Listed investments
Royalties receivable
Financial liabilities
Fair value disclosures
Long-term borrowings
41,210,813
-
-
Valuation
technique
market
observable
inputs (Level 2)
Valuation
technique
non market
observable
inputs (Level 3)
Total
-
-
-
15,000,000
41,210,813
15,000,000
(18,465,857)
-
(18,465,857)
41,210,813
(18,465,857)
15,000,000
37,744,956
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
70
4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES AND
POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Fair Values (Continued)
(f)
2018
Quoted market
price (Level 1)
Valuation
technique
market
observable
inputs (Level 2)
Valuation
technique
non market
observable
inputs (Level 3)
Total
Financial Assets
Instruments carried at fair value
Listed investments
Royalties receivable
Financial liabilities
Fair value disclosures
Long-term borrowings
6,267,158
-
-
(13,828,667)
6,267,158
(13,828,667)
-
-
-
6,267,158
(13,828,667)
(7,561,509)
Quoted market price represents the fair value of listed investments determined based on quoted
prices on active markets as at the reporting date without any deduction for transaction costs.
The fair value of royalties receivable is valued based on discounted cash flow model.
The fair value of long-term borrowings is based on fixed lease interest rates.
Transfer between categories
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, and no transfers into and out of Level 3 fair
value measurement.
(g)
Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities
Current obligations under
finance leases
Non-current obligations
under finance leases
Total liabilities from
financing activities
Current obligations under
finance leases
Non-current obligations
under finance leases
Total liabilities from
financing activities
1 July 2018
Cash flows
New
leases
Reclassification
adjustment
30 June
2019
16,819,651
(20,848,905)
4,029,254
18,271,020
18,271,020
13,828,667
-
22,908,210
(18,271,020)
18,465,857
30,648,318
(20,848,905) 26,937,464
- 36,736,877
1 July 2017
Cash flows
New
Reclassification
30 June
leases
adjustment
2018
5,259,259
(15,731,604)
10,112,345
16,809,651
16,819,651
5,194,528
- 25,453,790
(16,819,651)
13,828,667
10,453,787
(15,731,604) 35,566,135
- 30,648,318
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
71
5. REVENUE
Sale of gold at spot
Sale of gold under forward contracts
Sale of gold under a prepay facility (refer note 24)
Mining and contracting services
Total revenue from contracts with customers
2019
2018
160,727,868
87,650,431
215,904,789
156,001,253
16,011,946
21,879,500
25,672,844
11,298,099
418,317,447
276,829,283
Disaggregated revenue per segment has been disclosed in note 32. The prior year comparatives have not
been restated for the requirements of AASB 15 (see note 2 (b)).
No revenue was recognised during the period for performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.
The transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations under forward contracts not recognised
at the balance sheet date at 30 June 2019 is as follows:
Gold forward contracts
- Within 1 year
- 1 to 2 years
247,844,578
246,923,675
113,322,000
105,768,000
361,166,578
352,691,675
The amounts due within one year include unearned income of $25,470,487 (refer note 24) which has been
prepaid, the balance is for delivery of gold which will be paid within 3 days of delivery.
6. OTHER INCOME
Interest income calculated using the effective interest rate method
308,101
571,184
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale financial assets
Net gain on sale of assets
Other income
Total other income
-
1,446,807
139,435
-
5,072,351
3,130,446
5,519,887
5,148,437
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
72
7. EXPENSES
(a) Cost of sales
Salaries, wages expense and other employee benefits
Superannuation expense
Operating lease rentals
Other production costs
2019
2018
107,906,822
73,675,461
10,251,148
6,999,169
5,065,998
8,179,607
148,191,774
119,747,908
Write down in value of inventories to estimated net realisable value
-
1,397,502
Royalty expense
14,982,184
11,270,110
Contract mining services
Salaries, wages expense and other employee benefits
Superannuation expense
Mining and contracting service costs
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Depreciation of non-current assets:
Property, plant and equipment
Buildings
Amortisation of non-current assets:
Mine properties and development costs
Total cost of sales
(b) Finance costs
Interest expense
Capitalised borrowing costs to qualifying asset
Unwinding of rehabilitation provision discount
Total finance costs
(c) Other expenses
Administration expenses
Employee benefits expense
Salaries and wages expense
Directors' fees and other benefits
Superannuation expense
Other employee benefits
Share-based payments expense
Other administration expenses
Consulting expenses
Travel and accommodation expenses
Other costs
Operating lease rentals
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
73
7,787,879
3,342,315
739,849
317,520
13,754,669
6,598,000
38,488,019
22,285,912
1,351,598
817,946
59,558,183
47,658,088
408,078,123
302,289,538
4,579,327
1,405,753
(4,579,327)
-
1,325,025
1,171,077
1,325,025
2,576,830
3,932,662
2,771,849
320,000
446,412
76,046
284,389
320,821
53,723
1,021,722
4,319,611
5,796,842
7,750,393
1,112,868
1,015,392
185,768
247,150
1,357,964
1,677,900
367,526
350,353
3,024,126
3,290,795
Depreciation expense
Depreciation of non-current assets:
Property plant and equipment
Total administration expenses
Other
Net loss on sale of assets
2019
2018
308,204
175,394
9,129,172
11,216,582
-
-
1,145,250
1,145,250
Total other expenses
9,129,172
12,361,832
8. INCOME TAX
(a) Major components of income tax expense:
Income Statement
Current income tax expense
Current income tax benefit
Adjustment in respect of current income tax of previous years
Deferred income tax
(2,984,035)
(15,966,295)
-
(5,369,468)
Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences in current year
(4,137,750)
21,646,708
Relating to temporary differences derecognised
Adjustment in respect of current income tax of previous years
3,857,859
3,475,934
-
5,573,635
Income tax for continuing and discontinuing operations
(3,263,926)
9,360,514
(b) Amounts charged or credited directly to equity
Share issue costs
(198,394)
(1,017,901)
(198,394)
(1,017,901)
(c) A reconciliation of income tax benefit and the product of accounting loss before income tax multiplied by the
Group's applicable income tax rate is as follows:
Accounting profit (loss) before tax from continuing operations
12,680,022
(40,915,053)
Accounting profit (loss) before tax from discontinuing operations
(1,813,885)
49,104,508
Total accounting profit before income tax
10,866,137
8,189,455
At statutory income tax rate of 30% (2018: 30%)
Non-deductible (non-assessable) items
Under/over in respect of prior years
3,259,841
2,456,837
(3,820,162)
3,306,360
(2,703,605)
3,597,317
Income tax (expense) benefit reported in the income statement
(3,263,926)
9,360,514
Tax expense from continuing operations
Tax (benefit) expense from discontinued operations
(807,116)
(9,009,017)
(2,456,810)
18,369,531
Income tax (benefit) expense reported in the income statement
(3,263,926)
9,360,514
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
74
8. INCOME TAX (CONTINUED)
(d) Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following
Statement of financial
position
Statement of comprehensive
income
2019
2018
2019
2018
Deferred tax liabilities
Exploration
(20,510,088)
(39,544,410)
(19,034,322)
9,367,298
Trade and other receivables
(658,745)
(530,810)
127,935
154,185
Net gain on financial assets AFVTP
Prepayments
Deferred mining
Inventories
(6,414,195)
(13,510)
-
-
6,414,195
13,510
-
-
(33,545,994)
(42,144,702)
(8,598,708)
17,464,667
(4,384,707)
(3,691,985)
692,722
3,732,207
Property plant and equipment
(1,857,819)
(5,798,935)
(3,941,116)
(86,618)
Gross deferred tax liabilities
(67,385,058)
(91,710,842)
Deferred tax assets
Available-for-sale financial assets
Accrued expenses
-
524,056
742,758
312,460
Provision for employee entitlements
2,780,744
2,042,220
Goodwill
699,185
-
742,758
(211,596)
(738,524)
(699,185)
(742,758)
(253,905)
(335,739)
-
Provision for rehabilitation
8,996,764
29,684,837
20,688,073
(2,456,477)
Business related costs
Capital raising costs
Recognised tax losses
Gross deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax liabilities
46,920
891,540
-
(46,920)
-
693,146
(198,394)
(640,446)
18,445,434
15,914,829
(2,530,605)
(15,914,829)
32,384,642
49,390,250
(35,000,416)
(42,320,592)
Deferred tax income (expense)
(7,320,177)
10,287,585
(e) Unrecognised losses
At 30 June 2019, there are no unrecognised losses for the Group (2018: nil).
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
75
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following reflects the income used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations.
2019
2018
(a) Earnings used in calculating earnings per share
Net profit (loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
13,487,139
(31,906,035)
Profit attributable to discontinued operations
642,925
30,734,976
Net profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
14,130,064
1,171,059
Basic earnings per share (cents)
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
3.57
0.17
3.74
(9.36)
9.01
(0.35)
Earnings used in calculating earnings per share
For diluted earnings per share:
Net loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent (from basic EPS)
13,487,139
(31,906,035)
Profit attributable to discontinued operations
642,925
30,734,976
Net (loss) profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
14,130,064
1,171,059
Diluted (loss) profit per share (cents)
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
3.57
0.17
3.74
(9.36)
9.01
(0.35)
(b) Weighted average number of shares
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per share
377,428,117
341,025,577
Effect of dilution:
Share options
Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for the effect of
dilution
-
-
377,428,117
341,025,577
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is calculated
by dividing the profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would
be issued on conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares.
The Company had 16,999,600 (2018: 76,800,884) share options on issue that are excluded from the calculation
of diluted earnings per share for the current financial period because they are considered anti-dilutive or are
contingently issuable.
There have been no other transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares between the
reporting date and the date of authorisation of these financial statements.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
76
10. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
2019
2018
Cash at bank and in hand
67,196,289
73,446,753
CASH FLOW RECONCILIATION
Reconciliation of net profit after income tax to net cash flows from operating activities
Profit (loss) after income tax
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
Amortisation and depreciation
Gold prepayment physical deliveries (refer to note 24)
Income tax (benefit) expense
Share based payments
Unwinding of rehabilitation provision discount
Accumulated mill scats written off (refer to note 12)
123,059,758
98,843,975
(13,458,438)
(23,887,876)
(3,263,926)
1,021,722
1,809,538
11,628,184
9,360,514
4,319,611
1,853,965
-
Net profit on sale of available-for-sale financial assets
-
(1,446,807)
Net (profit) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
(104,568)
1,145,250
Re-measurement of lithium rights (refer to note 15)
(15,000,000)
-
Fair value change in financial instruments (refer to note 15)
(9,384,589)
2,535,760
Option fee received in financial instruments
Mining rights received in financial instruments
Toll treatment fee received in financial instruments
Impairment of goodwill
-
(3,076,890)
(238,000)
-
-
-
(2,138,917)
2,553,772
6,381,974
Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off (refer to note 18)
6,165,134
Profit on disposal of subsidiaries (refer to note 36)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Increase in inventories
(16,435,747)
(61,759,658)
99,929,132
33,513,614
(11,546,974)
(16,701,522)
Decrease (increase) in trade and other receivables and prepayments
12,319,400
(7,057,850)
(Decrease) Increase in trade and other creditors
Increase in provisions
Net cash flows from operating activities
(21,343,789)
4,867,576
1,874,113
89,137
81,231,882
14,710,955
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
77
11. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (CURRENT)
Statutory receivables
Other debtors
Total trade and other receivables
2019
4,299,560
2,692,561
2018
6,977,117
12,928,713
6,992,121
19,905,830
Statutory receivables comprises of GST input tax credits and diesel fuel rebates.
Other debtors are non-interest bearing and generally have a 30-60 day term.
All trade and other receivables are classed as recoverable in full. The carrying amount of other debtors
approximate their fair value. Refer note 4(b) for credit risk disclosures.
12. INVENTORIES (CURRENT)
Ore stocks at net realisable value
Gold in circuit at cost
Stores and spares at cost
Provision for obsolete stores and spares
Total inventories at lower of cost and net realisable value
17,081,112
13,773,228
17,099,860
(2,451,286)
45,502,914
22,662,067
20,039,963
20,278,645
(2,287,618)
60,693,057
During the year there were no write-downs in ore or gold inventories value (2018: $1,397,502) from continuing
operations for the Group as the cost of inventory was well below the current gold price. Residual mill scats
accumulated at all operations totalling $11,628,184 (2018: nil) were written off as no effective route for their
processing was available for gold recovery due to risk of contained steel balls damaging crushing circuits.
13. PREPAYMENTS (CURRENT)
Prepayments
1,336,486
1,366,359
14. OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS (CURRENT)
Cash on deposit - bank guarantee facility
1,427,836
1,286,546
The cash on deposit is interest bearing and is used as security for bank guarantees
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
78
15. FINANCIAL ASSETS
Listed shares – Australian and Canadian
Royalties receivable - Lithium rights
Movement in available-for-sale financial assets
At 1 July
Additions of listed shares
Proceeds on disposal of financial assets
Net gain on available-for-sale financial assets (refer note 6)
Net gain on financial assets at FVTPL
Loss on sale of financial assets – discontinued operations (refer
note 36)
Impairment – continuing operations
Impairment – discontinued operations
At 30 June
Movement in Royalties Receivable
At 1 July
Re-measurement of receivable
At 30 June
Listed shares
2019
2018
41,210,813
15,000,000
56,210,813
6,267,158
-
6,267,158
6,267,158
31,357,163
(5,798,098)
-
9,474,899
(90,309)
-
-
41,210,813
-
15,000,000
15,000,000
373,151
68,523,333
(61,540,373)
1,446,807
-
(2,475,760)
(60,000)
6,267,158
-
-
-
These financial assets consist of investments in ordinary shares. The fair value of equity investments at fair
value through profit or loss has been determined directly by reference to published price quotations in an
active market.
(a) The Group has a 0.73% (2018: 0.74%) interest in Auris Minerals Limited (Auris), which is involved in the mining
and exploration of base metals in Australia. Auris is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. At the end
of the year, the fair value of the Company’s investment was $45,000 (2017: $204,000) which is based on the
quoted share price.
(b) During the year ended 30 June 2019, the Group sold its total investment holding in Rox Resources Limited.
(c) The Group has a 0.91% (2018: 1.17%) interest in Aruma Resources Limited (Aruma), which is involved in the
exploration of gold in Australia and listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. At the end of the year, the
fair value of the Group’s investment was $18,000 (2018: 78,000) which is based on the quoted share price.
(d) The Group has a 13.31% (2018: 14.68%) interest in Musgrave Minerals Limited (Musgrave), which is involved
in the exploration of gold and base metals in Australia. Musgrave is listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange. At the end of the year, the fair value of the Group’s investment was $2,729,500 (2018: 3,456,000)
which is based on the quoted share price.
(e) The Group has a 10.29% (2018: 6.46%) interest in RNC Minerals (RNC), which is a precious and base metal
mining company. RNC is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The Group acquired 56,916,019 additional
shares during the year as a result of the sale of the Higginsville Gold Operations. At 30 June 2019, the fair
value of the Group’s investment was $38,418,312 (2018: 2,364,158) which is based on the quoted share price.
(f) During the year ending 30 June 2019, the Group acquired shares in Liontown Resources (LTR) in respect of
mineral rights acquired of $238,000 and then subsequently sold its total investment.
In the prior year, these financial assets were classified as available-for-sale financial instruments and have
been reclassified as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss in accordance with AASB 9, refer to
note 2 (c).
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
79
Royalties Receivable
These financial assets consist of Lithium royalty rights. The fair value of royalties receivable at fair value
through profit or loss has been determined using a discounted cash flow model.
(a) The Buldania Lithium Royalty Rights
Agreement was reached to divest the Buldania Lithium Royalty to Liontown Resources Limited under a pre-
emptive arrangement for $2 million in cash with a $250,000 prepayment being received during June 2019
and final settlement occurring on 29 July 2019. The royalties represented a 1.5% gross revenue royalty and a
production royalty of $2 per tonne of ore mined and/or processed from three tenements (E63/686, P63/1977
and M63/647). There was no production from these titles with them being in an exploration and development
phase.
(b) The Mount Marion Lithium Royalty Rights
Westgold also reached agreement to divest its Mt Marion Royalty to Silverstream SZ for a gross $13 million in
cash. The royalties represented a 1.5% gross revenue royalty and a production royalty of $2 per tonne of ore
mined and/or processed from a 30 hectare area of Hampton’s Location 53 which it held for a 20year period
from 2016. There was no production from area during the year but production is planned for the ensuing
years. The agreement remained in a documentation phase at year end and is expected to be settled in the
first quarter of FY 2020.
16. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
Plant and equipment
Gross carrying amount at cost
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
Net carrying amount
Land and buildings
Gross carrying amount at cost
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
Net carrying amount
Capital work in progress at cost
Total property, plant and equipment
Movement in property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment
At 1 July net of accumulated depreciation
Transfer from capital work in progress
Disposals
Acquisition of subsidiary
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Depreciation charge for the year
At 30 June net of accumulated depreciation
2019
2018
287,780,355
298,386,377
(150,613,499)
(177,622,024)
137,166,856
120,764,353
19,158,851
29,895,813
(3,503,451)
(16,695,769)
15,655,400
13,200,044
22,750,247
47,445,443
175,572,503
181,409,840
120,764,353
70,509,158
(2,219,062)
-
(9,428,372)
48,625,886
48,347,224
(1,633,574)
54,127,834
(1,507,829)
(42,459,221)
(27,195,188)
137,166,856
120,764,353
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
80
16. PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED)
2019
2018
Land and buildings
At 1 July net of accumulated depreciation
13,200,044
13,016,401
Transfer from capital works in progress
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Depreciation charge for the year
3,840,684
102,764
(1,488,092)
1,281,683
(193,939)
(904,101)
At 30 June net of accumulated depreciation
15,655,400
13,200,044
Capital work in progress
At 1 July
Additions
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Acquisition of subsidiary
Transfer to mine properties (refer to note 17)
Transfer to mine capital development (refer to note 17)
Transfer to plant and equipment
Transfer to property
At 30 June
47,445,443
60,352,877
-
-
(7,740,341)
(2,957,890)
42,024,859
63,662,060
(3,450,866)
92,005
(1,590,250)
(3,663,458)
(70,509,158)
(48,347,224)
(3,840,684)
(1,281,683)
22,750,247
47,445,443
The carrying value of plant and equipment held under finance leases and hire purchase contracts at 30 June
2019 is $42,714,688 (2018: $30,197,581).
Leased assets and assets under hire purchase contracts are pledged as security for the related finance lease
and hire purchase lease liabilities (refer to notes 22 and 23).
17. MINE PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT
Movement in mine properties and development
Development areas at cost
At 1 July
Transfer to mine properties
At 30 June
Mine properties
756,919
8,434,080
-
(7,677,161)
756,919
756,919
At 1 July net of accumulated amortisation
19,678,627
14,891,415
Additions
Transfer from capital work in progress (refer to note 16)
Transfer from development areas
Transfer from mine capital development
Transfer from exploration (refer to note 18)
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Amortisation charge for the year
At 30 June net of accumulated amortisation
8,497,402
7,740,340
-
88,445,597
4,067,124
(732,928)
-
1,590,250
7,677,161
-
-
-
(9,856,024)
(4,480,199)
117,840,138
19,678,627
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
81
Mine capital development
At 1 July net of accumulated amortisation
Additions
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Transfer from capital work in progress (refer to note 16)
Movement in rehabilitation liability (refer to note 21)
Transfer from exploration (refer to note 18)
Transfer to capital development
Amortisation charge for the year
At 30 June net of accumulated amortisation
2019
2018
155,208,641
101,997,767
80,832,077
99,176,579
(11,894,014)
(20,929,586)
2,957,890
12,527,922
15,660,293
(88,445,597)
3,663,458
6,263,784
31,301,127
-
(69,256,418)
(66,264,488)
97,590,794
155,208,641
18. EXPLORATION EXPENDITURE
Exploration and evaluation costs carried forward in respect of mining
areas of interest
Pre-production areas
At cost less expenditure written off
Net carrying amount
Movement in deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure
At 1 July net of accumulated impairment
Additions
Acquisition of subsidiary
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 36)
Transferred to mine properties (refer to note 17)
104,276,449
147,262,738
104,276,449
147,262,738
147,262,738
162,604,807
16,411,424
25,469,201
-
9,080,000
(33,505,161)
(12,208,169)
(4,067,125)
-
Transferred to mine capital development (refer to note 17)
(15,660,293)
(31,301,127)
Expenditure written off – continuing operations:
(5,471,706)
(635,040)
Expenditure written off - discontinued operations (refer note 36)
(693,428)
(5,746,934)
At 30 June net of accumulated impairment
104,276,449
147,262,738
The ultimate recoupment of costs carried forward for exploration and evaluation phases is dependent on the
successful development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective mining areas.
During the year, a review was undertaken for each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of
continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. In assessing the carrying value of all of
the Group’s projects, certain expenditure on exploration and evaluation of mineral resources has not led to
the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources. As a result, exploration and evaluation
expenditure of $6,165,134 (2018: $6,381,974) was written off to the profit and loss. The amount relates to
tenements which were written down to nil as the expenditure did not result in the discovery of commercially
viable quantities of mineral resources and as a result no future benefits are expected.
19. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Trade creditors (a)
Sundry creditors and accruals (b)
27,915,244
29,826,722
38,335,418
46,872,690
57,741,966
85,208,108
(a) Trade creditors are non-interest bearing and generally on 30-day terms.
(b) Sundry creditors and accruals are non-interest bearing and generally on 30-day terms.
The carrying value of trade and other payables approximates the fair value thereof.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
82
20. PROVISIONS (CURRENT)
Provision for annual leave
Provision for long service leave
Provision for fringe benefits tax payable
21. PROVISIONS (NON-CURRENT)
Provision for long service leave
Provision for rehabilitation (a)
(a) Provision for rehabilitation
2019
2018
6,201,679
1,761,844
-
5,285,567
1,907,302
2,932
7,963,523
7,195,801
1,305,623
1,072,168
69,017,942
76,945,945
70,323,565
78,018,113
The Group makes full provision for the future cost of rehabilitating mine sites and related production facilities
on a discounted basis at the time of developing the mines and installing and using those facilities.
The rehabilitation provision represents the present value of rehabilitation costs relating to mine sites, which
are expected to be incurred up to 2029, which is when the producing mine properties are expected to cease
operations. These provisions have been created based on the Group’s internal estimates. Assumptions
based on the current economic environment have been made, which management believes are a reasonable
basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates are reviewed regularly to take into account
any material changes to the assumptions. However, actual rehabilitation costs will ultimately depend upon
future market prices for the necessary rehabilitation works required that will reflect market conditions at
the relevant time. Furthermore, the timing of rehabilitation is likely to depend on when the mines cease to
produce at economically viable rates. This, in turn, will depend upon future gold prices, which are inherently
uncertain.
The discount rates used in the calculation of the provision as at 30 June 2019 range from 1.09% to 1.40%
(2018: range from 2.12% to 2.64%). Refer to note 3) for further detail.
(c)
Current and non-current movements in
provisions
Onerous operating
lease
Rehabilitation
Total
At 1 July 2017
Utilised
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 38)
Adjustment due to revised conditions
Unwind of discount
At 30 June 2018
At 1 July 2018
Disposal of subsidiary (refer to note 38)
Adjustment due to revised conditions
Unwind of discount
At 30 June 2019
119,874
(119,874)
90,761,202
90,881,076
-
(119,874)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(22,003,513)
(22,003,513)
6,334,291
1,853,965
6,334,291
1,853,965
76,945,945
76,945,945
76,945,945
76,945,945
(22,265,463)
(22,265,463)
12,527,922
12,527,922
1,809,538
1,809,538
69,017,942
69,017,942
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
83
22. INTEREST BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS (CURRENT)
Lease liability
2019
2018
18,271,020
16,819,651
Represents current portion of finance leases which have repayment terms of 36 months
23. INTEREST BEARING LOANS AND BORROWINGS (NON-
CURRENT)
Lease liability
18,465,857
13,828,667
Represents non-current portion of finance leases which have repayment terms of 36 months from inception.
The carrying amount of the Group’s non-current loans and borrowings approximate their fair value. The
weighted average interest rate is 6.22% per annum (2018: 5.44%).
Assets pledged as security:
The carrying amounts of assets pledged as security for current and non-current interest bearing liabilities
are:
Non-current
Finance lease
Plant and equipment
Total non-current assets pledged as security
42,714,688
30,197,581
42,714,688
30,197,581
Plant and equipment assets are pledged against lease liabilities for the term of the lease period.
24. UNEARNED INCOME
Gold prepayment
Movement in unearned income
At 1 July
Revenue recognised during the year (refer note 5)
Fee for extension
Additional facility
Deemed finance component
At 30 June
25,470,487
18,075,375
25,470,487
18,075,375
18,075,375
5,812,500
(16,011,946)
(23,887,875)
145,614
-
20,853,550
36,150,750
2,407,894
-
25,470,487
18,075,375
The Group has a gold pre-pay facility with Citibank N.A (“Citi”), classified as unearned income on the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as Citi has prepaid the Group for a fixed quantity of gold ounces
based on a pre-determined gold forward price.
The Group has a legal obligation to deliver gold ounces, subsequently recognised as revenue upon the gold
repayment. Delivery of ounces is spread across the ensuing year.
As the original facility extended beyond 12 months, the Group has recognised an interest expense of
$2,407,894 as at 30 June 2019, based on the interest rate determined by the timing of those future gold
deliveries. Furthermore, as the Big Bell Underground Mine is considered a qualifying asset, all finance costs
were capitalised to Mine Properties and Development.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
84
25. ISSUED CAPITAL
(a) Ordinary Shares
Issued and fully paid
2019
2018
299,494,861
276,976,897
(b) Movements in ordinary shares on issue
Number
$
At 1 July 2017
Acquisition of subsidiary
Issued share capital (refer note 28 (b))
Issued share capital on conversion of options (f)
Issued share capital
Share issue costs, net of tax
At 30 June 2018
Issued share capital
Issued share capital on conversion of listed options
Share issue costs, net of tax
At 30 June 2019
305,921,487
173,944,902
18,000,000
31,420,000
889,533
2,298,549
36,000,000
-
1,529,997
4,597,098
67,860,000
(2,375,100)
363,109,569
276,976,897
26,000,000
23,400,000
44,785
-
89,570
(971,606)
389,154,354
299,494,861
(c) Terms and conditions of contributed equity
Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled to
one vote per share at shareholder meetings. In the event of winding up the Company the holders are entitled
to participate in the proceeds from the sale of all surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts
paid up on shares held. Effective 1 July 1998, the Corporations legislation in place abolished the concepts
of authorised capital and par share values. Accordingly, the Parent does not have authorised capital nor par
value in respect of its issued shares.
(d) Escrow Restrictions
There are no current escrow restrictions on the issued capital of the Company.
(e) Options on issue
Unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option at the date of this report are as follows:
Type
Expiry Date
Exercise Price
Number of options
Unlisted (i)
Unlisted (i)
Unlisted (ii)
Unlisted (ii)
Unlisted (ii)
Unlisted (ii)
Total
11 January 2020
24 November 2020
30 June 2020
30 June 2021
30 June 2022
30 June 2023
$2.02
$2.31
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
9,700,000
5,300,000
230,307
230,307
769,490
769,490
16,999,594
(i)
(ii)
PEPOs issued pursuant to the Westgold Resources Limited Employee Share and Option Plan.
ZEPOs issued pursuant to the Westgold Resources Limited Employee Share and Option Plan.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
85
(f) Option conversions
44,785 listed options were exercised during the financial year (2018: 2,298,549).
(g) Capital management – gearing ratio
Gearing ratio
Net debt
Capital
2019
2018
8.27%
7.55%
36,736,877
30,648,318
443,968,663
405,816,161
Capital includes issued capital and all other equity reserves attributable to the equity holders of the parent for
the purpose of the Group’s capital management. The primary objective of the Group’s capital management
is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios in order to support its business
and maximise the shareholder’s value.
The Group manages its capital structure and makes adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions
and the requirements of the financial covenants. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may
return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or
processes during the years ended 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
The Group monitors capital using a gearing ratio, which is net debt divided by the aggregate of equity and net
debt. The Group’s policy is to keep the gearing ratio between 5% and 20%. The Group includes in its net debt,
interest-bearing loans and borrowings, trade and other payables, less cash and short-term deposits.
26. ACCUMULATED LOSSES
At 1 July
Net profit (loss) in current year attributable to members of the parent
entity
(65,915,053)
(64,743,994)
14,130,064
(1,171,059)
(51,784,989)
(65,915,053)
At 30 June
27. RESERVES
At 30 June 2017
Share-based payments
At 30 June 2018
Share-based payments
At 30 June 2019
Nature and purpose of reserves
Equity reserve
Share based
payments
reserve
8,941,075
4,319,611
Equity reserve
Total
181,493,631
190,434,706
-
4,319,611
13,260,686
181,493,631
194,754,317
1,021,722
-
1,021,722
14,282,408
181,493,631
195,776,039
This reserve relates to the intercompany loans with Metals X Ltd written off on demerger of the Consolidated
Entity and includes tax consolidated adjustments.
Share based payments reserve
This reserve is used to recognise the fair value of rights and options issued to employees in relation to equity-
settled share based payments.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
86
28. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
(a) Recognised share-based payment expense
The expense recognised for services received during the year is shown in the table below:
Expense arising from equity-settled share-based payments
1,021,722
4,319,611
2019
2018
The share-based payment plan is described below. There have been no cancellations or modifications to the
plan during 2019 and 2018.
(b) Transactions settled using shares
No transactions were settled in the current year however in the previous financial year the following
transactions were settled using shares:
• On 3 July 2017, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of Australian Contract
Mining Pty Ltd (“ACM”). Consideration for the acquisition was the issue of 14,000,000 fully paid ordinary
shares. The shares were measured at a fair value of $1.81 per share based on the agreed number of
shares negotiated as consideration for the sale.
• On 14 August 2017, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of accommodation
facilities purchased from Mining and Civil Management Services Pty Ltd. Consideration for the acquisition
(inclusive of GST) was the issue of 889,533 fully paid ordinary shares. The acquisition was accounted for
by measuring the fair value of the assets acquired which were recognised as additions to property, plant
and equipment.
• On 13 February 2018, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of Polar Metals
Pty Ltd. Consideration for the acquisition included the issue of 4,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares. The
Company determined that it could not readily estimate the fair value of the assets acquired on the basis
that this was an exploration asset. The purchase was measured by reference to the share issued which
were measured at market value on 13 February 2018 (acquisition date) at $1.52 per share.
(c) Employee Share and Option Plan
Under the Employee Share and Option Plan (ESOP), grants are made to senior executives and other staff
members who have made an impact on the Group’s performance. ESOP grants are delivered in the form of
share options or performance rights which vest over periods as determined by the Board of Directors.
(d) Performance Rights
Performance rights are issued for nil consideration. Performance rights are subject to vesting conditions as
determined by the Board of Directors. Any performance rights that do not vest by their expiry date will lapse.
Upon vesting, these performance rights will be settled in ordinary fully paid shares of the Company.
No performance rights have been issued under the ESOP.
(e) Share options
PEPOs
Share options are issued for nil consideration. The exercise price, vesting conditions and expiry date are
determined by the Board of Directors. The expiry date is not less than two years from issue date. Any options
that are not exercised by the expiry date will lapse. Upon exercise, these options will be settled in ordinary
fully paid shares of the Company.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
87
ZEPOs
Unlisted employee options are issued to senior management under the Employee Share Option Plan, the
principle terms being:
•
•
•
The Employee Options have been issued for nil consideration;
Each Employee Option carries an entitlement to one fully paid ordinary share in the Company for each
Employee Option vested;
Vesting only occurs after the end of the Performance Periods (30 June 2020 and 30 June 2021) and the
number of Employee Options that vest (if any) will depend on:
- Growth in Return on Capital Employed over the Performance Periods; and
- Total shareholder return relative to the S&P/All Ordinaries Gold Index over the Performance Periods.
• Options issued to directors that vest will expire if not exercised on the vesting date;
• Options issued to employees that vest will expire two years after the vesting date;
• Unvested Employee Options lapse on cessation of a holder’s employment with Westgold;
• Any Employee Options that do not vest after the end of the Performance Periods will automatically lapse;
and
• No amount is payable by a holder of Employee Options in respect of the shares allocated upon vesting of
the Employee Option.
Summary of options granted under the Employee Share and Option Plan
2019 Number
2019 WAEP
2018 Number
2018 WAEP
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
Granted during the year
Exercised during the year
Lapsed/cancelled during the year
Outstanding at the year end
Exercisable at the year end
15,000,000
1,999,600
-
-
16,999,600
15,000,000
2.12
0.00
-
-
1.87
2.12
11,000,000
5,475,000
-
(1,475,000)
15,000,000
9,700,000
2.02
2.31
-
2.05
2.12
2.02
The outstanding balance as at 30 June 2019 is represented by the following table:
Grant Date
Vesting
date
Expiry
date
Exercise
Price
Options
granted
Options
lapsed /
cancelled
Options
exercised
ZEPOs
28/11/2018
30/06/2020
30/06/2020
28/11/2018
30/06/2021
30/06/2021
10/05/2019
30/06/2020
30/06/2022
10/05/2019
30/06/2021
30/06/2023
PEPOs
22/11/2017
22/11/2018
24/11/2020
23/11/2017
24/11/2018
24/11/2020
24/11/2016
11/1/2018
11/1/2020
11/1/2017
11/1/2018
11/1/2020
Total
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.31
$2.31
$2.02
$2.02
230,307
230,307
769,490
769,490
2,400,000
-
-
-
-
-
3,075,000
(175,000)
2,250,000
-
8,750,000
(1,300,000)
18,474,594
(1,475,000)
Number of options at end
of period
On issue
Vested
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
230,307
230,307
769,493
769,493
-
-
-
-
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,900,000
2,900,000
2,250,000
2,250,000
7,450,000
7,450,000
16,999,600
15,000,000
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
88
28. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
Weighted average remaining contractual life of share options
The weighted average remaining contractual life for the share options outstanding as at 30 June 2019 is 1.06
years (2018: 2.12 years).
Range of exercise price of share options
The range of exercise price for options outstanding at the end of the year is $0.00 to $2.31 (2018: $2.02 to
$2.31).
Weighted average fair value of share options
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was $0.57 (2018: $0.45).
Share option valuation
The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted under the ESOP is estimated at the date of grant
using either a Black & Scholes or a Monte Carlo model , which takes into account factors including the
option’s exercise price, the volatility of the underlying share price, the risk-free interest rate, the market price
of the underlying share at grant date, historical and expected dividends and the expected life of the option,
and the probability of fulfilling the required hurdles.
Tranche 1 options vest subject to performance hurdles, measured for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2020.
The two measures are:
• Growth in Return on Capital Employed over the Performance Periods; and
•
Total shareholder return relative to the S&P/All Ordinaries Gold Index over the Performance Periods.
The following table gives the assumptions made in determining the fair value of the options granted in
Tranche 1:
Grant date
Expected volatility (%)
Risk-free interest rate (%)
Expected life of options (yrs)
Options exercise price ($)
Share price at grant date ($)
Fair value at grant date ($)
28/11/2018
50%
1.81%
1.58
$0.00
$0.985
$0.228
28/11/2018
50%
1.81%
1.58
$0.00
$0.985
$0.985
10/05/2019
50%
1.275%
3.14
$0.00
$1.345
$0.224
10/05/2019
50%
1.275%
3.14
$0.00
$1.345
$1.345
Tranche 2 options vest subject to performance hurdles, measured for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021.
The two measures are:
• Growth in Return on Capital Employed over the Performance Periods; and
•
Total shareholder return relative to the S&P/All Ordinaries Gold Index over the Performance Periods.
The following table gives the assumptions made in determining the fair value of the options granted in
Tranche 2:
Grant date
Expected volatility (%)
Risk-free interest rate (%)
Expected life of options (yrs)
Options exercise price ($)
Share price at grant date ($)
Fair value at grant date ($)
28/11/2018
50%
2.06%
2.58
$0.00
$0.985
$0.328
28/11/2018
50%
2.06%
2.58
$0.00
$0.985
$0.985
10/05/2019
50%
1.285%
4.14
$0.00
$1.345
$0.306
10/05/2019
50%
1.285%
4.14
$0.00
$1.345
$1.345
The effects of early exercise have been incorporated into the calculations by using an expected life for the
option that is shorter than the contractual life based on historical exercise behaviour, which is not necessarily
indicative of exercise patterns that may occur in the future. The expected volatility was determined using a
historical sample of the Company’s share price over a two-month period. The resulting expected volatility
therefore reflects the assumptions that the historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also
not necessarily be the actual outcome.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
89
29. COMMITMENTS
(a) Capital commitments
At 30 June 2019, the Group has capital commitments that relate principally to the purchase and maintenance
of plant and equipment for its mining operations.
Capital expenditure commitments
- Within one year
2019
2018
8,996,852
20,902,157
(b) Operating lease commitments and expenditure commitments on tenements
The Company has entered into a commercial property lease on office rental. The Company has also entered
into commercial leases on power generation facilities and office equipment. These operating leases have an
average life of between one month and five years with renewal options included in the contracts.
The Company also has commercial leases over the tenements in which the mining operations are located.
These tenement leases have a life of between six months and twenty-one years. In order to maintain current
rights to explore and mine the tenements, the Group is required to perform minimum exploration work to
meet the expenditure requirements specified by the relevant state governing body. There are no restrictions
placed on the lessee by entering into these contracts.
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases as at 30 June are as follows:
(i) Operating leases – company as lessee
- Within one year
- After one year but not more than five years
(ii) Mineral tenement leases:
- Within one year
- After one year but not more than five years
- After more than five years
5,433,524
4,457,726
7,740,774
3,706,074
13,174,298
8,163,800
3,898,504
3,962,751
15,319,776
15,299,356
30,556,302
34,156,047
49,774,582
53,418,154
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
90
29. COMMITMENTS (CONTINUED)
(c) Finance lease and hire purchase commitments
The Company has finance leases and hire purchase contracts for various items of plant and machinery. The
leases do have terms of renewal but no escalation clauses. Renewals are at the option of the specific entity
that holds the lease. The finance and hire purchase contracts have an average term of 36 months with the
right to purchase the asset at the completion of the lease term.
Future minimum lease payments under finance leases and hire purchase contracts together with the present
value of the minimum lease payments are as follows:
Within one year
After one year but not more than five years
Total minimum lease payments
Less amounts representing finance charges
Present value of minimum lease payments
Within one year
After one year but not more than five years
Total minimum lease payments
Less amounts representing finance charges
Present value of minimum lease payments
2019
Minimum
lease
payments
Present
value
of lease
payments
19,741,650
18,271,020
19,205,342
18,465,857
38,946,992
36,736,877
(2,210,115)
-
36,736,877
36,736,877
2018
Minimum
lease
payments
Present
value
of lease
payments
19,578,912
16,819,651
17,027,473
13,828,667
36,606,385
30,648,318
(5,958,067)
-
30,648,318
30,648,318
The weighted average interest rate of leases for the Company is 6.22% (2018: 5.44%).
(d) Other commitments
The Group has obligations for various expenditures such as royalties, production-based payments and
exploration expenditure. Such expenditures are predominantly related to the earning of revenue in the
ordinary course of business.
Royalties paid under contractual arrangements
2019
2018
14,982,184
11,270,111
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
91
30. CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(i) Bank guarantees
The Group has a number of bank guarantees in favour of various government authorities and service providers.
The bank guarantees primarily relate to office leases and environmental and rehabilitation bonds at the
various projects. The total amount of these guarantees at the reporting date is $1,427,836 (2018: $1,286,546).
These bank guarantees are fully secured by term deposits (refer to note 14).
(ii) Clawback agreement
AngloGold Ashanti holds the right to earn back a 75% interest in any individual resource defined within the
tenements acquired from AngloGold by Westgold (with the exception of Rover 1 and Explorer 108), under
specific terms, conditions, specified payments and performance hurdles none of which have been met. The
associated asset is included under Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure to the value of $8,684,857.
31. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst & Young (Australia) for:
2019
2018
An audit or review of financial reports of the entity and any other entity within
the Group
312,467
334,895
Other services in relation to the entity and any other entity in the Consolidated
Entity:
- tax compliance
Total auditor remuneration
116,000
428,467
239,227
574,122
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
92
32. OPERATING SEGMENTS
For management purposes, the Group is organised into operating segments determined by the location of
the mineral being mined or explored, as these are the sources of the Group’s major risks and have the most
effect on rates of return.
Reportable segments
The Group comprises the following reportable segments:
Meekatharra Gold Operations (MGO): Mining, treatment, exploration and development of gold assets
Cue Gold Operations (CGO):
Mining, treatment, exploration and development of gold assets
Fortnum Gold Operations (FGO)
Mining, treatment, exploration and development of gold assets
Other
Exploration and development of other mineral assets and contract
mining services
Executive management monitors the operating results of its operating segments separately for the purpose
of making decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment. Segment performance is
evaluated based on operating profit or loss and is measured consistently with operating profit or loss in the
consolidated financial statements. However, certain income and expenses (see below) are managed on a
consolidated basis and are not allocated to operating segments. All other adjustments and eliminations are
part of the detailed reconciliations presented further below.
Changes from prior year
The internal activities of the Contract Mining Services Division has been reported within the applicable Gold
Operations in order to reflect the net cost for each of those operations which is consistent with internal
management reporting. The key external mining contract has also been completed. The external Mining
Services Division, which was previously reported as a separate segment has now been combined with the
Northern Territory Exploration Projects and Lithium Rights under “Other”. Discontinued operations have
been excluded in the segment reporting but details are disclosed in note 36. Comparative figures have been
restated accordingly.
Unallocated income and costs
Finance income and fair value gains and losses on financial assets are not allocated to individual segments
as the underlying instruments are managed on a Group basis.
Current taxes, deferred taxes and certain financial assets and liabilities are not allocated to those segments
as they are also managed on a Group basis. Corporate charges comprise non-segmental expenses such as
head office expenses and interest costs. Corporate charges are not allocated to operating segments. Refer to
reconciliation segment results to consolidated results.
Other disclosures
Capital expenditure consists of additions of property, plant and equipment, mine properties and development
and exploration and evaluation expenditure including assets from the acquisition of subsidiaries.
The following table presents revenue and profit information for reportable segments for the years ended 30
June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
93
Year ended 30 June 2019
Exernal revenue
Sale of gold at spot
Sale of gold under forward
contracts
Sale of gold under a prepay facility
Financing component on gold
sales under prepay facility
Mining and contracting services
Total segment revenue
Results
Depreciation and amortisation
Exploration and evaluation
expenditure written off
Accumulated mill scats written off
MGO
CGO
FGO
Other
Total
55,105,103
53,798,893
51,823,872
98,997,256
64,741,709
52,165,824
12,108,484
2,037,462
1,749,375
116,625
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,672,844
-
167,960,218 120,694,689 103,989,696 25,672,844
-
-
160,727,868
215,904,789
14,145,946
1,866,000
25,672,844
418,317,447
(51,704,059)
(24,869,912)
(20,720,491)
(2,411,541)
(99,706,003)
(2,393,064)
(497,944)
(150,864)
(2,429,834)
(5,471,706)
(11,491,150)
(9,233)
(127,801)
-
(11,628,184)
Segment (loss) profit
(20,392,555)
(1,047,700)
15,722,413 (2,467,750)
(8,185,592)
Total assets
178,125,218 243,187,048 112,187,209 31,216,018
564,715,493
Total liabilities
(58,344,581)
(80,098,686)
(28,359,223)
(874,484)
(157,065,262)
Other disclosures
Capital expenditure
Year ended 30 June 2018
External revenue
Sale of gold at spot
(52,958,699)
(81,401,015)
(21,699,381)
(1,006,168)
(157,065,262)
MGO
CGO
FGO
Other
Total
44,736,050
6,686,870
36,227,511
Sale of gold on contract
114,719,063
7,700,960
33,581,230
Sale of gold on contract -
prepayment
21,879,500
Mining and contracting services
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
87,650,431
156,001,253
21,879,500
11,298,099
11,298,099
Total segment revenue
181,334,613
14,387,830
69,808,741 11,298,099
276,829,283
Results
Depreciation and amortisation
(51,118,912)
(3,225,004)
(15,588,965)
(1,004,459)
(70,937,340)
Exploration and evaluation
expenditure written off
(47,204)
(72,960)
(514,876)
-
(635,040)
Segment profit (loss)
(21,670,374)
(5,084,013)
447,893 (2,365,631)
(28,672,125)
Total assets
180,294,757 170,281,486 105,101,958 44,822,333
500,500,534
Total liabilities
(67,120,370)
(40,992,760)
(32,810,386)
(14,360,223)
(155,283,739)
Other disclosures
Capital expenditure
(58,757,047)
(50,568,806)
(34,749,449)
(6,526,789)
(150,602,091)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
94
32. OPERATING SEGMENTS (CONTINUED)
(a) Reconciliation of profit (loss)
Segment loss
Corporate administration expenses
Corporate interest income
Corporate other income
Impairment loss on available-for-sale financial assets
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale financial assets
Net gain on fair value changes of financial assets
Net gain on sale of financial assets at FVTPL
Net gain (loss) on disposal of assets
Impairment of goodwill
Total consolidated profit (loss) from continuing operations before income
tax
(b) Reconciliation of assets
Segment operating assets
Unallocated corporate assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Prepayments
Other financial assets
Financial assets (equity investments)
Property, plant and equipment
Assets - discontinued operations
Total consolidated assets
(c) Reconciliation of liabilities
Segment operating liabilities
Unallocated corporate liabilities
Trade and other payables
Other provisions
Provision for employee benefits
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
Deferred tax liability
Liabilities - discontinued operations
Total consolidated liabilities
(d) Segment revenue from external customers
Segment revenue
Total revenue
2019
2018
(8,185,592)
(9,129,172)
308,101
5,072,352
-
-
21,353,650
3,121,249
139,435
-
(28,672,125)
(11,216,582)
571,184
3,130,446
(2,475,760)
1,446,807
-
-
(1,145,250)
(2,553,772)
12,680,023
(40,915,052)
564,715,493
500,500,534
65,483,767
944,183
378,462
1,180,677
43,210,813
809,350
-
676,722,745
70,706,859
245,683
499,573
940,677
6,102,158
690,069
87,596,915
667,282,468
167,676,974
155,283,739
28,367,977
-
2,133,433
58,034
35,000,416
-
233,236,834
19,540,611
2,283
1,858,796
46,367
42,320,592
42,413,919
261,466,307
418,317,447
418,317,447
276,829,283
276,829,283
Revenue from external customers by geographical locations is detailed below. Revenue is attributable to
geographical location based on the location of the customers. The Company does not have external revenues
from external customers that are attributable to any foreign country other than as shown.
Australia
Total revenue
418,317,447
418,317,447
276,829,283
276,829,283
The Group has three customers to which it sells gold and each account for 36%, 61% and 3% of this external
revenue respectively (2018: Two customers 33% and 67%).
(e) Segment non-current assets are all located in Australia.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
95
33. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
(a) Details of Key Management Personnel
(i) Non-Executive Directors
PJ Newton
PB Schwann
SV Shet
FJ Van Maanen
Non-Executive Chairman
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Appointed
6 October 2016
2 February 2017
18 December 2017
6 October 2016
(ii) Executive Directors
PG Cook
JS Norregaard
Managing Director
Executive Director
19 March 2007
29 December 2016
(iii) Other Executives (KMPs)
PM Storey
PW Wilding
General Manager MGO
General Manager CGO
RB Armstrong
General Manager FGO
23 May 2018
1 July 2018
1 July 218
DJ Noort
DW Okeby
DA Fullarton
SM Balloch
General Manager ACM
20 August 2019
Company Secretary & Legal
Manager
CFO
CFO
1 December 2016
21 May 2018
Resigned
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 December 2016
8 July 2018
There are no changes of the key management personnel after the reporting date and before the date the
financial report was authorised for issue.
(b) Compensation of Key Management Personnel
Short term benefits
Post-employment benefits
Other long-term benefits
Share-based payment
2019
2018
3,726,230
221,120
59,359
592,639
4,599,348
2,864,733
178,336
48,842
2,805,753
5,897,664
(c) Loans to Key Management Personnel
There were no loans to key management personnel during the current or previous financial year.
(d)
Interest held by Key Management Personnel under the Long Term Incentive Plan
Grant date
28/11//2018
28/11/2018
10/05//2019
10/05//2019
22/11/2017
23/11/2017
24/11/2016
11/1/2017
Total
Expiry date
30/06/2020
30/06/2021
30/06/2022
30/06/2023
24/11/2020
24/11/2020
11/1/2020
11/1/2020
Exercise price $
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.31
2.31
2.02
2.02
2018
2017
230,307
230,307
769,490
769,490
-
-
-
-
1,999,594
-
-
-
-
2,400,000
1,200,000
2,250,000
3,900,000
9,750,000
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
96
34. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES
(a) Subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements of the Group include Westgold Resources Limited and the subsidiaries
listed in the following table:
Ownership Interest
Name
Country of
incorporation
Castile Resources Pty Ltd
Aragon Resources Pty Ltd
Big Bell Gold Operations Pty Ltd
Australian Contact Mining Pty Ltd
Location 53 Pty Ltd
Hill 51 Pty Ltd *
Avoca Resources Pty Ltd *
Avoca Mining Pty Ltd *
Polar Metals Pty Ltd *
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
2018
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2017
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
* Entities disposed on sale (refer to note 36)
(b) Ultimate Parent
Westgold Resources Limited is the ultimate parent entity.
(c) Key Management Personnel
Details relating to key management personnel, including remuneration paid, are included in note 33.
(d) Transactions with related parties
There was no related party transaction for the year ending 30 June 2019.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
97
25. INFORMATION RELATING TO WESTGOLD RESOURCES
LIMITED (“THE PARENT ENTITY”)
Current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Issued capital
Retained earnings
Share-based payments reserve
Other reserves
Total Equity
2019
2018
67,933,961
413,646,651
30,469,940
30,506,316
72,226,989
356,538,551
21,250,528
21,282,253
299,494,862
64,806,283
14,282,408
4,556,783
383,140,336
275,958,998
41,479,832
13,260,686
4,556,783
335,256,299
Profit of the parent entity
Total comprehensive profit of the parent entity
34,116,826
34,116,826
25,660,747
25,660,747
Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries.
Pursuant to ASIC Corporations (Wholly owned Companies) Instrument 2016/785, Westgold and its wholly
owned subsidiaries (except Location 53 Pty Ltd) entered into a deed of cross guarantee on 28 November
2016 (the Guarantee). The effect of the Guarantee is that Westgold has guaranteed to pay any deficiency in
the event of winding up of any controlled entity which is a party to the Guarantee or if they do not meet their
obligations under the terms of any debt subject to the Guarantee. The controlled entities which are parties to
the Guarantee have given a similar guarantee in the event that Westgold is wound up or if it does not meet its
obligations under the terms of any debt subject to the Guarantee.
The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the closed group is not different to the Group’s Statement of Financial Position and Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
Contingent liabilities of the parent entity.
Contractual commitments by the parent entity for the acquisition of
property, plant or equipment.
Nil
Nil
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
98
36. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Higginsville Gold Operations
In a strategy to focus efforts on the larger long-life Murchison gold assets, agreement was reached to sell the
Higginsville Gold Operations (HGO) to RNC Minerals (RNC) on 10 June 2019.
HGO operates the Higginsville Processing Plant as its mining hub. In recent years the Mount Henry Open Pit
had operated as the core feed with the remainder of plant capacity filled by toll processing third party ores
from the region.
In FY2019 Westgold sold its wholly owned subsidiaries that collectively make up HGO; namely Hill 51 Pty Ltd,
Avoca Resources Pty Ltd, Avoca Mining Pty Ltd and Polar Metals Pty Ltd. The consideration for the sale was
$55 million (with working capital adjustments). The purchase consideration comprised of $24 million in cash;
$27 million in 49,811,364 fully paid ordinary shares in RNC Minerals Limited and an option fee of $4 million
in 7,104,655 fully paid ordinary shares in RNC Minerals Limited
Results of the discontinued operations:
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross loss
Other income
Loss on sale of financial assets
Other expenses
Finance costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off
Gain on disposal of controlled entities
Loss before tax
Income tax benefit
Profit (loss) for the year from discontinued operations
Cash flow information from discontinued operations:
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Carrying value of net assets at date of disposal:
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Prepayments
Property, plant and equipment
Mine properties and development costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Deferred tax liabilities
Net assets disposed of
2019
2018
76,963,348
(95,008,018)
(18,044,670)
1,110,359
(90,309)
(34,867)
(496,717)
(693,428)
16,435,747
(1,813,885)
2,456,810
642,925
94,802,011
(102,727,156)
(7,925,145)
377,388
-
(60,000)
(335,175)
(5,602,267)
-
(13,545,199)
4,063,559
(9,481,640)
2019
9,796,749
(9,082,668)
(247,904)
466,177
614,991
461,278
15,108,933
50,226
10,137,250
10,607,459
33,505,161
70,485,298
(6,170,363)
(23,025,720)
(3,857,859)
(33,053,942)
37,431,356
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
99
Gain on sale of subsidiary
Consideration received in cash and cash equivalents
Consideration received in shares
Fees and working capital adjustments
Less net assets disposed of
Gain on disposal
2019
24,079,927
30,937,176
(1,150,000)
(37,431,356)
16,435,747
South Kalgoorlie Operations
In FY2018 Westgold sold its wholly owned subsidiaries that collectively make up the South Kalgoorlie
Operations; Dioro Exploration Pty Ltd, HBJ Minerals Pty Ltd and Hampton Gold Mining Areas Ltd to Northern
Star Resources Limited. The consideration for the sale was $80 million (with working capital adjustments).
Westgold retained its lithium royalties over the Mt Marion Lithium Mine and the rights to lithium exploration
and mining over Location 53 and 59.
2019
2018
Results of the discontinued operations:
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Finance costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure written off
Gain on disposal of controlled entities
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year from discontinued operations
Cash flow information from discontinued operations:
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Carrying value of net assets at date of disposal:
Assets
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Prepayments
Property, plant and equipment
Mine properties and development costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Deferred tax asset
Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Deferred tax liabilities
Net assets disposed of
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
67,260,297
(66,256,596)
1,003,701
390,548
(359,534)
(144,667)
61,759,658
62,649,706
(22,433,090)
40,216,616
2018
13,297,796
(12,509,364)
(902,589)
(114,157)
141,483
11,970,075
195,329
5,152,635
20,929,587
12,208,169
982,231
51,579,509
(7,454,795)
(23,155,680)
(4,458,165)
(35,068,640)
16,510,869
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019 100
36. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Gain on sale of subsidiary
Consideration received in cash and cash equivalents
Deferred sale proceeds on sale of subsidiary
Consideration received in shares
Working capital adjustments
Less net assets disposed of
Gain on disposal
2018
19,000,000
1,000,000
59,809,527
(1,539,000)
(16,510,869)
61,759,658
Entities disposed were Dioro Exploration Pty Ltd, HBJ Minerals Pty Ltd and Hampton Gold Mining Areas
Limited.
37. EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
There are no significant events after the balance sheet date.
38. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New and amended standards and interpretations
The Group applied AASB 9 Financial Instruments (“AASB 9”) and AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (“AASB 15”) for the first time from 1 July 2018. The nature and effect of the adoption of these new
standards are described below. Several other new and amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations
applied for the first time from 1 July 2018 but did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements
of the Group and, hence, have not been disclosed.
AASB 9
AASB 9 which contains accounting requirements for financial instruments, replaces parts of AASB 139
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (“AASB 139”) for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2018. AASB 9 contains requirements in the areas of classification and measurement, impairment,
hedge accounting and de-recognition of financial instruments.
The Group has applied AASB 9 retrospectively, with the initial application date being 1 July 2018 and has elected
not to restate comparative information which continued to be reported under AASB 139. The adoption of AASB
9 did not result in any adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as at 1 July 2018.
Classification and measurement
AASB 9 introduced new classification and measurement models for financial assets. A financial asset shall
be measured at amortised cost, if it is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in
order to collect contractual cash flows, which arise on specified dates and are solely payments of principal
and interest (“SPPI”). All other financial instrument assets are classified and measured at fair value through
profit or loss (“FVTPL”) unless the entity makes an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains
and losses on equity instruments (that are not held-for trading) in other comprehensive income (“OCI”).
For financial liabilities, the standard requires the portion of the change in fair value that relates to the entity’s
own credit risk to be presented in OCI (unless it would create an accounting mismatch).
Existing financial assets and liabilities of the Group were assessed in terms of the requirements of AASB 9. In
this regard the adoption of AASB 9 will impact on the classification of financial assets and liabilities:
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
101
Financial instrument
Original measurement category under AASB
139 (i.e. prior to 1 July 2018)
1 July 2018
Cash and cash equivalents
Loans and receivables
Trade receivables, deposit and
other receivables
Loans and receivables
Equity investments
Available-for-sale financial assets
Trade and other payables
Financial liability at amortised cost
Financial liability at amortised cost
Interest bearing loans and
borrowings
Financial instrument
73,446,753
19,905,830
6,267,158
85,208,108
30,648,318
New measurement category under AASB 9 (i.e.
from 1 July 2018)
1 July 2018
Cash and cash equivalents
Financial assets at amortised cost
Trade receivables, deposit and
other receivables
Equity investments
Financial assets at amortised cost
Financial assets at fair value through profit and
loss (FVTPL)
Trade and other payables
Financial liability at amortised cost
Interest bearing loans and
borrowings
Financial liability at amortised cost
73,446,753
19,905,830
6,267,158
85,208,108
30,648,318
The changes in classification did not resulted in any re-measurement adjustments at 1 July 2018. As available
for sale equity instruments had previously been impaired, there was no equity reserve to reclassify to
accumulated losses on adoption of AASB 9.
Impairment
In relation to the financial assets carried at amortised cost, AASB 9 requires an expected credit loss model
to be applied as opposed to an incurred credit loss model under AASB 139. The expected credit loss model
requires the Group to account for expected credit losses and changes in those expected credit losses at each
reporting date to reflect changes in credit risk since initial recognition of the financial asset. In particular,
AASB 9 requires the Group to measure the loss allowance at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit loss
(“ECL”) if the credit risk on the instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition. On the other
hand, if the credit risk on the financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition, the
Group is required to measure the loss allowance for that financial instrument at an amount equal to the ECL
within the next 12 months.
At 1 July 2018, upon adoption of AASB 9, the Group reviewed and assessed the existing financial assets for
impairment using reasonable and supportable information.
Given the nature of the Group’s business and the nature of its financial assets subject to impairment
assessment, there was no material impact arising from the application of the new impairment requirements
of AASB 9. As all of the Group’s trade receivables, deposits and other current receivables which the Group
measured at amortised cost are short term (i.e., less than 12 months), and the Group has credit rating and
risk management policies in place, the change to a forward-looking expected credit loss approach did not
have a material impact on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.
The accounting policy of the Group on financial instruments is disclosed in more detail in note 2(g).
AASB 15
AASB 15 supersedes AASB 118 Revenue (“AASB 118”) and related Interpretations and it applies to all revenue
arising from contracts with customers, unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. AASB 15
establishes a five-step model to account for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Under AASB 15,
revenue is recognised at an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled
in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. Under AASB 15, the revenue recognition model
will change from one based on the transfer of risk and reward of ownership to the transfer of control of
ownership.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019 102
38. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CONTINUED)
AASB 15 requires entities to exercise judgement, taking into consideration all of the relevant facts and
circumstances when applying each step of the model to contracts with their customers. The standard also
specifies the accounting for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract and the costs directly related to
fulfilling a contract. In addition, the standard requires enhanced and extensive disclosures about revenue to
help investors better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from
contracts with customers.
The Group has adopted AASB 15 using the modified retrospective approach with the date of initial application
being 1 July 2018 with the cumulative effect of initially applying AASB 15 recognised as an adjustment to the
opening balance of retained earnings. The Group elected to apply the standard only to contracts that were not
completed contracts at the initial date of application. The comparative information has not been restated and
continues to be reported under AASB 118 and related interpretations.
Overall impact
The Group’s revenue from contracts with customers comprises two main streams being the sale of gold
bullion and revenue generated from mining and contracting services. The Group undertook a comprehensive
analysis of the impact of the new revenue standard based on a review of the contractual terms of its principal
revenue streams with the primary focus being to understand whether the timing and amount of revenue
recognised could differ under AASB 15. For all of the Group’s revenue streams, the nature and timing of
satisfaction of the performance obligations, and, hence, the amount and timing of revenue recognised under
AASB 15, is the same as that under AASB 118 except for the impact of significant financing component on
gold sales. The accounting policy of the Group on revenue from contracts with customers is disclosed in more
detail in note 2(t).
Impact on Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income upon adoption
Gold bullion
Gold bullion sales are either directly to the Perth Mint at spot under a long-term sales contract, to various
banks under forward sales contracts or to Citibank N.A. under a prepaid facility. The only performance
obligation under the contracts is the sale of gold bullion. As there are no other performance obligations the
transaction price is allocated to the one performance obligation.
There were no changes identified with respect to the timing or amount of revenue recognition in relation to
sales at spot or the forward sales as the transaction price is determined at the transaction date, being the
date control of the gold bullion passes.
For sales under the gold pre-pay facility, the Group receives advances from the customer for the sale of
refined gold. The amount received in advance of the sale is recognised as unearned income (contract liability)
and is released to revenue when the sale is recognised. The unearned income on the gold pre-pay facility is
disclosed in note 24 of the financial report.
At the date of initial application of AASB 15, the Group assessed existing contracts and concluded that the
financing component was not significant. Prior to the adoption of AASB 15 no interest was accrued on long
term advances received.
Mining and contracting services
Revenue generated from mining and contracting services include the provision of equipment and personnel to
carry out the mining activities. This is consistent with how these have been recognised previously under AASB
18, and no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings is required. Accordingly, upon adoption
of AASB 15 on 1 July 2018, there was no significant impact on the financial statement related to mining and
contracting services.
Impact of the adoption of AASB 15 on the current period financial statements
The adoption of AASB 15 has resulted to an increase in assets from the capitalisation of interest expense
($2,407,894), unearned income ($541,594), and revenues ($1,866,000) as on the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows during the year. As an eligible borrowing
cost, the interest expense was capitalised to qualifying assets during the year in accordance with the Group’s
policy for borrowing costs disclosed in note 2(i). The impact on earnings per share resulting from the increase
in revenues is not material.
New and amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued but not yet effective
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that are issued, but are not yet effective, up to the date of
issuance of the Groups financial statements are disclosed below. The Group intends to adopt these standards
and interpretations, if applicable, when they become effective.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
103
AASB 16 Leases
AASB 16 was issued in January 2016 and it replaces AASB 117 Leases, AASB interpretation 4 Determining
whether an Arrangements contains a lease, AASB Interpretation-115 Operating Lease-Incentives and AASB
Interpretation 127 Evaluating the Substance of Transactions involving the Legal form of a Lease. AASB 16 sets
out the principles for the recognition on-balance sheet model similar to the accounting for finance leases
under AASB 117. The standards include two recognition exemptions for lessees – leases of ‘low-value’ assets
and short-term leases. At the commencement date of a lease, a lessee will recognise a liability to make lease
payments and an asset represent the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term. Lessees will
be required to separately recognize the interest expense on the lease liability and the depreciation expense
on the right-of-use asset.
Lessees will be also required to re-measure the lease liability upon the occurrence of certain events (e.g., a
change in the lease term, a change in future lease payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used
to determine those payments). The lessee will generally recognise the amount of the re-measurement of the
lease liability as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
AASB 16, which is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2019, required lessees to make
more extensive disclosures than under AASB 117.
Transition to AASB 16
The Group plans to adopt AASB 16 using the modified retrospective approach at the date of initial application,
which means it will apply the standard from 1 July 2019, the cumulative impact of adoption will be recognised
as at 1 July 2019 and comparatives will not be restated.
The Group will elect to use the exemptions proposed by the standard on lease contracts for which the lease
terms ends within 12 months as of the date of initial application, and lease contracts for which the underlying
asset is of low-value. The Group has leases of certain office equipment (printing and photocopying machines)
that are considered of low-value.
As of 30 June 2019, the Group continued to progress its detailed impact assessment and implementation
project of AASB 16. Much of the early part of the year was spent focusing on reviewing contracts, aggregating
data to support the evaluation of the accounting impacts and identifying where key policy decisions were
required.
The Group’s existing operating leases will be the main source of leases under the new standard. Information
on the Group’s operating lease commitments under AASB 117 Leases (undiscounted) is disclosed in Note 29.
Work completed by the Group to date indicates the new leases standard is expected to have a material
effect on the Group’s financial statements as it will significantly increase the Group’s recognised assets and
liabilities. In summary the impact of AASB 16 is to create a Right-of-use asset and a Lease liability of at least
$12,500,000.
As a result of the creation of a right-of-use asset and lease liability, depreciation expense and interest expense
are expected to increase and operating lease expense will be reduced. In addition, the classification between
cash flow from operating activities and cash flow from financing activities will also change. Many commonly
used financial ratios and performance metrics for the Group, using existing definitions, will also be impacted
including net debt, gearing, EBITDA, unit costs and operating cash flows.
AASB 2018-1 Annual Improvements 2015-2017 Cycle
AASB2018-1 is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2019.
The amendments clarify certain requirements in:
• AASB 3 Business Combinations and AASB 11 Joint Arrangements - previously held interest in a joint
operation
• AASB 112 Income Taxes - income tax consequences of payments on financial instruments classified as
equity
• AASB 123 Borrowing Costs - borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation.
The Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the amendment.
AASB Interpretation 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments
AASB Interpretation 23 is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2019. The Interpretation
addresses the accounting for income taxes when tax treatments involve uncertainty that affects the application
of AASB 112 and does not apply to taxes or levies outside the scope of AASB 112, nor does it specifically
include requirements relating to interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax treatments.
• Whether an entity considers uncertain tax treatments separately
•
The assumptions an entity makes about the examination of tax treatments by taxation authorities
• How an entity determines taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and
tax rates
• How an entity considers changes in facts and circumstances.
The Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the new interpretation.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019 104
38. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CONTINUED)
AASB 2019-1 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
AASB 2019-1 is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2020.
The revised Conceptual Framework includes some new concepts, provides updated definitions and recognition
criteria for assets and liabilities and clarifies some important concepts. It is arranged in eight chapters, as
follows:
• Chapter 1 – The objective of financial reporting
• Chapter 2 – Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information
• Chapter 3 – Financial statements and the reporting entity
• Chapter 4 – The elements of financial statements
• Chapter 5 – Recognition and derecognition
• Chapter 6 – Measurement
• Chapter 7 – Presentation and disclosure
• Chapter 8 – Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
AASB 2019-1 has also been issued, which sets out the amendments to Australian Accounting Standards,
Interpretations and other pronouncements in order to update references to the revised Conceptual
Framework. The changes to the Conceptual Framework may affect the application of accounting standards in
situations where no standard applies to a particular transaction or event. In addition, relief has been provided
in applying AASB 3 and developing accounting policies for regulatory account balances using AASB 108, such
that entities must continue to apply the definitions of an asset and a liability (and supporting concepts) in the
Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (July 2004), and not the definitions
in the revised Conceptual Framework.
The Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the new Conceptual Framework.
AASB 2018-6 Definition of a Business
AASB 2018-6 is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2020.
The Standard amends the definition of a business in AASB 3 Business Combinations. The amendments
clarify the minimum requirements for a business, remove the assessment of whether market participants
are capable of replacing missing elements, add guidance to help entities assess whether an acquired process
is substantive, narrow the definitions of a business and of outputs, and introduce an optional fair value
concentration test.
The Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the new amendment.
AASB 2018-7 Definition of Material
AASB 2018-7 is effective for annual periods being on or after 1 January 2020.
This Standard amends AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements and AAS 108 Accounting Policies,
Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors to align the definition of ‘material’ across the standards and to
clarify certain aspects of the definition. The amendments clarify that materiality will depend on the nature
or magnitude of information. An entity will need to assess whether the information, either individually or in
combination with other information, is material in the context of the financial statements. A misstatement of
information is material if it could reasonably be expected to influence decisions made by the primary users.
The Group is in the process of assessing the impact of the new amendment.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2019
105
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Westgold Resources Limited, I state that:
In the opinion of the Directors:
(a) the financial statements and notes of the Company and of the Group are in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2019
and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with the Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting
Interpretations) and Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(b) the financial statements and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as
disclosed in note 2(b) and;
(c) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when
they become due and payable; and
(d) this declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the Directors
in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June
2019.
As at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the members of the
Closed Group identified in Note 34 will be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are or
may become subject, by virtue of the Deed of Cross Guarantee.
On behalf of the Board.
PG Cook
Managing Director
Perth, 26 August 2019
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 106
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
Ernst & Young
11 Mounts Bay Road
Perth WA 6000 Australia
GPO Box M939 Perth WA 6843
Tel: +61 8 9429 2222
Fax: +61 8 9429 2436
ey.com/au
Independent auditor's report to the members of Westgold Resources
Limited
Report on the audit of the financial report
Opinion
We have audited the financial report of Westgold Resources Limited (the Company) and its subsidiaries
(collectively the Group), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June
2019, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity
and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes to the financial statements,
including a summary of significant accounting policies, and the directors' declaration.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act
2001, including:
a)
b)
giving a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 30 June 2019
and of its consolidated financial performance for the year ended on that date; and
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial
Report section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the auditor
independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and the ethical requirements of the Accounting
Professional and Ethical Standards Board’s APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (the
Code) that are relevant to our audit of the financial report in Australia. We have also fulfilled our other
ethical responsibilities in accordance with the Code.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our opinion.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our
audit of the financial report of the current year. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit
of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide a separate
opinion on these matters. For each matter below, our description of how our audit addressed the matter
is provided in that context.
We have fulfilled the responsibilities described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Financial Report section of our report, including in relation to these matters. Accordingly, our audit
included the performance of procedures designed to respond to our assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the financial report. The results of our audit procedures, including the procedures
performed to address the matters below, provide the basis for our audit opinion on the accompanying
financial report.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
107 INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
1. Recoverability of non-current assets
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
As at 30 June 2019, the Group had capitalised mine
properties and development costs, property, plant and
equipment, capitalised exploration and evaluation
expenditure totaling $498.06 million (refer to Notes
17, 16 and 18 of the financial report).
At the end of each reporting period, the Group
exercises judgment in determining whether there is
any indication of impairment on its cash-generating
units (CGUs) or indication that an impairment loss
recognised in prior periods should be reversed. If any
such indicators exist, the Group estimates the
recoverable amount of that CGU. No indicators of
impairment or indicators of reversal of prior period
impairment were identified in the current period.
Changes to key factors and assumptions or a failure to
identify impairment indicators could lead the Group
incorrectly fail to test the recoverable amount of the
CGUs at balance date.
Accordingly, this was considered to be a key audit
matter.
We assessed how the Group sought to identify indicators of
impairment on its CGUs and the evaluated the
completeness of factors it considered in the assessment.
Our audit procedures included the following:
• Comparison of the Group’s market capitalisation
relative to its net assets
• We considered the Group’s process for identifying and
considering external and internal information which
may be an indicator of impairment
• Considered the forecast results used by the Group in
their last impairment test and the key assumptions
used by comparing these to current operating results
of the CGUs. This includes gold prices, production
levels, operating and capital costs, and reserves and
resources estimates
• Our valuation specialists were involved to provide data
relating to future metals prices and market trading and
transaction multiples to assess whether there are
negative changes in the market that may suggest
indicators of impairment
• Understood the changes in reserves and resources
estimates during the year and assessed whether the
changes provided any evidence of impairment
• Assessed the qualifications, competence and
objectivity of the Group’s internal experts whose work
formed the basis of the Group’s estimation of mineral
reserves and resources quantities
• Considered the Group’s assessment of indicators of
impairment of exploration and evaluation assets in
accordance with AASB 6 Exploration for and Evaluation
of Mineral Resources. This included testing of material
areas of interest with capitalised costs as at 30 June
2019 to assess whether rights to tenure are current
and whether there are active and significant continuing
exploration and evaluation activities in the area.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT 108
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
2. Rehabilitation and restoration provisions
Why significant
How our audit addressed the key audit matter
As a consequence of its operations, the Group incurs
obligations to restore and rehabilitate the
environment. Rehabilitation activities are governed by
a combination of legislative requirements and Group
policies. As at 30 June 2019, the Group’s
consolidated statement of financial position includes
provisions of $69.02 million in respect of such
obligations.
Estimating the costs associated with these future
activities requires considerable judgment in relation to
factors such as timing of the rehabilitation, the costs
associated with the rehabilitation activities and
economic assumptions such as discount rates and
inflation rates.
Accordingly, this was considered to be a key audit
matter.
We evaluated the assumptions and methodologies used by
the Group in determining their rehabilitation obligations.
Our audit procedures included the following:
• Our rehabilitation specialists considered the
rehabilitation plans and assessed whether the Group’s
cost estimates were reasonable considering industry
benchmarks and relevant legislative requirements. Our
rehabilitation specialists also compared the data used
in calculating the provision to the mine closure plans
submitted to Department of Mines and Petroleum and
the reasonableness of year-on-year changes to the
obligation
• Evaluated the Group’s treatment of changes in the
rehabilitation provision from the prior year
• Assessed the qualifications, competence and
objectivity of the Group’s internal and external experts,
the work of whom, formed the basis of the Group’s
rehabilitation cost estimates
• Assessed the adequacy of the Group's disclosures
relating to rehabilitation obligations.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
109 INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
Information other than the financial report and auditor’s report thereon
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information
included in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report other than the financial report and our auditor’s report
thereon. We obtained the Directors’ Report and the Corporate Governance Statement that are to be
included in the Annual Report, prior to the date of this auditor’s report, and we expect to obtain the
remaining sections of the Annual Report after the date of this auditor’s report.
Our opinion on the financial report does not cover the other information and we do not and will not
express any form of assurance conclusion thereon, with the exception of the Remuneration Report and
our related assurance opinion.
In connection with our audit of the financial report, our responsibility is to read the other information and,
in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial report or
our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If, based on the work we have performed on the other information obtained prior to the date of this
auditor’s report, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are
required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial report
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true
and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for
such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial
report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial report, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters relating to going concern and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial report
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report as a whole is free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of
users taken on the basis of this financial report.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT 110
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
As part of an audit in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional
judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
►
►
►
►
►
►
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud
or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence
that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a
material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud
may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by the directors.
Conclude on the appropriateness of the directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If
we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s
report to the related disclosures in the financial report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our
auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as
a going concern.
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial report, including the
disclosures, and whether the financial report represents the underlying transactions and events in a
manner that achieves fair presentation.
Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the financial report. We are
responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely
responsible for our audit opinion.
We communicate with the directors regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the
audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we
identify during our audit.
We also provide the directors with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may
reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated to the directors, we determine those matters that were of most
significance in the audit of the financial report of the current year and are therefore the key audit
matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public
disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should
not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be
expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
111 INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT
Report on the audit of the Remuneration Report
Opinion on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors' report for the year ended 30 June
2019.
In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Westgold Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June
2019, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
Responsibilities
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration
Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian
Auditing Standards.
Ernst & Young
Philip Teale
Partner
Perth
26 August 2019
A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
PT:CT:WESTGOLD:036
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT 112
SECURITY HOLDER INFORMATION AS
AT 8 OCTOBER 2019
(a) Top 20 Quoted Shareholders
HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED
SUN HUNG KAI INVESTMENT SERVICES LIMITED
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above