More annual reports from Wireless Telecom Group:
2021 ReportPeers and competitors of Wireless Telecom Group:
Sierra Wireless2009 ANNUAL REPORT 01_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:00 PM Page 3 Message from the CEO Dear Shareholders, The year 2009 represents one of significant change and overall business alignment for Wireless Telecom Group. The actions taken this year will allow us to focus on our core competencies and create the foundation for us to pave our way towards a brighter and more robust future.The cornerstone of that change is the unwavering commitment and focus shared by me, Executive Management and the Board of Directors, to take the steps necessary to return the Company to profitability and to improve Shareholder value for our investors. The economic downturn affected revenue levels of each of our product lines in the first half of 2009. Efforts were made to reduce operating costs to offset the effects on reduced profits.Throughout this downturn, we were able to maintain our strong cash position. In 2009, the Company’s Executive Management and Board decided to take steps to streamline our operations and focus on our core radio frequency and microwave technologies in the Noisecom, Boonton and Microlab business lines. We excel in these business lines and maintain strong market positions as evidenced by our long list of valued customers, many of which are blue chip companies. We reaffirm every day our commitment to continue to add value to our customers’ business models and provide solution oriented products that meet their needs in a practical, effective and flexible manner. In order to take the first step in this direction, Executive Management and the Board took a hard look at the future direction, where we want to be headed, and a close look at what has historically made us successful as a Company. In light of this review, we decided, in the fourth quarter of 2009, to sell the Willtek Communications division as we concluded it was not in alignment with our strategic plan. On April 9, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell substantially all of the assets of its Willtek Communications business line. As a result, the Company was able to secure significant tax benefits for 2009 as well as in future years of operation. My focus in the next year will be the continued improvement in the financial results of the Company coupled with our continued dedication and solution oriented sales efforts to maintain the highest levels of customer satisfaction. We have dedicated and professional employees that are second to none. Our Channel partners have demonstrated their success in developing creative and successful efforts to pursue growth in current and new markets. We are going to increase our efforts in this regard and maintain our ability to deliver strong financial results to our valued shareholders. I encourage you to read through this year’s annual report with a critical eye and formulate questions for the upcoming annual meeting on June 8, 2010. At the annual meeting you will be able to interact directly with me, Executive Management and the Board of Directors and understand, first hand, the efforts we are taking to drive forward the growth and profits of the Company. We thank you, our Shareholders, for your continued support and look forward to a successful 2010. Best regards, Paul Genova Total Control… even with your eye closed. Noisecom’s random and deterministic noise generators The latest J7000A instruments provide combined Rj and Dj put you in total control of your signal-to-noise ratio output for all your compliance test requirements including: (SNR) when measuring eye closure and BER. The latest generation of Serial Data compliance standards require • PCI Express noise immunity testing as part of the solution, and an impor- • USB tant part of that testing is repeatability. High performance • 10 GigE attenuators provide repeatable eye closure, while maintain- • SATA ing wide dynamic range that allow high crest factor output to emulate rare events. Optional fi lters are available that For more information visit us at noisecom.com/J7000 shape the noise profi le for use with multiple standards. or call +1 973-386-9696. Visit us at the 2010 DesignCon Show, Booth #707 Microlab has taken Hybrid Technology to new heights The Highest performance, the Highest quality…Microlab delivers the Highest value with immediate “off-the-shelf” availability. When system performance is critical, Microlab Hybrid solutions will take your application to the next level… Satisfaction guaranteed! • Broadest-band • Highest Isolation • Lowest Loss • Superior PIM Performance • Highest Power • Multiple Confi gurations • “Off-the-Shelf” Availability Come visit us at IWCE 2009 booth # 1554. For more information visit: www.microlab.fxr.com or call +1 973-386-9696. 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 1 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS of Financial Condition and Results of Operations INTRODUCTION Wireless Telecom Group, Inc., and its operating subsidiaries, (collectively, the “Company”), develop, manufacture and market a wide variety of electronic noise sources, electronic testing and measuring instruments including power meters, voltmeters and modulation meters and high- power passive microwave components for wireless products. The Company’s products have historically been primarily used to test the performance and capability of cellular/PCS and satellite communication systems and to measure the power of RF and microwave systems. Other applications include radio, radar, wireless local area network (WLAN) and digital television. As was disclosed earlier in this report, as a result of the expected sale of Willtek, the Company has reflected its foreign activities as assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations in its 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements. The financial information presented herein includes: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of forward- looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates” or “continues” or the negative thereof of other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on the Company’s current expectations of future events and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, continued ability to maintain positive cash flow from results of operations, continued evaluation of goodwill for impairment and the Company’s development and production of competitive technologies in our market sector, among others. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. These risks and uncertainties are disclosed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company’s press releases and in oral statements made by or with the approval of authorized personnel. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES Estimates and assumptions Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses for each period. The following represents a summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that the Company believes are: (a) the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and (b) that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates and assumptions are made by management to assess the overall likelihood that an accounting estimate or assumption may require adjustment. Management assumptions have been reasonably accurate in the past, and future estimates or assumptions are likely to be calculated on the same basis. Stock-based compensation The Company follows the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, “Share-Based Payment”. The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the performance-based options granted in 2009 and 2008, the Company took into consideration guidance under ASC 718 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) when reviewing and updating assumptions.The expected option life is derived from assumed exercise rates based upon historical exercise patterns and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our shares using weekly price observations over an observation period of three years. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve rate in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected option life.The estimated forfeiture rate included in the option valuation was zero. Revenue recognition Revenue from product shipments, including shipping and handling fees, is recognized once delivery has occurred provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 1 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 2 Sales to international distributors are recognized in the same manner. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, then revenue recognition is deferred until that time.There are no formal sales incentives offered to any of the Company’s customers. Volume discounts may be offered from time to time to customers purchasing large quantities on a per transaction basis. There are no special post shipment obligations or acceptance provisions that exist with any sales arrangements. Inventory Raw material inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Finished goods and work-in-process are valued at average cost of production, which includes material, labor and manufacturing expenses. Comprehensive income (loss)/Foreign currency Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated at period-end exchange rates, while income and expenses are translated at average rates for the period.Translation gains and losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the statement of shareholders’ equity in accordance with ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income”. Allowances for doubtful accounts The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. A key consideration in estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts has been, and will continue to be, our customer’s payment history and aging of its accounts receivable balance. Income taxes The Company records deferred taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This ASC requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company periodically assesses the value of its deferred tax asset, a majority of which has been generated by a history of net operating losses and determines the necessity for a valuation allowance. The Company evaluates which portion, if any, will more likely than not be realized by offsetting future taxable income, taking into consideration any limitations that may exist on its use of its net operating loss carry-forwards. be sustained on examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements attributable to such position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon the ultimate resolution of the position. By adoption of ASC 740, the Company has analyzed its filing positions in all of the federal, state and foreign jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has identified its federal tax return, its state tax return in New Jersey and its foreign return in Germany as “major” tax jurisdictions, as defined, in which it is required to file income tax returns. Based on the evaluations noted above, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition or disclosure in its consolidated financial statements. Based on a review of tax positions for all open years and contingencies as set out in Company’s notes to the consolidated financial statements, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to ASC 740 during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the Company does not anticipate that it is reasonably possible that any material increase or decrease in its unrecognized tax benefits will occur within twelve months. Valuation of goodwill The Company reviews its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also reviews goodwill annually in accordance with ASC 350, “Accounting for Business Combinations, Goodwill, and Other Intangible Assets.” The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is ongoing, subjective and requires significant judgment and estimates regarding future cash flows and forecasts. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over fair value of net assets acquired. Testing for the impairment of goodwill involves a two step process.The first step of the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting units fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill. The goodwill on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is attributable to Microlab/FXR. Uncertain Tax Position Under ASC 740, the Company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain position only if it is more-likely-than-not the tax position will Impairment of long-lived assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 2 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 3 on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use of the assets and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold for sale is based on the fair value of the assets. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 COMPARED TO 2008 Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $22,828,328 as compared to $25,674,576 for the year ended 2008, a decrease of $2,846,248 or 11.1%. This decrease was primarily the result of weakened demand due to the general decline in the economy for the Company’s products and services throughout 2009. The Company’s gross profit on net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $10,628,932 or 46.6% as compared to $11,984,368 or 46.7% as reported in the previous year. Gross profit dollars are slightly lower in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to lower revenues and product mix sold.The Company did, however, offset the negative effects of lower volume and mix of product sold by closely managing labor and overhead costs, resulting in relatively consistent gross margins when compared year over year. The Company can experience variations in gross profit based upon the mix of product sales as well as variations due to revenue volume and economies of scale. The Company will continue to rigidly monitor costs associated with material acquisition, manufacturing and production. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $11,552,881 or 50.6% of net sales as compared to $11,709,661 45.62% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the prior year, operating expenses decreased by $156,780. Operating expenses are lower in 2009 due to a reduction in headcount, decreased spending in both research and development and sales and marketing, and a decrease in general and administrative expenses. The decrease in general and administrative expense is attributable to lower non-cash stock option charges and professional and consulting fees, specifically, non-recurring advisory fees relating to the Company’s initial Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts during 2008 which required significantly more reliance on outside consulting, partially off-set by, officers severance amounting to approximately $232,000, fully accrued for in 2009. Interest income decreased by $208,696 for the year ended December 31, 2009.This decrease was primarily due to the decline in interest rates in the Company’s investment account in 2009. In reaction to uncertain financial market conditions, the Company has reallocated substantially all of its cash investments to more secure money market funds. Other income increased by $75,266 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the recording of realized losses from the sale of investment securities in 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company realized a tax benefit, net of a valuation allowance, of $6,366,851, of which approximately $1,900,000 will be realized in a carryback claim from taxes paid in prior years. The remaining tax benefit of approximately $4,500,000 will be utilized to offset taxable income in future years.The effect of this tax benefit on earnings per share in 2009 was an increase of $0.25 per share. Net income from continuing operations was $5,460,322 or $0.21 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to a net loss from continuing operations of $152,810 or $0.01 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $5,613,132. The increase was primarily due to tax benefits as mentioned above, net of a decline in gross profit from 2008 to 2009 of $1,355,436. Net loss from discontinued operations was $3,428,069 or $0.13 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to a net loss from discontinued operations of $31,112,255 or $1.21 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2008, a loss decrease of $27,684,186. The 2009 loss was primarily due to the $3,348,122 loss recognized in 2009 on the anticipated sale of Willtek. Losses were significantly greater in 2008 primarily due to goodwill and other intangible assets impairment charges of $33,131,901. Net income was $2,032,253 or $0.08 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to a net loss of $31,265,065 or $1.22 per share on a diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $33,297,318. The increase was primarily due to the analysis mentioned above. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company’s working capital has decreased by $1,769,751 to $26,153,974 at December 31, 2009, from $27,923,725 at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2009, the Company had a current ratio of 4.4 to 1, and a ratio of debt to tangible net worth of .4 to 1. At December 31, 2008, the Company had a current ratio of 4.4 to 1, and a ratio of debt to tangible net worth of .4 to 1. The Company had a cash balance of $14,076,382 at December 31, 2009, compared to a cash and short-term investment balance of $11,603,789 at December 31, 2008. The Company believes its current level of cash is sufficient enough to fund the current operating, investing and financing activities. including discontinued operations, provided Operating activities, $3,108,709 in cash for the year ending December 31, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2008, operating activities, including discontinued operations, provided $2,553,434 in cash flows. For 2009, cash provided by operations was primarily due to decreases in accounts receivable and inventory, partially off-set by an increase in prepaid expenses, recoverability of taxes and other assets, and a decrease in accounts Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 3 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 4 payable and accrued expenses. For 2008, cash provided by operations was primarily due to decreases in inventory and accounts receivable, and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially off- set by an increase in prepaid expenses, income taxes recoverable and other assets and a decrease in income taxes payable. The Company has historically been able to turn over its accounts receivable approximately every two months. This average collection period has been sufficient to provide the working capital and liquidity necessary to operate the Company. Net cash provided by investing activities for 2009 amounted to $4,731,285 compared to net cash used for investing activities of $5,536,558 for the year ending December 31, 2008. For 2009 the primary source of cash was proceeds from the sale of investment securities, off-set by capital expenditures. For 2008 the primary use of cash was for the purchase of short-term investment securities and capital expenditures, partially off-set by proceeds from the sale of investment securities. Financing activities used $423,898 in cash for the year ended December 31, 2009.The use of these funds was for payments made on its bank and mortgage note payable. Financing activities used $725,000 in cash for the year ended December 31, 2008.The use of these funds was for the acquisition of treasury stock and payments made on its bank and mortgage note payable. Other than contractual obligations incurred in the normal course of business, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements. Table of Contractual Obligations Mortgage Facility Leases Bank Note Payable Operating and Equipment Leases On January 17, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 5% of the Company’s common stock. During the first and second quarters of 2008, the Company made purchases from time to time in the open market. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has repurchased 295,958 shares of its common stock at a cost of $477,885.The authorized repurchase program does not have an expiration date and the timing and amount of shares repurchased will be determined by a number of factors including the levels of cash generation from operations, cash requirements for investments, and current share price. The stock repurchase program may be modified or discontinued at any time. In September 2009, the Company secured a line of credit with its investment bank.The credit facility provides borrowing availability of up to 100% of the Company’s money market account balance and 99% of the Company’s short-term investment securities (U.S.Treasury bills) and, under the terms and conditions of the loan agreement, is fully secured by said money fund account and short-term investment holdings. Advances under the facility will bear interest at a variable rate equal to the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) in effect at time of borrowing. Additionally, under the terms and conditions of the loan agreement, there is no annual fee and any amount outstanding under the loan facility may be paid at any time in whole or in part without penalty. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no borrowings Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 4 Payments by Period Total $2,834,645 837,833 1,688,571 186,033 $5,547,082 Less than 1 Year $ 63,386 502,700 375,238 74,812 $1,016,136 1-3 Years $2,771,259 335,133 1,125,714 111,221 $4,343,327 4-5 Years $ — — 187,619 — $187,619 outstanding under the facility and approximately $6,400,000 of borrowing availability. The Company believes that its financial resources from working capital provided by operations are adequate to meet its current needs. However, should current global economic conditions continue to deteriorate, additional working capital funding may be required which may be difficult to obtain due to restrictive credit markets. Throughout its ownership of Willtek, the Company had been required to fund its foreign operations through cash loans and advances. Therefore, the Company believes the disposition of Willtek will have a positive impact on its ability to generate future cash flows from operations. Furthermore, more specifically, the Company believes that by scaling its business to more manageable levels, coupled with the expected future cash benefits associated with the utilization of its net operating loss carryforwards, the Company should improve upon its liquidity and become profitable in its continuing operations going forward. However, if the Company does not successfully close on this disposition, the Company could incur significant restructuring costs, including significant employee severance and notice payments. Inflation and Seasonality The Company does not anticipate that inflation will significantly impact its business nor does it believe that its business is seasonal. 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 5 Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available. The Company will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011; however, earlier application is permitted.The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.” This ASU clarifies how an entity should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions on the transfer of a liability should not be included in its fair value measurement.The effective date of this ASU is the first reporting period after issuance date, August 26, 2009. The Company adopted this ASU for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.The adoption of this ASU did not have a impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.The FASB will now issue new standards in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”).The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance have been updated for the Codification throughout this document. The Codification did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB and included in ASC 855, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In April 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB that requires disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments for interim financial statements of publicly traded companies, which is included in the Codification in ASC 825, “Financial Instruments.” The adoption of ASC 825 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In January 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB and included in ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, and ASC 810, “Non controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” The application of these ASCs is intended to improve, simplify and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements.The adoption of these ASCs did not have any impact on its consolidated financial statements. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 5 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 6 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate Risk The Company’s bank loan and the associated interest expense are not sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates. The Company’s note was interest free through June 2008 and began bearing interest at the annual rate of 4% beginning July 2008. The note requires twelve half- yearly payments beginning December 2008 until maturity at June 2014. As a result, the Company is not subject to market risk for changes in interest rates and will not be subjected to increased or decreased interest payments if market rates fluctuate and the Company is in a borrowing mode. Industry Risk The electronic test and measurement industry is cyclical which can cause significant fluctuations in sales, gross profit margins and profits, from year to year. It is difficult to predict the timing of the changing cycles in the electronic test and measurement industry. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 6 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 7 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS Assets Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investment in short-term U.S. treasury securities, at cost Accounts receivable — net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $155,173 and $101,386 for 2009 and 2008, respectively Income taxes recoverable — net Inventories Deferred income taxes — current Prepaid expenses and other current assets Assets held for sale Total Current Assets Property, Plant and Equipment — Net Other Assets: Goodwill Deferred income taxes — non-current, net Other assets Total Other Assets Total Assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Current Liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued expenses and other current liabilities Current portion of note payable — bank Current portion of mortgage payable Liabilities held for sale Total Current Liabilities Long Term Liabilities: Note payable — bank Mortgage payable Deferred rent payable Total Long Term Liabilities Commitments and Contingencies Shareholders’ Equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued Common stock, $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 28,753,861 shares issued, 25,658,203 shares outstanding Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings (deficit) Accumulated other comprehensive income Treasury stock, at cost — 3,095,658 shares Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. December 31, 2009 2008 $14,076,382 — $6,627,397 4,976,392 3,023,318 1,910,846 6,944,231 464,192 523,642 6,978,163 3,474,334 1,551,000 6,883,712 198,216 495,885 11,974,872 33,920,774 36,181,808 4,436,339 4,858,059 1,351,392 4,560,312 863,023 6,774,727 1,351,392 527,599 613,751 2,492,742 $45,131,840 $43,532,609 $ 904,542 1,930,225 375,238 63,386 4,493,409 7,766,800 1,313,333 2,771,259 90,946 4,175,538 $ 995,837 1,317,933 369,059 58,784 5,516,470 8,258,083 1,660,768 2,834,645 101,666 4,597,079 — — 287,539 37,528,841 1,985,181 934,755 (7,546,814) 287,539 37,259,386 (47,072) 724,408 (7,546,814) 33,189,502 30,677,447 $45,131,840 $43,532,609 Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 7 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 8 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Net Sales Cost of Sales Gross Profit Operating Expenses Research and development Sales and marketing General and administrative Total Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) Other (Income) Expense Interest (income) Interest expense — net Other (income) — net Total Other (Income) Expense Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Provision (Benefit) from Income Taxes Provision (Benefit) from Income Taxes Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (Loss) from Discontinued Operations — Net of Taxes Net Income (Loss) Income (Loss) per Common Share: Basic and diluted Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net Income per Common Share Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: Basic and diluted The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 2008 $22,828,328 12,199,396 $ 25,674,576 13,690,208 10,628,932 11,984,368 2,066,018 4,158,836 5,328,027 2,115,193 4,210,921 5,383,547 11,552,881 11,709,661 (923,949) 274,707 (45,869) 277,037 (248,588) (17,420) (906,529) (6,366,851) 5,460,322 (3,428,069) (254,565) 221,017 (173,322) (206,870) 481,577 634,387 (152,810) (31,112,255) $ 2,032,253 $(31,265,065) $ $ $ 0.21 (0.13) 0.08 $ $ $ (0.01) (1.21) (1.22) 25,658,203 25,712,424 Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 8 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 9 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings (Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Treasury Stock at Cost Total Balance at December 31, 2007 $ 287,539 $ 36,785,310 $ 31,217,993 $ 328,770 $ (7,068,929) $ 61,550,683 Net (loss) Foreign currency translation Amount recognized for employee pension obligation Comprehensive (loss) Stock options expensed Purchase of treasury stock — — — — — — — — — — 474,076 — (31,265,065) — — — — — — 71,752 323,886 — — — — — — — — (477,885) (31,265,065) 71,752 323,886 (30,869,427) 474,076 (477,885) Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 287,539 $ 37,259,386 $ (47,072) $ 724,408 $ (7,546,814) $ 30,677,447 Net income Foreign currency translation Amount recognized for employee pension obligation Comprehensive income Stock options expensed — — — — — — — — — 269,455 2,032,253 — — — — — 293,448 (83,101) — — — — — — — 2,032,253 293,448 (83,101) 2,242,600 269,455 Balance at December 31, 2009 $287,539 $37,528,841 $ 1,985,181 $934,755 $(7,546,814) $33,189,502 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 9 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 10 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Cash Flow from Operating Activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Amortization — net Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets Loss on sale of discontinued operations Stock compensation expense Realized loss on sale of investment securities Interest on investment securities Deferred rent Deferred income taxes Recovery of doubtful accounts Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable Inventory Income taxes payable Prepaid expenses, income taxes recoverable and other current assets Other long-term liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses Net cash provided by operating activities Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Capital expenditures Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant and equipment Purchase of short-term securities Proceeds from sale of investment securities Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Payments of mortgage note Payment on bank note payable Acquisition of treasury stock Net cash (used for) financing activities Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of year Cash and Cash Equivalents, at End of Year Supplemental Information: Cash paid during the year for: Taxes Interest The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 10 For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 2008 $ 2,032,253 $(31,265,065) 868,790 42,409 — 3,348,122 269,455 — (27,184) (10,720) (4,298,689) 75,284 1,041,512 985,587 9,272 (592,478) 42,881 (677,785) 963,915 908,100 33,131,901 — 474,076 158,249 — (3,974) (3,784,556) 19,850 1,415,313 1,423,918 (208,266) (1,207,375) (34,538) 561,886 3,108,709 2,553,434 (276,631) 4,340 — 5,003,576 (377,107) 14,890 (5,887,444) 713,103 4,731,285 (5,536,558) (58,784) (365,114) — (423,898) 32,889 (54,517) (192,598) (477,885) (725,000) (51,729) 7,448,985 (3,759,853) 6,627,397 10,387,250 $14,076,382 $ 6,627,397 $ $ 304,850 294,994 $ 1,027,155 268,955 $ 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 11 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Organization and Basis of Presentation: Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company), develops and manufactures a wide variety of electronic noise sources, testing and measurement instruments and high-power, passive microwave components, which it sells to customers throughout the United States and worldwide through its foreign sales corporation and foreign distributors to commercial and government customers in the electronics industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Boonton Electronics Corporation, Microlab/FXR, Willtek Communications GmbH, WTG Foreign Sales Corporation and NC Mahwah, Inc. All intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation. During 2008, and continuing through 2009, Willtek Communications GmbH (“Willtek”) experienced a decline in revenues and, consequently, a decline in gross margins primarily due to an overall industry slowdown in worldwide cellular handset demand. In light of these, and other, current market challenges facing Willtek, including significant research and development expenses required to remain competitive, management evaluated several strategic alternatives and opportunities, such as, restructuring the existing business, finding a strategic partner, making additional investments in technology research and development or a sale of some or all of the Willtek assets. In November 2009, the Company’s board of directors made a decision to conclude efforts to seek strategic alternatives regarding the operations, assets and intellectual property relating to the Company’s foreign subsidiary, Willtek, so that the Company could focus on growing its domestic based business divisions.The board of directors authorized management to begin negotiations with interested parties to sell substantially all of the assets of Willtek or cease incurring costs related to its development. On April 09, 2010, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell substantially all the operating assets and certain liabilities of Willtek. As a result of the expected sale of Willtek, which is scheduled to close during the second quarter of 2010, the Company has reflected its Willtek operation as assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations in its 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements (see Notes 2 and 14). Therefore, the succeeding information presented in these notes to the financial statements pertains primarily to the Company’s continuing operations. Use of Estimates: In preparing financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes certain estimates and assumptions, where applicable, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Concentrations of Credit Risk and Fair Value: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. The Company maintains significant cash investments primarily with two financial institutions, which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit rating of these institutions as part of its investment strategy. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the Company’s large customer base. However, at December 31, 2009, primarily all of the Company’s receivables do pertain to the telecommunications industry. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade receivables, other current assets and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. At December 31, 2009, the fair value (estimated based upon expected cash outflows discounted at current market rates) and carrying value of fixed rate mortgage and notes payable amounted to $4,578,239 and $4,523,216, respectively. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short Term Investments: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank and money market accounts. The Company classifies investments as short-term investments if their original or remaining maturities are greater than three months and their remaining maturities are one year or less. As of December 31, 2009, substantially all of the Company’s investments consisted of cash and cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable: The Company accounts for uncollectible accounts under the allowance method. Potentially uncollectible accounts are provided for throughout the year and actual bad debts are written off to the allowance on a timely basis. Inventories: Raw material inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Finished goods and work-in-process are valued at average cost of production, which includes material, labor and manufacturing expenses. Inventory carrying value is net of inventory Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 11 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 12 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) reserves of $810,904 and $787,441 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Inventories consist of: Raw materials Work-in-process Finished goods December 31, 2009 2008 $4,393,992 1,252,251 1,297,988 $4,616,113 1,108,067 1,159,532 $6,944,231 $6,883,712 Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are reflected at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight- line basis over the following useful lives: Building and improvements Machinery and equipment Furniture and fixtures Transportation equipment 39 years 5-10 years 5-10 years 3-5 years Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining term of the lease and reflect the estimated life of the improvements. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. Goodwill and other intangible assets: The Company reviews its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also reviews goodwill annually in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350, “Accounting for Business Combinations, Goodwill, and Other Intangible Assets.” The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is ongoing, subjective and requires significant judgment and estimates regarding future cash flows and forecasts. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over fair value of net assets acquired. Testing for the impairment of goodwill involves a two step process. The first step of the impairment test requires the comparing of a reporting units fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value is less than the fair value, no impairment exists and the second step is not performed. If the carrying value is higher than the fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In the second step, the impairment is computed by estimating the fair values of all recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities of the reporting unit and comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that unit’s goodwill. In accordance with this policy, during the fourth quarter of 2008, significant changes in assumptions and estimates with respect to future revenue and cash flows for the Company’s German subsidiary, Willtek Communications GmbH, occurred.These changes resulted in a goodwill and intangible assets impairment charge of $22,761,891 and $10,370,010, respectively, which was recorded as a non-cash operating expense in the fourth quarter of 2008, and represents a 100% write- down of the goodwill and intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Willtek. These impairment charges are reflected in discontinued operations in the Company’s 2008 consolidated financial statements. The goodwill remaining on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is attributable to Microlab/FXR. The following table discloses the Company’s intangible assets by classification, immediately prior to the fourth quarter 2008 impairment charge, and presents each intangible asset class at their original cost less accumulated amortization, as of December 31, 2008: Intangibles Customer relationships Trade names and trademarks Developed technology Cost Accumulated Amortization Net $10,900,000 $2,543,330 $ 8,356,670 2,000,000 1,600,000 466,660 1,120,000 1,533,340 480,000 Totals $14,500,000 $4,129,990 $10,370,010 For the year ended December 31, 2008, amortization expense of intangible assets was $1,180,000 and is included as part of discontinued operations in the Company’s 2008 consolidated statement of operations. No further charges were required for amortization of intangible assets subsequent to 2008. Impairment of long-lived assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use of the assets and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold for sale is based on the fair value of the assets. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Revenue Recognition: Revenue from product shipments, including shipping and handling fees, is recognized once delivery has occurred provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. Sales to international distributors are recognized in the same manner. If title does not pass until the product reaches the customer’s delivery site, then recognition of revenue is deferred until that time. There are no formal sales incentives offered to any of the Company’s customers. Volume discounts may be offered from time to time to customers Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 12 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 13 purchasing large quantities on a per transaction basis. There are no special post shipment obligations or acceptance provisions that exist with any sales arrangements. Research and Development Costs: Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred. The amounts charged to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $2,066,018 and $2,115,193, respectively. Advertising Costs: Advertising expenses are charged to operations during the year in which they are incurred and aggregated $357,063 and $380,666 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated at period-end exchange rates, while income and expenses are translated at average rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the statement of shareholders’ equity in accordance with ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income”. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, included in other comprehensive income (loss) was an adjustment for employee benefit obligations due to the provisions of ASC 715, “Compensation —Retirement Benefits”, as well as, foreign currency translation gains and losses. At December 31, 2009, in connection with the Company’s intent to sell substantially all of the assets of its foreign subsidiary (see Notes 2 and 14), amounts recorded in other comprehensive income were included in the determination of the gain or loss of discontinued operations. Components of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following: Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Adjustments Income (loss) Pension Liability Foreign Currency Translation $(333,880) $ 662,650 $ 328,770 Balance at December 31, 2007 Amounts recognized for employee pension costs Foreign currency translation — 71,752 323,886 — 323,886 71,752 Balance at December 31, 2008 Amounts recognized for $(262,128) $ 986,536 $ 724,408 employee pension costs Foreign currency translation — 293,448 (83,101) — (83,101) 293,448 Balance at December 31, 2009 $ 31,320 $903,435 $934,755 Stock-Based Compensation: The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, “Share-Based Payment”. The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the performance- based options granted in 2009 and 2008, the Company took into consideration guidance under ASC 718 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) when reviewing and updating assumptions. The expected option life is derived from assumed exercise rates based upon historical exercise patterns and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of our shares using weekly price observations over an observation period of three years. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve rate in effect at the time of grant for periods similar to the expected option life. The estimated forfeiture rate included in the option valuation was zero. Income Taxes: The Company records deferred taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This ASC requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements, based upon the enacted rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company periodically assesses the value of its deferred tax asset, a majority of which has been generated by a history of net operating losses and determines the necessity for a valuation allowance. The Company evaluates which portion, if any, will more likely than not be realized by offsetting future taxable income, taking into consideration any limitations that may exist on its use of its net operating loss carry-forwards. Under ASC 740, the Company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain position only if it is more-likely-than-not the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authority, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements attributable to such position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon the ultimate resolution of the position. By adoption of ASC 740, the Company has analyzed its filing positions in all of the federal, state and foreign jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has identified its federal tax return, its state tax return in New Jersey and its foreign return in Germany as “major” tax jurisdictions, as defined, in which it is required to file income tax returns. Based on the evaluations noted above, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its consolidated financial statements. Based on a review of tax positions for all open years and contingencies as set out in Company’s notes to the consolidated financial statements, Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 13 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 14 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to ASC 740 during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the Company does not anticipate that it is reasonably possible that any material increase or decrease in its unrecognized tax benefits will occur within twelve months. Income (Loss) Per Common Share: Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and, when dilutive, potential shares from stock options and warrants to purchase common stock, using the treasury stock method. In accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”, the following table reconciles basic shares outstanding to fully diluted shares outstanding. Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — Basic Potentially dilutive stock options Weighted average number of common and equivalent shares outstanding — Diluted Years Ended December 31, 2009 2008 25,658,203 — 25,712,424 — 25,658,203 25,712,424 Common stock options were not included in the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 because the various option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the period presented. The number of common stock equivalents not included in diluted earnings (loss) per share, because the effects are anti-dilutive, was 2,308,967 and 3,336,967 for 2009 and 2008, respectively. Subsequent events: The Company has evaluated subsequent events and, except for the events described with respect to the expected sale of Willtek (see Note 14), the Company has determined that there were no other subsequent events or transactions requiring recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Affecting the Company: In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 14 for the transfers. 2) Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.The Company is currently evaluating the impact this update will have on its consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements — A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This update provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available. The Company will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2011; however, earlier application is permitted.The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.” This ASU clarifies how an entity should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions on the transfer of a liability should not be included in its fair value measurement.The effective date of this ASU is the first reporting period after issuance date, August 26, 2009. The Company adopted this ASU for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 15 In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.The FASB will now issue new standards in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”).The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance have been updated for the Codification throughout this document. The Codification did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB and included in ASC 855, “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In April 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB that requires disclosure about the fair value of financial instruments for interim financial statements of publicly traded companies, which is included in the Codification in ASC 825, “Financial Instruments.” The adoption of ASC 825 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In January 2009, the Company adopted guidance issued by the FASB and included in ASC 805, “Business Combinations”, and ASC 810, “Non controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” The application of these ASCs is intended to improve, simplify and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of non-controlling interests in consolidated financial statements.The adoption of these ASCs did not have any impact on its consolidated financial statements. Reclassifications: Certain prior years’ information has been reclassified to conform to the current year’s reporting presentation, including the effect of reporting Willtek as discontinued operations. NOTE 2 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: On July 1, 2005, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity of Willtek Communications GmbH, a limited liability corporation organized under the laws of Germany (“Willtek”), in exchange for 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate value of $21,440,000, based on a closing sale price of $2.68 per share of the Company’s common stock on July 1, 2005. The acquisition was recorded by allocating the cost of the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on estimated fair values at the acquisition date. As of result of the 2005 acquisition, the Company recorded identifiable intangible assets of $14,500,000 which were being amortized over periods ranging from 5 to 15 years, and goodwill of $22,761,891. In December 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $22,761,891 and $10,370,010 for the goodwill and intangible assets of Willtek, respectively. Revenues and gross margins declined during 2008 and expected bookings of a large new customer in the fourth quarter of 2008 did not materialize. Contributing factors to the impairment charge were the continuing decline in discounted cash flows of future revenues, reduced booking orders, declining gross margins and the overall industry slowdown in worldwide cellular handset demand. In assessing the fair value of Willtek, the Company considered various valuation methods, such as discounted cash flows, comparable companies and comparable transactions. In November 2009, in light of the market challenges facing Willtek and the continuing deterioration of the Willtek operations, the Company’s board of directors made a decision to conclude efforts to seek strategic alternatives regarding the operations, assets and intellectual property relating to the Company’s foreign subsidiary, so that the Company could focus on growing its domestic based divisions. The board of directors authorized management to begin negotiations with interested parties to sell substantially all of the assets of Willtek or cease incurring costs related to its development (see Note 14). As a result of this decision, as well as additional circumstances surrounding the expected sale of Willtek in the second quarter of 2010, Willtek has met the required criterion with respect to discontinued operations. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the net assets of Willtek have been reflected as assets held for sale.Therefore, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Willtek have been included as assets and liabilities held for sale within the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the periods presented and further presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 15 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 16 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) Assets and liabilities held for sale consists of the following: operations within each of the three categories presented. Cash flows from discontinued operations are as follows: 235,457 — 691,814 977,119 Cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities 3,420,970 3,357,110 $6,978,163 $11,974,872 NOTE 3 — PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: Property, plant and equipment, consists of the following: For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 2008 $ 612,305 (153,317) $(365,114) $ 794,253 (265,884) $(192,598) Assets held for sale Accounts receivable — net Inventory — net Prepaid expenses and other current assets — net Property, plant and equipment — net Pension insurance and other long-term assets Liabilities held for sale Accounts payable Accrued expenses Pension liability Other long-term liabilities December 31, 2009 2008 $2,037,731 1,284,005 $ 3,804,227 3,144,602 $1,546,794 1,332,607 1,268,582 345,426 $ 2,897,599 1,414,521 1,204,350 — $4,493,409 $ 5,516,470 As a result of the expected sale of Willtek, the Company recorded a loss on sale of discontinued operations of $3,348,122, which represents the excess of net assets, and the related realization of other comprehensive income, over the net sales price. Such amount has been reflected as a reduction of assets held for sale in the aforementioned table. The fair market value of Willtek’s net assets was based upon a $1,550,000 net sales price which consisted of $2,750,000 purchase price less $1,200,000 in estimated closing costs. The following table summarizes the components of discontinued operations: Building and improvements Machinery and equipment Furniture and fixtures Transportation equipment Leasehold improvements Less: accumulated depreciation Add: land December 31, 2009 2008 $3,557,186 2,789,085 145,218 103,541 1,061,605 7,656,635 3,920,296 3,736,339 700,000 $3,557,186 2,744,413 140,466 140,693 992,055 7,574,813 3,416,754 4,158,059 700,000 $4,436,339 $4,858,059 Depreciation expense from continuing operations of $540,694 and $603,559 was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively. For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, NOTE 4 — OTHER ASSETS: 2009 2008 Other assets consist of the following: $25,860,848 $ 25,356,564 12,549,854 12,982,522 — 33,131,901 (73,961) 5,986 (79,947) (36,009,928) (4,897,673) (31,112,255) Product demo assets Building escrow reserve Miscellaneous Total December 31, 2009 $592,094 208,448 62,481 $863,023 2008 $363,734 198,976 51,041 $613,751 Net sales Gross profit Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets (Loss) from discontinued operations before taxes Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Loss) from discontinued operations (Loss) from sale of discontinued operations (3,348,122) — Net (loss) from discontinued operations $ (3,428,069) $(31,112,255) Cash flows from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are combined with the cash flows from Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 16 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 17 NOTE 5 — ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following: Payroll and related benefits Accrued taxes Accrued severance Warranty reserve Goods received not invoiced Professional fees Interest Commissions Other December 31, 2009 2008 $ 460,689 264,731 81,994 315,000 183,824 104,623 75,000 42,565 401,799 $ 242,103 257,000 — 75,000 222,446 122,809 — 35,148 363,427 Total $1,930,225 $1,317,933 NOTE 6 — MORTGAGE AND NOTE PAYABLE — LONG TERM: The Company has a mortgage payable secured by certain properties in the amount of $2,834,645.This note bears interest at an annual rate of 7.45%, requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $23,750 and matures in August 2013. and advisors of the Company who are expected to contribute to the Company’s future growth and success. 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options under the 2000 Plan. Prior to 2000, the Company had established an Incentive Stock Option Plan under which options to purchase up to 1,750,000 shares of common stock were available to be granted to officers and other key employees. On July 6, 2006, the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan, which authorizes the granting of options relating to an additional 2,000,000 shares of common stock, was approved by shareholder vote. On September 17, 2008, shareholders further approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan providing for an additional 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that may be available for future grants under the plan. All service-based options granted have 10-year terms and, from the date of grant, vest annually and become fully exercisable after a maximum of five years. Performance-based options granted have 10-year terms and vest and become fully exercisable when determinable performance targets are achieved. Performance targets are agreed to, and approved by, the Company’s board of directors. Maturities of mortgage principal payments for the next three years are $63,386, $68,347 and $73,697, respectively, with a balloon payment due in the fourth and final year of $2,629,215. Under the Company’s stock option plans, options may be granted to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at prices generally equal to the fair market value on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2009, Willtek has a bank loan in the amount of Euro 1,178,100 (U.S. $1,688,571) which bears interest at the annual rate of 4% and requires twelve semi-annual payments which began December 2008 until maturity at June 2014. This bank loan is not expected to be part of the sale of Willtek and accordingly the Company will continue to assume responsibility for repayment of this loan and therefore has excluded this note from liabilities held for sale. Maturities of scheduled bank loan principal payments are $375,238 annually for the next four years and $187,619 in the fifth and final year. NOTE 7 — OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: Other long-term liabilities consist of deferred rent relating to the Company’s building lease in Hanover Township, Parsippany, NJ which serves as its principal corporate headquarters and manufacturing plant. All other long-term liabilities, including the Company’s significant pension liability, have been reclassified and included in liabilities held for sale. NOTE 8 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: During 2000, the stockholders approved the Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant of Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) and Non-Qualified Stock Options (“NQSOs”) in compliance with the Code to employees, officers, directors, consultants On November 24, 2009, upon the unanimous recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors approved the grant of performance-based stock options to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Accordingly, the Company entered into stock option agreements dated as of November 24, 2009, pursuant to which the Company’s CEO was awarded options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.78 per share, representing a 5% premium over the closing price of the Company’s common stock reported on the NYSE Amex (formerly the American Stock Exchange) on November 24, 2009, the date of grant. On April 11, 2008, upon the unanimous recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors approved the grant of performance-based stock options to the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and then Senior Vice President of Global Customer Operations and Chief Marketing Officer (CMO). Accordingly, the Company entered into stock option agreements dated as of April 11, 2008, pursuant to which the Company’s CEO, CFO and CMO were awarded options to purchase up to 540,000, 220,000 and 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $1.42 per share, representing a 5% premium over the closing price of the Company’s common stock reported on the NYSE Amex (formerly the American Stock Exchange) on April 11, 2008, the date of grant. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 17 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 18 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) Due to the departure of the Company’s CEO and CMO during the third quarter of 2009, the 540,000 and 120,000 options awarded to them in April, 2008, respectively, were forfeited and are available for re- issuance. Under the terms of the stock option agreements, provided the executive remains in the continuous service of the Company at such times, the options will fully vest and become exercisable upon the earlier to occur of (a) the date on which the Board shall have determined that specific revenue and operating income targets have been met or (b) the date on which a “Change-of-Control” (as defined in the option agreements) of the Company is consummated, provided that all consideration in exchange therefore to which the executive may become entitled as a result of such Change-of-Control of the Company shall not be delivered to the executive until the earlier of (i) the date on which the executive’s employment with the Company is “Involuntarily Terminated” (as defined in the option agreements) following the consummation of such Change-of-Control or (ii) the date that is six months next following the date on which such Change-of-Control is consummated. The Company has not incurred expense relating to these performance-based options as it is more likely that not that the performance targets will not be achieved. A summary of service and performance-based stock option activity, and related information for the years ended December 31, follows: Outstanding, December 31, 2007 Granted Exercised Forfeited Canceled Outstanding, December 31, 2008 Granted Exercised Forfeited Canceled Options 2,668,987 880,000 — (22,500) (189,520) 3,336,967 500,000 — (1,528,000) — Outstanding, December 31, 2009 2,308,967 Options exercisable: December 31, 2008 December 31, 2009 1,698,884 1,337,467 Weighted Average Exercise Price 2.53 1.42 — 2.28 2.34 2.25 0.78 — 2.07 — 2.05 2.54 2.52 The options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows: Range of exercise prices Weighted average exercise price Options Options Outstanding Exercisable Weighted average remaining life $0.78 – $1.42 $1.69 – $2.25 $2.28 – $3.13 $0.97 $1.90 $2.62 720,000 184,000 1,404,967 — 9.1 years 2.4 years 5.1 years 184,000 1,153,467 2,308,967 1,337,467 As of December 31, 2009, the unearned compensation related to Company granted service-based incentive stock options is $252,369 which will continue to be amortized over the next two years. The fair value, and unamortized amount, of performance-based options granted by the Company as of December 31, 2009 is $430,360. This unearned compensation will not be recognized until the performance conditions described above are achieved. The fair value of performance-based options awarded during 2009 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and included the following range of assumptions; dividend yield of 0%, risk-free interest rate of 2.15%, and expected option lives of 4 years. Volatility assumption was 113%. The forfeiture rate was assumed to be 0%. For 2008, the fair value of options awarded was also estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and included the following range of assumptions; dividend yield of 0%, risk- free interest rate of 2.57%, and expected option lives of 4 years.Volatility assumption was 55%.The forfeiture rate was assumed to be 0%. The per share weighted average fair value of performance-based options granted in the years 2009 and 2008 were $0.58 and $0.63, respectively. NOTE 9 — OPERATIONAL INFORMATION AND EXPORT SALES: Sales: The Company and its subsidiaries develop and manufacture various types of electronic test equipment and are aggregated into a single operating segment based on similar economic characteristics, products, services, customers, U.S. Government regulatory requirements, manufacturing processes and distribution channels. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, no customer accounted for more than 7% and 3% of total sales, respectively. In addition to its in-house sales staff, the Company uses various manufacturers’ representatives to sell its products. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, no representative accounted for more than 10% of total sales. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 18 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 19 Regional Sales: in accordance with ASC 280, “Disclosures about The Company, Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”, has disclosed the following segment information: Revenues from continuing operations by Region For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2009 2008 Americas Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) Asia $15,633,581 5,072,513 2,122,234 $17,519,134 5,099,236 3,056,206 The funded status of the defined benefit plans is as follows: 2009 2008 Change in projected benefit obligation: Beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) Benefits paid and expenses Effect of foreign currency translation $1,579,273 15,342 95,064 (9,527) (81,485) 26,985 $2,001,817 20,665 91,961 (378,440) (87,748) (68,982) Projected benefit obligation at end of year $1,625,652 $1,579,273 $22,828,328 $25,674,576 Change in fair value of plan assets: Purchases In 2009 and 2008, no third-party supplier accounted for more than 6% and 7% of the Company’s total inventory purchases, respectively. NOTE 10 — RETIREMENT PLANS: The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering all eligible U.S. employees. Company contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 aggregated $313,298 and $345,945, respectively. The Company also maintains a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan covering 15 active and 30 former employees of its German subsidiary. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for its defined benefit pension plan. This plan has been frozen for approximately 14 years and covers certain employees of Willtek and all obligations of the plan are expected to transfer to the purchaser (see Note 14).The accumulated benefit obligation as of 2009 and 2008 was $1,589,629 and $1,535,972, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the pension liability of $1,268,582 and $1,204,350, respectively, was recorded in other long-term liabilities.There were no contributions made to this plan by the Company in 2008 and 2009 and there are no plans to make any contributions in 2010. The Company purchased life insurance to cover the actual net present value of the pension obligations. The cash surrender value of these insurance policies amounted to approximately $1,739,000 and $1,716,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amounts are independent of the defined benefit plan and do not constitute assets of the plan. Beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Settlement of capital Effect of foreign currency translation $ 374,922 11,123 (34,592) 5,616 $ 382,279 11,456 (8,155) (10,656) Fair value of plan assets at end of year Excess of projected benefit obligation over fair value of plan assets Unrecognized gain Accrued pension cost Required incremental asset Accrued pension cost at end of period $ 357,069 $ 374,924 2009 2008 $1,268,582 903,435 $1,204,350 986,536 $2,172,017 (903,435) $2,190,886 (986,536) $1,268,582 $1,204,350 The weighted average assumptions used to determine net pension cost and benefit obligations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows: 2009 5.70% Discount rate — benefit obligation 5.70% Discount rate — pension cost Expected long-term return on plan assets 3.00% Rate of compensation increase (Staff plan only) 1.50% 2008 6.25% 6.25% 3.00% 2.00% The following table presents the components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008: Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Recognized net actuarial (gain) 2009 2008 $ 15,342 95,064 (11,123) (101,325) $ 20,665 91,961 (11,456) (69,351) Net periodic pension (benefit) expense $ (2,042) $ 31,819 Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 19 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 20 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) The investment objectives for the pension plan’s assets are designed to generate returns that will enable the plan to meet its future obligation. The precise amounts for which this obligation will be settled depend on future events.The obligations are estimated using actuarial assumptions, based on the current economic environment. The pension plan’s investment strategies utilize fixed income insurance annuity investments to provide income and to preserve capital. Risks include, among others, the likelihood of the pension plan becoming under funded, thereby increasing the pension plan’s dependence on contributions of the Company. Professional advisors manage the pension plan’s assets and performance is evaluated by management and adjusted periodically based on market conditions. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, plan assets consisted of fixed income insurance annuities. The following benefit payments are expected to be paid as follows: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-2019 $ 104,019 106,584 108,820 111,922 117,942 681,216 As mentioned above, this defined benefit plan covers certain employees of the Company’s foreign subsidiary, Willtek, and is expected to transfer upon completion of its disposition. NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES: The components of income tax expense (benefit) related to income from continuing operations are as follows: Current: Federal State Deferred: Federal State Year Ended December 31, 2009 2008 $(2,351,789) 283,627 $ 831,864 84,183 (3,395,964) (902,725) (222,511) (59,149) $(6,366,851) $ 634,387 The following is a reconciliation of the maximum statutory federal tax rate to the Company’s effective tax relative to continuing operations: Year Ended December 31, 2009 % of Pre Tax Earnings (34.0)% (736.8) 39.6 11.9 17.0 2008 % of Pre Tax Earnings 34.0% 16.4 17.5 39.4 24.4 (702.3)% 131.7% Statutory federal income tax rate Investment in foreign subsidiary State income tax net of federal tax benefit Permanent differences Other The difference between the statutory and the effective tax rate is due mainly to the recognition of a loss on the outside basis in (2009), and advances to (2008), Willtek. The components of deferred income taxes are as follows: Deferred tax assets: Uniform capitalization of inventory costs for tax purposes Allowances for doubtful accounts Accruals Tax effect of goodwill Book depreciation over tax Net operating loss carryforward Investment in foreign subsidiary Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets December 31, 2009 2008 $ 185,322 $ 62,069 216,800 (13,524) (7,644) 18,572,869 178,381 40,554 10,000 89,180 (30,720) 7,384,560 — 7,900,000 19,015,892 15,571,955 (13,991,388) (14,846,140) $ 5,024,504 $ 725,815 The Company has a domestic net operating loss carryforward at December 31, 2009 of approximately $29,000,000 which expires in 2029. The Company also has a foreign net operating loss carryforward at December 31, 2009 of approximately $23,400,000 which has no expiration. As a result of the expected disposition of the assets of Willtek (see Note 2), the Company will be in a position to benefit from a tax deduction on its 2009 tax return equal to its outside basis in its investment in, and advances to, Willtek. Accordingly, the Company realized a tax benefit, net of valuation allowance, of approximately $6,400,000 in 2009. Earnings per share of $0.21 from continuing operations in 2009, includes $0.25 per share relating to this tax benefit. Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 20 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 21 Realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating sufficient taxable income in the appropriate tax jurisdictions in future years to obtain benefit from the reversal of net deductible temporary differences and from utilization of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty related to the realization of certain deferred tax assets existing at December 31, 2009.The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable income are changed. Management believes that is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances as of December 31, 2009. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. (federal and various states), German and French taxing jurisdictions.With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations in its major tax jurisdictions for periods before 2005. The Company is no longer subject to tax examinations in Germany and France for periods before 2005. The Company does not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits and does not anticipate significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. Amounts recognized for income tax related interest and penalties as a component of the provision for income taxes are immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: Warranties: The Company provides one-year warranties on all of its products covering both parts and labor. The Company, at its option, repairs or replaces products that are defective during the warranty period if the proper preventive maintenance procedures have been followed by its customers. The costs related to these warranties are not certain however, based upon past experience, these costs have been minimal. Leases: The Company leases a 45,700 square foot facility located in Hanover Township, Parsippany, New Jersey, which is currently being used as its principal corporate headquarters and manufacturing plant.The term of the lease agreement is for ten years beginning on October 1, 2001 and ending September 30, 2011 and can be renewed for one five-year period at fair market value to be determined at term expiration. Additionally, the Company leases a 36,000 square foot facility located in Ismaning, Germany, which is currently being used as Willtek’s headquarters and manufacturing plant. The lease terminates on December 31, 2010 and can be renewed for two five-year periods twelve months prior to the end of the expiring term. Due to current circumstances regarding the Willtek operation, the Company does not intend to renew this lease upon expiration. The Company is also responsible for its proportionate share of the cost of utilities, repairs, taxes, and insurance. The future minimum lease payments relative to continuing operations are shown below: 2010 2011 $502,700 335,133 $837,833 Rent expense included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $533,905 and $548,433, respectively. Rent expense relating to Willtek for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $850,939 and $896,913, respectively, and has been included in discontinued operations. The Company owns a 44,000 square foot facility located in Mahwah, New Jersey which is leased to an unrelated third party.This lease, which terminates in 2013, provides for annual rental income of $385,991 throughout the lease term. The current tenant has an exclusive option to purchase the property, at a predetermined purchase price of approximately $3,500,000, up through August 1, 2012. The Company leases certain equipment under operating lease arrangements. These operating leases expire in various years through 2012. All leases may be renewed at the end of their respective leasing periods. Future payments relative to continuing operations consist of the following at December 31, 2009: 2010 2011 2012 $ 74,812 74,563 36,658 $186,033 Environmental Contingencies: Following an investigation by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) in 1982, of the waste disposal practices at a certain site formerly leased by Boonton, the Company put a ground water management plan into effect as approved by the NJDEP. Costs associated with this site are charged directly to income as incurred. The owner of this site has notified the Company that if the NJDEP investigation proves to have interfered with a sale of the property, the owner may seek to hold the Company liable for any loss it suffers as a result. However, corporate counsel has informed management that, in their opinion, the owner would not prevail in any lawsuit filed due to the imposition by law of the statute of limitations. Costs charged to operations in connection with the water management plan amounted to approximately $70,000 and $19,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Costs were higher in 2009 due to changes in NJDEP regulations which required additional Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 21 Quarter 1st $6,767 3,275 2nd $6,569 3,220 3rd $6,689 3,093 4th $5,650 2,397 2008 Net sales Gross profit Operating income (loss) 423 206 (94) (258) Net income (loss) from continuing operations Diluted net income (loss) per share from continuing operations 350 309 (344) (466) $.01 $.01 $(.01) $.(.02) NOTE 14 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT: On April 09, 2010, the Company executed an agreement to sell substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Willtek Communications GmbH (Willtek), the Company’s foreign subsidiary located in Ismaning, Germany, for the cash purchase price of $2,750,000. Under the terms of the agreement, the purchaser would retain all of the employees of Willtek and all other assets of Willtek, except for any cash balances at the date of closing and specifically identified notes receivable balances. Additionally, the purchaser agrees to retain all of the liabilities of Willtek, except for, a bank note payable and accrued foreign income taxes. The sale is expected to be completed during the Company’s second quarter of 2010. 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 22 tests to be performed by the Company.The Company will continue to be liable under the plan, in all future years, until such time as the NJDEP releases it from all obligations applicable thereto. Risks and Uncertainties: The Company is subject to contingent liabilities for employee notice and severance payments for any actions taken by management to restructure or reduce employees in Germany, the United States or other worldwide locations. These payments could have a significantly negative impact on the Company’s cash flow and results of operations. Line of Credit: In September 2009, the Company secured a line of credit with its investment bank.The credit facility provides borrowing availability of up to 100% of the Company’s money market account balance and 99% of the Company’s short-term investment securities (U.S.Treasury bills) and, under the terms and conditions of the loan agreement, is fully secured by said money fund account and short-term investment holdings. Advances under the facility will bear interest at a variable rate equal to the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) in effect at time of borrowing. Additionally, under the terms and conditions of the loan agreement, there is no annual fee and any amount outstanding under the loan facility may be paid at any time in whole or in part without penalty. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the facility and approximately $6,400,000 of borrowing availability. The Company has no current plans to borrow from this credit facility as it believes cash generated from operations will adequately meet near-term working capital requirements. NOTE 13 — SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED): The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial data from continuing operations (in thousands, except per share amounts). Quarter 2009 1st 2nd $5,528 Net sales Gross profit 2,626 Operating (loss) (196) Net income $5,156 2,223 (619) 3rd $6,240 2,929 (62) 4th $5,905 2,851 (35) (loss) from continuing operations Diluted net (223) (198) (18) 5,912 income (loss) per share from continuing operations $(.01) $(.01) $(.00) $.23 Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 22 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 23 REPORT OF Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. Parsippany, NJ We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, cash flows and the schedule listed in the accompanying index for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and the schedule are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and the schedule. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and the schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. /s/ PKF Certified Public Accountants A Professional Corporation April 14, 2010 New York, New York Wireless Telecom Group 2009 Annual Report Page 23 03_61451_Wireless_AR 5/5/10 3:02 PM Page 24 Boonton’s Peak Power Meters… The Future of Amplifier Testing. In the past, your options were using one- or two-tone test signals to measure amplifier linearity. Today, Boonton al- lows you to use your signal to characterize your DUT. No more extrapolating graphs or guessing likely compres- sion points. Our family of peak power meters offers pow- erful statistical analysis tools, and is joined by the fastest and widest dynamic range sensors in the industry. If you measure extreme signals with: • High peak to average ratio • Ultra-low duty cycle • Noise-like communication signals Boonton delivers the fastest and most comprehensive results in the industry. For more information visit us at boonton.com or call +1 973-386-9696 A Unique Solution for RADAR Testing To accurately measure fast rise times and low duty cycle pulses, the Boonton 4500B is the Peak Power meter of choice. Our instruments deliver true <5 ns rise time, 70 MHz video BW, and programmable triggers that allow the user to capture each pulse for in-depth analysis. The Noisecom UFX7000A series instruments can be configured as RADAR interference simulators including, multiple noise sources, switchable filter pathways, and TTL controlled burst noise that emulate real world noise and interference. Air to air multifunction Battlefield Missile guidance Air traffic control Bands: L, S, C, X, Ku , K, & Ka Contact Wireless Telecom Group with your measurement requirements. 973 386 9696 | wtcom.com Corporate Profile Annual Meeting The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday June 8th, 2010 at: Sheraton Parsippany Hotel 199 Smith Road Parsippany, NJ 07054 A copy of the Form 10-K Report as filed with the Securities and Ex- change Commission may be obtained by written request addressed to: Robert Censullo, Secretary Wireless Telecom Group, Inc. 25 Eastmans Road Parsippany, NJ 07054 USA Phone: (973) 386-9696 Fax: (973) 386-9191 Website: wtcom.com Email: investor@wtcom.com Directors Henry Bachman Hazem Ben-Gacem Joseph Garrity Paul Genova Glenn Luk Rick Mace Adrian Nemcek - Chairman of the Board Officers Paul Genova Chief Executive Officer & CFO Transfer Agent and Registrar American Stock Transfer & Trust Company Independent Accountants PKF Certified Public Accountants A Professional Corporation Legal Counsel Greenberg Traurig, LLP Exchange Listing NYSE-Amex Symbol: WTT 25 Eastmans Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054 Tel 973 386 9696 Fax 973 386 9191 wtcom.com
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above