Table of Contents
(Mark One)
x
☐
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 000-20827
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Missouri
43-1265338
12444 Powerscourt Drive, Suite 550, St. Louis, Missouri 63131
(314) 506-5500
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(Telephone Number, incl. area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Trading Symbol
CASS
Name of each exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Global Select Market
Title of each Class
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No x
Yes ☐ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes x No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an
emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer: ☐ Accelerated filer: x Non-accelerated filer: ☐ Smaller reporting company: ☐ Emerging
growth company: ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new
or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control
over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or
issued its audit report. x
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the
filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received
by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $520.7 million based on the closing price of
the common stock of $33.80 on June 30, 2022, as reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of February 15, 2023, the Registrant had 13,710,353
shares outstanding of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required for Part III of this report is incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
Auditor Name: KPMG LLP Auditor Location: St. Louis, MO Auditor Firm ID: 185
Table of Contents
PART I.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
PART III.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
PART IV.
Item 15.
Item 16.
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BUSINESS
RISK FACTORS
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
PROPERTIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
RESERVED
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
OTHER INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
FORM 10-K SUMMARY
SIGNATURES
1
10
17
17
18
18
19
20
20
35
37
76
76
78
78
79
79
79
80
80
81
81
82
Forward-looking Statements - Factors That May Affect Future Results
This report may contain or incorporate by reference forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Although we believe that, in making any such
statements, our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks,
uncertainties, and other factors beyond our control, which may cause future performance to be materially different from expected performance summarized
in the forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors are discussed in the section Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” We undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
events, or changes to future results over time.
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Description of Business
PART I.
Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“Cass” or the “Company”) provides payment and information processing services to large manufacturing, distribution and
retail enterprises across the United States. The Company’s services include freight invoice rating, payment processing, auditing, and the generation of
accounting and transportation information. Cass also processes and pays facility-related invoices, which include electricity and gas as well as waste and
telecommunications expenses, and is a provider of telecom expense management solutions. Cass solutions include integrated payments, a B2B payment
platform for clients that require an agile fintech partner. Additionally, the Company offers a church management software solution and an on-line platform
to provide generosity services for faith-based and non-profit organizations. The Company’s bank subsidiary, Cass Commercial Bank (the “Bank”), supports
the Company’s payment operations. The Bank also provides banking services to its target markets, which include privately held businesses in the St. Louis
metropolitan area and restaurant franchises and faith-based ministries within the United States.
Company Strategy and Core Competencies
Cass is an information services company with a primary focus on processing payables and payables-related transactions for large corporations located in
the United States. Cass possesses four core competencies that encompass most of its processing services.
Data acquisition – This refers to the gathering of data elements from diverse, heterogeneous sources and the building of complete databases for our
customers. Data is the raw material of the information economy. Cass gathers vital data from complex and diverse input documents, electronic media,
proprietary databases and data feeds, including data acquired from vendor invoices as well as customer procurement and sales systems. Through its
numerous methods of obtaining streams and pieces of raw data, Cass is able to assemble vital data into centralized data management systems and
warehouses, thus producing an engine to create the power of information for managing critical corporate functions and processing systems.
Data management – Once data is assembled, Cass is able to utilize the power from derived information to produce significant savings and benefits for its
clients. This information is integrated into customers’ unique financial and accounting systems, eliminating the need for internal accounting processing and
providing internal and external support for these critical systems. Information is also used to produce management and exception reporting for operational
control, feedback, planning assistance and performance measurement.
Business Intelligence – Receiving information in the right place at the right time and in the required format is paramount for business survival. Cass’
information delivery solutions provide reports, digital images, data files and retrieval capabilities through the internet or directly into customer internal
systems. Cass’ proprietary internet management delivery system is the foundation for driving these critical functions. Transaction, operational, control,
status and processing exception information are all delivered through this system creating an efficient, accessible and highly reliable asset for Cass
customers.
Financial exchange – Since Cass is unique among its competition in that it owns a commercial bank, it is also able to manage the movement of funds from
its customers to their suppliers. This is a distinguishing factor, which clearly requires the processing capability, operating systems and financial integrity of
a banking organization. Cass provides immediate, accurate, controlled and protected funds management and transfer system capabilities for all of its
customers. Old and costly check processing and delivery mechanisms are replaced with more efficient electronic cash management and funds transfer
systems.
Cass’ core competencies allow it to perform the highest volumes of transaction processing in an integrated, efficient and systematic approach. Not only is
Cass able to process the transaction, it is also able to collect the data defining the transaction and effect the financial payment governing its terms.
These core competencies, enhanced through shared business processes, drive Cass’ strategic business units. Building upon these foundations, Cass
continues to explore new business opportunities that leverage these competencies and processes.
1
Table of Contents
Marketing, Customers and Competition
The Company, through its Transportation Information Services business unit, is one of the largest firms in the transportation bill processing and payment
industry in the United States based on the total dollars of transportation bills paid and items processed. Competition consists of a few primary competitors
and numerous small transportation bill audit firms located throughout the United States. While offering transportation payment services, few of these audit
firms compete on a national basis. These competitors compete mainly on price, functionality and service levels. The Company, through its Expense
Management business unit, also competes with other companies located throughout the United States that pay energy and waste bills and provide
management reporting. Available data indicates that the Company is one of the largest providers of energy information processing and payment services.
Cass is unique among these competitors in that it is not exclusively affiliated with any one energy service provider (“ESP”). Various ESPs market the
Company’s services, adding value with their unique auditing, consulting and technological capabilities. Many of Cass’ services are customized for the
ESPs, providing a full-featured solution without any development costs to the ESP. The Company, through its Telecom Information Services business unit,
is a leader in the growing telecom expense management market and competes with other companies located throughout the United States in this market.
The Company, through its Waste Expense Management business competes against small expense management companies along with large national account
programs of major haulers. The Company division known as TouchPoint offers a church management software solution and an on-line platform to provide
generosity services for faith-based and non-profit organizations, which is a complementary service offering to the Bank’s faith-based customers. Also, the
Company, through its CassPay operation, competes with providers of corporate payment solutions.
The Bank is organized as a Missouri trust company with banking powers and was founded in 1906. The Company was originally classified as a bank
holding corporation due to its ownership of a federally-insured commercial bank and was originally organized in 1982 as Cass Commercial Corporation
under the laws of Missouri. Approval by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System was received in February 1983. The Company changed its
name to Cass Information Systems, Inc. in January 2001. In December 2011, the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of St. Louis approved the election of Cass
Information Systems, Inc. to become a financial holding company. As a financial holding company, Cass may engage in activities that are financial in
nature or incidental to a financial activity. The Bank encounters competition from numerous banks and financial institutions located throughout the St.
Louis, Missouri metropolitan area and other areas in which the Bank competes. The Bank’s principal competitors, however, are large bank holding
companies that are able to offer a wide range of banking and related services through extensive branch networks. The Bank targets its services to privately
held businesses, restaurant franchises, and faith-based ministries located in St. Louis, Missouri and other selected cities located throughout the United
States.
The Company holds several trademarks for the payment and rating services it provides. These include: FreightPay®, Transdata®, Ratemaker®, Best
Rate®, Rate Exchange®, CassPort®, Cass Freight Index®, Cass Truckload Linehaul Index®, Cass Intermodal Price Index® Expense$mart®,
ExpenseSmart®, TouchPoint®, Gyve®, Generosity Made Simple®, WasteVision™ and Direct2Carrier Payments™. The Company holds patents for
methods and systems for managing employee-liable expenses and methods and systems for communicating expense management information.
The Company and its subsidiaries have a varied client base and are not dependent on any one customer or group of customers for a significant portion of its
business.
Employees and Human Capital Resources
The Company and its subsidiaries had 940 full-time and 269 part-time employees as of February 15, 2023. Of these employees, the Bank had 70 full-time
and no part-time employees.
Cass has long been committed to comprehensive and competitive compensation and benefits programs to attract and retain talent in a competitive
environment. Retention of skilled and highly trained employees is critical as the Company’s future operating results depend substantially upon the
continued service of executive officers and key personnel. Furthering the philosophy to attract and retain a pool of talented and motivated employees who
will continue to advance the Company’s purpose and contribute to overall success, compensation and benefits programs include: a noncontributory profit
sharing program for most employees; a defined contribution 401(k) plan to provide retirement benefits to eligible employees; a performance-based equity
compensation program for executive officers and key personnel; and incentive programs for loan and sales personnel. Cass also provides comprehensive
health, dental, and vision plans to most employees, as well as free employee assistance programs to all employees and members of their families.
2
Table of Contents
The Company invests in employees’ future by assisting with tuition reimbursement for continued education throughout the Company’s employee ranks.
Employees are also able to participate in educational seminars run by outside parties to maintain and expand professional knowledge.
In order to develop a workforce that aligns with the Company’s corporate values, regularly sponsored campaigns and events occur, such as charitable
workplace campaigns, food drives to assist local food banks, and toy drives to support charities during the holidays. Additionally, the Company supports a
number of organizations with annual financial contributions.
The Company recognizes the benefits of building a corporate culture that promotes diversity, equity and inclusion ("DEI") to foster unique ideas and ways
of thinking. In pursuit of the Company's overall DEI mission, Cass focuses on: a) cultivating an environment that encourages collaboration, flexibility and
fairness to enable all employees to contribute to their full potential; b) promoting diversity in our talent management and succession planning processes and
employee development programs; and c) ensuring leadership commitment in facilitating the Company's DEI efforts.
In January 2022, the Company created a DEI Committee. The DEI Committee was formed after a thorough process of determining a charter and is actively
in the process of expanding the Company's DEI vision. The committee members are passionate about DEI efforts and represent the Company's various
business divisions and corporate departments. The Company continues to promote DEI within its culture and make improvements to human resources
programs to support related initiatives. As of December 31, 2022, 70% of the Company's U.S. employees were female, and 23% were ethnically diverse.
Within the management group, 47% were female, and 16% were ethnically diverse. Over the past year, the Company has continued to support and provide
diversity training to all employees. The Company continues its commitment to providing a workplace that is free of harassment and discrimination by
taking proactive measures and providing all employees with non-discrimination and sexual harassment prevention training on an annual basis. The DEI
initiatives will continue to be supported and promoted to provide all employees a place where they feel welcomed, appreciated and valued.
Equal opportunities, anti-harassment, non-discrimination, the health and safety of employees and work-life balance are actively promoted as more fully
described in the Company's Environmental, Social, and Governance report.
Supervision and Regulation
The Company and its bank subsidiary are extensively regulated under federal and state law. These laws and regulations are intended to primarily protect
depositors, not shareholders. The Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the Missouri Division of Finance, the FRB and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Company is a financial holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended (the “BHC Act”), and as such, it is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the FRB. Significant elements of the laws and
regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank are described below. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
statutes, regulations and policies that are described. Also, such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress and state
legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries
could have a material effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Bank Holding Company Activities – In general, the BHC Act limits the business of bank holding companies to banking, managing or controlling banks and
other related activities. In addition, bank holding companies that qualify and elect to be financial holding companies, such as the Company, may engage in
any activity, or acquire and retain the shares of a company engaged in any activity, that is either (i) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity
or (ii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial
system generally. Such permitted activities include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments.
To maintain financial holding company status, a financial holding company and all of its depository institution subsidiaries must be “well capitalized” and
“well managed.” A depository institution subsidiary is considered to be “well capitalized” if it satisfies the requirements for this status discussed in the
section “Prompt Corrective Action” below. A depository institution subsidiary is considered “well managed” if it received a composite rating and
management rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination. A financial holding company’s status will also depend upon it maintaining its
status as “well capitalized” and “well managed’ under applicable FRB regulations. If a financial holding company ceases to meet these capital and
management requirements, the FRB may impose limitations or conditions on the conduct of its
3
Table of Contents
activities during the non-compliance period, and the company may not commence any of the broader financial activities permissible for financial holding
companies or acquire a company engaged in such financial activities without prior approval of the FRB. If the company does not return to compliance
within 180 days, the FRB may require divestiture of the holding company’s depository institutions.
In order for a financial holding company to commence any new activity permitted by the BHC Act or to acquire a company engaged in any new activity
permitted by the BHC Act, each insured depository institution subsidiary of the financial holding company must have received a rating of at least
“satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the Community Reinvestment Act. See “Community Reinvestment Act” below.
The FRB has the power to order any bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity or to terminate its ownership or control of any
subsidiary when the FRB has reasonable grounds to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the
financial soundness, safety or stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.
The BHC Act, the Bank Merger Act, and other federal and state statutes regulate acquisitions of banks and banking companies. The BHC Act requires the
prior approval of the FRB for the direct or indirect acquisition by the Company of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of a
bank or bank holding company. Under the Bank Merger Act, the prior approval of the FRB or other appropriate bank regulatory authority is required for
the Bank to merge with another bank or purchase the assets or assume the deposits of another bank. In reviewing acquisition applications, the bank
regulatory authorities will consider, among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transactions, the capital position of the combined
organization, the risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system, the applicant’s performance record under the Community Reinvestment Act
and its compliance with fair housing laws.
The Dodd-Frank Act – The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), enacted in July 2010, significantly
restructured the financial regulatory environment in the United States, affecting all bank holding companies and banks, including the Company and the
Bank, some of which are described in more detail below. The impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the Company and the Bank has been substantial.
Dividends and Stock Repurchases – Both the Company and the Bank are subject to various regulations that restrict their ability to pay dividends and the
amount of dividends that they may pay. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, a depository institution, such as the
Bank, may not pay dividends if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized or if it is already undercapitalized. The payment of dividends by the
Company and the Bank may also be affected or limited by other factors, such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital and, under certain
circumstances, the ability of federal regulators to prohibit dividend payments as an unsound or unsafe practice.
From time to time, the Company's Board of Directors has authorized stock repurchase plans. Bank holding companies must consult with the Federal
Reserve before redeeming any equity or other capital instrument included in tier 1 or tier 2 capital prior to stated maturity, if such redemption could have a
material effect on the level or composition of the organization’s capital base. In addition, a bank holding company is unable to repurchase shares equal to
10% or more of its net worth if it would not be well-capitalized (as defined by the Federal Reserve) after giving effect to such repurchase. Bank holding
companies experiencing financial weaknesses, or that are at significant risk of developing financial weaknesses, must consult with the Federal Reserve
before redeeming or repurchasing common stock or other regulatory capital instruments.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Inflation Reduction Act") was enacted. Among other things, the Inflation Reduction Act imposes
a new 1% excise tax on the fair market value of stock repurchased after December 31, 2022 by publicly traded U.S. corporations. With certain exceptions,
the value of stock repurchased is determined net of stock issued in the year, including shares issued pursuant to compensatory arrangements.
Capital Requirements – As a bank holding company, the Company and the Bank are subject to capital requirements pursuant to the FRB’s capital
guidelines which include (i) risk-based capital guidelines, which are designed to make capital requirements more sensitive to various risk profiles and
account for off-balance sheet exposure; (ii) guidelines that consider market risk, which is the risk of loss due to change in value of assets and liabilities due
to changes in interest rates; and (iii) guidelines that use a leverage ratio which places a constraint on the maximum degree of risk to which a financial
holding company may leverage its equity capital base.
The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to maintain the following:
4
Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (resulting in a
minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%);
a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (resulting in a minimum Tier 1
capital ratio of 8.5%);
a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation
buffer (resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%); and
a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average consolidated assets.
The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of common equity Tier 1
capital to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face limitations on the payment of dividends, common stock
repurchases and discretionary cash payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall.
Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common
equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital generally includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus
and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional
Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus meeting specified requirements. Also included in
Tier 2 capital is the allowance for credit losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for non-advanced approaches institutions like
Cass that have exercised a one-time opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net
unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values.
The calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations. For instance, the Basel III Capital
Rules and the Capital Simplification Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to common equity Tier 1 capital. These include, for
example, the requirement that certain deferred tax assets and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from Tier 1 capital
to the extent that any one such category exceeds 25% of common equity Tier 1 capital.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets,
are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are
required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk
weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to
commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans, and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to
permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.
The FRB has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is
or may become inadequate in light of the particular risks or circumstances. As of December 31, 2022, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy
requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules.
In December 2017, the Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (commonly
referred to as “Basel IV”). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee's standardized approach for credit risk (including by
recalibrating risk weights and introducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines
of credit) and provides a new standardized approach for operational risk capital. Under the Basel framework, these standards went into effect on January 1,
2023, with an aggregate output floor phasing in through January 1, 2027. Under the current U.S. capital rules, operational risk capital requirements and a
capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company or the Bank. The impact of Basel IV on the Company will depend on
the manner in which it is implemented by the federal bank regulators.
Source of Strength Doctrine – FRB and other regulations require bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their
subsidiary banks. Under this requirement, the Company is expected to commit resources to support the Bank. Any capital loans by a bank holding company
to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a
bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a
subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.
5
Table of Contents
Deposit Insurance – Substantially all of the deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC,
and the Bank is subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. Deposit insurance assessments are based on average consolidated total assets
minus average tangible equity. Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as the Bank,
are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital level, and certain other factors, with less risky institutions
paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned and certain other factors.
FDIC insurance expense totaled $415,700, $300,200 and $152,500 for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points
beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The increased assessment is expected to improve the likelihood that the DIF reserve ratio
would reach the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline prescribed under the FDIC's amended restoration plan.
The FDIC may terminate deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.
Prompt Corrective Action – The Basel III Capital Rules incorporate new requirements into the prompt correction action framework, described above. The
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (“FDIA”) requires that federal banking agencies take “prompt corrective action” against depository institutions that do not
meet minimum capital requirements and includes the following five capital tiers: “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,”
“significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare
with various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation.
A depository institution is deemed to be (i) “well-capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of 8% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater and is not subject to any regulatory order
agreement or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if the institution has a total
risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4% or greater, a common equity Tier 1 ratio of
4.5% or greater and does not meet the definition of “well capitalized”; (iii) “undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less
than 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, a leverage ratio of less than 4% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%; (iv)
“significantly undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%, a
leverage ratio of less than 3% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3%; and (v) “critically undercapitalized” if the institution has a ratio of tangible
equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2%. An institution may be deemed to be in a capital category that is lower
than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with
respect to certain matters. A bank’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital
category may not constitute an accurate representation of the bank’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.
Subject to a narrow exception, a receiver or conservator is required to be appointed for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized” within specified
time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the FRB within 45 days of the date an institution is deemed to
have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Compliance with the plan must be
guaranteed by any parent holding company up to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s total assets when it was deemed to be undercapitalized or the amount
necessary to achieve compliance with applicable capital requirements. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately
applicable to an undercapitalized institution including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital
distributions and expansion. The FRB could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive
and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly and critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory
and discretionary measures.
As of December 31, 2022, the most recent notification from the regulatory agencies categorized the Company and the Bank as well-capitalized. For further
information regarding the capital ratios and leverage ratio of the Company and the Bank, see Item 8, Note 2 of this report.
6
Table of Contents
Safety and Soundness Regulations – In accordance with the FDIA, the federal banking agencies adopted guidelines establishing general standards relating
to internal controls, information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, asset
quality, earnings, compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require that institutions maintain appropriate systems and practices to identify
and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and
describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer,
employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, regulations adopted by the federal banking agencies authorize the agencies to require that an
institution that has been given notice that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If the institution fails
to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted compliance plan, the agency must issue an order
directing corrective actions and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an undercapitalized institution is subject under the “prompt
corrective action” provisions of FDIA. If the institution fails to comply with such an order, the agency may seek to enforce such order in judicial
proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.
Loans-to-One-Borrower – The Bank generally may not make loans or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of
unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be loaned, up to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily
marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank was in compliance with the loans-to-one-borrower
limitations.
Depositor Preference – The FDIA provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, the claims of
depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC
as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured
depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, non-deposit creditors, including depositors whose deposits are payable
only outside of the United States and the parent bank holding company, with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository
institution.
Community Reinvestment Act – The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”) requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the credit needs of
their market areas consistent with safe and sound banking practice. Under the CRA, each depository institution is required to help meet the credit needs of
its market areas by, among other things, providing credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and communities. Depository institutions are
periodically examined for compliance with the CRA and are assigned ratings that must be publicly disclosed. In order for a financial holding company to
commence any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, or to acquire any company engaged in any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, each insured
depository institution subsidiary of the financial holding company must have received a rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under
the CRA. The Bank received a rating of “satisfactory” in its most recent CRA exam.
On May 5, 2022, federal banking regulators requested comment on a joint notice of proposed rulemaking intended to strengthen and modernize the CRA
regulations and framework. Until the proposed rulemaking is final and effective, the Company and the Bank will continue to operate under the CRA
regulations currently in effect. At this time, it is uncertain what effect the impending CRA regulations will have on the Company and the Bank with respect
to their CRA activities.
Financial Privacy – Banks and other financial institutions are subject to regulations that limit their ability to disclose non-public information about
consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and affect how consumer information is
transmitted through diversified financial companies and conveyed to outside vendors.
The Bank is also subject to regulatory guidelines establishing standards for safeguarding customer information and maintaining information security
programs. The standards set forth in the guidelines are intended to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect
against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or
information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.
Transactions with Affiliates – Transactions between the Bank and its affiliates are subject to regulations that limit the types and amounts of covered
transactions engaged in by the Bank and generally require those transactions to be on an arm’s-length basis. The term “affiliate” is defined to mean any
company that controls or is under common control with the Bank and includes the Company and its non-bank subsidiaries. “Covered transactions” include
a loan or extension of credit, as
7
Table of Contents
well as a purchase of securities issued by an affiliate, certain purchases of assets from the affiliate, certain derivative transactions that create a credit
exposure to an affiliate, the acceptance of securities issued by the affiliate as collateral for a loan, and the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of
credit on behalf of an affiliate. In general, these regulations require that any such transaction by the Bank (or its subsidiaries) with an affiliate must be
secured by designated amounts of specified collateral and must be limited to certain thresholds on an individual and aggregate basis.
Federal law also limits the Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders, as well as to entities controlled by
such persons. Among other things, extensions of credit to insiders are required to be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit
underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons. Also, the terms of such
extensions of credit may not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features and may not exceed certain limitations
on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of the Bank’s capital.
Cybersecurity – Federal regulators regularly issue new and updated guidance and standards regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk
management among financial institutions and public companies generally. Financial institutions are expected to comply with such guidance and standards
and develop appropriate risk management processes and security controls. If the Company fails to observe the regulatory guidance, it could be subject to
various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.
Recently, the federal banking agencies adopted a final rule requiring banking organizations to notify their primary banking regulator within 36 hours of
determining that a “computer-security incident” has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the banking
organization’s ability to carry out banking operations or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, its businesses and
operations that would result in material loss, or its operations that would impact the stability of the United States. Banking organizations are also required
to notify each affected customer as soon as possible in the event of an incident that results in actual or potential harm to the integrity or availability of
information and systems or that violates or threatens to violate the organization’s security for four or more hours.
Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks, including litigation and enforcement risks, are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due
to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of internet banking, mobile banking and other
technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for a further discussion of risks related to
cybersecurity.
Bank Secrecy Act/Anti Money Laundering Regulation, USA PATRIOT Act and National Defense Authorization Act - The Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA"), the
USA PATRIOT Act and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain an effective Anti Money
Laundering ("AML") program and to file timely reports such as suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports. The Company is required to
comply with these and other AML requirements. The federal banking agencies and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) are authorized
to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and have recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts against banks
and other financial services providers with the Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service. The Company is
also subject to increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
The USA PATRIOT Act gives federal agencies additional powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures, expanded
surveillance powers, increased information sharing, and broadened AML requirements. The USA PATRIOT Act mandates that financial service companies
implement additional policies and procedures and take heightened measures designed to address any or all of the following matters: customer identification
programs, money laundering, terrorist financing, identifying and reporting suspicious activities and currency transactions, currency crimes, and cooperation
between financial institutions and law enforcement authorities.
On January 1, 2021, Congress enacted the National Defense Authorization Act, which enacted the most significant overhaul of the BSA and related AML
laws since the USA PATRIOT Act. Notable amendments include (i) significant changes to the collection of beneficial ownership information and the
establishment of a beneficial ownership registry, which requires corporate entities (generally, any corporation, limited liability company or other similar
entity with 20 or fewer employees and annual gross income of $5 million or less) to report beneficial ownership information to FinCEN (which information
will be maintained by FinCEN and made available upon request to financial institutions); (ii) enhanced whistleblower provisions, which provide that one or
more whistleblowers who voluntarily provide original information
8
Table of Contents
leading to the successful enforcement of violations of the AML laws in any judicial or administrative action brought by the Secretary of the Treasury or the
Attorney General resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million (including disgorgement and interest but excluding forfeiture, restitution, or
compensation to victims) will receive not more than 30 percent of the monetary sanctions collected and will receive increased protections; (iii) increased
penalties for violations of the BSA; (iv) improvements to existing information sharing provisions that permit financial institutions to share information
relating to suspicious activity reports with foreign branches, subsidiaries, and affiliates (except those located in China, Russia, or certain other jurisdictions)
for the purpose of combating illicit finance risks; and (v) expanded duties and powers of FinCEN. Many of the requirements included in the AML
amendments will require additional rulemakings, reports and other measures, and the impact of these rules will depend on, among other things, rulemaking
and implementation guidance. On December 8, 2021, FinCEN issued proposed regulations that would implement the amendments regarding beneficial
ownership if adopted as proposed.
Other Regulations – The operations of the Company and the Bank are also subject to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the provision of consumer information to credit reporting agencies and the use of consumer information;
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
Electronic Funds Transfer Act, governing automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising
from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real estate receive various
disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that
increase the cost of settlement services;
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies
made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check.
Certain of these laws are consumer protection laws that extensively govern the Company’s relationship with its customers. Violations of applicable
consumer protection laws can result in significant potential liability from litigation brought by customers, including actual damages, restitution and
attorneys’ fees. Federal bank regulators, state attorneys general and state and local consumer protection agencies may also seek to enforce consumer
protection requirements and obtain these and other remedies, including regulatory sanctions, customer rescission rights, action by the state and local
attorneys general in each jurisdiction in which the Company operates and civil money penalties. Failure to comply with consumer protection requirements
may also result in the Company’s inability to pursue merger or acquisition transactions.
Website Availability of SEC Reports
Cass files annual, quarterly and current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Cass will, as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, make available free of charge on its website each of its Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, all amendments to those reports, and its definitive proxy statements. The address of Cass’
website is: www.cassinfo.com.
The reference to the Company’s website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website and should not
be considered part of this report.
Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies
For the statistical disclosure by bank holding companies, refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
9
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
This section highlights specific risks that could affect the Company’s business. Although this section attempts to highlight key factors, please be aware that
other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time, and Cass cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which
they may affect the Company’s financial performance. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this report, the
identified risks that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following:
Economic and Market Conditions Risk
General political, economic or industry conditions may be less favorable than expected.
Local, domestic, and international economic, political and industry-specific conditions and governmental monetary and fiscal policies affect the industries
in which the Company competes, directly and indirectly. Conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, volatile interest rates, tight money supply,
real estate values, international conflicts, global pandemics, natural disasters, risks related to climate change, and other factors outside of Cass’ control may
adversely affect the Company. Economic downturns could result in the delinquency of outstanding loans, which could have a material adverse impact on
Cass’ earnings.
Unfavorable developments concerning customer credit quality could affect Cass’ financial results.
Although the Company regularly reviews credit exposure related to its customers and various industry sectors in which it has business relationships, default
risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee. Under such circumstances, the Company could experience an increase in
the level of provision for credit losses, delinquencies, nonperforming assets, net charge-offs and allowance for credit losses.
Fluctuations in interest rates could affect Cass’ net interest income and balance sheet.
The operations of financial institutions such as the Company are dependent to a large degree on net interest income, which is the difference between
interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Prevailing economic conditions, the fiscal and monetary
policies of the federal government and the policies of various regulatory agencies all affect market rates of interest, which in turn significantly affect
financial institutions’ net interest income. Fluctuations in interest rates affect Cass’ financial statements, as they do for all financial institutions. Volatility in
interest rates can also result in disintermediation, which is the flow of funds away from financial institutions into direct investments, such as federal
government and corporate securities and other investment vehicles, which, because of the absence of federal insurance premiums and reserve requirements,
generally pay higher rates of return than financial institutions. Due in part to the increase in the Federal Funds rate throughout 2022, the Company's net
interest margin increased to 2.74% in 2022 from 2.31% in 2021, therefore increasing net interest income. As discussed in greater detail in Item 7A,
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” a decline in market interest rates would be expected to have a negative impact on the
Company’s net interest income.
The value of our goodwill and other intangible assets may decline in the future
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $21.4 million of goodwill and other intangible assets. A significant decline in the Company's expected future
cash flows, a significant adverse change in the business climate, slower growth rates or a significant and sustained decline in the price of the Company's
common stock may necessitate taking charges in the future related to the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
In certain circumstances, Cass remits payment of invoices prior to receiving funds from its customers. As such, Cass could experience losses if such
funds are not received from customers after payment is remitted.
Although the Company regularly reviews credit exposure related to its customers and various industry sectors in which it has business relationships, default
risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or foresee. Under such circumstances, the Company could experience losses related
to funds remitted for payment to freight carriers, utility companies and other such companies, prior to receiving funds from its customers.
10
Table of Contents
The Company has lending concentrations, including, but not limited to, faith-based ministries located in selected cities, franchise restaurants, and
privately-held businesses located in or near St. Louis, Missouri, that could suffer a significant decline which could adversely affect the Company.
Cass’ customer base consists, in part, of lending concentrations in several segments and geographical areas. If any of these segments or areas is
significantly affected by weak economic conditions, the Company could experience increased credit losses, and its business could be adversely affected.
The Company may be adversely impacted by the replacement of LIBOR as a reference rate.
The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and the administrator of LIBOR have announced that the publication of the most commonly used U.S.
dollar London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) settings will cease to be published or cease to be representative after June 30, 2023. The publication of
all other LIBOR settings ceased to be published as of December 31, 2021. The Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act, enacted in March 2022, provides a
statutory framework to replace U.S. dollar LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) for contracts governed
by U.S. law that have no or ineffective fallbacks, and in December 2022, the Federal Reserve Board adopted related implementing rules. Although
governmental authorities have endeavored to facilitate an orderly discontinuation of LIBOR, no assurance can be provided that this aim will be achieved or
that the use, level, and volatility of LIBOR or other interest rates or the value of LIBOR-based securities will not be adversely affected. As a result, and
despite the enactment of the LIBOR Act, for the most commonly used LIBOR settings, the use or selection of a successor rate could expose the Company
to risks associated with disputes and litigation with customers and counterparties and other market participants in connection with implementing LIBOR
fallback provisions.
While the Company does not currently originate loans tied to LIBOR, the Company has five loan relationships originated and/or purchased in prior periods
that include attributes that are tied to LIBOR. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates
will differ from those referencing LIBOR. Failure to adequately manage this transition process could adversely impact the Company's reputation.
Operations of the Company’s customer base are impacted by macro-economic factors such as a strong dollar and/or volatility in commodity prices. A
reduction in its customers’ operations could have a material adverse effect on Cass’ results of operations.
A decline in the cost of oil worldwide can have a negative effect on both the number of freight transactions processed and the dollar amount of invoices
processed. For example, lower oil prices can cause a significant drop in drilling supplies being transported to fracking operations by domestic railroads and
trucks. Lower oil prices can also result in lower gas and fuel prices, negatively affecting the dollar amounts of the invoices that Cass processes for its
freight and shipping customers. A decline in oil prices could have an adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and could significantly impact its results of
operations.
Business Operations and Strategic Risk
Operational difficulties or cybersecurity problems could damage Cass’ reputation and business.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company depends on the reliable operation of its computer operations and network connections from its clients to its
systems. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security of these systems would cause Cass to be unable to process transactions for its clients, resulting in
decreased revenues. The Company also relies on electronic communications and information systems to store sensitive customer data. Any failure,
interruption, breach in security or loss of data, whatever the cause, could reduce client satisfaction with the Company’s products and services and harm
Cass’ financial results. These types of threats may derive from human error, fraud or malice on the part of external or internal parties, or may result from
accidental technological failure. Further, to access the Company’s products and services, Cass’ customers may use computers and mobile devices that are
beyond the Company’s security control systems. The Company’s technologies, systems, networks and software, and those of other financial institutions
have been, and are likely to continue to be, the target of cybersecurity threats and attacks, which may range from uncoordinated individual attempts to
sophisticated and targeted measures directed at Cass. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, has
increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. A material security problem
affecting Cass could damage its reputation, deter prospects from purchasing its products and services, deter customers from using its products and services
or result in liability to Cass.
11
Table of Contents
Cloud technologies are also critical to the operation of the Company's systems, and reliance on cloud technologies is growing. Service disruptions in cloud
technologies may lead to delays in accessing, or the loss of, data that is important to the Company's businesses and may hinder customers access to
products and services.
Although the Company makes significant efforts to maintain the security and integrity of Cass’ information systems and have implemented various
measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that Cass’ security efforts and measures will be effective or that
attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities
remain potentially vulnerable because attempted security breaches, particularly cyber-attacks and intrusions, or disruptions will occur in the future, and
because the techniques used in such attempts are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are
designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. Accordingly, the Company may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement
adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is virtually impossible to entirely mitigate this risk. While specific “cyber” insurance
coverage is maintained, which would apply in the event of various breach scenarios, the amount of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case.
Furthermore, because cyber threat scenarios are inherently difficult to predict and can take many forms, some breaches may not be covered under Cass’
cyber insurance coverage. A security breach or other significant disruption of Cass’ information systems or those related to customers, merchants and third-
party vendors, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could i) disrupt the proper functioning of Cass’ networks and systems and therefore operations and/or
those of certain customers; ii) result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of confidential, sensitive or
otherwise valuable information of the Company or its customers; iii) result in a violation of applicable privacy, data breach and other laws, subjecting the
Company to additional regulatory scrutiny and expose Cass to civil litigation, governmental fines and possible financial liability; iv) require significant
management attention and resources to remedy the damages that result; or v) harm Cass’ reputation or cause a decrease in the number of customers that
choose to do business with the Company. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on Cass’ business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Cass must respond to rapid technological changes and these changes may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated.
If competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies, or if new industry standards and practices emerge, the Company’s
existing product and service offerings, technology and systems may become obsolete. Further, if Cass fails to adopt or develop new technologies or to adapt
its products and services to emerging industry standards, Cass may lose current and future customers. Finally, Cass’ ability to adopt these technologies can
also be inhibited by intellectual property rights of third parties. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and
results of operations. The payment processing and financial services industries are changing rapidly and in order to remain competitive, Cass must continue
to enhance and improve the functionality and features of its products, services and technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive than the
Company anticipates.
Methods of reducing risk exposures might not be effective.
Instruments, systems and strategies used to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of credit, interest rate, market and liquidity, operational,
regulatory/compliance, business risks and enterprise-wide risks could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, the Company may not be able to
effectively mitigate its risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk.
Customer borrowing, repayment, investment, deposit, and payable processing practices may be different than anticipated.
The Company uses a variety of financial tools, models and other methods to anticipate customer behavior as part of its strategic and financial planning and
to meet certain regulatory requirements. Individual, economic, political and industry-specific conditions and other factors outside of Cass’ control could
alter predicted customer borrowing, repayment, investment, deposit, and payable processing practices. Such a change in these practices could adversely
affect Cass’ ability to anticipate business needs, including cash flow and its impact on liquidity, and to meet regulatory requirements.
The Company’s allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) is subject to continuing evaluation and may be insufficient.
The Company maintains an ACL, which is a reserve established through a provision for credit losses charged to expense. The ACL is a valuation account
that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be
12
Table of Contents
collected on loans. Management uses a systematic, documented approach in determining the appropriate level of ACL, which represents management’s
estimate of losses in loans and off-balance sheet exposures as of the balance sheet date. Management estimated the allowance balance using relevant
available information from internal and external factors, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts based on
economic sources, such as Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”). Historical credit loss experience, of both the Company and similar peer banks, provides the
basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for asset quality trends, borrower’s ability to pay,
collateral, and other environmental factors. The ACL is measured on a collective pool basis when similar risk characteristics exist. The determination of the
appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires management to make estimates based on
risks and trends that are subject to material change. Continuing deterioration in economic conditions, including the possibility of a recession, affecting
borrowers and securities issuers; inflation; rising interest rates; new information regarding existing loans, credit commitments and securities holdings; the
lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or other global pandemics; natural disasters and risks related to climate change; and identification of
additional problem loans, ratings down-grades and other factors, both within and outside of the Company’s control, may require an increase in the
allowances for credit losses on loans, securities and off-balance sheet credit exposures.
The determination and application of the ACL accounting policy involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are subject to change. Changes in
these assumptions, estimates or the conditions surrounding them may have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity or results of
operations. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process, periodically review the ACL. Such agencies may require the
Company to recognize additions to the ACL or reserve increases to adversely graded classified loans based on information available to them at the time of
their examinations.
The application of the model used to determine the ACL could result in volatility in earnings. Additionally, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the ACL,
the Company will need additional provisions to increase the ACL. Any increases in the ACL will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital,
and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses and
Unfunded Commitments” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 1” for additional information.
Competitive product and pricing pressure within Cass’ markets may change.
The Company operates in a very competitive environment, which is characterized by competition from a number of other vendors and financial institutions
in each market in which it operates. The Company competes with large payment processors and national and regional financial institutions and also smaller
auditing companies and banks in terms of products and pricing. If the Company is unable to compete effectively in products and pricing in its markets,
business could decline.
Management’s ability to maintain and expand customer relationships may differ from expectations.
The industries in which the Company operates are very competitive. The Company not only competes for business opportunities with new customers, but
also competes to maintain and expand the relationships it has with its existing customers. The Company continues to experience pressures to maintain these
relationships as its competitors attempt to capture its customers.
The introduction, withdrawal, success and timing of business initiatives and strategies, including, but not limited to, the expansion of payment and
processing activities to new markets, the expansion of products and services to existing markets and opening of new bank branches, may be less
successful or may be different than anticipated. Such a result could adversely affect Cass’ business.
The Company makes certain projections as a basis for developing plans and strategies for its payment processing and banking products. If the Company
does not accurately determine demand for its products and services, it could result in the Company incurring significant expenses without the anticipated
increases in revenue, which could result in an adverse effect on its earnings.
13
Table of Contents
In addition, there are risks and uncertainties associated with the introduction of new products and services, including substantial investments of time and
resources. The introduction and development of new products and services may not be achieved along expected timelines, or at all, and may not be
successful as a result of factors beyond the Company’s control, including regulatory, competition and external market factors. Failure to successfully
manage these risks in the development and implementation of new products or services, and failure to integrate such new products and services into our
existing system of internal controls, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Company and the Bank are subject to liquidity risk.
The Company requires liquidity to meet deposit and accounts and drafts payable obligations as they come due. Access to funding sources in amounts
adequate to finance the Company’s commitments and business activities or on terms that are acceptable or favorable to the Company could be impaired by
risks and uncertainties that are beyond the Company’s control, including those described in this Item 1A, “Risk Factors” section.
The Company’s access to deposits and accounts and drafts payable for liquidity purposes may also be adversely affected by the needs of the Company’s
depositors and customers. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Management’s ability to retain key officers and employees may change.
Cass’ future operating results depend substantially upon the continued service of Cass’ executive officers and key personnel. Cass’ future operating results
also depend in significant part upon Cass’ ability to attract and retain qualified management, financial, technical, marketing, sales, and support personnel.
Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and the Company cannot ensure success in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. There may be only a
limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and it may be increasingly difficult for the Company to hire personnel over
time. Cass’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by the loss of any of its key employees, by the
failure of any key employee to perform in his or her current position, or by Cass’ inability to attract and retain skilled employees.
Regulatory, Legal and Accounting Risk
The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive government regulation and supervision and possible enforcement or other legal actions that could
detrimentally affect Cass’ business.
The Company and the Bank are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision, the primary focus of which is to protect customers,
depositors, the deposit insurance fund and the safety and soundness of the banking system as a whole, and not shareholders. In addition, since the global
financial crisis, financial institutions generally have been subject to increased scrutiny from regulatory authorities, with an increased focus on risk
management and consumer compliance. This regulatory structure and heightened focus gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection
with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to capital levels, the timing and amount of
dividend payments, the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Failure to comply with
applicable laws, regulations, policies or guidance could result in enforcement and other legal actions by federal and state authorities, including criminal and
civil penalties, the loss of FDIC insurance, revocation of a banking charter, and other regulatory sanctions, as well as reputational damage, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. The substance and impact of
pending or future legislation or regulation, or the application thereof, cannot be predicted, although any change could impact the regulatory structure under
which the Company or its competitors operate and may significantly increase costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes, require an
increase in regulatory capital, require modifications to the Company’s business strategy, and/or limit its ability to pursue business opportunities in an
efficient manner. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or any of its subsidiaries could have a material, adverse
effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
See Item 1, “Business—Supervision and Regulation,” and Item 8, Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for
additional information.
14
Table of Contents
The Company may need to raise additional capital or sell assets if it fails to meet regulatory capital requirements or meet commitments and liquidity
needs. Such capital may not be available on favorable terms, or at all.
Fully phased in, the Basel III Capital rules implemented stricter capital requirements and leverage limits and methods for calculating risk-weighted assets,
meaning the Company is required to hold more capital against such assets. Complying with these more stringent capital requirements could result in
management modifying its business strategy and could limit the Company’s ability to make distributions, including paying dividends, or buying back
shares.
The Company may also need to raise additional capital in the future to provide it with sufficient capital resources and liquidity to meet commitments and
business needs. The ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on, among other things, conditions in the capital markets at that time and the
Company’s financial condition, as well as the need for other financial institutions to raise capital at the same time. Economic conditions and the loss of
confidence in financial institutions may increase the cost of funding and limit access to certain customary sources of capital, including inter-bank
borrowings, repurchase agreements and borrowings from the discount window of the Federal Reserve.
An inability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Legal and regulatory proceedings and related matters with respect to the financial services industry, including those directly involving the Company
and its subsidiaries, could adversely affect Cass or the financial services industry in general.
The Company is subject to various legal and regulatory proceedings. It is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of these matters, and there can be no
assurance that the Company will prevail in any proceeding or litigation. Any such matter could result in substantial cost and diversion of Cass’ efforts,
which by itself could have a material adverse effect on Cass’ financial condition and operating results. Further, adverse determinations in such matters
could result in actions by Cass’ regulators that could materially adversely affect Cass’ business, financial condition or results of operations. Please refer to
Item 3, “Legal Proceedings.”
The Company’s accounting policies and methods are the basis of how Cass reports its financial condition and results of operations, and they require
management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. In addition, changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be
adopted by the regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or other authoritative bodies, could materially impact Cass’ financial
statements.
The Company’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how Cass records and reports its financial condition and results of operations.
Management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods in order to ensure that they comply with
generally accepted accounting principles and reflect management’s judgment as to the most appropriate manner in which to record and report Cass’
financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more
alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in the Company reporting materially different amounts than would
have been reported under a different alternative.
Cass has identified one accounting policy as being “critical” to the presentation of its financial condition and results of operations because it requires
management to make particularly subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that
materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. More information on Cass’ critical accounting
policies is contained in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
From time to time, the regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), and other authoritative bodies change the financial
accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can
materially impact how management records and reports the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Cass is subject to examinations and challenges by tax authorities, which, if not resolved in the Company’s favor, could adversely affect the Company’s
financial condition and results of operations.
In the normal course of business, Cass and its affiliates are routinely subject to examinations and challenges from federal and state tax authorities regarding
the amount of taxes due in connection with investments it has made and the businesses in
15
Table of Contents
which it is engaged. Recently, federal and state taxing authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial
institutions. These tax positions may relate to tax compliance, sales and use, franchise, gross receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including tax
base, apportionment and tax credit planning. The challenges made by tax authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or
deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in the Company’s favor, they could
have an adverse effect on Cass’ financial condition and results of operations.
General Risk Factors
Cass’ stock price can become volatile and fluctuate widely in response to a variety of factors.
The Company’s stock price can fluctuate based on factors that can include actual or anticipated variations in Cass’ quarterly results; new technology or
services by competitors; unanticipated losses or gains due to unexpected events, including losses or gains on securities held for investment purposes;
significant acquisitions or business combinations, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Company or its
competitors; changes in accounting policies or practices; failure to integrate acquisitions or realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions; or changes in
government regulations.
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, governmental
intervention, interest rate changes, credit loss trends, low trading volume or currency fluctuations also could cause Cass’ stock price to decrease regardless
of the Company’s operating results.
Certain events beyond the Company’s control, such as severe weather, natural disasters, terrorist activities or other hostilities, may adversely affect the
general economy, financial and capital markets, specific industries, and the Company.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of terrorism or other hostilities, and other adverse external events beyond the Company’s control, could have a
significant impact on the Company’s ability to conduct business. Such events could disrupt Cass’ operations or those of its customers, affect the stability of
the Bank’s deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property
damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause the Company to incur additional expenses. The occurrence of any such event in the future could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations.
Climate change could have a material negative impact on the Company and its clients
The Company's business, as well as the operations and activities of it clients, could be negatively impacted by climate change. Climate change presents
both immediate and long-term risks to Cass and its clients and these risks are expected to increase over time. Climate changes presents multi-faceted risks,
including (i) operational risk from the physical effects of climate events on facilities and other assets as well as those of clients; (ii) credit risk from
borrowers with significant exposure to climate risk; and (iii) reputational risk from stakeholder concerns about practices related to climate change, carbon
footprint and business relationships with clients who operate in carbon-intensive industries. The Company's business, reputation and ability to attract and
retain employees may also be harmed if the response to climate change is perceived to be ineffective or insufficient.
Climate change exposes Cass to physical risk as its effects may lead to more frequent and more extreme weather events, such as prolonged droughts or
flooding, tornados, hurricanes, wildfires and extreme seasonal weather; and longer-term shifts, such as increasing average temperatures, ozone depletion
and rising sea levels. Such events and long-term shifts may damage, destroy or otherwise impact the value or productivity of the Company's properties and
other assets; reduce the availability of insurance; and/or disrupt operations and other activities through prolonged outages. Such events and long-term shifts
may also have a significant impact on Cass customers, which could amplify credit risk by diminishing borrowers’ repayment capacity or collateral values,
and other businesses and counterparties with whom we transact, which could have a broader impact on the economy, supply chains and distribution
networks.
Climate change also exposes Cass to transition risks associated with the transition to a less carbon-dependent economy. Transition risks may result from
changes in policies; laws and regulations; technologies; and/or market preferences to address climate change. Such changes could materially, negatively
impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or our reputation, in addition to having a similar impact on our clients. Cass has clients
who operate in carbon-intensive industries that are exposed to climate risks, such as those risks related to the transition to a less carbon-
16
Table of Contents
dependent economy, as well as clients who operate in low-carbon industries that may be subject to risks associated with new technologies. Federal and state
banking regulators and supervisory authorities, investors and other stakeholders have increasingly viewed financial institutions as important in helping to
address the risks related to climate change both directly and with respect to their clients, which may result in financial institutions coming under increased
pressure regarding the disclosure and management of their climate risks and related lending and investment activities. Given that climate change could
impose systemic risks upon the financial sector, either via disruptions in economic activity resulting from the physical impacts of climate change or
changes in policies as the economy transitions to a less carbon-intensive environment, the Company faces regulatory risk of increasing focus on the
resilience to climate-related risks, including in the context of stress testing for various climate stress scenarios. Ongoing legislative or regulatory
uncertainties and changes regarding climate risk management and practices may result in higher regulatory, compliance, credit and reputational risks and
costs.
The Company is subject to Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) risks that could adversely affect its reputation and the market price of its
securities.
The Company is subject to a variety of risks arising from ESG matters. ESG matters include climate risk, hiring practices, the diversity of the work force,
and racial and social justice issues involving the Company’s personnel, customers and third parties with whom it otherwise does business. Risks arising
from ESG matters may adversely affect, among other things, reputation and the market price of the Company’s securities. Further, the Company may be
exposed to negative publicity based on the identity and activities of those to whom it lends and with which it otherwise does business and the public’s view
of the approach and performance of its customers and business partners with respect to ESG matters. Any such negative publicity could arise from adverse
news coverage in traditional media and could also spread through the use of social media platforms. The Company’s relationships and reputation with its
existing and prospective customers and third parties with which it does business could be damaged if it were to become the subject of any such negative
publicity. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to attract and retain customers and employees and could have a negative
impact on the market price for securities. Investors have begun to consider the steps taken and resources allocated by financial institutions and other
commercial organizations to address ESG matters when making investment and operational decisions. Certain investors are beginning to incorporate the
business risks of climate change and the adequacy of companies’ responses to the risks posed by climate change and other ESG matters into their
investment theses. These shifts in investing priorities may result in adverse effects on the market price of the Company’s securities to the extent that
investors determine that the Company has not made sufficient progress on ESG matters.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company leases office space in St. Louis County, Missouri, to house the headquarters of the Company and the Bank. The Company’s headquarters
occupy 7,549 square feet in an office center at 12444 Powerscourt Drive. The Bank’s headquarters occupy 16,572 square feet in the same center at 12412
Powerscourt Drive.
The Company owns approximately 61,500 square feet of office space at 13001 Hollenberg Drive in Bridgeton, Missouri where the Company’s
transportation processing activities are performed.
The Company owns a production facility of approximately 48,300 square feet located at 2675 Corporate Exchange Drive, Columbus, Ohio. Additional
facilities are located in Greenville, South Carolina, Wellington, Kansas, Jacksonville, Florida, and Brighton, Michigan. The Company has offices in Breda,
Netherlands, Basingstoke, United Kingdom, and Singapore to service its multinational customers.
In addition, the Bank owns a banking facility near downtown St. Louis, Missouri, has an operating branch in the Bridgeton, Missouri location, and has an
additional leased facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
Management believes that these facilities are suitable and adequate for the Company’s operations.
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and its subsidiaries are not involved in any pending proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their businesses.
Management believes none of these proceedings, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business or financial conditions of the
Company or its subsidiaries.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
18
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s common stock is quoted on The Nasdaq Global Select Market® under the symbol “CASS.” As of February 15, 2023, there were
approximately 5,405 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.
The Company has continuously paid regularly scheduled cash dividends since 1934 and expects to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends in the future.
However, future dividend payments will depend on the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, applicable banking regulatory
requirements and other factors considered relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors.
The Company maintains a treasury stock buyback program approved by the Board of Directors in October 2021 pursuant to which the Board of Directors
has authorized the repurchase of up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and has no expiration date. The Company has repurchased 409,293
shares under this treasury stock buyback program and therefore has 340,707 shares remaining for repurchase.
The Company repurchased a total of 130,374 shares at an aggregate cost of $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 713,857 shares at an
aggregate cost of $31.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. A portion of the repurchased shares may be used for the Company’s employee
benefit plans and the balance will be available for other general corporate purposes. The pace of repurchase activity will depend on factors such as levels of
regulatory capital, cash generation from operations, cash requirements for investments, repayment of debt, current stock price, business and market
conditions, and other factors. The Company may repurchase shares from time to time on the open market or in private transactions, including structured
transactions. The stock repurchase program may be modified or discontinued at any time.
During the three months ended December 31, 2022, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock pursuant to its treasury stock buyback
program.
19
Table of Contents
Performance Quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market for the Last Five Fiscal Years
The following graph compares the cumulative total returns over the last five fiscal years of a hypothetical investment of $100 in shares of common stock of
the Company with a hypothetical investment of $100 in The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), the index of Nasdaq computer and data processing stocks,
and the index of Nasdaq bank stocks. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2017, with dividends reinvested. Returns are based on period
end prices.
ITEM 6. RESERVED
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is intended to promote understanding
of the results of operations and financial condition. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of
operations for 2022 compared to 2021. For discussion related to the results of operations and changes in financial condition for 2021 compared to 2020
refer to Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's 2021 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022.
The Company intends for the discussion of financial condition and results of operations that follows to provide information that will assist the reader in
understanding the Consolidated Financial Statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary
factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies, and estimates affect the Consolidated Financial Statements.
This discussion should be read in conjunction the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear in Part II, Item 8 of this document.
Executive Overview
The specific payment and information processing services provided to each customer are developed individually to meet each customer’s requirements,
which can vary greatly. In addition, the degree of automation such as electronic data interchange, imaging, work flow, and web-based solutions varies
greatly among customers and industries. These factors combine so that pricing varies greatly among the customer base. In general, however, Cass is
compensated for its processing services through service fees, transactional level payment services, and investment of account balances
20
Table of Contents
generated during the payment process. The amount, type, and calculation of service fees vary greatly by service offering, but generally follow the volume
of transactions processed. Transactional level payment services and interest income from the balances generated during the payment processing cycle are
affected by the amount of time Cass holds the funds prior to payment and the dollar volume processed. Both the number of transactions processed and the
dollar volume processed are therefore key metrics followed by management. Other factors will also influence revenue and profitability, such as changes in
the general level of interest rates, which have a significant effect on net interest income. The funds generated by these processing activities are invested in
overnight investments, investment grade securities, advances to payees, and loans generated by the Bank. The Bank earns most of its revenue from net
interest income, or the difference between the interest earned on its loans and investments and the interest paid on its deposits and other borrowings. The
Bank also assesses fees on other services such as cash management services.
Industry-wide factors that impact the Company include the willingness of large corporations to outsource key business functions such as freight, energy,
telecommunication and environmental payment and audit. The benefits that can be achieved by outsourcing transaction processing, and the management
information generated by Cass’ systems can be influenced by factors such as the competitive pressures within industries to improve profitability, the
general level of transportation costs, deregulation of energy costs, and consolidation of telecommunication providers. Economic factors that impact the
Company include the general level of economic activity that can affect the volume and size of invoices processed, the ability to hire and retain qualified
staff, and the growth and quality of the loan portfolio. The general level of interest rates also has a significant effect on the revenue of the Company. As
discussed in greater detail in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” a decline in the general level of interest rates can have
a negative impact on net interest income and conversely, a rise in the general level of interest rates can have a positive impact on net interest income. The
cost of fuel is another factor that has a significant impact on the transportation sector. As the price of fuel goes up or down, the Company’s earnings
increase or decrease with the dollar amount of transportation invoices.
The Company recorded revenue of $182.5 million in 2022, up 18.4% from the prior year, primarily due to an increase in transportation and facility dollar
volumes processed and rising interest rates. Net income was $34.9 million, and diluted EPS was $2.53 per share, increases of 22.0% and 26.5% from the
prior year, respectively.
The Company continues to operate profitably, posting a 1.35% return on average assets and 16.53% return on average equity. The Company’s common
equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 12.80% at December 31, 2022, significantly exceeding regulatory requirements. In addition, the Company has maintained
exceptional credit quality with non-performing loans to total loans of 0.11% at December 31, 2022 and no loan charge-offs during the year ended
December 31, 2022.
The Company’s solid capital and liquidity positions, combined with ongoing earnings, are expected to continue to allow for investment in strategic
opportunities when they become available, in addition to return of capital to shareholders. The Company delivered $20.7 million in dividend payments and
share repurchases during 2022. The Company continues to invest in the technology, processes, and people required to support its multi-national customer
base.
Currently, management views Cass’ major opportunity as the continued expansion of its payment and information processing service offerings and
customer base. Management intends to accomplish this by maintaining the Company’s leadership position in applied technology, which when combined
with the security and processing controls of the Bank, makes Cass unique in the industry.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company has prepared the consolidated financial statements in this report in accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. These estimates have been generally accurate in the past, have been consistent and have not required any material changes. There can be no
assurances that actual results will not differ from those estimates. A summary of significant accounting policies and a summary of recent accounting
pronouncements applicable to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—
Note 1.”
The accounting policy that requires significant management estimates and is deemed critical to the Company’s results of operations or financial position
has been discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and is described below.
21
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses. The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its loan portfolio to determine management’s estimate of
the lifetime expected credit losses. The process combines many factors: economic factors, historical credit loss experience, of both the Company and
similar peer banks, loan portfolio growth and concentrations, asset quality, risk tolerance, and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect
future credit loss. Given the Company's recent historical loss experience, the impact of the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL is a
substantial percentage of the overall ACL. Because current economic conditions and forecasts can change and future events are inherently difficult to
predict, the anticipated amount of estimated credit losses, and therefore the appropriateness of the ACL, could change significantly. It is difficult to estimate
how potential changes in any one economic factor or input might affect the overall allowance because a wide variety of factors and inputs are considered in
estimating the ACL and changes in those factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all loan types.
Additionally, changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor may offset deterioration in others.
Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process, periodically review the ACL. Such agencies may require the Company to
recognize additions to the ACL or reserve increases to adversely graded classified loans based on information available to them at the time of their
examinations. The Company believes the level of ACL is appropriate. These policies affect both segments of the Company. The impact and associated risks
related to these policies on the Company’s business operations are discussed in the Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and Note 4
"Loans," as well as the “Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses and Allowance for Unfunded Commitments” section of this report.
Summary of Results
(In thousands except per share data)
2022
2021
2020
2022 v. 2021
2021 v. 2020
For the Years Ended December 31,
% Change
Processing fees
Financial fees
Net interest income
Provision for (release of) credit losses
Other
Total revenues
Operating expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Diluted earnings per share
Return on average assets
Return on average equity
$
$
$
$
$
$
76,470
43,757
58,844
1,350
4,755
182,476
139,576
42,900
7,996
34,904
2.53
1.35 %
16.53 %
$
$
$
74,589
32,733
44,326
(130)
2,369
154,147
120,326
33,821
5,217
28,604
2.00
1.23 %
11.29 %
74,638
23,107
45,325
810
2,696
144,956
114,615
30,341
5,165
25,176
1.73
1.29 %
10.23 %
2.5 %
33.7
32.8
(1138.5)
100.7
18.4
16.0
26.8
53.3
22.0
26.5
—
—
(0.1)%
41.7
(2.2)
(116.0)
(12.1)
6.3
5.0
11.5
1.0
13.6
15.6
—
—
The Company recorded revenue of $182.5 million in 2022, up 18.4% from the prior year, primarily due to an increase in transportation and facility dollar
volumes processed and rising interest rates. Net income was $34.9 million, and diluted EPS was $2.53 per share, increases of 22.0% and 26.5% from the
prior year, respectively.
The Company posted a 1.35% return on average assets and 16.53% return on average equity.
Further detail about the components of revenue and expenses are explained in the sections following.
22
Table of Contents
Fee Revenue and Other Income
The Company’s fee revenue is derived mainly from transportation and facility payment and processing fees. As the Company provides its processing and
payment services, it is compensated by service fees which are typically calculated on a per-item basis, discounts received for services provided to carriers
and by the accounts and drafts payable balances generated in the payment process which can be used to generate interest income. Processing volumes, fee
revenue and other income were as follows:
(In thousands)
2022
2021
2020
2022 v. 2021
2021 v. 2020
December 31,
% Change
Transportation invoice transaction volume
Transportation invoice dollar volume
Facility transaction volume
Facility dollar volume
Processing fees
Financial fees
Other fees
(1)
(1)
36,807
44,749,359 $
12,990
19,514,049 $
76,470 $
43,757 $
4,755 $
$
$
$
$
$
36,783
36,829,841 $
12,499
15,867,556 $
74,589 $
32,733 $
2,369 $
33,184
26,516,803
12,572
13,458,231
74,638
23,107
2,696
0.1 %
21.5
3.9
23.0
2.5
33.7
100.7
10.8 %
38.9
(0.6)
17.9
(0.1)
41.7
(12.1)
(1)
Includes energy, telecom and environmental
Financial fees increased $11.0 million, or 33.7%, in 2022 as a result of the increases in total invoice dollars processed and paid and a higher interest rate
environment as compared to the prior year. Transportation and facility invoice dollars processed and paid increased 21.5% and 23.0%, respectively. The
significant increase in dollars processed and paid was due to inflationary pressures and higher energy prices, among other factors.
Processing fees increased $1.9 million, or 2.5%, during 2022 largely driven by a 3.9% increase in facility transaction volumes as well as an increase in fees
received for ancillary processing services.
Other revenue increased $2.4 million as compared to the prior year primarily due to the TouchPoint acquisition in June 2022 and increased bank service
fees due to customer growth.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on loans, investments, and other earning assets and interest expense on deposits and other
interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a significant source of the Company’s revenues. The following table summarizes the changes in tax-
equivalent net interest income and related factors:
(In thousands)
2022
December 31,
2021
Average earning assets
(1)
Net interest income
Net interest margin
Yield on earning assets
Rate on interest bearing liabilities
(1)
(1)
$
$
2,205,792
60,533
$
$
1,999,609
46,199
$
$
2.74 %
2.90 %
0.58 %
2.31 %
2.37 %
0.20 %
2020
1,674,297
47,214
2.82 %
2.96 %
0.49 %
% Change
2022 v. 2021
2021 v. 2020
10.3 %
31.0
—
—
—
19.4 %
(2.1)
—
—
—
(1)
Presented on a tax-equivalent basis using a tax rate of 21%.
The increase in net interest income in 2022 compared to 2021 is primarily due to the Federal Reserve’s actions to increase the Federal Funds rate
throughout the year of 2022, positively affecting the net interest rate margin which increased to 2.74% as compared to 2.31% in the prior year. Additionally,
a 10.3% increase in average earning assets contributed to the increase in net interest income. The yield on interest-earning assets increased 53 basis points
from 2.37% in 2021 to 2.90% in 2022 while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 38 basis points from 0.20% in 2021 to 0.58% in 2022.
Average loans increased $104.3 million, or 11.8%, to $992.0 million. This increase was due to solid loan growth during 2022, specifically in the Company's
franchise restaurants, faith-based and lease financing receivables portfolios. These
23
Table of Contents
increases were offset by a $64.9 million decrease in average PPP loans as compared to 2021. The average yield on loans increased 2 basis points to 3.98%
in 2022 as the increase in market interest rates was offset by a decline of $2.4 million in PPP loan fees.
Average investment securities increased $291.2 million, or 58.5%. The Company purchased investment securities throughout 2021 and 2022 in an effort to
deploy short-term investments into investment securities to enhance the yield on interest-earning assets. The investment portfolio will expand and contract
over time as the Company manages its liquidity and interest rate position. The average tax-equivalent yield on investment securities in 2022 was consistent
with 2021 at 2.30%.
Average short-term investments, consisting of interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and federal funds sold, decreased $189.3 million, or
30.8%. The decrease is primarily a result of the increase in the average balances of investment securities, loans, payments in advance of funding and bank
owned life insurance, partially offset by the increase in the average balances of deposits and accounts and drafts payable. The average yield on short-term
investments increased 139 basis points to 1.51% in 2022 due to the increase in short-term market interest rates. The vast majority of these short-term
investments are held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
Average interest-bearing deposits increased $11.2 million, or 1.9%, and average non-interest-bearing demand deposits increased $140.2 million, or 31.3%.
These increases were largely due to organic growth within our customer base. The cost of interest-bearing deposits increased 38 basis points to 0.58% in
2022 as a result of the rising rate environment.
Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity; Interest Rate and Interest Differential
The following table contains condensed average balance sheets for each of the periods reported, the tax-equivalent interest income and expense on each
category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the average yield on such categories of interest-earning assets and the average rates
paid on such categories of interest-bearing liabilities for each of the periods reported:
24
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
(1)
Assets
Interest-earning assets
(2),
:
Loans
Securities
(4)
:
Taxable
Tax-exempt
(3)
Certificates of deposit
Short-term investments
Total interest-earning assets
Non-interest-earning assets
Cash and due from banks
Premises and equipment, net
Payments in excess of funding
Bank owned life insurance
Goodwill and other intangibles
Unrealized (loss) gain on investment
securities
Other assets
Allowance for credit losses
2022
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Balance
Yield/ Rate
Average
Balance
2021
Interest
Income/
Expense
Yield/ Rate
Average
Balance
2020
Interest
Income/
Expense
Yield/ Rate
$
992,004 $
39,460
3.98 % $
887,662 $
35,178
3.96 % $
906,361 $
37,665
4.16 %
509,537
279,247
—
425,004
2,205,792
20,772
19,291
278,185
46,468
19,558
(43,147)
51,686
(12,527)
10,083
8,043
—
6,429
64,015
1.98
2.88
—
1.51
2.90
192,885
304,672
—
614,390
2,547
8,919
—
726
1,999,609
47,370
1.32
2.93
—
0.12
2.37
21,220
17,846
211,809
26,766
17,273
15,833
35,231
(11,595)
1,686
8,993
6
1,226
49,576
2.22
3.11
2.35
0.30
2.96
75,938
289,316
255
402,427
1,674,297
16,979
19,623
160,692
17,817
18,132
18,368
37,218
(11,016)
Total assets
$
2,586,078
$
2,333,992
$
1,952,110
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities
(1)
Interest-bearing demand deposits
$
549,054 $
3,118
0.57 % $
521,409 $
Savings deposits
Time deposits >=$250
Other time deposits
Total interest-bearing deposits
Short-term borrowings
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits
Accounts and drafts payable
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
13,288
18,272
22,637
603,251
11
603,262
588,121
1,141,329
42,224
2,374,936
211,142
38
181
145
3,482
—
3,482
0.29
0.99
0.64
0.58
—
0.58
18,398
14,576
37,676
592,059
10
592,069
447,880
986,572
54,035
2,080,556
253,436
582
9
139
441
1,171
—
1,171
0.11 % $
398,585 $
1,313
0.33 %
24
267
756
2,360
2
2,362
0.17
1.33
1.58
0.49
3.28
0.49
0.05
0.95
1.17
0.20
—
0.20
13,819
20,036
47,970
480,410
61
480,471
356,433
803,605
65,513
1,706,022
246,088
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
(3)
Net interest income
$
2,586,078
$
60,533
$
2,333,992
$
1,952,110
$
46,199
$
47,214
Net interest margin
(3)
Interest spread
2.74 %
2.32 %
2.31 %
2.17 %
2.82 %
2.47 %
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Balances shown are daily averages.
Interest income on loans includes net loan fees of $684,000, $3.4 million, and $3.6 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Loan fees
include $167,000, $2.6 million, and $3.1 million of PPP loan fees for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 21%. The tax-equivalent adjustment was approximately $1.7 million
for 2022 and $1.9 million for each of 2021 and 2020.
For purposes of these computations, yields on investment securities are computed as interest income divided by the average amortized cost of the
investments.
25
Table of Contents
Analysis of Net Interest Income Changes
The following table presents the changes in interest income and expense between years due to changes in volume and interest rates.
2022 Over 2021
2021 Over 2020
(In thousands)
Volume
(1)
Rate
(1)
Total
Volume
(1)
Rate
(1)
Total
Increase (decrease) in interest
income:
(2),
Loans
:
Securities:
Taxable
Tax-exempt
Certificates of deposit
(3)
Short-term investments
Total interest income
Interest expense on:
Interest-bearing demand
deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits >=$250
Other time deposits
Short-term borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
$
$
$
$
4,150 $
132 $
4,282 $
(766) $
(1,721) $
(2,487)
5,780
(734)
—
(291)
1,756
(142)
—
5,994
7,536
(876)
—
5,703
1,761
463
(6)
256
(900)
(537)
—
(756)
861
(74)
(6)
(500)
8,905 $
7,740 $
16,645 $
1,708 $
(3,914) $
(2,206)
32 $
(3)
36
(139)
—
(74)
8,979 $
2,504 $
32
6
(157)
—
2,385
5,355 $
2,536 $
29
42
(296)
—
2,311
318 $
6
(63)
(143)
(1)
117
14,334 $
1,591 $
(1,049) $
(21)
(65)
(172)
(1)
(1,308)
(2,606) $
(731)
(15)
(128)
(315)
(2)
(1,191)
(1,015)
(1)
(2)
(3)
The change in interest due to the combined rate/volume variance has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each.
Interest income includes net loan fees.
Interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 21%.
Loan Portfolio
Interest earned on the loan portfolio is a primary source of income for the Company. The loan portfolio was $1.08 billion, representing 42.1% of the
Company's total assets as of December 31, 2022 and generated $39.5 million in interest income during the year then ended. The following tables show the
composition of the loan portfolio at the end of the periods indicated and remaining maturities for loans as of December 31, 2022.
Loans by Type
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate (commercial and faith-based):
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total loans
December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
561,616 $
450,336 $
298,984
495,280
25,968
—
42
464,341
39,461
6,299
130
$
1,082,906 $
960,567 $
434,080
48,908
109,704
—
891,676
26
Table of Contents
Loans by Maturity as of December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real Estate:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total loans
One Year
Or Less
Over 1 Year
Through 5 Years
Fixed
Rate
Floating
Rate
Fixed
Rate
Floating
Rate
Over 5 Years
Through 15 Years
Fixed
Rate
Floating
Rate
(1)
Total
$
13,708 $
42,342 $
256,197 $
24,189 $
221,287 $
3,893 $
561,616
20,904
8,096
—
—
42,708 $
7,142
13,136
—
42
62,662 $
304,823
950
—
—
561,970 $
15,915
3,786
—
—
43,890 $
133,617
—
—
—
354,904 $
12,879
—
—
—
16,772 $
495,280
25,968
—
42
1,082,906
$
(1)
The Company did not have any loans with maturities greater than 15 years.
The Company has no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans, which are not otherwise disclosed in the loan portfolio composition table and as
are discussed in Item 8, Note 4, of this report. The Company's primary market niche for banking services is privately held businesses, franchise restaurants,
and faith-based ministries.
Loans to commercial entities are generally secured by the business assets of the borrower, including accounts receivable, inventory, machinery and
equipment, and the real estate from which the borrower operates. Operating lines of credit to these companies generally are secured by accounts receivable
and inventory, with specific percentages of each determined on a customer-by-customer basis based on various factors including the type of business.
Intermediate term credit for machinery and equipment is generally provided at some percentage of the value of the equipment purchased, depending on the
type of machinery or equipment purchased by the entity. Loans secured exclusively by real estate to businesses and faith-based ministries are generally
made with a maximum 80% loan to value ratio, depending upon the Company's estimate of the resale value and ability of the property to generate cash.
The Company's loan policy requires an independent appraisal for all loans over $500,000 secured by real estate. Company management monitors the local
economy in an attempt to determine whether it has had a significant deteriorating effect on such real estate loans. When problems are identified, appraised
values are updated on a continual basis, either internally or through an updated external appraisal.
Loans increased $122.3 million, or 12.7%, to $1.08 billion at December 31, 2022. Lease finance receivables and franchise restaurant loans, which are both
included in commercial and industrial loans, increased $80.4 million, or 100.1%, and $34.3 million, or 18.1%, respectively, during 2022. These increases
were due to organic growth in an effort to expand these loan types. Faith-based mortgages increased $31.7 million, or 8.9%, during 2022. These increases
were partially offset by the decrease in PPP loans of $6.3 million at December 31, 2021 to $0 at December 31, 2022. Additional details regarding the types
and maturities of loans in the loan portfolio are contained in the tables above and in Item 8, Note 4.
Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans and Allowance for Unfunded Commitments
The Company recorded a provision for credit losses and off-balance sheet credit exposures of $1.4 million in 2022 and a release of credit losses of
$130,000 in 2021. The amount of the provision for (release of) credit losses was derived from the Company’s CECL model. The amount of the provision
will fluctuate as determined by these analyses. The Company had net loan recoveries of $13,000 and $27,000 in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The ACL was
$13.5 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $12.0 million at December 31, 2021. The ACL represented 1.25% of outstanding loans at both December
31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The allowance for unfunded commitments was $232,000 at December 31, 2022 and $367,000 at December 31, 2021.
There was one nonperforming loan outstanding with an outstanding balance of $1.2 million, or 0.11% of total loans, at December 31, 2022 and no
nonperforming loans outstanding at December 31, 2021. The single nonperforming loan at December 31, 2022 paid off in full during January 2023.
The ACL has been established and is maintained to estimate the lifetime credit losses expected in the loan portfolio. An ongoing assessment is performed
to determine if the balance is adequate. Charges or credits are made to expense based on changes in the economic forecast, qualitative risk factors, loan
volume, and individual loans. For loans that are individually
27
Table of Contents
evaluated, the Company uses two impairment measurement methods: 1) the present value of expected future cash flows and 2) collateral values.
Federal and state regulatory agencies review the Company’s methodology for maintaining the ACL. These agencies may require the Company to adjust the
ACL based on their judgments and interpretations about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
The following schedule summarizes activity in the ACL and the allocation of the allowance to the Company’s loan categories.
Summary of Credit Loss Experience
(In thousands)
Allowance at beginning of year
Loans charged-off:
Commercial and industrial
Real estate (commercial and faith-based):
Mortgage
Construction
Other
Total loans charged-off
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial and industrial
Real estate (commercial and faith-based):
Mortgage
Construction
Other
Total recoveries of loans previously charged-off
Net loans recovered
Provision for credit losses
Allowance at end of year
Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASU
2016-13)
Allowance at beginning of next year
Allowance for unfunded commitments at
beginning of year
(Release of) provision for credit losses
Allowance for unfunded commitments at end of
year
Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASU
2016-13)
Allowance for unfunded commitments at
beginning of next year
Loans outstanding:
Average
December 31
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to loans
outstanding at December 31
Ratio of net recoveries to average loans
outstanding
Allocation of allowance for credit losses
(1)
:
Commercial and industrial
Real estate (commercial and faith-based):
Mortgage
Construction
Other
Total
Percentage of categories to total loans:
Commercial and industrial
Real estate (commercial and faith-based):
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total
2022
2021
December 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
12,041
$
11,944
$
11,279
$
10,225
$
10,205
—
—
—
—
—
13
—
—
—
13
(13)
1,485
13,539
—
13,539
367
(135)
232
—
232
992,004
1,082,906
1.25 %
—
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
12
15
—
—
27
(27)
70
12,041
—
12,041
567
(200)
367
—
367
887,662
960,567
1.25 %
—
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
19
1
—
—
20
(20)
645
11,944
—
11,944
402
165
567
—
567
906,631
891,676
1.34 %
—
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
81
—
—
—
81
(81)
250
10,556
723
11,279
—
—
—
402
402
760,153
772,638
1.37 %
(0.01)%
$
$
$
$
$
—
—
—
—
—
20
—
—
—
20
(20)
—
10,225
—
10,225
—
—
—
—
—
710,846
721,587
1.42 %
—
5,977
$
5,035
$
4,635
$
4,874
$
4,179
7,378
184
—
13,539
$
6,714
292
—
12,041
$
6,892
417
—
11,944
$
5,370
312
—
10,556
$
5,378
244
424
10,225
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
51.9 %
46.9 %
33.5 %
41.9 %
38.4 %
45.7 %
2.4 %
— %
— %
100.0 %
48.3 %
4.1 %
0.7 %
— %
100.0 %
48.7 %
5.5 %
12.3 %
— %
100.0 %
52.8 %
5.3 %
— %
— %
100.0 %
57.1 %
4.5 %
— %
— %
100.0 %
(1)
Although specific allocations exist, the entire allowance is available to absorb losses in any particular loan category.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming loans are defined as loans on non-accrual status and loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing. Nonperforming assets include
nonperforming loans plus foreclosed real estate. Troubled debt restructurings are not included in nonperforming loans unless they are on non-accrual status
or past due 90 days or more.
It is the policy of the Company to continually monitor its loan portfolio and to discontinue the accrual of interest on any loan for which collection is not
probable. Subsequent payments received on such loans are applied to principal if collection of principal is not probable; otherwise, these receipts are
recorded as interest income. There was no interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans for the years ended 2022 and 2021.
There was one nonaccrual loan of $1.2 million at December 31, 2022 and no nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2021. There were no foreclosed assets at
December 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021. The single nonperforming loan at December 31, 2022 paid off in full during January 2023.
The Company does not have any foreign loans. The Company's loan portfolio includes $212,000 of single family real estate mortgages, as the Company
does not market its services to retail customers. Also, the Company had no sub-prime mortgage loans or residential development loans in its portfolio in
any of the years presented.
The Company does not have any other interest-earning assets which would have been included in nonaccrual, past due or restructured loans if such assets
were loans.
28
Table of Contents
Summary of Nonperforming Assets
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial:
Nonaccrual
Contractually past due 90 days or more and
still accruing
Real estate – mortgage:
Nonaccrual
Contractually past due 90 days or more and
still accruing
Total nonperforming loans
Total foreclosed assets
Total nonperforming assets
$
$
$
Operating Expenses
2022
2021
December 31,
2020
2019
2018
1,150 $
— $
— $
— $
—
—
—
1,150 $
—
1,150 $
—
—
—
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
— $
—
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Operating expenses in 2022 compared to 2021 and 2020 include the following significant pre-tax components:
(In thousands)
Personnel
Occupancy
Equipment
Amortization of intangible assets
Other operating
Total operating expense
2022
December 31,
2021
2020
$
$
106,474 $
3,676
6,668
680
22,078
139,576 $
92,155 $
3,824
6,745
859
16,743
120,326 $
88,062
3,739
6,568
859
15,387
114,615
Total operating expenses increased 16.0% in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily as a result of higher personnel and other operating expenses.
Personnel expense increased $14.3 million, or 15.5%, to $106.5 million as a result of merit increases, wage pressures, an increase in average full-time
equivalent employees of 10.0% due to the TouchPoint acquisition and strategic investment in optical character recognition, artificial intelligence, machine
learning and other processes to consume images and produce data. Also driving the increase in personnel expense was an increase in stock compensation
and profit sharing due to improved Company earnings and the impact on performance based restricted stock. Stock compensation increased $3.9 million
and profit sharing increased $1.4 million as compared to the prior year.
Other operating expense increased $5.3 million, or 31.9%, to $22.1 million as a result of higher levels of travel, business development, employee
procurement, data processing, insurance, and other professional fees. Partially causing the increase in data processing, other professional fees, and other
operating expenses are investments in technology initiatives, resulting in elevated expense levels as multiple technology platforms are being maintained
prior to switching over to what the Company believes will be more efficient technology platforms for facility and freight data entry processing by the end
of 2023.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense in 2022 totaled $8.0 million, compared to $5.2 million in 2021. When measured as a percent of pre-tax income, the Company’s
effective tax rate was 18.6% and 15.4% in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily due
to changes in the levels of tax credits, tax-free interest
29
Table of Contents
income on municipal securities, and other miscellaneous book to tax true-ups upon filing of the Company's tax returns for the years ended December 31,
2021 and 2020.
Investment Portfolio
Investment securities increased $81.0 million, or 12.0%, during 2022 to $754.5 million at December 31, 2022. U.S. Treasury securities increased to
$155.3 million during 2022 compared to none held in 2021. State and political securities decreased $76.0 million, or 20.5%, to $295.1 million as a result of
runoff in the portfolio and a decrease in fair value due to the change in market interest rates. The investment portfolio provides the Company with a
significant source of earnings, secondary source of liquidity, and mechanisms to manage the effects of changes in loan demand and interest rates.
Therefore, the size, asset allocation and maturity distribution of the investment portfolio will vary over time depending on management’s assessment of
current and future interest rates, changes in loan demand, changes in the Company’s sources of funds and the economic outlook. During 2022, the
Company's purchase of investment securities totaled $232.1 million.
There was no single issuer of securities in the investment portfolio at December 31, 2022 for which the aggregate amortized cost exceeded 10% of total
shareholders' equity.
Investments by Type
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or
sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Asset-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or sponsored
enterprises
Treasury securities
2022
December 31,
2021
2020
295,126 $
371,128 $
305,974
173,939
85,097
45,023
155,283
754,468 $
168,646
84,338
49,341
—
673,453 $
51,752
—
—
—
357,726
$
$
Total investments
Investment Securities by Maturity
(At December 31, 2022)
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or
sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Asset-backed securities issued or guaranteed
by U.S. Government agencies or sponsored
enterprises
Treasury securities
Total investments
Weighted average yield
(1)
Within 1
Year
Over 1 to 5
Years
Over 5 to
10 Years
Over
10 Years
$
16,197
$
117,515
$
109,509
$
51,905
Yield
2.77 %
(1)
44
—
353
37,592
48,264
47,505
—
48,980
65,221
3.30 %
$
$
—
106,303
261,763
$
—
—
205,278
$
3.34 %
2.23 %
2.24 %
125,278
—
45,023
—
222,206
1.71 %
2.82 %
4.32 %
2.67 %
2.57 %
2.57 %
(1)
Yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 21%.
Deposits and Accounts and Drafts Payable
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased 10.3% to $642.8 million at December 31, 2022 primarily as a result of an increase in balances related to
CassPay customers. These balances can fluctuate significantly on a day to day basis. Interest-bearing deposits decreased $24.4 million, or 3.8%, to $614.5
million at December 31, 2022.
30
Table of Contents
Accounts and drafts payable generated by the Company in its payment processing operations increased $17.2 million, or 1.6%, to $1.07 billion, at
December 31, 2022. Due to the Company’s payment processing cycle, average balances are much more indicative of the underlying activity than period-
end balances since point-in-time comparisons can be misleading if the comparison dates fall on different days of the week. Average accounts and drafts
payable increased $154.8 million, or 15.7%, to $1.14 billion during 2022. The higher average accounts and drafts payable was due to a significant increase
in dollars processed from inflationary pressures and higher energy prices, among other factors.
The composition of average deposits and the average rates paid on those deposits is represented in the table entitled “Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity; Interest Rate and Interest Differential” which is included earlier in this discussion. The Company does not have any significant
deposits from foreign depositors.
Maturities of Certificates of Deposit as of December 31, 2022
(In thousands)
Three months or less
Three to six months
Six to twelve months
Over twelve months
Total
Liquidity
$100 or Less
$100 to Less
Than $250
$250 or
More
Total
$
$
789 $
249
756
732
2,526 $
10,230 $
704
7,503
1,700
20,137 $
5,281 $
9,312
3,101
264
17,958 $
16,300
10,265
11,360
2,696
40,621
The discipline of liquidity management as practiced by the Company seeks to ensure that funds are available to fulfill all payment obligations relating to
invoices processed as they become due and meet depositor withdrawal requests and borrower credit demands while at the same time maximizing
profitability. This is accomplished by balancing changes in demand for funds with changes in supply of funds. Primary liquidity to meet demand is
provided by short-term liquid assets that can be converted to cash, maturing securities and the ability to obtain funds from external sources. The Company's
Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) has direct oversight responsibility for the Company's liquidity position and profile. Management considers both on-
balance sheet and off-balance sheet items in its evaluation of liquidity.
The balances of liquid assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other financial
institutions, federal funds sold, and money market funds, totaled $200.9 million at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $314.0 million, or 61.0%, from
December 31, 2021. The decrease during 2022 is primarily attributed to available cash being used for purchases of available-for-sale investment securities
and to fund loan growth. At December 31, 2022, cash and cash equivalents represented 7.8% of total assets and are the Company’s and its subsidiaries’
primary source of liquidity to meet future expected and unexpected loan demand, depositor withdrawals or reductions in accounts and drafts payable.
Secondary sources of liquidity include the investment portfolio and borrowing lines. Total investment securities available-for-sale at fair value were
$754.5 million at December 31, 2022, an increase of $81.0 million, or 12.0%, from December 31, 2021. Investment securities represented 29.3% of total
assets at December 31, 2022. Of the total portfolio, 8.8% mature in one year or less, 34.6% mature after one year through five years and 56.6% mature after
five years.
As of December 31, 2022, the Bank had unsecured lines of credit at six correspondent banks to purchase federal funds up to a maximum of $83.0 million in
aggregate. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank had secured lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $237.8 million collateralized by
commercial mortgage loans. At December 31, 2022, the Company had lines of credit from three banks up to a maximum of $200.0 million in aggregate
collateralized by state and political subdivision securities. There were no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2022, and 2021 under any of the lines of
credit.
The deposits of the Company's banking subsidiary have historically been stable, consisting of a sizable volume of core deposits related to customers that
utilize many other commercial products of the Bank. The accounts and drafts payable generated by the Company have also historically been a stable source
of funds.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the years 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $51.6 million, $34.5 million, and $47.8 million, respectively. Net
income plus depreciation and amortization accounts for most of the operating cash
31
Table of Contents
provided. Net cash flows from investing and financing activities fluctuate greatly as the Company actively manages its investment and loan portfolios and
customer activity influences changes in deposit and accounts and drafts payable balances. Further analysis of the changes in these account balances is
discussed earlier in this report. Due to the daily fluctuations in these account balances, management believes that the analysis of changes in average
balances, also discussed earlier in this report, can be more indicative of underlying activity than the period-end balances used in the statements of cash
flows. Management anticipates that cash and cash equivalents, maturing investments, cash from operations, and borrowing lines will continue to be
sufficient to fund the Company’s operations and capital expenditures in 2023. The Company anticipates the annual capital expenditures for 2023 should
range from $8 million to $10 million. Capital expenditures in 2023 are expected to consist of equipment and software related to the payment and
information processing services business.
Net income plus amortization of intangible assets, net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities and depreciation of premises and
equipment was $45.9 million and $41.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, an increase of $4.8 million year over year.
The increase was due to the increase in net income of $6.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in net amortization of premium/discount on investment
securities of $1.1 million. The net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities is dependent on the type of securities purchased and changes
in the prevailing market interest rate environment.
Other factors impacting the $17.1 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities include:
• An increase in other operating activities, net of $9.4 million, primarily due to changes in various accounts receivable and payable;
• An increase in stock-based compensation expense of $3.9 million due to improved Company earnings and the impact on performance based stock;
and
• A change in the provision for (release of) credit losses of $1.5 million due to loan growth in 2022.
On an overall basis, the Company's $17.1 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities was due to improved revenue and profitability
largely due to higher financial fee revenue and net interest income. The improved revenue and profitability for 2022 is in large part due to a 33.7% increase
in financial fees and 32.8% increase in net interest income. Financial fees increased as a result of an increase in total invoice dollars processed and paid and
a higher interest rate environment as compared to the prior year. Transportation and facility invoice dollars processed and paid increased 21.5% and 23.0%,
respectively. The significant increase in dollars processed and paid was due to inflationary pressures and higher energy prices, among other factors. The
increase in net interest income in 2022 compared to 2021 is primarily due to the Federal Reserve’s actions to increase the Federal Funds rate throughout the
year of 2022, positively affecting the net interest rate margin which increased to 2.74% as compared to 2.31% in the prior year. Additionally, a 10.3%
increase in average earning assets contributed to the increase in net interest income.
The Company generated net cash provided by operating activities of $34.5 million and $47.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020,
respectively, a decrease of $13.2 million.
Net income plus amortization of intangible assets, net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities and depreciation of premises and
equipment was $41.1 million and $36.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, an increase of $4.7 million. The increase
was largely due to the increase in net income of $3.4 million in addition to an increase in net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities of
$1.4 million primarily resulting from the purchase of $494.2 million of securities available-for-sale in 2021, typically at a premium given the prevailing
low interest rate environment.
Other factors impacting the $13.2 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities include:
• An increase in the change in the pension liability of $6.2 million primarily due to the investment performance of the pension assets and changes in
other actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate;
• A change in other operating activities, net, of $10.1 million primarily due to a $5.0 million change associated with payroll taxes deferred under the
CARES Act in 2020 that were paid in 2021, and the receipt of PPP fees from the SBA in 2020 that were recognized into interest income in 2021
resulting in a $3.6 million change; partially offset by:
◦ An increase in stock-based compensation expense of $592,000 due to an increase in the fair value of restricted stock grants to personnel
and improved company performance; and
◦ A change in the (release of) provision for credit losses of $940,000 due to improved credit quality.
32
Table of Contents
On an overall basis, despite the $13.2 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities, the Company generated a higher level of cash from
operating activities in 2021 due to improved revenue and profitability, partially offset by an increase in the negative impact of noncash items. The improved
revenue and profitability for 2021 is in large part due to a 38.9% increase in dollars processed in transportation due to supply chain disruptions, fuel
surcharges, and scarcity of carrier supply experienced throughout the market generally in 2021, among other factors.
There are several trends and uncertainties that may impact the Company’s ability to generate revenues and income at the levels that it has in the past. In
addition, these trends and uncertainties may impact available liquidity. Those that could significantly impact the Company include the general levels of
interest rates, business activity, inflation, and energy costs as well as new business opportunities available to the Company.
As a financial institution, a significant source of the Company’s earnings is generated from net interest income. Therefore, the prevailing interest rate
environment is important to the Company’s performance. A major portion of the Company’s funding sources are the noninterest-bearing accounts and
drafts payable generated from its payment and information processing services. Accordingly, higher levels of interest rates will generally allow the
Company to earn more net interest income. Conversely, a lower interest rate environment will generally tend to depress net interest income. The Company
actively manages its balance sheet in an effort to maximize net interest income as the interest rate environment changes. This balance sheet management
impacts the mix of earning assets maintained by the Company at any point in time. For example, in a low interest rate environment, short-term relatively
lower rate liquid investments may be reduced in favor of longer term relatively higher yielding investments and loans. If the primary source of liquidity is
reduced in a low interest rate environment, a greater reliance would be placed on secondary sources of liquidity including borrowing lines, the ability of the
Bank to generate deposits, and the investment portfolio to ensure overall liquidity remains at acceptable levels.
The overall level of economic activity can have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to generate revenues and income, as the volume and size of
customer invoices processed may increase or decrease. Lower levels of economic activity decrease both fee income (as fewer invoices are processed) and
balances of accounts and drafts payable generated (as fewer invoices are processed) from the Company’s transportation customers.
The relative level of energy costs can impact the Company’s earnings and available liquidity. Lower levels of energy costs will tend to decrease
transportation and energy invoice amounts resulting in a corresponding decrease in accounts and drafts payable. Decreases in accounts and drafts payable
generate lower interest income and reduce liquidity.
New business opportunities are an important component of the Company’s strategy to grow earnings and improve performance. Generating new customers
allows the Company to leverage existing systems and facilities and grow revenues faster than expenses. During 2022, new business was added in both the
transportation and facility expense management operations, driven by both successful marketing efforts and the solid market leadership position held by
Cass.
Capital Resources
One of management’s primary objectives is to maintain a strong capital base to warrant the confidence of customers, shareholders, and bank regulatory
agencies. A strong capital base is needed to take advantage of profitable growth opportunities that arise and to provide assurance to depositors and
creditors. The Company and its banking subsidiary continue to exceed all regulatory capital requirements, as evidenced by the capital ratios at
December 31, 2022 as shown in Item 8, Note 2 of this report.
Cash dividends paid were $15.4 million in each of 2022 and 2021.
Shareholders’ equity was $206.3 million, or 8.0% of total assets, at December 31, 2022, a decrease of $39.5 million as compared to December 31, 2021.
The decrease was primarily a result of an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $59.8 million due to the change in market values on
investment securities as a result of the rising interest rate environment, the payment of cash dividends of $15.4 million, and the repurchase of treasury
shares of $5.3 million, partially offset by net income of $34.9 million.
Dividends from the Bank are a source of funds for payment of dividends by the Company to its shareholders. The only restrictions on dividends are those
dictated by regulatory capital requirements, state corporate laws and prudent and sound banking principles. During 2022, the Bank paid dividends of $15.0
million to the Company. As of December 31, 2022,
33
Table of Contents
unappropriated retained earnings of $29.2 million were available at the Bank for the declaration of dividends to the Company without prior approval from
regulatory authorities.
The Company maintains a treasury stock buyback program approved by the Board of Directors in October 2021 pursuant to which the Board of Directors
has authorized the repurchase of up to 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and has no expiration date. A total of 340,707 shares remain under
the buyback program at December 31, 2022.
The Company repurchased a total of 130,374 shares at an aggregate cost of $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 713,857 shares at an
aggregate cost of $31.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. A portion of the repurchased shares may be used for the Company’s employee
benefit plans, and the balance will be available for other general corporate purposes. The pace of future repurchase activity will depend on factors such as
levels of regulatory capital, cash generation from operations, cash requirements for investments, repayment of debt, current stock price, business and
market conditions, and other factors. The Company may repurchase shares from time to time on the open market or in private transactions, including
structured transactions. The stock repurchase program may be modified or discontinued at any time.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation could have the impact of increasing our operating expenses, such as compensation expense. Inflationary pressures may also have an impact on
total assets, earnings and capital, which could impact the Company's ability to grow. During 2021 and 2022, supply chain disruption, rising energy prices
and inflation, among other factors, had the impact of increasing the average balance of accounts and drafts payable and total assets. An increase in total
assets could have the impact of decreasing our regulatory capital ratios if earnings and total regulatory capital do not increase at the same rate.
As a result of rising inflation, the Federal Reserve has increased the Federal Funds rate over the course of 2022 and into the first quarter of 2023. The
increase in the Federal Funds rate has contributed to the increase in the Company's net interest margin to 2.74% in 2022 from 2.31% in 2021, therefore
positively impacting net interest income. There can be no assurance that further increases in the Federal Funds rate will occur, and the Company continues
to monitor such impact to its future levels of net interest income.
Commitments, Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Company is party to activities that involve credit, market and operational risk that are not reflected in whole or in part
in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Such activities include traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. The Company’s maximum potential
exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, commercial letters
of credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. At December 31, 2022, an allowance for unfunded
commitments of $232,000 had been recorded. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—
Provision and Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Commitments.”
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commercial
and standby letters of credit are commitments issued by the Company or its subsidiaries to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These
off-balance sheet financial instruments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. At
December 31, 2022, the balance of loan commitments, standby and commercial letters of credit were $237.0 million, $14.5 million and $354,000,
respectively. Since some of the financial instruments may expire without being drawn upon, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are subject to the same underwriting standards as those financial instruments included on
the consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if
deemed necessary upon extension of the credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally
accounts receivable, inventory, residential or income-producing commercial property or equipment. In the event of nonperformance, the Company or its
subsidiaries may obtain and liquidate the collateral to recover amounts paid under its guarantees on these financial instruments. See Note 14 "Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" for more information.
34
Table of Contents
During 2022, the Company did not make a contribution to its noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. In determining pension expense, the Company
makes several assumptions, including the discount rate and long-term rate of return on assets. These assumptions are determined at the beginning of the
plan year based on interest rate levels and financial market performance.
For 2022, these assumptions were as follows:
Assumption
Weighted average discount rate
Expected long-term rate of return on assets
Rate
2.85 %
6.00 %
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The Company faces market risk to the extent that its net interest income is affected by changes in market interest rates. The asset/liability management
discipline as applied by the Company seeks to limit the volatility, to the extent possible, that can result from changes in market interest rates. This is
accomplished by limiting the concentration of maturities of fixed rate investments, loans, and deposits; matching fixed rate assets and liabilities to the
extent possible; and optimizing the mix of fees and net interest income. However, the Company's asset/liability position often differs from other financial
holding companies with positive cumulative "gaps." This asset sensitive position is caused primarily by the operations of the Company, which generate
large balances of accounts and drafts payable. These balances, which are noninterest bearing, can cause the Company to become susceptible to changes in
interest rates, with a decreasing net interest margin in periods of declining interest rates and an increasing net interest margin in periods of rising interest
rates, like the Company is currently experiencing.
The Company’s ALCO measures the Company's interest rate risk sensitivity on a quarterly basis to monitor and manage the variability of earnings in
various interest rate environments. The ALCO evaluates the Company's risk position to determine whether the level of exposure is significant enough to
hedge a potential decline in earnings or whether the Company can safely increase risk to enhance returns. The ALCO uses gap reports, 12-month net
interest income simulations, and fair market value of equity analyses as its main analytical tools to provide management with insight into the Company's
exposure to changing interest rates.
Management uses a gap report to review any significant mismatch between the re-pricing points of the Company’s rate sensitive assets and liabilities in
certain time horizons. A negative gap indicates that more liabilities re-price in that particular time frame and, if rates rise, these liabilities will re-price
faster than the assets. A positive gap would indicate the opposite. Gap reports can be misleading in that they capture only the re-pricing timing within the
balance sheet and fail to capture other significant risks such as basis risk and embedded options risk. Basis risk involves the potential for the spread
relationship between rates to change under different rate environments and embedded options risk relates to the potential for the alteration of the level
and/or timing of cash flows given changes in rates.
Another measurement tool used by management is net interest income simulation, which forecasts net interest income during the coming 12 months under
different interest rate scenarios. Management has set policy limits specifying acceptable levels of interest rate risk given multiple simulated rate
movements. These simulations are more informative than gap reports because they are able to capture more of the dynamics within the balance sheet, such
as basis risk and embedded options risk. A table containing simulation results as of December 31, 2022, from an immediate and sustained parallel change
in interest rates in three varying scenarios is shown below.
While net interest income simulations do an adequate job of capturing interest rate risk to short term earnings, they do not capture risk within the current
balance sheet beyond 12 months. The Company uses fair market value of equity analyses to help identify longer-term risk that may reside on the current
balance sheet. The fair market value of equity is represented by the present value of all future income streams generated by the current balance sheet. The
Company measures the fair market value of equity as the net present value of all asset and liability cash flows discounted at forward rates suggested by the
current U.S. Treasury curve plus appropriate credit spreads. This representation of the change in the fair market value
35
Table of Contents
of equity under different rate scenarios gives insight into the magnitude of risk to future earnings due to rate changes. Management has set policy limits
relating to declines in the market value of equity.
The table below illustrates the projected impact of interest rate shocks on net interest income as of December 31, 2022:
Change in Interest Rates
+200 basis points
+100 basis points
-100 basis points
-200 basis points
% Change in Net Interest Income
10.6%
4.2
—
(1.5)
The Company is generally asset sensitive as average interest-earning assets of $2.21 billion for 2022 greatly exceeded average interest-bearing liabilities of
$603.3 million. The table above on the projected impact of interest rate shocks results from a static balance sheet at December 31, 2022. On an average
balance basis, the percent change in net interest income generally is higher to the positive for a rising interest rate environment and more negative for a
declining interest rate environment. Since the Company held fewer short-term investments ($179.9 million) on its ending balance sheet at December 31,
2022 than its average balance for full year 2022 of $425.0 million, the percent changes in net interest income are not necessarily representative of what
would occur in a changing interest rate environment as these short-term investments are floating rate assets. The Company's cash position can vary
significantly on a day to day basis.
36
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share and per share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Short-term investments
Cash and cash equivalents
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
Loans
Less allowance for credit losses
Loans, net
Payments in advance of funding
Premises and equipment, net
Investments in bank-owned life insurance
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Accounts and drafts receivable from customers
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Accounts and drafts payable
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.50 per share; 2,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued
Common stock, par value $0.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 15,505,772 shares issued at
December 31, 2022 and 2021; 13,669,656 and 13,734,295 shares outstanding at December 31, 2022 and 2021,
respectively.
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Common shares in treasury, at cost (1,836,116 shares at December 31, 2022 and 1,771,477 shares at
December 31, 2021, respectively)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
December 31,
2022
2021
20,995 $
179,947
200,942
754,468
1,082,906
13,539
1,069,367
293,775
19,958
47,998
17,309
4,126
95,779
69,301
2,573,023 $
642,757 $
614,460
1,257,217
1,067,600
41,881
2,366,698
12,301
502,627
514,928
673,453
960,567
12,041
948,526
291,427
18,113
43,176
14,262
2,564
4,992
43,460
2,554,901
582,642
638,861
1,221,503
1,050,396
37,204
2,309,103
—
—
7,753
207,422
131,682
(81,211)
(59,321)
206,325
2,573,023 $
7,753
204,276
112,220
(78,904)
453
245,798
2,554,901
$
$
$
$
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2022
Table of Contents
(In thousands except per share data)
Fee Revenue and Other Income:
Processing fees
Financial fees
Other
Total fee revenue and other income
Interest Income:
Interest and fees on loans
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable
Exempt from federal income taxes
Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments
Total interest income
Interest Expense:
Interest on deposits
Interest on short-term borrowings
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for (release of) credit losses
Net interest income after provision for (release of) credit losses
Total net revenue
Operating Expense:
Personnel
Occupancy
Equipment
Amortization of intangible assets
Other operating
Total operating expense
Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense
Net income
Basic Earnings Per Share
Diluted Earnings Per Share
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
$
$
$
76,470 $
43,757
4,755
124,982
74,589 $
32,733
2,369
109,691
39,460
10,083
6,354
6,429
62,326
3,482
—
3,482
58,844
1,350
57,494
182,476
106,474
3,676
6,668
680
22,078
139,576
42,900
7,996
34,904 $
35,178
2,547
7,046
726
45,497
1,171
—
1,171
44,326
(130)
44,456
154,147
92,155
3,824
6,745
859
16,743
120,326
33,821
5,217
28,604 $
2.58 $
2.53
2.03 $
2.00
74,638
23,107
2,696
100,441
37,665
1,692
7,104
1,226
47,687
2,360
2
2,362
45,325
810
44,515
144,956
88,062
3,739
6,568
859
15,387
114,615
30,341
5,165
25,176
1.75
1.73
Table of Contents
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Comprehensive Income:
Net income
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available-for-sale
Tax effect
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income
Tax effect
FASB ASC 715 pension adjustment
Tax effect
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Total comprehensive (loss) income
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2022
$
34,904 $
28,604 $
25,176
(79,746)
18,981
(15)
3
1,504
(358)
(143)
(59,774)
(24,870) $
(10,447)
2,487
(51)
12
11,363
(2,705)
(191)
468
29,072 $
6,689
(1,592)
(1,075)
256
12,548
(2,987)
66
13,905
39,081
$
Table of Contents
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of intangible assets
Net amortization of premium/discount on investment securities
Depreciation
Gains on sales of securities
Stock-based compensation expense
Provision for (release of) credit losses
Deferred income tax benefit
Increase in current income tax liability
(Decrease) increase in pension liability
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
Other operating activities, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
Net increase in loans
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
(Increase) decrease in payments in advance of funding
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
Asset acquisition of TouchPoint
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits
Net (decrease) increase in interest-bearing demand and savings deposits
Net decrease in time deposits
Net (increase) decrease in accounts and drafts receivable from customers
Net increase in accounts and drafts payable
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
Cash dividends paid
Purchase of common shares for treasury
Other financing activities, net
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Supplemental information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2022
$
34,904 $
28,604 $
680
6,275
4,021
(15)
6,732
1,350
(1,163)
724
(2,484)
(2,520)
3,104
51,608
3,838
61,209
(232,083)
(122,326)
(4,000)
(2,348)
(5,866)
(4,814)
(306,390)
60,115
(17,838)
(6,563)
(90,787)
17,204
—
(15,442)
(5,299)
(594)
(59,204)
(313,986)
514,928
200,942 $
859
7,328
4,313
(51)
2,859
(130)
(698)
206
(1,811)
(602)
(6,330)
34,547
63,774
96,951
(494,226)
(68,664)
(25,119)
(96,864)
(4,369)
—
(528,517)
89,138
90,310
(8,801)
6
215,010
—
(15,446)
(30,997)
(850)
338,370
(155,600)
670,528
514,928 $
3,431 $
8,396
1,194 $
5,637
$
$
40
25,176
859
5,939
4,471
(1,075)
2,267
810
(874)
1,237
4,423
756
3,792
47,781
21,943
63,789
(20,043)
(119,183)
—
11,595
(2,001)
—
(43,900)
142,413
166,289
(14,982)
59,404
151,091
(18,000)
(15,599)
(6,825)
(1,098)
462,693
466,574
203,954
670,528
2,426
4,732
Table of Contents
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands except per share data)
Balance, December 31, 2019
Cumulative effect of accounting change
(ASU 2016-13), net of tax
Balance, January 1, 2020
$
$
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
7,753 $
205,397 $
90,341 $
(45,381) $
(13,920) $
244,190
7,753 $
$
205,397 $
(856)
89,485 $
(45,381) $
$
(13,920) $
Net income
Cash dividends ($1.08 per share)
Issuance of 72,448 common shares
pursuant to stock-based compensation
plan, net
Exercise of SARs
Stock-based compensation expense
Purchase of 162,901 common shares
Other comprehensive income
Balance, December 31, 2020
Net income
Cash dividends ($1.09 per share)
Issuance of 85,056 common shares
pursuant to stock-based compensation
plan, net
Exercise of SARs
Stock-based compensation expense
Purchase of 713,857 common shares
Other comprehensive income
Balance, December 31, 2021
Net income
Cash dividends ($1.13 per share)
Issuance of 82,172 common shares
pursuant to stock-based compensation
plan, net
Exercise of SARs
Stock-based compensation expense
Purchase of 130,374 common shares
Other comprehensive loss
Balance, December 31, 2022
25,176
(15,599)
(2,546)
(243)
2,267
1,550
141
(6,825)
$
7,753 $
204,875 $
99,062 $
(50,515) $
28,604
(15,446)
(2,939)
(519)
2,859
2,249
359
(30,997)
$
7,753 $
204,276 $
112,220 $
(78,904) $
13,905
(15) $
468
453 $
34,904
(15,442)
(2,727)
(859)
6,732
2,414
578
(5,299)
$
7,753 $
207,422 $
131,682 $
(81,211) $
(59,774)
(59,321) $
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
(856)
243,334
25,176
(15,599)
(996)
(102)
2,267
(6,825)
13,905
261,160
28,604
(15,446)
(690)
(160)
2,859
(30,997)
468
245,798
34,904
(15,442)
(313)
(281)
6,732
(5,299)
(59,774)
206,325
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Operations The Company provides payment and information services, which include processing and payment of transportation, energy,
telecommunications and environmental invoices. These services include the acquisition and management of data, information delivery and financial
exchange. The consolidated balance sheet captions, “Accounts and drafts payable” and “Payments in advance of funding,” represent the Company’s
resulting financial position related to the payment services that are performed for customers. The Company also provides a full range of banking services to
individual, corporate and institutional customers through the Bank, its wholly owned bank subsidiary.
Basis of Presentation The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. GAAP. The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany transactions. Certain amounts in the
2021 and 2020 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2022 presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on
previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.
Use of Estimates In preparing the consolidated financial statements, Company management is required to make estimates and assumptions which
significantly affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers cash and due from banks, interest-bearing
deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds sold and other short-term investments to be cash and cash equivalents.
Investment in Debt Securities The Company classifies its investment securities as available-for-sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at
fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, are excluded from earnings and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, a
component of shareholders’ equity. Securities are periodically evaluated for credit losses in accordance with the guidance provided in FASB ASC Topic
326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses ("ASC 326").
For available for sale investment securities in an unrealized loss position, the entire loss in fair value is required to be recognized in current earnings if the
Company intends to sell the securities or believes it likely that it will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery. If neither condition is
met, and the Company does not expect to recover the amortized cost basis, the Company determines whether the decline in fair value resulted from credit
losses or other factors. If the assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is compared to the
amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss has
occurred, and an allowance for credit losses is recorded. The allowance for credit losses is limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the
amortized cost basis. Any impairment not recorded through the provision for credit losses would be recognized in other comprehensive income.
Changes in the allowance for credit losses would be recorded as a provision for credit losses on the consolidated statements of income. Losses would be
charged against the allowance for credit losses on securities when management believes the uncollectibility of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or
when either of the conditions regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted to interest income over the expected lives of the respective securities using the level-yield method.
Interest income is recognized when earned. Gains and losses are calculated using the specific identification method.
Loans Interest on loans is recognized based upon the principal amounts outstanding. It is the Company’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest when
there is reasonable doubt as to the collectability of principal or interest. Subsequent payments received on such loans are applied to principal if there is any
doubt as to the collectability of such principal; otherwise, these receipts are recorded as interest income. The accrual of interest on a loan is resumed when
the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest and/or the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. Loan origination and
commitment fees on originated loans, net of certain direct loan origination costs, are deferred and amortized to interest income using the level-yield method
over the estimated lives of the related loans.
42
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses The ACL is increased by provisions charged to expense and is available to absorb charge-offs, net of recoveries. Management
utilizes a systematic, documented approach in determining the appropriate level of the ACL. Management’s approach provides for estimated current
expected credit losses on loans in accordance with ASC 326. These estimates are based upon a number of factors, such as payment history, financial
condition of the borrower, expected future cash flows and collateral exposure.
The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are
charged off against the ACL when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Expected recoveries for amounts previously
charged off and expected to be charged off do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged off and expected to be charged off.
Management estimated the allowance balance using relevant available information from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current
conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts based on economic factors, such as GDP. Historical credit loss experience, of both the Company and
similar peer banks, provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for concentration
risk, asset quality trends, borrower’s ability to pay, collateral, and other environmental factors. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one
economic factor or input might affect the overall ACL because a wide variety of factors and inputs are considered in estimating the allowance and changes
in those factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all loan types. Additionally, changes in factors and
inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor may offset deterioration in others. The ACL is measured on a collective pool
basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Management believes the ACL is adequate to absorb expected losses in the loan portfolio.
Loans
The Company has identified the following portfolio segments:
Commercial & Industrial (“C&I”) – C&I loans consist of loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a wide variety of industries, franchise lending,
and equipment financing to companies of all sizes. These loans are generally collateralized by inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, and other
commercial assets, and may be supported by other credit enhancements such as personal guarantees. Risk arises primarily due to a difference between
expected and actual cash flows of the borrower. However, the recoverability of these loans is also dependent on other factors primarily dictated by the type
of collateral securing these loans. The fair value of the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate as market conditions change. Included within C&I are
revolving loans supported by borrowing bases that fluctuate depending on the amount of underlying collateral.
Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”) – CRE loans include various types of loans for which the Company holds real property as collateral. Commercial real
estate lending activity is typically restricted to owner-occupied properties or to investor properties that are owned by customers with a current banking
relationship. The primary risks of CRE loans include the borrower’s inability to pay and material decreases in the value of the real estate being held as
collateral.
Faith-based CRE – Faith-based CRE loans include loans to faith-based ministries for which the Company holds real property as collateral. The primary
risks of faith-based CRE loans include the borrower’s inability to pay and material decreases in the value of the real estate being held as collateral.
Construction and Land Development – The Company originates loans to finance construction projects including faith-based and commercial projects.
Construction loans are generally collateralized by first liens on the real estate and have floating interest rates. The primary risks of construction loans are
construction completion and timing risk. Adverse economic conditions may negatively impact the borrowers’ ability to complete the project. Additionally,
the fair value of the underlying collateral may fluctuate as market conditions change.
The ACL is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan portfolio and the projections from the weighted-average remaining
maturity ("WARM") model that the Company developed. The WARM model utilizes an attrition analysis, including events such as payoffs, matured loans,
and renewals in the borrowers’ control, to anticipate the length of time it would take for each portfolio segment to runoff. Management incorporates a one-
year GDP forecast and an immediate reversion to peer historical loss rates to determine the annual charge off rates over the estimated life of the loans. After
the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the model reverts to long-run historical average loss rates of its peers. However, for the faith-based CRE
ACL, beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period, loss rates are reverted immediately to the Company’s long-run historical averages, as this
represents a unique loan segment to the peer portfolios. The economic forecast is based on management’s assessment of the length and pattern of the
current economic
43
Table of Contents
cycle. The resulting annual charge off rate determined for each year in the WARM model is applied to the loan balances estimated in the attrition analysis.
Management accounts for the inherent uncertainty of the underlying economic forecast by reviewing forecast scenarios. Additionally, the ACL calculation
includes subjective adjustments for qualitative risk factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical experience. These
qualitative adjustments may increase or reduce reserve levels and include adjustments for lending management experience and risk tolerance, value of
underlying collateral, loan review and audit results, asset quality and portfolio trends, loan portfolio growth and loan concentrations. The Company has
elected to exclude accrued interest receivable ("AIR") from the allowance for credit losses calculation. When a loan is placed on non-accrual, any recorded
AIR is reversed against interest income.
The determination and application of the ACL accounting policy involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are subject to change. Changes in
these assumptions, estimates or the conditions surrounding them may have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity or results of
operations. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process, periodically review the ACL. Such agencies may require the
Company to recognize additions to the ACL or reserve increases to adversely graded classified loans based on information available to them at the time of
their examinations.
The ACL is decreased by net charge-offs and is increased by provisions for credit losses that are charged to the consolidated statements of operations.
Charge-offs, if any, are typically measured for each loan based on a thorough analysis of the most probable source of repayment, such as the present value
of the loan’s expected future cash flows, the loan’s estimated fair value, or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less costs of disposition for
collateral-dependent loans. When it is determined that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these amounts are charged off against the ACL.
Unfunded loan commitments
In addition to the ACL for funded loans, the Company maintains reserves to cover the risk of loss associated with off-balance sheet unfunded loan
commitments. The allowance for off-balance sheet credit losses is maintained within other liabilities in the statements of financial condition. Under the
CECL framework, adjustments to this liability are recorded as provision for credit losses in the consolidated statements of operations. Unfunded loan
commitment balances are evaluated by loan segment. In order to establish the required level of reserve, the Company applies average historical utilization
rates and ACL loan model loss rates for each loan segment to the outstanding unfunded commitment balances.
Investment securities
Management evaluates all investments in an unrealized loss position on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant
such evaluation. If the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security, the
security is written down to fair value and the entire loss is recorded in earnings. If either of the above criteria is not met, the Company will evaluate whether
the decline in fair value is the result of credit losses or other factors. In making the assessment, the Company may consider various factors including the
extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, performance on any underlying collateral, downgrades in the ratings of the security by a rating
agency, the failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments and adverse conditions specifically related to the security. If the
assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security
and any excess is recorded as an allowance for credit loss. For U.S. agency-backed securities where the risk of nonpayment of the amortized cost basis is
zero, the Company will not measure expected credit losses on these securities. When the loss is not considered a result of credit loss, the cost basis of the
security is written down to fair value, with the loss charge recognized in AOCI. Credit losses are not estimated for AIR from investment securities as
interest deemed uncollectible is written off through interest income.
Individually Evaluated Loans A loan is considered individually evaluated when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due, both
principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually evaluated loans are generally measured based on the expected
future cash flows and discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. Alternatively, reference to an observable market price could be used to individually
evaluate loans, if one exists, or the fair value of the collateral for a collateral-dependent loan. Regardless of the historical measurement method used, the
Company measures individually evaluated loans based on the fair value of the collateral when the Company determines foreclosure is probable.
Additionally, troubled debt restructurings are measured by discounting the total expected future cash flows at the loan's effective rate of interest as stated in
the original loan agreement. The Company uses its methods as discussed above for recognizing interest on individually evaluated loans.
44
Table of Contents
Foreclosed Assets Real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is generally
determined through the receipt of appraisals. Any write down to fair value at the time the property is acquired is recorded as a charge-off to the allowance
for credit losses. Any decline in the fair value of the property subsequent to acquisition is recorded as a charge to non-interest expense.
Premises and Equipment Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, or the respective lease terms for leasehold improvements, using straight-line and accelerated methods. Estimated useful
lives do not exceed 40 years for buildings, the lesser of 10 years or the life of the lease for leasehold improvements and range from 3 to 7 years for
software, equipment, furniture and fixtures. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Intangible Assets Cost in excess of fair value of net assets acquired has resulted from business acquisitions. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite
useful lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized on a straight-
line basis over their respective estimated useful lives.
Periodically, the Company reviews intangible assets for events or changes in circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not
be recoverable. Based on those reviews, adjustments of recorded amounts have not been required.
Non-marketable Equity Investments The Company accounts for non-marketable equity investments, in which it holds less than a 20% ownership, as
equity investments without readily determinable fair values. As a result, the carrying value of the investment is determined under the measurement
alternative of cost, less impairment (if any), adjusted for fair value changes when observable prices are available. The Company periodically evaluates for
impairment of these investments. In performing this evaluation, the Company considers various factors including the investee's financial condition, results
of operations, operating trends and other financial ratios. Non-marketable equity investments are included in other assets on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Treasury Stock Purchases of the Company’s common stock are recorded at cost. Upon reissuance, treasury stock is reduced based upon the average cost
basis of shares held.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and
pension liability adjustments and is presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of shareholders' equity and consolidated statements of
comprehensive income.
Processing Fees A majority of the Company’s fee revenue is attributable to providing services related to processing and payment of invoices. These
services include invoice processing, transportation invoice rating, payment processing and services, auditing, and the generation of accounting and
transportation information. The Company also processes, pays and generates management information from electric, gas, telecommunications,
environmental, and other invoices. The specific payment and information processing services provided to each customer are developed individually to meet
each customer’s specific requirements. The Company enters into service agreements with customers typically for fixed fees per transaction that are
invoiced monthly. Revenues are recognized in the period services are rendered and earned under the service agreements, as long as collection is reasonably
assured.
Financial fees The Company earns fees on a transaction level basis for invoice payment services when making customer payments. Fees are recognized at
the point in time when the payment transactions are made, which is when the performance obligation is satisfied.
Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced if necessary, by a
deferred tax asset valuation allowance. In the event that management determines it is more likely than not that it will not be able to realize all or part of net
deferred tax assets in the future, the Company adjusts the recorded value of deferred tax assets, which would result in a direct charge to income tax expense
in the period that such determination is made. Likewise, the Company will reverse the valuation allowance when realization of the deferred tax asset is
expected. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The
Company and its subsidiaries file U.S. federal and certain state income tax returns on a consolidated basis. In addition, certain state jurisdictions are filed
on a separate company basis by the Company or its subsidiaries.
45
Table of Contents
The Company recognizes and measures income tax benefits using a two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based
solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized; and 2) the benefit must be measured as the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely
than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized for a tax position in this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax
return is treated as an unrecognized tax benefit. The Company recognizes income tax related interest and penalties in income tax expense.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted
average number of potential common shares outstanding.
Stock-Based Compensation The Company follows FASB ASC 718, Accounting for Stock Options and Other Stock-based Compensation (“ASC 718”),
which requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the fair value of
the award. ASC 718 also requires that excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises and restricted stock awards be reflected as financing cash
inflows instead of operating cash inflows.
Pension Plans The amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements related to pension are determined from actuarial valuations. Inherent in
these valuations are assumptions including expected return on plan assets, discount rates at which the liabilities could be settled at December 31, 2022, rate
of increase in mortality rates. These assumptions are updated annually and are disclosed in Note 10. The Company follows FASB ASC 715, Compensation
– Retirement Benefits (“ASC 715”), which requires companies to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan
as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheet and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation as of
the date of its fiscal year-end.
Fair Value Measurements The Company follows the provisions of FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and outlines disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange
price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy for valuation techniques is used to measure financial
assets and financial liabilities at fair value. This hierarchy is based on whether the valuation inputs are observable or unobservable. Financial instrument
valuations are considered Level 1 when they are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 financial instrument
valuations use quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data. Financial instrument valuations are considered Level 3 when they are determined using pricing models, discounted
cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable, and when determination of the fair
value requires significant management judgment or estimation. The Company records securities available for sale at their fair values on a recurring basis
using Level 2 valuations. Additionally, the Company records individually evaluated credits and other real estate owned at their fair value on a nonrecurring
basis. The nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or impairment write-downs of individual
assets.
Impact of New and Not Yet Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2022, the FASB issued 2022-02, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures
("ASU 2022-02"). This ASU eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings by creditors that have adopted the CECL methodology for
estimating allowances for credit losses and enhances the disclosure requirements for loan restructurings made with borrowers experiencing financial
difficulty. In addition, the amendments require a public business entity to disclose current period gross charge-offs for financing receivables and net
investment in leases by year of origination in the vintage disclosures. ASU 2022-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect implementation of this ASU to have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
Note 2
Capital Requirements and Regulatory Restrictions
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional
46
Table of Contents
discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and
certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of
total and Tier I capital and common equity Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes that as of
December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The Bank is also subject to the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. As of December 31, 2022, the most recent notification from the
regulatory agencies categorized the Bank as well-capitalized. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based,
common equity Tier I risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The Company has traditionally paid a quarterly cash dividend to its shareholders. Subsidiary dividends can be a significant source of funds for payment of
dividends by the Company to its shareholders. Banking regulations may limit the amount of dividends that may be paid. Approval by regulatory authorities
is required if the effect of dividends declared would cause the regulatory capital of the Bank to fall below specified minimum levels. Approval is also
required if dividends declared exceed the net profits for that year combined with the retained net profits for the preceding two years. Under the foregoing
dividend restrictions and while maintaining its “well capitalized” status, at December 31, 2022, unappropriated retained earnings of $29.2 million were
available at the Bank for the declaration of dividends to the Company without prior approval from regulatory authorities. In addition to regulatory
requirements and considerations, any payment of dividends in the future will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition and other factors
considered relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors.
There were no restricted funds on deposit used to meet regulatory reserve requirements at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
47
Table of Contents
The Company’s and the Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios are as follows:
(In thousands)
At December 31, 2022
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Tier I capital (to average assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
At December 31, 2021
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to risk-weighted
assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Tier I capital (to average assets)
Cass Information Systems, Inc.
Cass Commercial Bank
Note 3
Investment Securities
Actual
Capital
Requirements
Requirement to be
Well-Capitalized
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
$
257,313
186,075
13.52 % $
16.00
152,306
93,044
8.00 %
8.00
$ N/A
116,305
N/A %
10.00
243,774
172,848
243,774
172,848
243,774
172,848
12.80
14.86
12.80
14.86
9.52
10.77
85,672
52,337
114,229
69,783
102,386
64,196
4.50
4.50
6.00
6.00
4.00
4.00
N/A
75,598
N/A
93,044
N/A
80,245
N/A
6.50
N/A
8.00
N/A
5.00
$
240,265
174,614
14.86 % $
17.21
129,339
81,163
8.00 %
8.00
$ N/A
101,454
N/A %
10.00
228,224
163,030
228,224
163,030
228,224
163,030
14.11
16.07
14.11
16.07
9.21
11.05
72,764
45,654
97,019
60,872
99,163
59,036
4.50
4.50
6.00
6.00
4.00
4.00
N/A
65,945
N/A
81,163
N/A
73,795
N/A
6.50
N/A
8.00
N/A
5.00
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s investment securities available-for-sale at
December 31, 2022 and 2021 are measured at fair value using Level 2 valuations. The market evaluation utilizes several sources which include “observable
inputs” rather than “significant unobservable inputs” and therefore falls into the Level 2 category. The table below presents the balances of securities
available-for-sale
48
Table of Contents
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of debt and equity securities
are summarized as follows:
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies or sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Treasury securities
Asset backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government
agencies or sponsored enterprises
Total
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S.
government agencies or sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Asset backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies or sponsored enterprises
Total
The fair values of securities with unrealized losses are as follows:
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2022
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
317,376 $
54 $
(22,304) $
295,126
205,175
96,348
158,935
47,213
825,047 $
—
—
—
—
54 $
(31,236)
(11,251)
(3,652)
(2,190)
(70,633) $
173,939
85,097
155,283
45,023
754,468
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2021
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
359,187 $
12,931 $
(990) $
371,128
170,711
84,538
49,835
664,271 $
135
72
—
13,138 $
(2,200)
(272) $
(494)
(3,956) $
168,646
84,338
49,341
673,453
$
$
$
$
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. government agencies
or sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Treasury securities
Asset backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies
or sponsored enterprises
Less than 12 months
December 31, 2022
12 months or more
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
214,919 $
8,958 $
47,474 $
13,346 $
262,393 $
22,304
53,732
32,517
155,283
6,135
3,629
3,652
118,017
47,580
—
25,101
7,622
—
171,749
80,097
155,283
—
—
47,213
2,190
47,213
31,236
11,251
3,652
2,190
70,633
Total
$
456,451 $
22,374 $
260,284 $
48,259 $
716,735 $
49
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
State and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. government
agencies or sponsored enterprises
Corporate bonds
Asset backed securities issued or
guaranteed by U.S. Government
agencies or sponsored enterprises
Total
Less than 12 months
December 31, 2021
12 months or more
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
60,083 $
990 $
—
$
— $
60,083 $
990
163,652
55,120
2,200
272
49,341
494
$
328,196 $
3,956 $
—
— —
—
—
$
—
—
163,652
55,120
—
— $
49,341
328,196 $
2,200
272
494
3,956
There were 311 securities, or 91.7%, in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2022 compared to 101 securities, or 28.0%, in an unrealized loss
position as of December 31, 2021. Of these securities, 101, or 29.8%, were in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months at December 31, 2022.
The Company does not intend to sell, or believe it is likely to sell, its available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position before the anticipated
recovery of current unrealized losses. As such, the Company did not recognize any credit losses on any available for sale debt securities in 2022 or 2021.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt and equity securities by contractual maturity are shown in the following table. Expected maturities may differ
from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
(In thousands)
Due in 1 year or less
Due after 1 year through 5 years
Due after 5 years through 10 years
Due after 10 years
Total
December 31, 2022
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
$
$
65,686 $
267,163
232,235
259,963
825,047 $
65,221
261,764
205,277
222,206
754,468
The premium related to the purchase of state and political subdivisions was $5.8 million and $6.4 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
There were no securities pledged to secure public deposits or for other purposes at December 31, 2022.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities classified as available-for-sale were $3.8 million in 2022, $63.8 million in 2021, and $21.9 million in 2020.
Gross realized gains on the sales in 2022, 2021, and 2020 were $15,000, $55,000, and $1.1 million, respectively. Gross realized losses on the sales in 2022,
2021, and 2020 were $0, $4,000 and $0, respectively.
Note 4
Loans
The Company originates commercial, industrial and real estate loans to businesses and faith-based ministries throughout the metropolitan St. Louis,
Missouri area, Colorado Springs, Colorado and other selected cities in the United States. The Company does not have any particular concentration of credit
in any one economic sector; however, a substantial portion of the commercial and industrial loans is extended to privately-held commercial companies and
franchises in these market areas and are generally secured by the assets of the business. The Company also has a substantial portion of real estate loans
secured by mortgages that are extended to faith-based ministries in its market area and selected cities in the United States.
50
Table of Contents
A summary of loan categories is as follows:
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate:
Commercial:
Mortgage
Construction
Faith-based:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total loans
December 31,
2022
2021
$
561,616 $
450,336
108,166
17,874
387,114
8,094
—
42
$
1,082,906 $
108,759
24,797
355,582
14,664
6,299
130
960,567
The following table presents the aging of loans by loan categories at December 31, 2022:
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Commercial:
Mortgage
Construction
Faith-based:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total
Performing
Nonperforming
Current
30-59
Days
60-89
Days
90 Days
and
Over
Non-
accrual
Total
Loans
$
560,466 $
— $
— $
— $
1,150 $
561,616
108,166
17,874
387,114
8,094
—
42
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
108,166
17,874
387,114
8,094
—
42
$
1,081,756 $
— $
— $
— $
1,150 $
1,082,906
51
Table of Contents
The following table presents the aging of loans by loan categories at December 31, 2021:
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Commercial:
Mortgage
Construction
Faith-based:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total
Performing
Nonperforming
Current
30-59
Days
60-89
Days
90 Days
and
Over
Non-
accrual
Total
Loans
$
450,336 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
450,336
108,759
24,797
355,582
14,664
6,299
130
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
960,567 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
108,759
24,797
355,582
14,664
6,299
130
960,567
The following table presents the credit exposure of the loan portfolio by internally assigned credit grade as of December 31, 2022:
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Commercial:
Mortgage
Construction
Faith-based:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total
(1)
(2)
Loans
Subject to
Normal
Monitoring
(1)
Performing
Loans Subject to
Special
Monitoring
(2)
Nonperforming
Loans Subject
to Special
Monitoring
(2)
Total Loans
$
549,241 $
11,225 $
1,150 $
561,616
108,166
17,874
386,169
8,094
—
42
—
—
945
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
108,166
17,874
387,114
8,094
—
42
$
1,069,586 $
12,170 $
1,150 $
1,082,906
Loans subject to normal monitoring involve borrowers of acceptable-to-strong credit quality and risk and have the apparent ability to satisfy
their loan obligation.
Loans subject to special monitoring possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness which requires a higher level of management
attention.
The Company had one loan that was considered an individually evaluated credit at December 31, 2022, with no specific allowance. This loan was paid off
in full in January 2023.
52
Table of Contents
The following table presents the credit exposure of the loan portfolio by internally assigned credit grade as of December 31, 2021:
Loans
Subject to
Normal
Monitoring
(1)
Performing
Loans Subject to
Special
Monitoring
(2)
Nonperforming
Loans Subject
to Special
Monitoring
(2)
Total Loans
$
440,607 $
9,729 $
— $
450,336
108,759
24,797
352,717
14,664
6,299
130
—
—
2,865
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
947,973 $
12,594 $
— $
108,759
24,797
355,582
14,664
6,299
130
960,567
(In thousands)
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Commercial:
Mortgage
Construction
Faith-based:
Mortgage
Construction
PPP
Other
Total
(1)
(2)
Loans subject to normal monitoring involve borrowers of acceptable-to-strong credit quality and risk and have the apparent ability to satisfy
their loan obligation.
Loans subject to special monitoring possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness which requires a higher level of management
attention.
The Company had no loans that were considered individually evaluated credits at December 31, 2021.
There were no loan modifications considered as troubled debt restructurings during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
A summary of the ACL by category for the period ended December 31, 2022 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses on loans:
Balance at December 31, 2021
Provision for (release of) credit losses
Recoveries
(1)
Balance at December 31, 2022
C&I
CRE
Faith-based
CRE
Construction
Total
$
$
5,034 $
931
13
5,978 $
1,031 $
(91)
—
940 $
5,684 $
753
—
6,437 $
292 $
(108)
—
184 $
12,041
1,485
13
13,539
(1)
For the period ended December 31, 2022, there was a release of credit losses of $135,000 for unfunded commitments.
53
Table of Contents
A summary of the ACL by category for the period ended December 31, 2021 is as follows:
(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses on loans:
Balance at January 1, 2020
Provision for (release of) credit losses
Recoveries
(1)
Balance at December 31, 2021
C&I
CRE
Faith-based
CRE
Construction
Total
$
$
4,635 $
387
12
5,034 $
1,175 $
(144)
—
1,031 $
5,717 $
(48)
15
5,684 $
417 $
(125)
—
292 $
11,944
70
27
12,041
(1)
For the period ended December 31, 2021, there was a release of credit losses of $200,000 for unfunded commitments.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no loans to executive officers or directors, or their affiliates.
Note 5
Premises and Equipment
A summary of premises and equipment is as follows:
(In thousands)
Land
Buildings
Leasehold improvements
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Purchased software
Internally developed software
Total
Less accumulated depreciation
Total premises and equipment, net
December 31,
2022
2021
$
873 $
14,903
2,044
14,668
4,648
27,308
64,444
44,486
$
19,958 $
873
14,834
2,036
13,551
4,640
22,665
58,599
40,486
18,113
Total depreciation charged to expense in 2022, 2021 and 2020 amounted to $4.0 million, $4.3 million, and $4.5 million, respectively.
Note 6
Acquired Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for intangible assets in accordance with FASB ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which requires that intangibles
with indefinite useful lives be tested annually for impairment, or when management deems there is a triggering event, and those with finite useful lives be
amortized over their useful lives.
In June 2022, the Company acquired the assets of mobile church management software developer TouchPoint, a division of the Pursuant Group, Inc., and
recorded intangible assets of $5.3 million. Those intangible assets were valued at $3.0 million for goodwill, $1.7 million for the customer list, $368,000 for
software, and $183,000 for the trade name. The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years, starting in 2022. The intangible assets and financial
results of TouchPoint are included in the Information Services operating segment.
The purchase price of the acquisition consisted of cash considerations of $4.9 million and potential contingent consideration in the form of an earn out up
to $2.5 million. The Company valued the contingent earn out component at $389,000. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated on the
acquisition date as the present value of the expected future contingent payments which were determined using a Monte Carlo simulation. The contingent
consideration is based upon 4 years of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) subsequent to the acquisition date. The
Company and Pursuant Group, Inc. agreed to settle the contingent consideration at the determined fair
54
Table of Contents
value of $389,000 during the fourth quarter of 2022. As such, there is no contingent consideration related to TouchPoint going forward.
Details of the Company’s intangible assets are as follows:
(In thousands)
Assets eligible for amortization:
Customer lists
Patent
Software
Trade Name
Other
Unamortized intangible assets:
Goodwill
Total intangible assets
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2021
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
$
$
6,470 $
72
3,212
373
500
17,309
27,936 $
(4,561) $
(32)
(1,508)
(42)
(358)
—
(6,501) $
4,778 $
72
2,844
190
500
14,262
22,646 $
(4,341)
(28)
(1,104)
(22)
(325)
—
(5,820)
Customer lists are amortized over 7 to 10 years; patents over 18 years, software over 3 years to 7 years, trade name over 10 years to 20 years and other
intangible assets over 15 years. Amortization of intangible assets amounted to $680,000 and $859,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021,
respectively. Estimated future amortization of intangibles is $780,000 in 2023, $738,000 in 2024, $730,000 in 2025, $582,000 in 2026, and $262,000 in
2027.
55
Table of Contents
Note 7
Interest-Bearing Deposits
Interest-bearing deposits consist of the following:
(In thousands)
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits:
Less than $100
$100 to less than $250
$250 or more
(1)
Total
Weighted average interest rate
December 31,
2022
2021
567,426
6,413
$
2,526
20,137
17,958
614,460
$
1.74 %
573,567
18,110
3,536
30,648
13,000
638,861
0.15 %
$
$
(1)
The scheduled maturities of time deposits not covered by deposit insurance consist of $17.7 million within one year and $264,000 within one to
three years.
Interest expense consists of the following:
(In thousands)
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Savings deposits
Time deposits:
Less than $100
$100 to less than $250
$250 or more
Total
The scheduled maturities of time deposits are summarized as follows:
2022
3,118 $
38
145
79
102
December 31,
2021
2020
582 $
9
332
109
139
3,482 $
1,171 $
1,313
24
550
206
267
2,360
$
$
(In thousands)
Due within:
One year
Two years
Three years
Four years
Five years
Total
December 31,
2022
2021
Amount
Percent
of Total
Amount
Percent
of Total
$
$
37,925
1,773
797
88
38
40,621
93.4 % $
4.4 %
2.0 %
0.2 %
0.1 %
100.0 % $
30,855
15,061
1,205
48
15
47,184
65.4 %
31.9 %
2.6 %
0.1 %
— %
100.0 %
56
Table of Contents
Note 8
Unused Available Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2022, the Bank had unsecured lines of credit at six correspondent banks to purchase federal funds up to a maximum of $83.0 million in
aggregate. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank had secured lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $237.8 million collateralized by
commercial mortgage loans. At December 31, 2022, the Company had lines of credit from three banks up to a maximum of $200.0 million in aggregate
collateralized by state and political subdivision securities. There were no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2022, and 2021 under any of the lines of
credit.
Note 9
Common Stock and Earnings per Share
The table below shows activity in the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock during 2022.
Shares outstanding at January 1
Issuance of common stock:
Employee restricted stock grants
Employee restricted stock units vested
Performance-based stock vested
Employee SARs exercised
Directors’ stock grants
Shares repurchased
Shares forfeited
Shares outstanding at December 31
2022
13,734,295
18,160
2,002
11,029
12,668
22,699
(130,374)
(823)
13,669,656
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is
computed by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted average number of potential
common shares outstanding. Under the treasury stock method, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) are dilutive when the average market price of the
Company’s common stock, combined with the effect of any unamortized compensation expense, exceeds the SAR price during a period.
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:
(In thousands except share and per share data)
2022
2021
2020
December 31,
Basic:
Net income
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic earnings per share
Diluted:
Net income
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive restricted stock, performance based restricted stock
(“PBRS”), and SARs
Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution
Diluted earnings per share
$
$
$
$
34,904 $
28,604 $
13,552,503
14,091,773
2.58 $
2.03 $
25,176
14,364,406
1.75
34,904 $
28,604 $
13,552,503
14,091,773
255,526
13,808,029
238,103
14,329,876
2.53 $
2.00 $
25,176
14,364,406
202,541
14,566,947
1.73
57
Table of Contents
Note 10
Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plan
The Company has a noncontributory defined-benefit pension plan (the “Plan”), which covers eligible employees. Effective December 31, 2016, the Plan
was closed to all new participants. Additionally, the Company froze the benefits of the Plan as of February 28, 2021. As such, subsequent to February 28,
2021, there is no service cost associated with the Plan.
A summary of the activity in the Plan’s projected benefit obligation, assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance
sheets is as follows:
(In thousands)
Projected benefit obligation:
Balance, January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial gain
Benefits paid
Balance, December 31
Plan assets:
Fair value, January 1
Actual investment return
Employer contribution
Expenses paid from plan assets
Benefits paid
Fair value, December 31
Funded status:
Accrued pension liability
2022
2021
117,323 $
—
3,293
(31,982)
(3,201)
85,433 $
114,136 $
(26,820)
—
(721)
(3,201)
83,394 $
122,035
1,002
3,076
(5,822)
(2,968)
117,323
106,667
10,107
330
—
(2,968)
114,136
(2,039)
(3,187)
$
$
$
$
$
The following represent the major assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligation of the Plan. For 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Plan’s expected
benefit cash flows were discounted using the FTSE Above Median Double-A Curve. For 2022, the Pri-2012 Mortality Table and MP-2022 Mortality
Improvement Scale were used. For 2021, the Pri-2012 Mortality Table and MP-2021 Mortality Improvement Scale were used. For 2020, the Pri-2012
Mortality Table and MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale were used.
Weighted average discount rate
Rate of increase in compensation levels
(a) 6.0% graded down to 3.25% over the first seven years of service.
2022
2021
2020
5.25 %
N/A
2.85 %
(a)
2.55 %
(a)
The accumulated benefit obligation was $85.4 million and $117.3 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company made no
contribution of during 2022, while in 2021 there was a contribution of $330,000 made to the Plan.
58
Table of Contents
The Company has not determined if it will make a contribution to the Plan in 2023. The following pension benefit payments, as appropriate, are expected
to be paid by the Plan:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2026-2030
$
Amount
4,193,000
4,436,000
4,636,000
4,844,000
5,048,000
27,845,000
The Plan’s (benefit) pension cost included the following components:
(In thousands)
Service cost – benefits earned during the year
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization and deferral
Net periodic (benefit) pension cost
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
$
— $
3,293
(5,857)
—
(2,564) $
1,002 $
3,076
(6,310)
393
(1,839) $
The following represent the major assumptions used to determine the net (benefit) pension cost of the Plan:
Weighted average discount rate
Rate of increase in compensation levels
Expected long-term rate of return on assets
(a) 6.0% graded down to 3.25% over the first seven years of service.
2022
2021
2020
2.85 %
N/A
6.00 %
2.55 %
(a )
6.00 %
4,329
3,908
(6,049)
1,946
4,134
3.30 %
(a )
6.50 %
For 2022, the Pri-2012 Mortality Table and the MP-2021 Mortality Improvement Table were used. For 2021, the Pri-2012 Mortality Table and the MP-
2020 Mortality Improvement Table were used. For 2020, the Pri-2012 Mortality Table and the MP-2019 Mortality Improvement Table were used.
The investment objective for the Plan is to maximize total return with a tolerance for average risk. Asset allocation is a balance between fixed income and
equity investments, with a target allocation of approximately 68.5% fixed income, 14.0% U.S. equity, 14.0% non-U.S. equity, and real estate 3.5%. Due to
volatility in the market, this target allocation is not always desirable and asset allocations can fluctuate between acceptable ranges. The fixed income
component is invested in pooled investment grade securities. The equity components are invested in pooled large cap, small/mid cap and non-U.S. stocks.
The expected one-year nominal returns and annual standard deviations are shown by asset class below:
Asset Class
% of Total Portfolio
One-Year Nominal
Return
Annual Standard
Deviation
Core Fixed Income
Large Cap U.S. Equities
International (Developed)
International (Emerging)
Real Estate
5.46 %
7.98 %
9.07 %
11.91 %
7.19 %
10.49 %
17.66 %
18.52 %
26.71 %
15.13 %
68.5 %
14.0 %
10.0 %
4.0 %
3.5 %
59
Table of Contents
Applying appropriate correlation factors between each of the asset classes the long-term rate of return on assets is estimated to be 6.00%.
A summary of the fair value measurements by type of asset is as follows:
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31,
2022
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Total
2021
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
566 $
—
— $
7,120
535 $
6,250
535 $
—
Total
$
566 $
7,120
2,055
7,822
8,319
3,000
51,756
—
2,756
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,055
7,822
8,319
3,000
51,756
—
2,756
4,734
19,164
18,279
7,701
51,386
—
6,087
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6,250
4,734
19,164
18,279
7,701
51,386
—
6,087
(In thousands)
Cash
Real estate investment trusts
Equity securities
U.S. Small/Mid Cap Growth
Non-U. S. Core
U.S. Large Cap Passive
Emerging Markets
Fixed Income
U.S. Core
U.S. Passive
Opportunistic
Total
$
83,394 $
566 $
82,828 $
114,136 $
535 $
113,601
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
The Company also has an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) which covers key executives of the Company whose benefits are
limited by the Internal Revenue Service under the Company’s qualified retirement plan. The SERP is a noncontributory plan in which the Company’s
subsidiaries make accruals designed to fund normal service costs on a current basis using the same method and criteria as the Plan.
A summary of the activity in the SERP’s projected benefit obligation and amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is as follows:
(In thousands)
Benefit obligation:
Balance, January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial gain
Balance, December 31
December 31,
2022
2021
$
$
12,420 $
—
318
(348)
(2,811)
9,579 $
13,412
147
291
(282)
(1,148)
12,420
60
Table of Contents
The following represent the major assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligation of the SERP. For 2022, 2021 and 2020, the SERP’s
expected benefit cash flows were discounted using the FTSE Above Median Double-A Curve.
Weighted average discount rate
Rate of increase in compensation levels
(a) 6.00% graded down to 3.25% over the first seven years of service.
2022
2021
2020
5.15 %
N/A
2.65 %
(a)
2.20 %
(a)
The accumulated benefit obligation was $9.6 million and $12.4 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Since this is an unfunded plan,
there are no plan assets. Benefits paid were $348,000 in 2022, $282,000 in 2021, and $291,000 in 2020. Expected future benefits payable by the Company
over the next ten years are as follows:
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2026-2030
Amount
810,000
791,000
788,000
785,000
780,000
3,787,000
$
$
Net periodic pension cost related to the SERP included the following components:
(In thousands)
Service cost – benefits earned during the year
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations
Net amortization and deferral
Net periodic pension cost
For the Year Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
$
— $
318
108
426 $
147 $
291
203
641 $
121
347
112
580
The pretax amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Prior service cost
Net actuarial loss (gain)
Total
The Plan
SERP
2022
2021
2022
2021
$
$
— $
6,833
6,833 $
— $
5,417
5,417 $
— $
(136)
(136) $
—
2,783
2,783
The estimated pretax prior service cost and net actuarial loss (gain) in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2022 expected to be
recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in 2023 for the Plan are each $0. The estimated pretax prior service cost and net actuarial loss in
accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2022 expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in 2023 for the SERP
are each $0.
The Company also maintains a noncontributory profit sharing program, which covers most of its employees. Employer contributions are calculated based
upon formulas which relate to current operating results and other factors. Profit sharing expense recognized in personnel expense in the consolidated
statements of income in 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $7.9 million, $6.4 million, and $5.7 million, respectively.
The Company also sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan to provide additional retirement benefits to substantially all employees. Contributions under
the 401(k) plan for 2022, 2021 and 2020 were $4.6 million, $3.5 million, and $1.5 million, respectively. In conjunction with the freezing of the Plan,
contribution rates to employees increased on March 1, 2021.
61
Table of Contents
Note 11
Stock-based Compensation
The Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock and Performance Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) provides incentive opportunities for key employees
and non-employee directors and to align the personal financial interests of such individuals with those of the Company’s shareholders. The Omnibus Plan
permits the issuance of up to 1.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock in the form of stock options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units
and performance awards.
Restricted Stock
Restricted shares granted to Company employees are amortized to expense over the three-year cliff vesting period. Restricted shares granted to members of
the Board of Directors are amortized to expense over a one-year service period, with the exception of those shares granted in lieu of cash payments for
retainer fees which are expensed in the period earned.
Changes in restricted shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2022 were as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2021
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2022
Shares
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
165,553 $
64,151 $
(23,316) $
(823) $
205,565 $
44.81
39.30
48.85
43.89
42.64
During 2021 and 2020, 53,906 and 38,226 shares, respectively, were granted with weighted average per share market values at date of grant of $41.55 in
2021 and $47.07 in 2020. The fair value of such shares are based on the market price on the date of grant. Amortization of restricted stock bonus awards
totaled $2.4 million for 2022, $1.8 million for 2021 and $1.5 million for 2020. As of December 31, 2022, the total unrecognized compensation expense
related to non-vested restricted stock awards was $1.4 million, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is
approximately 0.60 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $1.1 million, $1.2 million, and
$1.0 million, respectively.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock
The Company has granted three-year PBRS awards which are contingent upon the Company’s achievement of pre-established financial goals over a three-
year cliff vest period. The number of shares issued ranges from 0% to 150% of the target opportunity based on the actual achievement of financial goals for
the three-year performance period.
Following is a summary of the activity of the PBRS, based on 100% of target value, for the year ended December 31, 2022:
Balance at December 31, 2021
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2022
62
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares
116,543 $
57,542
(34,066)
(1,234)
138,785 $
46.79
39.58
49.05
43.89
43.19
Table of Contents
The PBRS that vested during the year ended December 31, 2022 achieved weighted average financial goals of 52.9% of target, resulting in the issuance of
18,021 shares of common stock. The PBRS that vested during the year ended December 31, 2021 achieved weighted average financial goals of 94.4% of
target, resulting in the issuance of 31,150 shares of common stock. The outstanding PBRS at December 31, 2022 will vest at scheduled vesting dates and
the actual number of shares of common stock issued will range from 0% to 150% of the target opportunity based on the actual achievement of financial
goals for the respective three-year performance period.
SARs
During 2022, there were no SARs granted and no expense recognized. As of December 31, 2022, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related
to SARs.
Changes in SARs outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2022 were as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2021
Exercised
Balance at December 31, 2022
Exercisable at December 31, 2022
SARs
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
117,089 $
(70,764)
46,325
46,325 $
34.91
30.52
41.62
41.62
The total intrinsic value of SARs exercised during 2022 and 2021 was $2.2 million and $630,000, respectively. The average remaining contractual term for
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2022 was 0.73 years, and the aggregate intrinsic value was $192,000. The average remaining contractual term for
SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2021 was 1.21 years, and the aggregate intrinsic value was $741,000.
The total compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements was $6.7 million, $2.9 million, and $2.3 million in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Note 12
Other Operating Expense
Details of other operating expense are as follows:
(In thousands)
Promotional expense
Outside service fees
Data processing services
Other
Total other operating expense
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
$
2,889 $
7,874
3,365
7,950
2,627 $
7,413
2,650
4,053
22,078 $
16,743 $
2,184
5,845
1,900
5,458
15,387
63
Table of Contents
Note 13
Income Taxes
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
(In thousands)
Current:
Federal
State
Deferred:
Federal
State
Total income tax expense
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
$
7,794 $
1,365
(990)
(173)
5,018 $
897
(608)
(90)
7,996 $
5,217 $
5,350
671
(636)
(220)
5,165
A reconciliation of expected income tax expense (benefit), computed by applying the effective federal statutory rate of 21% for each year to income before
income tax expense is as follows:
(In thousands)
Expected income tax expense
(Reductions) increases resulting from:
Tax-exempt income
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Share-based compensation adjustment
Federal tax credits
Other, net
Total income tax expense
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
9,035 $
7,103 $
6,385
(1,571)
942
258
(473)
(195)
(1,673)
638
92
(357)
(586)
7,996 $
5,217 $
(1,588)
356
70
(336)
278
5,165
$
$
Income tax expense in 2022 totaled $8.0 million compared to $5.2 million in 2021 and 2020. When measured as a percent of pre-tax income, the
Company’s effective tax rate was 18.6% in 2022, 15.4% in 2021, and 17.0% in 2020.
64
Table of Contents
The tax effects of temporary differences which give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for credit losses
ASC 715 pension funding liability
Supplemental executive retirement plan accrual
Stock compensation
Unrealized loss on investment securities available-for-sale
Research and development expenses
Lease liability
Other
(1)
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Premises and equipment
Pension
Intangible assets
Unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale
Right of use asset
Prepaid expenses
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax assets
December 31,
2022
2021
$
$
$
$
$
3,222 $
1,594
2,311
2,745
16,798
772
2,261
640
30,343 $
(1,710) $
(1,141)
(1,744)
—
(2,178)
(847)
(144)
(7,764) $
22,579 $
2,866
1,952
2,293
1,875
—
—
1,145
633
10,764
(2,235)
(531)
(1,493)
(2,185)
(1,032)
(479)
(18)
(7,973)
2,791
(1)
The deferred tax asset associated with the unrealized losses on securities is mainly a result of changes in interest rates, and the unrealized losses are considered to
be temporary as the fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their respective maturity dates. The issuers of the securities are of high credit
quality and all principal amounts are expected to be paid when the securities mature. The Company does not intend to sell and it is likely that the Company will
not be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery.
A valuation allowance would be provided on deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion of the assets will not be realized. The
Company has not established a valuation allowance at December 31, 2022 or 2021, due to management’s belief that it is more likely than not that the
deferred tax asset is realizable.
The reconciliation of the beginning unrecognized tax benefits balance to the ending balance is presented in the following table:
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1
2022
2021
2020
$
1,405 $
1,231 $
1,299
Changes in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during a prior
year
Changes in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax position taken during the
current year
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute
of limitations
Decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of settlements with taxing
authorities
(176)
222
(199)
—
165
239
(230)
—
Balance at December 31
$
1,252 $
1,405 $
62
233
(315)
(48)
1,231
65
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the balances of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits which would, if recognized, affect the Company’s
effective tax rate were $1,129,000, $1,134,000 and $1,096,000, respectively. These amounts are net of the offsetting benefits from other taxing
jurisdictions.
As of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company had $84,000, $85,000 and $114,000, respectively, in accrued interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits.
The Company believes it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $254,000 over the next
12 months. The reduction primarily relates to the anticipated lapse in the statute of limitations. The unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to
apportionment of taxable income among various state tax jurisdictions.
The Company is subject to income tax in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, numerous state jurisdictions, and a foreign jurisdiction. The Company’s federal
income tax returns for tax years 2019, 2020 and 2021 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the Company is subject
to state tax examinations for the tax years 2018 through 2021.
Note 14
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Following
is
a
summary
of
the
carrying
amounts
and
fair
values
of
the
Company’s
financial
instruments:
(In thousands)
Balance sheet assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans, net
Accrued interest receivable
Total
Balance sheet liabilities:
Deposits
Accounts and drafts payable
Accrued interest payable
Total
December 31,
2022
2021
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
200,942 $
754,468
1,069,367
8,297
2,033,074 $
200,942 $
754,468
1,004,682
8,297
1,968,389 $
514,928 $
673,453
948,526
6,799
2,143,706 $
1,257,217 $
1,067,600
66
2,324,883 $
1,257,217 $
1,067,600
66
2,324,883 $
1,221,503 $
1,050,396
16
2,271,915 $
514,928
673,453
948,701
6,799
2,143,881
1,221,503
1,050,396
16
2,271,915
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate
that value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Investment Securities The fair value is measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 valuations. Refer to Note 3 - Investment Securities, for fair value and
unrealized gains and losses by investment type.
Loans The fair value is estimated using present values of future cash flows discounted at risk-adjusted interest rates for each loan category designated by
management and is therefore a Level 3 valuation. Management believes that the risk factor embedded in the interest rates along with the allowance for
credit losses approximates a fair valuation.
Individually assessed loans are valued using the fair value of the collateral which is based upon an observable market price or current appraised value and
therefore, the fair value is a nonrecurring Level 3 valuation.
Accrued Interest Receivable The carrying amount approximates fair value.
66
Table of Contents
Deposits The fair value of demand deposits, savings deposits and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.
The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities and
therefore, is a Level 2 valuation. The fair value estimates above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit
liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market or the benefit derived from the customer relationship inherent in existing deposits.
Accounts and Drafts Payable The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Accrued Interest The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Limitations Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of
anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets or liabilities that are
not considered financial assets or liabilities include premises and equipment and the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit
liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market (core deposit intangible). In addition, tax ramifications related to the realization of the
unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
Note 15
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. The Company’s maximum
potential exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, commercial
letters of credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. At December 31, 2022, an allowance for
unfunded commitments of $232,000 had been recorded, as compared to $367,000 at December 31, 2021. See Note 1 "Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies" for information related to CECL.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commercial
and standby letters of credit are commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These off-balance sheet
financial instruments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The approximate remaining
terms of commercial and standby letters of credit range from less than one to five years. Since these financial instruments may expire without being drawn
upon, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit are subject to the same
underwriting standards as those financial instruments included on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit-
worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of the credit, is based on management’s credit
evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally accounts receivable, inventory, residential or income-producing commercial property or
equipment. In the event of nonperformance, the Company may obtain and liquidate the collateral to recover amounts paid under its guarantees on these
financial instruments.
The following table shows commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters:
(In thousands)
Commitments to extend credit
Standby letters of credit
Commercial letters of credit
December 31,
2022
2021
$
237,006 $
14,494
354
208,395
12,859
771
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements, the likelihood of the counterparties drawing on such financial instruments and the present credit
worthiness of such counterparties. The Company believes such commitments have been made at terms which are competitive in the markets in which it
operates; however, no premium or discount is offered thereon.
67
Table of Contents
The Company and its subsidiaries are not involved in any pending proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their businesses.
Management believes none of these proceedings, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business or financial condition of the
Company or its subsidiaries.
Note 16
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Revenue is recognized as the obligation to the customer is satisfied. The following is detail of the Company’s revenue from contracts with clients.
Processing fees – The Company earns fees on a per-item or monthly basis for the invoice processing services rendered on behalf of customers. Per-item
fees are recognized at the point in time when the performance obligation is satisfied. Monthly fees are earned over the course of a month, representing the
period over which the performance obligation is satisfied. The contracts have no significant impact of variable consideration and no significant financing
components.
Financial fees – The Company earns fees on a transaction level basis for invoice payment services when making customer payments. Fees are recognized
at the point in time when the payment transactions are made, which is when the performance obligation is satisfied. The contracts have no significant
impact of variable consideration and no significant financing components.
Bank service fees – Revenue from service fees consists of service charges and fees on deposit accounts under depository agreements with customers to
provide access to deposited funds. Service charges on deposit accounts are transaction-based fees that are recognized at the point in time when the
performance obligation is satisfied. Service charges are recognized on a monthly basis representing the period over which the performance obligation is
satisfied. The contracts have no significant impact of variable consideration and no significant financing components.
The following table presents non-interest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers ("ASC 606") for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
(In thousands)
Fee revenue and other income
In-scope of ASC 606
Processing fees
Financial fees
Information services payment and processing revenue
Bank service fees
Fee revenue (in-scope of ASC 606)
Other income (out-of-scope of ASC 606)
Total fee revenue and other income
Note 17
Industry Segment Information
For the Years Ended December 31,
2021
2020
2022
$
$
76,470 $
43,757
120,227
1,430
121,657
3,325
124,982 $
74,589 $
32,733
107,322
1,369
108,691
1,000
109,691 $
74,638
23,107
97,745
1,158
98,903
1,538
100,441
The services provided by the Company are classified into two reportable segments: Information Services and Banking Services. Each of these segments
provides distinct services that are marketed through different channels. They are managed separately due to their unique service and processing
requirements.
The Information Services segment provides transportation, energy, telecommunication, and environmental invoice processing and payment services to large
corporations. In addition, this segment provides church management software and on-line generosity services primarily for faith-based ministries. The
Banking Services segment provides banking services primarily to privately held businesses, franchise restaurants and faith-based ministries, as well as
supporting the banking needs of the Information Services segment.
The Company’s accounting policies for segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of this report. Management evaluates segment performance
based on tax-equivalized (as defined in the footnote to the chart on the following table) pre-
68
Table of Contents
tax income after allocations for corporate expenses. Transactions between segments are accounted for at what management believes to be fair value.
Substantially all revenue originates from, and all long-lived assets are located within the United States, and no revenue from any customer of any segment
exceeds 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenue.
Funding sources represent average balances and deposits generated by Information Services and Banking Services and there is no allocation methodology
used. Banking Services interest income is determined by actual interest income on loans minus actual interest expense paid on deposits plus/minus an
allocation for interest income or expense dependent on the remaining available liquidity of the segment. Information Services interest income is determined
by multiplying available liquidity by actual yields on short-term investments and investment securities.
Any difference between total segment interest income and overall total Company interest income is included in Corporate, Eliminations, and Other.
69
Table of Contents
Summarized information about the Company’s operations in each industry segment for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:
(In thousands)
2022
Fee income
Interest income*
Interest expense
Intersegment income (expense)
Tax-equivalized pre-tax income*
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Total assets
Average funding sources
2021
Fee income
Interest income*
Interest expense
Intersegment income (expense)
Tax-equivalized pre-tax income*
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Total assets
Average funding sources
2020
Fee income
Interest income*
Interest expense
Intersegment income (expense)
Tax-equivalized pre-tax income*
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net
Total assets
Average funding sources
Information
Services
Banking
Services
Corporate,
Eliminations
and Other
Total
$
$
$
120,234 $
28,528
166
(3,350)
26,478
17,173
4,126
1,595,939
1,379,355
106,678 $
24,332
—
(3,222)
25,446
14,126
2,564
1,450,594
1,150,493
97,640 $
20,343
—
(2,315)
16,230
14,126
3,423
1,188,745
902,486
3,606 $
40,913
4,143
3,350
21,566
136
—
1,182,439
953,346
1,405 $
24,732
1,171
3,222
11,004
136
—
1,090,626
876,018
1,515 $
29,494
2,362
2,315
14,973
136
—
997,483
737,962
1,142 $
(5,426)
(827)
—
(3,455)
—
—
(205,355)
—
1,608 $
(1,694)
—
—
(756)
—
—
13,681
—
1,286 $
(261)
—
—
1,027
—
—
17,007
—
124,982
64,015
3,482
—
44,589
17,309
4,126
2,573,023
2,332,701
109,691
47,370
1,171
—
35,694
14,262
2,564
2,554,901
2,026,511
100,441
49,576
2,362
—
32,230
14,262
3,423
2,203,235
1,640,448
*
Presented on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 21%. The tax-equivalent adjustment was approximately $1.7 million for 2022, $1.9 million
for 2021, and $1.9 million for 2020.
Note 18
Leases
The Company leases certain premises under operating leases. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had lease liabilities of $9.5 million and right-of-use
assets of $9.2 million. Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are reflected in other liabilities and other assets, respectively. Included in occupancy expense
on the consolidated statements of income for 2022 was operating lease cost of $1.5 million, short-term lease cost of $203,000, and there was no variable
lease cost. The Company paid cash of $1.6 million for operating lease amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the year ended
December 31, 2022. No right-of-use assets were obtained in exchange for lease liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2022.
70
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining lease term for the operating leases was 8.2 years and the weighted average
discount rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 3.6%. Certain of the Company’s leases contain options to renew the lease; however,
these renewal options are not included in the calculation of the lease liabilities as they are not reasonably certain to be exercised. The increase in the
Company’s expected future minimum lease payments since December 31, 2021 was a result of renewing the lease on the Company's corporate
headquarters for 10 years, effective September 2022.
A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and undiscounted cash flows as of December 31, 2022 was as follows:
(In thousands)
Lease payments due
Less than 1 year
1-2 years
2-3 years
3-4 years
4-5 years
Over 5 years
Total undiscounted cash flows
Discount on cash flows
Total lease liability
December 31,
2022
$
$
1,348
1,327
1,345
1,351
1,357
4,219
10,947
1,448
9,499
There were no sale and leaseback transactions, leveraged leases, or lease transactions with related parties during the year ended December 31, 2022. At
December 31, 2022, the Company did not have any leases that had not yet commenced.
Note 19
Subsequent Events
In accordance with FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events after the consolidated balance sheet date of
December 31, 2022, and there were no events identified that would require additional disclosures to prevent the Company’s consolidated financial
statements from being misleading.
71
Table of Contents
Note 20
Condensed Financial Information of Parent Company
Following are the condensed balance sheets of the Company (parent company only) and the related condensed statements of income and cash flows.
(In thousands)
Assets
Cash and due from banks
Short-term investments
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
Loans, net
Payments in advance of funding
Investments in subsidiaries
Premises and equipment, net
Accounts and drafts receivable from customers
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Accounts and drafts payable
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
(In thousands)
Income from subsidiaries – management fees
Processing fees
Financial fees
Other fees
Net interest income after provision for (release of) credit losses
Total revenue
Expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits
Other expenses
Total expenses
Income before income tax and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Income tax expense
Income before undistributed income of subsidiaries
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Net income
72
Condensed Balance Sheets
December 31,
2022
2021
$
5,081 $
26,834
490,829
74,810
293,775
164,907
19,525
95,779
119,627
132,050
585
566,835
40,515
291,427
164,650
17,443
4,992
90,948
$
$
$
1,291,167 $
1,309,445
1,057,463 $
27,379
1,084,842
206,325
1,291,167 $
1,041,070
22,577
1,063,647
245,798
1,309,445
Condensed Statements of Income
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
$
4,315 $
3,115 $
74,382
42,243
2,606
13,435
136,981
94,047
32,406
126,453
10,528
1,242
9,286
25,618
72,579
31,847
970
11,316
119,827
80,434
27,406
107,840
11,987
635
11,352
17,252
$
34,904 $
28,604 $
2,854
72,513
22,565
1,533
10,932
110,397
77,577
25,347
102,924
7,473
340
7,133
18,043
25,176
Table of Contents
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
$
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31,
2022
2021
2020
34,904 $
28,604 $
25,176
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
Net change in other assets
Net change in other liabilities
Stock-based compensation expense
Other, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease (increase) in securities
Net (increase) decrease in loans
Net (increase) decrease in payments in advance of funding
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
Purchases of premises and equipment, net
Asset acquisition of TouchPoint
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (increase) decrease in accounts and drafts receivable from customers
Net increase in accounts and drafts payable
Short-term borrowings
Cash dividends paid
Purchase of common shares for treasury
Other financing activities, net
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
(25,618)
(4,640)
6,462
6,732
25,412
43,252
3,064
(34,295)
(2,347)
(4,000)
(5,851)
(4,814)
(48,243)
(90,787)
16,393
—
(15,442)
(5,299)
(594)
(95,729)
(100,720)
132,635
(17,252)
(212)
(9,307)
2,859
20,921
25,613
(226,090)
8,799
(96,864)
(25,119)
(2,233)
—
(341,507)
6
208,650
—
(15,446)
(30,997)
(850)
161,363
(154,531)
287,166
$
31,915 $
132,635 $
73
(18,043)
6,054
(6,525)
2,267
18,236
27,165
65,689
(2,545)
11,595
—
(1,810)
—
72,929
59,404
148,935
(18,000)
(15,599)
(6,825)
(1,098)
166,817
266,911
20,255
287,166
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Cass Information Systems, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cass Information Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,
2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the
three‑year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated
financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not
alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below,
providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Assessment of the qualitative risk factors related to the allowance for credit losses on loans evaluated on a collective basis
As discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2022 was $13.5
million, of which $13.5 million was related to the allowance for credit losses on loans evaluated on a collective basis (the “collective ACL”). The
December 31, 2022 collective ACL includes the measure of expected credit losses on a collective (pooled) basis for those loans that share similar risk
characteristics. The Company estimated the collective ACL using a weighted-average remaining maturity (“WARM”) model that utilizes expected annual
remaining loan balance, historical loss rates, a reasonable and supportable forecast, and reversion adjustments. Additionally, the collective ACL includes
subjective qualitative risk factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical experience. Given the Company’s recent historical
loss experience, the impact of the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL is a substantial percentage of the overall collective ACL. These
qualitative risk
74
Table of Contents
factors may increase or reduce reserve levels and include adjustments for assumptions related to loan concentrations, lending management experience and
risk tolerance, loan review and audit results, asset quality and portfolio trends, value of underlying collateral, and loan portfolio growth.
We identified the assessment of the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including
specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment due to significant measurement uncertainty.
Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL methodology, including the conceptual
soundness and performance of the qualitative framework. The assessment also included the evaluation of qualitative risk factors and the related
assumptions. These qualitative risk factors and related assumptions are sensitive to variation, such that minor changes in the assumption can cause
significant changes in the estimates.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness
of certain internal controls related to the Company’s measurement of the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL estimate, including controls
over the:
•
•
•
•
development of the collective ACL methodology
identification and determination of the assumptions used in the qualitative framework
continued use and appropriateness of changes made to the qualitative framework
analysis of the collective ACL results, trends, and ratios
We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the qualitative risk factors related to the collective ACL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors,
and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit
risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
•
•
•
evaluating the Company’s collective ACL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
evaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the assessment of the qualitative framework by comparing it to relevant Company-specific
metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices
evaluating the qualitative framework used to develop the qualitative risk factors and the effect of those factors on the collective ACL compared
with relevant credit risk factors and consistency with credit trends and identified limitations of the underlying quantitative models.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1983.
St. Louis, Missouri
February 28, 2023
75
Table of Contents
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted
an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2022. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial
officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentations.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under this framework, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.
There have not been changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected or
are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered
public accounting firm. KPMG LLP’s report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2022, is included below.
76
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Cass Information Systems, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Cass Information Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based
on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022,
based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated
balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and
shareholders’ equity, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial
statements), and our report dated February 28, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 28, 2023
77
Table of Contents
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
78
Table of Contents
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Certain information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the following sections of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for
its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2023 Proxy Statement”), a copy of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of
the fiscal year: “Election of Directors – Proposal 1,” “Executive Compensation and Related Information,” and “Beneficial Ownership of Securities.”
The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics policy, applicable to all Company directors, executive officers and employees. The
policy is publicly available and can be viewed on the Company’s website at www.cassinfo.com. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement
under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding the amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of this policy that applies to the Company’s principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and that relates to any element of the
code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K by posting such information on its website.
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Board during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Certain information required pursuant to this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Election of Directors – Proposal 1” and
“Executive Compensation and Related Information” of the Company’s 2023 Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120
days after the close of the fiscal year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Information required pursuant to this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Beneficial Ownership of Securities” of the
Company’s 2023 Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following information is as of December 31, 2022:
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders
(1)(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders
Total
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
390,675 $
—
390,675 $
42.77
—
42.77
130,712
—
130,712
(1) Amount disclosed relates to awards issued under the Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock and Performance Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus
Plan”).
(2) Includes restricted stock units, restricted stock, SARs, and performance-based stock. Performance-based stock is included assuming 100% attainment
of the targets. The actual number of shares of performance-based stock to be awarded at the end of applicable performance periods ranges from 0% to
150% of the target amount awarded depending on the Company’s achievement of pre-established financial goals.
79
Table of Contents
Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for information concerning the Omnibus Plan.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Election of Directors – Proposal 1” of the Company’s 2023
Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information concerning our principal accountant’s fees and services is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Ratification of Appointment
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Proposal 5” of the Company’s 2023 Proxy Statement, a copy of which will be filed with the SEC no
later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year.
80
Table of Contents
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
The following documents are incorporated by reference in or filed as an exhibit to this report:
PART IV.
(1) and
(2)
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
Included in Item 8 of this report.
(3)
Exhibits listed under (b) of this Item 15.
(b)
Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
21
23
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-44499, filed with the SEC on January 20, 1998.
Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the current
report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 19, 2013.
Articles of Merger of Cass Commercial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 21, 2016.
Description of the Registrant’s securities, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020.
Form of Directors’ Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.*
Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock and Performance Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the current report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 19, 2013.*
Amendment and Restatement of the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.*
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.*
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.*
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.*
Description of Cass Information Systems, Inc. Profit Sharing Program, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022*
Subsidiaries of registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File
* Management contract or compensatory plan arrangement
(c) None.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
81
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURES
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
By
By
/s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
Eric H. Brunngraber
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Michael J. Normile
Michael J. Normile
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on the dates indicated by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in their capacity as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
Date: February 28, 2023
By
/s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
Eric H. Brunngraber
By
/s/ Ralph W. Clermont
Ralph W. Clermont
By
/s/ Robert A. Ebel
Robert A. Ebel
By
/s/ Benjamin F. Edwards, IV
Benjamin F. Edwards, IV
By
/s/ Wendy J. Henry
Wendy J. Henry
By
/s/ James J. Lindemann
James J. Lindemann
By
/s/ Ann W. Marr
Ann W. Marr
By
/s/ Sally H. Roth
Sally H. Roth
By
/s/ Joseph D. Rupp
Joseph D. Rupp
By
/s/ Randall L. Schilling
Randall L. Schilling
By
/s/ Franklin D. Wicks, Jr.
Franklin D. Wicks, Jr.
82
CASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC
Summary Profit Sharing Program
Exhibit 10.7
The purpose of the profit sharing program is to facilitate the Company’s continued growth and success by providing rewards that are commensurate with
achievement, thereby creating an incentive for superior performance and improved results for shareholders. All employees of Cass Information Systems are
eligible to participate in the program, unless specifically excluded due to their employment category, such as temporary staff or if their performance is not
meeting the minimum expectations.
The amount of the profit sharing fund available for distribution is set by the Board of Directors and currently set at 22.5% of the company’s net income
after taxes for the period of distribution.
Distributions are not guaranteed and the company may distribute profit sharing benefits on any schedule and in any manner that it deems appropriate.
Currently, distributions are made on a semi-annual basis.
Allocations to employee groups eligible to participate are divided into exempt and non-exempt pools based on the salaries of each group over the
corresponding period. The non-exempt pool is distributed to each eligible employee based on a factor of salary and performance score. The exempt pool is
distributed to all exempt employees considering factors such as position, salary grade and individual performance. Specific allocations are made out of the
exempt pool to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and other executive officers, including named executive officers (NEOs) as follows:
CEO – The CEO receives a percentage of the total profit sharing pool based on the change in net income after taxes (NIAT) from the prior year and is set to
provide a target percentage of base salary at target performance of 45%. The amount paid to the CEO can range from 0% up to a maximum of 70% of base
pay.
Executive Officers – A percentage of the total profit sharing pool is provided for distribution to other executive officers based on the change in NIAT from
the prior year and is set to provide a target percentage of base salaries at target performance of 40%. The total funds provided for distribution to the
executive officers can range from 0% up to a maximum of 60% of base pay. The amount of funds in this pool is distributed to each individual executive
officer by the CEO based on a subjective evaluation considering internal equity and other individual factors related to performance.
Individual distributions to exempt employees, other than the CEO and executive officers, as a percent of salary are subject to set limits based on each
individual’s pay grade and any payment in excess of these percentages shall require the review and approval of the President or Chief Operating Officer of
each business unit and the CEO. Payments in excess of the set limits for the CEO and executive officers need approval from the Board of Director’s
Compensation Committee.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 23
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-44497, 333-44499, 033-91456, 033-91568, 333-143411, 333-181772,
and 333-188504) on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2023, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cass Information Systems,
Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 28, 2023
Exhibit 31.1
I, Eric H. Brunngraber, certify that:
CERTIFICATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cass Information Systems, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2023
/s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
Eric H. Brunngraber
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
I, Michael J. Normile, certify that:
CERTIFICATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cass Information Systems, Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: February 28, 2023
/s/ Michael J. Normile
Michael J. Normile
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.1
In connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2022, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric H. Brunngraber, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
/s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
Eric H. Brunngraber
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 28, 2023
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Exhibit 32.2
In connection with the Annual Report of Cass Information Systems, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2022 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Normile, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
/s/ Michael J. Normile
Michael J. Normile
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
February 28, 2023
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cass Information Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Cass
Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.