I N N O V A T I O N & T R U S T
2 0 1 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T
COMPANY PROFILE
Culp, Inc. is one of the world’s largest marketers of mattress fabrics for bedding and upholstery fabrics
for furniture. The company markets a variety of innovative fabrics to its global customer base of leading
bedding and furniture companies, including fabrics produced at Culp’s manufacturing facilities and fabrics
sourced from other suppliers. Culp has operations located in the United States, Canada and China.
Shares in Culp, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CFI.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales
Income before income taxes
Net income
Net income per share:
Basic
Diluted
Adjusted net income (1)
Adjusted net income per share:
Basic
Diluted
Average shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
Cash Returned to Shareholders
Cost of shares repurchased
Number of shares repurchased
Dividends paid
Cumulative funds returned to shareholders (2)
Balance Sheet
Cash and cash equivalents and short term investments
Capital employed at fiscal year-end (1)
Return on capital (1)
Total assets
Total debt (including current maturities and line of credit)
Shareholder’s equity
Debt as a percent of shareholder’s equity
Mattress Fabrics Segment Highlights (3)
Net sales
Operating income
Operating income margin
Capital employed (1)
Return on capital (1)
Upholstery Fabrics Segment Highlights (3)
Net sales
Operating income
Operating income margin
Capital employed (1)
Return on capital (1)
2015
$ 310,166
22,956
15,071
2014
$ 287,162
19,043
17,447
2013
$ 268,814
20,289
18,317
1.23
1.21
1.43
1.41
1.50
1.47
19,352
15,691
17,408
1.58
1.56
12,217
12,422
745
43
7,579
28,527
1.29
1.26
1.42
1.40
12,177
12,414
12,235
12,450
–
–
2,204
$
5,022
503
7,593
39,729
79,184
29.3%
171,368
2,200
119,427
$
35,597
77,394
$ 28,816
72,699
26.2%
29.4%
160,935
4,986
111,744
144,706
7,161
95,583
1.8%
4.5%
7.5%
$
$
$
$ 179,739
21,671
$ 160,705
17,515
$ 154,014
19,900
12.1%
70,472
33.5%
10.9%
62,457
29.3%
12.9%
57,950
35.6%
$ 130,427
8,128
$ 126,457
8,036
$ 114,800
6,953
6.2%
14,026
48.7%
6.4%
17,419
40.7%
6.1%
17,313
40.4%
(1) See reconciliation tables at the end of the report
(2) Includes dividends paid and shares repurchased since June 2011
(3) See Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 80 of the fiscal 2015 Form 10-K
FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS
We are very pleased to report another outstanding year
for Culp.
Our financial and operating performance in fiscal 2015
demonstrates our proven ability to deliver favorable
results in a dynamic global marketplace. Over the past
year, we achieved both higher annual sales and improved
profitability in both businesses. Notably, this is the sixth
consecutive year of overall annual sales growth, or a 7.2
percent CAGR over the six-year period, and a new record
year for mattress fabrics sales. Our pre-tax income was
up 21 percent over the prior year, marking the highest
level for Culp since our founding. We also achieved a 29
percent return on capital employed, up from 26 percent in
the prior year.
Throughout the year, we have continued to execute our
strategy with a focus on design creativity and product
innovation, supported by exceptional service. Together,
these efforts have driven our sales performance, both
with existing key customers and new customers. Our
ability to sustain excellence in creating innovative fabrics
that meet changing customer demand continues to be
an important advantage for Culp. We have established
a strong leadership position in each of our businesses.
And, importantly, we have the fiscal discipline to support
our strategy and continue to innovate and invest for the
future. The collective value that these capabilities bring to
our business is translating into greater value for both our
customers and our shareholders.
Cash Returned to Shareholders
We are proud to share our financial success with our
shareholders, returning over $8.3 million in the form of
dividends and share repurchases in fiscal 2015. Commencing
in the third quarter, we increased the quarterly cash dividend
to a new annual rate of $0.24, effectively doubling the
quarterly cash dividend since we reinstated the dividend
in June 2011. Our excellent free cash flow of $15.1 million
provided an opportunity to pay another special dividend
for the third time in three years. Pursuant to our capital
allocation strategy, our Board of Directors approved a
special cash dividend of $0.40 per share, which was paid
in July 2015. Notably, since June 2011, the company has
returned approximately $35 million to shareholders in the
form of regular quarterly and special dividends and share
repurchases. These actions reflect our commitment to
delivering value to our shareholders.
NET SALES | FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 (IN MILLIONS)
$350
$300
$250
$200
$150
$310.2
$287.2
$268.8
$254.4
$216.8
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
O U R F O C U S O N D E S I G N A N D I N N O V A T I O N S E T S U S A P A R T I N T H E M A T T R E S S F A B R I C M A R K E T P L A C E .
1
Mattress Fabrics Segment
For fiscal 2015, mattress fabric sales were $179.7 million, up
11.8 percent from fiscal 2014, and setting a new annual sales
record. These results demonstrate solid execution of the
strategic plan that we laid out at the beginning of fiscal 2015,
with consistent growth and progress throughout the year.
We are especially pleased with our sales growth this year,
which has outpaced overall industry growth. Our focus on
design and innovation sets us apart in the mattress fabric
marketplace, and we continue to have favorable placements
with new product roll-outs to our customers. Our product
mix of mattress fabrics and sewn covers across most price
points and style trends has allowed us to execute our vision
to deliver a full design package from fabric to finished covers.
Our design team has done an exceptional job, and we have
continued to support our design efforts with investments in
the latest technologies and software, including an enhanced
new website, to leverage our talents and our Culp Home
Fashions brand.
We made notable progress in our operating performance
during fiscal 2015, with the most significant improvement
evident in our fourth quarter as we neared completion of
our $9.5 million expansion project. We were also able to
benefit from some lower input costs. Our capital investments
have already met our expectations with added capacity,
enhanced finishing capabilities, and better overall efficiency
and throughput. We expect to realize further improvement
in fiscal 2016 with additional new equipment installations
underway. Importantly, we have also created a strategic
infrastructure that will support our future growth initiatives,
and we will continue to make sound investments to improve
our competitive advantage. We are especially pleased with
the year over year evolution of our sewn cover business, which
further supports our diversification strategy and enhances
our strong value proposition. We have a solid competitive
position, and we look forward to the opportunities ahead
for another strong performance in both mattress fabrics and
sewn covers during fiscal 2016.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
We are pleased with the steady growth in sales and improved
profitability for upholstery fabrics in fiscal 2015. Upholstery
fabric sales were $130.4 million, up 3.1 percent from fiscal
2014, marking the sixth straight year of annual sales gains.
These results reflect the continued success of our product-
driven strategy with a focus on design and innovation.
This strategy has also allowed us to diversify our customer
base and target additional end-user markets, including the
hospitality market and “lifestyle” retail category.
W E D E L I V E R A F U L L D E S I G N P A C K A G E F R O M
M A T T R E S S F A B R I C T O F I N I S H E D C O V E R S .
Left to right, photos
courtesy of Bassett
Furniture and La-Z-Boy
2
“ C U L P H A S A P R O V E N R E P U T A T I O N A S A N I N D U S T R Y
L E A D E R K N O W N F O R I N N O V A T I V E P R O D U C T S A N D
C R E A T I V E F A B R I C D E S I G N S . ”
PRE-TAX INCOME AND PRE-TAX MARGIN (EXCLUDING RESTRUCTURING)
FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 (IN MILLIONS)
CAPITAL EMPLOYED AND RETURN ON CAPITAL
FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 (IN MILLIONS)
6.9%
5.6%
7.5%
6.6%
7.4%
$23.0
$20.3
$19.0
$15.1
$14.2
$24
$20
$16
$12
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
$80
$60
$40
24.9%
21.9%
29.4%
29.3%
26.2%
$77.4
$79.2
$72.7
$67.9
$62.5
32%
28%
24%
20%
16%
12%
8%
4%
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
3
Our 100 percent owned China platform provides significant
manufacturing flexibility, and we have continued to leverage
this capability to meet changing customer demand. Sales
of China produced fabrics accounted for approximately 90
percent of upholstery fabric sales in fiscal 2015, providing
a diverse product mix of fabric styles and price points with
excellent service and quality.
We made the decision in the second quarter to close our
finished goods warehouse and distribution facility located in
Poznan, Poland, due to the ongoing economic concerns in
Europe. However, we remain very interested in developing
business in Europe, and we are still assessing the best
strategy for selling upholstery fabric into this market as
economic conditions improve.
Culp has a proven reputation as an industry leader known for
innovative products and creative fabric designs. Our ability
to keep pace with current style trends is a critical advantage
for our customers. We were pleased with our favorable
showings at this year’s furniture markets, with positive
customer response to our latest product introductions and
significant placements. We believe Culp is well positioned
for sustained growth in upholstery fabrics, especially as the
overall economy improves with a more stable U.S. housing
market and higher consumer spending for home furnishings.
Balance Sheet and Free Cash Flow
As a result of our disciplined execution, we were pleased to
end fiscal 2015 with a strong financial position. The company
generated $15.1 million in free cash flow in fiscal 2015, after
investing $10.5 million in capital expenditures. Both our
businesses did an outstanding job in managing working
capital, which contributed to the strong free cash flow this
fiscal year. During fiscal 2015, we were able to build our
net cash position by approximately $7.0 million and return
$8.3 million of cash to shareholders through dividends
and share repurchases. Looking ahead to fiscal 2016, we
expect another good year of free cash flow, with capital
expenditures projected to be $7.5 million to $9.0 million and
modest growth in working capital.
As of the end of fiscal 2015, we reported $39.7 million in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Total
debt at the end of the year was $2.2 million, representing
the final installment on our term loan. Notably, our net cash
position, or cash minus total debt, was $37.5 million at the
end of fiscal 2015, the highest net cash level in Culp’s history.
We have since made our scheduled debt payment due in
August 2015.
FREE CASH FLOW AND DIVIDENDS PAID AND SHARES REPURCHASED
FISCAL YEARS 2011-15 (IN MILLIONS)
$15
$10
$5
0
$13.1
$13.8
$12.6
$15.1
$8.3
$9.0
$6.6
$5.4
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
$2.2
Q U A L I T Y U P H O L S T E R Y F A B R I C S W I T H A
F R E S H E Y E F O R S T Y L E .
4
“ O U R S T R A T E G Y H A S A L L O W E D U S
T O D I V E R S I F Y O U R C U S T O M E R B A S E A N D T A R G E T
A D D I T I O N A L E N D U S E R M A R K E T S , I N C L U D I N G T H E
‘ L I F E S T Y L E ’ R E T A I L C A T E G O R Y . ”
Photo courtesy of
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. west elm
5
C U L P O F F E R S A D I V E R S E P R O D U C T M I X O F F A B R I C S T Y L E S A N D P R I C E P O I N T S
W I T H E X C E L L E N T S E R V I C E A N D Q U A L I T Y .
Capital Allocation Strategy
Our focus on the efficient use of our capital is inherent in
Culp’s overall business strategy. We have previously shared
our capital allocation strategy in our annual reports, and we
are pleased to report that we again met our stated objectives
in fiscal 2015.
As always, our first priority is to fund organic growth in both
mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics. In fiscal 2015, we built
working capital by less than $2.0 million for the year, which
supported the growth of both businesses. Additionally, we
spent $10.5 million in capital expenditures, most of which
related to our mattress fabrics business.
Secondly, we increased our regular quarterly dividend by 20
percent to $0.06 per share for an annual level of $0.24 per
share. Third, we repurchased 43,000 shares of Culp common
stock at an average price of $17.30 per share for $745,000.
Fourth, our net cash position of $37.5 million at year-end
was well above our $31.0 million target level. As we have
previously stated, our objective is to use those excess funds
for special dividends, subject to cash availability in the
United States, prevailing market conditions and the overall
business outlook, and assuming there are no acquisition
opportunities. As such, after the end of fiscal 2015, we were
pleased to announce another special dividend of $0.40 per
share. This action demonstrates our confidence in Culp’s
leadership position and growth opportunities, and reinforces
our commitment to generating value for our shareholders.
Looking Ahead
We are pleased with Culp’s performance in fiscal 2015
and our ability to execute our strategy and enhance our
leadership position in a global marketplace. Our consistent
top-line growth reflects our outstanding design capabilities
and unique capacity to deliver a wide range of innovative
fabrics that keep pace with customer demand and style
trends. We are well positioned for continued growth with
our flexible and scalable global manufacturing platform,
backed by exceptional customer service. And, importantly,
we have the financial strength to make the right strategic
investments to further expand our production capabilities
and capitalize on new market opportunities.
We are proud of our company, and we continue to be
inspired by the talent and dedication of our team of long-
term associates who represent Culp around the world. And,
we are grateful to have the support and leadership of an
outstanding management team and board of directors.
Together, we are committed to outstanding performance for
our customers as a financially stable and trusted source for
innovative fabrics. We are excited about the opportunities
before us as we look ahead to fiscal 2016 and beyond.
Thank you for the support your investment provides.
Sincerely,
Franklin N. Saxon
President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert C. Culp, III
Chairman of the Board
August 12, 2015
6
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 1O-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended May 3, 2015
Commission File No. 1-12597
CULP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NORTH CAROLINA
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or other organization)
56-1001967
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1823 Eastchester Drive, High Point, North Carolina
(Address of principal executive offices)
27265
(zip code)
(336) 889-5161
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange
On Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $.05/ Share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act. YES
NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. YES
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days. YES
NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web
site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). YES
NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-
accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and
smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
Accelerated Filer
Non-Accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
NO
YES
As of May 3, 2015, 12,219,121 shares of common stock were outstanding. As of November 2, 2014, the
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on that date was $198,300,713
based on the closing sales price of such stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), assuming, for
purposes of this report, that all executive officers and directors of the registrant are affiliates.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange
Commission in connection with its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 16, 2015 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
CULP, INC.
FORM 10-K REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Page
Business
Overview ........................................................................................................................... 2
General Information .......................................................................................................... 3
Segments ........................................................................................................................... 3
Overview of Industry and Markets ................................................................................... 5
Overview of Bedding Industry .......................................................................................... 5
Overview of Residential and Commercial Furniture Industry .......................................... 6
Products ............................................................................................................................ 6
Manufacturing and Sourcing............................................................................................. 8
Product Design and Styling .............................................................................................. 9
Distribution ....................................................................................................................... 9
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials .................................................................... 10
Seasonality ...................................................................................................................... 10
Competition .................................................................................................................... 11
Environmental and Other Regulations ............................................................................ 11
Employees ....................................................................................................................... 12
Customers and Sales ....................................................................................................... 12
Net Sales by Geographic Area ........................................................................................ 13
Backlog ........................................................................................................................... 13
Risk Factors ........................................................................................................................ 14
Unresolved Staff Comments ............................................................................................... 17
Properties ............................................................................................................................ 18
Legal Proceedings ............................................................................................................... 18
Mine Safety Disclosure ....................................................................................................... 18
PART II
Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities ............................................................................... 19
Selected Financial Data ...................................................................................................... 22
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ......................................................................................................................... 23
Item No.
1.
1A.
1B.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ............................................ 49
8.
9.
9A.
9B.
Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data............................................. 50
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure ......................................................................................................................... 86
Controls and Procedures ..................................................................................................... 86
Other Information ............................................................................................................... 88
Item No.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Page
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance................................................. 88
Executive Compensation .................................................................................................... 88
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters ............................................................................................. 88
Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence ......................... 89
Principal Accountant Fees and Services ............................................................................. 89
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...................................................................... 90
PART IV
Documents Filed as Part of this Report .............................................................................. 90
Exhibits ............................................................................................................................... 92
Financial Statement Schedules ........................................................................................... 92
Signatures ........................................................................................................................... 93
Exhibit Index ...................................................................................................................... 94
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Parts I and II of this report contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal
securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Such statements
are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Further, forward-looking statements are intended to speak
only as of the date on which they are made, and we disclaim any duty to update or alter such statements
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are
statements that include projections, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are
not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often but not always characterized by qualifying
words such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “anticipate,” “depend” and their
derivatives, and include but are not limited to statements about expectations for our future operations,
production levels, sales, gross profit margins, operating income, capital expenditures, income taxes,
SG&A or other expenses, earnings, cash flow, and other performance measures, as well as any statements
regarding future economic or industry trends or future developments. Factors that could influence the
matters discussed in such statements include the level of housing starts and sales of existing homes,
consumer confidence, trends in disposable income, and general economic conditions. Decreases in these
economic indicators could have a negative effect on our business and prospects. Likewise, increases in
interest rates, particularly home mortgage rates, and increases in consumer debt or the general rate of
inflation, could affect the company adversely. Changes in consumer tastes or preferences toward
products not produced by us could erode demand for our products. Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar
versus other currencies could affect our financial results because a significant portion of our operations
are located outside the United States. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies could
make our products less competitive on the basis of price in markets outside the United States, and
strengthening of currencies in Canada and China can have a negative impact on our sales in the U.S. of
products produced in those places. Also, economic and political instability in international areas could
affect our operations or sources of goods in those areas, as well as demand for our products in
international markets. Further information about these factors, as well as other factors that could affect
our future operations or financial results and the matters discussed in forward-looking statements are
included in the “Risk Factors” section of this report in Item 1A. A forward-looking statement is neither a
prediction nor a guarantee of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances that
may not occur.
PART 1
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Culp, Inc. manufacturers, sources, and markets mattress fabrics and sewn covers used for covering
mattresses and box springs, and upholstery fabrics, including cut and sewn kits, primarily used in
production of upholstered furniture. The company competes in a fashion-driven business, and we strive to
differentiate our products by placing sustained focus on innovation and design creativity. In addition,
Culp places great emphasis on providing excellent and dependable service to our customers. Our focused
efforts to protect our financial strength have allowed us to maintain our position as a financially stable
and trusted supplier of innovative fabrics to bedding and furniture manufacturers.
We believe Culp is the largest producer of mattress fabrics in North America and one of the largest
marketers of upholstery fabrics for furniture in North America, measured by total sales. We have two
operating segments — mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics. The mattress fabrics business markets
primarily knitted and woven fabrics, and sewn covers made from those fabrics, which are used in the
production of bedding products, including mattresses, box springs, and mattress sets. The upholstery
fabrics business markets a variety of fabric products that are used principally in the production of
residential and commercial upholstered furniture, including sofas, recliners, chairs, loveseats, sectionals,
sofa-beds and office seating. Culp primarily markets fabrics that have broad appeal in the “good” and
“better” priced categories of furniture and bedding.
Culp markets a variety of fabrics in different categories to a global customer base, including fabrics
produced at our manufacturing facilities and fabrics produced by other suppliers. We had thirteen active
manufacturing plants and distribution facilities as of the end of fiscal 2015, located in North and South
Carolina; Quebec, Canada; and Shanghai, China. We also source fabrics from other manufacturers,
located primarily in China and Turkey, with almost all of those fabrics produced specifically for Culp and
created by Culp designers. We operate distribution centers in North Carolina and Shanghai, China, to
facilitate distribution of our products.
Total net sales in fiscal 2015 were $310.2 million. The mattress fabrics segment had net sales of $179.7
million (58% of total net sales), while the upholstery fabrics segment had net sales of $130.4 million
(42% of total net sales).
During fiscal 2015, both segments continued to build upon strategic initiatives and structural changes
over the last several years. The flexible manufacturing and sourcing platform created through these
changes has allowed Culp to place a greater emphasis on product innovation and the introduction of new
designs to keep current with industry trends and differentiate our products. This approach has helped us
drive consistent sales growth, with fiscal 2015 representing our sixth consecutive year of higher net sales.
Both the strength of furniture and mattress industries demand for our products has improved during the
past several years, however overall sales have still not returned to the levels seen before the economic
downturn. During the same period, we have experienced positive responses from customers to our
innovative designs and new products introduced during these years, and our profits have responded
accordingly. Pre-tax income reported for fiscal 2015 was $23.0 million, the highest level in Culp’s
history. An increasing percentage of our sales are now based on new product introductions.
2
The mattress fabrics segment has made strategic investments in capital projects and expansion initiatives
in recent years, to maintain a more flexible approach to fabric sourcing, in-line with challenging industry
conditions. These expenditures included a record capital expenditure level for the segment in fiscal 2015
for expansion projects to provide increased manufacturing capacity and more efficient equipment for this
segment, following several successful acquisitions. The mattress fabrics segment has also expanded its
design capabilities with additional personnel and product software to enhance innovation. During fiscal
2013, this segment announced a new joint marketing agreement to market sewn mattress covers, which
involved the establishment of a new production facility. Early in fiscal 2014, we completed an asset
purchase and related consulting agreement that provided for, among other things, the purchase of
equipment and certain other assets and the restructuring of prior consulting and non-compete agreements.
These initiatives have allowed for further expansion of our mattress fabrics business.
Our upholstery fabrics segment underwent major changes over the past decade, transforming from a
primarily U.S.-based manufacturing operation with large amounts of fixed assets, to a more flexible
variable cost model, with most fabrics sourced in Asia. At the same time, we have maintained control
over the key components of fabric production such as design, finishing, quality control, and distribution.
These changes involved a multi-year restructuring process that ended in fiscal 2009, during which time
our upholstery fabric sales declined considerably. This multi-year trend of declining upholstery revenues
has reversed, and sales in this segment have now increased for each of the past six fiscal years. Since the
end of the multi-year restructuring, we have focused on product innovation and marketing, including the
exploration of new markets.
Additional information about trends and developments in each of our business segments is provided in the
“Segments” discussion below.
General Information
Culp, Inc. was organized as a North Carolina corporation in 1972 and made its initial public offering in
1983. Since 1997, our stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange and traded under the
symbol “CFI.” Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Sunday closest to April 30. Our
executive offices are located in High Point, North Carolina. References in this document to “Culp,” the
“company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Culp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Culp maintains an Internet website at www.culp.com. We will make this annual report and our other
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to these reports available free of charge on our Internet site as soon as reasonably practicable
after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Information included on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report.
Segments
Our two operating segments are mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics. The following table sets forth
certain information for each of our segments.
Sales by Fiscal Year ($ in Millions) and Percentage of Total Company Sales
Segment
Mattress Fabrics
Upholstery Fabrics
Non-U.S.-Produced
U.S.-Produced
Total Upholstery
Total company
Fiscal 2015
$179.7
$119.1
$11.3
$130.4
$310.2
(58%)
(38%)
(4%)
(42%)
(100%)
(56%)
(40%)
(4%)
(44%)
(100%)
Fiscal 2013
$154.0
$102.1
$12.7
$114.8
$268.8
(57%)
(38%)
(5%)
(43%)
(100%)
Fiscal 2014
$160.7
$116.0
$10.5
$126.5
$287.2
3
Additional financial information about our operating segments can be found in Note 16 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report.
Mattress Fabrics. The mattress fabrics segment, also known as Culp Home Fashions, manufactures and
markets mattress fabric and mattress covers to bedding manufacturers. These products include woven
jacquard fabrics, knitted fabrics, and some converted fabrics. Culp Home Fashions has manufacturing
facilities located in Stokesdale and High Point, North Carolina, and St. Jerome, Quebec, Canada. One
Stokesdale plant and the St. Jerome plant both manufacture and finish jacquard (damask) fabric. The
main Stokesdale plant also finishes knitted fabric and houses the division offices and finished goods
distribution capabilities, while the High Point and St. Jerome facilities house our knitted mattress fabrics
manufacturing operations. During fiscal 2013, the mattress fabrics division established a second plant in
Stokesdale to produce cut and sewn mattress covers, a growing product category that is used primarily by
producers of specialty (non-innerspring) bedding. We have also maintained flexibility in our supply of
the major categories of mattress fabrics with sourcing capacity located in Turkey and China. Most of our
woven jacquard and knitted fabrics can be produced in multiple facilities (internal or external to the
company), providing us with mirrored, reactive capacity involving state of the art capabilities across plant
facilities.
Culp Home Fashions had capital expenditures during the past ten years totaling approximately $50
million, which primarily provided for increased knit machine capacity, faster and more efficient weaving
machines, and the initial capital required for our sewn cover business. These capital expenditures also
provided high technology finishing equipment for woven and knitted fabric and an improved platform for
warehousing and distribution. In order to maintain our leading edge technology and support
modernization and expansion projects, we significantly increased our capital investments in the mattress
fabrics segment during fiscal 2015.
Asset acquisition transactions with Bodet & Horst USA, LP and Bodet & Horst GmbH & Co. KG, in
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2014, respectively, allowed us to enhance and secure our competitive position and
to increase our mattress fabrics business. Prior to fiscal 2009, Bodet & Horst had been serving as our
primary source of knitted mattress fabrics, and the two transactions allowed us to secure our supply for
this important and growing product category, while also gaining control of product development and
enhancing customer service. The transactions also involved consulting and non-compete agreements that
enhanced our mattress fabrics product development and helped to secure our end markets. In addition to
these transactions, we have continued to make further investments in knitting machines and finishing
equipment, increasing our internal production capacity substantially.
Our sewn mattress cover business, established during fiscal 2013, participates in a joint marketing
agreement for the production and marketing of sewn mattress covers and represents a further step in our
efforts to respond to industry demands. The marketing venture is known as Culp-Lava Applied Sewn
Solutions (CLASS), and is a joint marketing effort with A. Lava & Son Co. of Chicago, a leading
provider of mattress covers. This manufacturing operation, located near our other plants in North
Carolina, involves leased space and a limited capital investment in equipment. Teaming with A. Lava &
Son allows us to have two mirrored manufacturing facilities and greater flexibility in meeting demand for
mattress covers from bedding producers.
Upholstery Fabrics. The upholstery fabrics segment markets fabrics for residential and commercial
furniture, including jacquard woven fabrics, velvets, microdenier suedes, woven dobbies, knitted fabrics,
piece-dyed woven products, and polyurethane “leather look” fabrics. This segment operates fabric
manufacturing facilities in Anderson, South Carolina, and Shanghai, China. We market fabrics produced
in these two locations, as well as a variety of upholstery fabrics sourced from third party producers,
mostly in China. In the past fiscal year, sales of non-U.S. produced upholstery accounted for
approximately 90% of our upholstery fabric sales.
4
Our China facilities near Shanghai include fabric sourcing, finishing, warehousing, quality control and
inspection operations, as well as a plant where sourced fabrics are cut and sewn into “kits” made to
specifications of furniture manufacturing customers. More recent developments in our China operations
include expansion of our product development and design capabilities in China and further strengthening
of key strategic partnerships with mills. We also have expanded our marketing efforts to sell our China
products in countries other than the U.S., including the Chinese local market. The U.S. facility in South
Carolina produces a variety of woven upholstery fabrics, including velvets and certain decorative fabrics.
During fiscal 2015 we closed our distribution warehouse in Poland that had been established to support
sales in Europe. We are currently reviewing the company’s best long-term strategy for marketing
upholstery fabrics in Europe.
Over the past decade, we have moved our upholstery business from one that relied on a large fixed capital
base that is difficult to adjust to a more flexible and scalable marketer of upholstery fabrics that meets
changing levels of customer demand and style preferences. At the same time, we have maintained control
of the most important “value added” aspects of our business, such as design, finishing, quality control,
and logistics. This strategic approach has allowed us to limit our investment of capital in fixed assets and
control the costs of our products, while continuing to leverage our design and finishing expertise, industry
knowledge, and important relationships.
Our upholstery fabrics sales increased in fiscal 2015 for the sixth consecutive year. These gains reversed
a ten-year trend of declining upholstery sales that ended with fiscal 2009, as we substantially overhauled
our operating model during this time period. We believe our increased sales in the upholstery fabrics
segment have been achieved primarily through implementation of a business strategy that included: 1)
innovation in a low-cost environment, 2) speed-to-market execution, 3) consistent quality, 4) reliable
service and lead times, and 5) increased recognition of and reliance on the Culp brand. Success in
upholstery fabrics has been achieved through development of a unique business model that has enabled
the upholstery segment to execute a strategy that we believe is clearly differentiated from our competitors.
In this way, we have maintained our ability to provide furniture manufacturers with products from every
category of fabric used to cover upholstered furniture, and to meet continually changing demand levels
and consumer preferences.
Overview of Industry and Markets
Culp markets products primarily to manufacturers that operate in three principal markets. The mattress
fabrics segment supplies the bedding industry, which produces mattress sets (mattresses, box springs,
foundations and top of bed components). The upholstery fabrics segment supplies the residential
furniture industry and, to a lesser extent, the commercial furniture industry. The residential furniture
market includes upholstered furniture sold to consumers for household use, including sofas, sofa-beds,
chairs, recliners and sectionals. The commercial furniture and fabrics market includes upholstered office
seating and modular office systems sold primarily for use in offices and other institutional settings,
fabrics used in the hospitality industry, and commercial textile wall coverings. The principal industries
into which the company sells products are described below. Currently the vast majority of our products
are sold to manufacturers for end use in the U.S., and thus the discussions below are focused on that
market.
Overview of Bedding Industry
The bedding industry has contracted and expanded in recent years in accordance with the general
economy, although traditionally the industry has been relatively mature and stable. This is due in part to
the fact that a majority of bedding industry sales are replacement purchases, which are less volatile than
sales based on economic growth and new household formations.
5
Unlike the residential furniture industry, which continues to face intense competition from imports, the
U.S. bedding industry has largely remained a North American-based business with limited competition
from imports. Imports of bedding into the U.S. have increased in recent years, but imported beds still
represent only a small fraction of total U.S. bedding sales. The primary reasons for this fact include: 1)
the short lead times demanded by mattress manufacturers and retailers due to their quick service delivery
model, 2) the limited inventory carried by manufacturers and retailers requires “just-in-time” delivery of
product, 3) the customized nature of each manufacturer’s and retailer’s product lines, 4) high shipping
and import duty costs, 5) the relatively low direct labor content in mattresses, and 6) strong brand
recognition and importance.
A key trend driving the bedding industry is increased awareness among consumers about the health
benefits of better sleep, with a greater focus on the quality of bedding products and an apparent
willingness on the part of consumers to upgrade their bedding. Another important trend is the strong and
growing emphasis on the design knitted or woven into mattress fabrics to enhance visual appeal and
perceived value of the mattress on the retail floor. Mattress fabric design efforts are based on current
trends in home decor and fashion. Another trend has been the growth in non-traditional sources for retail
mattress sales such as wholesale warehouse clubs and the internet. These sales channels have the potential
to increase overall consumption of goods due to convenience and high traffic volume, which in turn
results in higher turnover of product. Among fabric types, knitted fabrics have continued to increase in
popularity. Knitted fabric was initially used primarily on premium mattresses, but these products are now
being placed increasingly on mattresses at mid-range to lower retail price points.
Overview of Residential and Commercial Furniture Industry
Sales of residential and commercial furniture were both severely affected by the global economic
downturn in 2008-2009, and have now been in recovery for several years along with the overall economy.
The pace of recovery since 2010 has been relatively steady, but modest, as has the growth rate for the
economy as a whole. Sales of residential furniture are influenced significantly by the housing industry
and by trends in home sales and household formations, while demand for commercial furniture generally
reflects economic trends affecting businesses.
The sourcing of components and fully assembled furniture from overseas continues to play a major role in
the furniture industry. By far, the largest source for these imports continues to be China. Imports of
upholstery fabric, both in roll and in “kit” form, have also had a significant impact on the market for
upholstery fabrics in recent years. Fabrics entering the U.S. from China and other low labor cost
countries have resulted in increased price competition in the upholstery fabric and upholstered furniture
markets.
Supply shortages and higher prices for leather have created increased opportunities for suppliers of
“leather look” and suede fabrics, and for suppliers of upholstery generally. The residential furniture
industry has been consolidating for several years, resulting in fewer, but larger, customers for marketers
of upholstery fabrics. Intense price competition continues to be an important consideration for both
residential and commercial furniture.
Products
As described above, our products include mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics, which are the
company’s identified operating segments. These fabrics are sold in roll form and as sewn mattress covers
by the Mattress Fabrics segment, and in roll form and as cut and sewn kits by the Upholstery Fabrics
segment.
6
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Mattress fabrics segment sales constituted 56% to 58% of our total net sales in each of the past three
fiscal years. The company has emphasized fabrics that have broad appeal at prices generally ranging
from $1.50 to more than $10.00 per yard.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Upholstery fabrics segment sales totaled 42% to 44% of our sales for each of the past three fiscal years.
The company has emphasized fabrics that have broad appeal at “good” and “better” prices, generally
ranging from $3.00 to $8.25 per yard.
Culp Fabric Categories by Segment
We market products in most categories of fabric that manufacturers currently use for bedding and
furniture. The following table indicates the product lines within each segment, and a brief description of
their characteristics.
Mattress Fabrics
Woven jacquards
Converted
Knitted fabric
Upholstery Fabrics
Woven jacquards
Woven dobbies
Velvets
Suedes
Various patterns and intricate designs. Woven on complex looms using a
variety of synthetic and natural yarns.
Suedes, pile and embroidered fabrics, and other specialty type products are
sourced to offer diversity for higher end mattresses.
Various patterns and intricate designs produced on special-width circular knit
machines utilizing a variety of synthetic and natural yarns. Knitted mattress
fabrics have inherent stretching properties and spongy softness, which
conforms well with layered foam packages.
Elaborate, complex designs such as florals and tapestries in traditional,
transitional, and contemporary styles. Woven on intricate looms using a wide
variety of synthetic and natural yarns.
Fabrics that use straight lines to produce geometric designs such as plaids,
stripes, and solids in traditional and country styles. Woven on less
complicated looms using a variety of weaving constructions and primarily
synthetic yarns.
Soft fabrics with a plush feel. Woven or knitted in basic designs, using
synthetic yarns which are yarn dyed or piece dyed.
Fabrics woven or knitted using microdenier polyester yarns, which are piece
dyed and finished, usually by sanding. The fabrics are typically plain or small
jacquard designs, with some being printed. These are sometimes referred to as
microdenier suedes.
Faux leathers
Sueded or knitted base cloths which are overprinted with polyurethane, and
composite products consisting of a base fabric which is coated with a top layer
of polyurethane, which simulate the look and feel of leather.
7
Manufacturing and Sourcing
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Our mattress fabrics segment operates four manufacturing plants, with two located in Stokesdale, North
Carolina, and one each in High Point, North Carolina, and St. Jerome, Quebec, Canada. Over the past ten
fiscal years, we made capital expenditures of approximately $50 million to consolidate all of our
production of woven jacquards, or damask fabric, to these plants, to modernize both knit and weaving
equipment, enhance and provide knit and woven finishing capabilities, and expand capacity in each of
these facilities. The result has been an increase in manufacturing efficiency and reductions in operating
costs, as well as expanded product offerings.
Jacquard mattress fabrics and knitted fabrics are produced at the St. Jerome plant, with further jacquard
capacity at our main Stokesdale facility along with knitting capacity at our High Point facility. Most
finishing and inspection processes for mattress fabrics are conducted at the main Stokesdale plant. In
fiscal 2013, we announced a new joint marketing arrangement with a producer of sewn mattress covers
for bedding. This effort resulted in the establishment of an additional manufacturing facility in
Stokesdale to produce and market sewn mattress covers.
In addition to the mattress fabrics we manufacture, we have important supply arrangements in place that
allow us to source mattress fabric from strategic suppliers. A portion of our woven jacquard fabric and
knitted fabric is obtained from a supplier located in Turkey, based on designs and a production schedule
created by Culp. We are also sourcing some Culp-designed knitted fabrics from suppliers based in China,
and we are sourcing certain converted fabric products (such as suedes, pile fabrics and embroidered
fabrics) through our China platform.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
We currently operate one upholstery manufacturing facility in the U.S. and four in China. The U.S. plant
is located in Anderson, South Carolina, and mainly produces velvet upholstery fabrics with some
production of certain decorative fabrics.
Our upholstery manufacturing facilities in China are all located within the same industrial area near
Shanghai. At these facilities, we apply value-added finishing processes to fabrics sourced from a limited
number of strategic suppliers in China, and we inspect sourced fabric there as well. In addition, the
Shanghai operations include facilities where sourced fabric is cut and sewn to provide “kits” that are
designed to be placed on specific furniture frames designated by our customers.
A large portion of our upholstery fabric products, as well as certain elements of our production processes,
are being sourced from outside suppliers. The development of our facilities in China has provided a base
from which to access a variety of products, including certain fabrics (such as microdenier suedes and
polyurethane fabrics) that are not produced anywhere within the U.S. We have found opportunities to
develop significant relationships with key overseas suppliers in China that allow us to source products on
a cost-effective basis, while limiting our investment of capital in manufacturing assets. We source
unfinished and finished fabrics, as well as a portion of our cut and sewn kits, from a limited number of
strategic suppliers in China who are willing to commit significant capacity to meet our needs while
working with our product development team to meet the demands of our customers. We also source a
portion of our yarns for our U.S. operation through our China facilities. The remainder of our yarn is
obtained from other suppliers around the world.
8
Product Design and Styling
Consumer tastes and preferences related to bedding and upholstered furniture change over time. The use
of new fabrics and creative designs remains an important consideration for manufacturers to distinguish
their products at retail and to capitalize on changes in preferred colors, patterns and textures. Culp’s
success is largely dependent on our ability to market fabrics with appealing designs and patterns. The
process of developing new designs involves maintaining an awareness of broad fashion and color trends
both in the United States and internationally.
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Design innovation is an increasingly important element of producing mattress fabrics. Price point
delineation is accomplished through fabric quality as well as variation in design. Additionally, consumers
are drawn to the mattress that is most visually appealing when walking into a retail showroom. Fiber
differentiation also plays an important part in design. For example, rayon, organic cotton and other
special fibers are incorporated into the design process to allow the retailer to offer consumers additional
benefits related to their sleeping experience. Similarly, many fabrics contain special production finishes
that enhance fabric performance.
Mattress fabric designs are not routinely introduced on a scheduled season. Designs are typically
introduced upon the request of the customer as they plan introduction to their retailers. Additionally, we
work closely with our customers on new design offerings around the major furniture markets such as
High Point, North Carolina, and Las Vegas, Nevada.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
The company has developed an upholstery fabrics design and product development team (with staff
located in the U.S. and in China) with focus on designing for value primarily on body cloths, while
promoting style leadership with pillow fabrics and color. The team searches continually for new ideas
and for the best sources of raw materials, yarns, and fabrics, utilizing a supply network located mostly in
China. Using these design elements, they develop product offerings using ideas and materials which take
both fashion trends and cost considerations into account to offer products designed to meet the needs of
furniture manufacturers and ultimately the desires of consumers.
Upholstery fabric designs are introduced at major fabric trade conferences that occur twice a year in the
United States (June and December). In recent years we have become more aggressive in registering
copyrights for popular fabric patterns and taking steps to discourage the illegal copying of our proprietary
designs.
Distribution
Mattress Fabrics Segment
The vast majority of our shipments of mattress fabrics originate from our facilities in Stokesdale, North
Carolina. Through arrangements with major customers and in accordance with industry practice, we
maintain a significant inventory of mattress fabrics at our distribution facility in Stokesdale (“make to
stock”), so that products may be shipped to customers with short lead times and on a “just in time” basis.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
A majority of our upholstery fabrics are marketed on a “make to order” basis and are shipped directly
from our distribution facilities in Burlington, North Carolina, and Shanghai, China. In addition to “make
to order” distribution, an inventory comprised of a limited number of fabric patterns is held at our
9
distribution facilities in Burlington and Shanghai from which our customers can obtain quick delivery of
sourced fabrics through a program known as “Culp Express.” Beginning in fiscal 2010 and continuing
through fiscal 2015, market share opportunities have been expanded through strategic selling
partnerships.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Raw materials account for approximately 60%-70% of mattress fabric production costs. The mattress
fabrics segment purchases synthetic yarns (polyester, polypropylene, and rayon), certain greige
(unfinished) goods, latex adhesives, laminates, dyes, and other chemicals. Most of these materials are
available from several suppliers and prices fluctuate based on supply and demand, the general rate of
inflation, and particularly on the price of petrochemical products. The mattress fabrics segment has
generally not had significant difficulty in obtaining raw materials.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Raw materials account for approximately 60%-70% of upholstery fabric manufacturing costs for products
the company manufactures. This segment purchases synthetic yarns (polypropylene, polyester, acrylic,
and rayon), acrylic staple fiber, latex adhesives, dyes and other chemicals from various suppliers.
Increased reliance by both our U.S. and China upholstery operations on outside suppliers for basic
production needs such as base fabrics, yarns, and finishing services has caused the upholstery fabrics
segment to become more vulnerable to price increases, delays, or production interruptions caused by
problems within businesses that we do not control.
Both Segments
Many of our basic raw materials are petrochemical products or are produced from such products. For this
reason, our material costs can be sensitive to changes in prices for petrochemicals and the underlying
price of oil. During fiscal 2015, our profitability was aided somewhat by lower raw material prices due to
lower oil prices, although raw material prices appeared to stabilize later in the year.
Seasonality
Mattress Fabrics Segment
The mattress fabrics business and the bedding industry in general are slightly seasonal, with sales being
the highest in early spring and late summer, with another peak in mid-winter.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
The upholstery fabrics business is somewhat seasonal, with sales often higher during our first and fourth
fiscal quarters. In the past, seasonality resulted from one-week closings of our manufacturing facilities
and the facilities of most of our customers in the United States during our first and third fiscal quarters for
the holiday weeks of July 4th and Christmas. This effect has become less pronounced as a larger portion
of our fabrics are produced or sold in locations outside of the U.S. The timing of the Chinese National
Holiday in October and the Chinese New Year (which occurs in January or February each year) now have
a more significant impact on upholstery sales than the effects of U.S. holiday periods.
10
Competition
Competition for our products is high and is based primarily on price, design, quality, timing of delivery,
and service.
Mattress Fabrics Segment
The mattress fabrics market is concentrated in a few relatively large suppliers. We believe our principal
mattress fabric competitors are Bekaert Textiles B.V., Global Textile Alliance, and several smaller
companies producing knitted and other fabric.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
In the upholstery fabric market, we compete against a large number of companies, ranging from a few
large manufacturers comparable in size to Culp to small producers, and a growing number of “converters”
of fabrics (companies who buy and re-sell, but do not manufacture fabrics). We believe our principal
upholstery fabric competitors are Richloom Fabrics, Merrimack Fabrics, Morgan Fabrics, and Specialty
Textile, Inc. (or STI), plus a large number of smaller competitors (both manufacturers and converters).
The trend in the upholstery fabrics industry to greater overseas competition and the entry of more
converters has caused the upholstery fabrics industry to become substantially more fragmented in recent
years, with lower barriers to entry. This has resulted in a larger number of competitors selling upholstery
fabrics, with an increase in competition based on price.
Environmental and Other Regulations
We are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, including the Occupational Safety and
Health Act (“OSHA”) and federal and state environmental laws, as well as similar laws governing our
manufacturing facilities in China and Canada. We periodically review our compliance with these laws
and regulations in an attempt to minimize the risk of violations.
Our operations involve a variety of materials and processes that are subject to environmental regulation.
Under current law, environmental liability can arise from previously owned properties, leased properties
and properties owned by third parties, as well as from properties currently owned and leased by the
company. Environmental liabilities can also be asserted by adjacent landowners or other third parties in
toxic tort litigation.
In addition, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), and analogous state statutes, liability can be imposed for the disposal of
waste at sites targeted for cleanup by federal and state regulatory authorities. Liability under CERCLA is
strict as well as joint and several.
The U.S. Congress is currently considering legislation to address climate change that is intended to reduce
overall greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide. In addition, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency has made a determination that greenhouse gas emissions may be a threat to human
health and the environment. International agreements may also result in new regulations on greenhouse
gas emissions. It is uncertain if, when, and in what form, a mandatory carbon dioxide emissions
reduction program may be enacted either through legislation or regulation. However, if enacted, this type
of program could materially increase our operating costs, including costs of raw materials, transportation,
and electricity. It is difficult to predict the extent to which any new rules or regulations would affect our
business, but we would expect the effect on our operations to be similar to that for other manufacturers,
particularly those in our industry.
11
We are periodically involved in environmental claims or litigation and requests for information from
environmental regulators. Each of these matters is carefully evaluated, and the company provides for
environmental matters based on information presently available. Based on this information, we do not
believe that environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on either the company’s financial
condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that the costs associated with
environmental matters will not increase in the future. See the discussion of an environmental claim
against the company that was settled late in fiscal 2014 in Note 11 to the financial statements contained in
Item 8 hereof.
Employees
As of May 3, 2015, we had 1,188 employees, compared with 1,167 at the end of fiscal 2014. Overall, our
total number of employees has remained fairly steady over the past five years, with increases in the
mattress fabrics segment and decreases in the upholstery segment during that period.
The hourly employees at our manufacturing facility in Canada (approximately 13% of the company’s
workforce) are represented by a local, unaffiliated union. The collective bargaining agreement for these
employees expires on February 1, 2017. We are not aware of any efforts to organize any more of our
employees, and we believe our relations with our employees are good.
The following table illustrates the changes in the location of our workforce and number of employees, as
of year-end, over the past five fiscal years.
Number of Employees
Fiscal
2015
Fiscal
2014
Fiscal
2013
Fiscal
2012
Fiscal
2011
631
592
577
492
466
129
-
424
553
4
1,188
129
4
438
571
4
1,167
121
5
464
590
4
1,171
113
8
497
618
4
1,114
130
6
543
679
4
1,149
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
United States
Poland
China
Total Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Unallocated corporate
Total
Customers and Sales
Mattress Fabrics Segment
Major customers for our mattress fabrics include the leading bedding manufacturers: Serta-Simmons
Bedding (SSB), Tempur + Sealy International, and Corsicana Bedding. The loss of one or more of these
customers would have a material adverse effect on the company. Our two largest customers in the
mattress fabrics segment are (1) SSB, accounting for approximately 23% of the company’s overall sales
in fiscal 2015, and (2) Tempur + Sealy International, Inc., accounting for approximately 8% of our overall
sales in fiscal 2015. The loss of either of these customers would have a material adverse effect on the
company. Our mattress fabrics customers also include many small and medium-size bedding
manufacturers.
12
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Our major customers for upholstery fabrics are leading manufacturers of upholstered furniture, including
Ashley, Bassett, Best Home Furnishings, Flexsteel, Heritage Home Group (Broyhill and Lane), Jackson
Furniture, Jonathan Louis, La-Z-Boy (La-Z-Boy Residential and England), and Southern Motion. Major
customers for the company’s fabrics for commercial furniture include HON Industries. Our largest
customer in the upholstery fabrics segment is La-Z-Boy Incorporated, the loss of which would have a
material adverse effect on the company. Our sales to La-Z-Boy accounted for approximately 13% of the
company’s total net sales in fiscal 2015.
The following table sets forth our net sales by geographic area by amount and percentage of total net sales
for the three most recent fiscal years.
Net Sales by Geographic Area
(dollars in thousands)
Fiscal 2015
Fiscal 2014
Fiscal 2013
$ 242,833 78.3%
$ 232,078 80.8%
$ 207,201 77.1%
30,758
United States
North America
(Excluding USA)(1)
Far East and Asia(2)
31,855
4,720
All other areas
Subtotal (International) 67,333
10.0
15,556
5.4
11,900
4.4
10.3
1.5
21.7
33,487
6,041
55,084
11.7
2.1
19.2
43,907
5,806
61,613
16.3
2.2
22.9
Total
$ 310,166 100%
$ 287,162 100%
$ 268,814 100%
(1) Of this amount, $24.1 million are attributable to shipments to Mexico in fiscal 2015, with
corresponding amounts of $9.3 million in fiscal 2014 and $3.2 million in fiscal 2013. Sales are attributed
to individual countries based upon the location that the company ships its products to for delivery to
customers.
(2) Of this amount, $26.5 million are attributable to shipments to China in fiscal 2015, with corresponding
amounts of $32.2 million in fiscal 2014 and $42.1 million in fiscal 2013.
For additional segment information, including the geographic location of long-lived assets, see Note 16 in
the consolidated financial statements.
Backlog
Mattress Fabrics Segment
The backlog for mattress fabric is not a reliable predictor of future shipments because the majority of
sales are on a just-in-time basis.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Although it is difficult to predict the amount of backlog that is “firm,” we have reported the portion of the
upholstery fabric backlog from customers with confirmed shipping dates within five weeks of the end of
the fiscal year. On May 3, 2015 the portion of the upholstery fabric backlog with confirmed shipping
dates prior to June 7, 2015, was $9.4 million, all of which are expected to be filled early during fiscal
2016, as compared to $9.1 million as of the end of fiscal 2014 (for confirmed shipping dates prior to
June 1, 2014).
13
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to risks and uncertainties. In addition to the matters described above under
“Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information,” set forth below are some of the risks
and uncertainties that could cause a material adverse change in our results of operations or financial
condition.
Continued economic weakness could negatively affect our sales and earnings.
Overall demand for our products depends upon consumer demand for furniture and bedding, which is
subject to variations in the general economy. Because purchases of furniture or bedding are discretionary
purchases for most individuals and businesses, demand for these products is sometimes more easily
influenced by economic trends than demand for other products. Economic downturns can affect consumer
spending habits and demand for home furnishings, which reduces the demand for our products and
therefore can cause a decrease in our sales and earnings. Continuing weak economic conditions have
caused a decrease in consumer spending and demand for home furnishings, including goods that
incorporate our products. If these conditions persist, our business will be negatively affected.
It has been challenging to maintain and increase sales levels in the upholstery fabrics segment.
Increased competition and fragmentation of the upholstery fabrics business, including a dramatic shift to
imported fabrics and resulting price deflation for upholstery fabrics, have led to a significant reduction in
the size of our upholstery business. Opportunities for growth and profitability gains for this segment are
encouraging, but there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain or consistently grow this business
in the future.
Greater reliance on offshore operations and foreign sources of products or raw materials increases
the likelihood of disruptions to our supply chain or our ability to deliver products to our customers
on a timely basis.
We rely significantly on operations in distant locations, particularly China, and in addition we have been
purchasing a significant share of our products and raw materials from offshore sources. At the same time,
our domestic manufacturing capacity for the upholstery fabrics segment has been greatly reduced. These
changes have caused us to rely on a much longer supply chain and on a larger number of suppliers that we
do not control, both of which are inherently subject to greater risks of delay or disruption. In addition,
operations and sourcing in foreign areas are subject to the risk of changing local governmental rules,
taxes, changes in import rules or customs, potential political unrest, or other threats that could disrupt or
increase the costs of operating in foreign areas or sourcing products overseas. Changes in the value of the
U.S. dollar versus other currencies can affect our financial results because a significant portion of our
operations are located outside the United States. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies
can have a negative impact on our sales of products produced in those countries. Any of the risks
associated with foreign operations and sources could cause unanticipated increases in operating costs or
disruptions in business, which could negatively impact our ultimate financial results.
14
We may have difficulty managing the outsourcing arrangements being used for products and
services.
We rely on outside sources for various products and services, including yarn and other raw materials,
greige (unfinished) fabrics, finished fabrics, and services such as weaving and finishing. Increased
reliance on outsourcing lowers our capital investment and fixed costs, but it decreases the amount of
control that we have over certain elements of our production capacity. Interruptions in our ability to
obtain raw materials or other required products or services from our outside suppliers on a timely and cost
effective basis, especially if alternative suppliers cannot be immediately obtained, could disrupt our
production and damage our financial results.
Write-offs or write-downs of assets would result in a decrease in our earnings and shareholders’
equity.
The company has long-lived assets, consisting mainly of property, plant and equipment and goodwill.
ASC Topic 360 establishes an impairment accounting model for long-lived assets such as property, plant,
and equipment and requires the company to assess for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recovered. ASC Topic 350 requires
that goodwill be tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recovered. Although no material write-downs were
experienced in the past several fiscal years, there is no assurance that future write-downs of fixed assets or
goodwill will not occur if business conditions deteriorate.
Changes in the price, availability, and quality of raw materials could increase our costs or cause
production delays and sales interruptions, which would result in decreased earnings.
We depend upon outside suppliers for most of our raw material needs, and we rely upon outside suppliers
for component materials such as yarn and unfinished fabrics, as well as for certain services such as
finishing and weaving. Fluctuations in the price, availability, and quality of these goods and services
could have a negative effect on our production costs and ability to meet the demands of our customers,
which would affect our ability to generate sales and earnings. In many cases, we are not able to pass
through increased costs of raw materials or increased production costs to our customers through price
increases. In particular, many of our basic raw materials are petrochemical products or are produced from
such products. For this reason, our material costs are especially sensitive to changes in prices for
petrochemicals and the underlying price of oil. Increases in prices for oil, petrochemical products or other
raw materials and services provided by outside suppliers could significantly increase our costs and
negatively affect earnings. Increases in market prices for certain fibers and yarns had a material adverse
impact on our profit margins during fiscal 2011 and 2012. Although our raw material costs were lower
during our three most recent fiscal years, higher raw material prices could have a negative effect on our
profits in the future.
Increases in energy costs would increase our operating costs and could adversely affect earnings.
Higher prices for electricity, natural gas, and fuel increase our production and shipping costs. A
significant shortage, increased prices, or interruptions in the availability of these energy sources would
increase the costs of producing and delivering products to our customers, and would be likely to adversely
affect our earnings. In many cases, we are not able to pass along the full extent of increases in our
production costs to customers through price increases. Energy costs have varied significantly during
recent fiscal years, and remain a volatile element of our costs. Further increases in energy costs could
have a negative effect on our earnings.
15
Business difficulties or failures of large customers could result in a decrease in our sales and
earnings.
We currently have several customers that account for a substantial portion of our sales. In the mattress
fabrics segment, several large bedding manufacturers have large market shares and comprise a significant
portion of our mattress fabric sales, with Serta Simmons Holdings, LLC accounting for approximately
23% of consolidated net sales, and Tempur Sealy International, Inc. accounting for approximately 8% of
consolidated net sales, in fiscal 2015. In the upholstery fabrics segment, La-Z-Boy Incorporated
accounted for approximately 13% of consolidated net sales during fiscal 2015, and several other large
furniture manufacturers comprised a significant portion of sales. A business failure or other significant
financial difficulty by one or more of our major customers, or the loss of one or more of these customers,
could cause a significant loss in sales, an adverse effect on our earnings, and difficulty in collection of our
trade accounts receivable.
Loss of market share due to competition would result in declines in sales and could result in losses
or decreases in earnings.
Our business is highly competitive, and in particular the upholstery fabric industry is fragmented and is
experiencing an increase in the number of competitors. As a result, we face significant competition from a
large number of competitors, both foreign and domestic. We compete with many other manufacturers of
fabric, as well as converters who source fabrics from various producers and market them to manufacturers
of furniture and bedding. In many cases, these fabrics are sourced from foreign suppliers who have a
lower cost structure than the company. The highly competitive nature of our business means we are
constantly subject to the risk of losing market share. As a result of increased competition, there have been
deflationary pressures on the prices for many of our products, which make it more difficult to pass along
increased operating costs such as raw materials, energy or labor in the form of price increases and puts
downward pressure on our profit margins. Also, the large number of competitors and wide range of
product offerings in our business can make it more difficult to differentiate our products through design,
styling, finish, and other techniques.
If we fail to anticipate and respond to changes in consumer tastes and fashion trends, our sales and
earnings may decline.
Demand for various types of upholstery fabrics and mattress coverings changes over time due to fashion
trends and changing consumer tastes for furniture and bedding. Our success in marketing our fabrics
depends upon our ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to fashion trends in home
furnishings. If we fail to identify and respond to these changes, our sales of these products may decline. In
addition, incorrect projections about the demand for certain products could cause the accumulation of
excess raw material or finished goods inventory, which could lead to inventory mark-downs and
decreases in earnings.
Increasing dependence on information technology systems comes with specific risks, including
cybersecurity breaches and data leaks, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
We increasingly rely on technology systems and infrastructure. Greater dependence on such systems
heightens the risk of potential vulnerabilities from system failure and malfunction, breakdowns due to
natural disasters, human error, unauthorized access, power loss, and other unforeseen events. Data privacy
breaches by employees and others with or without authorized access to our systems poses risks that
sensitive data may be permanently lost or leaked to the public or other unauthorized persons. With the
growing use and rapid evolution of technology, not limited to cloud-based computing and mobile devices,
there are additional risks of unintentional data leaks. There is also the risk of our exposure to theft of
confidential information, intentional vandalism, industrial espionage, and a variety of cyber-attacks that
could compromise our internal technology system and infrastructure, or result in data leakage in-house or
16
at our third-party providers and business partners. Failures of technology or related systems, or an
improper release of confidential information, could damage our business or subject us to unexpected
liabilities.
We are subject to litigation and environmental regulations that could adversely impact our sales
and earnings.
We have been, and in the future may be, a party to legal proceedings and claims, including environmental
matters, product liability, and employment disputes, some of which claim significant damages. We face
the continual business risk of exposure to claims that our business operations have caused personal injury
or property damage. We maintain insurance against product liability claims and in some cases have
indemnification agreements with regard to environmental claims, but there can be no assurance that these
arrangements will continue to be available on acceptable terms or that such arrangements will be adequate
for liabilities actually incurred. Given the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that
claims against the company will not have a material adverse impact on our earnings or financial
condition. We are also subject to various laws and regulations in our business, including those relating to
environmental protection and the discharge of materials into the environment. We could incur substantial
costs as a result of noncompliance with or liability for cleanup or other costs or damages under
environmental laws or other regulations.
We must comply with a number of governmental regulations applicable to our business, and
changes in those regulations could adversely affect our business.
Our products and raw materials are and will continue to be subject to regulation in the United States by
various federal, state, and local regulatory authorities. In addition, other governments and agencies in
other jurisdictions regulate the manufacture, sale, and distribution of our products and raw materials.
Also, rules and restrictions regarding the importation of fabrics and other materials, including custom
duties, quotas and other regulations, are continually changing. Environmental laws, labor laws, tax
regulations, and other regulations continually affect our business. All of these rules and regulations can
and do change from time to time, which can increase our costs or require us to make changes in our
manufacturing processes, product mix, sources of products and raw materials, or distribution. Changes in
the rules and regulations applicable to our business may negatively impact our sales and earnings.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
17
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters are located in High Point, North Carolina. As of the end of fiscal 2015, we owned or
leased fourteen active manufacturing, and distribution facilities and our corporate headquarters. The
following is a list of our principal administrative, manufacturing and distribution facilities. The
manufacturing facilities and distribution centers are organized by segment.
Location
Principal Use
• Administrative:
High Point, North Carolina (1)
• Mattress Fabrics:
Stokesdale, North Carolina
Stokesdale, North Carolina
High Point, North Carolina (1)
High Point, North Carolina
Summerfield, North Carolina
St. Jerome, Quebec, Canada
• Upholstery Fabrics:
Anderson, South Carolina
Burlington, North Carolina
Shanghai, China
Shanghai, China
Shanghai, China
Shanghai, China
Shanghai, China
Upholstery fabric division
offices and corporate
headquarters
Manufacturing, distribution,
and division offices
Warehouse
Manufacturing
Warehouse and offices
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Finished goods distribution
Manufacturing and offices
Manufacturing and offices
Manufacturing and warehousing
Manufacturing and warehousing
Warehouse
____________________________________________________
(1) Includes all options to renew.
Approx.
Total Area
(Sq. Ft.)
Expiration
of Lease
29,812
2025
230,000
Owned
56,950
63,522
65,886
39,320
202,500
99,000
132,000
68,677
89,857
89,861
64,583
48,610
2017
2023
2017
2018
Owned
Owned
2016
2018
2018
2017
2017
2016
We believe that our facilities are in good condition, well-maintained and suitable and adequate for present
utilization. In the upholstery fabrics segment, we have the ability to source upholstery fabric from outside
suppliers to meet current and expected demand trends and further increase our output of finished goods. This
ability to source upholstery fabric is part of our long-term strategy to have a low-cost platform that is
scalable, but not capital intensive. In the mattress fabrics segment, management has estimated that it is
currently performing at near capacity. Also, we have the ability to source additional mattress fabric from
outside suppliers to further increase our ultimate output of finished goods.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our legal proceedings are described more fully in Note 11 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
18
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
PART II
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
c/o Computershare Investor Services
Post Office Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842
(800) 254-5196
(781) 575-2879 (Foreign shareholders)
www.computershare.com/investor
Stock Listing
Culp, Inc. common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol CFI.
As of May 3, 2015, Culp, Inc. had approximately 2,890 shareholders based on the number of holders of
record and an estimate of individual participants represented by security position listings.
Analyst Coverage
These analysts cover Culp, Inc.:
Raymond, James & Associates - Budd Bugatch, CFA
Value Line – Craig Sirois
Sidoti & Company, LLC – James Fronda
Stifel Financial Corp - John A. Baugh, CFA
Dividends and Share Repurchases; Sales of Unregistered Securities
Share Repurchases
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)
(b)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
-
Average Price
Paid per Share
$ -
(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
(d)
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (1)
-
$4,256,235
Period
February 2, 2015 to
March 8, 2015
March 9, 2015
April 5, 2015
to
-
$ -
-
$4,256,235
April 6, 2015 to May
3, 2015
-
$ -
-
$4,256,235
Total
-
$ -
-
$4,256,235
(1) On February 25, 2014, we announced that our board of directors approved an authorization for us
to acquire up to $5.0 million of our common stock.
19
Dividends
Fiscal 2015
During fiscal 2015, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $4.9 million represented a special
cash dividend payment in the first quarter of $0.40 per share, and $2.7 million represented our regularly
quarterly cash dividend payments ranging from $0.05 to $0.06 per share.
Fiscal 2014
During fiscal 2014, we paid quarterly dividends totaling $2.2 million that ranged from $0.04 to $0.05 per
share.
Fiscal 2013
During fiscal 2013, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $6.1 million represented a special
cash dividend payment of $0.50 per share, and $1.5 million represented our regular quarterly dividend
payments of $0.03 per share.
On June 18, 2015, we announced that our board of directors approved the payment of a special cash
dividend of $0.40 per share and a regular cash dividend payment of $0.06 per share. These dividend
payments are payable on July 15, 2015, to shareholders of record as of July 1, 2015.
Future dividend payments are subject to Board approval and may be adjusted at the Board’s discretion as
business needs or market conditions change.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during fiscal 2015, 2014, or 2013.
Performance Comparison
The following graph shows changes over the five fiscal years ending May 3, 2015 in the value of $100
invested in (1) the common stock of the company, (2) the Hemscott Textile Manufacturing Group Index
reported by Standard and Poor’s, consisting of eight companies (including the company) in the textile
industry, and (3) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 at the end of fiscal 2010 and the reinvestment of all
dividends during the periods identified.
20
Market Information
See Item 6, Selected Financial Data, and Selected Quarterly Data in Item 8, for market information
regarding the company’s common stock.
21
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(amounts in thousands, except per share, ratios & other, stock data)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
net sales
cost of sales
gross profit
selling, general, and administrative expenses
restructuring expense
income from operations
interest expense
interest income
other expense
income before income taxes
income taxes
net income
depreciation
weighted average shares outstanding
weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution
PER SHARE DATA
net income per share - basic
net income per share - diluted
dividends per share
book value
BALANCE SHEET DATA
operating working capital (4)
property, plant and equipment, net
total assets
capital expenditures
dividends paid
long-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt and line of credit (1)
shareholders' equity
capital employed (3)
RATIOS & OTHER DATA
gross profit margin
operating income margin
net income margin
effective income tax rate
debt to total capital employed ratio (1)
operating working capital turnover (4)
days sales in receivables
inventory turnover
STOCK DATA
stock price
high
low
close
P/E ratio (2)
high
low
daily average trading volume (shares)
fiscal
2015
fiscal
2014
fiscal
2013
fiscal
2012
fiscal
2011
percent
change
2015/2014
8.0%
6.9%
13.6%
14.4%
0.0%
12.5%
-85.0%
29.0%
-69.0%
20.5%
394.0%
-13.6%
8.7%
0.3%
0.1%
-13.9%
-13.7%
244.4%
7.1%
1.7%
15.0%
6.5%
110.4%
243.9%
-55.9%
6.9%
2.3%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
310,166
254,599
55,567
32,778
-
287,162
238,256
48,906
28,657
-
268,814
219,284
49,530
28,445
-
254,443
214,711
39,732
25,026
-
22,789
20,249
21,085
14,706
64
(622)
391
22,956
7,885
15,071
5,773
12,217
12,422
1.23
1.21
0.62
9.77
41,829
36,078
171,368
11,174
7,579
2,200
119,427
79,184
17.9%
7.3%
4.9%
34.3%
2.8%
7.7
34
6.1
29.19
16.60
26.02
24
14
38.6
427
(482)
1,261
19,043
1,596
17,447
5,312
12,177
12,414
1.43
1.41
0.18
9.12
632
(419)
583
20,289
1,972
18,317
5,115
12,235
12,450
1.50
1.47
0.62
7.82
41,120
31,376
39,228
30,594
160,935
144,706
5,310
2,204
4,986
111,744
77,394
4,457
7,593
7,161
95,583
72,699
17.0%
18.4%
7.1%
6.1%
8.4%
6.4%
7.0
35
6.0
21.10
14.93
18.61
15
11
27.5
7.8%
6.8%
9.7%
9.9%
7.4
31
5.9
18.15
9.00
16.25
12
6
40.9
780
(508)
236
14,198
902
13,296
4,865
12,711
12,866
1.05
1.03
-
7.00
30,596
31,279
144,716
5,919
-
10,012
89,000
67,887
15.6%
5.8%
5.2%
6.4%
14.7%
8.9
36
6.6
11.81
7.05
11.05
11
7
30.6
216,806
179,966
36,840
21,069
28
15,743
881
(240)
40
15,062
(1,102)
16,164
4,372
12,959
13,218
1.25
1.22
-
6.06
23,921
30,296
130,051
6,302
-
11,547
80,341
62,521
17.0%
7.3%
7.5%
(7.3)%
18.5%
8.8
34
6.6
14.10
6.56
10.08
12
5
58.0
(1) Debt includes long-term and current maturities of long-term debt and line of credit.
(2) P/E ratios based on trailing 12-month net income per share.
(3) Capital employed represents long-term and current maturities of long-term debt, lines of credit, current and noncurrent
deferred income tax liabilities, current and long-term income taxes payable, stockholders' equity, offset by cash and cash equivalents,
short-term and long-term investments, current and noncurrent deferred income tax assets, and income taxes receivable.
(4) Operating working capital for this calculation is accounts receivable and inventories, offset by accounts payable-trade and
account payable - capital expenditures.
22
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes and other exhibits included elsewhere in this report.
General
Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Sunday closest to April 30. Fiscal 2015
included 53 weeks. Fiscal 2014 and 2013 each included 52 weeks. Our operations are classified into two
business segments: mattress fabrics and upholstery fabrics. The mattress fabrics segment manufactures,
sources and sells fabrics and mattress covers to bedding manufacturers. The upholstery fabrics segment
sources, manufacturers and sells fabrics primarily to residential furniture manufacturers.
We evaluate the operating performance of our segments based upon income from operations before
certain unallocated corporate expenses, and other non-recurring items. Cost of sales in both segments
include costs to manufacture or source our products, including costs such as raw material and finished
good purchases, direct and indirect labor, overhead and incoming freight charges. Unallocated corporate
expenses primarily represent compensation and benefits for certain executive officers, all costs related to
being a public company, and other miscellaneous expenses.
Executive Summary
Results of Operations
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Net sales
Gross profit
Gross profit margin
SG&A expenses
Income from operations
Operating margin
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net income
Net Sales
$
310,166
$
287,162
55,567
17.9%
32,778
22,789
7.3%
22,956
7,885
15,071
48,906
17.0%
28,657
20,249
7.1%
19,043
1,596
17,447
8.0%
13.6%
5.3%
14.4%
12.5%
2.8%
20.5%
394.0%
(13.6)%
Our net sales for fiscal 2015 increased by 8% compared with fiscal 2014, with mattress fabrics net sales
up 12% and upholstery fabric net sales up 3% over the prior year. Throughout fiscal 2015, we have
continued to execute our strategy with a focus on design creativity, product innovation, and customer
service. This strategic focus has driven our sales performance with key and new customers as we can
offer a wide range of products in both our business segments. In addition, our scalable and flexible
manufacturing platform supports our ability to compete in a fashion-driven business that is always
changing.
The 53 week period in fiscal 2015 compared to the 52 week period in fiscal 2014 also contributed to the
higher net sales.
23
See the Segment Analysis section located in the Results of Operations for further details.
Income Before Income Taxes
The increase in income before income taxes primarily reflects the increases in net sales noted above and
the significant improvement in our mattress fabric segment's operating results in fiscal 2015. Contributing
to the improvement in our mattress fabric segment's operating results were the benefits from our $9.5
million capital expansion project that increased our production capacity, added finishing capabilities, and
improved our overall efficiency and throughput. We also benefited from lower input costs in both of our
business segments, especially during the second half of fiscal 2015. Partially offsetting the improvement
in gross profit was the increase in SG&A expenses due primarily to higher sales and higher incentive
compensation expense reflecting stronger financial results in relation to pre-established performance
targets.
Additionally, income before income taxes for fiscal 2015 was affected by the decrease in other expense in
comparison to fiscal 2014. Other expense was $391,000 and $1.3 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014,
respectively. This decrease was primarily due to more favorable foreign currency exchange rates
associated with operations located in China for fiscal 2015 compared with the same period a year ago.
Also, a non-recurring charge of $206,000 was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 for the
settlement of litigation relating to the environmental claims associated with a closed facility, and there
was no comparable charge recorded in fiscal 2015.
See the Segment Analysis section located in the Results of Operations for further details.
Income Taxes
We reported income tax expense of $7.9 million or 34.3% of income before income taxes for fiscal 2015,
compared to income tax expense of $1.6 million or 8.4% of income before income taxes for fiscal 2014.
The income tax expense reported in fiscal 2014 included an income tax benefit of $5.4 million to record
the U.S. income tax effects of the undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries located in China,
which was treated as a discrete event in the third quarter of fiscal 2014, as it pertained to a change in
judgment on prior period's accumulated earnings and profits. There was no comparable income tax
benefit recorded in fiscal 2015.
See the Income Taxes section located in the Results of Operations and Note 9 of the consolidated
financial statements for further details.
Liquidity
At May 3, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $39.7 million and
exceeded our total debt (all of which is classified in current maturities of long-term debt) of $2.2 million.
We currently have one remaining annual $2.2 million principal payment due on our long-term debt in
August 2015.
The $39.7 million is up from $35.6 million at the end of last fiscal year despite significant uses of cash in
fiscal 2015. These included $10.5 million on capital expenditures, $8.3 million on dividend payments and
common stock repurchases, $2.7 million on payments on our long-term debt and lines of credit, and $1.7
million on long-term investment purchases associated with our Rabbi Trust that is partially funding our
deferred compensation plan.
Our net cash provided by operating activities of $26.1 million for fiscal 2015, increased 29% compared
with $20.2 million for fiscal 2014. This increase is primarily due to the increase in cash flow from
earnings and improved working capital management in both our business segments.
24
Dividend Program
During fiscal 2015, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $4.9 million represented a special
cash dividend payment in the first quarter of $0.40 per share, and $2.7 million represented our regularly
quarterly cash dividend payments ranging from $0.05 to $0.06 per share.
During fiscal 2014, we paid quarterly dividends totaling $2.2 million that ranged from $0.04 to $0.05 per
share.
On June 18, 2015, we announced that our board of directors approved the payment of a special cash
dividend of $0.40 per share and a regular cash dividend payment of $0.06 per share. These dividend
payments are payable on July 15, 2015, to shareholders of record as of July 1, 2015.
Future dividend payments are subject to board approval and may be adjusted at the Board’s discretion as
business needs or market conditions change.
Common Stock Repurchases
On February 25, 2014, we announced that our board of directors approved an increase to $5.0 million in
the authorization for us to acquire our common stock. Under the common stock repurchase program,
shares may be purchased from time to time in open market transactions, block trades, through plans
established under the Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, or otherwise. The amount of shares
purchased and the timing of such purchases will be based on working capital requirements, market and
general business conditions, and other factors including alternative investment opportunities.
During fiscal 2015, we purchased 43,014 shares of our common stock at a cost of $745,000, all of which
were purchased in the first and second quarters. At May 3, 2015, we had $4.3 million available for
additional repurchases of our common stock.
During fiscal 2014, there were no repurchases of our common stock.
Since June 2011, and including the special and regular dividends paid in July, we have returned
approximately $35 million to shareholders in the form of regular quarterly and special dividends and
share repurchases.
25
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain items in our consolidated statements of net income as a percentage
of net sales.
Fiscal Fiscal
2014
100.0%
83.0
17.0
10.0
7.1
(0.1)
0.4
6.6
8.4
6.1%
2015
100.0%
82.1
17.9
10.6
7.3
(0.2)
0.1
7.4
34.3
4.9%
Fiscal
2013
100.0%
81.6
18.4
10.6
7.8
0.0
0.2
7.5
9.7
6.8%
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Income from operations
Interest expense, net
Other expense
Income before income taxes
Income taxes *
Net income
* Calculated as a percentage of income before income taxes.
2015 compared with 2014
Segment Analysis
Mattress Fabrics Segment
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Net sales
Gross profit
Gross profit margin
SG&A expenses
Income from operations
Operating margin
Net Sales
$
179,739
$
32,877
18.3%
11,206
21,671
12.1%
160,705
27,477
17.1%
9,962
17,515
10.9%
11.8%
19.7%
7.0%
12.5%
23.7%
11.0%
The increase in mattress fabric net sales reflects our ability to capitalize on the growing consumer demand
for better designed bedding products. In response to this demand trend, design and innovation have been
our top strategic priorities, allowing us to keep pace with latest fashion trends and meet customer style
preferences. We have continued to expand our design team and have invested in the latest technical
software and website development to support and strengthen our brand. Our product mix of mattress
fabrics and sewn covers across all price points and style trends has allowed us to deliver a full design
package from fabric to finished covers. Additionally, we have a scalable manufacturing platform and
reactive capacity that supports our ability to deliver a diverse product mix in line with customer demand.
Also contributing to this increase in net sales as compared to the prior year was the fact that fiscal 2015
included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in fiscal 2014.
26
Gross Profit and Operating Income
The increase in gross profit and operating income for the mattress fabric segment reflected the increase in
net sales noted above, as well as the improvement in operating efficiencies as compared to the prior year.
The year over year operational improvement resulted largely from the benefits of our $9.5 million capital
expansion project that increased our production capacity, added finishing capabilities, and improved our
overall efficiency and throughput. As a result of this expansion plan, we have made steady progress in our
operating performance since the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Our operating margin was 14.7% in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to 8.6% in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. We also benefited from
lower input costs, primarily in the second half of fiscal 2015.
Another factor contributing to the increased operating profit in our mattress fabric segment, especially in
the last half of fiscal 2015, was significant operational improvement in the mattress cover business. The
significant labor inefficiencies and unfavorable product mix, along with severe weather conditions, that
pressured performance in the last half of fiscal 2014 did not impact the last half of fiscal 2015.
Partially offsetting this gross profit improvement was an increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal 2015
compared to fiscal 2014.The increase is primarily due to the increase in net sales noted above and higher
incentive compensation expense reflecting stronger financial results in relation to pre-established
performance targets in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014.
Segment Assets
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, goodwill, a non-
compete agreement and customer relationships associated with an acquisition.
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Accounts receivable
and inventory
Property, plant & equipment
Goodwill
Non-compete agreement
Customer Relationships
$
41,328
$
36,229
33,773
11,462
979
766
29,040
11,462
1,041
817
14.1%
16.3%
0.0%
(6.0)%
(6.2)%
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
Accounts receivable and inventory increased due to the increased business volume in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2015 compared to the same period a year ago. Net sales for the mattress fabric segment increased
10.4% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
Property, Plant & Equipment
The $33.8 million at May 3, 2015, represents property, plant and equipment of $23.8 million and $10.0
million located in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The $29.0 million at April 27, 2014, represents
property, plant, and equipment of $20.6 million and $8.4 million located in the U.S. and Canada,
respectively.
27
The increase in property, plant, and equipment for this segment is due to the capital expansion project
noted above, offset by depreciation expense.
Non-Compete Agreement and Customer Relationships
The decreases in carrying values of our non-compete agreement and customer relationships at May 3,
2015, are primarily due to amortization expense in fiscal 2015.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Net Sales
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Non U.S. Produced
U.S Produced
Total
$
$
119,177
92%
$
115,991
11,250
8%
10,466
92%
8%
2.7%
7.5%
130,427
100%
$
126,457
100%
3.1%
The increase in net sales for our upholstery fabrics segment reflect our strategic focus on design and
product innovation. Our 100% owned China platform provides significant manufacturing flexibility to
produce a diverse product mix of fabric styles and price points, which has allowed us to meet changing
customer demand in line with current furniture style trends. As a result, we have been able to diversify
our customer base, including the hospitality market and the lifestyle retail category. Additionally, we
experienced higher demand for cut and sewn kits in fiscal 2015, which further supported our net sales for
this year.
Also contributing to this increase in net sales as compared to the prior year was the fact that fiscal 2015
included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks in fiscal 2014.
Gross Profit and Operating Income
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Gross profit
$
Gross profit margin
SG&A expenses
Income from operations
Operating margin
22,690
17.4%
14,562
8,128
6.2%
$
21,429
16.9%
13,393
8,036
6.4%
5.9%
3.0%
8.7%
1.1%
(3.1)%
28
Our upholstery segment’s gross profit and gross profit margin have increased compared to the same
period a year ago due primarily to the increase in net sales noted above and higher profit margins
achieved on certain product introductions. We also benefited from lower input costs, especially in the
second half of fiscal 2015. These lower input costs helped to partially offset higher operational costs
associated with our operations in China.
This business segment's operating income slightly increased and operating margins slightly decreased in
fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. These trends are due to the increase in gross profit noted above and
the increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014.The increase in SG&A expenses in
fiscal 2015 is primarily due to the increase in net sales.
As previously announced, at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2015 we closed our finished goods
warehouse and distribution facility located in Poznan, Poland, primarily as a result of ongoing economic
weakness in Europe. As a result, we incurred a charge of approximately $200,000 for closing related costs
during fiscal 2015. Currently, we remain very interested in developing business in Europe, and we are
assessing the best strategy for selling upholstery fabric into this market as business conditions improve.
Segment Assets
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventory, and property, plant, and equipment.
(dollars in thousands)
May 3, 2015
April 27, 2014
% Change
Accounts receivable
and inventory
$
29,905
$
31,854
Property, plant & equipment
1,467
1,573
(6.1)%
(6.7)%
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
At May 3, 2015, accounts receivable for this segment was $11.9 million compared with $12.8 million as
of April 27, 2014. This decrease is due to increased sales with customers with discounted payment terms
in fiscal 2015 compared with fiscal 2014, which resulted in customers paying off receivables more
quickly.
At May 3, 2015, inventory for this segment was $18.0 million compared with $19.0 million as of
April 27, 2014. This decrease is primarily due to improved inventory management and the reduction of
inventory associated with the closure of our Culp Europe operation located in Poland.
Property, Plant & Equipment
The $1.5 million at May 3, 2015, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S. of
$848,000 and located in China of $619,000. The $1.6 million at April 27, 2014, represents property,
plant, and equipment located in the U.S. of $957,000, located in China of $572,000, and located in Poland
of $44,000.
29
Other Income Statement Categories
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses for the company as a whole were $32.8 million for fiscal 2015 compared with $28.7
million for fiscal 2014. SG&A as a percent of net sales was 10.6% and 10.0% in fiscal 2015 and 2014,
respectively. The increase is SG&A expenses is primarily due to the increase in net sales noted above and
higher incentive compensation expense reflecting stronger financial results in relation to pre-established
performance targets in fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $64,000 for fiscal 2015 compared with $427,000 for fiscal 2014. This trend reflects
lower outstanding balances of long-term debt in fiscal 2015 compared with fiscal 2014. Also, interest
expense was reduced by $171,000 for interest costs associated with the mattress fabric segment capital
expansion project that were capitalized during fiscal 2015. These interest costs will be depreciated over
the related assets' useful lives. No interest costs were capitalized in fiscal 2014.
Interest Income
Interest income was $622,000 in fiscal 2015 compared with $482,000 for fiscal 2014. This trend reflects
higher cash and cash equivalent and short-term investment balances held with foreign subsidiaries during
fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances held
by our foreign subsidiaries earn higher interest rates as compared to funds held in the United States.
Other Expense
Other expense was $391,000 million for fiscal 2015 compared with $1.3 million for fiscal 2014. This
decrease was primarily due to more favorable foreign currency exchange rates associated with operations
located in China for fiscal 2015 compared with the same period a year ago. We recorded a foreign
currency exchange gain of $241,000 in fiscal 2015 compared to a foreign currency exchange loss of
$571,000 in fiscal 2014 regarding our operations located in China.
We have been able to mitigate the effects of foreign exchange rate fluctuations associated with our
subsidiaries domiciled in Canada and Poland through the maintenance of a natural hedge by keeping a
balance of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Although we
will continue to try and maintain this natural hedge, there is no assurance that we will be able to continue
to do so in the future reporting periods.
Also, a non-recurring charge of $206,000 was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 for the
settlement of litigation relating to the environmental claims associated with a closed facility, and there
was no comparable charge recorded in fiscal 2015.
Income Taxes
Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. During the ordinary
course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination
is uncertain. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach as prescribed by ASC
Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” This approach requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial
statements or income tax returns. Using the enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which
differences are expected to reverse, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
differences between financial reporting and tax basis of an asset or liability. If a change in the effective
30
tax rate to be applied to a timing difference is determined to be appropriate, it will affect the provision for
income taxes during the period that the determination is made.
Effective Income Tax Rate
We recorded income tax expense of $7.9 million, or 34.3% of income before income tax expense, in
fiscal 2015 compared with income tax expense of $1.6 million, or 8.4% of income before income tax
expense, in fiscal 2014. The following schedule summarizes the principal differences between income tax
expense at the federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated
financial statements:
federal income tax rate
foreign tax rate differential
increase in liability for uncertain tax positions
undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries
change in valuation allowance
other
Deferred Income Taxes – Valuation Allowance
Summary
2015
34.0%
(6.7)
3.7
3.0
(0.2)
0.5
34.3%
2014
34.0%
(7.2)
4.3
(26.3)
0.1
3.5
8.4%
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation
allowance is required. ASC Topic 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance
should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not”
standard with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Since the
company operates in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on a jurisdiction-
by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law. Based on our assessment at May 3,
2015, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $922,000, of which $561,000 pertained to certain U.S.
state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and $361,000 pertained to loss carryforwards associated
with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland. Based on our assessment at April 27, 2014, we
recorded a partial valuation allowance of $977,000, of which $666,000 pertained to certain U.S. state net
operating loss carryforwards and credits and $311,000 pertained to loss carryforwards associated with our
Culp Europe operation located in Poland.
No valuation allowance was recorded against our net deferred tax assets associated with our operations
located in China and Canada at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively.
United States
Our net deferred tax asset regarding our U.S. operations includes U.S. loss carryforwards totaling $32.2
million, $45.7 million, and $50.7 million at May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014, and April 28, 2013,
respectively.
Fiscal 2013
Due to the favorable results of our multi-year restructuring process in our upholstery fabric operations and
key acquisitions and capital investments made in our mattress fabric operations, our U.S operations'
financial results started to improve in fiscal 2011 and this improvement continued through the second
quarter of fiscal 2013. Our U.S. operations earned a pre-tax income on a cumulative three-year basis as of
April 29, 2012 (the end of our fiscal 2012) of $11.9 million and an additional $3.4 million through the
second quarter of fiscal 2013.
31
This continued earnings improvement from our U.S. operations was primarily due to the operating
performance of our mattress fabric operations. Through the second quarter of fiscal 2013, our mattress
fabric operations had net sales that totaled $77.7 million, an increase of 15% compared with $67.4 million
through the second quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, our mattress fabric operations reported operating
income of $10.3 million through the second quarter of fiscal 2013, an increase of 49% compared with
$7.0 million through the second quarter of fiscal 2012. These improved results through the second quarter
of fiscal 2013, which were better than expected, were attributed to the evolution of the bedding industry
into a more decorative business with growing consumer demand for better bedding and a higher quality
mattress fabric, and the stabilization of raw material prices.
Based on the positive evidence at the end of our second quarter of fiscal 2013, as supported by our
cumulative earnings history, current and expected earnings improvement driven by our U.S. mattress
fabric operations, and the significant source of U.S. taxable income from the undistributed earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries (see separate section below), we recorded an income tax benefit of $12.2 million to
reverse substantially all of the valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets. In the third
quarter of fiscal 2013, we recorded an income tax charge of $103,000, due to a change in our second
quarter estimate of the recoverability of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards.
After this valuation allowance reversal of $12.1 million, we had a remaining valuation allowance against
our U.S. net deferred tax assets totaling $722,000 as of April 28, 2013. This valuation allowance
pertained to certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits in which it is “more likely than
not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits would not be realized prior to their
respective expiration dates.
Fiscal 2014
At April 27, 2014, we had a remaining valuation allowance against our U.S net deferred tax assets
totaling $666,000. This valuation allowance pertained to U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and
credits in which it is “more likely than not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and
credits would not be realized prior to their respective expiration dates. In fiscal 2014, we recorded an
income tax benefit of $56,000 that reduced our valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax
assets. This income tax benefit pertained to a change in estimate of the recoverability of our U.S. state net
loss operating carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2014.
Fiscal 2015
At May 3, 2015, we had a remaining valuation allowance against our U.S net deferred tax assets totaling
$561,000. This valuation allowance pertained to U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits in
which it is “more likely than not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits would
not be realized prior to their respective expiration dates. In fiscal 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit
of $105,000 that reduced our valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets that we
concluded were more likely than not to be realized. This income tax benefit pertained to a change in
estimate of the recoverability of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2015.
Poland
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we established Culp Europe, a wholly-owned subsidiary located in
Poland. Due to the initial start up costs of setting up this operation and the current state of the European
economy, this operation had a history of cumulative pre-tax losses.
32
Based on the negative evidence, as supported by our cumulative pre-tax loss history and the short
carryforward period of 5 years imposed by the Polish government, we recorded a full valuation allowance
against Culp Europe’s net deferred tax assets commencing in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As of May
3, 2015, we recorded a full valuation allowance against Culp Europe’s net deferred tax assets totaling
$361,000.
Change in Valuation Allowance
In fiscal 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit of $55,000 for a reduction of our valuation allowance.
This $55,000 reduction represents an income tax benefit of $105,000 for a change in estimate of the
recoverability of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards, partially offset by an income tax charge
of $50,000 for an increase in the full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets associated
with our Culp Europe operations located in Poland.
In fiscal 2014, we recorded an income tax charge of $14,000 for an increase of our valuation allowance.
The $14,000 increase represents an income tax charge of $70,000 for an increase in the full valuation
allowance against our net deferred tax assets associated with our Culp Europe operations located in
Poland, partially offset by an income tax benefit of $56,000 for a change in estimate of the recoverability
of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2014.
In fiscal 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $11.8 million for the reduction of our valuation
allowance. This $11.8 million decrease represents a $12.1 million income tax benefit pertaining to a
change in judgment about the future realization of our U.S. net deferred tax assets, partially offset by an
income tax charge of $241,000 for the establishment of a full valuation allowance against our net deferred
tax assets associated with our Culp Europe operations located in Poland.
Deferred Income Taxes – Undistributed Earnings from Foreign Subsidiaries
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we assess whether the undistributed earnings from our foreign
subsidiaries will be reinvested indefinitely or eventually distributed to our U.S. parent company. ASC
Topic 740 requires that a deferred tax liability should be recorded for undistributed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries that will not be reinvested indefinitely. Also, we assess the recognition of U.S. foreign
income tax credits associated with foreign withholding and income tax payments and whether it is more-
likely-than-not that our foreign income tax credits will not be realized. If it is determined that any foreign
income tax credits need to be recognized or it is more-likely-than-not our foreign income tax credits will
not be realized, an adjustment to our provision for income taxes will be recognized at that time.
Fiscal 2013
Prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2013, it was management’s intention to indefinitely reinvest all of our
undistributed foreign earnings. Accordingly, no deferred tax liability had been recorded in connection
with the future repatriation of these earnings.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we assessed the financial requirements of our U.S. parent
company and foreign subsidiaries and determined that our undistributed earnings from our foreign
subsidiaries totaling $55.6 million would not be reinvested indefinitely and would be eventually
distributed to our U.S. parent company. The financial requirements of the U.S. parent company changed
due to a decision to return cash to its shareholders through dividend payments and common stock
repurchases. Also, in order to keep up with the recent growth in consumer demand for better bedding and
a higher quality mattress fabric, it was our intention to continue our investment in our domestic mattress
fabric operations. As a result of this assessment, we recorded a deferred tax liability and corresponding
income tax charge of $6.6 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and an additional $400,000 in
the last half of fiscal 2013.
33
At April 28, 2013, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $56.7
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $7.0 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $22.0 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $15.0 million.
Fiscal 2014
During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, our operations in China achieved positive accumulated earnings
and profits for both U.S. income tax and financial reporting purposes for the first time since we
determined our undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries would not be reinvested indefinitely in
the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As a result, we recorded an income tax benefit of $5.4 million to
recognize U.S. foreign income tax credits of $9.9 million offset by the U.S. income tax effects of the
undistributed earnings from our China operations and foreign withholding taxes totaling $4.5 million.
This $5.4 million income tax benefit was treated as a discrete event in which the full income tax benefits
of this adjustment were recorded in the third quarter and full fiscal year 2014, as it pertained to a change
in judgment on prior periods’ accumulated earnings and profits associated with our subsidiaries located in
China.
In addition, an income tax charge of $352,000 was recorded during fiscal 2014 for the U.S. income tax
effects of the undistributed earnings and foreign withholding taxes incurred in fiscal 2014 from our
Canadian operations and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 from our China operations.
At April 27, 2014, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $72.8
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $2.0 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $28.1 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $26.1 million.
Fiscal 2015
An income tax charge of $695,000 was recorded during fiscal 2015 for the U.S. income tax effects of the
undistributed earnings and foreign withholding taxes incurred in fiscal 2015 from our Canadian and China
operations.
At May 3, 2015, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $85.2
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $1.7 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $32.4 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $30.7 million.
Income Taxes Paid
We reported income tax expense of $7.9 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Currently, we are not paying income taxes in the United States due to our loss carryforwards that totaled
$32.2 million at May 3, 2015. However, we did have income tax payments of $4.8 million in fiscal 2015,
$3.0 million in 2014, and $2.8 million in 2013. Our income tax payments are associated with our
subsidiaries located in China and Canada.
34
2014 compared with 2013
Segment Analysis
Mattress Fabrics Segment
(dollars in thousands)
April 27, 2014
April 28, 2013
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Net sales
Gross profit
Gross profit margin
SG&A expenses
Income from operations
Operating margin
Net Sales
$
160,705
27,477
17.1%
9,962
17,515
10.9%
$
154,014
29,546
19.2%
9,646
19,900
12.9%
4.3%
(7.0)%
(11.0)%
3.3%
(12.0)%
(15.5)%
The increase in net sales was due to our ability to capitalize on the growing consumer demand for better
designed bedding products. The mattress industry evolved into a much more decorative business, with
customers being more selective in their fabric choices. In response to this demand trend, we increased our
design staff, expanded our design capabilities and technical expertise to develop a wide range of fabric
choices across all price points. Additionally, our scalable manufacturing platform and reactive capacity
supported our ability to deliver a diverse product mix in line with demand trends.
Sales and Marketing Initiatives
Joint Product, Sales and Marketing Agreement
In order to expand our product offerings and keep pace with the changing customer demand trends within
the bedding industry, we entered into a joint product development, sales and marketing agreement with A.
Lava & Son Co. (Lava) on May 21, 2012. This agreement formed a new business named Culp-Lava
Applied Sewn Solutions (CLASS) and has provided us an opportunity to enter the business of designing,
producing, and marketing sewn mattress covers. As a result, we are able to leverage our design
capabilities and expand our product offerings from mattress fabrics to finished covers. In connection with
this agreement, Lava is providing us with technical assistance and know-how for this business and is
working with us on the design, sales and marketing of sewn mattress covers.
Pursuant to the agreement, the new business was fully funded and 100% owned by us. We have
established a manufacturing facility located in Stokesdale, North Carolina, that is adjacent to our mattress
fabric headquarters. We have responsibility for all operating control of the new business, including capital
expenditures and production and operating costs.
35
Bodet & Horst
On May 8, 2013, we entered into an asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst GMBH
& Co. KG and certain affiliates (“Bodet & Horst”) that provided for, among other things, the purchase of
equipment and certain other assets from Bodet & Horst and the restructuring of prior consulting and non-
compete agreements pursuant to an earlier asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst
dated August 11, 2008. This agreement was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with
ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. We agreed with Bodet & Horst to replace the prior non-compete
agreement that prevented us from selling certain mattress fabrics and products to a leading manufacturer,
which now allows us to make such sales. In addition, the prior consulting and non-compete agreement,
under which Bodet & Horst agreed not to sell most mattress fabrics in North America, was replaced,
expanded and extended pursuant to the new asset purchase and consulting agreement.
The purchase price for the equipment and the certain other assets noted below was $2.6 million in cash.
Direct acquisition costs related to this business combination totaled $83,000.
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired based on their fair
values:
(dollars in thousands)
Equipment
Non-compete agreement
Customer relationships
$
Fair Value
890
882
868
2,640
$
The company recorded its non-compete at its fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation model.
The company recorded its customer relationships at its fair value based on a multi-period excess earnings
valuation model. This non-compete agreement is being amortized on a straight line basis over the fifteen
year life of the agreement. The customer relationships are being amortized on a straight line basis over
their useful life of seventeen years. The equipment are being amortized on a straight line basis over its
useful life of seven years.
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the years ending April 27, 2014
and April 28, 2013 have been prepared as if the acquisition of Bodet & Horst had occurred on April 30,
2012:
(dollars in thousands)
Net Sales
Income from operations
Net income
Years ended
April 27, 2014
$ 287,162
20,249
17,447
(Unaudited)
April 28, 2013
$ 278,681
21,048
18,208
Net income per share, basic
1.43
1.49
Net income per share, diluted
1.41
1.46
36
Gross Profit and Operating Income
Although our net sales increased over the prior fiscal year as noted above, our profitability declined in
fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. This decline was due to several factors, most of which occurred in
the second half of fiscal 2014. Our operating results for the third quarter were affected by higher than
expected transition costs in CLASS, as well as higher than expected sampling and development costs in
support of new customer roll-outs in calendar 2014. Additionally, severe weather conditions experienced
in many parts of our country during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 affected our mattress fabric locations
with at least a week of lost production. We also experienced production throughput and operating
efficiency challenges during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 as we absorbed new mattress cover
placements and experienced higher than expected demand for premium decorative knitted mattress
fabrics.
These operational inefficiencies were resolved in fiscal 2015 as a result of the $9.5 million capital
expansion project noted above.
Segment Assets
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventory, a non-compete agreement and customer
relationships associated with an acquisition, goodwill, and property, plant and equipment.
(dollars in thousands)
April 27, 2014
April 28, 2013
% Change
Accounts receivable
and inventory
$
36,229
$
33,323
8.7%
Property, plant & equipment
29,040
Goodwill
Non-compete agreement
Customer Relationships
11,462
1,041
817
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
28,578
11,462
185
-
1.6%
0.0%
462.7%
100%
Accounts receivable increased due to the increase in net sales of 6.9% and fewer customers taking
advantage of discounts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Inventory increased due to current and expected demand trends as of the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal
2014 compared with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, as well as the increased sales contribution from
CLASS.
Property, Plant & Equipment
The $29.0 million at April 27, 2014, represented property, plant and equipment of $20.6 million and $8.4
million located in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. The $28.6 million at April 28, 2013, represented
property, plant, and equipment of $20.4 million and $8.2 million located in the U.S. and Canada,
respectively.
37
The change in this segment’s property, plant, and equipment was due to capital spending of $4.4 million
and $890,000 in equipment acquired in the asset purchase transaction with Bodet & Horst, partially offset
by depreciation expense of $4.7 million.
Non-Compete Agreement and Customer Relationships
The increases in carrying values of our non-compete agreement and customer relationships at April 27,
2014, were primarily due to the asset purchase transaction with Bodet & Horst effective May 8, 2013.
Upholstery Fabrics Segment
Net Sales
(dollars in thousands)
April 27, 2014
April 28, 2013
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Non U.S. Produced
U.S Produced
Total
$
$
115,991
92%
$
102,060
10,466
8%
12,740
89%
11%
13.6%
(17.8)%
126,457
100%
$
114,800
100%
10.2%
The increase in net sales reflected our strategic focus on product innovation and creativity. This focus has
allowed us to develop a diverse product mix of fabric styles and price points. Our 100% owned China
platform provided us significant manufacturing flexibility to meet changing customer demand in line with
current furniture style trends.
Although net sales declined for our one remaining U.S. upholstery fabric manufacturing facility, this
operation remained profitable. This continued profitability reflected our ability to manage our production
costs and align them with current and expected demand trends.
Gross Profit and Operating Income
(dollars in thousands)
April 27, 2014
April 28, 2013
% Change
Twelve Months Ended
Gross profit
$
Gross profit margin
SG&A expenses
Income from operations
Operating margin
21,429
16.9%
13,393
8,036
6.4%
$
19,984
17.4%
13,031
6,953
6.1%
7.2%
(2.9)%
2.8%
15.6%
4.9%
Our upholstery fabric segment's operating margin increased primarily due to the increase in net sales
noted above, combined with stable SG&A expenses compared to the prior year. Although our operating
margin increased for fiscal 2014, our gross profit margin was affected by the adverse weather conditions
experienced in the United States during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014.
38
Segment Assets
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventory, and property, plant and equipment.
(dollars in thousands)
April 27, 2014
April 28, 2013
% Change
Accounts receivable
and inventory
$
31,854
$
28,487
11.8%
Property, plant & equipment
1,573
1,230
27.9%
Accounts Receivable & Inventory
Our increase in accounts receivable and inventory reflected this segment's increased business volume in
fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013.
Property, Plant & Equipment
The $1.6 million at April 27, 2014, represented property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S. of
$957,000, located in China of $572,000, and located in Poland of $44,000. The $1.2 million at April 28,
2013, represented property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S. of $908,000, located in China of
$265,000, and located in Poland of $57,000.
The change in this segment’s property, plant, and equipment balance was primarily due to capital
expenditures of $827,000 offset by depreciation expense of $618,000.
Other Income Statement Categories
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses for the company as a whole were $28.7 million for fiscal 2014 compared with $28.4
million for fiscal 2013. SG&A as a percent of net sales was 10.0% and 10.6% in fiscal 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $427,000 for fiscal 2014 compared with $632,000 for fiscal 2013. This trend
reflected lower outstanding balances on our long-term debt in fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013.
Interest Income
Interest income was $482,000 in fiscal 2014 compared with $419,000 for fiscal 2013. This trend
reflected higher cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances held by our foreign
subsidiaries during fiscal 2014 compared with fiscal 2013. Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investment balances held by our foreign subsidiaries had higher interest rates as compared to our funds
held in the United States.
39
Other Expense
Other expense was $1.3 million for fiscal 2014 compared with $583,000 for fiscal 2013. This increase
reflected unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates associated with operations located in China for
fiscal 2014 compared with the same period a year ago. We recorded a foreign currency exchange loss of
$571,000 in fiscal 2014 compared to a foreign currency exchange loss of $158,000 in fiscal 2013
regarding our operations located in China.
Also, a non-recurring charge of $206,000 was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 for the
settlement of litigation relating to the environmental claims associated with a closed facility, and there
was no comparable charge recorded in fiscal 2013.
Income Taxes
We recorded income tax expense of $1.6 million, or 8.4% of income before income tax expense, in fiscal
2014 compared with income tax expense of $2.0 million, or 9.7% of income before income tax expense,
in fiscal 2013. The following schedule summarizes the principal differences between income tax expense
at the federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated financial
statements:
federal income tax rate
foreign tax rate differential
increase in liability for uncertain tax positions
undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries
change in valuation allowance
other
2014
34.0%
(7.2)
4.3
(26.3)
0.1
3.5
8.4%
2013
34.0%
(6.7)
4.0
34.6
(58.3)
2.1
9.7%
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Currently, our sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flow
from operations, and amounts available under our unsecured revolving credit lines. These sources have
been adequate for day-to-day operations, capital expenditures, debt payments, common stock repurchases,
and dividend payments. We believe our present cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balance of $39.7 million at May 3, 2015, cash flow from operations, and current availability under our
unsecured revolving credit lines will be sufficient to fund our business needs and our contractual
obligations (see commitments table below).
At May 3, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $39.7 million and
exceeded our total debt (all of which is classified in current maturities of long-term debt) of $2.2 million.
We currently have one remaining annual $2.2 million principal payment due on our long-term debt in
August 2015.
We currently hold cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments in foreign jurisdictions to
support the operational requirements of our foreign operations located in Canada and China and for U.S.
and foreign income tax planning purposes.
40
A summary of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments by geographic area follows:
(dollars in thousands)
China
Canada
Cayman Islands
United States
Poland
May 3, April 27,
2014
15,258
14,386
-
5,772
181
35,597
2015
14,630
12,511
8,591
3,977
20
39,729
$
$
At the end of fiscal 2015, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments increased to $39.7
million from $35.6 million at April 27, 2014, despite spending in fiscal 2015 of $10.5 million on capital
expenditures, $8.3 million on dividend payments and common stock repurchases, $2.7 million on
payments on our long-term debt and lines of credit, and $1.7 million on long-term investment purchases
associated with our Rabbi Trust that is partially funding our deferred compensation plan.
Our net cash provided by operating activities of $26.1 million increased 29% in fiscal 2015 compared
with $20.2 million for fiscal 2014. This increase is primarily due to the increase in cash flow from
earnings and improved working capital management in both our business segments.
We are currently planning for capital expenditures of approximately $7.5 million to $9.0 million in fiscal
2016, which primarily pertain to our mattress fabrics segment. This amount remains subject to change and
could be adjusted during the year as business conditions and the needs of our businesses continue to evolve.
Our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments may be adversely affected by factors beyond
our control, such as weakening industry demand and delays in receipt of payments on accounts
receivable.
Dividend Program
During fiscal 2015, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $4.9 million represented a special
cash dividend payment in the first quarter of $0.40 per share, and $2.7 million represented our regularly
quarterly cash dividend payments ranging from $0.05 to $0.06 per share.
During fiscal 2014, we paid quarterly dividends totaling $2.2 million that ranged from $0.04 to $0.05 per
share.
On June 18, 2015, we announced that our board of directors approved the payment of special cash
dividend of $0.40 per share and a regular cash dividend payment of $0.06 per share on July 15, 2015, to
shareholders of record as of July 1, 2015.
Future dividend payments are subject to board approval and may be adjusted at the Board’s discretion as
business needs or market conditions change.
Common Stock Repurchases
On February 25, 2014, we announced that our board of directors approved an increase to $5.0 million in
the authorization for us to acquire our common stock. Under the common stock repurchase program,
shares may be purchased from time to time in open market transactions, block trades, through plans
established under the Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, or otherwise. The amount of shares
purchased and the timing of such purchases will be based on working capital requirements, market and
general business conditions, and other factors including alternative investment opportunities.
41
During fiscal 2015, we purchased 43,014 shares of our common stock at a cost of $745,000, all of which
were purchased in the first and second quarters. At May 3, 2015, we had $4.3 million available for
additional repurchases of our common stock.
During fiscal 2014, there were no repurchases of our common stock.
Since June 2011, and including the special and regular dividends paid in July, we have returned
approximately $35 million to shareholders in the form of regular quarterly and special dividends and
share repurchases.
Working Capital
Accounts receivable at May 3, 2015, were $28.7 million, an increase of 5% compared with $27.4 million
at April 27, 2014. This increase is primarily due to an increase in net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2015 compared with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. Net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 and
2014 were $78.8 million and $74.0 million, respectively. Days’ sales in receivables were 33 days and 34
days during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Inventories at May 3, 2015 were $42.5 million, an increase of 5% compared with $40.7 million at April
27, 2014. This increase primarily reflects increased business volume in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015
compared to the same period of fiscal 2014 and expected demand trends in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.
Inventory turns were 6.4 and 6.1 during the fourth quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Accounts payable-trade as of May 3, 2015, was $28.4 million, an increase of 7% compared with
$26.7 million at April 27, 2014. This increase primarily reflects increased inventory purchases, as a result
of the increased business volume in fiscal 2015 compared with fiscal 2014.
Operating working capital (comprised of accounts receivable and inventories, less accounts payable –
trade and capital expenditures) was $41.8 million at May 3, 2015, compared with $41.1 million at
April 27, 2014. Operating working capital turnover was 7.7 in fiscal 2015 compared to 7.0 in fiscal 2014.
Financing Arrangements
Unsecured Term Notes
We entered into a note agreement dated August 11, 2008 that provided for the issuance of $11.0 million
of unsecured term notes with a fixed interest rate of 8.01% and a term of seven years. Principal payments
of $2.2 million per year are due on the notes beginning August 11, 2011. The remaining principal
payments are payable over an average term of 0.3 years through August 11, 2015. Any principal
prepayments would be assessed a penalty as defined in the agreement. The agreement contains customary
financial and other covenants as defined in the agreement.
As of May 3, 2015, we have one remaining annual payment of $2.2 million due on August 1, 2015.
42
Revolving Credit Agreement –United States
As of May 3, 2015, we had an unsecured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo')
that provided for an unsecured revolving loan commitment of $10.0 million to be used to finance working
capital and general corporate purposes. The amount of borrowings that were outstanding under the credit
agreement with Culp Europe at April 27, 2014, noted below decreased the $10.0 million available.
Interest was charged at a rate (applicable interest rate of 1.78% and 1.75% at May 3, 2015 and April 27,
2014, respectively) equal to the one-month LIBOR rate plus a spread based on the ratio of debt to
EBITDA as defined in the agreement. The Credit Agreement contained customary financial and other
covenants as defined in the agreement and was set to expire August 31, 2015.
Our credit agreement with Wells Fargo contained a financial covenant that limited our capital
expenditures to $10 million in any fiscal year. Effective March 3, 2015, Wells Fargo increased our capital
expenditure limit from $10 million to $12 million for fiscal 2015, as a result of the capital expansion plan
associated with our mattress fabrics segment. Our capital expenditures were $10.5 million for fiscal 2015,
and as a result, we are not in violation of this financial covenant.
Effective July 10, 2015, we amended the Credit Agreement to extend the expiration date to August 31,
2017 and maintain the annual capital expenditure limit of $12 million noted above.
At May 3, 2015, and April 27, 2014, there were $250,000 and $195,000 in outstanding letters of credit
(all of which related to workers compensation) provided by the Credit Agreement. There were no
borrowings outstanding under the agreement associated with our U.S. operations at May 3, 2015, and
April 27, 2014.
Revolving Credit Agreement - China
We have an unsecured credit agreement associated with our operations in China that provides for a line of
credit up to 40 million RMB (approximately $6.4 million USD at May 3, 2015), expiring on February 9,
2016. This agreement has an interest rate determined by the Chinese government. There were no
borrowings under this agreement as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014.
Revolving Credit Agreement – Culp Europe
At April 27, 2014, we had an unsecured credit agreement with Wells Fargo that incurred interest at
WIBOR (Warsaw Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2% (applicable interest rate of 4.38% at April 27, 2014).
There were $586,000 (1.8 million Polish Zloty) in borrowings outstanding under the agreement at
April 27, 2014.
Effective May 2, 2014, we converted our 1.8 million Polish Zloty ($586,000 USD) denominated
borrowings under this agreement to EURO denominated borrowings totaling €424,000 ($588,000 USD).
In addition, our applicable interest rate was converted to EURO LIBOR plus 2%.
At May 3, 2015, no borrowings were outstanding this agreement, as the outstanding balance was paid in
full during the second quarter of fiscal 2015.
Overall
Our loan agreements require, among other things, that we maintain compliance with certain financial
covenants. At May 3, 2015, the company was in compliance with these financial covenants.
43
Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual payment obligations and commitments for each of the
next five fiscal years (in thousands):
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
Capital expenditures
Accounts payable –
capital expenditures
Operating leases
Interest expense
Line of credit
Long-term debt –
principal
Total (1)
$ 2,270
-
990
2,553
86
-
2,200
$ 8,099
-
1,458
-
-
-
1,458
-
-
645
-
-
-
645
-
-
76
-
-
-
76
-
-
23
-
-
-
23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,270
990
4,755
86
-
2,200
10,301
Note: Payment Obligations by End of Each Fiscal Year
(1) At May 3, 2015, we had $14.1 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $10.3
million and $3.8 million were classified as net non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes
payable – long-term, respectively. The final outcome of these tax uncertainties is dependent upon
various matters including tax examinations, legal proceedings, competent authority proceedings,
changes in regulatory tax laws, or interpretations of those tax laws, or expiration of statutes of
limitation. As a result of these inherent uncertainties, the company cannot reasonably estimate the
timing of payment of these amounts. Of the $14.1 million in total gross unrecognized tax benefits,
$10.3 million would not be subject to cash payments due to the company’s U.S. federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures on a cash basis were $10.5 million and $5.3 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014,
respectively. These capital expenditures primarily pertained to our mattress fabrics segment. Depreciation
expense was $5.8 million and $5.3 million for fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively, and primarily pertained
to our mattress fabrics segment.
For fiscal 2016, we are projecting capital expenditures for the company as a whole to be $7.5 million to
$9.0 million. Depreciation expense for the company as a whole is projected to be $7.0 million in fiscal
2016. The estimated capital expenditures and depreciation expense primarily relate to the mattress fabrics
segment. These are management’s current expectations only, and changes in our business needs could
cause changes in plans for capital expenditures and expectations for related depreciation expense.
Accounts Payable – Capital Expenditures
At May 3, 2015, we had total amounts due regarding capital expenditures totaling $990,000, which
pertain to outstanding vendor invoices, none of which are financed. This amount due of $990,000 is
required to be paid in full during fiscal 2016.
44
Handling Costs
We record warehousing costs in SG&A expenses. These costs were $3.8 million, $3.5 million, and $3.2
million, in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively. Warehousing costs include the operating expenses of
our various finished goods distribution centers, such as personnel costs, utilities, building rent and
material handling equipment, and lease expense. Had these costs been included in cost of sales, gross
profit would have been $51.8 million or 16.7% of net sales, in fiscal 2015, $45.4 million or 15.8% of net
sales, in fiscal 2014, and $46.3 million, or 17.2% of net sales, in fiscal 2013.
Inflation
Any significant increase in our raw material costs, utility/energy costs and general economic inflation
could have a material adverse impact on the company, because competitive conditions have limited our
ability to pass significant operating increases on to customers.
Critical Accounting Policies
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
our reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of these
estimates require difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently
uncertain, and as a result actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Due to the
estimation processes involved, management considers the following summarized accounting policies and
their application to be critical to understanding the company’s business operations, financial condition
and results of operations.
Accounts Receivable - Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Substantially all of our accounts receivable are
due from residential furniture and bedding manufacturers. As of May 3, 2015, accounts receivable from
furniture manufacturers totaled approximately $11.9 million, and accounts receivable from bedding
manufacturers totaled approximately $16.8 million. Additionally, as of May 3, 2015, the aggregate
accounts receivable balance of our ten largest customers was $15.0 million, or 52% of trade accounts
receivable. No customers within the upholstery fabrics segment accounted for 10% or more of
consolidated accounts receivable as of May 3, 2015. One customer within the mattress fabrics segment
represented 10% of consolidated accounts receivable at May 3, 2015.
We continuously perform credit evaluations of our customers, considering numerous inputs including
customers’ financial position, past payment history, cash flows and management capability; historical loss
experience; and economic conditions and prospects. Once evaluated, each customer is assigned a credit
grade. Credit grades are adjusted as warranted. Significant management judgment and estimates must be
used in connection with establishing the reserve for allowance for doubtful accounts. While management
believes that adequate allowances for doubtful accounts have been provided in the consolidated financial
statements, it is possible that we could experience additional unexpected credit losses.
The reserve balance for doubtful accounts was $851,000 and $573,000 at May 3, 2015, and April 27,
2014, respectively.
Inventory Valuation. We operate as a “make-to-order” and “make-to-stock” business. Although
management closely monitors demand in each product area to decide which patterns and styles to hold in
inventory, the increasing availability of low cost imports and the gradual shifts in consumer preferences
expose the company to markdowns of inventory.
45
Management continually examines inventory to determine if there are indicators that the carrying value
exceeds its net realizable value. Experience has shown that the most significant indicator of the need for
inventory markdowns is the age of the inventory and the planned discontinuance of certain patterns. As a
result, the company provides inventory valuation markdowns based upon set percentages for inventory
aging categories, generally using six, nine, twelve and fifteen month categories. We also provide
inventory valuation write-downs based on the planned discontinuance of certain products based on the
current market values at that time as compared to their current carrying values. While management
believes that adequate markdowns for excess and obsolete inventory have been made in the consolidated
financial statements, significant unanticipated changes in demand or changes in consumer tastes and
preferences could result in additional excess and obsolete inventory in the future.
The reserve for inventory markdowns was $2.6 million and $2.2 million at May 3, 2015, and April 27,
2014, respectively.
Goodwill. Management assesses goodwill for impairment at the end of each fiscal year or between
annual tests if an event that occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying values. In accordance with ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles
– Goodwill and Other, we performed our annual impairment test on a qualitative basis. Based on our
qualitative assessment, we determined that our goodwill is not impaired using a more likely than not
standard.
The company’s goodwill of $11.5 million at May 3, 2015, relates to the mattress fabrics segment.
Although we believe we have based the impairment testing on reasonable estimates and assumptions, the
use of different estimates and assumptions could result in materially different results.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income
taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the
tax bases of the company’s assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards at income
tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred income
taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income (loss) in the period that includes the enactment date.
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation
allowance is required. ASC Topic 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance
should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not”
standard with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Since the
company operates in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on a jurisdiction-
by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law. Based on this assessment, we
recorded a partial valuation allowance of $922,000 and $977,000 million against our net deferred tax
assets at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively. Our valuation allowance of $922,000 at May 3,
2015, represents a $561,000 valuation allowance against certain U.S. state net operating loss
carryforwards and credits and a valuation allowance of $361,000 against our loss carryforwards
associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland. Our valuation allowance of $977,000 at
April 27, 2014, represents a $666,000 valuation allowance against certain U.S. state net operating loss
carryforwards and credits and a valuation allowance of $311,000 against our loss carryforwards
associated with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland.
Refer to Note 9 located in the notes to the consolidated statements for disclosures regarding our assessment of
our recorded valuation allowance as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively.
46
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we assess whether the undistributed earnings from our foreign
subsidiaries will be reinvested indefinitely or eventually distributed to our U.S. parent company. ASC Topic
740 requires that a deferred tax liability should be recorded for undistributed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries that will not be reinvested indefinitely. Also, we assess the recognition of U.S. foreign income
tax credits associated with foreign withholding and income tax payments and whether it is more-likely-than-
not that our foreign income tax credits will not be realized. If it is determined that any foreign income tax
credits need to be recognized or it is more-likely-than-not our foreign income tax credits will not be realized,
an adjustment to our provision for income taxes will be recognized at that time.
At May 3, 2015, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $85.2
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $1.7 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes totaling
$32.4 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $30.7 million.
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we must recognize the tax impact from an uncertain tax position only
if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities,
based on the technical merits of the position. The tax impact recognized in the financial statements from
such a position is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate resolution. Penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions are recorded as
income tax expense. Significant judgment is required in the identification of uncertain tax positions and in
the estimation of penalties and interest on uncertain tax positions.
At May 3, 2015, we had $14.1 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $10.3 million
and $3.8 million were classified as net non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable –
long-term, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Stock-Based Compensation. ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, requires that all
stock-based compensation be recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements and that
such cost be measured at the grant date for awards issued to employees and our board of directors. Equity
awards issued to non-employees are measured at the earlier date of when the performance criteria are met
or at the end of each reporting period.
Compensation expense for unvested incentive stock options and time vested stock awards are amortized
on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting periods. At May 3, 2015, there were no unvested
incentive stock options or time vested restricted stock awards. Therefore, there was no unrecognized
compensation cost related to these types of equity based awards at May 3, 2015. Our common stock
awards issued to our board of directors vest immediately, and therefore, compensation cost was measured
at the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant and recognized in full at that time.
Compensation expense for performance based restricted stock units are recorded based on an assessment
each reporting period of the probability if certain performance goals will be met during the contingent
vesting period. If performance goals are not probable of occurrence, no compensation expense will be
recognized. Performance goals that were previously deemed probable and were not or expected to be met,
previously recognized compensation cost will be reversed. At May 3, 2015, the remaining compensation
cost related to the performance based restricted stock units was $1.2 million.
We recorded $786,000, $710,000, and $562,000 of compensation expense within selling, general, and
administrative expense for our equity based awards in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
47
Excess income tax benefits related to our equity incentive plans are reflected as financing cash inflows on
the Statement of Cash Flows. We have elected to record the additional excess tax benefits associated with
our equity incentive awards as a reduction in current income tax payable prior to utilizing any net
operating loss carryforward.
Our equity incentive plans are described more fully in Note 12 in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 located in the notes to the consolidated statements for recently adopted accounting
pronouncements for fiscal 2015.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 1 located in the notes to the consolidated statements for recently issued accounting
pronouncements for fiscal 2016 and beyond.
48
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our revolving credit lines.
At May 3, 2015, our U.S. revolving credit agreement had an interest rate equal to the one-month LIBOR
rate plus a spread based on our ratio of debt to EBITDA as defined in the agreement. Our revolving credit
line associated with our China subsidiaries bears interest at a rate determined by the Chinese government.
Our revolving credit line associated with our operation located in Poland bears interest at the EURO
LIBOR plus 2%. At May 3, 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding under any of our revolving credit
lines.
We are not exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our long-term debt. Our unsecured
term notes have a fixed interest rate of 8.01%.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in the value of foreign currencies for our subsidiaries
domiciled in China, Canada, and Poland. We try to maintain a natural hedge by keeping a balance of our
assets and liabilities denominated in the local currency of our subsidiaries domiciled in Canada and
Poland, although there is no assurance that we will be able to continually maintain this natural hedge. Our
foreign subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. A substantial portion of the
company’s imports purchased outside the U.S. are denominated in U.S. dollars. A 10% change in the
above exchange rates at May 3, 2015, would not have had a significant impact on our results of operations
or financial position.
49
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Culp, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Culp, Inc. (a North Carolina
Corporation) and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, and the
related consolidated statements of net income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 3, 2015. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Culp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 3, 2015 and
April 27, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended May 3, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
May 3, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated July 17, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
July 17, 2015
50
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data and preferred and common stock shares)
May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014
ASSETS
current assets:
cash and cash equivalents
short-term investments
accounts receivable, net
inventories
deferred income taxes
income taxes receivable
other current assets
total current assets
property, plant and equipment, net
goodwill
deferred income taxes
long-term investments
other assets
total assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
current liabilities:
current maturities of long-term debt
accounts payable - trade
accounts payable - capital expenditures
accrued expenses
income taxes payable
total current liabilities
income taxes payable - long-term
deferred income taxes
line of credit
deferred compensation
long-term debt, less current maturities
total liabilities
commitments and contingencies (notes 10 and 11)
shareholders' equity:
preferred stock, $.05 par value, authorized 10,000,000
shares
common stock, $.05 par value, authorized 40,000,000
shares, issued and outstanding 12,219,121 at
May 3, 2015 and 12,250,030 at April 27, 2014
capital contributed in excess of par value
accumulated earnings
accumulated other comprehensive loss
total shareholders' equity
total liabilities and shareholders' equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
2015
2014
$
$
$
29,725
10,004
28,749
42,484
4,790
229
2,440
118,421
36,078
11,462
447
2,415
2,545
171,368
2,200
28,414
990
11,129
325
43,058
3,792
1,050
-
4,041
-
51,941
$
$
$
29,303
6,294
27,409
40,674
6,230
121
2,344
112,375
31,376
11,462
2,040
765
2,917
160,935
2,200
26,686
277
9,181
442
38,786
3,962
1,013
586
2,644
2,200
49,191
-
-
611
43,159
75,752
(95)
119,427
171,368
612
42,932
68,260
(60)
111,744
160,935
$
$
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
For the years ended May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2015
2014
2013
net sales
cost of sales
gross profit
selling, general and administrative expenses
income from operations
interest expense
interest income
other expense, net
income before income taxes
income tax expense (note 9)
net income
net income per share-basic
net income per share-diluted
$
$
$
$
310,166
254,599
55,567
32,778
22,789
64
(622)
391
22,956
7,885
15,071
$1.23
$1.21
$
$
287,162
238,256
48,906
28,657
20,249
427
(482)
1,261
19,043
1,596
17,447
$1.43
$1.41
268,814
219,284
49,530
28,445
21,085
632
(419)
583
20,289
1,972
18,317
$1.50
$1.47
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the years ended May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013
Net income
$
15,071
$
17,447
$
18,317
2015
2014
2013
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments, net of taxes
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(35)
(35)
(114)
(114)
38
38
Comprehensive income
$
15,036
$
17,333
$
18,355
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
53
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands, except common stock shares)
For the years ended May 3, 2015,
April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013
balance, April 29, 2012
net income
stock-based compensation
unrealized gain on investments
excess tax benefit related to stock options
exercised
common stock repurchased
fully vested common stock award
common stock issued in connection
with exercise of stock options
dividends paid
balance, April 28, 2013
net income
stock-based compensation
unrealized loss on investments
excess tax benefit related to stock options
exercised
fully vested common stock award
common stock issued in connection
with exercise of stock options
common stock issued surrendered for
withholding taxes payable
dividends paid
balance, April 27, 2014
net income
stock-based compensation
unrealized loss on investments
excess tax benefit related to stock options
exercised
common stock repurchased
fully vested common stock award
common stock issued in connection
with exercise of stock options
common stock issued surrendered for
withholding taxes payable
dividends paid
common
stock
shares
common
stock
amount
capital
contributed
in excess of
par value
Accumulated
earnings
accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
total
shareholders'
equity
$
$
46,056
-
562
-
$
42,293
18,317
-
-
$
12,702,806
-
-
-
-
(502,595)
1,658
23,025
-
12,224,894
-
-
-
-
3,000
23,125
(989)
-
12,250,030
-
-
-
-
(43,014)
3,000
10,100
(995)
635
-
-
-
-
(25)
-
1
-
611
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
612
-
-
-
-
(2)
-
1
-
76
(4,997)
-
204
-
41,901
-
710
-
143
-
193
(15)
-
42,932
-
786
-
109
(743)
-
93
(18)
$
16
-
-
38
-
-
-
-
-
54
-
-
(114)
-
-
-
-
-
(60)
-
-
(35)
-
-
-
-
-
(95)
$
89,000
18,317
562
38
76
(5,022)
-
205
(7,593)
95,583
17,447
710
(114)
143
-
194
(15)
(2,204)
111,744
15,071
786
(35)
109
(745)
-
94
(18)
(7,579)
119,427
-
-
-
-
(7,593)
53,017
17,447
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,204)
68,260
15,071
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(7,579)
75,752
$
balance, May 3, 2015
12,219,121
$
611
$
43,159
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
54
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended May 3, 2015, April 27,2014, and April 28, 2013
(dollars in thousands)
2015
2014
2013
cash flows from operating activities:
net income
adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
depreciation
amortization of other assets
stock-based compensation
excess tax benefit related to stock options exercised
deferred income taxes
gain on sale of equipment
foreign currency exchange (gains) losses
changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition of assets:
accounts receivable
inventories
other current assets
other assets
accounts payable-trade
accrued expenses and deferred compensation
income taxes
net cash provided by operating activities
cash flows from investing activities:
capital expenditures
net cash paid for acquisition of assets
purchase of short-term investments
proceeds from the sale of short-term investments
purchase of long-term investments
proceeds from life insurance policies
payments on life insurance policies
proceeds from the sale of buildings and equipment
net cash used in investing activities
cash flows from financing activities:
proceeds from lines of credit
payments on lines of credit
payments on long-term debt
debt issuance costs
repurchases of common stock
dividends paid
proceeds from common stock issued
excess tax benefit related to stock options exercised
net cash used in financing activities
effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
15,071
$
17,447
$
18,317
5,773
187
786
(109)
3,179
(78)
(84)
(1,636)
(1,883)
(151)
(117)
1,964
3,372
(163)
26,111
(10,461)
-
(5,355)
1,628
(1,650)
320
(18)
727
(14,809)
-
(538)
(2,200)
-
(745)
(7,579)
94
109
(10,859)
(21)
422
5,312
169
710
(143)
(1,727)
(283)
626
(3,857)
(2,200)
(270)
(72)
4,131
34
342
20,219
(5,258)
(2,640)
(1,945)
810
(765)
-
(30)
407
(9,421)
-
-
(2,200)
(83)
-
(2,204)
194
143
(4,150)
(875)
5,773
5,115
235
562
(76)
(344)
-
222
1,667
(1,979)
(49)
(176)
(8,384)
2,491
(526)
17,075
(4,400)
-
(105)
795
-
716
(19)
-
(3,013)
1,000
(1,325)
(2,515)
-
(5,022)
(7,593)
205
76
(15,174)
(381)
(1,493)
cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
29,303
23,530
25,023
cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
29,725
$
29,303
$
23,530
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business – Our operations are classified into two business segments: mattress fabrics and
upholstery fabrics. The mattress fabrics segment manufacturers, sources, and sells fabrics and mattress
covers to bedding manufacturers. The upholstery fabrics segment sources, manufacturers, and sells
fabrics primarily to residential furniture manufacturers. The majority of our revenues are derived in North
America. The company has mattress fabric operations located in Stokesdale, NC, High Point, NC, and
Quebec, Canada. The company has upholstery fabric operations located in Shanghai, China, Burlington,
NC and Anderson, SC.
At the end of our third quarter of fiscal 2015, we closed our finished goods warehouse and distribution
facility located in Poznan, Poland, primarily as a result of the ongoing economic concerns in Europe.
Currently, we remain interested in developing business in Europe, and we are assessing the best strategy
for selling upholstery fabric into this market as business conditions improve.
Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements of the company have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company
and its subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounts of our subsidiaries located in Shanghai, China and
Poznan, Poland are consolidated as of April 30, a calendar month end, which is required by the Chinese
and Polish governments, respectively. No events occurred related to the difference between our fiscal year
end on the Sunday closest to April 30 and our China and Polish subsidiaries year end of April 30 that
materially affected the company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for fiscal years
2015, 2014, and 2013.
Fiscal Year – Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Sunday closest to April 30.
Fiscal 2015 included 53 weeks. Fiscal 2014 and 2013 each included 52 weeks.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposit and money market
accounts. We consider all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
A summary of our cash and cash equivalents by geographic area follows:
(dollars in thousands)
China
Cayman Islands
Canada
United States
Poland
May 3, April 27,
2014
15,258
-
9,139
4,725
181
29,303
2015
13,018
8,591
5,178
2,918
20
29,725
$
$
56
Throughout the year, we have cash balances regarding our U.S. operations in excess of federally insured
amounts on deposit with a financial institution. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Management believes we are not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash and cash
equivalents.
Short-Term Investments – Our short-term investments consist of bond funds that are classified as
available-for-sale and a deposit account with a maturity in excess of more than three months. Our short
term investments had an accumulated unrealized loss totaling $95,000 and $60,000 at May 3, 2015 and
April 27, 2014, respectively. Our short-term investments were recorded at its fair value of $10.0 million
and $6.3 million at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively. The fair value of our short-term
investments approximates its cost basis.
A summary of our short-term investments by geographic area follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Canada
China
United States
Cayman Islands
Poland
May 3, April 27,
2014
5,247
-
1,047
-
-
6,294
2015
7,333
1,612
1,059
-
-
10,004
$
$
Long-Term Investments – Effective January 1, 2014, we established a Rabbi Trust to set aside funds for
participants of our deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) and enable the participants to credit their
contributions to various investment options of the Plan. The investments associated with the Rabbi Trust
consist of investments in a money market fund and various mutual funds that are classified as available
for sale.
Our long-term investments were recorded at its fair value of $2.4 million and $765,000 at May 3, 2015
and April 27, 2014, respectively. The fair value of long-term investments approximates its cost basis.
Accounts Receivable – Substantially all of our accounts receivable are due from manufacturers in the
bedding and furniture industries. We grant credit to customers, a substantial number of which are located
in North America and generally do not require collateral. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts
that reflects estimates of probable credit losses. Management continuously performs credit evaluations of
our customers, considering numerous inputs including financial position, past payment history, cash
flows, management ability, historical loss experience and economic conditions and prospects. We do not
have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers.
Inventories – We account for inventories at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market.
Management continually examines inventory to determine if there are indicators that the carrying value
exceeds its net realizable value. Experience has shown that the most significant indicators of the need for
inventory markdowns are the age of the inventory and the planned discontinuance of certain patterns. As
a result, we provide inventory valuation write-downs based upon established percentages based on the age
of the inventory that are continually evaluated as events and market conditions require. Our inventory
aging categories are six, nine, twelve, and fifteen months. We also provide inventory valuation write-
downs based on the planned discontinuance of certain products based on the current market values at that
time as compared to their current carrying values.
Property, Plant and Equipment – Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated
over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Major renewals and betterments are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. When properties or
equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are
57
removed from the accounts. Amounts received on disposal less the book value of assets sold are charged
or credited to income from operations.
Management reviews long-lived assets, which consist principally of property, plant and equipment, for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may
not be recovered. Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of
the carrying amount of the asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, the related cost and
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and an impairment charge is recognized for the
excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. After the impairment loss is recognized, the
adjusted carrying amount is the new accounting basis. Assets to be disposed of by sale are reported at the
lower of the carrying value or fair value less cost to sell when the company has committed to a disposal
plan, and are reported separately as assets held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets.
Interest costs of $171,000 were capitalized for the construction of qualifying fixed assets for fiscal 2015.
No interest costs were capitalized for the construction of qualifying fixed assets for fiscal years 2014 and
2013.
Foreign Currency Adjustments – The United States dollar is the functional currency for the company’s
Canadian, Chinese, and Polish subsidiaries. All monetary foreign currency asset and liability accounts are
remeasured into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Non-monetary asset and liabilities such as
property, plant, and equipment are recorded at historical exchange rates. Foreign currency revenues and
expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during the year, except for certain expenses
related to balance sheet amounts remeasured at historical exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses from
remeasurement of foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are recorded in the other
expense, net line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income in the period in which they occur.
A summary of our foreign currency exchange gains (losses) by geographic area follows:
(dollars in thousands) 2015
241
China
(108)
Canada
(2)
Poland
131
$
$
2014
(571)
(44)
(50)
(665)
2013
(158)
(10)
(40)
(208)
Goodwill – Management assesses goodwill for impairment at the end of each fiscal year or between
annual tests if an event that occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying values. In accordance with ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-
Goodwill and Other (ASC Topic 350), we performed our annual impairment test on a qualitative basis.
Based on our qualitative assessments as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, we determined that our
goodwill was not impaired using a more likely than not standard.
Our goodwill of $11.5 million at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively, relates to our mattress
fabrics segment.
Income Taxes – Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income
taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the
tax bases of our assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards at income tax rates
expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred income taxes of
a change in tax rates is recognized in income (loss) in the period that includes the enactment date.
We evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation allowance is required. We assess
whether a valuation allowance should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence
using a “more likely than not” standard with significant weight being given to evidence that can be
58
objectively verified. Since we operate in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation
allowance on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law.
We assess whether the undistributed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries will be reinvested indefinitely or
eventually distributed to our U.S. parent company. We are required to record a deferred tax liability for
undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries that will not be reinvested indefinitely. Also, we assess the
recognition of U.S. foreign income tax credits associated with foreign withholding and income tax payments
and whether it is more-likely-than-not that our foreign income tax credits will not be realized. If it is
determined that any foreign income tax credits need to be recognized or it is more-likely-than-not our foreign
income tax credits will not be realized, an adjustment to our provision for income taxes will be recognized at
that time.
We recognize the tax impact from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax impact recognized in the financial statements from such a position is measured based on
the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.
Penalties and interest related to uncertain tax positions are recorded as income tax expense. Significant
judgment is required in the identification of uncertain tax positions and in the estimation of penalties and
interest on uncertain tax positions.
Revenue Recognition – Revenue is primarily recognized upon shipment and when title and risk of loss
pass to the customer. Provision is currently made for estimated product returns, claims and allowances.
Management considers historical claims and return experience, among other things, when establishing the
allowance for returns and allowances.
Shipping and Handling Costs – Revenue received for shipping and handling costs, which is immaterial
for all periods presented, is included in net sales. Shipping costs, principally freight, that comprise
payments to third-party shippers are classified as cost of sales. Handling costs represent finished goods
warehousing costs incurred to store, move, and prepare products for shipment in the company’s various
distribution facilities. Handling costs were $3.8 million, $3.5 million and $3.2 million in fiscal 2015,
2014, and 2013, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Sales and Other Taxes – Sales and other taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental
authorities are presented on a net basis and, as such, are excluded from revenues.
Stock-Based Compensation – Our equity incentive plans are described more fully in Note 12. ASC 718,
“Compensation – Stock Compensation”, requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as
compensation expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the grant date for
awards issued to employees and the company’s board of directors. Equity awards issued to non-
employees are measured at the earlier date of when the performance criteria are met or at the end of each
reporting period. Compensation expense for unvested stock options and time vested restricted stock
awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting periods. Compensation expense
for performance based restricted stock units were recorded based on an assessment each reporting period
of the probability if certain performance goals were to be met during the contingent vesting period. If
performance goals were not probable of occurrence, no compensation expense was recognized.
Performance goals that were previously deemed probable and were not or expected to be met, previously
recognized compensation cost was reversed. Excess tax benefits related to our equity incentive plans are
reflected as financing cash inflows on the Statements of Cash Flows. We have elected to record the
additional excess tax benefits associated with our equity incentive awards as a reduction in current
income tax payable prior to utilizing any net operating loss carryforwards.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include
certain financial instruments, and the fair market value of such instruments may differ from amounts
reflected on a historical basis. These financial instruments include our long-term debt and short-term and
59
long-term investments. The fair value measurements of our financial instruments are described more fully
in Note 13.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, other
current assets, line of credit, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximates fair value because of
the short maturity of these financial instruments.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
None
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its authoritative guidance on
accounting for certain share-based payment awards. The amended guidance requires that share-based
compensation awards with terms of a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved
after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target
should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award and compensation cost should
be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved.
The guidance will be effective in our fiscal 2017 first quarter. The guidance will permit an entity to apply
the amendments in the update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective
date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning
of the earliest annual period presented in the consolidated financial statements and to all new or modified
awards thereafter. Currently, we do not have any share-based payment awards with terms of a
performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period. We will
apply this new guidance when it becomes effective, and we will evaluate the impact of adoption on our
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance on revenue recognition. The amended guidance will
enhance the comparability of revenue recognition practices and will be applied to all contracts with
customers. Improved disclosures related to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is
recognized are requirements under the amended guidance. This guidance will be effective in our fiscal
2018 first quarter which will be required to be applied retrospectively. We are currently assessing the
impact that this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements at this time.
There are no other new accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS – MATTRESS FABRIC SEGMENT
On May 8, 2013, we entered into an asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst GMBH
& Co. KG and certain affiliates (“Bodet & Horst”) that provided for, among other things, the purchase of
equipment and certain other assets from Bodet & Horst and the restructuring of prior consulting and non-
compete agreements pursuant to an earlier asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst
dated August 11, 2008. This agreement was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with
ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. We agreed with Bodet & Horst to replace the prior non-compete
agreement that prevented us from selling certain mattress fabrics and products to a leading manufacturer,
which now allows us to make such sales. In addition, the prior consulting and non-compete agreement,
under which Bodet & Horst agreed not to sell most mattress fabrics in North America, was replaced,
expanded, and extended pursuant to the new asset purchase and consulting agreement.
The purchase price for the equipment and the certain other assets noted below was $2.6 million in cash.
Direct acquisition costs related to this business combination totaled $83,000.
60
The following table presents the allocation of the acquisition cost to the assets acquired based on their fair
values:
(dollars in thousands)
Equipment (Note 13)
Non-compete agreement (Notes 7 and 13)
Customer relationships (Notes 7 and 13)
$
Fair Value
890
882
868
2,640
$
The company recorded its non-compete at its fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation model.
The company recorded its customer relationships at its fair value based on a multi-period excess earnings
valuation model. This non-compete agreement is being amortized on a straight line basis over the fifteen
year life of the agreement. The customer relationships are being amortized on a straight line basis over
their useful life of seventeen years. The equipment are being amortized on a straight line basis over its
useful life of seven years.
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
A summary of accounts receivable follows:
(dollars in thousands)
customers
allowance for doubtful accounts
reserve for returns and allowances and discounts
May 3, April 27,
2014
28,461
(573)
(479)
27,409
2015
30,338
(851)
(738)
28,749
$
$
A summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts follows:
(dollars in thousands) 2015
(573)
beginning balance
(421)
provision for bad debts
143
write-offs, net of recoveries
(851)
ending balance
$
$
2014
(780)
139
68
(573)
2013
(567)
(283)
70
(780)
A summary of the activity in the allowance for returns and allowances and discounts
follows:
(dollars in thousands) 2015
beginning balance
(479)
provision for returns and allowances
(2,733)
and discounts
credits issued
ending balance
2,474
(738)
$
$
2014
(543)
(2,094)
2,158
(479)
2013
(478)
(2,454)
2,389
(543)
4.
INVENTORIES
A summary of inventories follows:
(dollars in thousands)
raw materials
work-in-process
finished goods
May 3, April 27,
2014
6,707
2,263
31,704
40,674
2015
5,374
2,766
34,344
42,484
$
$
61
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of property, plant and equipment follows:
(dollars in thousands)
land and improvements
buildings and improvements
leasehold improvements
machinery and equipment
office furniture and equipment
capital projects in progress
depreciable lives
(in years)
0-10
7-40
**
3-12
3-10
accumulated depreciation and amortization
May 3,
2015
741
15,312
1,320
57,286
7,340
1,966
83,965
(47,887)
36,078
$
$
April 27,
2014
741
12,983
1,281
51,605
6,865
3,941
77,416
(46,040)
31,376
** Shorter of life of lease or useful life.
At May 3, 2015, we had total amounts due regarding capital expenditures totaling $990,000, which
pertain to outstanding vendor invoices, none of which are financed. The total outstanding amount of
$990,000 is required to be paid in full in fiscal 2016.
At April 27, 2014, we had total amounts due regarding capital expenditures totaling $277,000, which
pertained to outstanding vendor invoices, none of which are financed.
We did not finance any of our capital expenditures in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013.
6. GOODWILL
A summary of the change in the carrying amount of goodwill follows:
(dollars in thousands)
beginning balance
loss on impairment
acquisitions
ending balance
2015
$ 11,462
-
-
$ 11,462
2014
11,462
-
-
11,462
2013
11,462
-
-
11,462
The goodwill balance relates to the mattress fabrics segment.
7. OTHER ASSETS
A summary of other assets follows:
(dollars in thousands)
cash surrender value – life insurance
non-compete agreement, net
customer relationships, net
other
Non-Compete Agreement
May 3,
2015
339
979
766
461
2,545
$
$
April 27,
2014
644
1,041
817
415
2,917
In connection with the asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst on May 8, 2013 (see
note 2), we restructured our prior non-compete agreement pursuant to our asset purchase and consulting
agreement dated August 11, 2008. We have agreed with Bodet & Horst to replace the prior non-compete
62
agreement that prevented us from selling certain mattress fabrics and products to a leading manufacturer,
that will now allow us to make such sales. In addition, the prior consulting and non-compete agreement,
under which Bodet & Horst agreed not to sell mattress fabrics in North America, was replaced, expanded,
and extended pursuant to the new asset purchase and consulting agreement. We recorded this non-
compete agreement at its fair value based on a discounted cash flow valuation model. This non-compete
agreement is amortized on a straight line basis over the fifteen year life of the agreement.
During fiscal 2013, the prior non-compete agreement associated with Bodet & Horst was amortized on a
straight-line basis over the six year life of the previous agreement.
The gross carrying amount of this non-compete agreement was $2.0 million at May 3, 2015 and April 27,
2014, respectively. At May 3, 2015, and April 27, 2014, accumulated amortization for this non-compete
agreement was $1.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Of the $979,000 million non-compete carrying amount at May 3, 2015, $215,000 pertains to the prior
non-compete agreement that was in place as part of the asset purchase agreement dated August 11, 2008,
and $764,000 pertains to the non-compete agreement pursuant to the asset purchase agreement dated May
8, 2013 that restructured and expanded the non-compete agreement that was in place effective August 11,
2008.
Amortization expense for this non-compete agreement was $75,000, $75,000, and $198,000 in fiscal
years 2015, fiscal 2014, and fiscal 2013, respectively. The remaining amortization expense for the next
five years and thereafter follows: FY 2016 - $75,000; FY 2017 - $75,000; FY 2018 - $75,000; FY 2019 -
$75,000; FY 2020 - $75,000, and Thereafter - $604,000.
The weighted average amortization period for the non-compete agreement is 13 years as of May 3, 2015.
Customer Relationships
In connection with the asset purchase and consulting agreement with Bodet & Horst noted above, we
purchased certain customer relationships. We recorded the customer relationships at their fair value based
on a multi-period excess earnings valuation model. The gross carrying amount of these customer
relationships was $868,000 at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively. Accumulated amortization
for these customer relationships was $102,000 and $51,000 at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014,
respectively.
The customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over their seventeen year useful life.
Amortization expense for the customer relationships was $51,000 for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014. The
remaining amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and thereafter follows: FY 2016 - $51,000;
FY 2017 - $51,000; FY 2018 - $51,000; FY 2019 - $51,000; FY 2020 - $51,000; and Thereafter -
$511,000.
The weighted average amortization period for our customer relationships is 15 years as of May 3, 2015.
Cash Surrender Value - Life Insurance
Fiscal 2015
On May 16, 2014, we entered into an agreement with a former employee and his irrevocable trust (the “Trust”)
dated September 7, 1995. As a result of this agreement, a previous split dollar life insurance agreement in
which we purchased a policy on the life of this former employee and his spouse, in which we retained
ownership of the policy, paid premiums to support the policy, had the right to receive cash surrender value of
the policy upon the second to die of the former employee and his spouse, with the Trust receiving the
remainder of the policy’s death benefit ($2.5 million), was terminated. In connection with the termination of
the previous split dollar life insurance agreement, we transferred the life insurance policy to the Trust and
received cash proceeds in the amount of the cash surrender value policy totaling $320,000 during the second
quarter of fiscal 2015.
63
Fiscal 2013
On December 27, 2012, we entered into an agreement with our Chairman of the Board and his irrevocable
trust (the "Trust") dated December 11, 2012. As a result of this agreement, a previous split dollar life
insurance agreement in which we purchased a policy on the life of our Chairman of the Board and his
spouse, in which we retained ownership of the policy, paid premiums to support the policy, had the right
to receive the cash surrender value of the policy upon the second to die of our Chairman of the Board and
his spouse, with the Trust receiving the remainder of the policy's death benefit ($8.0 million), was
terminated. In connection with the termination of the previous split dollar life insurance agreement, we
transferred the life insurance policy to the Trust and received cash proceeds in the amount of the cash
surrender value of the policy totaling $626,000.
Also, this agreement required us to pay our Chairman of the Board during the period of his continued
employment but in any event no longer than twelve years, additional compensation totaling $60,000
annually.
On March 18th, 2013, we entered into another agreement with our Chairman of the Board and the trustees
of the irrevocable trust (the "Trustees"). As a result of this agreement, a previous split dollar life insurance
agreement in which we purchased a policy on the life of the Chairman of the Board, in which we retained
ownership of the policy, paid premiums to support the policy, had the right to receive the cash surrender
value of the policy upon death of the Chairman of the Board, with the Trustees receiving the policy's
death benefit ($500,000) was terminated. In connection with the termination of the previous split dollar
life insurance agreement, we transferred the life insurance policy to the Trustees and received cash
proceeds in the amount of the cash surrender value of the policy totaling $90,000.
Overall
At May 3, 2015, we had one life insurance contract with a death benefit of $1.4 million. At April 27,
2014, we had two life insurance contracts with a death benefit of $3.9 million. Our cash surrender value -
life insurance balance of $339,000 and $644,000 at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively, are
collectible upon death of the respective insured.
8. ACCRUED EXPENSES
A summary of accrued expenses follows:
(dollars in thousands)
compensation, commissions and related benefits
interest
other
9.
INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Expense and Effective Income Tax Rate
Total income tax expense was allocated as follows:
May 3,
2015
9,081
37
2,011
11,129
$
$
April 27,
2014
7,388
71
1,722
9,181
(dollars in thousands)
income from operations
shareholders’ equity, related to
the tax benefit arising from stock
based compensation
2014
1,596
(143)
1,453
2013
1,972
(76)
1,896
2015
$ 7,885
(109)
$ 7,776
64
Income tax expense attributable to income from operations consists of:
(dollars in thousands)
current
federal
state
foreign
deferred
federal
state
undistributed earnings – foreign subsidiaries
U.S. operating loss carryforwards
foreign
valuation allowance
$
2015
-
(7)
4,713
4,706
(849)
(52)
(260)
4,487
(92)
(55)
3,179
$ 7,885
2014
-
-
3,323
3,323
1,065
416
(5,018)
1,838
(42)
14
(1,727)
1,596
2013
-
19
2,297
2,316
192
14
7,011
3,665
608
(11,834)
(344)
1,972
Income (loss) before income taxes related to the company’s foreign and U.S. operations consists of:
(dollars in thousands)
Foreign
China
Canada
Poland
Total Foreign
United States
2015
2014
2013
$ 12,531
2,695
(260)
14,966
7,990
$ 22,956
11,512
2,149
(370)
13,291
5,752
19,043
10,593
2,075
(630)
12,038
8,251
20,289
The following schedule summarizes the principal differences between the income tax expense at the
federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate reflected in the consolidated financial
statements:
federal income tax rate
foreign tax rate differential
increase in the liability for uncertain tax positions
undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries
change in valuation allowance
other
2015
34.0%
(6.7)
3.7
3.0
(0.2)
0.5
34.3%
2014
34.0%
(7.2)
4.3
(26.3)
0.1
3.5
8.4%
2013
34.0%
(6.7)
4.0
34.6
(58.3)
2.1
9.7%
65
Deferred Income Taxes
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and
liabilities consist of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
deferred tax assets:
accounts receivable
inventories
compensation
liabilities and other
alternative minimum tax credit
property, plant and equipment (1)
loss carryforwards – U.S.
loss carryforwards – foreign
unrecognized tax benefits – U.S.
valuation allowances
total deferred tax assets
deferred tax liabilities:
undistributed earnings on foreign subsidiaries
property, plant and equipment (2)
goodwill
other
total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax asset
2015
2014
$
$
444
2,251
4,497
1,155
1,320
447
12,133
361
(10,349)
(922)
11,337
(1,733)
(4,022)
(1,197)
(198)
(7,150)
4,187
274
1,801
3,200
1,109
1,320
572
17,161
311
(9,778)
(977)
14,993
(1,993)
(4,581)
(1,028)
(134)
(7,736)
7,257
(1) Pertains to the company’s operations located in China.
(2) Pertains to the company’s operations located in the U.S. and Canada.
Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards were $32.2 million with related future tax benefits of
$12.1 million at May 3, 2015. These carryforwards principally expire in 11-19 years, fiscal 2026 through
fiscal 2034. The company also has an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward of approximately $1.3
million for federal income tax purposes that does not expire.
At May 3, 2015, the current deferred tax asset of $4.8 million represents $4.4 million and $421,000 from
our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At May 3, 2015, the non-current deferred tax
asset of $447,000 pertained to our operations located in China. At May 3, 2015, the non-current deferred
tax liability of $1.1 million represents $896,000 and $154,000 from our operations located in Canada and
U.S., respectively.
At April 27, 2014, the current deferred tax asset of $6.2 million represents $5.8 million and $372,000
from our operations located in the U.S. and China, respectively. At April 27, 2014, the non-current
deferred tax asset of $2.0 million represents $1.4 million and $572,000 from our operations located in the
U.S. and China, respectively. At April 27, 2014, the non-current deferred tax liability of $1.0 million
pertained to our operations located in Canada.
Deferred Income Taxes – Valuation Allowance
Summary
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we evaluate our deferred income taxes to determine if a valuation
allowance is required. ASC Topic 740 requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance
should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not”
standard with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Since the
company operates in multiple jurisdictions, we assess the need for a valuation allowance on a jurisdiction-
66
by-jurisdiction basis, taking into account the effects of local tax law. Based on our assessment at May 3,
2015, we recorded a partial valuation allowance of $922,000, of which $561,000 pertained to certain U.S.
state net operating loss carryforwards and credits and $361,000 pertained to loss carryforwards associated
with our Culp Europe operation located in Poland. Based on our assessment at April 27, 2014, we
recorded a partial valuation allowance of $977,000, of which $666,000 pertained to certain U.S. state net
operating loss carryforwards and credits and $311,000 pertained to loss carryforwards associated with our
Culp Europe operation located in Poland.
No valuation allowance was recorded against our net deferred tax assets associated with our operations
located in China and Canada at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively.
United States
Our net deferred tax asset regarding our U.S. operations includes U.S. loss carryforwards totaling $32.2
million, $45.7 million, and $50.7 million at May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014, and April 28, 2013,
respectively.
Fiscal 2013
Due to the favorable results of our multi-year restructuring process in our upholstery fabric operations and
key acquisitions and capital investments made in our mattress fabric operations, our U.S operations'
financial results started to improve in fiscal 2011 and this improvement continued through the second
quarter of fiscal 2013. Our U.S. operations earned a pre-tax income on a cumulative three-year basis as of
April 29, 2012 (the end of our fiscal 2012) of $11.9 million and an additional $3.4 million through the
second quarter of fiscal 2013.
This continued earnings improvement from our U.S. operations was primarily due to the operating
performance of our mattress fabric operations. Through the second quarter of fiscal 2013, our mattress
fabric operations had net sales that totaled $77.7 million, an increase of 15% compared with $67.4 million
through the second quarter of fiscal 2012. In addition, our mattress fabric operations reported operating
income of $10.3 million through the second quarter of fiscal 2013, an increase of 49% compared with
$7.0 million through the second quarter of fiscal 2012. These improved results through the second quarter
of fiscal 2013, which were better than expected, were attributed to the evolution of the bedding industry
into a more decorative business with growing consumer demand for better bedding and a higher quality
mattress fabric, and the stabilization of raw material prices.
Based on the positive evidence at the end of our second quarter of fiscal 2013, as supported by our
cumulative earnings history, current and expected earnings improvement driven by our U.S. mattress
fabric operations, and the significant source of U.S. taxable income from the undistributed earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries (see separate section below), we recorded an income tax benefit of $12.2 million to
reverse substantially all of the valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets that we
concluded were more likely than not to be realized. In the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we recorded an
income tax charge of $103,000, due to a change in our second quarter estimate of the recoverability of our
U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards.
After this valuation allowance reversal of $12.1 million, we had a remaining valuation allowance against
our U.S. net deferred tax assets totaling $722,000 as of April 28, 2013. This valuation allowance
pertained to certain U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits in which it is “more likely than
not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits would not be realized prior to their
respective expiration dates.
Fiscal 2014
At April 27, 2014, we had a remaining valuation allowance against our U.S net deferred tax assets
totaling $666,000. This valuation allowance pertained to U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and
67
credits in which it is “more likely than not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and
credits would not be realized prior to their respective expiration dates. In fiscal 2014, we recorded an
income tax benefit of $56,000 that reduced our valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax
assets. This income tax benefit pertained to a change in estimate of the recoverability of our U.S. state net
loss operating carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2014.
Fiscal 2015
At May 3, 2015, we had a remaining valuation allowance against our U.S net deferred tax assets totaling
$561,000. This valuation allowance pertained to U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits in
which it is “more likely than not” that these U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards and credits would
not be realized prior to their respective expiration dates. In fiscal 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit
of $105,000 that reduced our valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets. This income
tax benefit pertained to a change in estimate of the recoverability of our U.S. state net loss operating
carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2015.
Poland
During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we established Culp Europe, a wholly-owned subsidiary located in
Poland. Due to the initial start up costs of setting up this operation and the current state of the European
economy, this operation had a history of cumulative pre-tax losses.
Based on the negative evidence, as supported by our cumulative pre-tax loss history and the short
carryforward period of 5 years imposed by the Polish government, we recorded a full valuation allowance
against Culp Europe’s net deferred tax assets commencing in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As of May
3, 2015, we recorded a full valuation allowance against Culp Europe’s net deferred tax assets totaling
$361,000.
Change in Valuation Allowance
In fiscal 2015, we recorded an income tax benefit of $55,000 for a reduction of our valuation allowance.
This $55,000 reduction represents an income tax benefit of $105,000 for a change in estimate of the
recoverability of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards, partially offset by an income tax charge
of $50,000 for an increase in the full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets associated
with our Culp Europe operations located in Poland.
In fiscal 2014, we recorded an income tax charge of $14,000 for an increase of our valuation allowance.
The $14,000 increase represents an income tax charge of $70,000 for an increase in the full valuation
allowance against our net deferred tax assets associated with our Culp Europe operations located in
Poland, partially offset by an income tax benefit of $56,000 for a change in estimate of the recoverability
of our U.S. state net loss operating carryforwards at the end of fiscal 2014.
In fiscal 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $11.8 million for the reduction of our valuation
allowance. This $11.8 million decrease represents a $12.1 million income tax benefit pertaining to a
change in judgment about the future realization of our U.S. net deferred tax assets, partially offset by an
income tax charge of $241,000 for the establishment of a full valuation allowance against our net deferred
tax assets associated with our Culp Europe operations located in Poland.
Deferred Income Taxes – Undistributed Earnings from Foreign Subsidiaries
In accordance with ASC Topic 740, we assess whether the undistributed earnings from our foreign
subsidiaries will be reinvested indefinitely or eventually distributed to our U.S. parent company. ASC
Topic 740 requires that a deferred tax liability should be recorded for undistributed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries that will not be reinvested indefinitely. Also, we assess the recognition of U.S. foreign
income tax credits associated with foreign withholding and income tax payments and whether it is more-
68
likely-than-not that our foreign income tax credits will not be realized. If it is determined that any foreign
income tax credits need to be recognized or it is more-likely-than-not our foreign income tax credits will
not be realized, an adjustment to our provision for income taxes will be recognized at that time.
Fiscal 2013
Prior to the second quarter of fiscal 2013, it was management’s intention to indefinitely reinvest all of our
undistributed foreign earnings. Accordingly, no deferred tax liability had been recorded in connection
with the future repatriation of these earnings.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we assessed the financial requirements of our U.S. parent
company and foreign subsidiaries and determined that our undistributed earnings from our foreign
subsidiaries totaling $55.6 million would not be reinvested indefinitely and would be eventually
distributed to our U.S. parent company. The financial requirements of the U.S. parent company changed
due to a decision to return cash to its shareholders through dividend payments and common stock
repurchases. Also, in order to keep up with the recent growth in consumer demand for better bedding and
a higher quality mattress fabric, it was our intention to continue our investment in our domestic mattress
fabric operations. As a result of this assessment, we recorded a deferred tax liability and corresponding
income tax charge of $6.6 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and an additional $400,000 in
the last half of fiscal 2013.
At April 28, 2013, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $56.7
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $7.0 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $22.0 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $15.0 million.
Fiscal 2014
During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, our operations in China achieved positive accumulated earnings
and profits for both U.S. income tax and financial reporting purposes for the first time since we
determined our undistributed earnings from foreign subsidiaries would not be reinvested indefinitely in
the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As a result, we recorded an income tax benefit of $5.4 million to
recognize U.S. foreign income tax credits of $9.9 million offset by the U.S. income tax effects of the
undistributed earnings from our China operations and foreign withholding taxes totaling $4.5 million.
This $5.4 million income tax benefit was treated as a discrete event in which the full income tax benefits
of this adjustment were recorded in the third quarter and full fiscal year 2014, as it pertained to a change
in judgment on prior periods’ accumulated earnings and profits associated with our subsidiaries located in
China.
In addition, an income tax charge of $352,000 was recorded during fiscal 2014 for the U.S. income tax
effects of the undistributed earnings and foreign withholding taxes incurred in fiscal 2014 from our
Canadian operations and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 from our China operations.
At April 27, 2014, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $72.8
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $2.0 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $28.1 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $26.1 million.
Fiscal 2015
An income tax charge of $695,000 was recorded during fiscal 2015 for the U.S. income tax effects of the
undistributed earnings and foreign withholding taxes incurred in fiscal 2015 from our Canadian and China
operations.
69
At May 3, 2015, we had accumulated earnings and profits from our foreign subsidiaries totaling $85.2
million. At the same date, the deferred tax liability associated with our undistributed earnings from our
foreign subsidiaries totaled $1.7 million, which included U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes
totaling $32.4 million, offset by U.S. foreign income tax credits of $30.7 million.
Uncertainty in Income Taxes
The following table sets forth the change in the company’s unrecognized tax benefit:
(dollars in thousands) 2015
beginning balance
increases from prior period tax positions
decreases from prior period tax positions
increases from current period tax positions
ending balance
(187)
-
$ 14,141
$13,740
588
2014
13,166
756
2013
12,462
812
(182) (108)
-
13,166
-
13,740
At May 3, 2015, we had $14.1 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $3.8 million
would favorably affect the income tax rate in future periods. At April 27, 2014, we had $13.7 million of
total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $4.0 million would favorably affect the income tax rate in
future periods.
As of May 3, 2015, we had $14.1 million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $10.3 million
and $3.8 million were classified as net non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable-long-
term, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of April 27, 2014, we had $13.7
million of total gross unrecognized tax benefits, of which $9.7 million and $4.0 million were classified as
net non-current deferred income taxes and income taxes payable- long-term, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
We elected to classify interest and penalties as part of income tax expense. At May 3, 2015 and April 27,
2014, the gross amount of interest and penalties due to unrecognized tax benefits was $844,000 and
$755,000, respectively.
The liability for uncertain tax positions at May 3, 2015, includes $14.1 million related to tax positions for
which significant change is reasonably possible in fiscal 2016. This amount relates to double taxation
under applicable tax treaties with foreign tax jurisdictions. United States federal and state income tax
returns filed by the company remain subject to examination for tax years 2005 and subsequent due to loss
carryforwards. Canadian federal returns remain subject to examination for tax years 2008 and subsequent.
Canadian provincial (Quebec) returns remain subject to examination for tax years 2011 and subsequent.
Income tax returns for the company’s China subsidiaries are subject to examination for tax years 2010
and subsequent.
Income Taxes Paid
Income tax payments, net of income tax refunds, were $4.8 million in fiscal 2015, $3.0 million in 2014,
and $2.8 million in 2013.
10. LONG-TERM DEBT AND LINES OF CREDIT
A summary of long-term debt follows:
May 3, April 27,
2014
4,400
(2,200)
2,200
(dollars in thousands)
unsecured senior term notes
current maturities of long-term debt
long-term debt, less current maturities
2015
2,200
(2,200)
-
$
$
70
Unsecured Term Notes
We entered into a note agreement dated August 11, 2008 that provided for the issuance of $11.0 million
of unsecured term notes with a fixed interest rate of 8.01% and a term of seven years. Principal payments
of $2.2 million per year are due on the notes beginning August 11, 2011. The remaining principal
payments are payable over an average term of 0.3 years through August 11, 2015. Any principal
prepayments would be assessed a penalty as defined in the agreement. The agreement contains customary
financial and other covenants as defined in the agreement.
As of May 3, 2015, we have one remaining annual payment of $2.2 million due on August 11, 2015.
Revolving Credit Agreement –United States
As of May 3, 2015, we have an unsecured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo')
that provided for an unsecured revolving loan commitment of $10.0 million to be used to finance working
capital and general corporate purposes. The amount of borrowings that were outstanding under the credit
agreement with Culp Europe at April 27, 2014, noted below decreased the $10.0 million available.
Interest was charged at a rate (applicable interest rate of 1.78% and 1.75% at May 3, 2015 and April 27,
2014, respectively) equal to the one-month LIBOR rate plus a spread based on the ratio of debt to
EBITDA as defined in the agreement. The Credit Agreement contained customary financial and other
covenants as defined in the agreement and was set to expire August 31, 2015.
Our credit agreement with Wells Fargo contained a financial covenant that limited our capital
expenditures to $10 million in any fiscal year. Effective March 3, 2015, Wells Fargo increased our capital
expenditure limit from $10 million to $12 million for fiscal 2015, as a result of the capital expansion plan
associated with our mattress fabrics segment. Our capital expenditures were $10.5 million for fiscal 2015,
and as a result, we are not in violation of this financial covenant.
Effective July 10, 2015, we amended the Credit Agreement to extend the expiration date to August 31,
2017 and maintain the annual capital expenditure limit of $12 million noted above.
At May 3, 2015, and April 27, 2014, there were $250,000 and $195,000 in outstanding letters of credit
(all of which related to workers compensation) provided by the Credit Agreement. There were no
borrowings outstanding under the agreement associated with our U.S. operations at May 3, 2015, and
April 27, 2014.
Revolving Credit Agreement - China
We have an unsecured credit agreement associated with our operations in China that provides for a line of
credit up to 40 million RMB (approximately $6.4 million USD at May 3, 2015), expiring on February 9,
2016. This agreement has an interest rate determined by the Chinese government. There were no
borrowings under this agreement as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014.
Revolving Credit Agreement – Culp Europe
At April 27, 2014, we had an unsecured credit agreement with Wells Fargo that incurred interest at
WIBOR (Warsaw Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2% (applicable interest rate of 4.38% at April 27, 2014).
There were $586,000 (1.8 million Polish Zloty) in borrowings outstanding under the agreement at April
27, 2014.
Effective May 2, 2014, we converted our 1.8 million Polish Zloty ($586,000 USD) denominated
borrowings under this agreement to EURO denominated borrowings totaling €424,000 ($588,000 USD).
In addition, our applicable interest rate was converted to EURO LIBOR plus 2%.
71
At May 3, 2015, no borrowings were outstanding this agreement, as the outstanding balance was paid in
full during the second quarter of fiscal 2015.
Overall
Our loan agreements require, among other things, that we maintain compliance with certain financial
covenants. At May 3, 2015, the company was in compliance with these financial covenants.
Interest paid during 2015, 2014, and 2013 totaled $268,000 $466,000, and $666,000, respectively.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
We lease certain office, manufacturing and warehouse facilities and equipment under noncancellable
operating leases. Lease terms related to real estate primarily range from three to five years with renewal
options for additional periods ranging up to nine years. The leases generally require the company to pay
real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and other expenses. Rental expense for operating leases was $2.9
million in fiscal 2015, $2.7 million in fiscal 2014, and $2.4 million in fiscal 2013. Future minimum rental
commitments for noncancellable operating leases are $2.6 million in fiscal 2016; $1.5 million in fiscal 2017;
$645,000 in fiscal 2018, $76,000 in fiscal 2019, and $23,000 in fiscal 2020. Management expects that in the
normal course of business, these leases will be renewed or replaced by other operating leases.
We lease a plant facility associated with our mattress fabrics segment from a partnership owned by certain
shareholders and officers of the company and their immediate families. At April 27, 2014, this lease was on
a month to month basis at an amount of $12,704 per month. Effective October 1, 2014, we entered into a
new lease agreement with the partnership noted above. The new lease agreement requires monthly payments
of $13,000 for a three year term commencing on October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2017. This lease
contains two successive options to renew the lease with each renewal period being three years. The first and
second renewal terms would require monthly payments of $13,100 and $13,200, respectively.
Rents paid to entities owned by certain shareholders and officers of the company and their immediate
families totaled $155,000 in fiscal 2015 and $152,000 in each of fiscal 2014 and 2013.
Chromatex Environmental Claim
A lawsuit was filed against us and other defendants (Chromatex, Inc., Rossville Industries, Inc., Rossville
Companies, Inc. and Rossville Investments, Inc.) on February 5, 2008 in the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs are Alan Shulman, Stanley Siegel, Ruth
Cherenson as Personal Representative of Estate of Alan Cherenson, and Adrienne Rolla and M.F. Rolla as
Executors of the Estate of Joseph Byrnes. The plaintiffs were partners in a general partnership that
formerly owned a manufacturing plant in West Hazleton, Pennsylvania (the “Site”). Approximately two
years after this general partnership sold the Site to defendants Chromatex, Inc. and Rossville Industries,
Inc., we leased and operated the Site as part of our Rossville/Chromatex division. The lawsuit involves
court judgments that have been entered against the plaintiffs and against defendant Chromatex, Inc.
requiring them to pay costs incurred by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”)
responding to environmental contamination at the Site, in amounts approximating $14 million, plus
unspecified future environmental costs. Neither USEPA nor any other governmental authority has
asserted any claim against us on account of these matters. The plaintiffs seek contribution from us and
other defendants and a declaration that the company and the other defendants are responsible for
environmental response costs under environmental laws and certain agreements. The plaintiffs also
asserted that we tortiously interfered with contracts between them and other defendants in the case and
diverted assets to prevent the plaintiffs from being paid monies owed to them. We have defended
72
ourselves vigorously with regards to the matters described in this litigation. In addition, we have an
indemnification agreement with certain other defendants in the litigation pursuant to which the other
defendants agreed to indemnify us for any damages we incur as a result of the environmental matters that
are the subject of this litigation, although it is unclear whether the indemnitors have significant assets at
this time.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the parties to this lawsuit reached a tentative settlement of all matters,
which would require us to contribute cash to a global settlement fund. Consequently, we recorded a
charge of $206,000 to other expense in the fiscal 2014 Consolidated Statement of Net Income. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, we paid the $206,000 tentative settlement amount. Subsequently, the
settlement was reviewed by the government and during the first quarter of fiscal 2015 the court approved
the final agreement by the parties involved. The lawsuit was dismissed on June 5, 2014.
Other Litigation
The company is involved in legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of
business. Management has determined that it is not reasonably possible that these actions, when ultimately
concluded and settled, will have a material adverse effect upon the financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows of the company.
Purchase Commitments
At May 3, 2015, and April 27, 2014, we had open purchase commitments to acquire equipment for our
mattress fabrics segment totaling $2.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Equity Incentive Plan Description
On September 20, 2007, our shareholders approved an equity incentive plan entitled the Culp, Inc. 2007
Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The types of equity based awards available for grant under the
2007 Plan include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units,
performance units, and other discretionary awards as determined by our Compensation Committee. An
aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2007 Plan. In
conjunction with the approval of the 2007 Plan, our 2002 Stock Option Plan was terminated (with the
exception of currently outstanding options) and no additional options will be granted under the 2002
Stock Plan. At May 3, 2015, there were 577,799 shares available for future equity based grants under the
company’s 2007 Plan.
Stock Options
Under our 2007 Plan, employees, directors, and others associated with the company may be granted
options to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value on the date of grant.
No options were granted to employees in fiscal 2015, 2014 or 2013, respectively.
No options were granted to outside directors during fiscal years 2015 and 2014
During fiscal year 2013, an outside director was granted 2,000 option shares to purchase shares of
common stock at the fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted to outside directors vest
immediately on the date of grant (October each fiscal year) and expire ten years after the date of grant.
73
The fair value of stock options granted to an outside director during fiscal 2013 was $5.03, using the
following assumptions:
2015
Risk-free interest rate -
Dividend yield -
Expected volatility -
Expected term (in years) -
2014
-
-
-
-
2013
0.67%
3.00%
61.70%
5
The fair value of the above option award was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-
pricing model. The assumptions utilized in the model are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect
market conditions, actual historical experience, and groups of participants that have similar exercise
patterns that are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free interest rate for periods within
the contractual life of the option was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The dividend yield is based on historical experience and future dividend yields in effect at the time of
grant. The expected volatility was derived using a term structure based on historical volatility and the
volatility implied by exchange-traded options on the company’s common stock. The expected term of the
options is based on the contractual term of the stock option award, and expected participant exercise
trends.
No compensation expense was recorded for incentive stock options in fiscal 2015 as all incentive stock
option awards were fully vested at the end of fiscal 2014. The company recorded compensation expense
of $10,000 and $62,000 within selling, general, and administrative expense for incentive stock options in
fiscal 2014 and 2013.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013:
2015
2014
2013
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
outstanding at beginning
of year
granted
exercised
canceled/expired
outstanding at end of year
153,950 $
-
(10,100)
(3,750)
140,100
6.70
-
9.31
7.27
6.49
182,825 $ 6.99
-
8.40
9.28
6.70
-
(23,125)
(5,750)
153,950
209,475 $ 7.22
12.13
8.92
9.37
6.99
2,000
(23,025)
(5,625)
182,825
Range of
Exercise Prices
$1.88 - $ 1.88
$ 4.59 - $ 5.41
$7.08 - $ 9.57
$10.11 - $12.13
Options Outstanding
Number Weighted-Avg.
Outstanding
Remaining Weighted-Avg.
at 5/03/15 Contractual Life Exercise Price
3.7 years
0.8
2.3
7.4
2.7
$1.88
$4.86
$8.48
$12.13
$6.49
40,000
6,000
92,100
2,000
140,100
Options Exercisable
Number
Exercisable Weighted-Avg.
at 5/03/15 Exercise Price
$1.88
40,000
$4.86
6,000
$8.48
92,100
2,000 $12.13
$6.49
140,100
At May 3, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value for options outstanding and exercisable was $2.7 million.
74
The aggregate intrinsic value for options exercised was $87,000, $224,000, and $90,000, in fiscal 2015,
2014, and 2013, respectively.
At May 3, 2015, there were no unvested incentive stock option awards. Therefore, there was no
unrecognized compensation cost related to the incentive stock option awards at May 3, 2015.
Time Vested Restricted Stock Awards
On July 1, 2009 (fiscal 2010), two executive officers were granted 80,000 shares of time vested restricted
common stock. This time vested restricted stock award vested in equal one-third installments on July 1,
2012, 2013, and 2014. The fair value (the closing price of the company’s common stock) of this restricted
stock award is measured at the date of grant (July 1, 2009) and was $5.08 per share.
On January 7, 2009 (fiscal 2009), certain key management employees and a non-employee were granted
115,000 shares of time vested restricted common stock. Of these 115,000 shares, 105,000 and 10,000
were granted to employees and a non-employee, respectively. This time vested restricted stock award
vested in equal one-third installments on May 1, 2012, 2013, and 2014. The fair value (the closing price
of the company’s common stock) of this restricted stock award for key management employees was
measured at the date of grant (January 7, 2009) and was $1.88 per share. The fair value (the closing price
of the company’s common stock) of this restricted stock award for the non-employee is measured at the
earlier date when the service period is met or the end of each reporting period. The fair value of the one-
third installment that vested on May 1, 2012, May 1, 2013, and May 1, 2014 was $11.05, $16.25, and
$18.61, respectively.
The following table summarizes the time vested restricted stock activity for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013:
2015 2014 2013
Shares
Shares
Shares
outstanding at beginning
of year
granted
vested
outstanding at end of year
61,668
-
(61,668)
-
123,335
-
(61,667)
61,668
185,000
-
(61,665)
123,335
During fiscal 2015, 61,668 shares of time vested restricted stock vested and had a weighted average fair
value of $257,000 or $4.17 per share. During fiscal 2014, 61,667 shares of time vested restricted stock
vested and had a weighted average fair value of $249,000 or $4.04 per share. During fiscal 2013, 61,665
shares of time vested restricted stock vested and had a weighted average fair value of $232,000 or $3.76
per share.
At May 3, 2015, there were no shares of time vested restricted stock outstanding and unvested. At April
27, 2014, there were 61,668 shares of time vested restricted stock outstanding and unvested. Of the
61,668 shares outstanding and unvested, 35,000 shares were granted on January 7, 2009 and 26,668
shares were granted on July 1, 2009. At April 27, 2014, the weighted average fair value of these
outstanding and unvested shares was $4.17 per share.
At May 3, 2015, there were no outstanding and unvested shares of time vested restricted stock. Therefore,
there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to time vested restricted stock awards at May 3,
2015.
We recorded compensation expense of $4,000, $62,000, and $140,000 within selling, general, and
administrative expense for time vested restricted stock awards in fiscal 2015, 2014, and fiscal 2013,
respectively.
75
Performance Based Restricted Stock Units
Fiscal 2015
On June 24, 2014, certain key members of management were granted performance based restricted
common stock units which could earn up to 102,845 shares of common stock if certain performance
targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based
on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $17.70 per share, which
represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over
the requisite service period of three years.
On March 3, 2015, a non-employee was granted performance based restricted stock units which could
earn up to 28,000 shares of common stock if certain performance targets are met as defined in the related
restricted stock unit agreements. The fair value of this award is measured at the earlier date of when the
performance criteria are met or the end of the reporting period. At May 3, 2015, this grant was unvested
and was measured at $26.02 per share, which represents the closing price of the company’s common
stock at the end of the reporting period. The vesting of these awards is over the requisite service period of
16 months and 28 months for performance based restricted stock units which could earn up to 12,000 and
16,000 shares of common stock, respectively.
Fiscal 2014
On June 25, 2013, certain key members of management were granted performance based restricted
common stock units which could earn up to 72,380 shares of common stock if certain performance targets
are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based on the
fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $17.12 per share, which
represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over
the requisite service period of three years.
Fiscal 2013
On July 11, 2012, certain key members of management were granted performance based restricted
common stock units which could earn up to 120,000 shares of common stock if certain performance
targets are met as defined in the related restricted stock unit agreements. These awards were valued based
on the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair value of these awards was $10.21 per share, which
represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The vesting of these awards is over
the requisite service period of three years.
Overall
We recorded compensation expense of $727,000, $581,000 and $340,000 within selling, general, and
administrative expense for performance based restricted stock units in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Compensation cost is recorded based on an assessment each reporting period of the
probability that certain performance goals will be met during the vesting period. If performance goals are
not probable of occurrence, no compensation cost will be recognized and any recognized compensation
cost would be reversed.
At May 3, 2015, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to the performance based
restricted stock units was $1.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
vesting period of 1.9 years.
76
Common Stock Awards
On October 1, 2014, we granted a total of 3,000 shares of common stock to our outside directors. These
shares of common stock vested immediately and were measured at $17.95 per share, which represents the
closing price of the company's common stock at the date of grant.
On October 1, 2013, we granted a total of 3,000 shares of common stock to our outside directors. These
shares of common stock vested immediately and were measured at $18.84 per share, which represents the
closing price of the company's common stock at the date of grant.
On October 8, 2012, we granted a total of 1,658 shares of common stock to certain outside directors.
These shares of common stock vested immediately and were measured at $12.13 per share, which
represents the closing price of the company’s common stock at the date of grant.
We recorded $55,000, $57,000, and $20,000 of compensation expense within selling, general, and
administrative expense for these common stock awards for fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Other Share-Based Arrangements
Effective May 2, 2011, we entered into an agreement in which we granted a non-employee a stock
appreciation right that was indexed on 70,000 shares of our common stock. This agreement required us to
settle in cash an amount equal to $35,000, plus the excess, if any, over a stock appreciation right value of
$700,000 at May 2, 2011. This stock appreciation right value of $700,000 represented the 70,000 indexed
shares of common stock noted above measured at the closing price per share of $10.00 at May 2, 2011.
The cash settlement in connection with the stock appreciation right value represented the difference
between a stock appreciation right value that is indexed on the 70,000 shares of common stock noted
above and the highest closing price per share of our common stock for the period May 2, 2011 through
June 30, 2012 (limited to $12.00 per share) and the $700,000 stock appreciate right value at May 2, 2011.
This award vested over the period May 2, 2011 through June 30, 2012 and represented the non-
employee’s required service period.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, this award fully vested and was paid out at a fair value totaling
$174,000.
We recorded $40,000 of compensation expense within selling, general, and administrative expense for
this agreement during fiscal 2013.
13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between assumptions based on market
data (observable inputs) and the company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). Determining where an
asset or liability falls within that hierarchy depends on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement as a whole. An adjustment to the pricing method used within either level 1 or level 2
inputs could generate a fair value measurement that effectively falls in a lower level in the hierarchy. The
hierarchy consists of three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Inputs other than level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable, and
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs developed using the company’s estimates and assumptions, which reflect
those that market participants would use.
77
Recurring Basis
The following table presents information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Fair value measurements at May 3, 2015 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Limited Term Bond Fund
Premier Money Market Fund
Intermediate Term Bond Fund
Low Duration Bond Fund
Strategic Income Fund
Growth Allocation Fund
Other
$ 3,107
2,285
2,181
2,096
1,008
85
45
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$3,107
2,285
2,181
2,096
1,008
85
45
Fair value measurements at April 27, 2014 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Limited Term Bond Fund
Low Duration Bond Fund
Intermediate Term Bond Fund
Premier Money Market Fund
Other
$ 2,576
2,077
1,641
755
10
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$2,576
2,077
1,641
755
10
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We
evaluate our hierarchy disclosures each quarter based on various factors and it is possible that an asset or
liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, we expect that changes in
classifications between different levels will be rare.
The fair value of the company’s long-term debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows at rates
currently offered to the company for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. At May 3, 2015,
the carrying value of the company’s long-term debt was $2.2 million and the fair value was $2.3 million.
At April 27, 2014, the carrying value of the company’s long-term debt was $4.4 million and the fair value
was $4.6 million.
Nonrecurring Basis
During fiscal 2015, we did not have any financial assets that were required to be measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis.
As of April 27, 2014, we had no assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis other than the assets acquired from Bodet & Horst (see note 2) that were acquired at fair value.
78
Fair value measurements at April 27, 2014 using:
Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets
Significant other
observable inputs
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(amounts in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Assets:
Equipment
Non-compete Agreement
Customer Relationships
$ -
-
-
$ 890
-
-
$ -
882
868
$ 890
882
868
The equipment was classified as level 2 as the fair value was determined using quoted market prices from
a third party. The non-compete agreement was recorded at its fair value using a discounted cash flow
valuation model that used significant unobservable inputs and was classified as level 3. The customer
relationships were recorded at fair value using a multi-period excess earnings valuation model that used
significant unobservable inputs and was classified as level 3.
14. NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted net income per share uses the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during
the period plus the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation calculated using the treasury stock
method. Weighted average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted net income per share are
as follows:
(in thousands)
weighted-average common
shares outstanding, basic
dilutive effect of stock-based compensation
weighted-average common
shares outstanding, diluted
2015
2014
2013
12,217
205
12,177
237
12,235
215
12,422
12,414
12,450
All options to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of diluted net income
for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, as the exercise price of the options was less than the average market
price of common shares.
At May 3, 2015, there were no outstanding and unvested shares of time vested restricted common stock
and therefore, the computation of basic net income per share was not affected. The computation of basic
net income did not include 61,668 and 123,335 shares of time vested restricted common stock as these
shares were unvested for fiscal 2014 and 2013.
15. BENEFIT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plans
The company has defined contribution plans which cover substantially all employees and provides for
participant contributions on a pre-tax basis and matching contributions by the company for its U.S. and
Canadian operations. Our contributions to the plan were $798,000, $696,000, and $635,000 in fiscal years
2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
79
Deferred Compensation Plan
We have a nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) covering officers and certain key
members of management. The Plan provides for participant deferrals on a pre-tax basis that are subject to
annual deferral limits by the IRS and non-elective contributions made by the company. Participant
deferrals and non-elective contributions made by the company are immediately vested.
Our contributions to the Plan were $174,000 for fiscal 2015, $166,000 for fiscal 2014, and $145,000 for
fiscal 2013, respectively. Our nonqualified deferred compensation plan liability of $4.0 million and $2.6
million at May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, were recorded in deferred compensation in the 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2014, we established a Rabbi Trust (the “Trust”) to set aside funds for the
participants of the Plan and enable the participants to direct their contributions to various investment
options in the Plan. The investment options of the Plan consist of a money market fund and various
mutual funds. The funds set aside in the Trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors in the
event of the company’s insolvency as defined in the Plan.
The investment assets of the Trust are recorded at their fair value of $2.4 million and $765,000 at May 3,
2015 and April 27, 2014, and were recorded in long-term investments in the 2015 and 2014 Consolidated
Balance Sheets, respectively. The investment assets of the Trust are classified as available for sale and
accordingly, changes in their fair values are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The company’s operations are classified into two business segments: mattress fabrics and upholstery
fabrics. The mattress fabrics segment manufacturers, sources, and sells fabrics and mattress covers to
bedding manufacturers. The upholstery fabrics segment manufacturers, sources, and sells fabrics
primarily to residential furniture manufacturers.
Net sales denominated in U.S. dollars accounted for 84%, 82% and 85% of total consolidated net sales in
2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. International sales accounted for 22%, 19% and 23% of net sales in
2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, and are summarized by geographic area as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
north america (excluding USA) (1)
far east and asia (2)
all other areas
2015
$ 30,758
31,855
4,720
$ 67,333
2014
2013
15,556
33,487
6,041
55,084
11,900
43,907
5,806
61,613
(1) Of this amount, $24.1 million, $9.3 million, and $3.2 million are attributable to shipments to
Mexico in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
(2) Of this amount $26.5 million, $32.2 million, and $42.1 million are attributable to shipment to
China in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
Sales are attributed to individual countries based upon location that the company ships its products to for
delivery to customers.
80
The company evaluates the operating performance of its segments based upon income from operations
before certain unallocated corporate expenses, and other non-recurring items. Cost of sales in both
segments include costs to manufacture or source our products, including costs such as raw material and
finished goods purchases, direct and indirect labor, overhead and incoming freight charges. Unallocated
corporate expenses primarily represent compensation and benefits for certain executive officers, all costs
related to being a public company, and other miscellaneous expenses. Segment assets include assets used
in operations of each segment and primarily consist of accounts receivable, inventories, and property,
plant, and equipment. The mattress fabrics segment also includes in segment assets, goodwill, a non-
compete agreement and customer relationships associated with an acquisition.
Statements of operations for the company’s operating segments are as follows:
2015
2014
2013
(dollars in thousands)
net sales:
upholstery fabrics
mattress fabrics
gross profit:
upholstery fabrics
mattress fabrics
(dollars in thousands)
selling, general, and administrative expenses:
upholstery fabrics
mattress fabrics
unallocated corporate
total selling, general, and administrative
expenses
Income from operations:
upholstery fabrics
mattress fabrics
total segment income from operations
unallocated corporate expenses
total income from operations
interest expense
interest income
other expense
income before income taxes
126,457
160,705
287,162
21,429
27,477
48,906
114,800
154,014
268,814
19,984
29,546
49,530
$ 130,427
179,739
$ 310,166
22,690
32,877
55,567
$
$
$
2015
2014
2013
14,562
11,206
7,010
13,393
9,962
5,302
13,031
9,646
5,768
$
32,778
28,657
28,445
$
$
8,128
21,671
29,799
(7,010)
22,789
(64)
622
(391)
22,956
8,036
17,515
25,551
(5,302)
20,249
(427)
482
(1,261)
19,043
6,953
19,900
26,853
(5,768)
21,085
(632)
419
(583)
20,289
One customer within the upholstery fabrics segment represented 13% of consolidated net sales in fiscal
years 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Two customers within the mattress fabrics segment represented
20%, 21%, and 22% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. No customers
within the upholstery fabrics segment accounted for 10% or more of net accounts receivable as of May 3,
2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively. One customer within the mattress fabrics segment accounted for
10% and 11% of net accounts receivable balance as of May 3, 2015 and April 27, 2014, respectively.
81
Balance sheet information for the company’s operating segments follow:
(dollars in thousands)
segment assets
mattress fabrics
current assets (1)
non-compete agreements, net
customer relationships
goodwill
property, plant, and equipment
total mattress fabrics assets
upholstery fabrics
current assets (2)
property, plant, and equipment
total upholstery fabrics assets
total segment assets
non-segment assets
cash and cash equivalents
short-term investments
income taxes receivable
deferred income taxes
other current assets
property, plant, and equipment
long-term investments
other assets
total assets
capital expenditures (9):
mattress fabrics
upholstery fabrics
unallocated corporate
depreciation expense
mattress fabrics
upholstery fabrics
total segment depreciation expense
2015
2014
2013
$
$
$
$
41,328
979
766
11,462
33,773 (2)
88,308
36,229
1,041
817
11,462
29,040 (3)
78,589
33,323
185
-
11,462
28,578 (4)
73,548
29,905
31,854
1,467 (5) 1,573 (6)
31,372
33,427
28,487
1,230 (7)
29,717
119,680
112,016
103,265
29,725
10,004
229
5,237
2,440
29,303
6,294
121
8,270
2,344
23,530
5,286
318
8,462
2,093
838 (8)
2,415
800
$ 171,368
763 (8)
765
1,059
160,935
786 (8)
-
966
144,706
$
$
$
$
10,454
468
252
11,174
5,034
739
5,773
4,380
827
103
5,310
4,694
618
5,312
3,805
425
227
4,457
4,487
628
5,115
(1) Current assets represent accounts receivable and inventory.
(2) The $33.8 million at May 3, 2015, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S.
of $23.8 million and located in Canada of $10.0 million.
(3) The $29.0 million at April 27, 2014, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the
U.S. of $20.6 million and located in Canada of $8.4 million.
(4) The $28.6 million at April 28, 2013, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the
U.S. of $20.4 million and located in Canada of $8.2 million.
(5) The $1.5 million at May 3, 2015, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S. of
$848 and located in China of $619.
(6) The $1.6 million at April 27, 2014, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S.
of $957, located in China of $572, and located in Poland of $44.
82
(7) The $1.2 million at April 28, 2013, represents property, plant, and equipment located in the U.S.
of $908, China of $265, and located in Poland of $57.
(8) The $838, $763, and $786 balance at May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014, and April 28, 2013, represent
property, plant, and equipment associated with unallocated corporate departments and corporate
departments shared by both the mattress and upholstery fabric segments.
(9) Capital expenditure amounts are stated on an accrual basis. See Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows for capital expenditure amounts on a cash basis.
17. STATUTORY RESERVES
The company’s subsidiaries located in China are required to transfer 10% of their net income, as
determined in accordance with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) accounting rules and regulations, to
a statutory surplus reserve fund until such reserve balance reaches 50% of the company’s registered
capital.
The transfer to this reserve must be made before distributions of any dividend to shareholders. As of May
3, 2015, the company’s statutory surplus reserve was $5.0 million, representing 10% of accumulated
earnings and profits determined in accordance with PRC accounting rules and regulations. The surplus
reserve fund is non-distributable other than during liquidation and can be used to fund previous years’
losses, if any, and may be utilized for business expansion or converted into share capital by issuing new
shares to existing shareholders in proportion to their shareholding or by increasing the par value of the
shares currently held by them provided that the remaining reserve balance after such issue is not less than
25% of the registered capital.
The company’s subsidiaries located in China can transfer funds to the parent company with the exception
of the statutory surplus reserve of $5.0 million to assist with debt repayment, capital expenditures, and
other expenses of the company’s business.
18. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
Fiscal 2013
On June 13, 2012, we announced that our board of directors approved a new authorization for us to
acquire up to $5.0 million of our common stock. This action replaced prior authorizations to acquire up to
$7.0 million of our common stock in fiscal 2012, of which $5.4 million had been used during fiscal 2012.
During fiscal 2013, we purchased 502,595 shares of common stock at a cost of $5.0 million, and
as a result, we reached the $5.0 million limit that was authorized on June 13, 2012.
On August 29, 2012, we announced that our board of directors approved a new authorization for us to
acquire up to $2.0 million of our common stock. As of April 28, 2013, there were no repurchases of
common stock on the $2.0 million limit that was authorized on August 29, 2012.
Fiscal 2014
On February 25, 2014, we announced that our board of directors approved an increase to $5.0 million in
the authorization for us to acquire our common stock, an increase from the $2.0 million authorization that
was approved by our board of directors on August 29, 2012.
During fiscal 2014, there were no repurchases of our common stock on the $5.0 million limit that was
authorized on February 25, 2014.
83
Fiscal 2015
During fiscal 2015, we purchased 43,014 shares of our common stock at a cost of $745,000, all of which
were purchased in the first and second quarters. At May 3, 2015, we had $4.3 million available for
additional repurchases of our common stock.
Under the common stock repurchase program, shares may be purchased from time to time in open market
transactions, block trades, through plans established under the Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, or
otherwise. The amount of shares purchased and the timing of such purchases will be based on working
capital requirements, market and general business conditions, and other factors including alternative
investment opportunities.
19. DIVIDEND PROGRAM
Fiscal 2013
During fiscal 2013, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $6.1 million represented a special
cash dividend payment of $0.50 per share, and $1.5 million represented our regular quarterly dividend
payments of $0.03 per share.
Fiscal 2014
During fiscal 2014, we paid quarterly dividends totaling $2.2 million that ranged from $0.04 to $0.05 per
share.
Fiscal 2015
During fiscal 2015, dividend payments totaled $7.6 million, of which $4.9 million represented a special
cash dividend payment in the first quarter of $0.40 per share, and $2.7 million represented our regularly
quarterly cash dividend payments ranging from $0.05 to $0.06 per share.
On June 18, 2015, we announced that our board of directors approved the payment of a special cash
dividend of $0.40 per share and a regular cash dividend payment of $0.06 per share. These dividend
payments are payable on July 15, 2015, to shareholders of record as of July 1, 2015.
Future dividend payments are subject to Board approval and may be adjusted at the Board’s discretion as
business needs or market conditions change.
84
SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(amounts in thousands except per share, ratios & other, stock data)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
net sales
cost of sales
gross profit
selling, general and administrative expenses
income from operations
interest expense
interest income
other expense (income)
income before income taxes
income taxes
net income
depreciation
weighted average shares outstanding
weighted average shares outstanding,
assuming dilution
PER SHARE DATA
net income per share - basic
net income per share - diluted
dividends per share
book value
BALANCE SHEET DATA
operating working capital (3)
property, plant and equipment, net
total assets
capital expenditures
dividends paid
long-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, and line of credit (1)
shareholders' equity
capital employed (2)
RATIOS & OTHER DATA
gross profit margin
operating income margin
net income margin
effective income tax rate
Debt-to-total capital employed ratio (1)
operating working capital turnover (3)
days sales in receivables
inventory turnover
STOCK DATA
stock price
high
low
close
daily average trading volume (shares)
fiscal
2015
4th quarter
fiscal
2015
3rd quarter
fiscal
2015
2nd quarter
fiscal
2015
1st quarter
fiscal
2014
4th quarter
fiscal
2014
3rd quarter
fiscal
2014
2nd quarter
fiscal
2014
1st quarter
$
$
$
$
$
$
78,846
62,674
16,172
9,605
6,567
15
(143)
10
6,685
1,772
4,913
1,528
12,219
81,269
66,867
14,402
8,375
6,027
-
(202)
307
5,922
2,110
3,812
1,432
12,219
73,991
61,713
12,278
7,379
4,899
-
(153)
162
4,890
1,889
3,001
1,414
12,218
76,060
63,345
12,715
7,419
5,296
68
(142)
(89)
5,459
2,115
3,344
1,399
12,212
74,043
62,282
11,761
7,317
4,444
97
(139)
366
4,120
1,380
2,740
1,348
12,188
72,389
60,552
11,837
7,041
4,796
91
(148)
279
4,574
(3,807)
8,381
1,329
12,188
70,589
58,354
12,235
7,200
5,035
99
(102)
224
4,814
1,718
3,096
1,331
12,183
70,141
57,067
13,074
7,100
5,974
140
(92)
391
5,535
2,305
3,230
1,305
12,148
12,440
12,417
12,401
12,404
12,413
12,405
12,389
12,366
0.40
0.39
0.06
9.77
41,829
36,078
171,368
2,490
733
2,200
119,427
79,184
20.5%
8.3
6.2
26.5
2.8
7.7
33
6.4
29.19
19.22
26.02
64.9
0.31
0.31
0.06
9.41
39,371
35,269
167,815
3,696
733
2,200
114,972
77,711
17.7%
7.4
4.7
35.6
2.8
7.5
32
7.0
22.74
18.50
20.09
26.8
0.25
0.24
0.05
9.14
37,645
33,204
156,662
2,728
611
2,200
111,674
75,636
16.6%
6.6
4.1
38.6
2.9
7.2
31
6.4
19.24
16.60
18.97
29.7
0.27
0.27
0.45
8.93
41,265
31,891
154,212
2,260
5,502
4,969
109,147
79,516
16.7%
7.0
4.4
38.7
6.2
7.1
31
6.0
19.05
17.11
17.87
33.7
0.22
0.22
0.05
9.12
41,120
31,376
160,935
2,643
612
4,986
111,744
77,394
15.9%
6.0
3.7
33.5
6.4
7.0
34
6.1
21.10
17.61
18.61
27.1
0.69
0.68
0.05
8.93
44,657
30,115
156,678
927
613
4,973
109,443
80,344
16.4%
6.6
11.6
(83.2)
6.2
7.0
31
5.4
20.75
18.37
20.05
26.9
0.25
0.25
0.04
8.29
41,210
30,559
156,242
1,082
490
4,985
101,515
77,068
17.3%
7.1
4.4
35.7
6.5
7.1
32
5.4
19.82
17.60
19.80
21.2
0.27
0.26
0.04
8.05
38,442
30,808
151,101
658
489
7,160
98,585
78,289
18.6%
8.5
4.6
41.6
9.1
7.1
29
5.6
19.56
14.93
19.36
34.7
(1)Debt includes long-term debt, current maturities of long-term debt, and line of credit.
(2) Capital employed represents long-term and current maturities of long-term debt, lines of credit, current and noncurrent
deferred income tax liabilities, current and long-term income taxes payable, stockholders' equity, offset by cash and cash equivalents,
short-term and long-term investments, current and noncurrent deferred income tax assets, and income taxes receivable.
(3) Operating working capital for this calculation is accounts receivable and inventories, offset by accounts payable-trade
accounts payable - capital expenditures.
85
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
During the three years ended May 3, 2015, there were no disagreements on any matters of accounting
principles or practices or financial statement disclosures.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of May
3, 2015. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, we have
concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed by us and submitted under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported as and when required. Further we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures have
been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed by us under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner to allow timely decisions regarding the required disclosure.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes: (1) maintaining records that in
reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of assets; (2) providing
reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of financial
statements, and that receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors; and (3) providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use, disposition of
assets that could have a material effect on financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely
basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to
provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of financial statements would be prevented or detected.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in the 2013
Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective at May 3, 2015.
Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the years ended May 3, 2015, April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013 and has
audited the company’s effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of May 3, 2015, as
stated in their report, which is included in Item 8 hereof.
During the quarter ended May 3, 2015, there were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
86
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Culp, Inc.:
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Culp, Inc. (a North Carolina corporation) and
Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 3, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of May 3, 2015, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended May 3, 2015, and our
report dated July 17, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion those financial statements.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
July 17, 2015
87
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information with respect to executive officers and directors of the company is included in the company’s
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the captions “Nominees, Directors
and Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate
Governance – Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,” “Board Committees and Attendance – Audit
Committee” which information is herein incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information with respect to executive compensation is included in the company’s definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation
14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the captions “Executive Compensation” and
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” which information is herein incorporated
by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Information with respect to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
included in the company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the
company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the
captions “Executive Compensation Plan Information” and “Voting Securities,” which information is
herein incorporated by reference.
88
The following table sets forth information as of the end of fiscal 2015 regarding shares of the our
common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of equity awards previously granted and currently
outstanding equity awards under the company’s equity incentive and stock option plans, as well as the
number of shares available for the grant of equity awards that had not been granted as of that date.
Plan Category
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
Equity compensation
plans approved by security
holders
Equity compensation
plans not approved by
security holders
Total
(a)
140,100
-
140,100
(b)
$6.49
-
$6.49
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plan
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
577,799
-
577,799
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is included in the company’s
definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the captions “Corporate
Governance – Director Independence” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” which
information is herein incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information with respect to accountants fees and services is included in the company’s definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation
14A of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the caption “Fees Paid to Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm” which information is herein incorporated by reference.
89
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
a)
DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT:
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of Culp, Inc. and its subsidiaries are filed as part of
this report.
Item
Page of Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .................................................................. 50
Consolidated Balance Sheets – May 3, 2015 and
April 27, 2014 ..................................................................................................................................... 51
Consolidated Statements of Net Income -
for the years ended May 3, 2015,
April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013 ...................................................................................................... 52
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income -
for the years ended May 3, 2015,
April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013………………………………………………………………… ... 53
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity -
for the years ended May 3, 2015,
April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013 ...................................................................................................... 54
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -
for the years ended May 3, 2015,
April 27, 2014 and April 28, 2013 ...................................................................................................... 55
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.......................................................................................... 56
2.
Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or
because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are attached at the end of this report, or incorporated by reference herein.
Management contracts, compensatory plans, and arrangements are marked with an asterisk (*).
3(i)
3(ii)
Articles of Incorporation of the company, as amended, were filed as Exhibit 3(i) to the company’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2002, filed September 11, 2002 (Commission File No.
001-12597), and are incorporated herein by reference.
Restated and Amended Bylaws of the company, as amended November 12, 2007, were filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Form 8-K dated November 12, 2007, filed on November 13, 2007
(Commission File No. 001-12597) and are incorporated herein by reference.
90
10.1
First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 2015, by and between Culp, Inc.
and Wells Fargo, N.A.
10.2
Culp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan For Certain Key Employees Amendment No. 1.
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
Written description of Non-employee Director Compensation, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 3, 2014, dated September 12, 2014, and is
incorporated herein by reference. (*)
2002 Stock Option Plan was filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 26, 2003, filed on March 12, 2003 (Commission File No. 001-12597), and is
incorporated herein by reference. (*)
Form of stock option agreement for options granted to executive officers pursuant to the 2002
Stock Option Plan. This agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended July 29, 2007, filed on September 11, 2007 (Commission File No. 001-12597) and
is incorporated herein by reference. (*)
2007 Equity Incentive Plan was filed as Annex A to the company’s 2007 Proxy Statement, filed
on August 14, 2007 (Commission File No. 001-12597), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(*)
Form of stock option agreement for options granted to non-employee directors pursuant to the
2007 Equity Incentive Plan. This agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form
10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2007, filed on December 12, 2007 (Commission File No.
001-12597) and incorporated herein by reference. (*)
Form of change in control and noncompetition agreement. This agreement was filed as Exhibit
10.3 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2007, filed on December 12,
2007 (Commission File No. 001-12597) and incorporated herein by reference. (*)
Form of stock option agreement for options granted to executive officers pursuant to the 2007
Equity Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
August 3, 2008, filed on September 10, 2008 (Commission File No. 001-12597), and incorporated
herein by reference. (*)
10.10
Note Purchase Agreement among Culp, Inc., Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and United
Omaha Insurance Company dated August 11, 2008, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Form
8-K dated August 11, 2008 (Commission File No. 001-12597), and incorporated herein by
reference.
10.11 Written description of annual incentive plan was filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the company’s Form
10-K for the year end dated April 29, 2012, filed on July 12, 2012, and is incorporated herein by
reference. (*)
10.12
10.13
10.14
Form of restricted stock unit agreement for restricted stock units granted pursuant to the 2007
Equity Incentive Plan was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter end
dated July 29, 2012, filed on September 7, 2012, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Agreement dated December 27, 2012 between Culp, Inc., Robert G. Culp, III, and Robert G. Culp,
III Irrevocable Trust dated December 11, 2012 was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K dated December 28, 2012. (*)
Credit Agreement dated as of August 13, 2013, by and between Culp, Inc. and Wells Fargo, N.A.,
was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2013, filed
on September 6, 2013, and is incorporated herein by reference.
91
10.15
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Certain Key Employees was filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2014, filed on March
7, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference. (*)
21
23
List of subsidiaries of the company
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in connection with the registration
statements of Culp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-13310, 33-37027, 33-80206, 33-62843,
333-27519, 333-59512, 333-59514, 333-101805, 333-147663), dated March 20, 1987, September
18, 1990, June 13, 1994, September 22, 1995, May 21, 1997, April 26, 2001, April 25, 2001,
December 12, 2002, and November 27, 2007 and on Form S-3 and S-3/A (File No. 333-141346).
24(a)
Power of Attorney of Patrick B. Flavin, dated July 17, 2015
24(b)
Power of Attorney of Kenneth R. Larson, dated July 17, 2015
24(c)
Power of Attorney of Kenneth W. McAllister, dated July17, 2015
31(a)
31(b)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
32(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32(b)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
b)
Exhibits:
The exhibits to this Form 10-K are filed at the end of this Form 10-K immediately preceded by an index. A
list of the exhibits begins on page 93 under the subheading “Exhibit Index.”
c)
Financial Statement Schedules:
None
92
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CULP, INC. has
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 17th day
of July 2015.
CULP, INC.
By /s/ Franklin N. Saxon
Franklin N. Saxon
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 17th day of July
2015.
/s/
/s/
/s/
/s/
Robert G. Culp, III
Robert G. Culp, III
(Chairman of the Board of Directors)
/s/ Kenneth R. Larson *
Kenneth R. Larson
(Director)
Franklin N. Saxon
Franklin N. Saxon
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
(Director)
Patrick B. Flavin*
Patrick B. Flavin
(Director)
Kenneth W. McAllister*
Kenneth W. McAllister
(Director)
/s/ Kenneth R. Bowling
Kenneth R. Bowling
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
/s/ Thomas B. Gallagher, Jr.
Thomas B. Gallagher, Jr.
Corporate Controller
(principal accounting officer)
* By Kenneth R. Bowling, Attorney-in-Fact, pursuant to Powers of Attorney filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
93
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number
Exhibit
10.1
10.2
21
23
24(a)
24(b)
24(c)
31(a)
31(b)
32(a)
32(b)
First Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 2015, by and
between Culp, Inc. and Wells Fargo, N.A.
Culp, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan For Certain Key Employees
Amendment No. 1
List of subsidiaries of the company
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in connection
with the registration statements of Culp, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-
13310, 33-37027, 33-80206, 33-62843, 333-27519, 333-59512, 333-59514,
333-101805, 333-147663), dated March 20, 1987, September 18, 1990, June
13, 1994, September 22, 1995, May 21, 1997, April 26, 2001, April 25, 2001,
December 12, 2002, and November 27, 2007 and on Form S-3 and S-3/A
(File No. 333-141346).
Power of Attorney of Patrick B. Flavin, dated July 17, 2015
Power of Attorney of Kenneth R. Larson, dated July 17, 2015
Power of Attorney of Kenneth W. McAllister, dated July 17, 2015
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
94
EXHIBIT 10.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of July
10, 2015 by and between CULP, INC., a North Carolina corporation ("Borrower"), and WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that
certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of August 13, 2013, as amended from
time to time ("Credit Agreement").
WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set
forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.
Amendments to Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement is hereby amended as set
forth in this Section 1.
1.1
Agreement:
The following amendments are hereby made to Article I (“Definitions”) of the Credit
(a)
The definition of “Applicable Margin” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows:
“(a) “Applicable Margin” shall be shall be 1.50% until the first Rate Determination Date
(hereafter defined) after August 1, 2015, and as of and after such first Rate Determination Date
after August 1, 2015 shall be determined based on the pricing grid set forth below and tied to
the Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated EBITDA ratio determined as set forth in Section
5.9(b):
Price
Level
Consolidated Total Debt
to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio
Applicable Margin
I
II
III
IV
Less than 0.50 to 1.00
1.50%
Greater than or equal to 0.50
to 1.00 but less than 1.25 to
1.00
Greater than or equal to 1.25
to 1.00 but less than 2.00 to
1.00
Greater than or equal to 2.00
to 1.00 but less than or equal
to 2.25 to 1.00
1.90%
2.35%
2.75%
The Applicable Margin shall be determined effective as of the date (herein, the “Rate
Determination Date”) which is 10 days after receipt by the Bank of the annual (in the case of
the fourth Fiscal Quarter) and quarterly financial statements of the Borrower pursuant to
the provisions of Section 5.3 for the Fiscal Quarter as of the end of which the foregoing ratio
is being determined, based on such quarterly or annual financial statements, as the case
may be, for the Fiscal Quarter then ended, and the Applicable Margin so determined shall
remain effective from such Rate Determination Date until the date which is 10 days after
receipt by the Bank of the financial statements for the next Fiscal Quarter (which latter date
shall be a new Rate Determination Date); provided that if the Borrower shall have failed to
deliver to the Bank the financial statements required to be delivered pursuant to the
provisions of Section 5.3 with respect to the Fiscal Quarter most recently ended within the
time period specified herein, then for the period beginning on the day which is 10 days after
the required delivery date of such financial statements and ending on the earlier of (A) 10
days after the date on which the Borrower shall deliver to the Bank the financial statements
to be delivered pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.3 with respect to such Fiscal Quarter
or any subsequent Fiscal Quarter, or (B) 10 days after the date on which the Borrower shall
deliver to the Bank annual financial statements required to be delivered pursuant to the
provisions of Section 5.3(a) with respect to the Fiscal Year which includes such Fiscal Quarter
or any subsequent Fiscal Year, the Applicable Margin shall be determined at Pricing Level IV
set forth above. Any change in the Applicable Margin as of any Rate Determination Date
shall result in a corresponding change, effective on and as of such Rate Determination Date,
in the interest rate applicable to the Loans outstanding on such Rate Determination Date.”
(b)
The definition of “Culp Europe Credit Agreement” is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety to read as follows:
“(n)
“Culp Europe Credit Agreement” means the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement (Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Facility) dated as of January 31, 2014 by and
between Culp Europe and Bank providing for a revolving line of credit in the original principal
amount of up to One Million Five Hundred Thousand Euros (€1,500,000.00) or the equivalent in
Alternative Currency, as defined therein, as the same may be amended from time to time.”
1.2
Section 2.1(a) of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting "August 31,
2015" as the last day on which Bank will make advances under the Line of Credit, and by substituting for
said date "August 31, 2017."
1.3
Section 5.9 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to
read as follows:
“SECTION 5.9. FINANCIAL CONDITION. Maintain Borrower’s financial condition as
follows using generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied and used
consistently with prior practices (except to the extent modified by the definitions herein):
(a) Tangible Net Worth. Tangible Net Worth not less than $75,000,000.00 for each
completed Fiscal Quarter, with “Tangible Net Worth” defined as shareholder’s equity
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently
applied, less intangible assets.
(b)
Consolidated Total Debt/Consolidated EBITDA Ratio. Ratio of
Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated EBITDA not greater than 2.25 to 1.00 as of each
Fiscal Quarter end, determined on a rolling 4-quarter basis, commencing with the Fiscal
Quarter ending on or about August 2, 2015.
The term “Consolidated Total Debt” as used in this Section 5.9(b) shall have the
definition given such term in the Omaha Note Purchase Agreement (but excluding for
purposes of this Section 5.9(b) any future amendments thereto not made with the
written consent of Bank), which definition shall survive for purposes of this Agreement
notwithstanding the termination of the Omaha Note Purchase Agreement or the
repayment full of the Borrower’s obligations thereunder.
(c)
Consolidated EBITDAR/Consolidated Fixed Charges. Ratio of
Consolidated EBITDAR to Consolidated Fixed Charges not less than 2.00 to 1.00 as of each
Fiscal Quarter end, determined on a rolling 4-quarter basis, commencing with the Fiscal
Quarter ending on or about August 2, 2015.
The terms “Consolidated EBITDAR” and “Consolidated Fixed Charges” as used in this
Section 5.9(c) shall have the definitions given such terms in the Omaha Note Purchase
Agreement (but excluding for purposes of this Section 5.9(c) any future amendments
thereto not made with the written consent of Bank), which definitions shall survive for
purposes of this Agreement notwithstanding the termination of the Omaha Note
Purchase Agreement or the repayment full of the Borrower’s obligations thereunder.”
1.4.
Section 6.2 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the reference to
“$10,000,000.00” and substituting in lieu thereof “$12,000,000.00.”
1.5.
The Compliance Checklist attached to the Form of Compliance Certificate attached at
Exhibit A to the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced by the Compliance Checklist attached
as Exhibit A to this Amendment.
2.
Conditions to Effectiveness. The effectiveness of this Amendment is subject to the
fulfillment to Bank’s satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a)
Documentation. Bank shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to Bank,
each of the following, duly executed:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
This Amendment;
A First Modification to Revolving Line of Credit Note; and
Such other documentation as Bank may reasonably require in connection with
this Amendment.
Financial Condition. There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined
by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as
determined by Bank, in the market value of any substantial or material portion of the
assets of Borrower.
Amendment Fee. In consideration of the changes set forth herein and as a condition to
the effectiveness hereof, immediately upon signing this Amendment Borrower shall pay
to Bank a non-refundable fee of $40,000.00.
(b)
(c)
3.
No Further Amendment. Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions
of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms
defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This
Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document.
4.
Representations and Warranties. Borrower hereby remakes all representations and
warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower
further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the
Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time
or both would constitute any such Event of Default.
5.
Costs. Borrower agrees to pay all costs and expenses of the Bank in connection with the
preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment, including without limitation the fees and
expenses of the Bank’s legal counsel.
6.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which when taken
together shall constitute one and the same document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed, with
the intention that it constitute an instrument under seal, as of the day and year first written above.
CULP, INC.
WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Kenneth R. Bowling
By: /s/ Timothy Sechrest
Name: Kenneth R. Bowling
Name: Timothy Sechrest
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Title: Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 10.2
CULP, INC.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CERTAIN KEY EMPLOYEES
AMENDMENT NO. 1
WHEREAS, Culp, Inc. (hereinafter “Employer”) adopted the Culp, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan for Certain Key Employees (hereinafter “Plan”) for a select group of
management or highly compensated employees on December 16, 2013;
WHEREAS, the Plan provides for monthly installments as a distribution option within a
Participant’s Retirement sub-account; and
WHEREAS, the Plan provides that distributions will only be made in the form of cash;
and
WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan language to limit the Employer
share distribution methodologies within a Participant’s Retirement sub-account and provide the
Employer with the ability to make distributions from the Plan if the form of cash or Employer
shares, as appropriate; and
WHEREAS, Article 10, Section 10.9, Amendment or Modification, of the Plan
document provides Employer with the authority to amend and modify the Plan subject to certain
non-applicable restrictions.
NOW THEREFORE, the Employer hereby amends the Plan document effective
immediately as follows:
Section 6.3, Distribution upon Retirement, is hereby revised to read as follows:
“6.3 Distributions upon Retirement
If the Participant has a Separation from Service due to Retirement, the Participant’s
Retirement sub-account(s) shall be distributed as soon as administratively feasible but no
later than sixty (60) days following the Participant’s Retirement, subject to Section 6.11
(Distributions to Specified Employees).
Non Employer Share(s) distribution shall be made either in a lump-sum payment or in
substantially equal annual, quarterly or monthly installments, as defined in Section 6.4
below, over a period of up to ten (10) years as elected by the Participant. Distribution(s) of
Employer Share(s) from a Participant’s Retirement sub-account(s) shall be made either in a
lump-sum payment or in annual or quarterly installments, as defined in Section 6.4 below,
over the period of time elected by the Participant for the applicable Retirement sub-
account(s). If the Participant fails to designate the form of the distribution, the sub-account
shall be paid in a lump-sum payment. If a Participant has any In-Service sub-accounts at the
time of his or her Retirement, said sub-accounts shall be distributed in a lump sum as soon as
administratively feasible but no later than sixty (60) days following Participant’s Retirement,
subject to Section 6.11 (Distributions to Specified Employees). For purposes of this Plan,
Share(s) shall mean a share of the Employer’s common stock, $0.05 par value.”
Section 6.13, Form of Payment, is hereby revised to read as follows:
“6.13 Form of Payment
All distribution shall be made in the form of cash or Employer Share(s), as
determined to be appropriate by the Employer in their sole and absolute discretion. For
purposes of this Plan, Share(s) shall mean a share of the Employer’s common stock, $0.05
par value.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Culp, Inc. has executed this Amendment on this
the 15th day of July 2015.
Culp, Inc.
/s/ Franklin N. Saxon
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CULP, INC.
Name of Subsidiary
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Culp Fabrics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Culp Cut and Sew Co., Ltd.
Culp International Holdings Ltd.
Rayonese Textile Inc.
Culp Europe
People’s Republic of China
People’s Republic of China
Cayman Islands
Canada
Poland
EXHIBIT 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have issued our reports dated July 17, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Culp, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended May 3, 2015. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statements of Culp, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-59512, File No. 333-59514, File No.
333-27519, File No. 333-101805, File No. 33-13310, File No. 33-37027, File No. 33-80206, File No. 33-
62843, and File No. 333-147663), and on Form S-3 and Form S-3/A (File No. 333-141346).
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
July 17, 2015
Exhibit 24(a)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of CULP, INC., a
North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH R. BOWLING the true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned, as a director of the Corporation, the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 3, 2015 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and to sign any amendment or amendments to such Annual Report, hereby
ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.
/s/
Patrick B. Flavin
Patrick B. Flavin
Date: July 17, 2015
Exhibit 24(b)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of CULP, INC., a
North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH R. BOWLING the true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned as a director of the Corporation the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 3, 2015 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and to sign any amendment or amendments to such Annual Report, hereby
ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.
/s/
Kenneth R. Larson
Kenneth R. Larson
Date: July 17, 2015
Exhibit 24(c)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of CULP, INC., a
North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH R. BOWLING the true and
lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned as a director of the Corporation the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 3, 2015 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and to sign any amendment or amendments to such Annual Report, hereby
ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.
/s/
Kenneth W. McAllister
Kenneth W. McAllister
Date: July 17, 2015
Exhibit 31(a)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Franklin N. Saxon, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Culp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Franklin N. Saxon
Franklin N. Saxon
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 17, 2015
Exhibit 31(b)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Kenneth R. Bowling, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Culp, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Kenneth R. Bowling
Kenneth R. Bowling
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: July 17, 2015
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32(a)
In connection with the Annual Report of Culp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended May 3, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Franklin N. Saxon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Franklin N. Saxon
Franklin N. Saxon
Chief Executive Officer
July 17, 2015
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Culp, Inc. and
will be retained by Culp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32(b)
In connection with the Annual Report of Culp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended May 3, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Kenneth R. Bowling, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ Kenneth R. Bowling
Kenneth R. Bowling
Chief Financial Officer
July 17, 2015
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Culp, Inc. and
will be retained by Culp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
4
1
0
2
,
2
r
e
b
m
e
v
o
N
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
5
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
r
b
e
F
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
5
1
0
2
,
3
y
a
M
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
S
E
L
B
A
T
N
O
I
T
A
I
L
I
C
N
O
C
E
R
T
N
E
M
G
E
S
Y
B
D
E
Y
O
L
P
M
E
L
A
T
I
P
A
C
N
O
N
R
U
T
E
R
.
C
N
I
,
P
L
U
C
)
d
e
t
i
d
u
a
n
U
(
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
i
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
(
5
1
0
2
,
3
Y
A
M
D
E
D
N
E
S
H
T
N
O
M
E
V
L
E
W
T
E
H
T
R
O
F
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
.
g
v
A
)
3
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
%
5
.
3
3
%
7
.
8
4
A
/
N
%
3
.
9
2
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
)
1
(
5
1
0
2
,
3
y
a
M
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
m
o
c
n
I
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
v
l
e
w
T
d
e
d
n
E
3
8
7
,
4
6
0
8
6
,
6
1
)
5
7
5
,
3
(
8
8
8
,
7
7
$
$
8
2
1
,
8
1
7
6
,
1
2
)
0
1
0
,
7
(
9
8
7
,
2
2
$
$
)
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
:
s
s
e
l
(
l
a
t
o
T
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
)
8
8
9
,
4
4
(
2
6
6
,
6
5
1
4
7
6
,
1
1
1
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
5
2
6
,
5
4
)
4
9
8
,
2
1
(
1
3
7
,
2
3
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
6
1
9
,
0
3
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
)
7
4
8
,
4
1
(
9
6
0
,
6
1
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
1
2
1
,
0
8
)
7
4
2
,
7
1
(
4
7
8
,
2
6
$
$
)
3
4
8
,
2
5
(
5
1
8
,
7
6
1
2
7
9
,
4
1
1
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
6
0
4
,
8
4
)
6
4
4
,
5
1
(
0
6
9
,
2
3
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
1
6
7
,
5
3
)
7
2
9
,
8
1
(
4
3
8
,
6
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
8
4
6
,
3
8
)
0
7
4
,
8
1
(
8
7
1
,
5
6
$
$
)
1
4
9
,
1
5
(
8
6
3
,
1
7
1
$
7
2
4
,
9
1
1
$
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
4
6
4
,
9
4
)
5
3
5
,
4
1
(
9
2
9
,
4
3
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
8
3
8
,
2
3
)
2
1
8
,
8
1
(
6
2
0
,
4
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
6
6
0
,
9
8
)
4
9
5
,
8
1
(
2
7
4
,
0
7
$
$
)
8
1
3
,
6
(
)
1
1
9
,
1
(
)
3
5
9
,
8
2
(
–
)
8
0
5
(
)
1
9
1
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
8
6
2
0
8
9
,
3
5
9
3
,
1
–
)
8
1
3
,
6
(
)
1
1
9
,
1
(
)
3
5
9
,
8
2
(
–
)
8
0
5
(
)
1
9
1
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
8
6
2
0
8
9
,
3
5
9
3
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
4
8
3
,
8
(
)
3
6
0
,
2
(
)
4
0
1
(
)
2
8
4
(
)
5
9
9
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
–
5
2
3
0
3
6
,
3
4
8
3
,
3
)
4
8
3
,
8
(
)
3
6
0
,
2
(
)
4
0
1
(
)
2
8
4
(
)
5
9
9
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
5
2
3
0
3
6
,
3
4
8
3
,
3
–
)
2
7
7
,
8
2
(
)
2
7
7
,
8
2
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
5
2
7
,
9
2
(
)
4
0
0
,
0
1
(
)
5
1
4
,
2
(
)
9
2
2
(
)
7
4
4
(
)
0
9
7
,
4
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
5
2
3
2
9
7
,
3
0
5
0
,
1
–
)
5
2
7
,
9
2
(
)
4
0
0
,
0
1
(
)
5
1
4
,
2
(
)
9
2
2
(
)
7
4
4
(
)
0
9
7
,
4
(
0
0
2
,
2
–
5
2
3
2
9
7
,
3
0
5
0
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
3
6
,
5
7
$
)
7
0
3
,
3
(
$
9
6
0
,
6
1
$
4
7
8
,
2
6
$
1
1
7
,
7
7
$
)
1
0
3
,
4
(
$
4
3
8
,
6
1
$
8
7
1
,
5
6
$
4
8
1
,
9
7
$
)
4
1
3
,
5
(
$
6
2
0
,
4
1
$
2
7
4
,
0
7
$
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
4
1
0
2
,
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
5
3
9
,
0
6
1
)
1
9
1
,
9
4
(
4
4
7
,
1
1
1
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
3
9
8
,
6
4
)
5
2
0
,
5
1
(
8
6
8
,
1
3
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
7
8
9
,
4
3
)
8
6
5
,
7
1
(
9
1
4
,
7
1
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
5
5
0
,
9
7
)
8
9
5
,
6
1
(
7
5
4
,
2
6
$
$
2
1
2
,
4
5
1
$
)
5
6
0
,
5
4
(
7
4
1
,
9
0
1
$
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
2
9
2
,
2
4
)
3
3
1
,
5
1
(
9
5
1
,
7
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
0
2
5
,
0
3
)
8
6
4
,
1
1
(
2
5
0
,
9
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
0
0
4
,
1
8
)
4
6
4
,
8
1
(
6
3
9
,
2
6
$
$
)
4
9
2
,
6
(
)
3
0
3
,
9
2
(
)
5
6
7
(
)
1
2
1
(
)
0
3
2
,
6
(
)
0
4
0
,
2
(
0
0
2
,
2
6
8
5
2
4
4
2
6
9
,
3
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
)
4
9
2
,
6
(
)
3
0
3
,
9
2
(
)
5
6
7
(
)
1
2
1
(
)
0
3
2
,
6
(
)
0
4
0
,
2
(
0
0
2
,
2
6
8
5
2
4
4
2
6
9
,
3
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
1
1
3
,
6
(
)
9
4
7
,
1
(
)
6
3
1
(
)
3
7
9
(
)
3
0
2
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
)
5
6
6
,
4
2
(
9
6
5
7
8
3
7
3
0
,
4
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
)
1
1
3
,
6
(
)
9
4
7
,
1
(
)
6
3
1
(
)
3
7
9
(
)
3
0
2
,
6
(
0
0
2
,
2
)
5
6
6
,
4
2
(
9
6
5
7
8
3
7
3
0
,
4
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4
9
3
,
7
7
$
)
2
8
4
,
2
(
$
9
1
4
,
7
1
$
7
5
4
,
2
6
$
6
1
5
,
9
7
$
)
2
7
4
,
2
(
$
2
5
0
,
9
1
$
6
3
9
,
2
6
$
l
a
t
o
T
8
8
8
,
7
7
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
)
5
7
5
,
3
(
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
0
8
6
,
6
1
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
3
8
7
,
4
6
$
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
:
s
e
t
o
N
,
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
s
,
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
c
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
l
t
o
n
s
e
o
d
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
.
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
y
b
d
e
d
i
v
i
d
5
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
r
o
f
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
e
r
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
.
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
n
a
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
,
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
x
a
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
n
o
n
d
n
a
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
,
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
l
,
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
g
n
d
u
l
c
n
i
i
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
,
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
.
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
n
a
,
4
1
0
2
,
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
,
4
1
0
2
,
2
r
e
b
m
e
v
o
N
,
5
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
r
b
e
F
i
,
5
1
0
2
,
3
y
a
M
g
n
d
n
e
s
d
o
i
r
e
p
e
v
i
f
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
d
e
t
u
p
m
o
c
l
s
a
w
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
.
K
-
0
1
m
r
o
F
5
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
e
h
t
i
i
f
o
0
8
e
g
a
p
n
o
g
n
n
n
g
e
b
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
C
o
t
s
e
t
o
N
e
h
t
f
o
6
1
e
t
o
N
e
e
S
)
1
(
)
2
(
)
3
(
3
1
0
2
,
7
2
r
e
b
o
t
c
O
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
4
1
0
2
,
6
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
T
N
E
M
G
E
S
Y
B
D
E
Y
O
L
P
M
E
L
A
T
I
P
A
C
N
O
N
R
U
T
E
R
.
C
N
I
,
P
L
U
C
)
d
e
t
i
d
u
a
n
U
(
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
i
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
(
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
L
I
R
P
A
D
E
D
N
E
S
H
T
N
O
M
E
V
L
E
W
T
E
H
T
R
O
F
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
.
g
v
A
)
3
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
%
3
.
9
2
%
7
.
0
4
A
/
N
%
2
.
6
2
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
)
1
(
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
l
i
r
p
A
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
m
o
c
n
I
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
v
l
e
w
T
d
e
d
n
E
8
2
7
,
9
5
0
6
7
,
9
1
)
9
2
3
,
2
(
9
5
1
,
7
7
$
$
6
3
0
,
8
5
1
5
,
7
1
)
2
0
3
,
5
(
9
4
2
,
0
2
$
$
)
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
:
s
s
e
l
(
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
l
a
t
o
T
2
4
2
,
6
5
1
)
7
2
7
,
4
5
(
5
1
5
,
1
0
1
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
7
1
9
,
0
4
)
6
4
6
,
8
1
(
1
7
2
,
2
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
1
8
8
,
5
3
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
)
1
8
5
,
5
1
(
0
0
3
,
0
2
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
4
4
4
,
9
7
)
0
0
5
,
0
2
(
4
4
9
,
8
5
$
$
l
a
t
o
T
8
7
6
,
6
5
1
$
)
5
3
2
,
7
4
(
3
4
4
,
9
0
1
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
8
2
0
,
1
4
)
2
4
8
,
4
1
(
6
8
1
,
6
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
7
4
1
,
7
3
)
9
8
5
,
3
1
(
8
5
5
,
3
2
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
3
0
5
,
8
7
)
4
0
8
,
8
1
(
9
9
6
,
9
5
$
$
5
3
9
,
0
6
1
$
)
1
9
1
,
9
4
(
4
4
7
,
1
1
1
$
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
3
9
8
,
6
4
)
5
2
0
,
5
1
(
8
6
8
,
1
3
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
7
8
9
,
4
3
$
)
8
6
5
,
7
1
(
9
1
4
,
7
1
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
5
5
0
,
9
7
)
8
9
5
,
6
1
(
7
5
4
,
2
6
$
$
)
0
2
2
,
6
(
)
7
6
2
,
4
2
(
–
–
)
1
6
6
(
)
5
4
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
5
8
5
4
0
3
1
4
1
,
4
6
1
0
,
5
0
0
2
,
2
)
0
2
2
,
6
(
)
7
6
2
,
4
2
(
–
–
)
1
6
6
(
)
5
4
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
5
8
5
4
0
3
1
4
1
,
4
6
1
0
,
5
0
0
2
,
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
6
0
,
7
7
$
)
6
7
1
,
2
(
$
0
0
3
,
0
2
$
4
4
9
,
8
5
$
)
7
7
0
,
7
(
)
3
9
2
,
3
2
(
–
–
)
3
0
5
,
7
(
)
7
2
2
,
1
(
0
0
2
,
2
3
7
5
0
3
1
5
4
9
3
5
9
,
3
0
0
2
,
2
4
4
3
,
0
8
$
)
7
7
0
,
7
(
)
3
9
2
,
3
2
(
–
–
)
3
0
5
,
7
(
)
7
2
2
,
1
(
0
0
2
,
2
3
7
5
0
3
1
5
4
9
3
5
9
,
3
0
0
2
,
2
)
3
1
9
,
2
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
4
9
2
,
6
(
)
3
0
3
,
9
2
(
)
5
6
7
(
)
1
2
1
(
)
0
3
2
,
6
(
)
0
4
0
,
2
(
0
0
2
,
2
6
8
5
2
4
4
2
6
9
,
3
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
)
4
9
2
,
6
(
)
3
0
3
,
9
2
(
)
5
6
7
(
)
1
2
1
(
)
0
3
2
,
6
(
)
0
4
0
,
2
(
0
0
2
,
2
6
8
5
2
4
4
2
6
9
,
3
3
1
0
,
1
0
0
2
,
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
8
5
5
,
3
2
$
9
9
6
,
9
5
$
4
9
3
,
7
7
$
)
2
8
4
,
2
(
$
9
1
4
,
7
1
$
7
5
4
,
2
6
$
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
y
l
u
J
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
)
3
2
1
,
9
4
(
6
0
7
,
4
4
1
3
8
5
,
5
9
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
7
5
7
,
9
3
)
7
3
4
,
9
1
(
0
2
3
,
0
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
5
9
9
,
0
3
)
2
8
6
,
3
1
(
3
1
3
,
7
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
4
5
9
,
3
7
)
4
0
0
,
6
1
(
0
5
9
,
7
5
$
$
1
0
1
,
1
5
1
$
)
6
1
5
,
2
5
(
5
8
5
,
8
9
$
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
3
0
5
,
8
3
)
7
1
7
,
9
1
(
6
8
7
,
8
1
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
1
8
3
,
4
3
)
2
7
1
,
4
1
(
9
0
2
,
0
2
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
7
1
2
,
8
7
)
7
2
6
,
8
1
(
0
9
5
,
9
5
$
$
)
6
8
2
,
5
(
)
0
3
5
,
3
2
(
)
8
1
3
(
)
3
5
7
(
)
9
0
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
1
6
5
5
8
2
1
9
1
,
4
5
7
0
,
3
0
0
4
,
4
)
6
8
2
,
5
(
)
0
3
5
,
3
2
(
)
8
1
3
(
)
3
5
7
(
)
9
0
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
1
6
5
5
8
2
1
9
1
,
4
5
7
0
,
3
0
0
4
,
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
4
7
1
,
6
(
)
3
2
4
,
1
2
(
)
2
9
2
(
)
1
5
6
(
)
7
4
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
0
6
5
0
2
3
6
7
1
,
4
5
3
3
,
4
0
0
4
,
4
)
4
7
1
,
6
(
)
3
2
4
,
1
2
(
)
2
9
2
(
)
1
5
6
(
)
7
4
7
,
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
0
6
5
0
2
3
6
7
1
,
4
5
3
3
,
4
0
0
4
,
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
9
6
,
2
7
$
)
4
6
5
,
2
(
$
3
1
3
,
7
1
$
0
5
9
,
7
5
$
9
8
2
,
8
7
$
)
0
1
5
,
1
(
$
9
0
2
,
0
2
$
0
9
5
,
9
5
$
l
a
t
o
T
9
5
1
,
7
7
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
)
9
2
3
,
2
(
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
0
6
7
,
9
1
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
8
2
7
,
9
5
$
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
:
s
e
t
o
N
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
,
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
s
,
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
c
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
l
t
o
n
s
e
o
d
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
.
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
y
b
d
e
d
i
v
i
d
4
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
r
o
f
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
e
r
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
.
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
n
a
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
,
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
x
a
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
n
o
n
d
n
a
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
,
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
l
,
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
g
n
d
u
l
c
n
i
i
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
,
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
.
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
n
a
,
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
y
l
u
J
,
3
1
0
2
,
7
2
r
e
b
o
t
c
O
,
4
1
0
2
,
6
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
,
4
1
0
2
,
7
2
i
l
i
r
p
A
g
n
d
n
e
s
d
o
i
r
e
p
e
v
i
f
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
d
e
t
u
p
m
o
c
l
s
a
w
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
.
K
-
0
1
m
r
o
F
5
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
e
h
t
i
i
f
o
0
8
e
g
a
p
n
o
g
n
n
n
g
e
b
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
C
o
t
s
e
t
o
N
e
h
t
f
o
6
1
e
t
o
N
e
e
S
)
1
(
)
2
(
)
3
(
)
5
5
0
,
7
4
(
3
4
4
,
2
4
1
8
8
3
,
5
9
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
1
6
8
,
0
4
)
3
0
3
,
7
1
(
8
5
5
,
3
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
0
4
2
,
7
2
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
)
2
1
5
,
0
1
(
8
2
7
,
6
1
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
2
4
3
,
4
7
)
0
4
2
,
9
1
(
2
0
1
,
5
5
$
$
)
1
3
8
,
1
5
(
7
9
7
,
3
4
1
6
6
9
,
1
9
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
0
3
2
,
5
3
)
8
0
7
,
7
1
(
2
2
5
,
7
1
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
3
7
7
,
3
3
)
9
9
2
,
5
1
(
4
7
4
,
8
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
4
9
7
,
4
7
)
4
2
8
,
8
1
(
0
7
9
,
5
5
$
$
6
0
7
,
4
4
1
$
)
3
2
1
,
9
4
(
3
8
5
,
5
9
$
l
a
t
o
T
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
7
5
7
,
9
3
)
7
3
4
,
9
1
(
0
2
3
,
0
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
5
9
9
,
0
3
)
2
8
6
,
3
1
(
3
1
3
,
7
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
4
5
9
,
3
7
)
4
0
0
,
6
1
(
0
5
9
,
7
5
$
$
)
1
4
2
,
5
(
)
0
7
4
,
4
(
)
4
6
4
,
3
2
(
-
)
8
3
7
,
4
(
1
0
4
,
2
5
7
8
5
8
3
6
5
8
8
8
1
,
4
6
1
4
,
4
6
9
5
,
0
7
$
)
1
4
2
,
5
(
)
0
7
4
,
4
(
)
4
6
4
,
3
2
(
-
)
8
3
7
,
4
(
1
0
4
,
2
5
7
8
5
8
3
6
5
8
8
8
1
,
4
6
1
4
,
4
)
4
3
2
,
1
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
8
2
7
,
6
1
$
2
0
1
,
5
5
$
)
7
3
2
,
5
(
)
8
9
0
,
4
(
)
9
8
4
,
9
1
(
–
)
2
7
1
,
4
(
6
6
3
,
2
6
7
5
5
9
3
6
5
8
5
9
1
,
4
0
0
4
,
4
8
5
7
,
1
7
$
)
7
3
2
,
5
(
)
8
9
0
,
4
(
)
9
8
4
,
9
1
(
–
)
2
7
1
,
4
(
6
6
3
,
2
6
7
5
5
9
3
6
5
8
5
9
1
,
4
0
0
4
,
4
)
6
8
6
,
2
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
6
8
2
,
5
(
)
9
0
7
,
7
(
)
0
3
5
,
3
2
(
)
8
1
3
(
)
3
5
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
1
6
5
5
8
2
1
9
1
,
4
5
7
0
,
3
0
0
4
,
4
)
6
8
2
,
5
(
)
9
0
7
,
7
(
)
0
3
5
,
3
2
(
)
8
1
3
(
)
3
5
7
(
0
0
2
,
2
1
6
5
5
8
2
1
9
1
,
4
5
7
0
,
3
0
0
4
,
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
4
7
4
,
8
1
$
0
7
9
,
5
5
$
9
9
6
,
2
7
$
)
4
6
5
,
2
(
$
3
1
3
,
7
1
$
0
5
9
,
7
5
$
2
1
0
2
,
9
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
2
1
0
2
,
9
2
y
l
u
J
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
2
1
0
2
,
8
2
r
e
b
o
t
c
O
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
3
1
0
2
,
7
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
e
d
n
E
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
e
r
h
t
e
h
t
f
o
s
A
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
T
N
E
M
G
E
S
Y
B
D
E
Y
O
L
P
M
E
L
A
T
I
P
A
C
N
O
N
R
U
T
E
R
.
C
N
I
,
P
L
U
C
)
d
e
t
i
d
u
a
n
U
(
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
T
n
i
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
(
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
L
I
R
P
A
D
E
D
N
E
S
H
T
N
O
M
E
V
L
E
W
T
E
H
T
R
O
F
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
.
g
v
A
)
3
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
%
6
.
5
3
%
4
.
0
4
A
/
N
%
4
.
9
2
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
)
1
(
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
l
i
r
p
A
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
m
o
c
n
I
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
O
s
h
t
n
o
M
e
v
l
e
w
T
d
e
d
n
E
7
4
9
,
5
5
0
0
2
,
7
1
)
4
2
5
,
1
(
3
2
6
,
1
7
$
$
3
5
9
,
6
0
0
9
,
9
1
)
8
6
7
,
5
(
5
8
0
,
1
2
$
$
)
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
:
s
s
e
l
(
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
l
a
t
o
T
)
6
1
7
,
5
5
(
6
1
7
,
4
4
1
0
0
0
,
9
8
l
a
t
o
T
$
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
2
1
5
,
9
3
)
0
4
9
,
8
1
(
2
7
5
,
0
2
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
1
4
6
,
3
3
)
3
2
1
,
9
1
(
8
1
5
,
4
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
3
6
5
,
1
7
)
3
5
6
,
7
1
(
0
1
9
,
3
5
$
$
)
1
4
9
,
5
(
)
7
6
4
,
2
(
)
5
0
2
,
3
(
4
0
4
,
2
)
3
2
0
,
5
2
(
9
8
8
2
4
6
5
0
7
4
6
1
,
4
9
1
7
,
6
7
8
8
,
7
6
$
)
1
4
9
,
5
(
)
7
6
4
,
2
(
)
5
0
2
,
3
(
4
0
4
,
2
)
3
2
0
,
5
2
(
9
8
8
2
4
6
5
0
7
4
6
1
,
4
)
1
4
5
(
9
1
7
,
6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
8
1
5
,
4
1
$
0
1
9
,
3
5
$
0
6
1
,
3
4
1
$
)
9
2
3
,
1
5
(
1
3
8
,
1
9
$
l
a
t
o
T
)
0
0
2
,
5
(
)
7
3
3
,
2
(
)
5
1
7
,
2
(
0
0
4
,
2
)
9
8
8
,
1
2
(
4
3
8
1
5
7
5
0
7
1
3
1
,
4
6
6
6
,
6
7
7
1
,
5
7
$
l
a
t
o
T
3
2
6
,
1
7
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
9
8
0
,
5
3
)
8
2
0
,
9
1
(
1
6
0
,
6
1
$
$
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
3
7
9
,
9
2
)
6
0
0
,
1
1
(
7
6
9
,
8
1
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
$
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
8
9
0
,
8
7
)
5
9
2
,
1
2
(
3
0
8
,
6
5
$
$
)
0
0
2
,
5
(
)
7
3
3
,
2
(
)
5
1
7
,
2
(
0
0
4
,
2
)
9
8
8
,
1
2
(
4
3
8
1
5
7
5
0
7
1
3
1
,
4
6
6
6
,
6
)
3
9
5
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
$
7
6
9
,
8
1
$
3
0
8
,
6
5
$
d
e
t
a
c
o
l
l
a
n
U
e
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
)
4
2
5
,
1
(
$
.
K
-
0
1
m
r
o
F
5
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
e
h
t
y
r
e
t
s
l
o
h
p
U
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
0
0
2
,
7
1
$
s
s
e
r
t
t
a
M
s
c
i
r
b
a
F
7
4
9
,
5
5
$
.
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
n
a
,
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
,
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
x
a
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
n
o
n
d
n
a
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
,
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
l
,
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
g
n
d
u
l
c
n
i
i
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
,
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
s
,
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
c
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
l
t
o
n
s
e
o
d
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
.
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
y
b
d
e
d
i
v
i
d
3
1
0
2
l
a
c
s
i
f
r
o
f
e
m
o
c
n
i
l
g
n
i
t
a
r
e
p
o
s
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
e
r
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
a
n
o
n
r
u
t
e
R
.
3
1
0
2
,
8
2
l
i
r
p
A
d
n
a
,
3
1
0
2
,
7
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
,
2
1
0
2
,
8
2
r
e
b
o
t
c
O
,
2
1
0
2
,
9
2
y
l
u
J
,
2
1
0
2
,
9
2
i
l
i
r
p
A
g
n
d
n
e
s
d
o
i
r
e
p
e
v
i
f
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
u
d
e
t
u
p
m
o
c
d
e
y
o
p
m
e
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
l
i
i
f
o
0
8
e
g
a
p
n
o
g
n
n
n
g
e
b
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
C
o
t
s
e
t
o
N
e
h
t
f
o
6
1
e
t
o
N
e
e
S
)
1
(
)
2
(
)
3
(
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
f
o
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
C
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
h
s
a
c
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
m
r
e
t
-
t
r
o
h
S
t
i
d
e
r
c
f
o
e
n
i
L
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
s
s
e
l
,
t
b
e
d
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
L
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
n
o
n
-
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
m
r
e
t
-
g
n
o
l
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
-
e
l
b
a
y
a
p
s
e
x
a
t
e
m
o
c
n
I
l
d
e
y
o
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
l
a
t
o
T
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
t
b
u
S
:
s
s
e
L
)
2
(
d
e
y
o
l
p
m
E
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
e
g
a
r
e
v
A
:
s
e
t
o
N
CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTED EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE, NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 3, 2015, APRIL 27, 2014, AND APRIL 28,2013
(Amounts in Thousands) (Unaudited)
Consolidated Effective GAAP Income Tax Rate (1)
Reduction of U.S. Valuation Allowance
Undistributed Earnings From Foreign Subsidiaries
Non-Cash U.S. Income Tax Expense
Non-Cash Foreign Income Tax Expense
Consolidated Adjusted Effective Income Tax Rate (2)
Twelve Months Ended
May 3,
2015
34.3%
–
(3.0)%
(15.2)%
(0.4)%
15.7%
April 27,
2014
8.4%
–
26.3%
(17.1)%
–
17.6%
April 28,
2013
9.7%
59.7%
(34.6)%
(19.3)%
(1.3)%
14.2%
As reported
May 3,
2015
$ 22,956
7,885
$ 15,071
1.23
$
1.21
$
12,217
12,422
Income before income taxes
Income taxes (3)
Net income
Net income per share-basic
Net income per share-diluted
Average shares outstanding-basic
Average shares outstanding-diluted
Notes:
(1) Calculated by dividing consolidated income tax expense by consolidated income before income taxes.
(2) Represents estimated cash income tax expense for our subsidiaries located in Canada and China divided by consolidated income before income taxes.
(3) Proforma income taxes calculated using the Consolidated Adjusted Effective Income Tax Rate as reflected above.
$
$
$
$
$
Adjustments
–
1,756
(1,756)
(0.14)
(0.14)
12,177
12,414
Adjustments
$
–
$ (4,281)
$ 4,281
0.35
$
$
0.34
12,217
12,422
May 3, 2015
Proforma Net
of Adjustments
$ 22,956
3,604
$ 19,352
1.58
$
1.56
$
12,217
12,422
As reported
April 27,
2014
$ 19,043
1,596
$ 17,447
1.43
$
1.41
$
12,177
12,414
April 27, 2014
Proforma Net
of Adjustments
$ 19,043
3,352
$ 15,691
1.29
$
1.26
$
12,177
12,414
As reported
April 28,
2013
$ 20,289
1,972
$ 18,317
1.50
$
$
1.47
12,235
12,450
April 28, 2013
Proforma Net
Adjustments of Adjustments
–
$
909
$
$
(909)
$ 0.07
$ 0.07
12,235
12,450
$ 20,289
2,881
$ 17,408
1.42
$
1.40
$
12,235
12,450
FREE CASH FLOW RECONCILIATION
Net cash provided by operating activities
Minus: Capital Expenditures
Add: Proceeds from the sale of equipment
Add: Proceeds from life insurance polices
Minus: Payments on life insurance policies
Minus: Purchase of long-term investments
Add: Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Free cash flow
FY 2015
$ 26,111
(10,461)
727
320
(18)
(1,650)
109
(21)
$ 15,117
FY 2014
$ 20,219
(5,258)
407
–
(30)
(765)
143
(875)
$ 13,841
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 (Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Such statements are inherently subject to risks
and uncertainties. Further, forward looking statements are intended to speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we disclaim any duty to update
such statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise
are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often but not always characterized by qualifying words such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan”
and “project” and their derivatives, and include but are not limited to statements about expectations for our future operations, production levels, sales, profit
margins, profitability, operating income, capital expenditures, income taxes, SG&A or other expenses, pre-tax income, earnings, cash flow, and other performance
measures, as well as any statements regarding future economic or industry trends or future developments. Factors that could influence the matters discussed
in such statements include the level of housing starts and sales of existing homes, consumer confidence, trends in disposable income, and general economic
conditions. Decreases in these economic indicators could have a negative effect on our business and prospects. Likewise, increases in interest rates, particularly
home mortgage rates, and increases in consumer debt or the general rate of inflation, could affect us adversely. Changes in consumer tastes or preferences toward
products not produced by us could erode demand for our products. Changes in the value of the U.S. dollar versus other currencies could affect our financial results
because a significant portion of our operations are located outside the United States. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other currencies could make our
products less competitive on the basis of price in markets outside the United States, and strengthening of currencies in Canada and China can have a negative
impact on our sales of products produced in those places. Also, economic and political instability in international areas could affect our operations or sources of
goods in those areas, as well as demand for our products in international markets. Further information about these factors, as well as other factors that could affect
our future operations or financial results and the matters discussed in forward-looking statements, is included in Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2015, for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2015, and included as part of this annual report.
This document contains disclosures about free cash flow, a non-GAAP liquidity measure that we define as net cash provided by operating activities, less cash capital
expenditures, plus any proceeds from sales of equipment, plus proceeds from life insurance policies, plus excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation,
minus the purchase of long-term investments, minus the payments on life insurance policies, and plus or minus the effects of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents. Details of these calculations and a reconciliation to information from our GAAP financial statements is set forth in this report. Management
believes the disclosure of free cash flow provides useful information to investors because it measures our available cash flow for potential debt repayment, stock
repurchases, dividends, and additions to cash and cash equivalents. We note, however, that not all of the company’s free cash flow is available for discretionary
spending, as we have mandatory debt payments and other cash requirements that must be deducted from our cash available for future use. In operating our
business, management uses free cash flow to make decisions about what commitments of cash to make for operations, such as capital expenditures (and financing
arrangements for these expenditures), purchases of inventory or supplies, SG&A expenditure levels, compensation, and other commitments of cash, while still
allowing for adequate cash to meet known future commitments for cash, such as debt repayment, and also for making decisions about dividend payments and
share repurchases.
This document contains disclosures about return on capital, both for the entire company and for individual business segments. We define return on capital as
operating income (on an annualized basis if at a point other than the end of the fiscal year) divided by average capital employed. Operating income excludes
certain non-recurring charges, and average capital employed is calculated over rolling two – five fiscal periods, depending on which quarter is being presented.
Details of these calculations and a reconciliation to information from our GAAP financial statements is set forth in this report. We believe return on capital is an
accepted measure of earnings efficiency in relation to capital employed, but it is a non-GAAP performance measure that is not defined or calculated in the same
manner by all companies. This measure should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income or other performance measures, but we believe
it provides useful information to investors by comparing the operating income we produce to the asset base used to generate that income. Also, annualized
operating income does not necessarily indicate results that would be expected for the full fiscal year. We note that, particularly for return on capital measured at
the segment level, not all assets and expenses are allocated to our operating segments, and there are assets and expenses at the corporate (unallocated) level that
may provide support to a segment’s operations and yet are not included in the assets and expenses used to calculate that segment’s return on capital. Thus, the
average return on capital for the company’s segments will generally be different from the company’s overall return on capital. Management uses return on capital
to evaluate the company’s earnings efficiency and the relative performance of its segments.
This document contains disclosures about our consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate, which is a non-GAAP liquidity measure that represents our
estimated cash expenditures for income taxes. The consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate is calculated by eliminating the non-cash items that affect
our GAAP income tax expense, including adjustments to valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, reductions in income taxes due to net operating loss
(NOL) carryforwards, and non-cash foreign income tax expenses. Currently we do not pay income taxes in the U.S. due to NOL carryforward amounts, and thus
the consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate represents income tax expense for our subsidiaries located in China and Canada. A reconciliation of our
consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate to our consolidated effective GAAP income tax rate is set forth in this report. We believe this information is useful
to investors because it demonstrates the amount of cash, as a percentage of income before income taxes, expected to be required to fund our income tax liabilities
incurred for the periods reported. Our consolidated income tax expense on a GAAP basis can vary widely over different reporting periods due to the effects of
non-cash items, and we believe the calculation of our consolidated adjusted effective tax rate is helpful in comparing financial reporting periods and the amount
of income tax liability that we are or will be required to pay to taxing authorities in cash. We also note that, because the consolidated adjusted effective income tax
rate used to calculate adjusted net income is based on annualized amounts and estimates, adjusted net income for any quarter or year-to-date period does not
necessarily indicate results that could be expected for the full fiscal year. In addition, non-cash reductions in our U.S. NOL carryforwards are based on pre-tax losses
in prior periods and will not be available to reduce taxes on current earnings once the NOL carryforward amounts are utilized. Management uses the consolidated
adjusted effective income rate to analyze the effect that income tax expenditures are likely to have on cash balances and overall liquidity.
This document contains disclosures about our adjusted net income, which is a non-GAAP performance measure that incorporates the consolidated adjusted
effective income tax rate discussed in the preceding paragraph. Adjusted net income is calculated by multiplying the consolidated adjusted effective income
tax rate by the amount of income before income taxes shown on our income statement. Because the consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate eliminates
non-cash items that affect our GAAP income tax expense, adjusted net income is intended to demonstrate the amount of net income that would be generated
by our operations if only the cash portions of our income tax expense are deducted from income before income taxes. As noted above, our consolidated income
tax expense on a GAAP basis can vary widely over different reporting periods due to the effect of non-cash items, and we believe the calculation of adjusted
net income is useful to investors because it eliminates these items and aids in the analysis of comparable financial periods by reflecting the amount of earnings
available after the deduction of tax liabilities that are paid in cash. Adjusted net income should not be viewed in isolation by investors and should not be used as
a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. We also note that, because the consolidated adjusted effective income tax rate used to calculate
adjusted net income is based on annualized amounts and estimates, adjusted net income for any quarter or year-to-date period does not necessarily indicate
results that could be expected for the full fiscal year. In addition, the limitations on the usefulness of consolidated adjusted effective income tax rates described in
the preceding paragraph also apply to the usefulness of adjusted net income, since consolidated adjusted effective income tax rates are used to calculate adjusted
net income. Management uses adjusted net income to help it analyze the company’s earnings and performance after taking certain tax matters into account when
comparing comparable quarterly and year-to-date periods.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CORPORATE DIRECTORY
Robert G. Culp, III
Chairman of the Board
Director (E)
Thomas B. Gallagher, Jr.
Corporate Controller, Assistant Treasurer
and Assistant Corporate Secretary
Franklin N. Saxon
President and Chief Executive Officer
Patrick B. Flavin
Retired President and
Director (E)
Robert G. Culp, IV
President, Culp Home Fashions division
Boyd B. Chumbley
Executive Vice President,
Culp Upholstery Fabrics division
Kenneth R. Bowling
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
Chief Investment Officer,
Flavin, Blake & Co., Inc.,
an investment management company
Stamford, CT
Director (A,C,N)
Kenneth R. Larson
Owner and Chief Executive Officer,
Slumberland Furniture,
a retailer of furniture and bedding
Little Canada, MN
Director (A,C,N)
Kenneth W. McAllister
Member/Manager, The McAllister Firm
PLLC, a law firm
High Point, NC
Director (A,C,E,N,L)
Board Committees:
A-Audit
C-Compensation
E-Executive
N-Corporate Governance and
Nominating
L-Lead Director
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Corporate Address
Post Office Box 2686
1823 Eastchester Drive
High Point, NC 27265
Telephone: (336) 889-5161
Fax: (336) 887-7089
www.culp.com
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842
Shareholder Services: (800) 254-5196
www.computershare.com/investor
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Grant Thornton LLP
Charlotte, NC 28244
Legal Counsel
Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, PA
Charlotte, NC 28246
Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports/
Investor Contact
The Form 10-K Annual Report of Culp,
Inc., as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, is available
without charge to shareholders upon
written request. Shareholders may also
obtain copies of the corporate news
releases issued in conjunction with the
company’s quarterly results. These
requests and other investor contacts
should be directed to Kenneth R.
Bowling, Chief Financial Officer, at the
corporate address or at the investor
relations section at www.culp.com.
Analyst Coverage
These analysts cover Culp, Inc.:
Raymond James & Associates –
Budd Bugatch, CFA
Sidoti & Company, LLC – James Fronda
Stifel Financial Corp – John Baugh, CFA
Value Line – Craig Sirois
Stock Listing
Culp, Inc. common stock is traded on
the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol CFI. As of July 17, 2015, Culp, Inc.
had approximately 2,900 shareholders
based on the number of holders of
record and an estimate of the number
of individual participants represented by
security position listings.
Annual Meeting
Shareholders are cordially invited
to attend the annual meeting to be
held at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday,
September 16, 2015, at the company’s
corporate offices, 1823 Eastchester Drive,
High Point, North Carolina.
Culp, Inc.
1823 Eastchester Drive • Post Office Box 2686
High Point, NC 27265
(336) 889-5161
www.culp.com