Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Banks - Regional / DNB Financial Corporation

DNB Financial Corporation

dnbf · NASDAQ Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker dnbf
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Financial Services
Industry Banks - Regional
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · DNB Financial Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2017 

Annual Report

DNB Financial Corporation 
Selected Financial Data

At or for the year ended December 31
Dollars in thousands, except share data

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 
Interest income

Interest expense

Net interest income

Provision for credit losses

Non-interest income

Non-interest expense

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

Preferred stock dividends & accretion of discount

Net income available to common stockholders

PER SHARE DATA 
Basic earnings

Diluted earnings

Cash dividends

Book value

Tangible book value (Non-GAAP)

Average common shares outstanding

Average diluted common shares outstanding

PERFORMANCE RATIOS 
Return on average assets

Return on average stockholders’ equity

Return on average tangible equity (Non-GAAP)

Net interest margin

Efficiency ratio

Wtd average yield on earning assets

FINANCIAL CONDITION 
Total assets

Total liabilities

Total stockholders’ equity

Loans, gross

Allowance for credit losses

Investment securities
Goodwill

Intangible assets

Deposits

Borrowings

ASSET QUALITY RATIOS 
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

Non-performing loans/total loans

Non-performing assets/total assets

Allowance for credit loss/total loans

Allowance for credit loss/non-performing loans

CAPITAL RATIOS 
Total equity/total assets

Tangible equity/tangible assets

Tier 1 leverage ratio

Common equity tier 1 risk based capital ratio

Tier 1 risk based capital ratio

Total risk based capital ratio

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

$

$

43,385
5,720
37,665
1,660
5,418
28,021
13,402
5,456
7,946

–
7,946

$

$

1.87
1.85
0.28
23.78
20.06
4,260,137
4,290,070

$

29,179
3,324
25,855
730
6,364
24,641
6,848
1,869
4,979

$

–
4,979

$

$

1.56
1.55
0.28
22.36
18.56

$

24,478
2,712
21,766
1,105
5,009
19,029
6,641
1,503
5,138

$

50
5,088

$

$

1.82
1.79
0.28
19.65
19.58
2,801,881
2,847,488

$

23,596
2,311
21,285
1,130
4,958
18,632
6,481
1,677
4,804

$

135
4,669

$

$

1.69
1.66
0.28
18.33
18.26
2,766,723
2,812,726

$

23,212
2,888
20,324
2,530
4,795
17,450
5,139
1,220
3,919

$

148
3,771

$

$

1.38
1.36
0.28
16.55
16.47
2,742,417
2,780,752

%

0.74
7.93
9.44
3.73
63.75
4.28

%

0.59
7.40
9.74
3.31
75.53
3.72

%

0.69
8.72
8.73
3.16 
68.31
3.51

%

0.71
7.78
7.79
3.36
71.12
3.67

%

0.60
6.75
6.77
3.30
69.29
3.76

$

1,081,915
979,973
101,942
845,897
5,843
174,173
15,525
435
861,203
112,803

$

1,070,685
975,845
94,840
817,529
5,373
182,206
15,590
537
885,187
86,668

$

748,818
693,330
55,488
481,758
4,935
220,208
–
66
606,275
81,909

$

723,330
659,422
63,908
455,603
4,906
231,656
–
82
605,083
49,005

$

661,473
602,890
58,583
415,354
4,623
186,958
–
111
558,747
39,674

%

%

 0.15
0.89
1.16
0.69
77.36

9.42
8.07
9.19
10.71
11.80
13.73

%

0.05
1.04
1.05
0.66
63.20

%

8.86
7.46
8.42
9.60
10.67
12.50

%

0.23
1.06
1.02
1.02
96.91

%

7.41
7.40
8.94
10.44
12.08
14.78

%

0.19
1.50
1.07
1.08
71.59

%

8.84
8.82
10.55
10.50
14.90
15.92

%

1.20
1.38
1.03
1.11
80.70

%

8.86
8.84
10.61
10.51
15.35
16.40

Dear Valued Shareholders,

Our strong 2017 results reflect the significant progress we made last year to strengthen our banking franchise 
and seize growth opportunities in our markets.  Despite the challenging interest rate conditions that existed 
through much of 2017, we achieved solid earnings results and significantly improved our franchise value in the 
first full year of combined operations since our acquisition of East River Bank in 2016.  

Our objective is to maintain a consistent emphasis on long-term shareholder returns, while recognizing the need 
to adapt and compete in a rapidly changing banking environment.  Our plan to drive shareholder value remains 
focused on (1) providing high-quality products and services for our customers; (2) increasing productivity through 
disciplined growth; (3) maintaining credit discipline; and (4) tightly controlling overhead costs.  Continuing to 
grow our commercial lending is a key initiative as small to mid-size companies seek financing from a community 
bank with roots in, and a deep understanding of, the local business environment.  We are resolved to be that bank.  

We also continue to improve our risk management infrastructure, which involves a longer-term commitment in 
both employees and technology. Such ongoing investments will accomplish more than satisfying regulatory 
requirements; they help ensure that we can continue to meet the high expectations of shareholders, customers, 
and communities we serve.

The Company enjoyed another productive year featuring revenue and net income growth.  Total revenue for fiscal 
2017 was $43.1 million, which represented an increase of $10.9 million, or 33.7%, over fiscal 2016.  The increase 
was primarily due to including results from East River Bank for all 12 months of 2017, compared with only three 
months for 2016.  On a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis, our reported 2017 financial results 
were strong, with net income of $7.9 million, or $1.85 per diluted share, compared with $5.0 million, or $1.55 per 
diluted share, for fiscal 2016.  

$2.00

$1.75

$1.50

$1.25

$1.00

$0.75

$0.50

$0.25

$0.00

CONSISTENT EARNINGS

$1.66

$1.79

$1.85

$1.55

$1.36

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

Diluted EPS

FY2016

FY2017

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017 
included a one-time $1.8 million, or $0.43 per share, 
additional tax expense related to the enactment of 
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) in December 
2017.  In accordance with GAAP, the Company 
revalued certain of its net deferred tax assets to 
reflect the reduction of the corporate income tax rate 
to 21% from 34%.  We expect that the Company’s 
future earnings will directly benefit through the 
lower future tax rate and indirectly, should the Tax 
Act provide an economic stimulus to our customers. 
The following table shows the impact of the one-time 
tax expense related to the enactment of the Tax Act:

(Dollars in thousands,  
except per share data)

Net income per share, diluted
Deferred tax adjustment
Adjusted earnings per share

$

FY2017
1.85
0.43
2.28

$

$

FY2016
1.55
-
1.55

$

Net income
Deferred tax adjustment
Adjusted net income

$

$

7,946
1,846
9,792

$

$

4,979
-
4,979

Return on Average Assets (ROAA)
Adjusted ROAA 
Return on Average Equity (ROAE)
Adjusted ROAE

0.74%
0.91%
7.93%
9.77%

0.61%
0.61%
7.75%
7.75%

The adjusted returns on average assets (“ROAA”) and average equity (“ROAE”) for 2017 were 0.91% and 9.77%, 
respectively.  Full year 2017 results were impacted by the aforementioned adjustment of deferred taxes due 
to the enactment of the Tax Act.  DNB believes the adjusted, or non-GAAP measures, are meaningful because 
they reflect adjustments commonly made by management, investors, regulators, and analysts to evaluate the 
adequacy of common equity and performance trends.  

As of December 31, 2017, total assets were $1.1 billion, which was relatively unchanged from year-end 2016.  Our 
philosophy is to grow assets, including loans, only when our prudent underwriting standards are met.  Total 
loans, which comprise the majority of our assets, were $845.9 million at year-end 2017, which represented a 
3.5% increase from $817.5 million at December 31, 2016.  We believe that the economic outlook for the regional 
economy has brightened and are excited that our experienced lending team will take advantage of healthier 
conditions to accelerate loan growth.  

Net interest income, which represents the main source of revenue, increased to $37.7 million for 2017, from $25.9 
million for the previous year, largely due to the acquired loans from East River Bank as well as steady loan growth 
throughout the past year.  The net interest margin improved to 3.73% for 2017 compared with 3.31% for 2016, 
despite the historically low interest rate environment and the relatively flat yield curve that persisted throughout 
the past year. Our improvement was primarily due to the acquisition of East River, which contributed to both an 
increase in volume and the weighted average yield on our loan portfolio.  

Our emphasis on relationship banking is reflected by the level of core deposits, which were 79% of total deposits 
as of December 31, 2017.  As of the same date, non-interest-bearing deposits were 20.5% of total deposits and 
the loan-to-deposit ratio was 98.2%.  Core deposits are prized due to their lower cost of funding and are generally  
less sensitive to withdrawal when interest rates fluctuate compared with certificate of deposits.  At year-end 2017, 
total deposits were $861.2 million, compared with $885.2 million at December 31, 2016.  The year-over-year decline 
of $24.0 million was primarily due to a planned decrease in higher-costing time deposits. 

We are pleased to report that our wealth management business grew 18.0% on a year-over-year basis as wealth 
management assets under care increased to $252.8 million as of December 31, 2017. 

Credit quality remains a fundamental strength for DNB.  Our conservative underwriting standards are evidenced 
by the continued low level of net loan charge-offs.  Net charge-offs were 0.15% for the year ended December 31, 
2017, compared with 0.05% for the previous year.  Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans remained 
fairly stable and were only 0.89% as of December 31, 2017, compared with 1.04% at December 31, 2016.  The 
allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.69% as of December 31, 2017, compared with 0.66% 
as of year-end 2016.  Loans acquired in connection with the purchase of East River were recorded at fair value 
based on an initial estimate of expected cash flows, including a reduction for estimated credit losses, and without 
carryover of the respective portfolio’s historical allowance for credit losses.  At December 31, 2017, the allowance 
for credit losses as a percentage of originated loans, which represents all loans other than those acquired, was 1.0%. 

NCOS/AVG. LOANS RATIO

NPL/TOTAL LOANS RATIO

1.4%

1.2%

1.0%

0.8%

0.6%

0.4%

0.2%

0.0%

1.20%

0.19%

0.23%

0.15%

0.05%

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

1.6%

1.4%

1.2%

1.0%

0.8%

0.6%

0.4%

0.2%

0.0%

1.50%

1.38%

1.06%

1.04%

0.89%

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

 
We remain committed to maintaining a strong capital base in order to support our long-range business plan, 
reward shareholders, and satisfy bank regulators.  The Company and the Bank exceeded all regulatory standards 
to be considered “well-capitalized.”  As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s Tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.2%, the 
Tier 1 to risk weighted assets ratio was 11.8%, and total risk-based capital ratio was 13.7%.  As of the same date, 
the tangible common equity-to-tangible assets ratio was 8.1%.  Our quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share, most 
recently paid in December 2017, represents 34 consecutive quarters of cash dividend payments.  Tangible book 
value per share increased to $20.06 at December 31, 2017 from $18.56 at December 31, 2016.

$22.00

$20.00

$18.00

$16.00

$14.00

$12.00

$10.00

TANGIBLE BOOK VALUE GROWTH

$19.58

$18.26

$18.56

$20.06

$16.48

FY2013

FY2014

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

16%

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

STRONG CAPITAL RATIOS

13.7%

11.8%

9.2%

10.0%

5.0%

8.0%

December 31, 2017

Required to be Well Capitalized

Book Value per Share

Leverage Ratio

Total Risk-Based Capital 

Tier 1 Ratio

Managing interest rate risk has been, and will continue to be, one of our top priorities.  The Asset Liability 
Management Committee actively monitors and manages our interest rate exposure using simulation models and  
gap analysis in order to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income, while 
maximizing earnings.  The Company’s strategy has been to seek shorter duration over yield in its lending and 
investing activities and lengthen duration over rate in its financing activities to reduce interest rate risk.  We believe 
that our strong funding base, which consists primarily of core deposits, also helps to protect the Company against 
volatile changes in interest rates.  

The Company’s strong financials are reflected in our longer term stock performance as shown below.  Our stock 
price increased 18.7% in fiscal 2017, compared with stock price appreciation of 16.0% for banks and thrifts in the 
SNL Financial Index of U.S. Banks and Thrifts.  Over the past three years, the Company’s stock price appreciation 
was 56.0% compared with 42.4% for the same Index.  On June 26, 2017, DNB Financial was added as a member of 
the broad-market Russell 3000 Index, as part of the 2017 Russell indices reconstitution.

3-YEAR PRICE CHANGE

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

(0)

(10)

(20)

%

(30)

D ec 2014

Feb 2015

A pr 2015

Jun 2015

Aug 2015

Oct 2015

D ec 2015

Feb 2016

A pr 2016

Jun 2016

Aug 2016

Oct 2016

D ec 2016

Feb 2017

A pr 2017

Jun 2017

Aug 2017

Oct 2017

D ec 2017

DNBF 
(+56.0%)

SNL U.S. Bank  
and Thrift  
(+42.4%)

S&P 500  
(+29.9%)

Source: S&P Global  
Market Intelligence

Our Team

Our management and employees faced a challenging year in 2017 as the Company tackled an increasingly 
competitive banking environment.  We are quite proud of our employees and management and thank them for 
their hard work and dedication.  

We are saddened to report that James J. Koegel, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, passed away on 
January 6, 2018.  Jim was a Director since 2003 and served on the Board’s Benefits and Compensation, Executive, 
Board Loan, and Audit committees and was past Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  
The Company remains extremely grateful for Mr. Koegel’s dedication and service and we extend our sincerest 
condolences to the Koegel family.

We were pleased to announce that Peter R. Barsz joined our Board of Directors in January 2018.  Peter is a 
Partner in the accounting firm of Barsz, Gowie, Amon & Fultz, LLC, which serves municipal entities, businesses, and 
individuals throughout Pennsylvania and the Greater Delaware Valley.  We welcome Peter’s expertise and strong 
relationships in the local business community.

Outlook for Fiscal 2018

As we enter 2018, we are keenly aware of the opportunities that lie ahead for DNB Financial Corporation.  We are 
proud of our many accomplishments in 2017, and look forward to seizing future opportunities.  In addition to our 
attention to organic growth, we intend to watch for situations to acquire branches, banks, or other financial 
services firms that augment our market penetration and enhance long-term strategic value.  This game plan has 
resulted in 25 consecutive years of uninterrupted profitability. 

Our major banking concerns include the likelihood of higher interest rates along with inflationary pressures, a 
flatter yield curve, increased technology demands, and the prospect of increased market volatility.  We have made, 
and will continue to make, necessary investments in technology to protect our customers’ personal information 
from data breaches and the threat of cyber-attacks.  Our philosophy is to match our modern-day products and 
services with our customers’ needs, which is in their best interests and fosters long-term relationships.

On behalf of our Board, management team, and employees, we thank you for your ongoing loyalty and  
support.  Your investment is important to us, and we appreciate your trust as we continue to serve you as a high 
performance bank.

Sincerely,

James H. Thornton 
Chairman of the Board 

             William J. Hieb
             President and CEO

   
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
(cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
or
(cid:2) TRANSITION REPORT  PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the  transition period  from 

 to 

. Commission file Number 1-34242

(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

18MAR201400595322

Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
4 Brandywine Avenue, Downingtown,  Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive  offices)

23-2222567
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

19335
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (610) 269-1040
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share

Name of each exchange on which registered
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  well-known  seasoned  issuer,  as  defined  in  Rule  405  of  the  Securities
Act.  (cid:2) Yes (cid:1) No
Indicate  by  check  mark  if  the  registrant  is  not  required  to  file  reports  pursuant  to  Section  13  or  Section  15(d)  of  the
Act.  (cid:2) Yes (cid:1) No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  during  the  preceding  12  months  (or  for  such  shorter  period  that  the  Registrant  was  required  to  file  such
reports), and (2) has been  subject to  such  filing  requirements for the past 90 days. (cid:1) Yes (cid:2)  No
Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  and  posted  on  its  corporate  Web  site,  if  any,  every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). (cid:1) Yes (cid:2) No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be  contained,  to  the  best  of  registrant’s  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information  statements  incorporated  by  reference  in
Part  III of this Form 10-K or any amendment  to  this Form 10-K. (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller or
a  emerging  growth  company  reporting  company.  See  the  definitions  of  ‘‘large  accelerated  filer,’’  ‘‘accelerated  filer,’’  and  ‘‘smaller
reporting company’’ and ‘‘emerging growth company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated  filer (cid:2)

Accelerated  filer (cid:1)

Non-accelerated filer  (cid:2)
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  (cid:2)
Emerging growth company (cid:2)

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying  with any new or revised financial  accounting standards provide pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. (cid:2)
Indicate by  check mark whether the registrant is  a  shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (cid:2)  Yes (cid:1) No
The  aggregate  market  value  of  the  shares  of  common  stock  of  the  Registrant  issued  and  outstanding  on  June  30,  2017,  which
excludes 746,000 shares held by all directors, officers and affiliates of the Registrant as a group, was approximately $120.5 million.
This figure is based on the closing price of $34.30 per share of the Registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2017, the last business day
of the  Registrant’s  second fiscal  quarter.
As of March 12, 2018, the  Registrant had  outstanding 4,290,827 shares of Common Stock, $1 par value per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions  of  the  Registrant’s  definitive  Proxy  Statement  relating  to  the  2018  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  are  incorporated  by
reference into Part  III of this Form 10-K.

FORM 10-K
DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Table of Contents

Part I

Part II

Part III

Part IV

Item 1.

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 2.

Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition  and Results
of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About  Market Risk . . . . . . . . . .

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements  with Accountants  on Accounting  and
Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 11.

Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 12.

Item 13.

Security Ownership of Certain  Beneficial  Owners and  Management and
Related Stockholder  Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and  Director
Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and  Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

3

13

26

27

27

27

28

30

31

61

62

123

123

127

128

128

128

128

128

129

129

134

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-K

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other written or oral communications made from time
to time by us, contains forward-looking information within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the
U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to future events or future
predictions,  including  events  or  predictions  relating  to  future  financial  performance,  and  are  generally
identifiable  by  the  use  of  forward-looking  terminology  such  as  ‘‘believe,’’  ‘‘expect,’’  ‘‘may,’’  ‘‘will,’’
‘‘should,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ or ‘‘anticipate’’ or the negative thereof or comparable terminology. Forward-
looking  statements  reflect  numerous  assumptions,  estimates  and  forecasts  as  to  future  events.  No
assurance  can  be  given  that  the  assumptions,  estimates  and  forecasts  underlying  such  forward-looking
statements will accurately reflect future conditions, or that any guidance, goals, targets or projected results
will  be  realized.  The  assumptions,  estimates  and  forecasts  underlying  such  forward-looking  statements
involve  judgments  with  respect  to,  among  other  things,  future  economic,  competitive,  regulatory  and
financial  market  conditions  and  future  business  decisions,  which  may  not  be  realized  and  which  are
inherently  subject  to  significant  business,  economic,  competitive  and  regulatory  uncertainties  and  known
and  unknown  risks,  including  the  risks  described  under  ‘‘Risk  Factors’’  in  this  Annual  Report  on
Form 10-K, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including our
Quarterly  Reports  on  Form  10-Q.  Our  actual  results  may  differ  materially  from  those  reflected  in  the
forward-looking statements.

In addition to the risks described in the ‘‘Risk Factors’’ section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and the other reports we file with the SEC, important factors to consider and evaluate with respect to such
forward-looking statements include:

(cid:127) Changes in external competitive market factors that  might impact  our results of  operations;

(cid:127) Changes in laws and regulations, including without limitation changes in capital requirements under

Basel III;

(cid:127) The impact of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, including, but not limited to, the effect of
a lower federal corporate income tax rate, including on the valuation of our tax assets and liabilities;

(cid:127) Changes  in  our  business  strategy  or  an  inability  to  execute  our  strategy  due  to  the  occurrence  of

unanticipated events;

(cid:127) Local, regional and national economic conditions and events, including real estate values, and the

impact they may have on us and our customers;

(cid:127) Costs  and  effects  of  regulatory  and  legal  developments,  including  official  and  unofficial
interpretations  by  regulatory  agencies  of  laws  and  regulations,  the  results  of  regulatory
examinations and the outcome of regulatory or other governmental inquiries and proceedings, such
as fines or restrictions on our business activities;

(cid:127) Our ability to attract deposits and  other sources of  liquidity;

(cid:127) Changes in the financial performance  and/or condition of our borrowers;

(cid:127) Our ability to access the capital markets to fund our operations and future growth;

(cid:127) Changes in the level of non-performing  and classified  assets and charge-offs;

(cid:127) Changes  in  estimates  of  future  loan  loss  reserve  requirements  based  upon  the  periodic  review

thereof under relevant regulatory and  accounting requirements;

(cid:127) Inflation, interest rate, securities market and monetary fluctuations;

1

(cid:127) Timely  development  and  acceptance  of  new  banking  products  and  services  and  perceived  overall

value of these products and services by users;

(cid:127) Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and  saving  habits;

(cid:127) Technological changes;

(cid:127) Significant  disruption  in  the  technology  platforms  on  which  we  rely,  including  security  failures,
cyberattacks  or  other  breaches  of  our  systems  or  those  of  our  customers,  partners  or  service
providers;

(cid:127) Continued volatility in the credit and equity markets and its effect on the general economy;

(cid:127) Effects  of  changes  in  accounting  policies  and  practices,  as  may  be  adopted  by  the  regulatory
agencies,  as  well  as  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the  Financial  Accounting
Standards Board and other accounting standard setters;

(cid:127) Our  ability  to  identify  potential  candidates  for,  and  consummate,  acquisition  or  investment

transactions;

(cid:127) The timing of acquisition, investment,  or disposition transactions;

(cid:127) Constraints  on  our  ability  to  consummate  an  attractive  acquisition  or  investment  transaction

because of significant competition for these opportunities;

(cid:127) The  businesses  of  DNB  and  any  acquisition  targets  or  merger  partners  and  subsidiaries  not
integrating  successfully  or  such  integration  being  more  difficult,  time-consuming  or  costly  than
expected;

(cid:127) Material  differences  in  the  actual  financial  results  of  merger  and  acquisition  activities  compared
with expectations, such as with respect to the full realization of anticipated cost savings and revenue
enhancements within the expected time frame;

(cid:127) Our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy, increase market share, control expenses

and maintain liquidity; and

(cid:127) DNB First’s ability to pay dividends to DNB Financial  Corporation.

You  are  cautioned  not  to  place  undue  reliance  on  any  forward-looking  statements  we  make,  which
speak  only  as  of  the  date  they  are  made.  We  do  not  undertake  any  obligation  to  release  publicly  or
otherwise  provide  any  revisions  to  any  forward-looking  statements  we  may  make,  including  any  forward-
looking  financial  information,  to  reflect  events  or  circumstances  occurring  after  the  date  hereof  or  to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events,  except as may be required under applicable law.

2

Item 1.

Business

Part I

General Description of Registrant’s Business and  Its  Development

DNB Financial Corporation (the ‘‘Registrant’’ or ‘‘DNB’’), a Pennsylvania business corporation, is a
bank holding company registered with and supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Federal Reserve Board). The Registrant was incorporated on October 28, 1982 and commenced
operations  on  July  1,  1983  upon  consummation  of  the  acquisition  of  all  of  the  outstanding  stock  of
Downingtown  National  Bank,  now  known  as  DNB  First,  National  Association  (the  ‘‘Bank’’).  Since
commencing  operations,  DNB’s  business  has  consisted  primarily  of  managing  and  supervising  the  Bank,
and its principal source of income has been derived from the Bank. At December 31, 2017, DNB had total
consolidated  assets,  total  liabilities  and  stockholders’  equity  of  $1.1  billion,  $980.0  million,  and
$101.9 million, respectively.

The Bank was organized in 1860. The Bank is a national banking association that is a member of the
Federal Reserve System, the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(‘‘FDIC’’). The Bank is a full service commercial bank providing a wide range of services to individuals and
small to medium sized businesses in the southeastern Pennsylvania market area, including accepting time,
demand,  and  savings  deposits  and  making  secured  and  unsecured  commercial,  real  estate  and  consumer
loans.  In  addition,  the  Bank  has  fifteen  (15)  full  service  branches  and  a  full-service  wealth  management
group  known  as  ‘‘DNB  First  Wealth  Management.’’  The  Bank’s  financial  subsidiary,  DNB  Financial
Services,  Inc.,  (also  known  as  ‘‘DNB  Investments  &  Insurance’’)  is  a  Pennsylvania  licensed  insurance
agency,  which,  through  a  third  party  marketing  agreement  with  Cetera  Investment  Services,  LLC,  sells  a
broad variety of insurance and investment products. The Bank’s other subsidiaries are Downco, Inc. and
DN  Acquisition  Company,  Inc.  which  were  incorporated  in  December  1995  and  December  2008,
respectively,  for  the  purpose  of  acquiring  and  holding  Other  Real  Estate  Owned  acquired  through
foreclosure or deed in-lieu-of foreclosure, as  well as  Bank-occupied real estate.

The  Bank’s  headquarters  is  located  at  4  Brandywine  Avenue,  Downingtown,  Pennsylvania.  As  of
December  31,  2017,  the  Bank  had  total  assets  of  $1.1  billion,  total  deposits  of  $861.4  million  and  total
stockholders’  equity  of  $120.3  million.  The  Bank’s  business  is  not  seasonal  in  nature.  The  FDIC,  to  the
extent provided by law, insures its deposits. On December 31, 2017, the Bank had 163 full-time employees
and 20 part-time employees.

The Bank derives its income principally from interest charged on loans and, to a lesser extent, interest
earned on investments, fees received in connection with the origination of loans, wealth management and
other  services.  The  Bank’s  principal  expenses  are  interest  expense  on  deposits  and  borrowings  and
operating expenses. Funds for activities are provided principally by operating revenues, deposit growth and
the repayment of outstanding loans and  investments.

The  Bank  encounters  vigorous  competition  from  a  number  of  sources,  including  other  commercial
banks,  thrift  institutions,  other  financial  institutions  and  financial  intermediaries.  In  addition  to
commercial  banks,  Federal  and  state  savings  and  loan  associations,  savings  banks,  credit  unions  and
industrial savings banks actively compete in the Bank’s market area to provide a wide variety of banking
services. Mortgage banking firms, real estate investment trusts, finance companies, insurance companies,
leasing  companies  and  brokerage  companies,  financial  affiliates  of  industrial  companies  and  certain
government agencies provide additional competition for loans and for certain financial services. The Bank
also  competes  for  interest-bearing  funds  with  a  number  of  other  financial  intermediaries,  which  offer  a
diverse range of investment alternatives, including  brokerage firms and mutual fund companies.

3

Business  Combinations

DNB and its subsidiaries engaged in  the following business combination since  January 1, 2013:

Effective October 1, 2016, DNB completed its merger (the ‘‘Merger’’) with East River Bank (‘‘ERB’’),
a locally-managed institution, headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the ‘‘Merger Agreement’’) dated as of April 4, 2016, at the effective time of the Merger,
ERB merged with and into DNB First, N.A., a  wholly owned subsidiary  of  DNB.

The acquisition added 3 full service branches in Philadelphia County, bringing DNB’s branch count to
fifteen  (15)  in  the  Greater  Philadelphia  Region.  In  addition,  the  acquisition  added  approximately
$306.4 million in loans and $227.2 million in deposits.

In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, holders of East River Bank common shares
received,  in  aggregate,  $6.7  million  in  cash  and  1,368,527  shares  or  approximately  32%  of  DNB’s
outstanding  common  stock.  The  transaction  was  valued  at  $47.5  million  based  on  DNB’s  September  30,
2016 closing share price of $25.36 as quoted on NASDAQ. The results of the combined entity’s operations
have  been  included  in  DNB’s  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  from  the  date  of  acquisition.  The
acquisition  of  ERB  was  accounted  for  as  a  business  combination  using  the  acquisition  method  of
accounting,  which  includes  estimating  the  fair  value  of  assets  acquired,  liabilities  assumed  and
consideration paid as of the acquisition  date.  See  Note 2  —  Business Combinations.

DNB’s internet website address is www.dnbfirst.com. Information on DNB’s website is not part of this
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K.  Investors  can  obtain  copies  of  DNB’s  annual  report  on  Form  10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on
DNB’s website (accessible under ‘‘Investor Relations’’ — ‘‘SEC Filings’’) as soon as reasonably practicable
after DNB has filed such materials with, or furnished them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’). DNB will also furnish a paper copy of such filings free of charge upon request. Investors can also
read  and  copy  any  materials  filed  by  DNB  with  the  SEC  at  the  SEC’s  Public  Reference  Room  which  is
located  at  100  F  Street,  NE,  Washington,  DC  20549.  Information  about  the  operation  of  the  Public
Reference  Room  can  be  obtained  by  calling  the  SEC  at  1-800-SEC-0330.  DNB’s  filings  can  also  be
accessed at the SEC’s internet website:  https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?CIK=713671.

Supervision and Regulation — Registrant

Federal Banking Laws

The Registrant is subject to a number of complex Federal banking laws, most notably the provisions of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (‘‘Bank Holding Company Act’’) and the Change in
Bank Control Act of 1978 (‘‘Change in Control Act’’), and to supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.

Bank Holding Company Act — Financial  Holding Companies

The Bank Holding Company Act requires a ‘‘company’’ (including the Registrant) to secure the prior
approval  of  the  Federal  Reserve  Board  before  it  owns  or  controls,  directly  or  indirectly,  more  than  five
percent (5%) of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any bank. It also prohibits acquisition
by  any  ‘‘company’’  (including  the  Registrant)  of  more  than  five  percent  (5%)  of  the  voting  shares  of,  or
interest in, or all or substantially all of the assets of, any bank located outside of the state in which a current
bank  subsidiary  is  located  unless  such  acquisition  is  specifically  authorized  by  laws  of  the  state  in  which
such bank is located. A ‘‘bank holding company’’ (including the Registrant) is prohibited from engaging in
or acquiring direct or indirect control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting shares of any company
engaged in non-banking activities unless the Federal Reserve Board, by order or regulation, has found such
activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident
thereto. In making this determination, the Federal Reserve Board considers whether the performance of

4

these  activities  by  a  bank  holding  company  would  offer  benefits  to  the  public  that  outweigh  possible
adverse  effects.  Applications  under  the  Bank  Holding  Company  Act  and  the  Change  in  Control  Act  are
subject to review, based upon the record of compliance of the applicant with the Community Reinvestment
Act of 1977 (‘‘CRA’’). See further discussion below.

The Registrant is required to file an annual report with the Federal Reserve Board and any additional
information that the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act. The
Federal  Reserve  Board  may  also  make  examinations  of  the  Registrant  and  any  or  all  of  its  subsidiaries.
Further, under Section 106 of the 1970 amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act and the Federal
Reserve Board’s regulations, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in
certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of credit or provision of
any property or services. The so-called ‘‘anti-tie-in’’ provisions state generally that a bank may not extend
credit, lease, sell property or furnish any service to a customer on the condition that the customer provide
additional credit or service to the bank, to its bank holding company or to any other subsidiary of its bank
holding  company  or  on  the  condition  that  the  customer  not  obtain  other  credit  or  service  from  a
competitor of the bank, its bank holding company  or any subsidiary of its  bank  holding  company.

Permitted  Non-Banking  Activities.  The  Federal  Reserve  Board  permits  bank  holding  companies  to
engage in non-banking activities so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a
proper incident thereto. A number of activities are authorized by Federal Reserve Board regulation, while
other  activities  require  prior  Federal  Reserve  Board  approval.  The  types  of  permissible  activities  are
subject to change by the Federal Reserve Board. Revisions to the Bank Holding Company Act contained in
the  Gramm-Leach  Bliley  Act  of  1999  permit  certain  eligible  bank  holding  companies  to  qualify  as
‘‘financial  holding  companies’’  and  thereupon  engage  in  a  wider  variety  of  financial  services  such  as
securities  and  insurance  activities,  and  subject  such  companies  to  increased  competition  from  a  wider
variety of non-banking competitors as well as banks.

Gramm-Leach Bliley Act of 1999 (‘‘GLB’’). This law repealed certain restrictions on bank and securities
firm  affiliations,  and  allows  bank  holding  companies  to  elect  to  be  treated  as  a  ‘‘financial  holding
company’’ that can engage in approved ‘‘financial activities,’’ including insurance, securities underwriting
and merchant banking. Banks without holding companies can engage in many of these financial activities
through a ‘‘financial subsidiary.’’ The law also mandates functional regulation of bank securities activities.
Banks’ exemption from broker-dealer regulation is limited to, for example, trust, safekeeping, custodian,
shareholder  and  employee  benefit  plans,  sweep  accounts,  private  placements  (under  certain  conditions),
self-directed  IRAs,  third  party  networking  arrangements  to  offer  brokerage  services  to  bank  customers,
and  the  like.  It  also  requires  banks  that  advise  mutual  funds  to  register  as  investment  advisers.  The
legislation  provides  for  state  regulation  of  insurance,  subject  to  certain  specified  state  preemption
standards. It establishes which insurance products banks and bank subsidiaries may provide as principal or
underwriter,  and  prohibits  bank  underwriting  of  title  insurance,  but  also  preempts  state  laws  interfering
with affiliations. GLB prohibits approval of new de novo thrift charter applications by commercial entities
and  limits  sales  of  existing  so-called  ‘‘unitary’’  thrifts  to  commercial  entities.  The  law  bars  banks,  savings
and loans, credit unions, securities firms and insurance companies, as well as other ‘‘financial institutions,’’
from disclosing customer account numbers or access codes to unaffiliated third parties for telemarketing or
other  direct  marketing  purposes,  and  enables  customers  of  financial  institutions  to  ‘‘opt  out’’  of  having
their personal financial information shared with unaffiliated third parties, subject to exceptions related to
the  processing  of  customer  transactions  and  joint  financial  services  marketing  arrangements  with  third
parties, as long as the institution discloses the activity to its customers and requires the third party to keep
the information confidential. It requires policies on privacy and disclosure of information to be disclosed
annually,  requires  federal  regulators  to  adopt  comprehensive  regulations  for  ensuring  the  security  and
confidentiality of consumers’ personal information, and allows state laws to give consumers greater privacy
protections. The GLB has increased the competition the Bank faces from a wider variety of non-banking
competitors as well as banks.

5

Change  in Bank Control Act

Under the Change in Control Act, no person, acting directly or indirectly or through or in concert with
one  or  more  other  persons,  may  acquire  ‘‘control’’  of  any  Federally  insured  depository  institution  unless
the  appropriate  Federal  banking  agency  has  been  given  60  days  prior  written  notice  of  the  proposed
acquisition and within that period has not issued a notice disapproving of the proposed acquisition or has
issued written notice of its intent not to disapprove the action. The period for the agency’s disapproval may
be extended by the agency. Upon receiving such notice, the Federal agency is required to provide a copy to
the  appropriate  state  regulatory  agency,  if  the  institution  of  which  control  is  to  be  acquired  is  state
chartered, and the Federal agency is obligated to give due consideration to the views and recommendations
of  the  state  agency.  Upon  receiving  a  notice,  the  Federal  agency  is  also  required  to  conduct  an
investigation  of  each  person  involved  in  the  proposed  acquisition.  Notice  of  such  proposal  is  to  be
published and public comment solicited thereon. A proposal may be disapproved by the Federal agency if
the proposal would have anticompetitive effects, if the proposal would jeopardize the financial stability of
the institution to be acquired or prejudice the interests of its depositors, if the competence, experience or
integrity of any acquiring person or proposed management personnel indicates that it would not be in the
interest of depositors or the public to permit such person to control the institution, if any acquiring person
fails  to  furnish  the  Federal  agency  with  all  information  required  by  the  agency,  or  if  the  Federal  agency
determines that the proposed transaction would result in an adverse effect on a deposit insurance fund. In
addition, the Change in Control Act requires that, whenever any Federally insured depository institution
makes  a  loan  or  loans  secured,  or  to  be  secured,  by  25%  or  more  of  the  outstanding  voting  stock  of  a
Federally insured depository institution, the president or chief executive officer of the lending bank must
promptly report such fact to the appropriate Federal banking agency regulating the institution whose stock
secures the loan or loans.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The federal government is considering
a  variety  of  reforms  related  to  banking  and  the  financial  industry  including,  without  limitation,  the
Dodd-Frank  Act.  The  Dodd-Frank  Act  is  intended  to  promote  financial  stability  in  the  U.S.,  reduce  the
risk  of  bailouts  and  protect  against  abusive  financial  services  practices  by  improving  accountability  and
transparency in the financial system and ending ‘‘too big to fail’’ institutions. It is the broadest overhaul of
the  U.S.  financial  system  since  the  Great  Depression,  and  much  of  its  impact  will  be  determined  by  the
scope  and  substance  of  many  regulations  that  will  need  to  be  adopted  by  various  regulatory  agencies  to
implement its provisions. For these reasons, the overall impact on DNB and its subsidiaries is unknown at
this  time.

The  Dodd-Frank  Act  delegates  to  various  federal  agencies  the  task  of  implementing  its  many
provisions through regulation. Hundreds of new federal regulations, studies and reports addressing all of
the  major  areas  of  the  new  law,  including  the  regulation  of  banks  and  their  holding  companies,  will  be
required,  ensuring  that  federal  rules  and  policies  in  this  area  will  be  further  developing  for  months  and
years to come. Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and anticipated implementing regulations,
it  is  highly  likely  that  banks  and  thrifts  as  well  as  their  holding  companies  will  be  subject  to  significantly
increased regulation and compliance obligations.

The Dodd-Frank Act could require us to make material expenditures, in particular personnel training
costs and additional compliance expenses, or otherwise adversely affect our business or financial results. It
could  also  require  us  to  change  certain  of  our  business  practices,  adversely  affect  our  ability  to  pursue
business  opportunities  we  might  otherwise  consider  engaging  in,  cause  business  disruptions  and/or  have
other  impacts  that  are  as-of-yet  unknown  to  DNB  and  the  Bank.  Failure  to  comply  with  these  laws  or
regulations,  even  if  inadvertent,  could  result  in  negative  publicity,  fines  or  additional  licensing  expenses,
any  of  which  could  have  an  adverse  effect  on  our  cash  flow  and  results  of  operations.  For  example,  a
provision  of  the  Dodd-Frank  Act  is  intended  to  preclude  bank  holding  companies  from  treating  future
trust  preferred  securities  issuances  as  Tier  1  capital  for  regulatory  capital  adequacy  purposes.  This
provision  may  narrow  the  number  of  possible  capital  raising  opportunities  DNB  and  other  bank  holding

6

companies might have in the future. As another example, the new law establishes the Consumer Financial
Protection  Bureau,  which  has  been  given  substantive  rule-making  authority  under  most  of  the  consumer
protection  regulations  affecting  the  Bank  and  its  customers.  The  Bureau  and  new  rules  it  will  issue  may
materially  affect  the  methods  and  costs  of  compliance  by  the  Bank  in  connection  with  future  consumer
related transactions.

Pennsylvania Banking Laws

Under the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended (‘‘PA Code’’), the Registrant is permitted
to control an unlimited number of banks, subject to prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board as more
fully  described  above.  The  PA  Code  authorizes  reciprocal  interstate  banking  without  any  geographic
limitation.  Reciprocity  between  states  exists  when  a  foreign  state’s  law  authorizes  Pennsylvania  bank
holding  companies  to  acquire  banks  or  bank  holding  companies  located  in  that  state  on  terms  and
conditions substantially no more restrictive than those applicable to such an acquisition by a bank holding
company  located  in  that  state.  Interstate  ownership  of  banks  in  Pennsylvania  with  banks  in  Delaware,
Maryland,  New  Jersey,  Ohio,  New  York  and  other  states  is  currently  authorized.  Some  state  laws  still
restrict de novo formations of branches in other states, but restrictions on interstate de novo banking have
been  relaxed  by  the  Dodd-Frank  Act.  Pennsylvania  law  also  provides  Pennsylvania  state  chartered
institutions elective parity with the power of national banks, federal thrifts, and state-chartered institutions
in other states as authorized by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘Competing Institutions’’). In
some cases, this may give state chartered institutions broader powers than national banks such as the Bank,
and may increase competition the Bank  faces  from other banking institutions.

Supervision and Regulation — Bank

The  operations  of  the  Bank  are  subject  to  Federal  and  State  statutes  applicable  to  banks  chartered
under  the  banking  laws  of  the  United  States,  to  members  of  the  Federal  Reserve  System  and  to  banks
whose deposits are insured by the FDIC. Bank operations are also subject to regulations of the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency (‘‘OCC’’), the Federal  Reserve Board  and the FDIC.

The  primary  supervisory  authority  of  the  Bank  is  the  OCC,  who  regularly  examines  the  Bank.  The
OCC  has  the  authority  to  prevent  a  national  bank  from  engaging  in  an  unsafe  or  unsound  practice  in
conducting its business.

Federal  and  state  banking  laws  and  regulations  govern,  among  other  things,  the  scope  of  a  bank’s
business,  the  investments  a  bank  may  make,  the  reserves  against  deposits  a  bank  must  maintain,  loans  a
bank makes and collateral it takes, the activities of a bank with respect to mergers and consolidations and
the  establishment  of  branches.  All  nationally  and  state-chartered  banks  in  Pennsylvania  are  permitted  to
maintain branch offices in any county of the state. National bank branches may be established only after
approval by the OCC. It is the general policy of the OCC to approve applications to establish and operate
domestic  branches,  including  ATMs  and  other  automated  devices  that  take  deposits,  provided  that
approval would not violate applicable Federal or state laws regarding the establishment of such branches.
The OCC reserves the right to deny an application or grant approval subject to conditions if (1) there are
significant supervisory concerns with respect to the applicant or affiliated organizations, (2) in accordance
with CRA, the applicant’s record of helping meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low
and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound operation, is less than satisfactory, or
(3) any financial or other business arrangement, direct or indirect, involving the proposed branch or device
and bank ‘‘insiders’’ (directors, officers, employees and 10% or greater shareholders) involves terms and
conditions  more  favorable  to  the  insiders  than  would  be  available  in  a  comparable  transaction  with
unrelated parties.

The Bank, as a subsidiary of a bank holding company, is subject to certain restrictions imposed by the
Federal  Reserve  Act  on  any  extensions  of  credit  to  the  bank  holding  company  or  its  subsidiaries,  on

7

investments in the stock or other securities of the bank holding company or its subsidiaries and on taking
such  stock  or  securities  as  collateral  for  loans.  The  Federal  Reserve  Act  and  Federal  Reserve  Board
regulations also place certain limitations and reporting requirements on extensions of credit by a bank to
principal  shareholders  of  its  parent  holding  company,  among  others,  and  to  related  interests  of  such
principal shareholders. In addition, such legislation and regulations may affect the terms upon which any
person becoming a principal shareholder of a holding company may obtain credit from banks with which
the subsidiary bank maintains a correspondent relationship.

Capital Adequacy

Federal banking laws impose on banks certain minimum requirements for capital adequacy. Federal
banking agencies have issued certain ‘‘risk-based capital’’ guidelines, and certain ‘‘leverage’’ requirements
on member banks such as the Bank. Banking regulators have authority to require higher minimum capital
ratios for an individual bank or bank holding company in view of its circumstances.

New Capital Rules. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amend
the  regulatory  risk-based  capital  rules  applicable  to  the  Corporation  and  the  Bank.  The  FDIC  and  the
OCC  have  subsequently  approved  these  rules.  The  final  rules  were  adopted  following  the  issuance  of
proposed  rules  by  the  Federal  Reserve  in  June  2012,  and  implement  the  ‘‘Basel  III’’  regulatory  capital
reforms  and  changes  required  by  the  Dodd-Frank  Act.  ‘‘Basel  III’’  refers  to  two  consultative  documents
released  by  the  Basel  Committee  on  Banking  Supervision  in  December  2009,  the  rules  text  released  in
December  2010,  and  loss  absorbency  rules  issued  in  January  2011,  which  include  significant  changes  to
bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.

The  rules  include  new  risk-based  capital  and  leverage  ratios,  which  will  be  phased  in  from  2015  to
2019, and refine the definition of what constitutes ‘‘capital’’ for purposes of calculating those ratios. The
new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Corporation and the Bank under the final rules
effective as of January 1, 2015: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital
ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a
Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The final rules also establish a ‘‘capital conservation buffer’’
above  the  new  regulatory  minimum  capital  requirements,  which  must  consist  entirely  of  common  equity
Tier  1  capital.  The  capital  conservation  buffer  will  be  phased-in  over  four  years  beginning  on  January  1,
2016,  as  follows:  the  maximum  buffer  will  be  0.625%  of  risk-weighted  assets  for  2016,  1.25%  for  2017,
1.875%  for  2018,  and  2.5%  for  2019  and  thereafter.  This  will  result  in  the  following  minimum  ratios
beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and
(iii)  a  total  capital  ratio  of  10.5%.  Under  the  final  rules,  institutions  are  subject  to  limitations  on  paying
dividends,  engaging  in  share  repurchases,  and  paying  discretionary  bonuses  if  its  capital  level  falls  below
the  buffer  amount.  These  limitations  establish  a  maximum  percentage  of  eligible  retained  income  that
could be utilized for such actions.

The final rules implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various
components  of  Tier  1  capital,  including  common  equity,  unrealized  gains  and  losses,  as  well  as  certain
instruments  that  will  no  longer  qualify  as  Tier  1  capital,  some  of  which  will  be  phased  out  over  time.
However,  the  final  rules  provide  that  small  depository  institution  holding  companies  with  less  than
$15  billion  in  total  assets  as  of  December  31,  2009  (which  includes  the  Corporation)  will  be  able  to
permanently include non-qualifying instruments that were issued and included in Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital
prior to May 19, 2010 in additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital until they redeem such instruments or until the
instruments mature.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to
place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show
signs  of  weakness.  These  revisions  took  effect  January  1,  2015.  Under  the  prompt  corrective  action
requirements,  which  are  designed  to  complement  the  capital  conservation  buffer,  insured  depository

8

institutions are required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as
‘‘well capitalized:’’ (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8%
(increased  from  6%);  (iii)  a  total  capital  ratio  of  10%  (unchanged  from  current  rules);  and  (iv)  a  Tier  1
leverage  ratio of 5% (increased from  4%).

The final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which have been
required  to  utilize  since  January  1,  2015.  The  standardized  approach  final  rule  utilizes  an  increased
number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) an alternative standard
of  creditworthiness  consistent  with  Section  939A  of  the  Dodd-Frank  Act;  (ii)  revisions  to  recognition  of
credit  risk  mitigation;  (iii)  rules  for  risk  weighting  of  equity  exposures  and  past  due  loans;  (iv)  revised
capital  treatment  for  derivatives  and  repo-style  transactions;  and  (v)  disclosure  requirements  for  top-tier
banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the ‘‘advance approach
rules’’  that  apply  to  banks  with  greater  than  $250  billion  in  consolidated  assets.  Based  on  our  current
capital composition and levels, we believe that we are in compliance with the requirements as set forth in
the final rules presently in effect.

Minimum Capital Ratios. The risk-based guidelines require all banks to maintain two ‘‘risk-weighted
assets’’ ratios. The first is a minimum ratio of total capital (‘‘Tier 1’’ and ‘‘Tier 2’’ capital) to risk-weighted
assets equal to 8.00%; the second is a minimum ratio of ‘‘Tier 1’’ capital to risk-weighted assets equal to
4.00%.  Assets  are  assigned  to  five  risk  categories,  with  higher  levels  of  capital  being  required  for  the
categories perceived as representing greater risk. In making the calculation, certain intangible assets must
be  deducted  from  the  capital  base.  The  risk-based  capital  rules  are  designed  to  make  regulatory  capital
requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and
to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.

The  risk-based  capital  rules  also  account  for  interest  rate  risk.  Institutions  with  interest  rate  risk
exposure above a normal level would be required to hold extra capital in proportion to that risk. A bank’s
exposure to declines in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates is a factor that the
banking agencies will consider in evaluating a bank’s capital adequacy. The rule does not codify an explicit
minimum  capital  charge  for  interest  rate  risk.  The  Bank  currently  monitors  and  manages  its  assets  and
liabilities for interest rate risk, and management believes that the interest rate risk rules which have been
implemented and proposed will not materially adversely affect our operations.

The ‘‘leverage’’ ratio rules require banks which are rated the highest in the composite areas of capital,
asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk to maintain a ratio of ‘‘Tier 1’’
capital  to  ‘‘adjusted  total  assets’’  (equal  to  the  bank’s  average  total  assets  as  stated  in  its  most  recent
quarterly  Call  Report  filed  with  its  primary  federal  banking  regulator,  minus  end-of-quarter  intangible
assets  that  are  deducted  from  Tier  1  capital)  of  not  less  than  3.00%.  For  banks  which  are  not  the  most
highly rated, the minimum ‘‘leverage’’ ratio will range from 4.00% to 5.00%, or higher at the discretion of
the bank’s primary federal regulator, and is required to be at a level commensurate with the nature of the
level  of  risk of the bank’s condition and  activities.

For  purposes  of  the  capital  requirements,  ‘‘Tier  1’’  or  ‘‘core’’  capital  is  defined  to  include  common
stockholders’ equity and certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus. ‘‘Tier 2’’ or
‘‘qualifying supplementary’’ capital is defined to include a bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses up to
1.25%  of  risk-weighted  assets,  plus  certain  types  of  preferred  stock  and  related  surplus,  certain  ‘‘hybrid
capital instruments’’ and certain term subordinated  debt  instruments.

Prompt Corrective Action. Federal banking law mandates certain ‘‘prompt corrective actions,’’ which
Federal  banking  agencies  are  required  to  take,  and  certain  actions  which  they  have  discretion  to  take,
based upon the capital category into which a Federally regulated depository institution falls. Regulations
have been adopted by the Federal bank regulatory agencies setting forth detailed procedures and criteria
for implementing prompt corrective action in the case of any institution that is not adequately capitalized.
Under  the  rules,  an  institution  will  be  deemed  to  be  ‘‘adequately  capitalized’’  or  better  if  it  exceeds  the

9

minimum Federal regulatory capital requirements. However, it will be deemed ‘‘undercapitalized’’ if it fails
to  meet  the  minimum  capital  requirements,  ‘‘significantly  undercapitalized’’  if  it  has  a  total  risk-based
capital ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio
that  is  less  than  3.0%,  and  ‘‘critically  undercapitalized’’  if  the  institution  has  a  ratio  of  tangible  equity  to
total  assets  that  is  equal  to  or  less  than  2.0%.  The  rules  require  an  undercapitalized  institution  to  file  a
written capital restoration plan, along with a performance guaranty by its holding company or a third party.
In  addition,  an  undercapitalized  institution  becomes  subject  to  certain  automatic  restrictions  including  a
prohibition on the payment of dividends, a limitation on asset growth and expansion, and in certain cases, a
limitation  on  the  payment  of  bonuses  or  raises  to  senior  executive  officers,  and  a  prohibition  on  the
payment  of  certain  ‘‘management  fees’’  to  any  ‘‘controlling  person’’.  Institutions  that  are  classified  as
undercapitalized  are  also  subject  to  certain  additional  supervisory  actions,  including  increased  reporting
burdens and regulatory monitoring, a limitation on the institution’s ability to make acquisitions, open new
branch  offices,  or  engage  in  new  lines  of  business,  obligations  to  raise  additional  capital,  restrictions  on
transactions with affiliates, and restrictions on interest rates paid by the institution on deposits. In certain
cases, bank regulatory agencies may require replacement of senior executive officers or directors, or sale of
the  institution  to  a  willing  purchaser.  If  an  institution  is  deemed  to  be  ‘‘critically  undercapitalized’’  and
continues in that category for four quarters, the statute requires, with certain narrowly limited exceptions,
that the institution be placed in receivership.

Based  on  management’s  assessment,  the  Bank  is  ‘‘well  capitalized’’  for  regulatory  capital  purposes.
Please see the table detailing the Bank’s compliance with minimum capital ratios, in Note 17 (‘‘Regulatory
Matters’’) to DNB’s audited financial  statements in  this  Form 10-K.

Under  the  Federal  Deposit  Insurance  Act,  the  OCC  possesses  the  power  to  prohibit  institutions
regulated  by  it,  such  as  the  Bank,  from  engaging  in  any  activity  that  would  be  an  unsafe  and  unsound
banking  practice  and  in  violation  of  the  law.  Moreover,  Federal  law  enactments  have  expanded  the
circumstances  under  which  officers  or  directors  of  a  bank  may  be  removed  by  the  institution’s  Federal
supervisory  agency;  unvested  and  further  regulated  lending  by  a  bank  to  its  executive  officers,  directors,
principal  shareholders  or  related  interests  thereof;  and  unvested  management  personnel  of  a  bank  from
serving  as  directors  or  in  other  management  positions  with  certain  depository  institutions  whose  assets
exceed  a  specified  amount  or  which  have  an  office  within  a  specified  geographic  area;  and  unvested
management  personnel  from  borrowing  from  another  institution  that  has  a  correspondent  relationship
with their bank.

Interstate  Banking.  Federal  law  permits  interstate  bank  mergers  and  acquisitions.  Limited  branch
purchases  are  still  subject  to  state  laws.  Pennsylvania  law  permits  out-of-state  banking  institutions  to
establish  branches  in  Pennsylvania  with  the  approval  of  the  Pennsylvania  Department  of  Banking  and
Securities,  provided  the  law  of  the  state  where  the  banking  institution  is  located  would  permit  a
Pennsylvania  banking  institution  to  establish  and  maintain  a  branch  in  that  state  on  substantially  similar
terms  and  conditions.  It  also  permits  Pennsylvania  banking  institutions  to  maintain  branches  in  other
states. The Dodd-Frank Act created a more permissive interstate branching regime by permitting banks to
establish  branches  de  novo  in  any  state  if  a  bank  chartered  by  such  state  would  have  been  permitted  to
establish  the  branch.  Bank  management  anticipates  that  interstate  banking  will  continue  to  increase
competitive pressures in the Bank’s market by permitting entry of additional competitors, but management
is of the opinion that this will not have a material impact upon the anticipated results of operations of the
Bank.

Bank Secrecy Act and OFAC. Under the Bank Secrecy Act (‘‘BSA’’), the Bank is required to report to
the Internal Revenue Service, currency transactions of more than $10,000 or multiple transactions of which
the  Bank  is  aware  in  any  one  day  that  aggregate  in  excess  of  $10,000.  Civil  and  criminal  penalties  are
provided under the BSA for failure to file a required report, for failure to supply information required by
the  BSA  or  for  filing  a  false  or  fraudulent  report.  The  Department  of  the  Treasury’s  Office  of  Foreign
Asset Control (‘‘OFAC’’) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions against targeted foreign

10

countries,  terrorism-sponsoring  jurisdictions  and  organizations,  and  international  narcotics  traffickers
based  on  U.S.  foreign  policy  and  national  security  goals.  OFAC  acts  under  presidential  wartime  and
national emergency powers and authority granted by specific legislation to impose controls on transactions
and freeze foreign assets under U.S. jurisdiction. Acting under authority delegated from the Secretary of
the Treasury, OFAC promulgates, develops, and administers the sanctions under its statutes and executive
orders. OFAC requirements are separate and distinct from the BSA, but both OFAC requirements and the
BSA  share  a  common  national  security  goal.  Because  institutions  and  regulators  view  compliance  with
OFAC sanctions as related to BSA compliance obligations, supervisory examination for OFAC compliance
is  typically  connected  to  examination  of  an  institution’s  BSA  compliance.  Examiners  focus  on  a  banking
organization’s  compliance  processes  and  evaluate  the  sufficiency  of  a  banking  organization’s
implementation of policies, procedures  and systems to ensure compliance  with OFAC regulations.

USA PATRIOT Act. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required
to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (together with its implementing regulations, the ‘‘Patriot
Act’’),  designed  to  deny  terrorists  and  others  the  ability  to  obtain  access  to  the  United  States  financial
system,  has  significant  implications  for  banks  and  other  financial  institutions.  It  required  DNB  and  its
subsidiary  to  implement  new  policies  and  procedures  or  amend  existing  policies  and  procedures  with
respect to, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and
due diligence on customers, as well as related matters. The Patriot Act permits and in some cases requires
information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial
institutions, as well as among financial institutions, and it requires federal banking agencies to evaluate the
effectiveness of an institution in combating money laundering activities, both in ongoing examinations and
in connection with applications for regulatory  approval.

FDIC Insurance and Assessments. The Bank’s deposits are insured to applicable limits by the FDIC.
Under  the  Dodd-Frank  Act,  the  maximum  deposit  insurance  amount  was  permanently  increased  from
$100,000 to $250,000.

The FDIC has adopted a risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments based on
an insured institution’s ranking in one of four risk categories based on their examination ratings and capital
ratios. Within its risk category, an institution is assigned an initial base assessment which is then adjusted to
determine its final assessment rate based on its level of brokered deposits, secured liabilities and unsecured
debt.

The Dodd-Frank Act required the FDIC to take such steps as necessary to increase the reserve ratio
of  the  Deposit  Insurance  Fund  from  1.15%  to  1.35%  of  insured  deposits  by  2020.  In  setting  the
assessments, the FDIC is required to offset the effect of the higher reserve ratio against insured depository
institutions with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act also broadened the
base for FDIC insurance assessments so that assessments will be based on the average consolidated total
assets less average tangible equity capital of a financial institution rather than on its insured deposits. The
FDIC  has  adopted  a  restoration  plan  to  increase  the  reserve  ratio  to  1.15%  by  September  30,  2020  with
additional rulemaking scheduled regarding the method to be used to achieve a 1.35% reserve ratio by that
date  and offset the effect on institutions with  less than $10 billion in assets.

Pursuant to these requirements, the FDIC adopted new assessment regulations effective April 1, 2011
that  redefined  the  assessment  base  as  average  consolidated  assets  less  average  tangible  equity.  Insured
banks with more than $1.0 billion in assets must calculate quarterly average assets based on daily balances
while smaller banks and newly chartered banks may use weekly averages. Average assets would be reduced
by goodwill and other intangibles. Average tangible equity equals Tier 1 capital. For institutions with more
than $1.0 billion in assets, average tangible equity is calculated on a weekly basis while smaller institutions
may use the quarter-end balance. The base assessment rate for insured institutions in Risk Category I will
range between 5 to 9 basis points and for institutions in Risk Categories II, III, and IV will be 14, 23 and
35  basis  points,  respectively.  An  institution’s  assessment  rate  will  be  reduced  based  on  the  amount  of  its
outstanding  unsecured  long-term  debt  and  for  institutions  in  Risk  Categories  II,  III  and  IV  may  be
increased based on their brokered deposits.

11

In addition to deposit insurance assessments, banks are subject to assessments to pay the interest on
Financing  Corporation  bonds.  The  Financing  Corporation  was  created  by  Congress  to  issue  bonds  to
finance  the  resolution  of  failed  thrift  institutions.  The  FDIC  sets  the  Financing  Corporation  assessment
rate  every  quarter.  The  current  annual  Financing  Corporation  assessment  rate  is  46  basis  points  on  the
deposit  insurance  assessment  base,  as  defined  above,  which  we  anticipate  will  result  in  an  aggregate
estimated FICO assessment payment  by the Bank of  $46,000 in 2018.

Other Laws and Regulations. The Bank is subject to a variety of consumer protection laws, including
the  Truth  in  Lending  Act,  the  Truth  in  Savings  Act  adopted  as  part  of  the  Federal  Deposit  Insurance
Corporation  Improvement  Act  of  1991  (‘‘FDICIA’’),  the  Equal  Credit  Opportunity  Act,  the  Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
and the regulations adopted thereunder. In the aggregate, compliance with these consumer protection laws
and regulations involves substantial expense  and administrative time on the  part of the  Bank and DNB.

Regulatory Reform and Legislation. From time to time, various legislative and regulatory initiatives are
introduced in Congress and state legislatures, as well as by regulatory agencies. Such initiatives may include
proposals  to  expand  or  contract  the  powers  of  bank  holding  companies  and  depository  institutions  or
proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change
banking statutes and the operating environment of DNB in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted,
such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities
or  affect  the  competitive  balance  among  banks,  savings  associations,  credit  unions,  and  other  financial
institutions.  DNB  cannot  predict  whether  any  such  legislation  will  be  enacted,  and,  if  enacted,  the  effect
that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on its financial condition or results of operations. A
change in statutes, regulations or regulatory  policies  applicable to DNB or our subsidiaries could have  a
material effect on our business, financial condition and results of  operations.

Effect of Government Monetary Policies. The earnings of DNB are and will be affected by domestic
economic  conditions  and  the  monetary  and  fiscal  policies  of  the  United  States  Government  and  its
agencies  (particularly  the  Federal  Reserve  Board).  The  monetary  policies  of  the  Federal  Reserve  Board
have  had  and  will  likely  continue  to  have,  an  important  impact  on  the  operating  results  of  commercial
banks  through  its  power  to  implement  national  monetary  policy  in  order,  among  other  things,  to  curb
inflation  or  combat  a  recession.  The  Federal  Reserve  Board  has  a  major  effect  upon  the  levels  of  bank
loans,  investments  and  deposits  through  its  open  market  operations  in  United  States  Government
securities  and  through  its  regulation  of,  among  other  things,  the  discount  rate  on  borrowing  of  member
banks and the reserve requirements against member bank deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature
and impact of future changes  in monetary and fiscal  policies.

Incentive  Compensation.  In  June  2010,  the  Federal  Reserve  Board,  OCC  and  FDIC  issued
comprehensive  final  guidance  on  incentive  compensation  policies  intended  to  ensure  that  the  incentive
compensation  policies  of  banking  organizations  do  not  undermine  the  safety  and  soundness  of  such
organizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The guidance, which covers all employees that have the
ability  to  materially  affect  the  risk  profile  of  an  organization,  either  individually  or  as  part  of  a  group,  is
based upon the key principles that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should
(i)  provide  incentives  that  do  not  encourage  risk-taking  beyond  the  organization’s  ability  to  effectively
identify  and  manage  risks,  (ii)  be  compatible  with  effective  internal  controls  and  risk  management,  and
(iii)  be  supported  by  strong  corporate  governance,  including  active  and  effective  oversight  by  the
organization’s board of directors.

The Federal Reserve Board will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the
incentive compensation arrangements of banking organizations, such as DNB, that are not ‘‘large, complex
banking  organizations.’’  These  reviews  will  be  tailored  to  each  organization  based  on  the  scope  and
complexity  of  the  organization’s  activities  and  the  prevalence  of  incentive  compensation  arrangements.
The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficiencies will be

12

incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the organization’s ability to make
acquisitions and take other actions. Enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its
incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose
a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective
measures to correct the deficiencies.

In addition, Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act required certain regulators (including the FDIC, SEC
and  Federal  Reserve  Board)  to  adopt  requirements  or  guidelines  prohibiting  excessive  compensation.  In
April and May 2016, the Federal Reserve, jointly with five other federal regulators, published a proposed
rule in response to Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires implementation of regulations or
guidelines  to:  (1)  prohibit  incentive-based  payment  arrangements  that  encourage  inappropriate  risks  by
certain financial institutions by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to material financial
loss,  and  (2)  require  those  financial  institutions  to  disclose  information  concerning  incentive-based
compensation arrangements to the appropriate federal  regulator.

The  proposed  rule  identifies  three  categories  of  institutions  that  would  be  covered  by  these
regulations  based  on  average  total  consolidated  assets,  applying  less  prescriptive  incentive-based
compensation program requirements to the smallest covered institutions (Level 3) and progressively more
rigorous requirements to the larger covered institutions (Level 1). Under the proposed rule, we would fall
into the smallest category (Level 3), which applies to financial institutions with average total consolidated
assets  greater  than  $1  billion  and  less  than  $50  billion.  The  proposed  rules  would  establish  general
qualitative  requirements  applicable  to  all  covered  entities,  which  would  include  (i)  prohibiting  incentive
arrangements  that  encourage  inappropriate  risks  by  providing  excessive  compensation;  (ii)  prohibiting
incentive  arrangements  that  encourage  inappropriate  risks  that  could  lead  to  a  material  financial  loss;
(iii)  establishing  requirements  for  performance  measures  to  appropriately  balance  risk  and  reward;
(iv) requiring board of director oversight of incentive arrangements; and (v) mandating appropriate record
keeping.  Under  the  proposed  rule,  larger  financial  institutions  with  total  consolidated  assets  of  at  least
$50  billion  would  also  be  subject  to  additional  requirements  applicable  to  such  institutions’  ‘‘senior
executive officers’’ and ‘‘significant risk- takers.’’ These additional requirements would not be applicable to
us because we currently have less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets. Comments on the proposed
rule were due by July 22, 2016. As of the date of this document, the final rule has not yet been published by
these regulators.

All of DNB’s revenues are attributable to customers located in the United States, and primarily from
customers located in Southeastern Pennsylvania. All of Registrant’s assets are located in the United States
and  in  Southeastern  Pennsylvania.  Registrant  has  no  activities  in  foreign  countries  and  hence  no  risks
attendant to foreign operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Investment in DNB’s Common Stock involves risk and the market price of DNB’s Common Stock may
fluctuate  significantly  in  response  to  a  number  of  factors,  including  those  that  follow.  The  following  list
contains certain risks that may be unique to DNB and to the banking industry. The following list of risks
should not be viewed as an all-inclusive list.

Changes  in  interest  rates  could  reduce  DNB’s  net  interest  margin,  net  interest  income,  fee  income  and  net
income.  —  Interest  and  fees  on  loans  and  securities,  net  of  interest  paid  on  deposits  and  borrowings,
account  for  a  significant  part  of  DNB’s  net  income.  Interest  rates  are  key  drivers  of  DNB’s  net  interest
margin  and  subject  to  many  factors  beyond  DNB’s  control.  As  interest  rates  change,  DNB’s  net  interest
income is affected. Increased interest rates in the future could result in DNB’s interest expense increasing
faster  than  interest  income  because  of  divergence  in  financial  instrument  maturities  and/or  competitive
pressures.  Because  different  types  of  assets  and  liabilities  may  react  differently  and  at  different  times  to
market interest rate changes, changes in interest rates can increase or decrease DNB’s net interest income.

13

When interest-bearing liabilities mature or re-price more quickly than interest earning assets in a period,
an  increase  in  interest  rates  would  reduce  net  interest  income.  Similarly,  when  interest  earning  assets
mature or re-price more quickly, and because the magnitude of repricing of interest earning assets is often
greater than interest bearing liabilities, falling interest rates would reduce net interest income. In addition,
substantially  higher  interest  rates  generally  reduce  loan  demand  and  may  result  in  slower  loan  growth.
Decreases  or  increases  in  interest  rates  could  have  a  negative  effect  on  the  spreads  between  the  interest
rates  earned  on  assets  and  the  rates  of  interest  paid  on  liabilities,  and  therefore  decrease  DNB’s  net
interest income. Also, changes in interest rates might also impact the values of equity and debt securities
under management and administration by DNB’s wealth management business, which may have a negative
impact on fee income.

If DNB’s allowance for credit losses is insufficient to absorb losses in its loan portfolio, DNB’s earnings could
decrease.  —  All  borrowers  carry  the  potential  to  default,  and  DNB’s  remedies  to  recover  upon  a  default
may  not  fully  satisfy  amounts  previously  loaned  by  DNB.  DNB  maintains  an  allowance  for  credit  losses,
which  is  a  reserve  established  through  a  provision  for  credit  losses  charged  to  expense,  which  represents
DNB’s best estimate of probable credit losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans.
The allowance, in DNB’s judgment, is necessary to reserve for estimated credit losses and risks inherent in
the loan  portfolio. Those risks are affected by, among other things:

(cid:127) the financial condition and cash flows  of  the borrowers  and/or the projects being financed;

(cid:127) the  changes  and  uncertainties  as  to  the  future  value  of  the  collateral,  in  the  case  of  collateralized

loans;

(cid:127) the duration of the loans in the portfolio;

(cid:127) the credit history of the particular  borrowers;  and

(cid:127) changes in economic and industry  conditions.

The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses inherently involves a high
degree  of  subjectivity  and  requires  us  to  make  significant  estimates  of  current  credit  risks  using  existing
qualitative  and  quantitative  information,  including  those  identified  above,  all  of  which  may  undergo
material changes. If DNB’s assumptions and estimates are incorrect, its allowance for credit losses may not
be  sufficient  to  cover  losses  inherent  in  its  loan  portfolio,  resulting  in  additions  to  the  allowance.  In
addition, changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers generally or certain borrowers in particular,
new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both
within  and  outside  of  DNB’s  control,  may  require  an  increase  in  the  allowance  for  credit  losses.  Bank
regulatory  authorities  periodically  review  DNB’s  allowance  for  credit  losses  and  also  may  require  us  to
increase  the  provision  for  credit  losses  or  recognize  additional  loan  charge-offs  based  on  judgments
different than DNB’s. An increase in the allowance for credit losses results in a decrease in net income and
may have a material adverse effect on  DNB’s financial  condition  and results of operations.

ASU 2016-13 will result in a significant change in how we recognize credit losses and may have a material
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. — In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2016-13, ‘‘Financial Instruments — Credit
Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,’’ which replaces the current
‘‘incurred  loss’’  model  for  recognizing  credit  losses  with  an  ‘‘expected  loss’’  model  referred  to  as  the
Current Expected Credit Loss model, or CECL. Under the CECL model, we will be required to present
certain  financial  assets  carried  at  amortized  cost,  such  as  loans  held  for  investment  and  held-to-maturity
debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is to
be  based  on  information  about  past  events,  including  historical  experience,  current  conditions,  and
reasonable  and  supportable  forecasts  that  affect  the  collectability  of  the  reported  amount.  This
measurement  will  take  place  at  the  time  the  financial  asset  is  first  added  to  the  balance  sheet  and
periodically  thereafter.  This  differs  significantly  from  the  ‘‘incurred  loss’’  model  required  under  current

14

GAAP, which delays recognition until it is probable a loss has been incurred. Accordingly, we expect that
the adoption of the CECL model will materially affect how we determine our allowance for loan losses and
could  require  us  to  significantly  increase  our  allowance.  Moreover,  the  CECL  model  may  create  more
volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses. If we are required to materially increase our level of
allowance  for  loan  and  lease  losses  for  any  reason,  such  increase  could  adversely  affect  our  business,
financial condition and results of operations.

The  new  CECL  standard  will  become  effective  for  the  Corporation  for  fiscal  years  beginning  after
December  15,  2019  and  for  interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years.  We  are  currently  evaluating  the
impact the CECL model will have on our accounting, but we expect to recognize a one-time cumulative-
effect  adjustment  to  our  allowance  for  credit  losses  as  of  the  beginning  of  the  first  reporting  period  in
which  the  new  standard  is  effective.  We  cannot  yet  determine  the  magnitude  of  any  such  one-time
cumulative adjustment or of the overall impact of the new standard on our financial condition or results of
operations.

Downgrades in U.S. Government and federal agency securities could adversely affect us. — In addition to
causing  economic  and  financial  markets  disruptions,  any  downgrades  of  U.S.  Government  and  federal
agency securities and/or failures to raise the U.S. debt limit if necessary in the future, could, among other
things,  materially  adversely  affect  the  market  value  of  the  U.S.  and  other  government  and  governmental
agency securities DNB owns, the availability of those securities for use as collateral for borrowing, and its
ability to access capital markets on favorable terms, as well as have other material adverse effects on the
operation of its business and financial results and condition. In particular, the impact of these events could
involve  increases  in  interest  rates  and  disruption  in  payment  systems,  money  markets  and  long-term  or
short-term  fixed  income  markets,  which  could  adversely  affect  the  cost  and  availability  of  funding  to  us.
Adverse consequences as a result of any downgrades also could extend to borrowers and, as a result, could
adversely affect the borrowers’ ability to repay  their  loans.

DNB’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by regional economic conditions
and real estate values. — DNB’s loan and deposit activities are largely based in eastern Pennsylvania. As a
result,  DNB’s  financial  performance  is  closely  tied  to  economic  conditions  in  this  region.  This  region
experienced deteriorating local economic conditions during 2008 through 2011, and a continued downturn
in  the  regional  real  estate  market  may  adversely  affect  us  because  DNB’s  loans  are  concentrated  in  this
regional area and a large percentage of its loans are secured by real property, and further declines in real
estate  values  reduce  the  value  of  that  loan  collateral.  This  may  limit  the  amount  DNB  may  recover  on
defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate collateral, which would adversely affect DNB’s results
of operations. In addition, a significant portion of DNB’s loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate
loans.  The  ability  of  these  borrowers  to  repay  their  loans  is  often  dependent  on  the  borrower  receiving
sufficient rental payments. Economic conditions may affect the ability of tenants to make rental payments
on a timely basis and/or may cause some tenants not to renew their leases, which may adversely affect a
borrower’s  ability  to  make  loan  payments.  In  addition,  if  operating  expenses,  taxes  and  other  expenses
associated  with  commercial  real  estate  properties  increase  materially,  the  tenant’s  ability  to  repay,  and
therefore the borrower’s ability to make timely loan payments to us, could be adversely affected. Any of
these factors could increase the amount of DNB’s non-performing loans, increase its provision for credit
losses and reduce its net income.

General  economic  conditions  and  other  events  may  adversely  affect  DNB’s  wealth  management  business
revenues.  —  A  general  economic  slowdown,  disruptions  in  the  financial  markets,  and  other  events  and
occurrences  that  impact  the  economy  could  decrease  the  value  of  the  assets  under  management  and
administration by DNB’s wealth management business, which would result in lower fee income and could
cause  clients  to  seek  alternative  investment  opportunities  with  other  wealth  management  or  financial
services providers, which could result in  reduced revenue.

15

Decreased residential mortgage origination or changes to DNB’s residential mortgage related revenues and
expenses  as  a  result  of  actions  taken  by  competitors  and  regulators  could  adversely  affect  DNB’s  results  of
operations.  —  DNB  originates  and  sells  residential  mortgage  loans.  Changes  in  interest  rates  and  pricing
decisions  by  DNB’s  competitors  in  this  market  affect  demand  for  DNB’s  mortgage  loan  products  and
revenue  DNB  realizes  on  the  sale  of  mortgage  loans,  all  of  which  impact  DNB’s  net  income.  New
regulations, increased regulatory scrutiny, changes in the structure of the secondary mortgage markets and
other factors also affect DNB’s mortgage loan business, and make it more difficult or costly to operate this
business.

DNB  may  not  be  able  to  effectively  manage  its  growth.  —  DNB’s  future  operating  results  and  financial
condition  depend  to  a  large  extent  on  its  ability  to  successfully  manage  its  growth.  DNB’s  growth  has
placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on DNB’s management and operating systems and
resources.  Whether  through  acquisitions,  organic  growth  or  a  combination  thereof,  DNB’s  ability  to
expand its business is dependent upon  its ability to:

(cid:127) continue  to  implement  and  improve  its  processes  and  systems,  including  credit  underwriting,

financial, accounting and enterprise risk management;

(cid:127) comply  with  an  increasing  number  of  new  laws,  rules  and  regulations  governing  its  business,  and

changes to existing laws, rules and regulations;

(cid:127) scale  its information technology systems; and

(cid:127) maintain appropriate staffing levels.

Addressing  issues  relating  to  DNB’s  growth  may  divert  management  from  DNB’s  existing  business
and  may  require  us  to  incur  additional  expenditures  to  expand  DNB’s  administrative  and  operational
infrastructure and, if DNB is unable to effectively manage and grow its banking franchise, including to the
satisfaction of DNB’s regulators, DNB’s business could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if
DNB  is  unable  to  manage  its  current  and  future  expansion  in  its  operations,  DNB  may  experience
compliance, operational and regulatory problems and delays, have to slow its pace of growth or even stop
its market and product expansion, or have to incur additional expenditures beyond current projections to
support  such  growth,  any  one  of  which  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  us.  If  DNB  experiences
difficulties  with  the  development  of  new  business  activities  or  the  integration  process  of  acquired
businesses, the anticipated benefits of any particular acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may
take longer to realize than expected. Additionally, DNB may be unable to recognize synergies, operating
efficiencies and/or expected benefits within expected timeframes and cost projections, or at all. DNB also
may not be able to preserve the goodwill of an acquired financial institution. DNB’s growth could lead to
increases  in  its  legal,  audit,  administrative  and  financial  compliance  costs,  which  could  materially  and
adversely affect us.

DNB may need to raise additional capital in the future and such capital may not be available when needed or at
all. — DNB may need to raise additional capital in the future to provide us with sufficient capital resources
and  liquidity  to  meet  its  commitments  and  business  needs.  DNB’s  ability  to  raise  additional  capital,  if
needed,  will  depend  on,  among  other  things,  conditions  in  the  capital  markets  at  that  time,  which  are
outside of DNB’s control, and its financial performance. DNB’s customary sources of liquidity include, but
are  not  limited  to,  deposits,  inter-bank  borrowings,  repurchase  agreements  and  borrowings  from  the
Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  of  Pittsburgh.  Any  occurrence  that  may  limit  DNB’s  access  to  the  capital
markets, such as a decline in the confidence of debt purchasers, depositors or counterparties participating
in  the  capital  markets  may  adversely  affect  DNB’s  capital  costs  and  ability  to  raise  capital  and,  in  turn,
DNB’s  liquidity.  An  inability  to  raise  additional  capital  on  acceptable  terms  when  needed  could  have  a
material adverse effect on DNB’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

16

DNB faces strong competition for clients and this competition could affect DNB’s operating results. — DNB
operates  in  a  highly  competitive  market  and  experiences  competition  in  DNB’s  market  from  both  banks
and a variety of other financial institutions. DNB competes with commercial banks, credit unions, savings
and  loan  associations,  mortgage  banking  firms,  consumer  finance  companies,  securities  brokerage  firms,
insurance  companies,  money  market  funds,  and  other  mutual  funds,  as  well  as  other  community,  super-
regional,  national,  and  international  financial  institutions  that  operate  offices  in  DNB’s  primary  market
areas  and  elsewhere.  DNB  competes  with  these  institutions  both  in  attracting  deposits  and  in  making
loans. Many financial service providers believe DNB’s primary market is an attractive market because of its
strong  economic  growth.  As  a  result,  DNB  is  experiencing  particularly  intense  competition  in  DNB’s
primary marketplace. While DNB’s strategy is to attract customers by providing personalized services and
making use of the business and personal ties of DNB’s management, there is no assurance DNB will keep
or  increase  market  acceptance  and  be  able  to  operate  profitably.  Many  of  DNB’s  competitors  are
well-established, larger financial institutions. These institutions offer some services, such as extensive and
established  branch  networks,  that  DNB  does  not  provide.  There  are  also  a  number  of  other  community
banks  in  its  market  that  share  its  general  marketing  focus.  There  is  a  risk  that  DNB  will  not  be  able  to
compete successfully with other financial institutions in its market, and that DNB may have to pay higher
interest rates to attract deposits, which could result in reduced profitability. In addition, competitors that
are not depository institutions are generally not subject to the extensive regulations that apply to us. All of
these factors may adversely impact DNB’s ability  to  maintain  or increase profitability.

DNB  depends  on  its  executive  officers  and  key  personnel,  and  DNB’s  ability  to  operate  its  business  and
implement its strategy depends significantly on DNB’s ability to attract and retain individuals with experience and
relationships  in  the  markets  in  which  DNB  operates  and  intends  to  expand.  —  DNB  believes  that  its  future
success, including the implementation of its strategy, will depend in large part on the skills of its executive
management team and ability to motivate and retain these and other key personnel and attract and retain
new personnel with expertise and relationships in the markets DNB now serves and intends to serve. The
loss  of  service  of  one  or  more  of  DNB’s  executive  officers  or  key  personnel,  its  inability  to  replace
departing  personnel  and/or  its  ability  to  hire  new  personnel  to  implement  DNB’s  strategy  could  limit
DNB’s  growth  and  could  materially  adversely  affect  DNB’s  business,  financial  condition,  and  results  of
operations. Competition for qualified candidates is intense, and DNB cannot assure you that DNB will be
able to retain and recruit management  and other key personnel to meet its needs.

implement  provisions  of  the  Dodd-Frank  Act  prohibiting 

Potential  limitations  on  incentive  compensation  contained  in  proposed  federal  agency  rulemaking  may
adversely affect our ability to attract and retain our highest performing team members. — In April 2011 and May
2016,  the  Federal  Reserve,  other  federal  banking  agencies  and  the  SEC  jointly  published  proposed  rules
designed  to 
incentive  compensation
arrangements  that  would  encourage  inappropriate  risk  taking  at  covered  financial  institutions,  which
includes  a  bank  or  bank  holding  company  with  $1  billion  or  more  in  assets,  such  as  DNB.  It  cannot  be
determined at this time whether or when a final rule will be adopted and whether compliance with such a
final rule will substantially affect the manner in which we structure compensation for our executives and
other  employees.  Depending  on  the  nature  and  application  of  the  final  rules,  we  may  not  be  able  to
successfully compete with certain financial institutions and other companies that are not subject to some or
all of the rules to retain and attract executives and other high performing employees. If this were to occur,
relationships  that  we  have  established  with  our  clients  may  be  impaired  and  our  business,  financial
condition and results of operations could be adversely  affected, perhaps materially.

New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risk. — From time to time,
DNB may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within its existing lines of
business.  There  may  be  substantial  risks  and  uncertainties  associated  with  these  efforts,  particularly  in
instances where the markets for those new lines of business or new products or services are not yet fully
developed.  DNB  may  invest  significant  time  and  resources  in  developing  and  marketing  new  lines  of
business  and/or  new  products  and  services.  DNB’s  anticipated  timetables  for  the  development  and

17

introduction  of  new  lines  of  business  and/or  new  products  or  services  may  not  be  achieved,  and  DNB’s
price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. In addition, external factors, such as compliance with
regulations,  competitive  alternatives,  and  shifting  market  preferences,  may  also  impact  development  and
implementation of a new line of business and/or a new product or service. Any new line of business and/or
new  product  or  service  also  could  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  effectiveness  of  DNB’s  system  of
internal controls. If DNB fails to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation
of new lines of business and/or new products or services, DNB’s business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely  affected.

The  fair  value  of  DNB’s  investment  securities  can  fluctuate  due  to  market  conditions  which,  under  some
circumstances  can  lead  to  other-than-temporary  impairment.  —  As  of  December  31,  2017,  the  fair  value  of
DNB’s  investment  securities  portfolio  was  approximately  $174.2  million.  Factors  beyond  DNB’s  control
can significantly influence the fair value of DNB’s investment securities and can result in adverse changes
to their fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, rating agency actions with respect to the
securities, defaults by the issuer or with respect to any underlying securities, and changes in market interest
rates  and  instability  in  the  capital  markets.  These  and  other  factors  could  cause  other-than-temporary
impairments and realized and/or unrealized losses in future periods and declines in other comprehensive
income,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  us.  The  process  for  determining  whether
impairment  of  a  security  is  other-than-temporary  typically  requires  complex,  subjective  judgments  about
the  future  financial  performance  and  liquidity  of  the  issuer  and  any  collateral  underlying  the  security  in
order to assess the probability of receiving all contractual principal and interest payments on the security.

Changes to estimates and assumptions DNB makes in preparing its financial statements could adversely affect
its operating results, reported assets and liabilities, financial condition and capital levels. — The preparation of
DNB’s  financial  statements  requires  management  to  make  certain  critical  accounting  estimates  and
assumptions  that  could  affect  DNB’s  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  income  and  expense
during  the  reporting  periods.  Changes  to  those  estimates  or  assumptions  could  materially  affect  its
operating results, reported assets and  liabilities, financial  condition  and capital levels.

If  DNB  lost  a  significant  portion  of  its  low-cost  deposits,  it  would  negatively  impact  its  liquidity  and
profitability.  —  DNB’s  profitability  depends  in  part  on  DNB’s  success  in  attracting  and  retaining  a  stable
base  of  low-cost  deposits.  While  DNB  generally  does  not  believe  these  core  deposits  are  sensitive  to
interest rate fluctuations, the competition for these deposits in DNB’s markets is strong and customers are
increasingly seeking investments that are safe, including the purchase of U.S. Treasury securities and other
government-guaranteed  obligations,  as  well  as  the  establishment  of  accounts  at  the  largest,  most-well
capitalized  banks.  If  DNB  were  to  lose  a  significant  portion  of  its  low-cost  deposits,  it  would  negatively
impact its liquidity and profitability.

Changes in accounting standards and policies can be difficult to predict and can materially affect how DNB
records and reports its financial results. — DNB’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how
DNB  records  and  reports  its  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations.  The  regulatory  bodies  that
establish accounting standards, including, among others, the Financial Accounting, or FASB, and the SEC,
periodically revise or issue new financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of
its financial statements. These changes, and the effects of these changes, can be difficult to predict and can
materially  impact  how  DNB  records  and  reports  its  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations.  DNB
could  be  required  to  apply  new  or  revised  guidance  retrospectively,  which  may  result  in  the  revision  of
prior period financial statements by material amounts. The implementation of new or revised accounting
guidance could have a material adverse  effect  on its reported financial results.

In  addition,  DNB  must  exercise  judgment  in  appropriately  applying  many  of  its  accounting  policies
and methods so they comply with generally accepted accounting principles. In some cases, DNB may have
to  select  a  particular  accounting  policy  or  method  from  two  or  more  alternatives.  In  some  cases,  the
accounting policy or method chosen might be reasonable under the circumstances and yet might result in

18

its reporting materially different amounts than would have been reported if DNB had selected a different
policy or method. Accounting policies are critical to fairly presenting DNB’s financial condition and results
of operations and may require us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are
uncertain.

If DNB fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, its business could be adversely affected. —
DNB  is  dependent  upon  maintaining  an  effective  system  of  internal  controls  to  provide  reasonable
assurance  that  transactions  and  activities  are  conducted  in  accordance  with  established  policies  and
procedures and are all captured and reported in the financial statements. Any system of internal controls,
however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and expectations of employee
conduct and can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met.
Any  failure  to  maintain  an  effective  system  of  internal  controls,  any  failure  to  adhere  to  those  internal
controls,  or  any  circumvention  of  DNB’s  controls  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  its  operations,
net  income,  financial  condition,  reputation  and  compliance  with  laws  and  regulations.  Any  failure  to
maintain an effective internal control environment could impact our ability to report our financial results
on an accurate and timely basis, which could result in regulatory actions, loss of investor confidence, and
an adverse impact on our business operations and  stock price.

Technological  systems  failures,  interruptions  and  security  breaches  could  negatively  impact  DNB’s
operations. — Communications and information systems are essential to the conduct of DNB’s business, as
DNB uses such systems to manage its customer relationships, its general ledger, its deposits, and its loans.
While  DNB  has  established  policies  and  procedures  to  prevent  or  limit  the  impact  of  systems  failures,
interruptions, and security breaches, DNB cannot assure you that such events will not occur or that they
will  be  adequately  addressed  if  they  do  occur.  In  addition,  any  compromise  of  DNB’s  security  systems
could  deter  customers  from  using  DNB’s  website  and  DNB’s  online  banking  service,  which  involve  the
transmission of confidential information. Although DNB relies on commonly-used security and processing
systems to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these
precautions  may  not  protect  its  systems  from  compromises  or  breaches  of  security.  In  addition,  DNB
outsources certain of its data processing to third-party providers. If DNB’s third-party providers encounter
difficulties, or if DNB has difficulty in communicating with them, DNB’s ability to adequately process and
account  for  customer  transactions  could  be  affected,  and  DNB’s  business  operations  could  be  adversely
impacted.  Threats  to  information  security  also  exist  in  the  processing  of  customer  information  through
various other vendors and their personnel. The occurrence of any systems failure, interruption, or breach
of security could damage DNB’s reputation and result in a loss of customers and business, could subject us
to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability. Any of
these  occurrences  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  DNB’s  financial  condition  and  results  of
operations.

Additionally,  financial  products  and  services  have  become  increasingly  technology-driven.  DNB’s
ability  to  meet  the  needs  of  its  customers  competitively,  and  in  a  cost-efficient  manner,  is  dependent  on
DNB’s  ability  to  keep  pace  with  technological  advances  and  to  invest  in  new  technology  as  it  becomes
available. Many of DNB’s competitors have greater resources to invest in technology than DNB does and
may be better equipped to market new technology-driven products and services. If DNB fails to keep pace
with technological change, it could have a material  adverse impact on DNB’s  business.

Loss of, or failure to adequately safeguard, confidential or proprietary information may adversely affect DNB’s
operations,  financial  performance  or  reputation.  —  DNB  regularly  collects,  processes,  transmits  and  stores
significant  amounts  of  confidential  information  regarding  its  customers,  employees  and  others.  This
information is necessary for DNB to conduct its business activities, including the ongoing maintenance of
deposit, loan, investment management and other account relationships for DNB’s customers, and receiving
instructions  and  completing  transactions  for  DNB’s  customers  and  other  users  of  DNB’s  products  and
services.  In  addition,  DNB  compiles,  processes,  transmits  and  stores  proprietary,  non-public  information

19

concerning  its  business,  operations,  plans  and  strategies.  In  some  cases,  this  confidential  or  proprietary
information  is  collected,  compiled,  processed,  transmitted  or  stored  by  third  parties  on  DNB’s  behalf.
Information  security  risks  have  generally  increased  in  recent  years  because  of  the  proliferation  of  new
technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks. A failure in or
breach  of  DNB’s  operational  or  information  security  systems,  or  those  of  DNB’s  service  providers,  as  a
result of cyber-attacks, information security breaches or otherwise could adversely affect its business, result
in the disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage DNB’s reputation, increase
DNB’s  costs  and/or  cause  losses.  If  this  confidential  or  proprietary  information  were  to  be  mishandled,
misused,  improperly  disclosed  or  lost,  DNB  could  be  exposed  to  significant  regulatory  consequences,
reputational damage, civil litigation and financial loss. Although DNB employs a variety of safeguards to
protect  this  confidential  and  proprietary  information  from  mishandling,  misuse,  improper  disclosure  or
loss, DNB cannot assure you that these safeguards will be effective in every instance, or that if mishandling,
misuse, improper disclosure or loss of the information did occur, those events would be promptly detected
and addressed. Additionally, as information security risks and cyber threats continue to evolve, DNB may
be  required  to  expend  additional  resources  to  continue  to  enhance  its  information  security  measures
and/or to investigate and remediate any  information security vulnerabilities.

Employee errors or misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm
DNB’s  reputation.  —  Errors  or  misconduct  by  DNB’s  employees  could  adversely  impact  DNB’s  business.
Employee  misconduct  could  include  hiding  unauthorized  activities  from  us,  improper  or  unauthorized
activities on behalf of customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to
prevent  employee  errors  and  misconduct,  and  the  precautions  DNB  takes  to  prevent  and  detect  this
activity  may  not  be  effective  in  all  cases.  Employee  errors  could  also  subject  us  to  financial  claims  for
negligence.  Although  DNB  maintains  a  system  of  internal  controls  and  insurance  coverage  to  mitigate
operational  risks,  including  employee  errors  and  customer  or  employee  fraud,  should  those  internal
controls  fail  to  prevent  or  detect  errors  or  improper  actions,  or  if  any  resulting  loss  is  not  insured  or
exceeds applicable insurance limits, DNB’s business  and  reputation could be adversely affected.

Environmental risks associated with DNB’s lending activities could adversely affect its financial condition and
results  of  operations.  —  A  significant  portion  of  DNB’s  loan  portfolio  is  secured  by  real  property.  In  the
course  of  its  business,  DNB  may  own  or  foreclose  on  and  take  title  to  real  estate,  which  could  result  in
DNB’s  being  subject  to  environmental  liabilities  with  respect  to  these  properties.  DNB  may  become
responsible to a governmental agency or third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation
and clean-up costs incurred by those parties in connection with environmental contamination, or DNB may
be  required  to  investigate  or  clean-up  hazardous  or  toxic  substances,  or  chemical  releases  at  a  property.
The  costs  associated  with  environmental  investigation  or  remediation  activities  could  be  substantial.  If
DNB were to become subject to significant environmental liabilities, it could have a material adverse effect
on DNB’s financial condition and results of operations.

Severe  weather,  natural  disasters,  acts  of  war  or  terrorism  and  other  external  events  could  adversely  affect
DNB’s business. — A variety of events over which DNB has no control, including severe weather, natural
disasters, acts of war or terrorism and others could have a significant adverse effect on its business. Events
such  as  these  could  affect  the  stability  of  its  deposit  base,  impair  the  ability  of  borrowers  to  repay
outstanding  loans,  impair  the  value  of  collateral  securing  loans,  cause  significant  damage  to  properties
funded by DNB’s loans, result in loss of revenue and/or cause us  to  incur additional  expenses.

Potential additional acquisitions in the future may disrupt DNB’s business and dilute shareholder value. —
DNB may pursue additional acquisitions of other financial institutions in the future as part of its growth
strategy.  As  a  result,  DNB  may  engage  in  negotiations  or  discussions  that,  if  they  were  to  result  in  a
transaction, could have a material effect on its business, operating results and financial condition. In any
acquisition,  DNB  may  pay  for  the  acquisition  through  the  payment  of  cash,  the  issuance  of  its  common
stock or other securities, or a combination thereof. Depending on the size of the acquisition, the amount

20

DNB pays may be material. Using cash in connection with any acquisition could materially affect DNB’s
cash resources or require us to incur indebtedness. Using shares of common stock as payment could dilute
the ownership interest of current shareholders. In addition, the required accounting treatment for certain
acquisitions  could  result  in  us  having  to  recognize  a  charge  against  earnings,  which  could  materially  and
adversely  affect  DNB’s  results  of  operations  during  the  period  in  which  the  charge  is  recognized.  In
addition,  if  goodwill  recorded  in  connection  with  our  prior  or  potential  future  acquisitions  were
determined to be impaired, then we would be required to recognize a charge against our earnings, which
could materially and adversely affect our results of operations during the period in which the impairment
was recognized. Any potential charges for impairment related to goodwill would not directly impact cash
flow or tangible capital.

Acquisition  activities  generally  involve  a  number  of  additional  risks  and  potential  effects  on  us  and

DNB’s business, including:

(cid:127) the  time  and  expense  associated  with  identifying  and  evaluating  potential  acquisitions  and
negotiating  potential  transactions,  including  the  diversion  of  management  resources  from  the
operation of DNB’s existing business;

(cid:127) the time and expense necessary to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired company;

and

(cid:127) difficulties relating to the conversion of operational, financial, accounting and customer data of the

acquired company onto its systems.

DNB may not be successful in addressing the risks and inherent challenges in completing acquisitions.
DNB may lose key employees, experience disruption of DNB’s business and customer relationships, incur
unexpected  costs  and  face  a  variety  of  other  unanticipated  challenges,  any  of  which  could  result  in  not
achieving the anticipated benefits of an acquisition. If DNB is not able to successfully identify and address
the risks and challenges associated with acquisitions, its business may be harmed and its financial position
and results of operations could be materially  and adversely affected.

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future, which could limit the growth of
DNB’s business. — DNB’s future growth may depend, in part, on its ability to expand its business through
additional  acquisitions  of  other  financial  institutions  in  the  future.  DNB  expects  that  other  banking  and
financial service companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than us, will compete with
us  in  seeking  to  complete  such  acquisitions.  This  could  decrease  out  chances  of  growing  through
acquisitions  and  increase  prices  for  potential  acquisition  opportunities  that  DNB  believes  are  attractive.
Also,  DNB’s  acquisitions  are  subject  to  various  regulatory  approvals.  If  DNB  fails  to  receive  the
appropriate  regulatory  approvals  for  a  proposed  acquisition,  DNB  will  not  be  able  to  complete  a
transaction which DNB believes to be in its best interests. DNB’s regulators consider its capital, liquidity,
profitability,  regulatory  compliance  and  levels  of  goodwill  and  intangibles,  among  other  factors,  when
considering  DNB’s  acquisition  and  expansion  proposals.  If  DNB  is  unable  to  pursue  and  complete
acquisitions, its ability to grow its business  could be adversely affected.

DNB  operates  in  a  highly  regulated  environment,  and  the  laws  and  regulations  that  govern  its  operations,
changes in those laws and regulations, or its failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, could materially
and adversely affect us. — DNB is subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and legislation that govern
almost all aspects of its operations. These are intended to protect customers, depositors and the FDIC’s
Deposit Insurance Fund and not shareholders. Among other things, these laws and regulations prescribe
minimum  capital  requirements,  impose  limitations  on  its  business  activities,  limit  the  dividends  or
distributions that DNB can pay, restrict the ability of DNB First to engage in transactions with DNB, and
impose  certain  specific  accounting  requirements  on  us  that  may  be  more  restrictive  and  may  result  in
greater  or  earlier  charges  to  earnings  or  reductions  in  its  capital  than  GAAP.  Compliance  with  laws  and
regulations  can  be  difficult  and  costly,  and  changes  to  laws  and  regulations  often  impose  additional

21

compliance  costs,  and  may  make  certain  business  practices  or  products  impermissible  or  uneconomic.
DNB’s  failure  to  comply  with  these  laws  and  regulations,  even  if  the  failure  follows  good  faith  effort  or
reflects a difference in interpretation, could subject us to restrictions on its business activities, reputational
harm,  fines  and  other  penalties,  any  of  which  could  materially  and  adversely  affect  us.  Further,  any  new
laws,  rules  and  regulations  could  make  compliance  more  difficult  or  expensive  and  also  materially  and
adversely affect us.

Our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects could be adversely affected by the
highly regulated environment in which we operate. — As a bank holding company, we are subject to federal
supervision and regulation. Federal regulation of the banking industry, along with tax and accounting laws,
regulations, rules and standards, may limit our operations significantly and control the methods by which
we conduct business, just as they limit those of other banking organizations. In addition, compliance with
laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations can impose additional
compliance costs. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the ‘‘Dodd-Frank
Act’’), which imposes significant regulatory and compliance changes on financial institutions, is an example
of this type of federal regulation. Many of these regulations are intended to protect depositors, customers,
the  public,  the  banking  system  as  a  whole,  or  the  FDIC  insurance  funds,  not  stockholders.  Regulatory
requirements and discretion affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend
policy and many other aspects of our business. There are laws and regulations which restrict transactions
between  us  and  our  subsidiaries.  These  requirements  may  constrain  our  operations,  and  the  adoption  of
new  laws  and  changes  to  or  repeal  of  existing  laws  may  have  a  further  impact  on  our  business,  financial
condition, results of operations and future prospects. Also, the burden imposed by those federal and state
regulations  may  place  banks  in  general,  including  our  Bank  in  particular,  at  a  competitive  disadvantage
compared  to  their  non-banking  competitors.  We  are  also  subject  to  requirements  with  respect  to  the
confidentiality  of  information  obtained  from  clients  concerning  their  identities,  business  and  personal
financial information, employment, and other matters. We require our personnel to agree to keep all such
information confidential and we monitor compliance. Failure to comply with confidentiality requirements
could result in material liability and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and future prospects.

Bank  holding  companies  and  financial  institutions  are  extensively  regulated  and  currently  face  an
uncertain regulatory environment. Applicable laws, regulations, interpretations, enforcement policies and
accounting  principles  have  been  subject  to  significant  changes  in  recent  years,  and  may  be  subject  to
significant  future  changes.  Future  changes  may  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  our  business,  financial
condition and results of operations.

Federal and state regulatory agencies may adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in
which  existing  regulations  are  applied.  We  cannot  predict  the  substance  or  effect  of  pending  or  future
legislation or regulation or the application of laws and regulations to DNB. Compliance with current and
potential  regulation,  as  well  as  regulatory  scrutiny,  may  significantly  increase  our  costs,  impede  the
efficiency  of  our  internal  business  processes,  require  us  to  increase  our  regulatory  capital,  and  limit  our
ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner by requiring us to expend significant time,
effort  and  resources  to  ensure  compliance  and  respond  to  any  regulatory  inquiries  or  investigations.  In
addition,  press  coverage  and  other  public  statements  that  assert  some  form  of  wrongdoing  by  financial
services companies (including press coverage and public statements that do not involve us) may result in
regulatory  inquiries  or  investigations,  which,  independent  of  the  outcome,  may  be  time-consuming  and
expensive and may divert time, effort and resources from our business. Evolving regulations and guidance
and  concerning  executive  compensation  may  also  impose  limitations  on  us  that  affect  our  ability  to
compete successfully for executive and management talent.

22

In  addition,  given  the  current  economic  and  financial  environment,  regulators  may  elect  to  alter
standards  or  the  interpretation  of  the  standards  used  to  measure  regulatory  compliance  or  to  determine
the  adequacy  of  liquidity,  certain  risk  management  or  other  operational  practices  for  financial  services
companies in a manner that impacts our ability to implement our strategy and could affect us in substantial
and unpredictable ways, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results  of  operations.  Furthermore,  the  regulatory  agencies  have  extremely  broad  direction  in  their
interpretation  of  the  regulations  and  laws  and  their  interpretation  of  the  quality  of  our  loan  portfolio,
securities  portfolio  and  other  assets.  If  any  regulatory  agency’s  assessment  of  the  quality  of  our  assets,
operations, lending practices, investment practices, capital structure or other assets of our business differs
from our assessment, we may be required to take additional charges or undertake or refrain from taking
actions that would have the effect of materially reducing our earning,  capital ratios and share  price.

New capital rules that were recently issued generally require insured depository institutions and certain holding
companies  to  hold  more  capital.  The  impact  of  the  new  rules  on  DNB’s  financial  condition  and  operations  is
uncertain. — In July 2013, U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies issued final rules that substantially amended
the  regulatory  risk-based  capital  rules  applicable  to  DNB  and  DNB  First.  The  new  rules  revise,  among
other things, risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk weighted assets to make
those  standards  consistent  with  agreements  that  were  reached  by  Basel  III  and  certain  provisions  of  the
Dodd-Frank Act. Certain requirements of the rule began to phase in on January 1, 2015 and the remaining
requirements of the rule will be phased by January 1, 2019. The new rules include certain new and higher
risk-based capital and leverage requirements than those currently in place. In addition, in order to avoid
restrictions on capital distributions (including dividends) or discretionary bonus payments to executives, a
covered  banking  organization  must  maintain  a  ‘‘capital  conservation  buffer’’  on  top  of  its  minimum
risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer will be phased in incrementally over time,
becoming  fully  effective  on  January  1,  2019.  Furthermore,  in  the  current  economic  and  regulatory
environment,  bank  regulators  may  impose  capital  requirements  that  are  more  stringent  than  those
required by applicable existing regulations. The application of more stringent capital requirements for us
could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity, require the raising of additional capital, and
result in regulatory actions if DNB were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Implementation
of  changes  to  asset  risk  weightings  for  risk  based  capital  calculations,  items  included  or  deducted  in
calculating regulatory capital or additional capital conservation buffers, could result in modifications to its
business  strategy  and  could  limit  its  ability  to  make  distributions,  including  paying  dividends  or
repurchasing  its  shares.  In  December  2017,  the  Basel  Committee  on  Banking  Supervision  published
standards that it described as the finalization of the Basel III regulatory framework (commonly referred to
as Basel IV). Among other things, these standards revise the Basel Committee’s standardized approach for
credit  risk  and  provide  a  new  standardized  approach  for  operational  risk  capital.  Under  the  Basel
framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor
phasing  in  through  January  1,  2027.  Under  the  current  U.S.  capital  rules,  operational  risk  capital
requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced  approaches institutions, and not to DNB or the
Bank. The impact of Basel IV on us will depend on the manner in which it is implemented by the federal
bank regulators.

The FDIC’s restoration plan and the related increased assessment rate could materially and adversely affect
us.  —  The  FDIC  insures  deposits  at  FDIC-insured  depository  institutions,  including  DNB  First,  up  to
applicable  limits.  The  amount  of  a  particular  institution’s  deposit  insurance  assessment  is  based  on  that
institution’s  risk  classification  under  an  FDIC  risk-based  assessment  system.  An  institution’s  risk
classification  is  assigned  based  on  certain  factors,  including  capital  levels  and  the  level  of  supervisory
concern  regulators  believe  the  institution  poses.  Market  developments  have  significantly  depleted  the
FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF, and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. As a result of
recent economic conditions and the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has increased the deposit
insurance assessment rates and thus raised deposit insurance premiums for insured depository institutions.
If  these  increases  are  insufficient  for  the  DIF  to  meet  its  funding  requirements,  there  may  need  to  be

23

further special assessments or increases in deposit insurance premiums. DNB is generally unable to control
the amount of premiums that DNB is required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional bank or
financial institution failures, DNB may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently
increased levels. Any future additional assessments, increases or required prepayments in FDIC insurance
premiums may materially and adversely affect us, including by reducing DNB’s profitability or limiting its
ability to pursue certain business opportunities.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may reshape consumer financial laws through rulemaking and
enforcement of unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, which may directly impact DNB’s business practices relating
to consumer financial products or services. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, has broad
rulemaking  authority  to  administer  and  carry  out  the  purposes  and  objectives  of  the  ‘‘Federal  consumer
financial laws, and to prevent evasions thereof,’’ with respect to all financial institutions that offer financial
products  and  services  to  consumers.  The  CFPB  is  also  authorized  to  prescribe  rules  applicable  to  any
covered person or service provider identifying and prohibiting acts or practices that are ‘‘unfair, deceptive,
or  abusive’’  in  connection  with  any  transaction  with  a  consumer  for  a  consumer  financial  product  or
service,  or  the  offering  of  a  consumer  financial  product  or  service  (‘‘UDAP  authority’’).  The  potential
reach  of  the  CFPB’s  broad  new  rulemaking  powers  and  UDAP  authority  on  the  operations  of  financial
institutions offering consumer financial products or  services,  including  us, is currently unknown.

DNB First is subject to federal and state and fair lending laws and failure to comply with these laws could lead
to  material  penalties.  —  Federal  and  state  fair  lending  laws  and  regulations,  such  as  the  Equal  Credit
Opportunity  Act  and  the  Fair  Housing  Act,  impose  nondiscriminatory  lending  requirements  on  financial
institutions.  The  Department  of  Justice,  CFPB,  and  other  federal  and  state  agencies  are  responsible  for
enforcing these laws and regulations. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution’s
performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. A successful challenge to DNB First’s
performance under the fair lending laws and regulations could adversely impact DNB First’s rating under
the Community Reinvestment Act and result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment
of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on merger and acquisition
activity and restrictions on expansion activity, which could negatively impact DNB’s reputation, business,
financial condition and results of operations.

DNB faces a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money
laundering  statutes  and  regulations.  —  The  Bank  Secrecy  Act,  the  Uniting  and  Strengthening  America  by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of  2001 (the ‘‘PATRIOT
Act’’) and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, including us, to institute and maintain
an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports as
appropriate. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, established by the Treasury Department
to administer the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations
of  those  requirements,  and  has  recently  engaged  in  coordinated  enforcement  efforts  with  the  individual
federal  banking  regulators,  as  well  as  the  Justice  Department,  Drug  Enforcement  Administration  and
Internal  Revenue  Service.  There  is  also  increased  scrutiny  of  compliance  with  the  rules  enforced  by  the
Office  of  Foreign  Assets  Control  (the  ‘‘OFAC’’).  If  its  policies,  procedures  and  systems  are  deemed
deficient,  DNB  would  be  subject  to  liability,  including  fines  and  regulatory  actions,  including  possible
restrictions on DNB’s ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed
with certain aspects of its business plan, which could materially and adversely affect us. Failure to maintain
and  implement  adequate  programs  to  combat  money  laundering  and  terrorist  financing  could  also  have
serious reputational consequences for us.

24

DNB’s share price may change for a variety of reasons, some of which are beyond DNB’s control. — DNB’s
share price can fluctuate in response to a variety of factors, some of which are not under DNB’s control.
These factors could cause the share price to decrease regardless of DNB’s operating results. These factors
include:

(cid:127) DNB’s financial condition, performance, creditworthiness and prospects;

(cid:127) DNB’s past and future dividend practice;

(cid:127) operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors;

(cid:127) quarterly variations in DNB’s operating results  or in the quality of DNB’s assets;

(cid:127) operating  results  and  securities  price  performance  of  companies  that  investors  believe  are

comparable to us;

(cid:127) the  credit,  mortgage  and  housing  markets,  the  markets  for  securities  relating  to  mortgages  or

housing, and developments with respect to financial institutions  generally;

(cid:127) future  sales of DNB’s equity or equity-related securities;

(cid:127) changes  in  global  financial  markets  and  global  economies  and  general  market  conditions,  such  as
interest or foreign exchange rates, stock, commodity or real estate valuations or volatility and other
geopolitical, regulatory or judicial events; and

(cid:127) ineffective internal controls over financial reporting

In addition, DNB’s share price can be affected by the level of trading in its common stock. The trading
volume for the common stock has historically been less than that of larger financial services companies. In
light of the relatively low trading volume, significant sales of its common stock in the public market, or the
perception that those sales may occur, could cause the trading price of the common stock to decline or to
be lower than it otherwise might be in the absence of those  sales  or perceptions.

DNB  may  sell  additional  shares  of  its  common  stock  or  other  securities  that  are  convertible  into  or
exchangeable for its common stock, which may adversely affect the market price of DNB’s common stock. — DNB
is  not  restricted  from  issuing  additional  shares  of  common  stock  or  other  securities,  including  securities
that may be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of its common stock. Some of these securities may
have distribution rights in connection with liquidation or other rights, including dividend and voting rights,
senior  to  the  rights  of  DNB’s  common  stock.  The  future  issuance  of  shares  of  common  stock  or  other
securities  could  have  a  dilutive  effect  on  the  holders  of  DNB’s  common  stock.  Additionally,  the  market
value  of  DNB’s  common  stock  could  decline  as  a  result  of  sales  by  us  of  a  large  number  of  shares  of
common stock or other securities or  the perception that such sales could occur.

Provisions in DNB’s articles of incorporation and bylaws may inhibit a takeover of us, which could discourage
transactions  that  would  otherwise  be  in  the  best  interests  of  DNB’s  shareholders  and  could  entrench
management.  —  Provisions  of  DNB’s  amended  and  restated  articles  of  incorporation  and  amended  and
restated bylaws, and applicable provisions of Pennsylvania law may delay, inhibit or prevent someone from
gaining control of its business through a tender offer, business combination, proxy contest or some other
method even though some shareholders might believe  a change in control  is desirable.

DNB relies on dividends from DNB First for most of DNB’s revenue. — DNB is a bank holding company
and its operations are conducted by DNB’s subsidiaries from which DNB receives dividends. The ability of
DNB’s  subsidiaries  to  pay  dividends  is  subject  to  legal  and  regulatory  limitations,  profitability,  financial
condition,  capital  expenditures  and  other  cash  flow  requirements.  The  ability  of  DNB  First  to  pay  cash
dividends to DNB is limited by its obligation to maintain sufficient capital and by other restrictions on its
cash dividends that are applicable to banks. If DNB First is not permitted to pay cash dividends to DNB, it
is unlikely that DNB would be able to  pay cash dividends on  its common  stock.

25

Combining  the  two  companies  may  be  more  difficult,  costly  or  time-consuming  than  expected  and  the
anticipated benefits and cost savings of the merger may not be realized. — The challenges involved in combining
the operations of DNB and ERB include, among other things, integrating personnel with diverse business
backgrounds, combining different corporate cultures, and retaining key employees. It is possible that the
integration  process  could  result  in  the  loss  of  key  employees  or  disruption  of  each  company’s  ongoing
business  or  inconsistencies  in  standards,  controls,  procedures  and  policies  that  adversely  affect  DNB’s
ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the
merger.  The  integration  of  the  two  companies  will  require  the  experience  and  expertise  of  certain  key
employees of ERB who are expected to be retained by DNB. DNB may not be successful in retaining these
employees for the time period necessary to successfully integrate ERB’s operations with those of DNB. In
addition, as with any merger of banking institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause us to
lose  customers  or  cause  customers  to  take  their  deposits  out  of  DNB.  The  success  of  the  combined
company  following  the  merger  may  depend  in  large  part  on  the  ability  to  integrate  the  two  businesses,
business  models  and  cultures.  DNB  may  not  be  able  to  successfully  achieve  the  level  of  cost  savings,
revenue  enhancements,  and  other  anticipated  synergies,  and  may  not  be  able  to  capitalize  upon  the
existing customer relationships of ERB to the extent anticipated, or it may take longer, or be more difficult
or  expensive  than  expected  to  achieve  these  goals.  If  DNB  is  not  able  to  integrate  the  companies’
operations successfully and in a timely manner, the expected benefits of the merger may not be realized,
and this could have an adverse effect  on DNB’s  business, results of operation and  stock price.

Goodwill Impairment may adversely impact our results of operations. — Impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results
of  operations.  Under  current  accounting  standards,  goodwill  and  certain  other  intangible  assets  with
indeterminate  lives  are  no  longer  amortized  but,  instead,  are  evaluated  for  impairment  periodically  or
when  impairment  indicators  are  present.  Evaluation  of  goodwill  and  such  other  intangible  assets  could
result  in  circumstances  where  the  applicable  intangible  asset  is  deemed  to  be  impaired  for  accounting
purposes. Under such circumstances, the intangible asset’s impairment would be reflected as a charge to
earnings in the period during which such impairment is identified. Management reviewed the requirements
of  the  qualitative  assessments  listed  in  ASC  350-20-35-3C,  and  resultantly  identified  nine  qualitative
assessments  that  are  relevant  to  the  general  banking  industry  and  specifically  to  DNB.  These  qualitative
assessments  were  intended  to  isolate  change  factors  which  would  contribute  to  the  increased  risk  of
impairment of goodwill. The qualitative factors were then used to compare base year levels with current
levels  to  identify  potential  change  factors  which  could  contribute  to  the  increased  risk  of  impairment  of
goodwill. Based on the results of this analysis, it is more likely than not that the fair value of reporting unit
as  of  the  date  of  this  report  is  higher  than  its  book  value  and,  therefore,  goodwill  is  considered  not
impaired and no further testing is required  pursuant to ASC Topic 350-20.

There  is  no  assurance  that  we  will  be  successful  in  overcoming  these  risks  or  any  other  problems
encountered  in  connection  with  pending  or  potential  acquisitions.  Our  inability  to  overcome  these  risks
could  have  an  adverse  effect  on  our  levels  of  reported  net  income,  ROE  and  ROA,  and  our  ability  to
achieve our business strategy and maintain our market value.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

26

Item 2.

Properties

As  of  December  31,  2017,  DNB  owns  or  leases  15  full-service  branch  locations,  two  of  which
additionally  serve  as  other  administrative  offices.  The  following  tables  detail  DNB’s  properties  as  of
December 31, 2017:

Banking Office

Boothwyn
Caln
Chadds Ford
Downingtown
East End
East Falls
Exton*
Kennett Square
Lionville
Little Washington
Ludwig’s Corner
Old City
Roxborough
West  Chester*
West  Goshen

Other Administrative Offices
Downingtown
Downingtown
West  Chester

* Wealth Management Office

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

Office  Location

Owned/Leased

3915  Chichester Avenue, Boothwyn,  PA 19061
1835 East Lincoln Highway, Coatesville,  PA 19320
300 Oakland Road, West Chester, PA 19382
4 Brandywine Avenue, Downingtown, PA 19335
701 East Lancaster  Avenue,  Downingtown, PA 19335
4341  Ridge Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19129
410 Exton Square Parkway, Exton, PA 19341
215 East  Cypress Street, Kennett Square,  PA  19348
891 Pottstown Pike, Exton, PA 19341
104 Culbertson  Run  Road, Downingtown, PA 19335
1030 North  Pottstown  Pike, Chester Springs,  PA  19425
36 North 3rd Street, Philadelphia,  PA 19106
6137  Ridge Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19128
124 West Market Street,  West  Chester,  PA  19380
1115 West Chester Pike, West Chester, PA 19380

4 Brandywine Avenue, Downingtown, PA 19335
104 Brandywine Avenue,  Downingtown, PA 19335
124 West  Market  Street, West Chester, PA 19380

Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Leased

Owned
Leased
Leased

Neither the Corporation nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to, nor is any of their property the subject
of,  any  material  pending  legal  proceedings  other  than  ordinary  routine  litigation  incidental  to  their
business.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

27

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,  Related  Stockholder Matters  and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

(a) Market Price of and Dividends on Registrant’s  Common Equity

DNB  Financial  Corporation’s  common  stock,  par  value  $1.00  per  share,  is  listed  for  trading  on
Nasdaq’s  Capital  Market  under  the  symbol  DNBF.  Current  price  information  is  available  from  account
executives  at  most  brokerage  firms  as  well  as  the  firms  listed  at  the  back  of  this  report  who  are  market
makers of DNB’s common stock. There were approximately 600 holders of record who owned 4.3 million
shares of common stock outstanding at March 12, 2018. Quarterly high and low sales prices are set forth in
the following table:

First  quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter

High

$34.93
35.15
35.38
35.05

2017
Low

$27.82
30.70
30.27
32.38

Dividend High

$0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07

$29.40
29.50
26.47
28.95

2016
Low

$27.95
23.05
23.71
25.01

Dividend

$0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07

The information required with respect to the frequency and amount of DNB’s cash dividends declared
on  each  class  of  its  common  equity  for  the  two  most  recent  fiscal  years  is  set  forth  in  the  section  of  this
report titled, ‘‘Item 6 — Selected Financial Data’’ and incorporated herein by reference.

See  also  the  discussion  under  ‘‘5.  Certain  Regulatory  Matters’’  of  ‘‘Management’s  Discussion  and
Analysis  of  Results  of  Operations’’  for  further  information  regarding  limitations  on  our  ability  to  pay
dividends.

The  information  required  with  respect  to  securities  authorized  for  issuance  under  DNB’s  equity
compensation  plans  is  set  forth  in  ‘‘Item  12  —  Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and
Management and Related Stockholder  Matters’’, and incorporated herein by reference.

(b) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

(c) Purchases of Equity Securities by  DNB  and  Affiliated Purchasers

The  following  table  provides  information  on  repurchases  by  or  on  behalf  of  DNB  or  any  ‘‘affiliated
purchaser’’  (as  defined  in  Regulation  10b-18(a)  (3))  of  its  common  stock  in  each  month  of  the  quarter
ended December 31, 2017.

Period

October 1, 2017 – October 31,  2017
November 1, 2017 – November 30,  2017
December 1, 2017 –  December 31, 2017

Total

Total Number Average

Of Shares
Purchased

Total  Number of Maximum Number
Shares Purchased of  Shares that  May
as  Part  of  Publicly Yet Be Purchased
Price Paid Announced Plans Under  the Plans or
Per  Share

or  Programs

Programs

—
—
—

—

$—
—
—

$—

—
—
—

—

63,016
63,016
63,016

63,016

On July 25, 2001, DNB authorized the buyback of up to 175,000 shares of its common stock over an
indefinite period. On August 27, 2004, DNB increased the buyback from 175,000 to 325,000 shares of its
common stock over an indefinite period.

28

(d) Corporation Performance Graph

The  following  graph  presents  the  5  year  cumulative  total  return  on  DNB  Financial  Corporation’s
common  stock,  compared  to  the  S&P  500  Index  and  the  S&P  500  Financial  Index  for  the  5  year  period
ended December 31, 2017. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested in DNB’s common stock and
each  of the foregoing indices and that  all  dividends  have been reinvested.

CORPORATION PERFORMANCE
COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG DNB FINANCIAL CORP.,  the S&P  500 INDEX and  the S&P  500 FINANCIAL INDEX

S
R
A
L
L
O
D

250.00

200.00

150.00

100.00

50.00

0.00

Dec-12

Dec-13

Dec-14

Dec-15

Dec-16

Dec-17

S&P 500 INDEX

S&P 500 FINANCIAL INDEX

DNB FINANCIAL CORP.
15MAR201803391961

29

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data set forth below is derived in part from, and should be read in conjunction

with, the Consolidated Financial Statements  and Notes thereto, contained elsewhere herein.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest  income
Interest  expense

Net  interest income

Provision for  credit losses

Non-interest  income

Non-interest  expense

Income before income taxes

Income tax  expense

Net  income

Preferred stock dividends & accretion of discount

Net  income  available to common stockholders

PER  SHARE DATA
Basic  earnings
Diluted  earnings
Cash dividends
Book value
Tangible  book value (Non-GAAP)
Average  common shares outstanding
Average  diluted common shares outstanding

PERFORMANCE RATIOS
Return on  average assets
Return on  average stockholders’ equity
Return on  average tangible equity (Non-GAAP)
Net  interest margin
Efficiency ratio
Wtd average  yield on earning assets

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total  assets
Total  liabilities
Total  stockholders’ equity
Loans, gross
Allowance for credit losses
Investment  securities
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Deposits
Borrowings

ASSET  QUALITY RATIOS
Net  charge-offs to average loans
Non-performing loans/total loans
Non-performing assets/total assets
Allowance for credit loss/total loans
Allowance for credit loss/non-performing loans

CAPITAL RATIOS
Total  equity/total assets
Tangible  equity/tangible assets
Tier 1  leverage ratio
Common  equity tier 1 risk based capital ratio
Tier 1  risk based capital ratio
Total  risk based capital ratio

At or For the Year Ended December 31
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

$

$

$

43,385
5,720

37,665

1,660

5,418

28,021

13,402

5,456

7,946

—

7,946

$

$

$

29,179
3,324

25,855

730

6,364

24,641

6,848

1,869

4,979

—

4,979

$

$

$

24,478
2,712

21,766

1,105

5,009

19,029

6,641

1,503

5,138

50

5,088

$

$

$

23,596
2,311

21,285

1,130

4,958

18,632

6,481

1,677

4,804

135

4,669

$

$

$

23,212
2,888

20,324

2,530

4,795

17,450

5,139

1,220

3,919

148

3,771

$

1.87
1.85
0.28
23.78
20.06
4,260,137
4,290,070

$

1.56
1.55
0.28
22.36
18.56
3,186,079
3,218,884

$

1.82
1.79
0.28
19.65
19.58
2,801,881
2,847,488

$

1.69
1.66
0.28
18.33
18.26
2,766,723
2,812,726

$

1.38
1.36
0.28
16.55
16.47
2,742,417
2,780,752

0.74%
7.93
9.44
3.73
63.75
4.28

0.59%
7.40
9.74
3.31
75.53
3.72

0.69%
8.72
8.73
3.16
68.31
3.51

0.71%
7.78
7.79
3.36
71.12
3.67

0.60%
6.75
6.77
3.30
69.29
3.76

$1,081,915
979,973
101,942
845,897
5,843
174,173
15,525
435
861,203
112,803

$1,070,685
975,845
94,840
817,529
5,373
182,206
15,590
537
885,187
86,668

$ 748,818
693,330
55,488
481,758
4,935
220,208
—
66
606,275
81,909

$ 723,330
659,422
63,908
455,603
4,906
231,656
—
82
605,083
49,005

$ 661,473
602,890
58,583
415,354
4,623
186,958
—
111
558,747
39,674

0.15%
0.89
1.16
0.69
77.36

9.42%
8.07
9.19
10.71
11.80
13.73

0.05%
1.04
1.05
0.66
63.20

8.86%
7.46
8.42
9.60
10.67
12.50

0.23%
1.06
1.02
1.02
96.91

7.41%
7.40
8.94
10.44
12.08
14.78

0.19%
1.50
1.07
1.08
71.59

8.84%
8.82
10.55
10.50
14.90
15.92

1.20%
1.38
1.03
1.11
80.70

8.86%
8.84
10.61
10.51
15.35
16.40

30

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and  Analysis  of Financial  Condition and  Results  of Operations

I.

Introductory Overview

DNB  is  a  bank  holding  company  whose  bank  subsidiary,  the  Bank,  is  a  nationally  chartered
commercial bank with trust powers, and a member of the FDIC. DNB provides a broad range of banking
services  to  individual  and  corporate  customers  through  its  fifteen  community  offices  located  throughout
Chester,  Delaware,  and  Philadelphia  Counties,  Pennsylvania.  DNB  is  a  community  banking  organization
that  focuses  its  lending  and  other  services  on  businesses  and  consumers  in  the  local  market  area.  DNB
funds all these activities with retail and business deposits and borrowings. Through its Wealth Management
Group, the Bank provides wealth management and trust services to individuals, businesses and non-profit
organizations.  The  Bank  and  its  subsidiary,  DNB  Investments  and  Insurance,  make  available  certain
non-depository  products  and  services,  such  as  securities  brokerage,  mutual  funds,  life  insurance  and
annuities.

DNB  earns  revenues  and  generates  cash  flows  by  lending  funds  to  commercial  and  consumer
customers  in  its  marketplace.  DNB  generates  its  largest  source  of  interest  income  through  its  lending
function.  A  secondary  source  of  interest  income  is  DNB’s  investment  portfolio,  which  provides  liquidity
and cash flows for future lending needs.

In  addition  to  interest  earned  on  loans  and  investments,  DNB  earns  revenues  from  fees  it  charges
customers  for  non-lending  services.  These  services  include  wealth  management  and  trust  services;
brokerage  and  investment  services;  cash  management  services;  banking  and  ATM  services;  as  well  as
safekeeping and other depository services.

To  ensure  we  remain  well  positioned  to  meet  the  growing  needs  of  our  customers  and  communities
and  to  meet  the  challenges  of  the  21st  century,  we’ve  worked  to  build  awareness  of  our  full-service
capabilities and ability to meet the needs of a wide range of customers. This served to not only retain our
existing  customer  base,  but  to  position  ourselves  as  an  attractive  financial  institution  on  which  younger
individuals  and  families  can  build  their  dreams.  To  that  end,  DNB  continues  to  make  appropriate
investments in all areas of our business, including  people, technology, facilities  and marketing.

Non-GAAP Based Financial Measures

Our  selected  financial  data  contains  non-GAAP  financial  measures  calculated  using  non-GAAP
amounts.  These  measures  are  tangible  book  value  per  common  share  and  return  on  average  tangible
equity.  Tangible  book  value  per  share  adjusts  the  numerator  by  the  amount  of  Goodwill  and  Other
Intangible  Assets  (reduction  of  Shareholders’  Equity).  Return  on  average  tangible  equity  adjusts  the
denominator by the amount of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (reduction of Shareholders’ Equity).
Management  uses  non-GAAP  measures  to  present  historical  periods  comparable  to  the  current  period
presentation. In addition, management believes the use of non-GAAP measures provides additional clarity
when  assessing  our  financial  results  and  use  of  equity.  Disclosures  of  this  type  should  not  be  viewed  as
substitutes  for  results  determined  to  be  in  accordance  with  U.S.  GAAP,  nor  are  they  necessarily
comparable to non-GAAP performance  measures that may  be  presented by  other  entities.

31

Reconciliation of Book Value Per Common Share to  Tangible Book Value  Per Common Share
(In thousands, except share and per share  data)

Stockholders’ Equity
Goodwill
Other intangible assets

Tangible common equity (Non-GAAP)
Outstanding shares
Book value per common share (GAAP)
Tangible book value per common share (Non-GAAP)

Return on Average Tangible Equity (Non-GAAP)
(Dollars  in  thousands)

Average Stockholders’ Equity
Average goodwill
Average other intangible assets

Average tangible stockholders’ equity (Non-GAAP)
Return on average tangible equity (Non-GAAP)

Tax equivalent interest on tax-exempt investment  securities (Non-GAAP)
(Dollars  in  thousands)

Interest on tax exempt investment securities  (GAAP)
Tax  adjustment

Tax  equivalent interest on tax-exempt investment  securities (Non-GAAP)

Tax equivalent interest and fees on loans (Non-GAAP)
(Dollars  in  thousands)

Interest and fees on loans (GAAP)
Tax  adjustment

Tax  equivalent interest and fees on loans (Non-GAAP)

32

December 31

2017

2016

$ 101,942
15,525
435

$

$

85,982
4,286,117
23.78
20.06

$

94,840
15,590
537

$

$

78,713
4,240,778
22.36
18.56

For the year
ended
December 31
2017

2016

$100,212
15,540
485

$67,100
15,590
537

$ 84,187

$50,973

9.44%

9.74%

For the year
ended
December 31
2016
2017

$ 938
478

$1,210
615

$1,416

$1,825

For the year
ended
December 31
2016
2017

$39,254
254

$24,944
366

$39,508

$25,310

Highlights of DNB’s results for the year-end December 31, 2017  include:

(cid:127) For  the  year  ending  December  31,  2017,  net  income  was  $7.9  million,  or  $1.85  per  diluted  share,
compared with $5.0 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, for the same period, last year. For the year
ended December 31, 2017 results were impacted by a $1.8 million charge, or $0.43 per diluted share,
to  adjust  deferred  taxes  due  to  the  enactment  of  the  Tax  Cuts  and  Jobs  Act.  This  Act  reduced
corporate income tax rates from 34% to 21%, leading management to revalue its net Deferred Tax
Assets,  effective  as  of  December  22,  2017.  On  October  1,  2016  DNB  completed  its  acquisition  of
East River Bank and its results of operations are included in the consolidated results for the fourth
quarter of 2016 and the full year ended  December  31, 2017.

(cid:127) Asset  quality  remained  solid  as  non-performing  assets,  including  loans  and  other  real  estate
property,  were  $12.6  million  as  of  December  31,  2017,  or  1.16%  of  total  assets,  compared  with
$11.3 million as of December 31, 2016, or 1.05%  of  total assets.

(cid:127) DNB  continued  its  focus  on  growing  fee-based  income.  Wealth  Management  recorded  a  strong
growth  in  total  assets  under  care,  which  increased  18.02%  to  $252.8  million  as  of  December  31,
2017, from $214.2 million as of December 31, 2016. This growth contributed to a $79,000 or 4.83%
increase  in  Wealth  Management  fees,  which  represented  approximately  32%  of  total  non-interest
income for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(cid:127) Capital ratios continue to exceed minimum regulatory standards for well-capitalized institutions. As
of December 31, 2017, the tier 1 leverage ratio was 9.19%, the tier 1 risk-based capital was 11.80%,
the common equity tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 10.71% and the total risk-based capital ratio
was 13.73%.

DNB is particularly exposed to downturns in the greater Philadelphia region as well as the global and
U.S.  economies.  Starting  in  the  2007-2008  time  period,  a  weak  economy,  coupled  with  declines  in  the
housing  market  and  elevated  unemployment  negatively  impacted  the  credit  performance  of  mortgage,
construction and other loans and resulted in significant write-downs by many financial institutions across
the  U.S.  In  addition,  the  values  of  real  estate  collateral  supporting  many  loans  declined.  While  certain
economic conditions in the U.S. have shown some improvement over the last eight years, economic growth
has been slow and uneven as consumers continue to recover from previously high unemployment rates and
lower  housing  valuations.  In  addition,  high  levels  of  U.S.  government  debt,  as  well  as  economic  and
political  conditions  in  the  global  markets  may  impact  DNB’s  borrowers  negatively.  Unfavorable  general
economic trends, reduced availability of commercial credit and a sustained low Labor Force Participation
rate, can negatively impact the credit performance of both consumer and commercial credits, resulting in
increased  write-downs.  A  worsening  of  these  conditions,  such  as  an  economic  slowdown  or  recession,
would  likely  worsen  the  adverse  effects  of  these  difficult  market  conditions  on  DNB  and  other  financial
institutions.

In  addition,  DNB’s  net  interest  margin  has  been  impacted  by  these  changes  in  the  economy.
Management  has  been  aggressive  in  managing  DNB’s  cost  of  funds  during  the  year  by  implementing
carefully planned pricing strategies, designed to offset the effects of a flattening yield curve, while matching
liquidity needs. Our composite cost of funds for 2017 was 0.73%, compared to 0.53% in 2016. DNB’s net
interest  margin  increased  significantly  to  3.78%  in  2017  from  3.31%  in  2016.  The  increased  net  interest
margin was primarily caused by the higher volume and higher yield of interest-earning assets in 2017, over
2016, coupled with a higher rate environment and increased recognition of fair value marks on acquired
loans, year over year.

Earnings.  For  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  DNB  reported  net  income  available  to  common
shareholders  of  $7.9  million,  an  increase  of  $3.0  million  from  $5.0  million  reported  for  the  year  ended
December  31,  2016,  or  $1.85  per  diluted  share  versus  $1.55  per  diluted  share,  respectively.  DNB’s  2016
results include the operations of the former East River Bank for the fourth quarter of 2016, a $1.2 million

33

gain from insurance proceeds associated with a fire at one of DNB’s offices during the second quarter of
2015, as well as $2.2 million of due diligence and merger related costs associated with its acquisition of East
River Bank.

Asset  Quality.  Non-performing  assets  were  $12.6  million  at  December  31,  2017  compared  to
$11.3  million  at  December  31,  2016.  Non-performing  assets  as  of  December  31,  2017  were  comprised  of
$7.5 million of non-accrual loans, $54,000 of loans delinquent over ninety days and still accruing, as well as
$4.8  million  of  Other  Real  Estate  Owned  (‘‘OREO’’)  and  $177,000  in  other  repossessed  property.  As  of
December 31, 2017, the non-performing loans to total loans ratio decreased to 0.89% compared to 1.04%
at December 31, 2016. The non-performing assets to total assets ratio increased to 1.16% at December 31,
2017,  compared  to  1.05%  at  December  31,  2016.  The  allowance  for  credit  losses  was  $5.8  million  at
December  31,  2017,  compared  to  $5.4  million  at  December  31,  2016.  The  allowance  to  total  loans  was
0.69% at December 31, 2017 compared to 0.66% at December 31, 2016. Loans acquired in connection with
the purchase of East River have been recorded at fair value based on an initial estimate of expected cash
flows, including a reduction for estimated credit losses, and without carryover of the respective portfolio’s
historical allowance for loan losses. DNB’s delinquency ratio (the total of all delinquent loans plus loans
greater than 90 days and still accruing, divided by total loans) was 1.07% at December 31, 2017, down from
1.60% at December 31, 2016.

II. Overview of Financial Condition — Major Changes  and Trends

At  December  31,  2017,  DNB  had  consolidated  assets  of  $1.1  billion  and  a  Tier  I/Leverage  Capital
Ratio of 9.19%. Loans comprise 81.4% of earning assets, while investments and overnight funds constitute
the  remainder.  Assets  increased  $11.2  million  to  $1.08  billion  at  December  31,  2017,  compared  to
$1.07 billion at December 31, 2016. During the same period, investment securities decreased $8.0 million
to  $174.2  million,  while  the  loan  portfolio  increased  $28.4  million,  or  3.47%,  to  $845.9  million.  Deposits
decreased $24.0 million to $861.2 million at December 31, 2017. DNB’s liabilities are comprised of a high
level  of  core  deposits  with  a  low  cost  of  funds,  in  addition  to  a  moderate  level  of  brokered  deposits  and
borrowings with costs that are more volatile than core deposits.

Comprehensive 5-Year Plan. During the third quarter of 2017, management updated the 5-year strategic
plan  that  was  designed  to  reposition  its  balance  sheet  and  improve  core  earnings.  Through  the  plan,
management  will  endeavor  to  expand  its  loan  portfolio  through  new  originations,  increased  loan
participations, as well as strategic loan and lease purchases. Management also plans to reduce the absolute
level of borrowings and brokered deposits with cash flows from existing loans and investments as well as
from new core deposit growth. A discussion  on DNB’s Key  Strategies follows:

(cid:127) Focus on penetrating existing markets  to  maximize profitability;

(cid:127) Grow loans and diversify the mix;

(cid:127) Improve asset quality;

(cid:127) Focus on profitable customer segments;

(cid:127) Grow  and  diversify  non-interest  income,  primarily  wealth  management,  origination  and  sales  of

SBA guaranteed loans and mortgage  banking;

(cid:127) Continue to grow core deposits to  maintain low  funding costs;

(cid:127) Focus on cost containment and improving  operational efficiencies;  and

(cid:127) Continue to engage employees to help them become  more effective and successful.

34

Strategic Plan Update.

For  the  year  ending  December  31,  2017,  net  income  was  $7.9  million,  or  $1.85  per  diluted  share,
compared with $5.0 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, for the same period, last year. Results for the year
ended  December  31,  2017  were  impacted  by  a  $1.8  million  charge,  or  $0.43  per  diluted  share,  to  adjust
deferred taxes due to the enactment of  the Tax Cuts and  Jobs Act in December 2017.

The  weighted  average  rate  paid  for  interest-bearing  liabilities  was  0.73%  and  0.53%  for  the  years
ending  December  31,  2017  and  December  31,  2016,  respectively.  The  increase  in  the  composite  cost  of
funds  was  due  largely  to  increases  in  short  term  rates,  precipitated  by  the  Federal  Reserve’s  rate  hikes,
which  has impacted the rates we pay  on  the majority of our non-maturity deposit accounts.

As of December 31, 2017, total assets were $1.1 billion, which was relatively unchanged from year-end,
2016. Total annual loan growth of $28.4 million, or 3.47%, was partially offset by an $8.0 million, or 4.41%
decline  in  investment  securities  and  an  $11.2  million,  or  50.61%,  decrease  in  cash  and  cash  equivalents.
Total deposits decreased $24.0 million, or 2.71%. As of December 31, 2017, total stockholders’ equity was
$101.9 million, compared with $94.8 million as of December 31, 2016. Book value per share was $23.78 as
of December 31, 2017, compared with $22.36 as of December 31, 2016. Tangible book value per share was
$20.06 as of December 31, 2017, compared  with $18.56  as of December 31, 2016.

Over  the  past  12  months,  DNB’s  commercial  mortgage  lending  portfolio  increased  $19.4  million,  or
4.16%, commercial term loans grew $6.4 million, or 5.16%, and commercial construction loans increased
$2.3 million, or 3.10%. At December 31, 2017, commercial loans totaled $689.4 million and were 81.50% of
total loans.

The  allowance  for  credit  losses  at  December  31,  2017  was  $5.8  million  compared  to  $5.4  million  at
December 31, 2016. The $470,000 increase was primarily due to a $1.7 million provision and $135,000 in
recoveries,  offset  by  $1.3  million  in  charge-offs.  The  allowance  as  a  percentage  of  total  loans  and  leases
increased  to  0.69%  at  December  31,  2017,  compared  to  0.66%  at  December  31,  2016.  At  December  31,
2017, the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of originated loans, which represents all loans other
than  those  acquired,  was  1.00%.  Included  in  non-performing  assets  is  $5.0  million  in  other  real  estate
owned  and  other  repossessed  property  (OREO)  and  $7.6  million  in  non-performing  loans.  The  level  of
non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 0.89% as of December 31, 2017, as compared to 1.04% at
December  31,  2016.  Our  coverage  ratio,  defined  as  the  allowance  for  credit  losses  as  a  percentage  of
non-performing loans increased to 77.36% on December 31, 2017, compared to 63.20% at December 31,
2016.

DNB’s most significant revenue source continues to be net interest income, defined as total interest
income less total interest expense, which in 2017 accounted for approximately 87.42% of total revenue. To
produce net interest income and consistent earnings growth over the long-term, DNB must generate loan
and deposit growth at acceptable economic spreads within its market area. To generate and grow loans and
deposits,  DNB  must  focus  on  a  number  of  areas  including,  but  not  limited  to,  the  economy,  branch
expansion,  sales  practices,  customer  satisfaction  and  retention,  competition,  customer  behavior,
technology, product innovation and credit performance of its customers.

Management has made a concerted effort to improve the measurement and tracking of business lines
and overall corporate performance levels. Improved information systems have increased DNB’s ability to
track  key  indicators  and  enhance  corporate  performance  levels.  Better  measurement  against  goals  and
objectives  and  increased  accountability  will  be  integral  in  attaining  desired  loan,  deposit  and  fee  income
production.

III. DNB’s Principal Products and Services

Loans  and  Lending  Services.  DNB’s  primary  source  of  earnings  and  cash  flows  is  derived  from  its
lending function. The commercial loan portfolio amounted to $689.4 million or 81.50% of total loans as of

35

December 31, 2017. DNB focuses on providing these products to small to mid-size businesses throughout
Chester,  Delaware,  and  Philadelphia  Counties.  In  keeping  with  DNB’s  goal  to  match  customer  business
initiatives with products designed to meet their needs, DNB offers a wide variety of fixed and variable rate
loans  that  are  priced  competitively.  DNB  serves  this  market  by  providing  funds  for  the  purchase  of
business property or ventures, working capital lines, Small Business Administration loans, lease financing
for equipment and for a variety of other purposes.

As a community bank, DNB also serves consumers by providing home equity and home mortgages, as
well  as  term  loans  for  the  purchase  of  consumer  goods.  Residential  mortgage  and  consumer  loans
increased $367,000 in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily in the residential mortgage portfolio. In addition
to  providing  funds  to  customers,  DNB  also  provides  a  variety  of  services  to  its  commercial  customers.
These services, such as cash management, remote capture, commercial sweep accounts, internet banking,
letters  of  credit  and  other  lending  services  are  designed  to  meet  our  customer  needs  and  help  them
become  successful.  DNB  provides  these  services  to  assist  its  customers  in  obtaining  financing,  securing
business opportunities, providing access  to  new resources and managing cash  flows.

Deposit  Products  and  Services.  DNB’s  primary  source  of  funds  is  derived  from  customer  deposits,
which  are  typically  generated  by  DNB’s  fifteen  banking  offices.  DNB’s  deposit  base,  while  highly
concentrated in central Chester County, extends to southern Chester County and into parts of Delaware,
Lancaster, and Philadelphia Counties. In addition, a growing amount of new deposits are being generated
through  expanded  government  service  offerings  and  as  a  part  of  comprehensive  loan  or  wealth
management  relationships.  DNB  also  has  access  to  wholesale  brokered  deposits  which  amounted  to
$41.8 million at December 31, 2017.

The  majority  of  DNB’s  deposit  mix  consists  of  low  costing  deposits,  (demand,  NOW  and  savings
accounts). The remaining deposits are comprised of rate-sensitive money market and time products. DNB
offers  tiered  savings  and  money  market  accounts,  designed  to  attract  high  dollar,  less  volatile  funds.
Certificates  of  deposit  and  IRAs  are  traditionally  offered  with  interest  rates  commensurate  with  their
terms.

Non-Deposit Products and Services. DNB offers non-deposit products and services under the names
‘‘DNB  Investments  &  Insurance’’  and  ‘‘DNB  First  Investment  Management  &  Trust.’’  Revenues  from
these entities were $1.7 million and $1.6 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

DNB Investments & Insurance. Through a third party marketing agreement with Cetera Investment
Services, LLC, DNB Investments & Insurance offers a complete line of investment and insurance products,
which  include the following:

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

Fixed & Variable Annuities

401(k) Rollovers

Self-Directed  and Managed IRAs

(cid:127) Mutual Funds

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

Long Term Care Insurance

Life Insurance

(cid:127) Disability Insurance

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

401(k) plans

Stocks

Bonds

Full Services Brokerage/Cash Management

529  College Savings Plans

Separately Managed Investment Accounts (SMA)

Self Employed Pension (SEP)

36

DNB First Investment Management & Trust. DNB First Investment Management & Trust offers a full

line of investment and fiduciary services,  which includes  the following:

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

Investment Management

Estate Settlement

Custody Services

Corporate Trustee / Trust
Administration

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

(cid:127)

IV. Material Challenges, Risks and  Opportunities

A.

Interest Rate Risk Management.

Investment Advisory

Client  Bill  Paying

Financial Planning

Power of Attorney and Guardian  of the Estate
Capacities

Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest
rates.  DNB  considers  interest  rate  risk  a  predominant  risk  in  terms  of  its  potential  impact  on  earnings.
Interest  rate  risk  can  occur  for  any  one  or  more  of  the  following  reasons:  (a)  assets  and  liabilities  may
mature  or  re-price  at  different  times;  (b)  short-term  or  long-term  market  rates  may  change  by  different
amounts; or (c) the remaining maturity of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest
rates change.

The  principal  objective  of  DNB’s  interest  rate  risk  management  is  to  evaluate  the  interest  rate  risk
included in certain on and off balance sheet accounts, determine the level of risk appropriate given DNB’s
business  strategy,  operating  environment,  capital  and  liquidity  requirements  and  performance  objectives,
and  manage  the  risk  consistent  with  approved  guidelines.  Through  such  management,  DNB  seeks  to
reduce  the  vulnerability  of  its  operations  to  changes  in  interest  rates.  DNB’s  Asset  Liability  Committee
(the ‘‘ALCO’’) is responsible for reviewing DNB’s asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position and
making decisions involving asset liability considerations. The ALCO meets on a monthly basis and reports
trends and DNB’s interest rate risk position to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. The extent of
the movement of interest rates is an uncertainty that could have a negative impact on DNB’s earnings. (See
additional  discussion  in  Item  7a.  Quantitative  and  Qualitative  Disclosures  About  Market  Risk  of  this
Form 10-K.)

1. Net  Interest Margin

DNB’s net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income to average interest-earning assets. Unlike
the  interest  rate  spread,  which  measures  the  difference  between  the  rates  on  earning  assets  and  interest
paying liabilities, the net interest margin measures that spread plus the effect of net free funding sources.
This  is  a  more  meaningful  measure  of  profitability  because  a  bank  can  have  a  narrow  spread  but  a  high
level of equity and non-interest-bearing deposits, resulting in a higher net interest margin. One of the most
critical  challenges  DNB  faced  over  the  last  several  years  was  the  impact  of  historically  low  interest  rates
and a narrower spread between short-term  rates and long-term  rates as noted in the  following tables.

Prime
Federal Funds Sold (‘‘FFS’’)
5 Year US Treasury
10 Year US Treasury

2017

4.50%
1.50
2.18
2.40

Historical Rates
December 31
2014
2015

2016

2013

2012

3.75% 3.50% 3.25% 3.25% 3.25%
0.25
0.75
1.89
1.96
2.46
2.49

0.50
1.71
2.25

0.25
0.95
1.97

0.25
1.83
3.15

37

FFS to 5 year US Treasury
FFS to 10 year US Treasury

2017

0.68%
0.90

Historical Yield Spread
December 31
2014
2015

2016

2013

2012

1.21% 1.21% 1.64% 1.58% 0.70%
2.21
1.74

1.75

2.90

1.72

In general, financial institutions price their fixed rate loans off of 5 and 10 year treasuries and price
their deposits off of shorter indices, like the Federal Funds Sold rate. As you can see in the table above, the
spread  between  the  Federal  Funds  Sold  rate  and  the  5  year  treasury  has  ranged  from  0.68%  to  1.64%
during  the  last  6  years.  The  spread  between  the  Federal  Funds  Sold  rate  and  the  10  year  treasury  has
ranged from 0.90% to 2.90% during the last 6 years. As a result of the compression between long and short
term  rates,  many  banks,  including  DNB,  have  seen  their  net  interest  margin  fluctuate  during  the  last
6 years.

The  following  table  provides,  for  the  periods  indicated,  information  regarding:  (i)  DNB’s  average
balance sheet; (ii) the total dollar amounts of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resulting
average  yields  (tax-exempt  yields  have  been  adjusted  to  a  tax  equivalent  basis  using  a  34%  tax  rate);
(iii)  the  total  dollar  amounts  of  interest  expense  on  interest-bearing  liabilities  and  the  resulting  average
costs; (iv) net interest income; (v) net interest rate spread; and (vi) net interest margin. Average balances
were calculated based on daily balances. Non-accrual loan balances are included in total loans. Loan fees
and costs are included in interest on  total  loans.

38

Average Balances, Rates, and Interest Income and Expense
(Dollars in thousands)

2017

Year Ended December 31
2016

2015

Average
Balance

Yield/
Interest* Rate Balance Interest* Rate Balance Interest* Rate

Yield/ Average

Yield/ Average

ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Investment securities:

Taxable
Tax-exempt

Total  securities
Cash and  cash equivalents
Total  loans

Total  interest-earning assets
Non-interest-earning assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Interest-bearing liabilities:

NOW, money market and

savings

Time
Brokered

Total  interest-bearing deposits
Federal funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Subordinated debt
FHLBP advances
Other interest-bearing accounts

Total  interest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits
Other liabilities
Stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’

equity

Net interest income

Interest  rate spread

Net interest margin

$ 140,400
43,810

$ 2,983
1,416

2.13% $154,827
53,430
3.23

$ 2,896
1,825

1.87% $177,213
54,578
3.42

$ 2,955
2,112

1.67%
3.87

184,210
26,884
819,594

1,030,688
45,035

$1,075,723

4,399
210
39,508

44,117

2.39
0.78
4.82

4.28

208,257
30,391
571,432

810,080
28,427

$838,507

4,721
129
25,310

30,160

2.27
0.42
4.43

3.72

231,791
21,075
465,944

718,810
22,542

$741,352

5,067
42
20,348

25,457

2.19
0.20
4.37

3.54

$ 507,006
157,954
33,124

$ 2,289
1,257
538

0.45% $428,143
101,268
0.80
22,491
1.62

$ 1,004
706
301

0.23% $414,920
67,487
0.70
14,803
1.34

$

698,084
143
14,229
9,750
54,066
9,673

785,945
184,520
5,046
100,212

4,084
2
28
414
752
440

5,720

0.59
1.22
0.20
4.25
1.39
4.54

0.73

551,902
442
19,878
9,750
31,965
9,722

623,659
142,569
5,179
67,100

2,011
3
40
414
451
405

3,324

0.36
0.72
0.20
4.25
1.41
4.16

0.53

497,210
204
25,574
8,067
20,603
9,765

561,423
115,901
5,115
58,913

590
396
179

1,165
1
51
341
787
367

2,712

0.14%
0.59
1.21

0.23
0.51
0.20
4.22
3.82
3.76

0.48

$1,075,723

$838,507

$741,352

$38,397

$26,836

$22,745

3.55%

3.73%

3.19%

3.31%

3.06%

3.16%

*

All amounts are reported on a tax equivalent basis computed using the statutory federal income tax rate, exclusive of
the alternative minimum tax rate and nondeductible interest expense. The tax equivalent adjustment amounts used in
the  above  table  to  compute  yields  aggregated  $732,000  in  2017,  $981,000  in  2016,  and  $979,000  in  2015.  The  tax
equivalent  net  interest  margin  is  calculated  by  dividing  tax  equivalent  net  interest  income  by  average  total  interest
earning assets.

2. Rate / Volume  Analysis

During  2017,  DNB  recognized  purchase  accounting  accretion  and  amortization  related  to  the
acquisition of ERB which totaled $2.3 million in additional net interest income, affecting interest income
on  loans,  and  interest  expense  on  time  deposits  and  borrowings,  compared  to  $761,000  in  2016.  During
2017,  net  interest  income  increased  $11.6  million  or  43.08%  on  a  tax  equivalent  basis.  As  shown  in  the
following Rate/Volume Analysis table, DNB benefited by $10.0 million in favorable volume changes and by
$1.5 million in favorable rate changes. The favorable change in net interest income due to volume changes
is  mostly  attributable  to  increased  average  balances  of  loans  of  $248.2  million  (affecting  net  interest
income  favorably  by  $12.0  million)  and  decreased  average  balances  of  repurchase  agreements  of

39

$5.6  million  (favorable  change  $12,000),  offset  by  decreased  average  balances  of  investment  securities  of
$24.0 million (unfavorable change of $617,000), decreased average balances of cash and cash equivalents of
$3.5  million  (unfavorable  change  of  $28,000),  increased  average  balances  of  interest-bearing  deposits  of
$146.2 million (unfavorable change of  $981,000), and increased average balances  of  FHLBP advances of
$22.1  million  (unfavorable  change  of  $307,000).  The  favorable  impact  of  increased  yields  on  interest-
earning  assets  outweighed  the  unfavorable  impact  of  increased  rates  on  interest-bearing  liabilities,
resulting  in  a  $1.5  million  favorable  difference.  The  favorable  change  due  to  rate  earned  on  loans  was
$2.2 million (an average rate earned of 4.82% in 2017, compared to 4.43% in 2016). The favorable change
due to rate earned on investments was $295,000 (an average rate earned of 2.39% in 2017, compared to
2.27%  in  2016).  The  favorable  change  due  to  rate  paid  on  cash  and  cash  equivalents  was  $109,000  (an
average rate earned of 0.78% in 2017, compared to 0.42% in 2016). The favorable change due to rate paid
on  FHLBP  advances  was  $6,000  (an  average  rate  paid  of  1.39%  in  2017,  compared  to  1.41%  in  2016).
These favorable changes due to increased yields on interest-earning assets and decreased yields on FHLBP
advances were partially offset by higher rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other interest-bearing
liabilities.  The  unfavorable  change  due  to  rate  on  interest-bearing  deposits  was  $1.1  million  (an  average
rate  paid  of  0.59%  in  2017,  compared  to  0.36%  in  2016).  The  unfavorable  change  due  to  rate  on  other
interest-bearing accounts was $37,000 (an average rate paid of 4.54% in 2017, compared to 4.16% in 2016).
DNB’s composite cost of funds was 0.73% in 2017  compared to 0.53% in 2016.

The following table sets forth, among other things, the extent to which changes in interest rates and
changes  in  the  average  balances  of  interest-earning  assets  and  interest-bearing  liabilities  have  affected
interest  income  and  expense  for  the  periods  noted  (tax-exempt  yields  have  been  adjusted  to  a  tax
equivalent  basis  using  a  34%  tax  rate).  For  each  category  of  interest-earning  assets  and  interest-bearing
liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes attributable to (i) changes in rate (change in rate
multiplied by old volume) and (ii) changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by new rate). The net
change attributable to the combined impact of rate and volume has been allocated proportionately to the
change due to rate and the change due to  volume.

Rate / Volume Analysis
(Dollars in thousands)

Interest-earning assets:
Loans
Investment securities:

Taxable
Tax-exempt

Cash and cash equivalents

Total

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW, money market and savings
Time
Brokered
Federal funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Subordinated notes
FHLBP advances
Other interest-bearing accounts

Total

Net interest income

2017 Versus 2016
Change Due To
Volume

Total

Rate

2016 Versus 2015
Change Due To
Volume

Total

Rate

$2,235

$11,963

$14,198

$ 290

$4,672

$4,962

393
(98)
109

(306)
(311)
(28)

87
(409)
81

360
(248)
47

(419)
(39)
40

(59)
(287)
87

2,639

11,318

13,957

449

4,254

4,703

928
100
64
2
—
—
(6)
37

357
451
173
(3)
(12)
—
307
(2)

1,125

1,271

1,285
551
237
(1)
(12)
—
301
35

2,396

384
74
19
—
—
2
(496)
39

22

30
236
103
2
(11)
71
160
(1)

590

414
310
122
2
(11)
73
(336)
38

612

$1,514

$10,047

$11,561

$ 427

$3,664

$4,091

40

3.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The  largest  component  of  DNB’s  total  income  is  net  interest  income,  and  the  majority  of  DNB’s
financial instruments are comprised of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities with various terms and
maturities.  The  primary  objective  of  management  is  to  maximize  net  interest  income  while  minimizing
interest  rate  risk.  Interest  rate  risk  is  derived  from  timing  differences  in  the  re-pricing  of  assets  and
liabilities, loan prepayments, deposit withdrawals, and differences in lending and funding rates. The Asset/
Liability  Committee  (‘‘ALCO’’)  actively  seeks  to  monitor  and  control  the  mix  of  interest  rate-sensitive
assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities.

ALCO  continually  evaluates  interest  rate  risk  management  opportunities,  including  the  use  of
derivative financial instruments. Management believes that hedging instruments currently available are not
cost-effective, and therefore, has focused its efforts on increasing DNB’s spread by attracting lower-costing
retail deposits and in some instances, borrowing from the FHLB of Pittsburgh. (See additional discussion
in Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in this Form 10-K.)

B. Liquidity and Market Risk Management

Liquidity  is  the  ability  to  meet  current  and  future  financial  obligations.  The  Bank  further  defines
liquidity  as  the  ability  to  respond  to  deposit  outflows  as  well  as  maintain  flexibility  to  take  advantage  of
lending  and  investment  opportunities.  The  Bank’s  primary  sources  of  funds  are  operating  earnings,
deposits, repurchase agreements, principal and interest payments on loans, proceeds from loan sales, sales
and  maturities  of  mortgage-backed  and  investment  securities,  and  FHLBP  advances.  The  Bank  uses  the
funds generated to support its lending and investment activities as well as any other demands for liquidity
such  as  deposit  outflows.  While  maturities  and  scheduled  amortization  of  loans  and  securities  are
predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, mortgage prepayments, loan and security sales and the exercise
of call features are greatly influenced by  general interest rates, economic  conditions and competition.

The  objective  of  DNB’s  asset/liability  management  function  is  to  maintain  consistent  growth  in  net
interest  income  within  DNB’s  policy  limits.  This  objective  is  accomplished  through  the  management  of
liquidity  and  interest  rate  risk,  as  well  as  customer  offerings  of  various  loan  and  deposit  products.  DNB
maintains adequate liquidity to meet daily funding requirements, anticipated deposit withdrawals, or asset
opportunities  in  a  timely  manner.  Liquidity  is  also  necessary  to  meet  obligations  during  unusual,
extraordinary  or  adverse  operating  circumstances,  while  avoiding  a  significant  loss  or  cost.  DNB’s
foundation for liquidity is a stable deposit base as well as a marketable investment portfolio that provides
cash flow through regular maturities or that can be used for collateral to secure funding in an emergency.
As  part  of  its  liquidity  management,  DNB  maintains  assets,  which  comprise  its  liquidity  (Federal  funds
sold, investments and interest-bearing  cash balances,  less pledged securities).

C. Credit Risk Management

DNB defines credit risk as the risk of default by a customer or counter-party. The objective of DNB’s
credit  risk  management  strategy  is  to  quantify  and  manage  credit  risk  on  an  aggregate  portfolio  basis  as
well  as  to  limit  the  risk  of  loss  resulting  from  an  individual  customer  default.  Credit  risk  is  managed
through  a  combination  of  underwriting,  documentation  and  collection  standards.  DNB’s  credit  risk
management  strategy  calls  for  regular  credit  examinations  and  quarterly  management  reviews  of  large
credit  exposures  and  credits  experiencing  credit  quality  deterioration.  DNB’s  loan  review  procedures
provide  objective  assessments  of  the  quality  of  underwriting,  documentation,  risk  grading  and  charge-off
procedures, as well as an assessment of the allowance for credit loss reserve analysis process. As the U.S.
economy moves through a period of recession, it is possible that delinquencies and non-performing assets
may  rise  as  the  value  of  homes  decline  and  DNB’s  borrowers  experience  financial  difficulty  due  to
corporate  downsizing,  reduced  sales  and  income  levels,  or  other  negative  events  which  will  impact  their
ability to meet their contractual loan payments. To minimize the impact on DNB’s earnings and maintain

41

sound  credit  quality,  management  continues  to  aggressively  monitor  credit  and  credit  relationships  that
may be impacted by such adverse factors.

D. Competition

In  addition  to  the  challenges  related  to  the  interest  rate  environment,  community  banks  in  Chester,
Philadelphia  and  Delaware  Counties  have  been  experiencing  increased  competition  from  large  regional
and  international  banks  entering  DNB’s  marketplace  through  mergers  and  acquisitions.  Competition  for
loans  and  deposits  has  negatively  affected  DNB’s  net  interest  margin.  To  compensate  for  the  increased
competition,  DNB,  along  with  other  area  community  banks,  has  aggressively  sought  and  marketed
customers who have been disenfranchised by  these mergers.

To  attract  these  customers,  DNB  offers  deposit  products  and  services,  such  as  Choice  Checking
relationship  products,  and  Online  Banking  with  bill  payment,  external  transfer  and  account  aggregation
functionality.  DNB  also  offers  a  complete  package  of  cash  management  services  including  automated
clearing  house  services,  remote  deposit,  payroll  services,  and  merchant  services  and  account  payment
solutions. Our broad range of Business Checking products provides solutions to meet the needs of a variety
of businesses and non-profit organizations.

V. Critical Accounting Policies and  Estimates

The  following  discussion  and  analysis  of  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  is  based  upon
our  consolidated  financial  statements,  which  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  U.S.  generally
accepted  accounting  principles.  Generally  accepted  accounting  principles  are  complex  and  require
management  to  apply  significant  judgment  to  various  accounting,  reporting  and  disclosure  matters.
Management must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is
not  possible  or  practical.  Actual  results  may  differ  from  these  estimates  under  different  assumptions  or
conditions.

In  management’s  opinion,  the  most  critical  accounting  policies  and  estimates  impacting  DNB’s
consolidated financial statements are in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies
are  critical  because  they  are  highly  dependent  upon  subjective  or  complex  judgments,  assumptions  and
estimates.  Changes  in  such  estimates  may  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  financial  statements.  For  a
complete discussion of DNB’s significant accounting policies, see the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and discussion throughout this  Form 10-K.

VI. 2017 Financial Results

A. Liquidity

Management  maintains  liquidity  to  meet  depositors’  needs  for  funds,  to  satisfy  or  fund  loan
commitments,  and  for  other  operating  purposes.  DNB’s  foundation  for  liquidity  is  a  stable  and  loyal
customer  deposit  base,  cash  and  cash  equivalents,  and  a  marketable  investment  portfolio  that  provides
periodic cash flow through regular maturities and amortization, or that can be used as collateral to secure
funding. Primary liquidity includes investments, Federal funds sold, and interest-bearing cash balances, less
pledged securities. DNB also anticipates scheduled payments and prepayments on its loan and mortgage-
backed  securities  portfolios.  In  addition,  DNB  maintains  borrowing  arrangements  with  various
correspondent  banks,  the  Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  of  Pittsburgh  and  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank  of
Philadelphia to meet short-term liquidity needs. Through these relationships, DNB has available credit of
approximately  $516.9  million  at  December  31,  2017.  Management  believes  that  DNB  has  adequate
resources to meet  its short-term and  long-term funding  requirements.

As of December 31, 2017, deposits totaled $861.2 million, down $24.0 million from $885.2 million at
December  31,  2016.  There  are  $108.4  million  in  certificates  of  deposit  (including  IRAs  and  brokered

42

deposits) scheduled to mature during 2018. Management believes that the majority of such deposits will be
reinvested with DNB and that certificates that are not renewed will be funded by a reduction in cash and
cash  equivalents  or  by  pay-downs  and  maturities  of  loans  and  investments.  At  December  31,  2017,  DNB
had  $176.6  million  in  un-funded  loan  commitments.  In  addition,  there  were  $4.6  million  in  un-funded
letters of credit. Management anticipates the majority of these commitments will be funded by means of
normal cash flows. Included in interest bearing deposits are time and brokered deposits issued in amounts
of $100,000 or more and their remaining  maturities at December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Time and Brokered Deposits Greater Than  or  Equal  to $100,000
(Dollars in thousands)

Three months or less
Over three through six months
Over six  through twelve months
Over one year through two years
Over two years

Total

December 31, 2017

Brokered
Time Deposits Deposits

Total

$28,186
22,692
21,470
15,335
4,337

$92,020

$ — $28,186
22,692
22,342
16,829
4,337

—
872
1,494
—

$2,366

$94,386

The following table sets forth the composition of DNB’s  deposits at the dates indicated.

Deposits By Major Classification
(Dollars in thousands)

Non-interest-bearing deposits
Interest-bearing deposits:

NOW
Money market
Savings
Certificates
IRA
Brokered

Total deposits

2017

2016

December 31
2015

2014

2013

$176,815

$173,467

$125,581

$102,107

$101,853

199,310
221,726
81,050
122,653
17,837
41,812

224,219
184,783
86,176
166,565
20,691
29,286

185,973
137,555
72,660
55,180
10,838
18,488

205,816
143,483
66,634
62,747
14,058
10,238

170,427
130,835
60,090
75,856
19,686
—

$861,203

$885,187

$606,275

$605,083

$558,747

For detailed information regarding the maturity of our time deposits and certificates of deposit, see

Note 7 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

B. Capital Resources and Adequacy

Stockholders’  equity  was  $101.9  million  at  December  31,  2017,  compared  to  $94.8  million  at
December 31, 2016. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily a result of earnings of $7.9 million,
restricted  stock  compensation  expense  of  $559,000,  and  sales  of  treasury  shares  totaling  $542,000.  These
increases were partially offset by $1.2 million of dividends paid on DNB’s common stock, $635,000 of taxes
on share awards vesting, and $116,000 of other comprehensive loss. We have modeled our ratios under the
finalized Basel III rules and we do not expect that we will be required to raise additional capital as a result
of these  rules.

43

Based  on  management’s  assessment,  DNB  and  the  Bank  have  each  met  the  definition  of  ‘‘well
capitalized’’ for regulatory purposes on December 31, 2017. The Bank’s capital category is determined for
the purposes of applying the bank regulators’ ‘‘prompt corrective action’’ regulations and for determining
levels of deposit insurance assessments and may not constitute an accurate representation of DNB’s or the
Bank’s  overall  financial  condition  or  prospects.  DNB’s  capital  exceeds  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank’s
(‘‘FRB’s’’) minimum leverage ratio requirements for bank holding companies (see additional discussion in
Regulatory Matters—Note 18 to DNB’s  Consolidated Financial Statements).

Under federal banking laws and regulations, DNB and the Bank are required to maintain minimum
capital  as  determined  by  certain  regulatory  ratios.  Capital  adequacy  for  regulatory  purposes,  and  the
capital category assigned to an institution by its regulators, may be determinative of an institution’s overall
financial condition.

C. Results of Operations

1. Summary of Performance

(a) Summary of Results

For the year ended December 31, 2017, DNB reported net income available to common shareholders
of  $7.9  million,  an  increase  of  $3.0  million  from  $5.0  million  reported  for  the  year  ended  December  31,
2016, or $1.85 per diluted share versus $1.55 per diluted share, respectively. DNB’s 2016 results include the
operations of the former East River Bank for the fourth quarter of 2016, a $1.2 million gain from insurance
proceeds  associated  with  a  fire  at  one  of  DNB’s  offices  during  the  second  quarter  of  2015,  as  well  as
$2.2 million of due diligence and merger related costs associated with its acquisition of East River Bank.

There are many aspects of the economy and the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy that hinder DNB’s
ability  to  grow  revenues  and  net  income.  One  of  the  most  significant  factors  is  that  the  global  and  U.S.
economies  have  experienced  reduced  business  activity  as  a  result  of  disruptions  in  the  financial  system
during the past nine years. The United States, Europe, China and many other countries across the globe
are  struggling  with  too  much  debt  and  weaker  streams  of  revenues  as  a  result  of  recessionary  pressures,
falling oil prices and high unemployment. Overall economic growth continues to be slow at a time when
national  and  regional  unemployment  rates  have  improved,  however  participation  rates  remain  at
historically  low  levels.  The  risks  associated  with  our  business  remain  acute  in  periods  of  slow  economic
growth.  While  we  are  continuing  to  take  steps  to  decrease  and  limit  our  exposure  to  problem  loans,  we
nonetheless  retain  direct  exposure  to  the  residential  and  commercial  real  estate  markets,  and  we  are
affected by these events.

The  January  17,  2018  Beige  Book  indicated  that  aggregate  business  activity  in  the  Third  District
continued  at  a  modest  pace  of  growth  during  the  January  17,  2018  Beige  Book  period.  Non-auto  retail
sales,  tourist  activity,  manufacturing,  and  nonfinancial  services  grew  modestly,  while  new  home
construction  and  existing  home  sales  appeared  to  grow  slightly.  Little  change  was  noted  by  the  Federal
Reserve’s contacts in nonresidential construction and nonresidential leasing markets. Auto sales appeared
to have declined modestly. On balance, employment, wages, and prices continued to grow modestly. Most
firms  in  the  Third  District  anticipated  continued  growth  over  the  next  six  months—a  somewhat  higher
percentage than during the November  29, 2017  Beige Book period.

Overall,  Third  District  homebuilders  continued  to  report  slight  growth  in  activity  during  the
January 17, 2018 Beige Book period. On balance, brokers in Third District housing markets continued to
report  slight  growth  of  existing  home  sales.  In  most  local  markets,  exceedingly  low  inventories  of  houses
constrain sales and place upward pressure  on  house prices.

The Federal Reserve’s non-residential real estate contacts reported no significant changes in the high
levels of overall construction activity. Commercial contractors focused on Philadelphia noted that 2017 was
a strong year and that activity should continue through 2018. New project announcements are needed to

44

extend  January  17,  2018  activity  levels  into  2019.  Rising  lease  rates  and  new  construction  of  industrial/
warehouse space continued to be noted in many Third District markets. Essentially, little change was noted
in the level of leasing activity, although markets vary significantly  by sector and geography.

Third District financial firms reported modest growth of overall loan volumes, excluding credit cards,
similar to the November 29, 2017 Beige Book period. Loan volumes grew modestly in home equity lines
and auto loans, while mortgages and commercial real estate loans grew slightly. Growth in commercial and
industrial  loan  volumes  was  stronger,  while  the  volume  of  other  consumer  loans  fell.  The  significant
seasonal  increase  in  credit  card  volumes  anticipated  for  the  recent  holiday  period  did  occur  and  was
comparable  in  size  to  the  increase  during  the  same  period  last  year.  The  Federal  Reserve’s  banking
contacts  described  solid  ongoing  economic  growth  in  most  parts  of  the  District.  Several  noted  that
previously hot sectors, including commercial real estate and multifamily housing, appear to have plateaued
or cooled off a bit. Credit quality was  portrayed  as very good.

Third  District  manufacturing  firms  reported  that,  on  balance,  manufacturing  activity  continued  at  a
modest pace of growth, with a few signs of slight improvement. The percentage of firms reporting increases
in new orders rose slightly compared with the November 29, 2017 Beige Book period but changed little for
shipments.  The  makers  of  paper  products,  chemicals,  primary  metal  products,  industrial  machinery,  and
electronic equipment continued to note gains in new orders and shipments, while firms in the lumber and
fabricated metal sectors reported declines in activity. A majority of the Federal Reserve’s manufacturing
contacts continued to expect general activity to increase over the next six months. The percentage of firms
expecting  future  increases  for  general  activity  rose  above  60  percent.  By  comparison,  the  percentage  of
firms expecting increases in future capital expenditures and future employment held mostly steady at levels
just  above  40  percent.  However,  a  somewhat  higher  percentage  of  firms  expected  decreases  in  future
employment compared with the November 29,  2017 Beige Book period.

Although DNB’s earnings have been impacted by the general economic conditions, the impact has not
been  as  severe  as  it  has  been  in  many  parts  of  the  nation,  largely  due  to  a  relatively  healthier  economic
climate  in  the  Third  Federal  Reserve  District,  compared  to  other  areas  of  the  country.  DNB’s  franchise
spans Chester, Philadelphia and Delaware counties in southeastern Pennsylvania and the majority of loans
and  deposits  relationships  are  with  businesses  and  individuals  within  the  Third  Federal  Reserve  District.

These and other factors have impacted our operations. We continue to focus on the consistency and
stability of core earnings and balance sheet strength which are critical success factors in today’s challenging
economic environment.

(b) Significant Events, Transactions  and  Economic Changes Affecting Results

Some of  DNB’s significant events during 2017 include:

(cid:127) DNB recorded a deferred tax adjustment, which reduced DNB’s 2017 net income by $1.8 million or
$0.43  per  diluted  share,  due  to  the  enactment  of  the  Tax  Cuts  and  Jobs  Act.  This  Act  reduced
corporate income tax rates from 34% to 21%, leading management to revalue its net Deferred Tax
Asset, effective as of December 22, 2017.

(cid:127) DNB  completed  its  acquisition  of  East  River  Bank  on  October  1,  2016,  therefore  2017  results  of
operations reflect the first full year that includes  the operations  of the former East  River  Bank.

(c) Trends and Uncertainties

Please refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations-Introductory Overview in this  Form 10-K.

45

(d) Material Changes in Results

Please  refer  to  the  discussion  above  in  the  section  titled  ‘‘Significant  Events,  Transactions  and

Economic Changes Affecting Results.’’

(e) Effect of Inflation and Changing Rates

For detailed discussion of the effects of inflation and changes in rates on DNB’s results, refer to the

following discussion on ‘‘Net Interest  Income.’’

2. Net  Interest Income

DNB’s earnings performance is primarily dependent upon its level of net interest income, which is the
excess of interest income over interest expense. Interest income includes interest earned on loans (net of
interest  reversals  on  non-performing  loans),  investments  and  Federal  funds  sold,  as  well  as  net  loan  fee
amortization  and  dividend  income.  Interest  expense  includes  the  interest  cost  for  deposits,  FHLBP
advances,  repurchase  agreements,  corporate  debentures,  Federal  funds  purchased  and  other  borrowings.

During  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  management  focused  on  growing  the  loan  portfolio,
controlling our composite cost of funds, increasing penetration of new and existing households, as well as
maintaining  strong  asset  quality.  Total  loans  increased  $28.4  million  or  3.47%  on  a  year-over  year  basis,
while our composite cost of funds for the year ended December 31, 2017 was 0.73%, compared to 0.53% in
2016.  The  net  interest  margin  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017  was  3.73%  compared  to  3.31%  in
2016.  The  increased  net  interest  margin  was  primarily  caused  by  the  higher  volume  and  higher  yield  of
interest-earning  assets  in  2017,  over  2016.  DNB  also  recognized  purchase  accounting  accretion  and
amortization related to the acquisition of ERB which totaled $2.3 million in additional net interest income,
affecting  interest  income  on  loans,  and  interest  expense  on  time  deposits  and  borrowings,  compared  to
$761,000 in 2016.

Interest  on  loans  was  $39.3  million  for  2017,  compared  to  $24.9  million  for  2016,  a  $14.3  million
increase. The average balance of loans was $819.6 million with an average tax equivalent yield of 4.82% in
2017, compared to $571.4 million with an  average tax equivalent  yield of 4.43% in 2016.

Interest and dividends on investment securities was $3.9 million for 2017, compared to $4.1 million for
2016, a $185,000 decline. The average balance of investment securities was $184.2 million with an average
tax equivalent yield of 2.39% in 2017, compared to $208.3 million with an average tax equivalent yield of
2.27% in 2016.

Interest  on  deposits  was  $4.1  million  for  2017,  compared  to  $2.0  million  for  2016,  a  $2.1  million
increase.  The  average  balance  of  interest-bearing  deposits  was  $698.1  million  with  an  average  rate  of
0.59% for 2017, compared to $551.9 million with  an average rate of 0.36% for  2016.

Interest  on  FHLBP  advances  was  $752,000  for  2017,  compared  to  $451,000  for  2016.  The  average
balance  on  FHLBP  advances  was  $54.1  million  with  an  average  rate  of  1.39%  for  2017,  compared  to
$32.0 million with an average rate of 1.41% for 2016. The increase in interest expense was primarily the
result of the higher volume of FHLBP advances in 2017. The level of FHLB advances increased, primarily
during  the  fourth  quarter  of  2017,  in  part  to  fund  loan  demand,  and  in  part  to  replace  deposits  that
declined during December as a result  of several commercial customers  cyclical cash needs.

Interest on other interest bearing accounts was $440,000 for 2017, compared to $405,000 for 2016. The
average balance on other interest bearing accounts was $9.7 million with an average rate of 4.54% for 2017
compared to $9.7 million with an average  rate  of  4.16% for 2016.

Interest  on  subordinated  debt  was  $414,000  for  both  2017  and  2016.  The  average  balance  on

subordinated debt was $9.8 million with an  average rate of 4.25%  for both  2017 and  2016.

46

3. Provision for Credit Losses

To provide for known and inherent losses in the loan and lease portfolio, DNB maintains an allowance
for  credit  losses.  There  was  a  $1.7  million  provision  made  in  2017  compared  to  $730,000  in  2016.  For  a
detailed discussion on DNB’s reserve methodology, refer to ‘‘Item 1—Determination of the allowance for
credit losses’’ which can be found under ‘‘Critical Accounting  Policies and Estimates’’.

4. Non-Interest Income

Non-interest  income  includes  service  charges  on  deposit  products;  fees  received  in  connection  with
the  sale  of  non-depository  products  and  services,  including  fiduciary  and  investment  advisory  services
offered  through  DNB  First  Investment  Management  and  Trust;  non-depository  securities  brokerage
products and services and insurance products and services offered through DNB Investments & Insurance;
and other sources of income such as increases in the cash surrender value of Bank Owned Life Insurance
(‘‘BOLI’’), net gains on sales of investment securities and loans. In addition, DNB receives fees for cash
management, remote capture, merchant services, debit cards, safe deposit box rentals and similar activities.

Non-interest  income  was  $5.4  million  for  2017  compared  to  $6.4  million  for  2016.  The  $946,000
decrease  was  primarily  due  to  decreases  of  $977,000  in  gains  from  insurance  proceeds  (DNB  received
$1.18 million in gains on insurance proceeds in 2016 as a result of a fire at our West Chester offices that
occurred  during  the  second  quarter  of  2015),  $381,000  in  gains  on  sale  of  investment  securities,  and
$134,000 in mortgage banking. These decreases were offset by increases of $279,000 in other fees (mostly
servicing fee income), $114,000 in gains on sale of loans, $79,000 in Wealth Management, and $77,000 in
service charges on deposits (mostly NSF fees and business analysis charges from accounts acquired from
East River).

5. Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest  expense  includes  salaries  &  employee  benefits,  furniture  &  equipment,  occupancy,
professional & consulting fees as well as marketing, printing & supplies, FDIC insurance, PA shares tax,
telecommunications, write-downs on other real estate owned (‘‘OREO’’) and other repossessed property
and  other  less  significant  expense  items.  Non-interest  expenses  increased  during  2017  by  $3.4  million  or
13.72% compared to 2016. The $3.4 million increase was largely due to the addition of former East River
staff,  offices and equipment.

Salary and employee benefits. Salary and employee benefits were $15.2 million for 2017 compared to
$12.3  million  for  2016.  The  $2.9  million  increase  was  primarily  attributable  to  East  River  staff  salaries
increased  only  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2016  after  the  acquisition,  compared  to  a  full  year  of  East  River
staff salaries in 2017, higher level of full-time equivalent employees year over year, increased recruitment
fees, and increased SERP expense.

Furniture  and  equipment. Furniture  and  equipment  expense  was  $2.1  million  for  2017  compared  to
$1.5  million  for  2016.  The  $572,000  increase  was  mainly  attributable  to  an  increase  in  maintenance
agreements and increased depreciation  for fixed assets due to the acquisition of East River.

Occupancy. Occupancy  expense  was  $2.7  million  for  2017  compared  to  $2.1  million  for  2016.  The
$596,000  increase  was  mainly  attributable  to  an  increase  in  office  building  rental  expense  for  our  West
Chester branch and the acquisition of three East River branch offices in the fourth quarter of 2016, and
increased depreciation for fixed assets.

Professional and Consulting. Professional and consulting expense was $1.9 million for 2017 compared
to $1.3 million for 2016. The $583,000 increase was mainly attributable to increases in audit and accounting
fees of $192,000, third party services of $176,000, consulting expenses of $121,000 related to recruitment

47

and  placement  fees  for  new  employees,  and  loan  expenses  of  $110,000,  offset  by  a  decrease  in  legal
expense of $16,000.

Loss on sale or write-down of OREO and other repossessed property. During 2017, DNB had $121,000
of net loss on the sale/write-downs of OREO properties compared to $644,000 in 2016. At December 31,
2017, DNB held $5.0 million of such assets, compared to $2.8 million at December 31,  2016.

Due diligence and merger expense. Merger and acquisition expenses in connection with the acquisition

of East River totaled $77,000 for 2017  compared  to  $2.2 million for 2016.

Other  expenses. Other  expenses  were  $3.1  million  for  2017  compared  to  $2.2  million  for  2016.  The
$942,000  increase  was  primarily  due  to  increases  in  OREO  expenses,  officer  and  employee  expenses,
director’s fees, Visa card charge-offs, and bank service charges as a result of the acquisition of East River.

6.

Income Taxes

Income  tax  expense  was  $5.5  million  and  $1.9  million  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017  and
2016, respectively. The effective tax rates for 2017 and 2016 were 40.71% and 27.29%, respectively. Income
tax expense for each period primarily differs from the amount determined at the statutory rate of 34% due
to  tax-exempt  income  on  loans  and  investment  securities,  DNB’s  ownership  of  BOLI  policies  and  tax
credits  recognized  on  the  exercise  of  stock  options  and  the  vesting  of  restricted  shares.  The  significant
increase in the effective tax rate for 2017 as compared to 2016 was caused by a $1.8 million charge to adjust
deferred taxes, due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This Act reduced corporate income tax
rates  from  34%  to  21%,  leading  management  to  revalue  its  net  Deferred  Tax  Assets,  effective  as  of
December  22,  2017.  For  more  information  related  to  income  taxes,  refer  to  Note  12  in  the  Notes  to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

D. Financial Condition Analysis

1.

Investment Securities

DNB’s  investment  portfolio  consists  of  U.S.  agency  securities,  mortgage-backed  securities  and
collateralized  mortgage  obligations  issued  by  U.S.  Government  agencies,  state  and  municipal  securities,
bank stocks, and other bonds and notes. In addition to generating revenue, DNB maintains the investment
portfolio to manage interest rate risk, provide liquidity, provide collateral for borrowings and to diversify
the credit risk of earning assets. The portfolio is structured to maximize DNB’s net interest income given
changes in the economic environment, liquidity  position and balance sheet mix.

Given the nature of the portfolio, and its generally high credit quality, management expects to realize
all  of  its  investment  upon  the  maturity  of  such  instruments.  Management  determines  the  appropriate
classification of securities at the time of purchase. Investment securities are classified as: (a) securities held
to  maturity  (‘‘HTM’’)  based  on  management’s  intent  and  ability  to  hold  them  to  maturity;  (b)  trading
account (‘‘TA’’) securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near
term;  and  (c)  securities  available  for  sale  (‘‘AFS’’).  DNB  does  not  currently  maintain  a  trading  account
portfolio.

Securities classified as AFS include securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates,
changes in prepayment assumptions, the need to increase regulatory capital or other similar requirements.
DNB does not necessarily intend to sell such securities, but has classified them as AFS to provide flexibility
to respond to liquidity needs.

DNB’s investment portfolio (HTM and AFS securities) totaled $174.2 million at December 31, 2017,
down  $8.0  million  or  4.41%  from  $182.2  million  at  December  31,  2016.  The  $8.0  million  decrease  in
investment securities was primarily due to $39.4 million in sales, principal pay-downs, calls and maturities,
and  a change in unrealized loss of $126,000, offset by $31.8 million in purchases.

48

At December 31, 2017, approximately 64% of DNB’s investments were in the AFS portfolio and 36%
were  in  the  HTM  portfolio.  Investments  consist  mainly  of  mortgage-backed  securities  and  Agency  notes
backed by government sponsored enterprises, such as FHLMC, FNMA and FHLB. Management regularly
reviews its investment portfolio to determine whether any securities are other than temporarily impaired.
At December 31, 2017, the combined AFS and HTM portfolios had an unrealized pretax gains of $486,000
and  an  unrealized  pretax  losses  of  $2.2  million.  At  December  31,  2016,  the  combined  AFS  and  HTM
portfolios had an unrealized pretax gain of $634,000 and an unrealized pretax loss of $3.2 million. There
were no other than temporarily impaired securities.

The  following  tables  set  forth  information  regarding  the  composition,  stated  maturity  and  average
yield  of  DNB’s  investment  security  portfolio  as  of  the  dates  indicated  (tax-exempt  yields  have  been
adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using a 34% tax rate). The first two tables do not include amortization or
anticipated  prepayments  on  mortgage-backed  securities.  Callable  securities  are  included  at  their  stated
maturity dates.

Investment Maturity Schedule, Including Weighted Average  Yield
(Dollars in thousands)

Held to Maturity

US Government  agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Corporate bonds
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
State and municipal taxable
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total

Percent of portfolio

Weighted average yield

Available for Sale

US Government  agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total

Percent of portfolio

Weighted average yield

Less  than
1  Year

1-5
Years

December 31,  2017

5-10
Years

Over  10
Years

Total

Yield

$—
—
—
—
—
—

$—

$ 8,483
—
6,144
—
363
7,529

$ — $ — $ 8,483
496
14,047
1,471
363
37,530

—
—
1,471
—
10,485

496
7,903
—
—
19,516

$22,519

$27,915

$11,956

$62,390

3.12%
2.86
4.68
2.14
2.70
2.20

2.89%

—%

—%

36%

45%

2.89%

3.17%

19%

2.23%

100%

2.89%

Less than
1  Year

1-5
Years

5-10
Years

Over
10  Years

Total

Yield

$15,152
—
—
1,987
—

$33,911
1,526
—
8,039
—

$ 3,830
6,021
1,457
2,794
288

$ — $ 52,893
32,488
11,654
12,820
1,928

24,941
10,197
—
1,640

1.42%
1.95
1.75
2.54
1.92

$17,139

$43,476

$14,390

$36,778

$111,783

1.74%

15%

1.25%

39%

13%

33%

1.56%

2.41%

1.92%

100%

1.74%

49

Composition of Investment Securities
(Dollars in thousands)

Held  to Maturity

US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Corporate  bonds
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
State and  municipal taxable
State and  municipal tax-exempt

Total

Available for Sale

US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate  bonds
State and  municipal tax-exempt
Asset-backed security

Total

2. Loan and Lease Portfolio

2017

December 31
2016

2015

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair  Value

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair Value

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair Value

$ 8,483
496
14,047
1,471
363
37,530

$62,390

$ 8,646
505
14,288
1,442
355
37,184

$62,420

$ 8,224
1,440
12,825
1,966
1,008
41,559

$67,022

$ 8,533
1,478
12,992
1,946
1,014
40,161

$66,124

$ 7,973
2,759
11,518
2,623
2,623
42,956

$67,829

$ 8,293
2,842
11,710
2,606
2,606
42,980

$68,431

2017

December 31
2016

2015

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair Value

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair Value

Amortized
Cost

Estimated
Fair Value

$ 53,279
33,203
12,101
12,981
1,991
—

$113,555

$ 52,893
32,488
11,654
12,820
1,928
—

$111,783

$ 52,428
30,861
12,957
15,474
5,084
26

$116,830

$ 52,309
30,140
12,573
15,180
4,956
26

$115,184

$ 58,460
40,663
16,241
20,921
17,274
—

$153,559

$ 58,208
40,351
15,806
20,571
17,443
—

$152,379

DNB’s  loan  and  lease  portfolio  consists  primarily  of  commercial  and  residential  real  estate  loans,
commercial  loans  and  lines  of  credit  (including  commercial  construction),  commercial  leases  and
consumer  loans.  The  portfolio  provides  a  stable  source  of  interest  income,  monthly  amortization  of
principal and, in the case of adjustable rate  loans, re-pricing opportunities.

Total  loans  were  $845.9  million  at  December  31,  2017,  up  $28.4  million  or  3.47%  from  2016.  Gross
loans  funded  during  2017  were  $263.9  million,  compared  to  $146.1  million  in  2016.  DNB  acquired
$306.4 million in loans from the acquisition of ERB in 2016. Paydowns on loans were $235.5 million, up
101.80%  from  $116.7  million  in  2016.  Commercial  mortgage  loans  grew  $19.4  million  or  4.16%  to
$484.9  million,  commercial  loans  grew  by  $8.6  million  or  4.40%  to  $204.5  million,  and  residential  loans
grew  $6.4  million  or  7.28%  to  $94.0  million.  Consumer  loans  decreased  $6.0  million  or  8.77%  to
$62.5 million.

The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of total loans outstanding, net

of unearned income and fees and the  allowance  for  credit losses, as  of the dates indicated.

50

Total Loans Outstanding, Net of Allowance for Credit Losses
(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Lease financing
Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total loans
Less allowance for credit losses

Net loans

2017

2016

December 31
2015

2014

2013

$ 93,959
484,868

$ 87,581
465,486

$ 28,651
274,132

$ 25,993
257,310

$ 24,677
234,599

129,535
75,014
—

123,175
72,755
—

102,178
20,364
—

56,844
5,677

62,560
5,972

51,270
5,163

80,819
35,534
—

50,192
5,755

89,279
19,117
2

41,418
6,262

845,897
(5,843)

817,529
(5,373)

481,758
(4,935)

455,603
(4,906)

415,354
(4,623)

$840,054

$812,156

$476,823

$450,697

$410,731

The following table sets forth information concerning the contractual maturities of the loan portfolio,
net of unearned income and fees. For amortizing loans, scheduled repayments for the maturity category in
which  the payment is due are not reflected  below,  because  such information is  not  readily available.

Loan Maturities
(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total loans

Loans with fixed interest rates
Loans with variable interest rates

Total loans

3. Non-Performing Assets

Less than
1 Year

December 31, 2017
Over 5
Years

1-5
Years

Total

$ 7,391
28,416

744
$
148,357

$ 85,824
308,095

$ 93,959
484,868

12,680
41,101

81
20

89,689

25,923
63,766

19,782
8,986

97,073
24,927

129,535
75,014

3,050
861

53,713
4,796

56,844
5,677

181,780

574,428

845,897

137,850
43,930

270,877
303,551

434,650
411,247

$89,689

$181,780

$574,428

$845,897

Total non-performing assets increased $1.3 million to $12.6 million at December 31, 2017, compared
to $11.3 million at December 31, 2016. The $1.3 million increase was attributable to a $2.2 million increase
in other real estate owned & other repossessed property and a $54,000 increase in loans 90 days past due
and  still  accruing,  offset  by  a  $1.0  million  decrease  in  non-accrual  loans.  As  a  result  of  the  decrease  in
non-performing  loans  and  a  $28.4  million  net  increase  in  gross  loans,  the  non-performing  loans  to  total
loans  ratio  decreased  to  0.89%  at  December  31,  2017,  from  1.04%  at  December  31,  2016.  The

51

non-performing  assets  to  total  assets  ratio  increased  to  1.16%  at  December  31,  2017  from  1.05%  at
December  31,  2016.  The  allowance  to  non-performing  loans  ratio  increased  to  77.36%  at  December  31,
2017  from  63.20%  at  December  31,  2016.  DNB  continues  to  work  diligently  to  improve  asset  quality  by
adhering to strict underwriting standards and improving lending policies and procedures. Non-performing
assets  have  had,  and  will  continue  to  have,  an  impact  on  earnings;  therefore  management  intends  to
continue working aggressively to reduce  the level  of  such assets.

Non-performing assets are comprised of non-accrual loans, loans delinquent over ninety days and still
accruing, as well as OREO and other repossessed assets. Non-accrual loans are loans for which the accrual
of  interest  ceases  when  the  collection  of  principal  or  interest  payments  is  determined  to  be  doubtful  by
management.  It  is  the  policy  of  DNB  to  discontinue  the  accrual  of  interest  when  principal  or  interest
payments  are  delinquent  90  days  or  more  (unless  the  loan  principal  and  interest  are  determined  by
management to be fully secured and in the process of collection), or earlier if considered prudent. Interest
received  on  such  loans  is  applied  to  the  principal  balance,  or  may,  in  some  instances,  be  recognized  as
income on a cash basis. A non-accrual loan or lease may be restored to accrual status when management
expects to collect all contractual principal and interest due and the borrower has demonstrated a sustained
period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms. OREO consists of real estate
acquired by foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Other repossessed assets are primarily assets from
DNB’s commercial lease portfolio that were repossessed. OREO and other repossessed assets are carried
at  the  lower  of  carrying  value  or  estimated  fair  value,  less  estimated  disposition  costs.  Any  significant
change  in  the  level  of  non-performing  assets  is  dependent,  to  a  large  extent,  on  the  economic  climate
within DNB’s market area.

DNB’s Credit Policy Committee monitors the performance of the loan and lease portfolio to identify
potential  problem  assets  on  a  timely  basis.  Committee  members  meet  to  design,  implement  and  review
asset recovery strategies, which serve to maximize the recovery of each troubled asset. Of the $13.0 million
loans classified as substandard as of December 31, 2017, $4.5 million are performing and are believed to
require  increased  supervision  and  review;  and  may,  depending  on  the  economic  environment  and  other
factors,  become  non-performing  assets  in  future  periods.  The  majority  of  these  loans  are  secured  by
commercial  real  estate,  with  lesser  amounts  being  secured  by  residential  real  estate,  inventory  and
receivables. The amount of performing substandard  loans at December 31, 2016 was  $13.5 million.

52

The following table sets forth those assets that are: (i) placed on non-accrual status, (ii) contractually
delinquent  by  90  days  or  more  and  still  accruing,  and  (iii)  OREO  as  a  result  of  foreclosure  or  voluntary
transfer to DNB as well as other repossessed assets. In addition, the table sets forth DNB’s asset quality
and allowance coverage ratios at the  dates  indicated:

Non-Performing Assets
(Dollars in thousands)

Non-accrual loans:

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total non-accrual loans
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing

Total non-performing loans
Other real estate owned & other repossessed property

2017

December 31
2015

2016

2014

2013

$ 1,915
2,259

$ 1,770
4,593

$1,619
1,048

$2,457
1,294

$2,250
266

2,100
514

466
245

7,499
54

7,553
5,012

198
1,242

442
256

8,501
—

8,501
2,767

188
1,028

563
189

4,635
457

5,092
2,581

198
2,043

432
95

6,519
334

6,853
901

—
2,554

434
82

5,586
141

5,727
1,096

Total non-performing assets

$12,565

$11,268

$7,673

$7,754

$6,823

Asset quality ratios:

Non-performing loans to total loans
Non-performing assets to total assets

Allowance for credit losses to:

Total loans
Non-performing loans

0.89%
1.16

1.04% 1.06% 1.50% 1.38%
1.05

1.02

1.07

1.03

0.69
77.36

0.66
63.20

1.02
96.91

1.08
71.59

1.11
80.70

If  contractual  interest  income  had  been  recorded  on  non-accrual  loans,  interest  would  have  been

increased as shown in the following tables:

Non-accrual Loans  — Contractual Interest  Income
(Dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, 2017

December 31,
2017
Amount

Interest income that
would have been
recorded under
original terms

Interest income
recorded
during the period

Net  impact on
interest income

Non-accrual loans:

Residential mortgage
Commercial  mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total non-accrual loans
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing

Total non-performing loans

$ 76
181

137
149

22
24

589
2

$591

$—
—

—
—

—
—

—
2

$ 2

$ 76
181

137
149

22
24

589
—

$589

$1,915
2,259

2,100
514

466
245

7,499
54

$7,553

53

Year Ended December 31, 2016

December 31,
2016
Amount

Interest income that
would have been
recorded under
original terms

Interest income
recorded

Net  impact on
during the  period interest income

$1,770
4,593

198
1,242

442
256

8,501
—

$8,501

$ 74
277

11
180

28
20

590
2

$592

$—
—

—
—

—
—

—
2

$ 2

$ 74
277

11
180

28
20

590
—

$590

Non-accrual loans:

Residential  mortgage
Commercial  mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total non-accrual loans
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing

Total non-performing loans

4. Allowance for Credit Losses

To  provide  for  known  and  inherent  losses  in  the  loan  and  lease  portfolios,  DNB  maintains  an
allowance  for  credit  losses.  Provisions  for  credit  losses  are  charged  against  income  to  increase  the
allowance when necessary. Loan and lease losses are charged directly against the allowance and recoveries
on previously charged-off loans are added to the allowance. In establishing its allowance for credit losses,
management considers the size and risk exposure of each segment of the loan and lease portfolio, past loss
experience,  present  indicators  of  risk  such  as  delinquency  rates,  levels  of  non-accruals,  the  potential  for
losses  in  future  periods,  and  other  relevant  factors.  Management’s  evaluation  of  criticized  and  classified
loans  generally  includes  reviews  of  borrowers  of  $100,000  or  greater.  Consideration  is  also  given  to
examinations performed by regulatory  agencies, primarily the OCC.

Management  reviews  and  establishes  the  adequacy  of  the  allowance  for  credit  losses  in  accordance
with  U.S.  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  guidance  provided  by  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission and as prescribed in OCC Bulletin 2006-47. Its methodology for assessing the appropriateness
of the allowance consists of several key elements which include: specific allowances for identified impaired
loans;  and  allowances  by  loan  type  for  pooled  homogenous  loans.  In  considering  national  and  local
economic  trends,  we  review  a  variety  of  information  including  Federal  Reserve  publications,  general
economic  statistics,  foreclosure  rates  and  housing  statistics  published  by  third  parties.  We  believe  this
improves  the  measure  of  inherent  loss  over  a  complete  economic  cycle  and  reduces  the  impact  for
qualitative adjustments. An unallocated portion of the allowance is intended to provide for probable losses
not  otherwise  accounted  for  in  management’s  other  elements  of  its  overall  estimate.  An  unallocated
component  is  maintained  to  cover  uncertainties  such  as  changes  in  the  national  and  local  economy,
concentrations  of  credit,  expansion  into  new  markets  and  other  factors  that  could  affect  management’s
estimate  of  probable  losses.  The  unallocated  component  of  the  allowance  also  reflects  the  margin  of
imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and
general losses in the portfolio.

In  addition,  DNB  reviews  historical  loss  experience  for  the  commercial  real  estate,  commercial,
residential  real  estate,  home  equity  and  consumer  installment  loan  pools  to  determine  historical  loss
factors.  The  historical  loss  factors  are  then  applied  to  the  current  portfolio  balances  to  determine  the
required reserve percentage for each loan pool based on risk rating. Historical losses are segregated into
risk-similar  groups  and  a  loss  ratio  is  determined  for  each  group  over  a  five  year  period.  The  five  year
average loss ratio by type is then used to calculate the estimated loss based on the current balance of each
group.  This  five  year  time  period  is  appropriate  given  DNB’s  historical  level  of  losses  and,  more
importantly, represents the current economic environment.

54

This analysis is intended to assess the potential for loss within the loan portfolio and to substantiate
the  adequacy  of  the  allowance.  Should  the  analysis  indicate  that  the  allowance  is  not  adequate,
management will recommend a provision expense be made in an amount equal to the shortfall derived. In
establishing  and  reviewing  the  allowance  for  adequacy,  emphasis  has  been  placed  on  utilizing  the
methodology prescribed in OCC Bulletin 2006-47. Management believes that the following factors create a
comprehensive  system  of  controls  in  which  management  can  monitor  the  quality  of  the  loan  portfolio.
Consideration  has  been  given  to  the  following  factors  and  variables  which  may  influence  the  risk  of  loss
within the loan portfolio:

(cid:127) Changes in the nature and volume  of  the portfolio and in the  terms of loans

(cid:127) Changes  in  the  volume  and  severity  of  past  due  loans,  the  volume  of  non-accrual  loans,  and  the

volume and severity of adversely classified or  graded loans

(cid:127) The  existence  and  effect  of  any  concentrations  of  credit,  and  changes  in  the  level  of  such

concentrations

(cid:127) Changes  in  lending  policies  and  procedures,  including  changes  in  underwriting  standards  and
collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses

(cid:127) Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and  other  relevant staff

(cid:127) Changes in the Loan Review Methodology and Degree of Oversight by Bank’s Board of Directors.

(cid:127) Changes  in  international,  national,  regional,  and  local  economic  and  business  conditions  and
developments  that  affect  the  collectability  of  the  portfolio,  including  the  condition  of  various
market segments

(cid:127) The effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on

the level of estimated credit losses in the institution’s existing portfolio

(cid:127) Changes in the value of underlying  collateral  for collateral-dependent  loans

Portfolio  risk  includes  the  levels  and  trends  in  delinquencies,  impaired  loans,  changes  in  the  loan
rating  matrix  and  trends  in  volume  and  terms  of  loans.  Management  is  satisfied  with  the  stability  of  the
past  due  and  non-performing  loans  and  believes  there  has  been  no  decline  in  the  quality  of  the  loan
portfolio due to any trend in delinquent or adversely classified loans. In determining the adequacy of the
allowance,  management  considers  any  deterioration  of  asset  quality  in  DNB’s  commercial  mortgage  and
residential  first  mortgage  portfolios.  New  appraisal  values  we  have  obtained  for  existing  loans  have
generally been consistent with trends indicated by Case-Schiller and  other indices.

DNB  closely  monitors  the  loan  to  value  ratios  of  all  classified  assets  and  requires  periodic  current
appraisals  to  monitor  underlying  collateral  values.  Management  also  reviews  borrower,  sponsorship  and
guarantor’s financial strength along with their ability and willingness to provide financial support of their
obligations on an immediate and continuing basis.

The provision for credit losses increased to $1.7 million in 2017, compared to $730,000 in 2016. DNB’s
percentage  of  allowance  for  credit  losses  to  total  loans  was  0.69%  at  December  31,  2017  compared  to
0.66%  as  of  December  31,  2016.  Loans  acquired  in  connection  with  the  purchase  of  ERB  have  been
recorded at fair value, in accordance with GAAP, and are based on an initial estimate of the expected cash
flows, including a reduction for estimated credit losses, and without carryover of the respective portfolio’s
historical  allowance  for  credit  losses.  DNB  will  continually  evaluate  the  loans  acquired  from  ERB  for
additional impairment as part of our normal allowance review process. Net charge-offs were $1.2 million in
2017, compared to $292,000 in 2016. The percentage of net charge-offs to total average loans was 0.15% in
2017, compared to 0.05% in 2016. Management is not aware of any potential problem loans, which were
accruing and current at December 31, 2017, where serious doubt exists as to the ability of the borrower to
comply  with the present repayment terms and  that would result in a significant loss to DNB.

55

We  typically  establish  a  general  valuation  allowance  on  classified  loans  which  are  not  impaired.  In
establishing  the  general  valuation  allowance,  we  segregate  these  loans  by  loan  type.  For  commercial  and
construction  loans,  the  determination  of  the  category  for  each  loan  is  based  on  periodic  reviews  of  each
loan  by  our  lending  and  credit  officers  as  well  as  an  independent,  third-party  consultant.  The  reviews
include  a  consideration  of  such  factors  as  recent  payment  history,  current  financial  data,  cash  flow,
financial  projections,  collateral  evaluations,  guarantor  or  sponsorship  financial  strength  and  current
economic and business conditions. Categories for mortgage and consumer loans are determined through a
similar review. Classification of a loan within a category is based on identified weaknesses that increase the
credit risk of loss on the loan. The allowance percentage, is determined based on inherent losses associated
with each type of lending as determined through consideration of our loss history with each type of loan,
trends  in  credit  quality  and  collateral  values,  and  an  evaluation  of  current  economic  and  business
conditions.

We  establish  a  general  allowance  on  non-classified  loans  to  recognize  the  inherent  losses  associated
with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem
loans.  This  general  valuation  allowance  is  determined  by  segregating  the  loans  by  loan  category  and
assigning allowance percentages to each category. An evaluation of each category is made to determine the
need  to  further  segregate  the  loans  within  each  category  by  type.  For  our  residential  mortgage  and
consumer  loan  portfolios,  we  treat  them  as  homogeneous  pools.  For  our  commercial  real  estate  and
construction loan portfolios, a further analysis is made in which we segregated the loans by type based on
the purpose of the loan and the collateral properties securing the loan. Various risk factors for each type of
loan  are  considered,  including  the  impact  of  general  economic  and  business  conditions,  collateral  value
trends,  credit quality trends and historical  loss experience.

As  of  December  31,  2017,  DNB  had  $12.6  million  of  non-performing  assets,  which  included
$7.6 million of non-performing loans and $5.0 million of OREO and other repossessed property. Loans are
reviewed for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35. Impaired loans can either be secured or
unsecured, not including large groups of smaller balance loans that are collectively evaluated. Impairment
is  measured  by  the  difference  between  the  loan  amount  and  the  present  value  of  the  future  cash  flow
discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Management measures loans for impairment by using the
fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans. In general, management reduces the amount of the
appraisal  by  the  estimated  cost  of  acquisition  and  disposition  of  the  underlying  collateral  and  compares
that adjusted value with DNB’s carrying value. DNB establishes a specific valuation allowance on impaired
loans that have a collateral shortfall, including estimated costs to sell in comparison to the carrying value of
the  loan.  Of  the  $9.1  million  of  impaired  loans  ($7.6  million  of  non-performing  loans,  $1.0  million  of
performing  TDRs,  and  a  $520,000  performing  ASC  310-30  loan)  at  December  31,  2017,  $491,000  had  a
valuation allowance of $157,000 and $8.6 million had no specific allowance. For those impaired loans that
management determined that no specific valuation allowance was necessary, management has reviewed the
appraisal for each loan and determined that there is no shortfall in the collateral. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, DNB recognized $1.32 million in total charge-offs, $1.26 million of which related to
impaired loans.

We typically order new third-party appraisals or collateral valuations when a loan becomes impaired
or is transferred to OREO. This is done within two weeks of a loan becoming impaired or a loan moving to
OREO. It generally takes two to eight weeks to receive the appraisals, depending on the type of property
being  appraised.  We  recognize  any  provision  or  related  charge-off  within  two  weeks  of  receiving  the
appraisal  after  the  appraisal  has  been  reviewed  by  DNB.  We  generally  order  a  new  appraisal  for  all
impaired  real  estate  loans  having  a  balance  of  $100,000  or  higher,  every  twelve  months,  unless
management  determines  more  frequent  appraisals  are  necessary.  We  use  updated  valuations  when  time
constraints do not permit a full appraisal process, to reflect rapidly changing market conditions. Because
appraisals and updated valuations utilize historical data in reaching valuation conclusions, the appraised or
updated  value  may  or  may  not  reflect  the  actual  sales  price  that  we  will  receive  at  the  time  of  sale.

56

Management  uses  the  qualitative  factor  ‘‘Changes  in  the  value  of  underlying  collateral  for  collateral-
dependent loans’’ to establish reserves.

Real  estate  appraisals  typically  include  up  to  three  approaches  to  value:  the  sales  comparison
approach, the income approach (for income-producing property) and the cost approach. Not all appraisals
utilize all three approaches to value. Depending on the nature of the collateral and market conditions, the
appraiser may emphasize one approach over  another in determining  the fair value of collateral.

Appraisals  may  also  contain  different  estimates  of  value  based  on  the  level  of  occupancy  or  future
improvements. ‘‘As-is’’ valuations represent an estimate of value based on current market conditions with
no changes to the collateral’s use or condition. ‘‘As-stabilized’’ or ‘‘as-completed’’ valuations assume that
the collateral is improved to a stated standard or achieves its highest and best use in terms of occupancy.
‘‘As-stabilized’’  valuations  may  be  subject  to  a  present  value  adjustment  for  market  conditions  or  the
schedule for improvements.

In connection with the valuation process, we will typically develop an exit strategy for the collateral by
assessing overall market conditions, the current condition and use of the asset and its highest and best use.
For most income- producing real estate, investors value most highly a stable income stream from the asset;
consequently, we conduct a comparative evaluation to determine whether conducting a sale on an ‘‘as-is’’
basis or on an ‘‘as-stabilized’’ basis is most likely to produce the highest net realizable value and compare
these values with the costs incurred and the holding period necessary to achieve the ‘‘as stabilized’’ value.

Our estimates of the net realizable value of collateral include a deduction for the expected costs to sell
the collateral or such other deductions as deemed appropriate. For most real estate collateral, we apply a
seven to ten percent deduction to the value of real estate collateral to determine its expected costs to sell
the  asset.  This  estimate  generally  includes  real  estate  commissions,  one  year  of  real  estate  taxes  and
miscellaneous repair and closing costs. If we receive a purchase offer that requires unbudgeted repairs, or
if  the  expected  holding  period  for  the  asset  exceeds  one  year,  then  we  include  the  additional  real  estate
taxes and repairs or other holding costs in the expected costs to sell the collateral on a case-by-case basis.

57

Analysis of Allowance for Credit Losses
(Dollars in thousands)

Beginning balance
Provisions
Loans charged off:

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Lease financing
Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total charged off

Recoveries:

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Lease financing
Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total recoveries

Net charge-offs

Ending balance

2017

Year Ended December 31
2014
2015
2016

2013

$ 5,373
1,660

$ 4,935
730

$ 4,906
1,105

$4,623
1,130

$ 6,838
2,530

(85)
(519)

(683)
—
—

—
(38)

(206)
(39)

(45)
—
—

—
(21)

(194)
(105)

(200)
(581)
—

(11)
(63)

(326)
(8)

(47)
(511)
(1)

—
(82)

(183)
(716)

(247)
(3,648)
(26)

—
(70)

(1,325)

(311)

(1,154)

(975)

(4,890)

16
51

23
42
1

—
2

135

13
—

1
1
3

—
1

19

4
—

13
10
49

—
2

78

5
—

3
103
8

—
9

128

80
—

5
—
59

—
1

145

(1,190)

(292)

(1,076)

(847)

(4,745)

$ 5,843

$ 5,373

$ 4,935

$4,906

$ 4,623

Reserve for unfunded loan commitments

$

348

$

345

$

188

$ 166

$

143

Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans

0.15%

0.05% 0.23% 0.19% 1.20%

58

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  composition  of  DNB’s  allowance  for  credit  losses  at  the  dates

indicated.

Composition of Allowance for Credit Losses
(Dollars in thousands)

2017

December 31

2016

2015

2014

2013

Percent of
Loan Type
to Total
Loans

Percent of
Loan Type
to Total
Loans

Amount

Percent  of
Loan Type
to Total
Loans

Amount

Percent of
Loan Type
to Total
Loans

Percent  of
Loan Type
to Total
Loans

Amount

Amount

11% $ 349
2,531
57

11% $ 216
2,375
57

6% $ 269
2,300
57

6% $ 285
2,010
56

6%
56

15
9

7
1
—

709
969

196
61
558

15
9

7
1
—

989
569

195
64
527

21
4

11
1
—

709
881

189
70
488

18
8

11
1
—

621
1,073

156
78
440

21
5

10
2
—

Amount

$ 221
2,856

845
1,128

183
63
547

$5,843

100% $5,373

100% $4,935

100% $4,906

100% $4,623

100%

$ 348

$ 345

$ 188

$ 166

$ 143

Residential mortgage
Commercial  mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial  term
Commercial  construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other
Unallocated

Total

Reserve for unfunded loan
commitments (other
liability)

5. Certain Regulatory Matters

Dividends  payable  to  DNB  by  the  Bank  are  subject  to  certain  regulatory  limitations.  Under  normal
circumstances,  the  payment  of  dividends  in  any  year  without  regulatory  permission  is  limited  to  the  net
profits  (as  defined  for  regulatory  purposes)  for  that  year,  plus  the  retained  net  profits  for  the  preceding
two  calendar  years.  The  sum  of  these  items  amounted  to  $6.7  million  for  the  year  ended  December  31,
2017.  The  OCC  approved  a  special  dividend  request  for  $10.0  million  on  August  16,  2016  in  connection
with the consummation of the East River transaction.

The  FDIC  has  authority  to  assess  and  change  federal  deposit  insurance  assessment  rates  based  on
average consolidated assets, less tangible equity capital of the Bank. For further information, please refer
to  the  discussion  of  FDIC  deposit  insurance  assessments  under  Part  I,  Item  1  (‘‘Business’’),  section  (c)
(‘‘Narrative Description of Business’’) — ‘‘Supervision and Regulation — Bank’’ under the heading ‘‘FDIC
Insurance and Assessments’’ in this report. DNB’s  FDIC insurance expense  was $602,000 in  2017.

DNB was well capitalized at December 31, 2017 and met all regulatory capital requirements. Please
refer  to  Note  18  to  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for  a  table  that  summarizes  required  capital
ratios and the corresponding regulatory  capital  positions of  DNB and the Bank at  December 31, 2017.

At  December  31,  2017,  DNB  owned  $5.2  million  of  Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  of  Pittsburgh
(‘‘FHLBP’’)  stock,  $2.3  million  of  Federal  Reserve  Bank  (‘‘FRB’’)  stock,  and  $156,000  of  Atlantic
Community Bankers Bank (‘‘ACBB’’) stock totaling $7.6 million of restricted stock. DNB had outstanding
borrowings  of  $79.0  million  and  outstanding  letters  of  credit  of  $65.0  million  from  the  FHLBP.  DNB
recognized  dividend  income  of  $197,000  on  FHLBP  stock  and  $119,000  on  FRB  stock  in  2017.  At
December 31, 2017, DNB’s excess borrowing capacity from the FHLBP was $456.9 million.

6. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding, such
as guarantees and commitments to extend credit, borrow money or act in a fiduciary capacity, which are

59

not  reflected  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  Management  does  not  anticipate  any  significant
losses as a result of these commitments.

DNB had outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaling $4.6 million and unfunded loan and lines of

credit commitments totaling $176.6 million  at December 31, 2017.

These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the
amount recognized on the balance sheet. The exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by
the  party  to  the  financial  instrument  for  commitments  to  extend  credit  and  stand-by  letters  of  credit,  is
represented by the contractual amount. Management uses the same credit policies in making commitments
and conditional obligations as it does  for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of
any  condition  established  in  the  contract.  Commitments  generally  have  fixed  expiration  dates  or  other
termination  clauses  and  may  require  the  payment  of  a  fee.  DNB  evaluates  each  customer’s
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral, if any, obtained upon the extension of
credit, usually consists of real estate,  but may include securities, property  or other assets.

Stand-by letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by DNB to guarantee the performance
or repayment of a financial obligation of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued
to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risks involved in issuing letters of credit
are  essentially  the  same  as  those  involved  in  extending  loan  facilities  to  customers.  DNB  holds  various
forms of collateral to support these commitments.

DNB  maintains  borrowing  arrangements  with  various  correspondent  banks,  the  FHLBP  and  the
Federal  Reserve  Bank  of  Philadelphia  to  meet  short-term  liquidity  needs.  Through  these  relationships,
DNB has available credit of approximately $516.9 million at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017,
DNB had $79.0 million of FHLBP borrowings outstanding and the FHLBP had issued letters of credit, on
DNB’s behalf, totaling $65.0 million  against  its  available  credit lines.

As  of  December  31,  2017,  approximately  $252.8  million  of  assets  are  held  by  DNB  First  Wealth
Management in a fiduciary, custody or agency capacity. These assets are not assets of DNB, and are not
included in the consolidated financial  statements.

Off Balance Sheet Obligations
(Dollars in thousands)

Total

Expiration by Period
1-3
Years

Less than
1 Year

3-5
Years

More than
5 Years

Commitments to extend credit
Letters  of credit

Total

$176,556
4,584

$30,559
3,877

$25,156
132

$2,778
—

$118,063
575

$181,140

$34,436

$25,288

$2,778

$118,638

For detailed information regarding FHLBP Advances and Short Term Borrowed Funds, see Note 8 to

the Consolidated Financial Statements.

60

The  following  table  sets  forth  DNB’s  known  contractual  obligations  as  of  December  31,  2017.  The

amounts presented below do not include interest.

Contractual Obligations
(Dollars in thousands)

FHLBP advances
Time deposits
Brokered deposits
Repurchase agreements
Capital lease obligations
Operating lease obligations
Long-term subordinated debt
Junior subordinated debentures

Payments Due by Period
3-5
1-3
Years
Years

Less than
1 Year

More than
5 Years

$ 46,078
104,359
4,050
12,023
60
1,113
—
—

$25,935
31,961
27,810
—
148
1,832
—
—

$ 7,000
4,170
9,952
—
158
1,091
—
—

$ —
—
—
—
—
194
9,750
9,279

Total

$ 79,013
140,490
41,812
12,023
366
4,230
9,750
9,279

Total

$296,963

$167,683

$87,686

$22,371

$19,223

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative  Disclosures About Market Risk

To measure the impacts of longer-term asset and liability mismatches beyond two years, DNB utilizes
an Economic Value of Equity (‘‘EVE’’) model. The EVE model measures the potential price risk of equity
to changes in interest rates and factors in the optionality included on the balance sheet. EVE analysis is
used to dynamically model the present value of asset and liability cash flows, with rates ranging up or down
200 basis points. The EVE is likely to be different if rates change. Results falling outside prescribed ranges
may  require  action  by  management.  At  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  DNB’s  variance  in  the  EVE  as  a
percentage  of  assets  with  an  instantaneous  and  sustained  parallel  shift  of  200  basis  points  was  within  its
negative 3% guideline, as shown in the following table. The change as a percentage of the present value of
equity with a 200 basis point increase was within DNB’s negative 25% guideline at December 31, 2017 and
2016.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
(Dollars in thousands)

Change in rates

EVE
Change
Change as a % of assets
Change as a % of PV equity

December 31, 2017

December 31, 2016

Flat

$129,535

(cid:4)200bp +200bp
$123,710
$120,945
(5,825)
(8,590)

Flat

$118,298

(cid:4)200bp +200bp
$114,771
$111,279
(3,527)
(7,019)

(0.8)%
(6.6)%

(0.5)%
(4.5)%

(0.7)%
(5.9)%

(0.3)%
(3.0)%

61

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Assets
Cash and due from banks

Cash and cash equivalents

Available-for-sale investment securities  at fair value  (amortized  cost  of $113,555  and  $116,830)
Held-to-maturity investment securities  (fair value of $62,420 and  $66,124)

Total investment securities

Loans held for sale
Loans
Allowance for credit losses

Net loans

Restricted stock
Office property and  equipment, net
Accrued interest  receivable
Other real estate  owned  &  other  repossessed  property
Bank owned life  insurance  (BOLI)
Core deposit intangible
Goodwill
Net deferred taxes
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’  Equity
Liabilities
Non-interest-bearing  deposits
Interest-bearing  deposits:

NOW
Money market
Savings
Time
Brokered deposits

Total deposits

Federal Home Loan Bank  of  Pittsburgh  (FHLBP)  advances
Repurchase agreements
Junior subordinated  debentures
Subordinated debt
Other borrowings

Total borrowings

Accrued interest  payable
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $1.00  par value; 20,000,000  shares authorized; 4,362,939  and  4,334,352  issued,

respectively; 4,286,117  and 4,240,778  outstanding, respectively

Treasury stock, at cost; 76,822  and 93,574 shares, respectively
Surplus
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

62

December 31

2017

2016

$

10,917

$

22,103

10,917

111,783
62,390

174,173

651
845,897
(5,843)

840,054

7,641
8,649
3,822
5,012
9,314
435
15,525
2,980
2,742

22,103

115,184
67,022

182,206

—
817,529
(5,373)

812,156

5,381
9,243
3,567
2,767
9,552
537
15,590
5,250
2,333

$1,081,915

$1,070,685

$ 176,815

$ 173,467

199,310
221,726
81,050
140,490
41,812

861,203

79,013
12,023
9,279
9,750
2,738

112,803

554
5,413

224,219
184,783
86,176
187,256
29,286

885,187

55,332
11,889
9,279
9,750
418

86,668

534
3,456

979,973

975,845

—

—

4,379
(1,429)
69,110
32,272
(2,390)

101,942

4,351
(1,730)
68,973
25,520
(2,274)

94,840

$1,081,915

$1,070,685

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share  data)

Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest  and fees on loans
Interest  and dividends on investment securities:

Taxable
Exempt from federal taxes

Interest  on cash and cash equivalents

Total interest and dividend income

Interest Expense:
Interest  on NOW, money market and savings
Interest  on time deposits
Interest  on brokered deposits
Interest  on FHLBP advances
Interest  on repurchase agreements
Interest  on junior subordinated debentures
Interest  on subordinated debt
Interest  on other borrowings

Total interest expense

Net interest income
Provision for credit losses

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

Non-interest Income:
Service charges
Wealth management
Mortgage banking, net
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI
Gains on  sale  of investment securities, net
Gains on  sale  of loans
Gain from insurance proceeds
Other fees

Total non-interest income

Non-interest Expense:
Salaries and  employee benefits
Furniture and equipment
Occupancy
Professional and consulting
Advertising and marketing
Printing and  supplies
FDIC insurance
PA shares  tax
Telecommunications
Loss on sale or write down of OREO, net
Due diligence and merger expense
Other expenses

Total non-interest expense

Income before income tax expense
Income tax expense

Net  income

Earnings per common share:

Basic
Diluted

Cash dividends  per common share
Weighted  average common shares outstanding:

Basic
Diluted

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

63

Year Ended December  31

2017

2016

$

39,254

$

24,944

2,983
938
210

43,385

2,289
1,257
538
752
28
386
414
56

5,720

37,665
1,660

36,005

1,223
1,713
148
223
50
153
203
1,705

5,418

15,204
2,065
2,679
1,922
755
231
602
867
350
121
77
3,148

28,021

13,402
5,456

7,946

2,896
1,210
129

29,179

1,004
706
301
451
40
344
414
64

3,324

25,855
730

25,125

1,146
1,634
282
226
431
39
1,180
1,426

6,364

12,299
1,493
2,083
1,339
707
191
507
634
297
644
2,241
2,206

24,641

6,848
1,869

4,979

$
$
$

1.87
1.85
0.28

$
$
$

1.56
1.55
0.28

4,260,137
4,290,070

3,186,079
3,218,884

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive  Income
(Dollars in thousands)

Net income
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Unrealized holding losses on AFS investment securities arising during the

period

Before tax amount
Tax  effect

Accretion of discount on AFS to HTM reclassification
Before tax amount(1)
Tax  effect(2)

Less reclassification for gains on sales of AFS  investment  securities included

in net income
Before tax amount(3)
Tax  effect(2)

Other comprehensive loss — securities

Unrealized actuarial (losses) gains — pension
Before tax amount
Tax  effect

Total other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive income

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$7,946

$4,979

(117)
40

(77)

8
(3)

5

(9)
3

(6)

(78)

(57)
19

(38)

(56)
19

(37)

9
(3)

6

(410)
139

(271)

(302)

20
(7)

13

(116)

(289)

$7,830

$4,690

(1) Amounts  are  included  in  ‘‘Interest  and  dividends  on  investment  securities’’  in  the  consolidated

statements of income.

(2) Amounts are included in ‘‘Income tax  expense’’  in the consolidated statements of income.

(3) Amounts are included in ‘‘Gains on sale of investment securities, net’’ in the consolidated statements

of income.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

64

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at  January 1, 2016

Net income
Other comprehensive loss
ERB acquisition (1,368,527 shares)
Restricted stock compensation expense (26,952 shares  vested)
Exercise of stock options (5,824 shares)
Shares withheld for employee taxes on stock option exercise

and share  award vest

Tax benefit for  restricted stock vest and stock option exercise
Cash dividends — common ($0.28 per share)
Sale of treasury shares to 401(k) (9,762 shares)
Sale of treasury shares to deferred comp. plan (5,873  shares)

Balance at December 31, 2016

Net income
Other comprehensive loss
Restricted stock compensation expense (13,839 shares  vested)
Exercise of stock options (14,748 shares)
Shares withheld for employee taxes on stock option exercise

and share  award vest

Cash dividends — common ($0.28 per share)
Sale of treasury shares to 401(k) (10,928 shares)
Sale of treasury shares to deferred comp. plan (5,824  shares)

Common Treasury

Stock

Stock

Retained
Surplus Earnings

$2,955
—
—
1,369
42
6

$(2,015) $35,097
—
—
—
—
— 33,337
898
—
(6)
—

$21,436
4,979
—
—
—
—

(21)
—
—
—
—

4,351
—
—
24
15

(11)
—
—
—

—
—
—
178
107

(1,730)
—
—
—
—

—
—
197
104

(680)
188
—
87
52

68,973
—
—
535
(15)

—
—
(895)
—
—

25,520
7,946
—
—
—

(624)

—
— (1,194)
—
155
—
86

Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Loss

$(1,985)
—
(289)
—
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

(2,274)
—
(116)
—
—

—
—
—
—

Total

$ 55,488
4,979
(289)
34,706
940
—

(701)
188
(895)
265
159

94,840
7,946
(116)
559
—

(635)
(1,194)
352
190

Balance at December 31, 2017

$4,379

$(1,429) $69,110

$32,272

$(2,390)

$101,942

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

65

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net  cash provided  by operating  activities:

Depreciation, amortization and  accretion
Provision for credit  losses
Stock based compensation
Net gain on  sale of securities
Net loss on sale and  write  down of  OREO  and other  repossessed property
Gain on insurance  proceeds
Earnings from investment  in  BOLI
Deferred tax expense
Proceeds from sales of mortgage  loans
Mortgage loans  originated for sale
Gain on sale of  mortgage loans
Proceeds from sales of loans
Loans originated for  sale
Gain on sale of  loans
Increase in accrued interest receivable
(Increase) decrease in  other  assets
Increase in accrued interest payable
Increase (decrease) in  other  liabilities
Net Cash Provided  By Operating Activities
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Activity in available-for-sale securities:

Sales
Maturities, repayments  and calls
Purchases

Activity in held-to-maturity securities:

Sales
Maturities, repayments  and calls
Purchases

Net cash disbursed in connection with  acquisition
Net (increase) decrease  in restricted  stock
Net increase in loans
Proceeds from insurance company
Death benefit proceeds
Purchases of office  property and equipment
Expenses capitalized in OREO
Proceeds from sale of OREO and other  repossessed property
Net Cash (Used in) Provided  by  Investing  Activities
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
Repayment of FHLBP advances
Funding of FHLBP advances
Net increase (decrease)  in repurchase  agreements
Increase (decrease) in  other  borrowings
Dividends paid
Payment of employee  taxes on stock  option exercise  and share  award vest
Tax benefit for restricted  stock vesting
Sale of treasury stock
Net Cash Provided  By (Used In) Financing Activities
Net Change in Cash and Cash  Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents at  Beginning  of Period
Cash and Cash Equivalents  at  End of Period
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash  Flow  Information:
Cash paid during the period  for:
Interest
Income taxes
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash  Flow  Information:
Net decrease in goodwill
Transfers from loans  to other real estate  owned  and other  repossessed property
Assets, Liabilities, and  Equity  in  Connection  with Merger  (Noncash):

Assets acquired:

Investment securities
Loans
Goodwill
Core deposit intangible
Other assets

Liabilities assumed:

Deposits
FHLBP  advances
Other liabilities

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

66

Year Ended
December 31

2017

2016

$ 7,946

$

4,979

1,649
1,660
559
(50)
121
(203)
(223)
2,329
5,710
(6,213)
(148)
2,403
(2,250)
(153)
(255)
(405)
20
1,899
14,396

3,030
30,201
(30,352)

737
5,442
(1,407)
—
(2,260)
(32,453)
—
664
(642)
(15)
609
(26,446)

(23,984)
(46,167)
69,848
134
2,320
(1,194)
(635)
—
542
864
(11,186)
22,103
$ 10,917

1,622
730
940
(431)
644
(1,180)
(226)
344
11,682
(11,400)
(282)
564
(525)
(39)
(59)
4,859
60
(1,772)
10,510

43,913
55,195
(59,646)

761
13,647
(13,507)
(5,488)
999
(29,693)
1,180
—
(3,181)
(1,236)
432
3,376

51,759
(43,104)
—
(20,527)
(46)
(895)
(701)
188
424
(12,902)
984
21,119
$ 22,103

$ 5,700
3,511

$

3,264
1,175

65
2,960

—
26

$

$

$

$

— $ 3,027
306,396
—
15,590
—
508
—
10,838
—
— $336,359

— $227,153
68,436
—
—
576
— $296,165

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

DNB  Financial  Corporation  (the  ‘‘Corporation’’  or  ‘‘DNB’’)  through  its  wholly  owned  subsidiary,
DNB  First,  National  Association  (the  ‘‘Bank’’),  formerly  Downingtown  National  Bank,  has  been  serving
individuals  and  small  to  medium  sized  businesses  of  southeastern  Pennsylvania  since  1860.  DNB  Capital
Trust  I  and  II  are  special  purpose  Delaware  business  trusts,  which  are  not  consolidated  as  they  are
considered  variable  interest  entities  and  the  Corporation  is  not  the  primary  beneficiary  (see  additional
discussion  in  Junior  Subordinated  Debentures  —  Note  10).  The  Bank  is  a  locally  managed  commercial
bank providing personal and commercial loans and deposit products, in addition to investment and trust
services from fifteen community offices. The Bank encounters vigorous competition for market share from
commercial banks, thrift institutions,  credit unions and other financial intermediaries.

The  consolidated  financial  statements  of  DNB  and  its  subsidiary,  the  Bank,  which  together  are
managed  as  a  single  operating  segment  (‘‘Community  Banking’’),  are  prepared  in  accordance  with  U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles  applicable to the banking  industry.

In  preparing  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  management  is  required  to  make  estimates  and
assumptions  that  affect  the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities,  the  disclosure  of  contingent  assets
and  liabilities  at  the  date  of  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Financial  Condition,  and  the  reported
amounts  of  revenues  and  expenses  during  the  reporting  period.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  these
estimates.  Amounts  subject  to  significant  estimates  are  items  such  as  the  allowance  for  credit  losses  and
lending related commitments, the fair value of repossessed assets, pension and post-retirement obligations,
the  fair  value  of  financial  instruments,  other-than-temporary  impairments  of  investment  securities,  the
valuation  of  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  assumed  in  business  combinations,  and  the  valuations  of
goodwill  for  impairment.  Among  other  effects,  such  changes  could  result  in  future  impairments  of
investment securities, and establishment of allowances for credit losses and lending related commitments
as  well  as  increased  benefit  plans’  expenses.  The  comparability  of  the  financial  condition  of  DNB  as  of
December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, and the results of operations for the year ended 2017
compared  to  2016,  in  general,  have  been  impacted  by  the  acquisition  of  ERB  on  October  1,  2016.  The
assets and liabilities of ERB were recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at their established fair value
as  of  October  1,  2016,  and  their  results  of  operations  have  been  included  in  the  consolidated  income
statement since that date.

Accounting Developments Affecting DNB In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, ‘‘Revenue
from  Contracts  with  Customers  (Topic  606).’’  The  updated  standard  is  a  new  comprehensive  revenue
recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner that depicts the transfer of goods or
services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for
those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of
ASU 2014-09 by one year. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued ASU Nos. 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20,
and  2017-13  that  provides  additional  guidance  related  to  the  identification  of  performance  obligations
within a contract, assessing collectability, contract costs, and other technical corrections and improvements.

DNB adopted the new standards effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach.
A  significant  majority  of  DNB’s  revenues  are  explicitly  excluded  from  the  scope  of  the  new  guidance
including interest, dividend income, BOLI, gain/loss on sale of loans and investments on the Consolidated
Statements  of  Income.  The  adoption  of  ASU  2014-09  did  not  require  a  cumulative  adjustment  to  the
opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 and is not expected to have a material impact
on DNB’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, Comprehensive Income, Stockholders’ Equity
or  Cash  Flows  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2018.  Non-interest  income  components  in  the  scope  of
Topic 606 continue to be recognized when DNB’s performance obligations are complete or at the time of
sale  after  a  customer’s  transaction  posts  in  the  account.  The  Company  continues  to  evaluate  related
changes to interim and year end disclosures that will be required  in 2018.

67

DNB adopted ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805), in 2016: Simplifying the Accounting
for Measurement Period Adjustments on a prospective basis. This amendment eliminates the requirement
to  account  for  adjustments  to  provisional  amounts  recognized  in  a  business  combination  retrospectively.
Instead, the acquirer will recognize the adjustments to provisional amounts during the period in which the
adjustments  are  determined,  including  the  effect  on  earnings  of  any  amounts  the  acquirer  would  have
recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. DNB evaluated
the  impact  of  this  guidance  and  concluded  there  is  no  material  impact  to  the  consolidated  financial
statements at this time.

In  January  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2016-01,  adopted  January  1,  2018,  Financial
Instruments  —  Overall  (Subtopic  825-10)  —  Recognition  and  Measurement  of  Financial  Assets  and
Financial  Liabilities.  The  guidance  addresses  certain  aspects  of  recognition,  measurement,  presentation
and disclosure of financial instruments. In particular, the guidance revises an entity’s accounting related to
(1)  the  classification  and  measurement  of  investments  in  equity  securities  and  (2)  the  presentation  of
certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The guidance also amends certain
disclosure requirements associated with fair value of financial instruments. For public business entities, the
guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. Entities should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the
balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. As of December 31, 2017, DNB did not
hold  any  equity  investments  (excluding  restricted  investments  in  bank  stocks  that  do  not  have  a  readily
determinable  market  value).  DNB  does  not  expect  to  make  significant  purchases  of  equity  investments;
therefore,  the  adoption  of  this  ASU  is  not  expected  to  be  material  to  DNB’s  consolidated  financial
statements.

In  February  2016,  the  FASB  issued  Accounting  Standards  Update  No.  2016-02,  Leases.  The  new
standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease
liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as
either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income
statement.  The  new  standard  is  effective  for  fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15,  2018,  including
interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years.  A  modified  retrospective  transition  approach  is  required  for
lessees  for  capital  and  operating  leases  existing  at,  or  entered  into  after,  the  beginning  of  the  earliest
comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. DNB
has  determined  that  upon  the  adoption  of  ASU  2016-02  we  will  be  required  to  recognize  a  right-of-use
asset and a corresponding liability based on the then present value of such obligation. DNB is preparing an
inventory  of  its  leases  and  evaluating  the  impact  of  this  ASU  on  these  leases.  Upon  adoption  of  the
guidance,  DNB  expects  to  report  increased  assets  and  increased  liabilities  as  a  result  of  recognizing
right-of-use  assets  and  lease  liabilities  on  its  consolidated  statement  of  condition.  DNB  is  currently
evaluating the extent of the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial
statements.

In  March  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  2016-09,  ‘‘Improvements  to  Employee  Share-Based  Payment
Accounting.’’  This  ASU  simplifies  several  aspects  of  the  accounting  for  employee  share-based  payment
transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities,
and  classification  on  the  statement  of  cash  flows.  For  public  business  entities,  this  ASU  is  effective  for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein.
Accordingly,  effective  January  of  2017,  DNB  adopted  the  pronouncement.  During  the  year  ended
December  31,  2017,  DNB  had  $331,000  of  tax  benefits  for  stock  option  exercises  and  restricted  stock
vesting. In accordance with ASU 2016-09, forfeitures are recognized as they occur instead of applying an
estimated  forfeiture  rate  to  each  grant.  For  purposes  of  the  determination  of  stock-based  compensation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized actual forfeitures of 230 shares of restricted
stock awards that were granted to officers and other employees.

68

In  June  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2016-13,  ‘‘Financial  Instruments  —  Credit  Losses
(Topic  326):  Measurement  of  Credit  Losses  on  Financial  Instruments,’’  (ASU  2016-13),  which  addresses
concerns  regarding  the  perceived  delay  in  recognition  of  credit  losses  under  the  existing  incurred  loss
model.  The  amendment  introduces  a  new,  single  model  for  recognizing  credit  losses  on  all  financial
instruments presented on cost basis. Under the new model, entities must estimate current expected credit
losses  by  considering  all  available  relevant  information,  including  historical  and  current  information,  as
well  as  reasonable  and  supportable  forecasts  of  future  events.  The  update  also  requires  additional
qualitative  and  quantitative  information  to  allow  users  to  better  understand  the  credit  risk  within  the
portfolio  and  the  methodologies  for  determining  allowance.  ASU  2016-13  is  effective  for  DNB  on
January  1,  2020  and  must  be  applied  using  the  modified  retrospective  approach  with  limited  exceptions.
Early  adoption  is  permitted.  Although  early  adoption  is  permitted  for  fiscal  years  beginning  after
December  15,  2018,  DNB  does  not  plan  to  early  adopt.  DNB  has  established  a  CECL  Implementation
Team to assess the impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash
flows.  DNB  has  been  preserving  certain  historical  loan  information  from  its  core  processing  system  in
anticipation of adopting the standard and will be evaluating control and process framework, data, model,
and resource requirements and areas where modifications will be required. The team continues to assess
the  impact  of  the  standard;  however,  DNB  expects  adopting  this  ASU  will  result  in  an  increase  in  its
allowance for credit losses. The amount  of  the increase  in the allowance for credit  losses upon adoption
will be dependent upon the characteristics of the portfolio at the adoption date, as well as macroeconomic
conditions and forecasts at that date. A cumulative effect adjustment will be made to retained earnings for
the impact of the standard at the beginning  of  the period  the standard is adopted.

In  August  2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2016-15,  Statement  of  Cash  Flows  (Topic  230).  The
amendments  in  this  update  provide  guidance  for  eight  specific  cash  flow  classification  issues  for  which
current guidance is unclear or does not exist, thereby reducing diversity in practice. For public companies,
the  update  is  effective  for  annual  periods  beginning  after  December  15,  2017.  Accordingly,  effective
January  1,  2018,  DNB  adopted  the  pronouncement  and  it  does  not  have  a  material  impact  to  DNB’s
consolidated financial statements.

In  January  2017,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2017-01,  Business  Combinations  (Topic  805),  Clarifying
the Definition of a Business. The new guidance narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a
framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of
assets or a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the
gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if
so,  the  set  of  transferred  assets  and  activities  (collectively,  the  set)  is  not  a  business.  To  be  considered  a
business,  the  set  would  need  to  include  an  input  and  a  substantive  process  that  together  significantly
contribute  to  the  ability  to  create  outputs,  as  defined  by  the  ASU.  The  guidance  is  effective  for  annual
reporting  periods  beginning  after  December  15,  2017,  including  interim  periods  within  those  annual
reporting periods, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. DNB will apply this
guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.

In  January  2017,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (‘‘FASB’’)  issued  ASU  2017-04,
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The ASU
simplifies  the  subsequent  measurement  of  goodwill  by  eliminating  Step  2  from  the  goodwill  impairment
test. Instead, under the amendments, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment
test by comparing the fair value with its carrying amount. Additionally, an entity should consider income
tax  effects  from  any  tax  deductible  goodwill  on  the  carrying  amount  when  measuring  the  goodwill
impairment loss, if applicable. The update also eliminated the requirements for zero or negative carrying
amount  to  perform  a  qualitative  assessment  and,  if  it  fails  that  qualitative  test,  to  perform  Step  2  of  the
goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for public business entities for its annual or any
interim  goodwill  impairment  tests  in  fiscal  years  beginning  after  December  15,  2019.  Early  adoption  is
permitted  for  interim  or  annual  goodwill  impairment  tests  performed  on  testing  dates  after  January  1,

69

2017.  DNB  will  not  early  adopt  this  ASU  for  its  annual  goodwill  impairment  test,  and  has  conducted  a
qualitative test (step zero) as of October 1, 2017 and determined that its Goodwill has not been impaired.
The  adoption  of  this  ASU  is  not  expected  to  have  a  material  impact  on  DNB’s  consolidated  financial
statements.

In  March  2017,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2017-07,  ‘‘Improving  the  Presentation  of  Net  Periodic
Pension  Cost  and  Net  Periodic  Postretirement  Benefit  Cost.’’  Under  the  new  guidance,  employers  will
present the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item
(e.g., Salaries and Benefits) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during
the  period.  In  addition,  only  the  service  cost  component  will  be  eligible  for  capitalization  in  assets.
Employers will present the other components separately (e.g., Other Noninterest Expense) from the line
item that includes the service cost. ASU No. 2017-07 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, however, DNB has decided not to early
adopt.  Employers  will  apply  the  guidance  on  the  presentation  of  the  components  of  net  periodic  benefit
cost in the income statement retrospectively. ASU No. 2017-07 does not have a material impact on DNB
Consolidated  Financial  Statements  because  the  Pension  plan  has  been  frozen  to  new  accruals  since
December 31, 2003, and thus, generated  no service cost in any subsequent year.

In March of 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, ‘‘Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other
Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities’’ (‘‘ASU 2017-08’’).
This  guidance  shortens  the  amortization  period  for  premiums  on  certain  callable  debt  securities  to  the
earliest  call  date  (with  an  explicit,  non-contingent  call  feature  that  is  callable  at  a  fixed  price  and  on  a
preset dates), rather than contractual maturity date as currently required under GAAP. The ASU does not
impact  instruments  without  preset  call  dates  such  as  mortgage-backed  securities.  For  instruments  with
contingent call features, once the contingency is resolved and the security is callable at a fixed price and
preset date, the security is within the scope of the ASU. ASU 2017-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after  December  15,  2018,  and  interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years,  and  early  adoption  is  permitted.
Accordingly, effective January of 2017, DNB early adopted the pronouncement. The adoption of the ASU
did not have a material impact to the  consolidated financial statements.

In  May  2017,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2017-09,  Compensation-Stock  Compensation  (Topic  718):
Scope  of  Modification  Accounting;  (‘‘ASU  2017-09’’).  ASU  2017-09  provides  clarity  by  offering  guidance
on  the  scope  of  modification  accounting  for  share-based  payment  awards  and  gives  direction  on  which
changes  to  the  terms  or  conditions  of  these  awards  require  an  entity  to  apply  modification  accounting.
Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions,
or  the  classification  of  the  award  (as  equity  or  liability)  changes  as  a  result  of  the  change  in  terms  or
conditions. The guidance was effective prospectively for all companies for annual periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2017. Early adoption was permitted. DNB adopted the ASU on January 1, 2018 and
the effects are immaterial.

In  February  2018,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2018-02,  Income  Statement-Reporting  Comprehensive
Income  (Topic  220):  Reclassification  of  Certain  Tax  Effects  from  Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive
Income; (‘‘ASU 2018-02’’). ASU 2018-02 states an entity may elect to reclassify the income tax effects of
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
The amendments in this update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018,  and  interim  periods  within  those  fiscal  years.  DNB  will  adopt  this  ASU  on  January  1,  2018.  The
amount of this reclassification is $471,000.

Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of DNB and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank. All significant inter-company transactions have been
eliminated.

70

Cash and Due From Banks For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and due
from banks, and federal funds sold are considered to be cash equivalents. Generally, federal funds are sold
for one-day periods.

Investment Securities

Investment securities are classified at the time of purchase and accounted for as

follows:

Held-To-Maturity  (‘‘HTM’’)  Includes  debt  securities  that  DNB  has  the  positive  intent  and  ability  to
hold to maturity. Debt securities are reported at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion
of discounts. DNB may sell HTM securities when DNB collects greater than 85% of the original recorded
investment on the HTM securities prior to the sale.

Available-For-Sale  (‘‘AFS’’)  Includes  debt  and  equity  securities  not  classified  as  HTM  securities.
Securities classified as AFS are securities that DNB intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but
not  necessarily  to  maturity.  Such  securities  are  reported  at  fair  value,  with  unrealized  holding  gains  and
losses  excluded  from  earnings  and  reported,  net  of  tax  (if  applicable),  as  a  separate  component  of
stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on the sale of AFS securities are computed on the basis of
specific  identification  of  the  adjusted  cost  of  each  security.  Amortization  of  premiums  and  accretion  of
discounts for  all types of securities are  computed  using  a level-yield  basis.

Other  Than  Temporary  Impairment  (‘‘OTTI’’)  Analysis  Securities  are  evaluated  on  a  quarterly  basis,
and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether declines in
their  value  are  other-than-temporary.  To  determine  whether  a  loss  in  value  is  other-than-temporary,
management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the
decline, and whether or not management intends to sell or expects that it is more likely than not that it will
be required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery of the fair value. Once a decline in value for
a  debt  security  is  determined  to  be  other-than-temporary,  the  other-than-temporary  impairment  is
separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash
flows  expected  to  be  collected  from  the  debt  security  (the  credit  loss)  and  (b)  the  amount  of  the  total
other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total impairment related
to credit losses is included in earnings. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is
included in other comprehensive income.  DNB recorded  no impairment  charges in 2017 or 2016.

Restricted Stock Restricted investment in bank stocks consist of Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank
(‘‘FRB’’) stock, Pittsburgh Federal Home Loan Bank (‘‘FHLBP’’) stock, and Atlantic Community Bankers
Bank (‘‘ACBB’’) stock. Federal law requires a member institution of the district FRB and FHLB to hold
stock according to predetermined formulas. ACBB requires its correspondent banking institutions to hold
stock as a condition of membership. The restricted investment in bank stock is carried at cost. Quarterly,
the Corporation evaluates the bank stocks for impairment. DNB evaluates recent and long-term operating
performance,  liquidity,  funding  and  capital  positions,  stock  repurchase  history,  dividend  history,  and
impact of legislative and regulatory changes. At December 31, 2017, DNB owned $5.2 million of stock of
the FHLBP, $2.3 million of stock of the FRB and $156,000 of stock of ACBB. At December 31, 2016, DNB
owned  $4.1  million  of  stock  of  the  FHLBP,  $1.1  million  of  stock  of  the  FRB  and  $156,000  of  stock  of
ACBB.

Loans Loans  receivable  that  management  has  the  intent  and  ability  to  hold  for  the  foreseeable
future  or  until  maturity  or  payoff  are  stated  at  their  outstanding  unpaid  principal  balances,  net  of  an
allowance  for  credit  losses  and  any  deferred  fees  or  costs.  Interest  income  is  accrued  on  the  unpaid
principal  balance.  Loan  origination  fees,  net  of  certain  direct  origination  costs,  are  deferred  and
recognized  as  an  adjustment  of  the  yield  (interest  income)  of  the  related  loans.  DNB  is  generally
amortizing  these  amounts  over  the  contractual  life  of  the  loan.  Premiums  and  discounts  on  purchased
loans are amortized as adjustments to interest income  using the effective  yield method.

71

The  loans  receivable  portfolio  is  segmented  into  residential  mortgage  loans,  commercial  mortgage
loans,  commercial  loans  (which  consist  of  commercial  term  loans  and  commercial  construction  loans),
leases, and consumer loans (which consist of home equity  loans and other consumer loans.)

For  all  classes  of  loans  receivable,  the  accrual  of  interest  is  generally  discontinued  when  the
contractual  payment  of  principal  or  interest  has  become  90  days  past  due  or  management  has  serious
doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A
loan  may  remain  on  accrual  status  if  it  is  in  the  process  of  collection  and  is  either  guaranteed  or  well
secured.  When  a  loan  or  lease  is  placed  on  non-accrual,  interest  accruals  cease  and  uncollected  accrued
interest is reversed and charged against current income. Interest received on nonaccrual loans, including
impaired  loans,  generally  is  either  applied  against  principal  or  reported  as  interest  income,  according  to
management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status
when  the  obligation  is  brought  current,  has  performed  in  accordance  with  the  contractual  terms  for  a
reasonable  period  of  time  (generally  six  months)  and  the  ultimate  collectability  of  the  total  contractual
principal  and  interest  is  no  longer  in  doubt.  The  past  due  status  of  all  classes  of  loans  receivable  is
determined based on contractual due  dates  for loan payments.

Loans  acquired  in  business  combinations  Loans  that  DNB  acquires  in  connection  with  business
combinations are recorded at fair value with no carryover of the existing related allowance for credit losses.
Fair  value  of  the  loans  involves  estimating  the  amount  and  timing  of  principal  and  interest  cash  flows
expected to be collected on the loans  and  discounting those cash flows  at a market rate of interest.

For loans acquired with credit deterioration, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the
estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized into interest income over the
remaining life of the loan. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the
cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable discount. These loans
are accounted for under the Accounting Standard Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities
Acquired  with  Deteriorated  Credit  Quality.  The  nonaccretable  discount  includes  estimated  future  credit
losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows
will  require  DNB  to  evaluate  the  need  for  an  additional  allowance  for  credit  losses.  Subsequent
improvement  in  expected  cash  flows  will  result  in  the  reversal  of  a  corresponding  amount  of  the
nonaccretable discount which DNB will then reclassify as accretable discount that will be recognized into
interest income over the remaining life  of  the  loan.

Loans  acquired  through  business  combinations  that  do  meet  the  specific  criteria  of  ASC  310-30  are
individually  evaluated  each  period  to  analyze  expected  cash  flows.  To  the  extent  that  the  expected  cash
flows of a loan have decreased due to credit deterioration, DNB establishes an  allowance.

Loans  acquired  through  business  combinations  that  do  not  meet  the  specific  criteria  of  ASC  310-30
are  accounted  for  under  ASC  310-20.  These  loans  are  initially  recorded  at  fair  value,  and  include  credit
and  interest  rate  marks  associated  with  acquisition  accounting  adjustments.  Purchase  premiums  or
discounts are subsequently amortized as an adjustment to yield over the estimated contractual lives of the
loans. There is no allowance for credit losses established at the acquisition date for acquired performing
loans. An allowance for credit losses is recorded for any credit deterioration in these loans subsequent to
acquisition.

Acquired loans that met the criteria for impaired or nonaccrual of interest prior to the acquisition may
be considered performing upon acquisition, regardless of whether the customer is contractually delinquent
if DNB expects to fully collect the new carrying value (i.e. fair value) of the loans. As such, DNB may no
longer  consider  the  loan  to  be  nonaccrual  or  nonperforming  and  may  accrue  interest  on  these  loans,
including  the  impact  of  any  accretable  discount.  In  addition,  charge-offs  on  such  loans  would  be  first
applied  to the nonaccretable difference  portion  of  the fair value adjustment.

72

Deferred  Loan  Fees  and  Costs Loan  origination  and  commitment  fees  and  related  direct-loan
origination costs of completed loans are deferred and accreted to income as a yield adjustment over the
life of the loan using the level-yield method. The accretion to income is discontinued when a loan is placed
on  non-accrual  status.  When  a  loan  is  paid  off,  any  unamortized  net  deferred  fee  balance  is  credited  to
income. When a loan is sold, any unamortized net deferred fee balance is considered in the calculation of
gain or loss.

Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of losses
inherent  in  the  loan  portfolio  as  of  the  balance  sheet  date  and  is  recorded  as  a  reduction  to  loans.  The
allowance for credit losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of
recoveries.  Loans  deemed  to  be  uncollectible  are  charged  against  the  allowance  for  credit  losses,  and
subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans
receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of
the principal balance is highly unlikely. Non-residential consumer loans are generally charged off no later
than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, earlier in the event of Bankruptcy, or if there is an amount
deemed uncollectible. No portion of the allowance for credit losses is restricted to any individual loan or
groups of loans, and the entire allowance  is available  to  absorb any and  all loan losses.

The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that
can  be  reasonably  anticipated.  Management  performs  a  quarterly  evaluation  of  the  adequacy  of  the
allowance.  The  allowance  is  based  on  DNB’s  past  loan  loss  experience,  known  and  inherent  risks  in  the
portfolio,  adverse  situations  that  may  affect  the  borrower’s  ability  to  repay,  the  estimated  value  of  any
underlying  collateral,  composition  of  the  loan  portfolio,  current  economic  conditions  and  other  relevant
factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant revision as more information  becomes available.

The  allowance  consists  of  specific,  general  and  unallocated  components.  The  specific  component
relates  to  loans  that  are  classified  as  impaired.  For  loans  that  are  classified  as  impaired,  an  allowance  is
established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired
loan  is  lower  than  the  carrying  value  of  that  loan.  The  general  component  covers  pools  of  loans  by  loan
class including commercial loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous loans,
such as residential real estate, home equity and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated
for  loss  exposure,  based  upon  historical  loss  rates  for  each  of  these  categories  of  loans,  adjusted  for
qualitative factors. These qualitative risk  factors include:

1. Lending  policies  and  procedures,  including  underwriting  standards  and  collection,  charge-off  and

recovery practices

2. National,  regional,  and  local  economic  and  business  conditions  as  well  as  the  condition  of  various

market segments, including the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans

3. Nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of  loans

4. Experience, ability, and depth of lending  management and staff

5. Volume and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans as well as other loan modifications

6. Quality of DNB’s loan review system, and the degree of oversight by DNB’s Board  of Directors

7. Existence  and  effect  of  any  concentrations  of  credit  and  changes  in  the  level  of  such  concentrations

8. Effect of external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements

9. Changes in the value of underlying  collateral  for collateral-dependent  loans

Each  factor  is  assigned  a  value  to  reflect  improving,  stable  or  declining  conditions  based  on
management’s  best  judgment  using  relevant  information  available  at  the  time  of  the  evaluation.

73

Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of changes in conditions in a narrative
accompanying the  allowance for credit  loss calculation.

Residential mortgage loans involve certain risks such as interest rate risk and risk of non-repayment.
Adjustable-rate  single  family  real  estate  loans  decreases  the  interest  rate  risk  to  the  Company  that  is
associated with changes in interest rates but involve other risks, primarily because as interest rates rise, the
payment  by  the  borrower  rises  to  the  extent  permitted  by  the  terms  of  the  loan,  thereby  increasing  the
potential  for  default.  At  the  same  time,  the  marketability  of  the  underlying  property  may  be  adversely
affected by higher interest rates. Repayment risk can be affected by job loss, divorce, illness and personal
bankruptcy or the borrower.

Commercial  real  estate  lending  entails  significant  additional  risks  as  compared  with  single-family
residential property lending. Such loans typically involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups
of  related  borrowers.  The  payment  experience  on  such  loans  is  typically  dependent  on  the  successful
operation  of  the  real  estate  project.  The  success  of  such  projects  is  sensitive  to  changes  in  supply  and
demand conditions in the market for  commercial real estate as well as economic conditions  generally.

Commercial  loans,  which  are  also  referred  to  as  commercial  and  industrial  loans  (‘‘C  &  I  loans’’),
include  advances  to  businesses  for  general  commercial  purposes  and  include  permanent  and  short-term
working  capital,  machinery  and  equipment  financing,  and  may  be  either  in  the  form  of  lines  of  credit  or
term loans. Although C & I loans may be unsecured to our highest rated borrowers, the majority of these
loans  are  secured  by  the  borrower’s  accounts  receivable,  inventory  and  machinery  and  equipment.  In  a
significant  number  of  these  loans,  the  collateral  also  includes  the  business  real  estate  or  the  business
owner’s  personal  real  estate  or  assets.  C  &  I  loans  present  credit  exposure  to  DNB,  as  they  are  more
susceptible to risk of loss during a downturn in the economy, as borrowers may have greater difficulty in
meeting  their  debt  service  requirements  and  the  value  of  the  collateral  may  decline.  DNB  attempts  to
mitigate  this  risk  through  its  underwriting  standards,  including  evaluating  the  credit  worthiness  of  the
borrower and to the extent available, credit ratings on the business. Additionally, monitoring of the loans
through annual renewals and meetings with the borrowers are typical. However, these procedures cannot
eliminate the risk of loss associated with  this  type of lending.

Construction  lending  is  generally  considered  to  involve  a  higher  level  of  risk  as  compared  to  single-
family residential lending, due to the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers
and the effects of general economic conditions on developers and builders. Moreover, a construction loan
can  involve  additional  risks  because  of  the  inherent  difficulty  in  estimating  both  a  property’s  value  at
completion  of  the  project  and  the  estimated  cost  (including  interest)  of  the  project.  The  nature  of  these
loans  is  such  that  they  are  generally  more  difficult  to  evaluate  and  monitor.  DNB  has  attempted  to
minimize the foregoing risks by, among other things, limiting the extent of its construction lending and has
adopted  underwriting  guidelines  which 
loan-to-value,  debt  service  and  other
impose  stringent 
requirements  for  loans  which  are  believed  to  involve  higher  elements  of  credit  risk,  by  limiting  the
geographic area in which DNB will do business and by working with builders with whom it has established
relationships.

Consumer  loans  generally  have  shorter  terms  and  higher  interest  rates  than  mortgage  loans  but
generally involve more credit risk than mortgage loans because of the type and nature of the collateral and,
in certain cases, the absence of collateral. In addition, consumer lending collections are dependent on the
borrower’s  continuing  financial  stability,  and  thus  are  more  likely  to  be  adversely  effected  by  job  loss,
divorce,  illness  and  personal  bankruptcy.  In  most  cases,  any  repossessed  collateral  for  a  defaulted
consumer loan will not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because
of improper repair and maintenance of the underlying security. The remaining deficiency often does not
warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. DNB believes that the generally higher
yields earned on consumer loans compensate for the increased credit risk associated with such loans and
that consumer loans are important to  its efforts to provide a full range  of services to its customers.

74

An  unallocated  component  is  maintained  to  cover  uncertainties  that  could  affect  management’s
estimate  of  probable  losses.  The  unallocated  component  of  the  allowance  reflects  the  margin  of
imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and
general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that DNB
will  be  unable  to  collect  the  scheduled  payments  of  principal  or  interest  when  due  according  to  the
contractual  terms  of  the  loan  agreement.  Factors  considered  by  management  in  determining  impairment
include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest
payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally
are  not  classified  as  impaired.  Management  determines  the  significance  of  payment  delays  and  payment
shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan
and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment
record  and  the  amount  of  the  shortfall  in  relation  to  the  principal  and  interest  owed.  Impairment  is
measured  on  a  loan  by  loan  basis  for  commercial  and  industrial  loans,  commercial  real  estate  loans  and
commercial construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loan’s  effective  interest  rate  or  the  fair  value  of  the  collateral  if  the  loan  is  collateral  dependent.  An
allowance for credit losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair
value.  The  estimated  fair  values  of  substantially  all  of  DNB’s  impaired  loans  are  measured  based  on  the
estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.

For commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through
third-party  appraisals.  When  a  real  estate  secured  loan  becomes  impaired,  a  decision  is  made  regarding
whether  an  updated  certified  appraisal  of  the  real  estate  is  necessary.  This  decision  is  based  on  various
considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original
appraisal  and  the  condition  of  the  property.  Appraised  values  are  discounted  to  arrive  at  the  estimated
selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include
estimated costs to sell the property.

For commercial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and
equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory
reports,  accounts  receivable  agings  or  equipment  appraisals  or  invoices.  Indications  of  value  from  these
sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets.

We  perform  separate  impairment  analyses  once  residential  or  consumer  loans  become  significantly
delinquent.  This  is  essentially  the  same  process  for  all  loan  types.  Once  on  non-accrual  or  at  90  days
delinquent  (if  not  before),  we  generally  get  updated  valuations  (appraisals,  etc.)  and  then  perform  the
impairment  analysis.  So,  the  general  reserve  is  used  to  cover  the  performing  loans  until  we  pull  out  the
problem accounts.

The  allowance  calculation  methodology  includes  further  segregation  of  loan  classes  into  risk  rating
categories.  The  borrower’s  overall  financial  condition,  repayment  sources,  guarantors  and  value  of
collateral,  if  appropriate,  are  evaluated  annually  for  commercial  loans  or  when  credit  deficiencies  arise,
such as delinquent loan payments, for commercial and consumer loans. Credit quality risk ratings include
regulatory  classifications  of  special  mention,  substandard,  doubtful  and  loss.  Loans  criticized  special
mention  have  potential  weaknesses  that  deserve  management’s  close  attention.  If  uncorrected,  the
potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard
have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans
that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the
collateral  pledged,  if  any.  Loans  classified  doubtful  have  all  the  weaknesses  inherent  in  loans  classified
substandard  with  the  added  characteristic  that  collection  or  liquidation  in  full,  on  the  basis  of  current
conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are
charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans  not  classified are rated  pass.

75

In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically
review  DNB’s  allowance  for  credit  losses  and  may  require  DNB  to  recognize  additions  to  the  allowance
based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may
not  be  currently  available  to  management.  Based  on  management’s  comprehensive  analysis  of  the  loan
portfolio, management believes the current  level of  the allowance for  credit losses is appropriate.

Troubled  Debt  Restructurings  Loans  whose  terms  are  modified  are  classified  as  troubled  debt
restructurings (‘‘TDR’’) if DNB grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers
are  experiencing  financial  difficulty.  Concessions  granted  under  a  troubled  debt  restructuring  generally
involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date. Non-accrual
troubled  debt  restructurings  are  restored  to  accrual  status  if  principal  and  interest  payments,  under  the
modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt
restructurings are designated as impaired. The recorded investments in troubled debt restructured loans at
December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

Pre-Modification

December 31, 2017
Post-Modification

Outstanding Recorded Outstanding  Recorded

Investment

Investment

Recorded Investment

$ 754
992

148
40

$1,934

$ 883
992

148
42

$2,065

$ 690
982

146
39

$1,857

Pre-Modification

December 31, 2016
Post-Modification

Outstanding Recorded Outstanding  Recorded

Investment

Investment

Recorded Investment

$754

148
40

$942

$ 883

148
42

$1,073

$726

148
40

$914

At  December  31,  2017,  DNB  had  eight  TDRs  with  recorded  investment  totaling  $1,857,000,  five  of
which,  totaling  $1,128,000,  were  accruing  loans  in  compliance  with  the  terms  of  the  modifications.  The
remaining $729,000 represents three loans that were nonaccrual impaired loans and resulted in collateral
evaluations.  As  a  result  of  the  evaluations,  specific  reserves  and  charge-offs  have  been  taken  where
appropriate.  As  of  December  31,  2017,  DNB  recognized  partial  charge-offs  totaling  $151,000  on  two
residential  loans  prior  to  their  restructuring  and  $2,000  on  one  consumer  installment  loan  after  its
restructuring.  As  of  December  31,  2017,  there  were  no  defaulted  TDRs  as  all  TDRs  were  current  with
respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs within twelve months
of  restructure  during  2017.  DNB  classified  three  commercial  mortgage  loans  totaling  $992,000  as  TDRs
during the year ended December 31, 2017.

At December 31, 2016, DNB had five TDRs with recorded investment totaling $914,000, one of which
totaled $102,000, represented an accruing impaired home equity loan in compliance with the terms of the
modification.  The  remaining  $812,000  represents  four  loans  that  were  nonaccrual  impaired  loans  and
resulted in collateral evaluations. As a result of the evaluations, specific reserves and charge-offs have been

76

taken where appropriate. As of December 31, 2016, DNB recognized partial charge-offs totaling $151,000
on two residential loans prior to their restructuring and $2,000 on one consumer installment loan after its
restructuring. DNB did not recognize any charge-off to the last remaining TDR. As of December 31, 2016,
there  were  no  defaulted  TDRs  as  all  TDRs  were  current  with  respect  to  their  associated  forbearance
agreements. There were no defaults on TDRs within twelve months of restructure during 2016. DNB did
not classify any loans as TDRs during the  year  ended December 31, 2016.

Reserve  for  unfunded  loan  commitments The  reserve  for  unfunded  loan  commitments  represents
management’s  estimate  of  losses  inherent  in  off-balance  sheet  items  related  to  the  loan  portfolio  which
consist of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The same risk and loss factors are applied to
both  funded  and  unfunded  commitments.  However,  the  bank  calculates  reserves  required  to  support
unfunded commitments in each loan category based only on the estimated likelihood (the probability) that
DNB would advance funds into a known troubled situation, and then sustain a loss on the newly advanced
funds. The amount of reserve for unfunded loan commitments, which is included in ‘‘Other liabilities’’ on
the statement of financial condition, was $348,000 and $345,000 at December 31, 2017 and December 31,
2016, respectively.

Other Real Estate Owned & Other Repossessed Property Other real estate owned (‘‘OREO’’) and other
repossessed property consists of properties acquired as a result of, or in-lieu-of, foreclosure as well as other
repossessed property. Properties classified as OREO are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at
the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically
performed  by  management  and  the  assets  are  carried  at  the  lower  of  carrying  value  or  fair  value,  less
estimated costs to sell. Costs relating to the development or improvement of the properties are capitalized
and costs relating to holding the properties are charged to expense. DNB had $416,000 and $3.1 million of
commercial mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
respectively.

Office Properties and Equipment Office properties and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is
computed  using  the  straight-line  method  over  the  expected  useful  lives  of  the  assets.  The  costs  of
maintenance and repairs are expensed as they are incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. All
long-lived  assets  are  reviewed  for  impairment  when  conditions  indicate  that  impairment  may  have
occurred, based on the fair value of the asset. In addition, long-lived assets to be disposed of are generally
reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. Gains or losses on disposition of
properties and equipment are reflected  in operations.

Goodwill  and  Intangible  Assets DNB  accounts  for  goodwill  and  intangible  assets  in  accordance  with
ASC 350, ‘‘Intangibles — Goodwill and Other.’’ Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair
value  of  the  net  assets  acquired  in  connection  with  the  2016  acquisition  of  East  River  Bank.  If  certain
events  occur,  which  indicate  goodwill  might  be  impaired  between  annual  tests,  goodwill  must  be  tested
when  such  events  occur.  In  making  this  assessment,  DNB  considers  a  number  of  factors  including
operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, current market data,
stock price, etc. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in
applying  them  to  the  analysis  of  goodwill  impairment.  Changes  in  economic  and  operating  conditions
could result in goodwill impairment in future periods. DNB did not identify any impairment during 2017.
The annual test date is October 1st. DNB has conducted a qualitative test (step zero) as of October 1, 2017
and determined that its Goodwill has not been impaired.

Income Taxes DNB accounts for income taxes in accordance with the income tax accounting guidance

set forth in FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes.

The  income  tax  accounting  guidance  results  in  two  components  of  income  tax  expense:  current  and
deferred.  Current  income  tax  expense  reflects  taxes  to  be  paid  or  refunded  for  the  current  period  by
applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues.

77

DNB determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method,
the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax
bases  of  assets  and  liabilities,  and  enacted  changes  in  tax  rates  and  laws  are  recognized  in  the  period  in
which  they occur.

DNB recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense. DNB
is no longer subject to examinations by taxing authorities for the years before January 1, 2014. DNB had no
unrecognized tax positions as of December 31, 2017.

Pension  Plan The  Bank  maintains  a  noncontributory  defined  benefit  pension  plan  covering
substantially all employees over the age of 21 with one year of service. Plan benefits are based on years of
service  and  the  employee’s  monthly  average  compensation  for  the  highest  five  consecutive  years  of  their
last  ten  years  of  service  (see  Note  14  —  Benefit  Plans).  The  Bank  recognizes  the  overfunded  or
underfunded  status  of  pension  and  other  post  retirement  benefit  plans  on  the  balance  sheet.  Gains  and
losses,  prior  service  costs  and  credits,  and  any  remaining  transition  amounts  that  have  not  yet  been
recognized  through  net  periodic  benefit  cost  will  be  recognized  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive
income, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of  net  periodic cost.

Stock  Based  Compensation Stock  compensation  accounting  guidance  (FASB  ASC  Topic  718,
Compensation  —  Stock  Compensation)  requires  that  the  compensation  cost  relating  to  share-based
payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant
date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The stock compensation accounting guidance
covers  a  wide  range  of  share-based  compensation  arrangements  including  stock  options,  restricted  share
plans, performance-based awards, share  appreciation rights, and employee  share purchase plans.

The stock compensation accounting guidance requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be
calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For
awards  with  graded-vesting,  compensation  cost  is  recognized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  requisite
service  period  for  the  entire  award.  A  Black  Sholes  model  is  used  to  estimate  the  fair  value  of  stock
options. The market price of DNB’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.

Earnings Per Common Share (EPS) Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur
from  unvested  stock  awards  and  the  exercise  of  stock  options  and  warrants  computed  using  the  treasury
stock method. Stock options and awards for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over
the  period  have  an  anti-dilutive  effect  on  EPS  and,  accordingly,  are  excluded  from  the  EPS  calculation.
Treasury shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.

Comprehensive  Income Comprehensive  income  consists  of  net  income  and  other  comprehensive
income  (loss).  Other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  includes  unrealized  gains  and  losses  on  securities
to
available  for  sale,  accretion  of  discount  on  securities 

transferred  from  available-for-sale 

78

held-to-maturity, and changes in the funded status of the pension plan of which the accumulated amounts
are also recognized as separate components of stockholders’ equity.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2017
Net unrealized loss on AFS securities
Unrealized actuarial losses-pension

December 31, 2016
Net unrealized loss on AFS securities
Discount  on AFS to HTM reclassification
Unrealized actuarial losses-pension

Before-Tax
Amount

Tax
Effect

Net-of-Tax
Amount

$(1,772)
(1,849)

$ 603
628

$(1,169)
(1,221)

$(3,621)

$1,231

$(2,390)

$(1,646)
(8)
(1,792)

$ 560
3
609

$(1,086)
(5)
(1,183)

$(3,446)

$1,172

$(2,274)

Treasury Stock Shares of the Company’s common stock which are repurchased on the open market are
classified  as  treasury  stock  on  the  consolidated  balance  sheet.  Treasury  stock  is  recorded  at  the  cost  at
which it was obtained in the open market, and at the date of reissuance, treasury stock on the consolidated
balance  sheet  is  reduced  by  the  cost  for  which  it  was  purchased,  using  a  weighted  average  price  of  the
remaining treasury stock.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance The Bank is the beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives of certain
officers  of  the  Bank.  The  Bank  has  recognized  the  amount  that  could  be  realized  under  the  insurance
policies as an asset in the consolidated  statements of financial condition.

Trust Assets Assets held by DNB First Wealth Management, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, in
fiduciary or agency capacities are not included in the consolidated financial statements since such items are
not assets of DNB. Operating income and expenses of DNB First Wealth Management are included in the
consolidated statements of income and  are  recorded on an accrual basis.

Advertising  and  Marketing  Costs DNB  follows  the  policy  of  charging  the  costs  of  advertising  and
marketing  to  expense  as  incurred.  Advertising  and  marketing  costs  were  approximately  $755,000  and
$707,000 for the years ended December  31, 2017 and  December  31, 2016, respectively.

Significant  Concentrations  of  Credit  Risk Most  of  DNB’s  activities  are  with  customers  located
throughout  southeastern  Pennsylvania.  DNB’s  commercial  portfolio  has  a  concentration  in  loans  to
commercial  real  estate  investors  and  developers  as  defined  by  regulation.  There  are  numerous  risks
associated with commercial loans that could impact the borrower’s ability to repay on a timely basis. They
include, but are not limited to: the owner’s business expertise; changes in local, national, and in some cases
international  economies;  competition;  governmental  regulation;  and  the  general  financial  stability  of  the
borrowing entity.

DNB  attempts  to  mitigate  these  risks  by  completing  an  analysis  of  the  borrower’s  business  and
industry  history,  the  borrower’s  financial  position,  as  well  as  that  of  the  business  owner.  DNB  will  also
require  the  borrower  to  periodically  provide  financial  information  on  the  operation  of  the  business  over
the life of the loan. In addition, most commercial loans are secured by assets of the business or those of the
business  owner,  which  can  be  liquidated  if  the  borrower  defaults,  along  with  the  personal  surety  of  the
business owner.

Subsequent  Events Management  has  evaluated  events  and  transactions  occurring  subsequent  to
December  31,  2017  for  items  that  should  potentially  be  recognized  or  disclosed  in  these  Consolidated
Financial  Statements.  The  evaluation  was  conducted  through  the  date  these  financial  statements  were
issued.

79

(2) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Mergers and  Acquisition

On April 4, 2016, DNB Financial Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’ or ‘‘DNBF’’), the parent company of
DNB  First,  N.A.  (‘‘DNB  First’’),  entered  into  an  Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger  (the  ‘‘Merger
Agreement’’)  with  East  River  Bank  (‘‘ERB’’).  Under  the  transaction,  ERB  merged  with  and  into  DNB
First. The merger was consummated on October 1, 2016. The acquisition was an opportunity for DNB to
strengthen its competitive position as one of the premier community banks headquartered in Southeastern
Pennsylvania. Additionally, the ERB acquisition enhanced DNB’s footprint in Southeastern Pennsylvania.
The goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of the synergies and economies of scale expected
from combining the operations DNB  and  ERB.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of ERB common stock was converted into
the  right  to  receive,  at  the  election  of  the  ERB  shareholder  (subject  to  certain  conditions,  including
conditions  relating  to  pro-ration):  (i)  0.6562  shares  of  DNB  common  stock  or  (ii)  $18.65  in  cash.  The
Merger Agreement provided that election of shares of DNB stock or cash was subject to pro-ration such
that  2,085,662  ERB  shares  of  common  stock,  or  approximately  85.3%  of  the  current  outstanding  ERB
shares, would be exchanged for DNB common stock with the remaining ERB shares to be exchanged for
cash and that the aggregate cash consideration payable to ERB shareholders was $6.7 million. The Merger
Agreement  also  provided  that  options  to  purchase  ERB  common  stock  outstanding  be  exchanged  for  a
cash  payment  equal  to  the  difference  between  the  per  share  cash  consideration  under  the  Merger
Agreement  and  the  corresponding  exercise  price  of  such  option.  Options  to  acquire  an  aggregate  of
248,000  shares  of  ERB  common  stock  were  exchanged  for  a  cash  payment  of  $1.9  million.  Additionally,
$2,399 of cash was paid in lieu of fractional  shares.

The acquisition of ERB was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of
accounting,  which  includes  estimating  the  fair  value  of  assets  acquired,  liabilities  assumed  and
consideration  paid  as  of  the  acquisition  date.  The  assets  and  liabilities  of  ERB  were  recorded  on  the
consolidated  statement  of  financial  condition  at  their  estimated  fair  values  as  of  October  1,  2016,  and
ERB’s results of operations have been  included in  the consolidated income statement since that date.

Included  in  the  purchase  price  was  goodwill  and  a  core  deposit  intangible  of  $15,590,000  and
$508,000, respectively. The core deposit intangible will be amortized over a ten-year period using a sum of
the year’s digits basis. The goodwill is not taxable and will not be amortized, but will be measured annually
for impairment or more frequently if circumstances require. Core deposit intangible amortization expense
projected  for  the  next  five  years  beginning  in  2017  is  estimated  to  be  $90,000,  $81,000,  $72,000,  $62,000,
and  $53,000  per  year,  respectively,  and  $127,000  in  total  for  years  after  2021.  DNB  does  not  expect  any
further adjustments to the purchase price as  it was finalized as of December 31,  2016.

80

The allocation of the purchase price is as  follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets  acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents
AFS investment securities
Loans
Goodwill
Core deposit and other intangible
Other assets

Total assets acquired

Liabilities assumed:
Deposits
FHLBP borrowings
Other liabilities

Total liabilities assumed

Consideration transferred

Cash paid
Fair value of common stock issued (1,368,527 shares —  fair value per share of  $25.36)

$

3,116
3,027
306,396
15,590
508
10,838

$339,475

$227,153
68,436
576

$296,165

$ 43,310

$

8,604
34,706

The  following  table  summarizes  the  estimated  fair  value  of  the  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  and

equity assumed.

(Dollars in thousands)

Total purchase price
Net assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents
AFS investment securities
Restricted stock
Loans
Premises and equipment
Deferred income taxes
Accrued interest receivable
Core deposit and other intangibles
Other assets
Deposits
FHLBP borrowings
Accrued interest payable
Other liabilities

Net assets acquired

Goodwill

$ 43,310

$

3,116
3,027
2,933
306,396
204
1,713
1,098
508
4,890
(227,153)
(68,436)
(129)
(447)

$ 27,720

$ 15,590

The  fair  value  of  the  financial  assets  acquired  included  loans  receivable  with  a  gross  amortized  cost
basis  of  $312,279,000.  The  table  below  illustrates  the  fair  value  adjustments  made  to  the  amortized  cost
basis  in  order  to  present  a  fair  value  of  the  loans  acquired.  The  credit  adjustment  on  impaired  loans  is

81

derived  in  accordance  with  ASC  310-30  and  represents  the  portion  of  the  loan  balances  that  has  been
deemed uncollectible based on the Company’s expectations of future cash flows for each respective loan.

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross amortized cost basis at October  1, 2016
Interest rate fair value adjustment on  pools of homogeneous loan
Credit  fair value adjustment on pools of  homogeneous loans
Credit  fair value adjustment on impaired loans

Fair value of purchased loans at October  1,  2016

$312,279
(200)
(4,846)
(837)

$306,396

For  loans  acquired  without  evidence  of  credit  quality  deterioration,  DNB  prepared  the  interest  rate
loan  fair  value  and  credit  fair  value  adjustments.  Loans  were  grouped  into  homogenous  pools  by
characteristics  such  as  loan  type,  term,  collateral  and  rate.  Market  rates  for  similar  loans  were  obtained
from  various  internal  and  external  data  sources  and  reviewed  by  management  for  reasonableness.  The
average of these rates was used as the fair value interest rate a market participant would utilize. A present
value approach was utilized to calculate  the interest rate fair value discount of $200,000.

Additionally  for  loans  acquired  without  credit  deterioration,  a  credit  fair  value  adjustment  was
calculated  using  a  two  part  credit  fair  value  analysis:  1)  expected  lifetime  credit  migration  losses;  and
2)  estimated  fair  value  adjustment  for  certain  qualitative  factors.  The  expected  lifetime  losses  were
calculated  using  historical  losses  observed  at  the  Bank,  ERB  and  peer  banks.  DNB  also  estimated  an
environmental  factor  to  apply  to  each  loan  type.  The  environmental  factor  represents  potential  discount
which may arise due to general credit and economic factors. A credit fair value discount of $4.8 million was
determined. Both the interest rate and credit fair value adjustments relate to loans acquired with evidence
of  credit  quality  deterioration  will  be  substantially  recognized  as  interest  income  on  a  level  yield
amortization method based upon the expected life  of the loans.

The  information  about  the  acquired  ERB  loans  accounted  for  under  ASC  310-30  as  of  October  1,

2016 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Contractually required principal and interest  at acquisition
Contractual cash flows not expected to  be  collected (nonaccretable discount)

Expected cash flows at acquisition
Interest component of expected cash flows  (accretable  discount)

Fair value of acquired loans

$ 3,142
(1,124)

$ 2,018
(348)

$ 1,670

The following table presents pro forma information as if the merger between the company and ERB
had been completed on January 1, 2015. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results
of  operations  that  would  have  occurred  had  DNB  merged  with  ERB  at  the  beginning  of  2015.
Supplemental pro forma earnings for 2016 were adjusted to exclude $4.7 million of merger related costs
incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016. The pro forma financial information does not include the
impact of possible business model changes,  nor does  it  consider any potential impacts of current market

82

conditions  or  revenues,  expense  efficiencies,  or  other  factors.  The  pro  forma  data  is  intended  for
informational purposes and is not indicative of the future results of operations.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Net interest income after provision for  credit  losses
Non-interest income
Non-interest expense
Net income available to common stockholders
Net income per common share — basic
Net income per common share — diluted

(Unaudited)
Years Ended
December 31,
2015
2016

$34,056
6,777
29,245
8,537
2.01
1.98

$32,281
5,565
27,169
7,737
1.88
1.84

The amount of total revenue, consisting of interest income plus noninterest income specifically related
to  ERB  for  the  period  beginning  October  1,  2016,  included  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income  of
DNB for the year ended 2016 is incalculable due to the fact that East River Bank and its operations are no
longer accounted for on a stand-alone basis.

(3)

INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The  amortized  cost  and  estimated  fair  values  of  investment  securities,  as  of  the  dates  indicated,  are

summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Held To Maturity
US Government agency obligations
Government Sponsored Entities (GSE)  mortgage-

backed securities

Corporate bonds
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
State and municipal taxable
State and municipal tax-exempt

December 31, 2017
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Fair  Value

Losses

Gains

Cost

$

8,483

$163

$ —

$

8,646

496
14,047
1,471
363
37,530

9
243
—
—
59

—
(2)
(29)
(8)
(405)

505
14,288
1,442
355
37,184

Total

$ 62,390

$474

$ (444)

$ 62,420

Available  For Sale
US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total

$ 53,279
33,203
12,101
12,981
1,991

$113,555

$ —
—
—
12
—

$ 12

$ (386)
(715)
(447)
(173)
(63)

$ 52,893
32,488
11,654
12,820
1,928

$(1,784)

$111,783

83

(Dollars in thousands)

Held To Maturity
US Government agency obligations
Government Sponsored Entities (GSE)  mortgage-

backed securities

Corporate bonds
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
State and municipal taxable
State and municipal tax-exempt

December 31, 2016
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Fair  Value

Losses

Gains

Cost

$

8,224

$309

$ —

$

8,533

1,440
12,825
1,966
1,008
41,559

38
230
2
6
8

—
(63)
(22)
—
(1,406)

1,478
12,992
1,946
1,014
40,161

Total

$ 67,022

$593

$(1,491)

$ 66,124

Available  For Sale
US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt
Asset-backed security

Total

$ 52,428
30,861
12,957
15,474
5,084
26

$116,830

$ 31
2
3
5
—
—

$ 41

$ (150)
(723)
(387)
(299)
(128)
—

$ 52,309
30,140
12,573
15,180
4,956
26

$(1,687)

$115,184

Included in unrealized losses are market losses on securities that have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position for twelve months or more and those securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for less than twelve months. The table below details the aggregate unrealized losses and aggregate
fair  value  of  the  underlying  securities  whose  fair  values  are  below  their  amortized  cost  at  December  31,
2017 and 2016.

December 31,  2017

(Dollars in thousands)

Held To Maturity
Corporate bonds
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
State and municipal taxable
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total

Available For Sale
US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total

Total

Fair  value Unrealized Fair value Unrealized
Impaired

Loss
Unrealized Less  Than Less Than More  Than More Than
12 Months 12 Months 12  Months 12 Months

Impaired

Loss

Loss

Total
Fair  Value

$

498
1,442
355
20,240

$

(2)
(29)
(8)
(405)

$

498
620
355
6,775

$

(2)
(5)
(8)
(67)

$ 22,535

$ (444)

$ 8,248

$ (82)

$ 52,893
32,488
11,654
10,759
1,928

$ (386)
(715)
(447)
(173)
(63)

$30,894
9,055
2,132
4,572
288

$109,722

$(1,784)

$46,941

$(185)
(133)
(56)
(43)
(2)

$(419)

$ —
822
—
13,465

$14,287

$21,999
23,433
9,522
6,187
1,640

$62,781

$ —
(24)
—
(338)

$ (362)

$ (201)
(582)
(391)
(130)
(61)

$(1,365)

84

(Dollars in thousands)

Held To Maturity
Corporate bonds
Collateralized mortgage

obligations GSE

State and municipal tax-exempt

December 31,  2016

Total
Fair Value

Total
Unrealized
Loss

Fair value
Impaired
Less Than
12  Months

Unrealized
Loss

Fair value
Impaired
Less Than More Than More  Than
12 Months
12  Months
12  Months

Unrealized
Loss

$ 5,962

$

(63)

$ 3,992

$

(39)

$ 1,970

$ (24)

1,104
32,690

(22)
(1,406)

1,104
32,690

(22)
(1,406)

—
—

—
—

Total

$39,756

$(1,491)

$37,786

$(1,467)

$ 1,970

$ (24)

Available For Sale
US Government  agency

obligations

GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage

obligations GSE

Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt
Asset-backed security

$27,270
29,145

$ (150)
(723)

$27,270
29,145

$ (150)
(723)

$ —
—

12,116
13,031
4,956
26

(387)
(299)
(128)
—

4,868
7,593
4,956
26

(94)
(218)
(128)
—

7,248
5,438
—
—

$ —
—

(293)
(81)
—
—

Total

$86,544

$(1,687)

$73,858

$(1,313)

$12,686

$(374)

As  of  December  31,  2017,  there  were  nineteen  GSE  mortgage-backed  securities,  thirty-seven
municipalities,  eight  corporate  bonds,  eleven  agency  notes,  and  nineteen  collateralized  mortgage
obligations  which  were  in  an  unrealized  loss  position.  DNB  does  not  intend  to  sell  these  securities  and
management does not expect to be required to sell any of these securities prior to a recovery of their cost
basis. Management has reviewed all of these securities and believes that DNB will collect all principal and
interest  that  is  due  on  debt  securities  on  a  timely  basis.  Management  does  not  believe  any  individual
unrealized loss as of December 31, 2017 represents an other-than-temporary impairment. DNB reviews its
investment portfolio on a quarterly basis judging each investment for OTTI. The OTTI analysis focuses on
the duration and the amount a particular security  is below book value.

Factors affecting the market price include credit risk, market risk, interest rates, economic cycles, and
liquidity risk. The magnitude of any unrealized loss may be affected by the relative concentration of DNB’s
investment  in  any  one  issuer  or  industry.  DNB  has  established  policies  to  reduce  exposure  through
diversification of concentration of the investment portfolio including limits on concentrations to any one
issuer and as such, management believes  the investment portfolio is  prudently diversified.

The  declines  in  value  are  related  to  a  change  in  interest  rates  and/or  subsequent  change  in  credit
spreads  required  for  these  issues  affecting  market  price.  All  issues  are  performing  and  are  expected  to
continue  to  perform  in  accordance  with  their  respective  contractual  terms  and  conditions.  Short  to
intermediate  average  durations  and  in  certain  cases  monthly  principal  payments  should  reduce  further
market value  exposure to increases in rates.

Collateralized  mortgage  obligations  GSE There  are  nineteen  impaired  securities  classified  as
collateralized mortgage obligations, sixteen of which were impaired for more than 12 months. The largest
unrealized loss of a security in this group is 5.52% of its carrying value. All of these securities were issued
and insured by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. DNB receives monthly principal and interest payments on all
of  these  securities  on  a  timely  basis  and  none  of  these  agencies  has  ever  defaulted  on  mortgage-backed
principal  or  interest.  DNB  anticipates  a  recovery  in  the  market  value  as  the  securities  approach  their
maturity  dates  or  if  interest  rates  decline  from  December  31,  2017  levels.  Management  concluded  that
these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017.

85

State and municipal tax-exempt There are thirty-seven impaired securities in this category, which are
comprised  of  intermediate  to  long-term  municipal  bonds,  twenty  of  which  were  impaired  for  more  than
12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 4.08% of its carrying value. All of the
issues  carry  a  ‘‘BBB(cid:5)’’  or  better  underlying  credit  support  and  were  evaluated  on  the  basis  on  their
underlying  fundamentals;  included  but  not  limited  to  annual  financial  reports,  geographic  location,
population, and debt ratios. In certain cases, options for calls reduce the effective duration and in turn the
future  market  value  fluctuations.  All  issues  are  performing  and  are  expected  to  continue  to  perform  in
accordance with their respective contractual terms and conditions. There have not been disruptions of any
payments,  associated  with  any  of  these  municipal  securities.  These  bonds  are  conservative  in  nature  and
the value decline is related to the changes in interest rates that occurred since the time of purchase and
subsequent  changes  in  spreads  affecting  the  market  prices.  Twenty-two  of  the  impaired  municipals  are
school  districts  that  have  PA  school  district  credit  enhancement  programs  and  eleven  of  those  also  have
additional insurance. The remaining fifteen are one insured school district, two uninsured school districts,
five  insured  townships  and  seven  uninsured  townships,  all  of  which  have  strong  underlying  ratings.
Management  concluded  that  these  securities  were  not  other-than-temporarily  impaired  at  December  31,
2017.

US Government agency obligations There are eleven impaired securities classified as agencies, three
of which were impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is
1.56% of its carrying value. All of these securities were issued and insured by FHLB, FNMA, or FHLMC.
DNB has received timely interest payments on all of these securities and none of these agencies has ever
defaulted on their bonds. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities approach their
maturity dates. Management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at
December 31, 2017.

GSE  mortgage-backed  securities There  are  nineteen  impaired  bonds  classified  as  GSE  mortgage-
backed securities, fourteen of which were impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of
a  security  in  this  group  is  3.12%  of  its  carrying  value.  All  of  these  securities  were  issued  and  insured  by
FNMA,  FHLMC  or  GNMA.  DNB  receives  monthly  principal  and  interest  payments  on  all  of  these
securities on a timely basis and none of these agencies has ever defaulted on mortgage-backed principal or
interest. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities approach their maturity dates or
if interest rates decline from December 31, 2017 levels. Management concluded that these securities were
not other-than-temporarily impaired  at  December 31, 2017.

Corporate bonds There were eight impaired bonds classified as corporate bonds, four of which were
impaired for more than 12 months. The largest unrealized loss of a security in this group is 3.64% of its
carrying value. The bonds are investment grade and the value decline is related to the changes in interest
rates  that  occurred  since  the  time  of  purchase  and  subsequent  changes  in  spreads  affecting  the  market
prices. All of the issues carry a ‘‘BBB+’’ or better underlying credit rating and were evaluated on the basis
on  their  underlying  fundamentals;  included  but  not  limited  to  annual  financial  reports,  rating  agency
reports, capital strength and debt ratios. DNB anticipates a recovery in the market value as the securities
approach  their  maturity  dates  or  if  interest  rates  decline  from  December  31,  2017  levels.  Management
concluded that these securities were  not other-than-temporarily impaired  at December 31,  2017.

In determining that the securities giving rise to the previously mentioned unrealized losses were not
other than temporary, the Corporation evaluated the factors cited above, which the Corporation considers
when  assessing  whether  a  security  is  other-than-temporarily  impaired.  In  making  these  evaluations  the
Corporation must exercise considerable judgment. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the actual
results  will  not  differ  from  the  Corporation’s  judgments  and  that  such  differences  may  not  require  the
future  recognition  of  other-than-temporary  impairment  charges  that  could  have  a  material  affect  on  the
Corporation’s financial position and results of operations. In addition, the value of, and the realization of
any loss on, an investment security is subject to numerous  risks as cited  above.

86

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities as of December 31, 2017, by final
contractual  maturity,  are  shown  below.  Actual  maturities  may  differ  from  contractual  maturities  because
certain securities may be called or prepaid without penalties.

Held to Maturity

Available for Sale

(Dollars in thousands)

Due in one year or less
Due after one year through five years
Due after five years through ten years
Due after ten years

Total investment securities

Amortized Estimated Amortized Estimated
Fair  Value

Fair Value

Cost

Cost

$ — $ — $ 17,220
43,853
22,813
22,519
14,612
27,910
27,915
37,870
11,697
11,956

$ 17,139
43,476
14,390
36,778

$62,390

$62,420

$113,555

$111,783

The  principal  values  of  investment  securities  sold  as  of  the  dates  indicated  are  shown  below.  The
HTM securities sold during 2017 and 2016 were sold in accordance with GAAP, as DNB collected greater
than  85%  of  the  original  recorded  investment  on  the  HTM  securities  prior  to  the  sale.  As  a  result,  it  is
appropriate to continue to carry the  remaining  HTM  portfolio as currently  classified.

(Dollars in thousands)

Available for sale securities sold
Held to maturity securities sold

Total sold securities

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$3,030
737

$43,913
761

$3,767

$44,674

Gains and losses resulting from investment sales, redemptions or  calls were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross realized gains-AFS
Gross realized gains-HTM
Gross realized losses-AFS

Net realized gain

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$10
41
(1)

$50

$440
21
(30)

$431

At  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  investment  securities  with  a  carrying  value  of  approximately
$105.9  million  and  $116.7  million,  respectively,  were  pledged  to  secure  public  funds,  repurchase
agreements, FHLBP advances, and for other purposes as required by law. See Note 8 regarding the use of
certain securities as collateral.

87

(4) LOANS

The major classifications of loans outstanding, net of fair value marks and deferred loan origination

fees and costs are summarized as follows.

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total loans
Less allowance for credit losses

Net loans

December 31

2017

2016

$ 93,959
484,868

$ 87,581
465,486

129,535
75,014

123,175
72,755

56,844
5,677

62,560
5,972

$845,897
(5,843)

$817,529
(5,373)

$840,054

$812,156

Some of DNB’s directors and executive officers, and their related interests had transactions with the
Bank in the ordinary course of business. It is anticipated that similar transactions will occur in the future.

(Dollars in thousands)

Related party loans at beginning of period
Advances
Purchases of related party loans from acquisition
Repayments

Related party loans at end of period

2017

2016

$ 67
$ 508
14
296
— 446
(19)

(411)

$ 393

$508

88

(5) ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The  performance  and  credit  quality  of  the  loan  portfolio  is  monitored  by  analyzing  the  age  of  the
loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables
present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of December 31, 2017 and
December 31, 2016:

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans Receivables

December 31, 2017

(Dollars in thousands)

Due

Due

Days

30-59

Greater Total
Days Past Days Past than 90 Past

60-89

Loans
Receivable
> 90
Days and
Due Current Receivables Accruing

Total
Loans

Residential mortgage (less
acquired with credit
deterioration)
Acquired residential

mortgage with credit
deterioration

Commercial mortgage (less

acquired with credit
deterioration)

Acquired commercial

mortgage with credit
deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

$ 887

$349

$1,148 $2,384 $ 91,568

$ 93,952

$—

—

221

—

381
514

15
13

—

—

—

13
—

7

7

—

7

1,126

1,347

483,105

484,452

416

416

—

416

1,654
—

2,048
514

127,487
74,500

129,535
75,014

—
139

386
156

401
308

56,443
5,369

56,844
5,677

—

—

—

—
—

—
54

$2,031

$501

$4,893 $7,425 $838,472

$845,897

$54

89

December 31, 2016

30-59

60-89
Days Past Days Past than 90
Due

Greater Total
Past
Due

Days

Due

Loans
Receivable
> 90
Total
Days and
Loans
Current Receivables Accruing

$ 728

$ 374

$ 491 $ 1,593 $ 85,977

$ 87,570

$—

—

—

11

11

—

11

1,202

762

2,169

4,133

459,679

463,812

389

747
112

263
27

83

377
—

—
65

673

1,145

529

1,674

23
1,242

1,147
1,354

122,028
71,401

123,175
72,755

300
151

563
243

61,997
5,729

62,560
5,972

—

—

—

—
—

—
—

$3,468

$1,661

$5,060 $10,189 $807,340

$817,529

$—

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage (less
acquired with credit
deterioration)
Acquired residential

mortgage with credit
deterioration

Commercial mortgage (less

acquired with credit
deterioration)

Acquired commercial

mortgage with credit
deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

DNB  had  $638,000  in  residential  mortgage  loans  in  the  process  of  foreclosure  and  $149,000  in
residential  mortgage  loans  in  other  real  estate  owned  as  of  December  31,  2017.  DNB  had  no  residential
mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure and $170,000 in residential mortgage loans in other real estate
owned as of December 31, 2016.

90

The following table sets forth those assets that are: (i) placed on non-accrual status, (ii) contractually
delinquent  by  90  days  or  more  and  still  accruing,  and  (iii)  OREO  as  a  result  of  foreclosure  or  voluntary
transfer to DNB as well as other repossessed  assets.

Interest  that  would  have  been  recognized  on  nonaccrual  loans  had  they  been  current  in  accordance
with  their  original  terms  was  $589,000  and  $590,000  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017  and
December 31, 2016, respectively.

Non-Performing Assets

(Dollars in thousands)

Non-accrual loans:

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total non-accrual loans
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing

Total non-performing loans
Other real estate owned & other repossessed property

Total non-performing assets

December 31
2016
2017

$ 1,915
2,259

$ 1,770
4,593

2,100
514

466
245

7,499
54

7,553
5,012

198
1,242

442
256

8,501
—

8,501
2,767

$12,565

$11,268

91

The following tables summarize information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of

December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for the years then  ended.

Impaired Loans

(Dollars in thousands)

With no related allowance recorded:

Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

With allowance recorded:
Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

Total:

Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

December 31, 2017

Recorded
Investment

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

Related
Allowance

Average
Recorded
Investment Recognized

Interest
Income

$1,908

$ 2,210

$ —

$1,540

$—

—
2,809

936

1,743
514

612
117

—
3,207

950

2,253
514

632
117

—
—

—

—
—

—
—

7
2,180

1,205

1,131
690

586
106

$8,639

$ 9,883

$ —

$7,445

$ —

$ —

$ —

$ 333

7
19

—

337
—

—
128

$ 491

$

26
93

—

343
—

—
129

591

3
19

—

123
—

—
12

4
8

—

325
89

—
169

$157

$ 928

$1,908

$ 2,210

$ —

$1,873

7
2,828

936

2,080
514

612
245

26
3,300

950

2,596
514

632
246

3
19

—

123
—

—
12

11
2,188

1,205

1,456
779

586
275

—
15

—

—
—

9
—

$24

$—

—
—

—

—
—

—
—

$—

$—

—
15

—

—
—

9
—

$9,130

$10,474

$157

$8,373

$24

92

(Dollars in thousands)

With no related allowance recorded:

Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

With allowance recorded:
Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

Total:

Residential mortgage
Acquired residential mortgage with

credit deterioration
Commercial mortgage
Acquired commercial mortgage

with credit deterioration

Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

December 31, 2016

Recorded
Investment

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

Related
Allowance

Average
Recorded
Investment Recognized

Interest
Income

$ 653

$

680

$ —

$1,134

$—

11
2,919

1,674

22
795

544
114

11
3,330

1,680

24
795

595
122

—
—

—

—
—

—
—

2
2,265

335

19
914

634
104

$6,732

$ 7,237

$ —

$5,407

$1,107

$ 1,368

$143

$ 605

—
—

—

176
447

—
142

—
—

—

196
2,833

—
142

—
—

—

97
89

—
5

—
—

—

185
358

—
114

$1,872

$ 4,539

$334

$1,262

$1,760

$ 2,048

$143

$1,739

11
2,919

1,674

198
1,242

544
256

11
3,330

1,680

220
3,628

595
264

—
—

—

97
89

—
5

2
2,265

335

204
1,272

634
218

—
—

—

—
—

4
—

$ 4

$—

—
—

—

—
—

—
—

$—

$—

—
—

—

—
—

4
—

$8,604

$11,776

$334

$6,669

$ 4

93

The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating
and  the  classified  ratings  of  special  mention,  substandard  and  doubtful  within  DNB’s  internal  risk  rating
system as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Credit Quality Indicators

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

(Dollars in thousands)

Residential mortgage
Commercial mortgage
Commercial:

Commercial term
Commercial construction

Consumer:

Home equity
Other

Total

December 31, 2017

Pass

Special
Mention

Substandard Doubtful

Total

$ 91,993
479,308

$ —
125

$ 1,966
5,435

125,926
73,902

56,085
5,432

115
—

—
—

3,494
1,112

759
245

$—
—

—
—

—
—

$ 93,959
484,868

129,535
75,014

56,844
5,677

$832,646

$ 240

$13,011

$—

$845,897

December 31, 2016

Pass

Special
Mention

Substandard Doubtful

Total

$ 85,259
450,124

$ —
3,763

$ 2,322
11,599

116,522
71,400

61,782
5,716

591
—

—
—

6,062
1,355

778
256

$—
—

—
—

—
—

$ 87,581
465,486

123,175
72,755

62,560
5,972

$790,803

$4,354

$22,372

$—

$817,529

94

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Related Loans

The following tables set forth the activity and composition of DNB’s allowance for credit losses at the

dates and periods indicated.

2017

Residential Commercial Commercial Commercial
Mortgage Mortgage

Lease
Construction Financing Home Equity

Consumer

Term

Consumer
Other

Unallocated

Total

Residential Commercial Commercial Commercial
Mortgage Mortgage

Lease
Construction Financing Home  Equity

Consumer

Term

Consumer
Other

Unallocated

Total

$

196
—
—
(13)

$

183

$ —

$

183

$

$

$

$

61
(38)
2
38

63

12

51

$56,844

$5,677

$

612

$ 245

$ —

$ —

$56,232

$5,432

$558
—
—
(11)

$547

$ —

$547

$

$

$

$

5,373
(1,325)
135
1,660

5,843

157

5,686

$845,897

$

$

8,187

943

$836,767

$—
—
1
(1)

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

2016

$—
—
3
(3)

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

$—

$

195
—
—
1

$

196

$ —

$

196

$

$

$

$

64
(21)
1
17

61

5

56

$527
—
—
31

$558

$ —

$558

$62,560

$5,972

$

544

$ 256

$ —

$ —

$62,016

$5,716

$

$

$

$

4,935
(311)
19
730

5,373

334

5,039

$817,529

$

6,919

$ 1,685

$808,925

(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for  credit losses:
Beginning balance —
January 1, 2017

Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provisions

Ending balance —

December 31, 2017

Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment

Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment

Ending balance: Loan

receivables

$

$

$

$

349
(85)
16
(59)

221

3

218

$

$

$

$

2,531
(519)
51
793

2,856

19

2,837

$

$

$

$

709
(683)
23
796

845

123

722

$

969
—
42
117

$ 1,128

$ —

$ 1,128

$93,959

$484,868

$129,535

$75,014

Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment

$ 1,908

Ending balance: acquired

with credit deterioration

$

7

$

$

2,828

936

$

$

2,080

$

514

—

$ —

Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment

$92,044

$481,104

$127,455

$74,500

(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for  credit losses:
Beginning balance —
January 1, 2016

Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provisions

Ending balance —

December 31, 2016

Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment

Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment

Ending balance: Loan

receivables

$

$

$

$

216
(206)
13
326

349

143

206

$

$

$

$

2,375
(39)
—
195

2,531

—

2,531

$

$

$

$

989
(45)
1
(236)

709

97

612

$

$

$

$

569
—
1
399

969

89

880

$87,581

$465,486

$123,175

$72,755

Ending balance: individually
evaluated for impairment

$ 1,760

Ending balance: acquired

with credit deterioration

$

11

$

$

2,919

1,674

$

$

198

$ 1,242

—

$ —

Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for impairment

$85,810

$460,893

$122,977

$71,513

95

The changes in the accretable yield of acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 for the years

ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Beginning balance, January 1
Reclassification of non-accretable discount
Accretion
Payments

Ending balance, December 31

(6) OFFICE PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

(Dollars in thousands)

Land
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Furniture, fixtures and equipment

Total cost
Less accumulated depreciation

Office property and equipment, net

2017

2016

$ 314
92
(97)

$ —
348
(34)
(113) —

$ 196

$314

Estimated
Useful Lives

December 31

2017

2016

5-31.5 years
2-20  years

$

840
13,063
16,658

$

840
12,984
16,094

30,561
(21,912)

29,918
(20,675)

$ 8,649

$ 9,243

Amounts charged to operating expense for depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2017 and

2016 amounted to $1.2 million and $947,000, respectively.

The  Bank  leases  office  space  from  Headwaters  Associates,  a  Pennsylvania  general  partnership  for
which William S. Latoff (who passed away on January 11, 2016), the Company’s former Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer until the time of his death, was one of two general partners. Mary D.
Latoff, a director, was the Executrix for The Estate of William S. Latoff, and in her role as Executrix, had
the sole investment power with respect to the portion of Headwaters owned by the Estate from January 11,
2016  to  December  31,  2016.  On  January  1,  2017,  Ms.  Latoff  became  one  of  two  general  partners  of
Headwaters. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, the Bank paid Headwaters an aggregate of $530,000 in
2017, and $303,000 in 2016. DNB did not make lease payments during the first half of 2016 as the offices
were being restored after the fire that occurred during 2015. Headwaters received $265,000 and $151,000
in 2017 and 2016,  respectively, as a result of the lease.

(7) DEPOSITS

Included  in  interest  bearing  time  deposits  are  time  and  brokered  deposit  issued  in  amounts  of
$250,000  or  more  in  the  amount  of  $59.5  million  and  $78.6  million  at  December  31,  2017  and  2016,
respectively. These certificates and their remaining maturities at  December  31, 2017 were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Three months or less
Over three through six months
Over six  through twelve months
Over one year through two years
Over two years

Total

December 31, 2017
Brokered
Deposits Deposits

Time

Total

$24,058
17,208
11,048
6,648
501

$59,463

$—
—
—
—
—

$—

$24,058
17,208
11,048
6,648
501

$59,463

96

Time and brokered deposit scheduled to mature have  the following remaining  maturities:

(Dollars in thousands)

One  year or less
Over one year through two years
Over two years through three years
Over three years through four years
Over four years through five years
Over five years

Total

December 31, 2017
Brokered
Deposits Deposits

Time

Total

$104,359
25,341
6,620
1,838
2,332
—

$ 4,050
5,924
21,886
4,952
5,000
—

$108,409
31,265
28,506
6,790
7,332
—

$140,490

$41,812

$182,302

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, deposits of related parties amounted to $7.6 million and $7.1 million,

respectively.

The  aggregate  amount  of  demand  deposit  overdrafts  that  were  reclassified  as  loans  was  $265,000  at

December 31, 2017, compared to $309,000 at December 31, 2016.

(8) FHLBP ADVANCES AND SHORT-TERM BORROWED FUNDS

The schedule below provides a summary of short-term borrowings that consist of securities sold under
agreements  to  repurchase,  federal  funds  purchased  with  Atlantic  Community  Bankers  Bank  and  other
borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are overnight borrowings between DNB and
its commercial depositors and are subject to daily repricing. Federal Funds purchased from correspondent
banks mature in one business day and reprice daily based on the Federal Funds rate. As of December 31,
2017,  DNB’s  total  availability  under  Federal  Funds  lines  was  $60.0  million.  Other  short-term  borrowings
consist of credit available through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP) and the Federal
Reserve Discount Window. DNB maintains a line-of-credit (Open Repo Plus) with the FHLBP which is a
revolving  term  commitment  used  on  an  overnight  basis.  The  term  of  this  commitment  may  not  exceed
364  days  and  it  reprices  daily  at  market  rates.  Under  terms  of  a  blanket  collateral  agreement  with  the
FHLBP,  the  line-of-credit  and  long  term  advances  are  secured  by  FHLBP  stock  and  qualifying  loan
receivables,  principally  real  estate  secured  loans.  As  of  December  31,  2017  DNB’s  total  availability  was
$456.9  million  with  the  FHLBP  and  availability  at  the  Federal  Reserve  Discount  Window  is  dependent
upon the market value of the collateral delivered to the Federal Reserve at the time funds are borrowed.

The  following  table  presents  a  summary  of  aggregate  short-term  borrowings  as  of  and  for  the  years

ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

2017

2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Repurchase
Agreements Purchased Agreements Purchased

Repurchase

Federal
Funds

Federal
Funds

Amount outstanding at end of year
Weighted average interest rate at end  of  year
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end
Daily average amount outstanding
Weighted average interest rate for the  year

$12,023

0.20%

$17,028
$14,229

0.20%

$2,372

1.75%

$2,372
$ 143

1.22%

$11,889

0.20%

$22,360
$19,811

0.20%

$ —

—%

$ —
$ 450
0.51%

Total  other  borrowings  at  December  31,  2017  and  2016  consist  of  amounts  described  above  and  the

capital lease obligation in Note 9.

97

Repurchase agreements accounted for as  secured borrowings are shown  in the following table.

(Dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2017
Repurchase agreements and

Overnight
and
Continuous

Up to
30 days

30-90 days

Greater
than
90 days

Total

repurchase-to-maturity transactions

$12,023

$—

$—

$—

$12,023

Gross amount of recognized liabilities  for
repurchase agreements in statement  of
condition

December 31, 2016
Repurchase agreements and

$12,023

$12,023

repurchase-to-maturity transactions

$11,889

$—

$—

$—

$11,889

Gross amount of recognized liabilities  for
repurchase agreements in statement  of
condition

$11,889

$11,889

As  of  December  31,  2017  and  December  31,  2016,  DNB  had  $12.0  million  and  $11.9  million  of
repurchase  agreements,  respectively.  In  conjunction  with  these  repurchase  agreements,  a  fair  value  of
$12.3  million  and  $12.1  million  of  state  and  municipal  securities  were  sold  on  an  overnight  basis  as  of
December  31,  2017  and  December  31,  2016,  respectively,  which  represents  102%  of  the  repurchase
agreement amount. DNB may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the
underlying  securities.  Daily  procedures  are  followed  to  ensure  repurchase  agreements  are  properly
collateralized.

In  addition  to  short-term  borrowings,  DNB  maintains  borrowing  arrangements  with  the  FHLBP  to
meet  borrowing  needs  exceeding  30  days.  The  advances  are  collateralized  by  loans,  and  a  lien  on  the
Bank’s FHLBP stock. There were $648.0 million in loans used as collateral for FHLBP borrowings. After a
collateral weighting of 70.51%, DNB’s maximum borrowing capacity totaled $456.9 million. In addition to
the $79.0 million of borrowings from the FHLBP at December 31, 2017, the FHLBP had issued letters of
credit, on DNB’s behalf, totaling $65.0 million against DNB’s available credit lines. These letters of credit
were used to secure public deposits as required by law.

(Dollars in thousands)

Due by December 31, 2017
Due by December 31, 2018
Due by December 31, 2019
Due by December 31, 2020
Due by December 31, 2021
Due by December 31, 2022

Total

(9) OTHER BORROWINGS

December 31, 2017
Weighted
Average
Rate

Amount

December 31, 2016
Weighted
Average
Rate

Amount

—% $ —
46,078
14,592
11,343
—
7,000

1.30
1.43
1.64
0.00
2.04

0.96% $23,319
0.05
6,078
14,592
1.43
11,343
1.64
—
0.00
—
0.00

1.44%

$79,013

1.13% $55,332

Included  in  other  borrowings  is  a  long-term  capital  lease  agreement,  which  relates  to  DNB’s  West
Goshen  branch.  As  of  December  31,  2017  the  capital  lease  has  a  carrying  amount  of  $137,000  net  of

98

accumulated depreciation of $613,000, and is included in the balance of office properties and equipment in
the  accompanying  statements  of  financial  condition.  The  following  is  a  schedule  of  the  future  minimum
capital  lease  payments,  together  with  the  present  value  of  the  net  minimum  lease  payments,  as  of
December 31, 2017:

(Dollars in thousands)

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter

Total minimum lease payments
Less amount representing interest

Present value of net minimum lease payments

Year ended
December 31

$ 106
107
106
107
69
—

495
(129)

$ 366

DNB  recognized  rent  expense  of  $1.2  million  and  $755,000  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2017
and 2016, respectively. The following is a schedule of the future minimum non-cancelable operating lease
payments for the Operations Center  in Downingtown  and leased branches as  of December  31, 2017.

(Dollars in thousands)

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter

Total minimum lease payments

Year ended
December 31

$1,113
1,040
792
626
465
194

$4,230

(10) SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES  AND NOTES

DNB has two issuances of junior subordinated debentures (the ‘‘debentures’’) as follows. The majority
of the proceeds of each issuance were invested in DNB’s subsidiary, to increase the Bank’s capital levels.
The  junior  subordinated  debentures  issued  in  each  case  qualify  as  a  component  of  capital  for  regulatory
purposes.  DNB  Capital  Trust  I  and  II  are  special  purpose  Delaware  business  trusts,  which  are  not
consolidated.

DNB Capital Trust I

DNB’s  first  issuance  of  junior  subordinated  debentures  was  on  July  20,  2001.  This  issuance  of
debentures are at floating rates and were issued to DNB Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust in which
DNB owns all of the common equity. DNB Capital Trust I issued $5 million of floating rate (6 month Libor
plus 3.75%, with a cap of 12%) capital preferred securities to a qualified institutional buyer. The proceeds
of these securities were used by the Trust, along with DNB’s capital contribution, to purchase $5,155,000
principal  amount  of  DNB’s  floating  rate  junior  subordinated  debentures.  The  preferred  securities  have
been redeemable since July 25, 2006 and must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures on July 25,
2031.

99

DNB Capital Trust II

DNB’s  second  issuance  of  junior  subordinated  debentures  was  on  March  30,  2005.  This  issuance  of
debentures  are  at  floating  rates  and  were  issued  to  DNB  Capital  Trust  II,  a  Delaware  business  trust  in
which DNB owns all of the common equity. DNB Capital Trust II issued $4.0 million of floating rate (the
rate was fixed at 6.56% for the first 5 years and is now adjusting at a rate of 3-month LIBOR plus 1.77%)
capital  preferred  securities.  The  proceeds  of  these  securities  were  used  by  the  Trust,  along  with  DNB’s
capital contribution, to purchase $4,124,000 principal amount of DNB’s floating rate junior subordinated
debentures. The preferred securities have been redeemable since May 23, 2010. The preferred securities
must be redeemed upon maturity of the debentures  on May 23, 2035.

Subordinated Note

On  March  5,  2015,  DNB  Financial  Corporation  entered  into  a  Subordinated  Note  Purchase
Agreement  (the  ‘‘Agreement’’)  with  an  accredited  investor  under  which  the  Company  issued  a
$9.75  million  subordinated  note  (the  ‘‘Note’’)  to  the  investor.  The  Note  has  a  maturity  date  of  March  6,
2025, and bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.25% per annum for the first 5 years and then will float at the
Wall  Street  Journal  Prime  rate  plus  1.00%,  provided  that  the  interest  rate  applicable  to  the  outstanding
principal balance will at no time be less than 3.0%  or greater than 5.75% per annum.

DNB may, at its option, beginning with the first interest payment date after March 6, 2019, and on any
interest  payment  date  thereafter,  redeem  the  Note,  in  whole  or  in  part,  at  par  plus  accrued  and  unpaid
interest to the date of redemption. The Note is not subject to repayment at the option of the noteholder.

The  Note  is  unsecured  and  ranks  junior  in  right  of  payment  to  DNB’s  senior  indebtedness  and  to

DNB’s obligations to its general creditors  and qualifies  as Tier 2 capital for  regulatory purposes.

(11) FAIR VALUES

FASB  ASC  Topic  820,  Fair  Value  Measurements  and  Disclosures,  establishes  a  fair  value  hierarchy
based  on  the  nature  of  data  inputs  for  fair  value  determinations,  under  which  DNB  is  required  to  value
each asset within its scope using assumptions that market participations would utilize to value that asset.
When  DNB  uses  its  own  assumptions,  it  is  required  to  disclose  additional  information  about  the
assumptions used and the effect of the measurement on earnings or the net change in assets for the period.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under  FASB ASC Topic  820 are as  follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets  for identical securities.

Level  2  —  Quoted  prices  for  similar  instruments  in  active  markets;  quoted  prices  for  identical  or
similar  instruments  in  markets  that  are  not  active  and  model  derived  valuations  whose  inputs  are
observable or whose significant value drivers  are observable.

Level 3 — Instruments whose significant  value  drivers are  unobservable.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value is set forth below:

DNB’s available-for-sale investment securities, which generally include U.S. government agencies and
mortgage backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities,
and state and municipal tax-exempt securities are reported at fair value. These securities are valued by an
independent third party (‘‘preparer’’). The preparer’s evaluations are based on market data. They utilize
evaluated  pricing  models  that  vary  by  asset  and  incorporate  available  trade,  bid  and  other  market
information.  For  securities  that  do  not  trade  on  a  daily  basis,  their  evaluated  pricing  applications  apply
available information such as benchmarking and matrix pricing. The market inputs normally sought in the
evaluation  of  securities  include  benchmark  yields,  reported  trades,  broker/dealer  quotes  (only  obtained
from  market  makers  or  broker/dealers  recognized  as  market  participants),  issuer  spreads,  two-sided

100

markets, benchmark securities, bid, offers and reference data. For certain securities additional inputs may
be used or some market inputs may not be applicable. Inputs are prioritized differently on any given day
based on market conditions.

U.S.  Government  agencies  are  evaluated  and  priced  using  multi-dimensional  relational  models  and
option  adjusted  spreads.  State  and  municipal  securities  are  evaluated  on  a  series  of  matrices  including
reported  trades  and  material  event  notices.  Mortgage  backed  securities  are  evaluated  using  matrix
correlation  to  treasury  or  floating  index  benchmarks,  prepayment  speeds,  monthly  payment  information
and other benchmarks. Other investments are evaluated using a broker-quote based application, including
quotes from issuers.

Impaired  loans  are  those  loans  that  the  Bank  has  measured  impairment  generally  based  on  the  fair
value  of  the  loan’s  collateral.  Fair  value  is  generally  determined  based  upon  independent  third-party
appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are
included  as  Level  3  fair  values,  based  upon  the  lowest  level  of  input  that  is  significant  to  the  fair  value
measurements.

OREO  assets  are  adjusted  to  fair  value  less  estimated  selling  costs  upon  transfer  of  the  loans  to
OREO. Subsequently, OREO assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is
based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of
the value of the collateral. There assets are included as level 3 fair values.

The  following  table  summarizes  the  assets  at  December  31,  2017  and  December  31,  2016  that  are
recognized on DNB’s balance sheet using fair value measurement determined based on the differing levels
of input.

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring  Basis
Impaired loans
OREO  & other repossessed property

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

December 31, 2017

Level 1

Level 2

Assets at
Level 3 Fair Value

$—
—
—
—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

$ 52,893
32,488
11,654
12,820
1,928

$ — $ 52,893
32,488
11,654
12,820
1,928

—
—
—
—

$111,783

$ — $111,783

$

$

— $1,814
817
—

— $2,631

$

$

1,814
817

2,631

101

(Dollars in thousands)

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
US Government agency obligations
GSE mortgage-backed securities
Collateralized mortgage obligations GSE
Corporate bonds
State and municipal tax-exempt
Asset-backed security

Total assets measured at fair value on  a  recurring basis

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring  Basis
Impaired loans
OREO  & other repossessed property

Total assets measured at fair value on  a  nonrecurring basis

December 31, 2016

Level 1

Level 2

Assets at
Level 3 Fair Value

$—
—
—
—
—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

$ 52,309
30,140
12,573
15,180
4,956
26

$ — $ 52,309
30,140
12,573
15,180
4,956
26

—
—
—
—
—

$115,184

$ — $115,184

$

$

— $1,538
— 2,485

— $4,023

$

$

1,538
2,485

4,023

The  following  table  presents  additional  information  about  assets  measured  at  fair  value  on  a

nonrecurring basis and for which DNB has  utilized  Level 3 inputs to determine  fair value:

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement
December 31, 2017

Fair Value Valuation
Estimate Techniques

Unobservable
Input

Range
(Weighted Average)

(Dollars in thousands)

Impaired loans —

Residential mortgage

$

4

Impaired loans —

Commercial mortgage

Impaired loans —

Commercial term

Impaired loans —
Consumer other

Impaired loan total

Other real estate owned

46

1,648

116

$1,814

$ 817

0%

0%  to 

Appraisal of Appraisal adj.(2)
(0%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)
Appraisal of Appraisal adj.(2)
(0%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)
0%  to (cid:5)50% ((cid:5)6%)
Appraisal of Appraisal adj.(2)
0%  to (cid:5)9% ((cid:5)8%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2)
Appraisal of Appraisal adj.(2)
(0%)
0%
0%  to 
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)

0%  to 

0%

Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)

102

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement
December 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Impaired loans —

Residential mortgage

$ 964

Impaired loans —

Commercial term

Impaired loans —

Commercial construction

Impaired loans —
Consumer other

Impaired loan total

Other real estate owned

79

358

137

$1,538

$2,485

Fair Value Valuation
Estimate Techniques

Unobservable
Input

Range
(Weighted Average)
0%  to (cid:5)25% ((cid:5)22%)
Appraisal of Appraisal  adj.(2)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)12% ((cid:5)9%)
Appraisal of Appraisal  adj.(2) (cid:5)72%  to (cid:5)72% ((cid:5)72%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)11%  to (cid:5)11% ((cid:5)11%)
Appraisal of Appraisal  adj.(2)
(0%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)
Appraisal of Appraisal  adj.(2)
(0%)
collateral(1) Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)

0%  to 

0%  to 

0%

0%

Disposal costs(2) (cid:5)8%  to (cid:5)8% ((cid:5)8%)

(1) Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals or sales contracts of the underlying

collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which  are not identifiable.

(2) Appraisals  are  adjusted  by  management  for  qualitative  factors,  such  as  economic  conditions  and

estimated disposal costs.

Impaired  loans.

Impaired  loans,  which  are  measured  for  impairment  using  the  fair  value  of  the
collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $9.1 million at December 31, 2017. Of
this,  $491,000  had  specific  valuation  allowances  of  $157,000,  leaving  a  fair  value  of  $334,000  as  of
December 31, 2017. In addition, DNB had $1.9 million in impaired loans that were partially charged down
by  $442,000,  leaving  $1.5  million  at  fair  value  as  of  December  31,  2017.  The  total  fair  value  of  impaired
loans at December 31, 2017 was $1.8 million.

Impaired loans had a carrying amount of $8.6 million at December 31, 2016. Of this, $1.9 million had
specific valuation allowances of $334,000, leaving a fair value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2016. DNB
did  not  have  any  impaired  loans  that  were  partially  charged  down  during  the  year  ended  December  31,
2016.

Other Real Estate Owned & other repossessed property Other real estate owned (‘‘OREO’’) consists of
properties  acquired  as  a  result  of,  or  in-lieu-of,  foreclosure.  Properties  or  other  assets  are  classified  as
OREO  and  other  repossessed  property  are  initially  recorded  at  fair  value  less  cost  to  sell  at  the  date  of
foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed
by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less estimated costs
to sell. Costs relating to the development or improvement of the assets are capitalized and costs relating to
holding  the  assets  are  charged  to  expense.  DNB  had  $5.0  million  of  such  assets  at  December  31,  2017,
which  consisted  of  $4.8  million  in  OREO  and  $177,000  in  other  repossessed  property.  DNB  had
$2.8 million of such assets at December 31, 2016, which consisted of $2.6 million in OREO and $191,000 in
other repossessed property. Subsequent to the repossession of these assets, DNB wrote down the carrying
values  of  certain  assets  totaling  $956,000  by  $139,000  to  $817,000  in  OREO  during  the  year  ended
December 31, 2017. DNB wrote down the carrying values of certain assets totaling $3.0 million by $505,000
in OREO during the year ended December 31, 2016.

103

Below is management’s estimate of the fair value of all financial instruments, whether carried at cost
or  fair  value  on  DNB’s  consolidated  balance  sheet.  The  carrying  amounts  and  estimated  fair  values  of
financial instruments at December 31,  2017 and December 31, 2016 are as  follows:

December 31, 2017

Level 1

Level  2

Level 3

$10,917

$

— $

—
—
— 111,783
2,000
60,420
—
—
7,641
—
—
—
657
— 821,672
—
—
—

3,822

— 176,815
— 502,086
— 139,406
42,304
—
12,023
—
78,531
—

—
—
—
—

9,373
9,577
554
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—

(Dollars in thousands)

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
AFS investment securities
HTM investment securities
Restricted stock
Loans held for sale
Loans, net of allowance, including impaired
Accrued interest receivable
Financial liabilities
Deposits:

Non-interest-bearing deposits
Other interest-bearing deposits
Time
Brokered deposits
Repurchase agreements
FHLBP advances
Junior subordinated debentures and  other

borrowings

Subordinated debt
Accrued interest payable
Off-balance sheet instruments

Carrying
Amount

Estimated
Fair
Value

$ 10,917
111,783
62,390
7,641
651
840,054
3,822

$ 10,917
111,783
62,420
7,641
657
821,672
3,822

176,815
502,086
140,490
41,812
12,023
79,013

9,279
9,750
554
—

176,815
502,086
139,406
42,304
12,023
78,531

9,373
9,577
554
—

104

December 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
AFS investment securities
HTM investment securities
Restricted stock
Loans, net of allowance, including impaired
Accrued interest receivable
Financial liabilities
Deposits:

Non-interest-bearing deposits
Other interest-bearing deposits
Time
Brokered deposits
Repurchase agreements
FHLBP advances
Junior subordinated debentures and  other

borrowings

Subordinated debt
Accrued interest payable
Off-balance sheet instruments

Carrying
Amount

Estimated
Fair
Value

$ 22,103
115,184
67,022
5,381
812,156
3,567

$ 22,103
115,184
66,124
5,381
792,190
3,567

173,467
495,178
187,256
29,286
11,889
55,332

9,279
9,750
534
—

173,467
495,178
186,012
28,873
11,889
54,734

8,637
10,493
534
—

Level 1

Level  2

Level 3

$22,103

$

— 115,184
64,124
—
5,381
—
—
—

3,567

— $

—
—
2,000
—
— 792,190
—

— 173,467
— 495,178
— 186,012
28,873
—
11,889
—
54,734
—

—
—
—
—

8,637
10,493
534
—

—
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—
—

The specific estimation methods and assumptions used can have a substantial impact on the resulting
fair values of financial instruments. Following is a brief summary of the significant assumptions, methods,
and estimates used in estimating fair  value.

Limitations Fair  value  estimates  are  made  at  a  specific  point  in  time,  based  on  relevant  market
information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that
could result from offering for sale at one time DNB’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
Because no market exists for a significant portion of DNB’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are
based  on  judgments  regarding  future  expected  loss  experience,  current  economic  conditions,  risk
characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature
and  involve  uncertainties  and  matters  of  significant  judgment  and  therefore  cannot  be  determined  with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect  the estimates.

Cash  and  Cash  Equivalents,  Accrued  Interest  Receivable  and  Accrued  Interest  Payable The  carrying
amounts  for  short-term  investments  (cash  and  cash  equivalents)  and  accrued  interest  receivable  and
payable approximate fair value.

Loans  Held-for-Sale  (Carried  at  Lower  of  Cost  or  Fair  Value) The  fair  value  of  loans  held-for-sale  is
determined, when possible, using quoted secondary-market prices. If no such quotes prices exist, the fair
value  of  a  loan  is  determined  using  quoted  prices  for  a  similar  loan  or  loans,  adjusted  for  the  specific
attributes of that loan.

Loans Fair  values  are  estimated  for  portfolios  of  loans  with  similar  financial  characteristics.  Loans
are  segregated  by  type  such  as  commercial,  commercial  mortgages,  residential  mortgages,  consumer  and
non-accrual  loans.  The  fair  value  of  performing  loans  is  calculated  by  discounting  expected  cash  flows
using  an  estimated  market  discount  rate.  Expected  cash  flows  include  both  contractual  cash  flows  and
prepayments  of  loan  balances.  Prepayments  on  consumer  loans  were  determined  using  the  median  of
estimates of securities dealers for mortgage-backed investment pools.

105

The estimated discount rate considers credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan portfolios and
other factors such as liquidity premiums and incremental servicing costs to an investor. Management has
made estimates of fair value discount rates that it believes to be reasonable. However, because there is no
market  for  many  of  these  financial  instruments,  management  has  no  basis  to  determine  whether  the  fair
value presented would be indicative of  the value  negotiated in an actual  sale.

The  fair  value  for  non-accrual  loans  not  based  on  fair  value  of  collateral  was  derived  through  a
discounted cash flow analysis, which includes the opportunity costs of carrying a non-performing asset. An
estimated  discount  rate  was  used  for  these  non-accrual  loans,  based  on  the  probability  of  loss  and  the
expected time to recovery.

Deposits and Repurchase Agreements The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition,
equal  to  the  amount  payable  on  demand  at  the  reporting  date  (that  is,  their  carrying  amounts).  The
carrying amounts of variable-rate money market accounts, savings accounts, and interest checking accounts
approximate  their  fair  values  at  the  reporting  date.  Fair  values  for  fixed-rate  CDs  are  estimated  using  a
discounted  cash  flow  calculation  that  applies  interest  rates  currently  being  offered  on  certificates  to  a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on  time  deposits.

Short-Term  Borrowings The  carrying  amounts  of  federal  funds  purchased,  borrowings  under
repurchase  agreements,  and  other  short-term  borrowings  maturing  within  90  days  approximate  their  fair
values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based
on DNB’s current incremental borrowing rates  for similar types of  borrowing  arrangements.

Long-Term  Debt The  fair  value  of  DNB’s  fixed  rate  long-term  borrowings  which  includes  FHLBP
advances,  subordinated  note,  junior  subordinated  debentures,  and  other  borrowings  is  estimated  using  a
discounted cash flow analysis based on the open market’s rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
The carrying amounts of variable-rate long-term borrowings approximate their fair values at the reporting
date.

Restricted  Stock The  carrying  amount  of  restricted  investment  in  Federal  Home  Loan  Bank  stock,
Federal Reserve stock and ACBB stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of
such securities.

Accrued  Interest  Receivable  and  Payable The  carrying  amount  of  accrued  interest  receivable  and

accrued interest payable approximates its  fair  value.

Off-balance-sheet  Instruments  (Disclosed  at  Cost) Off-balance-sheet 

instruments  are  primarily
comprised  of  loan  commitments,  which  are  generally  priced  at  market  at  the  time  of  funding.  Fees  on
commitments  to  extend  credit  and  stand-by  letters  of  credit  are  deemed  to  be  immaterial  and  these
instruments  are  expected  to  be  settled  at  face  value  or  expire  unused.  It  is  impractical  to  assign  any  fair
value to these instruments.

106

(12) FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was comprised of the  following:

(Dollars in thousands)

Current tax expense:

Federal
State

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:

Federal

Income tax expense

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$3,121
6

$1,515
10

2,329

344

$5,456

$1,869

The  effective  income  tax  rates  of  40.71%  for  2017  and  27.29%  for  2016  were  different  than  the

applicable statutory Federal income tax  rate of 34%. The reason for these  differences follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Federal income taxes at statutory rate
Decrease resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest and dividend preference
Rate change
Stock  options
Bank owned life insurance
Other, net (decrease) increase

Income tax expense

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$4,557

$2,328

(469)
1,846
(331)
(145)
(2)

(643)
—
—
(77)
261

$5,456

$1,869

107

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities

are presented below:

(Dollars in thousands)

Deferred tax assets:

Allowance for credit losses
Unrealized losses on securities
Unrealized losses on reclassified securities
Unrealized loss on pension obligation
Capital loss disallowance
State net operating losses
Unvested stock awards
Deferred compensation (SERP)
Nonqualified stock options
Depreciation
Pension
Non-accrued interest
Provision for unfunded loans
OREO  write-downs
Core deposit intangible
Accrued expenses
Purchase accounting loan general credit  mark
Purchase accounting loan specific credit mark
Purchase accounting loan interest rate  mark
Purchase accounting CD rate mark
Purchase accounting term FHLBP advances
Organization costs
Other reserves — reserve for unfunded

Total gross deferred tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Depreciation
Pension expense
Bank shares tax credit
Prepaid expenses
Mortgage servicing rights
Deferred gain from insurance proceeds
Bad debt reserve
Market discount accretion
Purchase accounting core deposit intangible
Prepaid expenses (acquired)
Other reserves — reserve for unfunded
Purchase accounting deferred loan fees

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax asset

December 31
2016
2017

$ 1,227
372
—
388
2
739
70
435
11
—
24
501
73
38
11
57
584
51
84
60
34
10
—

$ 1,827
560
2
609
4
620
103
680
48
123
6
661
117
52
16
165
1,482
273
96
236
163
23
29

4,771

7,895

(180)
—
(140)
(173)
(29)
—
(117)
—
(83)
—
(6)
(323)

—
—
(204)
(313)
(44)
(401)
(241)
(18)
(165)
(23)
—
(615)

(1,051)

(2,024)

(740)

(621)

$ 2,980

$ 5,250

As  of  December  31,  2017,  DNB  had  no  material  unrecognized  tax  benefits  or  accrued  interest  and
penalties.  It  is  DNB’s  policy  to  account  for  interest  and  penalties  accrued  relative  to  unrecognized  tax

108

benefits as a component of income tax expense. Federal and state tax years 2014 through 2016 were open
for examination as of December 31, 2017. On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 118 (‘‘SAB 118’’), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740, Income
Taxes.  The  Company’s  financial  results  reflect  the  income  tax  effects  of  the  Tax  Cuts  and  Jobs  Act  for
which the accounting under ASC Topic 740 is complete. On December 22, 2017, commonly known as the
Tax  Cuts  and  Jobs  Act,  was  signed  into  law.  The  Act  includes  many  provisions  that  will  effect  DNB’s
income  tax  expenses,  including  reducing  the  corporate  federal  tax  rate  from  34%  to  21%  effective
January 1, 2018. As a result of the rate reduction, DNB was required to re-measure, through income tax
expense in the period of enactment, its deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted rate at which
DNB expects them to be recovered or settled. The re-measurement of the net deferred tax asset resulted in
additional income tax expense of $1.8  million.

DNB had net state operating loss carryovers with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania of $10.5 million
and $8.7 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively for which a full valuation allowance has been
established. These carryovers will begin  to  expire  in 2021.

(13) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic  earnings  per  share  (‘‘EPS’’)  is  computed  based  on  the  weighted  average  number  of  common
shares  outstanding  during  the  period.  Diluted  EPS  is  computed  using  the  treasury  stock  method  and
reflects the potential dilution that could occur from the exercise of stock options and the amortized portion
of  unvested  stock  awards.  Stock  options  and  unvested  stock  awards  for  which  the  exercise  or  the  grant
price  exceeds  the  average  market  price  over  the  period  have  an  anti-dilutive  effect  on  EPS  and,
accordingly,  are  excluded  from  the  calculation.  Treasury  shares  are  not  deemed  outstanding  for  earnings
per  share  calculations.  There  were  no  anti-dilutive  stock  options  outstanding,  and  no  anti-dilutive  stock
awards  at  December  31,  2017.  There  were  no  anti-dilutive  stock  options  outstanding,  and  14,100
anti-dilutive stock awards at December 31, 2016. The following table sets forth the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share:

(In thousands,
except per share data)

Basic EPS
Net income available to common

stockholders

Effect of potential dilutive common stock

equivalents — stock options and
restricted shares

Diluted EPS
Income available to common stockholders

Year Ended December 31

2017

2016

Income

Shares Amount

Income

Shares Amount

$7,946

4,260

$ 1.87

$4,979

3,186

$ 1.56

—

30

(0.02)

—

33

(0.01)

after assumed exercises

$7,946

4,290

$ 1.85

$4,979

3,219

$ 1.55

(14) BENEFIT PLANS

Pension Plan The Bank maintains a defined benefit pension plan (the ‘‘Plan’’) covering all employees,
including officers, who have been employed for one year and have attained 21 years of age. Prior to May 1,
1985, an individual must have attained the age of 25 and accrued one year of service. The Plan provides
pension benefits to eligible retired employees at 65 years of age equal to 1.5% of their average monthly pay

109

multiplied  by  their  years  of  accredited  service  (maximum  40  years).  The  accrued  benefit  is  based  on  the
monthly average of their highest five consecutive years of their last ten years of service. The Plan generally
covers only full-time employees.

Effective  December  31,  2003,  DNB  amended  its  Plan  to  curtail  future  eligibility  and  so  that  no
participants  will  earn  additional  benefits  under  the  Plan  after  December  31,  2003.  As  a  result  of  this
amendment, no further service or compensation was credited under the Plan after December 31, 2003. The
Plan,  although  frozen,  will  continue  to  provide  benefit  payments  and  eligible  employees  can  still  earn
vesting credits until retirement.

The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of plan assets, changes in the projected
benefit  obligation  (PBO),  the  funded  status  of  both  the  accumulated  benefit  obligation  (ABO)  and  the
PBO, and the weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for the pension plan at
December 31, 2017 and 2016. Amounts recognized at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are reflected in other
assets,  and  in  accrued  expenses  and  other  liabilities  on  the  Consolidated  Statements  of  Financial
Condition.  The  estimation  of  DNB’s  PBO  associated  with  these  plans  considers  various  actuarial
assumptions for mortality rates and discount rates.

The following table sets forth the Plan’s funded status, as of the measurement dates of December 31,
2017 and 2016 and amounts recognized in DNB’s consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2017
and 2016:

(Dollars in thousands)

Projected benefit obligation

Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets

Amounts recognized in the statement of  financial condition consist of:
Other liabilities

Funded status

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
Net loss

Total

December 31
2016
2017

$(6,925) $(6,695)

(6,925)
4,960

(6,695)
4,887

$(1,965) $(1,808)

$(1,965) $(1,808)

$ 1,849

$ 1,792

$ 1,849

$ 1,792

110

The  amounts  and  changes  in  DNB’s  pension  benefit  obligation  and  fair  value  of  plan  assets  for  the

years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016  are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Change in benefit obligation

Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Interest cost
Actuarial loss
Benefits paid

Benefit obligation at end of year

Change in plan assets

Fair value of assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contribution
Benefits paid
Estimated expenses

Fair value of assets at end of year

Year ended December 31

2017

2016

$6,695
262
603
(635)

$6,925

$4,887
575
211
(635)
(78)

$4,960

$6,583
254
143
(285)

$6,695

$4,851
304
93
(285)
(76)

$4,887

The Plan’s assets are invested using an asset allocation strategy in units of certain equity, bond, real
estate and money market funds. The following table summarizes the weighted average asset allocations as
of the dates indicated:

Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities
Fixed income securities

Total

December 31
2016
2017

3.3% 3.5%
53.1
43.6

53.0
43.5

100.0% 100.0%

Equity  securities  consist  mainly  of  equity  common  trust  funds  and  mutual  funds.  Fixed  income
securities  consist  mainly  of  fixed  income  common  trust  funds.  Pension  plan  assets  are  invested  with  a
moderate  growth  objective,  with  target  asset  allocations  of  approximately  50  -  60%  bonds  and  cash  and
approximately 40 - 50% in stocks. As of December 31, 2017, the plan held 46.9% of its assets in bonds and
cash.

111

Net periodic pension costs for the years  indicated include the  following  components:

(Dollars in thousands)

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Recognized net actuarial loss*
Recognized actuarial loss due to settlements

Net periodic cost

Assumptions used:
Discount rate:
Obligation
Expense

Rate of increase in compensation level
Expected long-term rate of return on  assets

Year Ended December 31

2017

$ 65
262
(257)
133
106

$ 309

3.61%
4.09
N/A
5.50

2016

$ 59
254
(252)
128
—

$ 189

4.09%
4.05
N/A
5.50

* Amounts are included in ‘‘Salaries and employee benefits’’ in the consolidated statements of income.

In  selecting  the  expected  long-term  rate  of  return  on  assets  used  for  the  Plan,  DNB  considered  the
average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits of the
Plan. This included considering the asset allocation and the expected returns likely to be earned over the
life of the plan. This basis is consistent with the prior year. The discount rate is the rate used to determine
the present value of DNB’s future benefit obligations for its pension. The projected benefit obligation at
December 31, 2017 and 2016 was determined using a variation of the RP-2014 mortality tables published
by the Society of Actuaries.

DNB anticipates making contributions to the plan totaling $267,000 in 2018. DNB’s estimated future

benefit payments are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Period

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023-2027

Benefits

$ 469
475
1,059
917
256
2,072

The  estimated  components  of  net  periodic  benefit  cost  and  other  amounts  recognized  in  other

comprehensive income during the 2018  fiscal year are as  follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of net loss

Estimated 2018 net periodic benefit cost

$ 80
242
(267)
136

$ 191

112

The fair value of DNB’s pension plan assets  by  asset category are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Mutual fund — equity:

US equities
International equities
Real estate

Mutual funds — fixed income:

Domestic fixed income

US corporate bonds, notes and cash:

Cash

December 31, 2017

Assets at
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value

$1,227
1,273
133

2,163

164

$—
—
—

—

—

$—
—
—

—

—

$—

$1,227
1,273
133

2,163

164

$4,960

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring  basis

$4,960

$—

(Dollars in thousands)

Mutual fund — equity:

US equities
International equities
Real estate

Mutual funds — fixed income:

Domestic fixed income

US corporate bonds, notes and cash:

Cash

Total assets measured at fair value on  a  recurring  basis

December 31, 2016

Assets at
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value

$1,398
1,080
113

2,128

168

$4,887

$—
—
—

—

—

$—

$—
—
—

—

—

$—

$1,398
1,080
113

2,128

168

$4,887

Retirement and Death Benefit Agreement During 1999, the Bank and Henry F. Thorne, its then current
Chief  Executive  Officer  (the  ‘‘Executive’’),  entered  into  a  Death  Benefit  Agreement  providing  for
supplemental death and retirement benefits for him (the ‘‘Supplemental Plan’’). In 2003, the Supplemental
Plan was replaced by a Retirement and Death  Benefit Agreement (the ‘‘Replacement  Plan’’).

The  Replacement  Plan  provides  that  the  Bank  and  the  Executive  share  in  the  rights  to  the  cash
surrender  value  and  death  benefits  of  a  split-dollar  life  insurance  policy  (the  ‘‘Policy’’).  The  policy  is
designed  to  provide  the  Executive,  upon  attaining  age  65,  with  projected  annual  after-tax  payments  of
approximately $35,000. In addition, the Policy is intended to provide the Executive with a projected death
benefit of $750,000.

In July 2008, DNB commenced making monthly payments of $3,658 to the Executive. The remaining
liability  under  the  plan  was  $738,000  and  $739,000  as  of  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  respectively.  The
annual expense for the same respective periods was $57,000 and  $56,000.

Supplemental  Executive  Retirement  Plan  for  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

(William  S.  Latoff
passed away on January 11, 2016) DNB has an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (also
known as a SERP) for its former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, William S. Latoff. The purpose of
the SERP was to provide Mr. Latoff a pension supplement beginning at age 70 to compensate him for the
loss of retirement plan funding opportunities from his other business interests because of his commitments
to DNB as Chairman and CEO. The liability based on the contract is $1.3 million at December 31, 2017.
This amount will be paid out in 2019.

113

DNB  has  an  unfunded  Supplemental  Executive  Retirement  Plan  (also  known  as  a  SERP)  for
William J. Hieb, DNB’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gerald F. Sopp, DNB’s Executive Vice
President,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Corporate  Secretary  (each,  a  ‘‘SERP,’’  and  collectively,  the
‘‘SERPs’’).  The  SERPs  contain  identical  terms.  Accordingly,  each  of  Mr.  Hieb  and  Mr.  Sopp  shall  be
referred  to  as  the  ‘‘Executive’’  below.  Pursuant  to  the  SERP,  in  the  event  that  the  Executive  remains
continuously employed by DNB until his 67th birthday, DNB shall pay to him a monthly retirement benefit
for 180 months commencing on the first day of the first month following his 67th birthday. The monthly
retirement benefit will be 2.5% of the average of the sum of the Executive’s base salary and cash bonuses
paid to him during the three calendar years ending immediately prior to his 67th birthday, except that the
base  salary  for  any  year  shall  never  be  less  than  the  base  salary  in  effect  on  October  25,  2017.  DNB’s
liability to Mr. Hieb’s and Mr. Sopp’s  SERP  was $39,000 and $32,000, respectively in  2017.

401(k) Retirement Savings Plan The Bank has adopted a retirement savings 401(k) plan. Participants
are  permitted  to  authorize  pre-tax  savings  contributions  to  a  separate  trust  established  under  the  401(k)
plan, subject to limitations on deductibility of contributions imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The
plan  allows  after-tax  contributions  to  be  made  as  well.  The  contributions  are  subject  to  the  same
limitations. Management evaluates discretionary matching contributions each quarter based upon DNB’s
financial performance. DNB made no matching contributions to the 401(k) plan in 2017  and 2016.

Profit  Sharing  Plan The  Bank  maintains  a  Profit  Sharing  Plan  for  eligible  employees.  The  plan
provides  that  the  Bank  make  contributions  equal  to  3%  of  the  eligible  participant’s  W-2  wages.  DNB’s
related  expense  associated  with  the  Profit  Sharing  Plan  was  $376,000  and  $304,000  in  2017  and  2016,
respectively.

Stock Option Plan DNB has a Stock Option Plan for employees and directors. Under the plan, options
(both  qualified  and  non-qualified)  to  purchase  a  maximum  of  793,368  (as  adjusted  for  subsequent  stock
dividends) shares of DNB’s common  stock could be issued to employees  and directors.

Under the plan, option exercise prices must equal the fair market value of the shares on the date of
option grant and the option exercise period may not exceed ten years. Vesting of options under the plan is
determined by the Plan Committee. There were 354,090 shares available for grant at December 31, 2017
and  2016.  All  options  currently  outstanding  are  immediately  exercisable.  DNB  fully  recorded  all  stock
option expense by  the end of 2014. DNB had no stock option expense in 2017  or 2016.

The  award  agreement  provides  that,  upon  issuance  of  the  plan  shares,  the  grantee  may  elect  to  pay
federal withholding taxes on the award in cash or by electing to apply some of the awarded shares at their
fair market value, or both. Under the Stock Option Plan, 33,250 shares were exercised in 2017. The shares
awarded from the non-qualified cashless exercises resulted in an increase in shares outstanding of 14,748.
There was a cash equivalent of 18,502 shares used to pay all applicable taxes on the transactions. Under
the Stock Option Plan, 14,800 shares were exercised in 2016. The shares awarded from the non-qualified

114

cashless  exercises  resulted  in  an  increase  in  shares  outstanding  of  5,824.  There  was  a  cash  equivalent  of
8,976 shares used to pay all applicable taxes on the transactions. Stock option activity is indicated below:

Outstanding January 1, 2016

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired

Outstanding December 31, 2016

Issued
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired

Outstanding December 31, 2017

Number
Outstanding

Weighted Average
Exercise Price

64,500
—
(14,800)
—
—

49,700
—
(33,250)
—
—

16,450

$ 8.67
—
6.93
—
—

$ 9.18
—
8.63
—
—

$10.31

The  weighted-average  price  and  weighted  average  remaining  contractual  life  for  the  outstanding

options are listed below for the dates indicated.

Range of
Exercise
Prices

Number
Outstanding

$6.93-10.99

16,450

December 31, 2017

Weighted Average

Number
Exercisable

16,450

Exercise
Price

$10.31

Remaining
Contractual Life

0.95 years

Intrinsic
Value

$385,000

Range of
Exercise
Prices

Number
Outstanding

$6.93-10.99

49,700

December 31, 2016

Weighted Average

Number
Exercisable

49,700

Exercise
Price

$9.18

Remaining
Contractual Life

1.40 years

Intrinsic
Value

$955,000

Other  Stock-Based  Compensation DNB  maintains  an  Incentive  Equity  and  Deferred  Compensation
Plan. The plan provides that up to 493,101 shares of common stock may be granted, at the discretion of the
Board,  to  individuals  of  DNB.  Shares  already  granted  are  issuable  on  the  earlier  of  three  years  or  four
years after the date of the grant or a change in control of DNB if the recipients are then employed by DNB
(‘‘Vest  Date’’).  For  awards  granted  prior  to  December  2016,  upon  issuance  of  the  shares,  resale  of  the
shares  is  restricted  for  an  additional  one  year,  during  which  the  shares  may  not  be  sold,  pledged  or
otherwise  disposed  of.  Prior  to  the  Vest  Date  and  in  the  event  the  recipient  terminates  association  with
DNB  for  reasons  other  than  death,  disability  or  change  in  control,  the  recipient  forfeits  all  rights  to  the
shares that would otherwise be issued under the grant.

Share awards granted by the plan were recorded at the date of award based on the fair market value
of shares. Awards are being amortized to expense over a three or four-year cliff-vesting period. Restricted
stock awards are non-participating shares.

For  the  twelve-month  periods  ended  December  31,  2017  and  2016,  $559,000  and  $940,000  was

amortized to expense.

115

DNB  issued  3,000  restricted  stock  awards  during  the  first  quarter  of  2016  that  required  the  award
recipient to hold the shares for one additional year after vesting. These awards cliff vest in three years. For
these shares, DNB adopted the Chaffe Model to measure the fair value by applying a 9.1% discount due to
the lack of marketability when these transactions took place. The input assumptions used and resulting fair
values were an expected life of 5 years, volatility of 19.37%, annual rate of quarterly dividends of 1.01%,
and bond equivalent yield of 1.742%. DNB did not use the Chaffe Model on restricted stock awards issued
during the year ended December 31, 2017.

At  December  31,  2017,  approximately  $402,000  in  additional  compensation  will  be  recognized  over
the weighted average remaining service period of approximately 1.50 years. At December 31, 2017, 314,659
shares were reserved for future grants under the plan. There were 24,915 restricted shares that vested in
2017.  The  shares  awarded  from  the  cashless  exercises  resulted  in  an  increase  in  shares  outstanding  of
13,839. There was a cash equivalent of 11,076 shares used to pay all applicable taxes on the transactions.
Stock grant activity is indicated below.

Non-vested stock awards — January 1,  2016

Granted
Forfeited
Vested

Non-vested stock awards — December  31, 2016

Granted
Forfeited
Vested

Non-vested stock awards — December  31, 2017

Shares

77,255
26,240
—
(47,720)

55,775

500
(230)
(24,915)

31,130

Weighted Average
Stock Price

$22.71
27.82
—
22.11

$25.63

34.00
22.92
24.69

$26.53

(15) COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding, such
as guarantees and commitments to extend credit, borrow money or act in a fiduciary capacity, which are
not  reflected  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  Management  does  not  anticipate  any  significant
losses as a result of these commitments.

DNB had outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaling $4.6 million and unfunded loan and lines of
credit commitments totaling $176.6 million at December 31, 2017, of which, $164.9 million were variable
rate  and  $11.6  million  were  fixed  rate.  The  amount  of  reserve  for  unfunded  loan  commitments  at
December 31, 2017 was $348,000. DNB had outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaling $2.8 million and
unfunded  loan  and  lines  of  credit  commitments  totaling  $185.8  million  at  December  31,  2016,  of  which,
$171.2 million were variable rate and $14.6 million were fixed rate. The amount of reserve for unfunded
loan commitments at December 31, 2016  was $345,000.

These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the
amount recognized on the balance sheet. The exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by
the  party  to  the  financial  instrument  for  commitments  to  extend  credit  and  stand-by  letters  of  credit  is
represented by the contractual amount. Management uses the same credit policies in making commitments
and conditional obligations as it does  for on-balance-sheet instruments.

116

Stand-by letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by DNB to guarantee the performance
or repayment of a financial obligation of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued
to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risks involved in issuing letters of credit
are  essentially  the  same  as  those  involved  in  extending  loan  facilities  to  customers.  DNB  holds  various
forms of collateral to support these commitments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of
any  condition  established  in  the  contract.  Commitments  generally  have  fixed  expiration  dates  or  other
termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. DNB evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on
a  case-by-case  basis.  The  amount  of  collateral,  if  any,  obtained  upon  the  extension  of  credit,  usually
consists of real estate, but may include securities, property or other assets.

DNB maintains borrowing arrangements with correspondent banks and the FHLBP, as well as access
to  the  discount  window  at  the  Federal  Reserve  Bank  of  Philadelphia  to  meet  short-term  liquidity  needs.
Through these relationships, DNB has available  credit of  approximately $516.9  million.

Assets  held  by  DNB  First  Wealth  Management  in  a  fiduciary,  custody  or  agency  capacity  at
December 31, 2017 totaled $252.8 million. These assets are not assets of DNB, and are not included in the
consolidated financial statements.

DNB is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation
causes an element of uncertainty, management is of the opinion that the liability, if any, resulting from the
actions, will not have a material effect  on  the accompanying  financial statements.

(16) PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed financial information of DNB  Financial Corporation follows:

Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
(Dollars in thousands)

Assets
Cash
Investment in subsidiary
Other assets

Total  assets

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities

Junior subordinated debentures
Subordinated debt
Other liabilities

Total  liabilities

Stockholders’ equity

Total  liabilities and stockholders’ equity

December  31

2017

2016

$

114
120,530
457

$

1,354
112,150
484

$121,101

$113,988

$ 9,279
9,750
130

19,159

101,942

$

9,279
9,750
119

19,148

94,840

$121,101

$113,988

117

Condensed Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands)

Income:

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiary
Dividends from subsidiary

Total income

Expense:

Interest expense

Total expense

Net income

Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in thousands)

Net income
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Unrealized holding losses on AFS investment securities arising during the

period

Before tax amount
Tax  effect

Accretion of discount on AFS to HTM reclassification
Before tax amount(1)
Tax  effect(2)

Less reclassification for gains on sales of AFS  investment  securities included

in net income
Before tax amount(3)
Tax  effect(2)

Other comprehensive income (loss) — securities

Unrealized actuarial gains (losses) — pension
Before tax amount
Tax  effect

Total other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income

Year Ended
December 31
2016

2017

$8,496
250

8,746

$(3,213)
8,950

5,737

800

800

758

758

$7,946

$ 4,979

Year Ended
December 31
2016
2017

$7,946

$4,979

(117)
40

(77)

8
(3)

5

(9)
3

(6)

(78)

(57)
19

(38)

(56)
19

(37)

9
(3)

6

(410)
139

(271)

(302)

20
(7)

13

(116)

(289)

$7,830

$4,690

(1)

(2)

(3)

Amounts  are included in ‘‘Interest and dividends on investment securities’’ in the consolidated statements of income.

Amounts  are included in ‘‘Income tax expense’’ in the consolidated statements of income.

Amounts  are included in ‘‘Gains on sale of investment securities, net’’ in the consolidated statements of income.

118

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income  to  net cash used in
operating activities:

Equity in income of subsidiary and dividends
Stock based compensation
Dividends to holding company
Net change in other liabilities
Net change in other assets

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Net cash disbursed in connection with acquisition

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Sale of treasury stock
Tax  benefit for restricted stock vesting
Taxes on exercise of stock options
Dividends paid

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at Beginning of  Period

Cash and cash equivalents at End of Period

Year Ended
December  31
2016
2017

$ 7,946

$ 4,979

(8,746)
559
250
11
27

(5,737)
940
8,950
16
(1,397)

47

7,751

— (5,488)

— (5,488)

542
—
(635)
(1,194)

(1,287)

424
188
(701)
(895)

(984)

(1,240)

1,279

1,354

75

$

114

$ 1,354

(17) SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

2017

2016

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest  income
Interest  expense

Net interest income

Provision for credit losses

Non-interest income

Non-interest expense

Income before income taxes

Income tax expense

Net income

PER SHARE  DATA
Basic earnings*
Diluted earnings*
Cash dividends

$10,494 $10,661 $10,989 $11,241
1,593

1,483

1,262

1,382

$6,105
650

$6,180
708

$6,277
760

$10,617
1,206

9,232

9,279

9,506

9,648

5,455

5,472

5,517

325

1,306

6,745

3,468

1,027

585

1,422

7,084

3,032

746

375

1,271

6,990

3,412

1,001

375

1,419

7,202

3,490

2,682

330

2,329

5,418

2,036

480

200

1,387

5,172

1,487

378

$ 2,441 $ 2,286 $ 2,411 $

808

$1,556

$1,109

$

100

1,369

6,704

82

81

1

9,411

100

1,279

7,347

3,243

930

$ 2,313

$

0.57 $
0.57
0.07

0.54 $
0.53
0.07

0.57 $
0.56
0.07

0.19
0.19
0.07

$ 0.55
0.54
0.07

$ 0.39
0.39
0.07

$ 0.00
0.00
0.07

$

0.62
0.62
0.07

*

Earnings per share is computed independently for each period shown. As a result, the sum of the quarters may not equal the
total earnings per share for the year.

119

(18) REGULATORY MATTERS

Under the Federal Reserve’s Regulation H, the Bank may not, without regulatory approval, declare or
pay a dividend to DNB if the total of all dividends declared in a calendar year exceeds the total of (a) the
Bank’s net income for that year and (b) its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years, less
any required transfers to additional paid-in capital or  to  a fund for  the retirement  of  preferred stock.

In July of 2013, the respective U.S. federal banking agencies issued final rules implementing Basel III
and the Dodd-Frank Act capital requirements to be fully phased in on a global basis on January 1, 2019.
The new regulations establish a new tangible common equity capital requirement, increase the minimum
requirement  for  the  current  Tier  1  risk-weighted  asset  (‘‘RWA’’)  ratio,  phase  out  certain  kinds  of
intangibles  treated  as  capital  and  certain  types  of  instruments  and  change  the  risk  weightings  of  certain
assets  used  to  determine  required  capital  ratios.  The  new  common  equity  Tier  1  capital  component
requires capital of the highest quality — predominantly composed of retained earnings and common stock
instruments.  For  community  banks  such  as  DNB  First,  National  Association,  a  common  equity  Tier  1
capital  ratio  4.5%  became  effective  on  January  1,  2015.  The  new  capital  rules  also  increased  the  current
minimum  Tier  1  capital  ratio  from  4.0%  to  6.0%  beginning  on  January  1,  2015.  In  addition,  in  order  to
make  capital  distributions  and  pay  discretionary  bonuses  to  executive  officers  without  restriction,  an
institution must also maintain greater than 2.5% in common equity attributable to a capital conservation
buffer to be phased in by 0.625% per year from January 1, 2016 until January 1, 2019. The new rules also
increase  the  risk  weights  for  several  categories  of  assets,  including  an  increase  from  100%  to  150%  for
certain  acquisition,  development  and  construction  loans  and  more  than  90-day  past  due  exposures.  The
new capital rules maintain the general structure of the prompt corrective action rules, but incorporate the
new  common  equity  Tier  1  capital  requirement  and  the  increased  Tier  1  RWA  requirement  into  the
prompt corrective action framework.

The  Bank  will  remain  well  capitalized  under  the  implementation  of  Basel  III,  which  was  effective
January  1,  2015.  In  assessing  a  bank’s  capital  adequacy,  regulators  also  consider  other  factors  such  as
interest rate risk exposure; liquidity, funding and market risks; quality and level of earnings; concentrations
of  credit,  quality  of  loans  and  investments;  risks  of  any  nontraditional  activities;  effectiveness  of  bank
policies; and management’s overall ability  to  monitor and control  risks.

120

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require DNB to maintain
certain minimum amounts and ratios as set forth below. Based on management’s assessment, DNB and the
Bank  meet  all  capital  adequacy  requirements  to  which  they  are  subject.  The  Bank  is  considered  ‘‘Well
Capitalized’’  under  the  regulatory  framework  for  prompt  corrective  action.  To  be  categorized  as  Well
Capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum ratios as set forth below. There are no conditions or events
since  the  most  recent  regulatory  notification  that  management  believes  would  have  changed  the  Bank’s
category. Actual capital amounts and  ratios are presented  in the following table.

(Dollars in thousands)

DNB Financial Corporation
December 31, 2017:

Total risk-based capital
Common equity tier 1 capital
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Tier 1 (leverage) capital

December 31, 2016:

Total risk-based capital
Common equity tier 1 capital
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Tier 1 (leverage) capital

DNB First, N.A.
December 31, 2017:

Total risk-based capital
Common equity tier 1 capital
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Tier 1 (leverage) capital

December 31, 2016:

Total risk-based capital
Common equity tier 1 capital
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Tier 1 (leverage) capital

For Capital
Adequacy
Purposes*
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio

Actual

To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective
Action
Provisions*

$113,400
88,459
97,459
97,459

13.73% $66,083
37,172
10.71
49,562
11.80
42,426
9.19

$105,669
81,201
90,201
90,201

12.50% $67,640
38,048
50,730
42,864

9.60
10.67
8.42

8.00%
4.50
6.00
4.00

8.00%
4.50
6.00
4.00

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

$112,050
105,859
105,859
105,859

13.59% $65,953
37,098
12.84
49,465
12.84
42,378
9.99

8.00% $82,441
53,587
4.50
65,953
6.00
52,972
4.00

$103,094
97,376
97,376
97,376

12.22% $67,511
37,975
11.54
50,633
11.54
42,830
9.09

8.00% $84,388
54,852
4.50
67,511
6.00
53,537
4.00

10.00%
6.50
8.00
5.00

10.00%
6.50
8.00
5.00

* Does not include capital conservation  buffer  of  0.625% for  2016 and 1.250% for 2017.

121

Tel:  215-564-1900
Fax:  215-564-3940
www.bdo.com

Ten Penn Center
1801 Market Street, Suite 1700
Philadelphia, PA 19103

19MAR201815215456

Report of Independent Registered Public  Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
DNB Financial Corporation
Downingtown, Pennsylvania

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition for DNB Financial
Corporation  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  ‘‘Corporation’’)  as  of  December 31,  2017  and 2016,  the  related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows
for  each  of  the  two  years  in  the  period  ended  December 31,  2017  and  the  related  notes  (collectively
referred  to  as  the  ‘‘consolidated  financial  statements’’).  In  our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation and subsidiaries
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board  (United  States)  (‘‘PCAOB’’),  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of
December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued
by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the  Treadway  Commission  (‘‘COSO’’)  and  our  report
dated March 15, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements based on our
audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United  States)  (‘‘PCAOB’’)  and  are  required  to  be  independent  with  respect  to  the  Company  in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We  conducted our audits in accordance with the standards  of  the PCAOB. Those standards require
that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement,  whether  due to error or fraud.

Our  audits  included  performing  procedures  to  assess  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond
to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures  in  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  Our  audits  also  included  evaluating  the  accounting
principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall
presentation  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements.  We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a  reasonable
basis for our opinion.

19MAR201815231879

We  have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2018

BDO  USA,  LLP,  a  Delaware  limited  liability  partnership,  is  the  U.S.  member  of  BDO  International  Limited,  a  UK  company  limited by  guarantee,  and  forms  part  of  the 
international BDO network of independent member firms.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

19MAR201815213857

122

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants  on Accounting  and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

(cid:127) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The  Corporation  carried  out  an  evaluation,  under  the  supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  the
Corporation’s  management,  including  the  Corporation’s  Chief  Executive  Officer,  William  J.  Hieb,  and
Chief Financial Officer, Gerald F. Sopp, of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  such  term  is  defined  in  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)  under  the  Exchange  Act)  as  of
December  31,  2017  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act  Rule  13a-15.  Based  upon  that  evaluation,  the  Chief
Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  concluded  that  the  Corporation’s  disclosure  controls  and
procedures as of December 31, 2017  are  effective.

(cid:127) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth
quarter  of  2017  that  have  materially  affected,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

(cid:127) Design and Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Pursuant to Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, the following is a report of management’s assessment of
the  design  and  effectiveness  of  our  internal  controls  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2017,  and  a
report from our independent registered public accounting firm attesting to the effectiveness of our internal
controls:

Management’s Report on Internal Control  Over Financial Reporting

The Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements
and  notes  included  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  have  been  prepared  in  conformity  with  United
States  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  and  necessarily  include  some  amounts  that  are  based  on
Management’s best estimates and judgments.

The  Corporation’s  Management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  effective  internal
control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes
those  policies  and  procedures  that  pertain  to  the  maintenance  of  records  that  in  reasonable  detail
accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and  dispositions  of  the  assets  of  the  Corporation;  provide
reasonable  assurance  that  the  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to  permit  preparation  of  financial
statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles;  provide  a  reasonable  assurance
that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are only being made in accordance with authorizations
of  Management  and  directors  of  the  Corporation;  and  provide  a  reasonable  assurance  regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Corporation’s assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements. The system of internal control over financial
reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by Management and tested
for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken to correct potential deficiencies as
they are noted.

Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the
possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may
occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary

123

over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance
with respect to financial statement preparation.

The  Corporation’s  management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  internal
control  over  financial  reporting,  as  such  term  is  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rule  13a-15(f).  Management,
including  the  Corporation’s  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  assessed  the
Corporation’s  system  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December  31,  2017,  in  relation  to
the  criteria  for  effective  control  over  financial  reporting  as  described  in  ‘‘Internal  Control  —  Integrated
Framework,’’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013).
Based on this assessment, Management concludes that, as of December 31, 2017, the Corporation’s system
of internal control over financial reporting  is effective.

BDO USA, LLP, which is the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial
statements  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2017  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K,  has  issued  an
attestation report on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which can be found under
the heading ‘‘Report of Independent  Registered  Public  Accounting Firm’’, and is  included herein.

124

Tel:  215-564-1900
Fax:  215-564-3940
www.bdo.com

Ten Penn Center
1801 Market Street, Suite 1700
Philadelphia, PA 19103

19MAR201815215456

Report of Independent Registered Public  Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
DNB Financial Corporation
Downingtown, Pennsylvania

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial  Reporting

We  have  audited  DNB  Financial  Corporation  and  its  subsidiaries  (the  ‘‘Corporation’s’’)  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  as  of  December 31,  2017,  based  on  criteria  established  in  Internal
Control — Integrated  Framework  (2013)  issued  by  the  Committee  of  Sponsoring  Organizations  of  the
Treadway Commission (the ‘‘COSO criteria’’). In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO
criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (‘‘PCAOB’’), the consolidated statements of financial condition of the Corporation
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2017,  and  the  related  notes  and  our  report  dated  March 15,  2018  expressed  an  unqualified  opinion
thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in
the  accompanying  Item 9A,  Management’s  Report  on  Internal  Control  over  Financial  Reporting’’.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based
on  our  audit.  We  are  a  public  accounting  firm  registered  with  the  PCAOB  and  are  required  to  be
independent  with  respect  to  the  Corporation  in  accordance  with  U.S.  federal  securities  laws  and  the
applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and  the  PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards
of  the  PCAOB.  Those  standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects.  Our  audit  included  obtaining  an  understanding  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,
assessing  the  risk  that  a  material  weakness  exists,  and  testing  and  evaluating  the  design  and  operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures  as  we  considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  We  believe  that  our  audit  provides  a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal  Control over Financial Reporting

A  company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  is  a  process  designed  to  provide  reasonable
assurance  regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for
external  purposes  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles.  A  company’s  internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance

BDO  USA,  LLP,  a  Delaware  limited  liability  partnership,  is  the  U.S.  member  of  BDO  International  Limited,  a  UK  company  limited by  guarantee,  and  forms  part  of  the 
international BDO network of independent member firms.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

19MAR201815213857

125

19MAR201815221100

of  records  that,  in  reasonable  detail,  accurately  and  fairly  reflect  the  transactions  and  dispositions  of  the
assets  of  the  company;  (2) provide  reasonable  assurance  that  transactions  are  recorded  as  necessary  to
permit  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

19MAR201815231879

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2018

126

Item 9B.

Other Information

None

127

Item 10.

Directors and Executive  Officers of the Registrant

Part III

The information required for Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the sections titles ‘‘Information
About our Directors,’’ ‘‘Corporate Governance,’’ ‘‘Audit Committee Report’’ and ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance’’ in the  2018 Proxy Statement.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The  information  required  for  Item  11  is  incorporated  by  reference  to  the  sections  titled  ‘‘Director
Compensation,’’  ‘‘Compensation  Discussion  and  Analysis,’’  ‘‘Executive  Compensation,’’  and  ‘‘Benefits  &
Compensation Committee Report’’ in the  2018 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners  and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

(a) Information Regarding Equity Compensation  Plans

The following table summarizes certain information relating to equity compensation plans maintained

by DNB  as of December 31, 2017:

Plan category

Equity compensation plans approved  by

security holders:
1995 Stock Option Plan
2004 Incentive  Equity  and  Deferred

Compensation Plan

Equity compensation plans not approved by

security holders

Total

Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Weighted-
average price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available
for  future issuance
under  equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in first column)

16,450

31,130

—

47,580

$10.31

26.53

—

$20.92

354,090

314,659

—

668,749

(b) The  balance  of  the  information  required  is  incorporated  by  reference  to  the  section  titled
‘‘Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and  Management’’  and  ‘‘Equity  Compensation  Plan
Information’’ in the 2018 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence

The information required for Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the sections titled ‘‘Transactions
with  Related  Persons’’  and  ‘‘Corporate  Governance  —  Director  Independence’’  in  the  2018  Proxy
Statement.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees  and Services

The information required for Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the section titled ‘‘Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees’’  in the  2018 Proxy Statement.

128

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements.

Part IV

The consolidated financial statements listed below, the report thereon, and the notes thereto, are set
forth beginning at page 48 of this report under Item 8, ‘‘Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.’’

Reports of Independent Registered Public  Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Financial  Condition
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Change in  Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a)(2) Not applicable

(a)(3) Exhibits, pursuant to Item 601  of Regulation S-K.

Page

122
62
63
64
65
66
67

The  exhibits  listed  on  the  Index  to  Exhibits  are  incorporated  by  reference  and  filed  or  furnished

herewith in response to this Item.

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary.

None

129

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit No.
Under Item 601
of Regulation S-K

2

3

4

10

(i)

(i)

(ii)

(a)

(b)

Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger  by  and  between  DNB  Financial  Corporation  and
East  River  Bank,  dated  as  of  April  4,  2016,  filed  as  Exhibit  2.1  to  Form  8-K  on
April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

Amended  and  Restated  Articles  of  Incorporation,  as  amended  effective  June  30,
2017,  filed  as  Exhibit  3.1  to  Form  8-K  on  July  3,  2017  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

Bylaws  of  the  Registrant  as  amended  January  27,  2016,  filed  as  Exhibit  3.1  to
Form 8-K on January 29, 2016 and incorporated herein  by reference.

Registrant  has  certain  debt  obligations  outstanding,  for  none  of  which  do  the
instruments  defining  holders  rights  authorize  an  amount  of  securities  in  excess  of
10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Registrant  agrees  to  furnish  copies  of  such  agreements  to  the  Commission  on
request.

Subordinated  Note,  by  and  between  DNB  Financial  Corporation  and  Jersey  Shore
State Bank, dated as of March 5, 2015, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K on March 5,
2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

(a)* Amended  and  Restated  Change  of  Control  Agreements  dated  December  20,  2006
between  DNB  Financial  Corporation  and  DNB  First,  N.A.  and  the  following
executive  officers,  each  in  the  form  filed  March  26,  2007  as  Exhibit  10(a)  to
Form 10-K for the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference: Bruce E. Moroney and C.  Tomlinson Kline III.

(b)** 1995  Stock  Option  Plan  of  DNB  Financial  Corporation  (as  amended  and  restated,
effective as of April 25, 2012), filed on March 22, 2012 as Appendix A to Registrant’s
Proxy  Statement  for  its  Annual  Meeting  of  Shareholders  held  April  25,  2012  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(c)** DNB Financial Corporation Incentive Equity and Deferred Compensation Plan (As
Amended  and  Restated  Effective  April  26,  2017),  filed  March  27,  2017  as
Appendix A to Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders
held April 26, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.

130

(d)* Agreement  of  Lease  dated  February  10,  2005  between  Headwaters  Associates,  a
Pennsylvania general partnership, as Lessor, and DNB First, National Association as
Lessee  for  a  portion  of  premises  at  2  North  Church  Street,  West  Chester,
Pennsylvania, filed March 10, 2005 as Exhibit 10(l) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended  December  31,  2004  and  incorporated  herein  by  reference,  as  amended  by
Addendum to Agreement of Lease dated as of November 15, 2005, filed March 23,
2006 as Exhibit 10(l) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference, and as further amended by Second Addendum to
Agreement of Lease dated as of May 25, 2006, filed August 14, 2006 as Exhibit 10(l)
to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference, and as further amended by Third Addendum to Agreement of Lease dated
as of June 9, 2010, filed August 13, 2010 as Exhibit 10(f) to Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter  ended  June  30,  2010  and  incorporated  herein  by  reference  and  as  further
amended  by  Fourth  Addendum  to  Agreement  of  Lease  dated  as  of  June  30,  2013,
filed  August  9,  2013  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended
June 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference. This lease was further amended
by the Amended and Restated Agreement of Lease on September 21, 2016, effective
May  1,  2016,  filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  Form  8-K  on  September  23,  2016  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(e)** Form  of  Stock  Option  Agreement  for  grants  prior  to  2005  under  the  Registrant’s
Stock  Option  Plan,  filed  May  11,  2005  as  Exhibit  10(n)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated  herein by reference.

(f)** Form  of  Nonqualified  Stock  Option  Agreement  for  April  18,  2005  and  subsequent
grants  prior  to  April  23,  2010  under  the  Stock  Option  Plan,  filed  May  11,  2005  as
Exhibit  10(o)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(g)* Amended  and  Restated  Change  of  Control  Agreement  among  DNB  Financial
Corporation,  DNB  First,  N.A.  and  William  J.  Hieb,  filed  April  27,  2007  as
Exhibit  10(l)  to  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2006  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(h)** Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for grants on and after December 22,
2005 and prior to April 23, 2010 under the Stock Option Plan, filed March 23, 2006 as
Exhibit  10(s)  to  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2005  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(i)* Deferred Compensation Plan For Directors of DNB Financial Corporation (adopted
effective October 1, 2006), filed November 14, 2006 as Exhibit 10(s) to Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30,  2006 and  incorporated herein by reference.

(j)* DNB  Financial  Corporation  Deferred  Compensation  Plan  (adopted  effective
October  1,  2006),  filed  November  14,  2006  as  Exhibit  10(t)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006  and  incorporated herein  by reference.

(k)* Change of Control Agreements among DNB Financial Corporation, DNB First, N.A.
and Gerald F. Sopp, in the form filed March 26, 2007 as Exhibit 10(q) to Form 10-K
for the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

131

(l)* DNB Financial Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for William S.
Latoff  as  amended  and  restated  effective  April  1,  2007,  filed  May  15,  2007  as
Exhibit  10(r)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March  31,  2007  and
incorporated  herein  by  reference,  as  further  amended  by  Amendment  dated
December  8,  2008,  filed  March  31,  2009  as  Exhibit  3(r)  to  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal
year-ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by  reference.

(m)* DNB Offer Letter to Gerald F. Sopp, dated December 20, 2006, filed March 26, 2007
as  Exhibit  10(u)  to  Form  10-K  for  the  fiscal  year-ended  December  31,  2006  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(n)** Form  of  Restricted  Stock  Award  Agreement  dated  November,  28,  2007,  filed
March 28, 2008 as Exhibit 10(v) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year-ended December 31,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

(o)** Form of Restricted Stock Option Agreement for non-employee directors for awards
made  on  and  after  April  23,  2010  pursuant  to  the  1995  Stock  Option  Plan  of  DNB
Financial Corporation (as amended and restated, effective as of April 27, 2004), filed
August 13, 2010 as Exhibit 10(y) to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(p)** Form of Restricted Stock Option Agreement for employees for awards made on and
after  April  23,  2010  pursuant  to  the  1995  Stock  Option  Plan  of  DNB  Financial
Corporation  (as  amended  and  restated,  effective  as  of  April  27,  2004),  filed
August 13, 2010 as Exhibit 10(z) to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(q)** Form  of  Amendment  effective  April  23,  2010,  to  the  Restricted  Stock  Award
agreements made between James H. Thornton, James J. Koegel, Mildred C. Joyner
and Thomas A. Fillippo, non-employee Directors of the registrant, and the registrant
on  November  28,  2007  and  December  17,  2008,  filed  August  13,  2010  as
Exhibit  10(aa)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June  30,  2010  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(r)** Form  of  Amendment  effective  April  23,  2010,  to  the  Restricted  Stock  Award
agreements made between William J. Hieb, Gerald F. Sopp and Bruce E. Moroney,
officers of the registrant, and the registrant on November 28, 2007 and December 17,
2008,  filed  August  13,  2010  as  Exhibit  10(cc)  to  Form  10-Q  for  the  fiscal  quarter
ended June 30, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

(s)* Form  of  Amendment  to  Change  of  Control  Agreement  For  Named  Executive
Officers,  filed  as  Exhibit  99.1  to  Form  8-K  on  October  28,  2011  and  incorporated
herein by reference.

(t)** Form  of  Restricted  Stock  Award  Agreement  for  Directors,  filed  as  Exhibit  99.1  to

Form 8-K on December 21, 2012 and incorporated herein by  reference.

(u)** Form  of  Restricted  Stock  Award  Agreement  for  employees,  filed  as  Exhibit  99.2  to

Form 8-K on December 21, 2012 and incorporated herein by  reference.

(v)* Amended Change of Control Agreement among DNB Financial Corporation, DNB
First, N.A. and Gerald F. Sopp, filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K on December 21,
2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

(w)* Change of Control Agreement among DNB Financial Corporation, DNB First, N.A.
and Vincent Liuzzi, filed August 11, 2014 as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

132

(x)

Subordinated  Note  Purchase  Agreement,  by  and  between  DNB  Financial
Corporation  and  Jersey  Shore  State  Bank,  dated  as  of  March  5,  2015,  filed  as
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K on March 5,  2015 and  incorporated herein by reference.

(y)* Employment Agreement between DNB First, N.A. and Christopher P. McGill, dated
April 4, 2016, filed June 24, 2016 as Exhibit 10.2 to Form S-4 and incorporated herein
by reference.

(z)* Employment Agreement between DNB First, N.A. and Jerry Cotlov, dated April 4,
2016,  filed  June  24,  2016  as  Exhibit  10.3  to  Form  S-4  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

(aa)* Amendment  to  Change  of  Control  Agreement  for  William  J.  Hieb,  filed  as
Exhibit  10.1  to  Form  8-K  on  November  17,  2017  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

(bb)**Amendment  to  Restricted  Stock  Award  Agreements  for  William  J.  Hieb,  filed  as
Exhibit  10.2  to  Form  8-K  on  November  17,  2017  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

(cc)* Amendment  to  Change  of  Control  Agreement  for  Gerald  F.  Sopp,  filed  as
Exhibit  10.3  to  Form  8-K  on  November  17,  2017  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

(dd)**Amendment  to  Restricted  Stock  Award  Agreements  for  Gerald  F.  Sopp,  filed  as
Exhibit  10.4  to  Form  8-K  on  November  17,  2017  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference.

(ee)* DNB Financial Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for William J.
Hieb, filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K on October 30, 2017 and incorporated herein
by reference.

(ff)* DNB Financial Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Gerald F.
Sopp, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K on October 30, 2017 and incorporated herein
by reference.

Code  of  Ethics  as  amended  and  restated  effective  October  25,  2017,  filed  herewith.

List of Subsidiaries, filed herewith.

Consent of BDO USA, LLP,  filed herewith.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14  (a)  Certification of Chief  Executive  Officer, filed herewith.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14  (a)  Certification of Chief  Financial Officer, filed herewith.

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer, filed herewith.

Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer,  filed  herewith.

XBRL Instance Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label  Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase  Document

14

21

23

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

101.INS

101.SCH

101.CAL

101.LAB

101.PRE

101.DEF

* Management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.

** Stockholder approved compensatory plan pursuant to which DNB’s Common Stock may be issued to

employees of DNB

133

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  Section  13  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  the
Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed  on  its  behalf  by  the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.

SIGNATURES

March 15, 2018

DNB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

BY: /s/ William J. Hieb

William J. Hieb, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  this  Report  has  been  signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ James H. Thornton

James H. Thornton, Chairman of the
Board

/s/ William J. Hieb

William J. Hieb, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)

/s/ Gerald F. Sopp

Gerald F. Sopp,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Accounting
Officer)

/s/ John F. McGill, Jr.

John F. McGill, Jr.,
Vice Chairman of the Board

/s/ Peter R. Barsz

Peter R. Barsz,
Director

/s/ James R. Biery

James R. Biery,
Director

/s/ Thomas A. Fillippo

Thomas A. Fillippo,
Director

134

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

/s/ Gerard F. Griesser

Gerard F. Griesser,
Director

/s/ Mildred C. Joyner

Mildred C. Joyner,
Director

/s/ Mary D. Latoff

Mary D. Latoff,
Director

/s/ Charles A. Murray

Charles A. Murray,
Director

/s/ G. Daniel O’Donnell

G. Daniel O’Donnell,
Director

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

March 15, 2018

135

DNB Financial Corporation

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

DIRECTORS

4 Brandywine Avenue
Downingtown, PA 19335
Tel. 610-269-1040 Fax 484-359-3176
www.dnbfirst.com

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Investors, brokers, security analysts and 
others desiring financial information should 
contact Gerald F. Sopp at 484-359-3138 or 
gsopp@dnbfirst.com

James H. Thornton, Chairman
John “Jef” McGill, Vice Chairman
Peter R. Barsz
James R. Biery
Thomas A. Fillippo, Sr.
Gerard F. Griesser
William J. Hieb
Mildred C. Joyner
Mary D. Latoff
Daniel O’Donnell
Charles A. Murray

DIRECTORS EMERITUS

Vernon J. Jameson
Eli Silberman
Henry F. Thorne

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

William J. Hieb
President and CEO

Vince Liuzzi
Executive Vice President
Chief Banking Officer

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

BDO USA, LLP
Ten Penn Center, 1801 Market Street
Suite 1700
Philadelphia, PA 19103

COUNSEL

Stradley, Ronon, Stevens and Young, LLP
2600 One Commerce Square
Philadelphia, PA 19103

STOCK LISTING

DNB Financial Corporation shares are  
traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under 
the symbol DNBF

REGISTRAR AND STOCK TRANSFER AGENT

Computershare Shareholder Services
211 Quality Circle, Suite 210
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842-3170
800-368-5948
www-us.computershare.com/investor

MARKET MAKERS

Boenning & Scattergood, Inc.
800-842-8928

FIG Partners 
866-344-2657

Raymond James Financial, Inc.
800-800-4693

John E. McGovern, CPA, MST
President/Founder, John E. McGovern & 
Associates, PC

Margarita Q. Mirkil
Managing Director, Fairmont Ventures

Bill O’Brien
Executive Director, Business Leadership 
Organized for Catholic Schools

A. Joseph Rubino
General Partner, Rubino Holdings LP

Charles E. Swope, Jr.
Chairman, Swope Lees Commercial Real 
Estate, LLC

Joan D. Walsh
Co-Owner, Kashbox Consulting

George C. Zumbano, Esq.
Partner, Lamb McErlane, PC

DNB FIRST WEALTH MANAGEMENT 
ADVISORY BOARD

Richard C. Weber, Board Chair
Managing Director, DNB First Wealth 
Management

Christopher P. McGill
Executive Vice President
Chief Commercial Lending Officer

Gerald F. Sopp
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer & Secretary

DNB FIRST BANK ADVISORY BOARD

Eli Silberman, Board Chair
President, TSG, Inc.

Robert A. Cohen, CPA, Esq.
Shareholder, Riley Riper
Hollin & Colagreco

Jay G. Fischer, Esq.
Partner, Valocchi & Fischer

Frank Hayes, Esq.
Partner, Hayes & Romero

Suzanne R. Jackson, CPA
Owner, SR Jackson, LLC

Joseph E. Brion, Esq.
Chairman, Buckley, Brion, McGuire & Morris LLP

Jerry L. Johnson, Esq.
Attorney at Law

Jeffrey P. Brown, CIC
Partner, KMRD Partners, Inc.

Salvatore M. DeBunda, Esq.
Partner, Archer & Greiner, PC

Joseph J. DellaVecchia, III
President, DellaVecchia, Reilly, Smith and 
Boyd Funeral Home

Vincent T. Donohue, Esq.
Shareholder, Lamb McErlane PC

Christopher M. Fiorentino, PhD
President, West Chester University

Charles A. Hackett, CPA
President, Bliss & Co., Ltd.

Rosaria Hawkins, PhD
President, Take Charge Consultants, Inc.

Donald B. Lynn, Jr., Esq.
Partner, Larmore Scarlett, LLP

Stacey Willits McConnell, Esq.
Partner, Lamb McErlane, PC

John McKenna, Esq.
Shareholder/Director, MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

Anthony Morris, Esq.
Partner, Buckley, Brion, McGuire & Morris LLP

Stephen J. Olsen, Esq.
Partner, Gawthrop Greenwood, PC

Robert S. Supplee, Esq.
Robert S. Supplee, PC

DNB First Branch Locations 

BOOTHWYN
3915 Chichester Avenue
Boothwyn, PA 19061

CALN
1835 East Lincoln Highway
Coatesville, PA 19320

CHADDS FORD
300 Oakland Road
West Chester, PA 19382

DOWNINGTOWN/EAST END
701 East Lancaster Avenue
Downingtown, PA 19335

DOWNINGTOWN/MAIN
4 Brandywine Avenue
Downingtown, PA 19335

EAST FALLS
4341 Ridge Avenue 
Philadelphia, PA 19129

EXTON
410 Exton Square Parkway
Exton, PA 19341

KENNETT SQUARE
215 East Cypress Street
Kennett Square, PA 19348

LIONVILLE
891 North Pottstown Pike
Exton, PA 19341

LITTLE WASHINGTON
104 Culbertson Run Road
Downingtown, PA 19335

LUDWIG’S CORNER
1030 North Pottstown Pike
Chester Springs, PA 19425

OLD CITY
36 North 3rd Street 
Philadelphia, PA 19106

ROXBOROUGH
6137 Ridge Avenue 
Philadelphia, PA 19128

WEST CHESTER
2 North Church Street
West Chester, PA 19380

WEST GOSHEN
1115 West Chester Pike
West Chester, PA 19380