Quarterlytics / Industrials / Paper, Lumber & Forest Products / Interfor

Interfor

ifp · TSX Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker ifp
Exchange TSX
Sector Industrials
Industry Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2010 Annual Report · Interfor
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2010 

Annual Report 

Includes: 

•  Financial Highlights 2010 

•  Message to Shareholders 

•  Management Discussion and Analysis Dated February 9, 2011 

•  Consolidated Financial Statements 

•  Annual Information Form Dated February 9, 2011 

International Forest Products Limited 

® 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2 

International Forest Products Limited 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

2010 

2009 
(in millions of dollars, 
except share and per share amounts) 

2008 

Financial Summary 
Sales 
EBITDA (1) 
Net earnings (loss) 

Per Share Data 
Net earnings (loss) per common share  
         -  basic 
         -  diluted 
Price range per share 
  $ High 
  $ Low 
Book value per share 
Cash Flow per share before working capital change 
Weighted average shares outstanding (millions) 

Financial Position 
Total assets 
Total debt (2)  
Total shareholders’ equity 
Invested capital (1) 

625.6 
53.1 
(3.9) 

(0.08) 
(0.08) 

6.25 
3.21 
7.33 
0.68 
47.1 

611.9 
156.0 
347.3 
519.0 

389.8 
  16.6 
  (23.9) 

437.2 
13.7 
  (55.4) 

(0.51) 
(0.51) 

5.00 
1.24 
7.60 
(0.46) 
47.1 

582.5 
144.5 
358.0 
505.6 

(1.18) 
(1.18) 

6.19 
1.20 
8.62 
0.28 
47.1 

665.3 
168.0 
406.2 
577.9 

Financial Ratios (%) 
Return on average shareholders’ equity (1) 
Return on average invested capital, adjusted (1) 
Net debt as a % of invested capital, adjusted (1)  

(1.1%) 
0.5% 
29.7% 

  (6.3%) 
  (3.4%) 
  28.2% 

 (13.3%) 
 (10.3%) 
 29.2% 

Notes: 

1.  See Glossary for definition. 
2.  Total debt, excluding short-term advances from the Seaboard partnership (2010 - $15.7m, 2009 - $3.1m, 2008 – 

$3.7m)  

“Business conditions in 2010 were much better than those in 2009.  Interfor took advantage of 
the opportunities presented to increase operating rates and to move forward with a number of 
initiatives which we believe will serve the Company well in the years ahead.” 

Message to Shareholders – March 2011 

For further highlights, please see the Message to Shareholders and Management’s 
Discussion and Analysis on the following pages. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS 

3 

OVERVIEW 

Business  conditions  in  2010  were  much  better  than  those  in  2009.    Interfor  took  advantage  of  the 
opportunities  presented  to  increase  operating  rates  and  to  move  forward  with  a  number  of  initiatives 
which we believe will serve the Company well in the years ahead. 

Highlights for the year included: 

•  Production was up almost 70% versus 2009; 

•  The Company’s financial results were much improved; 

•  The Adams Lake sawmill ran well in excess of rated capacity and delivered outstanding 

results; 

•  The  Castlegar  sawmill  was  re-commissioned  in  July  and  set  new  standards  for 

productivity and costs; 

•  Sales to China continued to ramp up;  

•  The Weyerhaeuser timber deal was finalized; and 

•  Our financing agreements were renewed and extended in January and again in August. 

These steps, along with others taken in recent years, have added to Interfor’s position in the industry and 
will make the company much stronger and profitable as markets recover. 

I invite you to review the material covered in the next few pages and later in this report and to form your 
own  views  on  our  progress.    Please  feel  free  to  forward  any  comments  you  would  like  to  make  to  me 
directly at duncan.davies@interfor.com. 

INCREASED  PRODUCTION  AND  HIGHER  COMMODITY  PRICES  CONTRIBUTE  TO  IMPROVED 
FINANCIAL RESULTS 

Interfor took advantage of its strong market position to increase production by almost 70% in 2010. 

The  Company’s  performance  in  this  area  was  well  ahead  of  the  industry’s  results  overall.    In  Canada, 
production was up 13% year-over-year while the U.S. recorded an increase of 5% versus 2009. 

Interfor increased production in each of its operating regions in 2010, most notably in the  B.C. Interior 
which benefitted from a full year of production at Adams Lake and Grand Forks and from the resumption 
of activity at Castlegar in mid-year.  For the year, Interfor produced 1.1 billion  board feet compared to 
660 million board feet in 2009. 

By the 4th quarter, Interfor was operating at an annualized rate of 1.2 billion board feet, representing a 
capacity utilization rate of about 75%. 

The  opportunity  to  increase  production  resulted  from  a  number  of  factors  including  the  strong 
competitive  position  of  our  operations  and  from  the  growth  of  demand  from  outside  North  America, 
particularly China. 

Product prices responded accordingly in 2010.  The Random Lengths’ Composite Index, which measures 
pricing levels for a basket of products, increased from US$222 in 2009 to US$284 in 2010.  More to the 
point  for  West  Coast  producers,  the  commodity  benchmark  SPF  2x4  was  up  41%  in  2010  and  Hem-Fir 
studs were up 33% versus 2009. 

These price increases helped to offset the impact of the stronger C$ which averaged US$0.971 in 2010 
versus US$0.876 in 2009. 

 
 
 
 
4 

Not  all  product  lines  benefitted  to  the  same  extent  as  the  key  commodity  items.    Cedar  --  which  is 
normally an important contributor to our results -- saw prices continue to drop after falling 20-30% last 
year and the price of our key Japanese products were for all intents and purposes flat in 2010.  

All  together,  the  combination  of  higher  production  levels  and  stronger  commodity  prices  contributed  to 
significantly better financial results in 2010 versus 2009.  All-in, Interfor recorded a net loss (before one-
time items) of $3.1 million or $0.07 per share last year on sales of $626 million compared with a loss of 
$33.7 million or $0.72 per share in 2009 on sales of $390 million.  EBITDA, adjusted to exclude one-time 
items, improved by $54.4 million year-over-year to $48.0 million.   

Including a gain on the sale of certain assets and other one-time items, the Company’s net loss in 2010 
was $3.9 million or $0.08 per share. 

ADAMS LAKE DELIVERS OUTSTANDING RESULTS 

The  Adams  Lake  sawmill,  which  commenced  full  operations  in  April  2009,  continued  to  perform  well 
above rated capacity in 2010 and delivered outstanding results. 

The  mill  produced  339  million  board  feet  in  2010,  almost  10%  above  2009  rated  capacity,  and  almost 
20% above the mill’s original proforma, operating on a two shift basis. 

And, despite lumber prices that are well below those expected when the decision to rebuild the mill was 
made, Adams Lake continues to generate returns very consistent with those anticipated. 

We are delighted with the performance of Adams Lake and believe that the ability to design and execute 
on  major  capital  projects  is  one  of  the  competitive  attributes  that  distinguishes  Interfor  from  many 
companies in the industry. 

We  are  currently  looking  at  a  number  of  small  discretionary  projects  for  Adams  Lake  which  will  further 
enhance  the  mill’s  competitive  position.    A  secondary  stacker  was  added  late  in  the  year  and  an 
automated grading system is on the drawing board for the 2nd quarter of 2011.  

CASTLEGAR RE-COMMISSIONED 

Another significant achievement in 2010 was the re-commissioning of the Castlegar sawmill in July. 

The Castlegar mill was acquired from Pope & Talbot, Inc. in April 2008 along with another mill in the B.C. 
Southern Interior at Grand Forks.  Both mills were high cost operations at the time of acquisition. 

The  Grand  Forks  mill  resumed  operations  in  late  2009  and  has  made  a  significant  contribution  to  the 
Company ever since. 

However, as I reported to you last year, the situation at Castlegar was somewhat more difficult. 

I can now report that a significant breakthrough was achieved at Castlegar in 2010. 

A  number  of  changes  were  made  to  the  operating  regime  at  the  mill  which  in  turn  has  contributed  to 
dramatically improved levels of productivity and costs. 

The credit for these changes is due fully to the local management and crew who took control of their own 
destiny by finding new and constructive ways to work together.  Other local stakeholders also contributed 
to the new spirit of cooperation at Castlegar. 

So far, the results at Castlegar have been very encouraging.  The mill has made a solid  contribution to 
our financial results since resuming operations and there is potential for further gains. 

Looking back now, we feel very comfortable that the business opportunity we identified when the Grand 
Forks and Castlegar mills were acquired is real.  If anything, the opportunity may be even better than we 
anticipated. 

We’re currently looking at a number of discretionary investments in the area, including a major upgrade 
to the Grand  Forks sawmill, possibly in conjunction with a power plant that would utilize sawmill waste 
and other forms of biomass, that could be very attractive long-term. 

We hope to be in a position to announce our plans for the Grand Forks/Castlegar region in the next few 
months. 

 
5 

SALES TO CHINA CONTINUE TO RAMP UP 

Interfor has been working actively for a number of years to make in-roads into China.  These efforts bore 
fruit  in  2010  as  shipments  to  that  market  almost  quadrupled  last  year  to  more  than  220  million  board 
feet. 

By  the  4th  quarter,  sales  to  China  had  increased  to  the  point  where  they  represented  a  full  28%  of 
Interfor’s total shipments.  And, significantly, more than 36% of our shipments to China in the 4th quarter 
came from our U.S. operations. 

For the year, shipments to China accounted for 20% of Interfor’s total sales compared to about 10% in 
2009. 

We  continue  to  believe  the  Chinese  market  holds  tremendous  potential.    The  efforts  of  the  B.C.  and 
Canadian  governments  and  by  the  industry  to  promote  North  American  construction  technology  and 
products fits well with China’s rapidly growing housing requirements.    

We  remain  committed  to  working  with  our  industry  counterparts  and  with  the  B.C.  and  Canadian 
governments to develop the Chinese market and to growing our volumes to that market significantly in 
the years ahead. 

TIMBER PURCHASE FINALIZED 

In  mid-March  last  year  we  finalized  the  purchase  of  a  timber  tenure  in  the  Kamloops  region  from 
Weyerhaeuser Company Limited.   

The tenure, which currently provides for an allowable cut of approximately 275,000 m3, strengthens the 
long-term  fibre  supply  for  Adams  Lake  and  helps  to  offset  the  potential  impacts  in  future  supply  as  a 
result of the Mountain Pine Beetle infestation which is impacting timber supply in the B.C. Interior. 

FINANCING AGREEMENTS EXTENDED; BALANCE SHEET REMAINS STRONG 

Interfor renewed and extended its credit lines twice in 2010.  In January, the Company’s operating and 
term  lines  were  extended  to  February  2011  and  February  2012  respectively.    In  August,  the  two  lines 
were  extended  once  again,  this  time  to  July  2012  and  July  2013,  with  all  other  terms  and  conditions 
remaining substantially the same except for a reduction in pricing. 

At year-end, net debt amounted to $147 million or 30% of invested capital. 

With  the  credit  lines  we  have  in  place  and  our  strong  balance  sheet,  Interfor  is  well-positioned  to 
withstand any future issue or disruptions which may arise as markets recover. 

MARKETING GROUPS REORGANIZED; NEW “LOOK” DEVELOPED 

In December, we announced the amalgamation of our Cedar and Whitewood Marketing Groups into one 
entity  under  the  direction  of  Steven  Hofer,  who  was  subsequently  appointed  Vice-President,  Sales  & 
Marketing. 

The reorganization of our sales groups is a key element of our plan to fully leverage our size and product 
line capabilities in the marketplace. 

In  addition,  in  2011,  we  will  be  adopting  a  new,  modern  identity  under  a  redesigned  Interfor  brand 
replacing the existing Interfor, Adams Lake, Interfor Pacific and Cedarprime labels. 

We are excited about the new “look” and look forward to using it to build the Company’s presence in the 
marketplace and to support future growth.   

 
6 

CHALLENGES REMAIN; FOCUS REMAINS INTACT 

While business conditions are better than a year ago, we are not out of the woods yet.  The U.S. housing 
market has been slow to recover, the Cedar business is struggling, and log markets in the U.S. are under 
pressure. 

In  the  face  of  these  challenges  we  intend  to  maintain  the  same  disciplined  approach  to  managing  our 
business that has served us well over the last number of years. 

We will focus on those items that will help position Interfor to deliver above average returns on capital 
invested as markets renew. 

We remain convinced we are on the right track and look forward to making good progress in 2011.  

Thank you for your patience and support. 

Duncan K. Davies 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
March 3, 2011 

 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 

Dated as of February 9, 2011 

7 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides a review of Interfor’s financial performance for the year 
ended December 31, 2010 relative to 2009, the Company’s financial condition and future prospects.  The MD&A should 
be  read  in  conjunction  with  Interfor’s  Annual  Information  Form  and  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  for  the  years 
ended  December  31,  2010  and  2009  filed  on  SEDAR  at  www.sedar.com.    The  financial  information  contained  in  this 
MD&A  has  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  Canadian  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“GAAP”).    In  this 
MD&A,  reference  is  made  to  EBITDA  and  Adjusted  EBITDA.  EBITDA  represents  earnings  before  interest,  taxes, 
depletion,  amortization,  restructuring  costs,  other  foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses,  and  write-downs  of  plant  and 
equipment (“asset write-downs”).  Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for other income (expense) and other 
income  of  the  investee  company.  The  Company  discloses  EBITDA  as  it  is  a  measure  used  by  analysts  and  Interfor’s 
management to evaluate the Company's performance.  As EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure, it may not be comparable to 
EBITDA calculated by others.  In addition, as EBITDA is not a substitute for net earnings, readers should consider net 
earnings in evaluating the Company's performance. 

Unless otherwise noted, all financial references in this MD&A are in Canadian dollars. 

References in this MD&A to “Interfor” and the “Company” mean International Forest Products Limited, together with 
its subsidiaries. 

FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION  

This  report  contains  forward-looking  statements.    Forward-looking  statements  are  statements  that address 
or  discuss  activities,  events  or  developments  that  the  Company  expects  or  anticipates  may  occur  in  the 
future.  Forward-looking statements are included in the description of areas which are likely to be impacted 
by  the  description  of  future  cash  flows  and  liquidity  under  the  headings  “Overview  of  2010”,  “Strong 
Financial Position”, “Income Taxes”, “Financing Activities”, “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, and “Summary 
of  Contractual  Obligations”;  changes  in  accounting  policy  under  the  heading  “Future  Accounting  Policy 
Changes”;  and  in  the  description  of  economic  conditions  under  the  heading  “Outlook”.    These  forward-
looking  statements  reflect  management’s  current  expectations  and  beliefs  and  are  based  on  certain 
assumptions including assumptions as to general business and economic conditions in the U.S. and Canada, 
as well as other factors management believes are appropriate in the circumstances including an assessment 
of risks as described under “Risks and Uncertainties”.  Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks 
and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by such statements will 
occur  or,  if  they  do  occur,  what  benefit  the  Company  will  derive  from  them.    A  number  of  factors  could 
cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially  from those expressed or implied by 
such  forward-looking  statements,  including  those  matters  described  in  this  2010  annual  Management’s 
Discussion  and  Analysis  under  “Risks  and  Uncertainties”  and  in  Interfor’s  current  Annual  Information  Form 
available on www.sedar.com.  Accordingly, readers should exercise caution in relying upon forward-looking 
statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise them to reflect subsequent events 
or circumstance, except as required by law. 

OVERVIEW OF 2010 

Interfor’s results for 2010 were dramatically better than 2009.  Growth in export markets, particularly China, 
provided an alternative to U.S. markets adding upward pressure on North American pricing.  This resulted in 
higher sales values and supported increased operating rates. 

Accomplishments in 2010 include: 

• 

• 

the development of lumber and log export markets to take advantage of increasing demand from China;  

increased operating rates,  particularly in the B.C. Interior supported by  increased demand from export 
markets as well as improved demand in North American markets;   

•  marked improvements to the cost structure at the Castlegar sawmill through changes in the operating 

configuration which allowed the mill to restart and contribute to 2010 earnings;  

• 

the acquisition of a timber tenure in the Kamloops region  from  Weyerhaeuser  Company Limited which 
added increased fibre for the Adams Lake sawmill;  

     
 
 
 
 
8 

• 

• 

a return to positive operating earnings in the fourth quarter, 2010 for the first time since 2006; and 

an increase of $16.2 million in positive cash flow from operations, after working capital changes, and an 
improvement of $54.4 million in Adjusted EBITDA over 2009.   

The challenges of 2009 persisted into 2010, but to a lesser degree.  2010 continued to be impacted by slow 
North  American  lumber  demand  as  recovery  in  the  U.S.  housing  market  leveled  off.    Ongoing  high 
unemployment,  foreclosures  and  an  oversupply  of  homes  in  the  U.S.  weighed  on  the  housing  sector,  but 
government  spending  incentives,  a  slight  uptick  in  housing  starts  and  minimal  ending  inventories  in  2009 
caused an increase in demand in the first half of 2010.  The pace of improvement eased mid-year for the 
balance of 2010. 

In an effort to lessen reliance on a sluggish U.S. housing market, the Company shifted its focus to the Asian 
markets  where  demand  for  commodities  is  expected  to  remain  strong.    The  impact  of  an  industry-wide 
redirection of wood products to fast-growing emerging markets, particularly China, has had a dual benefit.  
In addition to finding replacement markets for the lost volume previously consumed by the U.S. the strong 
export  markets  have  caused  a  reduction  in  supply  available  to  the  North  American  market  resulting  in 
improved lumber prices through the final months of 2010. 

A  downside  to  the  Chinese  demand  for  logs  and  lumber  is  that  holders  of  timber  in  the  U.S.  Pacific 
Northwest have expanded their log exports to Chinese sawmills.  Strong export markets have caused sawlog 
prices  in  the  U.S.  Pacific  Northwest  to  increase  for  Interfor’s  U.S.  mills  who  source  their  fibre  through 
purchase and timber sale agreements. 

Results  year-over-year  have  also  been  impacted  by  the  strengthened  Canadian  dollar  which,  relative  to  its 
U.S. counterpart appreciated by almost ten percent on average for 2010 compared to 2009. 

Interfor  continued  to  benefit  from  its  diversified  product  lines  and  markets,  focus  on  effective  cash 
management  and  cost  control,  and  investment  in  core  assets.    The  Company  continues  to  look  for 
opportunities  to  maximize  shareholder  value,  including  acquisition  of  full  control  over  Seaboard  Shipping 
Company Limited (“Seaboard”) to ensure access to timely off-shore transportation and the exploration of the 
biomass energy sector.  A brief overview of the more significant developments in 2010 is presented below. 

Markets and Pricing 

Lumber  

•  Structural Lumber 

The  North  American  lumber  industry  continues  to  be  affected  by  poor  U.S.  housing  starts  and  a  U.S. 
housing  market  that  is  challenged  by  a  supply/demand  imbalance.      Industry-wide  production 
curtailments in place for most of 2009 continued into early 2010 to balance output with demand levels.  
As a result, inventory levels were drawn down significantly, leaving inadequate inventory in the supply 
chain  to  meet  any  increases  in  demand.    Consequently,  when  demand  improved  at  the  start  of  2010 
with  government  spending  incentives,  a  slight  upward  movement  in  U.S.  housing  starts  and  the 
restocking  of  inventories,  production  fell  short  of  consumption.    During  the  same  period  off-shore 
demand increased, particularly from China, putting even more pressure on the demand for product.  The 
lagged ability of producers to ramp up supply resulted in a dramatic and rapid surge in lumber prices in 
the first four months of 2010. 

U.S. prices peaked in April, 2010, but as homebuyer’s tax incentives in the U.S. were withdrawn and as 
output  rose,  production  quickly  outpaced  demand  bringing  the  market  back  into  a  position  of  excess 
supply.  Lumber prices fell sharply, particularly as economic indicators in the U.S. showed signs of slower 
growth.   

In  mid-2010  prices  stabilized  with  production  curtailments  again  providing  a  balance  between 
supply/demand.    Offshore  demand  also  improved  and  production  was  redirected  to  export  markets, 
particularly  those  in  the  Pacific  Rim.    Reliance  on  U.S.  markets  edged  down  as  shipments  to  China 
helped  offset  slower  U.S.  demand  and  influenced  price  increases  in  both  North  American  and  export 
markets.    The  average  US$  price  for  Western  SPF  2x4  #2&Btr  for  2010  was  US$74  per  mfbm  higher 
than 2009 and ended the last week of December 2010 at an average US$308 per mfbm. 

     
 
9 

US HOUSING STARTS 
Units:  Millions

US TOTAL HOME INVENTORY 
Units:  For sale at end of period

1.50

1.00

0.50

0.00

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2008              2009             2010

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2008               2009                2010

5,000

4,500

4,000

3,500

BENCHMARK PRICE TRENDS
Western SPF (2 X 4 #2&Btr)
Units: US$ / Mfbm

350

250

150

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2009                         2010

Source:  Random Lengths, used with permission  

Interfor Shipment Volumes to US and China

US

China

m
b
f
M

150,000 

125,000 

100,000 

75,000 

50,000 

25,000 

-

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

2009                                   2010

•  Cedar 

Demand for cedar products weakened significantly in 2009 due to poor North American demand.  This 
resulted in lower prices on North American product lines which did not recover in 2010.  The year-over-
year  average  price  for  knotty  Western  Red  Cedar  2x6  decreased  by  US$21  per  mfbm  with  a  sharp 
decline from a January 2009 high of $US1,127 per mfbm to US$1,000 per mfbm in June 2009.  Prices 
languished at these levels through 2010. 

BENCHMARK PRICE TRENDS
CEDAR (WRC 2 X 6 RL KD)
Units: US$ / Mfbm

1150

1100

1050

1000

950

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2009            2010

Source:  Random Lengths, used with permission  

     
 
   
  
               
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
• 

Japan 

Continued stable economic conditions and the strength of the Yen relative to the US$ supported prices 
for  the  Company’s  products  in  Japan.    Housing  starts  continued  to  show  improvement  in  2010  but  a 
significant  increase  in  the  global  supply  of  lumber  for  Japan  resulted  in  stagnant  lumber  prices.  
Compared to 2009, the average 2010 price for Hemlock Square 4-1/8”, as reported by Random Lengths, 
was flat at US$775 per mfbm through most of 2009 and 2010. 

10 

BENCHMARK PRICE TRENDS
HEMLOCK (Sq 4-1/8" 13' JP)
Units: US$ / Mfbm

800

775

750

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

2009             2010

Source:  Random Lengths, used with permission  

Logs and Residuals 

Log  sales  revenue  improved  32.0%  compared  to  2009  with  average  prices  attained  in  both  Canadian  and 
export log markets higher by $7 per cubic metre and an improvement of 17.6% in sales volumes over 2009.  
Compared  to  2009,  pulp  chip  and  other  by-product  revenues  for  2010  increased  63.7%  year  over  year  as 
higher sales volumes were available with higher sawmill operating rates, particularly in the B.C. Interior. 

Volatility of the Canadian Dollar 

The  Canadian  dollar  (“CAD$”)  strengthened  steadily  against  the  US$  over  the  final  three  quarters  of  2009 
and through 2010, ending the year at CAD$0.995 per US$1.00, up 5.7% from the end of 2009.  Year-over-
year, the average CAD$ was stronger at $1.030 for 2010 compared to $1.142 in 2009. 

The significance of the volatility of the CAD$ on Canadian lumber producers’ sales realizations is highlighted 
in the following chart, which shows the average US$ price and CAD$ equivalent of a thousand board feet of 
Western SPF 2x4 #2&Btr for the period 2005 through 2010.   

m
b
f
M

/
s
r
a

l
l

o
D

650

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

Impact of CAD$ on Sales Realizations
Western SPF (2 X 4 #2&Btr)
(Source:  Random Lengths and Bank of Canada)

CAD equivalent $/Mfbm

US $/Mfbm

Spot $CAD per US$1.00

US$ / Mfbm

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Monthly Average

$
D
A
C

:
$
S
U
t
o
p
S

1.60 

1.50 

1.40 

1.30 

1.20 

1.10 

1.00 

0.90 

0.80 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Export Tax  

As a result of the Softwood Lumber Agreement (“SLA”) implemented by the federal governments of Canada 
and  the  United  States  on  October  12,  2006,  Canadian  softwood  lumber  exporters  pay  an  export  charge 
when the price of lumber is at or below US$355 per mfbm, as determined by the framing lumber composite 
price (“RLCI”) produced by Random Lengths Publications Incorporated.  The Province of B.C. has the right to 
choose between an export charge only (“Option A”) or a lower export charge with a quota (“Option B”).  The 
Province of B.C. chose Option A for both the B.C. Coast and the B.C. Interior which results in the Company’s 
Canadian lumber exports to the United States being subject to the following taxes: 

11 

      Price (1) 
Over US $355  

US $336 - $355 

US $316 - $335 

US $315 or under 
(1) Based on the prevailing RLCI 

  Export Tax (%) 
Nil 

5 

10 

15 

As a result of higher commodity lumber prices in early 2010, the export tax paid under the SLA declined in 
2010 for the first time since the implementation of the agreement in October 2006, though the decline was 
short-lived.    As  the  prevailing  RLCI  moved  through  the  various  thresholds,  the  Option  A  export  charge 
decreased from 15% to 10% in the month of May 2010 and no export tax was charged on U.S. shipments 
from Canada in June 2010.  Price declines resulted in a 10% export tax in July 2010, and further declines 
resulted in a return to the 15% export tax level for the balance of 2010.   

The Option A export charge was 15% throughout 2009.   

Purchase of Kamloops Timber Tenure 

On March 15, 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of a timber tenure in the Kamloops region from 
Weyerhaeuser Company Limited following an extended period of regulatory review.  The tenure represents 
an  Allowable  Annual  Cut  (“AAC”)  of  approximately  275,000  cubic  metres  and  strengthens  the  Company’s 
long  term  timber  supply  for  the  new  Adams  Lake  sawmill  helping  to  offset  anticipated  declines  in  future 
supply as a result of the Mountain Pine Beetle infestation.   

Softwood Lumber Agreement Arbitration 

On  October  8,  2010,  the  U.S.  Trade  Representative’s  office  filed  a  request  for  consultations  with  Canada 
under  the  terms  of  the  Softwood  Lumber  Agreement  (“SLA”)  over  its  concern  that  the  province  of  British 
Columbia  is  charging  too  low  a  price  for  certain  grades  of  timber  harvested  on  public  lands  in  the  B.C. 
Interior.   

Under the terms of the SLA, consultations between the two governments were held but the matter was not 
resolved and on January 18, 2011 the U.S. Trade Representative filed for arbitration.  The arbitration will be 
conducted  by  the  London  Court  of  International  Arbitration  (“LCIA”).    Decisions  by  the  LCIA  are  final  and 
binding on both parties.  The Company believes that B.C. and Canada are complying with their obligations 
under the SLA.  

While the arbitration process is ongoing, export tax will continue to apply on all shipments of B.C. lumber to 
the U.S. 

As the U.S. arbitration request is still in preliminary stages the existence of any potential claim has not been 
determined and no provision has been recorded in the financial statements as at December 31, 2010. 

Strong Financial Position 

The  Company  maintained  a  strong  financial  position  throughout  2010,  ending  the  year  with  net  debt  of 
$146.7 million or 29.7% of invested capital.  Cash flow from operations, after working capital changes, for 
the year was positive $21.0 million.  In the fourth quarter of 2010, operating earnings returned to positive 
levels  for  the  first  time  in  over  four  years.    Adjusted  EBITDA  at  $48.0  million  improved  considerably  from 
2009. 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12 

On  January  15,  2010  the  Company  amended  and  extended  its  existing  syndicated  credit  facilities.    The 
Company’s Operating Line was extended to February 28, 2011 and the Revolving Term Line increased from 
$150 million to $200 million, and its maturity date was extended to February 28, 2012.  All other terms and 
conditions of the lines remained substantially unchanged.   

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010 the Company drew US$35.0 
million ($35.8 million) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled its U.S. dollar non-revolving term 
line (the “Non-Revolving Term Line”).  

On  August  19,  2010,  the  Company  further  amended  and  extended  its  syndicated  credit  facilities.    The 
maturity date of the Operating Line was extended from February 28, 2011 to July 28, 2012 and the maturity 
date of the Revolving Term Line was extended from February 28, 2012 to July 28, 2013.  All other terms and 
conditions of the lines remain substantially unchanged except for a reduction in pricing. 

At December 31, 2010 the Company had unused available credit and cash of $113.5 million. 

The slow pace of US housing starts continues to colour the near term outlook and despite the shift to Asian 
markets the U.S. continues to be the largest consumer of our products.  The expansion to off-shore markets, 
however,  has  driven  positive  results  with  increased  pricing  in  both  North  American  and  off-shore  markets 
and the Company remains committed to maintaining these customer relationships on a long-term basis.   

Currency  exchange  rates  have  continued  their  volatility  into  2010  and  the  Canadian  dollar  is  expected  to 
remain strong relative to its U.S.  counterpart for the foreseeable future.  Although we continue to balance 
production  against  sales  and  maintain  our  focus  on  cost  containment,  we  are  actively  planning  to  take 
advantage of opportunities and the upturn in North American markets when it comes.   

     
 
REVIEW OF OPERATING RESULTS 

Selected Annual Financial Information 

1

Sales   –Lumber 
           –Logs 
           –Wood chips and other by-products 
           –Other 
Total Sales 
Operating earnings (loss) before U.S. duty refunds, net,    

restructuring costs and asset write-downs 

Operating earnings (loss) 
Net earnings (loss) 
Net earnings (loss) per share – basic 
Net earnings (loss) per share – diluted 
EBITDA5 
Adjusted EBITDA5 
Cash flow from operations per share2 
Shares outstanding  
                                 – weighted average (millions)  
Average foreign exchange rate per US$1.004 
Closing foreign exchange rate per US$1.004 

– end of period (millions)3 

13 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

(millions of dollars except share, per share and  
foreign exchange rate amounts) 
434.5 
297.4 
288.6 
118.6 
103.6 
60.4 
50.2 
30.6 
34.3 
5.6 
6.4 
7.7 
611.0 
437.2 
389.8 

482.0 
79.8 
56.2 
7.7 
625.6 

625.6 
103.2 
41.9 
53.7 
824.4 

(5.4) 

(46.5) 

(33.5) 

(25.1) 

15.4 

(7.0) 
(3.9) 
(0.08) 
(0.08) 
53.1 
48.0 
0.68 
47.4 
47.1 
1.0303 
0.9946 

(50.8) 
(23.9) 
(0.51) 
(0.51) 
16.6 
(6.4) 
(0.46) 
47.1 
47.1 
1.1420 
1.0510 

(68.4) 
(55.4) 
(1.18) 
(1.18) 
13.7 
12.3 
0.28 
47.1 
47.1 

(27.1) 
(13.3) 
(0.28) 
(0.28) 
30.8 
24.8 
0.51 
47.1 
47.6 
1.0660  1.0750 
1.2180  0.9913 

104.7 
96.2 
1.98 
1.96 
185.7 
68.6 
2.95 
48.1 
48.5 
1.1341 
1.1654 

1 
2 
3 

4 
5 

Tables may not add due to rounding. 
Cash generated from (used in) operations before taking account of changes in operating working capital. 
As at February 9, 2011, the numbers of shares outstanding by class are:  Class A Subordinate Voting shares – 46,374,676 Class B 
Common shares – 1,015,779, Total – 47,390,455.   
Rates are based on Bank of Canada closing foreign exchange rates per US$1.00.   
The  Company  discloses  EBITDA  as  it  is  a  measure  used  by  analysts  and  Interfor’s  management  to  evaluate  the  Company's 
performance.    As  EBITDA  is  a  non-GAAP  measure,  it  may  not  be  comparable  to  EBITDA  calculated  by  others.    In  addition,  as 
EBITDA  is  not  a  substitute  for  net  earnings,  readers  should  consider  net  earnings  in  evaluating  the  Company's  performance.  
Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted for net U.S. duty refunds, other income and other income of the investee company.   

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA can be calculated from the statements of operations as follows: 

Net earnings (loss) 
Add: Income taxes (recovery) 
        Net interest (income) expense 

      Interest income on U.S. duty refunds, net of special charge 

        Depletion and amortization  
        Other foreign exchange (gains) losses 
        Restructuring costs, asset write-downs and other 
EBITDA 
Deduct: 
        U.S. duty refunds, net  
        Other income 
        Other income of investee company 
Adjusted EBITDA  

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

(millions of dollars) 

$(3.9) 
(0.5) 
8.5 
- 
47.1 
0.3 
1.6 
53.1 

$(23.9) 
(9.9) 
7.8 
- 
38.2 
- 
4.4 
16.6 

- 
        - 
5.2 
$48.0 

- 
23.0 

         - 

$(6.4) 

$(55.4) 
(11.0) 
5.1 
- 
41.0 
(0.9) 
34.9 
13.7 

- 
1.4 
- 
$12.3 

$(13.3) 
(13.6) 
(1.3) 
- 
49.7 
7.3 
2.0 
30.8 

- 
6.0 
- 
$24.8 

$96.2 
42.5 
3.4 
 (12.7) 
51.0 
(2.3) 
7.6 
185.7 

96.9 
20.2 
- 
$68.6 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Volume and Price Statistics 

(million fbm) 

(million fbm) 

Lumber sales                                       
Lumber production1                               
Log sales2                                               
Log production2                                     
Average selling price – lumber3             
Average selling price – logs2                 
Average selling price – pulp chips       ($/thousand fbm) 

($/thousand fbm) 

($/cubic metre) 

(thousand cubic metres) 

(thousand cubic metres) 

14 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

1,132 
1,110 
1,081 
2,661 
$426 
$67 
$40 

668 
661 
919 
1,295 
$432 
$61 
$40 

503 
498 
1,319 
1,881 
$591 
$74 
$49 

870 
856 
1,223 
1,767 
$499 
$95 
$49 

1,172 
1,165 
1,190 
2,381 
$534 
$86 
$33 

Excludes lumber produced on a custom cutting basis for customers who have previously purchased the logs 

1 
2      B.C. operations  
3      Gross sales before duties and export taxes 

Comparison of Year ended December 31, 2010 to Year ended December 31, 2009 

Interfor recorded a net loss of $3.9 million, or $0.08 per share for 2010, as compared to a net loss of $23.9 
million, or $0.51 per share in 2009.   

Included in 2010 results is an equity income inclusion of $6.1 million for a gain on disposal of capital assets 
by the investee, a valuation charge of $4.1 million against future tax assets, and other one-time items. 

Included  in  2009  results  are  an  after-tax  gain  on  the  sale  of  the  former  Queensboro  sawmill  site  of  $19.0 
million, a valuation charge of $7.4 million against future tax assets, and other one-time items. 

Before  restructuring  costs,  foreign  exchange  gains  (losses),  other  one-time  items  and  a  tax  valuation 
allowance (refer to Income Taxes), the Company’s net loss for 2010 was $3.1 million after-tax, or $0.07 per 
share, as compared to a loss of $33.7 million after-tax, or $0.72 per share in 2009.   

EBITDA  and  Adjusted  EBITDA  for  2010  were  $53.1  million  and  $48.0  million,  respectively,  compared  to 
$16.6 million and negative $6.4 million for 2009.   

Sales  

Total sales revenues were $625.6 million in 2010, an improvement of $235.8 million over 2009.   

Lumber  shipments  improved  by  464  million  board  feet  in  2010  reflecting  the  addition  of  production  from 
Adams Lake, the recommenced operations at Grand Forks and Castlegar sawmills and higher operating rates 
at the Company’s U.S. sawmills.  There continues to be a significant shift in markets as strong growth in the 
China  markets  helps  to  offset  slower  demand  in  the  U.S.    For  2010,  excluding  wholesale  programs, 
shipments  to  the  U.S.  accounted  for  50%  of  total  lumber  shipments,  a  decline  of  10%  over  2009  with 
shipments redirected to China which grew by 11% to 20% of total lumber shipments.   

Unit  lumber  sales  values  declined  by  $6  per  mfbm  resulting  from  the  sizeable  shift  in  sales  mix  towards 
North American structural lumber products and lower value products destined for the Pacific Rim and away 
from  high  value  cedar  and  Japan  products,  particularly  with  the  substantial  volumes  added  by  the  Adams 
Lake sawmill.  The shift in sales mix more than offset the impact of significantly improved North American 
structural lumber product prices on the Company’s average unit sales price.  A stronger Canadian dollar also 
negatively impacted sales values for products priced in $US. 

Log sales increased by $19.3 million or 32.0% in 2010 over 2009 with higher sales values attained in both 
Canadian  and  export  log  markets.    This  was  evidenced  by  improvements  of  $7  per  cubic  metre  in  the 
average overall sales price for logs sold by Canadian divisions in 2010 as fir and pulp values moved up and 
pulp fibre made up a lesser percentage of sales.  In addition, Canadian log sales volumes grew by 162,000 
cubic metres, or 17.6%. 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15 

Compared to 2009, pulp chip and other by-product revenues for 2010 were up $21.9 million, a reflection of 
higher sawmill operating rates.  Overall 2010 average chip prices remained constant as compared to 2009, 
with improvements on the B.C. Coast which are tied to pulp prices offset by a slight decline in the U.S. and 
amplified by the negative impact of the stronger Canadian dollar. 

Operating Costs 

Production costs for 2010 increased $182.6 million, or 48.8% over 2009.  Comparative production volumes 
and  related  costs  for  2009  were  extremely  low  as  a  result  of  significant  market  related  curtailments  in 
manufacturing  and  logging,  and  the  curtailment  of  the  Adams  Lake  sawmill  in  the  first  several  months  of 
2009, during the final stages of its rebuild.  Lumber production increased by 449 million board feet for 2010 
compared to 2009, with most of this increase driven by the B.C. Interior sawmills.  The ramp-up of the new 
Adams Lake sawmill and cost improvements at the Grand Forks and Castlegar sawmills resulted in sizeable 
increases in operating rates over 2009. 

Compared to 2009, B.C. log production grew by 1.4 million cubic metres in 2010.  To match production to 
consumption and reduce inventories, log production had been dramatically curtailed in 2009.  Increased fibre 
consumption resulting  from improved  operating rates in  2010, the acquisition  of additional timber tenures, 
and improved supply/demand balances led to increased log production on the B.C. Coast and particularly in 
the  B.C.  Interior  regions.    Increased  harvesting  through  higher  cost  heli-logging  on  the  B.C.  Coast 
contributed  to  higher  logging  unit  costs  in  2010  as  the  percentage  of  heli-logged  volumes  almost  doubled 
those in 2009 to 22% of total log production on the B.C. Coast. 

Manufacturing unit cash conversion costs declined by 17.6% in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a result 
of the substantial increase in operating rates and improved cost structures in the B.C. Interior sawmills.  For 
U.S. operations costs were further improved by a stronger Canadian dollar.   Sizeable increases in fibre costs 
in  the  U.S.  Pacific  Northwest  sawmills,  however,  served  to  partially  offset  the  benefits  of  improved  cash 
conversion costs as fibre supply remains tight. 

The  export  tax  paid  under  the  SLA  for  2010  increased  by  $3.5  million  or  almost  double  that  of  2009  and 
resulted  from  an  increase  of  135  million  board  feet  in  Canadian  shipments  to  the  U.S.  or  2.7  times  the 
volumes  shipped  in  2009.    2010  export  taxes  were  also  impacted  by  changing  rates  through  2010  as 
commodity lumber prices met certain thresholds during the year and reduced the tax from its maximum of 
15% to a low of zero for the month of June 2010.  Declines in export tax rates were short-lived, however, 
and most shipments attracted a rate of 15%. 

As  the  export  tax  is  based  on  U.S.  dollars,  the  increased  expense  in  2010  was  mitigated  by  the  stronger 
Canadian dollar in comparison to 2009. 

Selling  and  administration  costs  in  2010  increased  by  $1.1  million  as  compared  to  2009,  arising  primarily 
from increased corporate development expenditures.  Long-term incentive compensation (“LTIC”), which is 
impacted  by  the  Company’s  share  price,  the  number  of  grants  made  under  the  various  plans  and  vesting 
periods,  showed  an  expense  of  $1.9  million  in  2010  (2009  -  LTIC  expense  of  $3.2  million)  due  to  the 
Company’s rising share price.   

An  increase  in  amortization  of  plant  and  equipment  of  13.2%  compared  to  2009  resulted  from  higher 
operating rates primarily at the Adams Lake sawmill which did not operate until April 20, 2009 when the new 
sawmill ramped-up.  

Road amortization and depletion expense for 2010 increased $5.7 million or 42.5% compared to 2009 as a 
result of significantly higher logging activity on the B.C. Coast, which had been dramatically curtailed in 2009 
to manage inventory levels, and in the B.C. interior to supply the Adams Lake sawmill. 

Restructuring  costs  and  asset  write-downs  totaled  $1.6  million  in  2010,  compared  to  $4.4  million  in  2009.  
The 2010 charge includes $0.5 million of impairment charges for assets no longer expected to provide future 
benefit compared to $3.1  million in  2009,  and a $1.1 million charge for severance costs compared to $1.6 
million in 2009.  2009 was also partially offset by a $0.3 million accrual reversal. 

     
 
The  following  table  shows  the  components  of  restructuring  costs  and  write-downs  of  plant  and  equipment 
for both years: 

2010 

2009 

16 

Plant and equipment write-downs 
Severance costs 
Other (recovery) 

Interest Expense 

$ 

$ 

(millions of dollars) 
$ 

3.1 
1.6 
(0.3)   
4.4 

$ 

0.5 
1.1 
- 
1.6 

In  2010,  the  Company  recorded  $8.5  million  of  total  interest  expense,  compared  to  $7.8  million  in  2009.  
Average  debt  levels  were unchanged  year-over-year  but  an  overall  increase  in  bank  average  lending  rates 
over  2009  resulted  in  a  higher  effective  interest  rate  than  in  2009.    Also  impacting  interest  expense  to  a 
much lesser extent was the volatility of the Canadian dollar which averaged 1.0303 in 2010 as compared to 
1.1420 in 2009, and a decrease in pricing on the extension of debt facilities in August, 2010. 

Other Foreign Exchange Gain 

Other net foreign exchange gain was $0.3 million in 2010 compared to a net foreign exchange gain of $nil in 
2009, which arose due to the following items.   

Gain (loss) on: 

Revaluation/settlement of forward exchange contracts 
Interest rate swap 
Revaluation and settlement of US$ denominated debt 
Other 

2010 

2009 

(millions of dollars) 

$ 

$ 

(0.1) 
- 
0.1 
0.3 
0.3 

$ 

$ 

(3.6) 
(2.1) 
5.8 
(0.1) 
0.0 

Other Income 

Other  income  was  negligible  in  2010  compared  to  $23.0  million  in  2009.    In  2009,  $21.2  million  arose 
primarily  from  the  sale  of  the  Queensboro  property,  site  of  the  Company’s  former  Queensboro  sawmill 
division that had been permanently closed in July 2008.   

Gain on disposal of surplus property, plant 
and equipment, and investment 

Gain on settlement of timber takeback 
Other 

Equity Income  

2010 

2009 

(millions of dollars) 

$ 

$ 

(0.2) 
0.4 
(0.2) 
- 

$ 

$ 

22.1 
1.0 
(0.1) 
23.0 

The Company recorded equity income of $11.4 million in 2010, an increase of  $9.6 million over 2009.   Of 
this increase, $5.2 million  arose as the Seaboard Partnership (“Seaboard”) disposed of its two  vessels, the 
Skaubryn and Skaugran, during 2010 for a gain of $6.1 million offset by $0.9 million in one-time expenses.  
The gain, coupled with significantly increased equity participation in the earnings of Seaboard due to greater 
shipment volumes by the Company relative to the other partners, dramatically improved equity earnings in 
comparison to 2009.  Concurrent with the sale of the ships, Seaboard has entered into a charter agreement 
which effectively replaces the lumber shipping capacity of the sold vessels.  Seaboard expects to continue to 
operate in a normal fashion. 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 

Income Taxes 

The  Company  recorded  an  income  tax  recovery  of  $0.5  million  for  2010  and  increased  its  valuation 
allowance against certain future income tax assets arising from loss carry-forwards available to reduce future 
taxable  income  by  $4.1  million.    For  2009  the  increase  in  the  valuation  allowance  reduced  the  Company’s 
income  tax  recovery  by  $7.4  million  to  a  net  recovery  of  $9.9  million.    Although  the  Company  expects  to 
realize  the  full  benefit  of  the  loss  carry-forwards,  due  to  the  cyclical  nature  of  the  wood  products  industry 
and the economic conditions over the last several years the Company has provided a valuation allowance in 
respect  of  its  operating  loss  carry-forwards,  net  of  temporary  differences.    The  Company’s  Canadian  non-
capital  loss  carry-forwards  and  U.S.  net  operating  loss  carry-forwards  totaling  approximately  $260  million 
(2009 - $216 million) expire between 2011 and 2030, and are available to reduce future taxable income.   

The overall effective rate of 10.6% for 2010 (2009 – 29.3%) differs significantly from the Canadian statutory 
rate of 28.5% (2009 – 30.0%) mainly due to the valuation allowance of $4.1 million partially offset by non-
taxable income that is accounted for by the equity method. 

Net Loss 

As a result of the above factors, the Company recorded a net loss of $3.9 million, $0.08 per share, for the 
year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a net loss of $23.9 million, $0.51 per share, for the year ended 
December 31, 2009. 

Cash Flows 

Operating Activities 

Before  working  capital  changes,  cash  generated  from  operations  was  $32.0  million  for  2010,  compared  to 
cash  used  by  operations  of  $21.6  million  as  poor  lumber  markets  significantly  diminished  cash  earnings  in 
2009. 

Total  cash  generated  from  operations  after  changes  in  working  capital  was  $21.0  million  for  the  year,  an 
improvement of $16.2 million over 2009. 

Cash used in working capital was $11.0 million (2009 – cash generated by working capital of $26.4 million).  
Significant  increases  in  operating  rates,  particularly  in  the  B.C.  Interior  sawmills  and  the  U.S.  Pacific 
Northwest (“PNW”) operations, resulted in an inventory build-up of $12.4 million and an increase of  $15.2 
million  in  related  payables.    Improved  operating  levels  are  also  reflected  in  a  $13.5  million  increase  in 
accounts receivable over 2009. 

Poor lumber markets in the comparative periods of 2009 resulted in weak cash from operations.  In response 
the  Company  significantly  curtailed  production  with  a  focus  on  reducing  inventories,  resulting  in  a 
contribution to cash generated from working capital of $16.9 million.  Income taxes contributed $16.0 million 
of  the  cash  generated  from  operating  working  capital  as  the  Company  collected  a  refund  of  taxes  paid  in 
prior years. 

Investing Activities  

Capital  expenditures,  excluding  changes  in  amounts  accrued,  totaled  $42.3  million  for  2010  (2009  -  $27.6 
million), and include the acquisition of a timber tenure in the Kamloops region from Weyerhaeuser Company 
Limited, adding approximately 275,000 cubic meters of allowable annual cut to its interior fibre supply.  In 
addition to the timber acquisition, expenditures were predominately for maintenance of operating capacity, 
some discretionary spending on equipment upgrades  and on road  construction.   Comparative spending  for 
2009 was predominantly for completion of the new Adams Lake sawmill and road construction.  

Cash proceeds from the sale of non-core assets and final settlement compensation under the Forest Act for 
timber and other assets totaled $1.3 million in 2010 (2009 - $37.0 million).  By comparison, 2009 included 
$29.9 million in proceeds from the sale of the Queensboro property, compensation of $2.0 million under the 
Forest Act for timber takeback and proceeds of $4.1 million from the sale of surplus property and buildings 
in Maple Ridge, B.C.  

     
 
18 

Financing Activities 

On  January  15,  2010  the  Company  amended  and  extended  its  existing  syndicated  credit  facilities.    The 
Company’s Operating Line was extended to February 28, 2011 and the Revolving Term Line increased from 
$150 million to $200 million, and its maturity date was extended to February 28, 2012.  All other terms and 
conditions of the lines remained substantially unchanged.   

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010 the Company drew US$35.0 
million ($35.8 million) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled its U.S. dollar non-revolving term 
line (the “Non-Revolving Term Line”).  

On  August  19,  2010,  the  Company  further  amended  and  extended  its  syndicated  credit  facilities.    The 
maturity date of the Operating Line was extended from February 28, 2011 to July 28, 2012 and the maturity 
date of the Revolving Term Line was extended from February 28, 2012 to July 28, 2013.  All other terms and 
conditions of the lines remain substantially unchanged except for a reduction in pricing. 

During the course of 2010, Interfor drew additional funds on the Revolving Term Line primarily to fund the 
acquisition of the timber tenure from Weyerhaeuser and road construction.  Other than letters of credit, the 
Operating Line remained undrawn throughout 2010.  As at December 31, 2010 the unused available credit 
under  these  facilities  totaled  $104.2  million  and,  combined  with  cash  of  $9.3  million,  gave  the  Company  a 
total of $113.5 million of liquidity available. 

During 2010, as share options approached their expiry dates and the Company’s share price rose a number 
of option holders exercised their share options, generating $0.9 million of cash funds.   

On  January  4,  2010,  Seaboard  declared  an  income  distribution  to  its  partners.    Interfor’s  share  was  $3.1 
million and was paid to the Company by way of setoff against the promissory note payable to the Seaboard 
Limited  Partnership.    On  July  30,  2010,  subsequent  to  the  sale  of  one  of  its  two  vessels,  Seaboard  made 
another advance to its partners, with the Company’s share being $6.9 million.  A second advance of which 
the Company’s share was $8.8 million was received on December 30, 2010.  Both advances were repaid by 
way of set-off on January 3, 2011 when Seaboard declared an income distribution to its partners.  

During the course of 2009, Interfor drew on the bank lines primarily for the completion of the new Adams 
Lake  sawmill.    Proceeds  from  the  sale  of  the  Queensboro  property,  the  advance  from  Seaboard  and  the 
refund of taxes previously paid were used to pay down the long-term debt. 

At  December  31,  2010,  the  Company  had  cash  of  $9.3  million.    After  deducting  the  Company’s  drawings 
under its Revolving Term Line, the Company ended the quarter with net debt of $146.7 million or 29.7% of 
invested capital. 

The Company believes, based on projected selling prices, cash flow projections and existing credit lines, that 
it  has  sufficient  resources  to  meet  operating  and  capital  requirements  through  2011.    The  Company 
continues  to  maintain  its  disciplined  approach  to  production,  its  focus  on  managing  the  business  for  cash, 
ensuring  adequate  liquidity  is  maintained  and  realizing  on  the  benefits  of  recent  strategic  activities  and 
investments.  Capital expenditures continue to be monitored.  

     
 
FINANCIAL POSITION  

Summary of Financial Position¹ 

2010 

2009 

2008 
(millions of dollars) 

2007  

19 

2006 

     Current assets 

     Current liabilities 

     Working capital 

     Total assets 

139.0 

107.9 

131.5 

74.2 

64.8 

46.6 

61.3 

79.4 

52.1 

158.3 

50.0 

108.3 

289.7 

123.8 

165.9 

611.9 

582.5 

665.3 

545.9 

673.8 

     Total long-term liabilities and future income taxes 

190.4 

177.9 

179.7 

67.6 

72.1 

     Operating debt 

     Payable to investee company 

     Long-term debt 

     Total debt 

     Shareholders’ equity 

     Invested capital  

Ratio and Investment Information¹ 

     Current ratio 
     Net debt as a percentage of invested capital, adjusted2 

     Total debt as a percentage of invested capital 
     Return on average shareholders’ equity2 
     Return on average invested capital, adjusted2 
     Pre-tax return on total assets1 
     Cash flow from operations as a percentage of total debt2 

     Equity per share 

- 

15.7 

156.0 

171.7 

347.3 

519.0 

- 

3.1 

144.5 

147.6 

358.0 

505.6 

30.6 

3.7 

137.4 

171.7 

406.2 

577.9 

- 

- 

34.7 

34.7 

428.3 

463.0 

0.6 

- 

40.8 

41.4 

478.0 

519.4 

1.9 

2.3 

1.7 

3.2 

2.3 

29.7% 

28.2% 

29.2% 

1.9% 

(29.1)% 

33.1% 

29.2% 

29.7% 

7.5% 

8.0% 

(1.1)% 

(6.3)% 

(13.3)% 

(2.9)% 

22.3% 

0.5% 

(3.4)% 

(10.3)% 

(3.5)% 

25.1% 

(0.4)% 

(9.0)% 

(5.1)% 

(4.3)% 

2.1% 

18.6% 

(14.6)% 

7.6% 

70.2% 

345.8% 

$7.33 

$7.60 

$8.62 

$9.09 

$9.93 

2010 

2009 

2008 
(millions) 

2007  

2006 

     Weighted average shares outstanding for the year 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.6 

48.5 

     Number of shares outstanding at year end: 
             Class A subordinate voting3 
             Class B common3 

Re-investment of Cash 

     Cash flow from operations2 

46.3 

1.0 

47.4 

46.1 

1.0 

47.1 

46.1 

1.0 

47.1 

46.1 

1.0 

47.1 

47.1 

1.0 

48.1 

2010 

2009 

2008 

2007  

2006 

(millions of dollars) 

32.0 

(21.6) 

13.0 

24.4 

143.1 

     Cash generated from (used in) operating working capital                 

(11.0) 

     Proceeds on disposal of assets 

1.3 

26.4 

37.0 

0.7 

5.1 

(70.3) 

8.3 

43.3 

49.2 

     Capital expenditures and acquisitions  

(42.3) 

(27.6) 

(158.9) 

(81.8) 

(90.6) 

1 
2 
3 

Tables may not add due to rounding. 
See Glossary in Annual Information Form for definition. 
As at February 9, 2011, the numbers of shares outstanding by class are:  Class A Subordinate Voting shares – 46,374,676 Class B 
Common shares – 1,015,779, Total – 47,390,455.   

     
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20 

Current Assets 

Cash on hand and deposits at December 31, 2010 totaled $9.3 million compared to $3.8 million from 2009.   

Accounts  receivable  at  December  31,  2010  were  $46.0  million,  up  $13.0  million  over  2009,  primarily  as  a 
result of higher year-end sales volumes and sales values.   

Lumber  inventory  levels  at  December  31,  2010  were  $27.4  million,  up  $3.1  million  compared  to  2009.  
Lumber  inventory  volumes  increased  by  16.5%  resulting  from  the  additional  volumes  at  the  Adams  Lake 
sawmill  and  the  restarted Castlegar  sawmill.   Lumber  inventory  unit  values  decreased  primarily  due  to  the 
reduced levels of higher value cedar lumber in 2010 year-end inventories.   

Log inventory levels at December 31, 2010 were $39.1 million, up $8.1 million compared to 2009, to support 
the  higher  operating  rates  and  increased  log  consumption  of  the  Adams  Lake  sawmill  and  the  restarted 
Castlegar sawmill.  

Investments and Other Assets 

Investments and Other Assets increased by $11.6 million to $28.6 million, up as compared to 2009, primarily 
due  to  equity  income  of  $11.4  million  earned  from  Seaboard  in  2010.    On  January  3,  2011,  the  Seaboard 
Partnership  declared  an  income  distribution  to  its  partners.    Interfor’s  share  was  $15.7  million  and  was 
settled  by  way  of  setoff  against  the  promissory  note  payable  to  the  Seaboard  Partnership  (see  Current 
Liabilities). 

On January 5, 2011, all other partners in the Seaboard Partnership withdrew and the Company became the 
sole owner of Seaboard.  Seaboard Partnership was wound-up on January 7, 2011 and continues operations 
as Seaboard Shipping Company Limited which is wholly owned by Interfor.  Its accounts will be included in 
the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of change in control.  

Property, Plant and Equipment, Timber and Logging Roads 

The Company’s net book value of $431.2 million for property, plant and equipment, timber, logging roads, 
and assets held for sale was a decrease of $13.2 million over 2009.  Capital expenditures including changes 
in amounts accrued  were  $43.1 million, of which  $32.1 million related to investments in road building and 
the acquisition of the timber tenure from Weyerhaeuser Company Limited and the balance of $10.9 million 
was  primarily  for  maintenance  of  operating  capacity  with  some  discretionary  spending  on  equipment 
upgrades.    The  stronger  Canadian  dollar  at  the  end  of  2010  compared  to  the  end  of  2009  resulted  in 
reduction in capital assets of U.S. operations of $8.1 million due to foreign currency revaluations.  Offsetting 
the  investments  in  capital  assets  were  amortization  and  depletion  expense  of  $46.0  million,  and  various 
other minor write-downs and disposals. 

Current Liabilities 

As at December 31, 2010, the Company had a Canadian operating line of credit (“Operating Line”) of $65.0 
million.    Drawings  under  these  lines  are  subject  to  borrowing  base  calculations  dependent  upon  accounts 
receivable, inventories and certain accounts payable.  At year end, the Company had no borrowings under 
its  Operating  Line,  and  its  unused  available  Operating  Line  was  $60.2  million,  after  outstanding  letters  of 
credit of $4.8 million.  The Company’s working capital ratio at December 31, 2010 was 1.9 to 1.   

On January 15, 2010 the Company amended its existing Operating Line and the maturity date was extended 
to  February  28,  2011.    On  August  19,  2010  the  Company  further  amended  and  extended  its  existing 
syndicated credit facilities and the maturity date of the Operating Line was extended to July 28, 2012, with 
all other terms and conditions remaining substantially unchanged except for a reduction in pricing. 

Accounts payable levels at December 31, 2010 were $58.3 million for an increase of $14.8 million over 2009.  
The  increase  in  trade  accounts  payables  and  other  accruals  results  from  increased  operating  rates, 
particularly from logging activities in B.C.  The current portion of reforestation also increased by $3.0 million 
due  to  increased  levels  of  logging  in  2010,  the  Weyerhaeuser  timber  acquisition  and  the  rescheduling  of 
planting projects which had been delayed for cash management reasons during the global downturn.   

In  July  2010,  the  Company  received  an  advance  of  $6.9  million  from  Seaboard,  and  a  further  $8.8  million 
was received in December 2010.  In January 2011, Seaboard declared an income distribution to its partners 
of  which  Interfor’s  share  of  $15.7  million  was  received  by  way  of  setoff  against  the  advance  payable  to 

     
 
21 

Seaboard.  This compares to the advance received in December, 2009 of $3.1 million which was also settled 
by way of an income distribution of the same amount in January 2010. 

Long-Term Liabilities 

As  part  of  its  amendment  and  extension  of  existing  syndicated  credit  facilities  in  January,  2010  the 
Company’s  Canadian  revolving  term  line  (the  “Revolving  Term  Line”)  was  increased  from  $150  million  to 
$200  million,  and  its  maturity  date  was  extended  to  February  28,  2012.    In  August,  2010,  the  Company 
further amended and extended its existing syndicated credit facilities and the maturity date of the Revolving 
Term Line was extended to July 28, 2013.  Except for a reduction in pricing, all other terms and conditions of 
the line remained unchanged.  The Revolving Term Line bears interest at rates based on bank prime plus a 
premium, depending upon a financial ratio or, at the Company's option, at rates for Bankers' Acceptances or 
LIBOR based loans.   

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010, the Company drew US$35.0 
million ($35.8 million) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled its U.S. dollar non-revolving term 
line (the “Non-Revolving Term Line”).  At December 31, 2009 the Non-Revolving Term Line was fully drawn 
at  US$35.0  million  and  was  revalued  at  the  year-end  exchange  rate  to  $36.8  million.    The  Company 
subsequently  drew  a  further  $36.7  million  and  repaid  the  drawings  of  US$35.0  million  used  to  repay  the 
Non-Revolving Term Line.   

At December 31, 2010, the Revolving Term Line was drawn by $126.0 million (2009 - $76.0 million), and by 
US$30.2  million  (2009  –  US$30.2  million)  revalued  at  the  year-end  exchange  rate  to  $30.0  million  (2009  - 
$31.7 million)  for total drawings of  $156.0 million (2009 - $107.7 million)  and leaving an  unused available 
line of $44.0 million.  Together with the Non-Revolving Term Line which was outstanding at December 31, 
2009, drawings totaled $144.5 million, leaving an unused available line of $42.3 million.   

Overall, long-term liabilities excluding long-term debt, increased only marginally by $0.7 million, with small 
decreases  in  a  number  of  areas  slightly  offsetting  an  increase  of  $1.2  million  in  long-term  incentive 
compensation  reflecting  an  increase  in  the  Company’s  closing  share  price  which  rose  from  $4.69  at 
December 31, 2009 to $5.60 at December 31, 2010.   

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

As at December 31, 2010, the Company had working capital of $64.8 million (2009 - $61.3 million), $104.2 
million (2009 - $99.2 million) available on its operating and term lines and $9.3 million in cash.   

On  January  15,  2010,  the  Revolving  Term  Line  was  increased  from  $150  million  to  $200  million  and  the 
maturity  dates  of  the  Operating  Line  and  the  Revolving  Term  Line  were  both  extended.    On  August  10, 
2010, the maturity dates were further extended to July 28, 2012 for the Operating Line and July 28, 2013 
for  the  Revolving  Term  Line.    The  Non-Revolving  Term  Line  facility  of  US$35.0  million  was  cancelled  on 
January 15, 2010 after drawings were fully repaid.   

These resources, in addition to cash generated from operations, will be used to support our working capital 
requirements, debt servicing commitments, and any essential capital expenditures.   

Interfor has had positive EDITDA in each of the past five years in total, and, despite the difficult economic 
climate over the last three years, for ten of the past twelve quarters.  In addition, in the fourth quarter, 2010 
Interfor showed positive earnings from operations for the first time in over four years. 

Interfor believes that its existing credit lines will be sufficient to satisfy the funding of operating and capital 
requirements  for  the  foreseeable  future.    The  Company  continues  to  maintain  its  disciplined  approach  to 
production, focus on managing the business for cash, ensure adequate liquidity is maintained and realize on 
the benefits of recent strategic activities and investments.   

     
 
Summary of Contractual Obligations  

The payments due in respect of contractual and legal obligations may be summarized as follows: 

22 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Income taxes payable 
Payable to investee company¹ 
Long-term debt 
Reforestation liability 
Other long-term liabilities 
Pension solvency payments 
Operating leases and  
     contractual commitments 

Payments due by period 
Up to 
1 year 

2-3 
years 

4-5 
years 

After 5 
years 

$ 

Total 

44.4  $ 
0.2 
15.7 
156.0 
28.2 
21.8 
4.2 

(millions of dollars) 

44.4  $ 
0.2 
15.7 
- 
9.8 
4.1 
1.5 

$ 

- 
- 
- 
156.0 
6.9 
5.4 
1.5 

19.3 

6.1 

5.9 

$ 

- 
- 
- 
- 
5.4 
1.8 
0.8 

4.1 

- 
- 
- 
- 
6.0 
10.5 
0.4 

3.2 

Total contractual obligations 2 

$ 

289.9  $ 

81.8  $ 

175.9  $ 

12.1  $ 

20.1 

1   On January 3, 2011, the Seaboard Partnership declared an income distribution to its partners, of which the Company’s share was 
$15.7 million and was paid to the company by way of setoff against the promissory note payable to the Seaboard Partnership. 

2   Table may not add due to rounding. 

Related Party Transactions 

Lumber sales to a significant shareholder amounted to $0.8 million (2009 - $0.9 million).  Shipping services 
provided by Seaboard International Shipping Company Limited totaled $7.0 million (2009 - $4.7 million).  In 
addition, the Company provided management and other support services to Seaboard totaling  $0.5 million 
(2009 - $nil).  These transactions were conducted on a normal commercial basis, including terms and prices 
and did not result in any ongoing contractual or other commitments.   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 

The  Company  has  off-balance  sheet  arrangements  which  encompass  letters  of  credit  and  surety 
performance bonds, primarily for timber sales.  These are more fully described in Note 7(a) and Note 15(e) 
in the Consolidated Financial Statements.  At December 31, 2010, the total of such instruments aggregated 
$12.9 million (2009 - $12.1 million).  Off-balance sheet arrangements have not had, and are not reasonably 
likely  to  have,  any  material  impact  on  the  Company’s  current  or  future  financial  condition,  results  of 
operations or cash flows. 

Summary of Issuance of Shares  

There have been no issuances of shares over the last five years, other than those shares issued on exercised 
employee options.   

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1 

Quarterly Earnings Summary 

2010 

2009 

23 

Q1 
Q4 
(millions of dollars except share, per share and foreign exchange rate amounts) 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Sales – Lumber 

        – Logs 

        – Wood chips and other by-products 

        – Other 

Total Sales  

137.5 

113.1 

123.7 

107.6 

20.6 

15.7 

2.4 

21.9 

14.0 

2.4 

19.8 

13.3 

1.0 

17.4 

13.2 

1.7 

93.1 

17.3 

12.2 

2.9 

76.8 

17.3 

8.9 

2.2 

62.3 

13.0 

5.9 

0.6 

56.5 

12.8 

7.4 

0.6 

176.3 

151.5 

157.9 

139.9 

125.5 

105.2 

81.8 

77.3 

Operating earnings (loss) before restructuring costs 

and asset write-downs 

Operating earnings (loss) 

Net earnings (loss) 

Net earnings (loss) per share – basic and diluted 
EBITDA5 
Adjusted EBITDA5 
Cash flow from operations per share2 
Shares outstanding – end of period (millions)3 

                            – weighted average (millions) 
Average foreign exchange rate per US$1.004 
Closing foreign exchange rate per US$1.004 

1.3 

1.3 

0.6 

(2.3) 

(2.8) 

1.5 

(1.4) 

(2.4) 

(2.6) 

(3.1) 

(3.1) 

(3.4) 

(7.8) 

(7.0) 

(16.4) 

(15.2) 

(7.8) 

(10.4) 

(16.3) 

(16.3) 

(5.0) 

9.7 

(15.0) 

(13.6) 

0.01 

0.03 

(0.06) 

(0.07) 

(0.11) 

0.21 

(0.32) 

(0.29) 

14.6 

15.3 

13.5 

14.5 

0.19 

47.4 

47.2 

10.6 

0.13 

47.1 

47.1 

13.1 

0.19 

47.1 

47.1 

9.7 

9.7 

6.3 

5.7 

25.3 

(7.3) 

(7.7) 

3.6 

(7.3) 

(8.4) 

0.17 

0.06 

(0.07) 

(0.23) 

(0.22) 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

47.1 

1.0131 

1.0395 

1.0283 

1.0401 

1.0571 

1.0980 

1.1669 

1.2446 

0.9946 

1.0290 

1.0646 

1.0158 

1.0510 

1.0707 

1.1630 

1.2613 

1 
2 
3 

4 

5 

Tables may not add due to rounding. 
Cash generated from operations before taking account of changes in operating working capital. 
As  at  February  9,  2011,  the  numbers  of  shares  outstanding  by  class  are:    Class  A  Subordinate  Voting  shares  –  46,374,676  Class  B 
Common shares – 1,015,779, Total – 47,390,455.   
Accounting quarter-end dates may differ slightly from the reporting date.  As such, the foreign exchange rate used to revalue quarter-
end balances may differ from those calculated using the Bank of Canada closing foreign exchange rate per US$1.00. 
The  Company  discloses  EBITDA  as  it  is  a  measure  used  by  analysts  and  Interfor’s  management  to  evaluate  the  Company's 
performance.  As EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure, it may not be comparable to EBITDA calculated by others.  In addition, as EBITDA is 
not  a  substitute  for  net  earnings,  readers  should  consider  net  earnings  in  evaluating  the  Company's  performance.    Adjusted  EBITDA 
represents  EBITDA  adjusted  for  other  income  and  other  income  of  the  investee  company.    EBITDA  and  Adjusted  EBITDA  can  be 
calculated from the statements of operations as follows: 

Net earnings (loss) 
Add: Income taxes (recovery) 
  Interest expense 
  Depletion and amortization 
  Other foreign exchange (gains) losses 
  Restructuring costs, asset write-downs and other 
EBITDA 
Deduct: 
   Other income (expense) 
   Other income of investee company 
Adjusted EBITDA 

2010 

2009 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

0.6 
(0.1) 
2.1 
11.9 
0.2 
- 
14.6 

(0.3) 
0.4 
14.5 

1.5 
(0.1) 
2.1 
11.2 
0.1 
0.5 
15.3 

(0.1) 
4.8 
10.6 

(millions of dollars) 
(5.0) 
(3.3) 
2.0 
12.5 
0.1 
0.1 
6.3 

(3.4) 
(0.4) 
2.0 
11.4 
- 
- 
9.7 

- 
- 
9.7 

0.6 
- 
5.7 

(2.6) 
0.2 
2.3 
12.6 
0.1 
1.1 
13.5 

0.4 
- 
13.1 

9.7 
0.1 
2.2 
9.9 
- 
3.3 
25.3 

21.7 
- 
3.6 

(15.0) 
(3.6) 
2.0 
9.5 
(0.1) 
(0.1) 
(7.3) 

- 
- 
(7.3) 

(13.6) 
(3.1) 
1.6 
6.3 
- 
1.1 
(7.7) 

0.6 
- 
(8.4) 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
24 

Volume and Price Statistics 

2010 

2009 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

Q4 

Q3 

Q2 

Q1 

Lumber sales 

Lumber production 
Log sales1 

Log production1 

Average selling price – lumber2 
Average selling price – logs1 

(million fbm) 

(million fbm) 

(thousand cubic 
metres) 
(thousand cubic 
metres) 
($/thousand fbm) 

($/cubic metre) 

Average selling price – pulp chips 

($/thousand fbm) 

321 

303 

292 

277 

272 

289 

270 

277 

262 

264 

258 

239 

234 

245 

261 

181 

180 

242 

131 

115 

216 

122 

121 

200 

794 

595 

624 

648 

533 

378 

312 

72 

$428 

$408 

$459 

$408 

$398 

$424 

$477 

$462 

$64 

$42 

$73 

$40 

$68 

$37 

$64 

$40 

$62 

$39 

$69 

$38 

$56 

$40 

$54 

$46 

1  B.C. operations 
2  Gross sales before duties and export taxes 

Quarterly  trends  normally  reflect  the  seasonality  of  the  Company’s  operations.    Logging  operations  are 
seasonal due to a number of factors including weather, ground conditions and fire season woods closures.  
Generally,  the  Company’s  coastal  logging  divisions  experience  higher  production  levels  in  the  latter  half  of 
the  first  quarter,  throughout  the  second  and  third  quarters  and  in  the  first  half  of  the  fourth  quarter.  
Logging  activity  in  the  interior  is  generally  higher  in  the  first  half  of  the  first  quarter,  slows  during  spring 
thaw  and  increases  in  the  third  and  fourth  quarters.    Sawmill  operations  are  less  seasonal  than  logging 
operations  but  are  dependent  on  the  availability  of  logs  from  logging  operations,  including  those  from 
suppliers.  In addition, the market demand for lumber and related products is generally lower in the winter 
due to reduced construction activity, which increases during the spring, summer and fall.   

The  impact  of  the  global  recession  on  overall  demand  and  poor  lumber  sales  realizations  increased  the 
operating losses in the first three quarters of 2009.  Operating rates increased in the fourth quarter of 2009 
and  first  quarter,  2010,  as  lumber  prices  rose  in  response  to  increased  North  American  demand  and  a 
temporary supply/demand imbalance.  During the same period off-shore demand increased, particularly from 
China which continued through the remaining quarters of 2010.   

The volatility of the Canadian dollar also impacted results, given that historically over 75% of the Canadian 
operation’s  sales  are  to  export  markets  and  priced  in  $US.    A  strong  Canadian  dollar  reduces  the  lumber 
sales realizations in Canada, but lessens the impact  of any losses in U.S. operations.   All quarters of  2009 
and 2010 include the effect of a tax valuation allowance against future tax assets which serves to reduce or 
eliminate any income tax recoveries on the Statement of Operations.  The third quarter of 2009 includes an 
after-tax gain of $19.0 million from the sale of the former Queensboro sawmill site. 

Quarter 4, 2010 Compared to Quarter 4, 2009 

Overview 

The Company recorded net earnings of $0.6 million,  or $0.01 per share,  for the fourth quarter of 2010 as 
compared  to  a  net  loss  of  $5.0  million,  or  $0.11  per  share  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2009.    Before 
restructuring costs, foreign exchange gains (losses), other one-time items and a tax valuation allowance, the 
Company’s  net  earnings  for  the  fourth  quarter,  2010  was  $0.7  million  after-tax,  or  $0.01  per  share,  as 
compared to a net loss of $4.4 million after-tax, or $0.09 per share for the fourth quarter, 2009. 

EBITDA  and  Adjusted  EBITDA  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2010  were  $14.6  million  and  $14.5  million, 
respectively, compared to $6.3 million and $5.7 million, for the comparative quarter in 2009.   

Lumber pricing in the North American markets have been impacted by record volumes of lumber, particularly 
from the Pacific Northwest and B.C., exported to meet increased demand from China as they look to satisfy 
their growing need for construction lumber and industrial timber applications.  Increased shipments to China 
impacted  supply  available  to  the  North  American  markets  which  improved  pricing  of  North  American 
products due to a supply/demand imbalance and the existence of lean inventories.  This is evidenced by the 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 

movement of the average price reported by Random Lengths for SPF 2x4 #2&Btr from US$233 per mfbm for 
September,  2010  to  US$285  per  mfbm  at  the  end  of  December,  2010  and  is  magnified  even  more  in 
comparison to the fourth quarter, 2009 average price of US$206 per mfbm. 

Improved  pricing  impacted  both  sales  realizations  and  ending  inventory  valuations  for  the  Company  in  the 
fourth quarter, 2010 resulting in positive operating earnings in the quarter for the first time since the third 
quarter, 2006. 

Changes  in  the  Castlegar  sawmill  operating  configuration  in  early  2010,  achieved  with  the  support  of  the 
mill’s employees and other local stakeholders and without the benefit of any significant capital expenditures, 
continued to contribute a marked improvement in the mill’s cost structure and impact fourth quarter, 2010 
results.   

The Company continued to monitor and adjust production levels in all operations to match product demand 
and control inventory levels. 

Sales 

Compared to the same quarter of 2009, lumber shipments were up 37.1% or 87 million board feet for the 
fourth quarter of 2010, reflecting additional production from Adams Lake and the recommenced operations 
at  Grand  Forks  and  Castlegar  sawmills.    Slower  growth  in  demand  in  the  U.S.  markets  continues  to  be 
replaced  by  strong  growth  in  the  demand  for  product  from  China.    For  the  fourth  quarter,  2010,  in 
comparison  to  the  fourth  quarter,  2009  and  excluding  wholesale  programs,  44%  of  all  lumber  shipments 
were directed to the U.S., a decline of 13%, and more than offset by shipments to Chinese markets which 
grew by 16%.  

Relative to the same periods in 2009, unit lumber sales values increased by $31 per mfbm, or 7.8%, for the 
fourth  quarter,  2010  reflecting  significantly  improved  North  American  structural  lumber  product  prices, 
somewhat tempered by the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar.  Compared to the average of the 
fourth quarter of 2009, the Canadian dollar appreciated 4 cents relative to its U.S. counterpart.   

Log sales were up $3.3 million, or 18.9%, for the fourth quarter, 2010 as sales volumes increased by 32,000 
m3 or 12.1% vis-à-vis its comparative in 2009.  Unit sales values on the B.C. Coast, where the majority of 
log sales are transacted, moved up 5.2% reflecting improved log markets and a lesser pulp log component.  

Compared to the same periods of 2009, pulp chip and other by-product revenues for the fourth quarter of 
2010 were up $3.5 million, a reflection of higher sawmill operating rates.  Average chip prices for the fourth 
quarter, 2010 increased on both the B.C. Coast as well as in the U.S. reflecting increased global demand for 
pulp over the same quarter, 2009. More significant price increases in the U.S. were negated by the stronger 
Canadian dollar. 

Operating Costs 

Production  costs  for  the  fourth  quarter  of  2010  increased  $40.8  million,  or  35.8%  compared  to  the  same 
period in 2009.  Lumber production increased by 58 million board feet for the fourth quarter, 2010 compared 
to the same quarter, 2009 driven by increased production at the B.C. Interior sawmills.   

Unit cash conversion costs remained constant, quarter-over-quarter as compared to 2009  as increased per 
unit conversion costs resulting from a curtailment at the Beaver sawmill were offset by a stronger Canadian 
dollar.      In  addition,  fibre  supply  for  the  U.S.  Pacific  Northwest  sawmills  remains  tight  and  resulted  in 
sizeable increases in log costs for U.S. operations. 

Compared  to  the  same  period  in  2009,  B.C.  log  production  grew  by  260,000  cubic  metres  for  the  fourth 
quarter, 2010 driven by the seasonality of logging in the B.C. interior and the increased demand for logs in 
the B.C. Interior sawmills resulting from improved operating rates as compared to 2009.  Unit logging costs 
for the fourth quarter remained relatively constant, year-over-year. 

Compared to the same period, 2009, Canadian shipments to the U.S. for the fourth quarter, 2010 rose by 25 
million board feet or 70.2% which corresponds with a 70% increase in export taxes, or $1.0 million as the 
tax rate for both periods remained at 15%.   

Selling and administrative costs for the fourth quarter, 2010 increased by $0.6 million compared to the same 
quarter,  2009  primarily  as  a  result  of  additional  corporate  development  expenditures  and  expansion  of 

     
 
26 

export sales administration.  Long-term incentive compensation (“LTIC”) expense is impacted by the change 
in the Company’s share price and showed an expense of $1.4 million for the fourth quarter, 2010, reflecting 
a  40.4%  increase  in  the  Company’s  share  price  over  the  quarter.    Similarly,  LTIC  expense  in  the  fourth 
quarter, 2009, resulted from a 49.8% improvement of the share price for that quarter. 

Fourth quarter, 2010 amortization of plant and equipment remained flat in comparison to the fourth quarter, 
2009  despite  the  inclusion  of  Castlegar  sawmill  for  2010  as  the  investment  in  capital  assets  at  the  mill  is 
extremely low.   

Road amortization and depletion expense for the  fourth quarter of 2010 declined by $0.5 million or 10.8% 
for the quarter vis-à-vis the same quarter, 2009 as a result of decreased logging activity on the B.C. Coast 
with log production lower by 58,000 cubic metres or 13.8%.  

Interest, Other Foreign Exchange Gain (loss), Other Income 

Fourth quarter, 2010, interest expense was virtually unchanged as compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, 
with  an  increase  in  average  lending  rates  in  2010  partially  offset  by  a  stronger  Canadian  dollar.    Other 
foreign exchange gains (losses) were negligible for both years.   

The  Company  reported  Other  income  (expense)  of  ($0.3)  million  for  the  fourth  quarter,  2010  from  the 
disposal of surplus equipment and roads as compared to a gain of $0.6 million realized in the fourth quarter, 
2009.    Increased  equity  participation  in  the  earnings  of  Seaboard  with  greater  shipment  volumes  by  the 
Company relative to the other partners, improved equity earnings in comparison to 2009.  

Income Taxes 

The Company recorded an income tax recovery of $0.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to 
a $3.3 million recovery in  the comparative period  of  2009.   The valuation allowance against certain  future 
income tax assets arising from loss carry-forwards available to reduce future taxable income was increased 
by  $0.1  million  (fourth  quarter,  2010  -  $1.0  million).    Although  the  Company  expects  to  realize  the  full 
benefit  of  the  loss  carry-forwards,  the  Company  has  provided  a  valuation  allowance  in  respect  of  its 
operating loss carry-forwards, net of temporary differences. 

Cash Flow  

Cash generated by the Company from operations, after changes in working capital, was $3.7 million for the 
fourth quarter of 2010, compared to cash used of $12.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2009.  The increase 
in  accounts  receivable  partially  offset  by  a  rise  in  accounts  payable  was  the  result  of  the  higher  operating 
rates and export shipments in the fourth quarter of 2010.   

Capital  expenditures  continued  to  be  closely  monitored.    Spending  of  $4.6  million  on  plant  and  equipment 
was  evenly  divided  between  high  return  discretionary  projects  and  spending  related  to  maintenance  of 
operating capacity, with spending on road construction totaling $4.6 million.  Comparative spending for the 
fourth  quarter,  2009  was  primarily  for  road  construction  as  all  other  capital  expenditures  were  severely 
curtailed. 

In the fourth quarter, 2010 the Company received an $8.8 million advance from Seaboard which it used to 
pay down a portion of its Revolving Term Line.  An advance from Seaboard of $3.1 million received in the 
fourth quarter, 2009 was used together with drawings of $15.0 million on the Revolving Term Line to fund 
cash used in operations and priority capital expenditures. 

The Company had cash of $9.3 million at December 31, 2010 and ended the quarter with net debt of $146.7 
million or 29.7% of invested capital. 

Controls and Procedures  

As  required  by  Multilateral  Instrument  52-109  issued  by  the  Canadian  Securities  Administrators,  Interfor 
carried  out  an  evaluation  of  the  design  and  effectiveness  of  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures as of December 31, 2010.  The evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the 
participation  of  the  Chief  Executive  Officer  (“CEO”)  and  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  (“CFO”).    Based  on  the 
evaluation,  the  CEO  and  CFO  concluded  that  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were 
effective as of December 31, 2010.   

     
 
27 

As  required  by  Multilateral  Instrument  52-109  issued  by  the  Canadian  Securities  Administrators,  Interfor 
carried  out  an  evaluation  of  the  design  and  effectiveness  of  the  Company’s  internal  controls  over  financial 
reporting  (“ICFR”)  as  of  December  31,  2010.    The  evaluation  was  carried  out  within  the  COSO  framework 
and under the supervision of, and with the participation of the CEO and the CFO.  Based on the evaluation, 
the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s ICFR were effective as of December 31, 2010.   

The  CEO  and  CFO  acknowledge  responsibility  for  the  design  of  ICFR,  and  confirm  that  there  were  no 
changes  in  these  controls  that  occurred  during  the  most  recent  interim  period  ended  December  31,  2010 
which materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s ICFR. 

Critical Accounting Estimates   

Valuation of Accounts Receivable.  Interfor regularly reviews the collectability of its accounts receivable and 
records  an  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  based  on  its  best  estimate  of  any  potentially  uncollectible 
accounts.    Consideration  is  given  to  current  economic  conditions  and  specific  customer  circumstances  to 
determine the amount of any bad debt expenses to be recorded.   

The Company’s exposure to credit risk is dependent upon individual characteristics of each customer.  Each 
new customer is assessed for creditworthiness before standard payment and delivery terms and conditions 
are offered, with such review encompassing any external ratings, and bank and other references.  Purchase 
limits are established for each customer, and are regularly reviewed.  In some cases, where customers fail to 
meet the Company’s benchmark creditworthiness, the Company may choose to transact with the customer 
on a prepayment basis.   

All North American sales are conducted under standard industry terms.  All lumber sales outside of the North 
American  markets  are  either  insured  by  the  Export  Development  Corporation  or  letters  of  credit  or  are 
prepaid in advance of shipment. 

The Company regularly reviews the collectability of its accounts receivable and establishes an allowance for 
doubtful  accounts  based  on  its  best  estimate  of  any  potentially  uncollectible  accounts.    Historically,  the 
Company has experienced minimal bad debts and this held true for 2010, despite the impacts of the global 
economic downturn and historical low housing starts.  Based on this past experience and its detailed review 
of trade accounts receivable past due, a negligible reserve (2009 - $0.1 million) was set up for specific trade 
receivables. 

Although  Interfor  has  not  experienced  any  significant  bad  debt  expenses  in  prior  periods,  declines  in  the 
economy could result in collectability concerns.  Accounts receivable balances for individual customers could 
potentially be material at any given time. 

Valuation of Inventories.  Interfor values its lumber inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value 
on  a  specific  product  basis.    Log  inventories  are  valued  at  the  lower  of  cost  and  net  realizable  value  on  a 
specific boom or sort basis.  Other inventories consist primarily of seedlings, spare parts, and supplies and 
are recorded at the lower of cost and replacement cost.  The unit net realizable value for lumber inventories 
and Coastal log inventories is determined by reference to the average sales values by specific product in the 
period  immediately  following  the  reporting  date.    The  unit  realizable  value  for  Interior  and  U.S.  log 
inventories is determined by reference to the value of the projected lumber and residual outturns.  The unit 
cost for lumber is based on a three month moving average actual cost, lagged by one month and adjusted 
for  unusual items.   The unit cost  for Coastal logs is based on a twelve month moving average actual cost 
and for Interior logs is based on a three month moving average actual cost, both lagged by one month and 
adjusted for unusual items.  The unit cost for U.S. logs is based on actual specific cost.  Instances where net 
realizable  value  is  lower  than  cost  result  in  a  charge  to  operating  earnings  in  the  period.    Downward 
movements in commodity prices could result in a material write-down of inventory at any given time. 

Recoverability  of  Property,  Plant  and  Equipment,  Logging  Roads,  Timber  and  Goodwill.    Interfor’s 
assessment  of  recoverability  of  property,  plant  and  equipment,  timber  and  logging  roads  is  made  with 
reference  to  projections  of  future  cash  flows  to  be  generated  by  its  operations.    The  assessment  of 
recoverability of goodwill is also made with reference to projections of future cash flows to be generated by 
the related reporting unit, and discounted to estimate the fair value of goodwill.   

     
 
28 

These  projections  necessitate  the  estimation  of  sales  and  production  volumes,  future  commodity  pricing, 
operating costs, foreign currency exchange rates, export taxes, and other factors.  There is a high degree of 
uncertainty  in  such  estimations,  and,  as  such,  any  significant  change  in  assumptions  could  result  in  a 
conclusion that the carrying value of these assets could not be recovered, which could necessitate a material 
charge against operating earnings. 

For  goodwill,  an  appropriate  discount  rate  is  determined  by  reference  to  current  market  conditions  and 
specific company factors. 

Interfor  assesses  the  recoverability  of  Property,  Plant  and  Equipment,  and  Timber  and  Logging  Roads  as 
conditions and events warrant.  Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, and whenever events or changes 
in circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist.  The Company assessed the recoverability of these 
assets as at December 31, 2010, and concluded that there were no impairments. 

Reforestation and Other Forestry-related Liabilities.    Crown  legislation  requires  the  Company  to  complete 
reforestation activities on its forest and timber tenures.  Accordingly, Interfor records the estimated cost of 
reforestation  as  the  timber  is  cut,  and  includes  these  expenses  in  the  cost  of  current  production.    The 
estimate  of  future  reforestation  costs  is  based  on  detailed  prescriptions  of  reforestation  as  prepared  by 
Registered  Professional  Foresters  employed  or  contracted  by  the  Company.    Considerations  include  the 
specifics  of  the  areas  logged  and  the  treatments  prescribed  for  those  areas,  as  well  as  the  timing  and 
success  rates  of  the  planned  activities.    Estimates  of  reforestation  liability  could  be  materially  impacted  by 
forest  fires,  wildlife  grazing,  unfavourable  weather  conditions,  changing  legislative  requirements  and 
standards, or inaccurate projections, which could result in a charge against operating earnings. 

The Company also has a legal obligation to deactivate certain roads constructed and used to access timber 
once that access is  no longer required.  Accordingly, Interfor also accrues the  cost of road deactivation as 
the related timber is cut, including those expenses in the cost of current production.  The estimate of future 
road  deactivation  cost  is  based  on  comprehensive  plans  prepared  by  Professional  Foresters  and  Engineers 
employed  by  Interfor  and  includes  such  considerations  as  road  structure  and  terrain.    Estimates  of  road 
deactivation liability could be materially impacted by unfavourable terrain, changing legislative requirements 
and standards, or inaccurate projections, which could result in a charge against operating earnings. 

Each of these estimates is reviewed regularly on an ongoing basis. 

Environmental Obligations.  Environmental expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past 
operations  are  charged  as  current  production  costs  once  existence  of  a  liability  and  costs  of  rehabilitation 
efforts  can  be  reasonably  determined.    Interfor  engages  independent  third  party  experts  to  assist  in 
determining  the  existence  of  environmental  liabilities,  appropriate  prescriptions  for  treatment  and  related 
costs.  Estimates of environmental obligations could be materially impacted by a number of factors including 
incorrect  or  incomplete  problem  definition  and  identification  of  treatments,  or  inaccurate  cost  projections.  
Incorrect estimates could result in a material charge against operating earnings. 

Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits.    Interfor  sponsors  various  defined  contribution  pension  plans 
available,  based  on  eligibility  requirements,  to  all  Canadian  salaried  and  all  US  employees.    The  Company 
sponsors two defined benefit plans for those hourly employees not covered by forest industry union plans.  
It also sponsors a post-retirement medical and life insurance plan.   

The Company retains independent actuarial consultants to value the defined pension benefit obligations, the 
post retirement medical and life insurance obligations and related plan asset values.  Actuarial assumptions 
used in the valuation of obligations and values include assumptions of the discount rate used in calculations 
of net present value of obligations, expected rates of return on plan assets to be used to fund obligations, 
and  assumed  rates  of  increase  for  employee  compensation  and  health  care  costs.    Actual  experience  can 
vary  materially  from  estimates  and  could  result  in  a  material  charge  against  operating  earnings  as  well  as 
necessitate a current cash funding requirement. 

Income Taxes.  The  Company’s  provision  for  income  taxes,  both  current  and  future,  is  based  on  various 
judgments,  assumptions  and  estimates  including  the  tax  treatment  of  transactions  recorded  in  the 
Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Interfor records provisions for federal, provincial and foreign 

     
 
29 

taxes based on the respective tax rules and regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates.  
Due to the number of variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates, and differing tax 
rules and regulations across the multiple jurisdictions, the precision and reliability of the resulting estimates 
are subject to uncertainties and may change as additional information becomes known. 

Income  tax  assets  and  liabilities,  both  current  and  future,  are  measured  according  to  the  income  tax 
legislation  that  is  expected  to  apply  when  the  asset  is  realized  or  the  liability  settled.    Future  income  tax 
assets and liabilities are comprised of the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount 
and tax basis of assets and liabilities, tax loss carry  forwards and tax credits.  Assumptions underlying the 
composition of tax assets and liabilities include estimates of future results of operations and the timing of the 
reversal of temporary differences as well as the tax rates and laws in the applicable jurisdictions at the time 
of  the  reversal.    The  composition  of  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  is  reasonably  likely  to  change  from 
period to period due to the uncertainties surrounding these assumptions. 

NEW ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ACCOUNTING POLICY CHANGES  

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted three new CICA accounting standards: 

(a)  Handbook Section 1582, Business Combinations which replaces CICA Handbook Section 1581, Business 
Combinations,  and  establishes  revised  standards  for  the  recognition,  measurement,  presentation  and 
disclosure of business acquisitions and aligns Canadian GAAP with IFRS standards.   

(b)  Handbook Section 1601, Consolidated Financial Statements and Handbook Section 1602, Non-Controlling 
Interests,  which  replace  Handbook  Section  1600,  Consolidated Financial Statements,  and  establish 
revised standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements.   

Adoption of these standards had no retrospective impact on the consolidated financial statements. 

Future Accounting Policy Changes 

Convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards 

In  February  2008,  the  Canadian  Accounting  Standards  Board  confirmed  that  Canadian  generally  accepted 
accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”) will be converged with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(“IFRS”) for fiscal years commencing January 1, 2011.  The transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS will be 
applicable  for  the  Company  for  the  first  quarter  of  2011  when  the  Company  will  prepare  both  the  current 
and comparative financial information using IFRS. 

While  IFRS  uses  a  conceptual  framework  similar  to  Canadian  GAAP,  there  are  significant  differences  on 
recognition, measurement, and disclosures.  The Company has identified a number of key areas that will be 
impacted  by  changes  in  accounting  policies,  including:    property,  plant,  and  equipment;  impairment  of 
assets; provisions, including reforestation liabilities and asset retirement obligations; share-based payments; 
employee  future  benefits;  and  future  income  taxes.    Management  is  finalizing  the  determination  of  the 
impact of the application of IFRS on the financial statements and having these impacts audited.   

A review of the Company’s information systems and the day-to-day accounting processes and controls has 
been  carried  out  during  the  IFRS  conversion  project  and  no  significant  impacts  were  identified.     No 
significant changes to computer systems have been required and no changes which materially affect, or are 
reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  Company’s  controls  have  been  required.   To  ensure  the 
effectiveness of the key monitoring controls under IFRS, additional training has been performed in relation to 
the specific impacts of IFRS on the Company’s financial policies and statements. 

As a first-time adopter of IFRS, the Company is required to apply IFRS 1 First time adoption of International 
Reporting Standards  which  provides  a  number  of  optional  exemptions  to  first-time  adopters  to  ease  the 
transition to IFRS.  The Company expects to apply exemptions under each of the following IFRS 1 categories 
which are significant to the Company’s opening balance sheet: 

Property, plant and equipment 

IFRS 1 allows a company to use fair value as the deemed cost for items of property, plant and equipment at 
the  date  of  transition  which  results  in  an  adjustment  to  Retained  earnings  in  the  opening  Balance  Sheet.  

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 

The Company has identified a property at its Hammond sawmill site for which it will take this election at the 
transition date.  The impact is expected to increase property, plant and equipment on the Balance Sheet as 
at January 1, 2010 by $15.7 million. 

Cumulative translation adjustments 

IFRS  1  provides  an  exemption  that  allows  the  cumulative  translation  adjustments  to  be  set  to  zero  at  the 
date of transition as an adjustment to Retained earnings in the opening Balance Sheet.  Interfor expects to 
take advantage of this exemption which would result in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and Retained 
earnings in the opening Balance sheet to each decrease by $24.9 million at January 1, 2010. 

Employee future benefits 

IFRS  1  provides  an  exemption  that  allows  recognition  of  all  unamortized  actuarial  gains  and  losses  at  the 
transition date as an adjustment to Retained earnings in the opening Balance Sheet.  The impact of this is 
expected to be a reduction in Investments and other assets on the Balance Sheet as at January 1, 2010 by 
$7.2  million  for  the  defined  benefit  pension  plan  liabilities  of  the  Company.    In  addition,  Investments  and 
other  assets  are  expected  to  be  reduced  by  a  further  $0.8  million  to  reflect  the  Company’s  share  of  its 
investee’s pension adjustment as at January 1, 2010. 

Business combinations 

IFRS  1  provides  an  exemption  which  eliminates  the  requirement  to  restate  business  combinations  entered 
into  prior  to  the  date  of  transition.    Interfor  does  not  expect  to  restate  any  of  its  previous  business 
combination accounting. 

Impairment of assets 

IFRS requires the assessment of asset impairment to be based on a comparison of the asset carrying value 
and its recoverable amount, usually based on its value in use as represented by its discounted future cash 
flows.    Under  Canadian  GAAP  the  assessment  of  impairments  provides  for  a  two-step  test  with  no 
impairment recognized if the undiscounted future cash flows exceed the carrying value of the related asset.  
Discounting is required only as a second step to quantify an impairment. 

As such, impairments are more likely under IFRS standards.  Where an impairment is required under IFRS, 
future amortization charges will decrease with a lower amortization base. 

IFRS  also  provides  for  the  reversal  of  previously  recognized  asset  impairments,  excluding  goodwill,  where 
conditions justify such reversals.  Canadian GAAP does not allow reversal of impairments recognized in the 
financial statements. 

These changes in standards may result in the potential for more impairments recognized against income in 
the future as well as more volatility as reversals occur. 

Based on the Company’s analysis, Interfor does not expect any impairments to be recorded as at January 1, 
2010 under IFRS. 

Provisions 

IFRS has a broader threshold for the recognition of provisions than that provided under Canadian GAAP and 
may result in additional liabilities being recognized under IFRS and requires the discount rate for evaluation 
of asset retirement obligations to reflect the current risk-free interest rate.  As a result, the Company expects 
to  increase  its  Reforestation  liability,  net  of  current  portion  on  the  Balance  Sheet  by  $1.9  million,  and  its 
Other long-term liabilities by $0.9 million under IFRS on January 1, 2010, for a total of $2.8 million increase 
in liabilities. 

Share based compensation 

IFRS requires recognition of compensation expense for share based compensation to be based on fair values 
rather  than  implicit  values,  determined  through  the  use  of  Black-Scholes  and  other  option  modeling 
techniques.  As a result, the Company expects to increase the current portion recorded in Accounts payable 
and accrued liabilities by $0.4 million and the long term portion in Other long-term liabilities by $0.5 million 
as at January 1, 2010 under IFRS. 

     
 
31 

Future income taxes 

As a result of the aforementioned adjustments, future income taxes on the Balance Sheet as at January 1, 
2010 are expected to be reduced by $0.3 million under IFRS.   

Presentation of financial statements 

There  are  a  number  of  presentation  changes  and  reclassifications  amongst  line  items  on  the  financial 
statements that are expected under IFRS.  In addition, IFRS requires significantly more financial statement 
note disclosure than required under Canadian GAAP standards.  These will be fully disclosed in our March 31, 
2011 quarter-end financial statements. 

The impact of the changeover from Canadian GAAP to IFRS is expected to be as follows¹: 

Balance as at January 1, 2010 under Canadian GAAP 

Transition election to fair value property at Hammond sawmill site 
Employee future benefits adjustments to reflect unamortized actuarial gains (losses) 
Increase in decommissioning liabilities resulting from change to credit-free discount rate 
Increase in share based compensation liability to reflect fair values 
Reduction in future income taxes liability arising from aforementioned adjustments 

Accumulated 

other 

comprehensive 

loss 

Retained 
earnings 

$ 

(millions of dollars) 
88.9 

$ 

(24.9) 

15.7 
(8.0) 
(2.8) 
(0.9) 
0.3 
4.4 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

Transition election to set cumulative translation adjustments to zero 

(24.9) 

24.9 

Balance as at January 1, 2010 under IFRS 

$ 

68.4 

$ 

- 

¹ Table may not add due to rounding 

Since  the  impacts  of  conversion  to  IFRS  standards  are  still  in  process  of  being  finalized  and  audited,  it  is 
possible  that  further  differences  may  arise  that  could  have  a  significant  impact  on  the  Company’s  financial 
statements under IFRS.  Interfor expects to meet all filing requirements and deadlines for its first reporting 
under IFRS for the March 31, 2011 quarter-end. 

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES   

Pricing 

Interfor’s operating results are affected by fluctuations in the selling prices for lumber, logs and wood chips.  
Product selling prices are, in turn, affected by such factors as the general level of economic activity in the 
markets in which Interfor sells its products, interest rates, construction activity (in particular, housing starts 
in the  United  States, Canada, Japan and China), and log and  chip supply/demand relationships.  Interfor’s 
financial results may be significantly affected by changes in the selling prices of its products.  Based on 2010 
levels of operations, a $10 change in the Company’s average selling price of its products would impact net 
earnings as follows: 

Lumber  

$10 increase per thousand fbm   

$8.5 million increase in net income 

Chips 

$10 increase per unit1 

$4.2 million increase in net income 

  Interfor sells chips in either volumetric units (VU’s or GPU’s - B.C. Coastal operations) or bone dry units (BDU’s - B.C. Interior and 

1 
Pacific Northwest operations). 

Competition 

The  markets  for  the  Company’s  products  are  highly  competitive  on  a  global  basis  and  producers  compete 
primarily  on  the  basis  of  price.    In  addition,  a  majority  of  Interfor’s  lumber  production  is  sold  in  markets 
where  Interfor  competes  against  many  producers  of  approximately  the  same  or  larger  capacity.    Some  of 

     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interfor’s  competitors  have  greater  financial  resources  than  the  Company  and  a  number  are,  in  certain 
product lines, lower cost producers than Interfor. 

Factors which affect the Company’s competitive position include: 

32 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the foreign exchange rate; 

the cost of labour; 

the costs of harvesting or purchasing logs; 

the quality of its products and customer service;  

the ability to secure space on vessels for overseas shipments and on trucks and railcars for North 
American shipments; 

the cost of export taxes payable on sales to the U.S.; and 

its ability to maintain high operating rates and thus lower manufacturing costs. 

If the Company is unable to successfully compete on a global basis, its financial condition could suffer. 

Availability of Log Supply  

The log requirements of Interfor’s mills are met using logs harvested from its timber tenures, by long-term 
trade and purchase agreements and by purchases on the  open market.   Logs  produced but  unsuitable  for 
use in Interfor’s mills are either traded for suitable logs or sold on the open market.  Operating at normal 
capacity,  the  Company’s  Canadian  mills  generally  purchase  less  than  50%  of  their  log  requirements  either 
through  purchase  agreements  or  on  the  open  market.    The  Company  relies  almost  entirely  on  purchased 
fibre for its U.S. based mills, with some logs for the sawmills located on the Olympic Peninsula provided by 
the  Company’s  Canadian  coastal  logging  operations.    As  a  result,  fluctuations  in  the  price,  quality  or 
availability  of  log  supply  can  have  a  material  effect  on  Interfor’s  business,  financial  position,  results  of 
operations and cash flow. 

Additionally,  in  order  to  ensure  uninterrupted  access  to  logs  harvested  from  its  timber  tenures  in  Canada, 
Interfor must also focus on the continuous development of road networks.  This encompasses an integrated 
plan by foresters, engineers and logging operations personnel to identify future  logging areas and develop 
the  engineering  for  roads.    Interfor  expects  to  fund  its  ongoing  road  development  through  the  cash 
generated from operations and through utilization of its existing bank facilities.    

Use of Financial and Other Instruments  

From  time  to  time,  the  Company  employs  financial  instruments,  such  as  interest  rate  swaps  and  foreign 
currency  forward  and  option  contracts,  to  manage  exposure  to  fluctuations  in  interest  rates  and  foreign 
exchange rates.  The Company’s policy is not to use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.  The risk 
management strategies and relationships are formally documented and assessed on a regular, ongoing basis 
to ensure derivatives are effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. 

The  counter-parties  for  all  derivative  contracts  are  the  Company’s  Canadian  bankers  who  are  highly-rated 
and, hence, the risk of credit loss on the instruments is mitigated. 

Currency Exchange Sensitivity 

The Company’s Canadian operations ordinarily sell approximately 75% of their lumber into export markets, 
with the majority of these sales denominated in foreign currency, predominantly US$ and a small amount in 
Japanese  Yen.    While  the  Canadian  operations  also  incur  some  US$  denominated  expenses,  primarily  for 
ocean  freight  and  other  transportation,  and  equipment  operating  leases,  the  majority  of  expenses  are 
incurred in CAD$.   

An  increase  in  the  value  of  the  CAD$  relative  to  the  US$  would  reduce  the  amount  of  revenue  in  CAD$ 
realized  by  the  Company  from  lumber  sales  made  in  US$.    This  would  reduce  the  Company’s  operating 
margin and the cash flow available to fund operations.   As a result, any such increase in the value of the 
CAD$  relative  to  the  US$  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  business,  financial 
condition, results of operations and cash flows. 

     
 
33 

The  Company  actively  manages  its  currency  exchange  risk  for  fluctuations  in  US$  and  Japanese  Yen  by 
identifying opportunities from time to time to enter into foreign exchange contracts to effectively hedge its 
net  exposure.    As  at  December  31,  2010,  the  Company  has  outstanding  obligations  to  sell  a  maximum  of 
US$22.5  million  at  an  average  rate  of  CAD$1.0168  to  the  USD$1.00  and  sell  Japanese  ¥75.0  million  at  an 
average rate of ¥83.03 to the US$1.00 during 2011.   All foreign currency  gains  or losses to December 31, 
2010  have  been  recognized  in  the  Statement  of  Operations  and  the  fair  value  of  the  foreign  currency 
contracts  has  been  recorded  as  an  asset  of  $0.5  million  in  accounts  receivable  and  a  negligible  liability  in 
accounts payable (2009 - $0.4 million asset fair value recorded in accounts receivable). 

Based  on  the  Company’s  net  exposure  to  foreign  currencies  and  related  financial  instruments  in  2010,  the 
sensitivity of Interfor’s net earnings is as follows: 

US$ 

$0.01 increase vs. CAD$  

$1.3 million increase in net income 

Japanese Yen  1¥ increase vs. US$ 

$0.1 mllion increase in net income 

Until 2010, Interfor’s U.S. operations produced and sold products almost exclusively for the U.S. market, but 
with the poor U.S. housing starts and increased demand from China and other overseas markets there has 
been some sizable growth in export sales in 2010.  All revenues and expenses are denominated in US$.  All 
foreign  currency  denominated  assets  and  liabilities  of  the  self-sustaining  operations  are  translated  at 
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date.   Revenues and expenses are translated at the average 
rates for the period.  Unrealized gains and losses arising upon translation of net foreign currency investment 
positions  in  self-sustaining  operations,  together  with  any  gain  or  losses  arising  from  hedges  of  those  net 
investment  positions  to  the  extent  effective,  are  credited  or  charged  to  net  change  in  unrealized  foreign 
currency  translation  gains  (losses)  in  the  Statement  of  Comprehensive  Income.    Upon  sale,  reduction  or 
substantial  liquidation  of  an  investment  position,  the  previously  recorded  net  unrealized  gains  (losses) 
thereon  in  Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive  Income  (“AOCI”)  are  reclassified  to  the  Statement  of 
Operations. 

The Company recorded a $7.6 million an unrealized foreign exchange loss on translation of its self-sustaining 
operations in 2010 (2009 - $24.3 million loss) to Other comprehensive income (loss).   

On October 1, 2008, the Company designated the US$30.2 million drawn under its Revolving Term Line for 
the  acquisition  of  its  Beaver  operations  as  a  hedge  against  its  investment  in  its  self-sustaining  U.S. 
operations.  Unrealized foreign exchange gains of $1.7 million (2009 - $5.0 million gain) have been recorded 
in Other comprehensive income (loss) in 2010.   

The Company had previously designated its US$35.0 million Non-Revolving Term Line as a hedge against its 
investment  in  its  self-sustaining  U.S.  operations.    Effective  April  1,  2007,  the  Company  terminated  the 
designation  of  the  hedging  relationship  and  discontinued  its  hedge  accounting.    Previously  recognized 
unrealized foreign exchange gains as a result of applying hedge accounting totaled $5.5 million and continue 
to be recorded in AOCI.   

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010, the Company drew US$35.0 
million ($35.8 million) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled its U.S. dollar non-revolving term 
line  (the  “Non-Revolving  Term  Line”).    Upon  repayment  of  the  loan,  the  foreign  exchange  gain  of  $1.0 
million  realized  on  repayment  of  the  Non-Revolving  Term  Line  was  recognized  in  Other  foreign  exchange 
gain (loss) on the Statement of Operations.   

The Company subsequently drew a further $36.7 million and repaid the drawings of US$35.0 million used to 
repay the Non-Revolving Term Line, realizing a foreign exchange loss of $0.9 million which was recognized 
in Other foreign exchange gain (loss) on the Statement of Operations.   

Cost of Debt Financing and Sensitivity 

As at December 31, 2010 Interfor had drawn a total of $160.8 million (2009 - $149.5 million) of floating rate 
debt under its operating and term credit facilities, including letters of credit. 

The Company’s operating and term credit facilities bear interest at the bank prime rate plus a premium, or, 
at the Company's option, at rates for Bankers' Acceptances for CAD$ loans or at LIBOR for US$ loans, in all 
cases  depending  upon  a  financial  ratio.    The  lines  are  subject  to  certain  financial  covenants  including  a 

     
 
 
 
34 

minimum working capital requirement, a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization, and a minimum 
net worth requirement.   

During  September  2005,  the  Company  entered  into  a  cross  currency  interest  rate  swap.    The  Company 
received  US$20.0  million  at  maturity  on  September  1,  2009  in  exchange  for  payment  of  CAD$23.5  million 
(an exchange rate of 1.1765).  In addition, during the term of the swap the Company paid an amount based 
on annual interest of 5.84% on the CAD$23.5 million and received 90 day LIBOR plus a spread of 200 basis 
points  on  the  US$20.0  million,  with  LIBOR  recalculated  at  set  interval  dates.    The  swap  matured  on 
September 1, 2009 and total foreign exchange losses of $2.1 million were recognized in 2009.  

Based  on  the  Company’s  average  debt  level  during  2010,  the  sensitivity  of  a  100  basis  point  increase  in 
interest rates would result in an approximate decrease of $1.1 million in net earnings. 

Regulatory Issues  

Interfor’s  operations  are  subject  to  extensive  provincial,  state,  federal  or  other  laws  and  regulations  that 
apply to most aspects of our business activities. Where applicable, Interfor is required to obtain approvals, 
permits and licences for its operations as a condition to operate. 

From  time  to  time  the  changes  in  government  policy  or  regulation  may  impact  the  company’s  operations. 
Until the details of all such changes are announced and implemented, the full impact of these changes on 
the Company’s production, costs, financial position and results of operations cannot be determined. 

Allowable Annual Cut (“AAC”) 

Interfor holds cutting rights in B.C. that represent an AAC of approximately of 3.7 million cubic metres.  Of 
this amount 3.5 million cubic metres is in the form of replaceable tenures.  The remaining portion is held in 
non-replaceable tenures (timber Licences and non-replaceable forest licences) that will expire over time. 

The AAC is regulated by the Ministry of Forests and Range and subject to periodic reviews that assess and 
then  make  determinations  to  set  harvesting  rates  for  each  tenure.    Many  factors  affect  the  AAC  such  as 
timber inventory, operable land base, growth rates, regulations, forest  health, land use and environmental 
and social considerations.   

Reductions in Interfor’s AAC from any new protected areas are subject to compensation, once these areas 
have been formally removed.  Currently there are no compensation claims outstanding.    

The amount of timber available for harvest in the B.C. Southern Interior is expected to remain high for the 
next  five  years  as  a  consequence  of  an  accelerated  harvest  to  address  the  impact  from  the  pine  beetle 
epidemic.  The overall timber supply is expected to be reduced in the BC interior once the surplus of dead 
pine is no longer useable.  The amount and duration of the AAC increase and subsequent decline will vary by 
location.   

Aboriginal Issues  

Aboriginal  groups  have  claimed  aboriginal  title  and  rights  over  substantial  portions  of  British  Columbia, 
including  areas  where  Interfor’s  forest  tenures  are  situated,  creating  uncertainty  as  to  the  status  of 
competing  property  rights.    The  Federal  and  Provincial  governments  have  been  seeking  to  negotiate 
settlements with aboriginal groups throughout British Columbia in order to resolve aboriginal rights and title 
claims.    In  addition,  the  governments  have  entered,  and  may  continue  to  enter,  into  interim  measures 
agreements with aboriginal groups.  Any interim measures agreements or settlements that may result from 
the treaty process may involve a combination of cash, resources, grants of conditional rights to resources on 
public  lands  and  rights  of  self  government.    The  impact  of  aboriginal  claims  or  treaty  settlements  on 
Interfor’s  forest  tenures  or  the  amounts  of  compensation  to  Interfor,  if  any,  cannot  be  estimated  at  this 
time. 

The  courts  have  also  established  that  the  Crown  has  a  duty  to  consult  with  aboriginal  groups  and  where 
appropriate  accommodate  aboriginal  interests.  However,  questions  of  responsibility  and  appropriateness  of 
balancing interests will continue to evolve as the parties try to address these long standing complex issues.  
In British Columbia the Province has initiated a New Relationship process with First Nations that is intended 
to improve the functional relationship between the Crown and aboriginal groups prior to treaty settlement.  

     
 
35 

In  late  2009  the  Province  and  six  Coastal  First  Nations  signed  a  Reconciliation  Protocol  that  provides  a 
shared decision making process for resource and land use, as well as new forest sector opportunities.  This 
agreement  overlaps  a  portion  of  Interfor’s  Central  Coast  tenures.    The  agreement  will  be  assessed  and 
monitored in the years ahead to determine the extent of any implications on those operations. 

Stumpage Fees  

Stumpage  is  the  fee  the  Crown  charges  companies  to  harvest  timber  from  Crown  land.        Stumpage 
payments  for  a  harvesting  area  is  based  on  a  competitive  market  pricing  system  (MPS)  that  has  been 
established for both the coast and interior regions of BC. 

Amending  the  stumpage  system  is  complex  and  the  subject  of  discussion  involving,  among  other  things, 
lumber trade agreements between Canada and the United States.  The primary variable in MPS is log pricing 
established through open market bidding for standing timber.  In addition to bid prices, there are a number 
of  operational  and  administrative  factors  that  go  into  determining  an  individual  stumpage  rate  for  each 
cutting permit.  

On  July  1,  2010  The  Ministry  of  Forests  and  Range  implemented  changes  to  the  interior  market  pricing 
system in response to the Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) epidemic. These changes included the introduction of 
stand as a whole pricing with cruise based billing for MPB damaged timber. The impact of these changes is 
to  increase  the  overall  market  sensitivity  to  pricing  of  MPB  damaged  timber.  These  changes  in  the  pricing 
system are consistent with Canada’s obligation under the 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement (“SLA”). 

On  October  8,  2010,  the  U.S.  Department  of  Commerce  informed  Canada  that  it  was  requesting 
consultations under the SLA agreement with respect to current and past pricing of MPB damaged timber. As 
of December 31, 2010 the consultation period was still in effect.  On January 18, 2011 the U.S. government 
filed for arbitration under the terms of the SLA, with the arbitration to be conducted by the London Court of 
International Arbitration as required by the SLA. Decisions by the LCIA are final and binding on both parties.  
As the U.S. arbitration request is still in preliminary stages the existence of any potential claim has not been 
determined and no provision has been recorded in the financial statements as at December 31, 2010. 

Periodic changes in the British Columbia government’s administrative policy can affect the market price for 
timber and the viability of individual logging operations.  There can be no assurance that current changes or 
future changes will not have a material impact on stumpage rates.   

Environment  

Interfor has incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to minimize environmental impact, prevent pollution 
and  for  continuous  improvement  of  its  environmental  performance.    Interfor  may  discover  currently 
unknown environmental problems or conditions relating to its past or present operations, or it may be faced 
with  unforeseen  environmental  liability  in  the  future.    This  may  require  site  or  other  remediation  costs  to 
maintain compliance or correct violations of environmental laws and regulations or result in governmental or 
private  claims  for  damage  to  person,  property  or  the  environment,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse 
effect on Interfor’s financial condition and results of operations. 

Labour Disruptions  

The  Company’s  Acorn,  Hammond,  Grand  Forks,  and  Castlegar  sawmill  employees  are  members  of  the 
Canadian  USW  union.    The  collective  agreement  with  the  Southern  Interior  USW  agreement  (Grand  Forks 
and  Castlegar)  expired  on  June  30,  2009  while  the  USW  agreement  for  the  B.C.  Coast  (Acorn  and 
Hammond)  expired  on  June  14,  2010.    The  Company  also  has  16  employees  in  the  B.C.  Interior  who  are 
members of the Canadian Marine Service Guild, and their collective agreement expires September 30, 2011.  
Negotiations  with  the  USW  regarding  renewal  of  the  expired  agreements  are  ongoing,  with  employees 
continuing to work under the terms of the expired agreement with no workplace disruptions. 

Production  disruptions  resulting  from  walkouts  or  strikes  by  unionized  employees  could  result  in  lost 
production  and  sales,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  impact  on  the  Company’s  business.    The 
Company believes that its current labour relations are stable and does not anticipate any related disruptions 
to its operations in the foreseeable future.   

     
 
36 

OUTLOOK 

Business conditions remain uncertain.   The  North American market  has softened in recent weeks as  harsh 
weather has impacted building activity in a number of regions.  Sales to China and other offshore markets 
continue to positively impact pricing in North America.  Cedar remains soft; Japan is stable. 

The Canadian dollar is expected to remain relatively stable in 2011, hovering near parity relative to its U.S. 
counterpart throughout the year. 

The Company will continue to diversify its lumber markets to reduce its reliance on the U.S.   

Interfor is continuing to move ahead with its high return capital program.  So far, a total of $4.3 million has 
been  spent  and  a  number  of  projects  are  scheduled  for  completion  in  the  first  six  months  of  2011.    Total 
capital spending in the first quarter of 2011 is expected to be in the range of $10 million; spending for the 
year is projected at $45 - $47 million. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Additional  information  relating  to  the  Company  and  its  operations  can  be  found  on  its  website  at 
www.interfor.com and in the Annual Information Form and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  Interfor’s trading 
symbol on the Toronto Stock Exchange is IFP.A. 

     
 
37 

International Forest Products Limited 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

The management of International Forest Products Limited (Interfor) is responsible for preparing 

the  accompanying  consolidated  financial  statements.  The  financial  statements  were  prepared  in 

accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and are necessarily based in part 

on  management’s  best  estimates  and  judgements.  The  financial  information  included  elsewhere  (in 

the Statutory Reports) is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements. 

Interfor maintains a system of internal accounting control which management believes provides 

reasonable  assurance  that  financial  records  are  reliable  and  form  a  proper  basis  for  preparation  of 

financial statements. The internal accounting control process includes communications to employees 

of Interfor’s standards for ethical business conduct. 

The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfills its responsibilities for 

financial  reporting  and  internal  controls.  The  Board  exercises  this  responsibility  through  its  Audit 

Committee,  the  members  of  which  are  neither  officers  nor  employees  of  Interfor.  The  Committee 

meets periodically with management and the independent Auditors to satisfy itself that each group is 

properly  discharging  its  responsibilities  and  to  review  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  the 

independent  Auditors’  report.  The  Company’s  Auditors  have  full  and  free  access  to  the  Audit 

Committee.  The  Audit  Committee  reports  its  findings  to  the  Board  of  Directors  for  consideration  in 

approving the consolidated financial statements for issuance to the shareholders. The Committee also 

makes  recommendations  to  the  Board  with  respect  to  the  appointment  and  remuneration  of  the 

Auditors. 

The consolidated financial statements have been examined by the independent Auditors, KPMG 

LLP and their report follows. 

Duncan K. Davies 

John A. Horning 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Senior Vice President, Chief  Financial Officer and 
Corporate Secretary 

February 9, 2011 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT 

38 

To the Shareholders 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of International Forest Products 

Limited, which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 

2009,  the  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  retained  earnings,  cashflows,  and  comprehensive 

income  (loss)  and  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  for  the  years  then    ended,  and 

notes, comprising  a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. 

Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Management  is  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  these  consolidated  financial 

statements  in  accordance  with  Canadian  generally  accepted  accounting  principles,  and  for  such 

internal  control  as  management  determines  is  necessary  to  enable  the  preparation  of  consolidated 

financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. 

Auditors’ Responsibility 

Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these  consolidated  financial  statements  based  on  our 

audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. 

Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to 

obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  consolidated  financial  statements  are  free  from 

material misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures 

in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including 

the  assessment  of  the  risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  consolidated  financial  statements, 

whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk  assessments,  we  consider  internal  control 

relevant  to  the  entity’s  preparation  and  fair  presentation  of the  consolidated financial statements in 

order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of 

expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  entity's  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes 

evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting 

estimates  made  by  management,  as  well  as  evaluating  the  overall  presentation  of  the  consolidated 

financial statements. 

 
We  believe  that  the  audit  evidence  we  have  obtained  in  our  audits  is  sufficient  and  appropriate  to 

39 

provide a basis for our audit opinions. 

Opinion 

In  our  opinion,  the  consolidated  financial  statements  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the 

financial position of International Forest Products Limited as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 

2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with 

Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. 

KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants 

Vancouver, Canada 

February 9, 2011 

 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars) 
December 31, 2010 and 2009 

40 

Assets 
Current assets: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Accounts receivable 
Income taxes recoverable 
Inventories (note 3) 
Prepaid expenses 
Future income taxes (note 14) 

Investments and other assets (note 4) 
Property, plant and equipment (note 5) 
Logging roads and bridges (note 6) 
Timber tenures (note 6) 
Goodwill 
Long-lived assets held for sale (note 2) 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity 
Current liabilities: 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Income taxes payable 
Payable to investee company (notes 8 and 22(a)) 

Reforestation liability, net of current portion (note 10) 
Long-term debt (note 7(b)) 
Other long-term liabilities (note 9) 
Future income taxes (note 14) 

Shareholders' equity: 

Share capital (note 11): 

Issued and fully paid: 

Class A subordinate voting shares 
Class B common shares 
Contributed surplus (note 11(a)) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss 
Retained earnings 

2010 

2009 

$ 

9,301 
45,961 
- 
71,762 
8,334 
3,627 
138,985 

28,618 
333,989 
     17,063 
80,154 
13,078 
- 

$ 

3,802 
32,951 
230 
60,159 
7,777 
2,974 
107,893 

17,060 
357,501 
16,485 
67,010 
13,078 
3,424 

$  611,887 

$  582,451 

$  58,267 
230 
15,738 
74,235 

15,017 
156,037 
15,695 
3,627 

$ 

43,510 
- 
3,096 
46,606 

14,724 
144,525 
15,316 
3,286 

285,362 
4,080 
5,408 
(32,501) 
84,927 
347,276 

284,500 
4,080 
5,408 
(24,855) 
88,861 
357,994 

$  611,887 

$  582,451 

Commitments and contingencies (note 15) 
Subsequent events (notes 1(e), 8, 15(c) and 22) 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

Approved on behalf of the Board: 

E.L. Sauder, Director                                 

G.H. MacDougall, Director 

 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
                   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
   
 
  
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 
Consolidated Statements of Operations 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except earnings per share amounts) 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 

41 

2010 

2009 

Sales 

$  625,618 

$  389,775 

Costs and expenses: 
Production 
Selling and administration 
Long term incentive compensation 
Export taxes 
Amortization of plant and equipment 
Depletion and amortization of timber, roads and other 

Operating loss before restructuring costs 
and write-downs of plant, equipment 

Restructuring costs and write-downs of plant and  

and equipment (note 13) 

Operating loss 

Other earnings (expenses): 

Interest expense on long-term debt 
Other interest expense 
Other foreign exchange gain (loss) 
Other income (expense) (note 12) 
Equity in earnings of investee companies (note 4) 

Loss before income taxes 

Income taxes (note 14): 

Current (recovery) 
Future (recovery) 

Net loss 

Net loss per share (note 16): 

Basic and diluted 

557,122 
17,508 
1,873 
7,427 
28,117 
19,008 
631,055 

374,488 
16,445 
3,211 
3,903 
24,838 
13,340 
436,225 

(5,437) 

(46,450) 

(1,578) 

(7,015) 

(7,944) 
(581) 
(280) 
(25) 
11,446 
2,616 

(4,399) 

60 
(525) 
(465) 

(4,367) 

(50,817) 

(6,442) 
(1,401) 
37 
22,965 
1,885 
17,044 

(33,773) 

(183) 
(9,703) 
(9,886) 

$ 

(3,934) 

$ 

(23,887) 

$ 

(0.08) 

$ 

(0.51) 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars) 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 

Retained earnings, beginning of year 
Net loss 

Retained earnings, end of year 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2010 

2009 

$  88,861 
(3,934) 

$  112,748 
(23,887) 

$  84,927 

$ 

88,861 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars) 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 

42 

Cash provided by (used in): 
Operating activities: 

Net loss  
Items not involving cash: 

Amortization of plant and equipment 
Depletion and amortization of timber, roads and other 
Future income taxes (recovery) 
Other assets 
Reforestation liability 
Other long-term liabilities 
Equity in earnings of investee company (note 4) 
Write-down of plant, equipment, and roads 
Unrealized foreign exchange gains 
Other expense (income) (note 12) 

Cash generated from (used in) operating working capital: 

Accounts receivable 
Inventories 
Prepaid expenses 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Income taxes 

Investing activities: 

Additions to property, plant and equipment 
Additions to logging roads and timber 
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment (note 12) 
Investments and other assets 

Financing activities: 

Issuance of share capital, net of expenses (note 11(a)) 
Decrease in bank indebtedness 
Funds from promissory note payable to investee company (note 8) 
Additions to long-term debt (note 7(b)) 
Repayments of long-term debt (note 7(b)) 

Foreign exchange loss on cash and cash equivalents held  

in a foreign currency 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 

Supplementary disclosures: 
Cash interest paid, net 
Cash income taxes received 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2010 

2009 

$ 

(3,934) 

$ 

(23,887) 

28,117 
19,008 
(525) 
(5) 
(449) 
456 
(11,446) 
809 
(71) 
25 
31,985 

(13,460) 
(12,421) 
(744) 
15,169 
456 
20,985 

(10,912) 
(31,398) 
1,325 
(4,383) 
(45,368) 

862 
- 
15,738 
125,819 
(112,534) 
29,885 

(3) 
5,499 
3,802 
9,301 

8,525 
397 

$ 

$ 

24,838 
13,340 
(9,703) 
759 
(961) 
2,909  
(1,885) 
3,067 
(6,969) 
 (23,089) 
(21,581) 

(8,580) 
16,882 
(625) 
2,702 
15,976 
4,774 

(20,781) 
(6,811) 
36,985 
(942) 
8,451 

- 
(30,589) 
3,096 
59,000 
(41,000) 
(9,493) 

(114) 
3,618 
184 
3,802 

7,843 
16,179 

$ 

$ 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
   
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars) 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 

43 

Net loss 

Other comprehensive loss: 

Net change in unrealized foreign currency 
translation losses on translation of 
self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries 

Other comprehensive loss 

Comprehensive loss 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2010 

2009 

$ 

(3,934) 

$  (23,887) 

(7,646) 
(7,646) 

(24,301) 
(24,301) 

$  (11,580) 

$ 

(48,188) 

Consolidated Statements of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars) 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss,  

beginning of year 
Other comprehensive loss 

2010 

2009 

$  (24,855) 
(7,646) 

$ 

(554) 
(24,301) 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, end of year 

$  (32,501) 

$ 

(24,855) 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

44 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies: 

International  Forest  Products  Limited  (the  “Company”  or  “Intefor”)  is  incorporated  under  the 
Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) and its primary business activity is the production of 
wood products in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest for sale to markets around the 
world. 

(a)  Principles of consolidation: 

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly 
owned  subsidiaries  from  their  respective  dates  of  acquisition  or  incorporation.    All 
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.  

(b)  Adoption of changes in accounting policies: 

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted three new Canadian Institute of Chartered 
Accountants (“CICA”) accounting standards: 

(i)  CICA  Handbook  Section  1582,  Business Combinations  which  replaces  CICA  Handbook 
Section  1581,  Business  Combinations,  and  establishes  revised  standards  for  the 
recognition,  measurement,  presentation  and  disclosure  of  business  acquisitions  and 
aligns Canadian GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).   

(ii)  CICA  Handbook  Section  1601,  Consolidated Financial Statements  and  CICA  Handbook 
Section  1602,  Non-Controlling Interests,  which  replace  CICA  Handbook  Section  1600, 
Consolidated Financial Statements, and establish revised standards for the preparation of 
consolidated financial statements.  

Adoption of these standards has no impact on the consolidated financial statements. 

(c)  Cash and cash equivalents: 

Cash consists of cash on deposit and short-term interest bearing securities with maturities at 
their purchase date of three months or less. 

(d)  Inventories: 

Lumber  inventories  are  valued  at  the  lower  of  cost  and  net  realizable  value  on  a  specific 
product basis.  Cost is determined as the weighted average of cost of production on a three 
month  rolling  average,  lagged  by  one  month  and  adjusted  for  exceptional  costs,  as  in  the 
case of a curtailment.   

Log  inventories  are  valued  at  the  lower  of  cost  and  net  realizable  value on a specific boom 
basis  where  logs  are  in  boom  form,  or  in  aggregate  on  a  species  and  sort  basis  where  the 
logs do not exist in boom form.  Cost for internally produced log inventories is determined as 
the  weighted  average  cost  of  logging  on  a  twelve  month  rolling  average  on  the  B.C.  Coast 
and on a three month rolling average in the B.C. Interior.  For both areas, costs are lagged by 
one  month  and  adjusted  for  exceptional  costs,  as  in  the  case  of  a  curtailment.    Log 
inventories  purchased  from  external  sources  are  costed  at  acquisition  cost.    Net  realizable 
value of logs is based on either replacement cost or, for logs for which have been committed 
to  processing  into  lumber,  on  estimated  net  realizable  value  after  taking  into  consideration 
costs of completion and sale. 

Other  inventories  consist  primarily  of  supplies  which  are  recorded  at  lower  of  cost  and 
replacement cost. 

(e)  Investments and advances: 

Investments over which the Company is able to exert significant influence are accounted for 
on the equity basis.  Advances are accounted for at amortized cost.  

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

45 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies (continued): 

(e)  Investments and advances (continued): 

The  Company  has  been  the  holder  of  60%  of  the outstanding common shares of Seaboard 
Shipping  Company  Ltd.  (“Seaboard”).    The  remaining  common  shares  have  been  held  by 
other British Columbia forestry companies.  Seaboard’s subsidiary company operates ocean-
going  vessels  that  provide  service  to  world  ports  with  contractual  commitments  for  lumber 
and plywood volumes, as well as other cargo.  Although the Company owns over 50% of the 
common  shares  of  Seaboard,  the  shareholders  have  entered  into  agreements  that  limit  the 
Company’s  ability  to  control  Seaboard’s  strategic  decisions.    In  addition,  net  earnings  of 
Seaboard are distributed based on a percentage of shipments of product by the shareholders 
and not based on common share ownership. 

The  Company  accounts  for  its  investment  in  Seaboard  using  the  equity  method  with  the 
investment  adjusted  for  earnings  of  Seaboard  based  on  the  Company’s  percentage  of 
earnings  as  determined  based  on  its  shipment  percentage  and  decreased  for  distributions 
made by Seaboard.   

Effective  January  5,  2011,  there  was  a  restructuring  of  Seaboard  such  that  the  Company 
became sole owner of Seaboard after all other partners withdrew.  (See Subsequent events - 
note 22(b)). 

(f)  Property, plant and equipment and timber tenures and logging roads and bridges: 

Property,  plant  and  equipment  and  timber  tenures  and  logging  roads  and  bridges  are 
recorded  at  cost.    Amortization  on  plant  and  equipment  is  provided  on  a  straight-line  basis 
during  periods  of  production  at  rates  (ranging  from  2.5%  to  25%)  based  on  the  estimated 
useful  lives  of  the  assets.    Timber  licence  depletion  and  road  and  bridge  amortization  are 
computed  on  the  basis  of  timber  cut  relative  to  available  timber.    Tree  farm  and  forest 
licences are depleted on a straight-line basis over 40 years.  Amortization rates are reviewed 
periodically  to  ensure they are aligned with estimates of remaining economic useful lives of 
the associated capital assets. 

(g)  Reforestation liability: 

Forestry legislation in British Columbia requires the Company to incur the cost of reforestation 
on its forest, timber and tree farm licences.  Accordingly, the Company records the fair value 
of the costs of reforestation in the period in which the timber is cut, with the fair value of the 
liability  determined  with  reference  to  the  present  value  of  estimated  future  cash  flows.    In 
periods  subsequent  to  the  initial  measurement,  changes  in  the  liability  resulting  from  the 
passage  of  time  and  revisions  to  fair  value  calculations  are  recognized  in  the  statement  of 
operations as they occur.  These costs are included in the cost of current production. 

(h)  Environmental costs: 

Environmental  expenditures  are  expensed  or  capitalized  depending  upon  their  future 
economic  benefit.    Expenditures  that  prevent  future  environmental  contamination  are 
capitalized as plant and equipment.  Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused 
by past operations are expensed.  Liabilities are recorded when rehabilitation efforts are likely 
to occur and the costs can be reasonably estimated. 

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

46 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies (continued): 

 (i)  Use of estimates: 

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  Canadian  generally  accepted 
accounting  principles  requires  management  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect 
the  reported  amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure  of  contingent  assets  and 
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and 
expenses  during  the  reporting  period.    Significant  areas  requiring  the  use  of  management 
estimates  relate  to  the  determination  of  restructuring,  reforestation,  road  deactivation, 
environmental  and  tax  obligations,  recoverability  of  assets,  rates  for  depletion  and 
amortization,  and  determination  of  fair  values  of  assets  and  liabilities  acquired  in  business 
combinations.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

(j)  Income taxes: 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method.  Future tax assets and 
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between 
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective 
tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.  Future tax assets and liabilities 
are  measured  using  substantively  enacted  tax  rates  expected to apply to taxable income in 
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The 
effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in 
the period that includes the substantive enactment date.  When the realization of future tax 
assets is not considered to be more likely than not, a valuation allowance is provided.  

(k)  Share-based compensation: 

The  Company  has  share  option  plans  and  other  share-based  compensation  plans  for 
directors, officers and certain other eligible employees. 

The  Company  follows  the  fair  value  method  of  accounting  for  share  options  granted  to 
directors,  officers  and  employees.    Under  the  fair  value  method,  compensation  expense  is 
recorded for share options over the vesting period based on the estimated fair market value 
of the option at the date of grant.  

For  other  share  based  compensation  plans  which  are based on changes in the value of the 
Company’s share price, the Company records a liability and recognizes an expense (recovery) 
for  changes  in  the  estimated  compensation  over  the  vesting  period  based  on  the  quoted 
market price of the Company’s shares over the strike price of the grant. 

(l)  Sales recognition and presentation policies: 

The  Company  recognizes  sales  to  external  customers  when  the product is shipped and title 
passes.    Sales  are  recorded  on  a  gross  basis,  before  freight,  wharfage  and  handling  costs, 
and export taxes. 

(m) Employee future benefits: 

The estimated costs for defined benefit pensions and other post-retirement benefits provided 
to  employees  by  the  Company  are  accrued  using  actuarial  methods  and  assumptions, 
including  Management’s  best  estimates  of  the  discount  rate,  future  investment  earnings, 
salary escalation, and health care costs. 

The  actuarial  liability,  and  the  associated  annual  cost  of  accruing  benefits  for  the  defined 
benefit  pension  plans  and  other  post-retirement  benefits  is  calculated  using  the  projected 
accrued benefit cost method pro-rated on service.  

For the purpose of calculating the expected return on plan assets, those assets are valued at 
fair value. 

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

47 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies (continued): 

(m) Employee future benefits (continued): 

Actuarial gains and losses arise from actual experience being different from the assumptions, 
or changes in actuarial assumptions used to determine the actuarial liability.  

The unamortized net actuarial gains or losses in excess of ten percent of the greater of the 
benefit obligation and the fair value of the plan assets are amortized on a straight-line basis 
over  the  average  remaining  service  period  of  active  employees.  The  average  remaining 
service period of the active employees covered by the plans is twelve years in 2010 (2009 - 
thirteen years).  

(n)  Hedging relationships and accounting for derivative financial instruments: 

The Company at times uses derivative financial instruments for economic hedging purposes in 
the  management  of  foreign  currency  and  interest  rate  exposures.    The  Company’s  policy  is 
not to use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.  The risk management strategies 
and  relationships  are  formally  documented  and  assessed  on  a  regular,  on-going  basis  to 
ensure  the  derivatives  are  effective  in  offsetting  changes  in  fair  values  or  cash  flows  of 
hedged  items.    Foreign  exchange  exposure  to  foreign  currency  receipts  and  related 
receivables, primarily U.S. currency, is managed through the use of foreign exchange forward 
contracts and options.   

Exposure to interest rates on a component of long-term debt was managed through the use 
of a cross currency interest rate swap.  This swap agreement required the periodic exchange 
of payments without the exchange of the notional principal amount on which the payments 
are  based.    Foreign  exchange  adjustments  accounted  for  under  the  cross  currency  interest 
rate  swap  agreement  were  recognized  in  Other  foreign  exchange  gain  (loss)  on  the 
Statement  of  Operations.    The  cross  currency  interest  rate  swap  matured  on  September  1, 
2009. 

The Company has chosen not to designate its derivative forward foreign exchange contracts, 
options  and  interest  rate  swap  as  hedges.    Consequently,  derivatives  for  which  hedge 
accounting is not applied are carried on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair 
value being recorded in the statement of operations.   

(o)  Foreign currency translation: 

Foreign  currency  denominated  assets  and  liabilities  of  self-sustaining  foreign  operations  are 
translated  into  Canadian  Dollars  at  exchange  rates  in  effect  at  the  balance  sheet  date.  
Related  unrealized  gains  and  losses  are  included  in  the  net  change  in  unrealized  foreign 
currency translation gains (losses) in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.   

For  the  Company’s  integrated  foreign  operations  foreign  currency  monetary  assets  and 
liabilities are translated into Canadian Dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet 
date, while foreign currency non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian 
dollars  at  the  historical  exchange  rate  in  effect  when  the  related  asset  was  acquired  or 
obligation incurred.  Related unrealized translation gains and losses are included in Operating 
earnings  or  Other  foreign  exchange  gain  (loss)  in  the  Statement  of  Operations,  depending 
upon the nature of the item translated.  

Long-term obligations denominated in foreign currencies are from time to time designated as 
a  hedge  of  the  Company’s  investments  in  self-sustaining  foreign  operations  and  hedge 
accounting is utilized with resulting unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in 
Other  Comprehensive  Income  in  the  period  in  which  they  occur.    When  the  Company 
terminates  the  designation  of  the  hedging  relationship  and  discontinues  its  use  of  hedge 
accounting  any  accumulated  unrealized  foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses  remain  in 
Accumulated  Other  Comprehensive  Income.    Unrealized  foreign  exchange  gains  and  losses 
arising subsequent to termination of the designation of the hedge relationship are recorded in 
Other foreign exchange gain (loss) in the Statement of Operations.  

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

48 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies (continued): 

(o)  Foreign currency translation (continued): 

Unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses residing in Accumulated Other Comprehensive 
Income  will  be  released  to  the  Statement  of  Operations  upon  the  reduction  of  the  net 
investment  in  self-sustaining  foreign  operations  through  the  sale,  reduction  or  substantial 
liquidation of an investment position.  

Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average rates for 
the  period  with  the  exception  of  depreciation  and  amortization  of  foreign  currency 
denominated  long  term  assets  of  the  Company’s  integrated  foreign  operations,  which  are 
translated at historical exchange rates.   

(p)  Net earnings (loss) per share: 

Basic  earnings  (loss)  per  share  are  computed  by  dividing  net  earnings  by  the  weighted 
average  shares  outstanding  during  the  reporting  period.    Diluted  earnings  (loss)  per  share 
are computed using the treasury stock method. 

(q)  Asset retirement obligations: 

Asset retirement obligations are recognized at the fair value in the period in which the legal 
obligation was incurred, with fair value of a liability determined with reference to the present 
value  of  estimated  future  cash  flows.    In  periods  subsequent  to  the  initial  measurement, 
changes  in  the  liability  resulting  from  the  passage  of  time  and  revisions  to  fair  value 
calculations are recognized in the statement of operations as they occur. 

(r)  Impairment of long-lived assets, goodwill and related measurement uncertainty: 

Long-lived assets are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances 
indicate  that  the  carrying  value  may  not  be  recoverable.    The  Company  determines  if  an 
impairment loss exists by comparing the carrying amount of a long-lived asset to the sum of 
the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.  If an 
impairment loss exists, the amount of the loss is measured as the amount by which the long-
lived asset’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value.  

As at December 31, 2010, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets.  The 
recoverability  tests  performed  include  management  forecasts  of  cash  flows  arising from the 
use  and  disposition  of  the  relevant  assets.    Based  on  the  management  forecasts, 
undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value of the Company’s long-lived assets and no 
impairment charge is required at December 31, 2010. 

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances 
indicate that an impairment may exist.  The Company determines if an impairment loss exists 
by estimating the fair value of the goodwill and related reporting unit and comparing it to the 
carrying  amount  of  the  goodwill  and  related  reporting  unit.    When  the  carrying  value  of  a 
reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount 
equal to the excess. 

The  Company  uses  a  discounted  cash  flow  methodology  to  estimate  the  fair  value  of  the 
goodwill and related reporting unit.  The cash flows are based on management forecasts and 
an  appropriate  discount  rate  as  determined  by  reference  to  current  market  conditions  and 
specific company factors.  For the year ended December 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of 
the  goodwill  and  related  reporting  unit  exceeds  the  carrying  value  of  these  assets.  
Therefore, no impairment charge is required. 

Numerous  assumptions  are  required  in  conducting  the  recoverability  tests  and  the  more 
significant  ones  include  lumber  and  residual  chip  sales  prices,  applicable  foreign  exchange 
rates,  operating  rates  of  the  assets,  raw  material  and  conversion  costs,  and  the  amount  of 
sales  to  the  U.S.  from  Canada  and  the  level  of  export  taxes.    The  Company  has  analyzed 
external data in determining appropriate assumptions.   

 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

49 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

1.  Significant accounting policies and change in accounting policies (continued): 

(r)  Impairment of long-lived assets, goodwill and related measurement uncertainty (continued): 

Given the judgements and estimates required to carry out the tests for recoverability of long-
lived assets and goodwill, and the sensitivity of results to significant assumptions used, it is 
possible  that  future  conditions  may  change  and  may  result  in  different  assumptions  in  the 
future, which could result in impairment of the carrying values of the assets at that time. 

(s)  Comparative figures: 

Certain  of  the  prior  year’s  figures  have  been  reclassified  to  conform  to  the  presentation 
adopted in the current year. 

(t)  Future accounting changes: 

In  February  2008,  the  Canadian  Accounting  Standards  Board  confirmed  that  Canadian 
generally  accepted  accounting  principles  (“Canadian  GAAP”)  will  be  converged  with 
International  Financial  Reporting  Standards  for  fiscal  years  commencing  January  1,  2011.  
The  transition  from  Canadian  GAAP  to  IFRS  will  be  applicable  for the Company for the first 
quarter of 2011 when the Company will prepare both the current and comparative financial 
information using IFRS. 

While  IFRS  uses  a  conceptual  framework  similar  to  Canadian  GAAP,  there  are  significant 
differences  on  recognition,  measurement,  and  disclosures.    The  Company  has  identified  a 
number  of  key  areas  that  will  be  impacted  by  changes  in  accounting  policies,  including:  
property,  plant,  and  equipment;  impairment  of  assets;  provisions,  including  reforestation 
liabilities and asset retirement obligations; share-based payments; employee future benefits; 
and  future  income  taxes.    Management  is  finalizing  the  determination  of  the  impact  of  the 
application of IFRS on the financial statements and having these impacts audited. 

As a first-time adopter of IFRS, the Company is required to apply IFRS 1 First time adoption 
of International Reporting Standards which provides a number of optional exemptions to first-
time  adopters  to  ease  the  transition  to  IFRS.    The  Company  expects  to  apply  exemptions 
under each of the following IFRS 1 categories which are significant to the Company’s opening 
balance sheet: 

Property, plant and equipment 

IFRS  1  allows  a  company  to  use  fair  value  as  the  deemed  cost  for items of property, plant 
and equipment at the date of transition which results in an adjustment to Retained earnings 
in  the  opening  Balance  Sheet.    The  Company  has  identified  a  property  at  its  Hammond 
sawmill site for which it will take this election at the transition date 

Cumulative translation adjustments 

IFRS 1 provides an exemption that allows the cumulative translation account to be set to zero 
at the date of transition as an adjustment to Retained earnings in the opening Balance Sheet. 

Employee future benefits 

IFRS 1 provides an exemption that allows recognition of all unamortized actuarial gains and 
losses  at  the  transition  date  as  an  adjustment  to  Retained  earnings  in  the  opening  Balance 
Sheet.   

Business combinations 

IFRS  1  provides  an  exemption  which  eliminates  the  requirement  to  restate  business 
combinations entered into prior to the date of transition. 

 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

50 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

2.  Long-lived assets held for sale: 

In  2009,  the  Company  had  classified  the  property  at  the  former  Field  sawmill  site  located  in 
Courtenay, B.C., as held for sale at December 31, 2009.  As at December 31, 2010, the property 
was reclassified to Property, plant and equipment, note 5.   

3.  Inventories: 

Logs 
Lumber 
Other 

2010 

2009 

$  39,107 
27,353 
5,302 

$  31,011 
24,301 
4,847 

$  71,762 

$  60,159 

Inventory expensed in the period includes production costs, amortization of plant and equipment, 
and  depletion  and  amortization  of  timber, roads and other.  The inventory writedown to record 
inventory  at  the  lower  of  cost  and  net  realizable  value  at  December  31,  2010  was  $7,589,000 
(2009 - $9,578,000).  

4.  Investments and other assets: 

Seaboard Shipping Company Limited 
Other investments and deposits 
Pension asset (note 17(b)) 
Deferred financing fees, net of accumulated amortization 

Summarized information of Seaboard is as follows: 

Total assets 
Shareholders’ equity 
Net sales 

Interfor’s shipment percentage 
Interfor’s equity in earnings 
Distributions received 

2010 

$  17,125 
523 
8,858 
2,112 

$ 

2009 

8,774 
563 
7,121 
602 

$  28,618 

$  17,060 

2010 

2009 

$  30,202 
23,228 
41,995 

$  21,620 
17,699 
36,278 

 96.8% 

$  11,446 
3,096 

           75.7% 
1,885 
3,651 

$ 

In 2010, a distribution was made to the partners, of which the Company’s share was $3,096,000 
(2009 - $3,651,000).  In accordance with equity accounting, the distributions were recorded as a 
reduction of the investment.  See also Payable to investee company, note 8. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

51 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

5.  Property, plant and equipment: 

2010 

Land 
Buildings 
Machinery and equipment 
Mobile equipment 
Computer software and equipment 
Site improvements 
Other 

2009 

Land 
Buildings 
Machinery and equipment 
Mobile equipment 
Computer software and equipment 
Site improvements 
Other 

6.  Roads, bridges and timber tenures: 

2010 

Roads and bridges 
Timber tenures 

2009 

Roads and bridges 
Timber tenures 

$ 

Cost 

19,274 
61,808 
405,244 
13,589 
20,433 
32,002 
6,201 

Accumulated 
amortization 

- 
22,444 
158,367 
11,045 
13,643 
14,662 
4,401 

Net book 
value 

19,274 
39,364 
246,877 
2,544 
6,790 
17,340 
1,800 

$  558,551 

$  224,562 

$  333,989 

$ 

15,990 
71,198 
420,160 
8,892 
20,509 
25,400 
4,588 

$ 

- 
29,324 
151,110 
6,778 
11,321 
7,088 
3,615 

$ 

15,990 
41,874 
269,050 
2,114 
9,188 
18,312 
973 

$  566,737 

$  209,236 

$  357,501 

Cost 

Accumulated 
amortization 

Net book 
value 

$ 

43,958 
117,597 

$ 

26,895 
37,443 

$ 

17,063 
80,154 

$  161,555 

$ 

64,338 

$ 

97,217 

$ 

41,730 
101,718 

$ 

25,245 
34,708 

$ 

16,485 
67,010 

$  143,448 

$ 

59,953 

$ 

83,495 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

52 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

7.  Bank indebtedness and long-term debt: 

(a)  Bank indebtedness: 

Available line of credit 
Maximum borrowing available 
Operating Line drawings 
Outstanding letters of credit included in line utilization 
Unused portion of line 

2010 

$  65,000 
65,000 
- 
4,756 
60,244 

$ 

2009 

65,000 
61,926  
- 
4,997 
56,929 

On January 15, 2010 the Company amended its existing operating line of credit (“Operating 
Line”) and the maturity date was extended to February 28, 2011.  On August 19, 2010, the 
Company  further  amended  and  extended  its  existing  syndicated  credit  facilities  and  the 
maturity  date  of  the  Operating  Line  was  extended  to  July  28,  2012.    All  other  terms  and 
conditions of the Operating Line remained substantially unchanged except for a reduction in 
pricing. 

The  Operating  Line  may  be  drawn  in  either  CAD$  or  US$  advances,  and  bears  interest  at 
bank prime plus a margin or, at the Company’s option, at rates for Bankers’ Acceptances or 
LIBOR based loans plus a margin, and in all cases dependent upon a financial ratio of total 
debt divided by twelve months’ trailing EBITDA¹.  Borrowing levels under the line are subject 
to a borrowing base calculation dependent on certain accounts receivable and inventories.  

The  Operating  Line  is  secured  by  a  general  security  agreement  which  includes  a  security 
interest  in  all  accounts  receivable  and  inventories,  charges  against  timber  tenures,  and 
mortgage security on sawmills.  The Operating Line is subject to certain financial covenants 
including  a  minimum  working  capital  requirement,  a  maximum  ratio  of  total  debt  to  total 
capitalization and a minimum net worth calculation.  

As at December 31, 2010, there were no drawings under the Operating Line (December 31, 
2009 - $nil). 

(b)  Long-term debt: 

On  January  15,  2010  the  Company  amended  and  extended  its  existing  syndicated  credit 
facilities. 
from  $150,000,000  to 
$200,000,000, and its maturity date was extended to February 28, 2012.   

  The  Company’s  Revolving  Term  Line 

increased 

On  August  19,  2010,  the  Company  further  amended  and  extended  its  existing  syndicated 
credit  facilities  and  the  maturity  date  of  the  Revolving  Term  Line  was  extended  to  July  28, 
2013.    All  other  terms  and  conditions  of  the  Revolving  Term  Line  remained  substantially 
unchanged except for a reduction in pricing. 

The Revolving Term Line may be drawn in either CAD$ or US$ advances, and bears interest 
at bank prime plus a margin or, at the Company’s option, at rates for Bankers’ Acceptances 
or LIBOR based loans plus a margin, and in all cases dependent upon a financial ratio of total 
debt divided by twelve months’ trailing EBITDA¹.   

The  Revolving  Term  Line  is  secured  by  a  general  security  agreement  which  includes  a 
security  interest  in  all  accounts  receivable  and  inventories,  charges  against  timber  tenures, 
and  mortgage  security  on  sawmills.    The  term  line  is  subject  to  certain  financial  covenants 
including  a  minimum  working  capital  requirement,  a  maximum  ratio  of  total  debt  to  total 
capitalization and a minimum net worth calculation. 

¹EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depletion and amortization. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

53 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

7.  Bank indebtedness and long-term debt (continued): 

(b)  Long-term debt (continued): 

As at December 31, 2010, the Revolving Term Line was drawn by US$30,200,000 (December 
31,  2009  –  US$30,200,000)  revalued  at  the  year-end  exchange  rate  to  $30,037,000 
(December 31, 2009 - $31,740,000), and $126,000,000 (December 31, 2009 - $76,000,000) 
for  total  drawings  of  $156,037,000  (December  31,  2009  -  $107,740,000),  and  leaving  an 
unused available line of $43,963,000.     

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010, the Company 
drew US$35,000,000 ($35,819,000) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled its 
U.S. dollar non-revolving term line (the “Non-Revolving Term Line”).  At December 31, 2009 
the  Non-Revolving  Term  Line  was  fully  drawn  at  US$35,000,000  and  was  revalued  at  the 
year-end exchange rate to $36,785,000.  Upon repayment of the loan, the foreign exchange 
gain  of  $966,000  realized  on  repayment  of  the  Non-Revolving  Term  Line  was  recognized in 
Other  foreign  exchange  gain  (loss)  on  the  Statement  of  Operations  (2009  -  $5,845,000 
unrealized foreign exchange gain on revaluation of loan).  

The  Company  subsequently  drew  a  further  $36,715,000  and  repaid  the  drawings  of 
US$35,000,000 used to repay the Non-Revolving Term Line, realizing a foreign exchange loss 
of $896,000 which was recognized in Other foreign exchange gain (loss) on the Statement of 
Operations.   

The US$30,200,000 drawing under the Revolving Term Line has been designated as a hedge 
against the Company’s investment in its self-sustaining U.S. operations and unrealized foreign 
exchange  gains  of  $1,703,000  (2009  -  $5,043,000  gain)  arising  on  revaluation  of  the  Non-
Revolving Term Line were recognized in Other comprehensive income.   

Minimum principal amounts due on long-term debt within the next five years are follows: 

2011 
2012 
2013 
2014 
2015 

$            - 
- 
156,037 
- 

$ 156,037  

8.  Payable to investee company: 

On  July  30,  2010,  subsequent  to  the  sale  of  one  of  its  two  vessels,  the  Seaboard  Limited 
Partnership (“the Seaboard Partnership”), made an advance to its partners, with Interfor’s share 
of  the  advance  being  $6,896,000.    The  Seaboard  Partnership  made  a  second  advance  to  its 
partners,  and  Interfor  received  $8,842,000  on  December  30,  2010.  The  Company  signed 
unsecured  promissory  notes  in  respect  of  each  of  these  advances,  payable  on  demand  on  or 
before  January  3,  2011  and  non-interest  bearing  until  January  3,  2011  and  bearing  interest  at 
the rates of 4.5% thereafter for the July 30, 2010 advance and 4.0% per annum thereafter for 
the remaining advance. 

These  advances  were  settled  subsequent  to  December  31,  2010  (see  Subsequent  events, note 
22(a)). 

On  December  29,  2009,  the  Seaboard  Partnership  made  an  advance  to  its  partners,  with 
Interfor’s share of the advance being $3,096,000.  On January 4, 2010, the Seaboard Partnership 
declared an income distribution to its partners, of which the Company’s share of $3,096,000 was 
received by way of setoff against the promissory note payable to the Seaboard Partnership. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

54 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

9.  Other long-term liabilities: 

Road deactivation and environmental 
Pension and other post-retirement benefits (notes 17(b) and (e)) 
Long term incentive compensation 

$ 

Share based (notes 11(c) and (d)) 
Total shareholder return plan 

Other 

2010 
4,529 
5,152 

1,649 
2,130 
2,235 

$ 

2009 
5,026 
4,706 

1,550 
2,280 
1,754 

$  15,695 

$  15,316 

In  2003,  the  Company  introduced  a  Total  Shareholder  Return  Plan  (“TSR  Plan”)  for  certain  key 
executives.  Under the TSR Plan, the Company will pay compensation to the TSR Plan members if 
the compound annual growth rate of the Company’s share price exceeds 5% per annum over a 
three  year  period.    The  amount  of  compensation  payable  varies  with  the  amount  of  the 
compound  annual  growth  rate  to  a  maximum  of  15%  per  annum,  the  member’s  salary  and  a 
target  award  amount.    For  the  three  year  period  which  concluded  December  31,  2009,  a 
minimum target award was guaranteed for the Chief Operating Officer irrespective of the actual 
compound growth rate.  The guaranteed target award matured on December 31, 2009 and was 
converted  in  March  2010  into  a  long-term  payable  account  under  the  Deferred  Share  Unit  Plan 
(“DSU  Plan”)  and  is  included  in  Other  in  Other  long-term  liabilities.  Valuation  adjustments  are 
made  monthly  to  the  plan  based  on  a  referenced  investment  fund  and  are  charged  to 
compensation expense. 

The  Company  recorded  compensation  expense  under  the  TSR  Plan  of  $1,065,000  (2009  - 
$1,470,000) and $102,000 (2009 - $nil) under the long-term payable under the DSU Plan for the 
year ended December 31, 2010.  

10. Reforestation liability: 

The Company has an obligation to reforest areas harvested under various timber rights.  The 
obligation is incurred as production occurs and the fair value of the liability for reforestation is 
determined with reference to the present value of estimated future cash flows required to settle 
the obligation.   

Changes in the reforestation liability for the years ended December 31 are as follows: 

Reforestation liability, beginning of year 
Reforestation expense on current production 
Reforestation liability addition on acquisition of  
  Weyerhaeuser timber tenure 
Reforestation expenditures 
Accretion expense 
Changes in estimated future reforestation expenditures 

Consisting of: 
   Current portion included in accounts payable  

  and accrued liabilities 

   Long term reforestation liability 

2010 
$  21,496 
7,992 

$ 

2009 
24,345 
2,779 

742 
(6,260) 
1,031 
(199) 

- 
(5,969) 
1,098 
(757) 

$  24,802 

$ 

21,496 

$ 

9,785 
15,017 

$ 

6,772 
14,724 

$  24,802 

$ 

21,496 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

55 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

10. Reforestation liability (continued): 

The  total  undiscounted  amount  of  the  estimated  future  expenditures  required  to  settle  the 
reforestation  obligation  at  December  31,  2010  is  $28,165,000  (2009  -  $24,610,000).    The 
reforestation  expenditures  are  expected  to  occur  over  the  next  one  to  fifteen  years  and  have 
been  discounted  at  the  Company’s  estimated  credit-adjusted  risk-free  interest  rate  of  7.0%.  
Reforestation expense incurred due to current production and accretion expense are included in 
production costs for the year.   

11. Share capital: 

(a)  Share transactions: 

Authorized capital at December 31, 2010 and 2009 consists of: 

100,000,000 Class A subordinate voting shares without par value 

1,700,000 Class B common shares without par value 

5,000,000 preference shares without par value 

Share transactions during 2010 and 2009 were as follows: 

Balance, December 31, 2008 
Shares issued on exercise of options 

Class A 
46,101,476 
- 

Number 

Class B 
1,015,779 
- 

Total 
47,117,255 
- 

Amount 
$  288,580 
- 

Balance, December 31, 2009 
Shares issued on exercise of options 

46,101,476 
236,200 

1,015,779 
- 

47,117,255 
236,200 

288,580 
862 

Balance, December 31, 2010 

46,337,676 

1,015,779 

47,353,455 

$  289,442 

The  first  13-1/3¢  per  share  per  annum  of  dividends  to  common  shareholders  declared  are 
paid  on  the  Class  A  shares.    Any  additional  dividends  must  be  declared  in  equal  per  share 
amounts on the Class A and B shares. 

The  Class  B  shares  (carrying  ten  votes  per  share)  are  exchangeable  into  Class  A  shares 
(carrying  one  vote  per  share)  at  any  time  at  the  option  of  the  holder  or,  under  certain 
conditions  which  will  result  in  the  automatic  conversion  of  the  Class  B  shares  into  Class  A 
shares, on the basis of one Class A share for one Class B share. 

On January 3, 2008, the Company received approval to make a normal course issuer bid to 
acquire up to 1,300,000 Class A shares (representing approximately 2.8% of the outstanding 
Class  A  shares  as  at  December  31,  2007)  through  the  facilities  of  the  Toronto  Stock 
Exchange.    Any  Class  A  shares  purchased  by  the  Company  are  at  market  prices  and  are 
cancelled  as  purchased.    The  program  commenced  on  January  8,  2008  and  terminated  on 
January 7, 2009. 

The Company did not repurchase any Class A shares through the normal course issuer bid in 
2009.   

There was no change in contributed surplus in 2010 or 2009. 

At December 31, 2010, Class A shares are reserved for possible future issuance as follows: 

(i)  1,015,779 Class A shares are reserved for the conversion of Class B shares; and 

(ii)  1,918,740 Class A shares are reserved for possible issuance pursuant to the share option 

plan. 

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

56 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

11. Share capital (continued): 

(b)  Share option plan: 

The Company has an employee share option plan for its key employees and directors.  The 
vesting of the options occurs at a rate of 40% two years after granting and 20% per annum 
thereafter.    Options  expire  ten  years  after  the  date  of  the  grant.    Options  outstanding  at 
December 31,  2010  are  exercisable  at  prices  ranging  from  $3.65  to  $4.94  per  share,  being 
the  closing  market  price  for  the  shares  on  the  dates  that  the  options  were  granted.    The 
options expire on January 18, 2011 and April 30, 2011. 

Details of the Company’s share option plan for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
are as follows: 

2010 

2009 

Options 
Outstanding, beginning of year    751,340 
- 
Granted 
(236,200) 
Exercised 
(228,140) 
Expired or cancelled 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
$   4.44 
- 
3.65 
4.85 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
$  4.59 
- 
- 
5.00 

Options 
1,021,340 
- 
- 
(270,000) 

Outstanding, end of year 

287,000 

$  4.77 

751,340 

$  4.44 

Options exercisable, year end 

287,000 

$  4.77 

751,340 

$  4.44 

The options outstanding at December 31, 2010 have a weighted average remaining life of 0.3 
years.  

(c)  Share Appreciation Rights Plan: 

Awards  under  the  Share  Appreciation  Rights  Plan  (“SAR  Plan”)  have  been  granted  to 
directors, officers and senior managers of the Company.  Under the SAR Plan, awards will be 
expensed over the vesting periods when the market price of the common shares exceeds the 
strike price under the plan.  Changes in the quoted market value of those shares between the 
date  of  grant  and  the  measurement  date  result  in  a  change  in  the  measure  of  the 
compensation for the award and will be amortized over the remaining vesting periods.  The 
SAR Plan uses notional units that are valued based on the Company’s common share price on 
the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange.    The  units  are  exercisable  for  cash  and  recorded  as  liabilities 
(see Other long-term liabilities, note 9). 

2010 

2009 

Units 
Outstanding, beginning of year   1,732,580 
290,000 
Granted 
- 
Exercised 
(64,400) 
Expired or cancelled 

Weighted 
average 
strike price 
$  5.01 
4.73 
- 
3.70 

Units 
1,428,320 
363,500 
- 
(59,240) 

Weighted 
average 
strike price 
$  5.90 
1.38 
- 
4.28 

Outstanding, end of year 

1,958,180 

$  5.01 

  1,732,580 

$  5.01 

Units exercisable, year end 

1,110,580 

$  5.88 

921,960 

$  5.85 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

57 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

11. Share capital (continued) 

(c)  Share Appreciation Rights Plan (continued): 

Details of units outstanding under the SAR Plan at December 31, 2010 are as follows:  

Number 
outstanding, 
December 31, 
2010 
311,000 
912,860 
590,820 
143,500 

Strike 
price 
$1.38 
$3.40-$5.21 
$6.07-$7.30 
$8.02 

Units outstanding 
Weighted 
average 
remaining 
unit life (yrs) 

Weighted 
average 
strike price 
$  1.38 
  4.75 
6.60 
8.02 

8.2 
5.6 
3.2 
6.1 

Units exercisable 

Number 
exercisable, 
December 31, 
2010 
- 
451,160 
573,320 
86,100 

Weighted 
average 
strike price 
- 
$ 
  4.57 
6.59 
8.02 

    1,958,180 

$  5.01 

1,110,580 

$  5.88 

The Company recorded compensation expense in respect of the SAR Plan of $582,000 (2009 
–  expense  of  $546,000)  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2010.    Accrued  compensation 
payable on unexercised units totaled $1,128,000 (2009 - $546,000) at December 31, 2010, of 
which  $741,000  (2009  -  $184,000)  was  classified  current  and  recorded  in  accounts  payable 
and accrued liabilities and the balance was recorded in long-term liabilities (see Other long-
term liabilities, note 9). 

(d)  Deferred Share Unit Plan: 

In January 2004, the Company introduced a DSU Plan for Directors and senior officers of the 
Company.  The Plan, which allows for immediate vesting, is intended to provide a better link 
between  share  performance  and  compensation  for  the  participants,  in  that  DSU’s  either 
increase  or  decrease  in  value  in  a  direct  relationship  with  the  Company’s  Class  “A” 
Subordinate Voting shares.   

Participants  in  the  TSR  Plan  may  elect,  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  Company’s  Board  of 
Directors, to receive their award in DSU’s at the end of any performance period.  In respect 
of the guaranteed 2009 TSR award, the Board exercised its discretion and required the award 
to  be  converted  in  March  2010  into  a  long-term  payable  account  under  the  Deferred Share 
Unit Plan included in Other in Other long-term liabilities (note 9).  

DSU’s may also be granted directly to Directors or senior employees of the Company at the 
discretion of the Board and Directors may also elect to take DSU’s as payment of their annual 
retainer.    In  2010  a  total  of  46,784  DSU’s  (2009  –  31,602)  were  granted  to  or  taken  by 
Directors under the plan at an average value of $4.94 (2009 - $2.29) per unit.  

The Company recorded compensation expense of $124,000 (2009 – $1,195,000) for the year 
ended December 31, 2010 in respect of the DSU Plan.  Subsequent changes to share values 
will result in adjustments to the compensation accrual and expense.  At December 31, 2010, 
the  Company  had  480,249  (2009  –  361,465)  DSU’s  outstanding.    At  December  31,  2010, 
accrued  compensation  payable  in  respect  of  the  DSU  Plan  totaled  $2,135,000  (2009  - 
$1,781,000),  of  which  $873,000  (2009  -  $593,000)  was  classified  current  and  recorded  in 
accounts payable and accrued liabilities and the balance was recorded in long-term liabilities 
(see Other long-term liabilities, note 9). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

58 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

12. Other income (expense): 

Gain (loss) on disposal of surplus property, plant, 

and equipment, and investment 
Gain on settlement of timber takeback 
Other 

2010 

2009 

$ 

(201) 
376 
(200) 

$  22,085 
1,004 
(124) 

$ 

(25) 

$  22,965 

In 2010, the Company received further compensation under the Forest Act for timber, roads and 
bridges  resulting  from  the  2006  legislated  takeback  of  certain  logging  rights  on  the  B.C.  Coast 
which,  combined  with  minor  disposals  of  surplus  equipment  and  roads,  resulted  in  proceeds  of 
$1,325,000 and a net loss of $25,000. 

In  2009,  the  Company  completed  the  sale  of  its  former  Queensboro  millsite,  located  in  New 
Westminster, B.C. and its remaining surplus equipment, yielding net proceeds of $30,197,000 and 
a  gain  of  $21,169,000.    The  Company  also  disposed  of  surplus  property and buildings in Maple 
Ridge,  B.C.  which,  combined  with  other  disposals  of  surplus  equipment  and  an  investment, 
generated  sales  proceeds  of  $4,788,000  and  a  gain  of  $916,000.    The  Queensboro  millsite  and 
surplus  property  and  buildings  in  Maple  Ridge,  B.C.  had  been  classified  as  held  for  sale  at 
December 31, 2008. 

In  addition,  under  the  terms  of  the Forest Act,  the  Company  received  $2,000,000  as  advance 
compensation for timber, roads and bridges resulting from the 2006 legislated takeback of certain 
logging rights on the B.C. Coast, and recorded a gain of $1,004,000 in 2009. 

13. Restructuring costs and write-downs of plant and equipment: 

The Company recorded restructuring costs, and write-downs of plant and equipment consisting of 
the following: 

Plant and equipment write-downs 
Severance costs 
Other (recovery) 

$ 

2010 
485 
1,093 
- 

$ 

2009 
3,067 
1,565 
(265) 

$ 

1,578 

$ 

4,367 

During  2010  the  Company  restructured  certain  of  its  manufacturing  operations  and  revised 
certain of its previous estimates resulting in severance costs of $1,093,000.  The Company also 
recorded $485,000 in asset write-downs as it determined certain assets were impaired.  

During  2009,  the  Company  determined  certain  assets  were  impaired  in  the  current  operating 
environment and recorded $3,067,000 in asset write-downs. In addition, total severance costs of 
$1,565,000  were  recorded  as  the  Company  downsized  its  workforce  in  response  to  reduced 
operating rates.  A successful defense of a legal dispute in 2009 allowed the Company to reverse 
restructuring costs of $265,000 previously accrued.     

As  at  December  31,  2010,  $742,000  (2009  -  $1,359,000)  in  severance  and  other  cash 
restructuring  costs  are  included  in  accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities.    The  Company 
expects  to  pay  this  amount  in  2011  in  accordance  with  its  restructuring  plans.    In  addition,  a 
further  $523,000  (2009  -  $618,000)  in  other  restructuring  costs  are  also  included  in  accounts 
payable and accrued liabilities. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

59 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

14. Income taxes: 

Future income taxes are determined as follows: 

Future income tax assets: 
Losses carried forward 
Reforestation, restructuring and other accruals 
     deductible when paid 
Tax credits 

Valuation allowance 

Future income tax liabilities: 

Property, plant and equipment 
Other 

Current future income tax assets 
Non-current future income tax liabilities 

2010 

2009 

$ 

80,289 

$  68,502 

7,968 
2,520 
90,777 
(25,527) 
65,250 

(67,366) 
2,116 

- 

3,627 
(3,627) 

7,139 
2,779 
78,420 
(22,734) 
55,686 

(58,013) 
2,015 

$ 

$ 

(312) 

2,974 
(3,286) 

- 

$ 

(312) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

The reconciliation of income taxes at the statutory rate to the income tax recovery is as follows: 

Income tax expense (recovery) at the statutory rate of 

28.5% (2009 – 30.0%) 

Valuation allowance on future income tax assets 
Non-taxable income of investments accounted for by  

the equity method 

Entities with different tax rates 
Non-taxable portion of capital losses (gains) 
Change in future tax rates and statutory and tax recovery 

  rate difference 

Other 

2010 

2009 

$ 

(1,253) 
4,096 

$  (10,132) 
7,449 

(3,262) 
(599) 
(148) 

411 
290 

(565) 
(1,245) 
(6,013) 

789 
(169) 

$ 

(465) 

$ 

(9,886) 

The  Company’s  Canadian  non-capital  loss  carry-forwards  and  U.S.  net  operating  loss  carry-
forwards  totalling approximately $260,000,000 (2009 - $216,000,000) expire between 2011 and 
2030, and are available to reduce future taxable income.  The Company has provided a valuation 
allowance  in  respect  of  approximately  $72,000,000  (2009  -  $62,000,000)  of  its  operating  loss 
carry-forwards,  net  of  temporary  differences.    The  Company  also  has  B.C.  Manufacturing  and 
Processing  tax  credit  and  Canadian  investment  tax  credit  carry-forwards  of  $2,520,000  (2009  - 
$2,779,000) which expire between 2011 and 2026. 

 
 
 
   
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

60 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

15. Commitments and contingencies: 

(a)  Operating leases and contractual obligations: 

The  Company  is  obligated  under  various  operating  leases  and  contracts  requiring  minimum 
annual payments in each of the next five years as follows: 

2011 
2012 
2013 
2014 
2015 

$ 

6,070  
3,360 
2,580 
2,230 
1,840 

(b)  Central and North Coast Land Use Decisions: 

In 2006, the Government of B.C. announced land use decisions for the Central Coast and the 
North Coast regions of B.C. which recently resulted in permanent reductions in the Company’s 
allowable annual cut (“AAC”) in the plan areas.  The Company has not been harvesting its full 
AAC in this region for a number of years due to temporary reductions put in place during the 
negotiation period and uncertainty around operating areas.  

In 2009, the Company received $2,500,000 as an advance of compensation under the Forest 
Act  for  timber,  roads  and  bridges,  and  forestry  and  engineering  work  related  to  timber 
returned pursuant to the Plan.  The Company recorded $2,000,000 as proceeds on disposition 
of related assets, and $500,000 as a recovery of production costs. 

In  2010,  the  Company  received  $376,000  as  final  settlement  of  compensation  which  was 
recorded as proceeds on disposition of related assets. 

No  further  compensation  payable  to  the  Company  as  a  result  of  the  AAC  reductions  is 
expected. 

(c)  Softwood Lumber Agreement: 

On  January  18,  2011  U.S.  trade  representatives  filed  for  arbitration  under  the  provisions  of 
the  Softwood  Lumber  Agreement  ("SLA")  over  its  concern  that  the  Province  of  British 
Columbia ("B.C.") is charging too low a price for certain timber harvested on public lands in 
the  B.C.  Interior.  The  Company  believes  that  B.C.  and  Canada  are  complying  with  their 
obligations under the SLA.  

As  the  U.S.  arbitration  request  is  still  in  preliminary  stages  the  existence  of  any  potential 
claim  has  not  been  determined  and  no  provision  has  been  recorded  in  the  financial 
statements as at December 31, 2010. 

(d)  Storm damage: 

In  the  latter  half  of  September  2010,  heavy  rains  and  strong  winds  on  northern  Vancouver 
Island and the B.C. Central Coast triggered severe power outages, mudslides, road washouts 
and flooding, with a state of emergency declared in several populated areas.  Some logging 
areas were impacted by these severe storms with bridge and culvert damage, road washouts 
and slides in reforested areas.  Due to the remoteness and magnitude of the areas impacted 
it  has  been  difficult  to  fully  assess  the  extent  of  the  damage  and  its  related  costs.    The 
Company  continues  to  pursue  provincial  and  federal  government  assistance.  Certain losses 
are covered by insurance and as at December 31, 2010, a receivable of $113,000 has been 
set up for recovery of qualifying expenditures, net of the insurance deductible.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

61 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

15. Commitments and contingencies (continued): 

(d)  Storm damage (continued): 

To  December  31,  2010,  $103,000  has  been  expensed  in  the  Statement  of  Operations  as  a 
result of storm damage related expenses.   

The  Company  is  actively  working  with  its  insurers  to  ensure  maximum  recovery  of  future 
restoration expenditures and business interruption losses. 

(e)  Surety Performance Bonds 

The Company has posted $8,109,000 in surety performance bonds, with various expiry dates 
extending through 2014. 

(f)  Other contingencies: 

The  Company  is  subject  to  a  number  of  claims  arising  in  the  normal  course  of  business  in 
respect  of  which  either  an  adequate  provision  has  been  made  or  for  which  no  material 
liability is expected. 

16. Net earnings per share: 

Net  earnings  (loss)  per  share  is  calculated  utilizing  the  treasury  stock  method  approach  for 
determining  the  dilutive  effect  of  options  issued.    The  reconciliation  of  the  numerator  and 
denominator is determined as follows: 

2010 
  Weighted 
average 
  number of 

Net loss 

Shares  Per share 

2009 
  Weighted 
average 
  number of 
Shares 

Net loss 

Per share 

(3,934) 
- 

47,134  $ 

7* 

(0.08) 
- 

$  (23,887) 
- 

47,117 
- 

(0.51) 
- 

Basic earnings 

(loss) per share  $ 

Share options 

Diluted earnings  

(loss) per share  $ 

(3,934) 

47,134  $ 

(0.08) 

$  (23,887) 

47,117 

$  (0.51) 

*Where the addition of share options to the total shares outstanding has an anti-dilutive impact on 
the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation, those share options have not been included in 
the total shares outstanding for purposes of the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. 

17. Pension and other post-retirement plans: 

In Canada, the Company maintains a number of savings and retirement plans that are available 
to employees that meet certain eligibility requirements.  A Group Registered Retirement Savings 
Plan (“RRSP”) and a Deferred Profit Sharing Plan (“DPSP”) is available to salaried employees.  A 
defined  benefit  pension  plan  is  available  to  non-union  hourly  employees  at  the  Adams  Lake 
operations.    Based  on  eligibility,  either  a  defined  benefit  pension  plan  and  a  post  retirement 
medical  and  life  insurance  plan  or  a  defined  contribution  pension  plan  is  available  to  Canadian 
Merchant  Service  Guild  (“CMSG”)  employees  in  the  Interior  of  B.C.    In  addition,  the  Company 
contributes  to  an  industry-wide  defined  benefit  pension  plan  for  United  Steelworkers  unionized 
employees.   

In the U.S., the Company maintains a 401(k) plan that is available to all eligible employees. 

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

62 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

17. Pension and other post-retirement plans (continued): 

The Company also maintains supplementary pension plans for certain senior management in both 
Canada and the U.S. 

Total cash payments for employee future benefits for 2010, consisting of cash contributed by the 
Company  to  its  funded  pension  plans,  cash  contributed  to  the  DPSP  and  401(k)  plans,  cash 
contributed  to  a  multiemployer  defined  benefit  pension  plan,  and  cash  paid  under  senior 
management supplementary pension plans was $6,018,000 (2009 - $4,675,000). 

(a)  RRSP AND DPSP for Canada: 

In Canada, salaried employees of the Company are provided with the opportunity of making 
voluntary contributions based on a percentage of an employee’s earnings to the RRSP.  The 
Company  matches  employees’  RRSP  contributions  in  the  DPSP  with  the  employee’s  future 
retirement  benefits  based  on  these  contributions  along  with  investment  earnings  on  the 
contributions.   

For  the  DPSP,  the  Company’s  funding  obligations  are  satisfied  upon  making  cash 
contributions to an employee’s account.  For 2010, the pension expense for this plan is equal 
to the Company’s contribution of $1,107,000 (2009 - $1,145,000).  

Certain  eligible  employees  of  the  CMSG  are  required  to  make  contributions  based  on  a 
percentage of earnings into the defined contribution plan.  For 2010, the pension expense is 
equal to the Company’s contribution of $8,000 (2009 - $nil). 

(b)  Defined benefit plans: 

The  Company  measures  its  accrued benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets for 
accounting purposes as at December 31 of each year. The most recent actuarial valuation of 
the Adams Lake and CMSG pension plans was as of December 31, 2009, and for the CMSG 
post-retirement  benefits  obligations  was  as  of  April  30,  2008.    The  next  required  funding 
valuations  for  the  defined  benefit  pension  plans  is  as  of  December  31,  2012  and  the  next 
scheduled  valuation  for  the  other  post-retirement  benefits  obligation  will  be  as  of  April  30, 
2011. 

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

63 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

17. Pension and other post-retirement plans (continued): 

(b)  Defined benefit plans (continued): 

Other Post-retirement Benefits 

Pension Benefits 

2010 

2009 

2010 

2009 

Accrued benefit obligation: 
Beginning of year 
Actuarial (gain) loss 
Service cost  
Interest cost on accrued 
   benefit obligation 
Benefit payments 
Impact of new discount 
   rate at year-end 
End of year 

Plan assets: 

Fair value, beginning of year 
Expected return on plan assets 
Employer contributions 
Employee contributions 
Benefit payments 
Actuarial gain (loss) 
Fair value, end of year 

$ 

1,025  $ 
- 
21 

874  $ 
9 
15 

29,136  $ 
730 
587 

64 
(54) 

113 
1,169 

- 
   - 
54 
- 
(54) 
- 
- 

62 
(59) 

124 
1,025 

- 
- 
59 
- 
(59) 
- 
- 

1,841 
(1,993) 

2,925 
33,226 

29,881 
2,106 
2,177 
219 
(1,993) 
578 
32,968 

25,311 
- 
275 

1,797 
(1,593) 

3,346 
29,136 

25,575 
1,787 
1,379 
125 
(1,593) 
2,608 
29,881 

Funded status  
   – plan surplus (deficit) 
Unamortized actuarial loss (gain) 

(1,169) 
99 

(1,025) 
(14) 

(258) 
9,116 

745 
6,376 

Accrued benefit asset (liability) $ 

(1,070)  $ 

(1,039)  $ 

8,858  $ 

7,121 

Plan assets consist of: 
Asset category 

Equity securities 
Debt securities 
Other 

Total 

2010 

2009 
  Percentage of plan assets 
55% 
42% 
3% 

63% 
37% 
0% 

100% 

100% 

The Company’s accrued benefit asset (liabilities) are included in the Company’s balance sheet 
as follows (see Investments and other assets, note 4 and Other long-term liabilities, note 9): 

Investments and other assets  $ 
Accounts payable and accrued 
   liabilities 
Other long-term liabilities 

Post-Retirement Benefits 
2009 

2010 

-  $ 

-  $ 

Pension Benefits 

2010 
8,858  $ 

2009 
7,121 

(54) 
(1,016) 

(50) 
(989) 

- 
- 

- 
- 

$ 

(1,070)  $ 

(1,039)  $ 

8,858  $ 

7,121 

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
   
 
International Forest Products Limited 

64 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

17. Pension and other post-retirement plans (continued): 

(b)  Defined benefit plans (continued): 

The Company’s net expense for the Company’s defined benefit pension and post-retirement 
benefits plans are as follows: 

Current service cost 
Interest cost 
Expected return on plan assets 
Amortization of actuarial 

$ 

gains (losses) 

Post-Retirement Benefits 
2009 

2010 

21  $ 
64 
- 

15  $ 
62 
- 

Pension Benefits 

2010 

368  $ 

1,841 
(2,106) 

2009 
150 
1,797 
(1,787) 

- 

(5) 

337 

280 

440 

$ 

85  $ 

72  $ 

440  $ 

Actuarial assumptions used in accounting for the Company maintained benefit plans are: 

Post-Retirement Benefits 
2009 

Pension Benefits 

2010 

2009 

2010 
Accrued benefit obligation as of December 31 
5.5% 
- 

Discount rate 
Compensation increases¹ 

Pension expense 
Discount rate 
Expected return on plan assets 
Compensation increases¹ 

6.25% 
- 
- 

6.25% 
- 

7.25% 
- 
- 

5.5% 
3.25% 

6.25% 
7.0% 
3.25% 

6.25% 
3.5% 

7.25% 
7.0% 
3.5% 

For measurement purposes at December 31, 2010, the Company has assumed a 6.0% health 
care cost trend in 2011 grading down to 3.5% in 2014 (2009 – 7.90% health care cost trend 
in 2010 grading down to 4.27% in 2015). 

¹Compensation increases only relate to the CMSG plan. 

 (c) Unionized employees’ pension plan: 

The Company contributes to an industry-wide benefit plan for unionized employees based on 
a predetermined amount per hour worked by an employee.  For 2010, the pension expense 
for  these  plans  is  equal  to  the  Company’s  contribution  of  $1,882,000  (2009  -  $1,276,000).  
The Company’s liability is limited to its contributions. 

(d)  401(k) plan for U.S.: 

IPI  and  Cedarprime  Inc.,  the  Company’s  U.S.  operating  subsidiaries,  match  employee 
contributions based on a percentage of the employee’s earnings and vest immediately.  The 
Company’s funding obligations are satisfied upon making cash contributions to an employee’s 
account.  For 2010, the pension expense for this plan is equal to the Company’s contribution 
of $589,000 (2009 - $573,000). 

In  2005,  contributions  based  on  a  discretionary  profit  sharing  allocation  were  replaced  with 
the  matching  component.    Previous  contributions  under  profit  sharing  allocation  component 
continue to vest in years two through six of employment at a rate of 20% per annum.  

 
 
 
   
   
 
   
 
   
   
 
International Forest Products Limited 

65 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

17. Pension and other post-retirement plans (continued): 
(e)  Senior management supplementary pension plans: 

The  Company  provides  supplementary  pension  benefits  to  certain  members  of  its  senior 
management  in  the  form  of  a  notional  extension  of  the  Deferred  Profit  Sharing  Plan  in 
Canada  and  the  401(k)  plan  in  the  U.S.    These  commitments  are  not  funded  but  are  fully 
accrued  by  the  Company  (note  9),  with  a  portion  of  the  commitments  being  secured  by 
irrevocable letters of credit. 

The  Company  also  maintains  a  defined  benefit  pension  plan  for  a  former  senior  executive.  
The  accrued  benefit  obligation  is  $839,000  (2009  -  $733,000),  of  which  $359,000  (2009  - 
$361,000) is funded.    

During 2010 the Company made cash payments of $202,000 (2009 - $243,000) and recorded 
an expense of $644,000 (2009 - $459,000) in respect of these plans. 

The amounts accrued are as follows: 

2010 

2009 

Accrual for defined contribution commitments 
Accrual for defined benefit commitments 

$  3,945 
480 

$ 

3,629 
372 

The accrued liabilities are included in the Company’s balance sheet as follows: 

$  4,425 

$ 

4,001 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Other long-term liabilities (note 9) 

2010 

2009 

$ 

289 
4,136 

$ 

284 
3,717 

$  4,425 

$ 

4,001 

18. Related party transactions: 

In  2010  the  Company  had  lumber  sales  to  a  significant  shareholder  in  the amount of  $751,000    
(2009  -  $926,000).    Shipping  services  provided  by  Seaboard  totaled  $7,005,000  (2009  - 
$4,650,000).    In  addition,  the  Company  provided  management  and  other  support  services  to 
Seaboard  totaling  $500,000  in  2010  (2009  -  $nil)  and  lumber  sales  to  Seaboard  of  $148,000 
(2009 - $138,000).  These transactions were conducted on a normal commercial basis, including 
terms and prices. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

66 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

19. Segmented information: 

The  Company  manages  its  business  as  a  single  operating  segment,  solid  wood.    The  Company 
harvests  and  purchases  logs  which  are  sorted  by  species,  size  and  quality  and  then  either 
manufactured  into  lumber  products  at  the  Company’s  sawmills,  or  sold.    Substantially  all 
operations are located in British Columbia, Canada and the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. 

The Company sells to both foreign and domestic markets as follows: 

Canada 
United States 
Japan 
China/Taiwan 
Other export 

Sales by product line are as follows: 

Lumber 
Logs 
Wood chips and other by products 
Other 

2010 

2009 

$  171,113 
244,625 
80,856 
79,625 
49,399 

$  113,558 
160,955 
56,403 
18,412 
40,447 

$  625,618 

$  389,775 

2010 

2009 

$  481,983 
79,763 
56,217 
7,655 

$  288,627 
60,443 
34,349 
6,356 

$  625,618 

$  389,775 

Capital assets, goodwill and other intangibles by geographic location are as follows: 

Canada 
United States 

20. Capital management: 

2010 

2009 

$  302,319 
141,965 

$  299,365 
158,133 

$  444,284 

$  457,498 

The Company’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and 
market  confidence  and  to  sustain  future  development  of  the  business.    The  Company  monitors 
the  return  on  average  invested  capital,  which  it  defines  as  net  earnings  (loss)  plus  after  tax 
interest cost divided by the average of opening and closing invested capital comprised of the total 
of bank indebtedness, long-term debt and shareholders’ equity. 

The  Company  seeks  to  maintain  a  balance  between  the  higher  returns  that  might  be  possible 
with  the  leverage  afforded  by  higher  borrowing  levels  and  the  security  afforded  by  a  sound 
capital position.  The Company’s target is to create value for its shareholders over the long-term 
through increases in share value. 

In 2009, in the face of the global economic downturn and extremely poor housing markets, the 
Company’s focus was on managing the business for cash, severely curtailing discretionary capital 
spending and ensuring adequate liquidity was maintained.   

 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
 
International Forest Products Limited 

67 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

20. Capital management (continued): 

In  2010,  as  the  global  economy  showed  signs  of  recovery  the  Company  reassessed  its  capital 
spending programs and approved some capital spending on discretionary projects in addition to 
expenditures  related  to  maintenance  of  operating  capacity  and  increased  expenditures  on  road 
construction.    In  addition,  the  Company  acquired  a  timber  tenure  in  the  B.C.  Interior  from 
Weyerhaeuser  Company  Limited,  securing  approximately  275,000  cubic  metres  of  allowable 
annual cut to its interior fibre supply. 

There  were  no  changes  in  the  Company’s  approach  to  capital  management  during  the  period.  
Under  its  debt  financing  agreement,  the  Company  cannot  exceed  a  total  debt  to  total 
capitalization  ratio  of  45%,  with  total  debt  defined  as  the  total  of  bank  indebtedness,  including 
letters  of  credit,  and  long-term  debt,  net  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  total  capitalization 
defined as total debt plus Shareholders’ Equity.  The financial covenants under the debt financing 
agreement also carry a minimum working capital and a minimum net worth requirement. 

The Company is in compliance with all of its debt covenants and expects to remain in compliance. 

21. Financial instruments: 

(a)  Fair value of financial instruments: 

At  December  31,  2010,  the  fair  value  of  the  Company's  long-term  debt  and  bank 
indebtedness  approximated  its  carrying  value  of  $156,037,000  (2009  -  $144,525,000).   The 
fair values of other financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to their short-
term nature. 

(b)  Derivative financial instruments: 

The  Company  employs  financial  instruments,  such  as  interest  rate  swaps  and  foreign 
currency  forward  and  option contracts, to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates 
and foreign exchange rates.  The Company does not expect any credit losses in the event of 
non-performance  by  counter  parties  as  the  counterparties  are  the  Company’s  Canadian 
bankers, which are highly rated. 

As  at  December  31,  2010,  the  Company  has  outstanding  obligations  to  sell  a  maximum  of 
US$22,500,000  at  an  average  rate  of  CAD$1.0168  to  the  US$1.00,  and  sell  Japanese 
¥75,000,000 at an average rate of ¥83.03 to the USD$1.00 during 2011.  All foreign currency 
gains or losses to December 31, 2010 have been recognized in the Statement of Operations 
and the fair value of these foreign currency contracts has been measured based on Level 2 of 
the  fair  value  hierarchy  and  has  been  recorded  as  an  asset  of  $492,000  in  accounts 
receivable  and  a  liability  of  $18,000  in  accounts  payable  (2009  -  $403,000  asset  fair  value 
measured based on Level 2 and recorded in accounts receivable).    

During September 2005, the Company entered into a cross currency interest rate swap.  The 
Company  had  agreed  to  receive  US$20,000,000  at  maturity  on  September  1,  2009  in 
exchange for payment of CAD$23,530,000 (an exchange rate of 1.1765).  In addition, during 
the term of the swap the Company paid an amount based on annual interest of 5.84% on the 
CAD$23,530,000  and  received  a  90  day  LIBOR  plus  a  spread  of  200  basis  points  on  the 
US$20,000,000.    LIBOR  was  recalculated  at  set  interval  dates.    The  swap  matured  on 
September 1, 2009 and total foreign exchange losses of $2,050,000 were recognized in 2009.    

(c)  Hedge of investment in self-sustaining foreign operation: 

On  October  1,  2008,  the  Company  designated  the  US$30,200,000  funds  drawn  under  its 
Revolving  Term  Line  for  the  acquisition  of  its  Beaver  operations  as  a  hedge  against  its 
investment  in  its  self-sustaining  U.S.  operations.    Unrealized  foreign  exchange  gains  of 
$1,703,000  in  2010  (2009  -  $5,043,000  gain)  have  been  recorded  in  Other  Comprehensive 
Income.   

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

68 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

21. Financial instruments (continued): 

(d)  Financial risk management: 

Financial  instrument  assets  include  cash  resources,  deposits  and accounts receivable.  Cash 
resources and deposits are designated as held-for-trading and measured at fair value, while 
accounts receivable are designated as loans and receivables and measured at amortized cost. 

Financial  instrument  liabilities  include  bank  indebtedness,  accounts  payable  and  accrued 
liabilities,  long-term  debt,  and  certain  other  long-term  liabilities.    All  financial  liabilities  are 
designated as other liabilities and are measured at amortized cost.   

There are no financial instruments classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. 

The use of financial instruments exposes the Company to credit, liquidity and market risk. 

The  Board  of  Directors  has  overall  responsibility  for  the  establishment  and  oversight  of  the 
Company’s  risk  management  framework.    The  Company’s  risk  management  policies  are 
established  to  identify  and  analyze  the  risks  faced  by  the  Company,  to  set  appropriate  risk 
limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits.  Risk management policies 
and  systems  are  reviewed  regularly  to  reflect  changes  in  market  conditions  and  the 
Company’s activities.  Through its standards and procedures, management has developed a 
control environment in which employees are clear on roles and obligations and management 
regularly monitors compliance with its risk management policies and procedures. 

(i)  Credit risk: 

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a 
financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises primarily from the 
Company’s receivables from customers and from cash.  

Accounts receivable 

The  Company’s  exposure  to  credit  risk  is  dependent  upon  individual  characteristics  of 
each  customer.    Each  new  customer  is  assessed  for  creditworthiness  before  standard 
payment and delivery terms and conditions are offered, with such review encompassing 
any external ratings, and bank and other references.  Purchase limits are established for 
each customer, and are regularly reviewed.  In some cases, where customers fail to meet 
the  Company’s  benchmark  creditworthiness,  the  Company  may  choose  to  transact  with 
the customer on a prepayment basis.   

All North American sales are conducted under standard industry terms.  All lumber sales 
outside  of  the  North  American  markets  are  either  insured  by  the  Export  Development 
Corporation or are secured by irrevocable letters of credit. 

Accounts receivable (continued) 

The Company regularly reviews the collectibility of its accounts receivable and establishes 
an  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  based  on  its  best  estimate  of  any  potentially 
uncollectible  accounts.    Historically,  the  Company  has  managed  its  credit  tightly  and 
experienced  minimal  bad  debts,  despite  the  impacts  of  the  global  economic  downturn.  
Based  on  this  past  experience  and  its  detailed review of trade accounts receivable past 
due  which  were  considered  uncollectible,  a  reserve  in  respect  of  doubtful  accounts  of 
$4,000 was recorded (2009 - $57,000) for specific trade receivables. 

Deposits 

The Company limits it exposure to credit risk by only investing in liquid securities and only 
with  counterparties  that  have  a  high  credit  rating.    As  such,  management  does  not 
expect any counterparty to fail to meet its obligations. 

 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

69 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

21. Financial instruments (continued): 

(d)  Financial risk management (continued): 

(i)  Credit risk (continued): 

Guarantees 

In 2009, the Company provided a parent guarantee on the U.S. Line utilized by its U.S. 
operating  subsidiary.    This  was  in  compliance  with  the  Company’s  policy  to  provide 
financial guarantees only with respect to wholly-owned subsidiary companies.  The U.S. 
Line  was  not  extended  when  it  matured  on  April  24,  2009  and  the  guarantee  was 
withdrawn.   

The Company did not provide any guarantees in 2010. 

Exposure to credit risk 

The  carrying  amount  of  financial  assets  represents  the  maximum  credit  exposure  for 
receivables in North America.  As lumber sales outside of the North American markets are 
insured by the Export Development Corporation to 90% or secured by irrevocable letters 
of credit, credit exposure for these sales is limited. 

Accounts receivable carrying value at the reporting date by geographic region was: 

Canada 
United States 
Japan 
China/Taiwan 
Other 

(ii)  Liquidity risk: 

2010 

2009 

$  15,418 
13,259 
6,057 
7,268 
3,959 

$  11,626 
11,517 
5,300 
951 
3,557 

$  45,961 

$  32,951 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations 
as  they  fall  due.    The  Company  ensures,  as  far  as  possible,  that  it  will  always  have 
sufficient  liquidity  to  meet  obligations  when  due  and  monitors  cash  flow  requirements 
daily and projections weekly.  Weekly debt graphs are reviewed by senior management 
to monitor cash balances and debt line utilizations.  Given the global economic downturn 
experienced through most of 2009, Company executive focused on cash management to 
ensure maintenance of adequate liquidity and continued this discipline through 2010.  

The  Company  also  maintains  a  revolving  Canadian  Operating  Line  that  can  be  drawn 
down  to  meet  short-term  financing  needs.    In  early  2009,  the  Company  amended  and 
extended its existing Canadian syndicated credit facilities and as part of the amendment, 
margining availability was extended to include inventory domiciled in the United States.   

As  a  consequence  of  the  extension  of  margining  coverage,  all  U.S.  working  capital  is 
included  in  the  Canadian  operating  facility  and  the  U.S.  Line  was  not  extended  when  it 
matured on April 24, 2009 with all outstanding drawings under the U.S. Line repaid. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

70 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

21. Financial instruments (continued): 

(d)  Financial risk management (continued): 

(ii)  Liquidity risk (continued): 

The  estimated  cash  payments  due  in  respect  of  contractual  and  legal  obligations  are 
summarized as follows:  

Payments due by period 
Up to 
1 year 

2-3 
years 

4-5 
years 

After 5 
years 

Total 

Accounts payable and 
     accrued liabilities 
Income taxes payable 
Payable to investee  
     company (note 22(a)) 
Long-term debt 
Reforestation liability 
Other long-term liabilities 
Pension solvency payments 
Operating leases and  
     contractual commitments 

$  44,407 
230 

$  44,407  $ 
230 

-  $ 
- 

-  $ 
- 

- 
- 

15,738 
156,037 
28,165 
21,774 
4,214 

15,738 
- 
9,785 
4,075 
1,505 

- 
156,037 
6,949 
5,419 
1,522 

- 
- 
5,423 
1,809 
800 

- 
- 
6,008 
10,471 
387 

19,290 

6,070 

5,940 

4,070 

3,210 

Total contractual obligations 

$289,855  $  81,810 

$175,867  $  12,102 

$  20,076 

(iii)  Market risk: 

Market  risk  is  the  risk  that  changes  in  market  prices,  such  as  foreign  exchange  rates, 
interest  rates  and  equity  prices,  will  affect  the  Company’s  income  or  the  value  of  its 
holdings of financial instruments.  The objective of market risk management is to manage 
and  control  market  risk  exposures  within  acceptable  parameters,  while  optimizing  the 
return on risk. 

Currency risk 

The  Company  is  exposed  to  currency  risk  on  cash  and  deposits,  sales,  purchases  and 
loans that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional currencies 
of  the  Company’s  domestic  and  foreign  operations,  primarily  Canadian  (CAD)  and  U.S. 
dollars  (USD),  but  also  the  Euro,  Sterling  and  Yen.    As  required,  the  Company  uses 
forward  exchange  contracts  and  cross  currency  interest  rate  swaps  to  manage  its 
currency  risk,  as  described  in  Note  21(b),  Derivative  financial  instruments.    Daily,  the 
Company  assesses  its  foreign  exchange  exposure  by  reviewing  outstanding  contracts, 
pending order files and working capital denominated in foreign currencies. 

At December 31, 2010, the Company has US$ drawings under its Revolving Term Line of 
US$30,200,000  (2009  –  US$30,200,000).    The  US$  drawings  under this Line have been 
designated  as  a  hedge  against  the  investment  in  the  Company’s  self-sustaining  U.S. 
operations.   

In conjunction with amendments to its credit facilities on January 15, 2010, the Company 
drew US$35,000,000 ($35,819,000) on its Revolving Term Line and repaid and cancelled 
its  U.S.  dollar  Non-Revolving  Term  Line.    Upon  repayment  of  the  loan,  the  realized 
foreign exchange gain of $966,000 was recognized in Other foreign exchange gain(loss) 
on the Statement of Operations. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

71 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

21. Financial instruments (continued): 

(d)  Financial risk management (continued): 

(iii) Market risk: (continued): 
Currency risk (continued) 

At December 31, 2009, the Non-Revolving Term Line was fully drawn at US$35,000,000. 

As  at  December  31,  the  Company’s  accounts  receivable  were  denominated  in  the 
following currencies (in thousands): 
2010 

Japanese ¥ 

USD 

CAD 

Accounts receivable 
Accounts receivable held by  

17,351 

17,938 

44,335 

self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries 

- 

10,480 

- 

2009 

Accounts receivable 
Accounts receivable held by  

17,351 

28,418 

44,335 

CAD 

USD 

Japanese ¥ 

14,661 

9,507 

46,853 

self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries 

- 

7,362 

- 

14,661 

16,869 

46,853 

As at December 31, 2010, the domestic operations of the Company held cash and cash 
equivalents  of  US$6,171,000  (2009 – US$1,462,000) and no bank indebtedness (2009 - 
$nil).    Cash  and  cash  equivalents  held  by  self-sustaining  and  other  foreign  U.S. 
subsidiaries totalled US$564,000 (2009 - US$1,348,000). 

Based  on  the  Company’s  net  exposure  to  foreign  currencies  as  at  December  31,  2010, 
including  USD  denominated  cash  held  in  deposits  and  cash  equivalents  and  USD 
denominated  debt  and  other  USD  denominated  financial  instruments,  the  sensitivity  of 
the USD balances to the Company’s net annual earnings is as follows: 

U.S. Dollar 

$0.01 increase vs CAD$   

$negligible decrease in net income 

Based on the Company’s net exposure to foreign currencies as at December 31, 2010, in 
respect of its net investment in its U.S. subidiaries, the sensitivity of the USD balances to 
the Company’s Other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows: 

U.S. Dollar 

$0.01 increase vs CAD$   

$1,315,000 decrease in OCI 

Interest rate risk 

The  Company  reduced  its  exposure  to  changes  in  interest  rates  on  borrowings  by 
entering  into  cross  currency  interest  rate  swap,  as  described  in  Note  21(b)  Derivative 
financial instruments.  This agreement matured on September 1, 2009. 

Based  on  the  Company’s  average  debt  level  during  2010,  the  sensitivity  of  a  100  basis 
point  increase  in  interest  rates  would  result  in  an  approximate  decrease  of  $1,135,000 
(2009 - $1,140,000) in net annual earnings. 

Other market price risk 

The  Company  does  not  enter  into  commodity  contracts  other  than  to  meet  the 
Company’s expected usage and sale requirements and such contracts are not settled net. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
International Forest Products Limited 

72 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except number of shares and per share amounts) 

22. Subsequent events: 

(a)  Seaboard Partnership: 

On January 3, 2011, the Seaboard Partnership declared an income distribution to its partners.  
Interfor’s  share  was  $15,738,000  and  was  settled  by  way  of  setoff  against  the  promissory 
note payable to the Seaboard Partnership (see Payable to investee company, note 8). 

(b)  Seaboard Partnership windup: 

On  January  5,  2011,  all  other  partners  in  the  Seaboard  Partnership  withdrew  and  the 
Company  became  the  sole  owner  of  Seaboard.    Seaboard  Partnership  was  wound-up  on 
January  7,  2011  and  continues  operations  as  Seaboard  Shipping  Company  Limited  which  is 
wholly  owned  by  Interfor.    Its  accounts  will  be  included  in  the  consolidated  financial 
statements of the Company from the date of change in control.  

 
 
 
 
73 

International Forest Products Limited 

ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM 

Dated as of February 9, 2011 

FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION  

This  report  contains  forward-looking  statements.    Forward-looking  statements  are  statements  that 
address or discuss activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates may occur 
in the future.  Forward-looking statements are included in the description of areas which are likely to be 
impacted by the description of future cash flows and liquidity under the headings.  These forward-looking 
statements reflect management’s current expectations and beliefs and are based on certain assumptions 
including assumptions as to general business and economic conditions in the U.S. and Canada, as well as 
other  factors  management  believes  are  appropriate  in  the  circumstances.    Such  forward-looking 
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that any of the events 
anticipated by such statements will occur or, if they do occur, what benefit the Company will derive from 
them.  A number of factors could cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially 
from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including those matters described 
in  the  2010  annual  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  under  “Risks  and  Uncertainties”  and  in 
Interfor’s current Annual Information Form.  Accordingly, readers should exercise caution in relying upon 
forward-looking statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise them to reflect 
subsequent events or circumstance, except as required by law. 

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS 

We  are  one  of  the  Pacific  Northwest’s  largest  producers  of  quality  wood  products  for  sale  to  markets 
around  the  world.    We  have  operations  in  British  Columbia  (“B.C.”),  Washington  and  Oregon,  including 
two  sawmills  in  the  Coastal  region  of  B.C.,  three  in  the  B.C.  Interior,  two  in  Washington  and  two  in 
Oregon.  We also operate a value-added remanufacturing facility in Washington.  

Our  Company  was  incorporated  under  the  Company Act  (British  Columbia)  on  May  6,  1963.    On 
December 1, 1979 we amalgamated with our subsidiary, Whonnock Forest Products Limited.  On January 
1,  1988  we  changed  our  name  from  Whonnock  Industries  Limited  to  International  Forest  Products 
Limited.  On February 10, 2006 we transitioned under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia).  
Our head office as well as our registered and records offices are located at Suite 3500, 1055 Dunsmuir 
Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7X 1H7. 

In  this  document,  a  reference  to  the  “Company”,  “Interfor”,  “we”  or  “our”  means  International  Forest 
Products Limited and its predecessors and all our subsidiaries.  Our major subsidiary, Interfor Pacific Inc., 
owns and operates our U.S. sawmills.  It is wholly owned and is incorporated in the State of Washington.  
Other  wholly  owned  subsidiaries  whose  operations  are  described  below  are  CEDARPRIME  Inc. 
(incorporated  in  the  State  of  Washington),  and  Interfor  Japan  Ltd.  (incorporated  in  British  Columbia).  
Effective  January  5,  2011,  Seaboard  Shipping  Company  Limited  became  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of 
Interfor. 

HISTORY AND RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS 

Our business originated in the 1930’s with a sawmill in Whonnock, about 48 kilometres east of Vancouver 
B.C.    Since  that  time,  we  have  made  significant  investments  to  expand,  upgrade  and  diversify  our 
production  facilities  and  timber  base  through  capital  programs  and  the  acquisition  of  manufacturing 
plants and timber resources from other companies. 

2007 

2007  was  a  very  challenging  year  for  the  Company,  with  a  combination  of  depressed  North  American 
structural lumber prices, a  record-high Canadian dollar, and a 15% export tax.   In addition, a 15 week 

 
 
 
 
 
74 

strike by the United Steel Workers (“USW”) in the second half of 2007 disrupted our B.C. Coastal lumber 
and logging operations.   

In February  2007, the  Company  completed the  installation of a new primary  breakdown line at its Port 
Angeles operation. In late  2007, a new log merchandizer and planer were installed at Port Angeles. By 
year  end,  both  installations  were  generating  targeted  productivity  improvements.    In  April  2007,  the 
Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved the construction of a new sawmill at Adams Lake, 
to replace the existing facility.   

2008 

2008  was  one  of  the  most  difficult  periods  experienced  in  the  lumber  industry  in  recent  history.    The 
unprecedented turmoil in financial markets along with the lowest level of U.S. housing starts in over 50 
years had a significant impact on the Company’s results.  

In July 2008, following a prolonged curtailment, the Company permanently closed its Queensboro sawmill 
division, located in New Westminster, B.C.  The property was sold in the third quarter of 2009 for gross 
proceeds of $30.1 million.  

During  the  course  of  2008,  we  acquired  the  Castlegar,  B.C.  and  Grand  Forks,  B.C.  sawmills,  related 
timber  harvesting  rights  and  other  related  assets  from  Pope  and  Talbot,  Inc.,  and  acquired  the  Beaver 
and Forks sawmill, planer mill and inventories on the Olympic Peninsula, WA from Portac, Inc.   

2009 

2009  saw  extremely  weak  North  American  markets  continue  to  challenge  the  lumber  industry.    The 
turbulence  in  financial  markets,  particularly  in  the  first  half  of  2009,  combined  with  the  historically  low 
levels of U.S. housing starts and strengthening Canadian dollar had a significant impact on the Company’s 
results.   

Important  2009  accomplishments  included  the  completion  and  impressive  ramp-up  of  the  new  Adams 
Lake  sawmill,  a  return  to  positive  EBITDA  for  the  final  two  quarters  of  2009,  and  a  continued  strong 
financial position.  

2010 

2010  provided  many  opportunities  and  successes  for  Interfor,  despite  the  challenges  faced  with 
continued  stagnant  U.S.  housing  starts.    A  refocus  on  export  markets,  particularly  China,  provided 
alternate markets for slower U.S. demand, added upward pressure on North American pricing resulting in 
higher sales values, and supported increased operating rates.   

Important accomplishments in 2010 include: 

• 

• 

the  acquisition  of  a  timber  tenure  in  the  Kamloops  region  from  Weyerhaeuser  Company  Limited  to 
support the increased fibre requirements of the Adams Lake sawmill;  

the  development  of  lumber  and  log  export  markets  to  take  advantage  of  increasing  demand  from 
China and reduce the reliance on U.S. lumber markets;  

•  marked  improvements  to  the  cost  structure  at  the  Castlegar  sawmill  through  changes  in  the 

operating configuration which allowed the mill to restart and contribute to 2010 earnings; and  

• 

a  continued  strong  financial  position  magnified  by  the  return  to  positive  operating  earnings  in  the 
fourth quarter, 2010 for the first time since 2006.   

Strong Financial Position 

Despite  the  extraordinary  challenges  that  the  industry  faced  in  2010,  the  Company  has  continued  to 
maintain  a  strong  financial  position  and  experienced  some  significant  successes.    Interfor  ended  2010 
with net debt of $146.7 million (29.7% of invested capital), up $6.0 million from 2009.  Cash flow from 
operations,  after  working  capital  changes,  for  the  year  was  positive  at  $21.0  million,  significantly 
improved  from  2009  at  $4.8  million.    In  the  fourth  quarter,  2010  the  Company  generated  positive 
operating earnings for the first time in over four years.  

 
 
75 

On  January  15,  2010,  the  Company  amended  and  extended  its  syndicated  credit  facilities.    The  
Revolving  Term  Line  increased  from  $150  million  to  $200  million,  and  the  maturity  date  was  extended 
from April 24, 2011 to February 28, 2012.  The Operating Line remained at $65 million and was extended 
to February 28, 2011.  All other terms and conditions of the lines remain substantially unchanged.   

On August 19, 2010 the Company further amended and extended its existing syndicated credit facilities 
and the maturity of the Revolving Term Line was extended to July 28, 2013 and the Operating Line was 
extended to July 28, 2012. 

In conjunction with the amendments to its credit facilities, the Company repaid and cancelled its existing 
Non-Revolving Term Line of US$35.0 million on January 15, 2010. 

Outlook 

After  navigating  through  the  global  recession  in  relatively  good  shape,  economic  activity  in  Canada 
appears to be transitioning to a more subdued rate of expansion into 2011.   Recovery in the U.S. new 
housing market continues to be stagnant but it does appear that U.S. housing starts may have found a 
floor improving significantly since the historic low of 477,000 units in April 2009.   

There continues to be optimism about the growth of exports to emerging markets, including China as it 
provides a new market to help offset reduced demand in the U.S. and a strong market for lower grade 
products. 

With  the  prospect  of  continuing  challenges  in  the  North  American  markets,  the  Company  continues  its 
disciplined approach to production, inventory management and capital spending and looks to continuing 
to build its relationships with the emerging export markets. 

See our Management Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010, a copy of which is 
available from SEDAR at www.sedar.com. 

MANUFACTURING 

We  operate  nine  sawmills  and  one  remanufacturing  plant  in  B.C.,  Washington  and  Oregon.    These 
operations  produce  a  wide  range  of  products  for  sale  in  North  American  and  offshore  markets.    The 
products range from commodity structural lumber through to specialty products, such as exterior decking 
and  siding,  machine  stress  rated  products,  industrial  timbers  and  a  wide  range  of  appearance  grade 
items.  

 
 
Interfor Sawmills - Capacity 
(based on two-shift operation) 

76 

B.C. Interior: 
Adams Lake: 
Castlegar: 
Grand Forks:  175 MMbf SPF & DFir 

750 MMbf  

325 MMbf DFir & SPF Dimension 
250 MMbf DFir, Cedar & SPF Dimension 

B.C. Coast:  315 MMbf 
Hammond: 
Acorn:   

165 MMbf Cedar Specialty 
150 MMbf Hem & DFir Japan/Specialty 

U.S. Pacific Northwest:  635 MMbf 
Port Angeles:  165 MMbf Hem & DFir Studs 
180 MMbf DFir & Hem Studs 
Molalla:  
120 MMbf Pines, DFir, White Fir Dimension/Specialty 
Gilchrist: 
170 MMbf Hem & DFir, Dimension/Timbers 
Beaver:  

The mills are capable of cutting logs of various species and grades ranging in diameter from 4 inches to 
80 inches. Many of our manufacturing facilities have recently been upgraded and modified to improve the 
matching of timber resources with customers' lumber requirements.   

In addition to improving our manufacturing capability through upgrades, we have increased our efficiency 
and geographic diversity and expanded our capacity through recent additions of sawmills in Washington 
and  B.C.    These  acquisitions  also  enabled  us  to  expand  our  business  while  closing  several  sawmills  for 
which upgrades would not have represented a viable investment. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
77 

Rated capacity and production of lumber, by mill, for each of the periods specified, is set out in the 
following table: 

Sawmills 

B.C. Coast 
   Hammond (2) 

   Acorn (2) 

B.C. Interior 
   Adams Lake (3) 

   Castlegar (4) 

   Grand Forks (4) 

U.S. Pacific Northwest 
   Gilchrist (5) 

   Molalla (6) 

   Port Angeles (5) 

   Beaver (7) 

Sawmills Closed or Sold 
   Queensboro (8) 

   MacKenzie  (9) 

Total 

Present 
Rated 
Capacity (1) 

Number 
of Shifts 
(per day) 

Years ended December 31 
2010   2009      2008       2007      2006 

(millions of board feet) 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

165 

150 

325 

250 

175 

120 

180 

165 

170 

89 

118 

339 

60 

113 

90 

125 

103 

73 

— 

— 

80 

104 

134 

— 

28 

43 

110 

79 

83 

— 

— 

106 

108 

96 

108 

158 

154 

48 

— 

28 

56 

66 

72 

14 

— 

— 

206 

286 

— 

— 

127 

151 

129 

— 

38 

— 

— 

— 

136 

194 

96 

— 

111 

43 

1,700 

1,110 

661 

498 

855 

1,178 

(1)  Based on two shifts per day and 250 operating days per year.  
(2)  Volumes  include  lumber  custom-cut  at  third  party  facilities  under  the  direction  of  Hammond  and  Acorn  management 

amounting to 16.0 million board feet for Hammond and 1.2 million board feet for Acorn in 2010.    

(3)  The old Adams Lake sawmill was closed during 2008.  The new Adams Lake sawmill began production in April 2009. 
(4)  Castlegar and Grand Forks were acquired on April 30, 2008.  Volumes reported are Interfor only.  Castlegar was curtailed 

until July, 2010.  Grand Forks was curtailed from February to September 2009, inclusive. 

(5)  Gilchrist and Port Angeles were acquired on September 1, 2004.  
(6)  Molalla was acquired on May 31, 2005.   
(7)  Beaver was acquired September 30, 2008. 
(8)  Queensboro (formerly Western Whitewood) was curtailed indefinitely in December 2007 and permanently closed in July 

2008.   

(9)  Volumes include custom-cutting. 

B.C. Coast Operations 

Hammond  

The  Hammond  operation  is  located  on  the  Fraser  River  in  Maple  Ridge,  B.C.  The  facility  is  focused  on 
western red cedar and supplies siding, decking, fascia and timbers for both offshore and North American 
markets.  The  facility  consists  of  a  three-line  sawmill,  a  planer  mill  and  dry  kilns.    In  late  2010,  the 
Company spent $2.0 million on a quad upgrade. 

Acorn 

The Acorn operation is located on leased land in Delta, B.C.  The facility consists of a log dewatering and 
merchandizing system, a sawmill, a planer mill and dry kilns.  The sawmill specializes in sizes and grades 
of lumber for use in Japanese traditional housing made primarily from hemlock and Douglas-fir logs. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
78 

B.C. Interior Operations 

Adams Lake 

Adams  Lake  is  located  near  Kamloops,  B.C.    The  mill  manufactures  kiln-dried  lumber  for  the  U.S.  and 
Canadian  construction  markets  as  well  as  for  offshore  markets.    Adams  Lake  has  the  capability  to  cut 
Douglas-fir  as  well  as  spruce-pine-fir  (“SPF”),  western  red  cedar,  and  hemlock.    In  2003,  a  planer  and 
sorter were installed at a cost of $6.8 million and an additional dry kiln was constructed at a cost of $1.0 
million.    In  2006  and  2007  we  spent  $32.1  million  on  an  energy  system,  new  hog  and  barker  and 
infrastructure improvements to facilitate further growth and cost savings.     

In 2007, to  complete the  overall plan  for the  site, the Company  commenced the construction of a new 
sawmill at Adams Lake.  Construction was completed on time at a cost of $100.3 million.  The first line 
was  commissioned  in  December  2008,  had  an  extremely  successful  start-up  and  commenced  full 
operation  on  April  20,  2009  on  a  one-shift  basis,  and  has  steadily  increased  operating  hours  and 
productivity since.  This mill has a two-shift capacity of 325 MMbf. 

The new mill has been specifically designed to match the current and future timber resource in the area 
and  to  address  the  challenges  of  sawing  timber  affected  by  the  Mountain  Pine  Beetle.    The  mill 
incorporates proven technology that materially improves the operating efficiency and cost structure of the 
Adams Lake operation.  

In 2010, Interfor acquired a timber tenure in the Kamloops region from Weyerhaeuser Company Limited 
to  support  the  increased  fibre  requirements  of  the  Adams  Lake  sawmill,  adding  approximately  275,000 
m³ of annual allowable cut.   

Grand Forks 

Our Grand Forks mill was acquired April 30, 2008 as part of our purchase of Pope and Talbot’s southern 
B.C.  assets.    The  mill  is  located  in  the  southern  interior  of  B.C.  approximately  100  kilometres  from 
Castlegar on a 75 acre  site.  We also acquired timber tenures with an allowable annual  cut  of 502,000 
m3.  The two line mill manufactures kiln dried lumber for the U.S. and Canadian construction markets as 
well  as  the  housing  market  in  Japan.    Grand  Forks  cuts  60%  SPF  and  40%  fir-larch.    In  2006,  the 
previous  owner  completed  a  modernization  and  upgrade  of  the  sawmill  with  a  new  planermill  and  two 
new thermal oil kilns.  

Castlegar 

Our  Castlegar  facilities  were  acquired  April  30,  2008  as  part  of  our  purchase  of  Pope  and  Talbot’s 
southern  B.C.  assets.    In  addition  to  timber  tenures  with  an  allowable  annual  cut  of  491,000  m3,  the 
facility  includes  a  sawmill,  dry  kilns  and  planer  and  manufactures  fir-larch,  SPF,  cedar  and  hemlock 
dimension  lumber.    The  operation  includes  a  complete  transportation  system  for  moving  logs  on  Arrow 
Lake.    The  operation  of  the  mill  was  curtailed  from  February,  2008  through  June,  2010  due  to  poor 
market  conditions  and  an  unfavourable  cost  structure.    Marked  improvements  to  the  cost  structure 
through  changes  in  the  operating  configuration  achieved  with  the  support  of  the  mill’s  employees  and 
other local stakeholders allowed the mill to restart in July, 2010. 

U.S. Operations 

Gilchrist 

The Gilchrist mill is located in Gilchrist, Oregon on approximately 140 acres.  In 2001 the previous owner 
completed  modernization  of  the  facility  to  efficiently  convert  small  diameter  logs.    The  mill  primarily 
processes  lodgepole  pine,  ponderosa  pine  and  white  fir  to  produce  a  wide  range  of  specialty  and 
dimension lumber products.  The mill has an on-site cogeneration plant to produce electricity for its own 
use  as  well  as  steam  for  its  dry  kilns.    At  this  location,  we  own  and  operate  a  short  line  railroad  to 
connect to a mainline for shipment of lumber and chips and to deliver logs to the mill.  In 2005 and 2006 
we  installed  six  new  dry  kilns  at  a  cost  of  US$5.7  million  to  replace  obsolete  kilns  and  increase  drying 
capacity.   

 
 
79 

Port Angeles 

The Port Angeles mill was newly constructed in 1998.  It is situated in Port Angeles, Washington on a 64 
acre  site  near  a  major  highway  and  waterways  which  are  convenient  for  shipping  lumber  and  chips  as 
well  as  for  receiving  logs  at  the  mill.    The  mill  primarily  processes  hemlock  and  Douglas-fir  logs  to 
produce  stud  dimension  lumber  for  the  U.S.  market  but  is  also  capable  of  producing  metric  sizes  for 
export.  In 2005, we modified the dry kilns at a cost of US$1.1 million to increase drying capacity.  We 
also  installed  a  new  planer  grade  optimizer,  trimmer  and  sorter  at  a  cost  of  US$5.0  million  to  increase 
planer capacity and significantly reduce planing costs.  In 2006 and 2007, we constructed a new primary 
saw line at a cost of US$18.3 million to increase recovery and lumber production.  In October 2007, we 
installed a new log merchandiser, planer and planer infeed at a total cost of US$5.8 million.  

Beaver  

The  Beaver  sawmill  consists  of  a  single  line  20’  dimension  sawmill  on  a  45  acre  owned  site  originally 
constructed in 1991 by Portac Inc.  We acquired the assets on September 30, 2008.  The boiler, dry kilns, 
and  planermill  are  situated  approximately  15  kilometres  south  of  the  sawmill  on  a  29  acre  site  leased 
from the City of Forks.  The operation is 75 kilometres west of our Port Angeles facility and is a strong 
strategic  fit  with  that  operation.    The  mill  has  traditionally  produced  hemlock,  Douglas-fir  and  spruce 
products  for  domestic  markets.    Recently  we  have  added  some  export  products  to  complement  the 
domestic programs. 

Molalla 

The Molalla mill was acquired in May 2005.  It is located in Molalla, Oregon approximately 50 kilometres 
southeast  of  Portland.    The  mill  primarily  processes  hemlock  and  Douglas-fir  logs  to  produce  stud 
dimension lumber for the U.S. market.  The mill’s machine centres were fully optimized by the previous 
owners.    A  number  of  infrastructure  improvements  were  undertaken  in  2005  and  2006  at  a  cost  of 
US$5.8 million.   In  2006,  we also completed the construction of two dry  kilns for US$2.4 million and a 
new planermill complex with grade optimization for US$10.3 million.   

Cedarprime  

CEDARPRIME  Inc.  is  located  on  leased  premises  in  Sumas,  Washington  approximately  one  kilometre 
south  of  the  Canada/U.S.  border.    The  plant  has  a  siding  line,  chop  line,  planing  and  finger-jointing 
equipment  as  well  as  access  to  on-site  dry  kilns  enabling  it  to  produce  20  million  board  feet  of  finger-
jointed and cut-stock products for both offshore and North American markets.  Some of the products are 
sold under the brand name CEDARPRIME®. 

SALES, MARKETING AND COMPETITIVE POSITION 

The markets for the Company’s products are highly competitive on a global basis and producers compete 
primarily on the basis of price.  In addition, a majority of Interfor’s lumber production is sold in markets 
where Interfor competes against many producers of approximately the same or larger capacity.  Some of 
Interfor’s  competitors  have  greater  financial  resources  than  the  Company  and  a  number  may  be,  in 
certain product lines, lower cost producers than Interfor. 

 
 
 
The  following  table  shows  our  lumber  sales  by  geographic  area  and  total  sales  by  product  line  for  the 
past five years: 

80 

2010 

2009 

Years ended December 31 
2008 
(thousands of dollars) 

2007 

2006 

Lumber 
  — Canada  

  — U.S.A 

  — Japan 

  — China 

  — Other export 

Offshore transportation and handling 

Logs 

Wood chips and other by-products 

Contract services and other 

$  70,247 

$  40,886 

$  45,996 

$  76,909 

$  102,996 

214,965 

135,576 

139,394 

65,314 

61,384 

40,437 

29,636 

48,726 

16,305 

34,369 

12,765 

481,983 

288,627 

79,763 

56,217 

7,655 

60,443 

34,349 

6,356 

35,766 

3,251 

61,554 

11,473 

297,434 

103,620 

30,610 

5,557 

241,398 

46,237 

282 

57,873 

11,769 

434,468 

118,571 

50,260 

7,709 

393,222 

59,235 

222 

55,480 

14,397 

625,552 

103,250 

41,868 

53,769 

Total sales 

$625,618 

$389,775 

$437,221 

$611,008 

$824,439 

Lumber Sales 

Lumber is similar to many  other commodities in that  demand is  cyclical. Factors such as interest rates, 
exchange rates, freight rates, government tariff and import policies, and demand for housing affect the 
demand for lumber.  In recent years, the residential repair and remodeling market in North America has 
become  a  significant  consumer  of  lumber  and  has  lessened  the  impact  of  fluctuations  in  new  housing 
starts.    In  order  to  diminish  the  impact  of  rapid  cyclical  changes  in  any  one  market,  we  strategically 
target worldwide markets and maintain product diversification.  The Company has a particular customer 
and product base in various countries, providing us with a diversified sales profile, including targeting the 
rapidly  growing  Wood  Frame  Construction  market  in  China.    Product  and  market  diversification  is 
particularly important for B.C. Coast producers where the variability inherent in the log resource produces 
a much wider spectrum of product sizes and quality  than is the case in the B.C. Interior or U.S. Pacific 
Northwest (the “PNW”).  A continuing priority for us is to develop products and markets that more fully 
realize the potential for higher grades, special dimensions and value-added items.   

Lumber sales and marketing activities are organized into two sales groups to leverage global expertise:  i) 
Export and ii) North American Sales Groups.  Interfor Japan Ltd., with an office in Tokyo, has developed 
niche  markets  and  has  increased  sales  directly  to  end  users.    We  also  have  an  office  in  France.    The 
major market for our cedar lumber continues to be North America where markets are serviced through a 
combination of regional wholesale distributors and direct retail sales.  Gains have been made, however, in 
diversifying  cedar  sales  into  offshore  markets  in  Europe,  China,  Japan,  and  Australia.    North  American 
dimension  and  stud  lumber  produced  in  Canada  and  the  U.S.  is  sold  out  of  our  office  in  Bellingham, 
Washington to leverage our U.S. expertise and to provide a more diverse customer base for the Canadian 
mills in terms of geographic and market sectors. 

 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following graph shows the percentage of lumber sales revenue to our major markets in the past five 
years:       

81 

Geographic Distribution of Lumber Revenues

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

Log Sales 

Pacif ic Rim

China

Europe & Other

Japan

United States

Canada

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

We purchase and sell logs in order to obtain the appropriate size, grade, and species of log to suit market 
conditions  and  each  mill’s  cutting  preferences.    We  buy  or  trade  logs  through  agreements  and  open 
market transactions and sell logs that are either unsuitable for cutting or in excess of our manufacturing 
requirements.  

Wood Chip and Sawmill Residuals Sales 

As a by-product of lumber production, our sawmills produce wood chips.  Essentially all of our wood chips 
produced in B.C. are sold under short and long-term contracts to pulp producers.  In general, wood chips 
produced  on  the  B.C.  Coast  are  sold  at  prices  related  to  current  Northern  Bleached  Softwood  Kraft 
(“NBSK”) pulp prices, while the wood chips produced in the B.C. Interior are sold at current market prices 
for chips. 

Chips  from  our  Washington  and  Oregon  operations  are  sold  to  pulp  producers  or  fibre  board 
manufacturers under short-term arrangements. 

DISTRIBUTION 

We  use  various  modes  of  surface  transportation  to  deliver  our  lumber  products.    Shipments  to  export 
markets are made in container and breakbulk vessels while shipments of lumber within North America are 
made  by  truck  and  rail.    The  majority  of  breakbulk  shipments  are  carried  by  Seaboard  International 
Shipping  Company  Limited  (Barbados)  which  is  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  Seaboard  Shipping 
Company  Limited  in  which  we  have  a  60.5%  interest  as  at  December  31,  2010.    Chips  and  logs  are 
normally delivered by tug and barge or by truck.  In Gilchrist, Oregon, and in Grand Forks, B.C., we own 
short line railroads to connect to mainlines for shipping lumber and chips. 

In January, 2011 Seaboard Shipping Company Limited became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Interfor.  

 
 
 
 
 
82 

TIMBER SUPPLY 

British Columbia 

The  Province  of  British  Columbia  (the  “Crown”)  owns  about  95%  of  the  timberlands  from  which  the 
majority  of  timber  is  harvested.    The  remaining  5%  of  timberland  is  private  land  which  is  primarily 
located on Vancouver Island and held by a few large industrial forest landowners. 

The Province provides for the use of Crown forest land through the granting of various forms of timber 
tenures.    These  tenure  agreements  provide  timber  harvesting  rights  in  exchange  for  management 
obligations and stumpage fees payable to the Crown. 

Our  timber  supply  needs  are  met  by  a  combination  of  internal  logs  harvested  from  our  own  timber 
tenures,  long-term  trade  and  supply  agreements,  and  by  purchases  on  the  open  market.    When 
operating  at  normal  capacity,  our  mills  in  BC  would  require  approximately  one-third  of  their  log  supply 
from external sources.   

We hold various Forest Licence (“FL”), Tree Farm Licence (“TFL”) and Timber Licence (“TL”) tenures that 
currently provide for an allowable annual cut (“AAC”) of approximately of 3.7 million cubic metres (m3).  
The  majority  of  Interfor’s  tenures  are  long-term  (15  and  25  year)  renewable  agreements  that  are 
generally replaced every five years. 

On  the  Coast,  we  harvest  a  variety  of  species  consisting  primarily  of  western  hemlock,  amabilis  fir, 
western red cedar and Douglas-fir.  In the Interior, the species mix consists of SPF, Douglas-fir, fir-larch 
and cedar. The harvest is derived from both old growth and second growth stands. Whereas one-third of 
the harvest currently comes from second growth stands on the coast, this amount is expected to increase 
significantly over the next several decades.  

The following table shows our AAC under our FL and TFL tenures and other cutting rights and the volume 
of  timber  harvested  under  our  FLs  and  TFLs  and  other  cutting  rights  in  each  region  for  the  periods 
specified. They also show the volume of purchases and sales during that period. 

 B.C. Operations 

2011 

Years ended December 31 
2008  2007 

2009 

2010 

2006 

Allowable Annual Cut (1) 
  — Forest Licences 

  — Non Replaceable Forest Licences 

  — Tree Farm Licences 
  — Discretionary Annual Harvest Levels (2) 

(thousands of cubic metres) 

2,701 

2,426 

2,418 

2,084 

2,105 

2,325  

220 

801 

40 

313 

854 

40 

313 

867 

40 

375 

196 

40 

155 

262 

40 

155 

272  

     65   

3,762 

3,633 

3,638 

2,695 

2,562 

2,817 

Log Production 

  — Coast 

  — Interior 

Total Log Production 

Log Purchases 

Log Sales 

1,522 

1,139 

2,661 

1,081 

1,754 

1,655 

214 

127 

112 

1,295 

1,881 

1,767 

2,082 

   299 

2,381 

1,343 

794 

447 

1,316 

1,487 

1,081 

919 

1,319 

1,223 

1,190 

(1)  AAC status at the beginning of each year (includes a provision for non-recoverable fibre). 
(2)  Volumes not included in AAC. 

U.S. Pacific Northwest 

Timber supply in the PNW is sourced from a broad distribution of forest land ownership (forest industrial 
lands;  small  private  landowners;  and  State  and  Federal  lands).    These  sources  represent  a  long-term 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
83 

supply  base  from  which  mills  purchase  their  timber  supply.    About  70%  of  the  log  supply  in  the  PNW 
comes from land that is owned by industrial and small private landowners, while the remainder is sourced 
from State, Federal and tribal lands. 

Our  timber  supply  requirements  in  Washington  are  heavily  weighted  to  western  hemlock  with  smaller 
volumes of Douglas-fir and sitka spruce. In Molalla, the specie mix is weighted to Douglas-fir with smaller 
volumes  of  western  hemlock  and  white  fir.  Both  the  Washington  mills  and  Molalla  depend  on  private 
industrial  landowners  and  small  private  landowners  for  the  majority  of  their  supply.  This  timber  is 
supplemented with State, Federal, and tribal volumes in the case of the Washington mills. 

In  Gilchrist,  log  purchases  consist  primarily  of  lodgepole  pine,  ponderosa  pine  and  white  fir  that  have 
come  from  second  growth  harvesting  and  the  thinning  of  young  stands  from  surrounding  National 
Forests.   

The total 2011 log supply requirement for the mills in the U.S. is projected to be supplied from various 
sources, estimated to be as follows:   

U.S. Pacific Northwest Operations 

State and Federal Lands 

Industrial Lands 

Private Lands 

Expected Sources of Timber 2011 
   45%  

46 

  9 

100% 

Forestry and Logging in B.C.   

Forest  and  timber  harvesting  operations  on  Crown  land  in  B.C.  are  regulated  under  the  B.C. 
Government’s Forest and Range Practices Act (British Columbia)  and  the Forest Act (British Columbia).  
The  Government  is  responsible  for  setting  the  AAC,  approving  forest  development  plans  and  cutting 
permits, determining the stumpage system and managing compliance and enforcement.  

Our  Company  is  required  to  manage  forest  resources  under  our  tenures  in  accordance  with  the 
requirements of the applicable laws and regulations.  Forest management of our tenures is guided by a 
team  of  forest  professionals  that  are  engaged  in  a  wide  array  of  activities  such  as  resource  planning, 
forest  development,  road  building  and  harvesting,  reforestation,  forest  protection  and  environmental 
certification.  

We  pay  stumpage  to  the  Province  for  timber  harvested  on  Crown  land  according  to  market  pricing 
systems in place on the Coast and in the Interior.  In addition the Crown charges an annual rent based 
on the AAC for each licence to cover general administration and fire preparedness. 

Our Coastal logging operations are widely dispersed in primarily remote locations between Vancouver and 
Prince  Rupert.    Our  woodlands  harvesting  activities  are  performed  entirely  by  independent  logging 
contractors.   

Our  Interior  woodlands  operations  are  located  at  Adams  Lake,  northeast  of  Kamloops,  and  in  the 
Kootenay region at Nakusp and Grand Forks. 

Logging operations are seasonal due to a number of factors including weather, ground conditions and fire 
season closures.  These and other factors are described in the Selected Quarterly Financial Information 
section  of  our  Management  Discussion  and  Analysis  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2010,  a  copy  of 
which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.  

 
 
        
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 

Our acquisitions and capital expenditures on sawmill and logging operations and timber holdings are as 
shown in the following table: 

84 

2010 

Years ended December 31 
2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

Acquisitions 
Land, buildings, equipment 
  — Manufacturing 
  — Forestry and logging 

(thousands of dollars) 

— 
— 

— 
— 

$52,885 
— 

— 
— 

— 
— 

Logging roads and timber 

          — 

          — 

40,148 

          — 

          — 

          — 

          — 

$93,033 

          — 

          — 

Other capital expenditures 
Land, buildings, equipment 
  — Manufacturing and other 
  — Forestry and logging 

Logging roads and timber 

$10,897 
15 

31,398 

42,310 

$20,752 
29 

6,811 

27,592 

$72,911 
1,365 

17,512 

91,788 

$47,948 
130 

28,340 

76,418 

$71,176 
733 

18,694 

90,603 

Total 

$42,310 

$27,592 

$184,821 

$76,418 

$90,603 

Our capital expenditures over the five years ended December 31, 2010 were financed through internally 
generated funds, through our bank lines and through proceeds generated from the sale of surplus land 
and other non-core and surplus logging and manufacturing assets. 

HUMAN RESOURCES 

  The  United  Steel Workers  (USW) 

In B.C., we directly employ approximately 950 people in our logging and manufacturing operations and 
corporate  offices. 
for 
approximately 500 of these people.  The agreement with the USW for the B.C. Coast expired on June 14, 
2010,  while  the Southern  Interior  USW  agreement  expired  on  June  30,  2009.    The  Canadian  Marine 
Service  Guild (CMSG)  represents  16  employees,  and  their  collective  agreement  expires  September  30, 
2011.    Negotiations  with  the  USW  regarding  renewal  of  the  expired  Southern  Interior  USW  agreement 
are  ongoing,  but  employees  continue  to  work  under  the  terms  of  the  expired  agreement  with  no 
workplace disruptions. 

the  certified  bargaining  agent 

is 

In the  U.S., we employ approximately 415 employees in our sawmill and remanufacturing  operations in 
Washington and Oregon and in our office located in Bellingham, Washington.   

Our employees are governed by a Policy Manual, including a Code of Conduct, Environment Policy, Health 
and Safety Policy, Disclosure Policy, Whistleblower Policy, Financial Reporting Policy, Internet, Email and 
Computer  Use  Policy,  Compensation  Policy,  and  Insider  Trading  Policy.    The  Code  of  Conduct  may  be 
found  on  SEDAR  at  www.sedar.com.    The  Environment  and  Safety  Policies  are  described  below.  
Employees  are  also  protected  by  a  Privacy  Policy.    Our  employees,  management  and  directors  have 
adopted the following Core Values: 

 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
85 

Core Values 

We will conduct ourselves with honesty, integrity and professionalism. 

•  People:   

•  Safety:   

People are the foundation of our business.  

Safety is a prerequisite for work. 

•  Environment:   

Environmental integrity must be maintained in everything we do. 

•  Customers: 

Customers pay our way. 

•  Shareholders: 

Returns to our shareholders facilitate investment, employment, and  
public benefits. 

We Are Responsible For Our Own Success 

HEALTH AND SAFETY 

Our  Health  and  Safety  Policy  embodies  our  commitment  to  the  health,  safety  and  well-being  of  all 
employees. 

Our  Board  approved  the  policy  and  established  a  committee  of  the  Board  to  monitor  these  safety 
commitments.  The Environment and Safety Committee of the Board (the “E&S Committee”) is mandated 
to  monitor  the  implementation  and  maintenance  of  our  policy  of  ongoing  commitment  to  health  and 
safety values and principles with continuous operational improvement.  The E&S Committee ensures that 
our management develops, implements and maintains a comprehensive safety program.  

Safety is a core value for us.  We maintain an active and comprehensive safety program at each of our 
operations.   

We  continued  to  make  good  progress  at  each  of  our  operations  and  our  injury  metrics  in  2010  were 
comparable  to  2009.   Our  Medical  Incident  Rate  (“MIR”)  increased  to  3.2  from  2.5  and  our  Lost  Time 
Accident (“LTA”) frequency decreased to 1.1 from 1.2 when compared to 2009.  

Health and Safety Policy 

Health and Safety is the uncompromised right and responsibility of all employees. 

•  We will integrate Health and Safety into our business with the knowledge that all accidents 

are preventable. 

•  We will hold all levels of management accountable for providing a safe work environment 

and enforcing safe work practices, including timely follow-up of safety incidents. 

•  We will train all employees to identify hazards and to protect themselves and fellow workers. 

•  We will hold all employees and contractors working for Interfor accountable for following  

safe work practices and reporting unsafe acts and conditions. 

•  We will use audits to measure and improve our Health and Safety performance. 

•  We will actively involve our employees in effective Safety programs. 

•  We will operate in compliance with Health and Safety Regulations. 

•  We will monitor and report regularly on our Health and Safety performance.  

International Forest Products Limited is committed to the health, safety, and well being of all 
employees. 

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
86 

THE ENVIRONMENT 

Our Environmental Policy embodies our commitment to responsible stewardship of the environment.  

Our Board approved the policy and established a committee of the Board to monitor our commitment to 
principles, values and policies on environment matters. 

Management has implemented an environmental compliance program.   Audits are performed regularly in 
both the woodlands and manufacturing operations to verify its effectiveness.   

Our  Coast  and  Adams  Lake  woodlands  have  been  certified  to  the  Sustainable  Forestry  Initiative® 
Program  (“SFI”)  as  an  international  standard  for  certification  of  forest  land.  The  SFI  program  is  a 
comprehensive  system  of  principles,  objectives  and  performance  measures  that  combine  the  perpetual 
growing and harvesting of trees with the protection of wildlife, plants, soil and water quality.   

Interfor has obtained Forest Stewardship Council certification in the mid-coast Timber Supply Area as part 
of the Coast Forest Conservation Initiative.   

We  maintain  an  Environmental  Management  System  (“EMS”)  for  all  of  our  manufacturing  facilities.  The 
EMS  provides  a  structure  for  identifying,  addressing  and  managing  environmental  issues.  Each 
manufacturing  business  unit  is  responsible  for  compliance  and  ensuring  the  EMS  is  functioning  as 
intended.  

We  have  also  received  Chain-of-Custody  certification  that  tracks  certified  logs  coming  from  sustainable 
forests through the manufacturing process for certain mills.   

We  are  a  global  leader  in  environmental  management  through  the  application  of  science–based 
principles, collaborative approaches, sustainable forest practices and independent certifications.  We were 
a  recipient  of  the  2000  Millennium  Business  Award  from  the  United  Nations  Environmental  Programme 
and  the  International  Chamber  of  Commerce,  a  co-recipient  of  World  Wildlife  Fund’s  Gift  to  the  Earth 
award in 2007 and a recipient of an  SFI Conservation Leadership award in  2009 for a partnership with 
Aboriginal people along British Columbia’s Pacific Coast. 

Additional information about our environmental work, audit summaries and Forest Sustainability Report is 
available on our website at www.interfor.com.  

We are committed to responsible stewardship of the environment. 

Environment Policy 

•  We will minimize environmental impact, prevent pollution and strive for continuous 

improvement of our environmental performance. 

•  We will operate in compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to the environment. 

•  We will regularly review our practices and procedures to monitor and report on 

environmental performance. 

•  We will provide training for employees and contractors in environmentally responsible work 

practices. 

•  We will manage our forest resources in a sustainable manner that is environmentally 

appropriate, socially beneficial and economically viable. 

•  We will promote the use of our wood products as a good choice for the environment. 

 
 
 
 
 
87 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 

We contribute to and participate in industry research organizations that have made numerous technical 
developments beneficial to us in areas such as sawing technology, drying techniques, and anti-sapstain 
applications. We also are committed to applied research and development in the areas of environment, 
health and safety, forest management and product and market development.  We also conduct product 
and market research on our own in Canada and the U.S.  

CAPITAL STRUCTURE 

The authorized share structure of the Company consists of: 

•  100,000,000 Class “A” Subordinate Voting shares without par value (“Subordinate Voting 

Shares”); 

•  1,700,000 Class “B” Common shares without par value (“Multiple Voting Shares”); and 

•  5,000,000 Preference shares without par value issuable in series with such special rights and 
restrictions as the Directors of the Company may determine before issue thereof (“Preference 
Shares”).   

The Subordinate Voting Shares and Multiple Voting Shares are referred to as “Equity Shares”. 

Subordinate Voting Shares 

The holders of Subordinate Voting Shares are entitled to non-cumulative preferential dividends of 13 1/3 
cents  per  annum  for  each  share  in  priority  to  any  dividends  paid  on  the  Multiple  Voting  Shares  and  to 
further participate, share for share with the Multiple Voting Shares, in any dividends paid on the Equity 
Shares  for  any  fiscal  year  after  13  1/3  cents  per  share  has  been  paid  or  set  aside  for  payment  on  the 
Subordinate Voting Shares. The holders of  Subordinate Voting  Shares are entitled to one vote for each 
share and the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares are entitled, as a class, to elect one member of 
the Board and if there are no Multiple Voting Shares outstanding, are entitled to elect the entire Board 
except  in  certain  circumstances  where  the  holders  of  Preference  Shares  are  entitled  to  elect  two 
Directors. 

The  provisions  relating  to  the  Subordinate  Voting  Shares  may  not  be  varied  unless  sanctioned  by  a 
special resolution of the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares and the Multiple Voting Shares voting 
together and by separate resolutions of the respective holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares and the 
Multiple Voting Shares, the special resolution and separate resolutions in each case requiring a majority 
of three-fourths of the votes cast. 

In  the  event  of  liquidation,  dissolution  or  winding-up  of  the  Company  or  any  other  distribution  of  its 
assets,  holders  of  Subordinate  Voting  Shares  are  entitled  to  declared  and  unpaid  dividends  prior  to  the 
holders  of  the  Multiple  Voting  Shares  and  thereafter  to  participate,  share  for  share,  with  the  Multiple 
Voting Shares, subject to all rights of the holders of Preference Shares. 

Multiple Voting Shares 

The  holders  of  Multiple  Voting  Shares  are  entitled  to  participate,  share  for  share,  with  the  Subordinate 
Voting Shares, in any dividends paid for any fiscal year after 13 1/3 cents has been provided for payment 
on the Subordinate Voting Shares.  The holders of Multiple Voting Shares are entitled to ten votes on a 
poll  for  each  share  held  and  the  holders  of  Multiple  Voting  Shares  are  entitled,  as  a  class,  to  elect  all 
members of the Board except one member to be elected by the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares 
and, in certain circumstances, two Directors to be elected by the holders of Preference Shares. 

In  the  event  of  liquidation,  dissolution,  or  winding-up  of  the  Company  or  any  distribution  of  its  assets, 
holders of Multiple Voting Shares are entitled after payment of any declared and unpaid dividends on the 
Subordinate Voting Shares to participate, share for share, with the Subordinate Voting Shares, subject to 
all rights of the holders of Preference Shares. 

 
 
88 

Any  holder  of  Multiple  Voting  Shares  is  entitled  at  any  time  to  exchange  his  Multiple  Voting  Shares  for 
Subordinate Voting Shares on a share for share basis without adjustment for any unpaid dividends. 

The  provisions  relating  to  the  Multiple  Voting  Shares  may  not  be  varied  unless  sanctioned  by  a  special 
resolution of the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares and the Multiple Voting Shares voting together 
and by separate resolutions of the respective holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares and the Multiple 
Voting Shares, the special resolution and separate resolutions in each case requiring a majority of three-
fourths of the votes cast. 

In  the  event  of  any  subdivision,  consolidation,  or  conversion  of  either  Subordinate  Voting  Shares  or 
Multiple Voting Shares, an appropriate adjustment is to be made in the rights and conditions attaching to 
the Subordinate Voting Shares and the Multiple Voting Shares to preserve the benefits conferred on the 
holders of each class. 

Rights on Take-Over Bids and Conversion of Multiple Voting Shares 

Any transfer of a Multiple Voting Share: 

a.  by  any  of  W.L.  Sauder’s  executors,  administrators,  or  other  trustee  or  legal  representative  with 
respect  to  his  personal  estate,  members  of  his  immediate  family,  their  descendants  and  controlled 
companies  (collectively  the  “Controlling  Shareholder  Group”)  to  any  person  other  than  another 
member  of  the  Controlling  Shareholder  Group  or  a  person  (the  “Qualified  Purchaser”)  who  is 
acquiring a majority of the outstanding Multiple Voting Shares and who makes an offer to purchase 
all  outstanding  Subordinate  Voting  Shares,  Preference  Shares,  and  Multiple  Voting  Shares  at  an 
equivalent price; or 

b.  by a Qualified Purchaser to any person other than another Qualified Purchaser,  

will result in the automatic conversion of the Multiple Voting Shares into Subordinate Voting Shares. 

The Multiple Voting Shares will be automatically converted into Subordinate Voting Shares if: 

a. 

b. 

the Controlling Shareholder Group or a Qualified Purchaser ceases to beneficially own more than 50% 
of the issued and outstanding Multiple Voting Shares; or 

the Controlling Shareholder Group or a Qualified Purchaser ceases to beneficially own equity shares 
carrying at least 9.2 million votes, subject to adjustments upon: (i) the subdivision, consolidation, or 
reclassification of any outstanding equity shares, or (ii) the issue of equity shares by way of a stock 
dividend other than an ordinary course stock dividend. 

Preference Shares 

The Preference Shares of each series rank on a parity with the Preference Shares of every other series, 
and  are  entitled  to  preference  over  the  Equity  Shares  and  over  any  other  shares  ranking  junior  to  the 
Preference Shares with respect to payment of dividends and the distribution of assets of the Company in 
the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding-up of the Company. 

 
 
MARKET FOR SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY 

The Subordinate Voting Shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol IFP.A.  The 
following table sets out the market price ranges and trading volumes for the Subordinate Voting Shares 
on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange  for  each  month  during  2010  (January  1,  2010  through  December  31, 
2010). 

89 

Month 

January 
February 
March 
April 
May 
June 
July 
August 
September 
October 
November 
December 

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) 
2010 Trading Volumes 
Ticker:  IFP.A 

High  

Low  

5.10 
4.90 
5.44 
6.25 
5.60 
5.50 
4.40 
4.30 
4.10 
5.19 
5.27 
5.60 

4.14 
4.10 
4.27 
5.22 
4.90 
3.92 
3.71 
3.21 
3.22 
3.78 
4.33 
4.50 

Volume 

837,283 
2,204,801 
1,282,963 
2,128,620 
1,830,036 
775,663 
520,873 
1,260,196 
1,582,505 
3,574,166 
1,158,547 
1,200,935 

TRANSFER AGENTS 

The transfer agent for our Subordinate Voting Shares is Computershare Investor Services Inc. at its 
principal offices in Vancouver, British Columbia. 

 
 
 
90 

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

Directors as of February 9, 2011 

The  following  table  sets  out  the  Company’s  directors  as  of  February  9,  2011,  their  respective 
municipalities of residence, principal occupations within the past five years and the period during which 
each director has served as a director. 

Name and 
Municipality of Residence 
LAWRENCE I. BELL* 
Vernon, BC, Canada  

Director Since 
April 1998 

Principal Occupations 
Corporate Director 

Non-executive Chairman  
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority  

From 
2007 

To 
Present 

2003 

2007 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 

2001 

2003 

DUNCAN K. DAVIES  
Vancouver, BC, Canada 

November 1998 

President and Chief Executive Officer  
International Forest Products Limited 

President and Chief Operating Officer 
International Forest Products Limited 

HAROLD C. KALKE 
West Vancouver, BC, Canada 

July 2000 

President and Founder 
Kalico Developments Ltd., a real estate development 
and management company 

PETER M. LYNCH 
Toronto, ON, Canada 

October 2006 

Corporate Director 

GORDON. H. MacDOUGALL 
West Vancouver, BC, Canada 

February 2007 

Executive Vice President and Director  
Grant Forest Products Inc. (and its predecessor) 

Vice Chairman and Director  
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd., 
an asset management firm 

2000 

Present 

1998 

2000 

1971 

Present 

2010 

Present 

1993 

2010 

2007 

Present 

Partner 
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management 
Partnership 

1996 

2006 

Head of Portfolio Strategy Team and 
Head of Client Solutions Team 
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd. 

1996 

2006 

J. EDDIE McMILLAN  
Perdido Key, Florida, USA 

October 2006 

Independent Business Consultant 

2002 

Present 

Executive Vice President – Wood Products Group 
Willamette Industries, Inc. 

1998 

2002 

E. LAWRENCE SAUDER 
Vancouver, BC, Canada 

April 1984 

Non-Executive Chairman 
International Forest Products Limited 

Chief Executive Officer 
Sauder Industries Limited, a manufacturer and 
distributor of building products 

Chairman 
Sauder Industries Limited 

Non-executive Chairman  
Hardwoods Distribution Income Fund  

Non-executive Vice Chairman  
International Forest Products Limited 

President 
Sauder Industries Limited 

2008 

Present 

2010 

Present 

2007 

Present 

2008 

Present 

2004 

2008 

1988 

2004 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JOHN P. SULLIVAN 
Vancouver, BC, Canada 

May 2001 

Corporate Director 

Vice President 
International Forest Products Limited 

DOUGLAS W.G.  WHITEHEAD 
North Vancouver, BC, Canada 

April 2007 

Non-Executive Chairman   
Finning International Inc., a distributor of Caterpillar 
products and support services 

91 

2003 

Present 

2001 

2003 

2008 

Present 

President and Chief Executive Officer 
Finning International Inc. 

2000 

2008 

*Lead Director 

To  our  knowledge,  only  one  of  the  Company’s  directors  has  in  the  last  10  years  been  an  officer  or 
director of a company that, while the person was acting in that capacity, was subject to bankruptcy or 
similar proceedings or securities regulatory sanctions described in National Instrument 51-102 Continuous 
Disclosure Obligations.    From  1993  to  2010,  Mr.  Lynch  was  an  executive  director  of  Grand  Forest 
Products Inc. (“Grant Forest”).  On June 25, 2009, Grant Forest filed and obtained protection under the 
Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act in order to restructure its business affairs. 

The term of office for all current directors will end on the day of the next Annual General Meeting of the 
Company’s shareholders.  The next Annual General Meeting is scheduled for May 17, 2011. 

Committees of the Board 

The  Company  currently  has  4  Committees  of  the  Board  of  Directors:    Audit  Committee,  the  Corporate 
Governance & Nominating Committee, the Management Resources & Compensation Committee and the 
Environment & Safety Committee.  The members of each Committee are indicated below. 

Audit 
Committee 

Management 
Resources & 
Compensation 
Committee 

Lawrence I. Bell 

Duncan K. Davies 

Harold C. Kalke 

Peter M. Lynch 

x 

x 

Gordon H. MacDougall 

Chair 

James E. McMillan 

E. Lawrence Sauder 

John P. Sullivan 

X 

X 

X 

Douglas W.G. Whitehead 

x 

Chair 

Corporate 
Governance & 
Nominating 
Committee 
x 

Environment  
& Safety 
Committee 

x 

Chair 

x 

x 

Chair 

x 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
92 

Officers as of February 9, 2011 

The following table sets out the Company’s officers as of February 9, 2011, their respective municipalities 
of residence and their principal occupations for at least the last five years: 

Name and  
Municipality of Residence 

Positions Held 

DUNCAN K. DAVIES  
Vancouver, BC, Canada 

President and Chief Executive Officer 
International Forest Products Limited 

From 

To 

2000 

Present 

JOHN A. HORNING  
West Vancouver, BC, Canada 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary 
International Forest Products Limited 

2007 

Present 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
International Forest Products Limited 

SANDY M. FULTON  
Blaine, Washington, USA 

Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer  
International Forest Products Limited 

Senior Vice President, U.S. Operations 
International Forest Products Limited 

OTTO F. SCHULTE  
Black Creek, BC, Canada 

Vice President, Coastal Woodlands 
International Forest Products Limited 

RICHARD J. SLACO  
Delta, BC, Canada 

Vice President and Chief Forester 
International Forest Products Limited 

STEPHEN D.A. WILLIAMS 
North Vancouver, BC, Canada 

Vice President, Finance and Administration 

Vice President and Corporate Treasurer 
International Forest Products Limited 

2002 

2007 

2007 

Present 

2004 

2007 

2000 

Present 

2002 

Present 

2010 

2006 

Present 

2010 

SHAREHOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

As  at  December  31,  2010,  the  directors  and  officers  of  the  Company  as  a  group  owned,  directly  or 
indirectly,  or  exercised  control  of  or  direction  over  2,674,157  Subordinate  Voting  Shares  representing 
approximately 5.77% of the outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares and 1,011,735 Multiple Voting Shares 
representing  approximately  99.6%  of  the  outstanding  Multiple  Voting  Shares.    In  respect  of  the 
foregoing,  the  outstanding  Multiple  Voting  Shares  are  owned  by  Sauder  Industries  Limited.    Sauder 
Industries Limited is indirectly owned in part by Mr. Sauder, the non-executive Chairman of the Company.  
Mr.  Sauder  controls  or  directs  the  exercise  of  the  voting  rights  attached  to  the  voting  securities  of  the 
Company  held  by  Sauder  Industries  Limited  with  respect  to  routine  matters  such  as  the  election  of 
directors and appointment of auditors. 

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS 

Since the commencement of our most recently completed financial year, and for the three most recently 
completed financial years, no director or executive officer of the Company, no person or company that is 
the direct or indirect beneficial owner of, or who exercises control or direction over, more than 10% of 
the  Company’s  voting  securities  or  any  associate  or  affiliate  of  such  persons,  has  had  any  material 
interest in any transaction involving the Company. 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

We are not a party to, and our property is not the subject of, any material legal proceedings which are 
currently in place or which we know to be contemplated. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
93 

INTEREST OF EXPERTS 

KPMG LLP are the external auditors of the Company and have confirmed that they are independent with 
respect to the Company within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of Institute of Chartered 
Accountants of British Columbia and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder. 

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION 

The Audit Committee Terms of Reference  

The  Audit  Committee  (the  "Committee")  is  appointed  by  the  Board  to  assist  the  Board  in  fulfilling  its 
oversight responsibility relating to:  

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 

the integrity of the Company’s financial statements,  

the financial reporting process,  

the systems of internal accounting and financial controls,  

the professional qualifications and independence of the external auditors,  

the performance of the external auditors, risk management processes,  

financial plans,  

g.  pension plans, and  

h.  compliance by the Company with ethics and legal and regulatory requirements.   

The Committee’s Terms of Reference, attached as Appendix “A” to this Annual Information Form, sets out 
its responsibilities and duties. 

The Committee met 4 times in 2010 in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board meetings. 

Composition of the Audit Committee 

The Committee consists of 4 directors:  Gordon H. MacDougall (Chair), Lawrence I. Bell, Peter M. Lynch 
and  Douglas  W.G.  Whitehead.    Each  Committee  member  is  independent  and  financially  literate  in 
compliance with Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees. 

Relevant Education and Experience 

The following is a brief summary of the education and experience of each member of the Committee that 
is  relevant  to  the  performance  of  his  responsibilities  as  a  member  of  the  Committee,  including  any 
education  or  experience  that  has  provided  the  member  with  an  understanding  of  the  accounting 
principles used by the Company to prepare its annual and interim financial statements. 

Mr. Gordon H. MacDougall 

Mr.  MacDougall  is  the  Chairman  of  the  Committee.    Mr.  MacDougall  is  Vice  Chairman  and  Partner  of 
Connor, Clark & Lunn Investment Management Ltd., an asset management firm.  From 1996 to 2006, he 
was  a  Partner  at  Connor,  Clark  &  Lunn  Investment  Management  Partnership  and  Director,  Head  of 
Portfolio  Strategy  Team  and  Head  of  Client  Solutions  Team  of  Connor,  Clark  &  Lunn  Investment 
Management  Ltd.   He  previously  served  as  lead  director  for  Intrawest  Corporation.   Mr.  MacDougall  is 
currently the Chairman of the Investment Committee and a director of Vancouver Foundation.   

He holds a CFA from the University of Virginia, a MBA from the University of Pittsburgh and a B.Comm. in 
Finance from Sir George Williams University (now Concordia University).   

Mr.  MacDougall  has  served  on  the  Committee  since  April  2007  and  chaired  the  Committee  since  April 
2009. 

 
 
94 

Mr. Lawrence I. Bell 

Mr.  Bell  is  a  Corporate  Director.    In  addition  to  being  a  director  of  the  Company,  he  is  a  director  of 
Goldcorp Inc., Capstone Mining, Silver Wheaton Corp. and Matrix Asset Management Inc.   Mr. Bell is a 
fellow of the Institute of Corporate Directors.  From 2003 until his retirement in 2007, Mr. Bell served as 
the non-executive Chairman of British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority.  From 2001 to 2003, he was 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority.  He has also served 
as the Chairman of the Canada Line (Rapid Transit Project), Chairman of the Board of Governors of the 
University of British Columbia, Chairman and President of the Westar Group and Chief Executive Officer 
of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union.  In addition, he has served on the boards of a number of private 
and public companies, including Kimber Resources Inc., B.C. Gas, Canadian Hunter and Miramar Mining 
Corporation,  and  as  a  trustee  of  Hardwoods  Distribution  Income  Fund.    In  the  British  Columbia  public 
sector, Mr. Bell has served as Deputy Minister of Finance and Secretary to the Treasury Board.   

Mr. Bell holds a M.A. in Economics and has received numerous awards for his public service.   

Mr. Bell has served on the Committee since April 2009. 

Mr. Peter M. Lynch 

Mr.  Lynch  is  a  Corporate  Director.    From  1993  to  2010,  he  was  the  Executive  Vice  President  and  a 
director  of  Grant  Forest  Products  Inc.  (and  its  predecessor),  a  producer  of  OSB  and  engineered  wood 
products.  Prior thereto, he practiced law.   

Mr. Lynch holds a LL.B from Osgoode Law School and is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, 
the Canadian Bar Association and the Ontario Bar Association. 

Mr. Lynch has served on the Committee since April 2009. 

Mr. Douglas W.G. Whitehead 

Mr.  Whitehead  is  currently  the  Chairman  of  Finning  International  Inc.  (“Finning”),  a  distributor  of 
Caterpillar products and support services. From 2000 to 2008, he was the President and Chief Executive 
Officer  of  Finning.    Prior  to  joining  Finning,  Mr.  Whitehead  held  a  number  of  senior  executive  positions 
with  Fletcher  Challenge  Canada,  including  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Senior  Vice  President 
and Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of the Crown Packaging Division.  Mr. Whitehead is also 
currently  a  director  of  Ballard  Power  Systems  Inc.,  Belkorp  Industries  and  Inmet  Mining  Corporation.  
Over  the  years,  he  has  served  as  director  of  Terasen  Inc.,  Fletcher  Challenge  Canada,  Finlay  Forest 
Industries and Timberwest Forest Limited.   

Mr. Whitehead holds a MBA from the University of Western Ontario and a B.Sc. in Engineering from the 
University of British Columbia. 

Mr. Whitehead has served on the Committee since April 2009. 

AUDIT FEES 

The Committee annually recommends the appointment of the Company’s external auditors and approves 
the annual audit plan and compensation of the external auditors for all audit, audit related and non-audit 
services.  In the case of non-audit services, the services and compensation is approved by the Committee 
before the services commence. 

 
 
KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, Vancouver, are the independent auditors of the Company.  Fees paid 
or  accrued  to  KPMG  LLP  for  audit  and  other  services  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2010  and 
December 31, 2009 were as follows: 

95 

Total audit fees  

Audit-related fees (1)  

Tax fees (2)  

All other fees  

TOTAL  

2010 Fees 

2009 Fees 

451,000 

9,300 

266,678 

50,500 

777,478 

392,500 

33,300 

17,875 

36,350 

$ 480,025 

(1)  Audit-related fees consist principally of fees for professional services rendered with respect to audits of a defined benefit 

pension plan, subsidiary companies, and advice and assistance related to accounting issues. 

(2)  Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance services, professional services related to U.S. cross border transfer pricing and 

sales tax. 

CODE OF ETHICS 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees.  A copy of the 
code, entitled “Code of Conduct”, can be found on our website at www.interfor.com. 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

Additional  information  relating  to  the  Company,  including  directors’  and  officers’  remuneration  and 
indebtedness, principal holders of the Company’s securities and securities authorized for issuance under 
equity compensation plans, is contained in the Company’s Information Circular. 

Additional financial information about the Company is provided in the Company’s financial statements and 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

Copies of the documents referred to above are available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com and 
may also be obtained upon request from:   

International Forest Products Limited 
Corporate Secretary 
3500-1055 Dunsmuir Street 
Vancouver, British Columbia,  
Canada, V7X 1H7 
Telephone: 604 689 6800 
Facsimile:   604 689 6825 
E-mail:   info@interfor.com 

Additional information relating to the Company may be found on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
96 

Appendix “A” 

AUDIT COMMITTEE 
Terms of Reference 

PURPOSE  

The Audit Committee has been established by the Board and under powers delegated to it by the Board 
is mandated to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of its 
financial statements in accordance with the Board’s objectives. 

COMPOSITION AND TERM OF OFFICE  

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

The Audit Committee shall consist of four or more Directors.   

All  members  of  the  Audit  Committee  shall  be  independent  within  the  meaning  of  Multilateral 
Instrument 52-110-Audit Committees. 

All members must be financially literate or become financially literate within a reasonable period 
following appointment and at least one member should have accounting or related expertise.   

The  Chairman  of  the  Audit  Committee  along  with  other  Audit  Committee  members  will  be 
appointed annually by the Board following the AGM to hold office until the next AGM, unless the 
member becomes unable to serve or is removed by the Board.  A casual vacancy may be filled 
and additional members may be appointed at any time by the Board to hold office until the next 
AGM.   

5. 

A quorum shall consist of a simple majority. 

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES  

The  Audit  Committee  shall  perform  the  following  functions,  as  well  as  any  other  functions  specifically 
authorized by the Board: 

General 

1. 

2. 

3. 

Schedule regular meetings and meet, at a minimum, four times per year.  Extraordinary meetings 
may be called by any member of the Audit Committee or at the request of the Chairman of the 
Board. 

Appoint a Secretary who shall record the proceedings of the Audit Committee’s meetings. 

Report to the Board activities and recommendations, if any, requiring Board approval. 

Financial Disclosure, Risk Management and Internal Controls 

4. 

Review the following documents before the public disclosure of  same by the Company,  and, if 
appropriate, recommend approval by the Board of the Company’s: 

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

annual and quarterly financial statements;  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis; and 

annual and interim earnings press releases. 

 
 
 
 
97 

The review will involve direct discussions with Management and the Company’s external auditor 
(the “Auditor”), including an opportunity for an in-camera meeting with the Auditor independent 
of Management.  

Review and approve the disclosures required by applicable securities laws to be included in the 
Company’s Annual Information Form and Management Information Circular relating to the Audit 
Committee and audit and non-audit services and fees. 

Review  the  process  for  certification  of  the  interim  and  annual  financial  statements  by  the  CEO 
and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the certification made by the CEO and CFO. 

Review all news releases announcing financial results, containing financial information based on 
unreleased  financial  results  or  non-GAAP  financial  measures  or  providing  earnings  guidance, 
forward-looking  financial  information  and  future-oriented  financial  information  or  financial 
outlooks before the public disclosure of same by the Company. 

Review  financial  information  contained  in  any  prospectus,  take-over  bid  circular,  issuer  bid 
circular,  rights  offering  circular  and  any  other  document  that  the  Audit  Committee  is  to  review 
before the public disclosure of same by the Company, and, if appropriate, recommend approval 
by the Board. 

Review  matters  related to internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  of  the  Company  and  ensure 
the  Company  has  adequate  procedures  in  place  in  respect  thereof.    Ensure  that  the  necessary 
measures are taken to follow up suggestions from the Auditor’s reports. 

Review the principal risks of the Company and ensure that an effective risk management strategy 
is in place. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10. 

Review the Company’s derivatives policies and activities, including details of exposures to banks 
and other counterparties. 

External Auditor 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

Review  and  recommend  to  the  Board  the  appointment  of  the  Auditor  to  be  nominated  for  the 
purposes of preparing or issuing an Auditor’s report and performing other audit, review or attest 
services for the Company. 

Establish the mandate of the Auditor, including the annual engagement, audit plan, audit scope 
and compensation for the audit services, subject to shareholder approval. 

Oversee the activities of the Auditor.  The Auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee. 

Directly  communicate  and  meet  with  the  Auditor,  with  and  without  Management  present,  to 
discuss the results of their examinations. 

Review  the  independence  of  the  Auditor,  any  rotation  of  the  partners  assigned  to  the  audit  in 
accordance with applicable laws and professional standards, the internal quality control findings 
of the Auditor’s firm and peer reviews. 

Review  the  performance  of  the  Auditor,  including  the  relationship  between  the  Auditor  and 
Management and the evaluation of the lead partner of the Auditor. 

Resolve disagreements between Management and the Auditor regarding financial reporting. 

Review material written communications between the Auditor and Management. 

 
 
98 

Non-Audit Services 

19. 

Pre-approve  non-audit  services.    The  Audit  Committee  may  delegate  to  one  or  more  of  its 
members  the  authority  to  pre-approve  non-audit  services.    The  pre-approval  of  non-audit 
services  by  any  member  to  whom  authority  has  been  delegated  shall  be  presented  to  the 
Committee at its first scheduled meeting following such pre-approval. 

Company Policies 

20. 

21. 

Satisfy  itself  that  adequate  procedures  are  in  place  for  the  review  of  the  public  disclosure  of 
financial  information  extracted  or  derived  from  the  Company’s  financial  statements  and 
periodically assess the adequacy of those procedures. 

Establish  and  periodically  review  the  policies  and  procedures  for  the  receipt,  retention  and 
treatment  of  complaints  received  by  the  Company  regarding  accounting,  internal  accounting 
controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submissions by the employees of 
the Company regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.  

22. 

Review  and  approve  the  Company’s  hiring  policies  regarding  partners,  employees  and  former 
partners and employees of the former and present Auditor. 

Insurance 

23. 

Review  the  Company’s  insurance  programs,  including  the  Company’s  directors’  and  officers’ 
insurance coverage, and make recommendations for their renewal or replacement. 

AUTHORITY 

1. 

2. 

The Audit Committee is authorized to engage any outside advisor it deems necessary to carry out 
its  duties  and  responsibilities  and  to  arrange  payment  of  the  advisor’s  compensation  by  the 
Company.   

The Audit Committee may, at the request of the Board or at its own initiative, investigate such 
other matters as it considers appropriate in furtherance of the Audit Committee’s purpose. 

 
 
 
GLOSSARY 

99 

“Adjusted EBITDA” EBITDA less other income and other income of investee company. 

“Allowable  Annual  Cut  (AAC)”  The  average  annual  volume  of  timber  which  the  holder  of  a  licence  from  the 
Province of British Columbia may harvest on Crown land under the licence in a five-year control period. 

“Bone Dry Unit (BDU)” A unit of measurement for wood chips and other sawmill by-products, being equal to 2,400 
pounds. 

“Cash  flow  from  operations”  Cash  generated  from  operations  before  considering  changes  in  operating  working 
capital. 

“Custom cutting” An arrangement under which a mill contracts to cut logs owned by a customer into products of 
specifications defined by the customer. 

“EBITDA”  Earnings  before  interest,  income  taxes,  depletion,  amortization,  restructuring  costs,  other  foreign 
exchange gains and losses, and write-downs of plant and equipment. 

 “Forest Licence” Replaceable, volume-based timber cutting rights for  a specific volume of Crown timber within  a 
Timber Supply area. 

“Invested Capital” The total of bank indebtedness, short term advances from the Seaboard partnership, long-term 
debt and shareholders’ equity. 

“Invested  Capital,  adjusted”  Invested  Capital  less  cash,  deposits  and  short  term  advances  from  the  Seaboard 
partnership. 

“m³” A measure of one cubic metre of solid wood, British Columbia metric scale, as determined under the Forest Act, 
equal to 35.3 cubic feet of solid wood. 

“Mfbm” or “Mbf” One thousand foot board measure equal to one thousand square feet of lumber, one inch thick. 

“Net debt” Total Debt less cash, deposits and short term advances from the Seaboard partnership. 

“Pre-tax return on total assets” Earnings (loss) before taxes, restructuring  costs, other foreign exchange gains 
and  losses,  and  write-downs  of  property,  plant,  equipment  and  timber,  U.S.  duty  refunds,  net  and  Other  income 
divided by closing total assets. 

 “Return  on  average  Invested  Capital,  adjusted”  Net  earnings  (loss)  plus  after  tax  interest  cost  (excluding 
interest income on U.S. duty refund, net of special charge) divided by the average of opening and closing Invested 
Capital, adjusted. 

“Return  on  average  shareholders’  equity”  Net  earnings  (loss)  divided  by  the  average  of  opening  and  closing 
shareholders’ equity. 

 “Silviculture”  The  art  and  science  of  controlling  the  establishment,  growth,  composition,  health  and  quality  of 
forests. 

“Stumpage” A charge assessed by the provincial government on all Crown timber harvested. 

“Sustained yield (sustainable log supply)” The yield that a forest area can produce on an ongoing basis without 
impairment of the long-term productivity of the land. 

“Timber Licence” Non-replaceable, area based, Crown timber cutting rights. 

“Total Debt” The total of bank indebtedness, short-term advances from the Seaboard partnership, long-term debt. 

“Tree  Farm  Licence”  A  renewable  25-year  licence  to  manage  a  forest  area  to  yield  an  annual  harvest  on  a 
sustainable basis. 

“Value-added product” A commodity or other product that has been further processed to increase financial value. 

“Volumetric unit” A unit of measurement for wood chips and other sawmill by-products, being equal to 200 cubic 
feet.  A volumetric unit represents between 60% and 85% of the chips in a Bone Dry Unit, depending on the species. 

“Whitewood” Includes the Coastal species hemlock, Balsam Fir, Douglas-fir and spruce; the term whitewood is used 
on British Columbia Coast to differentiate the above species from Red Cedar and Yellow Cedar. 

 
 
 
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

100 

DIRECTORS 

L.I. Bell (Lead Director) - Vernon, BC 

D.K. Davies - Vancouver, BC 

H.C. Kalke - West Vancouver, BC 

P.M. Lynch - Toronto, ON 

G.H. MacDougall - West Vancouver, BC 

J.E. McMillan - Perdido Key, Florida 

E.L. Sauder (Chairman of the Board) - Vancouver, BC 

J.P. Sullivan - Vancouver, BC 

D.W.G. Whitehead - North Vancouver, BC 

OFFICERS 

E.L. Sauder – Chairman 

D.K. Davies - President and Chief Executive Officer 

J.A. Horning - Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary 

S.M. Fulton - Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 

S.D.A. Williams - Vice President, Finance and Administration 

O.F. Schulte - Vice President, Coastal Woodlands 

R.J. Slaco - Vice President and Chief Forester 

 
 
 
 
 
 
101 

CORPORATE  INFORMATION 

Interfor U.S. Office 
220 - 2211 Rimland Drive 
Bellingham, WA 98226 
Tel: 360- 788-2299 
Fax: 360- 788-2290 

Stock Exchange 
Class “A” shares listed on  
The Toronto Stock 
Exchange 
Symbol:  IFP.A 

Auditors 
KPMG LLP, 
Vancouver, BC 

Transfer Agent 
Computershare 
Investor Services Inc. 
Vancouver, BC and 
Toronto, ON 

SALES & ADMINISTRATION OFFICES 

North America – Whitewood 
220 – 2211 Rimland Drive 
Bellingham, WA 98226 
Tel: 360-788-2200 
Fax: 360-788-2210 

International 
Suite 600-2700 Production Way 
Burnaby, BC, V5A 4X1 
Tel: 604-422-3468 
Fax: 604-422-3250 

Interfor Head Office 
PO Box 49114  
Bentall Tower Four 
3500-1055 Dunsmuir Street 
Vancouver, BC V7X 1H7 
Tel: 604-689-6800 
Fax: 604-688-0313 

North America – Cedar 
20580 Maple Crescent  
Maple Ridge, BC  
Canada, V2X 1B1  
Tel: 604-465-1850 
Fax: 604-465-2230  

Japan 
Kasahara Bldg. 6F, 1-7-7 
Nihonbashi, Ningyocho, Chuo-ku 
Tokyo, Japan 103-0013 
Tel: +81 3 5641 2351  
Fax: +81 3 5641 2383  

Europe 
Z.I. du Port de Nantes 
Chevire Amont, 7, Rue de l'Houmaille 
Bouguenais, France 44340 
Tel: 33 2 40 32 05 25 
Fax: 33 2 40 32 02 25 

Production Way 
Suite 600-2700 Production Way 
Burnaby, BC  V5A 4X1 
604-422-3400 

OPERATIONS AND LOCATIONS 

Acorn 
Sawmill 
9355 Alaska Way  
Delta, BC V4C 4R7 
604-581-0494 

Adams Lake 
Sawmill 
9200 Holding Road 
Chase, BC  V0E 1M2 
250-679-3234 

Avalon 
Log Sorting  
Port Mellon Highway 
Port Mellon, BC  V0N 2S0  
604-884-5300 

Beaver 
Sawmill 
200673 Highway 101 
Beaver, WA 98305 
360-327-3377 

Campbell River 
Coastal Woodlands 
1250-A Ironwood Street 
Campbell River, BC  V9W 6H5 
250-286-1881 

Castlegar  
Sawmill 
PO Box 3728 
2705 Arrow Lakes Drive 
Castlegar, BC  V1N 3W4 
250-365-4400 

CEDARPRIME 
Remanfacturing 
601C West Front Street 
Sumas, WA  98295 
360-988-2120 

Forks 
Planermill 
143 Sitkum Solduc Road 
PO Box 2299  
Forks, WA 98331 
360-374-4347 

Gilchrist 
Sawmill 
#1 Sawmill Road  
Gilchrist, OR  97737 
541-433-2222 

Nakusp  
Castlegar Woodlands 
442 Highway 6 West 
PO Box 2000 
Nakusp, BC  V0G 1R0 
250-265-3741 

Grand Forks  
Sawmill and Woodlands 
570 68th Ave. 
PO Box 39  
Grand Forks, BC  V0H 1H0 
250-443-2400 

Port Angeles 
Sawmill 
243701 Hwy 101 W.  
Port Angeles, WA  98363 
360-457-6266 

Hammond Cedar 
Sawmill 
20580 Maple Crescent 
Maple Ridge, BC  V2X 1B1 
604-465-5401 

Molalla 
Sawmill 
15555 South Highway 211 
Molalla, OR  97038 
503-829-9131 

Sechelt   
Woodlands 
208 – 5760 Teredo Street 
Sechelt, BC  V0N 3A0 
604-740-8220