Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Advertising Agencies / Nahl Group

Nahl Group

nah · LSE Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker nah
Exchange LSE
Sector Communication Services
Industry Advertising Agencies
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2020 Annual Report · Nahl Group
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Strategic
Resilient
Sustainable
2020

Annual
Report
2020

Contents

01  At a glance 

03  Managing through a pandemic

04  Strategic Report

05  Our Business
06  NAHL Group plc
07  Consumer Legal Services
10  Critical Care
13  Key Performance Indicators
17  Our Culture, Our Business
23  Chair’s Review
27  Operating Review

41  Strategic Priorities

45  Principal Risks and Uncertainties
52 

 Section 172 Statement and Stakeholder 
Engagement

55  Leadership and Governance
56  Board of Directors
58  Executive Management Team
59  Chair’s Introduction to Governance
60  Governance Statement
64  Audit and Risk Committee Report
68  Remuneration Committee Report
75  Directors’ Remuneration Policy
80  Directors’ Report

85  Financial Statements 2020

At a  
glance 

NAHL Group plc is a leader in the consumer legal services and 
catastrophic injury markets, delivering products and services 
to consumers and businesses through two autonomously 
managed divisions, Consumer Legal Services and Critical Care.

Government in 2015, meant this model could not 
be sustained as demand from the panel would fall. 
This is what happened. 

The reforms are finally going to be implemented on 
31 May 2021 and are expected to remove £1.3bn of 
value from low value RTA claims as compensation 
tariffs are significantly reduced and claims worth 
£5,000 or less are settled through the small claims 
track with no awards for costs.

To prepare for these changes we have 
transformed our Personal Injury business 
from a claims management company (CMC) 
into a modern, technologically-enabled law 
firm, National Accident Law, regulated by 
the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. National 
Accident Law can process its own work thus 
retaining 100% of the profit and cash from it, 
or it can sell that work to a panel law firm. 

2020 presented a unique set of challenges for our 
businesses. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic 
on the Group was severe as the lockdown measures 
resulted in 27% fewer consumers having accidents 
in the year. This impacted revenues in both our 
Personal Injury and Critical Care businesses. 

This was a significant setback in our plans, but we 
acted quickly to protect our staff and customers 
and our business models proved to be sufficiently 
resilient to weather this storm. Through focusing on 
the short term in 2020 we generated a significant 
increase in free cash flow (from an outflow of £1.7m 
in 2019 to an inflow of £6.1m in 2020), reduced net 
debt and de-risked the balance sheet.

Our Critical Care business, Bush & Co, holds 
a leading position in the catastrophic injury 
market. It is a long-cycle business and so 
the impact of fewer accidents resulting from 
COVID-19, and the delay in non-urgent medical 
procedures, is expected to suppress profits 
over several years. However, we do expect to 
see profit improvement in 2021 compared to 
2020 and the management team has advanced 
initiatives that could, if successful, accelerate a 
return to levels of pre-COVID profits by 2023. 

Within Consumer Legal Services, our Personal 
Injury business had historically been a simple, 
short cycle business, providing marketing and 
claim triage services to a panel of law firms for 
cash. The regulatory changes to lower value road 
traffic accident (RTA) claims, proposed by the 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

1

This is a different business model but one that is 
sustainable in the new environment, where many 
CMCs and law firms are expected to exit the 
market as they cannot make sufficient money from 
low value RTA work which they have been reliant 
on. This may further affect demand from our panel, 
although we believe those firms will continue to 
want non-RTA work that is largely unaffected by 
the reforms. 

Whilst a significant minority of our work is low value 
RTA, most of it is non-RTA work. By processing an 
increasing amount of non-RTA work, as well as all 
the RTA work, through National Accident Law from 
2021 we should have a sustainable and profitable 
business, but with a longer profit and cash cycle. 
The challenge will be scaling National Accident Law 
to deal with an increasing volume of work, including 
more complex cases, and balancing the amount of 
work we place with the panel for in-year profit and 
cash with the amount we process ourselves for 
greater, but deferred, profit and cash. 

We cannot be certain about the longer-term impact 
of the reforms on the Personal Injury market, but 
it seems likely that it will lead to consolidation and 
result in a small number of large Personal Injury 
firms dominating the market. We remain confident 

that we can successfully deal with these 

challenges and optimistic that in the future we 

can be one such firm. 

Overall, we were pleased with the way 
that, each of our two divisions coped with 
the challenges faced from COVID-19 in 
2020 and generated £6m of free cash 
enabling us to de-risk the balance sheet. 
Assuming the ongoing success of the UK 
vaccination programme and the relaxation 
of lockdown measures proceed according to 
the Government’s plan, we expect to continue 

to generate cash in 2021 along with more profit 

than in 2020. 

Managing  
through a  
pandemic

1

 Reaction
Month 0–1

3

Return
Month 6–18

Addressed immediate challenges 
to our people, customers, business 
partners and liquidity 
   Followed Government instructions and ensured 
staff were safeguarded 

   Implemented business continuity plans, which 
enabled remote working and uninterrupted 
trading from Day 1 

   Implemented immediate cost containment 
measures, including temporary voluntary pay 
reductions for the Board and senior management 
and cancelled planned pay increases

2

Resilience
Month 1–6

Addressed near-term cash 
management, liquidity and resilience 
challenges through lockdown 
   Stress tested cash flows

   Agreed new banking covenants and extended 
revolving credit facility with bank 

   Prioritised placement of personal injury enquiries 
into panel to drive cash flow

   Restructured to create our Consumer Legal 
Services division 

    Identified over £1m annualised cost savings and 
closed London office 

   Made use of Government Coronarvirus Job 
Retention Scheme, claiming £0.4m from April to 
December and furloughing up to a maximum of 
82 staff during this period

Created a plan to return the business 
to growth, scaling quickly as lockdown 
eased and the longer-term impact 
became clearer
   Developed a flexible working proposition for staff 
with suitable office space to facilitate hot-desking 
and collaboration

   Conducted a review of divisional strategies and 
prioritisation of strategic projects in light of 
market conditions

   Progressed with planned investment in 
technology in Consumer Legal Services and 
Critical Care to support future growth from 2020 
and create further operational efficiencies 

    Continued to flex our personal injury enquiry 
placement model as volume recovered, retaining 
flexibility to respond to future COVID-19 
challenges and growing levels of self-processing 
in National Accident Law 

maximum of 

82staff placed on furlough  

during this period

2 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

3

Strategic  
Report

Our  
Business

4 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

 NAHL  
Group  
plc

NAHL Group plc operates in the consumer 
legal services and catastrophic injury 
markets, delivering products and services 
to consumers and businesses through two 
independently managed divisions – Consumer 
Legal Services and Critical Care – supported 
by a centralised Shared Services function. 

Our two business models share common features: 

   the operation of leading brands in our sectors;

  highly effective and efficient marketing activity;

   deep and long-standing relationships with 
customers and partners, and ongoing business 
development;

    leveraging the use of technology to improve 
customer experience and increase efficiency;

    underpinned by our people – a committed, agile, 
proactive and highly engaged workforce, united in 
our values; 

   strong, experienced and collaborative leadership 
teams; and

   predictable and highly visible cash-flows, 
supported by a mix of near- and long-term cash 
realisation opportunities.

The Group aims to create value for its shareholders 
by delivering growth within its two divisions. Despite 
the challenges presented by COVID-19 in the year, 
the Board has maintained a sharp focus on its 
long-term goals and made progress in developing 
its strategies to grow these businesses, which are 
explained in more detail on the following pages. 

Strong

 leadership

NAHL suffered a 
significant setback as a 
result of the COVID-19 
pandemic, as the volume 
of new non-fault accidents 
fell causing a reduction in 
our revenues and profits. 
But, throughout this period 
our businesses performed 
with resilience and were 
cash generative. Each has 
an attractive investment 
proposition in their own 
right and are well placed 
to recover as lockdown 
measures ease.

James Saralis,  
Chief Financial Officer

Consumer  
Legal  
Services

Our market
The Consumer Legal Services division focuses on 
the Personal Injury and Residential Conveyancing1 
sectors of the legal services market. 

The market for Personal Injury legal services 
is estimated at £4bn, with more than 800,000 
individual claims registered in a typical year. 
Within that market, we calculate that the share 
represented by the fees earned by claimant-side 
law firms comprises £1.6bn of the total. While 
claim volumes have been in gradual decline over 
the past five years, an increase in the value of 
damages awarded, costs inflation and changes in 
the type of claims made have largely offset any 
reduction in the value of the market. The market 
for legal services in the Residential Property sector 
is estimated at £2.4bn, with more than 1 million 
property transactions taking place each year 
despite subdued activity levels in the market since 
the 2015 changes to Stamp Duty and the 2016 
Brexit vote. 

Demand for the services offered by the Personal 
Injury business ultimately stems from people who 
suffer injury in an accident that was not their fault. 
Consumers have the right to claim compensation 
for the pain and loss of earnings associated with 
such injuries, and seek legal representation to 
ensure the best outcome from such a claim. 

Our Consumer Legal 
Services division is 
a leading provider of 
legal services to the UK 
consumer with over 25 
years’ experience in the 
personal injury sector.

Simon Trott,  
Chief Operating Officer

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a reduction in 
personal injury claim volumes in 2020: social 
restrictions and multiple lockdowns impacted 
mobility from early spring, and with fewer people 
attending workplaces, visiting hospitality, retail or 
entertainment venues, and lower public transport 
use, the number of accidents and subsequent 
claims reduced significantly. Data secured by the 
Association of Consumer Services Organisations 
(ACSO) indicates that claim volumes fell by nearly 
27% in 20202. We believe that the reduction 
in non-RTA claims, which are the focus of our 
business, is a temporary feature of the market 
that will reverse once lockdown measures are 
relaxed. The number of RTA claims are likely to 
be adversely affected by the industry reforms 
due to be implemented on 31 May 2021 because 
the lower levels of compensation available in low 
value whiplash claims will reduce the propensity 
for victims of this type of accident to make a claim. 
We are forecasting a 10% reduction in volume due 
to this. However, we expect this will result in some 
competitors exiting this segment of the market, 
providing an opportunity for firms such as National 
Accident Law to increase market share. We are 
forecasting a <1% increase in market share for 
National Accident Law to offset the reduction in 
market volumes. 

6 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

7

1 The division operates a residential conveyancing business, branded as Homeward Legal, which follows a similar business model to personal injury 
by placing conveyancing instructions into a panel of third-party firms for processing. This business also provides consumers and third-party firms 
with property searches through Searches UK. 

2 Source: claims registered with the Claims Recovery Unit 

We monetise qualified enquiries through our 
flexible placement model. Enquiries either proceed 
directly to our in-house processing law firm, 
National Accident Law, or are dealt with by one 
of the specialists on our panel of law firms. We no 
longer place large volumes with our joint venture1 
firms now that we have our own in-house firm, as 
National Accident Law offers us a better return and 
a simpler journey for the customer. 

In general, enquiries processed through National 
Accident Law generate the highest return on 
investment, whilst enquiries passed to the panel 
have the benefit of providing immediate cash flow.

National Accident Law represents consumers 
under a ‘No Win, No Fee’ agreement, using our 
customised technology platform to progress 
claims to settlement efficiently and effectively. 
We recognise revenue at the point at which 
liability is admitted by the defendant and 
receive payment of our fees at the point of 
settlement. We have, therefore, high visibility 
of future cash flows which, in turn, helps to 
inform ongoing placement decisions.

National Accident Law will process all our RTA 
claims, including RTA small claims which will have 
lower margins after the small claim reforms are 
implemented by the Government, from 31 May 
2021, and an increasing number of non-RTA claims 
from the second half of 2021. 

We constantly assess market conditions, financial 
performance and our own processing capacity to 
guide our decisions on placement, investments into 
brand-building and marketing activities, and further 
investment in our claim processing capabilities. 
This flexibility allows us to respond with agility to 
market conditions and opportunities.

Our investment case and 
business model
The Group’s personal injury business model is built 
on three pillars:

1

2

3

a highly productive marketing engine, 
powered by the sector’s most  
trusted brand, National 
Accident Helpline; 

an efficient, technology-enabled 
and purpose-built law firm, National 
Accident Law, which is focused on the 
consumer; and

an agile and scalable placement 
model designed to balance the work 
we place with our panel for in-year 
profit and cash with the work we 
process ourselves for greater, but 
deferred, profit and cash. 

The combined strengths of these pillars uniquely 
position Consumer Legal Services to profitably 
service high-volume segments of its market, whilst 
enabling the division to optimise its returns from 
higher-value segments of the claims market. 

The division completed its three-year investment 
programme in 2020, which laid the foundations for 
the growth of our own law firm, National Accident 
Law, and prepared the business for the market 
reforms being implemented in May 2021. Over the 
last year, this work has included: transitioning the 
business from a claims management company to 
a law firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulatory 
Authority; upgrading its call centre technology and 
implementing a ‘One-Call’ process that provides 
a seamless customer journey and improved lead 
conversion; and introducing a new digital tool 
to enable standard RTA claims to be completed 
entirely online. 

The strong market awareness of our 
National Accident Helpline brand and its 
highly optimised website generates a high 
volume of leads which we triage through our 
customer contact centre to identify enquiries 
with the greatest potential of success. Our 
investments in digital customer journeys means 
that an increasing number of enquiries are 
generated entirely online at a reduced cost. 

Our flexible business model 
supports high returns by 
processing claims ourselves 
and also allows for options 
to maximise cash flows 
through partnership 
with specialist firms.

3

Short-
Term  
Profit and 
Cash 

Long-Term 
Profit and 
Cash

We have a predictable, cash 
generative model, with a mix 
of historical and near-term 
contracts providing ongoing 
cash flow.

5

t
n
e
m
e

m

Cash fro
P a nel plac

C

l

a

i

C

m

a

s

h

S

e

t

f

r

o

t
l

e

m

m

e

n

t

Lead to 
enquiry

e

g

Tria

P

l
a

c

e

m

e

Cost
and 
mix of
leads

G

e

L

n

e

e

a

r

d

a

t
i
o

n

Category-Leading
Branded Marketing
Engine

d v ertisin g

d   A

n

a

B r

Brand 
health

n

t i

n

t

o

N

a

ti

o

n

a

l 

A

c

c
i
d

e

n

t L
a

w

Revenue
per win

Highly Efficient
In-House Legal
Processing

Enquiry
to claim

S

e

C

la
i

ttle

m

(

F

m

e

e

e

s

)

n

t

Claim 
win rate

g

Claim
Processin

Our deep consumer 
understanding and highly 
developed marketing 
engine helps us generate 
sector-leading numbers 
of leads across a wide 
range of injury types.

2

1

Having invested over 
£50m since inception, 
National Accident Helpline 
is the sector’s most 
trusted brand with high 
consumer awareness.

4

Our technology-
enabled, digital solution 

is based around highly 
customised software and 
bespoke processes designed 
to deliver high efficiency.

1. References to ‘joint venture’ law firm relate to our law firms Your Law LLP and Law Together LLP which we operate in partnership with a minority 
member. The term ‘joint venture’ does not relate to the IFRS definition. These law firms are accounted for as subsidiary undertakings, see note 1 to 
the financial statements for further details. 

8 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

9

 
 
 
Critical  
Care

Bush & Co is a leading 
player in the £107m 
Catastrophic Injury market 
and has been providing 
case management and 
expert witness services 
to solicitors and insurers 
across the UK for 35 years.

Helen Jackson, 
Managing Director, Bush & Co 

Our market
Our Critical Care business, Bush & Co (Bush), 
holds a leading position providing legal support 
services in the Catastrophic Injury market, 
itself a subset of the Medical Reporting & 
Rehabilitation market. The Catastrophic Injury 
market is defined as those cases involving the 
most severe and life-changing injuries, with 
settlement values of £500,000 and above. 

We calculate that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 
our target market was worth £107m, with around 
6,500 catastrophic personal injury claims made 
in a typical year. Whilst not all of these claims 
are subject to the full suite of services provided 
by the sector, most require the services of an 
Expert Witness and around half will use a Case 
Management service as part of their rehabilitation. 
The market had grown steadily over the previous 
five years, with a compound annual growth rate of 
2%. Case numbers had remained broadly flat, with 
a slight decline in the number of serious road traffic 
accidents offset by modest growth in medical 
negligence and workplace injuries. 

COVID-19 saw the number of serious accidents 
contract due to a reduction in vehicles on the 
road, people in work and a delay in non-urgent 
medical procedures. We believe this reduction to be 

temporary and forecast that the number of serious 
accidents will return to pre-COVID trends once the 
Government’s lockdown measures end.

The complexity of catastrophic injuries results in 
long case lifecycles, which makes the market more 
resilient and predictable. Within Case Management, 
instructions for Initial Needs Assessments are 
typically made 3–4 months after an injury. Ongoing 
case management support for rehabilitation has 
an average lifecycle of over two years, meaning 
that in any given year more than half of the cases 
under management relate to accidents suffered 
in previous years. Expert Witness instructions are 
typically received once a case is well under way, 
which is often more than three years from the dates 
of the accident. 

We believe that the 27% fall in the number of 
personal injury claims overall will translate to a 
similar reduction in catastrophic injury claims in 
2020. Therefore, whilst the pandemic naturally led 
to a reduction in Case Management instructions 
in-year with a recovery following several months 
after accident volumes return, the impact and 
corresponding recovery in Expert Witness 
instructions will be less pronounced and spread 
over multiple years. The business has factored 
these market features into its long-term planning.

Our investment case and 
business model
Bush’s business model is built on three pillars: 

1

2

3

  strong and diverse customer 
relationships with over 400 clients 
across the legal, insurance, clinical 
and charity sectors;

a wide range of competencies 
and specialisms creating revenue 
realisation opportunities throughout 
the multi-year rehabilitation process; 

 focused investment in technological 
innovation and expansion into 
adjacent segments of the market, 
steered by our Innovate – Optimise – 
Grow strategic framework

Consequently, Bush delivers robust 

and predictable financial performance with a mix of 
new and recurring revenues providing high visibility 
on cash flow over the multi-year life of a case.

Bush provides vital services to support individuals 
who have suffered severe and life-changing 
injuries whilst they pursue a compensation claim. 
Typically appointed early in the case lifecycle by 
a claimant’s representative (e.g. a law firm, or 
insurer), we manage catastrophic injury cases 
for claimants from injury to rehabilitation with an 
average lifecycle of 26 months through our network 
of Case Manager and Expert Witness Associates, 
who are exclusive to Bush in this sector. We are 
also engaged later in a case lifecycle (an average 
of 36 months post-injury) by lawyers on either 
the claimant or defendant side to provide expert 
assessments and reports used by the court to 
determine both liability and claim size. Through 
the deep and long-term relationships that we have 
built with our clients we command a prominent and 
market-leading position in case management and 
have grown to become one of three leading players 
in the expert witness sector. 

Through the combination of our core competencies 
in case management and expert witness, and 
the coverage this affords of the case lifecycle, 
our business model provides a mix of immediate 
and recurring revenue which in turn provides 
predictable, highly visible cash flows. Investments 
in marketing, technology and capability through 
the Innovate – Optimise – Grow framework have 
given the business a track record of strong top 
line growth, consistent market share gains, and 
operating margin expansion. 

We have also identified significant growth 
opportunities in expert witness and are seeking to 
develop our capabilities in key specialisms.

400clients across the legal,         insurance, clinical  

and charity sectors

10 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

11

The Innovate – Optimise –  
Grow Strategic Framework

Building long term 
customer relationships 
through business 
development

New case management
defendant brand for the
insurance marketplace

Continue to maintain
and grow our brand:
Quality Service and Expertise
delivered to Clients

Grow

Expand Case 
Management into high-value 
Multi-Track claims

Optimise

Innovate

Expand adjacent
legal markets, leveraging
proprietry technology to
increase efficiency

State-of-the-art report
writing tool for Expert
Witness service

Improvements to core
processes to drive
operational efficiencies

Targeted recruitment
of experts to expand
capacity and
develop services

12 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Key  
Performance  
Indicators

Key  
Performance  
Indicators

The Board monitors a number of Key Performance Indicators 
(KPIs) to assess the Group’s performance against its strategic 
objectives. These KPIs include alternative performance measures 
where they provide additional insight into performance from the 
perspective of shareholders and other stakeholders.

In addition to the Group’s financial KPIs, the Board 
has identified several non-financial KPIs that help it 
track progress in areas that are critical for the long-
term success of the Group. These are not directly 
reflected in the Group’s financial statements but 
are assessed on a regular basis and managed by 
divisional management.

1 Cash generation –  
free cash flow
Free cash flow comprises the cash that the Group 
has generated from operations less amounts 
invested in capital items, lease payments and 
payments to and from non-controlling interests. 
The lockdown measures associated with the 
COVID-19 pandemic caused fewer consumers to 
have accidents in 2020, which resulted in fewer 
enquiries being generated in our Personal Injury 
business (KPI 3). To increase our liquidity, we 
responded by flexing our placement model to place 
fewer enquiries than planned into National Accident 
Law and maximise enquiries placed in the panel, 
thereby driving increased in-year cash flow. The 
Group also benefitted from growth in settlements 
relating to historical claims. These decisions 
contributed to the Group generating £6.1m of free 
cash flow but result in lower profits and cash flow in 
National Accident Law in future years. (Please see 
Operating Review on Page 28 for more details and 
note 2 for a reconciliation of this figure to statutory 
measures).

  Free cash flow in the year (£’000)

2020 

2019 

(1,702)

2018 

2,900

6,068

2 Profitability – underlying 
earnings per share 
(underlying EPS)
Underlying EPS excludes exceptional items 
to derive a profit metric on a per share basis 
that reflects the underlying performance of the 
business. Underlying EPS has decreased in 2020 
due to the impact of COVID-19 on enquiry volumes 
in Consumer Legal Services and instruction levels 
in Critical Care. (Please see Operating Review 
on page 28 for more details and note 2 for a 
reconciliation of this figure to statutory measures.)

  Underlying EPS in the year (p)

2020  1.9

2019 

2018 

9.4

15.1

Underlying EPS for 2019 and 2018 has been 
restated to take into account the changes in 
presentation of non-underlying items. See note 30 
for further details. 

   Personal injury enquiries generated in the year 
(No.)

2020 

2019 

2018 

36,214

56,256

65,468

3 Marketing services – 
personal injury enquiries 
generated
Our ability to generate personal injury enquiries 
and balance these against market demand and 
available working capital, are a core element of our 
business model and a leading indicator of revenue. 
The lockdown measures resulted in fewer accidents 
which, in turn, resulted in a significant decline in 
enquiry volumes generated through the National 
Accident Helpline brand. (Please see Operating 
Review on page 28 for more details).

4 Personal injury enquiry 
placement – percentage 
of enquiries placed in each 
processing channel
The decisions taken on where we choose to place 
the personal injury enquiries that we generate 
will influence both the levels of profit and cash 
flow in the current year, as well as in future years. 
This is because an enquiry processed by National 
Accident Law generates higher levels of profit 
compared to those processed by our joint-venture 
law firms or the panel; but placement into either 
National Accident Law or the joint-venture law 
firms requires us to wait until case settlement 
for the cash derived from a successful claim. 
Also, the volume of new claims placed in National 
Accident Law is limited by levels of operational 
capacity and available working capital. 

Monthly placement levels are planned in our annual 
budgetary process but can be flexed throughout 
the year depending on the volume of enquiries 
generated, the levels of capital available to allocate 
to self-processing, panel demand and operational 
capacity in National Accident Law. 

In 2020, in response to the impact of the COVID-19 
pandemic on the business, the Board made the 
decision to flex its placement plans and allocate a 
higher proportion of enquiries to the panel in order 
to generate increased free cash flow in the year 
(KPI 1). As a result, the proportion of enquiries 
placed into the joint-venture law firms was reduced 
as well as a modest reduction in enquiries placed 
in National Accident Law compared to the start of 
the year. Consequently, the Group ended the year 
with a lower number of ongoing claims in its joint-
venture law firms and in National Accident Law than 
originally planned (KPI 5), to develop into profit and 
cash flow in future years. 

  Panel and other

  Joint venture law firms

  National Accident Law

2020 

2019 

2018 

69.0%  

21.0% 10.0%

66.6%  

29.1%

4.3%

73.1%  

26.9%

0.0%

14 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

15

5 Service provision – 
ongoing claims / open 
case management cases
Our ability to generate revenue on processing 
personal injury claims is dependent on successfully 
settling claims. Our ongoing claims represent 
a store of value that will convert to revenue 
and cash in future years as the claims progress 
through the legal process and, ultimately, 
settle. This year, we have rebased this KPI to 
reflect only ongoing claims in National Accident 
Law, as our strategy is to focus on these 
claims where we retain 100% of the profits. 

In Critical Care, we invoice on a monthly basis 
for ongoing case management support provided 
to clients. This year, the number of open case 
management cases has not grown as much as 
we would have anticipated, due to the impact of 
COVID-19. This caused a decline in the number 
of new cases, while the number of existing cases 
coming to the end of their lifecycle continued 
unaffected. (Please see Operating Review on page 
28 for more details).

  Ongoing claims in NAL 31 December (No.)

  Ongoing case management cases at 31 December (No.)

2020 

2019 

2018 

2020 

2019 

2018 

–

1,641

1,208

1,294

1,110

2,975

6 Expert reports – critical 
care reports issued 
We charge fees for issuing expert witness reports 
and initial needs assessments in Critical Care. We 
have issued fewer reports this year due to less 
demand from our law firm customers as a result of 
productivity challenges caused by the COVID-19 
pandemic and also because of patient access 
challenges arising from the lockdown measures. 

  Reports issued in the year (No.)

2020 

2019 

2018 

1,148

1,325

1,292

16 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Our culture, 
our business

Our  
culture, 
our business

2020 presented a unique set of challenges for our business.

The national lockdowns resulted in 27% fewer 
consumers having accidents in the year, reducing 
demand for our services, and the ‘Stay at home’ 
order issued by the Government in March 2020 
required a significant adjustment to our ways of 
working. Our overriding priority was the continued 
health, safety and wellbeing of our people and 
supporting our customers and business partners 
through those unprecedented times. 

Initially we focused on the short-term challenges, 
including transitioning over 250 staff members 
from a predominantly office-based environment to 
working from home. We swiftly implemented our 
business continuity plans and our well supported 
systems enabled staff to work remotely with 
full support, ensuring uninterrupted service and 
support to our customers.

Due to the reduced demand, and in order 
to manage our costs, we chose to furlough 
82 members of staff throughout the year 
and utilised the Government’s Coronavirus 
Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) on a flexible 
basis. This action protected jobs and helped 
us to prepare for a recovery in the business 
once COVID-19 levels permitted.

Members of the Board and leadership team 
voluntarily took temporary salary cuts and the 
Group cancelled its annual salary review. We also 
permanently closed our London office and merged 
our Personal Injury and Residential Property 
businesses to create a new division, Consumer 
Legal Services. 

Throughout all of these changes, our people 
demonstrated great resilience, drive and positivity. 
Their actions, underpinned by our strong company 
culture and Values, have proved to be a significant 
asset of the Group. 

 Our Values

The adaptability of our staff is testament to 
our policy of recruiting, appraising, rewarding 
and recognising against our company Values; 
resulting in a committed and flexible team that 
consistently performs to the highest standards.

This is exemplified through our company 
Values, by staff who are:

Passionate
about the business and their role in it;

Driven 
to maintain operational performance;

Unified 
to do the best job possible; and 

?

Curious 
about how efficiency and efficacy can deliver 
excellent performance

Strong, decisive leadership 
and clear communications
Strong leadership was more important than ever 
in the first quarter of 2020, when scale of the 
COVID-19 pandemic became clear. In March, our 
leaders created 4 principles to help guide their 
decision making:

the safeguarding of the health and 
security of our people is paramount

the need to be able to support our 
people by ensuring we continue 
to have a strong and sustainable 
business

our commitment to following 
Government/Public Health England 
(PHE) advice, while seeking to 
minimise any negative impact on our 
business or people

our commitment to transparency and 
openness throughout any period of 
disruption 

1

2

3

4

Transparent and open communications were 
a theme throughout the year and our leaders 
sought to replicate the presence they had enjoyed 
when office-based by utilising numerous online 
communication tools. This included two new 
regular activities, each designed to improve staff 
engagement and as a means to deliver important 
messages. First, our monthly Biscuit Briefings were 
held online, where all staff received updates on the 
business from our leadership team and engaged 
in Q&A sessions. Secondly, our Weekly Welcomes 
were a Monday morning introduction to the week, 
delivered by a member of the wider management 
teams, providing detailed information on business 
activities, advice and a challenge to inspire and 
encourage our staff. 

This is the best culture  
I’ve worked in. 

18 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

19

 
 
Keeping furloughed 
colleagues engaged
For our colleagues on the CJRS, it was vital that 
they continued to feel engaged with the Group 
whilst furloughed. They were invited to attend the 
Biscuit Briefings on an optional basis and received 
a twice weekly Furlough News e-newsletter. We 
also provided an opportunity for them to tell 
their own stories through The Furlough Files – a 
series of vlog episodes. These activities, alongside 
regular contact from their managers ensured their 
seamless reintegration into the business when 
demand returned to our markets.

Staff wellbeing
As reflected in our first principle for operation, the 
wellbeing of our colleagues is paramount and staff 
were encouraged to share their status through 
weekly check-in meetings with their managers 
and colleagues. Regular reminders of the support 
available from the Group, including access to an 
Employee Assistance Programme, Mental Health 
First Aiders and Wellness Action Plans were 
delivered via a number of vlogs signposting staff to 
any support they might need.

Online yoga and wellbeing sessions were 
also introduced to support our staff’s 
physical and mental wellbeing while 
ensuring that they had regular opportunities 
to take breaks away from work. 

Seeing how our 
company has coped 
with COVID-19 has 
demonstrated that we 
are a business with a 
great culture of trust 
and care.

Bush & Co supported 
their staff’s immediate 
transition from office-
based to remote working 
by keeping colleagues in 
contact with each other 
through its Postcards 
From Home activity 
– staff would submit 
photographs and updates 
about their remote 
working experience and 
these were shared across 
the business.

e

m

o

H

m

o

r

f

s

d

r

a

c

t

s

o

P

0

2

0

2

n

o

i

t

i

d

E

e

v

i

t

s

e

F

POSTCARDS FROM

Home

POSTCARDS FROM

Home

S

D

R

A

C

T

S

O

P

O M

R

F

H o m e

20 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

21

 
 
 
 
 
Our resilient and engaged 
workforce
As a group of businesses, we strive to 
maintain an engaged workforce, underpinned 
by a strong culture. This makes us resilient, 
capable of adapting to change and more 
likely to achieve our corporate objectives. 

Despite the challenges of 2020, we were very 
pleased with the results of our annual staff survey, 
which showed that engagement levels remained 
high at 77.2%1 for the year against a UK Gallup 
average of 17%. This is the third consecutive year 
we have scored over 75%, putting our people 
amongst the most engaged in the UK. 

I think the way that the 
Group has handled the 
pandemic and the way 
employees have been 
treated throughout 
this difficult time is 
really excellent and 
won’t be forgotten.

Training and development
We regularly surveyed our staff throughout the 
year and identified that many were not used to 
remote work or managing remote teams and some 
found this change challenging. In response, we 
developed two training courses to support staff – 
one focused on mental health and wellbeing and 
the second, which we called Pokerface, to help 
colleagues become more effective at working 
remotely. It became clear over the ensuing months 
that these courses had a significant impact on team 
performance and wellbeing.

Recognition from 
Investors in People
During the year the Group received recognition 
for the leadership, support and development 
of its people from Investors in People. We were 
extremely proud that our Residential Property 
business maintained its Silver status in the year 
and our Critical Care business, Bush & Co, was 
rewarded for its consistent improvement with Gold 
status. This is in addition to the Gold status for our 
Personal Injury business, awarded in 2018. 

We were extremely proud to be awarded these 
accolades that demonstrate we are an employer of 
choice, and they are testament to the expertise and 
dedication of our people. 

We’ve gone through 
tough times recently 
with COVID-19, but the 
company has really 
shown that it truly lives its 
values. Communication 
has been transparent, 
frequent and honest.

1. NAHL Group plc OwnIt! staff engagement survey results, June 2020.

22 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Chair’s  
Review

 Chair’s
 Review

£4.7mreduction in net debt

This is my first report as Chair of the Board of NAHL Group plc, 
having served as Non-Executive Director since 2016.

2020 was a year dominated by the challenges 
presented by the COVID-19 global pandemic. Our 
businesses faced lower demand in their markets 
and had to quickly adapt their operations to 
protect staff and customers. However, by flexing 
our personal injury business model, carefully 
managing costs and with a resilient performance 
by our Critical Care division, the Group remained 
profitable at the underlying operating profit level 
in the year and was able to reduce its net debt by 
nearly £5m. 

2020 results
Group revenues decreased to £40.9m (2019: 
£51.3m) in the year, largely due to reduced volumes 
in our Personal Injury and Critical Care businesses. 
Underlying operating profit declined to £5.7m 
(2019: £10.4m). This reflects the reduction in 
revenues but was partially mitigated by a reduction 
in underlying costs of £5.7m from £40.9m to 
£35.2m, including the in-year benefit of annualised 
cost savings of £1.2m which were generated by 
restructuring the Group in the first half of 2020.

The loss before tax decreased to £0.2m (2019: 
£2.3m), largely as a result of the absence of last 
year’s one-off impairment charge recognised in 
respect of our Residential Property business. This 
has not been repeated and a review of our goodwill 
and intangible balances this year supports their 
carrying value.

Underlying earnings per share decreased to 
1.9p (2019: 9.4p) and basic earnings per share 
increased to (0.5)p (2019: (6.4)p). 

The Group delivered significantly improved levels 
of cash generation in the year, in line with its near-
term strategic focus of reducing net debt, which 
stood at £16.3m on 31 December 2020, down from 
£21.0m the year before.

Strategic development
Despite the challenges presented by COVID-19 
in the year, and the extensive due diligence 
process undertaken as a result of the aborted 
takeover bid in Q4 (see further details below), 
the Board has remained focused on its 
long-term goals and made good progress in 
developing its strategies for the Consumer 
Legal Services and Critical Care divisions. 

Consumer Legal Services
In Consumer Legal Services, we aim to be the UK’s 
leading technologically-enabled law firm, focusing 
on high-volume personal injury claims. We have 
made excellent progress with our personal injury 
transformation, following the successful launch of 
National Accident Law in April 2019. 

During the year, we successfully transitioned 
from being a claims management company 
into a modern, technologically-enabled 

law firm, with a market leading brand 
that can process its own enquiries. This 
transformation is essential to our future.

By the end of 2020 we had reduced the number 
of claims being sent to our joint ventures, as we 
can now make higher (although deferred) profits 
processing claims in National Accident Law. 
Alternatively, we can generate cash quicker by 
sending claims to the panel. 

The long-awaited regulatory reforms are due 
to be implemented on 31 May 2021. This will 
significantly reduce the processing and sales 
value of most RTA claims, and is a key reason 
why we have developed our wholly-owned law 
firm National Accident Law. Fortunately, the 
majority of our enquires are non-RTA, which will 
be largely unaffected by the reforms, but the 
changes will significantly impact the revenue 
and profit we make from RTA enquiries. 

The Group has worked extremely hard over several 
years to ensure we are ready to embrace these 
changes and deliver value post the reforms by 
continuing to increase the proportion and number of 
claims being processed through National Accident 
Law. This should increase the average profit per 
claim made by us, on a blended basis, across our 
entire book. Our strategy, therefore, is to:

1.  process all RTA claims in National Accident Law, 
including all RTA small claims. Since January 
2021, over 80% of new RTA claims have been 
placed into National Accident Law and that 
proportion will increase to 100% before 31 May. 

2.  process an increasing volume of non-RTA claims 
in National Accident Law, generating a higher 
return from these claims. To date only a small 
number of non-RTA claims are being allocated 
to National Accident Law but from the second 
half of 2021 these numbers will grow ensuring 
that all the profit from them is retained in the 
business, rather than being shared. Panel firms 
will continue to receive a substantial number 
of non-RTA claims as these generate cash and 
profit in-year, whereas these are deferred when 
claims are sent to National Accident Law.

3.  leverage investments in operations, people 
and technology to improve both efficiency 
and customer experience for all claim types. 

To this end, key upgrades to the call centre 
technology, digital journey and customer triage 
processes were successfully implemented in 
December 2020. These improvements should 
increase conversion metrics and also facilitate 
the efficient processing of RTA small claims by 
National Accident Law after 31 May.

Critical Care
In Critical Care, Bush & Co are a leading player in 
the catastrophic injury market, defined by personal 
injury claims of over £500,000 in value and with 
clients requiring extensive care. Bush provides vital 
services to support individuals who have suffered 
severe and life-changing injuries whilst they pursue 
a compensation claim. It does this through its three 
strategic pillars:

1.  strong and diverse customer relationships with 
over 400 clients across the legal, insurance, 
clinical and charity sectors;

2.  a wide range of competencies and specialisms 

across our case management and expert 
witness businesses, creating revenue realisation 
opportunities throughout the multi-year 
rehabilitation process; 

3.  underpinned by our Innovate – Optimise – Grow 
strategic framework, focusing on technological 
innovation and expansion into adjacent markets.

Good progress has been made over the last year 
in developing the strategy for growth in Critical 
Care. Our strategic choices follow our Innovate 
– Optimise – Grow model, bringing innovative 
services to market; optimising our operations; and 
growing our footprint by expanding into adjacent 
sectors and building market share.

Over the last year, we have made improvements 
to our base technology platform, with further 
enhancements planned for 2021 and 2022 to drive 
efficiencies in our case management processes. We 
also made excellent progress in the development of 
a proprietary digital medico-legal report writing tool 
for Expert Witness. This will enable us to improve 
the efficiency of our report writing and allow our 
existing consultants to process more reports each 
month. This is currently being trialled and we plan a 
wider roll out later this year.

24 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

25

We are expanding our very successful case 
management business within its current market 
through a differentiated proposition, designed 
to expand our share with insurers and defendant 
customers. This proposition should also provide a 
launch-pad into the lower value, but higher volume 
segment of the market, for claims with a value of 
between £100,000 and £500,000.

We have also identified significant growth 
opportunities in Expert Witness and are seeking to 
develop our capabilities in key specialisms.

Aborted takeover bid
During the year, the Group was the target 
of a reverse takeover bid by another AIM 
company, Frenkel Topping Group plc (Frenkel 
Topping). Despite the Board engaging in 
extensive discussions aimed at concluding 
a deal that was in the best interests of our 
shareholders, Frenkel Topping eventually 
decided not to make an offer for the Group. 

Engagement with 
shareholders
The Company is committed to maintaining good 
communication with investors and since taking 
the role of Chair in October 2020, I have sought 
to engage with our major shareholders. These 
discussions have been valuable in helping me 
understand shareholders’ views and I look forward 
to further engagement throughout 2021. I would 
like to extend an invitation to all shareholders to 
our Annual General Meeting, which is being held 
on 29 June 2021. Further details will be posted 
on our website and a formal invitation sent to 
shareholders.

Governance and Board 
changes
NAHL Group plc places great importance on 
ensuring we have a strong and effective governance 
and compliance culture and framework. 

The Company saw several changes to the 
composition of the Board last year. In June 2020, 
we welcomed Brian Phillips to the Board as Non-
Executive Director. Brian has extensive experience 
which has already proven valuable to us (see page 
57). In September, Russell Atkinson stepped down 
as Group CEO, having made a considerable impact 
on the development of the Group over the eight 
years that he served. This included taking the 
business through the IPO, three acquisitions and 
the transformation of the personal injury business 
into a law firm. In October, Caroline Brown stepped 

down from the role of Chair. I would like to thank 
them for their contributions to the business and I 
wish Russell and Caroline well for the future. 

Since October, the Board has consisted of four 
Non-Executive Directors and one Executive 
Director, with clear separation between the roles 
of Non-Executive and Executive Directors. As 
Chair, I am responsible for the running of the 
Board and have been working closely with James 
Saralis (Group CFO), who has responsibility for 
implementing the strategy agreed by the Board and 
managing the day-to-day operations of the Group. 
He is ably supported in this role by our Executive 
Management Team (see page 58) and I consider 
this structure appropriate to the Group’s current 
circumstances, size and complexity. 

Summary 
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant 
impact on our business. I am pleased with the fast 
and effective response our divisions made to this 
dislocation whilst continuing work on their longer-
term strategies. 

Both divisions have developed a good 
understanding of their respective paths to recovery 
from the impact of COVD-19. Our Personal Injury 
business has completed its transformation into a 
law firm capable of processing its own enquiries in 
good time to deal with the challenges presented 
by the regulatory reforms. Critical Care has some 
exciting plans to develop its market share and 
improve efficiencies. The Board continues to 
work with our advisers to examine each of our 
businesses and how they can contribute to the 
Group’s long-term performance. These discussions 
have identified the potential to create near-term 
value for shareholders through the sale of our 
Residential Property business, which we will be 
progressing in the months to come. We remain 
optimistic about the future and, unless there are 
any further setbacks with COVID-19, expect to see 
profits in 2021 exceed those in 2020.

Finally, I would like to thank our people for their 
unwavering focus on supporting our customers 
during this unprecedented year, and our 
shareholders for their continued support.

Tim Aspinall 
Chair of the Board

4 June 2021

26 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Operating  
Review

CASE STUDY

Keeping clients at the 
heart of business
Within our Critical Care division, because 
of the lockdown restrictions our Case 
Management and Expert Witness associates 
were unable to make in-person consultations. 
Our teams quickly developed new working 
practices to allow our associates to provide 
consultations to our catastrophically injured 
clients online. Where clients lacked the 
required technology devices, Bush & Co 
distributed tablet computers to where they 
were most needed, providing continuity 
of care and further cementing the clients’ 
place at the centre of its business.

i.  We leveraged the flexibility in our Personal 

Injury business model to prioritise placement of 
enquiries into the panel to maximise cash flow. 

ii.  We implemented measures to reduce our costs, 
including reducing property and lease costs, 
introduced temporary voluntary pay reductions 
for the Board and senior management, and 
cancelled the planned pay increase across the 
workforce.

iii.  We restructured the Group, merging our 
Personal Injury and Residential Property 
businesses into the Consumer Legal Services 
division and created a Shared Services function. 
We identified and secured £1.2m of annualised 
savings, including the closure of our London 
office.

iv.  We made use of Government support in the 

form of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme 
(CJRS) and the deferral of VAT payments. 
At the peak of its usage in May, the Group 
furloughed 82 staff (30% of total) and by 
the end of the year this had reduced to two 
staff members. In total we expect £0.4m will 
have been claimed under the CJRS, which 
helped to keep redundancies to a minimum.

Operating  
Review

2020 was an extraordinary year, in which the business – indeed 
the whole country – had to adapt and respond to the rapidly 
evolving threat of COVID-19.

Overview
For us, COVID-19 posed a risk to our employees 
and customers, many of whom are vulnerable. The 
lockdown measures imposed by the Government 
caused a 27% reduction in consumer accidents 
in the year, which had a significant impact on 
our revenues. This had the potential to cause 
irreversible damage to our businesses.

I am pleased with our response to these threats, 
which was swift and decisive. We implemented 
our business continuity plans and transitioned 
our staff to working from home using our recently 
upgraded technology solutions. We continued to 
provide uninterrupted support for our customers 
and developed new ways of working with the 
restrictions put in place. We restructured the Group 
to cut costs and re-focusing on short-term tactics 
to increase our liquidity. We adapted our business 
models, generated over £6m in free cash flow, 
reduced net debt and de-risked the balance sheet. 

Whilst managing these challenges, the Group 
continued to make progress with its long-term 
objectives. The Consumer Legal Services division 
completed much of its transformation into a 
modern, technologically-enabled law firm and our 
Critical Care division advanced initiatives that will 
contribute to its recovery. 

Despite the challenges that we faced, we have 
continued to support our customers and in this 
period we have helped over 36,000 customers with 
new personal injury claims (2019: 56,000); issued 
1,148 expert witness reports and initial needs 
assessments (2019: 1,325); and provided over 
1,200 clients with case management to support 
their rehabilitation (2019: 1,294).

Response to COVID-19
The various lockdown measures introduced by 
the Government had a dramatic effect on our 
business. Throughout the pandemic, our priority 
has been ensuring the wellbeing of our staff and 
supporting our customers and business partners 
through these unprecedented times. To that end, in 
March, our IT and Operations teams implemented 
continuity plans which enabled colleagues to work 
safely from home and to provide remote access 
to clients. Recent investments in technology 
enhanced our ability to maintain high levels of 
service under difficult conditions.

After the initial reaction to the pandemic, 
we took a number of actions designed 
to increase our resilience and liquidity, 
summarised below and on page 3.

28 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

29

Financial performance
Review of the income statement

Consumer Legal Services 
Critical Care 

Revenue 

Consumer Legal Services 
Critical Care 
Shared Services 
Other items 

Underlying operating profit  

2020 
£m 

29.6 
11.3 

40.9 

5.4 
3.6 
(1.9) 
(1.4) 

5.7 

2019 
£m 

37.7 
13.6 

51.3 

8.8 
5.0 
(1.6) 
(1.8) 

10.4 

Change 
£m 

(8.1) 
(2.3) 

(10.4) 

(3.4) 
(1.4) 
(0.3) 
0.4 

(4.7) 

Change
%

-21.8
-16.4

-20.3

-38.5
-28.3
-17.2
+18.3

-45.7

The 2019 results have been restated to better reflect the structure of the Group as well as a revision to the presentation of the income statement 
as explained below. Total revenue and underlying operating profit are unchanged. See note 30 to the financial statements for further details.

Revenue across the Group decreased in 
the year by 20.3% from £51.3m to £40.9m, 
largely as a result of reduced demand for 
our services caused by fewer accidents. As 
a result, underlying operating profit also 
decreased, by 45.7% from £10.4m to £5.7m at 
an underlying margin of 13.8% (2019: 20.3%).

 £40.9m

revenue for the year

Changes to financial 
reporting disclosures
During the year, the Directors, in conjunction with 
the Group’s new external auditors, undertook a 
review of NAHL’s financial reporting disclosures.  
As a result of this assessment, the Directors 
have simplified the presentation of the income 
statement and amended the classification of 
certain costs along with the definition of certain 
alterative performance measures (APMs).  In 
addition, the Directors have determined that the 
presentation of the non-controlling members’ 
interests in the profits of the Group’s ABS law firms 
should be amended in the financial statements and, 
as required by IAS 8, the Group has restated the 
2019 comparatives to be consistent with this new 
presentation.  Further details are presented in note 
30 and below.

The impact of these changes on the 2019 results is 
as follows:

Impact on consolidated statement  
of comprehensive income 
Revenue 
Cost of sales 

Gross profit 

Administrative expenses 

Underlying operating profit 

Share-based payments 
Amortisation of intangible assets  
acquired on business combinations 
Exceptional items 

Operating profit 
Profit attributable to non-controlling  
interest members in LLPs 
Financial income 
Financial expense 

Profit/(loss) before tax 
Taxation 

2019 as 
previously 
reported 
£000 

51,314 
(24,990) 

26,324 

(23,761) 

12,192 

(811) 

(960) 
(7,858) 

2,563 

– 
202 
(615) 

2,150 
(635) 

Profit/(loss) and total comprehensive  
income for the year 

1,515 

Profit and total comprehensive  
income is attributable to: 
Owners of the company 
Non-controlling interests 

Impact on statement of  
financial position 
Member capital and current  
accounts (financial liability) 
Total current liabilities 
Total liabilities 

Net assets 

(2,959) 
4,474 

1,515 

– 
(17,766) 
(42,488) 

59,079 

Capital and reserves attributable  
to non-controlling interests 

3,315 

Adjustment 1 – Following the restructure of the 
Group during the year, costs relating to the Group’s 
call centre and lead triage operations have been 
reclassified from administrative expenses to cost 
of sales.  This ensures consistency between the 
Group’s Personal Injury and Residential Property 
businesses.  There is no change to the underlying 
operating profit of Consumer Legal Services as a 
result of this change.

Adjustment 1 
£000 

Adjustment 2 
£000 

Adjustment 3 
£000 

2019 as
restated
£000

51,314
(27,033)

24,281

(21,718)

10,421

–

–
(7,858)

2,563

(4,474)
202
(615)

(2,324)
(635)

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

(4,474) 
– 
– 

(4,474) 
– 

(4,474) 

(2,959)

– 
(4,474) 

(2,959)
–

(4,474) 

(2,959)

(3,315) 
(3,315) 
(3,315) 

(3,315)
(21,081)
(45,803)

(3,315) 

55,764

(3,315) 

–

– 
(2,043) 

(2,043) 

2,043 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

(1,771) 

811 

960 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

Adjustment 2 – In line with best practice, the 
Group has presented the costs of share-based 
payments and amortisation of intangible assets 
arising on business combinations within underlying 
operating profit rather than as non-underlying 
items.  The Directors consider that this change will 
result in greater comparability of the Group results 
with other listed entities.

30 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

31

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Adjustment 3 – Following a detailed review of 
the LLP agreements in respect of the Group’s 
joint-venture law firms, and in consultation 
with the Group’s new auditors, the Directors 
have determined that the non-controlling 
member capital and current accounts previously 
accounted for as equity in the consolidated 
statement of financial position, meets the 
definition of a financial liability under IAS32 
and should be presented as such.  There 
is no change to the capital and reserves 
attributable to the owners of the Company.

As a result, the profit attributable to non-controlling 
interests has now been reclassified as an expense 
in the statement of comprehensive income rather 
than shown as an allocation of profits to a non-
controlling interest.  This is in line with treatment 
of income and returns on financial liabilities under 
IAS 32.  There is no change to the profit and total 
comprehensive income attributable to the owners 
of the Company.

The Directors believe that these changes to 
presentation better reflect the nature of the costs 
and the operations of the respective businesses. 

Consumer Legal Services 
performance
In the Consumer Legal Services division, revenue 
contracted by 21.8% from £37.7m to £29.6m, 
and underlying operating profit fell by 38.5% from 
£8.8m to £5.4m. 

At the start of 2020, the division was operating as 
two distinct businesses and the Personal Injury 
business had a solid start to the year. Lead volumes 
were showing a positive trend, we were airing a new 
TV campaign and our flexible placement strategy 
was operating well and growing claim volumes in 
National Accident Law. Our Residential Property 
business also had an encouraging start to the year 
as the first two months of 2020 saw clear signs of 
growing optimism in the housing market with the 
clarity provided by the outcome of the December 
2019 General Election. We witnessed a sharp 
increase in market activity and this, combined with 
the market share wins delivered in 2019, resulted in 
strong top line growth through the first quarter.

However, as it became clear in March that the 
country was heading for the first national lockdown, 
lead volumes and consumers’ propensity to 
convert dropped dramatically. At its worst, in April, 
personal injury enquiry volumes dropped to 30% of 
2019 levels and Q2, in total, delivered 45% of 2019 
volumes. As underlying demand dropped away, 

our flexible business model allowed us to respond 
quickly, eliminating any marketing spend rendered 
inefficient by changes in consumer behaviour 
and prioritising the placement of personal injury 
enquiries into the panel to maximise cash flow. 

Although we temporarily slowed placement of 
enquiries into our law firms in 2020 to maximise 
the cash opportunity from our panel, our law firms 
continued to convert enquiries into ongoing claims 
ahead of our target of 67%. Our wholly owned law 
firm NAL and the Group’s joint venture law firms, 
Your Law and Law Together, saw a 15% increase 
in claims won in the year to 31 December 2021 
and our estimate of the unrecognised profits 
attributable to ongoing claims at 31 December 
2020 increased by 85% to £6.1m from the prior 
year (profit after deduction of processing costs and 
minority interests), representing a store of value to 
drive future growth. 

Recognising the significance of the pandemic and 
associated lockdown measures, we moved early 
and quickly to execute a significant organisational 
change programme designed to deliver over £1m 
in annualised cost-savings, while supporting the 
recovery and future growth prospects of the Group. 
Our Personal Injury and Residential Property 
businesses were merged into a new division, 
Consumer Legal Services, combining marketing, 
IT, finance and operations to streamline activities 
and share expertise. The targeted £1m cost-savings 
were exceeded through optimising staffing levels 
under the new structure, closing our London office 
and rationalising management teams. 

Our extensive experience in managing change and 
our culture of strong staff engagement ensured 
that our people embraced these changes, setting 
the division up for a recovery once lockdown 
measures were relaxed.

Within the newly combined Consumer Legal 
Services division, the Personal Injury business 
benefitted from a reassuring recovery in demand 
through the summer months and the number of no-
fault accidents naturally increased to 65% of 2019 
levels across Q3. The subsequent imposition of 
tiered restrictions and the eventual second national 
lockdown saw a corresponding decrease in activity, 
but at no point did lead volumes fall back to the 
lows of Q2, and Q4 delivered 55% of 2019 levels. 

Our business model once again proved its flexibility 
during this period and, as volumes improved we 
cautiously increased the proportion of our enquiries 
into National Accident Law, helping to build 
experience in the team and increase the number of 
ongoing claims.

3.  Thirdly, also in December, the business 

introduced a new digital customer journey for 
RTA claimants. Building on our digital-first 
infrastructure on top of our previously launched 
‘MyAccount’ self-service claim management 
portal, the new digital tool provides customers 
with a simple and intuitive online sign-up journey, 
meaning that a standard RTA claim can now be 
completed entirely online. Along with One Call, 
these initiatives serve to improve the speed and 
efficiency of the sign-up process and reduce the 
time spent on a case, supporting our plans to 
profitably process small claims at scale. 

In addition, the division continued the turnaround 
in the residential property business. With a robust 
marketing engine now delivering increasing 
numbers of leads, the team started work on 
improvements to our triage and processing 
capabilities, including a new customer proposition 
and CRM system that builds on the technology 
platform developed for National Accident Law. This 
was subsequently delivered in Spring 2021. 

With these initiatives delivered, and an optimised 
team and organisational structure in place, 
National Accident Law is well prepared to 
process an increasing volume of self-generated 
work from 2021, including RTA small claims. 
The next objective will be scaling National 
Accident Law to deal with this increased 
volume and continuing to balance the working 
capital investment required to process our own 
work with cash generated from our panel. 

The Residential Property business also rallied 
strongly as some of the more onerous restrictions 
on the housing market were relaxed in late spring. 
Pent-up demand, coupled with the stimulus of the 
Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) holiday on properties 
valued up to £500,000 and ongoing business 
development successes, led to consistently strong 
demand for our services throughout H2. 

Despite the highly unusual circumstances, we 
continued to make progress with our strategic 
priorities during 2020. On 2 January 2020, the 
Group terminated its partnership in its joint-venture 
law firm, National Law Partners. In December, 
we completed our three-year Personal Injury 
investment programme to prepare us for the 
forthcoming industry reforms. Following the launch 
of National Accident Law in 2019, we had identified 
three key enhancements that were required to 
be ready for the implementation of reforms, now 
scheduled for 31 May 2021. 

1.  Firstly, in June 2020, the Personal Injury 

business merged its two distinct operating 
units – a law firm regulated by the Solicitor’s 
Regulation Authority (SRA) and a claims 
management company (CMC) regulated by the 
Financial Conduct Authority. These combined 
to create a technologically-enabled law firm, 
solely regulated by the SRA, with a market 
leading brand and capable of processing 
its own work. The move to one regulator, 
and away from being a CMC, has brought 
benefits of simplification, greater flexibility 
in marketing and a significant cost-saving.

2.  Secondly, in December, the National Accident 

Law team implemented their ‘One Call’ process 
to reduce the number of touchpoints required 
to convert a lead into a claim. One Call offers 
a seamless customer sign-up journey from 
initial contact through to commencing the claim 
process with National Accident Law and initial 
results from One Call are encouraging and 
suggest an increase in the Claim Underway  
rate of c.10%.

32 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

33

Our Personal Injury transformation journey

2015

2016

2017

Proposed reforms to 
whiplash claims and 
the Small Claims limits 
announced in Autumn 
Statement

The Group commenced 
planning for a ‘new 
generation’ of personal 
injury law firms.

Establishment of our 
first joint-venture law 
firms, Your Law LLP 
and National Law 
Partners; National 
Accident Helpline 
brand relaunched

2020

2019

2018

Final preparations for RTA 
Reforms – One Regulator, 
One Call, Digital Sign-Up 
Journey. NAL winning cases 
and growing processing 
capability & volume

Launch of National Accident 
Law in April 2019; launch 
of ‘MyAccount’ claim 
management portal; launch 
of third joint-venture law 
firm, Law Together LLP; re-
platform of National Accident 
Helpline website 

Development of 
National Accident Law 
begins – a greenfield 
technology-enabled 
law firm

Critical Care performance
The performance in Critical Care was more 
resilient and revenue decreased by 16.4% 
from £13.6m to £11.3m. Underlying operating 
profit fell 28.3% from £5.0m to £3.6m at 
a margin of 31.7% (2019: 37.0%).

The year started strongly, building on a successful 
2019, with promising numbers of new Case 
Management and Expert Witness instructions in Q1. 
Whilst not immediately impacted by the COVID-19 
pandemic, Bush & Co’s clients comprise of highly 
vulnerable individuals with complex clinical needs, 
and so it was inevitable that our business would be 
affected. Initially difficulties arose from challenges 
associated with providing rehabilitation services 
and access to clients, but later instruction levels 
reduced due to fewer accidents occurring. 

As expected, Case Management services were 
first to be affected, given the typical four to six-
week time lag between an individual suffering 
a catastrophic injury and the start of their 
rehabilitation. Our Expert Witness business proved 
more resilient in the year and the impact is likely 
to be felt over subsequent years, as the nature 

of these reports means that they are generally 
commissioned several years post-injury. There 
were nevertheless delays in producing reports 
through this period as many third-party providers, 
such as insurers, the NHS, and defendant law 
firms, faced their own challenges providing timely 
information whilst dealing with the impact of the 
pandemic on their own operations.

We demonstrated, once again, that Bush & Co is 
a leader in its field with an innovative and forward-
looking response to the restrictions placed on 
the business. As elsewhere in the Group, the 
team seamlessly transitioned to remote working 
in the early days of lockdown, but also led 
industry thinking by quickly introducing online 
assessment and consultations. In an industry-
first at this scale, we provided our clients with 
tablet devices to enable them to remain in close 
contact with their Case Manager throughout 
lockdown – and beyond, in the case of those 
needing to shield. Online assessments were 
introduced to allow Expert Witness and Initial 
Needs Assessments to continue throughout, 
helping to support new business enquiries. 

We also continued our track record of innovation 
in B2B marketing, focusing our efforts on 
strengthening relationships with clients, law 
firms and associates. With the introduction of 
remote case conferences and court hearings, 
the team placed themselves at the forefront 
of innovation in this area and were recognised 
for a second consecutive year with the 
prestigious ‘Supporting the Industry Award’ at 
the Personal Injury Awards, highlighting their 
added value to the industry and their clients.

As lockdown restrictions eventually eased, we 
saw a gradual recovery in Case Management 
enquiries in H2 and Expert Witness rebounded 
strongly. Business development activity continued 
uninterrupted and we strengthened support for our 
charity partners, helping to raise money and build 
new client relationships.

In such a busy and challenging year, the team 
were honoured to be asked to produce a report to 
support the Thalidomide Trust in their successful 
bid to secure lifetime financial support for 
Thalidomide survivors. This is a great example of 
the value provided by our medico-legal reports 
and we were thrilled to hear the announcement by 
the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the March 2021 
budget and to have been able to contribute to this 
important work. 

The division continued to make progress with 
strategic initiatives that will support our recovery. 
We continued with our technology transformation 
and strengthened our management team with the 
appointment of an experienced Operations Director 
to lead this initiative. Project Svelte, our proprietary 
report writing tool designed to streamline the 
production of Expert Witness reports, progressed 
at pace throughout the year ahead of being rolled 
out in Q2 2021. Headway was also made with the 
company’s insurer proposition, with the core IT 
infrastructure completed and two associate Case 
Managers deployed to work specifically in this area.

We also appointed a Head of Care Services 
to support our ambition to be accredited for 
Treatment, Disease, Disorder, Injury (TDDI) 
cases with the Care Quality Commission. This 
accreditation will allow the business to service 
the needs of those requiring nurse-led care. 
Progress was also made in implementing fixed-fee 
Initial Need Assessments to support new client 
acquisition and we expect this to lead to market 
share growth.

In 2020, Bush & Co created 
an innovative business 
development campaign, 
delivering regular mailings 
to their customers’ homes. 
These packs included 
wellbeing items like sleep 
masks and the ‘Cosy 
Night In With Bush’ pack 
consisted of popcorn 
and other treats. These 
mailings were extremely 
well received, driving traffic 
to Bush’s social media 
accounts and keeping the 
business front of mind with 
key audiences. 

Between May and 
December it received 200 
official compliments from 
customers and its Net 
Promotor Score (NPS – the 
likelihood of the business 
being recommended to 
others) ended the year at 
67 against a legal sector 
average of 40.

34 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

35

Shared Services 
performance
The costs of the Group’s Shared Services functions 
increased in the year by £0.3m to £1.9m (2019: 
£1.6m). The increase was due to one-off costs, 
primarily from management changes. 

ii.  £0.4m in relation to the restructure of the 

Consumer Legal Services division in the first half 
of the year including closure of the London office.

iii.  £0.3m of due diligence costs relating to the 

takeover bid for the Group by Frenkel Topping. 
This comprises all costs incurred by the Group in 
connection with this transaction.

Government support
The Group made use of £0.4m of Government 
support in the form of the CJRS. This 
income is shown in the financial statements 
in underlying operating profit as netted 
off administration expenses within the 
divisional results. We also deferred VAT 
payments of £0.4m from 2020 to 2021.

At peak, the Group furloughed 82 members of staff 
and this figure reduced to two staff by the end of 
the year. The majority of these staff were in the 
operations areas of our businesses, which were 
overstaffed following the reduction in enquiries 
due to the pandemic. Had the CJRS not been in 
place then the Group would have undoubtedly been 
forced to cut costs further and this is likely to have 
involved additional redundancies. The Board was 
pleased to have been able to utilise this scheme 
and are in no doubt that it has enabled us to retain a 
large proportion of our workforce.

Exceptional and non-
underlying items
The Group’s accounting policy, set out in note 1 to 
the financial statements, is to separately identify 
exceptional and non-underlying items and exclude 
them from underlying performance measures to 
provide readers of the financial statements with a 
consistent basis on which to track the core trading 
performance.

The Group incurred a number of exceptional 
items in the year which are set out in note 4 to the 
financial statements totalling £1.4m (2019: £7.9m). 
These include the following.

i.  £0.6m of restructuring costs associated with the 
strategic transformation of the Group’s personal 
injury business. These costs relate to the activities 
described above and as this transformation is now 
complete, 2020 is the final year of such costs. 

Taxation
The Group’s tax charge of £2,000 (2019: 
£635,000) represents an effective tax rate of 
(0.9)% (2019: (27.3)%). The effective tax rate 
is lower than the standard corporation tax rate 
of 19.0% for the reasons set out in note 9 to the 
financial statements. The deferred tax credit 
originates from temporary differences in intangible 
assets acquired on business combinations.

Earnings per share (EPS) 
and dividend
Underlying EPS for the year was 1.9p (2019: 9.4p). 
Underlying EPS provides a better comparison year-
on-year as earnings have been adjusted to exclude 
certain exceptional items (net of the standard rate 
of corporation tax). This is explained in note 1 to the 
financial statements. 

Basic EPS for the year was (0.5)p (2019: (6.4)
p) and the diluted EPS was (0.5)p (2019: (6.4)p). 
In line with IAS 33, as the Group has a negative 
earnings per share, it is assumed that there are no 
dilutive shares.

The fall in EPS is due to a reduction in volume 
of enquiries in the personal injury business and 
Critical Care division as a result of the measures 
taken by the Government in response to the 
COVID-19 pandemic. The effects of these measures 
are explained in more detail above.

The Board does not believe it is appropriate to 
reinstate dividends at this time and the Directors 
have recommended that no final dividend be paid in 
respect of 2020. 

Net debt and bank 
facilities
The Group carefully managed its cash resources 
during the year and took a number of actions to 
conserve cash. As a result, net debt at year-end 
reduced from £21.0m at 31 December 2019 to 
£16.3m at year-end. Net debt is defined in note 29 
to the financial statements and is comprised of 
£3.6m of cash (2019: £2.6m) offset by borrowings 
of £19.9m (2019: £23.6m).

The borrowings represent a balance on the Group’s 
revolving credit facility (RCF) with its lender, 
Yorkshire/Clydesdale Bank. In last year’s Final 
Results, the Group highlighted that it may breach 
its banking covenants during 2020 and that it was 
in positive discussions with its lender to remedy 
this. On 23 July 2020, the Board announced that 
these discussions had concluded successfully 
and new covenants had been agreed. Importantly, 
the Group remained in full covenant compliance 
throughout the year and we expect this to continue 
through to the end of the facility term. As part of 
that agreement, Yorkshire/Clydesdale Bank also 
agreed to extend the facility term for a further 12 
months, through to 31 December 2022.

Reduction in net debt from 
£21.0m to

£16.3m

Review of the statement of 
financial position
In reviewing the statement of financial position, I 
consider the significant items to be working capital, 
defined as trade and other receivables less trade 
and other payables, and net debt.

Working capital
Trade and other receivables less trade and other 
payables totalled £16.7m at year-end, which is 
£5.1m less than last year (2019: £21.8m after 
adjusting for the disposal of NLP). I am pleased 
with the reduction in working capital in the year, 
which has been achieved by placing an increased 
proportion of personal injury enquiries into the 
panel to drive in-year cash flow, and by realising 
growth in settlements relating to historical claims. 
This has helped to increase cash flows and reduce 
net debt.

Trade receivables and accrued income balances 
related to the processing of personal injury claims 
increased from £4.3m to £7.3m as the Consumer 
Legal Services division increased the number of 
new claims placed into its law firms. These claims 
are yet to reach the settlement stage but have all 
had liability admitted by the defendant, in line with 
the Group’s accounting policy for legal services 
revenue in note 1 to the financial statements.

There is a significant element of uncertainty in 
estimating the work in progress recognised in our 
law firms, as discussed further in note 1 to the 
financial statements. The Directors believe that the 
assumptions adopted are appropriate and based 
on historical experience of claims processed in our 
law firms and by our panel. These assumptions are 
updated with actual results as claims settle. 

Through the flexibility provided by our business 
model, we were able to offset this investment with 
a significant reduction in trade receivables and 
accrued income balances associated with our panel 
relationships in the year. This reduced from £19.2m 
at 31 December 2019 to £13.7m at 31 December 
2020, largely through collecting cash on historical 
deals with our panel members. Included within this, 
is £2.9m (2019: £4.3m) of accrued income relating 
to non-contingent future settlements relating to the 
termination of the Group’s partnership in National 
Law Partners. £1.4m of cash was received in 2020 
in relation to this deal and the remaining amount is 
due to be settled by the end of April 2022.

36 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

37

Our people and values
Our people have always been a source of strength 
for the Group and in 2020 that strength translated 
into improved business resilience. Our Group 
Values have always been central to the way that 
we do business and last year having a team that is 
Driven, Unified, Passionate and Curious was more 
important than ever.

In response to the pandemic, management 
recognised the importance of visibility of 
leadership and regular communications with 
staff. A series of weekly briefings and monthly 
‘town hall’ type events were all delivered remotely 
and were extremely well received. These allowed 
management to demonstrate their commitment 
to open, honest and transparent communications, 
even in the hardest of times, and was consistent 
with the Group’s four principles of operation that 
guided our COVID-19 response (page 19). 

Conscious that at times throughout the year a 
proportion of our staff was placed on furlough to 
support the business needs, we ensured this group 
were included in our communications and I was 
pleased with how engaged the business remained. I 
would like to thank everyone who spent some time 
on furlough over the past year for the important 
sacrifice they made for the success of the Group.

Staff wellbeing was a focus for our management 
teams in 2020. A range of activities were delivered 
such as ongoing training and yoga. These were 
designed to stimulate and support staff who were 
each going through their own personal challenges. 

We were rewarded for our people culture with 
incredibly high engagement scores in our annual 
staff survey, far exceeding national benchmarks. 

We were pleased to receive external validation 
when Investors in People awarded its Silver status 
to our Residential Property business as well as 
Gold standard for Critical Care, adding to the same 
award given to our personal injury business in 2019. 

Review of the cash flow 
statement
Free cash flow (FCF) is the Group’s KPI with 
regards to cash flow (see page 14) and I am 
pleased to report that the Group increased FCF 
from £(1.7)m in 2019 to £6.1m in 2020. As noted 
above, this increase was achieved by maximising 
the placement of new personal injury claims into 
the panel and by realising an increasing level 
of settlements from historical claims, as well 
as £0.4m of VAT deferred into 2021.  Cash on 
historical claims includes the £1.4m received in 
the period in relation to the termination of our 
partnership in National Law Partners. 

The Group also monitors underlying cash 
conversion, which increased to 228.9% in the year 
(2019: 47.4%). 

On a statutory basis, the Group increased cash 
and cash equivalents by £1.0m in the year (2019: 
£1.0m). This was primarily the result of an increase 
in net cash generated from operating activities, 
partially offset by a repayment of borrowings. Other 
significant items include payments made to our 
partners in the joint-venture ABS law firms and 
the acquisition of intangible assets. Net cash from 
operating activities increased from £1.5m in 2019 
to £11.0m in 2020. A key factor influencing this was 
the strong positive working capital movements 
achieved in the year, which is discussed above. 
Also, the reduction in profits last year resulted in 
£1.0m less tax being paid in 2020 compared to the 
previous year.

£3.2m (2019: £2.2m) of drawings were paid to 
our partners in the joint-venture law firms during 
the year under the terms of our agreements. This 
increase year-on-year reflects the growth in claims 
won and settled during the year. The Group also 
acquired £0.8m of intangible assets in the year 
(2019: £0.5m). These were linked to upgrades in 
the call centre technology and digital journey in 
our Consumer Legal Services division, as well as 
technology improvements and the development of 
our proprietary Expert Witness report writing tool in 
Critical Care.

The Group repaid £3.8m of borrowings 
in the year (2019: draw down of £6.5m 
of borrowings) on its RCF. 

Brands
The Group’s two divisions have a long history 
of brand-building investment in their respective 
markets (more than 25 years in the case of 
National Accident Helpline and 35 years for 
Bush & Co). Over the years this investment has 
created high levels of brand equity amongst our 
target customers, with National Accident Helpline 
commanding a position amongst the very best-
known and most-trusted consumer brands in the 
personal injury sector, and Bush & Co maintaining a 
similarly strong position in the minds of client firms 
in the catastrophic injury sector. 

In the case of National Accident Helpline, this 
underlying strength allowed us to make a 
tactical choice to flex our brand marketing spend 
through the year in line with anticipated return 
on investment: when the market was functioning 
normally at the start of the year, we aired new TV 
adverts building on our established ‘when its wrong, 
make it right’ campaign, but stopped advertising 
as the volume of accidents reduced. A decision to 
resume brand advertising will be made according 
to the potential for positive returns as the market 
opens up, the volume of potential customers 
increases, and post-pandemic media consumption 
patterns are established.

Bush & Co is predominantly a B2B brand, but the 
strength and innovative marketing approaches of 
the brand helped the business development team 
nevertheless maintain and build client relationships 
throughout lockdown. 

Since the Group acquired Fitzalan Partners in 2015, 
our residential property business has developed a 
market leading organic search presence through 
the use of several established websites. A project 
was commenced in 2020 to streamline its brand 
proposition to provide greater focus on the brand 
that drives most of the volume and reduces the 
cost of supporting a broad brand portfolio. This 
culminated in the re-launch of our Homeward Legal 
brand in Q1 2021, which enjoys strong support from 
first-time buyers and is well placed to exploit the 
paid search market in the future.

Diversity in our people
Key to the success of 
our people agenda is 
maintaining a positive 
gender balance in our 
leadership, management 
and staff bodies. Our 
gender balance statistics 
at 31 December 2020 
are as follows.

Board
male to female

60:40

(2019: 50:50)

All staff
male to female

34:66

(2019: 37:63)

In 2020, our Leadership Team concluded 
that it wanted to promote increased diversity 
across our workforce and it introduced a 
series of initiatives, including formal training, 
mentoring and an action group of influential 
colleagues from across the Group, to develop 
this objective and to enhance our culture. The 
Group strongly believes that having a more 
diverse workforce can help to attract and 
retain the best talent and make an important 
contribution to the success and sustainability 
of our business.

38 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

39

From 31 May 2021, we will process all RTA enquiries 
in National Accident Law and in the second half 
of 2021, if conditions allow, we plan to process an 
increasing number of non-RTA enquiries. 

Looking further ahead, and assuming the continued 
success of the UK vaccination programme and 
the current timetable for bringing COVID-19 
restrictions to an end, we anticipate a return to the 
pre-pandemic trends in our markets in 2022. We 
expect personal injury enquiry levels to increase 
sequentially each quarter this year and to deliver 
80–90% of 2019 levels by December 2021. In 
Critical Care, we forecast the market will return 
to pre-pandemic levels of catastrophic injuries 
during 2022 with a similar delay between accident 
and instruction as before, although expert witness 
instruction will be subject to some longer-term 
softening in market volumes resulting from 
depressed volumes in the preceeding 14 months. If 
these forecasts are correct, we would expect to see 
growth in 2021 revenue and profit in both divisions 
compared to 2020. 

Finally, NAHL is a group built around a strong 
values-based culture with talented and committed 
people at its heart. This year has highlighted their 
resilience and adaptability in the most extreme of 
circumstances. I would like to thank them all for 
their exceptional work during a challenging year.

James Saralis 
Chief Financial Officer 
4 June 2021

Potential sale of our 
Residential Property 
business
Over the last two years, the Group has completed 
significant strides to reposition and streamline the 
operations of its Residential Property business.  
The business has performed well through the 
pandemic and we believe is now positioned to 
grow profitably in the years to come due to its 
strong marketing and lead generation capabilities 
and full suite search business.  However, the 
market for conveyancing and residential property 
services continues to consolidate with several 
large acquisitive platforms emerging.   Having 
observed these trends and in light of several in-
bound enquiries, the Board has decided to formally 
investigate a potential sale of the Residential 
Property business, and will be launching this 
process in the coming weeks.

Conclusion and outlook
2020 saw the Group demonstrate its trading 
resilience through a year of unprecedented market 
change. The impact of the pandemic on our 
businesses was severe but we remained profitable, 
reduced net debt and de-risked the balance sheet. 

In doing so, we delayed scaling National Accident 
Law but we made progress with our personal injury 
transformation and have created a new, sustainable 
business model and we will be ready for the 
industry reforms being introduced on 31 May 2021. 

Since the year-end, the third national lockdown 
in January 2021 caused another reduction in the 
number of accidents, which again impacted our 
business. The volume of personal injury enquiries 
in Q1 2021 fell to 46% of 2019 (pre-COVID) levels, 
albeit that this increased to 57% in April. 

Revenue in the first four months of the year was 
in line with the Board’s expectations at 19% below 
2019, reflecting the impact of the third lockdown 
on volumes but importantly also reflecting the 
increased investment in processing enquiries in 
National Accident Law . In this period in 2021, 
over 1,600 enquiries were placed into National 
Accident Law , including over 80% of all of our 
self-generated RTA enquiries. In 2019 this figure 
was just over 100 new claims demonstrating 
how far the business has come in processing 
its own claims. This investment will generate 
profits and cash later in 2021 and beyond. 

40 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Strategic  
Priorities

202020192018To drive value through our business model the division’s strategic priorities are:

Consumer Legal Services

Strategic Priority

Description

2020 Focus & Progress

2021 Focus

Strategic Priority

Description

2020 Focus & Progress

2021 Focus

Efficient 
claim 
processing

Our People

Underpinned by 
our technology 
platform and 
investments 
in processing 
capability 
which will give 
us the option 
to profitably 
process a wide 
range of claim 
types

An agile, 
proactive and 
highly engaged 
workforce 
united in our 
values

Further ramp-up 
of NAL processing 
capacity following 
launch in April 2019.

Development of NAL capability 
to process both RTA (including 
small claims) and non-RTA 
claims. This further increases 
our placement options, per 
our flexible business model.

Focused on safeguarding 
our people, transitioning 
to remote working and 
maintaining engagement 
whilst delivering the right 
customer outcomes, solid 
trading results in context 
and progressing strategic 
priorities. 

Delivering the transition to a 
post-pandemic operating model, 
with a lower-cost blend of remote 
and office-based working that 
supports our people and our 
customers, whilst maximising 
value creation for shareholders. 

Leading 
trusted 
brands 

We operate well-
known brands 
that are trusted 
by consumers 
and partners

New TV campaign aired 
through Q1, paused for the 
balance of 2020 as market 
demand and Return on 
Investment (ROI) dropped.

TV advertising investment is 
constantly under review, pending 
a recovery in market demand that 
supports positive ROI from Above-
The-Line spend. 

Optimal 
enquiry 
volume and 
cost

We invest 
in efficient 
marketing 
to attract 
consumers to 
our websites 
and convert 
visitors to leads

Optimising 
customer 
experience

We create 
industry-leading 
digital and 
offline customer 
journeys

Transitioning from a claims 
management company to a 
law firm.

Ongoing focus on SEO 
that supported organic 
enquiry volumes, resulting 
in positive impact from 
Google algorithm updates.

Continued Paid Search 
Optimisation to balance 
Cost per Enquiry with 
Return on Advertising 
Spend. 

Conversion Rate 
Optimisation (CRO) – 
increasing the % of website 
visitors opting to seek our 
support. 

Launch of improved 
customer journey via:
    One Call – a seamless 
triage and sign-up call 
for customers of NAL, 
eliminating disruptive 
handovers
    New digital sign-
up journey for RTA 
claimants, simplifying and 
speeding up the process 
for straightforward cases

Consolidation of multiple 
Residential Property websites into 
one core brand: Homeward Legal, 
a proven asset in this market with 
an established read Search Engine 
Optimisation (SEO) profile.

Continued focus in all three areas, 
including:
    strengthening our in-house 
content development team 
to support organic search 
performance
    further increase use of first-
party data to improve search 
performance
    ongoing CRO programme to 
maximise click-through rate, 
visitor-to-lead and lead-to-
enquiry conversion

Further enhancements to include:
    Updating the “MyAccount” 
digital self-service portal to 
facilitate seamless processing of 
RTA Small Claims 
    Extending the digital sign-up 
journey for claimants with non-
RTA cases, bringing the speed 
and simplicity benefits to these 
higher-value cases
    New CRM software for the 
Homeward Legal (Residential 
Property) business 

42 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

43

Critical Care

Strategic Priority

Description

2020 Focus & Progress

2021 Focus

A trusted, 
high-quality 
B2B brand

Defendant 
proposition

Focus on 
business 
development

Leading 
Associate 
group

Developing 
Technology

Our People

A leading B2B 
brand with 35 
years service to 
the Catastrophic 
Injury market 

Moving into 
lower value 
claims within the 
same market

We build 
deep and 
long-standing 
relationships 
across a broad 
client base

We exclusively 
work with 
experienced, 
highly regarded 
Associate 
Expert 
Witnesses and 
Case Managers 
covering a 
wide range of 
specialisms

We develop 
bespoke 
technology 
solutions to 
support quality 
and increase 
efficiency for 
clients and 
Associates

An agile, 
proactive and 
highly engaged 
team 

Invested in CRM and, 
integrated marketing and 
business development, 

Expansion of the brand 
into adjacent sectors and 
differentiated marketing across 
personal injury and clinical 
negligence.

Building relationships with 
insurers.

Developing client and customer 
portal and workflow.

Maintain relationships with 
law firms and other sources 
of instruction through 
innovative B2B marketing.

Utilising JVs to build brand, and 
host multi-customer events.

Supported Associates to 
continue to deliver services 
throughout lockdown 
through innovative 
technology solutions, 
building the Bush & Co 
brand amongst Case 
Managers and Expert 
Witnesses. 

Launch Care Quality Commission 
(CQC) accredited nurse-
led care service to support 
catastrophically injured clients.

Build customised service to 
Associates to further tailor to 
client’s needs.

Online assessment and 
case conferences 

Technology projects 
continued as planned. 

Launch our new proprietary digital 
medico-legal report writing tool 
for Expert Witness in Q2.

Focused on safeguarding 
our people, transitioning 
to remote working and 
maintaining engagement 
whilst delivering the 
right outcomes for the 
people we support, 
solid trading results in 
context and progressing 
strategic priorities. 

Delivering the transition to a 
post-pandemic operating model, 
with a lower-cost blend of remote 
and office-based working that 
supports our people and our 
customers, whilst maximising 
value creation for shareholders. 

44 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Principal  
risks and  
uncertainties

Principal  
risks and  
uncertainties

The Board is mindful of the detrimental impact that the Group’s 
principal risks and uncertainties could have on its ability to 
deliver on its strategic priorities. It seeks to identify, assess and 
manage these risks through its risk management framework 
and regular reporting and review, combined with additional 
assurance work. Whilst the Board has ultimate responsibility for 
risk, it is supported by the Audit & Risk Committee, Executive 
Directors and management.

Our risk management 
framework
The Board maintains a risk management 
framework (figure 1, page 48) that combines a top-
down strategic assessment of risk with a bottom-
up operational identification and reporting process.

The regular review of existing risks and 
identification of emerging risks is managed 
through quarterly risk reviews between divisional 
management and Executive Directors. Once risks 
are identified and the Group’s appetite for each risk 
determined, risks are prioritised, and mitigating 
actions implemented.

Risk appetite
Every year, the Board reviews and sets the 
Group’s appetite for risk. This is done by 
attributing a score to each one of seven 
separate risk categories that the Board has 
identified. The categories are as follows.

1. Strategic

2. Transformation

3. Operational

4. Financial

5. People and culture

6. Regulatory

7. IT, systems and data security

They are scored on a scale of 1 (lowest risk) to 12 
(highest risk) and a score of 1–3 is described as an 
averse appetite; 4–6 is a cautious appetite; 7–9 is 
balanced appetite; and 10–12 is an entrepreneurial 
appetite. Individual risks are allocated a category 
and the associated risk appetite then informs 
management’s approach to mitigating that risk.

Risk identification and 
reporting
Divisional management conducts an ongoing 
process of identification and assessment of 
key risks (both financial and non-financial) 
faced by their division. This includes the 
identification of emerging risks, whether 
from structural changes in their markets or 
transformation activity within the business.

Risks are collated on a risk register along with 
mitigating actions that reduce the residual risk to 
an acceptable level, with reference to the Board’s 
appetite. Residual risks are assessed according to 
their likelihood of occurrence and potential impact 
on the profitability and cash flow of the Group.
Divisional risk registers are reviewed quarterly by 
the Executive Directors and risks are prioritised 
across the Group. The highest rated risks are 
denoted principal risks and are reported by the 
Executive Directors to the Audit & Risk Committee 
and the Board.

46 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

47

Figure 1 – Risk management framework

The principal risks identified are detailed below:

i

S
t
r
a
t
e
g
c
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
o
f

r
i
s
k
a
n
d
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
s
a
t
i
o
n

Board

Ultimate responsibility for risk management 
  Sets strategic priorities 
  Agrees the Group’s appetite for each risk category 
  Top down risk identification 
  Delegates authority

Audit & Risk 
Committee

Monitors effectiveness of risk management 
through reporting and assurance 
  Sets scope of external audit 
  Monitors internal controls through internal reviews 
  Reviews critical accounting judgements and estimates

Executive 
Directors

Monitor performance and changes  
in key risk 
  Provide regular reports and updates to the Board 
    Report to the Board and Audit & Risk Committee on  
key risks
    Provide guidance and advice to divisional management 
through quarterly risk reviews

Divisional 
management

Identifies, manages and reports local risks 
  Maintains local risk registers and mitigation plans 
  Regular assessments of emerging risks 
  Implements mitigation plans 
   Reports quarterly to Executive Directors on risk

g
n
i
t
r
o
p
e
r
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
a
c
i
f
i
t
n
e
d

i

k
s
i
R

Category

Financial

£

Risk 
Appetite

Cautious 
(6/12)

Description

Credit exposure
The Group has a number of 
historic and ongoing arrangements 
with law firm customers, some 
of which involve deferred 
payments, and which create a 
credit risk in the event of their 
insolvency or a dispute. 

Financial

£

Cautious 
(6/12)

Transformation

Balanced 
(7/12)

Accuracy of business 
model assumptions 
(including impact of 
COVID-19)
The Group’s business model 
relies on several key assumptions 
which, if not delivered, have a 
material impact on financial 
performance and strategy. Some 
of these assumptions could be 
impacted by an elongation of the 
COVID-19 pandemic. These include 
assumptions relating to:  
   Enquiry generation costs and 
volumes 
  Case processing performance 
  Small claims processing efficiency 
  Volume of critical care instructions

Delivery of key strategic 
projects
The Group has several key strategic 
projects underway and a delay 
or failure to deliver any of these 
could have a material impact on its 
financial plan. 

Mitigation

The Group’s Financial risk 
appetite has reduced from 
balanced to cautious. The Group 
has processes to approve credit 
limits and monitor exposures 
and has adopted a more cautious 
approach when considering 
deferred terms for panel law 
firms. Contractual provisions 
such as set-off clauses are in 
place to mitigate the risk for 
material debts. Credit exposure 
is not material in the Critical Care 
division due to the dilution of risk 
between multiple customers.

Model assumptions are 
determined by management 
with oversight from Executive 
Directors and the Board. 
Sensitivities are performed on 
the key assumptions. The model 
assumptions are scrutinised and 
compared to actual results on a 
regular basis. The 2021 budget 
factored in assumptions relating 
to an ongoing COVID-19 impact 
on instruction volumes and other 
key metrics across the Group . 
Additional measures have been 
taken to de-risk assumptions by 
securing additional contractual 
guarantees from key partners. 

Oversight of strategic projects is 
provided by the Executive Director 
and the Board. Dedicated project 
management resource is in place 
to support delivery with a strong 
focus from the management 
teams. Progress is in line with plan 
on all the Group’s key strategic 
projects, including changes 
required to process small claims 
from 31 May 2021. 

48 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

49

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Category

Regulatory

Risk 
Appetite

Cautious 
(4/12)

Financial

Cautious 
(6/12)

£

IT, systems and 
data security

Cautious 
(4/12)

Description

Regulatory Breaches 
The Consumer Legal Services 
division operates in a highly 
regulated environment and 
handles high volumes of sensitive 
customer data including credit card 
information & medical data. The 
division also handles client money. 
The Group’s law firms are regulated 
by the Solicitors Regulation 
Authority. Breaches of regulations 
could result in regulatory action 
against those businesses, directors 
and compliance officers. 

Critical care is required to be 
audited by the CQC and any failings 
could create reputational damage 
and loss of customers.

Critical Care self-employed 
associate model
New IR35 legislation requires 
careful interpretation to ensure 
arrangements do not breach tax 
laws, resulting in unexpected tax 
charges and fines.

Loss of key self-employed 
associates and caseloads could 
create a revenue impact if 
associates are not replaced. A 
consequence of this could be 
disruption to the self-employed 
model, a lack of associates willing 
to provide specialist services and 
potentially lost revenues if services 
provided by associates cannot be 
replaced. 

IT Infrastructure and 
Security 
Many of the Group’s interactions 
with its customers are online and 
we are reliant on our IT systems 
to capture and protect valuable 
customer data obtained in the 
normal course of business. Theft, 
loss and misappropriation of 
digital assets and data could result 
in reputational damage and/or 
regulatory fines. The Group relies 
on a number key IT suppliers and its 
systems are increasingly automated 
creating an increased exposure to 
systems error. 

Mitigation

Description

Key Person Dependency
Unavailability or loss of key 
individuals could have a detrimental 
impact on business performance. 
Significant Intellectual property, 
relationships and experience 
is held by certain members of 
management. If they became 
unavailable there could be a 
short-term impact on operational 
performance and the progress of 
key projects. 

Working capital 
management
The Group is investing in working 
capital as it builds its book of 
personal injury claims in its ABS law 
firms. These claims can take up to 
2–3 years to process and it is at the 
settlement point of each successful 
claim that cash is received. The 
Group is also investing in strategic 
change projects in both divisions in 
order to generate future growth. 

This is against the backdrop of 
reduced revenues and enhanced 
credit risk resulting from the 
COVID-19 pandemic, for an 
uncertain period of time. Whilst the 
Group generated £6.1m of FCF in 
2020, if this were to change and the 
Group ran out of capital before the 
book of claims matures then it could 
fail to capitalise on the opportunity, 
miss its financial forecasts and the 
bank could demand repayment of 
the debt facility 

Both divisions employ dedicated 
compliance resources 
responsible for managing 
compliance issues and reporting 
directly to the Board.

External legal advice is taken, 
including from leading counsel 
where appropriate. Advice is 
taken where new regulatory risks 
arise from changes to internal 
processes / structure or new 
legalisation / regulation. 

The Critical Care division employs 
a clinical governance team which 
reports monthly to divisional 
management.

The Board has taken external 
advice by a leading accountancy 
and tax firm and made the 
necessary status determinations 
for each associate. These 
decisions are supported by 
contractual terms, operational 
processes and working practices 
currently in place. Bush & Co 
regularly monitors compliance 
with these processes and has 
controls in place to ensure the 
risk of a breach of the legislation 
is low. 

The Group takes data security 
very seriously. The Board has 
undertaken a review of processes 
and controls relating to cyber 
security during 2021. 

The Group has robust policies 
and procedures to ensure it 
is compliant with the Data 
Protection Act 2018 and 
the General Data Protection 
Regulations (GDPR).

Business Continuity plans are in 
place, the Group’s employees are 
provided with regular training and 
the cyber security controls are 
regularly stress tested.

Category

People & 
Culture

Risk 
Appetite

Balanced 
(8/12)

Financial

£

Cautious 
(6/12)

Mitigation

There is a succession plan in place 
covering all key individuals and no 
one person is responsible for any 
key relationship. Bonus schemes 
and share options are put in 
place to support retention of 
key employees and are regularly 
reviewed by the Renumeration 
Committee. There has been a 
significant focus on staff wellbeing 
in response to COVID-19 

The Board closely monitors the 
use of capital and uses short and 
medium-term forecasts to plan 
future requirements. Day-to-
day capital is provided through 
the Group’s revolving credit 
facility (RCF) with Yorkshire/
Clydesdale Bank and levels 
of utilisation and compliance 
with the debt covenants is 
reviewed on a monthly basis 
by the Executive Directors 
and reported to the Board. 

The Board have suspended 
dividend payments in order to 
reduce debt and thereby reduce 
this risk. Decisions around future 
dividends will be made with 
consideration to future capital 
requirements. 

50 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

51

Our customers
The Group’s customers fall into two distinct 
categories covering both business-to-business 
and business-to-consumer sectors and the Group 
is committed servicing them both effectively. Our 
business-to- business customers are supported by 
dedicated partnership and business development 
teams who work to ensure that all parties are 
satisfied with the management of the relationship 
and its results. Our business-to-consumer 
customers benefit from the empathic expertise of 
our teams of highly trained employees. The Group 
further invests in its technologies with a view to 
ensuring that this customer base has a market-
leading consumer experience.

Our suppliers
The Group works with a number of key suppliers, 
primarily providers of marketing support services, 
technology providers, self-employed associates 
and search agents and surveyors. Again, each 
division has dedicated marketing and operations 
teams who work closely with these suppliers to 
ensure the successful delivery of these services for 
both parties.

Section 172 Statement  
and Stakeholder  
Engagement

Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires a director of 
a company to act in the way he or she considers, in good faith, 
would be most likely to promote the success of the company for 
the benefit of its members as a whole. In doing this, Section 172 
requires a Director to have regard, among other matters, to:

   the likely consequences of any decision in the 
long-term;

   the interests of the company’s employees;

   the need to foster the company’s business 
relationships with suppliers, customers and 
others;

   the impact of the company’s operations on the 
community and the environment;

   the desirability of the company maintaining 
a reputation for high standards of business 
conduct; and

   the need to act fairly with members of the 
company.

The key decisions made by the Board during the 
year were:

   Flexing the placement of enquiries in personal 
injury to focus on short term cash and profits 
in order to safeguard the ability of the Group to 
operate in the short term by meeting its debts 
as they fall due and operating within its banking 
covenants (see page 32 for further details)

   Merging the personal injury and residential 
property divisions to create a new Consumer 
Legal Services division, identifying annualised 
cost savings in the process of £1.2m which will 
streamline operations and support the recovery 
and future growth prospects of the Group (see 
page 32 for more details)

   Continuing with its strategic plans in personal 
injury to transition from a claims management 
company to a law firm in preparation for the 
small claims reforms in May 2021, positioning 
the division to be ready for small claims and 
processing an increasing number of enquiries in 
National Accident Law to generate higher profits 
(see page 33 for more details).

The Directors give careful consideration to the 
factors set out above in discharging their duties 
under Section 172. Further detail on the long- 
term strategy and the Board’s decision-making 
driving this can be found in the Chair’s Report and 
Operating Review on page 28. Our trusted brands 
(Operating Review, page 35), Industry awards 
(Operating review, page 35) and Investors in People 
(Operating Review, page 38) are all testament to 
how the business strives to maintain its reputation 
for high standards of business conduct.

The Board sees the value of building and 
maintaining strong relationships with its key 
stakeholders, who are identified below. 

Our employees
The business is committed to open and transparent 
communication with its staff, primarily through 
the delivery of bi-monthly all-staff meetings where 
strategic and performance updates are delivered by 
the Executive Director and the senior management 
team and two-way communication is encouraged. 
In addition to gathering feedback throughout the 
year through regular meetings, the company also 
encourages employees to share their views via its 
annual staff survey, the results of which are shared 
and actions taken as a result. Colleagues are invited 
to invest directly into the company’s performance 
through its Save As You Earn share schemes which 
are open to all employees. For more information 
about our people, please see Our Culture, Our 
Business on page 18. 

52 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

53

 100%clean energy at our Daventry office

Our investors
The Group aims to maintain an ongoing dialogue 
with shareholders throughout the year, to manage 
their expectations and understand the motivation 
behind shareholder voting decisions. Our Investors 
section of our website (www.nahlgroupplc.co.uk/
investors) explains how we have sought to do 
this, including engaging with investors through 
our Annual General Meeting and meeting larger 
shareholders during twice-yearly roadshows 
following the announcement of the full year and 
interim results. The Chair is available to meet 
investors as required. The Board seeks to manage 
investor expectations whilst striving to make the 
right decisions as it navigates the ever-changing 
markets in which it operates; aiming to strike a 
balance between long-term shareholder value and 
short-term business needs.

Our communities and the 
environment
While our businesses have limited direct impact 
on the environment we are mindful of our 
responsibility in this regard. To this end, a staff 
body has been developed to look at ways that 
our businesses can limit their impact on the 
environment. Recent successes include the 
Critical Care division’s new offices using 100% 
clean energy and the Consumer Legal Services 
main office using recycled refrigeration for its air 
conditioning. Our employees remain committed to 
their local communities.

Our employees remain committed to their local 
communities and the Group supports organisations 
both nationally, as with Paradance UK, and local 
through Food Banks local to its office bases.

Our employees remain committed to their local 
communities and the Group supports organisations 
both nationally, as with Paradance UK, and local 
through Food Banks local to its office bases.

This strategic report was approved by the Board on 
4 June 2021 and signed on its behalf by:

Tim Aspinall 
Chair

54 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

2020

01 02 03 04 05 06 07
01 02 03 04 05 06 07

08 09 10 11 12 13 14
08 09 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21
15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28
22 23 24 25 26 27 28

30
30

Leadership and 
Governance

Board  
of  
Directors
Tim Aspinall

Gillian Kent

Brian Phillips

Non-Executive Director
Brian joined the Board on 25 
June 2020 as a Non-Executive 
Director.

He has had a long and 
distinguished career in private 

equity and in 2014 stepped back from full time 
employment to build a portfolio of investments 
using his own capital. He later used this experience 
and extensive contacts in the field to start Ethos 
Partners LLP in 2017, which is a private investment 
office operating in the UK small cap and private 
equity market.

During his executive career, Brian was previously 
the Chief Investment Officer for Greenhill Capital 
Partners in London where he was recruited to set 
up a new private equity business for Greenhill & 
Co., a listed US investment bank. Previous to this 
he was Managing Director for L&G Ventures and a 
Director at various firms including Bridgepoint and 
Gartmore Private Capital.

Brian is a Chartered Accountant and member of the 
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

Non-Executive Chair
Tim Aspinall became Chair in 
October 2020, having been a 
Non-Executive Director since 
June 2016. He sits on the 
Group’s Remuneration and 

Nomination Committees and attends Audit and 
Risk Committee by invitation. 

Tim runs Aspinall Consultants Limited, a 
management consultancy business advising 
professional services firms on strategy, 
performance management and mergers and 
acquisitions.

Tim is also a Non-Executive Director of Kuro Health 
Limited which is one of the leading providers of 
medical reports in the UK. Tim is a qualified solicitor 
and his senior leadership career in the legal sector 
includes Managing Partner of DMH Stallard LLP 
where he led its transformation into an award 
winning and highly respected mid-market law firm.

James Saralis

Chief Financial Officer
James Saralis is Chief Financial 
Officer of the Group, which 
he joined in January 2018. 
His responsibilities include 
implementing the strategy 
agreed by the Board, managing the day-to-day 
operations of the Group and liaising with the 
Group’s investors and banks.

James brings with him a wealth of experience both 
operationally and of the AIM market. Previously, 
he spent over 10 years in the general insurance 
industry, most recently as CFO of the Direct & 
Partnerships and Employee Benefit divisions of 
Jelf, part of Marsh & McLennan Companies. James 
has also held various finance roles in Clearspeed 
Technology plc, HBOS plc and RAC plc.

He is a Chartered Accountant and a fellow of the 
ICAEW, having been a member since 2003. He 
holds a Bachelor of Science from the University  
of Bristol.

Non-Executive Director
Gillian Kent became Non- 
Executive Director in November 
2014 and is Chair of the Group’s 
Remuneration Committee and 
Nomination Committee. She 

also sits on the Audit & Risk Committee. 

Gillian is also an independent Non-Executive 
Director at Ascential plc, Mothercare plc and 
SIG plc. Her executive career in the digital and 
online sectors includes Managing Director of 
Microsoft’s largest online business in the UK. 
Gillian has also served as Chief Executive Officer 
and Digital Consultant at GK Associates, Chief 
Executive Officer at Propertyfinder.com, Marketing 
Director and Director of Strategy and Business 
Development at Microsoft (MSN).

Sally Tilleray

Non-Executive Director
Sally Tilleray became Non- 
Executive Director on 19 July 
2019 and is Chair of the Group’s 
Audit & Risk Committee, as well 
as sitting on the Remuneration 

and Nomination Committees.

Sally founded her own consulting business and 
is currently Chair of digital agency Kagool, Chair 
of marketing communications firm Cognito and 
Senior Independent Non-Executive Director of 
Mind Gym plc, the AIM listed psychology based 
organisational improvement group.

In her executive career, Sally was previously joint 
Group Chief Operating Officer and Finance Director 
at Huntsworth plc, the international healthcare and 
communications firm, where she was responsible 
for the Group’s worldwide financial functions and 
day-to-day operations. Prior to this, she served 
as CFO Europe for Predictive Inc., a technology 
consulting business which listed on Nasdaq in 
2000. She is a member of the Chartered Institute 
of Management Accountants.

56 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

57

Executive  
Management  
Team
Simon Trott

Chief Operating Officer 
– Consumer Legal 
Services 
Simon is responsible for 
the executive leadership & 
operations of the Consumer 

Legal Services division, which includes 
National Accident law, encompassing the 
National Accident Helpline brand, Searches 
UK, Homeward Legal, Your Law, Law Together 
& National Conveyancing Partners. 

Over the last few years, Simon has been 
leading the division’s transformation strategy, 
including the successful launch of National 
Accident Law in April 2019. This has comprised 
transitioning from being a claims management 
company into a modern, technologically-
enabled law firm, with a market leading brand 
that is able to process its own enquiries. 

Previously, Simon spent 20 years in senior 
positions within the general insurance industry, 
most recently at Towergate Partnership Group, 
culminating in his roles as CEO of Towergate’s 
Direct Division & RKH Group.

Will Herbertson

Director of Marketing 
and Strategy – 
Consumer Legal Services 
Will joined the Group as Managing 
Director of the Group’s Residential 
Property division in September 
2018, before leading the successful merger of this 
area with the Personal Injury division during 2020. 

In his current role as Director of Marketing 
and Strategy, Will holds broad responsibility 
for brand-building, lead generation, market 
analysis, websites and customer journeys for 
the combined Consumer Legal Services division, 
and supports the divisional executive team and 
Group board with strategy development.

Will brings extensive commercial, marketing and 
digital leadership experience to the Group. Prior to 
joining the Group, Will was a Commercial Director at 
MoneySupermarket and held UK and international 
sales and marketing positions at Procter & Gamble, 
where he started his career.

Helen Jackson

Managing Director – 
Critical Care
Helen was appointed as 
Managing Director at Bush & Co 
in July 2016 having spent four 
years as Group HR Director.

Responsible for overall strategy and leadership 
within the division as well as business development, 
quality and clinical independence, Helen has 
driven a number of business improvements. More 
recently of note Helen led Bush in launching two 
industry leading ventures with the Spinal Injuries 
Association and Child Brain Injury Trust. These are 
both prominent charities in the sector, reinforcing 
the company’s market positioning as the leader 
in catastrophic injury in case management and 
building on Bush’s 30 years of success within the 
Critical Care sector.

Previously, Helen held HR leadership roles at 
Everest, BUPA and Tesco.

Marcus Lamont

Group HR Director
Marcus joined as Group HR 
Director in July 2016.

During his time with the 
Group, Marcus has embarked 
on delivering improvements 
to talent development, embedding the Group’s 
culture and Values and enhancing recruitment 
processes, with significant focus on an aligned 
approach across all divisions. Passionate about 
staff engagement and recognition, Marcus recently 
delivered Gold Standard Investors in People status 
for the Personal Injury division as well as ensured 
its inclusion for the first time in The Sunday Times 
Top 100 Best Small Companies to Work For.

Marcus joined from Everest where he was HR 
Director, taking the lead on talent management, 
leadership development, employee engagement 
and change management. Prior to that, Marcus 
held senior positions at UPS plc, across the globe.

Chair’s  
Introduction to  
Governance

Shareholder engagement
An important part of the QCA code concerns 
engagement and communication with our 
shareholders. We welcome open and regular 
dialogue with our shareholders and the Our 
Investors section of our website explains how we 
have sought to do this. 

In 2020, due to the restrictions put in place by the 
UK Government to limit the spread of COVID-19, 
we were forced to hold our Annual General Meeting 
as a closed meeting with the minimum number of 
shareholders present to form a quorum. Despite 
this, we sought to maintain engagement by 
encouraging shareholders to listen to the meeting 
via conference call and allowed them to submit 
questions, which were answered by the Directors 
during the meeting.

It is our hope that this year, in line with the 
Government’s roadmap to ease COVID-19 
restrictions, we will be permitted to return to a 
face-to-face AGM and I would like to extend an 
invitation to all shareholders to attend our AGM and 
to engage with the Board and other members of our 
senior leadership team who will be in attendance.

Tim Aspinall 
Chair

Dear Shareholder,

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to introduce 
our Corporate Governance statement for the 
year ended 31 December 2020. The purpose of 
this section of the annual report is to set out our 
commitment to good corporate governance, which 
should be read in conjunction with our website 
which provides further detail.

The Board is ultimately responsible for corporate 
governance, which is the way in which companies 
are directed and controlled. We believe that good 
corporate governance is vital to support long- 
term growth in shareholder value. To achieve 
this, companies require an efficient, effective 
and dynamic management framework that is 
accompanied by clear communication, promoting 
confidence and trust.

Compliance with the QCA 
Corporate Governance 
Code
Companies listed on AIM are required to adopt a 
recognised corporate governance code. The Board 
has adopted the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA) 
Corporate Governance Code. We believe that the 
QCA code is a pragmatic, principles-based tool that 
enhances the Group’s ability to explain its approach 
to corporate governance. It is appropriate for the 
needs and circumstances of small and mid-sized 
quoted companies on a public market. 

It is based around a set of ten principles to which 
the Group must either comply or explain why it has 
chosen not to. The ten principles of the code are 
set out in the table on page 63 and I can confirm 
that we are in compliance with the requirements 
of the code and the table provides signposts to the 
relevant disclosures and explanations.

58 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

59

 Governance  
Statement

The Board
Board composition
The Board comprises the Non-Executive Chair, 
three independent Non-Executive Directors and 
one Executive Director. Their biographies can be 
found on pages 56–57.

There is a clear separation of the roles of Non- 
Executive Chair and Executive Director. The Chair, 
Tim Aspinall, is responsible for the running of the 
Board and for ensuring that all Directors are fully 
informed of matters sufficient to make informed 
judgements. As Executive Director, James Saralis 
has responsibility for implementing the strategy 
agreed by the Board and managing the day-to-day 
operations of the Group. He is supported in this role 
by other senior leaders in the Group.

As Company Secretary, James Saralis, supports 
the Board with compliance and governance 
matters. The Board believes this is appropriate 
given the size and complexity of the Group and he 
reports directly to the Chair on governance matters 
and where any potential conflicts between the two 
roles arise.

The Board has determined that the Non-Executive 
Directors are independent, experienced and 
influential individuals with complementary skill 
sets. There is currently no Senior Independent 
Non-Executive Director. The Board believes 
this is appropriate give the size of the Board 
and will review this practice as part of the Board 
effectiveness review later in the year. 

Members of the Board maintain membership 
of a number of professional bodies and ensure 
their skill sets are constantly developed. As 
part of our ongoing commitment to staff 
development, Executive Directors and senior 
leaders have personal development programmes 
which include mentoring and attendance at 
high level leadership programmes. In addition, 
they receive individual support for specific 
and identified development needs to ensure 
they are kept up to date on relevant legal 
developments or changes in best practice.

The Nomination Committee is responsible for 
considering the make-up of the Board and identifies 
any succession planning requirements.

No individual or group dominates the Board’s 
decision-making processes.

The Role of the Board
The Board sets the strategic aims of the Group 
and its values; provides the leadership required to 
put them into effect; supervises and constructively 
challenges management, who are responsible for 
the day-to-day running of the Group; and reports 
to shareholders on their stewardship. The Board is 
also responsible for risk management, and we have 
set out our approach to this in the Principal Risks 
and Uncertainties section of the Annual Report on 
page 46.

Meetings were attended virtually from March 
2020 and the increase in the number of meetings 
compared to prior years was a direct result of the 
Group’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic as 
well as the aborted offer for the Group towards the 
end of 2020.

The Board met 16 times during 2020 and the 
meetings last for approximately half a day. In 
addition to this, all Directors attend the Group’s 
Annual General Meeting. Additional meetings 
or conference calls are convened as required. 
Members of the Board also chair and sit on the 
Board committees and these each have their own 
time commitments.

The following table shows the Directors’ attendance 
at Board and Committee meetings during the year:

Table of Board attendance

Tim Aspinall

Caroline Brown1

Russell Atkinson2

James Saralis

Gillian Kent

Sally Tilleray

Brian Phillips3

Board

16/16

11/11

10/10

16/16

16/16

16/16

7/7

Audit

Remuneration

Nomination

5/5

N/A

N/A

N/A

5/5

5/5

N/A

3/3

2/2

N/A

N/A

3/3

3/3

N/A

2/2

2/2

N/A

N/A

2/2

2/2

N/A

1. Caroline Brown resigned from the Board on 7 October 2020

2. Russell Atkinson resigned from the Board on 4 September 2020

3. Brian Phillips was appointed to the Board on 23 June 2020 

Board effectiveness
The Chair annually reviews the contributions 
of Board members, with a focus on ensuring 
effectiveness and relevance. The Board periodically 
reviews its effectiveness and performance as a 
unit to ensure that it is operating collectively in an 
efficient, informed, productive and open manner.

The Board last undertook an evaluation of its 
effectiveness in 2019 which was supervised by the 
Nomination Committee with the assistance of the 
Company Secretary. The approach taken was to 
issue a questionnaire, covering topics including 
Board composition and governance, Board 
operations, strategy, stakeholder relations and 
the performance of individual Directors and Board 
Committees. This was followed by a discussion with 
the full Board.

Internal control 
The Group has implemented policies on internal 
control and corporate governance. These have 
been prepared in order to ensure that:

   proper business records are maintained and 
reported on, which might reasonably affect the 
conduct of the business;

   monitoring procedures for the performance of 
the Group are presented to the Board at regular 
intervals;

   budget proposals are submitted to the Board 
no later than one month before the start of each 
financial year;

   accounting policies and practices suitable for the 
Group’s activities are followed in preparing the 
financial statements;

The key areas of focus and subsequent actions 
were presented in the Group’s financial statements 
for the financial year to 31 December 2019.

   the Group is provided with general accounting, 
administrative and secretarial services as may 
reasonably be required; and

The Board plans to conduct the next review into its 
effectiveness in the second half of 2021. The results 
of this review will be presented in the Group’s 
financial statements for the financial year to 31 
December 2021.

   interim and annual accounts are prepared and 
submitted in time to enable the Group to meet 
statutory filing deadlines. 

The Group continues to review its system of 
internal control to ensure compliance with best 
practice, whilst also having regard to its size and 
the resources available. The Board considers that 
the introduction of an internal audit function is not 

60 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

61

executives. The Remuneration Committee also has 
responsibility for:

   determining the total individual remuneration 
package of the Chair and each Executive Director 
(including bonuses, incentive payments and share 
options or other share awards); and

   determining the total individual remuneration 
package of the Company Secretary and all other 
senior executives (including bonuses, incentive 
payments and share options or other share 
awards), in each case within the terms of the 
Group’s policy and in consultation with the Chair 
of the Board and/or the Executive Director. 
No director or manager may be involved in any 
discussions as to their own remuneration.

Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee consists of: 

Gillian Kent (Chair)

Tim Aspinall 

Sally Tilleray

Brian Phillips

The Nomination Committee is expected to meet 
not less than once a year and at such other times 
as required. It has responsibility for reviewing the 
structure, size and composition (including the 
skills, knowledge and experience) of the Board, and 
giving full consideration to succession planning. 
It also has responsibility for recommending new 
appointments to the Board.

Accountability and 
stakeholders
The Board considers that the 2020 Annual 
Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, 
balanced and understandable and provides 
the information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Company’s position and 
performance, business model and strategy. 
Details of how we do this are also explained 
in the Audit & Risk Committee report.

appropriate at this juncture, although the Group 
finance team has implemented a series of internal 
control reviews and reports the outcomes of these 
to the Audit & Risk Committee.

Board committees
To assist in carrying out its duties the Board has 
set up a number of committees, including the Audit 
& Risk Committee, the Remuneration Committee 
and the Nomination Committee. Each committee 
has formally delegated duties and responsibilities 
with written terms of reference. From time to time 
separate committees may be set up by the Board 
to consider specific issues when the need arises. An 
explanation of the responsibilities and composition 
of the committees is set out below and the terms of 
reference can be downloaded from our website.

Audit & Risk Committee
The Audit & Risk Committee consists of: 

Sally Tilleray (Chair)

Gillian Kent

Brian Phillips

Tim Aspinall served on the Committee until his 
appointment to the role of Chair of the Board on 
7 October 2020. The Audit & Risk Committee 
is expected to meet formally at least three 
times a year and otherwise as required. It has 
responsibility for ensuring that the financial 
performance of the Group is properly reported 
on and reviewed, and its role includes monitoring 
the integrity of the financial statements of the 
Group (including annual and interim accounts 
and results announcements), reviewing internal 
control and risk management systems, reviewing 
any changes to accounting policies, reviewing and 
monitoring the extent of the non-audit services 
undertaken by external auditors and advising 
on the appointment of external auditors.

Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee consists of: 

Gillian Kent (Chair)

Tim Aspinall 

Sally Tilleray

Brian Phillips

The Remuneration Committee is expected to meet 
not less than twice a year and at such other times 
as required. The Remuneration Committee has 
responsibility for determining, within the agreed 
terms of reference, the Group’s policy on the 
remuneration packages of the Company’s Chair, 
the Executive and Non-Executive Directors, the 
Company Secretary and other senior

How we have complied with the  
QCA Corporate Governance Code

Deliver growth

Governance principles

Reference

1.  Establish a strategy and business model which 

promote long-term value for shareholders

Business Models (pages 9 and 12) and Our 
Businesses on pages 6–8 and pages 10–11

2.  Seek to understand and meet shareholder needs 

See Chair’s Introduction to Governance (page 59)

and expectations

3.  Take into account wider stakeholder and social 
responsibilities and their implications for long- 
term success

4.  Embed effective risk management, considering 
both opportunities and threats, throughout the 
organisation

Maintain a dynamic management framework

See Section 172 Statement (page 52) 

See Principal Risks and Uncertainties (page 46)

Governance principles

Reference

5.  Maintain the Board as a well-functioning, 

See Governance Statement (page 60)

balanced team led by the Chair

6.  Ensure that between them the directors have 

See Governance Statement (page 60)

the necessary up-to-date experience, skills and 
capabilities

7.  Evaluate Board performance based on clear 
and relevant objectives, seeking continuous 
improvement

See Governance Statement (page 60)

8.  Promote a corporate culture that is based on 

See Our Culture, Our Business (pages 18–22)

ethical values and behaviours

9.  Maintain governance structures and processes 

See Governance Statement (page 60)

that are fit for purpose and support good 
decision-making by the Board

Build trust

Governance principles

Reference

10.  Communicate how the company is governed 
and is performing by maintaining a dialogue 
with shareholders and other relevant 
stakeholders

See Governance Statement (page 60) and Section 
172 Statement (page 52)

62 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

63

Audit and  
Risk Committee  
Report

Dear Shareholder,

I am pleased to present my report of the Audit & 
Risk Committee for the year ended 31 December 
2020. 

The composition and responsibilities of the 
Committee are set out on page 62. The Chair, 
Chief Financial Officer, Group Financial Controller 
and external auditors attend the Committee by 
invitation, if required.

The main items of business considered by the 
Committee during the year included:

Appointment of the 
external auditor
The Committee considers a number of areas when 
reviewing the engagement of the external auditor, 
namely their performance in discharging the audit, 
the scope of the audit and terms of engagement, 
their independence and objectivity, and 
remuneration. Whilst the Committee was satisfied 
with the performance of PricewaterhouseCoopers 
(PwC) and its audit of the financial statements 
for the year ended 31 December 2019, following a 
review of PwC’s proposals for this year’s audit, the 
Committee concluded that the proposal did not 
represent value for money for the Company.

Accordingly, the Committee launched a 
competitive tender process which concluded 
with Mazars LLP (Mazars) being appointed as the 
Group’s new external auditor for the year ended 31 
December 2020. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP resigned by notice to 
the Company under section 516 of the Companies 
Act 2006 and has confirmed that there were no 
matters connected with it ceasing to hold office that 
need to be brought to the attention of members 
or creditors of the Group for the purposes of 
section 519 of the Companies Act 2006.

Following the completion of this year’s audit, the 
Committee has confirmed it is satisfied with the 
independence, objectivity and effectiveness of 
Mazars and has recommended to the Board that 
the auditors be reappointed, and there will be a 
resolution to this effect at the forthcoming Annual 
General Meeting.

External audit process
The external auditor prepared a plan for its audit of 
the full year financial statements, which, this year, 
was presented to the Committee in March 2021. 
This was later than the normal timescales due to 
the aborted takeover offer of the Group by Frenkel 
Topping Group plc. The audit plan set out the scope 
of the audit, areas of significant risk for the external 
auditor to focus their work on and audit timetable. 
This plan was reviewed and agreed in advance by 
the Audit & Risk Committee.

Following its review, the external auditor presented 
its findings to the Audit & Risk Committee for 
discussion. No major areas of concern were 
highlighted by the external auditor during the year; 
however, areas of significant risk and other matters 
of audit relevance were discussed.

The Committee monitors the provision of non-audit 
services by the external auditor. The breakdown 
of fees between audit and non-audit services is 
provided in note 3 to the financial statements. 
The non-audit fees relate to a regulatory audit of 
compliance with the Solicitors Accounting Rules in 
National Accident Law. 

Changes to financial 
reporting disclosures
During the year, the Directors, in conjunction with 
the Group’s new external auditors, undertook a 
review of NAHL’s financial reporting disclosures.  
As a result of this assessment, the Directors 
have simplified the presentation of the income 
statement and amended the classification of 
certain costs along with the definition of certain 
alterative performance measures (APMs). In 
addition, the Directors have determined that the 
presentation of the non-controlling members’ 
interests in the profits of the Group’s ABS law firms 
should be amended in the financial statements and, 
as required by IAS 8, the Group has restated the 
2019 comparatives to be consistent with this new 
presentation.  

The impact of these changes on the 2019 results is 
as follows:

Adjustment 1 – Following the restructure of the 
Group during the year, costs relating to the Group’s 
call centre and lead triage operations have been 
reclassified from administrative expenses to cost 
of sales. This ensures consistency between the 
Group’s Personal Injury and Residential Property 
businesses.  There is no change to the underlying 
operating profit of Consumer Legal Services as a 
result of this change.

Adjustment 2 – In line with best practice, the 
Group has presented the costs of share-based 
payments and amortisation of intangible assets 
arising on business combinations within underlying 
operating profit rather than as non-underlying 
items. The Directors consider that this change will 
result in greater comparability of the Group results 
with other listed entities.

Adjustment 3 – Following a detailed review of 
the LLP agreements in respect of the Group’s 
joint-venture law firms, and in consultation with 
the Group’s new auditors, the Directors have 
determined that the non-controlling member 
capital and current accounts previously accounted 
for as equity in the consolidated statement of 
financial position, meets the definition of a financial 
liability under IAS32 and should be presented as 
such. There is no change to the capital and reserves 
attributable to the owners of the Company.

As a result, the profit attributable to non-controlling 
interests has now been reclassified as an expense 
in the statement of comprehensive income rather 
than shown as an allocation of profits to a non-
controlling interest. This is in line with treatment 
of income and returns on financial liabilities under 
IAS 32. There is no change to the profit and total 
comprehensive income attributable to the owners 
of the Company.

The Directors believe that these changes to 
presentation better reflect the nature of the costs 
and the operations of the respective businesses. 

Further details are presented in note 30.

Critical accounting 
judgements and key 
sources of estimation 
uncertainty
The critical accounting judgements considered 
by the Committee during the year are set out in 
note 1 to the financial statements on page 99. In 
consideration of these judgements, the Committee 
reviewed the recommendations of the finance 
function and received reports from the external 
auditors on their findings. These judgements 
comprised the following:

   The decision to consolidate the results and 
net assets of two Limited Liability Partnership 
(LLP) law firms in the financial statements. The 
Committee considers that Your Law LLP and Law 
Together LLP are controlled through the Group’s 
100% subsidiary, Project Jupiter Limited, who is 
entitled to appoint the majority of members to 
the management boards. Therefore, the Group is 

64 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

65

correct in consolidating these entities within the 
financial statements with a corresponding liability 
recognised for our partner firms’ share of profit.

   The classification and disclosure of exceptional 
items. In order to provide additional useful 
information for shareholders on underlying 
business trends and core trading performance, 
the Board uses alternative performance measures 
and classifies certain items of expenditure as 
exceptional items. The classification of such 
items involves judgement as to what is meant 
by exceptional and the Board has therefore 
developed an accounting policy for such items 
(see note 1 on page 108). Given that this a 
presentational judgement which does not affect 
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income 
and expenses, the Committee has determined 
that is does not warrant disclosure in note 1 as a 
critical accounting judgement.

The Committee has also considered the key 
sources of estimation uncertainty set out in note 
1 to the financial statements on page 99, which 
comprises the following:

   The revenue recognition on provision of legal 
services. The Group recognises revenue in its 
ABS law firms using the expected value method 
provided by IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with 
Customers. There is uncertainty in determining 
the transaction price, which is dependent on the 
stage at which a claim settles and the quantum 
of final damages, but management use historical 
experience and average fee history in order to 
calculate an estimated price. The estimate is 
revised as the claim progresses and assumptions 
are updated to reflect actual experience. The 
Committee considers that management adopt 
a conservative approach to recognition as no 
revenue is recognised until liability is admitted 
on a claim and, as a result, there is less risk of 
significant revenue write-offs in future.

   Recoverability of trade receivables. The Group 
recognises trade receivables and accrued income 
in the financial statements net of an estimated 
provision for impairment losses. This has 
been calculated using an expected credit loss 
methodology, in line with the guidance in IFRS 
9 Financial Instruments, along with individual 
provisions for balances where management has 
specific concerns. The Committee has reviewed 
the basis for the calculation of the provision and 
the underlying assumptions (explained in note 1 

on page 100), and is satisfied that the provision is 
appropriately valued.

   Impairment of goodwill and parent company 
investment. Management conducted a review of 
the carrying value of goodwill in the consolidated 
financial statements to determine whether there 
was any requirement for an impairment charge, 
in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. 
This was an area of focus for the Committee given 
the size of the balance and the results in the year. 
Having reviewed the assumptions used in the 
calculation of carrying value, and the sensitivity 
analysis performed, the Committee was satisfied 
that sufficient headroom to the carrying value 
existed. Accordingly, the Committee concluded 
that this did not warrant disclosure under the key 
estimates in note 1.

In summary, the Committee is satisfied that the 
judgements and estimates made by management 
are appropriate.

Going Concern
The Audit & Risk Committee has reviewed 
the Going Concern assessment prepared by 
management. The assessment includes detailed 
financial forecasts covering a range of potential 
scenarios that account for the impact of COVID-19 
on the business. The going concern assessment 
focuses on two key areas, being the ability of the 
Group to meet its debts as they fall due and being 
able to operate within its banking facility.

The Group has access to a £25.0m revolving credit 
facility (RCF) with its bankers and at the time of 
writing, it has drawn £19.0m of this facility and has 
cash of £3.5m. In all of the scenarios the Group has 
modelled it would have sufficient liquidity within its 
current RCF to meet its liabilities as they fall due 
and would not need to access additional funding.

The Group’s RCF is subject to quarterly covenant 
testing and all of the scenarios modelled suggest 
that the Group will continue to operate within its 
covenants for the foreseeable future. 

The Group has modelled a worst case scenario, 
assuming that volumes fall back to their 2020 
levels, and has then considered the options it would 
have available to mitigate against any shortfall in 
profits and cash. Under this scenario, the Group 
would be able to implement sufficient mitigating 
actions in order to operate within its covenants. The 
likelihood of this scenario occurring is considered 

view of the current size and nature of the Group’s 
businesses, this approach is sufficient to enable 
the Committee to derive sufficient assurance as to 
the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls 
and risk management procedures without a formal 
internal audit function. This will be kept under 
review as the business evolves.

Sally Tilleray 
Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee

to be remote and therefore the directors consider 
the Going Concern basis of accounting to be 
appropriate.

The directors have also considered the ability of 
the Group to  refinance, given the loan term expires 
on 31 December 2022, and are confident that the 
Group will be able to secure future funding.

Further details of the going concern review are 
given on page 98. Based on this review, the 
Committee  has a reasonable expectation that the 
Company and Group has adequate resources to 
continue in existence for the foreseeable future and 
has concluded it is appropriate to adopt the going 
concern basis of accounting in the preparation of 
the financial statements.

New and forthcoming 
accounting standards
There were no new accounting standards during 
the year.

Risk Management 
Framework and controls
The Audit & Risk Committee provides support 
to the Board in its oversight of the Group’s risk 
management framework, as set out on page 48 
and monitors the effectiveness of risk management 
through reporting and assurance. 

During the year, the Committee commissioned a 
review into cyber-security risks across the Group 
in response to increased levels of fraud in the 
legal industry and potential emerging risks arising 
from the Group’s decision to ask its employees 
to work from home during the periods of national 
lockdown. The review was conducted by the Group 
Legal & Compliance Director and the IT Director 
and recommended a number of improvements to 
processes and implemented enhanced training to 
mitigate the risks. 

The Committee reviewed the output of the 
cyber-security review along with the wider risk 
management framework and is satisfied that 
appropriate mitigating controls are in place. 

At present the Group does not have an internal 
audit function, but the finance function conducts 
a programme of review of the financial controls 
operating within each of the businesses, identifying 
areas to be improved and reporting the outcomes 
to the Committee. The Committee believes that in 

66 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

67

Remuneration  
Committee  
Report

Dear Shareholder,

On behalf of my colleagues on the Remuneration 
Committee and the Board, I am pleased to present 
the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the 
financial year ended 31 December 2020, which 
sets out the future Directors’ Remuneration Policy, 
intended to take effect from the close of the 2021 
Annual General Meeting and the Annual Report on 
Remuneration.

Review of the 2020 
financial year
2020 presented challenges to the business through 
continued regulatory uncertainty and the COVID-19 
global pandemic. The pandemic restrictions had 
the effect of reducing volumes in our Personal 
Injury and Critical Care divisions contributing to a 
decline in Group revenue of 20.3% to £40.9m and 
in underlying profit of 45.7% to £5.7m. 

The Company accessed the Government’s 
Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme from April to 
December and focused on cost saving measures 
throughout the year resulting in annualised savings 
of £1.2m. Investment into the business was 
targeted at essential capabilities and key strategic 
initiatives and proactive steps were taken to 
manage the Group’s balance sheet and maximise 
liquidity, resulting in a year end net debt of £16.3m 
(2019: £21.0m). 

The Company was also the target of a reverse 
takeover bid which involved extensive discussions 
from September 2020 until they were drawn to a 
close in January 2021 when an offer was not made. 

The above informed and shaped the decisions 
of the Committee during the year and in the 
construction of the new Remuneration Policy.

New 2021 Remuneration Policy
Our previous Directors’ Remuneration Policy 
was approved by an advisory vote at the 
2018 Annual General Meeting and became 
effective for three years from the close of 
that meeting. The Committee has taken 
the opportunity to review the executive 
remuneration framework to ensure that it:

   retains and motivates our Executive Directors and 
wider management in order to provide the Group 
with continuity and stability at the leadership level 

   is simple and transparent

   takes into account market practice, shareholder 
expectations and best practice governance 
developments for AIM companies

Following consultation with major shareholders,  
the following key changes have been agreed by  
the Committee.

Restricted Share Plan (RSP)
The Committee agreed to replace the current 
Performance Share Plan (PSP) with annual awards 
of restricted shares. The Committee believes this 
is the right approach for the Group as it provides 
a simple retention and lock-in mechanism for our 
CFO and wider management at a time when it is 
critical to sustain a stable leadership team who 
are focused on delivering the Group’s strategic 
priorities and value to shareholders, especially 
during an uncertain environment with factors 
outside of the leadership team’s control, which 
has been a key challenge for the Committee in 
setting robust long-term targets when granting PSP 
awards in recent years.

The design terms are:

   Reduction in maximum award from 100% 
of salary under the PSP to 50% of salary in 
respect of a financial year under the RSP. This 
50% reduction is in line with guidance from 
shareholders and proxy voting agencies. 

   Three-year vesting period, subject to continued 
employment and the Committee’s assessment of 
overall business performance during the vesting 
period (taking into account financial and share 
price performance), with a two year clawback in 
the event of material misstatement of the Group’s 
financial results or if the participant has been 
guilty of serious misconduct. 

   Awards will ordinarily be pro-rated for time served 
in the event of a change of control, unless the 
Committee determination, at its discretion, that 
circumstances exist to disapply time pro-rating.

Other policy changes
   Alignment of Executive Director employer 
pension contribution (or cash allowance) with the 
wider workforce (currently 3% of salary), from a 
previous contribution of up to 10% of salary.

   Flexibility to pay a transformation transaction 
bonus to Executive Directors in addition to 
the regular performance based bonus. The 
transaction bonus is capped at 100% of 
salary and will be determined at the discretion 
of the Committee taking into account the 
value generated for shareholders and the 
Executive Director’s contribution to delivering 

the transaction. There are no changes to the 
maximum opportunity of the regular performance 
based bonus of up to 100% of salary in respect of 
a financial year.

   A reduction of the notice period of the CEO role 
from 9 months to 6 months in line with the CFO 
role. 

The full 2021 Remuneration Policy is found on  
page 75.

Remuneration decisions in 
respect of 2020
Board changes
On 7th September 2020, Russell Atkinson resigned 
from the Board as CEO and left the Group on 30th 
September 2020. He was paid 9 months’ salary, 
benefits and pension in lieu of notice in line with his 
contractual entitlements. He was treated as a ‘good 
leaver’ for the purpose of the 2020 annual bonus 
plan and for long-term incentive awards granted on 
25th May 2018 and 18th April 2019, dependent on 
the achievement of the performance conditions. 
As noted below, no 2020 bonus was ultimately 
payable to Russell Atkinson and his long-term 
incentive awards granted on 25th May 2018 lapsed 
in full as the threshold performance targets were 
not achieved.

On 8th October 2020, Tim Aspinall was appointed 
as Non-Executive Chair of the Group following the 
immediate resignation of Caroline Brown from this 
position. His fee was set at £80,000 per annum in 
line with his predecessor’s fee. 

Salary/Fees
It was proposed that the Executive Directors and 
Non-Executive Directors would receive a 2% 
increase to base salary and fees with effect from 1 
March 2020, in line with the percentage increase 
awarded to the wider workforce. However, in 
response to the impact of COVID-19, this increase 
was deferred and a decision was made not to apply 
it in the year. Furthermore, the Board agreed to a 
20% reduction in base salaries and fees for three 
months (1 April to 30 June 2020) as part of the 
cost-saving measures implemented in light of 
COVID-19. 

68 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

69

Annual bonus outcomes 
The 2020 annual bonus was assessed against 
underlying operating profit less profit attributable 
to members’ non-controlling interests in LLPs. 
(75% of the award) and individual objectives (25% 
of the award). The threshold operating profit target 
was not achieved and therefore the Executive 
Directors were not eligible for a bonus payment.

Long-term incentives
On 25th May 2018, Russell Atkinson was granted 
152,498 shares and James Saralis 91,463 shares in 
the form of nominal cost share options which were 
subject to EPS performance (50% of the award) 
and absolute Total Shareholder Return (TSR) 
performance (50% of award). The options have 
now lapsed in full as the threshold performance 
targets were not achieved.

No long-term incentive awards were granted to 
Executive Directors during 2020. This was a result 
of the Committee initially delaying the grant of 
awards due to the impact of COVID-19 and then 
subsequently the Group being subject to an offer 
during the latter part of the year.

Implementation of 
Directors’ Remuneration 
Policy for 2021
Salary/Fees
The CFO was awarded a 20% temporary increase 
in base salary from £170,000 to £204,000 per 
annum, with effect from 1 March 2021 in recognition 
of the additional responsibility involved in his role 
in the absence of a Group CEO. For reference 
Russell Atkinson’s base salary was set at £227,800 
per annum prior to his resignation as CEO.

A proposed 2% increase in salary for the wider 
workforce has been deferred in response to the 
impact of COVID-19, and will be reviewed later on in 
the year.

A proposed 2% increase in Non-Executive 
Directors’ basic fee and the Chair’s fee has been 
deferred in response to the impact of COVID-19 and 
will be reviewed later in the year.

Annual bonus plan
The CFO’s annual bonus opportunity is 
capped at 45% of salary which is subject to 
stretching operating profit (post minority 
interest) targets for 2021. For reference the 
normal maximum bonus opportunity is 100% 
of salary under the Remuneration Policy. 
The performance targets are considered 
commercially sensitive and will be disclosed in 
next year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.

Long-term incentives
A restricted share award was granted to the CFO on 
23 April 2021 which comprised of two tranches:

   an award equal to 50% of his 2020 salary which 
will vest on the second anniversary of the grant 
date subject to continued employment and a 
business performance underpin.

   an award equal to 50% of his 2021 salary which 
will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date 
subject to continued employment and a business 
performance underpin.

This one-off award structure reflects that no long-
term incentive award was granted in 2020.

While the Company’s AGM is currently scheduled 
for June 2021, technically, the restricted share 
award was granted under the 2018 Remuneration 
Policy. The Committee considered there to be 
sufficient flexibility to grant restricted share awards 
under such policy. 

Conclusion
We are committed to a responsible and transparent 
approach in respect of executive pay. The 
Committee believes that the advisory vote provides 
accountability and gives shareholders a say on 
this important area of corporate governance. 
We continue to welcome any feedback from 
shareholders and hope to receive your support at 
the 2021 AGM. 

Gillian Kent 
Chair of the Remuneration Committee 
4 June 2021

Single figure of remuneration (audited)
The table below details the elements of remuneration receivable by each Director for the financial year 
ended 31 December 2020 and the total remuneration receivable by each Director for that financial year and 
for the financial year ended 31 December 2019.

Salary 
and 
fees5 Benefits

Termination 

benefits Pension

Annual 
bonus

Total 
Remuneration 
2020

Total 
Remuneration 
2019

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Executive Directors

J R Atkinson1

J D Saralis

Non-Executive Directors

C A Brown2

T J M Aspinall3

G D C Kent

B Phillips4

S P Tilleray

159

162

62

58

47

23

48

13

16

–

–

–

–

–

179

–

–

–

–

–

–

2

2

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

353

180

62

58

47

23

48

246

185

84

55

50

–

22

1. J R Atkinson resigned from the Board as CEO on 7th September 2020

2. C A Brown resigned from the Board as Non-Executive Chair on 8th October 2020 

3. T J M Aspinall was appointed Senior Independent Director on 30th January 2020 with an additional fee of £5,000 per annum in light of the additional responsibility and 
was appointed Non-Executive Chair on 8th October following the resignation of C A Brown with a fee of £80,000 per annum

4. B Phillips was appointed as a Non-Executive Director on 25th June 2020

5. The Board agreed to a 20% reduction in base salaries and fees for three months (1 April to 30 June 2020) as part of the cost-saving measures implemented in light of 
COVID-19. The salaries and fees above are shown after the reduction. 

The taxable benefits received during the financial year ended 31 December 2020 are principally car 
allowance and private medical insurance.

Individual elements of remuneration
Base salary and fees
The base salaries for 2020 and 2021 are as set out below:

J D Saralis1 

2020 
base salary 
£000 
170 

2021  
base salary1 
£000 
204 

% increase
20%

1. As noted on page 70, J D Saralis has been awarded a temporary increase in base salary from 1st March 2021 in recognition of his additional responsibilities.

Details of Non-Executive Directors’ fees for 2020 and 2021 are as set out below: 

Chair’s fee 

Non-Executive Director’s fee 

Senior Independent Director 

Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee 

Chair of the Remuneration Committee 

2020 
fee 
£000 
80 

45 

5 

5 

5 

2021 
fee 
£000 
80 

45 

5 

5 

5 

% increase
0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

70 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Annual bonus plan
The maximum annual bonus opportunity for the CEO was 100% of salary and for the CFO was 80% of salary 
in respect of the year ended 31 December 2020. 75% of the annual bonus was assessed against underlying 
operating profit performance (after profit attributable to non-controlling members’ interests in LLPs) and 
25% was assessed against individual objectives. 

The threshold operating profit target was not achieved and therefore the CEO and CFO were not eligible for 
a bonus payment.

The following table sets out the bonus criteria for the CEO and CFO and how this reflects performance for 
the year.

CEO J R Atkinson

Performance measure 

Operating profit1 

Proportion of bonus 
determined by measure 

Performance 

Bonus earned 
£000

75%  Operating profit threshold of £8.7m 
was not achieved.

– 

– 

Personal objectives2 

25% 

These included the strategic 
development of the Group, 
divisional strategy support 
including the re-engineering of  
the Personal Injury division, and  
strategy and operational  
planning in Residential  
Property and strategy  
development of  
Critical Care, Investor 
relations and personal 
leadership development 

CFO J D Saralis

Performance measure 

Operating profit1 

Personal objectives2 

Proportion of bonus 
determined by measure 

75% 

25% 

Bonus earned 
£000

– 

– 

Performance 

Operating profit threshold 
of £8.7m was not achieved.

These included supporting  
development of the divisional  
strategies, including the  
re-engineering of the Personal  
Injury business, investor relations  
and supporting Residential Property  
and Critical Care in the  
delivery of their plans.

1. Operating profit is defined as underlying operating profit less profit attributable to non-controlling members’ interests in LLPs.

2. No bonus was payable against the individual element as the operating profit threshold was not achieved.

Long-term incentives
On 25th May 2018, J R Atkinson was granted 152,498 shares and J D Saralis 91,463 shares in the form of 
nominal cost share options which were subject to EPS performance (50% of the award) and absolute TSR 
performance (50% of award). 

The options lapsed in full as the threshold performance targets were not achieved as illustrated below.

EPS for the year ending 31 December 2020 

Vesting2 (% maximum) 

Less than 17.1p 

17.1p 

18.7p 

19.6p 

Actual 

Vesting 

TSR1 

Less than 201p 

201p 

234p 

Actual 

Vesting 

0%

50%

80%

100%

(0.5)p

0%

Vesting2 (% maximum)

0%

25%

100%

57p

0%

1. TSR defined as the average mid-market closing share price for the month to 24 May 2021 plus total dividends declared between the grant date 
and 24 May 2021.

2. Vesting percentages accrue on a straight-line basis between 50% – 100% and 25% – 100%.

No long-term incentive awards were granted during the year ended 31 December 2020.

Statement of Directors’ shareholding and share 
interests
The interests of the Directors and their immediate families in the Company’s Ordinary Shares as at 31 
December 2020 (or the date of resignation from the Board if earlier) and as at 31 December 2019 were as 
follows:

Executive Directors 
J R Atkinson1 

J D Saralis 

Non-Executive Directors 
C A Brown2 

T J M Aspinall 

G D C Kent 

B Phillips 

S P Tilleray 

1. J R Atkinson resigned from the Board as CEO on 7th September 2020 
2. C A Brown resigned from the Board as Non-Executive Chair on 8th October 2020 

31 December 
2020 

31 December
2019

0.84% 

0.1% 

0.00% 

0.02% 

0.00% 

0.00% 

0.00% 

1.15%

0.06%

0.00%

0.02%

0.00%

n/a

0.00%

72 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The interests of each Executive Director of the Company as at 31 December 2020 in the Company’s share 
schemes were as follows:

Director 

Plan 

Vested but  Unvested and  Unvested and 
subject to  not subject to 

Exercised  unexercised 
during the 
year 

during the  performance 
measures 

year 

Total as at
performance  31 December
2020

measures 

J R Atkinson 

LTIP (nominal cost options)  – 

– 

185,175 

EMI 

SAYE 

– 

– 

J D Saralis 

LTIP (nominal cost options)  – 

EMI (nominal cost options)  – 

SAYE 

– 

124,999 

– 

 – 

– 

– 

– 

– 

 – 

 110,568 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

185,175

124,999

–

–

110,568

10,514

– 

10,514 

Consideration by the 
Directors of matters 
relating to Directors’ 
remuneration
During the year ended 31 December 2020, the 
Committee was composed of the Company’s 
independent Non-Executive Directors, Gillian Kent 
(Chair), Tim Aspinall, Caroline Brown (resigned 8th 
October 2020) and Sally Tilleray. Brian Phillips was 
appointed to the Committee on the 25th January 
2021.

Executive Directors only attend meetings by 
invitation.

The Committee’s key responsibilities are:

   reviewing the ongoing appropriateness and 
relevance of remuneration policy including a new 
three year policy for 2021;

   reviewing and approving the remuneration 
packages of the Executive Directors;

   the grant of 2021 restricted share awards for 
Executive Directors and senior management and 
the outturn of prior long-term incentive awards;

   monitoring the level and structure of 
remuneration of the senior management; and

   production of the Annual Report on the Directors’ 
remuneration.

Advisors
During the year ended 31 December 2020, the 
Committee received independent advice from 
Deloitte LLP. Deloitte is a founder member of the 
Remuneration Consultants Group and voluntarily 
operates under its code of conduct in its dealings 
with the Committee.

Director Remuneration 
Report voting at the 2020 
AGM
The table below sets out the voting outcome 
at the Group’s AGM held on 25 June 2020 in 
respect of the resolution to approve the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report contained in the Group’s 
2019 Annual Report and Accounts.

Votes for

% for Votes against

% against

Total votes 
cast

Votes 
withheld 
(abstentions)

26,257,048

97.42

694,903

2.58%

26,951,951

–

Approval of 
Directors’ 
Remuneration 
report

Directors’  
Remuneration  
Policy

This section sets out the Company’s Directors’ Remuneration Policy, which will apply from the date of the 
2021 Annual General Meeting. The Policy is determined by the Committee of the Company.

Policy table for Executive Directors

Operation

Maximum opportunity

Component

Base salary

Purpose and 
link to strategy

Core element 
of fixed 
remuneration 
to provide a 
competitive 
base salary 
for the market 
in which the 
Company 
operates 
to attract 
and retain 
Executive 
Directors of a 
suitable calibre.

Salaries are reviewed 
annually taking into 
account:
   underlying Group 
performance;
   role, experience and 
individual performance; 
   competitive salary levels 
and market forces; and
   pay and conditions 
elsewhere in the Group.

Benefits

To provide 
a market 
competitive 
benefits 
package as 
part of total 
remuneration.

Executive Directors receive 
benefits in line with market 
practice, and these include 
principally life insurance, 
private medical insurance 
and a car allowance.

Other benefits may 
be provided based on 
individual circumstances.

Performance 
metrics

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Although there is no 
overall maximum, salary 
increases are normally 
reviewed in the context 
of the salary increases 
across the wider Group. 
The Committee may 
award salary increases 
above this level to take 
account of individual 
circumstances such as: 
   Increase in scope and 
responsibility; 
   Increase to reflect the 
Executive Director’s 
development and 
performance in the 
role; or
   Alignment to market 
level. 

Whilst the Committee 
has not set an absolute 
maximum on the level 
of benefits Executive 
Directors receive, the 
value of the benefit 
is at a level which the 
Committee considers 
appropriate against the 
market and provides 
sufficient level of benefit 
based on individual 
circumstances. 

74 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Component

Retirement 
benefits

Purpose and 
link to strategy

To provide an 
appropriate 
level of 
retirement 
benefit.

SAYE Plan

Annual 
bonus 

Promote share 
ownership 
and provide 
alignment with 
shareholders’ 
interests.

Rewards 
performance 
against annual 
targets which 
support the 
strategic 
direction of the 
Company.

Operation

Maximum opportunity

Executive Directors are 
eligible to participate in 
the Company’s defined 
contribution pension 
plan (or receive a cash 
allowance equivalent).

Executive Directors are 
entitled to participate in 
a HMRC tax qualifying all 
employee SAYE Plan.

The maximum employer 
pension contribution 
(or cash allowance 
equivalent) is aligned 
with the level available 
to the majority of 
the wider workforce 
(currently 3% of salary). 

Participation limits are 
those set by the UK tax 
authorities.

Awards are based on 
annual performance 
against key financial 
targets and/or the delivery 
of strategic/personal 
objectives.

The normal maximum 
annual bonus 
opportunity is up to 
100% of base salary in 
respect of a financial 
year.

The Committee has 
discretion to amend 
the pay-out should any 
formulaic output not 
reflect the Committee’s 
assessment of overall 
business performance.

For up to two years 
following the determination 
of a bonus pay-out the 
Committee has the right to 
recover some or all of the 
bonus pay-out in the event 
of a material misstatement 
of the Group’s financial 
results or if the participant 
has been guilty of gross 
misconduct. 

An additional bonus 
opportunity of up to 
100% of base salary 
may be awarded 
in the event of a 
transformational 
transaction. Such bonus 
will be determined 
at the discretion 
of the Committee 
taking into account 
the value generated 
for shareholders 
and the Executive 
Director’s contribution 
to delivering the 
transaction.

Performance 
metrics

Not applicable.

Not subject to 
performance 
metrics in line 
with HMRC 
practice.

Targets are 
set annually 
reflecting the 
Company’s 
strategy and 
aligned with 
key financial, 
strategic and/or 
individual targets. 

At least 50% 
of the bonus 
is assessed 
against financial 
performance 
metrics of the 
business and the 
balance is based 
on strategic/
personal 
objectives. 

Stretching 
targets are 
required for 
maximum pay-
out.

Component

Restricted 
share 
awards 

Purpose and 
link to strategy

Support 
retention, 
promote share 
ownership 
and provide 
alignment with 
shareholders’ 
interests

Performance 
metrics

Although no 
performance 
metrics will apply 
to restricted 
share awards, the 
Committee will 
have discretion 
to amend the 
vesting outcome 
should the 
amount vesting 
not reflect the 
Committee’s 
assessment of 
overall business 
performance

Operation

Maximum opportunity

The normal maximum 
restricted share award 
opportunity is up to 
50% of base salary in 
respect of a financial 
year. 

Under the LTIP and EMI 
Plan rules the overall 
combined maximum 
award that may be 
granted in respect of a 
financial year is 300% 
of base salary. Awards 
above 50% of base 
salary would only be 
granted in exceptional 
circumstances and 
would be subject to 
performance metrics. 

The Group operates a 
nominal cost LTIP and 
Enterprise Management 
Incentive (EMI) Plan, 
collectively the ‘LTIP 
schemes’.

Under the nominal cost 
LTIP, awards may be 
granted in the form of 
nil or nominal cost share 
options, or contingent 
rights to receive shares.

Under the EMI Plan, 
awards may be granted 
in the form tax qualifying 
share options or non-tax 
qualifying share options.

Awards will be granted with 
vesting subject, ordinarily, 
to continued employment, 
normally over at least a 
three year period. 

The Committee may 
reduce an unvested award 
in the event of a material 
misstatement of the 
Group’s financial results or 
if the participant has been 
guilty of gross misconduct.

For up to two years 
following the determination 
of the vesting outcome of 
an award, the Committee 
has the right to cancel 
the award if it has not 
been exercised, or require 
repayment of some or all 
of the award in the event 
of a material misstatement 
of the Group’s financial 
results or if the participant 
has been guilty of gross 
misconduct.

76 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

77

Payments for loss of office
The principles on which the determination of payments for loss of office will be approached are set out 
below:

Payment in lieu of 
notice

Annual bonus

Share awards

Policy

In line with the provisions of the Executive Directors’ service contracts.

At the discretion of the Committee dependent upon the circumstances of departure 
and contribution to the business during the bonus period.

The extent to which any unvested award will vest will be determined in accordance 
with the rules of the LTIP and EMI Plan. Unvested awards will normally lapse on 
cessation of employment, other than when the individual is considered to be a “good 
leaver”.

Other payments

In appropriate circumstances, payments may also be made in respect of accrued 
holiday, outplacement, legal fees and under the terms of the SAYE Plan.

Statement of consideration of shareholder views
The Committee considers shareholder feedback received on remuneration matters, including issues 
arising in relation to the AGM, as well as any additional comments received during any other meetings with 
shareholders. The Committee will seek to engage directly with major shareholders and their representative 
bodies should any material changes be made to the Directors’ Remuneration Policy.

Non-Executive Directors

Purpose and link to 
strategy

Sole element of Non-
Executive Director 
remuneration, set at 
a level that reflects 
market conditions 
and is sufficient to 
attract individuals with 
appropriate knowledge 
and experience.

Approach of the Company

Fees are normally reviewed annually.

Fees paid to Non-Executive Directors for their services are approved by 
the Committee. Fees may include a basic fee and additional fees for further 
responsibilities (for example, chairmanship of Board committees). 

Non-Executive Directors do not participate in any of the Company’s 
share options schemes or annual bonus scheme nor do they 
receive any pension contributions. Non-Executive Directors may be 
eligible to receive benefits such as the use of secretarial support, 
travel costs or other benefits that may be appropriate.

Actual fee levels are disclosed in the Annual Report on Remuneration for the 
relevant financial year. 

Explanation of 
performance metrics 
chosen
The performance metrics under the annual bonus 
will be selected annually to reflect the Group’s 
key financial and strategic priorities for the year. 
Stretching performance targets are set, taking into 
account a number of different reference points, 
which may include the Group’s business plans 
and strategy and the economic environment. Full 
pay-out will only occur for what the Committee 
considers to be stretching performance.

The Committee retains the ability to adjust or set 
different performance targets if events occur which 
cause the Committee to determine that the targets 
are no longer appropriate and that amendment is 
required so that they achieve their original purpose.

Awards and options may be adjusted in the event of 
a variation of share capital in accordance with the 
rules of the LTIP and EMI Plan.

Name 

J Saralis 

T J M Aspinall 

G D C Kent 

B Phillips 

S P Tilleray 

Policy for the 
remuneration of 
employees more generally
Remuneration arrangements are determined 
throughout the Group based on the same principle 
that reward should be achieved for delivery of 
the business strategy and should be sufficient to 
attract, retain and motivate high-calibre employees. 
The Company operates a HMRC tax qualifying 
SAYE Plan and invites all employees to participate 
at the discretion of the Committee, therefore 
encouraging wider workforce share ownership. 

There is no consultation with employees regarding 
Director’s remuneration.

Service contracts
James Saralis’ service contract is on a rolling basis 
and may be terminated on six months’ notice by 
the Company or the Executive. 

All Non-Executive Directors have initial fixed-term 
agreements with the Company of no more than 
three years.

Details of the Directors’ service contracts and 
notice periods are set out below:

Commencement 

Normal notice 
period

4 January 2018 

six months

1 June 2016 

three months

1 November 2014 

three months

25 June 2020 

three months

19 July 2019 

three months

78 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

79

 
 
Directors’  
Report

The Directors of NAHL Group plc present their Annual Report 
and audited consolidated financial statements for the year 
ended 31 December 2020.

Results and dividend
The Group’s loss after tax for the year was £0.2m 
(2019: loss of £3.0m).

The Directors do not propose a final dividend (2019: 
0.0p per share).

A review of the business, including future 
developments, is included in the Strategic Report 
on pages 4–54.

Directors’ third-party 
indemnity provisions
The Company maintained during the year and to 
the date of approval of the financial statements, 
indemnity insurance for its Directors and Officers 
against liability in respect of proceedings brought 
by third parties, subject to the terms and conditions 
of the Companies Act 2006.

Post balance sheet events
There are no other significant events affecting the 
Company and the Group since the statement of 
financial position date.

Substantial shareholdings
The Group was notified of the following interests 
amounting to 10% or more of its issued share 
capital at the financial year end:

Lombard Odier Asset Management 19.12%

Schroder Investment Management 16.68% 

Harwood Capital 13.31%

Capital structure
Details of the capital structure can be found in note 
21 of the consolidated financial statements. The 
Group has employee share option plans in place, 
full details of which can be found in note 22 to the 
financial statements.

Financial instruments
The Group’s principal financial instruments 
comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade and 
other receivables, interest-bearing loans and trade 
and other payables. Further details on financial 
instruments are given in note 24 to the financial 
statements.

Directors
The Directors of the Company who were in office 
during the year and up to the date of signing the 
financial statements were:

T J M Aspinall (Independent Non-Executive, Chair 
from 8 October 2020)

C A Brown (Chair, resigned 8 October 2020) 

J R Atkinson (Chief Executive Officer, resigned 7 
September 2020)

J D Saralis (Chief Financial Officer)

G D C Kent (Independent Non-Executive)

S P Tilleray (Independent Non-Executive)

B Phillips (Independent Non-Executive, appointed 
25 June 2020)

Biographies of the present Directors of the 
Company are listed on pages 56–57.

Details of the remuneration of the Directors is 
disclosed in the Remuneration Report on pages 
68–74.

Political donations
No political donations were made during the year or 
the previous year.

Statement on engagement 
with employees
For information on how the Group has engaged 
with employees during the year, see Our Culture, 
Our Business on pages 18–22.

Statement of relationships 
with suppliers, customers 
and others
For information on how the Group has maintained 
relationships with suppliers, customers and others, 
see Section 172 statement on pages 52–54. 

Group’s policy concerning 
employment of disabled 
persons
NAHL Group plc is committed to providing 
equal opportunities for all and taking action on 
unlawful discrimination. We seek to recruit, train 
and promote based on experience, skills and 
performance and provide our employees with the 
necessary tools and equipment to allow them to 
perform their duties to the best of their abilities.

Auditor
Mazars LLP was appointed as Auditor during 
the year and have expressed their willingness to 
continue in office as Auditor and a resolution to 
reappoint them will be proposed at the forthcoming 
Annual General Meeting.

Other information
An indication of likely future developments in the 
business and particulars of significant events 
which have occurred since the end of the year have 
been included in the Strategic Report on pages 
4–54 along with information regarding employee 
matters. Information regarding the Group’s 
financial risk management objectives and policies 
is included in note 24 to the financial statements on 
page 126.

Going concern
In determining the appropriate basis of preparation 
of the financial statements, the Directors are 
required to consider whether the Company and 
Group can continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future.

The Board have considered detailed financial 
forecasts of future trading, profits and cash 
flows covering a range of potential scenarios that 
account for any further impacts of COVID-19 on the 
business. The going concern assessment focuses 
on two key areas, being the ability of the Group to 
meet its debts as they fall due and being able to 
operate within its banking facility. 

80 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

81

The Group has access to a £25.0m revolving credit 
facility (RCF) with its bankers and at the time of 
writing, it has drawn £20.0m of this facility and has 
cash of £3.6m. In all of the scenarios the Group has 
modelled it would have sufficient liquidity within its 
current RCF to meet its liabilities as they fall due 
and would not need to access additional funding.

The Group’s RCF is subject to quarterly covenant 
testing and all of the scenarios modelled suggest 
that the Group will continue to operate within its 
covenants for the foreseeable future.

The Group has modelled a worst case scenario, 
assuming that volumes fall back to their 2020 
levels, and has then considered the options it would 
have available to mitigate against any shortfall in 
profits and cash. Under this scenario, the Group 
would be able to implement sufficient mitigating 
actions in order to operate within its covenants. The 
likelihood of this scenario occurring is considered 
to be remote and therefore the directors consider 
the Going Concern basis of accounting to be 
appropriate. 

The directors have also considered the ability of 
the Group to refinance, given the loan term expires 
on 31 December 2022, and are confident that the 
Group will be able to secure future funding.

Considering the above, the Directors have a 
reasonable expectation that the Company and 
Group have adequate resources to continue in 
existence for the foreseeable future and have 
concluded it is appropriate to adopt the going 
concern basis of accounting in the preparation of 
the financial statements.

Energy and Carbon 
Reporting
This is the first year the Group has been required 
to comply with the Streamline Energy and Carbon 
Reporting (SECR) legislation and therefore 
comparative information has not been provided.

Methodology
The report follows the SECR guidance and the GHG 
Reporting Protocol – Corporate Standard as the 
accepted methodology to meet the mandatory 
requirements. No additional optional elements 
have been included. The UK Government’s 
greenhouse gas conversion factors have been 
used to calculate the carbon emissions. The 
below table demonstrates the GHG Emissions and 
Energy Usage Data for the financial year ended 
31 December 2020. For offices where electricity 
is part of a service charge, usage has been 
estimated based on adjusting the bills received 
for other offices around the Group. No data has 
been included for business mileage as this was 
immaterial for 2020 (<1% of the overall total).

Energy consumption used 
to calculate emissions 
(electricity/mWh)

Energy consumption used to 
calculate emissions (gas/mWh)

Emissions from purchased gas 
tCO2e (scope 1)

Emissions from purchased 
electricity tCO2e (scope 2)

Intensity measurement (tonnes 
CO2e per employee)

All energy use is in the UK. 

260.84

214.42

39.4

66.0

0.42

Intensity measurement
The Group has chosen tonnes of gross CO2e per 
employee as the reported SECR intensity metric. 
This is considered to be the most appropriate basis 
for an office based operation that relies heavily on 
its workforce to provide services to its customers. 
This is a relevant and common business metric and 
will serve as a consistent comparative for reporting 
purposes going forwards.

Energy efficiency actions 
taken
The Group operates from several locations around 
the UK and its workforce is largely office-based. As 
an office-based operation, the Group considers its 
largest carbon footprint to come from the use of 
energy used in an office environment e.g. light, heat 
and computer usage and therefore it has focused 
its efficiency actions around this area. During 
2020 the Group rationalised its operations and 
closed its Chancery Lane office, generating both 
cost and energy savings. The Group also moved 

its offices in both Daventry and Kettering and took 
this opportunity to review its energy suppliers, 
opting for greener alternatives. As of February 
2020, the Daventry office was using 100% green 
energy and as of January 2021, the Kettering office 
also made the switch to a green energy supplier. 
Given that most of the Group’s workforce were 
homebased throughout 2020, there was limited 
scope to implement energy savings initiatives in 
the offices and so choosing green suppliers was 
considered the best alternative. As part of these 
office moves, initiatives such as switching to LED 
lightbulbs was factored into the office re-fits and air 
conditioning provision is being made using recycled 
refrigeration. 

Group response to Modern 
Slavery Act 2015
1. Organisational structure and 
recruitment processes
The Group’s organisational structures 
include the Board, Senior Management 
teams across two divisions. A contact centre 
at one of the three locations and standard 
support functions across all sites. 

Recruitment processes include the monitoring 
of passport documentation, with all new recruits 
expected to show their passport as a proof 
of identity. The Group also reviews shared 
addresses. In addition, the Group monitors the 
ongoing wellbeing of its employees through line 
management relationships and operates an 
Employee Assistance Programme. 

Where recruitment agencies are used to employ 
staff, the Group ensures these agencies also have 
an approved statement in support of the Modern 
Slavery Act 2015.

As these structures and recruitment processes 
apply to UK-based operations, the Group considers 
these to be very low risk.

2. Services 
The services NAHL Group plc provides to its 
customers and consumers are UK office-based, 
with UK field based service providers in regular 
contact with their operational management teams. 
The Group’s supply chain in relation to services 
consists on the whole of marketing and legal 
services in Personal Injury and specialist associates 
in Critical Care and Residential Property. The Group 
considers these to be very low risk in relation to 
slavery and human trafficking so takes no specific 
action in relation to these relationships. 

3. Goods 
In terms of goods supplied to the Group, the 
majority of goods will be goods for use in an 
office environment such as stationery and office 
equipment. The Group considers these to be very 
low risk in relation to slavery and human trafficking 
so takes no specific action in relation to these 
relationships.

Statement of Directors’ 
Responsibilities 
The Directors are responsible for preparing the 
Annual Report and the financial statements in 
accordance with applicable law and regulation. 
Company law requires the Directors to prepare 
financial statements for each financial year. 
Under that law the directors have prepared the 
Group financial statements in accordance with 
International Accounting Standards in conformity 
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 
and Company financial statements in accordance 
with International Accounting Standards  in 
conformity with the requirements of the Companies 
Act 2006. Under Company Law the Directors must 
not approve the financial statements unless they 
are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of 
the state of affairs of the Group and Company and 
of the profit or loss of the Group and Company for 
that period. In preparing the financial statements, 
the Directors are required to:

   select suitable accounting policies and then apply 
them consistently; 

   state whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by 
the European Union have been followed for the 
Group financial statements and IFRS as adopted 
by the European Union have been followed for 
the Company financial statements, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and explained in 
the financial statements; 

   make judgements and accounting estimates that 
are reasonable and prudent; and

   prepare the financial statements on the going 
concern basis unless it is inappropriate to 
presume that the Group and Company will 
continue in business. 

The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding 
the assets of the Group and Company and hence 
for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and 
detection of fraud and other irregularities. The 
Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and 
explain the Group and Company’s transactions and 
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the 

82 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

83

financial position of the Group and Company and 
enable them to ensure that the financial statements 
comply with the Companies Act 2006. 

The Directors of the ultimate parent Company are 
responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the 
ultimate parent Company’s website. Legislation in 
the United Kingdom governing the preparation and 
dissemination of financial statements may differ 
from legislation in other jurisdictions. 

In the case of each director in office at the date the 
Directors’ Report is approved: 

   so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant 
audit information of which the Group and Parent 
Company auditors are aware; and 

   they have taken all the steps that they ought 
to have taken as a Director in order to make 
themselves aware of any relevant audit 
information and to establish that the Group and 
Parent Company auditors are aware of that 
information. 

This confirmation is given and should be 
interpreted in accordance with the provisions of 
s418 of the Companies Act 2006. 

On behalf of the Board 

James Saralis  
Chief Financial Officer  
4 June 2021

84 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

Financial
Statements
2020

to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other 
ethical responsibilities in accordance with these 
requirements. We believe that the audit evidence 
we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to 
provide a basis for our opinion.

Independent auditor’s 
report to the members  
of NAHL Group Plc
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of 
NAHL Group plc (the ‘parent company’) and its 
subsidiaries (the ‘group’) for the year ended 31 
December 2020 which comprise the Consolidated 
Statement of Comprehensive Income, the 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, 
the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, the 
Company Statement of Financial Position, the 
Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the 
Company Cash Flow Statement and notes to 
the financial statements, including a summary 
of significant accounting policies. The financial 
reporting framework that has been applied in their 
preparation is applicable law and international 
accounting standards in conformity with the 
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, 
as regards to the parent company financial 
statements, as applied in accordance with the 
provisions of the Companies Act 2006. 

Conclusions relating to 
going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have 
concluded that the directors’ use of the going 
concern basis of accounting in the preparation of 
the financial statements is appropriate. 

Our audit procedures to evaluate the directors’ 
assessment of the group’s and the parent 
company’s ability to continue to adopt the going 
concern basis of accounting included but were not 
limited to:

In our opinion, the financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with the requirements of 
the Companies Act 2006 and:

   give a true and fair view of the state of the group’s 
and of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 
December 2020 and of the group’s loss for the 
year then ended; and

   have been properly prepared in accordance with 
international accounting standards in conformity 
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 
and, as regards to the parent company financial 
statements, as applied in accordance with the 
provisions of the Companies Act 2006.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with 
International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs 
(UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities 
under those standards are further described in 
the “Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of 
the financial statements” section of our report. 
We are independent of the group in accordance 
with the ethical requirements that are relevant to 
our audit of the financial statements in the UK, 
including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied 

   Undertaking an initial assessment at the planning 
stage of the audit to identify events or conditions 
that may cast significant doubt on the group’s and 
parent company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern;

   Obtaining and reviewing management’s going 
concern assessment;

   Evaluating the directors’ method to assess the 
group’s and parent company’s ability to continue 
as a going concern;

   Applying our own sensitivity analysis and 
assessing management’s ability to take mitigating 
actions;

   Reviewing the terms of financing agreements 
and assessing the forecasted results against 
covenants in place to ensure these will not be 
breached;

   Evaluating the impact of the need to re-finance by 
December 2022 and the likelihood of being able to 
continue to secure required funding, as explained 
on page 98 of the financial statements;

   Evaluating the key assumptions used and 
judgements applied by the directors in forming 
their conclusions on going concern; and

   Evaluating the appropriateness of the directors’ 
disclosures in the financial statements.

Based on the work we have performed, we 
have not identified any material uncertainties 
relating to events or conditions that, individually 
or collectively, may cast significant doubt on 
the group’s and the parent company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern for a period of at least 
twelve months from when the financial statements 
are authorised for issue.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of 
the directors with respect to going concern are 
described in the relevant sections of this report.

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our 
professional judgement, were of most significance 
in our audit of the financial statements of the 
current period and include the most significant 
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether 
or not due to fraud) we identified, including those 
which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit 
strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; 
and directing the efforts of the engagement team. 
These matters were addressed in the context of our 
audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in 
forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide 
a separate opinion on these matters.

Key Audit Matter
Valuation of trade receivables 
and accrued income (Group)
The group’s accounting policy for financial 
assets and liabilities, which include trade 
receivables and accrued income, is set out 
in the accounting policy notes on page 107. 

The group enters into contracts with 
customers on varied terms. The nature 
of the industry in which the group 
operates in can sometimes result 
in long lead times between revenue 
recognition and cash generation, due 
to the time taken to settle cases. 

Following a review of the year-end trade 
receivables and accrued income balance 
of £26.7m (2019: £29.0m), we identified 
specific aged or individually significant 
balances totaling £22.3m where there is a 
risk these balances may not recoverable. 

We identified the valuation of these 
specific balances as a significant risk and 
key audit matter, given the subjectivity 
involved in assessing recoverability.

How our scope addressed this matter

Depending on the facts and circumstances of the  
respective balances, our audit procedures included,  
but were not limited to:

   Assessing the aging of the receivables balances, and 
performing a retrospective review against prior year 
balances to understand aging profiling to identify any 
potential issues related to recoverability;

   Assessing the level of cash receipts during the year and 
post year end against our expectation based on signed 
payment agreements. 

   Recalculating accrued income balances based on 
contractual fees and the number of enquiries with 
customers;

   Obtaining third party confirmation from customers of the 
number of outstanding enquiries passed to them.

   Assessing the adequacy of the work of one component 
auditor in respect of £5.2m of trade receivables and 
accrued income balances; and

   Considering management’s methodology for IFRS 9 
Expected Credit Losses, with reference to the level of debt 
write-offs during the year.

Our observations 
Based on the procedures performed, we are satisfied that 
the carrying value of the trade receivables and accrued 
income in the financial statements is reasonable. 

86 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

87

Key Audit Matter
Carrying Value of Goodwill 
(Group)
The Group’s accounting policies in respect 
of goodwill and impairment are set out in 
the accounting policy notes on pages 105 
and 108 respectively. 

The carrying value of goodwill is £55.5m 
(2019: £55.5m). In assessing the 
recoverability of goodwill, management 
prepare value in use calculations across 
their two cash generating units, Critical 
Care and Consumer Legal Services, which 
involves assumptions, such as future cash 
flows and the discount rate to apply to 
those.

Due to the subjectivity involved in 
estimating future performance and the 
significance of the carrying value of 
goodwill, we identified this as a significant 
risk and key audit matter. 

Valuation of investments 
(Parent company)
The group’s accounting policies in respect 
of impairment of investments is set out in 
the accounting policy notes on page 135.

The carrying value of NAHL Group Plc’s 
investments in subsidiaries is £52.7m 
(2019: £52.7m) and is the most significant 
balance in the parent company statement 
of financial position. Given this, we 
identified it as a significant risk and key 
audit matter.

How our scope addressed this matter

Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:

   Obtaining and reviewing management’s goodwill 
impairment assessment; 

   Assessing and challenging the reasonableness of key 
assumptions in the value in use calculations, and reviewing 
the directors’ sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of 
potential changes in assumptions;

   Applying our own severe sensitivities to the models to 
further assess the potential for impairment and assessing 
management’s potential mitigating actions;

   Engaging with our internal valuation experts to assess the 
reasonableness of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital 
(WACC) rate used; and

   Evaluating the reasonableness of the disclosures made in 
the financial statements in relation to the carrying value of 
goodwill.

Our observations 
Based on the procedures performed, we are satisfied that 
the carrying value of the goodwill in the financial statements 
is reasonable. 

Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:

   Obtaining and reviewing management’s assessment of the 
valuation of investments;

   Assessing and challenging the reasonableness of 
underlying assumptions to ensure these are reasonable;

   Engaging with our internal valuation experts to assess the 
reasonableness of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital 
(WACC) rate used; 

   Reviewing the carrying value with specific reference to the 
year end market capitalisation of the group; and

   Evaluation the reasonableness of the disclosures made in 
the financial statements in relation to the carrying value of 
investments.

Our observations 
Based on the procedures performed, we are satisfied 
that the carrying value of the investments in the financial 
statements is reasonable. 

Our application of materiality and an overview of the 
scope of our audit
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative 
thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope 
of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement 
line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and on the 
financial statements as a whole. Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the 
financial statements as a whole as follows:

Overall materiality Group financial statements                                £497k

Parent company financial statements          £841k

Where items in the parent company financial statements were included in the group 
financial statements, materiality was restricted to that applied to the group. 

How we 
determined it

Group materiality has been calculated by reference to adjusted profit before tax, of 
which it represents 7%. 

Parent company materiality has been calculated by reference to total assets, of 
which it represents 1%. 

Rationale for 
benchmark 
applied

Profit before tax (adjusted for net financing costs, share based payments, 
amortization and other exceptional items) has been identified as the principal 
benchmark within the group financial statements due this being the primary focus of 
shareholders.

Total assets has been identified as the principal benchmark within the parent 
company financial statements as it is considered to be the focus of shareholders due 
to being a holding company with no trade.

Performance 
materiality

Performance materiality is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability 
that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial 
statements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.

The performance materiality applied in our audit was:
Group financial statements                              £323k

Parent company financial statements         £546k

Reporting 
threshold

We agreed with the directors that we would report to them misstatements identified 
during our audit above £15k for the group financial statements and £25k for the 
parent company financial statements, as well as misstatements below these 
amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

88 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

89

As part of designing our audit, we assessed the 
risk of material misstatement in the financial 
statements, whether due to fraud or error, and 
then designed and performed audit procedures 
responsive to those risks. In particular, we looked at 
where the directors made subjective judgements, 
such as making assumptions on significant 
accounting estimates.

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that 
we performed sufficient work to be able to give 
an opinion on the financial statements as a whole. 
We used the outputs of a risk assessment, our 
understanding of the group and parent company, 
their environment, controls and critical business 
processes, to consider qualitative factors in order 
to ensure that we obtained sufficient coverage 
across all financial statement line items.

Our group audit scope included an audit of 
the group and the parent company financial 
statements of NAHL Group Plc. Based on our 
risk assessment, the parent company and five 
components of the group were subject to full 
scope audit and two components were subject to 
specific audit procedures on certain key balances. 
For the remaining components, in addition to 
desktop analytical review, we performed analysis 
at an aggregated group level to re-examine our 
assessment that there were no significant risks of 
material misstatement within these.

The parent company and those components of 
the group which were subject to full scope audit 
or specific audit procedures accounted for the 
following percentages of the group’s results for the 
year ended 31 December 2020:

Number of 
components

Total group revenue

Total profits and losses 
that make up group 
profit before tax

Total group 
assets

Full scope 
audits

Specific 
scope audits

Total

6

2

8

81%

15%

96%

91%

0%

91%

97%

2%

99%

One full scope audit was performed by a 
component auditor. For that entity, the group 
engagement team issued group instructions 
to the component auditor to direct their work. 
Group reporting appendices were returned by 
the component auditor and we reviewed their 
working papers to assess whether sufficient and 
appropriate audit procedures had been performed. 
Meetings were held with the component auditor 
at the planning and completion stage, to ensure 
the work was sufficiently directed by the group 
engagement team. The audit work for all other 
components was completed by the group 
engagement team.

At the parent level we also tested the consolidation 
process and carried out analytical procedures 

to confirm our conclusion that there were no 
significant risks of material misstatement of the 
aggregated financial information. 

Other information
The directors are responsible for the other 
information. The other information comprises the 
information included in the annual report, other 
than the financial statements and our auditor’s 
report thereon. Our opinion on the financial 
statements does not cover the other information 
and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly 
stated in our report, we do not express any form of 
assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial 
statements, our responsibility is to read the other 

   adequate accounting records have not been kept 
by the parent company, or returns adequate for 
our audit have not been received from branches 
not visited by us; or

   the parent company financial statements are not 
in agreement with the accounting records and 
returns; or

   certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration 
specified by law are not made; or

   we have not received all the information and 
explanations we require for our audit.

Responsibilities of 
Directors
As explained more fully in the directors’ 
responsibilities statement set out on page 83, the 
directors are responsible for the preparation of the 
financial statements and for being satisfied that 
they give a true and fair view, and for such internal 
control as the directors determine is necessary to 
enable the preparation of financial statements that 
are free from material misstatement, whether due 
to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors 
are responsible for assessing the group’s and the 
parent company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related 
to going concern and using the going concern basis 
of accounting unless the directors either intend to 
liquidate the group or the parent company or to 
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative 
but to do so.

information and, in doing so, consider whether 
the other information is materially inconsistent 
with the financial statements or our knowledge 
obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to 
be materially misstated. If we identify such 
material inconsistencies or apparent material 
misstatements, we are required to determine 
whether there is a material misstatement in the 
financial statements or a material misstatement 
of the other information. If, based on the work 
we have performed, we conclude that there is a 
material misstatement of this other information, we 
are required to report that fact.

We have nothing to report in this regard.

Opinions on other 
matters prescribed by the 
Companies Act 2006
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the 
course of the audit:

   the information given in the Strategic Report and 
the Directors’ Report for the financial year for 
which the financial statements are prepared is 
consistent with the financial statements; and

   the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report 
have been prepared in accordance with applicable 
legal requirements

Matters on which we are 
required to report by 
exception
In light of the knowledge and understanding of 
the group and the parent company and their 
environment obtained in the course of the audit, we 
have not identified material misstatements in the 
Strategic Report or the Directors’ Report.

We have nothing to report in respect of the 
following matters in relation to which the 
Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, 
in our opinion:

90 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

91

Auditor’s responsibilities 
for the audit of the 
financial statements 
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance 
about whether the financial statements as a whole 
are free from material misstatement, whether due 
to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report 
that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is 
a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that 
an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) 
will always detect a material misstatement when it 
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error 
and are considered material if, individually or in the 
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to 
influence the economic decisions of users taken on 
the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-
compliance with laws and regulations. We design 
procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined 
above, to detect material misstatements in respect 
of irregularities, including fraud. 

Based on our understanding of the group and its 
industry, we identified that the principal risks of 
non-compliance with laws and regulations related 
to the Companies Act 2006, UK tax legislation, and 
the group’s use of Covid-19 government support 
schemes, and we considered the extent to which 
non-compliance might have a material effect on the 
financial statements. 

In identifying and assessing risks of material 
misstatement in respect to irregularities including 
non-compliance with laws and regulations, our 
procedures included, but were not limited to: 

   At the planning stage of our audit, gaining 
an understanding of the legal and regulatory 
framework applicable to the group and the parent 
company, the industry in which they operate 
and considered the risk of acts by the group and 
the parent company which were contrary to the 
applicable laws and regulations; 

   Discussing with the directors and management 
the policies and procedures in place regarding 
compliance with laws and regulations; 

   Discussing amongst the engagement team the 
identified laws and regulations, and remaining 
alert to any indications of non-compliance; and

   During the audit, focusing on areas of laws and 
regulations that could reasonably be expected 
to have a material effect on the financial 
statements from our general commercial and 
sector experience and through discussions with 
the directors (as required by auditing standards), 
from inspection of the group’s and the parent 
company’s regulatory and legal correspondence 
and review of minutes of directors’ meetings in 
the year.

We evaluated the directors’ and management’s 
incentives and opportunities for fraudulent 
manipulation of the financial statements (including 
the risk of override of controls) and determined that 
the principal risks were related to posting manual 
journal entries to manipulate financial performance, 
management bias through judgements and 
assumptions in significant accounting estimates 
including goodwill impairment, investment 
valuation and recoverability of trade receivables 
and accrued income, significant one-off or unusual 
transactions, and revenue recognition in relation to 
cut-off. 

Our audit procedures in relation to fraud included 
but were not limited to:

   Making enquiries of the directors and 
management on whether they had knowledge of 
any actual, suspected or alleged fraud;

   Gaining an understanding of the internal controls 
established to mitigate risks related to fraud;

   Discussing amongst the engagement team the 
risks of fraud; and

   Addressing the risks of fraud through 
management override of controls by performing 
journal entry testing.

Our audit procedures in relation to fraud through 
revenue recognition specific to cut-off included, but 
were not limited to:

   Assessing management’s revenue recognition 
policy; and 

   Agreeing a sample of revenue transactions pre 
and post year end, to ensure they have been 
recognised in the appropriate period.

The primary responsibility for the prevention 
and detection of irregularities including fraud 
rests with both those charged with governance 
and management. As with any audit, there 

remained a risk of non-detection of irregularities, 
as these may involve collusion, forgery, 
intentional omissions, misrepresentations 
or the override of internal controls.

The risks of material misstatement that 
had the greatest effect on our audit, 
including fraud, are discussed under “Key 
audit matters” within this report. 

A further description of our responsibilities  
for the audit of the financial statements is located 
on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at 
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This 
description forms part of our auditor’s report.

Use of the audit report
This report is made solely to the company’s 
members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 
of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit 
work has been undertaken so that we might state 
to the company’s members those matters we are 
required to state to them in an auditor’s report 
and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent 
permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the company 
and the company’s members as a body for our 
audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we 
have formed.

Stephen Brown  
(Senior Statutory Auditor) for and on behalf  
of Mazars LLP

Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor 

The Pinnacle
160 Midsummer Boulevard
Milton Keynes
MK9 1FF
4 June 2021

92 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

93

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020

Revenue 
Cost of sales 

Gross profit 
Administrative expenses 

Underlying operating profit 
Exceptional items 

Operating profit 
Profit attributable to members’ non-controlling interests in LLPs 
Financial income 
Financial expense 

Loss before tax 
Taxation 

Loss and total comprehensive income for the year 

Earnings per share (p)
Basic earnings per share 
Diluted earnings per share 

2020 

£000 

40,875 
(21,602) 

19,273 
(14,964) 

5,659 
(1,350) 

4,309 
(4,115) 
168 
(585) 

(223) 
(2) 

(225) 

2020 
p 

(0.5) 
(0.5)  

Note 

1,2 

3 

1 
4 

2 
30 
7 
8 

9 

Note 

23 
23 

20191 
restated
£000

51,314
(27,033)

24,281
(21,718)

10,421
(7,858)

2,563
(4,474)
202
(615)

(2,324)
(635)

(2,959)

2019
p

(6.4)
(6.4)

1. During the year, the Group undertook a review of its accounting treatment and presentation of several significant items that resulted in the 
restatement of its 2019 results. See note 30 for further details. 

All profits and losses and total comprehensive income are attributable to the owners of the Company.

All profits and losses relate to continuing operations.

The notes on pages 98–132 form part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AT 31 DECEMBER 2020

Non-current assets
Goodwill 
Other intangible assets 
Property, plant and equipment 
Right of use assets 
Deferred tax asset 

Current assets
Trade and other receivables (including £7,828,000 (2019:
£8,279,000) due in more than one year) 
Cash and cash equivalents 

Total assets 

Current liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Lease liabilities 
Member capital and current accounts 
Current tax liability 

Non-current liabilities 
Lease liabilities 
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings 
Deferred tax liability 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Equity 
Share capital 
Share option reserve 
Share premium 
Merger reserve 
Retained earnings 

Note 

13 
15 
16 
17 
10 

18 

20 
17 

17 
19 
11 

21 

2020 

£000 

55,489 
4,557  
367  
2,761  
14  

63,188  

34,285  
3,609  

37,894  

101,082  

(17,547)  
(248)  
(4,177)  
(126)  

20191 
restated
£000

55,489
5,082
267
264
30

61,132

37,871
2,564

40,435

101,567

(17,216)
(187)
(3,315)
(363)

(22,098)  

(21,081)

(2,195)  
(19,901)  
(826)   

(22,922)  

(45,020)  

(60)
(23,594)
(1,068)

(24,722)

(45,803)

56,062  

55,764

115 
3,912  
14,595 
(66,928)  
104,368  

115
3,389
14,595
(66,928)
104,593

Capital and reserves attributable to the owners of NAHL Group plc 

56,062  

55,764

1. During the year, the Group undertook a review of its accounting treatment and presentation of several significant items that resulted in the 
restatement of its 2019 results. See note 30 for further details.

The notes on pages 98–132 form part of these financial statements.

These financial statements on pages 94–132 were approved by the Board of Directors on  4 June 2021 and 
were signed on its behalf by:

J D Saralis 
Director

Company registered number: 08996352

94 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

95

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020

Share 
capital 

£000 

Share 
option 

Share 
reserve  premium 

£000 

£000 

Merger 
reserve 

£000 

Note 

Capital and 
reserves 
Non- 
attributable to 
the owners of  controlling 
interest 

Retained 
earnings  NAHL Group plc 

£000 

£000 

£000 

Total
equity

£000

Balance at 1 January
2019 as previously  
reported 

Adjustment to presentation  
of members’ non-controlling  
interests in LLPs1 

Balance at
1 January 2019 as  
restated 

115 

2,578  14,595  (66,928)  111,384 

61,744 

947  62,691

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

(947) 

(947)

115 

2,578  14,595  (66,928)  111,384 

61,744 

–  61,744

Total comprehensive income for the year
Loss for the year 

– 

Total comprehensive 
income 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity
Share-based payments 22 
– 
Dividends paid 
– 
27 

811 
– 

– 
– 

– 

(2,959) 

(2,959) 

– 

(2,959)

– 

(2,959) 

(2,959) 

– 

(2,959)

– 
– 

– 
(3,832) 

811 
(3,832) 

– 
– 

811
(3,832)

Total transactions with owners, recorded 
directly in equity 

– 

811 

– 

– 

(3,832) 

(3,021) 

– 

(3,021)

Balance at
31 December 2019 

115 

3,389  14,595  (66,928)  104,593 

55,764 

–  55,764

Total comprehensive income for the year
Loss for the year 

– 

Total comprehensive 
income 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity
Issue of share capital   26 
– 
Share-based
payments 

523 

22 

– 

– 

– 

– 

Total transactions with owners, recorded
directly in equity 

– 

523 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

(225) 

(225) 

(225) 

(225) 

– 

– 

– 

– 

523 

523 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

(225)

(225)

–

523

523

Balance at
31 December 2020 

Cash flows from operating activities 
Profit for the year 
Adjustments for: 
Profit attributable to members’ non-controlling interests in LLPs 
Property, plant and equipment depreciation 
Right of use asset depreciation 
Amortisation of intangible assets 
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets 
Financial income 
Financial expense 
Share-based payments 
Taxation 

Decrease/(Increase) in trade and other receivables 
Increase in trade and other payables 

Interest paid 
Tax paid 

Net cash generated from operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment 
Acquisition of intangible assets 
Interest received 
Disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed of1 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
(Repayment of)/Proceeds from borrowings 
Facility arrangement fees 
Principal element of lease payments 
Dividends paid 
Drawings (paid to)/capital receipts from LLP members 

Net cash (used in)/generated from financing activities 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January 

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 

Note 

2020 
£000 

2019
£000

(225) 

(2,959)

16 
17 
15 

7 
8 

4,115 
169 
430 
1,345 
– 
(168) 
585 
523 
2 

6,776 
2,223 
2,945 

11,944 
(469) 
(450) 

11,025 

(269) 
(820) 
10 
(1,273)1 

(2,352) 

(3,750) 
(121) 
(558) 
– 
(3,199) 

(7,628) 

1,045 
2,564 

3,609 

4,474
147
419
1,332
5,322
(202)
615
811
635

10,594
(8,880)
1,836

3,550
(529)
(1,479)

1,542

(219)
(463)
9
–

(673)

6,500
–
(465)
(3,832)
(2,106)

97

966
1,598

2,564

 115 

3,912  14,595   (66,928) 104,368 

56,062 

–  56,062

1. The entity disposed of its interest in National Law Associates LLP on 2 January 2020 and de-consolidated its results from this point

1. During the year, the Group undertook a review of its accounting treatment and presentation of several significant items that resulted in the 

The above consolidated cash flow statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

restatement of its 2019 results. See note 30 for further details. 

The notes on pages 98–132 form part of these financial statements.

96 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

97

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1 Accounting policies
Basis of preparation
Consolidated Financial Statements
NAHL Group plc (the “Company”) is a public 
company limited by shares registered, incorporated 
and domiciled in England and Wales. The registered 
number is 08996352 and the registered address 
is Bevan House, Kettering Parkway, Kettering, 
Northants, England, NN15 6XR.

The Consolidated Financial Statements for the 
year ended 31 December 2020 have been prepared 
in accordance with International Accounting 
Standards  in conformity with the requirements of 
the Companies Act 2006.

The consolidated financial information has been 
prepared on a going concern basis and under the 
historical cost convention.

The following accounting policies have been applied 
consistently year on year except where new policies 
have been adopted as stated below.

Going concern
In determining the appropriate basis of preparation 
of the financial statements, the Directors are 
required to consider whether the Company and 
Group can continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future.

The Board have considered detailed financial 
forecasts of future trading, profits and cash 
flows covering a range of potential scenarios that 
account for any further impacts of COVID-19 on the 
business. The going concern assessment focuses 
on two key areas, being the ability of the Group to 
meet its debts as they fall due and being able to 
operate within its banking facility. 

The Group has access to a £25.0m revolving credit 
facility (RCF) with its bankers and at the time of 
writing, it has drawn £19.0m of this facility and has 
cash of £3.5m. In all of the scenarios the Group has 
modelled it would have sufficient liquidity within its 
current RCF to meet its liabilities as they fall due 
and would not need to access additional funding.

The Group’s RCF is subject to quarterly covenant 
testing and all of the scenarios modelled suggest 
that the Group will continue to operate within its 
covenants for the foreseeable future.

The Group has modelled a worst case scenario, 
assuming that volumes fall back to their 2020 

levels, and has then considered the options 
it would have available to mitigate against 
any shortfall in profits and cash. Under this 
scenario, the Group would be able to implement 
sufficient mitigating actions in order to operate 
within its covenants. The likelihood of this 
scenario occurring is considered to be remote 
and therefore the directors consider the Going 
Concern basis of accounting to be appropriate.

The directors have also considered the ability of 
the Group to refinance, given the loan term expires 
on 31 December 2022, and are confident that the 
Group will be able to secure future funding.

Considering the above, the Directors have a 
reasonable expectation that the Company and 
Group have adequate resources to continue in 
existence for the foreseeable future and have 
concluded it is appropriate to adopt the going 
concern basis of accounting in the preparation of 
the financial statements.

Basis of consolidation
The financial statements represent a consolidation 
of the Company and its subsidiary undertakings 
as at the Statement of Financial Position date and 
for the year then ended. In accordance with IFRS 
10 the definition of control is such that an investor 
has control over an investee when: a) it has power 
over the investee, b) it is exposed, or has the rights, 
to variable returns from its involvement with the 
investee and c) has the ability to use its power to 
affect its returns. All three of these criteria must 
be met for an investor to have control over an 
investee. All subsidiary undertakings for which the 
Group meets these three criteria for control have 
been consolidated in the Group’s results.

The consolidated financial information incorporates 
the results of business combinations using the 
purchase method. In the Group statement of 
financial position, the acquiree’s identifiable assets, 
liabilities and contingent liabilities are initially 
recognised at their fair values at the acquisition 
date. The results of acquired operations are 
included in the Group statement of comprehensive 
income from the date on which control is obtained. 
They are deconsolidated from the date on which 
control ceases. Acquisition costs are expensed 
as incurred. This policy does not apply on the 
acquisition of Consumer Champion Group Limited 
for which reverse acquisition accounting has been 
applied. The Group recognises any non-controlling 

interest in the acquired entity on an acquisition-
by-acquisition basis either at fair value or at the 
non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of 
the acquired entity’s net identifiable assets.

Critical accounting judgements and 
key sources of estimation uncertainty
The preparation of financial statements in 
conformity with IFRS requires management to 
make judgements and estimates that affect the 
application of accounting policies and the reported 
amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. 
Estimates are based on past experience and other 
reasonable assessment criteria. Actual results 
may differ from these estimates. Estimates and 
underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing 
basis and revisions to accounting estimates are 
recognised in the year in which the estimates 
are revised and in any future years affected. 

In accordance with IAS 1 the Group is required to 
disclose critical accounting judgements and key 
sources of estimation uncertainty.

Critical accounting judgements
Control over an investee 
Within its Consumer Legal Services division 
the Group has interests in two Limited Liability 
Partnerships (LLPs) in conjunction with third 
party law firms. The LLPs are called Your Law 
LLP and Law Together LLP. Each LLP is run by 
a management board, which is responsible for 
the day-to-day operations, decision-making and 
strategic development of the LLPs. Through its 
100% subsidiary, Project Jupiter Limited, the 
Group has determined that it exercises control over 
these LLPs as it is entitled to appoint the majority of 
members to each of the management Boards, with 
the remainder being appointed by the respective 
third-party law firm.

In accordance with IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial 
Statements and given that the Group has overall 
control, the results and net assets of the LLPs have 
been consolidated within these financial statements 
with a corresponding liability recognised for the 
other member firms’ share of profit.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty
Revenue recognition – provision of legal 
services 
There is a significant element of estimation in 
determining the transaction price for revenue 
in relation to the provision of legal services for 
personal injury claims. Due to the nature of 
personal injury claims, the revenue the Group 
earns from a case is variable and dependent 
upon a) the stage at which a claim settles as 
this will determine the fixed fee and b) the final 
damages awarded to the client, of which the Group 
recognises a percentage as revenue. The Group 
must therefore estimate the revenue it expects 
to earn from a case once the first milestone is 
achieved (admission of liability). This estimation is 
based on an expected value method and assumes 
that cases can be grouped into categories of 
a similar nature (i.e. RTA vs. Non-RTA) that 
have similar characteristics. This assumption is 
considered appropriate as ultimately all cases 
follow one of a number of routes in the claims 
process. Management uses historical experience 
of the likelihood of claims settling at each stage 
and the average fee earned when a claim settles 
at each stage to estimate the transaction price. 
This estimate is revised as a claim moves through 
the process. No revenue is recognised until the 
first milestone is reached, being admission of 
liability, as it is at this point that it becomes highly 
probable that a case will succeed and therefore 
there is less risk of significant revenue write-offs 
in the future. Profits and losses arising from the 
differences in the estimated fee and the final 
fee are recognised on settlement of a case.

At the year-end, the Group has contract asset 
balances of £5,046,000 (2019: £4,134,000) 
calculated using this estimation technique.

98 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

99

1 Accounting policies continued

Recoverability of trade receivables
Trade receivables are reflected net of an estimated 
provision for impairment losses. In line with IFRS 
9, the Group uses an expected credit loss model 
to determine the provision for doubtful debts and 
also specific provisions for balances for which it has 
specific concerns over recoverability. The expected 
credit loss model involves segmenting debtors 
into groups and applying specific percentages to 
each of these debtor groupings. The Group has 
considered the profile of its debtor balance and 
has determined that a grouping based on credit 
terms is considered to be appropriate given the 
significant level of debt on extended credit terms. 
These groupings are based on those debtors 
due on standard terms, 6–12 month terms, 12– 
18 month terms and 18–24 month terms with 
higher percentages being applied the longer the 
term with the view that there is a greater risk of 
unforeseen circumstances arising the further away 
the settlement date. Standard debtors are also 
then reviewed for those past due and a percentage 
applied to those that are current, between 30–60 
days, 60–90 days and 90+ days overdue. See 
notes 18 and 24 for further information. At the year 
end, the Group had provisions for receivables of 
£673,000 (2019: £554,000) calculated using this 
method. The percentages applied to each grouping 
of debtors ranged from 0.5% to 35% with the final 
provision equating to 2.5% of the total gross trade 
receivables and accrued income balances. 

New standards and amendments adopted by 
the Group 
There are no new or amended standards applicable 
for the current reporting period.

New standards, interpretations and 
amendments not yet effective 
There are no new standards, interpretations and 
amendments that are not yet effective and that 
would be expected to have a material impact on the 
Group in the current or future reporting periods and 
on foreseeable future transactions.

Profit attributable to members’ non-controlling 
interests in LLPs
Profit attributable to member’s non-controlling 
interests in LLPs represents the operating profit 
for the year which is attributable to minority 
members in our LLP subsidiaries under the terms 
of the partnership agreements. It is presented as a 
separate expense outside of the operating profit of 
the Group for the year.

Statutory and non-statutory measures 
The financial statements contain all the statutory 
measures and disclosures required under IFRS, 
which is the financial reporting framework adopted 
by the Group. In addition to these measures, 
management monitors a number of non-statutory, 
alternative performance measures (APMs) as part 
of its internal performance monitoring and when 
assessing the future impact of operating decisions. 

The APMs allow a year-on-year comparison of 
the underlying performance of the business by 
removing the impact of items occurring either 
outside the normal course of operations or as a 
result of intermittent activities, such as acquisitions 
or strategic projects.

The Directors have presented these APMs in the 
Strategic Report because they believe they provide 
additional useful information for shareholders on 
underlying business trends and performance. As 
these APMs are not defined by IFRS, they may not 
be directly comparable to other companies’ APMs. 
They are not intended to be a substitute for, or 
superior to, IFRS measurements and the Directors 
recommend that the IFRS measures should also 
be used when users of this document assess the 
performance of the Group.

The APMs used in the Strategic Report are defined 
in the table on page 101. The principles to identify 
adjusting items have been adjusted from 2019 to 
remove the IFRS 2 share based payment charge 
and the amortisation charge arising on intangibles 
acquired as part of business combinations. Further 
details on this adjustment can be found in note 30. 
The key adjusting items in arriving at the APMs are 
as follows:

   Exceptional items are non-recurring items 
that are material by nature and separately 
identified to allow for greater comparability of 
underlying Group operating results year-on-year. 
Examples of exceptional items in the current 
and/or previous years include reorganisation 
and restructuring costs; revaluation of liability 
associated with legacy ATE products; and 
acquisition related costs. Exceptional costs 
are separately identified to allow for greater 
comparability of underlying Group operating 
results year-on-year.

Nature of 
measure

Related IFRS 
measure

Related IFRS 
source

Definition

Use/relevance

Allows management and users 
of the financial statements to 
assess the underlying trading 
results after removing material, 
non-recurring items that 
are not reflective of the core 
trading activities and allows 
comparability of core trading 
performance year-on-year.

Provides management with 
an indication of the amount of 
cash available for discretionary 
investing or financing after 
removing material non-recurring 
expenditure that does not reflect 
the underlying trading operations 
and allows management to 
monitor the conversion of 
underlying profit into cash.

Underlying 
operating 
profit

Operating 
profit

Consolidated 
income 
statement

Based on the related IFRS 
measure but excluding 
exceptional items.

Underlying 
operating 
cash flow

Cash 
flow from 
operating 
activities

Consolidated 
cash flow 
statement

Underlying 
cash 
conversion

Not defined 
by IFRS

n/a

Free Cash 
Flow

Not defined 
by IFRS

n/a

Based on the related IFRS 
measure but excluding 
cash flows in respect of 
the items excluded from 
underlying operating 
profit as described above.

Calculated as underlying 
operating cash flow 
divided by underlying 
operating profit.

Calculated as net cash 
generated from operating 
activities less net 
cash used in investing 
activities (excluding any 
disposals of subsidiaries) 
less payments made to 
partner LLP members 
and less principal element 
of lease payments. 

100 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

101

1 Accounting policies continued

Nature of 
measure

Related IFRS 
measure

Related IFRS 
source

Definition

Use/relevance

Underlying 
Basic EPS 

Basic EPS

Consolidated 
income 
statement

Based on the related IFRS 
measure but calculated 
using underlying profit 
after tax. 

Working 
capital

Consolidated 
statement of 
cash flows

Movement in 
receivables 
and 
movement 
in payables

Net cash/
(debt)

Not defined 
by IFRS

Consolidated 
cash flow 
statement

Working capital is not 
defined by IFRS. This is 
defined by management 
as being the movement 
in trade receivables less 
the movement in trade 
payables.

Net debt is defined 
as cash and cash 
equivalents less interest 
bearing borrowings net of 
loan arrangement fees.

Allows management and users 
of the financial statements to 
assess the underlying trading 
results after removing material, 
non-recurring items that 
are not reflective of the core 
trading activities and allows 
comparability of core trading 
performance year-on-year.

Allows management to  
assess the short-term cash  
flows from movements in the 
more liquid assets.

Allows management to monitor 
the overall level of debt in the 
business. As stated in the 
strategic report, loan funding 
is key to the Group’s future 
strategy as an increasing 
proportion of profits and cash 
flows are deferred until case 
settlement.

A reconciliation of each measure is provided as follows:

Underlying operating profit

IFRS measure – operating profit 
Exceptional items 

Underlying operating profit 

2020 
£000 

4,309 
1,350 

5,659 

2019
£000

2,563
7,858

10,421

Underlying operating cash flow and underlying cash conversion:

2020 
Underlying 
operations 
£000 

2020 
Exceptional 
items 
£000 

2019 
2019 
2020  Underlying  Exceptional 
items 
Total 
£000 
£000 

operations 
£000 

2019
Total
£000

Operating profit 

Share-based payments 
Depreciation and amortisation  
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets  
Decrease/(increase) in trade/other receivables 
Increase in trade/other payables 

5,659 

523 
1,944 
– 
2,223 
2,607 

(1,350)  4,309 

10,421 

(7,858) 

2,563

– 
– 
– 
– 
338 

523 
1,944 
– 
2,223 
2,945 

811 
1,898 
– 
(10,027) 
1,836 

– 
– 
5,322 
1,147 
– 

811
1,898
5,322
(8,880)
1,836

Underlying operating cash flow 

12,956 

(1,012)  11,944 

4,939 

(1,389) 

3,550

228.9% 

Operating cash conversion 
Interest paid 
Tax paid 
Net cash generated from operating activities 
Net cash used in investing activities  
(excluding disposals of subsidiaries) 
Lease payments 
Facility arrangement fees 
Payments to non-controlling interests 

Free cash flow 

Underlying basic EPS: 

IFRS measure – loss for the year attributable to shareholders 
Exceptional items 
Tax effect of the above 

Underlying profit for the year attributable to shareholders 

47.4% 

(469) 
(450) 
11,025 

(1,079) 
(558) 
(121) 
(3,199) 

  6,068 

2020 
£000 

(225) 
1,350 

(257) 

868 

(529)
(1,479)
1,542

(623)
(465)
–
(2,156)

(1,702)

2019
£000

(2,959)
7,858
(567)

4,332

Weighted average number of shares (note 23) 

46,238,878 

46,178,716

Underlying basic EPS (pence) 

1.9p 

9.4p

Working capital: 
Working capital movements for 2020 take into account the disposal  
of National Law Partners on 1 January 2020

Movement in trade and other receivables 
Movement in trade and other payables 

Working capital 
Movement in interest accruals 
Movement in corporation tax debtor 
Movement in financing accruals 
IFRS measure – movement in trade and other receivables  
less movement in trade and other payables 

Net debt is defined in note 29.

2020 
£000 

2,223 
2,945 

5,168 

(158) 
15 
110 

5,135 

2019
£000

(8,880)
1,836

(7,044)
(114)
(103)
–

(7,261)

102 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

103

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 Accounting policies continued

Revenue
Marketing services
Consumer Legal Services – Solicitor income 
(personal injury) 
Marketing services resulting in the provision of 
enquiries to Panel Law Firms. Management have 
determined that there is a single performance 
obligation being the provision of marketing 
services. As the Group undertakes this service on 
behalf of its customers, the service is considered 
to be simultaneously delivered and consumed by 
the customer and so it is considered to be satisfied 
over time. The transaction price is set for each 
customer based on a cost plus margin model and 
is allocated to the performance obligation using 
the input method based on the costs incurred of 
providing the service. Invoices are raised monthly 
for the services provided in that month and the 
revenue for that month is recognised at this point.

Consumer Legal Services – Conveyancing and 
surveyor instructions (residential property) 
The provision of online marketing services to target 
homebuyers and sellers in England and Wales and 
offering lead generation services to Panel Law 
Firms and surveyors in the conveyancing sector. 
Management consider there to be one performance 
obligation being the delivery of instructions to 
the Panel Law Firms and surveyors. Revenue is 
recognised at a point in time being the transfer of 
instruction to the Panel Law Firm or surveyor as it 
is at this point at which the Group has no further 
obligations in respect of the instruction and so 
control of the instruction passes to the customer. 
The full transaction price being the contractually 
agreed upon fixed fee per instruction is recognised 
as revenue at this point.

Service provision
Consumer Legal services – provision of 
resource (residential property) 
Income from the outsourcing of employees 
who provide services to process conveyancing 
transactions for homebuyers and sellers in 
England and Wales. Management consider 
there to be one performance obligation being 
the completion of the transaction as until 
this point there is no entitlement to revenue. 
The full transaction price being the agreed 
upon fee is recognised at this point. 

Consumer Legal Services – Provision of legal 
services  
Income from the provision of legal services for 
personal injury claims on a ‘no win – no fee’ 
arrangement. Management consider that this 
service comprises a single distinct performance 
obligation, being the provision of legal services to 
the customer and the transaction price is allocated 
to this single performance obligation. Revenue is 
recognised once control of the service is passed 
to the customer which is considered to be over 
time as the customer simultaneously receives and 
consumes the service provided.

The transaction price is variable in nature as on 
settlement of a successful case the Group will be 
entitled to a fixed fee recoverable from the liable 
third party (which is variable dependent upon which 
stage in the claims process the claim settles at) 
and a percentage of awarded damages. As these 
amounts are unknown at the outset of a case, 
management estimate the transaction price based 
on an expected value method. The expected value 
is based on prior and historical knowledge and 
experience of case settlement and is considered 
appropriate as all cases follow the same process.

Management consider that it is appropriate to 
allocate the transaction price and recognise 
revenue on an output basis using milestones. Due 
to the nature of personal injury claims, the revenue 
receivable from progressing a case is not directly 
attributable to the hours worked as a case can still 
fail despite hours being worked on it. Due to the 
no-win, no-fee arrangement, no revenue would 
be receivable if the case fails despite the hours 
worked. An input method is therefore considered 
to be inappropriate. An output approach based 
on key milestones to progress a case is therefore 
considered to be appropriate as it best reflects 
the value of the service to the customer. These 
milestones are 1. Admission of liability and 2. 
Settlement of the case. No revenue is recognised 
up until the first milestone, admission of liability, 
has been achieved as it is at this point that it 
becomes highly probable that recognising revenue 
would not lead to a reversal in the future.

Critical Care – Case management services  
Case management support within the medico-legal 
framework for multi-track cases. Management 
consider that the performance obligation is the 
provision of case management support and as the 
service is simultaneously delivered and consumed 
by the customer then revenue is measured over 
time based on an input approach being the hours 
worked by each consultant. The transaction price, 
being the contractually agreed upon hourly fee rate, 
is allocated on a per hour basis. Revenue is invoiced 
monthly based on the hours worked in that month 
and recognised at this point.

Expert Reports
Critical Care – Expert witness revenue  
Provision of expert witness reports. In line with 
IFRS 15, revenue is measured on satisfaction of 
the performance obligation when control of the 
report is passed to the customer. Management 
consider there to be one performance obligation 
which is the provision of the expert witness report 
and as the customer has no control over the report 
until it is delivered in its final form, revenue is 
measured at the point in time when the report is 
delivered. Where the terms of the contract allow for 
recoverability of work performed to date should a 
customer terminate this contract, an adjustment is 
made at each month end to accrue for revenue on 
any such reports in progress. This is subsequently 
reversed and the full transaction price recognised 
on provision of the final report.

Consumer Legal Services – Search reports 
Provision of search reports. Management consider 
there to be one performance obligation being the 
delivery of the search report. Revenue is recognised 
at a point in time being the transfer of the report to 
the customer. The full transaction price being the 
contractually agreed upon fixed fee per report is 
recognised as revenue at this point.

Product provision
Consumer Legal services – Product income 
Commissions received from product providers for 
the sale of additional products to the Panel Law 
Firms. Revenue is recognised at a point in time on 
satisfaction of the performance obligation being 
the sale of the product to a Panel Law Firm with 
provisions in place for clawbacks.

Pre-LASPO ATE – Revenue from commissions 
received from the insurance provider for the use of 
after the event policies by Panel Law Firms.

From 1 April 2013, this product was no longer 
available as a result of LASPO regulatory changes. 
Consequently, there is a remaining liability which is 
being unwound through revenue as historic cases 
are settled.

All revenue is stated net of Value Added Tax. The 
entire revenue arose in the United Kingdom.

Government grants
As a result of the economic impact of the 
COVID-19 pandemic, the Group made use of the 
Government’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. 
Income from this scheme has been accounted 
for under IAS 20: Government Grants and is 
included within the consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income as a deduction from the 
corresponding expense.

Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the fair value 
of the consideration given over the fair value 
of the Group’s share of the net identifiable 
assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date 
of acquisition. Goodwill is not amortised but 
is tested for impairment annually and again 
whenever indicators of impairment are detected 
and is carried at cost less any provision for 
impairment. Any impairment is recognised in 
the statement of comprehensive income.

Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the 
Group and have finite useful lives are measured 
at cost less accumulated amortisation and 
any accumulated impairment losses. Software 
assets are measured at the cost of bringing 
the asset into use. This may include externally 
incurred consultant costs or a proportion of 
internal time and salary where internal resources 
have been used to build the asset. Internally 
allocated time is based on hours spent bringing 
the asset into use multiplied by hourly salary 
rates. Technology related intangibles, contract 
related intangibles and brand names were 
acquired through business combinations. These 
were independently valued and determined 
to be separately identifiable from goodwill.

Amortisation
Intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line 
basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Technology related 
intangibles

Contract related 
intangibles

Brand names

Software

–

–

–

–

5 to 10 years

3 to 10 years

3 to 10 years

3 to 5 years

No amortisation is charged on assets under 
construction until the point they are brought  
into use.

104 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

105

1 Accounting policies continued

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are measured at 
cost less accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation
Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost, 
less estimated residual value, of property, plant 
and equipment by equal instalments over their 
estimated useful economic lives as follows:

Fixtures and fittings – 3 to 10 years

Lease assets
The Group as a lessee 
For any new contracts entered into on or after 1 
January 2020, the Group considers whether a 
contract is, or contains a lease. A lease is defined 
as ‘a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys 
the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for 
a period of time in exchange for consideration’. To 
apply this definition the Group assesses whether 
the contract meets three key evaluations which are 
whether:

   the contract contains an identified asset, which 
is either explicitly identified in the contract or 
implicitly specified by being identified at the time 
the asset is made available to the Group

   the Group has the right to obtain substantially all 
of the economic benefits from use of the identified 
asset throughout the period of use, considering its 
rights within the defined scope of the contract

   the Group has the right to direct the use of the 
identified asset throughout the period of use. The 
Group assesses whether it has the right to direct 
‘how and for what purpose’ the asset is used 
throughout the period of use.

Measurement and recognition of leases as a 
lessee 
At lease commencement date, the Group 
recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability 
on the balance sheet. The right-of-use asset is 
measured at cost, which is made up of the initial 
measurement of the lease liability, any initial direct 
costs incurred by the Group, an estimate of any 
costs to dismantle and remove the asset at the 
end of the lease, and any lease payments made in 
advance of the lease commencement date (net of 
any incentives received).

The Group depreciates the right-of-use assets on a 
straight-line basis from the lease commencement 
date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of 
the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. 
The Group also assesses the right-of-use asset for 
impairment when such indicators exist.

At the commencement date, the Group measures 
the lease liability at the present value of the lease 
payments unpaid at that date, discounted using 
the interest rate implicit in the lease if that rate 
is readily available or the Group’s incremental 
borrowing rate. Lease payments included in the 
measurement of the lease liability are made up 
of fixed payments (including in substance fixed), 
variable payments based on an index or rate, 
amounts expected to be payable under a residual 
value guarantee and payments arising from options 
reasonably certain to be exercised.

Subsequent to initial measurement, the liability 
will be reduced for payments made and increased 
for interest. It is remeasured to reflect any 
reassessment or modification, or if there are 
changes in in-substance fixed payments. When the 
lease liability is remeasured, the corresponding 
adjustment is reflected in the right-of-use asset, or 
profit and loss if the right-of-use asset is already 
reduced to zero.

The Group has elected to account for short-term 
leases and leases of low-value assets using the 
practical expedients. Instead of recognising a 
right-of-use asset and lease liability, the payments 
in relation to these are recognised as an expense in 
profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease 
term.

Taxation
Tax in the statement of comprehensive income for 
the year comprises current and deferred tax. Tax 
is recognised in the statement of comprehensive 
income except to the extent that it relates to items 
recognised directly in equity, in which case it is 
recognised in equity. Current tax is the expected 
tax payable or receivable on the taxable income 
or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or 
substantively enacted at the balance sheet date, 
and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of 
previous years.

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences 
between the carrying amounts of assets and 
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and 
the amounts used for taxation purposes. The 
following temporary differences are not provided 
for: the initial recognition of goodwill; the initial 
recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither 
accounting nor taxable profit other than in a 
business combination; and differences relating to 
investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they 
will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future. 
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on 
the expected manner of realisation or settlement 

of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, 
using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted 
at the balance sheet date. A deferred tax asset is 
recognised only to the extent that it is probable that 
future taxable profits will be available against which 
the temporary difference can be utilised.

Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are recognised initially 
at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, 
trade and other receivables are stated at amortised 
cost using the effective interest method, less any 
impairment losses calculated in line with IFRS 9.

Classification of financial instruments 
issued by the Group
Financial instruments issued by the Group are 
treated as equity (i.e. forming part of equity) only 
to the extent that they meet the following two 
conditions:

a)  they include no contractual obligations upon 
the Company (or Group as the case may be) 
to deliver cash or other financial assets or to 
exchange financial assets or financial liabilities 
with another party under conditions that are 
potentially unfavourable to the Company (or 
Group); and

b)  where the instrument will or may be settled in the 
Company’s own equity instruments, it is either 
a non-derivative that includes no obligation to 
deliver a variable number of the Company’s own 
equity instruments or is a derivative that will be 
settled by the Company’s exchanging a fixed 
amount of cash or other financial assets for a 
fixed number of its own equity instruments.

To the extent that this definition is not met, the 
proceeds of issue are classified as a financial 
liability. Where the instrument so classified 
takes the legal form of the Company’s own 
shares, the amounts presented in these 
financial statements for called up share 
capital and share premium account exclude 
amounts in relation to those shares.

Finance payments associated with financial 
liabilities are dealt with as part of interest 
payable and similar charges. Finance payments 
associated with financial instruments that 
are classified as part of shareholders’ funds 
are dealt with as appropriations in the 
reconciliation of movements in equity.

Financial assets and liabilities
The Group’s principal financial instruments 
comprise cash and cash equivalents, trade and 
other receivables, trade and other payables and 
interest bearing borrowings.

Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are recognised initially at 
fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, trade 
and other payables are stated at amortised cost 
using the effective interest method.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash 
balances. Cash and cash equivalents are repayable 
on demand and are recognised at their carrying 
amount.

Interest-bearing borrowings
Interest-bearing borrowings are recognised 
initially at fair value less attributable transaction 
costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, 
interest-bearing borrowings are stated at 
amortised cost using the effective interest 
method, less any impairment losses.

Recoverable disbursements and Disbursements 
payable
Disbursement payables represent the balance 
of disbursements incurred in the processing of 
personal injury claims. These disbursements will 
ultimately be billed on settlement of a case or 
recovered from insurance if a case should fail and 
so the recoverable disbursements represents 
the value of disbursements still to be billed. 
Disbursement payables and receivables are 
recognised initially at fair value and subsequent 
to initial recognition, are stated at amortised cost 
using the effective interest method.

Member capital and current accounts
Member capital and current accounts represent 
the balances owed to non-controlling members’ 
in the LLPs. These consist of any capital advances 
and unpaid allocated profits as at the year end. 
Members capital and current accounts are 
classified as financial liabilities and are recognised 
initially at fair value. Subsequent to initial 
recognition, members capital and current accounts 
are stated at amortised cost using the effective 
interest method.

106 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

107

1 Accounting policies continued

Employee share schemes
The share option plans allow employees of the 
Group to acquire shares of the Company. The 
fair value of options granted is recognised as an 
employee expense with a corresponding increase in 
equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and 
spread over the period during which the employees 
become unconditionally entitled to the options. The 
fair value of the options granted is measured using 
an option pricing model, taking into account the 
terms and conditions upon which the options were 
granted. The amount recognised as an expense 
is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share 
options that are expected to vest except where 
forfeiture is only due to share prices not achieving 
the threshold for vesting. 

Exceptional items
Exceptional items are non-recurring items that 
are material by nature and separately identified 
to allow for greater comparability of underlying 
Group operating results year-on-year. Examples of 
exceptional items in the current and/or previous 
years include reorganisation and restructuring 
costs; revaluation of liability associated with legacy 
ATE products; and acquisition related costs.

Exceptional costs are separately identified to allow 
for greater comparability of underlying Group 
operating results year on year.

Impairment
The carrying amounts of the Group’s non- financial 
assets, other than deferred tax assets, are reviewed 
at each reporting date to determine whether there 
is any indication of impairment.

If any such indication exists, then the asset’s 
recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill, and 
intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives or 
that are not yet available for use, the recoverable 
amount is estimated each year at the same time.

The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is 
the greater of its value in use and its fair value 
less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the 
estimated future cash flows are discounted to their 
present value using a pre-tax discount rate that 
reflects current market assessments of the time 
value of money and the risks specific to the asset. 

For the purpose of impairment testing, assets 
that cannot be tested individually are grouped 
together into the smallest group of assets that 
generates cash inflows from continuing use that 
are largely independent of the cash inflows of other 
assets or groups of assets (the Cash Generating 
Unit or CGU). The goodwill acquired in a business 
combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, 
is allocated to CGUs. For the purposes of goodwill 
impairment testing, CGUs to which goodwill has 
been allocated are aggregated so that the level 
at which impairment is tested reflects the lowest 
level at which goodwill is monitored for internal 
reporting purposes. Goodwill acquired in a business 
combination is allocated to groups of CGUs that 
are expected to benefit from the synergies of the 
combination.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying 
amount of an asset or its CGU exceeds its 
estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses 
are recognised in the statement of comprehensive 
income. Impairment losses recognised in respect 
of CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying 
amount of any goodwill allocated to the units, and 
then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other 
assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata 
basis.

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not 
reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment 
losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at 
each reporting date for any indications that the loss 
has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment 
loss is reversed if there has been a change in the 
estimates used to determine the recoverable 
amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the 
extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not 
exceed the carrying amount that would have been 
determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if 
no impairment loss had been recognised. 

Pensions
The Group operates a stakeholder defined 
contribution pension scheme for employees. The 
assets of the scheme are held separately from 
those of the Company. The annual contributions 
payable are charged to the statement of 
comprehensive income.

Dividends
Dividend distribution to the Company’s 
shareholders is recognised in the Group’s financial 
statements in the period in which the dividends are 
approved by the Company’s shareholders or, in the 
case of interim dividends, when paid.

Member drawings
Drawings are made to members in line with the 
provisions as stated in the partnership agreements. 
Members may draw an amount not in excess of 
their profit share for the relevant accounting period 
and drawings may be limited depending on the cash 
requirements of the LLP. Drawings are recognised 
once paid.

Share option reserve
The share option reserve is the corresponding 
charge to equity in respect of the IFRS 2 share base 
payment charge.

Merger reserve
The merger reserve represents the excess of 
the fair value of shares acquired through share 
for share exchange. In 2014 NAHL Group plc 
declared a bonus issue of a single deferred share 
of £0.0001 (a Deferred Share) with a share 
premium of £50,000,000. This transaction 
resulted in £50,000,000 of the merger reserve 
being transferred to the share premium account. 
In 2015 a further amount standing to the credit 
of the Company’s merger reserve in the sum of 
£16,928,000 was capitalised by way of a bonus 
issue of newly created Capital Reduction Shares.

Financial income and expenses
Interest income and interest payable is recognised 
in the consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income as it accrues, using the effective interest 
method. Issue costs of borrowings are initially held 
on balance sheet within the fair value of interest 
bearing borrowings and are subsequently expensed 
to the statement of comprehensive income over 
the contractual life of the associated borrowings.

108 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

109

2 Operating segments

Year ended 
31 December 2020  

Consumer 
Legal Services 
£000 

Critical 
Care 
£000 

Revenue 
Depreciation and 
amortisation 
Operating profit/
(loss) 
Profit attributable to  
non-controlling  
interest members 
in LLPs 
Financial income 
Financial expenses 
Profit/(Loss) 
before tax 
Trade receivables 
Total assets1 
Segment liabilities1 
Capital expenditure  
(including intangibles) 

Year ended
31 December 2019  

Revenue 
Depreciation and 
amortisation 
Operating profit/
(loss) 
Profit attributable to  
non-controlling  
interest members 
in LLPs 
Financial income 
Financial expenses 
Profit/(Loss) 
before tax 
Trade receivables 
Total assets1 
Segment liabilities1 
Capital expenditure 
(including intangibles) 

Other 
items 
£000 

Underlying  Exeptional 
operations  
£000 

items  Eliminations2 
£000 
£000 

Group 
£000 

– 

29,537 

11,338 

– 

40,875 

(636) 

(137) 

(247) 

(924) 

(1,944) 

– 

– 

5,407 

3,594 

(1,895) 

(1,447) 

5,659 

(1,350) 

(4,115) 
161 
(1) 

– 
6 
(8) 

– 
1 
(576) 

– 
– 
– 

(4,115) 
168 
(585) 

– 
– 
– 

Total
£000

40,875

(1,944)

4,309

(4,115)
168
(585)

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

3,592 
(2,470) 
1,452 
– 
4,870 
3,422 
32,859 
5,990  79,739 
(19,001)  (1,232)  (3,934) 

(1,447) 
– 
– 
– 

1,127 
8,292 
118,588 
(24,167) 

(1,350) 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
(17,506) 
– 

(223)
8,292
101,082
(24,167)

540 

244 

305 

– 

1,089 

– 

– 

1,089

37,748 

13,566 

– 

– 

51,314 

(781) 

(152) 

(5) 

(960) 

(1,898) 

– 

– 

8,796 

5,013 

(1,617) 

(1,771) 

10,421 

(7,858) 

(4,474) 
201 
(7) 

– 
– 
(10) 

– 
1 
(598) 

– 
– 
– 

(4,474) 
202 
(615) 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

51,314

(1,898)

2,563

(4,474)
202
(615)

4,516 
5,057 
35,180 
(19,086) 

(2,214) 
5,003 
5,143 
4 
6,297  77,596 
(517) 
(1,175) 

(1,771) 
– 
– 
– 

5,534 
10,204 
119,073 
(20,778) 

(7,858) 
– 
– 
– 

– 
– 
(17,506) 
– 

(2,324)
10,204
101,567
(20,778)

457 

181 

44 

– 

682 

– 

– 

682

2 Operating segments continued

Significant customers
No customers account for greater than 10% of the 
total Group revenue (2019: no customers).

Geographic information
All revenue and assets of the Group are based in 
the UK.

Critical Care – Revenue from the provision of 
expert witness reports and case management 
support within the medico-legal framework for 
multi-track cases.

Shared services – Costs that are incurred in 
managing Group activities or not specifically 
related to a product.

Other items – Other items represent share-based 
payment charges and amortisation charges on 
intangible assets recognised as part of business 
combinations.

Exceptional items – items that are non-recurring 
and that are material by nature and separately 
identified to allow for greater comparability of 
underlying Group operating results year-on-year. 
Examples of exceptional items in the current 
and/or previous years include reorganisation 
and restructuring costs; revaluation of liability 
associated with legacy ATE products; and 
acquisition related costs. Exceptional costs 
are separately identified to allow for greater 
comparability of underlying Group operating results 
year-on-year.

Operating segments
The activities of the Group are managed by the 
Board, which is deemed to be the chief operating 
decision maker (CODM). The CODM has identified 
the following segments for the purpose of 
performance assessment and resource allocation 
decisions. These segments are split along product 
lines. In the previous year management reported 
5 separate segments being Personal Injury, 
Residential Property, Critical Care, Group and 
Other items. During June 2020 the Board took 
the decision to merge the Personal Injury and 
Residential Property divisions in a Consumer Legal 
Services Division and to rename the Group division 
to Shared Services. The segmental reporting has 
been adjusted accordingly. Whilst the sub-totals 
shown as underlying operations remain unchanged, 
the comparatives have been restated on a 
consistent basis.

Consumer Legal services – Revenue is split 
along 3 separate streams being: a) Panel – 
revenue from the provision of personal injury 
and conveyancing enquiries to the Panel Law 
Firms, based on a cost plus margin model b) 
Products – consisting of commissions received 
from providers for the sale of additional products 
by them to the Panel Law Firms, surveys and 
the provision of conveyancing searches and c) 
Processing – in the case of our ABSs and self-
processing operations, revenue receivable from 
clients for the provision of legal services.

1. Total assets and segment liabilities exclude intercompany loan balances as these are not included in the segment results reviewed by the chief 
operating decision maker.

2. Eliminations represents the difference between the cost of subsidiary investments included in the total assets figure for each segment and the 
value of goodwill arising on consolidation.

During the year, the Group undertook a review of its accounting treatment and presentation of several 
significant items that resulted in the restatement of its 2019 results. See note 30 for further details.

110 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

111

 
 
3 Administrative expenses and auditor’s remuneration

5 Staff numbers and costs

Included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income are the following:

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 
Depreciation of right of use assets 
Amortisation of intangible assets (not relating to business combinations) 
Amortisation of intangible assets relating to business combinations 
IFRS 9 provision charge/(release) 
Government Grants 
Auditor’s remuneration 

The analysis of the auditor’s remuneration is as follows:

Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of
 parent company and consolidated financial statements 

Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for other services:
SRA audit 
Taxation advice 
Tax compliance services 

4 Exceptional items

Exceptional items included in the income statement are summarised below:

Group strategic and reorganisation costs1 
Group restructure2 
Due diligence costs3 
Termination of strategic partnership4 
Impairment of Residential Property goodwill and intangible assets5 

2020 
  £000 

169 
  430 
  421 
  924 
119 
  (410) 
125 

2019
£000

147
419
372
960
(355)
–
195

2020 
  £000 

2019
£000

120 

162

5 
– 
– 

–
10
23

2020 
  £000 

  613 
  399 
  338 
– 
– 

  1,350 

2019
£000

1,297
–
–
1,239
5,322

7,858

1. Group strategic and reorganisation costs relate to project costs to implement fundamental strategic plans that fall outside of the core trading 
operations of the business.

2. Group restructure costs largely relate to redundancy costs and other one-off costs associated with the closure of the Chancery Lane office and 
merger of the residential property and personal injury businesses into a new Consumer Legal Services division. 

3. Due diligence costs consisting of legal and advisory costs in respect of a potential offer made for the Group during the year. 

4. The decision was made in December 2019 to terminate the relationship in respect of National Law Associates LLP. As part of this agreement, a 
one-off provision of £1.1m was required along with £0.1m of legal and advisory fees incurred. 

5. In light of the 2019 trading performance of the Residential Property division and the emerging global risk of COVID-19 at that time, the directors 
conducted an impairment review of the Residential Property division and concluded that there are insufficient future cash flows to support the 
carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets attributable to the division. The assets were therefore written off in full.

The average number of persons employed by the Group (including Directors) during the year,  
analysed by category, was as follows:

Directors 
Others 

Number of Employees

2020 

2 
253 

255 

2019

2
237

239

The Group also has an average of 4 Non-executive directors (2019: 4) who provided services to the Group 
under service contracts. 

The aggregate payroll costs of these persons were as follows: 

Wages and salaries 
Share based payments (see note 22) 
Social security costs 
Other pension costs 

6 Directors’ emoluments

Statutory Directors’ emoluments 

Statutory Directors’ emoluments

Year ended 31 December 2020
Executive Directors
J R Atkinson1 
J D Saralis 
Non-Executive
C Brown3 
T J M Aspinall 
G D C Kent 
S P  Tilleray4 
B Phillips5 

2020 
£000 

9,364 
523 
909 
307 

2019
£000

8,331
811
867
338

11,103 

10,347

  2020 
  £000 

  771 

2019
£000

649

Salary 
and fees 
£000 

Benefits 
£000 

Annual 
bonus 
£000  

Pension 
£000 

Total
£000

159 
162 

62 
58 
47 
48 
23 

13 
16 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

559 

29 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

2 
2 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

4 

174
180

62
58
47
48 
23

592

J R Atkinson received £179,000 for compensation for loss of office during the year.

112 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

113

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6 Directors’ emoluments continued

9 Taxation

Salary 
and fees 
£000 

Benefits 
£000 

Annual 
bonus 
£000 

Pension 
£000 

Total
£000

226 
167 

7 
84 
50 
55 
22 

611 

18 
17 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

35 

– 
– 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

2 
1 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 

3 

246
185

7
84
50
55 
22

649

Year ended 31 December 2019 
Executive Directors 
J R Atkinson1 
J D Saralis 
Non-Executive 
R S Halbert2 
C Brown3 
G D C Kent 
T J M Aspinall 
T J S P Tilleray4 

1. J R Atkinson resigned from the Board on 7 September 2020.

2. R S Halbert resigned from the Board on 30 January 2019.

3. C Brown resigned from the Board on 8 October 2020.

4. S Tilleray was appointed to the Board on 19 July 2019.

5. Brian Phillips was appointed to the Board on 25 June 2020. 

The Group contributed £4,000 to pension schemes in respect of Directors during the year (2019: £3,000). 
The emoluments of the highest paid Director were £353,000 (2019: £246,000).

Key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing 
and controlling the activities of the Group. Key management personnel include members of the leadership 
team who are not statutory directors in addition to the main Board. Disclosure of transactions with key 
management is detailed in note 28.

7 Financial income

Bank interest income 
Other income1 

2020 
£000 

10 
158 

168 

1 Other income relates to financing income on debtors and accrued income expected to be settled within greater than 12 months.

8 Financial expense

Interest on bank loans 
Amortisation of facility arrangement fees 
Interest on lease liabilities 

2020 
£000 

469 
88 
28 

585 

2019
£000

9
193

202

2019
£000

529
77
9

615

Recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income

Current tax expense
Current tax on income for the year 
Adjustments in respect of prior years 

Total current tax 

Deferred tax credit 
Origination and reversal of timing differences 

Total deferred tax 

Tax expense in statement of comprehensive income 

Total tax charge 

Reconciliation of effective tax rate

Loss for the year 
Total tax expense 

Loss before taxation 

2020 
£000 

202 
26 

228 

(226) 

(226) 

2 

2 

2020 
£000 

(225) 
2 

(223) 

2019
£000

883
(121)

762

(127).

(127)

635

635

2019
£000

(2,959)
635

(2,324)

Tax using the UK corporation tax rate of 19.00% (2019: 19.00%)  

(42) 

(441)

Non-deductible expenses 
Adjustments in respect of prior years 
Share scheme deductions 
Short-term timing differences for which no deferred tax is recognised 

Total tax charge 

100 
26 
(11) 
(71) 

2 

1,189
(121)
–
8

635

Changes in tax rates and factors affecting the future tax charge
The UK Government announced in the 2021 budget that from 1 April 2023, the rate of corporation tax in the 
United Kingdom will increase from 19% to 25%. This was not substantively enacted at the reporting date 
and so the effects are not included within these financial statements. 

114 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

115

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10 Deferred tax asset

12 Acquisitions and disposals

At beginning of year 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income (see note 9)   
Reclassified to liability 

Deferred tax asset at end of year 

2020 
£000 

30 
(16) 
– 

14 

The asset for deferred taxation consists of the tax effect of temporary differences in respect of:

At 1 January 2019 
Reclassified to deferred tax liability 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income 

At 31 December 2019 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income (see note 9) 

At 31 December 2020 

11 Deferred tax liability

At beginning of year 
Reclassified from deferred tax assets 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income (see note 9) 

Deferred tax liability at end of year 

Property, 
plant & 
equipment 
£000 

Bad debt 
provision 
£000 

12 
(7) 
12 

17 
(3) 

14 

165 
– 
(152) 

13 
(13) 

– 

  2020 
  £000 

 1,068 
– 
  (242) 

  826 

The liability for deferred taxation consists of the tax effect of temporary differences in respect of:

At 1 January 2019 
Reclassified from deferred tax asset 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income 

At 31 December 2019 
Recognised in statement of comprehensive income 

At 31 December 2020 

Property, 
plant & equipment 
£000 

– 
(7) 
37 

30 
8 

38 

Intangible  
assets 
acquired on 
 business  
combinations 
£000 

1,342 
– 
(304) 

1,038 
(250) 

788 

826

2019
£000

177
(140)
(7)

30

Total
£000

177
(7)
(140)

30
(16)

14

2019
£000

1,342
(7)
(267)

1,068

Total
£000

1,342 
(7)
(267)

1,068
(242)

During 2019 the Group incorporated a new wholly-owned subsidiary, National Conveyancing Partners 
Limited which began trading in 2020. There were no acquisition costs involved. 

In 2019 the Group acquired an interest in Law Together LLP through the election of its 100% subsidiary, 
Project Jupiter Limited, as a member of the LLP. Member capital of £50,000 was advanced to Law Together 
LLP. There were no other acquisition costs involved.

On 2 January 2020 the Group terminated its partnership in respect of National Law Associates LLP and 
relinquished its interest for nil consideration, recognising neither a profit or loss on disposal. 

13 Goodwill

Cost
At 1 January 2019 
At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2020 

Impairment 
At 1 January 2019 
Recognised in the year 
At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2020 

Net book value 
At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2020 

Personal 
Injury 
£000 

39,897 
39,897 

39,897 

– 
– 
– 

– 

Critical 
Care 
£000 

Residential 
Property 
£000 

15,592 
15,592 

15,592 

4,873 
4,873 

4,873 

Total
£000

60,362
60,362

60,362

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 
(4,873) 
(4,873) 

(4,873) 

– 
(4,873)
(4,873)

(4,873)

39,897 

39,897 

15,592 

15,592 

– 

– 

55,489

55,489

In 2019, in light of the losses incurred by the Residential Property CGU and the continued uncertainty in the 
market,  the directors undertook an impairment review by considering the CGU’s value in use compared to 
its recoverable amount and concluded that there were insufficient cash flows to support the recoverable 
value of goodwill attributable to the Residential Property CGU.  As such, an impairment loss of £4,873,000 
was recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in 2019.

Where goodwill arose as part of a business acquisition, it forms part of the CGU’s asset carrying value which 
is tested for impairment annually. The Group has determined that for the purposes of impairment testing, 
each segment being Personal Injury, Critical Care and Residential Property, is the appropriate level at which 
to test, as this represents the lowest level at which the goodwill is monitored for internal management 
reporting.

The recoverable amounts for the CGUs are based on value in use which is calculated on the operating 
cash flows expected to be generated by the division using the latest budget data for the coming year and 
extrapolated at a forecast growth rate for five years. These cash flows are discounted at a WACC of 8.4% for 
Critical Care (2019: 7.4%) and 9.3% (2019: 8.4%) for Personal Injury. The range of WACCs represents the 
different risk profiles of each CGU.

We include a terminal value within each forecast which represents the cash flows of the CGU into perpetuity 
with 0% growth assumed, as permitted under IAS36 Impairment of Assets.

Management has determined that the recoverable amount calculations are most sensitive to changes in 
the assumptions of the discount rates, growth rates used to extrapolate the cash flows beyond the budget 
period and operating cash flows.

116 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

117

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13 Goodwill continued

The operating profit compound annual growth rate assumptions for years one to five are as follows: 

The balances owed to the non-controlling members’ of these LLPs at the end of the year and movements 
during the year are as follows:

Personal Injury 
Critical Care 

2020 

49.8% 
14.5% 

2019

16.6%
9.0%

The key factor influencing the Personal Injury 
growth assumptions is the long business cycle 
of  National Accident Law. A high proportion of 
profits generated from 2021 onwards relate to the 
settlement of claims first converted by National 
Accident Law in previous years. These forecasts 
are based on detailed financial models using 
assumptions such as lead to enquiry conversion, 
claim underway rate, claims win rate and average 
settlement values. These assumptions are based 
on the company’s  knowledge and experience on 
how cases settle gained from prior experience. 

A growth rate that is higher than the long-term UK 
average growth rate of c. 2% has been applied to 
the Critical Care CGU. This is based on the recent, 
pre-COVID trading performance of the division over 
the past three years, the anticipated recovery from 
COVID and takes into account the strategic plans 
for the division over the coming years.

The operating profits have been adjusted for 
working capital movements to arrive at the 
operating cashflows. These working capital 
movements have been based on historic trends 
and adjusted for changes in the business model in 
Personal Injury.

Management have performed sensitivity analysis 
on the key assumptions (WACC, growth rate, 
operating cash flows) and have determined that 
there is ample headroom under the value in use 
calculation to determine that no significant changes 
to key assumptions would affect the overall 
judgement as to whether the CGU is impaired. 
The impairment calculations are most sensitive to 
changes in assumptions regarding the cash flow 
forecasts and WACC. If the WACC were to increase 
by 25% the following decreases in cash flows 
would be needed in order to reduce the available 
headroom to nil:

Personal Injury – 4.4% 

Critical Care – 54.8%

14 Non-controlling interests

The Group has the following investments in non-wholly owned subsidiaries:

Name of subsidiary 

Your Law LLP 
Law Together LLP 

Country of incorporation 
and principal place 
of business 

Nature of interest 

Principal activity 

2020 

2019

United Kingdom 
United Kingdom 

LLP member 
LLP member 

Personal injury lawyers 
Personal injury lawyers 

75% 
50% 

75%
50%

Ownership

The ownership percentage is based on the proportion of capital contribution advanced by each of the 
corporate members. Profit share allocations and control are not determined by reference to this ownership 
percentage. The Group, through its 100% owned subsidiary Project Jupiter Limited, is entitled to appoint 
60% of the members to the Management Board of each LLP. Profit and net assets are shared between 
members based on the provisions of the partnership agreements.

Balance at start of the year 
Profit allocation for the year 
Disposal of interest in LLP 
Drawings paid  
Capital advances 

Balance at the end of the year 

  2020 
  £000 

  3,315 
  4,115 
(54) 
 (3,199) 

– 

  4,177 

2019
£000

947
4,474
–

(2,156)
50

3,315

15 Other Intangible assets

Technology  Contract 
related 
£000 

related 
£000 

Brand 
names  Software 
£000 

£000 

Assets 
under 
construction 
£000 

Total
£000

Cost 
At 1 January 2020 
Additions 
Reclassifications 

At 31 December 2020 

Amortisation and impairment 
At 1 January 2020 
Amortisation charge for the year 
Amortisation charge on business combinations 

At 31 December 2020 

Net book value 
At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2020 

167 
– 
– 

8,466 
– 
– 

885 
– 
– 

1,815 
633 
7 

167  8,466 

885  2,455 

37 
187 
(7) 

11,370
820
–

217 

12,190

167 
– 
– 

4,381 
– 
825 

740 
– 
99 

1,000 
421 
– 

167 

5,206 

839 

1,421 

– 
– 
– 

– 

6,288
421
924

7,633

– 

4,085 

145 

815 

–  3,260 

46 

1,034 

37 

217 

5,082

4,557

118 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

119

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15 Other Intangible assets continued

Technology  Contract 
related 
£000 

related 
£000 

Brand 
names  Software 
£000 

£000 

Assets 
under 
construction 
£000 

Total
£000

Cost 
At 1 January 2019 
Additions 
Reclassifications 

At 31 December 2019 

Amortisation 
At 1 January 2019 
Amortisation charge for the year 
Amortisation charge on business combinations 
Impairment charge on business combinations 

167 
– 
– 

8,466 
– 
– 

167  8,466 

82 
– 
20 
65 

3,440 
– 
841 
100 

885 
– 
– 

885 

641 
– 
99 
– 

1,222 
426 
167 

1,815 

344 
372 
– 
284 

At 31 December 2019 

167 

4,381 

740 

1,000 

167 
37 
(167) 

37 

10,907
463
–

11,370

– 
– 
– 
– 

– 

4,507
372
960 
449

6,288

Net book value 
At 31 December 2018 

At 31 December 2019 

85 

5,026 

–  4,085 

244 

145 

878 

815 

167 

37 

6,400

5,082

In the statement of comprehensive income, the amortisation charge on business combinations and the 
amortisation charge for the year (on other assets) is included within ‘operating expenses’.

16 Property, plant and equipment

Cost 
At 1 January 2020  
Additions 
Disposals 

At 31 December 2020 

Depreciation and impairment 
At 1 January 2020 
Depreciation charge for the year 

At 31 December 2020 

Net book value 
At 31 December 2019 

At 31 December 2020 

Fixtures & fittings
 &total
£000

1,936
269
–

2,205

1,669
169

1,838

267

367

Cost 
At 1 January 2019  
Additions 

At 31 December 2019 

Depreciation and impairment 
At 1 January 2019 
Depreciation charge for the year 

At 31 December 2019 

Net book value 
At 31 December 2018 

At 31 December 2019 

17 Leases

This note provides information for leases where the Group is a lessee. 

Amounts recognised in the balance sheet

Right of use assets 
Buildings 
Office equipment 

Lease liabilities 
Current 
Non-current 

2020 
£000 

2,699 
62 

2,761 

2020 
£000 

248 
2,195 

Additions to right of use assets of £2,801,000 (2019: £136,000) were made during the year.

The statement of comprehensive income includes the following amounts relating to leases: 

Depreciation charge of right of use assets 
Buildings 
Office equipment 

Interest expense 
Expenses relating to leases of low value assets 

The total cash outflow for leases in 2020 was £558,00 (2019: £465,000). 

2020 
£000 

404 
26 

430 

28 
– 

120 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

Fixtures &
fittings &
total
£000

1,717
219

1,936

1,522
147

1,669

195

267

2019
£000

180
84

264

2019
£000

187
60

2019
£000

395
24

419

9
–

121

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18 Trade and other receivables

20 Trade and other payables

Trade receivables: receivable in less than one year 
Trade receivables: receivable in more than one year 
Accrued income: receivable in less than one year 
Accrued income: receivable in more than one year 
Other receivables 
Prepayments 
Corporation tax 
Recoverable disbursements 

2020 
£000 

7,493 
799 
11,398 
7,029 
14 
703 
88 
6,761 

34,285 

2019
£000

9,556
648
11,205
7,631
1,045
1,144
103
6,539

37,871

A provision against trade receivables and accrued income of £673,000 (2019: £554,000) is included in the 
figures above.

19 Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings

This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s other interest-bearing loans and 
borrowings, which are measured at amortised cost. For more information about the Group’s exposure to 
interest rate risk, see note 24.

Non-current liabilities 
Revolving credit facility 
Less facility arrangement fees 

Total other interest-bearing loans and borrowings 

2020 
£000 

2019
£000

20,000 
(99) 

19,901 

23,750
(156)

23,594

The revolving credit facility is secured by a fixed and floating charge over the assets of the Group.

Terms and debt repayment schedule

Currency 

Year of 
Nominal interest rate  maturity 

Fair 
value 
2020 
£000 

Carrying 
amount 
2020 
£000 

Fair 
value 
2019 
£000 

Carrying
amount
2019
£000

Bank loan1 

GBP 

1.25%–1.75% above Libor  2022 

19,901 

19,901 

23,594 

23,594

19,901 

19,901 

23,594 

23,594

1. The company renewed its banking facilities in September 2017 by taking out a revolving credit facility of £25,000,000 and repaying the 
outstanding term loan at that date of £9,375,000. The facility was extended in July 2020 and this facility is now due to terminate on 31 December 
2022. Interest is payable at between 1.25%– 1.75% above LIBOR per annum.

Amounts due within one year: 

Trade payables 
Disbursements payable 
Other taxation and social security 
Other payables, accruals and deferred revenue 
Customer deposits 

Total trade and other payables 

21 Share capital 

Number of shares 
Opening: ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 
Issued during the year 

Closing: ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 

Allotted, called up and fully paid 
Opening: 46,178,716 (2019: 46,178,716) ‘A’ 
Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 
Issued during the year: 61,506 ‘A’ Ordinary shares of £0.0025 each 

Closing: 46,240,222 ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 

Shares classified in equity 
Opening shares classified in equity 
Issued during the year 

Closing balance 

2020 
£000 

3,201 
6,001 
1,791 
5,849 
705 

17,547 

2019
£000

3,935
5,835
835
5,742
869

17,216

2020 

2019

46,178,716 
61,506 

46,178,716
–

46,240,222 

46,178,716

£000 

£000

115 
– 

115 

115 
– 

115 

115
–

115

115
–

115

The holders of ’A’ Ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share at the meetings of the Company and to 
dividends as declared in proportion to the amounts paid up on the ordinary shares.

22 Share based payments

The Group operates three employee share plans as follows:

SAYE plan
Options may be satisfied by newly issued Ordinary Shares, or by the transfer of Ordinary Shares held in 
treasury. The SAYE scheme is open to all employees of the Group. The scheme runs over three years with 
employees choosing to save between £0 – £500 per month, the proceeds of which can then be used to 
purchase the shares under option.

EMI Scheme
Options may be granted as tax-favoured enterprise management incentive options (EMI Options) or non- 
tax favoured Options. The EMI Plan provides for the grant, to selected employees of the Group, of rights to 
acquire (whether by subscription or market purchase) Ordinary Shares in the Company (Options).

122 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

123

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22 Share based payments continued

Nominal Cost LTIP
The nominal cost LTIP will enable selected employees (including Executive Directors) to be granted awards 
in respect of Ordinary Shares. Awards may be granted in the form of nil or nominal cost options to acquire 
Ordinary Shares; or contingent rights to receive Ordinary Shares. Awards may be satisfied by newly issued 
Ordinary Shares, or by the transfer of Ordinary Shares held in treasury.

The terms and conditions of grants of share options to employees of the Group, in the shares of NAHL 
Group plc are as follows:

Grant date/employees entitled/
nature of scheme

Number of 
instruments

Vesting conditions

583,331 ordinary 
shares

Performance-
based

EMI Equity-settled award to 6 
employees granted by the parent 
company on 11 December 2014

SAYE Equity-settled award to 49 
employees granted by the parent 
company on 23 October 2018

EMI Equity-settled award to 11 
employees granted by the parent 
company on 18 April 2019

240,713 ordinary 
shares

Performance-
based

1 December 2021

750,298 ordinary 
shares

Performance-
based

Vesting period and 
maximum life of 
options

Third anniversary of 
Date of Grant

On determination 
of performance 
criteria (as soon as 
practicable after 31 
December 2021)

Third anniversary of 
Date of Grant

EMI Equity-settled award to 1 
employee granted by the parent 
company on 18 April 2019

48,780 ordinary 
shares

Performance-
based

The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options are as follows

Outstanding at the beginning of the year 
Granted during the year 
Cancelled during the year 
Lapsed during the year 
Vested during the year 
Forfeited during the year 

Outstanding at the end of the year 
Exercisable at the end of the year  
Exercised during the year 

2020 

2019

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
£ 

0.23 
– 
(0.86) 
(0.0025) 
(1.21) 
(0.22) 

0.20 
1.92 
0.0025 

Number of 
options 
No. 

2,040,920 
– 
(143,830) 
(530,868) 
(65,160) 
(261,271) 

1,039,791 
648,491 
61,506 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
£ 

0.30 
0.0025 
– 
(0.0025) 
(0.0025) 
(0.42) 

0.23 
1.81 
– 

Number of
options
No.

1,826,738
818,980
–
(368,112)
(61,506)
(175,180)

2,040,920
644,837 
–

A charge of £523,000 (2019: £811,000) has been made through the statement of comprehensive income 
in the current year in relation to the IFRS 2 share option charge. The weighted average share price of those 
shares exercised during the year was £0.0025 (2019: not applicable). For shares outstanding at the year 
end, these are exercisable at a range of exercise prices of between £0.0025–£0.86 and have a weighted 
average remaining life of 363 days. 

There were no share options issued in 2020. The fair value of each employee share option issued prior to 
2020 has been measured using the Black-Scholes formula where an expected volatility of 65.0% has been 
used as well as a risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds) of between 0.5%–0.9%. The weighted 
average share price used in the model is £1.23 and a dividend yield of between 7.0%–7.2% has been 
assumed. Service and non- market performance conditions attached to the arrangements were not taken 
into account in measuring fair value.

Expected volatility has been based on evaluation of historical volatility of the Company’s share price, 
particularly over the historical period commensurate with the expected term. The expected term of the 
instruments has been based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour.

23 Earnings per share

The calculation of basic earnings per share at 31 December 2020 is based on loss attributable to ordinary 
shareholders of the parent company of £(225,000) (2019: loss £2,959,000) and a weighted average 
number of Ordinary Shares outstanding of 46,238,878 (2019: 46,178,716).

Loss attributable to ordinary shareholders
£000 

Loss for the year attributable to the shareholders 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares 

2020 

(225) 

2019

(2,959)

Number 

Issued Ordinary Shares at 1 January 

Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares at 31 December 

Note 

21 

2020 

2019

46,178,716 

46,178,716

46,238,878 

46,178,716

Basic Earnings per share (p)

Group 

2020 

(0.5) 

2019

(6.4)

In line with IAS 33, as the Group has a negative earnings per share, it is assumed that there are no dilutive 
shares.

Diluted Earnings per share (p)

Group 

2020 

(0.5) 

2019

(6.4)

124 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

125

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24 Financial instruments

(a) Fair values of financial instruments
The Group’s principal financial instruments comprise interest-bearing borrowings, cash and short-term 
deposits. The main purpose of these financial instruments is to raise finance for the Group’s operations. 
The Group has various other financial instruments such as trade and other receivables and trade and other 
payables that arise directly from its operations.

The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are credit risk, liquidity risk and market risk 
(specifically interest rate risk). The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and 
they are summarised below. There have been no substantive changes in the Group’s exposure to financial 
instrument risks or its objectives, policies and processes for managing and measuring those risks during the 
periods in this report unless otherwise stated.

The fair values of all financial assets and financial liabilities by class, which approximate to their carrying 
values, shown in the balance sheet are as follows:

Financial assets measured at amortised cost 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Disbursements (note 18) 

Total financial assets 

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings (note 19) 
Lease liabilities (note 17) 
Trade payables (note 20) 
Disbursements payable (note 20) 
Other payables and accruals (note 20) 

Carrying 
amount 
2020 
£000 

3,609 
21,288 
6,761 

31,658 

19,901 
2,443 
3,201 
6,001 
5,849 

Fair 
value 
2020 
£000 

3,609 
21,288 
6,761 

31,658 

19,901 
2,443 
3,201 
6,001 
5,849 

Total financial liabilities measured at amortised cost 

37,396 

37,396 

Carrying 
amount 
2019 
£000 

2,564 
25,951 
6,539 

35,054 

23,594 
247 
3,935 
5,835 
5,742 

39,353 

Fair
value
2019
£000

2,564
25,951
6,539

35,054

23,594 
247
3,935
5,835
5,742

39,353

(b) Credit risk
Financial risk management
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument 
fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers.

Exposure to credit risk
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the balance sheet date by class of financial instrument was:

Trade receivables 
Accrued income 

2020 
£000 

8,292 
12,981 

21,319 

2019
£000

10,204
14,702

24,906

Management consider the credit risk to be mitigated as a result of a) the holding of deposits for all 
significant panel law firm customers and b) only offering significant deferred terms to those panel law firms 
with whom we hold strategic partnerships and after satisfactory credit checks have been obtained. As at 
31 December 2020 these deposits reflect 8.5% (2019: 8.6%) of the balance of trade receivables. At each 
balance sheet date, the amount of deposit held was:

Customer deposits 

2020 
£000 

705 

2019
£000

869

Credit quality of financial assets and impairment losses 
The aging of trade receivables at the balance sheet date was: 

Not past due 
Past due (1 – 30 days) 
Past due (30 – 120 days) 
Past due (Over 120 days) 

Gross: 

Gross: 
Standard  Deferred 

Terms 
2020 
£000 

Terms  Impairment 
2020 
2020 
£000 
£000 

Gross: 
  Standard 
Terms 
2019 
£000 

Total 
2020 
£000 

2,441 
986   
926  
2,431  

1,683 
43 
45 
222 

(100)  4,024    3,362 
545 
1,003  
835 
945 
1,438 
(333)  2,320 

(26) 
(26) 

Gross: 
Deferred 
Terms 
2019 
£000 

3,994 
168 
105 
67 

Impairment 
2019 
£000  

Total
2019
£000

(34)  7,322
701
(12) 
898
(42) 
1,283
(222) 

6,784 

1,993 

(485)  8,292     6,180 

4,334 

(310)  10,204

The Group offers standard credit terms of between 30–60 days to the majority of its customers. Deferred 
terms of between 12–24 months are offered to those panel law firms or customers with whom we hold 
strategic partnerships. 

36.2% of standard terms trade receivables are 120 days or more past due (2019: 23.3%). These receivables 
arise primarily in Critical Care and Your Law where our standard credit terms are 30 days. Increasing cost 
pressures on solicitors mean they often do not settle these balances until interim funds are available or a 
case has settled. This is often within 12 months and, therefore, formal deferred terms are not utilised. We 
monitor these debts closely through regular contact with these solicitors and do not consider there to be any 
significant risks regarding recoverability.

Accrued income balances of £12,981,000 (2019: 14,702,000) represent amounts contractually due from 
customers that have not yet been invoiced but where there is a contractual obligation to settle funds once 
they become due. All accrued income of this nature is granted on extended credit terms of up to 36 months 
and none is yet due for payment.

The movement in the allowance for impairment in respect of trade receivables and accrued incom during the 
year was as follows:

Balance at 1 January 
Allowance released 
Allowance utilised 

Balance at 31 December 

2020 
£000 

554 
119 
– 

673 

2019
£000

909
(203)
(152)

554

The allowance account for trade receivables is used to record impairment losses unless the Group 
is satisfied that no recovery of the amount owing is possible; at that point the amounts considered 
irrecoverable are written off against the trade receivables directly.

126 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

127

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24 Financial instruments continued

(c) Liquidity risk
Financial risk management
Liquidity risk arises from the Group’s management of working capital and the finance charges on its debt 
instruments and repayments of principal. It is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting 
its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity 
of funding and flexibility through the use of its revolving credit facility to ensure that it will always have 
sufficient cash to allow it to meet its liabilities when they become due.

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and 
excluding the effects of netting agreements:

2020 

Carrying amount 
Contractual cash flows: 
1 year or less 
1 to 2 years 
2 to 5 years 
5 years or more 

2019 

Carrying amount 
Contractual cash flows: 
1 year or less 
1 to 2 years 
2 to 5 years 

Secured 
bank loans 
£000 

Lease 
liabilities  
£000 

Trade and 
other 
payables 
£000 

Total
£000

(20,000) 

(2,443) 

(16,843) 

(39,286)

(400) 
(20,400) 
– 
– 

(20,800) 

(287) 
(295) 
(853) 
(1,306) 

(2,741) 

(10,842) 
(6,001) 
– 
– 

(11,529)
(26,696)
(853)
(1,306)

(16,843) 

(40,384)

Secured 
bank loans 
£000 

Lease 
liabilities  
£000 

Trade and 
other 
payables 
£000 

Total
£000

(23,750) 

(247) 

(16,347) 

(40,344)

(570) 
(24,320) 
– 

(24,890) 

(188) 
(61) 
– 

(249) 

(10,512) 
(5,835) 
– 

(11,270)
(30,216)
–

(16,347) 

(41,486)

(d) Market risk
Financial risk management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and 
equity prices will affect the Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments.

Market risk – foreign currency risk

The Group has no foreign currency risk as all transactions are in Sterling. 

Market risk – interest rate risk

Profile
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk from its use of interest-bearing financial instruments. This is a 
market risk that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in interest 
rates.

At the balance sheet dates, the only interest-bearing financial asset is cash. Cash is held to meet liabilities as 
they fall due and is not held for investment purposes, therefore there is not considered to be an interest rate 
risk associated with cash.

Variable rate instruments 
Financial liabilities 

Total interest-bearing financial instruments 

2020 
£000 

2019
£000

20,000 

20,000 

23,750

23,750

The Group manages the interest rate risk arising from its financial liabilities by monitoring its interest rates 
and the general market and consulting with its bankers to find the best way to mitigate any movements if it 
anticipates any significant changes to interest rates.

Sensitivity analysis
A change of 0.5% in interest rates at the balance sheet date would increase/(decrease) profit or loss in 
the following year by the amounts shown below. This calculation assumes that the change occurred at the 
balance sheet date and had been applied to risk exposures existing at that date.

This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant and considers the effect of financial 
instruments with variable interest rates. The analysis is performed on the same basis for the comparative 
periods.

Profit for the year 
Increase 
Decrease 

2020 
£000 

100 
(100) 

2019
£000

119
(119)

Market risk – equity price risk 
The Group does not have an exposure to equity price risk as it holds no investment in equity securities which 
are classified as fair value through profit or loss or other comprehensive income.

(e) Capital management
Group
The Group’s objectives when maintaining capital are to safeguard the entity’s ability to continue as a going 
concern and to provide an adequate return to shareholders. Capital comprises the Group’s equity, i.e. 
share capital including preference shares, share premium, own shares and retained earnings, as well as 
bank loans. The Group’s debt/equity ratio as at 31 December 2020 is 0.3:1.0 (2019: 0.4:1.0). The balance 
of the Group’s capital as at 31 December 2020 was £80,239,000 comprising equity of £60,239,000 and 
bank loans of £20,000,000. The Group is subject to quarterly covenant testing against its bank loans. 
These covenants include minimum EBITDA and minimum free cash flow. The Group adhered to both these 
covenants in 2020 and is forecasting compliance for the foreseeable future. 

25 Commitments 

Capital commitments
At 31 December 2020 the Group had capital commitments of £nil (2019: £261,000).

128 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

129

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26 Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity

Exercise of share options
During the year 61,506 share options were exercised which resulted in the issue of 61,506 new Ordinary 
Shares with a par value of £0.0025. The exercising of these options raised funds of £154 for the Group. 

There were no transactions with owners recorded directly in equity in 2019.

27 Dividends

No dividends were paid in 2020. On 31 May 2019 the Group paid final dividends in respect of 2018 of 
£2,631,000 which represented a dividend per share of 5.7p. On 31 October 2019 the Group paid interim 
dividends in respect of 2019 of £1,201,000 which represented a dividend per share of 2.6p. The Directors 
did not recommend a final dividend in respect of 2019.

28 Related parties

Transactions with key management personnel

Key management personnel in situ at the 31 December 2020 and their immediate relatives control 0.3% 
(2019: 1.6%) of the voting shares of the Company.

Key management personnel are considered to be the Directors of the Company as well as those of National 
Accident Law Limited, Fitzalan Partners Limited, Bush & Company Rehabilitation Limited and any other 
management serving as part of the executive team. Detailed below is the total value of transactions with 
these individuals.

Short-term employment benefits 
Termination benefits 

29 Net debt   

2020 
£000 

1,897 
179 

2,076 

2019
£000

2,032
–

2,032

Net debt includes cash and cash equivalents and other interest-bearing loans and borrowings.

Cash and cash equivalents 
Other interest-bearing loans and borrowings 

Net debt 

Lease liabilities 

2020 
£000 

3,609 
(19,901) 

(16,292) 

2019
£000

2,564
(23,594)

(21,030)

(2,443) 

(247)

Set out below is a reconciliation of movements in net debt during the period.

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Net inflow from increase in debt and debt financing 

Movement in net borrowings resulting from cash flows 
Non-cash movements – net (release of)/increase to prepaid loan 
arrangement fees 
Net debt at beginning of period 

Net debt at end of period 

2020 
£000 

1,045 
3,750 

4,795 

(57) 
(21,030) 

(16,292) 

Set out below is a reconciliation of movements in lease liabilities arising from financing activities:

Net outflow from decrease in lease liabilities 

Movement in lease liabilities resulting from cash flows 
Non-cash movements arising from initial recognition of new 
lease liabilities, revisions and interest charges 
Non-cash movements arising from initial recognition on adoption of IFRS 16 
Lease liabilities at beginning of period 

Lease liabilities at end of period 

2020 
£000 

558 

558 

(2,754) 

– 
(247) 

(2,443) 

2019
£000

966
(6,500)

(5,534)

28
(15,524)

(21,030)

2019
£000

465

465

(39)
(673)
–

(247)

30 Prior period adjustments

During the year, the Group undertook a review of its accounting treatment and presentation of several 
significant items. The result of this was that the following adjustments have been made to the presentation 
of gross profit, underlying profit and balances previously identified as non-controlling interests:

1. As part of the restructure of its Consumer Legal Services division in the year ended 31 December 2020 
the Group reclassified the costs of its call centre and lead triage operations from administrative expenses 
to cost of sales.  The Directors believe this better reflects the nature of the costs and the operations of the 
respective businesses.  Accordingly, cost of sales, gross profit and administrative expenses for 2019 have 
been restated to reflect the reallocation of these costs on the same basis to allow for greater comparability 
year on year.

2. The Group undertook a review of its non-underlying items. In line with best practice, the Group has 
decided that the IFRS 2 share based payment charge and amortisation of intangible assets arising on 
business combinations will now be presented within operating profit rather than as non-underlying items. 
This change will result in greater comparability of the Group results with other listed entities. 

3. During the year the Group undertook a review of its contracts in relation to its ABS LLP  law firms. As part 
of this review, it identified that member capital, previously accounted for as equity under IAS 32, met the 
definition of a financial liability rather than as an equity instrument under this standard. Given the materiality 
of these balances, in line with IAS 8, the Group has restated the 2019 financial statements as a result of 
this. The impact of this adjustment is that balances previously accounted for as non-controlling interests 
within equity have been reclassified to financial liabilities within the statement of financial position. This has 
reduced the Group’s net assets by £3,315,000 as at 31 December 2019. There is no impact on the overall 
profit and total comprehensive income attributable to the owners of the company but the profit attributable 
to non-controlling interests has now been reclassified as an expense in the statement of comprehensive 
income in line with treatment of income and returns on financial liabilities under IAS 32, rather than shown 
as an allocation of profits to a non-controlling interest.

130 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

131

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 Prior period adjustments continued

The impact of these adjustments on the financial statements is as follows:

COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AT 31 DECEMBER 2020

Adjustment 1 
£000 

Adjustment 2 
£000 

Adjustment 3 
£000 

Impact on consolidated statement  
of comprehensive income 
Revenue 
Cost of sales 

Gross profit 

Administrative expenses 

Underlying operating profit 
Share-based payments 
Amortisation of intangible assets  
acquired on business combinations 
Exceptional items 

Operating profit 
Profit attributable to non-controlling  
interest members in LLPs 
Financial income 
Financial expense 

Profit/(loss) before tax 
Taxation 

2019 as 
previously 
reported 
£000 

51,314 
(24,990) 

26,324 

(23,761) 

12,192 
(811) 

(960) 
(7,858) 

2,563 

– 
202 
(615) 

2,150 
(635) 

Profit/(loss) and total comprehensive  
income for the year 

1,515 

Profit and total comprehensive  
income is attributable to: 
Owners of the company 
Non-controlling interests 

Impact on statement of  
financial position 
Member capital and current  
accounts (financial liability) 
Total current liabilities 
Total liabilities 

Net assets 

(2,959) 
4,474 

1,515 

– 
(17,766) 
(42,488) 

59,079 

Capital and reserves attributable  
to non-controlling interests 

3,315 

– 
(2,043) 

(2,043) 

2,043 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

(1,771) 
811 

960 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 
– 

– 

– 

2019 as
restated
£000

51,314
(27,033)

24,281

21,718

10,421
–

–
(7,858)

2,563

(4,474)
202
(615)

(2,324)
(635)

Non-current assets 
Investments 

Current assets 
Trade and other receivables 

Net assets 

Equity 
Share capital 
Share option reserve 
Share premium 
Retained earnings at end of year 

Shareholders’ funds 

Note 

2020 
£000 

2019
£000

2 

3 

5 

52,700 

52,700

31,933 

84,633 

31,410

84,110

115 
3,912 
14,595 
66,011 

84,633 

115
3,389
14,595
66,011

84,110

The Company profit for the year was £nil (2019: £22,000,000). 

The notes on pages 135–139 form part of these financial statements.

These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 4 June 2021 and were signed on its 
behalf by:

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 
– 

– 

(4,474) 
– 
– 

(4,474) 
– 

(4,474) 

(2,959)

Company registered number: 08996352

J D Saralis 
Director

– 
(4,474) 

(2,959)
–

(4,474) 

(2,959)

(3,315) 
(3,315) 
(3,315) 

(3,315)
(21,081)
(45,803)

(3,315) 

55,764

(3,315) 

–

132 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020

Share 
capital 
£000 

Note 

Share 
option 
reserve 
£000 

Share 
premium 
£000 

Merger 
reserve 
£000 

Retained 
earnings 
£000 

Total
equity
£000

Balance at 1 January 2019 

115 

2,578 

14,595 

– 

47,843  65,131

Total comprehensive income for the year 
Profit for the year 

Total comprehensive income 

Transactions with owners, recorded 
directly in equity 
Share based payments 
Dividends paid 

Balance at 31 December 2019 

Total comprehensive income for the year 

Profit for the year 

Total comprehensive income 

Transactions with owners, recorded 
directly in equity 
Share based payments 
Dividends paid 

7 

7 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

811 
– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

115 

3,389 

14,595 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

523 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

Balance at 31 December 2020 

115 

3,912 

14,595 

– 

22,000  22,000

–  22,000  22,000

– 
– 

– 

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 

811
(3,832)  (3,832)

66,011  84,110

– 

– 

– 

– 
– 

–

–

–

523
–

66,011  84,633

COMPANY CASH FLOW STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2020

Cash flows from operating activities 
Profit for the year 
Adjustments for: 
Share based payments 

Increase in trade and other receivables 

Net cash generated from operating activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 
New share issue 
Dividends paid 

Net cash used in financing activities 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January 

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 

2020 
£000 

2019
£000

– 

22,000

523 

523 
(523) 

– 

– 
– 

– 

– 
– 

– 

811

22,811
(18,979)

3,832

–
(3,832)

(3,832)

–
–

–

NOTES TO THE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1 Accounting policies
Basis of preparation 
Financial Statements

The Financial Statements for the year ended 31 
December 2020 have been prepared in accordance 
with International Accounting Standards in 
conformity with the requirements of the Companies 
Act 2006.

The financial information has been prepared on a 
going concern basis and under the historical cost 
convention. The company has taken advantage 
of the exemption allowed under Section 408 of 
the Companies Act 2006 and has not presented 
its own income statement in these financial 
statements. The Group profit includes a profit 
after tax for the parent company of £nil (2019: 
£22,000,000).

Critical accounting judgements and key 
sources of estimation 
The preparation of financial statements in 
conformity with IFRSs requires management 
to make judgements and estimates that affect 
the application of accounting policies and the 
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and 
expenses. Estimates are based on past experience 
and other reasonable assessment criteria. Actual 
results may differ from these estimates. Estimates 
and underlying assumptions are reviewed on 
an ongoing basis and revisions to accounting 
estimates are recognised in the year in which 
the estimates are revised and in any future years 
affected.

In accordance with IAS 1 the Group is required to 
disclose critical accounting judgements and key 
sources of estimation uncertainty.

Judgements
In applying the Company’s accounting policies, 
management have not made any judgements 
that have a significant impact on the amounts 
recognised in the financial statements.

Estimates
In applying the Company’s accounting policies, 
management have not made any estimates 
that have a significant impact on the amounts 
recognised in the financial statements.

New standards and amendments adopted by 
the Company 
The Company has not adopted any new standards 
or amendments. 

New standards, interpretations and 
amendments not yet effective 
There are no new standards, interpretations and 
amendments that are not yet effective and that 
would be expected to have a material impact on the 
Company in the current or future reporting periods 
and on foreseeable future transactions.

Going concern 
The Company had net assets of 
£84,633,000 (2019: £84,110,000) and 
net current assets of £31,933,000 (2019: 
£31,410,000) as at each year end.

Details of the Directors’ going concern assessment 
for the Group and Company can be found under 
‘Going Concern’ in note 1 to the Group financial 
statements on page 98.

Employee share schemes 
The share option plans allow employees of the 
Group to acquire shares of the Company. The 
fair value of options granted is recognised as an 
employee expense with a corresponding increase in 
equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and 
spread over the period during which the employees 
become unconditionally entitled to the options. The 
fair value of the options granted is measured using 
an option pricing model, taking into account the 
terms and conditions upon which the options were 
granted. The amount recognised as an expense 
is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share 
options that vest except where forfeiture is only 
due to share prices not achieving the threshold 
for vesting. The share-based payment charge 
represents the charge in respect of the employees 
of the Group.

Impairment 
The carrying amounts of the Company’s non- 
financial assets are reviewed at each reporting date 
to determine whether there is any indication of 
impairment. If any such indication exists then the 
asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying 
amount of an asset exceeds its estimated 
recoverable amount. Impairment losses are 
recognised in the income statement. Impairment 
losses recognised in prior periods are assessed

at each reporting date for any indications that 
the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An 
impairment loss is reversed if there has been 
a change in the estimates used to determine 
the recoverable amount. An impairment loss 
is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s 
carrying amount does not exceed the carrying 
amount that would have been determined, 
net of depreciation or amortisation, if no 
impairment loss had been recognised.

134 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

135

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2 Investments

The Company has the following investments in subsidiaries:

Country of 
incorporation 
and principal place 
of business 

Class of 
shares held 

Principal activity 

Ownership

2020 

2019

United Kingdom Ordinary  Holding company 

100% 

100%

United Kingdom Ordinary 

Critical care services 

100% 

100%

United Kingdom Ordinary 
United Kingdom Ordinary  Holding company 
United Kingdom Ordinary  Holding company 

Agency services for solicitors 

100% 
100% 
100% 

100%
100%
100%

Name of subsidiary 

Consumer Champion 
Group Limited2 
Bush & Company 
Rehabilitation Limited2 
Homeward Legal Limited  
(previously Fitzalan  
Partners Ltd)2 
NAH Holdings Limited2 
NAH Group Ltd2 
NAHL Support Services 
Limited2 (previously National  
Accident Helpline Limited) 

United Kingdom Ordinary 

Provision of shared services  
to the Group 

Dormant 
Dormant 

Dormant 
Dormant 

United Kingdom Ordinary 
United Kingdom Ordinary 

United Kingdom Ordinary 
United Kingdom Ordinary 

Lawyers Agency Services 
Limited 
Accident Helpline Limited 
NAH Support Services 
Limited 
Tiger Claims Limited 
National Accident Helpline  
Limited (previously Your  
United Kingdom Ordinary 
Law 1 Limited) 
NAH Legal Services Limited  United Kingdom Ordinary 
Searches UK Limited2 
United Kingdom Ordinary 
United Kingdom Ordinary 
Inside Eye Limited 
Project Jupiter Limited2 
United Kingdom Ordinary  Holding company 
Your Law LLP1 
United Kingdom n/a 
National Accident 
Law Limited2 
Law Together LLP1 
National Conveyancing 
Partners Ltd2 

United Kingdom Ordinary 
United Kingdom n/a 

United Kingdom Ordinary  Outsourcing of staff  

Personal Injury lawyers 
Personal Injury lawyers 

Personal Injury lawyers 

Dormant 
Dormant 
Agency services for solicitors 
Dormant 

100% 

100%

100% 
100% 

100%
100%

100% 
100% 

100%
100%

100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
75% 

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
75%

100% 
50% 

100%
50%

100% 

100%

At 31 December 2020 the value of the investment in Consumer Champion Group Limited, its only directly 
owned subsidiary, was as follows:

Valuation 

At 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 

Total
£000

52,700

The Directors have determined that due to the net assets of NAHL Group plc being in excess of the market 
capitalisation of the Group headed by NAHL Group plc as at 31 December 2020 then an indication of 
impairment exists.

The recoverable amount of the investment has been assessed on a value in use basis using the below 
assumptions behind each valuation technique. A value in use valuation is considered to be appropriate as 
the investment is being held for its long-term profit potential.

Value in use  
On a value in use basis the future cash flows from the investment have been assessed. The future cash flows 
are considered to be the future dividends that could be generated by each CGU (i.e. future retained earnings 
generated by each of the trading subsidiaries) using the latest budget data for the coming year extrapolated 
at an annual growth rate for four years and no growth in perpetuity, discounted at a pre-tax WACC of 9.3%. 
The key assumptions under this basis are the WACC and operating profits of each subsidiary. More details 
on how these have been calculated are given in note 13, Goodwill, to the consolidated financial statements.

Under this basis the carrying value of assets is below the recoverable amount valued on a value in use basis 
and therefore there would be no impairment required.

Sensitivity analysis has been performed that indicates that no reasonable changes to assumptions would 
result in an impairment to the investment.

3 Trade and other receivables

Amounts due from Group undertakings 

2020 
£000 

31,933 

2019
£000

31,410

Amounts due from Group undertakings are interest free and repayable upon demand.

1. Your Law LLP and Law Together LLP are Limited Liability Partnerships. The Group, through its 100% owned subsidiary Project Jupiter Limited, 
is entitled to appoint 60% of the members to the Management Board of each LLP. Profit and net assets are shared between members based on 
the provisions of the partnership agreements.

2. The above 100% subsidiaries have taken the exemption from audit under section 479a of the Companies Act 2006. 

The registered office of all of the above 100% subsidiaries is Bevan House, Kettering Parkway, Kettering, 
Northamptonshire, NN15 6XR.

The registered office of Your Law LLP is Helmont House, Churchill Way, Cardiff, CF10 2HE.

The registered office of Law Together LLP is Castlefield House, Liverpool Road, Manchester, M3 4SB.

136 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

137

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6 Share based payments

The Company operates three employee share plans. Details of these can be 
found in note 22 to the Group accounts.

7 Staff costs and numbers

During the year the Company employed no members of staff and incurred no 
staff costs.

8 Related parties

Details of transactions with key management personnel can be found in note 
28 to the Group accounts.

4 Financial instruments

a) Amounts due from Group undertakings
The fair value of amounts owed by Group undertakings are estimated as the present value of future cash 
flows, discounted at the market rate of interest at the balance sheet date if the effect is material.

Management believes there are no risks arising from these financial instruments on the grounds that the 
amounts are payable on demand and no interest is charged to Group undertakings. The Board reviews 
and agrees policies for managing these risks. There have been no substantive changes in the Company’s 
exposure to financial instrument risks or its objectives, policies and processes for managing and measuring 
those risks during the periods in this report unless otherwise stated.

Carrying 
amount 
2020 
£000 

Fair 
value 
2020 
£000 

Carrying 
amount 
2019 
£000 

Fair
value
2019
£000

Amounts due from Group undertakings 

31,933 

31,933 

31,410 

31,410

Total financial assets 

31,933 

31,933 

31,410 

31,410

b) Capital management
The Company’s objectives when maintaining capital are to safeguard the entity’s ability to continue as a 
going concern and to provide an adequate return to shareholders. Capital comprises the Company’s equity, 
i.e. share capital including preference shares, share premium, own shares and retained earnings. The 
balance of the Company’s capital as at 31 December 2020 was £84,633,000.

5 Share capital

Number of shares 
Opening: ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 
Issued during the year 

Closing: ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 

Allotted, called up and fully paid 
Opening: 46,178,716 (2019: 46,178,716) ‘A’ 
Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 
Issued during the year: 61,506 ‘A’ Ordinary shares of £0.0025 each 

Closing: 46,240,222 ‘A’ Ordinary Shares of £0.0025 each 

Shares classified in equity 
Opening shares classified in equity 
Issued during the year 

Closing balance 

2020 

2019

46,178,716 
61,506 

46,178,716
–

46,240,222 

46,178,716

£000 

£000

115 
– 

115 

115 
– 

115 

115
–

115

115
–

115

The holders of ’A’ Ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share at the meetings of the Company and to 
dividends as declared in proportion to the amounts paid up on the ordinary shares.

138 

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020

NAHL Group Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 

139

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes

CBP007163

NAHL Group Plc has balanced through World Land Trust 
the equivalent of 6kg of carbon dioxide. 

Printed (ISO 14001 compliant) using vegetable inks on 
FSC accredited stock. 

© NAHL Group Plc 2021 

Design and production: Navig8

www.navig8.co.uk

Planning  
for the
future