Team Inc.
Annual Report 2004

Plain-text annual report

Dear Fellow Shareholders, The past year has been exciting and productive for our company. We continue to make further progress with our organic growth initiatives, once again achieving significant improvement in market share, revenues, earnings and profit margins. Team’s net income increased 31% during the past year to the highest level ever. This is a continuation of the consistent progress we have made over the last several years. Our average compound annual growth rate in earn- ings over the past three years and five years has been 27% and 58%, respectively. Consistent with this performance, we were pleased to be recognized in the Fortune Small Business 100 listing of America’s fastest-growing small companies for the third year in a row. We take pride in being one of the highest growth companies in America, regardless of industry. Team took another significant strategic step forward with the recent purchases of Thermal Solutions and the assets of Cooperheat MQS. Together, these two businesses bring Team the #1 market position in both inspection services and field heat treating. As a result of these additions, we expect Team’s total revenues to nearly double over the next twelve months. Beyond the financial benefits, these acquisitions reinforce and support our overall company strategy to capitalize on customer trends to consolidate their industrial service requirements with larger multi-service, multi-location service providers like Team. We also were pleased that our common stock share price nearly doubled over the past year. We believe our continued performance improvement, combined with new initiatives, is attracting the attention of more investors. Despite this price improvement, our trailing P/E ratio remains below overall market averages. We look forward to continued improvement in this area. Operations Highlights For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 17% to $94.5 million. Operating profits for this segment increased 16% to $14.0 million. Overall, the operating profit margin for the year was 15%. The revenues for this segment included $2.5 million in revenues from Thermal Solutions following its acquisition in April 2004. Excluding those revenues, the organic growth from the remainder of the industrial services business was 14% for the full year. The organic growth in the remaining services was broad-based, with double-digit revenue growth in nearly all service lines as a result of continued market penetration with multi-service, multi-plant customer agreements and increased turnaround projects. The Equipment Sales and Rental Business Segment (Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) also had record results for the year. Revenues increased 22% to $13.1 million. Operating profit was $1.2 million, approximately double last year’s results. The strong revenue growth was the result of several major special machine shipments during the second half of the fiscal year. Climax continues to pursue these special machine sales opportunities as a supplement to its standard machine sales and rental offerings. The level of interest in new special machine projects remains high going into the current year. We realize that these results are attributable to a company- wide focus on providing customers with the services and products they need-in a safe, effective, efficient and timely manner. We understand the need to reaffirm the trust and confidence of every customer with each new service or sales opportunity. New Business Acquisitions For the last several years, we have discussed our receptivity to “accelerating” strategic acquisitions, provided they were consistent with our current industrial services strategy and accretive to earnings. In the span of about six months, we completed two purchases that dramatically enhance the profile and outlook for our company. In April 2004, Team completed the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc., the second largest provider of field heat treating services in North America. In August 2004, Team purchased the assets of Cooperheat MQS from a bankruptcy proceeding. Cooperheat MQS is the largest provider of both field heat treating and inspection services in North America. Strategically, both businesses are a great complement to our company. As a result of these acquisitions, Team has entered one new service line, field heat treating, as the industry leader. At the same time, we have substantially expanded our inspection capability from a company with a regional Gulf Coast presence to the market leader with a national presence. Further, both businesses have management and service personnel joining Team that represent an excellent fit with our company. Both of these service lines are solid additions to our multi-service, multi-plant arrangements with many major customers. Financially, we expect service line margins and overall business profitability for these new businesses to reach levels that are on par with Team’s other service lines. Yet, Team was able to purchase these two businesses for a total value of about .5 times revenue, compared to Team’s valuation of about 1.2 times revenue. Obviously, when we can achieve the performance consistent with the expectations above, there should be significant value enhancement opportunity for Team. Financial Results For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004, revenues were $107.7 million, up 17% from the prior year. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) increased 26% to $9.7 million. EBIT profit margin improved to 9%. Net income was $5.8 million ($0.69 per share fully diluted), up 31%. Net income profit margin improved to 5.4% for the year. The incremental operating margins (growth in EBIT as a percentage of growth in revenue) for the business, after adjustments for the Thermal Solutions acquisition and other non-cash, non-operating items, was about 18%, reflecting the continuing operating leverage of our business. The high incremental profit margin is a key measure of our ability to continue to achieve profit growth that outpaces revenue growth. Profit margins will continue to receive close scrutiny and focus from all of our managers. Our balance sheet remains strong. At fiscal year end, total stockholders’equity had increased nearly $11 million from the prior year to $42 million. Total debt increased to about $19 million, reflecting the Thermal Solutions acquisition in April 2004. The company’s debt to EBITDA ratio at year-end was about 1.4. Because of this strength in the balance sheet, we were able to fully finance the August 2004 purchase of the assets of Cooperheat-MQS with a new $75 million senior debt facility. After giving effect to the $35 million purchase price and related financing cost, our debt level increased to $56 million and our debt to EBITDA ratio increased to a still comfortable 2.5. * * * Exciting challenges lie ahead in the current year, as we merge the new businesses into the Team family and continue our organic growth initiatives. We appreciate your continuing interest in and support of our company. We are proud of our company, our achievements and the outstanding efforts of our 2000 fellow employees. It is our privilege to be associated with this great team. We all look forward to continued success and improvement in the coming year. Philip J. Hawk Chairman and CEO Kenneth M. Tholan President and COO Dear Fellow Shareholders, The past year has been exciting and productive for our company. We continue to make further progress with our organic growth initiatives, once again achieving significant improvement in market share, revenues, earnings and profit margins. Team’s net income increased 31% during the past year to the highest level ever. This is a continuation of the consistent progress we have made over the last several years. Our average compound annual growth rate in earn- ings over the past three years and five years has been 27% and 58%, respectively. Consistent with this performance, we were pleased to be recognized in the Fortune Small Business 100 listing of America’s fastest-growing small companies for the third year in a row. We take pride in being one of the highest growth companies in America, regardless of industry. Team took another significant strategic step forward with the recent purchases of Thermal Solutions and the assets of Cooperheat MQS. Together, these two businesses bring Team the #1 market position in both inspection services and field heat treating. As a result of these additions, we expect Team’s total revenues to nearly double over the next twelve months. Beyond the financial benefits, these acquisitions reinforce and support our overall company strategy to capitalize on customer trends to consolidate their industrial service requirements with larger multi-service, multi-location service providers like Team. We also were pleased that our common stock share price nearly doubled over the past year. We believe our continued performance improvement, combined with new initiatives, is attracting the attention of more investors. Despite this price improvement, our trailing P/E ratio remains below overall market averages. We look forward to continued improvement in this area. Operations Highlights For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 17% to $94.5 million. Operating profits for this segment increased 16% to $14.0 million. Overall, the operating profit margin for the year was 15%. The revenues for this segment included $2.5 million in revenues from Thermal Solutions following its acquisition in April 2004. Excluding those revenues, the organic growth from the remainder of the industrial services business was 14% for the full year. The organic growth in the remaining services was broad-based, with double-digit revenue growth in nearly all service lines as a result of continued market penetration with multi-service, multi-plant customer agreements and increased turnaround projects. The Equipment Sales and Rental Business Segment (Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) also had record results for the year. Revenues increased 22% to $13.1 million. Operating profit was $1.2 million, approximately double last year’s results. The strong revenue growth was the result of several major special machine shipments during the second half of the fiscal year. Climax continues to pursue these special machine sales opportunities as a supplement to its standard machine sales and rental offerings. The level of interest in new special machine projects remains high going into the current year. We realize that these results are attributable to a company- wide focus on providing customers with the services and products they need-in a safe, effective, efficient and timely manner. We understand the need to reaffirm the trust and confidence of every customer with each new service or sales opportunity. New Business Acquisitions For the last several years, we have discussed our receptivity to “accelerating” strategic acquisitions, provided they were consistent with our current industrial services strategy and accretive to earnings. In the span of about six months, we completed two purchases that dramatically enhance the profile and outlook for our company. In April 2004, Team completed the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc., the second largest provider of field heat treating services in North America. In August 2004, Team purchased the assets of Cooperheat MQS from a bankruptcy proceeding. Cooperheat MQS is the largest provider of both field heat treating and inspection services in North America. Strategically, both businesses are a great complement to our company. As a result of these acquisitions, Team has entered one new service line, field heat treating, as the industry leader. At the same time, we have substantially expanded our inspection capability from a company with a regional Gulf Coast presence to the market leader with a national presence. Further, both businesses have management and service personnel joining Team that represent an excellent fit with our company. Both of these service lines are solid additions to our multi-service, multi-plant arrangements with many major customers. Financially, we expect service line margins and overall business profitability for these new businesses to reach levels that are on par with Team’s other service lines. Yet, Team was able to purchase these two businesses for a total value of about .5 times revenue, compared to Team’s valuation of about 1.2 times revenue. Obviously, when we can achieve the performance consistent with the expectations above, there should be significant value enhancement opportunity for Team. Financial Results For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004, revenues were $107.7 million, up 17% from the prior year. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) increased 26% to $9.7 million. EBIT profit margin improved to 9%. Net income was $5.8 million ($0.69 per share fully diluted), up 31%. Net income profit margin improved to 5.4% for the year. The incremental operating margins (growth in EBIT as a percentage of growth in revenue) for the business, after adjustments for the Thermal Solutions acquisition and other non-cash, non-operating items, was about 18%, reflecting the continuing operating leverage of our business. The high incremental profit margin is a key measure of our ability to continue to achieve profit growth that outpaces revenue growth. Profit margins will continue to receive close scrutiny and focus from all of our managers. Our balance sheet remains strong. At fiscal year end, total stockholders’equity had increased nearly $11 million from the prior year to $42 million. Total debt increased to about $19 million, reflecting the Thermal Solutions acquisition in April 2004. The company’s debt to EBITDA ratio at year-end was about 1.4. Because of this strength in the balance sheet, we were able to fully finance the August 2004 purchase of the assets of Cooperheat-MQS with a new $75 million senior debt facility. After giving effect to the $35 million purchase price and related financing cost, our debt level increased to $56 million and our debt to EBITDA ratio increased to a still comfortable 2.5. * * * Exciting challenges lie ahead in the current year, as we merge the new businesses into the Team family and continue our organic growth initiatives. We appreciate your continuing interest in and support of our company. We are proud of our company, our achievements and the outstanding efforts of our 2000 fellow employees. It is our privilege to be associated with this great team. We all look forward to continued success and improvement in the coming year. Philip J. Hawk Chairman and CEO Kenneth M. Tholan President and COO UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20549 È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE FORM 10-K SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 0-9950 TEAM, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TEXAS (State of incorporation) 200 Hermann Drive, Alvin, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) 74-1765729 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 77511 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 331-6154 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each Class Name of Each Exchange on which Registered Common Stock, $.30 par value American Stock Exchange, Inc. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES È NO ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. È Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ‘ No È As of August 13, 2004, 8,084,025 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding, of which 5,850,453 were held by non-affiliates. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sales price of $14.43 per share on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. on such date) was $84,422,037. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Part III. Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Team, Inc. to be held September 23, 2004. FORM 10-K INDEX PART I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2. Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 3. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART II Item 5. Market for Team’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 6. Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive and Other Officers of Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11. Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV Page 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 41 ITEM 1. BUSINESS (a) General Description of Business PART I Team, Inc. (“Team” or the “Company”), incorporated in 1973, is a professional full service provider of fugitive emissions control specialized industrial services including on-stream leak repair, hot monitoring, field machining, treating and non destructive technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat testing/examination (“NDT-NDE”) inspection services. These services are provided throughout the United States in approximately 40 locations. All references to Team or the Company are intended to include its operating subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated. tapping, The Company conducts operations through international locations in Singapore, Aruba, Canada, Trinidad and Singapore. Additionally, the Company licenses its proprietary leak repair and hot tapping techniques and materials to various companies outside the United States and receives a royalty based upon revenues earned by the licensee. Team’s industrial service offerings have been significantly expanded through two recent acquisitions: 1) in April 2004, the Company acquired Thermal Solutions, Inc. (“Thermal”) a $15 million Denver, Colorado based field heat treating service company, and 2) in August 2004, Team acquired the business assets of Cooperheat-MQS, Inc., (“Cooperheat”) a Houston, Texas based company with two service offerings—field heat treating and NDT inspection services. At the time of the acquisition, Cooperheat was operating under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and is generally believed to have been the number one or number two leading service provider in each of its service lines. Annual revenues for Cooperheat are expected to be approximately $80 million. Additionally, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc. (“Climax”) of Newberg, Oregon, the Company is engaged in a separate business segment—equipment sales and rental. Climax is a leading designer-manufacturer of portable, metal cutting machine tools used for on-site industrial maintenance. The Climax acquisition provided the support for the Company’s offering of on-site field machining services beginning in February of 1999. (b) Financial Information about Segments See Note 12 to accompanying financial statements for financial information about business segments. (c) Narrative Description of Business The Company operates in two reportable revenue generating segments—1) industrial services and 2) equipment sales and rental. Industrial services consist principally of leak repair, hot tapping, emissions control monitoring, on-site field machining, technical bolting, valve repair, heat treating and NDT inspection. The equipment sales and rentals segment is comprised of the Climax business. The following table sets forth the revenues (in thousands) from each segment in the three years ended May 31: Segment 2004 2003 2002 Industrial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Sales and Rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 94,546 13,123 $81,122 10,754 $74,513 10,568 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $107,669 $91,876 $85,081 Industrial Services The Company provides industrial services for over 2,000 customers in the petrochemical, refining, power, pipeline, pulp and paper, steel and other industries. Services include leak repair, hot tapping, fugitive emissions monitoring, and, more recently, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat treating and NDT inspection. 1 Leak Repair Services. The Company is the leader in the industry in providing on-stream repairs of leaks in piping systems and related equipment. In conjunction with its leak repair services, the Company markets a line of products, which includes both standard and custom-designed clamps and enclosures for plant systems and pipelines. The Company’s leak repair services consist of on-stream repairs of leaks in pipes, valves, flanges and other parts of piping systems and related equipment primarily in the chemical, refining and utility industries. The Company uses specially developed techniques, sealants and equipment for repairs. Many of the Company’s repairs are furnished as interim measures which allow plant systems to continue operating until more permanent repairs can be made during scheduled plant shutdowns. The Company’s leak repair services involve inspection of the leak by the Company’s field crew who record pertinent information about the faulty part of the system and transmit the information to the Company’s engineering department for determination of appropriate repair techniques. Repair materials such as clamps and enclosures are custom designed and manufactured at the Company’s facility in Alvin, Texas and delivered to the job site. The Company maintains an inventory of raw materials and semi-finished clamps and enclosures to reduce the time required to manufacture the finished product. Installations of the clamps and enclosures for on-stream repair work are then performed by the field crew using, in large part, materials and sealants that are developed and produced by the Company. The Company’s manufacturing center has earned the international ISO-9001 certification for its engineering design and manufacturing operations. ISO-9001 is the most stringent of all ISO-9000 certification programs. The Company’s non-destructive repair methods do not compromise the integrity of its customer’s process system and can be performed in temperatures ranging from cryogenic to 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit and with pressures from vacuum to 6,000 pounds per square inch. The Company’s proprietary sealants are specifically formulated to repair leaks involving over 300 different kinds of chemicals. Management attributes the success of its leak repair services to the quality and timely performance of its services by its highly skilled technicians, its proprietary techniques and materials and its ability to repair leaks without shutting down the customer’s operating system. On-stream repairs can prevent a customer’s continued loss of energy or process materials through leaks, thereby avoiding costly energy and production losses that accompany equipment shutdowns, and also lessen emissions escaping into the atmosphere. The Company has continued to develop different types of standard and custom-designed clamps, enclosures and other repair products, which complement the Company’s existing industrial market for leak repair services. The Company’s leak repair services are supported by an in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control program that monitors the design and manufacture of each product to assure material traceability on critical jobs and to ensure compliance with customers’ requirements. Hot Tapping Services. The Company’s hot tapping services consist primarily of hot tapping and Line-stop® services. Hot tapping services involve utilizing special equipment to cut a hole in an on-stream, pressurized pipeline so that a new line can be connected onto the existing line without interrupting operations. Hot tapping is frequently used for making branch connections into piping systems while the production process is operative. Line-stop® services permit the line to be depressurized downstream so that maintenance work can be performed on the piping system. The Company typically performs these services by mechanically drilling and cutting into the pipeline and installing a device to stop the process flow. The Company also utilizes a line freezing procedure when applicable to stop the process flow using special equipment and techniques. Emissions Control Services. The Company also provides leak detection services that include fugitive emissions identification, monitoring, data management and reporting services primarily for the chemical, refining and natural gas processing industries. These services are designed to monitor and record emissions from specific process equipment components as requested by the customer, typically to assist the customer in establishing an ongoing maintenance program and/or complying with present and/or future environmental regulations. The Company prepares standard reports in conjunction with EPA requirements or can custom-design these reports to its customers’ specifications. 2 Field Machining and Technical Bolting Services. This service involves the use of portable machining equipment (manufactured by Climax, as well as third party vendors) to repair or modify in-place machinery, equipment, vessels and piping systems not easily removed from a permanent location. As opposed to the conventional machining process where the work piece rotates and the cutting tool is fixed, in field machining, the work piece remains fixed and the cutting tool rotates. Other common descriptions for this service are on-site or in-place machining. Field machining services include flange facing, pipe cutting, line boring, journal turning, drilling, and milling. Technical bolting services are often provided to our customers as an adjunct to field machining during turnaround or maintenance activities. These services involve the use of hydraulic or pneumatic equipment with bolt tightening techniques to achieve reliable and leak-free connections and also include bolt disassembly using hot bolting or nut splitting techniques. Field machining and technical bolting services are offered to the Company’s existing customer base through its extensive branch operations. Field machining is an off-stream operation performed during piping isolations, shutdowns, or plant turnarounds. Inspection Services. Inspection services consist of the testing and evaluation of piping, piping components and equipment to determine the present condition and predict remaining operability. The Company’s inspection services use all the common methods of non-destructive testing, including radiography, ultrasound, magnetic particle and dye penetrate, as well as, higher end robotic and newly developed ultrasonic systems. The Company provides these services as part of planned construction and maintenance programs and on demand as the situation dictates, and provides reports based on interpretation in accordance to industry and national standards. Inspection services are marketed to the same industrial customer base as other Team services and to the pipeline industry. There are a large number of companies offering NDT-NDE inspection services, with no single company having a significant share of the overall market. This service offering has been significantly expanded with the acquisition of the assets of Cooperheat in August 2004. With this acquisition, Team believes it is now the largest NDT-NDE inspection service provider in the United States. Field Valve Repair Services. In the spring of 2003, the Company launched Field Valve Repair Services as an adjunct to its field machining services. Through this offering, the Company performs on-site repairs to process and control valves, as well as providing preventive maintenance programs and valve data management programs. The targeted customers for these services are generally the same as for our field machining and technical bolting services. Field Heat Treating Services. In April 2004, the Company commenced field heat treating services through the acquisition of Thermal, a privately-held company based in Denver, Colorado. These services, which include electric resistance and gas-fired combustion, are primarily utilized by industrial users to cure coatings, expand metal parts for assembly or disassembly, remove moisture from components and to provide preheat and post- weld heat treatments to relieve metal stresses. At the time of the acquisition, Thermal was the second largest provider of heat treatment services in the United States. With the acquisition of the business assets of Cooperheat in August 2004, the Company believes it is now clearly the predominant field heat treating service provider in the United States. Marketing and Customers. Team’s industrial repair services are marketed principally by personnel based at the Company’s approximate 40 locations. Team has developed a cross-marketing program to utilize its sales personnel in offering many of the Company’s services at its operating locations. Management believes that these operating and office locations are situated to facilitate timely response to customer needs, which is an important feature of its services. No customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated Company revenues during any of the last three fiscal years. Generally, customers are billed on a time and materials basis although some work may be performed pursuant to a fixed-price bid. Emission control services may also be billed based on the number of components to purchase orders issued under written customer monitored. Services are usually performed pursuant 3 agreements. While some purchase orders provide for the performance of a single job, others provide for services to be performed for a term of one year or less. In addition, Team is a party to certain long-term contracts, which are enabling agreements only. Substantially all such agreements may be terminated by either party on short notice. The agreements generally specify the range of services to be performed and the hourly rates for labor. While contracts have traditionally been entered into for specific plants or locations, the Company has recently entered into multiple regional or national contracts, which cover multiple plants or locations. The Company’s industrial services are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. The Company typically provides various limited warranties for certain of its repair services. To date, there have been no significant warranty claims filed against the Company. Business Risks. While the Company’s management is optimistic about Team’s future, maintaining and expanding customer relationships and service volumes are key elements of the Company’s strategy. Weakness in the markets served by the Company could constrain demand. Although the Company has a diversified customer base, a substantial portion of its business is dependent upon the chemical and refining industry sectors. Competitive initiatives and/or poor service performance could also reduce the strength and breadth of current customer relationships and preference for the Company. Although management believes sufficient qualified personnel are available in most areas, no assurance can be made that such personnel will be available when needed. Competition. Competition in the Company’s industrial services is primarily on the basis of service, quality, timeliness, and price. In general, competition stems from other outside service contractors and customers’ in-house maintenance departments. Management believes Team has a competitive advantage over most service contractors due to the quality, training and experience of its technicians, its nationwide service capability, and due to the broad range of services provided, as well as its technical support and manufacturing capabilities supporting the service network. There are two other service contractors who provide a similar range of service and broad geographical coverage as the Company. Other principal competitors are primarily single-location or single-service companies that compete within a certain geographical area. Equipment Sales and Rentals The Equipment Sales and Rentals business is comprised solely of the Climax subsidiary, a leading design- manufacturer of portable machine tools located in Newburg, Oregon. Climax’s standard tools offering consists of boring bars, pipe beveling tools, key mills, portable flange facers, and portable lathes. These tools are sold to end users in the utilities, refining, marine, heavy construction, and extractive industries, or to other service providers and contractors. In addition, Climax designs and manufactures customized machining tools for on-site machine repair, manufacturing, fabrication and construction applications. Climax’s design and manufacturing operations are conducted in a 30,000 square feet facility in Newberg, Oregon. Climax uses state of the art equipment in its manufacturing process and maintains an inventory of raw materials, parts and completed machines as needed to support the current level of business. Most of the Company’s orders for equipment are filled within 30 days of receipt. The Company believes that there are a limited number of original equipment manufacturers that compete with Climax and that it has a market share of approximately 10%. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of Climax revenues during any of the last three fiscal years. General Employees. As of May 31, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 988 employees in its operations. The Company’s employees are not unionized. There have been no employee work stoppages to date, and management believes its relations with its employees are good. The acquisition of Cooperheat in August 2004 has approximately doubled the number of employees of the Company. 4 Insurance. The Company carries insurance it believes to be appropriate for the businesses in which it is engaged. Under its insurance policies, the Company has per occurrence self-insured retention limits of $50,000 for general liability, and $250,000 for automobile liability and workers’ compensation in most states. The Company has obtained fully insured layers of coverage above such self-retention limits. Since its inception, the Company has not been the subject of any significant liability claims not covered by insurance arising from the furnishing of its services or products to customers. However, because of the nature of the Company’s business, there exists the risk that in the future such liability claims could be asserted which might not be covered by insurance. One such potential claim was asserted in 2004 wherein the Company’s general liability insurance carrier has disputed the existence of coverage and is providing a defense on behalf of the Company subject to a reservation of rights. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, below. Regulation. Substantially all of the Company’s business activities are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations. These regulations are administered by various federal, state and local health and safety and environmental agencies and authorities, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) of the U.S. Department of Labor and the EPA. The Company’s training programs are required to meet certain OSHA standards. Expenditures relating to such regulations are made in the normal course of the Company’s business and are neither material nor place the Company at any competitive disadvantage. The Company does not currently expect to expend material amounts for compliance with such laws during the ensuing two fiscal years. From time-to-time in the operation of its environmental consulting and engineering services, the assets of which were sold in 1996, the Company handled small quantities of certain hazardous wastes or other substances generated by its customers. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (the “Superfund Act”), the EPA is authorized to take administrative and judicial action to either cause parties who are responsible under the Superfund Act for cleaning up any unauthorized release of hazardous substances to do so, or to clean up such hazardous substances and to seek reimbursement of the costs thereof from the responsible parties, who are jointly and severally liable for such costs under the Superfund Act. The EPA may also bring suit for treble damages from responsible parties who unreasonably refuse to voluntarily participate in such a clean up or funding thereof. Responsible parties include anyone who owns or operates the facility where the release occurred (either currently and/or at the time such hazardous substances were disposed of), or who by contract arranges for disposal, treatment, or transportation for disposal or treatment of a hazardous substance, or who accepts hazardous substances for transport to disposal or treatment facilities selected by such person from which there is a release. Management believes that its risk of liability is minimized since its handling consisted solely of maintaining and storing small samples of materials for laboratory analysis that are classified as hazardous. The Company does not currently carry insurance to cover liabilities which the Company may incur under the Superfund Act or similar environmental statutes due to its prohibitive costs. Patents. While the Company is the holder of various patents, trademarks, and licenses, the Company does not consider any individual property to be material to its consolidated business operations. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Team and its subsidiaries own real estate and office facilities in the Alvin, Texas area totaling approximately 88,000 square feet of floor space. These facilities are comprised of a corporate office and training building and a manufacturing facility for clamps, enclosures and sealants. The Company also owns real estate and facilities in Newburg, Oregon, which is the manufacturing facility and corporate office of Climax. All of those facilities are pledged as security for the Company’s credit facility. (See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.) The Company and its subsidiaries also lease 56 office and/or plant and shop facilities at separate locations in 23 states and in Singapore, Aruba, Trinidad and Canada. The Company believes that its property and equipment, as well as that of its subsidiaries, are adequate for its current needs, although additional investments are expected to be made in additional property and equipment for 5 expansion, replacement of assets at the end of their useful lives and in connection with corporate development activities. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding lease obligations on these properties. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In December 2001, the Company and 18 other defendants were sued in a lawsuit styled Lyondell Chemical Company and Atlantic Richfield Company v. Ethyl Corporation et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. In April and May of 2004, the District Court granted motions for summary judgment filed by the Company and dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice with respect to claims against Team allegedly arising out of its ownership of the stock of French Limited and of Allstate Vacuum and Tanks, Inc (“Allstate”). The Company has reason to believe that the Plaintiffs will appeal the Court’s ruling in favor of the Company at the end of the case. This lawsuit arises out of a previous lawsuit filed by the United States of America against the Plaintiffs, Lyondell and Arco Chemical, alleging that hazardous substances and/or pollutants or contaminants were deposited at the Turtle Bayou Site in Liberty County, Texas. Arco and Lyondell entered into a settlement with the United States which was embodied in a Consent Decree. Within three years after the Consent Decree was entered, Arco and Lyondell brought the referenced suit against approximately 18 parties seeking contribution for the costs of response for removal and/or remedial action at the Turtle Bayou Site. The co-defendants include, among others, Exxon-Mobil, El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Company, Du Pont, Ethyl Corporation, and Lubrizol. Later, El Paso added approximately nine additional defendants. Plaintiffs allege that French Ltd., a vacuum truck company that the Company owned from 1978 to 1984, or its former parent, French Limited of Houston, Inc., had, during the time period of 1969 to 1976, transported hazardous substances to the Turtle Bayou Site. In 1982, as a result of the contentions made by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Company informed George Whitten, the one who had sold French, Ltd. to the Company, that his failure to reveal French, Ltd.’s activities with respect to the illegal depositing of hazardous substances was a breach of the representations and warranties of the agreement by which the Company acquired French, Ltd. In November 1984, the Company sold French back to Whitten. The Plaintiffs alleged that French, Ltd. and, therefore, the Company, should be held liable for French Limited and/or French Limited of Houston, Inc.’s allegedly wrongful deposits of some of the material that was deposited at the Site. Plaintiffs also allege that the Company should be held liable for some alleged disposal of hazardous waste by another former Company subsidiary, Allstate. In addition to the claims originally put forward by the Plaintiffs, nine of the Defendants have filed cross- claims against the Company in which they contended they do not believe they should be held liable on Plaintiffs’ claims against them, but that if they are held liable then they seek contribution from the Company and other defendants. In addition, four of those same nine defendants which are related to the El Paso Corporation (the “El Paso Defendants”) seek contribution against the Company and others on a related claim by the United States Government on another location within the Turtle Bayou Site at which hazardous wastes were disposed. All defendants except the El Paso Defendants have agreed orally to dismiss their cross-claims against the Company subject to revival if the Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgments granted by the District Court. It appears that the El Paso defendants and the Company are close to an agreement with respect to a motion to dismiss similar to the one proposed with the other defendants; if the Company is not successful in reaching such an agreement, then the Company plans to file a motion for summary judgment requesting that the District Court apply its previously granted summary judgments against the El Paso Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it in this matter are without merit, as is supported by the rulings of the District Court. 6 In April 2003, Team and three other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit styled Diamond Shamrock Refining Company, L.P. v. Cecorp, Inc. et al in the 148th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas. The suit seeks recovery for $40 million in property damages from an explosion and fire originating at a valve which the Company’s personnel were attempting to seal in order to prevent a leak. Liability is being contested and other parties appear to have primary responsibility for the fire and explosion. The Company believes it is insured against this loss with both primary and excess liability insurance, subject to any applicable deductible. However, coverage from the $1 million primary policy is disputed and a defense is being provided by the carrier subject to a reservation of rights. In June 2004, Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation made demand on Team Industrial Services, Inc. for indemnity from claims asserted against Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation in Linda Alapisco, et al v. Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation, et al, Cause No. L-030085, in the 156th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas. This suit seeks unspecified damages for the 250 individuals identified in the petition for injuries resulting from alleged exposure to toxic chemicals released as a result of the explosion and fire at the Diamond Shamrock facility. This demand has been turned over to the general liability insurance carrier for a response. As of the date of this report, the carrier has not responded to the claim. The Company’s umbrella policy has limits of coverage of $25,000,000 and should be more than sufficient to provide the Company a defense and indemnity as to all claims asserted. The Company and certain subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits and are subject to various claims and proceedings encountered in the normal conduct of business. In the opinion of management, any uninsured losses that might arise from these lawsuits and proceedings will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. 7 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR TEAM’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS (a) Market Information Team’s common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. under the symbol “TMI”. The table below reflects the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock on the American Stock Exchange by fiscal quarter for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Sales Price High Low Fiscal 2004 Quarter Ended: August 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8.35 10.48 11.48 16.05 $ 7.50 7.90 9.75 11.10 Fiscal 2003 Quarter Ended: August 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.25 8.75 8.20 7.80 $ 7.40 7.40 7.00 5.00 (b) Holders There were 282 holders of record of Team’s common stock as of August 13, 2004, excluding beneficial owners of stock held in street name. Although exact information is unavailable, the Company estimates there are approximately 1,750 additional beneficial owners based upon information gathered in connection with proxy solicitation. (c) Dividends No dividends were declared or paid in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002. Pursuant to the Company’s Credit Agreement, the Company may not pay dividends without the consent of its primary lender. Additionally, future dividend payments will continue to depend on Team’s financial condition, market conditions and other matters deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. (d) Stock Repurchase Plan In fiscal 2004, the Company repurchased 50,000 shares of its outstanding common stock on the open market at a weighted average price of $7.89 per share. As of May 31, 2004, the Company is authorized by its Board of Directors and lender to expend up to an additional $1.7 million on open market repurchases. 8 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following is a summary of certain consolidated financial information regarding the Company for the five years ended May 31, 2004 (amounts in thousands, except per share data): Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $107,669 $91,876 $85,081 $75,643 $66,636 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per share: basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net Income per share: diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 5,776 $ 4,402 $ 3,909 $ 2,740 $ 1,471 0.75 0.69 $ $ 0.57 0.53 $ $ 0.51 0.48 $ $ 0.34 0.34 $ $ 0.18 0.18 Weighted average shares outstanding: basic . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares outstanding: diluted . . . . . . . . . . . 7,709 8,429 7,707 8,369 7,664 8,229 8,015 8,122 8,238 8,283 Cash dividend declared, per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Balance Sheet data: Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities . . . . . . Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Working capital $ 74,396 $ 18,308 $ 42,299 $ 27,712 $52,224 $10,567 $31,735 $19,713 2004 2003 May 31, 2002 $51,189 $13,454 $28,182 $18,693 2001 2000 $47,996 $15,188 $24,812 $16,801 $48,384 $17,515 $23,137 $14,909 9 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003 Revenues in 2004 were $107.7 million compared to $91.9 million in 2003, an increase of 17.2%. Operating profits (earnings before interest and taxes, or “EBIT”) were $9.7 million in 2004 versus $7.7 million in 2003, an increase of 25.8%. The following sets forth the components of revenue and operating profits for fiscal 2004 and 2003: 2004 2003 $ % Increase Revenues: Total Industrial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Sales & Rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 94,546,000 13,123,000 $81,122,000 10,754,000 $13,424,000 2,369,000 Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $107,669,000 $91,876,000 $15,793,000 16.5% 22.0% 17.2% Operating Profit: Industrial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Sales & Rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,953,000 1,220,000 (5,432,000) $12,012,000 603,000 (4,871,000) $ 1,941,000 617,000 (561,000) 16.2% 102.3% 11.5% Total Operating Profit (EBIT) . . . . . . . $ 9,741,000 $ 7,744,000 $ 1,997,000 25.8% For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 16.5% to $94.5 million. Segment operating profit increased 16.2% to $14.0 million. A significant contributor to revenue growth in industrial services in 2004 came from the full year impact of a new service line, field valve repair, which was introduced in the spring of 2003. This service line contributed $4.5 million of the 2004 growth, primarily associated with two major turnaround projects in the summer and fall of 2004. The segment also benefited from new and expanded fugitive emissions monitoring contracts in the West Coast region of the United States and from turnaround activity in the Gulf Coast and the Caribbean. Additionally, the acquisition of Thermal Solutions in April 2004 contributed $2.5 million to industrial services revenue, however, due to the seasonality of field heat treating, it did not contribute to 2004 operating profit for the industrial services segment. The only service line that did not experience revenue growth during the year was NDT inspection, which was down $1.8 million year over year, due to continued softness in pipeline construction activities. Management believes that demand for the Company’s traditional services is, generally, a function of the population of high-temperature, high-pressure piping systems. Demand is also somewhat related, especially for leak repair and hot tapping, to the operating performance of our customers—particularly in the refining, pipeline, and petrochemical industries. Generally, as those customers’ margins improve, more funds are expended for the specialized industrial services offered by the Company. The Equipment Sales and Rental Business segment (encompassing Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) grew revenues 22% for the year to $13.1 million—the highest revenue year in the history of Climax. Revenue growth for the year was primarily attributable to the shipment of special tool orders in the third and fourth quarters aggregating over $2 million. Operating profit increased 102% to $1.2 million versus $603 thousand in 2003. Included in operating profit in 2004 is a $235,000 gain from the sale of idle real estate. That is offset by a charge to other expense of $245,000 for estimated losses pertaining to a sales tax matter. A similar charge of $150,000 was recorded in 2003. Climax is domiciled in the state of Oregon, which is a state that imposes no tax on sales originating there. In fiscal 2003, management determined that Climax does have an obligation to collect and remit sales taxes in certain other jurisdictions, which it had not previously done. Climax is nearing completion of a process of entering into agreements with several states with respect to sales tax 10 obligations and collecting amounts due from its customers. The cumulative $395,000 charge represents management’s best current estimate of the probable loss that Climax will incur with respect to this matter. The ultimate outcome is subject to a great deal of variables and cannot be determined with a certainty. With regard to consolidated operating results, overall gross margins were 39.6% of revenues in fiscal 2004 as compared to 40.5% in fiscal 2003. The decline primarily reflects the downturn in NDT Inspection revenues associated with pipeline and pulp & paper customer segments as well as lower profit margins from the Thermal Solutions revenues due to slow seasonal activity in the two months after the acquisition. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $3.4 million in 2004 versus 2003, an increase of 11.7%. The overall increase in SGA reflects significant increases in incentive compensation, safety training and legal expenses over the prior year. In spite of these elements of cost increase, as a percentage of revenue, SG&A was down—30.3% of revenues in fiscal 2004 versus 31.8% of revenues in fiscal 2003. Non-cash compensation expense increased by $229,000 in 2004 versus 2003 due to the achievement of a stock-price hurdle of $10.50 per share, which resulted in the vesting of 66,667 options held by the chief executive officer and the recognition of the unamortized compensation expense associated with these options. Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002 The following sets forth the components of revenue and operating profits for fiscal 2003 and 2002: 2003 2002 $ % Increase Revenues: Industrial Services: Traditional services . . . . . . . . . . . . . Newer services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Industrial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Sales & Rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $56,933,000 24,189,000 $81,122,000 10,754,000 $51,036,000 23,477,000 $74,513,000 10,568,000 $5,897,000 712,000 $6,609,000 186,000 Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $91,876,000 $85,081,000 $6,795,000 Operating Profit: Industrial Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment Sales & Rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,012,000 603,000 (4,871,000) $11,470,000 547,000 (4,779,000) $ 542,000 56,000 (92,000) Total Operating Profit (EBIT) . . . . . . . . . $ 7,744,000 $ 7,238,000 $ 506,000 11.6% 3.0% 8.9% 1.8% 8.0% 4.7% 10.2% 1.9% 7.0% For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 8.9% to $81.1 million. Segment operating profit increased 4.7% to $12.0 million. All major service lines except NDT inspection services experienced growth during the year. NDT inspection revenues were down slightly due to significantly reduced pipeline and pulp & paper projects, which were nearly offset by continued growth in plant inspection services. A significant contributor to the growth in traditional service lines came from new multi-service, multi-location contracts that commenced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Management believes that demand for the Company’s traditional services is, generally, a function of the population of high-temperature, high-pressure piping systems. Demand is also somewhat related, especially for leak repair and hot tapping, to the operating performance of our customers—particularly in the refining, pipeline, and petrochemical industries. Generally, as those customers’ margins improve, more funds are expended for the specialized industrial services offered by the Company. The Equipment Sales and Rental Business segment (encompassing Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) grew revenues about 2% for the year to $10.8 million. The market for capital equipment continues to 11 be depressed in most of the world markets. Revenue growth in Asia offset flat to slightly depressed sales in the U.S. and Europe. Operating profit increased 10% to $603,000 versus $547,000 in 2002. In 2003, Climax provided a $150,000 charge to other expense for estimated losses pertaining to a sales tax matter. Climax is domiciled in the state of Oregon, which is a state that imposes no tax on sales originating there. In fiscal 2003, management determined that Climax had an obligation to collect and remit sales taxes in certain other jurisdictions, which it had not previously done. Climax is in the process of entering into agreements with several states with respect to sales tax obligations and is in the process of collecting amounts due from its customers. The $150,000 charge recorded in 2003 represents management’s best estimate at that time of the probable loss that Climax would incur with respect to this matter. With regard to consolidated operating results, overall gross margins were 40.5% of revenues in fiscal 2003 as compared to 41.7% in fiscal 2002. The decline primarily reflects the downturn in NDT Inspection revenues associated with pipeline and pulp & paper customer segments as well as lower product margins at Climax due to an increase in lower margin international sales coupled with a strong margin comparison in fiscal 2002 due to a $700 thousand special order in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $1.8 million in 2003 versus 2002, an increase of 6.5%. The overall increase in SGA reflects a ramp-up of business development personnel in the industrial service segment ahead of related revenue growth and an increasing level of insurance and legal costs in fiscal 2003. In spite of these elements of cost increase, as a percentage of revenue, SG&A was down—31.8% of revenues in fiscal 2003 versus 32.5% of revenues in fiscal 2002. Liquidity and Capital Resources At May 31, 2004, the Company’s liquid working capital (cash and accounts receivable, less current liabilities) totaled $16.3 million, an increase of $7.4 million since May 31, 2003. The Company utilizes excess operating funds to automatically reduce the amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility. At May 31, 2004, the outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility was $14.0 million and approximately $6.3 million was available to borrow under the facility. During fiscal 2004, the Company increased its total outstanding debt by $7.5 million as a result of the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc. In fiscal 2004, the Company also expended $395,000 to reacquire an additional 50,000 shares of its common stock on the open market pursuant to a stock repurchase plan. In the opinion of management, the Company currently has sufficient funds and adequate financial sources available to meet its anticipated liquidity needs. Management believes that cash flows from operations, cash balances and available borrowings will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to finance anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and debt service requirements. At May 31, 2004, the Company had a $34 million bank credit facility that consisted of: (i) a $22,500,000 revolving loan, which matures September 30, 2005, (ii) $9,500,000 in term loans and (iii) a $2,000,000 mortgage loan. Amounts borrowed against the term loans are due in quarterly installments in the amount of $339,000 until the loans mature on September 30, 2005. Amounts borrowed against the mortgage loan are repaid in quarterly installments of $31,000 until its maturity date of September 30, 2008. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a marginal rate over either the LIBOR rate or the prime rate. At May 31, 2004, the Company’s marginal rate was 1.5% over the LIBOR rate. The weighted average rate on outstanding borrowings at May 31, 2004 is approximately 3.1%. The Company also pays a commitment fee of .25% per annum on the average amount of the unused availability under the revolving loan. Loans under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The terms of the agreement require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and limit investments, liens, leases and indebtedness, and dividends, among other things. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all credit facility covenants. 12 At May 31, 2004, the Company was contingently liable for $2.2 million in outstanding stand-by letters of credit and, at that date, approximately $6.3 million was available to borrow under the credit facility. On August 11, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of the business asset of Cooperheat-MQS, Inc. (see note 15 to the Consolidated financial statements), the existing credit facility was replaced with a new $75 million facility. The new facility matures in August 2009 and consists of a revolving loan of $50 million and a $25 million term facility. Approximately $55 million (including the entire term loan) was borrowed on August 11, 2004 to finance the Cooperheat-MQS acquisition (approximately $36 million) and to refinance amounts outstanding on the existing Team facilities (approximately $19 million). The term facility requires amortization of $3 million in the first year, $4 million in year two and $6 million in each of years three through five. Amortization begins in November 2004. Interest on the facility is at LIBOR plus a margin which is variable depending upon the ratio of funded debt to EBITDA. Initially, the margin will be 225 basis points above the LIBOR rate. The new facility is secured by virtually all the Company’s assets, including those acquired in the Cooperheat-MQS transaction. The Company paid an underwriters fee of 1.625% of the aggregate amount of the facility. In the opinion of management, the Company currently has sufficient funds and adequate financial sources available to meet its anticipated liquidity needs. Management believes that cash flows from operations, cash balances and available borrowings will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to finance anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and debt service requirements. Critical Accounting Policies Goodwill—The Company has $15.1 million of recorded goodwill associated with business acquisitions made since 1999. Of that amount, approximately $12.2 million is associated with the industrial services segment and $2.9 million is associated with the equipment sales and rental business. Effective June 1, 2002, we have adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which requires that goodwill no longer be amortized but be reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment testing as of May 31 of each year. The Company has evaluated the carrying value of goodwill using a cash-flow multiple calculation methodology and has determined that no adjustment is needed to the carrying value of goodwill during 2003 or 2004. Revenue Recognition—The Company derives its revenues by providing a variety of industrial services including leak repair, hot tapping, emissions control services, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat treating and inspection services. These revenues are based on time and materials and are generally short term in nature. In addition, the Company sells and rents portable machine tools through one of its subsidiaries. For all of these services, revenues are recognized when services are rendered or when product is shipped and risk of ownership passes to the customer. Deferred Income Taxes—The Company records deferred income tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company computes its deferred tax balances by multiplying these temporary differences by the current tax rates. If deferred tax assets exceed deferred tax liabilities, the Company must estimate whether those net deferred asset amounts will be realized in the future. A valuation allowance is then provided for the net deferred asset amounts that are not likely to be realized. As of May 31, 2004 management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will have sufficient future taxable income to allow it to realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded. Loss Contingencies—The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims encountered in the normal course of business. When such a matter arises and periodically thereafter, management consults with its legal counsel and evaluates the merits of the claim based on the facts available at that time. Currently, the Company is involved with two significant matters, which are summarized in Legal Proceedings above. In management’s opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of May 31, 2004 to provide for any losses that may arise from these contingencies. 13 Other Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The Company enters into capital leases related to certain computer and equipment and software, as well as operating leases related to facilities and transportation and other equipment. These operating leases are over terms ranging from one to five years with typical renewal options and escalation clauses. The Company is occasionally required to post letters of credit generally issued by a bank as collateral under certain agreements. A letter of credit commits the issuer to remit specified amounts to the holder, if the holder demonstrates that the Company has failed to meet its obligations under the letter of credit. If this were to occur, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the issuer for any payments the issuer was required to remit to the holder of the letter of credit. To date, the Company has not had any claims made against a letter of credit that resulted in a payment made be the issuer or the Company to the holder. The Company believes that it is unlikely that it will have to fund claims made under letters of credit in the foreseeable future. At May 31, 2004, the Company’s contractual obligations are summarized as follows: Year ending May 31, Operating Leases Debt Obligations Post Retirement Benefit 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,114,000 2,029,000 1,006,000 416,000 62,000 — $ 1,482,000 16,160,000 125,000 810,000 — — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,627,000 $18,577,000 $245,000 100,000 39,000 — — — $384,000 Total $ 4,841,000 18,289,000 1,170,000 1,226,000 62,000 — $25,588,000 New Accounting Standards In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” The statement applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 became effective for the Company in June 2003 and has not impacted the Company’s financial statements. The company has reviewed other new accounting standards not identified above and does not believe any other new standards will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results. Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Any forward-looking information contained herein is being provided in accordance with the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Such information is subject to certain assumptions and beliefs based on current information known to the Company and is subject to factors that could result in actual results differing materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements contained herein. Such factors include domestic and international economic activity, interest rates, market conditions for the Company’s customers, regulatory changes and legal proceedings, and the Company’s successful implementation of its internal operating plans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements contained herein will occur or that objectives will be achieved. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company has a credit facility, which subjects the Company to the risk of loss associated with movements in market interest rates. At May 31, 2004, the Company has floating-rate obligations totaling $18.6 million outstanding under its credit facility (see Note 6 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). A 1% increase in interest rates could result in an annual increase in interest expense of $186,000. 14 ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Board of Directors and Stockholders of Team, Inc. Alvin, Texas We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Team, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Team, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” as of June 1, 2002. KPMG LLP Houston, Texas July 14, 2004, except as to note 15, which is as of August 11, 2004 15 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS May 31, 2004 2003 Current Assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Receivables, net of allowance of $506 and $533 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,019,000 27,881,000 9,928,000 — 924,000 515,000 $ 854,000 17,707,000 9,498,000 16,000 783,000 559,000 Total Current Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41,267,000 29,417,000 Property, Plant and Equipment: Land and buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $42,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $922,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,893,000 28,469,000 35,362,000 19,477,000 15,885,000 1,208,000 15,063,000 973,000 7,293,000 22,517,000 29,810,000 17,542,000 12,268,000 — 10,049,000 490,000 Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $74,396,000 $52,224,000 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,482,000 4,501,000 7,021,000 551,000 $ 1,482,000 3,195,000 5,027,000 — Total Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,555,000 9,704,000 Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,074,000 17,095,000 139,000 606,000 9,577,000 384,000 Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,863,000 20,271,000 Minority Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and Contingencies 234,000 218,000 Stockholders’ Equity: Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized, none issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock, par value $.30 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,070,250 and 8,587,512 shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings (deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Treasury stock at cost, 1,018,308 and 968,308 shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 2,715,000 39,060,000 5,508,000 48,000 (5,032,000) 2,576,000 34,065,000 (268,000) (1,000) (4,637,000) Total Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,299,000 31,735,000 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $74,396,000 $52,224,000 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 16 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $107,669,000 64,985,000 $91,876,000 54,684,000 $85,081,000 49,616,000 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,684,000 37,192,000 35,465,000 Selling, general and administrative expenses Non cash G&A compensation cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other SG&A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expense (income) Earnings before interest and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per common share —Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ Weighted average number of shares outstanding 344,000 32,589,000 — 10,000 9,741,000 519,000 9,222,000 3,446,000 115,000 29,183,000 — 150,000 7,744,000 601,000 7,143,000 2,741,000 368,000 27,411,000 275,000 173,000 7,238,000 892,000 6,346,000 2,437,000 5,776,000 $ 4,402,000 $ 3,909,000 0.75 0.69 $ $ 0.57 0.53 $ $ 0.51 0.48 —Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,709,000 7,707,000 7,664,000 —Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,429,000 8,369,000 8,229,000 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 17 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative effect of an accounting change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (losses) on interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reclassification adjustments related to interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax (provision) benefit $5,776,000 — 43,000 — 22,000 (16,000) $4,402,000 — 49,000 — 26,000 (19,000) $3,909,000 (56,000) (149,000) 113,000 — 35,000 Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,825,000 $4,458,000 $3,852,000 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 18 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 COMMON STOCK: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,576,000 89,000 — 50,000 $ 2,499,000 2,000 — 75,000 $ 2,503,000 5,000 (71,000) 62,000 Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,715,000 $ 2,576,000 $ 2,499,000 ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Value of options issued in exchange for earn-out . . . . . . . . . . . . Non cash compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,065,000 4,091,000 — 560,000 — 344,000 $32,961,000 58,000 — 931,000 — 115,000 $32,257,000 46,000 (741,000) 748,000 283,000 368,000 Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $39,060,000 $34,065,000 $32,961,000 ACCUMULATED DEFICIT: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (268,000) $ (4,670,000) $ (8,579,000) 3,909,000 4,402,000 5,776,000 Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,508,000 $ (268,000) $ (4,670,000) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (1,000) $ 27,000 22,000 (57,000) $ 30,000 26,000 — (57,000) — Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 48,000 $ (1,000) $ (57,000) TREASURY STOCK: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (4,637,000) $ (2,551,000) $ (1,369,000) (1,994,000) (2,086,000) 812,000 (395,000) — — Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (5,032,000) $ (4,637,000) $ (2,551,000) TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $42,299,000 $31,735,000 $28,182,000 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 19 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on disposal of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary and other Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non cash G&A compensation cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions: (Increase) decrease: Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 $ 5,776,000 $ 4,402,000 $ 3,909,000 2,892,000 184,000 (235,000) (65,000) 311,000 344,000 2,555,000 263,000 — (56,000) 312,000 115,000 2,693,000 119,000 — (17,000) (47,000) 368,000 Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10,358,000) (430,000) 44,000 16,000 Increase (decrease): Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,306,000 2,053,000 786,000 (720,000) (696,000) (41,000) (16,000) 242,000 827,000 (621,000) (2,761,000) (557,000) (215,000) — 996,000 882,000 (89,000) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,624,000 $ 6,566,000 $ 5,281,000 Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rental and demonstration equipment Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . (Increase) decrease in other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,330,000) (120,000) 170,000 (30,000) (5,401,000) (2,037,000) (560,000) 37,000 30,000 — (2,043,000) (369,000) 122,000 (102,000) — Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (8,711,000) $(2,530,000) $(2,392,000) Cash Flows From Financing Activities: (Payments) borrowings under debt agreements and other long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Repurchase of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,273,000 374,000 (395,000) $(2,670,000) $(1,852,000) 812,000 (1,994,000) 751,000 (2,086,000) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . 7,252,000 (4,005,000) (3,034,000) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,165,000 854,000 31,000 823,000 (145,000) 968,000 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,019,000 $ 854,000 $ 823,000 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 532,000 $ 626,000 $ 981,000 Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,467,000 $ 2,936,000 $ 2,200,000 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 20 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements of Team, Inc. (the “Company”) include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Use of Estimates in Financial Statement Preparation The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s financial statements include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of assets are computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Classification Life Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment 20-30 years 2-10 years Machinery and equipment includes rental and demonstration machining tools used in the equipment sales and rental business segment totaling $2,350,000 and $2,324,000 (before accumulated depreciation of $392,000 and $283,000) at May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These self–constructed assets are periodically transferred to inventory and sold as used equipment. Total depreciation expense for the Company was $2,541,000, $2,229,000 and $2,138,000 for fiscal years ending May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Goodwill SFAS No. 142 Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets became effective for the Company as of June 1, 2002. According to SFAS No. 142, goodwill that arises from purchases after June 30, 2001 cannot be amortized. In addition, SFAS No. 142 requires that amortization of existing goodwill will cease on the first day of the adoption year. Accordingly, the Company stopped recording the amortization of goodwill as a charge to earnings effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2003. 21 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) The following table sets forth the pro-forma impact on the prior years had the provisions of the new standard been applied as of June 1, 2001: Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 Reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Add back: Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,776,000 — $4,402,000 — $3,909,000 275,000 Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,776,000 $4,402,000 $4,184,000 Basic earnings per share: Reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share: Reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjusted net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 0.75 — 0.75 0.69 — 0.69 $ $ $ $ 0.57 — 0.57 0.53 — 0.53 $ $ $ $ 0.51 0.04 0.55 0.48 0.03 0.51 The Company had six months from the date it initially applied SFAS No. 142 to test goodwill for impairment. Thereafter, goodwill must be tested for impairment at least annually and impairment losses, if any, will be presented in the operating section of the income statement. The Company has completed the required annual impairment test and has determined that there is no impairment of goodwill as of May 31, 2004. Revenue Recognition The Company derives its revenues by providing a variety of industrial services. These revenues are based on time and materials and are generally short term in nature. In addition, the Company sells and rents portable machine tools through one of its subsidiaries. For all of these services, revenues are recognized when services are rendered or when product is shipped and risk of ownership passes to the customer. Income Taxes The Company accounts for taxes on income using the asset and liability method wherein deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted rates. Concentration of Credit Risk The Company provides services to the chemical, petrochemical, refining, pulp and paper, power and steel industries throughout the United States. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of consolidated revenues. Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation. Earnings Per Share The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share (“EPS”). 22 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) There is no difference, for any of the years presented, in the amount of net income (numerator) used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share. With respect to the number of weighted average shares outstanding (denominator), diluted shares reflects only the pro forma exercise of options to acquire common stock to the extent that the options’ exercise prices are less than the average market price of common shares during the period. Options to purchase 70,500 and 112,000 shares of common stock were outstanding during the years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common shares during the period. In 2002, all outstanding options were “in the money” and therefore, no options were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS in that year. Statement of Cash Flows For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Dividends No dividends were paid during the current or prior two fiscal years. Pursuant to the Company’s Credit Agreement, the Company may not pay quarterly dividends without the consent of its senior lender. Future dividend payments will depend upon the Company’s financial condition and other relevant matters. Interest Rate Swap Agreements The differential to be paid or received on interest rate swap agreements is accrued as interest rates change and is recognized over the life of the agreements as an increase or decrease in interest expense. The Company does not use these instruments for trading purposes. Instead, it uses them to hedge the impact of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt. See Note 6 regarding the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt obligations. The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable are representative of their respective fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair values of the Company’s credit facility are representative of their carrying values based upon the variable rate terms and management’s opinion that the current rates offered to the Company with the same maturity and security structure are equivalent to that of the credit facility. New Accounting Standards In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” The statement applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 became effective for the Company in June 2003 and has not impacted the Company’s financial statements. The Company has reviewed other new accounting standards not identified above and does not believe any other new standard will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results. 23 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Stock-Based Compensation The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, generally no compensation expense is recognized. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123 and 148, which also requires that the information be determined as if the Company has accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for the options granted after this date was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted- average assumptions for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively: risk-free interest rate of 2.3%, 1.8%, and 3.8%; volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock of 28.0%, 35.6%, and 42.8%; expected dividend yield percentage of 0.0% for each period; and a weighted average expected life of the option of three years for each period. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. The Company’s pro forma information, as if the fair value method described above had been adopted, is as follows: Net income—as reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock based employee compensation expense included in Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 $5,776,000 $4,402,000 $3,909,000 reported net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 344,000 115,000 368,000 Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards (187,000) (165,000) (163,000) Pro forma net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,933,000 $4,352,000 $4,114,000 Earinings per share—Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro forma earnings per share—Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earinings per share—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro forma earnings per share—diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ 0.75 0.77 0.69 0.70 $ $ $ $ 0.57 0.56 0.53 0.52 $ $ $ $ 0.51 0.54 0.48 0.50 2. RECEIVABLES Receivables consist of: Trade accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28,332,000 55,000 (506,000) $18,180,000 60,000 (533,000) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27,881,000 $17,707,000 May 31, 2004 2003 24 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) The following summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Write off of bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 533,000 452,000 (479,000) $ 511,000 263,000 (241,000) $392,000 119,000 — Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 506,000 $ 533,000 $511,000 Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 3. INVENTORIES Inventories consist of: Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Finished goods and work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,082,000 8,846,000 $1,084,000 8,414,000 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9,928,000 $9,498,000 May 31, 2004 2003 4. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES Other accrued liabilities consist of: Payroll and other compensation expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current payments due to former officers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,608,000 1,519,000 78,000 245,000 1,571,000 $2,771,000 1,261,000 77,000 238,000 680,000 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $7,021,000 $5,027,000 May 31, 2004 2003 5. INCOME TAXES The provision for income taxes attributable to pre-tax earnings are as follows: Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2003 2004 2002 Federal income taxes: Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,634,000 279,000 $2,093,000 279,000 $2,013,000 (37,000) State income taxes: Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316,000 32,000 185,000 336,000 33,000 — 468,000 (7,000) — Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,446,000 $2,741,000 $2,437,000 25 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) A reconciliation between income taxes related to earnings before income taxes and income taxes computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to such earnings follows: Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 Earnings before federal income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9,222,000 $7,143,000 $6,346,000 Computed income taxes at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,136,000 — 230,000 80,000 $2,429,000 — 325,000 (13,000) $2,158,000 93,000 309,000 (123,000) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,446,000 $2,741,000 $2,437,000 A summary of the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities follows: Receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 31, 2004 165,000 946,000 182,000 2003 201,000 777,000 222,000 Gross deferred assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,293,000 1,200,000 Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,220,000) (223,000) $ (800,000) (223,000) Gross deferred liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,443,000) (1,023,000) Net deferred taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (150,000) $ 177,000 No valuation account is required for the deferred tax assets as management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will have sufficient taxable income in the future that will allow it to realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets. Most of the assets represent temporary differences on certain accruals that will reverse over a period of less than 10 years. 6. LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt consists of: Revolving loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term and mortgage notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,000,000 4,577,000 $ 5,000,000 6,059,000 Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,577,000 1,482,000 11,059,000 1,482,000 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,095,000 $ 9,577,000 May 31, 2004 2003 26 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Maturities of long-term debt are as follows: Year ending May 31, 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter $ 1,482,000 16,160,000 125,000 810,000 — — $18,577,000 The Company has a $34 million bank credit facility that consists of: (i) a $22,500,000 revolving loan, which matures September 30, 2005, (ii) $9,500,000 in term loans for business acquisitions and (iii) a $2,000,000 mortgage loan. Amounts borrowed against the term loans are due in quarterly installments in the amount of $339,000 until the loans mature on September 30, 2005. Amounts borrowed against the mortgage loan are repaid in quarterly installments of $31,000 until its maturity date of September 30, 2008. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a marginal rate over either the LIBOR rate or the prime rate. At May 31, 2004, the Company’s marginal rate was 1.5% over the LIBOR rate. The weighted average rate on outstanding borrowings at May 31, 2004 is approximately 3.1%. The Company also pays a commitment fee of .25% per annum on the average amount of the unused availability under the revolving loan. The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that expired in September, 2003 and which qualified as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. The agreement was entered into in 1998 to hedge the exposure of an increase in interest rates. Pursuant to this agreement, which covered approximately $2.1 million of outstanding debt, the Company exchanged a variable LIBOR rate for a fixed LIBOR rate of approximately 5.2%. As the interest rates on the credit facility are based on market rates, the fair value of amounts outstanding under the facility approximate the carrying value. The interest rate swap agreements had a negative mark-to- market value of approximately $43,000 at May 31, 2003. The fair value of the interest rate swaps were estimated by discounting expected cash flows using quoted market interest rates. Two other swap agreements, covering approximately $3.5 million, expired on December 31, 2001. As of May 31, 2004 the Company had no outstanding swap agreements. Loans under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The terms of the agreement require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and limit investments, liens, leases and indebtedness, and dividends, among other things. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all credit facility covenants. At May 31, 2004, the Company was contingently liable for $2.2 million in outstanding stand-by letters of credit and, at that date, approximately $6.3 million was available to borrow under the credit facility. On August 11, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of the business assets of Cooperheat-MQS, Inc. (see Note 15), the existing credit facility was replaced with a new $75 million facility. The new facility matures in August 2009 and consists of a revolving loan of $50 million and a $25 million term facility. Approximately $55 million (including the entire term loan) was borrowed on August 11, 2004 to finance the Cooperheat-MQS acquisition (approximately $36 million) and to refinance amounts outstanding on the existing Team facilities (approximately $19 million). The term facility requires amortization of $3 million in the first year, $4 million in year two and $6 million in each of years three through five. Amortization begins in November 2004. Interest on 27 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) the facility is at LIBOR plus a margin which is variable depending upon the ratio of funded debt to EBITDA. Initially, the margin will be 225 basis points above the LIBOR rate. The new facility is secured by virtually all the Company’s assets, including those acquired in the Cooperheat-MQS transaction. The Company paid an underwriters fee of 1.625% of the aggregate amount of the facility. 7. OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Other liabilities consisted of: Post retirement payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less amounts due in one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 384,000 (245,000) $ 622,000 (238,000) $ 139,000 $ 384,000 May 31, 2004 2003 Amounts due within one year of $245,000 and $238,000, respectively, are included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Post Retirement Benefits: The Company is obligated for post-retirement benefits to three former officers with payments due through 2007. Future maturities of amounts due under post retirement benefit agreements are as follows: Year ending May 31, 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $245,000 100,000 39,000 $384,000 8. OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME) In 2004, net other expense of $10,000 consists of a $245,000 expense associated with special sales tax obligations offset by a $235,000 gain from the sale of idle real estate. Both matters involve the wholly owned subsidiary, Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc. In regards to the sales tax matter, Climax is domiciled in the state of Oregon, a state that imposes no tax on sales originating there. In fiscal 2003, management determined that Climax does have an obligation to collect and remit sales taxes in certain other jurisdictions, which it had not previously done. Climax is nearing completion of a process of entering into agreements with several states with respect to sales tax obligations and is in the process of collecting amounts due from its customers. In fiscal 2003 the Company recorded a $150,000 charge related to this matter. The cumulative $395,000 charge represents management’s best current estimate of the probable loss that Climax will incur with respect to this matter. In regards to the real estate sale, Climax sold idle real estate for a total consideration of $760,000, comprised of $128,000 in cash and a note receivable for $632,000. The note bears interest at 6% per annum and matures on May 1, 2007. Interest payments are due in quarterly installments and a principal payment of $32,000 is due annually. At May 31, 2004 the balance outstanding on the note was $601,000. The amount is recorded as an Other asset on the balance sheet. In 2002, other expense of $173,000 consists of severance and related costs associated with a reduction in work force at Climax. All such amounts were paid during the year ended May 31, 2002. 28 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 9. STOCK OPTIONS AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS Stock Options: The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, generally no compensation expense is recognized. Pursuant to various option plans, the Company has granted options to purchase common stock to officers, directors and employees at prices equal to or greater than the market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price, terms and other conditions applicable to each option granted under the Company’s plans are generally determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant of each option and may vary. In addition to the options granted under the option plans discussed above, the Company’s chief executive officer was granted options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at a price of $3.625 per share upon joining the Company in 1998. Such grant was subject to a vesting schedule based on stock performance measures which provided that one third of the options vest upon the sustained achievement of average stock prices of $7.00, $10.50, and $14.00 per share. The first standard was met near the end of May 2002, when the price of Team’s stock was $9.15 per share. Consequently, at that time, the Company was required to recognize a non-cash G&A compensation charge associated with one third of the options totaling $368,000 (approximately $0.03 per share, net of tax). In July 2002, the Board of Directors modified the vesting requirements of the remaining 133,333 performance based options held by the chief executive officer as well as 20,000 performance based options held by an officer of one of the Company’s subsidiaries. The modification causes the remaining options to vest on May 31, 2008 unless earlier vesting occurs, in the case of the chief executive officer, as a result of the achievement of the $10.50 and $14.00 stock-price hurdles described above. The modification allowed the Company to fix the amount of the future non-cash G&A compensation expense associated with the remaining options ($750,000) and to recognize the charge against earnings ratably over a six-year period of time ($125,000 per year), unless otherwise accelerated by the achievement of the performance hurdles. In April 2004 the $10.50 stock-price hurdle was achieved resulting in the accelerated vesting of 66,667 shares of the chief executive officer’s remaining 133,333 options. As a result, the Company accelerated the recognition of an additional $219,000 in non-cash G&A compensation expense on top of the scheduled $125,000 in fiscal 2004. In August 2004, the final stock-price hurdle of $14.00 was achieved resulting in the accelerated vesting of the remaining 66,666 options. As a result, the Company will record the remaining $219,000 associated with the chief executive officer’s options in the 1st quarter of fiscal 2005. The expense related to the 20,000 options held by the officer of the Company’s subsidiary will continue to be charged against earnings ratably over their remaining life at approximately $4,000 each quarter. 29 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Transactions under all plans are summarized below: (For purposes of the summary, the chief executive officer’s performance options that vested in fiscal 2002 (67,000) and that were modified in 2003 (133,000) are included as fiscal 2002 and 2003 grants, respectively). Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2004 2003 2002 No. of Options Weighted Average Price No. of Options Weighted Average Price No. of Options Weighted Average Price Shares under option, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,284,000 $ 4.04 1,277,000 $3.41 1,114,800 $3.00 Changes during the year: Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CEO Performance Options . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201,000 $10.11 — $ — (187,000) $ 3.34 (12,000) $ 7.12 134,000 133,000 (250,000) (10,000) Shares under option, end of year . . . . . . 1,286,000 $ 5.06 1,284,000 $8.96 $3.63 $3.00 $7.44 $4.04 324,200 67,000 (209,000) (20,000) 1,277,000 $4.25 $3.63 $3.88 $3.63 $3.41 Exercisable at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . 993,000 $ 4.20 1,074,000 $3.77 980,000 $3.27 Available for future grant . . . . . . . . . . . 439,000 440,000 174,000 Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during year . . . . . . $ 2.14 $ 2.36 $ 1.29 For options outstanding at May 31, 2004, the range of exercise prices and remaining contractual lives are as follows: Range of Prices $1.94 to $2.75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.12 to $3.50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.56 to $4.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5.15 to $9.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.80 to $13.92 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. of Options 180,000 205,000 485,000 345,000 71,000 1,286,000 Weighted Average Price Weighted Average Life (in years) $ 2.26 $ 3.46 $ 3.71 $ 7.62 $13.61 $ 5.06 4.2 4.6 4.8 8.3 9.9 5.9 Employee Benefit Plans: Under the Team, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan, contributions are made by qualified employees at their election and matching Company contributions are made at specified rates. Company contributions in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, were $383,000, $363,000, and $319,000, respectively. 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Loss Contingencies In December 2001, the Company and 18 other defendants were sued in a lawsuit styled Lyondell Chemical Company and Atlantic Richfield Company v. Ethyl Corporation et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. In April and May of 2004, the District Court granted motions for 30 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) summary judgment filed by the Company and dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice with respect to claims against Team allegedly arising out of its ownership of the stock of French Limited and of Allstate Vacuum and Tanks, Inc (“Allstate”). The Company has reason to believe that the Plaintiffs will appeal the Court’s ruling in favor of the Company at the end of the case. This lawsuit arises out of a previous lawsuit filed by the United States of America against the Plaintiffs, Lyondell and Arco Chemical, alleging that hazardous substances and/or pollutants or contaminants were deposited at the Turtle Bayou Site in Liberty County, Texas. Arco and Lyondell entered into a settlement with the United States which was embodied in a Consent Decree. Within three years after the Consent Decree was entered, Arco and Lyondell brought the referenced suit against approximately 18 parties seeking contribution for the costs of response for removal and/or remedial action at the Turtle Bayou Site. The co-defendants include, among others, Exxon-Mobil, El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Company, Du Pont, Ethyl Corporation, and Lubrizol. Later, El Paso added approximately nine additional defendants. Plaintiffs allege that French Ltd., a vacuum truck company that the Company owned from 1978 to 1984, or its former parent, French Limited of Houston, Inc., had, during the time period of 1969 to 1976, transported hazardous substances to the Turtle Bayou Site. In 1982, as a result of the contentions made by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Company informed George Whitten, the one who had sold French, Ltd. to the Company, that his failure to reveal French, Ltd.’s activities with respect to the illegal depositing of hazardous substances was a breach of the representations and warranties of the agreement by which the Company acquired French, Ltd. In November 1984, the Company sold French back to Whitten. The Plaintiffs alleged that French, Ltd. and, therefore, the Company, should be held liable for French Limited and/or French Limited of Houston, Inc.’s allegedly wrongful deposits of some of the material that was deposited at the Site. Plaintiffs also allege that the Company should be held liable for some alleged disposal of hazardous waste by another former Company subsidiary, Allstate. In addition to the claims originally put forward by the Plaintiffs, nine of the Defendants have filed cross- claims against the Company in which they contended they do not believe they should be held liable on Plaintiffs’ claims against them, but that if they are held liable then they seek contribution from the Company and other defendants. In addition, the four of those same nine defendants which are related to the El Paso Corporation (the “El Paso Defendants”) seek contribution against the Company and others on a related claim by the United States Government on another location within the Turtle Bayou Site at which hazardous wastes were disposed. All defendants except the El Paso Defendants have agreed orally to dismiss their cross-claims against the Company subject to revival if the Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgments granted by the District Court. Management believes that the El Paso defendants and the Company are close to an agreement with respect to a motion to dismiss similar to the one proposed with the other defendants; if the Company is not successful in reaching such an agreement, then the Company plans to file a motion for summary judgment requesting that the District Court apply its previously granted summary judgments against the El Paso Defendants. The Company believes that the claims against it in this matter are without merit, as is supported by the rulings of the District Court. In April 2003, Team and three other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit styled Diamond Shamrock Refining Company, L.P. v. Cecorp, Inc. et al in the 148th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas. The suit seeks recovery for $40 million in property damages from an explosion and fire originating at a valve which the Company’s personnel were attempting to seal in order to prevent a leak. Liability is being 31 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) contested and other parties appear to have primary responsibility for the fire and explosion. The Company is insured against this loss with both primary and excess liability insurance, subject to any applicable deductible. In June 2004, Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation made demand on Team Industrial Services, Inc. for indemnity from claims asserted against Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation in Linda Alapisco, et al v. Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation, et al, Cause No. L-030085, in the 156th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas. This suit seeks unspecified damages for the 250 individuals identified in the petition for injuries resulting from alleged exposure to toxic chemicals released as a result of the explosion and fire at the Diamond Shamrock facility. This demand has been turned over to American Safety for a response. As of the date of this report, American Safety has not responded to the claim. The Company’s umbrella policy has limits of coverage of $25,000,000 and should be more than sufficient to provide the Company a defense and indemnity as to all claims asserted. However, coverage from the $1 million primary policy is disputed and a defense is being provided by the carrier subject to a reservation of rights. The Company and certain subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits and are subject to various claims and proceedings encountered in the normal conduct of business. In the opinion of management, any uninsured losses that might arise from these lawsuits and proceedings will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See also Note 8 for a discussion of sales tax contingencies. Lease Commitments The Company’s operating leases relate to facilities and transportation and other equipment which are leased over terms ranging from one to five years with typical renewal options and escalation clauses. Rental payments on operating leases charged against earnings were $3,428,000, $3,294,000 and $2,848,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Minimum rental commitments for future periods are as follows: Year ending May 31, 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating Leases $3,114,000 2,029,000 1,006,000 416,000 62,000 Total minimum payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6,627,000 11. COMMON STOCK During fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company reacquired 50,000, 309,788, and 200,100 shares, respectively, pursuant to an approved, open market repurchase plan at an average price of $7.89, $6.73, and $5.93 per share, in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The shares acquired through open market purchases have not been formally retired and, accordingly, are carried as treasury stock. Additionally, in June 2001, the Company completed the reacquisition of 235,647 shares of its common stock for $812,000, including expenses, pursuant to a self-tender offer announced in April 2001. These shares were retired and, accordingly, the cost was charged to Common Stock (at par value of $.30 per share) and to Additional Paid-in Capital. 32 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) The following summarizes the activity of shares outstanding for the years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002: No. of Shares, May 31, 2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued for director fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. of shares, May 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued for director fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. of shares, May 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued for director fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares issued for business acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common Stock Issued 8,342,654 15,150 208,975 — (235,647) 8,331,132 6,630 249,750 — 8,587,512 7,500 288,413 186,825 — Treasury Stock Shares Outstanding (459,420) — — (434,747) 235,647 (658,520) — — (309,788) (968,308) — — — (50,000) 7,883,234 15,150 208,975 (434,747) — 7,672,612 6,630 249,750 (309,788) 7,619,204 7,500 288,413 186,825 (50,000) No. of shares, May 31, 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,070,250 (1,018,308) 8,051,942 As of May 31, 2004, the Company is authorized by its Board of Directors and lender to expend up to an additional $1.7 million on open market repurchases of common stock. 12. INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” requires that the Company disclose certain information about its operating segments where operating segments are defined as “components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.” Generally, financial information is required to be reported on the basis that is used internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to segments. Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, the Company has two reportable segments: industrial services and equipment sales and rentals. The industrial services segment includes services consisting of leak repair, hot tapping, emissions control monitoring, field machining, and mechanical inspection. The equipment sales and rental segment consists of the Climax business. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on earnings before interest and taxes. Inter- segment sales are eliminated in the operating measure used by the Company to evaluate segment performance, and this has been eliminated in the following schedule. Interest is not allocated to the segments. 33 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Information about business segments for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is set forth below: Fiscal Year ended May 31, 2004 Industrial Services Equipment Sales & Rentals Corporate & Other Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $94,546,000 $13,123,000 $ — $107,669,000 Earnings before interest and Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest 13,953,000 — 1,220,000 — (5,432,000) 519,000 9,741,000 519,000 Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,953,000 1,220,000 (5,951,000) $ 9,222,000 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,774,000 Captial expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,917,000 623,000 408,000 495,000 5,000 $ $ 2,892,000 3,330,000 Identifiable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $56,131,000 13,056,000 5,209,000 $ 74,396,000 Fiscal Year ended May 31, 2003 Industrial Services Equipment Sales & Rentals Corporate & Other Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $81,122,000 $10,754,000 $ — $91,876,000 Earnings before interest and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest 12,012,000 — 603,000 — (4,871,000) 601,000 7,744,000 601,000 Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,012,000 603,000 (5,472,000) $ 7,143,000 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,539,000 Captial expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,619,000 605,000 303,000 411,000 $ 2,555,000 115,000 $ 2,037,000 Identifiable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $36,560,000 11,386,000 4,278,000 $52,224,000 Fiscal Year ended May 31, 2002 Industrial Services Equipment Sales & Rentals Corporate & Other Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $74,513,000 $10,568,000 $ — $85,081,000 Earnings before interest and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest 11,470,000 — 547,000 — (4,779,000) 892,000 7,238,000 892,000 Earnings before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,470,000 Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,644,000 Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,829,000 $ $ $ 547,000 $(5,671,000) $ 6,346,000 684,000 120,000 $ $ 365,000 $ 2,693,000 94,000 $ 2,043,000 Identifiable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35,430,000 $12,247,000 $ 3,512,000 $51,189,000 34 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 13. ACQUISITIONS On April 15, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding capital stock of Thermal Solutions, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“TSI”). Pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) dated and effective as of April 1, 2004 among Team, Team Industrial Services, Inc., a the TSI Texas corporation and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Team (“Team Industrial”), TSI, shareholders and Michael J. Urban as the shareholder representative, TSI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Team Industrial. Team paid consideration of approximately $9 million in cash, which included $1.3 million for the repayment of TSI’s debt and a $1.7 million adjustment for working capital acquired in excess of the minimum amount specified in the Stock Purchase Agreement, and issued 288,413 shares of its common stock, $0.30 par value per share (the “Team Stock”), pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. Of such amounts, $500,000 in cash and 189,019 shares of Team Stock were deposited into an escrow fund (the “Escrow Fund”) that may be used by Team to satisfy working capital and accounts receivable adjustments and its indemnification rights under the Stock Purchase Agreement. (Amounts remaining in the Escrow Fund and not subject to pending claims are to be distributed to the former TSI shareholders over a three year period ending in April 2007.) The Escrow Fund was established pursuant to the terms of an Escrow Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) dated April 15, 2004 by and among Team, Team Industrial, TSI, the TSI shareholders, the shareholder representative and Compass Bank. The amount of the consideration contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement was determined through arm’s-length negotiations among the parties. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements subsequent to the effective dates of the acquisitions reflect the purchase price, including transaction costs. As the acquisition of TSI was effective April 1, 2004, the consolidated results of operations for the Company for the year ended May 31, 2004, include the results for TSI for the period April 1, 2004 to May 31, 2004. The purchase price of TSI was allocated to the assets and liabilities of TSI based on its estimated fair value. The goodwill associated with the acquisition totaled approximately $5.0 million. Information regarding the allocation of the purchase price is set forth below: Cash and borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common stock issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transaction costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fair value of net assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess purchase price to be allocated to: $ 7,796,000 4,120,000 475,000 12,391,000 6,581,000 Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Covenant not to compete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,560,000 $ 1,250,000 The covenant not to compete is a general agreement made with the principals of Thermal not to compete with Team for a period of five years. The valuation of the covenant was determined by an independent third party. The covenant is being amortized on a straight line basis over the five year term of the agreement. 35 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations of the Company are shown below as if the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the fiscal period indicated. These results are not necessarily indicative of the results which would actually have occurred if the purchase had taken place at the beginning of the period, nor are they necessarily indicative of future results. Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings per share Pro forma data (unaudited) Twelve months ended May 31, 2004 2003 $121,104,000 5,997,000 $ $108,123,000 4,681,000 $ Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.78 0.71 $ $ 0.59 0.54 14. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) The Company’s consolidated results of operations by quarter for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004, and 2003 are shown below. Fiscal 2004 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $24,918,000 $25,807,000 $25,137,000 $31,807,000 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10,112,000 $10,219,000 $ 9,951,000 $12,402,000 Earnings before interest and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,363,000 $ 2,590,000 $ 1,711,000 $ 3,077,000 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,362,000 $ 1,552,000 $ 980,000 $ 1,882,000 Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.18 0.17 $ $ 0.20 0.19 $ $ Fiscal 2003 0.13 0.12 $ $ 0.24 0.22 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22,008,000 $23,160,000 $21,777,000 $24,931,000 Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9,031,000 $ 9,607,000 $ 8,451,000 $10,103,000 Earnings before interest and taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,017,000 $ 2,367,000 $ 1,018,000 $ 2,342,000 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,148,000 $ 1,364,000 $ 538,000 $ 1,352,000 Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.15 0.14 $ $ 0.18 0.16 $ $ 0.07 0.06 $ $ 0.18 0.17 15. Subsequent Events On August 11, 2004 the Company announced that it had executed an Asset Purchase Agreement to purchase substantially all of the assets of International Industrial Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“IISI”), and Cooperheat-MQS, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Cooperheat”), including the capital stock of certain subsidiaries of IISI and Cooperheat (together, “Cooperheat”). 36 TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) Cooperheat is operating as debtor-in-possession in a Chapter 11 case pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston, Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) (Case Nos. 03-48272-H2-11 and 03-48273-H2-11). On August 6, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the sale of the assets by Cooperheat to the Company pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement. On August 11, 2004, substantially all of the assets of Cooperheat were sold to the Company pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement for cash consideration of $35 million, subject to a working capital adjustment, the assumption of certain liabilities including the assumption of $1.7 million in letters of credit and the issuance of warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of the common stock, $.30 par value per share, of Team. The warrants are exercisable at $65 cash per share and expire on August 11, 2007, unless sooner exercised. The assets purchased from Cooperheat are associated with a non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection and field heat treating services business. The Company intends to integrate the purchased assets and associated business activity with its other industrial service activities. The transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement, as well as a restructuring of the Company’s current indebtedness to Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), were financed with funds provided under a Credit Agreement dated as of August 11, 2004 (the “Credit Agreement”) by and among the Company, the other lenders party thereto and Bank of America, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line lender and L/C issuer. The Credit Agreement permits borrowing of amounts up to an aggregate $75 million, and includes a letter of credit facility, a revolving credit facility and a term loan. Extensions of credit under the Credit Agreement have a maturity date five years from the date of inception, and the Company may elect an interest rate for each advance under the Credit Agreement at either (i) LIBOR plus a maximum margin of 2.25%, which may be reduced upon the satisfaction of certain financial conditions, or (ii) the higher of Bank of America’s prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.50%. The payment and performance of the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries. Cooperheat is a leading provider of non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection and field heat treating services throughout the U.S. and Canada, and its projected calendar year 2004 revenues are estimated to be approximately $80 million. 37 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE There have been no disagreements concerning accounting and financial disclosures with the Company’s independent accountants within the past two years. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES The Company’s chief executive officer and its chief financial officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report and have concluded that such controls are effective. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. PART III The information contained in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III has been omitted from this Report on Form 10-K since the Company will file, not later than 120 days following the close of its fiscal year ended May 31, 2004, its definitive proxy statement. The information required by Part III will be included in that proxy statement and such information is hereby incorporated by reference, with the exception of the information under the headings “Compensation Committee Report” and “Comparison of Total Shareholders’ Return.” PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) 1. Financial Statements The following consolidated financial statements of Team, Inc. and its subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets—May 31, 2004 and 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations—Years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . . . Page 15 16 17 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—Years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity—Years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended May 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 20 21 2. Financial Statement Schedules All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto. 38 3. Exhibits Exhibit Number 3.1* 3.2* 4.1* 10.1*# 10.2* 10.3# 10.4*# 10.5*# 10.6*# 10.7*# 10.8*# 10.9*# 10.10*# 10.11*# Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended through August 31, 1999, (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1999). Bylaws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-2, File No. 33-31663). Certificate representing shares of common stock of Company (filed as Exhibit 4(1) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-68928). Employment Agreements and Consulting and Salary Continuation Agreements between the Company and certain of its executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10(f) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1988, as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 1989, as amended by Form 8 dated October 19, 1989, and Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 1990). Team, Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (filed as Exhibit 99(a) to the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-8, File No. 333-74062). Team, Inc. Restated Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan as amended through June 24, 2004. First Amendment to the Consulting and Salary Continuation Agreement by and between Team, Inc. and George W. Harrison dated December 24, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended November 30, 1996). First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. effective October 1, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2002). Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. dated November 2, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 1998). Standard Restricted Stock Option Award Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. dated November 2, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 1998). First Amendment to Price Vested Restricted Stock Option Award Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. dated October 1, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2002). Second Amendment dated July 11, 2002 to Price Vested Restricted Stock Option Award Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002). Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. dated November 2, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 1998). Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement by and between Philip J. Hawk and Team, Inc. dated October 1, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2002). 10.12* Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Team, Inc. and Houston Post Oak Partners, Ltd. Dated June 9, 1998 (filed as a exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 1998). 39 Exhibit Number 10.13# 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan dated January 29, 1998 as amended through June 24, 2004. 10.14*# Exchange Agreement by and among E. Patrick Manuel, B. Dal Miller and Team, Inc. dated July 5, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002). 10.15* 10.16* 10.17* 10.18* 10.19* 10.20* 10.21# 10.22# 14.1* 21 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Credit Agreement dated August 28, 1998 among Team, NationsBank, N.A. and various Financial Institutions named in the Credit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 9, 1998). Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 1, 2004, by and among Team, Inc., Team Industrial Services, Inc. (“Team Industrial”), Thermal Solutions, Inc. (“TSI”), the TSI shareholders named therein and Michael J. Urban as the shareholder representative (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 16, 2004). Escrow Agreement dated April 15, 2004 by and among Team, Inc., Team Industrial, TSI, the TSI shareholders named therein, Michael J. Urban as the shareholder representative and Compass Bank (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 16, 2004). Amendment No. 9 dated as of April 15, 2004 among Registrant, Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to NationsBank, N.A., and the financial institutions named therein (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 16, 2004). Asset Purchase Agreement dated July 16, 2004 by and among International Industrial Services, Inc., Cooperheat-MQS, Inc., Team Acquisition Corp. and Team, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed, dated July 16, 2004, filed July 20, 2004). Credit Agreement dated August 11, 2004 among Team, Inc., each lender from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 12, 2004). Team, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Option and Award Plan dated June 24, 2004. Consulting Agreement between Team, Inc. and Emmett J. Lescroart dated July 30, 2004. Code of Ethics (filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003). Subsidiaries of the Company. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—KPMG LLP Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Incorporated herein by reference to the respective filing identified above. * # Management contracts and/or compensation plans required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. The Company filed three (3) reports on form 8-K during the fourth quarter. One covering a press release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended February 28, 2004, dated March 17, 2004, and two covering the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc., dated April 2, 2004 and April 16, 2004. 40 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant thereunto duly authorized to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, has duly caused this report August 25, 2004. Team, Inc. By: /s/ PHILIP J. HAWK Philip J. Hawk Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated. /s/ PHILIP J. HAWK (Philip J. Hawk) Chief Executive Officer and Director August 25, 2004 /s/ GEORGE W. HARRISON Director August 25, 2004 (George W. Harrison) /s/ JACK M. JOHNSON, JR. (Jack M. Johnson, Jr.) Director August 25, 2004 /s/ E. THEODORE LABORDE Director August 25, 2004 (E. Theodore Laborde) /s/ E. PATRICK MANUEL Director August 25, 2004 (E. Patrick Manuel) /s/ LOUIS A. WATERS Director August 25, 2004 (Louis A. Waters) /s/ SIDNEY B. WILLIAMS Director August 25, 2004 (Sidney B. Williams) /s/ TED W. OWEN (Ted W. Owen) Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) August 25, 2004 41 Dear Fellow Shareholders, The past year has been exciting and productive for our company. We continue to make further progress with our organic growth initiatives, once again achieving significant improvement in market share, revenues, earnings and profit margins. Team’s net income increased 31% during the past year to the highest level ever. This is a continuation of the consistent progress we have made over the last several years. Our average compound annual growth rate in earn- ings over the past three years and five years has been 27% and 58%, respectively. Consistent with this performance, we were pleased to be recognized in the Fortune Small Business 100 listing of America’s fastest-growing small companies for the third year in a row. We take pride in being one of the highest growth companies in America, regardless of industry. Team took another significant strategic step forward with the recent purchases of Thermal Solutions and the assets of Cooperheat MQS. Together, these two businesses bring Team the #1 market position in both inspection services and field heat treating. As a result of these additions, we expect Team’s total revenues to nearly double over the next twelve months. Beyond the financial benefits, these acquisitions reinforce and support our overall company strategy to capitalize on customer trends to consolidate their industrial service requirements with larger multi-service, multi-location service providers like Team. We also were pleased that our common stock share price nearly doubled over the past year. We believe our continued performance improvement, combined with new initiatives, is attracting the attention of more investors. Despite this price improvement, our trailing P/E ratio remains below overall market averages. We look forward to continued improvement in this area. Operations Highlights For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 17% to $94.5 million. Operating profits for this segment increased 16% to $14.0 million. Overall, the operating profit margin for the year was 15%. The revenues for this segment included $2.5 million in revenues from Thermal Solutions following its acquisition in April 2004. Excluding those revenues, the organic growth from the remainder of the industrial services business was 14% for the full year. The organic growth in the remaining services was broad-based, with double-digit revenue growth in nearly all service lines as a result of continued market penetration with multi-service, multi-plant customer agreements and increased turnaround projects. The Equipment Sales and Rental Business Segment (Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) also had record results for the year. Revenues increased 22% to $13.1 million. Operating profit was $1.2 million, approximately double last year’s results. The strong revenue growth was the result of several major special machine shipments during the second half of the fiscal year. Climax continues to pursue these special machine sales opportunities as a supplement to its standard machine sales and rental offerings. The level of interest in new special machine projects remains high going into the current year. We realize that these results are attributable to a company- wide focus on providing customers with the services and products they need-in a safe, effective, efficient and timely manner. We understand the need to reaffirm the trust and confidence of every customer with each new service or sales opportunity. New Business Acquisitions For the last several years, we have discussed our receptivity to “accelerating” strategic acquisitions, provided they were consistent with our current industrial services strategy and accretive to earnings. In the span of about six months, we completed two purchases that dramatically enhance the profile and outlook for our company. In April 2004, Team completed the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc., the second largest provider of field heat treating services in North America. In August 2004, Team purchased the assets of Cooperheat MQS from a bankruptcy proceeding. Cooperheat MQS is the largest provider of both field heat treating and inspection services in North America. Strategically, both businesses are a great complement to our company. As a result of these acquisitions, Team has entered one new service line, field heat treating, as the industry leader. At the same time, we have substantially expanded our inspection capability from a company with a regional Gulf Coast presence to the market leader with a national presence. Further, both businesses have management and service personnel joining Team that represent an excellent fit with our company. Both of these service lines are solid additions to our multi-service, multi-plant arrangements with many major customers. Financially, we expect service line margins and overall business profitability for these new businesses to reach levels that are on par with Team’s other service lines. Yet, Team was able to purchase these two businesses for a total value of about .5 times revenue, compared to Team’s valuation of about 1.2 times revenue. Obviously, when we can achieve the performance consistent with the expectations above, there should be significant value enhancement opportunity for Team. Financial Results For the fiscal year ending May 31, 2004, revenues were $107.7 million, up 17% from the prior year. Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) increased 26% to $9.7 million. EBIT profit margin improved to 9%. Net income was $5.8 million ($0.69 per share fully diluted), up 31%. Net income profit margin improved to 5.4% for the year. The incremental operating margins (growth in EBIT as a percentage of growth in revenue) for the business, after adjustments for the Thermal Solutions acquisition and other non-cash, non-operating items, was about 18%, reflecting the continuing operating leverage of our business. The high incremental profit margin is a key measure of our ability to continue to achieve profit growth that outpaces revenue growth. Profit margins will continue to receive close scrutiny and focus from all of our managers. Our balance sheet remains strong. At fiscal year end, total stockholders’equity had increased nearly $11 million from the prior year to $42 million. Total debt increased to about $19 million, reflecting the Thermal Solutions acquisition in April 2004. The company’s debt to EBITDA ratio at year-end was about 1.4. Because of this strength in the balance sheet, we were able to fully finance the August 2004 purchase of the assets of Cooperheat-MQS with a new $75 million senior debt facility. After giving effect to the $35 million purchase price and related financing cost, our debt level increased to $56 million and our debt to EBITDA ratio increased to a still comfortable 2.5. * * * Exciting challenges lie ahead in the current year, as we merge the new businesses into the Team family and continue our organic growth initiatives. We appreciate your continuing interest in and support of our company. We are proud of our company, our achievements and the outstanding efforts of our 2000 fellow employees. It is our privilege to be associated with this great team. We all look forward to continued success and improvement in the coming year. Philip J. Hawk Chairman and CEO Kenneth M. Tholan President and COO 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above