U.S. Bancorp Annual Report 2005

Plain-text annual report

USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page A F I V E S TA R S E RV I C E : U P C L O S E 2005 Annual Report and Form 10-K USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page B At U.S. Bancorp, we are committed to delivering the best service possible — in every way. In this Annual Report, we share with you just some of the ways in 2005 that we made improvements, expanded capabilities, developed new services and delivered on our Five Star Service Guarantee, now in its 10th year. Let us show you Five Star Service up close… C O R P O R AT E P R O F I L E : U.S. Bancorp, with total assets of $209 billion at year-end 2005, is the 6th largest ﬁnancial holding company in the United States. Our company operates 2,419 banking offices and 5,003 bank-branded ATMs, and provides a comprehensive line of banking, brokerage, insurance, investment, mortgage, trust and payment services products to consumers, businesses, government entities and institutions. Headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S. Bancorp is the parent company of U.S. Bank. Major lines of business provided by U.S. Bancorp through U.S. Bank and other subsidiaries include Wholesale Banking; Payment Services; Private Client, Trust & Asset Management; and Consumer Banking. More information about these lines of business can be found throughout this report. Visit U.S. Bancorp on the web at usbank.com. USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 1 AK HI Canada NH VT ME MI NY NM OK MS AL GA TX LA PA WV VA NC SC FL MA RI CT NJ DE MD DC United States Sweden Norway Ireland Denmark UK Netherlands Belgium Poland Germany Austria France Spain Italy Specialized Services/Offices Commercial Banking Consumer Banking Corporate Banking Payment Services Private Client, Trust & Asset Management Technology and Operations Services Payment Processing Nationally and in Europe Metropolitan and Community Banking 2,419 banking offices in 24 states 24-Hour Banking 5,003 ATMs: Internet: usbank.com Telephone: 800-USBANKS U . S . B A N C O R P : AT A G L A N C E Ranking Asset size Deposits Loans Earnings per share (diluted) Return on average assets Return on average equity Efficiency ratio Tangible efficiency ratio Customers Primary banking region Bank branches ATMs NYSE symbol At year-end 2005 6th largest U.S. ﬁnancial holding company $209 billion $125 billion $138 billion $2.42 2.21% 22.5% 44.3% 40.8% 13.4 million 24 states 2,419 5,003 USB C O N T E N T S : Selected Financial Highlights Financial Summary Letter to Shareholders Five Star Service Up Close F I N A N C I A L S : Management’s Discussion and Analysis Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Reports of Management and Independent Accountants Five-Year Consolidated Financial Statements Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data Supplemental Financial Data Annual Report on Form 10-K CEO and CFO Certiﬁcations Executive Officers Directors 2 3 4 6 18 62 66 101 104 106 107 110 121 124 126 Corporate Information inside back cover “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This report contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These statements often include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, anticipated future revenue and expenses and the future plans and prospects of U.S. Bancorp. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including changes in general business and economic conditions, changes in interest rates, legal and regulatory developments, increased competition from both banks and non-banks, changes in customer behavior and preferences, effects of mergers and acquisitions and related integration, and effects of critical accounting policies and judgments. These and other risks are described in detail on pages 112 to 116 of this report, which you should read carefully. U.S. BANCORP 1 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 2 S E L E C T E D F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S : Net Income (Dollars in Millions) 9 8 4 , 4 7 6 1 , 4 3 3 7 , 3 8 6 1 , 3 3.00 1.50 Diluted Earnings Per Common Share (In Dollars) 8 1 3 2 9 5 1 6 . . . 1 6 7 . 2 4 . 2 Dividends Declared Per Common Share (In Dollars) 1.40 0 3 2 . 1 0 2 0 5 1 5 8 . . .70 0 5 7 . 0 8 7 . 02 03 04 05 0 01 02 03 04 05 0 01 02 03 04 05 5,000 2,500 0 0 2.4 1.2 5.00 2.50 9 7 4 , 1 01 Return on Average Assets (In Percents) 7 1 . 2 1 2 . 2 9 9 . 1 4 8 . 1 9 8 . 01 02 03 04 05 Net Interest Margin (Taxable-Equivalent Basis) (In Percents) 5 6 . 4 6 4 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 2 . 4 7 9 . 3 0 01 02 03 04 05 Average Assets (Dollars in Millions) 220,000 8 9 1 , 3 0 2 0 3 6 , 7 8 1 3 9 5 , 1 9 1 4 4 9 , 5 6 1 8 4 9 , 1 7 1 110,000 Return on Average Equity (In Percents) 5 . 2 2 4 . . 1 2 2 9 1 3 . 8 1 0 . 9 01 02 03 04 05 Efficiency Ratio (a) (In Percents) 2 . 7 5 8 . 8 4 6 . 5 4 3 . 5 4 3 . 4 4 01 02 03 04 05 24 12 60 30 0 0 Average Shareholders’ Equity (Dollars in Millions) 25,000 12,500 6 2 4 , 6 1 3 7 2 , 7 1 3 9 3 , 9 1 9 5 4 , 9 1 3 5 9 , 9 1 Dividend Payout Ratio (In Percents) 4 . 7 9 3 . 7 4 1 . 4 4 2 . 6 4 2 . 0 5 01 02 03 04 05 Tier 1 Capital (In Percents) 1 . 9 6 . 8 2 . 8 8 . 7 0 . 8 01 02 03 04 05 Total Risk-Based Capital (In Percents) 6 . . 3 4 1 2 1 1 . 3 1 5 . 2 1 9 . 1 1 100 50 0 0 10 5 15 7.5 0 01 02 03 04 05 0 01 02 03 04 05 0 01 02 03 04 05 (a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net. 2 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 3 F I N A N C I A L S U M M A R Y: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2005 2004 2003 Total net revenue (taxable-equivalent basis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,133 $ 12,659 $ 12,530 Noninterest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustments . . . . . . . . . Income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Discontinued operations (after-tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,863 666 2,115 4,489 — 5,785 669 2,038 4,167 — 5,597 1,254 1,969 3,710 23 Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,489 $ 4,167 $ 3,733 2005 v 2004 3.7% 1.3 7.7 7.7 2004 v 2003 1.0% 3.4 12.3 11.6 Per Common Share Earnings per share from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2.45 $ 2.21 $ 1.93 10.9% 14.5% Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations . . . . . . Earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dividends declared per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Book value per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Market value per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average diluted common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.42 2.45 2.42 1.230 11.07 29.89 1,831 1,857 2.18 2.21 2.18 1.020 10.52 31.32 1,887 1,913 1.92 1.94 1.93 .855 10.01 29.78 1,924 1,936 11.0 10.9 11.0 20.6 5.2 (4.6) (3.0) (2.9) 13.5 13.9 13.0 19.3 5.1 5.2 (1.9) (1.2) Financial Ratios Return on average assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.21% 2.17% 1.99% Return on average equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Efficiency ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.5 3.97 44.3 21.4 4.25 45.3 19.2 4.49 45.6 Average Balances Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $133,105 $122,141 $118,362 Investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,103 Earning assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178,425 Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203,198 Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121,001 Total shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,953 43,009 168,123 191,593 116,222 19,459 37,248 160,808 187,630 116,553 19,393 9.0% (2.1) 6.1 6.1 4.1 2.5 3.2% 15.5 4.5 2.1 (.3) .3 Period End Balances Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $137,806 $126,315 $118,235 9.1% 6.8% Allowance for credit losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investment securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,251 39,768 Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209,465 Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124,709 Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,086 2,269 41,481 195,104 120,741 19,539 2,369 43,334 189,471 119,052 19,242 (.8) (4.1) 7.4 3.3 2.8 (4.2) (4.3) 3.0 1.4 1.5 Regulatory capital ratios Tangible common equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.9% 6.4% 6.5% Tier 1 capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total risk-based capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.2 12.5 7.6 8.6 13.1 7.9 9.1 13.6 8.0 U.S. BANCORP 3 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 4 L E T T E R T O S H A R E H O L D E R S : our 2005 results were excellent across a wide range of key measures. I am pleased that we were able to deliver on our promise to produce high-quality earnings and industry- leading returns. At the same time, we maintained superior credit quality and continued to make revenue-producing investments in this corporation. Fellow Shareholders: Industry-leading core earnings and consistent performance We achieved record earnings of $4.5 billion in 2005. This represented $2.42 per diluted share, an 11 percent increase over our 2004 results. This is the fourth consecutive year that we have exceeded our long-term goal of 10 percent earnings per share growth. We also improved upon our industry-leading performance metrics and posted return on average assets of 2.21 percent and return on average equity of 22.5 percent for the year. Our ﬁnancial results reﬂect our ability to execute our strategies for success. These include our long-term targets for earnings per share growth of 10 percent and for return on equity of 20 percent, both of which we exceeded in 2005. Other corporate goals include reducing credit and earnings volatility of the company and continuing to invest for future growth. You will read below more details about our accomplishing these goals. Finally, two overriding goals are to provide high-quality service to every customer and to target 80 percent return of earnings to our shareholders. In the pages to follow, you will see some excellent 4 U.S. BANCORP examples of ways we are changing and growing to enhance customer service. And in the graphs at the top of the next page, you can see that we continue our commitment to creating shareholder value. reduce the company’s risk proﬁle we believe will enable us to minimize the impact of future changes in the economy, keep our credit costs lower than our peers and thereby lower the volatility of operating results. Positive operating leverage and superior efficiency Excluding securities gains and losses and the valuation of our mortgage servicing rights, we grew revenue faster than expense in 2005, thus creating positive operating leverage — a fundamental objective of this corporation. In this ﬁercely competitive and commodity-like banking industry, maintaining superior operating efficiency is critical. This management team is dedicated to maintaining superior operating efficiency, and the year 2005 was no exception, as we obtained a tangible efficiency ratio for the year of 40.8 percent. Achieving our goal of lowering our credit risk proﬁle We are extremely proud of the improvements we have made in the company’s overall risk proﬁle. Our net charge-offs were 51 basis points of average loans in 2005, a continued improvement compared with prior years. Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2005, were $644 million, a 14 percent decrease from the balance at December 31, 2004. The steps we have taken to Continuing to invest in this company We have continued to invest in our company. In particular, the acquisitions we have made in our fee-based businesses over the past few years have allowed us to achieve our earnings objectives while maintaining high returns, despite the pressure on the net interest margin, the challenges of the recent and current interest rate cycle and an incredibly competitive environment. Our continued investments in fee- based businesses, distribution channels and market expansion provide future growth opportunities for U.S. Bancorp. These investments have strengthened our presence and product offerings for the beneﬁt of our entire customer base. We operate with an advanta- geous mix of businesses and have strong market positions in fee-based businesses, particularly merchant processing and corporate trust. We have strategically developed a number of diverse national business lines, which in addition to our powerhouse regional consumer and small business banking, have generated sustainable proﬁtability. USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 5 $700 550 400 250 100 Total Shareholder Return (A $100 investment in U.S. Bancorp in 1995 was worth $611 at year-end 2005) Returning 80% of Earnings to Shareholders (Earnings) $611 U.S. Bancorp $337 S&P Commercial Bank Index $238 S&P 500 Index Retention Return to Shareholders Dividend Payout Share Repurchase 40-50% 80% 30-40% 20% 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 In late 2003, our company made a commitment to return 80 percent of earnings to our shareholders in the form of dividends and share buybacks. In 2005, we returned 90 percent of earnings to our share- holders, and since we originally made that commitment, we have returned 98 percent of our earnings to shareholders. We expect to continue to return 80 plus percent in 2006. As always, we want you to remember that we manage this corporation to increase the value of your investment in U.S. Bancorp. It’s the reason we come to work each day. Jerry A. Grundhofer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer U.S. Bancorp March 7, 2006 Standard & PoorÕ s Rating Services raises ratings on U.S. Bancorp In January 2006, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Ratings Services announced that it has raised the ratings on U.S. Bancorp, including its counterparty credit ratings, to AA-/A-1+ from A+/A-1. S&P also raised its long-term counterparty credit ratings on U.S. Bancorp’s subsidiaries, U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank National Association ND, to AA from AA-. This AA rating is currently the highest rating given by S&P to any domestic bank. We are pleased that our performance and outlook allowed the rating agen- cies to make those ratings increases. Managing this company in a way to make you proud of your investment U.S. Bancorp was ranked as the second most respected banking company in the United States and the 50th most respected company in the world, according to a survey of institutional investors published in the September 12, 2005 edition of Barron’s. The survey ranked the world’s 100 largest companies by market capitalization. Six U.S. banking corporations made the list, with U.S. Bancorp one of only two to make the top 50 ranking. The publication noted that respon- dents to the survey overwhelmingly cited strong management and business strategy as the two most important criteria for ranking corporations on the list. Other criteria included competitive edge, consistent sales and proﬁt growth, ethical business practices and product innovation. Creating shareholder value is always our priority In December 2005, U.S. Bancorp announced a 10 percent increase in the dividend rate on U.S. Bancorp common stock to $1.32 on an annualized basis, or $0.33 on a quarterly basis. The quarterly common stock dividend of $0.33 per common share was payable on January 16, 2006 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 30, 2005. That dividend action represents 34 consecutive years of increasing our dividend. Since 1993, our dividend has shown a compound annual growth rate of 19.6 percent. Our dividend program is an important part of our shareholders’ total return on their investment in U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bancorp, since 1863 through its predecessor companies, has paid a dividend for 143 consecutive years. U.S. BANCORP 5 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 6 W H O L E S A L E B A N K I N G : New one-stop treasury management product enhances efficiency our business customers told us what’s most important to them when it comes to treasury management — the highest levels of convenience, ﬂexibility, control and speed. We listened and responded, investing signiﬁcant resources and technology into an exciting new product called U.S. Bank SinglePoint.® Combining powerful monitoring, payment, image access and administrative features, SinglePoint is a complete suite of treasury management services delivered through one integrated website. U.S. Bank treasury management customers now have a simpliﬁed, single point of access — one online portal — to the data and tools they need. With SinglePoint, treasury management customers can conveniently monitor account activity — from broad trends to single transactions — for better insight into cash ﬂow. Enhanced access to check images enables tighter control over ﬁnances and improves fraud prevention, while extensive audit reporting tracks user access to help keep data and accounts secure. Plus, by providing a central hub for all electronic payment activities, SinglePoint increases money transfer efficiency. We’re helping our customers get to the point of all their treasury management needs — with U.S. Bank SinglePoint. ® 6 U.S. BANCORP K E Y B U S I N E S S U N I T S : Middle Market Commercial Banking Commercial Real Estate National Corporate Banking Correspondent Banking Dealer Commercial Services Community Banking Equipment Leasing Foreign Exchange Government Banking International Banking Specialized Industries Specialty Lending Treasury Management USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 7 U.S. Bank provides our wholesale banking customers with the expert knowledge, ﬂexible products and comprehensive service they need to execute their ﬁnancial strategies. Large corporations, middle market businesses, ﬁnancial institutions, private sector customers and government entities drive growth in our economy, and we proudly serve as their ﬁnancial partner. We’re continually improving our lending, depository, treasury management and other ﬁnancial offerings to exceed our wholesale banking customers’ service expectations. Above: In 2005, U.S. Bank launched SinglePoint, which was created from the perspective of our wholesale banking customer. Left: We worked closely with treasurers, cash managers, controllers and other users through interviews and test-runs to identify the features and functionality most important to them, and then incorporated that feedback into the SinglePoint design. U.S. BANCORP 7 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 8 PAY M E N T S E R V I C E S : Merchant processing expands global footprint one of our best opportunities for revenue growth is to leverage our position in payments. Electronic payment products have become more widely accepted worldwide and represent the potential to drive signiﬁcant revenue growth. The acquisition of payments businesses and portfolios has been a strategic focus of U.S. Bancorp, as they add capability, increase scale and give our company an advantaged position in high-value, high-growth businesses. U.S. Bank’s growth in payments acquisitions led the industry in 2005, far outnumbering those of our peer banks. Among our major transactions was the acquisition of Citibank Card Acceptance in Europe. NOVA Information Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp, is a leader in the payment processing industry. Combined, NOVA and its affiliates euroConex and Elan provide global merchant processing services to more than 800,000 customers in the U.S., Canada and Europe. In 2005, NOVA processed more than one billion transactions worldwide. U.S. Bank successfully combines information technology, business management and customer service in payment services, as well as throughout all of our lines of business. In November 2005, U.S. Bank won CIO magazine’s 14th Annual CIO Enterprise Value Award in the banking and brokerage category. U.S. Bank won for Access Online, an electronic program management tool used by major corporations and government agencies, and created by U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems. K E Y B U S I N E S S U N I T S : Corporate Payment Systems Merchant Payment Services NOVA Information Systems, Inc. Card Services: Debit, Credit, Specialty Cards and Gift Cards Transactions Services: ATM Driving and Servicing 8 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 9 Recent acquisitions have expanded our merchant processing globally. At year-end 2005, euroConex acquired Citibank Card Acceptance, a part of Citigroup, Inc., and added 100,000 new merchant locations in more than 30 countries, including Ireland, the U.K., Spain, France, Belgium, Italy, Germany, Poland, Austria, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden, raising the company’s total pan-European portfolio to more than 200,000 merchant locations. Left: U.S. Bancorp is providing bank partners and merchants across Europe with a greater array of payment processing services, including cross-border acquiring, multi-currency processing and dynamic currency conversion solutions. Below: The transaction doubled our merchant count in Europe and is an investment in a business with great growth potential. U.S. BANCORP 9 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 10 P R I VAT E C L I E N T, T R U S T A N D A S S E T M A N A G E M E N T: Corporate trust and institutional custody growth solidiﬁes our leadership u.s. bank is a recognized national leader in the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses — the largest trustee in the area of tax-exempt debt, the second largest in the area of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, the third largest in new corporate bond issuances, and the ninth-largest institutional custody provider. U.S. Bank recently solidiﬁed this top tier position with the acquisition of a major corporate trust and institutional custody portfolio. As a result of the transaction, which closed on December 30, 2005, U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Services acquired approximately 14,100 new client issuances and $410 billion in assets under administration, and U.S. Bank Institutional Trust & Custody acquired approximately 1,700 new clients and $570 billion in assets under administration. This transaction strongly complements our existing corporate trust and institutional custody businesses, making us more competitive by increasing our scale and leveraging our existing capabilities and operational platforms. In addition to serving the specialized needs of our corporate trust and institutional custody customers, U.S. Bancorp continues to enhance our top-notch service delivery to affluent individuals and families, professional service corporations and nonproﬁt organizations through The Private Client Group. Acting as a bank within a bank, The Private Client Group works to build, manage and preserve our customers’ wealth by providing expert planning, programs and advice. K E Y B U S I N E S S U N I T S : The Private Client Group Corporate Trust Services Institutional Trust & Custody U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC 10 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 11 Our recent acquisition of a major corporate trust and institutional custody portfolio reﬂects our acquisition strategy to grow revenue and create businesses capable of competing with anyone. This addition expanded our presence primarily in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern states. Above: From Wall Street to the West Coast, U.S. Bank delivers full value to our customers and prospects. Shown here is (center) U.S. Bank corporate trust customer Christopher Schoen, Managing Director in Mortgage Finance at Credit Suisse, with Edward Kachinski, Senior Vice President, Business Development, and Barbara Nastro, Vice President, Business Development, of our New York City corporate trust office. Left: U.S. Bank customers beneﬁt from the signiﬁcant scale of our national resources, which are delivered by local relationship managers who have a highly sophisticated understanding of area market needs. U.S. BANCORP 11 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 12 C O N S U M E R B A N K I N G : Small Business Service Center streamlines service delivery we listen to our customers. When our small business banking customers said they wanted a one-stop resource for all their special banking needs and questions, we immediately began the development of our Small Business Service Center. We created a model that tackled such issues as staffing with a team of experts, ensuring the highest level of product knowledge, taking full ownership of issues, and one-and-done problem resolution, among others. The system is designed to make banking smooth and effortless for these valuable customers. Diverse customer service groups within the bank that may previously have worked separately now are pulled together and collaborate through the Service Center. Communication with customers has increased, and customer satisfaction scores in the pilot markets have improved signiﬁcantly. Based on the success of our Denver pilot program, the Small Business Service Center program has been expanded throughout Colorado and into the St. Louis marketplace. Expansion into additional markets is planned for 2006 to ensure that we are delivering Five Star Service to all of our small business banking customers. K E Y B U S I N E S S U N I T S : 24-Hour Banking & Financial Sales Business Equipment Finance Community Banking Community Development Consumer Lending Home Mortgage In-store and Corporate On-site Banking Investments and Insurance Metropolitan Branch Banking Small Business Banking SBA Division Workplace and Student Banking 12 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 13 U.S. Bank is proud to be a leader in small business banking across our primary 24-state footprint. Small businesses are crucial to our nation’s economy — and to the very existence of cities and towns across our country. Nearly 90% of the country’s 5.6 million employers have fewer than 20 workers. And these small businesses create 75% of new jobs. Banks are the single most important source of ﬁnancing for most small businesses, and we take that responsibility seriously. U.S. Bank provides a wide range of ﬁnancial products and services to meet the unique needs of small business owners, including deposit and investment accounts; credit in the form of loans, lines, leases, cards and SBA lending; cash management and insurance products. Above: U.S. Bank Small Business customer, Tina Stoeberl, owner of College Hill Coffee Co. and Casual Gourmet in Cincinnati, greets a customer at her inviting new coffee shop. Left: Lori Hamilton, operations manager of the U.S. Bank Small Business Service Center in Colorado. U.S. BANCORP 13 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 14 C O N S U M E R B A N K I N G : On-site banking promotes powerful ﬁnancial partnerships as a r e c o g n i z e d i n du s t ry l e a d e r i n on-site banking, U.S. Bank offers full-service branches inside corporate headquarters, healthcare facilities, university campuses, retirement centers, airport malls and other specialized locations. Our on-site banking branches set the standard for convenient and accessible service, bringing comprehensive banking options directly to our customers. Every U.S. Bank on-site branch location is speciﬁcally tailored to meet the unique ﬁnancial needs of the customers located at the site — through dedicated management and support services, ﬂexible marketing and merchandising, customized sales efforts and specialized training. The partnership doesn’t stop there. In addition to meeting the needs of our customers by bringing a full range of banking options right to them, we’re providing our corporate customers with a valuable, exclusive beneﬁt they can offer their employees and patrons — a convenient U.S. Bank on-site branch office. U.S. Bank continues to invest in our highly successful in-store banking business — which delivers all the access of traditional branches to our customers inside grocery and convenience stores — through expansion in fast-growing markets, making ours the third largest in-store network in the industry. With a full range of banking options, extended hours and convenient locations, U.S. Bank is committed to powerful on-site and in-store banking partnerships. K E Y B U S I N E S S U N I T S : 24-Hour Banking & Financial Sales Business Equipment Finance Community Banking Community Development Consumer Lending Home Mortgage In-store and Corporate On-site Banking Investments and Insurance Metropolitan Branch Banking Small Business Banking SBA Division Workplace and Student Banking 14 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 15 The potential for growth in on-site banking is tremendous. U.S. Bank currently operates 55 on-site branches, leading the industry with our commitment to bring comprehensive banking services to locations where customers need them most. Our expertise in this arena and proven track record of successful partnerships enhances our ability to attract new corporate customers and positions U.S. Bank to leverage our existing corporate relationships. Left: U.S. Bank on-site customers save time by banking at work, save money with special on-site offers, and enjoy free consultations and ﬁnancial seminars. Below: Our on-site branch located at the Minneapolis corporate headquarters of Best Buy, North America’s number-one specialty retailer of consumer electronics, personal computers, entertainment software and appliances. U.S. BANCORP 15 USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 16 C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T: U.S. Bancorp invests in our communities through active leadership, employee volunteerism, and ﬁnancial support. By helping to build strong, vibrant communities, we’re building a healthy marketplace for our company and fostering neighborhoods where businesses succeed and people want to live and work. We do this by investing in affordable housing, economic opportunity, education, arts and culture, and community service initiatives. By devoting time, talent and money to projects, programs and organizations focused on invigorating our communities, we provide residents and businesses with access to opportunities that will enable them to thrive and prosper. U.S. Bancorp provides superior, competitive products to every customer we serve. In addition, we help customers and businesses overcome challenging ﬁnancial situations through customized ﬁnancial solutions. U.S. Bancorp provides loans and investments to help build, rehabilitate and ﬁnance affordable housing units throughout our corporate footprint. U.S. Bancorp also helps communities foster economic growth and revital- ization by providing loans, grants and investments to small businesses and other entities in support of projects and organizations designed to create jobs and rehabilitate communities. U.S. Bancorp Foundation 2005 Charitable Contributions by Program Area 18% 3% 23% Arts & Culture Civic & Community Economic Opportunity Education Foundation Programs 27% 7% Health & Human Services 22% Through the U.S. Bancorp Foundation, we provide cash contributions to nonproﬁt organizations in support of affordable housing, economic opportunities, education and artistic and cultural enrichment. In 2005, total charitable contributions from the U.S. Bancorp Foundation exceeded $21 million. Through volunteer efforts, U.S. Bancorp employees are providing their expertise, time and talents to help improve our communities. The U.S. Bank Development Network, comprised of 50 geographically based chapters, provides a forum where our employees engage in community service activities, mentoring opportunities, charitable fundraising drives and more. In 2005, U.S. Bancorp recognized 250 of our most exceptional employee volunteers through the U.S. Bank Five Star Volunteer Award program. In addition to recognition as outstanding volunteers, winners were honored through a $1,000 contribution to their volunteer organizations. 16 U.S. BANCORP U.S. Bank connects our communities with opportunities. Recently, U.S. Bank provided community development loans totaling almost $5.6 million for the construction and permanent ﬁnancing of Seniors on Broadway. This new 42-unit affordable housing and retail development is located adjacent to the Chula Vista Learning Community Charter School in San Diego County. The program helps create a valuable link between seniors and elementary school students through literacy, technology, art, after-school programs and other inter-generational activities. All units in the complex are affordable to seniors with incomes below 50% of the area median income. Our nonproﬁt partner is MAAC Project, a multi-purpose social service agency with a successful 40-year history of serving various communities throughout San Diego County. USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page 17 F I N A N C I A L R E V I E W 2 0 0 5 : We focus on service, ﬁnancial strength, shareholder value We are proud of the strides we have made in improving customer service — through expansion, added capabilities, new products and services, more offices in more convenient locations — and in delivering the very best we have to offer to every customer, every time. We are pleased that we can show you in this report our Five Star Service up close through ﬁve examples of our initiatives. Our investments in expansion of markets, products, delivery systems and locations inﬂuence our ﬁnancial results greatly. We invite you to read about management’s discussion and analysis of our ﬁnancial results in the following pages. F I N A N C I A L S : Management’s Discussion and Analysis Consolidated Financial Statements Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Reports of Management and Independent Accountants Five-Year Consolidated Financial Statements Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data Supplemental Financial Data Annual Report on Form 10-K CEO and CFO Certiﬁcations Executive Officers Directors 18 62 66 101 104 106 107 110 121 124 126 Corporate Information inside back cover U.S. BANCORP 17 Management’s Discussion and Analysis O V E RV I E W In 2005, U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) continued to demonstrate its ﬁnancial strength and shareholder focus. The Company achieved record earnings in 2005 and grew earnings per share, on a diluted basis, by 11.0 percent despite industry challenges related to rising interest rates. This represents the fourth consecutive year that earnings growth has exceeded the Company’s long- term goal of achieving 10 percent earnings per share growth. The Company continues to meet this goal through its focus on organic growth, investing in business initiatives that strengthen our presence and product offerings for customers, and acquiring fee-based businesses with operating scale. As a result of this focus, the Company’s fee-based revenue grew 9.4 percent over 2004 with growth in most product categories. Fee income growth was led by growth in deposit service charges and revenues generated by payment processing businesses. In addition, average loans outstanding rose 9.0 percent year-over-year despite very competitive credit pricing. In 2006, the Company will continue to focus on revenue growth driven by disciplined strategic business initiatives, customer service and an emphasis on payment processing, ﬁduciary and trust businesses, retail banking and commercial lending. The Company’s performance was also driven by continued improvement in the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolios. During the year, nonperforming assets declined 13.9 percent from a year ago and total net charge-offs decreased to .51 percent of average loans outstanding in 2005, compared with .63 percent in 2004. In 2006, the Company will continue to focus on credit quality and minimizing volatility of credit-related losses. Finally, effectively managing costs is always a goal for the Company and an important factor of ﬁnancial performance. During 2005, the Company’s efﬁciency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to taxable-equivalent net revenue excluding net securities gains or losses) improved to 44.3 percent, compared with 45.3 percent in 2004, and the Company continues to be an industry leader in this category. The Company’s strong performance is also reﬂected in its capital levels and the favorable credit ratings assigned by various credit rating agencies. Equity capital of the Company continued to be strong at 5.9 percent of tangible common assets at December 31, 2005, compared with 6.4 percent at December 31, 2004. In 2005, credit ratings for the Company were upgraded by Moody’s Investors Service. On January 27, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services upgraded the Company’s credit ratings to AA–/A- 1+. Standard & Poor’s also upgraded the Company’s primary banking subsidiaries to an AA long-term debt 18 U.S. BANCORP rating. Credit ratings assigned by various credit rating agencies reﬂect the rating agencies’ recognition of the Company’s sector-leading earnings performance and lower credit risk proﬁle. In concert with achieving stated ﬁnancial objectives, the Company exceeded its objective to return at least 80 percent of earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases by returning 90 percent of 2005 earnings to shareholders. In December 2005, the Company further increased its cash dividend, resulting in a 10 percent increase from the dividend rate in the fourth quarter of 2004. Throughout 2005, the Company continued to repurchase shares under its share repurchase program. The Company continues to afﬁrm its goal of returning at least 80 percent of earnings to shareholders. During 2006, the Company will also continue its focus on its ﬁnancial objectives of strong earnings growth, creating operating leverage and a strong credit risk proﬁle, as well as its ﬁve- star customer service to further strengthen customer loyalty. Earnings Summary The Company reported net income of $4.5 billion in 2005, or $2.42 per diluted share, compared with $4.2 billion, or $2.18 per diluted share, in 2004. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 2.21 percent and 22.5 percent, respectively, in 2005, compared with returns of 2.17 percent and 21.4 percent, respectively, in 2004. Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis for 2005, was $474 million (3.7 percent) higher than 2004 despite the adverse impact of rising interest rates on product margins generally experienced by the banking industry. The increase in net revenue was comprised of a 9.5 percent increase in noninterest income and a .7 percent decline in net interest income. The increase in noninterest income was driven by 9.4 percent growth in fee-based revenue across the majority of fee categories and expansion in payment processing businesses from a year ago. The decline in net interest income reﬂected growth in average earning assets, more than offset by lower net interest margins. In 2005, average earning assets increased $10.3 billion (6.1 percent), compared with 2004, primarily due to growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. The net interest margin in 2005 was 3.97 percent, compared with 4.25 percent in 2004. The year-over-year decline in net interest margin reﬂected narrower credit spreads due to the competitive lending environment, the mix of growth in lower-spread ﬁxed-rate credit products and the impact of changes in the yield curve from a year ago. The net interest margin also declined due to share repurchases during the year, funding incremental growth with higher cost wholesale funding, and asset/liability decisions given rising shorter-term interest rates. Slightly higher loan fees and the increasing margin beneﬁt of deposits and net free funds partially offset the impact of these factors during the year. Total noninterest expense in 2005 increased $78 million (1.3 percent), compared with 2004. Noninterest expense reﬂected incremental costs related to expanding the payment processing businesses, investments in in-store branches (branches located within grocery stores) and service-related business initiatives, expenses related to investments in affordable housing or other similar tax- advantaged development projects and higher medical and pension costs from a year ago. These incremental expenses were partially offset by a favorable change in impairment charges related to the mortgage servicing rights (‘‘MSRs’’) portfolio of $110 million due to changing longer-term interest rates and a $101 million reduction in debt prepayment charges, compared with 2004. The efﬁciency ratio (the ratio of noninterest expense to taxable-equivalent net revenue excluding net securities gains or losses) was 44.3 percent in 2005, compared with 45.3 percent in 2004. The improvement in the efﬁciency ratio reﬂected these Table 1 S E L E C T E D F I N A N C I A L D ATA Year Ended December 31 (Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) Condensed Income Statement Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) (a) **************** Noninterest income****************************************** Securities gains (losses), net ********************************** Total net revenue **************************************** Noninterest expense***************************************** Provision for credit losses ************************************ Income from continuing operations before taxes ************* Taxable-equivalent adjustment ******************************** Applicable income taxes ************************************* Income from continuing operations ************************* Discontinued operations (after-tax)***************************** Cumulative effect of accounting change (after-tax) *************** Net income ********************************************* 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 $ 7,088 6,151 (106) $ 7,140 5,624 (105) $ 7,217 5,068 245 13,133 5,863 666 6,604 33 2,082 4,489 — — 12,659 5,785 669 6,205 29 2,009 4,167 — — 12,530 5,597 1,254 5,679 28 1,941 3,710 23 — $ 6,847 4,911 300 12,058 5,740 1,349 4,969 33 1,708 3,228 (23) (37) $ 6,405 4,340 329 11,074 6,149 2,529 2,396 54 818 1,524 (45) — $ 4,489 $ 4,167 $ 3,733 $ 3,168 $ 1,479 Per Common Share Earnings per share from continuing operations ****************** Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations *********** Earnings per share ****************************************** Diluted earnings per share *********************************** Dividends declared per share ********************************* Book value per share **************************************** Market value per share ************************************** Average common shares outstanding ************************** Average diluted common shares outstanding ******************* $ 2.45 2.42 2.45 2.42 1.230 11.07 29.89 1,831 1,857 $ 2.21 2.18 2.21 2.18 1.020 10.52 31.32 1,887 1,913 $ 1.93 1.92 1.94 1.93 .855 10.01 29.78 1,924 1,936 $ 1.68 1.68 1.65 1.65 .780 9.62 21.22 1,916 1,925 $ .79 .79 .77 .76 .750 8.58 20.93 1,928 1,940 Financial Ratios Return on average assets ************************************ Return on average equity ************************************ Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) ******************* Efﬁciency ratio (b) ******************************************* Average Balances Loans ***************************************************** Loans held for sale ****************************************** Investment securities **************************************** Earning assets********************************************** Assets***************************************************** Noninterest-bearing deposits ********************************* Deposits *************************************************** Short-term borrowings *************************************** Long-term debt ********************************************* Shareholders’ equity***************************************** Period End Balances Loans ***************************************************** Allowance for credit losses *********************************** Investment securities **************************************** Assets***************************************************** Deposits *************************************************** Long-term debt ********************************************* Shareholders’ equity***************************************** Regulatory capital ratios Tangible common equity ********************************** Tier 1 capital ******************************************** Total risk-based capital *********************************** Leverage *********************************************** 2.21% 22.5 3.97 44.3 2.17% 21.4 4.25 45.3 1.99% 19.2 4.49 45.6 1.84% 18.3 4.65 48.8 .89% 9.0 4.46 57.2 $133,105 1,795 42,103 178,425 203,198 29,229 121,001 19,382 36,141 19,953 $137,806 2,251 39,768 209,465 124,709 37,069 20,086 $122,141 1,608 43,009 168,123 191,593 29,816 116,222 14,534 35,115 19,459 $126,315 2,269 41,481 195,104 120,741 34,739 19,539 $118,362 3,616 37,248 160,808 187,630 31,715 116,553 10,503 33,663 19,393 $118,235 2,369 43,334 189,471 119,052 33,816 19,242 $114,453 2,644 28,829 147,410 171,948 28,715 105,124 10,116 32,172 17,273 $116,251 2,422 28,488 180,027 115,534 31,582 18,436 $118,177 1,911 21,916 143,501 165,944 25,109 104,956 11,679 26,088 16,426 $114,405 2,457 26,608 171,390 105,219 28,542 16,745 5.9% 8.2 12.5 7.6 6.4% 8.6 13.1 7.9 6.5% 9.1 13.6 8.0 5.7% 8.0 12.4 7.7 5.9% 7.8 11.9 7.9 (a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent. (b) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net. U.S. BANCORP 19 changes and the Company’s ability to generate operating leverage within its businesses. The provision for credit losses was $666 million for 2005, a decrease of $3 million (.4 percent) from 2004 due to improving credit quality reﬂected in lower levels of nonperforming loans, somewhat offset by the effects of a $56 million provision recorded in 2005 for charge-offs related to new bankruptcy legislation that became effective in October, 2005. Signiﬁcant Acquisitions On December 30, 2005, the Company acquired the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses of Wachovia Corporation in a cash transaction valued at $720 million initially with an additional $80 million payable in one year based on business retention levels. As a result of this transaction, the Company acquired approximately 14,100 new Corporate Trust client issuances with $410 billion in assets under administration and approximately 1,700 new Institutional Trust and Custody clients with $570 billion in assets under administration. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $730 million and liabilities assumed of $10 million at the closing date. Included in total assets were contract and other intangibles with an estimated fair value of $227 million and goodwill of $500 million. The goodwill reﬂected the strategic value of the combined organization’s leadership position in the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses and economies of scale resulting from the transaction. Refer to Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding business combinations and discontinued operations. Table 2 A N A LY S I S O F N E T I N T E R E S T I N C O M E S TAT E M E N T O F I N C O M E A N A LY S I S Net Interest Income Net interest income, on a taxable- equivalent basis, was $7.1 billion in 2005, $7.1 billion in 2004 and $7.2 billion in 2003. Net interest income declined $52 million in 2005, reﬂecting growth in average earning assets, more than offset by lower net interest margins. Average earning assets were $178.4 billion for 2005, compared with $168.1 billion and $160.8 billion for 2004 and 2003, respectively. The $10.3 billion (6.1 percent) increase in average earning assets for 2005, compared with 2004, was primarily driven by increases in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. The net interest margin in 2005 was 3.97 percent, compared with 4.25 percent and 4.49 percent in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 28 basis point decline in the 2005 net interest margin, compared with 2004, reﬂected the current competitive lending environment, asset/liability management decisions and the impact of changes in the yield curve from a year ago. Compared with 2004, credit spreads have tightened by approximately 19 basis points in 2005 across most lending products due to competitive pricing and a change in mix due to growth in lower-spread, ﬁxed-rate credit products. The net interest margin also declined due to the impact of share repurchases, funding incremental growth of earning assets with higher cost wholesale funding, and asset/liability management decisions designed to minimize the Company’s rate sensitivity position, including issuing longer-term ﬁxed-rate debt and a reduction in the Company’s net receive-ﬁxed interest rate swap position of 18.3 percent since December 31, 2004. (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 Components of net interest income Income on earning assets (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)******** Expense on interest-bearing liabilities *********************** $ 10,584 3,496 $ 9,215 2,075 $ 9,286 2,069 Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) ******************* $ 7,088 $ 7,140 $ 7,217 Net interest income, as reported ****************************** $ 7,055 $ 7,111 $ 7,189 Average yields and rates paid Earning assets yield (taxable-equivalent basis) *************** Rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities ********************** Gross interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) ***************** Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) ******************* Average balances 5.93% 2.37 3.56% 3.97% 5.48% 1.53 3.95% 4.25% 5.77% 1.60 4.17% 4.49% Investment securities ************************************* Loans ************************************************** Earning assets ****************************************** Interest-bearing liabilities ********************************** Net free funds (b) **************************************** $ 42,103 133,105 178,425 147,295 31,130 $ 43,009 122,141 168,123 136,055 32,068 $ 37,248 118,362 160,808 129,004 31,804 2005 v 2004 2004 v 2003 $ 1,369 1,421 $ $ (52) (56) .45% .84 (.39)% (.28)% $ (906) 10,964 10,302 11,240 (938) $ $ $ (71) 6 (77) (78) (.29)% (.07) (.22)% (.24)% $5,761 3,779 7,315 7,051 264 (a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a federal tax rate of 35 percent. (b) Represents noninterest-bearing deposits, allowance for loan losses, unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, non-earning assets, other noninterest-bearing liabilities and equity. 20 U.S. BANCORP Slightly higher loan fees and the increasing margin beneﬁt of deposits and net free funds partially offset these factors. Average loans in 2005 were higher by $11.0 billion (9.0 percent), compared with 2004, driven by growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans of $3.7 billion (25.9 percent), $3.3 billion (8.4 percent) and $3.3 billion (7.9 percent), respectively. The signiﬁcant growth in residential mortgages was, in part, due to an asset/liability management decision to retain adjustable-rate mortgage production over the last several quarters. Total average commercial real estate loans increased only 2.6 percent, relative to 2004, principally due to higher reﬁnancing activities during the past two years given the interest rate environment. Average investment securities were $906 million (2.1 percent) lower in 2005, compared with 2004. The Company utilizes the investment portfolio as part of its liquidity and asset/liability management practices to minimize structural interest rate and market valuation risks associated with changing interest rates. The reduction in average investment securities in 2005 principally reﬂected maturities and prepayments utilized to fund earning asset growth. It also reﬂected the net impact of repositioning the investment portfolio as part of asset/liability risk management decisions to acquire primarily variable-rate securities to minimize the Company’s rate sensitivity position given the changing rate environment and mix of loan growth. During 2005, the Company received proceeds from prepayments and maturities of securities of $10.3 billion. In response to structural interest rate risk due to changing interest rates and the mix of loan growth, the Company also made decisions to sell $4.3 billion of securities, classiﬁed as available-for-sale, recognizing net securities losses of $106 million. In 2005, approximately $13.2 billion was reinvested in principally adjustable-rate securities, giving consideration to the Company’s asset/liability position. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of approximately 41 percent variable-rate securities. Refer to the ‘‘Interest Rate Risk Management’’ section for further information on the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in interest rates. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2005 were lower by $587 million (2.0 percent), compared with 2004. The year-over-year change in the average balances of noninterest-bearing deposits was impacted by product changes in the Consumer Banking business line. In late 2004, the Company migrated approximately $1.3 billion of noninterest-bearing deposit balances to interest checking accounts as an enhancement to its Silver Elite Checking product. Average branch-based noninterest-bearing deposits in 2005, excluding the migration of certain high-value customers to Silver Elite Checking, were higher by approximately $210 million (1.8 percent), over 2004. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in other areas, including commercial banking and Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, also increased year-over-year. These favorable variances were offset somewhat by expected declines in average noninterest-bearing deposits in corporate banking as these customers utilized their excess liquidity to fund their operations. Average total savings products declined $1.7 billion (2.9 percent) year-over-year, compared with 2004, due to reductions in average money market savings account balances and savings accounts, partially offset by higher interest checking balances. During 2005, average branch- based interest checking deposits increased by $2.2 billion (14.7 percent) due to strong new account growth of 9.0 percent, as well as the $1.3 billion migration of the Silver Elite Checking product. This positive variance in branch- based interest checking account deposits was partially offset by reductions in other business units. Average money market savings account balances declined year-over-year by $3.5 billion (10.8 percent), with declines in both the branches and other business lines. The decline was primarily the result of deposit pricing by the Company for money market products in relation to other ﬁxed-rate deposit products offered. A portion of the money market balances have migrated to time deposits greater than $100,000 as rates increased on the time deposit products. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 grew $7.0 billion (51.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, most notably in corporate banking, as customers migrated balances to higher rate deposits. The decline in net interest income in 2004, compared with 2003, reﬂected modest growth in average earning assets, more than offset by lower net interest margins. Also contributing to the year-over-year decline was a $38 million reduction in loan fees, the result of fewer loan prepayments in a rising rate environment. The $7.3 billion (4.5 percent) increase in average earning assets for 2004, compared with 2003, was primarily driven by increases in residential mortgages, retail loans and investment securities, partially offset by a decline in commercial loans and loans held for sale related to mortgage banking activities. The decline in average commercial loans reflected soft loan demand in 2003 and through the third quarter of 2004. The 24 basis point decline in 2004 net interest margin, compared with 2003, primarily reflected the competitive credit pricing environment, a preference to acquire adjustable-rate securities which have lower yields and a decline in prepayment fees. The net interest margin was also impacted by a modest increase in the percent of total earning assets funded by wholesale sources of funding and higher interest rates paid on wholesale funding due to the impact of rising rates. In addition, the net interest margin declined year-over-year as a U.S. BANCORP 21 result of consolidating high credit quality, low margin loans from a commercial loan conduit previously maintained by the Company onto the Company’s balance sheet beginning in the third quarter of 2003. Average loans in 2004 were $3.8 billion (3.2 percent) higher than in 2003, reﬂecting growth in residential mortgages, retail loans and commercial real estate loans of $2.6 billion (22.5 percent), $3.0 billion (7.9 percent) and $.1 billion (.5 percent), respectively. Growth in these categories was offset somewhat by an overall decline in average commercial loans of $2.0 billion (4.8 percent). Average investment securities were $5.8 billion (15.5 percent) higher in 2004, compared with 2003, reﬂecting the reinvestment of proceeds from declining average commercial loan balances and loans held for sale. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2004 were lower by $1.9 billion (6.0 percent), compared with 2003. While average branch-based noninterest-bearing deposits increased by 2.7 percent from 2003, mortgage-related escrow balances and business-related noninterest-bearing deposits, including corporate banking, mortgage banking and government deposits, declined. Average interest-bearing deposits were higher by $1.6 billion (1.8 percent), compared with 2003. The year-over-year increase in average interest- bearing deposits included increases in average savings products deposits of $2.6 billion (4.6 percent) and time deposits greater than $100,000 of $1.4 billion (11.0 percent), partially offset by a decrease in time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 of $2.4 billion (15.6 percent). The decrease in time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 was primarily due to pricing decisions by management in connection with the Company’s overall funding and risk management activities. Average net free funds increased $.3 billion in 2004, compared with 2003, including a decrease in average noninterest-bearing deposits, other liabilities and other assets of $1.9 billion (6.0 percent), $1.3 billion (16.7 percent) and $3.1 billion (10.5 percent), respectively. The decrease in other assets and liabilities principally reﬂected the impact of the spin-off of Piper Jaffray Companies. Provision for Credit Losses The provision for credit losses is recorded to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on factors discussed in the ‘‘Analysis and Determination of Allowance for Credit Losses’’ section. The provision for credit losses was $666 million in 2005, compared with $669 million and $1,254 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in the provision for credit losses of $3 million (.4 percent) in 2005 reﬂected improving levels of nonperforming loans resulting in lower total net charge-offs Table 3 N E T I N T E R E S T I N C O M E — C H A N G E S D U E T O R AT E A N D V O L U M E ( a ) (Dollars in Millions) Increase (decrease) in Interest income 2005 v 2004 2004 v 2003 Volume Yield/Rate Total Volume Yield/Rate Total Investment securities********************* Loans held for sale ********************** Commercial loans *********************** Commercial real estate ******************* Residential mortgages******************** Retail loans ***************************** Total loans ************************** Other earning assets********************* Total******************************** Interest expense Interest checking ************************ Money market accounts ****************** Savings accounts *********************** Time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 **************************** Time deposits greater than $100,000 ****** Total interest-bearing deposits ********* Short-term borrowings ******************* Long-term debt ************************* Total******************************** $ (39) 11 185 39 211 207 642 4 618 6 (25) — 3 123 107 88 27 222 Increase (decrease) in net interest income*** $396 $ 165 4 103 222 (22) 273 576 6 751 58 148 — 45 297 548 339 312 $ 126 15 288 261 189 480 1,218 10 1,369 64 123 — 48 420 655 427 339 1,199 $ (448) 1,421 $ (52) $ 263 (112) (111) 7 160 210 266 (14) 403 8 5 1 (70) 25 (31) 64 35 68 $(124) 1 9 (49) (61) (264) (365) 14 (474) (21) (88) (7) (40) (6) (162) 32 68 (62) $ 139 (111) (102) (42) 99 (54) (99) — (71) (13) (83) (6) (110) 19 (193) 96 103 6 $ 335 $(412) $ (77) (a) This table shows the components of the change in net interest income by volume and rate on a taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent. This table does not take into account the level of noninterest-bearing funding, nor does it fully reﬂect changes in the mix of assets and liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in volume or rates has been allocated on a pro-rata basis to volume and yield/rate. 22 U.S. BANCORP in 2005. Nonperforming loans, principally reﬂecting changes in the quality of commercial and commercial real estate loans, declined $96 million from December 31, 2004. Net charge-offs declined $82 million from 2004, the result of lower gross charge-offs within the commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios. This improvement in commercial and commercial real estate net charge-offs was offset somewhat by higher residential and retail net charge- offs reﬂecting changes in the mix of these portfolios and the impact of recently enacted bankruptcy legislation. In 2004, the decline in the provision for credit losses of $585 million (46.7 percent) reﬂected continuing improvement in the credit quality of the loan portfolio and changing economic conditions. The changes in credit quality were broad-based across most industries resulting in improving credit risk ratings, a decline in nonperforming assets and lower total net charge-offs. Commercial loan demand was soft in most markets within the banking footprint during much of 2003 and 2004. Overall, credit quality of the Company’s portfolios has improved since 2002 due to better economic conditions and enhancements in collection efforts, underwriting and risk management practices. In response to these changes, the Company’s allowance for credit losses has trended downward since 2002. Refer to ‘‘Corporate Risk Proﬁle’’ for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge- offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses. Noninterest Income Noninterest income in 2005 was $6.0 billion, compared with $5.5 billion in 2004 and $5.3 billion in 2003. The $526 million (9.5 percent) increase in 2005 over 2004 was driven by strong organic growth in the majority of fee income categories, particularly payment processing revenues and deposit service charges. The growth in credit and debit card revenue of 9.9 percent was principally driven by higher customer transaction volumes and rate changes from a year ago. The corporate payment products revenue growth of 19.9 percent reﬂected growth in sales, card usage, rate changes and the recent acquisition of a small aviation card business. ATM processing services revenue was higher by 30.9 percent primarily due to the expansion of the ATM business in May of 2005. Merchant processing services revenue was higher by 14.1 percent in 2005, compared with 2004, reﬂecting an increase in merchant sales volume and business expansion in European markets. The increase in trust and investment management fees was primarily attributable to improved equity market conditions and account growth. Deposit service charges were higher by 15.0 percent year-over-year due to new account growth in the branches and higher transaction-related service activities. The growth in mortgage banking revenue was due to origination fees and gains from higher production volumes and increased servicing income. Other income increased by 24.1 percent from 2004, primarily due to higher income from equity investments and the cash surrender value of insurance products relative to 2004. Partially offsetting these positive variances year-over-year were decreases in treasury management fees and commercial products revenue of 6.4 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively. The decrease in treasury management fees was due to higher earnings credits on customers’ compensating balances, reﬂecting rising interest rates relative to a year ago, partially offset by growth in treasury management-related activities. Commercial products revenue declined due to reductions in non-yield loan fees, syndications and fees for letters of credit. In 2004, noninterest income increased $206 million (3.9 percent), compared with 2003, driven by strong organic growth in most fee-based products and services categories, particularly in payment processing revenue. Table 4 N O N I N T E R E S T I N C O M E (Dollars in Millions) Credit and debit card revenue ********************************** Corporate payment products revenue **************************** ATM processing services *************************************** Merchant processing services *********************************** Trust and investment management fees ************************** Deposit service charges **************************************** Treasury management fees ************************************* Commercial products revenue ********************************** Mortgage banking revenue ************************************* Investment products fees and commissions*********************** Securities gains (losses), net ************************************ Other ******************************************************** 2005 $ 713 488 229 770 1,009 928 437 400 432 152 (106) 593 Total noninterest income ************************************ $6,045 * Not meaningful 2004 $ 649 407 175 675 981 807 467 432 397 156 (105) 478 $5,519 2003 $ 561 361 166 561 954 716 466 401 367 145 245 370 $5,313 2005 v 2004 9.9% 19.9 30.9 14.1 2.9 15.0 (6.4) (7.4) 8.8 (2.6) 1.0 24.1 9.5% 2004 v 2003 15.7% 12.7 5.4 20.3 2.8 12.7 0.2 7.7 8.2 7.6 * 29.2 3.9% U.S. BANCORP 23 Partially offsetting the increase in fee-based revenue growth in 2004 was a year-over-year reduction in net securities gains (losses) of $350 million. The growth in credit and debit card revenue was driven by higher transaction volumes and rate changes. This growth in sales volumes was somewhat muted due to the impact of the settlement of the antitrust litigation brought against VISA USA and MasterCard by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Sears Roebuck & Co. and other retailers, which lowered interchange rates on signature debit transactions beginning in August 2003. The year-over-year impact of VISA’s settlement on debit card revenue for 2004 was approximately $33 million. The corporate payment products revenue growth reﬂected growth in sales, card usage and rate changes. The favorable variance in ATM processing services revenue was also due to increases in transaction volumes and sales. Merchant processing services revenue was higher in 2004, compared with 2003, reﬂecting an increase in same store sales volume, new business and expansion of the Company’s merchant acquiring business in Europe. Deposit service charges increased in 2004 primarily due to account growth, revenue enhancement initiatives and transaction-related fees. Trust and investment management fees increased as gains from equity market valuations were partially offset by lower fees, partially due to a change in mix of fund balances and customers’ migration from money market mutual funds to interest-bearing deposits with marginally better pricing. During 2004, commercial products revenue increased primarily due to syndication fees and commercial leasing revenue. The growth in mortgage banking revenue was due to an increase in loan servicing revenues, offset somewhat by lower gains from the sale of mortgage loan production. Other noninterest income increased principally due to improving retail lease residual values resulting in lower end- of-term residual losses, a residual value insurance recovery of $17 million during 2004 and improving equity investment valuations. Table 5 N O N I N T E R E S T E X P E N S E Noninterest Expense Noninterest expense in 2005 was $5.9 billion, compared with $5.8 billion and $5.6 billion in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The $78 million (1.3 percent) increase in noninterest expenses in 2005, compared with 2004, was primarily driven by production-based incentives and expenses related to business initiatives, including acquisitions investments, acquired businesses, and production-based, offset by a $110 million favorable change in the MSR valuation and a $101 million decrease in debt prepayment charges. Compensation expense was higher by 5.8 percent year-over-year principally due to business expansion, including in-store branches, expanding the Company’s payment processing businesses and other product sales initiatives. Employee beneﬁts increased 10.8 percent, year-over-year, primarily as a result of higher pension expense, medical costs, payroll taxes and other beneﬁts. Professional services expense was higher by 11.4 percent due to increases in legal and other professional services related to business initiatives, technology development and integration costs of speciﬁc payment processing businesses. Marketing and business development expense increased 21.1 percent principally related to brand awareness, credit card and prepaid gift card programs. Technology and communications expense was higher in 2005 by 8.4 percent, reﬂecting depreciation of technology investments, network costs associated with the expansion of the payment processing businesses, and higher outside data processing expense associated with expanding a prepaid gift card program. Other expense declined 1.7 percent primarily due to lower operating and fraud losses and insurance costs, partially offset by increased investments in affordable housing and other tax-advantaged projects and higher merchant processing costs due to the expansion of the payment processing businesses relative to 2004. The noninterest expense increase of $188 million (3.4 percent) in 2004, compared with 2003, principally reﬂected a $155 million charge related to the prepayment of (Dollars in Millions) Compensation ************************************************ Employee beneﬁts********************************************* Net occupancy and equipment********************************** Professional services******************************************* Marketing and business development **************************** Technology and communications ******************************** Postage, printing and supplies ********************************** Other intangibles ********************************************** Debt prepayment ********************************************* Other ******************************************************** 2005 $2,383 431 641 166 235 466 255 458 54 774 Total noninterest expense *********************************** $5,863 2004 $2,252 389 631 149 194 430 248 550 155 787 $5,785 2003 $2,177 328 644 143 180 418 246 682 — 779 $5,597 2005 v 2004 2004 v 2003 5.8% 3.4% 10.8 1.6 11.4 21.1 8.4 2.8 (16.7) (65.2) (1.7) 18.6 (2.0) 4.2 7.8 2.9 .8 (19.4) * 1.0 1.3% 3.4% Efﬁciency ratio (a) ********************************************* 44.3% 45.3% 45.6% (a) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net. * Not meaningful 24 U.S. BANCORP a portion of the Company’s long-term debt, costs related to business initiatives and incremental expenses of $63 million due to the expansion of the Company’s European merchant processing business. These increases were offset somewhat by a net reduction in MSR impairments of $152 million and lower merger and restructuring-related charges. Compensation expense increased due to increases in salaries and stock-based compensation. The increase in salaries reﬂected business expansion of in-store branches, the expansion of the Company’s merchant acquiring business in Europe and other initiatives. Stock-based compensation was higher due to lower employee stock-award forfeitures relative to prior years. Employee beneﬁts increased primarily as a result of higher payroll taxes and pension expense. Marketing and business development increased due to corporate brand advertising and an increase in product marketing campaigns. Technology and communications expense was higher year-over-year, reﬂecting technology investments that increased software amortization and the write-off of capitalized software being replaced. Other expense increased in 2004, compared with 2003, related to higher fraud and operating losses, insurance costs, operating costs associated with affordable housing investments and merchant processing costs for payment services products, the result of the expansion of the payment processing business and increases in transaction volume year-over-year. Pension Plans Because of the long-term nature of pension plans, the administration and accounting for pensions is complex and can be impacted by several factors, including investment and funding policies, accounting methods and the plan’s actuarial assumptions. The Company and its Compensation Committee have an established process for evaluating the plans, their performance and signiﬁcant plan assumptions, including the assumed discount rate and the long-term rate of return (‘‘LTROR’’). At least annually, an independent consultant is engaged to assist the Company’s Compensation Committee in evaluating plan objectives, funding policies and investment policies considering its long-term investment time horizon and asset allocation strategies. Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides further information on funding practices, investment policies and asset allocation strategies. Periodic pension expense (or credits) includes service costs, interest costs based on the assumed discount rate, the expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. The Company’s pension accounting policy follows guidance outlined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, ‘‘Employer’s Accounting for Pension Plans,’’ and reﬂects the long-term nature of beneﬁt obligations and the investment horizon of plan assets. This accounting guidance has the effect of reducing earnings volatility related to short-term changes in interest rates and market valuations. Actuarial gains and losses include the impact of plan amendments and various unrecognized gains and losses which are deferred and amortized over the future service periods of active employees. The actuarially derived market-related value utilized to determine the expected return on plan assets is based on fair value adjusted for the difference between expected returns and actual performance of plan assets. The unrealized difference between actual experience and expected returns is included in the actuarially derived market-related value ratably over a ﬁve- year period. At September 30, 2005, the accumulated unrecognized gain approximated $206 million, compared with an accumulated unrecognized loss of approximately $139 million at September 30, 2004. The impact to pension expense of the unrecognized asset gains or losses will incrementally increase (decrease) pension costs in each year from 2006 to 2010, by approximately $30 million, $(3) million, $(21) million, $(13) million and $(9) million, respectively. This assumes that the performance of plan assets equals the assumed LTROR. Actual results will vary depending on the performance of plan assets and changes to assumptions required in the future. Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s accounting policies for pension plans. In 2005, the Company recognized a pension cost of $33 million compared with a pension cost of $9 million in 2004 and pension credit of $24 million in 2003. The $24 million increase in pension costs in 2005 was driven by recognition of deferred actuarial (gains) losses and the impact of a lower discount rate. In 2004, pension costs increased by $33 million, compared with 2003, driven by a recognition of deferred actuarial (gains) losses and the impact of a lower discount rate, partially offset by the beneﬁt of higher investment income related to pension contributions made in 2003. In 2006, the Company anticipates that pension costs will increase by approximately $48 million. The increase will be primarily driven by the lower discount rate and amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses from prior years, accounting for approximately $12 million and $39 million of the anticipated increase, respectively. U.S. BANCORP 25 Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides a summary of the signiﬁcant pension plan assumptions. Because of the subjective nature of plan assumptions, a sensitivity analysis to hypothetical changes in the LTROR and the discount rate is provided below: LTROR Incremental beneﬁt (cost) ***************************************************************** Percent of 2005 net income ************************************************************** Discount rate Incremental beneﬁt (cost) ***************************************************************** Percent of 2005 net income ************************************************************** 6.9% $ (43) 7.9% $ (22) Base 8.9% $ — 9.9% $ 22 10.9% $ 43 (.59)% (.30)% —% .30% .59% 3.7% $ (91) 4.7% $ (45) Base 5.7% $ — 6.7% $ 40 7.7% $ 75 (1.26)% (.62)% —% .55% 1.04% Due to the complexity of forecasting pension plan activities, the accounting method utilized for pension plans, management’s ability to respond to factors impacting the plans and the hypothetical nature of this information, the actual changes in periodic pension costs could be different than the information provided in the sensitivity analysis. Income Tax Expense The provision for income taxes was $2,082 million (an effective rate of 31.7 percent) in 2005, compared with $2,009 million (an effective rate of 32.5 percent) in 2004 and $1,941 million (an effective rate of 34.3 percent) in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2004 primarily reﬂects higher tax exempt income from investment securities and insurance products and incremental tax credits generated from investments in affordable housing and similar tax-advantaged projects. Table 6 L O A N P O RT F O L I O D I S T R I B U T I O N Included in 2005 was a reduction of income tax expense of $94 million related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for the years 2000 through 2002. Included in 2004 was a reduction in income tax expense of $90 million related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for the years 1995 through 1999 and $16 million related to the resolution of a state tax examination for tax years through 2000. The Company anticipates its effective tax rate for the foreseeable future to approximate 33 percent. For further information on income taxes, refer to Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. At December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Commercial 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Commercial ****************************** $ 37,844 Lease ﬁnancing *************************** 5,098 27.5% $ 35,210 4,963 3.7 27.9% $ 33,536 4,990 3.9 28.4% $ 36,584 5,360 4.2 31.5% $ 40,472 5,858 4.6 35.4% 5.1 Total commercial*********************** 42,942 31.2 40,173 31.8 38,526 32.6 41,944 36.1 46,330 40.5 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages ******************** Construction and development ************** 20,272 8,191 Total commercial real estate ************* 28,463 Residential mortgages Residential mortgages ********************* Home equity loans, ﬁrst liens**************** 14,538 6,192 Total residential mortgages ************** 20,730 Retail Credit card ******************************* Retail leasing ***************************** Home equity and second mortgages********* Other retail Revolving credit************************ Installment **************************** Automobile**************************** Student ****************************** 7,137 7,338 14,979 2,504 3,582 8,112 2,019 Total other retail ******************** 16,217 Total retail***************************** 45,671 14.7 6.0 20.7 10.5 4.5 15.0 5.2 5.3 10.9 1.8 2.6 5.9 1.4 11.7 33.1 20,315 7,270 27,585 9,722 5,645 16.1 5.7 21.8 7.7 4.5 20,624 6,618 27,242 7,332 6,125 17.4 5.6 23.0 6.2 5.2 15,367 12.2 13,457 11.4 6,603 7,166 14,851 2,541 2,767 7,419 1,843 14,570 43,190 5.2 5.7 11.8 2.0 2.2 5.9 1.4 11.5 34.2 5,933 6,029 13,210 2,540 2,380 7,165 1,753 13,838 39,010 5.0 5.1 11.2 2.1 2.0 6.1 1.5 11.7 33.0 20,325 6,542 26,867 6,446 3,300 9,746 5,665 5,680 13,572 2,650 2,258 6,343 1,526 12,777 37,694 17.5 5.6 23.1 5.6 2.8 8.4 4.9 4.9 11.6 2.3 1.9 5.5 1.3 11.0 32.4 18,765 6,608 25,373 5,746 2,083 7,829 5,889 4,906 12,235 2,673 2,292 5,660 1,218 11,843 34,873 16.4 5.8 22.2 5.0 1.8 6.8 5.1 4.3 10.7 2.3 2.0 5.0 1.1 10.4 30.5 Total loans************************* $137,806 100.0% $126,315 100.0% $118,235 100.0% $116,251 100.0% $114,405 100.0% 26 U.S. BANCORP B A L A N C E S H E E T A N A LY S I S Average earning assets were $178.4 billion in 2005, compared with $168.1 billion in 2004. The increase in average earning assets of $10.3 billion (6.1 percent) was primarily driven by growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. The change in average earning assets was principally funded by increases of $5.4 billion in interest-bearing deposits and $5.9 billion in wholesale funding. For average balance information, refer to Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates on pages 108 and 109. Loans The Company’s total loan portfolio was $137.8 billion at December 31, 2005, an increase of $11.5 billion (9.1 percent) from December 31, 2004. The increase in total loans was driven by growth in residential mortgages (34.9 percent), commercial loans (6.9 percent), retail loans (5.7 percent) and commercial real estate loans (3.2 percent). Table 6 provides a summary of the loan distribution by product type while Table 10 provides a summary of selected loan maturity distribution by loan category. Average total loans increased $11.0 billion (9.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. The increase was due to growth in residential mortgages, commercial loans and retail loans. Commercial Commercial loans, including lease ﬁnancing, increased $2.8 billion (6.9 percent) at December 31, 2005, compared with December 31, 2004. The increase in commercial loans was driven by new customer relationships and increases in mortgage banking and corporate card balances. Average commercial loans increased by $3.3 billion (8.4 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, primarily due to an increase in commercial loan demand driven by general economic conditions in 2005. Table 7 provides a summary of commercial loans by industry and geographical locations. Table 7 C O M M E R C I A L L O A N S B Y I N D U S T RY G R O U P A N D G E O G R A P H Y Industry Group (Dollars in Millions) December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 Loans Percent Loans Percent Consumer products and services*********************************************** Financial services ************************************************************ Commercial services and supplies ********************************************** Capital goods *************************************************************** Property management and development **************************************** Agriculture ****************************************************************** Healthcare ****************************************************************** Paper and forestry products, mining and basic materials ************************** Consumer staples************************************************************ Transportation *************************************************************** Private investors ************************************************************* Energy********************************************************************** Information technology******************************************************** Other*********************************************************************** $ 8,723 5,416 4,326 3,881 3,182 2,693 2,064 1,990 1,785 1,565 1,477 842 700 4,298 20.3% 12.6 10.1 9.0 7.4 6.3 4.8 4.6 4.2 3.7 3.4 2.0 1.6 10.0 $ 8,073 4,784 3,870 3,825 2,334 2,601 1,826 1,905 1,887 1,592 1,630 730 644 4,472 20.1% 11.9 9.6 9.5 5.8 6.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.0 4.1 1.8 1.6 11.1 Total ******************************************************************** $42,942 100.0% $40,173 100.0% Geography California******************************************************************** Colorado******************************************************************** Illinois ********************************************************************** Minnesota******************************************************************* Missouri ******************************************************************** Ohio *********************************************************************** Oregon ********************************************************************* Washington ***************************************************************** Wisconsin******************************************************************* Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota **************************** Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee **************************************** Idaho, Montana, Wyoming **************************************************** Arizona, Nevada, Utah ******************************************************** Total banking region ******************************************************* Outside the Company’s banking region ***************************************** $ 3,561 2,578 2,919 6,806 2,056 2,640 1,649 2,404 2,421 3,721 2,214 825 1,163 34,957 7,985 8.3% 6.0 6.8 15.8 4.8 6.2 3.8 5.6 5.6 8.7 5.2 1.9 2.7 81.4 18.6 $ 3,786 2,064 2,549 6,649 2,525 2,528 1,441 2,695 2,604 3,455 1,747 830 926 33,799 6,374 9.4% 5.1 6.3 16.6 6.3 6.3 3.6 6.7 6.5 8.6 4.3 2.1 2.3 84.1 15.9 Total ******************************************************************** $42,942 100.0% $40,173 100.0% U.S. BANCORP 27 Table 8 C O M M E R C I A L R E A L E S TAT E B Y P R O P E RT Y T Y P E A N D G E O G R A P H Y Property Type (Dollars in Millions) Business owner occupied ***************************************************** Multi-family ****************************************************************** Commercial property Industrial***************************************************************** Ofﬁce ******************************************************************* Retail******************************************************************** Other ******************************************************************* Homebuilders**************************************************************** Hotel/motel****************************************************************** Health care facilities ********************************************************** December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 Loans Percent Loans Percent $ 9,221 3,843 32.4% 13.5 $ 8,551 3,903 1,025 2,306 3,558 2,704 3,899 1,423 484 3.6 8.1 12.5 9.5 13.7 5.0 1.7 1,103 2,676 3,586 2,359 2,952 1,848 607 31.0% 14.1 4.0 9.7 13.0 8.6 10.7 6.7 2.2 Total ******************************************************************** $28,463 100.0% $27,585 100.0% Geography California******************************************************************** Colorado******************************************************************** Illinois ********************************************************************** Minnesota******************************************************************* Missouri ******************************************************************** Ohio *********************************************************************** Oregon ********************************************************************* Washington ***************************************************************** Wisconsin******************************************************************* Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota **************************** Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee **************************************** Idaho, Montana, Wyoming **************************************************** Arizona, Nevada, Utah ******************************************************** Total banking region ******************************************************* Outside the Company’s banking region ***************************************** $ 5,806 1,366 1,025 1,765 1,452 1,537 1,736 2,846 1,679 1,935 1,565 1,110 2,362 26,184 2,279 20.4% 4.8 3.6 6.2 5.1 5.4 6.1 10.0 5.9 6.8 5.5 3.9 8.3 92.0 8.0 $ 5,252 1,181 996 1,721 1,525 1,975 1,730 2,855 1,768 2,003 1,710 880 1,948 25,544 2,041 19.0% 4.3 3.6 6.2 5.5 7.2 6.3 10.3 6.4 7.3 6.2 3.2 7.1 92.6 7.4 Total ******************************************************************** $28,463 100.0% $27,585 100.0% Commercial Real Estate The Company’s portfolio of commercial real estate loans, which includes commercial mortgages and construction loans, increased $878 million (3.2 percent) at December 31, 2005, compared with December 31, 2004. Speciﬁcally, construction and development loans increased by $921 million (12.7 percent) as developers continued to take advantage of relatively low interest rates. Commercial mortgages outstanding decreased modestly by $43 million (.2 percent) as growth in Small Business Administration (‘‘SBA’’) real estate mortgages was more than offset by reductions in traditional commercial real estate mortgages due to reﬁnancing activities. Average commercial real estate loans increased by $697 million (2.6 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, primarily driven by growth in construction and development loans. Table 8 provides a summary of commercial real estate by property type and geographical locations. The Company maintains the real estate construction designation until the completion of the construction phase and, if retained, the loan is reclassiﬁed to the commercial mortgage category. Approximately $187 million of construction loans were permanently ﬁnanced and 28 U.S. BANCORP reclassiﬁed to the commercial mortgage loan category in 2005. At year-end 2005, $219 million of tax-exempt industrial development loans were secured by real estate. The Company’s commercial real estate mortgages and construction loans had unfunded commitments of $9.8 billion at December 31, 2005, compared with $7.9 billion at December 31, 2004. The Company also ﬁnances the operations of real estate developers and other entities with operations related to real estate. These loans are not secured directly by real estate and are subject to terms and conditions similar to commercial loans. These loans were included in the commercial loan category and totaled $1.9 billion at December 31, 2005. Residential Mortgages Residential mortgages held in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2005, increased $5.4 billion (34.9 percent) from December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily the result of asset/liability risk management decisions to retain a greater portion of the Company’s adjustable-rate loan production and an increase in consumer ﬁnance originations. Average residential mortgages increased $3.7 billion (25.9 percent) in 2005, primarily due to retaining adjustable-rate residential mortgages beginning in mid-2004. Table 9 R E S I D E N T I A L M O RT G A G E S A N D R E TA I L L O A N S B Y G E O G R A P H Y At December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Loans Percent Loans Percent Residential Mortgages Retail Loans California *********************************************************** Colorado *********************************************************** Illinois************************************************************** Minnesota ********************************************************** Missouri************************************************************ Ohio*************************************************************** Oregon ************************************************************ Washington********************************************************* Wisconsin ********************************************************** Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota ******************* Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee******************************** Idaho, Montana, Wyoming ******************************************** Arizona, Nevada, Utah *********************************************** Total banking region ********************************************** Outside the Company’s banking region********************************* Total************************************************************ Retail Total retail loans outstanding, which include credit card, retail leasing, home equity and second mortgages and other retail loans, increased $2.5 billion (5.7 percent) at December 31, 2005, compared with December 31, 2004. The increase was driven by an increase in automobile loans and installment loans, credit cards, home equity loans, student loans and retail leasing, which increased $1.5 billion, $534 million, $352 million, $176 million and $172 million, respectively, during 2005. The increases in these loan categories were offset somewhat by a reduction in home equity lines of credit of $223 million during the year. Average retail loans increased $3.3 billion (7.9 percent) in 2005, reﬂecting growth in home equity lines, installment loans, retail leasing and credit card. Of the total retail loans and residential mortgages outstanding, approximately 82.8 percent were to customers located in the Company’s primary banking regions. Table 9 provides a geographic summary of residential mortgages and retail loans outstanding as of December 31, 2005. Loans Held for Sale At December 31, 2005, loans held for sale, consisting of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary market, were $1.7 billion, compared with $1.4 billion at December 31, 2004. Average loans held for $ 1,351 1,406 1,402 2,350 1,549 1,487 964 1,245 1,136 1,536 1,570 489 1,161 17,646 3,084 $20,730 6.5% 6.8 6.8 11.3 7.4 7.2 4.6 6.0 5.5 7.4 7.6 2.4 5.6 85.1 14.9 $ 5,292 2,381 2,354 5,026 2,517 3,335 1,986 2,217 2,532 3,125 3,421 1,293 1,833 37,312 8,359 11.6% 5.2 5.2 11.1 5.5 7.3 4.3 4.9 5.5 6.8 7.5 2.8 4.0 81.7 18.3 100.0% $45,671 100.0% sale were $1.8 billion in 2005, compared with $1.6 billion in 2004. The balance of loans held for sale is primarily a function of mortgage loan production during the past ninety days. During the fourth quarter of 2005, mortgage loan production was approximately $6.1 billion compared with $4.4 billion during the same period of 2004. Investment Securities The Company uses its investment securities portfolio for several purposes. It serves as a vehicle to manage interest rate and prepayment risk, generates interest and dividend income from the investment of excess funds depending on loan demand, provides liquidity and is used as collateral for public deposits and wholesale funding sources. While it is the Company’s intent to hold its investment securities indeﬁnitely, the Company may take actions in response to structural changes in the balance sheet and related interest rate risks and to meet liquidity requirements. At December 31, 2005, investment securities, both available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, totaled $39.8 billion, compared with $41.5 billion at December 31, 2004. The $1.7 billion (4.1 percent) decrease primarily reﬂected purchases of $13.2 billion of securities, more than offset by sales, maturities and prepayments. During 2005, Table 10 S E L E C T E D L O A N M AT U R I T Y D I S T R I B U T I O N December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Commercial **************************************************************** Commercial real estate******************************************************* Residential mortgages ******************************************************* Retail ********************************************************************** One Year or Less $18,928 8,076 898 14,005 Total loans ************************************************************** $41,907 Total of loans due after one year with Predetermined interest rates *********************************************** Floating interest rates ***************************************************** Over One Through Five Years $20,717 14,073 2,630 19,845 $57,265 Over Five Years $ 3,297 6,314 17,202 11,821 $38,634 Total $ 42,942 28,463 20,730 45,671 $137,806 $ 44,503 $ 51,396 U.S. BANCORP 29 securities transactions were principally related to asset/liability management decisions. At December 31, 2005, approximately 41 percent of the investment securities portfolio represented adjustable-rate ﬁnancial instruments, compared with 39 percent at December 31, 2004. Adjustable-rate ﬁnancial instruments include variable-rate collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, agency securities, adjustable-rate money market accounts and asset-backed securities. Average investment securities were $.9 billion (2.1 percent) lower in 2005, compared with 2004. The decline principally reﬂected the net impact of repositioning the investment portfolio as part of asset/liability risk management decisions to acquire variable-rate securities. The weighted-average yield of the available-for-sale portfolio was 4.89 percent at December 31, 2005, Table 11 I N V E S T M E N T S E C U R I T I E S Available-for-Sale Held-to-Maturity December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) U.S. Treasury and agencies Amortized Cost Fair Value Weighted- Average Maturity in Years Weighted- Average Yield (c) Amortized Cost Maturing in one year or less***************** Maturing after one year through ﬁve years***** Maturing after ﬁve years through ten years **** Maturing after ten years ******************** $ 101 41 29 325 $ 101 41 30 317 Total ****************************** $ 496 $ 489 Mortgage-backed securities (a) Maturing in one year or less***************** Maturing after one year through ﬁve years***** Maturing after ﬁve years through ten years **** Maturing after ten years ******************** $ 379 20,606 13,629 3,547 $ 381 20,208 13,342 3,583 Total ****************************** $38,161 $37,514 Asset-backed securities (a) Maturing in one year or less***************** Maturing after one year through ﬁve years***** Maturing after ﬁve years through ten years **** Maturing after ten years ******************** Total ****************************** Obligations of state and political subdivisions Maturing in one year or less***************** Maturing after one year through ﬁve years***** Maturing after ﬁve years through ten years **** Maturing after ten years ******************** $ $ $ 12 — — — 12 67 59 231 283 $ $ $ 12 — — — 12 67 61 231 278 Total ****************************** $ 640 $ 637 Other debt securities Maturing in one year or less***************** Maturing after one year through ﬁve years***** Maturing after ﬁve years through ten years **** Maturing after ten years ******************** Total ****************************** Other investments *********************** $ $ $ 301 12 15 626 954 58 $ $ $ 301 12 15 621 949 58 Total investment securities (b) ******************* $40,321 $39,659 .72 2.67 7.34 14.58 10.36 .70 3.61 7.19 13.38 5.77 .74 — — — .74 .31 2.31 9.40 15.49 10.49 .08 1.28 10.00 21.69 14.44 — 6.10 4.63% 5.96 5.65 5.71 5.51% 5.70% 4.65 4.93 5.69 4.86% 5.40% — — — 5.40% 7.28% 7.24 6.42 6.25 6.51% 3.65% 3.82 5.30 5.15 4.66% —% 4.89% $ — — — — $ — $ — 8 — — $ 8 $ — — — — $ — $ 12 23 15 34 $ 84 $ 5 11 1 — Fair Value $ — — — — $ — $ — 8 — — $ 8 $ — — — — $ — $ 12 24 17 35 $ 88 $ 5 11 1 — Weighted- Average Maturity in Years Weighted- Average Yield (c) — — — — — — 3.05 — — 3.05 — — — — — .33 3.30 7.92 15.15 8.51 .57 3.46 6.25 — 2.73 — 7.21 —% — — — —% —% 5.08 — — 5.08% —% — — — —% 6.37% 6.65 7.68 6.57 6.76% 6.16% 5.23 4.15 — 5.45% —% 6.44% $ 17 $ 17 $ — $109 $ — $113 (a) Information related to asset and mortgage-backed securities included above is presented based upon weighted-average maturities anticipating future prepayments. (b) The weighted-average maturity of the available for sale investment securities was 4.45 years at December 31, 2004, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 4.43 percent. The weighted-average maturity of the held-to-maturity investment securities was 6.19 years at December 31, 2004, with a corresponding weighted-average yield of 6.28 percent. (c) Average yields are presented on a fully-taxable equivalent basis under a tax rate of 35 percent. Yields on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are computed based on historical cost balances. Average yield and maturity calculations exclude equity securities that have no stated yield or maturity. (Dollars in Millions) U.S. Treasury and agencies ******************************************** Mortgage-backed securities ******************************************** Asset-backed securities *********************************************** Obligations of state and political subdivisions ***************************** Other debt securities and investments *********************************** Total investment securities ****************************************** 30 U.S. BANCORP 2005 2004 Amortized Cost $ 496 38,169 12 724 1,029 $40,430 Percent of Total 1.2% 94.4 .1 1.8 2.5 100.0% Amortized Cost $ 684 39,820 64 303 881 $41,752 Percent of Total 1.6% 95.4 .2 .7 2.1 100.0% compared with 4.43 percent at December 31, 2004. The average maturity of the available-for-sale portfolio increased to 6.10 years at December 31, 2005, up from 4.45 years at December 31, 2004. The relative mix of the type of investment securities maintained in the portfolio is provided in Table 11. At December 31, 2005, the available-for-sale portfolio included a $662 million net unrealized loss, compared with a net unrealized loss of $271 million at December 31, 2004. Deposits Total deposits were $124.7 billion at December 31, 2005, compared with $120.7 billion at December 31, 2004, resulting from increases in time deposits greater than $100,000, time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 and noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by a decrease in money market savings accounts. Average total deposits in 2005 increased $4.8 billion (4.1 percent) from 2004, reﬂecting growth in average time deposits greater than $100,000 and interest checking accounts. The increases in these categories were offset somewhat by lower average money market savings account balances and lower noninterest-bearing deposits. Noninterest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2005, increased $1.5 billion (4.7 percent) from December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily attributable to increasing Table 12 D E P O S I T S The composition of deposits was as follows: deposits related to corporate business deposits, mortgage banking businesses and government banking deposits in the Wholesale Banking business line relative to a year ago. Corporate business deposits increased due to new customer relationships and business customers utilizing less of their deposit liquidity to fund business growth. Average noninterest-bearing deposits in 2005 decreased $.6 billion (2.0 percent), compared with 2004. Interest-bearing savings deposits decreased $2.6 billion (4.3 percent) at December 31, 2005, compared with December 31, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in money market savings accounts. The $2.5 billion (8.3 percent) decrease in money market savings account balances reﬂected the Company’s deposit pricing decisions in selected markets, given excess customer liquidity throughout 2004 and a migration of some customer balances to time deposits greater than $100,000 as rates increased on time deposit products. Average interest-bearing savings deposits in 2005 decreased $1.7 billion (2.9 percent), compared with 2004, primarily driven by a reduction in money market savings account balances of $3.5 billion (10.8 percent) offset by higher interest checking account balances of $1.9 billion (8.8 percent). December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Amount Percent of Total Noninterest-bearing deposits***************** $ 32,214 Interest-bearing deposits Interest checking************************ Money market savings******************* Savings accounts *********************** Total of savings deposits ************* Time certificates of deposit less than $100,000 *** Time deposits greater than $100,000 23,274 27,934 5,602 56,810 13,214 Domestic ****************************** Foreign ******************************** 14,341 8,130 Total interest-bearing deposits ********* 92,495 25.8% $ 30,756 25.5% $ 32,470 27.3% $ 35,106 30.4% $ 31,212 29.7% 18.7 22.4 4.5 45.6 10.6 11.5 6.5 74.2 23,186 30,478 5,728 59,392 12,544 11,956 6,093 19.2 25.2 4.8 49.2 10.4 9.9 5.0 21,404 34,025 5,630 61,059 13,690 5,902 5,931 18.0 28.6 4.7 51.3 11.5 4.9 5.0 17,467 27,753 5,021 50,241 17,973 9,427 2,787 15.1 24.0 4.4 43.5 15.5 8.2 2.4 15,251 24,835 4,637 44,723 20,724 7,286 1,274 14.5 23.6 4.4 42.5 19.7 6.9 1.2 89,985 74.5 86,582 72.7 80,428 69.6 74,007 70.3 Total deposits ************************** $124,709 100.0% $120,741 100.0% $119,052 100.0% $115,534 100.0% $105,219 100.0% The maturity of time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 and time deposits greater than $100,000 was as follows: Time Certiﬁcates of Deposit Less Than $100,000 Time Deposits Greater Than $100,000 December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Three months or less ************************************************** Three months through six months *************************************** Six months through one year ******************************************* 2007 **************************************************************** 2008 **************************************************************** 2009 **************************************************************** 2010 **************************************************************** Thereafter ************************************************************ Total ************************************************************* $ 2,560 2,705 3,478 2,914 801 535 212 9 $13,214 $17,115 2,234 1,509 983 254 230 133 13 Total $19,675 4,939 4,987 3,897 1,055 765 345 22 $22,471 $35,685 U.S. BANCORP 31 Interest-bearing time deposits at December 31, 2005, increased $5.1 billion (16.6 percent), compared with December 31, 2004. The increase was driven by increases of $4.4 billion (24.5 percent) and $.7 billion (5.3 percent) in time deposits greater than $100,000 and time certiﬁcates of deposits less than $100,000, respectively. Changes in these deposit categories were principally due to pricing decisions based on the relative cost of funding. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 increased $7.0 billion (51.0 percent) and average time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000 increased $125 million (1.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. Time deposits greater than $100,000 are largely viewed as purchased funds and are managed to levels deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources. Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to fund growth of earning assets in excess of deposit growth. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings, were $20.2 billion at December 31, 2005, compared with $13.1 billion at December 31, 2004. Short-term funding is managed, within approved liquidity policies, to levels deemed appropriate given alternative funding sources. The increase of $7.1 billion in short-term borrowings reﬂected wholesale funding associated with the Company’s earning asset growth and asset/liability management activities. Long-term debt was $37.1 billion at December 31, 2005, compared with $34.7 billion at December 31, 2004, reﬂecting the issuances of $5.5 billion of bank notes, $4.5 billion of convertible senior debentures, $.5 billion of medium-term notes, $.9 billion of subordinated debt, $1.0 billion of junior subordinated debentures and the addition of $3.1 billion of Federal Home Loan Bank (‘‘FHLB’’) advances, offset by long-term debt maturities, repayments and the impact of the tender offer completed during 2005. Refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding long-term debt and the ‘‘Liquidity Risk Management’’ section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company. C O R P O R AT E R I S K P R O F I L E Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a ﬁnancial services company. The most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Residual risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets or the residual cash ﬂows related to asset securitization and other off-balance sheet structures. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, legal and compliance risk, processing 32 U.S. BANCORP errors, technology, breaches of internal controls and business continuation and disaster recovery risk. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Rate movements can affect the repricing of assets and liabilities differently, as well as their market value. Market risk arises from ﬂuctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in changes in the values of ﬁnancial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. In addition, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Company’s stock value, customer base or revenue. Credit Risk Management The Company’s strategy for credit risk management includes well-deﬁned, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. The strategy also emphasizes diversiﬁcation on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and management reviews of loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality. The credit risk management strategy also includes a credit risk assessment process, independent of business line managers, that performs assessments of compliance with commercial and consumer credit policies, risk ratings, and other critical credit information. The Company strives to identify potential problem loans early, take any necessary charge- offs promptly and maintain adequate reserve levels for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio. Commercial banking operations rely on prudent credit policies and procedures and individual lender and business line manager accountability. Lenders are assigned lending authority based on their level of experience and customer service requirements. Credit ofﬁcers reporting to an independent credit administration function have higher levels of lending authority and support the business units in their credit decision process. Loan decisions are documented as to the borrower’s business, purpose of the loan, evaluation of the repayment source and the associated risks, evaluation of collateral, covenants and monitoring requirements, and risk rating rationale. The Company utilizes a credit risk rating system to measure the credit quality of individual commercial loan transactions. The Company uses the risk rating system for regulatory reporting, determining the frequency of review of the credit exposures, and evaluation and determination of the speciﬁc allowance for commercial credit losses. The Company regularly forecasts potential changes in risk ratings, nonperforming status and potential for loss and the estimated impact on the allowance for credit losses. In the Company’s retail banking operations, standard credit scoring systems are used to assess credit risks of consumer, small business and small-ticket leasing customers and to price consumer products accordingly. The Company conducts the underwriting and collections of its retail products in loan underwriting and servicing centers specializing in certain retail products. Forecasts of delinquency levels, bankruptcies and losses in conjunction with projection of estimated losses by delinquency categories and vintage information are regularly prepared and are used to evaluate underwriting and collection and determine the speciﬁc allowance for credit losses for these products. Because business processes and credit risks associated with unfunded credit commitments are essentially the same as for loans, the Company utilizes similar processes to estimate its liability for unfunded credit commitments. The Company also engages in non-lending activities that may give rise to credit risk, including interest rate swap and option contracts for balance sheet hedging purposes, foreign exchange transactions, deposit overdrafts and interest rate swap contracts for customers, and settlement risk, including Automated Clearing House transactions, and the processing of credit card transactions for merchants. These activities are also subject to credit review, analysis and approval processes. Economic and Other Factors In evaluating its credit risk, the Company considers changes, if any, in underwriting activities, the loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-speciﬁc concentrations), trends in loan performance, the level of allowance coverage relative to similar banking institutions and macroeconomic factors. Since mid-2003, economic conditions have steadily improved as evidenced by stronger earnings across many corporate sectors, higher equity valuations, and stronger retail sales and consumer spending. In late 2003, unemployment rates stabilized and began to decline from a high of 6.13 percent in the third quarter of that year. However, the banking industry continued to have elevated levels of nonperforming assets and net charge-offs in 2003 compared with the late 1990’s. Conditions within certain industries, including manufacturing and airline transportation sectors, lagged behind the growth in the broader economy especially in some markets served by the Company. During 2004, unemployment rates and bankruptcy levels continued to improve. The trends related to consumer spending for retail goods and services expanded throughout the year. While corporate proﬁts were strong, the index of corporate proﬁts retreated somewhat in the second quarter of 2004. As a result, equity markets stalled in the second and third quarters of 2004 due to uncertainty related to corporate proﬁts and world events. Within the Company’s customer base, commercial loan demand continued to be somewhat soft through mid-2004. In the fourth quarter of 2004, most economic indicators again began to expand and commercial loan balances for the Company displayed year- over-year quarterly growth for the ﬁrst time since mid- 2001. Economic conditions continued to improve in 2005, as reﬂected in strong expansion of the gross domestic product index, lower unemployment rates, favorable trends related to corporate proﬁts and consumer spending for retail goods and services. The Federal Reserve Bank pursued a measured approach to increasing short-term rates in an effort to prevent an acceleration of inﬂation and maintain the current rate of economic growth. In addition to economic factors, changes in regulations and legislation can have an impact on the credit performance of the loan portfolios. During 2005, the Company began implementing higher minimum balance payment requirements for its credit card customers in response to industry guidance issued by the banking regulatory agencies. This industry guidance was provided to minimize the likelihood that minimum balance payments would not be sufﬁcient to cover interest, fees and a portion of the principal balance of a credit card loan resulting in negative amortization, or increasing account balances. Also, new bankruptcy legislation was enacted in October 2005, making it more difﬁcult for borrowers to have their debts forgiven during bankruptcy proceedings. While these changes may have a long term beneﬁt, the lending industry may experience increasing levels of nonperforming loans, restructured loans and delinquencies over the short-term related to consumer credit. Credit Diversiﬁcation The Company manages its credit risk, in part, through diversification of its loan portfolio. As part of its normal business activities, it offers a broad array of traditional commercial lending products and specialized products such as asset-based lending, commercial lease financing, agricultural credit, warehouse mortgage lending, commercial real estate, health care and correspondent banking. The Company also offers an array of retail lending products including credit cards, retail leases, home equity, revolving credit, lending to students and other consumer loans. These retail credit products are primarily offered through the branch office network, home mortgage and loan production offices, indirect distribution channels, such as automobile dealers and a consumer finance division. The Company monitors and manages the portfolio diversification by industry, customer and geography. Table 6 provides information with respect to the overall product diversification and changes in the mix during 2005. The commercial portfolio reﬂects the Company’s focus on serving small business customers, middle market and U.S. BANCORP 33 larger corporate businesses throughout its 24-state banking region and large national customers within certain niche industry groups. Table 7 provides a summary of the signiﬁcant industry groups and geographic locations of commercial loans outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004. The commercial loan portfolio is diversiﬁed among various industries with somewhat higher concentrations in consumer products and services, ﬁnancial services, commercial services and supplies, capital goods (including manufacturing and commercial construction-related businesses), property management and development and agricultural industries. Additionally, the commercial portfolio is diversiﬁed across the Company’s geographical markets with 81.4 percent of total commercial loans within the 24-state banking region. Credit relationships outside of the Company’s banking region are reﬂected within the corporate banking, mortgage banking, auto dealer and leasing businesses focusing on large national customers and speciﬁcally targeted industries. Loans to mortgage banking customers are primarily warehouse lines which are collateralized with the underlying mortgages. The Company regularly monitors its mortgage collateral position to manage its risk exposure. The commercial real estate portfolio reﬂects the Company’s focus on serving business owners within its footprint as well as regional and national investment-based real estate. At December 31, 2005, the Company had commercial real estate loans of $28.5 billion, or 20.7 percent of total loans, compared with $27.6 billion at December 31, 2004. Within commercial real estate loans, different property types have varying degrees of credit risk. Table 8 provides a summary of the signiﬁcant property types and geographic locations of commercial real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004. At December 31, 2005, approximately 32.4 percent of the commercial real estate loan portfolio represented business owner-occupied properties that tend to exhibit credit risk characteristics similar to the middle market commercial loan portfolio. Generally, the investment-based real estate mortgages are diversiﬁed among various property types with somewhat higher concentrations in multi-family, ofﬁce and retail properties. While investment-based commercial real estate continues to perform with relatively strong occupancy levels and cash ﬂows, these categories of loans can be adversely impacted during a rising rate environment. Included in commercial real estate at year end 2005 was approximately $.5 billion in loans related to land held for development and $1.9 billion of loans related to residential and commercial acquisition and development properties. These loans are subject to quarterly monitoring for changes in local market conditions due to a higher credit risk proﬁle. Acquisition and development loans continued to perform well with strong market conditions; however, these 34 U.S. BANCORP loans can be adversely impacted by a slow down in the housing market and softening of demand. The commercial real estate portfolio is diversiﬁed across the Company’s geographical markets with 92.0 percent of total commercial real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2005, within the 24-state banking region. Residential mortgages are originated through the Company’s branches, loan production ofﬁces, a wholesale network of originators and a consumer ﬁnance company. Within the residential mortgage portfolio approximately 71 percent had a loan-to-value of 80 percent or less at the date of origination (39 percent of the consumer ﬁnance company portfolio and 86 percent of the traditional mortgage portfolio). Interest-only mortgages at December 31, 2005 represent 18 percent of the residential mortgage portfolio (20 percent of the consumer ﬁnance company portfolio and 17 percent of the traditional mortgage portfolio). The Company does not have any residential mortgages whose payment schedule would cause balances to increase over time. The retail loan portfolio principally reﬂects the Company’s focus on consumers within its footprint of branches and certain niche lending activities that are nationally focused. Within the Company’s retail loan portfolio approximately 83.1 percent of the credit card balances relate to bank branch, co-branded and afﬁnity programs that generally experience better credit quality performance than portfolios generated through national direct mail programs. At December 31, 2005, approximately 84.7 percent of the student loan portfolio is federally guaranteed through various programs reducing its risk proﬁle. Table 9 provides a geographical summary of the residential mortgage and retail loan portfolios. Loan Delinquencies Trends in delinquency ratios represent an indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the Company’s loan portfolios. The entire balance of an account is considered delinquent if the minimum payment contractually required to be made is not received by the speciﬁed date on the billing statement. The Company measures delinquencies, both including and excluding nonperforming loans, to enable comparability with other companies. Advances made pursuant to servicing agreements to Government National Mortgage Association (‘‘GNMA’’) mortgage pools whose repayments of principal and interest are substantially insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs are excluded from delinquency statistics. In addition, under certain situations, a retail customer’s account may be re-aged to remove it from delinquent status. Generally, the intent of a re-aged account is to assist customers who have recently overcome temporary ﬁnancial difﬁculties, and have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to resume regular payments. To qualify for re- Table 13 D E L I N Q U E N T L O A N R AT I O S A S A P E R C E N T O F E N D I N G L O A N B A L A N C E S At December 31, 90 days or more past due excluding nonperforming loans Commercial 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Commercial ************************************************* Lease ﬁnancing ********************************************** .06% — Total commercial ****************************************** .05 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *************************************** Construction and development ********************************* Total commercial real estate ******************************** — — — Residential mortgages*************************************** .32 Retail Credit card ************************************************** Retail leasing ************************************************ Other retail ************************************************** Total retail ************************************************ 1.26 .04 .22 .36 .05% .02 .05 — — — .46 1.74 .08 .29 .47 .06% .04 .06 .02 .03 .02 .61 1.68 .14 .41 .56 .14% .10 .14 .03 .07 .04 .90 2.09 .19 .54 .72 .14% .45 .18 .03 .02 .02 .78 2.18 .11 .74 .90 Total loans ******************************************** .18% .23% .28% .37% .40% At December 31, 90 days or more past due including nonperforming loans Commercial***************************************************** Commercial real estate ******************************************* Residential mortgages (a) ***************************************** Retail ********************************************************** Total loans ************************************************** 2005 .69% .55 .55 .50 .58% 2004 .99% .73 .74 .51 .74% 2003 1.97% .82 .91 .62 1.14% 2002 2.35% .90 1.44 .79 1.43% 2001 1.71% .68 1.79 1.03 1.28% (a) Delinquent loan ratios exclude advances made pursuant to servicing agreements to Government National Mortgage Association (‘‘GNMA’’) mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the Federal Housing Administration or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Including the guaranteed amounts, the ratio of residential mortgages 90 days or more past due was 4.35 percent, 5.19 percent, and 6.07 percent at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Information prior to 2003 is not available. aging, the account must have been open for at least one year and cannot have been re-aged during the preceding 365 days. An account may not be re-aged more than two times in a ﬁve year period. To qualify for re-aging, the customer must also have made three regular minimum monthly payments within the last 90 days. In addition, the Company may re-age the retail account of a customer who has experienced longer-term ﬁnancial difﬁculties and apply modiﬁed, concessionary terms and conditions to the account. Such additional re-ages are limited to one in a ﬁve year period, must meet the qualiﬁcations for re-aging described above, except that the customer’s three consecutive minimum monthly payments may be based on the modiﬁed terms and conditions applied to the account, and continue to be reported in restructured loans. All re- aging strategies must be independently approved by the Company’s credit administration function and are limited to credit card and other retail accounts. Commercial loans are not subject to re-aging policies. Accruing loans 90 days or more past due totaled $253 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $294 million at December 31, 2004, and $329 million at December 31, 2003. These loans were not included in nonperforming assets and continue to accrue interest because they are adequately secured by collateral, and/or are in the process of collection and are reasonably expected to result in repayment or restoration to current status. The ratio of 90 day delinquent loans to total loans was .18 percent at December 31, 2005, compared with .23 percent at December 31, 2004. To monitor credit risk associated with retail loans, the Company also monitors delinquency ratios in the various stages of collection. In general, delinquency ratios for retail loans continued to improve relative to December 31, 2004, reflecting the Company’s ongoing improvement in collection efforts, underwriting, risk management and stable economic conditions. U.S. BANCORP 35 The following table provides summary delinquency information for residential mortgages and retail loans: December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Residential mortgages 30-89 days*********** 90 days or more ****** Nonperforming ******** Total ************ Retail Credit card 30-89 days*********** 90 days or more ****** Nonperforming ******** Total ************ Retail leasing 30-89 days*********** 90 days or more ****** Nonperforming ******** Total ************ Other retail 30-89 days*********** 90 days or more ****** Nonperforming ******** Total ************ Amount As a Percent of Ending Loan Balances 2005 2004 2005 2004 $112 67 48 $227 $147 90 49 $286 $ 43 3 — $ 46 $206 70 17 $293 $108 70 43 $221 $142 115 — $257 $ 59 6 — $ 65 $224 84 17 $325 .55% .32 .23 .70% .46 .28 1.10% 1.44% 2.06% 1.26 .69 2.15% 1.74 — 4.01% 3.89% .59% .04 — .63% .66% .22 .06 .83% .08 — .91% .76% .29 .05 .94% 1.10% Nonperforming Assets The level of nonperforming assets represents another indicator of the potential for future credit losses. The Company’s continued focus on improving the credit process and improving economic conditions since mid-2003 were the primary factors in reducing the overall credit risk proﬁle during the past several years. Recent changes in regulation and bankruptcy laws may effect delinquency levels in the short-term. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modiﬁed terms, other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. Interest payments collected from assets on nonaccrual status are typically applied against the principal balance and not recorded as income. At December 31, 2005, total nonperforming assets were $644 million, compared with $748 million at year-end 2004 and $1,148 million at year-end 2003. The ratio of total nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate decreased to .47 percent at December 31, 2005, compared with .59 percent and .97 percent at the end of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The $104 million decrease in total nonperforming assets in 2005 principally reﬂected decreases in nonperforming commercial and commercial real estate loans, partially offset by increases in nonperforming retail loans and residential mortgages. The decrease in nonperforming commercial loans in 2005 was broad-based across most industry sectors within the commercial loan portfolio including capital goods, consumer-related sectors, manufacturing and certain segments of transportation. The transportation industry, particularly the airline industry, continues to be economically stressed and has had difﬁculty improving cash ﬂows from operations. While airline travel continues to improve, the recovery of the industry has been prolonged due to intense competition from low-cost providers, the nature of their cost structure and rising fuel prices. The reduction in nonperforming commercial real estate loans during 2005, was broad-based and extended across most property types. Nonperforming retail loans increased by $49 million from a year ago, primarily due to implementing a program for customers having ﬁnancial difﬁculties meeting recent minimum balance payment requirements. Retail customers that meet certain criteria may have the terms of their credit card and other loan agreements modiﬁed to allow amortization of their balances over a period of up to 60 months. The Company has considered these loans in the determination of the allowance for credit losses. 36 U.S. BANCORP Table 14 N O N P E R F O R M I N G A S S E T S ( a ) At December 31, (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Commercial Commercial ************************************************* Lease ﬁnancing********************************************** Total commercial ***************************************** $231 42 273 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *************************************** Construction and development ******************************** Total commercial real estate******************************** Residential mortgages ************************************** Retail Credit card ************************************************* Retail leasing************************************************ Other retail************************************************** Total retail *********************************************** Total nonperforming loans ****************************** Other real estate ******************************************** Other assets************************************************* Total nonperforming assets ***************************** Accruing loans 90 days or more past due ************************** Nonperforming loans to total loans ******************************** Nonperforming assets to total loans plus other real estate ************ Net interest lost on nonperforming loans *************************** 134 23 157 48 49 — 17 66 544 71 29 $644 $253 .39% .47% $ 30 $289 91 380 175 25 200 43 — — 17 17 640 72 36 $748 $294 .51% .59% $ 42 $ 624 113 737 $ 760 167 927 $ 526 181 707 178 40 218 40 — — 25 25 175 57 232 52 — 1 25 26 131 36 167 79 — 7 41 48 1,020 1,237 1,001 73 55 $1,148 $ 329 .86% .97% 67 $ 59 77 $1,373 $ 426 1.06% 1.18% 65 $ 44 75 $1,120 $ 463 .87% .98% 63 $ Changes in Nonperforming Assets (Dollars in Millions) Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Retail and Residential Mortgages (c) Total Balance December 31, 2004 ************************************ $ 619 $129 $ 748 Additions to nonperforming assets New nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties ****************** Advances on loans******************************************** Total additions ******************************************** Reductions in nonperforming assets Paydowns, payoffs******************************************** Net sales **************************************************** Return to performing status ************************************ Charge-offs (b) *********************************************** Total reductions ******************************************* Net additions (reductions) in nonperforming assets ********** 397 35 432 (265) (78) (66) (185) (594) (162) 101 — 101 (29) — (11) (3) (43) 58 498 35 533 (294) (78) (77) (188) (637) (104) Balance December 31, 2005 ************************************ $ 457 $187 $ 644 (a) Throughout this document, nonperforming assets and related ratios do not include accruing loans 90 days or more past due. (b) Charge-offs exclude actions for certain card products and loan sales that were not classiﬁed as nonperforming at the time the charge-off occurred. (c) Residential mortgage information excludes changes related to residential mortgages serviced by others. Residential mortgage loans on nonaccrual status increased slightly during 2005 primarily reﬂecting growth in the portfolio. As a percentage of loan balances, nonperforming residential mortgages declined to .23 percent at December 31, 2005 compared with .28 percent at December 31, 2004. The $400 million decrease in total nonperforming assets in 2004, as compared with 2003, reﬂected decreases in nonperforming commercial, commercial real estate and retail loans, partially offset by an increase in nonperforming residential mortgages. The decrease in nonperforming assets in 2004 was also broad-based across most industry sectors within the commercial loan portfolio including capital goods, consumer-related sectors, manufacturing and certain segments of transportation. Included in nonperforming loans were restructured commercial, commercial real estate and retail loans of $75 million and $58 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Commitments to lend additional funds under restructured loans were $9 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $12 million as of December 31, 2004. Restructured loans performing under the restructured terms beyond a speciﬁed timeframe are reported as ‘‘restructured loans’’ and accrue interest. Restructured Loans Accruing Interest On a case-by-case basis, management determines whether an account that experiences ﬁnancial difﬁculties should be modiﬁed as to its U.S. BANCORP 37 interest rate or repayment terms to maximize the Company’s collection of its balance. Loans restructured at a rate equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the contract is modiﬁed are excluded from restructured loans once repayment performance, in accordance with the modiﬁed agreement, has been demonstrated over several payment cycles. Loans that have interest rates reduced below comparable market rates remain classiﬁed as restructured loans; however, interest income is accrued at the reduced rate as long as the customer complies with the revised terms and conditions. The following table provides a summary of restructured loans that continue to accrue interest: December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Amount As a Percent of Ending Loan Balances 2005 2004 2005 2004 Commercial ***************** Residential mortgages ******** Credit card ***************** Other retail****************** $ 6 59 218 32 Total******************* $315 $ 14 44 138 31 $227 .01% .28 3.05 .08 .03% .29 2.09 .08 .23% .18% Analysis of Loan Net Charge-Offs Total loan net charge-offs were $685 million in 2005, compared with $767 million in 2004 and $1,252 million in 2003. The ratio of total loan net charge-offs to average loans was .51 percent in 2005, compared with .63 percent in 2004 and 1.06 percent in 2003. The overall level of net charge-offs in 2005 and 2004 reﬂected improving economic conditions and the Company’s efforts to reduce the overall risk proﬁle of the portfolio through ongoing improvement in collection efforts underwriting and risk management. These factors have resulted in improving credit quality, lower gross charge-offs and high levels of commercial loan recoveries. Commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs for 2005 were $90 million (.13 percent of average loans outstanding), compared with $196 million (.29 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2004 and $609 million (.89 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2003. The year-over-year improvement in net charge-offs was broad-based across most industries within the commercial loan portfolio. The Company anticipates commercial loan recoveries will decline somewhat over the next several quarters causing commercial loan net charge- offs to stabilize or slightly increase in 2006. The decrease in commercial and commercial real estate loan net charge-offs in 2004, when compared with 2003, was broad-based and extended across most industries within the commercial loan portfolio and reﬂected higher levels of commercial loan recoveries principally within the Wholesale Banking line of business. Retail loan net charge-offs in 2005 were $559 million (1.26 percent of average loans outstanding), compared with $542 million (1.32 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2004 and $616 million (1.61 percent of average loans outstanding) in 2003. Higher levels of retail loan net charge- offs in 2005, compared with 2004, reflected approximately $56 million of charge-offs related to the new bankruptcy legislation. The Company anticipates that the higher level of Table 15 N E T C H A R G E - O F F S A S A P E R C E N T O F AV E R A G E L O A N S O U T S TA N D I N G Year Ended December 31 Commercial 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Commercial ************************************************* Lease ﬁnancing ********************************************** .12% .85 Total commercial ****************************************** .20 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *************************************** Construction and development ********************************* Total commercial real estate ******************************** Residential mortgages*************************************** Retail Credit card ************************************************** Retail leasing ************************************************ Home equity and second mortgages**************************** Other retail ************************************************** Total retail ************************************************ .03 (.04) .01 .20 4.20 .35 .46 1.20 1.26 .29% 1.42 .43 .09 .13 .10 .20 4.14 .59 .54 1.21 1.32 1.34% 1.65 1.38 .14 .16 .14 .23 4.62 .86 .70 1.60 1.61 1.29% 2.67 1.46 .17 .11 .15 .23 4.97 .72 .73 2.11 1.85 1.62% 1.95 1.66 .22 .17 .20 .15 4.80 .64 .85 2.16 1.94 Total loans (a) ***************************************** .51% .63% 1.06% 1.20% 1.31% (a) In accordance with guidance provided in the Interagency Guidance on Certain Loans Held for Sale, loans held with the intent to sell are transferred to the Loans Held for Sale category based on the lower of cost or fair value. At the time of transfer, the portion of the mark-to-market losses representing probable credit losses determined in accordance with policies and methods utilized to determine the allowance for credit losses is included in net charge-offs. The remaining portion of the losses was reported separately as a reduction of the allowance for credit losses under ‘‘Losses from loan sales/transfers.’’ Had the entire amount of the loss been reported as charge-offs, total net charge-offs would have been $1,876 million (1.59 percent of average loans) for the year ended December 31, 2001. 38 U.S. BANCORP bankruptcy filings that occurred in late 2005 will result in lower bankruptcy filings through the first half of 2006 before returning to more normalized levels. Lower levels of retail loan net charge-offs in 2004, compared with 2003, principally reflected changes by the Company in underwriting, ongoing collection efforts and other risk management activities. The decline also reflected lower delinquency ratios from 2003 as the economy continued to improve. The Company’s retail lending business utilizes several distinct business processes and channels to originate retail credit including traditional branch credit, indirect lending and a consumer ﬁnance division. Each distinct underwriting and origination activity manages unique credit risk characteristics and prices its loan production commensurate with the differing risk proﬁles. Within Consumer Banking, U.S. Bank Consumer Finance (‘‘USBCF’’) participates in all facets of the Company’s consumer lending activities. USBCF specializes in serving channel-speciﬁc and alternative lending markets in residential mortgages, home equity and installment loan ﬁnancing. USBCF manages loans originated through a broker network, correspondent relationships and U.S. Bank branch ofﬁces. Generally, loans managed by the Company’s consumer ﬁnance division exhibit higher credit risk characteristics, but are priced commensurate with the differing risk proﬁle. The following table provides an analysis of net charge- offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding managed by the consumer ﬁnance division, compared with traditional branch related loans: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Consumer Finance (a) Residential mortgages ***** Home equity and second mortgages ************ Other retail *************** Traditional Branch Residential mortgages ***** Home equity and second mortgages ************ Other retail *************** Total Company Residential mortgages ***** Home equity and second mortgages ************ Other retail *************** Average Loan Amount Percent of Average Loans 2005 2004 2005 2004 $ 5,947 $ 4,531 .52% .44% 2,431 393 2,412 414 1.81 5.09 2.07 5.07 $12,089 $ 9,791 .04% .09% 12,514 15,165 11,628 14,007 .19 1.10 .22 1.10 $18,036 $14,322 .20% .20% 14,945 15,558 14,040 14,421 .46 1.20 .54 1.21 (a) Consumer ﬁnance category included credit originated and managed by USBCF, as well as home equity and second mortgages with a loan-to-value greater than 100 percent that were originated in the branches. U.S. BANCORP 39 Table 16 S U M M A RY O F A L L O WA N C E F O R C R E D I T L O S S E S (Dollars in Millions) Balance at beginning of year************************************ 2005 $2,269 2004 $2,369 2003 $2,422 2002 $2,457 2001 $1,787 Charge-offs Commercial Commercial ******************************************** Lease ﬁnancing***************************************** Total commercial ************************************ Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages ********************************** Construction and development *************************** Total commercial real estate*************************** Residential mortgages ************************************** Retail Credit card********************************************* Retail leasing ******************************************* Home equity and second mortgages ********************** Other retail********************************************* Total retail ****************************************** Total charge-offs ********************************* Recoveries Commercial Commercial ******************************************** Lease ﬁnancing***************************************** Total commercial ************************************ Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages ********************************** Construction and development *************************** Total commercial real estate*************************** Residential mortgages ************************************** Retail Credit card********************************************* Retail leasing ******************************************* Home equity and second mortgages ********************** Other retail********************************************* Total retail ****************************************** Total recoveries ********************************** Net Charge-offs Commercial Commercial ******************************************** Lease ﬁnancing***************************************** Total commercial ************************************ Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages ********************************** Construction and development *************************** Total commercial real estate*************************** Residential mortgages ************************************** Retail Credit card********************************************* Retail leasing ******************************************* Home equity and second mortgages ********************** Other retail********************************************* Total retail ****************************************** Total net charge-offs ****************************** Provision for credit losses ************************************** Losses from loan sales /transfers (a)****************************** Acquisitions and other changes ********************************* Balance at end of year ***************************************** 140 76 216 16 3 19 39 313 38 83 241 675 949 95 34 129 10 6 16 3 35 12 15 54 116 264 45 42 87 6 (3) 3 36 278 26 68 187 559 685 666 — 1 244 110 354 29 13 42 33 282 49 89 225 645 556 139 695 44 13 57 30 282 57 105 268 712 559 189 748 41 9 50 23 305 45 108 312 770 779 144 923 50 13 63 16 294 34 113 329 770 1,074 1,494 1,591 1,772 144 41 185 11 4 15 4 30 10 13 50 103 307 100 69 169 18 9 27 29 252 39 76 175 542 767 669 — (2) 70 55 125 16 2 18 3 27 7 12 50 96 242 486 84 570 28 11 39 27 255 50 93 218 616 1,252 1,254 — (55) $2,369 $2,184 185 $2,369 2.00% 232 206 189 67 40 107 9 2 11 4 25 6 11 54 96 218 492 149 641 32 7 39 19 280 39 97 258 674 61 30 91 9 1 10 3 23 5 13 80 121 225 718 114 832 41 12 53 13 271 29 100 249 649 1,373 1,349 — (11) $2,422 1,547 2,529 (329) 17 $2,457 2.08% 196 176 176 2.15% 245 219 159 $2,251 $2,269 Components Allowance for loan losses *********************************** Liability for unfunded credit commitments ********************* Total allowance for credit losses *********************** Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of Period-end loans******************************************* Nonperforming loans *************************************** Nonperforming assets ************************************** Net charge-offs (a) ***************************************** $2,041 210 $2,251 1.63% 414 350 329 $2,080 189 $2,269 1.80% 355 303 296 (a) In accordance with guidance provided in the Interagency Guidance on Certain Loans Held for Sale, loans held with the intent to sell are transferred to the Loans Held for Sale category based on the lower of cost or fair value. At the time of the transfer, the portion of the mark-to-market losses representing probable credit losses determined in accordance with policies and methods utilized to determine the allowance for credit losses is included in net charge-offs. The remaining portion of the losses was reported separately as a reduction of the allowance for credit losses under ‘‘Losses from loan sales/transfers.’’ Had the entire amount of the loss been reported as charge-offs, total net charge-offs would have been $1,876 million for the year ended 2001. Additionally, the allowance as a percent of net charge-offs would have been 131 percent for the year ended December 31, 2001. 40 U.S. BANCORP Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit The allowance recorded for commercial and Losses The allowance for loan losses provides coverage for probable and estimable losses inherent in the Company’s loan and lease portfolio. Management evaluates the allowance each quarter to determine that it is adequate to cover these inherent losses. The evaluation of each element and the overall allowance is based on a continuing assessment of problem loans, recent loss experience and other factors, including regulatory guidance and economic conditions. Because business processes and credit risks associated with unfunded credit commitments are essentially the same as for loans, the Company utilizes similar processes to estimate its liability for unfunded credit commitments, which is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Both the allowance for loan losses and the liability for unfunded credit commitments are included in the Company’s analysis of credit losses. At December 31, 2005, the allowance for credit losses was $2,251 million (1.63 percent of loans). This compares with an allowance of $2,269 million (1.80 percent of loans) at December 31, 2004, and $2,369 million (2.00 percent of loans) at December 31, 2003. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 414 percent at year-end 2005, compared with 355 percent at year-end 2004 and 232 percent at year-end 2003. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to loan net charge-offs was 329 percent at year-end 2005, compared with 296 percent at year-end 2004 and 189 percent at year-end 2003. Management determined that the allowance for credit losses was adequate at December 31, 2005. Several factors were taken into consideration in evaluating the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2005, including the risk proﬁle of the portfolios and loan net charge-offs during the period, the level of nonperforming assets, accruing loans 90 days or more past due and delinquency ratios compared with December 31, 2004. Management also considered the uncertainty related to certain industry sectors, including the airline industry, and the extent of credit exposure to other borrowers within the portfolio. In addition, concentration risks associated with commercial real estate and the mix of loans, including credit cards, loans originated through the consumer ﬁnance division and residential mortgages balances, and their relative credit risks were evaluated. Finally, the Company considered current economic conditions that might impact the portfolio. Management determines the allowance that is required for speciﬁc loan categories based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its methods for determining the allowance for each element of the portfolio and makes enhancements considered appropriate. Table 17 shows the amount of the allowance for credit losses by portfolio category. commercial real estate loans is based on a regular review of individual credit relationships. The Company’s risk rating process is an integral component of the methodology utilized to determine these elements of the allowance for credit losses. An allowance for credit losses is established for pools of commercial and commercial real estate loans and unfunded commitments based on the risk ratings assigned. An analysis of the migration of commercial and commercial real estate loans and actual loss experience throughout the business cycle is also conducted quarterly to assess the exposure for credits with similar risk characteristics. In addition to its risk rating process, the Company separately analyzes the carrying value of impaired loans to determine whether the carrying value is less than or equal to the appraised collateral value or the present value of expected cash ﬂows. Based on this analysis, an allowance for credit losses may be speciﬁcally established for impaired loans. The allowance established for commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios, including impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans, was $929 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $941 million and $1,015 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decline in the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans of $12 million at December 31, 2005, compared with December 31, 2004, reﬂected a $21 million reduction related to changes in loss severity rates, offset somewhat by the impact of growth in the portfolios and a $9 million increase related to changes in risk classiﬁcations. The allowance recorded for the residential mortgages and retail loan portfolios is based on an analysis of product mix, credit scoring and risk composition of the portfolio, loss and bankruptcy experiences, economic conditions and historical and expected delinquency and charge-off statistics for each homogenous group of loans. Based on this information and analysis, an allowance was established approximating a rolling twelve-month estimate of net charge-offs. The allowance established for residential mortgages was $39 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $33 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in the allowance for the residential mortgage portfolio year-over-year was primarily due to growth of the portfolio during 2005. The allowance established for retail loans was $558 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $610 million and $651 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decline in the allowance for the retail portfolio in 2005 reﬂected improved credit quality favorably impacting inherent loss ratios and declining delinquency trends, partially offset by the impact of portfolio growth. U.S. BANCORP 41 Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of customer performance, portfolio trends or risk management processes, certain inherent but undetected losses are probable within the loan portfolios. This is due to several factors, including inherent delays in obtaining information regarding a customer’s ﬁnancial condition or changes in their unique business conditions, the judgmental nature of individual loan evaluations, collateral assessments and the interpretation of economic trends. Volatility of economic or customer-speciﬁc conditions affecting the identiﬁcation and estimation of losses from larger non-homogeneous credits and the sensitivity of assumptions utilized to establish allowances for homogeneous groups of loans, loan portfolio concentrations, and other subjective considerations are among other factors. Because of these subjective factors, the process utilized to determine each element of the allowance for credit losses by speciﬁc loan category has some imprecision. As such, the Company estimates a range of inherent losses in the portfolio based on statistical analyses and management judgment, and maintains an ‘‘allowance available for other factors’’ that is related to but not allocated to a speciﬁc loan category. A statistical analysis attempts to measure the extent of imprecision by determining the volatility of losses over time across loan categories. Also, management judgmentally considers loan concentrations, risks associated with speciﬁc industries, the stage of the business cycle, economic conditions and other qualitative factors. Based on this process, the amount of the allowance available for other factors was $725 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $685 million at December 31, 2004, and $670 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2005, approximately $592 million was related to estimated imprecision as described above. Of this amount, commercial and commercial real estate represented approximately 68 percent while residential and retail loans represented approximately 32 percent. The remaining allowance available for other factors of $133 million was related to concentration risk, including risks associated with the sluggish airline industry, relative size of the consumer ﬁnance and commercial real estate portfolios, highly leveraged enterprise-value credits, uncertainty regarding credit card losses during the transition to higher minimum balance payments and other qualitative factors. Given the many subjective factors affecting the credit portfolio, changes in the allowance for other factors may not directly coincide with changes in the risk ratings or the credit portfolio. Although the Company determines the amount of each element of the allowance separately and this process is an important credit management tool, the entire allowance for credit losses is available for the entire loan portfolio. The actual amount of losses incurred can vary signiﬁcantly from the estimated amounts. Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for accounting policies related to the allowance for credit losses. Residual Risk Management The Company manages its risk to changes in the residual value of leased assets through disciplined residual valuation setting at the inception of a Table 17 E L E M E N T S O F T H E A L L O WA N C E F O R C R E D I T L O S S E S December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 Allowance Amount Allowance as a Percent of Loans Commercial Commercial ********************* Lease ﬁnancing ****************** $ 656 105 $ 664 106 $ 696 90 $ 776 108 $1,068 108 1.73% 2.06 1.89% 2.14 2.08% 1.80 2.12% 2.01 2.64% 1.84 Total commercial************** 761 770 786 884 1,176 1.77 1.92 2.04 2.11 2.54 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *********** Construction and development***** Total commercial real estate **** Residential mortgages*********** Retail Credit card ********************** Retail leasing ******************** Home equity and second mortgages ******************* Other retail ********************** Total retail******************** Total allocated allowance******* Available for other factors ****** 115 53 168 39 284 24 62 188 558 131 40 171 33 283 44 88 195 610 170 59 229 33 268 47 101 235 651 153 53 206 34 272 44 115 269 700 177 76 253 22 295 39 88 283 705 1,526 725 1,584 685 1,699 670 1,824 598 2,156 301 .57 .65 .59 .19 3.98 .33 .41 1.16 1.22 1.11 .52 .64 .55 .62 .21 4.29 .61 .59 1.34 1.41 1.26 .54 .82 .89 .84 .25 4.52 .78 .76 1.70 1.67 1.43 .57 .75 .81 .77 .35 4.80 .77 .85 2.11 1.86 1.57 .51 .94 1.15 1.00 .28 5.01 .79 .72 2.39 2.02 1.89 .26 Total allowance ********************* $2,251 $2,269 $2,369 $2,422 $2,457 1.63% 1.80% 2.00% 2.08% 2.15% 42 U.S. BANCORP lease, diversiﬁcation of its leased assets, regular residual asset valuation reviews and monitoring of residual value gains or losses upon the disposition of assets. Commercial lease originations are subject to the same well-deﬁned underwriting standards referred to in the ‘‘Credit Risk Management’’ section which includes an evaluation of the residual risk. Retail lease residual risk is mitigated further by originating longer-term vehicle leases and effective end- of-term marketing of off-lease vehicles. Also, to reduce the ﬁnancial risk of potential changes in vehicle residual values, the Company maintains residual value insurance. The catastrophic insurance maintained by the Company provides for the potential recovery of losses on individual vehicle sales in an amount equal to the difference between: (a) 105 percent or 110 percent of the average wholesale auction price for the vehicle at the time of sale and (b) the vehicle residual value speciﬁed by the Automotive Lease Guide (an authoritative industry source) at the inception of the lease. The potential recovery is calculated for each individual vehicle sold in a particular policy year and is reduced by any gains realized on vehicles sold during the same period. The Company will receive claim proceeds under this insurance program if, in the aggregate, there is a net loss for such period. In addition, the Company obtains separate residual value insurance for all vehicles at lease inception where end of lease term settlement is based solely on the residual value of the individual leased vehicles. Under this program, the potential recovery is computed for each individual vehicle sold and does not allow the insurance carrier to offset individual determined losses with gains from other leases. This individual vehicle coverage is included in the calculation of minimum lease payments when making the capital lease assessment. To reduce the risk associated with collecting insurance claims, the Company monitors the ﬁnancial viability of the insurance carrier based on insurance industry ratings and available ﬁnancial information. Included in the retail leasing portfolio was approximately $4.3 billion of retail leasing residuals at December 31, 2005, compared with $4.0 billion at December 31, 2004. The Company monitors concentrations of leases by manufacturer and vehicle ‘‘make and model.’’ At year-end 2005, no vehicle-type concentration exceeded ﬁve percent of the total number of vehicles in the aggregate portfolio. Because retail residual valuations tend to be less volatile for longer-term leases, relative to the estimated residual at inception of the lease, the Company actively manages lease origination production to achieve a longer- term portfolio. At December 31, 2005, the weighted- average origination term of the portfolio was 51 months. Since early 2003, the wholesale market for used vehicles has been in a period of sustained recovery, resulting in the improvement of residual values. Within vehicle categories, wholesale values for automobiles have performed better than trucks, experiencing an increase in average wholesale prices of 13.6 percent during 2005, while trucks have seen an increase of 2.8 percent. The smaller increase in truck values is attributed to a market decline in demand for full size, midsize, and luxury sport utility vehicles. These models have not experienced price increases as great as automobiles due to the impact of higher gas prices on consumer buying patterns, an oversupply in the marketplace, and the emergence of the crossover segments. The improvement in the used car marketplace combined with the mix of the Company’s lease residual portfolio have reduced the exposure to retail lease residual impairments relative to a year ago. At December 31, 2005, the commercial leasing portfolio had $678 million of residuals, compared with $769 million at December 31, 2004. At year-end 2005, lease residuals related to trucks and other transportation equipment were 25.1 percent of the total residual portfolio. Railcars represented 17.7 percent of the aggregate portfolio, while business and ofﬁce equipment and aircraft were 17.2 percent and 16.6 percent, respectively. No other signiﬁcant concentrations of more than 10 percent existed at December 31, 2005. In 2005, residual values in general improved or remained stable. The transportation industry residual values improved for marine, rail and corporate aircraft. Commercial aircraft continues to experience lower values due to the abundance of supply and technological efﬁciencies on newer models. Operational Risk Management Operational risk represents the risk of loss resulting from the Company’s operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deﬁciency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. The Company operates in many different businesses in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is inherent in all business activities, and the management of this risk is important to the achievement of the Company’s objectives. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employees’ actions, the Company could suffer ﬁnancial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation. U.S. BANCORP 43 The Company manages operational risk through a risk management framework and its internal control processes. Within this framework, the Corporate Risk Committee (‘‘Risk Committee’’) provides oversight and assesses the most signiﬁcant operational risks facing the Company within its business lines. Under the guidance of the Risk Committee, enterprise risk management personnel establish policies and interact with business lines to monitor signiﬁcant operating risks on a regular basis. Business lines have direct and primary responsibility and accountability for identifying, controlling, and monitoring operational risks embedded in their business activities. Business managers maintain a system of controls with the objective of providing proper transaction authorization and execution, proper system operations, safeguarding of assets from misuse or theft, and ensuring the reliability of ﬁnancial and other data. Business managers ensure that the controls are appropriate and are implemented as designed. Each business line within the Company has designated risk managers. These risk managers are responsible for, among other things, coordinating the completion of ongoing risk assessments and ensuring that operational risk management is integrated into business decision-making activities. Business continuation and disaster recovery planning is also critical to effectively manage operational risks. Each business unit of the Company is required to develop, maintain and test these plans at least annually to ensure that recovery activities, if needed, can support mission critical functions including technology, networks and data centers supporting customer applications and business operations. The Company’s internal audit function validates the system of internal controls through risk-based, regular and ongoing audit procedures and reports on the effectiveness of internal controls to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Customer-related business conditions may also increase operational risk or the level of operational losses in certain transaction processing business units, including merchant processing activities. Ongoing risk monitoring of customer activities and their ﬁnancial condition and operational processes serve to mitigate customer-related operational risk. Refer to Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on merchant processing. While the Company believes that it has designed effective methods to minimize operational risks, there is no absolute assurance that business disruption or operational losses would not occur in the event of a disaster. On an ongoing basis, management makes process changes and investments to enhance its systems of internal controls and business continuity and disaster recovery plans. 44 U.S. BANCORP Interest Rate Risk Management In the banking industry, changes in interest rates is a signiﬁcant risk that can impact earnings, market valuations and safety and soundness of an entity. To minimize the volatility of net interest income and of the market value of assets and liabilities, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management activities within guidelines established by its Asset Liability Policy Committee (‘‘ALPC’’) and approved by the Board of Directors. ALPC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with ALPC management policies, including interest rate risk exposure. The Company uses Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis and Market Value of Equity Modeling for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk. Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis One of the primary tools used to measure interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on rate sensitive income and net interest income is simulation analysis. The monthly analysis incorporates substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reﬂect the current interest rate environment. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on interest rate sensitive income of a 300 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one-year period. The simulations also estimate the effect of immediate and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve of 50 basis points as well as the effect of immediate and sustained ﬂattening or steepening of the yield curve. These simulations include assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to be affected by changes in loan and deposit growth. Assumptions are made to project interest rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, management’s outlook and repricing strategies. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis is provided for key variables of the simulation. The results are reviewed by ALPC monthly and are used to guide asset/liability management strategies. The table on page 45 summarizes the interest rate risk of net interest income and rate sensitive income based on forecasts over the succeeding 12 months. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s overall interest rate risk position was liability sensitive to changes in interest rates. Rate sensitive income includes net interest income as well as other income items that are sensitive to interest rates, including asset management fees, mortgage banking and the impact from compensating deposit balances. The Company manages its interest rate risk position by holding assets on the balance sheet with desired interest rate risk characteristics, implementing certain pricing strategies for loans and Sensitivity of Net Interest Income and Rate Sensitive Income: December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 Down 50 Immediate Up 50 Immediate Down 300 Gradual Up 300 Gradual Down 50 Immediate Up 50 Immediate Down 300 Gradual Up 300 Gradual Net interest income ****************** Rate sensitive income **************** .66% .73% (.73)% (.89)% (.30)% (.21)% (2.58)% (3.03)% (.49)% (.40)% .04% (.13)% *% *% (.19)% (.69)% * Due to the level of interest rates at December 31, 2004, a downward 300 basis point scenario could not be computed. deposits and through the selection of derivatives and various funding and investment portfolio strategies. The Company manages the overall interest rate risk proﬁle within policy limits. ALPC policy guidelines limit the estimated change in interest rate sensitive income to 5.0 percent of forecasted interest rate sensitive income over the succeeding 12 months. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company was within its policy guidelines. Market Value of Equity Modeling The Company also utilizes the market value of equity as a measurement tool in managing interest rate sensitivity. The market value of equity measures the degree to which the market values of the Company’s assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments will change given a change in interest rates. ALPC guidelines limit the change in market value of equity in a 200 basis point parallel rate shock to 15 percent of the market value of equity assuming interest rates at December 31, 2005. The up 200 basis point scenario resulted in a 6.8 percent decrease in the market value of equity at December 31, 2005, compared with a 2.7 percent decrease at December 31, 2004. The down 200 basis point scenario resulted in a 4.1 percent decrease in the market value of equity at December 31, 2005, compared with a 4.2 percent decrease at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company was within its policy guidelines. The valuation analysis is dependent upon certain key assumptions about the nature of assets and liabilities with non-contractual maturities. Management estimates the average life and rate characteristics of asset and liability accounts based upon historical analysis and management’s expectation of rate behavior. These assumptions are validated on a periodic basis. A sensitivity analysis of key variables of the valuation analysis is provided to ALPC monthly and is used to guide asset/liability management strategies. The Company also uses duration of equity as a measure of interest rate risk. The duration of equity is a measure of the net market value sensitivity of the assets, liabilities and derivative positions of the Company. The duration of assets was 1.61 years at December 31, 2005, compared with 1.63 years at December 31, 2004. The duration of liabilities was 1.57 years at December 31, 2005, compared with 1.89 years at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2005, the duration of equity was 1.84 years, compared with .12 years at December 31, 2004. The increased duration of equity measure shows that sensitivity of the market value of equity of the Company was liability sensitive to changes in interest rates. Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency risks (‘‘asset and liability management positions’’) and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers (‘‘customer-related positions’’). To manage its interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate options such as caps and ﬂoors. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of ﬁxed-rate and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the interest payments are calculated. Interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates while interest rate ﬂoors protect against declining interest rates. In connection with its mortgage banking operations, the Company enters into forward commitments to sell mortgage loans related to ﬁxed-rate mortgage loans held for sale and ﬁxed-rate mortgage loan commitments. The Company also acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking similar offsetting positions. All interest rate derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value as other assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and are designated as either ‘‘fair value’’ or ‘‘cash ﬂow’’ hedges. The Company performs an assessment, both at inception and quarterly thereafter, when required, to determine whether these derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Hedge ineffectiveness for both cash ﬂow and fair value hedges is recorded in noninterest income. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges, and changes in the fair value of the hedged items, are recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash ﬂow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income until income from the cash ﬂows of the hedged items is realized. Customer-related interest rate swaps, foreign exchange rate contracts, and all other derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value and resulting gains or losses are recorded in trading account gains or losses or mortgage banking revenue. U.S. BANCORP 45 By their nature, derivative instruments are subject to market risk. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. Of the Company’s $30.2 billion of total notional amount of asset and liability management derivative positions at December 31, 2005, $27.4 billion was designated as either fair value or cash flow hedges, or net investment hedges of foreign operations. The cash flow hedge derivative positions are interest rate swaps that hedge the forecasted cash flows from the underlying variable-rate LIBOR loans and floating-rate debt. The fair Table 18 D e r i v a t i v e P o s i t i o n s Asset and Liability Management Positions value hedges are primarily interest rate swaps that hedge the change in fair value related to interest rate changes of underlying fixed-rate debt and subordinated obligations. In addition, the Company uses forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to hedge its interest rate risk related to residential mortgage loans held for sale. The Company commits to sell the loans at speciﬁed prices in a future period, typically within 90 days. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk during the period between issuing a loan commitment and the sale of the loan into the secondary market. Related to its mortgage banking December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Interest rate contracts Receive ﬁxed/pay ﬂoating swaps Notional amount ******************** Weighted-average Receive rate ******************** Pay rate ************************ Pay ﬁxed/receive ﬂoating swaps Notional amount ******************** Weighted-average Receive rate ******************** Pay rate ************************ Futures and forwards ******************* Buy**************************** Sell **************************** Maturing 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter Total Weighted- Average Remaining Maturity In Years Fair Value $ 800 $3,970 $3,750 $1,750 $500 $5,600 $16,370 $ (82) 7.79 3.82% 4.36 4.22% 4.34 3.98% 4.32 4.62% 4.41 4.56% 4.46 6.15% 4.77 4.86% 4.49 $4,450 $3,600 $1,000 $ — $ — $ 113 $ 9,163 $139 1.33 4.32% 2.95 4.29% 3.42 4.37% 3.75 —% — —% — 4.46% 4.91 4.32% 3.24 $ 104 2,669 $ — $ — $ — — — — $ — — $ — — $ 104 2,669 $ — (15) .07 .09 .08 Options Written *************************** Foreign exchange contracts $1,086 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,086 $ 3 Cross-currency swaps Notional amount ******************** Weighted average Receive rate ******************** Pay rate ************************ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 387 $ 387 $ 11 9.61 —% — —% — —% — —% — —% — 3.80% 4.46 3.80% 4.46 Forwards ***************************** $ 404 $ — $ — $ — Equity contracts *********************** $ — $ — $ — $ 42 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ $ 404 42 $ $ 7 3 .05 3.29 Customer-related Positions December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Interest rate contracts Receive ﬁxed/pay ﬂoating swaps Notional amount*********************** Pay ﬁxed/receive ﬂoating swaps Notional amount*********************** Options Purchased**************************** Written ******************************* Risk participation agreements Purchased**************************** Written ******************************* Foreign exchange rate contracts Forwards, spots and swaps Maturing 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter Total Weighted- Average Remaining Maturity In Years Fair Value $1,060 $1,184 $1,653 $959 $1,410 $3,487 $9,753 $(69) 5.25 1,055 1,163 1,633 960 1,403 3,493 9,707 121 5.25 239 239 5 22 642 642 35 3 191 191 3 25 45 46 — — 165 165 21 17 $ 39 39 $ — — 179 179 6 43 37 37 — — 37 37 73 59 1,453 1,453 143 169 $ — $2,042 2,018 — — — 56 56 6 (5) — — $ 77 (73) 1 (1) 2.26 2.26 8.02 4.64 .43 .46 .24 .24 Buy********************************** Sell ********************************** $1,810 1,778 $ 111 118 $ Options Purchased**************************** Written ******************************* 56 56 — — 46 U.S. BANCORP operations, the Company held $1.1 billion of forward commitments to sell mortgage loans and $1.1 billion of unfunded mortgage loan commitments that were derivatives in accordance with the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedge Activities.’’ The unfunded mortgage loan commitments are reported at fair value as options in Table 18. Derivative instruments are also subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to the derivative contracts. Credit risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparties with contracts in a gain position to the Company fail to perform under the terms of the contract. The Company manages this risk through diversiﬁcation of its derivative positions among various counterparties, requiring collateral agreements with credit-rating thresholds, entering into master netting agreements in certain cases and entering into interest rate swap risk participation agreements. These agreements are credit derivatives that transfer the credit risk related to interest rate swaps from the Company to an unafﬁliated third-party. The Company also provides credit protection to third-parties with risk participation agreements, for a fee, as part of a loan syndication transaction. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $10 million in accumulated other comprehensive income related to realized and unrealized losses on derivatives classiﬁed as cash ﬂow hedges. The unrealized losses will be reﬂected in earnings when the related cash ﬂows or hedged transactions occur and will offset the related performance of the hedged items. The estimated amount of gain to be reclassiﬁed from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during the next 12 months is $26 million. Gains or losses on customer-related derivative positions were not material in 2005. The change in fair value of forward commitments attributed to hedge ineffectiveness recorded in noninterest income was a decrease of $4 million in 2005, compared with an increase of $1 million in 2004. The change in the fair value of all other asset and liability management derivative positions attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was a decrease of $2 million in 2005. The Company may enter into derivatives to protect its net investment in certain foreign operations. The Company uses forward commitments to sell specified amounts of certain foreign currencies to hedge its capital volatility risk associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The net amount of gains or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment for 2005 was not material. Table 18 summarizes information on the Company’s derivative positions at December 31, 2005. Refer to Notes 1 and 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for signiﬁcant accounting policies and additional information regarding the Company’s use of derivatives. Market Risk Management In addition to interest rate risk, the Company is exposed to other forms of market risk as a consequence of conducting normal trading activities. Business activities that contribute to market risk include, among other things, proprietary trading and foreign exchange positions. Value at Risk (‘‘VaR’’) is a key measure of market risk for the Company. Theoretically, VaR represents the maximum amount that the Company has placed at risk of loss, with a ninety-ninth percentile degree of conﬁdence, to adverse market movements in the course of its risk taking activities. VaR modeling of trading activities is subject to certain limitations. Additionally, it should be recognized that there are assumptions and estimates associated with VaR modeling, and actual results could differ from those assumptions and estimates. The Company mitigates these uncertainties through regular monitoring of trading activities by management and other risk management practices, including stop-loss and position limits related to its trading activities. Stress-test models are used to provide management with perspectives on market events that VaR models do not capture. The Company establishes market risk limits, subject to approval by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s VaR limit was $20 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004. The market valuation risk inherent in its customer-based derivative trading, mortgage banking pipeline and foreign exchange, as estimated by the VaR analysis, was $1 million at December 31, 2005, and $2 million at December 31, 2004. Liquidity Risk Management ALPC establishes policies, as well as analyzes and manages liquidity, to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public conﬁdence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and wholesale funds. Ultimately, public conﬁdence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The Company’s performance in these areas has enabled it to develop a large and reliable base of core funding within its market areas and in domestic and global capital markets. Liquidity management is viewed from long-term and short-term perspectives, as well as from an asset and liability perspective. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of maturity profiles, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts to minimize funding risk. The Company maintains strategic liquidity and contingency plans that are subject to the availability of asset liquidity in the balance sheet. Monthly, ALPC reviews the U.S. BANCORP 47 Table 19 D E B T R AT I N G S Moody’s Standard & Poor’s U.S. Bancorp Short-term borrowings ****************************************************************** Senior debt and medium-term notes****************************************************** Subordinated debt ********************************************************************* Preferred stock ************************************************************************ Commercial paper********************************************************************** Aa2 Aa3 A1 P-1 U.S. Bank National Association Short-term time deposits **************************************************************** Long-term time deposits **************************************************************** Bank notes**************************************************************************** Subordinated debt ********************************************************************* Commercial paper********************************************************************** P-1 Aa1 Aa1/P-1 Aa2 P-1 AA– A+ A A-1+ A-1+ AA AA/A-1+ AA– A-1+ Fitch F1+ AA– A+ A+ F1+ F1+ AA AA–/F1+ A+ F1+ Company’s ability to meet funding requirements due to adverse business events. These funding needs are then matched with specific asset-based sources to ensure sufficient funds are available. Also, strategic liquidity policies require diversification of wholesale funding sources to avoid concentrations in any one market source. Subsidiary banks are members of various Federal Home Loan Banks (‘‘FHLB’’) that provide a source of funding through FHLB advances. The Company maintains a Grand Cayman branch for issuing eurodollar time deposits. The Company also issues commercial paper through its Canadian branch. In addition, the Company establishes relationships with dealers to issue national market retail and institutional savings certificates and short- and medium-term bank notes. The Company’s subsidiary banks also have significant correspondent banking networks and corporate accounts. Accordingly, the Company has access to national fed funds, funding through repurchase agreements and sources of more stable, regionally-based certificates of deposit and commercial paper. The Company’s ability to raise negotiated funding at competitive prices is inﬂuenced by rating agencies’ views of the Company’s credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. On January 27, 2006, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services upgraded the Company’s credit ratings to AA–/A-1+. Standard & Poor’s also upgraded the Company’s primary banking subsidiaries to an AA long- term debt rating. At January 27, 2006, the credit ratings outlook for the Company was considered ‘‘Stable’’ by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings. The debt ratings noted in Table 19, upgraded for the Standard & Poor’s January of 2006 upgrade, reﬂect the rating agencies’ recognition of the Company’s sector-leading core earnings performance and lower credit risk proﬁle. The parent company’s routine funding requirements consist primarily of operating expenses, dividends to shareholders, debt service, repurchases of common stock and funds used for acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet its obligations from dividends 48 U.S. BANCORP collected from its subsidiaries and the issuance of debt securities. At December 31, 2005, parent company long-term debt outstanding was $10.9 billion, compared with $6.9 billion at December 31, 2004. The $4.0 billion increase was primarily due to issuances of convertible senior debentures of $4.5 billion, medium-term notes of $.5 billion and junior subordinated debentures of $1.0 billion, offset by long-term debt maturities and repayments during 2005. Total parent company debt scheduled to mature in 2006 is $626 million. These debt obligations may be met through medium-term note and capital security issuances and dividends from subsidiaries, as well as from parent company cash and cash equivalents. Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval. The amount of dividends available to the parent company from its banking subsidiaries after meeting the regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized banks was approximately $1.0 billion at December 31, 2005. For further information, see Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Table 20 for further information on signiﬁcant contractual obligations at December 31, 2005. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Off-balance sheet arrangements include any contractual arrangement to which an unconsolidated entity is a party, under which the Company has an obligation to provide credit or liquidity enhancements or market risk support. Off-balance sheet arrangements include certain defined guarantees, asset securitization trusts and conduits. Off-balance sheet arrangements also include any obligation under a variable interest held by an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, credit enhancement or market risk support. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into an array of commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and various forms of guarantees that may be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. The nature and Table 20 C O N T R A C T U A L O B L I G AT I O N S (Dollars in Millions) Contractual Obligations Long-term debt (a) **************************************** Capital leases ******************************************** Operating leases ****************************************** Purchase obligations*************************************** Beneﬁt obligations (b) ************************************** Total***************************************************** Payments Due By Period Over One Through Three Years Over Three Through Five Years $12,874 7 299 136 78 $13,394 $3,499 6 227 19 78 $3,829 Over Five Years $13,006 12 461 — 193 $13,672 Total $37,069 30 1,158 290 386 $38,933 One Year or Less $7,690 5 171 135 37 $8,038 (a) In the banking industry, interest-bearing obligations are principally utilized to fund interest-bearing assets. As such, interest charges on related contractual obligations were excluded from reported amounts as the potential cash outﬂows would have corresponding cash inﬂows from interest-bearing assets. (b) Amounts only include obligations related to the unfunded non-qualiﬁed pension plan and post-retirement medical plans. extent of these arrangements are provided in Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Asset securitizations and conduits represent a source of funding for the Company through off-balance sheet structures. Credit, liquidity, operational and legal structural risks exist due to the nature and complexity of asset securitizations and other off-balance sheet structures. ALPC regularly monitors the performance of each off-balance sheet structure in an effort to minimize these risks and ensure compliance with the requirements of the structures. The Company utilizes its credit risk management systems to evaluate the credit quality of underlying assets and regularly forecasts cash flows to evaluate any potential impairment of retained interests. Also, regulatory guidelines require consideration of asset securitizations in the determination of risk-based capital ratios. The Company does not rely significantly on off-balance sheet arrangements for liquidity or capital resources. The Company sponsors an off-balance sheet conduit, a qualified special purpose entity (‘‘QSPE’’), to which it transferred high-grade investment securities, funded by the issuance of commercial paper. Because QSPE’s are exempt from consolidation under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, ‘‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities’’ (‘‘FIN 46R’’), the Company does not consolidate the conduit structure in its financial statements. The conduit held assets of $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005, and $5.7 billion at December 31, 2004. These investment securities include primarily (i) private label asset-backed securities, which are insurance ‘‘wrapped’’ by AAA/Aaa–rated mono-line insurance companies and (ii) government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005, and $5.7 billion at December 31, 2004. The Company provides a liquidity facility to the conduit. Utilization of the liquidity facility would be triggered if the conduit is unable to, or does not, issue commercial paper to fund its assets. A liability for the estimate of the potential risk of loss the Company has as the liquidity facility provider is recorded on the balance sheet in other liabilities. The liability is adjusted downward over time as the underlying assets pay down with the offset recognized as other noninterest income. The liability for the liquidity facility was $20 million and $32 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded at fair value its retained residual interest in the investment securities conduit of $28 million and $57 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Capital Management The Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder beneﬁt and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. The Company has targeted returning 80 percent of earnings to our shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases. In keeping with this target, the Company returned 90 percent of earnings in 2005. The Company continually assesses its business risks and capital position. The Company also manages its capital to exceed regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized bank holding companies. To achieve these capital goals, the Company employs a variety of capital management tools, including dividends, common share repurchases, and the issuance of subordinated debt and other capital instruments. Total shareholders’ equity was $20.1 billion at December 31, 2005, compared with $19.5 billion at December 31, 2004. The increase was the result of corporate earnings, offset by share repurchases and dividends. On December 20, 2005, the Company increased its dividend rate per common share by 10 percent, from $.30 per quarter to $.33 per quarter. On December 21, 2004, the Company increased its dividend rate per common share by 25.0 percent, from $.24 per quarter to $.30 per quarter. On December 16, 2003, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of common stock over the following 24 months. In 2004, the Company repurchased 89 million shares of common stock under the December 2003 plan. On December 21, 2004, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of common stock during the U.S. BANCORP 49 Table 21 R E G U L AT O RY C A P I TA L R AT I O S At December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 U.S. Bancorp Tangible common equity ************************************************************************************** As a percent of tangible assets ***************************************************************************** Tier 1 capital ************************************************************************************************ As a percent of risk-weighted assets ************************************************************************ As a percent of adjusted quarterly average assets (leverage ratio) *********************************************** Total risk-based capital *************************************************************************************** As a percent of risk-weighted assets ************************************************************************ $11,873 $11,950 5.9% 6.4% $15,145 $14,720 8.2% 7.6% $23,056 12.5% 8.6% 7.9% $22,352 13.1% Bank Subsidiaries U.S. Bank National Association Tier 1 capital ****************************************************************************************** Total risk-based capital ********************************************************************************* Leverage ********************************************************************************************* U.S. Bank National Association ND Tier 1 capital ****************************************************************************************** Total risk-based capital ********************************************************************************* Leverage ********************************************************************************************* Bank Regulatory Capital Requirements 6.5% 10.7 5.9 12.9% 17.0 11.2 6.5% 10.9 5.9 12.7% 17.2 10.8 Minimum Well- Capitalized Tier 1 capital ****************************************************************************************** Total risk-based capital ********************************************************************************* Leverage ********************************************************************************************* 4.0% 8.0 4.0 6.0% 10.0 5.0 next 24 months. This new authorization replaced the December 16, 2003, authorization. During 2004, the Company purchased 5 million shares of common stock under the plan. The average price paid for the 94 million shares repurchased during 2004 was $28.34 per share. In 2005, the Company purchased 62 million shares under the 2004 plan. The average price paid for the shares repurchased in 2005 was $29.37 per share. For a complete analysis of activities impacting shareholders’ equity and capital management programs, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table provides a detailed analysis of all shares repurchased under this authorization during the fourth quarter of 2005: Time Period October ******** November ****** December ****** Number of Shares Purchased (a) 2,188,324 1,581,814 4,860,184 Total ******** 8,630,322 Average Price Paid Per Share Remaining Shares Available to be Purchased $28.16 29.93 30.65 $29.89 89,927,218 88,345,404 83,485,220 83,485,220 (a) All shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2005 were purchased under the publicly announced December 21, 2004, repurchase authorization. Banking regulators deﬁne minimum capital requirements for banks and ﬁnancial services holding companies. These requirements are expressed in the form of a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio, total risk-based capital ratio, and Tier 1 leverage ratio. The minimum required level for these ratios is 4.0 percent, 8.0 percent, and 4.0 percent, respectively. The Company targets its regulatory capital levels, at both the bank and bank holding company level, to 50 U.S. BANCORP exceed the ‘‘well-capitalized’’ threshold for these ratios of 6.0 percent, 10.0 percent, and 5.0 percent, respectively. All regulatory ratios, at both the bank and bank holding company level, continue to be in excess of stated ‘‘well-capitalized’’ requirements. Table 21 provides a summary of capital ratios as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, including Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios, as deﬁned by the regulatory agencies. During 2006, the Company expects to target capital level ratios of 8.5 percent Tier 1 capital and 12.0 percent total risk-based capital on a consolidated basis. F O U RT H Q U A RT E R S U M M A RY The Company reported net income of $1,143 million for the fourth quarter of 2005, or $.62 per diluted share, compared with $1,056 million, or $.56 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2004. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 2.18 percent and 22.6 percent, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2005, compared with returns of 2.16 percent and 21.2 percent, respectively, for the fourth quarter of 2004. The Company’s results for the fourth quarter of 2005 improved over the same period of 2004, as net income rose by $87 million (8.2 percent), primarily due to growth in fee-based products and services and a debt restructuring charge taken in the fourth quarter of 2004, partially offset by a release of the loan loss allowance in the fourth quarter of 2004. In addition, income tax expense was lower in the fourth quarter of 2005, driven by the timing of investments that generate incremental tax credits. In addition, the Company’s results reﬂect an $81 million favorable change in the valuation of MSRs, due to changing longer-term interest rates. These favorable changes were partially offset by higher securities losses of $28 million compared with the fourth quarter of 2004 and additional bankruptcy-related credit losses of approximately $56 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis for the fourth quarter of 2005, was $96 million (3.0 percent) higher than the fourth quarter of 2004, primarily reflecting a 7.7 percent increase in noninterest income due to 9.5 percent growth in fee-based revenue across the majority of fee categories and expansion in payment processing businesses. This was partially offset by the increase in securities losses compared with the fourth quarter of 2004 driven by asset/ liability risk management decisions given the flatter yield curve and continued growth in fixed-rate loan products. Fourth quarter net interest income, on a taxable- equivalent basis was $1,785 million, compared with $1,800 million in the fourth quarter of 2004. Average earning assets increased by $12.2 billion (7.1 percent), primarily driven by a $5.3 billion (35.1 percent) increase in residential mortgages, a $3.6 billion (8.9 percent) increase in total commercial loans and a $2.7 billion (6.3 percent) increase in total retail loans. The positive impact to net interest income from the growth in earning assets was offset by a lower net interest margin. The net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2005 was 3.88 percent, compared with 4.20 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004. The Table 22 F O U RT H Q U A RT E R S U M M A RY decline in net interest margin reﬂected the current lending environment, asset/liability management decisions and the impact of changes in the yield curve from a year ago. Since the fourth quarter of 2004, credit spreads have tightened by approximately 25 basis points across most lending products due to competitive pricing, growth in noninterest-bearing corporate payment card balances and a change in mix due to growth in lower-spread, ﬁxed-rate credit products. The net interest margin also declined due to funding incremental asset growth with higher cost wholesale funding, share repurchases and asset/liability decisions designed to minimize the Company’s rate sensitivity position, including an 18.3 percent reduction in the net receive ﬁxed swap position since December 31, 2004. An increase in the margin beneﬁt of net free funds and loan fees partially offset these factors. Noninterest income in the fourth quarter of 2005 was $1,546 million, compared with $1,435 million in the same period of 2004. The $111 million (7.7 percent) increase was driven by favorable variances in the majority of fee income categories, partially offset by a $28 million reduction in net securities gains (losses). Credit and debit card revenue and corporate payment products revenue were both higher in the fourth quarter of 2005 than the fourth quarter of 2004 by $13 million and $25 million, or 7.1 percent and 24.8 percent, respectively. The growth in credit and debit card revenue was primarily driven by higher transaction volumes. The corporate payment products revenue growth reﬂected growth in sales, card usage, rate changes and the (In Millions, Except Per Share Data) Condensed Income Statement Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) (a)******************************************************************* Noninterest income ******************************************************************************************** Securities gains (losses), net ************************************************************************************ Total net revenue******************************************************************************************* Noninterest expense ******************************************************************************************* Provision for credit losses ************************************************************************************** Income before taxes**************************************************************************************** Taxable-equivalent adjustment ********************************************************************************** Applicable income taxes *************************************************************************************** Net income *********************************************************************************************** Three Months Ended December 31, 2005 2004 $1,785 1,595 (49) 3,331 1,464 205 1,662 10 509 $1,800 1,456 (21) 3,235 1,579 64 1,592 8 528 $1,143 $1,056 Per Common Share Earnings per share ******************************************************************************************** Diluted earnings per share************************************************************************************** Dividends declared per share *********************************************************************************** Average common shares outstanding **************************************************************************** Average diluted common shares outstanding********************************************************************** $ .63 .62 .33 1,816 1,841 Financial Ratios Return on average assets ************************************************************************************** Return on average equity*************************************************************************************** Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis)********************************************************************** Efﬁciency ratio (b)********************************************************************************************** 2.18% 22.6 3.88 43.3 $ .57 .56 .30 1,865 1,894 2.16% 21.2 4.20 48.5 (a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis utilizing a tax rate of 35 percent. (b) Computed as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses), net. U.S. BANCORP 51 acquisition of a small aviation card business. ATM processing services revenue was higher by $18 million (41.9 percent) in the fourth quarter of 2005 than the same quarter of the prior year, primarily due to the expansion of the ATM business in May of 2005. Merchant processing services revenue was higher in the fourth quarter of 2005 than the same quarter of 2004 by $13 million (7.2 percent), reﬂecting an increase in sales volume and new business. Trust and investment management fees increased $17 million (7.1 percent) year-over-year, primarily due to improved equity market conditions and account growth. Deposit service charges increased year-over-year by $26 million (12.3 percent) due to account growth and transaction-related activities. Mortgage banking revenue was higher in the fourth quarter of 2005 than the same quarter of 2004 by $13 million (13.5 percent), due to higher production volumes and increased servicing income. Other income was higher by $27 million (18.9 percent), primarily due to higher income from equity and other investments relative to the same quarter of 2004. Partially offsetting these positive variances, year-over-year, were reductions in commercial products revenue and treasury management fees, which declined by $7 million (6.5 percent) and $6 million (5.5 percent), respectively. The decrease in commercial products revenue was due to reductions in loan- related fees and international product revenue. Treasury management fees declined due to higher earnings credits on customers’ compensating balances relative to a year ago, reﬂecting rising interest rates, partially offset by growth in treasury management-related activities. Noninterest expense was $1,464 million in the fourth quarter of 2005, a decrease of $115 million (7.3 percent) from the fourth quarter of 2004. The decrease in expense year-over-year included the $113 million charge related to the prepayment of the Company’s long-term debt in the prior year and the $81 million favorable change in the MSR valuation. Compensation expense was higher year-over-year by $22 million (3.8 percent), principally due to business expansion, including in-store branches, the Company’s payment processing businesses and other growth initiatives. Employee beneﬁts increased year-over-year by $3 million (3.1 percent), primarily as a result of higher payroll taxes, 401(k) costs and other beneﬁts. Marketing and business development expense increased $15 million (30.6 percent) due to the timing of payment processing business program initiatives in 2005. Technology and communications expense rose by $13 million (11.2 percent), reﬂecting depreciation of technology investments, network costs associated with expansion of the payment processing businesses and higher outside data processing expense principally associated with expanding a prepaid gift program. Other expense increased in the fourth quarter of 2005 from the same quarter of 2004 by $20 million 52 U.S. BANCORP (10.5 percent), primarily due to the $35 million incremental impact from amortization of investments in tax-advantaged projects. The provision for credit losses for the fourth quarter of 2005 was $205 million, an increase of $141 million from the fourth quarter of 2004. The increase in the provision for credit losses year-over-year reflected a $56 million provision in the fourth quarter of 2005 related to charge-offs related to new bankruptcy legislation and a reduction in the allowance for credit losses of $99 million in the fourth quarter of 2004. Net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2005 were $213 million, compared with net charge-offs of $163 million during the fourth quarter of 2004. The provision for income taxes for the fourth quarter of 2005 declined to an effective tax rate of 30.8 percent from an effective tax rate of 33.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004. The decline primarily reﬂected the Company’s decision to increase tax-advantaged investments and the timing of making these investments. The Company expects its effective tax rate to approximate 33 percent in future periods. L I N E O F B U S I N E S S F I N A N C I A L R E V I E W Within the Company, ﬁnancial performance is measured by major lines of business, which include Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, Payment Services, and Treasury and Corporate Support. These operating segments are components of the Company about which ﬁnancial information is available and is evaluated regularly in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Basis of Presentation Business line results are derived from the Company’s business unit proﬁtability reporting systems by speciﬁcally attributing managed balance sheet assets, deposits and other liabilities and their related income or expense. Goodwill and other intangible assets are assigned to the lines of business based on the mix of business of the acquired entity. Within the Company, capital levels are evaluated and managed centrally; however, capital is allocated to the operating segments to support evaluation of business performance. Capital allocations to the business lines are based on the amount of goodwill and other intangibles, the extent of off-balance sheet managed assets and lending commitments and the ratio of on-balance sheet assets relative to the total Company. Certain lines of business, such as Private Client, Trust and Asset Management, have no signiﬁcant balance sheet components. For these business units, capital is allocated taking into consideration ﬁduciary and operational risk, capital levels of independent organizations operating similar businesses, and regulatory requirements. Interest income and expense is determined based on the assets and liabilities managed by the business line. Because funding and asset liability management is a central function, funds transfer-pricing methodologies are utilized to allocate a cost of funds used or credit for funds provided to all business line assets and liabilities, respectively, using a matched funding concept. Also, the business unit is allocated the taxable-equivalent beneﬁt of tax-exempt products. Noninterest income and expenses directly managed by each business line, including fees, service charges, salaries and beneﬁts, and other direct costs are accounted for within each segment’s ﬁnancial results in a manner similar to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements. Occupancy costs are allocated based on utilization of facilities by the lines of business. Operating losses are charged to the line of business when the loss event is realized in a manner similar to a loan charge-off. Noninterest expenses incurred by centrally managed operations or business lines that directly support another business line’s operations are charged to the applicable business line based on its utilization of those services primarily measured by the volume of customer activities, number of employees or other relevant factors. These allocated expenses are reported as net shared services expense within noninterest expense. Certain activities that do not directly support the operations of the lines of business or for which the line of business is not considered accountable are not charged to the lines of business. The income or expenses associated with these corporate activities is reported within the Treasury and Corporate Support line of business. The provision for credit losses within the Wholesale Banking, Consumer Banking, Private Client, Trust and Asset Management and Payment Services lines of business is based on net charge-offs, while Treasury and Corporate Support reﬂects the residual component of the Company’s total consolidated provision for credit losses determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a standard tax rate with the residual tax expense or beneﬁt to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support. Designations, assignments and allocations change from time to time as management systems are enhanced, methods of evaluating performance or product lines change or business segments are realigned to better respond to our diverse customer base. During 2005, certain organization and methodology changes were made and, accordingly, 2004 results were restated and presented on a comparable basis. Due to organizational and methodology changes, the Company’s basis of ﬁnancial presentation differed in 2003. The presentation of comparative business line results for 2003 is not practical and has not been provided. Wholesale Banking offers lending, depository, treasury management and other ﬁnancial services to middle market, large corporate and public sector clients. Wholesale Banking contributed $1,063 million of the Company’s net income in 2005, an increase of $79 million (8.0 percent), compared with 2004. The increase was primarily driven by growth in total net revenue and reductions in total noninterest expense and the provision for credit losses. Total net revenue increased $71 million (3.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $63 million (4.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, driven by growth in average loan balances of approximately $2.6 billion and wider spreads on deposits due to the funding beneﬁt associated with the impact of rising interest rates, partially offset by reduced loan spreads due to competitive pricing. The increase in average loans was driven by stronger commercial loan demand beginning in late 2004 and continuing throughout 2005. Total deposits increased year-over-year, driven by growth in time deposits, partially offset by decreases in noninterest-bearing and interest checking deposits. Average savings products balances in 2005 were also lower than 2004. The shift in mix of deposits is partially due to the result of deposit pricing by the Company for money market products in relation to other ﬁxed-rate deposits offered. The $8 million (1.0 percent) increase in noninterest income in 2005, compared with 2004, was due to higher revenue from equity investments, partially offset by reductions in treasury management fees and other commercial loan fees. Treasury management fees declined due to higher earnings credits on customers’ compensating balances, partially offset by growth in treasury management-related activities. Noninterest expense decreased $7 million (.8 percent) in 2005 compared to 2004, due to reductions in net shared services, fraud losses and other loan expenses, partially offset by an increase in personnel expenses. The provision for credit losses decreased $46 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The favorable change in the provision for credit losses during 2005, was due to improving credit quality in the commercial loan portfolio resulting in net recoveries of $24 million in 2005, compared with net charge-offs of $22 million in 2004. Nonperforming assets within Wholesale Banking were $242 million at December 31, 2005, compared with $387 million at December 31, 2004. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of end-of-period loans were .54 percent at December 31, 2005, compared with .91 percent at December 31, 2004. Refer to the ‘‘Corporate Risk Proﬁle’’ section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios. U.S. BANCORP 53 Consumer Banking delivers products and services through banking ofﬁces, telephone servicing and sales, on-line services, direct mail and ATMs. It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, in-store banking, small business banking, including lending guaranteed by the Small Business Administration, small-ticket leasing, consumer lending, mortgage banking, consumer ﬁnance, workplace banking, student banking, 24-hour banking and investment product and insurance sales. Consumer Banking contributed $1,788 million of the Company’s net income in 2005, an increase of $315 million (21.4 percent), compared with 2004. While the retail banking business grew net income 23.6 percent in 2005, the contribution of the mortgage banking business declined 1.6 percent, compared with 2004. Total net revenue increased $495 million (8.9 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $332 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The year-over-year increase in net interest income was due to strong growth in average loans and the funding beneﬁt of deposits due to rising interest rates. Partially offsetting these increases were reduced spreads on commercial and retail loans due to competitive pricing. The increase in average loan balances reﬂected growth in retail loans, residential mortgages, commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. Included within the retail loan category are second-lien home equity loans, installment loans and retail leases which had a growth rate of 6.6 percent, 10.1 percent and 10.4 percent, respectively, in 2005, compared with the prior year. Residential mortgages, including traditional residential mortgages and ﬁrst-lien home equity loans, grew 26.2 percent in 2005, compared with 2004, reﬂecting the Company’s decision to retain adjustable-rate residential mortgages. The year-over- year decrease in average deposits of .7 percent reﬂected a reduction in noninterest-bearing deposits and savings products, offset by growth in interest checking and time deposits. The decline in noninterest-bearing deposits in 2005, compared with the prior year, was primarily due to the Company’s decision to migrate $1.3 billion of certain high-value customer accounts to interest checking as an Table 23 L I N E O F B U S I N E S S F I N A N C I A L P E R F O R M A N C E Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Condensed Income Statement Net interest income (taxable-equivalent basis) ******************************** Noninterest income ******************************************************* Securities gains (losses), net *********************************************** Total net revenue****************************************************** Noninterest expense ****************************************************** Other intangibles ********************************************************* Total noninterest expense ********************************************** Income before provision and income taxes **************************** Provision for credit losses ************************************************* Income before income taxes *********************************************** Income taxes and taxable-equivalent adjustment****************************** Wholesale Banking Consumer Banking 2005 2004 Percent Change 2005 2004 Percent Change $ 1,645 825 (4) $ 1,582 811 2 4.0% 1.7 * $ 4,005 2,056 — $ 3,673 1,893 — 2,466 803 16 819 1,647 (24) 1,671 608 2,395 808 18 826 1,569 22 1,547 563 3.0 (.6) (11.1) (.8) 5.0 * 8.0 8.0 8.0 6,061 2,687 253 2,940 3,121 311 2,810 1,022 5,566 2,626 248 2,874 2,692 376 2,316 843 $ 1,788 $ 1,473 9.0% 8.6 — 8.9 2.3 2.0 2.3 15.9 (17.3) 21.3 21.2 21.4 Net income ************************************************************** $ 1,063 $ 984 Average Balance Sheet Data Commercial ************************************************************* Commercial real estate **************************************************** Residential mortgages **************************************************** Retail ******************************************************************* Total loans *********************************************************** Goodwill **************************************************************** Other intangible assets **************************************************** Assets ****************************************************************** Noninterest-bearing deposits *********************************************** Interest checking ********************************************************* Savings products********************************************************* Time deposits *********************************************************** Total deposits********************************************************* Shareholders’ equity ****************************************************** $28,711 15,697 63 34 $26,271 15,538 67 49 9.3% 1.0 (6.0) (30.6) $ 8,652 11,549 17,569 34,106 $ 8,171 10,973 13,921 31,325 5.9% 5.2 26.2 8.9 44,505 1,225 70 50,391 12,189 3,085 5,290 12,681 33,245 5,085 41,925 1,225 88 48,192 12,473 3,380 6,078 7,429 29,360 5,034 6.2 — (20.5) 4.6 (2.3) (8.7) (13.0) 70.7 13.2 1.0 71,876 2,243 1,189 80,404 13,232 17,301 24,255 17,259 72,047 6,531 64,390 2,243 1,073 72,408 14,213 15,087 27,162 16,099 72,561 6,272 11.6 — 10.8 11.0 (6.9) 14.7 (10.7) 7.2 (.7) 4.1 * Not meaningful 54 U.S. BANCORP enhancement to its Silver Elite Checking product in late 2004. The year-over-year increase in interest checking balances reﬂected this migration of the Silver Elite product and strong branch-based new account deposit growth. On a combined basis, the Consumer Banking line of business generated growth of $1.2 billion (4.2 percent) in average checking account balances in 2005, compared with 2004, driven by 6.1 percent growth in net new checking accounts. Offsetting this growth was a reduction in average savings balances of $2.9 billion (10.7 percent) from 2004, principally related to money market accounts. The decline reﬂected deposit pricing by the Company for money market products in relation to other ﬁxed-rate deposits offered. Average time deposit balances grew $1.2 billion (7.2 percent) in 2005, compared with the prior year, as a portion of money market balances migrated to time deposit products. Fee-based noninterest income increased $163 million in 2005, compared with 2004, driven by strong deposit service charges and mortgage banking revenue growth, partially offset by lower treasury management fees. Deposit service charges were higher due to new account growth and higher transaction-related service activities. The growth in mortgage banking revenue was due to strong loan production generating origination fees and gains from production volumes and increased servicing income. Noninterest expense increased $66 million (2.3 percent) in 2005, compared with the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to compensation and employee beneﬁts expense, reﬂecting the impact of adding thirty-six in-store and thirteen traditional branches during 2005 and production-based incentives. The provision for credit losses decreased $65 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The improvement was primarily attributable to strong credit quality during the year. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs declined to .43 percent in 2005, compared with .58 percent in 2004. The decline in net charge-offs included both the commercial and retail loan portfolios. The $44 million improvement in commercial loan net charge- offs in 2005, compared with 2004, was broad-based across most industry and geographical regions. Retail loan net Private Client, Trust and Asset Management Payment Services Treasury and Corporate Support Consolidated Company 2005 2004 Percent Change 2005 2004 Percent Change 2005 2004 Percent Change 2005 2004 Percent Change 25.1% $ 2.1% $ $ 454 1,040 — 1,494 668 60 728 766 5 761 277 $ 363 1,001 — 1,364 673 62 735 629 10 619 225 $ 484 $ 394 3.9 — 9.5 (.7) (3.2) (1.0) 21.8 (50.0) 22.9 23.1 22.8 575 2,185 — 2,760 1,074 176 1,250 1,510 386 1,124 409 $ 563 1,885 — 2,448 893 161 1,054 1,394 364 1,030 374 15.9 — 12.7 20.3 9.3 18.6 8.3 6.0 9.1 9.4 9.0 409 45 (102) 352 173 (47) 126 226 (12) 238 (201) $ 959 34 (107) 886 235 61 296 590 (103) 693 33 (57.4)% $ 7,088 6,151 32.4 (106) 4.7 $ 7,140 5,624 (105) (60.3) (26.4) * (57.4) (61.7) (88.3) (65.7) * 13,133 5,405 458 5,863 7,270 666 6,604 2,115 12,659 5,235 550 5,785 6,874 669 6,205 2,038 $ 715 $ 656 $ 439 $ 660 (33.5) $ 4,489 $ 4,167 $ 1,594 632 398 2,334 $ 1,647 619 324 2,229 (3.2)% $ 3,526 — 2.1 — 22.8 7,941 4.7 4,958 846 310 6,719 3,600 2,394 5,554 1,482 4,819 818 352 6,587 3,264 2,459 5,454 590 13,030 2,120 11,767 2,077 2.9 3.4 (11.9) 2.0 10.3 (2.6) 1.8 * 10.7 2.1 11,467 2,030 960 15,278 171 — 16 3 190 3,587 $ 3,068 — — 7,549 10,617 1,867 776 13,765 108 — 11 — 119 3,198 14.9% $ — — 5.2 8.0 8.7 23.7 11.0 58.3 — 45.5 * 59.7 12.2 158 86 6 49 299 — 4 50,406 37 5 18 2,429 2,489 2,630 $ 191 137 10 52 390 — 7 50,641 (242) 7 15 2,635 2,415 2,878 (17.3)% $ 42,641 27,964 (37.2) 18,036 (40.0) 44,464 (5.8) (23.3) — (42.9) (.5) * (28.6) 20.0 (7.8) 3.1 (8.6) 133,105 6,344 2,533 203,198 29,229 22,785 35,133 33,854 121,001 19,953 $ 39,348 27,267 14,322 41,204 122,141 6,153 2,296 191,593 29,816 20,933 38,720 26,753 116,222 19,459 (.7)% 9.4 (1.0) 3.7 3.2 (16.7) 1.3 5.8 (.4) 6.4 3.8 7.7 8.4% 2.6 25.9 7.9 9.0 3.1 10.3 6.1 (2.0) 8.8 (9.3) 26.5 4.1 2.5 U.S. BANCORP 55 charge-offs declined by $12 million in 2005, compared to 2004, primarily resulting from ongoing collection efforts and risk management activities. Nonperforming assets within Consumer Banking were $341 million at December 31, 2005, and $353 million at December 31, 2004. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of end-of- period loans were .47 percent at December 31, 2005, and .56 percent at December 31, 2004. Refer to the ‘‘Corporate Risk Proﬁle’’ section for further information on factors impacting the credit quality of the loan portfolios. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management provides trust, private banking, ﬁnancial advisory, investment management and mutual fund servicing through ﬁve businesses: Private Client Group, Corporate Trust, Asset Management, Institutional Trust and Custody and Fund Services. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management contributed $484 million of the Company’s net income in 2005, or an increase of $90 million (22.8 percent), compared with 2004. The growth was primarily attributable to strong revenue growth in this business line. Total net revenue increased $130 million (9.5 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased $91 million (25.1 percent) in 2005, compared with the prior year, due to 10.7 percent growth in average deposits and the favorable impact of rising interest rates on the funding beneﬁt of customer deposits. The increase in total deposits was attributable to growth in noninterest-bearing deposits and time deposits, principally in Corporate Trust. Noninterest income increased $39 million (3.9 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, driven by improved equity market conditions and account growth. Noninterest expense decreased $7 million (1.0 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, primarily due to reductions in operating losses and net shared services, partially offset by higher personnel-related costs. The provision for credit losses decreased $5 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The decrease was due to a reduction in net charge-offs. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding were .10 percent in 2005, compared with .21 percent in 2004. Payment Services includes consumer and business credit cards, stored-value cards, debit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing and merchant processing. Payment Services contributed $715 million of the Company’s net income in 2005, or an increase of $59 million (9.0 percent), compared with 2004. The increase was due to growth in total net revenue, partially offset by increases in total noninterest expense and the provision for loan losses. Total net revenue increased $312 million (12.7 percent) in 2005, compared 2004. The 2005 increase in net interest 56 U.S. BANCORP income of $12 million, compared with the prior year, was attributable to increases in retail and commercial credit card balances and customer late fees, partially offset by corporate card rebates and the margin impact of higher non-earning assets. Noninterest income increased $300 million (15.9 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. The increase in fee-based revenue was driven by strong growth in credit and debit card revenue, corporate payment products revenue, ATM processing services revenue and merchant processing revenue. Credit and debit card revenue increased primarily due to higher customer transaction volumes and rate changes from a year ago. Corporate payment products revenue increased primarily due to growth in sales volume, card usage, rate changes and the recent acquisition of a small aviation card business. ATM processing services revenue increased primarily due to the expansion of the business through the acquisition of a small ATM processing company in the second quarter of 2005. Merchant processing revenue increased due to increases in merchant sales volume and business expansion in European markets. Noninterest expense increased $196 million (18.6 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, primarily due to higher compensation and employee beneﬁt costs for processing associated with increased credit and debit card transaction volumes, higher corporate payment products and merchant processing sales volumes, higher ATM processing services volumes due to the ATM business acquisition and higher merchant acquiring costs resulting from the expansion of the merchant acquiring business and increases in transaction volume year-over-year. The provision for credit losses increased $22 million in 2005, compared with 2004, due to higher net charge-offs. The unfavorable change in credit losses was primarily driven by additional charge-offs related to new bankruptcy legislation. As a percentage of average loans outstanding, net charge-offs were 3.37 percent in 2005, compared with 3.42 percent in 2004. Treasury and Corporate Support includes the Company’s investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and the residual aggregate of those expenses associated with corporate activities that are managed on a consolidated basis. Treasury and Corporate Support recorded net income of $439 million in 2005, or a decrease of $221 million, compared with 2004. Total net revenue decreased $534 million (60.3 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004, primarily due to a decrease in net interest income. Net interest income was $409 million, or 5.8 percent of consolidated net interest income, in 2005 compared with $959 million, or 13.4 percent of consolidated net interest income, in 2004. The decline of $550 million reﬂected asset/liability management decisions to borrow more in the capital markets, a higher interest rate environment and the reduction of net receive ﬁxed swap positions as short-term rates have risen over the past eighteen months. Noninterest expense decreased $170 million (57.4 percent) in 2005, compared with 2004. The year- over-year decrease reﬂected a favorable change in the MSR valuation and lower debt prepayment charges, partially offset by higher personnel expenses. Noninterest expense in 2005 included MSR reparation of $53 million, compared with MSR impairment of $57 million in 2004. The change in MSR valuations was driven by higher interest rates and declining prepayment speeds in 2005, compared with 2004. Debt prepayment charges were $54 million in 2005, compared with $155 million in 2004. The provision for credit losses for this business unit represents the residual aggregate of the net credit losses allocated to the reportable business units and the Company’s recorded provision determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The provision for credit losses was a net recovery of $12 million in 2005, compared with $103 million in 2004. Refer to the ‘‘Corporate Risk Proﬁle’’ section for further information on the provision for credit losses, nonperforming assets and factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses. Income taxes are assessed to each line of business at a managerial tax rate of 36.4 percent with the residual tax expense or beneﬁt to arrive at the consolidated effective tax rate included in Treasury and Corporate Support. The $234 million favorable change in income tax expense reﬂected a consolidated effective tax rate of 31.7 percent in 2005, compared with 32.5 percent in 2004. The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2004 primarily reﬂected higher tax exempt income from investment securities and insurance products and incremental tax credits generated from investments in affordable housing and similar tax- advantaged projects. A C C O U N T I N G C H A N G E S Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses accounting standards recently issued but not yet required to be adopted and the expected impact of the changes in accounting standards. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards affects the Company’s ﬁnancial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. C R I T I C A L A C C O U N T I N G P O L I C I E S The accounting and reporting policies of the Company comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of ﬁnancial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The ﬁnancial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding the Company’s ﬁnancial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s ﬁnancial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difﬁcult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of ﬁnancial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are signiﬁcant to the ﬁnancial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third-parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under generally accepted accounting principles. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies with the Company’s Audit Committee. Signiﬁcant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Those policies considered to be critical accounting policies are described below. Allowance for Credit Losses The allowance for credit losses is established to provide for probable losses inherent in the Company’s credit portfolio. The methods utilized to estimate the allowance for credit losses, key assumptions and quantitative and qualitative information considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are discussed in the ‘‘Credit Risk Management’’ section. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is often the most critical of accounting estimates for a banking institution. It is an inherently subjective process impacted by many factors as discussed throughout the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the Annual Report. Although risk management practices, methodologies and other tools are utilized to determine each element of the allowance, degrees of imprecision exist in these measurement tools due in part to subjective judgments involved and an inherent lagging of credit quality measurements relative to the stage of the business cycle. Even determining the stage of the business U.S. BANCORP 57 cycle is highly subjective. As discussed in the ‘‘Analysis and Determination of Allowance for Credit Losses’’ section, management considers the effect of imprecision and many other factors in determining the allowance for credit losses by establishing an ‘‘allowance for other factors’’ that is not speciﬁcally allocated to a category of loans. If not considered, inherent losses in the portfolio related to imprecision and other subjective factors could have a dramatic adverse impact on the liquidity and ﬁnancial viability of a bank. Given the many subjective factors affecting the credit portfolio, changes in the allowance for credit losses may not directly coincide with changes in the risk ratings of the credit portfolio reﬂected in the risk rating process. This is in part due to the timing of the risk rating process in relation to changes in the business cycle, the exposure and mix of loans within risk rating categories, levels of nonperforming loans and the timing of charge-offs and recoveries. For example, the amount of loans within speciﬁc risk ratings may change, providing a leading indicator of improving credit quality, while nonperforming loans and net charge- offs continue at elevated levels. Also, inherent loss ratios, determined through migration analysis and historical loss performance over the estimated business cycle of a loan, may not change to the same degree as net charge-offs. Because risk ratings and inherent loss ratios primarily drive the allowance speciﬁcally allocated to commercial loans, the amount of the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans might decline; however, the degree of change differs somewhat from the level of changes in nonperforming loans and net charge-offs. Also, management would maintain an adequate allowance for credit losses by increasing the allowance for other factors during periods of economic uncertainty or changes in the business cycle. Some factors considered in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses are quantifiable while other factors require qualitative judgment. Management conducts analysis with respect to the accuracy of risk ratings and the volatility of inherent losses, and utilizes this analysis along with qualitative factors including uncertainty in the economy from changes in unemployment rates, the level of bankruptcies, concentration risks, including risks associated with the airline industry sector and highly leveraged enterprise-value credits, in determining the overall level of the allowance for credit losses. The Company’s determination of the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate loans is sensitive to the assigned credit risk ratings and inherent loss rates at December 31, 2005. In the event that 10 percent of loans within these portfolios experienced downgrades of two risk categories, the allowance for commercial and commercial real estate would increase by approximately $264 million at December 31, 2005. In the event that inherent loss or estimated loss rates for these 58 U.S. BANCORP portfolios increased by 10 percent, the allowance determined for commercial and commercial real estate would increase by approximately $92 million at December 31, 2005. The Company’s determination of the allowance for residential and retail loans is sensitive to changes in estimated loss rates. In the event that estimated loss rates increased by 10%, the allowance for residential mortgages and retail loans would increase by approximately $60 million at December 31, 2005. Because several quantitative and qualitative factors are considered in determining the allowance for credit losses, these sensitivity analyses do not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the allowance for credit losses. They are intended to provide insights into the impact of adverse changes in risk rating and inherent losses and do not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk rating or loss rates. Given current processes employed by the Company, management believes the risk ratings and inherent loss rates currently assigned are appropriate. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions that could be significant to the Company’s financial statements. Refer to the ‘‘Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Credit Losses’’ section for further information. Mortgage Servicing Rights MSRs are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained. The total cost of loans sold is allocated between the loans sold and the servicing assets retained based on their relative fair values. MSRs that are purchased from others are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of the MSRs is amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing revenue and recorded in noninterest expense as amortization of intangible assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically reviewed for impairment using a lower of carrying value or fair value methodology. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are stratified based on the underlying loan type and note rate and the carrying value for each stratum is compared to fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. If the carrying value is greater than fair value, impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum and recorded as amortization of intangible assets. The reduction in the fair value of MSRs at December 31, 2005, to immediate 25 and 50 basis point adverse changes in interest rates would be approximately $47 million and $109 million, respectively. An upward movement in interest rates at December 31, 2005, of 25 and 50 basis points would increase the value of the MSRs by approximately $32 million and $58 million, respectively. Refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding MSRs. Goodwill and Other Intangibles The Company records all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangibles, at fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, ‘‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.’’ Goodwill and indeﬁnite-lived assets are no longer amortized but are subject, at a minimum, to annual tests for impairment. Under certain situations, interim impairment tests may be required if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting segment below its carrying amount. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives using straight-line and accelerated methods and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and subsequent impairment analysis require management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates of how the acquired assets will perform in the future using valuation methods including discounted cash flow analysis. Additionally, estimated cash flows may extend beyond ten years and, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended timeframe. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces, customer behaviors and attrition, changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, changes in discount rates and specific industry and market conditions. In determining the reasonableness of cash flow estimates, the Company reviews historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets in an effort to assess and validate assumptions utilized in its estimates. In assessing the fair value of reporting units, the Company may consider the stage of the current business cycle and potential changes in market conditions in estimating the timing and extent of future cash ﬂows. Also, management often utilizes other information to validate the reasonableness of its valuations including public market comparables, and multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses. Valuation multiples may be based on revenue, price-to-earnings and tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies and business segments. These multiples may be adjusted to consider competitive differences including size, operating leverage and other factors. The carrying amount of a reporting unit is determined based on the capital required to support the reporting unit’s activities including its tangible and intangible assets. The determination of a reporting unit’s capital allocation requires management judgment and considers many factors including the regulatory capital regulations and capital characteristics of comparable public companies in relevant industry sectors. In certain circumstances, management will engage a third-party to independently validate its assessment of the fair value of its business segments. The Company’s annual assessment of potential goodwill impairment was completed during the second quarter of 2005. Based on the results of this assessment, no goodwill impairment was recognized. Income Taxes The Company estimates income tax expense based on amounts expected to be owed to various tax jurisdictions. Currently, the Company ﬁles tax returns in approximately 140 federal, state and local domestic jurisdictions and 10 foreign jurisdictions. The estimated income tax expense is reported in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions either currently or in the future and are reported in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In estimating accrued taxes, the Company assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment considering statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of the tax position. Because of the complexity of tax laws and regulations, interpretation can be difﬁcult and subject to legal judgment given speciﬁc facts and circumstances. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach different reasonable conclusions regarding the estimated amounts of accrued taxes. Changes in the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by various taxing authorities, and newly enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative merits and risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, affect accrued taxes and can be signiﬁcant to the operating results of the Company. Refer to Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding income taxes. C O N T R O L S A N D P R O C E D U R E S Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive ofﬁcer and principal ﬁnancial ofﬁcer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’)). Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive ofﬁcer and principal ﬁnancial ofﬁcer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. U.S. BANCORP 59 During the most recently completed ﬁscal quarter, there The annual report of the Company’s management on was no change made in the Company’s internal controls over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is provided on page 101. The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent accountants, regarding the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is provided on page 103. 60 U.S. BANCORP (This page intentionally left blank) U.S. BANCORP 61 U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET At December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Assets Cash and due from banks *********************************************************************************** Investment securities Held-to-maturity (fair value $113 and $132, respectively) ****************************************************** Available-for-sale***************************************************************************************** Loans held for sale ****************************************************************************************** Loans Commercial ********************************************************************************************* Commercial real estate *********************************************************************************** Residential mortgages ************************************************************************************ Retail ************************************************************************************************** Total loans ******************************************************************************************* Less allowance for loan losses ********************************************************************** Net loans **************************************************************************************** Premises and equipment************************************************************************************* Customers’ liability on acceptances *************************************************************************** Goodwill *************************************************************************************************** Other intangible assets ************************************************************************************** Other assets *********************************************************************************************** 2005 2004 $ 8,004 $ 6,336 109 39,659 1,686 42,942 28,463 20,730 45,671 137,806 (2,041) 135,765 1,841 61 7,005 2,874 12,461 127 41,354 1,439 40,173 27,585 15,367 43,190 126,315 (2,080) 124,235 1,890 95 6,241 2,387 11,000 Total assets ****************************************************************************************** $209,465 $195,104 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Deposits Noninterest-bearing ************************************************************************************** Interest-bearing****************************************************************************************** Time deposits greater than $100,000*********************************************************************** $ 32,214 70,024 22,471 Total deposits **************************************************************************************** Short-term borrowings *************************************************************************************** Long-term debt ********************************************************************************************* Acceptances outstanding ************************************************************************************ Other liabilities ********************************************************************************************** 124,709 20,200 37,069 61 7,340 Total liabilities **************************************************************************************** 189,379 Shareholders’ equity Common stock, par value $0.01 a share — authorized: 4,000,000,000 shares issued: 2005 and 2004 — 1,972,643,007 shares ********************************************************************************* Capital surplus ****************************************************************************************** Retained earnings *************************************************************************************** Less cost of common stock in treasury: 2005 — 157,689,004 shares; 2004 — 115,020,064 shares***************** Other comprehensive income****************************************************************************** Total shareholders’ equity ****************************************************************************** 20 5,907 19,001 (4,413) (429) 20,086 $ 30,756 71,936 18,049 120,741 13,084 34,739 95 6,906 175,565 20 5,902 16,758 (3,125) (16) 19,539 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity ****************************************************************** $209,465 $195,104 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 62 U.S. BANCORP U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME Year Ended December 31 (Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2005 2004 2003 Interest Income Loans ************************************************************************************** Loans held for sale *************************************************************************** Investment securities ************************************************************************* Other interest income ************************************************************************* Total interest income ******************************************************************* $ 8,381 106 1,954 110 10,551 Interest Expense Deposits ************************************************************************************ Short-term borrowings ************************************************************************ Long-term debt ****************************************************************************** Total interest expense ****************************************************************** Net interest income ************************************************************************** Provision for credit losses ********************************************************************* Net interest income after provision for credit losses *********************************************** Noninterest Income Credit and debit card revenue ***************************************************************** Corporate payment products revenue *********************************************************** ATM processing services ********************************************************************** Merchant processing services****************************************************************** Trust and investment management fees ********************************************************* Deposit service charges*********************************************************************** Treasury management fees ******************************************************************** Commercial products revenue ***************************************************************** Mortgage banking revenue ******************************************************************** Investment products fees and commissions ***************************************************** Securities gains (losses), net ******************************************************************* Other*************************************************************************************** Total noninterest income **************************************************************** Noninterest Expense Compensation ******************************************************************************* Employee beneﬁts**************************************************************************** Net occupancy and equipment **************************************************************** Professional services ************************************************************************* Marketing and business development *********************************************************** Technology and communications *************************************************************** Postage, printing and supplies ***************************************************************** Other intangibles ***************************************************************************** Debt prepayment **************************************************************************** Other*************************************************************************************** Total noninterest expense *************************************************************** Income from continuing operations before income taxes ******************************************* Applicable income taxes ********************************************************************** Income from continuing operations ************************************************************* Income from discontinued operations (after-tax) ************************************************** Net income ********************************************************************************* 1,559 690 1,247 3,496 7,055 666 6,389 713 488 229 770 1,009 928 437 400 432 152 (106) 593 6,045 2,383 431 641 166 235 466 255 458 54 774 5,863 6,571 2,082 4,489 — $7,168 91 1,827 100 9,186 904 263 908 2,075 7,111 669 6,442 649 407 175 675 981 807 467 432 397 156 (105) 478 5,519 2,252 389 631 149 194 430 248 550 155 787 5,785 6,176 2,009 4,167 — $7,272 202 1,684 100 9,258 1,097 167 805 2,069 7,189 1,254 5,935 561 361 166 561 954 716 466 401 367 145 245 370 5,313 2,177 328 644 143 180 418 246 682 — 779 5,597 5,651 1,941 3,710 23 $ 4,489 $4,167 $3,733 Earnings Per Share Income from continuing operations ********************************************************** Discontinued operations ******************************************************************* Net income ****************************************************************************** Diluted Earnings Per Share Income from continuing operations ********************************************************** Discontinued operations ******************************************************************* Net income ****************************************************************************** Dividends declared per share ****************************************************************** Average common shares outstanding *********************************************************** Average diluted common shares outstanding **************************************************** $ $ $ $ 2.45 — 2.45 2.42 — 2.42 1.230 1,831 1,857 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. $ 2.21 — $ 2.21 $ 2.18 — $ 2.18 1.020 1,887 1,913 $ 1.93 .01 $ 1.94 $ 1.92 .01 $ 1.93 .855 1,924 1,936 U.S. BANCORP 63 U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Dollars and Shares in Millions) Balance December 31, 2002 ***************** Net income ************************************** Unrealized loss on securities available for sale ******** Unrealized loss on derivatives ********************** Foreign currency translation adjustment ************** Realized gain on derivatives ************************ Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for gains realized in net income ************************************** Income taxes ************************************ Total comprehensive income ***************** Cash dividends declared on common stock ********** Special dividends declared on common stock ******** Issuance of common and treasury stock ************* Purchase of treasury stock************************* Stock option and restricted stock grants ************* Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations************************************ Common Shares Outstanding Common Stock Capital Surplus Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Other Comprehensive Income Total Shareholders’ Equity 1,917 $20 $5,799 $13,105 3,733 $(1,272) $ 784 (716) (373) 23 199 (288) 439 22 (15) (1) (1,645) (685) (51) 111 (8) 502 (417) (18) $18,436 3,733 (716) (373) 23 199 (288) 439 3,017 (1,645) (685) 451 (417) 111 (26) Balance December 31, 2003 ***************** 1,923 $20 $5,851 $14,508 $(1,205) $ 68 $19,242 Net income ************************************** Unrealized loss on securities available for sale ******** Unrealized loss on derivatives ********************** Foreign currency translation adjustment ************** Realized gain on derivatives ************************ Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for losses realized in net income ************************************** Income taxes ************************************ Total comprehensive income ***************** Cash dividends declared on common stock ********** Issuance of common and treasury stock ************* Purchase of treasury stock************************* Stock option and restricted stock grants ************* Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations************************************ 4,167 (1,917) 30 (94) (1) (96) 116 31 772 (2,656) (36) (123) (43) (17) 16 32 51 4,167 (123) (43) (17) 16 32 51 4,083 (1,917) 676 (2,656) 116 (5) Balance December 31, 2004 ***************** 1,858 $20 $5,902 $16,758 $(3,125) $ (16) $19,539 Net income ************************************** Unrealized loss on securities available for sale ******** Unrealized loss on derivatives ********************** Foreign currency translation adjustment ************** Realized loss on derivatives ************************ Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for losses realized in net income ************************************** Minimum pension liability adjustment **************** Income taxes ************************************ Total comprehensive income ***************** Cash dividends declared on common stock ********** Issuance of common and treasury stock ************* Purchase of treasury stock************************* Stock option and restricted stock grants ************* Shares reserved to meet deferred compensation obligations************************************ 4,489 (2,246) 19 (62) (81) 84 2 525 (1,807) (6) (539) (58) 3 (74) 39 (38) 254 4,489 (539) (58) 3 (74) 39 (38) 254 4,076 (2,246) 444 (1,807) 84 (4) Balance December 31, 2005 ***************** 1,815 $20 $5,907 $19,001 $(4,413) $ (429) $20,086 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 64 U.S. BANCORP U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 Operating Activities Net income*************************************************************************** Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities $ 4,489 $ 4,167 $ 3,733 Provision for credit losses *********************************************************** Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment ******************************* Amortization of intangibles ********************************************************** Provision for deferred income taxes*************************************************** (Gain) loss on sales of securities and other assets, net ********************************** Mortgage loans originated for sale in the secondary market, net of repayments************* Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans *********************************************** Stock-based compensation ********************************************************* Other, net************************************************************************* 666 231 458 (301) (316) (19,245) 18,616 83 (1,269) Net cash provided by operating activities******************************************* 3,412 Investing Activities Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investment securities ****************************** Proceeds from maturities of investment securities****************************************** Purchases of investment securities ****************************************************** Net (increase) decrease in loans outstanding ********************************************** Proceeds from sales of loans *********************************************************** Purchases of loans ******************************************************************** Acquisitions, net of cash acquired ******************************************************* Divestitures *************************************************************************** Other, net **************************************************************************** 5,039 10,264 (13,148) (9,904) 1,711 (3,568) (1,008) — (1,159) Net cash used in investing activities *********************************************** (11,773) Financing Activities Net increase (decrease) in deposits ****************************************************** Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings ****************************************** Principal payments or redemption of long-term debt *************************************** Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt************************************************ Proceeds from issuance of common stock *********************************************** Repurchase of common stock ********************************************************** Cash dividends paid ******************************************************************* 3,968 7,116 (12,848) 15,519 371 (1,855) (2,245) Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities ******************************************* 10,026 Change in cash and cash equivalents ********************************************* Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ******************************************* 1,665 6,537 669 244 550 281 (104) (16,007) 15,778 139 (492) 5,225 8,216 12,261 (19,624) (7,680) 1,804 (2,719) (322) — (451) (8,515) 1,689 2,234 (12,683) 13,704 581 (2,660) (1,820) 1,045 (2,245) 8,782 1,254 275 682 273 (300) (27,666) 30,228 123 80 8,682 17,383 18,140 (51,127) (4,193) 2,204 (944) — (382) (506) (19,425) 3,449 3,869 (8,968) 11,468 398 (326) (1,557) 8,333 (2,410) 11,192 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year****************************************** $ 8,202 $ 6,537 $ 8,782 Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures Cash paid for income taxes ************************************************************ Cash paid for interest ****************************************************************** Net noncash transfers to foreclosed property ********************************************* Acquisitions $ 2,131 3,365 98 Assets acquired ******************************************************************* Liabilities assumed ***************************************************************** $ 1,545 (393) Net *************************************************************************** $ 1,152 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. $ 1,768 2,030 104 $ $ 437 (114) 323 $ 1,258 2,077 110 $ $ — — — U.S. BANCORP 65 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 S I G N I F I C A N T A C C O U N T I N G P O L I C I E S U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) is a multi-state ﬁnancial services holding company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Company provides a full range of ﬁnancial services including lending and depository services through banking ofﬁces principally in 24 states. The Company also engages in credit card, merchant, and ATM processing, mortgage banking, insurance, trust and investment management, brokerage, and leasing activities principally in domestic markets. Basis of Presentation The consolidated ﬁnancial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The consolidation eliminates all signiﬁcant intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain items in prior periods have been reclassiﬁed to conform to the current presentation. Uses of Estimates The preparation of ﬁnancial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the ﬁnancial statements and accompanying notes. Actual experience could differ from those estimates. B U S I N E S S S E G M E N T S Within the Company, ﬁnancial performance is measured by major lines of business based on the products and services provided to customers through its distribution channels. The Company has ﬁve reportable operating segments: Payment Services includes consumer and business credit cards, debit cards, corporate and purchasing card services, consumer lines of credit, ATM processing and merchant processing. Customized products and services, coupled with cutting-edge technology are provided to consumer and business customers, government clients, correspondent ﬁnancial institutions, merchants and co-brand partners. Treasury and Corporate Support includes the Company’s investment portfolios, funding, capital management and asset securitization activities, interest rate risk management, the net effect of transfer pricing related to average balances and the residual aggregate of expenses associated with corporate activities managed on a consolidated basis, including enterprise-wide operations and administrative support functions. Segment Results Accounting policies for the lines of business are the same as those used in preparation of the consolidated ﬁnancial statements with respect to activities speciﬁcally attributable to each business line. However, the preparation of business line results requires management to establish methodologies to allocate funding costs and beneﬁts, expenses and other ﬁnancial elements to each line of business. For details of these methodologies and segment results, see ‘‘Basis of Presentation’’ and Table 23 ‘‘Line of Business Financial Performance’’ included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. S E C U R I T I E S Wholesale Banking offers lending, depository, treasury management and other ﬁnancial services to middle market, large corporate and public sector clients. Realized gains or losses on securities are determined on a trade date basis based on the speciﬁc carrying value of the investments being sold. Consumer Banking delivers products and services through banking ofﬁces, telephone servicing and sales, on-line services, direct mail and automated teller machines (‘‘ATMs’’). It encompasses community banking, metropolitan banking, in-store banking, small business banking, including lending guaranteed by the Small Business Administration, small-ticket leasing, consumer lending, mortgage banking, consumer ﬁnance, workplace banking, student banking, 24-hour banking and investment product and insurance sales. Private Client, Trust and Asset Management provides trust, private banking, ﬁnancial advisory, investment management and mutual fund servicing to afﬂuent individuals, businesses, institutions and mutual funds. 66 U.S. BANCORP Trading Securities Debt and equity securities held for resale are classiﬁed as trading securities and reported at fair value. Realized gains or losses are reported in noninterest income. Available-for-sale Securities These securities are not trading securities but may be sold before maturity in response to changes in the Company’s interest rate risk proﬁle, funding needs or demand for collateralized deposits by public entities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains or losses reported within other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. When sold, the amortized cost of the speciﬁc securities is used to compute the gain or loss. Declines in fair value that are deemed other-than-temporary, if any, are reported in noninterest income. Held-to-maturity Securities Debt securities for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Declines in fair value that are deemed other than temporary, if any, are reported in noninterest income. Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally accounted for as collateralized ﬁnancing transactions and are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired or sold, plus accrued interest. The fair value of collateral received is continually monitored and additional collateral obtained or requested to be returned to the Company as deemed appropriate. EQUITY INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING ENTITIES Equity investments in public entities in which ownership is less than 20 percent are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and carried at fair value. Similar investments in private entities are accounted for using the cost method. Investments in entities where ownership interest is between 20 percent and 50 percent are accounted for using the equity method with the exception of limited partnerships and limited liability companies where an ownership interest of greater than 5 percent requires the use of the equity method. If the Company has a voting interest greater than 50 percent, the consolidation method is used. All equity investments are evaluated for impairment at least annually and more frequently if certain criteria are met. L O A N S Loans are reported net of unearned income. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balances as earned. Loan and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan and/or commitment period as yield adjustments. Commitments to Extend Credit Unfunded residential mortgage loan commitments entered into in connection with mortgage banking activities are considered derivatives and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in income. All other unfunded loan commitments are generally related to providing credit facilities to customers of the bank and are not actively traded ﬁnancial instruments. These unfunded commitments are disclosed as off-balance sheet ﬁnancial instruments in Note 23 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Allowance for Credit Losses Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on evaluations of credit relationships, the loan portfolio, recent loss experience, and other pertinent factors, including economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates, including amounts of future cash collections expected on nonaccrual loans, which may be susceptible to signiﬁcant change. The allowance for credit losses relating to impaired loans is based on the loan’s observable market price, the collateral for certain collateral-dependent loans, or the discounted cash ﬂows using the loan’s effective interest rate. The Company determines the amount of the allowance required for certain sectors based on relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The allowance recorded for commercial loans is based on quarterly reviews of individual credit relationships and an analysis of the migration of commercial loans and actual loss experience. The allowance recorded for homogeneous consumer loans is based on an analysis of product mix, risk characteristics of the portfolio, bankruptcy experiences, and historical losses, adjusted for current trends, for each homogenous category or group of loans. The allowance is increased through provisions charged to operating earnings and reduced by net charge-offs. The Company also assesses the credit risk associated with off-balance sheet loan commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives and determines the appropriate amount of credit loss liability that should be recorded. The liability for off-balance sheet credit exposure related to loan commitments and other ﬁnancial instruments is included in other liabilities. Nonaccrual Loans Generally commercial loans (including impaired loans) are placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of interest or principal has become 90 days past due or is otherwise considered doubtful. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Future interest payments are generally applied against principal. Revolving consumer lines and credit cards are charged off by 180 days past due and closed-end consumer loans other than loans secured by 1-4 family properties are charged off at 120 days past due and are, therefore, generally not placed on nonaccrual status. Certain retail customers having ﬁnancial difﬁculties may have the terms of their credit card and other loan agreements modiﬁed to require only principal payments and, as such, are reported as nonaccrual. Impaired Loans A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Restructured Loans In cases where a borrower experiences ﬁnancial difﬁculties and the Company makes certain concessionary modiﬁcations to contractual terms, the loan is classiﬁed as a restructured loan. Loans restructured at a rate U.S. BANCORP 67 equal to or greater than that of a new loan with comparable risk at the time the contract is modiﬁed may be excluded from restructured loans in the calendar years subsequent to the restructuring if they are in compliance with the modiﬁed terms. Generally, a nonaccrual loan that is restructured remains on nonaccrual for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower can meet the restructured terms. However, performance prior to the restructuring, or signiﬁcant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of restructuring or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan remains classiﬁed as a nonaccrual loan. Leases The Company engages in both direct and leveraged lease ﬁnancing. The net investment in direct ﬁnancing leases is the sum of all minimum lease payments and estimated residual values, less unearned income. Unearned income is added to interest income over the terms of the leases to produce a level yield. The investment in leveraged leases is the sum of all lease payments (less nonrecourse debt payments) plus estimated residual values, less unearned income. Income from leveraged leases is recognized over the term of the leases based on the unrecovered equity investment. Residual values on leased assets are reviewed regularly for other-than-temporary impairment. Residual valuations for retail automobile leases are based on independent assessments of expected used car sale prices at the end-of- term. Impairment tests are conducted based on these valuations considering the probability of the lessee returning the asset to the Company, re-marketing efforts, insurance coverage and ancillary fees and costs. Valuations for commercial leases are based upon external or internal management appraisals. When there is other than temporary impairment in the estimated fair value of the Company’s interest in the residual value of a leased asset, the carrying value is reduced to the estimated fair value with the writedown recognized in the current period. Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale (‘‘LHFS’’) represent mortgage loan originations intended to be sold in the secondary market and other loans that management has an active plan to sell. LHFS are carried at the lower of cost or market value as determined on an aggregate basis by type of loan. In the event management decides to sell loans receivable, the loans are transferred at the lower of cost or fair value. Loans transferred to LHFS are marked-to-market (‘‘MTM’’) at the time of transfer. MTM losses related to the sale/transfer of non-homogeneous loans that are predominantly credit-related are reﬂected in charge-offs. 68 U.S. BANCORP With respect to homogeneous loans, the amount of ‘‘probable’’ credit loss determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, ‘‘Accounting for Contingencies,’’ methodologies utilized to determine the speciﬁc allowance allocation for the portfolio is also included in charge-offs. Any incremental loss determined in accordance with MTM accounting, that includes consideration of other factors such as estimates of inherent losses, is reported separately from charge-offs as a reduction to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent decreases in fair value are recognized in noninterest income. Other Real Estate Other real estate (‘‘ORE’’), which is included in other assets, is property acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings. ORE is carried at fair value, less estimated selling costs. The property is evaluated regularly and any decreases in the carrying amount are included in noninterest expense. D E R I VAT I V E F I N A N C I A L I N S T R U M E N T S In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, foreign currency and prepayment risk and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers. All derivative instruments are recorded as either other assets, other liabilities or short-term borrowings at fair value. Subsequent changes in a derivative’s fair value are recognized currently in earnings unless speciﬁc hedge accounting criteria are met. All derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value and classiﬁed either as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (‘‘fair value’’ hedge) or as a hedge of the variability of cash ﬂows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability or a forecasted transaction (‘‘cash ﬂow’’ hedge). Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a fair value hedge and the offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item are recorded in income. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a cash ﬂow hedge are recognized in other comprehensive income until income from the cash ﬂows of the hedged item is recognized. The Company performs an assessment, both at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis thereafter, when required, to determine whether these derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Any change in fair value resulting from hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recorded in noninterest income. If a derivative designated as a hedge is terminated or ceases to be highly effective, the gain or loss is amortized to earnings over the remaining life of the hedged asset or liability (fair value hedge) or over the same period(s) that the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings (cash ﬂow hedge). If the hedged item is disposed of, or the forecasted transaction is no longer probable, the derivative is recorded at fair value with any resulting gain or loss included in the gain or loss from the disposition of the hedged item or, in the case of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable, included in earnings immediately. O T H E R S I G N I F I C A N T P O L I C I E S Intangible Assets The price paid over the net fair value of acquired businesses (‘‘goodwill’’) is not amortized. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, using straight-line and accelerated methods. The recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets is evaluated annually, at a minimum, or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The evaluation includes assessing the estimated fair value of the intangible asset based on market prices for similar assets, where available, and the present value of the estimated future cash ﬂows associated with the intangible asset. Income Taxes Deferred taxes are recorded to reﬂect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the ﬁnancial reporting amounts at each year-end. Mortgage Servicing Rights Mortgage servicing rights (‘‘MSRs’’) are capitalized as separate assets when loans are sold and servicing is retained. The total cost of loans sold is allocated between the loans sold and the servicing assets retained based on their relative fair values. MSRs that are purchased from others are initially recorded at cost. The carrying value of the MSRs is amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue and recorded in noninterest expense as amortization of intangible assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically reviewed for impairment using a lower of carrying value or fair value methodology. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are stratiﬁed based on the underlying loan type and note rate and the carrying value of each stratum is compared to fair value based on a discounted cash ﬂow analysis, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Events that may signiﬁcantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. If the carrying value is greater than fair value, impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for each impaired stratum and recorded as amortization of intangible assets. The valuation allowance is adjusted each subsequent period to reﬂect any increase or decrease in the indicated impairment. The Company reviews mortgage servicing rights for other-than-temporary impairment each quarter and recognizes a direct write-down when the recoverability of a recorded valuation allowance is determined to be remote. In determining whether other- than-temporary impairment has taken place, the Company considers historical trends in pay off activity and the potential for impairment recovery. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights, precluding subsequent reversals. Pensions For purposes of its retirement plans, the Company utilizes a measurement date of September 30. At the measurement date, plan assets are determined based on fair value, generally representing observable market prices. The actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related expense is the projected unit credit method. The projected beneﬁt obligation is principally determined based on the present value of projected beneﬁt distributions at an assumed discount rate. The discount rate utilized is based on match-funding maturities and interest payments of high quality corporate bonds available in the market place to projected cash ﬂows as of the measurement date for future beneﬁt payments. Periodic pension expense (or credits) includes service costs, interest costs based on the assumed discount rate, the expected return on plan assets based on an actuarially derived market-related value and amortization of actuarial gains and losses. Pension accounting reﬂects the long-term nature of beneﬁt obligations and the investment horizon of plan assets and can have the effect of reducing earnings volatility related to short-term changes in interest rates and market valuations. Actuarial gains and losses include the impact of plan amendments and various unrecognized gains and losses which are deferred and amortized over the future service periods of active employees. The market-related value utilized to determine the expected return on plan assets is based on fair value adjusted for the difference between expected returns and actual performance of plan assets. The unrealized difference between actual experience and expected returns is included in the market-related value ratably over a ﬁve-year period. Premises and Equipment Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and depreciated primarily on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the assets. Estimated useful lives range up to 40 years for newly constructed buildings and from 3 to 20 years for furniture and equipment. Capitalized leases, less accumulated amortization, are included in premises and equipment. The lease obligations are included in long-term debt. Capitalized leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and the amortization is included in depreciation expense. Statement of Cash Flows For purposes of reporting cash ﬂows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and money U.S. BANCORP 69 market investments, deﬁned as interest-bearing amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell. Stock-Based Compensation The Company grants stock- based awards including restricted stock and options to purchase common stock of the Company. Stock option grants are for a ﬁxed number of shares to employees and directors with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation in its results of operations utilizing the fair value method under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-based Compensation’’ (‘‘SFAS 123’’). Stock-based compensation is recognized using an accelerated method of amortization for awards with graded vesting features and on a straight-line basis for awards with cliff vesting. The Company recognizes compensation cost over the normal vesting period for awards subject to continued vesting upon the employee’s retirement. The amortization of stock-based compensation reﬂects estimated forfeitures adjusted for actual forfeiture experience. As compensation expense is recognized, a deferred tax asset is recorded that represents an estimate of the future tax deduction from exercise or release of restrictions. At the time stock-based awards are exercised, cancelled, expire, or restrictions are released, the Company may be required to recognize an adjustment to tax expense. Per Share Calculations Earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting income and outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, using the treasury stock method. All per share amounts have been restated for stock splits. Note 2 A C C O U N T I N G C H A N G E S Stock-Based Compensation In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (‘‘SFAS 123R’’), ‘‘Share-Based Payment’’, a revision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (‘‘SFAS 123’’), ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.’’ SFAS 123R requires companies to measure the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. This statement eliminates the use of the alternative intrinsic value method of accounting that was allowed when SFAS 123 was originally issued. The provisions of this statement are effective for the Company on January 1, 2006. Because the Company retroactively adopted the fair value method in 2003, the impact of expensing stock-based awards is already recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company plans to change from an accelerated to a straight-line method of expense attribution effective January 1, 2006, for new stock-based awards. The impact of changing from accelerated to straight-line amortization for new awards will reduce expenses by approximately $33 million ($20 million after tax) in 2006. Loan Commitments On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105 (‘‘SAB 105’’), ‘‘Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,’’ which provides guidance regarding loan commitments accounted for as derivative instruments and is effective for commitments entered into after March 31, 2004. The guidance clariﬁes that expected future cash ﬂows related to the servicing of the loan may be recognized only when the servicing asset has been contractually separated from the underlying loan by sale with servicing retained. The adoption of SAB 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s ﬁnancial statements. Note 3 B U S I N E S S C O M B I N AT I O N S On December 30, 2005, the Company acquired the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses of Wachovia Corporation in a cash transaction valued at $720 million initially with an additional $80 million payable in one year based on business retention levels. As a result of this transaction, the Company acquired approximately 14,100 new Corporate Trust client issuances with $410 billion in assets under administration and approximately 1,700 new Institutional Trust and Custody clients with $570 billion in assets under administration. The transaction represented total assets acquired of $730 million and liabilities assumed of $10 million at the closing date. Included in total assets were contract and other intangibles with an estimated fair value of $227 million and goodwill of $500 million. The goodwill reﬂected the strategic value of the combined organization’s leadership position in the corporate trust and institutional custody businesses and economies of scale resulting from the transaction. In addition to this acquisition the Company completed other smaller acquisitions to enhance its presence in certain markets and businesses. 70 U.S. BANCORP Note 4 D I S C O N T I N U E D O P E R AT I O N S On December 31, 2003, the Company completed the distribution of all the outstanding shares of common stock of Piper Jaffray Companies to its shareholders. This non- cash distribution was tax-free to the Company, its shareholders and Piper Jaffray Companies. In connection with the December 31, 2003, distribution, the results of Piper Jaffray Companies are reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income separately as discontinued operations. The following table represents the condensed results of operations for discontinued operations: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Revenue ********************************************************************************************************************* Noninterest expense *********************************************************************************************************** Income from discontinued operations ******************************************************************************************** Costs of disposal (a) *********************************************************************************************************** Income taxes ***************************************************************************************************************** Discontinued operations, net of tax ******************************************************************************************* $ (a) The $27 million of disposal costs related to discontinued operations primarily represents legal, investment banking and other costs directly related to the distribution. 2003 $ 783 716 67 27 17 23 The distribution was treated as a dividend to shareholders for accounting purposes and, as such, reduced the Company’s retained earnings by $685 million. Following the distribution, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, USB Holdings, Inc. holds a $180 million subordinated debt facility with Piper Jaffray & Co., a broker-dealer subsidiary of Piper Jaffray Companies. In addition, the Company provides an indemniﬁcation in an amount up to $18 million with respect to certain speciﬁed liabilities resulting from third-party claims relating to research analyst independence and from certain regulatory investigations, as deﬁned in the separation and distribution agreement entered into with Piper Jaffray Companies at the time of the distribution. Through December 31, 2005, the Company has paid approximately $4 million to Piper Jaffray Companies under this indemniﬁcation agreement. Note 5 R E S T R I C T I O N S O N C A S H A N D D U E F R O M B A N K S Bank subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The amount of those reserve balances was approximately $164 million at December 31, 2005. Note 6 I N V E S T M E N T S E C U R I T I E S The detail of the amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities at December 31 was as follows: (Dollars in Millions) Held-to-maturity (a) 2005 2004 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Mortgage-backed securities ******************* Obligations of state and political subdivisions **** Other debt securities ************************* $ 8 84 17 Total held-to-maturity securities ************* $ 109 Available-for-sale (b) U.S. Treasury and agencies******************** Mortgage-backed securities ******************* Asset-backed securities *********************** Obligations of state and political subdivisions **** Other securities and investments *************** $ 496 38,161 12 640 1,012 Total available-for-sale securities ************ $40,321 $ — 5 — $ 5 $ 2 86 — 3 2 $93 $ — $ (1) — 8 88 17 $ 11 98 18 $ (1) $ 113 $ 127 $ (9) (733) — (6) (7) $ 489 37,514 12 637 1,007 $ 684 39,809 64 205 863 $(755) $39,659 $41,625 $ — 7 — $ 7 $ 3 65 — 6 11 $85 (a) Held-to-maturity securities are carried at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. (b) Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized net gains or losses reported within other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. $ — $ (2) — 11 103 18 $ (2) $ 132 $ (8) (337) — — (11) $ 679 39,537 64 211 863 $(356) $41,354 U.S. BANCORP 71 The fair value of available-for-sale securities shown above includes securities totaling $11.3 billion with unrealized losses of $380 million which had been in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months at December 31, 2005, compared with securities totaling $4.8 billion with unrealized losses of $149 million which had been in a loss position of greater than 12 months at December 31, 2004. All other available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses have an aggregate fair value of $21.7 billion and have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and represent both ﬁxed-rate securities and adjustable-rate securities with temporary impairment resulting from increases in interest rates since the purchase of the securities. All principal and interest payments on available-for-sale debt securities are expected to be collected given the high credit quality of the U.S. government agency debt securities and bank holding company issuers. As of December 31, 2005, the Company has the ability and intent to hold investment securities until their anticipated recovery in value or maturity. The weighted-average maturity of the available-for-sale investment securities was 6.10 years at December 31, 2005, compared with 4.45 years at December 31, 2004. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 4.89 percent and 4.43 percent, respectively. The weighted-average maturity of the held-to-maturity investment securities was 7.21 years at December 31, 2005, compared with 6.19 years at December 31, 2004. The corresponding weighted-average yields were 6.44 percent and 6.28 percent, respectively. Securities carried at $36.9 billion at December 31, 2005, and $28.0 billion at December 31, 2004, were pledged to secure public, private and trust deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes required by law. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase where the buyer/lender has the right to sell or pledge the securities, were $10.9 billion at December 31, 2005, and $4.8 billion at December 31, 2004, respectively. The following table provides information as to the amount of interest income from taxable and non-taxable investment securities: (Dollars in Millions) Taxable ************************************************************************************** Non-taxable ********************************************************************************** 2005 $1,938 16 Total interest income from investment securities ************************************************ $1,954 2004 $1,809 18 $1,827 2003 $1,655 29 $1,684 The following table provides information as to the amount of gross gains and losses realized through the sales of available-for- sale investment securities: (Dollars in Millions) Realized gains ********************************************************************************* Realized losses ******************************************************************************** 2005 $ 13 (119) Net realized gains (losses) ******************************************************************** $(106) Income tax (beneﬁt) on realized gains (losses) ****************************************************** $ (40) 2004 $ 104 (209) $(105) $ (40) 2003 $364 (119) $245 $ 93 For amortized cost, fair value and yield by maturity date of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities outstanding at December 31, 2005, refer to Table 11 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 72 U.S. BANCORP Note 7 L O A N S A N D A L L O WA N C E F O R C R E D I T L O S S E S The composition of the loan portfolio at December 31 was as follows: (Dollars in millions) Commercial 2005 2004 Commercial ********************************************************************************************* Lease ﬁnancing****************************************************************************************** $ 37,844 5,098 Total commercial ************************************************************************************* 42,942 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *********************************************************************************** Construction and development **************************************************************************** Total commercial real estate**************************************************************************** Residential mortgages ********************************************************************************** Retail Credit card********************************************************************************************** Retail leasing ******************************************************************************************** Home equity and second mortgages *********************************************************************** Other retail Revolving credit ************************************************************************************** Installment ******************************************************************************************* Automobile ****************************************************************************************** Student ********************************************************************************************* Total other retail *********************************************************************************** Total retail ******************************************************************************************* 20,272 8,191 28,463 20,730 7,137 7,338 14,979 2,504 3,582 8,112 2,019 16,217 45,671 $ 35,210 4,963 40,173 20,315 7,270 27,585 15,367 6,603 7,166 14,851 2,541 2,767 7,419 1,843 14,570 43,190 Total loans**************************************************************************************** $137,806 $126,315 Loans are presented net of unearned interest and deferred fees and costs, which amounted to $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company had loans of $44.1 billion at December 31, 2005, and $38.3 billion at December 31, 2004, pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank. Loans of $18.1 billion at December 31, 2005, and $10.3 billion at December 31, 2004, were pledged at the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company primarily lends to borrowers in the 24 states in which it has banking ofﬁces. Collateral for commercial loans may include marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. For details of the Company’s commercial portfolio by industry group and geography as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, see Table 7 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For detail of the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio by property type and geography as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, see Table 8 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Such loans are collateralized by the related property. Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans not performing in accordance with modiﬁed terms, other real estate and other nonperforming assets owned by the Company. For details of the Company’s nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, see Table 14 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table lists information related to nonperforming loans as of December 31: (Dollars in Millions) Loans on nonaccrual status ***************************************************************************************** Restructured loans ************************************************************************************************* Total nonperforming loans ******************************************************************************************* Interest income that would have been recognized at original contractual terms ********************************************* Amount recognized as interest income ******************************************************************************** Forgone revenue *************************************************************************************************** 2005 $469 75 $544 $ 48 18 $ 30 2004 $582 58 $640 $ 64 22 $ 42 U.S. BANCORP 73 Activity in the allowance for credit losses was as follows: (Dollars in Millions) Balance at beginning of year******************************************************************** Add Provision charged to operating expense******************************************************* Deduct Loans charged off************************************************************************** Less recoveries of loans charged off ********************************************************** Net loans charged off*********************************************************************** Acquisitions and other changes ***************************************************************** 2005 $2,269 666 949 264 685 1 2004 $2,369 669 1,074 307 767 (2) 2003 $2,422 1,254 1,494 242 1,252 (55) Balance at end of year (a) ********************************************************************** $2,251 $2,269 $2,369 Components Allowance for loan losses ******************************************************************* Liability for unfunded credit commitments ***************************************************** $2,041 210 Total allowance for credit losses ********************************************************** $2,251 $2,080 189 $2,269 $2,184 185 $2,369 (a) Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s liability for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. A portion of the allowance for credit losses is allocated to commercial and commercial real estate loans deemed impaired. These impaired loans are included in nonperforming assets. A summary of impaired loans and their related allowance for credit losses is as follows: (Dollars in Millions) Impaired loans 2005 2004 2003 Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment Valuation Allowance Valuation allowance required*************** No valuation allowance required************ Total impaired loans ************************* $388 — $388 Average balance of impaired loans during the year ************************************ $412 Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the year ************************** 2 $37 — $37 $489 — $489 $600 1 $64 — $64 $841 — $841 $970 — $108 — $108 Commitments to lend additional funds to customers whose commercial or commercial real estate loans were classiﬁed as nonaccrual or restructured at December 31, 2005, totaled $35 million. At December 31, 2005, there were $1 million of these loans that were restructured at market interest rates and returned to an accruing status. In addition to impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans, the Company had smaller balance homogenous loans that are accruing interest at rates considered to be below market rate. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the recorded investment in these other Note 8 L E A S E S restructured loans was $315 million and $227 million, respectively, with average balances of $278 million during 2005 and $229 million during 2004. The Company recognized estimated interest income on these loans of $20 million $17 million during 2005 and 2004 respectively. Included in noninterest income, primarily in mortgage banking revenue, for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company had net gains on the sale of loans of $175 million, $171 million and $163 million, respectively. The components of the net investment in sales-type and direct ﬁnancing leases at December 31 were as follows: (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 Aggregate future minimum lease payments to be received ********************************************************* Unguaranteed residual values accruing to the lessor’s beneﬁt ****************************************************** Unearned income ******************************************************************************************** Initial direct costs ******************************************************************************************** $13,023 392 (1,556) 268 Total net investment in sales-type and direct ﬁnancing leases(a) ************************************************* $12,127 $12,436 615 (1,560) 264 $11,755 (a) The accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimum lease payments was $112 million and $141 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 74 U.S. BANCORP The minimum future lease payments to be received from sales-type and direct ﬁnancing leases were as follows at December 31, 2005: (Dollars in Millions) 2006 ************************************************************************************************************************ 2007 ************************************************************************************************************************ 2008 ************************************************************************************************************************ 2009 ************************************************************************************************************************ 2010 ************************************************************************************************************************ Thereafter ******************************************************************************************************************** $2,489 3,084 3,844 2,319 1,067 220 Note 9 A C C O U N T I N G F O R T R A N S F E R S A N D S E RV I C I N G O F F I N A N C I A L A S S E T S A N D E X T I N G U I S H M E N T S O F L I A B I L I T I E S F i n a n c i a l A s s e t S a l e s When the Company sells ﬁnancial assets, it may retain interest-only strips, servicing rights, residual rights to a cash reserve account, and/or other retained interests in the sold ﬁnancial assets. The gain or loss on sale depends in part on the previous carrying amount of the ﬁnancial assets involved in the transfer and is allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests based on their relative fair values at the date of transfer. Quoted market prices are used to determine retained interest fair values when readily available. Since quotes are generally not available for retained interests, the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of future expected cash ﬂows using management’s best estimates of the key assumptions including credit losses, prepayment speeds, forward yield curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. Retained interests and liabilities are recorded at fair value using a discounted cash ﬂow methodology at inception and are evaluated at least quarterly thereafter. Conduits and Securitization The Company sponsors an off- balance sheet conduit, a qualiﬁed special purpose entity (‘‘QSPE’’), to which it transferred high-grade investment securities, funded by the issuance of commercial paper. Because QSPE’s are exempt from consolidation under the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. 46, ‘‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (‘‘FIN 46’’), the Company does not consolidate the conduit structure in its ﬁnancial statements. The conduit held assets of $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005, and $5.7 billion at December 31, 2004. These investment securities include primarily (i) private label asset-backed securities, which are insurance ‘‘wrapped’’ by AAA/Aaa-rated monoline insurance companies and (ii) government agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The conduit had commercial paper liabilities of $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005, and $5.7 billion at December 31, 2004. The Company beneﬁts by transferring the investment securities into a conduit that provides diversiﬁcation of funding sources in a capital-efﬁcient manner and the generation of income. The Company provides a liquidity facility to the conduit. Utilization of the liquidity facility would be triggered if the conduit is unable to, or does not, issue commercial paper to fund its assets. A liability for the estimate of the potential risk of loss the Company has as the liquidity facility provider is recorded on the balance sheet in other liabilities. The liability is adjusted downward over time as the underlying assets pay down with the offset recognized as other noninterest income. The liability for the liquidity facility was $20 million at December 31, 2005, and $32 million at December 31, 2004. In addition, the Company recorded at fair value its retained residual interest in the investment securities conduit of $28 million at December 31, 2005, and $57 million at December 31, 2004. The Company recorded $17 million from the conduit during 2005 and $25 million during 2004, for revenues related to the conduit including fees for servicing, management, administration and accretion income from retained interests. U.S. BANCORP 75 Sensitivity Analysis At December 31, 2005, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash ﬂows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions for the investment securities conduit were as follows: December 31, 2005 (Dollars in Millions) Current economic assumptions sensitivity analysis Carrying value (fair value) of residual interest ********************************************************************************* Weighted average life (in years) ******************************************************************************************** Expected remaining life (in years)*************************************************************************************** Impact of 10% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Impact of 20% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Expected credit losses (annual) (a) ************************************************************************************** Impact of 10% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Impact of 20% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Residual cash ﬂow discount rate *************************************************************************************** Impact of 10% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Impact of 20% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Interest rate on variable rate bonds (b) ********************************************************************************* Impact of 10% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** Impact of 20% adverse change ******************************************************************************************** $27.9 1.6 2.7 $ (2.8) (5.1) NA $ — — 6.2% $ (.2) (.4) NA $ — — (a) Credit losses are zero as the investments are all AAA/Aaa rated or insured investments. (b) The investment securities conduit is mostly match funded. Therefore, interest rate movements create no material impact to the value of the residual interest. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. Cash Flow Information The table below summarizes certain cash ﬂows received from and paid to conduit or structured entities: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 Proceeds from Collections used by trust to purchase new receivables in revolving securitizations ************************** Servicing and other fees received and cash ﬂows on retained interests*************************************** 2004 Proceeds from Collections used by trust to purchase new receivables in revolving securitizations ************************** Servicing and other fees received and cash ﬂows on retained interests*************************************** (a) The small business credit securitization was a revolving transaction where proceeds were reinvested until their legal terminations. Unsecured Small Business Receivables (a) Investment Securities $ 50 62 $329 74 $ — 22 $ — 35 76 U.S. BANCORP Other Information Quantitative information related to managed assets and loan sales was as follows: Asset Type (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004 At December 31 Year Ended December 31 Total Principal Balance Principal Amount 90 Days or More Past Due (a) Average Balance Net Credit Losses Commercial Commercial ************************* Lease ﬁnancing ********************** $ 38,075 5,098 $ 35,891 4,963 Total commercial ***************** 43,173 40,854 Commercial real estate Commercial mortgages *************** Construction and development ******** 20,272 8,191 20,315 7,270 Total commercial real estate ******** 28,463 27,585 Residential mortgages ************** 20,730 15,367 Retail Credit card************************** Retail leasing ************************ Other retail ************************** 7,137 7,338 31,196 6,603 7,166 29,421 Total retail *********************** 45,671 43,190 Total managed loans *********** 138,037 126,996 Investment securities *************** 43,517 47,191 $254 42 296 134 23 157 115 139 3 87 229 797 — $311 92 403 $ 38,207 4,923 $ 35,274 4,866 43,130 40,140 $ 58 42 100 $129 69 198 175 26 201 114 115 6 101 222 940 — 20,268 7,696 20,386 6,881 27,964 27,267 18,036 14,322 6,615 7,346 30,503 6,090 6,653 28,461 44,464 41,204 133,594 122,933 46,740 49,452 6 (3) 3 36 278 26 255 559 698 — 18 9 27 29 252 39 251 542 796 — Total managed assets **************** $181,554 $174,187 $797 $940 $180,334 $172,385 $698 $796 Less Assets sold or securitized ************* 3,980 6,391 Total assets held ************** $177,574 $167,796 Sold or securitized assets 5,126 7,235 $175,208 $165,150 Guaranteed SBA loans (b) ************ Small business credit lines (b) ********* Investment securities ***************** $ 231 — 3,749 $ 315 366 5,710 Total securitized assets ************ $ 3,980 $ 6,391 $ — — — $ — $ — 4 — $ 4 $ 274 215 4,637 $ 364 428 6,443 $ 5,126 $ 7,235 $ — 13 — $ 13 $ — 29 — $ 29 (a) Includes nonaccrual (b) Reported in ‘‘commercial’’ loans Note 10 P R E M I S E S A N D E Q U I P M E N T Premises and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following: (Dollars in Millions) Land***************************************************************************************************** Buildings and improvements ******************************************************************************** Furniture, ﬁxtures and equipment **************************************************************************** Capitalized building and equipment leases ******************************************************************** Construction in progress************************************************************************************ Less accumulated depreciation and amortization*************************************************************** 2005 $ 315 2,313 2,239 136 4 5,007 (3,166) Total************************************************************************************************** $ 1,841 2004 $ 311 2,288 2,105 138 5 4,847 (2,957) $ 1,890 U.S. BANCORP 77 Note 11 M O RT G A G E S E RV I C I N G R I G H T S The Company’s portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others was $69.0 billion, $63.2 billion and $53.9 billion at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively. Changes in the valuation allowance for capitalized mortgage servicing rights are summarized as follows: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Balance at beginning of year ****************************************************************** Additions charged (reductions credited) to operations****************************************** Direct write-downs charged against the allowance ******************************************** Balance at end of year *********************************************************************** 2005 $172 (53) (49) $ 70 Changes in net carrying value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights are summarized as follows: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Balance at beginning of year **************************************************************** Rights purchased *********************************************************************** Rights capitalized *********************************************************************** Amortization *************************************************************************** Reparation (impairment)****************************************************************** Balance at end of year********************************************************************** Impairment valuation allowance *********************************************************** 2005 $ 866 27 369 (197) 53 1,118 70 2004 $160 57 (45) $172 2004 $ 670 139 300 (186) (57) 866 172 Initial carrying value, net of amortization ******************************************************* $1,188 $1,038 2003 $ 207 209 (256) $ 160 2003 $642 55 338 (156) (209) 670 160 $830 The key economic assumptions used to estimate the value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio were as follows: December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Fair value ********************************************************************************* Expected weighted-average life (in years) ****************************************************** Discount rate ****************************************************************************** 2005 $1,123 6.8 10.2% 2004 $872 5.5 9.9% 2003 $670 5.2 9.9% The estimated sensitivity of the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio to changes in interest rates at December 31, 2005, was as follows: (Dollars in Millions) Down Scenario Up Scenario 50 bps 25 bps 25 bps 50 bps Fair value************************************************************************************** $(109) $ (47) $ 32 $ 58 The fair value of mortgage servicing rights and its sensitivity to changes in interest rates is inﬂuenced by the mix of the servicing portfolio and characteristics of each segment of the portfolio. The Company’s servicing portfolio consists of the distinct portfolios of Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs (‘‘MRBP’’), government-insured mortgages and conventional mortgages. The MRBP division specializes in servicing loans made under state and local housing authority programs. These programs provide mortgages to low- and moderate-income borrowers and are generally government-insured programs with a favorable rate subsidy, down payment and/or closing cost assistance. Mortgage loans originated as part of government agency and state loan programs tend to experience slower prepayment speeds and better cash ﬂows than conventional mortgage loans. The servicing portfolios are predominantly comprised of ﬁxed-rate agency loans (FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA, FHLB and various housing agencies) with limited adjustable-rate or jumbo mortgage loans. 78 U.S. BANCORP A summary of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights and related characteristics by portfolio as of December 31, 2005, was as follows: (Dollars in Millions) MRBP Government Conventional Total Servicing portfolio ************************************************************************* Fair market value************************************************************************** Value (bps) ******************************************************************************* Weighted-average servicing fees (bps) ******************************************************* Multiple (value/servicing fees) *************************************************************** Weighted-average note rate **************************************************************** Age (in years) ***************************************************************************** Expected life (in years) ********************************************************************* Discount rate ***************************************************************************** $7,206 $ 118 164 42 3.90 6.03% 3.7 6.1 10.5% $9,063 $ 152 168 45 3.73 6.03% 2.7 6.3 10.7% $52,737 853 $ 162 35 4.63 5.70% 2.1 7.0 10.1% $69,006 $ 1,123 163 37 4.41 5.78% 2.3 6.8 10.2% Note 12 I N TA N G I B L E A S S E T S Intangible assets consisted of the following: December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Estimated Life (a) Amortization Method (b) Goodwill ************************************************************ Merchant processing contracts ***************************************** Core deposit beneﬁts ************************************************* Mortgage servicing rights ********************************************** Trust relationships **************************************************** Other identiﬁed intangibles ********************************************* — 9 years/8 years 10 years /6 years 7 years 15 years /7 years 8 years /4 years — SL/AC SL/AC AC SL/AC SL/AC Total ************************************************************* 2005 $7,005 767 262 1,118 477 250 $9,879 Balance 2004 $6,241 714 336 866 297 174 $8,628 (a) Estimated life represents the amortization period for assets subject to the straight line method and the weighted average amortization period for intangibles subject to accelerated methods. If more than one amortization method is used for a category, the estimated life for each method is calculated and reported separately. (b) Amortization methods: SL = straight line method AC = accelerated methods generally based on cash ﬂows Aggregate amortization expense consisted of the following: Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) Merchant processing contracts****************************************************************** Core deposit beneﬁts ************************************************************************** Mortgage servicing rights (a) ******************************************************************** Trust relationships ***************************************************************************** Other identiﬁed intangibles********************************************************************** 2005 $ 138 74 144 47 55 Total ************************************************************************************* $ 458 2004 $ 132 81 243 49 45 $ 550 2003 $ 132 88 365 53 44 $ 682 (a) Includes mortgage servicing rights reparation of $53 million and impairment of $57 million and $209 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Below is the estimated amortization expense for the next ﬁve years: (Dollars in Millions) 2006 ************************************************************************************************************************** 2007 ************************************************************************************************************************** 2008 ************************************************************************************************************************** 2009 ************************************************************************************************************************** 2010 ************************************************************************************************************************** $480 425 358 302 232 U.S. BANCORP 79 The following table reﬂects the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005: (Dollars in Millions) Wholesale Banking Consumer Banking Private Client, Trust and Asset Management Balance at December 31, 2003 ******************************* Goodwill acquired ***************************************** Other (a) ************************************************* Balance at December 31, 2004 ******************************* Goodwill acquired ***************************************** Other (a) ************************************************* Balance at December 31, 2005 ******************************* $1,225 — — $1,225 — — $1,225 (a) Other changes in goodwill include foreign exchange effects on non-dollar-denominated goodwill. $2,242 — — $2,242 — — $2,242 $ 742 101 — $ 843 500 — $1,343 Payment Services $1,816 105 10 $1,931 248 16 $2,195 Consolidated Company $6,025 206 10 $6,241 748 16 $7,005 Note 13 S H O RT - T E R M B O R R O W I N G S The following table is a summary of short-term borrowings for the last three years: (Dollars in Millions) At year-end 2005 2004 2003 Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Federal funds purchased*********************************** Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ************** Commercial paper **************************************** Treasury, tax and loan notes******************************** Other short-term borrowings ******************************* $ 3,133 10,854 4,419 430 1,364 3.93% 3.65 3.89 3.84 3.90 $ 3,379 4,848 2,634 251 1,972 1.25% 1.95 2.11 1.72 2.20 $ 5,098 3,586 699 809 658 Total ************************************************* $20,200 3.76% $13,084 1.84% $10,850 Average for the year Federal funds purchased*********************************** Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ************** Commercial paper **************************************** Treasury, tax and loan notes******************************** Other short-term borrowings ******************************* $ 2,916 11,849 3,326 142 1,149 6.63% 2.93 3.11 3.17 3.62 $ 3,823 6,144 1,144 804 2,619 3.10% 1.19 .91 1.01 2.01 $ 4,966 3,374 681 634 848 Total ************************************************* $19,382 3.56% $14,534 1.81% $10,503 .91% .71 .88 .69 .65 .81% 2.36% .79 1.06 .95 1.13 1.59% Maximum month-end balance Federal funds purchased*********************************** Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ************** Commercial paper **************************************** Treasury, tax and loan notes******************************** Other short-term borrowings ******************************* $ 4,559 14,931 4,419 430 1,563 $ 6,342 8,972 2,687 7,867 3,856 $ 6,658 4,173 952 4,223 2,676 80 U.S. BANCORP Note 14 L O N G - T E R M D E B T Long-term debt (debt with original maturities of more than one year) at December 31 consisted of the following: (Dollars in Millions) U.S. Bancorp (Parent Company) Fixed-rate subordinated notes 2005 2004 7.625% due 2005 ************************************************************************************* 6.75% due 2005 ************************************************************************************** 6.875% due 2007 ************************************************************************************* 7.30% due 2007 ************************************************************************************** 7.50% due 2026 ************************************************************************************** Floating-rate convertible senior debentures 2.69% due 2035 ************************************************************************************** 3.00% due 2035 ************************************************************************************** Medium-term notes *************************************************************************************** Junior subordinated debentures***************************************************************************** Capitalized lease obligations, mortgage indebtedness and other (a) ********************************************** $ — — 220 74 200 2,500 2,000 2,725 3,152 (17) Subtotal******************************************************************************************* 10,854 Subsidiaries Fixed-rate subordinated notes 7.30% due 2005 ************************************************************************************** 6.875% due 2006 ************************************************************************************* 6.625% due 2006 ************************************************************************************* 6.50% due 2008 ************************************************************************************** 6.30% due 2008 ************************************************************************************** 5.70% due 2008 ************************************************************************************** 7.125% due 2009 ************************************************************************************* 7.80% due 2010 ************************************************************************************** 6.375% due 2011 ************************************************************************************* 6.30% due 2014 ************************************************************************************** 4.95% due 2014 ************************************************************************************** 4.80% due 2015 ************************************************************************************** 3.80% due 2015 ************************************************************************************** Floating-rate subordinated notes 4.42% due 2014 ************************************************************************************** Federal Home Loan Bank advances ************************************************************************* Bank notes ********************************************************************************************** Capitalized lease obligations, mortgage indebtedness and other (a) ********************************************** Subtotal******************************************************************************************* — 23 26 300 300 400 500 — 1,500 963 1,000 500 370 550 4,041 15,400 342 26,215 $ 120 186 220 171 200 — — 3,225 2,629 148 6,899 100 70 100 300 300 400 500 300 1,500 963 650 500 — 350 3,629 17,624 554 27,840 Total ********************************************************************************************** $37,069 $34,739 (a) Other includes debt issuance fees and unrealized gains and losses and deferred fees relating to derivative instruments. In August 2005, the Company issued ﬂoating-rate convertible senior debentures of $2.5 billion, due August 21, 2035. These debentures bear interest at a ﬂoating-rate equal to three-month LIBOR, minus 1.68 percent, payable quarterly until August 21, 2026. After that date, the Company will not pay interest on the debentures prior to maturity. On the maturity date or certain earlier redemption dates, the holder will receive the original principal amount of $1,000 per debenture, plus accrued interest. At December 31, 2005, the interest rate was 2.69 percent. The debentures are callable anytime on or after August 21, 2006, at a price equal to 100 percent of the accreted principle amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and putable August 21, 2006, 2007, 2010, and every ﬁve years, thereafter, until maturity at a price equal to 100 percent of the accreted principle amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The debentures are convertible at any time on or prior to the maturity date at an initial conversion rate of 27.7316 shares for each $1,000 debenture. This results in a conversion price of approximately $36.06 per share and represents a premium of 20 percent over the closing sale price of $30.05 per share on August 9, 2005. If converted, holders of the convertible debentures will generally receive cash up to the accreted principal amount of the debentures and, if the market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the conversion price in effect on the conversion date, holders will also receive a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, or the equivalent amount in cash at the option of the Company, per debenture as determined pursuant to a speciﬁed formula. U.S. BANCORP 81 In December 2005, the Company issued ﬂoating-rate In October 2004, the Company’s subsidiary U.S. Bank convertible senior debentures of $2.0 billion, due December 11, 2035. These debentures bear interest at a ﬂoating-rate equal to three-month LIBOR, minus 1.46 percent, payable quarterly until December 11, 2030. After that date, the Company will not pay interest on the debentures prior to maturity. On the maturity date or certain earlier redemption dates, the holder will receive the original principal amount of $1,000 per debenture plus accrued interest. At December 31, 2005, the interest rate was 3.00 percent. The debentures are callable anytime on or after December 11, 2006, at a price equal to 100 percent of the accreted principle amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and putable December 11, 2006, March 11, 2007, June 11, 2007, September 11, 2007, December 11, 2007, 2010, and every ﬁve years, thereafter, until maturity at a price equal to 100 percent of the accreted principle amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The debentures are convertible at any time on or prior to the maturity date at an initial conversion rate of 27.1370 shares for each $1,000 debenture. This results in a conversion price of approximately $36.85 per share and represents a premium of 20 percent over the closing sale price of $30.71 per share on December 5, 2005. If converted, holders of the convertible debentures will generally receive cash up to the accreted principal amount of the debentures and, if the market price of the Company’s common stock exceeds the conversion price in effect on the conversion date, holders will also receive a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, or the equivalent amount in cash at the option of the Company, per debenture as determined pursuant to a speciﬁed formula. Medium-term notes (‘‘MTNs’’) outstanding at December 31, 2005, mature from March 2006 through July 2010. The MTNs bear ﬁxed interest rates ranging from 2.63 percent to 5.10 percent. The weighted-average interest rate of MTNs at December 31, 2005, was 3.82 percent. In March 2005, the Company issued $275 million of ﬁxed-rate junior subordinated debentures due March 9, 2035. The interest rate is 5.75 percent per annum. In August 2005, the Company issued $300 million of ﬁxed- rate junior subordinated debentures due August 15, 2035. The interest rate is 5.875 percent per annum. In December 2005, the Company also issued $375 million of ﬁxed-rate junior subordinated debentures due December 29, 2065. The interest rate is 6.35 percent per annum. National Association (‘‘USBNA’’) issued $650 million of ﬁxed-rate subordinated notes due October 30, 2014. The interest rate is 4.95 percent per annum. In January of 2005, USBNA issued $200 million of ﬁxed-rate subordinated notes due October 30, 2014. The interest rate is 4.95 percent per annum. In March 2005, USBNA issued $150 million of ﬁxed-rate subordinated debentures due October 30, 2014. The interest rate is 4.95 percent per annum. In August 2005, USBNA issued $370 million of ﬁxed-rate subordinated notes in foreign denomination due August 9, 2015. The interest rate is 3.80 percent per annum. The Company presents these foreign notes in U.S. dollars on the balance sheet. In October 2004, USBNA issued ﬂoating-rate subordinated notes of $350 million, due October 14, 2014. These notes bear ﬂoating-rate interest of three-month LIBOR plus .28 percent. The interest rate at December 31, 2005, was 4.42 percent. In January 2005, USBNA issued ﬂoating-rate subordinated notes of $200 million, due October 14, 2014. These notes bear ﬂoating-rate interest of three-month LIBOR plus .28 percent. The interest rate at December 31, 2005, was 4.42 percent. Federal Home Loan Bank (‘‘FHLB’’) advances outstanding at December 31, 2005, mature from August 2006 through September 2035. The advances bear ﬁxed or ﬂoating interest rates ranging from .50 percent to 8.25 percent. The Company has an arrangement with the FHLB whereby based on collateral available (residential and commercial mortgages), the Company could have borrowed an additional $23.0 billion at December 31, 2005. The weighted-average interest rate of FHLB advances at December 31, 2005, was 4.47 percent. Bank notes outstanding at December 31, 2005, mature from February 2006 through March 2009. The bank notes bear ﬁxed or ﬂoating interest rates ranging from 2.40 percent to 4.55 percent. The weighted-average interest rate of bank notes at December 31, 2005, was 4.09 percent. During 2005, the Company prepaid long-term debt, including subordinated notes and junior subordinated debentures, of $.7 billion in connection with asset/liability management decisions, incurring $54 million in prepayment charges. 82 U.S. BANCORP Maturities of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2005, were: (Dollars in Millions) 2006 ********************************************************************************************************** 2007 ********************************************************************************************************** 2008 ********************************************************************************************************** 2009 ********************************************************************************************************** 2010 ********************************************************************************************************** Thereafter ****************************************************************************************************** Parent Company $ 626 1,378 504 5 496 7,845 Total *********************************************************************************************************** $10,854 Consolidated $ 7,690 8,226 4,648 997 2,502 13,006 $37,069 Note 15 J U N I O R S U B O R D I N AT E D D E B E N T U R E S The Company sponsors and wholly owns 100% of the common equity of eleven trusts that were formed for the purpose of issuing Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities (‘‘Trust Preferred Securities’’) to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities solely in junior subordinated debt securities of the Company (the ‘‘Debentures’’). The Debentures held by the trusts, which total $3.2 billion, are the sole assets of each trust. The Company’s obligations under the Debentures and related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the obligations of the Trusts. The guarantee covers the distributions and payments on liquidation or redemption of the Trust Preferred Securities, but only to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The Company used the proceeds from the sales of the Debentures for general corporate purposes. The Company has the right to redeem retail Debentures in whole or in part, on or after speciﬁc dates, at a redemption price speciﬁed in the indentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company has the right to redeem institutional Debentures in whole, (but not in part), on or after speciﬁc dates, at a redemption price speciﬁed in the indentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Debentures are redeemable in 2006, 2007 and 2010 in the amounts of $1.9 billion, $310 million and $979 million, respectively. In March 2004, as a result of adopting the provisions of Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), ‘‘Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities’’, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, ‘‘Consolidated Financial Statements’’, the Company was required to de-consolidate these subsidiary trusts from its ﬁnancial statements. The de-consolidation of the net assets and results of operations of the trusts had an insigniﬁcant impact on the Company’s ﬁnancial statements and liquidity position since the Company continues to be obligated to repay the Debentures held by the trusts and guarantees repayment of the Trust Preferred Securities issued by the trusts. The consolidated debt obligation related to the trusts increased $79 million upon de-consolidation with the increase representing the Company’s common equity ownership in the trusts. The Trust Preferred Securities held by the trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital for the Company under the Federal Reserve Board guidelines. The banking regulatory agencies have issued guidance that would continue the current regulatory capital treatment for Trust Preferred Securities. U.S. BANCORP 83 The following table is a summary of the Debentures included in long-term debt as of December 31, 2005: Issuance Trust (Dollars in Millions) Issuance Date Retail USB Capital VIII ******************* December 2005 USB Capital VII ******************* August 2005 USB Capital VI ******************** March 2005 USB Capital V ******************** December 2001 USB Capital IV ******************** November 2001 USB Capital III ******************** May 2001 Institutional Star Capital I********************** June 1997 Mercantile Capital Trust I *********** February 1997 U.S. Bancorp Capital I ************* December 1996 Firstar Capital Trust I *************** December 1996 FBS Capital I ********************* November 1996 Trust Preferred Securities Amount $ 375 300 275 300 500 700 150 150 80 150 77 Debentures Amount Rate Type (a) Rate Maturity Date Earliest Redemption Date $ 387 309 283 309 515 722 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 155 155 82 155 80 Variable Variable Fixed Fixed Fixed 6.35 5.88 5.75 7.25 7.35 7.75 5.26 5.10 8.27 8.32 8.09 August 2035 March 2035 December 2065 December 29, 2010 August 15, 2010 March 9, 2010 December 2031 December 7, 2006 November 2031 November 1, 2006 May 4, 2006 May 2031 June 2027 February 2027 June 15, 2007 February 1, 2007 December 2026 December 15, 2006 December 2026 December 15, 2006 November 2026 November 15, 2006 Total************************** $3,057 $3,152 (a) The variable-rate Trust Preferred Securities and Debentures reprice quarterly based on three-month LIBOR. Note 16 S H A R E H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had authority to issue 4 billion shares of common stock and 50 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 1,815 million and 1,858 million shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2005, the Company had 151 million shares of common stock reserved for future issuances, primarily under stock option plans. The Company has a preferred share purchase rights plan intended to preserve the long-term value of the Company by discouraging a hostile takeover of the Company. Under the plan, each share of common stock carries a right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of preferred stock. The rights become exercisable in certain limited circumstances involving a potential business combination transaction or an acquisition of shares of the Company and are exercisable at a price of $100 per right, subject to adjustment. Following certain other events, each right entitles its holder to purchase for $100 an amount of common stock of the Company, or, in certain circumstances, securities of the acquirer, having a then-current market value of twice the exercise price of the right. The dilutive effect of the rights on the acquiring company is intended to encourage it to negotiate with the Company’s Board of Directors prior to attempting a takeover. If the Board of Directors believes a proposed acquisition is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board may amend the plan or redeem the rights for a nominal amount in order to permit the acquisition to be completed without interference from the plan. Until a right is exercised, the holder of a right has no rights as a shareholder of the Company. The rights expire on February 27, 2011. On December 18, 2001, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 100 million shares of common stock through 2003. In 2003, the Company repurchased 7 million shares of common stock under the plan, which expired in December of 2003. On December 16, 2003, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of outstanding common stock during the following 24 months. During 2003, the Company repurchased 8 million shares under the December 2003 plan. In 2004, the Company repurchased 89 million shares of common stock under the plan. On December 21, 2004, the Board of Directors approved an authorization to repurchase 150 million shares of outstanding common stock during the following 24 months. This new repurchase program replaces the Company’s December 16, 2003, program. In 2004, the Company repurchased 5 million shares of common stock under the plan. During 2005, all share repurchases were made under the 2004 plan. The following table summarizes the Company’s common stock repurchased in each of the last three years: (Dollars and Shares in Millions) 2005 ****************************************************************************************************** 2004 ****************************************************************************************************** 2003 ****************************************************************************************************** Shares 62 94 15 Value $1,807 2,656 417 84 U.S. BANCORP Shareholders’ equity is affected by transactions and valuations of asset and liability positions that require adjustments to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The reconciliation of the transactions affecting Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income included in shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, is as follows: (Dollars in Millions) 2005 Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale *********************************** Unrealized loss on derivatives ************************************************* Foreign currency translation adjustment **************************************** Realized loss on derivatives*************************************************** Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for losses realized in net income ********************** Minimum pension liability adjustment ******************************************* Pre-tax $ (539) (58) 3 (74) 39 (38) Total ******************************************************************* $ (667) 2004 Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale *********************************** Unrealized loss on derivatives ************************************************* Foreign currency translation adjustment **************************************** Realized gain on derivatives ************************************************** Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for losses realized in net income ********************** $ (123) (43) (17) 16 32 Total ******************************************************************* $ (135) 2003 Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale *********************************** Unrealized loss on derivatives ************************************************* Foreign currency translation adjustment **************************************** Realized gain on derivatives ************************************************** Reclassiﬁcation adjustment for gains realized in net income *********************** $ (716) (373) 23 199 (288) Total ******************************************************************* $(1,155) Transactions Tax-effect Net-of-tax Balances Net-of-Tax $205 22 (1) 28 (15) 15 $254 $ 47 16 6 (6) (12) $ 51 $272 142 (9) (76) 110 $439 $(334) (36) 2 (46) 24 (23) $(413) $ (76) (27) (11) 10 20 $ (84) $(444) (231) 14 123 (178) $(716) $(402) (27) 7 16 — (23) $(429) $(135) 9 5 105 — $ (16) $(123) 35 16 140 — $ 68 Regulatory Capital The measures used to assess capital include the capital ratios established by bank regulatory agencies, including the speciﬁc ratios for the ‘‘well capitalized’’ designation. For a description of the regulatory capital requirements and the actual ratios as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, for the Company and its bank subsidiaries, see Table 21 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which is incorporated by reference into these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Note 17 E A R N I N G S P E R S H A R E The components of earnings per share were: (Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except Per Share Data) 2005 2004 2003 Income from continuing operations ************************************************************** Income from discontinued operations (after-tax) *************************************************** $4,489 — Net income **************************************************************************** $4,489 Average common shares outstanding ************************************************************ Net effect of the assumed purchase of stock based on the treasury stock method for options and 1,831 stock plans ******************************************************************************* 26 Average diluted common shares outstanding****************************************************** 1,857 Earnings per share Income from continuing operations *********************************************************** Discontinued operations ******************************************************************** $ 2.45 — Net income ************************************************************************* $ 2.45 Diluted earnings per share Income from continuing operations *********************************************************** Discontinued operations ******************************************************************** $ 2.42 — Net income ************************************************************************* $ 2.42 $4,167 — $4,167 1,887 26 1,913 $ 2.21 — $ 2.21 $ 2.18 — $ 2.18 $3,710 23 $3,733 1,924 12 1,936 $ 1.93 .01 $ 1.94 $ 1.92 .01 $ 1.93 U.S. BANCORP 85 For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, options to purchase 16 million, 36 million and 79 million shares, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2005, outstanding convertible notes that could potentially be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a speciﬁed formula, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive. Note 18 E M P L O Y E E B E N E F I T S Employee Investment Plan The Company has a deﬁned contribution retirement savings plan which allows qualiﬁed employees to make contributions up to 50 percent of their annual compensation, subject to Internal Revenue Service limits, through salary deductions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employee contributions are invested, at the employees’ direction, among a variety of investment alternatives. Employee contributions are 100 percent matched by the Company, up to four percent of an employee’s eligible annual compensation. The Company’s matching contribution vests immediately; however, a participant must be employed in an eligible position on the last business day of the year to receive that year’s matching contribution. Although the matching contribution is initially invested in the Company’s common stock, an employee can reinvest the matching contributions among various investment alternatives. Total expense was $53 million, $49 million and $49 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Pension Plans Pension beneﬁts are provided to substantially all employees based on years of service and employees’ compensation while employed with the Company. Employees are fully vested after ﬁve years of service. Prior to their acquisition dates, employees of certain acquired companies were covered by separate, noncontributory pension plans that provided beneﬁts based on years of service and compensation. Generally, the Company merges plans of acquired companies into its existing pension plans when it becomes practicable. Under the current plan’s beneﬁt structure, a participant’s future retirement beneﬁts are based on a participant’s highest ﬁve-year average annual compensation during his or her last 10 years before retirement or termination from the Company. Prior to the merger with Firstar Corporation, two of the previous companies had cash balance pension beneﬁt structures under which the participants earned retirement beneﬁts based on their average compensation over their entire career, while the former Firstar Corporation retirement beneﬁt structure was based on ﬁnal average pay and years of service, similar to the current plan. Plan assets primarily consist of various equities, equity mutual funds and other miscellaneous assets. 86 U.S. BANCORP In general, the Company’s pension plan objectives include maintaining a funded status sufﬁcient to meet participant beneﬁt obligations over time while reducing long-term funding requirements and pension costs. The Company has an established process for evaluating all the plans, their performance and signiﬁcant plan assumptions, including the assumed discount rate and the long-term rate of return (LTROR). At least annually, an independent consultant is engaged to assist U.S. Bancorp’s Compensation Committee (‘‘the Committee’’) in evaluating plan objectives, funding policies and plan investment policies considering its long-term investment time horizon and asset allocation strategies. The process also evaluates signiﬁcant plan assumptions. Although plan assumptions are established annually, the Company may update its analysis on an interim basis in order to be responsive to signiﬁcant events that occur during the year, such as plan mergers and amendments. In addition to the funded qualiﬁed retirement plan, the Company maintains a non-qualiﬁed plan that is unfunded and the aggregate accumulated beneﬁt obligation exceeds the assets. The assumptions used in computing the present value of the accumulated beneﬁt obligation, the projected beneﬁt obligation and net pension expense are substantially consistent with those assumptions used for the funded qualiﬁed plan. The Company recognized a settlement loss of $4 million on this plan in 2003, related to the level of payouts made from the plan. Funding Practices The Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts to its plans sufﬁcient to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, plus such additional amounts as the Company determines to be appropriate. No contributions were made in 2004 or 2005. In 2006, the Company anticipates no minimum funding requirement and therefore does not expect to make any contributions to the plan. Contributions made to the plan were invested in accordance with established investment policies and asset allocation strategies. Investment Policies and Asset Allocation In establishing its investment policies and asset allocation strategies, the Company considers expected returns and the volatility associated with different strategies. An independent consultant performs modeling that projects numerous outcomes using a broad range of possible scenarios, including a mix of possible rates of inﬂation and economic growth. Some of the scenarios included are: low inﬂation and high growth (ideal growth), low inﬂation and low growth (recession), high inﬂation and low growth (stagﬂation) and high inﬂation and high growth (inﬂationary growth). Starting with current economic information, the model bases its projections on past relationships between inﬂation, ﬁxed income rates and equity returns when these types of economic conditions have existed over the previous 30 years, both in the U.S. and in foreign countries. Generally, based on historical performance of the various investment asset classes, investments in equities have outperformed other investment classes but are subject to higher volatility. While an asset allocation including bonds and other assets generally has lower volatility and may provide protection in a declining interest rate environment, it limits the pension plan’s long-term up-side potential. Given the pension plan’s investment horizon and the ﬁnancial viability of the Company to meet its funding objectives, the Committee has determined that an asset allocation strategy investing in 100 percent equities diversiﬁed among various domestic equity categories and international equities is appropriate. The following unaudited table provides a summary of asset allocations adopted by the Company compared with a typical asset allocation alternative: Asset Class Typical Asset Mix Asset Allocation December 2005 December 2004 2005 Expected Returns Actual Target Actual Target (a) Compound Average Standard Deviation Domestic equities Large Cap ********************* Mid Cap ********************** Small Cap ********************* International equities ********** Fixed income ******************* Other *************************** Total mix or weighted rates**** LTROR assumed *************** Standard deviation************** Sharpe ratio (c)***************** 30% 15 15 10 30 — 100% 7.6% 13.5% .405 56% 16 5 21 — 2 55% 19 6 20 — — 53% 16 7 22 — 2 100% 100% 100% 8.9% (b) 17.8% .379 55% 19 6 20 — — 100% 8.9% 18.0% .386 8.0% 8.2 8.4 8.2 9.5% 10.2 10.9 10.3 18.0% 21.1 24.0 21.9 8.3 9.8 17.8 (a) The target asset allocation was modiﬁed in December 2003, effective January 1, 2004, to reduce the potential volatility of the portfolio without signiﬁcantly reducing the expected returns. The change in the allocation was completed by the second quarter of 2004 and the year end variations from the target allocation were a result of that change. (b) The LTROR assumed for the target asset allocation strategy of 8.9 percent is based on a range of estimates evaluated by the Company including the compound expected return of 8.3 percent and the average expected return of 9.8 percent. (c) The Sharpe ratio is a direct measure of reward-to-risk. The Sharpe ratio for these asset allocation strategies is considered to be within acceptable parameters. In accordance with its existing practices, the independent pension consultant utilized by the Company updated the analysis of expected rates of return and evaluated peer group data, market conditions and other factors relevant to determining the LTROR assumptions for pension costs for 2004 and 2005. The analysis performed indicated that the LTROR assumption of 8.9 percent, used in both 2004 and 2005, continued to be in line with expected returns based on current economic conditions and the Company expects to continue using this LTROR in 2006. The LTROR was first reduced to the current LTROR of 8.9 percent in 2003 to reflect the long range impact of the poor market performance of equities in 2001 and 2002. Regardless of the extent of the Company’s analysis of alternative asset allocation strategies, economic scenarios and possible outcomes, plan assumptions developed for the LTROR are subject to imprecision and changes in economic factors. As a result of the modeling imprecision and uncertainty, the Company considers a range of potential expected rates of return, economic conditions for several scenarios, historical performance relative to assumed rates of return and asset allocation and LTROR information for a peer group in establishing its assumptions. Post-Retirement Medical Plans In addition to providing pension beneﬁts, the Company provides health care and death beneﬁts to certain retired employees through one retiree medical program. Generally, all active employees may become eligible for retiree health care beneﬁts by meeting deﬁned age and service requirements. The Company may also subsidize the cost of coverage for employees meeting certain age and service requirements. The medical plan contains other cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. The estimated cost of these retiree beneﬁt payments is accrued during the employees’ active service. U.S. BANCORP 87 In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was enacted. The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare, known as ‘‘Medicare Part D’’, and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The Company recognized the estimated expected benefit prospectively from July 1, 2004. The expected subsidy reduced the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) at September 30, 2004, by $40 million, and net periodic cost for 2004 by $2 million. Based on final regulations issued during 2005, the expected benefit impact of the Medicare subsidy increased and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was reduced by an additional $10 million as of September 30, 2005. The net periodic cost for 2005 was reduced by $5 million. The Company does not expect a significant reduction in future participation in the postretirement medical plan as a result of the Act. The Company uses a measurement date of September 30 for its retirement plans. The following table summarizes beneﬁt obligation and plan asset activity for the retirement plans: (Dollars in Millions) Projected beneﬁt obligation Pension Plans Post-Retirement Medical Plans 2005 2004 2005 2004 Beneﬁt obligation at beginning of measurement period ************************ Service cost ************************************************************* Interest cost ************************************************************* Plan participants’ contributions ********************************************* Actuarial (gain) loss ******************************************************* Beneﬁt payments********************************************************* Curtailments ************************************************************* Settlements************************************************************** Amendments ************************************************************ $1,951 63 112 — 145 (88) — (36) — Beneﬁt obligation at end of measurement period (a)(b) ************************* $2,147 Fair value of plan assets Fair value at beginning of measurement period ******************************* Actual return on plan assets *********************************************** Employer contributions **************************************************** Plan participants’ contributions ********************************************* Settlements************************************************************** Beneﬁt payments********************************************************* $2,127 398 18 — (36) (88) Fair value at end of measurement period ************************************ $2,419 Funded status Funded status at end of measurement period ******************************** Unrecognized transition (asset) obligation ************************************ Unrecognized prior service cost ******************************************** Unrecognized net (gain) loss *********************************************** Fourth quarter contribution ************************************************ $ 272 — (39) 724 11 Net amount recognized *************************************************** $ 968 Components of statement of ﬁnancial position Prepaid beneﬁt cost ****************************************************** Accrued beneﬁt liability **************************************************** Additional minimum liability ************************************************ Intangible asset ********************************************************** Accumulated other comprehensive income*********************************** $1,146 (178) (47) 9 38 Net amount recognized *************************************************** $ 968 $1,801 59 109 — 150 (86) — (82) — $1,951 $1,976 298 21 — (82) (86) $2,127 $ 176 — (45) 841 4 $ 976 $1,155 (179) — — — $ 976 $ 281 5 16 17 (38) (36) — — — $ 245 $ 39 1 18 17 — (36) $ 39 $(206) 5 (5) — 155 $ (51) $ — (51) — — — $ (51) $ 320 4 18 16 (40) (37) — — — $ 281 $ 39 — 21 16 — (37) $ 39 $(242) 6 (6) 38 4 $(200) $ — (200) — — — $(200) (a) At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the accumulated beneﬁt obligation for all qualiﬁed pension plans was $1.8 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively. (b) U.S. Bancorp retained the qualiﬁed pension plan obligation for the inactive participants, relating to employees of the Piper Jaffray Companies. Therefore, all liabilities and plan assets related to inactive participants in the qualiﬁed pension plan associated with the Piper Jaffray Companies are included in the pension plans beneﬁt obligation. 88 U.S. BANCORP The following table sets forth the components of net periodic beneﬁt cost (income) for the retirement plans: (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2005 2004 2003 Pension Plans Post-Retirement Medical Plans Components of net periodic beneﬁt cost (income) Service cost ************************************************* Interest cost ************************************************* Expected return on plan assets ******************************** Net amortization and deferral ********************************** Recognized actuarial (gain) loss ******************************** Net periodic beneﬁt cost (income) ********************************* Curtailment and settlement (gain) loss *************************** $ 63 112 (194) (6) 58 33 — $ 59 109 (203) (6) 50 9 — $ 56 108 (184) (7) (1) (28) 4 $ 5 16 (1) — — 20 — $ 4 18 (1) — 2 23 — $ 3 19 (1) — — 21 — Net periodic beneﬁt cost (income) after curtailment and settlement (gain) loss, and cost of special or contractual termination beneﬁts recognized ******************************************* $ 33 $ 9 $ (24) $20 $23 $21 The following table sets forth the weighted-average plan assumptions and other data: (Dollars in Millions) Pension plan actuarial computations 2005 2004 2003 Expected long-term return on plan assets ******************************************************* Discount rate in determining beneﬁt obligations (a) ************************************************ Rate of increase in future compensation ********************************************************* Post-retirement medical plan actuarial computations Expected long-term return on plan assets ******************************************************* Discount rate in determining beneﬁt obligations*************************************************** Health care cost trend rate (b) 8.9% 5.7 3.5 3.5% 5.7 Prior to age 65 *************************************************************************** After age 65****************************************************************************** 9.0% 11.0 Effect of one percent increase in health care cost trend rate Service and interest costs ********************************************************************* Accumulated post-retirement beneﬁt obligation *************************************************** Effect of one percent decrease in health care cost trend rate Service and interest costs ********************************************************************* Accumulated post-retirement beneﬁt obligation *************************************************** $ 1 18 $ (1) (16) 8.9% 6.0 3.5 3.5% 6.0 10.0% 12.0 $ $ 1 21 (1) (19) 8.9% 6.2 3.5 3.5% 6.2 11.0% 13.0 $ $ 1 23 (1) (20) (a) The discount rate at the measurement date approximated the Moody’s Aa corporate bond rating for projected beneﬁt distributions with a duration of 12.7 and 11.9 years for 2005 and 2004, respectively. (b) The pre-65 and post-65 rates are assumed to decrease gradually to 5.5% and 6.0% respectively by 2011 and remain at these levels thereafter. The following table provides information for pension plans with beneﬁt obligations in excess of plan assets: (Dollars in Millions) Beneﬁt obligation *********************************************************************************************** Accumulated beneﬁt obligation *********************************************************************************** Fair value of plan assets ***************************************************************************************** 2005 $236 225 — 2004 $234 223 — The following beneﬁt payments (net of participant contributions) are expected to be paid from the U.S. Bancorp Pension and Postretirement Medical Plans: (Dollars in Millions) Estimated Future Beneﬁt Payments Pension Plans Post-Retirement Medical Plans 2006***************************************************************************************************** 2007***************************************************************************************************** 2008***************************************************************************************************** 2009***************************************************************************************************** 2010***************************************************************************************************** 2011 — 2015 ********************************************************************************************* $137 124 122 123 127 690 $ 20 21 21 21 21 104 U.S. BANCORP 89 Note 19 S T O C K - B A S E D C O M P E N S AT I O N As part of its employee and director compensation programs, the Company may grant certain stock awards under the provisions of the existing stock compensation plans, including plans assumed in acquisitions. The plans provide for grants of options to purchase shares of common stock at a ﬁxed price generally equal to the fair value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Option grants are generally exercisable up to ten years from the date of grant. In addition, the plans provide for grants of shares of common stock or stock units that are subject to restriction on transfer. Most stock awards vest over three to ﬁve years and are subject to forfeiture if certain vesting requirements are not met. Stock incentive plans of acquired companies are generally terminated at the merger closing dates. Option holders under such plans receive the Company’s common stock, or options to buy the Company’s stock, based on the conversion terms of the various merger agreements. The historical stock award information presented below has been restated to reﬂect the options originally granted under acquired companies’ plans. At December 31, 2005, there were 25 million shares (subject to adjustment for forfeitures) available for grant under various plans. The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercised under various stock options plans of the Company: 2005 2004 2003 Options/Shares Stock Weighted-Average Exercise Price Options/Shares Stock Weighted-Average Exercise Price Options/Shares Stock Weighted-Average Exercise Price Year Ended December 31 Stock option plans Number outstanding at beginning of year **************************** Granted**************************** Assumed/converted (a)*************** Exercised ************************** Cancelled (b) *********************** 134,727,285 12,489,062 — (17,719,565) (3,513,321) Number outstanding at end of year **************************** Exercisable at end of year ************ 125,983,461 100,110,188 Weighted-average fair value of shares granted ************************* Restricted share plans Number outstanding at beginning of year **************************** Granted**************************** Cancelled/vested ******************** 2,265,625 1,024,622 (646,076) Number outstanding at end of year **************************** 2,644,171 Weighted-average fair value of shares granted ************************* $22.77 23.00 — 18.27 25.13 $22.93 $23.60 $ 6.82 $23.41 30.14 — 20.96 25.07 $24.38 $23.64 $ 6.65 165,522,354 8,741,521 — (27,319,242) (12,217,348) 134,727,285 101,027,155 1,304,106 1,338,054 (376,535) 2,265,625 $22.93 28.46 — 21.59 24.56 $23.41 $23.51 $ 8.75 206,252,590 1,872,653 1,116,884 (22,484,069) (21,235,704) 165,522,354 116,427,321 2,280,057 58,481 (1,034,432) 1,304,106 $30.03 $28.42 $24.43 (a) In connection with the December 31, 2003, tax-free distribution of Piper Jaffray Companies, stock options were adjusted in accordance with provisions of the contracts based on an exchange ratio of 1.0068 representing the relative stock price adjustment at the time of distribution. (b) Options cancelled includes both non-vested (i.e., forfeitures) and vested shares. 90 U.S. BANCORP Additional information regarding stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2005, is as follows: Range of Exercise Prices $5.05 — $10.00 ***************************************** $10.01 — $15.00 **************************************** $15.01 — $20.00 **************************************** $20.01 — $25.00 **************************************** $25.01 — $30.00 **************************************** $30.01 — $35.00 **************************************** $35.01 — $36.95 **************************************** Shares 91,470 2,107,124 20,476,728 52,679,575 35,825,425 14,515,311 287,828 125,983,461 Options Outstanding Exercisable Options Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) .7 1.7 5.1 5.1 4.3 7.0 1.4 5.0 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $ 7.31 11.37 18.80 22.37 28.58 30.91 35.90 Shares 91,470 2,107,124 20,295,870 45,685,591 27,713,694 3,928,611 287,828 $24.38 100,110,188 Weighted- Average Exercise Price $ 7.31 11.37 18.80 22.48 28.68 32.72 35.90 $23.64 Stock-based compensation was $132 million in 2005, compared with $176 million and $158 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. At the time employee stock options expire, are exercised or cancelled, the Company determines the tax beneﬁt associated with the stock award and under certain circumstances may be required to recognize an adjustment to tax expense. On an after-tax basis, stock- based compensation was $83 million in 2005, compared with $139 million and $123 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The following table provides a summary of the valuation assumptions utilized by the Company to determine the estimated value of stock option grants: Weighted-average assumptions in stock option valuation 2005 2004 2003 Risk-free interest rates **************************************************************************************** Dividend yields*********************************************************************************************** Stock volatility factor****************************************************************************************** Expected life of options (in years) ******************************************************************************* 3.6% 3.5% .29 5.4 3.5% 3.5% .40 5.9 2.8% 3.0% .40 5.3 Stock-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant or modiﬁcation. The fair value of options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model requiring the use of subjective valuation assumptions. Because employee stock options have characteristics that differ from those of traded options, including vesting provisions and trading limitations that impact their liquidity, the determined value used to measure compensation expense may vary from their actual fair value. U.S. BANCORP 91 Note 20 I N C O M E TA X E S The components of income tax expense were: (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 Federal Current ******************************************************************************** Deferred ******************************************************************************* $2,107 (281) Federal income tax ****************************************************************** 1,826 State Current ******************************************************************************** Deferred ******************************************************************************* State income tax ******************************************************************** 276 (20) 256 $1,531 260 1,791 197 21 218 $1,529 223 1,752 139 50 189 Total income tax provision ************************************************************ $2,082 $2,009 $1,941 A reconciliation of expected income tax expense at the federal statutory rate of 35 percent to the Company’s applicable income tax expense follows: (Dollars in Millions) Tax at statutory rate (35 percent)********************************************************** State income tax, at statutory rates, net of federal tax beneﬁt ********************************* Tax effect of Tax credits************************************************************************** Resolution of federal and state income tax examinations ********************************** Tax-exempt income from life insurance ************************************************* Tax-exempt interest, net ************************************************************** Other items ************************************************************************* 2005 $2,300 166 (221) (94) (48) (22) 1 2004 $2,162 142 (146) (106) (37) (22) 16 2003 $1,978 123 (110) — (37) (22) 9 Applicable income taxes ***************************************************************** $2,082 $2,009 $1,941 The tax effects of fair value adjustments on securities available-for-sale, derivative instruments in cash ﬂow hedges and certain tax beneﬁts related to stock options are recorded directly to shareholders’ equity as part of other comprehensive income. In preparing its tax returns, the Company is required to interpret complex tax laws and regulations and utilize income and cost allocation methods to determine its taxable income. On an ongoing basis, the Company is subject to examinations by federal and state taxing authorities that may give rise to differing interpretations of these complex laws, regulations and methods. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and matters are resolved. Included in 2005 was a $94 million reduction in income tax expense related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for the years 2000 through 2002. In addition, included in 2004 was a reduction in income tax expense of $90 million related to the resolution of federal income tax examinations covering substantially all of the Company’s legal entities for the years 1995 through 1999 and $16 million related to the resolution of a state tax examination for tax years through 2000. The resolution of these cycles was the result of negotiations held between the Company and representatives of various taxing authorities throughout the examinations. The resolution of these matters and the taxing authorities’ acceptance of submitted claims and tax return adjustments resulted in the reduction of estimated income tax liabilities. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reﬂect the tax effect of temporary difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for ﬁnancial reporting purposes and the amounts used for the same items for income tax reporting purposes. 92 U.S. BANCORP The signiﬁcant components of the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of December 31 were: (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 Deferred tax assets Allowance for credit losses********************************************************************************** Stock compensation *************************************************************************************** Securities available-for-sale and ﬁnancial instruments *********************************************************** Intangible asset basis ************************************************************************************** Federal AMT credits and capital losses *********************************************************************** Accrued expenses ***************************************************************************************** Accrued severance, pension and retirement beneﬁts *********************************************************** Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards ************************************************************* Other deferred tax assets, net ******************************************************************************* $ 907 325 254 134 91 71 19 9 90 Gross deferred tax assets ******************************************************************************* 1,900 Deferred tax liabilities Leasing activities ****************************************************************************************** Pension and postretirement beneﬁts************************************************************************** Mortgage servicing rights *********************************************************************************** Loans**************************************************************************************************** Other investment basis differences *************************************************************************** Deferred fees ********************************************************************************************* Accelerated depreciation *********************************************************************************** Other deferred tax liabilities, net ***************************************************************************** Gross deferred tax liabilities ****************************************************************************** Valuation allowance **************************************************************************************** (2,560) (267) (113) (96) (88) (85) (51) (254) (3,514) (1) $ 925 303 13 146 59 149 16 9 85 1,705 (2,771) (272) (94) (59) (80) (78) (56) (193) (3,603) (1) Net deferred tax liability ******************************************************************************* $(1,615) $(1,899) The Company has established a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets related to state net operating loss carryforwards which are expected to expire unused. The Company has approximately $138 million of net operating loss carryforwards which expire at various times through 2023. Certain events covered by Internal Revenue Code section 593(e), which was not repealed, will trigger a recapture of base year reserves of acquired thrift institutions. The base year reserves of acquired thrift Note 21 D E R I VAT I V E I N S T R U M E N T S In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into derivative transactions to manage its interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency risks and to accommodate the business requirements of its customers. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. Refer to Note 1 ‘‘Signiﬁcant Accounting Policies’’ in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies for derivative instruments. For information related to derivative positions held for asset and liability management purposes and customer-related derivative positions, see Table 18 ‘‘Derivative Positions,’’ included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which is incorporated by reference in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. institutions would be recaptured if an entity ceases to qualify as a bank for federal income tax purposes. The base year reserves of thrift institutions also remain subject to income tax penalty provisions that, in general, require recapture upon certain stock redemptions of, and excess distributions to, stockholders. At December 31, 2005, retained earnings included approximately $102 million of base year reserves for which no deferred federal income tax liability has been recognized. A S S E T A N D L I A B I L I T Y M A N A G E M E N T P O S I T I O N S Cash Flow Hedges The Company has $17.2 billion of designated cash ﬂow hedges at December 31, 2005. These derivatives are interest rate swaps that are hedges of the forecasted cash ﬂows from the underlying variable-rate LIBOR loans and ﬂoating-rate debt. All cash ﬂow hedges are highly effective for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was not material. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, accumulated other comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax net loss of $10 million and a deferred after-tax net gain of $113 million, respectively, related to cash ﬂow hedges. The unrealized gain or loss will be reﬂected in earnings when the related cash ﬂows or hedged transactions occur and will offset the related performance of the hedged items. The U.S. BANCORP 93 occurrence of these related cash ﬂows and hedged transactions remains probable. The estimated amount of after-tax gain to be reclassiﬁed from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings during 2006 is $26 million. This includes gains related to hedges that were terminated early and the forecasted transactions are still probable. Fair Value Hedges The Company has $10.1 billion of designated fair value hedges at December 31, 2005. These derivatives are primarily interest rate swaps that hedge the change in fair value related to interest rate changes of underlying ﬁxed-rate debt, trust preferred securities and deposit obligations. In addition, the Company uses forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to hedge its interest rate risk related to residential mortgage loans held for sale. The Company commits to sell the loans at speciﬁed prices in a future period, typically within 90 days. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk during the period between issuing a loan commitment and the sale of the loan into the secondary market. All fair value hedges are considered highly effective for the year ended December 31, 2005. The change in fair value attributed to hedge ineffectiveness was a loss of $4 million, related to the Company’s mortgage loans held for sale and its 2005 production volume of $23.0 billion. Net Investment Hedges The Company enters into derivatives to protect its net investment in certain foreign operations. The Company uses forward commitments to sell speciﬁed amounts of certain foreign currencies to hedge its capital volatility risk associated with ﬂuctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The net amount of gains or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment for 2005 was not signiﬁcant. Other Asset and Liability Management Derivative Positions The Company has derivative positions that are used for interest rate risk and other risk management purposes but are not designated as cash ﬂow hedges or fair value hedges in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.’’ At December 31, 2005, the Company had $1.1 billion of forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to hedge the Company’s interest rate risk related to $1.1 billion of unfunded residential loan commitments. Gains and losses on mortgage banking derivatives and the unfunded loan commitments are included in mortgage banking revenue on the income statement. C U S T O M E R - R E L AT E D P O S I T I O N S The Company acts as a seller and buyer of interest rate contracts and foreign exchange rate contracts on behalf of customers. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $26.9 billion of aggregate customer derivative positions, including $22.7 billion of interest rate swaps, caps, and 94 U.S. BANCORP ﬂoors and $4.2 billion of foreign exchange rate contracts. The Company minimizes its market and liquidity risks by taking similar offsetting positions. Gains or losses on customer-related transactions were not signiﬁcant for the year ended December 31, 2005. Note 22 FA I R VA L U E S O F F I N A N C I A L I N S T R U M E N T S Due to the nature of its business and its customers’ needs, the Company offers a large number of ﬁnancial instruments, most of which are not actively traded. When market quotes are unavailable, valuation techniques including discounted cash ﬂow calculations and pricing models or services are used. The Company also uses various aggregation methods and assumptions, such as the discount rate and cash ﬂow timing and amounts. As a result, the fair value estimates can neither be substantiated by independent market comparisons, nor realized by the immediate sale or settlement of the ﬁnancial instrument. Also, the estimates reﬂect a point in time and could change signiﬁcantly based on changes in economic factors, such as interest rates. Furthermore, the disclosure of certain ﬁnancial and nonﬁnancial assets and liabilities is not required. Finally, the fair value disclosure is not intended to estimate a market value of the Company as a whole. A summary of the Company’s valuation techniques and assumptions follows. Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying value of cash, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements was assumed to approximate fair value. Securities Investment securities were valued using available market quotes. In some instances, for securities that are not widely traded, market quotes for comparable securities were used. Loans The loan portfolio includes adjustable and ﬁxed-rate loans, the fair value of which was estimated using discounted cash ﬂow analyses and other valuation techniques. To calculate discounted cash ﬂows, the loans were aggregated into pools of similar types and expected repayment terms. The expected cash ﬂows of loans considered historical prepayment experiences and estimated credit losses for nonperforming loans and were discounted using current rates offered to borrowers of similar credit characteristics. The fair value of adjustable rate loans is assumed to be equal to their par value. Deposit Liabilities The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is equal to the amount payable on demand at year-end. The fair value of ﬁxed-rate certiﬁcates of deposit was estimated by discounting the contractual cash ﬂow using the discount rates implied by high-grade corporate bond yield curves. Short-term Borrowings Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term funds borrowed are at ﬂoating rates or have short-term maturities. Their par value is assumed to approximate their fair value. Long-term Debt The estimated fair value of medium-term notes, bank notes, and subordinated debt was determined by using discounted cash ﬂow analysis based on high-grade corporate bond yield curves. Floating rate debt is assumed to be equal to par value. Capital trust and other long-term debt instruments were valued using market quotes. Interest Rate Swaps, Equity Contracts and Options The interest rate options and swap cash ﬂows were estimated using a third-party pricing model and discounted based on appropriate LIBOR, eurodollar futures, swap, treasury note yield curves and equity market prices. Loan Commitments, Letters of Credit and Guarantees The fair value of commitments, letters of credit and guarantees represents the estimated costs to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with a third-party. Residential mortgage commitments are actively traded and the fair value is estimated using available market quotes. Other loan commitments, letters of credit and guarantees are not actively traded. Substantially all loan commitments have ﬂoating rates and do not expose the Company to interest rate risk assuming no premium or discount was ascribed to loan commitments because funding could occur at market rates. The Company estimates the fair value of loan commitments, letters of credit and guarantees based on the related amount of unamortized deferred commitment fees adjusted for the probable losses for these arrangements. The estimated fair values of the Company’s ﬁnancial instruments at December 31 are shown in the table below. (Dollars in Millions) Financial Assets 2005 2004 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Cash and cash equivalents ************************************************************* Investment securities ****************************************************************** Loans held for sale ******************************************************************** Loans ******************************************************************************* $ 8,202 39,768 1,686 135,765 $ 8,202 39,772 1,686 134,614 $ 6,537 41,481 1,439 124,235 $ 6,537 41,486 1,439 124,611 Total ﬁnancial assets**************************************************************** 185,421 $184,274 173,692 $174,073 Nonﬁnancial assets ************************************************************* 24,044 Total assets ***************************************************************** $209,465 21,412 $195,104 Financial Liabilities Deposits ***************************************************************************** Short-term borrowings ***************************************************************** Long-term debt *********************************************************************** $124,709 20,200 37,069 $124,532 20,201 37,114 $120,741 13,084 34,739 $120,788 13,084 35,160 Total ﬁnancial liabilities ************************************************************** 181,978 $181,847 168,564 $169,032 Nonﬁnancial liabilities ************************************************************ Shareholders’ equity ************************************************************ 7,401 20,086 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity ***************************************** $209,465 7,001 19,539 $195,104 Derivative Positions Asset and liability management positions Interest rate swaps ***************************************************************** Futures and forwards *************************************************************** Foreign exchange contracts ********************************************************* Options*************************************************************************** Equity contracts ******************************************************************* $ Customer related positions Interest rate contracts ************************************************************** Foreign exchange contracts ********************************************************* $ 57 (15) 18 3 3 53 4 $ 57 (15) 18 3 3 53 4 $ 435 (4) (12) 1 4 36 4 435 (4) (12) 1 4 36 4 The fair value of unfunded commitments, standby letters of credit and other guarantees is approximately equal to their carrying value. The carrying value of unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit was $276 million. The carrying value of other guarantees was $79 million. U.S. BANCORP 95 Note 23 G U A R A N T E E S A N D C O N T I N G E N T L I A B I L I T I E S C O M M I T M E N T S T O E X T E N D C R E D I T Commitments to extend credit are legally binding and generally have ﬁxed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The contractual amount represents the Company’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of default by the borrower. The Company manages this credit risk by using the same credit policies it applies to loans. Collateral is obtained to secure commitments based on management’s credit assessment of the borrower. The collateral may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the Company expects many of the commitments to expire without being drawn, total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent the Company’s future liquidity requirements. In addition, the commitments include consumer credit lines that are cancelable upon notiﬁcation to the consumer. L E T T E R S O F C R E D I T Standby letters of credit are commitments the Company issues to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. The guarantees frequently support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper issuances, bond financings and other similar transactions. The Company issues commercial letters of credit on behalf of customers to ensure payment or collection in connection with trade transactions. In the event of a customer’s nonperformance, the Company’s credit loss exposure is the same as in any extension of credit, up to the letter’s contractual amount. Management assesses the borrower’s credit to determine the necessary collateral, which may include marketable securities, receivables, inventory, equipment and real estate. Since the conditions requiring the Company to fund letters of credit may not occur, the Company expects its liquidity requirements to be less than the total outstanding commitments. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under standby letter of credit arrangements at December 31, 2005, were approximately $10.7 billion with a weighted-average term of approximately 23 months. The estimated fair value of standby letters of credit was approximately $82 million at December 31, 2005. 96 U.S. BANCORP The contract or notional amounts of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit at December 31, 2005, were as follows: (Dollars in Millions) Commitments to extend credit Commercial***************** Corporate and purchasing cards ******************* Consumer credit cards ******* Other consumer ************* Letters of credit Standby******************** Commercial***************** Less Than One Year After One Year Total $19,493 $37,973 $ 57,466 11,730 41,040 3,439 5,212 242 25 — 12,512 5,531 74 11,755 41,040 15,951 10,743 316 L E A S E C O M M I T M E N T S Rental expense for operating leases amounted to $192 million in 2005, $187 million in 2004 and $208 million in 2003. Future minimum payments, net of sublease rentals, under capitalized leases and noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, consisted of the following at December 31, 2005: (Dollars in Millions) 2006 **************************** 2007 **************************** 2008 **************************** 2009 **************************** 2010 **************************** Thereafter ************************ Total minimum lease payments ****** Less amount representing interest *** Present value of net minimum lease payments ********************* G U A R A N T E E S Capitalized Leases Operating Leases $ 171 159 140 122 105 461 $1,158 $ 5 4 3 3 3 12 30 21 $ 9 Guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company to customers or other third-parties. The Company’s guarantees primarily include parent guarantees related to subsidiaries’ third-party borrowing arrangements; third-party performance guarantees inherent in the Company’s business operations such as indemniﬁed securities lending programs and merchant charge-back guarantees; indemniﬁcation or buy-back provisions related to certain asset sales; and contingent consideration arrangements related to acquisitions. For certain guarantees, the Company has recorded a liability related to the potential obligation, or has access to collateral to support the guarantee or through the exercise of other recourse provisions can offset some or all of the maximum potential future payments made under these guarantees. Third-Party Borrowing Arrangements The Company provides guarantees to third-parties as a part of certain subsidiaries’ borrowing arrangements, primarily representing guaranteed operating or capital lease payments or other debt obligations with maturity dates extending through 2013. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $466 million at December 31, 2005. The Company’s recorded liabilities as of December 31, 2005, included $8 million representing outstanding amounts owed to these third-parties and required to be recorded on the Company’s balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Commitments from Securities Lending The Company participates in securities lending activities by acting as the customer’s agent involving the loan of securities. The Company indemniﬁes customers for the difference between the market value of the securities lent and the market value of the collateral received. Cash collateralizes these transactions. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $13.0 billion at December 31, 2005, and represented the market value of the securities lent to third- parties. At December 31, 2005, the Company held assets with a market value of $13.4 billion as collateral for these arrangements. Asset Sales The Company has provided guarantees to certain third-parties in connection with the sale of certain assets, primarily loan portfolios and low-income housing tax credits. These guarantees are generally in the form of asset buy-back or make-whole provisions that are triggered upon a credit event or a change in the tax-qualifying status of the related projects, as applicable, and remain in effect until the loans are collected or ﬁnal tax credits are realized, respectively. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $843 million at December 31, 2005, and represented the proceeds or guaranteed portion received from the buyer in these transactions where the buy-back or make-whole provisions have not yet expired. Recourse available to the Company includes guarantees from the Small Business Administration (for SBA loans sold), recourse against the correspondent that originated the loan or to the private mortgage issuer, the right to collect payments from the debtors, and/or the right to liquidate the underlying collateral, if any, and retain the proceeds. Based on its established loan-to-value guidelines, the Company believes the recourse available is sufﬁcient to recover future payments, if any, under the loan buy-back guarantees. Merchant Processing The Company, through its subsidiaries NOVA Information Systems, Inc. and NOVA European Holdings Company, provides merchant processing services. Under the rules of credit card associations, a merchant processor retains a contingent liability for credit card transactions processed. This contingent liability arises in the event of a billing dispute between the merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder’s favor. In this situation, the transaction is ‘‘charged back’’ to the merchant and the disputed amount is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If the Company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder. A cardholder, through its issuing bank, generally has until the latter of up to four months after the date the transaction is processed or the receipt of the product or service to present a charge-back to the Company as the merchant processor. The absolute maximum potential liability is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the associations’ requirements to be valid charge-back transactions at any given time. Management estimates that the maximum potential exposure for charge-backs would approximate the total amount of merchant transactions processed through the credit card associations for the last four months. For the last four months this amount totaled approximately $49.0 billion. In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. However, where the product or service is not provided until a future date (‘‘future delivery’’), the potential for this contingent liability increases. To mitigate this risk, the Company may require the merchant to make an escrow deposit, may place maximum volume limitations on future delivery transactions processed by the merchant at any point in time, or may require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). Also, merchant processing contracts may include event triggers to provide the Company more ﬁnancial and operational control in the event of ﬁnancial deterioration of the merchant. The Company’s primary exposure to future delivery is related to merchant processing for the airline industry. The Company currently processes card transactions for various airlines in the United States and Europe. In the event of liquidation of these airlines, the Company could become ﬁnancially liable for refunding tickets purchased through the credit card associations under the charge-back provisions. Charge-back risk related to an airline is evaluated in a manner similar to credit risk assessments and as such merchant processing contracts consider the potential risk of default. Under certain situations, the Company may obtain various forms of collateral to minimize the risk of charge- backs. At December 31, 2005, the value of airline tickets purchased to be delivered at a future date was U.S. BANCORP 97 approximately $1.7 billion, and the Company held collateral of $1.2 billion in escrow deposits, letters of credit and liens on various assets. With respect to future delivery risk for non-airline merchants, the Company held $33 million of merchant escrow deposits as collateral. In addition to speciﬁc collateral or other credit enhancements, the Company maintains a liability for its implied guarantees associated with future delivery. At December 31, 2005, the liability was $24 million primarily related to these airline processing arrangements. In the normal course of business, the Company has unresolved charge-backs that are in process of resolution. The Company assesses the likelihood of its potential liability based on the extent and nature of unresolved charge-backs and its historical loss experience. At December 31, 2005, the Company had a recorded liability for potential losses of $19 million. Contingent Consideration Arrangements The Company has contingent payment obligations related to certain business combination transactions. Payments are guaranteed as long as certain post-acquisition performance-based criteria are met or customer relationships are maintained. At December 31, 2005, the maximum potential future payments required to be made by the Company under these arrangements was approximately $80 million and represented contingent payments related to the acquisition of the Wachovia Corporation’s corporate trust and institutional custody business on December 30, 2005. If required, these contingent payments would be payable within the next 12 months. Minimum Revenue Guarantees In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into revenue share agreements with third party business partners who generate customer referrals or provide marketing or other services related to the generation of revenue. In certain of these agreements, the Company may guarantee that a minimum amount of revenue share payments will be made to the third party over a speciﬁed period of time. For the period ending December 31, 2005, the maximum potential future payments required to be made by the Company under these agreements was $42 million. Other Guarantees The Company provides liquidity and credit enhancement facilities to a Company-sponsored conduit, as more fully described in the ‘‘Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements’’ section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Although management believes a draw against these facilities is remote, the maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $3.8 billion at December 31, 2005. The recorded fair value of the Company’s liability for the credit enhancement liquidity facility was $20 million at December 31, 2005, and was included in other liabilities. The Company has also made ﬁnancial performance guarantees related to the operations of its subsidiaries. The maximum potential future payments guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements were approximately $1.8 billion at December 31, 2005. O T H E R C O N T I N G E N T L I A B I L I T I E S In connection with the spin-off of Piper Jaffray Companies, the Company has agreed to indemnify Piper Jaffray Companies against losses that may result from third-party claims relating to certain speciﬁed matters. The Company’s indemniﬁcation obligation related to these speciﬁed matters is capped at $18 million and can be terminated by the Company if there is a change in control event for Piper Jaffray Companies. Through December 31, 2005, the Company has paid approximately $4 million to Piper Jaffray Companies under this agreement. The Company is subject to various other litigation, investigations and legal and administrative cases and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its businesses. Due to their complex nature, it may be years before some matters are resolved. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate resolution or range of ﬁnancial liability with respect to these contingent matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities will not have a material adverse effect on the ﬁnancial condition, results of operations or cash ﬂows of the Company. 98 U.S. BANCORP Note 24 U . S . B A N C O R P ( PA R E N T C O M PA N Y ) Condensed Balance Sheet December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 Assets Deposits with subsidiary banks, principally interest-bearing ***************************************************** Available-for-sale securities ********************************************************************************* Investments in bank and bank holding company subsidiaries *************************************************** Investments in nonbank subsidiaries ************************************************************************* Advances to nonbank subsidiaries ************************************************************************** Other assets ********************************************************************************************* $ 9,882 107 21,681 376 10 659 Total assets**************************************************************************************** $32,715 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Short-term funds borrowed********************************************************************************* Long-term debt******************************************************************************************* Other liabilities ******************************************************************************************** Shareholders’ equity*************************************************************************************** $ 782 10,854 993 20,086 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity **************************************************************** $32,715 $ 6,806 126 20,082 371 5 690 $28,080 $ 683 6,899 959 19,539 $28,080 Condensed Statement of Income Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 Income Dividends from bank and bank holding company subsidiaries *************************************** Dividends from nonbank subsidiaries************************************************************* Interest from subsidiaries *********************************************************************** Other income ********************************************************************************* $2,609 — 200 22 Total income *************************************************************************** 2,831 Expense Interest on short-term funds borrowed *********************************************************** Interest on long-term debt ********************************************************************** Other expense ******************************************************************************** Total expense ************************************************************************** Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries ******************* Income tax credit ***************************************************************************** Income (loss) of parent company **************************************************************** Equity (deﬁciency) in undistributed income of subsidiaries ******************************************* 25 311 93 429 2,402 (73) 2,475 2,014 $4,900 229 54 21 5,204 8 256 47 311 4,893 (53) 4,946 (779) $ 27 6 69 62 164 8 271 89 368 (204) (37) (167) 3,900 Net income **************************************************************************** $4,489 $4,167 $3,733 U.S. BANCORP 99 Condensed Statement of Cash Flows Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 Operating Activities Net income ********************************************************************************** Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities $ 4,489 $ 4,167 $ 3,733 (Equity) deﬁciency in undistributed income of subsidiaries *************************************** Other, net ******************************************************************************** (2,014) 128 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ****************************************** 2,603 Investing Activities Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities **************************************** Purchases of investment securities ************************************************************** Investments in subsidiaries ********************************************************************* Equity distributions from subsidiaries ************************************************************ Net (increase) decrease in short-term advances to subsidiaries************************************** Principal collected on long-term advances to subsidiaries ****************************************** Other, net *********************************************************************************** Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities******************************************* Financing Activities Net increase (decrease) in short-term advances from subsidiaries *********************************** Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings ************************************************* Principal payments or redemptions of long-term debt ********************************************** Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt ******************************************************* Proceeds from issuance of common stock ******************************************************* Repurchase of common stock****************************************************************** Cash dividends paid ************************************************************************** Net cash provided by (used in) ﬁnancing activities******************************************* Change in cash and cash equivalents ***************************************************** Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ************************************************** 13 — (43) 39 (5) — (18) (14) — 99 (1,862) 5,979 371 (1,855) (2,245) 487 3,076 6,806 779 43 4,989 76 (76) — 1,916 11 — (12) 1,915 — (16) (909) — 581 (2,660) (1,820) (4,824) 2,080 4,726 (3,900) 172 5 21 (73) (284) 536 35 573 131 939 (117) 319 (1,954) 1,150 398 (326) (1,557) (2,087) (1,143) 5,869 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ************************************************* $ 9,882 $ 6,806 $ 4,726 Transfer of funds (dividends, loans or advances) from bank subsidiaries to the Company is restricted. Federal law prohibits loans unless they are secured and generally limits any loan to the Company or individual afﬁliate to 10 percent of each bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. In aggregate, loans to the Company and all afﬁliates cannot exceed 20 percent of each bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Dividend payments to the Company by its subsidiary banks are subject to regulatory review and statutory limitations and, in some instances, regulatory approval. The approval of the Comptroller of the Currency is required if total dividends by a national bank in any calendar year exceed the bank’s net income for that year combined with its retained net income for the preceding two calendar years or if the bank’s retained earnings are less than zero. Furthermore, dividends are restricted by the Comptroller of the Currency’s minimum capital constraints for all national banks. Within these guidelines, all bank subsidiaries have the ability to pay dividends without prior regulatory approval. The amount of dividends available to the parent company from the bank subsidiaries at December 31, 2005, was approximately $1.0 billion. 100 U.S. BANCORP Report of Management Responsibility for the ﬁnancial statements and other information presented throughout the Annual Report on Form 10-K rests with the management of U.S. Bancorp. The Company believes that the consolidated ﬁnancial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and present the substance of transactions based on the circumstances and management’s best estimates and judgment. In meeting its responsibilities for the reliability of the ﬁnancial statements, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as deﬁned by Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s system of internal controls is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of publicly ﬁled ﬁnancial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. To test compliance, the Company carries out an extensive audit program. This program includes a review for compliance with written policies and procedures and a comprehensive review of the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system. Although control procedures are designed and tested, it must be recognized that there are limits inherent in all systems of internal control and, therefore, errors and irregularities may nevertheless occur. Also, estimates and judgments are required to assess and balance the relative cost and expected beneﬁts of the controls. Projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The Board of Directors of the Company has an Audit Committee composed of directors who are independent of U.S. Bancorp. The committee meets periodically with management, the internal auditors and the independent accountants to consider audit results and to discuss internal accounting control, auditing and ﬁnancial reporting matters. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company designed and maintained effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005. The Company’s independent accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, have been engaged to render an independent professional opinion on the ﬁnancial statements and issue an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s system of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Their opinion on the ﬁnancial statements appearing on page 102 and their attestation on the system of internal controls over ﬁnancial reporting appearing on page 103 are based on procedures conducted in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). U.S. BANCORP 101 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements The Board of Directors and Shareholders of U.S. Bancorp: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Bancorp as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These ﬁnancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these ﬁnancial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated ﬁnancial position of U.S. Bancorp at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash ﬂows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of U.S. Bancorp’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2006 expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion thereon. Minneapolis, Minnesota February 17, 2006 102 U.S. BANCORP Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Board of Directors and Shareholders of U.S. Bancorp: We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management, that U.S. Bancorp maintained effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). U.S. Bancorp’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reﬂect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of ﬁnancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the ﬁnancial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over ﬁnancial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, management’s assessment that U.S. Bancorp maintained effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, U.S. Bancorp maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of U.S. Bancorp as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash ﬂows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and our report dated February 17, 2006 expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion thereon. Minneapolis, Minnesota February 17, 2006 U.S. BANCORP 103 U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET — FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 % Change 2005 v 2004 Assets Cash and due from banks *********************************** Held-to-maturity securities************************************ Available-for-sale securities *********************************** Loans held for sale ****************************************** Loans ***************************************************** Less allowance for loan losses***************************** Net loans *********************************************** Other assets *********************************************** $ 8,004 109 39,659 1,686 137,806 (2,041) 135,765 24,242 $ 6,336 127 41,354 1,439 126,315 (2,080) 124,235 21,613 $ 8,630 152 43,182 1,433 118,235 (2,184) 116,051 20,023 $ 10,758 233 28,255 4,159 116,251 (2,422) 113,829 22,793 $ 9,120 299 26,309 2,820 114,405 (2,457) 111,948 20,894 26.3% (14.2) (4.1) 17.2 9.1 (1.9) 9.3 12.2 Total assets ****************************************** $209,465 $195,104 $189,471 $180,027 $171,390 7.4% Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Deposits Noninterest-bearing ************************************** Interest-bearing****************************************** $ 32,214 92,495 $ 30,756 89,985 $ 32,470 86,582 $ 35,106 80,428 $ 31,212 74,007 Total deposits **************************************** Short-term borrowings *************************************** Long-term debt ********************************************* Other liabilities ********************************************** Total liabilities **************************************** Shareholders’ equity***************************************** 124,709 20,200 37,069 7,401 189,379 20,086 120,741 13,084 34,739 7,001 175,565 19,539 119,052 10,850 33,816 6,511 170,229 19,242 115,534 7,806 31,582 6,669 161,591 18,436 105,219 14,670 28,542 6,214 154,645 16,745 4.7% 2.8 3.3 54.4 6.7 5.7 7.9 2.8 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity ****************** $209,465 $195,104 $189,471 $180,027 $171,390 7.4% 104 U.S. BANCORP U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME — FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY Year Ended December 31 (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 % Change 2005 v 2004 Interest Income Loans***************************************************** Loans held for sale ***************************************** Investment securities**************************************** Other interest income *************************************** $ 8,381 106 1,954 110 Total interest income********************************** 10,551 Interest Expense Deposits ************************************************** Short-term borrowings ************************************** Long-term debt ******************************************** Total interest expense********************************* Net interest income ***************************************** Provision for credit losses************************************ Net interest income after provision for credit losses ************* Noninterest Income Credit and debit card revenue ******************************** Corporate payment products revenue ************************* ATM processing services ************************************ Merchant processing services ******************************** Trust and investment management fees *********************** Deposit service charges ************************************* Treasury management fees ********************************** Commercial products revenue ******************************** Mortgage banking revenue*********************************** Investment products fees and commissions ******************** Securities gains (losses), net ********************************* Other ***************************************************** Total noninterest income ****************************** Noninterest Expense Compensation ********************************************* Employee beneﬁts ****************************************** Net occupancy and equipment ******************************* Professional services **************************************** Marketing and business development ************************* Technology and communications ***************************** Postage, printing and supplies ******************************* Goodwill ************************************************** Other intangibles ******************************************* Debt prepayment ******************************************* Other ***************************************************** Total noninterest expense ***************************** Income from continuing operations before income taxes ********* Applicable income taxes************************************* Income from continuing operations**************************** Income (loss) from discontinued operations (after-tax)************ Cumulative effect of accounting change (after-tax) ************** 1,559 690 1,247 3,496 7,055 666 6,389 713 488 229 770 1,009 928 437 400 432 152 (106) 593 6,045 2,383 431 641 166 235 466 255 — 458 54 774 5,863 6,571 2,082 4,489 — — $7,168 91 1,827 100 9,186 904 263 908 2,075 7,111 669 6,442 649 407 175 675 981 807 467 432 397 156 (105) 478 $7,272 202 1,684 100 9,258 1,097 167 805 2,069 7,189 1,254 5,935 561 361 166 561 954 716 466 401 367 145 245 370 $ 7,743 171 1,484 96 $ 9,414 147 1,296 90 9,494 10,947 1,485 223 972 2,680 6,814 1,349 5,465 517 326 161 567 892 690 417 479 330 133 300 399 2,828 476 1,292 4,596 6,351 2,529 3,822 466 298 153 309 888 645 347 437 234 131 329 432 5,519 5,313 5,211 4,669 2,252 389 631 149 194 430 248 — 550 155 787 5,785 6,176 2,009 4,167 — — 2,177 328 644 143 180 418 246 — 682 — 779 5,597 5,651 1,941 3,710 23 — 2,167 318 659 130 171 392 243 — 553 — 1,107 5,740 4,936 1,708 3,228 (23) (37) 2,037 285 667 116 178 354 242 237 278 7 1,748 6,149 2,342 818 1,524 (45) — Net income ************************************************ $ 4,489 $4,167 $3,733 $ 3,168 $ 1,479 * Not meaningful 16.9% 16.5 7.0 10.0 14.9 72.5 * 37.3 68.5 (.8) (.4) (.8) 9.9 19.9 30.9 14.1 2.9 15.0 (6.4) (7.4) 8.8 (2.6) (1.0) 24.1 9.5 5.8 10.8 1.6 11.4 21.1 8.4 2.8 — (16.7) (65.2) (1.7) 1.3 6.4 3.6 7.7 — — 7.7 U.S. BANCORP 105 U.S. BANCORP QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Data) Interest Income Loans***************************************************** Loans held for sale ***************************************** Investment securities**************************************** Other interest income *************************************** 2005 2004 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $1,911 21 476 27 $2,027 24 486 28 $2,167 30 492 29 $2,276 31 500 26 $1,747 20 469 22 $1,740 27 444 25 $1,803 21 453 26 $1,878 23 461 27 Total interest income ********************************* 2,435 2,565 2,718 2,833 2,258 2,236 2,303 2,389 Interest Expense Deposits ************************************************** Short-term borrowings ************************************** Long-term debt ******************************************** Total interest expense ******************************** 308 112 271 691 361 143 307 811 414 205 317 936 Net interest income ***************************************** Provision for credit losses *********************************** 1,744 172 1,754 144 1,782 145 476 230 352 1,058 1,775 205 227 50 209 486 205 59 200 464 222 74 232 528 250 80 267 597 1,772 235 1,772 204 1,775 166 1,792 64 Net interest income after provision for credit losses ************* 1,572 1,610 1,637 1,570 1,537 1,568 1,609 1,728 Noninterest Income Credit and debit card revenue ******************************** Corporate payment products revenue ************************* ATM processing services ************************************ Merchant processing services ******************************** Trust and investment management fees *********************** Deposit service charges ************************************* Treasury management fees ********************************** Commercial products revenue******************************** Mortgage banking revenue*********************************** Investment products fees and commissions ******************** Securities gains (losses), net ********************************* Other ***************************************************** 154 107 47 178 247 210 107 96 102 39 (59) 154 177 120 57 198 253 234 117 100 110 39 1 135 185 135 64 200 251 246 109 103 111 37 1 134 197 126 61 194 258 238 104 101 109 37 (49) 170 142 95 42 141 249 185 118 110 94 39 — 103 159 103 45 165 251 202 121 108 110 43 (172) 107 164 108 45 188 240 208 118 106 97 37 88 125 184 101 43 181 241 212 110 108 96 37 (21) 143 Total noninterest income ****************************** 1,382 1,541 1,576 1,546 1,318 1,242 1,524 1,435 Noninterest Expense Compensation ********************************************* Employee beneﬁts ****************************************** Net occupancy and equipment ******************************* Professional services **************************************** Marketing and business development ************************* Technology and communications ***************************** Postage, printing and supplies ******************************* Other intangibles ******************************************* Debt prepayment ******************************************* Other ***************************************************** 567 116 154 36 43 106 63 71 — 175 612 108 159 39 67 113 63 181 54 199 603 106 162 44 61 118 64 125 — 190 601 101 166 47 64 129 65 81 — 210 536 100 156 32 35 102 62 226 35 171 573 91 153 35 49 102 60 (47) 2 215 564 100 159 37 61 110 61 210 5 211 579 98 163 45 49 116 65 161 113 190 Total noninterest expense ***************************** 1,331 1,595 1,473 1,464 1,455 1,233 1,518 1,579 Income before income taxes ********************************* Applicable income taxes************************************* 1,623 552 1,556 435 1,740 586 1,652 509 1,400 392 1,577 540 1,615 549 1,584 528 Net income ************************************************ $1,071 $1,121 $1,154 $1,143 $1,008 $1,037 $1,066 $1,056 Earnings per share ***************************************** Diluted earnings per share *********************************** $ .58 $ .57 $ .61 $ .60 $ .63 $ .62 $ .63 $ .62 $ .53 $ .52 $ .55 $ .54 $ .57 $ .56 $ .57 $ .56 106 U.S. BANCORP U.S. BANCORP SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL DATA Earnings Per Share Summary Earnings per share from continuing operations ********************** Discontinued operations****************************************** Cumulative effect of accounting change **************************** Earnings per share ********************************************** Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations **************** Discontinued operations****************************************** Cumulative effect of accounting change **************************** $ $ $ 2005 2.45 — — 2.45 2.42 — — $ $ $ 2004 2.21 — — 2.21 2.18 — — $ $ $ 2003 1.93 .01 — 1.94 1.92 .01 — $ $ $ 2002 1.68 (.01) (.02) 1.65 1.68 (.01) (.02) $ $ $ 2001 .79 (.02) — .77 .79 (.03) — Diluted earnings per share **************************************** $ 2.42 $ 2.18 $ 1.93 $ 1.65 $ .76 Ratios Return on average assets **************************************** Return on average equity***************************************** Average total equity to average assets ***************************** Dividends per share to net income per share************************ 2.21% 22.5 9.8 50.2 2.17% 21.4 10.2 46.2 1.99% 19.2 10.3 44.1 1.84% 18.3 10.0 47.3 .89% 9.0 9.9 97.4 Other Statistics (Dollars and Shares in Millions) Common shares outstanding (a) *********************************** Average common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents Earnings per share ******************************************* Diluted earnings per share************************************* Number of shareholders (b) *************************************** Common dividends declared************************************** (a) Deﬁned as total common shares less common stock held in treasury at December 31. (b) Based on number of common stock shareholders of record at December 31. Stock Price Range and Dividends 1,815 1,858 1,923 1,917 1,952 1,831 1,857 69,217 $ 2,246 1,887 1,913 71,492 $ 1,917 1,924 1,936 74,341 $ 1,645 1,916 1,925 74,805 $ 1,488 1,928 1,940 76,395 $ 1,447 First quarter ******************************* Second quarter **************************** Third quarter******************************* Fourth quarter ***************************** 2005 Sales Price 2004 Sales Price High Low $31.36 29.91 30.91 31.21 $28.17 26.80 27.77 27.32 Closing Price $28.82 29.20 28.08 29.89 Dividends Declared $.300 .300 .300 .330 High Low $29.70 28.65 30.00 31.65 $26.41 24.89 27.42 27.52 Closing Price $27.65 27.56 28.90 31.32 Dividends Declared $.240 .240 .240 .300 The common stock of U.S. Bancorp is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, under the ticker symbol ‘‘USB.’’ U.S. BANCORP 107 U.S. BANCORP CONSOLIDATED DAILY AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND Year Ended December 31 2005 2004 (Dollars in Millions) Average Balances Interest Yields and Rates Average Balances Interest Yields and Rates $ 42,103 1,795 $ 1,962 106 4.66% 5.88 $ 43,009 1,608 $1,836 91 4.27% 5.69 Assets Investment securities********************************************* Loans held for sale ********************************************** Loans (b) Commercial ************************************************* Commercial real estate**************************************** Residential mortgages **************************************** Retail ******************************************************* Total loans ******************************************** Other earning assets********************************************* Total earning assets ************************************ Allowance for credit losses**************************************** Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities****************** Other assets (c) ************************************************* 2,501 1,804 1,001 3,100 8,406 110 10,584 42,641 27,964 18,036 44,464 133,105 1,422 178,425 (2,098) (368) 27,239 Total assets ******************************************* $203,198 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Noninterest-bearing deposits ************************************** Interest-bearing deposits $ 29,229 Interest checking ********************************************* Money market savings **************************************** Savings accounts ******************************************** Time certiﬁcates of deposit less than $100,000******************* Time deposits greater than $100,000 *************************** Total interest-bearing deposits *************************** Short-term borrowings ******************************************* Long-term debt ************************************************* 22,785 29,314 5,819 13,199 20,655 91,772 19,382 36,141 Total interest-bearing liabilities******************************* Other liabilities (d)************************************************ Shareholders’ equity ********************************************* 147,295 6,721 19,953 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity ******************* $203,198 135 358 15 389 662 1,559 690 1,247 3,496 5.87 6.45 5.55 6.97 6.32 7.77 5.93 .59 1.22 .26 2.95 3.20 1.70 3.56 3.45 2.37 2,213 1,543 812 2,620 7,188 100 9,215 71 235 15 341 242 904 263 908 2,075 39,348 27,267 14,322 41,204 122,141 1,365 168,123 (2,303) (346) 26,119 $191,593 $ 29,816 20,933 32,854 5,866 13,074 13,679 86,406 14,534 35,115 136,055 6,263 19,459 $191,593 Net interest income ********************************************** $ 7,088 $7,140 Gross interest margin ******************************************** Gross interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments *********** Percent of Earning Assets Interest income ************************************************* Interest expense************************************************* Net interest margin ********************************************** Net interest margin without taxable-equivalent increments ************* 3.56% 3.54 5.93% 1.96 3.97% 3.95% (a) Interest and rates are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis under a tax rate of 35 percent. (b) Interest income and rates on loans include loan fees. Nonaccrual loans are included in average loan balances. (c) Includes approximately $1,427 million, $1,733 million, and $1,664 million of earning assets from discontinued operations in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. (d) Includes approximately $1,034 million, $1,524 million, and $1,776 million of interest-bearing liabilities from discontinued operations in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. 108 U.S. BANCORP 5.62 5.66 5.67 6.36 5.89 7.33 5.48 .34 .72 .26 2.61 1.77 1.05 1.81 2.59 1.53 3.95% 3.93 5.48% 1.23 4.25% 4.23% RELATED YIELDS AND RATES (a) 2003 2002 2001 Average Balances Interest Yields and Rates Average Balances Interest Yields and Rates Average Balances Interest Yields and Rates 2005 v 2004 % Change Average Balances $ 37,248 3,616 $1,697 202 4.56% 5.59 $ 28,829 2,644 $1,504 171 5.22% 6.45 $ 21,916 1,911 $ 1,335 147 6.09% 7.69 (2.1)% 11.6 2,315 1,585 713 2,674 7,287 100 9,286 84 318 21 451 223 1,097 167 805 2,069 41,326 27,142 11,696 38,198 118,362 1,582 160,808 (2,467) 120 29,169 $187,630 $ 31,715 19,104 32,310 5,612 15,493 12,319 84,838 10,503 33,663 129,004 7,518 19,393 $187,630 2,622 1,636 595 2,903 7,756 96 9,527 102 313 25 743 302 1,485 223 972 2,680 5.60 5.84 6.10 7.00 6.16 6.32 5.77 .44 .98 .38 2.91 1.81 1.29 1.59 2.39 1.60 43,817 25,723 8,412 36,501 114,453 1,484 147,410 (2,542) 409 26,671 $171,948 $ 28,715 15,631 25,237 4,928 19,283 11,330 76,409 10,116 32,172 118,697 7,263 17,273 $171,948 5.98 6.36 7.08 7.95 6.78 6.48 6.46 .65 1.24 .51 3.86 2.66 1.94 2.20 3.02 2.26 3,609 2,003 658 3,158 9,428 91 11,001 204 711 42 1,241 630 2,828 476 1,292 4,596 50,072 26,081 8,576 33,448 118,177 1,497 143,501 (1,979) 165 24,257 $165,944 $ 25,109 13,962 24,932 4,571 23,328 13,054 79,847 11,679 26,088 117,614 6,795 16,426 $165,944 $7,217 $6,847 $ 6,405 4.17% 4.15 5.77% 1.28 4.49% 4.47% 4.20% 4.18 6.46% 1.81 4.65% 4.63% 8.4 2.6 25.9 7.9 9.0 4.2 6.1 8.9 (6.4) 4.3 6.1 (2.0) 8.8 (10.8) (.8) 1.0 51.0 6.2 33.4 2.9 8.3 7.3 2.5 6.1% 7.21 7.68 7.67 9.44 7.98 6.05 7.67 1.46 2.85 .93 5.32 4.82 3.54 4.07 4.95 3.91 3.76% 3.72 7.67% 3.21 4.46% 4.43% U.S. BANCORP 109 Annual Report on Form 10-K United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2005 Commission File Number 1-6880 U.S. Bancorp Incorporated in the State of Delaware IRS Employer Identiﬁcation #41-0255900 Address: 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-7014 Telephone: (651) 466-3000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act (and listed on the New York Stock Exchange): Common Stock, par value $.01. Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None. U.S. Bancorp is a well-known seasoned issuer, as deﬁned by Rule 405 of the Securities Act, U.S. Bancorp is required to ﬁle reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. U.S. Bancorp (1) has ﬁled all reports required to be ﬁled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such ﬁling requirements for the past 90 days. Disclosure of delinquent ﬁlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is contained in this Form 10-K and in the registrant’s deﬁnitive proxy statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. information under the caption ‘Safe Harbor’ statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are incorporated in the Form 10-K. Index Part I Item 1 Page Business General Business Description ***************20, 111-112 Line of Business Financial Performance *********** 52-57 Website Access to SEC Reports ******************** 116 Item 1A Risk Factors ********************************** 112-116 Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments *********************** none Item 2 Properties **************************************** 116 Item 3 Legal Proceedings ******************************* none Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ****************************** none Part II Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities ********3, 49-50, 64, 83-85, 90-91, 107, 110 Item 6 Selected Financial Data***************************** 19 Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*** 18-60 Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ********************************* 42-49 Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data **** 62-109 Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ********* none Item 9A Controls and Procedures************************* 59-60 Item 9B Other Information ******************************** none U.S. Bancorp is a larger accelerated ﬁler, as deﬁned by Part III Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Item 10 Directors and Executive Ofﬁcers of the Registrant******** * U.S. Bancorp is not a shell company, as deﬁned by Item 11 Executive Compensation ****************************** * Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-afﬁliates as of June 30, 2005, was approximately $53.4 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. As of February 27, 2006, U.S. Bancorp had 1,800,880,986 shares of common stock outstanding and 68,868 registered holders of its common stock. This report incorporates into a single document the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to annual reports on Form 10-K and annual reports to shareholders. Only those sections of this report referenced in the following cross-reference index and the Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters ****************************************** * Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ********* * Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services **************** * Part IV Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules****** 117-119 Signatures************************************************* 120 Certiﬁcations********************************************* 121-123 * U.S. Bancorp’s deﬁnitive proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference, other than the sections entitled ‘‘Report of the Compensation Committee’’ and ‘‘Stock Performance Chart.’’ 110 U.S. BANCORP General Business Description U.S. Bancorp is a multi-state ﬁnancial holding company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. U.S. Bancorp was incorporated in Delaware in 1929 and operates as a ﬁnancial holding company and a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. U.S. Bancorp provides a full range of ﬁnancial services, including lending and depository services, cash management, foreign exchange and trust and investment management services. It also engages in credit card services, merchant and automated teller machine (‘‘ATM’’) processing, mortgage banking, insurance, brokerage and leasing. U.S. Bancorp’s banking subsidiaries are engaged in the general banking business, principally in domestic markets. The subsidiaries range in size from $35 million to $136 billion in deposits and provide a wide range of products and services to individuals, businesses, institutional organizations, governmental entities and other ﬁnancial institutions. Commercial and consumer lending services are principally offered to customers within the Company’s domestic markets, to domestic customers with foreign operations and within certain niche national venues. Lending services include traditional credit products as well as credit card services, ﬁnancing and import/export trade, asset-backed lending, agricultural ﬁnance and other products. Leasing products are offered through bank leasing subsidiaries. Depository services include checking accounts, savings accounts and time certiﬁcate contracts. Ancillary services such as foreign exchange, treasury management and receivable lock-box collection are provided to corporate customers. U.S. Bancorp’s bank and trust subsidiaries provide a full range of asset management and ﬁduciary services for individuals, estates, foundations, business corporations and charitable organizations. U.S. Bancorp’s non-banking subsidiaries primarily offer investment and insurance products to the Company’s customers principally within its markets and mutual fund processing services to a broad range of mutual funds. Banking and investment services are provided through a network of 2,419 banking ofﬁces principally operating in 24 states in the Midwest and West. The Company operates a network of 5,003 branded ATMs and provides 24-hour, seven day a week telephone customer service. Mortgage banking services are provided through banking ofﬁces and loan production ofﬁces throughout the Company’s markets. Consumer lending products may be originated through banking ofﬁces, indirect correspondents, brokers or other lending sources, and a consumer ﬁnance division. The Company is also one of the largest providers of Visa˛ corporate and purchasing card services and corporate trust services in the United States. A wholly-owned subsidiary, NOVA Information Systems, Inc. (‘‘NOVA’’), provides merchant processing services directly to merchants and through a network of banking afﬁliations. Afﬁliates of NOVA provide similar merchant services in Canada and segments of Europe. These foreign operations are not signiﬁcant to the Company. On a full-time equivalent basis, as of December 31, 2005, U.S. Bancorp employed 49,684 people. Competition The commercial banking business is highly competitive. Subsidiary banks compete with other commercial banks and with other ﬁnancial institutions, including savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, ﬁnance companies, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and investment companies. In recent years, competition has increased from institutions not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and bank holding companies. Government Policies The operations of the Company’s various operating units are affected by state and federal legislative changes and by policies of various regulatory authorities, including those of the numerous states in which they operate, the United States and foreign governments. These policies include, for example, statutory maximum legal lending rates, domestic monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, United States ﬁscal policy, international currency regulations and monetary policies, U.S. Patriot Act and capital adequacy and liquidity constraints imposed by bank regulatory agencies. Supervision and Regulation As a registered bank holding company and ﬁnancial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act, U.S. Bancorp is subject to the supervision of, and regulation by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a ﬁnancial holding company may engage in banking, managing or controlling banks, furnishing or performing services for banks it controls, and conducting other ﬁnancial activities. U.S. Bancorp must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of another bank or bank holding company, and must provide notice to, and in some situations obtain the prior approval of, the Federal Reserve Board in connection with engaging in, or acquiring more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of a company engaged in, a new ﬁnancial activity. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, U.S. Bancorp may acquire banks throughout the United States, subject only to state or federal deposit caps and state minimum age requirements. National banks are subject to the supervision of, and are examined by, the Comptroller of the Currency. All subsidiary banks of the Company are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and are subject to U.S. BANCORP 111 examination by the FDIC. In practice, the primary federal regulator makes regular examinations of each subsidiary bank subject to its regulatory review or participates in joint examinations with other federal regulators. Areas subject to regulation by federal authorities include the allowance for credit losses, investments, loans, mergers, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches and other aspects of operations. Risk Factors There are a number of factors, including those specified below, that may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial results or stock price. Additional risks that the Company currently does not know about or currently views as immaterial may also impair the Company’s business or adversely impact its financial results or stock price. Industry Risk Factors The Company’s business and ﬁnancial results are signiﬁcantly affected by general business and economic conditions. The Company’s business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States economy and the local economies in which the Company operates. For example, an economic downturn, an increase in unemployment, or other events that affect household and/or corporate incomes could result in a deterioration of credit quality, a change in the allowance for credit losses, or reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services. Changes in the financial performance and condition of the Company’s borrowers could negatively affect repayment of those borrowers’ loans. In addition, changes in securities market conditions and monetary fluctuations could adversely affect the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet the Company’s liquidity needs. Changes in the domestic interest rate environment could reduce the Company’s net interest income. The operations of ﬁnancial institutions such as the Company are dependent to a large degree on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. An institution’s net interest income is signiﬁcantly affected by market rates of interest, which in turn are affected by prevailing economic conditions, by the ﬁscal and monetary policies of the federal government and by the policies of various regulatory agencies. Like all ﬁnancial institutions, the Company’s balance sheet is affected by ﬂuctuations in interest rates. Volatility in interest rates can also result in the ﬂow of funds away from ﬁnancial institutions into direct investments. Direct investments, such as U.S. Government and corporate securities and other investment vehicles (including mutual 112 U.S. BANCORP funds) generally pay higher rates of return than ﬁnancial institutions, because of the absence of federal insurance premiums and reserve requirements. Changes in the laws, regulations and policies governing ﬁnancial services companies could alter the Company’s business environment and adversely affect operations. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its ﬁscal and monetary policies determine in a large part the Company’s cost of funds for lending and investing and the return that can be earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect the Company’s net interest margin. Federal Reserve Board policies can also materially affect the value of ﬁnancial instruments that the Company holds, such as debt securities and mortgage servicing rights. The Company and its bank subsidiaries are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes in statutes, regulations or policies could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways, including limiting the types of ﬁnancial services and products that the Company offers and/or increasing the ability of non-banks to offer competing ﬁnancial services and products. The Company cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it or any regulations would have on the Company’s ﬁnancial condition or results of operations. The ﬁnancial services industry is highly competitive, and competitive pressures could intensify and adversely affect the Company’s ﬁnancial results. The Company operates in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. The Company competes with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, ﬁnance companies, mortgage banking companies, credit unions and investment companies. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. Many of the Company’s competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures. Also, the potential need to adapt to industry changes in information technology systems, on which the Company and ﬁnancial services industry are highly dependent, could present operational issues and require capital spending. Changes in consumer use of banks and changes in consumer spending and saving habits could adversely affect the Company’s ﬁnancial results. Technology and other changes now allow many consumers to complete ﬁnancial transactions without using banks. For example, consumers can pay bills and transfer funds directly without going through a bank. This ‘‘disintermediation’’ could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and income generated from those deposits. In addition, changes in consumer spending and saving habits could adversely affect the Company’s operations, and the Company may be unable to timely develop competitive new products and services in response to these changes that are accepted by new and existing customers. Acts or threats of terrorism and political or military actions and revenues from its fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet services, could require the Company to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt the Company’s existing products and services. Also, these and other capital investments in the Company’s businesses may not produce expected growth in earnings anticipated at the time of the expenditure. The Company might not be successful in introducing new products and services, achieving market acceptance of its products and services, or developing and maintaining loyal customers. taken by the United States or other governments could Because the nature of the ﬁnancial services business adversely affect general economic or industry conditions. involves a high volume of transactions, the Company faces Geopolitical conditions may also affect the Company’s earnings. Acts or threats or terrorism and political or military actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to terrorism, or similar activity, could adversely affect general economic or industry conditions. Company Risk Factors The Company’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses. Like all ﬁnancial institutions, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. The Company’s allowance for loan losses is based on its historical loss experience as well as an evaluation of the risks associated with its loan portfolio, including the size and composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and geographic concentrations within the portfolio. The Company’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual loan losses, and future provisions for loan losses could materially and adversely affect its ﬁnancial results. The Company may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices. The Company seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to speciﬁc underwriting practices. These practices often include: analysis of a borrower’s credit history, ﬁnancial statements, tax returns and cash ﬂow projections; valuation of collateral based on reports of independent appraisers; and veriﬁcation of liquid assets. Although the Company believes that its underwriting criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans it makes, the Company may incur losses on loans that meet these criteria. Maintaining or increasing the Company’s market share may depend on lowering prices and market acceptance of new products and services. The Company’s success depends, in part, on its ability to adapt its products and services to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at lower prices. Lower prices can reduce the Company’s net interest margin signiﬁcant operational risks. The Company operates in many different businesses in diverse markets and relies on the ability of its employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from the Company’s operations, including, but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside of the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements and business continuation and disaster recovery. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deﬁciency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, the Company could suffer ﬁnancial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation. The change in residual value of leased assets may have an adverse impact on the Company’s ﬁnancial results. The Company engages in leasing activities and is subject to the risk that the residual value of the property under lease will be less than the Company’s recorded asset value. Adverse changes in the residual value of leased assets can have a negative impact on the Company’s ﬁnancial results. The risk of changes in the realized value of the leased assets compared to recorded residual values depends on many factors outside of the Company’s control, including supply and demand for the assets, collecting insurance claims, condition of the assets at the end of the lease term, and other economic factors. Negative publicity could damage the Company’s reputation and adversely impact its business and ﬁnancial results. Reputation risk, or the risk to the Company’s earnings and capital from negative publicity, is inherent in the Company’s business. Negative publicity can result from the Company’s actual or alleged conduct in any number of U.S. BANCORP 113 activities, including lending practices, corporate governance and acquisitions, and actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative publicity can adversely affect the Company’s ability to keep and attract customers and can expose the Company to litigation and regulatory action. Because most of the Company’s businesses operate under the ‘‘U.S. Bank’’ brand, actual or alleged conduct by one business can result in negative publicity about other businesses the Company operates. Although the Company takes steps to minimize reputation risk in dealing with customers and other constituencies, the Company, as a large diversiﬁed ﬁnancial services company with a high industry proﬁle, is inherently exposed to this risk. The Company’s reported ﬁnancial results depend on management’s selection of accounting methods and certain assumptions and estimates. The Company’s accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how the Company records and reports its ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. The Company’s management must exercise judgment in selecting and applying many of these accounting policies and methods so they comply with GAAP and reﬂect management’s judgment of the most appropriate manner to report the Company’s ﬁnancial condition and results. In some cases, management must select the accounting policy or method to apply from two or more alternatives, any of which might be reasonable under the circumstances yet might result in the Company’s reporting materially different results than would have been reported under a different alternative. the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) changes the ﬁnancial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s ﬁnancial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its ﬁnancial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the Company’s restating prior period ﬁnancial statements. Acquisitions may not produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within timeframes originally anticipated and may result in unforeseen integration difﬁculties. The Company regularly explores opportunities to acquire ﬁnancial services businesses or assets and may also consider opportunities to acquire other banks or ﬁnancial institutions. The Company cannot predict the number, size or timing of acquisitions. Difﬁculty in integrating an acquired business or company may cause the Company not to realize expected revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other projected beneﬁts from the acquisition. The integration could result in higher than expected deposit attrition (run-off), loss of key employees, disruption of the Company’s business or the business of the acquired company, or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated beneﬁts of the acquisition. Also, the negative effect of any divestitures required by regulatory authorities in acquisitions or business combinations may be greater than expected. Certain accounting policies are critical to presenting the The Company must generally receive federal regulatory Company’s ﬁnancial condition and results. They require management to make difﬁcult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are uncertain. Materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions or estimates. These critical accounting policies include: the allowance for credit losses; the valuation of mortgage servicing rights; the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets; and income taxes. Because of the uncertainty of estimates involved in these matters, the Company may be required to do one or more of the following: signiﬁcantly increase the allowance for credit losses and/or sustain credit losses that are signiﬁcantly higher than the reserve provided; recognize signiﬁcant provision for impairment of its mortgage servicing rights; recognize signiﬁcant impairment on its goodwill and other intangible asset balances; or signiﬁcantly increase its accrued taxes liability. For more information, refer to ‘‘Critical Accounting Policies’’ in this Annual Report and Form 10-K. approval before it can acquire a bank or bank holding company. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on the competition, ﬁnancial condition, and future prospects. The regulators also review current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience, and integrity of management and its record of compliance with laws and regulations, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served (including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the Community Reinvestment Act) and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities. In addition, the Company cannot be certain when or if, or on what terms and conditions, any required regulatory approvals will be granted. The Company may be required to sell banks or branches as a condition to receiving regulatory approval. If new laws were enacted that restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to share information about Changes in accounting standards could materially impact customers, the Company’s ﬁnancial results could be the Company’s ﬁnancial statements. From time to time, negatively affected. The Company’s business model 114 U.S. BANCORP depends on sharing information among the family of companies owned by U.S. Bancorp to better satisfy the Company’s customer needs. Laws that restrict the ability of the companies owned by U.S. Bancorp to share information about customers could negatively affect the Company’s revenue and proﬁt. The Company’s business could suffer if the Company fails to attract and retain skilled people. The Company’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities the Company engages in can be intense. The Company may not be able to hire the best people or to keep them. The Company relies on other companies to provide key components of the Company’s business infrastructure. Third party vendors provide key components of the Company’s business infrastructure such as internet connections, network access and mutual fund distribution. While the Company has selected these third party vendors carefully, it does not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including as a result of their not providing the Company their services for any reason or their performing their services poorly, could adversely affect the Company’s ability to deliver products and services to the Company’s customers and otherwise to conduct its business. Replacing these third party vendors could also entail signiﬁcant delay and expense. Signiﬁcant legal actions could subject the Company to substantial uninsured liabilities. The Company is from time to time subject to claims related to its operations. These claims and legal actions, including supervisory actions by the Company’s regulators, could involve large monetary claims and signiﬁcant defense costs. To protect itself from the cost of these claims, the Company maintains insurance coverage in amounts and with deductibles that it believes are appropriate for its operations. However, the Company’s insurance coverage may not cover all claims against the Company or continue to be available to the Company at a reasonable cost. As a result, the Company may be exposed to substantial uninsured liabilities, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and ﬁnancial condition. The Company is exposed to risk of environmental liability when it takes title to properties. In the course of the Company’s business, the Company may foreclose on and take title to real estate. As a result, the Company could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. The Company may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, if the Company is the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, it may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. If the Company becomes subject to signiﬁcant environmental liabilities, its ﬁnancial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. A natural disaster could harm the Company’s business. Natural disasters could harm the Company’s operations directly through interference with communications, including the interruption or loss of the Company’s websites, which would prevent the Company from gathering deposits, originating loans and processing and controlling its ﬂow of business, as well as through the destruction of facilities and the Company’s operational, ﬁnancial and management information systems. The Company faces systems failure risks as well as security risks, including ‘‘hacking’’ and ‘‘identity theft.’’ The computer systems and network infrastructure the Company and others use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. These problems may arise in both our internally developed systems and the systems of our third-party service providers. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect computer equipment against damage from ﬁre, power loss or telecommunication failure. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could adversely affect our business and ﬁnancial results. In addition, our computer systems and network infrastructure present security risks, and could be susceptible to hacking or identity theft. The Company relies on dividends from its subsidiaries for its liquidity needs. The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its bank subsidiaries and non-bank subsidiaries. The Company receives substantially all of its cash from dividends paid by its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the Company’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our bank subsidiaries and certain of our non-bank subsidiaries may pay to the Company. Also, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. The Company has non-banking businesses that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The Company is a diversiﬁed ﬁnancial services company and the Company’s U.S. BANCORP 115 business model is based on a mix of businesses that provide a broad range of products and services delivered through multiple distribution channels. In addition to banking, the Company provides payment services, investments, mortgages and corporate and personal trust services. Although the Company believes its diversity helps lessen the effect of downturns in any one segment of its industry, it also means the Company’s earnings could be subject to various speciﬁc risks and uncertainties related to these non- banking businesses. The Company’s stock price can be volatile. The Company’s stock price can ﬂuctuate widely in response to a variety of factors, including: actual or anticipated variations in the Company’s quarterly operating results; recommendations by securities analysts; signiﬁcant acquisitions or business combinations; strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by or involving the Company or the Company’s competitors; operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to the Company; new technology used or services offered by the Company’s competitors; news reports relating to trends, concerns and other issues in the ﬁnancial services industry, and changes in government regulations. General market ﬂuctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, including terrorist attacks, economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes, credit loss trends or currency ﬂuctuations, could also cause the Company’s stock price to decrease regardless of the Company’s operating results. Properties U.S. Bancorp and its signiﬁcant subsidiaries occupy headquarter ofﬁces under a long-term lease in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Company also leases eight freestanding operations centers in Cincinnati, Denver, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Portland and St. Paul. The Company owns nine principal operations centers in Cincinnati, Coeur d’Alene, Fargo, Milwaukee, Owensboro, Portland, St. Louis and St. Paul. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s subsidiaries owned and operated a total of 1,431 facilities and leased an additional 1,405 facilities, all of which are well maintained. The Company believes its current facilities are adequate to meet its needs. Additional information with respect to premises and equipment is presented in Notes 10 and 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Website Access to SEC Reports U.S. Bancorp’s internet website can be found at usbank.com. U.S. Bancorp makes available free of charge on its website its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports ﬁled or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as well as all other reports ﬁled by U.S. Bancorp with the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically ﬁled with, or furnished to, the SEC. Certiﬁcations We have ﬁled as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K the Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer certiﬁcations required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have also submitted the required annual Chief Executive Ofﬁcer certiﬁcation to the New York Stock Exchange. Governance Documents Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and Board of Directors committee charters are available free of charge on our web site at usbank.com, by clicking on ‘‘About U.S. Bancorp,’’ then ‘‘Corporate Governance.’’ Shareholders may request a free printed copy of any of these documents from our investor relations department by contacting them at investorrelations@usbank.com or calling (866) 775-9668. 116 U.S. BANCORP E N T RY I N T O C E RTA I N C O V E N A N T S E x h i b i t s Simultaneously with the closing of the ICONs Offering, 4.1 USB Capital VIII Replacement Capital Covenant On December 29, 2005, the Company and USB Capital VIII, a Delaware statutory trust and wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp, closed the public offering of $375,000,000 principal amount of 6.35% Trust Preferred Securities (the ‘‘Capital Securities’’), representing preferred beneﬁcial interests in the assets of USB Capital VIII. The proceeds from the sale by USB Capital VIII of the Capital Securities to investors, and its common securities to the Company, were invested by USB Capital VIII in the Company’s 6.35% Income Capital Obligation Notes (the ‘‘ICONs’’), due 2065 (the ‘‘ICONs Offering’’). the Company entered into a replacement capital covenant for the beneﬁt of persons that buy, hold or sell a speciﬁed series of long-term indebtedness of the Company or U.S. Bank National Association (‘‘ICONs Covered Debt’’). We will provide a copy of the ICONs Replacement Capital Covenant to holders of ICONs Covered Debt upon request made to the Investor Relations contact listed inside the back cover of this annual report. The ICONs replacement capital covenant provides that the Company will not redeem or repurchase, and will cause USB Capital VIII not to redeem or repurchase, all or any part of the ICONs or the Capital Securities on or before December 29, 2035, except, with certain limited exceptions, to the extent that, during the 180 days prior to the date of that redemption or repurchase, the Company has received proceeds from the sale of qualifying securities that (i) have equity-like characteristics that are the same as, or more equity-like than, the applicable characteristics of the ICONs at the time of redemption or repurchase and qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company under the capital guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board, and (ii) the Company has obtained prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, if such approval is then required by the Federal Reserve Board. As of the date of this Annual Report, the U.S. Bancorp 4.50% Medium-Term Notes, Series P, CUSIP No. 91159HGJ3, constitutes ICONs Covered Debt whose holders are entitled to the beneﬁts of the ICONS Replacement Capital Covenant. Schedules to the consolidated ﬁnancial statements required by Regulation S-X are omitted since the required information is included in the footnotes or is not applicable. The following Exhibit Index lists the Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K. (1)3.1 Restated Certiﬁcate of Incorporation, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005. (1)3.2 Restated bylaws, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 [Pursuant to Item 601(b) (4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, copies of instruments deﬁning the rights of holders of long-term debt are not ﬁled. U.S. Bancorp agrees to furnish a copy thereof to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.] (1)4.2 Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2002, between U.S. Bancorp and Mellon Investor Services LLC. Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 001-06880) on December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.1 U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (1)(2)10.2 Amendment No. 1 to U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.3 U.S. Bancorp 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.4 Summary of U.S. Bancorp 1991 Executive Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.5 U.S. Bancorp 2001 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.6 (1)(2)10.7 Firstar Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 Firstar Corporation 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 U.S. BANCORP 117 (1)(2)10.8 Star Banc Corporation 1996 Starshare Stock Incentive Plan for Employees. Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.9 U.S. Bancorp Executive Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (1)(2)10.10 U.S. Bancorp Executive Deferral Plan, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (1)(2)10.11 Summary of Nonqualiﬁed Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended, of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (1)(2)10.12 1991 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (1)(2)10.13 Form of Director Indemniﬁcation Agreement entered into with former directors of the former U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (1)(2)10.14 U.S. Bancorp Independent Director Retirement and Death Beneﬁt Plan, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (1)(2)10.15 U.S. Bancorp Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (1)(2)10.16 U.S. Bancorp Non Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (1)(2)10.17 Appendix B-10 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (1)(2)10.18 Amendments No. 1, 2 and 3 to U.S. Bancorp Non-Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (1)(2)10.19 Amendment No. 4 to U.S. Bancorp Non- Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K ﬁled on December 23, 2004 (1)(2)10.20 Amendment No. 5 to U.S. Bancorp Non- Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 118 U.S. BANCORP (1)(2)10.21 Amendment No. 6 to U.S. Bancorp Non- Qualiﬁed Executive Retirement Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K ﬁled on October 20, 2005 (1)(2)10.22 U.S. Bancorp Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (1)(2)10.23 U.S. Bancorp 2005 Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K ﬁled on December 21, 2005 (1)(2)10.24 U.S. Bancorp Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (1)(2)10.25 U.S. Bancorp 2005 Outside Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K ﬁled on December 21, 2005 (1)(2)10.26 Form of Change in Control Agreement, effective November 16, 2001, between U.S. Bancorp and certain executive ofﬁcers of U.S. Bancorp. Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (1)(2)10.27 Form of Executive Ofﬁcer Stock Option Agreement with cliff and performance vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.28 Form of Executive Ofﬁcer Stock Option Agreement with annual vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.29 Form of 2006 Executive Ofﬁcer Stock Option Agreement with annual vesting under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K ﬁled on January 17, 2006 (1)(2)10.30 Form of Executive Ofﬁcer Restricted Stock Award Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.31 Form of Director Stock Option Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.32 Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.33 Form of Executive Ofﬁcer Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under U.S. Bancorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.34 Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (1)(2)10.35 Amendment of Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.36 Amendment No. 2 of Employment Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer. Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.37 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Jerry A. Grundhofer dated January 2, 2002. Filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (1)(2)10.38 Offer of Employment to Richard C. Hartnack. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (2)10.39 Information Regarding the 2006 12 Compensation of the Non-Employee Members of the Board of Directors of U.S. Bancorp Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Subsidiaries of the Registrant 21 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP 31.1 Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Ofﬁcer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 31.2 Certiﬁcation of Chief Financial Ofﬁcer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Certiﬁcation of Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32 (1) Exhibit has previously been ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated herein as an exhibit by reference to the prior ﬁling. (2) Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. U.S. BANCORP 119 Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on March 7, 2006, on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. U.S. Bancorp By: Jerry A. Grundhofer Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on March 7, 2006, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated. Jerry A. Grundhofer Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer (principal executive ofﬁcer) David M. Moffett Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer (principal ﬁnancial ofﬁcer) Terrance R. Dolan Executive Vice President and Controller (principal accounting ofﬁcer) Victoria Buyniski Gluckman Director Arthur D. Collins, Jr. Director Peter H. Coors Director Joel W. Johnson Director Jerry W. Levin Director David B. O’Maley Director O’dell M. Owens, M.D., M.P.H. Director Richard G. Reiten Director Craig D. Schnuck Director Warren R. Staley Director Patrick T. Stokes Director 120 U.S. BANCORP EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Jerry A. Grundhofer, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Bancorp; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the ﬁnancial statements, and other ﬁnancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying ofﬁcers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) designed such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, or caused such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent ﬁscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth ﬁscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting; and (5) The registrant’s other certifying ofﬁcers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all signiﬁcant deﬁciencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report ﬁnancial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a signiﬁcant role in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Dated: March 7, 2006 /s / JERRY A. GRUNDHOFER Jerry A. Grundhofer Chief Executive Ofﬁcer U.S. BANCORP 121 EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, David M. Moffett, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Bancorp; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the ﬁnancial statements, and other ﬁnancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the ﬁnancial condition, results of operations and cash ﬂows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; (4) The registrant’s other certifying ofﬁcers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) designed such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, or caused such internal control over ﬁnancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent ﬁscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth ﬁscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting; and (5) The registrant’s other certifying ofﬁcers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) all signiﬁcant deﬁciencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report ﬁnancial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a signiﬁcant role in the registrant’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. /s / DAVID M. MOFFETT David M. Moffett Chief Financial Ofﬁcer Dated: March 7, 2006 122 U.S. BANCORP EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp, a Delaware corporation (the ‘‘Company’’), do hereby certify that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the ﬁnancial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ JERRY A. GRUNDHOFER Jerry A. Grundhofer Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Dated: March 7, 2006 /s / DAVID M. MOFFETT David M. Moffett Chief Financial Ofﬁcer U.S. BANCORP 123 Executive Officers Jerry A. Grundhofer William L. Chenevich Mr. Grundhofer is Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of U.S. Mr. Chenevich is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Bancorp. Mr. Grundhofer, 61, has served as Chief Executive Mr. Chenevich, 62, has served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation and since the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in U.S. Bancorp in February 2001 and as Chairman since February 2001, when he assumed responsibility for Technology and December 30, 2002. He also served as President from the time of Operations Services. Previously, he served as Vice Chairman of the merger until October 2004. Prior to the merger, Technology and Operations Services of Firstar Corporation from Mr. Grundhofer was President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of 1999 to 2001. Prior to joining Firstar he was Group Executive Vice Firstar Corporation, having served as Chairman, President and President at Visa International from 1994 to 1999. Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Star Banc Corporation from 1993 until its merger with Firstar Corporation in 1998. Jennie P. Carlson Richard K. Davis Mr. Davis is President and Chief Operating Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Davis, 48, has served in these capacities since Ms. Carlson is Executive Vice President of U.S. Bancorp. October 2004. From the time of the merger of Firstar Corporation Ms. Carlson, 45, has served as Executive Vice President, Human and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001 until October 2004, Mr. Davis Resources since January 2002. Until that time, she served as served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. From the time of the Executive Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate merger, Mr. Davis was responsible for Consumer Banking, Secretary of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Firstar Corporation including Retail Payment Solutions (card services), and he assumed and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. From 1995 until the merger, additional responsibility for Commercial Banking in 2003. she was General Counsel and Secretary of Firstar Corporation and Previously, he had been Vice Chairman of Consumer Banking of Star Banc Corporation, a predecessor company, and Executive Vice Firstar Corporation from 1998 until 2001 and Executive Vice President from 1999 to 2001. President, Consumer Banking of Star Banc Corporation from 1993 Andrew Cecere until its merger with Firstar Corporation in 1998. Mr. Cecere is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Cecere, 45, has Michael J. Doyle served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since the merger of Mr. Doyle is Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Ofﬁcer of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. He U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Doyle, 49, has served in these positions since assumed responsibility for Private Client and Trust Services in January 2003. Until that time, he served as Executive Vice February 2001 and U.S. Bancorp Asset Management in November President and Senior Credit Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp since the 2001. Previously, he had served as Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February 2001. U.S. Bancorp from May 2000 through February 2001. From 1999 until the merger, he was Executive Vice President and Additionally, he served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bank with Chief Approval Ofﬁcer of Firstar Corporation. responsibility for Commercial Services from 1999 to 2001, having been a Senior Vice President of Finance since 1992. 124 U.S. BANCORP Richard C. Hartnack Lee R. Mitau Mr. Hartnack is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Hartnack, Mr. Mitau is Executive Vice President and General Counsel of 60, has served in this position since April 2005, when he joined U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Mitau, 57, has served in these positions since U.S. Bancorp to assume responsibility for Consumer Banking. Prior 1995. Mr. Mitau also serves as Corporate Secretary. Prior to 1995 to joining U.S. Bancorp, he served as Vice Chairman of Union Bank he was a partner at the law ﬁrm of Dorsey & Whitney LLP. of California from 1991 to 2005 with responsibility for Community Banking and Investment Services. Richard J. Hidy David M. Moffett Mr. Moffett is Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Moffett, 54, has served in these positions since Mr. Hidy is Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Ofﬁcer of the merger of Firstar Corporation and U.S. Bancorp in February U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Hidy, 43, has served in these positions since 2001. Prior to the merger, he was Vice Chairman and Chief February 2005. From January 2003 until February 2005, he served Financial Ofﬁcer of Firstar Corporation, and had served as Chief as Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Financial Ofﬁcer of Star Banc Corporation from 1993 until its U.S. Bancorp, having served as Senior Vice President and Associate merger with Firstar Corporation in 1998. General Counsel of U.S. Bancorp and Firstar Corporation, a predecessor company, since 1999. Pamela A. Joseph Joseph M. Otting Mr. Otting is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Mr. Otting, 48, has served in this position since April 2005, when he assumed Ms. Joseph is Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp. Ms. Joseph, 46, has responsibility for Commercial Banking and Dealer Services. He served as Vice Chairman of U.S. Bancorp since December 2004. assumed additional responsibility for Commercial Real Estate in Since November 2004, she has been Chairman, and Chief Executive September 2005. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President, Ofﬁcer of NOVA Information Systems, Inc., which became a East Commercial Banking Group of U.S. Bancorp from June 2003 wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp in connection with the to April 2005. He served as Market President of U.S. Bank in acquisition of NOVA Corporation in July 2001. From November Oregon from December 2001 until June 2003. Prior to joining 2004 until July 2005, Ms. Joseph also served as President of U.S. Bancorp in December 2001, he was Executive Vice President NOVA Information Systems, Inc. Prior to that time, she had been and Head of Commercial Banking at Union Bank of California. President and Chief Operating Ofﬁcer of NOVA Information Systems, Inc. since February 2000. She also served as Senior Executive Vice President of Business Development of NOVA Corporation from 2001 to 2004, after serving as its Chief Information Ofﬁcer from 1997 to 2001. U.S. BANCORP 125 Directors Jerry A. Grundhofer1,6 Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer U.S. Bancorp Minneapolis, Minnesota Victoria Buyniski Gluckman4,6 President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer United Medical Resources, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Cincinnati, Ohio Arthur D. Collins, Jr.1,5,6 Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota Peter H. Coors2,4 Vice Chairman Molson Coors Brewing Company Golden, Colorado Joel W. Johnson3,5 Chairman Hormel Foods Corporation Austin, Minnesota Jerry W. Levin2,5 Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer JW Levin Partners LLC New York, New York 1. Executive Committee 2. Compensation Committee 3. Audit Committee 4. Community Outreach and Fair Lending Committee 5. Governance Committee 6. Credit and Finance Committee David B. O’Maley1,2,5 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Ohio National Financial Services, Inc. Cincinnati, Ohio O’dell M. Owens, M.D., M.P.H.3,4 Independent Consultant and Hamilton County Coroner Cincinnati, Ohio Richard G. Reiten3,6 Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Northwest Natural Gas Company Portland, Oregon Craig D. Schnuck3,4 Chairman Schnuck Markets, Inc. St. Louis, Missouri Warren R. Staley1,3,6 Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Cargill, Incorporated Minneapolis, Minnesota Patrick T. Stokes1,2,5 President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. St. Louis, Missouri 126 U.S. BANCORP USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page C Dividends and Reinvestment Plan U.S. Bancorp currently pays quarterly dividends on our common stock on or about the 15th day of January, April, July and October, subject to approval by our Board of Directors. U.S. Bancorp shareholders can choose to participate in a plan that provides automatic reinvestment of dividends and/or optional cash purchase of additional shares of U.S. Bancorp common stock. For more information, please contact our transfer agent, Mellon Investor Services. See above. Investor Relations Contacts Judith T. Murphy Senior Vice President, Investor Relations judith.murphy@usbank.com Phone: 612-303-0783 or 866-775-9668 Financial Information U.S. Bancorp news and ﬁnancial results are available through our website and by mail. Website. For information about U.S. Bancorp, including news, ﬁnancial results, annual reports and other documents ﬁled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, access our home page on the internet at usbank.com, click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Investor/Shareholder Information. Mail. At your request, we will mail to you our quarterly earnings, news releases, quarterly ﬁnancial data reported on Form 10-Q and additional copies of our annual reports. Please contact: U.S. Bancorp Investor Relations 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 investorrelations@usbank.com Phone: 612-303-0799 or 866-775-9668 Media Requests Steven W. Dale Senior Vice President, Media Relations steve.dale@usbank.com Phone: 612-303-0784 Privacy U.S. Bancorp is committed to respecting the privacy of our customers and safeguarding the ﬁnancial and personal information provided to us. To learn more about the U.S. Bancorp commitment to protecting privacy, visit usbank.com and click on Privacy Pledge. Code of Ethics U.S. Bancorp places the highest importance on honesty and integrity. Each year, every U.S. Bancorp employee certiﬁes compliance with the letter and spirit of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, the guiding ethical standards of our organization. For details about our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, visit usbank.com and click on About U.S. Bancorp, then Ethics at U.S. Bank. Diversity U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to developing and maintaining a workplace that reﬂects the diversity of the communities we serve. We support a work environment where individual differences are valued and respected and where each individual who shares the fundamental values of the company has an opportunity to contribute and grow based on individual merit. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action U.S. Bancorp and our subsidiaries are committed to providing Equal Employment Opportunity to all employees and applicants for employment. In keeping with this commitment, employment decisions are made based upon performance, skill and abilities, not race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation or any other factors protected by law. The corporation complies with municipal, state and federal fair employment laws, including regulations applying to federal contractors. U.S. Bancorp, including each of our subsidiaries, is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to creating a diverse workforce. C O R P O R AT E I N F O R M AT I O N : Executive Offices U.S. Bancorp 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Common Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar Mellon Investor Services acts as our transfer agent and registrar, dividend paying agent and dividend reinvestment plan administrator, and maintains all shareholder records for the corporation. Inquiries related to shareholder records, stock transfers, changes of ownership, lost stock certiﬁcates, changes of address and dividend payment should be directed to the transfer agent at: Mellon Investor Services P.O. Box 3315 South Hackensack, NJ 07606-1915 Phone: 888-778-1311 or 201-680-4000 Internet: melloninvestor.com For Registered or Certiﬁed Mail: Mellon Investor Services 480 Washington Boulevard Jersey City, NJ 07310 Telephone representatives are available weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time, and automated support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Speciﬁc information about your account is available on Mellon’s internet site by clicking on For Investors and then the Investor ServiceDirect® link. Independent Auditor Ernst & Young LLP serves as the independent auditor for U.S. Bancorp’s ﬁnancial statements. Common Stock Listing and Trading U.S. Bancorp common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol USB. U.S. Bank Member FDIC This report printed on recycled paper containing a minimum of 10 percent post-consumer waste. USB_2005AR_complete.qxd 3/7/06 9:45 AM Page D U.S. Bancorp 800 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 usbank.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above