NOTICE OF THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
2020 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Page
2020 Compensation Decisions......................................
Other Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2020..............
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal
2020 ............................................................................
Employment Agreements................................................
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2020 Year-End .....
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020.........
Pension Benefits .............................................................
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2020...
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-In-
Control ........................................................................
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans....................................................
Pay Ratio Disclosure.......................................................
Proposal 2. Ratification of the Selection of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ....
Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.............................................................................
Fees Billed to Vail Resorts by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during Fiscal 2020
and Fiscal 2019 ...........................................................
Proposal 3. Advisory Vote to Approve Executive
Compensation ..............................................................
The Annual Meeting and Voting – Questions and
Answers ........................................................................
Stockholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting .........
Householding of Proxy Materials...................................
Other Matters ..................................................................
33
36
38
40
41
42
44
44
45
46
48
49
50
50
50
51
52
56
56
57
Proxy Summary ...............................................................
Proposal 1. Election of Directors....................................
Information with Respect to Nominees ..........................
Management.....................................................................
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive
Officers .........................................................................
Information as to Certain Stockholders ........................
Corporate Governance....................................................
Corporate Governance Guidelines..................................
Board Leadership and Lead Independent Director .........
Meetings of the Board.....................................................
Executive Sessions..........................................................
Director Nominations .....................................................
Determinations Regarding Independence.......................
Communications with the Board ....................................
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct ............................
Risk Management ...........................................................
Compensation Risk Assessment .....................................
Committees of the Board ................................................
The Audit Committee...................................................
Audit Committee Report ...........................................
The Compensation Committee.....................................
Compensation Committee Report .............................
The Nominating & Governance Committee ................
The Executive Committee............................................
Director Compensation ...................................................
Director Compensation for Fiscal 2020..........................
Director Cash Compensation ..........................................
Director Equity Compensation .......................................
Limited Director Perquisites and Personal Benefits .......
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee
Directors..........................................................................
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports...................................
Transactions with Related Persons ................................
Related Party Transactions Policy and Procedures.........
Executive Compensation.................................................
Compensation Discussion and Analysis .........................
Recent Developments Affecting Fiscal 2020 and
Fiscal 2021 Compensation..........................................
Executive Summary of our Compensation Program .....
Key Objectives of Our Executive Compensation
Program.......................................................................
Compensation-Setting Process .....................................
Elements of Compensation ...........................................
1
5
5
11
12
13
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
26
26
26
27
30
30
32
i
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary contains highlights about our Company and the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This summary does
not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the annual meeting, and we encourage you to read the
entire Proxy Statement and our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2020 (the “Annual
Report”) carefully before voting. Page references are provided to help you find further information in this Proxy Statement. For
information concerning the annual meeting and voting on the proposals discussed in more detail in this Proxy Statement, please
see “The Annual Meeting and Voting – Questions and Answers” beginning on page 52.
Corporate Governance Highlights (page 14)
We believe good governance is integral to achieving long-term stockholder value. We are committed to governance policies
and practices that serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board of Directors monitors developments in
governance best practices to assure that it continues to meet its commitment to thoughtful and independent representation of
stockholder interests. Highlights of our corporate governance include:
•
•
•
•
All of our director nominees are independent, except our CEO;
All of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committee members are independent;
An independent non-executive lead director;
Annual election of all directors;
• Majority voting standard and a director resignation policy in uncontested director elections;
•
Executive sessions of independent directors held at regularly scheduled Board meetings;
• Meaningful stock ownership guidelines;
•
•
•
Excellent track record of attendance of all directors at Board and committee meetings in fiscal 2020;
Anti-hedging policy for all directors and executive officers; and
Clawback policy applicable to executive officers for both cash and equity-based awards.
1
Director Nominees (page 5)
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director stands for election
annually. Detailed information about each director nominee’s background, skill set and areas of experience can be found
beginning on page 5.
Director Nominee
Susan L. Decker
Robert A. Katz
Nadia Rawlinson
John T. Redmond
Michele Romanow
Hilary A. Schneider
D. Bruce Sewell
John F. Sorte
Peter A. Vaughn
Director
Since
2015
1996
2019
2008
2016
2010
2013
1993
2013
Primary Occupation and Experience
CEO and Co-Founder of Raftr and
Principal of Deck3 Ventures LLC
Chairman and CEO of Vail Resorts, Inc.
Chief People Officer of Slack
Technologies, Inc.
President of Allegiant Travel Company
Co-Founder and President of Clearbanc
President and CEO of Shutterfly, Inc.
Former SVP, General Counsel &
Secretary of Apple Inc.
Executive Chairman of Morgan Joseph
TriArtisan Group, Inc.
Founder and Managing Director of
Vaughn Advisory Group, LLC
Fiscal 2020 Meetings:
Audit – Audit Committee
Comp – Compensation Committee
N&G – Nominating & Governance Committee
Committee Memberships
Independent Audit
Comp N&G Exec
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Chair
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
F
F
Chair
F
X
4
Chair X
X
X
2
—
Exec – Executive Committee
F – Audit Committee Financial Expert
– Lead Independent Director
The Board of Directors held seven meetings during fiscal 2020. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the
meetings held by the Board and Board committees on which he or she served during the fiscal year.
Executive Compensation Highlights (see page 26)
Under our executive compensation program, a significant portion (approximately 75% and 76%, respectively) of the
CEO’s and other named executive officers’ annual target total direct compensation is variable based upon our operating
performance and/or our stock price, as shown below:
2
In addition, for fiscal 2020, we engaged in (or refrained from) certain pay practices with respect to our named executive
officer compensation program that we believe align with market best practices:
What We Do:
Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
Independent Compensation Committee
Significant Portion of Executive Compensation Tied to Performance
Significant Portion of Executive Compensation Delivered in the Form of Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives
Market Alignment of Compensation but with Greater Emphasis on At- Risk Compensation
Independent Compensation Consultant
Clawback Policy
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Use of Tally Sheets
Annual Risk Assessment
What We Don’t Do:
No Excessive Perquisites
No Tax Gross-Ups on Perquisites, Except for Standard Relocation Benefits
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups
No Automatic Salary Increases or Guaranteed Bonuses
No “Single Trigger” Automatic Payments, Benefits or Equity Vesting Upon a Change in Control
No Hedging or Pledging
No Equity Repricing
No Pension Plans or SERPs
VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The following table summarizes the proposals to be considered at the annual meeting and the Board’s voting recommendation
with respect to each proposal.
Management Proposals
Election of the nine directors named in this Proxy Statement, each for a one-year term
expiring in 2021
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal 2021
Advisory vote to approve executive compensation
Board Vote
Recommendation
FOR EACH
NOMINEE
FOR
FOR
Page
Reference
5
50
51
Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)
We are asking stockholders to elect each of our nominees for the Board of Directors named in this proxy statement. Our nominees
are: Susan L. Decker, Robert A. Katz, Nadia Rawlinson, John T. Redmond, Michele Romanow, Hilary A. Schneider, D. Bruce
Sewell, John F. Sorte and Peter A. Vaughn. If elected, each director nominee will serve as a director for a one-year term that expires
in 2021.
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Auditor (Proposal No. 2)
We are asking stockholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting
firm for fiscal 2021. The Audit Committee has selected, and the Board of Directors has ratified the selection of,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2021. Set forth below is
information about its fees in fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019.
3
Type of fees
Audit fees
Audit-related fees
Tax fees
Other fees
Total
2020
2019
$
2,896,000 $
2,910,500
178,400
5,100
3,079,500 $
$
—
12,000
4,500
2,927,000
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Proposal No. 3)
We are asking stockholders to cast an advisory, non-binding vote to approve compensation awarded to our named executive officers.
The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to emphasize pay-for-performance by incentivizing our executive
officers and senior management to drive superior results and generate stockholder value. Additional information regarding our
executive compensation may be found elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
MEETING INFORMATION
Date and time:
December 3, 2020, 9:00 a.m. Mountain Time
Website:
Record date:
Voting:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020
October 7, 2020
Stockholders at the close of business on the record date may vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted upon.
4
390 Interlocken Crescent
Broomfield, Colorado 80021
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2020
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
We are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) to be voted at our annual meeting, which will take place on Thursday, December 3, 2020
at 9:00 a.m., Mountain Time, via live virtual shareholder meeting, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. As a
stockholder, you are invited to attend the annual meeting and are requested to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy
Statement.
In accordance with the “notice and access” rules and regulations of the SEC, instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy
materials to each stockholder of record or beneficial owner, we are furnishing proxy materials, which include our Proxy Statement
and annual report, to our stockholders over the Internet. Because you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, unless you have previously made a permanent election to
receive these materials in hard copy or unless you request a printed copy as described below. Instead, the Notice of Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the important information contained
in the proxy materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you as to how you may submit your
proxy. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our
proxy materials you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice of Internet Availability of
Proxy Materials.
It is anticipated that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be mailed, and this Proxy Statement will be
made available, to stockholders on or about October 21, 2020.
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the annual meeting, nine directors will be nominated for election to the Board to serve for the next year and until their
respective successors are elected and qualified. The nominees are Mmes. Decker, Rawlinson, Romanow and Schneider and
Messrs. Katz, Redmond, Sewell, Sorte and Vaughn. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company and all nominees
were previously elected by stockholders, except for Ms. Rawlinson, who joined the Board on December 5, 2019. Ms. Rawlinson
was identified to be a director of the Company by a search firm hired by the Nominating and Governance Committee, and after
a thorough review and interview process conducted by such committee, was appointed to be a director of the Company.
The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, who have been designated by the Board, intend to vote, unless
otherwise instructed in such proxy, “FOR” the election of Mmes. Decker, Rawlinson, Romanow and Schneider and Messrs. Katz,
Redmond, Sewell, Sorte and Vaughn as directors. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected
occurrence, your shares will be voted for the election of a substitute nominee, if any, proposed by the Board. Each person nominated
for election has agreed to serve if elected. Our Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve. The proxies
solicited by this proxy statement may not be voted for more than nine nominees.
INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO NOMINEES
The Nominating & Governance Committee monitors the mix of skills, knowledge, perspective, leadership, age, experience
and diversity among directors in order to assure that the Board has the ability to perform its oversight function effectively. The
Nominating & Governance Committee has determined that the Board will be comprised of individuals who meet the highest
possible personal and professional standards. Our director nominees should have broad experience in management, policymaking
and/or finance, relevant industry knowledge, business creativity and vision. They should also be committed to enhancing
stockholder value and should be able to dedicate sufficient time to effectively carry out their duties.
The Nominating & Governance Committee considers many factors when determining the eligibility of candidates for
nomination as director. The Nominating & Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy; however, in connection
with the annual nomination process, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers the diversity of candidates to ensure
that the Board is comprised of individuals with a broad range of experiences and backgrounds who can contribute to the Board’s
5
overall effectiveness in carrying out its responsibilities. The Nominating & Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of
its efforts at achieving a diverse Board when it annually evaluates the Board’s composition.
The Nominating & Governance Committee considers the following specific characteristics in making its nominations for
our Board: independence, wisdom, integrity, understanding and general acceptance of the Company’s corporate philosophy,
business or professional knowledge and experience that can bear on the Company’s and the Board’s challenges and deliberations,
proven record of accomplishment with excellent organizations, inquiring mind, willingness to speak one’s mind, ability to challenge
and stimulate management, future orientation, willingness to commit time and energy, diversity and international/global experience.
At the Annual Meeting, director nominees will stand for election for one-year terms, expiring at the 2021 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders. The following sets forth the name and age of each director, identifies whether the director is currently a member
of the Board, lists all other positions and offices, if any, now held by him or her with the Company, and specifies his or her principal
occupation during at least the last five years.
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
SUSAN L. DECKER
Age – 57
CEO & Co-Founder of Raftr
Director Since
September 2015
Independent
Committees:
Compensation (Chair),
Nominating & Governance
Current Public Directorships:
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
Costco Wholesale Corporation
SurveyMonkey
Ms. Decker is CEO and co-founder of Raftr, a college campus social platform which was
launched in 2017. In addition, Ms. Decker is the principal of Deck3 Ventures LLC, a privately
held consulting and advisory firm, a position she has held since 2009. Ms. Decker currently
serves on the boards of directors of Berkshire Hathaway Corporation, Costco Wholesale
Corporation, SurveyMonkey and Vox Media. During the 2009-2010 academic year, Ms.
Decker served as Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Harvard Business School. Prior to that, from
June 2000 to April 2009, she held various executive management positions at Yahoo! Inc.,
a global Internet brand, including President (June 2007 to April 2009), head of the Advertiser
and Publisher Group (December 2006 to June 2007) and Chief Financial Officer (June 2000
to June 2007). Prior to joining Yahoo!, she spent 14 years with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
(DLJ), most recently as Managing Director, global equity research (1998 - 2000), and
previously as an equity research analyst, covering publishing and advertising stocks from
1986 to 1998.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership and Finance experience—former lead director of an international
manufacturer of microprocessors and chipsets (Intel); current principal of
corporate advisory firm (Deck3); former president and CFO of large public global
technology company (Yahoo!); former entrepreneur-in-residence for leading
business school (Harvard); former global director of equity research for an
investment bank (DLJ)
• Technology and International experience—director of a large, diverse
multinational conglomerate (Berkshire); director of a leading global retailer
(Costco); former director of an international manufacturer of microprocessors and
chipsets company (Intel); leadership positions at large public global technology
company (Yahoo!); former director of global equity research for an investment
bank (DLJ); director of a cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) company
(SurveyMonkey); CEO & co-founder of a digital media product (Raftr)
6
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
ROBERT A. KATZ
Age – 53
Chairman of the Board & CEO
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Mr. Katz served as Lead Director of the Company from June 2003 until his appointment as
Chief Executive Officer in February 2006. Prior to becoming the Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Katz was associated with Apollo Management L.P., a private equity investment firm,
since its founding in 1990. Mr. Katz serves on the Wharton Leadership Advisory Board at
the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Katz has previously served on numerous private, public
and non-profit boards.
Director Since
June 1996
Chairman of the Board Since
March 2009
Committees:
Executive
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership, Industry and Marketing experience—professional association with
Vail Resorts began in 1992 and has been involved with all major strategic
decisions for over two decades; CEO since 2006 with unique insight and
information regarding the Company’s strategy, operations and business and
experience with global branding, development and strategy, as well a unique
historical perspective into the operations and vision for the Company (Vail
Resorts)
• Finance experience—current CEO of large public company (Vail Resorts); former
senior partner at large private equity investment firm (Apollo)
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
NADIA RAWLINSON
Age – 41
Chief People Officer,
Slack Technologies, Inc.
Director Since
December 2019
Independent
Committees:
Compensation
In September 2020, Ms. Rawlinson was appointed Chief People Officer of Slack
Technologies, Inc., a leading channel-based messaging platform. From June 2016 to
September 2020, Ms. Rawlinson was the Chief Human Resources Officer at Live Nation
Entertainment (LYN), overseeing HR strategy and development on a global basis for the
company’s 35,000 full time and seasonal employees. Prior to that, Ms. Rawlinson worked
as the Chief Human Resources Officer at Rakuten Americas, part of Japan-based Rakuten
Group, one of the largest Internet services companies in the world. Before joining Rakuten
Americas, she operated in both HR and business leadership roles holding senior positions
at Groupon, American Express, Rent the Runway and Google. Ms. Rawlinson also serves
as the chair for two private/non-profit organizations: the CHRO Board Academy, and
Stanford University's Alumni Committee on Trustee Nomination (ACTN). Ms. Rawlinson
received her Bachelor of Arts from Stanford University and MBA from Harvard Business
School.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership experience— current chief people officer of a large technology
company (Slack); former chief human resources officer of a Fortune 500 live
music entertainment company (Live Nation); former chief human resources officer
of a large international internet services company (Rakuten Americas); leadership
positions at various technology and financial services companies (Groupon, Rent
the Runway, American Express)
• Industry and Technology experience—former chief human resources officer of a
large international internet services company (Rakuten Americas); former vice
president of global e-commerce marketplace (Groupon); former director of online
& mobile enterprise growth at a global, public financial services company
(American Express)
7
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
JOHN T. REDMOND
Age – 62
President, Allegiant Travel
Company
Director Since
March 2008
Independent
Committees:
Audit
Mr. Redmond is the President of Allegiant Travel Company effective September 2016 and
also serves as a director of Allegiant. Previously, Mr. Redmond was the Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer of Echo Entertainment Group Limited, a leading Australian
entertainment and gaming company, from January 2013 to April 2014, and previously served
as a non-executive director from March 2012 to January 2013. Mr. Redmond was President
and Chief Executive Officer of MGM Grand Resorts, LLC, a collection of resort-casino,
residential living and retail developments, and a director of its parent company, MGM Resorts
International, from March 2001 to August 2007. He served as Co-Chief Executive Officer
and a director of MGM Grand, Inc. from December 1999 to March 2001. Mr. Redmond was
President and Chief Operating Officer of Primm Valley Resorts from March 1999 to
December 1999 and Senior Vice President of MGM Grand Development, Inc. from August
1996 to February 1999. Prior to 1996, Mr. Redmond was Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Caesars Palace and Sheraton Desert Inn, having served in various other
senior operational and development positions with Caesars World, Inc. Mr. Redmond
previously served on the board of directors of Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and Casino, Inc.
Current Public Directorships:
Allegiant Travel Company
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership and Finance experience—former CEO of large public entertainment
and gaming company (Echo); former senior officer and director of large public
entertainment and gaming company (MGM); president and director of low-cost,
high-efficiency, all-jet passenger airline (Allegiant)
• Industry and International experience—president and director of leisure travel
company (Allegiant); former CEO of large public entertainment and gaming
company (Echo); former senior officer and director of large public entertainment
and gaming company (MGM)
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
MICHELE ROMANOW
Age – 35
Co-Founder & President,
Clearbanc
Director Since
October 2016
Independent
Committees:
Compensation
Current Public Directorships:
Freshii, Inc.
Ms. Romanow is the Co-Founder and President of Clearbanc, a tech company changing the
way companies raise money by providing fast, affordable growth capital to online brands.
Clearbanc has raised $420 million to date and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Previously, Ms. Romanow was the Co-Founder of Snap by Groupon (previously SnapSaves),
which was founded in March 2012 and acquired by Groupon, Inc. in June 2014. She served
as a senior marketing executive for Groupon from June 2014 until March 2016. In February
2011, Ms. Romanow founded Buytopia.ca, a Canadian ecommerce leader. Prior to that she
was Director, Corporate Strategy & Business Improvement for Sears Canada. Ms. Romanow
is also one of the venture capitalists on the award winning CBC series Dragons’ Den. Ms.
Romanow is a director of Freshii Inc., a Canadian fast casual restaurant franchise whose
stock is publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and League of Innovators, a
Canadian charity with a goal of building entrepreneurial acumen for youth. Ms. Romanow
was previously a director of Whistler Blackcomb, which was acquired by Vail Resorts in
October 2016 and previously a director of SHAD, a registered Canadian charity that
empowers exceptional high school students. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering
and a Master of Business Administration from Queen’s University.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership experience— co-founder and president of Clearbanc; co-founder of
SnapSaves (now Snap by Groupon) and former head of marketing of Snap by
Groupon; co-founder and partner of Buytopia.ca; director of Freshii and former
director of Whistler Blackcomb
• Technology and Marketing experience—former senior marketing executive
(Groupon); co-founder of three technology companies (Clearbanc, SnapSaves and
Buytopia.ca)
8
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
HILARY A. SCHNEIDER
Age – 59
President and CEO,
Shutterfly, Inc.
Director Since
March 2010
Independent
Committees:
Compensation
In January 2020, Ms. Schneider was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of
Shutterfly, Inc., a leading digital retailer and manufacturer of personalized products and
services. From January 2018 to November 2019 she served as CEO of Wag!, the country's
largest on-demand mobile dog walking and dog care service. Prior to that, Ms. Schneider
served as the CEO of LifeLock, Inc., a leading provider of identity theft protection, identity
risk assessment and fraud protection services, a position she held since March 2016 until
the acquisition of LifeLock by Symantec in February 2017. From September 2012 to
February 2016, she served as the President of LifeLock, Inc. From March 2010 to November
2010, Ms. Schneider served as Executive Vice President at Yahoo! Americas. She joined
Yahoo! in September 2006 when she led the company's U.S. region, Global Partner Solutions
and Local Markets and Commerce divisions. Prior to joining Yahoo!, she held senior
leadership roles at Knight Ridder, Inc., from April 2002 to January 2005, including Chief
Executive Officer of Knight Ridder Digital before moving to co-manage the company's
overall newspaper and online business. From 2000 to 2002, Ms. Schneider served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Red Herring Communications. She also held
numerous roles at Times Mirror from 1990 through 2000, including President and Chief
Executive Officer of Times Mirror Interactive and General Manager of the Baltimore Sun.
Ms. Schneider serves as a senior advisor for TPG Capital and also currently serves on the
board of directors of Getty Images, Inc. a visual media company, and Water.org, a non-profit
organization. Ms. Schneider was also previously a member of the board of directors of
LifeLock, Inc. and SendGrid, Inc.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership experience—president and CEO of leading digital retailer and
personalized products manufacturer (Shutterfly, Inc.), former CEO of an on-
demand dog walking & dog care company (Wag!), former director, president and
CEO of large public identity and fraud protection company (LifeLock); leadership
positions at large public global technology company (Yahoo!)
• Industry and Marketing experience—former president and CEO of large public
identity and fraud protection company (LifeLock); leadership positions at large
public global technology company (Yahoo!); former director of a SaaS-based
multi-channel engagement platform (SendGrid); senior advisor to large private
equity investment firm (TPG)
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
D. BRUCE SEWELL
Age – 62
Former Senior Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary
Apple Inc.
Director Since
January 2013
Lead Independent Director
Since June 2019
From September 2009 until December 2017, Mr. Sewell was Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of Apple Inc., overseeing all legal matters for Apple, including
corporate governance, intellectual property, litigation and securities compliance, as well as
global security operations, privacy and encryption. Prior to joining Apple, Mr. Sewell served
as Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Intel Corporation from 2005 to 2009. He also
served as Intel’s Vice President, General Counsel from 2004 to 2005 and Vice President of
Legal and Government Affairs, Deputy General Counsel from 2001 to 2004. Prior to joining
Intel in 1995 as a senior attorney, Mr. Sewell was a partner in the law firm of Brown and
Bain PC. In April 2018, Mr. Sewell joined the board of Village Enterprise, a charitable
organization focusing on training and creating sustainable businesses in Africa. Mr. Sewell
serves on the board of directors of C3.ai, a privately held technology company, and Clearbanc,
a growth capital technology company. He also serves as President and Director of Friends
of Lancaster University in America, a non-profit organization supporting higher education.
Independent
Skills and Qualifications:
Committees:
Audit, Executive,
Nominating & Governance
(Chair)
• Leadership and Finance experience—prior general counsel of a large
international public company (Apple); leadership positions at international
manufacturer of microprocessors and chipsets (Intel)
• Technology and International experience—prior general counsel of international
public mobile communication, personal computer, software and media devices
company (Apple); leadership positions at international manufacturer of
microprocessors and chipsets (Intel); leadership position at cloud-based enterprise
Platform as a Service (PaaS) for deployment of big data, AI & IoT software
applications (C3.ai)
9
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
JOHN F. SORTE
Age – 73
Executive Chairman,
Morgan Joseph
TriArtisan Group Inc.
Director Since
January 1993
Independent
Committees:
Audit (Chair), Compensation,
Nominating & Governance,
Executive
Mr. Sorte is Executive Chairman of Morgan Joseph TriArtisan Group Inc., a merchant bank
engaged in principal investment activities. Prior to co-founding Morgan Joseph in 2001, he
was President of New Street Advisors L.P. He previously held various positions at Drexel
Burnham Lambert, including Head of the Energy Group, Co-head of Investment Banking
and Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors. Mr. Sorte started his
career as an investment banker at Shearson Hammill. Mr. Sorte also serves on the board of
directors of Shorts International Ltd. and previously served on the board of directors of
Autotote Corp. and Westpoint Stevens Inc., as well as several private companies and non-
profit organizations.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership and Finance experience—executive chairman of merchant bank
(Morgan Joseph); former president of private equity firm (New Street); prior
leadership positions at global investment bank (Drexel)
• International experience—executive chairman of merchant bank with
international operations (Morgan Joseph); prior leadership positions at global
investment bank (Drexel)
Director Nominee
Business Experience, Other Directorships and Qualifications
PETER A. VAUGHN
Age – 56
Founder and Managing
Director of Vaughn Advisory
Group, LLC
Director Since
June 2013
Independent
Committees:
Audit
Mr. Vaughn is the Founding and Managing Director of the Vaughn Advisory Group, LLC,
a privately-held company providing consulting services on global brand strategy, customer
experience and marketing. From July 2018 to January 2020, Mr. Vaughn served as Chief
Experience Officer of Avenues: The World School, a privately-held, for-profit global network
of independent schools headquartered in New York. From January 2013 through November
2014, he was the Senior Vice President of International Consumer Products and Marketing
of the American Express Company, providing strategic marketing leadership for the
company’s consumer card-issuing and network businesses in over 160 countries worldwide,
with a focus on product line strategy, benefit sourcing and management, product innovation,
brand management, communications and advertising. Previously, he held several senior
marketing roles within American Express, including serving as Chief Marketing Officer of
Global Network Services from 2011 to January 2013, Senior Vice President of Global Brand
Management from 2005 to 2011, Vice President of Marketing for the Travelers Cheque and
Prepaid Services Group from 2002 to 2004, Vice President and General Manager of Lending
for the Small Business Division in 2001 and Vice President of Acquisition and Advertising
for Small Business Services from 1999 to 2001. From 1994 to 1999, he held several positions
overseas in the Consumer Services Group of American Express, including Vice President
of International Product Development, European Head of Revolving Credit and Lending
and Senior Director of European Product Development. Mr. Vaughn joined American
Express in 1992, acting as Director of Marketing for the Consumer Financial Services Group.
Skills and Qualifications:
• Leadership and International experience—former senior global marketing
positions and senior business leader in multiple business lines at a global, public
financial services company (American Express); executive of global school
network (Avenues)
• Marketing and Finance experience—principal of privately-held global brand
strategy and marketing company (Vaughn Advisory Group); former senior global
marketing positions and senior business leader in multiple business lines with
operational marketing and profit/loss responsibility at a global, public financial
services company (American Express); former senior executive of a global private
school network (Avenues)
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE
NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
10
The Company’s executive officers, as well as additional information with respect to such persons, are set forth below:
MANAGEMENT
Name
Robert A. Katz
Patricia A. Campbell
Michael Z. Barkin
Kirsten A. Lynch
David T. Shapiro
James C. O’Donnell
Position
Age
53 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
57
42
52
50
50
President - Mountain Division
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Executive Vice President, Hospitality, Retail & Real Estate
For biographical information about Mr. Katz, see “Director Nominees” above.
Patricia A. Campbell has served as President - Mountain Division since August 2015. Ms. Campbell previously served as
Executive Vice President since October 2013 and served as the Chief Operating Officer of Breckenridge Ski Resort since October
2009. Prior to that, Ms. Campbell was Chief Operating Officer of Keystone Resort from November 2006 to September 2009.
Ms. Campbell joined the Company in July 1999 as the Director of Ski School at Breckenridge, and she has more than 25 years of
expertise in the ski industry and senior management, holding various roles from her start as a Ski School Instructor at Jackson
Hole Mountain Resort in 1985. Ms. Campbell serves as a member of the board of the National Ski Areas Association.
Michael Z. Barkin has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2013. Mr. Barkin previously
served as Vice President of Strategy and Development since July 2012. Prior to joining the Company, he was a principal at KRG
Capital Partners, a private equity investment firm, where he was a member of the investment team since 2006. At KRG, Mr. Barkin
was responsible for managing new acquisitions and had portfolio company oversight across multiple sectors. Prior to KRG, he
worked at Bain Capital Partners, a private equity investment firm, and Bain & Company, a strategy and consulting firm. Mr.
Barkin currently serves on the board of directors of CLEAR, the secure biometrics identity company, the National Forest Foundation
(NFF) and the Museum of Contemporary Art in Denver.
Kirsten A. Lynch has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since July 2011. Prior to joining the
Company, Ms. Lynch was with PepsiCo, Inc., where she was Chief Marketing Officer of the Quaker Foods and Snacks Division
from 2009 to 2011, leading the brand marketing, consumer insights and shopper marketing organization. From 2007 to 2009, she
was Vice President of Marketing for Kraft Foods Group, Inc.’s Cheese and Dairy Business Unit. Ms. Lynch had worked for Kraft
Foods since 1996, holding various marketing positions for the company’s product divisions, including Senior Marketing Director
of Kraft Mac & Cheese and Family Dinners, as well as Senior Brand Manager and Brand Manager for product lines such as salad
dressings, barbecue, DiGiorno Pasta & Sauce and Miracle Whip. Ms. Lynch started her career with Ford Motor Company in
marketing and sales. Ms. Lynch is also a member of the board of directors of Stitch Fix, Inc., a publicly traded ecommerce company
focused on personalized data-driven fashion.
David T. Shapiro joined Vail Resorts as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in July 2015. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Shapiro served as General Counsel for DaVita Kidney Care, a division of DaVita Inc., and previously served
as the company's Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Special Counsel. Before joining DaVita in 2008, Mr. Shapiro practiced law
with firms in Connecticut, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., and he also served as a trial attorney with the United States
Department of Justice. Mr. Shapiro currently serves as a member of the board of directors of the Denver Metro Chamber of
Commerce, and board of trustees for Colorado Academy. He has previously served on other private and nonprofit boards, including
the Children's Hospital Colorado and the Denver Public School Foundation.
James C. O’Donnell was appointed Executive Vice President - Hospitality, Retail & Real Estate in December 2016, having
previously served as Senior Vice President of Lodging and Real Estate, Chief Operating Officer of Vail Resorts Hospitality and
as the Hospitality division's Chief Financial Officer. Mr. O’Donnell has held numerous positions in the Company since he joined
in 2002, including Corporate Director of Finance, Regional Director of Operations and Vice President of Strategic Development.
Prior to 2002, Mr. O’Donnell specialized in the hospitality and real estate industries as an Assurance and Business Advisory
Services Manager at Arthur Andersen.
11
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth in the following table is the beneficial ownership of common stock at the close of business on October 7, 2020 for
all directors, nominees, named executive officers and all directors and named executive officers as a group as of such date.
Name of Beneficial Owner
Susan L. Decker
Nadia Rawlinson
John T. Redmond
Michele Romanow
Hilary A. Schneider
D. Bruce Sewell
John F. Sorte
Peter A. Vaughn
Robert A. Katz
Michael Z. Barkin
Patricia A. Campbell
Kirsten A. Lynch
David T. Shapiro
Directors and named executive officers as a
group (13 persons)
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Shares
4,931
—
18,950
3,708
19,772
17,251
44,990
8,025
593,935(2)
29,347(3)
39,728(4)
41,047(5)
7,374(6)
829,058(7)
Percent of Class(1)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.5%
*
*
*
*
2.1%
* Less than 1.0%.
(1) Applicable percentages are based on 40,249,124 shares outstanding on October 7, 2020, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. Unless
indicated by footnote, the address for each listed director and executive officer is c/o Vail Resorts, Inc., 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado
80021. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to
securities. Except as indicated by footnote, the person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common
stock beneficially owned by them.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each listed person includes the restricted share units, or
RSUs, and common stock underlying share appreciation rights, or SARs, held by that person that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within
60 days of October 7, 2020, but excludes RSUs and our common stock underlying SARs held by any other person.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Includes 331,411 shares of common stock underlying 571,201 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock
on October 7, 2020).
Includes 11,791 shares of common stock underlying 41,288 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock
on October 7, 2020).
Includes 22,909 shares of common stock underlying 56,184 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock
on October 7, 2020).
Includes 21,454 shares of common stock underlying 54,517 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock
on October 7, 2020).
Includes 4,655 shares of common stock underlying 18,923 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock on
October 7, 2020).
Includes 392,220 shares of common stock underlying 742,113 SARs (assuming a fair market value of $233.42, the closing price of our common stock
on October 7, 2020).
12
INFORMATION AS TO CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS
Set forth below is certain information with respect to the only persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners
of more than five percent of the Company’s voting securities at the close of business on October 7, 2020.
Name of Beneficial Owner
Ronald Baron/Baron Capital Management, Inc. (2)
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (3)
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (4)
BlackRock Inc. (5)
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Shares
Percent of Class (1)
4,552,194
3,870,140
3,812,344
2,580,740
11.3%
9.6%
9.5%
6.4%
(1) Applicable percentages are based on 40,249,124 shares outstanding on October 7, 2020.
(2) As reported by Baron Capital Group, Inc. (“BCG”), BAMCO Inc. (“BAMCO”), Baron Capital Management Inc. (“BCM”), Baron Growth Fund
(“BGF”) and Ronald Baron and on a joint Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020. BAMCO and BCM are subsidiaries of BCG.
BGF is an advisory client of BAMCO. Ronald Baron owns a controlling interest in BCG. The address for the holders is 767 Fifth Avenue, 49th Floor,
New York, NY 10153.
(3) As reported by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund, Inc., on a joint Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on May 11,
2020. The address for the holder is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.
(4) As reported by The Vanguard Group Inc. (“TVG”) on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of TVG, is the beneficial owner of 17,728 shares of the Company’s common stock as a result of its serving as investment
manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TVG, is the beneficial owner of 34,826
shares of the Company’s common stock as a result of its serving as an investment manager of Australian investment offerings. The address for the
holder is 100 Vanguard Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355.
(5) As reported by BlackRock Inc. on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020. The address for the holder is 55 East 52nd Street, New
York, NY 10055.
13
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
The Board acts as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with
the Company’s stockholders. The Board selects, advises and oversees our management, who are responsible for the day-to-day
operations and administration of the Company. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which, along with the
charters of each of the committees of the Board and the Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which we refer to as
the Code of Ethics, provide the framework for the governance of the Company. A complete copy of the Company’s Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Board committees and the Code of Ethics for directors, officers and employees may
be found in the “Governance” section of the Company’s website at investors.vailresorts.com. Copies of these materials are also
available in print, without charge upon written request to: Secretary, Vail Resorts, Inc., 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield,
Colorado 80021.
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
Currently, the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company are held by the same person,
Mr. Katz. When the Chairman of the Board is a non-independent director, the independent directors elect an independent director
to serve in a lead capacity. Mr. Katz serves as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Sewell serves as our Lead Independent Director, or
Lead Director. The Board has adopted a Charter of the Lead Independent Director (attached as Appendix A to the Corporate
Governance Guidelines), which is available in the “Governance” section of the Company’s website under “Governance Documents”
at investors.vailresorts.com. The Lead Director coordinates the activities of the other non-management directors and performs
such other duties and responsibilities as the Board may determine.
The specific duties of the Lead Director include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
presiding over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of
independent directors;
having the authority to call meetings of the independent directors;
serving as the presiding director for purposes of all rights and duties assigned to the presiding director under the
Company’s Bylaws, including the right to call special meetings of the Board;
serving as principal liaison on Board-wide issues between the independent directors and the Chairman;
reviewing information sent to the Board and communicating with management if there needs to be additional
materials or analyses provided to directors;
approving meeting agendas and meeting schedules for the Board, to assure that there is sufficient time for
discussion of all agenda items;
serving as the point of contact for communications from stockholders or other interested parties directed to the
Lead Director or the non-management directors or Board as a group;
ensuring that he is available for consultation and direct communication, if requested by major stockholders; and
serving on the Executive Committee of the Board.
The Board believes that a single leader serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with an experienced and
engaged Lead Director, is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Board at this time. The Board believes that this approach
is best because the Chief Executive Officer is the individual with primary responsibility for implementing the Company’s strategy
as approved by the Board and directing the work of other executive officers. This structure results in a single leader being directly
accountable to the Board and, through the Board, to stockholders, and enables the Chief Executive Officer to act as the key link
between the Board and other members of management.
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD
The Board held a total of seven meetings during fiscal 2020. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all
meetings of the Board and the standing committees of the Board on which he or she served. In accordance with our Corporate
Governance Guidelines, directors are invited and encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. All of our then-serving
directors attended our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
The non-management directors’ practice is to meet in executive session following the conclusion of each regularly scheduled
quarterly Board meeting to discuss such matters as they deem appropriate and, at least once a year, to review the Compensation
14
Committee’s annual review of the Chief Executive Officer. These executive sessions are chaired by the Lead Director. Interested
parties, including our stockholders, may communicate with the Lead Director and the non-management directors by following
the procedures under the heading “Communications with the Board” below.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
The Nominating & Governance Committee considers and recommends candidates for election to the Board. The
Nominating & Governance Committee also considers candidates for election to the Board, if any, that are submitted by stockholders.
Each member of the Nominating & Governance Committee participates in the review and discussion of director candidates. In
addition, members of the Board who are not on the Nominating & Governance Committee may meet with and evaluate the
suitability of candidates. In making its selections of candidates to recommend for election, the Nominating & Governance
Committee seeks persons who have achieved prominence in their field and who possess significant experience in areas of importance
to the Company. The minimum qualifications that the Nominating & Governance Committee believes must be met for a candidate
to be nominated include independence, wisdom, integrity, understanding and general acceptance of the Company’s corporate
philosophy, business or professional knowledge and experience that can bear on the Company’s and the Board’s challenges and
deliberations, proven record of accomplishment with excellent organizations, inquiring mind, willingness to speak one’s mind,
ability to challenge and stimulate management, future orientation, willingness to commit time and energy, diversity and
international/global experience. In general, directors are expected to retire from the Board at the conclusion of the term in which
they reach age 72, unless otherwise recommended for nomination by the Nominating & Governance Committee, which the
Nominating & Governance Committee determined to do with respect to Mr. Sorte, who has attained the age of 73, particularly in
light of his knowledge of and experience with the Company as well as his financial acumen.
Stockholders who wish to submit candidates for consideration by the Nominating & Governance Committee for election at
an annual or special meeting of stockholders should submit the candidate’s name and qualifications, including the candidate’s
consent to serve as a director of the Company if nominated by the Committee and so elected, by mail to: Secretary, Vail Resorts,
Inc., 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado 80021. The Nominating & Governance Committee applies the same standards
in considering candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating candidates submitted by members of the Board. The
Nominating & Governance Committee recommended the nominees for election at this year’s annual meeting, all of whom are
currently serving as directors.
DETERMINATIONS REGARDING INDEPENDENCE
Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a majority of the Board must be comprised of directors who are
independent, as determined based on the independence standards of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual. In accordance with our
Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE’s listing standards, the Board has adopted categorical standards of director
independence to assist it in making determinations of independence of Board members. These categorical standards of director
independence are available in the “Governance” section of the Company’s website under “Governance Documents” at
investors.vailresorts.com. The Board has affirmatively determined that each of the nominees, other than Mr. Katz, is “independent”
under the NYSE’s listing standards and the categorical standards of director independence adopted by the Board.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
The Board has adopted a formal process by which interested parties, including our stockholders, may communicate with
the Board, the Lead Director or the non-management directors as a group. This information is available in the “Governance”
section of the Company’s website under “Governance Documents” at investors.vailresorts.com. Information on our website does
not constitute part of this document.
CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including its chief executive
officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions. We make the Code
of Ethics available to all directors, officers and employees and convey our expectation that every director, officer and employee
read and understand the Code of Ethics and its application to the performance of each such person’s business responsibilities. To
assist in identifying such proposed transactions as they may arise, our Code of Ethics uses a principles-based guideline to alert
directors, officers and employees to potential conflicts of interest. Under the Code of Ethics, a conflict of interest occurs when an
individual’s personal, social, financial or political interests conflict with his or her loyalty to the Company. Our policy under the
Code of Ethics provides that even the appearance of a conflict of interest where none actually exists can be damaging and should
be avoided. If any person believes a conflict of interest is present in a personal activity, financial transaction or business dealing
involving the Company, then that person is instructed under the Code of Ethics to report such belief to an appropriate individual
or department as identified in the Code of Ethics.
15
The Code of Ethics is available in the “Governance” section of the Company’s website under “Governance Documents” at
investors.vailresorts.com, or in print, without charge, to any stockholder who sends a request to: Secretary, Vail Resorts, Inc., 390
Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado 80021. In the event the Company amends or waives any of the provisions of the Code
of Ethics applicable to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or chief accounting officer and controller that relates to
any element of the definition of “code of ethics” enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), the Company intends to disclose these actions on its website. Information on our
website does not constitute part of this document.
RISK MANAGEMENT
The Board believes that oversight of the Company’s overall risk management program is the responsibility of the entire
Board and views risk management as an important part of the Company’s overall strategic planning process. The Board has
delegated the regular oversight of the elements of the risk management program to the Audit Committee, and the Board receives
periodic updates on individual areas of risk from the Audit Committee or members of senior management, as appropriate. The
Board also periodically schedules a risk management agenda item for regular Board meetings, during which the Audit Committee
or members of senior management reports to and informs the Board of its risk management oversight activities. Senior management
reports directly to the Audit Committee at each scheduled Audit Committee meeting and additionally as needed on the status of
the Company’s risk management program. Specifically, cybersecurity has been identified as a critical part of risk management at
the Company. The Company has a dedicated team who is responsible for leading enterprise-wide information security strategy,
policy, standards, architecture, and processes. Cybersecurity oversight consists of the Audit Committee receiving quarterly updates
from the Chief Information Officer regarding major cyber risks areas and recommended actions to address those risks.
The Audit Committee has established an internal audit function to provide management and the Board with ongoing
assessments of the Company’s risk management processes and systems of internal control. In addition, as part of its responsibilities,
the Audit Committee inquires of management and our independent auditors about the Company’s processes for identifying and
assessing such risks and exposures and the steps management has taken to minimize such risks and exposures to the Company.
The Audit Committee also reviews the Company’s guidelines and policies that govern the processes for identifying and assessing
significant risks or exposures and for formulating and implementing steps to minimize such risks and exposures to the Company.
SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS
The Company’s resorts operate in some of the world’s greatest natural environments, and accordingly environmental
stewardship is a core philosophy for the Company. In 2017, the Company launched its Commitment to Zero, a pledge to have a
zero net operating footprint by 2030. This commitment includes achieving (i) zero net emissions by finding operational energy
efficiencies, investing in renewable energy and investing in offsets and other emissions reduction projects, (ii) zero waste to
landfills by diverting 100 percent of waste from the Company’s operations and (iii) zero net operating impact to forests and habitat
by restoring an acre of forest for every acre displaced by the Company’s operations. Performance against these objectives and
targets is routinely monitored, and details on the Company’s performance against these goals can be found in our EpicPromise
Progress Report at epicpromise.com/environment/commitment-to-zero/. Information on this website does not constitute part of
this document.
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT
The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of our independent compensation consultant, reviewed the material
compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers. The Compensation Committee considered
whether the compensation program encouraged excessive risk taking by employees at the expense of long-term Company value.
Based upon its assessment, the Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s compensation program, which includes a
mix of annual and long-term incentives, cash and equity awards and retention incentives, does not present risks that are reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee and Nominating & Governance
Committee. The charters for each of these committees, which have been approved by the Board, are available in the “Governance”
section of the Company’s website under “Committee Charters” at investors.vailresorts.com, or in print, without charge, to any
stockholder who sends a request to: Secretary, Vail Resorts, Inc., 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado 80021. Below
is a description of each committee of the Board. Each of the committees has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or
consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Information on our website does not constitute part of this
document.
16
The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is primarily concerned with the effectiveness of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm, accounting policies and practices, financial reporting and internal controls. The Audit Committee acts pursuant
to its charter, and is authorized and directed, among other things, to: (1) appoint, retain, compensate, evaluate and terminate, as
appropriate, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (2) approve all audit engagement fees and terms, as
well as all permissible non-audit service engagements with the independent registered public accounting firm; (3) discuss with
management and the independent registered public accounting firm and meet to review the Company’s annual audited financial
statements and quarterly financial statements, including reviewing the Company’s disclosures under “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC;
(4) review reports by the independent registered public accounting firm describing its internal quality control procedures and all
relationships between the Company, or individuals in financial reporting oversight roles at the Company, and the independent
registered public accounting firm; (5) establish procedures, as required under applicable law, for the receipt, retention and treatment
of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential
and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; (6) monitor the
rotation of partners of the independent auditors on the Company’s audit engagement team as required by law; (7) review and
approve or reject transactions between the Company and any related persons in accordance with the Company’s Related Party
Transactions Policy; (8) confer with management and the independent auditors regarding the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting; (9) oversee management’s efforts to monitor compliance with the Company’s programs and policies designed
to ensure adherence to applicable laws and regulations and the Company’s Code of Ethics; (10) annually prepare a report as
required by the SEC to be included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; and (11) discuss policies with respect to risk
assessment and risk management.
The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Sorte, Chair, and Messrs. Redmond, Sewell and Vaughn. The Board has
determined that each of Messrs. Redmond, Sorte, and Sewell qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the
SEC’s rules and regulations adopted pursuant to the Exchange Act, and that all of the members of the Audit Committee are
“independent” as defined by the NYSE’s listing standards and the rules of the SEC applicable to audit committee members. The
Audit Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2020.
17
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Management is responsible for the Company’s accounting practices, internal control over financial reporting, the financial
reporting process and preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. The Audit Committee’s
responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm, including a discussion of the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness
of significant judgments, the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee further discussed with the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed under the rules adopted by the PCAOB, as well as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures
and letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the
Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm, and were satisfied with, that firm’s independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee
has also considered whether the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to
the Company is compatible with the auditors’ independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditor and independent registered public accounting firm the
overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. In addition, the Audit
Committee meets with the internal auditor, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination and
evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also reviewed and discussed
Company policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.
Based upon the Audit Committee’s discussion with management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements as of
and for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2020 for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee
John F. Sorte, Chair
John T. Redmond
D. Bruce Sewell
Peter A. Vaughn
18
The Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to its charter and is authorized and directed, among other things, to: (1) review
and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluate the Chief Executive
Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives (including the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in fostering a
culture of ethics and integrity), and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the
Board), determine and approve the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level based on this evaluation; (2) review the
performance of, make recommendations (where appropriate) with respect to, and approve the total compensation for the executive
officers of the Company other than the CEO, including any amendments to such executive’s employment agreement, any proposed
severance arrangements or change in control and similar agreements/provisions, and any amendments, supplements or waivers
to the foregoing agreements; (3) oversee the Company’s overall compensation structure, policies and programs for executive
officers and employees, including assessing the incentives and risks arising from or related to the Company’s compensation
programs and plans, and assessing whether the incentives and risks are appropriate; (4) review and approve the Company’s incentive
compensation and equity-based plans and approve changes to such plans, in each case subject, where appropriate, to stockholder
or Board approval, and review and approve issuances of equity securities to employees of the Company; (5) review and recommend
to the Board annual retainer and meeting fees for non-employee members of the Board and committees of the Board, fix the terms
and awards of stock compensation for such members of the Board and determine the terms, if any, upon which such fees may be
deferred; (6) produce a compensation committee report on executive officer compensation as required by the SEC, after the
committee reviews and discusses with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or “CD&A,” and
consider whether to recommend that it be included in the Company’s proxy statement or Annual Report; and (7) consider and
recommend to the Board the frequency of the Company’s advisory vote on executive compensation.
The members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Decker, Chair, Mmes. Rawlinson, Romanow and Schneider and
Mr. Sorte. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” as defined by the
NYSE’s listing standards. In addition, the Compensation Committee consists of “non-employee directors,” within the meaning
of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act and “outside directors,” within the meaning of regulations promulgated under
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee
held five meetings during fiscal 2020.
Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures
The Compensation Committee meets as often as necessary to carry out its responsibilities. The agenda for each meeting is
usually developed by the Chair of the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief
Executive Officer does not participate in and is not present during any deliberations or determinations of the Compensation
Committee regarding his compensation or individual performance objectives. The charter of the Compensation Committee grants
the Compensation Committee sole authority, at the expense of the Company, to retain or to obtain advice from a compensation
consultant, legal counsel or other adviser to assist in the execution of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities. The
Compensation Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any consultant
or adviser retained and has authority to approve the fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee expects that it
will seek advice from independent compensation consultants as it deems necessary on a periodic basis, but not necessarily annually,
in order to determine that the Company’s compensation programs remain appropriate and consistent with industry practices. Prior
to the retention of any compensation consultant, legal counsel or any other external adviser, the Compensation Committee will
assess the independence of such adviser from management, taking into consideration all factors relevant to such adviser’s
independence, including factors specified in the NYSE listing standards.
During fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged Aon plc., a multinational, multi-services insurance and consulting
firm, which we refer to as Aon, as its independent compensation consultant. Aon was retained by the Compensation Committee
to review the Company’s executive compensation programs, including an analysis relating to the compensation of our Chief
Executive Officer and the Company’s performance and a risk assessment of our compensation programs.
In fiscal 2020, Aon was paid $94,634 for these executive compensation consulting services provided to the Compensation
Committee. During fiscal 2020, Aon and its affiliates provided general health and benefits consulting, actuarial consulting services
and other human resource related services to the Company. The decision to engage Aon and its affiliates for these additional
services was made by management as part of the Company’s existing relationship with Aon concerning these services, and was
not approved, or required to be approved, by the Compensation Committee or the Board. Fees for the foregoing additional services
in fiscal 2020 were $82,000. The individuals at Aon that advise the Compensation Committee on executive compensation matters
have no involvement in the other services provided to the Company by Aon and its affiliates, and the individuals at Aon advising
the Compensation Committee report directly to, and are overseen by, the Compensation Committee. These individuals have no
other relationship with the Company or management. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Aon as
19
required by the NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee reviewed its relationship with Aon and considered all
relevant factors, and concluded that there are no conflicts of interest raised by the work performed by Aon and its affiliates.
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees, as appropriate, and
the Chief Executive Officer has been granted authority to grant certain equity based awards for hiring incentive grants, correction
grants or to promoted non-executive employees. The purpose of this delegation of authority is to enhance the flexibility of equity
administration within the Company and to facilitate the timely grant of equity awards to new or recently promoted non-executive
employees within specified limits approved by the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer’s authority to make
new hire incentive grants is limited by the restrictions established by the Compensation Committee.
Historically, the Compensation Committee has made adjustments to annual compensation, determined annual cash and
equity awards, and established new performance objectives at one or more meetings held during the first quarter of the fiscal year.
However, the Compensation Committee also considers matters related to individual compensation, such as compensation for new
executive hires, at various times as needed throughout the year. Generally, the Compensation Committee’s process comprises two
related elements: the determination of compensation levels and the establishment of performance objectives for the fiscal year.
For executives other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers evaluations and
recommendations submitted to the committee by the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee makes all final
determinations regarding these awards, and none of our executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, are involved in
the determination of their own compensation. In the case of the Chief Executive Officer, the evaluation of his performance is
conducted by the Compensation Committee, which determines any adjustments to his compensation as well as awards to be
granted. The non-management directors’ practice is to meet in executive session following the Board meeting in September of
each year to review and ratify the Compensation Committee’s annual review of the Chief Executive Officer. For all executives
and directors, as part of its deliberations, the Compensation Committee may review and consider, as appropriate, materials such
as financial reports and projections, operational data, tax and accounting information, tally sheets that set forth the total
compensation that may become payable to executives in various hypothetical scenarios, executive and director stock ownership
information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide
compensation levels, and recommendations of the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, including analyses of
executive and director compensation paid at other companies identified by the consultant.
The specific determinations of the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for fiscal 2020 are
described in greater detail in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of this proxy statement, as well as the narrative
disclosure that accompanies the Summary Compensation Table and related tables in the Executive Compensation section of this
proxy statement.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2020, no Compensation Committee interlocks existed between the Company and any other entity, meaning
none of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the compensation committee
or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation
Committee. No member of our Compensation Committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
contained in this Proxy Statement. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the
Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020.
Compensation Committee
Susan L. Decker, Chair
Nadia Rawlinson
Michele Romanow
Hilary A. Schneider
John F. Sorte
20
The Nominating & Governance Committee
The Nominating & Governance Committee acts pursuant to its charter and is authorized and directed to: (1) review the
overall composition of the Board; (2) actively seek individuals qualified to become Board members for recommendation to the
Board; (3) identify and recommend to the Board director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders and members of
the Board to serve on the various committees of the Board; (4) oversee the evaluation of the performance of the Board and oversee
the annual self-evaluation process of the Board and each committee; (5) review and reassess the adequacy of the Corporate
Governance Guidelines of the Company and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval; (6) review and present
to the Board individual director candidates recommended for the committee’s consideration by stockholders and stockholder
nominations for director that are made in writing to the Secretary of the Company in compliance with the Company’s Bylaws;
and (7) review and present to the Board stockholder proposals. The Nominating & Governance Committee also has the authority
to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify candidates and to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention
terms.
The members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are Mr. Sewell, Chair, Ms. Decker and Mr. Sorte. The Board
has determined that all members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are “independent” as defined by the NYSE’s listing
standards. The Nominating & Governance Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2020.
The Executive Committee
The Executive Committee has all powers and rights necessary to exercise the full authority of the Board during the intervals
between meetings of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company, subject to certain limitations set
forth in the charter of the Executive Committee. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Katz, Sewell and Sorte.
The Executive Committee held numerous discussions, but no formal meetings during fiscal 2020.
21
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2020
The following table provides information concerning the compensation of our non-employee directors in fiscal 2020:
Name(1)
Susan L. Decker(5)
Roland Hernandez(6)
Nadia Rawlinson(7)
John T. Redmond(8)
Michele Romanow(9)
Hilary A. Schneider(10)
D. Bruce Sewell(11)
John F. Sorte(12)
Peter A. Vaughn(13)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
70,000
30,896
24,995
60,000
61,246
56,667
103,334
86,668
59,018
207,635
—
167,895
207,635
207,635
207,635
207,635
207,635
207,635
—
—
—
12,510
—
—
—
11,222
4,000
277,635
30,896
192,890
280,145
268,881
264,302
310,969
305,525
270,653
(1)
(2)
Mr. Katz is also a named executive officer and his compensation as Chief Executive Officer is included in the Summary Compensation Table in the
“Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Katz does not receive any additional compensation for his service on the Board.
Consists of non-employee director annual retainers and meeting fees, and, if applicable, lead director fees, committee chair fees, and committee
member and meeting fees. Effective April 1, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board of Directors elected to forgo their cash
compensation for a period of six months. Accordingly, cash compensation paid to each director in fiscal 2020 were as follows:
Committees
Board of
Directors
Audit Compensation
Nominating &
Governance Executive
Board
Service
($)
50,000
25,747
24,253
50,000
54,579
50,000
76,667
50,000
50,000
Committee
Service
($)
—
5,149
—
10,000
—
—
10,000
16,667
4,851
Committee
Service
($)
13,333
—
742
—
6,667
6,667
—
6,667
4,167
Committee
Service
($)
Committee
Service
($)
6,667
—
—
—
—
—
10,000
6,667
—
—
—
—
—
—
6,667
6,667
—
Total
($)
70,000
30,896
24,995
60,000
61,246
56,667
103,334
86,668
59,018
Name
Susan L. Decker
Roland Hernandez(a)
Nadia Rawlinson(b)
John T. Redmond
Michele Romanow(c)
Hilary A. Schneider
D. Bruce Sewell
John F. Sorte
Peter A. Vaughn(d)
Effective December 5, 2019, Mr. Hernandez resigned from the Board of Directors.
Effective December 5, 2019, Ms. Rawlinson joined the Board of Directors and effective March 5, 2020, she joined the Compensation
(a)
(b)
Committee.
(c)
Ms. Romanow resigned from the Board of Directors of Whistler Blackcomb Holdings, Inc.
(d)
Includes $4,578.76 retainer fee for service on the Board of Directors of Whistler Blackcomb Holdings, Inc. Effective January 16, 2020,
Effective December 5, 2019, Mr. Vaughn left the Compensation Committee and joined the Audit Committee.
(3)
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during fiscal 2020 computed in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.
(4)
All other compensation for fiscal 2020 includes the following:
22
Name
Susan L. Decker
Roland Hernandez
Nadia Rawlinson
John T. Redmond
Michele Romanow
Hilary A. Schneider
D. Bruce Sewell
John F. Sorte
Peter A. Vaughn
Charitable
Donations
($)(a)
Company-paid Lodging,
Ski School Privileges and
Discretionary Spending on
Goods and Services
($)(b)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4,000
—
—
—
12,510
—
—
—
11,222
—
Total
($)
—
—
—
12,510
—
—
—
11,222
4,000
(a)
(b)
See below under “Limited Director Perquisites and Personal Benefits” for a description of this program.
Represents the amounts reported during fiscal 2020 that were used by a director towards lodging, ski school privileges and discretionary
spending on services or goods at our properties for personal use. See below under “Limited Director Perquisites and Personal Benefits” for
a description of this program. In accordance with SEC rules, the value of these benefits is measured on the basis of the estimated aggregate
incremental cost to the Company for providing these benefits, and perquisites and personal benefits are not reported for any director for
whom such amounts were less than $10,000 in the aggregate for the fiscal year.
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
As of July 31, 2020, Ms. Decker held 910 unvested RSUs.
Mr. Hernandez resigned from the Company’s Board effective December 5, 2019.
As of July 31, 2020, Mrs. Rawlinson held 738 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Mr. Redmond held and 910 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Ms. Romanow held 910 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Ms. Schneider held 910 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Mr. Sewell held 910 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Mr. Sorte held 910 unvested RSUs.
As of July 31, 2020, Mr. Vaughn held 910 unvested RSUs.
DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION
All of our non-employee directors receive annual cash fees, payable in quarterly installments. The annual cash retainer for
each Board member is $75,000 and no additional per meeting fees are paid. In addition, the Lead Director of the Board receives
an additional $40,000 per year and the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $25,000 per year. Each other Audit
Committee member receives an additional $15,000 per year, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an additional
$20,000 per year, the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee receives an additional $15,000 per year, and each
other Compensation Committee member and Nominating & Governance Committee member receives an additional $10,000 each
per year. Members of the Executive Committee receive an additional $10,000 per year. A non-executive Chairman of the Board
would receive an additional annual retainer of $50,000, but our Chief Executive Officer is currently our Chairman of the Board
and he is not entitled to this retainer. Effective April 1, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board of Directors
elected to forgo their cash compensation for a period of six months.
All directors received reimbursement of their reasonable travel expenses in connection with their service.
DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION
The Company provides its non-employee directors with equity compensation as determined each year by the Compensation
Committee, which for fiscal 2020, was $207,635 for each non-employee director, consisting of 910 RSUs granted on September 25,
2019 that vested one year from the date of grant. The aggregate grant date fair value of these RSUs is set forth under the “Stock
Awards” column of the Director Compensation Table and described in footnote 3 above.
23
LIMITED DIRECTOR PERQUISITES AND PERSONAL BENEFITS
Non-employee directors receive benefits consisting of lodging, ski school privileges and discretionary spending on services
or goods at our resorts for personal use in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Perquisite Fund Program. Each director
is entitled to an annual $40,000 allowance to be used at the Company’s resorts in accordance with such program, under which
directors may draw against the account to pay for services or goods at the market rate. Unused funds in each director’s account
at the end of each fiscal year are forfeited. In accordance with SEC rules, the value of these benefits is measured on the basis of
the estimated aggregate incremental cost to the Company. For this purpose, perquisites do not include benefits generally available
on a non-discriminatory basis to all of our employees, such as skiing privileges.
In addition, each year we allow each director to designate one charity as the recipient of a vacation package with a retail
value of no more than $4,000 and to include only the same array of services that are eligible under the Perquisite Fund Program.
We also require that the package be given as part of a public event, dinner or auction and that the Company receive appropriate
credit and marketing presence.
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
Each non-employee director must own the greater of five times his or her annual cash retainer for Board service or $300,000
in value within five years of the date such director is elected or appointed to the Board. Directors are not permitted to sell any
shares of common stock (except to pay the exercise price of a particular equity grant, if any, or taxes generated as a result of equity
grants) until such time as the ownership guidelines have been satisfied and then only to the extent that such sales do not reduce
such director’s ownership below the threshold requirement. Shares of common stock, stock owned in a directed retirement plan
or IRA and the intrinsic value of vested equity grants count as stock ownership for purposes of these guidelines. All of our non-
employee directors are in compliance with this policy.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more
than 10% of our common stock, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. To our
knowledge, based solely on a review of the reports filed by or on behalf of our directors and executive officers and written
representations from these persons that no other reports were required, we believe that during fiscal 2020 our directors, executive
officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock filed the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a), except
Ms. Decker who did not timely report 240 shares gifted in October 2018 due to an administrative error.
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES
We have adopted a written Related Party Transactions Policy that sets forth the Company’s policies and procedures
regarding the identification, review, consideration and approval or ratification of “related party transactions.” For purposes of our
policy only, a “related party transaction” is a transaction, contract, agreement, understanding, loan, advance or guarantee (or any
series of similar transactions or arrangements) in which the Company and any “related person” are participants involving an
amount that exceeds $120,000. Transactions involving compensation for services provided to the Company solely in their capacity
as an officer or director by a related person are not covered by this policy. A related person is any executive officer, director, or
more than 5% stockholder of the Company, or any immediate family member of an executive officer or director, including any
entity in which such persons are an officer or 10% or greater equity holder.
Under the policy, where a transaction has been identified as a related party transaction, management must present information
regarding the proposed related party transaction to the Chair of the Audit Committee, the full Audit Committee or the Board for
consideration and approval or ratification, depending upon the size of the transaction involved. In considering related party
transactions, the Audit Committee takes into account the fairness of the proposed transaction to the Company and whether the
terms of such transaction are at least as favorable to the Company as it would receive or be likely to receive from an unrelated
third party in a comparable or substantially comparable transaction.
To ensure that our existing procedures are successful in identifying related party transactions, the Company distributed
questionnaires to its directors and executive officers shortly following the end of the fiscal year which included, among other
things, inquiries about any transactions they have entered into with us.
24
During fiscal 2020 and through the date of this Proxy Statement, there were no related party transactions under the relevant
standards described above.
25
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, describes our executive compensation program, the various
components of our program and the compensation-related decisions made for fiscal 2020 with respect to our named executive
officers (“NEOs”). For purposes of this CD&A and the compensation tables and narratives that follow, the NEOs for fiscal 2020
were:
Robert A. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
•
• Michael Z. Barkin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
•
•
•
Patricia A. Campbell, President - Mountain Division
Kirsten A. Lynch, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
David T. Shapiro, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Recent Developments Affecting Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2021 Compensation
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the global economy and strained the hospitality and leisure industries
due to travel restrictions and stay-at-home directives that have resulted in cancellations and significantly reduced travel. As a
result of COVID-19 and in order to ensure the safety of our guests and employees, we decided to close all North American mountain
resorts and our associated businesses on March 15, 2020 and shortly thereafter announced that such resorts would remain closed
for the remainder of the 2020 season.
In order to provide liquidity and preserve financial flexibility, we took various measures, including:
•
•
•
•
Reducing our capital plan for calendar year 2020 by approximately $80-$85 million, with the vast majority of these
savings coming from the deferral of many of our discretionary capital projects (new chair lifts, terrain expansions
and other mountain base area improvements), while continuing with the vast majority of our maintenance capital
spending;
Suspending cash dividends to shareholders for two quarters (preserving over $140 million);
Amending our corporate credit facility to obtain temporary covenant waivers and issuing $600 million of senior
unsecured notes; and
Furloughing the majority of year-round hourly employees and many full time employees in the U.S.
Additionally, effective April 1, 2020, we took the following compensation actions:
•
•
•
Implementing six month salary reductions for all salaried employees in the U.S.;
CEO foregoing full salary and Board of Directors foregoing 100% of cash compensation for six months; and
Suspending our 401k match for six months.
Finally, as explained further below, with respect to our Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) for fiscal 2020, the Resort
EBITDA target was not met, and accordingly, none of our NEOs received a bonus for fiscal 2020.
While it is not reasonably possible to estimate the ultimate duration or negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
on our business, we expect the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to have an effect on our results of operations and our results
will be adversely impacted in a significant manner. However, the Compensation Committee believes that both our short-term and
long-term success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified talent throughout all areas of operations,
including our NEOs, who are motivated to serve with purpose on behalf of our Company, our team members and our shareholders.
Many of our furloughed employees have now returned to work, and base salaries that were reduced were restored to their pre-
reduction levels effective early October 2020. Additionally, for fiscal 2021, the following actions were taken for our NEOs:
•
•
•
Base salaries were restored to their pre-reduction levels effective early October 2020, however, no merit increases
were given for fiscal 2021;
No annual inflation increases in long-term incentive grant values (RSUs and SARs) were approved;
For Messrs. Katz and Barkin and Mmes. Campbell and Lynch, in light of the financial and other uncertainties
surrounding our business and resort operations, these executives declined a cash bonus for FY21, and instead these
executives received a non-cash grant of SARs in value equal to 90% of his or her target bonus amount, with one-
26
year vesting and an exercise price that is 10% greater than the closing price of our common stock on the date of
grant.
Additionally, for fiscal 2021, for the third consecutive year, our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Katz, voluntarily offered to reduce
his compensation from what was recommended by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Katz offered to reduce the value of his
long-term incentive award (RSUs and SARs) granted in fiscal 2019, from approximately $4 million (the total grant date value of
his RSU and SAR grant for fiscal 2018, excluding the RSUs award as part of his bonus) to approximately $2 million. For fiscal
2020 and again in fiscal 2021, Mr. Katz made the suggestion to the Compensation Committee to maintain these reduced levels of
equity grant values in order to ensure that the Company could prioritize other compensation initiatives for the fiscal year and in
recognition of his own ownership in the Company’s stock, built over the prior 14 years.
Executive Summary of our Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program, which is grounded in the principle of pay-for-performance, is intended to reward our
executive officers for sustained, high-level performance over the short- and long-term as demonstrated by measurable, company-
wide performance metrics and individual contributions that are consistent with our overall growth strategy and achievement of
goals. We compensate our executive officers with a combination of cash compensation (in the form of base salary and cash incentive
compensation) and equity awards, as well as a modest amount of benefits and perquisites. Our compensation program has been
structured to enhance our ability to achieve our short-term and long-term strategic goals and to retain and motivate our executive
officers and senior management to achieve such goals.
Our Executive Compensation Program Emphasizes Pay-for-Performance
The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to emphasize pay-for-performance by incentivizing our
executive officers to drive superior results and generate stockholder value. We accomplish this objective in the following ways:
•
•
•
Annual Incentive Awards. Our MIP, which applies to the award of annual cash incentive compensation, referred
to in this CD&A as a “MIP award,” is intended to focus our executive officers on the key corporate financial
metrics that we believe drive our best results. As explained in more detail below, because Resort EBITDA
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as reported for our Mountain and Lodging
segments) is the performance metric associated with the MIP for our NEOs, their annual cash incentive fluctuates
with our performance and the achievement of our annual goals as established by the Compensation Committee.
Long-Term Equity Awards. A significant portion of our NEOs’ total annual compensation opportunity is in the
form of long-term equity incentive compensation, including share appreciation rights (“SARs”) and restricted
share units (“RSUs”), which generally vest ratably over three years.
High Percentage of Compensation is Variable or “At-Risk.” A significant percentage of our NEOs’
compensation is tied to incentives or appreciation in our stock price, and as executive officers attain greater
levels of responsibility, the percentage of their total target compensation that is variable or “at-risk” increases,
and the percentage that is fixed decreases. Accordingly, the NEO whose compensation is most heavily comprised
of at-risk elements is our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). Our commitment to emphasizing performance-
based compensation is illustrated by the following charts, which show the mix of our program’s three primary
direct compensation components (fixed compensation, consisting of base salary; variable or at-risk
compensation, consisting of target annual incentive compensation; and actual long-term equity incentive awards
granted in the fiscal year) for our CEO and, on average, for our other NEOs for fiscal 2020:
27
•
Performance-Based Stock Awards for CEO. In furtherance of our pay-for-performance philosophy and to further align
the interests of our CEO with the interests of our stockholders, the Compensation Committee has determined that
approximately 50% of the award value subject to long-term equity incentive awards granted to our CEO each fiscal year
(not including RSUs granted in payment of his annual MIP award, which are already tied to the performance metrics set
forth under the MIP) will be “performance-based” stock awards. These performance-based stock awards have been SARs
subject to time-based vesting criteria, but with an exercise price that is greater than the closing price of our common stock
on the date of grant (“Premium SARs”). For fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Katz long-term equity
incentive awards with approximately 50% of the award value in time-based vesting RSUs and approximately 50% of the
award value in Premium SARs only with an exercise price that was 25% greater than the closing price of our common
stock on the date of grant.
Our Executive Compensation Program is Supported by Our Stockholders
At our annual meeting of stockholders held on December 5, 2019, approximately 86% of the votes cast on the proposal were
voted in support of the advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our NEOs. After considering the results of this vote,
the Compensation Committee concluded that there is strong stockholder support of our executive compensation program and its
emphasis on pay-for-performance. As a result, the Compensation Committee determined to maintain the current executive
compensation program for fiscal 2020. At our 2017 annual meeting, our stockholders expressed a preference that advisory votes
on executive compensation occur every year, as recommended by our Board of Directors. Consistent with this preference, our
Board of Directors has implemented an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.
28
Effective Corporate Governance Reinforces Our Executive Compensation Program
The following features of our executive compensation program are evidence of our commitment to good corporate governance
practices:
WHAT WE DO:
WHAT WE DON’T DO:
Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive
Compensation. We provide our stockholders with an
annual opportunity to vote on an advisory basis to approve
the compensation paid to our NEOs as disclosed in the
proxy statement.
Independent Compensation Committee. Our executive
compensation program is reviewed annually by the
Compensation Committee, which consists solely of
independent directors and makes all final determinations
regarding the compensation of our NEOs.
Significant Portion of Executive Compensation Tied to
Performance. A significant portion of our NEOs’
compensation is comprised of elements of performance-
based, incentive compensation that are tied to defined
corporate and individual performance goals or stock price
performance. In the last three fiscal years, approximately
72.7% of our CEO’s total compensation and approximately
73.1% of our other NEOs’ total compensation, as reported
in the Summary Compensation Table, has on average been
in the form of short and long-term incentive-based
compensation (MIP award and equity awards). In addition,
approximately 50% of the long-term equity incentives
granted to our CEO each fiscal year consist of
“performance-based” awards in the form of Premium
SARs.
Significant Portion of Executive Compensation Delivered
in the Form of Long-Term Equity-Based Incentives. A
significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation is
comprised of long-term equity incentive awards, consisting
of SARs and RSUs, which generally vest over three years.
In the last three fiscal years, approximately 67.4% of our
CEO’s total compensation and approximately 66.2% of our
other NEOs’ total compensation as reported in the
Summary Compensation Table, has on average been in the
form of long-term equity-based incentives. Mr. Katz
receives 50% of his annual MIP award in cash and the
other 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three-year
period (included in the percentage above), meaning one-
half of the MIP award earned on the basis of the
Company’s achievement of annual performance goals is
subject to further time-based vesting and changes in the
value of our common stock over that period.
Market Alignment of Compensation but with Greater
Emphasis on At-Risk Compensation. To attract and retain
talented executive officers, we align targeted compensation
opportunity with comparable levels to our peer group, but
we generally make at-risk compensation a more significant
component.
Independent Compensation Consultant. The
Compensation Committee periodically retains and receives
advice from an independent compensation consultant.
No Excessive Perquisites. We provide our executive
officers with limited perquisites, which are generally
limited to credit at our owned and operated properties and
which are designed to incentivize our executive officers to
visit and use our resorts in order to make informed
decisions regarding our business and provide relevant
feedback concerning our properties and services.
No Tax Gross-Ups on Perquisites, Except for Standard
Relocation Benefits. We do not pay tax gross-ups on the
limited perquisites that our executive officers receive,
except in the case of standard relocation benefits available
to all similarly situated employees.
No Excise Tax Gross-Ups. We do not pay excise tax gross-
ups in connection with the change in control arrangements
provided to our executive officers.
No Automatic Salary Increases or Guaranteed
Bonuses. For fiscal 2020, we did not guarantee annual
salary increases or bonuses for any NEO and no
employment agreement with any NEO contains such
provisions. In fact, as described below, no cash bonus was
paid to any NEO during fiscal 2020.
No “Single Trigger” Automatic Cash Payments, Benefits
or Equity Vesting Upon a Change in Control. The change
in control arrangements provided to our executive officers
require a termination event (including a termination by the
executive for “good reason”) following a change in control
before any cash-based payments or benefits are triggered.
Additionally, our CEO’s potential cash severance is
conservatively set at two times his base salary and bonus.
For equity awards granted in fiscal 2021 and beyond, in the
event of a change in control, equity will only have
accelerated vesting if an award is not assumed or replaced
or in the event of a termination without cause within 12
months of a change in control event.
No Hedging or Pledging. Under our Insider Trading
Compliance Program, senior level employees, including
our executive officers, as well as our directors, are
prohibited from conducting short sales or using derivatives
or other instruments designed to hedge against the risk of
ownership of our securities or otherwise offset any decrease
in the market value of our securities, including put and call
options and collar transactions. The Insider Trading
Compliance Program also prohibits directors and senior
level employees, including our executive officers, from
pledging shares of the Company’s stock.
No Equity Repricing. We expressly prohibit the repricing
of underwater SARs without stockholder approval.
No Pension Plans or SERPs. We do not provide our
executive officers with tax-qualified defined benefit
pension plans or supplemental executive retirement plans.
29
WHAT WE DO:
Clawback Policy. The Compensation Committee has
adopted a clawback policy that, in the event of a financial
restatement, allows us to recoup cash- or equity-based
incentive compensation from executive officers that was
paid based on the misstated financial information.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our executive officers are
subject to stock ownership guidelines, requiring that they
hold a meaningful amount of our common stock, which
helps to align their interests with those of our stockholders.
Additionally, until the applicable guideline is achieved for
an executive, he or she is required to retain at least 75% of
the net shares received from vesting of RSUs or exercise of
SARs. All of our NEOs are in compliance with this policy.
Use of Tally Sheets. The Compensation Committee uses
tally sheets that provide information as to all compensation
that is potentially available to our NEOs when evaluating
executive compensation.
Annual Risk Assessment. The Compensation Committee,
with the assistance of our independent compensation
consultant, annually conducts a compensation risk
assessment and, for fiscal 2020, determined that the
Company’s compensation policies and practices, or
components thereof, do not create risks that are reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Key Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Program
Our executive compensation program focuses on the following three key objectives:
•
•
•
Emphasizing Pay-for-Performance. Emphasize pay-for-performance by
compensation incentives to achievement of specified performance objectives or overall stock performance.
tying annual and
long-term
Attracting, Retaining and Motivating. Attract, retain and motivate talented executives who will determine our
long-term success. We have structured our executive compensation program to be competitive with compensation
paid by companies in the same market for executive talent.
Rewarding Contributions and Creating Long-Term Value. We have structured our compensation program to
recognize and reward contributions of all employees, including executive officers, in achieving strategic goals
and business objectives, while aligning the program with stockholder interests.
Compensation-Setting Process
Participants in Setting Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of our executive officers, including our
NEOs. In appropriate circumstances, such as when new market data supports a market adjustment, the Compensation Committee,
in its sole discretion, considers the recommendations of our CEO in setting executive compensation, including the compensation
of the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee, however, makes all final determinations regarding these awards (subject to
any matters requiring approval by the Board of Directors and/or our stockholders), and no executive officer is involved in the
deliberations or the determination with respect to his or her own compensation. The non-management directors’ practice is to meet
in executive session following the Board meeting in September of each year to review and ratify the Compensation Committee’s
annual review of the CEO.
Comparative Framework
To achieve our executive compensation objectives, the Compensation Committee periodically analyzes market data and
evaluates individual executive performance with a goal of setting compensation at levels the Compensation Committee believes,
based on their general business and industry knowledge and experience, are comparable with executives in other companies
operating in the leisure, travel, gaming and hospitality industries, which we refer to as our “peer group.” We face a somewhat
30
unique challenge in establishing a peer group because few publicly-traded companies participate in more than one of our operating
segments. Thus, when evaluating executive compensation, the Compensation Committee includes in our peer group a variety of
leisure, travel, gaming and hospitality companies with whom we may compete for executive talent and the discretionary travel
dollars of our guests.
When performing its annual executive compensation review, the Compensation Committee has sole authority to engage
an independent compensation consultant to assist in obtaining market data and analyzing the competitive nature of our compensation
programs. In fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged Aon plc (“Aon”) to conduct a risk assessment and to advise on
compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Aon as required by the NYSE listing
rules. The Compensation Committee reviewed its relationship with Aon and considered all relevant factors, and concluded that
there are no conflicts of interest raised by the work performed by Aon.
In fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee engaged Aon to conduct a competitive market study of the Company’s
executive compensation program. The market study analyzed our executive compensation relative to Aon’s proprietary survey
data, which consisted of companies with comparable revenues, as well as to publicly-traded peer group companies recommended
by Aon. Our Compensation Committee then confirmed a peer group based upon this data. The peer group used by the Compensation
Committee for fiscal 2020 compensation decisions did not change from the peer group determined in fiscal 2019 and consisted
of the following companies:
Boyd Gaming Corporation
Caesars Entertainment Corp.
Cedar Fair, L.P.
Churchill Downs Inc.
Extended Stay America, Inc.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
Penn National Gaming Inc.
Red Rock Resorts Inc.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
Wyndham Destinations, Inc.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
The Compensation Committee primarily uses the proprietary survey data from Aon to set target pay levels for competitive
and retention purposes. The Compensation Committee then uses peer group information generally to confirm target pay levels for
our NEOs are comparable with companies in our peer group. However, as compared with companies in our peer group, we generally
make at-risk compensation a more significant component of our NEOs’ compensation in order to emphasize pay-for-performance.
We believe that compensating our NEOs with a larger proportion of at-risk compensation elements (such as the MIP award, SARs
and RSUs) in relation to more static compensation elements (such as base salary) and a larger proportion of long-term equity
incentives (such as SARs and RSUs) in relation to short-term compensation elements (such as base salary and the MIP award),
compared with the peer group, more closely aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee intends to continue to seek advice from independent compensation consultants as it deems
necessary to help ensure that our compensation programs remain appropriate and consistent with industry practices. Although the
Compensation Committee believes that it is important to periodically review the compensation policies of its peer group and the
survey data, the Compensation Committee also believes that our executive compensation program must further our business
objectives and be consistent with our culture. Therefore, while the Compensation Committee reviews the peer group and survey
data, including the total and type of compensation paid to executive officers at peer group companies to further validate that the
compensation paid to our executive officers remains competitive, the Compensation Committee may not necessarily make any
particular adjustments to the compensation paid to the executive officers based on the peer group or survey data.
Company-Specific Factors
In addition to considering market data with respect to executive compensation practices of companies within our peer group,
the Compensation Committee takes into account individual performance, our retention needs, our relative performance and our
own strategic goals. We also conduct an annual review of the aggregate level of our executive compensation program as part of
our annual budget review and annual performance review processes, which include determining the operating metrics and non-
financial elements used to measure our performance and to compensate our executive officers.
The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with data and recommendations provided by our independent compensation
consultant in any given year, also annually analyzes tally sheets prepared for each NEO. These tally sheets present the dollar
amount of each component of the NEO’s compensation, including current cash compensation (base salary and the MIP award for
the applicable fiscal year), perquisites and the value of equity awards previously granted to the NEO as of the applicable fiscal
year end, as well as the amounts that would have been payable to the NEO if employment had been terminated under various
scenarios as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year. The Compensation Committee uses these tally sheets, which
provide substantially the same information as is provided in the tables included in this proxy statement, together with peer group
data, primarily for purposes of analyzing our NEOs’ total compensation and determining whether it is appropriate to adjust the
compensation mix for our NEOs on a going-forward basis. In its most recent review of tally sheets, the Compensation Committee
31
determined that total compensation amounts for our NEOs remained consistent with our executive compensation philosophy and
objectives.
Elements of Compensation
Our executive compensation program consists of the following elements:
Compensation
Element
Base Salary
Objective
To attract and retain
executives with a proven
track record of performance
Annual MIP
Award
To incentivize achievement
of annual financial,
operational and strategic
goals and achievement of
individual annual
performance objectives
Equity Incentive
Awards
To increase long-term
stockholder value by
retaining our executive
officers in a competitive
business environment and
aligning the interests of our
executive officers with
those of our stockholders
by encouraging stock
ownership by such officers
Key Features
• Established based primarily on the scope of an executive officer’s
responsibilities, taking into account individual performance and experience,
competitive market compensation for similar positions, as well as seniority
of the individual, our ability to replace the individual, the impact the
individual’s loss would have on the Company, and other factors which may
be deemed to be relevant by the Compensation Committee.
• Reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and, based on such
review, may be adjusted to align salaries with market levels after taking into
account various factors, including those listed in the bullet above.
• No guaranteed increases to base salary.
• For each fiscal year, Company and individual performance elements drive
two different aspects of the MIP: (1) the aggregate amount of funds available
under the MIP (driven by Company performance), and (2) the specific
allocation of awards to participants under the MIP (driven by Company
performance for Mr. Katz and individual performance for the other NEOs).
• Our CEO receives his annual MIP award 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that
vest annually over a three-year period (as further discussed under Equity
Incentive Awards below). Our other executive officers receive annual MIP
awards in cash only.
• Current equity incentive awards are granted under our 2015 Omnibus Incentive
Plan, referred to in this proxy statement as the 2015 Plan, previously approved
by stockholders at the 2015 annual meeting.
• Equity awards granted prior to the 2015 annual meeting were granted under
our Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan,
referred to in this proxy statement as the 2002 Plan, previously approved by
the stockholders.
• For fiscal 2020, we used grants of time-based vesting RSUs and SARs because
RSUs and SARs provide both a high perceived value and strong retention
value. The use of RSUs aligns the interests of our executive officers with
that of our stockholders through stock ownership.
• The Compensation Committee has adopted a long-term equity-based incentive
grant practice for Mr. Katz, such that approximately 50% of his equity awards
will be performance-based. For fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee
awarded Mr. Katz his long-term equity incentive awards as approximately
50% of the award value in RSUs and approximately 50% of the award value
in Premium SARs, which consisted of 4,768 RSUs and 22,827 Premium
SARs, each vesting annually over three years.
• For equity awards granted in fiscal 2021 and beyond, in the event of a change
in control, equity will only have accelerated vesting if an award is not assumed
or replaced or in the event of a termination without cause within 12 months
of a change in control event.
• SARs are granted with an exercise price of no less than the closing price of
our common stock on the date of grant (and in some cases as noted above
with respect to Mr. Katz, with an exercise price that exceeds the fair market
value on the date of grant), and as a result, executive officers realize value
only to the extent the price of our common stock appreciates after the grant
date.
32
Compensation
Element
Deferred
Compensation
Limited
Perquisites
Objective
To attract and retain
executive officers with a
proven track record of
performance and to provide
a tax-efficient means for
such officers to save for
retirement
To incentivize executives to
use the Company’s services
in order to help them in
their performance by
allowing them to evaluate
our resorts and services
based upon firsthand
knowledge
Key Features
• Executive officers can elect to defer up to 80% of their base salary and 100%
of their annual MIP award.
• Executive officers can invest these amounts in pre-tax dollars in designated
hypothetical investments for their accounts, and their accounts are credited
with gains or losses in accordance with their selections.
• Includes benefits relating to the use of one or more of our owned and operated
private clubs, including skiing and parking privileges, as a part of their
responsibilities and employment.
• Also includes our Perquisite Fund Program, under which certain of our senior
management, receive an annual allowance, based on executive level, to be
used at the Company’s owned or operated resorts. Executives may draw
against the account to pay for services or goods, at the market rate for the
applicable resort or services. Amounts of the fund used by executives are
taxed as ordinary income, like other compensation. Unused funds in each
executive’s account at the end of each fiscal year are forfeited.
• All Company employees enjoy skiing privileges, not just our executives.
2020 Compensation Decisions
As discussed above, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the global economy and strained the hospitality and
leisure industries due to travel restrictions and stay-at-home directives that have resulted in cancellations and significantly reduced
travel. Accordingly, on April 1, 2020, we announced additional measures taken to provide liquidity and preserve financial flexibility,
which included, among other things, (i) implementing six month salary reductions for all salaried employees in the U.S., including
our NEOs, (ii) CEO foregoing full salary and Board of Directors foregoing 100% of cash compensation for six months, and (iii)
suspending our 401k match for six months.
Base Salary
The Compensation Committee generally reviews and adjusts base salaries annually at its September committee meeting, with
new salaries effective in mid-October. In recognition of individual performance and overall growth and results of the Company
in fiscal 2019, fiscal 2020 base salary increases of 3.5% were approved for all NEOs. The below table reflects to the total annual
base salaries for each of our NEOs (fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2020) as well as the actual salaries paid during fiscal 2020
factoring in the April 1, 2020 salary reduction described above.
Name
Robert A. Katz. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Michael Z. Barkin . . . . . . . . . . .
Patricia A. Campbell . . . . . . . . .
Kirsten A. Lynch . . . . . . . . . . . .
David T. Shapiro . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal 2020
Base Salary
$ 1,002,079
569,250
$
569,250
$
569,250
$
517,500
$
Fiscal 2020
Actual Salary
Paid
688,534
522,500
522,500
522,500
482,962
$
$
$
$
$
Fiscal 2019
Base Salary
$ 968,192
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 550,000
$ 500,000
Annual MIP Awards. All of our NEOs were eligible to receive an annual cash MIP award based upon our performance and,
except for the CEO, each NEO’s individual performance during fiscal 2020. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Katz’s
MIP award would be paid 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three-year period.
Annual Funding of the MIP. Annual funding of the MIP is based upon our achievement of performance measures selected
by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has established Resort EBITDA as the performance measure to
determine funding of the MIP for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee believes this is the appropriate performance measure
because Resort EBITDA is the primary performance metric used by the Company to measure its performance. For purposes of
setting annual funding targets under the MIP, the Compensation Committee bases the Resort EBITDA target on the target set by
our Board annually when approving the Company’s budget. In setting the performance measures for any given fiscal year, the
Compensation Committee considers our past performance, broader economic trends that may impact us in the upcoming year,
and our historical performance in relation to the MIP award targets set in the respective prior periods.
33
Please see pages 37 and 49 of our Annual Report for information regarding our use of the non-GAAP financial measures
discussed in this CD&A and a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measures and their most directly
comparable GAAP financial measures. The threshold, target and maximum value of the MIP awards granted to our NEOs in fiscal
2019 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table and are further described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
Resort EBITDA Target. For fiscal 2020, the Resort EBITDA target was set at $798.0 million, which was based upon our
approved budget for fiscal 2020. This target includes Peak Resorts, but excludes (i) any EBITDA and related acquisition and
transaction expenses associated with any acquisitions completed or signed during fiscal 2020, (ii) the impact of any exercises of
SARs by the CEO during the fiscal year, and (iii) the impact of any currency fluctuations on the Company’s results. The
Compensation Committee established the performance measure in September 2019, at the beginning of the fiscal year, with the
expectation that the target level of performance of these goals would require significant effort and substantial progress toward our
strategic plan goals in light of the business environment at that time. As a result, at the time of grant, our attainment of these targets
in fiscal 2020 was considered moderately likely.
How the MIP Is Funded. For fiscal 2020, for each NEO, 100% of the funding of the MIP was based upon the achievement
of the Resort EBITDA target. Under the MIP, if we achieve 100% of the Resort EBITDA target, the MIP is funded at 100% of the
target funding level for that component, as more fully detailed in the table below. If our performance exceeds 100% of the Resort
EBITDA target, the MIP is funded above the target funding level for that component up to a maximum of 200% of the target
funding level. If our performance falls below 100% of the annual Resort EBITDA target, the MIP is funded below the target
funding level for that component. If our performance falls below 80% of the annual Resort EBITDA target, the MIP is not funded
for that component. The following table describes this metric:
MIP Funding for Resort EBITDA
Percentage of Target
Performance Achieved
Less than 80%
80%
90%
95%
100%
110%
120% or greater
Percentage of Annual Target Funding
Level Available under the MIP
—%
15%
25%
50%
100%
175%
200%
In the event our Resort EBITDA for any fiscal year meets the specific threshold or target level, then the MIP is funded at
the appropriate level and each NEO is eligible to receive a MIP award. In addition, once the MIP is funded based upon each NEO’s
target MIP award percentage, the total pool for NEOs may be increased by up to 5%, with such excess being paid out, if any, at
the discretion of the Compensation Committee based upon individual performance.
Target Annual MIP Awards. The differences between the NEOs’ target MIP awards as a percentage of their base salaries
was determined based upon the perceived ability each executive position has to influence our performance. Threshold, target and
maximum awards payable under the MIP for fiscal 2020 are reported in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. For fiscal 2020,
each NEO was eligible for an annual MIP award based on a percentage of annual base salary as follows:
Name
Robert A. Katz . . . . . . . . . . .
Michael Z. Barkin. . . . . . . . .
Patricia A. Campbell. . . . . . .
Kirsten A. Lynch. . . . . . . . . .
David T. Shapiro . . . . . . . . . .
2020 Target Annual
MIP Award as Percentage
of Base Salary
100%
75%
75%
75%
50%
Individual MIP Award Determination. Once funding is established, the actual MIP award paid to each NEO (other than
Mr. Katz) is determined by individual performance objectives. In the case of Mr. Katz, his award is based solely on the funded
amount of target MIP determined by Company performance because, unlike other NEOs, he is responsible for all aspects of
Company performance. This structure reflects our objective to put more emphasis on individual performance oriented
compensation, while at the same time requiring that overall Company performance standards are met before MIP funding can
occur. Achievement of individual performance objectives can result in the NEO receiving a MIP award equal to 0%, 70%, 100%,
115% or 130% of the funded amount (subject to availability of funds under the MIP) and subject to further adjustments at the
discretion of the Compensation Committee. Individual performance objectives vary depending upon our strategic plan and each
NEO’s individual responsibilities are established at the beginning of each fiscal year, with the expectation in fiscal 2020 that the
34
target level of performance of these objectives would require significant effort and substantial progress toward the goals of our
strategic plan in light of the current business environment. As a result, each NEO’s attainment of his or her performance objectives
in fiscal 2020 was moderately likely.
Example. An executive whose MIP award funding is 100% based on Resort EBITDA, earning $300,000 annually with a
target MIP award of 50% of base salary, would have an available MIP award funding of $150,000 for 100% achievement of Resort
EBITDA (100% times 50% salary target times 100% funding), for a total of $150,000 of target funding. However, because the
executive’s total MIP award is determined by the achievement of individual performance objectives, an executive’s ultimate total
MIP award can be paid out in an amount equal to 0%, 70%, 100%, 115% or 130% of the target amount based on individual
performance (subject to availability of funds under the MIP).
Fiscal 2020 Results. In fiscal 2020, primarily as a result of the early closure of our North American resorts on March 15,
2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we met 63.19% of the Resort EBITDA target, which resulted in a funding level of 0% of
the target funding level for that component of the funding calculation. Accordingly, none of the NEOs received a MIP award for
fiscal 2020.
Long-Term Equity Incentives
Our long-term equity incentive award program is designed to promote long-term Company performance and align each
executive’s risk with stockholder interest, to reward the achievement of long-term goals, and to promote stability and corporate
loyalty among our executives. The Compensation Committee bases awards of long-term equity compensation on a number of
different factors, including competitive market practices as determined by our peer group analysis, the information provided by
our independent compensation consultant, the amount of cash compensation that is currently paid to each NEO, each NEO’s level
of responsibility, our retention objectives and our pay-for-performance philosophy. In general, the Compensation Committee makes
long-term equity award determinations for executive officers in September of each year and typically consults with our CEO in
determining the size of grants to each NEO, other than himself, although the Compensation Committee makes all final
determinations. The non-management directors’ practice is to meet in executive session following the Board meeting in September
of each year to review and ratify the Compensation Committee’s annual review of the CEO. In fiscal 2020, the Compensation
Committee granted long-term equity incentive awards under the 2015 Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at the 2015
annual meeting.
As noted above, the long-term equity values awarded to our NEOs are based on a number of different factors considered by
the Compensation Committee. For fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded each NEO an equity value based on
individual achievements and performance. As described elsewhere in this CD&A, for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee
awarded Mr. Katz his long-term equity incentive awards as approximately 50% of the award value in RSUs and approximately
50% of the award value in Premium SARs, however, as discussed above, upon the recommendation of Mr. Katz, the value of his
long-term incentive award (RSUs and SARs) granted in September 2019 remained at the reduced amount of approximately $2
million.
As in previous years, the long-term equity incentive awards granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2020 consisted of RSUs and
SARs. In determining the mix of RSUs and SARs granted to each of our NEOs in fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee
considered that RSUs have a relatively greater retentive effect, but SARs have a relatively greater performance incentive impact.
Accordingly, for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded grants to the NEOs such that approximately 50% of the long-
term equity incentive award value granted is attributed to RSUs and approximately 50% of the award value granted is attributed
to SARs (and in the case of our CEO, Premium SARs). To further promote retention, the RSUs and SARs granted in fiscal 2020
vest in equal annual installments over a three year period commencing on the first anniversary date of the grant. As the awards
are inherently tied to the performance of our common stock, we consider a vesting schedule based upon continued service
appropriate to meet the desire for both retention and performance incentive.
The value of the equity awards granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2020 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table and
are further described in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.
35
Other Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
Clawback Policy
In line with corporate governance best practices, the Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy that allows
the Company to seek repayment of incentive compensation that was paid based on financial statements that were subsequently
restated. The policy provides that if the Board determines that there has been a material restatement of publicly issued financial
results from those previously issued to the public, our Board will review all MIP awards and equity awards made to executive
officers during the three-year period prior to the restatement on the basis of having met or exceeded specific performance targets.
If such payments would have been lower had they been calculated based on such restated results, our Board will (to the extent
permitted by governing law) seek to recoup the payments in excess of the amount that would have been paid based on the restated
results.
Equity Grant Practices
We generally seek to make equity compensation grants in the first quarter following the completion of a given fiscal year.
SARs are granted with an exercise price equal to or higher than the market price of our common stock on the date of grant, which
is the date the Compensation Committee approves the award. We do not have any specific program, plan or practice related to
timing equity compensation awards to executives; however, the Compensation Committee generally grants annual awards on the
date of the regularly scheduled first fiscal quarter Board meeting in September. Other than grants made in connection with hiring,
promotions or to replace certain new hire grants once they vest and/or are exercised, equity awards are granted to NEOs at the
same time that equity awards are granted to all other employees who are eligible for such awards.
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives
Consistent with our objective of encouraging executive stock ownership to create long-term stockholder value by aligning
the interests of our executives with our stockholders, the Company has adopted executive stock ownership guidelines. Under the
guidelines, our executive officers are expected to hold shares of our common stock equal to multiples of their base salaries as
follows:
Title
Chief Executive Officer . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chief Financial Officer . . . . . . . . . . . .
Presidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Vice Presidents . . . . . . . . . .
Multiple of Base
Salary
6x
3x
3x
2x
Until an executive achieves the required level of ownership, he or she is required to retain at least 75% of the net shares
received as a result of the vesting of RSUs or restricted stock or the exercise of SARs. Net shares are those that remain after shares
are netted to pay any applicable exercise price or statutory tax withholdings. Shares of common stock, stock owned in a directed
retirement plan or IRA and the intrinsic value of vested equity grants count as stock ownership for purposes of these guidelines.
As of the date of this proxy statement, all NEOs who are subject to our stock ownership guidelines have met their required level
of stock ownership.
Policy Prohibiting Hedging and Pledging Transactions
Our Insider Trading Compliance Program prohibits directors and senior level employees, including our executive officers,
from engaging in hedging transactions designed to offset decreases in the market value of the Company’s securities, including
engaging in short sales or investing in other derivatives of the Company’s securities, including put and call options and collar
transactions. The Insider Trading Compliance Program also prohibits directors and senior level employees, including our executive
officers, from pledging shares of the Company’s stock.
Post-Termination Compensation
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Katz is entitled to receive severance payments and continuation of certain
benefits upon certain terminations of employment, including certain resignations for “good reason” (as defined in his agreement).
Pursuant to the Company’s executive severance policy, Messrs. Barkin and Shapiro and Mmes. Campbell and Lynch are entitled
to receive severance payments upon certain terminations of employment. In addition, each NEO is entitled to receive payments
upon a termination occurring within a limited period of time following a change in control. We believe the change in control
arrangements provide continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change in control. We also believe that
our termination and severance provisions reflect both market practices and competitive factors. Our Board believed that these
36
severance payments and benefit arrangements were necessary to attract and retain our executives when these agreements were
entered into.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) was amended under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and with limited exceptions, the performance-based exemption
no longer applies. Compensation above $1,000,000 is generally non-deductible for any person who was (i) the chief executive
officer or chief financial officer at any time during the taxable year, (ii) one of the three highest compensated other executive
officers for the taxable year or (iii) a covered employee under Section 162(m) for any taxable year beginning on or after January
1, 2017. Our Company’s objectives are not always consistent with the requirements for full deductibility. Therefore, deductibility
is not the sole factor used in setting the appropriate compensation levels paid by the Company and decisions leading to future
compensation levels may not be fully deductible under Section 162(m). We believe this flexibility enables us to respond to changing
business conditions or to an executive’s exceptional individual performance.
37
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL 2020
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by the NEOs for each of the last three fiscal years
during which the officer was a NEO:
Name and Principal
Position
Fiscal
Year
Salary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)
Robert A. Katz . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
688,534 —
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer
2019
961,896 —
2018
929,367 —
Michael Z. Barkin. . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
522,500 —
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2019
540,385 —
2018
490,385 —
Patricia A. Campbell. . . . . . . . . .
2020
522,500 —
President - Mountain Division
2019
540,385 —
2018
490,385 —
Kirsten A. Lynch. . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
522,500 —
Executive Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer
2019
540,385 —
2018
490,385 —
David T. Shapiro. . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020
482,962 —
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary
2019
486,447 —
2018
426,732 —
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
1,034,942 (6)
1,315,920 (7)
1,209,885 (8)
750,159
774,808
616,486
750,159
774,808
549,857
750,159
774,808
549,857
517,471
549,812
349,967
Option/Share
Appreciation
Right Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
Total
($)
1,034,976
999,961
999,945
750,371
724,976
616,634
750,371
724,976
549,930
750,371
724,976
549,930
517,443
499,977
349,977
— (9)
316,115 (9)
210,009 (9)
—
269,363
168,375
—
269,363
168,375
—
269,363
168,375
—
163,250
96,428
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31,445 2,789,897
30,804 3,624,696
29,192 3,378,398
7,626 2,030,656
9,321 2,318,853
9,032 1,900,912
11,060 2,034,090
11,116 2,320,648
12,005 1,770,552
8,235 2,031,265
11,099 2,320,631
10,949 1,769,496
6,795 1,524,671
14,237 1,713,723
23,078 1,246,182
(1) Amounts shown reflect salary earned during the fiscal year, which differ from base salaries in that year based in part on the timing of previous year annual
adjustments, mid-year promotions, service period and other adjustments in any given year.
(2) Awards consist of RSUs. The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718, and do not represent cash payments made to individuals or amounts realized, or amounts that may be realized. Assumptions used
in the calculation of these amounts are included in note 17 to our audited financial statements for fiscal 2020, which are included in our Annual Report.
(3) Awards consist of SARs. The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of SARs granted during the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718, and do not represent cash payments made to individuals or amounts realized, or amounts that may be realized. Assumptions used
in the calculation of these amounts are included in note 17 to our audited financial statements for fiscal 2020, which are included in our Annual Report.
(4) As described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of this proxy statement, as the Resort EBITDA target set under the MIP was not met, no
MIP award was paid for any NEO during fiscal 2020.
(5) All other compensation for fiscal 2020 includes the following:
Name
Robert A. Katz
Michael Z. Barkin
Patricia A. Campbell
Kirsten A. Lynch
David T. Shapiro
Fiscal
Year
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
Company
Contributions
Under 401(k)
Savings Plan
($)(a)
Company-paid
Supplemental
Life Insurance
Premiums
($)(b)
Company-paid
Supplemental
Disability
Insurance
Premiums
($)(c)
Company-paid
Lodging, Ski School
Privileges and
Discretionary
Spending on Goods
and Services
($)(d)
8,550
5,255
5,255
5,255
1,493
7,295
900
900
900
900
1,824
1,471
4,905
2,080
4,402
13,776
—
—
—
—
Total
($)
31,445
7,626
11,060
8,235
6,795
(a) Consists of Company contributions to the NEO’s accounts in the Company’s tax-qualified 401(k) plan.
(b) Consists of premiums paid on behalf of the NEO for supplemental life insurance.
(c) Consists of premiums paid on behalf of the NEO for supplemental disability insurance.
(d)
In fiscal 2020, our NEOs were entitled to participate in our Perquisite Fund Program, under which certain of the Company’s officers receive an annual
allowance based on officer level to be used at the Company’s resorts. For fiscal 2020, annual allowances for NEOs were as follows: CEO—$70,000;
President—$40,000; and Executive Vice President—$30,000. Executives may draw against the account to pay for services or goods at the market rate.
Amounts of the fund used by the NEO are taxed as ordinary income, like other compensation. The amounts reported include the amounts used by the
38
NEO towards lodging, ski school privileges and discretionary spending on services or goods at our properties for personal use. In accordance with SEC
rules, the value of these benefits is measured on the basis of the estimated aggregate incremental cost to the Company for providing these benefits, and
perquisites and personal benefits are not reported for any NEO for whom such amounts were less than $10,000 in the aggregate for the fiscal year. In
fiscal 2020, the Company also provided to each NEO benefits relating to the use of one or more of our private clubs, for which the Company incurred
no incremental costs. NEOs are responsible for the payment of their individual, non-business related expenditures incurred at such clubs, although these
expenses would qualify for reimbursement under the Perquisite Fund Program if within the NEO’s allowance under that program.
(6) The amount shown in the “Stock Awards” column for fiscal 2020 includes $1,034,942 as part of his long-term equity incentive award, which represent the
aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs, based on 4,768 RSUs granted on September 25, 2019. Mr. Katz’s did not receive a MIP award for fiscal 2020.
(7) The amount shown in the “Stock Awards” column for fiscal 2019 includes $316,115 for 50% payment of Mr. Katz’s total MIP award and $999,805 as part
of his long-term equity incentive award, which represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs, based on the 1,456 and 3,706 RSUs granted on September
25, 2019 and September 27, 2018, respectively. Mr. Katz’s MIP award is paid 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three year period.
(8) The amount shown in the “Stock Awards” column for fiscal 2018 includes $210,009 for 50% payment of Mr. Katz’s total MIP award and $999,876 as part
of his long-term equity incentive award, which represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs, based on the 778 and 4,637 RSUs granted on September
27, 2018 and September 27, 2017, respectively. Mr. Katz’s MIP award is paid 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three year period.
(9) Mr. Katz’s MIP award is paid 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three year period. The amounts reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation” column for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018 reflect only the cash amount paid to Mr. Katz for 50% of Mr. Katz’s total MIP award for the
applicable fiscal year.
39
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2020
The following table shows certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to the NEOs during fiscal 2020:
Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
Target
($)(3)
Threshold
($)(2)
Maximum
($)(4)
2,004,158
Name
Grant
Date
Robert A. Katz . . . . . . .
— 1,002,079
Michael Z. Barkin. . . . .
Patricia A. Campbell. . .
Kirsten A. Lynch. . . . . .
David T. Shapiro. . . . . .
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
9/25/2019
—
426,938
1,110,039
—
426,938
1,110,039
—
426,938
1,110,039
—
258,750
672,750
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(#)
—
6,224 (7)
—
3,456 (7)
—
3,456 (7)
—
3,456 (7)
—
2,384 (7)
All Other
Option/SAR
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options/
SARs (#)(5)
—
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option/
SAR
Awards
($/Sh)
—
n/a
22,827
295.19
—
—
n/a
12,364
236.15
—
—
n/a
12,364
236.15
—
—
n/a
12,364
236.15
—
—
n/a
8,526
236.15
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards($)(6)
—
1,350,981
1,034,976
—
750,159
750,371
—
750,159
750,371
—
750,159
750,371
—
517,471
517,443
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
The estimated possible payouts are based on the parameters applicable to each NEO at the time the Compensation Committee established the relevant
performance goals in writing at the beginning of fiscal 2020, as more fully described in the CD&A section of this proxy statement. The actual earned and
subsequently paid amounts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.
The Threshold amount is based on the MIP’s minimum target funding level based upon no achievement of Resort EBITDA targets for fiscal 2020, with
the resulting funding applied to the NEO’s target percentage of base salary and then paid out at the 70% threshold level for individual performance (other
than for Mr. Katz, whose MIP award is tied entirely to corporate performance and payout is 50% cash and 50% RSUs that vest over three years).
The Target amount is based on the MIP’s target funding level of 100% upon achievement by the Company of 100% of certain Resort EBITDA targets for
fiscal 2020, with the resulting funding applied to the NEO’s target percentage of base salary and then paid out at the 100% target level for individual
performance (other than for Mr. Katz, whose MIP award is tied entirely to corporate performance and payout is 50% cash and 50% RSUs that vest over
three years).
The Maximum amount is based on the MIP’s maximum funding level of 200% upon achievement by the Company of at least 120% of certain Resort
EBITDA targets for fiscal 2020, with the resulting funding applied to the NEO’s target percentage of base salary and then paid out at the 130% maximum
level for individual performance (other than for Mr. Katz, whose MIP award is tied entirely to corporate performance and payout is 50% cash and 50%
RSUs that vest over three years).
Represents SARs that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The exercise price of each SAR is equal
to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, except in the case of the SARs award value granted to Mr. Katz for which the exercise price
was 125% of the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Upon the exercise of a SAR, the actual number of shares the Company will issue
to the NEO is equal the quotient of (i) the product of (x) the excess of the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the
exercise price, multiplied by (y) the number of SARs exercised, divided by (ii) the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise,
less any shares withheld to cover payment of applicable tax withholding obligations. The grants were made pursuant to the 2015 Plan.
The amounts shown represent the aggregate fair value of the award calculated as of the grant date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions
used in the calculation of these amounts are included in note 17 to our audited financial statements for fiscal 2020, which are included in our Annual Report.
Represents RSUs that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The grants were made pursuant to the
2015 Plan. In the case of Mr. Katz, the number of shares includes 1,456 RSUs for 50% payment of Mr. Katz’s total MIP award for fiscal 2019 and 4,768
RSUs as part of his long-term equity incentive award for fiscal 2020.
40
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Katz, which was approved by the Compensation Committee. No
other NEO has an employment agreement with the Company.
Robert A. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Katz on October 15, 2008, as amended on September 30,
2011 and April 11, 2013. The employment agreement had an initial term through October 15, 2011 and provides for automatic
renewal for successive one year periods if neither party provides written notice of non-renewal to the other party not less than
60 days prior to the then-current scheduled expiration date. Under the employment agreement, the initial base salary was set at
$843,500, subject to annual adjustments by the Compensation Committee, though in no case may the base salary be reduced at
any time below the then-current level. As part of the Company-wide wage reduction plan effective April 2, 2009, Mr. Katz waived
this requirement and did not take any salary for a twelve month period. Effective April 1, 2010, Mr. Katz’s salary was reinstated
at 85% of his prior pre-wage reduction salary. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Katz also participates in the Company’s
MIP, as more fully described in the CD&A. Under the employment agreement, if the Company achieves specified performance
targets for the year under the MIP, Mr. Katz’s “target opportunity” will be no less than 100% of his base salary. The employment
agreement provides that Mr. Katz’s MIP award is to be paid 50% in cash and 50% in RSUs that vest annually over a three year
period. Mr. Katz also receives other benefits and perquisites on the same terms as afforded to senior executives generally, including
customary health, disability and insurance benefits, certain membership benefits at the Company’s private clubs and participation
in the Perquisite Fund Program.
The employment agreement also provides for certain payments in connection with the termination (including constructive
termination) of Mr. Katz under certain circumstances, as more fully described under the heading “Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control” below. The September 2011 amendment to his employment agreement eliminated his rights
to (i) receive cash severance benefits upon his voluntary resignation within six months following a change in control, and (ii) be
eligible to receive tax gross-up payments on severance and other benefits payable in connection with a change in control. The
April 2013 amendment eliminated his rights to paid time off in connection with the Company’s adoption of a flexible time off
policy.
Mr. Katz’s employment agreement contains standard provisions for non-competition and non-solicitation of the Company’s
managerial employees that become effective as of the date of Mr. Katz’s termination of employment and that continue for two
years thereafter. Mr. Katz is also subject to a permanent covenant to maintain confidentiality of the Company’s confidential
information.
41
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2020 YEAR-END
The following table shows certain information regarding outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs as of July 31, 2020:
Stock Awards
Option /
SAR
Expiration
Date
Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)(4)(5)
Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested ($)(6)
Name
Robert A. Katz. . . . . . . .
Michael Z. Barkin . . . . .
Patricia A. Campbell . . .
Kirsten A. Lynch . . . . . .
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options / SARs
Exercisable (#)(1)
100,583 (SARs)
100,583 (SARs)
81,340 (SARs)
81,340 (SARs)
21,611 (SARs)
49,063 (SARs)
18,527 (SARs)
42,385 (SARs)
45,528 (SARs)
9,876 (SARs)
3,909 (SARs)
2,860 (SARs)
13,169 (SARs)
8,698 (SARs)
5,121 (SARs)
2,379 (SARs)
1,755 (SARs)
10,843 (SARs)
11,002 (SARs)
9,271 (SARs)
12,723 (SARs)
7,458 (SARs)
4,567 (SARs)
2,379 (SARs)
2,800 (SARs)
14,166 (SARs)
15,360 (SARs)
13,169 (SARs)
7,458 (SARs)
4,567 (SARs)
2,379 (SARs)
Option Awards
Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options / SARs
Unexercisable (#)(1)(2)
4,938 (SARs)
7,818 (SARs)
22,827 (SARs)
2,561 (SARs)
4,758 (SARs)
12,364 (SARs)
2,284 (SARs)
4,758 (SARs)
12,364 (SARs)
2,284 (SARs)
4,758 (SARs)
12,364 (SARs)
Option /
SAR
Exercise
Price ($)(3)
54.07
67.59
68.98
86.23
87.18
108.98
107.42
134.28
200.70
285.05
357.66
295.19
87.18
107.42
160.56
228.04
286.13
236.15
41.43
54.07
68.98
87.18
107.42
160.56
228.04
286.13
236.15
46.75
68.98
87.18
107.42
160.56
228.04
286.13
236.15
9/21/2022
9/21/2022
9/26/2023
9/26/2023
9/23/2024
9/23/2024
9/25/2025
9/25/2025
9/23/2026
9/27/2027
9/27/2028
9/25/2029
9/23/2024
9/25/2025
9/23/2026
9/27/2027
9/27/2028
9/25/2029
4/15/2022
9/21/2022
9/26/2023
9/23/2024
9/25/2025
9/23/2026
9/27/2027
9/27/2028
9/25/2029
7/5/2021
9/26/2023
9/23/2024
9/25/2025
9/23/2026
9/27/2027
9/27/2028
9/25/2029
David T. Shapiro . . . . . .
8,440 (SARs)
2,907 (SARs)
1,641 (SARs)
1,453 (SARs)
3,281 (SARs)
8,526 (SARs)
107.42
228.04
286.13
236.15
9/25/2025
9/27/2027
9/27/2028
9/25/2029
2,201
2,988
6,224
953
1,914
3,456
422,658
573,786
1,195,195
183,005
367,545
663,656
850
1,914
3,456
163,226
367,545
663,656
850
1,914
3,456
541
1,358
2,384
163,226
367,545
663,656
103,888
260,777
457,800
(1) Represents exercisable or unexercisable SARs that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Upon the
exercise of a SAR, the actual number of shares the Company will issue to the NEO is equal to the quotient of (i) the product of (x) the excess of the per share
fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price, multiplied by (y) the number of SARs exercised, divided by (ii) the
per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise, less any shares withheld to cover payment of applicable tax withholding obligations.
(2) The grant dates and vesting dates of each unexercisable SAR award as of July 31, 2020 are as follows:
42
Name
Number of
Unexercisable
SARs
Grant Date
Robert A. Katz. . . . . . . .
4,938
September 27, 2017
7,818
September 27, 2018
22,827
September 25, 2019
Michael Z. Barkin . . . . .
2,561
September 27, 2017
4,758
September 27, 2018
12,364
September 25, 2019
Patricia A. Campbell . . .
2,284
September 27, 2017
4,758
September 27, 2018
12,364
September 25, 2019
Kirsten A. Lynch . . . . . .
2,284
September 27, 2017
4,758
September 27, 2018
12,364
September 25, 2019
David T. Shapiro . . . . . .
1,453
September 27, 2017
3,281
September 27, 2018
8,526
September 25, 2019
Vesting Schedule of
Original Total Grant
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Vesting Date
(date award is
vested in full)
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
(3) The exercise price of each SAR is equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, except for the Premium SARs granted to Mr. Katz
with exercise prices of $67.59, $86.23, $108.98, $134.28, $200.70, $285.05, $357.66 and $295.19 which are equal to 125% of the closing price of our
common stock on the date of grant.
(4) Represents unvested RSUs that, unless otherwise specifically noted in footnote 5 below, vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of grant.
(5) The grant dates and vesting dates of RSUs that have not vested as of July 31, 2020 are as follows:
43
Name
Number of
Unvested RSUs
Grant Date
Robert A. Katz . . . . . . .
2,201
September 27, 2017
Vesting Schedule of
Original Total Grant
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Vesting Date
(date award is
vested in full)
September 27, 2020
2,988
September 27, 2018
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2021
6,224
September 25, 2019
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 25, 2022
Michael Z. Barkin. . . . .
953
September 27, 2017
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2020
1,914
September 27, 2018
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2021
3,456
September 25, 2019
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 25, 2022
Patricia A. Campbell. . .
850
September 27, 2017
1,914
September 27, 2018
3,456
September 25, 2019
Kirsten A. Lynch. . . . . .
850
September 27, 2017
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2020
September 27, 2021
September 25, 2022
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2020
1,914
September 27, 2018
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2021
David T. Shapiro. . . . . .
541
September 27, 2017
3,456
September 25, 2019
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 25, 2022
September 27, 2020
1,358
September 27, 2018
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 27, 2021
2,384
September 25, 2019
Equal annual installments over a three-year period beginning
on anniversary of the date of grant.
September 25, 2022
(6) The fair market value of these unvested RSU awards was determined based on the closing price of our common stock of $192.03 per share on July 31,
2020, multiplied by the number of units.
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2020
The following table shows for fiscal 2020 certain information regarding SAR exercises and stock vested during the last
fiscal year with respect to the NEOs:
Name
Robert A. Katz
Michael Z. Barkin
Patricia A. Campbell
Kirsten A. Lynch
David T. Shapiro
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares Acquired on
Exercise(#)(1)
Value
Realized on
Exercise($)(2)
Number of
Shares Acquired on
Vesting(#)(1)
Value
Realized on
Vesting($)(4)
142,384
8,000
—
13,599
8,166
20,671,309 (3)
1,149,280
—
2,405,935
791,844
9,557
2,925
2,677
2,677
1,819
2,279,353
695,681
636,551
636,551
432,550
(1) Represents the aggregate number of shares acquired on vesting or exercise, as applicable. The amounts shown do not reflect amounts withheld by the
Company to satisfy tax withholding requirements or to satisfy the exercise price.
(2) The aggregate dollar value realized upon the exercise of options/SARs was computed by multiplying the difference between the closing price of the Company’s
common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price for the award by the number of awards exercised.
(3) As stated in the Company’s press release dated June 8, 2020, Mr. Katz exercised various SAR awards that were approaching their expiration date and donated
both shares and proceeds received from the sale of shares to his family's charitable trust and foundation, which amount represented the full after-tax proceeds
Mr. Katz received from such exercises.
(4) The aggregate dollar value realized on the vesting of RSUs was computed by multiplying the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting
date by the number of shares vested.
PENSION BENEFITS
The Company does not provide pension benefits or a defined contribution plan to the NEOs other than the Company’s tax-
qualified 401(k) plan.
44
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2020
The following table shows for fiscal 2020 certain information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation benefits for
the NEOs:
Name
Robert A. Katz
Michael Z. Barkin
Patricia A. Campbell
Kirsten A. Lynch
David T. Shapiro
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY($)(1)
—
—
—
—
—
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY($)
—
—
—
—
—
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY($)(2)
—
—
1,195
—
—
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions($)
—
—
—
—
—
Aggregate
Balance
at Last FYE($)(3)
—
—
7,862
—
—
(1) Represents amount deferred during fiscal 2020, if any, which is reported as compensation to the NEO in the Summary Compensation Table. Although no
amounts were deferred during fiscal 2020 for any NEO, Ms. Campbell made contributions prior to fiscal 2020.
(2) None of the amounts set forth are reported in the Summary Compensation Table because above-market or preferential earnings are not available under the
plan.
(3) This amount reflects actual amounts reported and does not include accumulated earnings or withdrawals or distributions.
On September 15, 2000, Vail Associates, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, which we refer to in
this section of the proxy statement as the Employer, adopted a Deferred Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the Grandfathered
Plan, for the benefit of a select group of management or highly compensated employees, or participants. The Grandfathered Plan
is not tax qualified. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, sets
forth specific tax requirements related to nonqualified deferred compensation plans, including the Grandfathered Plan. Rules under
Section 409A were effective for nonqualified deferrals of compensation after December 31, 2004. As a result, after December 31,
2004, no new contributions were accepted into the Grandfathered Plan.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Employer began operating a new nonqualified deferred compensation plan designed to comply
with Section 409A, which we refer to as the Plan. The Plan provides for two classes of participants. Class 1 participants may
contribute to the Plan up to 95% of their base pay and up to 95% of any Employer-paid bonus. Class 2 participants may defer only
an amount of base pay equal to any 401(k) compliance test refund. Effective January 1, 2007, all participants became eligible to
defer up to 80% of their base salary (including an amount of base pay equal to any 401(k) compliance test refund) and 100% of
any Employer-paid bonus. Members of the Board may contribute up to 100% of their director fees. All contributions made by
participants are 100% vested. The Employer may, on an annual basis, elect to make matching and/or discretionary employer
contributions, although to date, the Employer has not made any such contributions. Matching and discretionary contributions vest
as determined by the Employer or the Plan’s administrative committee, which we refer to in this section of the proxy statement
as the Plan Committee. The Employer or the Plan Committee may accelerate the vesting on matching and/or discretionary Employer
contributions at any time, and accelerated vesting will generally occur automatically upon a change in control as defined in
Section 409A.
Under the Plan, all contributions for a Plan year are allocated among the following two types of accounts at the election of
the Participant: Separation from Service accounts and Scheduled Distribution accounts. Separation from Service accounts are
generally payable in a lump sum or installments six months following the termination of a Participant’s employment. Scheduled
Distribution accounts are generally payable as a lump sum at a designated date at least three years from the year of deferral.
Participants have limited rights to delay distributions from either type of account, provided that the election to delay a distribution
(i) is made at least twelve months prior to the date the distribution would otherwise have been made, and (ii) delays the distribution
for at least five years. All accounts are payable immediately upon the Participant’s disability or death. Participants generally have
the right to receive an early distribution from their accounts only upon an unforeseeable emergency. Participants have the right to
designate hypothetical investments for their accounts, and their accounts are credited with gains or losses in accordance with the
Participants’ selections.
All contributions are placed in a rabbi trust which restricts the Employer’s use of and access to the contributions. However,
all money in the rabbi trust remains subject to the Employer’s general creditors in the event of bankruptcy. The trustee, Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., is entitled to invest the trust fund in accordance with guidelines established by the Employer. Currently, all
assets are invested in a Trust-Owned Life Insurance policy. To the extent that the funds in the trust are insufficient to pay Plan
benefits, the Employer is required to fund the difference.
The Plan Committee is charged with responsibility to select certain mutual funds, insurance company separate accounts,
indexed rates or other methods, which we refer to as Measurement Funds, for purposes of crediting or debiting additional amounts
45
to Participants’ account balances. Participants may elect one or more of these Measurement Funds for purposes of crediting or
debiting additional amounts to his or her account balance. As necessary, the Plan Committee may discontinue, substitute or add
a Measurement Fund. Each such action will take effect as of the first day of the first calendar quarter that begins at least thirty
days after the day on which the Plan Committee gives Participants advance written notice of such change. Participants can change
their Measurement Fund allocations daily. The Measurement Funds are valued daily at their net asset values.
Using the weighted average return methodology, the rate of return for the Plan, as a weighted portfolio, for the prior twelve-
month period ended July 31, 2020 was 6.35%. The rate of return of the S&P 500 for that same period was 11.96%. For this purpose,
the weighted portfolio is a weighted average percentage allocation based on the Plan sponsor’s liability holdings for a given point
in time, and the weighted average returns are calculated based on the weights assigned using the returns of the underlying funds.
Actual account cash balances were not used in calculating this performance. The Plan does not provide for the payment of interest
based on above-market rates.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
The employment agreement with Mr. Katz and the Company’s executive severance policy, which applies to Messrs. Barkin
and Shapiro and Mmes. Campbell and Lynch, require us to provide certain compensation in the event of certain terminations of
employment or upon a change in control of the Company. The employment agreement with Mr. Katz and the executive severance
policy provide that the Company may terminate the executive at any time with or without cause. However, if the executive’s
employment is terminated without cause or terminated by the executive for good reason, then the executive shall be entitled, in
exchange for a signed release, to receive compensation in the amounts and under the circumstances described below. In addition,
the forms of equity award agreements used with all of our employees provide for the full acceleration of vesting of outstanding
SARs, restricted stock and RSUs upon a change in control of the Company. In accordance with the employment agreement with
Mr. Katz, if he breaches the post-employment non-competition or non-solicitation covenants to which he is subject under his
employment agreement, then he must promptly reimburse the Company for any severance payments received from, or payable
by, the Company.
The amounts shown in the tables below are estimates of the value of the payments and benefits each of our NEOs would
have been entitled to receive had a termination event and/or a change in control of the Company occurred, effective as of July 31,
2020. The actual compensation to be paid to a NEO can only be determined at the time such NEO’s employment is terminated
and may vary based on factors such as the timing during the year of any such event, the Company’s stock price and any changes
to our benefit arrangements and policies.
Robert A. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Katz’s employment agreement provides that upon (i) the giving of notice of non-renewal of the agreement by the
Company or termination of employment by the Company without cause or (ii) termination of employment by Mr. Katz for good
reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Katz is entitled to receive certain benefits (so long as he has executed a
release in connection with his termination), including: (a) two years of then-current base salary payable in a lump sum; (b) a
prorated MIP award (provided that performance targets are met) for the portion of the Company’s fiscal year through the effective
date of the termination or non-renewal, payable in lump sum; (c) one year of COBRA premiums for continuation of health and
dental coverage, payable in a lump sum; and (d) full accelerated vesting of any RSUs, SARs or other equity awards held by
Mr. Katz. If, within twelve months of the consummation of a change in control of the Company, (i) the Company terminates
Mr. Katz without cause or gives notice of non-renewal of his agreement or (ii) Mr. Katz terminates his employment for good
reason, Mr. Katz is entitled to receive (so long as he has executed a release in connection with his termination): (a) two years of
then-current base salary payable in a lump sum; (b) a prorated MIP award (provided that performance targets are met) for the
portion of the Company’s fiscal year through the effective date of the termination or non-renewal, payable in lump sum; (c) an
amount equal to the cash MIP award paid to Mr. Katz in the prior year, payable in lump sum; and (d) to the extent not already
vested, full accelerated vesting of any RSUs, SARs or other equity awards held by Mr. Katz.
The following table describes the estimated potential compensation to Mr. Katz upon termination or a change in control of
the Company:
Executive Benefits and Payments(1)
Base Salary
SAR/RSU Acceleration
MIP Award
Health Insurance
Total
Termination without Cause or
Resignation for Good Reason
2,004,158
2,191,574
1,002,079
28,432
5,226,243
$
Change in Control
—
2,191,574
—
—
2,191,574
$
Termination following
Change in Control(2)
2,004,158
—
1,318,194
—
3,322,352
$
46
(1) Assumes the following: (a) base salary equal to $1,002,079 is in effect as of the assumed termination or change in control date of July 31, 2020; (b) executive’s
unvested RSUs and SARs at July 31, 2020 would be subject to accelerated vesting on that date (when the closing price per share of our common stock was
$192.03); and (c) all Company targets under the MIP are met and executive’s pro rata MIP award payable as of the termination date is the target amount
indicated under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table above.
(2) Benefits triggered upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason would apply in the same manner following a change in control when the
new owners are bound by the terms of the employment agreement, except that equity awards would have already accelerated in full upon the change in
control event.
Michael Z. Barkin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the Company’s executive severance policy, Mr. Barkin is entitled to receive severance payments upon certain
terminations of employment. In addition, Mr. Barkin is entitled to receive payments upon a termination occurring within a certain
period of time following a change in control.
The following table describes the estimated potential compensation to Mr. Barkin upon termination or a change in control
of the Company:
Executive Benefits and Payments(1)
Base Salary
SAR/RSU Acceleration
MIP Award
Health Insurance
Total
Termination without Cause or
Resignation for Good Reason
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
Change in Control
—
$
1,214,206
—
—
1,214,206
$
Termination following
Change in Control(2)
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
(1) Assumes the following: (a) base salary equal to $569,250 is in effect as of the assumed termination or change in control date of July 31, 2020; (b) executive’s
unvested SARs and RSUs at July 31, 2020 would be subject to accelerated vesting on that date (when the closing price per share of our common stock was
$192.03); and (c) MIP award payable under the executive severance policy upon a termination following a change in control is equal to the most recent MIP
award paid to the executive.
(2) Benefits triggered upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason would apply in the same manner following a change in control pursuant
to the Company’s executive severance policy when the new owners are bound by the terms of the executive severance policy, except that equity awards
would have already accelerated in full upon the change in control event.
Patricia A. Campbell, President - Mountain Division
Pursuant to the Company’s executive severance policy, Ms. Campbell is entitled to receive severance payments upon certain
terminations of employment. In addition, Ms. Campbell is entitled to receive payments upon a termination occurring within a
certain period of time following a change in control.
The following table describes the estimated potential compensation to Ms. Campbell upon termination or a change in control
of the Company:
Executive Benefits and Payments(1)
Base Salary
SAR/RSU Acceleration
MIP Award
Health Insurance
Total
Termination without Cause or
Resignation for Good Reason
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
Change in Control
—
$
1,194,427
—
—
1,194,427
$
Termination following
Change in Control(2)
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
(1) Assumes the following: (a) base salary equal to $569,250 is in effect as of the assumed termination or change in control date of July 31, 2020; (b) executive’s
unvested SARs and RSUs at July 31, 2020 would be subject to accelerated vesting on that date (when the closing price per share of our common stock was
$192.03); and (c) MIP award payable under the executive severance policy upon a termination following a change in control is equal to the most recent MIP
award paid to the executive.
(2) Benefits triggered upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason would apply in the same manner following a change in control pursuant
to the Company’s executive severance policy when the new owners are bound by the terms of the executive severance policy, except that equity awards
would have already accelerated in full upon the change in control event.
Kirsten A. Lynch, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
Pursuant to the Company’s executive severance policy, Ms. Lynch is entitled to receive severance payments upon certain
terminations of employment. In addition, Ms. Lynch is entitled to receive payments upon a termination occurring within a certain
period of time following a change in control.
47
The following table describes the estimated potential compensation to Ms. Lynch upon termination or a change in control of the
Company:
Executive Benefits and Payments(1)
Base Salary
SAR/RSU Acceleration
MIP Award
Health Insurance
Total
Termination without Cause or
Resignation for Good Reason
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
Change in Control
—
$
1,194,427
—
—
1,194,427
$
Termination following
Change in Control(2)
569,250
$
—
—
—
569,250
$
(1) Assumes the following: (a) base salary equal to $569,250 is in effect as of the assumed termination or change in control date of July 31, 2020; (b) executive’s
unvested SARs and RSUs at July 31, 2020 would be subject to accelerated vesting on that date (when the closing price per share of our common stock was
$192.03); and (c) MIP award payable under the executive severance policy upon a termination following a change in control is equal to the most recent MIP
award paid to the executive.
(2) Benefits triggered upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason would apply in the same manner following a change in control pursuant
to the Company’s executive severance policy when the new owners are bound by the terms of the executive severance policy, except that equity awards
would have already accelerated in full upon the change in control event.
David T. Shapiro, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Pursuant to the Company’s executive severance policy, Mr. Shapiro is entitled to receive severance payments upon certain
terminations of employment. In addition, Mr. Shapiro is entitled to receive payments upon a termination occurring within a certain
period of time following a change in control.
The following table describes the estimated potential compensation to Mr. Shapiro upon termination or a change in control
of the Company:
Executive Benefits and Payments(1)
Base Salary
SAR/RSU Acceleration
MIP Award
Health Insurance
Total
Termination without Cause or
Resignation for Good Reason
517,500
$
—
—
—
517,500
$
Change in Control
—
$
822,464
—
—
822,464
$
Termination following
Change in Control(2)
517,500
$
—
—
—
517,500
$
(1) Assumes the following: (a) base salary equal to $517,500 is in effect as of the assumed termination or change in control date of July 31, 2020; (b) executive’s
unvested SARs and RSUs at July 31, 2020 would be subject to accelerated vesting on that date (when the closing price per share of our common stock was
$192.03); and (c) MIP award payable under the executive severance policy upon a termination following a change in control is equal to the most recent MIP
award paid to the executive.
(2) Benefits triggered upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason would apply in the same manner following a change in control pursuant
to the Company’s executive severance policy when the new owners are bound by the terms of the executive severance policy, except that equity awards
would have already accelerated in full upon the change in control event.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table summarizes the Company’s equity compensation plans as of July 31, 2020:
Plan Category
(a)
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights(1)(2)
(in thousands)
(b)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(c)
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in
column (a)) (in thousands)
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
Total
1,191
—
1,191
$
$
138.59
—
138.59
3,224
—
3,224
(1)
Includes 130,000 RSUs that are not included in the calculation of the Weighted-Average Exercise Price in column (b).
(2)
Includes the gross number of shares underlying outstanding SARs. Upon the exercise of a SAR, the actual number of shares we will issue to the participant
is equal the quotient of (i) the product of (x) the excess of the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise
price, multiplied by (y) the number of SARs exercised, divided by (ii) the per share fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise, less any
shares withheld to cover payment of applicable tax withholding obligations.
48
PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of
Regulation S-K (we refer to the statute and the regulation collectively as the “pay ratio rule”), we are providing the ratio of the
annual total compensation of Mr. Katz, our Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of our median employee.
The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the pay ratio rule.
To calculate the pay ratio, we determined our median employee as of July 31, 2020, which is the last day of our fiscal
2020. On July 31, 2020, we had 11,303 employees, 6,993 of which were year-round employees and 4,310 of which were seasonal
employees.
To identify the “median employee” for the purposes of this disclosure, we analyzed, for all of the individuals employed
by us as of July 31, 2020, or as of June 30, 2020 in the case of Australian employees, the compensation that we paid to each of
those individuals for the 12-month period ending on that date. We considered each employee’s “compensation” to consist of (i)
the employee’s total gross earnings for a 12-month period ending on July 31, 2020 or June 30, 2020 (in the case of Australia), plus
(ii) the estimated amount of the Company’s contributions for that period to the retirement plans in which the employee participates
based upon the employee’s deferral elections on the date identified. For our Canadian employees, the rate of pay was converted
to U.S. Dollars using a conversion rate US$1.0000 to CAD$0.7531. For our Australian employees, the rate of pay was converted
to U.S. Dollars using a conversion rate of US$1.0000 to AUS$0.7233. No cost-of-living adjustments were made.
Total Annual Compensation of our CEO in fiscal 2020 was $2,789,897 and was based on the compensation reportable
in the Summary Compensation Table according to applicable instructions and interpretations. When compared to the total annual
compensation for our median employee of $35,777, this results in a pay ratio of 78:1.
The nature of our operations requires the use of many seasonal and part-time employees who do not work year round,
and accordingly, we are providing a supplemental disclosure annualizing the compensation of such employees. To identify the
“median employee” for purposes of this supplemental disclosure, we analyzed, for all of the individuals employed by use as of
July 31, 2020, or as of June 30, 2020 in the case of Australian employees, the compensation that we paid to each of those individuals
for the 12-month period ending on that date. We considered each employee’s “compensation” to consist of (i) the employee’s
total gross earnings for the 12-month period ending July 31, 2020 or June 30, 2020 (in the case of Australia), plus (ii) the estimated
amount of the Company’s contributions for that period to the retirement plans in which the employee participates. The compensation
for seasonal or part-time employees who were not employed by us for the entire 12-month period was annualized to reflect
compensation for a comparable period (or 2,080 hours worked during the year). The same Canadian and Australian dollar currency
conversion rates as stated above were used for this supplemental disclosure. No cost-of-living adjustments were made.
Using the total annual compensation of our CEO in fiscal 2020 of $2,789,897 as presented in the Summary Compensation
Table, when compared to the total annualized compensation for our median employee as of July 31, 2020 of $42,412, the results
in a pay ratio of 66:1.
49
PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected, and the Board has ratified the selection of, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2021, and has further directed that management submit the selection of
independent auditors for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has been the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP expects to have a
representative at the annual meeting who will have the opportunity to make a statement and who will be available to answer
appropriate questions.
Neither the Company’s Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee
is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate
practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. It is understood that even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may
direct the appointment of a new independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that
such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
FEES BILLED TO VAIL RESORTS BY PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP DURING FISCAL 2020 AND FISCAL
2019
Audit Fees. Audit fees (including expenses) billed (or billable) to the Company by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the
audit of our annual financial statements included in our Form 10-K and the review of the financial statements included in our
Forms 10-Q with respect to fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019 were $2,896,000 and $2,910,500, respectively. For both fiscal years, such
fees included fees for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s examination of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Audit-Related Fees. There were no audit related fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect to fiscal 2020
and fiscal 2019.
Tax Fees. Tax fees billed or billable by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect to fiscal 2020 were $178,400. In fiscal
2019, there were $12,000 of tax fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Such fees for fiscal 2020 were related to tax services
provided to the Company in connection with international tax compliance.
All Other Fees. All other fees (including expenses) billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect to fiscal 2020
and fiscal 2019 were $5,100 and $4,500, respectively. Such fees were related to software licensing fees for technical research
tools.
The Audit Committee determined that the provision of services other than audit services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
was compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.
The Audit Committee has the sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms and pre-approve all audit and
permissible non-audit services provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee
has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to pre-approve services between Audit Committee meetings, which
must be reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. Fees for permissible non-audit services that are not pre-approved
must be less than 5% of total fees paid. For fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, all of the fees included under the headings “Tax Fees”
and “All Other Fees” above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JULY 31, 2021.
50
PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking stockholders to approve an advisory resolution, commonly
referred to as a “say-on-pay” resolution, approving our executive compensation as reported in this proxy statement. As described
in the CD&A section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation program is designed to incentivize achievement of
short- and long-term Company and individual performance. We believe this compensation approach aligns the interests of our
executive officers with those of our stockholders.
•
•
•
The Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to achieve the following key objectives:
Emphasizing Pay-for-Performance. Emphasize pay-for-performance by tying annual and long-term compensation
incentives to achievement of specified performance objectives or overall stock performance.
Attracting, Retaining and Motivating. Attract, retain and motivate talented executives who will determine our long-term
success through a program competitive with compensation paid by companies in the same market for executive talent.
Rewarding Contributions and Creating Long-Term Value. Recognize and reward contributions of all employees,
including executive officers, in achieving strategic goals and business objectives, while aligning the program with
stockholder interests.
We encourage stockholders to read the CD&A (as well as the other tables and narrative disclosures included in this proxy
statement), which describes in more detail how our executive compensation program operates and is designed to achieve our
compensation objectives, including through the use of annual incentive awards, long-term equity awards, a high percentage of
compensation that is variable or “at-risk” and performance-based stock awards for our CEO. The Compensation Committee and
the Board believe that the policies and procedures articulated in the CD&A are effective in achieving our goals and that the
compensation of our named executive officers reported in this proxy statement has supported and contributed to the Company’s
recent and long-term success and is aligned with the interests of our stockholders.
At the 2019 annual meeting, we submitted a “say-on-pay” resolution to our stockholders. Our stockholders approved this
proposal with approximately 86% of the votes cast on the proposal voting in favor of the resolution. Because our Board views the
annual advisory vote as a good corporate governance practice, and because at our 2017 annual meeting approximately 93% of the
votes cast on the frequency proposal were in favor of an annual advisory vote, we are again asking stockholders to approve the
compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement. The Board currently believes that holding an annual say-on-pay
vote is the most appropriate policy for the Company, consistent with the overwhelming preference indicated by our stockholders
at the 2017 annual meeting. Therefore we expect that the next say on pay vote will occur at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.
Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends that stockholders approve the following advisory resolution at the annual
meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers of Vail Resorts, Inc., as disclosed pursuant to the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the CD&A, compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is
hereby APPROVED.”
Although this vote is advisory and is not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee will take into account the
outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
51
THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
How can stockholders attend the annual meeting?
Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders,
employees and directors, this year’s annual meeting will be held entirely online. Only such stockholders as of the close of business
on October 7, 2020, their proxy holders, and our invited guests may attend the Annual Meeting. To participate in the virtual annual
meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020 and log in using the 16-digit control number printed in the box
marked by the arrow on your proxy card. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or
course of the annual meeting, please call (855) 449-0991.
What is the agenda for the annual meeting?
The annual meeting will include a discussion of and voting on matters described in the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and Proxy Statement and a brief question and answer session. The question and answer session will be limited only
to questions relating to the proposals set forth in the Notice and Proxy Statement. We will not be providing a business update or
answering any business or company performance related questions at the annual meeting as we will be releasing our results for
the first quarter of fiscal 2021 the following week and holding an investor call to discuss the results at such time. If you wish to
submit a question relating to the proposals set forth in the Notice and Proxy Statement, immediately before or during the meeting,
log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020, type your question into the “Ask a
Question” field, and click “Submit.”
What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a “street name” holder?
If your shares of the Company’s common stock are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, EQ
Shareowner Services, then you are a stockholder of record.
If your shares are not held in your name, but rather are held through an intermediary, such as in an account at a brokerage
firm or by a bank, trustee or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” However, as a
beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other nominee regarding how to vote the shares held in your account.
Who is entitled to vote at or attend the annual meeting?
Holders of record and street name holders (subject to the requirements below) of our common stock and the Exchangeable
Shares (as defined below) as of the close of business on October 7, 2020, which we refer to as the record date, are entitled to vote.
On the record date, we had 40,249,124 shares of common stock outstanding and 35,607 Exchangeable Shares outstanding. Each
share, including each Exchangeable Share, is entitled to one vote on each item being voted on at the annual meeting. You are
entitled to attend the annual meeting only if you were a stockholder, joint holder or holder of Exchangeable Shares as of the record
date or you hold a valid proxy for the annual meeting.
If you are a stockholder of record:
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote at the virtual meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend
the annual meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy in advance of the annual meeting over the telephone or on the Internet as
instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to ensure your vote is counted.
If you are a street name holder:
If you are a street name holder, you may not vote your shares at the virtual annual meeting unless you request and obtain a
valid proxy from your broker or other nominee and follow the instructions on how to attend the virtual meeting. If you want to
attend the virtual annual meeting, but not vote at the meeting, you must also follow the instructions of your broker or other nominee
on how to attend the virtual meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy or
otherwise instruct your nominee how to vote on your behalf in advance of the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions
provided by your bank, broker, trustee or other nominee.
52
How do I vote my shares?
If you are a stockholder of record of our common shares:
By Telephone or the Internet
Stockholders of record can vote their shares via telephone or the Internet as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability
of Proxy Materials. The telephone and Internet procedures are designed to authenticate a stockholder’s identity, to allow
stockholders to vote their shares and confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
The telephone and Internet voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 2, 2020.
By Mail
Stockholders who elect to vote by mail should request a paper proxy card by telephone or Internet and should complete,
sign and date their proxy cards and mail them in the pre-addressed envelopes that accompany the delivery of paper proxy cards.
Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the meeting in order for your shares to be voted.
By Participating in the Virtual Annual Meeting
Stockholders of
the virtual annual meeting may visit
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020, log in using the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow
on your proxy card, click on the vote button on the screen and follow the instructions provided.
to vote electronically at
record who wish
If you are a street name holder of our common shares:
By Telephone or the Internet
If your broker or other nominee provides for a means to submit your voting instructions by telephone or the Internet, you
will be provided with directions on doing so by your broker or other nominee.
By Mail
Street name holders may vote by mail by requesting a paper voting instruction card according to the instructions contained
in the materials received from your broker or other nominee.
By Participating in the Virtual Annual Meeting
Street name holders who wish
annual meeting may visit
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020, log in using the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow
on your proxy card, click on the vote button on the screen and follow the instructions provided.
electronically
the virtual
to vote
at
If you are a holder of record of the Whistler Blackcomb exchangeable shares:
Holders of exchangeable shares, which we refer to as the “Exchangeable Shares,” issued by Whistler Blackcomb Holdings,
Inc. (formerly known as 1068877 B.C. Ltd.), a Canadian subsidiary of ours (“Exchangeco”), are receiving these proxy materials
in accordance with the provisions of the Exchangeable Shares and the Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement (the “Trust
Agreement”), dated as of October 16, 2016, among the Company, 1089881 B.C. Ltd., Exchangeco and Computershare Trust
Company of Canada (the “Trustee”). The Exchangeable Shares are exchangeable for shares of the Company’s common stock on
a one-for-one basis.
In accordance with the Trust Agreement, holders of Exchangeable Shares are effectively provided with voting rights for
each Exchangeable Share that are nearly equivalent to the voting rights applicable to a share of the Company’s common stock,
and holders are entitled to instruct the Trustee as to how to vote their Exchangeable Shares. The Trustee holds one share of the
Company’s preferred stock designated as the “Special Voting Share.” The Special Voting Share entitles the Trustee to vote on
matters in which holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to vote. The Special Voting Share is entitled to a number
of votes equal to the number of Exchangeable Shares outstanding on the record date for determining holders of the Company’s
common stock entitled to vote and for which the Trustee has received voting instructions from the holders of such Exchangeable
Shares. The Special Voting Share shall vote together with the holders of the Company’s common stock as a single class.
In accordance with the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Company has undertaken to perform the obligations of the Trustee
and has authorized Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) to collect and receive directly the votes from the holders
of the Exchangeable Shares on its behalf. Based upon the foregoing, holders of Exchangeable shares are entitled to cast up to
35,607 votes at the annual meeting. However, Broadridge will receive and tabulate each vote attached to the Exchangeable Shares
53
only on the basis of instructions received from the holders of record of the Exchangeable Shares. In the absence of instructions
from a holder as to voting, Broadridge will not include the Exchangeable Shares held by such holder in the vote.
If you are a holder of record of Exchangeable Shares, you can vote your Exchangeable Shares:
By Telephone or the Internet
Holders of Exchangeable Shares of record can vote their shares via telephone or the Internet as instructed in the Notice of
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The telephone and Internet procedures are designed to authenticate a stockholder’s identity,
to allow stockholders to vote their shares and confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
The telephone and Internet voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 2, 2020.
By Mail
Holders of Exchangeable Shares who elect to vote by mail should request a paper proxy card by telephone or Internet and
should complete, sign and date their proxy cards and mail them in the pre-addressed envelopes that accompany the delivery of
paper proxy cards. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the meeting in order for your Exchangeable
Shares to be voted.
By Participating in the Virtual Annual Meeting
Holders of Exchangeable Shares who wish to vote electronically at the virtual annual meeting may visit
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MTN2020, log in using the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow
on your proxy card, click on the vote button on the screen and follow the instructions provided. You may also instruct Broadridge
to give a proxy to a designated representative of the Company to exercise such voting rights.
Only holders of Exchangeable Shares whose names appear on the records of Exchangeco as the registered holders of
Exchangeable Shares on the record date are entitled to exercise voting rights in respect of their Exchangeable Shares at the annual
meeting. If on the record date your Exchangeable Shares were held not in your name, but rather in the name of a nominee, then
you are the beneficial owner of Exchangeable Shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials, if you have received them,
are being forwarded to you by that nominee. The nominee holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for
purposes of voting your Exchangeable Shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote
your Exchangeable Shares in accordance with the instructions provided by your nominee.
Can I change my vote?
If you are a stockholder of record of common stock, you may change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the annual
meeting by:
•
•
•
providing timely delivery of a later-dated proxy (including by telephone or Internet vote);
providing timely written notice of revocation to our Secretary at 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado
80021; or
attending the virtual annual meeting and voting electronically.
To be timely, later dated proxy cards and written notices if revocation is submitted by mail, must be received by the time of
the annual meeting. In order to change your vote by telephone or Internet, you must do so before the telephone and Internet voting
facilities close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 2, 2020.
If you are a street name holder of common stock, you may change your vote by timely submitting new voting instructions
to your broker or other nominee following the instructions they provided, or, if you have obtained a valid proxy from your broker
or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the virtual meeting and voting electronically.
If you are a holder of Exchangeable Shares, you may revoke your voting instructions to Broadridge in accordance with the
voting direction provided by Broadridge.
How many shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the annual meeting?
The quorum requirement for holding the annual meeting and transacting business is that holders of a majority of the issued
and outstanding common stock that is entitled to vote must be present virtually or represented by proxy. Both abstentions and
broker non-votes described below are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. If there is no quorum,
the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy may adjourn the annual meeting to another
date.
54
How are abstentions treated?
Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. For purposes of determining whether the
stockholders have approved a matter, abstentions are not treated as votes cast affirmatively or negatively, and therefore do not
have any effect on the outcome of a matter to be voted on at the annual meeting that requires an affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast by holders of our common stock present virtually or by proxy at the annual meeting. A “majority of votes cast”
means the number of “FOR” votes exceeds the number of “AGAINST” votes.
What are the voting requirements?
Proposal 1—Election of Directors
In the election of directors named in this proxy statement, you may vote “FOR” one or more of the nominees or your vote
may be “AGAINST” one or more of the nominees. Alternatively, you may vote “ABSTAIN” with respect to one or more nominees.
You may not cumulate your votes for the election of directors. To be elected, each director nominee requires a majority of the
votes cast for his or her election, which means that each director nominee must receive more votes cast “FOR” than “AGAINST”
that director nominee. Abstentions are not treated as voting on this proposal. If stockholders do not elect a nominee who is already
serving as a director, Delaware law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director,” rather
than causing a vacancy, until a successor is duly elected or until the director resigns. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines
and as permitted by our Bylaws, each director has submitted an advance, contingent resignation that the Board may accept if
stockholders do not elect the director. In that situation, our Nominating & Governance Committee would make a recommendation
to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether to take other action. The Board will promptly publicly
disclose its decision regarding the director’s resignation.
Proposal 2—Ratification of Selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
In the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2021, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” This proposal requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present virtually or represented by proxy, entitled to vote, and actually voting
on the proposal at the annual meeting. Abstentions are not treated as voting on this proposal.
Proposal 3—Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
In the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” This proposal
requires the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present virtually or represented by proxy, entitled to vote, and actually
voting on the proposal at the annual meeting. Abstentions are not treated as voting on this proposal. The vote is advisory, and
therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will
review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation as it
deems appropriate.
What are “broker non-votes”?
If you hold shares in street name through a broker and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may
constitute “broker non-votes.” Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter
without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given by the beneficial owner. In tabulating the voting
result for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are considered present for purpose of determining a
quorum but are not considered entitled to vote or votes cast on that proposal. Thus, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more
readily attainable, but, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the annual meeting, assuming
that a quorum is obtained.
If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, your brokerage firm,
in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on “routine” matters. The proposal to ratify the selection
of our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year (Proposal 2) is considered a routine matter. Under
the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, the election of directors (Proposal 1) and the advisory vote to approve
executive compensation (Proposal 3) are not considered routine matters and, consequently, without your voting instructions, your
broker cannot vote your uninstructed shares on these proposals.
Who will serve as inspector of elections?
The inspector of elections will be a representative from Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
55
Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the annual meeting?
The Company is soliciting your proxy, and we will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the original solicitation
of proxies, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone or other means of communication, by our directors and employees.
Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies.
We may reimburse brokers holding common stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their expenses in
sending proxy material to the beneficial owners of such common stock.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?
If you receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, it means that you have multiple accounts
at the transfer agent or with brokers or other nominees. Please vote all of your shares as described herein, or follow the instructions
received from each broker or other nominee, to ensure that all of your shares are voted.
What if I submit a proxy but do not make specific choices?
If a proxy is voted by telephone or Internet, or is signed and returned by mail without choices specified, in the absence of
contrary instructions, the shares of common stock represented by such proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board, and
will be voted in the proxy holders’ discretion as to other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results will be reported in a Form 8-K,
which will be filed with the SEC following the annual meeting.
Annual Meeting Materials
The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and the Annual
Report have been made available to all stockholders and holders of Exchangeable Shares entitled to Notice of Internet Availability
of Proxy Materials and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. The Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement
and is not considered proxy-soliciting material.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2021 ANNUAL MEETING
The deadline for stockholders to submit proposals pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act for inclusion in the Company’s
proxy statement and proxy for the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders is June 23, 2021. Such proposals must be received at the
Company’s principal executive offices no later than such date.
If you wish to nominate a director or submit a proposal for consideration at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of
stockholders that is not to be included in next year’s proxy materials, your proposal or nomination must be submitted in writing
to the Secretary of the Company not later than September 4, 2021 nor earlier than August 5, 2021. You are also advised to review
our Bylaws, which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations. Such
notices must be in accordance with the procedures described in our Bylaws. You can obtain a copy of our Bylaws by writing the
Secretary at the address shown on the cover of this proxy statement.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers, to satisfy the delivery requirements
for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single
proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially
means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.
This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are Company stockholders may be “householding” our proxy
materials to the extent such stockholders have given their prior express or implied consent in accordance with SEC rules. A single
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statement and Annual Report (if you requested one) will be delivered to
multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once
you have received notice from your broker that they will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding”
will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate
in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statement and
Annual Report, please notify your broker to discontinue householding and direct your written request to receive a separate Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statement and Annual Report to the Company at: Vail Resorts, Inc., Attention:
56
Investor Relations, 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado, 80021, or by calling (303) 404-1800. Stockholders who
currently receive multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy statement and Annual Report at
their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.
OTHER MATTERS
At the date of this proxy statement, the Board has no knowledge of any business other than that described herein which will
be presented for consideration at the annual meeting. In the event any other business is presented at the annual meeting, the persons
named in the enclosed proxy will vote such proxy thereon in accordance with their judgment in the best interests of the Company.
October 21, 2020
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 is available without
charge upon written request to: Secretary, Vail Resorts, Inc., 390 Interlocken Crescent, Broomfield, Colorado 80021.
David T. Shapiro
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
57
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-09614
Vail Resorts, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
51-0291762
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
390 Interlocken Crescent
Broomfield, Colorado
(Address of principal executive offices)
80021
(Zip Code)
(303) 404-1800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol
MTN
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller
reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller
reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
No
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the
closing price of $234.51 per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on January 31, 2020 (the last
business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $9,336,675,376.
As of September 21, 2020, 40,189,225 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission within 120 days of July 31, 2020 are incorporated by reference herein into Part III, Items 10 through
14, of this Annual Report.
Table of Contents
PART I
Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
PART III
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Form 10-K Summary
PART IV
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.
4
18
33
33
36
36
37
38
41
66
67
112
112
113
113
113
113
114
114
114
117
1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for any historical information contained herein, the matters discussed or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K”) contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws.
These statements relate to analyses and other information, available as of the date hereof which are based on forecasts of future
results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also relate to our contemplated future prospects,
developments and business strategies.
These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will” and similar terms and phrases, including references to
assumptions. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the ultimate duration of COVID-19 and its short-term and long-term impacts on consumer behaviors, the economy
generally, and our business and results of operations, including the ultimate amount of refunds that we would be
required to refund to our pass product holders for qualifying circumstances under our recently launched Epic Coverage
program;
the willingness of our guests to travel due to terrorism, the uncertainty of military conflicts or outbreaks of contagious
diseases (such as the current outbreak of COVID-19), and the cost and availability of travel options and changing
consumer preferences or willingness to travel;
prolonged weakness in general economic conditions, including adverse effects on the overall travel and leisure related
industries;
unfavorable weather conditions or the impact of natural disasters;
risks related to our reliance on information technology, including our failure to maintain the integrity of our customer
or employee data and our ability to adapt to technological developments or industry trends;
risks related to cyber-attacks;
the seasonality of our business combined with adverse events that may occur during our peak operating periods;
competition in our mountain and lodging businesses;
the high fixed cost structure of our business;
our ability to fund resort capital expenditures;
risks related to a disruption in our water supply that would impact our snowmaking capabilities and operations;
our reliance on government permits or approvals for our use of public land or to make operational and capital
improvements;
risks related to federal, state, local and foreign government laws, rules and regulations;
risks related to changes in security and privacy laws and regulations which could increase our operating costs and
adversely affect our ability to market our products, properties and services effectively;
risks related to our workforce, including increased labor costs, loss of key personnel and our ability to hire and retain
a sufficient seasonal workforce;
adverse consequences of current or future legal claims;
a deterioration in the quality or reputation of our brands, including our ability to protect our intellectual property and
the risk of accidents at our mountain resorts;
our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses, or that acquired businesses may fail to perform in accordance
with expectations, including Peak Resorts, Hotham, Falls Creek or future acquisitions;
our ability to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with respect to acquired
businesses;
risks associated with international operations;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates where the Company has foreign currency exposure, primarily the
Canadian and Australian dollars, as compared to the U.S. dollar;
changes in accounting judgments and estimates, accounting principles, policies or guidelines or adverse determinations
by taxing authorities, as well as risks associated with uncertainty of the impact of tax reform legislation in the United
States;
risks related to our indebtedness and our ability to satisfy our debt service requirements under our outstanding debt
including our unsecured senior notes, which could reduce our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations,
capital expenditures, future business opportunities and other purposes;
a materially adverse change in our financial condition; and
other risks and uncertainties included under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this document.
2
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or any persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by
these cautionary statements.
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary
materially from those expected, estimated or projected. Given these uncertainties, users of the information included or incorporated
by reference in this Form 10-K, including investors and prospective investors, are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements that we
make for a number of reasons including those described above and in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K. All
forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof. Except as may be required by law, we do not intend to update
these forward-looking statements, even if new information, future events or other circumstances have made them incorrect or
misleading.
3
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
Vail Resorts, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is referred to throughout this document as “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company.”
Vail Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was organized as a holding company in 1997 and operates through various subsidiaries.
Our operations are grouped into three business segments: Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate, which represented approximately
87%, 13% and 0%, respectively, of our net revenue for our fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 (“Fiscal 2020”).
As of July 31, 2020, our Mountain segment operates thirty-seven world-class destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas
(collectively, our “Resorts”). Additionally, the Mountain segment includes ancillary services, primarily including ski school, dining
and retail/rental operations.
In the Lodging segment, we own and/or manage a collection of luxury hotels and condominiums under our RockResorts brand;
other strategic lodging properties and a large number of condominiums located in proximity to our North American mountain
resorts; National Park Service (“NPS”) concessionaire properties including the Grand Teton Lodge Company (“GTLC”), which
operates destination resorts in Grand Teton National Park; a Colorado resort ground transportation company and mountain resort
golf courses.
We refer to “Resort” as the combination of the Mountain and Lodging segments. Our Real Estate segment owns, develops and
sells real estate in and around our resort communities.
For financial information and other information about the Company’s segments and geographic areas, see Item 7. “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
COVID-19 Impact
On March 14, 2020, we announced a temporary closure of our North American Resorts and retail/rental operations as a result of
the COVID-19 pandemic and as a precautionary measure for the safety of our guests and employees beginning on March 15, 2020.
Subsequently on March 17, 2020, we announced the early closure of the 2019/2020 North American ski season for our North
American Resorts, lodging properties and retail stores. Additionally, the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in
restrictions, limitations or closures of our 2020 Australian ski area operations and 2020 North American summer operations. Two
of our Australian ski areas, Mount Hotham and Falls Creek, opened for their 2020 winter season on July 6, 2020, but we decided
to close them four days later due to a “stay at home” order put in place by the Victorian government and specifically for the
Melbourne metropolitan area, which represents the majority of visitors for Mount Hotham and Falls Creek, as a result of a
reemergence of COVID-19 in the region. These actions and the risks, trends and uncertainties related to COVID-19 are discussed
in further detail throughout this document because the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant adverse impact on our results
of operations for Fiscal 2020 and is expected to have a continued negative impact on our results of operations for the year ending
July 31, 2021 (“Fiscal 2021”).
4
Mountain Segment
In the Mountain segment, the Company operates the following 37 destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas, including
six resorts within the top ten most visited resorts in the United States for the 2019/2020 North American ski season, as well as
Whistler Blackcomb, the most visited resort in North America:
*Denotes a destination mountain resort, which generally receives a meaningful portion of skier visits from long-distance travelers,
as opposed to our regional ski areas, which tend to generate skier visits predominantly from their respective local markets.
Our Mountain segment derives revenue through the sale of lift tickets, including pass products, as well as a comprehensive offering
of amenities available to guests, including ski and snowboard lessons, equipment rentals and retail merchandise sales, a variety
of dining venues, private club operations and other winter and summer recreational activities. In addition to providing extensive
guest amenities, we also lease some of our owned and leased commercial space to third party operators to add unique restaurants
and retail stores to the mix of amenities at the base of our resorts.
Many of our destination mountain resorts are year-round mountain resorts that provide a comprehensive resort experience to a
diverse clientele with an attractive demographic profile. We offer a broad complement of winter and summer recreational activities,
including skiing, snowboarding, snowshoeing, snowtubing, sightseeing, mountain biking, guided hiking, zip lines, challenge ropes
courses, alpine slides, mountain coasters, children’s activities and other recreational activities. Collectively, our Resorts are located
in close proximity to population centers totaling over 100 million people.
Destination Mountain Resorts
The below U.S. visitation data for the 2019/2020 ski season is representative of visitation through mid-March 2020, at which point
our Resorts closed early for the season as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and therefore the visitation results are not necessarily
comparable to a full ski season.
Rocky Mountains (Colorado and Utah Resorts)
• Breckenridge Ski Resort (“Breckenridge”) - the most visited mountain resort in the United States (“U.S.”) for the
2019/2020 ski season with five interconnected peaks offering an expansive variety of terrain for every skill level, including
access to above tree line intermediate and expert terrain, and progressive and award-winning terrain parks.
5
•
Park City Resort (“Park City”) - the second most visited mountain resort in the U.S. for the 2019/2020 ski season and
the largest by acreage in the U.S. Park City offers 7,300 acres of skiable terrain for every type of skier and snowboarder
and offers guests an outstanding ski experience with fine dining, ski school, retail and lodging.
• Vail Mountain Resort (“Vail Mountain”) - the third most visited mountain resort in the U.S. for the 2019/2020 ski season.
Vail Mountain offers some of the most expansive and varied terrain in North America with approximately 5,300 skiable
acres including seven world renowned back bowls and the resort’s rustic Blue Sky Basin.
• Keystone Resort (“Keystone”) - the fourth most visited mountain resort in the U.S. for the 2019/2020 ski season and
home to the highly renowned A51 Terrain Park, as well as the largest area of night skiing in Colorado. Keystone also
offers guests a unique skiing opportunity through guided snow cat ski tours accessing five bowls. Keystone is a premier
destination for families with its “Kidtopia” program focused on providing activities for kids on and off the mountain.
• Beaver Creek Resort (“Beaver Creek”) - the ninth most visited mountain resort in the U.S. for the 2019/2020 ski season.
Beaver Creek is a European-style resort with multiple villages and also includes a world renowned children’s ski school
program focused on providing a first-class experience with unique amenities such as a dedicated children’s gondola.
• Crested Butte Mountain Resort (“Crested Butte”) - acquired in September 2018, Crested Butte is located in southwest
Colorado and includes over 1,500 skiable acres and over 3,000 feet of vertical drop. Crested Butte is known for its historic
town, iconic mountain peaks and legendary skiing and riding terrain.
Pacific Northwest (British Columbia, Canada)
• Whistler Blackcomb (“Whistler Blackcomb”) - located in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia, Canada,
approximately 85 miles from the Vancouver International Airport, Whistler Blackcomb is the most visited and largest
year-round mountain resort in North America, with two mountains connected by the PEAK 2 PEAK gondola, which
combined offer over 200 marked runs, over 8,000 acres of terrain, 14 alpine bowls, three glaciers and one of the longest
ski seasons in North America. In the summer Whistler Blackcomb offers a variety of activities, including hiking trails, a
bike park and sightseeing. Whistler Blackcomb is a popular destination for international visitors and was home to the
2010 Winter Olympics.
Lake Tahoe Resorts
• Heavenly Mountain Resort (“Heavenly”) - the tenth most visited mountain resort in the U.S. for the 2019/2020 ski season.
Heavenly is located near the South Shore of Lake Tahoe with over 4,800 skiable acres, straddling the border of California
and Nevada and offers unique and spectacular views of Lake Tahoe. Heavenly offers great nightlife, including its proximity
to several casinos.
• Northstar Resort (“Northstar”) - located near the North Shore of Lake Tahoe, Northstar is the premier luxury mountain
resort destination near Lake Tahoe which offers premium lodging, a vibrant base area and over 3,000 skiable acres.
Northstar’s village features high-end shops and restaurants, a conference center and a 9,000 square-foot skating rink.
• Kirkwood Mountain Resort (“Kirkwood”) - located about 35 miles southwest of South Lake Tahoe, offering a unique
location atop the Sierra Crest, Kirkwood is recognized for offering some of the best high alpine advanced terrain in North
America with 2,000 feet of vertical drop and over 2,300 acres of terrain.
Regional Ski Areas
Our ski resort network allows us to connect guests with drive-to access and destination resort access on a single season pass
product. Building a presence near major metropolitan areas with large populations enables us to drive advanced commitment pass
sales among a broad array of guests.
Northeast
We own and operate eight regional ski areas in the Northeast that we believe provide a compelling regional and local connection
to guests within driving distance from the New York, Boston and the greater New England markets. Stowe is the premier, high-
end regional ski area in the Northeast offering outstanding skiing and an exceptional base area experience. Okemo and Mount
Snow are compelling regional destinations serving guests in the New York metropolitan area and throughout New England. Hunter
Mountain is a day-trip ski area primarily serving the New York metropolitan area. Additionally, we own four ski areas in New
Hampshire serving guests throughout New England.
6
Mid-Atlantic (Pennsylvania)
We own and operate five ski areas in the Mid-Atlantic region serving guests in Philadelphia, Southern New Jersey, Baltimore and
Washington D.C. Our presence in the region allows us to offer compelling local options and easy overnight weekend and holiday
trips to our premium Northeast regional ski areas, which are within driving distance from these markets.
Midwest
We own and operate ten ski areas in the Midwest that draw guests from Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Indianapolis,
Cleveland, Columbus, Kansas City and Louisville. Located within close proximity to major metropolitan markets, these ski areas
provide beginners with easy access to beginner ski programs and offer night skiing for young adults and families. Additionally,
the proximity of these ski areas allows for regular usage by avid skiers.
Pacific Northwest (U.S.)
Stevens Pass Resort (“Stevens Pass’’) - acquired in August 2018, Stevens Pass is located less than 85 miles from Seattle and sits
on the crest of Washington State’s Cascade Range. Stevens Pass offers terrain for all levels across 1,125 acres of skiable terrain.
Australia
Australia is an important market for both domestic skiing during the Australian winter and as a source of international visitation
to the Northern Hemisphere in the Australian off-season, with over one million estimated Australian skier visits annually to North
America, Europe and Japan. We own three of the five largest ski areas in Australia, which we serve with the Epic Australia Pass,
an Australian dollar denominated pass product marketed specifically to Australian guests. Perisher, located in New South Wales,
is the largest ski resort in Australia and targets guests in the Sydney metropolitan area and the broader New South Wales market,
while Falls Creek and Mount Hotham are two of the largest ski areas in Victoria and target guests in the Melbourne metropolitan
area and the broader Victoria market.
Ski Industry/Competition
There are approximately 770 ski areas in North America with approximately 475 in the U.S., ranging from small ski area operations
that service day skiers to large resorts that attract both day skiers and destination resort guests looking for a comprehensive vacation
experience. During the 2019/2020 North American ski season, combined skier visits for all ski areas in North America were
approximately 68.2 million, which was lower than historical levels due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting early resort
closures in March across the United States and Canada. During the 2018/2019 North American ski season (the ski season
immediately prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic), combined skier visits for all ski areas in North America were
approximately 79.7 million. Our North American Resorts had approximately 12.4 million skier visits during the 2019/2020 ski
season, representing approximately 18.2% of North American skier visits.
There is limited opportunity for development of new destination ski resorts due to the limited private lands on which ski areas can
be built, the difficulty in obtaining the appropriate governmental approvals to build on public lands and the significant capital
needed to construct the necessary infrastructure. As such, there have been virtually no new destination ski resorts in North America
for over 35 years, which has and should continue to allow the best-positioned destination resorts to benefit from future industry
growth. Our resorts compete with other major destination mountain resorts, including, among others, Aspen Snowmass, Copper
Mountain, Mammoth, Deer Valley, Snowbird, Squaw Valley USA, Killington, Sierra at Tahoe, Steamboat, Jackson Hole and Winter
Park, as well as other ski areas in Colorado, California, Nevada, Utah, the Pacific Northwest, the Northeast, Southwest and British
Columbia, Canada, and other destination ski areas worldwide as well as non-ski related vacation options and destinations.
Additionally, our pass products compete with other multi-resort frequency and pass products in North America, including the
IKON Pass, the Mountain Collective Pass and various regional and local pass products.
The ski industry statistics stated in this section have been derived primarily from data published by Colorado Ski Country USA,
Canadian Ski Council, Kottke National End of Season Surveys as well as other industry publications.
Our Competitive Strengths
Our premier resorts and business model differentiate our Company from the rest of the ski industry. We own and operate some of
the most iconic, branded destination mountain resorts in geographically diverse and important ski destinations in Colorado, Utah,
Lake Tahoe and the Pacific Northwest, including British Columbia, Canada. These resorts are complemented by regional ski areas
in the Northeast, Pacific Northwest, Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions, which are strategically positioned near key U.S. population
centers, as well as three ski areas in Australia. Through our data-driven marketing analytics and personalized marketing capabilities,
we target increased penetration of ski pass products, providing our guests with a strong value proposition in return for guests
committing to ski at our resorts prior to, or very early into the ski season, which we believe attracts more guests to our resorts. We
7
believe we invest in more capital improvements than our competitors and we create synergies by operating multiple resorts, which
enhances our profitability by enabling customers to access our network of resorts with our pass products. Most of our destination
mountain resorts located in the U.S. typically rank in the most visited ski resorts in the U.S. (six of the top ten for the 2019/2020
U.S. ski season), and most of our destination mountain resorts consistently rank in the top ranked ski resorts in North America
according to industry surveys, which we attribute to our ability to provide a high-quality experience.
We believe the following factors contribute directly to each Resort’s success:
Exceptional Mountain Experience
• World-Class Mountain Resorts and Integrated Base Resort Areas
Our mountain resorts offer a multitude of skiing and snowboarding experiences for the beginner, intermediate, advanced
and expert levels. Each mountain resort is fully integrated into expansive resort base areas offering a broad array of
lodging, dining, retail, nightlife and other amenities, some of which we own or manage, to our guests.
•
Snow Conditions
Our Resorts in the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado and Utah, the Sierra Nevada Mountains in Lake Tahoe and the
Coast Mountains in British Columbia, Canada receive average annual snowfall between 20 and 39 feet. Even in these
areas which receive abundant snowfall, we have invested in significant snowmaking systems that help provide a more
consistent experience, especially in the early season. During Fiscal 2020, we completed significant investments in our
snowmaking systems in Colorado that transformed the early-season terrain experience at Vail, Keystone and Beaver
Creek. Our other ski areas receive less snowfall than our western North American mountain resorts, but we have invested
in snowmaking operations at these resorts in order to provide a consistent experience for our guests. Additionally, we
provide several hundred acres of groomed terrain at each of our mountain resorts with extensive fleets of snow grooming
equipment.
• Lift Service
We systematically upgrade our lifts and put in new lifts to increase uphill capacity and streamline skier traffic to maximize
the guest experience. In the past several years, we have installed or upgraded several high speed chairlifts and gondolas
across our mountain resorts, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
upgrading the Daisy and Brooks fixed-grip lifts at Stevens Pass to four-person high-speed lifts;
upgrading the Teocalli fixed-grip lift at Crested Butte to a four-person high-speed lift;
installing a new four-person lift at Park City, Over and Out;
replacing the Leichardt T-bar lift at Perisher with a new four-person lift;
installing a new 10-person gondola running from the base to the top of Blackcomb Mountain, replacing the
Wizard and Solar four person chairs with a single state-of-the-art gondola;
upgrading the four-person Emerald express lift to a high speed six-person lift on Whistler Mountain;
upgrading the three-person fixed grip Catskinner lift to a four-person high speed lift at Blackcomb Mountain;
upgrading the fixed-grip High Meadow lift to a four-person high speed lift at the Canyons area of Park City;
replacing the Galaxy two-person lift with a three-person lift at Heavenly,
replacing each of the Northwoods lift at Vail Mountain, the Peak 10 Falcon SuperChair at Breckenridge and the
Montezuma lift at Keystone with new high speed, six-passenger lifts; and
upgrading the Drink of Water lift at Beaver Creek with a new high speed, four-person lift.
On April 1, 2020 we announced a reduction in our capital plan for calendar year 2020 in order to maintain a strong
liquidity position in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The vast majority of these savings will result from the deferral
of many of our discretionary capital projects. We are planning to defer all new chair lifts, terrain expansions and other
mountain and base area improvements, while continuing with the vast majority of our maintenance capital spending.
• Terrain Parks
Our mountain resorts and urban ski areas are committed to leading the industry in terrain park design, education and
events for the growing segment of freestyle skiers and snowboarders. Each of our mountain resorts has multiple terrain
parks that include progressively-challenging features. These park structures, coupled with freestyle ski school programs,
promote systematic learning from basic to professional skills.
8
Extraordinary Service and Amenities
• Commitment to the Guest Experience
Our focus is to provide quality service at every touch point of the guest journey. Prior to arrival at our mountain resorts,
guests can receive personal assistance through our full-service, central reservations group and through our comprehensive
websites to book desired lodging accommodations, lift tickets and pass products, ski school lessons, equipment rentals,
activities and other resort services. Upon arrival, our resort staff serve as ambassadors to engage guests, answer questions
and create a customer-focused environment. We offer EpicMix, an online and mobile application that, through radio
frequency technology, captures a guest’s activity on the mountain (e.g. number of ski days, vertical feet skied and chairlift
activity); allows a guest to share his or her experience, photos and accomplishments with family and friends on social
networks; allows guests to access real time lift line wait times; and allows our ski school instructors to certify the attainment
of certain skills and ski levels. We also offer the world’s first digital mountain assistant (“EMMA”), which uses artificial
intelligence and natural language processing to offer information on everything from grooming, lift line wait times and
parking, in addition to recommendations on rentals, lessons and dining options. We have also invested in lift ticket express
fulfillment through new mobile technology by allowing lift ticket purchasers that buy online to bypass the ticket window.
Additionally, we are focused on improving the guest ski/snowboard rental experience by eliminating the need for a guest
to wait in several lines with the recent introduction of a new “pod” concept in several of our high-volume locations.
We also solicit guest feedback through a variety of surveys and results, which are used to ensure high levels of customer
satisfaction, understand trends and develop future resort programs and amenities. We then utilize this guest feedback to
help us focus our capital spending and operational efforts to the areas of the greatest need.
•
Season Pass & Epic Day Pass Products
We offer a variety of pass products, primarily season pass and Epic Day Pass products, for all of our Resorts that are
marketed towards both out-of-state and international (“Destination”) guests as well as in-state and local (“Local”) guests.
These pass products are available for purchase prior to the start of the ski season, offering our guests a better value in
exchange for their commitment to ski at our Resorts before the season begins. Our pass program drives strong customer
loyalty and mitigates exposure to more weather sensitive guests, leading to greater revenue stability and allowing us to
capture valuable guest data. Additionally, our pass product customers typically ski more days each season than those
guests who do not buy pass products, which leads to additional ancillary spending. Our pass products generated
approximately 51% of our total lift revenue for Fiscal 2020, which includes the effects of the early closure of our Resorts
as well as the deferral of approximately $121 million of pass product revenue from Fiscal 2020 into Fiscal 2021 as a
result of pass credits that we offered to 2019/2020 pass holders who renewed for the 2020/2021 ski season. In addition,
our pass products attract new guests to our Resorts. Sales of pass products are a key component of our overall Mountain
segment revenue and help create strong synergies among our Resorts. Our pass products range from providing access for
a certain number of days to one or a combination of our Resorts to our Epic Pass which provides unrestricted and unlimited
access to all of our Resorts. The Epic Day Pass is a customizable one- to seven-day pass product, purchased in advance
of the season, for those skiers and riders who expect to ski a certain number of days during the season. All of our various
pass product options can be found on our consumer website www.snow.com. Information on our websites does not
constitute part of this document.
As part of our continued strategy to drive pass product sales and create a stronger connection between key skier markets
and our iconic destination mountain resorts, we have continued to expand our portfolio of properties in recent years. In
September 2019, we acquired Peak Resorts, Inc., which added 17 regional ski areas strategically located near key U.S.
population centers in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest regions. In April 2019, we acquired Falls Creek and
Hotham, located in Victoria, Australia, expanding our portfolio of Australian ski resorts to complement Perisher, which
we acquired in June 2015. Australia is an important international ski market, estimated to generate more than one million
skier visits annually to resorts in North America, Japan and Europe. Stevens Pass in Washington State, acquired in August
2018, is located 85 miles from Seattle and 250 miles from Whistler Blackcomb, a world-renowned international skiing
destination which receives more than two million skier visits each year, which we acquired in October 2016. We have
also made strategic acquisitions of mountain resorts located in the Northeast U.S. recently, including Okemo in Vermont
(acquired in September 2018), Mount Sunapee in New Hampshire (acquired in September 2018) and Stowe in Vermont
(acquired in June 2017). These ski areas are premier, high-end ski destinations for skiers and snowboarders on the East
Coast, which draw visitors from New York City, Boston and the broader Northeast skier population. Additionally, we
enter into strategic long-term season pass alliance agreements with third-party mountain resorts including Telluride Ski
Resort in Colorado, Sun Valley Resort in Idaho, Snowbasin Resort in Utah, Hakuba Valley and Rusutsu Resort in Japan,
9
Resorts of the Canadian Rockies in Canada, Les 3 Vallées in France, 4 Vallées in Switzerland, Skirama Dolomiti in Italy
and Ski Arlberg in Austria, which further increases the value proposition of our pass products.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we closed our North American Resorts and retail stores beginning on March 15,
2020. To encourage our pass product holders to renew their pass purchases for next season following the early closures
this spring, we announced a credit offer for all existing 2019/2020 North American ski season pass product holders to
purchase 2020/2021 North American ski season pass products at a discount (the “Credit Offer”). The Credit Offer provides
discounts ranging from a minimum of 20% to a maximum of 80% for season pass holders, depending on the number of
days the pass holder used their pass product during the 2019/2020 season and a credit, with no minimum, but up to 80%
for multi-day pass products, such as the Epic Day Pass, based on total unused days. We also announced that we would
be implementing a reservation system for our 34 North American Resorts for the 2020/2021 North American ski season,
which will only be available for pass holders during the early season (paid lift tickets will not be sold until December 8,
2020).
For the upcoming 2020/2021 North American ski season, we have introduced Epic Mountain Rewards; a program which
gives pass product holders a discount of 20% off on-mountain food and beverage, lodging, group ski and ride school
lessons, equipment rentals and more at the Company’s North American Resorts. Epic Mountain Rewards is available for
everyone who purchases an Epic Pass, Epic Local Pass, Epic Day Pass, Epic Military Pass and most of our other pass
products, regardless of whether guests plan to ski one day or every day of the season. Additionally, we introduced Epic
Coverage for the 2020/2021 North American ski season, which is free for all pass holders, completely replaces the need
for pass insurance, and provides expanded coverage over our historical pass insurance program. Epic Coverage provides
refunds in the event of certain resort closures (e.g. for COVID-19), giving pass product holders a refund for any portion
of the season that is lost due to qualifying circumstances. Additionally, Epic Coverage provides a refund for personal
circumstances that were historically covered by our pass insurance program, such as eligible injuries, job losses and many
other personal events, as well as in the event that the pass holder cannot reserve their preferred days.
•
Premier Ski Schools
Our mountain resorts are home to some of the highest quality and most widely recognized ski and snowboard schools in
the industry. Through a combination of outstanding training and abundant work opportunities, our ski schools have become
home to many of the most experienced and credentialed professionals in the business. We complement our instructor
staff with state-of-the-art facilities and extensive learning terrain, all with a keen attention to guest needs. We offer a wide
variety of adult and child group and private lesson options with a goal of creating lifelong skiers and riders and showcasing
to our guests all the terrain our resorts have to offer.
• Dining
Our Resorts provide a variety of quality on-mountain and base village dining venues, ranging from top-rated fine dining
restaurants to trailside express food service outlets. We normally operate approximately 310 dining venues at our Resorts,
although there will be some restrictions or limitations for the upcoming 2020/2021 North American ski season as a result
of the impacts of COVID-19 and to ensure the safety of our guests and employees. Food options in quick-service restaurants
will be more limited this season, with just a handful of ready-to-go hot and cold options and no ability for any custom or
special orders. We will be spacing tables in seating areas as well to allow for physical distancing while eating, and we
will also be maintaining as much outdoor seating as we can.
• Retail/Rental
We have approximately 330 retail/rental locations specializing in sporting goods including ski, snowboard and cycling
equipment. In addition to providing a major retail/rental presence at each of our Resorts, we also have retail/rental locations
throughout the Colorado Front Range, the San Francisco Bay Area, Salt Lake City and Minneapolis. Many of our retail/
rental locations near key population centers also offer prime venues for selling our pass products.
10
• On-Mountain Activities
We are a ski industry leader in providing comprehensive destination vacation experiences, including on-mountain activities
designed to appeal to a broad range of interests. In addition to our exceptional ski experiences, guests can choose from
a variety of non-ski related activities such as snowtubing, snowshoeing, guided snowmobile and scenic snow cat tours,
backcountry expeditions, horse-drawn sleigh rides and high altitude dining. During a normal summer season, our mountain
resorts offer non-ski related recreational activities and provide guests with a wide array of options including scenic chairlift
and gondola rides; mountain biking; horseback riding; guided hiking; 4x4 Jeep tours; and our Epic Discovery program
at Vail Mountain, Heavenly and Breckenridge, although some of these activities were restricted or limited for the most
recent summer season as a result of the impacts of COVID-19 and to ensure the safety of our guests and employees. The
Epic Discovery program encourages “learn through play” by featuring extensive environmental educational elements
interspersed between numerous activities, consisting of zip lines, children’s activities, challenge ropes courses, tubing,
mountain excursions, an alpine slide and alpine coasters.
• Lodging and Real Estate
High quality lodging options are an integral part of providing a complete resort experience. Our owned and managed
hotels and resorts proximate to our mountain resorts, including six RockResorts branded properties and a significant
inventory of managed condominium units, provide numerous accommodation options for our mountain resort guests.
Our recent real estate efforts have primarily focused on the potential to expand our destination bed base and upgrade our
resorts through the sale of land parcels to third-party developers, which in turn provides opportunity for the development
of condominiums, luxury hotels, parking and commercial space for restaurants and retail shops. Our Lodging and Real
Estate segments have and continue to invest in resort related assets and amenities or seek opportunities to expand and
enhance the overall resort experience.
Lodging Segment
Our Lodging segment includes owned and managed lodging properties, including those under our luxury hotel management
company, RockResorts; managed condominium units which are in and around our mountain resorts in Colorado, Lake Tahoe,
Utah, Vermont, New York and British Columbia, Canada; two NPS concessionaire properties in and near Grand Teton National
Park in Wyoming; a resort ground transportation company in Colorado; and company-owned and operated mountain resort golf
courses, including five in Colorado; one in Wyoming; three in Vermont; one in Lake Tahoe, California; one in Park City, Utah;
and two in Pennsylvania. For additional property details, see Item 2. “Properties”.
The Lodging segment currently includes approximately 6,000 owned and managed hotel rooms and condominium units. Our
lodging strategy seeks to complement and enhance our mountain resort operations through our ownership or management of
lodging properties and condominiums proximate to our mountain resorts and selective management of luxury resorts in premier
destination locations.
In addition to our portfolio of owned and managed luxury resort hotels and other hotels and properties, our lodging business also
features a Colorado ground transportation company, which represents the first point of contact with many of our guests when they
arrive by air to Colorado. We offer year-round ground transportation from Denver International Airport and Eagle County Airport
to the Vail Valley (locations in and around Vail, Beaver Creek, Avon and Edwards), Aspen (locations in and around Aspen and
Snowmass) and Summit County (which includes Keystone, Breckenridge, Copper Mountain, Frisco and Silverthorne).
Lodging Industry/Market
Hotels are categorized by Smith Travel Research, a leading lodging industry research firm, as luxury, upper upscale, upscale, mid-
price and economy. The service quality and level of accommodations of our RockResorts’ hotels place them in the luxury segment,
which represents hotels achieving the highest average daily rates (“ADR”) in the industry, and includes such brands as the Four
Seasons, Ritz-Carlton and Starwood’s Luxury Collection hotels. Our other hotels are categorized in the upper upscale and upscale
segments of the hotel market. The luxury and upper upscale segments consist of approximately 615,000 rooms at approximately
2,000 properties in the U.S. as of July 2020. For Fiscal 2020, our owned hotels, which include a combination of certain RockResort
hotels as well as other hotels in proximity to our Resorts, had an overall ADR of $266.43, a paid occupancy rate of 45.9% and
revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) of $122.34, as compared to the upper upscale segment’s ADR of $182.00, a paid occupancy
rate of 53.5% and RevPAR of $97.30. We believe that this comparison to the upper upscale segment is appropriate as our mix of
owned hotels include those in the luxury and upper upscale segments, as well as certain of our hotels that fall in the upscale
segment. The highly seasonal nature of our lodging properties generally results in lower average occupancy as compared to the
upper upscale segment of the lodging industry as a whole.
11
Competition
Competition in the hotel industry is generally based on quality and consistency of rooms, restaurants, meeting facilities and services,
the attractiveness of locations, availability of a global distribution system and price. Our properties compete within their geographic
markets with hotels and resorts that include locally-owned independent hotels, as well as facilities owned or managed by national
and international chains, including such brands as Four Seasons, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, Ritz-Carlton, Starwood’s Luxury
Collection and Westin. Our properties also compete for convention and conference business across the national market. We believe
we are highly competitive in the resort hotel niche for the following reasons:
•
•
all of our hotels are located in unique, highly desirable resort destinations;
our hotel portfolio has achieved some of the most prestigious hotel designations in the world, including two properties
in our portfolio that are currently rated as AAA 4-Diamond;
• many of our hotels (both owned and managed) are designed to provide a look that feels indigenous to their
surroundings, enhancing the guest’s vacation experience;
•
each of our RockResorts hotels provides the same high level of quality and services, while still providing unique
characteristics which distinguish the resorts from one another. This appeals to travelers looking for consistency in
quality and service offerings together with an experience more unique than typically offered by larger luxury hotel
chains;
• many of the hotels in our portfolio provide a wide array of amenities available to the guest such as access to world-
class ski and golf resorts, spa and fitness facilities, water sports and a number of other outdoor activities, as well as
highly acclaimed dining options;
conference space with the latest technology is available at most of our hotels. In addition, guests at Keystone can
use our company-owned Keystone Conference Center, the largest conference facility in the Colorado Rocky Mountain
region with more than 100,000 square feet of meeting, exhibit and function space;
•
• we have a central reservations system that leverages off of our mountain resort reservations system and has an online
planning and booking platform, offering our guests a seamless and useful way to make reservations at our resorts;
and
• we actively upgrade the quality of the accommodations and amenities available at our hotels through capital
improvements. Capital funding for third-party owned properties is provided by the owners of those properties to
maintain standards required by our management contracts. Projects at our owned properties completed over the past
several years include extensive refurbishments and upgrades to the Grand Summit Hotel, Colter Bay Village Cabins,
and DoubleTree by Hilton Breckenridge. Additionally, we have completed guest room renovations at the Keystone
Lodge and The Pines Lodge.
National Park Concessionaire Properties
We own GTLC, which is based in the Jackson Hole area in Wyoming and operates within Grand Teton National Park under a 15-
year concessionaire agreement with the NPS that expires December 31, 2021. We also own Flagg Ranch, located in Moran,
Wyoming and centrally located between Yellowstone National Park and Grand Teton National Park on the John D. Rockefeller,
Jr. Memorial Parkway (the “Parkway”). Flagg Ranch operates under a 15-year concessionaire agreement with the NPS that expires
October 31, 2026. GTLC also owns Jackson Hole Golf & Tennis Club (“JHG&TC”), located outside Grand Teton National Park
near Jackson, Wyoming. GTLC’s operations within Grand Teton National Park and JHG&TC have operating seasons that generally
run from June through the end of September. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and in response to guidance from the NPS,
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other local and national health authorities, operations for the 2020 season were
limited or adjusted. This included closures of Jackson Lake Lodge and Jenny Lake lodge for the season, as well as the temporary
closure of many facilities and restrictions on guided activities, in-restaurant dining and stayover housekeeping service for cabins.
We primarily compete with such companies as Aramark Parks & Resorts, Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts, Forever
Resorts and Xanterra Parks & Resorts in retaining and obtaining NPS concessionaire agreements. Four full-service concessionaires
provide accommodations within Grand Teton National Park, including GTLC. In a normal operating season, GTLC offers three
lodging options within Grand Teton National Park: Jackson Lake Lodge, a full-service, 385-room resort with 17,000 square feet
of conference facilities; Jenny Lake Lodge, a small, rustically elegant retreat with 37 cabins; and Colter Bay Village, a facility
with 166 log cabins, 66 tent cabins, 337 campsites and a 112-space recreational vehicle park. GTLC offers dining options as
extensive as its lodging options, with cafeterias, casual eateries and fine dining establishments. GTLC’s resorts provide a wide
range of activities for guests to enjoy, including cruises on Jackson Lake, boat rentals, horseback riding, guided fishing, float trips,
golf and guided Grand Teton National Park tours. As a result of the extensive amenities offered, as well as the tremendous popularity
of the National Park System, GTLC’s accommodations within Grand Teton National Park operate near full capacity during their
operating season.
12
Real Estate Segment
We have extensive holdings of real property at our mountain resorts primarily throughout Summit and Eagle Counties in Colorado.
Our real estate operations, through Vail Resorts Development Company (“VRDC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, include planning,
oversight, infrastructure improvement, development, marketing and sale of our real property holdings. In addition to the cash flow
generated from real estate development sales, these development activities benefit our Mountain and Lodging segments by (1)
creating additional resort lodging and other resort related facilities and venues (primarily restaurants, spas, commercial space,
private mountain clubs, skier services facilities and parking structures) that provide us with the opportunity to create new sources
of recurring revenue, enhance the guest experience and expand our destination bed base; (2) controlling the architectural themes
of our resorts; and (3) expanding our property management and commercial leasing operations.
The principal activities of our Real Estate segment include the sale of land parcels to third-party developers and planning for future
real estate development projects, including zoning and acquisition of applicable permits. We continue undertaking preliminary
planning and design work on future projects and are pursuing opportunities with third-party developers rather than undertaking
our own significant vertical development projects. We believe that, due to the low carrying cost of our real estate land investments,
we are well situated to promote future projects with third-party developers while limiting our financial risk.
Marketing and Sales
Our Mountain segment’s marketing and sales efforts are focused on leveraging marketing analytics to drive targeted and
personalized marketing to our existing and prospective guests. We capture guest data on the vast majority of guest transactions
through sales of our pass products, our e-commerce platforms including mobile lift ticket sales, the EpicMix application and our
lift ticket windows. We promote our Resorts using guest-centric omni-channel marketing campaigns leveraging email, direct mail,
promotional programs, digital marketing (including social, search and display) and traditional media advertising where appropriate
(e.g. targeted print, TV and radio). We also have marketing programs directed at attracting groups, corporate meetings and
convention business. Most of our marketing efforts drive traffic to our websites, where we provide our guests with information
regarding each of our Resorts, including services and amenities, reservations information, virtual tours and the opportunity to
book/purchase our full suite of products (e.g. lift access, lodging, ski and ride school, rentals, etc.) for their visits. We also enter
into strategic alliances with companies to enhance the guest experience at our Resorts, as well as to create opportunities for cross-
marketing.
For our Lodging segment, we promote our hotels and lodging properties through marketing and sales programs, which include
marketing directly to many of our guests through our digital channels (search, social and display), promotional programs, and
print media advertising, all of which are designed to drive traffic to our websites and central reservations call center. We also
promote comprehensive vacation experiences through various package offerings and promotions (combining lodging, lift tickets,
ski school lessons, ski rental equipment, transportation and dining). In addition, our hotels have active sales forces to generate
conference and group business. We market our resort properties in conjunction with our mountain resort marketing efforts where
appropriate, given the strong synergies across the two businesses.
Across both the Mountain and Lodging segments, sales made through our websites and call center allow us to transact directly
with our guests, which further expands our customer base and enables analytics to deliver an increasingly guest-centric
marketing experience.
Seasonality
Ski resort operations are highly seasonal in nature, with a typical ski season in North America generally beginning in mid-November
and running through mid-April. In an effort to partially mitigate the concentration of our revenue in the winter months in North
America, we offer several non-ski related activities in the summer months such as sightseeing, mountain biking, guided hiking,
4x4 Jeep tours, golf (included in the operations of the Lodging segment) and our Epic Discovery program. These activities also
help attract destination conference and group business to our Resorts in our off-season. In addition, the operating results of our
Australian Resorts, for which the ski season generally occurs from June through early October, partially counterbalances the
concentration of our revenues during this seasonally lower period in North America.
Our lodging business is also highly seasonal in nature, with peak seasons primarily in the winter months (with the exception of
GTLC, Flagg Ranch, certain managed properties and mountain resort golf operations). We actively promote our extensive
conference facilities and have added more off-season activities to help offset the seasonality of our lodging business. Additionally,
we operate several golf courses proximate to our Resorts, as described above.
13
Sustainability and Social Responsibility
Sustainability is a core philosophy for us. Our Resorts operate in some of the world’s greatest natural environments, and we are
compelled to care for and conserve them. Through our corporate social responsibility and sustainability program, Epic Promise,
we focus on resource conservation, forest health and building stronger local communities through contributions to local non-profit
organizations. Our sustainability efforts are diverse and touch nearly every area of our operations. In 2017, we launched our
Commitment to Zero, a pledge to have a zero net operating footprint by 2030. This commitment includes achieving zero net
emissions by finding operational energy efficiencies, investing in renewable energy and investing in offsets and other emissions
reduction projects, zero waste to landfills by diverting 100% of waste from our operations and zero net operating impact to forests
and habitat by restoring an acre of forest for every acre displaced by our operations.
As a result of this commitment, Vail Resorts was accepted as the first travel and tourism company into RE100, a collaborative
initiative uniting more than 100 global and influential businesses which are committed to 100% renewable electricity. During
Fiscal 2020, we made significant progress toward our Commitment to Zero goals. Specifically, we reached our interim goal of
achieving 50% waste diversion across the enterprise through waste reduction efforts as well as developing robust composting and
recycling diversion programs. We also enabled the new 82-turbine Plum Creek Wind project to come online and committed to
purchase 310,000 megawatt hours (MWh) of wind energy annually. This amount of wind power will address more than 90% of
the Company’s current electricity use across its 34 North American destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas.
In addition, during Fiscal 2020, we sponsored the reforestation of 39 acres in the Gunnison National Forest in Colorado that had
been damaged by bark beetle, which effort addressed 100% of the forests impacted by our operations over the year. Through direct
Epic Promise grants and contributions from our $1 guest donation program, we partner with several local environmental
organizations to fund restoration projects, including the National Forest Foundation, The Tahoe Fund, Grand Teton National Park
Foundation, Mountain Trails Foundation in Park City and the EnviroFund at Whistler Blackcomb. We encourage our employees
to help protect the environment and support their local community, with over 20,000 volunteer hours donated annually on average.
Our Epic Promise community investment grant program focuses support on local programs addressing marginalized youth and
critical community needs. During Fiscal 2020, we hosted more than 5,000 youth across our resorts through multi-day programs
focused on mentorship, leadership and the impact of outdoor time on mental health. Finally, our EpicPromise Employee Foundation
(the “Foundation”), which was established in 2015, is a charitable foundation funded by annual contributions from the Company,
its employees and its guests. The Foundation supports Vail Resorts’ employees and their families via grants for emergency relief
and scholarships. Annually more than $1 million in grants and scholarships are provided to help employees in times of need or to
pursue educational opportunities. For more information on both the Foundation and our environmental stewardship, visit
www.EpicPromise.com. Information on our websites does not constitute part of this document.
Employees
At fiscal year end, we employed approximately 7,100 year-round employees, including furloughed employees. During the height
of our most recent operating seasons (prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic for our North American winter operations),
we employed approximately 36,100 additional seasonal employees. In addition, we employed approximately 200 year-round
employees and 100 seasonal employees on behalf of the owners of our managed hotel properties. We consider our employee
relations to be good.
Intellectual Property
The development of intellectual property is part of our overall business strategy, and we regard our intellectual property as an
important element of our success. Accordingly, we protect our intellectual property rights and seek to protect against its unauthorized
use through international, national and state laws and common law rights. We file applications for and obtain trademark registrations
and have filed for patents to protect inventions and will continue to do so where appropriate. We also seek to maintain our trade
secrets and confidential information by nondisclosure policies and through the use of appropriate confidentiality agreements and
contractual provisions.
In the highly competitive industry in which we operate, trademarks, service marks, trade names and logos are very important in
the sales and marketing of our mountain resorts and urban ski areas, lodging properties and services. We seek to register and protect
our trademarks, service marks, trade names and logos and have obtained a significant number of registrations for those trademarks.
We believe our brands have become synonymous in the travel and leisure industry with a reputation for excellence in service and
authentic hospitality. Among other national and international trademark registrations, the Company owns U.S. federal registrations
for Epic®, Epic Pass®, Vail Resorts®, Vail®, Beaver Creek®, Breckenridge®, Keystone® and Heavenly®. The Company also owns
Canadian and U.S. trademark registrations for the Whistler Blackcomb® name and logo. The Company licenses the right to use
the federally registered trademark Northstar California® from CLP Northstar, LLC.
14
Environmental Compliance and other Laws and Regulations
Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the environment including laws and regulations
governing water and sewer discharges, water use, air emissions, soil and groundwater contamination, the maintenance of
underground and aboveground storage tanks, and the disposal of waste and hazardous materials. Examples of such laws and
regulations in the U.S. include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act, and the
Vermont Land Use and Development Act. Internationally, we are subject to the Forest and Range Practices Act and Watershed
Sustainability Act in British Columbia as well as the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW, Australia) and the
Environment Protection Act 1970 and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Victoria, Australia).
Various federal, state, local and provincial regulations also govern our resort operations, including liquor licensing and food safety
regulations applicable to our food and beverage operations and safety standards relating to our lift operations and heli-ski operations
at Whistler Blackcomb. In addition, each resort is subject to and must comply with state, county, regional and local government
land use regulations and restrictions, including, for example, employee housing ordinances, zoning and density restrictions, noise
ordinances, and wildlife, water and air quality regulations. We believe that we are in compliance, in all material respects, with
environmental and other laws and regulations. Compliance with such provisions has not materially impacted our capital
expenditures, earnings, or competitive position, and we do not anticipate that it will have a material impact in the future.
Contracts with Governmental Authorities for Resort Operations
U.S. Forest Service Resorts
The operations of Breckenridge, Vail Mountain, Keystone, Crested Butte, Stevens Pass, Heavenly, Kirkwood, Mount Snow, Attitash
and portions of Beaver Creek and Wildcat are conducted on land under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Forest Service (collectively,
the “Forest Service Resorts”). The 1986 Ski Area Permit Act (the “1986 Act”) allows the Forest Service to grant Term Special
Use Permits (each, a “SUP”) for the operation of ski areas and construction of related facilities on National Forest lands. In
November 2011, the 1986 Act was amended by the Ski Area Recreational Opportunity Enhancement Act (the “Enhancement Act”)
to clarify the Forest Service’s authority to approve facilities primarily for year-round recreation. Under the 1986 Act, the Forest
Service has the authority to review and approve the location, design and construction of improvements in the permit area and
many operational matters.
Each individual national forest is required by the National Forest Management Act to develop and maintain a Land and Resource
Management Plan (a “Forest Plan”), which establishes standards and guidelines for the Forest Service to follow and consider in
reviewing and approving our proposed actions.
Each of the Forest Service Resorts operates under a SUP, and the acreage and expiration date information for each SUP is as
follows:
Forest Service Resort
Breckenridge
Vail Mountain
Keystone
Beaver Creek
Heavenly
Mount Snow
Attitash
Wildcat
Kirkwood
Stevens Pass
Crested Butte
Acres
5,702
12,353
8,376
3,849
7,050
894
279
953
2,330
2,443
4,350
Expiration Date
December 31, 2029
December 1, 2031
December 31, 2032
November 8, 2039
May 1, 2042
April 4, 2047
April 4, 2047
November 18, 2050
March 1, 2052
August 15, 2058
September 27, 2058
We anticipate requesting a new SUP for each Forest Service Resort prior to its expiration date as provided by Forest Service
regulations and the terms of each existing SUP. We are not aware of the Forest Service refusing to issue a new SUP to replace an
expiring SUP for a ski resort in operation at the time of expiration. The Forest Service can also terminate a SUP if it determines
that termination is required in the public interest. However, to our knowledge, no SUP has ever been terminated by the Forest
Service over the opposition of the permit holder.
15
Each SUP contains a number of requirements, including indemnifying the Forest Service from third-party claims arising out of
our operation under the SUP and compliance with applicable laws, such as those relating to water quality and endangered or
threatened species. For use of the land authorized by the SUPs, we pay a fee to the Forest Service ranging from 1.5% to 4.0% of
adjusted gross revenue for activities authorized by the SUPs. Included in the calculation are sales from, among other things, lift
tickets, season passes, ski school lessons, food and beverage, certain summer activities, equipment rentals and retail merchandise.
The SUPs may be revised or amended to accommodate changes initiated by us or by the Forest Service to change the permit area
or permitted uses. The Forest Service may amend a SUP if it determines that such amendment is in the public interest. While the
Forest Service is required to seek the permit holder’s consent to any amendment, an amendment can be finalized over a permit
holder’s objection. Permit amendments must be consistent with the Forest Plan and are subject to the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), both of which are discussed below.
The 1986 Act requires a Master Development Plan (“MDP”) for each ski area that is granted a SUP, and all improvements that
we propose to make on National Forest System lands under any of our SUPs must be included in a MDP, which describes the
existing and proposed facilities, developments and area of activity within the permit area. The MDPs are reviewed by the Forest
Service for compliance with the Forest Plan and other applicable laws and, if found to be compliant, are accepted by the Forest
Service. Notwithstanding acceptance by the Forest Service of the conceptual MDPs, individual projects still require separate
applications and compliance with NEPA and other applicable laws before the Forest Service will approve such projects. We update
or amend our MDPs for our Forest Service Resorts from time to time.
Whistler Blackcomb
Whistler Blackcomb is comprised of two mountains: Whistler Mountain and Blackcomb Mountain. Whistler Mountain and
Blackcomb Mountain are located on Crown Land within the traditional territory of the Squamish and Lil’wat Nations. The
relationship between Whistler Blackcomb and Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of British Columbia (the “Province”) is largely
governed by Master Development Agreements (the “MDAs”) between the Province and Whistler Mountain Resort Limited
Partnership (“Whistler LP”) with respect to Whistler Mountain, and between the Province and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises
Limited Partnership (“Blackcomb LP”) with respect to Blackcomb Mountain. Together, Whistler LP and Blackcomb LP are referred
to as the “Partnerships.”
The MDAs, which were entered into in February 2017, have a term of 60 years (expiring on February 23, 2077) and are replaceable
for an additional 60 years by option exercisable by the Partnerships after the first 30 years of the initial term. In accordance with
the MDAs, the Partnerships are obligated to pay annual fees to the Province at a percentage of gross revenues related to the
operation of certain activities at Whistler Blackcomb.
The MDAs require that each of the mountains be developed, operated and maintained in accordance with its respective master
plan, which contains requirements as to matters such as trail design and development, passenger lift development and environmental
concerns. The MDAs grant a general license to use the Whistler Mountain lands and the Blackcomb Mountain lands for the
operation and development of Whistler Blackcomb. The MDAs also provide for the granting of specific tenures of land owned
by the Province to the Whistler LP or the Blackcomb LP, as applicable, by way of rights-of-way, leases or licenses. Each Partnership
is permitted to develop new improvements to Whistler Mountain or Blackcomb Mountain, as the case may be, within standard
municipal type development control conditions. We are obligated to indemnify the Province from third-party claims arising out
of our operations under the MDAs.
16
Northeast Resorts
Stowe and Okemo operate partially on land that we own and partially on land we lease from the State of Vermont. With respect
to Stowe, the land we own is on the Spruce Peak side of the resort while the land we lease from the State of Vermont is located
on Mt. Mansfield in the Mt. Mansfield State Forest. The initial ten year term of the lease commenced in June 1967, and the lease
provides for eight separate ten year extension options. The current term of the lease extends through June 2027, and there are three
remaining ten year extension options. With respect to Okemo, we own the Jackson Gore base area land and lease most of the
skiable terrain from the State of Vermont. The initial ten year term of the lease commenced in December 1963, and the lease
provides for eight separate ten year extension options. The current term of the lease extends through December 2023, and there
are three remaining ten year extension options. Under both leases, the land can be used for the development and operation of a
ski area including ski trails, ski lifts, warming shelters, restaurants and maintenance facilities. For use of the land under the leases,
we pay a fee to the State of Vermont based on revenue for activities authorized by the lease, such as lift tickets, season passes,
food and beverage, summer activities and retail merchandise. We are obligated to indemnify the State of Vermont from third-party
claims arising out of our operations under the lease.
Mount Sunapee lies within the Mount Sunapee State Park and operates on land that we lease from the State of New Hampshire.
The initial twenty year term of the lease commenced in July 1998, and the lease provides for three separate ten year extension
options. The current term of the lease extends through June 2028, and there are two remaining ten year extension options. The
land can be managed and operated as a ski area and summer recreational facility, including all of its support activities, to provide
year-round outdoor recreation. For use of the land under the lease, we pay a fee to the State of New Hampshire that includes both
a base fee and a fee based on revenue from activities authorized by the lease, such as lift tickets, season passes, food and beverage,
summer activities and retail merchandise. We are obligated to indemnify the State of New Hampshire from third-party claims
arising out of our operations under the lease.
Australian Resorts
Perisher is located in the Kosciuszko National Park, the largest national park in New South Wales, Australia. The resort includes
four villages (Perisher Valley, Smiggin Holes, Guthega and Blue Cow) and their associated ski fields, as well as the site of the
Skitube Alpine Railway at Bullock’s Flat, which is accredited in accordance with the Rail Safety National Law (NSW) No. 82a.
The Office of Environment and Heritage (“OEH”), an agency of the New South Wales government, which is part of the Department
of Planning and Environment, is responsible for the protection and conservation of the Kosciuszko National Park. The National
Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) (“NPW Act”) establishes the National Parks and Wildlife Service and is responsible for the
control and management of the Kosciusko National Park.
The NPW Act requires the Kosciuszko National Park to be managed in accordance with the principles specified in that legislation,
including the provision for sustainable visitor or tourist use and enjoyment that is compatible with the conservation of the national
park’s natural and cultural values. The legislation also authorizes the Minister for the Environment and the Minister for Heritage
(the “Minister”) to grant leases and licenses of land within the Kosciuszko National Park for various purposes, including for
purposes related to sustainable visitor or tourist use and enjoyment. Under this power, the Minister has granted to Perisher a lease
and a license of specified land within the Kosciusko National Park until June 30, 2048, with an option to renew for an additional
period of 20 years. The Minister has also granted Perisher a lease of the parking lot at Perisher Valley that expires on December
31, 2025. Subject to certain conditions being met, the lease for the Perisher Valley parking lot can be extended until June 30, 2048,
with an option to renew for a further 20 years. The lease and license provide for the payment of a minimum annual base rent with
periodic increases in base rent over the term, turnover rent payments based on a percentage of certain gross revenue, remittance
of park user fees and certain other charges, also subject to periodic increases over the term.
Falls Creek and Hotham are located in the Alpine National Park in Victoria, Australia. Falls Creek and Hotham both operate on
Crown land permanently reserved under the Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978 (Vic), with the exception of three small parcels of
freehold land within the Hotham resort area. Each resort is subject to the Alpine Resorts (Management) Act 1997 (Vic) (the “ARM
Act”), which is in place to manage the development, promotion, management and use of the resorts on a sustainable basis and in
a manner that is compatible with the alpine environment. The ARM Act established the Alpine Resorts Commission to plan for
the direction and sustainable growth of Victoria’s five alpine resorts (including Falls Creek and Hotham). This includes review
and coordination of the implementation of an Alpine Resorts Strategic Plan to which Falls Creek and Hotham are subject.
The ARM Act also established each of the Falls Creek Resort Management Board and Hotham Resort Management Board (the
“RMBs”), each of which is appointed by, and responsible to, the Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change (the
“Minister”). The RMBs are responsible for the management and collection of fees for entrance into the Alpine National Park and
from Falls Creek and Hotham ski resorts. The ARM Act authorizes the RMBs to grant leases subject to Ministerial approval, and
under this power, the entities operating the Hotham and Falls Creek resorts have each been leased land within the Alpine National
Park under various long-term leases with differing expiration dates. The main lease for the ski field at Falls Creek expires December
17
31, 2040, while the main lease for the ski field at Hotham expires December 31, 2057. The key ski field leases provide for the
payment of rent with both a fixed and variable component, a community service charge payable to the ARCC and a ski patrol
contribution payable to RMBs. At Hotham, we also lease land known as ‘Dinner Plain’ within the Alpine National Park which
expires on June 30, 2031, with an option to extend for a further 10 years.
The Alpine Resorts (Management) Regulations 2009 (Vic) gives the RMBs the power to declare the snow season, temporarily
close the resort to entry if there is a significant danger to public safety, determine parts of a resort to which entry is prohibited, set
aside areas of the resort for public use, parking, driving of vehicles, or landing of aircraft, and determine the areas for cross country
ski trails, skiing, snowboarding and other snow play activities.
Concessionaire Agreements
GTLC operates three lodging properties, food and beverage services, retail, camping and other services within the Grand Teton
National Park under a concessionaire agreement with the NPS. Our concessionaire agreement with the NPS for GTLC expires on
December 31, 2021, and we pay a fee to the NPS of a percentage of the majority of our sales occurring in Grand Teton National
Park.
Flagg Ranch Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, provides lodging, food and beverage services, retail, service station, recreation
and other services on the Parkway located between Grand Teton National Park and Yellowstone National Park. Our concession
contract with the NPS for the Parkway expires on October 31, 2026, and we pay a fee to the NPS of a percentage of the majority
of our sales occurring in the Parkway.
Prior to expiration of these concession contracts, we will have the opportunity to bid against other prospective concessionaires
for award of a new contract. The NPS may suspend operations under the concession contract at any time if the NPS determines
it is necessary to protect visitors or resources within the Grand Teton National Park or during a Federal Government shutdown.
The NPS may also terminate the concession contract for breach, following notice and a 15 day cure period or if it believes
termination is necessary to protect visitors or resources within the Grand Teton National Park.
Available Information
We file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports, including our annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These reports, proxy statements and other information
are available free of charge on our corporate website www.vailresorts.com as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our websites does not constitute part of this document. Materials
filed with or furnished to the SEC are also made available on its website at www.sec.gov. Copies of any materials we file with the
SEC can be obtained at www.sec.gov or at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information on the operation of the public reference room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows. The risks described below should carefully be considered together with the other information
contained in this report.
Risks Related to Our Business
The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has had, and is expected to continue to have, a significant
negative impact on our financial condition and operations. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has caused
severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business
continuity issues of an as yet unknown magnitude and duration. Any future outbreak of any other highly infectious or
contagious disease could have a similar impact.
Governmental authorities nationally and in affected regions have taken and continue to take dramatic actions by mandating various
restrictions in an effort to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), including travel restrictions, restrictions on public
gatherings, “shelter at home’’ orders and advisories and quarantining of people who may have been exposed to the virus. The
outbreak of COVID-19 has severely impacted global economic activity and caused significant volatility and negative pressure in
financial markets. Many experts predict that the outbreak will trigger a period of material global economic slowdown or a global
recession, with particular risk to the travel and leisure industry, which is disproportionately impacted by travel restrictions and
other public health restrictions.
18
In response to the continued challenges associated with the spread of COVID-19, we closed all of our North American mountain
resorts, retail/rental stores and lodging properties early for the 2019/2020 North American ski season in March 2020. Additionally,
although our Hotham and Falls Creek resorts opened for their winter season on July 6, 2020, we closed such resorts four days
later due to a “stay at home” order put in place by the Victorian government as a result of a reemergence of COVID-19 in the
region. The outbreak of COVID-19 has disrupted our business and has had and is expected to continue to have a significant negative
impact on our business, financial performance and condition, operating results, liquidity and cash flows. Factors that would
negatively impact our ability to successfully operate during the current outbreak of COVID-19 or another pandemic include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to open our North American Resorts for their winter season in a timely manner, if at all, and keep such Resorts
open;
our ability to attract and retain guests given the risks, or perceived risks, of gathering in public places;
the willingness of guests to travel or purchase advanced commitment products, such as our portfolio of season pass
products;
existing or future restrictions imposed by governmental authorities that may restrict our operations or the ability of our
guests to return to our Resorts;
actual or perceived deterioration or weakness in economic conditions, unemployment levels, the job or housing markets,
consumer debt levels or consumer confidence, as well as other adverse economic or market conditions due to COVID-19
or otherwise, and their collective impacts on demand for travel and leisure;
our ability to adjust capital spending and maintain sufficient liquidity to remain positioned for long-term success;
our ability to incentivize and retain our current employees, reinstate our furloughed employees as we reopen, attract and
hire sufficient future seasonal employees, and the risk of lawsuits related to COVID-19;
our ability to access debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all; and
the impact of disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions
on our access to capital necessary to fund operating costs, including maintenance capital spending, or to address maturing
liabilities.
The extent and duration of the impact of the outbreak of COVID-19 on our business, consolidated results of operations, consolidated
financial position and consolidated cash flows, will depend largely on future developments, including the duration and spread of
the outbreak within the U.S., the related impact on factors affecting guest behavior, including consumer confidence and spending
and when we will be able to resume normal operations, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. In April 2020
we introduced Epic Coverage for the 2020/2021 North American ski season, which provides refunds to all pass holders in the
event of certain resort closures (including closures due to COVID-19) for any portion of the season that is not able to be utilized.
Accordingly, to the extent that any of our Resorts would need to be closed for all or any portion of the 2020/2021 North American
ski season (whether due to COVID-19 or otherwise), we could be required to provide a significant amount of refunds to our
customers, which could have a material negative impact on our financial performance and condition.
We may be required to raise additional capital in the future and our access to and cost of financing will depend on, among other
things, global economic conditions, conditions in the global financing markets, the availability of sufficient amounts of financing,
our prospects and our credit ratings. The terms of future debt agreements could include more restrictive covenants, or require
incremental collateral, which may further restrict our business operations. There is no guarantee that debt financings will be
available in the future to fund our obligations, or that they will be available on terms consistent with our expectations. In addition,
because of reduced travel demand, certain of our leased properties may not generate revenue sufficient to meet operating expenses.
COVID-19 presents material uncertainty and risk with respect to our business, financial performance and condition, operating
results, liquidity and cash flows. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it
may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in the Risk Factors presented in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, and our subsequent filings with the SEC. Any future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious disease
could have a similar impact.
19
Leisure travel is particularly susceptible to various factors outside of our control, including terrorism, the uncertainty of
military conflicts, the cost and availability of travel options and changing consumer preferences or willingness to travel.
Our business is sensitive to the willingness of our guests to travel. Acts of terrorism, political events and developments in military
conflicts in areas of the world from which we draw our guests could depress the public’s propensity to travel and cause severe
disruptions in both domestic and international air travel and consumer discretionary spending, which could reduce the number of
visitors to our resorts and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Many of our guests travel by air and the impact of
higher prices for commercial airline services, availability of air services and willingness of guests to travel by air could cause a
decrease in visitation by Destination guests to our resorts. A significant portion of our guests also travel by vehicle and higher
gasoline prices or willingness of guests to travel generally due to safety concerns could cause a decrease in visitation by guests
who would typically drive to our resorts. Higher cost of travel may also affect the amount that guests are willing to spend at our
resorts and could negatively impact our revenue particularly for lodging, ski school, dining and retail/rental.
Additionally, our success depends on our ability to attract visitors to our ski resorts. Changes in consumer tastes and preferences,
particularly those affecting the popularity of skiing and snowboarding, and other social and demographic trends could adversely
affect the number of skier visits during a ski season. A significant decline in skier visits compared to historical levels would have
a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We are subject to the risk of prolonged weakness in general economic conditions including adverse effects on the overall
travel and leisure related industries.
Skiing, travel and tourism are discretionary recreational activities that can entail a relatively high cost of participation and may
be adversely affected by economic slowdown or recession. Economic conditions in North America, Europe and parts of the rest
of the world, including high unemployment, erosion of consumer confidence, sovereign debt issues and financial instability in the
global markets, may potentially have negative effects on the travel and leisure industry and on our results of operations. See “Risks
Related to Our Business—The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has had, and is expected to continue to
have, a significant negative impact on our financial condition and operations. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has
caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business
continuity issues of an as yet unknown magnitude and duration.” As a result of these and other economic uncertainties, we are
experiencing and may continue to experience in the future, a change in booking trends including where guest reservations are
made much closer to the actual date of stay, a decrease in the length of stay, a decrease in consumer spending and/or a decrease
in group bookings. We cannot predict what further impact these uncertainties may continue to have on overall travel and leisure
or more specifically, on our guest visitation, guest spending or other related trends and the ultimate impact it will have on our
results of operations. Additionally, the actual or perceived fear of weakness in the economy could also lead to decreased spending
by our guests. This could be further exacerbated by the fact that we charge some of the highest prices for single day lift tickets
and ancillary services in the ski industry; however, we offer pass products, including the Epic Day Pass, that are available at a
discount to the single day lift tickets. In the event of a decrease in visitation and overall guest spending we may be required to
offer a higher amount of discounts and incentives than we have historically, which would adversely impact our operating results.
Our resorts also serve as a destination for international guests. To the extent there are material changes in exchange rates relative
to the U.S. dollar or travel restrictions in place due to COVID-19, it could impact the volume of international visitation, which
could have a significant impact on our operating results.
20
We are vulnerable to unfavorable weather conditions and the impact of natural disasters.
Our ability to attract guests to our resorts is influenced by weather conditions and by the amount and timing of snowfall during
the ski season. Unfavorable weather conditions can adversely affect skier visits and our revenue and profits. Unseasonably warm
weather may result in inadequate natural snowfall and reduce skiable terrain, which increases the cost of snowmaking and could
render snowmaking, wholly or partially, ineffective in maintaining quality skiing conditions, including in areas which are not
accessible by snowmaking equipment. On the other hand, excessive natural snowfall may significantly increase the costs incurred
to groom trails and may make it difficult for guests to access our mountain resorts. In the past 20 years, our resorts in the Rocky
Mountain region of Colorado and Utah, the Sierra Nevada Mountains in Lake Tahoe and the Coast Mountains in British Columbia,
Canada have averaged between 20 and 39 feet of annual snowfall, which is significantly in excess of the average for North American
ski resorts. However, there can be no assurance that our resorts will receive seasonal snowfalls near their historical average in the
future. As an example of weather variability, during the 2017/2018 North American ski season, we experienced historically low
snowfall across our western U.S. resorts for the first half of the ski season, with snowfall in Vail, Beaver Creek and Park City through
January 31, 2018 at the lowest levels recorded in over 30 years while Tahoe was more than 50% below the 20-year average.
Additionally, during the 2018/2019 North American ski season, our western U.S. resorts experienced above-average snowfall
while through December 31, 2019, our Pacific Northwest resorts (Whistler Blackcomb and Stevens Pass) experienced the lowest
snowfall in over 30 years. Past snowfall levels or consistency of snow conditions can impact sales of pass products or other
advanced bookings. Additionally, the early season snow conditions and skier perceptions of early season snow conditions can
influence the momentum and success of the overall ski season. Unfavorable weather conditions can adversely affect our resorts
and lodging properties as guests tend to delay or postpone vacations if conditions differ from those that are typical at such resorts
for a given season. Although we have created geographic diversification to help mitigate the impact of weather variability, there
is no way for us to predict future weather patterns or the impact that weather patterns may have on our results of operations or
visitation.
A severe natural disaster, such as a forest fire, may interrupt our operations, damage our properties, reduce the number of guests
who visit our resorts in affected areas and negatively impact our revenue and profitability. Damage to our properties could take a
long time to repair and there is no guarantee that we would have adequate insurance to cover the costs of repair and recoup lost
profits. Furthermore, such a disaster may interrupt or impede access to our affected properties or require evacuations and may
cause visits to our affected properties to decrease for an indefinite period. The ability to attract visitors to our resorts is also
influenced by the aesthetics and natural beauty of the outdoor environment where our resorts are located. A severe forest fire or
other severe impacts from naturally occurring events could negatively impact the natural beauty of our resorts and have a long-
term negative impact on our overall guest visitation as it would take several years for the environment to recover.
Additionally, there is scientific research that emissions of greenhouse gases continue to alter the composition of the global
atmosphere in ways that are affecting and are expected to continue affecting the global climate. The effect of climate change,
including any impact of global warming, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations as a result of increased
weather variability and/or warmer overall temperatures, which would likely adversely affect skier visits and our revenue and
profits.
Failure to maintain the integrity and security of our internal, employee or guest data could result in damages to our
reputation and subject us to costs, fines or lawsuits.
Our business relies on the use of large volumes of data. We collect and retain guest data, including credit card numbers and other
sensitive personal information, for various business purposes, such as processing transactions, marketing and other promotional
purposes. We also maintain personal information about our employees. We store and use data in a variety of information systems,
including some systems maintained by service providers. Maintaining the integrity and security of that data can be costly and is
critical to our business, and our guests and employees have a high expectation that we will adequately protect their personal
information. We could make faulty decisions if that data is inaccurate or incomplete. A significant theft, loss, loss of access to, or
fraudulent use of customer, employee, or company data could adversely impact our reputation, and could result in significant
remedial and other expenses, fines, and/or litigation.
Cyberattacks could disrupt our business.
Despite our efforts, information networks and systems are vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from
inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. In recent years, there
has been a rise in the number of sophisticated cyberattacks on network and information systems, and as a result, the risks associated
with such an event continue to increase. We have experienced cybersecurity threats and incidents, none of which has been material
to us to date. We have taken, and continue to take, steps to address these concerns by implementing security and internal controls.
However, there can be no assurance that a system interruption, security breach or unauthorized access will not occur. Cyber threats
and attacks are constantly evolving and becoming more sophisticated, which increases the difficulty and cost of detecting and
21
defending against them. Cyber threats and attacks can have cascading impacts across networks, systems and operations. Those
events may include process breakdowns, security architecture or design vulnerabilities, or may result from the acts of third parties,
such as computer hackings, cyber-attacks, computer viruses, worms or other destructive or disruptive software, denial of service
attacks, malicious social engineering or other malicious activities. Any such interruption, breach or unauthorized access to our
network or systems, or the networks or systems of our vendors, could adversely affect our business operations and result in the
loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, as well as impact our ability to meet regulatory or
compliance obligations, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. These events also could result
in large expenditures to repair or replace the damaged properties, products, services, networks or information systems to protect
them from similar events in the future.
Our business is highly seasonal.
Our mountain and lodging operations are highly seasonal in nature. Peak operating season for our North American Resorts is from
late November to mid-April, and accordingly, revenue and profits from our mountain and most of our lodging operations are
substantially lower and historically result in losses from late spring to late fall. Conversely, peak operating seasons for our Australian
resorts, GTLC and Flagg Ranch, mountain summer activities (including our Epic Discovery program), sightseeing and our golf
courses generally occur from June to the end of September. Revenue and profits generated by our Australian resorts, GTLC and
Flagg Ranch, mountain summer activities/sightseeing and golf peak season operations are not nearly sufficient to fully offset our
off-season losses from our other mountain and lodging operations. For Fiscal 2020, approximately 83% of total combined Mountain
and Lodging segment net revenue (excluding Lodging segment revenue associated with reimbursement of payroll costs) was
earned during our second and third fiscal quarters. This seasonality is partially mitigated by the sale of pass products (which for
Fiscal 2020 accounted for approximately 51% of the total lift revenue) predominately occurring during the period prior to the start
of the ski season as the cash from those sales is collected in advance and revenue is mostly recognized in the second and third
quarters. In addition, the timing of major holidays and school breaks can impact vacation patterns and therefore visitation at our
mountain resorts and urban ski areas. If we were to experience an adverse event or realize a significant deterioration in our operating
results during our peak periods (our fiscal second and third quarters) we would be unable to fully recover any significant declines
due to the seasonality of our business (for example, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a premature closure
to our 2019/2020 North American ski season in March 2020. See “Risks Related to Our Business—The current outbreak of the
novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has had, and is expected to continue to have, a significant negative impact on our financial
condition and operations. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global
economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business continuity issues of an as yet unknown magnitude
and duration.”). Operating results for any three-month period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for
any subsequent quarter or for a full fiscal year (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
The Forest Service authorized year-round recreational activities, which allows our mountain resorts on Forest Service land to offer
more summer-season recreational opportunities, including our Epic Discovery program that we launched at Heavenly, Vail and
Breckenridge. We anticipate that as these summer activities mature, and with Whistler Blackcomb’s robust summer activities and
the activities at our other resorts, we could realize incremental summer guest visitation and revenue. However, our summer activities
may not generate the projected revenue and profit margins we expect, and even if our future plans are successful, we do not expect
that these enhanced summer operations will fully mitigate the seasonal losses that our mountain operations experience from late
spring to late fall.
We face significant competition.
The ski resort and lodging industries are highly competitive. During the 2018/2019 North American ski season (the ski season
immediately prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic), combined skier visits for all ski areas in North America were
approximately 79.7 million. There are approximately 770 ski areas in North America, including approximately 475 in the U.S.
that serve local and destination guests, and these ski areas can be more or less impacted by weather conditions based on their
location and snowmaking capabilities. The factors that we believe are important to customers include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
proximity to population centers;
availability and cost of transportation to ski areas;
availability and quality of lodging options in resort areas;
ease of travel to ski areas (including direct flights by major airlines);
pricing of lift tickets and/or pass products and the magnitude, quality and price of related ancillary services (ski
school, dining and retail/rental), amenities and lodging;
snowmaking facilities;
type and quality of skiing and snowboarding offered;
duration of the ski season;
weather conditions; and
22
•
reputation.
There are many competing options for our guests, including other major resorts in Colorado, Utah, California, Nevada, the Pacific
Northwest, Northeast, Southwest and British Columbia, Canada, and other major destination ski areas worldwide. Our guests can
choose from any of these alternatives, as well as non-skiing vacation options and destinations around the world. In addition, other
forms of leisure such as sporting events and participation in other competing indoor and outdoor recreational activities are available
to potential guests.
RockResorts hotels, our other hotels and our property management business compete with numerous other hotel and property
management companies that may have greater financial resources than we do and they may be able to adapt more quickly to
changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to promotion of their offerings than us.
The high fixed cost structure of mountain resort operations can result in significantly lower margins if revenues decline.
The cost structure of our mountain resort operations has a significant fixed component with variable expenses including, but not
limited to, land use permit or lease fees and other resort related fees; credit card fees; retail/rental cost of sales; labor; and resort,
dining and ski school operations. Any material declines in the economy, elevated geopolitical uncertainties and/or significant
changes in historical snowfall patterns, as well as other risk factors discussed herein, could adversely affect revenue. See “Risks
Related to Our Business—The current outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, has had, and is expected to continue to
have, a significant negative impact on our financial condition and operations. Further, the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak has
caused severe disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and financial markets and could potentially create widespread business
continuity issues of an as yet unknown magnitude and duration.” As such, our margins, profits and cash flows may be materially
reduced due to declines in revenue given our relatively high fixed cost structure. In addition, increases in wages and other labor
costs, energy, healthcare, insurance, transportation and fuel, property taxes, minimum lease payments and other expenses included
in our fixed cost structure may also reduce our margin, profits and cash flows.
We may not be able to fund resort capital expenditures.
We regularly expend capital to construct, maintain and renovate our mountain resorts and properties in order to remain competitive,
maintain the value and brand standards of our mountain resorts and properties and comply with applicable laws and regulations.
We cannot always predict where capital will need to be expended in a given fiscal year and capital expenditures can increase due
to forces beyond our control. In March 2020, we announced our full capital plan for calendar year 2020, pursuant to which we
anticipated we would spend approximately $210 million to $215 million, including one-time items associated with integrations,
the one-time Triple Peaks and Stevens Pass transformation plan, one-time Peak Resorts capital improvements, real estate related
capital and approximately $4 million of reimbursable investments. Excluding such one-time items, we expected to spend
approximately $155 million to $160 million on resort capital expenditures during calendar year 2020. On April 1, 2020, as part
of our response to the impacts of COVID-19 on our business, we announced a reduction to our capital plan for calendar year 2020
by approximately $80 million to $85 million, with the vast majority of these savings coming from the deferral of many of our
discretionary capital projects. We are planning to defer all new chair lifts, terrain expansions and other mountain and base area
improvements, while continuing with the vast majority of our maintenance capital spending.
Our ability to fund capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or to borrow
from third parties in the debt or equity markets. We cannot provide assurances that our operations will be able to generate sufficient
cash flow to fund such capital expenditures, or that we will be able to obtain sufficient financing on adequate terms, or at all. Our
ability to generate cash flow and to obtain third-party financing will depend upon many factors, including:
•
•
•
•
our future operating performance;
general economic conditions and economic conditions affecting the resort industry, the ski industry and the capital
markets;
competition; and
legislative and regulatory matters affecting our operations and business;
Any inability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or to obtain adequate third-party financing could cause us to delay
or abandon certain projects and/or plans.
23
A disruption in our water supply would impact our snowmaking capabilities and operations.
Our operations are heavily dependent upon our access to adequate supplies of water for snowmaking and to otherwise conduct
our operations. Our mountain resorts are subject to federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to water rights.
Changes in these laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations. In addition, a severe and prolonged drought may
adversely affect our water supply and increase the cost of snowmaking. A significant change in law or policy, impact from climate
change or any other interference with our access to adequate supplies of water to support our current operations or an expansion
of our operations would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We rely on various government permits and landlord approvals at our U.S. resorts.
Our U.S. resort operations require permits and approvals from certain federal, state and local authorities, including the Forest
Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the States of Vermont and New Hampshire and the NPS. Virtually all of our ski trails and
related activities, including our current and proposed comprehensive summer activities plan, at Vail Mountain, Breckenridge,
Keystone, Crested Butte, Stevens Pass, Heavenly, Kirkwood, Mount Snow, Wildcat, a majority of Beaver Creek and portions of
Attitash are located on National Forest land. The Forest Service has granted us permits to use these lands, but maintains the right
to review and approve many operational matters, as well as the location, design and construction of improvements in these areas.
Currently, our permits expire on the following dates:
Forest Service Resort
Expiration Date
Breckenridge
Vail Mountain
December 31, 2029
December 1, 2031
Keystone
December 31, 2032
Beaver Creek
November 8, 2039
Heavenly
Mount Snow
Attitash
Wildcat
Kirkwood
Stevens Pass
Crested Butte
May 1, 2042
April 4, 2047
April 4, 2047
November 18, 2050
March 1, 2052
August 15, 2058
September 27, 2058
The Forest Service can terminate or amend these permits if, in its opinion, such termination is required in the public interest. A
termination or amendment of any of our permits could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operations. In order
to undertake improvements and new development, we must apply for permits and other approvals. These efforts, if unsuccessful,
could impact our expansion efforts. Furthermore, Congress may materially increase the fees we pay to the Forest Service for use
of these National Forest lands. Stowe and Okemo are partially located on land we lease from the State of Vermont, and Mount
Sunapee is located on land we lease from the State of New Hampshire. We are required to seek approval from such states for
certain developments and improvements made to the resort. Certain other resorts are operated on land under long term leases with
third parties. For example, operations at our Northstar, Park City and Mad River Mountain resorts are conducted pursuant to long-
term leases with third parties who require us to operate the resorts in accordance with the terms of the leases and seek certain
approvals from the respective landlords for improvements made to the resorts. The initial lease term for Northstar with affiliates
of EPR Properties expires in January 2027 and allows for three 10-year renewal options. We entered into a transaction agreement,
master lease agreement and ancillary transaction documents with affiliate companies of Talisker Corporation (“Talisker”), and the
initial lease term for our Park City resort with Talisker expires in May 2063 and allows for six 50-year renewal options. Additionally,
GTLC and Flagg Ranch operate under concessionaire agreements with the NPS that expire on December 31, 2021 and October
31, 2026, respectively. There is no guarantee that at the end of the initial lease/license or agreements under which we operate our
resorts we will renew or, if desired, be able to negotiate new terms that are favorable to us. Additionally, our resorts that operate
on privately-owned land are subject to local land use regulation and oversight by county and/or town government and may not be
able to obtain the requisite approvals needed for resort improvements or expansions. Failure to comply with the provisions,
obligations and terms (including renewal requirements and deadlines) of our material permits and leases could adversely impact
our operating results.
24
We rely on foreign government leases and landlord approvals, and are subject to certain related laws and regulations, at
our international resorts.
Our international resort operations require permits and approvals from certain foreign authorities, including the Province of British
Columbia and the New South Wales and Victoria, Australia governments. Our operations at Whistler Blackcomb are located on
Crown Land within the traditional territory of the Squamish and Lil’wat Nations, and the operations and future development of
both Whistler Mountain and Blackcomb Mountain are governed by Master Development Agreements, which expire on February
23, 2077. We have a lease and a license for Perisher within the Kosciusko National Park which expires in June 2048, with an
option to renew for an additional period of 20 years. Perisher relies on a suite of planning approvals (and existing use rights)
granted under the Australian EPA Act to operate the resort. Strategic planning documents have been adopted to provide a framework
for the assessment and approval of future development at the resort. Perisher also holds a number of environmental approvals to
regulate its operations, including an environment protection license and a suite of dangerous goods licenses related to the storage
of diesel, heating oil and propane in storage tanks across the resort. Each of Falls Creek and a majority of Hotham is located in
the Alpine National Park in Victoria, Australia that is permanently reserved under the Crown Land Act and subject to the ARM
Act. The ARM Act established the Falls Creek RMB and the Hotham RMB, which is responsible for the management and collection
of fees from Falls Creek and Hotham, respectively, and the ARM Regulations give each of the Falls Creek RMB and the Hotham
RMB certain discretion over the operations of Falls Creek and Hotham, respectively, including the authority to (i) declare the
snow season, (ii) temporarily close the applicable resort if entry would be a significant danger to public safety, and (iii) determine
which portions of the applicable resort are open to the public and the activities that are permitted on those portions of such resort.
There is no guarantee that at the end of the initial lease/license or agreements under which we operate our resorts we will renew
or, if desired, be able to negotiate new terms that are favorable to us. Failure to comply with the provisions, obligations and terms
(including renewal requirements and deadlines) of our material permits and leases could adversely impact our operating results.
We are subject to extensive environmental and health and safety laws and regulations in the ordinary course of business.
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations including those
relating to air emissions, discharges to water, storage, treatment and disposal of wastes and other liquids, land use, remediation
of contaminated sites, protection of natural resources such as wetlands and sustainable visitor or tourist use and enjoyment. For
example, future expansions of certain of our mountain facilities must comply with applicable forest plans approved under the
National Forest Management Act, federal, state and foreign wildlife protection laws or local zoning requirements, and in Vermont,
our operations must comply with Act 250, which regulates the impacts of development to, among other things, waterways, air,
wildlife and earth resources, and any projects must be completed pursuant to a Master Plan. In addition, most projects to improve,
upgrade or expand our ski areas are subject to environmental review under the NEPA, FRPA, Act 250, the CEQA, the Australian
NPW Act, the Australian EPA Act or the Australian EP Act, as applicable. The NEPA and CEQA require the Forest Service, or
other governmental entities, to study any proposal for potential environmental impacts and include various alternatives in its
analysis. Our ski area improvement proposals may not be approved or may be approved with modifications that substantially
increase the cost or decrease the desirability of implementing the project. Our facilities are subject to risks associated with mold
and other indoor building contaminants. From time to time our operations are subject to inspections by environmental regulators
or other regulatory agencies. We are also subject to worker health and safety requirements as well as various state and local public
health laws, rules, regulations and orders related to COVID-19, including mask and social distancing requirements. We believe
our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable material environmental, health and safety requirements. However,
our efforts to comply do not eliminate the risk that we may be held liable, incur fines or be subject to claims for damages, and that
the amount of any liability, fines, damages or remediation costs may be material for, among other things, the presence or release
of regulated materials at, on or emanating from properties we now or formerly owned or operated, newly discovered environmental
impacts or contamination at or from any of our properties, or changes in environmental laws and regulations or their enforcement.
25
Changes in security and privacy laws and regulations could increase our operating costs, increase our exposure to fines
and litigation, and adversely affect our ability to market our products, properties and services effectively.
The information, security, and privacy requirements imposed by applicable laws and governmental regulation and the requirements
of the payment card industry are increasingly demanding in the U.S. and other jurisdictions where we operate. Maintaining
compliance with applicable security and privacy regulations may increase our operating costs or our exposure to potential fines
and litigation in connection with the enforcement of such regulations, or otherwise impact our ability to market our products,
properties and services to our guests. Any future changes or restrictions in U.S. or international privacy laws could also adversely
affect our operations, including our ability to transfer guest data. Additionally, we rely on a variety of direct marketing techniques,
including email marketing, online advertising, and postal mailings. Changes in U.S. or international law affecting marketing,
solicitation or privacy, could adversely affect our marketing activities and force changes in our marketing strategy or increase the
costs of marketing. We also obtain access to potential customers from travel service providers or other companies with whom we
have substantial relationships, and we market to some individuals on these lists directly or through other companies’ marketing
materials. If access to these lists was prohibited or otherwise restricted, our ability to develop new customers and introduce them
to our products could be impaired.
We rely on information technology to operate our businesses and maintain our competitiveness, and any failure to adapt
to technological developments or industry trends could harm our business or competitive position.
We depend on the use of sophisticated information technology and systems for central reservations, point of sale, marketing,
customer relationship management and communication, procurement, maintaining the privacy of guest and employee data,
administration and technologies we make available to our guests. We must continuously improve and upgrade our systems and
infrastructure to offer enhanced products, services, features and functionality, while maintaining the reliability and integrity of
our systems, network security and infrastructure. Our future success also depends on our ability to adapt our infrastructure to meet
rapidly evolving consumer trends and demands and to respond to competitive service and product offerings. In addition, we may
not be able to maintain our existing systems or replace or introduce new technologies and systems as quickly as we would like or
in a cost-effective manner. Delays or difficulties implementing new or enhanced systems may keep us from achieving the desired
results in a timely manner, to the extent anticipated, or at all. Any interruptions, outages or delays in our systems, or deterioration
in their performance, could impair our ability to process transactions and could decrease the quality of service we offer to our
guests. Also, we may be unable to devote adequate financial resources to new technologies and systems in the future. If any of
these events occur, our business and financial performance could suffer.
We may not be able to hire, train, reward and retain adequate team members and determine and maintain adequate
staffing, which may impact our ability to achieve our operating, growth and financial objectives.
Our long-term growth and profitability depend partially on our ability to recruit and retain high-quality employees to work in and
manage our resorts. Adequate staffing and retention of qualified employees is a critical factor affecting our guests’ experiences in
our resorts. Maintaining adequate staffing requires precise workforce planning which has been complicated and is unpredictable
due the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on guest preferences and on labor markets. The market for the most qualified talent
continues to be competitive and we must provide competitive wages, benefits and workplace conditions to attract and retain our
most qualified employees. Year round employees may seek other employment and seasonal employees may decline to return, to
be re-hired, or to be hired for the first time during this coming winter season. Personal or public health concerns related to COVID-19
might make some employees and potential candidates reluctant to work in enclosed environments such as our hotels, restaurants
and retail/rental stores. Resort-area housing could be even more limited than usual, making it difficult for employees to obtain
available, affordable housing. A shortage of international workers based on immigration and cultural exchange limitations currently
in place, failure to recruit and retain new domestic employees in a timely manner, or higher than expected attrition levels all could
affect our ability to open and operate parts of our resorts, deliver guest service at traditional margins or achieve our labor cost
objectives.
We depend on a seasonal workforce.
Our mountain and lodging operations are highly dependent on a large seasonal workforce. We recruit year-round to fill thousands
of seasonal staffing needs each season and work to manage seasonal wages and the timing of the hiring process to ensure the
appropriate workforce is in place. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to recruit and hire adequate seasonal
personnel as the business requires. Changes in immigration laws could also impact our workforce because we recruit and hire
foreign nationals as part of our seasonal workforce. For example, on June 22, 2020, an executive order was executed in the United
States suspending the issuance of several visas for foreign workers until at least the end of 2020. Increased seasonal wages or an
inadequate workforce could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
26
We are subject to risks associated with our workforce, including increased labor costs.
We are subject to various federal, state and foreign laws governing matters such as minimum wage requirements, sick leave pay,
overtime compensation and other working conditions, work authorization requirements, discrimination and family and medical
leave. Cost of labor and labor-related benefits are primary components in the cost of our operations. Labor shortages, affordable
employee housing shortages and increased employee turnover and health care mandates could also increase our labor costs and
labor-related benefits. As minimum wage rates increase, including further potential federal and state legislative changes to the
minimum wage rate, we may need to increase not only the wages of our minimum wage employees but also the wages paid to
employees at wage rates that are above the minimum wage. From time to time, we have also experienced non-union employees
attempting to unionize. While only a very small portion of our employees are unionized at present, we may experience additional
union activity in the future, which could lead to disruptions in our business, increases in our operating costs and/or constraints on
our operating flexibility. These potential labor impacts could adversely impact our results of operations.
If we do not retain our key personnel, our business may suffer.
The success of our business is heavily dependent on the leadership of key management personnel, including our senior executive
officers. If any of these persons were to leave, it could be difficult to replace them, and our business could be harmed. We do not
maintain “key-man” life insurance on any of our employees.
We are subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business.
We are, from time to time, subject to various asserted or unasserted legal proceedings and claims. Any such proceedings or claims,
regardless of merit, could be time consuming and expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention and resources.
While we believe we have adequate insurance coverage and/or accrue for loss contingencies for all known matters that are probable
and can be reasonably estimated, we cannot provide any assurance that the outcome of all current or future litigation proceedings
and claims will not have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Our business depends on the quality and reputation of our brands, and any deterioration in the quality or reputation of
these brands could have an adverse impact on our business.
A negative public image or other adverse events could affect the reputation of one or more of our mountain resorts, other destination
resorts, hotel properties and other businesses or more generally impact the reputation of our brands. Information posted on social
media platforms at any time may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our reputation or
business. Any resulting harm on our business may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. If
the reputation or perceived quality of our brands declines, our market share, reputation, business, financial condition or results of
operations could be adversely impacted. Additionally, our intellectual property, including our trademarks, domain names and other
proprietary rights, constitutes a significant part of our value. Any misappropriation, infringement or violation of our intellectual
property rights could also diminish the value of our brands and their market acceptance, competitive advantages or goodwill,
which could adversely affect our business.
There is a risk of accidents occurring at our mountain resorts or competing mountain resorts which may reduce visitation
and negatively impact our operations.
Our ability to attract and retain guests depends, in part, upon the external perceptions of the Company, the quality and safety of
our resorts, services and activities, including summer activities, and our corporate and management integrity. While we maintain
and promote an on-mountain safety program, there are inherent risks associated with our resort activities. From time to time in
the past, accidents and other injuries have occurred on Resort property. An accident or an injury at any of our resorts or at resorts
operated by competitors, particularly an accident or injury involving the safety of guests and employees that receives media
attention, could negatively impact our brand or reputation, cause loss of consumer confidence in us, reduce visitation at our resorts,
and negatively impact our results of operations. The considerable expansion in the use of social media over recent years has
compounded the impact of negative publicity. If any such incident occurs during a time of high seasonal demand, the effect could
disproportionately impact our results of operations.
27
Our acquisitions might not be successful.
We have completed numerous acquisitions, including most recently Peak Resorts, Hotham and Falls Creek, and may continue to
acquire certain mountain resorts, hotel properties and other businesses complementary to our own, as well as developable land in
proximity to our resorts. Acquisitions are complex to evaluate, execute and integrate. We cannot ensure that we will be able to
accurately evaluate or successfully integrate and manage acquired mountain resorts, properties and businesses and increase our
profits from these operations. We continually evaluate potential acquisitions both domestically and internationally and intend to
actively pursue acquisition opportunities, some of which could be significant. As a result, we face various risks from acquisitions,
including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our evaluation of the synergies and/or long-term benefits of an acquired business;
our inability to integrate acquired businesses into our operations as planned;
diversion of our management’s attention;
increased expenditures (including legal, accounting and due diligence expenses, higher administrative costs to
support the acquired entities, information technology, personnel and other integration expenses);
potential increased debt leverage;
potential issuance of dilutive equity securities;
litigation arising from acquisition activity;
potential impairment of goodwill, intangible or tangible assets; and
unanticipated problems or liabilities.
In addition, we run the risk that any new acquisitions may fail to perform in accordance with expectations, and that estimates of
the costs of improvements and integration for such properties may prove inaccurate.
We have recently acquired companies that were not subject to rules and regulations promulgated under the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), and, therefore, they may lack the internal controls of a U.S. public
company, which could ultimately affect our ability to ensure compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-
Oxley.
We have recently acquired companies that were not previously subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under Sarbanes-
Oxley and accordingly were not required to establish and maintain an internal control infrastructure meeting the standards
promulgated under Sarbanes-Oxley. Our assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of July 31, 2020 did not include certain elements of the internal controls of Peak Resorts, which was acquired during
our fiscal year ended July 31, 2020.
Although our management will continue to review and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls in light of these
acquisitions, we cannot provide any assurances that there will be no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal
control over financial reporting. Any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the internal control structure of our acquired
businesses may cause significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Our international operations subject us to additional risks.
As a result of the acquisitions of Whistler Blackcomb in Canada and Perisher, Hotham and Falls Creek in Australia, and potential
future international acquisitions, we have and may continue to increase our operations outside of the United States. We are
accordingly subject to a number of risks relating to doing business internationally, any of which could significantly harm our
business. These risks include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
restriction on the transfer of funds to and from foreign countries, including potentially negative tax consequences;
currency exchange rates;
increased exposure to general market and economic conditions outside the United States;
additional political risk;
compliance with international laws and regulations (including anti-corruption regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act);
data security; and
foreign tax treaties and policies.
28
Exchange rate fluctuations could result in significant foreign currency gains and losses and affect our business results.
We are exposed to currency translation risk because the results of Whistler Blackcomb, Perisher, Hotham and Falls Creek are
reported in their local currencies, which we then translate to U.S. dollars for inclusion in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates, in particular between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and the U.S. dollar,
affect the amounts we record for our foreign assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and could have a negative effect on our
financial results. We currently do not enter into hedging arrangements to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
We expect that our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will increase as our international operations grow and
if we acquire additional international resorts.
We are subject to accounting and tax regulations and use certain estimates and judgments that may differ significantly
from actual results, including adverse determinations by tax authorities.
Implementation of existing and future legislation, rulings, standards and interpretations from the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) or other regulatory bodies could affect the presentation of our financial statements and related disclosures. Future
regulatory requirements could significantly change our current accounting practices and disclosures. Such changes in the
presentation of our financial statements and related disclosures could change an investor’s interpretation or perception of our
financial position and results of operations.
We use many methods, estimates and judgments in applying our accounting policies (see “Critical Accounting Policies” in Item
7 of this Form 10-K). Such methods, estimates and judgments are, by their nature, subject to substantial risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, and factors may arise over time that lead us to change our methods, estimates and judgments. Changes in those
methods, estimates and judgments could significantly affect our results of operations.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and in multiple foreign jurisdictions. Due to economic and political
conditions, tax rates in various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. Our effective tax rates could be affected by
changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and
liabilities, or changes in tax laws or their interpretation. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on
December 22, 2017 and resulted in broad and significantly complex changes that impacted the corporate tax rate, our deferred
income taxes and the taxation of our foreign earnings. The comprehensive impact of the Tax Act is subject to future guidance and
interpretations by the U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service and other standard-setting bodies, which could
impact our effective tax rate and may have adverse or uncertain effects on our business and financial condition.
On March 27, 2020, Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) to provide
certain relief as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable
payroll tax credits, deferment of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum
tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for
qualified improvement property. Although we continue to examine the impacts the CARES Act may have on our business, results
of operations, financial condition and liquidity, we are immediately benefiting from the tax credit and payment deferment provisions
of the CARES Act.
We are also subject to the examination of tax returns and other tax matters by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax
authorities and governmental bodies. We regularly assess the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from these examinations
to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these examinations. If our
effective tax rates were to increase or if the ultimate determination of our taxes owed is for an amount in excess of amounts
previously accrued, our financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure
Our stock price is highly volatile.
The market price of our stock is highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors such as the following, some
of which are beyond our control:
•
•
•
•
•
quarterly variations in our operating results;
operating results that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
change in valuations, including our real estate held for sale;
changes in the overall travel, gaming, hospitality and leisure industries;
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts
and investors or such guidance provided by us;
29
•
•
•
•
•
•
announcements by us or companies in the travel, gaming, hospitality and leisure industries of significant contracts,
acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments, plans, prospects, service
offerings or operating results;
additions or departures of key personnel;
future sales of our securities;
trading and volume fluctuations;
other risk factors as discussed herein; and
other unforeseen events.
Stock markets in the U.S. have often experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Market fluctuations, as well as general
political and economic conditions including acts of terrorism, military conflicts, outbreak of a contagious disease, prolonged
economic uncertainty, a recession or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations, could adversely affect the market price of our stock.
We cannot provide assurance that we will pay dividends, or if paid, that dividend payments will be consistent with historical
levels.
In fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved the commencement of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock at
an annual rate of $0.60 per share, subject to quarterly declaration. The most recent dividend declared on March 5, 2020 was in
the amount of $1.76 per share. Dividends are funded through cash flow from operations, available cash on hand and borrowings
under the revolver portion of the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Vail Holdings Credit Agreement”). The
declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, and is limited by applicable state law concepts of
available funds for distribution, as well as contractual restrictions. As a result, the amount, if any, of the dividends to be paid in
the future will depend upon a number of factors, including our available cash on hand, anticipated cash needs, overall financial
condition, restrictions contained in our senior credit facility, the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, any future contractual restrictions,
future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors. In addition,
our Board of Directors may also suspend the payment of dividends at any time if it deems such action to be in the best interests
of the Company and its stockholders. For example, on April 1, 2020, in response to actions taken in response to COVID-19, we
announced that our Board of Directors suspended our quarterly dividend for at least two quarters. Additionally, during the period
that we are subject to the Temporary Waiver Period (See “Risks Relating to Our Capital Structure—Restrictions imposed by the
terms of our indebtedness may prevent or limit our future business plans.”), we are prohibited from paying any dividends or making
share repurchases, unless (x) no default or potential default exists under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and (y) we have
liquidity of at least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid and share repurchases made by us during the
Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter. If we do not pay dividends, the price of our common
stock must appreciate for investors to realize a gain on their investment in Vail Resorts, Inc. This appreciation may not occur and
our stock may in fact depreciate in value.
Anti-takeover provisions affecting us could prevent or delay a change of control that is beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, provisions of our debt instruments and other agreements and provisions
of applicable Delaware law and applicable federal and state regulations may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or other change
of control that holders of our securities may consider favorable. These provisions could:
•
•
•
•
delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our Company;
discourage bids for our securities at a premium over the market price;
adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of our securities; or
impede the ability of the holders of our securities to change our management.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to operate our business, to react to changes
in the economy or our industry, to fulfill our obligations under the Notes, to pay our other debts, and could divert our cash
flow from operations for debt payments.
We have a substantial amount of debt, which requires significant interest and principal payments. As of July 31, 2020, we had
$2.4 billion in total indebtedness outstanding. This amount includes (i) $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of our unsecured
senior notes issued on May 4, 2020 (the “Notes”), (ii) $1.2 billion of indebtedness pursuant to the term loan facility under Vail
Holdings, Inc.’s Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as amended (the “Vail Holdings Credit Agreement’’), (iii) $58.2
million of indebtedness under the Whistler Credit Agreement, (iv) $346.0 million with respect to the Canyons Obligation, (v)
$114.2 million with respect to the EPR Secured Notes under the master credit and security agreements and other related agreements
with EPT Ski Properties, Inc. and its affiliates (“EPR’’), as amended (collectively, the “EPR Agreements’’ and together with the
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and the Whistler Credit Agreement, the “Credit Agreements,’’ and such facilities, the “Credit
Facilities’’) and (vi) $51.5 million with respect to the EB-5 Development Notes. Our borrowings under the Vail Holdings Credit
30
Agreement are subject to interest rate changes substantially increasing our risk to changes in interest rates. Borrowings under the
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, including the term loan facility, currently bear interest annually at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%
and, for amounts in excess of $400.0 million, LIBOR is subject to a floor of 0.75% (during the Temporary Waiver Period, as
defined below). Subsequent to the expiration of the Temporary Waiver Period (as defined below), interest rate margins may fluctuate
based upon the ratio of our Net Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA on a trailing four-quarter basis. We also have, on a cumulative
basis, minimum lease payment obligations under operating leases of approximately $333.4 million as of July 31, 2020. Our level
of indebtedness and minimum lease payment obligations could have important consequences. For example, it could:
• make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our outstanding debt;
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, including
•
the annual payments under the Canyons lease, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures, real estate developments, marketing efforts and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;
limit our ability to borrow additional funds, refinance debt, or obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes;
•
•
•
• make it difficult for us to satisfy our obligations, including debt service requirements under our outstanding debt; and
•
cause potential or existing customers to not contract with us due to concerns over our ability to meet our financial
obligations, such as insuring against our professional liability risks, under such contracts.
Furthermore, our debt under our Credit Facilities bears interest at variable rates. We may be able to incur additional indebtedness
in the future. The terms of our senior credit facility and the Notes do not fully prohibit us from doing so. If we incur additional
debt, the related risks that we face could intensify.
Restrictions imposed by the terms of our indebtedness may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our credit agreements and the indenture governing the Notes may adversely
affect our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities and strategic initiatives that
may be in our long-term best interests.
Our credit agreements impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions limit our ability and the
ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:
incur or guarantee additional debt or issue capital stock;
pay dividends and make other distributions on, or redeem or repurchase, capital stock;
•
•
• make certain investments;
•
•
• merge or consolidate;
•
incur certain liens;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
enter into agreements that restrict the ability of subsidiaries to make dividends, distributions or other payments to us or
the guarantors;
designate restricted subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; and
transfer or sell assets.
•
•
On April 28, 2020, we entered into an amendment to the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, pursuant to which we will be exempt
from complying with the agreement’s maximum leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance
covenants for each of the fiscal quarters ending July 31, 2020 through January 31, 2022 (unless we make a one-time irrevocable
election to terminate such exemption period prior to such date) (such period, the “Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period”),
after which we will again be required to comply with such covenants starting with the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2022 (or
such earlier fiscal quarter as elected by us). Additionally, pursuant to this amendment, we are required to comply with a monthly
minimum liquidity test (defined as unrestricted cash and temporary cash investments of Vail Resorts, Inc. and its restricted
subsidiaries and available commitments under our revolving credit facility) of not less than $150.0 million, during the period
beginning July 31, 2020 and ending on the date VHI delivers a compliance certificate for the Company and its subsidiaries’ first
fiscal quarter following the end of the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period (such period, the “Temporary Waiver Period”).
31
During the Temporary Waiver Period, we are prohibited from the following (unless majority approval of the lenders is obtained
under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement):
•
paying any dividends or making share repurchases, unless (x) no default or potential default exists under the Credit
Agreement and (y) the Company has liquidity of at least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid and
share repurchases made by the Company during the Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal
quarter;
• making capital expenditures in excess of $200.0 million per 12-month period ending January 31, other than non-recurring
extraordinary capital expenditures incurred in connection with emergency repairs, life safety repairs or ordinary course
maintenance repairs;
incurring any indebtedness secured by the collateral under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement other than pursuant to
the existing revolving commitments under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement;
•
• making (i) non-ordinary course investments in unrestricted subsidiaries unless the Company has liquidity of at least
•
$300.0 million and (ii) investments in non-subsidiaries in excess of $50.0 million in the aggregate; and
acquiring all or a majority of the capital stock or all or any substantial portion of the assets of any entity or merging or
consolidating with another entity.
The indenture governing the Notes contains a number of significant restrictions and covenants that limit our ability to:
•
•
•
grant or permit liens;
engage in sale/leaseback transactions; and
engage in a consolidation or merger, or sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets.
In addition, the Whistler Credit Agreement contains restrictions on the ability of Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership
and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership (together “The WB Partnerships”) and their respective subsidiaries, and
the EPR Agreements contain restrictions on the ability of Peak Resorts and its subsidiaries, to make dividends, distributions or
other payments to us or the guarantors. We and our subsidiaries are subject to other covenants, representations and warranties in
respect of our Credit Facilities, including financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreements. Events beyond our control,
including the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, may affect our ability to comply with these covenants.
As a result of these restrictions, we will be limited as to how we conduct our business and we may be unable to raise additional
debt or equity financing to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities. The terms of any future
indebtedness we may incur could include more restrictive covenants. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain
compliance with these covenants in the future and, if we fail to do so, that we will be able to obtain waivers from the lenders and/
or amend the covenants.
There can be no assurance that we will meet the financial covenants contained in our credit agreements, when in effect. If we
breach any of these restrictions or covenants, or suffer a material adverse change which restricts our borrowing ability under our
Credit Facilities, we would not be able to borrow funds thereunder without a waiver. Any inability to borrow could have an adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, a breach, if uncured, could cause a default under
the applicable agreement(s) governing our indebtedness, in which case such we may be required to repay these borrowings before
their due date. We may not have or be able to obtain sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. If we are forced to
refinance these borrowings on less favorable terms or cannot refinance these borrowings, our results of operations and financial
condition could be adversely affected.
We cannot guarantee that we will repurchase our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program or that our
share repurchase program will enhance long-term stockholder value. Share repurchases could also increase the volatility
of the price of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves.
In March 2006, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to repurchase up to
3,000,000 shares of common stock. In July 2008, the Board of Directors increased the authorization by an additional 3,000,000
shares, and in December 2015, the Board increased the authorization by an additional 1,500,000 shares for a total authorization
to repurchase shares of up to 7,500,000 shares. Since inception of its share repurchase program through July 31, 2020, the Company
has repurchased 6,161,141 shares at a cost of approximately $404.4 million. As of July 31, 2020, 1,338,859 shares remained
available to repurchase under the existing share repurchase program which has no expiration date.
Although our Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate us to
repurchase any specific dollar amount or to acquire any specific number of shares. The timing and amount of repurchases, if any,
will depend upon several factors, including market and business conditions, the trading price of our common stock and the nature
of other investment opportunities. The repurchase program may be limited, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior
32
notice. In addition, repurchases of our common stock pursuant to our share repurchase program could cause our stock price to be
higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally,
our share repurchase program could diminish our cash reserves, which may impact our ability to finance future growth and to
pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions. There can be no assurance that any share repurchases will enhance
stockholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below levels at which we repurchased shares of
stock. Although our share repurchase program is intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, there is no assurance that it
will do so and short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES.
The following table sets forth the principal properties that we own or lease for use in our operations:
Location
Afton Alps, MN
Alpine Valley Resort, OH
Arrowhead Mountain, CO
Attitash Mountain, NH (279 acres)
BC Housing RiverEdge, CO
Bachelor Gulch Village, CO
Beaver Creek Resort, CO
Beaver Creek Mountain, CO (3,849
acres)
Beaver Creek Mountain Resort, CO
Big Boulder Mountain, PA
Boston Mills/Brandywine, OH
Breckenridge Ski Resort, CO
Breckenridge Mountain, CO (5,702
acres)
Breckenridge Terrace, CO
Broomfield, CO
Colter Bay Village, WY
Crested Butte Mountain Resort, CO
Ownership
Owned
Owned
Owned
SUP
26% Owned
Owned
Owned
SUP
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Use
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
clubhouse, buildings, commercial space and other
improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, golf
course, clubhouse, buildings, commercial space and other
improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management
and commercial space
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Employee housing facilities
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management
and commercial space
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management,
commercial space and real estate held for sale or
development
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Golf course, clubhouse, commercial space and residential
condominium units
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management,
commercial space and real estate held for sale or
development
SUP
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
50% Owned
Employee housing facilities
Leased
Corporate offices
Concessionaire
contract
Owned
Lodging and dining facilities
Buildings, other improvements and land used for
operation of Crested Butte Mountain Resort
Crested Butte Mountain Resort, CO (4,350 acres)
SUP
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Crotched Mountain, NH
Double Tree by Hilton Breckenridge, CO
Eagle-Vail, CO
Edwards, CO
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Lodging, dining and conference facilities
Warehouse facility
Administrative offices
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
33
Location
Falls Creek Alpine Resort, Victoria, Australia (1,112 acres)
Ownership
Leased
Use
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements
Headwaters Lodge & Cabins at Flagg Ranch, WY
Concessionaire
contract
Lodging and dining facilities
Heavenly Mountain Resort, CA & NV
Heavenly Mountain, CA & NV
(7,050 acres)
Hidden Valley Resort, MO
Hotham Alpine Resort, Victoria, Australia (791 acres)
Hotham Airport, Victoria, Australia
Hunter Mountain, NY
Jack Frost Ski Resort, PA
Jackson Hole Golf & Tennis Club,
WY
Jackson Lake Lodge, WY
Jenny Lake Lodge, WY
Keystone Conference Center, CO
Keystone Lodge, CO
Keystone Resort, CO
Keystone Mountain, CO (8,376 acres)
Keystone Ranch, CO
Kirkwood Mountain Resort, CA
Kirkwood Mountain, CA (2,330 acres)
Liberty Mountain Resort, PA
Mad River Mountain, OH
Mount Snow, VT (894 acres)
Mount Sunapee Resort, NH (850 acres)
Mt. Brighton, MI
Mt. Mansfield, VT (approximately 1,400 acres)
Northstar California Resort, CA
(7,200 acres)
Northstar Village, CA
Okemo Mountain Resort, VT
Okemo Mountain, VT (1,223 acres)
Okemo Valley Golf Club, VT
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements and commercial space
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements
Regional airport
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, golf
course, clubhouse, buildings, commercial space and other
improvements.
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Golf course, clubhouse, tennis and dining facilities
Lodging, dining and conference facilities
Lodging and dining facilities
Conference facility
Lodging, spa, dining and conference facilities
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, commercial space,
property management, dining and real estate held for sale
or development
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Golf course, clubhouse and dining facilities
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management
and commercial space
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, golf
course, clubhouse, buildings, and other improvements
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, golf
course, clubhouse, buildings, commercial space and other
improvements.
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements and commercial space
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings, commercial space and other improvements
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements used
for operation of Stowe Mountain Resort
Ski trails, ski lifts, golf course, commercial space, dining
facilities, buildings and other improvements
Commercial space, ski resort operations, dining facilities,
buildings, property management and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management
and commercial space
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, dining
facilities, buildings and other improvements
Golf course, dining facilities and commercial space
Owned
SUP
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Concessionaire
contract
Concessionaire
contract
Owned
Owned
Owned
SUP
Owned
Owned
SUP
Owned
Leased
SUP
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Owned
Leased
Owned
34
Location
Paoli Peaks, IN
Park City Mountain, UT
(8,900 acres)
Park City Mountain, UT
(220 acres)
Perisher Ski Resort, NSW, Australia
(3,335 acres)
Red Cliffs Lodge, CA
Red Sky Ranch, CO
River Course at Keystone, CO
Roundtop Mountain Resort, PA
Seasons at Avon, CO
Snow Creek, MO
SSI Venture, LLC (“VRR”) Properties; CO, CA, NV, UT,
MN & BC, Canada
Ski Tip Lodge, CO
Stevens Pass, WA
Stevens Pass Mountain, WA (2,443 acres)
Stevens Pass Ski Resort, WA
Stowe Mountain Resort, VT
The Arrabelle at Vail Square, CO
The Lodge at Vail, CO
The Osprey at Beaver Creek, CO
The Tarnes at Beaver Creek, CO
Tenderfoot Housing, CO
The Pines Lodge at Beaver Creek, CO
Vail Mountain, CO
Ownership
Owned
Leased (2)
Owned
Use
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings, commercial space, dining facilities, property
management, conference facilities and other
improvements (including areas previously referred to as
Canyons Resort, UT)
Ski trails, ski lifts, dining facilities, commercial space,
buildings, real estate held for sale or development and
other improvements
Owned/Leased/
Licensed
Ski trails, ski lifts, dining facilities, commercial space,
railway, buildings, lodging, conference facilities and other
improvements
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased/50%
Owned
Owned
Owned/Leased
Owned
Owned
SUP
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Dining facilities, ski resort operations, commercial space,
administrative offices
Golf courses, clubhouses, dining facilities and real estate
held for sale or development
Golf course and clubhouse
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings, commercial space and other improvements
Administrative offices and commercial space
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Approximately 265 rental and retail stores (of which
approximately 120 stores are currently held under lease)
for recreational products, and 6 leased warehouses
Lodging and dining facilities
Employee housing and guest parking facilities
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements and commercial space
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements and commercial space
Lodging, spa, dining and conference facilities
Lodging, spa, dining and conference facilities
Lodging, dining and conference facilities
31% Owned
50% Owned
Employee housing facilities
Employee housing facilities
Owned
Owned
Lodging, dining and conference facilities
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management,
commercial space and real estate held for sale or
development
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements, property management,
commercial space and real estate held for sale or
development
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails,
buildings and other improvements
Vail Mountain, CO (12,353 acres)
Whistler Blackcomb Resort, BC, Canada
SUP
75% Owned
Whistler Mountain and Blackcomb Mountain, BC, Canada MDA
Whistler Blackcomb Resort, BC, Canada
Whitetail Resort, PA
Wildcat Mountain, NH
Wilmot Mountain, WI
Leased
Owned
SUP/Owned
Employee housing facilities
Ski resort operations, including ski lifts, ski trails, golf
course, buildings, commercial space and other
improvements
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Owned
Ski trails, ski lifts, buildings and other improvements
Many of our properties are used across all segments in complementary and interdependent ways.
35
(1) The operations of Northstar are conducted on land and with operating assets owned by affiliates of EPR Properties under
operating leases which were assumed by us. The leases provide for the payment of a minimum annual base rent with periodic
increases in base rent over the lease term. In addition, the leases provide for the payment of percentage rent based on a
percentage of gross revenues generated at the property over certain thresholds. The initial term of the leases expires in fiscal
2027, and is subject to three 10-year renewal options.
(2) The operations of portions of Park City are conducted pursuant to a long-term lease on land and with certain operating
assets owned by TCFC LeaseCo, LLC and TCFC PropCo, LLC. The lease provides for the payment of a minimum annual
base rent with periodic increases in base rent over the lease term and participating contingent payments of a percentage of
the amount by which EBITDA for resort operations exceeds certain thresholds, also subject to periodic increases over the
lease term. The initial term of the lease expires in fiscal 2063 and is subject to six 50-year renewal options. Additionally, in
connection with the lease, we entered into certain ancillary agreements with third parties, including leases and easements,
allowing for various resort operations.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that we have adequate insurance coverage
and/or have accrued for all loss contingencies for asserted and unasserted matters and that, although the ultimate outcome of such
claims cannot be ascertained, current pending and threatened claims are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
36
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information and Dividend Policy
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “MTN.” As of September 21, 2020,
40,189,225 shares of common stock were outstanding, held by approximately 265 holders of record.
The following table sets forth information on the high and low sales prices of our common stock on the NYSE and the quarterly
cash dividends declared per share of common stock for each quarterly period for the two most recently completed fiscal years.
Quarter Ended
Fiscal Year 2020
July 31, 2020
April 30, 2020
January 31, 2020
October 31, 2019
Fiscal Year 2019
July 31, 2019
April 30, 2019
January 31, 2019
October 31, 2018
Market Price Per Share
Low
High
Cash
Dividends
Declared
Per Share
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
218.00
251.86
255.37
248.99
249.67
229.09
286.40
302.76
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
154.19
125.00
226.14
221.69
209.78
188.31
177.92
228.07
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
—
1.76
1.76
1.76
1.76
1.76
1.47
1.47
In fiscal 2011, our Board of Directors approved the commencement of a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common stock,
subject to quarterly declaration, which has typically been increased on an annual basis. We announced on April 1, 2020 that we
would be suspending the declaration of our quarterly dividend for at least the next two fiscal quarters in response to the impacts
of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, pursuant to the Third Amendment of the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement (as defined
below), we are prohibited from paying any dividends during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period (as defined below)
unless (i) no default or potential default exists under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and (ii) the Company has liquidity (as
defined below) of at least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid and share repurchases made by the Company
during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter. The amount, if any,
of dividends to be paid in the future will depend on our available cash on hand, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition,
restrictions contained in our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other factors
considered relevant by our Board of Directors.
Repurchase of Equity Securities
The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the fourth quarter of the year ended July 31, 2020 (“Fiscal
2020”). The share repurchase program is conducted under authorizations made from time to time by our Board of Directors. On
March 9, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to repurchase
up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock. On July 16, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the authorization by an
additional 3,000,000 shares, and on December 4, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the authorization by an
additional 1,500,000 shares for a total authorization to repurchase shares of up to 7,500,000 shares. Since inception of this stock
repurchase program through July 31, 2020, the Company has repurchased 6,161,141 shares at a cost of approximately $404.4
million. As of July 31, 2020, 1,338,859 shares remained available to repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization.
Repurchases under these authorizations may be made from time to time at prevailing prices as permitted by applicable laws, and
subject to market conditions, limitations under the April 2020 amendment to our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and other factors.
These authorizations have no expiration date.
Performance Graph
The total return graph below is presented for the period from the beginning of our fiscal year ended July 31, 2016 through the end
of Fiscal 2020. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested at the beginning of the period in our common stock (“MTN”),
37
The Russell 2000 Stock Index, The Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Travel and Leisure Stock Index,
with dividends reinvested where applicable. We include the Dow Jones U.S. Travel and Leisure Index as we believe we compete
in the travel and leisure industry.
The performance graph is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, unless such filings specifically incorporate
the performance graph by reference therein.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements
for the periods indicated. The financial data for our fiscal years ended and as of July 31, 2016 through July 31, 2020 should be
read in conjunction with those Consolidated Financial Statements, related notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The table presented below is unaudited. The data presented below is in thousands,
except for diluted net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc., cash dividends declared per share, effective ticket price
(“ETP”), average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) amounts.
38
Statement of Operations Data:
2020 (1) (2)
2019 (1)
Year Ended July 31,
2018 (1)
2017 (1)
2016 (1)
Total net revenue
$ 1,963,704
$ 2,271,575
$ 2,011,553
$ 1,907,218
$ 1,601,286
Total segment operating expense
1,466,380
1,571,738
1,396,023
1,322,841
1,152,496
Other operating expense, net
Other expense, net
Income before (provision) benefit from income taxes $
Net Income and Dividends:
Net income (3)
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. (3)
Diluted net income per share attributable to Vail
Resorts, Inc. (3)
Cash dividends declared per share
Other Segment Data:
Mountain
$
$
$
$
Skier visits (4)
ETP (5)
Lodging
ADR (6)
RevPAR (7)
Real Estate
Real estate held for sale and investment (8)
Other Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents (9)
Total assets (10)
Long-term debt, net (including long-term debt due
within one year)
Net Debt (11)
Total Vail Resorts, Inc. stockholders’ equity
(273,935)
(106,956)
116,433
109,055
98,833
2.42
5.28
13,483
67.72
310.76
90.37
96,844
390,980
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(223,568)
(77,304)
398,965
323,493
301,163
7.32
6.46
14,998
68.89
300.47
121.81
101,021
108,850
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(206,713)
(68,725)
340,092
401,230
379,898
9.13
5.046
12,345
71.31
300.90
131.08
99,385
178,145
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(205,121)
(30,807)
348,449
231,718
210,553
5.22
3.726
12,047
67.93
302.80
127.95
103,405
117,389
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(165,811)
(40,360)
242,619
149,454
149,754
4.01
2.865
10,032
65.59
280.38
122.61
111,088
67,897
$
$
$
$
$
$ 5,244,232
$ 4,426,077
$ 4,064,984
$ 4,110,718
$ 2,482,018
$ 2,450,799
$ 1,576,260
$ 1,272,732
$ 1,272,421
$ 2,059,819
$ 1,467,410
$ 1,094,587
$ 1,155,032
$ 1,316,742
$ 1,500,627
$ 1,589,434
$ 1,571,156
$
$
$
700,263
632,366
874,540
(1) We have completed several acquisitions of destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas during the past five years,
which impacts comparability between years, including Peak Resorts (acquired September 2019); Falls Creek and Hotham (acquired
April 2019); Crested Butte, Mount Sunapee and Okemo (acquired September 2018); Stevens Pass (acquired August 2018); Stowe
(acquired June 2017); and Whistler Blackcomb (acquired October 2016).
(2)
Financial results for the year ended July 31, 2020 were impacted by several one-time adjustments including (i) the deferral
of $120.9 million of deferred season pass revenue, as well as $2.9 million of related deferred costs, that would have been recognized
during the year ended July 31, 2020 but were deferred as a result of credits that were offered to customers who had purchased
2019/2020 North American pass products and who will purchase 2020/2021 North American pass products, and (ii) an asset
impairment of approximately $28.4 million as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Colorado resort ground
transportation company.
(3) Net income, net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. and diluted net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
were positively impacted during the year ended July 31, 2018 as a result of one-time tax benefits related to comprehensive U.S.
tax legislation, which also resulted in a decreased federal U.S. corporate tax rate prospectively from January 1, 2018, and excess
tax benefits from employee share award exercises, as discussed subsequently in this document.
(4) A skier visit represents a person purchasing a ticket or utilizing a pass to access a destination mountain resort or regional
ski area for any part of one day during a winter ski season and includes complimentary access.
39
(5)
ETP is calculated by dividing lift revenue by total skier visits during the respective periods.
(6) ADR is calculated by dividing total room revenue (includes both owned room and managed condominium unit revenue)
by the number of occupied rooms during the respective periods.
(7) RevPAR is calculated by dividing total room revenue (includes both owned room and managed condominium unit revenue)
by the number of rooms that are available to guests during the respective periods.
(8) Real estate held for sale and investment includes all land, development costs and other improvements associated with real
estate held for sale and investment.
(9) Cash and cash equivalents exclude restricted cash.
(10) We adopted a new lease accounting standard on August 1, 2019 using a modified retrospective transition method, in which
reporting periods beginning on August 1, 2019 are presented under the new standard, while prior periods were not adjusted and
continue to be reported in accordance with the previously applicable accounting guidance. As a result of adopting the new lease
accounting standard, the Company recorded $221.8 million of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and $254.2 million of related total
operating lease liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of August 1, 2019.
(11) Net Debt, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as long-term debt, net plus long-term debt due within one year less
cash and cash equivalents. Refer to the end of the Results of Operations section of Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a reconciliation of long-term debt, net to Net Debt.
40
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be
read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes related thereto included in this Form 10-K. To the extent
that the following MD&A contains statements which are not of a historical nature, such statements are forward-looking statements
which involve risks and uncertainties. These risks include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in
this Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Forward-Looking Statements section
and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” each included in this Form 10-K.
The MD&A includes discussion of financial performance within each of our three segments. We have chosen to specifically include
segment Reported EBITDA (defined as segment net revenue less segment operating expense, plus or minus segment equity
investment income or loss and for the Real Estate segment, plus gain or loss on sale of real property) and Net Debt (defined as
long-term debt, net plus long-term debt due within one year less cash and cash equivalents), in the following discussion because
we consider these measurements to be significant indications of our financial performance and available capital resources. Resort
Reported EBITDA, Total Reported EBITDA and Net Debt are not measures of financial performance or liquidity defined under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We utilize segment Reported EBITDA in evaluating our
performance and in allocating resources to our segments. We also believe that Net Debt is an important measurement as it is an
indicator of our ability to obtain additional capital resources for our future cash needs. Refer to the end of the Results of Operations
section for a reconciliation of net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. to Total Reported EBITDA and long-term debt, net to
Net Debt.
Items excluded from Reported EBITDA and Net Debt are significant components in understanding and assessing financial
performance or liquidity. Reported EBITDA and Net Debt should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to, or substitute
for, net income, net change in cash and cash equivalents or other financial statement data presented in the Consolidated Financial
Statements as indicators of financial performance or liquidity. Because Resort Reported EBITDA, Total Reported EBITDA and
Net Debt are not measurements determined in accordance with GAAP and are thus susceptible to varying calculations, Resort
Reported EBITDA, Total Reported EBITDA and Net Debt, as presented herein, may not be comparable to other similarly titled
measures of other companies. In addition, our segment Reported EBITDA (i.e. Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate), the measure
of segment profit or loss required to be disclosed in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to other similarly titled
measures of other companies.
Overview
Our operations are grouped into three integrated and interdependent segments: Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate. We refer to
“Resort” as the combination of the Mountain and Lodging segments. The Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate segments represented
approximately 87%, 13% and 0%, respectively, of our net revenue for Fiscal 2020.
On March 14, 2020, we announced a temporary closure of our North American Resorts and retail/rental operations as a result of
the COVID-19 pandemic and as a precautionary measure for the safety of our guests and employees beginning on March 15, 2020.
Subsequently on March 17, 2020, we announced the early closure of the 2019/2020 North American ski season for our North
American Resorts, lodging properties and retail stores. Additionally, the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in
restrictions, limitations or closures of our 2020 Australian ski area operations and 2020 North American summer operations. Two
of our Australian ski areas, Mount Hotham and Falls Creek, opened for their 2020 winter season on July 6, 2020 and were closed
four days later due to a “stay at home” order put in place by the Victorian government as a result of a reemergence of COVID-19
in the region. These actions (the “Resort Closures”), and the COVID-19 pandemic in general, had a significant adverse impact to
our results of operations for Fiscal 2020 as further described below in the discussion for each of our segments.
41
Mountain Segment
In the Mountain segment, the Company operates the following 37 destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas:
*Denotes a destination mountain resort, which generally receives a meaningful portion of skier visits from long-distance travelers,
as opposed to our regional ski areas, which tend to generate skier visits predominantly from their respective local markets.
Additionally, we operate ancillary services, including ski school, dining and retail/rental operations, and for our Australian ski
areas, including lodging and transportation operations. Mountain segment revenue is seasonal, with the majority of revenue earned
from our North American destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas (collectively, our “Resorts”) occurring in our second
and third fiscal quarters and the majority of revenue earned from our Australian ski areas occurring in our first and fourth fiscal
quarters. Our North American Resorts are typically open for business from mid-November through mid-April, which is the peak
operating season for the Mountain segment, and our Australian ski areas are typically open for business from June to early October.
Our single largest source of Mountain segment revenue is the sale of lift tickets (including pass products), which represented
approximately 53%, 53% and 51% of Mountain segment net revenue for Fiscal 2020, the fiscal year ended July 31, 2019 (“Fiscal
2019”) and the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018 (“Fiscal 2018”), respectively.
During Fiscal 2020 and as a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the Resort Closures, we announced that
we would offer credits to customers who had purchased 2019/2020 North American pass products towards the purchase of a
2020/2021 North American pass product if such purchase was made by September 17, 2020 (the “Credit Offer”). The Credit Offer
discounts range from a minimum of 20% to a maximum of 80% for season pass holders, depending on the number of days the
pass holder used their pass product during the 2019/2020 season and a credit, with no minimum, but up to 80% for multi-day pass
products, such as the Epic Day Pass, based on total unused days. As a result of the Credit Offer to 2019/2020 pass product holders,
we delayed the recognition of approximately $120.9 million of deferred season pass revenue, as well as approximately $2.9 million
of related deferred costs, that would have been recognized in Fiscal 2020 and are now expected to be recognized primarily in the
second and third quarters of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2021 (“Fiscal 2021”). While we expect most of this revenue and deferred
cost will be recognized during Fiscal 2021, in the event that a pass holder obtains a refund under Epic Coverage (as discussed
below) for the 2020/2021 North American ski season and is eligible to utilize their credit toward the purchase of a pass product
purchase for the 2021/2022 North American ski season, a portion of this deferred revenue and related deferred cost will be
recognized in Fiscal 2022.
42
Lift revenue is driven by volume and pricing. Pricing is impacted by both absolute pricing, as well as the demographic mix of
guests, which impacts the price points at which various products are purchased. The demographic mix of guests that visit our
North American mountain resorts is divided into two primary categories: (1) out-of-state and international (“Destination”) guests
and (2) in-state and local (“Local”) guests. For the 2019/2020 North American ski season, Destination guests comprised
approximately 58% of our North American destination mountain resort skier visits (excluding complimentary access), while Local
guests comprised approximately 42% of our North American destination mountain resort skier visits (excluding complimentary
access), which compares to approximately 57% and 43%, respectively, for the 2018/2019 North American ski season and
approximately 59% and 41%, respectively, for the 2017/2018 North American ski season. Skier visitation at our regional ski areas
is largely comprised of Local guests. Destination guests generally purchase our higher-priced lift tickets (including pass products)
and utilize more ancillary services such as ski school, dining and retail/rental, as well as lodging at or around our mountain resorts.
Destination guest visitation is less likely to be impacted by changes in the weather during the current ski season, but may be more
impacted by restrictions or preferences for travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic, adverse economic conditions, the global
geopolitical climate or weather conditions in the immediately preceding ski season. Local guests tend to be more value-oriented
and weather sensitive.
We offer a variety of pass products for all of our Resorts marketed towards both Destination and Local guests. Our pass product
offerings range from providing access to one or a combination of our Resorts to our Epic Pass, which allows pass holders unlimited
and unrestricted access to all of our Resorts. The Epic Day Pass, which we began offering for the 2019/2020 North American ski
season, is a customizable one to seven day pass product valid at each of our resorts, purchased in advance of the season, for those
skiers and riders who expect to ski a certain number of days during the season. For the upcoming 2020/2021 North American ski
season, we introduced Epic Mountain Rewards, a program which gives pass product holders a discount of 20% off on-mountain
food and beverage, lodging, group ski and ride school lessons, equipment rentals and more at the Company’s North American
owned and operated Resorts. Epic Mountain Rewards is available for everyone who purchases an Epic Pass, Epic Local Pass,
Epic Day Pass, Epic Military Pass and most of our other pass products, regardless of whether guests plan to ski one day or every
day of the season. Additionally, we introduced Epic Coverage for the 2020/2021 North American ski season, which is free for all
pass holders, completely replacing the need for pass insurance, and providing expanded coverage over our historical pass insurance
program. Epic Coverage provides refunds in the event of certain resort closures (e.g. for COVID-19), giving pass product holders
a refund for any portion of the season that is lost due to qualifying circumstances. Additionally, Epic Coverage provides a refund
for personal circumstances that were historically covered by our pass insurance program, such as eligible injuries, job losses and
many other personal events, as well as in the event that the pass holder cannot reserve their preferred days. Refunds for resort
closure events could vary based on the duration of the closure, certain elections made by the pass product holder and the number
of days skied by the pass product holder. We will estimate the amount of expected refunds under the Epic Coverage program and
will reduce the amount of pass product revenue recognized by that expected amount. The expected refunds will be calculated
utilizing estimates and assumptions, including historical data and current information. If we believe it is probable that upon
resolution of the contingencies for which we would provide refunds that a significant amount of revenue may be reversed, we will
not recognize those amounts as revenue until such time as the contingencies have been resolved.
Our pass program provides a compelling value proposition to our guests, which in turn assists us in developing a loyal base of
customers who commit to ski at our Resorts generally in advance of the ski season and typically ski more days each season at our
Resorts than those guests who do not buy pass products. Additionally, we have entered into strategic long-term season pass alliance
agreements with third-party mountain resorts including Telluride Ski Resort in Colorado, Sun Valley Resort in Idaho, Snowbasin
Resort in Utah, Hakuba Valley and Rusutsu Resort in Japan, Resorts of the Canadian Rockies in Canada, Les 3 Vallées in France,
4 Vallées in Switzerland, Skirama Dolomiti in Italy and Ski Arlberg in Austria, which further increases the value proposition of
our pass products. As such, our pass program drives strong customer loyalty, mitigates exposure to more weather sensitive guests,
generates additional ancillary spending and provides cash flow in advance of winter season operations. In addition, our pass
program attracts new guests to our Resorts. All of our pass products, including the Epic Pass and Epic Day Pass, are predominately
sold prior to the start of the ski season. Pass product revenue, although primarily collected prior to the ski season, is recognized
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations throughout the ski season primarily based on historical visitation (see Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
Lift revenue consists of pass product lift revenue (“pass revenue”) and non-pass product lift revenue (“non-pass revenue”).
Approximately 51%, 47% and 47% of total lift revenue was derived from pass revenue for Fiscal 2020 (including the impact of
the deferral of pass revenue as a result of the Credit Offer), Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively.
The cost structure of our mountain resort operations has a significant fixed component with variable expenses including, but not
limited to, land use permit or lease fees, credit card fees, retail/rental cost of sales and labor, ski school labor and expenses associated
with dining operations. As such, profit margins can fluctuate greatly based on the level of revenues associated with visitation.
43
Lodging Segment
Operations within the Lodging segment include (i) ownership/management of a group of luxury hotels through the RockResorts
brand proximate to our Colorado and Utah mountain resorts; (ii) ownership/management of non-RockResorts branded hotels and
condominiums proximate to our North American Resorts; (iii) National Park Service (“NPS”) concessionaire properties including
Grand Teton Lodge Company (“GTLC”); (iv) a Colorado resort ground transportation company; and (v) mountain resort golf
courses.
The performance of our lodging properties (including managed condominium units and our Colorado resort ground transportation
company) proximate to our mountain resorts is closely aligned with the performance of the Mountain segment and generally
experiences similar seasonal trends, particularly with respect to visitation by Destination guests. Revenues from such properties
represented approximately 73%, 70% and 68% of Lodging segment net revenue (excluding Lodging segment revenue associated
with reimbursement of payroll costs) for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. Management primarily focuses
on Lodging net revenue excluding payroll cost reimbursements and Lodging operating expense excluding reimbursed payroll
costs (which are not measures of financial performance under GAAP) as the reimbursements are made based upon the costs
incurred with no added margin; as such, the revenue and corresponding expense have no effect on our Lodging Reported EBITDA,
which we use to evaluate Lodging segment performance. Revenue of the Lodging segment during our first and fourth fiscal quarters
is generated primarily by the operations of our NPS concessionaire properties (as their operating season generally occurs from
June to the end of September); mountain resort golf operations and seasonally lower volume from our other owned and managed
properties and businesses. As discussed above, our North American lodging properties closed early in March for the remainder
of the 2019/2020 ski season as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our summer operations for the 2020 season were also limited
or adjusted, including at GTLC with the closures of Jackson Lake Lodge and Jenny Lake Lodge, as well as not offering guided
activities, in-restaurant dining and the temporary closure of many facilities, among others.
Real Estate Segment
The principal activities of our Real Estate segment include the sale of land parcels to third-party developers and planning for future
real estate development projects, including zoning and acquisition of applicable permits. We continue undertaking preliminary
planning and design work on future projects and are pursuing opportunities with third-party developers rather than undertaking
our own significant vertical development projects. Additionally, real estate development projects by third-party developers most
often result in the creation of certain resort assets that provide additional benefit to the Mountain segment. We believe that, due
to our low carrying cost of real estate land investments, we are well situated to promote future projects by third-party developers
while limiting our financial risk. Our revenue from the Real Estate segment and associated expense can fluctuate significantly
based upon the timing of closings and the type of real estate being sold, causing volatility in the Real Estate segment’s operating
results from period to period.
Recent Trends, Risks and Uncertainties
We have identified the following significant factors (as well as uncertainties associated with such factors) that could impact our
future financial performance:
• Given the escalating concerns surrounding the spread of COVID-19 and the potential impact that continuing to operate our
resorts would have had on our resort communities, we suspended the operations at all of our North American Resorts and
retail stores beginning on March 15, 2020 for the remainder of the 2019/2020 North American ski season. As a result of
the COVID-19 pandemic and in response to guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other local
and national health authorities, operations for the 2020 North American summer season were limited, adjusted or restricted.
Additionally, although our Mount Hotham and Falls Creek ski areas opened for their 2020 winter season on July 6, 2020,
we closed these two ski areas four days later due to a “stay at home” order put in place by the Victorian government as a
result of a reemergence of COVID-19 in the region. These various closures and limitations on our operations had a significant
negative impact on our results for Fiscal 2020, and we cannot predict the ultimate impact that the Resort Closures and other
business disruptions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to have on our results for the upcoming 2020/2021
North American ski season or our overall results for Fiscal 2021.
• The global outbreak of COVID-19 has led to travel restrictions and other adverse economic impacts including reduced
consumer confidence, an increase in unemployment rates and volatility in global and local economies. Although we are
uncertain as to the ultimate severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, the related global travel restrictions and other
adverse impacts, we have seen a significant negative change in performance and expect our future performance will also
be negatively impacted. In addition, the North American economy may be impacted by economic challenges in North
America or declining or slowing growth in economies outside of North America, accompanied by devaluation of currencies,
rising inflation, trade tariffs and lower commodity prices. We cannot predict the ultimate impact that the global economic
44
uncertainty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic will have on overall travel and leisure spending or more specifically, on
our guest visitation, guest spending or other related trends for the upcoming 2020/2021 North American ski season.
• The timing and amount of snowfall can have an impact on Mountain and Lodging revenue, particularly with regard to skier
visits and the duration and frequency of guest visitation. To help mitigate this impact, we sell a variety of pass products
prior to the beginning of the ski season which results in a more stabilized stream of lift revenue. In early March 2020, we
began our pass product sales program for the 2020/2021 North American ski season. In April 2020 and in connection with
our announcement of the Credit Offer, we announced significant extensions to our traditional deadlines for pass product
sales that normally would have occurred throughout the North American summer selling season. These extensions in our
traditional deadlines and broader impacts from COVID-19 has had a significant negative impact on pass product sales
through July 31, 2020 in comparison to the prior year comparable pass product sales. As previously discussed, as a result
of the Resort Closures, we provided a Credit Offer to 2019/2020 pass product holders to apply toward the purchase of a
2020/2021 pass product. Additionally, looking ahead to the 2020/2021 North American ski season, we are optimistic that
we will be operational for the ski season, but we also understand that many pass holders are nervous about the future given
the current uncertainty, as our ability to open our Resorts may depend on local and/or state restrictions outside of our control.
As a result, we introduced Epic Coverage for the 2020/2021 North American ski season, which is free for all pass holders
and completely replaces the need to purchase pass insurance. Epic Coverage provides refunds in the event of certain resort
closures (e.g., for COVID-19), giving pass product holders a refund for any portion of the season that is lost due to qualifying
circumstances. Additionally, Epic Coverage provides a refund for qualifying personal circumstances that were historically
covered by our pass insurance for eligible injuries, job losses and many other personal events, as well as in the event that
the pass holder cannot reserve their preferred days. In addition to these changes, in order to give our pass product holders
the time they need to make decisions regarding next season, we extended the deadline for pass holders to use their Credit
Offer and receive spring benefits (including Buddy Tickets) until September 17, 2020, and we extended the period for pass
holders to lock in their purchase with only $49 down. We also announced that we would be implementing a reservation
system for our 34 North American Resorts for the 2020/2021 North American ski season, which will only be available for
pass holders during the early season (paid lift tickets will not be sold until December 8, 2020).
Season pass sales through September 18, 2020 for the upcoming 2020/2021 North American ski season increased
approximately 18% in units and decreased approximately 4% in sales dollars as compared to the period in the prior year
through September 20, 2019, with sales dollars for this year reduced by the value of the redeemed credits provided to
2019/2020 North American pass holders. Without deducting for the value of the redeemed credits, sales dollars increased
approximately 24% compared to the prior year. Pass sales results are adjusted to eliminate the impact of foreign currency
by applying an exchange rate of $0.76 between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar in both periods for Whistler Blackcomb
pass sales.We cannot predict if this trend will continue for the entire duration of the fall 2020 North American pass sales
campaign, nor can we predict the overall impact that the Credit Offer, Epic Coverage, extended spring benefits and the
extended $49 down deadline will have on pass product sales or lift revenue for the upcoming 2020/2021 North American
ski season.
• On March 27, 2020, in response to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government enacted legislation
commonly referred to as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The CARES Act
includes various amendments to the U.S. tax code that impacted the Company’s accounting and reporting for income taxes
during Fiscal 2020 and is expected to continue to impact the Company’s accounting and reporting for income taxes in the
future, including the following: (i) allowing a carryback of the entire amount of eligible Federal net operating losses (“NOLs”)
generated in calendar years 2018, 2019 and 2020 for up to five years prior to when such losses were incurred, representing
a change from previous rules under the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), in which NOLs could not be carried
back to prior years and utilization was limited to 80% of taxable income in future years; (ii) treatment of certain qualified
improvement property (“QIP”) as 15-year property and allowing such QIP placed in service after December 31, 2017 to
be eligible for bonus depreciation, which the Company expects will incrementally add to its pre-existing NOLs; and (iii)
increases in the allowable business interest deduction from 30% of adjusted taxable income to 50% of adjusted taxable
income for calendar years 2019 and 2020. The CARES Act also provides for refundable employee retention tax credits and
defers the requirement to remit the employer-paid portion of social security payroll taxes. As a result, we recorded a benefit
of approximately $9.6 million during Fiscal 2020, which primarily offset Mountain and Lodging operating expense, as a
result of wages paid to employees who were not providing services. We are still in the process of fully evaluating the
potential benefits that the amendments discussed above will have on our financial statements. We also recognized a credit
of approximately $8.5 million during Fiscal 2020 as a result of the recent Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy and Australian
JobKeeper legislation for our Canadian and Australian employees, which primarily offset Mountain and Lodging operating
expense.
45
• As of July 31, 2020, we had $391.0 million of cash and cash equivalents as well as $418.8 million available under the
revolver component of our Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2018 and as amended
most recently on April 28, 2020 (the “Vail Holdings Credit Agreement”), which represents the total commitment of $500.0
million less certain letters of credit outstanding of $81.2 million. Additionally, we have a credit facility which supports the
liquidity needs of Whistler Blackcomb (the “Whistler Credit Agreement”). As of July 31, 2020, we had C$221.1 million
($165.1 million) available under the revolver component of the Whistler Credit Agreement (which represents the total
commitment of C$300.0 million ($224.0 million) less outstanding borrowings of C$78.0 million ($58.2 million) and a letter
of credit outstanding of C$0.9 million ($0.7 million)).
On April 28, 2020, we entered into the Third Amendment to our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”).
Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the Company is exempt from complying with the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement’s
maximum leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance covenants for each of the fiscal quarters
ended July 31, 2020 through January 31, 2022 (unless we make a one-time irrevocable election to terminate such exemption
prior to such date) (such period, the “Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period”), after which we will be required to
comply with such covenants starting with the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2022 (or such earlier fiscal quarter as elected
by us). During the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, we are subject to other restrictions which will limit our
ability to make future acquisitions, investments, distributions to stockholders, share repurchases or incur additional debt.
See Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information. Additionally, on May 4, 2020, we completed an offering
of $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “Notes”) in a private placement
conducted pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, a portion of which was
utilized to pay down the outstanding balance of the revolver component of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement in its entirety
(which will continue to be available to the Company to borrow including throughout the Financial Covenants Temporary
Waiver Period). The Notes are guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, availability under our credit agreements and the expected positive
cash flow from operating activities of our Mountain and Lodging segments less resort capital expenditures will continue
to provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our operations through at least the 2021/2022 ski season, even in the event
of extended resort shutdowns.
• On September 24, 2019, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Peak Resorts,
Inc. (“Peak Resorts”) at a purchase price of $11.00 per share or approximately $264.5 million. In addition, contemporaneous
with the closing the transaction, Peak Resorts was required to pay approximately $70.2 million of certain outstanding debt
instruments and lease obligations in order to complete the transaction. Accordingly, the total purchase price, including the
repayment of certain outstanding debt instruments and lease obligations, was approximately $334.7 million, for which we
borrowed approximately $335.6 million under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement to fund the acquisition. The newly
acquired resorts include: Mount Snow in Vermont; Hunter Mountain in New York; Attitash Mountain Resort, Wildcat
Mountain and Crotched Mountain in New Hampshire; Liberty Mountain Resort, Roundtop Mountain Resort, Whitetail
Resort, Jack Frost and Big Boulder in Pennsylvania; Alpine Valley, Boston Mills, Brandywine and Mad River Mountain
in Ohio; Hidden Valley and Snow Creek in Missouri; and Paoli Peaks in Indiana. The acquisition included the mountain
operations of the resorts, including base area skier services (food and beverage, retail and rental, lift ticket offices and ski
and snowboard school facilities), as well as lodging operations at certain resorts. We expect that the acquisition of Peak
Resorts will positively contribute to our annual results of operations; however we cannot predict the ultimate impact the
new resorts will have on our future results of operations.
46
Results of Operations
Summary
Shown below is a summary of operating results for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 (in thousands):
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Income before (provision) benefit from income taxes
Mountain Reported EBITDA
Lodging Reported EBITDA
Resort Reported EBITDA
Real Estate Reported EBITDA
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
98,833
116,433
500,080
3,269
503,349
$
(4,128) $
$
$
$
301,163
398,965
678,594
28,100
706,694
$
(4,317) $
379,898
340,092
591,605
25,006
616,611
957
A discussion of segment results, including reconciliations of net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. to Total Reported EBITDA,
and other items can be found below. The consolidated results of operations, including any consolidated financial metrics pertaining
thereto, include the operations of Peak Resorts (acquired September 24, 2019), Falls Creek and Hotham (acquired April 4, 2019),
Triple Peaks (acquired September 27, 2018) and Stevens Pass (acquired August 15, 2018), prospectively from their respective
dates of acquisition.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the Resort Closures both had a significant adverse impact to our results of operations for Fiscal
2020, as further described below in our segment results of operations.
The sections titled “Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019” and “Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018” in each of the Mountain
and Lodging segment discussions below provide comparisons of financial and operating performance for Fiscal 2020 to Fiscal
2019 and Fiscal 2019 to Fiscal 2018, respectively, unless otherwise noted.
47
Mountain Segment
Mountain segment operating results for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 are presented by category as follows (in thousands,
except ETP):
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2020
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
2018
2020/2019
2019/2018
Mountain net revenue:
Lift
Ski school
Dining
Retail/rental
Other
Total Mountain net revenue
Mountain operating expense:
Labor and labor-related benefits
Retail cost of sales
Resort related fees
General and administrative
Other
Total Mountain operating expense
Mountain equity investment income, net
Mountain Reported EBITDA
Total skier visits
ETP
$
$
$
913,091
189,131
160,763
270,299
177,159
1,710,443
473,365
96,497
75,044
239,412
327,735
1,212,053
1,690
500,080
13,483
67.72
$
$
$
1,033,234
215,060
181,837
320,267
205,803
1,956,201
507,811
121,442
96,240
233,159
320,915
1,279,567
1,960
678,594
14,998
68.89
$
$
$
880,293
189,910
161,402
296,466
194,851
1,722,922
443,891
111,198
87,111
214,090
276,550
1,132,840
1,523
591,605
12,345
71.31
(11.6)%
(12.1)%
(11.6)%
(15.6)%
(13.9)%
(12.6)%
(6.8)%
(20.5)%
(22.0)%
2.7 %
2.1 %
(5.3)%
(13.8)%
(26.3)%
(10.1)%
(1.7)%
17.4 %
13.2 %
12.7 %
8.0 %
5.6 %
13.5 %
14.4 %
9.2 %
10.5 %
8.9 %
16.0 %
13.0 %
28.7 %
14.7 %
21.5 %
(3.4)%
Mountain Reported EBITDA includes $17.4 million, $16.5 million and $15.7 million of stock-based compensation expense for
Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively.
Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019
Mountain Reported EBITDA decreased $178.5 million, or 26.3%, primarily due to the impact of the delayed recognition of $120.9
million of pass product revenue during Fiscal 2020 as a result of the Credit Offer to 2019/2020 North American pass product
holders from the Resort Closures and the overall impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in significantly reduced
visitation and operations at our Resorts and retail stores for the 2019/2020 North American ski season, the 2020 Australian ski
season and our 2020 North American summer operations. These decreases were partially offset by the incremental operations of
Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham. Mountain segment results include $13.6 million and $16.4 million of acquisition and
integration related expenses for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively, which are recorded within Mountain other operating
expense.
Lift revenue decreased $120.1 million, or 11.6%, primarily due to a 3.4% decrease in pass product revenue and an 18.8% decrease
in non-pass revenue. Pass product revenue decreased primarily as a result of the deferral of approximately $120.9 million of pass
product revenue associated with the Credit Offer to 2019/2020 North American pass product holders, which would have been
recognized during Fiscal 2020 and which is now expected to be recognized primarily in the second and third quarters of Fiscal
2021, partially offset by a combination of an increase in pricing and units sold and increased pass sales to Destination guests, as
well as the introduction of the Epic Day Pass. Non-pass revenue decreased primarily due to significantly reduced skier visitation
as a result of the Resort Closures, partially offset by an increase in non-pass ETP (excluding Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham)
of 6.2% and incremental revenue from Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham of approximately $61.4 million. Total non-pass
ETP, including the impact of Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham decreased 7.3%.
Ski school revenue, dining revenue and retail/rental revenue in Fiscal 2020 all decreased compared to Fiscal 2019 due to the Resort
Closures. These decreases were partially offset by incremental revenue from our acquisitions of Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and
Hotham of $18.0 million of ski school revenue, $23.8 million of dining revenue and $26.8 million of retail/rental revenue.
48
Other revenue mainly consists of summer visitation and mountain activities revenue, employee housing revenue, guest services
revenue, commercial leasing revenue, marketing and internet advertising revenue, private club revenue (which includes both club
dues and amortization of initiation fees), municipal services revenue and other recreation activity revenue. Other revenue is also
comprised of Australian ski area lodging and transportation revenue. For Fiscal 2020, other revenue decreased as a result of the
Resort Closures, partially offset by incremental revenue from Peak Resorts of approximately $12.6 million.
Resort Closures and the associated actions taken by the Company to reduce costs resulted in a decrease in our operating expense
of $67.5 million, or 5.3%, which includes incremental operating expenses from Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham of
approximately $121.4 million, as well as $13.6 million and $16.4 million of acquisition and integration related expenses for Fiscal
2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively.
Labor and labor-related benefits decreased 6.8%, which primarily resulted from cost actions associated with the Resort Closures,
including decreased staffing, employee furloughs, salary reductions and reduced variable compensation accruals, as well as tax
credits of approximately $12.0 million associated with recent COVID-19 related legislation passed in the U.S., Canada and
Australia, partially offset by incremental expenses from Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham of approximately $50.7 million.
Retail cost of sales decreased 20.5% compared to a decrease in retail sales of 20.1%. Resort related fees decreased 22.0% primarily
due to decreases in revenue on which those fees are based, partially offset by incremental expenses from Peak Resorts of
approximately $4.3 million. General and administrative expense increased 2.7% primarily due to incremental expenses from Peak
Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham of approximately $18.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in allocated corporate overhead
costs, a decrease in variable compensation accruals primarily as a result of the Resort Closures and tax credits of approximately
$3.3 million associated with recent COVID-19 related legislation passed in the U.S., Canada and Australia. Other expense increased
2.1% primarily due to incremental operating expenses from Peak Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham of approximately $42.2 million,
partially offset by decreases in variable operating expenses associated with the Resort Closures, as well as a decrease in acquisition
and integration related expenses.
Mountain equity investment income, net primarily includes our share of income from the operations of a real estate brokerage
joint venture.
Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018
The results reflect an increase in Mountain Reported EBITDA of $87.0 million, or 14.7%, primarily as a result of strong North
American pass sales growth for the 2018/2019 North American ski season, strong growth in visitation and spending at our western
U.S. resorts and the incremental operations of Stevens Pass, Triple Peaks and Falls Creek/Hotham (acquired in August 2018,
September 2018 and April 2019, respectively). Although our Destination guest visitation was less than expected in the pre-holiday
period, results from the key holiday weeks through the spring were largely in line with our original expectations, which, when
combined with incremental skier visits from Stevens Pass, Triple Peaks and Falls Creek/Hotham, resulted in an increase in total
skier visitation of 21.5%. Operating results from Whistler Blackcomb and Perisher, which are translated from Canadian dollars
and Australian dollars, respectively, to U.S. dollars, were adversely affected by a decrease in the Canadian and Australian dollar
exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar as compared to prior year, resulting in a decline in Mountain Reported EBITDA of
approximately $8 million, which the Company calculated on a constant currency basis by applying current period foreign exchange
rates to the prior period results. Additionally, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 results include $16.4 million and $10.2 million of
acquisition and integration related expenses, respectively.
Lift revenue increased $152.9 million, or 17.4%, due to increases in both pass revenue and non-pass revenue, as well as incremental
revenue from Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham. Pass revenue increased 16.8%, which was driven by a
combination of an increase in pricing and units sold and was also favorably impacted by increased pass sales to Destination guests
as well as military guests through the introduction of the Military Epic Pass. Non-pass revenue increased 17.9% primarily due to
incremental non-pass skier visitation at Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham, and increased non-pass visitation at
our western U.S. resorts, which benefited from improved conditions as compared to the prior year and an increase in total non-
pass ETP of 4.9%. Total ETP decreased $2.42, or 3.4%, primarily due to higher skier visitation by season pass holders, lower ETP
from the acquired Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham resorts and the new Military Epic Pass, partially offset by
price increases in both our lift ticket and pass products.
Ski school revenue increased $25.2 million, or 13.2%, and dining revenue increased $20.4 million, or 12.7%, primarily as a result
of incremental revenue at Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham, which represented approximately $13.4 million
and $12.9 million of the total increase for ski school revenue and dining revenue, respectively. The remaining increases were
primarily due to higher skier visitation.
49
Retail/rental revenue increased $23.8 million, or 8.0%, of which retail revenue increased $13.6 million, or 6.7%, and rental revenue
increased $10.2 million, or 11.0%. The increase in both retail revenue and rental revenue was primarily attributable to higher sales
volumes at stores proximate to our western U.S. resorts and other stores in Colorado, as well as incremental revenue from Triple
Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham of approximately $13.1 million. These increases were partially offset by removing
the low-margin golf product line from our Colorado city stores, store closures and a decrease in sales at Whistler Blackcomb.
Other revenue mainly consists of summer visitation and mountain activities revenue, employee housing revenue, guest services
revenue, commercial leasing revenue, marketing and internet advertising revenue, private club revenue (which includes both club
dues and amortization of initiation fees), municipal services revenue and other recreation activity revenue. Other revenue is also
comprised of Australian ski area lodging and transportation revenue. For Fiscal 2019, other revenue increased $11.0 million, or
5.6%, primarily attributable to incremental revenue from Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham of $6.0 million, as
well as increases in marketing revenue and mountain activities and services revenue.
Operating expense increased $146.7 million, or 13.0%, which was primarily attributable to the inclusion of Triple Peaks, Stevens
Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham, whose operating expenses were recorded prospectively from their respective dates of acquisition.
Additionally, operating expense includes $16.4 million and $10.2 million of acquisition and integration related expenses for Fiscal
2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively.
Labor and labor-related benefits increased 14.4% primarily due to incremental labor expenses from Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass,
Falls Creek and Hotham of $41.0 million and increased staffing levels at our western U.S. resorts as compared to the prior year
due to historic low snowfall during the prior year period, as well as wage increases associated with our minimum wage initiatives,
which were in excess of our historical minimum wage increases, and higher variable compensation accruals. Retail cost of sales
increased 9.2% compared to an increase in retail sales of 6.7%. Resort related fees increased 10.5% primarily due to incremental
expenses from Triple Peaks and Stevens Pass of $5.3 million as well as increases in revenue on which those fees are based. General
and administrative expense increased 8.9% primarily due to incremental expenses from Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek
and Hotham of $12.4 million, an increase in variable compensation accruals and an increase in allocated corporate overhead costs
primarily associated with marketing and information technology. Other expense increased 16.0% primarily due to incremental
expenses from Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham of $26.6 million, as well as increases in season pass alliance
expense, acquisition and integration related expenses, employee housing expense, fuel expense and rent expense.
Mountain equity investment income, net primarily includes our share of income from the operations of a real estate brokerage
joint venture.
50
Lodging Segment
Lodging segment operating results for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 are presented by category as follows (in thousands,
except ADR and RevPAR):
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2020
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
2018
2020/2019
2019/2018
Lodging net revenue:
Owned hotel rooms
Managed condominium rooms
Dining
Transportation
Golf
Other
Payroll cost reimbursements
Total Lodging net revenue
Lodging operating expense:
Labor and labor-related benefits
General and administrative
Other
Reimbursed payroll costs
Total Lodging operating expense
Lodging Reported EBITDA
Owned hotel statistics (1)
ADR
RevPar
Managed condominium statistics (1)
ADR
RevPar
Owned hotel and managed condominium
statistics (combined) (1)
ADR
RevPar
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
44,992
76,480
38,252
15,796
17,412
44,933
237,865
10,549
248,414
114,279
39,283
81,034
234,596
10,549
245,145
3,269
266.43
122.34
328.98
83.10
310.76
90.37
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
64,826
86,236
53,730
21,275
19,648
54,617
300,332
14,330
314,662
135,940
41,256
95,036
272,232
14,330
286,562
28,100
256.50
175.45
324.34
107.67
300.47
121.81
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
65,252
70,198
48,554
21,111
18,110
47,577
270,802
13,841
284,643
121,733
37,716
86,347
245,796
13,841
259,637
25,006
250.50
173.34
336.29
116.26
300.90
131.08
(30.6)%
(11.3)%
(28.8)%
(25.8)%
(11.4)%
(17.7)%
(20.8)%
(26.4)%
(21.1)%
(15.9)%
(4.8)%
(14.7)%
(13.8)%
(26.4)%
(14.5)%
(88.4)%
3.9 %
(30.3)%
1.4 %
(22.8)%
3.4 %
(25.8)%
(0.7)%
22.8 %
10.7 %
0.8 %
8.5 %
14.8 %
10.9 %
3.5 %
10.5 %
11.7 %
9.4 %
10.1 %
10.8 %
3.5 %
10.4 %
12.4 %
2.4 %
1.2 %
(3.6)%
(7.4)%
(0.1)%
(7.1)%
(1) RevPAR for Fiscal 2020 declined from the prior comparative period primarily due to the Resort Closures. Owned hotel and
managed condominium statistics (combined) for Fiscal 2019 declined from the prior comparative period primarily due to the
inclusion of properties acquired through the Triple Peaks acquisition, prospectively from the date of acquisition, as well as a new
property management contract for units proximate to our Tahoe resorts.
Lodging Reported EBITDA includes $3.4 million, $3.2 million and $3.2 million of stock-based compensation expense for Fiscal
2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively.
Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019
Lodging Reported EBITDA for Fiscal 2020 decreased $24.8 million, or 88.4%, primarily due to the impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic and the associated Resort Closures.
Primarily as a result of the Resort Closures, revenue from owned hotel rooms, managed condominium rooms, dining, transportation,
golf and other revenue each decreased. The decreases resulting from the Resort Closures were partially offset by $13.7 million of
incremental revenue from Peak Resorts and Triple Peaks.
51
Operating expense (excluding reimbursed payroll costs) decreased 13.8%. Labor and labor related benefits decreased 15.9%
primarily due to cost actions associated with the Resort Closures, including decreased staffing, employee furloughs, salary
reductions and reduced variable compensation accruals, as well as tax credits of approximately $2.2 million associated with recent
COVID-19 related legislation passed in the U.S., Canada and Australia, partially offset by $6.4 million of incremental expenses
from Peak Resorts and Triple Peaks. General and administrative expense decreased 4.8% due to lower allocated corporate overhead
costs primarily associated with a reduction in variable compensation accruals, as well as tax credits of approximately $0.5 million
associated with recent COVID-19 related legislation passed in the U.S., Canada and Australia. Other expenses decreased 14.7%
primarily related to lower variable expenses associated with the impact of the Resort Closures, partially offset by $4.7 million of
incremental expenses from Peak Resorts and Triple Peaks.
Revenue from payroll cost reimbursement and the corresponding reimbursed payroll costs relate to payroll costs at managed hotel
properties where we are the employer and all payroll costs are reimbursed by the owners of the properties under contractual
arrangements. Since the reimbursements are made based upon the costs incurred with no added margin, the revenue and
corresponding expense have no effect on our Lodging Reported EBITDA.
Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018
Lodging Reported EBITDA for Fiscal 2019 increased $3.1 million, or 12.4%, primarily due to the incremental operations of Triple
Peaks.
Revenue from managed condominium rooms increased $16.1 million, or 22.8%, primarily due to incremental revenue from Okemo
and Crested Butte of $11.7 million, as well as revenue from incremental managed Tahoe lodging properties that we did not manage
in the prior year. Dining revenue increased $5.2 million, or 10.7%, primarily due to incremental revenue from our Okemo and
Crested Butte lodging properties of $4.3 million and an increase in dining revenue at our Park City lodging properties. Golf revenue
increased $1.5 million, or 8.5%, primarily due to incremental revenue from our golf courses at Okemo of $0.8 million, as well as
higher revenue at our golf courses in Beaver Creek and at GTLC. Other revenue increased $7.0 million, or 14.8%, primarily due
to an increase in allocated corporate revenue, incremental revenue from our lodging properties at Okemo and Crested Butte of
$2.4 million, a business interruption insurance recovery related to a closed event facility in Breckenridge and increases in ancillary
revenue.
Operating expense (excluding reimbursed payroll costs) increased 10.8%. Labor and labor-related benefits increased 11.7%,
primarily due to incremental labor expenses from Okemo, Crested Butte and the incremental managed Tahoe lodging properties
that we did not manage in the prior year of $11.3 million, as well as wage increases associated with our minimum wage initiatives,
which were in excess of our historical minimum wage increases. General and administrative expense increased 9.4% due to higher
corporate overhead costs. Other expense increased 10.1% primarily due to incremental expenses from Okemo and Crested Butte
of $6.0 million, as well as an increase in variable operating expenses associated with increases in revenue.
Revenue from payroll cost reimbursement and the corresponding reimbursed payroll costs relate to payroll costs at managed hotel
properties where we are the employer and all payroll costs are reimbursed by the owners of the properties under contractual
arrangements. Since the reimbursements are made based upon the costs incurred with no added margin, the revenue and
corresponding expense have no effect on our Lodging Reported EBITDA.
Real Estate Segment
Our Real Estate net revenue is primarily determined by the timing of closings and the mix of real estate sold in any given period.
Different types of projects have different revenue and profit margins; therefore, as the real estate inventory mix changes, it can
greatly impact Real Estate segment net revenue, operating expense, gain on sale of real property and Real Estate Reported EBITDA.
52
Real Estate segment operating results for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 are presented by category as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended July 31,
Percentage
Increase/(Decrease)
2020
2019
2018
2020/2019
2019/2018
$
4,847
$
712
$
3,988
580.8 %
(82.1)%
3,932
5,250
9,182
207
(4,128) $
13
5,596
5,609
580
(4,317) $
3,927
(381)
3,546
515
957
30,146.2 %
(6.2)%
63.7 %
(64.3)%
4.4 %
(99.7)%
1,568.8 %
58.2 %
12.6 %
(551.1)%
Total Real Estate net revenue
Real Estate operating expense:
Cost of sales (including sales
commissions)
Other, net
Total Real Estate operating expense
Gain on sale of real property
Real Estate Reported EBITDA
$
Fiscal 2020
During Fiscal 2020, we closed on the sale of a development land parcel for $4.1 million which was recorded within Real Estate
net revenue, with a corresponding cost of sale (including sales commission) of $3.9 million.
Other, net operating expense of $5.3 million was primarily comprised of general and administrative costs, such as labor and labor-
related benefits, professional services and allocated corporate overhead costs.
Fiscal 2019
We closed on two land sales during the third quarter of Fiscal 2019 with third party developers at Keystone (One River Run site)
and Breckenridge (East Peak 8 site) for proceeds of approximately $16.0 million, including $4.8 million associated with the sale
of density for the Breckenridge property. The land parcel sales were accounted for as financing arrangements as a result of the
Company’s continuing involvement with the underlying assets that were sold, including but not limited to, the obligation to
repurchase finished commercial space from the development projects upon completion. As a result, the estimated gain of $3.6
million associated with the East Peak 8 site and the estimated loss of $3.2 million associated with the One River Run site will be
deferred until the Company no longer maintains continuing involvement. Additionally, the Company’s future obligation to
repurchase finished commercial space in the two completed projects, as well as other related capital spending, will result in total
estimated capital expenditures of up to approximately $9.5 million in future fiscal years.
Other, net operating expense of $5.6 million was primarily comprised of general and administrative costs, such as labor and labor-
related benefits, professional services and allocated corporate overhead costs. Real Estate Reported EBITDA also included a gain
on sale of real property of $0.6 million for the sale of land parcels.
Fiscal 2018
During Fiscal 2018, we closed on the sales of development land parcels for $3.5 million which were recorded within Real Estate
net revenue, with a corresponding cost of sale (including sales commissions) of $3.9 million.
Other, net operating expense included the recognition of a $5.5 million benefit (non-cash in the period) related to a legal settlement
in Fiscal 2015 for which cash proceeds were received and established as a liability for estimated future remediation costs of a
construction development. All known items were remediated in Fiscal 2018 and, based on continued monitoring, the Company
concluded that the need for further remediation is remote. Additionally, other, net operating expense included general and
administrative costs, such as labor and labor-related benefits, professional services and allocated corporate overhead costs. Real
Estate Reported EBITDA also included a gain on sale of real property of $0.5 million for the sale of a land parcel.
53
Other Items
In addition to segment operating results, the following items contributed to our overall financial position and results of operations
(in thousands).
Year Ended July 31,
Depreciation and amortization
Asset impairments
2020
$ (249,572)
$ (28,372)
2019
$ (218,117)
$
— $
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
$
2,964
$
(5,367)
Interest expense, net
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans
(Provision) benefit from income taxes
Effective tax rate (provision) benefit
$ (106,721)
$ (79,496)
$
$
(3,230)
(7,378)
$
(2,854)
$ (75,472)
2018
$ (204,462)
—
$
$
$
$
1,854
(63,226)
(8,966)
61,138
Percentage Increase/
(Decrease)
2020/2019
2019/2018
14.4 %
nm
6.7 %
nm
155.2 %
(389.5)%
34.2 %
13.2 %
(90.2)%
25.7 %
(68.2)%
223.4 %
36.9 pts
(6.3)%
(18.9)%
18.0%
(12.6 pts)
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019 increased over the
applicable prior fiscal year primarily due to assets acquired in the Peak Resorts acquisition (acquired in Fiscal 2020), as well as
due to assets acquired in the Falls Creek, Hotham, Triple Peaks and Stevens Pass acquisitions (each acquired in Fiscal 2019) and
discretionary capital projects completed at our resorts in each fiscal year.
Asset impairments. We recorded an asset impairment of approximately $28.4 million during Fiscal 2020 as a result of the effects
of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Colorado resort ground transportation company, with corresponding reductions to goodwill,
net of $25.7 million and intangible assets, net and property, plant and equipment, net of $2.7 million. See Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information.
Change in fair value of contingent consideration. We recorded a gain of $3.0 million during Fiscal 2020 primarily related to the
estimated Contingent Consideration payments for Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2021. We recorded a loss of $5.4 million during Fiscal
2019 primarily related to the estimated Contingent Consideration payment for Fiscal 2019. We recorded a gain of $1.9
million during Fiscal 2018 primarily related to a decrease in the estimated Contingent Consideration payment for Fiscal 2018.
The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is based on assumptions for EBITDA of Park City in future periods, as
calculated under the lease on which participating payments are determined, and was $17.8 million and $27.2 million as of July
31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net for Fiscal 2020 increased compared to Fiscal 2019 primarily due to debt obligations
assumed in the Peak Resorts acquisition; borrowings under our 6.25% unsecured bond offering which was completed on May 4,
2020; incremental term loan borrowings under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement of $335.6 million, which were used to fund
the Peak Resorts acquisition in September 2019; and incremental borrowings under the revolver components of our Vail Holdings
Credit Agreement and Whistler Credit Agreement, which were almost entirely drawn on during Fiscal 2020 as a precautionary
measure in order to increase our cash position and financial flexibility in light of the financial market conditions resulting from
the COVID-19 pandemic and were subsequently paid down, partially offset by a decrease in variable interest rates. Interest expense,
net for Fiscal 2019 increased compared to Fiscal 2018 primarily due to interest expense associated with incremental term loan
borrowings under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement of $265.6 million during Fiscal 2019, which were used to fund the Stevens
Pass and Triple Peaks acquisitions in August 2018 and September 2018, respectively, as well as an increase in variable interest
rates.
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans. Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans for Fiscal 2020 increased compared
to Fiscal 2019 and decreased for Fiscal 2019 as compared to Fiscal 2018 as a result of the Canadian dollar fluctuating relative to
the U.S. dollar, and was associated with an intercompany loan from Vail Holdings, Inc. to Whistler Blackcomb in the original
amount of $210.0 million that was funded, effective as of November 1, 2016, in connection with the acquisition of Whistler
Blackcomb. This intercompany loan, which had an outstanding balance of approximately $137.1 million as of July 31, 2020,
requires foreign currency remeasurement to Canadian dollars, the functional currency for Whistler Blackcomb. As a result, foreign
currency fluctuations associated with the loan are recorded within our results of operations.
(Provision) benefit from income taxes. Our effective tax rate was a (provision) benefit of (6.3%), (18.9%) and 18.0% in Fiscal
2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. Our tax (provision) benefit and effective tax rate are driven primarily by (i)
anticipated pre-tax book income for the full fiscal year, adjusted for items that are deductible/non-deductible for tax purposes only
54
(i.e., permanent items); (ii) excess tax benefits from employee share awards and enacted tax legislation, which are both recorded
as discrete items; (iii) taxable income generated by state and foreign jurisdictions that varies from the consolidated pre-tax book
income, (iv) the amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests and (v) discrete items. The decrease in the effective
tax rate provision during Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019 was primarily due to lower full year pre-tax net income, as well as
a one-time, provisional $3.8 million benefit related to NOL carryback provision of the CARES Act, partially offset by a decrease
in excess tax benefits from employee share awards that were exercised (stock appreciation rights) and that vested (restricted stock
awards), which are recorded within (provision) benefit from income taxes on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The increase in the effective tax rate provision during Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018 was primarily due to a
one-time, net tax benefit of $61.0 million recorded during Fiscal 2018 as a result of U.S. federal tax reform, which became effective
on January 1, 2018, as well as a reduction in excess tax benefits from employee share awards that were exercised (stock appreciation
awards) and that vested (restricted stock awards), which are recorded within (provision) benefit from income taxes on the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Excess tax benefits totaled $7.9 million, $12.9 million and $71.1 million for Fiscal 2020,
Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Act. The
Tax Act transitioned the U.S. tax system to a new territorial system and lowered the statutory federal corporate income tax rate
from 35% to 21%. The reduction of the statutory federal corporate tax rate to 21% became effective on January 1, 2018. As a
result of the Tax Act, we recorded a one-time, net tax benefit of $61.0 million on our Consolidated Statement of Operations during
Fiscal 2018. Due to the reduction in the federal corporate tax rate, we remeasured our U.S. net deferred tax liabilities as of the
effective date of the Tax Act using the reduced statutory federal corporate income tax rate. The U.S. net deferred tax liabilities
remeasurement resulted in a one-time tax benefit of $67.0 million, which was recognized as a discrete item and was recorded
within (provision) benefit from income taxes on our Consolidated Statement of Operations during Fiscal 2018. Also, in transitioning
to the new territorial tax system, the Tax Act requires us to include certain foreign earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries in our taxable
income. Such foreign earnings were subject to a one-time transition tax at the time of enactment of the Tax Act, which was $6.0
million and was recorded during Fiscal 2018.
Reconciliation of Segment Earnings
The following table reconciles net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. to Total Reported EBITDA for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019
and Fiscal 2018 (in thousands):
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income
Provision (benefit) from income taxes
Income before provision (benefit) from income taxes
Depreciation and amortization
Asset impairments
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets and other, net
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Investment income and other, net
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans
Interest expense, net
Total Reported EBITDA
Mountain Reported EBITDA
Lodging Reported EBITDA
Resort Reported EBITDA
Real Estate Reported EBITDA
Total Reported EBITDA
$
98,833
$
301,163
$
10,222
109,055
7,378
116,433
249,572
28,372
(838)
(2,964)
(1,305)
3,230
106,721
499,221
500,080
3,269
503,349
(4,128)
499,221
$
$
$
22,330
323,493
75,472
398,965
218,117
—
664
5,367
(3,086)
2,854
79,496
702,377
678,594
28,100
706,694
(4,317)
702,377
$
$
$
$
$
$
55
379,898
21,332
401,230
(61,138)
340,092
204,462
—
4,620
(1,854)
(1,944)
8,966
63,226
617,568
591,605
25,006
616,611
957
617,568
The following table reconciles long-term debt, net to Net Debt (defined as long-term debt, net plus long-term debt due within one
year less cash and cash equivalents) (in thousands):
Long-term debt, net
Long-term debt due within one year
Total debt
Less: cash and cash equivalents
Net Debt
Liquidity and Capital Resources
July 31,
2020
2019
2,387,122
$
1,527,744
63,677
2,450,799
390,980
2,059,819
$
48,516
1,576,260
108,850
1,467,410
$
$
Changes in significant sources and uses of cash for Fiscal 2020, Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018 are presented by categories as
follows (in thousands):
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
$
$
394,950 $
(492,739) $
376,233 $
634,231 $
(596,034) $
(99,558) $
548,486
(134,579)
(350,715)
Historically, we have lower cash available at the end of each first and fourth fiscal quarter-end as compared to our second and
third fiscal quarter-ends, primarily due to the seasonality of our Mountain segment operations, although our available cash balance
as of July 31, 2020 is higher than our historical July 31 balance as a result of proceeds reflected in the net cash provided by
financing activities for fiscal 2020 from the Notes offering, as discussed further below.
Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019
We generated $395.0 million of cash from operating activities during Fiscal 2020, a decrease of $239.3 million when compared
to $634.2 million of cash generated during Fiscal 2019. The decrease in operating cash flows was primarily a result of decreased
Mountain and Lodging segment operating results in Fiscal 2020, primarily due to the Resort Closures; a decrease in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities due to declines associated with the Resort Closures (excluding accounts payable and accrued
liabilities assumed through acquisitions) and an increase in cash interest payments of approximately $17.5 million primarily
associated with debt assumed in the Peak Resorts acquisition and incremental term loan and revolver borrowings under our Vail
Holdings Credit Agreement. These decreases were partially offset by increased North American pass product sales and receivable
collections for the 2019/2020 North American ski season as compared to the prior year and a decrease in estimated tax payments
of $23.1 million. Additionally we generated approximately $4.4 million of proceeds from real estate development land parcel sales
in Fiscal 2020 compared to $0.1 million in proceeds from real estate development project closings that occurred in the prior year.
Cash used in investing activities for Fiscal 2020 decreased by $103.3 million, primarily due to cash payments of $327.6 million,
net of cash acquired, related to the acquisition of Peak Resorts during Fiscal 2020, as compared to cash payments of $419.0 million,
net of cash acquired, related to the acquisitions of Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham during Fiscal 2019.
Additionally, capital expenditures decreased by $19.7 million primarily as a result of actions associated with the deferral of
discretionary capital projects related to the Company’s decision to prioritize near-term liquidity.
Cash provided by financing activities increased by $475.8 million during Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019, primarily due to
(i) the $600.0 million issuance of the Notes in Fiscal 2020; (ii) an increase in proceeds from incremental borrowings under the
term loan portion of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement from $265.5 million during Fiscal 2019, which were used to fund the
Triple Peaks and Stevens Pass acquisitions, to $335.6 million during Fiscal 2020, which were used to fund the Peak Resorts
acquisition; (iii) an increase in net borrowings under the revolver component of our Whistler Credit Agreement of $24.1 million,
primarily relating to funds which were drawn as a precautionary measure in order to increase our cash position and financial
flexibility in light of the financial market conditions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic; (iv) a decrease in repurchases of
common stock of $38.6 million; and (v) a decrease in dividend payments of $47.8 million associated with the Company’s decision
to prioritize near-term liquidity. These increases in cash provided by financing activities were partially offset by (i) an increase in
net payments on borrowings under the revolver component of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement of $286.0 million; (ii) an
56
increase in financing cost payments of $8.8 million, primarily associated with the issuance of the Notes; and (iii) a payment for
contingent consideration with regard to our lease for Park City.
Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018
We generated $634.2 million of cash from operating activities during Fiscal 2019, an increase of $85.7 million when compared
to $548.5 million of cash generated during Fiscal 2018. The increase in operating cash flows was primarily a result of improved
Mountain segment operating results in Fiscal 2019, including operating benefits from the acquisitions of Triple Peaks, Stevens
Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham, as compared to Fiscal 2018. Additionally, the increase in operating cash flows was a result of an
increase in accounts payable. These increases were partially offset by an increase in cash interest payments during Fiscal 2019
primarily associated with incremental term loan borrowings under our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and an increase in estimated
foreign tax payments.
Cash used in investing activities for Fiscal 2019 increased by $461.5 million, primarily due to cash payments of $419.0 million,
net of cash acquired, related to the acquisitions of Triple Peaks, Stevens Pass, Falls Creek and Hotham during Fiscal 2019 as well
as an increase in capital expenditures of $51.4 million during Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018.
Cash used in financing activities decreased $251.2 million during Fiscal 2019 compared to Fiscal 2018, primarily due to proceeds
from incremental borrowings under the term loan portion of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement of $265.6 million during Fiscal
2019, which was used to fund the Triple Peaks and Stevens Pass acquisitions. In addition, cash used in financing activities benefited
from (i) a reduction of $76.8 million for employee taxes related to exercises of share awards, (ii) a reduction of $26.9 million in
net payments on borrowings under our Whistler Credit Agreement and (iii) $11.2 million of proceeds related to real estate sales
transactions completed during Fiscal 2019, that are reflected as financing arrangements. These decreases in cash used in financing
activities were partially offset by an increase in repurchases of common stock of $59.2 million, an increase in dividends paid of
$56.4 million and payments for commitments in conjunction with the Canyons transaction of $9.5 million.
Significant Sources of Cash
We had $391.0 million of cash and cash equivalents as of July 31, 2020, compared to $108.9 million as of July 31, 2019. We
generated $395.0 million of cash from operating activities during Fiscal 2020 compared to $634.2 million and $548.5 million
generated during Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively, with the decrease in Fiscal 2020 primarily resulting from operational
impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the Resort Closures. Although we cannot predict the future impact associated with
the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, we currently anticipate that our Mountain and Lodging segment operating results will
continue to provide a significant source of future operating cash flows (primarily generated in our second and third fiscal quarters).
In addition to our $391.0 million of cash and cash equivalents at July 31, 2020, we had $418.8 million available under the revolver
component of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement as of July 31, 2020 (which represents the total commitment of $500.0 million
less certain letters of credit outstanding of $81.2 million). Also, to further support the liquidity needs of Whistler Blackcomb, we
had C$221.1 million ($165.1 million) available under the revolver component of our Whistler Credit Agreement (which represents
the total commitment of C$300.0 million ($224.0 million) less outstanding borrowings of C$78.0 million ($58.2 million) and a
letter of credit outstanding of C$0.9 million ($0.7 million)). We believe that our liquidity needs in the near term will be met by
our existing cash and cash equivalents, availability under our credit agreements and the expected positive cash flow from operating
activities of our Mountain and Lodging segments less resort capital expenditures, which we expect will provide us with sufficient
liquidity to fund our operations through at least the 2021/2022 ski season, even in the event of extended resort shutdowns. The
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and the Whistler Credit Agreement provide adequate flexibility and are priced favorably with
any new borrowings currently priced at LIBOR plus 2.5% and Bankers Acceptance Rate plus 1.75%, respectively.
Significant Uses of Cash
Capital Expenditures
We have historically invested significant amounts of cash in capital expenditures for our resort operations, and we expect to
continue to do so, subject to operating performance particularly as it relates to discretionary projects. On April 1, 2020, we
announced that we would be reducing our capital plan for calendar 2020 as compared to our previously issued guidance by
approximately $80 million to $85 million, with the vast majority of these savings coming from the deferral of many of our
discretionary capital projects. We are planning to defer all new chair lifts, terrain expansions and other mountain base area
improvements, while continuing the vast majority of our maintenance capital spending. Accordingly we now anticipate that we
will spend approximately $125 million to $130 million on resort capital expenditures during calendar year 2020. In addition, we
may incur capital expenditures for retained ownership interests associated with third-party real estate development projects. Normal
discretionary capital expenditures primarily include investments that will allow us to maintain our high-quality standards, as well
57
as certain incremental discretionary improvements at our Resorts, throughout our owned hotels, and in technology that can impact
the full network. We evaluate additional discretionary capital improvements based on an expected level of return on investment.
Approximately $51 million was spent for capital expenditures in calendar year 2020 as of July 31, 2020, leaving approximately
$74 million to $79 million to spend in the remainder of calendar year 2020. We currently plan to utilize cash on hand, borrowings
available under our credit agreements and/or cash flow generated from future operations to provide the cash necessary to complete
our capital plans.
Pursuant to the Third Amendment and discussed further below, we are prohibited, during the Financial Covenants Temporary
Waiver Period, from making capital expenditures in excess of $200.0 million per twelve-month period ending January 31, other
than non-recurring extraordinary capital expenditures incurred in connection with emergency repairs, life safety repairs, or ordinary
course maintenance repairs.
Acquisition of Peak Resorts
On September 23, 2019, we entered into an amendment to our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement in which we incurred additional
term loans of approximately $335.6 million, and we utilized the proceeds to fund the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding stock
of Peak Resorts on September 24, 2019 at a purchase price of $11.00 per share or approximately $264.5 million, and to prepay
certain portions of Peak Resorts’ outstanding debt and lease obligations that were required to be repaid in order to complete the
transaction.
Debt
As of July 31, 2020, principal payments on the majority of our long-term debt ($2.1 billion of the total $2.4 billion debt outstanding
as of July 31, 2020) are not due until fiscal year 2025 and beyond. As of July 31, 2020 and 2019, total long-term debt, net (including
long-term debt due within one year) was $2,450.8 million and $1,576.3 million, respectively. Net Debt (defined as long-term debt,
net plus long-term debt due within one year less cash and cash equivalents) increased from $1,467.4 million as of July 31, 2019
to $2,059.8 million as of July 31, 2020, primarily as a result of $335.6 million in incremental term loans, as discussed above,
resulting from the September 23, 2019 amendment of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and the assumption of certain debt
obligations of Peak Resorts, which have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2036 and were recorded at their estimated fair
values of approximately $184.7 million. See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On April 28, 2020, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we entered into the Third Amendment. Pursuant to the Third Amendment,
among other terms, we are exempt from complying with the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement’s maximum leverage ratio and
minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance covenants for the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, after
which we will again be required to comply with such covenants starting with the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2022 (or such
earlier fiscal quarter as elected by us). After the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period:
•
the maximum leverage ratio permitted under the maximum leverage ratio financial maintenance covenant reduces each quarter
after the expiration of the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period as follows:
(A) first full fiscal quarter: 6.25 to 1.00;
(B) second full fiscal quarter: 5.75 to 1.00;
(C) third full fiscal quarter: 5.25 to 1.00; and
(D) fourth full fiscal quarter and for each fiscal quarter thereafter: 5.00 to 1.00.
•
the minimum interest coverage ratio permitted under the minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance covenant
will be 2.00 to 1.00.
In addition, we are required to comply with a monthly minimum liquidity test (liquidity is defined as unrestricted cash and temporary
cash investments of VRI and its restricted subsidiaries and available commitments under our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement
revolver) of not less than $150.0 million, during the period that began on July 31, 2020 and ending on the date we deliver a
compliance certificate for the Company and its subsidiaries’ first fiscal quarter following the end of the Financial Covenants
Temporary Waiver Period.
We are also prohibited from the following activities during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period (unless approval
is obtained by a majority of the lenders under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement):
• paying any dividends or making share repurchases, unless (x) no default or potential default exists under the Vail Holdings
Credit Agreement and (y) the Company has liquidity (as defined above) of at least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount
58
of dividends paid and share repurchases made by the Company during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period
may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter;
• making capital expenditures in excess of $200.0 million per 12-month period ending January 31, other than non-recurring
extraordinary capital expenditures incurred in connection with emergency repairs, life safety repairs or ordinary course
maintenance repairs;
•
incurring any indebtedness secured by the collateral under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement other than pursuant to the
existing revolving commitments under the Credit Agreement;
• making non-ordinary course investments in unrestricted subsidiaries unless the Company has liquidity (as defined above) of
at least $300.0 million;
• making investments in non-subsidiaries in excess of $50.0 million in the aggregate; and
• acquiring all or a majority of the capital stock or all or any substantial portion of the assets of any entity or merging or
consolidating with another entity.
During the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, borrowings under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, including the
term loan facility, bears interest annually at LIBOR plus 2.50% and, for amounts in excess of $400.0 million, LIBOR is subject
to a floor of 0.75%. In addition, pursuant to the Third Amendment, the amount by which we are able to increase availability (under
the revolver or in the form of term loans) was increased to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the greater of (i) $2.25
billion and (ii) the product of 3.25 and the trailing four-quarter Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement).
On May 4, 2020, we completed our offering of $600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% senior notes due 2025 at par
(the “Notes”). The Notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company and are guaranteed by certain of our domestic
subsidiaries. A portion of the net proceeds was utilized to pay down the outstanding balance of the revolver component of our Vail
Holdings Credit Agreement in its entirety (which will continue to be available to the Company to borrow including throughout
the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period) and to pay the fees and expenses associated with the offering, with the remaining
proceeds intended to be used for general corporate purposes. We will pay interest on the Notes on May 15 and November 15 of
each year commencing on November 15, 2020. The Notes will mature on May 15, 2025. The Notes are redeemable, in whole or
in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2022 at the redemption prices specified in an Indenture dated as of May 4, 2020 (the
“Indenture”) plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to May 15, 2022, we may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption
price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, plus a “make-whole” premium as specified in the Indenture.
In addition, prior to May 15, 2022, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes with an amount not
to exceed the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at the redemption price of 106.25% of the principal amount of the
notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Notes rank equally in right of payment with existing and future senior
indebtedness of the Company and the guarantors (as defined in the Indenture).
The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company and the guarantors of the Notes to
incur liens on assets; merge or consolidate with another company or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of
all or substantially all of the Company’s assets or engage in Sale and Leaseback Transactions (as defined in the Indenture). The
Indenture does not contain any financial maintenance covenants. Certain of the covenants will not apply to the Notes so long as
the Notes have investment grade ratings from two specified rating agencies and no event of default has occurred and is continuing
under the Indenture. The Indenture includes customary events of default, including failure to make payment, failure to comply
with the obligations set forth in the Indenture, certain defaults on certain other indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency
or reorganization, and invalidity of the guarantees of the Notes issued pursuant to the Indenture.
The Indenture requires that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in the Indenture), the Company shall offer to
purchase all of the outstanding Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes,
plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Company or certain of its subsidiaries dispose of assets, under certain circumstances, the
Company will be required to either invest the net cash proceeds from such assets sales in its business within a specified period of
time, repay certain senior secured debt or debt of its non-guarantor subsidiaries, or make an offer to purchase a principal amount
of the Notes equal to the excess net cash proceeds at a purchase price of 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The Vail Holdings Credit Agreement provides for (i) a revolving loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million
and (ii) a term loan facility of $1.25 billion. We expect that our liquidity needs in the near term will be met by continued use of
operating cash flows and borrowings under the Notes, the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and the Whistler Credit Agreement.
59
Our debt service requirements can be impacted by changing interest rates as we had approximately $0.9 billion of net variable-
rate debt outstanding as of July 31, 2020, after consideration of $400.0 million in interest rate swaps which convert variable-rate
debt to fixed-rate debt. A 100-basis point change in LIBOR would cause our annual interest payments on our net variable-rate
debt to change by approximately $9.1 million. Additionally, the annual payments associated with the financing of the Canyons
transaction increase by the greater of CPI less 1%, or 2%. The fluctuation in our debt service requirements, in addition to interest
rate and inflation changes, may be impacted by future borrowings under our credit agreements or other alternative financing
arrangements we may enter into. Our long term liquidity needs depend upon operating results that impact the borrowing capacity
under our credit agreements, which can be mitigated by adjustments to capital expenditures, the flexibility of investment activities
and the ability to obtain favorable future financing. We can respond to liquidity impacts of changes in the business and economic
environment, including the COVID-19 pandemic, by managing our capital expenditures, variable operating expenses, the timing
of new real estate development activity and the payment of cash dividends on our common stock.
Share Repurchase Program
Our share repurchase program is conducted under authorizations made from time to time by our Board of Directors. On March 6,
2006, our Board of Directors initially authorized the repurchase of up to 3,000,000 shares of Vail Resorts common stock (“Vail
Shares”) and later authorized additional repurchases of up to 3,000,000 additional Vail Shares (July 16, 2008) and 1,500,000 Vail
Shares (December 4, 2015), for a total authorization to repurchase shares of up to 7,500,000 Vail Shares. During Fiscal 2020, we
repurchased 256,418 Vail shares at a cost of $46.4 million. Since the inception of this stock repurchase program through July 31,
2020, we have repurchased 6,161,141 Vail Shares at a cost of approximately $404.4 million. As of July 31, 2020, 1,338,859 Vail
Shares remained available to repurchase under the existing repurchase authorization. Pursuant to the Third Amendment and as
discussed above, we are prohibited from repurchasing shares of common stock during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver
Period unless (x) no default or potential default exists under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and (y) the Company has liquidity
(as defined above) of at least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid and share repurchases made by the
Company during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter. Vail Shares
purchased pursuant to the repurchase program will be held as treasury shares and may be used for the issuance of shares under
the Company’s share award plan. Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time at prevailing prices as permitted
by applicable laws, and subject to market conditions and other factors. The timing, as well as the number of Vail Shares that may
be repurchased under the program, will depend on several factors, including our future financial performance, our available cash
resources and competing uses for cash that may arise in the future, the restrictions in our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, prevailing
prices of Vail Shares and the number of Vail Shares that become available for sale at prices that we believe are attractive. The
share repurchase program has no expiration date.
Dividend Payments
We announced on April 1, 2020 that we would be suspending the declaration of our quarterly dividend for at least the next two
quarters in response to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently, pursuant to the Third Amendment and as discussed
above, we are prohibited from paying any dividends during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period unless (x) no default
or potential default exists under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement and (y) the Company has liquidity (as defined above) of at
least $400.0 million, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid and share repurchases made by the Company during the Financial
Covenants Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter. For the year ended July 31, 2020, we
paid cash dividends of $5.28 per share ($212.7 million in the aggregate). These dividends were funded through available cash on
hand and borrowings under the revolving portion of our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement. The amount, if any, of the dividends to
be paid in the future will depend on our available cash on hand, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, restrictions
contained in our Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other factors considered
relevant by our Board of Directors.
60
Covenants and Limitations
We must abide by certain restrictive financial covenants under our credit agreements. The most restrictive of those covenants
include the following covenants: for the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, Net Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and the
Interest Coverage ratio (each as defined in the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement); for the Whistler Credit Agreement, Consolidated
Total Leverage Ratio and Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio (each as defined in the Whistler Credit Agreement); and for the
EPR Secured Notes, Maximum Leverage Ratio and Consolidated Fixed Charge Ratio (each as defined in the EPR Agreements).
In addition, our financing arrangements limit our ability to make certain restricted payments, pay dividends on or redeem or
repurchase stock, make certain investments, make certain affiliate transfers and may limit our ability to enter into certain mergers,
consolidations or sales of assets and incur certain indebtedness. Our borrowing availability under the Vail Holdings Credit
Agreement is primarily determined by the Net Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio, which is based on our segment operating
performance, as defined in the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement. Our borrowing availability under the Whistler Credit Agreement
is primarily determined based on the commitment size of the credit facility and our compliance with the terms of the Whistler
Credit Agreement.
Pursuant to the Third Amendment and as discussed above in further detail, we are exempt from complying with the restrictive
covenants of the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, but are required to
comply with a monthly minimum liquidity test during such period.
We were in compliance with all restrictive financial covenants in our debt instruments as of July 31, 2020. We expect that we will
continue to meet all applicable financial maintenance covenants in effect in our credit agreements throughout the year ending
July 31, 2021. However, there can be no assurance that we will continue to meet such financial covenants. If such covenants are
not met, we would be required to seek a waiver or amendment from the banks participating in our credit agreements. There can
be no assurance that such waiver or amendment would be granted, which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity.
Contractual Obligations
As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as
debt agreements, lease agreements and construction agreements in conjunction with our resort capital expenditures. Debt
obligations, which totaled $2.4 billion as of July 31, 2020, are recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Obligations under construction contracts are not recognized as liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet until services and/or
goods are received which is in accordance with GAAP. A summary of our contractual obligations as of July 31, 2020 is presented
below (in thousands):
Contractual Obligations
Long-Term Debt (Outstanding Principal) (1) $
Fixed Rate Interest (1)
Canyons Obligation (2)
Operating Leases and Service Contracts (3)
Purchase Obligations and Other (4)
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
$
Total
2,444,248
414,370
1,577,790
363,283
440,387
5,240,078
$
$
Payments Due by Period
Fiscal
2021
2-3
years
4-5
years
More than
5 years
69,827
56,517
28,827
68,419
336,666
560,256
$
$
178,935
112,736
59,395
90,527
87,069
528,662
$ 1,675,916
108,268
61,795
66,836
432
$ 1,913,247
$
$
519,570
136,849
1,427,773
137,501
16,220
2,237,913
(1) The fixed-rate interest payments (including payments that are required under interest rate swaps that we have entered
into) as well as long-term debt payments, included in the table above, assume that all debt outstanding as of July 31, 2020
will be held to maturity. Interest payments associated with variable-rate debt have not been included in the table. Assuming
that our approximately $0.9 billion of variable-rate long-term debt as of July 31, 2020 is held to maturity and utilizing interest
rates in effect at July 31, 2020, our annual interest payments (including commitment fees and letter of credit fees) on variable
rate long-term debt as of July 31, 2020 is anticipated to be approximately $24.4 million for Fiscal 2021, approximately $22.7
million for Fiscal 2022 and approximately $14.9 million for at least each of the next three years subsequent to Fiscal 2022.
The future annual interest obligations noted herein are estimated only in relation to debt outstanding as of July 31, 2020 and
do not reflect interest obligations on potential future debt.
Included in Long-Term Debt (Outstanding Principal) are $11.2 million of proceeds resulting from real estate transactions
accounted for as a financing arrangements. Fiscal 2021 payments shown above include approximately $6.2 million of proceeds,
which are expected to be recognized on the Company’s Statement of Operations during the year ending July 31, 2021 as a
61
result of the anticipated resolution of continuing involvement, with no associated cash outflow (see Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information).
(2) Reflects principal and interest expense payments associated with the remaining lease term of the Canyons obligation,
initially 50 years, assuming a 2% per annum (floor) increase in payments. Any potential increases to the annual fixed payment
above the 2% floor due to inflation linked index of CPI less 1% have been excluded.
(3) The payments under noncancelable operating leases included in the table above reflect the applicable minimum lease
payments and exclude any potential contingent rent payments.
(4) Purchase obligations and other primarily include amounts which are classified as trade payables ($59.7 million), accrued
payroll and benefits ($69.3 million), accrued fees and assessments ($26.1 million), contingent consideration liability ($17.8
million), and accrued taxes (including taxes for uncertain tax positions) ($117.2 million) on our Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of July 31, 2020; and, other commitments for goods and services not yet received, including construction contracts and
minimum commitments under season pass alliance agreements, not included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31,
2020 in accordance with GAAP.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have off balance sheet transactions that are expected to have a material effect on our financial condition, revenue,
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to select appropriate accounting
policies and to make judgments and estimates affecting the application of those accounting policies. In applying our accounting
policies, different business conditions or the use of different assumptions may result in materially different amounts reported in
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We have identified the most critical accounting policies which were determined by considering accounting policies that involve
the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. We also have other policies considered key accounting policies; however,
these policies do not meet the definition of critical accounting policies because they do not generally require us to make estimates
or judgments that are complex or subjective. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with our
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Description
The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for possible impairment on an annual basis or
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the estimated fair value
of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value. Other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment
only when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be
recoverable.
62
Judgments and Uncertainties
Application of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test requires judgment, including the identification
of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units and determination
of the estimated fair value of reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We perform a qualitative analysis to determine
whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds the carrying
amount. If it is determined, based on qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset
may be more likely than not less than carrying amount, or if significant changes to macro-economic factors related to the reporting
unit or intangible asset have occurred that could materially impact fair value, a quantitative impairment test would be required,
in which we would determine the estimated fair value of our reporting units using a discounted cash flow analysis and determine
the estimated fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily using the income approach based upon estimated future
revenue streams. These analyses require significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on
internal forecasts, available industry/market data (to the extent available), estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our
business including expectations and assumptions regarding the impact of general economic conditions on our business, estimation
of the useful life over which cash flows will occur (including terminal multiples), determination of the respective weighted average
cost of capital and market participant assumptions. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the
determination of estimated fair value and impairment for each reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset. We evaluate our
reporting units on an annual basis and allocate goodwill to our reporting units based on the reporting units expected to benefit
from the acquisition generating the goodwill.
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually as of May 1. As a result of the coronavirus
(COVID-19) pandemic and the impact it has had on our operations during Fiscal 2020, and the expected continuing impact of the
pandemic on future operations, we determined that it was appropriate to test certain assets within our Colorado resort ground
transportation company for impairment. Our testing for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment consists of a
comparison of the estimated fair value of those assets with their net carrying values. If the net carrying value of the assets exceed
their estimated fair value, an impairment will be recognized for indefinite-lived intangibles, including goodwill, in an amount
equal to that excess; otherwise, no impairment loss is recognized. We recorded an impairment of approximately $28.4 million
related to our Colorado resort ground transportation company during Fiscal 2020, which was recorded within asset impairments
on our Consolidated Statement of Operations, with corresponding reductions to goodwill, net of $25.7 million and to intangible
assets, net and property, plant and equipment, net of $2.7 million. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information. As of July 31, 2020, we determined that no other impairment of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets existed.
Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors. As
a result, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test
will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future. Examples of events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to
negatively affect the underlying key assumptions and ultimately impact the estimated fair value of our reporting units may include
such items as: (1) prolonged adverse weather conditions resulting in a sustained decline in guest visitation; (2) a prolonged weakness
in the general economic conditions in which guest visitation and spending is adversely impacted (particularly with regard to the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic); and (3) volatility in the equity and debt markets which could result in a higher discount rate.
While historical performance and current expectations have resulted in estimated fair values of our reporting units in excess of
carrying values (with the exception of our Colorado resort ground transportation company, as discussed above), if our assumptions
are not realized, it is possible that an additional impairment charge may need to be recorded in the future. However, it is not possible
at this time to determine if an impairment charge would result or if such a charge would be material. As of July 31, 2020, we had
$1,709.0 million of goodwill and $247.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
There can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment tests for
goodwill will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future.
63
Tax Contingencies
Description
We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates
and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits and deductions and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities,
which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes, as well
as the interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations, including those enacted under the Tax Act. We recognize liabilities for
uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if
the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the largest tax
benefit that is cumulatively greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective
to estimate such amounts, as this requires us to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. This evaluation is based
on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, interpretation of tax law, effectively
settled issues under audit and new audit activity. A significant amount of time may pass before a particular matter, for which we
may have established a reserve, is audited and fully resolved.
Judgments and Uncertainties
The estimates of our tax contingencies reserve contain uncertainty because management must use judgment to estimate the potential
exposure associated with our various filing positions.
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
We believe the estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable and we have adequate reserves for our tax contingencies
for uncertain tax positions. Our reserves for uncertain tax positions, including any income tax related interest and penalties ($76.5
million as of July 31, 2020), relate to the treatment of the Canyons obligation lease payments as payments of debt obligations and
that the tax basis in Canyons goodwill is deductible. Actual results could differ and we may be exposed to increases or decreases
in those reserves and tax provisions that could be material.
An unfavorable tax settlement could require the use of cash and could possibly result in increased tax expense and effective tax
rate and/or adjustments to our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities in the year of resolution. A favorable tax settlement
could possibly result in a reduction in our tax expense, effective tax rate, income taxes payable, other long-term liabilities and/or
adjustments to our deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities in the year of settlement or in future years.
Depreciable Lives of Assets
Description
Mountain and lodging operational assets, furniture and fixtures, computer equipment, software, vehicles and leasehold
improvements are primarily depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. Assets may
become obsolete or require replacement before the end of their useful life in which the remaining book value would be written-
off or we could incur costs to remove or dispose of assets no longer in use.
Judgments and Uncertainties
The estimates of our useful lives of the assets contain uncertainty because management must use judgment to estimate the useful
life of the asset.
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Although we believe the estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be
exposed to increased expense related to depreciable assets disposed of, removed or taken out of service prior to its originally
estimated useful life, which may be material. A 10% decrease in the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets would have
increased depreciation expense by approximately $24.9 million for Fiscal 2020.
64
Business Combinations
Description
A component of our growth strategy has been to acquire and integrate businesses that complement our existing operations. We
account for business combinations in accordance with the guidance for business combinations and related literature. Accordingly,
we allocate the purchase price of acquired businesses to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The difference between the purchase price and the
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired or the excess of the aggregate estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed is recorded as goodwill. In determining the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination, we use various recognized valuation methods including present value modeling and referenced market values (where
available). Valuations are performed by management or independent valuation specialists under management’s supervision, where
appropriate.
Judgments and Uncertainties
Accounting for business combinations requires our management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially at the
acquisition date, including our estimates for intangible assets, contractual obligations assumed and contingent consideration, where
applicable. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate,
they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are
inherently uncertain. Examples of critical estimates in valuing certain of the intangible assets we have acquired include but are
not limited to determination of weighted average cost of capital, market participant assumptions, royalty rates, terminal multiples
and estimates of future cash flows to be generated by the acquired assets. In addition to the estimates and assumptions applied to
valuing intangible assets acquired, the determination of the estimated fair value of contingent consideration, including estimating
the likelihood and timing of achieving the relevant thresholds for contingent consideration payments, requires the use of subjective
judgments. We estimate the fair value of the Park City contingent consideration payments using an option pricing valuation model
which incorporates, among other factors, projected achievement of specified financial performance measures, discounts rates and
volatility for the respective business.
Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
We believe that the estimated fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on reasonable assumptions
that a marketplace participant would use. While we use our best estimates and assumptions to accurately value assets acquired
and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, our estimates are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during
the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final
determination of the estimated fair values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent
adjustments would be recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We recognize the fair value of contingent consideration at the date of acquisition as part of the consideration transferred to acquire
a business. The liability associated with contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value at each reporting period subsequent
to the date of acquisition taking into consideration changes in financial projections and long-term growth rates, among other
factors, that may impact the timing and amount of contingent consideration payments until the term of the agreement has expired
or the contingency is resolved. Increases in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded as losses in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations, while decreases in fair value are recorded as gains.
New Accounting Standards
Refer to the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies within the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion
of new accounting standards.
Inflation
Although we cannot accurately determine the precise effect of inflation on our operations, management does not believe inflation
has had a material effect on the results of operations in the last three fiscal years. When the costs of operating resorts increase, we
generally have been able to pass the increase on to our customers. However, there can be no assurance that increases in labor and
other operating costs due to inflation will not have an impact on our future profitability.
In May 2013, we entered into a long-term lease pursuant to which we assumed the operations of Canyons which includes the ski
terrain and related amenities. The lease has an initial term of 50 years with six 50-year renewal options. The lease provides for
$25.0 million in annual payments, which increase each year by an inflation linked index of CPI less 1%, with a floor of 2% per
65
annum. As lease payments increase annually, there can be no assurance that these increases will be offset by increased cash flow
generated from operations at Park City.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results
Our mountain and lodging operations are seasonal in nature. In particular, revenue and profits for our North America mountain
and most of our lodging operations are substantially lower and historically result in losses from late spring to late fall. Conversely,
peak operating seasons for our NPS concessionaire properties, our mountain resort golf courses and our Australian resorts’ ski
season generally occur during the North American summer months while the North American winter months result in operating
losses. Revenue and profits generated by NPS concessionaire properties summer operations, golf operations and Australian resorts’
ski operations are not sufficient to fully offset our off-season losses from our North American mountain and other lodging operations.
During Fiscal 2020, there were several interruptions to our normal North American and Australian ski seasons as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in early resort closures. During Fiscal 2020, approximately 83% of total combined Mountain
and Lodging segment net revenue (excluding Lodging segment revenue associated with reimbursement of payroll costs) was
earned during the second and third fiscal quarters. Therefore, the operating results for any three-month period are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be achieved for any subsequent quarter or for a full year (see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements).
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk is limited primarily to the fluctuating interest rates associated with variable rate
indebtedness. At July 31, 2020, we had approximately $0.9 billion of net variable rate indebtedness (after taking into consideration
$400.0 million in interest rate swaps which converts variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt), representing approximately 37% of our
total debt outstanding, at an average interest rate during Fiscal 2020 of approximately 3.8%. Based on variable-rate borrowings
outstanding as of July 31, 2020, a 100-basis point (or 1.0%) change in LIBOR would result in our annual interest payments on
our net variable-rate debt changing by $9.1 million. Our market risk exposure fluctuates based on changes in underlying interest
rates.
During the year ended July 31, 2020, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rate on a portion of our Vail
Holdings Credit Agreement, which has the effect of fixing the underlying floating interest rate component of $400.0 million of
the principal amount outstanding at an effective rate of 1.46%.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. We are exposed to currency translation risk because the results of our international entities
are reported in local currency, which we then translate to U.S. dollars for inclusion in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As
a result, changes between the foreign exchange rates, in particular the Canadian dollar and Australian dollar compared to the U.S.
dollar, affect the amounts we record for our foreign assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and could have a negative effect on
our financial results. Additionally, we have foreign currency transaction exposure from an intercompany loan to Whistler
Blackcomb that is not deemed to be permanently invested, which has and could materially change due to fluctuations in the
Canadian dollar exchange rate. The results of Whistler Blackcomb and our Australian ski areas are reported in Canadian dollars
and Australian dollars respectively, which we then translate to U.S. dollars for inclusion in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We do not currently enter into hedging arrangements to minimize the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our operations.
The following table summarizes the amounts of foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, representing losses and foreign
currency loss on intercompany loans recognized in comprehensive income (in thousands):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans
$
$
(9,075) $
(3,230) $
(34,287) $
(2,854) $
(61,957)
(8,966)
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
66
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
68
69
72
73
74
75
76
77
67
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of Vail Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the
risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in 2013. Based on this assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2020, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective. Management’s evaluation and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2020 excluded certain elements of internal controls of Peak Resorts (acquired in September 2019)
due to the timing of this acquisition. Those elements of the acquired resorts’ internal controls over financial reporting that have
been excluded represent less than 1% of total consolidated assets and approximately 8% of total consolidated net revenues of the
Company as of and for the year ended July 31, 2020.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued an attestation report on
the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2020, as stated in the Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm on the following page.
68
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Vail Resorts, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vail Resorts, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
July 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity
and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2020, including the related notes (collectively referred
to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
July 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of the Company as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended July 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31,
2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases
as of August 1, 2019.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our
audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether
due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement
of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.
Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits
also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded certain elements
of the internal control over financial reporting of Peak Resorts from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as
of July 31, 2020 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during September 2019. Subsequent
to the acquisition, certain elements of Peak Resorts’ internal control over financial reporting and related processes were integrated
into the Company’s existing systems and internal control over financial reporting. Those controls that were not integrated have
been excluded from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2020.
We have also excluded these elements of internal control over financial reporting of Peak Resorts from our audit of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. The excluded elements represent controls of less than 1% of consolidated assets and
approximately 8% of consolidated net revenues.
69
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or
disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or
complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on
the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Fair Value Measurement of the Contingent Consideration
As described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has established a liability of $17.8 million as of
July 31, 2020 for additional amounts that management believes are likely to be paid to the previous owner of Park City (the
“Contingent Consideration”). The Company remeasures the Contingent Consideration to fair value at each reporting date until
the contingency is resolved. The estimated fair value of Contingent Consideration includes the future period resort operations of
Park City in the calculation of EBITDA on which participating contingent payments are made, which is determined on the basis
of estimated performance for the years ending July 31, 2021 and July 31, 2022, escalated by an assumed long-term growth factor
and discounted to net present value. Fair value is estimated using an option pricing valuation model. As described by management,
key assumptions in determining the fair value under this model included Park City EBITDA for the year ending July 31, 2022, an
assumed long- term growth rate, discount rate and volatility.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value measurement of the
Contingent Consideration is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value
measurement, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and
evaluating audit evidence related to management’s significant assumptions for the Park City EBITDA for the year ending July 31,
2022, assumed long-term growth rate, discount rate, and volatility; and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with
specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall
opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to
management’s fair value measurement of the Contingent Consideration including controls over the Company’s significant
assumptions. The procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for developing the fair value measurement
and evaluating the significant assumptions used by management, related to the Park City EBITDA for the year ending July 31,
2022, assumed long-term growth rate, discount rate, and volatility. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the Park City
EBITDA for the year ending July 31, 2022, assumed long-term growth rate, discount rate, and volatility involved evaluating
whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past EBITDA performance of Park
City; (ii) the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the future EBITDA performance of Park City; (iii) the consistency with external
market data; and (iv) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals
with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s discount rate and volatility assumptions.
70
Acquisition of Peak Resorts - Valuation of Acquired Depreciable Property, Plant, and Equipment
As described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of Peak Resorts, Inc.
during the year ended July 31, 2020 resulting in the recognition of an aggregate amount of approximately $427.8 million related
to property, plant, and equipment. A substantial portion of the property, plant, and equipment acquired related to depreciable
property, plant, and equipment (“Acquired Depreciable PPE”). The process of estimating the fair value of the Acquired Depreciable
PPE includes the use of certain estimates and assumptions related to the determination of replacement cost.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of the Acquired Depreciable
PPE from the Peak Resorts acquisition is a critical audit matter are (i) the high degree of auditor subjectivity and effort in performing
procedures over management’s valuation of the Acquired Depreciable PPE including the significant assumptions related to the
replacement cost; and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall
opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the
acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s significant assumptions and data used in the valuation of the Acquired
Depreciable PPE. These procedures also included, among others, (i) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value
of Acquired Depreciable PPE; (ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used to estimate the fair value of
the Acquired Depreciable PPE; and (iii) evaluating management’s replacement cost assumptions used to estimate the fair value
of the Acquired Depreciable PPE. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the
Company’s valuation method and the Company’s replacement cost assumptions, including evaluating whether the assumptions
used by management were reasonable considering consistency with external market and industry data.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
September 24, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
71
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $2,484 and $724, respectively
Inventories, net of reserves of $4,447 and $2,031, respectively
Other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 8)
Real estate held for sale and investment
Goodwill, net (Note 8)
Intangible assets, net (Note 8)
Operating right-of-use assets (Note 4)
Deferred charges and other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 8)
Income taxes payable
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 6)
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt, net (Note 6)
Operating lease liabilities (Note 4)
Other long-term liabilities (Note 8)
Deferred income taxes, net (Note 11)
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 25,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized and 46,350 and 46,190
shares issued, respectively
Exchangeable shares, $0.01 par value, 36 and 56 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively (Note 5)
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Retained earnings
Treasury stock, at cost; 6,161 and 5,905 shares, respectively (Note 16)
Total Vail Resorts, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Noncontrolling interests
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
July 31,
2020
2019
$
$
$
$
390,980 $
11,106
106,664
101,856
54,482
665,088
2,192,679
96,844
1,709,020
314,776
225,744
40,081
5,244,232 $
499,108 $
40,680
63,677
603,465
2,387,122
217,542
270,245
234,191
3,712,565
—
464
—
1,131,624
(56,837)
645,902
(404,411)
1,316,742
214,925
1,531,667
5,244,232 $
108,850
9,539
270,896
96,539
42,116
527,940
1,842,500
101,021
1,608,206
306,173
—
40,237
4,426,077
607,857
62,760
48,516
719,133
1,527,744
—
283,601
168,759
2,699,237
—
461
1
1,130,083
(31,730)
759,801
(357,989)
1,500,627
226,213
1,726,840
4,426,077
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
72
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
Net revenue:
Mountain and Lodging services and other
Mountain and Lodging retail and dining
Resort net revenue
Real Estate
Total net revenue
Operating expense (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown separately below):
Mountain and Lodging operating expense
Mountain and Lodging retail and dining cost of products sold
General and administrative
Resort operating expense
Real Estate, net
Total segment operating expense
Other operating (expense) income:
Depreciation and amortization
Gain on sale of real property
Asset impairments (Notes 2 & 8)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration (Note 10)
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets and other, net
Income from operations
Interest expense, net
Mountain equity investment income, net
Investment income and other, net
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans (Note 6)
Income before (provision) benefit from income taxes
(Provision) benefit from income taxes (Note 11)
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Per share amounts (Note 5):
Basic net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Diluted net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Cash dividends declared per share
$
$
$
$
$
1,578,463 $
380,394
1,958,857
4,847
1,963,704
1,807,930 $
462,933
2,270,863
712
2,271,575
1,019,437
159,066
278,695
1,457,198
9,182
1,466,380
(249,572)
207
(28,372)
2,964
838
223,389
(106,721)
1,690
1,305
(3,230)
116,433
(7,378)
109,055
(10,222)
98,833 $
2.45 $
2.42 $
5.28 $
1,101,670
190,044
274,415
1,566,129
5,609
1,571,738
(218,117)
580
—
(5,367)
(664)
476,269
(79,496)
1,960
3,086
(2,854)
398,965
(75,472)
323,493
(22,330)
301,163 $
7.46 $
7.32 $
6.46 $
1,584,310
423,255
2,007,565
3,988
2,011,553
966,566
174,105
251,806
1,392,477
3,546
1,396,023
(204,462)
515
—
1,854
(4,620)
408,817
(63,226)
1,523
1,944
(8,966)
340,092
61,138
401,230
(21,332)
379,898
9.40
9.13
5.046
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
73
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax of $0, $0 and
$1,981, respectively)
Change in estimated fair value of hedging instruments
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
$
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
2020
$
109,055 $
323,493 $
401,230
(9,075)
(22,510)
77,470
(3,744)
73,726 $
(34,287)
—
289,206
(17,546)
271,660 $
(61,957)
—
339,273
(5,997)
333,276
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
74
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands, except share amounts)
Common Stock
Vail Resorts Exchangeable
Additional
Paid in
Capital
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Total Vail Resorts,
Inc. Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
$
454 $
1 $ 1,222,510 $
44,395 $ 550,985 $(247,189) $
1,571,156 $
227,803 $
1,798,959
Balance, July 31, 2017
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Total comprehensive income
Stock-based compensation (Note 17)
Measurement period adjustment
Issuance of shares under share award plan, net of shares withheld for
employee taxes (Note 17)
Repurchases of common stock (Note 16)
Dividends (Note 5)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net
Balance, July 31, 2018
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Total comprehensive income
Stock-based compensation (Note 17)
Cumulative effect for adoption of revenue standard
Issuance of shares under share award plan, net of shares withheld for
employee taxes (Note 17)
Repurchases of common stock (Note 16)
Dividends (Note 5)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net
Balance, July 31, 2019
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
Change in estimated fair value of hedging instruments
Total comprehensive income
Stock-based compensation (Note 17)
Issuance of shares under share award plan, net of shares withheld for
employee taxes (Note 17)
Exchangeable share transfers
Repurchases of common stock (Note 16)
Dividends (Note 5)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
—
460
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
461
—
—
—
—
2
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
19,040
—
— (104,083)
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
(1)
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,137,467
—
—
19,856
—
(27,240)
—
—
—
1,130,083
—
—
—
21,021
(19,480)
—
—
—
—
— 379,898
(46,622)
—
—
—
—
— (204,161)
— (25,800)
—
—
—
(2,227)
726,722
—
(272,989)
— 301,163
—
—
(7,517)
—
(29,503)
—
—
—
—
— (260,567)
— (85,000)
—
—
—
(31,730)
759,801
—
(357,989)
—
98,833
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,597)
(22,510)
—
—
—
—
—
—
— (46,422)
—
— (212,732)
—
—
(56,837) $ 645,902 $(404,411) $
—
379,898
(46,622)
333,276
19,040
—
(104,077)
(25,800)
(204,161)
—
1,589,434
301,163
(29,503)
271,660
19,856
(7,517)
(27,239)
(85,000)
(260,567)
—
1,500,627
98,833
(2,597)
(22,510)
73,726
21,021
(19,478)
—
(46,422)
(212,732)
—
1,316,742 $
21,332
(15,335)
5,997
—
(1,776)
—
—
—
(9,795)
222,229
22,330
(4,784)
17,546
—
—
—
—
—
(13,562)
226,213
10,222
(6,478)
—
3,744
—
—
—
—
—
(15,032)
214,925 $
401,230
(61,957)
339,273
19,040
(1,776)
(104,077)
(25,800)
(204,161)
(9,795)
1,811,663
323,493
(34,287)
289,206
19,856
(7,517)
(27,239)
(85,000)
(260,567)
(13,562)
1,726,840
109,055
(9,075)
(22,510)
77,470
21,021
(19,478)
—
(46,422)
(212,732)
(15,032)
1,531,667
Balance, July 31, 2020
$
464 $
— $ 1,131,624 $
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
109,055 $
323,493 $
401,230
Depreciation and amortization
Asset impairments
Cost of real estate sales
Stock-based compensation expense
Deferred income taxes, net
Canyons obligation accreted interest expense
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans
Gain on sale of real property
Other non-cash income, net
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories, net
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Deferred revenue
Income taxes payable - excess tax benefit from share award plans
Income taxes payable - other
Other assets and liabilities, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
Other investing activities, net
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowings under Vail Holdings Credit Agreement
Proceeds from borrowings under Whistler Credit Agreement
Proceeds from borrowings under 6.25% Notes
Repayments of borrowings under Vail Holdings Credit Agreement
Repayments of borrowings under Whistler Credit Agreement
Employee taxes paid for share award exercises
Repurchases of common stock
Dividends paid
Other financing activities, net
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:
Beginning of period
End of period
Cash paid for interest
Taxes paid, net
Non-cash investing activities:
Accrued capital expenditures
$
$
$
$
$
249,572
28,372
3,684
21,021
17,435
5,773
(2,964)
3,230
(207)
(16,674)
167,347
(1,924)
(82,394)
(98,003)
(8,236)
(4,951)
4,814
394,950
(172,334)
(327,555)
7,150
(492,739)
892,625
209,634
600,000
(811,875)
(204,032)
(19,478)
(46,422)
(212,732)
(31,487)
376,233
5,253
283,697
218,117
—
—
19,856
22,419
5,752
5,367
2,854
(580)
(13,875)
(35,406)
(7,274)
23,296
35,628
(12,932)
38,773
8,743
634,231
(192,035)
(419,044)
15,045
(596,034)
543,625
26,518
—
(235,625)
(45,060)
(27,239)
(85,000)
(260,567)
(16,210)
(99,558)
(5,290)
(66,651)
118,389 $
402,086 $
88,398 $
4,134 $
185,040 $
118,389 $
70,888 $
27,212 $
204,462
—
3,701
19,040
(45,770)
5,723
(1,854)
8,966
(515)
(13,784)
(44,261)
(963)
1,879
42,007
(71,077)
38,453
1,249
548,486
(140,611)
(1,356)
7,388
(134,579)
225,000
46,513
—
(182,500)
(91,941)
(104,077)
(25,800)
(204,161)
(13,749)
(350,715)
(5,814)
57,378
127,662
185,040
53,842
16,945
15,046 $
18,420 $
15,638
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
76
1.
Organization and Business
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Vail Resorts, Inc. (“Vail Resorts”) is organized as a holding company and operates through various subsidiaries. Vail Resorts and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) operate in three business segments: Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate. The
Company refers to “Resort” as the combination of the Mountain and Lodging segments.
In the Mountain segment, the Company operates the following 37 destination mountain resorts and regional ski areas:
*Denotes a destination mountain resort, which generally receives a meaningful portion of skier visits from long-distance travelers,
as opposed to the Company’s regional ski areas, which tend to generate skier visits predominantly from their respective local
markets.
Additionally, the Mountain segment includes ancillary services, primarily including ski school, dining and retail/rental operations,
and for the Company’s Australian ski areas, including lodging and transportation operations. Several of the resorts located in the
United States (“U.S.”) operate primarily on federal land under the terms of Special Use Permits granted by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture Forest Service. The operations of Whistler Blackcomb are conducted on land owned by the government of the
Province of British Columbia, Canada within the traditional territory of the Squamish and Lil’wat Nations. The operations of the
Company’s Australian ski areas are conducted pursuant to long-term leases and licenses on land owned by the governments of
New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. Okemo, Mount Sunapee and Stowe operate on land leased from the respective states in
which the resorts are located and on land owned by the Company.
In the Lodging segment, the Company owns and/or manages a collection of luxury hotels and condominiums under its RockResorts
brand; other strategic lodging properties and a large number of condominiums located in proximity to the Company’s North
American mountain resorts; National Park Service (“NPS”) concessionaire properties including the Grand Teton Lodge Company
(“GTLC”), which operates destination resorts in Grand Teton National Park; a Colorado resort ground transportation company
and mountain resort golf courses.
77
Vail Resorts Development Company (“VRDC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, conducts the operations of the Company’s Real Estate
segment, which owns, develops and sells real estate in and around the Company’s resort communities.
The Company’s mountain business and its lodging properties at or around the Company’s mountain resorts are seasonal in nature
with peak operating seasons primarily from mid-November through mid-April in North America. The peak operating season at
the Company’s Australian resorts, NPS concessionaire properties and golf courses generally occurs from June to early October.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and
its consolidated subsidiaries for which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Investments in which the Company does
not have a controlling financial interest, but has significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the
date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash — The Company considers cash to be restricted when withdrawal or general use is legally restricted. During peak
operations of the North American ski season, the Company’s restricted cash balance is primarily associated with customer
reservations deposits that are required to be held in a trust pursuant to statutory requirements until such reservations are fulfilled.
Accounts receivable — The Company records trade accounts receivable in the normal course of business related to the sale of
products or services. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a specific reserve analysis and on a percentage of accounts
receivable and takes into consideration such factors as historical write-offs, the economic climate and other factors that could
affect collectability. Write-offs are evaluated on a case by case basis.
Inventories — The Company’s inventories consist primarily of purchased retail goods, food and beverage items and spare parts.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, determined using primarily an average weighted cost method.
The Company records a reserve for estimated shrinkage and obsolete or unusable inventory.
Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost net of accumulated depreciation. Repairs and
maintenance are expensed as incurred. Expenditures that improve the functionality of the related asset or extend the useful life
are capitalized. When property, plant and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related gain or loss is included in
income from operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining
lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method, including property, plant
and equipment under capital leases, generally based on the following useful lives:
Land improvements
Buildings and building improvements
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Software
Vehicles
Estimated Life
in Years
10-35
7-30
2-30
3-10
3
3-10
Real Estate Held for Sale and Investment — The Company capitalizes as real estate held for sale and investment the original land
acquisition cost, direct construction and development costs, property taxes, interest recorded on costs related to real estate under
development and other related costs. Sales and marketing expenses are charged against income in the period incurred. Additionally,
sales commission expenses are charged against income in the period that the related revenue from real estate sales is recorded.
Deferred Financing Costs — Certain costs incurred with the issuance of debt and debt securities are capitalized and included as
a reduction in the net carrying value of long-term debt, net of accumulated amortization, with the exception of costs incurred
related to line-of-credit arrangements, which are included in deferred charges and other assets, net of accumulated amortization.
Amortization of such deferred financing costs are recorded to interest expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements
of Operations over the respective term of the applicable debt instruments. When debt is extinguished prior to its maturity date,
the amortization of the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs, or pro-rata portion thereof, is charged to loss on
extinguishment of debt.
78
Goodwill and Intangible Assets — The Company has classified as goodwill the cost in excess of estimated fair value of the net
assets of businesses acquired in purchase transactions. The Company’s major intangible asset classes are trademarks, water rights,
customer lists, property management contracts and Forest Service permits. Goodwill and various indefinite-lived intangible assets,
including certain trademarks, water rights and certain property management contracts, are not amortized but are subject to at least
annual impairment testing. The Company tests these non-amortizing assets annually (or more often, if necessary) for impairment
as of May 1. Amortizable intangible assets are amortized over the shorter of their contractual terms or estimated useful lives.
The testing for impairment consists of a comparison of the estimated fair value of the assets with their net carrying values. If the
net carrying amount of the assets exceed its estimated fair value, an impairment will be recognized for indefinite-lived intangibles,
including goodwill, in an amount equal to that excess. If the net carrying amount of the assets does not exceed the estimated fair
value, no impairment loss is recognized. For the testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment,
the Company performs a qualitative analysis to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit
or indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds the carrying amount, which includes an evaluation as to whether there have been
significant changes to macro-economic factors related to the reporting unit or intangible asset that could materially impact fair
value. If it is determined, based on qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset
is more likely than not less than carrying amount, a quantitative impairment test would be required, in which the Company would
determine the estimated fair value of its reporting units using discounted cash flow analyses and determine the estimated fair value
of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach.
As a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the impact it has had on the Company’s operations during the year ended
July 31, 2020, and the expected continuing impact of the pandemic on future operations, the Company determined that the estimated
fair value of its Colorado resort ground transportation company reporting unit within its Lodging segment no longer exceeded its
carrying value. As further discussed in Note 8, the Company recognized an impairment of approximately $28.4 million related to
its Colorado resort ground transportation company during the year ended July 31, 2020, which was recorded within asset
impairments on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations, with a corresponding reduction to goodwill, net of $25.7
million and to intangible assets, net and property, plant and equipment, net of $2.7 million. See Note 8, Supplementary Balance
Sheet Information, for additional information. The Company determined that there were no other impairments of goodwill, definite
and indefinite-lived assets for the years ended July 31, 2020, and that there was no impairment to goodwill and no material
impairment to definite or indefinite-lived intangible assets for the years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018.
Long-lived Assets — The Company evaluates potential impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If
the sum of the expected cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, is less than the net carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss
is recognized in the amount by which the net carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. As discussed above,
the Company recorded an impairment to long-lived assets related to its Colorado resort ground transportation company during
the year ended July 31, 2020. The Company determined that there were no other impairments of long-lived assets for the year
ended July 31, 2020, and determined there was no impairment of the net carrying amount of a long-lived asset occurred during
the years ended July 31, 2019 and 2018.
Revenue Recognition — The Company’s significant accounting policies with regard to revenue recognition are discussed in Note
3, Revenues.
Real Estate Cost of Sales — Costs of real estate transactions include direct project costs, common cost allocations (primarily
determined on relative sales value) and sales commission expense. The Company utilizes the relative sales value method to
determine cost of sales for condominium units sold within a project when specific identification of costs cannot be reasonably
determined.
Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of the Company’s entities operating outside of the United States is the
principal currency of the economic environment in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash, which is generally the
local currency. The assets and liabilities of these foreign operations are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance
sheet dates. Income and expense items are translated using the weighted average exchange rate for the period. Translation
adjustments from currency exchange, including intercompany transactions of a long-term nature, are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Intercompany transactions that are not of a long-term
nature are reported as gains and losses within “segment operating expense” and for intercompany loans within foreign currency
loss on intercompany loans on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Reserve Estimates — The Company uses estimates to record reserves for certain liabilities, including medical claims, workers’
compensation claims, third-party loss contingencies and property taxes, among other items. The Company estimates the probable
costs related to these liabilities that will be incurred and records that amount as a liability in its Consolidated Financial Statements.
79
Additionally, the Company records, as applicable, receivables related to insurance recoveries for loss contingencies if deemed
probable of recovery. These estimates are reviewed and adjusted as the facts and circumstances change. The Company records
legal costs related to defending claims as incurred.
Advertising Costs — Advertising costs are expensed at the time such advertising commences. Advertising expense for the years
ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $41.6 million, $44.6 million and $39.8 million, respectively, and was recorded within
Mountain and Lodging operating expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Income Taxes — Income tax expense includes U.S. tax (federal and state) and foreign income taxes. The Company’s provision
for income taxes is based on pre-tax income, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in estimates with regard to
uncertain tax positions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and for
operating loss and tax credit carrybacks or carryforwards. The change in deferred tax assets and liabilities for the period measures
the deferred tax provision or benefit for the period. Effects of changes in enacted tax laws on deferred tax assets and liabilities are
reflected as adjustments to the tax provision or benefit in the period of enactment. The Company’s deferred tax assets have been
reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent it is deemed to be more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is
to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is “more-likely-
than-not” to be sustained, on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires
the Company to estimate and measure the largest tax benefit that is cumulatively greater than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. Interest and penalties accrued in connection with uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of
income tax expense. See Note 11 “Income Taxes” for more information.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The recorded amounts for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, other
current assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of
amounts outstanding under the Company’s credit agreements and the Employee Housing Bonds (as defined in Note 6, Long-Term
Debt) approximate book value due to the variable nature of the interest rate, which is a market rate, associated with the debt. The
estimated fair value of the 6.25% Notes (as defined in Note 6, Long-Term Debt) is based on quoted market prices (a Level 2 input).
The estimated fair value of the EPR Secured Notes and EB-5 Development Notes (each as defined in Note 6, Long-Term Debt),
have been estimated using analyses based on current borrowing rates for debt with similar remaining maturities and ratings (a
Level 2 input). The carrying values, including any unamortized premium or discount, and estimated fair values of the 6.25% Notes,
EPR Secured Notes and EB-5 Development Notes as of July 31, 2020 are presented below (in thousands):
6.25% Notes
EPR Secured Notes
EB-5 Development Notes
July 31, 2020
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value
$
$
$
600,000 $
137,314 $
47,833 $
643,500
150,628
47,212
Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based upon the estimated fair
value of the award and is recognized as expense over the applicable vesting period of the award generally using the straight-line
method (see Note 17 “Stock Compensation Plan” for more information), less the amount of forfeited awards which are recorded
as they occur. The following table shows total net stock-based compensation expense for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and
2018 included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
Mountain stock-based compensation expense
Lodging stock-based compensation expense
Real Estate stock-based compensation expense
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
Less: benefit from income taxes
Net stock-based compensation expense
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
$
$
17,410 $
3,399
212
21,021
5,027
15,994 $
16,474 $
3,219
163
19,856
4,589
15,267 $
15,716
3,215
109
19,040
5,406
13,634
Concentration of Credit Risk — The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments in high-
80
quality credit institutions. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Concentration
of credit risk with respect to accounts and notes receivables is limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which
the Company transacts business, as well as their dispersion across many geographical areas. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral, but does require advance deposits on certain
transactions.
Accounting for Hedging Instruments — From time to time, the Company enters into interest rate swaps (the “Interest Rate Swaps”)
to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with variable-rate borrowings by converting the floating interest rate to a fixed
interest rate. As of July 31, 2020, the Company hedged the future cash flows associated with $400.0 million of the principal amount
outstanding of its Vail Holdings Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 6 “Long-Term Debt”), which were designated as cash flow
hedges. The accounting for changes in fair value of hedging instruments depends on the effectiveness of the hedge. In order to
qualify for hedge accounting, the underlying hedged item must expose the Company to risks associated with market fluctuations
and the financial instrument used must reduce the Company’s exposure to market fluctuation throughout the hedge period. Changes
in estimated fair value of the Interest Rate Swaps are recorded within change in estimated fair value of hedging instruments on
the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, and such change was recorded as a loss of $22.5 million
during the year ended July 31, 2020. Such amounts are reclassified into interest expense, net from other comprehensive income
during the period in which the hedged item affects earnings. As of July 31, 2020, the estimated fair value of the Interest Rate
Swaps was a liability of approximately $22.5 million and was recorded within other long-term liabilities on the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the impact of the underlying cash flows associated with the Interest Rate Swaps are recorded
within interest expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 10 “Fair Value Measurements”
for more information.
Leases — The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception or modification of the arrangement. An
arrangement is or contains a lease if there is one or more assets identified and the right to control the use of any identified asset
is conveyed to the Company for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Control over the use of an identified asset means
the lessee has both the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the asset and the right to direct the
use of the asset. Generally, the Company classifies a lease as a finance lease if the terms of the agreement effectively transfer
control of the underlying asset; otherwise, it is classified as an operating lease. For contracts that contain lease and non-lease
components, the Company accounts for these components separately. For leases with terms greater than twelve months, the
associated lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the estimated present value of future lease
payments over the lease term at commencement date. The Company’s leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate;
therefore, the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate to discount the future minimum lease payments. For leases
containing fixed rental escalation clauses, the escalators are factored into the determination of future minimum lease payments.
The Company includes options to extend a lease when it is reasonably certain that such options will be exercised. Lease expense
for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. See Note 4 “Leases” for more information.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Adopted Standards
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02,
“Leases (Topic 842),” which supersedes “Leases (Topic 840).” The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities
arising from all leases on the balance sheet, including those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance,
and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The standard also allows for an accounting policy election not to
recognize on the balance sheet lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of twelve months or less. Under the new guidance,
lessees are required to recognize a lease liability and an ROU asset on their balance sheets, while lessor accounting is largely
unchanged. In July 2018, the FASB released ASU No. 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements” which, among
other items, provided an additional and optional transition method. Under this method, an entity initially applies the standard at
the adoption date, including the election of certain transition reliefs, and recognizes a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening
balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 on August 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method as provided by
the standard. In accordance with this transition method, results for reporting periods beginning on August 1, 2019 are presented
under the new standard, while prior periods were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previously
81
applicable accounting guidance. The Company has elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition
guidance which allowed the Company to not reassess: (i) whether any existing or expired contracts are or contain leases; (ii) lease
classification of any expired or existing leases; or (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company has made an
accounting policy election to not record leases on the balance sheet with an initial term of twelve months or less. The Company
will recognize those lease payments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Additionally, the Company has elected the practical expedient to not evaluate existing or expired land easements that were not
previously accounted for as leases. At adoption, the Company was not able to determine the interest rate implicit in its leases;
therefore, for existing operating leases, the lease liability was measured using the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing
rate. For existing leases, the incremental borrowing rate used was based on the remaining lease term at the adoption date. For
leases with minimum lease payments adjusted periodically for inflation, the lease liability was measured using the minimum lease
payments adjusted by the inflation index at the adoption date.
On August 1, 2019, as a result of adopting the standard, the Company recorded $221.8 million of operating ROU assets and $254.2
million of related total operating lease liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (of which $219.3 million was included in
operating lease liabilities and $34.9 million was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities). As a result of the adoption,
the Company reclassified $32.4 million of unfavorable lease obligations, deferred rent credits and other related amounts to the
operating ROU assets balance, primarily from other long-term liabilities, which reduced the amount recognized as operating ROU
assets to $221.8 million. The adoption of the new lease standard did not result in a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning
retained earnings, and did not materially affect the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations or Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows for the year ended July 31, 2020. The Company’s Canyons finance lease was not affected by the implementation
of this standard as the arrangement is classified and recorded as a finance lease arrangement under both the previous and new
accounting guidance.
In April 2020, the FASB issued clarifying guidance on accounting for certain lease concessions related to the effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic under ASC Topic 842, allowing companies to make an election to either account for such lease concessions
(i) in the period that they occur as though enforceable rights and obligations for those concessions existed (regardless of whether
those enforceable rights and obligations for the concessions explicitly exist in the contract) or (ii) ratably over the remainder of
the lease term as modifications to the contract. The Company made a policy election to account for such lease concessions as
though enforceable rights and obligations to make those concessions existed in the contracts and as a result, will account for
concessions in the period in which they occur. This election did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended July 31, 2020.
Standards Being Evaluated
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference
Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The ASU provides optional transition guidance, for a limited time, to companies that have
contracts, hedging relationships or other transactions that reference the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another
reference rate which is expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments provide optional expedients
and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions if certain criteria are met. The
amendments in this update are effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The amendments in this update may
be applied as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively
from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements
are available to be issued. All other amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
3.
Revenues
Revenue Recognition
The following provides information about the Company’s composition of revenue recognized from contracts with customers and
other revenues, the performance obligations under those contracts, and the significant judgments made in accounting for those
contracts:
• Mountain revenue is derived from a wide variety of sources, including, among other things: lift revenue, which includes
sales of lift tickets and pass products; ski school revenue, which includes the revenue derived from ski school operations;
dining revenue, which includes both casual and fine dining on-mountain operations; retail sales and equipment rentals;
and other on-mountain revenue, which includes private ski club revenue (which includes both club dues and amortization
of initiation fees), marketing and internet advertising revenue, municipal services and lodging and transportation
operations at the Company’s Australian ski areas. Revenue is recognized over time as performance obligations are satisfied
82
as control of the good or service (e.g. access to ski areas, provision of ski school services, etc.) is transferred to the
customer, except for the Company’s retail sales and dining operations revenues which are recognized at a point in time
when performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of the underlying goods to the customer. The Company
records deferred revenue primarily related to the sale of pass products. Deferred revenue is generally recognized throughout
the ski season as the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied as control of the service (e.g. access to ski areas
throughout the ski season) is transferred to the customer. Transfer of control is based on an estimated number of pass
product holder visits relative to total expected visits. Total expected visits are estimated based on historical data, and the
Company believes this estimate provides a faithful depiction of its customers’ pass product usage. When sufficient
historical data to determine usage patterns is not available, such as in the case of new product offerings, deferred revenue
is recognized on a straight-line basis throughout the ski season until sufficient historical usage patterns are available. The
Company also includes other sources of revenue, primarily related to commercial leasing and employee housing leasing
arrangements, within other mountain revenue.
• Lodging revenue is derived from a wide variety of sources, including, among other things: revenue from owned hotel
rooms and managed hotel rooms; revenue from hotel dining operations; transportation revenue which relates to the
Company’s Colorado resort ground transportation operations; and other lodging revenue which includes property
management services, managed properties other costs reimbursements, private golf club revenue (which includes both
club dues and amortization of initiation fees), and golf course fees. Lodging revenue also includes managed hotel property
payroll cost reimbursements related to payroll costs at managed properties where the Company is the employer, which
are reimbursed by the owner with no added margin. Therefore, these revenues and corresponding expenses have no net
effect on the Company’s operating income or net income. Other than revenue from dining operations, lodging revenue
is mostly recognized over time as performance obligations are satisfied as control of the service (e.g. nightly hotel room
access) is transferred to the customer.
• Real estate revenue primarily relates to the sale of development land parcels. Real estate revenue is generally recognized
at a point in time when performance obligations have been satisfied, which is usually upon closing of the sales transaction
and in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled.
For certain contracts that have an original term length of one year or less, the Company uses the practical expedient applicable to
such contracts and does not consider the time value of money. For contracts with an expected term in excess of one year, the
Company has considered the provisions of Topic 606 in determining whether contracts contain a financing component.
The Company presents revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, net of taxes, when collected from
its customers that are remitted or payable to government taxing authorities, except when products are inclusive of taxes where
applicable.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company closed its North American destination mountain resorts, regional ski areas
and retail stores beginning on March 15, 2020. To encourage the Company’s pass product holders to renew their pass purchases
for next season following the closures this past spring, the Company announced a credit offer on April 27, 2020 for existing
2019/2020 North American ski season pass product holders to purchase 2020/2021 North American ski season pass products at a
discount (the “Credit Offer”). The Credit Offer discounts range from a minimum of 20% to a maximum of 80% for 2019/2020
season pass holders, depending on the number of days the pass holder used their pass product during the 2019/2020 North American
ski season and a credit, with no minimum, but up to 80% for multi-day pass products, such as the Epic Day Pass, based on total
unused days. For accounting purposes, the Credit Offer constituted a material right to existing 2019/2020 pass product holders to
which the Company allocated a transaction price of approximately $120.9 million. As a result, the Company deferred $120.9
million of pass product revenue, which would have been recognized as lift revenue during the year ended July 31, 2020. The
Company expects to recognize the revenue associated with the Credit Offer in the second and third fiscal quarters of the fiscal
year ending July 31, 2021 or the second and third fiscal quarters of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2022. While the Company
expects most of this revenue to be recognized during Fiscal 2021, in the event that a pass holder obtains a refund under Epic
Coverage for the 2020/2021 ski season and is eligible to utilize their credit toward the purchase of a pass product for the 2021/2022
ski season, a portion of this deferred revenue and related deferred cost will be recognized in Fiscal 2022. In addition, as a result
of the pass product revenue deferral, the Company also deferred approximately $2.9 million of the associated costs of obtaining
a contract (primarily credit card processing fees), which will be recognized commensurate with the associated deferred revenue.
The Company estimated the standalone selling price of the Credit Offer by utilizing historical pass holder renewal data to estimate
the total amount of credits that are expected to be redeemed. Estimates and assumptions made regarding expected renewal rates
impacted the estimate of the transaction price allocated to the Credit Offer and could vary materially from the amount of revenue
deferred depending upon actual customer redemptions.
83
Disaggregation of Revenues
The following table presents net revenues disaggregated by segment and major revenue type for the years ended July 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
Mountain net revenue:
Lift
Ski School
Dining
Retail/Rental
Other
Total Mountain net revenue
Lodging net revenue:
Owned hotel rooms
Managed condominium rooms
Dining
Transportation
Golf
Other
Payroll cost reimbursements
Total Lodging net revenue
Total Resort net revenue
Total Real Estate net revenue
Total net revenue
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
2020
$
913,091
$
1,033,234
$
189,131
160,763
270,299
177,159
1,710,443
44,992
76,480
38,252
15,796
17,412
44,933
237,865
10,549
248,414
1,958,857
4,847
1,963,704
$
$
$
$
$
215,060
181,837
320,267
205,803
1,956,201
64,826
86,236
53,730
21,275
19,648
54,617
300,332
14,330
314,662
2,270,863
712
2,271,575
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
880,293
189,910
161,402
296,466
194,851
1,722,922
65,252
70,198
48,554
21,111
18,110
47,577
270,802
13,841
284,643
2,007,565
3,988
2,011,553
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
Several of the Company’s contracts with customers include multiple performance obligations, primarily related to bundled services
such as ski school packages, lodging packages and events (e.g. weddings and conferences). For such contracts, revenue is allocated
to each distinct and separate performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling prices
are generally based on observable prices charged to customers or estimated based on historical experience and information.
Contract Balances
Contract liabilities are recorded primarily as deferred revenues when payments are received or due in advance of the Company’s
performance, including amounts which may be refundable. The deferred revenue balance is primarily related to accounts receivable
or cash payments recorded in advance of satisfying the Company’s performance obligations related to sales of pass products prior
to the start of the ski season, private club initiation fees and other related advance purchase products, including advance purchase
lift tickets, multiple-day lift tickets, ski school lessons, equipment rentals and lodging advance deposits. Due to the seasonality of
the Company’s operations, its largest deferred revenue balances occur during the North American pass product selling window,
which generally begins in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. Deferred revenue balances of a short-term nature were $256.4 million
and $335.7 million as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Deferred revenue balances of a long-term nature, comprised primarily
of long-term private club initiation fee revenue, were $121.9 million and $124.3 million as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
For the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company recognized approximately $266.5 million of revenue that was included in the
deferred revenue balance as of July 31, 2019. As of July 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining period over which revenue for
unsatisfied performance obligations on long-term private club contracts will be recognized was approximately 16 years.
Contract assets are recorded as trade receivables when the right to consideration is unconditional. Trade receivable balances were
$106.7 million and $270.9 million as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Payments from customers are based on billing terms
established in the contracts with customers, which vary by the type of customer, the location and the products or services offered.
The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. For certain products or services and customer types,
contracts require payment before the products are delivered or services are provided to the customer. Impairment losses related
84
to contract assets are recognized through the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts analysis. Contract asset write-offs are
evaluated on an individual basis.
Costs to Obtain Contracts with Customers
The Company expects that credit card fees and sales commissions paid in order to obtain season ski pass products contracts are
recoverable. Accordingly, the Company records these amounts as assets when they are paid prior to the start of the ski season. As
of July 31, 2020, $3.5 million of costs to obtain contracts with customers were recorded within other current assets on the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Deferred credit card fees and sales commissions are amortized commensurate with the recognition
of season ski pass revenue. The Company recorded amortization of $11.0 million, $10.6 million and $8.3 million for these costs
during the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which were recorded within Mountain and Lodging operating
expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Utilizing the practical expedient provided for under Topic 606, the Company has elected to expense credit card fees and sales
commissions related to non-season ski pass products and services as incurred, as the amortization period is generally one year or
less for the time between customer purchase and utilization. These fees are recorded within Mountain and Lodging operating
expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
4.
Leases
The Company’s operating leases consist primarily of commercial and retail space, office space, employee residential units, vehicles
and other equipment. The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception or modification. The
Company’s lease contracts generally range from 1 year to 60 years, with some lease contracts containing one or more lease
extension options, exercisable at the Company’s discretion. The Company generally does not include these lease extension options
in the initial lease term as it is not reasonably certain that it will exercise such options at contract inception. In addition, certain
lease arrangements contain fixed and variable lease payments. The variable lease payments are primarily contingent rental payments
based on: (i) a percentage of revenue related to the leased property; (ii) payments based on a percentage of sales over contractual
levels; or (iii) lease payments adjusted for changes in an index or market value. These variable lease payments are typically
recognized when the underlying event occurs and are included in operating expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements
of Operations in the same line item as the expense arising from fixed lease payments. The Company’s lease agreements may also
include non-lease components, such as common area maintenance and insurance, which are accounted for separately. Future lease
payments that are contingent and non-lease components are not included in the measurement of the operating lease liability. The
Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants. Lease expense related
to lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The Company’s leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. As a result, the Company measures the lease liability
using an estimated incremental borrowing rate which is intended to reflect the rate of interest the Company would pay on a
collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms. The Company applies the estimated
incremental borrowing rates at a portfolio level based on the economic environment associated with the lease.
The Company uses the long-lived assets impairment guidance to determine recognition and measurement of an ROU asset
impairment, if any. The Company monitors for events or changes in circumstances that require a reassessment.
The components of lease expense for the year ended July 31, 2020, were as follows (in thousands):
Finance leases:
Amortization of the finance ROU assets
Interest on lease liabilities
Operating leases:
Operating lease expense
Short-term lease expense (1)
Variable lease expense
Year Ended
July 31, 2020
$
$
$
$
$
9,753
34,035
43,303
13,943
1,583
(1) Short-term lease expense is attributable to leases with terms of 12 months or less which are not included within the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
85
The following table presents the supplemental cash flow information associated with the Company’s leasing activities for the year
ended July 31, 2020 (in thousands):
Cash flow supplemental information:
Operating cash outflows for operating leases
Operating cash outflows for finance leases
Financing cash outflows for finance leases
Non-cash supplemental information:
Operating ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations
Weighted-average remaining lease terms and discount rates are as follows:
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)
Operating leases
Finance leases
Weighted-average discount rate
Operating leases
Finance leases
Year Ended
July 31, 2020
$
$
$
$
55,344
29,311
5,387
18,013
As of July 31, 2020
10.6
42.9
4.5%
10.0%
Future lease payments for operating and finance leases as of July 31, 2020 reflected by fiscal year (August 1 through July 31) are
as follows (in thousands):
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total future minimum lease payments
Less amount representing interest
Total lease liabilities
Operating Leases
Finance Leases
$
$
47,013
$
43,699
38,353
34,431
32,405
137,501
333,402
(79,256)
254,146
$
28,818
29,394
29,982
30,582
31,193
1,773,855
1,923,824
(1,577,790)
346,034
The current portion of operating lease liabilities of approximately $36.6 million as of July 31, 2020 is recorded within accounts
payables and accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Finance lease liabilities are recorded within long-term debt,
net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
86
Future minimum lease payments in accordance with Topic 840 as of July 31, 2019, reflected by fiscal year (August 1 through July
31), were as follows (in thousands):
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total future minimum lease payments
Less amount representing interest
Net future minimum lease payments
Operating Leases
Capital Leases
$
$
44,984
42,512
39,440
34,840
30,836
142,526
335,138
—
335,138
$
$
28,253
28,818
29,394
29,982
30,582
1,805,048
1,952,077
(1,611,816)
340,261
The Canyons finance lease obligation represents the only material finance lease entered into by the Company and was $346.0
million as of July 31, 2020, which represents the estimated annual lease payments for the remaining initial 50 year term of the
lease assuming annual increases at the floor of 2% and discounted using an interest rate of 10%. As of July 31, 2020, the Company
has recorded $117.8 million of finance lease ROU assets in connection with the Canyons lease, net of $65.8 million of accumulated
amortization, which is included within property, plant and equipment, net in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
5.
Net Income Per Common Share
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to Vail Resorts stockholders
by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, resulting in the issuance of shares of common stock that would
then share in the earnings of Vail Resorts.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of Whistler Blackcomb in October 2016 (see Note 7, Acquisitions), the Company
issued consideration in the form of shares of Vail Resorts common stock (the “Vail Shares”) and shares of the Company’s wholly-
owned Canadian subsidiary (“Exchangeco”). Whistler Blackcomb shareholders elected to receive 3,327,719 Vail Shares
and 418,095 shares of Exchangeco (the “Exchangeco Shares”). Both Vail Shares and Exchangeco Shares have a par value of
$0.01 per share, and Exchangeco Shares, while outstanding, are substantially the economic equivalent of the Vail Shares and are
exchangeable, at any time prior to the seventh anniversary of the closing of the acquisition, into Vail Shares. The Company’s
calculation of weighted-average shares outstanding includes the Exchangeco Shares.
Presented below is basic and diluted EPS for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Net income per share:
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts
Weighted-average shares outstanding
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
Basic
Diluted
Basic
Diluted
Basic
Diluted
$ 98,833 $ 98,833 $ 301,163 $ 301,163 $ 379,898 $ 379,898
40,227
40,227
40,292
40,292
40,337
40,337
Weighted-average Exchangeco shares outstanding
46
46
57
57
60
Total Weighted-average shares outstanding
40,273
40,273
40,349
40,349
40,397
Effect of dilutive securities
Total shares
—
565
—
809
—
40,273
40,838
40,349
41,158
40,397
60
40,397
1,221
41,618
Net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. $
2.45 $
2.42 $
7.46 $
7.32 $
9.40 $
9.13
The Company computes the effect of dilutive securities using the treasury stock method and average market prices during the
period. The number of shares issuable on the exercise of share based awards that were excluded from the calculation of diluted
net income per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive totaled approximately 2,000, 4,000 and
2,000 for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
87
Dividends
For the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company paid cash dividends of $5.28 per share ($212.7 million in the aggregate). The
Company announced on April 1, 2020 that it would be suspending its quarterly dividend for at least the next two quarters, and
will be subject to a dividend limitation under the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period of the Vail Holdings Credit
Agreement (as defined in Note 6, Long-Term Debt).
6.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt as of July 31, 2020 and 2019 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement revolver (a)
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement term loan (a)
6.25% Notes (b)
Whistler Credit Agreement revolver (c)
EPR Secured Notes (d)
EB-5 Development Notes (e)
Employee housing bonds (f)
Canyons obligation (g)
Other (h)
Total debt
Maturity
2024
2024
2025
2024
2034-2036
2021
2027-2039
2063
2020-2033
Less: Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs (i)
Less: Current maturities (j)
Long-term debt, net
$
July 31,
2020
July 31,
2019
$
— $
1,203,125
600,000
58,236
114,162
51,500
52,575
346,034
18,616
2,444,248
(6,551)
63,677
2,387,122 $
208,000
914,375
—
45,454
—
—
52,575
340,261
19,465
1,580,130
3,870
48,516
1,527,744
(a) On September 23, 2019, in order to fund the acquisition of Peak Resorts, Inc. (“Peak Resorts”), which included the
prepayment of certain portions of the outstanding debt and lease obligations of Peak Resorts contemporaneous with the closing
of the transaction (see Note 7, Acquisitions), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Vail Holdings, Inc. (“VHI”), entered
into the Second Amendment to the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Vail Holdings Credit Agreement”),
with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and other lenders named therein, through which those lenders agreed
to provide an additional $335.6 million in incremental term loans and agreed, on behalf of all lenders, to extend the maturity
date for the outstanding term loans and revolver facility under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement to September 23, 2024.
No other material terms of the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement were altered under the amendment.
On April 28, 2020, VHI, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
and certain Lenders entered into a Third Amendment to the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”).
Pursuant to the Third Amendment, among other terms, VHI is exempt from complying with the Vail Holdings Credit
Agreement’s maximum leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance covenants for each of the
fiscal quarters ending July 31, 2020 through January 31, 2022 (unless VHI makes a one-time irrevocable election to terminate
such exemption period prior to such date) (such period, the “Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period”), after which
VHI will again be required to comply with such covenants starting with the fiscal quarter ending April 30, 2022 (or such
earlier fiscal quarter as elected by VHI). After the expiration of the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period:
•
the maximum leverage ratio permitted under the maximum leverage ratio financial maintenance covenant reduces
each quarter as follows:
(A) first full fiscal quarter: 6.25 to 1.00;
(B) second full fiscal quarter: 5.75 to 1.00;
(C) third full fiscal quarter: 5.25 to 1.00; and
(D) fourth full fiscal quarter and for each fiscal quarter thereafter: 5.00 to 1.00.
•
the minimum interest coverage ratio permitted under the minimum interest coverage ratio financial maintenance
covenant will be 2.00 to 1.00.
88
In addition, VHI is required to comply with a monthly minimum liquidity test (liquidity is defined as unrestricted cash and
temporary cash investments of VRI and its restricted subsidiaries and available commitments under the Vail Holdings Credit
Agreement revolver) of not less than $150.0 million, during the period that began on July 31, 2020 and ending on the date
VHI delivers a compliance certificate for the Company and its subsidiaries’ first fiscal quarter following the end of the Financial
Covenants Temporary Waiver Period.
The Company is prohibited from the following activities during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period (unless
approval is obtained by a majority of the Lenders):
• paying any dividends or making share repurchases, unless (x) no default or potential default exists under the Vail
Holdings Credit Agreement and (y) the Company has liquidity (as defined above) of at least $400.0 million, and the
aggregate amount of dividends paid and share repurchases made by the Company during the Financial Covenants
Temporary Waiver Period may not exceed $38.2 million in any fiscal quarter;
• making capital expenditures in excess of $200.0 million per 12-month period ending January 31, other than non-
recurring extraordinary capital expenditures incurred in connection with emergency repairs, life safety repairs or
ordinary course maintenance repairs;
•
incurring any indebtedness secured by the collateral under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement other than pursuant
to the existing revolving commitments under the Credit Agreement;
• making non-ordinary course investments in unrestricted subsidiaries unless the Company has liquidity (as defined
above) of at least $300.0 million;
• making investments in non-subsidiaries in excess of $50.0 million in the aggregate; and
• acquiring all or a majority of the capital stock or all or any substantial portion of the assets of any entity or merging
or consolidating with another entity.
During the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, borrowings under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement, including
the term loan facility, bear interest annually at LIBOR plus 2.50% and, for amounts in excess of $400.0 million, LIBOR is
subject to a floor of 0.75%. In addition, pursuant to the Third Amendment, the amount by which we are able to increase
availability (under the revolver or in the form of term loans) was increased to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
the greater of (i) $2.25 billion and (ii) the product of 3.25 and the trailing four-quarter Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the
Credit Agreement).
As of July 31, 2020, the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement consists of a $500.0 million revolving credit facility and a $1.2
billion outstanding term loan facility. The term loan facility is subject to quarterly amortization of principal of approximately
$15.6 million (which began in January 2020), in equal installments, for a total of 5% of principal payable in each year and
the final payment of all amounts outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest due in September 2024. The proceeds of the
loans made under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement may be used to fund the Company’s working capital needs, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, investments and other general corporate purposes, including the issuance of letters of credit, subject
to the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period limitations, as discussed above. Borrowings under the Vail Holdings
Credit Agreement, including the term loan facility, bear interest annually at LIBOR plus 2.50% as of July 31, 2020 (2.66%
as of July 31, 2020 for $400.0 million of borrowings, and for amounts in excess of $400.0 million in which LIBOR is subject
to a floor of 0.75% during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, 3.25% as of July 31, 2020). Other than as
impacted by the provisions in place during the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period, interest rate margins may
fluctuate based upon the ratio of the Company’s Net Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA on a trailing four-quarter basis. The
Vail Holdings Credit Agreement also includes a quarterly unused commitment fee, which is equal to a percentage determined
by the Net Funded Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio, as each such term is defined in the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement,
multiplied by the daily amount by which the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement commitment exceeds the total of outstanding
loans and outstanding letters of credit (0.4% as of July 31, 2020). During the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company entered
into various interest rate swap agreements to hedge the LIBOR-based variable interest rate component of underlying cash
flows of $400.0 million in principal amount of its Vail Holdings Credit Agreement for the remaining term of the agreement
at an effective rate of 1.46%.
(b) On May 4, 2020, the Company completed its offering of $600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% senior notes
due 2025 at par (the “Notes”), and a portion of the net proceeds were utilized to pay down the outstanding balance of the
revolver component of its Vail Holdings Credit Agreement in its entirety (which will continue to be available to the Company
to borrow including throughout the Financial Covenants Temporary Waiver Period) and to pay the fees and expenses associated
with the offering, with the remaining net proceeds intended to be used for general corporate purposes.
The Company will pay interest on the Notes on May 15 and November 15 of each year commencing on November 15, 2020.
The Notes will mature on May 15, 2025. The Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2022
89
at the redemption prices specified in an Indenture dated as of May 4, 2020 (the “Indenture”) plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Prior to May 15, 2022, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, plus a “make-whole” premium as specified in the Indenture. In addition, prior to
May 15, 2022, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes with an amount not to
exceed the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at the redemption price of 106.25% of the principal amount of the
notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes are senior
unsecured obligations of the Company, are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, and rank equally
in right of payment with existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company and the guarantors (as defined in the Indenture).
The Indenture requires that, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in the Indenture), the Company shall
offer to purchase all of the outstanding Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the outstanding principal amount
of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Company or certain of its subsidiaries dispose of assets, under certain
circumstances, the Company will be required to either invest the net cash proceeds from such assets sales in its business within
a specified period of time, repay certain senior secured debt or debt of its non-guarantor subsidiaries, or make an offer to
purchase a principal amount of the Notes equal to the excess net cash proceeds at a purchase price of 100% of their principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company and the guarantors to incur
liens on assets; merge or consolidate with another company or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all
or substantially all of the Company’s assets or engage in Sale and Leaseback Transactions (as defined in the Indenture). The
Indenture does not contain any financial maintenance covenants. Certain of the covenants will not apply to the Notes so long
as the Notes have investment grade ratings from two specified rating agencies and no event of default has occurred and is
continuing under the Indenture. The Indenture includes customary events of default, including failure to make payment, failure
to comply with the obligations set forth in the Indenture, certain defaults on certain other indebtedness, certain events of
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization, and invalidity of the guarantees of the Notes issued pursuant to the Indenture.
(c) Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership (“Whistler LP”) and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership
(“Blackcomb LP”), together “The WB Partnerships,” are party to a credit agreement, dated as of November 12, 2013 (as
amended, the “Whistler Credit Agreement”), by and among Whistler LP, Blackcomb LP, certain subsidiaries of Whistler LP
and Blackcomb LP party thereto as guarantors (the “Whistler Subsidiary Guarantors”), the financial institutions party thereto
as lenders and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, as administrative agent. The Whistler Credit Agreement consists of a C$300.0
million revolving credit facility, and during the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company entered into an amendment of the
Whistler Credit Agreement which extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility to December 15, 2024. No other
material terms of the Whistler Credit Agreement were altered. The WB Partnerships’ obligations under the Whistler Credit
Agreement are guaranteed by the Whistler Subsidiary Guarantors and are collateralized by a pledge of the capital stock of
the Whistler Subsidiary Guarantors and a pledge of substantially all of the assets of Whistler LP, Blackcomb LP and the
Whistler Subsidiary Guarantors. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Whistler Credit Agreement, the WB Partnerships
have the ability to increase the commitment amount by up to C$75.0 million, subject to lender approval. Borrowings under
the Whistler Credit Agreement are available in Canadian or U.S. dollars and bear interest annually, subject to an applicable
margin based on the WB Partnerships’ Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Whistler Credit Agreement), with
pricing as of July 31, 2020, in the case of borrowings (i) in Canadian dollars, at the WB Partnerships’ option, either (a) at the
Canadian Prime Rate plus 1.25% per annum or (b) by way of the issuance of bankers’ acceptances plus 2.25% per annum;
and (ii) in U.S. dollars, at the WB Partnerships option, either at (a) the U.S. Base Rate plus 1.25% per annum or (b) Bankers
Acceptance Rate plus 2.25% per annum. As of July 31, 2020, all borrowings under the Whistler Credit Agreement were made
in Canadian dollars and by way of the issuance of bankers’ acceptances plus 2.25% (approximately 2.79% as of July 31,
2020). The Whistler Credit Agreement also includes a quarterly unused commitment fee based on the Consolidated Total
Leverage Ratio, which as of July 31, 2020 is equal to 0.5063% per annum. The Whistler Credit Agreement provides for
affirmative and negative covenants that restrict, among other things, the WB Partnerships’ ability to incur indebtedness and
liens, dispose of assets, make capital expenditures, make distributions and make investments. In addition, the Whistler Credit
Agreement includes the restrictive financial covenants (leverage ratios and interest coverage ratios) customary for facilities
of this type.
(d) On September 24, 2019, in conjunction with the acquisition of Peak Resorts (see Note 7, Acquisitions), the Company
assumed various secured borrowings (the “EPR Secured Notes”) under the master credit and security agreements and other
related agreements, as amended, (collectively, the “EPR Agreements”) with EPT Ski Properties, Inc. and its affiliates (“EPR”).
The EPR Secured Notes include the following:
i. The Alpine Valley Secured Note. The $4.6 million Alpine Valley Secured Note provides for interest payments
through its maturity on December 1, 2034. As of July 31, 2020, interest on this note accrued at a rate of 11.21%.
90
ii. The Boston Mills/Brandywine Secured Note. The $23.3 million Boston Mills/Brandywine Secured Note provides
for interest payments through its maturity on December 1, 2034. As of July 31, 2020, interest on this note accrued
at a rate of 10.75%.
iii. The Jack Frost/Big Boulder Secured Note. The $14.3 million Jack Frost/Big Boulder Secured Note provides for
interest payments through its maturity on December 1, 2034. As of July 31, 2020, interest on this note accrued
at a rate of 10.75%.
iv. The Mount Snow Secured Note. The $51.1 million Mount Snow Secured Note provides for interest payments
through its maturity on December 1, 2034. As of July 31, 2020, interest on this note accrued at a rate of 11.78%.
v. The Hunter Mountain Secured Note. The $21.0 million Hunter Mountain Secured Note provides for interest
payments through its maturity on January 5, 2036. As of July 31, 2020, interest on this note accrued at a rate of
8.57%.
The EPR Secured Notes are secured by all or substantially all of the assets of Peak Resorts and its subsidiaries, including
mortgages on the Alpine Valley, Boston Mills, Brandywine, Jack Frost, Big Boulder, Mount Snow and Hunter Mountain ski
resorts. The EPR Secured Notes bear interest at specified interest rates, as discussed above, which are subject to increase each
year by the lesser of (i) three times the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index or (ii) a capped index (the “Capped
CPI Index”), which is 1.75% for the Hunter Mountain Secured Note and 1.50% for all other notes. The EPR Agreements
provide for affirmative and negative covenants that restrict, among other things, the ability of Peak Resorts and its subsidiaries
to incur indebtedness, dispose of assets, make distributions and make investments. In addition, the EPR Agreements include
restrictive covenants, including maximum leverage ratio and consolidated fixed charge ratio. An additional contingent interest
payment would be due to EPR if, on a calendar year basis, the gross receipts from the properties securing any of the individual
EPR Secured Notes (the “Gross Receipts”) are more than the result (the “Interest Quotient”) of dividing the total interest
charges for the EPR Secured Notes by a specified percentage rate (the “Additional Interest Rate”). In such a case, the additional
interest payment would equal the difference between the Gross Receipts and the Interest Quotient multiplied by the Additional
Interest Rate. This calculation is made on an aggregated basis for the notes secured by the Jack Frost, Big Boulder, Boston
Mills, Brandywine and Alpine Valley ski resorts, where the Additional Interest Rate is 10.0%; on a standalone basis for the
note secured by the Company’s Mount Snow ski resort, where the Additional Interest Rate is 12.0%; and on a standalone
basis for the note secured by the Company’s Hunter Mountain ski resort, where the Additional Interest Rate is 8.0%. Peak
Resorts does not have the right to prepay the EPR Secured Notes. The EPR Secured Notes were recorded at their estimated
fair value in conjunction with the acquisition of Peak Resorts on September 24, 2019. The EPR Agreements grant EPR certain
other rights including (i) the option to purchase the Boston Mills, Brandywine, Jack Frost, Big Boulder or Alpine Valley
resorts, which is exercisable no sooner than two years and no later than one year prior to the maturity dates of the applicable
EPR Secured Note for such properties, with any closings to be held on the applicable maturity dates; and, if EPR exercises
the purchase option, EPR will enter into an agreement with the Company for the lease of each acquired property for an initial
term of 20 years, plus options to extend the lease for two additional periods of ten years each; (ii) a right of first refusal through
2021, subject to certain conditions, to provide all or a portion of the financing associated with any purchase, ground lease,
sale/leaseback, management or financing transaction contemplated by Peak Resorts with respect to any new or existing ski
resort properties; and (iii) a right of first refusal through 2021 to purchase the Company’s Attitash ski resort in the event the
Company were to desire to sell the Attitash ski resort. To date, EPR has not exercised any such purchase options.
In addition, Peak Resorts is required to maintain a debt service reserve account which amounts are applied to fund interest
payments and other amounts due and payable to EPR. As of July 31, 2020 the Company had funded the EPR debt service
reserve account in an amount equal to approximately $5.7 million, which was included in other current assets in the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(e) Peak Resorts serves as the general partner for two limited partnerships, Carinthia Group 1, LP and Carinthia Group 2,
LP (together, the “Carinthia Partnerships”), which were formed to raise $52.0 million through the Immigrant Investor Program
administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act
(the “EB-5 Program”). The EB-5 Program was created to stimulate the U.S. economy through the creation of jobs and capital
investments in U.S. companies by foreign investors. The program allocates immigrant visas to qualified individuals (“EB-5
Investors”) seeking lawful permanent resident status based on their investment in a U.S commercial enterprise. On December
27, 2016, Peak Resorts borrowed $52.0 million from the Carinthia Partnerships to fund two capital projects at Mount Snow.
The amounts were borrowed through two loan agreements, which provided $30.0 million and $22.0 million (together, the
“EB-5 Development Notes”). Amounts outstanding under the EB-5 Development Notes accrue simple interest at a fixed rate
of 1.0% per annum until the maturity date, which is December 27, 2021, subject to an extension of up to two additional years
at the option of the borrowers, with lender consent. If the maturity date is extended, amounts outstanding under the EB-5
Development Notes will accrue simple interest at a fixed rate of 7.0% per annum during the first year of extension and a fixed
rate of 10.0% per annum during the second year of extension. Upon an event of default (as defined), amounts outstanding
91
under the EB-5 Development Notes shall bear interest at the rate of 5.0% per annum, subject to the extension increases. While
the EB-5 Development Notes are outstanding, Peak Resorts is restricted from taking certain actions without the consent of
the lenders, including, but not limited to, transferring or disposing of the properties or assets financed with loan proceeds. In
addition, Peak Resorts is prohibited from prepaying outstanding amounts owed if such prepayment would jeopardize any of
the EB-5 Investors from being admitted to the U.S. via the EB-5 Program.
(f) The Company has recorded the outstanding debt of four Employee Housing Entities (each an “Employee Housing Entity”
and collectively the “Employee Housing Entities”): Breckenridge Terrace, Tarnes, BC Housing and Tenderfoot. The proceeds
of the Employee Housing Bonds were used to develop apartment complexes designated primarily for use by the Company’s
seasonal employees at its Colorado mountain resorts. The Employee Housing Bonds are variable rate, interest-only instruments
with interest rates tied to LIBOR plus 0% to 0.1% (0.17% to 0.27% as of July 31, 2020).
Interest on the Employee Housing Bonds is paid monthly in arrears and the interest rate is adjusted weekly. No principal
payments are due on the Employee Housing Bonds until maturity. Each Employee Housing Entity’s bonds were issued in two
series. The bonds for each Employee Housing Entity are backed by letters of credit issued under the Vail Holdings Credit
Agreement. The table below presents the principal amounts outstanding for the Employee Housing Bonds as of July 31, 2020
(in thousands):
Breckenridge Terrace
Tarnes
BC Housing
Tenderfoot
Total
Maturity (a)
2039
2039
2027
2035
$
$
Tranche A
Tranche B
Total
14,980 $
8,000
9,100
5,700
37,780 $
5,000 $
2,410
1,500
5,885
14,795 $
19,980
10,410
10,600
11,585
52,575
(g) On May 24, 2013, VR CPC Holdings, Inc. (“VR CPC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a
transaction agreement with affiliate companies of Talisker Corporation (“Talisker”) pursuant to which the parties entered into
a master lease agreement (the “Lease”) and certain ancillary transaction documents on May 29, 2013 related to the former
stand-alone Canyons Resort (“Canyons”), pursuant to which the Company assumed the resort operations of the Canyons. The
Lease between VR CPC and Talisker has an initial term of 50 years with six 50-year renewal options. The Lease provides for
$25 million in annual payments, which increase each year by an inflation-linked index of CPI less 1% per annum, with a floor
of 2%. Vail Resorts has guaranteed the payments under the Lease. The obligation at July 31, 2020 represents future lease
payments for the remaining initial lease term of 50 years (including annual increases at the floor of 2%) discounted using an
interest rate of 10%, and includes accumulated accreted interest expense of approximately $40.7 million.
(h) During the year ended July 31, 2019, the Company completed two real estate sales transactions that were accounted for
as financing arrangements as a result of the Company’s continuing involvement with the underlying assets that were sold,
including but not limited to, the obligation to repurchase finished commercial space from the development projects upon
completion. The Company received approximately $11.2 million of proceeds for these sales transactions during the year ended
July 31, 2019, which are reflected within long-term debt, net. Other obligations also consist of a $3.6 million note outstanding
to the Colorado Water Conservation Board, which matures on September 16, 2028, and other financing arrangements. Other
obligations, including the Colorado Water Conservation Board note, bear interest at rates ranging from 5.1% to 5.5%.
(i) In connection with the acquisition of Peak Resorts, the Company estimated the acquisition date fair values of the debt
instruments assumed, including the EPR Secured Notes and the EB-5 Development Notes, and recorded any difference between
such estimated fair values and the par value of debt instruments as unamortized premiums and discounts, which is amortized
and recorded to interest expense, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations over the respective term of
the applicable debt instruments. Additionally, certain costs incurred with regard to the issuance of debt instruments are
capitalized and included as a reduction in the net carrying value of long-term debt, net of accumulated amortization, with the
exception of costs incurred related to line-of-credit arrangements, which are included in deferred charges and other assets,
net of accumulated amortization. Amortization of such deferred financing costs are recorded to interest expense, net on the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations over the respective term of the applicable debt instruments
(j) Current maturities represent principal payments due in the next 12 months, and exclude approximately $6.2 million of
proceeds resulting from a real estate transaction accounted for as a financing arrangement, as discussed above, which are
expected to be recognized on the Company’s Statement of Operations during the year ending July 31, 2021 as a result of the
anticipated resolution of continuing involvement, with no associated cash outflow.
92
Aggregate maturities for debt outstanding, including capital lease obligations, as of July 31, 2020 reflected by fiscal year are as
follows (in thousands):
2021 (1)
2022
2023
2024
2025
Thereafter
Total debt
Total
69,827
115,195
63,740
63,796
1,612,120
519,570
2,444,248
$
$
(1) Includes approximately $6.2 million of proceeds resulting from a real estate transaction accounted for as a financing
arrangement, as discussed above, which are expected to be recognized on the Company’s Statement of Operations during the
year ending July 31, 2021 as a result of the anticipated resolution of continuing involvement, with no associated cash outflow.
The Company recorded interest expense of $106.7 million, $79.5 million and $63.2 million for the years ended July 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018, respectively, of which $1.9 million, $1.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively, was amortization of deferred
financing costs. The Company was in compliance with all of its financial and operating covenants required to be maintained under
its debt instruments for all periods presented.
In connection with the acquisition of Whistler Blackcomb, VHI funded a portion of the purchase price through an intercompany
loan to Whistler Blackcomb of $210.0 million, which was effective as of November 1, 2016 and requires foreign currency
remeasurement to Canadian dollars, the functional currency for Whistler Blackcomb. As a result, foreign currency fluctuations
associated with the loan are recorded within the Company’s results of operations. The Company recognized approximately $3.2
million, $2.9 million and $9.0 million of non-cash foreign currency loss on the intercompany loan to Whistler Blackcomb during
the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
7.
Acquisitions
Peak Resorts
On September 24, 2019, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Peak
Resorts, Inc. (“Peak Resorts”) at a purchase price of $11.00 per share or approximately $264.5 million. In addition,
contemporaneous with the closing of the transaction, Peak Resorts was required to pay approximately $70.2 million of certain
outstanding debt instruments and lease obligations in order to complete the transaction. Accordingly, the total purchase price,
including the repayment of certain outstanding debt instruments and lease obligations, was approximately $334.7 million, for
which the Company borrowed approximately $335.6 million under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement (see Note 6, Long-Term
Debt) to fund the acquisition, repayment of debt instruments and lease obligations, and associated acquisition related expenses.
The newly acquired resorts include: Mount Snow in Vermont; Hunter Mountain in New York; Attitash Mountain Resort, Wildcat
Mountain and Crotched Mountain in New Hampshire; Liberty Mountain Resort, Roundtop Mountain Resort, Whitetail Resort,
Jack Frost and Big Boulder in Pennsylvania; Alpine Valley, Boston Mills, Brandywine and Mad River Mountain in Ohio; Hidden
Valley and Snow Creek in Missouri; and Paoli Peaks in Indiana. The Company assumed the Special Use Permits from the U.S.
Forest Service for Attitash, Mount Snow and Wildcat Mountain, and assumed the land leases for Mad River and Paoli Peaks. The
acquisition included the mountain operations of the resorts, including base area skier services (food and beverage, retail and rental,
lift ticket offices and ski and snowboard school facilities), as well as lodging operations at certain resorts.
93
The following summarizes the purchase consideration and the preliminary purchase price allocation to estimated fair values of
the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date the transaction was effective (in thousands):
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Identifiable intangible assets
Other assets
Assumed long-term debt
Other liabilities
Net assets acquired
Acquisition Date
Estimated Fair
Value
$
$
19,578
427,793
135,879
19,221
16,203
(184,668)
(99,275)
334,731
During the three months ended July 31, 2020, the Company recorded measurement period adjustments of approximately $8.6
million primarily related to the finalization of pre-acquisition period tax returns for Peak Resorts, which decreased deferred income
taxes, net (included in other liabilities in the table above) with a corresponding decrease to goodwill, net.
Identifiable intangible assets acquired in the transaction were primarily related to trade names and property management contracts,
which had acquisition date estimated fair values of approximately $15.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The process of
estimating the fair value of the depreciable property, plant, and equipment includes the use of certain estimates and assumptions
related to replacement cost. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to expected synergies, the assembled
workforce of the resorts and other factors, and is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. The Company assumed
various debt obligations of Peak Resorts, which were recorded at their respective estimated fair values as of the acquisition date
(see Note 6, Long-Term Debt). The Company incurred $3.1 million of acquisition related expenses associated with the transaction
which were recorded within Mountain and Lodging operating expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year
ended July 31, 2020. The operating results of Peak Resorts are reported within the Mountain and Lodging segments prospectively
from the date of acquisition.
The estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Peak Resorts are preliminary and are
based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date. The Company believes that this information provides a
reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed; however, the Company is obtaining
additional information necessary to finalize those estimated fair values. Therefore, the preliminary measurements of estimated
fair values reflected are subject to change. The Company expects to finalize the valuation and complete the purchase consideration
allocation no later than one year from the acquisition date.
94
Falls Creek and Hotham Resorts
On April 4, 2019, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired ski field leases and related infrastructure used to
operate two resorts in Victoria, Australia. The Company acquired Australian Alpine Enterprises Holdings Pty. Ltd and all related
corporate entities that operate the Falls Creek and Hotham resorts from Living and Leisure Australia Group, a subsidiary of Merlin
Entertainments, for a cash purchase price of approximately AU$178.9 million ($127.4 million), after adjustments for certain
agreed-upon terms, including an increase in the purchase price for operating losses incurred for the period from December 29,
2018 through closing. The acquisition included the mountain operations of both resorts, including base area skier services (ski
and snowboard school facilities, retail and rental, reservation and property management operations).
The following summarizes the purchase consideration and the purchase price allocation to estimated fair values of the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date the transaction was effective (in thousands):
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Identifiable intangible assets and other assets
Liabilities
Net assets acquired
Acquisition Date
Estimated Fair
Value
$
$
6,986
54,889
71,538
5,833
(11,894)
127,352
Identifiable intangible assets acquired in the transaction were primarily related to trade names. The process of estimating the fair
value of the property, plant, and equipment includes the use of certain estimates and assumptions related to replacement cost and
physical condition at the time of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate estimated fair values of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is attributable primarily to expected synergies,
the assembled workforce of Falls Creek and Hotham and other factors. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes under Australian tax law. The Company recognized $4.6 million of acquisition related expenses associated
with the transaction, including stamp duty expense of $2.9 million, within Mountain and Lodging operating expense in its
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended July 31, 2019. The operating results of Falls Creek and Hotham are
reported within the Mountain segment prospectively from the date of acquisition.
Stevens Pass Resort
On August 15, 2018, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired Stevens Pass Resort in the State of Washington
from Ski Resort Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Oz Real Estate (“Ski Resort Holdings”), for total cash consideration of $64.0
million, after adjustments for certain agreed-upon terms. The Company borrowed $70.0 million on August 15, 2018 under its Vail
Holdings Credit Agreement term loan (see Note 6, Long-Term Debt) to fund the transaction and associated acquisition related
expenses. The acquisition included the mountain operations of the resort, including base area skier services (food and beverage,
retail and rental, lift ticket offices and ski and snowboard school facilities).
The following summarizes the purchase consideration and the purchase price allocation to estimated fair values of the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date the transaction was effective (in thousands):
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Identifiable intangible assets
Deferred income taxes, net
Liabilities
Net assets acquired
95
Acquisition Date
Estimated Fair
Value
$
$
752
34,865
28,878
2,680
886
(4,029)
64,032
The process of estimating the fair value of the property, plant, and equipment includes the use of certain estimates and assumptions
related to replacement cost and physical condition at the time of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate
estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is attributable
primarily to expected synergies, the assembled workforce of Stevens Pass and other factors, and is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes. The Company recognized $1.2 million of acquisition related expenses associated with the transaction within
Mountain and Lodging operating expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended July 31, 2019. The
operating results of Stevens Pass are reported within the Mountain segment prospectively from the date of acquisition.
Triple Peaks
On September 27, 2018, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired Triple Peaks, LLC (“Triple Peaks”), the
parent company of Okemo Mountain Resort in Vermont, Crested Butte Mountain Resort in Colorado, and Mount Sunapee Resort
in New Hampshire, for a cash purchase price of approximately $74.1 million, after adjustments for certain agreed-upon terms. In
addition, contemporaneous with the closing of the transaction, Triple Peaks paid $155.0 million to pay the remaining obligations
of the leases that all three resorts had with Ski Resort Holdings, with funds provided by the Company. Accordingly, the total
purchase price, including the repayment of lease obligations, was $229.1 million, for which the Company utilized cash on hand
and borrowed $195.6 million under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement term loan (see Note 6, Long-Term Debt) to fund the
transaction and associated acquisition related expenses. The Company obtained a new Special Use Permit from the U.S. Forest
Service for Crested Butte, and assumed the state land leases for Okemo and Mount Sunapee. The acquisition included the mountain
operations of the resorts, including base area skier services (food and beverage, retail and rental, lift ticket offices and ski and
snowboard school facilities).
The following summarizes the purchase consideration and the purchase price allocation to estimated fair values of the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date the transaction was effective (in thousands):
Current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill
Identifiable intangible assets
Deferred income taxes, net
Liabilities
Net assets acquired
Acquisition Date
Estimated Fair
Value
$
$
5,197
159,799
51,742
27,360
3,093
(18,098)
229,093
Identifiable intangible assets acquired in the transaction were primarily related to property management contracts and trade names.
The process of estimating the fair value of the property, plant, and equipment includes the use of certain estimates and assumptions
related to replacement cost and physical condition at the time of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate
estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recognized is attributable
primarily to expected synergies, the assembled workforce of the resorts and other factors, and is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes. The Company recognized $2.8 million of acquisition related expenses associated with the transaction within
Mountain and Lodging operating expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended July 31, 2019. The
operating results of Triple Peaks are reported within the Mountain and Lodging segments prospectively from the date of acquisition.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information of the Company as if the acquisitions of Peak
Resorts, Falls Creek and Hotham, Stevens Pass and Triple Peaks were completed at the beginning of the fiscal year preceding the
respective fiscal year in which each acquisition occurred. The following unaudited pro forma financial information includes
adjustments for (i) depreciation on acquired property, plant and equipment; (ii) amortization of intangible assets recorded at the
date of the transactions; (iii) lease expenses incurred by the prior owners which the Company will not be subject to; (iv) transaction
and business integration related costs; and (v) interest expense associated with financing the transactions. This unaudited pro forma
financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to be indicative of the results of future
operations or the results that would have occurred had the transaction taken place at the beginning of the fiscal year preceding the
fiscal year in which each acquisition occurred (in thousands, except per share amounts).
96
Pro forma net revenue
Pro forma net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Pro forma basic net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Pro forma diluted net income per share attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
8.
Supplementary Balance Sheet Information
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
1,970,363 $
100,205 $
2.49 $
2.45 $
2,490,809
301,234
7.47
7.32
$
$
$
$
The composition of property, plant and equipment, including capital lease assets, follows (in thousands):
Land and land improvements
Buildings and building improvements
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Software
Vehicles
Construction in progress
Gross property, plant and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Property, plant and equipment, net
July 31,
2020
2019
$
750,714 $
1,475,661
1,361,178
308,267
104,223
80,510
81,967
4,162,520
(1,969,841)
2,192,679 $
$
619,561
1,284,438
1,160,817
309,271
118,815
65,556
79,282
3,637,740
(1,795,240)
1,842,500
Depreciation expense, which included depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases, for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019
and 2018 totaled $243.1 million, $210.7 million and $199.2 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the composition of property, plant and equipment recorded under finance leases as of July 31,
2020 and 2019 (in thousands):
Land
Land improvements
Buildings and building improvements
Machinery and equipment
Gross property, plant and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Property, plant and equipment, net
July 31,
2020
2019
31,818 $
49,228
42,160
60,384
183,590
(65,792)
117,798 $
31,818
49,228
42,160
60,384
183,590
(56,040)
127,550
$
$
97
The composition of goodwill and intangible assets follows (in thousands):
Goodwill
Goodwill
Accumulated impairments
Accumulated amortization
Goodwill, net
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks
Other
Total gross indefinite-lived intangible assets
Accumulated amortization
Indefinite-lived intangible assets, net
Amortizable intangible assets
Trademarks
Other
Total gross amortizable intangible assets
Accumulated amortization
Amortizable intangible assets, net
Total gross intangible assets
Total accumulated amortization
Total intangible assets, net
July 31,
2020
2019
1,752,062 $
(25,688)
(17,354)
1,709,020 $
1,625,560
—
(17,354)
1,608,206
230,000 $
41,667
271,667
(24,713)
246,954 $
38,208 $
70,772
108,980
(41,158)
67,822
380,647
(65,871)
314,776 $
215,905
42,166
258,071
(24,713)
233,358
42,108
67,538
109,646
(36,831)
72,815
367,717
(61,544)
306,173
$
$
$
$
$
$
Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 totaled $6.5
million, $7.4 million and $5.3 million, respectively, and is estimated to be approximately $4.3 million annually, on average, for
the next five fiscal years.
The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill allocated between the Company’s segments for the years ended July 31, 2020
and 2019 are as follows (in thousands):
Balance at July 31, 2018
Acquisitions (including measurement period adjustments)
Effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
Balance at July 31, 2019
Acquisitions (including measurement period adjustments)
Asset impairments
Effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
Balance at July 31, 2020
Asset Impairments
Mountain
Lodging
Goodwill, net
$
$
1,407,787 $
152,049
(19,529)
1,540,307
135,987
—
(9,485)
1,666,809 $
67,899 $
—
—
67,899
—
(25,688)
—
42,211 $
1,475,686
152,049
(19,529)
1,608,206
135,987
(25,688)
(9,485)
1,709,020
The Company recorded asset impairments during the year ended July 31, 2020 of $28.4 million, with corresponding reductions
to goodwill, net of $25.7 million and intangible assets, net and property, plant and equipment, net of $2.7 million. These asset
impairments encompass various estimates and assumptions about fair value, which are based predominately on significant
unobservable inputs.
98
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact it has had on the Company’s operations during the year ended July 31,
2020, and the expected continuing impact of the pandemic on future operations, the Company determined that the estimated fair
value of its Colorado resort ground transportation company reporting unit within its Lodging segment no longer exceeded its
carrying value. Additionally, the Company determined that certain long-lived assets of its Colorado resort ground transportation
company were not recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized impairments of goodwill of approximately $25.7 million
and intangible assets and long-lived assets of $2.7 million, which were recorded within asset impairments on the Company’s
Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended July 31, 2020.
The Company estimated the fair value of its Colorado resort ground transportation company reporting unit based on an analysis
of the present value of future cash flows (an income approach). The significant estimates used in the discounted cash flow model
included the Company’s weighted average cost of capital for the reporting unit, projected cash flows and the long-term rate of
growth, all of which are significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The Company’s assumptions were based on the actual historical
performance of the reporting unit, taking into account the recent weakening of operating results and the expected continuation of
operating results for transportation services. As a result of this impairment, the Company’s Colorado ground transportation company
had no remaining goodwill recorded as of July 31, 2020.
The composition of accounts payable and accrued liabilities follows (in thousands):
Trade payables
Deferred revenue
Accrued salaries, wages and deferred compensation
Accrued benefits
Deposits
Operating lease liabilities
Other accruals
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities
The composition of other long-term liabilities follows (in thousands):
Private club deferred initiation fee revenue
Unfavorable lease obligation, net
Other long-term liabilities
Total other long-term liabilities
9.
Investments in Affiliates
July 31,
2020
2019
59,692 $
256,402
25,588
43,704
20,070
36,604
57,048
499,108 $
96,377
335,669
50,318
37,797
32,108
—
55,588
607,857
July 31,
2020
2019
105,108 $
1,651
163,486
270,245 $
109,749
19,017
154,835
283,601
$
$
$
$
The Company held the following investments in equity method affiliates as of July 31, 2020:
Equity Method Affiliates
Slifer, Smith, and Frampton/Vail Associates Real Estate, LLC (“SSF/VARE”)
KRED
Clinton Ditch and Reservoir Company
Ownership
Interest
50%
50%
43%
The Company had total net investments in equity method affiliates of $10.2 million and $8.8 million as of July 31, 2020 and 2019,
respectively, included within deferred charges and other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount
of retained earnings that represent undistributed earnings of 50% or less owned entities accounted for by the equity method was
$6.5 million and $5.4 million as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. During the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,
distributions in the amounts of $0.7 million, $1.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively, were received from equity method affiliates.
99
10.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company utilizes FASB issued fair value guidance that establishes how reporting entities should measure fair value for
measurement and disclosure purposes. The guidance establishes a common definition of fair value applicable to all assets and
liabilities measured at fair value and prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Accordingly, the
Company uses valuation techniques which maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when determining fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1: Inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active and inactive markets or that are observable for the
asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The table below summarizes the Company’s cash equivalents, other current assets, Interest Rate Swaps and Contingent
Consideration measured at their estimated fair values (all other assets and liabilities measured at fair value are immaterial) (in
thousands):
Description
Assets:
Money Market
Commercial Paper
Certificates of Deposit
Liabilities:
Interest Rate Swaps
Contingent Consideration
Description
Assets:
Money Market
Commercial Paper
Certificates of Deposit
Liabilities:
Contingent Consideration
Estimated Fair Value Measurement as of July 31, 2020
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
203,158 $
203,158 $
2,401 $
8,208 $
22,510 $
17,800 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
— $
2,401 $
8,208 $
22,510 $
— $
—
—
—
—
17,800
Estimated Fair Value Measurement as of July 31, 2019
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
3,043 $
2,401 $
7,871 $
3,043 $
— $
— $
— $
2,401 $
7,871 $
—
—
—
27,200 $
— $
— $
27,200
The Company’s cash equivalents, other current assets and Interest Rate Swaps are measured utilizing quoted market prices or
pricing models whereby all significant inputs are either observable or corroborated by observable market data. During the year
ended July 31, 2020, the Company entered into the Interest Rate Swaps to hedge the LIBOR-based variable interest rate component
of $400.0 million in principal amount of its Vail Holdings Credit Agreement. Changes in the estimated fair value are recognized
in change in estimated fair value of hedging instruments on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Such amounts are reclassified into interest expense, net from other comprehensive income during the period in which the hedged
item affects earnings. The estimated fair value of the Interest Rate Swaps are included within other long-term liabilities on the
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2020.
100
The changes in Contingent Consideration during the years ended July 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at July 31, 2018
Payment
Change in estimated fair value
Balance at July 31, 2019
Payment
Change in estimated fair value
Balance at July 31, 2020
Contingent
Consideration
$
$
21,900
(67)
5,367
27,200
(6,436)
(2,964)
17,800
The Lease for Park City, as discussed in Note 6, Long-term Debt, provides for participating contingent payments (the “Contingent
Consideration”) to the landlord of 42% of the amount by which EBITDA for the Park City resort operations, as calculated under
the Lease, exceeds approximately $35 million, as established at the transaction date, with such threshold amount subsequently
increased annually by an inflation linked index and a 10% adjustment for any capital improvements or investments made under
the Lease by the Company. The estimated fair value of Contingent Consideration includes the future period resort operations of
Park City in the calculation of EBITDA on which participating contingent payments are made, which is determined on the basis
of estimated performance for the years ending July 31, 2021 and July 31, 2022, escalated by an assumed long-term growth factor
and discounted to net present value. The Company estimated the fair value of the Contingent Consideration payments using an
option pricing valuation model. Key assumptions included Park City EBITDA for the year ending July 31, 2022, an assumed long-
term growth rate, a discount rate of 10.49% and volatility of 17.0%, which are unobservable inputs and thus are considered Level
3 inputs. The Company prepared a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the effect that changes on certain key assumptions would have
on the estimated fair value of the Contingent Consideration. A change in the discount rate of 100 basis points or a 5% change in
estimated future performance would result in a change in the estimated fair value within the range of approximately $2.9 million
to $4.1 million.
Contingent Consideration is classified as a liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and is remeasured to an estimated fair
value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. During the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company made a payment
to the landlord for Contingent Consideration of approximately $6.4 million and recorded a decrease in the estimated fair value of
approximately $3.0 million primarily related to changes in the expected Contingent Consideration payments for the year ended
July 31, 2020 and the year ending July 31, 2021, and other key assumptions noted above, resulting in an estimated fair value of
the Contingent Consideration of $17.8 million as of July 31, 2020, which is reflected in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
and other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
11.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to taxation in U.S. federal, state, and local jurisdictions and various non-U.S. jurisdictions, including
Australia and Canada. The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by the tax laws, regulations, practices and interpretations in
the jurisdictions in which it operates and may fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on, among other things, the
geographic mix of the Company’s profits and losses, changes in tax laws and regulations or their application and interpretation,
the outcome of tax audits and changes in valuation allowances associated with the Company’s deferred tax assets.
On March 27, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government enacted legislation commonly referred to as
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The CARES Act includes various amendments to
the U.S. tax code that impacted the Company’s accounting and reporting for income taxes during the year ended July 31, 2020,
and the Company expects these amendments will continue to impact its accounting and reporting for income taxes in the future.
The primary provisions of the CARES Act that the Company has been impacted by include:
•
allowing a carryback of the entire amount of eligible Federal net operating losses (“NOLs”) generated in calendar years
2018, 2019 and 2020 for up to five years prior to when such losses were incurred, representing a change from previous
rules under the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”), in which NOLs could not be carried back to prior years and
utilization was limited to 80% of taxable income in future years. Under the CARES Act, the Company was permitted to
carry back its pre-existing NOLs to tax years prior to the enactment of the TCJA and obtain an incremental benefit of
$3.8 million related to the differential in federal tax rates between years that NOLs were generated and years that the
NOLs will be carried back to;
101
•
•
treatment of certain qualified improvement property (“QIP”) as 15-year property and allowing such QIP placed in service
after December 31, 2017 to be eligible for bonus depreciation, which could incrementally add to its pre-existing NOLs;
and
increases in the allowable business interest deduction from 30% of adjusted taxable income to 50% of adjusted taxable
income for calendar years 2019 and 2020.
The CARES Act also provides refundable employee retention credits and defers the requirement to remit the employer-paid portion
of social security payroll taxes. As a result, during the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company recorded a benefit of approximately
$9.6 million, which primarily offset Mountain and Lodging operating expense as a result of wages paid to employees who were
not providing services. Additionally, the Company deferred payment of the employer-paid portion of social security payroll taxes
through the end of calendar year 2020 and will remit such amounts in equal installments during calendar years 2021 and 2022.
The Company also recognized a benefit of approximately $8.5 million during the year ended July 31, 2020 as a result of the recent
Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy and Australian JobKeeper legislation for its Canadian and Australian employees, which primarily
offset Mountain and Lodging operating expense.
U.S. and foreign components of income before (provision) benefit from income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
U.S.
Foreign
Income before income taxes
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
$
89,838 $
26,595
116,433 $
306,323 $
92,642
398,965 $
264,379
75,713
340,092
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and
assets are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Fixed assets
Intangible assets
Operating lease right of use assets
Other
Total
Deferred income tax assets:
Canyons obligation
Stock-based compensation
Investment in Partnerships
Deferred compensation and other accrued benefits
Contingent Consideration
Unfavorable lease obligation, net
Net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits
Operating lease liabilities
Other, net
Total
Valuation allowance for deferred income taxes
Deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance
Net deferred income tax liability
102
July 31,
2020
2019
216,016 $
86,509
53,727
13,709
369,961
14,997
10,313
12,400
9,918
4,468
285
13,205
60,838
21,427
147,851
(5,330)
142,521
227,440 $
153,182
73,146
—
13,425
239,753
13,922
9,620
13,281
10,674
6,771
4,896
5,631
—
18,850
83,645
(5,365)
78,280
161,473
$
$
The components of deferred income taxes recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred income tax asset
Deferred income tax liability
Net deferred income tax liability
July 31,
2020
2019
$
$
6,751 $
234,191
227,440 $
7,286
168,759
161,473
Significant components of the provision (benefit) from income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
Current:
Federal
State
Foreign
Total current
Deferred:
Federal
State
Foreign
Total deferred
Provision (benefit) from income taxes
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
$
$
(13,467) $
(731)
4,141
(10,057)
12,597
4,266
572
17,435
7,378 $
24,309 $
8,539
20,205
53,053
16,983
5,282
154
22,419
75,472 $
(43,366)
9,562
18,436
(15,368)
(45,922)
2,941
(2,789)
(45,770)
(61,138)
A reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) from continuing operations and the amount computed by applying the United
States federal statutory income tax rate to income before income taxes is as follows:
At U.S. federal income tax rate
State income tax, net of federal benefit
Change in uncertain tax positions
Change in valuation allowance
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
Impacts of the Tax Act and other legislative changes
Noncontrolling interests
Foreign rate differential
Other
Effective tax rate
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
21.0 %
3.5 %
(3.8)%
— %
(7.1)%
(3.2)%
(2.4)%
(2.4)%
0.7 %
6.3 %
21.0 %
2.8 %
(1.6)%
— %
(3.0)%
— %
(1.5)%
0.4 %
0.8 %
18.9 %
26.8 %
3.0 %
— %
0.3 %
(20.9)%
(24.7)%
(1.7)%
(1.5)%
0.7 %
(18.0)%
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions, excluding
associated deferred tax benefits and accrued interest and penalties, if applicable, is as follows (in thousands):
Balance, beginning of year
Additions for tax positions of prior years
Lapse of statute of limitations
Balance, end of year
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
$
72,222 $
16,654
(18,577)
70,299 $
78,242 $
11,520
(17,540)
72,222 $
76,111
12,394
(10,263)
78,242
103
As of July 31, 2020, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions relate to the treatment of
the Talisker lease payments as payments of debt obligations and that the tax basis in Canyons goodwill is deductible, and are
included within “other long-term liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company experienced a reduction in the uncertain tax positions due to the lapse of the
statute of limitations of $18.6 million, which was partially offset with an increase to the uncertain tax position of $16.7 million.
Interest and penalties associated with the statute of limitations lapse were approximately $3.1 million. The Company is not aware
of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially
in the next twelve months. Additionally, the Company expects a reduction to its uncertain tax positions for the fiscal year ending
July 31, 2021, due to the lapse of the statute of limitations. As of July 31, 2020 and 2019, accrued interest and penalties, net of
tax, was $6.2 million and $6.3 million, respectively. For the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized
income tax (benefit) expense of ($0.1 million), $1.1 million and $1.6 million of interest (benefit) expense and penalties, net of
tax, respectively.
The Company’s major tax jurisdictions in which it files income tax returns are the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions,
Australia, and Canada. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations for tax years prior to 2015. With few
exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to examination by various U.S. state jurisdictions for tax years prior to 2014.
Additionally, the Company is no longer subject to audits for the tax years prior to 2015 for Australia and Canada.
The Company has NOL carryforwards totaling $58.6 million, primarily comprised of $49.8 million of federal and state NOLs as
a result of the acquisition of Peak Resorts in September 2019 that will expire beginning July 31, 2032, $4.9 million of historical
state NOLs that will expire by July 31, 2032 and non-U.S. NOLs of $3.9 million that will carry forward indefinitely. In connection
with Peak Resorts’ initial public offering in November 2014, as well as the Company’s acquisition of Peak Resorts in September
2019, Peak Resorts had two ownership changes pursuant to the provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. As a result, the Company’s
usage of its eligible Federal NOL carryforwards will be limited each year by these ownership changes; however, management
believes the full benefit of those carryforwards will be realized prior to their respective expiration dates. As of July 31, 2020, the
Company has recorded a valuation allowance on $3.9 million of the historical non-U.S. NOL carryforwards, as the Company has
determined that it is more likely than not that the associated NOL carryforwards will not be realized. Additionally, the Company
has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $4.2 million, which expire by the year ending July 31, 2028. As of July 31, 2020, the
Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $4.2 million on foreign tax credit carryforwards, as the Company has determined
that it is more likely than not that these foreign tax credit carryforwards will not be realized.
The Company may be required to record additional valuation allowances if, among other things, adverse economic conditions,
including those caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, negatively impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets.
Evaluating and estimating the Company’s tax provision, current and deferred tax assets and liabilities and other tax accruals
requires significant management judgment. The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings, if any, in its
Canadian foreign subsidiaries. It is not practical at this time to determine the income tax liability related to any remaining
undistributed earnings.
12.
Related Party Transactions
The Company has the right to appoint four of nine directors of the Beaver Creek Resort Company of Colorado (“BCRC”), a non-
profit entity formed for the benefit of property owners and certain others in Beaver Creek. The Company has a management
agreement with the BCRC, renewable for one-year periods, to provide management services on a fixed fee basis. Management
fees and reimbursement of operating expenses paid to the Company under its agreement with the BCRC during the years ended
July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $8.3 million, $9.6 million and $9.2 million, respectively.
104
13.
Commitments and Contingencies
Metropolitan Districts
The Company credit-enhances $6.3 million of bonds issued by Holland Creek Metropolitan District (“HCMD”) through a $6.4
million letter of credit issued under the Vail Holdings Credit Agreement. HCMD’s bonds were issued and used to build infrastructure
associated with the Company’s Red Sky Ranch residential development. The Company has agreed to pay capital improvement
fees to Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District (“RSRMD”) until RSRMD’s revenue streams from property taxes are sufficient to
meet debt service requirements under HCMD’s bonds. The Company recorded a liability of $2.1 million and $2.0 million, primarily
within other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively,
with respect to the estimated present value of future RSRMD capital improvement fees. The Company estimates that it will make
capital improvement fee payments under this arrangement through the year ending July 31, 2031.
Guarantees/Indemnifications
As of July 31, 2020, the Company had various other letters of credit outstanding totaling $75.5 million, consisting of $53.4 million
to support the Employee Housing Bonds and $22.1 million primarily for workers’ compensation, a wind energy purchase agreement
and insurance-related deductibles. The Company also had surety bonds of $9.6 million as of July 31, 2020, primarily to provide
collateral for its U.S. workers compensation self-insurance programs.
In addition to the guarantees noted above, the Company has entered into contracts in the normal course of business that include
certain indemnifications under which it could be required to make payments to third parties upon the occurrence or non-occurrence
of certain future events. These indemnities include indemnities related to licensees in connection with third-parties’ use of the
Company’s trademarks and logos, liabilities associated with the infringement of other parties’ technology and software products,
liabilities associated with the use of easements, liabilities associated with employment of contract workers and the Company’s
use of trustees, and liabilities associated with the Company’s use of public lands and environmental matters. The duration of these
indemnities generally is indefinite and generally do not limit the future payments the Company could be obligated to make.
As permitted under applicable law, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have agreed to indemnify their directors and officers
over their lifetimes for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving the Company or its subsidiaries
in such a capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that should enable
the Company to recover a portion of any amounts paid.
Unless otherwise noted, the Company has not recorded any significant liabilities for the letters of credit, indemnities and other
guarantees noted above in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, either because the Company has recorded on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets the underlying liability associated with the guarantee, the guarantee is with respect to the Company’s
own performance and is therefore not subject to the measurement requirements as prescribed by GAAP, or because the Company
has calculated the estimated fair value of the indemnification or guarantee to be immaterial based on the current facts and
circumstances that would trigger a payment under the indemnification clause. In addition, with respect to certain indemnifications
it is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under these potential obligations due to the unique set
of facts and circumstances likely to be involved in each particular claim and indemnification provision. Historically, payments
made by the Company under these obligations have not been material.
As noted above, the Company makes certain indemnifications to licensees for their use of the Company’s trademarks and logos.
The Company does not record any liabilities with respect to these indemnifications.
105
Commitments
The operations of Northstar are conducted on land and with operating assets owned by affiliates of EPR Properties, a real-estate
investment trust, primarily under operating leases which were assumed in the acquisition of Northstar by the Company. The leases
provide for the payment of a minimum annual base rent over the lease term which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining lease term from the date of assumption. In addition, the leases provide for the payment of percentage rent of certain
gross revenues generated at the property over a revenue threshold which is incrementally adjusted annually. The initial term of
the leases expires in fiscal 2027 and allows for three 10-year extensions at the Company’s option. The operations of Perisher are
conducted on land under a license and lease granted by the Office of Environment and Heritage, an agency of the New South
Wales government, which initially commenced in 2008, and which the Company assumed in its acquisition of Perisher. The lease
and license has a term that expires in fiscal 2048 and allows for an option to renew for an additional 20 years. The lease and license
provide for the payment of an initial minimum annual base rent, with annual CPI increases, and percentage rent of certain gross
revenue generated at the property. The operations of Falls Creek and Hotham are conducted on land under leases granted by the
Governor of the State of Victoria, Australia and its dependencies, which initially commenced in 1991 and 1992, respectively,
which the Company assumed in its acquisition of Falls Creek and Hotham in April 2019. The leases have terms that expire in
fiscal 2041 for Falls Creek and fiscal 2058 for Hotham, and provide for the payment of rent with both a fixed and variable
component. The operations of Mad River Mountain is conducted on land under a lease granted by EPT Mad River, Inc., which
initially commenced in 2005, which the Company assumed in its acquisition of Peak Resorts in September 2019. The lease has a
term that expires in the year ending July 31, 2035, and provides for the payment of an initial minimum annual base rent, with
annual CPI increases, and percentage rent of certain gross revenue generated at the property. Additionally, the Company has entered
into strategic long-term season pass alliance agreements with third-party mountain resorts in which the Company has committed
to pay minimum revenue guarantees over the remaining terms of these agreements.
The Company has executed or assumed as lessee other operating leases for the rental of office and commercial space, employee
residential units and land primarily through fiscal 2079. Certain of these leases have renewal terms at the Company’s option,
escalation clauses, rent holidays and leasehold improvement incentives. Rent holidays and rent escalation clauses are recognized
on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leasehold improvement incentives are recorded as leasehold improvements and
amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the term of the lease. For the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the
Company recorded lease expense (including Northstar, Perisher, Falls Creek & Hotham and Mad River Mountain), excluding
executory costs, related to these agreements of $58.8 million, $57.8 million and $52.8 million, respectively, which is included in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 4 “Leases” for additional information regarding the Company’s
leasing arrangements.
Self Insurance
The Company is self-insured for claims under its U.S. health benefit plans and for the majority of workers’ compensation claims
in the U.S. Workers compensation claims in the U.S. are subject to stop loss policies. The self-insurance liability related to workers’
compensation is determined actuarially based on claims filed. The self-insurance liability related to claims under the Company’s
U.S. health benefit plans is determined based on analysis of actual claims. The amounts related to these claims are included as a
component of accrued benefits in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (see Note 8, Supplementary Balance Sheet Information).
Legal
The Company is a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the Company has
adequate insurance coverage and/or has accrued for all loss contingencies for asserted and unasserted matters deemed to be probable
losses and estimable. As of July 31, 2020 and 2019, the accruals for the above loss contingencies were not material individually
or in the aggregate.
14.
Segment and Geographic Area Information
Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments: Mountain, Lodging and Real Estate. The Company refers to “Resort” as the
combination of the Mountain and Lodging segments. The Mountain segment includes the operations of the Company’s mountain
resorts/ski areas and related ancillary activities. The Lodging segment includes the operations of the Company’s owned hotels,
RockResorts, NPS concessionaire properties, condominium management, Colorado resort ground transportation operations and
mountain resort golf operations. The Real Estate segment owns, develops and sells real estate in and around the Company’s resort
communities. The Company’s reportable segments, although integral to the success of the others, offer distinctly different products
and services and require different types of management focus. As such, these segments are managed separately.
106
The Company reports its segment results using Reported EBITDA (defined as segment net revenue less segment operating expenses,
plus or minus segment equity investment income or loss, and for the Real Estate segment, plus gain or loss on sale of real property).
The Company reports segment results in a manner consistent with management’s internal reporting of operating results to the
chief operating decision maker (Chief Executive Officer) for purposes of evaluating segment performance.
Items excluded from Reported EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Reported
EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to, or substitute for, net income, net change in cash and cash
equivalents or other financial statement data presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements as indicators of financial
performance or liquidity.
The Company utilizes Reported EBITDA in evaluating the performance of the Company and in allocating resources to its segments.
Mountain Reported EBITDA consists of Mountain net revenue less Mountain operating expense plus or minus Mountain equity
investment income or loss. Lodging Reported EBITDA consists of Lodging net revenue less Lodging operating expense. Real
Estate Reported EBITDA consists of Real Estate net revenue less Real Estate operating expense plus gain or loss on sale of real
property. All segment expenses include an allocation of corporate administrative expense. Assets are not used to evaluate
performance, except as shown in the table below. The accounting policies specific to each segment are the same as those described
in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
107
Following is key financial information by reportable segment which is used by management in evaluating performance and
allocating resources (in thousands):
Net revenue:
Lift
Ski school
Dining
Retail/rental
Other
Total Mountain net revenue
Lodging
Total Resort net revenue
Real Estate
Total net revenue
Segment operating expense:
Mountain
Lodging
Total Resort operating expense
Real Estate, net
Total segment operating expense
Gain on sale of real property
Mountain equity investment income, net
Reported EBITDA:
Mountain
Lodging
Resort
Real Estate
Total Reported EBITDA
Real estate held for sale and investment
Reconciliation of net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc. to
Total Reported EBITDA:
Net income attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income
Provision (benefit) from income taxes
Income before provision (benefit) from income taxes
Depreciation and amortization
Asset impairments
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets and other, net
Change in fair value of contingent consideration
Investment income and other, net
Foreign currency loss on intercompany loans
Interest expense, net
Total Reported EBITDA
108
2020
Year Ended July 31,
2019
2018
$
913,091 $
1,033,234 $
189,131
160,763
270,299
177,159
1,710,443
248,414
1,958,857
4,847
215,060
181,837
320,267
205,803
1,956,201
314,662
2,270,863
712
880,293
189,910
161,402
296,466
194,851
1,722,922
284,643
2,007,565
3,988
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,963,704 $
2,271,575 $
2,011,553
1,212,053 $
1,279,567 $
245,145
1,457,198
9,182
286,562
1,566,129
5,609
1,132,840
259,637
1,392,477
3,546
1,466,380 $
1,571,738 $
1,396,023
207 $
1,690 $
580 $
1,960 $
500,080 $
678,594 $
3,269
503,349
(4,128)
499,221 $
96,844 $
28,100
706,694
(4,317)
702,377 $
101,021 $
98,833 $
10,222
301,163 $
22,330
109,055
7,378
116,433
249,572
28,372
(838)
(2,964)
(1,305)
3,230
106,721
499,221 $
323,493
75,472
398,965
218,117
—
664
5,367
(3,086)
2,854
79,496
702,377 $
515
1,523
591,605
25,006
616,611
957
617,568
99,385
379,898
21,332
401,230
(61,138)
340,092
204,462
—
4,620
(1,854)
(1,944)
8,966
63,226
617,568
Geographic Information
Net revenue and property, plant and equipment, net by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
Net revenue
U.S.
International (1)
Total net revenue
Property, plant and equipment, net
U.S.
International (1)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
Year Ended July 31,
2020
2019
2018
$
$
1,655,961 $
1,865,062 $
307,743
406,513
1,963,704 $
2,271,575 $
1,610,323
401,230
2,011,553
July 31,
2020
2019
$
$
1,759,692 $
432,987
2,192,679 $
1,381,378
461,122
1,842,500
(1) The only individual international country (i.e. except the U.S.) to account for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue
and property plant and equipment, net was Canada. Canada accounted for $223.3 million, $308.1 million, and $321.0 million
of revenue for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and for $291.7 million and $319.4 million of
property, plant and equipment, net as of July 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
15.
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total net revenue
Income (loss) from operations
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vail
Resorts, Inc.
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable
to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Total net revenue
Income (loss) from operations
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vail
Resorts, Inc.
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable
to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to Vail Resorts, Inc.
Year Ended July 31, 2020
Full Year
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
1,963,704 $
223,389 $
109,055 $
77,209 $
(170,046) $
(157,965) $
694,087 $
924,638 $
218,232 $
310,733 $
159,831 $
217,018 $
267,770
(135,530)
(109,829)
98,833 $
(153,608) $
152,546 $
206,370 $
(106,475)
2.45 $
(3.82) $
3.79 $
5.12 $
2.42 $
(3.82) $
3.74 $
5.04 $
(2.64)
(2.64)
Year Ended July 31, 2019
Full Year
Fourth
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
2,271,575 $
476,269 $
323,493 $
244,006 $
(120,582) $
(92,301) $
957,987 $
849,578 $
422,598 $
301,848 $
308,530 $
217,990 $
220,004
(127,595)
(110,726)
301,163 $
(89,525) $
292,134 $
206,349 $
(107,795)
7.46 $
(2.22) $
7.26 $
5.12 $
(2.66)
7.32 $
(2.22) $
7.12 $
5.02 $
(2.66)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
109
16.
Share Repurchase Program
On March 9, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, authorizing the Company to repurchase
up to 3,000,000 Vail Shares. On July 16, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the authorization by an additional
3,000,000 Vail Shares, and on December 4, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the authorization by an additional
1,500,000 Vail Shares for a total authorization to repurchase shares of up to 7,500,000 Vail Shares. During the year ended July 31,
2020, the Company repurchased 256,418 Vail Shares (at a total cost of $46.4 million). During the year ended July 31, 2019, the
Company repurchased 353,007 Vail Shares (at a total cost of $85.0 million). During the year ended July 31, 2018, the Company
repurchased 115,422 Vail Shares (at a total cost of $25.8 million). Since inception of this stock repurchase program through July 31,
2020, the Company has repurchased 6,161,141 shares at a cost of approximately $404.4 million. As of July 31, 2020, 1,338,859
Vail Shares remained available to repurchase under the existing share repurchase program, which has no expiration date. Vail
Shares purchased pursuant to the repurchase program will be held as treasury shares and may be used for issuance under the
Company’s employee share award plan.
17.
Stock Compensation Plan
The Company has a share award plan (the “Plan”) which has been approved by the Company’s stockholders. Under the Plan, up
to 4.4 million shares of common stock could be issued in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted
share units, performance shares, performance share units, dividend equivalents or other share-based awards to employees, directors
or consultants of the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates. The terms of awards granted under the Plan, including exercise
price, vesting period and life, are set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. All share-based awards (except
for restricted shares and restricted share units) granted under the Plan have a life of ten years. Most awards vest ratably over three
years; however, some have been granted with different vesting schedules. Of the awards outstanding, none have been granted to
non-employees (except those granted to non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company) under the Plan. At
July 31, 2020, approximately 3.2 million share based awards were available to be granted under the Plan.
The fair value of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) granted in the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were
estimated on the date of grant using a lattice-based option valuation model that applies the assumptions noted in the table below.
A lattice-based model considers factors such as exercise behavior, and assumes employees will exercise equity awards at different
times over the contractual life of the equity awards. As a lattice-based model considers these factors, and is more flexible, the
Company considers it to be a better method of valuing equity awards than a closed-form Black-Scholes model. Because lattice-
based option valuation models incorporate ranges of assumptions for inputs, those ranges are disclosed. Expected volatility is
based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate equity award exercises and
employee terminations within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior
are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of equity awards granted is derived from the output of the
option valuation model and represents the period of time that equity awards granted are expected to be outstanding; the range
given below results from certain groups of employees exhibiting different behavior. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the equity award is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Expected volatility
Expected dividends
Expected term (average in years)
Risk-free rate
2020
29.7%
2.8%
6.5-7.1
1.8-2.0%
Year Ended July 31,
2019
38.6%
2.1%
6.0-6.6
2.4-2.9%
2018
40.0%
2.0%
5.8-6.4
1.2-2.3%
The Company records actual forfeitures related to unvested awards upon employee terminations.
110
A summary of aggregate SARs award activity under the Plan as of July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, and changes during the years
then ended is presented below (in thousands, except exercise price and contractual term):
Awards
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at August 1, 2017
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at July 31, 2018
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at July 31, 2019
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited or expired
Outstanding at July 31, 2020
Vested and expected to vest at July 31, 2020
Exercisable at July 31, 2020
2,290 $
86 $
(1,049) $
(3) $
1,324 $
80 $
(219) $
(14) $
1,171 $
146 $
(247) $
(9) $
1,061 $
1,042 $
846 $
59.12
237.86
33.25
172.03
91.01
293.82
49.09
217.58
111.12
245.26
67.19
252.75
138.59
136.66
108.73
5.0 years
4.9 years
4.1 years
$
$
$
75,736
75,736
75,736
The weighted-average grant-date estimated fair value of SARs granted during the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was
$58.25, $98.19 and $78.07, respectively. The total intrinsic value of SARs exercised during the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019
and 2018 was $35.0 million, $41.2 million and $213.8 million, respectively. The Company had 91,000, 131,000 and 169,000 SARs
that vested during the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These awards had a total estimated fair value of
$2.6 million, $15.2 million and $18.5 million at the date of vesting for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested SARs as of July 31, 2020 and changes during the year then ended is presented
below (in thousands, except fair value amounts):
Outstanding at July 31, 2019
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at July 31, 2020
Awards
168
146
(91)
(8)
215
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
$
80.75
58.25
71.57
79.23
69.45
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted share units as of July 31, 2020 and changes during the year then
ended is presented below (in thousands, except fair value amounts):
Nonvested at July 31, 2019
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at July 31, 2020
111
Awards
126
83
(63)
(16)
130
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
$
230.10
217.46
216.07
229.97
228.77
The Company granted 83,000 restricted share units during the year ended July 31, 2020 with a weighted-average grant-date
estimated fair value of $217.46. The Company granted 68,000 restricted share units during the year ended July 31, 2019 with a
weighted-average grant-date estimated fair value of $264.44. The Company granted 77,000 restricted share units during the year
ended July 31, 2018 with a weighted-average grant-date estimated fair value of $215.14. The Company had 63,000, 102,000 and
101,000 restricted share units that vested during the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These units had a
total estimated fair value of $14.8 million, $28.8 million and $23.5 million at the date of vesting for the years ended July 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018, respectively.
As of July 31, 2020, there was $25.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested share-based
compensation arrangements granted under the Plan, of which $15.7 million, $9.0 million and $1.2 million of expense is expected
to be recognized in the years ending July 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively, assuming no share-based awards are granted in
the future or forfeited. The tax benefit realized or expected to be realized from SARs exercised and restricted stock units vested
was $12.3 million, $16.3 million and $79.7 million for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The Company has a policy of using either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares, including shares acquired by purchase
in the open market, to satisfy equity award exercises.
18.
Retirement and Profit Sharing Plans
The Company maintains a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”), qualified under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code, for its U.S. employees. Under this Retirement Plan, U.S. employees are eligible to make before-tax
contributions on the first day of the calendar month following the later of: (i) their employment commencement date or (ii) the
date they turn 21. Participants may contribute up to 100% of their qualifying annual compensation up to the annual maximum
specified by the Internal Revenue Code. When the Company participates in 401(k) contribution matching, it matches an amount
equal to 50% of each participant’s contribution up to 6% of a participant’s bi-weekly qualifying compensation starting the pay
period containing the first day of the month after obtaining the later of: (i) 12 months of employment with at least 1,000 service
hours from the commencement date or (ii) if 1,000 hours within the first 12 months was not completed, then after the employee
completed a cumulative 1,500 service hours. On April 1, 2020, the Company announced a temporary six month suspension of its
401(k) contribution matching as a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting resort closures. Additionally,
the Company’s matching contribution is entirely discretionary and may be reduced or eliminated at any time.
Total Retirement Plan expense recognized by the Company for the years ended July 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $5.8 million,
$7.9 million and $6.9 million, respectively.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
ITEM 9.
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), have evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. The
term “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures established by the Company that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management, including its CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based upon their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the CEO and the CFO concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, the disclosure controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
112
disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.
The Company, including its CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Company’s controls and procedures will prevent or detect all
error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The report of management required by this item is contained in Item 8. of this Form 10-K under the caption “Management’s Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report required by this item is contained in Item 8. of this Form 10-K under the caption “Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 31, 2020 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
During the year ended July 31, 2020, the Company implemented certain internal controls in connection with its adoption of the
new lease accounting standard. There were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during its most recent fiscal year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III
We expect to file with the SEC in October 2020 (and, in any event, not later than 120 days after the close of our last fiscal year),
a definitive Proxy Statement, pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held
in December 2020.
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
2020 annual meeting of stockholders under the sections entitled “Information with Respect to Nominees,” “Management” and
“Corporate Governance.”
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
2020 annual meeting of stockholders under the section entitled “Executive Compensation.”
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
2020 annual meeting of stockholders under the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers,”
“Information as to Certain Stockholders” and “Executive Compensation - Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans.”
113
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
2020 annual meeting of stockholders under the sections entitled “Determinations Regarding Independence” and “Transactions
with Related Persons.”
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the
2020 annual meeting of stockholders under the section entitled “Proposal 2. Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.”
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
a)
Index to Financial Statements.
(1)
(2)
See Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for the index to the Financial Statements.
Schedules have been omitted because they are not required or not applicable, or the required information is
shown in the financial statements or notes to the financial statements.
(3)
See the Index to Exhibits below.
The following exhibits are either filed or furnished herewith (as applicable) or, if so indicated, incorporated by reference to the
documents indicated in parentheses, which have previously been filed or furnished (as applicable) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Posted
Exhibit
Number
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
3.3
Description
Transaction Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2013, between VR CPC Holdings, Inc. and ASC Utah LLC, Talisker
Land Holdings, LLC, Talisker Canyons Lands LLC, Talisker Canyons Leaseco LLC, American Skiing Company
Resort Properties LLC, Talisker Canyons Propco LLC and Talisker Canyons Finance Co LLC. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on May 30, 2013) (File No. 001-09614).
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2014, between VR CPC Holdings, Inc. and Greater Park
City Company, Powdr Corp., Greater Properties, Inc., Park Properties, Inc. and Powdr Development Company.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2014)
(File No. 001-09614).
Arrangement Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2016, between Vail Resorts, Inc., 1068877 B.C. Ltd. and Whistler
Blackcomb Holdings Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on August
8, 2016) (File No. 001-09614).
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 2019, by and among Vail Holdings, Inc., VRAD Holdings, Inc.
and Peak Resorts, Inc., and solely with respect to Section 9.14, Vail Resorts, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on July 22, 2019) (File No. 001-09614).
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vail Resorts, Inc., dated January 5, 2005. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2005)(File No.
001-09614).
Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Vail Resorts, Inc., dated
December 7, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on December
8, 2011) (File No. 001-09614).
Certificate of Designations of Special Voting Preferred Stock of Vail Resorts, Inc., dated October 17, 2016.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on October 17, 2016) (File No.
001-09614).
114
Posted
Exhibit
Number
3.4
4.1
Description
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Vail Resorts, Inc., dated December 7, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on December 8, 2011) (File No. 001-09614).
Indenture, dated May 4, 2020, by and among Vail Resorts, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on May 4,
2020) (File No. 001-09614).
10.1
Forest Service Unified Permit for Heavenly ski area, dated April 29, 2002 (File No. 001-09614).
10.2(a)
10.2(b)
10.2(c)
10.2(d)
10.2(e)
10.3(a)
10.3(b)
10.3(c)
10.3(d)
10.3(e)
10.3(f)
10.4(a)
10.4(b)
10.4(c)
10.4(d)
10.4(e)
10.4(f)
10.5(a)
10.5(b)
10.5(c)
10.5(d)
10.5(e)
10.6*
Forest Service Unified Permit for Keystone ski area, dated December 30, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.2(a) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 2 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Keystone ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.2(b) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 3 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Keystone ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 (c) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 4 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Keystone ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 (d) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 5 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Keystone ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 (e) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area, dated December 31, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.3(a) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 1 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.3(b) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 2 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 (c) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 3 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 (d) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 4 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 (e) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 5 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Breckenridge ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4(f) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2006) (File No. 001-09614).
Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4(a) on Form 10-
Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Exhibits to Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4(b)
on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 1 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5(c) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 2 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5(d) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment to Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(e)
on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 3 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Beaver Creek ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4(f) on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2008) (File No. 001-09614).
Forest Service Unified Permit for Vail ski area, dated November 23, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.5(a) on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Exhibits to Forest Service Unified Permit for Vail ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5(b) on Form
10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 2 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Vail ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5(c)
on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2002) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 3 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Vail ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 (d)
on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Amendment No. 4 to Forest Service Unified Permit for Vail ski area. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 (e)
on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2005) (File No. 001-09614).
Vail Resorts, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on December 10, 2009) (File No. 001-09614).
115
Posted
Exhibit
Number
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
Description
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts,
Inc. filed on December 7, 2015) (File Number 001-09614).
Form of Share Appreciation Rights Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 8-K of Vail
Resorts, Inc. filed on December 7, 2015) (File Number 001-09614)
Vail Resorts Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.22 on Form 10-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2009) (File No. 001-09614).
10.11(a)* Executive Employment Agreement made and entered into October 15, 2008 by and between Vail Resorts, Inc. and
Robert A. Katz. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the report on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the
quarter ended October 31, 2008) (File No. 001-09614).
10.11(b)* First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2011, by and between Vail Resorts,
Inc. and Robert A. Katz (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed September
30, 2011) (File No. 001-09614).
10.11(c)* Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 11, 2013, by and between Vail Resorts, Inc.
and Robert A. Katz. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter
ended April 30, 2013) (File No. 001-09614).
Form of Indemnification Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the report on Form 10-Q of Vail
Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2008) (File No. 001-09614).
10.12*
10.13
10.14
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19(a)
10.19(b)
10.19(c)
10.19(d)
Master Agreement of Lease, dated May 29, 2013, between VR CPC Holdings, Inc. and Talisker Canyons Leaseco
LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on May 30, 2013) (File No.
001-09614).
Guaranty of Vail Resorts, Inc., dated May 29, 2013, in connection with the Master Agreement of Lease between VR
CPC Holdings, Inc. and Talisker Canyons Leaseco LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K
of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on May 30, 2013) (File No. 001-09614).
Vail Resorts, Inc. Management Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 10-Q of Vail
Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31, 2018) (File No. 001-09614).
Vail Resorts, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K of Vail
Resorts, Inc. filed on December 7, 2015) (File Number 001-09614).
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (effective September 23, 2020) (File Number 001-09614).
Form of Share Appreciation Rights Agreement (effective September 23, 2020) (File Number 001-09614).
Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Annex A to that certain Amendment Agreement, dated as of August
15, 2018, among Vail Holdings, Inc., as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. Bank
National Association and Wells Fargo, National Association, as co-syndication Agents, and the Lenders party thereto
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 31,
2018) (File No. 001-09614).
First Amendment to the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2019, among Vail
Holdings, Inc., as borrower, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on behalf
of the Lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the
quarter ended April 30, 2019) (File No. 001-09614).
Second Amendment to the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2019, among
Vail Holdings, Inc., as borrower, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on
behalf of the Lenders party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc.
for the quarter ended October 31, 2019) (File No. 001-09614).
Third Amendment to the Eighth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2020, among Vail
Holdings, Inc., as borrower, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on behalf
of the Lenders party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the
quarter ended April 30, 2020) (File No. 001-09614).
10.20(a) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the amendments thereto, dated as of November 12, 2013, among
Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership, as borrowers,
the Guarantors Party thereto, the Financial Institutions named therein, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, as administrative
agent, TD Securities, as lead arranger and sole bookrunner, and Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., Canadian Branch, and Bank of America, N.A., Canadian Branch, as co-documentation agents
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended October 30,
2016) (File No. 001-09614).
10.20(b)
Third Amending Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2017, among Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership
and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership, as borrowers, the Guarantors Party thereto, and The Toronto-
Dominion Bank, as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on behalf of the Lenders (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2017) (File No. 001-09614).
116
Posted
Exhibit
Number
10.20(c)
10.20(d)
Description
Fourth Amending Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2018, among Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership
and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership, as borrowers, the Guarantors Party thereto, and The Toronto-
Dominion Bank, as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on behalf of the lenders (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2019) (File No. 001-09614).
Fifth Amending Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2019, among Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership
and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership, as borrowers, the Guarantors Party thereto, and The Toronto-
Dominion Bank, as administrative agent, on its own behalf and on behalf of the Lenders (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 10-Q of Vail Resorts, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2019) (File No. 001-09614).
10.21 Whistler Mountain Master Development Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2017, between Her Majesty the Queen
in Right of the Province of British Columbia and Whistler Mountain Resort Limited Partnership (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on February 27, 2017) (File No. 001-09614).
10.22
21
23
24
31.1
31.2
32
Blackcomb Mountain Master Development Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2017, between Her Majesty the
Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia and Blackcomb Skiing Enterprises Limited Partnership
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 on Form 8-K of Vail Resorts, Inc. filed on February 27, 2017) (File No.
001-09614).
Subsidiaries of Vail Resorts, Inc.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Power of Attorney. Included on signature pages hereto.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the interactive data file as its XBRL tags are
embedded within the inline XBRL document.
101.SCH XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB XBRL Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104
The cover page from this Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in inline XBRL.
*Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements.
ITEM 16.
FORM 10-K SUMMARY.
None.
117
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: September 24, 2020
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Date: September 24, 2020
By:
By:
/s/ Michael Z. Barkin
Michael Z. Barkin
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Vail Resorts, Inc.
/s/ Ryan H. Siurek
Ryan H. Siurek
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Michael Z. Barkin or Ryan H. Siurek his or her true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments or supplements to this Form 10-K and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or appropriate
to be done with this Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements hereto, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or their substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on September 24, 2020.
118
/s/ Robert A. Katz
Robert A. Katz
/s/ Michael Z. Barkin
Michael Z. Barkin
/s/ Ryan H. Siurek
Ryan H. Siurek
/s/ Susan L. Decker
Susan L. Decker
/s/ Nadia Rawlinson
Nadia Rawlinson
/s/ John T. Redmond
John T. Redmond
/s/ Michele Romanow
Michele Romanow
/s/ Hilary A. Schneider
Hilary A. Schneider
/s/ D. Bruce Sewell
D. Bruce Sewell
/s/ John F. Sorte
John F. Sorte
/s/ Peter A. Vaughn
Peter A. Vaughn
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
119
CORPORATE DATA
Board of Directors
Senior Executives
Corporate Information
Robert A. Katz
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Michael Z. Barkin
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Patricia A. Campbell
President – Mountain Division
Lynanne Kunkel
Executive Vice President and Chief
Human Resources Officer
Kirsten A. Lynch
Executive Vice President and Chief
Marketing Officer
James C. O’Donnell
Executive Vice President –
Hospitality, Retail and Real Estate
David T. Shapiro
Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
Corporate Offices
Vail Resorts, Inc.
390 Interlocken Crescent
Broomfield, Colorado 80021
303.404.1800
Stock Exchange Listing
The common shares of Vail
Resorts, Inc. are listed and traded
on the New York Stock Exchange
under the ticker symbol MTN.
Independent Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
Transfer Agent and Registrar
EQ Shareowner Services by
Equiniti
St. Paul, Minnesota
800.468.9716
Investor Relations
InvestorRelations@vailresorts.com
Websites
www.vailresorts.com
www.snow.com
Robert A. Katz
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer,
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Susan L. Decker
Chief Executive Officer and
Co-Founder,
Raftr
Nadia Rawlinson
Chief People Officer,
Slack Technologies, Inc.
John T. Redmond
President,
Allegiant Travel Company
Michele Romanow
Co-Founder & President,
Clearbanc
Hilary A. Schneider
President and Chief Executive
Officer,
Shutterfly, Inc.
D. Bruce Sewell
Former Senior Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary,
Apple Inc.
John F. Sorte
Executive Chairman,
Morgan Joseph TriArtisan Group Inc.
Peter A. Vaughn
Founder and Managing Director,
Vaughn Advisory Group, LLC