Innodata
Annual Report 2001

Plain-text annual report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K(Mark One)/x/ Annual report under section 13 or 15(d) of the securities exchange act of1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001/ / Transition report under section 13 or 15(d) of the securities exchange actof 1934Commission file number 0-22196 INNODATA CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-3475943 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization) Three University Plaza Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (201) 488-1200 (Registrant's telephone number)Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NoneSecurities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.01 par valueIndicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports requiredto be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 duringthe past twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant wasrequired to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/ No / /Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to thebest of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statementsincorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. /x/State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates ofthe registrant based on the closing price of the Company's Common Stock onFebruary 28, 2002 of $2.18 per share. $41,154,000State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of commonequity, as of the latest practicable date. 21,450,550 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, as of February 28, 2002. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE [SEE INDEX TO EXHIBITS] PART I Disclosures in this Form 10-K contain certain forward-looking statements,including without limitation, statements concerning the Company's operations,economic performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statementsare made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private SecuritiesLitigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "intend", "believe," "expect,""anticipate" and other similar expressions generally identify forward-lookingstatements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on theseforward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. Theseforward-looking statements are based largely on the Company's currentexpectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, includingwithout limitation, those described under "Risk Factors", and other risks anduncertainties indicated from time to time in the Company's filings with theSecurities and Exchange Commission. Actual results could differ materially fromthe results referred to in the forward-looking statements. In light of theserisks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results referred toin the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K will in factoccur. We make no commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statementsin order to reflect events or circumstances after the date any such statement ismade.Item 1. Description of Business.General We deliver content manufacturing and XML- related digital asset services toonline information providers and companies in the telecommunications,technology, healthcare, defense, and Internet commerce sectors. We have over 100active clients, including Amazon.com, Dow Jones & Company, Lockheed MartinCorporation, ProQuest Company, Reed Elsevier, Reuters, Simon & Schuster, TheThomson Corporation, and Wolters Kluwer. We operate through three divisions. Our Content Division aggregates,converts, tags and editorially enhances digital content - services we refer tocollectively as "content manufacturing" services. We offer content manufacturingservices as a comprehensive outsourcing solution and individually as discreteactivities. The Content Division also transforms data to Extensible MarkupLanguage (XML). Our Systems Division offers system design, custom applicationdevelopment, consulting services, and systems integration conforming to XML andrelated standards. Our Training Division provides a broad range of introductoryas well as advanced curricula and training on XML and other knowledge managementstandards. Our content manufacturing clients often have time-critical outsourcingneeds, with content that requires regular updating or enhancement. We typicallyservice these needs through multi-year contracts or relationships. Approximately92% of our 2001 revenues were derived from clients that used our services formore than one year, and approximately 64% of our 2001 revenues were derived formclients that used our services more than two years. Our XML transformation clients typically engage us to assist in buildingnew, large-scale XML-compliant information repositories or in transforminglarge-scale legacy electronic information repositories to XML-compliantinformation repositories. Our XML Content Factory is the largest dedicatedfactory purpose-built to create XML content. We are headquartered in Hackensack, New Jersey and have four other officesin North America (Dallas, Austin, Minneapolis and Bellevue), seven productionfacilities in the Philippines, India, and Sri Lanka, and a technologydevelopment center in India. Our largest production facility is the XML ContentFactory, in Mandaue, the Philippines. Our wide area network and communicationssystems enable multiple production processes to be performed simultaneously atvarious of our production facilities. Two of our manufacturing facilities havebeen accorded ISO 9003 and 9002 certifications. We use server-based information technology to operate through a structuredworkflow using advanced tools. We drive efficiency and quality by using advancedmanufacturing and management techniques including total quality management andstatistical process control.Content Manufacturing and Outsourcing By capitalizing on the benefits of our scale and specialization, we aim tobe a strategic long-term provider of comprehensive content manufacturingservices that complement our customers' in-house capabilities and enable them torespond to market challenges. Our business strategy is to expand our client base and enhance our service offerings in this area. A critical component of our content manufacturing and outsourcing servicesis the conversion of hardcopy and paper collections and legacy-formatted data toa variety of output formats including XML and XML derivatives, HTML, SGML, OpeneBook (OeB), Microsoft Reader (.LIT), Rocket eBook (.RB), and PDF. For thispurpose, we use high-speed scanning; a variety of commercial and proprietaryOCR/ICR (optical/intelligent character recognition) applications; structuredworkflow processes; and proprietary applications and tools designed to createaccurate, consistent markup and data. We use proprietary technology for dataenhancement and validation, and create automated procedures - utilizing industrystandards-aware software tools such as Omnimark, XMetaL, Epic, etc. - to ensurevalidated SGML and XML markup. Another critical component of our content manufacturing and outsourcingservices is the enhancement of content. Our engineers and programmers developcustom conversion filters and parsers for this purpose. Our subject matterexperts in fields such as law, education, science, medicine, and engineeringprovide taxonomy and controlled vocabulary development, hyperlinking, tagging,general editorial services, and indexing and abstracting. We typically price our services on a resource-utilization basis orquantity-delivered basis.XML Transformation Content publishers seek to migrate to XML-based publishing systems in orderto save money and save time by creating a single data store from which to createmultiple information products (as opposed to having to build a separate datastore for each information product). In addition, publishers who maintain theircontent in XML can syndicate content and spontaneously synthesize data intointeractive "web services." XML content transformation is the prerequisite forcontent owners to accomplish these outcomes. To transform content to XML, tags are inserted within the content to givethe content meaning which computers can read. Our proprietary technologyincludes production-grade, auto-tagging applications that utilize patternrecognition based on comprehensive rule sets and heuristic online databases. Thetechnology enables mass creation or conversion of XML content from complex,unstructured documents. We also translate desktop publishing documents (QuarkXPress, PDF, MS Word,etc.) to XML variants, from which we generate multiple file formats (HTML, OeB,PDF, proprietary eBook formats, etc.) to support multiple channels ofdistribution. We typically price these services based on units of data produced ortransformed.XML Systems and Training Clients who use our XML systems engineering and consulting servicestypically require publishing systems or performance support / process automationsystems that enable multiple authors to collaborate on content and enablemultiple products to be generated from single-source XML assemblies. Our SystemsDivision provides full-service consulting and information system design andsystems integration to configure, improve, and validate these and other softwaresystems and technologies. Services are provided in ISO, IEC, ANSI, IETF, and W3Cstandards. Our Training Division provides clients with professional training,courseware, and briefings in XML and other formal public standards. We typically price these services on a fixed-fee turnkey basis.Business Strategy We seek to capitalize on the increased willingness of companies in ourmarkets to explore outsourcing as a way of reducing expenses associated withcontent manufacture while reserving internal resources to focus on strategiccore competencies such as high-level editorial processes, product development,and publishing. We also seek to respond to our customers' increased interest inpublishing information from a single repository to multiple channels (i.e., web,print, CD, print-on-demand, PDA) and to re-use existing digital assets toquickly create new products. We believe that there is a vast quantity of textual, audio, and video datasources that will be made available on the Web by electronic publishers, andthat many of them will choose XML and its related standards as the underlyingtechnology. We intend to be partner of choice for clients requiring large-scaleXML transformations as well as XML systems development and training. We intend to target publishers and information providers, knowledge serviceand eLearning companies, Internet content portals, information aggregators,e-content vendors, rich media owners, and corporations with online commerce andknowledge management initiatives. Specifically, we plan to drive content manufacturing and outsourcingopportunities by: Expanding existing client relationships and developing long-term relationships with new clients who have recurring requirements for content manufacturing and outsourcing services; Leveraging our subject matter expertise, world-wide data manufacturing capabilities, and information technology infrastructure to drive substantial cost savings for clients while decreasing their product latency and enabling them to launch products more quickly in response to market opportunities; and Offering custom-tailored XML-based business solutions using a variety of proprietary and third-party licensed software on multiple hardware and systems software platforms and domestic and international workforces. We aim to be a leader in the market for XML content transformation,systems, and training by: Further leveraging existing and emerging technologies to create increasingly efficient tools for creating large-scale XML content repositories; Maintaining our position as the preferred supplier of large-scale XML content services, while extending our leadership in XML architecture and XML consulting; Entering into additional high-profile client partnerships for large-scale XML content services; and Continuing to take an active role in developing key structured information standards. Furthermore, we plan to: Extend our service offerings into other strategic areas consistent with our position as a leading provider of digital asset services and solutions; Design customized service offerings to meet the unique needs of targeted vertical markets; Respond to opportunities to provide increased value-added services to our clients; Expand our delivery capabilities to embrace new technology initiatives that are strategic for our clients; and Cultivate and maintain a significant client and project base to create economies of scale that enable us to achieve competitive costs. Close Relationships With Clients Innodata views its long-term partnership with our clients as a criticalelement in its historical and future success. To continue to meet the needs of existing and prospective clients in atimely fashion, Innodata works directly with its clients to identify and developnew and improved service offerings. To promote a close and continuingrelationship with clients, we sell through our North American Solutions Centerand provide 24/7 project support through our Asia-based customer service center. We generally perform our work for our clients under project-specificcontracts, requirements-based contracts, or long-term contracts. Contracts aretypically subject to numerous termination provisions. One client accounted for 30% of our revenues in 2001 and 54% of ourrevenues in 2000. We do not expect to generate any additional revenues from thisclient. One other client accounted for 27% of our revenues in 2001. In 1999, oneclient accounted for 17% of our revenues. No other client accounted for 10% ormore of our revenues. Further, in 2001, 2000, and 1999, export revenues, thevast majority of which were derived from European customers, accounted for 13%,10% and 20%, respectively, of our revenues. We are from time to time required by clients to enter into non-disclosureagreements pursuant to which we agree not to disclose their identity or thenature of our relationship with them. Reasons for requiring such arrangementsvary, but typically involve a preference on the part of the client not topublicize its outsourcing strategy or to telegraph to competitors a new productdevelopment initiative. Comprehensive Service Offering Our comprehensive service offering distinguishes us from our competitors.Many competitors offer only a single service, such as data capture, but do notoffer the full complement of specialized services large organizations require inorder to build large-scale XML repositories or manufacture large-scale digitalcontent. Innodata provides a broad range of content-related services to enableits clients to obtain the full benefit of outsourcing within a seamlessoperational framework premised on our accountability to our clients. Innovative Technology-Based Solutions We have invested substantially in our manufacturing infrastructure in orderto ensure clients a reliable and highly redundant infrastructure and to enableus to employ the latest tools to drive significant process efficiencies.Sales and Marketing Our full-time direct sales force primarily conducts sales and marketingfunctions. Sales and marketing activities consist primarily of exhibiting attrade shows in the United States and Europe, and seeking direct personal accessto decision-makers at existing and prospective clients. We have also obtainedvisibility by way of articles published in the trade press, throughparticipation in industry conferences and standards organizations, and byspeaking engagements at industry events. To date, Innodata has not conducted anysignificant advertising campaign in the general media. Consulting personnel from our new project analysis group closely supportthe direct sales effort. These individuals assist the sales force inunderstanding the technical needs of clients and providing responses to theseneeds, including demonstrations, prototypes, pricing quotations, and timeestimates. In addition, account managers from our customer service groupsupport our direct sales effort by providing ongoing project-level post-salesupport to customers.Competition The markets for our services are highly competitive. The most significantcompetitive factors are price of services, quality of services, reliability ofservices, scope and scale, quality of supporting services, and technicalcompetence. We are not aware of any single competitor that provides the samerange of services as we do, and we believe that we have created significantdifferentiation relative to our quality of services as well as our scope ofservices and scale of services. However, our industry is highly fragmented andwe face significant competition in each of our service areas. In terms of content manufacturing/outsourcing, we believe we competesuccessfully by offering high quality services and favorable pricing byleveraging our technical skills, process knowledge, and economies of scale.Competition is highly fragmented and depends on the specific service provided.We have substantially greater resources than most of our competitors, resultingin greater breadth of services as well as scope and scale. Thus, we have agreater ability to obtain client contracts where the undertaking required istechnically sophisticated, sizable in scope or scale, or requires significantinvestment. Our outsourcing services also compete with clients' and potentialclients' "in-sourcing" personnel, who may attempt to duplicate our services using in-house staff. In terms of XML data transformation, companies compete on the basis ofquality, accuracy, and consistency, as well as ability to deliver large-scale,tag-intensive requirements quickly. Innodata's ability to compete favorably is,therefore, dependent upon its ability to react appropriately to short andlong-term trends, harness new technology, and deliver large-scale requirementsquickly. SPI, Inc. and Jouve, S.A. among others, compete for the XML contentcreation business. With respect to XML systems and consulting, Thomas Technology Solutions,Inc., ArchiTag, KPMG Consulting, and Booz Allen Hamilton are among thoseproviding competitive services. In addition, we must frequently compete with ourclients' own internal information technology capability.Research and Development We maintain a research and development capability to evaluate, on anongoing basis, advances in computer software, hardware and peripherals, computernetworking, telecommunication systems and Internet-related technologies as theyrelate to our business and to develop and install enhancements to ourproprietary systems. During fiscal year 2001, we invested heavily in thedevelopment and integration of proprietary applications for use in our XMLContent Factory. Applications development was predominantly associated withimproving accuracy, consistency, and speed of complex XML tagging forlarge-scale requirements. We intend to make further investments in applicationsdevelopment and integration in order to respond to market opportunities. In2001, all research and development expenditures were charged as developmentexpenses.Employees As of February 28, 2002, we employed an aggregate of approximately 75persons in the United States, and approximately 10,000 persons in fourproduction facilities in the Philippines, one production facility in Sri Lanka,one production facility in India, and a software development center in India.Approximately 800 employees at our Manila facility are members of a union, whosecollective bargaining agreement expired on March 31, 2001. We and the uniondeadlocked in negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement. In August2001, the Philippine Department of Labor and Employment assumed jurisdictionover the labor dispute and, in October 2001, mandated a settlement pursuant towhich membership was granted wage increases approximating 2% per annum throughMarch 2004, plus 50% of any subsequently mandated by law minimum wage increases.The union filed a motion for reconsideration that was denied in January 2002. InMarch 2002, the union filed a petition with the Philippine Court of Appeals. Noother employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe that ourrelations with our employees are satisfactory. At all of our locations, we enforce vigorous policies to protect ouremployees against sexual harassment and discrimination based on age, race,gender or sexual orientation. The average age of our employees is approximately25 years. Over 50% of our staff is female. Most of our employees have graduatedfrom at least a two-year college program. Many of our employees hold advanceddegrees in law, business, technology, medicine, and social sciences. To retain our qualified personnel, Innodata offers highly competitive basesalaries that are supplemented by results-based incentives. Senior management iseligible for bonuses and stock options. Our compensation structure is coupledwith an extensive benefits package that includes comprehensive health insurancecoverage, canteen and grocery subsidies, paid holiday leaves, continuingeducation programs, clothing and optical allowances, and a retirement program.Moreover, Innodata provides overtime premiums, holiday pay, bereavement andbirthday leaves, as well as maternity and paternity benefits. We provide employees a range of workplace amenities, including: internetcafes, where employees can surf the web during breaks; on-site,Company-subsidized restaurants; and on-site stores where employees can purchasedry goods and groceries on credit, arranging purchases from their workstationsover a corporate intranet.Risk Factors The nature of our business, as well as our strategy, the size and locationof our facilities, and other factors entail a certain amount of risk. Theserisks may include, but are not limited to, the following: Risks of Expanded Operations We have expanded our operations rapidly in recent years. As a result, wehave incurred new fixed operating expenses associated with our expansionefforts, including increases in depreciation expense, rental expense, andoverall increases in cost of sales. In order to capitalize on this investment,we need to develop new client relationships and expand existing ones. If ourrevenues do not increase sufficiently to offset these expenses, our operatingresults may be adversely affected. Risks of Acquisitions Acquisitions involve a number of risks and challenges. These include, butare not limited to: diversion of management's attention; the need to integrateacquired operations; potential loss of key employees and clients of the acquiredcompanies; lack of experience operating in the market of the acquired business;and an increase in expenses and working capital requirements. To integrate acquired operations, we must implement management informationsystems and operating systems and assimilate and manage the personnel of theacquired operations. Geographic distances may further complicate integration.The integration of acquired businesses may not be successful and could result indisruption to other parts of our business. Any of these and other factors could adversely affect our ability toachieve anticipated levels of profitability of acquired operations or realizeother anticipated benefits of an acquisition. Furthermore, any futureacquisitions may require us to incur debt or obtain additional equity financing,which could increase our leverage or be dilutive to our existing shareholders.No assurance can be given that we will consummate any additional acquisitions inthe future. Variability of Client Requirements and Operating Results A number of our significant client contracts are requirements-based.Clients may cancel their production requirements, change their productionrequirements, or delay their production requirements for a number of reasons.Cancellations, reductions, or delays by a significant client or by a group ofclients would adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, otherfactors may contribute to fluctuations in our results of operations. Thesefactors include: the timing of client orders; the volume of these ordersrelative to our capacity; market acceptance of clients' new products; the timingof our expenditures in anticipation of future orders; our effectiveness inmanaging manufacturing processes; changes in economic conditions; and localfactors and events that may affect our production volume (such as localholidays) or unforeseen events (e.g., earthquakes, storms, civil unrest). We make significant decisions based on our estimates of clientrequirements, including decisions about the levels of business that we will seekand accept, production schedules, equipment procurement, personnel hiring, andother resource acquisition. The nature of our clients' commitments and thepossibility of changes in demand for their products may reduce our ability toestimate accurately future client requirements. On occasion, clients may requirerapid increases in production, which can stress our resources. Although we haveincreased our content conversion capacity and plan further increases, there canbe no assurance we will have sufficient capacity at any given time to meet allof our clients' demands. In addition, because many of our costs and operatingexpenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in client demand can adversely affectour margins. Variability of Quarterly Operating Results We expect our revenues and operating results to vary from quarter toquarter. Such variations are likely to be caused by many factors that are, tosome extent, outside our control, including: mix and timing of client projects;completing client projects; timing of new contracts; and one-time non-recurringand unusual charges. Accordingly, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of operatingresults for preceding quarters are not necessarily meaningful. You should notrely on the results of one quarter as an indication of our future performance. Client Concentration; Dependence on the Online Information Industry One client accounted for 30% of our revenues in 2001 and 54% of ourrevenues in 2000. We do not expect to generate any additional revenues from thisclient in 2002. One other client accounted for 27% of our revenues in 2001. In1999, one client accounted for 17% of our revenues. No other client accountedfor 10% or more of our revenues. Further, in 2001, 2000, and 1999, exportrevenues, the vast majority of which were derived from European customers,accounted for 13%, 10% and 20%, respectively, of our revenues. A significantamount of our revenues are derived from clients in the online informationindustry. Accordingly, our accounts receivable generally include significantamounts due from such clients. On occasion, we may lose a client as a result ofa business failure, contract expiration, or the selection of another serviceprovider. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain long-termrelationships or secure renewals of short-term relationships with our majorclients in the future. Moreover, revenue derived from certain of ourrelationships depend upon the level of services we perform, which may vary fromperiod to period depending on client requirements. Factors affecting the online information industry generally could have amaterial adverse effect on our clients and, as a result, on our performance.Such factors include: the inability of our clients to adapt to rapidly changingtechnology and evolving industry standards, the inability of our clients todevelop and market their products, some of which are new and untested; and,recessionary periods in our clients' markets. If clients' products becomeobsolete or fail to gain widespread commercial acceptance, our business may bematerially and adversely affected. Risk of Increased Taxes We have structured our operations in a manner designed to maximize incomein countries where tax incentives have been extended to encourage foreigninvestment or where income tax rates are low. Our taxes could increase if thesetax incentives are not renewed upon expiration, or tax rates applicable to usare increased. Substantially all of the services provided by our Asiansubsidiaries are performed on behalf of clients based in North America andEurope. We believe that profits from our Asian operations are not sufficientlyconnected to jurisdictions in North America or Europe to give rise to incometaxation there. However, tax authorities in jurisdictions in North America andEurope could challenge the manner in which profits are allocated among oursubsidiaries, and we may not prevail in any such challenge. If our Asian profitsbecame subject to income taxes in such other jurisdictions, our worldwideeffective tax rate could increase. Risks of Competition The markets for our services are extremely competitive and fragmented. As aresult of this highly competitive environment, we may lose customers or havedifficulty in acquiring new customers and our results of operations may beadversely affected. A significant source of competition for us is the in-housecapability of our target client base. There can be no assurance that theseclients will outsource more of their needs or that such businesses will notbring in-house services that they currently outsource. Risks of International Operations While the major part of our operations are carried on in the Philippines,India, and Sri Lanka, our headquarters are in the United States and our clientsare primarily located in North America and Europe. As a result, we are not asaffected by economic conditions overseas as we would be if we depended onrevenues from sources internal to those countries. However, such adverseeconomic factors as inflation, external debt, negative balance of trade, andunderemployment may significantly impact us. Certain aspects of overseas economies directly affect us. Overseasoperations remain vulnerable to political unrest, which could interfere with ouroperations. Political instability could also change the present satisfactorylegal environment for us through the imposition of restrictions on foreignownership, repatriation of funds, adverse labor laws, and the like. Our Indian operations are conducted through a wholly-owned subsidiary thathas been granted an income tax holiday through December 31, 2004. Accordingly,no income taxes will be payable on earnings from operations of the subsidiaryduring such period, unless repatriated to the U.S. We fund our overseas operations through transfers of U.S. dollars only asneeded and generally do not maintain any significant amount of funds or monetary assets overseas. To the extent that we need to bring currency to the UnitedStates from our overseas operations, we may be affected by currency controlregulations. The Philippines is subject to relatively frequent earthquakes, volcaniceruptions, floods, and other natural disasters, which may disrupt ouroperations. Further, power outages lasting for periods of as long as eight hoursper day have occurred. Our facilities are equipped with standby generators thathave produced electric power during these outages; however, there can be noassurance that our operations will not be adversely affected should municipalpower production capacity deteriorate. The geographical distances between Asia, the Americas, and Europe createlogistical and communications challenges which we must overcome. The Philippines has ongoing problems with Muslim insurgents. The Abu Sayafgroup of kidnappers, which is purported to have ties to the Al Queda terroristorganization, is concentrated on Basilan Island, an island far away from ourfacilities, and the government has stepped up activities to eradicate the group.There can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful or that thegroup will not attempt to disrupt activities or commit terrorist acts in otherareas. Risks of Currency Fluctuations and Hedging Operations The Philippines has historically experienced high rates of inflation andmajor fluctuations in exchange rate between the Philippine peso and the U.S.dollar. Continuing inflation without corresponding devaluation of the pesoagainst the dollar, or any other increase in value of the peso relative to thedollar, may have a material adverse effect on our operations and financialcondition. Since 1997, we have not purchased foreign currency futures contractsfor pesos. However, we may choose to do so in the future. Dependence on Key Personnel Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of ourkey executives and skilled personnel. Several of our officers and key employeesare bound by employment or non-competition agreements. However, there can be noassurance that we will retain our officers and key employees. We could bematerially and adversely affected by the loss of such personnel. Volatility of Market Price of Common Stock The stock market in recent years has experienced significant price andvolume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for the common stock oftechnology and Internet-related companies. Such fluctuations have often beenunrelated to or disproportionately impacted by the operating performance of suchcompanies. The market for our common stock may be subject to similarfluctuations. Factors such as fluctuations in our operating results,announcements of new contracts, partnerships, acquisitions and alliances,technological innovations or events affecting other companies in the Internet ortechnology industry generally, as well as currency fluctuations and generalmarket conditions, may have a significant effect on the market price of ourcommon stock.Item 2. Description of Property. Our services are primarily performed from our Hackensack, New Jerseycorporate headquarters, four other North American offices, and seven overseasproduction facility complexes, including our 100,000 square foot XML ContentFactory complex located in Mandaue, the Philippines. In addition, we have asoftware development facility in Gurgaon, India. All facilities are leased forterms expiring on various dates through 2009, and many are cancelable at ouroption. Annual rental payments on property leases currently approximate$1,900,000. We believe that we maintain adequate fire, theft and liability insurancefor our facilities and that our facilities are adequate for our present needs.Item 3. Legal Proceedings. There is no material litigation pending to which we are a party or of whichany of our property is the subject.Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. See Part II, Item 4 of Form 10-Q for June 30, 2001 as to results of votingat our Annual Meeting held on July 31, 2001. PART IIItem 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. Innodata Corporation (The "Company") Common Stock is quoted on the NasdaqNational Market System under the symbol "INOD." On February 28, 2002, there were108 stockholders of record of the Company's Common Stock based on informationprovided by the Company's transfer agent. Virtually all of the Company'spublicly held shares are held in "street name" and the Company believes theactual number of beneficial holders of its Common Stock to be approximately4,000. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices on a quarterlybasis for the Company's Common Stock, as reported on Nasdaq, for the two yearsended December 31, 2001, after giving retroactive effect to a three-for-onestock dividend paid on September 9, 1999, a two-for-one stock dividend paid onDecember 7, 2000 and a two-for-one stock dividend paid on March 23, 2001. Common Stock Sale Prices 2000 High Low ---- ---- --- First Quarter 4--3/16 2 Second Quarter 2--3/8 1--5/16 Third Quarter 3--1/8 1--7/8 Fourth Quarter 5--5/8 2--3/16 2001 High Low ---- ---- --- First Quarter 7--3/4 3--7/8 Second Quarter 9--1/4 3--1/16 Third Quarter 4 1--1/4 Fourth Quarter 3--3/4 2Dividends The Company has never paid cash dividends on its Common Stock and does notanticipate that it will do so in the foreseeable future. The future payment ofdividends, if any, on the Common Stock is within the discretion of the Board ofDirectors and will depend on the Company's earnings, its capital requirementsand financial condition and other relevant factors. The Company paid athree-for-one stock dividend on September 9, 1999, a two-for-one stock dividendon December 7, 2000, and a two-for-one stock dividend on March 23, 2001.Item 6. Selected Financial Data (Dollars in Thousands)Year ended December 31, 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997REVENUES $58,278 $50,731 $27,490 $19,593 $20,117 ------- ------- ------- ------- -------OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSESDirect operating costs 44,354 34,458 17,854 13,069 16,007Selling and administrative 8,337 7,248 6,783 4,982 5,284Provision for doubtful accounts 2,942 - - - - Restructuring costs and asset impairment 865 - - 133 1,500(Gain) loss on settlement of currency contracts - - - (487) 1,400Interest expense 9 43 10 77 85Interest income (216) (155) (111) (98) (59) ------- ------- ------- ------- -------Total 56,291 41,594 24,536 17,676 24,217 ------- ------- ------- ------- -------INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) 1,987 9,137 2,954 1,918 (4,100)INCOME TAXES (BENEFIT) 639 2,969 841 (332) 100 ------- ------- ------- ------- -------NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 1,348 $ 6,168 $ 2,113 $ 2,250 $(4,200) ======= ======= ======= ======= =======BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $.06 $.30 $.11 $.13 $(.23) ==== ==== ==== ==== =====DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE $.05 $.26 $.10 $.12 $(.23) ==== ==== ==== ==== =====CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE - - - - - ======= ======= ======= ======= =======December 31, 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997WORKING CAPITAL $ 8,854 $ 9,505 $ 5,966 $ 4,749 $ 2,092 ======= ======= ======= ======= =======TOTAL ASSETS $30,094 $27,946 $15,646 $10,596 $10,029 ======= ======= ======= ======= =======LONG-TERM DEBT - - $ 5 $ 24 $ 80 ======= ======= ======= ======= =======STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $20,362 $19,316 $11,652 $ 7,485 $ 5,254 ======= ======= ======= ======= =======Item 7. Management's Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsResults of OperationsYears Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 Revenues increased 15% to $58,278,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001compared to $50,731,000 for the similar period in 2000. Sales to one client whoaccounted for $27.4 million (54%) of the Company's revenues in 2000 declined byapproximately $10 million in 2001. In 2002, the Company does not expect togenerate any revenues from this client. The Company replaced this shortfall in2001 by a $14.4 million increase in revenues from another client and netincreases in revenues from various other new and existing clients. As a result,total revenues in 2001 increased by $7.5 million from 2000. One client accounted for 30% and 54% of the Company's revenues in 2001 and2000, respectively. As stated above, in 2002, the Company does not expect togenerate any revenues from this client. One other client accounted for 27% ofthe Company's revenues in 2001. No other client accounted for 10% or more of theCompany's revenues. Further, in 2001 and 2000, export revenues, the vastmajority of which were derived from European customers, accounted for 13% and10%, respectively, of the Company's revenues. In considering the consequence to expected results in 2002 from theanticipated absence of revenues from the one client who accounted for 30% of theCompany's revenues in 2001, we note that in the fourth quarter of 2001, revenuesfrom this client had declined to approximately $500,000 from an average ofapproximately $5.6 million per quarter for the first three quarters of 2001.However, because of a total of approximately $12 million in revenues during thefourth quarter from other clients, in the fourth quarter the Company earnedapproximately $900,000 before a bad debt provision and before restructuringcosts. Similarly, the impact on the Company's results of operations due to theabsence of revenues from this client in 2002 will depend upon the extent towhich the Company is successful in its marketing efforts to achieve compensatingrevenues from new or other existing clients. In 2000, a significant portion of the Company's revenue increase came fromXML transformation projects by early-stage companies that had raised significantventure capital to pursue digital library and e-business initiatives. Thedownturn in the technology industry in 2001 resulted in a falloff of revenuesfrom companies in this industry sector. Furthermore, the economic downturn thatbecame evident late in 2001 resulted in many blue-chip publishers that had shownincreased interest in XML transformation projects electing to curtaildiscretionary spending and slow down new initiatives. To in part address thissales challenge, the Company began to refocus its sales force to emphasize itscontent manufacturing/outsourcing services. Direct operating expenses were $44,354,000 for the year ended December 31,2001 and $34,458,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000, an increase of 29%.Direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were 76% in 2001 and 68%in 2000. The dollar increase in 2001, approximately 60% of which is comprised ofan increase in labor costs, is principally due to costs incurred for increasedrevenues. The percentage increase in 2001 is principally attributable to anincrease in fixed and certain labor costs incurred for increased productioncapacity which was underutilized during the second half of 2001. Directoperating expenses include primarily direct payroll, telecommunications,depreciation, equipment lease costs, computer services, supplies and occupancy. Selling and administrative expenses were $8,337,000 and $7,248,000 for theyears ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, representing an increaseof 15%. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in selling andmarketing costs, travel costs and facility administrative overhead associatedwith the Company's continued growth. Selling and administrative expenses as apercentage of revenues were 14% in both the 2001 and 2000 periods. Selling andadministrative expense includes management and administrative salaries, salesand marketing costs and administrative overhead. The Company provided an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately$2.6 million representing the remaining balance due at December 31, 2001 from aclient that accounted for 30% of its 2001 revenues because the client hasreported an inability to raise further operating funds required to make payment.In addition, the Company provided approximately $350,000 for other client baddebts incurred in the ordinary course of business. During the fourth quarter 2001, the Company took certain actions to reduceproduction operations at a wholly owned Asian subsidiary that was operating at aloss and to reduce overall excess capacity in Asia. Such activities included thetermination of leases and employee layoffs. Included in Restructuring Costs andAsset Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2001 are estimated facilityclosure costs, including employee related costs, approximating $600,000, and thewrite-off of leasehold improvement costs totaling approximately $265,000. As aresult of these actions, the Company expects a cost reduction of approximately$200,000 per quarter, of which approximately $100,000 was realized in the fourthquarter 2001.Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 Revenues increased 85% to $50,731,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000compared to $27,490,000 for the similar period in 1999 principally resultingfrom a client who accounted for approximately 54% of the Company's revenue in2000. One other client accounted for 17% of the Company's revenues in 1999. Noother customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company's revenues. Further, in2000 and 1999, export revenues, substantially all of which were derived fromEuropean clients, accounted for 10% and 20%, respectively. Direct operating expenses were $34,458,000 for the year ended December 31,2000 and $17,854,000 for the similar period in 1999, an increase of 93%. Directoperating expenses as a percentage of revenues were 68% in 2000 and 65% in 1999.The dollar increase in 2000 is principally due to costs related to the increasedrevenues. Direct operating expenses as a percent of revenues increased by 3percentage points in 2000, resulting from additional costs incurred principallyfor the new XML Content Factory (including start-up costs) (which accounted forapproximately 9 percentage points) offset by a decline in the value of theforeign currencies of countries in which the Company's production facilities arelocated (which resulted in a cost reduction of approximately 6 percentagepoints). Direct operating expenses include primarily direct payroll,telecommunications, depreciation, equipment lease costs, computer services,supplies and occupancy. Selling and administrative expenses were $7,248,000 and $6,783,000 for theyears ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, representing an increase of 7% in 2000 from 1999. Selling and administrative expense as a percentage ofrevenues decreased to 14% in 2000 from 25% in 1999 due primarily to an increasein revenues without a corresponding increase in such expenses. Selling andadministrative expense includes management and administrative salaries, salesand marketing costs and administrative overhead. In 2000, income taxes were lower as a percentage of pre-tax income than thefederal statutory rate due primarily to certain overseas income that will not betaxed unless repatriated due to tax holidays granted to the Company.Liquidity and Capital Resources Selected measures of liquidity and capital resources are as follows: December 31, 2001 December 31, 2000 ------------------ ------------------Cash and Cash Equivalents $6,267,000 $9,040,000Working Capital $8,854,000 $9,505,000Stockholders' Equity Per Common Share* $.95 $.91 *Represents total stockholders' equity divided by the actual number of common shares outstanding (which excludes treasury stock).Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities During the year ended December 31, 2001, net cash provided by operatingactivities was $4,840,000 as compared to $12,387,000 in the 2000 comparativeperiod. The decrease was primarily due to a $4.8 million decrease in net incomeand a $3.3 million increase in net billings in excess of accounts receivablecollected, offset by a $4.7 million increase in non-cash charges. The balance isdue to a net decrease in changes in other operating asset and liabilityaccounts. The $3.3 million increase in net billings in excess of accountsreceivable collected is principally attributable to certain acceleratedcollections received in 2000.Net Cash Used in Investing Activities In the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company spent approximately$5,568,000 for capital expenditures, compared to approximately $7,403,000 in theyear ended December 31, 2000. Such capital expenditures include anticipatedcosts to complete the renovation, re-engineering and expansion of two of theCompany's facilities, capital investment in additional production technologies,and normal ongoing capital investments. In addition, in the year ended December31, 2001, the Company acquired the operating assets and assumed certaindesignated liabilities of the ISOGEN International operating division ofDataChannel, Inc. The purchase price, including acquisition costs, consisted of$796,000 in cash, two acquisition promissory notes, each for $325,000, plus anadditional $68,000 payable September 30, 2002 subject to realization of certainevents. The promissory notes accrue interest at a rate of 7% per annum, and arepayable on April 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively.Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities In the year ended December 31, 2001, net cash used in financing activitiestotaled approximately $1,249,000 primarily due to the repurchase of 270,000shares of the Company's common stock for $1,639,000, compared to $676,000provided by financing activities in the comparable period in 2000.Availability of Funds The Company has a $4 million line of credit with a bank pursuant to whichit may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. The line, which is dueon demand and was unused at December 31, 2001, is collateralized by accounts receivable. Interest is charged at 1/2% above the bank's prime rate. Management believes that existing cash, internally generated funds andshort term bank borrowings will be sufficient for reasonably anticipated workingcapital and capital expenditure requirements during the next 12 months. TheCompany funds its foreign expenditures from its U.S. corporate headquarters onan as-needed basis.Critical Accounting Policies Management's discussion and analysis of its results of operations andfinancial condition is based upon the Company's consolidated financialstatements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principlesgenerally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financialstatements requires management to make estimates and judgements that affect thereported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and relateddisclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, theCompany evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts receivable.Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various otherassumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, theresults of which form the basis for making judgements about the carrying valuesof assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions orconditions. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated lossesresulting from the inability of its clients to make required payments. If thefinancial condition of the Company's clients were to deteriorate, resulting inan impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may benecessary.Inflation, Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions To date, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company'soperations. The Company generally performs its work for its clients underproject-specific contracts, requirements-based contracts or long-term contracts.Contracts are typically subject to numerous termination provisions. TheCompany's revenues are not significantly affected by seasonality.Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk The Company is exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect toits credit facility with a financial institution, which is priced based on theprime rate of interest. At December 31, 2001, there were no outstandingborrowings under the credit facility. Changes in the prime interest rate during2002 will have a positive or negative effect on the Company's interest expense.Such exposure will increase accordingly should the Company maintain higherlevels of borrowing during 2002. The Company has operations in foreign countries. While it is exposed toforeign currency fluctuations, the Company presently has no financialinstruments in foreign currency and does not maintain funds in foreign currencybeyond those necessary for operations.Item 8. Financial Statements. INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE ----Independent Auditors' Report II-9Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 II-10 Consolidated Statements of Income for the three years ended December 31, 2001 II-11Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2001 II-12Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2001 II-13Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements II-14-23INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORTBoard of Directors and StockholdersInnodata CorporationHackensack, New JerseyWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of InnodataCorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for eachof the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based onour audits.We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally acceptedin the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financialstatements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financialstatements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used andsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overallfinancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide areasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, inall material respects, the consolidated financial position of InnodataCorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and theconsolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows foreach of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /S/------------------------Grant Thornton LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 5, 2002 INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000 (Dollars in Thousands) 2001 2000 -------- --------ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS: Cash and equivalents $ 6,267 $ 9,040 Accounts receivable-net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,853,000 in 2001 and $884,000 in 2000 7,846 5,799 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 978 1,194 Deferred income taxes 1,793 839 ------- ------- Total current assets 16,884 16,872 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - NET 10,236 9,464 OTHER ASSETS 2,351 1,610 GOODWILL 623 - ------- -------TOTAL $30,094 $27,946 ======= =======LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIES: Acquisition notes payable $ 650 $ - Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,875 3,196 Accrued salaries and wages 3,770 3,060 Income and other taxes 735 1,111 ------- ------- Total current liabilities 8,030 7,367 ------- -------DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 1,702 1,263 ------- -------COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIESSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: Common stock, $.01 par value-authorized 75,000,000 shares; issued - 21,716,000 shares in 2001 and 21,688,000 shares in 2000 217 217 Additional paid-in capital 13,355 12,239 Retained earnings 8,429 7,081 ------- ------- 22,001 19,537 Less: treasury stock - at cost; 270,000 shares and 577,000 shares in 2001 and 2000, respectively (1,639) (221) ------- ------- Total stockholders' equity 20,362 19,316 ------- -------TOTAL $30,094 $27,946 ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2001 2000 1999 ------- -------- ------- REVENUES $58,278 $50,731 $27,490 ------- ------- -------OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES Direct operating costs 44,354 34,458 17,854 Selling and administrative expenses 8,337 7,248 6,783 Provision for doubtful accounts 2,942 - - Restructuring costs and asset impairment 865 - - Interest expense 9 43 10 Interest income (216) (155) (111) ------- ------- ------- Total 56,291 41,594 24,536 ------- ------- -------INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 1,987 9,137 2,954 PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 639 2,969 841 ------- ------- ------- NET INCOME $ 1,348 $ 6,168 $ 2,113 ======= ======= ======= BASIC INCOME PER SHARE $.06 $.30 $.11 ==== ==== ==== DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE $.05 $.26 $.10 ==== ==== ==== See notes to consolidated financial statements INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 (In thousands) Additional Retained Common Stock Paid-in Earnings Treasury Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Stock Total ------ ------ ------- --------- -------- --------January 1, 1999 18,341 $183 $ 8,723 $(1,200) $ (221) $ 7,485 Net income - - - 2,113 - 2,113 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options 2,055 21 893 - - 914 Issuance of common stock for software development 140 1 67 - - 68 Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options - - 1,072 - - 1,072 ------ ---- ------- ------- ------ -------December 31, 1999 20,536 205 10,755 913 (221) 11,652 Net income - - - 6,168 - 6,168 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and warrants 1,152 12 689 - - 701 Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options - - 795 - - 795 ------ ---- ------- ------- ------ -------December 31, 2000 21,688 217 12,239 7,081 (221) 19,316 Net income - - - 1,348 - 1,348 Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options 605 6 384 - - 390 Purchase of treasury stock - - - - (1,639) (1,639)Retirement of treasury stock (577) (6) (215) - 221 - Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options - - 947 - - 947 ------ ---- ------- ------- ------ -------December 31, 2001 21,716 $217 $13,355 $ 8,429 $(1,639) $20,362 ====== ==== ======= ======= ======= ======= See notes to consolidated financial statements INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 (In thousands) 2001 2000 1999 -------- -------- ---------OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net income $ 1,348 $ 6,168 $ 2,113 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 4,790 2,959 1,797 Provision for doubtful accounts 2,942 - - Tax benefit from exercise of stock options 947 795 1,072 Restructuring costs and asset impairment 865 - - Loss on disposal of fixed assets - 30 72 Deferred income taxes (463) 574 (199) Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: Accounts receivable (3,913) (552) (2,304) Prepaid expenses and other current assets 36 (977) (326) Other assets (723) (409) (74) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (542) 1,653 258 Accrued salaries and wages (71) 1,531 680 Income and other taxes payable (376) 615 (211) ------- ------- -------- Net cash provided by operating activities 4,840 12,387 2,878 ------- ------- --------INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures (5,568) (7,403) (3,891) Payments in connection with acquisition (796) - - ------- ------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities (6,364) (7,403) (3,891) -------- ------- --------FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Payments of borrowings - (25) (56) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 390 701 913 Purchase of treasury stock (1,639) - - ------- ------- -------- Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (1,249) 676 857 ------- ------- --------(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS (2,773) 5,660 (156) CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR 9,040 3,380 3,536 ------- ------- --------CASH AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $ 6,267 $ 9,040 $ 3,380 ======= ======= ========SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid during the year for: Income taxes $ 1,513 $ 1,018 $ 311 See notes to consolidated financial statements INNODATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001, 2000 and 19991. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Business and Basis of Presentation - Innodata Corporation and subsidiaries(the "Company") is a leading provider of digital asset services and solutions.Innodata delivers content manufacturing / outsourcing, XML transformation, andXML (and related standards-based) systems engineering and training through fourU.S. offices and seven production facilities in Asia. The consolidated financialstatements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all ofwhich are wholly owned. All intercompany transactions and balances have beeneliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates - In preparing financial statements in conformity withgenerally accepted accounting principles, management is required to makeestimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets andliabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dateof the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reportingperiod. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized in the period in which servicesare performed and delivered. Deferred Production Costs - Deferred production costs consist of actual labor and certain other costs incurred for uncompleted and unbilled services.Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets at December 31, 2001 and2000 are deferred production costs totaling approximately $67,000 and $876,000,respectively. Foreign Currency - The functional currency for the Company's productionoperations located in the Philippines, India and Sri Lanka is U.S. dollars. Assuch, transactions denominated in Philippine pesos, Indian and Sri Lanka rupeeswere translated to U.S. dollars at rates which approximate those in effect ontransaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreigncurrencies at December 31, 2001 and 2000 were translated at the exchange rate ineffect as of those dates. Exchange gains resulting from such transactionstotaled $75,000 in 2001. Exchange losses resulting from such transactions in2000 totaled approximately $180,000. Exchange gains and losses in 1999 resultingfrom such transactions were immaterial. Statement of Cash Flows - For financial statement purposes (including cashflows), the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased withan original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities in 2001 (in thousands)is as follows: Acquisition costs $1,514 Acquisition notes issued (650)Other amounts payable (68) ------Payments in connection with acquisition $ 796 ====== Depreciation - Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method overthe estimated useful lives of the related assets, which is one to five years.Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line basis over the shorterof their estimated useful lives or the lives of the leases. Goodwill - In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approvedthe issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,"Business Combinations" and SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."The new standards require that all business combinations initiated after June30, 2001 must be accounted for under the purchase method. In addition, allintangible assets acquired that are obtained through contractual or legal right,or are capable of being separately sold, transferred, licensed, rented orexchanged shall be recognized as an asset apart from goodwill. Goodwill andintangibles with indefinite lives will no longer be subject to amortization, butwill be subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying afair value based test. Income Taxes - Deferred taxes are determined based on the differencebetween the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, usingenacted tax rates, as well as any net operating loss or tax credit carryforwardsexpected to reduce taxes payable in future years. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - The Financial AccountingStandards Board issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"which became effective in 1996. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company haselected to continue to account for employee stock options under APB No. 25,"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company has estimated the fairvalue of financial instruments using available market information and othervaluation methodologies in accordance with SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures About FairValue of Financial Instruments." Management of the Company believes that thefair value of financial instruments for which estimated fair value has not been specifically presented, primarily cash and accounts receivable, is notmaterially different than the related carrying value. Determinations of fairvalue are based on subjective data and significant judgment relating to timingof payments and collections and the amounts to be realized. Differentassumptions and/or estimation methodologies might have a material effect on thefair value estimates. Accordingly, the estimates of fair value are notnecessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a currentmarket exchange. Income Per Share - Basic earnings per share is based on the weightedaverage number of common shares outstanding without consideration of potentialcommon stock. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average numberof common and potential common shares outstanding. The calculation takes intoaccount the shares that may be issued upon exercise of stock options, reduced bythe shares that may be repurchased with the funds and tax benefits received fromthe exercise, based on average prices during the year.2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment, stated at cost less accumulated depreciation andamortization (in thousands), consist of the following: December 31, 2001 2000 Equipment $16,805 $12,447 Furniture and office equipment 961 725 Leashold improvements 2,360 2,048 ------- ------- Total 20,126 15,220 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 9,890 5,756 ------- ------- $10,236 $ 9,464 ======= ======= As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the net book value of property andequipment located at the Company's production facilities in the Philippines,India, and Sri Lanka was approximately $9,812,000 and $9,046,000, respectively.3. ACQUISITION As of December 1, 2001, the Company acquired the operating assets, andassumed certain designated liabilities, of the ISOGEN International operatingdivision of DataChannel, Inc. ISOGEN International ("ISOGEN") helps clientsacross a variety of industries with the design, architecture, implementation,integration and deployment of the systems that they use to manage information.It specializes in consulting and training in the knowledge-processingtechnologies of XML (Extensible Markup Language), SGML (Standard GeneralizedMarkup Language), and other standards. The purchase price, including acquisition costs, consisted of $796,000 incash, two acquisition promissory notes, each for $325,000, plus an additional$68,000 payable September 30, 2002 subject to realization of certain events. Thepromissory notes accrue interest at a rate of 7% per annum, and are payable onApril 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002, respectively. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting inaccordance with SFAS No. 141 'Business Combinations' and, accordingly, theconsolidated statements of income include the results of the acquired businessbeginning December 1, 2001. A summary of the assets acquired and liabilitiesassumed in the acquisition (in thousands) is as follows: Accounts receivable $1,077 Deferred tax asset 52 Property and equipment 90 Other assets 7 Liabilities assumed (335) ------- Net tangible assets acquired 891 Purchase price 1,514 ------- Goodwill $ 623 =======4. INCOME TAXES The significant components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes(in thousands) are as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Current income tax expense (benefit): Foreign $ (7) $ 61 $ - Federal 906 2,040 884 State and local 203 294 156 ------ ------ ------ 1,102 2,395 1,040 Deferred income tax (benefit) expense (463) 574 (199) ------ ------ ------Provision for income taxes $ 639 $2,969 $ 841 ====== ====== ====== Reconciliation of the U.S. statutory rate with the Company's effective taxrate is summarized as follows: 2001 2000 1999 Federal statutory rate 35.0% 34.0% 34.0%Effect of: State income taxes (net of federal tax benefit) 1.8 1.6 0.1 Effect of foreign tax holiday, net of foreign income not deemed permanently reinvested (5.3) (3.4) (8.1) Foreign taxes 0.9 0.7 - Other (0.2) (0.4) 2.5 ---- ---- ---- Effective rate 32.2% 32.5% 28.5% ==== ==== ==== As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the composition of the Company's netdeferred income taxes (in thousands) is as follows: 2001 2000 Deferred income tax assets: Allowances not currently deductible $ 1,711 $ 726 Expenses not deductible until paid 82 113 ------- ------- 1,793 839 ------- -------Deferred income tax liabilities: Foreign source income, not taxable until repatriated (1,872) (1,500) Depreciation and amortization 170 237 ------- ------- (1,702) (1,263) ------- -------Net deferred income tax asset/(liability) $ 91 $ (424) ======= =======5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Line of Credit - The Company has a $3 million line of credit with a bankpursuant to which it may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. Theline, which is due on demand and was unused at December 31, 2001, iscollateralized by accounts receivable. Interest is charged at 1/2% above thebank's prime rate. Subsequent to December 31, 2001, the line of credit wasincreased to $4 million. Leases - The Company is obligated under various operating lease agreementsfor office and production space. The agreements contain escalation clauses andrequirements that the Company pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Thelease agreements for production space in most overseas facilities, which expirethrough 2007, contain provisions pursuant to which the Company may cancel theleases upon three months notice. The annual rental for the cancelable leasedspace is approximately $1,200,000. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000and 1999, rent expense for office and production space totaled approximately$1,900,000, $1,600,000 and $850,000, respectively. In addition, the Company leases certain equipment under short-termoperating lease agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2001, rent expensefor equipment totaled approximately $400,000. At December 31, 2001, future minimum annual rental commitments onnon-cancellable leases (excluding equipment leases with terms less than oneyear) (in thousands) are as follows: 2002 $ 600 2003 460 2004 350 2005 320 2006 320 Thereafter 960 ----- $3,010 ====== Litigation - The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claimswhich arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of thesematters is currently not determinable, management believes their outcome willnot have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements. Foreign Currency - The Company's production facilities are located in thePhilippines, India and Sri Lanka. To the extent that the currencies of thesecountries fluctuate, the Company is subject to risks of changing costs ofproduction after pricing is established for certain customer projects. However,most significant contracts contain provisions for price renegotiation. Employment Agreements - In connection with the acquisition of ISOGEN, theCompany entered into a three year employment agreement with its co-founder toserve as the division's President. Pursuant to the agreement, he will becompensated at a rate of $200,000 per annum for the first year, subject toannual review for discretionary annual increases thereafter, and will beeligible to receive an annual cash bonus, the amount of which will be based uponmeeting certain goals. In addition, he will be granted an option to purchase150,000 shares of the Company's common stock at the higher of the bid priceprevailing on such day or $4.00 per share, and will be granted 11,587unregistered shares of the Company's common stock for each of the first threequarters of 2002, provided that the ISOGEN division achieves certain financialtargets for each such quarter. In May 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with its then Chairmanof the Board pursuant to which he will continue to serve as a part-time employeeat a salary of $2,000 per month for five years. In addition, the Company paidhim $400,000 in exchange for a six year non-compete agreement, which is includedin other assets and is being amortized over the term of the agreement. Philippine Pension Requirement - The Philippine government enactedlegislation requiring businesses to provide a lump-sum pension payment toemployees working at least five years and who are employed by the Company at age60. Those eligible employees are to receive approximately 59% of one month's payfor each year of employment with the Company. The terms of the collectivebargaining agreement provide benefits similar to the government. The liabilityfor the future payment is insignificant at December 31, 2001. Under thelegislation, the Company is not required to fund future costs, if any.6. CAPITAL STOCK Common Stock - On September 9, 1999 the Company paid a three-for-one stockdividend and on each of December 7, 2000 and March 23, 2001, the Company paidtwo-for-one stock dividends. In addition, in 2001 the stockholders increased thenumber of common shares the Company is authorized to issue to 75,000,000. Thefinancial statements and notes thereto, including all share and per shareamounts, have been restated to reflect all such splits. Preferred Stock - The Board of Directors is authorized to fix the terms,rights, preferences and limitations of the preferred stock and to issue thepreferred stock in series which differ as to their relative terms, rights,preferences and limitations. Common Stock Reserved - At December 31, 2001, the Company reserved forissuance approximately 9,238,000 shares of common stock pursuant to theCompany's Stock Option Plans (including 1,057,164 options issued to theCompany's current and to its prior Chairman which were not granted under theplans). 7. STOCK OPTIONS The Company adopted, with stockholder approval, 1993, 1994, 1994Disinterested Director, 1995, 1996, 1998, and 2001 Stock Option Plans (the "1993Plan," "1994 Plan," "1994 DD Plan," "1995 Plan," "1996 Plan," "1998 Plan," and"2001 Plan") which provide for the granting of options to purchase not more thanan aggregate of 1,050,000, 1,260,000, 210,000, 2,400,000, 1,999,992, 3,600,000,and 900,000 shares of common stock, respectively, subject to adjustment undercertain circumstances. Such options may be incentive stock options ("ISOs")within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or optionsthat do not qualify as ISOs ("Non-Qualified Options"). The option exercise price per share may not be less than the fair marketvalue per share of common stock on the date of grant (110% of such fair marketvalue for an ISO, if the grantee owns stock possessing more than 10% of thecombined voting power of all classes of the Company's stock). Options may begranted under the Stock Option Plan to all officers, directors, and employees ofthe Company and, in addition, Non-Qualified Options may be granted to otherparties who perform services for the Company. No options may be granted underthe 1993 Plan after April 30, 2003; under the 1994 Plan and 1994 DD Plan afterMay 19, 2004; under the 1995 Plan after May 16, 2005; under the 1996 Plan afterJuly 8, 2006; under the 1998 Plan after July 8, 2008; and under the 2001 Planafter May 31, 2011. The Plans may be amended from time to time by the Board of Directors of theCompany. However, the Board of Directors may not, without stockholder approval,amend the Plans to increase the number of shares of common stock which may beissued under the Plans (except upon changes in capitalization as specified inthe Plans), decrease the minimum exercise price provided in the Plans or changethe class of persons eligible to participate in the Plans. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123,"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation expensehas been recognized for stock options granted to employees. Had compensationcost for the Company's stock option grants been determined based on the fairvalue at the grant date for awards in 2001, 2000, and 1999 consistent with theprovisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company would have reflected a net loss ofapproximately $400,000 or $(.02) per share, basic and diluted, in 2001; netincome of $5.7 million or $.28 per share, basic, and $.25 per share, diluted in2000; and net income of $1.8 million, or $.10 per share, basic, and $.08 pershare, diluted, in 1999. The fair value of options at date of grant wasestimated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weightedaverage assumptions: expected life of four years; risk free interest rate of 5%in 2001, 6% in 2000, and 5% in 1999, expected volatility of 118% in 2001, 115%in 2000 and 107% in 1999; and a zero dividend yield. The effects of applyingSFAS No. 123 in this disclosure are not indicative of future disclosures. Weighted Average Weighted Weighted Per Share Remaining Average Average Range of Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Exercise Prices Outstanding Life Price Exercisable Price --------------- ------------ ----------- -------- ----------- --------Balance 1/1/99 $0.25 - 0.75 6,446,604 3 $0.47 1,169,952 $0.34 $1.19 - 1.49 437,796 2 $1.31 37,800 $1.47 ---------- --------- 6,884,400 1,207,752 ========= Cancelled $0.25 - 0.57 (425,388) 3 $0.38Granted $0.67 - 2.00 1,249,200 5 $1.05Exercised $0.25 - 0.75 (1,946,956) $0.48 ---------- Balance 12/31/99 $0.25 - 0.47 1,321,320 2 $0.34 1,321,320 $0.34 $0.50 - 0.75 3,645,740 3 $0.58 2,056,940 $0.57 $1.19 - 2.00 794,196 2 $1.62 437,796 $1.31 ---------- --------- 5,761,256 3,816,056 ========= Cancelled $0.35 - 2.00 (267,840) 5 $0.85Granted $1.57 - 2.69 2,729,600 $1.97Exercised $0.25 - 2.00 (902,440) $0.61 ---------- Balance 12/31/00 $0.25 - 0.47 1,019,640 2 $0.34 1,019,640 $0.34 $0.50 - 0.75 2,858,632 3 $0.58 2,429,632 $0.56 $1.29 399,996 2 $1.29 399,996 $1.29 $1.56 - 2.25 2,699,108 4 $1.90 295,984 $1.73 $2.50 - 2.69 343,200 5 $2.52 0 - ---------- --------- 7,320,576 4,145,252 ========= Cancelled (156,127)Granted 1,292,200 Exercised (605,357) ---------- Balance 12/31/01 $0.25 - 0.47 979,644 1 $0.35 979,644 $0.35 $0.50 - 0.75 2,406,818 2 $0.58 2,406,818 $0.58 $1.29 399,996 1 $1.29 399,996 $1.29 $1.56 - 2.25 2,564,992 4 $1.89 928,903 $1.87 $2.50 - 2.69 277,642 4 $2.50 80,519 $2.50 $3.05 - 4.60 29,200 4 $3.70 0 - $5.43 - 5.89 1,180,000 4 $5.45 0 - $6.00 - 6.57 13,000 4 $6.21 0 - ---------- --------- 7,851,292 4,795,880 ========== ========== The weighted average fair value as of the date of grant for options grantedin 2001, 2000 and 1999 is $4.25, $1.58 and $0.82, respectively.8. SEGMENT REPORTING Until December 31, 1999 when the Company phased out its document imagingservices, the Company's operations were classified in two business segments;Internet and on-line digital content outsourcing services, and document imagingservices. Internet and on-line digital content outsourcing services segment providedproduct development and data conversion necessary for clients to create anddisseminate vast amounts of information both on-line and via the Internet. In 1999, one client accounted for 17% of the Company's digital contentoutsourcing services revenues. Further, in 1999, export revenues, all of whichwere derived from European clients, accounted for 21% of such revenues. The document imaging services segment provided high volume backfile andday-forward conversion of business documents, technical manuals, engineeringdrawings, aperture cards, roll film, and microfiche, providing high qualitycomputer accessible images and indexing. 1999 (in thousands)Revenues -------- Digital content outsourcing services $26,459Document imaging services 1,031 -------Total consolidated $27,490 =======Income (loss) before income taxes--------------------------------- Digital content outsourcing services $ 3,524Document imaging services (570) -------Total consolidated $ 2,954 ======= In 2001 and 2000, one client accounted for 30% and 54%, respectively, ofthe Company's total revenues. In addition, in 2001, a second client accountedfor 27% of the Company's total revenues. Export revenues, most of which werederived from European clients, accounted for 13% and 10%, respectively, of revenues. A significant amount of the Company's revenues are derived fromclients in the publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company's accountsreceivable generally include significant amounts due from such clients.9. INCOME PER SHARE 2001 2000 1999 (in thousands, except per share amounts)Net income $ 1,348 $ 6,168 $ 2,113 ======= ======= =======Weighted average common shares outstanding 21,332 20,262 18,701Dilutive effect of outstanding options 3,312 3,016 2,592 ------- ------- -------Adjusted for dilutive computation 24,644 23,278 21,293 ======= ======= =======Basic income per share $.06 $.30 $.11 ==== ==== ====Diluted income per share $.05 $.26 $.10 ==== ==== ====10. RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT During the fourth quarter 2001, the Company took certain actions to reduceproduction operations at a wholly owned Asian subsidiary that was operating at aloss and to reduce overall excess capacity in Asia. Such activities includedthe termination of leases and employee layoffs. Included in Restructuring Costsand Asset Impairment for the year ended December 31, 2001 are estimated facilityclosure costs, including employee related costs, approximating $600,000, and thewrite-off of leasehold improvement costs totaling approximately $265,000.11. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) First Second Third Fourth Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter (in thousands, except per share)2001Revenues $18,058 $13,782 $13,849 $12,589 Net income (loss) 2,683 110 40 (1,485)Net income (loss) per share $.13 $.01 $- $(.07)Diluted net income (loss) per share $.11 $ - $- $(.07)2000Revenues $ 8,839 $ 9,712 $13,039 $19,141 Net income 258 429 1,468 4,013 Net income per share $.01 $.02 $.07 $.19 Diluted net income per share $.01 $.02 $.06 $.16 PART IIIItem 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.Executive Officers and Directors The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows: Name Age Position---- --- --------Jack Abuhoff 40 Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentTodd Solomon 40 Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and ConsultantDr. Charles F. Goldfarb 62 DirectorAbraham Biderman 53 DirectorJohn R. Marozsan 60 DirectorHaig S. Bagerdjian 46 DirectorGeorge Kondrach 49 President - ISOGEN International, LLCStephen Agress 40 Vice President - FinanceJurgen Tanpho 37 Vice President - OperationsJan Palmen 47 Vice President - SalesKlaas Brouwer 35 Vice President - TechnologyJ. Sperling Martin 59 Vice President - Consulting Services and Chief Information ArchitectAshok Mishra 46 Vice President - Project Delivery Jack Abuhoff has served as President and CEO since September 15, 1997. Hehas been a Director of the Company since its founding. From 1995 to 1997 he wasChief Operating Officer of Charles River Corporation, an international systemsintegration and outsourcing firm. From 1992 to 1994, he was employed byChadbourne & Parke, and engaged in Sino-American technology joint ventures withGoldman Sachs. He practiced international corporate law with White & Case from1986 to 1992. He holds an A.B. degree from Columbia College (1983) and a J.D.degree from Harvard Law School (1986). Todd Solomon has been Vice Chairman and consultant to the Company since hisresignation as President and CEO on September 15, 1997. He served as Presidentand a Director of the Company since its founding by him in 1988. He had beenChief Executive Officer since August 1995. Mr. Solomon was President of RuckAssociates, an executive recruiting firm from 1986 until 1987. Mr. Solomon holdsan A.B. in history and physics from Columbia University (1986). Dr. Charles F. Goldfarb has been a Director of the Company since October2000. Dr. Goldfarb invented SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language) in 1974and later led the team that developed it into the International Standard (ISO8879) on which the World Wide Web's HTML (HyperText Markup Language) and XML(Extensible Markup Language) are based. HTML is an SGML application, while XMLis a Web-optimized subset of SGML. Dr. Goldfarb served as Editor of the SGMLInternational Standard for 20 years, and is a consultant to developers of SGMLand XML applications and products. He is co-author of "The XML Handbook " andauthor of "The SGML Handbook" (Oxford University Press, 1990). He has beenprofiled in "Forbes," "Web Techniques," "Red Herring," and other publications.He holds the Printing Industries of America's Gutenberg Award, and is anHonorary Fellow of the Society for Technical Communication. Dr. Goldfarb earnedan A.B. degree from Columbia College (1960) and a J.D. at Harvard Law School (1964). Abraham Biderman has been a Director of the Company since October 2000. Heis Executive Vice President of Lipper & Company, Inc., a diversified financialservices and money management firm, which he joined in 1990. He is also ManagingDirector of the Lipper Funds, Inc., a mutual fund family comprised of threepublicly traded mutual funds, and of the Lipper Prime Asset Management/LipperLeumi Asset Management, a provider of asset management services to foreigninvestors. Prior thereto, he served as special advisor to the Deputy Mayor andthen the Mayor during New York City's Koch Administration. From January 1988through December 1989, Mr. Biderman was Commissioner of New York City'sDepartment of Housing, Preservation and Development. Prior thereto, he servedas Commissioner of New York City's Department of Finance and as Chairman of NewYork City's Employee Retirement System. Mr. Biderman is a Director of theMunicipal Assistance Corporation of the City of New York, a member of theHousing Committee of the Real Estate Board of New York, a Director of the NewYork City Public/Private Initiatives, Inc., a Director of M-Phase Technologies,Inc., a company that manufactures and markets high-bandwidth telecommunicationsproducts incorporating DSL technology, and is also on the boards of numerousnot-for-profit and philanthropic organizations. Mr. Biderman is a certifiedpublic accountant and graduated with a B.A. in Investment Banking from BrooklynCollege (1970). John R. Marozsan has been a Director of the Company since June 2001. Mr.Marozsan retired in 1999 as President, Chief Executive Officer and as a memberof the Executive Committee of CCH Incorporated, a leading provider of tax andbusiness law information. In addition, he was a member of the Board ofDirectors of Wolters Kluwer U.S., of which CCH is a wholly owned subsidiary.Prior to joining CCH in 1996, Mr. Marozsan was President and CEO of AspenPublishers, Inc., also a Wolters Kluwer U.S. company. Aspen Publishers,Gaithersburg, MD, develops and markets print and electronic books, loose-leafreporting services, journals and newsletters for business professionals. Beforebecoming President and CEO in 1986, he spent 10 years in a number of managementpositions at Aspen, including Editor-in-Chief and Publisher. Mr. Marozsanreceived a B.S. degree in Physics from Trenton State College (1967), and an M.A.from Harvard University (1970). Haig S. Bagerdjian has been a Director of the Company since June 2001. Heis the Executive Vice President for Syncor International Corporation (Nasdaq:SCOR), and the President and Chief Executive Officer for Syncor Overseas Ltd.,its international division. Syncor is an international provider ofhigh-technology healthcare services primarily for radiopharmacy and medicalimaging segments of the healthcare industry, with annual sales of over $700million. Mr. Bagerdjian joined Syncor in 1991 as an Associate General Counseland Assistant Secretary, became Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel inJanuary 1995, and was appointed Senior Vice President, Business Development, inOctober 1996. He also served as Chief Legal Officer from June 1998 until June1999, Chairman and CEO of Syncor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from January 1999 untilFebruary 2001 and Secretary from January 1995 until January 2001. Mr. Bagerdjianreceived a B.A. in International Relations and Slavic Languages and Literature,and Certificates in Russian Studies, Strategic Defense and National Security,from the University of Southern California in 1983, and a J.D. from Harvard LawSchool in 1986. He is admitted to the State Bar of California. Mr. Bagerdjianhas also served as a director of Advanced Machine Vision Corporation (Nasdaq:AMVC) and currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Point.360 (Nasdaq: PTSX). George Kondrach was appointed President of the Company's ISOGENInternational, LLC wholly-owned subsidiary on December 10, 2001. Mr. Kondrach,who in 1991 co-founded ISOGEN International, served as its Chairman until April1999 when ISOGEN was acquired by DataChannel, Inc. Since 1999 and until ISOGENwas acquired by the Company in December 2001, Mr. Kondrach served in variousexecutive management capacities with DataChannel, most recently as Senior VicePresident of Solutions Architecture. He holds a B.S. degree in biology fromSouthern Methodist University (1975). Stephen Agress was elected Vice President - Finance in March 1998. Heserved as Corporate Controller since joining the Company in August 1995. Mr.Agress is a certified public accountant and had been a senior audit manager withDeloitte & Touche for more than five years prior to his resignation in 1995. Mr.Agress holds a B.S. in accounting from Yeshiva University (1982). Jurgen Tanpho was elected Vice President - Operations in March 1998. Heserved in various management capacities since joining the Company in 1991, mostrecently in the position of Assistant to the President of Manila Operations. Heholds a B.S. degree in industrial engineering from the University of the Philippines (1986). Jan Palmen was elected Vice President - Sales in February 1999. Mr. Palmenwas chief operating officer at SPI Technologies, Inc., a leading competitor ofthe Company, from 1995 through 1998. Prior to SPI, he was general manager,production for Reed/Elsevier from 1991 through 1995. He was also a member of thesteering committee for global SGML implementation. Before that, he spent threeyears with United Dutch Publishers as head of sales and production and two yearswith a global management consultancy company as a strategic consultant. He holdsa M.B.A. degree (1979) in marketing, economics and logistics management and aB.B.A. degree (1976) in economics and marketing, both from Erasmus University inAmsterdam. Klaas Brouwer was elected Vice President - Technology in July 2000. He wasAssistant Vice President for Technology from September 1998 until June 2000. Mr.Brouwer was Chief Technical Officer and Special Projects Division Manager at SPITechnologies, Inc., a leading competitor of the Company, from 1996 through 1998.From 1993 up to 1996, he served as IT Manager and member of the Management Teamof Elsevier Science, responsible for the implementation of Software Development,LAN, WAN and Data Centers. Mr. Brouwer holds a Bachelors Degree in InformationTechnology from the Noordelijke Hogeschool Leeuwarden, a leading university inthe Netherlands (1993). J. Sperling Martin was appointed Vice President - Consulting Services andChief Information Architect in April 2001. He served as a consultant for theCompany in 2000. From August 1997 to May 2000, he served as Vice President,Technology Planning at the Thomson Corporation in their Office of the ChiefTechnology Officer. In that capacity, Mr. Martin worked with various Thomsonbusiness units on major corporate technology initiatives, many of whichincorporated XML content repositories. Prior to Thomson Corporation, he operatedhis own consultancy that included many consulting engagements for clients thatinvolved SGML-based content management and media-neutral database publishinginitiatives. Prior thereto, he was President of a consulting firm and spent thefirst part of his career at Aspen Systems Corporation. He is a widely publishedauthor on digital content management and contributing expert for the chapterhighlighting the Innodata XML Content Factory in The XML Handbook. He holds anM.S. degree in Computer Science from the University of Pittsburgh (1971). Ashok Mishra was elected Vice President - Project Delivery in October 2001after serving as AVP - Project Delivery from November 2000 to September 2001 andGeneral Manager of India operations from 1997 to October 2000. Prior to joiningInnodata in 1997, Mr. Mishra was Deputy General Manager Switching Production inITI Ltd, a premier Telecom manufacturer in India, where he held variousmanagement positions in Production, Planning, Process and Quality areas between1977 to 1997. Mr. Mishra holds Bachelor of Technology degree in MechanicalEngineering from Pantnagar University (1976), Component Manufacturing TechnicalTraining from Alcatel France (1985) and condensed MBA course from IndianInstitute of Management Banglore (1995). There are no family relationships between or among any directors orexecutive officers of the Company. Directors are elected to serve until the nextannual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected andqualified. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board.Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The Company believes that during the period from January 1, 2001 throughDecember 31, 2001 all officers, directors and greater than ten-percentbeneficial owners complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements.Item 11. Executive Compensation.Executive Compensation The following table sets forth information with respect to compensationpaid by the Company for services to the Company during the three fiscal yearsended December 31, 2001 to those executive officers whose aggregate cash andcash equivalent compensation exceeded $100,000. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Annual Compensation ------------------- Number of Calendar Stock OptionsName and Position Year Salary Bonus AwardedJack Abuhoff 2001 $315,600 $ - -Chairman of the Board of 2000 297,892 75,000 1,020,000Directors, Chief Executive 1999 250,000 50,000 180,000Officer and PresidentStephen Agress 2001 $169,000 $ - 100,000Vice President - Finance 2000 164,800 24,720 100,000 1999 160,000 - 72,000Jan Palmen 2001 $156,000 $ 40,817 100,000Vice President - Sales 2000 138,000 115,719 140,000 1999 110,000 38,000 72,000Jurgen Tanpho 2001 $105,716 $ - 100,000Vice President - Operations 2000 102,724 15,409 100,000Klaas Brouwer 2001 $101,400 $ - 100,000Vice President - Technology 2000 92,950 25,097 100,000J. Sperling Martin 2001 $180,000 $ 30,000Vice President - Consulting 2000 - - 100,000Services and ChiefInformation ArchitectThe above compensation does not include certain insurance and other personalbenefits, the total value of which does not exceed as to any named officer, thelesser of $50,000 or 10% of such person's cash compensation. The Company has notgranted any stock appreciation rights nor does it have any "long-term incentiveplans," other than its stock option plans. OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR Individual Grants Potential Realized Value at Assumed Percent of Annual Rates of Number of Total Options Exercise Stock Appreciation Options Granted to Employees Price Expiration For Option TermName Granted In Fiscal Year Per Share Date 5% 10%Stephen Agress 100,000 8% $5.44 1/06 $694,000 $876,000Jan Palmen 100,000 8% $5.44 1/06 $694,000 $876,000Jurgen Tanpho 100,000 8% $5.44 1/06 $694,000 $876,000Klaas Brouwer 100,000 8% $5.44 1/06 $694,000 $876,000The options become exercisable on a linear basis over 48 months. AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR; FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES Shares Number of Unexercised Value of Unexercised In-the- Acquired Value Options at Fiscal Year End Money Options at Fiscal Year EndName on Exercise Realized Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/UnexercisableJack Abuhoff - - 1,815,971/701,677 $3,653,000/$613,000Stephen Agress 60,000 $270,000 205,498/162,502 $456,000/$88,000Jan Palmen - - 121,163/190,837 $227,000/$109,000Jurgen Tanpho 31,668 $190,000 253,174/162,502 $573,000/$88,000Klaas Brouwer - - 121,498/162,502 $135,000/$-J. Sperling Martin - - 29,167/70,833 $22,000/$51,000Directors Compensation Commencing July 2001, Messrs. Biderman, Bagerdjian and Marozsan arecompensated at the rate of $1,250 per month, plus out-of-pocket expenses foreach meeting attended. In addition, Mr. Biderman was granted options to purchase40,000 shares each in 2001 and 2000 at an exercise price of $5.44 per share in2001 and $2.25 per share in 2000. Furthermore, on June 11, 2001, Messrs.Bagerdjian and Marozsan were each granted options to purchase 40,000 shares atan exercise price of $5.59 per share. Dr. Charles F. Goldfarb is compensated at a rate of $2,000 per month, plusout-of-pocket expenses for each meeting attended. In addition, Dr. Goldfarbreceived approximately $29,000 and $15,000 in fees for certain specialassignments in 2001 and 2000, respectively, and was granted options to purchase40,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.44 per share and 60,000 shares at anexercise price of $2.25 in 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company has an arrangement with Mr. Todd Solomon, its former Presidentand CEO, that provides for a salary of $75,000 per annum. In addition, Mr.Solomon was granted options to purchase 176,000 shares each in 2001 and 2000 atan exercise price of $5.44 per share in 2001 and $1.57 per share in 2000. Mr.Solomon serves as Vice Chairman of the Board and in certain capacities asdesignated by the CEO or the Board of Directors. Mr. Barry Hertz was paid at a rate of $75,000 per annum for servicesperformed as Chairman of the Board of Directors until his resignation on May 7,2001. In addition, Mr. Hertz received options to purchase 250,000 shares at anexercise price of $1.57 per share in 2000 and 250,000 shares at an exerciseprice of $5.44 per share in 2001. Dr. E. Bruce Fredrikson was compensated at the rate of $1,250 per month,plus out-of-pocket expenses for each meeting attended, until his resignation inMay 2001. In 2001, no other Director was compensated for his services asDirector.Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation Prior to the resignation of Mr. Barry Hertz and Mr. Martin Kaye in May2001, Messrs. Hertz, Kaye, and Abuhoff were officers of the Company and weremembers of the Board of Directors (there was no compensation committee). Mr.Hertz is Chairman and CEO of Track Data and Mr. Kaye is Chief Financial Officerand a Director of Track Data. Dr. Fredrikson, who resigned in May 2001, is alsoa Director of Track Data As of October 30, 2001, the Board of Directors formed a compensationcommittee comprised of Messrs. Bagerdjian, Solomon, and Marozsan, none of whomare currently executive officers of the Company. Through September 1997, Mr.Solomon served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The following table sets forth, as of February 28, 2002, certaininformation regarding the beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of the Company's Common Stock based uponthe most recent information available to the Company for (i) each person knownby the Company to own beneficially more than five (5%) percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company's directors, (iii) each ofthe Company's Executive Officers whose total annual salary and bonuscompensation exceeded $100,000 in 2001 and (iv) all Executive Officers andDirectors of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, eachstockholder's address is c/o Company, Three University Plaza, Hackensack, NewJersey 07601. Shares Owned Beneficially (1) Amount and NatureName and Address of of BeneficialBeneficial Owner Ownership Percent of ClassTrack Data Corporation (2) 1,952,856 9.1%Directors:Todd Solomon (3) 3,174,815 14.1%Jack Abuhoff (4) 2,015,954 8.6%Charles Goldfarb (5) 43,300 * Abraham Biderman (6) 32,500 * John R. Marozsan - * Haig S. Bagerdjian 10,000 * Named Executive Officers:Stephen Agress (7) 529,616 2.4%Jurgen Tanpho (8) 340,421 1.6%Klaas Brouwer (9) 182,079 * Jan Palmen (10) 164,077 * Sperling Martin (11) 39,000 * All Executive Officers and Directorsas a Group (13 persons) (12) 6,559,459 25.8%________________________* Less than 1%.1. Unless otherwise indicated, (i) each person has sole investment and voting power with respect to the shares indicated and (ii) the shares indicated are currently outstanding shares. For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have "beneficial ownership" of any shares as of a given date which such person has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person or group of persons named above on a given date, any security which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days after such date is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person or persons, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentages are calculated based on 21,450,550 shares outstanding.2. The address of Track Data Corporation ("TDC") is 95 Rockwell Place, Brooklyn, New York 11217. TDC is controlled by Barry Hertz, its Chairman and principal shareholder. The information above does not include 33,600 shares held in a pension plan for the benefit of Mr. Hertz and exercisable options held by Mr. Hertz to purchase 414,697 shares of Common Stock. Including such stock options and shares, Mr. Hertz and TDC combined are beneficial owners of 2,401,153 shares of common stock, representing 11.0% of the total shares outstanding.3. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 1,070,651 shares of Common Stock.4. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 1,900,958 shares of Common Stock.5. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 42,500 shares of Common Stock.6. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 32,500 shares of Common Stock.7. Includes (i) currently exercisable options held by Mr. Agress to purchase 245,079 shares of Common Stock and (ii) currently exercisable options held by his wife to purchase 42,497 shares of Common Stock. Mr. Agress disclaims beneficial ownership in the shares attributable to his wife.8. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 292,755 shares of Common Stock.9. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 161,079 shares of Common Stock.10. Consists of shares issuable upon exercisable options granted under the Company's stock option plans.11. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 37,500 shares of Common Stock.12. Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 3,957,889 shares of Common Stock.Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions. In May 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Barry Hertz,its then Chairman of the Board, pursuant to which he will continue to serve as apart-time employee at a salary of $2,000 per month for five years. In addition,the Company paid him $400,000 in exchange for a six year non-compete agreement. PART IVItem 14. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K(a) Exhibits which are indicated as being included in previous filings are incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit Description Filed as Exhibit------- ----------- ----------------3.1 Restated Certificate of Exhibit 3.1 to Form SB-2 Registration Incorporation Statement No. 33-620123.2 By-Laws Exhibit 3.2 to Form SB-2 Registration Statement No. 33-620124.2 Specimen of Common Stock Exhibit 4.2 to Form SB-2 Registration certificate Statement No. 33-6201210.1 1994 Stock Option Plan Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy dated August 9, 199410.2 1993 Stock Option Plan Exhibit 10.4 to Form SB-2 Registration Statement No. 33-6201210.3 Form of Indemnity Exhibit 10.5 to Form SB-2 Registration Agreement with Directors Statement No. 33-6201210.4 1994 Disinterested Directors Exhibit B to Definitive Proxy dated Stock Option Plan August 9, 1994 10.5 1995 Stock Option Plan Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy dated August 10, 199510.6 1996 Stock Option Plan Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy dated November 7, 199610.7 1998 Stock Option Plan Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy dated November 5, 199810.8 2001 Stock Option Plan Exhibit A to Definitive Proxy dated June 29, 200121 Subsidiaries of the registrant Filed herewith 23 Consent of Grant Thornton LLP Filed herewith(b) There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter endedDecember 31, 2001. SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrantcaused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto dulyauthorized. INNODATA CORPORATION By /s/ -------------------------------- Jack Abuhoff Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below bythe following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and onthe dates indicated. Signature Title Date--------- ----- ----/s/ Chairman of the Board of Directors, March 26, 2002----------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer and PresidentJack Abuhoff /s/ Vice Chairman of the Board of March 26, 2002----------------------------------- Directors and Consultant Todd Solomon /s/ Vice President - Finance March 26, 2002----------------------------------- Chief Accounting Officer (PrincipalStephen Agress Accounting and Financial Officer) /s/ Director March 26, 2002 ----------------------------------- Haig S. Bagerdjian/s/ Director March 26, 2002----------------------------------- Abraham Biderman/s/ Director March 26, 2002----------------------------------- Dr. Charles F. Goldfarb/s/ Director March 26, 2002----------------------------------- John R. MarozsanExhibit 21 Subsidiaries Name under State or other which subsidiary jurisdiction of conductsName of Subsidiary incorporation business------------------ --------------- ----------------Isogen International, LLC Delaware SameInnodata Philippines, Inc.* Philippines SameInnodata India (Private) Limited* India SameInnodata Mandaue, Inc.* Philippines SameInnodata Lanka (Private) Limited* Sri Lanka Same* Wholly-owned by Innodata Asia Holdings, Limited which is 100% owned by Innodata Corporation. Exhibit 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORSWe have issued our report dated March 5, 2002 accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements included in the Annual Report of Innodata Corporation onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofInnodata Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-85530, dated October 21,1994, Registration No. 333-3464, dated April 18, 1996, Registration No.33-63085, dated September 9, 1998 and Registration No. 333-82185, dated July 2,1999) and on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-62012, dated April 11, 1996,Registration No. 333-91649, dated January 6, 2000 and Registration No.333-51400, dated January 2, 2001). /S/---------------------Grant Thornton LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 5, 2002

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above